alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Jeffrey P. Orleans, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  1. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orleans Homebuilders,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: February 13, 2003



                                                    /s/ Jeffrey P. Orleans
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Jeffrey P. Orleans
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States District

1

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

 The Honorable James J. Barta, United States Bankruptcy Judge 2

for the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-1904

___________

In re: Darius J. Whitson, Sr., *

*

Debtor. *

*

----------------- *

*

Darius J. Whitson, Sr., *

* Appeal from the United States

Appellant, * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

v. *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Transouth Financial *

Corporation, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 1, 1997

 Filed: April 9, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Darius J. Whitson appeals the district court's affirmance of the

1

bankruptcy court's grant of Transouth Financial Corporation's motion for 2

relief from an automatic stay. After careful review of the record and the

parties' briefs, we conclude the district 
-2-

court's judgment was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.

47B.

We also deny Whitson leave to move for supplemental relief.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          64,241
<SECURITIES>                                       626
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,047,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,629
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,190,513
<PP&E>                                         314,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                 170,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,983,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,381,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       346,494
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,983,780
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               734,678
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  655,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,573
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,529
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,250
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74


</TABLE>
ATTACHMENT F 

Consumer Notice 

 

Case 2:22-cv-04260 Document 2-6 Filed 07/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 244
Subject: Claim Your Refund from Harris Jewelry/CACUSA 

Because of a recent settlement with the Federal Trade Commission and a group of State Attorneys 

General,* you are eligible for a refund from Harris Jewelry. 

Records show that you paid for a Lifetime Jewelry and Watch Protection Plan. You can get a full 

refund of the amount you paid for that plan. Additionally, if you currently have an outstanding debt to 

Harris/CACUSA, you don’t have to make any more payments. Your account balance is now $0. 

Don’t wait, apply for your refund now. Visit [easily typed URL], click “Apply for a Refund,” and enter 

your name and contact information. 

Harris Jewelry will be closing down soon and is no longer accepting requests for jewelry repair, battery 

replacement, and other services covered by the Protection Plan. 

If you have questions, please call Harris Jewelry at 1-800-989-7732, Monday through Friday from 

9:00am – 5:30pm EST or email info@harrisjewelry.com. 

To learn more about the settlement, read the Federal Trade Commission’s press release [embedded link] 

or call the New York State Attorney General’s Office at (315) 523-6080. 

* The Attorneys General of the states of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, 

Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Virginia, 

Washington, and the Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection (“State Attorneys General”).

Case 2:22-cv-04260 Document 2-6 Filed 07/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 245
ex1077k123113.htm




SUMMARY OF COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS


WITH DIRECTORS AND NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS







Director Compensation.  Each director who is not an employee or officer of the Company will receive the following compensation for his services as director in 2014:


 



	
●   

	
annual base compensation of $20,000;







 



	
●  

	
$2,000 per regularly scheduled board meeting attended;







 



	
●   

	
$750 per regularly scheduled audit committee meeting attended;







 



	
●   

	
$25,000 per year for service as the Audit Committee chairman;







 



	
●   

	
$25,000 per year for service as the Compensation Committee chairman;







 



	
●   

	
$20,000 per year for service as the Nomination and Governance Committee chairman;







 



	
●   

	
$57,000 per year for service as the Technical Advisor to the Board of Directors;







 



	
●   

	
an annual grant of 4,993 shares of restricted common stock (9,985 and 17,474 shares for the chairman ofthe Nomination and Governance Committee and the Technical Advisor, respectively) and 9,985 non-qualified stock options (19,970 and 34,948 stock options for the chairman of the Nomination and Governance Committee and the Technical Advisor, respectively); and







 



	
●   

	
reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending board meetings.












Named Executive Officer Compensation.  The Company’s executive compensation program has several elements, all determined by individual and Company performance.







Base Salary Compensation







Base salaries for the Chief Executive Officer and the other named executive officers in 2014 have been established by reviewing a number of factors, including responsibilities, experience, demonstrated performance, potential for future contributions, and the level of salaries associated with similar positions at businesses that compete with the Company and other competitive factors.  Base salary levels for named executive officers in 2014, have been determined as follows:








	
David N. Pierce

	
$390,000


	
Thomas B. Lovejoy

	
262,500


	
Andrew W. Pierce

	
294,000


	
Jerzy B. Maciolek

	
294,000


	
Clay Newton

	
225,000












Other Compensation







In addition to his base salary, each of the named executive officers is eligible to participate in the following:


 



	
●  

	
the Company’s various stock option and incentive plans, under which stock options or other equity compensation may be granted from time to time as determined by the board of directors, and which may be based on factors such as the level of base pay and individual performance;







 



	
●  

	
short-term incentive compensation, which is determined from time to time by the board of directors, under which cash bonuses in varying amounts may be granted based on the Company and individual achieving predetermined goals;







 



	
●  

	
the Company’s 401(k) profit-sharing plan and other health and benefit plans generally available to Company employees; and







 



	
●  

	
other compensation arrangements as determined by the board of directors.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert J. HOFFMAN v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60315.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Robert J. Hoffman applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The allegations do not justify the relief sought.
#### L. L. CROSBY, Appellant, v. Robert J. BLACK, Appellee.

