alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 28, 2012

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Megan Lewis918-588-5325  ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners to Participate in
 UBS Natural Gas, Electric Power and MLP Conference
  TULSA, Okla. – Feb. 28, 2012 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the UBS Natural Gas, Electric Power and MLP Conference in Dallas on Wednesday, February 29, 2012.
   Pierce H. Norton, executive vice president and chief operating officer of ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, and Robert F. Martinovich, executive vice president, chief financial officer and treasurer of ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, will be conducting a series of one-on-one meetings with members of the investment community.
  The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites, www.oneok.com, www.oneokpartners.com, on Wednesday, February 29, 2012, beginning at 7 a.m. Central Standard Time.
 
 
 ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company.  We are the general partner and own 42.8 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas.  Our energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.  ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Stock Index.
  ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
  For more information, visit the websites at www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com.
  For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNewsand @ONEOKPartners.
  ###
Exhibit 23

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

O’Charley’s Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 333-151107, No. 33-51316, No. 33-51258, No. 33-83172, No. 33-69934, No. 333-63495, No. 333-59484, No. 333-126221 and No. 333-129783 on Form S-8 of O'Charley's Inc. of our reports dated March 10, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of O'Charley's Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 28, 2008 and December 30, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2008 and the related financial statement schedule, and the internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2008, which reports appear in the December 28, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of O'Charley's Inc.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN No. 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes in 2007.

/s/ KPMG  LLP

Nashville, Tennessee

March 10, 2009
#### Andrew Jackson MAYO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-454.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 16, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment and sentence appealed is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1



                                        FOR INFORMATION CONTACT
                              Eugene K. Friesen  (214) 823-9941



May 6, 1999

     DALLAS, TEXAS.Howard B. Wolf, Inc. (HBW-AMEX) Dallas based
womens fashion apparel manufacturer, announced that the
shareholders, at their duly called meeting today, approved the
Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution, pursuant to which the
Company will liquidate itself and distribute its assets to the
shareholders.
#### Claire M. ETTINGER, Appellant, v. Phillip ETTINGER, Appellee.

No. 70-274.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1971.

*503Sinclair & Louis and Frank Nussbaum, Miami, for appellant.

Cushman & Cushman, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises from a divorce action. The appellant-wife here seeks reversal of the Chancellor’s order denying fees for her attorney in conducting post-final hearing and post-final judgment matters involving the enforcement of the final judgment’s property settlement provisions. We reverse with directions.

At final hearing an oral property settlement agreement was dictated into the record. It was duly approved and, upon the granting of the divorce, was to be incorporated into the final judgment. It was to be drafted by husband’s counsel. Husband’s counsel asked to withdraw, but had not drafted the settlement agreement or final judgment. Wife’s counsel moved that the husband, appellee here, be required to do so, but husband’s counsel reappeared, and proposed a modified settlement agreement. The court entered final judgment for the wife, incorporating the original settlement. The husband failed to comply with the settlement agreement, so the wife moved to enforce the judgment.

Upon the authority of §§ 61.15 and 61.16, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. and Simpson v. Simpson, Fla.1953, 63 So.2d 764, we reverse the order denying the wife attorney’s fees and direct the chancellor to award reasonable attorney’s fees for services rendered from the date the appellee-husband refused to abide by the property settlement agreement which became a part of the final judgment.

Reversed with directions.
EXHIBIT 12(a)

                                FPL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<table>
<caption>
                                                                                               Six Months Ended
                                                                                                 June 30, 2001
                                                                                                   (millions)



                                                                                                    <c>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................            $ 329
  Income taxes ............................................................................              165
  Fixed charges included in the determination of net income, as below .....................              175
  Distributed income of independent power investments......................................               16
  Less: Equity in earnings of independent power investments ...............................               52

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................            $ 633

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ........................................................................            $ 167
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................                5
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................                3
  Fixed charges included in the determination of net income ...............................              175
  Capitalized interest ....................................................................               16

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................            $ 191

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................................             3.31
</table>
#### Jonathan ROLLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-1046.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

July 30, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Dade County; Jack M. Turner, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Phone: 520-562-2234 

Fax: 520-562-2245 

Fax 

Fax: cb>y&33& Date: &,-37-.~~ 

Phone: Pages: [ 3 includmg cover sheet 

Re: - CC: 

Urgent For Review Please Comment Please Reply O Please Recycle 

comments: 
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Air Quality Program 

P.O. Box 97 

Sacaton, AZ. 85247 

I Office: (520) 562-2234 Fax: (520) 562-2245 

Date: Lo-37-0d 

To: District 3 

We would like to request placement on the agenda for the upcoming 

Community meeting on 7 -3 -nb . The air quality program will make a presentation on the following 

subject: 

I)r/lflg~~~e of .Fko-Q ~clt.2~- 

P ~1 od &r cur4~&q ovdtj\a,lws. 

- The presentation will be given by JkWe \ mv is . 

Pas ie l h[&r 

Please call Janet Travis at (520) 562-2234 ext. 286 to confirm 

placement on the agenda. 

Than k-you 
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 

TIME : 06/27/2006 15: 05 

NAME : DEPT DEQ 

FAX : 5205622245 

TEL : 5205622234 

DATE, TIME 06/27 15:04 

FAX NO. /NAME 5622032 

DLIRATION 00: 00: 29 

PAGE (S) 0 2 

RESULT OK 

MODE STANDARD 

ECM 

Phone: 52G5W-2234 

Fax: 520-552-2245 

Fax 

Fax: -, Kb> - W3a Date: &--J7-~k, 

Phone: Pages: [ i11c1udn-g cbver sheet 

I 

Re: CC: 

El Urgent O For Review Please Comment Please Reply Plpase Recycle
Exhibit D p. 1 of 6

Exhibit D p. 2 of 6

Exhibit D p. 3 of 6

Exhibit D p. 4 of 6

Exhibit D p. 5 of 6

Exhibit D p. 6 of 6

- 1 MASTER SG2 SUPER GLUE_2GR1-040-547-0007
- 2 JB WELD 33106 SUPERWELD BRUSH ON 6G_1-040-654-0011
- 3 Stick Fast CA Extra Thick 1oz_1-036-665-0063-EX of product highlight in green
- 4 BROADWAY PINK GEL NAIL GLUE 2G PIPETTES_1-040-534-BGD102C
- 5 SAATI ULTRA FIX CA_CS-1-035-549-01
- 6 KISS MAXIMUM SPEED NAIL GLUE 3G_1-035-534-GL309080
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12946]



[[Page 28223]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2246-065]


Public Meetings Soliciting Comments on the Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement for the Yuba County Water Agency Yuba River 
Development Project

    On May 30, 2018, the Commission issued a Notice of Availability of 
the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Yuba River Development 
Project. The draft EIS documents the views of governmental agencies, 
non-governmental organizations, affected Indian tribes, the public, the 
license applicants, and Commission staff. All written comments must be 
filed by July 30, 2018, and should reference Project No. 2246-065. More 
information on filing comments can be found in the letter at the front 
of the draft EIS or on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Although the Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed.
    In addition to or in lieu of sending written comments, you are 
invited to attend public meetings that will be held to receive comments 
on the draft EIS. The daytime meeting will focus on resource agency, 
Indian tribes, and non-governmental organization comments, while the 
evening meeting is primarily for receiving input from the public. All 
interested individuals and entities are invited to attend one or both 
of the public meetings. The time and location of the meetings are as 
follows:
    Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2018.
    Time: Daytime meeting--1-4 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time. Evening 
meeting--7-9 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time.
    Place: Yuba County Government Center.
    Address: 915 8th Street, Marysville, CA 95901.
    At this meeting, resource agency personnel and other interested 
persons will have the opportunity to provide oral and written comments 
and recommendations regarding the draft EIS. The meeting will be 
recorded by a court reporter, and all statements (verbal and written) 
will become part of the Commission's public record for the project. 
This meeting is posted on the Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related 
information.
    For further information, contact Alan Mitchnick at (202) 502-6074 
or at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#52333e333c7c3f3b26313a3c3b313912343720317c353d24"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="badbd6dbd494d7d3ced9d2d4d3d9d1fadcdfc8d994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 11, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12946 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**
```

