alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                             |                                                                                                                                                                       |                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                             |                                                                                                                                                                            |
|                                        |                                                                                                                                                                  |                                |
| *Date:              March              24, 2006* | By:                                                                                                                                                              | /s/ *Daniel              W. Rumsey* |
|                                             | *Daniel                W. Rumsey**Acting                Chief Executive Officer**and                Chief Financial Officer**(Principal                Financial Officer)* |
|                                             |                                                                                                                                                                            |

----
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 6, 2017














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of June 30, 2017 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$15,044Sub-advised funds1,423Institutional accounts4,457Total$20,924





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,667Small-Mid Cap3,440Mid Cap108Large Cap9,572All Cap Select410Long-Short4,960Corporate bonds656Core fixed income314(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(203)Total$20,924








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:July 6, 2017By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
#### Debra Nealy COILE v. James Gary COILE.

No. 61123.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1977.

In re: James Gary Coile applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 350 So.2d 934.

Writ denied.
260 La. 1070

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert M. THOMPSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 29, 1972.

In re: Robert M. Thompson applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. All issues presented by this application have been adjudicated in the original prosecution. See State v. Thompson, 256 La. 1019, 240 So.2d 899 (1970). This Court will not again pass upon issues already finally litigated. State ex rel. Barksdale v. Dees, 252 La. 434, 211 So.2d 318.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Clarence P. Burkhalder, Appellant.

County Court, Chautauqua County,

December 11, 1952.

*533
      *George W. Holt*for appellant.

*Edwin G. O’Connor, District Attorney,*for respondent.

Bodine, J.

Since the decisions in *People*v. *Parker*(192 Misc. 551) and *People*v. *Roberts*(195 Misc. 172), commenting on the effect to be given subdivision 1 of section 56 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, it has been construed by Justice Newman in *Matter of McNellis*v. *Fletcher*(197 Misc. 80, 82). The recommendation of the Governor’s Safety Conference Committee as quoted by Justice Newman *“*that the law relating to speed limits include a clause declaring that a speed greater than that which is *reasonable*and *prudent under the conditions*is a violation ” (italics supplied) was apparently the basis for the enactment of the statute and furnishes the clue to its interpretation. This interpretation follows the general rules collated by Justice Eder in *Matter of Carns (Ralph)*(181 Misc. 1047). Here, to my mind, is clearly a case where we are justified in giving effect to the apparent intent of the statute although it may be contrary to the literal letter thereof *“*for a thing within the letter of the statute is not within the statute if it is not within the intention of the law makers.” *(Matter of Carns [Ralph], supra,*p. 1055.) It would follow, therefore, that mere proof of an accident and injury is not sufficient to justify a conviction under the statute in the absence of proof that the car was being driven at a speed which could be said to be unreasonable and imprudent under the conditions present.

The undisputed facts as related by the People’s witnesses, no witnesses having been produced' by defendant, show that defendant was proceeding at an estimated speed of around forty miles per hour upon a village street in a residential section along which cars were parked and where there were children present. One of these small children darted out from behind a car and was struck by defendant. It seems to me that these facts bring the case within the application of the statute as deemed intended by the Legislature. The Trial Justice was justified in holding that under the circumstances defendant was not exercising the care and prudence reasonably to be required of him. It is useless to speculate upon what might have happened if he had been going much slower.

*534This conclusion giving effect to subdivision 1 of section 56 is not in reality inconsistent with the *Parker*and *Robert*cases relied upon by defendant, for they were decided on the merits in that the facts there present were held not to establish a basis for holding the defendants to any criminal accountability.

Judgment affirmed.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 22-19V

UNPUBLISHED

MOLLY CONVERSE,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: April 12, 2022

Voluntary dismissal; Order 

concluding proceedings

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On January 6, 2022, Molly Converse filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.

2

Petitioner alleged that she suffered a vaccine injury from the influenza vaccination she

received on February 13, 2021. ECF no. 1. On April 11, 2022, Petitioner filed a notice of 

voluntary dismissal.

In light of Petitioner’s “notice of dismissal at any time before service of 

respondent’s report” pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(1)(A), this case is dismissed 

without prejudice. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
#### Newell A. TAYLOR v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden.

No. 60583.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 11, 1977.

In re: Newell A. Taylor, applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ granted. Trial judge ordered to rule on merits of relator’s application for habeas relief.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 15.  Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information from KPMG
Peat Marwick LLP

Independent Auditors' Review Report


The Board of Directors
First American Corporation:

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheets of First American Corporation
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, the related consolidated
income statement for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September
30, 1996 and 1995.  These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Corporation's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of First American Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995; and the related consolidated income
statements, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 19, 1996, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Our report refers to changes in accounting principles related to the adoption
in 1993 of the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board's
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes; No. 106, Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions; No. 112, Employers' Accounting for Postemployment Benefits; and No.
115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.



/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP          
--------------------------

October 17, 1996
Nashville, Tennessee





                                      23
No. 00-739.

#### Belcher *v.*Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- Suffolk Construction Company Under Contract No. N40085-11-C-7231 APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59079, 59080

Thomas R. Gonnella, Esq.

