alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



|1. | Mental Health Outcomes, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------



|2. | Horizon Mental Health Management, Inc., a Texas corporation, d/b/a Horizon Health Behavioral Health Services
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | HHMC Partners, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | -------------------------------------------



|4. | Horizon Health Physical Rehabilitation Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Employee Assistance Services, Inc., a Kentucky corporation
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------



|6. | Horizon Behavioral Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation, d/b/a Horizon Health EAP Services
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|7. | HMHM of Tennessee, Inc., a Tennessee corporation
|-- | ------------------------------------------------



|8. | Health and Human Resource Center, Inc., a California corporation, d/b/a Integrated Insights
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|9. | HHC Indiana, Inc., an Indiana corporation
|-- | -----------------------------------------



|10. | HHC Poplar Springs, Inc., a Virginia corporation
|--- | ------------------------------------------------



|11. | HHC River Park, Inc., a West Virginia corporation
|--- | -------------------------------------------------



|12. | PsychManagement Group, Inc., a West Virginia corporation
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------



|13. | AHG Partnership, a Texas partnership, 60% ownership
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------



|14. | HHC Ohio, Inc., an Ohio corporation
|--- | -----------------------------------



|15. | Friends Behavioral Health System, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, 80% ownership
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|16. | Laurelwood Associates Trust
|--- | ---------------------------



|17. | Laurelwood Associates, Inc., an Ohio corporation
|--- | ------------------------------------------------



|18. | Friends GP, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability corporation
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------
No. 10627.

#### Banning et al. *v.*The Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Mt. Vernon.

Decided June 2, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Knox county.

*Messrs. Waight & Moore,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. F. V. Owen*and *Mr. Wm. M. Koons,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shaucic, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 129 (Thursday, July 5, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 39655]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16419]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 199

[Docket ID DOD-2012-HA-0049]
RIN 0720-AB57

Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services 
(CHAMPUS)/TRICARE: TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense published a proposed rule for the 
CHAMPUS/TRICARE: TRICARE Retail Pharmacy Program on Tuesday, June 26, 
2012 (77 FR 38019). This rule is being published to withdrawal the 
proposed rule. The Department has decided to defer consideration of 
possible regulatory changes to the TRICARE Pharmacy Benefits Program 
for the present time.

DATES: The proposed rule published on Tuesday, June 26, 2012 is 
withdrawn as of Tuesday, June 26, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rear Admiral Thomas McGinnis, Chief, 
Pharmacy Operations Directorate, TRICARE Management Activity, telephone 
703-681-2890.

    Dated: June 28, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-16419 Filed 7-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. QF81-7-005]


ESI Calistoga GP, Inc. and Caithness Geysers, Inc.; Notice of 
Amendment to Filing

February 24, 1997.
    On February 21, 1997, ESI Calistoga GP, Inc. and Caithness Geysers, 
Inc. tendered for filing an amendment to its January 31, 1997, filing 
in this docket.
    The amendment pertains to the ownership aspects and steam purchase 
agreement of the geothermal small power production facility. No 
determination has been made that the submittal constitutes a complete 
filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or objecting to the granting of 
qualifying status should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or 
protests must be filed by March 7, 1997, and must be served on the 
applicants. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a petition to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4970 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### COMPANIA DOMINICANA de AVIACION et al., Appellants, v. Charles KNAPP, etc., Appellees.

No. 72-1402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 12, 1973.

Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellants.

Spence, Payne & Masington, Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, George C. Vogelsang, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge.

MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge.

Appellants seek reversal of the judgment in the sum of $600,000.00 entered in the trial court. The judgment is based upon the verdict of the jury in the suit of Knapp for the death of his son, Clyde, the legal cause of which was the negligence of the appellants in the operation of their airplane.

