### 71009 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

How To File a Complaint of

Discrimination

To file a complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, which may be accessed online at http:// www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ docs/2012/Complain

_ combined

_ 6

_ 8

_ 12.pdf, or write a letter signed by you or your authorized representative.

Send your completed complaint form or letter to USDA by mail, fax, or email:

Mail

U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410

Fax

(202) 690–7442

Email

program.intake@usda.gov

Persons with disabilities who require
alternative means for communication (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.),
should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD).

Additional Public Notification

FSIS will announce this rule online through the FSIS Web page located at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations

_ &

_ policies/Interim

_ &

_Final

_ Rules/ index.asp.

FSIS will also make copies of this Federal Register publication available through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal Register notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of
information that could affect or would
be of interest to constituents and stakeholders. The Update is communicated via Listserv, a free electronic mail subscription service for industry, trade groups, consumer interest groups, health professionals,
and other individuals who have asked to be included. The Update is also available on the FSIS Web page. In addition, FSIS offers an electronic mail subscription service which provides
automatic and customized access to selected food safety news and
information. This service is available at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/News

_ &

_ Events/Email

_ Subscription/. Options range from recalls to export information to regulations, directives and notices.
Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves, and have the option to password protect their

accounts. Done at Washington, DC on: November 25,

2014
Alfred V. Almanza, Acting Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2014–28269 Filed 11–28–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P**

**DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES**
**SAFETY BOARD**

**10 CFR Part 1708**

**Procedures for Safety Investigations**

**AGENCY :**  Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) is promulgating a final rule which establishes procedures for conducting preliminary and formal safety investigations of events or practices at Department of Energy (DOE) defense
nuclear facilities that the Board determines have adversely affected, or may adversely affect, public health and safety. The Board’s experience in conducting formal safety investigations necessitates codifying the procedures set forth in this final rule. Among other benefits, these procedures will ensure a more efficient investigative process, protect confidential and privileged safety information, and promote uniformity of future safety investigations. The rule also promotes public awareness through greater transparency in the conduct of Board investigations.

**DATES :**  This rule is effective December 1,

2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  John G. Batherson, Associate General Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004, telephone (202) 694–7018, facsimile (202) 208–6518, email JohnB@dnfsb.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Background

On July 27, 2012, the Board published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (77 FR 44174). The Board initially provided a 30-day public comment period for the proposed rule, and then extended the comment period an additional 30 days to September 26, 2012 (77 FR 51943). Subsequent to publication of the proposed rule and disposition of comments, but before the final rule was published, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 amended the Board’s enabling legislation on January 2, 2013. The NDAA amendments required the Board to further modify the proposed rule. On August 11, 2014, the Board published a second notice of proposed rule in the Federal Register (79 FR 46720). The second notice of proposed rule incorporated changes necessitated by those NDAA
amendments.

The Board is responsible for making recommendations to the Secretary of Energy and the President as the Board determines are necessary to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety at DOE defense nuclear facilities.
The Board is vested with broad authority pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2286a(b)(2) to investigate events or practices which have adversely affected, or may adversely affect, public health and safety at DOE’s defense nuclear
facilities. The Board is authorized to promulgate this final rule pursuant to its enabling legislation in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, at 42 U.S.C. 2286b(c), which states that the Board may prescribe regulations to carry out its responsibilities. The final rule
establishes a new Part 1708 in the Board’s regulations, setting forth procedures governing the conduct of safety investigations.

It is imperative that Board investigators be able to obtain information from witnesses necessary to form an understanding of the underlying causes that adversely affect, or may adversely affect, public health and safety at DOE defense nuclear
facilities. Frank communications are critical if Board investigators are to be
effective. The Board must also be viewed as uncompromising in maintaining non-disclosure of privileged safety information. The Board must be able to assure complete confidentiality in order to encourage
future witnesses to come forward.

