alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Earnest Elmo STEVENS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45739.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 9, 1970.

McKenzie & Kemp, Ashland, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Velia Ann Mayer, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

JONES, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of grand larceny in the Circuit Court of Union County, Mississippi, from which conviction he appeals, arguing two propositions:

The first is that the trial court erred in overruling a motion by appellant for continuance on the basis of surprise following an amendment to the indictment. The indictment originally charged the theft of many articles of personal property.

At the trial, the district attorney asked to amend by eliminating all of said articles except four. Appellant claimed surprise and asked for a continuance because he had prepared to meet the indictment, which contained many other items, and had a witness who would testify that various of the articles eliminated by the amendment were not stolen. The court permitted the amendment and overruled the motion for continuance. Of course, there was no error in this.

The second point argued, was an attack on the attorney who tried the case in lower court, claiming that said attorney was guilty of improper and questionable representation; which, in effect, denied appellant due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

The examination of the record discloses that the attorney ably represented the appellant and manifested competence and ability. The attack on him is by ex *731parte affidavits attached to the petition which, of course, we cannot consider.

Appellant also files with his brief herein a motion for alternate relief requesting that he be granted permission to file a petition for error coram nobis.

This petition is untimely filed and not in the form required.

We are affirming the conviction and denying the petition for alternate relief, such denial of the petition being without prejudice.

Conviction is affirmed and the petition for alternate relief denied without prejudice.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and BRADY, IN-ZER, and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8218 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8218

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
  increased Medicare payment for certain rural providers of ambulance 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2020

Mr. Gianforte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for 
  increased Medicare payment for certain rural providers of ambulance 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Ambulance Reimbursement 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. MEDICARE PAYMENT FOR CERTAIN RURAL PROVIDERS OF AMBULANCE 
              SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (8) of section 1834(l) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(l)) is amended in the matter following 
subparagraph (B), by inserting ``(or, in the case of mountainous 
terrain or in areas with only secondary roads available, a 15-mile 
drive)'' after ``within a 35-mile drive''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to ambulance services furnished on or after January 
1, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
MEMO.


TO:      Rob Lowery, HSNS

FROM:    Richard E. Brodsky

DATE:    12/5/00


         On behalf of William R. Dunavant, I propose the following. In exchange
for Dunavant's waiving objection to the failure of HSNS to file the North
Carolina fairness proceeding for the Dunavant shares, as was called for under
the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement:

         1.       HSNS will amend the currently filed Registration Statement on
Form S-1, SEC file no. 333-41730, to include, as to Dunavant, 2,000,000 HSNS
Shares plus any Monthly Shares (pursuant to Paragraph II.B of the October 26,
2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement and Paragraph 3 of this
memo) due and owing through the effective date of the Registration Statement,
and will use its best efforts to make the Registration Statement become
effective.

         2.       HSNS will continue the issuance of Monthly Shares under
Paragraph II.B of the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement
Agreement until the later of (a) the effectiveness of the Registration Statement
or (b) the receipt by Dunavant of Rule 144 letters as to all 2,000,000 Shares
plus Monthly Shares in his possession or due and owing as of March 15, 2001.

         3.       HSNS and Dunavant agree that Dunavant now holds 2,050,000 HSNS
Shares. 25,000 Shares are deemed to be in satisfaction of the Monthly Shares
requirement under Paragraph II.B of the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and
Restated Settlement Agreement for the period ended November 26, 2000. 25,000 are
deemed to be an advance on the Monthly Shares requirement under Paragraph II.B
of the October 26, 2000 Second Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement for the
period ended December 26, 2000. If the Registration Statement becomes effective
before December 26, 2000, these shares will not be included in the Registration
Statement as it becomes effective but instead will be restricted securities.

         If this is acceptable, please sign below where indicated and return to
me via fax.

High Speed Net Solutions, Inc.


By:  /s/ Andy Fox
   -----------------------------------------
Its: President & CEO
   -----------------------------------------

Dated: 12/5/00
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
James River Bankshares, Inc.
Suffolk, Virginia



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-99156, 333-07999 and 333-61329) of James River
Bankshares, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 1999, relating to the
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 1998 of James River Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries,
which report appears in the December 31, 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

GOODMAN & COMPANY, L.L.P.



Colonial Heights, Virginia 23834
March 19, 2001
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 November 7, 2008

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



<PAGE>

Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Registrant has reported its results of operations for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2008, as described in Registrant's press release dated
November 7, 2008, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Exhibit No.   Document
-----------   --------

99.1          Press release issued by the Registrant dated November 7, 2008.



                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: November 7, 2008                      By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 11
                                                        

                         COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

(Amounts in thousands except                 Periods Ended               
 per share amounts)
                                    March 22,1997   March 23,1996  
             
PRIMARY

NET INCOME                             $ 45,529         $40,853
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON
  SHARES AND OTHER COMMON
  STOCK EQUIVALENTS:
       COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING         469,098         473,138
       STOCK OPTIONS                        591            -    
                                        469,689         473,138  
 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE (*)         $  .10	       $   .09 

