alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
 
We   consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the
registration statement of Cornerstone Imaging, Inc., on Form
S-8  (File  No.  33-09727) of our reports dated January  31,
1997  (except for note 13 as to which the date  is  February
14,  1997)  on  our  audits  of the  consolidated  financial
statements  and financial statement schedule of  Cornerstone
Imaging, Inc., as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and each  of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which
reports  are included in the Annual Report on Form  10-K  on
page 41 and II-1.
 
 
 
 
COOPERS & LYBRAND, L.L.P.
San Jose, California
March 28, 1997
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 20, 2004, except for notes C and W, as
to which the date is February 24, 2004, accompanying the financial statements
included in the Annual Report of SCOLR, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of SCOLR, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
333-79343, and No. 333-40290) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-107906).




Seattle, Washington
March 19, 2004
Exhibit C

Case 2:23-cv-00026 Document 1-3 Filed 03/16/23 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 31
1

Case 2:23-cv-00026 Document 1-3 Filed 03/16/23 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 32
2

Case 2:23-cv-00026 Document 1-3 Filed 03/16/23 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 33
3

Case 2:23-cv-00026 Document 1-3 Filed 03/16/23 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 34
263 La. 355

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Terrance MARKS, Jr.

No. 48998.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1972.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Hart-ley, Sp. Counsel, Frank T. Salter, Jr., Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Ernest C. Hunt, Jr., Lake Charles, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Terrance Marks, Jr., was convicted of aggravated rape and the death sentence imposed was affirmed by this Court. 252 La. 277, 211 So.2d 261 (1968).

Citing Stewart v. Massachusetts, 408 U. S. 845, 92 S.Ct. 2845, 33 L.Ed.2d 744 (1972), following Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment herein insofar as it left undisturbed the death penalty imposed and remanded this case to this Court for further proceedings. 408 U.S. 933, 92 S.Ct. 2849, 33 L.Ed.2d 746 (1972).

We construe the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court to require the im*254position of a sentence other than death. Cf., State v. Shaffer, 260 La. 605, 257 So.2d 121 (1971) and State v. Duplessis, 260 La. 644, 257 So.2d 135 (1971).

Accordingly, in compliance with the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court, the death sentence imposed upon defendant is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the 14th Judicial District Court with instructions to the trial judge to sentence the defendant to life imprisonment.

Case remanded.
#### Lorelle COLEMAN v. Mrs. Eva WARD and Paul M. Goswick.

No. 45689.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1970.

H. T. Carter, Dudley Carter, Columbus, for appellant.

Threadgill & Smith, Sams & Sams, Columbus, for appellees.

GILLESPIE, Presiding Justice.

Coleman, plaintiff in the Circuit Court of Lowndes County and appellant here, sued both Goswick, in whose truck he was a passenger, and Mrs. Ward, with whose vehicle Goswick’s truck collided, injuring plaintiff. The jury returned a verdict in favor of both defendants. Plaintiff appealed; before the case was briefed in this Court a settlement was reached between plaintiff and Mrs. Ward and the appeal was dismissed as to her.

*732The evidence justified the jury in finding that as Goswick was passing Mrs. Ward’s vehicle, Mrs. Ward suddenly and without warning or signal attempted to turn left onto a gravelled side road known as Officers’ Lake Road and which only runs west from the north-south paved highway upon which the involved vehicles were traveling. In so doing her vehicle crossed directly in front of Goswick’s pickup truck resulting in the collision in which plaintiff was injured.

Coleman maintains that he was entitled to a peremptory instruction on the issue of Goswick’s negligence based on the proposition that Goswick violated Mississippi Code 1942 Annotated, Section 8185 (1956) which prohibits a motorist from driving on the left side of the highway when approaching within one hundred feet of “any intersection” and, thus, was negligent as a matter of law. This T intersection is unmarked and, according to the overwhelming weight of the evidence, it is difficult to see the entrance to Officers’ Lake Road when traveling on the paved highway.

This Court said in Gore v. Patrick, 246 Miss. 715, 150 So.2d 169 (1963) the following :

> We are of the opinion that an intersection that is not marked by signs and which would not be observed by a reasonable careful operator of a motor vehicle is not an intersection within the meaning of the statute. Any other interpretation of the statute would not be sensible nor, would it be practical to obey. It would not be reasonable to require a motorist to observe this statute in respect to intersections which are not marked by signs or observable by the operator of a vehicle in the exercise of reasonable care. (246 Miss. at 721, 722, 150 So.2d 171).

Since the *Gore*case is controlling, plaintiff’s argument that Goswick was guilty of negligence as a matter of law is without merit. Moreover, this issue was presented to the jury by instructions 'most favorable to plaintiff.

