alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12955]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express and Priority Mail 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service\TM\.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 18, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 12, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 68 to 
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2018-169, CP2018-241.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-12955 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

The Board of Directors
SystemOne Technologies Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-86757 and 333-50401) on Form S-3 and registration statement (No. 333-70379)
on Form S-8 of SystemOne Technologies Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2001,
relating to the balance sheet of SystemOne Technologies Inc. as of December 31,
2000, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' deficit, and cash
flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2001,
annual report on Form 10-KSB of SystemOne Technologies Inc.

Our report dated March 2, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations primarily
resulting from the significant expenses incurred in the establishment of its
national direct marketing and distribution organization and has a net capital
deficiency. The Company may also need to raise additional capital that may be
required to pay maturing issues of long term debt and redeemable convertible
preferred stock. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include
any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

                                                 /s/ KPMG, LLP

Miami, Florida
March 29, 2002
#### James M. SHOOK v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50279.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 14, 1977.

Jay Gore, III, Grenada, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Grenada County; Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Judge.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nelson BEATTY.

No. 62012.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.

SANDERS, C. J., would grant the writ.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles Paul WEATHERS v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne.

No. 60193.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Charles Paul Weathers applying for writ of certiorari and habeas corpus.

*879Writ denied. The contentions raised by this post-conviction proceeding were decided adversely to the relator upon his appeal from the conviction.
### Organization PersonContacted Date 

### Response Bombardier Chester Liburski, 6110/09 Noobjection Aerospace Glenn Baxter Transport Canada Richard Topham 6/10/09 Noobjection National Business Elias Cotti, Manager 6110/09 No objection Aircaft Assoc Technical Services (NBAA) Regional Airline Dave Lotterer, 6/10/09 

### No objection Assoc (RAA) Technical Advisor 

# 1
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
James River Bankshares, Inc.



      We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration  Nos.  33-99156,  333-07997,  333-07999 and 333-61329) of
James River  Bankshares,  Inc. of our report dated  January 28, 1998 (except for
Notes 1 and 17, as to which the date is  February  17,  1999),  relating  to the
consolidated balance sheets of James River Bankshares,  Inc. and subsidiaries as
of  December  31,  1998 and 1997,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
income,  shareholders'  equity  and  cash  flows  for  each of the  years in the
three-year  period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December
31, 1998 Annual Report of James River Bankshares, Inc.

GOODMAN & COMPANY, L.L.P.



131 Temple Lake Drive, Suite One
Colonial Heights, Virginia 23834
March 25, 1999
#### BEVERAGE CANNERS, INC., Appellant, v. E. D. GREEN CORPORATION, and Ingersoll-Rand Company, Appellees.

No. 72-747.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 20, 1974.

Heller & Kaplan, Miami, for appellant.

Friedman, Britton & Stettin and Arnold D. Schatzman, Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on March 27, 1973 (276 So.2d 239) affirming the summary judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and}

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed February 13, 1974 (291 So.2d 193) and mandate now lodged in this court quashed this court’s judgment with directions;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on May 7, 1973 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed in this cause on March 27, 1973 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, and the summary judgment of the circuit court here sought to be reviewed is reversed and the cause is remanded for a jury trial. Costs allowed shall be taxed by the trial court (Rule 3.16, subd. b, F.A.R.).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<S>                                 <C>
<ARTICLE>                                   UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from FPL's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 1997
and condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

<CIK>                               0000037634
<NAME>           Florida Power & Light Company
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                          PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>           $8,970,249
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>           $896,930
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              $1,142,331
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                    $0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                        $477,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     $11,486,909
<COMMON>                                    $0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                   $0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         $0
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>      $4,716,979
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  $36,500
<PREFERRED>                           $226,250
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                $2,673,002
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          $0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                   $0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>              $0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>               $0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                   $0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                 $0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                            $0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>      $3,834,178
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      $11,486,909
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>           $2,939,887
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                  $149,692
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $2,402,418
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          $2,552,110
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>               $387,777
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                      $2,542
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>        $390,319
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>              $116,536
<NET-INCOME>                          $273,783
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            $10,050
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>         $263,733
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    $0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                   $0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                $850,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               $0
<EPS-DILUTED>                               $0

        

</TABLE>
west virginia department of environmental protection 

Division ofAir Oualih. 

601 5~ street SE 

Charleston, WV 25304 

Phone 3041926-0475 FAX: 3041926-0479 

June 5,2013 

Ms. Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

USEPA Region I11 

1650 Arch Street (3AP00) 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor 

Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretaly 

www.dep.w.gov 

I RE: Proposed Air Quality Rules for 2014 Legislative Session 

Enclosed is a notice of public comment period and public hearings, and a copy of seven (7) 

proposed air quality rules: 45CSR8, 45CSR14, 45CSR16, 45CSR18, 45CSR19, 45CSR25 and 

45CSR34 for the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality 

(DAQ). Once these rules have been authorized and promulgated by the West Virginia Legislature, 

the DAQ is proposing to adopt them in the Spring of 2014. 

Please note the DAQ will accept written comments on the proposed rules up to and including 

July 8,2013. In addition, the agency will receive oral comments at a public hearing to be held on 

July 8,2013, beginning at 6:00 p.m. 

The attached public notice describes which rules the agency is proposing and what action the 

DAQ intends to request of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency upon the authorization and 

promulgation of the rules in the Spring of 2014. 

Please submit any written comments to my attention at the above address, or feel free to call me 

with any questions regarding this matter at (304) 926-0462. 

