alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

                                  Subsidiaries
                                of the Registrant


The  following  is a  list  of the  Company's  consolidated  subsidiaries  as of
December 31, 2002:

                                                                   Percent of
                                                 State or            Voting
                                                Country of         Securities
                     Subsidiary                Organization           Owned
                     ----------                ------------           -----

The Beard Company (1)                            Oklahoma          Registrant
Beard Environmental Engineering, L.L.C.          Oklahoma             100%
Beard Leasing Company                            Delaware             100%
Beard Oil Company                                Delaware             100%
Beard Sino-American Resources Co., Inc.          Oklahoma             100%
Beard Technologies, Inc.                         Oklahoma             100%
Beijing Beard Bio-Tech Engineering Co., Ltd.      China               100%
Incorporated Tank Systems (2)                    Delaware              49%
Incorporated Tank Systems de Mexico,
    S.A. de C.V.                                  Mexico              100%
Interstate Travel Facilities, Inc.               Oklahoma             100%
ISITOP, Inc.                                     Oklahoma              80%
ITS, Inc.                                        Oklahoma             100%
starpay, com, l.l.c.                             Oklahoma              71%


(1)  The  consolidated  financial  statements of the Company include accounts of
     Registrant and the subsidiaries controlled by the Registrant.

(2)  Owns 100% of ITS, Inc. which in turn owns 100% of Incorporated Tank Systems
     de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

(3)  Excludes 80%-owned Cibola  Corporation.  Registrant does not have operating
     or financial control of this subsidiary.

(4)  Also excludes 50%-owned ITS-TESTCO, L.L.C. and TESTCO, INC. de MEXICO, S.A.
     de C.V.  Registrant does not have operating and financial  control of these
     subsidiaries.

(5)  Excludes those subsidiaries treated as equity investments.

(6)  Excludes  subsidiaries  which,  considered  in the  aggregate  as a  single
     subsidiary,  would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the end of
     the year covered by this report.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.45

April 10, 2001

Mr. Ron Caporale
eDiets.com Inc.
3467 Hillsboro Blvd
Suite 2
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442

Re: First Amendment to Content License Agreement
    --------------------------------------------

Reference is made to the Content License Agreement entered into between Yahoo,
Inc. ("Yahoo") and eDiets.com Inc. ("Licensor") on April 4, 2001 (the
"Agreement"). Unless otherwise expressly defined herein, all capitalized terms
used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. The parties
agree that the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

    1.  The parties agree that the Effective Date of the Agreement is as of
        April 4, 2001.

    2.  The last bullet point listed under the "Additional Terms" section of
        Exhibit A of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
        follows:

        Either party may exercise a one-time right to terminate this Agreement
        for [___________] on the date that is [________] from the Effective
        Date; provided that (a) the terminating party provide written notice to
        the other party on or before the date that is [_____________] from the
        Effective Date and (b) the termination will become effective
        [__________] days after the date that is [_____________] from the
        Effective Date ("Notice Period"). For clarity, this Agreement may only
        be terminated under this section if the non-terminating party receives
        notice of termination from the other party on or before the date that is
        [________] from the Effective Date; notices received after that date
        will be null and void. Notwithstanding the fact that the notice of
        termination may be given before the [_________] date, the effective date
        of termination will be [________] days after [_________] following the
        Effective Date. During such [__________] day Notice Period, the parties
        agree to discuss in good faith the possibility of amending the Agreement
        in lieu of termination upon mutually agreed upon terms and conditions.

    3.  Except as modified hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
        effect.

Please have a duly authorized representative of  Licensor execute this amendment
in the space provided below and return to Tiffany Monjauze at Yahoo! Business
<PAGE>

Development, 3420 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95051.

Sincerely,

YAHOO! INC., a Delaware corporation

By: ________________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ______________________________
Date: _______________________________


AGREED AND ACCEPTED
THIS 10th DAY OF APRIL, 2001, BY:


EDIETS.COM INC.

By: ________________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: ______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-36754 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8, in
Registration Statement No. 33-52506 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8,
in Registration Statement No. 33-62098 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8,
in Registration Statement No. 33-58637 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8,
in Registration Statement No. 33-58639 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8
and in Registration Statement No. 33-58017 of BJ Services Company on Form S-4
of our report dated November 23, 1999 appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of BJ Services Company for the year ended September 30, 1999.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
December 17, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1 SECTION 1350 Certification (Chief Executive
Officer) In connection
with the Annual Report of Coastal Financial Corporation, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Michael C. Gerald, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge: 1.
  The
  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
  The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
  of and for the period covered by the Report. This
Certification is provided as of December 14, 2006. /s/ Michael
  C. GeraldMichael C.
  GeraldPresident/Chief Executive Officer 46
#### Ozzie BENNETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 1738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1969.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and Peter N. Smith, Special Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Among other contentions, defendant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered all of defendant’s arguments which we find to be devoid of merit.

