alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 10, 2008 |  | /s/DAVID J. ANDERSONDavid J. Anderson President and Chief Executive
Officer
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.194

                                   DEMAND NOTE

$300,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                                   March 2, 2001

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Three
Hundred Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($300,000.00), together with interest on
the unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time
from the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                                  Wilshire Technologies, Inc.



                                                  By: /s/ KATHLEEN E. TERRY
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Kathleen E. Terry
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1773

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Carlos F. Thompson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 1, 2010 Filed: October 20, 2010

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. A jury found Carlos Thompson guilty of knowingly possessing a firearm after having been convicted of a felony, inviolation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The district court 1 sentenced him within the cal culated advisory Guidelines range to 51 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release, and ordered him to pay a fine of $3,000. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the court’s denial of two

1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas.motions for appointment of new counsel, the sufficiency of the evidence to support Thompson’s conviction, and the reasonableness of the sentence.
To begin, we conclude th at the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Thompson’s motions for new counsel. See United States v. Anderson , 570 F.3d 1025, 1031 (8th Cir. 2009) (review sta ndard; describing circumstances where defendant may be entitled to new counsel). We further conclude that there was sufficient evidence to support Thompson’s conviction. See United States v. Myers , 575 F.3d 801, 808 (8th Cir. 2009) (this court reviews sufficiency of evidence viewing evidence in light most favorable to jury’s ve rdict; verdict will be uphe ld if there is any interpretation of evidence that could leadreasonable jury to find defendant guilty beyond reasonable doubt); United States v. Bradley , 473 F.3d 866, 867 (8th Cir. 2007) (setting forth elements of § 922(g)(1) offense; government can prove defendant knowingly possessed firearm by showing he had actual or constructive possession of it). We also conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461, 464 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (standards for reviewing senten ce); United States v. Saddler , 538 F.3d 879, 890 (8th Cir. 2008) (describing circum stances where district court abuses its discretion and imposes unreasonable sentence).
Finally, having reviewed the recordindependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issu e for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.7


             Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-01574, 333-12789 and 333-24581); Form S-3 (Nos. 
333-10383 and 333-14025); Form S-4 (No. 333-13133); and Post Effective 
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 on Form S-8 (No. 333-36463) of our report dated 
February 2, 1996, with respect to the financial statements of School 
Specialty, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1995 (not presented 
separately herein), which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K 
of U.S. Office Products Company.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
---------------------

Milwaukee, Wisconsin                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP
July 20, 1998
---

CONSENT OF AUTHOR

****

ROSS GLANVILLE 7513 Pandora Drive Burnaby, BC



US Securities and Exchange Commission



I, Ross Glanville, P.Eng., certify that I have read the written
disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are
any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or
that the written disclosure in the Form 40F of Great Basin Gold Ltd. contains
any misrepresentation of the information contained in Technical Report
Burnstone Gold Project Pre-feasibility Study Area 1  Executive Summary dated
November 2004.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory
authorities.



Dated this 31st day of March, 2006



/s/ Ross Glanville

|Ross Glanville,
      P.Eng.
|----------------------------

---
#### CITY OF MIAMI, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, Appellant, v. FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY COMPANY, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 73-367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 27, 1973.

*254John S. Lloyd, City Atty., and R. Harris Turner, Asst. City Atty., Howard Hadley, Winter Park, Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, for appellant.

Shutts & Bowen and Eric B. Meyers, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the Florida East Coast Railway as counterclaimant. The issue presented by the counterclaim was the railroad’s right to improve its property during the progress of an eminent domain suit brought by the City of Miami. Error is also assigned upon an order denying petitioner’s motion to dismiss defendant’s counterclaim, and upon an order denying petitioner’s motion to stay hearing on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have examined the points presented in petitioner’s argument upon the order denying its motion to dismiss, and we find that no error has been committed. As to the order denying petitioner’s motion to stay hearing, we hold that this order is within the bounds of discretion allowed to the trial judge in such matters. See Willey v. W. J. Hoggson Corporation, 89 Fla. 446, 105 So. 126 (1925).

The summary judgment appealed was granted by the trial court upon a holding that the City, having passed a resolution authorizing the issuance of a permit under certain conditions, was estopped to create new conditions after those created by the first resolution had been met. We think that this proposition is fully supported in the law. See Texas Co. v. Town of Miami Springs, Fla.1950, 44 So.2d 808; City of Hialeah v. Allmand, Fla.App.1968, 207 So.2d 9; City of Gainesville v. Bishop, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 100.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Claude J. BREAUX.

No. 60379.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for rehearing.