No. 72-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
DEFENSE HUMAN RESOURCES ACTIVITY

FEDERAL VOTING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
4800 MARK CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 03J25-02
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22350-4000

February 6, 2017

Commissioner Edgardo Cortes
Virginia Department of Election
1100 Bank Street, First Floor
Richmond, VA 23219

Dear Commissioner Cortes:

I am writing today with regard to the General Assembly of Virginia Senate Bill 872,
specifically the removal of the UOCAVA identification exemption that was discussed during the
Committee meeting on Tuesday, January 24, 2017. As you are aware, the Federal Voting Assistance
Program (FVAP) is the Department of Defense program charged with administering the federal
responsibilities of the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act, or UOCAVA, Our
mission is to help ensure Service members, their eligible family members and overseas citizens are
aware of their right to vote and have the tools and resources to successfully do so.

When registering to vote by mail, citizens covered by UOCAVA are exempt under 52 U.S.C.§
21083(b)(3)(C) from State requirements to provide a copy of a valid photo identification or other
documentation that shows the name and address of the voter as defined in 52 USC § 21083(b)(1)
when attempting to vote by mail. As such, our view is that Senate Bill 872’s current language that
UOCAVA voters provide identification when applying for a ballot using the Federal Post Card
Application (FPCA) may likely be in conflict with federal statute.

UOCAVA voters, particularly those stationed or residing overseas, face complexities in the
voting process that in-person or State absentee voters do not face. The original intent of the FPCA
was to allow UOCAVA voters to simultaneously register and request an absentee ballot. By swearing
to the oath on the form prescribed by FVAP, voters would meet minimum qualifications to vote in
federal elections. Requiring additional identification or proof of eligibility, in addition to the
information provided on the FPCA, adds to the burden UOCAVA voters face when attempting to vote
in federal elections. The voter would be forced to locate documents and the equipment necessary to
photocopy and submit those additional documents to their local election official, a condition difficult
to achieve depending on their geographic location and available infrastructure.

Please contact Ms. Meghan Kelly, FVAP State Affairs Specialist, at meghan.kelly@fvap.gov
with any questions, concerns or comments you may have.

Thanks for all you, your staff and colleagues in the Virginia Department of Elections do to
support and assist our military and overseas voters. We look forward to continuing to work with you.

Sincerely, /)
q,

>
/ Cals Bn pa

David Beirne
Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                              SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
                        NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
                          DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



     The Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the "Plan")
is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, as follows:


     1.   Section 2.06 (the definition of "Change in Control") is amended by
          deleting clause (vi) in its entirety and inserting a new clause (vi)
          to read as follows:

          "(vi)  any person and any of its affiliates or associates becomes the
                 beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities
                 representing forty percent (40%) or more of the combined voting
                 power of the Company's then outstanding securities having
                 general voting rights; notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change
                 in Control shall not be deemed to occur pursuant to this clause
                 (vi) solely because forty percent (40%) or more of the combined
                 voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities
                 having general voting rights is acquired by (x) the Company or
                 one or more companies the majority of whose voting common or
                 capital stock is owned directly or indirectly by the Company
                 (y) an employee benefit plan maintained by the Company or one
                 or more companies the majority of whose voting common or
                 capital stock is owned directly or indirectly by the Company or
                 (z) the trustee of the Amended and Restated Stock Employee
                 Compensation Trust, dated as of August 1, 2000, by and between
                 the Company and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as amended."
<PAGE>

     Full Force and Effect.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall
     ---------------------
continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof on the
date hereof.

     Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
     -------------
accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia applicable to
agreements made and entirely to be performed within such jurisdiction.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed this _____ day
of ________, 2001.



                                   NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.



                                   By:_______________________
                                      Vice President, Human
                                      Resources and EH&S



ATTEST:



By:_________________________
Title:
2024 Primary Elections by state and territory

This chart lists the 2024 state primary election dates in all the states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories; primary runoff dates 

(if applicable); states with U.S. Senate races; number of U.S. Representative seats up for re-election. 

The General Election is Tuesday, November 5, 2024.

