alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anthony James LITTLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-626.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 20, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; James M. Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
SAILORS

Do you want to vote absentee?
Here’s how to get started.

CONTACT YOUR
VOTING ASSISTANCE OFFICER

©) FVAPsov
Ex 10.4 2014.02.25






Exhibit 10.4	
							
	Annex 1 (original version) to the Corporate Guarantee dated 01/       /2014 in the amount of EUR 20 mn.

	in connection with the Credit Facility Agreement with an amount of EUR 20,000,000.-- dated 06/18/2012 and the 1. Amendment of the Credit Facility Agreement dated 01/17/2014

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	The following branches and subsidiaries of Deutsche Bank AG ("Lending Offices") have entered into business relationship 
	 
	 
	 

	with the affiliated companies of IPG Laser GmbH.
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	In this context the following facilities of the Credit Facility Agreement with an amount of EUR 20,000,000.-- dated 06/18/2012 and the 1. Amendment of the Credit Facility Agreement dated 01/17/2014 have been allocated 

	inter alia for the use of the companies listed hereafter:
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Summary of credit agreements for the IPG Laser GmbH group of companies in Germany and abroad:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Debtor
	Lending Office
	local currency
	amount (in currency)
	Facility 1
Cash
	Facility 2
Guarantee 
	total

	 
	 
	if not in EURO convert to EURO
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	IPG Laser GmbH
	Deutsche Bank AG, Cologne, Germany
	 
	 
	1,000,000 €
	2,500,000 €
	3,500,000 €

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Credit lines under guarantee of IPG Laser GmbH
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	IPG Photonics (Italy) S.r.l., Via Kennedy 21, 20023 Cerro Maggiore (Milano), Italy
	Deutsche Bank Spa, Milano, Italy
	 
	 
	1,500,000 €
	0 €
	1,500,000 €

	IRE-Polus NTO, 141190, Fryazino, pl. Vvedenskogo, Russia
	Deutsche Bank Ltd., Moscow, Russia
	 
	 
	0 €
	15,000,000 €
	15,000,000 €

	Total credit lines based on the guarantee  
	 
	 
	 
	2,500,000 €
	17,500,000 €
	20,000,000 €

	Burbach, Germany 20 January 2014
	 
	Cologne, 6 January 2014
	 

	Place and date
	 
	Place and date
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	IPG Laser GmbH
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Eugene Scherbakov
	 
	/s/ Eddy Henning   /s/ Joachim Gartz


	 

	(corporate seal and  binding signatures of the Guarantor)
	(Deutsche Bank AG Filiale Deutschlandgeschäft)
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Being guarantor we agree with above mentioned changes of the facilities within the Credit Facility Agreement dated June 18th, 2012 between IPG Laser GmbH and the Bank regarding the Umbrella Facility in the amount of EUR 20 million. Further we agree with all future chanages within the Umbrella Facility and waive separate information thereof, provided that the allocation to subsidiaries of IPG Laser GmbH does not exceed an aggregate amount of EUR 20 million (cash/discount and for guarantees).

	Oxford, MA USA February 25, 2014
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	IPG Photonics Corporation
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Timothy PV Mammen
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 







1
#### Larry SMITH v. Thomas D. COOK, Supt., Miss. State Penitentiary.

Misc. No. 173.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 12, 1971.

Larry Smith, pro se.

A. F. Summer, Atty, Gen., by Velia Ann Mayer, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

RODGERS, Justice:

An examination of a letter in the form of a petition for habeas corpus filed by Larry Smith reveals that the petitioner pled guilty to a criminal charge in Sharkey County, Mississippi, and is now being held in the State Penitentiary at Parchman, Sunflower County, Mississippi.

The answer of the Attorney General reveals that no petition for habeas corpus has been filed in either Sunflower or Shar-key County.

Section 2819 Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated (Supp.1970) requires that a prisoner in the State Penitentiary must file a petition for habeas corpus, when so desired, in the county where he was convicted. Moreover, the petition is not verified by oath as is required by the foregoing Code section.

The petitioner’s petition is, therefore, dismissed without prejudice.

All Justices concur.
#### Woodrow Franklin GOAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          35,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,114
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,649,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                 294,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,854,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        875,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,072
<OTHER-SE>                                     589,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,854,877
<SALES>                                        357,581
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               565,664
<CGS>                                          267,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  405,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,910
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,690
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             70,220
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 26,652
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    96,872
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.89


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                               2,048
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      226,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4,873
<INVENTORY>                                         24,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   255,340
<PP&E>                                           3,573,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,996,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,890,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              383,513
<BONDS>                                            454,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            16,250
<OTHER-SE>                                         796,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,890,361
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   938,131
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      544,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  32,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    223,897
<INCOME-TAX>                                        85,252
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                138,645
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       138,645
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1










May 18, 2011

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Megan Lewis918-561-5325
  ONEOK Partners to Participate in National Association of
 Publicly Traded Partnerships Investor Conference
 
 TULSA, Okla. –May 18, 2011 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will present at the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships Investor Conference on Thursday, May 26, 2011, in Greenwich, Conn.
 
 Terry Spencer, ONEOK Partners chief operating officer, will present at the conference at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).
 
 The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on ONEOK Partners’ website www.oneokpartners.com.  A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days after the conference.
 
 The company will also post the presentation on its website that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).


ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
 
 For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com.
 
 For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners.
 
 ###
#### Carlos Junior HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43533.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 27, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 273 So.2d 130.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert H. MURRAY v. C. Paul PHELPS, Director, Ross Maggio, Warden.

No. 60223.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Robert H. Murray applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ denied. All assignments alleged are reviewable on appeal, and an appeal has been taken.
Exhibit 31(2)



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, George M. Bachman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2004

By  /s/ George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350 Certification ofChief Executive Officer**

**Furnished Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Versant Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, LEE MCGRATH, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company for the annual period covered by the Report.

 

 
| /s/ Lee McGrath                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------|
| Lee McGrath  Chief Financial Officer  February 14, 2005 |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 hasbeen provided to Versant Corporation and will be retained by VersantCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)October 28, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)October 27, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn October 27, 2014, ONEOK Partners, L.P. announced plans to acquire an 80 percent interest in the West Texas LPG Pipeline Limited Partnership and 100 percent interest in the Mesquite Pipeline for approximately $800 million, subject to customary post-closing adjustments.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated October 27, 2014.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:October 28, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer


3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated October 27, 2014.








4
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 November 1, 2005

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of October 31, 2005, preliminary assets under management totaled
totaled $1.194 billion.  Following is a summary of assets under management as of
October 31, 2005 (in millions):

				Equity	  Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts	$343.2	      $137.8      $  481.0
Mutual Funds			 544.3	        74.2         618.5
Private Investment Partnership    94.8           0.0          94.8
                                ------        ------      --------
Total				 982.3	       212.0       1,194.3


Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small Cap		      $  263.0
Large Cap			 179.1
All Cap				 171.4
Long/Short			 346.5
Bank & Financial		  19.5
Strategic Income		 149.9
Other Fixed Income		  59.4
Other				   5.5
				------
Total			       1,194.3


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: November 1, 2005	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 821 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 821

 To require records of the national instant criminal background check 
              system to be retained for at least 90 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2019

  Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require records of the national instant criminal background check 
              system to be retained for at least 90 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``NICS Review Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT NICS RECORDS BE RETAINED FOR AT LEAST 90 DAYS.

    Section 511 of division B of the Consolidated and Further 
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (34 U.S.C. 40901 note; Public Law 
112-55; 125 Stat. 632) is amended by striking ``no more than 24 hours'' 
and inserting ``no fewer than 90 days''.
                                 <all>
```
#### LOFTIES KNITTING MILLS, INC., a New York corporation, Appellant, v. KELWIN OF MIAMI, INC., a Florida corporation, Milton Mirsky, Mal Malvin and Claire Mirsky, Appellees.

No. 69-1066.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.