alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
261 La. 1051

#### Ray A. SMITHHART v. AAA CONTRACTING CO., Inc., et al.

No. 52469.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 18, 1972.

In re: Ray AV Smithhart applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Ascension. 260 So.2d 8.

Application denied; on the facts found by the court of appeal, the result is correct.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's unaudited condensed statements of income, condensed balance sheets and
condensed statements of cash flows and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements contained within the Company's Form 10-Q for the
three months ended May 3, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                MAY-3-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,904
<INVENTORY>                                     57,971
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,839
<PP&E>                                         192,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 342,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,260
<BONDS>                                          6,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,762
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   342,488
<SALES>                                        119,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,649
<CGS>                                           81,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (410)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   155
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,977
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,977
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
No. 00-736.

#### Sentenn *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Jackie A. STORY v. Glenn Edward STORY.

No. 49837.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 14, 1977.

Michael R. Medley, W. F. Selph, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

McLaurin, Nicols & Kelly, John C. McLaurin, Jr., Brandon, Paul Henderson, Pearl, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Rankin County; Osborn Guyton Idom, Chancellor.

Before INZER, P. J., and WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

REVERSED AND FORMER DECREE REINSTATED.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and ROBERTSON, SUGG, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AUGUST 15, 2012 

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection 

Bureau of Air Quality Planning 

Pursuant to the public hearing provisions in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 

section 102, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) is cancelling the following 

public hearing because no request for a hearing was received: 

August 15, 2012 

10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 

PEBP Board Room (St. 1002) 

901 South Stewart Street 

Carson City, Nevada 

The NDEP’s proposed revisions to Nevada’s Clean Air Act § 110(A)(2) (infrastructure) state 

implementation plans and related materials are available on the NDEP website at 

http://ndep.nv.gov/admin/public.htm, click on “Air Quality Planning.” Persons may also check 

on the status of Nevada’s SIP revision by telephone at (775) 687-9356.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE YEAR
ENDED AUGUST 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT ON 
FORM 10-K/A AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                       7,940,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,724,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                   627,142
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,480,318
<PP&E>                                       2,434,787
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,552,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,871,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,007,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,507
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,322,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,871,527
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,444,755
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               53,528,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                73,948
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,240,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,673,755
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,564,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,564,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.3

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY

STOCK PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

As Amended and Restated Effective May 24,
2005

The Massey Energy Company Stock Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated effective May 24, 2005 (the
Plan) was amended pursuant to Section 8.1 of the Plan effective June 27, 2006 as follows:



| | 1. | The following paragraph is added at the end of Section 5.3 of the Plan:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the Plan, if an Awardee ceases to be a Non-Employee Director for any reason and is immediately thereupon or thereafter elected or appointed to serve as a
Non-Employee Director, such Awardees service on the Board as a Non-Employee Director for purposes of this Plan shall be considered to continue without interruption. No forfeiture shall occur by reason of such cessation of service as a
Non-Employee Director and resumption of status as a Non-Employee Director, and Restricted Stock under the Plan outstanding at the time of such cessation and resumption shall otherwise continue to vest in accordance with the Awardees Restricted
Stock Agreement and the terms and provisions of the Plan during such continuing Board service.



| | 2. | The following paragraph is added at the end of Section 6.3 of the Plan:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Notwithstanding the foregoing or any other provision of the Plan, if an Awardee ceases to be a Non-Employee Director for any reason and is immediately thereupon or thereafter elected or appointed to serve as a
Non-Employee Director, such Awardees service on the Board as a Non-Employee Director for purposes of this Plan shall be considered to continue without interruption. No forfeiture shall occur by reason of such cessation of service as a
Non-Employee Director and resumption of status as a Non-Employee Director, and Restricted Units under the Plan outstanding at the time of such cessation and resumption shall otherwise continue to vest in accordance with the Awardees Restricted
Unit Agreement and the terms and provisions of the Plan during such continuing Board service.

As evidence of the adoption of these
amendments to the Plan, Massey Energy Company has caused this document to be signed by its undersigned officer effective this 27thday of June 2006.



MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY/s/ Richard R. GrinnanName:

Richard R. GrinnanIts:

Vice President and Corporate Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                     3,369
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             33,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                               12,943
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          49,559
<PP&E>                                                 3,832,076
<DEPRECIATION>                                            21,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         3,889,671
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  1,428,869
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                   49
<COMMON>                                                   9,168
<OTHER-SE>                                             2,446,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           3,889,671
<SALES>                                                   16,738
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          51,440
<CGS>                                                      2,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            308,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          (6,153)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        47,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (297,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (297,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (297,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              (.046)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              (.046)
        

</TABLE>
June 24, 2002




Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Dear Sir/Madam:

     The  representations  made in this letter are based  solely on  discussions
with and  representations  from the engagement partner and manager on the audits
of the  financial  statements  of ACC  Acquisition  LLC for the two most  recent
fiscal years. Those individuals are no longer with Arthur Andersen LLP.

     We have read the Item 4 included in the Report on Form 8-K,  dated June 21,
2002 of ACC  Acquisition  LLC,  to be filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  and have  found  no  basis  for  disagreement  with the  statements
contained therein.

                                Very truly yours,


                                /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Exhibit 31(c)
I, Wallace A. Patzke, Jr., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida Rock Industries,
Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; and

c.	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and

b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  August 3, 2005
                                                WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                                WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                                Vice President, Controller
                                                and Chief Accounting Officer

1
MEMORANDUM

To: e xpartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

From: Douglas Johnson

Date: June 19, 2012

Re: Docket No. EERE

– 2008

– BT

– STD

– 0005

, RIN 1904

– AB57

Ex parte communicati on

Department of Energy

M eeting of June 13, 2012

This memorandum for the record provides a summary of a June 13, 2012, meeting with U.S.

