alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.8(a)

                         American Woodmark Corporation

                               Fiscal Year 2001
            Annual Incentive Plan for the Chairman of the Board and
                              the President & CEO


I.   The objectives of the Annual Incentive Plan are threefold:

     A.   Provide an incentive which will encourage and reward outstanding
          individual performance;

     B.   Help align the personal goals of the individual with the overall goals
          of and objectives of American Woodmark and the stockholders of
          American Woodmark; and

     C.   Together with base pay and long term incentive programs, provide a
          compensation package, in both form and total value, which is equal to
          or better than opportunities offered in the competitive marketplace
          for similar performance in similar positions.


II.  Eligibility for Participation in the Annual Incentive Program

     A.   The Chairman and President/CEO of the Company. Eligible participants
          must be employed by the Company on April 30, 2001. All calculations
          will be reduced on a pro-rated basis for eligible participants not
          employed as of May 1, 2000.


III. Determination of Annual Incentive Payout

     A.   Determination of the payout will be based on one component:

          1.   Zero to 110% of base salary on April 30, 2001 as determined by
               the attached schedule for net income. No payment will be made on
               net income below $16.0 million. Net income will be the audited
               amount as listed in the Company's annual report for Fiscal 2001.
#### Carmen Allen RAMONA, Appellant, v. Isabel Maria RAMONA, Appellee.

No. 70-539.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 2, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

See also, 223 So.2d 569.

*548Milton E. Grusmark, and Natalie Baskin, Miami, for appellant.

Carl A. Spatz, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

The husband, Carmen Allen Ramona, appeals from an order dated April 30, 1970 which modified a prior final decree of divorce.

The post decretal order increased the alimony and child support payments due to the wife from the husband; required that they be paid for certain retroactive periods and awarded fees to the wife’s attorney.

On appeal, the husband complains of a lack of “competent material evidence to prove a substantial change” in the circumstances of the wife sufficient to sustain an award increasing the child support and alimony payments.

We have been provided with an insufficient record on appeal to reverse on this point. Cf. Insured Lloyds v. James, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 595 and Coggan v. Coggan, Fla.App.1961, 130 So.2d 131.

The husband challenges the retroactive requirements of the order as it relates to child support and alimony payments.

In one part the order required the husband to make the increased payments of child support and alimony beginning March 1, 1970. The record is unclear as to whether the petition for modification was filed on March 1, 1970 or March 3, 1969. We affirm the retroactive requirements of the order as to the correct date upon which the petition was filed and remand the cause to the trial court for a determination of that date. Alterman v. Alterman, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 472.

Another part of the order required the husband to pay retroactive alimony and child support from October 11, 1968 to March 1, 1970. Under Alterman, supra, we hold this part of the order to be erroneous and reverse.

The husband challenged the award of attorneys’ fees to the attorney for the wife.

The attorneys’ fees were awarded for services rendered to the wife on her petition for modification of the final decree by increasing the alimony and child support payments. Generally, a wife is entitled to attorneys’ fees where proceedings are brought to “enforce” a decree for child support or alimony but not where the proceedings are brought by her for modification of such a decree. 10 Fla.Jur. Divorce, Etc. §§ 148 and 149.

The order is affirmed as to the increase in alimony and child support payments and as to the requirement that those payments be made retroactive until the date upon which the petition for modification was filed; it is remanded to the trial court for a determination and adjudication as to that date; it is reversed as to the requirements for retroactive payments from October 11, 1968 to March 1, 1970 and as to attorneys’ fees.

It is so ordered.
---

EXHIBIT 99.3

CERTIFICATION 
  PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ferdi Dippenaar, Chief Executive Officer of Great Basin Gold
  Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
        fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.                                                                                   



| | By:    | /s/ F. Dippenaar       
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Ferdi Dippenaar        
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 31, 2008         

---
261 La. 229

#### A. S. HOLLIDAY v. Vertie Leeper HOLLIDAY.

No. 52284.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: A. S. Holliday applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. There is no error of law in the judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8207 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8207

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the scope of 
procedural rights of members of the uniformed services with respect to 
   their employment and reemployment rights, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2020

Mr. Cicilline (for himself, Mr. Takano, Mr. Reschenthaler, Mr. Golden, 
Mrs. Davis of California, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, and Mr. Johnson 
 of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the scope of 
procedural rights of members of the uniformed services with respect to 
   their employment and reemployment rights, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Servicemembers Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATIONS REGARDING SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT AND REEMPLOYMENT 
              RIGHTS OF MEMBERS OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES.

