alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.1



Computation of Earnings Per Share



The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, included in this
report as Exhibit 13.3



Earnings Per Share



Net Income /

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period



|                                    |  |                              |  |          
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ---------
|                                    |  | Three months ended March 31,
|                                    |  | 2004                         |  | 2003     
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  | 1,528,443                    |  | 1,538,443
|Net Income                          |  | 658,740                      |  | 619,471  
|Per Share Amount                    |  | .43                          |  | .40      



No
common stock equivalents exist.



28
#### John DAVIS et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY et al., Defendants-Relators.

No. 3632.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 16, 1971.

Voorhies, Labbé, Fontenot, Leonard & McGlasson by J. Winston Fontenot, Lafayette, for defendants-relators.

Frank M. Brame, of Brame, Stewart & Bergstedt, Plauche, Sanders, Smith & Hebert by Allen L. Smith, Jr., Scofield & Bergstedt by John B. Scofield, Hall, Raggio & Farrar by Richard B. Cappel, Jones, Kimball, Patin, Harper, Tete & Wetherill by John A. Patin, Hunt, Godwin, Painter & Roddy by E. C. Hunt, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-respondent.

O. J. Weber, Beaumont, Tex., for respondent-plaintiff.

Raleigh Newman, McLeod & Rozas by William L. McLeod, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CUL-PEPPER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in Stanford Benoit et al. v. International Harvester Company et al., 251 So.2d 389 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1971), decided this date, the order of the trial court requiring defendant, Mack Abraham, to produce documents of his financial ability is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views herein expressed. Costs of this proceeding are assessed to Prior Products, Inc., Respondent in Opposition to Writs.

Reversed and remanded.
#### CAPITAL SECURITY COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.

No. P-228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 17, 1972.

Carl R. Pennington, Jr., and N. Sanders Sauls, of Ervin, Pennington, Varn & Jacobs, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Geoffrey B. Dobson and' Barbara Ann McPherson, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Fred A. Gysi,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Fred A. Gysi        |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Fred A. Gysi            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | March 31, 2003          |

 

----
#### Robert Edward MAHLMAN, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellants, v. John Archie JACKSON, Appellee.

No. 73-628.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 19, 1974.

. Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl and Wayne Gill, Miami, for appellants.

Fuller, Brumer, Moss & Cohen, Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Welcher, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendants in the trial court appeal a final judgment for the plaintiff which was entered pursuant to a jury verdict. The single point presented for our review *248urges that the trial court committed prejudicial error by a comment made in ruling upon plaintiff’s objection to an argument offered by defendants’ counsel during closing argument.

After reviewing the record, including the trial court’s remarks to the jury at the request of defendants’ counsel after the error occurred, and considering the circumstances of this case and the verdict rendered, we hold that no prejudicial error occurred. See Crews v. Warren, Fla. App.1963, 157 So.2d 553.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
American HealthChoice, Inc.

     We consent to incorporation by reference into the
registration statement on Form S-8 of American HealthChoice, Inc.
pertaining to the issuance of 4,500,000 shares of common stock
under the Legal Services Agreement, of our report dated
December 12, 2003, relating to the balance sheet of American
HealthChoice, Inc. as of September 30, 2003 and the related
statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, which report appears
in the Form 10-KSB of the Company dated September 30, 2003, as
filed December 29, 2003.

     /s/ LANE GORMAN & TRUBITT, L.L.P.



Dallas, Texas
April 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            By:  /s/ James T. Barry

                                                 James T. Barry
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

                                                  March 17, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF FOREST OIL CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 that is being filed concurrently
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of Forest Oil Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that:



|               |  | /s/H. CRAIG CLARK                                   
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|August 7, 2008 |  | H. Craig Clark
President and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7280
CARLON EDWARD PITTMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94-855-2) Submitted: February 6, 1996 Decided: May 9, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlon Edward Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pittman v. Angelone , No. CA-94-855-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SNODGRASS

Certified Public Accountants and Consultants



EXHIBIT 99.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Board of Directors

First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc.



