alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-2000
<CASH>                                         18,665
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               19,601
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    315,818
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         6,550
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           6,534
<LOANS>                                        10,074,150
<ALLOWANCE>                                    34,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,893,863
<DEPOSITS>                                     8,082,689
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,491,510
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            87,966
<LONG-TERM>                                    607,062
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       282
<OTHER-SE>                                     624,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 10,893,863
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                760,538
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              23,822
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               784,360
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             379,303
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,582
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          262,475
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  3,251
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (106)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                137,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,309
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     99,251
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   99,251
<EPS-BASIC>                                    3.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.51
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 7.94
<LOANS-NON>                                    44,750
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               206
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                1,844
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               38,342
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  7,560
<RECOVERIES>                                   419
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              34,452
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           34,452
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        2,800



</TABLE>
#### Samuel Wade WARRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 41842.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 28, 1973.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of murder in the first degree without recommendation of mercy. Subsequently under authority of Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346, the Supreme Court of Florida in Anderson v. State, 267 So.2d 8 (Fla.1972) reduced appellant’s sentence from death to life imprisonment. Upon careful consideration and analysis of the record and briefs in this case, we find no reversible error. Accordingly, the conviction, as previously modified by reduction of sentence, is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ER VIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Earl HARDOUIN.

No. 60155.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Harry Connick, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and stay order.

Writ denied. No abuse of discretion shown.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FILED
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,935
<SECURITIES>                                    64,649
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,749
<PP&E>                                          24,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,266
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,612
<BONDS>                                          6,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,334
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,809
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,505
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,274)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (9,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (9,274)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 666 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 666

   To amend the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide that any 
 rescission of budget authority proposed by the President take effect 
 unless specifically disapproved by the adoption of a joint resolution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 1993

 Mr. Dornan (for himself and Mr. Shays) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred jointly to the Committees on Government Operations 
                               and Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to provide that any 
 rescission of budget authority proposed by the President take effect 
 unless specifically disapproved by the adoption of a joint resolution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF DEFINITION OF RESCISSION BILL.

    Paragraph (3) of section 1011 of the Impoundment Control Act of 
1974 is amended by striking out ``rescinds, in whole or in part,'' and 
by inserting in lieu thereof ``expresses its disapproval of''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO MAKE AVAILABLE FOR OBLIGATION.

    Subsection (b) of section 1012 of the Impoundment Control Act of 
1974 is amended by striking out ``rescinding all or part of'' and by 
inserting in lieu thereof ``disapproving the rescission of''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect with respect to 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1993.