FULLY DILUTED

NET INCOME                              $45,529         $40,853  
ELIMINATION OF INTEREST EXPENSE,
 NET OF RELATED TAX EFFECT,
 APPLICABLE TO 5% CONVERTIBLE
 SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES DUE 2003           801             807 
ADJUSTED INCOME APPLICABLE TO
 COMMON STOCK                           $46,330         $41,660 
                                                                          
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON
  SHARES AND OTHER COMMON
  STOCK EQUIVALENTS:
        COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING        469,098        473,138 
        STOCK OPTIONS                       591              -           
        SHARES ISSUABLE UPON
        CONVERSION OF 5% CONVERTIBLE
        SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES DUE
          2003 				                      14,440         14,557   
                                        484,129        487,695       


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (*)   $  .10	      $   .09        


(*) NOTE:  Dilution is less than 3%.  Therefore, common stock equivalents
           have been excluded from the total weighted average common shares.
I

103D CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 621

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide punishments for fleeing

Federal law enforcement personnel during the execution of their duties.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 26, 1993

Mr. MCCANDLESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide punishments for fleeing Federal law enforcement personnel during the execution of their duties.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-Flight Act of

5 1993’’.

6 SEC. 2. TITLE 18 AMENDMENT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 73 of title 18, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

9 following:
2

•HR 621 IH

1 ‘‘§ 1518. Fleeing Federal law enforcement officer

2 ‘‘(a) Whoever, while driving a motor vehicle, know3 ingly and willfully flees a Federal law enforcement officer

4 in the execution of that officer’s duties shall be fined

5 under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or

6 both.

7 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘Federal law

8 enforcement officer’ means an individual described in sec9 tion 1114 of this title.’’.

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

11 at the beginning of chapter 73 of title 18, United States

12 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

13 item:

‘‘1518. Fleeing Federal law enforcement officer.’’.

Æ
 Aircraft

 WEIGHT (INCLUDING BATTERY AND PROPELLERS)

 1280 g

 DIAGONAL SIZE (INCLUDING PROPELLERS)

 590 mm

 MAX ASCENT SPEED

 5 m/s

 MAX DESCENT SPEED

 3 m/s

 HOVER ACCURACY

 Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/-

0.5 m

 Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m

 MAX SPEED

 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

 MAX ALTITUDE ABOVE SEA LEVEL

 6000 m

 OPERATING TEMPERATURE

 0°C to 40°C

 GPS MODE

 GPS/GLONASS

 Camera

 SENSOR

 Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 

12.76 M)

 LENS

 FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞

 ISO RANGE

 100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo) 

 SHUTTER SPEED

 8s -1/8000s

 IMAGE MAX SIZE

 4000 x 3000

 STILL PHOTOGRAPHY MODES

 Single Shot

 Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots

 Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5

 Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias

 Time-lapse

 VIDEO RECORDING MODES

 Phantom 3 Professional
 UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30

 FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

 HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

 Phantom 3 Advanced

 2.7K: 2704 x1520p 24/25/30 (29.97)

 FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

 HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

 SUPPORTED SD CARD TYPES

 Micro SD

Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

 MAX BITRATE OF VIDEO STORAGE

 Phantom 3 Professional

 60 Mbps

 Phantom 3 Advanced

 40 Mbps

 SUPPORTED FILE FORMATS

 FAT32/exFAT

 Photo: JPEG, DNG

 Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

 OPERATING TEMPERATURE

 0°C to 40°C

 Gimbal

 CONTROLLABLE RANGE

 Pitch -90° to +30°

 STABILIZATION

 3-axis (pitch, roll, yaw)

 Vision Positioning

 MAX VELOCITY

 Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground)

 ALTITUDE RANGE

 30 cm-300 cm

 OPERATING RANGE

 30 cm-300 cm

 OPERATING ENVIRONMENT

 Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15)

 Remote Controller

 OPERATING FREQUENCY

 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

 MAX DISTANCE

 2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)

 VIDEO OUTPUT PORT
 USB

 OPERATING TEMPERATURE

 0°C- 40°C

 BATTERY

 6000 mAh LiPo 2S

 MOBILE DEVICE HOLDER

 For tablet or phone

 RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER)

 -101 dBm ±2 dBm

 TRANSMITTER POWER (EIRP)

 FCC: 20 dBm

 CE: 16 dBm

 WORKING VOLTAGE

 1.2 A @7.4 V

 Battery Charger

 VOLTAGE

 17.4 V

 RATED POWER

 Phantom 3 Professional

 100 W

 Phantom 3 Advanced

 57 W

 Intelligent Flight Battery

 CAPACITY

 4480 mAh

 VOLTAGE

 15.2 V

 BATTERY TYPE

 LiPo 4S

 ENERGY

 68 Wh

 NET WEIGHT

 365 g

 MAX FLIGHT TIME

 Approximately 23 minutes 

 OPERATING TEMPERATURE

 -10°C to 40°C

 MAX CHARGING POWER

 100 W


#### MIAMI BEACH FIRST NATIONAL BANK and John S. Chowning, as Co-Executor of the Estate of Garfield A. Wood, Sr., Appellants, v. Garfield A. WOOD, Jr., and Theresa F. Wood, Appellees.

No. 72-1180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
AMERICANS CAN VOTE.

WHEREVER THEY ARE.

Did you know that Service members, 

their families, and overseas citizens can vote 

when away from their voting residence?
STEP

1

Register

and request 

your absentee

ballot at

FVAP.gov

STEP

2

Fill out and 

send in your 

ballot when 

it arrives

Get everything you need to vote absentee at FVAP.gov

HOW TO VOTE FROM ANYWHERE

WHEN YOU’RE IN THE MILITARY OR LIVING OVERSEAS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
RSI Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(commission File numbers 333-62573 and 33-95912) on Form S-8 of RSI Systems,
Inc., of our report dated August 12, 1999, except as to notes 3 and 5 which are
as of September 3, 1999, and note 7(b) which is as of September 7,1999, relating
to the balance sheets of RSI Systems, Inc., as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1999, which report
appears in the June 30, 1999, annual report on Form 10-KSB of RSI Systems, Inc.







Minneapolis, Minnesota
September 24, 1999
#### Rudy P. BROWN v. EXPRESSWAY TIRE & APPLIANCE, INC., et al. Roy PERRILLOUX et al. v. Rudy P. BROWN.

Nos. 8817 and 8818.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Feb. 14, 1978.

*1056Leon C. Vial, III, Hahnville, for Rudy P. Brown.

Bruce W. Dinwiddie, Ernest V. Richards, IV, Metairie, for Roy Perilloux.

Before REDMANN, BOUTALL and BEER, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Defendant Roy Perriloux appeals from a refusal to dissolve an order preliminarily enjoining him from exercising any function as president of a corporation of which he is majority shareholder, and appointing plaintiff as “administrator and overseer” of the corporation. We reverse and dissolve the preliminary injunction and terminate the appointment.

We dismiss defendant’s argument of lack of jurisdiction in the trial court because, see La.Const. art. 5 § 16, it is apparently a question of venue, and in any case it is waived by failure to object preliminarily, C.C.P. 7 and 44.

The fatal defect of the preliminary injunction was that defendant was not allowed to present evidence at the trial. Defendant was denied any meaningful opportunity to be heard at that “trial” (see Tr. 57-58). The preliminary injunction was therefore issued in violation of C.C.P. 3602 and is therefore dissolved.

La.R.S. 12:151C authorizes appointing a receiver ex parte “pending trial” and § 151A(1) allows appointment after trial. Together those statutes make it clear that the ex parte appointment is only a temporary, emergency measure, the effectiveness of which cannot continue beyond the time reasonably necessary to have a trial at which opposition to an appointment could be heard. We conclude that that *1057reasonable time has elapsed and that, for lack of opportunity for defendant to be heard, no post-trial appointment could be effective. Accordingly we terminate the appointment of plaintiff as “administrator and overseer” of the corporation.

(That corporate dissolution proceedings may be in progress does not render this appeal moot because of the possible claims for attorneys’ fees under R.S. 12:151D.)

Reversed; preliminary injunction dissolved; appointment of administrator and overseer terminated.
#### TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Irwin HANSON, as natural father of the Deceased minor, John Scott Hanson, Appellee.

No. R-93.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 30, 1973.

Gosney, Hutcheson & Haas, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Hoffman, Hendry, Parker, Smith & Anderson, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, awarding appellee $50,000.00 for the death of his minor son.

The record on appeal, briefs and oral argument herein having been fully considered, and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed is erroneous, the said judgment is therefore affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### Warren TREMBLAY, Appellant, v. Eleanor LIPPMAN, as successor administratrix to the Estate of Jeffrey Lippman, a Deceased minor, and Eleanor Lippman, individually, Appellee.

No. 71-994.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 5, 1972.

Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Schwartz & Perse; Sams, Anderson, Alper, Spencer & Post, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Braddock v. Seaboard Airline R. Co., Fla.1955, 80 So.2d 662; Little River Bank & Trust Co. v. Magoffin, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 626; Tyus v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad Company, Fla.1961, 130 So.2d 580; Urga v. State, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 719; Atlas Properties, Inc. v. Didich, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 278; Nimnicht v. Ostertag, Fla.App.1969, 225 So.2d 459; Laskey v. Smith, Fla.1970, 239 So.2d 13; Riley v. Jackson, Fla.App.1971, 246 So.2d 625; Threets v. Hardison, Fla.1971, 255 So.2d 267.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6969** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v.
KELLY GEORGE STANBACK , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. Michael F. Urbanski , District Judge. ( 5:02

- cr - 30020

- SGW

- 1 )

Submitted : September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kelly George Stanb a ck, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorneys, Elizabeth G. Wright, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kelly George Stanb a ck appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. * We have
reviewed the record and find no rev ersible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Stanb a ck , No. 5:02

- cr - 30020

- SGW

- 1 (W.D. Va. filed June
8 and entered June 9 , 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court granted Stanb a ck’ s § 3582 motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Stanb a ck’ s sentence to the full extent he requested.