alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

| **Name of****Subsidiary**                                                     |   | **Jurisdiction of****Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Actar Airforce, Inc.                                                          |   | Canada                               |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Breas Medical AB                                                              |   | Sweden                               |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Marquest Medical Products, Inc.                                               |   | Colorado                             |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Sleep Services of America, Inc. (formerly, National Sleep Technologies, Inc.) |   | Pennsylvania                         |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Stelex—The Validation Group, Inc. (formerly, The Validation Group, Inc.) |   | Pennsylvania                         |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Vital Path, Inc.                                                              |   | Pennsylvania                         |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Thomas Medical Products, Inc.                                                 |   | Pennsylvania                         |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Vital Signs Limited                                                           |   | United Kingdom                       |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
| Vital Signs MN, Inc.                                                          |   | Minnesota                            |
|                                                                          |   |                                 |
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-19-00011-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 2018-46488

Style: Richard Andert Robins v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline dba Texas Bar

aka State Bar of Texas

Date motion filed*: September 16, 2019

Type of motion: Agreed Motion to Exceed Word Limit 

Party filing motion: Appellant, Richard Andert Robins

Document to be filed: Reply Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: September 26, 2019

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: September 24, 2019
#### CITY OF CAPE CANAVERAL, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. CEVESCO, INC., a Delaware corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1388.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 15, 1974.

Stanley Wolfman of Wolfman & Scott, Merritt Island, for appellant.

John M. Starling of Crofton, Holland, Starling, Harris & Severs, Titusville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In a scholarly opinion the trial court denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, thereby holding that the plaintiffs’ complaint stated a cause of action. Defendant brings this interlocutory appeal. We have examined the order and authorities relied upon with care and in light of the respective advices of counsel. We are satisfied that the trial court correctly analyzed the contentions and that the appealed order is free from error.

Affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C SS. 1360,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Proginet Corporation (the
"Company")  for the year ended July 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
Kevin M. Kelly,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Debra A. DiMaria,
Corporate  Secretary and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer,  certifies,  to
the best knowledge and belief of the signatory,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Kevin M. Kelly                      /s/ Debra A. DiMaria
-----------------------------------     ----------------------------------------
/s/ Kevin M. Kelly                      /s/ Debra A. DiMaria
President and Chief Executive Officer   Corporate Secretary and Chief Financial
                                        and Accounting Officer


Date: September 18, 2002
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 May 2, 2008

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of April 30, 2008, preliminary assets under management totaled
$5.131 billion.  Following is a summary as of April 30, 2008 (in millions):

				         Equity    Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts 	        $ 1,007	      $  118       $ 1,125
Mutual Funds (including sub-advised)      3,371	         156         3,527
Private Investment Funds	   	    479            0           479
                                        -------       ------       -------
Total			       	        $ 4,857       $  274       $ 5,131

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small and Small-Mid Cap         $    601
Large Cap and Select		   1,164
Long-Short		           3,095
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     271
				--------
Total			           5,131


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: May 2, 2008	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
Opinion issued June 1, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00 291
- C R

——————————— IN RE ANTHONY MORRIS , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator Anthony Morris (“ Relator ”) filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this Court to compel Respondent, the Honorable Nikita Harmon to “set aside counsel” and permit Relator in the underlying case “to proceed pro se with new2

counsel only as standby.” 1 We deny Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). All pending motions are denied as moot

. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Landau, and Rivas

- Molloy

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Anthony Dewayne Morris , Cause No. 1726848 01010 , pending in the 1 76 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Nikita V. Harmon presiding.
[PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Letterhead]


October 4, 2000

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We have read the statements made by Independent Bankshares, Inc.
(copy attached), which we understand will be filed with the
Commission, pursuant to Item 4 of Form 8-K, as part of the
Company's Form 8-K Report dated September 27, 2000. We agree with
the statements concerning our Firm in such Form 8-K.


Very truly yours,



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,282
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         866,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,021,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        534,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     454,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,021,637
<SALES>                                        37,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,170
<CGS>                                          20,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,488
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                10,439
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,439
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (384)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .37





</TABLE>
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-3343 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-078-AD

Helicopter Model: 

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): XXX Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this proposed AD are intended to prevent failure of the sliding door star 

support attachment, which could inhibit the operation of the sliding door from the inside, 

delaying the evacuation of passengers during an emergency.

Costs:

We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 261 helicopters of U.S. Registry and that 

labor costs average $85 a work hour. Based on these estimates, we expect the following 

costs: 

• Visually inspecting the control rod end fittings would require 1 work-hour and a

minimal amount for consumable materials for an estimated cost of $85 per helicopter, or 

$22,185 for the U.S. fleet.

