alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30618

 

RENOALD MUSE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden; RICHARD IEYOUB,

Attorney General, State of Louisiana,

Respondents-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-4030-C-6

---------------------

November 14, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The district court granted Renoald Muse, Louisiana inmate

#1222218, a certificate of appealability (COA) on one issue,

whether the 99-year prison sentence, without benefit of parole,

was proportional under the Eighth Amendment to the offense of

conviction. Even if the district court has the authority under

28 U.S.C. § 2253 to issue a COA, we conclude that the issue, in

light of the argument presented on appeal, is frivolous for

essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court in
No. 96-30618

- 2 -

** Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

denying relief. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

If this court were to hold that the district court lacks the

authority to grant a COA, the notice of appeal filed by Muse

would be construed as a request for the issuance of a COA on both

habeas claims presented in his habeas petition: 1) a Brady**

violation by the prosecution’s failure to disclose before trial

that one robbery victim failed to identify her assailant from a

photo array and 2) an Eighth Amendment violation premised on an

excessive sentence. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Because Muse

fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, see § 2253(c)(2), IT IS ORDERED that COA is

DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED. COA DENIED.
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph CLUSE.

No. 61575.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 5, 1978.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 5, 1978.

Richard B. Stricks, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Brian G. Meissner, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant is charged by bill of information with attempted crime against nature, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:27; 14:89. After *766a jury trial, he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to serve two months in the parish prison. On appeal to this Court, defendant relies upon twenty-five assignments of error for reversal of his conviction and sentence. Assignments of Error Nos. 3, 17, and 23A have been abandoned.

In Assignments of Error Nos. 4 and 23, defendant alleges that the trial court erred in: (1) limiting the voir dire examination of prospective jurors by imposing the restriction that questions could not be addressed to individual jurors; and (2) failing to have the jury charges written and a copy served on the defendant prior to reading them to the jury after a pre-trial request by defense counsel under Article 801, C.Cr.P.

Our examination of the record reveals that defendant neither objected to the court’s handling of the voir dire nor to the failure to furnish the requested written charges; he has, therefore, waived the right to complain of error, if any, on appeal. LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 841; *State v. Williams,*La., 343 So.2d 1026 (1977).

Our examination of the record shows the remaining assignments of error to be without merit.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

SUMMERS, J., concurs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,734
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    129,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           3,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,274
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,654
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         82,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                         1,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,654
<SALES>                                        125,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               127,265
<CGS>                                          105,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,088
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,038
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,038
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sven Ruder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 4, 2010

/s/ SVEN RUDER Sven Ruder President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             790
<SECURITIES>                                    15,759
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                       692
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,313
<PP&E>                                           4,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,453
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,677
<SALES>                                          3,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,785
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (17)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,071)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2022

No. 04-22-00407-CR

Michael HORNADAY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 11, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 637583

Honorable Michael Keasler, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On August 1, 2022, the court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in 

this appeal filed a notification of late record, stating that appellant had failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s record. On August 5, 2022, we ordered 

appellant to provide written proof to this court no later than August 15, 2022, that the reporter’s 

fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the reporter’s fee. We further ordered 

that if appellant failed to file written proof regarding the reporter’s fee within the time provided, 

appellant’s brief would be due on or before September 6, 2022. Despite our August 5, 2022 

order, appellant has failed to file any written proof regarding the reporter’s fee or appellant’s 

brief. 

On September 13, 2022, appellant’s attorney informed the clerk of this court that he 

planned to file a motion to dismiss this appeal on appellant’s behalf. However, as of this date, no 

such motion has been filed.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant’s attorney to file appellant’s brief or an appropriate 

response on or before October 7, 2022. If appellant’s attorney fails to file a brief or a response 

by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(b)(2). 
_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
#### John RILEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-83.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 1973.

William K. Jennings, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
No. 00-844.

#### Gibbs et al. *v.*Norton, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAKEEM WASHINGTON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2075

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 16, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, 

Judge.

Ita M. Neymotin and Stacy L. Sherman 

of Reginal Counsel, Second District, Fort 

Myers, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and William Stone, Jr., 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, C.J., KELLY, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)October 23, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)October 22, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn October 22, 2014, we announced that the board of directors of our general partner, ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., approved a cash distribution of 77.5 cents per unit for the third quarter 2014.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 8.01Other EventsOn October 22, 2014, the board of directors of our general partner, ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C., approved a cash distribution of 77.5 cents per unit for the third quarter 2014.  The third-quarter distribution is payable on November 14, 2014, to unitholders of record as of November 3, 2014.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated October 22, 2014.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:October 23, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer


3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated October 22, 2014.








