alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,746
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,106
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,307
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     39,405
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,426
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,487
<LOANS>                                         97,322
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,948
<DEPOSITS>                                     140,871
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,541
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,141
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,045
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 161,948
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,178
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  723
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   116
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,017
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,225
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,277
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,740
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       46
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    774
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         774
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       520
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.87
<LOANS-NON>                                        423
<LOANS-PAST>                                       272
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,218
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       68
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,201
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,201
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             31
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8117 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8117

To hold individuals convicted of Federal offenses during the course of 
 protests financially liable for the cost of Federal policing, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 28, 2020

  Mr. Banks introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways 
 and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To hold individuals convicted of Federal offenses during the course of 
 protests financially liable for the cost of Federal policing, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support Peaceful Protest Act''.

SEC. 2. ORDER OF RESTITUTION.

    In the case of an individual convicted of a Federal offense related 
to the individual's conduct at and during the course of a protest with 
respect to which a Federal law enforcement officer was engaged in 
policing activity, the court shall, in addition to the penalty for such 
conviction, order the individual to pay an order of restitution to the 
appropriate Federal law enforcement agency in an amount that is equal 
to the cost of such policing activity, as determined by the court.

SEC. 3. INELIGIBILITY FOR ENHANCED FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS.

    An individual convicted of a Federal offense related to the 
individual's conduct at and during the course of a protest, is 
ineligible for any Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation under 
section 2104 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9023) or any other Federal 
supplemental unemployment compensation during the COVID-19 public 
health emergency (as such term is defined in section 2102 of the CARES 
Act (15 U.S.C. 9021).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.8

                              THIRD AMENDMENT TO
                        NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.
                      RETIREMENT BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN



     The Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. Retirement Benefit Restoration Plan (the
"Plan") is hereby amended, effective as of the date hereof, as follows:


     1.   Section 2.7 (the definition of "Change in Control") is amended by
          deleting clause (vi) thereof in its entirety and inserting a new
          clause (vi) to read as follows:

          "(vi)  any person and any of its affiliates or associates becomes the
                 beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of securities
                 representing forty percent (40%) or more of the combined voting
                 power of the Company's then outstanding securities having
                 general voting rights; notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change
                 in Control shall not be deemed to occur pursuant to this clause
                 (vi) solely because forty percent (40%) or more of the combined
                 voting power of the Company's then outstanding securities
                 having general voting rights is acquired by (x) the Company or
                 one or more companies the majority of whose voting common or
                 capital stock is owned directly or indirectly by the Company
                 (y) an employee benefit plan maintained by the Company or one
                 or more companies the majority of whose voting common or
                 capital stock is owned directly or indirectly by the Company or
                 (z) the trustee of the Amended and Restated Stock Employee
                 Compensation Trust, dated as of August 1, 2000, by and between
                 the Company and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as amended."
<PAGE>

     Full Force and Effect.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall
     ---------------------
continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof on the
date hereof.

     Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in
     -------------
accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia applicable to
agreements made and entirely to be performed within such jurisdiction.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed this _____ day
of _______, 2001.


                                   NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING INC.



                                   By:_______________________
                                      Vice President, Human
                                      Resources and EH&S



ATTEST:



By:_________________________
Title:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPANY

(Section 302)

I, George M. Bachman, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Florida Public Utilities Company (the registrant);

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 11, 2006

By  /s/ George M. Bachman

George M. Bachman

Chief Financial Officer
#### Mary Cobb SIMON, Plaintiff-Appellant-Appellee, v. J. Minos SIMON, Defendant-Appellee-Appellant.

No. 3390.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 17, 1971.

Tucker & Schonekas, by Russell J. Schon-ekas, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant-appellee.

John Rixie Mouton, Offices of J. Minos Simon, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee-appellant.

Before SAVOY, HOOD and MILLER, JJ-

MILLER, Judge.

Both parties have alleged or admitted that both appeals are moot and have moved for dismissal of the appeals. In accordance with Rule VII, Section 3 of the Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal, (LSA-R.S. volume 8, page 391), both appeals are dismissed. Costs of this appeal are assessed one-half to each party.

Appeals dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4427

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TONY JAMES BENNETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CR-04-158)

Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: February 15, 2006

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller,

Acting United States Attorney, Steven I. Loew, Assistant United

States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tony James Bennett appeals his thirty-month sentence

imposed after he pled guilty to possession of a firearm by a

convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). He contends on

appeal that his sentence is unreasonable in light of United States

v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). We affirm.

Bennett maintains that his sentence is unreasonable

because his possession, while illegal, was harmless to the public.

Although the sentencing guidelines are no longer mandatory, Booker

makes clear that a sentencing court “must consult [the] Guidelines

and take them into account when sentencing.” 125 S. Ct. at 767

(Breyer, J., opinion of the Court). The court should consider the

sentencing range along with the other factors identified in 18

U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005), and then impose a

sentence. See United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 546 (4th Cir.