The verdict was in accord with the overwhelming weight of the evidence including plaintiff’s own testimony.

Affirmed.

JONES, BRADY, INZER and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THEEXCHANGE ACT**

** **

I,Jerome E. Ball, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of ForwardIndustries, Inc. ("Forward") certify that:

-  I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10‐Q for the three months ended December 31, 2006, of Forward; 
-  Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;
-  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Forward as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
-  Forward's other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‐15(e) and 15d‐15(e))for Forward and we have:

-  designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toForward, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;
-  Not applicable; 
-  evaluated the effectiveness ofForward's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report  based on such evaluation;and
-  disclosed in this report anychange in Forward's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring Forward's most recent fiscal quarter (Forward's fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, Forward's internal control over financialreporting; and

-  Forward's other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to Forward's auditors and the audit committee ofForward's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

-  all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Forward'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and 
-  any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in Forward'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 7, 2007

/s/JeromeE. BallJerome E. BallChairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005, as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Terry D. Wall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: December 23, 2005               |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Terry D. Wall                      |   |   |        |
| Terry D. Wall*Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |   |

 

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1


                       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


The Stockholders and Directors
James River Bankshares, Inc.
Suffolk, Virginia


     We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of income, changes
in shareholders' equity, and cash flows of James River Bankshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not
audit the financial statements of State Bank of Remington, Inc., which
statements reflect total revenue constituting 13.3% of the related consolidated
totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been
furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included
for State Bank of Remington, Inc. is based solely on the report of other
auditors.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows of James River Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended
December 31, 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ Goodman & Company, L.L.P.


Colonial Heights, Virginia
January 28, 1999
#### Robert M. RICHARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-770.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUST


FORM
10-Q JUNE 30, 2009





Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust (“the
Company”) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael
L. Ashner, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
                /s/Michael
      L. AshnerName:
                Michael
      L. AshnerChief
      Executive Officer





August
10, 2009
### MEETING MINUTES

To: Tina Ndoh, US EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/

- Minerals and Manufacturing Group

From: Eastern Research Group, Inc.

Date: July 26, 2013

Subject: EPA Meeting with The Fertilizer Institute, July 24, 2013

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Mineral and Manufacturing Group met with

representatives of the The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) to discuss the risk and technology review for

the phosphate manufacturing sector.

1.0 Attendees

Name Company Repre senting E

- mail

Chris Leason Gallagher & Kennedy CSL@GKNET.com

Bill Herz TFI WCHGRZ@TFI.org

Matthew Witosky EPA Witosky.Matthew@EPA.gov

Ross Smith Potash Corp. rsmith@potashcorp.com

David Jellerson Mosaic David.jellerson@mosaicco.com

Steve David Mosaic Steve.david@mosaicco.com

Randy Taylor URS Randall.Taylor@urs.com

Jim Hirtz EPA Hirtz.james@epa.gov

Tina Ndoh EPA Ndoh.tina@epa.gov

William Land Mosaic William.land@mosaicco.com

Burl Ackerman Simplot Burl.ackerman@simplot.com

Anne Pope EPA Pope.anne@epa.gov

Ray Merrill EPA Merrill.raymond@epa.gov

Stef Johnson EPA Johnson.Steffan@epa.gov

Keith Barnette EPA Barnett.keith@epa.gov

Donna Lazzari ERG Donna.lazzari@erg.com



### 2.0 Meeting Notes

A brief summary of the meeting discussion topics are summarized below:

### • Tina Ndoh gave an overview of EPA’s RTR process, including the timing of the

scheduled proposal publication.

• A request was made by industry representatives that the comment period be as long as

possible, and that the docket be made available at the time of signature in order to give as

much time as possible for the review.

• Jim Hirtz gave an overview of the risk assessment process, including inhalation,

multipathway, and ecological risk.

• Industry requested a preview copy of the risk assessment. Tina Ndoh indicated that an

example methodology for the risk assessment process is available for recently published

proposals, but the phosphate risk assessment would not be available before the rule was

signed.

• Matt Witosky gave an overview of the changes being made to the SSM provisions.

Industry expressed concern about demonstrating compliance during startup and

shutdown with the standards that are written in terms of pounds of pollutant per ton of

feed. During startup and shutdown, the to n of feed denominator approaches zero.

• The group discussed the testing that was conducted for the ICR, and the difference

between the total fluoride and HF test methods.

• The group discussed possible methods to control or reduce emissions from gypstacks an d

cooling ponds.
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

____________________ 

NO. 09-17-00494-CV 

____________________ 

ULFCAR PRODUCTION APS, Appellant 

V. 

