alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Oct-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Nov-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-01-1998
<CASH>                                         3,634
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (623)
<INVENTORY>                                    35,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,352
<PP&E>                                         131,116
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (67,536)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,775
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,622
<OTHER-SE>                                     30,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,481
<SALES>                                        176,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          131,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               43,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             896
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                385
<INCOME-TAX>                                   130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            255
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  23
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                FORM 8-K/A (NO.3)

              Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

         DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED) JUNE 02, 2008

                     ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC
               (EXACT NAME OF COMPANY AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

FLORIDA                                000-30932                   13-4172059
-------                                ---------                   ----------
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION)    (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)       (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION)                                                IDENTIFICATION)


              335 CONNIE CRESCENT, CONCORD, ONTARIO, CANADA L4K 5R2

               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (905) 695-4142

                                       N/A

          (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



|_| Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities
    Act (17 CFR 230.425)

|_| Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange
    Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
    the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

|_| Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
    the Exchange Act (17 CFR 40.13e-4(c))








<PAGE>


ITEM 1.01 ENTRY INTO A MATERIAL DEFINITIVE AGREEMENT

Effective August 26, 2008 the Issuer (the "Company") completed a draw down of
the sum of $68,000 under it's previously reported Credit Facility Agreement
("Facility" or "Agreement") with Mr. Bengt Odner a director and shareholder of
the Company. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company requested a draw down under
the Facility of $68,000 for general working capital purposes. The draw down
under the facility was approved and provided by Mr. Odner.

With the completion of the most recent draw down under the Facility; a total of
$1,018,000 has been drawn down under the Facility and received by the Company
for use for general working capital. The sums received by the Company in
connection with the draw downs are represented by 9% unsecured subordinated
demand promissory notes issued by the Company pursuant to the Facility.


 ITEM 2.03 CREATION OF A DIRECT FINANCIAL OBLIGATION OR AN OBLIGATION UNDER AN
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENT OF A REGISTRANT

See Item 1.01 above.




                                     ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE INC.

Date: September 02, 2008
                                     By:  /s/ DAVID J. JOHNSON
                                           -------------------------------------
                                             David J. Johnson Chief Executive
                                             Officer and President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,191
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,406
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,410
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        398,993
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,270
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 455,050
<DEPOSITS>                                     386,155
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,215
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,408
<LONG-TERM>                                     24,076
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,097
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 455,050
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,720
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  600
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   345
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,665
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,238
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,214
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,451
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  45
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,862
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,862
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,615
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.13
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,695
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,630
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,600
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (533)
<RECOVERIES>                                        78
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,270
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,270
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,192
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,753
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      553
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,313
<PP&E>                                          24,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,229)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,629
<SALES>                                          1,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,165
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (763)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William J. GUSTE, Jr., Attorney General v. The AUDUBON PARK COMMISSION and the City of New Orleans.

No. 61638.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana ex rel. William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 355 So.2d 984.

Denied.

MARCUS, J.,

would grant the writ being of the opinion that a serious question is raised as to whether the zoo expansion plan would change the character and nature of Audubon Park.

SUMMERS, J., would grant.
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

July 7, 2014

Amanda Wait, Esq.

Hunton & Williams LLP

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

Re: In the Matter of Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc., 

Docket No. C-4423

Dear Ms. Wait:

This is in reference to the Petition For Approval of Proposed Divestiture filed by Service 

Corporation International (“SCI”) and received on April 2, 2014 (“Petition”). Pursuant to the 

Decision and Order in Docket No. C-4423, SCI requests prior Commission approval of its 

proposal to divest certain assets to Rollings Funeral Service, Inc. (“Rollings”).

After consideration of SCI’s Petition and other available information, the Commission 

has determined to approve the proposed divestiture as set forth in the Petition. In according its 

approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and the representations 

made by SCI and Rollings in connection with SCI’s Petition and has assumed them to be 

accurate and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Paul Houston
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Versant Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Wong, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jerry Wong Jerry Wong
Chief Financial Officer
January 29, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### CARBERRY v. FOLEY.

No. 38036.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 213 So.2d 635.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 27168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11344]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements filed the week ending April 23, 
2011

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0082.
    Date Filed: April 20, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: CSC/33/Meet/008/2011 dated 19 April 2011 Expedited Finally 
Adopted Resolution 656 and Recommended Practices 1630 and 1677.

    Intended effective date: 1 July 2011.
Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-11344 Filed 5-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Jack Walton SPARKS, Appellee.

No. 70-113.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1971.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and John A. Zebedee, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellant.

N. S. Gould, of Phillips, McFarland, Gould & Korones, Clearwater, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on authority of State v. Smith, 241 So.2d 728, decided by this Court on December 4, 1970.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

MANN, J., dissents.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Melvin D. FORD.

No. 61578.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 13, 1978.

In re: Melvin D. Ford applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus. Orleans Parish.

