alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
263 La. 296

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby Milton McALLISTER.

No. 49293.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 26, 1972.

*232William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Hart-ley, Sp. Counsel, Leonard E. Yokum, Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

Autley B. Newton, Hammond, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Bobby Milton McAllister, was convicted of murder, and the death sentence imposed was affirmed by this Court. 253 La. 382, 218 So.2d 305 (1969).

Citing Stewart v. Massachusetts, 408 U.S. 845, 92 S.Ct. 2845, 33 L.Ed.2d 744 (1972), followng Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment herein insofar as it left undisturbed the death penalty imposed and remanded this case to this Court for further proceedings. 408 U.S. 934, 92 S.Ct. 2854, 33 L.Ed.2d 748 (1972).

We construe the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court to require the imposition of a sentence other than death. Cf., State v. Shaffer, 260 La. 605, 257 So.2d 121 (1971) and State v. Duplessis, 260 La. 644, 257 So.2d 135 (1971).

Accordingly, in compliance with the Mandate of the United States Supreme Court, the death sentence imposed upon defendant is annulled and set aside, and the case is remanded to the 21st Judicial District Court with instructions to the trial judge to sentence the defendant to life imprisonment.

Case remanded.
#### Eric Armstrong WALTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-797.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 13, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 23, 2017














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











---







Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition





Registrant has reported its results of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 , as described in Registrant's press release dated February 23, 2017 , a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.





Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits





Exhibit No.Document99.1Press release issued by the Registrant dated February 23, 2017.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:February 23, 2017By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
^ PY 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, ^ !: ^^^ 

ComplamanU 

•J 

o9^ 

V, ---

TEXAS ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, oRespondent. 

FA A Docket Na CP09SO0014 

DMS No. FAA-2009-1045 

FAA Case No. 2008SO700389 

JUDGE RICHARD C. GOODWIN 

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.218(0(4), the Texas Army National Guard, Respondent, 

files this Answer to the Motion to Strike, filed by Complainant, Federal Aviation Agency, 

and received by Respondent on January 10, 2011. In support of the Answer, Respondent 

shows as follows: 

Respondent provided a memorandum of authorities (o the Administrative Law Judge 

at the time this matter was heard, on January 5,2011. Petitioner did not object to this action 

during the hearing, or at any other time before filing its motion to strike. Therefore, 

Petitioner has waived any complaint that might have been asserted. 

Page 1 of 3 
2. 

A memorandum of authorities does not fail within the definition of the exclusive 

record, as defined by 14 CFR § 13.230. 

WHEREFORE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Respondent, Texas Army National 

Guard, prays this honorable court deny Complainant's Motion to Strike. 

Respectfully submitted, 

GREG ABBOTT 

Attorney General of Texas 

DANIEL HODGE 

First Assistant Attorney General 

BILL COBB 

Deputy Attorney General for Civil Litigation 

BARBARA B. DEANE 

Chief, Environmental Protection and 

Administrative Law Division. 

MieHAEL C. CR(>WLEY 

Assistant Attorney General 

State Bar No. 05170300 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

ENVIRONMNTL PROTECTION & ADMIN. LAW Div. 

P.O. Box 12548, MC-018 

Austin TX 78711-2548 

Phone: (512)475-4208 

Fax: (512)320-0167 

Michael.crowIey@oag.state.tx.us 

Page 2 of 3 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing instrument has been 

served on this the 13 day of January 2011 on the following counsel of record: 

Hearing Docket Clerk 

FAA, AGC-430, Suite 2W1000 

Wilbur Wright Building 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Gerald A. Ellis, Attorney 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of the Regional Counsel. Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta. Georgia 30320 

Attorney for Complainant 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

DOT, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

MICHAEL C. CROWLEY 

Assistant Attornev/General 

Page 3 of 3
#### Jack SCHWARTZ and Evelyn Schwartz, his wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-721.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
256 La. 821

#### Edward Filmore DARNELL v. Leary TAYLOR et al.

No. 50714.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1970.

In re: Edward Filmore Darnell applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 236 So.2d 57.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error in its judgment.
#### Sanford TURNER, Appellant, v. Phyllis TURNER, Appellee.

No. 72-1079.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000046

17-DEC-2014

09:28 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       74,585
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          11,900
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,227
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,807
<COMMON>                                         2,399
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       11,423
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             14,991
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  27,419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            23,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               4,800
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  34,488
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   90,807
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       57,471
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             1,304
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      15,481
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      52,945
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          4,526
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  16
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   4,542
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,120
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,422
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         21
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    2,401
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,394
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,677
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           9,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80
        

</TABLE>
|Exhibit 10(c)                                  
|-----------------------------------------------
|FPL GROUP, INC.                                
|2006 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY
|                                               
|                                               
|Annual Retainer                                
|(payable quarterly in common stock or cash)    
|                                               
|Board or Committee meeting fee                 
|                                               
|Audit Committee Chair retainer (annual)        
|(payable quarterly)                            
|                                               
|Other Committee Chair retainer (annual)        
|(payable quarterly)                            
|                                               
|Annual grant of common stock                   
|(under Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan)      
|                                               
|                                               
|                                               
|                                               
|Miscellaneous                                  
|                                               
|                                               
|                                               
|                                               
|                                               
|                                               
|
Transmission Cover Sheet

To:

City/County

Board of Elections

Fax Number

City

State

From:

Last Name

First Name

Middle Name

Telephone Number

Fax Number

Email Address

Number of pages being transmitted, including this sheet:

         Not all forms can be sent electronically. Please check the FVAP.gov

website or the Voting Assistance Guide to verify which forms can be sent

electronically to your Election Official.

Fax: Send directly to your Election Official. If you are unable and need fax

assistance send to: 703‐693‐5527/DSN 223‐5527 or 1‐800‐368‐8683 or   

check FVAP.gov for international fax numbers.  If you need to fax and do not

have access to a fax machine you can email your forms to fax@fvap.gov.

Email: If your forms can be emailed, DO NOT USE FAX@FVAP.GOV.  

Email them directly to your election official.  Email addresses for your election

official can be found at FVAP.gov.

If a VOTED BALLOT is being faxed or emailed, sign below:

“I understand that by faxing or emailing my voted ballot I am voluntarily waiving my right to a secret ballot”

Signature: Date: 

AdditionalInformation:
----

UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington D.C. 20549FORM 10-QQUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2001

Commission File Number 0-2604

GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)**36-0887470(I.R.S. employer identification No.)**Delaware(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)**One GBC Plaza,Northbrook, Illinois  60062(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)         **(847)  272-3700(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes    X  No ____

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the close of the latest practicable date.
****                              Outstanding at****Class**July 31, 2001
Common Stock,  $.125 par value
13,377,432
Class B Common Stock, $.125 par value
2,398,275
 
**GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION AND**SUBSIDIARIESFORM 10-QFor the Quarter Ended June 30, 2001Table of Contents**

 
    **PART I.**Financial Information 
Page    
Item 1.
Financial statements (unaudited)       
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as ofJune 30, 2001 and December 31,2000 ********************
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 1/27/2023 | DOCUMENT NO. 606785 | Page 1 of 1 | PUBLIC

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., )

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., )

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER GRANTING SECOND AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On January 26, 2023, non-party Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC (“SIE”) filed a 

second motion to extend the time for it to file a motion to quash or to limit a subpoena served on 

SIE by Respondent Microsoft Corp. (“Microsoft”) (“Motion”). SIE represents that Microsoft 

agrees with the relief requested in the Motion. 

Upon review and consideration of the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that SIE’s deadline to file a motion to quash or to limit Microsoft’s subpoena is 

extended to February 1, 2023. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: January 27, 2023
263 La. 800

#### Grace Agnes CORNISH et al. v. KINDER CANAL COMPANY et al.

No. 53000.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 5, 1972.

In re: Josephine S. Bosworth, Thelma A. Briggs, John F. Edwards, F. T. Fletcher, John I. Fossett, Hugh Gaidry, Reed Gaidry, A. J. Gaidry, Jr., Dewitt A. Higgs, Geraldine G. Koch, Henry Pitts Mack, William E. Sommer, John P. Navarre and Alfred R. Ryder applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Allen. 267 So.2d 625.