Reversal is here urged because, so appellants claim, the plaintiff parents, Knapp, were compensated for the loss of Clyde by the verdict and judgment in the sum of $1,-800,000.00, affirmed by this court for the simultaneous death of their other son, Clifford, who lost his life in the same negligently produced disaster. Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp, Fla.App.*941971, 251 So.2d 18. The record in the case cited clearly reveals that the verdict and judgment therein entered related solely to the son, Clifford. The pleadings were so cast, the case was so tried, argued, and the jury was so instructed. Likewise, the present case was so pleaded, and presented to the jury as to Clyde.

The appellants fail to demonstrate by the record error. Therefore, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

__________________________________________

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Milton Pineda, ) Docket No. 9418 

) 

Appellant. ) 

__________________________________________)

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW 

NOTICE OF APPEAL AND APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

On October 13, 2023, Appellant Milton Pineda (“Appellant”) filed a Notice of 

Appeal and Application for Review (“Appeal”) before the Federal Trade Commission 

(“FTC”), seeking to appeal the sanctions imposed by the Horseracing Integrity and Safety 

Authority’s (“HISA”) Horse Racing and Integrity and Welfare Unit on September 21, 

2023 (“Final Civil Sanctions”), pursuant to Appellant’s signed Admission of Equine 

Anti-Doping Rule Violations and Acceptance of Consequences (“Admission and 

Acceptance of Consequences”). Appellant also requested a stay of the Final Civil

Sanctions pending resolution of the Appeal (“Stay Request”). 

On October 24, 2023, HISA filed a response opposing the Appeal, asserting that 

Appellant’s signed Admission and Acceptance of Consequences waived the right to 

appeal to the FTC. HISA further offered to allow Appellant to withdraw the Admission 

and Acceptance of Consequences and to instead engage in arbitration proceedings before 

the Anti-Doping and Medication Control (“ADMC”) Program’s Arbitral Body, pursuant 

to ADMC Program Rule 7020(a) (providing that Anti-Doping Rule Violations “shall be 

adjudicated by an independent arbitral body”). 

On October 26, 2023, Appellant filed a Request to Withdraw the Notice of 

Appeal and Application for Review (“Request to Withdraw”). Appellant states that he 

wishes to withdraw the Appeal before the FTC and intends to accept HISA’s offer to 

allow him to withdraw the Admission and Acceptance of Consequences and engage in

arbitration instead. 

The Request to Withdraw is GRANTED and the Appeal is DISMISSED. The 

dismissal of the Appeal is without prejudice to any right of Appellant to seek appellate 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/27/2023 OSCAR NO 608837 | PAGE Page 1 of 2 * -PUBLIC 
PUBLIC

2 

review of any future adverse arbitration decision. Because the Appeal is dismissed, 

Appellant’s Stay Request is DENIED as MOOT. 

ORDERED: 

 D. Michael Chappell

 Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: October 27, 2023 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/27/2023 OSCAR NO 608837 | PAGE Page 2 of 2 * -PUBLIC
260 La. 1066

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Cline ESTHAY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52180.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 29, 1972.

In re: Cline Esthay applying for remedial writs and habeas corpus.

Application granted. The ruling below is reversed; the case remanded and the trial judge is ordered to hold forthwith and evidentiary hearing.
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT 23(a)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Oxford Health Plans, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-49738, 33-70908, 333-988, 333-28109, 333-35693 and 33-94242) on Form
S-8 of Oxford Health Plans, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 1999, relating to
the consolidated balance sheet of Oxford Health Plans, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive earnings (loss) and cash flows
for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 annual
report on Form 10-K of Oxford Health Plans, Inc.

                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 19, 1999


                                       90
#### Dianna Kay OXNER v. UNION NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 54485.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Union National Life Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 289 So.2d 229.

