alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case l:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1443-1 Filed 06/06/23 Page 1 of 4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

SOUTHERN DIVISION

In re SANCTUARY BELIZE LITIGATION No: 18-CV-3309-PJM

[PROPOSED] ORDER REFORMING AND REAFFIRMING THE FINAL ORDERS

Whereas, the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") through DE 1404 submitted its Motion

to Reform and Reaffirm Final Orders, to account for the Fourth Circuit's ruling on appeal, DE

1377-1, including requiring the Defendants' to turn over assets to either the FTC or the Receiver

in accordance with the provisions in the De Noyo Order, DE 1194, and the Default Order, DE

1112;

Whereas, the so-called Represented Defendants^ opposed the motion, for the reasons,

detailed in their opposition, DE 1405, while seeking some affirmative relief, including the return

of assets previously turned over to the Receiver;

Whereas, the FTC replied in support of its motion, DE 1408;

Whereas, the Court gave the Represented Defendants an opportunity to submit a

proposed order detailing the affumative relief they were seeking, DE 1414, which the

j

Represented Defendants then submitted, DE 1417;

' Andris Pukke, Peter Baker, John Usher, Global Property Alliance Inc., Sittee River Wildlife

Reserve, Buy Belize LLC, Buy International Inc., Foundation Development Management Inc.,

Eco Futures Development, Eco-Futures Belize Limited, Newport Land Group LLC, Power Haus

Marketing, Sanctuary Belize Property Owners' Association, and the Estate of John Pukke.

^ Comprising each of the Defendants with the exception of Newport Land Group LLC.

Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1447 Filed 06/14/23 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1447 Filed 06/14/23 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1447 Filed 06/14/23 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1447 Filed 06/14/23 Page 4 of 4
EXHIBIT 10.3

June 29, 2001

      The undersigned vendor, Parker Mills & Patel LLP ("Vendor") acknowledges
that it has performed certain services for and on behalf of Vertical Computer
Systems, Inc. ("Company") for which invoices in the amount of the approximate
amount of $ 97,000.00 have been issued by Vendor. Company agrees that it shall
issue 2,621,622, shares of its common stock (the "Stock" herein) , with a market
price per share of $0.037 as of June 27, 2001, to Vendor's member, William K.
Mills; and Company shall cause to be filed immediately a Registration Statement
on Form S-8 registering the Stock, to permit the sale of the Stock as a means of
reducing Company's outstanding obligation to Vendor. Provided, however, the
Stock shall be sold into the public market in an orderly and nondisruptive
manner. In the event that the net proceeds, after deducting taxes and
commissions, from Vendor's sale of Stock are less than the amount of $97,000.00,
Company shall pay Vendor the difference between $97,000.00 and the net proceeds
in cash within 10 days of presentation by Vendor to Company of documentation of
the amount of net proceeds. Further, in the event that the total Stock sold by
Vendor exceeds $150,000, then, the remaining Stock will be returned to the
Company or, with the Company's approval, sold with additional amounts applied as
a credit for the Company.


Parker Mills & Patel LLP

By:_____________________________
   William K. Mills, member


Vertical Computer Systems, Inc.

By:_____________________________
   Richard Wade, President
#### A. P. ST. PHILIP, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. TAMPA BAY TOWING COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and The Atlantic Land and Improvement Company, a Virginia corporation, Appellees.

No. 68-618.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 8, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report  dated  August 29, 2003,  accompanying  the  financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Proginet  Corporation on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the  incorporation
by  reference  of  said  report  in  the  Registration   Statement  of  Proginet
Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-71068) effective October 5, 2001.



BDO SEIDMAN LLP


Melville, New York
October 1, 2003



                                       36
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Personal Communication with RMA, Tracey Norberg on the Management 

of off-Specification Tires 

FROM: Tab Tesnau 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

In follow up to the meeting of September 13, 2011, Tab Tesnau contacted Tracey 

Norberg RMA Senior Vice President and Corporate Council to explain how offspecification tires (and tire components) are managed at the tire manufacturing facility 

and their downstream distribution partners. 

The following was information provided by RMA on a phone call. These are not exact 

quotes. 

• “Factory scrap” or “off-specification” tires are contractually arranged to be 

collected, managed, and transported between a tire manufacturer (including 

retailers or other parties involved in the distribution and sale of new tires) and a 

combustor. This would prevent disposal. 

• The tire manufacturers, as well as the manufacturers’ downstream distribution 

channels, have these contractual arrangements with combustors, typically cement 

kilns, due to the high heating value and beneficial contribution to the cement 

production. 

• Off-specification tires (including factory scrap tires), which include whole tires 

and tire components that do not meet manufacturer specifications, are collected at 

tire manufacturing facilities or manufacturer’s downstream distribution 

channels—retailers and other parties involved in the distribution and sale of new 

tires. 

• If at any point in the process, a tire component or whole tire is not suitable for use 

as a vehicle tire, it is separated from the other tire components (or whole tires) and 

is stored in a protected environment in order to accumulate a sufficient quantity 

for shipment. The management of these tires is tightly controlled. Proprietary 

information could be collected by competitors by analyzing the factory scrap tire 

components, particularly from the uncured components (not yet vulcanized 
through heat and pressure), so the tires are stored in a safe manner, in part, to 

prevent theft. 

• These tires are generated at a tire manufacturer (including retailers or other parties 

involved in the distribution and sale of new tires). The term “tire manufacturers” 

is broadly interpreted to include retailers and other parties that are involved in the 

distribution and sale of new tires.
## Delta Air Lines Comments on Part 60 Proposed Rule, Docket No. FAA-2014-0391, Notice No. 2014-04

**Section Description**  **Observation Rationale for change**  **Recommended Language**

Page 39462, Paragraph - Dates Send comments on or before

October 8, 2014 Send comments on or before October 8, 2014. The proposed document consists of 293 pages, including Appendix A and Appendix B QPS requirements. The proposal
includes cost and time estimates that we need to analyse based on information from internal sources for training program requirements and external sources for data availability and implementation. In addition we need to carry out a thorough review of the proposed Appendix A and Appendix B QPS requirements. We request that the comment period be extended by 90 days Send comments on or before January 8, 2015.
Exhibit 31Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 302 Certification     I, Russell A. Cronin, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, all reports on Form 8-K containing distributionor servicing reports filed and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of theperiod covered by this report on Form 10-K of National City Credit Card Master Trust and NationalCity Credit Card Master Note Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);     2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in the light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, (i) the distribution or servicing information required to beprovided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports and (ii) all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on myknowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statementrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and     5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York (Delaware).March 30, 2007       /s/ Russell A. Cronin, Jr.     Russell A. Cronin, Jr.    Senior Vice President of National City Bank, as Servicer
In the Matter of: 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

# RECEI\/ED FEB 062017 HEARING DOCKET

Joseph Maridon, Sr. DocketNo. FAA-2014-0116 FAA Case No. 2012WP190142 Judge J. E. Sullivan

NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY

To: Judge Sullivan and Respondent: Notice is hereby giventhat counsel will beunavailable the following dates in2017: Aprilll, 12, 17, 18; May 22 through June 8, inclusive; July 11 through July 21, inclusive; September 21, 22; October 5,6,12,13, inclusive; for the complainant inthe above-captioned case. Itis respectfully requested that no hearings be scheduled during this period. David F. Shayne Attorney EnforcementDivision, Western Team 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, W A 98057 Email: david.fshayne@JJaa.gov Telephone: (425) 227-2007 (main) (425) 227-2165 (direct) (425) 227-1007 (fax) Please address all further correspondence regarding this matter to the above address. Respectfully submitted, /-,,,

### 1(1_::_~ ( I DA"V'ilirs'HA'YNE FAAAttorney

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing Notice ofUnavailability has been servedthis date, to the following:

Federal AviationAdministration Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2Wl000 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Fax 202-267-1293 (facsimile and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested) Walter L. Ayers Ayers LawFirm, PLLC 1312 N. Momoe St., Suite 133 Spokane, WA 99201 Email: walter@ayerslawfirm.net (Email, and Certified Mail

- ReturnReceipt Requested) JosephR. Maridon, Jr. Maridon Law Firm 50S. Jones Blvd., Suite 102 Las Vegas, NV 891070 Fax 702-410-6396 (facsimile and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested) Honorable J.E. Sullivan Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. East Bldg., Ground Floor, Room Ell-310 Washington, D.C. 20590 Fax: 202-366-7536 (facsimile and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested)

Dated: 

## FEB 02 2017

JeffKa erg Legal Technician Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division- Western Team Renton, WA

DAVID F. SHAYNE, FAA ATTORNEY TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-1007
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-2714 Directorate ID: 2014-SW-052-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS332C1, AS332L1, AS332L2, EC225LP, AS365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 155B, and EC155B1 helicopters with a certain energy absorbing seat.

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 52 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this proposed Airworthiness Directive are intended to prevent objects 

from being stowed under the seat as these objects could reduce the energy-absorbing function of 

the seat, resulting in injury to the seat occupants during an accident.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $ Minimal

Labor per Helicopter

(.25 work hour X $85 for 

inspection)

$21

Other

(Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $21

Total US Fleet Cost $1,092

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.02


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of Benihana Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jose I. Ortega, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Jose I. Ortega
-----------------------------------------
Jose I. Ortega
Chief Financial Officer

June 15, 2007













                                       31
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each
of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Florida Rock Industries, Inc.

                                JOHN D. BAKER, II
                                John D. Baker, II
                                 President and Chief Executive
                                 Officer


                                JOHN D. MILTON, JR.
                                John D. Milton, Jr.
                                 Executive Vice President,
                                 Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                 Officer


                                WALLACE A. PATZKE, JR.
                                Wallace A. Patzke, Jr.
                                 Vice President, Controller
                                 and Chief Accounting Officer

	A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Florida Rock Industries, Inc., and will
be retained by Florida Rock Industries, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

   The foregoing certification accompanies the issuer's Quarterly
   Report on Form 10-Q and is not filed as provided in SEC Release
   Nos. 33-8212, 34-4751 and IC-25967, dated December 31, 2005.


1
EXHIBIT 10.19


                             AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                    VIASOFT, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


         This Amendment No. 1 to the Viasoft, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan is
made  and  entered  into as of the  30th  day of  June,  1998 by  Viasoft,  Inc.
("Viasoft").

         WHEREAS,  Viasoft has  previously  adopted the Viasoft,  Inc.  Deferred
Compensation Plan (the "Plan") effective as of July 1, 1997;

         WHEREAS,  Viasoft has  reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or
in part pursuant to Section 8.4 of the Plan;

         WHEREAS, Viasoft now desires to amend the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, Viasoft hereby amends the Plan as follows:

          1.   Section 1.2(s) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:

               (s) "Initial Election Period" for an Eligible Employee shall mean
               the 30-day  period  following  July 1, 1997 or the 30-day  period
               following  the  date  on  which  he or she  becomes  an  Eligible
               Employee.

          2.   The effective date of this Amendment shall be June 30, 1998.

          3.   Except as hereinabove amended, all of the terms and conditions of
               the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  Viasoft,  Inc. has signed or caused these presents
to be signed by its Chief Executive  Officer as required by the Plan on the date
first above written.

                               Viasoft, Inc.



                               By: /s/ Steven D. Whiteman             
                                  --------------------------
                                   Steven D. Whiteman
                                   Chief Executive Officer

                                      E-9
#### Harold Terry JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         67,331
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,429
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,767
<INVENTORY>                                    2,096
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               83,836
<PP&E>                                         87,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 698,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,630
<BONDS>                                        483,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,133
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   698,949
<SALES>                                        3,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,378
<CGS>                                          10,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,722)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             44,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,131)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010, (the
Report) of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                                   
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                               
|                        |  | Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                                   
|                        |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/Director                          
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                     
|                        | 
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Francie P. Reppy                                                              
|                        |  | Francie P. Reppy                                                                  
|                        |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | (Chief Financial Officer)