alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1










December 1, 2011

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Brad Borror918-588-7582





ONEOK Partners to Participate in


Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Energy Symposium
  TULSA, Okla. –Dec. 1, 2011 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the 10thAnnual Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Energy Symposium in New York City on Dec. 6-7, 2011.
 
 John W. Gibson, ONEOK Partners chairman, president and chief executive officer, will present on Tuesday, Dec. 6, at 10:35 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (9:35 a.m. Central Standard Time).
 
 The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com. A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days. The company will also post the presentation on its website that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).
  
 ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
  For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com.
  For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners.
  # # #
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7880 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7880

  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
update information to borrowers on the use of economic injury disaster 
     loan proceeds to respond to COVID-19, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2020

  Mr. Ted Lieu of California introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
update information to borrowers on the use of economic injury disaster 
     loan proceeds to respond to COVID-19, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reopen Small Businesses Safely 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF ECONOMIC INJURY DISASTER LOAN PROCEEDS FOR COVID-19 
              RESPONSE.

    The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall update 
information provided to borrowers of loans made under section 7(b)(2) 
of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(2)) to allow such borrowers 
to use such loans to purchase items necessary to ensure the health and 
safety of employees and customers in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
                                 <all>
```
Attendees at EPA’s January 23, 2014 Public Hearing on the 2015-2019 Proposed HCFC Allocation Rule

In addition to the names below, EPA staff were also in attendance

Name Affiliation

Charlie McCrudden Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA)

Christine Hazelbaker Air Conditioning Contractors of America (ACCA)

Jim Scott AGC Chemicals

Emmanuel Dupree Airgas 

Jay Kestenbaum Airgas 

Kevin Faye Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy

Stephen Van Maren Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy

Bill Anaya Alston & Bird LLP

Bob Kamins Altair

Matthew Ritter Arkema

David Kunz Arkema

Jessica Olson Ayres Law Group

Ken Ponder Choice Refrigerants

Don Magid Combs Investment Properties

Ralph Werling Daikin America/MDA Manufacturing

Julian DeBullet deBullet Consulting, LLC

Pete Mullenhard

DoD ODS Subcommittee of the Clean Air Act 

Services Steering Committee

Mack MacFarland DuPont

Michael Parr DuPont

James Bachman DuPont

Alexander von Bismarck Environmental Investigation Agency

Danielle Gagne, HFC & Climate 

Policy Analyst Environmental Investigation Agency

Marcus Lee, HFC & Climate Policy

Analyst Environmental Investigation Agency

James Wolf Global Policy Associates

Rusty Tharp Goodman Manufacturing

Dave Ransom Goodman Manufacturing

Jon Melchi

Heating Air-conditioning & Refrigeration Distributors 

International (HARDI)

Molly Kelly-Yahner Heather Podesta + Partners

Ben Klein Heather Podesta + Partners

Dave Stirpe Honeywell

Stephen P. Mandracchia Hudson Technologies

Jim Tieken ICOR International

Nanette Lockwood Ingersoll Rand

Steve Porter Johnstone Supply

Kathryn Biszko Keller and Heckman LLP

Peter Williams New Era Group, Inc.
Linda Woolridge New Era Group, Inc.

Jill Tronca North Lakes Distributing

Ben Longstreth Natural Resources Defense Council

W. Caffey Norman Patton Boggs LLP 

Kristina Foehrkolb Patton Boggs LLP 

Jerry Dykstra Rapid Recovery

Brian Conners Safe Disposal Systems, Inc.

James Burke USA Refrigerants

David Silverman Senator Murphy's Office

Karim Amrane

Air-conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute 

(AHRI)

Dennis Tronca North Lakes Distributing

Ken Gaglione Honeywell
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 D0 29 0 . KENNETH COCKRELL v . THE STATE.

A j u ry fo u n d K e n n et h Co ck rel l g u il t y o f s ev eral o ffen s es , i n cl u di n g m al i ce

m u rd er, an d h i s co n v i ct i o n s were affi rm ed on ap p eal

. See Co ckr el l v. St a t e , 2 8 1 Ga.

5 3 6 (6 4 0 SE2 d 2 6 2 ) ( 2 0 0 7 )

. Th ereaft er, Co ck rel l fi l ed a “ Pet i t i o n fo r Ap p ro p ri at e

Rel i ef” i n t he t ri al co u rt ch al l en g i n g h i s t ri al co u n s el ’ s fai l u re t o co m m u n i cat e a p l ea

o ffer. T h e t ri al co u rt d i s m i s sed t h e m o t io n , an d Co ck rel l fi l ed t hi s ap p l i cat i o n fo r

d i s cret i o n ary

ap peal

. Un d er o u r Co ns t it u t i o n , t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d ict i o n o v er

“ [a] l l cas es i n wh i ch a s en t en ce o f d eat h was i m p o s ed o r co ul d b e i m

p o s ed .” See Ga.

Co n s t

. of 19 8 3

, A rt

. VI, Sec. VI, P a r

. I II (8 ). Becau s e a p en al t y o f d eat h can b e

i m p o s ed fo r t h e cri m e o f m u rd er, ju ri s d i ct i on i s p r o p e r i n t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

. See

OCGA § 1 7 -1 0 -3 0 (b ); Nea l v. S t a t e , 29 0 G a. 5 6 3

, 5 7 2 (7 22 SE2 d 7 6 5 ) (2 0 1 2 )
(Hu ns t ei n , C. J

., co ncu rri n g ); s ee al s o S t a t e v. Th o r n t o n , 2 53 Ga. 5 2 4 (3 2 2 SE2 d 7 1 1 )
(1 9 8 4) (d i rect i n g t h i s Co u rt t o t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n w h i ch ei t h er a s en t en ce o f d eat h

o r o f l i fe i m

p ri s o n m en t h as been i m

p o s ed up o n co n v i ct i o n of m u rd er”). Acco rd i n g l y , February 06, 2018C ock rel l’ s ap p li cat i o n i s h ereb y T RANSFERRED t o t he Su p rem e Co u rt fo r

d i s p o s i t i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/06/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,387,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,491,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   552,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,845,000
<PP&E>                                       4,077,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,767,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,413,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,866,000
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,332,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,415,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,767,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,274,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                38,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                529,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   191,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            338,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   338,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

__________________________________________

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., ) 

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., ) 

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________)

ORDER DENYING COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S REQUEST

FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING AND RULING 

I.

On October 10, 2023, Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) Complaint Counsel filed a 

motion seeking to extend the fact discovery deadline in this case (“Motion”), together with a 

request to expedite the deadlines for briefing and ruling on the Motion. That same day, 

Respondents Microsoft Corporation and Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Respondents”) filed an 

opposition to Complaint Counsel’s request to expedite. For the reasons set forth below, 

Complaint Counsel’s request to expedite is DENIED. 

II.

FTC Rule of Practice 3.22 provides that responses to a motion are due within 10 days of 

service of the motion. 16 C.F.R. § 3.22(d). A ruling on a motion is then due within 14 days after 

the response is filed. 16 C.F.R. § 3.22(e). Under Rule 4.3(b), the Administrative Law Judge can 

shorten these time periods for good cause shown. 16 C.F.R. § 4.3(b). 

Complaint Counsel fails to articulate any reason for expediting the time for Respondents 

to file a response to the Motion or for issuing a ruling. Moreover, the record does not reveal good 

cause for shortening the applicable time periods. Complaint Counsel’s complaint for a 

preliminary injunction against Respondents’ planned merger, filed in the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of California, pursuant to Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, 15 

U.S.C. § 53(b), was denied on July 10, 2023 and the case is presently on appeal to the Ninth 

Circuit Court of Appeals. By order of the Commission issued on September 26, 2023, the 

evidentiary hearing in the instant case is not set to commence until 21 days after the Ninth 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/11/2023 OSCAR NO 608743 | PAGE Page 1 of 2 * -PUBLIC 
PUBLIC

2 

Circuit issues its decision. Oral argument on the appeal is not set to take place until December 6, 

2023. Based on the foregoing, Complaint Counsel has failed to demonstrate good cause to 

expedite briefing or a ruling with respect to the Motion. Accordingly, Complaint Counsel’s 

request to expedite is DENIED. 

ORDERED: 

 D. Michael Chappell

 Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: October 11, 2023 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/11/2023 OSCAR NO 608743 | PAGE Page 2 of 2 * -PUBLIC
Aircraft

Supported Battery

DJI 5200mAh LiPo Battery

Weight (Battery & Propellers included)

1242g

Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly)

Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m

Max Yaw Angular Velocity

200°/s

Max Tiltable Angle

35°

Max Ascent / Descent Speed

Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

Max Flight Speed

15m/s (Not Recommended)

Diagonal motor-motor distance

350mm

Gimbal

Working Current

Static : 750mA; Dynamic : 900mA

Control Accuracy

±0.03°

Controllable Range

Pitch : -90°-0°

Maximum Angular Speed

Pitch : 90°/s

Camera Operating Environment Temperature

0 -40 °C °C

Sensor size

1/2.3"
Effective Pixels

14 Megapixels

Resolution

4384×3288

HD Recording

1080p30 & 720p

Recording FOV

110° / 85°

Remote 

Control

Operating Frequency

5.728 GHz-5.85 GHz

Communication Distance (open area)

CE Compliance: 400m; FCC Compliance: 800m

Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

-93dBm

Transmitter Power

CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW

Working Voltage

120 mA@3.7V

Built-in LiPo Battery Working Current/Capacity

3.7V, 2000mAh

Range 

Extender

Operating Frequency

2412-2462MHz

Communication Distance (open area)

500-700m

Transmitter Power

20dBm

Power Consumption

2W

DJI VISION System Requirement Of Mobile Device
App

iOS version 6.1 or above/ Android system version 4.0 or above

Mobile Device Support

• iOS recommended: iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, 

iPod touch 5 (available but not recommended: iPad 3, iPad 4, iPad mini) 

• Android recommended: Samsung Galaxy S3, S4, Note 2, Note 3 or phones of 

similar configuration
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40810 Su m m ar y Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f –A pp el l ee,
v. RO N AL D LYM U EL , a l s o kno w n a s Li t t l e Ron , D efen d a n t–A p p ell a n t.
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 05- C R

- 2- 4
B e fo r e G A R Z A , D E N N IS , a n dO W E N , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * Th e at t or ney appoi nt ed t o r epr es ent R onal d Lym uel has m ove d f orl eave t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ersv. C a lif o rn ia , 386 U
. S
. 738 ( 196 7)
. L ym u elha s not fil e d a res pon se. O u r i n dep en den trevi ew of th e re c o r da n dco u n s e l’ s b r ie f d is c lo s e s n o n o n fr iv o lo u s is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d in g ly , c o u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is G R A N T E D , co u n s e l is e x c u s e df

r o m f u r t h e rr e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n dt h e AP P EA L I S DI S M I S S ED
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Jul y 28, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code), the undersigned officer of SCOLR Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To
my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|               |  |  | 
|March 29, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Stephen J. Turner  
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  | Stephen J. Turner,     
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,795,754
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,426,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,144,661
<PP&E>                                      52,028,667
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,896,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,522,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,509,013
<BONDS>                                     32,065,040
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,447,387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,522,430
<SALES>                                      5,072,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,530,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,276,884
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,488,307
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,264,688
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                551,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            551,880
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   551,880
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Cleo B. MILLER v. Carl YOUNG and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company.

No. 61122.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1977.

In re: Cleo B. Miller applying for certio-rari, or writ or review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 350 So .2d 976.

Denied.
STATE OF IDAHO

DEPARTMENT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

1410 North Hilton • Boise, Idaho 83706 . (208) 373-0502 G.L. "Butch" Otter, Governor

Curt Fransen, Director

December 14, 2012

Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator

USEPA Region 10, MS RA-140

1200 Sixth Avenue

Seattle, WA 98101

RECEIVED

DEC 19 2012

Office

of The ye 11ve

Dear Mr. McLerran:

On behalf of the State of Idaho, the Department of Environmental Quality hereby submits the Cache

Valley Idaho PM2.5 Nonattainment Area State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Logan (UT-ID)

nonattainment area pursuant to Section 110(a)(2)(I) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

In accordance with Section 110(a)(2)of the CAA, the State of Idaho provided the public with

reasonable notice and a hearing on the SIP. Notice for the comment period (October 30 through

November 30, 2012) and the public hearing (November 29, 2012) was posted on the DEQ website and

in local papers. Documentation of the public comment and hearing and DEQ's response to public

comment has been added to Appendix F of the SIP. The enclosed SIP is unchanged from the plan

provided for public comment because none of the written or oral comment received required

substantive changes to the plan.

The states of Idaho and Utah along with EPA Region 10 and Region 8 have cooperated throughout the

development of this SIP. DEQ would like to thank your staff for their continued willingness to provide

support and thoughtful input as this project progressed.

An original and one electronic copy of these documents are being provided to you and your staff. If

you have any questions concerning Idaho's submittal, please contact Melissa Gibbs, Airshed

Coordinator, Pocatello Regional Office, (208) 236-6160. For any questions of a legal nature, please

contact Lisa Carlson, Deputy Attorney General at (208) 373-0494.

Sincerely,

Curt Fransen

Director

c: Jeff Hunt, EPA, Air Planning Unit

Tiffany Floyd, DEQ Administrator, Air Quality

Robert Wilkosz, DEQ, Manager, Mobile and Area Source Program
#### LAKEVIEW INVESTMENT CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Daniel LAVEN, joined by his wife, Elsie Laven, Appellees.

No. 70-132.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 22, 1970.

Rehearing Denied July 20, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7783 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7783

  To amend the CARES Act to expand a national awareness and outreach 
 campaign to address the importance and safety of plasma donation, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2020

  Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Wenstrup) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the CARES Act to expand a national awareness and outreach 
 campaign to address the importance and safety of plasma donation, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Plasma Donation Awareness Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. IMPORTANCE OF THE BLOOD AND PLASMA SUPPLY.

    (a) In General.--Section 3226 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) 
is amended--
            (1) in the section heading after ``blood'' by inserting 
        ``and plasma''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``blood'' each time it appears ``and 
        plasma''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The item relating to section 3226 in the 
table of contents in section 2 of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) is 
amended to read as follows:

``Sec. 3226. Importance of the blood and plasma supply.''.
                                 <all>
```