alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)August 12, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)August 11, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn August 11, 2014, we and ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) announced we will participate in the Tuohy Brothers Annual Energy Conference on Tuesday, August 12, 2014, in New York City.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The materials utilized at the conference were made available on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites,www.oneok.comandwww.oneokpartners.com, on Tuesday, August 12, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated August 11, 2014.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:August 12, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated August 11, 2014.











4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,611
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              66
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,773
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     38,481
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,133
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,194
<LOANS>                                        100,753
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 161,472
<DEPOSITS>                                     140,651
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,144
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                901
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,045
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 161,472
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,414
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,415
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   251
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,080
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,494
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,603
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,477
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      103
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,512
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,512
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,021
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.80
<LOANS-NON>                                        482
<LOANS-PAST>                                       174
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,218
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      262
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,069
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,069
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             31
        

</TABLE>
>>> "Baldi, Sara Marie" <SaraMarie.Baldi@genon.com> 11/20/2012 8:16 AM >>>

Good morning, TJ

Mark & I had the usual Monday “fires” to address yesterday but confirmed with him this morning that the presentation and the cost 

of the piping no longer need to remain as CBI. However, please be aware that the estimated cost of the piping is solely for the 

piping.

Please feel free to contact me with any questions.

Sara Marie 

GenOn Energy 

Env Operations & Compliance

work: 724-597-8633

cell: 724-263-9276 

From: Thomas Finseth [mailto:Thomas.Finseth@erg.com] 

Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:09 PM

To: alicea.jezebele@epa.gov; Baldi, Sara Marie

Cc: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov; Jacklin, Mark J

Subject: RE: Draft Keystone Site Visit Notes

Hi Sara Marie,

Just following up on the potential CBI claim. Please let me know as soon as you can.

Thanks,

TJ

>>> "Baldi, Sara Marie" <SaraMarie.Baldi@genon.com> 11/16/2012 10:28 AM >>>

Good morning, T.J.

I need to confer with Mark and others as to whether these should remain as CBI. Mark is out of the office today, but will get back 

to you on Monday when he is back in the office.

Have a great weekend.

Sara Marie 

GenOn Energy 

Env Operations & Compliance

work: 724-597-8633

cell: 724-263-9276

From: Thomas Finseth [mailto:Thomas.Finseth@erg.com] 

Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 9:58 AM

To: alicea.jezebele@epa.gov; Baldi, Sara Marie

Cc: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov; Jacklin, Mark J

Subject: RE: Draft Keystone Site Visit Notes

Sara Marie,

Thank you for providing responses to the questions included in the notes. I have reviewed your responses and have just a couple 

questions/requests.

1) Please confirm whether the presentation included in the attachments needs to be held as confidential business information (CBI).

2) Please confirm that the estimated cost of the piping provided in response to our question is not considered CBI.

Thanks again.

TJ Finseth
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7982 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7982

 To reject the People's Republic of China's claims concerning certain 
       islands and territories in the East and South China Seas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 7, 2020

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reject the People's Republic of China's claims concerning certain 
       islands and territories in the East and South China Seas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting United States Hegemony By 
Attacking China's Kleptomania Act'' or the ``PUSHBACK Act''.

SEC. 2. REJECTION OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA'S CLAIMS CONCERNING 
              CERTAIN ISLANDS AND TERRITORIES IN THE EAST AND SOUTH 
              CHINA SEAS.

    (a) Rejection of Claims.--The United States hereby rejects the 
People's Republic of China's claims concerning certain islands and 
territories in the East and South China Seas, to include the following:
            (1) The Senkaku Islands.
            (2) The Spratly Islands.
            (3) Scarborough Shoal.
            (4) The Paracel Islands.
            (5) All other disputed islands and territories in the East 
        and South China Seas.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be construed 
to--
            (1) resolve any claims made by any country, except for the 
        People's Republic of China, prior to the date of the enactment 
        of this section; and
            (2) impact claims made by the Republic of China concerning 
        islands and territories described in subsection (a).
    (c) Support for Freedom of Navigation Operations.--It is the policy 
of the United States to support efforts to increase the number of 
freedom of navigation operations conducted by the United States Navy 
with allies of the United States in the East and South China Seas.
                                 <all>
```
#### Cecil W. KIRKLAND, Petitioner, v. Hon. Warren H. EDWARDS, Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, Division A, Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-814.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1971.

Louis R. Bowen, Jr., Public Defender, and Maurice Paul, Asst. Public Defender, Orlando, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in this court for a writ of prohibition. The writ *526is denied and the Rule Nisi heretofore entered is discharged on the authority of Woodward v. Edwards, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 244 So.2d 438, opinion filed December 11, 1970.

WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
#### Harry LAMBERT, Appellant, v. PERSONNEL BOARD OF the CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, Florida, and City of Miami Beach, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-543.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 12, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 23.8

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                           
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
on Form S-8 (333-01574), (333-12789) and (333-24581); on Form S-3 (333-10383) 
and (333-14025); and on Form S-4 (333-13133) of our report dated February 8, 
1996 with respect to the financial statements of The Re-Print Corporation for 
the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 of U.S. Office Products Company's 
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the year ended April 26, 
1997.

/s/BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
August 18, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40655

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANTONIO GARCIA-ALBA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:17-CR-817-1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antonio GarciaAlba has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Alba has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 28, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40655 Document: 00514812252 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/28/2019
No. 18-40655

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40655 Document: 00514812252 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/28/2019
#### Sweeney BENOIT, as Personal Representative of William Benoit, Jr. v. FIREMAN’S FUND INS. CO., Standby Crews, Inc., and Deepwater Boats, Inc.

No. 60336.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Sweeney Benoit, as personal representative of Wm. Benoit, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Cameron. 347 So.2d 269.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000865084
<NAME> OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,141
<SECURITIES>                                   635,743
<RECEIVABLES>                                  275,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,514
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,126,675
<PP&E>                                         273,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                 125,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,390,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,040,885
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           795
<OTHER-SE>                                     348,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,390,101
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,251,264
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,916,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (431,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (140,323)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (291,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (291,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.70)
        

</TABLE>
#### SECURITY TRANSPORT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED OUTDOOR CLUBS, INC., Appellee.

No. 73-607.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 21, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluate d with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regar ding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs ca n be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- AT SDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737. ***Final Si te *** March 2012


### COMPASS PLAZA WELL T CE Rogersville, Missouri Greene County

 **Site Location :**  The Compass Plaza Well TCE site is located on the western edge of the city of Rogersville , Missouri.

 **Site History:**
The Comp ass Plaza Well TCE site consists of contaminated ground water that has contaminated domestic and irrigation wells. The site includes a small cluster of wells in Greene County near Compass Plaza, a commercial area of Rogersville. Following public drinking w ater monitoring by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), trichloroethene (TCE) was detected in the Compass Plaza strip mall drinking water well and at two nearby public wells.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:**

The contaminant of concern i s TCE in the soil and ground water.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment :**  There are three municipal wells within four miles of the site. Rogersville City Well #2 is only used for monitoring purposes. The Census of Missouri Public Wate r Systems lists the population served by the City of Rogersville’s two public wells as 1,500 people. The two wells used for production (Wells #1 and #4) are located between 1

- 2 miles of the site. Additionally, there are 13 community and non- community wells and 557 private wells within four miles of the site.

 **Response Activities (to date):**
Of the 557 private wells within a four mile radius, approximately 235 have been sampled. TCE was detected in the Compass Plaza strip mall drinking water well and in 13 private drinking water wells. Of these 13 private drinking water wells, six have shown TCE levels above EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). The EPA has provided water treatment systems to those residents whose private wells are contaminated with TCE above the MCL.

The EPA, in cooperation with MDNR, the Greene County Resource Management and the Natural Resource Conservation Service, capped a well with high concentrations of TCE to protect ground water resources. These same agencie s also oversaw the construction of a new drinking water well

.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**

The S tate of Missouri referred th e site to the EPA. O ther federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated , but they are not viable at this time

. The EPA received a le tter from the state supporting the listing of the site to the NPL.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of the Secretary 

April 24, 2006 

Kathryn Fenton, Esq.

Montgomery Kosma, Esq.

Jones Day

51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20001-1700

Re: The Procter & Gamble Company and The Gillette Company 

Docket No. C-4151 

Dear Ms. Fenton and Mr. Kosma: 

This letter responds to the February 28, 2006, Divestiture Petition (“Petition”) of The 

Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) requesting that the Commission approve P&G’s proposed 

divestiture of the APDO Assets to The Dial Corporation (“Dial”), pursuant to the order in this 

matter. The application was placed on the public record for comments until March 29, 2005, and 

no comments were received. 

After consideration of the proposed divestiture as set forth in the Petition and 

supplemental documents, as well as other available information, the Commission has determined 

to approve the proposed divestiture of the APDO Assets to Dial. In according its approval, the 

Commission has relied upon the information submitted and representations made in connection 

with P&G’s Petition, and has assumed them to be accurate and complete. 

By direction of the Commission, Chairman Majoras not participating, and Commissioner 

Harbour and Commissioner Kovacic recused. 

Donald S. Clark 

Secretary 

cc: Steven Kaiser, Esq.

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP

2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

June 27, 2022

The Bhartiya tv

thebhartiyatv@gmail.com 

Re: In the Matter of Health Research Laboratories, LLC, et al., FTC Dkt. No. 9397 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent 

agreement in the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment 

and placed it on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii). 

In your comment, you indicate agreement with the consent agreement and stated “yes we 

need to focus on health.” You do not propose any revisions to the consent agreement. 

Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission has determined that the relief set 

forth in the consent agreement is appropriate and sufficient to remedy the violations alleged in 

the complaint. Specifically, the proposed Order in the consent agreement prohibits Respondents 

from selling or advertising any dietary supplements and from making any disease prevention, 

reduction of risk, cure, mitigation, or treatment advertising claims in the future. The Order also 

requires that representations about the health benefits, safety, performance or efficacy of any 

Food or Drug be non-misleading and substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence. 

At this time, the Commission has determined that the public interest would be served by 

issuing the Decision and Order in final form without modification. The final Decision and Order 

and other relevant materials are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov. It

helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, and we thank you 

again for your comment. 

By direction of the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary