alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Howard R. Levine,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Family Dollar Stores, Inc.,(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

•          theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 26,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Date: January 5, 2006

 

 
| /s/ Howard R. Levine |                                                                              |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Howard R. Levine                                                                  |
|                 | Chairman of the Board  and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                      |                                                                                   |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FamilyDollar Stores, Inc., and will be retained by Family DollarStores, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
----

----

----

| For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 |   | Commission File No. 0-22750 |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| California                                                    |   | 33-0224120                          |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) |   | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |

----

| 3.   | Exhibits .  Certain of the exhibits listed in the following index are incorporated by reference. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           |                                                                                                       |
| 23.2           | Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, filed herewith                                             |
|          | Royale Energy, Inc.                                    |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|          |                                                   |
| April 3, 2017 | /s/ Jonathan Gregory                                   |
|          | Jonathan Gregory                                       |
|          | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  |
| April 3, 2017 |                                                   |
|          | /s/ Stephen M. Hosmer                                  |
|          | Stephen M. Hosmer                                      |
|          | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 12


                               Dean Foods Company
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    26 Weeks Ended
                                 November 24, 1996
                                 -----------------
<S>                                    <C>
Income before taxes                     $62,164
                                        -------
Fixed charges:
        Interest expense                 13,098
        Portion of rentals (33%)          5,071
                                        -------

        Total fixed charges              18,169
                                        -------

Earnings before taxes and
        fixed charges                   $80,333
                                        =======
Ratio of earnings to
        fixed charges                       4.4
                                        =======
</TABLE>
#### Vivian Walsh BARRON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-252.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
CAUSE NO. 01-14-00602-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

___________________________ 

ANTHONY and LIZ REFERENTE, 

Appellants 

v.

CITY VIEW COURTYARD, L.P. et al 

Appellee 

___________________________ 

On Appeal from the 281st Judicial District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-00767 

___________________________ 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

 1. This case is on appeal from the 281st Judicial District Court of Harris 

County, Texas in trial court cause number Trial Court Cause No. 2013-00767 

 2. Appellee’s brief was filed on or about February 18, 2015. Appellants 

brief was due March 19, 2015. 

 3. Appellant requests an extension of time of on month from the due date, 

i.e. until Monday, April 20, 2015. 

 4. No prior extension to file the brief has been received in this cause. 

5. The need for the extension is as follows. Appellant’s counsel is a solo 

practitioner. He had already prepared a draft response to the issues on appeal, but 

needed to incorporate the record and additional case sites, and to put it in the form 

ACCEPTED

01-14-00602-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/30/2015 7:33:36 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/30/2015 7:33:36 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
required by the court. Counsel had regular clients experience unexpected complex

criminal matters which required Counsel to act immediately to protect their 

interests. Counsel also had to prepare three complex motions and responses to 

summary judgment. This in addition to counsel’s normal case load prevented him 

from completing a full brief. Appellee moves for an extension to April 20, 2015.

WHEREFORE, Appellee prays that the court grant it an extension of time to

file its brief and for such other and further relief as is just.

Respectfully submitted,

____S/James D. Pierce_______________

JAMES D. PIERCE

State Bar No. 15994500

Comerica Bank Building

One Sugar Creek Center Blvd., Suite 1080

Sugar Land, Texas 77478-3560

(713) 650-0150 office

(713) 650-0146 facsimile

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The motion is unopposed.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with Texas Rules of Appellant Civil Procedure, on March 30, 

2015, this pleading was served upon all parties and counsel of record

electronically.

_____S/James D. Pierce_________________

JAMES D. PIERCE
#### George Roger WARRINER, Appellant, v. Mary Alice WARRINER, Appellee.

No. 73-783.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,429,593
<SECURITIES>                                   297,087
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,965,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,583,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                 805,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,206,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,581,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,206,938
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,093,464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,988,068
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                105,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            105,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,945
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
You’re on the go. 

Shouldn’t your TV go with you?

$199 after rebate* 

To order, call 1-800-LetsGoTV. www.LetsGoTV.com 

LetsGoTV is a registered trademark of B3 Innovations, Inc.

LetsGo . 

Never miss your favorite programs. 

Cable Sports. 24-Hour News. 

First-Run Movies.

 

LetsGo . 

Watch whatever you want. 

Wherever you want.

LetsGo

goes everywhere you go.

But it’s more than just convenient. LetsGo is all 

about performance. With the largest screen of any 

handheld TV, LetsGo gives you crystal clear 

satellite reception. And unlike the others, LetsGo

has your favorite cable channels, like Box Seat 

Sports, Broadcast News Network and ShoMax.

TV

TV

TV

TV

TV

TV

Let’s Go.

•

•

•

•

 Weighs less than two pounds

 Thin Film Transistor activematrix technology

 Anti-glare screen for the 

clearest color and contrast even 

in bright sunlight

 Digitreck headphones 

included! 

*

$199

Client: B3 Innovations

Product: LetsGoTV

Media: Print Ad

With twelve-month contract for LetsGoTV Premium Service. Advertised price reflects $399 purchase price after $200 rebate. Termination of contract within twelve-month period voids the rebate 

and requires a cancellation fee of $50. Direct satellite reception of stations like Box Seat Sports Channel, Broadcast News Network, ShoMax and other cable channels requires a subscription to 

LetsGoTV Premium Service available for $49.95 per month. Call 1-800-LetsGoTV for more information. Additional equipment required.
{b FILE COPY

FILE URT OF APPEALS

Appeals District

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 13-0013

IN THE INTEREST OF L.O. AND

K.O., CHILDREN

§

§

§

§

§

Angelina County,

12th District.

April 5, 2013

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

May 31, 2013

Petitioner's motion for rehearing of petition for review, filed herein in the above

numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

••••*•••••

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner pay all costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 7th day ofJune, 2013.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Kathy Sandoval, Deputy Clerk
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert O’BRIEN, John O’Neill, John Herman, David Grussfeld, Steve Martin, Greg Orr, Michael Tidmarsh and Richard Badalaro.

No. 61165.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Robert O’Brien, et al applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus and stay order. Parish of St. Bernard.

Writ granted. The ruling of the trial judge is set aside and the case is remanded for a new hearing on the motion to suppress. When the mover has shown that the evidence was seized without a search warrant, the burden of proof is on the State. *Vale v. Louisiana,*399 U.S. 30, 90 S.Ct. 1969, 26 L.Ed.2d 409 (1970).
#### Clinton R. SALTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-868.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 4, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
(see attached scope of accreditation for field(s) of inspection, including type, range, methods or procedures)

Print Date: 08/25/2011 Page 1 of 3 

### This is to signify that



# NTA, INC.

305 N OAKLAND AVE NUE

NAPPANEE, IN DIANA 46550



### Inspection Agency AA

- 682

Type A (Third

- Party) Inspection Body

(Revised August 3, 2011)

has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Inspection Agencies (AC98), has demonstrated compliance with

ISO/IEC Standard 17020, General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection

, and has been

accredited, commencing September 22, 2009 , to provide inspection services in the approved scope of accreditation.

Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.

Vice President President

### NTA, Inc. AA

- 682

Type A (Third

- Party) Inspection Body

(Revised August 3, 2011)

September 22, 2009

Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.

President

Print Date: 08/25/2011 Page 2 of 3 

### NTA, Inc. Phil Jones

305 N Oakland Ave

. VP Operations

Nappanee, IN 46550 (574) 773

- 7975

FIELDS OF

INSPECTIONS TYPE AND RANGE OF

INSPECTIONS INSPECTION METHODS

AND PROCEDURES

Building, plumbing, electrical, mechanical and

structural systems of modular factory

- built

construction In

- plant and in

- situ International Building Code , Chapter 17, S ection

1703.5; International Residential Code

, Sections

R104.4 and R109; and NTA Inspection Methods

2.1, 3.1 and 4.1

Deck Board Span Rating and Handrail

Systems In

- plant NTA Inspection Method 8.1

Structural Insulated Panels In

- plant NTA Inspection Method 14.1

Light Gauge and Cold

- Formed Steel

Structural Components In

- plant NTA Inspection Method 15.1

Wood

- based building products

- formaldehyde

emissions In

- plant California Code & Regulation Section 93120, Title

17, NTA IM 31.1

Thermal and moisture barrier underlayment In

- plant NTA IM 35.0

### NTA, Inc. AA

- 682

Type A (Third

- Party) Inspection Body

(Revised August 3, 2011)

September 22, 2009

Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.

President

Print Date: 08/25/2011 Page 3 of 3

FIELDS OF

INSPECTIONS TYPE AND RANGE OF

INSPECTIONS INSPECTION METHODS

AND PROCEDURES

Adhesives In

- plant NTA Inspection Method 22

Manufacturing in fields specified above Qualification and Follow up In

- plant ICC

- ES Acceptance Criteria AC304
UNITED STATES
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D. C. 20549

                                   FORM 8-K

Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event         Commission File Number: 0-20707
reported): March 31, 1996


                     COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



                Delaware                              63-1098468
        (State of organization)                      (IRS Employer
                                                  Identification Number)

        2101 Sixth Avenue North                          35203
               Suite 750                              (Zip Code)
          Birmingham, Alabama
(Address of principal executive offices)

                                (205) 250-8700
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)







<PAGE>

                       COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


Item 5. Other Events


The  Registrant  adopted  Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No. 128,
"Earnings Per Share" (SFAS 128) effective with its Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 1997. The Registrant is filing as exhibits to this Form 8-K amended
Financial Data Schedules for interim  periods in 1997 and 1996, and for the year
ending  December 31, 1996.  The  Registrant  has  calculated  earnings per share
(unit) amounts in accordance with SFAS 128 and entered basic and diluted amounts
in place of primary and fully diluted, respectively.






<PAGE>
      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  amendment  to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                    COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
                                      a Delaware limited partnership

                                   By: Colonial Properties Holding Company, Inc.
                                           its general partner




Date:  March 31, 1998               /s/ Howard B. Nelson, Jr.
                                    -------------------------
                                    Howard B. Nelson, Jr.
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (Duly Authorized Officer
                                    and Principal Financial Officer)




<PAGE>


                       COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


Index to Exhibits


 Exhibits

27.Q196        Financial  Data  Schedule - 1st Quarter  1996
27.Q296        Financial  Data Schedule - 2nd Quarter 1996
27.Q396        Financial  Data Schedule - 3rd Quarter 1996
27.1996 Annual Financial Data Schedule - Year Ending  December 31, 1996
27.Q197        Financial Data Schedule - 1st Quarter 1997
27.Q297        Financial Data Schedule - 2nd Quarter 1997
27.97Q3        Financial Data Schedule - 3rd Quarter 1997
EXHIBIT 4.3
                           MPOWER HOLDING CORPORATION
                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                      TO THE PRIMARY NETWORK HOLDINGS, INC.
                                STOCK OPTION PLAN


         WHEREAS, on May 24, 2001, the stockholders of Mpower Communications
Corp. ("Mpower") approved a reorganization (the "Reorganization") pursuant to
which Mpower became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mpower Holding Corporation (the
"Corporation");

         WHEREAS, the Corporation assumed the Primary Network Holdings, Inc.
Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") as of the effective time of the Reorganization
(the "Effective Time") and each option to purchase a share of Mpower under the
Plan was substituted with an option to purchase a share of Holding under the
same terms and conditions (a "Substitute Option");

         WHEREAS, the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company
(the "Board") may amend the Plan as they deem advisable;

         NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof, the Company amends the
Plan as follows:

         1. All references to the "Company" in the Plan shall refer to Mpower
Holding Corporation.

         2. All references to "Common Stock" shall refer to the Common Stock of
Mpower Holding Corporation, par value $0.001.

         3. Except as set forth herein, the Plan is hereby ratified and
confirmed in all respects.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment
effective as of July 3, 2001.


                                           MPOWER HOLDING CORPORATION



                                           By: /s/ Russell I. Zuckerman
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Russell I. Zuckerman, Esq.
                                              Senior Vice President and General
                                              Counsel
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

In the Matter of

California Naturel, Inc.,

a corporation, DOCKET NO. 9370

Respondent.

ORDER ON DEADLINE FOR RESPONDENT

TO FILE ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Pursuant to Federal Trade Commission Rule 4.2, the Secretary of the Commission has

extended the date by which Respondent may file an Answer to the Administrative Complaint, to

May 27, 2016. No further extensions ofthis deadline shall be granted except pursuant to a

motion properly filed under Rule 3.22 and a demonstration of good cause. 16 C.F.R.)$ 3.22,

4 3(b).

Nothing in this Order extends the date for commencement ofthe evidentiary hearing in

this case, which is scheduled for December 12, 2016, at 10:00a.m.

ORDERED:

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Date: May13,2016

05 13 2016

582643
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2385** 

RAMONA CLAIRE OSBORN; JOHN HENRY OSBORN, II; ROBERTA LYNN OSBORN , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv
- 02159

- RDB )

Submitted : February 20, 2014 Decided: February 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ramona Claire Osborn, John Henry Osborn, II, and Roberta Lynn Osborn , Appellants Pro Se

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ramona Claire Osborn, John Hen ry Osborn, II, and
Roberta Lynn Osborn appeal the district court ’ s order denying
relief on their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Osborn v. Un ited States ,
No. 1:13

- cv
- 02159

- RDB (D. Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Curly Lee JONES, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 42574.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### Ex parte Solomon L. SMITH, Jr.

77-306.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 24, 1978.

TORBERT, Chief Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
December 1 , 2016

Mr. William Rus sell
President Logistic Gliders

221 West A St reet, #1386 Dixon, CA 95620

Re: FAA

- 2016

- 1618

Dear Mr. Russell :

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and
have determined that we will cont inue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016 , letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov

, we

a re reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently

- issued regulation, Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 107 ( www.faa.gov/u as ) will satisfy your request. We have determined that your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, w e will publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments , if we have not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov

.

Sincerely,
/s/ Dan Ngo Program Analyst