Application denied; considering that the policy had been issued and delivered, we cannot say the court of appeal is incorrect.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Kahn, Chair 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson 

Alvaro M. Bedoya 

FTC Matter No. P227704 

RESOLUTION DIRECTING USE OF COMPULSORY PROCESS TO COLLECT 

INFORMATION REGARDING SMALL BUSINESS CREDIT REPORT PRODUCT 

PROVIDERS’ PRACTICES 

Nature and Scope of Matter: 

To compile information concerning the policies, procedures, and practices of Small 

Business Credit Report Product (“SBCRP”) providers, including the method and manner in 

which SBCRP providers collect, use, analyze, verify, report, and market information about 

entities, and SBCRP providers’ marketing practices for products that purport to enable entities to 

monitor or supplement the information reported about them, pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 46(b). 

The Federal Trade Commission hereby resolves and directs that any and all compulsory 

processes available to it be used in connection with this inquiry. The Federal Trade Commission 

specifically authorizes the filing or continuation of actions to enforce any such compulsory 

process after the expiration of the three-year period. 

Authority to Conduct Investigation: 

Sections 6, 9, 10, and 20 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 46, 49, 50, 

and 57b-1, as amended; FTC Procedures and Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 1.1 et seq., and 

supplements thereto. 

By direction of the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

DATED:
EXHIBIT 10.8


                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") by
and between Electropharmacology, Inc. (the "Company") and David Saloff (the
"Executive"), entered into on August 5, 1996 (the "Employment Agreement"), is
made and entered into as of this 2nd day of February 1998;

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive agree that it is to their mutual
benefit to reduce the cash needs of the Company required for its operations;

         WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment
Agreement in accordance with the contractual terms and conditions set forth
below:

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants set forth herein, the
parties hereto agree as follows:


         1.2. Paragraph 5. Executive Benefits, subparagraph (C) is replaced in
         its entirety with the following:

         In lieu of the monthly automobile allowance in the amount of $1,000
         originally provided for in the Agreement, effective February 1, 1998,
         and each February 1st thereafter during the term of the Agreement, the
         Company will grant to the Executive a ten year option to purchase that
         number of shares of the Company's common stock equal to $12,000 divided
         by the last reported closing sales price of the Company's common stock
         for the day prior to the date of such grant as reported in the OTC
         Bulletin Board (the "Grant Date Market Value"). Each such option shall
         be exercisable immediately on and after the date of grant, with an
         exercise price equal to the Grant Date Market Value.

         3. To the extent not superseded herein, all other provisions of the
         Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the
day and year first above written.

                                               /s/ David Saloff
                                               ---------------------------
                                               David Saloff

                                               ELECTROPHARMACOLOGY, INC.

                                               By:    /s/ Arup Sen
                                                      -----------------------
                                               Name:  Arup Sen
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT Parent Coastal
Financial Corporation Subsidiary
  
  Percentage
  
  Owned
  
  State of
  IncorporationCoastal Federal
Bank
  
  
  100%
  
  
  United
  StatesCoastal Investor Services,
Inc.
  
  
  100%
  
  
  South
  CarolinaCoastal Financial Capital
Trust I
  
  
  100%
  
  
  DelawareCoastal
          Planners Holding Corporation
  
  
  100%
  
  
  DelawareCoastal
          Retirement Estate and Tax Planners, Inc. (4)
  
  
  100%
  
  
  South
  CarolinaCoastal Federal Holding
Corporation (1)
  
  
  100%
  
  
  DelawareCoastal Real Estate
Investment Corporation
  (3)
  
  
  100%
  
  
  North
  CarolinaCoastal Mortgage Bankers and
Realty Co.,
  Inc. (1)
  
  
  100%
  
  
  South
  CarolinaSherwood Development
Corporation (2)
  
  
  100%
  
  
  South
  Carolina  (1)
  First tier
  subsidiaries of Coastal Federal Bank.(2)
  Second tier
  subsidiary of Coastal Federal Bank and first tier subsidiary of Coastal
  Mortgage Bankers and Realty.(3)
  First tier
  operating subsidiary of Coastal Federal Holding Corporation, consolidated
  with Coastal Federal for Regulatory Reporting.(4)
  First tier
  operating subsidiary of Coastal Planners Holding Corporation. 42
#### Elizabeth BAKER and George Baker, Appellants, v. FLORAL PARK VILLAS 10, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1091.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### J. C. SMITH, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41135.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Francis COMPTON v. NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 53976.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1973.