J Director 

JABIjlm 

Enclosures 

Promoting a healthy environment.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1773

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Carlos F. Thompson, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 1, 2010

Filed: October 20, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Carlos Thompson guilty of knowingly possessing a firearm after

having been convicted of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and

924(a)(2). The district court1

 sentenced him within the calculated advisory Guidelines

range to 51 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release, and ordered him to pay

a fine of $3,000. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the court’s denial of two

1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas.
motions for appointment of new counsel, the sufficiency of the evidence to support

Thompson’s conviction, and the reasonableness of the sentence.

To begin, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying Thompson’s motions for new counsel. See United States v. Anderson, 570

F.3d 1025, 1031 (8th Cir. 2009) (review standard; describing circumstances where

defendant may be entitled to new counsel). We further conclude that there was

sufficient evidence to support Thompson’s conviction. See United States v. Myers,

575 F.3d 801, 808 (8th Cir. 2009) (this court reviews sufficiency of evidence viewing

evidence in light most favorable to jury’s verdict; verdict will be upheld if there is any

interpretation of evidence that could lead reasonable jury to find defendant guilty

beyond reasonable doubt); United States v. Bradley, 473 F.3d 866, 867 (8th Cir. 2007)

(setting forth elements of § 922(g)(1) offense; government can prove defendant

knowingly possessed firearm by showing he had actual or constructive possession of

it). We also conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. 

See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461, 464 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc)

(standards for reviewing sentence); United States v. Saddler, 538 F.3d 879, 890 (8th

Cir. 2008) (describing circumstances where district court abuses its discretion and

imposes unreasonable sentence).

Finally, having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

-2-
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 3, 2015














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---




Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of February 28, 2015 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$10,357Sub-advised funds700Institutional accounts5,179Total$16,236





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,644Small-Mid Cap1,488Large Cap8,094Select (All Cap)483Long-Short4,261Strategic Income266Total$16,236








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:March 3, 2015By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
#### Leo Joseph SAITTA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43196.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Cause dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8074 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8074

      To provide for the issuance of a Veterans Health Care Stamp.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 21, 2020

 Mr. Burgess introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To provide for the issuance of a Veterans Health Care Stamp.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Health Care Stamp Act''.

SEC. 2. VETERANS HEALTH CARE STAMP.

    (a) In General.--In order to afford a convenient way for members of 
the public to contribute to funding for the medical care and treatment 
of veterans, the United States Postal Service shall provide for the 
issuance and sale of a special postage stamp which shall be known as 
the ``Veterans Health Care Stamp''.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--The issuance and sale of the Veterans 
Health Care Stamp shall be governed by section 416 of title 39, United 
States Code (as last in effect, if expired), except that--
            (1) all amounts becoming available from the sale of the 
        stamp shall be transferred to the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs in accordance with section 416(d) of such title; and
            (2) the stamp--
                    (A) shall be issued in time for Veterans Day of 
                each year;
                    (B) shall bear such illustration, depiction, 
                design, or other image as the United States Postal 
                Service shall determine; and
                    (C) shall not be subject to any numerical 
                limitation under section 416(e)(1)(C) of such title.
                                 <all>
```
#### TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, v. Houston ROGERS and Jewell Rogers, Plaintiffs-Appellees.

No. 47257.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 22, 1973.

M. M. Roberts, S. Wayne Easterling, Hattiesburg, John K. Keyes, Collins, for defendant-appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of plaintiffs-ap-pellees.

PATTERSON, Justice:

This case arises from a tort suit in the Circuit Court of Covington County. The *305defendant below appeals from a jury verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $1750. No brief responding- to that of the appellant has been filed by the appellees though a certified true copy of the appellant’s brief was sent to them on October 31, 1972.

We have considered the brief and argument of the appellant, as well as the record, and we cannot with confidence affirm the case. In fact, it is our opinion that it is controlled by Lawler v. Moran, 245 Miss. 301, 148 So.2d 198 (1963), wherein we stated in quoting from Gulf, M. & O. R. Co. v. Webster County, 194 Miss. 660, 13 So.2d 644 (1943):

> “The failure to file this brief [by the appellee] is tantamount to a confession of error, and will be accepted as such, and the judgment of the court below will be reversed, since an answer to the appellant’s brief cannot be safely made by us, without our doing that which the ap-pellee, by its attorney, should have done, i.e., brief the appellee’s side of the case. This we are not called on to do, therefore the case falls within, and is governed by, W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong, 165 Miss. 380, 140 So. 527.” (245 Miss. at 302, 148 So.2d at 199).

*See*the more recent cases of Jackson v. Walker, 240 So.2d 606 (Miss.1970); Charles F. Hayes & Associates, Inc. v. Blue, 233 So.2d 127 (Miss.1970), and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State, 204 So.2d 852 (Miss.1967), to the same effect.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed and remanded to the Circuit Court of Covington County for a trial upon the question of damages only. *See*Graves, Proof of Damages to Property in Tort Actions, 33 Miss.L.J. 151 (1962), and Southland Co. v. Aaron, 221 Miss. 59, 72 So.2d 161 (1954), relating to this issue.

Reversed and remanded.

GILLESPIE, C. J., and INZER, SUGG and WALKER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         837,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,313,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      16,302,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        16,467,000
<LOANS>                                    186,126,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,521,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             221,521,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 136,622,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                37,250,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,176,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,443,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             221,521,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             15,523,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              950,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               584,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,057,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,154,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,404,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,653,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  (76,000)
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,390,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,681,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,681,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,247,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.06
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,799,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,337,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              8,667,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,624,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   27,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,521,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,521,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>