                                 <all>
```
#### Chester C. BAUDOIN, Sheriff, St. Mary Parish v. Michael FONSECA.

No. 60412.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Michael Fonseca applying for Cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Mary. 347 So.2d 1246.

Granted, and remanded to the district court to reconsider its forfeiture judgment in the light of *State*v. *1971 Green GMC Van*and *State v. One 1973 Grand Prix Pontiac,*docket No. 59,635, decided September 19, 1977.

SANDERS, C. J., and MARCUS, J.

having dissented in the cited cases concur in the granting of writ.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. Because I do not agree with the decisions of this Court referred to in the reasons assigned by the majority, and in my view the decision of the trial and appellate courts was correct, I would deny this writ.
**Exhibit32**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of Horizon Health Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/  JAMES K. NEWMAN                  |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |   |
| James K. Newman                       |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November 9, 2006                      |   |
|                                  |   |
|                                  |   |
| /s/ JOHN E. PITTS                     |   |
|                                  |   |
| John E. Pitts                         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer               |   |
| November 9, 2006                      |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Jerome E. Ball, Chief Executive Officer for ForwardIndustries, Inc. ("Forward"), and Douglas W. Sabra, Chief Financial Officer ofForward, do each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that, to the best of theirknowledge:

1.                     Forward'squarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the three and nine months ended June 30,2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                     the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Forward.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 21st day of July 2004. 

 

/s/ JEROME E. BALLJerome E. BallChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer

/s/ DOUGLAS W. SABRADouglas W. SabraChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Willie HOLDEN.

No. 61929.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Willie Holden applying for writs of review, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Caddo.

Writ denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                           FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Stuart
I. Greenwald, Treasurer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                          __________________________________
                                          Stuart I. Greenwald
                                          Treasurer

                                          December 16, 2002


                                       17
Union Calendar No. 34

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 616

[Report No. 103–76]

A BILL

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to

ment discretion.counts for which such members exercise investto effect certain transactions with respect to acpermit members of national securities exchanges

APRIL 29, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 34

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 616

[Report No. 103–76]

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit members of national

securities exchanges to effect certain transactions with respect to accounts for which such members exercise investment discretion.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Mr. FIELDS of Texas) introduced the following

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

APRIL 29, 1993

Additional sponsor: Mr. MOORHEAD

APRIL 29, 1993

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

A BILL

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to permit

members of national securities exchanges to effect certain

transactions with respect to accounts for which such

members exercise investment discretion.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 616 RH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITED TRANSACTIONS.

2 Section 11(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of

3 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78k(a)(1)) is amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘(other

5 than an investment company)’’;

6 (2) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subpara7 graph (G);

8 (3) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as sub9 paragraph (I); and

10 (4) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the fol11 lowing new subparagraph:

12 ‘‘(H) any transaction for an account with re13 spect to which such member or an associated person

14 thereof exercises investment discretion if such mem15 ber—

16 ‘‘(i) has obtained, from the person or per17 sons authorized to transact business for the ac18 count, express authorization for such member

19 or associated person to effect such transactions

20 prior to engaging in the practice of effecting

21 such transactions;

22 ‘‘(ii) furnishes the person or persons au23 thorized to transact business for the account

24 with a statement at least annually disclosing

25 the aggregate compensation received by the ex-
3

•HR 616 RH

1 change member in effecting such transactions;

2 and

3 ‘‘(iii) complies with any rules the Commis4 sion has prescribed with respect to the require5 ments of clauses (i) and (ii); and’’.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE> 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              86
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                        60
<INVENTORY>                                      1,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,554
<PP&E>                                           2,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                     376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,820
<BONDS>                                          3,397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         43
<COMMON>                                           352
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,864
<SALES>                                          1,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,642
<CGS>                                            1,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      264
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  71
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    107
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 62
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (23)
<CHANGES>                                         (13)
<NET-INCOME>                                        26
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 80 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot program 

to improve the ability of Members of Congress to assist constituents 

with respect to benefits for veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GOSAR, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, and 

Mrs. LESKO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out 

a pilot program to improve the ability of Members of 

Congress to assist constituents with respect to benefits 

for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Phoenix VA Congres5 sional Oversight Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 80 IH

1 SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE CONSTITUENT SERV2 ICES. 

3 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—The Secretary of Veterans Af4 fairs shall carry out a pilot program to improve the ability 

5 of Members of Congress to assist constituents pursuant 

6 to subsections (b) and (c). 

7 (b) CONGRESSIONAL RELATIONS TEAM.—In carrying 

8 out the pilot program under subsection (a), the Secretary 

9 shall establish a dedicated congressional relations team at 

10 the location specified in subsection (d). Such team shall 

11 consist of employees of the Department of Veterans Af12 fairs whose only duties relate to assisting Members and 

13 committees of Congress with respect to casework issues 

14 at each health care system of the Department in such loca15 tion. 

16 (c) USE OF SPACE.—Upon request of any Member 

17 of Congress from the State of the location specified in sub18 section (d), the Secretary shall authorize the Member to 

19 use a facility of the Department at such location for the 

20 purposes of meeting with constituents of the Member. 

21 (d) LOCATION.—The Secretary shall carry out the 

22 pilot program in Arizona, including at the Phoenix health 

23 care system of the Department. 

24 (e) REPORT.—Not later than two years after the date 

25 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

26 to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 80 IH

1 Representatives and the Senate a report on the pilot pro2 gram under subsection (a), including whether the Sec3 retary recommends expanding such pilot program. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-20144 Summary Calendar

__________________
DAVID RAY CONLEY, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TDCJ-INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES; BOB OWEN; JAMES LYNAUGH; BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES LEGAL DEPARTMENT; DANNIL GURRIA, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA H 95-1115

- - - - - - - - - - June 20, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Ray Conley, III, Texas state prisoner #528079, appeals from the district court's dismissal of his civil rights complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Conley argues that he was denied release on parole and set-off for later reviewNo. 96-20144 -2- without explanation, that the duration of his sentence was unconstitutionally extended by the denial of parole, that he had been harmed by the overcrowded condition of the prison, that he had not been compensated for work he had performed in prison, and that he had been directed to perform unsafe work in violation of Ruiz v. Estelle , 503 F. Supp. 1265 (S.D. Tex. 1980), aff'd in part and vacated in part , 679 F.2d 1115, amended in part and vacated in part , 688 F.2d 266 (5th Cir. 1982), cert. denied , 460 U.S. 1042 (1983). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons given by the district court.
AFFIRMED.