alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18197]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7528]

Extension of Agreement Between the United States Department of 
State and the Council on Accreditation

    The United States Department of State and the Council on 
Accreditation agree that the Agreement Between the U.S. Department of 
State and the Council on Accreditation Regarding Performance of Duties 
as an Accrediting Entity Under the Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000 
will remain in effect until July 11, 2016.

    Dated: July 11, 2011.
Janice Jacobs,
Assistant Secretary, Consular Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-18197 Filed 7-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Forlink
Software Corporation, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the
company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.

March 31, 2005

/s/ Hongkeung Lam
--------------------------------------
Hongkeung Lam, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from SEC Form
10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         153,529
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,349
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               15,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    440,427
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         301,079
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           309,818
<LOANS>                                        2,421,875
<ALLOWANCE>                                    30,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,432,463
<DEPOSITS>                                     2,977,579
<SHORT-TERM>                                   122,470
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            37,095
<LONG-TERM>                                    29,714
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       26,277
<OTHER-SE>                                     239,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 3,432,463
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                163,429
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              33,413
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,743
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               198,585
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             89,587
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             94,978
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          103,607
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  7,417
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (84)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                80,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                42,470
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     30,761
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   30,761
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                    7,546
<LOANS-PAST>                                   7,919
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               551
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                937
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               28,163
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  6,467
<RECOVERIES>                                   1,854
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              30,967
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           30,967
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
March
      11, 2010
              
              Analyst
      Contact:
              Andrew
      Ziola918-588-7163Media
      Contact:
              Megan
      Washbourne918-588-7572




ONEOK,
Inc. and ONEOK Partners to Participate in
 Morgan
Stanley MLP and Diversified Natural Gas
 Corporate
Access Day
  TULSA,
Okla. –March 11, 2010 –
ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in
the Morgan Stanley MLP and Diversified Natural Gas Corporate Access Day in New
York City on Tuesday, March 16, 2010.
  John W.
Gibson, president and chief executive officer of ONEOK and chairman, president
and chief executive officer of ONEOK Partners, and Curtis L. Dinan, chief
financial officer and treasurer for both entities, will be conducting a series
of one-on-one meetings with members of the investment community.
  The materials
utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK
Partners Web sites, www.oneok.com, www.oneokpartners.com, that morning,
beginning at 8 a.m. Central Daylight Time.
 
 
 ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited
partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and
transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier
natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent
and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a
wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy
company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is
one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy
services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related
services throughout the U.S.
  ONEOK,
Inc. (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company. We are the general partner and
own 42.8 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest
publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering,
processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one
of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply
in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. ONEOK
is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more
than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas. Our energy services
operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services
throughout the U.S. ONEOK is a Fortune 500 company.
  For more
information, visit the Web sites at www.oneokpartners.com or www.oneok.com.
OKE-FV OKS-FV
  ###
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 1 6 0

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00082-CV

IN RE B.L. RELATOR

------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING TRIAL COURT NO. 233-515485-12

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------ The court has considered relator’s peti tion for writ of mandamus and real
party in interest’s response and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.
Accordingly, relator’s petition fo r writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and MEIER, JJ.
DELIVERED: April 18, 2016

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
##### 



ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
  Platform
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
  Period
       The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust 
     Company, N.A.
BNYM (Delaware) formerly known as
     The Bank of New York (Delaware)/s/ Robert GriffinRobert L. GriffinAuthorized OfficerThe Bank of New York/s/ Samir PandiriSamir PandiriAuthorized OfficerFebruary 29, 2008
 The Bank of New York
The Bank of New York Trust
     Company, N.A./s/ Patrick J. TadiePatrick J. TadieAuthorized Officer




---



##### 



Payments on pool assets are deposited into the appropriate custodial bank accounts
and related bank clearing accounts no more than two business days of receipt, or such other number
of days specified in the transaction agreements.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 2/1/2023 | Document No. 606822 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., )

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., )

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On January 31, 2023, non-party Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC (“SIE”) filed a 

motion to extend the time for it to file a motion to quash or to limit a subpoena served on SIE by 

Federal Trade Commission Complaint Counsel (“Motion”). SIE represents that Complaint 

Counsel agrees with the relief requested in the Motion. 

Upon review and consideration of the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that SIE’s deadline to file a motion to quash or to limit Complaint Counsel’s subpoena 

is extended to February 15, 2023. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: February 1, 2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Federal Trade Commission WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of Commissioner

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter

STATEMENT OF COMMISSIONER REBECCA KELLY SLAUGHTER

In the Matter of FTC vs. Equifax, Inc. 

