alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 815 

To provide, in the event of a Government shutdown during fiscal year 2019, 

continuing appropriations to members and employees of the Coast Guard 

and law enforcement officers and custom and border protection officers 

within the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To provide, in the event of a Government shutdown during 

fiscal year 2019, continuing appropriations to members 

and employees of the Coast Guard and law enforcement 

officers and custom and border protection officers within 

the Department of Homeland Security, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pay our Homeland 

5 Heroes Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 815 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR COAST GUARD 

2 AND LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS AND 

3 CUSTOM AND BORDER PROTECTION OFFI4 CERS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

5 SECURITY. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—There are hereby appropriated for 

7 fiscal year 2019, out of any money in the Treasury not 

8 otherwise appropriated, for any period during which in9 terim or full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2019 are 

10 not in effect— 

11 (1) such sums as are necessary to provide pay 

12 and allowances to members and employees of the 

13 Coast Guard; and 

14 (2) such sums as are necessary to provide the 

15 salary and expenses of any law enforcement officer 

16 (as that term is defined in section 8401(17) of title 

17 5, United States Code) or customs and border pro18 tection officer (as that term is defined in section 

19 8401(36) of such title) within the Department of 

20 Homeland Security. 

21 (b) AVAILABILITY.—Appropriations and funds made 

22 available and authority granted pursuant to subsection (a) 

23 shall be available until whichever of the following first oc24 curs: 

25 (1) The enactment into law of an appropriation 

26 (including a continuing appropriation) for any purVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:11 Feb 05, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H815.IH H815

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 815 IH

1 pose for which amounts are made available in sub2 section (a). 

3 (2) The enactment into law of the applicable 

4 regular or continuing appropriations resolution or 

5 other Act without any appropriation for such pur6 pose. 

7 (c) BACKPAY.—With respect to the period of a lapse 

8 in the appropriations described in subsection (a) beginning 

9 on or around December 22, 2018, and ending on the date 

10 of enactment of this Act, compensation provided by this 

11 section shall be considered to be payments made in accord12 ance with subsection (c) of section 1341 of title 31, United 

13 States Code, as added by the Government Employee Fair 

14 Treatment Act of 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE of Florida DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DIVISION OF FAMILY SERVICES, Appellant, v. Ione Nadine McQUAGE In re Adoption, Appellee.

No. Q-347.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 13, 1973.

Chester G. Senf and Robert J. Horne, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Charles R. Hess, Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the record on appeal in this cause, briefs, and oral arguments, the Court finds that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The judgment appealed from is, therefore, affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., WIGGINTON, J., and POWELL, GILLIS E., Associate Judge, concur.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 3 35

- C R , 01

- 14

- 00336

- CR

Style: Damion Gentry v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : September 25 , 201 4

Type of motion: Motion for E xtension of T ime to F ile Reporter’s Record

Party filing motion: Court reporter

Document to be filed: Reporter’ s Record

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: June 16 , 201 4

Number of extensions granted: 3 Current Due date: September 16 , 2014

Date Requested: Octob er 1 0 , 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Though the court reporter requested an extension until October 10, 2014, to file

the reporter’s record s in both cases, she apparently filed both of them on

September 29, 2014. Accordingly, the motion is dismissed as moot. Because the

clerk’s record was filed in both cases, the record is complete. Appellant’s brief is

ordered to be filed within 30 days of the filing of the reporter’s record. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a)( 2). The State’s brief, if any, is due within 30 days of the filing of

appellant’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: September 30, 2014
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00134-CV

WOODGLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellant

v.

Rachel V. ODOM,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-15443

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is reversed 

and the matter is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this court’s 

opinion. Specifically, we remand for rendition of judgment that includes an order of sale. 

We order that appellant Woodglen Homeowners Association recover its costs of appeal, if 

any, from appellee Rachel V. Odom. 

SIGNED November 26, 2014.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Wilkow Venture (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc R. Wilkow,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Marc R. Wilkow
--------------

Marc R. Wilkow
Chief Executive Officer

DATED: May 9, 2003



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Wilkow Venture (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas Harrigan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Thomas Harrigan
---------------

Thomas Harrigan
Chief Financial Officer

DATED: May 9, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Terry D. Wall, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                            
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
  and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
  presented.

|                           | 
|-------------------------- | 
|Dated:
  December 14, 2007 | 
|                          
|/s/ Terry D.
  Wall        | 
|                           | 
|Terry D.
  Wall            | 
|Chief Executive Officer    | 

63


---
#### STATE of Florida, ex rel., Robert Otto JOENSEN, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-336.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### HERBIN PAINT AND BODY WORK, INC., and Allstate Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Angel DIAZ et al., Appellees.

No. 73-1324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1973.

' PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### Request for Inform ation FAA-2016-3774 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Huey: This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2016-3774). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to p rocess your petition. Per the Notice to Section 333 of the FAA Moderni zation and Reform Act of 2012 Petitioners Regarding Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, part 107 letter poste d to your docket, we have review ed your original request and found you will be able to operate under part 107 without further relief (Tier 1). Your petition will be closed and you will be able operate in accordance with part 107 on the effectiv e date of August 29, 2016). However, we have identified a request to conduct ope rations outside of the United States. In addition to the applicable regulations of the fo reign country, operators of U.S.-regis tered aircraft will need to seek relief from the provisions of Part91, Subpart H of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations to conduct operations outside of the United States. Please confirm your intention to pursu e operations outside of the United States as a comment to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information is submitte d, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking number along with the information subm itted to the docket via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any fu rther, we must receive the information described above by 9/16/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Friday , September 02, 2016 9:33 AM To: Craig@CraigHueyPhotography.com Page 1 of 1 Request for Information FAA -201 6 -377 4

9 /2 / 201 6 https://email.dot.gov/owa/ 9 -AWA -AV S -333Exemptions@faa.gov/? ae=Item&t=IPM.Note &

...
Opinion issued October 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00794-CR

———————————

IN RE ISMAEL NARANJO, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Ismael Naranjo, acting pro se, has filed an amended petition for writ 

of mandamus requesting that we (1) compel the district court clerk to transmit 

relator’s “Motion to Obtain Documents and Trial Records In Forma Pauperis” to 

the convicting trial court and (2) compel the trial court to “issue an order 
2

compelling discovery in said cause of action.” * We deny the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

*

The underlying case is State of Texas v. Ismael Naranjo, cause number 1142607, 

in the 184th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Jan Krocker 

presiding.
#### PIGGLY WIGGLY OPERATORS WAREHOUSE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Larry ROSSITER et ux., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11692.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Nov. 16, 1971.

Nolan Harper, Shreveport, for appellant.

Johnston, Johnston & Thornton, by James J. Thornton, Jr., Shreveport, for Larry *111Rossiter and Martha J. Rossiter, defendants-appellees.

Before AYRES, BOLIN and PRICE, JJ-

AYRES, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of Larry Rossiter et ux v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, bearing No. 11691 of the docket of this court and with which it was consolidated and this day decided, 255 So.2d 103.

This is an action for damages sustained to plaintiff’s International pickup truck which was involved in the accident which gave rise to the companion case. An estimate of the cost of the repairs was made in the sum of $895, after which the salvage was sold for the sum of $100. In the event of plaintiff’s recovery, the amount due plaintiff was stipulated in the sum of $795.

Plaintiff’s demands were rejected by the trial court, and from the judgment plaintiff appealed.

For the reasons assigned hereinabove and in the opinion in the companion case, the judgment appealed is reversed; and

It is now ordered, adjudged, and decreed there be judgment herein in favor of plaintiff, Piggly Wiggly Operators Warehouse, Inc., against Larry Rossiter and Mrs. Martha J. Rossiter, in solido, for the full sum of $795, with legal interest thereon from judicial demand until paid, and for all costs.

Reversed and rendered.

BOLIN, J., dissents with written reasons.

BOLIN, Judge

(dissenting).

For the reasons assigned in the dissenting opinion in the companion case, I dissent from the majority decision reversing the judgment of the trial court.

I respectfully dissent.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

Computation of Earnings Per Share
---------------------------------

The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001 and
2000, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.

Earnings Per Share

Net Income/
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   Three months ended
                                     September 30,
                               -------------------------
                                   2001          2000
                               -----------    ----------
<S>                             <C>            <C>
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding              1,538,443      1,538,443
Net Income                        638,858        603,940
Per Share Amount                      .42            .39
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                    Nine months ended
                                       September 30,
                               -------------------------
                                   2001          2000
                               -----------    ----------
<S>                             <C>            <C>
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding              1,538,443      1,538,443
Net Income                      1,824,241      1,748,343
Per Share Amount                     1.19           1.14
</TABLE>

No common stock equivalents exist.
#### Sidney M. DUBBIN, Petitioner, v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF the UNITED STATES, etc., Respondent.

No. 39875.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 693.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

    BEIJING GEHUA CABLE TV NETWORKS CO. LTD. AND BIG SKY NETWORK CANADA LTD.
     TO JOINTLY DEVELOP BROADBAND NETWORK TECHNOLOGY AND TO PROVIDE INTERNET
                     TECHNICAL SERVICES IN THE BEIJING AREA

Beijing Gehua Cable TV Network Co. Ltd. (Party A) is a corporation located in
Metropolitan Beijing Area. The main business of the Company is to provide
Internet services, data transmission and other Internet based value-added
business in the Beijing Area. Big Sky Network Canada Ltd. (Party B) is a private
company, headquartered in Calgary, Alberta, Canada and its main business is to
build high-speed Broadband networks and to provide Internet technology services.
Party B desires to cooperative with Party A and to jointly develop the broadband
technology and to provide broadband network technology services, Internet data
transmissions, and other network value-added technical services in the Beijing
Area. Big Sky Network Canada Ltd. has gained valuable experiences and developed
special expertise that learned from its two joint ventures successfully launched
at Shekou in Guangdong Province, and Chengdu, in Sichuan Province and that could
be applied in Beijing Area. Based on the spirit of friendly cooperation and
mutual development, after discussions and negotiations, both Parties agreed that
there is huge market and enormous business potential to provide aforementioned
services in the Beijing Area. In addition, the Parties reached the following
consensus:

         1.   Both Parties agreed to cooperate and to jointly  develop  Internet
              data  transmission  and broadband  network  services  based on the
              Cable TV networks of Beijing Area (the Project).

         2.   At the initial stage of the Project,  Party A will build a two-way
              testing HFC network that is not less than 10,000 cable subscribers
              to be used for the Project.  The  building  cost will be the Party
              A's responsibility.

         3.   Party B will  provide  the  equipment,  technology,  capital,  and
              personnel for the Project.

         4.   The  Parties  will make the  testing  network to be  operated as a
              commercial network within three months after its launching date.

         5.   The Parties will continue their  discussion for further and deeper
              cooperation of the Project.

         6.   This  Memorandum  of  Understanding  is  written  in  the  Chinese
              language and four (4) original copies were made.


BEIJING GEHUA CABLE TV                             BIG SKY NETWORK CANADA LTD.
NETWORKS CO., LTD.

/s/ MIN TAN NG                                     /s/ LU WANG
------------------------                           -------------------------
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE                          AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE

DATE: June 18, 2001                                 DATE: June 18, 2001
#### George TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-271.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 28, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Norman J. Kapner, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and oral argument, we are of the opinion that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See State v. Contreras, Fla.1969, 227 So.2d 306; State v. Wright, Fla. 1969, 224 So.2d 300.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., MAGER, J., and Mc-LANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           State or Other
                                          Jurisdiction of  Percentage
                                           Incorporation   Ownership
                                           -------------   ---------
<S>                                        <C>             <C>
Parent
------

Community Financial Corp.                   Illinois         100%


Subsidiary (1)
----------

Community Bank & Trust, N.A.                United States    100%

Subsidiaries of Community Bank &
 Trust, N.A. (1)
--------------------------------

Olney Savings Service Corporation           Illinois         100%
</TABLE>

--------------------
(1)  The assets, liabilities and operations of the subsidiaries are included in
     the consolidated financial statements contained in the Annual Report to
     Stockholders attached hereto as an exhibit.