### Request for an Extension of a Previously Granted Exemption to Use CARES for Larger/Older Persons:

I am writing to request an extension of Exemption No. 10606 from 14 CFR (FAR SECTION) /faa

- 2012

- 0833 issued
to Jennifer Moore on behalf of Kristen Burkes

- Moore from certain requirements of § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption allowed Kristen Burkes

- Moore to exceed the specified weight limit for an
FAA

- approved child restraint system (CARES, manufactured by A mSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft. In addition, any air carrier operating under part 121 while Kristen
Burkes

- Moore was aboard its aircraft was also granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary
to allow Kristen to use an FAA

- approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft. My Kristen is currently 14 year’s old, weighs 80 pounds, and is 5’ 2 inches tall. My Kristen’s physical condition is as follows : Seizure disorder, developmental delays, cortical visual impairment . As a result of her physical condition, she continues to need the support and security provided by an FAA

- approved CRS, but because of her weight is incapable of compliance with the regula tion. I am also submitting the following contact information : Jennifer Moore c/o
Kristen Burkes

- Moore, jendmoore@hotmail.com , 101 Overhill Rd, Montevallo, AL 35115. The original exemption allowed Kristen to occupy an FAA

- approved CRS (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though she exceeded the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensured a high level of safety for Kristen and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in Kristen ’s case, safety is greatly enhance d by the extra support and security that the FAA

- approved CRS provides during the entire flight. Enhancing safety for Kristen is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use
of this FAA

- approved CRS allo ws her to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA

approved CRS, she would be unable to fly commercially. Since the original exemption was issued, there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to pub lic interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an extension of an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent requ ired for an individual to use an
FAA

- Approved Child Restraint System (CRS) on an aircraft, even though the individual exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA

- approved CRS, this individ ual would be unable to fly. We request that this individual be allowed to occupy an FAA

- approved CRS (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though the individual exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety
of this i ndividual is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA

- approved CRS will provide for this individual during the flight.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Jennifer Moore