The Board requires the discretion to
offer individuals enforceable assurances of confidentiality in order to encourage their full and frank testimony. Without such authority, individuals may refrain from providing the Board with vital information affecting public health and safety, frustrating the efficient operation of the Board’s oversight mission. To encourage candor and facilitate the free flow of information, the Board adopted in the proposed rule procedures to protect confidential statements from
disclosure to the maximum extent permitted under existing law.

The Board received two formal comments on the July 27, 2012, (77 FR 44174) proposed rule: An email comment from Mr. Richard L. Urie, dated September 4, 2012, and a letter from Mr. Eric Fygi, DOE Deputy General


### 71010 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

Counsel, dated September 26, 2012,
submitted on behalf of DOE. The Board
also became aware of additional commentary from Mr. Larry Brown, a former Board Member, published in the ‘‘Weapons Complex Monitor.’’ This commentary was not sent to the Board’s contact point noticed in the proposed rule. However, the Board, in its discretion, decided to treat this commentary as having been submitted directly to the Board as a comment. The Board carefully considered each comment received, and made modifications to the proposed rule in response where appropriate. These modifications were published in the August 11, 2014, (79 FR 46720) second notice of proposed rule, along with a discussion of the disposition of comments received from the initial July 27, 2012, proposed rule and a request
for additional comments. The Board
received no additional comments on the second notice of proposed rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. The rule addresses only the procedures to be followed in safety investigations. Accordingly, the Board has determined that a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

For purposes of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, the rule would not significantly or uniquely affect small governments and would not result in increased expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (as adjusted for inflation).

Executive Order 12866

In issuing this regulation, the Board has adhered to the regulatory philosophy and the applicable principles of regulation as set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. This rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under that
Executive Order since it is not a significant regulatory action within the meaning of the Executive Order.

Executive Order 12988

The Board has reviewed this regulation in light of section 3 of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and certifies that it meets the applicable standards provided therein. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because this regulation does
not contain information collection requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and Budget. The Board expects the collection of information that is called for by the regulation would involve fewer than 10 persons each year.

Congressional Review Act

The Board has determined that this rulemaking does not involve a rule within the meaning of the Congressional

Review Act.

List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1708

Administrative practice, Procedure, and Safety investigations.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board adds a new Part 1708 to 10 CFR chapter XVII to read as follows:

**PART 1708—PROCEDURES FOR**
**SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS**

Sec. 1708.100 Authority to conduct safety investigations. 1708.101 Scope and purpose of safety investigations. 1708.102 Types of safety investigations. 1708.103 Request to conduct safety investigations. 1708.104 Confidentiality of safety investigations and privileged safety
information. 1708.105 Promise of confidentiality. 1708.106 Limitation on participation. 1708.107 Powers of persons conducting formal safety investigations. 1708.108 Cooperation: Ready access to facilities, personnel, and information. 1708.109 Rights of witnesses in safety investigations. 1708.110 Multiple interests. 1708.111 Sequestration of witnesses. 1708.112 Appearance and practice before
the Board. 1708.113 Right to submit statements. 1708.114 Official transcripts. 1708.115 Final report of safety investigation. 1708.116 Procedure after safety investigations.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2286b(c); 42 U.S.C. 2286a(b)(2); 44 U.S.C. 3101–3107, 3301–

3303a, 3308–3314.

**§ 1708.100 Authority to conduct safety investigations.** 

(a) The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (Board) is an independent federal agency in the executive branch
of the United States Government.

(b) The Board’s enabling legislation authorizes it to conduct safety investigations pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2286a(b)(2)). **§ 1708.101 Scope and purpose of safety investigations.** 

(a) The Board shall investigate any event or practice at a Department of Energy defense nuclear facility which the Board determines has adversely affected, or may adversely affect, public health and safety.

(b) The purpose of any Board investigation shall be:

(1) To determine whether the Secretary of Energy is adequately implementing standards (including all applicable Department of Energy orders, regulations, and requirements) at Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities;

(2) To ascertain information concerning the circumstances of such event or practice and its implications for such standards;

(3) To determine whether such event or practice is related to other events or practices at other Department of Energy defense nuclear facilities; and

(4) To provide to the Secretary of Energy such recommendations for changes in such standards or the implementation of such standards (including Department of Energy orders, regulations, and requirements) and such recommendations relating to data or research needs as may be prudent or

necessary.