4
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Forest Laboratories,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, Howard Solomon, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

            1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

/s/ Howard Solomon       Howard SolomonChairman of the Board,Chief Executive Officerand DirectorNovember 9, 2006
#### In re ESTATE of Harry C. KING, Deceased.

No. 72-1221.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 30, 1973.

Appeal from County Judge’s Court, Broward County; Leroy H. Moe, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Willie Edward DOZIER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-635.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 18, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 9, 1972.

Ronald Davis, Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellant.

*50Robert L. Shevm, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was tried by a jury on an indictment for rape. He was convicted, and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of ten years. ,On appeal therefrom the defendant contends that certain remarks made in final argument by the prosecutor constituted reversible error. We hold otherwise. Of the several remarks referred to, no objection was made except as to one. None were such as to require reversal regardless of objection. With regard to the remark to which objection was made, the objection was overruled, and we conclude no harmful error resulted. The facts relating to this rape incident need not be detailed. Commission of the crime by the defendant was fully proved. No reversible error having been made to appear the judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #15512 and #15513; INDIANA Disaster Number IN-00062]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Indiana (FEMA-4363-DR), dated 05/05/2018.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/14/2018 through 03/04/2018.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 06/05/2018.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/05/2018.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         02/05/2019.                    

# ADDRESSES:

 Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Indiana, dated 05/05/2018, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Dearborn, Fulton, Jasper, Kosciusko, La Porte, Ohio, Porter, Pulaski, Spencer, Starke, Switzerland, Vanderburgh, White                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Indiana: Benton, Dubois, Franklin, Gibson, Miami, Perry, Posey, Wabash, Warrick, Whitley

Kentucky: Boone, Daviess, Gallatin, Hancock, Henderson

Ohio: Butler, Hamilton

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2018-12965 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT (3)(b)(5)
                        AMENDMENT TO
                     RESTATED BYLAWS OF
                FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC.


      The  Restated Bylaws of Florida Rock Industries, Inc.,
be,  and  hereby are, amended to delete the existing Section
1. of Article II, entitled "Annual Meeting," in its entirety
and  replace  it with the following new Article II,  Section
1.:

      Section 1.     Annual Meeting.     The annual  meeting
of  the  stockholders  shall be held  on  any  business  day
selected by the Board of Directors in the second quarter  of
the  Corporation's fiscal year, for the purpose of  electing
directors and for the transaction of such other business  as
may  come  before the meeting.  If the election of directors
shall  not  be  held on the day designated  herein  for  any
annual  meeting  of  stockholders,  or  at  any  adjournment
thereof, the Board of Directors shall cause the election  to
be  held  at a special meeting of the stockholders  as  soon
thereafter as conveniently may be.


<PAGE>
### U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Pesticide Programs Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P) 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20460 

## NOTICE OF PESTICIDE REGISTRATION 

## X Reg istration Reregistration (under FIFRA. as amended) 

### Name and

**Addre~s** 

### of Registrant (include ZIP Code) : 

## Northwest Agricultural Products 821 South Chestnut Ave. Pasco WA 99301 EPA Reg. Number: 

## 71975-3

Term of Issuance : Name of Pesticide Product: Date of Issuance : 

## August 29 , 2014



# Uncond itional


# Fluorescens Technical

Note: Changes in labeling differing in substance from that accepted i n connection with this registrati on must be submitted to and accepted by the Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division prior to use of the label in commerce. In any correspondence on this product always refer to the above EPA registration number. On the basis of information furnished by the registrant. the above named pesticide is hereby registered under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act. Registration is i n no way to be construed as an endorsement or recommendation of this product by the Agency. In order to protect health and the environment, the Administrator. on his or her motion, may at any time suspend or cancel the registration of a pesticide in accordance with the Act. The acceptance of any ·name in connection with the registration of a product under th is Act is not to be construed as giving the registrant a right to exclusive use of the name or to its use if it has been covered by others. 

## This registration does no't eliminate the need for continual reassessment of the pesticide

. If EPA determines at any time, that additional data are required to maintain in effect an existing reg istration, the Agency will requ ire submission of such data under section 3(c)(2)(B) of FIFRA. Th is product is unconditionally registered in accordance with FIFRA section 3(c)(5) and is subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Revise the EPA Registration number on the label to read , " EPA Reg. No

. 71975-3." 2
. Subm it two (2) copies of the revised final printed labeling before you release the product for shipment A stamped copy of the label is enclosed for your records

. 

# "'M'"'. "
....... """"'((_

# rtrJr:J& ) Date: 

## August 29, 2014 Robert McNally, Director 

# 1 Bio pesticides and Pollution Prevention Division \7511 P)

EPA Form 8570-6