alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(b)
I, John D. Milton, Jr., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Florida Rock Industries,
Inc;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a.	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b.	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosures controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluations; and

c.	disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information and

b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date:  May 9, 2005
                                       JOHN D. MILTON, JR.
                                                JOHN D. MILTON, JR.
                                                Executive Vice President,
                                                Treasurer and Chief
                                                Financial Officer
1
# Official Journal C 332A/18 A

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 332A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6418 August 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 332A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6418 August 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 332 A/01 | The Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Joint Undertaking — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2021/20065 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Commission

2021/C 332 A/01

The Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) Joint Undertaking — Publication of a vacancy for the function of Executive Director (Temporary Agent — Grade AD 14) — COM/2021/20065

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             504,060
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,701,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                       171,456
<INVENTORY>                                      6,496,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,481,620
<PP&E>                                           1,198,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                     590,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,441,285
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,409,117
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            10,891
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,161,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,441,285
<SALES>                                         17,275,423
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,275,423
<CGS>                                           13,337,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,882,287
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (96,576)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 264,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    225,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                        74,724
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                150,884
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       150,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .00
        


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6899

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. EDUARDO ROMERO MARTINEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 7:18

- cr - 00012

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : November 23, 2021 Decided: November 30, 2021

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Eduardo Romero Martinez, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistan t United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eduard o Romero Martinez appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release, as well as Martinez’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction in his supervised release revocation sentence based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guideline s Manual . Upon review, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district court ’ s determination that, in light of the identified 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors , as well as the other considerations in play , compassionate release was not warranted. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329

- 31 (4th Cir. 2021 ) (providing standard of review and outlining steps for evaluating compassionate release motions), cert. denied , No. 21

- 5624, 2021 WL 4733616 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). Nor did the district court err in concluding that Mart inez could not seek a reduction in his revocation sentence based on an after

- enacted Guidelines amendment. S ee USSG § 1B1.10 cmt. n.7(A), p.s. ; see also United States v. Spruhan , 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard of review for the denial of a § 3582(c)(2) motion), cert. denied , No. 21

- 5532, 2021 WL 4733555 (U.S. Oct. 12, 2021). Accordingly, we affirm the appealed

- from order. United States v. Martinez , No. 7:1 8

- cr - 00012

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. May 25, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Tommie SIKES, Appellant, v. Katherine SIKES, Appellee.

No. 70-237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 29, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 13, 1971.

Fred A. Jones, Jr., and Martin Blitstein, Miami, for appellant.

Schwartz & Schwartz, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-defendant husband appeals final orders in a post-judgment proceeding in a divorce action. He contends that the court lacked jurisdiction for want of personal service of the rule to show cause which preceded an order finding him in indirect contempt for non-payment of child support and an order for his commitment.

We affirm the holding of the court below, after an examination of the record and contentions of the parties. The record reveals, and we so hold, that the husband, by offering evidence on the merits submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the court. See: Lawrence v. Lawrence, Fla.App.1961, 130 So.2d 639.

Affirmed.

PEARSON, C. J., dissents.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Terry D. Wall, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.

Dated: December 19, 2002


/s/ Terry D. Wall
-------------------------
Terry D. Wall
Chief Executive Officer


                                       70
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           96785
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            4868
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     760032
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        1459695
<ALLOWANCE>                                      16086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2573219
<DEPOSITS>                                     1993257
<SHORT-TERM>                                    134815
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             233870
<LONG-TERM>                                      29434
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          9739
<OTHER-SE>                                      172104
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 2573219
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 109094
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                47441
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 32280
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                188815
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               75268
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               90339
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            98476
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                4222
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 478220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (93412)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (93412)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (50521)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.24)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.74
<LOANS-NON>                                      13285
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 14699
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     3430
<RECOVERIES>                                      3217
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                16086
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             16086
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          16086
        

</TABLE>
Attachment 1a



### I NCOMPLETE 

### F ORMS 

### M AY 

### N OT 

### B E 

### P ROCESSED Information collection via this form is authorized by OMB Control No. 2060 - 0439 

# Registration Form for EPA’s SunWise Program Your Name: _____________________________________________________________________ How did you learn about SunWise? ___________________________________________________

____________________________________________ ____________________________________ 

## About Your School Please select your position at school: Teacher Nurse Counselor PTA member Principal/Administrator School District Employ ee Student Teacher Substitute Teacher Other:_______________________ School Name: ___________________________________________________________________ School Address: _

_________________________________________________________________ City : ___________________________________ State:__________ Zip Code: ________________ Phone: (_______)__________________________ County : ________________________________ Your E - mail : ______

______________________________________________________________ School Web site: __________________________________________________________________ Is your school: Public Non - charter Private Charter Grade(s) you teach: Pre - K K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 - 12 Subjects y ou teach: Science Social Studies Math English ESL Health School Nurse Phy s ical Education Env. Studies Other:_____________________ Estimated number of total students in your school: ______________________________________ Number of students you plan to teach SunWise in a y ear: ____________

_____________________ How do y ou plan to use the kit (i.e., on testing day s as a fun break for students, during our solar unit, or at the beginning of outdoor activities, during rainy day P.E. activities, etc.)? _________________

__________________________ ______________________________________________________ Language : English Materials OR Spanish Materials? Inkeeping with the EPA's commitment to program evaluation, are you willing to be contacted periodically

regardin g SunWise? Yes No
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. James C. RENDICH, Appellant, v. The MUNICIPAL COURT, CITY OF HOLLYWOOD, Florida, and Nickolas De Tardo, Judge of said Court, Appellees.

No. 72-208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 8, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Binding Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 9, 2005, (the "Report"), I, DonCivgin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<PAGE>
25
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

             Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
<PAGE>
26
 
Computation of Earnings Per Share
---------------------------------

The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share,
Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 1998
and 1997, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.

Earnings Per Share

Net Income/ 
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period

                                  Three months ended
                                       March 31,
                                  1998            1997
                               ----------      ----------
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding              1,209,085      1,209,085
 
Net Income                        519,740        476,607
 
Per Share Amount                      .43            .39

No common stock equivalents exist.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________

)

ZHI CHEN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 08-0252 (PLF)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion issued this same day, it is

hereby

ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process pursuant

to Rule 12(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by defendants the District of Columbia

and Chancham Spears [2] is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s claims against the District of Columbia

and Chancham Spears are DISMISSED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

/s/________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: March 25, 2009
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 720

To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South Dakota portion

of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer National Forest, and for other

purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 2, 1993

Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the adjustment of the boundaries of the South

Dakota portion of the Sioux Ranger District of Custer

National Forest, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SIOUX RANGER DISTRICT BOUNDARY ADJUST4 MENT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the Act enti6 tled ‘‘An Act to consolidate national forest lands’’, ap7 proved March 20, 1922 (16 U.S.C. 485 et seq.), and in

8 exchange for national forest lands in Custer National For9 est, the Secretary of Agriculture may accept title to any
2

HR 720 IH

1 lands located within five miles of the exterior boundaries

2 of the South Dakota portion of the Sioux Ranger District

3 of Custer National Forest that are not owned by the

4 United States and that are found by the Secretary of Agri5 culture to be chiefly valuable for national forest purposes.

6 (b) INCORPORATION INTO CUSTER NATIONAL FOR7 EST.—Upon acceptance of title by the Secretary of Agri8 culture, lands conveyed to the United States in accordance

9 with subsection (a) shall become part of the Custer

10 National Forest.

Æ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v.

JAMES W. WITT,

Respondent

- Appellant. No. 15

- 16721

D.C. No. 1:15

- cv

- 00418

- LJO

- SAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’ Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017 **

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

James W. Witt appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting the

Internal Revenue Service’s (“IRS”) petition to enforce a summons. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for clear error the district court’s

summons

- enforcement decision. United States v. Richey , 632 F.3d 559, 563 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 16721

Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court did not clearly err by granting the petition because the

United States met its burden of establishing its prima facie case for enforcement of

the IRS summons, and Wi t t failed to rebut that showing. See United States v.

Powell , 379 U.S. 48, 57

- 58 (1964) (setting forth requirements for establishing a

prima facie case for enforcement, and explaining that the burden is on the taxpayer

to show an abuse of the process); Un ited States v. Dynavac, Inc. , 6 F.3d 1407,

1414 (9th Cir. 1993) (o nce a prima facie case is made a heavy burden is placed on

the taxpayer to show an abuse of process or the la ck of institutional good faith ).

W e reject as without merit W itt’s contention s th at the district court was

bias ed and violated his due process rights.

Witt’s motion filed on April 21, 2016

, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Seymour FERINA, Appellant.

No. 59896.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 1977.

*1201Robert F. DeJean, Sr., DeJean & DeJean, Opelousas, Louis B. Merhige, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Morgan J. Gou-deau, Jr., Dist. Atty., Patrick G. Quinlan, J. Wensles Parra, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for plaintiff-appellee.

TATE, Justice.

By joint stipulation, it has been brought to our attention that the appellant died while this appeal was pending. The prosecution in these proceedings is therefore abated. *State v. Morris,*328 So.2d 65 (La.1976).

Accordingly, the appeal in this case is dismissed, the judgment of conviction is vacated, and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

PROSECUTION ABATED, APPEAL DISMISSED.