2005). The sentence must be “within the statutorily prescribed

range and . . . reasonable.” Id. at 546-47 (citations omitted). 

In sentencing Bennett, the district court considered the

properly calculated guideline range and the factors in § 3553(a).

Because the court sentenced Bennett within the advisory guideline

range and within the ten-year statutory maximum, see 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(a)(2), we conclude that Bennett’s sentence is reasonable.

Accordingly, we affirm the sentence. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
- 3 -

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 12(a)

			 FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
		COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
								Six Months
								  Ended
								 June 30,              Years Ended December 31,
								   1999        1998     1997     1996     1995     1994
								----------    ------   ------   ------   ------   ------
											(Millions of Dollars)
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ............................................        $  286       $  664   $  618   $  579   $  553   $  519
  Income taxes ..........................................           134          279      304      294      329      307
  Fixed charges, included in the determination of
    net income, as below ................................           112          335      304      283      308      337
  Distributed income of independent power investments....            31           68       47       38       39       28
  Less: Equity in earnings of independent power
    investments .........................................            24           39       14        5        6       (3)
      Total earnings, as defined ........................        $  539       $1,307   $1,259   $1,189   $1,223   $1,194

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ......................................        $  106       $  322   $  291   $  267   $  291   $  319
  Rental interest factor ................................             2            4        4        5        6        7
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost ...........             4            9        9       11       11       11
  Fixed charges, included in the determination of net
    income ..............................................           112          335      304      283      308      337
  Capitalized interest ..................................             1            2        4        -        -        -

      Total fixed charges, as defined ...................        $  113       $  337   $  308   $  283   $  308   $  337

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ......................          4.77         3.88     4.09     4.20     3.97     3.54
</TABLE>
#### Michael Joseph OSMAN, Appellant, v. Barbara Joyce OSMAN, Appellee.

No. 70-888.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

Carr & Warren, Miami, for appellant.

Milton Ferrell, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Bordman v. Bordman, Fla.App. 1970, 231 So.2d 543.
SERVED: JULY 31, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTERS OF 

REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0851 

AND 

REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BEASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0852 

HEARING NOTICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on October 1, 2, and 3, 2014, in Courtroom TBA, U.S. District Court, Northern District 

of Illinois, Everett McKinley Dirksen Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 1 Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each 

day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. 

Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper 

pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

1 The parties should confirm the courtroom with Larry Collins, Administrative Assistant to the Chief Judge, 

Room· 2530A [312-435-5603; FAX 312-408-5088], prior to or on the day of hearing. 

1 

.... 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

Reza Soltanian, Respondent's President 

Regent Aerospace Corporation and Airbase Services, Inc. 

28110 West Harrison Parkway 

Valencia, CA 913 5 5-41 09 

TEL: 661-257-3000 

FAX: 661-702-0241 

JohnS. Hoff 

Jeffrey Clement, Respondent's Counsel 

Hoff Law Group 

135 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3300 

Chicago, IL 60603-4134 

TEL: 312-346-8111 

FAX: 312-853-3924 

Chris G. Zurales, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel, Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7713 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-3 66-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

2 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0851 & 

FAA-20 13-0852 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

· DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### William GABRICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.

***Final Site*** March 2012 

COMPASS PLAZA WELL TCE Rogersville, Missouri

Greene County

 Site Location:

The Compass Plaza Well TCE site is located on the western edge of the city of Rogersville, Missouri. 

 Site History:

The Compass Plaza Well TCE site consists of contaminated ground water that has contaminated domestic and irrigation 

wells. The site includes a small cluster of wells in Greene County near Compass Plaza, a commercial area of Rogersville. 

Following public drinking water monitoring by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), trichloroethene 

(TCE) was detected in the Compass Plaza strip mall drinking water well and at two nearby public wells. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

The contaminant of concern is TCE in the soil and ground water. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

There are three municipal wells within four miles of the site. Rogersville City Well #2 is only used for monitoring 

purposes. The Census of Missouri Public Water Systems lists the population served by the City of Rogersville’s two public 

wells as 1,500 people. The two wells used for production (Wells #1 and #4) are located between 1-2 miles of the site. 

Additionally, there are 13 community and non-community wells and 557 private wells within four miles of the site. 

 Response Activities (to date):

Of the 557 private wells within a four mile radius, approximately 235 have been sampled. TCE was detected in the 

Compass Plaza strip mall drinking water well and in 13 private drinking water wells. Of these 13 private drinking water 

wells, six have shown TCE levels above EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). The EPA 

has provided water treatment systems to those residents whose private wells are contaminated with TCE above the MCL. 

The EPA, in cooperation with MDNR, the Greene County Resource Management and the Natural Resource Conservation 

Service, capped a well with high concentrations of TCE to protect ground water resources. These same agencies also 

oversaw the construction of a new drinking water well. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The State of Missouri referred the site to the EPA. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but they are 

not viable at this time. The EPA received a letter from the state supporting the listing of the site to the NPL.