In re: North River Ins. Co. and Inter-Cities Ready Mix Concrete Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 281 So.2d 848.

Writ denied. No error of law in judgment.
BOISE, IDAHO, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2021, AT 8:50 A.M.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

CHRISTOPHER LUCK, as legal

Guardian and Conservator for

ETHEL LUCK,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SARAH ROHEL,

 Defendant-Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 47506

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of 

Idaho, Kootenai County. John T. Mitchell, District Judge. 

James, Vernon & Weeks, Coeur d’Alene, for Appellant.

Law Offices of Kathryn Reynolds Morton, Kentucky, for Respondent. 

_______________________________

Christopher Luck (“Christopher”), as legal guardian and conservator for Ethel Luck 

(“Ethel”), appeals from the district court’s order dismissing a complaint alleging a negligence 

claim against Sarah Rohel (“Rohel”) for injuries Ethel sustained in a car accident. Ethel’s daughter 

Amy Clemmons (“Clemmons”), as purported guardian for Ethel, filed the complaint against Rohel 

on the last day of the statute of limitations. At the time she filed the complaint Clemmons was 

neither Ethel’s legal guardian, nor an Idaho licensed attorney. Rohel filed a motion to dismiss the 

complaint because Clemmons was not Ethel’s legal guardian and Clemmons was practicing law 

without a license. The district court granted Rohel’s motion and dismissed the complaint. An Idaho 

attorney then appeared in the case and filed a motion for reconsideration and a second amended 

complaint, requesting the court toll the statute of limitations and declare the second amended 

complaint to be timely. The district court denied the motion and struck the second amended 

complaint. Clemmons timely appealed. After the notice of appeal was filed, Ethel’s son 

Christopher was appointed Ethel’s legal guardian. Clemmons was thereafter dismissed from the 

appeal and Christopher, as Ethel’s legal guardian, was permitted to intervene on Ethel’s behalf.
5 

Attachment 1 

The relief provided by Exemption No. 5549N is limited to the certificate holders listed 

below1

: 

Airlines for America 

Alaska Airlines, Inc. 

American Airlines, Inc. and/or US Airways, Inc. 

Atlas Air, Inc. 

Federal Express Corporation 

Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. 

JetBlue Airways Corporation 

Southwest Airlines Co. 

United Airlines, Inc 

United Parcel Service Co. 

Additional Certificate Holders2

Air Transport International, Inc. 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

Frontier Airlines, Inc. 

MN Airlines, LLC (DBA Sun Country Airlines) 

Spirit Airlines, Inc. 

 

1 Attachment amended December 13, 2016. 2 Additional certificate holders petitioned for exemption through the following FAA Docket Numbers: Air 

Transport International Inc. FAA-2016-9085, Delta Air Lines, Inc. FAA-2016-8237, Frontier Airlines, Inc. 

FAA-2016-9441, MN Airlines, LLC (DBA Sun Country Airlines) FAA-2016-9136, and Spirit Airlines, Inc. 

FAA-2016-9440.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
                         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
                         EXTRACTED  FROM THE  STATEMENTS  OF  OPERATIONS  AND
                         BALANCE  SHEETS AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                         REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1000

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                           3,663
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    7,692
<ALLOWANCES>                     414
<INVENTORY>                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 11,694
<PP&E>                           13,639
<DEPRECIATION>                   8,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   19,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            10,110
<BONDS>                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      5,662
<COMMON>                         48,528
<OTHER-SE>                       (45,602)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     19,241
<SALES>                          25,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 25,868
<CGS>                            4,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    4,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 21,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (1,294)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                     54
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,736)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,736)
<EPS-BASIC>                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (.17)


</TABLE>