Writ Granted. Revocation of probation reversed. That portion of defendant’s sentence requiring payment of $500 to Appellate Process Fund is annulled and set aside. Case remanded to the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans for correction of the sentence by making the sum payable to the District Attorney of Orleans Parish in accordance with law. *See, State v. Rugon,*355 So.2d 876 (La.1977).
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Frank CLARK, III, Respondent.

No. 53642.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 31, 1978.

See also, Fla., 323 So.2d 579.

James P. Hollaway, Asst. Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Frank Clark, III, in pro. per., for respondent.

*864PER CURIAM.

Respondent, a suspended member of The Florida Bar,* seeks reinstatement to the active practice of law pursuant to the Florida Bar Integration Rule, Article XI, Rule 11.11. A hearing was held before a Bar referee, who made findings of fact and submitted a report and recommendation. The referee found that respondent has demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that he meets the requirements for reinstatement and has shown his fitness to resume the practice of law. These findings are amply supported by the testimony in the record and are hereby approved and adopted. But the referee, nevertheless, recommended against reinstatement since respondent, having been convicted of a felony in federal court, has not had his civil rights restored. The referee expressed the opinion that it would be an anomalous situation to have an attorney entitled to practice before judges for whom he is not qualified to vote and juries upon which he is not qualified to sit.

Respondent filed a statement in opposition to the referee’s report. He points out that no decision of this Court has held that a suspended attorney who has been convicted of a felony must receive a pardon or restoration of civil rights before being reinstated.

The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has made its recommendation. It urges that we deny the petition, arguing that restoration of civil rights should be a prerequisite to the resumption of the practice of law regardless of whether the disciplined attorney was disbarred or suspended.

It is true that a pardon or restoration of civil rights after a felony conviction has only been held specifically required in cases of first-time applicants and attorneys that have been disbarred. Perhaps the absence of a rule of decision holding such to be necessary for reinstatement of a suspended attorney is due to the fact that disbarment is the more customary form of discipline for a lawyer convicted of a felony. We now hold that restoration of civil rights following a felony conviction is a necessary prerequisite to obtaining the privilege of practicing law, whether one be a suspended attorney, a disbarred attorney, or a first-time applicant for admission to the Bar.

We therefore deny respondent’s request for reinstatement. We do so without prejudice to his right to petition again when his civil rights have been restored, notwithstanding the provision of Rule 11.11(11). Execution is directed to issue for the costs of these proceedings against the respondent in the amount of $14.50.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, HATCH-ETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

ENGLAND, J., dissents.

*

Respondent was suspended November 19, 1975. *The Florida Bar v. Clark,*323 So.2d 579 (Fla.1975).
#### Edward CLAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
AlasConnect is petitioning for exemption under FAA Section 333 for Unmanned Aircraft System

(UAS) under CFR 14 parts 21 subpart H, 91.103(b)(2), 91.105, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.51, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409, and 91.417 . The primary use of the UAS will be for aerial surveying of potential repeater sites for Wireless Internet Service. The UAS to be used is a DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus with a gimbal mounted camera. The total weight of the craft including battery and propellers is 1242g. It is controlled by a handheld remote control at an operating frequency of 5.728GHz

- 5.85GHz with a smart phone used to control the camera operations. The UAS load is never altered. There is no need for any additional equipment or modification of the craft for any surv ey. The weight of the craft is always 1242g. Before surveying any potential site AlasConnect requires that the craft is inspected for any wear to the chassis and propellers, the batteries are charged to maximum capacity, a boundary is determined for the survey. The UAS never leaves the Visual Line of Sight of the Pilot in Command. The maximum height of the UAS is 100ft as that is the maximum height of any future site. Additionally all flights will not exceed a consecutive flight time of 10 minutes. W hen surveying any site AlasConnect will require that there be an adequate clearing for UAS operation. The UAS stays within the boundary of the designated site for the survey at all times. The UAS will keep a boundary of no less than 30ft from any structu re or foliage when surveying to ensure safety of equipment and property. AlasConnect will be proposing that the maximum operating speed of the UAS be 3m/s when surveying any site. This will be to ensure that the PIC can adequately control the UAS. Curr ently AlasConnect has no sites, potential or otherwise, within 2mi of any airports. If there is any site to be surveyed within that range then the local Flight Standards District Office will be consulted

. The public would benefit from AlasConnect receivi ng a Section 333 exemption. By being granted the exemption AlasConnect would be able to quickly assist potential and existing customers by being able to quickly assess new sites and assist in determining if the customer would be able to receive internet s ervice by creating a proper clearing to establish line of site with the nearest repeater site.

Jess Russell System Technician I jor@alasconnect.com 907

-459

-4928 AlasConnect 612 Illinois St Fairbanks, AK 99701
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000037008
<NAME> FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      39,613,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,323,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,936,000
<PP&E>                                     449,926,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             110,692,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             454,458,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,978,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,626,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 176,117,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               454,458,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,122,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,253,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,435,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,256,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,178,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   970,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>