alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 10444]


Notice of Receipt of Request From the Government of the People's 
Democratic Republic of Algeria Under Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO 
Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit 
Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice of receipt of request from Algeria for cultural 
property protection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Foster, Cultural Heritage 
Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs: 202-632-6301; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4d7c1d8c4c6dbc4f4c7c0d5c0d19ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ceff9e0fcfee3fcccfff8edf8e9a2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Government of Algeria has made a request 
to the Government of the United States under Article 9 of the 1970 
UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the 
Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. 
The United States Department of State received this request on February 
27, 2018. Algeria's request seeks U.S. import restrictions on 
archaeological and ethnological material representing Algeria's 
cultural patrimony. Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant 
Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant 
to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), notification of the request is hereby 
published. A public summary of Algeria's request and information about 
U.S. implementation of the 1970 UNESCO Convention will be available at 
the Cultural Heritage Center website: http://culturalheritage.state.gov.

Marie Therese Porter Royce,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-12677 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
[LAWRENCE SAVINGS BANK LETTERHEAD]

May 25, 2000

Mr. Robert P. Perreault
30 Riverview Avenue
Methuen, MA  01844

Dear Bob:

Your special termination agreement dated May 9, 1986 is hereby amended as
follows:

     Section 2 Change in Control, line 15 - "twenty-five percent (25%)" is
     hereby stricken and fifteen percent (15%) is inserted in its place.

                                   Execution
Upon execution below by all parties, this Agreement will enter in full force
and effect on the effective date below:

LAWRENCE SAVINGS BANK

/s/ THOMAS J. BURKE                     /s/ ROBERT P. PERREAULT
---------------------------------       -----------------------------------
Thomas J. Burke, Chairman               Robert P. Perreault

/s/ EUGENE A. BELIVEAU                       5-25-00
---------------------------------       -----------------------------------
Eugene A. Beliveau                      Effective Date

/s/ KATHLEEN I. BOSHAR
---------------------------------
Kathleen I. Boshar

/s/ MALCOLM W. BRAWN
---------------------------------
Malcolm W. Brawn

/s/ BYRON R. CLEVELAND, JR.
---------------------------------
Byron R. Cleveland, Jr.

/s/ NEIL H. CULLEN
---------------------------------
Neil H. Cullen

/s/ RICHARD HART HARRINGTON
---------------------------------
Richard Hart Harrington

/s/ ROBERT F. HATEM
---------------------------------
Robert F. Hatem

/s/ MARSHA A. MCDONOUGH
---------------------------------
Marsha A. McDonough

/s/ PAUL A. MILLER
---------------------------------
Paul A. Miller
Exhibit 32.21st FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION135 EAST TUGALO STREETP.O. BOX 880TOCCOA, GEORGIA  30577TELEPHONE:  (706) 886-7571August 13, 2019Re:Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Ladies and Gentlemen:Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the quarterly report of 1st Franklin Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-Q on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, that, to such officer’s knowledge:(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report./s/ A. Roger GuimondName:  A. Roger GuimondTitle:  Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICEROF FOREST OIL CORPORATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and in connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that is being filed concurrently withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned officer of Forest Oil Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                   | /s/ DAVID H.  KEYTE       |
|-------------------|---------------------------|
| May 10, 2006 | David H. Keyte            |
|              | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
AFS

- 13

- 294

- E May 16, 2013

Exemption No. 10770

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 030 8

Mr. Stephen Wright

Parent of Luke Wright

8671 Open Meadow Way

Columbia, MD 21045

Dear Mr. Wright :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The Basis for O ur Decision

By letter received March 23 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administrat ion (FAA)

on behalf of Luke Wright for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. That exemp tion , if granted, w ould allow Luke to exceed the

specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by

AmSafe Corporation ) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exem ption would not set a precedent and any

delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Luke

.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that numerous p eople with physical challenges had previously completed flights using

restraint systems tha t addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition , if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint s ystems by

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the

situation you present ; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority containe d in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Luke Wright e xemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)

