alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,432
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     87,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             404
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  97,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         57,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    97,710
<SALES>                                         45,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,795
<CGS>                                           39,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    600
<INCOME-TAX>                                        85
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    594
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        





</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Atlantic Subsea, Inc. )

) ASBCA Nos. 62904

- ADR, 62998

- ADR

62999

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. W912BU

- 20

- C

- 0004 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Nicholas T. Solosky, Esq.

David Timm, Esq.

P. Sean Milani

- nia, Esq.

Fox Rothschild LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

John A. Skarbek, Esq.

Jacqueline J. Ryan, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys

U.S. Army Engineer District, Philadelphia

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: December 1 4 , 2022

HEIDI L. OSTERHOUT

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62904

- ADR, 62998

- ADR,

62999

- ADR

, Appeals of Atlantic Subsea, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s

Charter.

Dated: De cember 15, 2022

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### AIRCRAFT SERVICE AND SALES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. JETAGE CONSULTANTS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-646.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 15, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Home About Us FAQ Contact Us (0) View Cart

Enter Keyword or SKU Number Search Templates Color Chart Clipart Fonts Price List

Hot Products!

All Products!

Silicone

Wristbands

As low as $0.09 ea

Order Now

Temporary

Tattoos

As low as $0.02 ea

Order Now

Custom

Buttons

As low as $0.14 ea

Order Now

Custom

Can Coolers

As low as $0.25 ea

Order Now

Customer Service

Order Status

FAQs

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Careers

About Us

Contact Us

Helpful Links

Templates

Fonts

Clipart

Color Chart

Price List

BrandNex Cares

BrandNex Blog

BrandNex TV

Contact Us

Sales

Toll Free 1 (855)-352-7263

Customer Service

1 (855)-352-7263 (Option 1) Hours of Operation

Monday - Friday 8am - 8pm CST

Saturday 10am - 8px CST

International Service: USA United Kingdom India Australia Canada

Currency: USA GBP AUD CAD EUR

Be the first of your friends

to like this

BrandN......

115K likes

Like Page

BrandNex International 

Buttons

Can Coolers

Drinkware

Hand Sanitizers

Lanyards

Microfiber Cloths

Temp Tattoos

Tyvek Wristbands

Buttons

Can Coolers

Drinkware

Hand Sanitizers

Lanyards

Lip Balm

Microfiber Cloths

Outdoor

Sun Glasses

Temp Tattoos

Tyvek Wristbands

Writing

Exhibit A
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000419 17-JUN-2014 09:40 AM
#### Ray USRY et al. v. Rubye L. Fulton KIRKLIN et al.

No. 47255.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 22, 1973.

P. O. Gibson, Jr., Herman M. Mason, Jackson, for appellants.

Fox, Lacy & Gowan, Jackson, for appel-lees.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SUGG and WALKER, J J.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; James Arden Barnett, Chancellor.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS**

 

We have issued our report dated November 14, 2003, accompanyingthe consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the AnnualReport of Versant Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31,2003.  We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the previously filed RegistrationStatements of Versant Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-87922, 333-67776,and 333-107956).

 
|                  | /s/Grant Thornton LLP |   |
|-----------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |                  |
| San Jose, CA          |                  |
| January 14, 2004 |                  |

 

----
EX 10.12 Deferred Comp Amendment #2






RADISYS CORPORATION
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE RESOLUTION
TO ADOPT
AMENDMENT NO. 2
 
The following Resolution was adopted by the Administrative Committee of the RadiSys Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan:
WHEREAS, RadiSys Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the RadiSys Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), as amended and restated effective January 1, 2008; 
WHEREAS, Section 9.1(b) of the Plan provides that the Administrative Committee may adopt certain technical, clerical, conforming or clarifying amendments or other changes to the Plan that it deems necessary or advisable; and
WHEREAS, the Administrative Committee deems it advisable to formalize the amendment to the Plan with respect to the maximum deferral percentage for director fees made by its acceptance of a director fees deferral commitment effective as of January 1, 2009, in order to reconcile an inconsistency between the Plan document and other operative documents, including various participant materials.
NOW, THEREFORE, the second sentence of Section 3.3(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective as of January 1, 2009, the maximum deferral amount shall be seventy-five percent (75%) of Salary, Bonus or Sales Commissions and one hundred percent (100%) of Director Fees.” 









SIGNATURE


This Amendment shall be effective January 1, 2009. 




	
					
	 
	 
	 
	RADISYS CORPORATION

	Date:
	November 11, 2009
	 
	By:
	/s/ Cheryl Spencer

	 
	 
	 
	 
	Cheryl Spencer

	 
	 
	 
	 
	Sr. Director of Human Resources

	 
	 
	 
	Its:
	Authorized Member of the Administrative Committee
260 La. 67

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis WASHINGTON, Jr.

No. 51515.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1971.

*77John A. Shea, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Garrison, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Louis Washington, Jr. was tried by a jury and convicted of the crime of manslaughter. He was sentenced to serve twenty (20) years in the State Penitentiary at hard labor. No bills of exception were perfected by the defendant. We are therefore limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920; State v. Ash, 257 La. 337, 242 So.2d 535 (1971). We find none.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theissuer.

