alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William J. GUSTE, Jr., Attorney General and Charles W. Tapp, Director, Governor’s Consumer Protection Division, in their Official Capacity and on Behalf of Barry Simon and all Louisiana Consumers similarly situated. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION.

No. 61840.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: General Motors Corporation, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 354 So.2d 770.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.




                                        LASER  MASTER  INTERNATIONAL,   INC.

                                        -------------------------------------
                                                   (Registrant)     

     4/12/99                            /s/  MENDEL KLEIN
--------------------------------        -------------------------------------
     Date                               MENDEL KLEIN, PRESIDENT



     4/12/99                            /s/  LEAH KLEIN
--------------------------------        -------------------------------------
     Date                               LEAH KLEIN,  VICE PRESIDENT/SEC'Y
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700168

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

EDDIE F. ACUNA

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew J. Kent, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 1st Tank Battalion, 1st 

Marine Division (REIN), FMF, MCAGCC, Twentynine Palms, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel 

Matthew J. Stewart, USMC.

For Appellant: Major David A. Peters, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 26 October 2017

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, SAYEGH, and RUSSELL, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.26



Description of Compensatory Arrangement

with Mr. Marcus
G. Smith



In connection with his appointment as Executive Vice
President of National Sales and Marketing of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (the Company) in February 2004, Mr. Marcus G. Smiths compensation was clarified to reflect the responsibilities and obligations of his new position. Consistent
with Company policy, Mr. Smith does not have an employment contract. His compensation for fiscal year 2004 includes an annual base salary of $120,000 and sales commissions based on gross sales, at the following rates:



|                           |  |     |  
|-------------------------- |  | --- | -
|Performance Racing Network |  | 7.0 | %
|Gross Sales of:            |  |     |  
|$0 to $10 million          |  | 1.5 | %
|$10 million to $12 million |  | 2.5 | %
|$12 million to $14 million |  | 3.5 | %



The commissions outlined above
are consistent with Mr. Smiths position and the sales commission and bonus program of the Company. It is anticipated that in future years, Mr. Smiths annual compensation will continue to be determined by the Companys Compensation
Committee in accordance with its policies regarding executive officers and any commission bonuses will continue to be consistent with the Companys overall sales commission and bonus program.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our
report dated October 31, 1997 relating to the financial statements of Universal
Express, Inc. (Formerly known as Packaging Plus Services, Inc.) as of June 30,
1997 and for the year then ended.


                                           
                                           /s/ Feldman Sherb Ehrlich & Co., P.C.
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Feldman Sherb Ehrlich & Co., P.C.
                                           Certified Public Accountants
                                           (Formerly Feldman Radin * Co., P.C.)
New York, New York
September 16, 1998
EXHIBIT 11.1

Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

Computation of Earnings Per Share

The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.

Earnings Per Share

Net Income / Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period



|                                    |  |                             |           |      |   |          
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                    |  | Three months ended June 30,
|                                    |  | 2008                        |           | 2007
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                             | 1,528,443 |      |   | 1,528,443
|Net Income                          |  | $                           | 511,217   |      | $ | 506,022  
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                           | 0.33      |      | $ | 0.33     



|                                    |  |                           |           |      |   |          
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                    |  | Six months ended June 30,
|                                    |  | 2008                      |           | 2007
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                           | 1,528,443 |      |   | 1,528,443
|Net Income                          |  | $                         | 1,147,558 |      | $ | 921,418  
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                         | 0.75      |      | $ | 0.60     

No common stock equivalents exist.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-K.  
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                         0000935802
<NAME>                                       ANICOM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       dollars
       
<S>                           <C>                       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-mos                    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998  
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998   
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.000     
<CASH>                                             2,589     
<SECURITIES>                                           0     
<RECEIVABLES>                                    110,183     
<ALLOWANCES>                                       4,140     
<INVENTORY>                                       87,250     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 213,331     
<PP&E>                                            13,566     
<DEPRECIATION>                                     3,603   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   353,221     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            166,851     
<BONDS>                                                0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             20,000   
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              17     
<OTHER-SE>                                       166,353  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     353,221     
<SALES>                                          470,279     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 470,279     
<CGS>                                            365,613     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    365,613     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  88,671     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,853   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   13,142     
<INCOME-TAX>                                       5,600     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                7,542     
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       7,542 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .30 
                                                        
                                                         


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.3

                       SUPPLEMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

         SUPPLEMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT made as of June 1, 2001, to
Consulting Agreement made as of October 1, 2000, by and between Madison Venture
Capital II, Inc., a New York corporation with offices at 150 East 58th Street -
24th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant")
and BBIS.com, Inc., Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at c/o Port
Motors, 1036 Northern Boulevard, Roslyn, New York 11576 (hereinafter referred to
as the "Company").

