alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 20.1

                              SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                              Contact:  Howard F. Curd
                              Chairman of the Board of Directors
                              (972) 690-5888

                                            FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
                                            ---------------------


                 SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS ANNOUNCES
                  NASDAQ COMMON STOCK DELISTING
                                
        STOCK ELIGIBLE TO TRADE ON THE OTC-BULLETIN BOARD

     Dallas,  Texas,  November 11, 1997 -- SA Telecommunications,
Inc. (Nasdaq-STEL), a full-service regional interexhange carrier,
announced  today  that  its Common Stock was  delisted  from  The
Nasdaq  Stock  Market, Inc.'s SmallCap Market  effective  on  the
close  of business on November 11, 1997.  The Company anticipates
that  transactions in the Company's Common Stock will be reported
on  the  OTC-Bulletin Board service for use by  NASD  members  to
reflect quotations in non-Nasdaq securities.  Quotations  in  the
Common  Stock  could  thereafter be reported on  such  electronic
bulletin  board or in what is commonly referred to as  the  "pink
sheets"  published by the National Quotations Bureau  established
for securities that do not meet the Nasdaq listing requirements.

     A  Nasdaq  hearing  review  committee  determined  that  the
Company  should  not  be given additional  time  to  correct  its
failure  to  maintain capital and surplus of at least  $1,000,000
and  to  maintain a minimum bid price greater than  or  equal  to
$1.00,  or as an alternative, to maintain capital and surplus  of
$2,000,000 and a market value of the public float of $1,000,000.

     SA   Telecommunications,  Inc.  provides  a  wide  range  of
telecommunications  services including:  1+,  800/888,  dedicated
services,  travel  and debit cards and conference  calling.   The
Company  provides the majority of its services over its switching
and  transmission  facilities  on the  regional  network  in  the
contiguous  regions  of  the west, southwest  and  south  central
states.     For    further   information,   please    visit    SA
Telecommunications' Internet home page at http://www.satele.com.
                    
THIS  PRESS  RELEASE CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS  AND  AS
SUCH  INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER
FACTORS  THAT  MAY  CAUSE  THE  ACTUAL  RESULTS,  PERFORMANCE  OR
ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE COMPANY TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.  SOME OF
THE  FACTORS  THAT  MAY CAUSE SUCH MATERIAL DIFFERENCES  ARE  SET
FORTH AS RISK FACTORS DETAILED FROM TIME TO TIME IN THE COMPANY'S
PERIODIC  REPORTS  AND  REGISTRATION STATEMENTS  FILED  WITH  THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 March 4, 2008

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of February 29, 2008, preliminary assets under management totaled
$4.563 billion.  Following is a summary as of February 29, 2008 (in millions):

				         Equity    Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts 	        $   893	      $  120       $ 1,013
Mutual Funds (including sub-advised)      2,922	         155         3,077
Private Investment Funds	   	    473            0           473
                                        -------       ------       -------
Total			       	        $ 4,288       $  275       $ 4,563

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small and Small-Mid Cap         $    562
Large Cap and Select		   1,068
Long-Short		           2,662
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     271
				--------
Total			           4,563


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: March 4, 2008	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
Exhibit 99.2

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



---

I, Gregory D. Newton, as Chief Financial Officer of Cascade Bancorp (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

1.The
  accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
  31, 2002 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
  Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |                                         
|----------------------- |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated:February 24, 2003 |  |  | /s/ Gregory D. Newton                   
|                        |  |  |                                         
|                        |  |  | Gregory D. NewtonChief Financial Officer





---
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 November 5, 2007

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



<PAGE>

Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Registrant has reported its results of operations for the Fiscal Quarter
ended September 30, 2007, as described in Registrant's press release dated
November 5, 2007, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit No.   Document
-----------   --------

99.1          Press release issued by the Registrant dated Novemebr 5, 2007.



                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: November 5, 2007                           By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
#### Felix F. BAKER, Petitioner, v. Jeanne M. BAKER, Respondent.

No. 43438.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 3, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 796.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Michael T. TARVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leonard E. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 6609.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

May 3, 1978.

*1001James B. O’Neill, Zwolle, for plaintiff-appellant.

Davis & Simmons, James Lynn Davis, Many, for plaintiff-appellee.

Lowther & Boone, Wm. R. Boone, Many, for defendant-curator.

Before WATSON, FORET and CUTRER, JJ.

WATSON, Judge.

MOTION TO DISMISS

The plaintiff-appellee, Michael T. Tarver, moves to dismiss the suspensive appeal of the intervenor, Nationwide Financial Corporation. The motion is opposed.

The plaintiff filed suit on an open account resulting in the seizure of defendant’s mobile home under a writ of attachment. Asserting a superior privilege, Nationwide intervened; on January 18, 1978, the trial court signed a final judgment in favor of plaintiff, dismissing Nationwide’s intervention with prejudice. Nationwide then moved for and obtained a “suspensive and devolutive” appeal on January 26, 1978; however, the suspensive appeal bond was not filed until March 10, 1978.

When a case is taken under advisement, the delay for perfecting a suspensive appeal normally commences on the day after the clerk has mailed notice of judgment. LSA-C.C.P. articles 2123 and 1974. However, if an appellant moves for and is granted an appeal prior to service of notice, he is deemed either to have notice or to waive notice. *X*-L *Finance Company v. Hollinger,*185 So.2d 873 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1966); *In re Salmon,*318 So.2d 897 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1975). The delay for perfecting the appeal commences on the date the appellant moves for an appeal.

In the instant case, after waiving notice of judgment by moving for and obtaining an appeal, Nationwide had 30 days from January 26, 1978 within which to furnish security. Since the suspensive appeal bond was not filed until March 10, 1978 (43 days after the appeal was moved for and obtained), we are without jurisdiction to entertain the suspensive appeal. However, the devolutive appeal remains viable.

