alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
45004456841UIUICOMMONWEALTHOFPENNSYtVAN(AINVOICENSTD—521REV.12-88 PUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATION AND INVOICE

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION (To be completed by agency)IT0(NAMEANDADDRESSOFNEWSPAPER),FEDERALID.NO.15CC.5EC.NO.FROM(NAMEANDADDRESSOFAGENCY)•AGENCYTSLEPNONENO,

The Tirnes.Lèader,. 75—3218377 Yvette M. House 717—787—9495

P 0. Box 730 Bureau of Air Quality

Wilkes—Barre, PA 18711 400 Market St, 12th Floor

:‘.‘.. :.... Harrisburg, PA 17105HEREWITHISENCLOSEDCOPYFORPUBLICATiONOFAOVERT1SEI.WNTFORPROPOSALSTOTYPEOFAD“EMPLOYPURCHASE []CONTRACT ElSELLCLASSIFID [LEGALNOTICEPURUSHADVERTISEMEN(NO.OFTIME5)MAXIMUMNO.OFLINESDATEORDERNO.

1 October 16, 20090ESOFIERTIONSIGNSFORAGENC

5 ctoer 14, 2009, Wednesday edition

You, as vendor, are authorized to publish this advertisement in your newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, as

follows: Advertisement to be published in regular advertising columns, no position specified; caption of two lines and signature

to be in capitals and subject matter and title of officer to be set solid in type regularly used by_yoyr newspaper for public (jgal)

notice advertising; charge ‘to be made at the ‘rate charged to and paid by cbmmercial advertisè(s for matter similarly set and

occupying similar space; advertisement to be run in the editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of any

contract awarded to it hereunder, said vendor will not discriminate against any employe or other persons on account of race, color,

sex, religious creed, ancestry, age or national origin and that the Commonwealth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of such

discrimination, shall have the right to cancel said contract. Return this copyat once if you will not accept this advertisement under the terms

set forth. Proof of advertising in the form of a tearsheet must be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed

by the editor or publisher) to Agency listed above. Part I must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

Commonwealth to be billed only for actual number of printed lines published.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Càurityof zrrL., 152157

PASTE TEARSHEET HERE _____________________________ /.‘.

Before me, the subscriber, a Notary Public in and)ps?id Coy, peroflIly came ______________________________

who bej,ria duly sworn, doth depose and say that he is L/G_>L) t’ 7/4)

the /‘ ageneralnewspaperpublishedat 36” J,&_

that the advertisement, of which tearsheet is attached hereto, was published in the regular advertising columns of said newspaper,

in the editions of said newspaper, in aN respec ordered and invoiced above; and that the Commonwealth is not charged

therefor at a Wichar9ed any ord(rTh’r’ comiercial advertier foIa similar amount of matter occupying similar space

and set in a ilar m er, §aid newspaper. ( f. //

My commission expires

Sworn and subscribed before me this_______________-:‘.-.—-.,...-...NOTARYPUBLIC / 7AY’5*Thisaffidavitmustbemadebythe Owner,Publisher,orthedesignatedagentoftheownerorpublisher.SIGNAEOFAFFIANTflflMPTROLI FR
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Files No. 33-83112 and 33-07567) of Independent Bankshares, Inc., of our report datedJanuary 28, 2000, except as to the information presented in Note 21, for which the date is March 1, 2000, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report onForm 10-K.

/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers, L.L.P.

Fort Worth, Texas
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Norris J. FANGUY, Jr.

No. 61623.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Norris J. Fanguy, Jr., applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Lafourche.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2030

GEANNETTE J. FOSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LAKE TAYLOR HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CA-98-1153-2)

Submitted: November 16, 1999 Decided: December 17, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geannette J. Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca McFerren King, CITY

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Geannette Foster appeals the order of the district court

granting summary judgment to the Respondent on Foster’s claims

under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Family and

Medical Leave Act (FMLA); granting the Respondent’s motion for

judgment on the pleadings on Foster’s claim under the Privacy Act

of 1974; and denying Foster’s motion to amend her complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the opinion of the district court and

find no reversible error. The district court properly found that

Foster failed to present a prima facie case of discriminatory

discharge under the ADA and that Foster failed to present evidence

that the Respondent was on notice of her need for leave under the

FMLA. The court did not abuse its discretion in declining to

permit Foster to amend her complaint to add a state tort claim. We

therefore affirm the district court’s order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the Company) on Form 10Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I Stuart I. Greenwald, Treasurer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Stuart I. GreenwaldStuart I. Greenwald 
Treasurer

March 16, 2004
Exhibit 99.1












April 5, 2011

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Brad Borror918-588-7582





ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Schedule First-quarter


2011 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast





TULSA, Okla. – April 5, 2011 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will release their first-quarter 2011 earnings after the market closes on May 3, 2011.





A joint conference call will be held the following day on May 4, 2011, at 11 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (10 a.m. Central Daylight Time). The call also will be carried live on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites.





Members of ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ executive management team will participate in the call and webcast.








What:
ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. first-quarter 2011 earnings

conference call and webcastWhen:
11 a.m. Eastern, May 4, 2011

10 a.m. CentralWhere:
1) Phone conference call 866-261-7147, pass code 1524937

2) Log on to the webcast at www.oneok.com

3) Log on to the webcast at www.oneokpartners.com








If you are unable to participate in the conference call or the webcast, the replay will be available on ONEOK’s website, www.oneok.com, and ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com, for 30 days. A recording will be available by phone for seven days. The playback call may be accessed at 866-837-8032, pass code 1524937.











ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky





ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Schedule First-quarter


2011 Earnings Conference Call and Webcast





Page 2


Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.





ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company. We are the general partner and own 42.8 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas. Our energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S. ONEOK is a Fortune 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the websites at www.oneokpartners.com or www.oneok.com.





###
Exhibit  32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the annual report of Rick's Cabaret International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Eric S. Langan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  December  29,  2003              By:     /s/ Eric S. Langan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Eric  S.  Langan
                                        Chief  Financial  Officer


<PAGE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. George HUTCHINSON.

No. 61100.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 1977.

In re: George Hutchinson applying for supervisory writs and remedial writs.

Writ granted. The petitioner is entitled to a speedy trial.
#### Harold W. KLOPP, Appellant, v. Harry NAGEL, the Town of Riviera Beach, a municipal corporation of Florida and the Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 70-552.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 19, 1971.

Hal H. McCaghren and C. Brent Mc-Caghren, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has failed to furnish this court with those portions of the testimony taken *477that were relied on in entering the order sought to be reviewed. Insured Lloyds v. James, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 595. Thus, we are powerless to discern or demonstrate error.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and REED, JJ., and DOWN-EY, JAMES C., Associate Judge, concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles GIBSON.

No. 61756.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 14, 1978.

*770Robert R. Faucheux, Jr., Law Offices of Daniel E. Becnel, Jr., Reserve, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Melvin P. Barre, Dist. Atty., Roland J. St. Martin, Richard L. Edrington, Abbott J. Reeves, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Charles Gibson was charged by bill of information with theft in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:67. On January 10, 1978, after a six member jury trial, defendant was found guilty and was sentenced to serve two years with the Department of Corrections. On appeal, defendant urges four assignments of error.

We have reviewed three of defendant’s assignments of error and found them to be without merit. However, the fourth assignment of error, that the sentencing was not in accordance with La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1, has merit. Article 894.1 enumerates various grounds which shall be accorded weight in the trial court’s determination of suspension of sentence or probation. It is further provided that the “court shall state for the record the considerations taken into account and the factual basis therefor in imposing sentence.” The trial court’s statement of reasons does not reflect that he followed the prescribed sentencing guidelines which would particularize this sentence to this defendant. *See, State v. Jackson,*360 So.2d 842 (La.1978).

Accordingly, we vacate defendant’s sentence and remand the case to the trial court with instructions to resentence defendant in accordance with law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      14,187,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,531,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (749,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,424,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     294,429,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (66,445,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             467,686,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    316,747,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       42,258,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    23,171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,196,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               467,686,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,642,000
<CGS>                                        4,434,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,465,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,901,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,512,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,023,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (5,459,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                46,243,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Curtis THORNTON and Kevin Thornton, et al.

No. 60373.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Harry Connick applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Granted. The case is remanded for the correction of the sentence in accordance with our decision in *State v. Rugon,*No. 60,001.

DENNIS, J.,

dissents for the reasons assigned in *State v. Rugon,*No. 60,001.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstHartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Neil H.Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 
    -  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    -  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

          /s/NeilH. Ellis          

NeilH. Ellis

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

 

Date:January 13, 2010
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 KERRY C. MCDONALD, 2 Plainitff-Appellant, 3
v. NO. A-1-CA-36676 4 CITY OF GALLUP, 5 Defendant-Appellee, 6 and 7 DAN DIBLE, KLO ABEITA, GEORGE 8 KOZELISKI, JOHNNY GREENE, JR., 9 THOMAS SILVA, JONATHAN PABLO, 10 JONATHAN DAYTON, and GALLUP 11 FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION LOCAL 12 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF 13 FIRE FIGHTERS (“IAFF LOCAL 4296"), 14 Defendants. 15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MCKINLEY COUNTY 16 Lyndy D. Bennett, District Judge 17 Sidney P. Childress 18 Santa Fe, NM 19 for Appellant 202 Thomas Lynn Isaacson 1 Gallup, NM 2 for Appellee 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION 4 VANZI, Chief Judge. 5 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 6 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has 7 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 8 {2} DISMISSED. 9 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

__________________________________ 11 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge 12 WE CONCUR: 13

_________________________________ 14 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 15

_________________________________ 16 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge 17
#### Kathleen K. HAMALAINEN, a/k/a Kathleen K. MacLean, Appellant, v. Michael J. MacLEAN, Appellee.

No. 73-648.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 1974.

Robert H. Springer, West Palm Beach, and C. Michael Shalloway, Lake Worth, for appellant.

J. Ralph Mabie, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Denton v. Denton, 147 So.2d 545 (Fla.App.1962); Warrick v. Hender, 198 So.2d 348 (Fla.App.1967).

CROSS, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
#### Paul C. MUELLER, Appellant, v. Joel MILLER, Appellee.

No. 71-889.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 16, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Daniel M. Futch, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Shirley Ann Scott ROGERS, Appellant, v. Rolland Earl ROGERS, Appellee.

No. 70-1011.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), we, John T. English, Chief Executive Officer, and George M. Bachman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/John T. English

John T. English

Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2006





/s/George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2006
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 September 1, 2005

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of August 31, 2005, preliminary assets under management totaled
$1,026.5 million.  Following is a summary of assets under management as of
August 31, 2005 (in millions):

				Equity	  Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts	$299.4	      $144.2      $  443.6
Mutual Funds			 421.8	        72.3         494.1
Private Investment Partnership    88.8	         0.0          88.8
                                ------        ------      --------
Total				 810.0	       216.5       1,026.5


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: September 1, 2005	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary