### Instructions for filling the Emission Test Template

This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fue burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. Constituents of concern are: Carbon Monoxide, Formaldehyde, Methane, Speciated Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), Speciated Semi Dioxide, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Cyanide, Nitrogen Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). You must complete 3 separate sampling events for each of the requested constituents. intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of this spreadsheet. Fields shaded in yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in light green are populated using drop down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Information worksheet. Please Do Not modify the structure of this spreadsheet by adding or subtracting rows, columns, cells. Please name each resulting spreadsheet with the following naming convention: [FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

Please refer to the following steps when using these spreadsheets.

Boiler Information Worksheet

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet. 2. Please enter the control device configuration.

Emission Data Worksheets

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. F example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg Ontario

- Hydro Method was used, you would need to enter Hg0

### , HgP, and Hg+2 

### . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic HAP and Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAP worksheets allow you to use a drop

-down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these worksheets:

Boiler Operation Information

1. Please determine which units of measure (acfm or dscfm) were used for Exhaust Flow Rate and which units of measure (deg C or deg F) were used for Exhaust Temperature. Fill these units of measure into the Units of Measure field. 2. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of the 3 sample testing periods in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. 3. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

Fuel Information

1. Please enter what types of fuel are being used in your boiler using the drop

-downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You
may enter up to 4 fuel types. Then, enter the input rate of each fuel in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. If yo are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

### are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

2. Please enter the unit of measure using the drop down provided. 3. Please enter the test method used to determine the fuel input rate. 4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

Emission Data

1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each of the 3 samples in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million BTU) and ppmvd @ 7% O 2 

### (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please also enter these data.

### This Information Collection Request (ICR) spreadsheet is intended to collect information about emission data from fossil fue l burning power plants and which test methods were used to do so for cases where the test methods are not currently supported by the Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT). This spreadsheet should only be used if the method is not in the ERT or if you do not have access to a lab which performs methods that are in the ERT. Constituents of concern are: Carbon Monoxide, Formaldehyde, Methane, Speciated Volatile Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs), Speciated Semi

-Volatile Organic HAPs, Sulfur Dioxide, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Cyanide, Nitrogen Oxides, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS), and Total Suspended Solids (TSS). You must complete 3 separate sampling events for each of the requested constituents. This spreadsheet is intended to be used for one boiler of one facility. Data for multiple boilers should be handled by using separate copies of

Fields shaded in yellow are required. All cells that are shaded in light green are populated using drop

down lists. You do not need to populate cells shaded in gray, as they are automatically populated from the Boiler Please Do Not modify the structure of this spreadsheet by adding or subtracting rows, columns,

[FacilityID]_Unit_[BoilerID]_EmisTestMethods.xls (example: 8100_Unit_2_EmisTestMethods.xls).

1. Please enter the EIA Facility Code, Facility Name and Boiler ID of your boiler on the Boiler Information worksheet.

The emission data worksheets are provided for each constituent or constituent family required for this analysis. On each spreadsheet, you must enter boiler operating information during sampling, fuel input information, and emission test results. There are generally 1 to 3 emission test results records to be entered depending on the constituent or constituent family. For example, CO only requires 1 record with 3 sample events, while Mercury requires that you enter both Hg0 

### and Hg+2

### , or if the . However, both the Speciated Volatile Organic down provided in the Constituent field to define as many records as needed to record each HAP that you have results for. General instructions follow for these

1. Please determine which units of measure (acfm or dscfm) were used for Exhaust Flow Rate and which units of measure (deg C or deg F) were used for Exhaust Temperature. Fill these units of measure into the Units of Measure field. 2. Please provide the values of all requested parameters for each of the 3 sample testing periods in the Sample 1, Sample 2,

3. Please provide any other supporting information or comments in the Other Supporting Information field.

downs in the Fuel Type Selection field. You
may enter up to 4 fuel types. Then, enter the input rate of each fuel in the Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3 fields. If yo u are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

### are not burning one or more of the fuel types entered in one or more samples, then enter an input rate of zero.

4. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field.

