alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8093 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8093

To adjust the boundary of Big Bend National Park in the State of Texas, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 22, 2020

Mr. Hurd of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To adjust the boundary of Big Bend National Park in the State of Texas, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Big Bend National Park Boundary 
Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Map.--The term ``map'' entitled ``Big Bend National 
        Park, Proposed Boundary Adjustment'', numbered 155/167,296, and 
        dated July 2020.
            (2) Park.--The term ``Park'' means the Big Bend National 
        Park, as established pursuant to the Act of June 20, 1935 (49 
        Stat. 393; 16 U.S.C. 156).
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) Land Acquisition.--The Secretary is authorized to acquire 
approximately 6,100 acres of lands or interests in land generally 
depicted on the map as ``Proposed Park Addition'' by donation, purchase 
from willing sellers, or exchange.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The map shall be on file and available 
for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 
Service, the Department of the Interior.
    (c) Boundary Revision and Administration.--Upon the acquisition of 
any lands or interests in land pursuant to subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall revise the boundary of the Park to include the 
acquisition, and shall administer such lands or interests in land as 
part of the Park in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and the statement of operations attached as an exhibit to the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            8,497
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  8,497
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,497
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           100,186
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                         24,389
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                    4,949,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,497
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    78,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               12,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (91,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (91,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (91,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.04)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report  dated  August 27, 2002,  accompanying  the  financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Proginet  Corporation on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002. We hereby consent to the  incorporation
by  reference  of  said  report  in  the  Registration   Statement  of  Proginet
Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-71068) effective October 5, 2001.



GRANT THORNTON LLP


Melville, New York
October 1, 2003


                                       37
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,764,530
<SECURITIES>                                 2,641,647
<RECEIVABLES>                                  645,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    870,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,453,740
<PP&E>                                         898,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 873,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,570,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          660,707
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,336
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,516,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,570,590
<SALES>                                      3,441,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,444,822
<CGS>                                        1,554,980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,410,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (91,423)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,125,775
<INCOME-TAX>                                   433,318
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            692,457
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      177,807
<NET-INCOME>                                   870,264
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from SEC Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended January 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
              
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                       421
<INVENTORY>                                     26,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,971
<PP&E>                                          27,826
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,262
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,434 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,965
<SALES>                                         34,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,595
<CGS>                                           24,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,864
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,864
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Leisure Corporation, a Minnesota
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Daniel G. Brandano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Daniel G. Brandano
----------------------
Daniel G. Brandano
Chief Executive Officer

April 2, 2007

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Dynamic Leisure Corporation and will be retained by Dynamic Leisure
Corporation and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.3

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Joseph A. Santangelo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         3. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orleans Homebuilders, Inc.
(the "Company" for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

         4. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:    November 14, 2003



                                                    /s/ Joseph A. Santangelo
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Joseph A. Santangelo
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8592

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS G. RUTHERS, II,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior

District Judge. (CR-88-62-K, CA-95-157)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas G. Ruthers, II, Appellant Pro Se. William David Wilmoth,

United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Ruthers, No. CR-88-62-K; CA-95-157 (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 6, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|Exhibit 31(d)                                                                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification                                                             
|I, Moray P. Dewhurst, Chief Financial Officer of Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), certify that:
|1.                                                                                                 
|2.                                                                                                 
|3.                                                                                                 
|4.                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|5.                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|Date:   May 3, 2004                                                                                
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|                                                                                                   
|
#### In re Mr. and Mrs. Henry MARTIN applying for the Adoption of the minor Lance Joseph LeBoeuf v. Floyd Joseph LeBOEUF.

No. 60964.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 1977.

Ralph D. Hillman, Thibodaux, for defendant-appellant.

