alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28670-28671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13181]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to

[[Page 28671]]

the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification 
Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 20, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 14, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 82 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2018-175, CP2018-247.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-13181 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

Date:       May 12, 2008

 
|   |   | Garry P. Herdler              |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |   | Garry P. Herdler              |
|   |   | Executive Vice President  and |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
#### BANK OF CLEARWATER, a Florida banking corporation, Appellant, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-172.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 2, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
Title: Domestic NewAction Worksheet with 58 

## Record ofContacts DMS Docket No. 

## FAA~IO:-O~

# "l.7, QPM# AIR-ANM-030-F7 Date: 9101/2007 

### Revision

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA,IR.A.A, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Person Contacte~ Date ATA Joe White I 9/21109 Boeing Richard Brooks I 5/15/09 I
### -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 38 40 42 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### Marilyn L. THORN, Appellant, v. C. Jordan THORN, Appellee.

No. 71-620.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Hon. E. H. Griffin 

District Attorney 

Young County 

Graham, Texas 

Opinion No, ~~-556 

Re: Whether the Civil Air Patrol 

is exempt from the payment 

of the license fee for motor 

vehicles under the provisions 

Dear Mr. Griffin: of Article 6675 A-3, V.A.C.S. 

In your letter of December 23, 1958, you ask whether 

or not vehicles owned by the United States Government and 

loaned to the Civil Air Patrol are exempt where %ch vehicles 

are used exclusively in the work of the Civil Air Patrol. 

In an opinion by this office dated August 4th, 1958, 

Opinion No. W-487, it was decided that the Civil Air Patrol 

is not a United States Governmental Agency and that vehicles 

owned and used by them are not entitled to the exemption provided in Article 6675a-3(e). 

Inasmuch as Article 6675a-3(e) exempts only "vehicles 

which are the property of and used excluslvelx in the service 

of the United States Government . , ."(italics added); and, 

inasmuch as the Civil Air Patrol is not a United States Governmental Agency; and, even though the title to the cars is in 

the United States Government, they are not used exclusively 

by the Government. It is our opinion that such cars must be 

registered in accordance with Article 6675a-2. 

SUMMARY 

Since Civil Air Patrol is not a United States 

Governmental Agency, automobiles loaned to it 

by a U. S. Governmental Agency must be registered in accordance with Article 6675a-2. 
Honorable Griffin, page 2 (~~-556) 

Very truly yours, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

by 

John C. Phillips 

Assistant 

JCP:fd 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE: 

Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman 

Gordon C, Cass 

J. C. Davis, Jr. 

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: 

W. V. Geppert
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jeffrey P. Devaney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            By:  /s/ Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                 -----------------------
                                                  Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (Principal Financial and
                                                  Accounting Officer)

                                                 September 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1113

JOY A. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARGENBRIGHT, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-00-821-A)

Submitted: August 10, 2001 Decided: October 9, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sheila Venable, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Charles A.

Hawkins, Sheldon W. Snipe, TROUTMAN SANDERS, L.L.P., Atlanta,

Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Joy A. Anderson appeals the district court order granting

summary judgment to Argenbright, Inc., denying her motion for

summary judgment and dismissing her employment discrimination

complaint. Anderson also appeals the district court’s failure to

award her punitive damages and to defer ruling on a motion in

limine. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

findings from the bench and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Anderson v. Argenbright, Inc., CA-00-821-A (E.D. Va.

Dec. 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 593

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the business deduction

for any amount paid or incurred for regularly scheduled air transportation to the extent such amount exceeds the normal tourist class

fare for such transportation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. JACOBS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Ways and Means

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the

business deduction for any amount paid or incurred for

regularly scheduled air transportation to the extent such

amount exceeds the normal tourist class fare for such

transportation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That (a) section 162 of the Internal Revenue Code of

4 1986 (relating to trade or business expenses) is amended

5 by redesignating subsection (m) as subsection (n) and by

6 inserting after subsection (l) the following new subsection:
2

HR 593 IH

1 ‘‘(m) DEDUCTION FOR REGULARLY SCHEDULED AIR

2 TRANSPORTATION LIMITED TO NORMAL TOURIST CLASS

3 FARE.—

4 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No deduction shall be al5 lowed under subsection (a) or under section 212 for

6 any amount paid or incurred for the transportation

7 of any person by air on a regularly scheduled flight

8 to the extent that such amount exceeds the normal

9 tourist class fare for such transportation on such

10 flight.

11 ‘‘(2) NORMAL TOURIST CLASS FARE.—For pur12 poses of paragraph (1), the term ‘normal tourist

13 class fare’ means the lowest fare charged for the

14 transportation of a person by air on a regularly

15 scheduled flight determined without regard to any

16 special fares available to groups or certain persons

17 or under certain special conditions.’’.

18 (b) The amendments made by subsection (a) shall

19 apply to amounts paid or incurred after the date of the

20 enactment of this Act for transportation beginning after

21 such date.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7898 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7898

 To amend title XXX of the Public Health Services Act to provide for a 
technical correction to provide the Inspector General of the Department 
    of Health and Human Service certain authorities with respect to 
    investigations of information blocking, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2020

Mr. Burgess (for himself and Mr. Welch) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XXX of the Public Health Services Act to provide for a 
technical correction to provide the Inspector General of the Department 
    of Health and Human Service certain authorities with respect to 
    investigations of information blocking, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 3022(b) of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 300jj-52(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(4) Application of authorities under inspector general 
        act of 1978.--In carrying out this subsection, the Inspector 
        General shall have the same authorities as provided under 
        section 6 of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. 
        App.).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the 21st Century Cures 
Act (Public Law 114-255).
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen A. Sherwin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Cell Genesys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Cell Genesys, Inc.

Dated:  March 31, 2003

By: /s/ Stephen A. Sherwin, M.D

Name: Stephen A. Sherwin, M.D.

Title:   Chief Executive Officer



---

I, Matthew J. Pfeffer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Annual Report of Cell Genesys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Cell Genesys, Inc.

Dated:  March 31, 2003

By: /s/ Matthew J. Pfeffer

Name: Matthew J. Pfeffer

Title:   Chief Financial Officer





---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Exam USA, Inc. AnnualReport on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Yoneji Hirabayashi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.             Suchannual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of Exam USA, Inc..

 
| Date:   October 13, 2004 |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
|                          | By:    | /s/ Yoneji Hirabayashi |
|                          |   |   | Yoneji  Hirabayashi |
|                          |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has beenprovided to Exam USA, Inc. and will be retained by Exam USA, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7896 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7896

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the carbon capture 
credit to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the carbon oxide 
                       sequestration tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2020

 Mr. Bergman (for himself and Mrs. Fletcher) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the carbon capture 
credit to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the carbon oxide 
                       sequestration tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Redeeming Effectiveness to Carbon 
Oxide Utilization Plus Sequestration Act of 2020'' or ``RECOUPS Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED EFFICIENCY ELECTION FOR CARBON OXIDE SEQUESTRATION 
              CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45Q(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(8) Efficiency election.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of any carbon 
                capture equipment placed in service on or after the 
                date of the enactment of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 
                2018, a taxpayer that claims a carbon oxide 
                sequestration credit for any taxable year may elect to 
                treat the credit as a payment in excess of the tax 
                imposed, or the estimated tax payment required, by 
                subtitle A to the extent such credit exceeds the tax 
                liability of such taxpayer in such taxable year.
                    ``(B) Limitation.--If the taxpayer described in 
                subparagraph (A) makes an election under this paragraph 
                (in such time and manner as the Secretary may prescribe 
                by regulations), the dollar amounts applicable under 
                paragraph (3) or (4) of subsection (a) shall be 90 
                percent of the applicable dollar amount determined 
                under paragraph (1) of subsection (b).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We haveissued our report dated March 29, 2011, with respect to the financial statements included in the Annual Report of SCOLR Pharma, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference of said report in the Registration Statements of SCOLR Pharma, Inc. on Form S-2 (File No. 333-107906, effective October 30, 2003) and on Form S-8 (File No. 666-161722, effective September 4, 2009; FileNo. 333-116922, effective June 28, 2004; File No. 333-40290, effective June 28, 2000; and File No. 333-79343, effective May 26, 1999). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 29, 2011
(Online Data Reporting) 

            By logging into this agency computer system, you acknowledge and consent to the monitoring of this system.             Evidence of your use, authorized or unauthorized, collected during monitoring may be used for civil,             criminal, administrative, or other adverse action. Unauthorized or illegal use may subject you to prosecution.             This computer system, including all related equipment, networks, and network devices (including Internet access),             is provided by the Department of the Interior (DOI) in accordance with the agency policy for official use             and limited personal use. All agency computer systems may be monitored for all lawful purposes,             including but not limited to, ensuring that use is authorized, for management of the system, to             facilitate protection against unauthorized access, and to verify security procedures, survivability             and operational security. Any information on this computer system may be examined, recorded, copied and used for             authorized purposes at any time. All information, including personal information, placed or sent over this             system may be monitored, and users of this system are reminded that such monitoring does occur.             Therefore, there should be no expectation of privacy with respect to use of this system.        

            If you are a returning user, and do not have a login.gov account, click the login button and create an account with login.gov             using the same email you used to create your account on this site. If there are any issues regarding the INAD Database contact us at             inad_db@fws.gov.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) OR 15d-15(e) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Thomas C. Edwards, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of DynEco Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
   business issuer as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
   for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business
   issuer and have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
   disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
   ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
   including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
   those entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being
   prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
   controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
   the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
   the year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
   internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
   business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
   reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
   control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
   based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
   reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
   small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
   equivalent functions):

   a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
   operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
   likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
   process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
   employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
   control over financial reporting.

 Date: March 29, 2005

 /s/ Thomas C. Edwards
 ---------------------
 Thomas C. Edwards
 Chief Executive Officer