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant have entered into a consulting
agreement, dated as of as of October 1, 2000 (the "Consulting Agreement"; and

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant desire to amend and supplement
the Consulting Agreement;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
herein contained and the acts herein described, it is agreed between the parties
as follows:

                  1.       All defined terms not defined herein shall have the
meaning given them in the Consulting Agreement.

                  2.       The five (5) year term of the Consulting Agreement
shall commence on October 1, 2001 and ending September 30, 2006 and no
consulting fees under Section 3(i) shall be due, payable or accrue before
October 1, 2001.

                  3.       All of the other terms and conditions of the
Consulting Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be
signed and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed the day and year first
above written.

                                     Madison Venture Capital II, Inc.



                                     By: /s/ DR. EUGENE STRICKER
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Dr. Eugene Stricker, President


                                     BBIS.com, Inc.



                                     By: /s/ BRUCE BARON
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Bruce Baron, President
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



Date:    February 9, 2006

                                                   Michael T. Vesey
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Michael T. Vesey
                                                   President and Chief Operating
                                                   Officer
##### 



Exhibit 24.14 Power of Attorney KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Concetta M. Ruggiero, a member of the
Board of Directors of ML Life Insurance Company of New York (the Company ),
whose signature appears below, constitutes and appoints Barry G. Skolnick and
Edward W. Diffin, Jr., respectively, and each of them, her true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for her and in her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign
any and all Registration Statements and Amendments thereto, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith,
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, where applicable, and the Securities
Act of 1933, respectively, with the Securities Exchange Commission, for the
purpose of registering any and all variable life and variable annuity separate
accounts (collectively Separate Accounts), of the Company that may be
established in connection with the issuance of any and all variable life and
variable annuity contracts funded by such Separate Accounts, granting unto said
attorney-in-fact and agent, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done. Effective Date: April 17, 2003 /s/ Concetta M. RuggieroConcetta M. Ruggiero
  State of New Jersey
County of Mercer On the 4th day of April, 2003, before me came Concetta M. Ruggiero
Director of ML Life Insurance Company of New York, to me known to be said
person and he signed the above Power of Attorney on behalf of ML Life Insurance
Company of New York. /s/ Ruth A. WallNotary Public
 [SEAL] **Ruth A. Wall**Notary Public
              State of New Jersey
              My Commission Expires
                 April 25, 2006
#### Edward STANLEY and Katherine R. Stanley, his wife, Appellants, v. PERINI LAND AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-617.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 10664.

#### O’Connell, Admx., v. Hazen et al., Partners, et al.

Decided June 16, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Shay, Cogan &*Williams, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Cohen & Mack*and *Mr. Louis A. Ireton,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT C

CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 114

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:114
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 115

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:115
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 116

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:116
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 117

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 4 of 9 Page ID #:117
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 118

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 5 of 9 Page ID #:118
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 119

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 6 of 9 Page ID #:119
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 120

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 7 of 9 Page ID #:120
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 121

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 8 of 9 Page ID #:121
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 122

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 1-3 Filed 11/20/23 Page 9 of 9 Page ID #:122
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment Trust of
New Jersey (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2008
(the “Report”), I, Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),
      and,




(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:  June
      9, 2008
            /s/ Robert S.
      HekemianRobert
      S. HekemianChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer






Page
26
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Jerome E. Ball, Chief Executive Officer of ForwardIndustries, Inc. ("Forward"), and Douglas W. Sabra, Chief Financial Officer ofForward, do each certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that, to the best of theirknowledge:

1.          Forward'squarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2005 (the"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.          the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Forward.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 25th day of July 2005. 