• Replacing the control rod end fittings with airworthy fittings would require 5 workhours for a labor cost of $425. Parts would cost about $242 for an estimated total cost of

$667 per helicopter.

• Dye-penetrant inspecting the star support pin for a crack would require 2 work-hours

and no parts for an estimated cost of $170 per helicopter and $44,370 for the U.S. fleet.

• Replacing the star support pin would require 5 work-hours. Parts would cost about $200 

for an estimated total cost of $625 per helicopter.

• Installing three carbon fabric plies to reinforce the sliding door star support would 

require 5 work-hours. Parts would cost $200 for an estimated total cost of $625 per 

helicopter and $163,125 for the U.S. fleet.
2

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: David Hatfield
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

            Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Forest Laboratories, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the "Report"), I, Francis I. Perier, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.         TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

/s/ Francis I. Perier,Jr.         Francis I. Perier, Jr.Senior Vice President - Finance andChief Financial OfficerFebruary 9, 2007
---

April 9th, 2007

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the
      "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 
|    | Consent of Expert                          

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) to
be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual
Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

On behalf of Knight Piesold (Pty) Limited (Knight Piesold), I
hereby consent to the use of my name and Knight Piesolds name in connection
with reference to my and Knight Piesolds involvement in the preparation of a
technical report entitled Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the
Burnstone Gold Project (the "Technical Report") and to references to the
Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the Annual Report and to the inclusion
and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical
Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

Knight Piesold (Pty) Limited

/s/ Ronald Joe Scheurenberg

Ronald Joe Scheurenberg

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6444

STACY PHELPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

R. DAVIS, Food Manager, Head Supervisor; DAVIS

ROBISON, Warden; E. B. WALKER, Assistant

Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-169-2)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 24, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stacy Phelps, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal

is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Phelps v. Davis, No. CA-97-169-2 (E.D. Va.

Mar. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 21.1


      Registrant's Subsidiaries and States of Organization

                    As of September 26, 2000




                                             State of
          Subsidiary                         Organization
          ----------                         ------------

          Dougherty's Pharmacy, Inc.         Texas

          Park Infusion Services, L.P.       Texas

          Park LP Holdings, Inc.             Nevada

          Park Operating GP, LLC             Texas

          Raven's Pharmacy, Inc.             Texas

          Rx-Pro.Com, Inc.                   Texas

          Total Pharmacy Supply, Inc.        Texas
Exhibit 99.1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

       Dobson Communications Amends Credit Agreement and Files 10-K Report

OKLAHOMA CITY, March 22, 2004 (PRIMEZONE) - Dobson Communications Corporation
(Nasdaq:DCEL) announced today the bank credit agreement of its subsidiary,
Dobson Cellular Systems, had been amended to eliminate an ambiguity and
inconsistency in the leverage ratio covenant in the credit agreement to clarify
that leverage ratios are to be calculated based on the last four quarters of
operations, rather than by an annualization calculation. Dobson Communications
was in full compliance with the leverage ratio covenants in the credit agreement
at December 31, 2003, and, as a result of these amendments, expects to be in
full compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2004.

     Dobson Communications also announced that it has received an unqualified
report from its independent public accountants with respect to its December 31,
2003 financial statements, and that Dobson Communications' annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 was the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 19, 2004.

About Dobson Communications

     Dobson Communications is a leading provider of wireless phone services to
rural markets in the United States. Headquartered in Oklahoma City, the Company
owns wireless operations in 16 states, with markets covering a population of
10.6 million. The Company serves 1.6 million customers. For additional
information on the Company and its operations, please visit its Web site at
www.dobson.net.

Contact:

Dobson Communications Corporation
J. Warren Henry, Vice President, Investor Relations
(405) 529-8820
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>                            
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996
<CASH>                                             3,788
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    174,253
<ALLOWANCES>                                       3,304
<INVENTORY>                                       28,253
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 210,587
<PP&E>                                         2,639,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,448,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,443,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            214,365
<BONDS>                                          437,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          16,250
<OTHER-SE>                                       582,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,443,047
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 307,438
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    176,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                11,674
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   78,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                      30,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               48,113
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      48,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00
        


</TABLE>
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02383

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

02383\02383_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

x 02383\02383_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02383\02383_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02383\02383_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02383\02383_partA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02383\02383_partB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02383\02383_partC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02383\02383_partD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02383\02383_partD_Old.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02383\02383_partH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02383\Follow up\02383_Follow up_1.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

x 02383\Supporting Documents\02383_BGS A5-2.jpg Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02383\Supporting Documents\02383_BGS A5-3.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02383\Supporting Documents\02383_coverletter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02383\Supporting Documents\02383_EIA 860 (2009).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02383\Supporting Documents\02383_EIA 860 Sched 6 (2009).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02383\Supporting Documents\D3-1.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .