alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7928 

To expand the payment of principal, interest, and fees for certain disaster 

loans under the CARES Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2020 

Mrs. FLETCHER (for herself and Mr. OLSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To expand the payment of principal, interest, and fees for 

certain disaster loans under the CARES Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Loan Interest Forgive5 ness for Taxpayers Under a Pandemic Act of 2020’’ or 

6 the ‘‘LIFT UP Act of 2020’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEBT RELIEF UNDER THE CARES ACT. 

8 Section 1112(a) of the CARES Act (Public Law 116– 

9 136) is amended— 

2 

•HR 7928 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(3) made during the period beginning on Jan7 uary 1, 2015, and ending on the day before the date 

8 of enactment of this paragraph— 

9 ‘‘(A) to a business concern under section 

10 7(b)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

11 636(b)(1)) that is unrelated to the COVID–19 

12 pandemic; or 

13 ‘‘(B) under section 7(b)(2) of the Small 

14 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(2)) that is un15 related to the COVID–19 pandemic.’’. 

Æ
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 09/22/2023 OSCAR NO 608615 | PAGE Page 1 of 3 * -PUBLIC 
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

In the Matter of Jeffrey Poole, Appellant, Docket No. D09417

STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING PURSUANT TO 16.C.F.R.§ 4.1

In connection with the Notice of Appearance filed on September 19, 2023, and 

pursuant to 16 C.F.R. § 4.1(d), I state that I am eligible to practice before the Commission 

as counsel for Jeffrey Poole. I am admitted to practice before the United States Courts 

of Appeals for the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits, the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida; and the Supreme Court of Florida (including all lower courts 

within the State of Florida). I am in good standing with the Florida Bar Association (Fla. 

Bar No. 310328).

As requested by 16 C.F.R. § 4.1(d), I further state that I am a member of good standing 

within the legal profession.

BEILLY & STROHSAHL, P.A.

Counsel for Jeffrey Poole

1144 S.E. 3rd Avenue

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33316

Telephone 954-763-7000

Facsimile 954-525-0404

/s/ Bradford J. Beilly________

Bradford J. Beilly

Fla. Bar No. 310328

brad@beillylaw.com

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 09/22/2023 OSCAR NO 608615 | PAGE Page 2 of 3 * -PUBLIC 
PUBLIC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 19, 2023, pursuant to Federal Trade 

Commission Rules of Practice 4.2(c) and 4.4(b), I caused the foregoing Notice of 

Appearance (FTC Form 232) and Declaration of Bradford J. Beilly to be filed and served 

as follows:

Honorable D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Office of Administrative Law Judges

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20580

Sent via e-mail to OALJ@ftc.gov and electronicfilings@ftc.gov

Bryan H. Beauman

Rebecca Price

Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney, PLLC

333 W. Vine St., Ste. 1500

Lexington, KY 40507

Telephone 859-255-8581

Fax: 859-231-0851

Sent via e-mail: bbeauman@sturgillturner.com and rprice@sturgillturner.com

 /s/ Bradford J. Beilly_______

Counsel for Jeffrey Poole

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 09/22/2023 OSCAR NO 608615 | PAGE Page 3 of 3 * -PUBLIC
#### Uriel G. ANGUIN, Appellant, v. W. L. TATUM, INC., Appellee.

No. 2354.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 29, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND UNAUDITED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         766,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,831,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,800
<INVENTORY>                                    810,747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,754,052
<PP&E>                                         756,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                 182,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,437,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,696,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,685
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,559,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,437,227
<SALES>                                     12,513,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,513,671
<CGS>                                        8,382,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,382,816
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,372,067
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              95,471
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                754,111
<INCOME-TAX>                                   201,644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            552,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   552,467
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
        23**
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
 
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
        Proginet Corporation on (i) Form
        S-8
        (File No. 3 33-71068)
        effective October 5, 2001, and
        (ii)
        Form S-8 (File No. 333-132944) effective April 3, 2006 ,
        of our
        report dated September 7, 2006, on the financial statements included in the
        Annual report of Proginet Corporation of Form 10-KSB as of and for the year
        ended July 31, 2006.
 