**§ 1708.102 Types of safety investigations.**

(a) The Board may initiate a preliminary safety inquiry or order a formal safety investigation.

(b) A preliminary safety inquiry means any inquiry conducted by the Board or its staff, other than a formal investigation. Where it appears from a preliminary safety inquiry that a formal safety investigation is appropriate, the
Board’s staff will so recommend to the
Board.

(c) A formal safety investigation is instituted by an Order of Safety Investigation issued either after a
recorded notational vote of Board Members or after convening a meeting
in accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act and voting in open or closed session, as the case may be.

(d) Orders of Safety Investigations
will outline the basis for the investigation, the matters to be investigated, the Investigating Officer(s) designated to conduct the investigation, and their authority.

(e) The Office of the General Counsel shall have primary responsibility for conducting and leading a formal safety investigation. The Investigating Officer(s) shall report to the Board.

(f) Following a notational vote and in
accordance with the Government in the Sunshine Act, the Board or an


### 71011 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

individual Board Member authorized by the Board may hold such closed or open hearings and sit and act at such times and places, and require the attendance and testimony of such witnesses and the production of such evidence as the Board or an authorized member may find advisable, or exercise any other applicable authority as provided in the Board’s enabling legislation. Each Board
Member shall have full access to all information relating to the matter under investigation, including attendance at closed hearings.

(g) Subpoenas in formal safety investigation hearings may be issued by the Chairman only after a notational vote of the Board. The Chairman may designate another Board Member to issue a subpoena. Subpoenas shall be served by any person designated by the Chairman, or otherwise as provided by
law.

(h) A determination of a decision or action authorized to the Board by these procedures shall only be made after a
notational vote of the Board with each Board Member having one vote.

**§ 1708.103 Request to conduct safety investigations.** 

(a) Any person may request that the Board perform a preliminary safety inquiry or conduct a formal safety investigation concerning a matter within the Board’s jurisdiction.

(b) Actions the Board may take regarding safety investigation requests are discretionary.

(c) The Board will offer to protect the identity of a person requesting a safety investigation to the maximum extent permitted by law.

(d) Board safety investigations are wholly administrative and investigatory
in nature and do not involve a determination of criminal culpability, adjudication of rights and duties, or other quasi-judicial determinations.

**§ 1708.104 Confidentiality of safety investigations and privileged safety** 
**information.**

(a) Information obtained during the course of a preliminary safety inquiry or a formal safety investigation may be treated as confidential, safety privileged, and non-public by the Board and its staff, to the extent permissible under existing law. The information subject to this protection includes but is not limited to: Identity of witnesses; recordings; statements; testimony; transcripts; emails; all documents, whether or not obtained pursuant to Board subpoena; any conclusions based on privileged safety information; any
deliberations or recommendations as to policies to be pursued; and all other related investigative proceedings and

activities.

(b) The Board shall have the discretion to assert the safety privilege when safety information, determined by the Board as protected from release, is sought by any private or public governmental entity or by parties to litigation who attempt to compel its
release.

(c) Nothing in this section voids or otherwise displaces the Board’s legal obligations with respect to the Freedom of Information Act, the Government in the Sunshine Act, or any procedures or requirements contained in the Board’s regulations issued pursuant to those

Acts.

**§ 1708.105 Promise of confidentiality.**

(a) The Investigating Officer(s) may give a promise of confidentiality to any individual who provides evidence for a safety inquiry or investigation to encourage frank communication.

(b) A promise of confidentiality must be explicit.

(c) A promise of confidentiality must be documented in writing.

(d) A promise of confidentiality may be given only as needed to ensure forthright cooperation of a witness and may not be given on a blanket basis to
all witnesses.

(e) A promise of confidentiality must inform the witness that it applies only to information given to the Investigating Officer(s) and not to the same information if given to others.

**§ 1708.106 Limitation on participation.**

(a) A safety investigation under this rule is not a judicial or adjudicatory proceeding.

(b) No person or entity has standing to intervene or participate as a matter of right in any safety investigation under this regulation.

**§ 1708.107 Powers of persons conducting formal safety investigations.** 

The Investigating Officer(s) appointed by the Board may take informal or formal statements, interview witnesses, take testimony, request production of documents, recommend issuance of subpoenas, recommend taking of testimony in a closed forum, recommend administration of oaths, and otherwise perform any lawful act authorized under the Board’s enabling legislation in connection with any safety investigation ordered by the Board.

**§ 1708.108 Cooperation: Ready access to facilities, personnel, and information.** 

(a) Section 2286c(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, requires the Department of Energy to fully cooperate with the Board and provide the Board with ready access to such facilities, personnel, and
information as the Board considers necessary, including ready access in connection with a safety investigation.

(b) Each contractor operating a Department of Energy defense nuclear facility under a contract awarded by the Secretary is also required, to the extent provided in such contract or otherwise with the contractor’s consent, to fully cooperate with the Board and provide the Board with ready access to such facilities, personnel, and information of
the contractor as the Board considers necessary in connection with a safety investigation.

(c) The Board may make a written request to persons or entities relevant to the safety investigation to preserve pertinent information, documents, and evidence, including electronically stored information, in order to preclude
alteration or destruction of that
information.

**§ 1708.109 Rights of witnesses in safety investigations.** 

(a) Any person who is compelled to appear in person to provide testimony or produce documents in connection with a safety investigation is entitled to be accompanied, represented, and advised by an attorney. Subpoenas in safety investigations shall issue only under signature of the Chairman or any Member of the Board designated by the Chairman. Attendance and testimony
shall be before the Board or a Member authorized by the Board.

(b) If an executive branch agency employee witness is represented by counsel from that same agency, counsel shall identify who counsel represents to determine whether counsel represents multiple interests in the safety investigation.

(c) Counsel for a witness may advise the witness with respect to any question
asked where it is claimed that the testimony sought from the witness is outside the scope of the safety investigation, or that the witness is privileged to refuse to answer a question or to produce other evidence. For these permissible objections, the witness or counsel may object on the record to the question and may state briefly and precisely the grounds therefore. If the witness refuses to answer a question, then counsel may briefly state on the
record that counsel has advised the witness not to answer the question and the legal grounds for such refusal. The
witness and his or her counsel shall not otherwise object to or refuse to answer any question, and they shall not otherwise interrupt any oral

examination.


### 71012 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

(d) When it is claimed that the witness has a privilege to refuse to answer a question on the grounds of self-incrimination, the witness must assert the privilege personally.

(e) Any objections made during the
course of examination will be treated as continuing objections and preserved throughout the further course of testimony without the necessity for repeating them as to any similar line of inquiry.

(f) Counsel for a witness may not interrupt the examination by making any unnecessary objections or
statements on the record.

(g) Following completion of the examination of a witness, such witness may make a statement on the record, and that person’s counsel may, on the record, question the witness to enable the witness to clarify any of the
witness’s answers or to offer other
evidence.

(h) The Board or any Member authorized by the Board shall take all measures necessary to regulate the course of an investigative proceeding to avoid delay and prevent or restrain
obstructionist or contumacious conduct or contemptuous language.

(i) If the Board or any Member authorized by the Board finds that counsel for a witness, or other representative, has refused to comply with his or her directions, or has engaged in obstructionism or contumacy, the Board or Member authorized by the Board may thereupon take action as the circumstances may

warrant.

(j) Witnesses appearing voluntarily do not have a right to have counsel present during questioning, although the Board or Member authorized by the Board, in
consultation with the Office of the General Counsel, may permit a witness appearing on a voluntary basis to beaccompanied by an attorney or nonattorney representative.

**§ 1708.110 Multiple interests.**

(a) If counsel representing a witness appears in connection with a safety investigation, counsel shall state on the record all other persons or entities counsel represents in that investigation.

(b) When counsel does represent more than one person or entity in a safety investigation, counsel shall inform the Investigating Officer(s) and each client of counsel’s possible conflict of interest in representing that client.

(c) When an Investigating Officer(s), or the Board, as the case may be, in
consultation with the Board’s General Counsel, has concrete evidence that the presence of an attorney representing multiple interests would obstruct or impede the safety investigation, the Investigating Officer(s) or the Board may prohibit that attorney from being present during testimony.

(d) The Board shall issue a written statement of the reasons supporting a
decision to exclude counsel under this section within five working days following exclusion. The Board shall also delay the safety investigation for a reasonable period of time to permit
retention of new counsel.

**§ 1708.111 Sequestration of witnesses.**

(a) Witnesses shall be sequestered during interviews, or during the taking of testimony, unless otherwise permitted by the Investigating Officer(s) or by the Board, as the case may be.

(b) No witness, or counsel accompanying any such witness, shall be permitted to be present during the examination of any other witness called in such proceeding, unless permitted by the Investigating Officer(s) or the Board, as the case may be.

**§ 1708.112 Appearance and practice**
**before the Board.**

(a) Counsel appearing before the Board or the Investigating Officer(s)
must conform to the standards of ethical conduct required of practitioners before
the Courts of the United States.

(b) The Board may suspend or deny, temporarily or permanently, the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Board in any way to a person
who is found:

(1) Not to possess the requisite qualifications to represent others; or

(2) To have engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct; or

(3) To have engaged in obstructionism or contumacy before the Board; or

(4) To be otherwise not qualified. (c) Obstructionist or contumacious conduct in an investigation before the Board or the Investigating Officer(s) will be grounds for exclusion of any person from such safety investigation proceedings and for summary suspension for the duration of the investigation.

(d) At the time of the finding the
Board shall issue a verbal or written statement of the reasons supporting a decision to suspend or exclude counsel for obstructionism or contumacy.

(e) A witness may have a reasonable amount of time to retain replacement counsel if original counsel is suspended
or excluded.

**§ 1708.113 Right to submit statements.**

At any time during the course of an investigation, any person may submit documents, statements of facts, or memoranda of law for the purpose of explanation or further development of
the facts and circumstances relevant to the safety matter under investigation.

**§ 1708.114 Official transcripts.**

(a) Official transcripts of witness testimony, whether or not compelled by subpoena to appear before a Board safety investigation, shall be recorded either by an official reporter or by any other person or means designated by the Investigating Officer(s) or the Board’s
General Counsel.

(b) Such witness, after completing the compelled testimony, may file a request
with the Board’s General Counsel to procure a copy of the official transcript of that witness’s testimony. The General Counsel shall rule on the request, and may deny for good cause.

(c) Good cause for denying a witness’s request to procure a transcript may include, but shall not be limited to, theprotection of a trade secret, nondisclosure of confidential or proprietary business information, security-sensitive operational or vulnerability information, safety privileged information, or the integrity of Board investigations.

(d) Whether or not a request is made, the witness and his or her attorney shall have the right to inspect the official transcript of the witness’s own testimony, in the presence of the Investigating Officer(s) or his designee, for purposes of conducting errata

review.

(e) Transcripts of testimony are
otherwise considered confidential and privileged safety information, and in no case shall a copy or any reproduction of such transcript be released to any other person or entity, except as provided in paragraph (b) above or as required under
the Freedom of Information Act or the Government in the Sunshine Act, or any procedures or requirements contained in Board regulations issued pursuant to
those Acts.

**§ 1708.115 Final report of safety investigation.** 

(a) The Board will complete a final report of the safety investigation fully setting forth the Board’s findings and
conclusions.

(b) The final report of the safety investigation is confidential and protected by the safety privilege, and is
therefore not releasable.

