alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           88470
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1389960
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 25590
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    85
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     421738
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           37939
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             38949
<LOANS>                                        1276347
<ALLOWANCE>                                      18924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1923296
<DEPOSITS>                                     1662482
<SHORT-TERM>                                     41109
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              18109
<LONG-TERM>                                          8
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10352
<OTHER-SE>                                      191146
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1923296
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  82522
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                21826
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                104348
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               43684
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               45272
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            59076
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     2151
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 168
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  40955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  32407
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       32407
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     20753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.98
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.58
<LOANS-NON>                                       8993
<LOANS-PAST>                                      2009
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   223
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1233
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 18047
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     2353
<RECOVERIES>                                      1079
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                18924
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             18924
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          10728
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.8





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON





I, Marco Lema, state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of part(s) of the technical report summary titled "Technical Report Summary, Operation Report, Pampa Blanca"with an effective date of April 5, 2024, as signed, and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).





Furthermore, I state that:





a. I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (the “Company”) as an exhibit to Form 6-K of the Company (“Form 6-K”);





b. the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023, and any existing amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (the "Form 20-F") (the Form 6-K and Form 20-F, collectively the “Document”);





c. I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the incorporation by reference of the Technical Report Summary into Form 20-F; and





d. I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible.


By/s/ Marco LemaMarco LemaSuperintendent of Mining Resources and PlanningSQM





Dated at Santiago, Chile on April 5, 2024
#### Reverethus C. BURGESS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 9, 1973.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Bruce Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen,, Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey and Thomas Carney, Asst. Attys., Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WALDEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals a conviction for escape under Section 944.40, F.S.1969, F.S.A. He was incarcerated pursuant to a conviction for three crimes and was awaiting sentencing at the time of his escape.

The pertinent statutes in force at that time, which have since been changed, defined a prisoner as “ . . . any person convicted and sentenced by the courts . ” Defendant did not fall within the statutory definition of prisoner at the time because he had not yet been sentenced. We reverse upon authority of Van Den Bliek v. State, 281 So.2d 218, Fourth District Court of Appeal Opinion issued August 6, 1973; Brochu v. State, Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 286 and State v. Benjamin, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 348.

Reversed.

OWEN, C. J., and MAGER, J., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Shinichi Hirabayashi,certify that:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB ofExam USA, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.                                       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.

 

4.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officers andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and;

 

5.                                       The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: October 13,  2004 |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |
|                         | By:    | /s/  Shinichi Hirabayashi |
|                         |   | Shinichi Hirabayashi  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
UST Technical Compendium Category 3: Release 

Detection (RD)

http://epa.gov/oust/compend/rd.htm

Question 21: If a facility is using statistical inventory reconciliation (SIR) monthly and a report is not 

conclusive, is the owner/operator out of compliance?

Answer: Yes, an UST system relying on monthly SIR with a report that does not conclusively indicate 

whether the system is leaking at 0.2 gallons per hour with a probability of detection of 0.95 and a 

probability of false alarm of 0.05 is not technically compliance with the release detection 

requirements. A lack of conclusive results may not be possible on a small percentage of tank data 

each month, for several reasons. Because of this, EPA encourages States and Regions to use 

discretion, and to consider the efforts of owners and operators to comply in assessing whether or not 

enforcement is carried out. 

[November 18, 1993 memorandum to State and Regional Program Managers (PDF) (2 pp, 11K)] 

[February 7, 1994 letter to Mr. Hunt (PDF) (3pp, 14K)]
Exhibit 99(a)


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with The Beard  Company's (the  "Company")  Annual Report on Form
10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  William M. Beard,
Chairman  of the Board and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:  April 8, 2003                  By:   WILLIAM M. BEARD
                                            William M. Beard
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27632-27633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Importer of Controlled Substances Registration

ACTION: Notice of registration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Registrants listed below have applied for and been granted 
registration by-the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as importers 
of various classes of schedule I or II controlled substances.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The companies listed below applied to be 
registered as importers of various basic classes of controlled 
substances. Information on previously published notices is listed in 
the table below. No comments or objections were submitted and no 
requests for hearing were submitted for these notices.

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Company                  FR docket             Published
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PerkinElmer, Inc.............   83 FR 9337          March 5, 2018.
Stepan Company...............  83 FR 9337           March 5, 2018.
Noramco, Inc.................   83 FR 12408         March 21, 2018.
Sanyal Biotechnology.........  83 FR 12407          March 21, 2018.
S&B Pharma, Inc..............  83 FR 13523          March 29, 2018.
Siegfried USA, LLC...........  83 FR 13521           March 29, 2018.
Lannett Company, Inc.........  83 FR 13520          March 29, 2018.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has considered the 
factors in 21 U.S.C. 823, 952(a) and 958(a) and determined that the 
registration of the listed registrants to import the applicable basic 
classes of schedule I or II controlled substances is consistent with 
the public interest and with United States obligations under 
international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 
1971. The DEA investigated each company's maintenance of effective 
controls against diversion by inspecting and testing each company's 
physical security systems, verifying each company's compliance with 
state and local laws, and reviewing each company's background and 
history.
    Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in 
accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the DEA has granted a registration as 
an importer for schedule I or II controlled substances to the above 
listed companies.


[[Page 27633]]


    Dated: May 30, 2018.
John J. Martin,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2018-12670 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP, INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued ourreports dated March 8, 2007, accompanying the financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of SCOLR Pharma, Inc. on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of SCOLR Pharma, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-129275, File No. 333-123316, File No. 333-113949), onForm S-2 (File No. 333-107906) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-116922, File No. 333-40290, File No. 333-79343). 

