alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary of financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of earnings for the six
months ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>        1,000


<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       125,450
<SECURITIES>                                   2,167
<RECEIVABLES>                                901,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  415,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,531,629
<PP&E>                                     1,004,893
<DEPRECIATION>                               364,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3,317,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,381,839
<BONDS>                                      688,535
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        175,000
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                      40,748
<OTHER-SE>                                   332,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3,317,210
<SALES>                                    1,827,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,859,039
<CGS>                                      1,773,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,773,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            38,921
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               26,251
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,232
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           17,019
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  17,019
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .42


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
       
<S>                          <C>  

<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                            111,118
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,912,987
<ALLOWANCES>                      238,000
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,551,116
<PP&E>                          3,249,675
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,698,559
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,527,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           8,354,572
<BONDS>                           454,951
<COMMON>                          130,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       110,858
<OTHER-SE>                     (2,532,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    6,527,825
<SALES>                         5,765,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                5,765,819
<CGS>                           4,801,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,998,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 73,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (306,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (306,496)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (306,496)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (0.02)
        





</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6753
DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSEPH LOFTON; RALPH S. BRITT; WILLIAM JENNETTE; S. D. STEWART; SERGEANT WOOTEN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-707-5-H) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district co urt's order affirming the magistrate judge's order denying Appellant's motion for discovery. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                    <C>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1997               OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1997               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  45,211,000                45,211,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              813,000                   813,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                30,000                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                      0                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        49,091,000                49,091,000
<PP&E>                                           0                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          81,023,000                81,023,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,613,000                10,613,000
<BONDS>                                 91,406,000                91,406,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                         0
<PREFERRED>                                      0                         0
<COMMON>                                28,251,000                28,251,000
<OTHER-SE>                            (76,683,000)              (76,683,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            81,023,000                81,023,000
<SALES>                                          0                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           708,000                   218,000
<CGS>                                            0                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           36,070,000                13,413,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           301,000                   199,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      18,033,000                 4,659,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (49,804,000)              (17,296,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                10,000                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (49,814,000)              (17,306,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                         0
<CHANGES>                                        0                         0
<NET-INCOME>                          (49,814,000)              (17,306,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (6.48)                    (2.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (6.48)                    (2.24)



</TABLE>
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 3, 2017














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of September 30, 2017 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$15,417Sub-advised funds1,411Institutional accounts4,627Total$21,455





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,549Small-Mid Cap3,482Mid Cap121Large Cap10,153All Cap Select396Long-Short4,943Corporate bonds687Core fixed income340(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(216)Total$21,455








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:October 3, 2017By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
directive. Accordingly, we conclude that appellants have abandoned this

appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Jerry A. Wiese, District Judge Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge Bryant Hayward Paraskevi Siderakis Phillip Edward Jones Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 74/P49> 2
---

| |  |                                  |  |           |               
| |  | -------------------------------- |  | --------- | --------------
| |  | KPMG LLP                         |  | Telephone | (604) 691-3000
| |  | Chartered Accountants            |  | Fax       | (604) 691-3031
| |  | PO Box 10426 777 Dunsmuir Street |  | Internet  | www.kpmg.ca   
| |  | Vancouver BC V7Y 1K3             |  |           |               
| |  | Canada                           |  |           |               



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED

PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors Great Basin Gold Ltd.

We consent to the inclusion in this annual report on Form
40-F/A of our Auditors Report dated March 16, 2007, except as to note 20 which
is as of March 30, 2007, on the consolidated balance sheet of Great Basin Gold
Ltd. (the Company) as at December 31, 2006 and the consolidated statements of
operations, deficit and cash flows for the year then ended which is contained in
this annual report on Form 40-F/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement (No. 333-141985) on Form F-10 of the Company of our
report noted above.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

February 20, 2009





| | KPMG LLP, a Canadian limited liability partnership is the Canadian | 
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| | member firm of KPMG Internationa, a Swiss Cooperative.             | 





---
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jessie J. SCOTT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 61678.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Jessie J. Scott, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ denied. Petitioner’s remedy is to file for habeas corpus alleging grounds on which plea of guilty is involuntary.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TRAVIS STAMBAUGH,

Petitioner

v.

MIFFLIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS 

[SIC] OFFICE; MAYORS [SIC] OFFICE FOR 

BOROUGH OF (LEWISTOWN); OFFICE OF 

ATTORNEY GENERALS [SIC]; MIFFLIN 

COUNTY & PENNSYLVANIA STATE 

OFFICIALS IN THEIR OFFICIAL 

CAPACITIES,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 54 MM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 99.1**

SNODGRASSCertified Public Accountantsand Consultants

**INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT’S REPORT**

We have reviewed theaccompanying consolidated balance sheets of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three-monthperiods then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by theAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as awhole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financialstatements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditingstandards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (notpresented herein); and in our report dated February 7, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

| /s/ S.R. SNODGRASS A.C.             |   |   |        |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                     |   |   |   |
|                                |   |   |   |   |
| Wheeling, West VirginiaMay 12, 2003 |   |   |   |
|                                     |        |        |        |  |

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062

35
#### DADE LINEN AND FURNITURE CO., d/b/a Monarch Contract Interiors, Appellant, v. BUCKLEY DEVELOPMENT CO., Ltd., Appellee.

Nos. 70-464, 70-465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

Fine, Jacobson & Block, and Barry N. Semet, Miami, for appellant.

Elliott Harris, Miami Beach, for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

This is a consolidated appeal from a “final judgment” and a “final judgment as to costs and attorney’s fees” in the same non-jury trial.

Appellee-plaintiff Buckley Development Co., Ltd. (“Buckley”) sued appellant-defendant Dade Linen and Furniture Co., d/b/a Monarch Contract Interiors (“Dade Linen”) for breach of a contract to furnish carpeting for Buckley’s new condominium. The contract was signed on March 13, 1968. In July or August, 1968, Dade Linen advised Buckley that there might be some problems in Dade Linen’s performing its contract. The exact words and substance of this communication were in conflict, but the trial court found an anticipatory repudiation. Late in August, 1968, Buckley wrote that he was terminating the instant contract for Dade Linen’s inability to perform, about three months before *563Dade Linen’s performance was due to commence.

Buckley characterizes subsequent communications as attempts to help Dade Linen fulfill the obligations. Dade Linen asserts these communications show premature termination.

After August, 1968, Buckley attempted to “cover” at a reasonable price for comparable carpeting, by contracting with The W. P. Simpson Co. Pursuant to such contract, ten of seventeen floors were carpeted.

The trial court permitted Buckley to introduce into evidence a paper captioned “Recap” to establish his damages. Dade Linen contends that because Buckley did not introduce substantiating checks or invoices to show the actual cost of the carpeting, Buckley failed to prove how much it paid. Buckley insists that the “Recap” shows that the entire building’s carpeting, less certain common areas, cost more than $7,000 more than the original Buckley-Dade Linen contract.

Dade Linen’s points on appeal are: (1) that the trial court’s finding that the defendant Dade Linen repudiated its contract was not supported by sufficient competent evidence; (2) that the trial court’s award of damages to plaintiff was not supported by sufficient competent evidence of actual damages sustained.

We have carefully examined and considered the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that the trial court’s findings and holdings complained of are fully supported in law and fact and that no reversible error has been demonstrated. See Safe-T-Lawn, Inc. v. Agricultural Engineering Association, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 25, 26-27. We note also that a reviewing court will not upset findings of fact by the trial court sitting as the finder of the facts where such findings are based upon competent substantial evidence.

Therefore, the “final judgment” and the “final judgment as to costs and reasonable attorney’s fees” are affirmed.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8169

ELVIS JOSEPH AMARAME, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, Warden, in his individual capacity; 

ROBERT GATES, in his individual capacity; JOSEPH OWENS, in 

his individual capacity, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. 

(6:07-cv-02775-HFF-WMC) 

Submitted: April 21, 2009 Decided: May 8, 2009 

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Elvis Joseph Amarame, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Elvis Joseph Amarame seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to 

grant in part and deny in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss 

Amarame’s complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Amarame seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than July 19, 2018.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis*                     (Mark A. Rauzi, Vice President), 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:                

                    1.                     *Greta Christianson, Bloomington, Minnesota and Ingrid Langseth, Worthington, Minnesota, individually, and as members of the Christianson/Langseth family shareholder group*; to retain voting shares of FSB Holding Company, Inc., Trimont, Minnesota (FSB), and thereby indirectly retain shares of Farmers State Bank of Trimont, Trimont, Minnesota (Trimont Bank).                

Additionally, Beverly Anthony, Trimont, Minnesota, as a member of the Anthony family shareholder control group; to retain shares of FSB, and thereby indirectly retain shares of Trimont Bank.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 19, 2018.

Ann Misback,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2018-13473 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE P