alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 22


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment
Trust of New Jersey (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January
31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss. 78m(a) or 78o(d),
      and,

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date: March __, 2004                    /s/ Robert S. Hekemian
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Robert S. Hekemian
                                        Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                        Executive Officer
#### MICHIGAN WISCONSIN PIPELINE COMPANY v. Elroy HEBERT.

No. 2789.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1969.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 22, 1969.

Second Rehearing Denied Oct. 23, 1969.

Writs Refused Jan. 9, 1970.

Shotwell, Brown & Sperry, by Burt W. Sperry, Monroe, and Edwards, Edwards & Broadhurst, by Nolan J. Edwards, Crowley, for plaintiff-appellant.

Pugh, Buatt, Landry & Pugh, by Lawrence G. Pugh, Jr., Crowley, for defendant-appellee.

Before TATE, FRUGÉ and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case, entitled Michigan Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Eula Mae Fruge, La. App. 227 So.2d 606, the judgment appealed is amended to (1) reduce the award to Elroy Hebert to $4,561.00 and (2) delete the limitations on the servitude designated as G-l through G^6. Except for these amendments, the judgment is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against the defendant.

Affirmed, as amended.

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

Before TATE, FRUGE, SAVOY, HOOD and CULPEPPER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons assigned in the per curiam denial of defendant’s application for a rehearing in the companion case, Michigan-Wisconsin Pipeline Company v. Eula Mae Fruge, 227 So.2d 606, our original decision herein is amended to increase the award to Elroy Hebert to $4795 and the application for rehearing is denied.

TATE, J., dissents.

The reasons assigned in No. 2788 (Frugé), 227 So.2d 606.

FRUGÉ, J., votes for rehearing.
#### Daniel Chrismer, Respondent, *vs.*The St. Louis, Kansas City and Northern Railway Company, Appellant.

1. *Practice, civil*— Appeal *from Justice*— Entry *of appearance*— Trial.—In a cause appealed from a justice of the peace, the appellee, who has failed to enter his appearance, cannot be forced to trial at the first term ot the court.

*•Appeal from Warren Circuit Court.*

*John M. Woodson,*for Appellant.

I. The appellant could not be forced to trial at the first term, because the appeal is not taken on the day of the judgment, no notice was served on the appellee, and it did not enter its appearance (W. S., 850, §§21, 22; Me Cabe vs. Lecompte, 15 Mo., 78; Rowley vs. Hinds, 50 Mo., 403; Purcell vs. Han *&*St. Jo. R. R.), 50 Mo., 504; May vs. Han & St. Jo. R. R., 51 Mo., 575.)

[The other points urged in the brief are necessarily omitted? because the court did not pass upon them.]

*E. JL.*Lewis, *and Eryden and Carkener,*for Respondent.

I. The motion for a continuance was rightfully overruled. The provisions of the statute *(W.*S., 850, § 22) are for the benefit of the appellee; the appellant is always in court. (47 Mo., 498.)

II. Defendant is estopped from claiming a continuance. It subpoenaed witnesses and otherwise prepared for a trial, whereby appellee was let to understand that defendant intended to try the ease, and prepared accordingly.

[ The other points of the briefs are necessarily omitted, the court not having considered them.]

*153Napton, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment must be reversed for the reason-, that a trial was forced on defendant at the first-term, although the appellee had not entered an appearance within the first two days of that term. The other points in the case have been considered and determined in other cases decided at this term.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
#### Dewey Edwin SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-223.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 11, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          31,104
<SECURITIES>                                    11,997
<RECEIVABLES>                                  487,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,399
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               590,101
<PP&E>                                         176,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                 113,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,066,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          637,089
<BONDS>                                         65,885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       159,741
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,066,970
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               444,551
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  416,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,778
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        

</TABLE>
Form 10-Q/A
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                    Washington, D.C.  20549
                     _____________________
                                
     [X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                
       For the quarterly period ended September 30, 1995
                               OR
     [  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
             OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                
      For the transition period from ________ to ________
                                
                 Commission file number  0-7638
                                
                 FIRST MICHIGAN BANK CORPORATION           
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
                                
          MICHIGAN                               38-2024376    
 (State or other jurisdiction of               (I.R.S. Employer
  incorporation or organization)                Identification No.)
                                
          One Financial Plaza, Holland, Michigan     49423    
      (Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)
                                
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (616) 396-9200
                                
                                             
                                

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes   [X]    No   []   

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date: 18,187,411 shares of the Company's
Common Stock ($1 par value) were outstanding as of September 30, 1995.
<PAGE>

                         MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, (the "Form 10-Q") of Mackinac
Financial Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Paul D. Tobias, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
     certify that:

     (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Issuer.


/s/ Paul D. Tobias
-------------------------------------
Paul D. Tobias
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
August 11, 2006
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                               May 2, 2011

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.    Other Events
----------   --------------------------------------------

     The following is a summary of assets under management as of April 30,
2011 (in millions):


	By Investment Vehicle
	---------------------

Separate Accounts	 	$  3,702
Mutual Funds 			   4,508
Sub-Advised Mutual Funds	   1,111
Private Investment Funds	     210
                                --------
Total			       	$  9,531

	By Investment Strategy
	----------------------
Small Cap			$  1,029
Small-Mid Cap		             330
Select				     456
Large Cap 			   5,227
Long-Short		           2,309
Strategic Income		     180
				--------
Total			        $  9,531



                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------


     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: May 2, 2011	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------



         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Arup Sen the true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and his or her name, place and
stead, to sign on his or her behalf., as a director or officer, or both, as the
case may be, of Electropharmacology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), an Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
1998 and to sign any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney-in-fact or his substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         Dated:  April 8, 1999


                                              /s/ Bernard Carrico
                                              -------------------


                                              /s/ Murray Feldman
                                              ------------------


                                              /s/ Krishna Jayaraman
                                              ---------------------


                                              /s/ Richard K. Kneipper
                                              -----------------------


                                              /s/ David Saloff
                                              ----------------


                                              /s/ Stephen Seiler
                                              ------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 23.1

                        INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
Sel-Leb Marketing, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-19625) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 23, 1997
related to the statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows
of Sel-Leb Marketing, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996 which report
appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Sel-Leb
Marketing, Inc.


GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER & COMPANY, P.C.

New York, New York
March 30, 1998
Technical Support Document

EPA‐R06‐OAR‐2012‐0098

Ozone Data for the Dallas/Fort Worth Area

To interpret the data for comparison with the national ambient air quality standards

(NAAQS) for ozone, we refer to 40 CFR 50 Appendix P. Appendix P provides general information

on calculating the 8‐hour ozone average, the ozone design value, and the ozone season. In

addition, Appendix P addresses data reporting and handling conventions; primary and

secondary standard‐related summary statistic; and comparisons with the primary and

secondary ozone standards.

In reviewing the data, we found that the TCEQ reported data during the ozone season

for all 19 ozone monitors in the DFW area. We noticed that from September 28 through the

first part of December 2014, ozone data was missing from the DFW monitor site #48‐113‐0075,

known as the Dallas North #2 monitor.1 The State entered “null data codes” for the days with

missing data. Data was missing from this monitor because the monitoring site had been

vandalized. The time to secure, repair and get the monitor running included securing two

contractors and related permits for the work.

The ozone monitoring season (“ozone season”) for the DFW area runs from March 1

through October 31, which is 245 days. Consistent with 40 CFR 50, Appendix P at 2.3(b),

comparison with the primary NAAQS for ozone shall be based on three consecutive, complete

calendar years of air quality monitoring data. This requirement is met for the 3‐year period at a

monitoring site if daily maximum 8‐hour average concentrations are available for at least 90%

of the days within the ozone season, on average, for the 3‐year period, with a minimum data

completeness requirement in any one year of at least 75% of the days within the ozone season.

The design value for the area is calculated using data for ozone seasons 2012, 2013 and 2014.

During the 2014 ozone season, the Dallas North #2 monitor stopped working on September 28

and didn’t begin working again until early December. Since the months of November and

December are outside of the DFW ozone season, we do not consider them here. However, the

monitor missed the last three days of September and the entire month of October, so ran for

about (3 + 31 = 34; 245 – 34 = 211) 211 of 245 days, or about 86% of the ozone season.

Therefore, the monitor meets the data completeness requirement.  

                                                            

1 The Dallas North #2 monitor is located at 12532 1/2 Nuestra Drive and is maintained by the City of Dallas.
#### Georgeen Kay Sickles ACHESON, Appellant, v. Edward Goodrich ACHESON, Appellee.

No. 70-774.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 30, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7741 

To promote airline passenger safety during the COVID–19 public health 

emergency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2020 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself, Mrs. BEATTY, and Mr. CARSON of Indiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To promote airline passenger safety during the COVID– 

19 public health emergency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maintaining Important 

5 Distance During Lengthy Epidemics Act of 2020’’ or the 

6 ‘‘MIDDLE Act of 2020’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROMOTING AIRLINE PASSENGER SAFETY DURING 

8 THE COVID–19 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), during 

10 the period beginning on the date that is 14 days after the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7741 IH

1 date of the enactment of this Act and ending on the last 

2 day of the emergency period described in section 

3 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)), an air carrier (as defined in section 

5 40102 of title 49, United States Code) shall be prohibited 

6 from doing any of the following: 

7 (1) Permit adjacent seats to be filled on a pas8 senger aircraft. 

9 (2) Pass along the cost of any seat switch un10 dertaken by an air carrier in order to comply the 

11 prohibition under paragraph (1). 

12 (3) Permit a passenger or crewmember to board 

13 a passenger aircraft if the passenger or crewmember 

14 is not wearing a mask. 

15 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—Not later than 14 days after the 

16 date of the enactment of this Act, taking into account the 

17 provisions of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 

18 701 et seq.), the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 

19 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), section 41705 of title 49, 

20 United States Code (commonly referred to as the ‘‘Air 

21 Carrier Access Act’’), and any Federal health guidance 

22 from the Department of Health and Human Services (in23 cluding guidance related to the COVID–19 public health 

24 emergency), the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 

25 Administration, in consultation with the Secretary of 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7741 IH

1 Health and Human Services (acting through the Director 

2 of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), shall 

3 issue guidance that provides for appropriate exceptions to 

4 the prohibitions under paragraphs (1) and (3) of sub5 section (a). 

6 (c) NONDISCRIMINATION.—In carrying out the provi7 sions of this section, an air carrier may not discriminate 

8 against any person on the basis of race, color, religion, 

9 genetic information, national origin, age, disability, or sex 

10 (including sexual orientation and gender identity, preg11 nancy, childbirth, and a medical condition related to preg12 nancy or childbirth). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Willie WILLIAMS v. Matthew S. BRANIFF, Judge, Criminal District Court.

No. 61558.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Willie Williams, applying for writ of mandamus.

Granted; the district judge is ordered to act on the attached application without delay.