/s/    GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 8, 2007
#### HUBER OIL & TIRE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Relators.

No. 3634.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third. Circuit.

Aug. 16, 1971.

Voorhies, Labbé, Fontenot, Leonard & McGlasson by J. Winston Fontenot, Lafayette, for defendants-relators.

Frank M. Brame, of Brame, Stewart & Bergstedt, Plauche, Sanders, Smith & Hebert by Allen L. Smith, Jr., Scofield & Bergstedt by John B. Scofield, Hall, Raggio & Farrar by Richard B. Cappel, Jones, Kimball, Patin, Harper, Tete & Wetherill by John A. Patin, Hunt, Godwin, Painter & Roddy by E. C. Hunt, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-respondent.

O. J. Weber, Beaumont, Tex., for respondent-plaintiff.

Raleigh Newman, McLeod & Rozas by William L. McLeod, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CUL-PEPPER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in Stanford Benoit et al. v. International Harvester Company et al., 251 So.2d 389 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1971), decided this date, the order of the trial court requiring defendant, Mack Abraham, to produce documents of his financial ability is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views herein expressed. Costs of this proceeding are assessed to Prior Products, Inc., Respondent in Opposition to Writs.

Reversed and remanded.
YES

NO

Go to FVAP.gov and fill out a Federal Post Card 

Application (FPCA) to register and request your ballot. 

You can also get one from your VAO. Send it in by 

August 1 (or your state’s deadline). 

If you haven’t received your state ballot in time 

to vote, use the Federal Write-in Absentee Ballot 

(FWAB) as a backup ballot.

Get it at FVAP.gov.

If your regular ballot arrives, 

fill that out and send it in too. 

Don’t worry; only one ballot 

will be counted.

Do you want to VOTE

in U.S. Elections?

So you’re stationed overseas and it’s 

an election year...

If you know someone 

who wants to vote, 

share this with them!

Have you registered to vote absentee 

and requested your ballot?

This handy flowchart on absentee voting 

lays it all out.

Great! Have you received 

your ballot yet?

You’re on track.

Have you filled out your 

ballot and sent it in?

Great! Have you checked 

that your ballot arrived?

Wow, you’re one

squared-away voter!

YES

NO

PRO TIP

Send it in like 

your regular ballot.

YES NO

NO

YES

After you send your ballot, 

you can check if it was received 

by your election office.

Get started at FVAP.gov.

YES

NO

Don’t miss your vote-by date! Send in 

your ballot by October 13 if you’re overseas 

or October 27 if you’re stateside. If you don’t 

have access to Military Postal Service, 

send it by October 5.
^
                               Diamond Hill
                               ------------
                               Investments


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
					 Investor Contact:
					 James F. Laird-Chief Financial Officer
					 614-255-3353 (jlaird@diamond-hill.com)

					 Media Contact:
					 Susan Stuart-Director Client Relations
					 & Communications
					 614-255-3348 (sstuart@diamond-hill.com)


DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENTS NAMES LISA WESOLEK MANAGING DIRECTOR
AND HEAD OF DISTRIBUTION


Columbus, Ohio - June 25, 2012 - Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(NASDAQ:DHIL) announced that Lisa Wesolek has joined the firm as Managing
Director and Head of Distribution.  Ms. Wesolek will be responsible for the
firm's distribution strategy including business development, sales support and
marketing.  Prior to joining Diamond Hill, she held senior roles at various
institutions including JPMorgan Asset Management and Wells Fargo Funds
Management Group.

"Our business continues to grow as investors find value in our long-term,
intrinsic value investment philosophy and process," said Ric Dillon, CEO.
"Lisa's experience in distribution and marketing will provide additional depth
and leadership to our client communications and servicing."



About Diamond Hill:
Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. is an independent investment management
firm with significant employee ownership and $9.0 billion in assets under
management as of May 31, 2012. The firm provides investment management services
to institutions and individuals through mutual funds, institutional separate
accounts, and private investment funds.  Diamond Hill's entire investment team
shares the same intrinsic value investment philosophy focused on absolute
returns, and the firm's interests are firmly aligned with its clients through
significant investment in its strategies.  For more information on Diamond
Hill, visit www.diamond-hill.com.

				  ###

            325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215
                         614-255-3333  fax 614-255-3363
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- The Healing Staff Under Contract No. FA7014-06-D-0003 APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59411

Adam M. Burton, Esq.

Counsel Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

Air Force Deputy ChiefTrial Attorney Anna F. Kurtz, Esq. Michelle D. Coleman, Esq.

Trial Attorneys ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 6 April 2017

MICHAEL T. PAUL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59411, Appeal ofThe Healing Staff, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<PAGE>


                                                          Exhibit 23.10

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                           
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (333-01574), (333-12789) and (333-24581); Form S-3 
(333-10383) and (333-14025); and on Form S-4 (333-13133) of the U.S. Office 
Products Company of our report dated March 4, 1996, with respect to the 
financial statements of Huxley Envelope Corporation for the years ended 
December 31, 1995 and 1994 (not presented separately in the Registration 
Statements), which report appears int he Annual Report on Form 10-K/A 
Amendment No. 1 of the U.S. Office Products Company for the year ended April 
26, 1997.

/s/HERTZ, HERSON & COMPANY, LLP

New York, New York
August 18, 1997
#### Robert C. GATES, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Donald J. Gates, and Donald J. Gates, individually, Petitioners, v. Irving FIEN, d/b/a Fine Potato Chip Co., and d/b/a Wise Potato Chips, and Harry E. Haytock, Respondents.

No. 38534.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 29, 1969.

Edward B. Johnson, Jr., and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for petitioners.

Paul A. Carlson, of Dixon, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., dissents.