alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p^r- c^r'2X)oo-(ffth3 

,-^.., , 3^- p I 

ORTATIC 

'.H o?^m 

mi j^,:'t£5 P 1:2^ 

'Ka 'Ofiana O %a(aupapa 

"E Ho'ohanohano a E Ho'omau... 

...To Honor and To Perpetuate'' 

PO Box nil , Kalaapapa, Hawaii 96742 

January 18, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief, Essential Air Services Division 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE - W86-308 

Washington, DC 20590 

dennis. devany@dot. gov 

Sent via email 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Ka 'Ghana O Kalaupapa is a nonprofit organization made up of Kalaupapa residents, 

family members and friends. Our mission is to advocate for the residents, educate the 

public and assist with the preservation of history of this very important community. I am 

writing on behalf of the Board of Directors which includes four Kalaupapa residents, six 

family members/descendants and two longtime friends. 

As you know, Kalaupapa is a remote peninsula where access is only by hiking/riding 

mules on a steep three-mile cliff trail or by small plane. 

All the residents living at Kalaupapa are able to fly, although some need assistance. 

However, because many are elderly, they can no longer hike the cliff trail - so the only 

other way to get in and out of Kalaupapa is on the small planes. A few years ago, airfares 

rose to unaffordable rates: nearly $500 roundtrip between Honolulu and Kalaupapa and 

even nearly $500 between Ho'olehua, Molokai and Kaluapapa (an eight-minute flight). 

The hardship of such high airfares limited the ability of people to conduct personal 

business such as renewing driver's licenses or simply to visit family. 

Many in our 'Ghana want to visit their family or their family graves in Kalaupapa. When 

they were told that the cost of airfare was nearly $500 per person, they were shocked and 

saddened. 
In the short time that Makani Kai has been awarded the EAS subsidy, the Kalaupapa 

community and those who wish to visit Kalaupapa have responded with positive 

comments. Airfares are much more affordable and people are pleased with the service. 

Makani Kai has been especially helpful in working with the community to set its 

schedule to best meet their needs. 

We urge you to allow Makani Kai to continue to receive the EAS subsidy to improve air 

travel to and from Kalaupapa. 

With aloha. 

Valerie Monson, Coordinator 

BCa 'Ghana O Kalaupapa
No. 00-7292.

No. 00-7538.

No. 00-7569.

#### Perry *v.*United Parcel Service. Shull *v.*Bexar County et al. Szerlip *v.*City of Mount Vernon, Ohio.

C. A. 11th Cir.;

Ct. App. Tex., 4th Dist.; and

Ct. App. Ohio, Knox County. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. Petitioners are allowed until March 13, 2001, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
SNODGRASS

Certified Public Accountants and Consultants

EXHIBIT 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary as of September 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month periods
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as
a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be
made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 26, 2009 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|Wheeling, West Virginia  
|November 12, 2009        

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
258 La. 361

#### JACKSON-HINDS BANK v. Wallace M. DAVIS, Jr.

No. 51310.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: National Bank of Commerce in New Orleans applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 244 So.2d 633.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8030 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase certain penalties for 

assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 14, 2020 

Mr. ARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. TIFFANY, Mr. BABIN, Mr. ROY, 

Mr. COOK, Mr. LONG, Mrs. HARTZLER, and Mr. ESTES) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase certain 

penalties for assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain 

officers or employees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ASSAULTING, RESISTING, OR IMPEDING CER4 TAIN OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES. 

5 Section 111 of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘§ 111. Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain offi8 cers or employees 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Whoever knowingly— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8030 IH

1 ‘‘(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, 

2 intimidates, or interferes while performing official 

3 duties, 

4 ‘‘(2) makes physical contact with or has the in5 tent to commit another felony while acting under 

6 paragraph (1), or 

7 ‘‘(3) uses a deadly or dangerous weapon against 

8 (including a weapon intended to cause death or dan9 ger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective 

10 component) or inflicts bodily injury while acting 

11 under paragraph (1), 

12 any officer or employee of the United States or of any 

13 agency in any branch of the United States Government 

14 (including any member of the uniformed services) while 

15 engaged in or on account of the performance of official 

16 duties, or any person who formerly served as a person de17 fined above on account of the performance of official du18 ties during such person’s term of service shall be punished 

19 as provided in subsection (b). 

20 ‘‘(b) PUNISHMENT.—A violation of subsection (a) 

21 shall be punished as follows: 

22 ‘‘(1) For a violation of paragraph (1) of such 

23 subsection, by a fine under this title of not less than 

24 $1,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 1 

25 year, or both. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8030 IH

1 ‘‘(2) For a violation of paragraph (2) of such 

2 subsection, by a fine under this title of not less than 

3 $2,500 or by imprisonment for not more than 10 

4 years, or both. 

5 ‘‘(3) For a violation of paragraph (3) of such 

6 subsection, by a fine under this title of not less than 

7 $10,000 or by mandatory imprisonment, or both.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment Trust
      of
      New Jersey (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2006
      (the “Report”), I, Donald W. Barney, President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:


(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and,


(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                June 8, 2006
            /s/
                Donald W. BarneyDonald
                W. BarneyPresident,
                Treasurer and Chief Financial
                Officer
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),      and, |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      12, 2010 | /s/ Robert S. Hekemian                                 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Robert      S. Hekemian                                |
|                                 | Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                 |                                                   |
EXHIBIT 23.1


             CONSENT OF MITCHELL & TITUS, LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
                          ----------------------------



The Board of Directors of
Digital Mafia Entertainment, LLC


                  We consent to the inclusion on Form 8-K of our report dated
August 23, 1999, with respect to the balance sheets of Digital Mafia
Entertainment, LLC as of December 31, 1997, 1998 and June 17, 1999, and the
related statements of income and retained earnings and cash flows for each of
the years and six month period then ended, which report appears in the report on
Form 8-K/A of Digital Mafia Entertainment, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 3, 1999.




                                                       /s/ MITCHELL & TITUS, LLP
                                                       -------------------------

                                                       Mitchell & Titus, LLP




September 7, 1999
Exhibit 99.4








November 29, 2012Analyst Contact:Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:Brad Borror918-588-7582








ONEOK Partners to Participate in


Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Energy Symposium





TULSA, Okla. - Nov. 29, 2012 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the 11 th Annual Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Energy Symposium in New York City Dec. 4-5, 2012.





John W. Gibson, ONEOK Partners chairman and chief executive officer, will present on Tuesday, Dec. 4, at 10:45 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (9:45 a.m. Central Standard Time).





The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on ONEOK Partners' website, www.oneokpartners.com .  A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days.  The company will also post the presentation on its website that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).








ONEOK Partners , L.P. (pronounced ONE - OAK) (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships , and is a leader in the gathering , processing , storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems , connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company , which owns 43.4 percent of the overall partnership interest.  ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States , and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U . S.





For more information , visit the website at www . oneokpartners . com .





For the latest news about ONEOK Partners , follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners .





# # #
exhibit15.htm










EXHIBIT 15







SUMMARY OF OFFICER AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION












The Employment Agreement in Exhibit 6 of this report is the only written contractual compensation arrangement the Company has with any of its directors and Executive Officers.







During 2014, the Company’s Chief Executive and Principal Financial Officers (the Company’s “Named Executive Officers”) are scheduled to receive the following compensation from the Company:



	
 


Compensation Arrangement

	  	
 


2014 Scheduled Amount


	
Base salary

	  	
$  234,000 (CEO); $109,300 (PFO)


	
401(k) matching contributions

	  	
        6,120 (maximum)


	
Section 125 plan matching contributions (1)

	  	
           600 (maximum)


	
Management bonus

	  	
will be determined at year-end


	
Pet health benefits (1)

	  	
           500 (maximum)


	
Family medical benefits (1)

	  	
will depend on future events


	
Travel expense reimbursement (2)

	  	
       15,000 (CEO); 500 (PFO)


	  	  	  















During 2014, the Company’s Directors are scheduled to receive the following compensation from the Company:








	
Compensation Arrangement

	
Ernst Hoyer

	
Barbara Payne

	
James Beeson


	
Base

	
$  25,000

	
$  25,000

	
$  25,000


	
Executive Committee

	
4,000

	
-

	
-


	
Audit Committee Chairman

	
3,000

	
-

	
-


	
Travel Expense Reimbursement (2)

	
500

	
700

	
500












(1)   CEO and PFO participate on the same basis as other eligible employees.


(2)   Estimated 2014 travel expenses on behalf of UTMD business.  The Company reimburses its employees and directors for authorized business expenses.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust (the Company) for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael L. Ashner, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   | /s/ Michael L. Ashner   | 
|----- | ----------------------- | 
|      |                         | 
|Name: | Michael L. Ashner       | 
|      | Chief Executive Officer | 

August 9, 2007
#### Eddie NAMIE et ux. v. W. M. MILAM & SON, INC.

No. 60844.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 11, 1977.

In re: Eddie Namie, et ux., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Winn. 349 So.2d 996.

Writ denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7860 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to ensure food assistance during a major disaster or emergency 

declared under such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2020 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself and Ms. FUDGE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to ensure food assistance during 

a major disaster or emergency declared under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expanding Access to 

5 Emergency Meals Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO DUPLICATION OF BENEFITS. 

7 Section 312(b) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Re8 lief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5155(b)) 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7860 IH

1 ‘‘(5) EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION ON DUPLICA2 TION OF ASSISTANCE.—During the period of a 

3 major disaster or emergency declared under this Act, 

4 this section shall not prohibit the provision of Fed5 eral assistance under this Act to any person who is 

6 or may be entitled to receive nutrition assistance 

7 through a program administered by the Secretary of 

8 Agriculture, and receipt of such assistance shall not 

9 be considered duplicative assistance, except that a 

10 person receiving benefits (as defined in section 3 of 

11 the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 

12 2012)) under only section 5(h)(1) of the Food and 

13 Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014(h)(1)) may 

14 not simultaneously receive food for distribution to 

15 households authorized under section 413 of this Act 

16 or be certified to receive benefits under section 5(a) 

17 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 

18 2014(a)).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### ROBERT KIEFREIDER AND ASSOCIATES, INC., now known as Kiefreider Advertising, Inc., Appellant, v. Russell K. WILLIAMS, d/b/a Century Typesetting, Appellee.

No. 72-239.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
20

# Failsafes

visual line of sight 400 ft (120 m)

100 ft (30 m) 5 miles (8 km) 400 ft (120 m)

visual line of sight 400 ft (120 m)

100 ft (30 m) 5 miles (8 km) 400 ft (120 m) Low Battery Failsafe Environmental conditions, payload, and flying style can affect power consumption. Use the controller’s flight data display to monitor the voltage of the battery during flight.

If the battery reaches 14 V, the X8 lands automatically at the current position, indicated by a blinking yellow status LED and a quick repeating tone. The X8 is programmed with a set of failsafe behaviors to prevent a crash in the event of a loss of one of the data or communication channels required for flight. Although certain failsafes have assigned LED indicators and tones, it is unlikely that you will be able to see these at a distance. Monitor the ground station for failsafe indications. If a failsafe is triggered, the assigned behavior activates. To override the failsafe behavior, use the controller to switch to standard mode and regain manual control.

RC Controller Signal Failsafe Physical obstructions and interference from nearby wireless signals can affect the X8’s connection with the controller.

If the X8 loses contact with the controller, it returns to the launch point and lands automatically, indicated by a blinking yellow status LED.



## EXHIBIT B - FAILSAFES21 GPS Failsafe The X8 requires GPS lock before takeoff. Enclosed areas, physical obstructions, and lack of available satellites can affect GPS strength. If the X8 loses GPS lock in flight, it triggers a GPS failsafe—indicated by a blinking blue and yellow LED with a high-high-high-low tone—and automatically switch to manual control (standard - altitude hold mode). Always be prepared to regain manual control at any time while flying and choose an unobstructed flying area to improve GPS signal strength. When flying a mission, we recommended changing the GPS failsafe behavior to land. (Visit 3DR.com/X8/info for more information about configuring the GPS failsafe.)

Altitude Failsafe The X8 has a 100 m (328 ft) altitude geofence enabled by default. If the geofence is breached, the X8 automatically switches to RTL. visual line of sight 400 ft (120 m)

100 ft (30 m) 5 miles (8 km) 400 ft (120 m) 

### visual line of sight 400 ft (120 m)

100 ft (30 m) 5 miles (8 km) manual control

100 m (328 ft)

Range Failsafe The X8 has a 300 m (984 ft) horizontal geofence enabled by default. If the X8 travels farther than 300 m from the launch point, it automatically returns to the launch point and lands. If you plan to fly a mission that exceeds this range, you will need to disable the horizontal geofence. (Visit 3DR.com/X8/info for instructions.) The range failsafe is disabled in the event of a GPS failsafe.
Exhibit 31Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 302 Certification     I, Russell A. Cronin, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of National City Credit Card MasterTrust and National City Credit Card Master Note Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);     2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;     4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on myknowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statementrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and     5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York and The Bank of New York (Delaware).March 21, 2008              /s/ Russell A. Cronin, Jr.   Russell A. Cronin, Jr.   Senior Vice President of National City Bank, as Servicer