alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

CertificationFurnished Pursuant to 

18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Financial Corporation (the"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 20, 2006 (the "Report"), theundersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 

-  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
-  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

|                       |  |                                                                                  |
|-----------------------|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |  |
| By:    |  | David W. Mann                                                                    |
|                       |  | David W. Mann

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2007 |

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FirstFinancial Corporation and will be retained by First Financial Corporation. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Annual andQuarterly CertificationsPursuant to Section302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, DavidW. Mann, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First FinancialCorporation;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.            The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)            designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisquarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)            presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;

5.            The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)            all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant'sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.            The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2004 

/s/ David W. MannDavid W. MannChief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 776 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 

Medical Services for Children program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, and Mr. STEWART) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

Emergency Medical Services for Children program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Medical 

5 Services for Children Program Reauthorization Act of 

6 2019’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL 

8 SERVICES FOR CHILDREN PROGRAM. 

9 Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

10 U.S.C. 300w–9(d)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 776 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘2014, and’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2014,’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting before the period the following: 

4 ‘‘, and $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 

5 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

SMALL DUCT, HIGH VELOCITY (SDHV) STANDARDS (EE-RM/STD-02-330)

and

CENTRAL AIR-CONDITIONER TEST PROCEDURE (EE-RM/TP-02-002)

PUBLIC WORKSHOP

General Information

Comment Deadline: January 8, 2003

Address to Submit Comments : CACQ-y,ee.doe.gov

Please reference the appropriate docket number (see header above)

Written Comments: Refer to Federal Register Notice (67 FR 65742, Oct 28, 2002), ADDRESSES

Website: Home page of the Office of Building Technology (previously known as Office of

Codes

and Standards) is

http://wikw.eren.doe. gopv/buildings/codes standards/index.htm

DOE Points of Contact : Michael Raymond (EE-2J), (202) 586-9611

Michael W. Bowers (GC), (202) 586-9140

Crystal Branson, (202) 586-6448

EE-RM/TP-02-002 COMMENT 02CC
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 03-1668 03-1697 GREENLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. AMY N., as parent and next friend of minor daughter, KATIE C.; ROBERT N., as parent and next friend of minor daughter, KATIE C.,

Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 23, 2004 is amended as follows:Page 1, change "Appellee, Cross-Appellant," to PlaintiffAppellee, Cross-Appellant," and "Appellants, Cross-Appellees." to "Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees."
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**

 

AtlantaMotor Speedway, Inc., a Georgia corporation. 

 

Bristol Motor Speedway, Inc., aTennessee corporation. 

 

Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC a/k/a Lowe’s MotorSpeedway at Charlotte (“LMS”), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

 

600 Racing, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of LMS), a North Carolina corporation. 

 

INEX Corporation (a wholly owned subsidiary of LMS), a North Carolina corporation. 

 

Las Vegas Motor Speedway, Inc. (“LVMS”), a Delaware corporation. 

 

Nevada Speedway, LLC d/b/a Las Vegas Motor Speedway (a wholly owned subsidiary of LVMS), a Delaware limited liability company. 

 

Speedway Funding, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of LVMS), a Delaware limited liabilitycompany. 

 

Oil-Chem Research Corporation, an Illinois corporation. 

 

SMI Systems, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company. 

 

SPR, Inc. (“SPR”), a Delaware corporation. 

 

Speedway Properties Company, LLC (“SPC”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), aDelaware limited liability company. 

 

Speedway Media, LLC d/b/a Racing CountryUSA (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPC), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

 

Speedway Sonoma, LLC a/k/a Infineon Raceway (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a Delaware limited liability company. 

 

Speedway Systems, LLC d/b/a SMI Properties (“SMIP”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SPR), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

 

Motorsports by Mail, LLC (a subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolina limited liability company.

 

TSI Management Company, LLC (“TSI”) (a wholly owned subsidiary ofSMIP), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

 

Trackside HoldingCorporation (“THC”) (a wholly owned subsidiary of SMIP), a North Carolina corporation. 

 

SMI Trackside, LLC (a subsidiary of THC), a North Carolina limited liability company. 

 

Texas Motor Speedway, Inc., a Texas corporation.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0409

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

KATHERINE ANNE PROCTOR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 16, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 6 2024

08/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0409
#### Ex parte David L. MARTIN.

77-300.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 24, 1978.

FAULKNER, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
#### DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant, v. GOLDEN PRINCE, INC., et al. (Parcel 138—Estrella Mendel and Emiliano), Appellees.

No. 73-663.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Metropolitan Area,Reports per 100K Population"Dover, DE Metropolitan Statistical Area",609"Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metropolitan Statistical Area",561"Salisbury, MD-DE Metropolitan Statistical Area",483,"This chart identifies Metropolitan Areas (Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas) with a population of 100,000 or more.  Metropolitan areas are defined by Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 15-01, ""Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Delineations of These Areas"" (July 15, 2015).",
#### Joel L. PALMER and Tracy D. Palmer, by and through their parent and next friend, Patricia Palmer, Appellants, v. Chester Lawrence PALMER, Jr., and State Farm General Insurance Co., an Illinois corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James C. Downey, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     In connection with the Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Jack F. Callahan, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.              /s/ JACK F. CALLAHAN, JR.   Jack F. Callahan, Jr.   *Executive Vice President and*
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                   MARCH 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                SAUER INC.                     U.S. CORPORATION          HOLDING COMPANY
                ----------                  -----------------------  -----------------------
<S>                                         <C>                      <C>
Sauer-Sundstrand Company..................  U.S. Corporation         Manufacturing
SUSA Holding of LaSalle County, Inc.......  U.S. Corporation         Real Property Holding
SUSA Holding of Story County, Inc.........  U.S. Corporation         Real Property Holding
SUSA Holding of Stephenson County, Inc....  U.S. Corporation         Real Property Holding
Control Concepts, Inc.....................  U.S. Corporation         Manufacturing
                                                                     Holding Company/General
Hydro-Gear, Inc...........................  U.S. Corporation         Partner
Hydro-Gear Limited Partnership............  U.S. Partnership         Manufacturing
Sauer-Sundstrand SpA......................  Italy Corporation        Manufacturing
Sauer-Sundstrand Ltd......................  U.K. Corporation         Manufacturing
Sauer-Sundstrand GB Ltd...................  U.K. Corporation         Inactive
Sauer-Sundstrand Ltda.....................  Brazil Limited           Sales Company
                                            Liability Company
Sauer-Sundstrand GmbH & Co................  Germany Partnership      Manufacturing
Custom Design Electronics of Sweden AB....  Sweden Corporation       Holding Company
NOB Electronik AB.........................  Sweden Corporation       Manufacturing
Sauer-Sundstrand Benelux BV...............  Netherlands Corporation  Sales Company
Sauer-Sundstrand Benelux NV...............  Belgium Corporation      Sales Company
Sauer-Sundstrand Hydraulique SA...........  France Corporation       Sales Company
Sauer-Sundstrand Svenska AB...............  Sweden Corporation       Sales Company
Sauer-Sundstrand (CS), s.r.o..............  Slovakia Corporation     Sales Company
Sauer Bibus GmbH..........................  Germany Corporation      Sales Company
Sauer-Sundstrand GmbH.....................  Germany Corporation      Holding Company/
                                                                      Management
Sauer Sundstrand a.s......................  Slovakia Corporation     Manufacturing
Sauer-Sundstrand Hydratec GmbH............  Germany Corporation      Sales Company-Inactive
Sauer-Sundstrand Iberica SA...............  Spain Corporation        Sales Company
Sauer Informatik GmbH.....................  Germany Corporation      Information Services
Sauer ZTS.................................  Slovakia Corporation     Manufacturing
Sauer Shanghai Hydrostatic
 Transmission Co. Ltd.....................  China Corporation        Manufacturing
</TABLE>

                                       64
## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________



### m 99-31305

_______________



### K ENNETH 

### C. D UCHESNE 

### ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS



### H ERCULES 

### O FFSHORE 

### C ORPORATION 

### , Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(98-CV-300)

_________________________ December 8, 2000

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In this Jones Act case, the employer appeals

a finding of 100 % liability for plaintiff’s back injury. We have reviewed the briefs and applicable law and pertinent portions of the record and have heard the arguments of counsel.

Especially given the highly deferential standard of review, we see no reversible error. the judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuan t to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.
#### Harry JACKSON, Petitioner, v. PATIO BAKE SHOP, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 43585.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Petition denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Ronald Joe Scheurenberg 
  Knight Piésold (Pty) Ltd 
  TC Watermeyer Centre 
  Cnr Rivonia Boulevard and 10th Avenue 
  Rivonia, 2128 
  South Africa

US Securities and Exchange Commission

Re Great Basin Gold Ltd. Form on 20F for the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

I, Ronald Joe Scheurenberg Pr.Eng. hereby certify that I have
  read the disclosure in connection with the Burnstone Gold Project contained
  in the subject 20F and hereby consent to the reference to myself as a named
  expert in the written disclosure in the Form 20F of Great Basin Gold Ltd.

Dated this 28th day of June, 2005.

|Name    | Ronald Joe Scheurenberg 
|------- | ------------------------
|Company | Knight Piésold (Pty) Ltd

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132935 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132935 COA: 271238 Wayne CC: 90-008584 RANDALL GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 27, 2006 order of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

s0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
#### Edwin S. SWIONTEK, Petitioner, v. William R. WALTON, M.D., et al., Respondents.

No. 43120.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 26, 1973.

William F. Blews, and Joan LoBianco Walker, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

William Duane Wood, III, of Ramseur, Bradham, Lyle, Skipper & Cramer, and Glenn M. Woodworth of Ulmer & Wood-worth, St. Petersburg, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consid*360eration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles J. Hinkaty, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2007

                                                    /S/ CHARLES J. HINKATY
                                                    ----------------------
                                                       Charles J. Hinkaty
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
#### Jose SANTANA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-953.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 29, 1978.

Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bar-tow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Clark v. State,*363 So.2d 331 (Fla.1978).

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
No. 10358.

#### The City of Cincinnati *v.*Hickey.

Decided May 26, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Mr. Jesse Lowman,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Walter A. DeCamp,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Charles J. Fitzgerald,*for defendant in error.

Judgment of superior court, general term, reversed and that of superior court, special term, affirmed on finding of facts made by the jury.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.