    (a) Clarification Regarding Definition of Rights and Benefits.--
Section 4303(2) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(A)'' before ``The term''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(B) Any procedural protections or provisions set forth in 
        this chapter shall also be considered a right or benefit 
        subject to the protection of this chapter.''.
    (b) Clarification Regarding Relation to Other Law and Plans for 
Agreements.--Section 4302 of such title is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(c)(1) Pursuant to this section and the procedural rights 
afforded by subchapter III of this chapter, any agreement to arbitrate 
a claim under this chapter is unenforceable, unless all parties consent 
to arbitration after a complaint on the specific claim has been filed 
in court or with the Merit Systems Protection Board and all parties 
knowingly and voluntarily consent to have that particular claim 
subjected to arbitration.
    ``(2) For purposes of this subsection, consent shall not be 
considered voluntary when a person is required to agree to arbitrate an 
action, complaint, or claim alleging a violation of this chapter as a 
condition of future or continued employment, advancement in employment, 
or receipt of any right or benefit of employment.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Jeffrey P. Orleans, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       ThisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orleans Homebuilders, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | March 1,  2004           |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | Jeffrey P.  Orleans      |   |
|   | Jeffrey P.  Orleans      |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To Board of Directors
PharmaPrint, Inc.


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-78555 and 333-72263)
and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-72255) of our report dated July 14, 2000,
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PharmaPrint, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2000.


                                                CORBIN & WERTZ

Irvine, California
August 16, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 28449)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 14, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Spectrum Consortium (“NSC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Peraton Inc., Herndon, VA; Colorado Engineering Inc., Colorado, CO; and General Dynamics SATCOM Technologies, Inc., State College, PA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; University of Dayton, Dayton, OH; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Cloud Front Group, Inc., Reston, VA; EMC Corporation, McLean, VA; NEBENS, LLC, Deer Park, IL; Digital Global Systems, Beltsville, MD; and Charles River Analytics Inc., Cambridge, MA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NSC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 24, 2014, NSC filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 4, 2014 (79 FR 65424).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 16, 2018. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 6, 2018 (83 FR 9544).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-13063 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1


                         INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF

                              THE STATE OF DELAWARE
No. [[certificatenumber]]                                 ***[[number]]SHARES***

                          [[COLONY RIH HOLDINGS, INC.]]
                            [[TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE
                        COMMON STOCK A, PAR VALUE $0.01]]
This Certifies that [[name]] is the registered holder of ****[[number]]****
Shares of the above named Corporation, fully paid and non-assessable
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person
or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly
endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its duly authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto
affixed this [[date]] day of [[month]] A.D. [[year]]


-----------------------------                      -----------------------------
[[Secretary-Treasurer]]                            [[President]]


<PAGE>


The securities represented by this Certificate may not be transferred, sold,
assigned, hypothecated or otherwise disposed of (a "Transfer") except in
accordance with the provisions of a Stockholders Agreement dated as of
_____________, 2001. Any transferee of these securities takes subject to the
terms of such agreement, a copy of which is on file with the Company.

The securities represented by this Certificate have not been registered under
the Securities Act of 1993 (the "Act") or state securities laws, and no transfer
of these securities may be made except (a) pursuant to an effective registration
statement under the Act, or (b) pursuant to an exemption therefrom with respect
to which the Company may, upon request, require a satisfactory opinion of
counsel for the holder that such transfer is exempt from the requirements of the
Act.

The ownership and transfer of the securities represented by this Certificate are
subject to and restricted by the terms and conditions of a certain Transfer
Restriction Agreement dated _________, 2001. The Corporation will furnish a copy
of Transfer Restriction Agreement without charge to any stockholder on request.

