alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1.1


                           AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT AND

                             PLAN OF REORGANIZATION

         This Amendment to that certain AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION,
made and entered into on this ___ day of July, 2001, in accordance with the
terms of Section 7.11 of said Agreement. The Sections to be amended are
substituted in their entirety by the designated Section(s) set forth herein.

First Amended Section:

         "Section 1.2 Capitalization. The authorized capitalization of QMT
consists of 15,000,000 Common Shares, par value $0.001 per share and 1,000,000
Preferred Shares, par value $0.001 per share. As of the Closing Date hereof, QMT
will have no more than ten million. two hundred sixty thousand (10,260,000)
Common Shares issued and outstanding. All issued and outstanding shares are
legally issued, fully paid and nonassessable and are not issued in violation of
the preemptive or other rights of any person. QMT has no other securities,
warrants or options authorized or issued."

Second Amended Section:

         "Section 3.2 Issuance of AAI Common Shares. In exchange for all of the
QMT Common Shares tendered pursuant to Section 3.1, AAI shall issue an aggregate
of 10,260,000 "restricted" AAI Common Shares to the QMT shareholders on a
share-for-share basis to their existing ownership in QMT."

Third Amended Section:

         "Section 3.2 Closing.

         (a) The closing of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement shall
be as of the date in which (i) each party hereto has executed this Agreement;
and (ii) all of the shareholders of QMT and AAI have approved the terms of this
Agreement; and (iii) all conditions to Closing referenced hereinabove, as well
as in Articles V and VI below, have been satisfied or waived by the appropriate
party and all documentation referenced herein is delivered to the respective
party herein, unless a different date is mutually agreed to in writing by the
parties hereto (the "Closing Date").

         (b) Upon execution hereof or as soon thereafter as practical, all the
current shareholders of AAI, representing 500,000 shares, shall tender their
share certificates, along with a duly executed stock power, for consideration of
$0.05 per share . Upon receipt, such shares shall be cancelled on the stock
record."

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Amendment to the AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF REORGANIZATION to be executed by their
respective

                  //

<PAGE>

officers, hereunto duly authorized, and entered into as of the date first above
written.


ABOVE AVERAGE INVESTMENTS, LTD.           QUICK-MED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


By: ____________________________          By: ______________________________
      Devinder Randhawa                         David S. Lerner
Its:  President                           Its: President
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each
of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Florida Rock Industries, Inc.

                                 JOHN D. BAKER II
                                 John D. Baker II
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer

                                 JOHN D. MILTON, JR.
                                 John D. Milton, Jr.
                                 Executive Vice President,
                                   Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                   Officer

  		                  WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                  Wallace A. Patzke, Jr.
                                    Vice President, Controller and
                                    Chief Accounting Officer

   A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Florida Rock Industries, Inc., and will
be retained by Florida Rock Industries, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

   The foregoing certification accompanies the issuer's Quarterly
   Report on Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release
   Nos. 33-8212, 34-4751 and IC-25967, dated December 31, 2006.
#### Co-Star Construction, Inc., Respondent, v Frederic C. Fray, Esq., et al., Defendants, and Strassberg & Strassberg, P. C., Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 516]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered on or about October 5, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate the note of issue, to compel a further deposition of plaintiffs president and for a ruling on the propriety of plaintiffs assertion of the attorney-client privilege, the latter denial without prejudice to an application before the Trial Justice for such a ruling, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant claims that plaintiffs improper assertion of the attorney-client privilege at its deposition and in its responses to a notice to admit has prevented completion of disclosure, and seeks to compel further disclosure from plaintiff without the impediment caused by this claim of privilege. However, plaintiffs deposition was taken almost a month before the compliance conference at which plaintiff was directed to file a note of issue within three weeks. Yet, for unexplained reasons, defendant did not mention plaintiffs claim of privilege at the compliance conference, and did not object when plaintiff was directed to file a note of issue. Under the circumstances, the *340note of issue should not be vacated in order to accommodate a request for disclosure that could have and should have been made before the note of issue was filed. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Lerner and Buckley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     95,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         67,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,289
<SALES>                                         45,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,833
<CGS>                                           39,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    543
<INCOME-TAX>                                       206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Memorandum 

August 21, 2012 

From: Colleen McKaughan, Associate Director, Air Division, Region 9 

To: File 

Subject: Confirmation from Gila River Indian Community that Consultation Regarding 2006 24-

hour PM2.5 Designation is Complete 

On February 9, 2010, April 6, 2010, and October 26, 2010, I met with the GRIC tribal council and 

the GRIC Department of Environmental Quality to consult with them regarding designation of their 

lands for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. On April 5, 2012 I met with Rudy Mix, Acting Director 

of the GRIC Department of Environmental Quality and his staff and informed them that EPA 

would be proceeding with its initial 2006 24-hour PM2.5 designation and to ask if further 

consultation was desired by the tribe. Mr. Mix confirmed that GRIC did not desire further 

consultation given that EPA's upcoming action would be a designation of 

unclassifiable/attainment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
THIS DATA HAS BEEN RESTATED AS A RESULT OF A POOLING OF INTERESTS TRANSACTION
CONSUMATED IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          84,501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  781,735
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,566
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               965,267
<PP&E>                                         308,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                 184,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,667,030 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,206,988 
<BONDS>                                         34,145 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       221,129
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,995 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,667,030
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  275,259 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,275)    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   928    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,631    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,218    
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,058    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,640    
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0    
<CHANGES>                                            0    
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,640    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08    
                                                          

</TABLE>
#### EXECUTIVE UNIFORM RENTAL, INC., Appellant, v. DANIA RIVERSIDE LAUNDRY AND LINEN SUPPLY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-1172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 29, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING 

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR 

CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND CERTAIN 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLASTS

April 2011

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc. and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
#### Santiago RODRIGUEZ and Yolanda Rodriguez, his wife, and June Carter, Appellants, v. Bruce MEEKS et al., Appellees.

