alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 I, Leslie
J. Christon, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Shells
Seafood Restaurants, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
annual report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
 May 2,
2005
 /s/
LESLIE J. CHRISTON
 Leslie J.
Christon
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Thomas DENNIS, Jr. v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60357.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Thomas Dennis, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

*902Writ denied. No error in the trial court’s determination.
Chris Houseman

3064 5 Mile Road Phone: 231
- 642
-0402 Email: housemanchris729@gmail.com To whom it may concern, **Summary** I seek exemption from Section 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations in order to start a local drone photography business. Operation of 1 drone, using automated flight control systems, in a cylindrical airspace measuring less than 1,000 feet in diameter, an d less than 400 feet above the ground, to photograph local scenery and homes from the water. Photography services will be offered to residential areas (homes, and land plots) for people who wish to have pictures taken of their property to hang in their ho mes, or give as gifts. I also plan to donate pictures of our beautiful surroundings to our local magazines, in order to promote tourism in our area. All endeavors will be in low
- risk, controlled environments, keeping away from populated areas. Most of my photos will be from the water, so flying near people will be extremely limited. In addition to my avoidance of traffic and civilians, my quad
- copter drone has GPS firmware which adheres to the FAA regulations for avoidance of airports, and the flight path s of other aircraft, and will automatically land when the battery level is about to expire, keeping it from falling out of the sky; m y quad
- copter is the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced. I have several years of flight experience with remote controlled drones, and would like to follow my passion in pursuing aerial photography for a living. I appreciate the FAA’s involvement in our operations, in order to keep our populations safe, and in order. 

### Sincerely, **Chris Houseman**
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flamemaster Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Company's Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report for the period ended March
          31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:  May 23, 2005                    /s/ JOSEPH MAZIN
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                       Officer and Chief Financial Officer
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

 37.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ● ● ●
EXHIBIT32.2

** **

FIRSTHARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First HartfordCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report", I Stuart I. Greenwald,Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.            The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/Stuart I. Greenwald

Stuart I. Greenwald

Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer

 

Date: March 25, 2009
EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements pertaining to the 1990 Stock Plan for Key
Employees of Temtex Industries, Inc. (Form S-8 No. 33-61415) and
the 1999 Omnibus Securities Plan of Temtex Industries, Inc. (Form
S-8 333-34458) of our report dated November 15, 2002 with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Temtex Industries, Inc.
and Subsidiaries included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended August 31, 2002.


/s/ Weaver & Tidwell LLP
Dallas, Texas

December 9, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000037008
<NAME> FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                20,189,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                21,097,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,287,000
<PP&E>                                     825,978,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (147,811,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             848,955,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,568,000
<BONDS>                                    544,645,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 31,736,000
<COMMON>                                    31,618,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 228,018,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               848,955,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            80,354,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,284,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            11,747,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,902,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,579,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,454,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
259 La. 792

#### Ernest J. PeDOTTI v. The SEWERAGE AND WATER BOARD OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 51662.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 13, 1971.

In re: The Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 250 So.2d 785.

Application denied; on the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted on the question of cost.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be granted. Our jurisprudence and this case which cast costs against gov-ermental agencies is in direct conflict with our statutory law. See R.S. 13:4521 (amended 1964) and C.C.P. Art. 1920 (Act of 1960). See comment (e). The Constitutional provision for waiver of governmental immunity from liability adopted in 1960 does not necessarily foreclose these statutory provisions’ legality. Moreover, the provisions have not been declared unconstitutional but have simply been ignored. We should consider the entire issue for the effect of our writ denial is to strike down R.S. 13:4521.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27080-27081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12451]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

[OCC Charter Number 701532]


Liberty Federal Savings Bank, Enid, Oklahoma; Approval of 
Voluntary Supervisory Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on April 16, 2018, the Office of the 
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) approved the application of Liberty 
Federal Savings Bank, Enid, Oklahoma, to convert to the stock form of 
organization. Copies of the application are available on the OCC 
website at the FOIA Reading Room (https://foia-pal.occ.gov/palMain.aspx) under Mutual to Stock Conversion Applications. If you 
have any questions, please contact Licensing Activities at (202) 649-
6260.

    Dated: June 5, 2018.


[[Page 27081]]


    By the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
Donald W. Dwyer,
Thrift Licensing Lead Expert.
[FR Doc. 2018-12451 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4810-33-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WITTAYA THEERACHANON, 

Plaintiff Below,

Appellant,

v.

FIA CARDS SERVICES and 

TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A., LLP,

Defendants Below,

Appellees.

§

§ 

§ No. 155, 2024

§ 

§ Court Below—Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. 2023-0536

§ 

§ 

§

§

Submitted: April 23, 2024

Decided: May 8, 2024

Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to 

the Court that:

(1) On April 2, 2024, a Court of Chancery Magistrate issued her final report 

under Court of Chancery Rule 144 dismissing the amended complaint filed by the 

plaintiff below-appellant, Wittaya Theerachanon. In the final report, the Magistrate 

advised that exceptions to the report and all prior reports had to be filed within eleven 

days. No exceptions have been filed.

(2) On April 16, 2024, Theerachanon filed a notice of appeal from the 

Magistrate’s final report in this Court. The Clerk’s Office issued a notice directing 
2

Theerachanon to show why this appeal should not be dismissed because the 

Magistrate’s April 2, 2024 final report had not been approved and entered as a final 

order of the court as provided in Court of Chancery Rule 144(c).

(3) In response to the notice to show cause, Theerachanon argues the merits 

of the appeal. The response does not address the jurisdictional defect.