FLOWCRETE NORTH AMERICA, INC., RPM INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

FLOWCRETE GROUP LIMITED, FLOWCRETE UK, LTD, MARK 

GREAVES AND GRANT ADAMSON, Appellees 

_______________________________________________________ ______________ 

On Appeal from the 410th District Court 

Montgomery County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. 16-05-05576-CV

________________________________________________________ _____________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant, Ulfcar Production ApS, filed a motion to dismiss this 

accelerated appeal. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any 

decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed a notice 

of appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 
2 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 

 ________________________________ 

 STEVE McKEITHEN 

 Chief Justice 

Submitted on February 28, 2018 

Opinion Delivered March 1, 2018 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
No. 00-856.

#### Begala et al. *v.*PNC Bank, Ohio, National Assn.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2007, (the Report) of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                                                                                             
|----------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2007 |  | /s/ Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                                                         
|                  |  | Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                                                             
|                  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/Director                                                    
|                  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                               
|                  | 
|Date: May 7, 2007 |  | /s/ Francie P. Reppy                                                                                        
|                  |  | Francie P. Reppy                                                                                            
|                  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Chief Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis MIRAMBELL.

No. 62499.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 24, 1978.

In re: Louis Mirambell applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Jefferson.

Writ granted: The parole revocation of June 8, 1978 was erroneously made, the revocation is set aside, and the relator is discharged from restraint and confinement insofar as attributable to the parole revocation rule issued May 18, 1978. As to the sole violation charged by written notice (that the petitioner refrain from criminal conduct) the arrest and charge for the DWI offense does not constitute proof, in the absence of evidence as to the underlying offense, pretermitting whether the driving violation is under the circumstances within the condition prohibiting criminal conduct. *State v. O'Connor,*312 So.2d 645 (La.1975). As to the alleged violation of another condition (that the relator maintain psychiatric treatment), the written notice of the charge of probation violation did not specify this as a charge prior to the hearing and the court was in error in receiving evidence there as to, *State v. Harris,*312 So.2d 643 (La.1975), pretermitting whether the evidence so received actually proved such violation of this condition.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from this reversal of the ruling of the trial judge. In my view the finding of the trial judge was not an abuse of discretion.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.4


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (333-01574, 333-12789, and 333-24581); Form S-3 
(333-10383 and 333-14025); S-4 (333-13133); and Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 to Form S-4 on Form S-8 (333-36463) of our report dated June 7, 1996,
except for Note 9, as to which the date is October 24, 1996, relating to the 
financial statements of Fortran Corp., which report appears in this Annual 
report on Form 10-K of U.S. Office Products Company.

/s/ Rubin, Koehmsted & Nadler, PLC
--------------------------------------
Gary A. Koehmstedt, CPA
RUBIN, KOEHMSTEDT & NADLER, PLC
Springfield, Virginia
July 20, 1998
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Bomrsble &wtslle HoDDM~~ 

Diotriet Attorn.? 

Bi( spring, Tax*5 

?our rrpuert for 

rull,~ ccnel4rr.4 bf tair 

aur8t 68 follower 

pinion thfr auemtlon 

pntioaelJ drew2 

ot by the t&e54 back to the 

oeaberr that have 

nca the law lr uncoostirrnt ba.rtr< IA,-on the $usstlOC 

u pleame sdriss a~ about ttlr sttsr.’ 

Opinion lo. O-4lW of thl8 4o$n rthent , a44raseod to 

you, dated April 1, 104L, hold Bwee Bill 744 Of the 47th 

Logllilaturo UnaDnrtltutioMl. Thim 8ot war a lDCS1 aot providing ~SO.cO per month tr8~vding sx’p%~ese for tb+ countf 

jUdg# end aounty otidnlOQerD. one aaction Of the eat l ?- 

plied to Martlo County, T*xsD, a10rMJ. 

L. ..^ -- . . . . ..-.__.. ._ __ _- ______..-_ __ -_-. --..- ..-.. --....-.. ..-__ .---^..-_ _I _,.- ___^__._. ___.__.. _ 
pomorabla Eartoll. ~aDozml4, PI6* t 

Vtuler tbr muthorltlo8 sited and 8208 t&o r*88oa14 of oplnionr ROI. o-351 and O-4431 of thla drpnrtmult, 

rap188 ef uhlah mm l oslosod herawith rar rour lntoraatlon, 

it 18 our oplalon thst tha asPbar el the romml88lonar8* 

eoart of Yartlo county u&o h&d rraolvrd amnate frm Martin 

county under the rbmo drrarlbed unoonstltutloorl act rould 

b e liti: for l r *fJn0d 1l u í 8uah monoyr rrealrrd by thorn 

fr o 0 the data thy wa r e lrloed ti it8 uaoonrtltutionaft~ 

by rlther tha OountJ attorney, di8triat attsrm) or AttorW, oweral of Sexaa. 

Very truly your8