 

Date:       November7, 2007

 
|   | Jeffrey P. Orleans      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeffrey P. Orleans      |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00761-CV

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant

v.

Christiana Trust, A Division of Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-16-001852, HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant John Stritzinger filed a notice of appeal in the trial court on October

18, 2016. Stritzinger, however, has been designated a vexatious litigant.

A vexatious litigant must comply with the procedures set forth in chapter 11 of the

Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code as a prerequisite to filing “new litigation,” including

obtaining permission from the appropriate local administrative judge to file an appeal. See Tex. Civ.

Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 11.102 (generally prohibiting vexatious litigant from filing “new litigation”

without permission from local administrative judge), .103 (generally prohibiting clerk of court from

filing “litigation, original proceeding, appeal, or other claim presented, pro se, by a vexatious litigant

subject to a prefiling order under Section 11.101 unless the litigant obtains an order from the

appropriate local administrative judge described by Section 11.102(a) permitting the filing”);
Johnson v. Hughey, No. 06-12-00079-CV, 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 8406, at *4–5 (Tex.

App.—Texarkana Oct. 5, 2012, no pet.) (mem. op.). The appropriate local administrative judge

with respect to the filing of this appeal is:

The Honorable Lora Livingston

261st District Court

Travis County Courthouse

P. O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767.

Accordingly, this appeal is immediately stayed. This Court orders Stritzinger within

thirty days of the date of this orderto demonstrate to this Court that he has obtained permission from

the local administrative judge to file this appeal. If he fails to comply with this order within 30 days

of the date of this order, this Court will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

It is ordered November 18, 2016.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

2
#### SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT et al., Appellants, v. Marion L. WILLIAMS et al., Appellees.

No. 72-100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John H. Moore, II, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                     501,007,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      21,785,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            94,048,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            13,623,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              1,811,857,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   2,296,371,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     2,285,669,000
<LOANS>                                 14,105,619,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                185,757,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          19,786,121,000
<DEPOSITS>                              15,922,671,000
<SHORT-TERM>                             1,403,313,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        257,773,000
<LONG-TERM>                                482,217,000
<COMMON>                                    41,520,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,678,627,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          19,786,121,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            303,912,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           67,706,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             4,952,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           376,570,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         158,065,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         185,548,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      191,022,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               10,177,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             464,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            137,012,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            103,626,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 103,626,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                68,672,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.31
<LOANS-NON>                                 80,966,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                28,668,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             4,875,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           175,548,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               13,430,000
<RECOVERIES>                                 6,950,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          185,757,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    185,757,000
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          84,146
<SECURITIES>                                 5,096,557
<RECEIVABLES>                                  325,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                    116,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,835,796
<PP&E>                                       1,522,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                 518,792
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,825,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,925,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        61,087
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,013,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,825,683
<SALES>                                      2,127,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,127,233
<CGS>                                        1,458,257
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,458,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (688,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,513
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (688,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (698,674)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.16)
        


</TABLE>
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 18
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 18
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 18
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 18
EXHIBIT
10.3.11


AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY
NOTE


-AND-


PLEDGE AND SECURITY
AGREEMENT





THIS AMENDMENTto Promissory
Note and Pledge and Security Agreement made as of the 30 day of April, 2008, by
and between Robert S. Hekemian, Jr., (hereinafter the “Borrower” or
“Pledgor”)and
FIRST REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT
TRUST of NEW JERSEY, its successors and/or assigns, (hereinafter the
“FREIT” or “Pledgee”).





W
I T N E S S E T H:




WHEREAS, Borrower borrowed the
sum of $506,000.00 from FREIT pursuant to a Promissory Note dated July 19, 2005
in the principal amount of $506,000.00  (the “Note”) and Borrower
secured the Note by entering into a Pledge and Security Agreement of even date
with the Note (the “Pledge Agreement”); and




WHEREAS, Borrower has
requested FREIT increase the principal amount under the Note and to modify the
Pledge Agreement accordingly; and




NOW, THEREFORE,inconsideration of the
payment of One and 00/100 Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable
consideration as set forth herein, the Borrower hereto agrees as
follows:




1.           The
Note is hereby increased from $506,000.00 to $1,222,000.00 as of the date hereof
and in all respects the terms and conditions of the Note shall remain the same,
except for the increase in the principal amount thereof to the extent of the
amount actually advanced there under, which advances may be made from time to
time by FREIT in the same manner as if Borrower had executed a new or
replacement to include the amount advanced pursuant to this Amendment
Agreement.  Interest shall be payable in accordance with the Note on
the unpaid principal balance.




2.           The
Pledge Agreement is hereby amended to provide that all references therein to the
Note shall be deemed to be amended hereby as well as any and all future
modifications of the Note and any increases therein.  Except as set
forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Pledge Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.


Page
83


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have
executed this Amendment Agreement as of the day and year first above
written.







WITNESS:
            
            BORROWER
      / PLEDGOR:/s/
      Carolyn Jacob
            
            /s/Robert
      S. Hekemian, Jr.Borrower
      or PledgorRobert S. Hekemian,
      Jr.PrintedFIRST
      REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST OF NEW JERSEY/s/ Carolyn
      Jacob
            
            By:
            /s/ Donald
      Barney







Page 84
(NV6Z11) 0107 “9 HY DOC'b0' LUOUTU-OMSLUVHO\:S

(uor}ia ¢gog)
yoddng Vas | vou y¢/p was bey SO/ET/TI
(uot g°1Z$)
yoddng uoneusUanY IDuYd | VON 1°61 Was J93IN SO/P I/II
(wort g°97$)
yoddng AOU | Vout zo-gt was woorowreED) SO/PT/OT
90uR\sIssSy
yOIJUOD-Is0g (wort LIS)
voddng | Aouesiowg jeuonmppy | voy ¢z'01 Ads ney SO/61/01
ane addy, qunoury Aunop ajeqg jeaoiddy
pivog

$007 ‘TE 42quiadag — | 19q0}99
Surpua’] pung Arvjau0yy JevoHLUAI}U] Uo ssaasa0Z 0} y10day Apsazreng



(AW80:11) 0102 ‘9 IBd¥ DO'S. LNOATH-ONSLAVHOS

(uoyne ¢-9¢5n)

yioddng sourjsissy AouaSi0urg UOT [> UGS SOAIP[RIL $0/0/€0
(voy ¢z¢1$sn)

uoddng | courssissy AousSiomg | uonprn c¢-gol UdS Byury US $0/P0/€0
(voy Zgegsn)

yoddng AOUd | vor 7°57 Was Peqd | s00z/91/z0
(uorM O'OISSA)

yoddng ADAd | vor gs-9 Yas J08IN SO/TE/1O
(voy Z's99$Sn)

yoddng Vas | von ger uas | oqndoy uvormm0g SO/TE/10
(wor 9°¢1$sn)

uoddng Voda | vont €7'01 Yas nIeH SO/O1/10

wontIsog

WOnIsoOg 10} uoseay ‘sn addy, qunowy Ayunod 238q jeaoiddy
pivog

$007 ‘Te qoaey — | Arenuee
Sulpua’y pung Aseyau0yy [euoneuiozUy UO ssa1du0,) 0) JA0day Aj19}1eN\



(worn €1°T$)

uoddng Vas | uourtu ¢-99, Yas Aensniy $0/80/90
OdIH poouryuy

Jopuy dourjsissy (wort 6'¢$)
yoddng CULoquy eUoNIppy | vor p AGS 9UOeT BLIOIS $0/10/90

(vor ZEs)
yoddng ADYd | _ vor ez yas Pluouny Jo orqnday S0/SZ/SO

(uourig O1$)

uoddng Vas | __¥orl!q 99°9 yas Aoyan], SO/T1/SO

(wort ¢19$)
uoddng Vas | Your cop Yas BIqWO[OD $0/67/b0

(uo p59)
yoddng uonejuouBny yas | vOITN Og zp Yas BIATOg $0/80/r0

| woHIsog
uOHIsog 10 UosBoy a1 adky, yunoury Anunop ajeq jeaoiddy

pavog

$007 ‘og oun — | jdy
sulpua’y puny Aivjou0y, [euoHEUIa}Uy WO ssa1dU0,) 0} JAoday AJ19}1eN|



(AV LO:11) 0107 ‘9 [udy ooq'so LYOdTA-OE\ CSOXUENOOPNG waywog\sap.q jouraquy Arerodwoy\ssumag [eoo]\suoss9]]oy\sdumag puy syuaumMo0q\:D

(uorput g°¢z$)

poddng vas | worm /T¢ Yas Ad ‘Bluopaoeyy SO/1E/80
90uRjsIssy
OdIH pooueyug | (Wort 1-Z7¢gs)
uoddng WHO] TEUONIPPW | UOorTMU Oss Yas | oNqndey -waq ‘o3u0> $0/62/80
(wort 16g)
uoddng AON | von 61-9 yas uruog
90uPjsissy
OdIH peoueyug (worry g°9$)
yoddng WAI] [eUOHIppy | VOI 8z9'p AAS
(orp 6'¢¢$)
poddng AOU | vor Lge Was Impey 0/50/80
(vor ¢-p$)
uioddng AOUd | VOU 96°7 AAS | ediounrg > gwoL oes 0/10/80
WOnIsog
dOnIsog 10; uosray sn adky qunoury AxyuneD ajeq jeaoiddy
pivog

$007 ‘Og Aoquiaydag — | Ang
Sulpusy pung Arejou0p, [BUOHeUAIJUT UO sso18U0D 0} Jaoday ApA9}1EN?>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Republic
Corporation of America (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan P. Rosen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Jonathan P. Rosen
    ------------------------
Name: Jonathan P. Rosen
Chief Executive Officer
May 25, 2004