alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8024 

To extend certain waivers under the WIC program during the COVID– 

19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 11, 2020 

Ms. SCHRIER (for herself and Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To extend certain waivers under the WIC program during 

the COVID–19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘WIC Waiver Extension 

5 Act of 2020’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8024 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PHYSICAL PRESENCE WAIVER 

2 UNDER WIC DURING CERTAIN PUBLIC 

3 HEALTH EMERGENCIES. 

4 Section 2203 of the Families First Coronavirus Re5 sponse Act (Public Law 116–127; 42 U.S.C. 1786 note) 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘any por8 tion’’ and all that follows through the period at the 

9 end and inserting ‘‘the qualified emergency period 

10 described in subsection (c)(1).’’; and 

11 (2) by amending subsection (c) to read as fol12 lows: 

13 ‘‘(c) APPLICABILITY.— 

14 ‘‘(1) QUALIFIED EMERGENCY PERIOD.—The 

15 qualified emergency period described in this para16 graph is the period— 

17 ‘‘(A) beginning on March 18, 2020; and 

18 ‘‘(B) ending on September 30, 2021. 

19 ‘‘(2) EFFECT OF EXTENSION.—The Secretary 

20 may extend (without further application) a waiver 

21 approved by the Secretary and received by a State 

22 agency under this section before the date of the en23 actment of the WIC Waiver Extension Act of 2020 

24 such that such waiver applies during the qualified 

25 emergency period described in paragraph (1). 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8024 IH

1 ‘‘(3) SUNSET.—The authority under this sec2 tion shall expire on September 30, 2021.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS 

4 WAIVER UNDER WIC. 

5 Section 2204 of the Families First Coronavirus Re6 sponse Act (Public Law 116–127) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘September 

8 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2021’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(d) EFFECT OF EXTENSION.—The Secretary of Ag11 riculture may extend (without further application) a waiv12 er approved by the Secretary of Agriculture and received 

13 by a State agency under this section before the date of 

14 the enactment of the WIC Waiver Extension Act of 2020 

15 such that such waiver applies until September 30, 2021.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 16, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 16, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0082. BERNADETTE BIVENS v. MICHELE SHELLIE LEE et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

STCV2000148 STCV1900234 STCV2000147
260 La. 105

#### Milford R. RAYBORN, Sr., et al. v. John D. SMILEY, d/b/a Modern Rendering Company, et al.

No. 51941.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 7, 1971.

In re: Gulf South Products, Inc., d/b/a Modern Rendering Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 253 So.2d 664.

Writ denied. Under the statement of fact by the Court of Appeal, we cannot say the result is incorrect.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13063]



[[Page 28449]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Spectrum Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 14, 2018, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Spectrum Consortium 
(``NSC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Peraton Inc., Herndon, VA; Colorado Engineering Inc., 
Colorado, CO; and General Dynamics SATCOM Technologies, Inc., State 
College, PA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; University of 
Dayton, Dayton, OH; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Cloud Front 
Group, Inc., Reston, VA; EMC Corporation, McLean, VA; NEBENS, LLC, Deer 
Park, IL; Digital Global Systems, Beltsville, MD; and Charles River 
Analytics Inc., Cambridge, MA, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NSC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 24, 2014, NSC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 
4, 2014 (79 FR 65424).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 16, 
2018. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 6, 2018 (83 FR 9544).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-13063 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1345 TP 15-00842**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KWESI NOBLE, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. KOCH OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M. Mohun, A.J.], entered May 13, 2015) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the amended petition is dismissed.

Entered: December 23, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5

<LEGEND>    This schedule contains summary financial information extracted for
            the 3 months ending December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its 
            entirety by reference to such 10Q and is qualified in its entirety 
            by reference to such 10-K.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                           OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                   28,276
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,830,307
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              3,371,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         5,602,155
<PP&E>                                   6,347,895
<DEPRECIATION>                           4,873,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           7,105,697
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    3,053,599
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 3,796,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              6,878
<OTHER-SE>                               (268,255)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             7,105,697
<SALES>                                  3,098,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         3,098,185
<CGS>                                    2,169,291
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,169,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         549,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       66,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          313,570
<INCOME-TAX>                             125,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      188,139
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             188,139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            $0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                            $0.12
        



</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
 AGENCY: Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
 ACTION: Notice and opportunity for public comment.
 SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) has received petitions for certification of eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance from the firms listed below. Accordingly, EDA has initiated investigations to determine whether increased imports into the United States of articles like or directly competitive with those produced by each of the firms contributed importantly to the total or partial separation of the firms' workers, or threat thereof, and to a decrease in sales or production of each petitioning firm.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  List of Petitions Received by EDA for Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance
[05/23/2018 through 06/12/2018]
Firm name
Firm address
Date accepted for
                             investigation
Product(s)Zephyr Products, Inc
3030 Wilson Avenue, Leavenworth, KS 66048
6/7/2018
The firm manufactures custom metal fabrications of stainless steel, carbon steel, aluminum, and other metals.CAMtek, Inc
2402 East Empire Street, Bloomington, IL 61704
6/8/2018
The firm manufactures circuit cards and other electro-mechanical assemblies.Diagnostic Instruments, Inc. d/b/a SPOT Imaging Solutions
6540 Burroughs Avenue, Sterling Heights, MI 48314
6/12/2018
The firm manufactures imaging solutions for life sciences markets, such as microscope digital cameras and microscope boom stands.Lederle Machine Company
830 Jefferson Street, Pacific, MO 63069
6/12/2018
The firm manufactures tool and die products made of steel.
 Any party having a substantial interest in these proceedings may request a public hearing on the matter. A written request for a hearing must be submitted to the Trade Adjustment Assistance Division, Room 71030, Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230, no later than ten (10) calendar days following publication of this notice. These petitions are received pursuant to section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Please follow the requirements set forth in EDA's regulations at 13 CFR 315.9 for procedures to request a public hearing. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance official number and title for the program under which these petitions are submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment Assistance for Firms. Irette Patterson, Program Analyst.