State Presidential 

Primary State Primary Runoff Primary

(if necessary)

General Election

U.S. Senate U.S. Representative

Alabama March 5*** March 5*** April 16*** No 7

Alaska — August 20 — No 1

American Samoa — — — — 1 Delegate

Arizona March 19 July 30 — Yes 9

Arkansas March 5 March 5 April 2 No 4

California March 5 — — Yes 52

Colorado March 5 June 25 — No 8

Connecticut April 2 August 13 — Yes 5

Delaware April 2 September 10 — Yes 1

District of Columbia June 4 June 4 — — 1 Delegate

Florida March 19 August 20 — Yes 28

Georgia March 12 May 21 June 18 No 14

Guam August 3 August 3 — — 1 Delegate

Hawaii — August 10 — Yes 2

Idaho — May 21 — No 2

Illinois March 19 March 19 — No 17

Indiana May 7 May 7 — Yes 9

Iowa — June 4 — No 4

Kansas March 19 August 6 — No 4

Kentucky May 21 May 21 — No 6

Louisiana March 23 November 5 — No 6

Maine March 5 June 11 — Yes 2

Maryland May 14 May 14 — Yes 8

Massachusetts March 5 September 3 — Yes 9

Michigan February 27*** August 6 — Yes 13

Minnesota March 5 August 13 — Yes 8

Mississippi March 12 March 12 April 2 Yes 4

Missouri — August 6 — Yes 8

Montana June 4 June 4 — Yes 2

Nebraska May 14 May 14 — Yes 3

Nevada February 6 June 11 — Yes 4

New Hampshire January 23*** September 10 — No 2

New Jersey June 4 June 4 — Yes 12

New Mexico June 4 June 4 — Yes 3

New York April 2 June 25 — Yes 26

North Carolina March 5 March 5 May 14 No 14

North Dakota — June 11 Yes 1

Ohio March 19 March 19 — Yes 15

Oklahoma March 5 June 18 August 27 No 5

Oregon May 21 May 21 — No 6

Pennsylvania April 23*** April 23*** — Yes 17

Puerto Rico April 21** ***/

April 28* ***

June 13 — — 1 Resident

Rhode Island April 2 September 10 — Yes 2

South Carolina February 3* /

February 24**

June 11 June 25 No 7

South Dakota June 4 June 4 — No 1

Tennessee March 5 August 1 — Yes 9

Texas March 5 March 5 May 28 Yes 38

Utah March 5 June 25 — Yes 4

Vermont March 5 August 13 — Yes 1

Virgin Islands — August 3 — — 1 Delegate

Virginia March 5 June 18 — Yes 11

Washington March 12*** August 6 — Yes 10

West Virginia May 14 May 14 — Yes 2

Wisconsin April 2 August 13 — Yes 8

Wyoming — August 20 — Yes 1

* Presidential Preference Primary - Democratic ***Primary dates are subject to change

** Presidential Preference Primary - Republican

Note: Election information is current as of February 2024. Check your state election website or FVAP.gov for additional details and updates.

—
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8069 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8069

   To prohibit the Secretaries of Commerce and of the Interior from 
  issuing grants for the conservation of a species that is listed as 
   endangered under a State law that is not consistent with certain 
               Federal standards, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 18, 2020

  Mr. Cook (for himself and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the Secretaries of Commerce and of the Interior from 
  issuing grants for the conservation of a species that is listed as 
   endangered under a State law that is not consistent with certain 
               Federal standards, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Conservation Funds Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONSERVATION GRANTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior may only issue 
a grant for the conservation of a species or the habitat of a species 
that is listed as threatened or endangered under State law if--
            (1) such listing meets the requirements described for 
        listing a species in section 424.11(d) of title 50, Code of 
        Federal Regulations; or
            (2) such species is listed as threatened or endangered 
        under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
        seq.).
    (b) Certification.--The Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of 
the Interior shall require the recipient of any grant subject to 
subsection (a) to submit a certification that such recipient will not 
use funds received from such grant to conserve a species or the habitat 
of a species if such species does not meet the requirements described 
in such subsection.
    (c) Misuse of Funds.--A grant recipient that uses funds in a manner 
inconsistent with the certification described in subsection (b) shall 
be required to return funds used in such manner to the Federal 
Government.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6907

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEVE SILVER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CR-95-110-BR, CA-97-209-5-BR)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steve Silver, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant

United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motions filed under FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(a), and 28 U.S.C.A. §

2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Silver, Nos.

CR-95-110-BR; CA-97-209-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 23, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended March 31, 2004, (the Report) of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Charles K. Graham                            
|                   |  | Charles K. Graham                                
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer/Director   
|                   |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                    
|                   | 
|Date: May 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Francie P. Reppy                             
|                   |  | Francie P. Reppy                                 
|                   |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  | (Chief Financial Officer)                        



32