Commission File No. 172 3203 

July 22, 2019 

 The FTC, the CFPB, and 50 state partners filed complaints today alleging that Equifax 

failed to take basic steps to secure personal information stored on its network—resulting in the 

2017 data beach that jeopardized the personal data of a staggering 147 million people. The relief 

announced in today’s settlement should go a long way to help consumers navigate the harms 

Equifax inflicted and prevent them from recurring: up to $425 million in direct relief to 

consumers in the form of compensation for breach-related harms and extensive free credit 

monitoring, plus rigorous data security requirements.1

 

But this relief is no substitute for preventing the breach in the first place, and this breach 

was preventable. Equifax’s alleged violations included failures to address unpatched critical and 

high-risk vulnerabilities across systems that persisted for months at a time.

2

 In other words, 

internal warnings went unheeded. Under the terms of the FTC consent order announced today, 

Equifax is required to create a system to solicit and address security concerns raised by any 

employee. If Equifax employees face concerns that they are flagging security issues to no avail 

or that the company is failing to abide by its data security promises, the FTC encourages them to 

reach out to the Commission at equifax@ftc.gov. 

 This advice goes beyond Equifax. If you work at a company that is failing to take privacy 

seriously, the FTC wants to know about it. You can file a complaint at 

https://www.ftccomplaintassistant.gov. If you see something, say something—and help prevent 

the next breach before it happens. 

 

1 The total amount of potential monetary relief, including civil penalties assessed by the CFPB and our state 

partners, is up to $700 million. Press Release, Fed. Trade Comm’n, Equifax to Pay $575 Million as Part of Settlement 

with FTC, CFPB, and States Related to 2017 Data Breach (July 22, 2019), https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/pressreleases/2019/07/equifax-pay-575-million-part-settlement-ftc-cfpb-states-related. 2 FTC v. Equifax, No. 1:19-mi-99999-UNA (N.D. Ga. filed July 22, 2019), Compl. ¶ 23, 

https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/172_3203_equifax_complaint_7-22-19.pdf.
259 La. 811

#### Elverse J. SUIRE et al. v. PATIN’S TIRE SERVICE, INC., et al.

No. 51716.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: Patin Tire Service, Inc. and Security Insurance Company of Hartford, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vermilion. 251 So.2d 182.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Network CN Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shirley Cheng, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Shirley ChengShirley ChengInterim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





May 10, 2013








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Network CN Inc. and will be retained by Network CN Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                [LETTERHEAD OF LARSSON, WOODYARD & HENSON, LLP]



The Board of Directors
Community Financial Corp.
240 East Chestnut
Olney, Illinois 62450

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-92534 and 333-322) on Form S-8 of Community Financial Corp. of our report
dated February 10, 2000, relating to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of Community Financial Corp. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1999
and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, which report
appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Community
Financial Corp.



/s/ Larsson, Woodyard & Henson, LLP


March 23, 2000
Paris, Illinois
- - -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 •t!>' 

Bureau of Consumer Protection 

Division of Enforcement 

February 19, 2020 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Laura Brett, Esq.

Vice President 

National Advertising Division 

112 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

Re: Advertising for Nectar Mattress 

Dear Ms. Brett: 

We have reviewed the National Advertising Division's ("NAD") referral of advertising 

claims by Nectar Brand LLC ("Nectar") for its online marketing of its bedding and mattresses. 

As you know, in early 2019, Nectar participated in NAD's self-regulatory process, and agreed to 

comply with all of the recommendations set forth in NAD's July 2019 decision. NAD's referral 

to the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Commission") alleges that Nectar failed to make a 

good faith attempt to comply with NAD's recommendations. 

Upon careful review of this referral, we have determined not to take additional action at 

this time. In reaching this conclusion, we considered a number of factors including resource 

allocation and enforcement priorities, the nature of any FTC Act violation, and the type and 

severity of any consumer injury. 

The staffs decision to forego a formal investigation at this time should not be construed 

as a detennination that a violation may not have occurred, just as the pendency of an 

investigation should not be construed as a determination that a violation has occurred. The 

Commission reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. The 

FTC appreciates your referral and the opportunity to continue to assist in supporting NAD. 

Sincerely, A 

Assistant Director, Division of Enforcement 

cc: Tyler Newby, Fenwick & West LLP 

s/ Laura Koss

Laura Koss
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2052

JO ANN COLE REHFUSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GREENVILLE GENERAL HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-3116)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 16, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jo Ann Rehfuss, Appellant Pro Se. Sarah McMillan Purnell, George

Dewey Oxner, Jr., HAYNSWORTH, MARION, MCKAY & GUERARD, Greenville,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Rehfuss v. Greenville

General Hosp., No. CA-97-3116 (D.S.C. June 29, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000

<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           26,685
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          28,875
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            29,035
<EQUITIES>                                     24,963
<MORTGAGE>                                        116
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   1,569
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 84,718
<CASH>                                            954
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              3,534
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          4,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 97,563
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                19,787
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             6,364
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 15,767
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           1,488
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 2,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        2,340
<OTHER-SE>                                     41,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   97,563
<PREMIUMS>                                     22,921
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             4,434
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              1,723
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    597
<BENEFITS>                                     14,125
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     4,508
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            5,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,844
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,068
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,776
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.84
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0



</TABLE>