alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### The State of New Hampshire 

## Department ofEnvironmental Services

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner

Mr. Curtis Spalding Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 December 16, 2014



### Re: Revision to New Hampshire's State Implementation Plan to Meet the Requirements of the Clean Air Act, Section 169A, Protection ofVisibility- Regional Haze Progress Report and Amendment to Env-A 2302.02, Emission Standards Applicable to Tangential-Firing, Dry-Bottom Boilers
Dear Mr. Spalding:
Pursuant to Section 110 ofthe federal Clean Air Act as amended, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) submits one hard copy and one electronic copy ofthis State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to fulfill the requirements of section 169A, pertaining to protection ofvisibility. The enclosed SIP revision includes New Hampshire' s Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report and a related amendment to administrative rule Env-A 2302.02, Emission Standards Applicable to Tangential-Firing, Dry

-Bottom Boilers. NHDES has prepared this SIP revision in accordance with the general SIP submittal requirements of40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V and in accordance with USEPA regulations and guidance on regional haze plans and progress reports. As Governor Maggie Hassan ' s designee, I am requesting EPA's approval ofthis SIP revision.
The USEPA and the Federal Land Managers have provided comments on the regional haze progress report. NHDES has addressed these comments in the SIP revision and has included documentation certifying the public process. Ifyou have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact JeffUnderhill at (603) 271-1102.

caw/chm enclosures: paper copy and electronic copy via email and postal service

ec: Anne Arnold, EPA Region I Anne McWilliams , EPA Region I Holly Salazer, NPS Tim Allen, FWS Ralph Perron, FS Bret Anderson, FS 

### www.des.nh.gov Sincerely,

# 4-o£U~·~ Craig A. Wright Director Air Resources Division

29 Hazen Drive • PO Box 95 • Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3503 • TDD Access : Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
No. 00-526.

#### Tawfik *v.*Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of SystemOne Technologies
Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Paul I.
Mansur, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven M. Healy, Director
of Finance and Administration of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: March 25, 2004
    
    /s/  Paul I. Mansur
Paul I. Mansur
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 25, 2004
    
    /s/  Steven M. Healy
Steven M. Healy
Director of Finance and Administration
(Principal Financial Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the report
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
(whether made before or after the date of the report, irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing).
EXHIBIT K

CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 209

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:249
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 210

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 2 of 9 Page ID #:250
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 211

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:251
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 212

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 4 of 9 Page ID #:252
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 213

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 5 of 9 Page ID #:253
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 214

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 6 of 9 Page ID #:254
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 215

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 7 of 9 Page ID #:255
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 216

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 8 of 9 Page ID #:256
CRI Genetics, LLC Complaint - Page 217

Case 2:23-cv-09824 Document 2-4 Filed 11/20/23 Page 9 of 9 Page ID #:257
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7967 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7967

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1050 Sunset Road Southwest in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as the ``Jose 
                   Hernandez Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 7, 2020

   Ms. Haaland (for herself, Mr. Lujan, and Ms. Torres Small of New 
   Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1050 Sunset Road Southwest in Albuquerque, New Mexico, as the ``Jose 
                   Hernandez Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOSE HERNANDEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1050 Sunset Road Southwest in Albuquerque, New Mexico, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Jose Hernandez Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jose 
Hernandez Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7880
RANDOLPH WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00213-TSE) Submitted: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 1, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randolph Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Deana A. Malek, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Randolph Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Stanley ZENO v. CLERK OF COURT, 15TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LAFAYETTE PARISH, Louisiana.

No. 61970.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 28, 1978.

In re: Stanley Zeno applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Lafayette.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Leisure Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
G. Brandano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Daniel G. Brandano
----------------------
Daniel G. Brandano
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2006
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-30655, 333-74715,
333-78567, 333-62502, 333-90986, 333-91002, 333-117334, 333-137396, 333-153659, and 333-162130 on
Form S-8 of our reports dated June 4, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of THQ Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") and the effectiveness of
the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. for the year ended April 3, 2010.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los
Angeles, California
June 4, 2010

---



QuickLinks
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Sooner Holdings,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Report"),  I, R.C.  Cunningham  III,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  July 25, 2007
                                                     /s/ R.C. Cunningham III
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     R.C. Cunningham III
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


     The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.1350) and is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.








                                                                    Exhibit 32.1
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**In connection with the Annual Report of PetSmart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended February 3, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Lawrence P. Molloy, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: March 28, 2008   */s/ Lawrence P. Molloy* Lawrence P. Molloy   Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350), has been provided to PetSmart, Inc. and will be retained by PetSmart, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of PetSmart, Inc. under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.
79
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: Phil Madore [papaphil72@hotmail.com] 

Sent: . _. Saturday, February 13, 20102:21 PM 

To: Oevany, Dennis (OST) 


Subject: Let's petition to keep Cape Air .... ! 


; 

To Whom it May- Concern: , " ""1'4\' 

I fully agree with your segment .. Cape Air loss a big mistake. Let's start an online petition to oust out our 


elected officials decision to bring in Colgan Air in favor of Cape Air. I feel like your article stated, had all 


the facts been revealed such as fewer flights, more expensive air fares and more than likely flight 


cancellations due to flights not being filled the results would of been very different; 


I'll sign, as I'm sure many more .from the North Country will do the same to reverse this legislature. 


Thank You for your efforts. 


Phil Madore 

Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft's powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now. 

1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 10438]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition “John Singer Sargent and Chicago's Gilded Age,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute of Chicago, in Chicago, Illinois, from on or about July 1, 2018, until on or about September 30, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000.                

Marie Therese Porter Royce,

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-12588 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 2, 2017














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of July 31, 2017 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$15,194Sub-advised funds1,403Institutional accounts4,529Total$21,126





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,629Small-Mid Cap3,473Mid Cap109Large Cap9,790All Cap Select382Long-Short4,969Corporate bonds676Core fixed income311(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(213)Total$21,126








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:August 2, 2017By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
Slip-Op 02-15
UNITED STATES COURT OF I NTERNATIONAL

TRADE

: DA JIN (U.S.) TRADI

NG COMPANY, : INC., : : Plaintiff, : : Befor

e: WALLACH, J udge v. : Court No.: 02-00155 : THE UNI TED STATE S, : : Defend ant, :

: and : : ABC COKE, et al., : : Defendant-Inte

rvenors :

: :

ORDER Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary I

njunction and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary

Injunction; the Court having review ed the pleadings and papers on file her ein, and having heard oral arg ument on Wednesday, Fe bruary 20, 2002, w

ith Plaintiff Da Jin (U.S.) Trading Company , Inc., appear ing by a nd through Jeffrey

S. Neeley, Esq., De fendant, United States of America, appearing by and through Lucius B . Lau, Esq., and Defe ndant-Intervenors ABC Coke, et al., appearing by and through Roger B. Schag rin, Esq.; and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss be, and hereby is, GRANTE

D on the g

rounds tha

t this cour t lacks su bject mat ter juris diction to hear this case under 28 U.S.C. §1581(i), the only basis for jurisdiction asserted by Plaintiff in its Amended Complaint, since jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1581(c) is or could have been available, Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States , 963 F.2d 356, 359 (Fed. Cir. 1992); and on the grounds that Plaintiff has failed to exhaust its available administrative remedies, Nippon Steel Corp. v. United States , 219 F.3rd 1348 (Fed. Cir. 2000) and Sandvik Steel Co. v. United States , 164 F.3rd 596 (Fed. Cir. 1998); and it is furtherORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Temporary Restraining Order previous ly e

ntered i n this cas e in favo r of Plain tiff and a gainst D efenda

nt be, and hereby is, dissolved, and it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all other pending motions in the above entitled matter be, and hereby are denied as moot; and it is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint in the above entitled matter be, and hereby is, DISMISSED

__________________________ Evan J . Wal lach, Judge
Dated: February

20, 2002 New York, New York
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. §1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of MDSI Mobile Data Solutions Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Erik Dysthe, the Chief Executive Officer, President
& Chairman of the Board and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Erik Dysthe 
Chief Executive Officer, President &
Chairman of the Board and Director
March 31, 2005
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---