Michael J. Scurto, Houma, for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Henry Martin, seek to appeal from an adverse judgment on their petition for an interlocutory decree of adoption. At petitioners’ request, the district court, relying upon La. *1203R.S. 9:438, granted the appeal, returnable to this Court. However, that portion of R.S. 9:438 which states that appeals in adoption proceedings shall lie to the supreme court is in conflict with the constitutional provisions setting forth our appellate jurisdiction in civil cases. Under the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, our appellate jurisdiction does not extend to such matters, which are instead appealable to the courts of appeal. La.Const.1974, art. 5, §§ 5(D), 10. See also, La.R.S. 13:1591. In light of the constitutional revision of appellate jurisdiction effected subsequent to the enactment of La.R.S. 9:438, we find that the statute, to the extent that it conflicts with the constitution, had been impliedly repealed.

We conclude that the present proceeding is one over which we have no appellate jurisdiction and therefore it must be transferred to the proper court of appeal. See, La.R.S. 13:4441,13:4442; La.C.C.P. art. 2162. It is ordered that this appeal be transferred to the First Circuit Court of Appeal, costs of the transfer to be paid by petitioners and all future costs to await final disposition of the case.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (333-01574), (333-12789) and (333-24581); Form S-3
(333-10383) and (333-14025); and on Form S-4 (333-13133) of our report dated
March 6, 1996 appearing in the U.S. Office Products Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended April 26, 1997.
 
                                          HERTZ, HERSON & COMPANY, LLP
 
New York, New York
July 1, 1997
PDNo.

IN THE COURT

OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS

AT AUSTIN

INIUBONG EBONG, Petitioner

THE STATE OF TEXAS

COURT OF CRPINA! A5*r *» <i

MAY 12 2015

Abel Acosta, Glei*

FILED IN

OURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

MAY 12 2015

Aoei Acosta, Clerk

On Petition for Discretionary Review ofthe Fourteenth Court of Appeals,

Cause No. 14-14-00070-CR, Affirming Judgment and Sentence of Trial Court Number:

1374974 in the 351st Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.

PETITIONER EBONG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ONLY ORIGINAL

COPY OF HIS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Iniubong Ebong, TDCJ-CID#01908828, your Petitioner,

proceeding in pro se, in the above-styled and yet to be numbered cause, respectfully moves

this Honorable Court to grant leave to file the original copy only of his Petition for

Discretionary Review. In support thereof, Petitioner would show the Court as follows:

I.

1. The style and appeal number of his appeal Iniubong Ebong v. State of

Texas, No. 14-14-00070-CR affirmed on April 09, 2015, in the Fourteenth

Court of Appeals.

2. The Petitioner moves the Court, pursuant to Rule 2, Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, to suspend Rule 9.3(b), of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure, which requires the filing of eleven (11) copies of the

PDR with the Court.

The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request is as follows: The

Petitioner is indigent, incarcerated and does not have access to a

photocopier for reproduction of the requite copies of the opinion for the

Fourth Court of Appeals affirming his judgment and sentence. The

Appellant is presently not represented by counsel and will be filing apro se

Petition for Discretionary Review.

Accordingly, the Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant

leave to file an original copy only of his Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court.

SIGNED on this the 6th day ofMay 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

Petitioner, Pro se

[908828

Poluns^fy Unit

3872 FM 350 South

Livingston, Texas 77351-8580
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Iniubong Ebong, TDCJ-CID#01908828, Petitioner, pro se, herein certify that a

true and correct copy of this instrument was sent to the Office of the Criminal District

Attorney for Harris County, Texas and to the Office of the State Prosecuting Attorney, by

placing same, in a U.S. mail box, first-class, postage paid, on this the 6th day of May,

2015.
Addendum to Amended and Restated Operating Agreement


*    The  addendum  consists  of a schedule  of pricing  terms to the  Operating
     Agreement. The schedule constitutes confidential information which has been
     omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0120 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-056-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: CF-2013-06

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Patricia L. Moss                       |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Patricia      L. Moss                      |   |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                       |   |
| /s/ Gregory D. Newton                      |   |
| Gregory      D. Newton                     |   |
| Executive      Vice President and          |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer               |   |

| Dated:  | August 20, 2010 |   |
|--------------|-----------------|--------|

----
#### Clyde Henry WHEELER, a/k/a Tom Post, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 13, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.