1. Some constituents ask for the emission rate results of each of the 3 samples in two different units of measure, while others do not. If emission rate results are requested in two different units of measure (ex. lb/MMBtu (Pounds per million (parts per million by volume dry basis at 7 percent oxygen)), you are required to provide both. 2. Please provide the test method used. This may or may not match the example given in the Test Method Used field. Please ensure that the name includes the owning organization of the test method (ex. U.S. EPA Method 0010). 3. Please provide any other information that you feel may be important in the Other Supporting Information field. 4. If data sheets and QA/QC documentation tables are provided for the test method you are entering data for please alsoEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID

22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8Control Device ConfiguratonEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing Load (Mwe) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Opacity (%) Fuel Input (GPM) Dust Collecto (Delta P)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 3

Emission Test Results CO Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) CO Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) CO Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu)Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting

Information

CO Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) CO Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) CO Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Method 10A) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing Load (Mwe) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Opacity (%) Fuel Input (GPM) Dust Collecto (Delta P)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate

Sample 3

Emission Test Results Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Formaldehyde

Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu)Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting

Information

Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Formaldehyde Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Formaldehyde

Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Method 320)Other Supporting

InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/24/2010 2/24/2010 Load 60.3 60.2 Total Heat Input 693.7 692.1 Opacity 3.9 3.54 Fuel Input 76.666 76.492

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C) 76.666 76.492

Emission Test Results Methane Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Methane Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) 7.86E-04 1.32Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/24/2010 60.2 MW e 688.6 MMBtu/hr 4.45 % 76.111 GPM

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting Information 76.111 gallon/m inute gas fuel meter

Methane Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Methane Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Methane Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Methane Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) 2.48E-03 4.18 4.62E-04 0.78Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA Method 18) Other Supporting Information U.S. EPA Method 18 ADL for AllEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing Load (Mwe) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Opacity (%) Fuel Input (GPM) Dust Collecto (Delta P)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate Sample 3

Emission Test Results SO2 Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu)Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting Information

SO2 Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) SO2 Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Method 6)Other Supporting

InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/23/2010 2/23/2010 Load 60.5 60.2 Total Heat Input 702.7 691.1 Opacity 2.6 2.7 Fuel Input 77.67 76.384

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C) 77.67 76.384

Emission Test Results Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Total Vapor Phase

Mercury Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) 4.97E-08 5.18E-08



### Data Sheets and QA

/QC Documentation

trap ID Section 1 Run 1 A 62592 31.24 Run 1 B 57609 5.51 Run 2 A 64254 27.36 Run 2 B 57583 6.81 Run 3 A 62687 29.95 Run 3 B 57592 6.63

Start Run 1 A 2/23/2010 8:43 Run 1 B 2/23/2010 8:43 Run 2 A 2/23/2010 16:25 Run 2 B 2/23/2010 16:25

Run ID Test Date Run Time Summary of Hg Collected on Sorbent Traps via Method 30B

Run ID Appartioned Mass (ng)

Individual Sorbent Tube Emission Summary, Method 30BRun 3 A 2/23/2010 21:30

Run 3 B 2/23/2010 21:30 Averages

Average R Vol. diff (%) Run 1 A 0.1616 113.9 Run 1 B 0.1555 109.6 Run 2 A 0.1355 95.5 Run 2 B 0.1356 95.5 Run 3 A 0.1334 94.7 Run 3 B 0.1288 90.7

% Lim it Run 1 A 3.265044814 Run 1 B 18.51179673 Run 2 A 3.728070175 Run 2 B 14.97797357 Run 3 A 3.405676127 Run 3 B 15.38461538

Run ID Sorbent Trap Breakthrough (B)

≤10% of Section 1 Hg

mass for Hg conc. >1
μg/dscm: or ≤20% of Section 1 for Hg conc. ≤1 μg/dscm Summary of M30B Quality A ssurance Checks
Run ID Volum e Sam pled (dscm)Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/23/2010 60.1 MW e 691.8 MMBtu/hr 2.9 % 76.462 GPM

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting

Information 76.462 gallon/m inute gas fuel meter

Total Vapor Phase Mercury Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA Method 30B) Other Supporting

Information 6.09E-08 U.S. EPA Method 30B DLL- All section two portions of the 30B trap were non-detect and the MDL of 1.02 was used to calculate emissions

Total Mass (ng) Section 2 Sections 1+2 (ng) (ug)

1.02 32.26 20 12.26 12260 1.02 6.53 0 6.53 6530 1.02 28.38 20 8.38 8380 1.02 7.83 0 7.83 7830 1.02 30.97 20 10.97 10970 1.02 7.65 0 7.65 7650

Stop per tube per run per tube per run

10:43 6.40E-14 4.97E-14 10:43 3.54E-14 4.97E-14 18:25 5.35E-14 5.18E-14 18:25 5.00E-14 5.18E-14 Run Time Hg Emissions(lb/Tbtu) Hg Emissions (lb/hr) Summary of Hg Collected on Sorbent Traps via Method 30B Initial Spike (ng) Total Non-spike

Individual Sorbent Tube Emission Summary, Method 30B23:30 7.07E-14 6.09E-14 23:30 5.11E-14 6.09E-14 5.41333E-14 #DIV/0!

Lim it Abs. diff. % Lim it Not sure why this spreadsheet is setup to calculate paired trap with lb/Tbtu units. It should be calculated in ug/dscm so the alternative criteria can be assessed. All three runs met the alternative calculation for paired trap agreement

C rec R (%) by Run R (%) by

program Lim it

115 1.96E-14 16.09195402 ≤20% of field recovery

test 2.86E-14 28.77263581

Measured Spike Recovery ( R )

127
115 Average Recovery

, between 85 and 115% 103 ≥ 10 % RD mass for Hg conc. >1 μg/dscm: or ≤20% RD or ≤0.2 μg/dscm abs.diff. for Hg conc. ≤1μg/dscm 3.5E-15 3.381642512 Summary of M30B Quality A ssurance Checks Paired Trap Agreement (RD)DLL- All section two portions of the 30B trap were non-detect and the MDL of 1.02 was used to calculate emissions

per tube per run Hg Emissions (lb/yr)*#DIV/0!

Not sure why

this spreadsheet is setup to calculate paired trap with lb/Tbtu units. It should be calculated in ug/dscm so the alternative criteria can be assessed. All three runs met the alternative calculation for paired trap agreementEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Load Total Heat Input Opacity Fuel Input

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Mercury Species Me rcury Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Hg 0 Hg +2 Hg PSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

MW e MMBtu/hr % GPM

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting

Information

Mercury Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Mercury Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Test Method Used

(ex. ASTM Method D6784) Other Supporting InformationEIA Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delmarva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing 2/24/2010 2/24/2010 Load 60.3 60.2 Total Heat Input 693.7 692.1 Opacity 3.9 3.54 Fuel Input 76.666 76.492

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C) 76.666 76.492

Compound (use drop dow n to define for as many

rows as needed) Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample

1 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic HAP

Emission Rate Sample

1 (ppmvd @ 7%O2) Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) 5.32232E-06 5.95 Chloromethane 9.75721E-06 10.91 Vinyl chloride 2.21767E-06 2.48 Bromomethane 1.84216E-05 20.60 Chloroethane 4.83423E-06 5.41 Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) 9.42586E-06 10.54 Acetone (2-Propanone) 2.09E-04 233.19 1,1-Dichloroethylene 4.8786E-06 5.46 Iodomethane 3.7731E-06 4.22 Carbon disulfide 3.54859E-06 3.97 Methylene Chloride (Dichloromethane) 2.57E-04 287.15 1,1-Dichloroethane 2.21767E-06 2.48 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 4.8786E-06 5.46 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 4.8786E-06 5.46 Chloroform 2.21767E-06 2.48 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.21724E-06 3.60 Methyl Ethyl Ketone (2-Butanone) 4.7135E-05 52.71 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 2.66116E-06 2.98 Carbon Tetrachloride 3.10488E-06 3.47 Benzene 2.4479E-05 27.37 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.10488E-06 3.47 1,2-Dichloropropane 2.66116E-06 2.98 Trichloroethylene 2.66116E-06 2.98 Dibromomethane 2.66116E-06 2.98 Bromodichloromethane 2.21767E-06 2.48 Speciated Volatile Organic HAP Emission Datacis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.21767E-06 2.48

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.97153E-06 3.32 Dibromochloromethane 3.13951E-06 3.51 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 2.30619E-05 25.79 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 2.37303E-05 26.54 Toluene 2.05852E-05 23.02 Ethylene Dibromide 2.66116E-06 2.98 Tetrachloroethylene 3.10488E-06 3.47 Chlorobenzene 2.66116E-06 2.98 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 2.66116E-06 2.98 Ethylbenzene 2.77353E-06 3.10 m / p-Xylene 3.77907E-06 4.23 Styrene 2.66116E-06 2.98 o-Xylene 3.10488E-06 3.47 Bromoform 2.21767E-06 2.48 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 9.31349E-06 10.41 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 3.54837E-06 3.97 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.10488E-06 3.47 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.10488E-06 3.47 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.10488E-06 3.47Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information 2/24/2010 60.2 MWe 688.6 MMBtu/hr 4.45 % 76.111 GPM

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting

Information 76.111 gallon/minute gas fuel meter

Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic

HAP Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7%O2) Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Volatile Organic

HAP Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7%O2) 6.620E-06 7.40 5.924E-06 6.62 1.486E-05 16.62 1.093E-05 12.23 2.736E-06 3.06 2.461E-06 2.75 2.212E-05 24.73 1.902E-05 21.27 6.135E-06 6.86 5.422E-06 6.06 1.192E-05 13.32 1.048E-05 11.72 1.959E-04 219.08 2.030E-04 227.04 6.179E-06 6.91 5.467E-06 6.11 4.326E-06 4.84 3.919E-06 4.38 4.193E-06 4.69 3.875E-06 4.33 3.369E-04 376.78 4.179E-04 467.27 2.736E-06 3.06 2.461E-06 2.75 6.179E-06 6.91 5.467E-06 6.11 6.179E-06 6.91 5.467E-06 6.11 2.736E-06 3.06 2.461E-06 2.75 3.178E-06 3.55 2.825E-06 3.16 5.914E-05 66.13 5.193E-05 58.07 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.752E-06 4.20 3.418E-06 3.82 2.502E-05 27.98 2.323E-05 25.98 3.752E-06 4.20 3.418E-06 3.82 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 2.736E-06 3.06 2.461E-06 2.752.736E-06 3.06 2.461E-06 2.75

3.751E-06 4.19 3.326E-06 3.72 2.692E-06 3.01 2.415E-06 2.70 2.957E-05 33.06 2.597E-05 29.04 3.001E-05 33.56 2.642E-05 29.55 1.839E-05 20.57 1.739E-05 19.45 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.752E-06 4.20 3.418E-06 3.82 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.970E-06 4.44 3.783E-06 4.23 3.310E-06 3.70 2.962E-06 3.31 3.752E-06 4.20 3.418E-06 3.82 2.736E-06 3.06 2.461E-06 2.75 1.192E-05 13.32 1.048E-05 11.72 4.326E-06 4.84 3.919E-06 4.38 3.752E-06 4.20 3.418E-06 3.82 3.752E-06 4.20 3.418E-06 3.82 3.752E-06 4.20 3.418E-06 3.82Test Method Used Other Supporting Information

U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDLU.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B ADL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B DLL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDL U.S. EPA Method 0031 with SW-846 Method 8260B BDLEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Load Total Heat Input Opacity Fuel Input

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C)

Compound (use drop down to define for as many rows as needed) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Am inoazobenzene Speciated Semi Volatile Organic HAP Emission DataSample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

MW e MMBtu/hr % GPM

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu)Other Supporting Information

Semi-Volatile Organic HAP Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method UsedOther Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Date of Testing 2/24/2010 2/24/2010 2/24/2010 Load 60.3 60.2 60.2 Total Heat Input 693.7 692.1 688.6 Opacity 3.9 3.54 4.45 Fuel Input 76.666 76.492 76.111

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2 Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 No.6 Fuel Oil (residual or bunker C) 76.666 76.492 76.111

Emission Test Results Hydrogen Cyanide Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) Hydrogen Cyanide

Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Hydrogen Cyanide

Emission Rate Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) 0.00002 0.00002 0.00012Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

MW e MMBtu/hr % GPM

Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method gallon/m inute gas fuel meter

Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA

Conditional Test Method 033) Other Supporting Information U.S. EPA Conditional Test Method 033 (CTM-033) BDLOther Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Load (Mwe) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Opacity (%) Fuel Input (GPM) Dust Collecto (Delta P)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent Consitutent Emission Rate Sample 1 (%)
O 2 CO 2Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method Other Supporting Information

Consitutent Emission Rate

Sample 2 (%) Consitutent Emission Rate Sample 3 (%) Test Method Used

(ex. U.S. EPA

Method 3B) Other Supporting InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Load (Mwe) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Opacity (%) Fuel Input (GPM) Dust Collecto (Delta P)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 1 (lb/MMBtu) NO NO 2Sample 3 Unit of Measure Other Supporting Information

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate

Sample 1 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 2 (lb/MMBtu) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 2 (ppmvd @ 7% O2)Other Supporting Information

Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate

Sample 3 (lb/MMBtu) Nitrogen Oxides Emission Rate Sample 3 (ppmvd @ 7% O2) Test Method Used (ex. U.S. EPA

Method 7)Other Supporting

InformationEIA

Facility Code Facility Name Boiler ID 22 Delm arva Vienna Power Plant 8

Parameter Sample 1 Sample 2 Date of Testing Load (Mwe) Total Heat Input (MMBtu/hr) Opacity (%) Fuel Input (GPM) Dust Collecto (Delta P)

Fuel Type Selection Fuel Input Rate Sample 1 Fuel Input Rate Sample 2

Emission Test Results Constituent Constituent Emission Rate Sample 1 (mg solids/liter) Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Total Suspended Solids (TSS)Sample 3 Unit of Measure

1000 lb/hr MMBtu/hr N/A %

Fuel Input Rate Sample 3 Unit of Measure

Constituent Emission Rate

Sample 2 (mg solids/liter) Constituent Emission Rate Sample 3 (mg solids/liter)Other Supporting Information

Fuel Flow Measurement Method

Test Method Used (ex. Standard Test Method for Filterable and Nonfilterable Matter in Water ASTM D5907)Other Supporting

Information

Other Supporting Information