```
**CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
```

 Douglas W. Sabra, Chief Executive Officer of ForwardIndustries, Inc. (”Forward”), and James O. McKenna, Chief Financial Officer, doeach certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that, to the best of their knowledge:
    -  Forward’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
    -  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Forward.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 10th day of February 2009. 

 

/s/ Douglas W. Sabra

Douglas W. Sabra

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

/s/ James O. McKenna

James O. McKenna

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Rick’s Cabaret International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Phillip K. Marshall, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      December 29, 2008
                By:
                /s/
      Phillip K. MarshallPhillip
      K. MarshallChief
      Financial Officer/Principal Accounting
  Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 40655 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ANTONIO GARCIA

- ALBA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:17

- CR

- 817

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio Garcia

Alba has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia

- Alba has not filed a resp onse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein

. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 28, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-40655 Document: 00514812252 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2019No. 18

- 40655

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdra w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-40655 Document: 00514812252 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2019
#### Christopher CHAPMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-551.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 3, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Humes T. Lasher, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of DynEco Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
C. Edwards, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Thomas C. Edwards
 ---------------------
 Thomas C. Edwards
 Chief Executive Officer
 March 29, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FLORIDA PROGRESS CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 19, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000357261
<NAME> FLORIDA PROGRESS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-19-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        3,566
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,208
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,257
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           308
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     507
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,846
<COMMON>                                         1,274
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                913
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                   2,187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              300
<PREFERRED>                                         34
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             2,042
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  60
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     273
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      276
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                   1,674
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    6,846
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        3,358
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 3
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,875
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       2,878
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            480
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  11
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     491
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           153
<NET-INCOME>                                       338
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          1
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      337
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           164
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             357
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.42


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson 

Alvaro M. Bedoya 

In the Matter of 

HomeAdvisor, Inc., a corporation, 

d/b/a Angi Leads, DOCKET NO. 9407 

d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered by Angi. 

ORDER DENYING SUMMARY DECISION 

On March 11, 2022, the Commission issued a Complaint against HomeAdvisor, Inc., 

d/b/a Angi Leads, d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered by Angi (“Respondent”), alleging that 

Respondent engaged in unfair or deceptive practices in violation of Section 5(a) of the Federal 

Trade Commission Act, 5 U.S.C. § 45(a). On April 7, 2022, Complaint Counsel moved for 

summary decision on all counts. On April 18, 2022, Respondent asked the Commission to 

extend until May 27, 2022, the deadline to respond to Complaint Counsel’s motion, in order to 

allow Respondent to serve subpoenas on and take depositions of the individuals who submitted 

declarations in support of the motion. The Commission granted this request. Respondent 

subsequently sought an additional 10-day extension due to certain issues with the timing of 

discovery, and the Commission granted that extension as well. On June 6, 2022, Respondent 

submitted its opposition to summary decision, along with a request for oral argument. Complaint 

Counsel submitted their reply on June 14, 2022. The Commission scheduled oral argument for 

July 14 but moved the argument to July 21 on Respondent’s request. 

Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and arguments, the Commission has 

determined to deny the motion for summary decision because it has concluded that there exist 

genuine disputes as to material facts, and therefore a decision on the merits of Complaint 

Counsel’s claims should await full factual development at trial. Mindful of the parties’ need to 

prepare for the upcoming evidentiary hearing, scheduled to begin on November 9, 2022, the 

Commission is issuing this Order now and will issue a separate Opinion explaining its reasoning 

and addressing certain of Respondent’s affirmative defenses at a later date. Because there were 

1 
 

substantial delays requested by Respondent in the briefing of this summary decision motion as 

well as the timing of the oral argument on it, the Commission invites the parties to consider 

making a motion to reset deadlines in the underlying litigation. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Summary

Decision, filed April 7, 2022, is DENIED. 

By the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

SEAL: 

ISSUED: August 2, 2022 

2