Affirmed on the authority of Williams v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 446.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, McCAIN and REED, JJ„ concur.
Exhibit 23

                 Consent of Independent Public Accountants
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports dated November 9, 1998 (except
with respect to the matter discussed in Note 17, as to which the date is
November 24, 1998), included in or incorporated by reference into Thermo
Ecotek Corporation's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 3, 1998,
into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8
(No. 33-91538), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-91542),
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-91546), Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (No. 33-91544), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
33-91548), and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-80753).



                                               Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
December 10, 1998
#### Robert Harold GRANTHAM, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-63.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 3, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  FROM FORM 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,900,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,200,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      18,543,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        18,190,000
<LOANS>                                    247,569,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,602,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             261,553,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 143,737,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                71,101,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          6,091,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,564,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             261,553,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             16,355,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              983,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               305,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,634,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,263,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,992,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,651,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   86,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               5,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,909,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,142,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,142,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,937,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.68
<LOANS-NON>                                    247,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              7,807,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,521,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,602,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,602,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,498
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              88
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,374
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     47,933
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           4,719
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             4,778
<LOANS>                                         91,477
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 156,931
<DEPOSITS>                                     137,750
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,495
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                890
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,045
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 156,931
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  5,771
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,428
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   299
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,498
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,331
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,474
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,929
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       96
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,176
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,176
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,454
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.84
<LOANS-NON>                                        288
<LOANS-PAST>                                       671
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,160
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       70
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,197
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,197
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             31
        

</TABLE>
#### James E. HUNN, an Alabama resident, and Smith-Kelly Supply Company, Inc., an Alabama corporation, Appellants, v. John BATSAKIS and Betsy Batsakis, husband and wife, Appellees.

No. O-89.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 11, 1972.

Charles R. Timmel, of Timmel, Handley & Campbell, Fort Walton Beach, for appellants.

*69Lefferts L. Mabie, Jr., of Levin, War-field, Graff, Mabie & Rosenbloum, Pensacola, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### Stephen Richard DIEHL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-483.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 23, 1969.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Robert E. Metzker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Arden M. Siegendorf and Ronald Sabo, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Devlin v. State, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 786; and Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 383.
263 La. 291

#### STATE of Louisiana v. George A. SQUARE.

No. 50412.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1972.

*230William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Hart-ley, Sp. Counsel, J. Carl Parkerson, Dist. Atty., Gilbert T. Brown, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

John G. Loftin, Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, George A. Square, was convicted of murder (La.R.S. 14:30) and the death sentence imposed was affirmed by this Court. 257 La. 743, 244 So.2d 200 (1971).

Citing Stewart v. Massachusetts, 408 U.S. 845, 92 S.Ct. 2845, 33 L.Ed.2d 744 (1972), following Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment herein insofar as it left undisturbed the death penalty imposed and remanded this case to this Court for further proceedings. 408 U.S. 939, 92 S.Ct. 2871, 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972).

We construe the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court to require the imposition of a sentence other than death. Cf., State v. Shaffer, 260 La. 605, 257 So.2d 121 (1971) and State v. Duplessis, 260 La. 644, 257 So.2d 135 (1971).

Accordingly, in compliance with the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court, the death sentence imposed upon defendant is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the 4th Judicial District Court with instructions to the trial judge to sentence the defendant to life imprisonment.

Case remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-21-2000
<CASH>                                          20,700
<SECURITIES>                                     2,305
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    119,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,348
<PP&E>                                         411,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 477,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          137,803
<BONDS>                                        161,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   477,786
<SALES>                                        166,956
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               166,956
<CGS>                                          111,341
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (949)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,334
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,334
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129254 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129254 

 COA: 250867 

Wayne CC: 02-011661-01 

KENNETH JAMES BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 14, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0320 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 27, 2006 

Clerk
#### Theodore T. KENDRICK, Petitioner, v. Ronald L. MYERS ex rel. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 72-396.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 19, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 14, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 8, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 442 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-166, CP2018-238.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-12746 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Joseph A. Santangelo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.  This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orleans Homebuilders, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

          2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: February 14, 2005

                                                  /s/ Joseph A. Santangelo
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Joseph A. Santangelo
                                                  Chief Financial Officer