alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 9, 2010 | /s/ Donald W. Barney                             |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Donald W. Barney                                 |
|                               | President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6106

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

ALVIS LUTHER EVANS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (5:03-cr-00043-H-1) 

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thomas Peter McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Alvis Luther Evans appeals the district court’s denial 

of his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. United States v. Evans, No. 5:03-cr00043-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      470
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,736
<PP&E>                                          25,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,714)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,633
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,520
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,633
<SALES>                                          1,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,910
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
No. 00-722.

#### Mills et al. *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Heavy-Duty Hybrid Onboard Diagnostics

FROM: Amy Kopin

TO: The Docket

DATE: July 15, 2011

On July 6th, 2011 we held a conference call with the California Air Resources Board 

(CARB) to discuss concerns raised by hybrid manufacturers, engine manufacturers, and related 

industry trade groups regarding heavy-duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and timing. 

Concerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy-duty greenhouse gas notice of 

proposed rulemaking that heavy-duty hybrid applications may not be able to meet the 2013 

heavy-duty OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Rulemaking.

1,2

 

Specifically, manufacturers have requested a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements 

for hybrid applications until 2020. Attendees from the EPA and CARB are shown in the table 

below.

Attendee Affiliation 

Cleophas Jackson EPA – Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

Anthony Neam EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Amy Kopin EPA – Assessment and Standards Division 

Lucina Negrete CARB

Jessica Dean CARB

Michael McCarthy CARB

Michael Regenfuss CARB

 

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Mediumand Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: 

http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-12-29/html/2010-32726.htm

2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule 

Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy-Duty Engines Used in Highway 

Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions to Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy-Duty 

Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd-obd-frm-02-24-09-notice-74-fr-8310.pdf

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
#### Gregg Edward DUTCHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
HD GHG Phase 1 2013 http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2013/hdghg2013/hdghg2013.htm

1 of 4 6/17/2015 2:51 PM
HD GHG Phase 1 2013 http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2013/hdghg2013/hdghg2013.htm

2 of 4 6/17/2015 2:51 PM
HD GHG Phase 1 2013 http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2013/hdghg2013/hdghg2013.htm

3 of 4 6/17/2015 2:51 PM
HD GHG Phase 1 2013 http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2013/hdghg2013/hdghg2013.htm

4 of 4 6/17/2015 2:51 PM
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee: 
Change

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting: Change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Federal Register notice that was originally published 
on May 8, 2018, (Volume 83, Number 89, Page 20913) the meeting date has 
changed. The date is changed from Wednesday, June 27, 2018 to Thursday, 
June 28, 2018.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, June 28, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Thursday, June 28, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. For more information please 
contact Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or (214) 413-6523, or write TAP 
Office, 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments 
to the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: June 6, 2018.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-12579 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.:





We consent to the use of our reports dated March 7, 2014, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, incorporated herein by reference.


/s/ KPMG LLP


Columbus, Ohio


June 26, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7726 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7726

   To permit child care providers that receive payment for services 
 provided under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 
   to use a portion of such payment to purchase personal protective 
  equipment, and other equipment, necessary to protect the health of 
             participating children and child care workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2020

 Ms. Mucarsel-Powell introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit child care providers that receive payment for services 
 provided under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 
   to use a portion of such payment to purchase personal protective 
  equipment, and other equipment, necessary to protect the health of 
             participating children and child care workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Protection In Childcare 
Act'' or the ``EPIC Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT TO PROTECT 
              THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN WHO RECEIVE CERTAIN CHILD CARE 
              SERVICES.

    A child care provider who receives payment for services provided 
under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 
9857 et seq.) may use a portion of such payment to purchase personal 
protective equipment, and other equipment, necessary to protect the 
health of children who receive such services and child care workers who 
provide such services.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 4.2

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                      CLEVELAND ELECTRIC FINANCING TRUST I

         THIS CERTIFICATE OF TRUST of Cleveland Electric Financing Trust I (the
"Trust"), dated June 7, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the
undersigned, as trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business
Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801 et seq.).

         1. NAME. The name of the business trust being created hereby is
Cleveland Electric Financing Trust I.

         2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of
the Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware is The
Bank of New York (Delaware), White Clay Center, Route 273, Newark, Delaware
19711.

         3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of
its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the only trustees of the
Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above
written.

                                      THE BANK OF NEW YORK,
                                             not in its individual capacity but
                                             solely as Property Trustee

                                      By:    /s/ Terence T. Rawlins
                                             -----------------------
                                             Terence T. Rawlins
                                             Vice President


                                      THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
                                             not in its individual capacity but
                                             solely as Delaware Trustee

                                      By:    /s/ Michael Santino
                                             -------------------
                                             Michael Santino
                                             Senior Vice President

                                      /s/ Thomas Navin
                                      ----------------
                                      Thomas Navin,
                                             not in his individual capacity but
                                             solely as Administrative Trustee

                                      /s/ Randy Scilla
                                      ----------------
                                      Randy Scilla,
                                             not in his individual capacity but
                                             solely as Administrative Trustee
#### Barbara Jacobs, Appellant, v 200 East 36th Owners Corp. et al., Respondents.

[722 NYS2d 137]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered November 24, 1999, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants residential cooperative’s and managing agent’s motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing plaintiff tenant/shareholder’s causes of action for breach of the warranty of quiet enjoyment (1st), harassment (8th, 11th, 14th), intentional infliction of emotional distress (12th), fraud (16th), and claim for punitive damages under her cause of action for breach of the warranty of habitability (10th), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The cause of action for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment was properly dismissed upon evidence establishing that there was neither an actual nor constructive eviction *(Herstein Co. v Columbia Pictures Corp.,*4 NY2d 117, 121). The causes of action for harassment were properly dismissed since New York does not recognize such a cause of action *(Goldstein v Tabb,*177 AD2d 470, 471, *lv denied*80 NY2d 753). We would add with respect to the fourteenth cause of action, based on the coop’s promulgation of a rule prohibiting deliveries of food by placing the food packages on the floor of the elevator and sending the elevator to shareholders’ floors and requiring residents to pick up food deliveries in the lobby, that the record is devoid of evidence that such action was not in furtherance of legitimate concerns for safety and cleanliness *(see, Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp.,*75 NY2d 530, 539). The cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress, based on the coop’s failure to unscrew a lightbulb in plaintiffs apartment for four days, does not allege conduct so extreme and outrageous as to be beyond all possible bounds of decency *(see, Fischer v Maloney,*43 NY2d 553, 557). The cause of action for fraud, based upon Board members’ alleged statements concerning noise in the building and the building’s water pressure made during their interview of plaintiff in connection with her purchase application, is not sustainable absent evidence that such statements were known to be false *(see, Lama Hold*
      *282
      *ing Co. v Smith Barney,*88 NY2d 413, 421). Plaintiffs cause of action for breach of the warranty of habitability, alleging defendants’ refusal to enforce House Rules and to remedy noise, low water pressure and other unpleasant living conditions in the building, does not show conduct so “morally reprehensible” as to warrant an award of punitive damages *(see, New York Univ. v Continental Ins. Co.,*87 NY2d 308, 315). We have considered plaintiffs other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli, Andrias and Rubin, JJ.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 1, 11/2013



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 12/31/2013 Sample Number: 135092-001 Date Collected:12/18/2013 Date Received:12/20/2013 

### Trip Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 0.2 0.5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.2 12/26/2013 J 

### Sample Number: 135092-002 Date Collected:12/18/2013 Date Received:12/20/2013 

### Field Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.2 0.5 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.2 12/26/2013 U 

### Sample Number: 135092-003 Date Collected:12/18/2013 Date Received:12/20/2013 

### Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 15.9 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 12/26/2013 

### Sample Number: 135092-004 Date Collected:12/20/2013 Date Received:12/20/2013 

### Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 15.1 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 12/26/2013 

### Sample Number: 135092-005 Date Collected:12/18/2013 Date Received:12/20/2013 

## CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 141 20 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 8 12/26/2013 

### Sample Number: 135092-006 Date Collected:12/18/2013 Date Received:12/20/2013 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 6.0 2 JAB EPA 1631E-2002 0.8 12/26/2013

Mountaineer Plant, 135092 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 12/31/2013

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 135092 Page 2 of 2
FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
                           FORM 10-Q - MARCH 31, 2005

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Union Real Estate Equity and
Mortgage Investments (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three month period
ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2005                                       /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Michael L. Ashner
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


Date: May 13, 2005                                       /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Thomas Staples
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                       42
#### E. B. PIRTLE and Georgia C. Pirtle, his wife, Appellants, v. Denzel B. FORAKER, Appellee.

No. 70-887.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; William G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.