alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC Chandler Air Service, COMPLAINANT



### v. City ofChandler, AZ RESPONDENT. FAA Docket No. 16-13-05

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFRPart 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to March 10,2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination inthis case.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis **~~** 

# I-S/2Di6 DateCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### _:;:jV I HEREBY CERTIFYthat onJanuary



# ~) , 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime to March 10,2015, for FAA Docket 16-13-08 addressed to: Timothy I. McCulloch Gordon & Rees LLP 111 W. Momoe Street, Suite 1600 Phoenix, AZ 85003 W. Eric Pilsk Daniel S. Reimer Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell, LLP 101 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036
FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100 FAAAirports District Office, Phoenix, AZ 

## /l

**.~** 

## ..··... . .. (' 

# tJ.

**~~--.)** 

# f!ktlki{tt .

# t-ri<J,t--/ Clartdia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis
#### E. T. Renshaw, Respondent, *vs.*F. McVean, Appellant.

1. Judgment affirmed.

*Appeal from Moniteau Circuit Court.*

*Burke*White, for Appellant.

*Owens &*Wood, for Respondent;

Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action brought in the Moniteau Circuit Court by Eenshaw against McYean, for tearing down his fences and scattering his rails, for which alleged trespass a judgment for $100 was asked.

The answer was a general denial, and also attempted to justify by alleging,' that the place, where the fences were thrown down, was a public highway, had been dedicated as such by the plaintiff, and used as such by the public, &c., &c. The replication traversed all the material statements of the answer. The cause was tried by a jury, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for the sum of one dollar ($1.00). Upon looking over the whole record, the issues raised by the pleadings seem to-have been fairly submitted to and tried by the jury; the verdict is supported by the evidence, and no material error was committed by the court in giving or refusing instructions or admitting or excluding evidence.

Eor these reasons, the judgment will,

with the concurrence of the other judges, except Judge Adams, who is absent,

be affirmed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 798 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make the exception for 

returning workers permanent, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2019 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make 

the exception for returning workers permanent, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Returning Worker Ac5 countability Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RETURNING WORKER EXCEPTION MADE PERMA7 NENT. 

8 Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A)) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘who has already been counted toward the numerical limiVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:08 Feb 02, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H798.IH H798

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 798 IH

1 tation of paragraph (1)(B) during fiscal year 2013, 2014, 

2 or 2015 shall not again be counted toward such limitation 

3 during fiscal year 2016’’ and inserting ‘‘shall not be count4 ed toward the numerical limitation of paragraph (1)(B) 

5 for a fiscal year if that alien has already been counted 

6 toward such limitation during any of the 3 fiscal years 

7 immediately preceding that fiscal year’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101

Dear Secretary Abruzzo: 

### MAR 252014

. On MFJ,rch 19, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection (PADEP). This SIP revision pertains to the update ofthe Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) for the Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton Eight-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area's Maintenance Plan. Revisions to the MVEBs consist ofan update to the budgets with the use ofthe MOVES2010 model. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and**tec~nically** complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a direct final rulemaking notice.
Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr, at 215- 814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director Bureau ofAir Quality, PADEP Sincerely,

# D\Qv~~ DianaEsher, Director Air Protection Division



# ... tJ Printedon I00% recycled/recyclablepaper with I00%post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. Customer ServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474
2 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 5 T e x a s R R C

­ C o m m e r c i a l R e c y c l i n g & S u r f a c e D i s p o s a l F a c i l i t i e s

h t t p : / / w w w

. r r c

. s t a t e

. t

x

. u s / o i l

­ g a s / a p p l i c a t i o n s

­ a n d

­ p e r m i t s / e n v i r o n m e n t a l

­ p e r m i t

­ t y p e s

­ i n f o r m a t i o n / c o m m e r c i a l

­ s u r f a c e

­ w a s t e

­ f

a c i l i t i e s / c o m m e r c i a l

­ r e c y c l i n g

... 1 / 1 

### C o m m e r c i a l R e c y c l i n g & S u r

f a c e D i s p o s a l F a c i l i t i e s

T h e f o l l o w i n g l i n k s c o n t a i n a l i s t o f a l l c o m m e r i c a l f a c i l i t i e s p e r m i t t e d b y

t h e R R C

. P e r m i t s a r e s e p a r a t e d a n d l i s t e d b y t h e i r c o r r e s p o n d i n g R R C

D i s t r i c t

. T h i s l i s t d o e s n o t i n c l u d e i n j e c t i o n / d i s p o s a l w e l l f a c i l i t i e s

.