/s/ JEROME E. BALLJerome E. BallChief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer

/s/ DOUGLAS W. SABRADouglas W. SabraChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Contact Lens Price Comparison

2004

Channel Focus Toric FreshLook 

Colorblends

Acuvue 2

Mass Merchandisers $53.21 $35.40 $18.05

Optical Retail Chains $66.69 $42.09 $22.85

Independent 

Optometrists

$70.91 $46.67 $24.39

Ophthalmologists $73.18 $46.54 $25.74

Average of ECPs $67.87 $44.43 $23.31

1-800 CONTACTS $59.00 $34.95 $19.95

Source: 1-800 Contacts, Comment #1, at 17-1 8 and Attach. 23, as reprinted in 

FTC Report “The Strength of Competition in the Sale of Rx Contact Lenses: An FTC Study, February, 2005.
Product 2004 (found in 

FTC Study)

2004 price in 2012 

constant dollars 

(1)

Current Pricing

Acuvue 2 (6pk) $19.95 $24.83 $18.99/ea.

for annual supply

or $20.99/ea

Focus Toric2 $59.00 $73.43 $49.99/ea 

for annual supply

or $57.49/ea 

FreshLook Colorblends

(6pk)

$34.95 $43.50 $39.49/ea

for annual supply

or $46.99/ea

1 Based on annual CPI increases for medical care commodities.

2 Current comparable product is “Air Optix for Astigmatism”
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charlie WILLIAMS v. Harold M. TERRY, Sheriff of Caddo Parish.

No. 60598.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 11, 1977.

In re: Charlie Williams applying for remedial writs and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ granted. Trial court is ordered to supply applicant with copy of pertinent forms, as per Rule 22, Sec. 2 Rules of Louisiana Supreme Court.
KMC Wheel - Offset Calculations

Form ThroughputUnitsEFAER 02/03 ThroughputUnits EF AER 01/02 PM emissions B4 2794tons 4.3 12014.2 4983tons 1.9 9467.7 PM emissions B1 60.35mmcf 7.5 452.63 59.83mmcf 7.5 448.73 SOx emissions B1 60.35mmcf0.83 50.09 59.83mmcf 0.83 49.66 Notes: B1 is for NG usage. PM for non-combustion has been mulitpled by 50% to account for PM10 emissions. AER 01/02 throughput reduced from 7900 to 4983, based on monthly throughput limit.
App 400236, Melting Furnace Througput Fraction 0.374 0.374 NG Rating Fraction 0.232 0.232 PM10 (Throughput fractionX AER B4) 4491.76 3539.70 PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 105.06 104.15 PM10 Total (melting + combustion) 4596.82 3643.85 SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 11.63 11.53
App 400235, Melting Furnace AER 01/02 data not used Througput Fraction 0.626 0.626 NG Rating Fraction 0.435 0.435 PM10 (Throughput fractionX AER B4) 7522.44 5928.00 PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 196.99 195.29 PM10 Total (melting + combustion) 7719.42 6123.29 SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 21.80 21.61

App 302844, Heat Treating Furnace NG Rating Fraction 0.145 0.145 PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 65.66 65.10 SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 7.27 7.20

App 302846, Heat Treating Furnace AER 01/02 data not used NG Rating Fraction 0.145 0.145 PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 65.66 65.10 SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 7.27 7.20
App 348664. Baking Oven, Paint AER 01/02 data not used NG Rating Fraction 0.043 0.043 PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 19.26 19.09 SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 2.13 2.11

Total PM 12,466.83 9,916.43 Average PM 11,191.63 Total SOx 50.09 49.66 Average SOx 49.88

Application No. Equipment NG rating mmbtu/hr NG Rating Fraction Throughput Limit lb/month Throughput Fraction 400236 Al melting furance 4.8 0.232 310,500 0.374 400235 Al melting furance 9 0.435 520,000 0.626 302844 Heat treating furance 3 0.145 N/A N/A 302846 Heat treating furance 3 0.145 N/A N/A 348664 Baking oven, paint 0.88 0.043 N/A N/A Total 20.68 1 830,500 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                  July 2, 2003

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Frank's Nursery
Crafts, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended May 18, 2003 (the "Report"),
as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
undersigned, Bruce Dale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of such officer's knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the date first above written.


                                       /s/ Bruce Dale
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Bruce Dale
                                       Chief Executive Officer