 
 
 BDO
        SEIDMAN, LLP
 
 
 Melville,
        New York
 September
        18, 2006
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7896 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the carbon capture 

credit to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the carbon oxide 

sequestration tax credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2020 

Mr. BERGMAN (for himself and Mrs. FLETCHER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

carbon capture credit to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the carbon oxide sequestration tax credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Redeeming Effective5 ness to Carbon Oxide Utilization Plus Sequestration Act 

6 of 2020’’ or ‘‘RECOUPS Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7896 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCED EFFICIENCY ELECTION FOR CARBON 

2 OXIDE SEQUESTRATION CREDIT. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 45Q(f) of the Internal 

4 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(8) EFFICIENCY ELECTION.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of any 

8 carbon capture equipment placed in service on 

9 or after the date of the enactment of the Bipar10 tisan Budget Act of 2018, a taxpayer that 

11 claims a carbon oxide sequestration credit for 

12 any taxable year may elect to treat the credit 

13 as a payment in excess of the tax imposed, or 

14 the estimated tax payment required, by subtitle 

15 A to the extent such credit exceeds the tax li16 ability of such taxpayer in such taxable year. 

17 ‘‘(B) LIMITATION.—If the taxpayer de18 scribed in subparagraph (A) makes an election 

19 under this paragraph (in such time and manner 

20 as the Secretary may prescribe by regulations), 

21 the dollar amounts applicable under paragraph 

22 (3) or (4) of subsection (a) shall be 90 percent 

23 of the applicable dollar amount determined 

24 under paragraph (1) of subsection (b).’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7896 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
SNODGRASS

Certified Public Accountants and Consultants

Exhibit 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary as of March 31, 2011, and the
related consolidated statements of income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We
conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making
inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our
review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 4, 2011 we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|Wheeling, West Virginia  
|May 13, 2011             

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
#### Vernon R. WILSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 23, 1969.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### E. B. PIRTLE, Georgia C. Pirtle, his wife, and B. E. Pirtle, Appellants, v. Denzel B. FORAKER, Sears Roebuck & Co., and United States of America, Appellees.

No. 70-886.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; William G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000794

23-SEP-2015

09:49 AM
(CROWN CENTRAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION LETTERHEAD)




                                   March 30, 2000



Mr. Jack Africk
1200 North Federal Highway
Suite 211
Boca Raton, FL 33431

Dear Jack:

The terms of the letter agreement dated October 28, 1993 under which you
serve as a consultant to the Company, in addition to serving on the Board and
Committees of the Board, provide for cancellation of the agreement by either
party at any time.

This letter confirms our mutual decision to terminate the consultancy agreement
effective at the close of business on April 28, 2000.  Please acknowledge your
concurrence by signing the duplicate copy of this letter in the space provided.

Personally, and on behalf of the Directors and Officers of Crown, thank you for
your many contributions as a consultant to the Company.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   /s/ Henry A. Rosenberg, Jr.
                                   Henry A. Rosenberg, Jr.





Acknowledged:


/s/ Jack Africk
---------------
Jack Africk
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors
Nutraceutix, Inc.
8340 - 154th Ave. NE
Redmond, Washington 98052

RE: Nutraceutix, Inc. Form S-8


        We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Nutraceutix, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 2001,
appearing on page F-2 of Nutraceutix, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2000.


GRANT THORNTON, LLP
Seattle, Washington

March 28, 2001.



                                       22
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 124TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 20th day of 

May, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ROBERT DARRELL TOLAR, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00228-CV; Trial Court No. 2010-1235-B

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

DARBIE D. TOLAR, SEAGRID ANN HOWE

AND TIA JO VANSCHOYCK, Appellees

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that all costs of this appeal are hereby adjudged against 

appellant, ROBERT DARRELL TOLAR, for which execution may issue, and that this 

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 31st day of July, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

March 5, 2013

Ms. Marie Huettner

State of Nebraska

Re: In the Matter of Equifax Information Services LLC, File No. 102 3252

Dear Ms. Huettner:

Thank you for your comment regarding the Federal Trade Commission’s consent

agreement in the above-entitled proceeding. The Commission has placed your comment on the

public record pursuant to rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. §

4.9(b)(6)(ii), and has given it serious consideration.

 The Commission is committed to protecting consumers in financial distress as well as

safeguarding consumer privacy and believes that the proposed order with Equifax Information

Services LLC will further this objective. 

 

 Having considered all of the facts of this case and all of the comments submitted in

response to the proposed order, the Commission has determined that the public interest

would best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without any modifications.

The final Decision and Order and other relevant materials are available from the Commission’s

website at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of

sources in its work. The Commission thanks you again for your comment.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Leibowitz and Commissioner Wright not

participating.

Richard C. Donohue

Acting Secretary
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-11034 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ABRAHAM PADILLA, a/k/a Bene Padilla, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:94-CR-339-R

- - - - - - - - - - November 14, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges:
PER CURIAM: * Abraham Padilla appeals his guilty-plea conviction to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marihuana. The district court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to grant Padilla’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. United States v. Bounds , 943 F.2d 541, 543 (5th Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 845 (1993). The civil forfeiture judgment against Padilla, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881,No. 95-11034 - 2 - and his subsequent conviction did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause. United States v. Ursery , 116 S. Ct. 2135, 2147-49 (1996). The district court did not clearly err in its calculation of the amount of marihuana attributable to Padilla,

see United States v. Angulo , 927 F.2d 202, 205 (5th Cir. 1991), and also did not clearly err by determining that Padilla was a leader or organizer. See United States v. Watson , 988 F.2d 544, 550 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1048 (1994).
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9

                       AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
                                12561 Perimeter
                              Dallas, Texas  75228
                                 (972) 960-9400

                                 June 22, 2001


AJW Partners, LLC
New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC
c/o The N.I.R. Group, LLC
155 First Street, Suite B
Mineola, New York 11501

     Re:  Airtech International Group, Inc. (the "Company") -
          Amendment of Securities Purchase Agreement and
          12% Secured Convertible Debentures
          ---------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This letter will set forth the agreement of the parties hereto to (i) amend
the provision of that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March
30, 2001 (the "Agreement") by and among the Company and the investors listed in
the signature page hereto (collectively, the "Investors") relating to the timing
of the subsequent investment to be made by the Investors pursuant the Agreement
and (ii) amend the provision of certain 12% Secured Convertible Debentures which
are convertible into the Company's common stock, par value $.05 per share
("Common Stock"), issued by the Company to the Investors on March 30, 2001 and
to be issued by the Company pursuant to the aforementioned subsequent
investment, respectively (collectively, the "Debentures") relating to the waiver
of certain limitations on ownership of the Company's Common Stock.

     By execution hereof, the parties agree that (i) Section 4(l) of the
Agreement relating to the subsequent investment to be made by the Investors
pursuant to the Agreement is hereby amended to delete the reference to "thirty
(30) business days" and replace such reference with "five (5) business days" and
(ii) Section 1.1 of the Debentures relating to, among other things, certain
limitations on the Investors' right to convert the Debentures into shares of
Common Stock, is hereby amended to extend the period of time required for the
Investors to waive such limitations from thirty (30) days to sixty-one (61)
days.  All other provisions of the Agreement and the Debentures shall remain in
full force and effect.
<PAGE>

     Please signify your agreement with the foregoing by signing a copy of this
letter where indicated and returning it to the undersigned.

                                    Sincerely,

                               AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

                                /s/ C.J. Comu
                               ---------------------------------------
                               C.J. Comu, Chairman and Chief Executive
                               Officer


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


AJW PARTNERS, LLC

By:  SMS GROUP, LLC, its Manager


By: /s/    Corey S. Ribotsky
   -----------------------------
     Corey S. Ribotsky
     Manager


NEW MILLENNIUM CAPITAL PARTNERS II, LLC

By:  FIRST STREET MANAGER II, LLC, its Manager


By:  /s/   Glenn A. Arbeitman
   -----------------------------
     Glenn A. Arbeitman
     Manager
**EXHIBIT10.26**

 

**SECONDAMENDMENT TO THE CONFIDENTIAL LICENSE AGREEMENT**

**FOR GAMEBOY, GAME BOY COLOR AND GAME BOY POCKET**

**HANDHELDVIDEO GAME SYSTEMS**

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (“Second Amendment”) amends that certainConfidential License Agreement for Nintendo Game Boy, Game Boy Color and GameBoy Pocket Handheld Video Game Systems dated March 9, 1999, and amended by theFirst Amendment dated March 8, 2002, between Nintendo of America Inc.(“Nintendo”) and THQ Inc. (“Licensee”) (“Original Agreement”).

 

RECITALS

 

The Original Agreement expired on March 8, 2004, and the parties desireto extend the Term of the Original Agreement for an additional two (2) years.

 

The definitions in the Original Agreement are incorporated by referenceinto this Second Amendment and shall be deemed to have the same meanings asthose ascribed to them in the Original Agreement unless otherwise set forthherein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

 

1.                                       Thedefinition of “Term” as set forth in Section 2.19 of the Original Agreement ishereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“‘Term’ shall meanseven (7) years from the Effective Date.”

 

2.                                       Allother terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall remain in full forceand effect.  This Second Amendment maybe signed in counterparts and by facsimile, which together shall constitute oneoriginal Second Amendment. This Second Amendment shall be effective as of March8, 2004.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this SecondAmendment.

 
| **NINTENDO:**            | **LICENSEE:** |
|--------------------------|---------------|
|                     |          |
| Nintendo of America Inc. | THQ Inc.      |
|                     |          |
| By:                      |          |   | By: |   |   |
|                     |          |   |   |
| Its:                     |          |   | Its: |   |   |
|                     |          |   |   |
| Date:                    |          |   | Date: |   |   |
|                          |               |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----