(c) The Board, in its discretion, may sanitize the final report of the safety investigation by redacting confidential and safety privileged information so that the report is put in a publically
releasable format.

(d) Nothing in this section voids or otherwise displaces the Board’s legal obligations with respect to compliance


### 71013 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 230 / Monday, December 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations

with the Freedom of Information Act, the Government in the Sunshine Act, or any procedures or requirements contained in the Board’s regulations issued pursuant to those Acts.

**§ 1708.116 Procedure after safety investigations.** 

(a) If a formal safety investigation results in a finding that an event or practice has adversely affected, or may adversely affect, public health and safety, the Board may take any appropriate action authorized to it under its enabling statute, including, but not limited to, making a formal recommendation to the Secretary of Energy, convening a hearing, or establishing a reporting requirement.

(b) If a safety investigation yields information relating to violations of federal criminal law involving government officers and employees, the Board shall expeditiously refer the matter to the Department of Justice for disposition.

(c) If in the course of a safety investigation, a safety issue or concern
is found to be outside the Board’s jurisdiction, that safety issue or concern shall be referred to the appropriate entity with jurisdiction for disposition.

(d) Statements made in connection with testimony provided to the Board in an investigation are subject to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1001.

Dated: November 24, 2014.

Peter S. Winokur,

Chairman.

[FR Doc. 2014–28248 Filed 11–28–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3670–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Bureau of Industry and Security**

**15 CFR Parts 730, 734, 736, 742, 744,**

**and 745**

**[Docket No. 141114962–4962–01]**

**RIN 0694–AG39**

**Updated Statements of Legal Authority for the Export Administration**  **Regulations**

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  This rule updates the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) legal authority paragraphs in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to
cite the most recent Presidential notice extending an emergency declared pursuant to the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. This is a procedural rule that only updates authority paragraphs of the EAR. It does not alter any right, obligation or prohibition that applies to any person
under the EAR.

**DATES :**  The rule is effective December 1,

2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  William Arvin, Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, Telephone: (202) 482–2440.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Background

Authority for EAR parts 730, 734, 736, 742, 744 & 745 rests, in part, on Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994—National Emergency With Respect to Weapons of Mass Destruction, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950 and on annual notices extending the emergency declared in
that executive order. This rule revises the authority paragraphs for the affected parts to cite the most recent such notice, which the President signed on November 7, 2014.

This rule is purely procedural, and makes no changes other than to revise CFR authority paragraphs for the purpose of making the authority citations current. It does not change the text of any section of the EAR, nor does it alter any right, obligation or prohibition that applies to any person
under the EAR.

Rulemaking Requirements

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). This rule does not impose any regulatory burden on the public and is consistent with the goals of Executive
Order 13563. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) (PRA), unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This rule does not involve any collection of
information.

3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that term is defined under Executive Order

13132.

4. The Department finds that there is good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) to waive the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act requiring prior notice and the opportunity for public comment because they are unnecessary. This rule only updates legal authority citations. It clarifies information and is non-discretionary. This rule does not alter any right, obligation or prohibition that applies to any person under the EAR. Because
these revisions are not substantive changes, it is unnecessary to provide notice and opportunity for public comment. In addition, the 30-day delay in effectiveness required by 5 U.S.C. 553(d) is not applicable because this
rule is not a substantive rule. Because
neither the Administrative Procedure Act nor any other law requires that notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment be given for this rule, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. ) are not applicable.

List of Subjects

15 CFR Part 730

Administrative practice and procedure, Advisory committees, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Strategic and critical
materials.

15 CFR Part 734

Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Inventions and patents, Research, Science and technology.

15 CFR Part 736

Exports.

15 CFR Part 742

Exports, Terrorism.

15 CFR Part 744

Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.

15 CFR Part 745

Administrative practice and procedure, Chemicals, Exports, Foreign trade, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Accordingly, parts 730, 734, 736, 742, 744 and 745 of the EAR (15 CFR parts 730–774) are amended as follows:

**PART 730—[AMENDED]**

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 730 is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.