alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
October 29, 2019

Agenda

8:00-9:00 am Registration

Enter at 7th and D Street, SW and proceed through airport-style security

9:00-9:10 am Opening 

James Kohm, Associate Director

Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC

Welcome 

Laura Koss, Assistant Director

Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC 

9:10-9:35 am FTC Class Action Consumer Research

Shiva Koohi, Economist, Bureau of Economics, FTC

9:35-10:35 am Panel 1: Current Practices - Problems and Opportunities in Reaching 

Consumers

Moderator: Robin Moore, FTC

Panelists:

Cameron Azari, Epiq

Elizabeth Cabraser, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP

Beth Chun, Office of the Attorney General of Texas

Hon. Jacqueline Corley, Northern District of California 

Todd Hilsee, The Hilsee Group LLC

Brian Perryman, Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Hassan Zavareei, Tycko & Zavareei LLP 

10:35-10:50 am Break

10:50-11:50 am Panel 2: Researching the Past and Predicting the Future
Moderator: Hampton Newsome, FTC

Panelists:

Nicole Christ, FTC

Brian Fitzpatrick, Vanderbilt University Law School

Alison Frankel, Reuters

Shiva Koohi, FTC

David Siffert, Center on Civil Justice at NYU School of Law

Richard Simmons, Analytics Consulting LLC

Shannon Wheatman, Kinsella Media

11:50 am-12:45 pm Panel 3: Looking Ahead – Challenges and Opportunities For

Increasing Consumer Recovery Rates

Moderator: Robin Moore, FTC

Panelists:

Elizabeth Cabraser, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP

Beth Chun, Office of the Attorney General of Texas

Hon. Jacqueline Corley, Northern District of California 

Brian Fitzpatrick, Vanderbilt University Law School

Matt Garretson, Signal Interactive Media

Amanda Rose, Vanderbilt University Law School

Shannon Wheatman, Kinsella Media

12:45-12:55 pm Closing Remarks
Exhibit 31.1



Certification



I, Francie P. Reppy, certify that:



I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc.;



Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and
have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors:



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



Date: May 12, 2004



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Francie P. Reppy                             
|Francie P. Reppy                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                    



31
#### Henry DIAZ, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Bertha PAYTON, wife of/and Lovell Payton v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC. Mrs. Lottie SHAVERS, wife of/and Robert Shavers v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC.

Nos. 5557, 5558.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 2, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 30, 1973.

Writ Refused Jan. 25, 1974.

*345Robert T. Hughes, Garrett, Carl & Roussel, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appel-lees Payton.

Harry J. Wheeler, Von Hoene, Becker & Garner, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-ap-pellees Shavers.

A. R. Christovich, Jr., C. B. Ogden, II, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before REDMANN, SCHOTT and BAILES, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Defendant in these consolidated suits appeals from a judgment which awarded personal injury damages to two paying passengers on defendant’s public bus. Defendant addresses its appeal only to liability.

The bus had stopped, to let passengers on and off, in the parking lane of a multi-lane street, about 12' to IS' from its intersection with another multi-lane street with a wide neutral ground.

Before the driver began to move, he saw in the rear-view mirror an automobile in the adjacent lane (the farthest right of three traffic lanes) about 50' to the rear of the *4(Y*bus. The driver did not wait for the approaching car to pass in order then to move into the traffic lane but began to drive ahead in the parking lane.

The driver testifies that the car gave no signal for a turn, not even when, as the bus reached the curb of the intersecting street, the car was approximately at the rear of the bus. But as the bus continued into the intersecting street (still in the projection of the parking lane), the car made a right turn in front of the bus, causing the driver to apply his- brakes forcefully. Plaintiffs was injured when thrown forward.

Alphonse v. New Orleans Pub. Serv. Inc., 138 So.2d 610 (La.App.1962), on facts not fairly distinguishable from ours, held the bus company not liable. Defendant relies on *Alphonse.*

We note that the New Orleans City Code, § 38-91, (M.C.S.Ord.No.3816, § 1, of June 6, 1968), now provides “When parking is permitted in a lane of traffic immediately adjacent to the curb, no vehicle shall travel in such lane of traffic except for the purpose of stopping or parking, or for the purpose of making a turn, and when making a turn, only within fifty feet (50') from the intersection where the turn is to be made.”

*Alphonse*obviously could not construe the .1968 ordinance, does not mention any earlier, similar ordinance, and must therefore be considered as inapplicable.

The obligation of the bus driver here was to move immediately into the moving traffic lane. Under the circumstances he would have had to wait for the approaching car to pass. His driving in the parking lane could only be legally done if he intended to make a right turn himself. Without exculpating the other driver, we agree with the district judge that defendant’s fault in driving in a parking lane contributed to causing the accident.

The judgments are affirmed.
Exhibit  32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                     RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the annual report of Rick's Cabaret International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB  for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Eric  S. Langan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: January 5, 2006                         By:  /s/ Eric S. Langan
                                                   ------------------
                                              Eric S. Langan
                                              Chief Financial Officer
263 La. 365

#### George A. ADROUNY et al. v. INTERNATIONAL CITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY et al.

No. 52937.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1972.

In re: George A. Adrouny, et al. applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 266 So.2d 524.

Application denied. We find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

HAMLIN, J.,

is of the opinion that the application should be granted. See C.C.P. Art. 5051.

