Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2018 / Notices 27349 

the Interior NEPA implementing 

regulations. Additional information 

regarding the PR&Gs is available online 

at the website provided in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 

this notice. 

Cooperating Agency Status 

If, based on the Proposed Action, your 

agency believes it has special expertise 

or jurisdiction by law, as defined in 40 

CFR 1508.15 and 1508.26, please 

respond within 30 days of the date of 

publication of this notice to the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section of this notice. 

Special Assistance for Public Scoping 

Meetings 

If special assistance is required at the 

scoping meetings, please contact Mr. 

Sean Heath at (623) 773–6250, or email 

your assistance needs to NMUnitEIS@

empsi.com, along with your name and 

telephone number. Please indicate your 

needs at least two weeks in advance of 

the meeting to enable Reclamation to 

secure the needed services. If a request 

cannot be honored, the requestor will be 

notified. 

Public Disclosure 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: June 7, 2018. 

Terrance J. Fulp, 

Regional Director, Lower Colorado Region. 

[FR Doc. 2018–12575 Filed 6–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4332–90–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1119] 

Certain Infotainment Systems, 

Components Thereof, and 

Automobiles Containing the Same: 

Institution of investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on May 

7, 2018, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of 

Broadcom Corporation of San Jose, 

California. Supplements to the 

complaint were filed on May 18, 2018 

and May 30, 2018. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain infotainment 

systems, component thereof, and 

automobiles containing the same by 

reason of infringement of U.S. Patent 

No. 6,937,187 (‘‘the ’187 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 8,902,104 (‘‘the ’104 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 7,512,752 (‘‘the ’752 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,530,027 (‘‘the 

’027 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,284,844 

(‘‘the ’844 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

7,437,583 (‘‘the ’583 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by the applicable Federal 

Statute. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Katherine Hiner, The Office of Docket 

Services, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 

and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2018). 

Scope of investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

June 6, 2018, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of products identified in 

paragraph (2) by reason of infringement 

of one or more of claims 1–10 of the 

’187 patent; claims 1, 2, 5–13, 15, and 

16 of the ’104 patent; claims 1–10 of the 

’752 patent; claims 11–20 of the ’027 

patent; claims 1–14 of the ’844 patent; 

and claims 17–26 of the ’583 patent; and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘head units, rear seat 

entertainment units, units for displaying 

information or entertainment, and 

cameras, controllers, processing 

components, modules, chips, GNSS 

processing devices, and circuits used 

therein or therewith and automobiles 

that contain such infotainment systems 

and components’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Broadcom 

Corporation, 1320 Ridder Park Drive, 

San Jose, CA 95131. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Toyota Motor Corporation, 1 Toyotacho, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture 

471–8571, Japan 

Toyota Motor North America, Inc., 6565 

Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 75024 

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., 6565 

Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 75024 

Toyota Motor Engineering & 

Manufacturing North America, Inc., 

6565 Headquarters Dr., Plano, TX 

75024 

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, 

Inc., 4000 Tulip Tree Drive, 

Princeton, IN 47670 

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, 

Inc., 25 Atlantic Avenue, Erlanger, KY 

41018 

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, 

Mississippi, Inc., 398 E Main Street, 

Tupelo, MS 38804 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
27350 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 113 / Tuesday, June 12, 2018 / Notices 

Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Texas, 

Inc., 1 Lone Star Pass, San Antonio, 

TX 78264 

Panasonic Corporation, 1006, Oaza 

Kadoma, Kadoma-shi, Osaka 571– 

8501, Japan 

Panasonic Corporation of North 

America, Two Riverfront Plaza, 828 

McCarter Highway, Newark, NJ 07102 

Denso Ten Limited, 2–28, Gosho-dori, 1- 

chome, Hyogo-ku, Kobe City, Japan 

Denso Ten America Limited, 20100 

Western Avenue, Torrance, CA 90501 

Renesas Electronics Corporation, 

Toyosu Foresia 3–2–24 Toyosu, Kotoku, Tokyo 135–0061, Japan 

Renesas Electronics America, Inc., 1001 

Murphy Ranch Road, Milpitas, CA 

95035 

Japan Radio Co., Ltd., Nakano Central 

Park East, 10–1, Nakano 4-chome, 

Nakano-ku, Tokyo 164–8570, Japan 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations will not be named as a 

party to this investigation. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 7, 2018. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2018–12609 Filed 6–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed Second 

Amended Consent Decree Under the 

Clean Water Act 

On June 5, 2018, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed Second 

Amended Consent Decree with the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Ohio in the lawsuit 

entitled United States v. City of Akron, 

Ohio, et al., Civil Action No. 09–cv– 

00272. 

In this action the United States, and 

the State of Ohio in a cross-claim, 

sought civil penalties and injunctive 

relief for violations of the Clean Water 

Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., in 

connection with the City of Akron’s 

(‘‘Akron’s’’ or ‘‘City’s’’) operation of its 

municipal wastewater treatment facility 

and sewer system. Under the Consent 

Decree, which was approved by the 

Court in January 2014, Akron was 

required to develop and implement a 

comprehensive plan to address 

overflows from its combined sewer 

system and bypasses around secondary 

treatment at the wastewater treatment 

facility. That plan, known as the ‘‘Long 

Term Control Plan Update’’ (‘‘LTCP 

Update’’), which was approved by the 

United States in November 2011 and the 

State of Ohio in April 2012, sets forth 

specific projects that the City is required 

to implement, and identifies dates for 

completion of these projects. 

The proposed amendment modifies 

provisions of the 2014 Consent Decree 

that are set forth in the City’s LTCP 

Update. Specifically, the proposed 

amendment would permit the City to 

install a different biologically enhanced 

high rate treatment technology to 

address remaining secondary bypasses 

at its wastewater treatment plant; the 

2014 Consent Decree requires the City to 

use a BioActiflo system, whereas the 

proposed amendment would allow it to 

use a BioCEPT system instead. The 

proposed amendment also addresses 

requirements for four storage basins in 

the City’s sewer collection system. The 

City would increase the size of one of 

the storage basins, and would not be 

required to build the remaining basins. 

Instead, it would expand existing 

‘‘underflow’’ pipes at those combined 

sewer overflow (‘‘CSO’’) locations, 

which would allow it to optimize flow, 

increasing the amount of wastewater 

that it sends to the wastewater treatment 

plant. In addition, at three of the CSO 

locations, the City would install a 

variety of green infrastructure projects 

that are collectively capable of 

addressing specified volumes of 

stormwater. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

Second Amended Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and should refer to United 

States v. City of Akron, Ohio, et al., D.J. 

Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–3144/2. All 

comments must be submitted no later 

than thirty (30) days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

During the public comment period, 

the Second Amendment to the Consent 

Decree may be examined and 

downloaded at this Justice Department 

website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/ 

consent-decrees. We will provide a 

paper copy of the proposed amendment 

to the Consent Decree upon written 

request and payment of reproduction 

costs. Please mail your request and 

payment to: Consent Decree Library, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611. 

Please enclose a check or money order 

for $7.25 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the United 

States Treasury. 

Randall M. Stone, 

Acting Assistant Section Chief, 

Environmental Enforcement Section, 

Environment and Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2018–12521 Filed 6–11–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS 

ADMINISTRATION 

Information Security Oversight Office 

[NARA–2018–042] 

State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector 

Policy Advisory Committee (SLTPS– 

PAC) 

AGENCY: National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES