Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Notices 28251 

with respect to complying with DOT 

regulations, does not materially alter the 

fact that a railroad employee is an 

affected individual. Covered chemical 

facilities must ensure that affected 

individuals have appropriate 

background checks performed, to 

include a check for terrorist ties. This 

ICR allows covered chemical facilities, 

and their service providers that employ 

affected individuals, an opportunity to 

enable a check for terrorist ties to be 

performed against the TSDB. 

Comment: One commenter stated that 

the CFATS PSP, as currently designed, 

‘‘does not take into consideration that 

Tier 3 and 4 facilities present a 

comparatively lower risk profile than 

Tier 1 and 2 sites.’’ The commenter 

suggested that the Department 

acknowledge the lower risk profile of 

Tier 3 and Tier 4 covered chemical 

facilities and not require them to 

comply with 6 CFR 27.230(a)(12)(iv). 

The commenter requested that Tier 3 

and Tier 4 covered chemical facilities 

still be allowed to voluntarily 

participate. 

Response: The Department believes 

that 6 CFR 27.230(a)(12)(iv) mitigates 

the risk of an individual with terrorist 

ties having insider access. Terrorist 

insiders could cause significant harm to 

the United States through access to any 

tiered chemical facility. To achieve the 

anti-terrorism objective of CFATS, it is 

necessary to mitigate this risk by 

conducting terrorist ties checks at all 

covered facilities. RBPS 12 accordingly 

requires terrorist ties checks for 

facilities of all four tiers. 

Comment: One commenter questioned 

the effectiveness of the CFATS PSP if 

‘‘absent a clear national security, 

homeland security, or law enforcement 

rationale . . . DHS does not follow-up 

with the company to alert it of the 

possible threat.’’ The commenter further 

stated that the ‘‘value of conducting 

TSDB screening is questionable if an 

identified bad actor is permitted 

continued access to [chemicals of 

interest] unbeknownst to the facility, 

which is in the best position to ensure 

that the person is not afforded that 

opportunity.’’ 

Response: The Department’s design of 

the CFATS Program is intended to 

promote and enhance the security of 

high-risk chemical facilities; the PSP is 

one element of the larger CFATS 

Program. To prevent a significant threat 

to a facility or loss of life, a high-risk 

chemical facility will be contacted 

where appropriate and in accordance 

with federal law and policy, and per law 

enforcement and intelligence 

requirements. 

The Department’s Methodology in 

Estimating the Burden for the CFATS 

PSP 

This 30-day notice relies on the 

analysis and resulting burden estimates 

in the 60-day notice for this instrument. 

Analysis 

Title: Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism 

Standards (CFATS) Personnel Surety 

Program. 

OMB Number: 1670–0029. 

Instrument: CFATS Personnel Surety 

Program. 

Frequency: ‘‘Other.’’ 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit. 

Number of Annual Respondents: 72,607 

respondents (estimate). 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.1667 

hours (10 minutes). 

Total Annual Burden Hours: 12,101 

hours. 

Total Annual Burden Cost (capital/ 

startup): $1,719,409. 

Total Annual Burden Cost: $955,191. 

Total Recordkeeping Burden: $0. 

David Epperson, 

Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2018–12523 Filed 6–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–9P–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Fish and Wildlife Service 

[FWS–R8–ES–2018–N009; 

FXES11130800000–189–FF08E00000] 

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 

and Plants; Initiation of 5-Year Status 

Reviews of 50 Species in California, 

Nevada, and the Klamath Basin of 

Oregon 

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of initiation of reviews; 

request for information. 

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service (Service), are initiating 

5-year status reviews of 50 species in 

California, Nevada, and the Klamath 

Basin of Oregon under the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). 

A 5-year review is based on the best 

scientific and commercial data available 

at the time of the review; therefore, we 

are requesting submission of any new 

information on these species that has 

become available since the last review. 

DATES: To ensure consideration in our 

reviews, we are requesting submission 

of new information no later than August 

17, 2018. However, we will continue to 

accept new information about any 

species at any time. 

ADDRESSES: For how and where to send 

information, see Request for New 

Information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

whom to contact for species-specific 

information, see Request for New 

Information. Individuals who are 

hearing impaired or speech impaired 

may call the Federal Relay Service at 

800–877–8337 for TTY assistance. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Why do we conduct 5-year reviews? 

Under the Endangered Species Act of 

1973, as amended (Act; 16 U.S.C. 1531 

et seq.), we maintain lists of endangered 

and threatened wildlife and plant 

species (referred to as the List) in the 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 50 

CFR 17.11 (for wildlife) and 17.12 (for 

plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act 

requires us to review each listed 

species’ status at least once every 5 

years. For additional information about 

5-year reviews, refer to our factsheet at 

http://www.fws.gov/endangered/whatwe-do/recovery-overview.html. 

What information do we consider in 

our review? 

A 5-year review considers all new 

information available at the time of the 

review. In conducting these reviews, we 

consider the best scientific and 

commercial data that have become 

available since the listing determination 

or most recent status review, such as: 

(A) Species biology, including but not 

limited to population trends, 

distribution, abundance, demographics, 

and genetics; 

(B) Habitat conditions, including but 

not limited to amount, distribution, and 

suitability; 

(C) Conservation measures that have 

been implemented to benefit the 

species; 

(D) Threat status and trends in 

relation to the five listing factors (as 

defined in section 4(a)(1) of the Act); 

and 

(E) Other new information, data, or 

corrections, including but not limited to 

taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, 

identification of erroneous information 

contained in the List, and improved 

analytical methods. 

Any new information will be 

considered during the 5-year review and 

will also be useful in evaluating the 

ongoing recovery programs for the 

species. 

Which species are under review? 

This notice announces our active 

review of the species listed in the table 

below. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
28252 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Notices 

Common name Scientific name Status States where the species is known to occur 

Final Listing rule 

(Federal Register citation and 

publication date) 

Lead Fish and 

Wildlife Office 

Animals 

Butterfly, Lange’s 

metalmark.

Apodemia mormo 

langei.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 41 FR 22041 22044; 

6/1/1976.

San Francisco BayDelta Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Butterfly, Smith’s blue Euphilotes enoptes 

smithi.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 41 FR 22041 22044; 

6/1/1976.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Cuckoo, yellow-billed Coccyzus americanus Threatened ............... Western U.S. distinct population segment 

(DPS): Arizona, California, Colorado, 

Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, 

Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wyoming, as well as Canada and Mexico.

79 FR 59991 60038; 

10/03/2014.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Frog, California redlegged.Rana draytonii ........... Threatened ............... California ...................................................... 61 FR 25813 25833; 

5/23/1996.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Frog, mountain yellow-legged.Rana muscosa .......... Endangered .............. Southern California DPS: California ............. 67 FR 44382 44392; 

7/2/2002.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Goby, tidewater ......... Eucyclogobius 

newberryi.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 59 FR 5494 5499; 2/ 

4/1994.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Kangaroo rat, Stephens’.Dipodomys stephensi 

(incl. D. cascus).

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 53 FR 38465 38469; 

9/30/1988.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Mountain beaver, 

Point Arena.

Aplodontia rufa nigra Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 56 FR 64716 64723; 

12/12/1991.

Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. 

Mouse, Pacific pocket Perognathus 

longimembris 

pacificus.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 59 FR 49752 49764; 

9/29/1994.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Plover, western 

snowy.

Charadrius 

alexandrinus 

nivosus.

Threatened ............... Pacific Coast population DPS: California, 

Oregon, Washington, Mexico (within 50 

miles of Pacific coast).

58 FR 12864 12874; 

3/5/1993.

Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. 

Poolfish, Pahrump ..... Empetrichthys latos .. Endangered .............. Nevada ......................................................... 32 FR 4001; 3/11/ 

1967.

Southern Nevada 

Fish and Wildlife 

Office. 

Rail, California clapper.Rallus longirostris 

obsoletus.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 35 FR 16047 16048; 

10/13/1970.

San Francisco BayDelta Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Sheep, Sierra Nevada 

bighorn.

Ovis canadensis 

sierrae.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 64 FR 19300 19309; 

4/20/1999.

Reno Fish and Wildlife Office. 

Skipper, Laguna 

Mountains.

Pyrgus ruralis 

lagunae.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 62 FR 2313 2322; 1/ 

16/1997.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Snail, Morro 

shoulderband 

(=Banded dune).

Helminthoglypta 

walkeriana.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 59 FR 64613 64623; 

12/15/1994.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Sucker, Lost River .... Deltistes luxatus ........ Endangered .............. California, Oregon ........................................ 53 FR 27130 27134; 

7/18/1988.

Klamath Falls Fish 

and Wildlife Office. 

Sucker, shortnose ..... Chasmistes 

brevirostris.

Endangered .............. California, Oregon ........................................ 53 FR 27130 27134; 

7/18/1988.

Klamath Falls Fish 

and Wildlife Office. 

Tern, California least Sterna antillarum 

browni.

Endangered .............. Arizona, California ........................................ 35 FR 8491 8498; 6/ 

2/1970.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Towhee, Inyo California.Pipilo crissalis 

eremophilus.

Threatened ............... California ...................................................... 52 FR 28780 28786; 

8/3/1987.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Plants 

Bedstraw, El Dorado Galium californicum 

ssp. sierrae.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 61 FR 54346 54358; 

10/18/1996.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Bedstraw, island ........ Galium buxifolium ..... Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 62 FR 40954 40974; 

7/31/1997.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Bird’s-beak, Pennell’s Cordylanthus tenuis 

ssp. capillaris.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 60 FR 6671 6685; 2/ 

3/1995.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Bluegrass, San 

Bernardino.

Poa atropurpurea ...... Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 63 FR 49006 49022; 

9/14/1998.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Butterweed, Layne’s Senecio layneae ....... Threatened ............... California ...................................................... 61 FR 54346 54358; 

10/18/1996.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Ceanothus, Pine Hill Ceanothus roderickii Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 61 FR 54346 54358; 

10/18/1996.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Checker-mallow, 

Kenwood Marsh.

Sidalcea oregana 

ssp. valida.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 62 FR 54791 54808; 

10/22/1997.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Clarkia, Vine Hill ....... Clarkia imbricata ....... Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 62 FR 54791 54808; 

10/22/1997.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Crownbeard, bigleaved.Verbesina dissita ...... Threatened ............... California, Mexico ......................................... 61 FR 52370 52384; 

10/7/1996.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Evening-primrose, 

San Benito.

Camissonia 

benitensis.

Threatened ............... California ...................................................... 50 FR 5755 5759; 2/ 

12/1985.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Flannelbush, Pine Hill Fremontodendron 

californicum ssp. 

decumbens.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 61 FR 54346 54358; 

10/18/1996.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Goldfields, Burke’s .... Lasthenia burkei ....... Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 56 FR 61173 61182; 

12/2/1991.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Larkspur, Baker’s ...... Delphinium bakeri ..... Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 65 FR 4156 4162; 1/ 

26/2000.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Larkspur, yellow ........ Delphinium luteum .... Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 65 FR 4156 4162; 1/ 

26/2000.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Notices 28253 

Common name Scientific name Status States where the species is known to occur 

Final Listing rule 

(Federal Register citation and 

publication date) 

Lead Fish and 

Wildlife Office 

Lily, Pitkin Marsh ....... Lilium pardalinum 

ssp. pitkinense.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 62 FR 54791 54808; 

10/22/1997.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Lily, Western ............. Lilium occidentale ..... Endangered .............. California, Oregon ........................................ 59 FR 42171 42176; 

8/17/1994.

Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. 

Lupine, Nipomo Mesa Lupinus nipomensis .. Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 65 FR 14888 14898; 

3/20/2000.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Meadowfoam, 

Sebastopol.

Limnanthes vinculans Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 56 FR 61173 61182; 

12/2/1991.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Milk-vetch, Applegate’s.Astragalus applegatei Endangered .............. California, Oregon ........................................ 58 FR 40547 40551; 

7/28/1993.

Klamath Falls Fish 

and Wildlife Office. 

Milk-vetch, Clara 

Hunt’s.

Astragalus clarianus Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 62 FR 54791 54808; 

10/22/1997.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Milk-vetch, Peirson’s. Astragalus 

magdalenae var. 

peirsonii.

Threatened ............... California ...................................................... 63 FR 53596 53615; 

10/6/1998.

Carlsbad Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Morning-glory, 

Stebbins’.

Calystegia stebbinsii Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 61 FR 54346 54358; 

10/18/1996.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Mountainbalm, Indian 

Knob.

Eriodictyon 

altissimum.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 59 FR 64613 64623; 

12/15/1994.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Penny-cress, 

Kneeland Prairie.

Thlaspi californicum .. Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 65 FR 6332 6338; 2/ 

9/2000.

Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. 

Phlox, Yreka .............. Phlox hirsuta ............. Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 65 FR 5268 5275; 2/ 

3/2000.

Yreka Fish and Wildlife Office. 

Rush-rose, island ...... Helianthemum 

greenei.

Threatened ............... California ...................................................... 62 FR 40954 40974; 

7/31/1997.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Sedge, white ............. Carex albida .............. Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 62 FR 54791 54808; 

10/22/1997.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Spineflower, Howell’s Chorizanthe howellii .. Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 57 FR 27848 27859; 

6/22/1992.

Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office. 

Spineflower, Scotts 

Valley.

Chorizanthe robusta 

var. hartwegii.

Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 59 FR 5499 5510; 2/ 

4/1994.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Sunshine, Sonoma .... Blennosperma bakeri Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 56 FR 61173 61182; 

12/2/1991.

Sacramento Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

Thistle, La Graciosa .. Cirsium loncholepis ... Endangered .............. California ...................................................... 65 FR 14888 14898; 

3/20/2000.

Ventura Fish and 

Wildlife Office. 

What is a Distinct Population Segment? 

Yellow-billed cuckoo, mountain 

yellow-legged frog, and western snowy 

plover were each listed as a Distinct 

Population Segment (DPS) of a 

vertebrate taxon. A DPS is defined in 

the February 7, 1996, Policy Regarding 

the Recognition of Distinct Vertebrate 

Population Segments (61 FR 4722). For 

a population to be listed under the Act 

as a distinct vertebrate population 

segment, three elements are considered: 

(1) The discreteness of the population 

segment in relation to the remainder of 

the species to which it belongs; (2) the 

significance of the population segment 

to the species to which it belongs; and 

(3) the population segment’s 

conservation status in relation to the 

Act’s standards for listing (i.e., is the 

population segment endangered or 

threatened?). Distinct population 

segments of vertebrate species, as well 

as subspecies of all listed species, may 

be proposed for separate reclassification 

or for removal from the list. We will 

apply the DPS policy during the 5-year 

review. 

Request for New Information 

To ensure that a 5-year review is 

complete and based on the best 

available scientific and commercial 

information, we request new 

information from all sources. See What 

Information Do We Consider in Our 

Review? for specific criteria. If you 

submit information, please support it 

with documentation such as maps, 

bibliographic references, methods used 

to gather and analyze the data, and/or 

copies of any pertinent publications, 

reports, or letters by knowledgeable 

sources. 

To get more information on a species, 

submit information on a species; or 

review information we receive, please 

use the following contact information, 

depending on the Lead Fish and 

Wildlife Office for the species specified 

in the table above. 

Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office: 

Kathleen Brubaker, 707–822–7201 

(phone); Kathleen_brubaker@fws.gov 

(email); or 1655 Heindon Road, Arcata, 

CA 952121 (U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or 

in-person review of documents); 

Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office: 

Bradd Baskerville-Bridges, 760–431– 

9440 (phone); fw8cfwocomments@

fws.gov (email); or 2177 Salk Avenue, 

Suite 250, Carlsbad, CA 92008 (U.S. 

mail, hand-delivery, or in-person review 

of documents); 

Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife 

Office: Daniel Blake, 541–885–2512 

(phone); daniel_blake@fws.gov (email); 

or 1936 California Ave., Klamath Falls, 

OR 97601 (U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or 

in-person review of documents); 

Reno Fish and Wildlife Office: Erin 

Nordin, 760–872–5020 (phone); erin_

nordin@fws.gov (email); or 351 Pacu 

Lane, Bishop, California 93514 (U.S. 

mail, hand-delivery, or in-person review 

of documents); 

Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office: 

Josh Hull, 916–414–6742 (phone); josh_

hull@fws.gov (email); or 2800 Cottage 

Way, Suite W2605, Sacramento, 

California 95825 (U.S. mail, handdelivery, or in-person review of 

documents); 

San Francisco Bay-Delta Fish and 

Wildlife Office: Steven Detwiler, 916– 

930–2640 (phone); steven_detwiler@

fws.gov (email); or 650 Capitol Mall, 

Sacramento, CA 95814 (U.S. mail, handdelivery, or in-person review of 

documents); 

Southern Nevada Fish and Wildlife 

Office: James Harter, 702–515–5230 

(phone); james_harter@fws.gov (email; 

or 4701 N. Torrey Pines Dr., Las Vegas, 

NV 89130 (U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or 

in-person review of documents); 

Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office: Cat 

Darst, 805–677–3318 (phone); cat_

darst@fws.gov (email); or 2493 Portola 

Road, Suite B, Ventura CA 93003 (U.S. 

mail, hand-delivery, or in-person review 

of documents); 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1
28254 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 117 / Monday, June 18, 2018 / Notices 

Yreka Fish and Wildlife Office: 

Nadine Kanim, 530–841–3108 (phone); 

nadine_kanim@fws.gov (email); or 1829 

S Oregon Street, Yreka, California 96097 

(U.S. mail, hand-delivery, or in-person 

review of documents). 