                               * * * * * * * * * *

       For Value Received, ________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
  _________________ Shares represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
 irrevocably constitute and appoint ______________________ Attorney to transfer
     the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full
                     power of substitution in the premises.

           Dated
                  -------------

      In presence of


-----------------------------                      -----------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          23,270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     65,769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               185,600
<PP&E>                                         454,269<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,006,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,218,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,503,126<F2>
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,006,023
<SALES>                                         88,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,024
<CGS>                                           27,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               144,876
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,459,375<F3>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,459,375<F3>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.773)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.773)
<FN>
<F1>EXCLUSIVE OF LAND, PURCHASE RIGHTS, CONCESSIONS AND RELATED CAPITALIZED COSTS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,342,062.
<F2>STATED AND PAID-IN CAPITAL OF $7,859,392 LESS RETAINED DEFICIT OF $3,356,261.
<F3>FOR THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, THERE WAS A LOSS FROM
CONTINUING OPERATIONS OF $223,225 AND A NET LOSS OF $201,041, CONSTITUTING A LOSS
PER SHARE OF 0.104.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Edith R. WELCH, Appellant v. The FRANK A. McBRIDE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 69-720.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      23.1**








**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on Form
      S-8
      (No. 0-18849) of The Female Health Company and Subsidiaries of our report,
      dated
      December 19, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of The Female
      Health Company and Subsidiaries for the year ended September 30,
      2007.








/s/
      McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





Schaumburg,
      Illinois


December
      19, 2007
#### L. C. DUNLAP, Appellant, v. CITIZENS CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York Corporation, and Cover-All Underwriters, Inc., Appellees.

No. 70-552.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 4, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

      DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS TO ACQUIRE ADDITIONAL CELLULAR
                      PROPERTY IN OKLAHOMA

OKLAHOMA CITY,  June  14, 2000-Dobson  Communications Corporation
(Nasdaq:  DCEL)  announced  today that  it  has  entered  into  a
definitive agreement to acquire the FCC cellular license for  and
certain assets related to the Oklahoma 6 Rural Service Area (RSA)
for   approximately   $72.0  million,  subject   to   adjustment.
Completion  of  the  transaction  is  subject  to  corporate  and
regulatory approvals, and customary closing conditions.

     The  Oklahoma  6  RSA covers seven counties in  central  and
eastern  Oklahoma, including the cities of Henryetta,  McAlester,
Muskogee,  Okmulgee, Seminole and Tahlequah.  Bisecting  it  from
west  to  east is the major roaming corridor along Interstate  40
that  connects Oklahoma City to Fort Smith, Arkansas. The  market
also  encompasses much of the Indian Nation Turnpike and  several
recreational  areas,  including Lake Eufaula, one  of  Oklahoma's
largest and most popular lakes.

     Dobson  will gain approximately 25,000 subscribers with  the
acquisition. The total population base for the Oklahoma 6 RSA  is
approximately 221,000.

     "Oklahoma  6 is a  very promising addition to our operations
in  the  Midwest," said Ed Evans, president and  chief  operating
officer. "We believe that the potential subscriber growth in this
region  should  benefit us, particularly  as  we  strengthen  and
expand the availability of digital services."

     Dobson  Communications  is a  leading  provider of  cellular
phone   services   to  rural  markets  in  the   United   States.
Headquartered  in  Oklahoma City, the  Company  owns  or  manages
wireless operations in 18 states, covering a total population  of
8.6  million. For additional information on the Company  and  its
operations, please visit its web site at www.dobson.net.

     This  press release contains forward-looking statements that
are  based upon assumptions that in the future may prove  not  to
have  been accurate. Those statements and the Company's  business
and  prospects  are subject to a number of risks, including,  but
not limited to, substantial capital expenditures required to fund
its  acquisitions, the inability to secure adequate financing  to
fund  the  Company's  continued growth,  competition,  government
regulation  and  the  ability of the  Company  to  implement  and
continue  its  business  strategy.  These  and  other  risks  are
described  in  the  Company's documents and  reports,  which  are
available from the Securities and Exchange Commission.

CONTACT:  J. Warren Henry
          Vice President, Investor Relations
          (405) 529-8820