SANDERS, J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted, being of the opinion that a cause of action is stated justifying a trial on the merits.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7997 

To allow individuals to mitigate the financial impact of COVID–19 by taking 

a one-time distribution of flexible spending arrangement funds in certain 

plan years, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 11, 2020 

Mrs. AXNE (for herself and Mr. BALDERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To allow individuals to mitigate the financial impact of 

COVID–19 by taking a one-time distribution of flexible 

spending arrangement funds in certain plan years, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Health and 

5 Dependent Care Flexible Spending Account Distribution 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7997 IH

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL DISPOSITION RULES FOR UNUSED BENE2 FITS IN FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGE3 MENTS OF INDIVIDUALS IN DURING CERTAIN 

4 PLAN YEARS. 

5 (a) FSAS MAY ALLOW QUALIFIED DISTRIBUTION.— 

6 For purposes of sections 106, 125, and 129 of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986, a flexible spending arrangement 

8 may allow a qualified distribution. 

9 (b) TAXES APPLIED TO CERTAIN DISTRIBUTIONS.— 

10 For purposes of sections 125(a) and 129(a) of such Code, 

11 such sections shall not apply to any benefit distributed 

12 under subsection (a) from a flexible spending arrangement 

13 for a use other than the qualifying benefit for which such 

14 arrangement was established. 

15 (c) SPECIAL RULE FOR DISPOSITION OF UNUSED

16 BENEFITS.—For purposes of such Code, a plan shall not 

17 fail to be treated as a cafeteria plan, health flexible spend18 ing arrangement, or dependent care flexible spending ar19 rangement merely because such arrangement provides for 

20 a qualified distribution. 

21 (d) QUALIFIED DISTRIBUTION.—For purposes of this 

22 section, the term ‘‘qualified distribution’’ means a one23 time distribution in a qualifying plan year to an individual 

24 of all or a portion of the balance in the employee’s account 

25 under a cafeteria plan, health flexible spending arrange26 ment, or dependent care flexible spending arrangement. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7997 IH

1 (e) QUALIFYING PLAN YEAR.—The term ‘‘qualifying 

2 plan year’’ means plan year 2020, plan year 2021, and 

3 any plan year that falls during a calendar year in which 

4 a national emergency is declared by the President under 

5 the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) 

6 with respect to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID– 

7 19). 

8 (f) GUIDANCE.—The Secretary of the Treasury (or 

9 the Secretary’s delegate) shall issue guidance with respect 

10 to the interaction between a qualified distribution under 

11 subsection (a) and the nondiscrimination testing provi12 sions of section 125 of such Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 12(b)

		     FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
			COMPUTATION OF RATIOS



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
											       Six Months Ended
												 June 30, 1999
											       -----------------
											     (Millions of Dollars)


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<S>                                                                                                 <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................         $ 275
  Income taxes ............................................................................           151
  Fixed charges, as below .................................................................            92

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................         $ 518

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ........................................................................         $  86
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................             2
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................             4

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................         $  92

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................................          5.63




RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................         $ 275
  Income taxes ............................................................................           151
  Fixed charges, as below .................................................................            92

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................         $ 518

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ........................................................................         $  86
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................             2
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................             4

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................            92

Non-tax deductible preferred stock dividends ..............................................             7
Ratio of income before income taxes to net income .........................................          1.55

Preferred stock dividends before income taxes .............................................            11

Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends ......................................         $ 103

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends .................          5.03
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 716 Introduced in House (IH)]

103d CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 716

To amend title 31, United States Code, to establish an interest penalty 
for failure to make prompt payments under service contracts with small 
                           business concerns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 1992

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Government Operations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 31, United States Code, to establish an interest penalty 
for failure to make prompt payments under service contracts with small 
                           business concerns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INTEREST PENALTY FOR FAILURE TO MAKE PROMPT PAYMENTS UNDER 
              SERVICE CONTRACTS WITH SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3902(a) of title 31, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)'';
            (2) in paragraph (1) (as designated by paragraph (1) of 
        this section) by inserting ``and subject to paragraph (2)'' 
        after ``this title''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2)(A) In the case of a failure to make any payment due under a 
service contract with a small business concern by the payment due date, 
the interest penalty under this subsection shall be paid without regard 
to whether the small business concern is obligated under the contract 
to provide an item of property or service after the required payment 
date.
    ``(B) In this paragraph--
            ``(i) the term `service contract' means a contract--
                    ``(I) the primary purpose of which is the provision 
                of a service to the Federal Government; and
                    ``(II) that does not require providing property to 
                the Federal Government, other than such items as are 
                necessary for the performance of such service; and
            ``(ii) the term `small business concern' has the meaning 
        that term has under section 3(a) of the Small Business Act.''.
    (b) Regulations.--The Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget shall issue regulations implementing the amendment made by 
subsection (a) by not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of SCOLR Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard M. Levy,
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President—Finance of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/    RICHARD M. LEVYRichard
      M. LevyChief
      Financial Officer and
              Vice
      President—FinanceSCOLR
      Pharma, Inc.




Date:
March 9, 2009
----

|   |  Exhibit      32.02 |
|--------|--------------------------|

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Jose I.      Ortega                                          |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jose I.    Ortega                                                |   |
| Vice President –      Finance,Chief Financial      Officer |   |
|                                                             |   |
| July      25, 2008                                               |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              73
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,132)
<INVENTORY>                                     95,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               175,024
<PP&E>                                         304,883
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 534,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,208
<BONDS>                                        239,245
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   534,961
<SALES>                                        327,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               327,908
<CGS>                                          285,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  285,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,267
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,907
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>
#### Lydia V. KING, Appellant, v. Charles J. KING, Appellee.

No. 72-1131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 12, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart F. LaMotte, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.