D i s t r i c t 0 1

­ S a n A n t o n i o D i s t r i c t 7 B

­ A b i l e n e

D i s t r i c t 0 2

­ S a n A n t o n i o D i s t r i c t 7 C

­ S a n A n g e l o

D i s t r i c t 0 3

­ H o u s t o n D i s t r i c t 0 8

­ M i d l a n d

D i s t r i c t 0 4

­ C o r p u s C h r i s t i D i s t r i c t 8 A

­ M i d l a n d

D i s t r i c t 0 5

­ K i l g o r e D i s t r i c t 0 9

­ W i c h i t a F a l l s

D i s t r i c t 0 6

­ K i l g o r e D i s t r i c t 1 0

­ P a m p a

M o b i l e R e c y c l i n g P e r m i t s

L a s t U p d a t e d : 1 2 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 4 1 1 : 4 7 : 5 1 A M
#### Emilio MONFREDI and Joseph Papa, Jr., Appellants, v. Bessie MOORE, Appellee.

No. 69-815.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 28, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Lucie County; C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,387)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,524
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,647
<PP&E>                                          12,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,268)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           367
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,447
<SALES>                                         76,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,282
<CGS>                                           23,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,359)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,686)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.23)



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edeard BERRY, Ernest Boudray, Ray A. Harrison, Robert A. Champagne, John Edward, Simon P. Elliser and Pamela P. Sarvis.

No. 60461.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana, applying for writs of review, certiorari, mandamus and prohibition and supervisory writs.

Granted. The case is remanded for the correction of the sentence in accordance with our decision in *State v. Rugon,*No. 60,001.

DENNIS, J.,

dissents for the reasons assigned in *State v. Rugon.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:10-cv-01768-WQH -BLM Document 7 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

RESPONSE MAKERS, LLC, 

Respondent. 

) Case No. 10cv1768-WQH (BLM) 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 

RESPONDENT SHOULD NOT FULLY 

COMPLY WITH PETITIONER’S 

CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

On August 24, 2010, the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”) filed a Petition for 

an Order to Enforce a Civil Investigative Demand. ECF No. 1. Therein, the FTC explains 

that on July 28, 2010, it served a civil investigative demand on Response Makers, LLC 

(“Response Makers”), which directed Response Makers to submit the response materials 

by August 4, 2010. Id. at 4-5. Response Makers failed to submit responses by the 

deadline or to object or petition the FTC to quash or limit the civil investigative demand, 

as provided in FTC Rule 2.7(d)(1). Id. at 5 (citing 16 C.F.R. § 2.7(d)(1)). 

This Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter and to order Response 

Makers to comply with the Civil Investigative Demand. See 15 U.S.C. § 57b-1 (West 

1994). Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Response Makers, LLC appear before the 

Honorable Barbara L. Major on September 30, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom A, 

U.S. District Court, 940 Front Street, San Diego, California 92101 to show cause why it 

should not fully comply with the FTC’s civil investigative demand. 

 10cv1768-WQH (BLM) 
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:10-cv-01768-WQH -BLM Document 7 Filed 08/31/10 Page 2 of 2 

On or before September 16, 2010, Response Makers must file a brief providing 

legal and factual support for its failure to comply with the FTC’s civil investigative demand 

and/or the FTC’s procedures for seeking to quash or limit the civil investigative demand 

and explaining why this Order To Show Cause should not be granted. The FTC’s reply 

must be filed on or before September 23, 2010. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 31, 2010 

BARBARA L. MAJOR 

United States Magistrate Judge 

2 10cv1768-WQH (BLM)
**Docket Number FA**  **A -**  **2013 -**  **0833**
EXHIBIT
32.1
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
  SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Network CN Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Godfrey Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
   /s/
      Godfrey HuiGodfrey
      HuiChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      11, 2008
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 588

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Utah, as the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post al Service located at 20 South Main in Beaver,
103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 588

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, as the ‘‘Abe

Murdock United States Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

4 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo5 cated at 20 South Main in Beaver, Utah, is designated

6 as the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post Office

7 Building’’.
2

•HR 588 EH

1 SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in any law, regulation, document,

3 record, map, or other paper of the United States to the

4 facility referred to in section 1 is deemed to be a reference

5 to the ‘‘Abe Murdock United States Post Office Building’’.