. In

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating u nder part 121 while Luke is aboard

its aircraft is gra n ted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow

Luke to use an FAA

- approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted w ith at least one of Luke ’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him

. Luke Wright may only occupy a passenger seat with no

passenger se ated behind him

. In addition, Luke ’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on May 31 , 2018 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

Enclosure
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8047 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to prohibit an acting Inspector 

General from serving in more than one position in the Federal Government. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 14, 2020 

Mr. KEATING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 to prohibit 

an acting Inspector General from serving in more than 

one position in the Federal Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Demanding Uncondi5 tional Accountability under the Law for Inspectors Gen6 eral Act’’ or the ‘‘DUAL IG Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DUAL ROLE FOR ACTING INSPEC8 TORS GENERAL. 

9 The Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

10 is amended in section 3 by adding at the end the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8047 IH

1 ‘‘(h) In the event of a vacancy in the position of any 

2 Inspector General appointed by the President, by and with 

3 the advice and consent of the Senate, an acting Inspector 

4 General performing the functions and duties of such va5 cant position may not perform the functions and duties 

6 of any other position within the Government.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Jesse Joseph TAFERO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-529.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1971.

*471Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, Before PEARSON, C. J., and JJ-

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty by a jury of (1) assault with intent to commit rape; (2) committing a crime against nature; (3) entering without breaking with intent to commit robbery; (4) robbery. After judgment and sentence his appeal was filed in this court and the judgment and sentence were affirmed. See Tafero v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 564. A petition for certiorari was filed in the Supreme Court of Florida and denied by that court. Thereafter he filed a motion to vacate the judgment and sentence and an amended motion to vacate pursuant to Fla. CrPR 1.-850, 33 F.S.A. The trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the motion to vacate. The court denied the motion and entered an extensive order considering the several contentions advanced by the appellant. This appeal is from that order.

Appellant’s single point presented states only that the trial court erred in denying the motion. He urges first that his constitutional rights were violated at the police line-up where he was not afforded counsel. This point was discussed in the opinion which denied the first appeal. There should be an end to litigation. See Faulkner v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 441.

Appellant’s next point argues that the information was defective in that it was improperly sworn to. The trial court cited Champlin v. State, Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 412 in denying the motion. See also Bretti v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 527.

Appellant also urges that at his trial the court did not properly instruct the jury upon a lesser included offense. Appellant was represented at trial and upon appeal of the judgment by privately employed counsel. He may not now use a motion pursuant to Fla. CrPR 1.850 as a substitute for appeal. Peterson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 223.

Finally appellant argues that the form of the verdict which says “Entering Without Breaking an Apartment Dwelling” was improper. The trial judge noted that the record does not show an objection to the form of the verdict and that the record does reflect a proper adjudication. This argument is one which if available at all should have been presented upon an appeal from the judgment and sentence. Appellant was afforded a fair trial and a violation of a constitutional right has not been shown.

Affirmed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8031 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the maximum term 

of imprisonment for rioting, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 14, 2020 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. BABIN, Mr. ROY, 

Mr. COOK, Mr. LONG, Mrs. HARTZLER, and Mr. ESTES) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum term of imprisonment for rioting, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘David Dorn Act of 

5 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR RIOTING. 

7 Section 2101(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘Shall be fined under this title, or 

9 imprisoned not more than five years, or both’’ and insertVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:34 Sep 03, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8031.IH H8031

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8031 IH

1 ing ‘‘Shall be fined under this title, but in no event less 

2 than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than ten years, or 

3 both’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Stanford DRAPER v. HOTOPHIA CREEK GRAVEL CO. and U. S. F. & G. Co.

No. 45702.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 16, 1970.

Charles C. Finch, D. Briggs Smith, Jr., M. Collins Bailey, Batesville, for appellant.

McClure, Fant & McClure, Sardis, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                December 18, 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Frank's Nursery
Crafts, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended November 3, 2002 (the
"Report"), as filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the undersigned, Adam Szopinski, President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of such officer's knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the date first above written.