Public Availability of Comments 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Comments and materials received will 

be available for public inspection, by 

appointment, during normal business 

hours at the offices to which the 

comments are submitted. 

Authority 

This document is published under the 

authority of the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 

seq.). 

Jody Holzworth, 

Acting Regional Director, Pacific Southwest 

Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018–12974 Filed 6–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4333–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–NPS0025528; 

PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] 

Notice of Inventory Completion: Heard 

Museum, Phoenix, AZ 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Heard Museum has 

completed an inventory of human 

remains, in consultation with the 

appropriate Indian Tribes or Native 

Hawaiian organizations, and has 

determined that there is a cultural 

affiliation between the human remains 

and present-day Indian Tribes or Native 

Hawaiian organizations. Lineal 

descendants or representatives of any 

Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization not identified in this notice 

that wish to request transfer of control 

of these human remains should submit 

a written request to the Heard Museum. 

If no additional requestors come 

forward, transfer of control of the 

human remains to the lineal 

descendants, Indian Tribes, or Native 

Hawaiian organizations stated in this 

notice may proceed. 

DATES: Lineal descendants or 

representatives of any Indian Tribe or 

Native Hawaiian organization not 

identified in this notice that wish to 

request transfer of control of these 

human remains should submit a written 

request with information in support of 

the request to the Heard Museum at the 

address in this notice by July 18, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: David Roche, Director/CEO, 

Heard Museum, 2301 North Central 

Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85004, telephone 

(602) 252–8840, email director@

heard.org. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

here given in accordance with the 

Native American Graves Protection and 

Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 

3003, of the completion of an inventory 

of human remains under the control of 

the Heard Museum, Phoenix, AZ. The 

human remains were removed from 

Navajo County, AZ. 

This notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in 

this notice are the sole responsibility of 

the museum, institution, or Federal 

agency that has control of the Native 

American human remains. The National 

Park Service is not responsible for the 

determinations in this notice. 

Consultation 

A detailed assessment of the human 

remains was made by the Heard 

Museum professional staff in 

consultation with representatives of the 

Hopi Tribe of Arizona and Zuni Tribe of 

the Zuni Reservation, New Mexico. 

History and Description of the Remains 

Sometime prior to 1991, human 

remains representing, at minimum, one 

individual were removed from Navajo 

County, AZ. In 1991, the human 

remains were found in museum storage 

and assigned catalog number NA–SW– 

PR–T–5. The individual was an adult 

aged 18–20 years, of unknown gender. 

No known individuals were identified. 

No associated funerary objects were 

present. A note with the remains 

identified it as ‘‘Pueblo.’’ 

Determinations Made by the Heard 

Museum 

Officials of the Heard Museum have 

determined that: 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the 

human remains described in this notice 

represent the physical remains of one 

individuals of Native American 

ancestry. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there 

is a relationship of shared group 

identity that can be reasonably traced 

between the Native American human 

remains and Hopi Tribe of Arizona and 

Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New 

Mexico. 

Additional Requestors and Disposition 

Lineal descendants or representatives 

of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization not identified in this notice 

that wish to request transfer of control 

of these human remains should submit 

a written request with information in 

support of the request to David Roche, 

Director/CEO, Heard Museum, 2301 

North Central Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 

85004, telephone (602) 252–8840, email 

director@heard.org, by July 18, 2018. 

After that date, if no additional 

requestors have come forward, transfer 

of control of the human remains to the 

Hopi Tribe of Arizona; Pueblo of 

Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo of Laguna, 

New Mexico; and Zuni Tribe of the Zuni 

Reservation, New Mexico may proceed. 

The Heard Museum is responsible for 

notifying the Hopi Tribe of Arizona and 

Zuni Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New 

Mexico that this notice has been 

published. 

Dated: May 2, 2018. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2018–13034 Filed 6–15–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–NPS0025638; 

PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000] 

Notice of Inventory Completion: La 

Plata County Historical Society, 

Durango, CO; Correction 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: The La Plata County 

Historical Society has corrected a Notice 

of Inventory Completion published in 

the Federal Register on April 4, 2018. 

This notice corrects a paragraph that 

contains an error. 

ADDRESSES: Kathy McKenzie, Board 

President, La Plata County Historical 

Society, 3065 W 2nd Avenue, Durango, 

CO 81301, telephone (970) 259–2402, 

email director@animasmuseum.org. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice is published as part of the 

National Park Service’s administrative 

responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 

U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in 

this notice are the sole responsibility of 

the museum, institution, or Federal 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1