alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     870  
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                            1,411   
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0  
<INVENTORY>                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS><F1>                         0
<PP&E>                                 167,705      
<DEPRECIATION>                          41,546           
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         173,454      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES><F1>                    0
<BONDS>                                132,218      
<COMMON>                                    63 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                              22,588           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           173,454      
<SALES>                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        20,176     
<CGS>                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           17,733     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       9,449    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          3,023    
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3,023    
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             3,023    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .57 
<FN>                                        
<F1> Mid-Atlantic Realty Trust (MART) is in the specialized real estate
<F1> industry for which the current/noncurrent distinction is deemed in
<F1> practice to have little or no relevance.  Therefore, MART prepares
<F1> unclassified balance sheets which do not report current assets or
<F1> current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

p1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

138623

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138623 COA: 281385 Oakland CC: 2007-213264-FH MICKEY ALLEN HICKS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 17, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<CIK> 0000037032
<NAME> FIRST VIRGINIA BANKS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         402,355
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               225,238
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,955,584
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,957,102
<LOANS>                                      5,994,091
<ALLOWANCE>                                     68,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,054,929
<DEPOSITS>                                   7,675,896
<SHORT-TERM>                                   252,029
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             93,916
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,355
<COMMON>                                        35,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        637
<OTHER-SE>                                     993,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               9,054,929
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                237,372
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               56,180
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 9,350
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               302,902
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             100,612
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,642
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          196,648
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    8,590
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  27
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                143,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,197
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      93,197
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    60,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.95
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,781
<LOANS-PAST>                                    12,213
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,968
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,575
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                62,761
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,052
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,784
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               68,634
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            68,634
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```
**FAMLIY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
                STATEMENT RE COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**

                                                                      QUARTER ENDED                  QUARTER ENDED
AS PRESENTED (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)                DECEMBER 1, 2001              NOVEMBER 25, 2000
                                                                  -----------------------       -----------------------
                                                                     BASIC      DILUTED            BASIC      DILUTED
                                                                  ----------   ----------       ----------   ----------

AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                           172,252      172,252          171,177      171,177
NET INCOME                                                           $50,207      $50,207          $41,461      $41,461
NET INCOME PER SHARE                                                   $0.29        $0.29            $0.24        $0.24
PRO FORMA DILUTION IMPACT OF COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS
ADDITIONAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES FROM ASSUMED EXERCISE
   AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR OF DILUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS                           5,515                         4,818
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES ASSUMED REPURCHASED FROM
   ASSUMED PROCEEDS OF EXERCISES USING TREASURY STOCK
   METHOD (AVERAGE MARKET PRICE)
                                                                                   (4,170)                       (3,933)
                                                                               ----------                    ----------
NET PRO FORMA COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES                            1,345                           885
PERCENTAGE DILUTION FROM PRO FORMA COMMON
   STOCK EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES                                               0.78%                         0.52%
TOTAL COMMON STOCK AND COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS                                   173,597                       172,062
NET INCOME                                                                        $50,207                       $41,461
PRO FORMA NET INCOME PER SHARE (INCLUDING DILUTIVE
   COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS)                                                        $0.29                         $0.24
```
EXHIBIT 12-1

                           FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF CONSOLIDATED RATIO OF
              EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
                                    ($000'S)
                                    UNAUDITED

                                                                     3 MONTHS
                                                                       2000
                                                                       ----
EARNINGS:
---------

Net earnings                                                           $8,372
Taxes on income                                                         5,317
Total fixed charges                                                    25,681
Capitalized interest                                                   (1,475)
Capitalized interest amortized                                            546
Equity earnings of non-consolidated associated companies accounted for
        by the equity method, net of dividends                         (4,546)
                                                                     --------

                                                                     $ 33,895
                                                                     ========
FIXED CHARGES:
--------------

Interest expense (includes dividend on preferred security of $3,937) $ 19,411
Capitalized interest                                                    1,475
Imputed Interest on non-capitalized lease payment                       4,795
                                                                     --------

                                                                     $ 25,681
                                                                     ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                       1.32
                                                                     ========



Note: There were no preferred shares outstanding during the period indicated
and, therefore, the consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges and combined
fixed charges and preferred share dividend requirements would have been the same
as the consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges and combined fixed
charges for the period indicated.
#### ESTATE of Martin SCHWEGMANN v. Edmond SCHWEGMANN.

No. 54496.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: Estate of Martin Schwegmann applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson, 288 So.2d 385.

*242It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Terry D. Wall, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
          as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
          the Company for the periods presented.

Dated: December 14, 2004


/s/ TERRY D. WALL
----------------------------------------------
Terry D. Wall
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.6

                        AMENDMENT TO M.S. CARRIERS, INC.
                           INCENTIVE STOCK OPTION PLAN

     WHEREAS, the M.S. Carriers, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan (the "Plan")
was adopted by M.S. Carriers, Inc. (the "Company") on February 28, 1986, under
which options may be granted from time to time to eligible employees of the
Company;

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in order to provide for
continued disinterested administration of the Plan to allow for grants of
options under the Plan to be exempt from Section 16(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to document the prior elimination of any
restriction on the transfer of shares purchased under the Plan.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the M.S. Carriers, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan is
hereby amended in the following manner:

                                       I.

     Section 2. ADMINISTRATION OF THE PLAN. is hereby deleted in its entirety
and the following is substituted in its place:

     2. ADMINISTRATION. The Plan shall be administered by the members of the
Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors who are not employees
of the Company (the "Committee"), which committee shall consist of not less than
two members. Meetings will beheld at such times and places as shall be
determined by the Committee. A majority of the members of the Committee shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and the vote of a majority
of those members present at any meeting shall decide any question brought before
that meeting. In addition, the Committee may take any action otherwise proper
under the Plan by the unanimous written consent of its members. No member of the
Committee shall be liable for any act or omission of any other member of the
Committee or for any act or omission on his own part, including but not limited
to, the exercise of any power or discretion given to him under the Plan, except
those resulting from his own gross negligence or willful misconduct. All
questions of interpretation and application of the Plan, or of options granted
hereunder shall be subject to the determination, which shall be final and
binding, of a majority of the Committee.
<PAGE>
                                       II.

     Section 13. RESTRICTION ON TRANSFER OF SHARES. is hereby deleted in its
entirety.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed this 11th day of
December, 1995.

                                        M.S. Carriers, Inc.


                                        By: /s/ M. J. Barrow
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            M. J. Barrow, Secretary
The State of New Hampshire 

Department of Environmental Services 

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner 

Mr. Curtis Spalding 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I 

5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

December 16, 2014 

Re: Revision to New Hampshire's State Implementation Plan to Meet the Requirements of 

the Clean Air Act, Section 169A, Protection of Visibility- Regional Haze Progress Report 

and Amendment to Env-A 2302.02, Emission Standards Applicable to Tangential-Firing, 

Dry-Bottom Boilers 

Dear Mr. Spalding: 

Pursuant to Section 110 of the federal Clean Air Act as amended, the New Hampshire Department of 

Environmental Services (NHDES) submits one hard copy and one electronic copy of this State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to fulfill the requirements of section 169A, pertaining to 

protection of visibility. The enclosed SIP revision includes New Hampshire's Regional Haze 5-Year 

Progress Report and a related amendment to administrative rule Env-A 2302.02, Emission Standards 

Applicable to Tangential-Firing, Dry-Bottom Boilers. NHDES has prepared this SIP revision in 

accordance with the general SIP submittal requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V and in 

accordance with USEPA regulations and guidance on regional haze plans and progress reports. As 

Governor Maggie Hassan's designee, I am requesting EPA's approval of this SIP revision. 

The USEPA and the Federal Land Managers have provided comments on the regional haze progress 

report. NHDES has addressed these comments in the SIP revision and has included documentation 

certifying the public process. 

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Jeff Underhill at (603) 271-1102. 

caw/chm 

enclosures: paper copy and electronic copy 

via email and postal service 

ec: Anne Arnold, EPA Region I 

Anne McWilliams, EPA Region I 

Holly Salazer, NPS 

Tim Allen, FWS 

Ralph Perron, FS 

Bret Anderson, FS 

www.des.nh.gov 

Sincerely, 

4-o£U~·~ Craig A. Wright 

Director 

Air Resources Division 

29 Hazen Drive • PO Box 95 • Concord, NH 03302-0095 

(603) 271-3503 • TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

114 

CA 14-00926 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, 

PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NIRAV R. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., COMMISSIONER, 

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, 

RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (VICTOR PALADINO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

WHITEMAN, OSTERMAN & HANNA LLP, ALBANY (CHRISTOPHER E. BUCKEY OF

COUNSEL), AND NANCY ROSE STORMER, P.C., UTICA, FOR

PETITIONER-PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

Appeal and cross appeal from a judgment (denominated order and

judgment) of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (Hugh A. Gilbert,

J.), entered February 27, 2014 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding and

declaratory judgment action. The judgment, among other things,

annulled the determination of respondents-defendants and directed

respondents-defendants to allow petitioner-plaintiff’s claims for

reimbursement. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously modified on the law by denying the petition-complaint in

its entirety, and by granting judgment in favor of respondentsdefendants as follows:

It is ADJUDGED and DECLARED that section 61 of part D

of section 1 of chapter 56 of the Laws of 2012 has not been

shown to be unconstitutional, 

and as modified the judgment is affirmed without costs. 

Same memorandum as in Matter of County of Chautauqua v Shah (___

AD3d ____ [Mar. 20, 2015]).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7685 

To require the Federal Trade Commission in consultation with the Internal 

Revenue Service to submit a report to Congress on scams targeting 

seniors, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2020 

Mr. HARDER of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Trade Commission in consultation 

with the Internal Revenue Service to submit a report 

to Congress on scams targeting seniors, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors 

5 from Scams Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7685 IH

1 SEC. 2. FTC REPORT ON SCAMS TARGETING SENIORS DUR2 ING EMERGENCIES. 

3 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

4 of this Act, the Federal Trade Commission (referred to 

5 in this Act as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall, in consultation 

6 with the Internal Revenue Service (referred to in this Act 

7 as the ‘‘IRS’’), submit a report to Congress including— 

8 (1) a description of the number and types of 

9 scams identified by the Commission as being tar10 geted at senior citizens, including scams related to 

11 economic stimulus and relief payments related to 

12 COVID–19; and 

13 (2) policy recommendations to prevent such 

14 scams, especially as such scams relate to future na15 tional emergencies. 

16 SEC. 3. INCREASING AWARENESS OF SCAMS TARGETING 

17 SENIORS. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the 

19 date of enactment of this Act, the Commission and the 

20 IRS shall each update their websites to include the latest 

21 information, searchable by region and type of scam, on 

22 scams targeting seniors, including contacts for relevant 

23 law enforcement and adult protective service agencies. 

24 (b) COORDINATION WITH MEDIA OUTLETS AND LAW

25 ENFORCEMENT.—The Commission shall work with media 

26 outlets and law enforcement agencies to distribute the inVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:25 Aug 06, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7685.IH H7685

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7685 IH

1 formation included in the website of the Commission pur2 suant to subsection (a) to senior citizens and their families 

3 and caregivers. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
|   | Exhibit 32.2 |
|--------|--------------|

| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 |
|---------------------------------------|

| OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |
|-----------------------------------|

| In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Winthrop Realty Trust (“the Company”) for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C. Staples, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By: | /s/Thomas C. Staples |
|-----|----------------------|

| Name: | Thomas C. StaplesChief Financial Officer |
|-------|------------------------------------------|

| September 1, 2011 |
|-------------------|
A LL61 

# W011-

WHAY. Al

STATE OF LOUISIANA 

### VERSUS ALLEN J. HARRISON 

### NO. 

### 2023 KW 1068 

### DECEMBER4, 

### 2023 In Re: Allen 

### J. Harrison, 

### applying for supervisory writs,



### 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 

### 612593. BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, 

### JJ.

WRITDENIED. 

### PMC CHH SMM