                                         /s/ Adam Szopinski
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Adam Szopinski
                                         President and Chief Operating Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01565

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01565\01565_Checklist_092910_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01565\01565_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01565\01565_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01565\01565_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01565\01565_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01565\01565_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01565\01565_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01565\01565_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01565\01565_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

01565\Certification Statement Plant ID 01565.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01565\Supporting Documentation\01565_ICR Water Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01565\Supporting Documentation\01565_Signed cover letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01565\Supporting Documentation\01565_Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
RICKS
                         CABARET INTERNATIONAL, INC.
              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

                                                                ----------------
                                                                Is the owner of

THIS  IS  TO  CERTIFY  THAT

FULLY  PAID  AND  NON-ASSESSABLE  SHARES, NO PAR VALUE, OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR
VALUE  $0.01,  OF  RICKS  CABARET  INTERNATIONAL,  INC.  (HEREINAFTER CALLED THE
CORPORATION),  TRANSFERABLE ON THE BOOKS OF THE CORPORATION BY THE HOLDER HEREOF
IN  PERSON  OR  BY  DULY  AUTHORIZED ATTORNEY UPON SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE
PROPERLY  ENDORSED.  THIS  CERTIFICATE  AND  THE  SHARES  REPRESENTED HEREBY ARE
ISSUED  AND  SHALL  BE  HELD  SUBJECT  TO  ALL  THE  PROVISIONS  OF THE RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF THE CORPORATION, AS AMENDED, TO ALL OF WHICH THE
HOLDER,  BY  ACCEPTANCE  HEREOF,  ASSENTS.  THIS  CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID UNTIL
COUNTERSIGNED  BY  THE  TRANSFER  AGENT.


WITNESS  THE  FACSIMILE  SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE FACSIMILE SIGNATURES OF
ITS  DULY  AUTHORIZED  OFFICERS.

                                                                Dated
                                                                     -----------

                                                          Ricks Cabaret
                                                          International, Inc.

      -----------------          [Corporate SEAL]          -----------------
          Secretary                                            President
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-157-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### Raymond W. PIAZZA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HOUSTON FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3765.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 2, 1972.

Rehearing Denied April 18, 1972.

Writ Refused May 25, 1972.

C. Monk Simons, III, New Orleans, and Helm, Jones & Fletcher, by David H. Burrow, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Gold, Hall, Hammill & Little by John F. Simon, Alexandria, for defendants-appel-lees.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and HOOD, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks damages for personal injuries sustained when the automobile which he was driving collided with the left side of a bright, shiny steel tank truck at 9:15 p. m. on a summer evening when the weather was clear and dry. Defendants are the owner of the milk truck and his insurer. We have thoughtfully studied the evidence and conclude that it well supports the District Judge’s finding that plaintiff was contribu-torily negligent. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the plaintiff-appellant.

Affirmed.

SAVOY, J.,

dissents, being of the opinion that the sole cause of the accident was the negligence of the milk driver in blocking the highway.
Exhibit 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
HCIA Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-98328 and No. 33-98330) on Form S-8 of HCIA Inc. of our reports dated January
22, 1998 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of HCIA Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1997 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997 and the
related consolidated financial statement schedule, which reports appear, or are
incorporated by reference, in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of HCIA Inc.

                                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 27, 1998
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

1.       Mental Health Outcomes, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

2.       Horizon Mental Health Management, Inc., a Texas corporation.

3.       HHMC Partners, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

4.       Geriatric Medical Care, Inc., a Tennessee corporation.

5.       Specialty Rehab Management, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

6.       Acorn Behavioral HealthCare Management Corporation, a Pennsylvania
         corporation.

7.       Horizon Behavioral Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation.

8.       FPMBH of Texas, Inc., a Delaware Corporation.

9.       Florida Psychiatric Associates, Inc., a Florida Corporation.

10.      Florida Psychiatric Management, Inc., a Florida Corporation.

11.      ChoiceHealth, Inc., a Colorado Corporation.

12.      Horizon Behavioral Services - Colorado, Inc., a Colorado Corporation.