No. 72-983.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 4, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120464.eng.txt[9/6/2012 9:20:10 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0464 Focus Ready Draft 8/2/2012 ENGINEER: Austin \ JAS PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER: USE:

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: gloves (examples of suitable gloves are those made by the company Kächele-Cama Latex GmbH, Am Kreuzacker 9, D-36124 Eichenzell, e-mail vertrieb@kcl.de, with subsequent specification (test according to EN374)) / Any necessity for eye protection must be determined within the scope of a risk assessment. Respirator: in case of formation of vapours/aerosols: Short term: filter apparatus, combination filter A-P2. Health Effects: Harmful if swallowed. Irritating to skin. May cause sensitization by skin contact. No harmful effects have been reported upon contact with the eyes. TLV/PEL: Iodonium, bis(4-dodecylphenyl)-, (OC-6-11)-hexafluoroantimonate(1-) 50 % 0.5 mg/m3 OSHA PELfile:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120464.eng.txt[9/6/2012 9:20:10 AM] SAT (concerns) (07/27/2012):
Migration to groundwater: rapid (anion); negl (cation) PBT rating: P3B1T2 P3B1T1 (anion); P3B1T2 (cation) Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0464 Use: Number of Sites/ Location: 5 unknown site(s) Days/yr: 250

Process Description:file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120464.eng.txt[9/6/2012 9:20:10 AM] ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Water or Incineration or Landfill Output 2: 1.6E-1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 5 sites or 2.0E+2 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill High End: 1.4E-1 kg/site-day over 17 days/yr from 5 sites or 1.2E+1 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill Conservative: 3.2E-2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 5 sites or 4.0E+1 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL 2.5E+2 kg/yr - all sitesfile:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120464.eng.txt[9/6/2012 9:20:10 AM] OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,331,716
<SECURITIES>                                 4,800,683
<RECEIVABLES>                                  559,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,098,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,907,675
<PP&E>                                         913,376
<DEPRECIATION>                                 857,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,038,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          412,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,060
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,215,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,038,432
<SALES>                                      2,969,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,110,987
<CGS>                                        1,505,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,399,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                68,516
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,642,678
<INCOME-TAX>                                   654,102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            988,576
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   988,576
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Jerry W. BALLARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee.

No. 46418.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 18, 1971.

Guy & Dowdy, McComb, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Timmie Hancock, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.1
                                     [Date]



--------------
--------------
--------------


Dear
     --------------

         In order to give you a stake in the future growth and prosperity of
Gerald Stevens, Inc. (the "Company") and to encourage you to provide outstanding
services to the Company and its subsidiaries, the Board of Directors has awarded
you, effective ___________, options to acquire ____ shares of the Company's
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share (the "Common Stock"), at an exercise
price of $_____ per share.

         The options granted to you are subject to the Gerald Stevens, Inc. 2000
Stock Option Plan (the "Stock Option Plan"), a copy of which is attached.
Options granted under the Stock Option Plan typically vest over a four year
period, with 25% of the shares vesting on the first, second, third and fourth
anniversary of the grant. This year, the Board of Directors has decided to give
a special reward to all option recipients by accelerating the vesting schedule
by one year. This means that 25% of the shares are immediately vested, 25% will
vest on the first anniversary, 25% on the second anniversary and 25% on the
third anniversary. The Board wanted to give you some current value to this grant
in appreciation of your efforts and dedication. We hope however, that you will
see the long-term potential in being an option holder of Gerald Stevens and will
continue to accumulate your shares in anticipation of their future growth and
value.

         The options have a term of ten years. Options may be exercised at any
time after they vest (until their expiration on ________) provided you remain an
employee of the Company. If you leave the Company's employ, all options whether
vested and exercisable or not vested and exercisable on the date of termination,
will expire and be forfeited as of that date.

         This letter will serve as evidence of your grant of options. Please
indicate your receipt of this letter by signing and returning it to Gerald
Stevens, Inc., P. O. Box 350526, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33335-0526, Attention:
Barbara Ann Bohlman. Sign the other copy and keep it with your Stock Option Plan
materials.

         On behalf of the Company and the Board of Directors, we appreciate your
contribution to the Company's success.

                                             Very truly yours,


                                             /s/ Art Sanders
                                             ---------------
                                             Art Sanders
                                             Vice President, Human Resources


--------------------------------
Accepted
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

49) IV-C-15 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:53 AM Sheet 49 of 232 
P.2 

TZ-C-/S' 

;4iV _ c .coo 

Honorable Lamar Smith 

U.S. House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Smith: 

Thank you for passinq along the comments of Mr. W.D. 

Stella and Texas State Representative Dudley Harrison 

concerning EPA's proposal to require onboard refueling emission 

controls. Be assured that these comments will be considered as 

we prepare our Final Rule. We will also be placing them in the 

public docket for the Rule (Docket No. A-87-11) as you 

requested. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

'•;. . ' r; f? Y 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

fee: Docket A-87-11 

bcc: Region 06 

Congressional Liaison/Deremer 
P.3 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

JAN 2 5 19'-

GENT 3JV DOCKET 

-.' y W
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6351
JERRY L. HARRELSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-174-R) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 2, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry L. Harrelson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harrelson v. Angelone , No. CA-96-174-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 24.1






                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



Onsite Energy Corporation:

         We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-8
of our report  dated  August 9, 1996  except as to Note 18 which is as of August
28, 1996,  relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements of Onsite Energy
Corporation.






                                                 HEIN + ASSOCIATES LLP
                                                 Certified Public Accountants




Orange, California
April 25, 1997