Department of Energy staff concerning DOE ’ s proposed rulemaking regarding amended energy

conservation standards for Class A external power supplies (EPSs) and new energy conservation

standards for non

- Class A E PSs and battery chargers.

Meeting attendees:

John Cymbalsky (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

Jeremy Dommu (DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

Daniel Cohen (DOE Office of General Counsel)

Michael Kito (DOE Office of General Counsel)

Douglas Johnson (Consumer Electronics Association)

Bill Chamberlain (Cobra Electronics )

Ric Erdheim (Philips Electronics )

Holly Evans ( Canon)

John Hodges ( Motorola Mobility )

Aya Kiy (Research I n Motion )

Ted Marks (JVC)

Jennifer Mulveny (HP)

Jim Morgan (Sony)

Mark Sharp (Panasonic)

Steve Whitaker ( Bose)

Rachel Wolkowitz (Microsoft)

The parties discussed the written comments submitted by the Consumer Ele ctronics Association to

the DOE on May 29, 2012, which are included in the DOE ’ s Docket No. EERE

– 2008

– BT

– STD

–

0005

, RIN 1904

– AB57

.
Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Downey Financial Corp.:

We  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration   statement
(No.333-30483) on Form S-8 of Downey Financial Corp. of our report dated January
21, 2000, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Downey Financial Corp.
as of December 31, 1999 and 1998,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
income,  comprehensive  income,  stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears
in the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Downey
Financial Corp.


                                            /s/  KPMG LLP
                                            -------------

Los Angeles, California
September 15, 2000
259 La. 813

#### COMMERCIAL CREDIT CORPORATION v. Raywood VINCENT and Helen Denlenger.

No. 51721.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: Raywood Vincent, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vermilion. 251 So.2d 63.

Writ denied. No error of law in the judgment.

SUMMERS, J.,

since the issue presented is res nova, I. am of the opinion the writ should be granted.

TATE, J., concurs in SUMMERS, J., opinion.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should he granted.
UNITED STATES

               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C. 20549

                            FORM 8-K

        Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

               The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): December 12, 2002


                       NOVO NETWORKS, INC.
     (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


            Delaware             0-28579             75-2233445
    (State of Incorporation)   (Commission          (IRS Employer
                               File Number)     Identification Number)


       2311 Cedar Springs Road, Suite 400,
                  Dallas, Texas                       75201
     (Address of Principal Executive Offices)      (Zip Code)



Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (214) 777-4100



  (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)


<PAGE>

Item 5. Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure.

        On December 12, 2002, the Registrant's Board of Directors
        appointed Russell W. Beiersdorf as a Class I Director.  Mr.
        Beiersdorf has been selected to fill the vacancy left by the
        resignation of Mark R. Graham, who stepped down as a Class I
        Director, effective November 27, 2002.   Mr. Beiersdorf will
        serve out the remainder of Mr. Graham's term, which
        continues until the 2003 Annual Meeting of the Registrant's
        stockholders.



     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly
authorized.

                                   NOVO NETWORKS, INC.


Date: December 13, 2002             /s/  BARRETT N. WISSMAN
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Name:     Barrett N. Wissman
                                   Title:    President
#### Robert Michael BROOKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1820.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 20, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie King, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment appealed is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. Appellant and his brother William Glen Brooker were jointly charged in a four-count information: count 1 charged William , with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; count 2 charged *appellant*with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; and each of counts 3 and 4 charged *both*brothers with grand larceny. At the same plea hearing both appellant and his brother pled guilty as charged to all of the charges against them and were given five-year concurrent sentences on all applicable counts. It is clear from the plea hearing transcript that the trial judge understood which counts applied to each brother, but a clerical error occurred in the entry of the written judgment and sentence, resulting in appellant’s being adjudicated guilty and sentenced on count 1, with which he was not charged. This should be corrected on remand.

In addition, the present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975). *Smith v. State,*310 So.2d 770 (Fla. 2d DCA *6981975). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper because no existing state statute provides for imprisonment at hard labor as a sentence for any offense. *Speller*v. *State,*305 So.2d 231 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Appellant need not be present at resentencing.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James JONES.

No. 54021.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1973.

In re: James Jones applying for remedial writs and/or habeas corpus.

Application denied. Letter from District Attorney shows charges have been dismissed and application is now moot.
Wit

Order entered December 12, 2012

In The 

## Court of ZtImeafg 

## ififtb Oil:aria of Texag at Oatfas:i

No. 05-12-01057-CV VICTORY PARK MOBILE HOME PARK, Appellant V. SHARON BOOHER, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-12480 

### ORDER The Court has before it the request of Diane L. Robert, official court reporter for the 14th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time in which to file the reporter's record. The Court GRANTS the request and ORDERS Ms. Robert to file the reporter's record by January 7, 2013.

MOLLY F NCIS JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, (the “Form 10-Q”) of Mackinac Financial Corporation (the “Issuer”).

 

I, Ernie R. Krueger, Executive Vice President of the Issuer, certify that:

 

(1)         The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(2)         The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Issuer.

 
| /s/   Ernie R. Krueger                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| (principal   financial officer)                        |   |
|                                                   |   |
| Date:    August 14,   2012    |   |

 

1

----