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West Virginia Bancorp,
Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary as of June 30, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders
equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.



We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially
less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.



Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any
material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in
our report dated February 6, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ S.R. Snodgrass A.C.
|Wheeling, West Virginia
|August 4, 2004         



S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
<PAGE>   1





                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-2938) of Horizon Health Corporation and the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-36953) of Horizon Health Corporation
of our report on Horizon Health Corporation dated October 14, 1999 appearing on
Page F - 2 of this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference
of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page S - 2
of this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
November 4, 1999
#### Mary V. LUTZ, Petitioner, v. GATEWAY SPORTING GOODS CO. and Insurance Company of North America et al., Respondents.

No. 43445.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT 21.1

THE PMI GROUP, INC.  SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                                       |  |                              
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary Name                                                        |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|PMI Mortgage Insurance Co.                                             |  | Arizona                      
|PMI Capital Corporation                                                |  | Delaware                     
|PMI Insurance Co.                                                      |  | Arizona                      
|PMI Mortgage Guaranty Co.                                              |  | Arizona                      
|Residential Insurance Co.                                              |  | Arizona                      
|PMI Mortgage Insurance Holdings Canada Inc.                            |  | Canada                       
|PMI Europe Holdings Limited                                            |  | Ireland                      
|PMI Plaza LLC                                                          |  | Delaware                     
|CMG Mortgage Insurance Company (unconsolidated, partially owned)       |  | Wisconsin                    
|CMG Mortgage Assurance Company (unconsolidated, partially owned)       |  | Wisconsin                    
|FGIC Corporation (unconsolidated, partially owned)                     |  | Delaware                     
|Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (unconsolidated, partially owned) |  | Delaware                     
|PMI Mortgage Services Co.                                              |  | California                   
|PMI Mortgage Assurance Co.                                             |  | Arizona
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2020

No. 04-19-00812-CV

Ken KINSEY and Arty Straehla,

Appellants

v.

AL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellees

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI22581

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s First Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to May 7, 2020.

It is so ORDERED on this 21st day of April, 2020.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule for For Better Living, Inc. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-27-1997 
<CASH>                                          3,742,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,173,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,102,000
<INVENTORY>                                    11,810,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               38,558,000
<PP&E>                                         46,198,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,289,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 58,484,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          14,393,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           44,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,505,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   58,484,000
<SALES>                                        28,259,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               28,316,000
<CGS>                                          18,801,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,634,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                9,833,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (7,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                589,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,325,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                      534,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               791,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      791,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.90
        


</TABLE>
#### Joe N. PRYOR, Appellant, v. Elsie PRYOR, Appellee.

No. Q-378.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 8, 1973.

Walter L. Robinson, of Mathews, Osborne & Ehrlich, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Wayne E. Ripley, Jacksonville, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal, appellant husband seeks modification of that portion of a final decree of divorce concerning alimony payments. The proceedings heard before the trial judge were not reported. Both parties have gratuitously proffered to this court matters and things which they state were presented to the trial judge at the modification hearing. However, we are not privileged to consider tendered “facts” from each party, resolve same, and in this manner construct a record. The rule is well settled that orders determining factual conflicts come tO' this court with a presumption of correctness. In the absence of a sufficient record demonstrating an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge, an appellate court will not disturb the findings of the trial judge.

The judgment appealed is affirmed without prejudice to appellant in again petitioning the trial court for modification of the final decree.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and POWELL, GILLIS E., Associate Judge, concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Theresa Kingsberry, Program Support Specialist, Federal Trade Commission Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room CC-5301, Washington, DC 20024 (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-13188 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 August 1, 2005

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of July 31, 2005, preliminary assets under management totaled
$886.8 million.  Following is a summary of assets under management as of
July 31, 2005 (in millions):

				Equity	Fixed Income	   Total
Individually Managed Accounts	$228.3	      $132.8      $361.1
Mutual Funds			 368.0	        73.3       441.3
Private Investment Partnership    84.4	         0.0        84.4
                                ------        ------      ------
Total				 680.7	       206.1       886.8


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: August 1, 2005  	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary