alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

August 26, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Color versions of labels proposed by EPA and DOT in Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking “Revisions and Additions to Motor Vehicle Fuel Economy 

Label”

FROM: Roberts W. French, Jr.

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0865

This document replicates in color the label designs that are published in the 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking “Revisions and Additions to Motor Vehicle Fuel 

Economy Label.” The use of color is integral to the label designs being proposed, and 

because the Federal Register is not published in color, EPA is making the color versions 

easily available via this docket memo, which is available both in the public docket and 

directly from the EPA website at http://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy/regulations.htm. The 

figure numbers correspond to those appearing in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

Please note that these labels are examples and do not represent real automobiles.
2

Figure III-1. Label 1 for gas/diesel vehicle, B grade.
3

Figure III-2. Label 1 for electric vehicle, A+ grade.
4

Figure III-3. Label 1 for PHEV, A grade.
5

Figure III-4. Label 1 for gas/diesel vehicle, C grade.
6

Figure III-5. Label 1 for gas/diesel vehicle, D grade.
7

Figure III-6. Label 1 for PHEV, Option 2.
8

Figure III-7. Label 1 for CNG vehicle, A- grade.
9

Figure III-8. Label 1 for FFV, B grade.
10

Figure III-9. Label 2 for gas/diesel vehicle.
11

Figure III-10. Label 2 for electric vehicle.
12

Figure III-12. Label 2 for PHEV (predominantly blended type).

Figure III-11. Label 2 for PHEV, extended range electric (series) type.
13
14

Figure III-13. Label 2 for CNG vehicle.
15

Figure III-14. Label 2 for FFV.
16

Figure III-15. Label 3 for gas/diesel vehicle.
17

Figure III-16. Label 3 for electric vehicle.
18

Figure III-17. Label 3 for PHEV, extended range electric (series) type.
19

Figure III-18. Label 3 for PHEV, predominantly blended type.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND UNAUDITED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         313,784
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,646,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                   133,800
<INVENTORY>                                  1,926,889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,960,804
<PP&E>                                         804,310
<DEPRECIATION>                                 186,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,519,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,852,254
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           62,865
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,604,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,519,153
<SALES>                                      5,862,774
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,862,774
<CGS>                                        3,791,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,791,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,266,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                804,951
<INCOME-TAX>                                   221,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            582,971
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   582,971
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Federal Trade Commission 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of Commissioner 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

CONCURRING STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER REBECCA KELLY 

SLAUGHTER 

Regarding the Request for Comment on the Funeral Rule 

Commission File No. P034410 

February 4, 2020 

I am grateful that the Commission is seeking public comment on the FTC’s Funeral Rule, 16 C.F.R. 

pt. 453, which we last reviewed a dozen years ago. At that time, the Commission decided to leave 

the Rule unchanged. See Fed. Trade Comm’n, Regulatory Review of the Trade Industry Regulation on Funeral 

Industry Practices, 73 Fed. Reg. 13740, 13741 (Mar. 14, 2008). Accordingly, the Rule has not been 

updated in more than twenty-six years. See Fed. Trade Comm’n, Funeral Industry Practices Trade 

Regulation Rule, 59 Fed. Reg. 1592 (Jan. 11, 1994). I worry that the Rule is now showing its age, and I 

look forward to hearing from commenters about what a Funeral Rule for the twenty-first century 

should look like. 

The Funeral Rule is one that tends to go unnoticed by most consumers in their daily lives. Few 

consumers shop for funeral services before the need for them arises exigently. But that is precisely 

why funeral consumers are uniquely vulnerable—grieving their lost loved one, beset by scores of 

unanticipated tasks, and operating under enormous time pressure, consumers must make financial 

decisions that are often on the order of buying a new compact car. Because of these vulnerabilities, 

the funeral industry has had patterns of unfair and deceptive practices, effectively denying 

consumers the information they needed to give their lost loved one a tailored and proper goodbye 

without breaking the bank or paying for unwanted services. The Funeral Rule has taken important 

steps to curb these practices by providing much-needed protections to consumers. 

The past twenty-six years have seen momentous changes in technology, such as the rise of the 

internet and price-comparison tools, and in culture, such as the dramatic rise in consumers who 

choose cremation. Many funeral homes today even offer live-streaming of services for loved ones 

who are unable to attend in person. My fervent hope is that the Commission, with the help of 

commenters, will endeavor to update the Rule so that it continues to fulfill its purpose of protecting 

uniquely vulnerable consumers in their time of greatest need. I particularly look forward to 

comments that highlight any gaps in existing protections and how we might best close them. 

1
---

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
      Chartered Accountants
      PricewaterhouseCoopers Place
      250 Howe Street, Suite 700
      Vancouver, British Columbia
      Canada V6C 3S7
      Telephone +1 (604) 806 7000
      Facsimile +1 (604) 806 7806



**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form
40-F/A (Amendment No. 2) of our report dated March 31, 2008, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Great Basin Gold Ltd which appears in this Annual Report
on Form 40-F/A.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our Report
in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (No. 333-141985).

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chartered Accountants Vancouver, British Columbia March
31, 2008



"PricewaterhouseCoppers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.

---
SERVE D JANUAR Y 4,201 1 ARTMEN T O F 

### , --inPORT/^IO N • 1 OPERATION S U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N i - H ' ! ^ t - 5 b OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH EMATTE RO F OKLAHOM A SKYDIVIN GCENTE R FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10SW002 0 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DMSNO . FAA-2010-121 5

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2009SW150061 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . All future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , andth e other persons o n th e attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Yo d Chie f Administrative? : Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10SW002 0 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Bre t A . Glenn , Respondent' s Counse l Bre t A . Glen , Attorne y at

Law . P.C , 41 4 N.W . 4^

^ Street , Suit e 20 0 Oklahom aCity , O K

7310 2 TEL : 405-702-498 0 FAX : 405-702-498 4 Gregor y S . Lander , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Safet

y Enforcemen t

Branc h Offic e o f th e Regional Counse l Southwes t Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBlvd. , Roo m63 3 Fort Worth , TX 7613 7 TEL : 817-222-508 3 FAX ; 817-222-594 5 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servicewasb

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration

, 80 0 Independenc

e Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.
Exhibit 32.11st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION135 EAST TUGALO STREETP.O. BOX 880TOCCOA, GEORGIA  30577TELEPHONE:  (706) 886-7571August 13, 2019Re:Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Ladies and Gentlemen:Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the quarterly report of 1st Franklin Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-Q on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, that, to such officer’s knowledge:(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report./s/ Virginia C. HerringName:  Virginia C. HerringTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson 

Alvaro M. Bedoya 

In the Matter of 

HomeAdvisor, Inc., a corporation, 

d/b/a Angi Leads, DOCKET NO. 9407 

d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered by Angi. 

ORDER DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND SPECIFYING FACTS 

WITHOUT SUBSTANTIAL CONTROVERSY 

Pursuant to Rule 3.24(a)(5) of the Federal Trade Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 

C.F.R. § 3.24(a)(5), the Commission hereby directs further proceedings in this action and 

specifies the facts that appear without substantial controversy. The Initial Decision’s findings 

of fact may supplement and modify the facts specified, as appropriate, to reflect additional 

detail and the resolution of factual disputes. Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, due to ongoing public health concerns related to 

COVID-19, the evidentiary hearing in this proceeding, scheduled to commence on November 

9, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., will be conducted virtually by video conference; public access to the 

hearing, to the extent consistent with the protection of confidential information and for 

monitoring purposes only, will be provided via telephone or live web streaming; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the following facts shall be deemed established 

for purposes of this proceeding: 

1 



 

 

 

HomeAdvisor employees comport with HomeAdvisor policy.} CCSF ¶ 52; 

RCCSF ¶ 52. 

31. {Members of HomeAdvisor’s quality assurance team use a scorecard to 

assess sales representative performance on calls, noting when policies were 

violated during a sales call.} CCSF ¶ 54; RCCSF ¶ 54. 

32. {Severe policy violations can result in “auto fails,” which can trigger 

disciplinary action.} CCSF ¶ 55; RCCSF ¶ 55. 

By the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

SEAL: 

ISSUED: September 9, 2022

5
EXHIBIT 23.1








                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (commission file No. 33-51584), on Form S-8 (commission
file No. 33-68890), and on Form S-8 (commission file No. 333-28571) of our
reports dated February 17, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Appliance Recycling Centers of
America, Inc., and Subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 28, 2002.






                                                         McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 21, 2003
263 La. 281

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Arthur MITCHELL.

No. 52568.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1972.

Picou & Picou, Cynthia Picou, Leon A. Picou, Jr., St. Francisville, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty.- Gen., Richard H. Kilbourne, Dist. Atty., Fred C. Jackson, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Arthur Mitchell, appeals his jury conviction of simple escape (La. R.S. 14:110) on the basis of two bills of exceptions reserved and perfected during his trial. However, we do not consider these bills because there is an error, patent on the face of the error, which merits attention. (La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920).

The court minutes state: “The jury then rendered a written verdict as follows . . . State v. Arthur Mitchell, Guilty Simple Escape, signed Jessie J. Bordelon, Foreman.” However, in the verdict itself the word “guilty” was not used, and, indeed, it does not specify its decision. The verdict itself reads: “Verdict, simple escape, signed Jessie Bordelon, Foreman . . .”

This verdict is not responsive to the indictment. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 815. “The finding of the jury of the guilt of the prisoner must be direct and positive . *227the court is not authorized or justified to ‘reason’ to an inferred verdict of guilty against the accused” where the verdict consists simply of a recitation of the name of the crime, not prefixed by the words “guilty of”. State v. Johnson, 46 La.Ann. 5, 14 So. 295 (1894); State v. Flanakin, 128 La. 455,. 54 So. 940 (1911); *Cf.*State c. Milam, 176 La. 879, 147 So. 22 (1933). *See also;*La.C.Cr.P. art. 810; State v. Gueringer, 209 La. 118, 24 So.2d 284 (1924); 5 Wharton’s Criminal Law and Procedure § 2129 at 321 (1957).

The conviction and sentence are reversed, and the case is remanded for a new trial.

SANDERS, J., dissents.
MADEIII 

in the 111 

US.A111 

An FTC Workshop 

Thursday, September 26, 2019 | Washington, DC

AGENDA 

7:45-8:30 am Registration 

Enter at 7th and D Street, SW and proceed through airport-style security. 

8:30-8:50 am Opening 

Andrew Smith, Director, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC 

Welcome 

James Kohm, Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, 

Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC 

8:50-9:15 am The FTC and Made In USA Claims

 Julia Solomon Ensor, Attorney, Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC 

Shiva Koohi, Economist, Bureau of Economics, FTC 

9:15-10:15 am Discussion 1: Consumer Perception – How Do Consumers Interpret 

Made In USA Claims? 

10:15-10:30 am Break 

10:30-11:15 am Discussion 2: Doing Business Under the Current Policy – What Are 

the Compliance or Policy Challenges Under the Current Framework? 

11:15 am-12:30 pm Discussion 3: Enforcement Approaches – Should the Commission 

Reexamine Its Current Approach to Addressing Deceptive Made in 

USA Claims? 

12:30-12:45 pm Closing Remarks and Invitation to Comment 

James Kohm, Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, 

Bureau of Consumer Protection, FTC 
             

MADEIII 

in the 111 

US.A111 

An FTC Workshop 

Thursday, September 26, 2019 | Washington, DC

PANELISTS 

Justin Brookman, Consumer Reports 

Mark Hanna, Richline Group, Inc. 

Kristen Kern, American Apparel & Footwear Association 

Clint Morris and Tim Schade, Lifetime Products 

Annemarie O’Shea, Walmart Inc. 

Bonnie Patten, TruthInAdvertising.org 

Scott Paul, Alliance for American Manufacturing 

Pete Wicks, The Homer Laughlin China Company 

MODERATORS 

Julia Solomon Ensor, FTC 

Laura Koss, FTC 

Hampton Newsome, FTC
U.S. Department of Energy

Manufactured Housing Working Group

September 9 - 10, 2014

Summary

Day 1: September 9, 2014**

9:00 – 9:30 Introductions (including remote), housekeeping

9:30 – 10:00 Opening remarks by the WG members

10:00 – 12:00 DOE (Navigant): LCC Presentation (Including Fuel Types), Initial 

cost/performance plotting, discussion, identify any additional 

runs/analysis

12:00 – 1:00 LUNCH BREAK

1:00 – 4:30 Subcommittee Reports

 Finance (Stacey Epperson)

 (Please note, this is not related to affordability)

 Manufacturing (David Tompos)

 Trial Standard Levels (Michael Lubliner)

 2015 IECC Scope (Manny Santana)

4:30 – 5:00 Public Comment, other DOE administrative items, next steps, 

conclude

Day 2: September 10, 2014**

9:00 – 9:30 WG Comment

9:30 – 12:00 Continue Subcommittee Reports

 Finance (Stacey Epperson)

 (Please note, this is not related to affordability)

 Manufacturing (David Tompos)

 Trial Standard Levels (Michael Lubliner)

 2015 IECC Scope (Manny Santana)

12:00 – 1:00 LUNCH BREAK

1:00 – 2:00 Affordability Concept (Robin Roy)

2:00 – 3:30 Straw Man Proposals and Position Paper Review (Emanuel Levy)

Review of new LCC runs and additional analysis

3:30 – 4:30 Term Sheet Structure/Definitions (Navigant)

4:30 – 5:00 Public Comment, Recap/Review, Next Steps, Homework, Review 

Schedule and Wrap-up Comments

** Breaks at the request of the group
DATE Location Room Webinar Link

September 9, 2014 DOE Forrestal 8E-089 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/887855449

September 10, 2014 DOE Forrestal 8E-089 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/896904784

September 22, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/915091240

September 23, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/278235472

October 1, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/585091001

October 2, 2014 DOE Forrestal GH-019 https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/726540504
#### Roy ANDERSON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 73-509.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 8, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

Certification requirements set forth in Section 302(a) ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

 

I, Neil H. Ellis, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofFirst Hartford Corporation.

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 24, 2008       

 

By: /s/ Neil H. Ellis           

       Neil H. Ellis

       President