Pannone Lopes Devereaux & West LLC Providence, RI Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Stephen L. Bacon, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 28 August 2014

ELIZABETH W. NEWSOM Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59079, 59080, Appeals ofSuffolk Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit A
Advisory Board Biographies


ADMIRAL BOBBY R. INMAN U.S. NAVY (RET.)
Chairman, Executive Committee of Science Applications International Corporation;
former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Westmark Systems, Inc.; former
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Microelectronics & Computer
Technology Corporation; Director, Fluor Corporation, Science Applications
International Corporation, Southwestern Bell Corporation, Temple-Inland and
Xerox Corporation.

ALFRED J. COYLE
Advisory Director, PaineWebber Incorporated; former Director, American DualVest
Fund, Cubic Corp., Leaseway Transportation Corp., Oilfield Services Corp. of
America and Radiation Dynamics.

RICHARD HODGSON
Co-founder and Director, Intel Corporation; Director, I-Stat Corp., Ibis
Technology Inc., McCowan Associates and several private technology companies.

EUGENE KLEINER
Founding partner, Kleiner, Perkins, Caufield & Byers; Co-founder, Fairchild
Semiconductor Corporation; Director, Andros Corporation, Resound, Inc. and
several private technology companies; Trustee, Polytechnic University in New
York.

ANTONIE T. KNOPPERS, M.D.
Former President, Chief Operating Officer and Vice Chairman, Merck & Co.;
Director, Centocor, Inc; former Chairman, U.S. Council of the International
Chamber of Commerce.

DR. GEORGE KOZMETSKY, D.C.S.
Executive Associate for Economic Affairs, The University of Texas System; IC
Senior Research Fellow; Chairman, IC Advisory Board.

JOSHUA LEDERBERG, PH.D.
Nobel Laureate; university professor and former President, Rockefeller
University; Director, Chemical Industry Institute for Toxicology, Dreyfus
Foundation and Council for Foreign Relations.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles E. WHITTINGTON, II v. 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF LAFAYETTE.

No. 61951.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Charles E. Whittington, II applying for Writ of Mandamus. Lafayette Parish.

Denied moot.
Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Bombardier Chester Liburski, 6110/09 No objection

Aerospace Glenn Baxter

Transport Canada Richard Topham 6/10/09 No objection

National Business Elias Cotti, Manager 6110/09 No objection

Aircaft Assoc Technical Services

(NBAA)

Regional Airline Dave Lotterer, 6/10/09 No objection

Assoc (RAA) Technical Advisor

1
#### Debra Nealy COILE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Gray COILE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13316.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Sept. 26, 1977.

En Banc. Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1977.

Writ Refused Dec. 14, 1977.

*935Ford E. Stinson, Benton, for defendant-appellant.

Campbell, Campbell & Johnson by John T. Campbell, Minden, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BOLIN, HALL and JONES, JJ.

HALL, Judge.

This appeal by the divorced father of a minor child is from the denial of his petition to enforce visitation rights previously granted to him in a divorce and custody judgment which awarded custody of the child to the mother.

Prior to the time the petition to enforce visitation rights was filed, a judgment was rendered granting the adoption of the child by the present husband of the child’s mother. That judgment was affirmed by this court, and a writ of review was denied by the Supreme Court on May 27, 1977. See *In re Coile,*343 So.2d 325 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1977), writ refused *In re Hanson,*345 So.2d 902 (La.1977). The adoption judgment is now final and definitive.

LSA-C.C. Art. 214 provides that the blood parent is divested of all his legal rights with regard to the adopted person. Issues relating to visitation rights prior to the adoption or pending the appeal of the adoption judgment are now moot. Moot issues will not be considered on appeal. *Cain v. Board of Supervisors, Ouachita Parish,*335 So.2d 711 (La.App. 2d Cir. 1976), writ refused 336 So.2d 871 (La.1976). See also *State of Louisiana ex rel. Preston v. Henderson,*283 So.2d 230 (La.1973). This appeal is, therefore, dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement  of Fleming Companies, Inc. on Form S-3 of  our  report
dated  February 18, 2000, appearing in the Annual Report on  Form
10-K  of  Fleming Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries for  the  year
ended December 25, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
June 30, 2000
#### Cheryl A. MARTIN v. Frank H. MARTIN.

No. 38094.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 80.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amendment to the Annual Report of SCOLR, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gail T. Vitulli, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Gail T. Vitulli
    ________________________________
      Gail T. Vitulli
      Principal Accounting Officer
      SCOLR, Inc.
      April 29, 2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to SCOLR, Inc. and will be retained by SCOLR,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Kevin
      T. Dunphy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Aduromed Industries, Inc.,
      (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





1.
      The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, of the Company for the three month period
      ended
      March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or
      15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      May
      14, 2007


/s/ Kevin
              T.
              DunphyKevin
                T. Dunphy
              Treasurer
                and Chief Financial Officer
#### PAN AMERICAN CONDOMINIUM NO. 3, INC. v. BIALKOWICZ.

No. 38124.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 767.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Statement of
 Chief Executive Officer And Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350
of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Joseph Mazin, the
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
of The Flamemaster Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that:

|1. | The Companys Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30,
2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1924; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Joseph Mazin
Joseph Mazin,      CEO and CFO 
      August 7, 2003