For the reasons assigned, appellant’s sus-pensive appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost; the devolutive appeal is maintained.

SUSPENSIVE APPEAL DISMISSED.

DEVOLUTIVE APPEAL MAINTAINED.
#### John David SPEIGHTS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 12, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment. For reversal, it is contended that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury as to its responsibility to arrive at a verdict if possible by harmonizing their differences of opinion after the jury had been out for an hour and a half.

We have examined the cases cited by counsel for the parties, and it appears to us that the giving of the questioned instruction was not prejudicial in the circumstances. The giving of said instruction was wholly authorized by the Supreme Court’s decision in Nelson v. State, 148 Fla. 338, 4 So.2d 375. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J, and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Modesta Diamond, Respondent, v Alex M. Diamond, Appellant. (And Another Action.)

[735 NYS2d 542]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (LaTia Martin, J.), entered May 2, 2001, which granted plaintiffs motion for renewal, and, on renewal, granted her application for interim child support, and, sua sponte, awarded her interim attorneys’ fees of $10,000, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to vacate the award of attorneys’ fees, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

*271In these consolidated divorce actions, the motion court properly granted plaintiff leave to renew the motion for interim child support. Since there are no exigent circumstances, the interim support award will not be disturbed (see, *Anonymous v Anonymous,*241 AD2d 353). The sua sponte award of interim attorneys’ fees, however, was not supported by any record documentation establishing services rendered, fees paid, time expenditures or other relevant information (see, Scheinkman, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 14, Domestic Relations Law C:237:4, at 19), and should not have been made, particularly where the motion before the court contained no specific application for the relief granted. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Saxe, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
#### In re ESTATE of John Jefferson A. DAVIS, Deceased.

No. 70-859.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

April 28, 1971.

Guy C. Hill of Heuer & Albury, West Palm Beach, for appellants John Meyer and Ginny Meyer.

Philip G. Newcomm of Shutts & Bowen, Miami, for appellees Pauline D. Hinchliffe and Ervilla A. Rolff.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See in re Zimmerman s Estate, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 560.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
No. 98-51067 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51067 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUCILA DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. P-98-CR-98-2

-------------------- April 12, 2000 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Lucila Dominguez has filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Dominguez and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Dominguez has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the attorney’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED; the attorney is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. r: AA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANlZATlON PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

·u ........ .:1 .~v-N fu-..rr? re .f~JJ va_v; l'hl.::::. 3 / 11/tlo a.h& 7M. VCNY'IDV s 1-h I AJ r..:> J.. I c.;,.~ , 

~ ~Ptf\<1 

0 

Other/ Additional Information:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 79 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or establishment of national monuments in Arizona except by express authorization 

of Congress, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2019 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself and Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or establishment of national monuments in Arizona 

except by express authorization of Congress, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON EXTENSION OR ESTABLISH4 MENT OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN ARI5 ZONA. 

6 Subsection (d) of section 320301 of title 54, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 79 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘OR ARIZONA’’ after ‘‘WYO2 MING’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘or Arizona’’ after ‘‘Wyoming’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### VERNELL v. STATE ex rel. GERSTEIN.

No. 37875.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 212 So.2d 11.
256 La. 817

#### Victor BUSSIE and his wife, Gertrude Foley Bussie v. Mrs. Blanche Revere LONG, James R. Leake and Leo J. Theriot, Members of and The Louisiana Tax Commission.

No. 50703.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1970.

In re: Victor Bussie and his wife, Gertrude Foley Bussie applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 236 So.2d 68.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### John Bernard BENETIN, Appellant, v. Theresa MORGAN, a minor, by her mother and next friend, Elanor Morgan Colon and Elanor Morgan Colon, Individually, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
July 2, 2000



Mr. John Frohling
Frohling, Hudak & Pellegrino
425 Eagle Rock Avenue
Roseland, New Jersey  07068

Dear Mr. Frohling,

This letter will confirm our agreement with respect to your compensation for
ongoing assistance to the Company in connection with its continuing efforts to
locate a governmental entity within the US or Puerto Rico to co-develop and
install a TCS-1 system.

The Company acknowledges that you have already initiated considerable efforts on
this task without compensation and are willing to continue to do so through
2001.

The Company's Board of Directors has authorized me as President to award you
1,200,000 shares of common stock to be issued to you and registered pursuant to
Form S-8. You shall act as an independent contractor in this regard and these
services are separate and apart from any legal services you, your law firm or
any member of Frohling, Hudak & Pellegrino LLC renders. You are authorized not
to charge any of your time on this project, as part of your firm's legal fees
and acknowledge that you have not done so in the past. You shall render two
quarterly reports with the first six (6) months report due July 30, 2001.

We appreciate your assistance.


/s/ JOHN L. THRESHIE JR.
------------------------------
John L. Threshie Jr.
President / CEO

/jfr

c.c.  Michael Ash
# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 07, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19A1972. ALDO CASTILLO-GARCIA v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On May 23, 2019, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than June 03, 2019. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a). Because procedural deficiencies have deprived the appellant of the right of appellate review, the appellant is hereby informed of the following in accordance with Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995): This Court has dismissed your appeal because an enumeration of errors and a brief have not been filed on your behalf as required. If this failure occurred while you were represented by legal counsel and was due to your appellate counsel's failure to perform the duties of appellate counsel, and if you still wish to appeal, you may file a motion in the trial court for permission to pursue an out-of-time appeal. If the trial court grants your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order granting your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence. If the trial court denies your motion for an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the filing date of the order denying your motion to file in the trial court a notice of appeal from that order.Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 07, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant as well as to the appellant's attorney of record, if any. The appellant's attorney is also directed to send a copy of this order to the appellant.