alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S AT WI ND E RS I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70337 A ge nc yN o. A 071- 768- 170 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S a tw i nde rS i ngh, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen e xc l us i on pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. R e vi e w i ng f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , M

a ltyv . A s h c r o

ft , 3 8 1 F . 3 d9 4 2 , 9 4 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) , we



# FI LED JU N 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 70337 2 d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng S i ng h’ s m ot i on t o reopen be c aus e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d m or e than tw o y e ar s a f t e rthe B I A ’ s M ay4, 2005, o r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , an dS in g h f a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te m a te r ia lly c hange d c i r c um s t anc e s i n I ndi at o qua l i f yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the f i l i ng d e a d lin e , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; s e e a ls o M a lty , 381 F . 3d a t945 ( “ T he c r itic a l qu e s tio n is . . . w h e th e rc ir c u m s tan c e s h av e c h an g e ds u f f ic ie n tlyth a t a p et i t i o n er w h o p rev i o u sl y d i dn o th av e a l eg i t i m at e cl ai m fo r asyl u m n o w h as a w e ll- f o u n d e df e aro f f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n .” ) . S i ng h’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Jane Arnold, Respondent, *v.*Bloom & Krup, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 29, 1953.

*638
      *Samuel B. Hurwitz*for appellant.

*Joseph V. Matatia*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The rescission judgment entered below is reversed on the grounds that plaintiff did not comply with the provisions of section 150 of the Personal Property Law and on the further ground of waiver of all warranties. (See Personal Property Law, § 152, and *Lumbrazo*v. *Woodruff,*256 N. Y. 92.) The case of *Horowitz*v. *Bursens*(198 Misc. 399) is distinguishable on the facts.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Eder and Hecht, JJ., concur; Hammer, J., dissents and votes for affirmance.

Judgment reversed, etc.
#### Luis HERNANDEZ v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC.

No. 60188.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Luis Hernandez applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 346 So.2d 304.

Writ denied. There is no merit in the single assignment urged.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted for reasons stated by the dissenting judge in the court of appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 777 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 777

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 
U.S.C. 40701) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``including'' and 
                inserting ``prioritizing, to the extent practicable 
                consistent with public safety considerations''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (8), by striking ``including'' and 
                inserting ``in particular,'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) provide assurances that the DNA section of the 
        laboratory to be used to conduct DNA analyses has a written 
        policy that prioritizes the analysis of, to the extent 
        practicable consistent with public safety considerations, 
        samples from homicides and sexual assaults.'';
            (3) in subsection (c)(3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``2014 through 
                2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2024''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``2014 through 
                2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2024''; and
            (4) in subsection (j), by striking ``2015 through 2019'' 
        and inserting ``2019 through 2024''.

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION.

    Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (34 
U.S.C. 40722(b)) is amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2019 through 2024''.

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS.

    Section 304(d) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (34 
U.S.C. 40723(d)) is amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2019 through 2024''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 5, 2017














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of August 31, 2017 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$15,088Sub-advised funds1,379Institutional accounts4,486Total$20,953





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,548Small-Mid Cap3,387Mid Cap115Large Cap9,810All Cap Select383Long-Short4,922Corporate bonds678Core fixed income316(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(206)Total$20,953








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:September 5, 2017By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                           Exhibit 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Robert S. Hillas and Mark J. Maten, or either of
them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, to do any and all acts, including the
execution of documents, which said attorneys, or either of them, may deem
necessary or advisable to enable Envirogen, Inc. (the "Company") to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations
and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with
the filing under such Act of an annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998, including the power and authority to sign in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities in which
the signature of the undersigned would be appropriate, such annual report and
any and all amendments thereto and generally to do and perform all things
necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as
the undersigned could do if personally present.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereto set his or her hand this
26th day of March, 1999.



 
                                         /s/ Robert C. Miller
                                         -----------------------              
                                            Robert C. Miller

                                      62
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Daniel W. Rumsey, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of P-Com, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

         3. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financing reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the  registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 3, 2003

/s/ Daniel W. Rumsey
--------------------
Interim Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 121 (Friday, June 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 29126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Source Selection Meeting for NIAID 
IRF at Fort Detrick.
    Date: July 3, 2018.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dharmendar Rathore, Ph.D., Senior Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, Room 3G30, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 
Fishers Lane, MSC 9834, Bethesda, MD 20892-9834, 240-669-5058, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cab8abbea2a5b8afae8aa7aba3a6e4a4a3a2e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aad8cbdec2c5d8cfceeac7cbc3c684c4c3c284cdc5dc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the intramural research review cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 19, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-13415 Filed 6-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### George GREGOIRE, Appellant, v. Carl POLLOCK and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 70-670.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") by Azzurra Holding Corporation ("Registrant"), and the undersigned hereby certifies that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report.