[FR Doc. 2018-13130 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-WH-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,718,637
<SECURITIES>                                 1,277,075
<RECEIVABLES>                                  499,379
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    640,313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,291,649
<PP&E>                                         884,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                 845,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,299,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          421,543
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        793
<COMMON>                                        13,128
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,863,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,299,126
<SALES>                                      2,552,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,562,552
<CGS>                                        1,363,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,210,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (96,217)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                448,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (87,986)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            360,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   360,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
#### Leroy WIENER, Appellant, v. Tito CACACE, Sr., Appellee.

No. 77-2662.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 26, 1978.

Berkell & Strauss and Wesley A. Lauer, Miami, for appellant.

Riskin & Dishowitz and Martin R. Dishowitz, Hollywood, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Huwer v. Huwer,*175 So.2d 242 (Fla.2d DCA 1965); *Highlands Lakes, Inc. v. Art*Present Real Estate, Inc., 147 So.2d 348 (Fla.3d DCA 1962).
#### Jim FAIR, Ind. and of class, Petitioner, v. Ralph DAVIS, Executive Director of Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, et al., Respondents.

No. U-139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 4, 1973.

*378Jim Fair, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for respondents.

SPECTOR, Judge.

Petitioner has filed what purports to be a petition for writ of mandamus whereby he seeks the issuance of a writ commanding the respondent Ralph Davis, Executive Director of the Department of Public Safety to issue an automobile driver’s license to petitioner.

The petitioner alleges that subsequent to being adjudicated incompetent, he was duly and legally restored to competency status.

Now that petitioner’s competency has been legally established as a matter of law, a status that is merely presumed as to other citizens, petitioner seeks the restoration of his driver’s license which was lawfully suspended on the occasion of his incompetency adjudication. The authority to suspend a driver’s license upon such adjudication is found in Section 322.27, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., and Section 322.27(1) (c). Such licenses may not initially be issued to persons who have been adjudicated incompetent and not yet restored to competency. Section 322.05(5), Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

Although petitioner seeks restoration of his driver’s license, he has not alleged that he has applied for the issuance thereof with the state agency authorized by law to do so. Nor does petitioner allege that he has successfully passed the driver’s license examination prescribed by Section 322.29, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

 Mandamus is a remedy by which administrative officials or agencies may be coerced to perform ministerial duties which they have a clear legal duty to perform. That remedy will not lie in absence of a showing that the administrative official has refused to perform the duty sought to be coerced upon application or request made therefor in accordance with the laws which establish or create the duty which is sought to be coerced. A recognized exception to the requirement that application be made with the administrative official or agency is where it can be shown that it would be fruitless and of no avail to apply to the administrative official or agency for the relief sought. In such latter cases, the law will not require the performance of useless acts. Miami Beach v. Sunset Islands 3 & 4 Property Owners Association, 216 So.2d 509 (Fla.App. 1968).

No allegations or showings are made in the petition before us that petitioner has applied to the respondent for his license in the manner and subject to the conditions provided by law.

Accordingly, mandamus will not lie and the petition must be denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON, J., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-31101

Conference Calendar

 

JUVENTINO MUNOZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LORETTA WHYTE, Clerk, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of

Louisiana; CHARLES R. FULBRUGE, III, Clerk, U.S. Court of

Appeals, Fifth Circuit,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana 

USDC No. 96-CV-2309-K

- - - - - - - - - -

August 27, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Juventino Munoz (Louisiana prisoner # 352797) has filed a

motion for permission to appeal, in forma pauperis (IFP), the

district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his complaint

alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962. 
No. 98-31101

-2-

 Munoz is BARRED by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from proceeding IFP

because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, he

has brought an action or appeal in a United States Court that was

dismissed for frivolousness, for maliciousness, or for failure to

state a claim for which relief could be granted and because he

has not established that he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th

Cir. 1996); Munoz v. Jambon, 94-CV-4192-J (E.D. La.; Feb. 10,

1995), aff’d, No. 95-31304 (5th Cir.; Aug. 21, 1996); Munoz v.

Simone, CA-95-2559-L (E.D. La.; Oct. 30, 1995), aff’d, No. 95-

31143 (5th Cir.; Aug. 20, 1996); Munoz v. Garrison, 95-CV-1691

(M.D. La.; Jan. 28, 1997). 

 Accordingly, Munoz’s motion for IFP is DENIED and his appeal

is DISMISSED. Should he wish to reinstate his appeal, Munoz has

15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate

filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court. 

 IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 07, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 07, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0153. SHARON ALLEN v. JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

21SV00355
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 119 (Wednesday, June 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28626]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13226]



[[Page 28626]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Request for Information on Technologies to Support 
Operations in the Information Environment

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice; registration website available.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice for Request for Information on Technologies to 
Support Operations in the Information Environment published in the 
Federal Register on Wednesday, May 23, 2018, did not request 
participants to register online. This notice publicizes the 
registration website: http://www.cvent.com/d/mgqsvs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth K. Bowman, Telephone (410) 
278-55924.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-13226 Filed 6-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-03-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5  
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1996
<CASH>                                             4,374
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    171,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                       3,178
<INVENTORY>                                       28,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 208,915
<PP&E>                                         2,671,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,473,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,450,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            212,101
<BONDS>                                          436,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          16,250
<OTHER-SE>                                       594,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,450,534
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 610,403
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    353,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                22,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  148,053
<INCOME-TAX>                                      56,038
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               92,015
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      92,015
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00
        

</TABLE>