alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60910

Summary Calendar

CHARLES STEPHENS,

Petitioner

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A038 541 554

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Stephens is a native of Guyana and citizen of the United 

Kingdom who was ordered removed based on his commission of an aggravated 

felony. He petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying as untimely his motion to reconsider or 

reopen. He argues that the BIA erred by concluding that he was not entitled 

to equitable tolling. He further argues that his prior counsel rendered 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60910 Document: 00513938174 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/04/2017
No. 15-60910

2

ineffective assistance by not arguing that his offense did not involve more than 

$10,000 because there is no indication that the district court made such a 

finding. The record undermines this assertion, as it shows that the district 

court adopted the presentence report, which found that the offense involved 

more than $10,000. 

Because Stephens was ordered removed based on his commission of an 

aggravated felony, and because his arguments concerning equitable tolling and

ineffective assistance of counsel do not present substantial constitutional 

claims, we lack jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), (D); Assaad v. 

Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 471, 474-76 (5th Cir. 2004). The petition is, therefore,

DISMISSED. 

 

 Case: 15-60910 Document: 00513938174 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/04/2017
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q the quarter ending October 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I StuartI. Greenwald, Treasurer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Stuart I. GreenwaldStuart I. GreenwaldTreasurer

Date: December 15, 2004
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)December 21, 2015(Date of earliest event reported)December 21, 2015





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn December 21, 2015, we and ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) announced our 2016 financial guidance.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated December 21, 2015.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:December 21, 2015By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated December 21, 2015.








4
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                FORM 8-K/A (NO.2)

              Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED) JUNE 02, 2008

                     ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC
               (EXACT NAME OF COMPANY AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

FLORIDA                                000-30932                   13-4172059
-------                                ---------                   ----------
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION)    (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)       (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION)                                                IDENTIFICATION)


              335 CONNIE CRESCENT, CONCORD, ONTARIO, CANADA L4K 5R2

               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (905) 695-4142

                                       N/A

          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



|_| Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities
Act (17 CFR 230.425)

|_| Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange
Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 40.13e-4(c))








<PAGE>


ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT

Effective August 20, 2008 the Issuer (the "Company") completed a draw down of
the sum of $150,000 under it's previously reported Credit Facility Agreement
("Facility" or "Agreement") with Mr. Bengt Odner a director and shareholder of
the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company requested a draw down under
the Facility of $150,000 for general working capital purposes. The draw down
under the facility was approved and provided by Mr. Odner.

With the completion of the most recent draw down under the Facility; a total of
$950,000 has been drawn down under the Facility and received by the Company for
use for general working capital. The sums received by the Company in connection
with the draw downs are represented by 9% unsecured subordinated demand
promissory notes issued by the Company pursuant to the Facility.


 ITEM 2.03 CREATION OF A DIRECT FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR AN OBLIGATION UNDER AN
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENT OF A REGISTRANT

See Item 1.01 above.




                                         ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE INC.

Date: August 25, 2008
                                         By: /s/ David J. Johnson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                              David J. Johnson Chief Executive
                                              Officer and President
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO. 09-17-00494-CV



### ____________________ ULFCAR PRODUCTION APS, Appellant

V.
FLOWCRETE NORTH AMERICA, IN C., RPM INTERNATIONAL, INC., FLOWCRETE GROUP LIMITED, FL OWCRETE UK, LTD, MARK GREAVES AND GRANT ADAMSON, Appellees

________________ __________________ __________________ ___ ______________ On Appeal from the 410th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 16-05-05576-CV

________________ __________________ ______________________ _____________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
The appellant, Ulfcar Production ApS, filed a motion to dismiss this
accelerated appeal. The motion is voluntar ily made by the appellant prior to any

decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed a notice
of appeal. We grant the moti on and dismiss the appeal.2 APPEAL DISMISSED.

_______ _________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN Chief Justice
Submitted on February 28, 2018 Opinion Delivered March 1, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kr eger and Johnson, JJ.
May 19, 2011 

Sgt. J. Matt Tarczynski 

Pennsylvania State Police 

Aviation Patrol Unit 3 

575 Airport Drive 

New Cumberland, PA 17070 

Dear Sgt. Tarczynski: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 43.3 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t process 

your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request: 

The FAA has reviewed your petition for exemption from § 43.3 and are unable to process 

your request any further. For the FAA to further consider your petition, please provide the 

following information: 

 What specific operation you will be performing when using this relief if granted. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety as least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request 

What You Should Do: 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You: 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft 

 and Airport Rules Division
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence FIRVEN.

No. 62092.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 24, 1978.

In re: Clarence Firven applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Jefferson Parish.

Writ granted. Bond reinstated; defendant released on bond pending trial; surety should be notified that bond reinstated.
INVESTOR PRESENTATION
 
 Safe Harbor Statement
  
 
 DELIVERY OF TARGETED
CONTENT OVER THE INTERNET
         
 
 KEY FACTS
 Symbol
     
     MDVX.OBCorporate Headquarters
     
     4636 East University DriveSuite 275Phoenix, AZ 85034Stock Price (10/7/2008 )|| 52-Week Range
     
     $1.72|| $.85-$1.98Shares Outstanding (4/18/08)
     
     41,407,643Market Capitalization
     
     $71.98MVolume (daily 90-day average)
     
     33,609Debt
     
     $0Insider Ownership
     
     Approximately 37%Institutional Ownership Shares
     
     NAFull-time Employees
     
     45Fiscal Year
     
     March 1 - Feb 28Accounting Firm
     
     Malone & Bailey PC
 
 
 BUSINESS METRICS
 NETWORK METRICS
      AGENCY METRICS
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 MODAVOX ENTERPRISE PLATFORM(TM)
 
 
 
 MODAVOX ENTERPRISE(TM) PLATFORM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 MODAVOX COMPETITION
 The MODAVOX Advantages
       Radio Competitors
Agency CompetitorsSirius/XM Satellite Radio
BrightcoveClear Channel Radio
Kit MediaCBS Radio
World NowBlue Lithium/Yahoo
AOL
 
 
 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
   
 
 LITIGATION VS. TACODA/AOL
 Modavox Inc. to Enter into Preliminary Settlement Talks with Tacoda - 10/15/2008
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 Growth Strategy
              
 
 Licensing Strategy
     
 
 
  
 Acquisition Strategy
      
 
 Financial Growth
 Current Run
Targeted Run
Targeted GrossRate
Rate
MarginNetwork
$3.5m
$4.5m
50%Agency
$0.5m
$2.0m
25%Licensing

TBD
TBDAcquisition

$10.0m
50%
 
 
 Summary
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-16-00761- CV

John S . Stritzinger , Appellan t

v. Christiana Trust, A Division of Wi lm ington S avings Fund S ociet y, F SB, Ap pellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 6-0 0185 2, H ONO RAB LE KARIN CRUMP , JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R

P ER CURIAM

Appellant J ohn Stritz inge r filed a notice of appea l i n t h e t ri al court on October 18, 2016. Stritz inge r, howe ver, ha s been de signated a ve x atious liti g ant.

A vexatious li tiga

nt must comply

with the proce dures se t forth in chapte r 11 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code as a prer equisite to filing “new litigation,” including obtaining permission from the appropr iate local administrative judge to file an appea l. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.102 (g ener ally prohibiting vexatious litigant from filing “new litigation” without permission from local administrative judge ), .103 (g ener ally prohibiting cler k of court from filing “litigation, orig inal proce eding , appea l, or other claim prese nted, pro se, by a vexatious litigant subject to a pref

iling order under Section 11.101 unless the litigant o b t ai n s an order from the appropriate local administrative judge descr ibed by Section 11.102(a) permitting the fili n g”) ;Johnson v. Hughey , No. 0 6 -12-00079- CV, 2012 Tex. App. L EXI S 8406, at *4–5 (Tex.

App.—Tex ar k ana Oct. 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.). The appropr iate local administrative judge with respec t to the filing of this appe al is:

The Honor able L ora L ivingston 261st District Court Travis County

Courthouse P. O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767.

Acc ording ly , this appea l is immediately stay ed. This Court order s Stritz inge r within thirty day s of the date of this order to demonstrate to this Court that he has obtained permission from the local administrative judge to file this appea l. I f he fails to comply with this order within 30 day s of the date of this order , this Court wil l dismi ss the appea l for wa nt of jurisdiction. I t is ordere d November

18, 2016.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield

2
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: July 23,2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2013-0289 

BALD MOUNTAIN 

AIR SERVICES, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2013WA910046 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

:·~- /~ · ·:r'· ~c~ L' ~ ~ ; \..• "j 

C~: 3 \ 

On July 9, 2013, an Order Setting Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, and 

Directing Rule 26(f) Planning and Submission was filed. Among other things, this Order set the 

Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference for Thursday, September 5, 2013 at 2:00p.m. Eastern 

time and set Thursday, August 29, 2013, as the deadline for filing a proposed discovery plan. 

On July 15,2013, the FAA filed a Withdrawal of Complaint so that it may file a Civil 

Penalty Letter. 

After reviewing all relevant caselaw, decisions, regulations, statutory authority, and being 

fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The August 29, 2013 deadline for filing a proposed discovery plan is cancelled. 

2. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for September 5, 2013 at 2:00p.m. 

Eastern time is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this 

proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Michael F. McKinley, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office ofthe Chief Counsel, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7100 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

Gary D. Porter, Vice President 

Bald Mountain Air Service, Inc., Re5pondent 

P.O. Box 3134 

Homer, AK 99603 

TEL: 907-235-7969 

FAX: 907-235-6602 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0289 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 

20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 99.1

            906 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code) (the "Act"), each of the undersigned officers
of Temtex Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31,
2002, (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)) and information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.





/s/ RICHARD N. ANDERSON
--------------------------------------
Richard N. Anderson
President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ JOHN F. GURROLA
--------------------------------------
John F. Gurrola
Secretary and Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  December  9, 2002



 THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION IS BEING FURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE ACT AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS PART OF THE
      PERIODIC REPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,320,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  569,926
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    617,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,537,699
<PP&E>                                         482,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                 108,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,957,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          448,353
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,601
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,385,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,957,378
<SALES>                                        735,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               735,745
<CGS>                                          581,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,936,111
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               344,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,498,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,498,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,498,652)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.78)


</TABLE>
The Honorable Stephen M. Reasoner, Chief Judge, United States District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2499

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Marty Linn Crafton, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 26, 1998 Filed: April 15, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. A n indictment charged Marty Linn Crafton with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e). After a jury found him guilty, the district court sentenced him to 210 months in prison. Crafton appeals his 1 conviction, and his counsel filed a brief pursuan t to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sufficiency of the evidence.-2-

At trial, Crafton stipulated he had been convicted of a crime punishable b y imprison ment

for a term exceeding one year; a number of witnesses testified the y observed Crafton holding a gun one evening during a scuffle at an Arkansas bar; and the bar owner testified he took the gun from Crafton and gave it to the police. I n addition, an agent with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms testified that the gun had been manufactured in Massach usetts. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude the government met its burden of proof. Se e United States v. Horsman , 114 F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 1997) (elements of § 922(g)(1) offense), cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 702 (1998); United S tates v. Balanga , 109 F.3d 1299, 130 1 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). After reviewing the record for an y nonfrivolous issues in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and having found none, we affirm the judgment of the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Donald Raymond LUCIANIA et al., Appellants, v. Rose LANCE et al., Appellees.

No. 69-347.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 19, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.