alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rohit Chopra 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson 

File No. P215800 

RESOLUTION DIRECTING USE OF COMPULSORY PROCESS TO COLLECT 

INFORMATION REGARDING PHYSICIAN GROUP AND 

HEALTHCARE FACILITY MERGERS 

Nature and Scope of Matter: 

To assess the competitive impact of physician group and healthcare facility mergers in 

markets for healthcare services. The Federal Trade Commission hereby resolves and directs any 

and all compulsory processes available to it be used in connection with this inquiry. 

Authority to Conduct Investigation: 

Sections 6, 9, 10, and 20 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 

§§ 46, 49, 50, 57b-1; FTC Procedures and Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 1.1 et seq., and 

supplements thereto; Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 18, as amended. 

By direction of the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Acting Secretary 

Issued:
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                               March 1, 2012

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.    Other Events
----------   --------------------------------------------

     The following is a summary of assets under management as of February 29,
2012 (in millions):


	By Investment Vehicle
	---------------------

Separate Accounts	 	$  3,496
Mutual Funds 			   4,610
Sub-Advised Mutual Funds	   1,007
Private Investment Funds	     172
                                --------
Total			       	$  9,285


	By Investment Strategy
	----------------------
Small Cap			$  1,007
Small-Mid Cap		             306
Select (All Cap)		     347
Large Cap 			   5,194
Long-Short		           2,247
Strategic Income		     184
				--------
Total			        $  9,285


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------


     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: March 1, 2012	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifiesthat this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

Date:                    February 9, 2007
|        | Michael T. Vesey                      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael T. Vesey                      |   |
|   | President and Chief Operating Officer |   |

 

----
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 982 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 35 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
#### John Henry COBB, William C. Groover and Louis J. Ferris, Jr., Appellants, v. Opal CLEVENGER, Appellee.

No. 0-207.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Feb. 23, 1971.

William D. Reynolds and Tench & Goldin, Gainesville, fo.r appellants.

*553Thomas J. Collins, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record on appeal and appellants’ brief filed herein, it appears that appellants have failed to demonstrate that the final judgment being reviewed herein is erroneous. Accordingly, the court elects to dispense with oral argument in accordance with Florida Appellate Rule 3.10 subd. e, 32 F.S.A., and the judgment reviewed is

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 21, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00812

- CV

Ken KINSEY and Arty Straehla

,

Appellant s

v.

AL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC,

Appellee s

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Co urt No. 2018CI22581

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant’s First Unop posed Motion to Extend Time to File Reply Brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to May 7, 2020.

I t is so ORDERED on this 21st day of April, 2020

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_____________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8063 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive the fee for installment 

agreements paid by electronic payment through a debit instrument. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 14, 2020 

Mr. VELA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive 

the fee for installment agreements paid by electronic 

payment through a debit instrument. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Installation Agreement 

5 Affordability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSTALLMENT FEE WAIVED FOR CERTAIN ELEC7 TRONIC PAYMENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6159(f)(2) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘(2) WAIVER OR REIMBURSEMENT.— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8063 IH

1 ‘‘(A) In the case of a taxpayer who has 

2 agreed to make payments under the installment 

3 agreement by electronic payment through a 

4 debit instrument, no fee shall be imposed on an 

5 installment agreement under this section. 

6 ‘‘(B) In the case of a taxpayer with an ad7 justed gross income, as determined for the most 

8 recent year for which such information is avail9 able, which does not exceed 250 percent of the 

10 applicable poverty level (as determined by the 

11 Secretary), if the taxpayer is unable to make 

12 payments under the installment agreement by 

13 electronic payment through a debit instrument, 

14 the Secretary shall, upon completion of the in15 stallment agreement, pay the taxpayer an 

16 amount equal to any such fees imposed.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 this section shall apply to installment agreements entered 

19 into after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                    UT
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000,000
<CIK>                                        0000357261
<NAME>                                       FLORIDA PROGRESS CORPORATION
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<BOOK-VALUE>                                           PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                                  3,524
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                                  892
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       804
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                                     124
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                               185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             5,529
<COMMON>                                                   1,209
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                          662
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                             1,871
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                   34
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                                       1,827
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                                94
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                                 25
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                             1,678
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                              5,529
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                                  1,545
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                          18
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 1,412
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                                 1,430
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                                      115
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                             0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                               115
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      66
<NET-INCOME>                                                  49
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                    1
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                                 48
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                                     102
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                                      0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                                       195
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.50
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 
  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 16, 2012 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Network CN Inc. included in the annual report on Form 10-K of Network CN Inc. and subsidiaries and variable interest entities as of December 31, 2011 and for the year then ended, which report will be filed into the annual report on Form 10-K of Network CN Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2013.
  
 /s/Baker Tilly Hong Kong Limited
 
 BAKER TILLY HONG KONG LIMITED
 Certified Public Accountants
 
 Hong Kong
 May 10, 2013
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TORULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT**

I,Douglas W. Sabra, Chief Financial Officer of Forward Industries, Inc. ("Forward")certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10‐QSB for the three months ended June 30, 2005, of Forward;

2.          Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Forward as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

4.          Forward's other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a‐15(e) and 15d‐15(e))for Forward and we have:

a)         designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toForward, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

b)          Not applicable;

c)         evaluated the effectiveness ofForward's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report  based on such evaluation;and

d)         disclosed in this report anychange in Forward's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring Forward's most recent fiscal quarter (Forward's fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, Forward's internal control over financialreporting; and

5.          Forward's other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to Forward's auditors and the audit committee ofForward's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)         all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Forward'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;  and

b)         any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in Forward'sinternal controls over financial reporting.

Date: July 25, 2005

/s/Douglas W. SabraDouglas W. SabraChiefFinancial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Carl Bradford PHILLIPS v. DRESSER ENGINEERING CO. and the Home Indemnity Co.

No. 61208.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Dresser Engineering Co. and Home Indemnity Co. applying for certiorari *1049or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Cameron. 351 So.2d 304.

Denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS, J., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 94-20863

Conference Calendar

__________________

C. S. HOBBS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOBBY MELVIN VINCENT ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 92-CV-693

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 19, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

C. S. Hobbs's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal

is DENIED. The medical records do not indicate that prison

personnel knew that Hobbs faced a substantial risk of serious

harm and disregarded that risk by failing to take reasonable

measures to abate it. Farmer v. Brennan, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1984

(1994); Reeves v. Collins, 27 F.3d 174, 176-77 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Hobbs has not demonstrated that there is a genuine issue as to
No.4-20863

-2-

any material fact, and the district court did not err in

concluding that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a

matter of law. See Amburgey v. Corhart Refractories Corp., 936

F.2d 805, 809 (5th Cir. 1991); Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).

 Hobbs can present no legal points arguable on their merits,

and his appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. Rule 42.2.
Exhibit 32.2

SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Speedway
Motorsports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, William R. Brooks, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /S/    WILLIAM R.
BROOKS
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | William R. Brooks Executive
Vice President andChief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be
retained by, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1








                       Consent of Independent Accountants



We have issued our report dated February 16, 2001, covering the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets of Sentigen Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 included in the Annual Report of Sentigen
Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Sentigen Holding Corp. (Registration No.
333-49072).


/s/ Raich Ende Malter & Co. LLP

RAICH ENDE MALTER & CO. LLP
East Meadow, New York
March 28, 2001
EXHIBIT 10.1

                                  Lease Renewal


SPANTER DEVELOPMENTS INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2015 Peel, Suite 1200, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1T8
TEL: (514) 845-2265 FAX: (514) 845-4472


September 8th, 2000

MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.

Att: Mr. Michael Green
43 Riviera Drive, Unit 7
Markham, Ont., L3R 5J6

                                Re: Lease Renewal
                   43 Riviera Drive, Unit #7, Markham, Ontario

Dear Mr. Green:

Further to our discussions, we hereby offer to amend the Lease dated November
14th, 1996 and Lease Renewal dated October 12th, 1999 between Spanter
Developments Inc. and Miad Systems Ltd. in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth below:

1.  Term
    ----

         The term of the Lease shall be amended to be one (1) year commencing on
         the first (1st) day of December, 2000 and ending on the thirtieth
         (30th) day of November, 2001.

2.  Net Rent
    --------

         The Net Rent during the Term of the Lease shall be amended as follows:

         From December 1st, 2000 to November 30th, 2001 - Net rent of
$5.50/square foot.

3.       All other terms and conditions remain the same as per Lease date
November 14th, 1996.

We trust the above meets with your approval and would appreciate you signifying
your acceptance by signing and returning a copy of this letter prior to
September 15th, 2000, 5:00pm, after which time this Offer to Amend the Lease
shall become null and void.


<PAGE>


If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.



Yours very truly,
SPANTER DEVELOPMENTS INC.



/s/ Ronald Mashaal
---------------------------------
Ronald Mashaal



APPROVED AND ACCEPTED, this 27th day of September, 2000


per:     /s/ Michael Green
     -------------------------------------------
         MIAD SYSTEMS LTD.