Date: April 11, 2011
By:
/s/  Daniel W. RumseyDaniel W. Rumsey

Chief Executive Officer

and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to Azzurra Holding Corporation and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No . FAA

- 20 16

- 3343 Directorate ID : 2015

- SW

- 078

- AD Helicopter Model:

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): XXX Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason : The actions of this proposed AD are in tended to prevent failure of the sliding door star support attachment, which could inhibit the operation of the sliding door from the inside, delaying the evacuation of passengers during an emergency.

Costs : We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 261 helicopters of U.S. Registry and that
labor costs average $85 a work hour

. Based on these estimates, we expect the following

costs:
• Visually inspecting the control rod end fittings would require 1 work

- hour and a

minimal amount for consumable materi als for an estimated cost of $85 per helicopter, or

$2 2 ,1 85 for the U.S. fleet.

• Replacing the control rod end fittings with airworthy fittings would require 5 work

hours for a labor cost of $425. Parts w ould cost about $242 for an estimated total cost of

$667 per helicopter.

• Dye

- penetrant inspecting the star support pin for a crack would require 2 work

- hours

and no parts for an estimated cost of $170 per helicopter and $44,370 for the U.S. fleet

. • Replacing the star support pin would require 5 work

- hou rs. Parts w ould cost about $200

for an estimated total cost of $625 per helicopter.

• Installing three carbon fabric plies to reinforce the sliding door star support would

require 5 work

- hours. Parts w ould cost $200 for an estimated total cost of $625 per
helicopter and $163,125 for the U.S. fleet.2

Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  )

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  )

Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer : David Hatfield
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson 

Alvaro M. Bedoya 

In the Matter of 

HomeAdvisor, Inc., a corporation, 

d/b/a Angi Leads, DOCKET NO. 9407 

d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered by Angi. 

ORDER GRANTING COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S EXPEDITED 

MOTION TO CONTINUE EVIDENTIARY HEARING DATE 

AND PREHEARING DEADLINES 

On September 14, 2022, Complaint Counsel filed an expedited motion asking the 

Commission to continue the evidentiary hearing, currently set to begin on November 9, 2022, by 

three months. Complaint Counsel also seek a corresponding extension of all prehearing 

deadlines that have not already passed. Complaint Counsel assert that good cause exists for the 

continuance because of delays in the discovery process, including Respondent’s alleged failure 

to timely produce the recordings of sales calls, and Respondent’s requests for various extensions 

in the litigation. A motion for sanctions concerning production of the sales calls is currently 

pending before the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Respondent states that it disputes the 

substance of Complaint Counsel’s continuance motion and its characterization of the events 

allegedly necessitating an extension, but Respondent does not oppose the request for a 

continuance. 

Commission Rule 3.41(b) provides that “[t]he Commission, upon a showing of good 

cause, may order a later date for the evidentiary hearing to commence.” 16 C.F.R. § 3.41(b). In 

our August 2, 2022 Order Denying Summary Decision, we invited the parties to consider moving 

to reset litigation deadlines because of substantial delays requested by Respondent in the briefing 

of Complaint Counsel’s motion for summary decision and the timing of the related oral 

argument. In light of those and other delays as well as the parties’ ongoing discovery dispute, 

we find good cause to reschedule the hearing and to extend prehearing deadlines. Accordingly, 

1 
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Complaint Counsel’s Expedited Motion to 

Continue Evidentiary Hearing Date and Prehearing Deadlines is GRANTED; 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the evidentiary hearing in this proceeding shall 

commence at 10:00 a.m. on February 22, 2023; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT unless modified by the Chief Administrative 

Law Judge, all related prehearing deadlines shall be extended by three months. 

By the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

SEAL: 

ISSUED: September 19, 2022 

2
#### John David PRESLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39595.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 16, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 232 So.2d 776.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.