Not considered. Not timely filed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8072 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit an election official 

from transmitting a ballot to an individual by mail for an election 

for Federal office unless the official certifies to the chief State election 

official that the individual is eligible to vote in the election. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 18, 2020 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to prohibit 

an election official from transmitting a ballot to an individual by mail for an election for Federal office unless 

the official certifies to the chief State election official 

that the individual is eligible to vote in the election. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Integrity of Our Elec5 tions Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8072 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING TRANSMISSION BY MAIL OF BALLOTS 

2 FOR ELECTIONS TO INDIVIDUALS NOT CER3 TIFIED AS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN ELECTION. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 302 of the Help America 

5 Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21082) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub7 section (e); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol9 lowing new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(d) PROHIBITING TRANSMISSION BY MAIL OF BAL11 LOTS FOR ELECTION TO INDIVIDUALS NOT CERTIFIED AS

12 ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN ELECTION.— 

13 ‘‘(1) PROHIBITION.—An election official may 

14 not transmit a ballot to an individual by mail for an 

15 election for Federal office unless the official certifies 

16 to the chief State election official that the individual 

17 is eligible to vote in the election. 

18 ‘‘(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Paragraph (1) shall 

19 apply with respect to any election occurring after the 

20 date of the enactment of the Integrity of Our Elec21 tions Act.’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 302(e) of 

23 such Act (52 U.S.C. 21082(e)), as redesignated by sub24 section (a), is amended by striking ‘‘Each State’’ and inVerDate Sep 11 2014 20:03 Sep 05, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8072.IH H8072

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8072 IH

1 serting ‘‘Except as provided in subsection (d), each 

2 State’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Grace BREWER, Appellant, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. L-291.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Dec. 18, 1969.

Kinsey, Vincent & Pyle, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert Abraham, of Raymond, Wilson, Karl, Conway & Barr, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an award for damages in an eminent domain proceeding. The court has carefully considered the points raised by appellant in her brief and in oral argument before the court and finds them to be without merit. A review of the record fails to reveal the occurrence of error in the manner in which the case was tried below. The amount awarded as damages by the jury was supported by competent evidence, and we are not inclined to substitute our judgment for that of the jury. Eastern Shopping Centers, Inc. v. State Road Department, 192 So.2d 785 (Fla.App.2d 1966).

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
c,\EZChrom Elite\Methods\MWD - Waters 515 Polystyrene Stds.met 

c,\EZChrom Elite\Data\13519-1 

Page 1 of 18 
Page 2 of 18 
Page 3 of 18 
Page 4 of 18 
Page 5 of 18 
Page 6 of 18 
Page 7 of 18 
Page 8 of 18 
Page 9 of 18 
Page 10 of 18 
Page 11 of 18 
Page 12 of 18 
Page 13 of 18 
Page 14 of 18 
Page 15 of 18 
Page 16 of 18 
Page 17 of 18 
Page 18 of 18 
Method: C:\EZChrom Elite\Methods\MWD - Waters 515 Polystyrene Stds.met 

Channel:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2617
DUREMEA ANN BUGGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LARRY ALEXANDER BUGGS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (MISC-95-77-5-BR) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Duremea Ann Buggs, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissingher complaint for child support and alimony and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Buggs v. Buggs , No. MISC-95-77-5-BR (E.D.N.C. July 31, 1995; Aug. 17, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Nestor GONZALES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1971.

Louis Vernell, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Eizenman v. State, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 763; Spataro v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 873; Betancourt v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 124.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Henry Allen SCHULKIN, Relator, v. Honorable Murray GOODMAN, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-1497.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 2, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition denied.
#### Jesus A. AVILIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-595.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 11, 1973.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and William Bassett, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William W. Herring, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge.

This appeal is from the Court of Record of Broward County, Florida. The appellant was convicted on each count of a four-count information charging receiving stolen property, to-wit: (Count 1) airline tickets of Hart Travel Agency, Inc., (Count 2) travelers checks of Travel Plans, Inc., (Count 3) checks of GAC Finance Corporation of Miami, and (Count 4) check of Atlantic Loan Company of North Dade.

The appellant invoked the defense of entrapment and the question raised is whether the evidence shows, as a matter of law, that there was entrapment. The record shows that there was conflicting evidence as to the issue of entrapment and also that there was sufficient evidence not only to submit the issue to the jury but also to support the verdicts.

The trial judge correctly stated that the four offenses set out in the information were in fact one offense of receiving stolen property. Though the property was owned by different entities, the offense was by the same person, at the same time, in the same place, under the same circumstances and *299with the same intent. (Russell v. State, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So.2d 801.)

There is no reversible error in the ultimate result of the action by the trial judge, but since there is only one offense there can be only one adjudication and one sentence.

This cause is affirmed and remanded to the trial court with directions to impose and enter a judgment and sentence for the single offense of unlawfully receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property as charged.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.