Passed the House of Representatives May 24, 1993.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                            ------------------------
                                    FORM 6-K
                            ------------------------

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
                       PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL, 2014

                       COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-29832

                            CHELSEA OIL AND GAS LTD.
                (TRANSLATION OF REGISTRANT'S NAME INTO ENGLISH)

       -----------------------------------------------------------------
                              3200, 500 4TH AVENUE
                                CALGARY, ALBERTA
                                 CANADA T2P 2V6
                             (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL
                               EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                       Form 20-F [X]        Form 40-F [_]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (1): [_]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (7): [_]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes[_]       No[X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-




<PAGE>




                                   SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                     CHELSEA OIL & GAS LTD.
                                     ----------------------
Date: May 1, 2014                    By:  /s/ Jesse Meidl
                                          Name:  Jesse Meidl
                                          Title:  Chief Executive Officer









<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

 EXHIBIT

99.1      Press Release dated March 31, 2014

99.2      Annual Information Form dated March 31, 2014 for the years ended
          December 31, 2013 and 2012
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

       We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-2938) of Horizon Health Corporation; the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-36953) of Horizon Health
Corporation; and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-91761) of
Horizon Health Corporation of our report on Horizon Health Corporation dated
October 12, 2000 appearing on Page F - 2 of this Form 10-K. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report dated October 12, 2000 relating to
the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page S - 2 of this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 13, 2000
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Schwab, Margo" <Margo_Schwab@omb.eop.gov>, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, "Kymn, Christine J." <Chr istine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 12/20/2010 03:21 PM

Subject: Thanks, CO NAAQS submitted, awaiting any key studies and link to ISA etc.



### Thank you Lydia and Deirdre for the briefing on CO last week; very helpful, particularly as folks seem to

be so busy this week.

I have distributed the submitted draft for interagency review. When you get a chance to share key

studies and the link to the ISA, Risk Assessment and other materials, I will forward those to interagency

reviewers also.

FYI I have requested comments to OMB by Friday, Jan 14 th



### .

Best,

heidi
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(b)


               [Letter of H.B. Fuller GmbH to Mr. Peter Koxholt]

Dear Mr. Koxholt:

You are employed with H.B. Fuller GmbH (the "Company") on the basis of a
Managing Director Agreement dated October 15, 1998 (the "Agreement"). You are
expected to be assigned to H.B. Fuller Company, in St. Paul, Minnesota, for a
period of three years according to the terms and conditions of the International
Service Agreement dated May 1, 2001. This letter is to confirm the amendment of
the Agreement for the duration of this assignment.

1.   During your assignment, you will remain Managing Director of the Company,
     however, you will be removed from your position as Group President and
     General Manager Europe ASC.

2.   For the term of the assignment, the salary to be paid by the Company will
     be reduced to DM 104,400 p.a. This amount will be paid in 12 equal monthly
     instalments to your bank account in Germany.  The Company will make all
     necessary withholdings with regard to wage tax and social security
     contributions.  The annual salary will be adjusted in accordance to the
     annual adjustment of the income limit for the assessment of contributions
     to the German Social Security Scheme (Beitragsbemessungsgrenze).  An
     increase of the annual salary paid by the Company means a respective
     reduction of your salary paid by H.B. Fuller Company, so that your total
     annual base salary during the assignment will not exceed the base salary
     amount as provided in the International Service Agreement, which amount may
     be adjusted for periodic base salary increases.

3.   The right to give ordinary notice of termination as provided in Section 7.1
     of the Agreement is excluded for a period of 30 months beginning on April
     30, 2001.  Thus, either party may terminate the Agreement with six months
     notice with effect to April 30, 2004, at the earliest.  The right to give
     termination for cause (Kundigung aus wichtigem Grund) remains unaffected.

4.   Upon successful completion of your assignment you shall be deemed to have
     achieved age 62 for the purpose of your participation in the SERP, provided
     that your age upon your actual retirement does not exceed 62 years.

In addition, and on a permanent basis, this letter confirms the amendment of
Section 2.7 of the Agreement, to recognize that you have been provided with
Class II, and not Class I business travel accident insurance, in accordance with
corporate Policy.

Please acknowledge the acceptance of the provisions of this letter with your
signature below.

With kind regards

/s/ Albert P.L. Stroucken
-------------------------
H.B. Fuller GmbH
by Albert P.L. Stroucken
Representative of the Shareholder,
H.B. Fuller Company

Agreed:

/s/ Peter Koxholt
-----------------
Peter Koxholt

Date: May 1/st/, 2001
      ---------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         935,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,982,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                    68,700
<INVENTORY>                                  1,911,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,881,869
<PP&E>                                         877,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                 770,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,496,870
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,361,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,025
<COMMON>                                           451
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,035,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,496,870
<SALES>                                     11,477,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,477,179
<CGS>                                        7,473,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,109,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                274,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,630
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            242,874
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   242,874
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>