alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; NEI Research Project Grant Applications (R21).
    Date: July 17-18, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Division of 
Extramural Research, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 1300, Rockville, MD 
20892, 301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#553d3a263d3422371538343c397b3b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="472f28342f263025072a262e2b69292e2f69202831">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.867, 
Vision Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 6, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-12528 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7954 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2020 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 

Conservation Act of 1998. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 7954 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tropical Forest and 

3 Coral Reef Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2020’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 806(d) of the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef 

6 Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d(d)) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following new paragraphs: 

8 ‘‘(9) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2021. 

9 ‘‘(10) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2022. 

10 ‘‘(11) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2023. 

11 ‘‘(12) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2024. 

12 ‘‘(13) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2025.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### OLYMPIA ROOFING CO., INC. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, etc., et al., Leonard B. Levy, Individually.

No. 54508.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Olympia Roofing Co., Inc. applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 288 So.2d 670.

Denied. No error of law.
#### Edward Michael COHEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-352.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Nov. 10, 1969.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and Edward G. Helvenston, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and J. Terrell Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Johnson v. State, Fla. 1967, 202 So.2d 852; Echols v. State, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 89; Sutherland v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 167 So.2d 236; Rinehart v. State, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 487.

McCAIN, REED, and OWEN, JJ., concur.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 2/28/2023 | Document No. 607052 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., )

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., )

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER GRANTING SECOND AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On February 28, 2023, non-party Valve Corporation (“Valve”) filed a motion to extend 

the time for it to file a motion to quash or limit a subpoena served on Valve by Federal Trade 

Commission Complaint Counsel (“Motion”). Valve states that Complaint Counsel and Valve are 

engaged in ongoing negotiations as to the scope of document production and that further 

negotiations may narrow or eliminate areas of dispute. Valve further states that Complaint 

Counsel agrees to the extension requested in the Motion. 

Upon review and consideration of the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that Valve’s deadline to file a motion to quash or to limit Complaint Counsel’s 

subpoena is extended to March 6, 2023. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: February 28, 2023
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 24.4

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                 DANIEL B. WARD


        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, Daniel B. Ward
constitutes and appoints David T. Howard or Steven H. Moger his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and
all capacities, to sign the Form 10-KSB of Nutraceutix, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, and any amendments or
supplements thereto, and to file this Power of Attorney and the Form 10-KSB with
all exhibits thereto, and to the documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ National Market System,
granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and
perform each requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, may do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

        Dated this 23rd day of March, 2001.

Signature:



/s/ Daniel B. Ward
------------------------------------
Daniel B. Ward



                                       26
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Cleveland Curtis SHAW.

No. 60367.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Cleveland Curtis Shaw applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. The relator is not entitled to a transcript upon the showing made.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Shayne Daniel Afzal, Appellant

No. 06

- 17

- 00228

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 124th District Court of Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 45145

- B ). Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Shayne Daniel Afzal, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEM BER 14, 2018
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
No. 00-820.

#### Wyvill et al. *v.*United Companies Life Insurance Co. et al.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         175,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  320,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               507,228
<PP&E>                                         116,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,368,723
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344,934
<BONDS>                                         38,787
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    464,600
<COMMON>                                        29,387
<OTHER-SE>                                     491,015
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,368,723
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,518,253
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,140,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                355,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   355,856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Personal Communication with RMA, Tracey Norberg on the Management of off-Specification Tires

FROM: Tab Tesnau Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

In follow up to the meeting of September 13, 2011, Tab Tesnau contacted Tracey Norberg RMA Senior Vice President and Corporate Council to explain how offspecification tires (and tire components) are managed at the tire manufacturing facility

and their downstream di stribution partners.

The following was information provided by RMA on a phone call. These are not exact

quotes.

• “Factory scrap” or “off-specification” ti res are contractually arranged to be collected, managed, and transported be tween a tire manufacturer (including retailers or other parties i nvolved in the distribution a nd sale of new tires) and a combustor. This would prevent disposal.

• The tire manufacturers, as well as th e manufacturers’ downstream distribution channels, have these contractual arrangeme nts with combustors, typically cement kilns, due to the high hea ting value and beneficial contribution to the cement production.

• Off-specification tires (incl uding factory scrap tires), which include whole tires and tire components that do not meet manu facturer specifications, are collected at tire manufacturing facilities or manuf acturer’s downstream distribution channels—retailers and other parties invol ved in the distributi on and sale of new

tires.

• If at any point in the process, a tire com ponent or whole tire is not suitable for use as a vehicle tire, it is separated from th e other tire components (or whole tires) and is stored in a protected environment in order to accumulate a sufficient quantity for shipment. The management of these tires is tightly cont rolled. Proprietary information could be collected by competitors by analyzing the factory scrap tire components, particularly from the unc ured components (not yet vulcanizedthrough heat and pressure), so the tires ar e stored in a safe manner, in part, to prevent theft.

• These tires are generated at a tire manufact urer (including retaile rs or other parties

involved in the distribution a nd sale of new tires). The term “tire manufacturers” is broadly interpreted to include retailers and other parties that are involved in the

distribution and sa le of new tires.
262 La. 307

#### Robert E. O’DELL v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY.

No. 52589.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 22, 1972.

In re: Robert E. O’Dell applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 262 So.2d 101.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the recoi'd in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### Willie S. COOLEY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO et al.

No. 60344.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Willie S. Cooley applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 346 So.2d 1352.

Writ denied.
#### Alfred TEATE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1431.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
June 10, 2008

				DIAMOND HILL FUNDS

			    Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund
                          Diamond Hill Small-Mid Cap Fund
			    Diamond Hill Large Cap Fund
			     Diamond Hill Select Fund
			   Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund
                      Diamond Hill Financial Long-Short Fund
			Diamond Hill Strategic Income Fund


Supplement to Prospectus Dated April 30, 2008


Effective June 30, 2008, the Diamond Hill Long-Short Fund will close to new
investors.  Additional investments, however, are permitted under the following
circumstances:

   -    Shareholders of record on June 30, 2008 may continue to add to their
    	existing accounts through the purchase of additional shares and through
	the reinvestment of dividends and/or capital gain distributions on any
	shares owned.

   -	Participants in a qualified defined contribution retirement plan, such
	as a 401(k), profit sharing or money purchase plan, 403(b) plan or 457
	plan that invests through existing accounts in the Fund or through a
	financial intermediary.  You may open new accounts in that plan if the
	Fund is an investment option.

   -	Financial advisors, with existing client accounts in the Fund, who are
	investing through asset allocation based investment programs of certain
	pre-approved financial intermediaries may be allowed to purchase shares
	for new and existing clients.  However, financial advisers who advertise
	or communicate broadly the availability of the closed fund may not be
	permitted to purchase additional shares.

The Fund reserves the right to make future additional exceptions that, in the
judgment of the Adviser, do not adversely affect its ability to manage the Fund
effectively.  For example, the Fund may elect to accept new defined contribution
plans that provide regular cash flows which may be beneficial to the Fund.  The
Fund also reserves the right to reject any purchase or refuse any exception,
including those detailed above, that the Adviser feels will adversely affect its
ability to manage the Fund effectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
     WHY NOT?, INC. December 31, 1996 financial statements and is
     qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000866458
<NAME>                        WHY NOT?, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (1,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)February 22, 2013(Date of earliest event reported)February 20, 2013





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---




Item 5.02Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.On February 20, 2013, Gerald B. Smith notified us of his decision, due to other commitments, to resign from the board of directors of ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C. (“ONEOK Partners GP”), a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. and our sole general partner, on May 22, 2013.  On that date, the number of members of the board of directors of ONEOK Partners GP will be reduced to eight from nine.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:February 22, 2013By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer








3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6606

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JUANITA WALKER COOPER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-92-108, CA-00-1288) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 28, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Juanita Walker Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy,Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Juanita Walker Cooper seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cooper , Nos. CR-92-108; CA-00-1288 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a California Corporation, Appellant, v. Melba I. CORY, as Surviving Widow of Fay C. Cory, Deceased, Appellee. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a California Corporation, Appellant, v. Melba I. CORY, as Executrix of the Estate of Fay C. Cory, Deceased, Appellee.

Nos. 72-458, 72-459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1973.

*105PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

We have considered appellant’s Petition for Rehearing and find it to be without merit.

As concerns appellant’s plaint that it has been constitutionally deprived because we disposed of the appeal without an opinion other than the word “Affirmed” we point it to the case of Taylor v. Knight, Fla.App.1970, 234 So.2d 156.

Denied.

WALDEN, CROSS, MAGER, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350 Certification ofChief Executive Officer**

**Furnished Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Versant Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, NICK ORDON, asChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company for the annual period covered by the Report.

 

 
| /s/ Nick Ordon                                                       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Nick Ordon  President and Chief Executive Officer  February 14, 2005 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 hasbeen provided to Versant Corporation and will be retained by VersantCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----