(4) In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to 

a Magistrate for final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of 

Chancery adopting the Magistrate’s final report under Court of Chancery Rule 

144(c), this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a Magistrate’s order.1 

The parties did not stipulate to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for a final 

decision. Nor has the Court of Chancery entered an order adopting the Magistrate’s 

final report. Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed. 

1 Appleby Apartments LP v. Appleby Apartments Assocs., L.P., 2024 WL 851809, at *2 (Del. Feb. 

29, 2024) (holding the Court lacked jurisdiction over an appeal from a Magistrate’s order where 

the order had not been adopted by the Chancellor or a Vice Chancellor under Rule 144(c) and the 

parties had not stipulated to final adjudication of their matter by a Magistrate); Timco v. Allied 

World, 2023 WL 8739455, at *1 (Del. Dec. 18, 2023) (dismissing appeal from a Magistrate’s 

dismissal order in matter in which there was no adoption of the Magistrate’s dismissal order by 

the Chancellor or a Vice Chancellor under Rule 144(c) and there was no stipulation under 10 Del. 

C. § 350).
3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b),

that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/Gary F. Traynor

Justice
#### Joseph Manuel ANGULO, Appellant, v. Idell G. ANGULO, Appellee.

No. 69-109.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 12, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-248-001]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 7, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), tendered for filing changes in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, proposed to be 
effective March 1, 1997:

Fifth Revised Volume No. 1

12 Revised Sheet No. 59
14 Revised Sheet No. 60

    On January 31, 1997, Northern filed in Docket No. RP97-248-000 to 
recover costs relating to take-or-pay, pricing or other contract 
provisions, and buyout, buydown or reformation costs pursuant to the 
Commission's Order No. 528. Tariff Sheet Nos. 59 and 60 were 
inadvertently excluded from the filing. The reason for this filing is 
to file Sheet Nos. 59 and 60 which had been mistakenly omitted from the 
January 31, 1997 filing in Docket No. RP97-248-000.
    Northern states that copies of this filing were served upon the 
Company's customers and interested state commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken in this proceeding, but will not serve 
to make protestant a party to the proceedings. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3981 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### C. R. BARD, INC., Appellant, v. Marlene MASON, a single woman, formerly Marlene Clark, and Trustees of Mease Hospital, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 3, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 15, 1971.

Cecyl L. Pickle, of Knight, Underwood, Peters, Hoeveler & Pickle, Miami, for appellant.

Emerson L. Parker, of. Parker & Schultz, St. Petersburg, for Marlene Mason.

Glenn M. Woodworth, of Roney, Ulmer, Woodworth & Jacobs, St. Petersburg, for Trustees of Mease Hospital.

MANN, Judge.

An intravenous catheter inserted into the vein of plaintiff was severed somehow and part of it traveled through the vein to the heart, necessitating complex surgery. Bard manufactured the catheter and contends that the verdict against it is founded on an inference on an inference.

There was testimony that a small percentage of Bard’s catheters contained burrs which could result in the severance of the inserted portion even though it was properly inserted. The jury’s verdict depends on finding that this happened in this instance. Bard says that this finding depends upon inference that the particular catheter— both ends of which were “routinely” discarded by the two hospitals involved — was faulty and a further inference that the portion which traveled to the heart was severed in this manner. This is a beguiling argument, but it is not an “inference upon an inference” as that misunderstood phrase is used in the cases. Of course a finding that the catheter was severed as a consequence of faulty manufacture is based on an inference. There is no direct proof of this *472fact. But all of the other possibilities are excluded by direct evidence which the jury could — and obviously did — believe. This leaves the inference of faulty manufacture sufficiently supported. See Tillery v. Standard Sand and Silica Co., Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 842; Annotation, 5 A.L.R. 3d 100.

Affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
**Exhibit 99**

**Certificate of Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Chief Financial Officer**

**of**

**Delmarva Power & LightCompany**

**(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

              I, Thomas S. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer, and I, James P. Lavin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, ofDelmarva Power & Light Company, each certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delmarva Power & Light Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) the information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Delmarva Power & Light Company.

|   | /s/ Thomas S. Shaw                                                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                  |
|   | Thomas S. Shaw Chief Executive Officer August 14, 2002                           |
|   |                                                                             |
|   |                                                                             |
|   | /s/ James P. Lavin                                                               |
|   |                                                                                  |
|   | James P. Lavin Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 14, 2002 |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

March 5, 2013

Mr. Albert Johnson

State of Texas

Re: In the Matter of Equifax Information Services LLC, File No. 102 3252 

Dear Mr. Johnson:

Thank you for your comment regarding the Federal Trade Commission’s consent

agreement in the above-entitled proceeding. The Commission has placed your comment on the

public record pursuant to rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. §

4.9(b)(6)(ii), and has given it serious consideration.

 The Commission is committed to protecting consumers in financial distress as well as

safeguarding consumer privacy and believes that the proposed order with Equifax Information

Services LLC will further this objective. 

Your comment raised concerns about robocalling and we appreciate your ideas about

how to reduce the number of illegal robocalls received by consumers. 

 

 Having considered all of the facts of this case and all of the comments submitted in

response to the proposed order, the Commission has determined that the public interest

would best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without any modifications.

The final Decision and Order and other relevant materials are available from the Commission’s

website at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of

sources in its work. The Commission thanks you again for your comment.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Leibowitz and Commissioner Wright not

participating.

Richard C. Donohue

Acting Secretary
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2014

No. 04-13-00739-CR

Andres R. CISNEROS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR0183

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is 

extended to May 30, 2014.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of April, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court