*875Rehearing denied. As we construe the record, the trial judge revoked bail solely because relator had qualified as an indigent.
#### Eliecer Genard GONZALEZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43179.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 268 So.2d 552.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.4

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                             DOBSON FINANCING TRUST


            1. The name of the business trust is:

                        DOBSON FINANCING TRUST

            2. The  name  and  business  address  of the  trustee  having  its
principal place of business in the State of Delaware are:

               The Bank of New York (Delaware)
               White Clay Center
               Route 273
               Newark, Delaware  19711

            3. This Certificate shall be effective upon the filing hereof.

            Executed this 9th day of July, 2001.

                                       THE  BANK  OF  NEW  YORK,  a  New  York
                                       banking corporation

                                          /s/ Ming J. Shiang
                                       By:____________________________________
                                              Ming J. Shiang
                                              Vice President


                                       THE  BANK  OF NEW  YORK  (DELAWARE),  a
                                       Delaware banking corporation


                                          /s/ Michael Santino
                                       By:____________________________________
                                              Michael Santino
                                              Senior Vice President


                                       /s/ Everett R. Dobson
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Everett R. Dobson


                                       /s/ Richard D. Sewell, Jr.
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Richard D. Sewell, Jr.


                                       /s/ Ronald L. Ripley
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Ronald L. Ripley
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7678 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7678

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 to 
direct the Secretary of Defense to include a description of programs to 
 address and reduce the stigma associated with seeking assistance for 
            mental health or suicidal thoughts in a report.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2020

Mr. Brindisi (for himself and Mr. Katko) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 to 
direct the Secretary of Defense to include a description of programs to 
 address and reduce the stigma associated with seeking assistance for 
            mental health or suicidal thoughts in a report.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Mental Health Stigma 
Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORTS ON SUICIDE PREVENTION PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES OF THE 
              DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    Section 741(a)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116-92; 133 Stat. 1467) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(J) A description of the programs carried out by 
                the military departments to address and reduce the 
                stigma associated with seeking assistance for mental 
                health or suicidal thoughts.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

FTC DOCKET NO. D09419

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:D. MICHAEL CHAPPELL

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

IN THE MATTER OF: 

LORENZO RUIZ

REQUEST BY PARTY TO WITHDRAW

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

Appellant, Lorenzo Ruiz, who filed an Application for Review in FTC Docket No. D09419

requests the that the Federal Trade Commission withdraw his Application for Review.

Appellant does not wish to continue with this matter at this time and accepts the offer of 

the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority to accept the withdrawal of his prior admission and 

re-initiate the Arbitration Procedures before the ADMC Program’s Arbitral Body.

DATED: October 25, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

Darrell J. Vienna (CA SBN 173694)

5256 S. Mission Rd., Ste. 703-808 

Bonsall, CA 92003

Telephone 626.590.9999

Facsimile 626.470-9973

/s/ Darrell J. Vienna

Darrell J. Vienna

horselawyer@gmail.com

Carlo Fisco (CA SBN 166274)

P.O. Box 2554

Culver City, CA 90231-2554 

Telephone 310.390.3311

/s/ Carlo Fisco

Carlo Fisco

cfisco@aol.com

PUBLIC

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/26/2023 OSCAR NO. 608832 -PAGE Page 1 of 2 * PUBLIC * 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to 16 CFR 1.146(a) and 16 CFR 4.4(b), a copy of the forgoing is being served this

25th day of October 2023 via First Class mail and electronic mail upon the following:

April Tabor

Office of the Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington. DC 20580

Via e-mail to: electronicfilings@ftc.gov

Hon. D. Michael Chappell Chief 

Administrative Law Judge

Office of Administrative Law Judges 

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20580

Via e-mail to: oalj@ftc.gov

Bryan Beauman

Rebecca Price

HISA Enforcement Counsel

333 W. Vine Street, Suite 1500

Lexington, KY 40507

Via e-mail to: bbeauman@sturgillturner.com

Via e-mail to: rprice@sturgillturner.com

PUBLIC

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/26/2023 OSCAR NO. 608832 -PAGE Page 2 of 2 * PUBLIC *
Exhibit 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


         I, Robert S. Hekemian, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
     ended July 31, 2002 of First Real Estate Investment Trust of New Jersey;

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present  in all
     material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash
     flows of the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
     quarterly report.


Date:  September 13, 2002


BY:  /s/ Robert S. Hekemian
     ----------------------
     Chairman and Chief  Financial / Accounting Officer



<PAGE>
263 La. 798

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. William BROOKS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52996.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 5, 1972.

In re: William Brooks applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, prohibition, mandamus.

Application denied; the showing made does not justify the exercise of our jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion that an evidentiary hearing is required to inquire into the constitutionality of the line up identification.

TATE, J.,

concurs in Barham, J.’s opinion. Aside from the lack of counsel, petitioner alleges other facts which, if true, may have led to an irreparably suggestive pre-indictment identification.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            By:   /s/ James T. Barry
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  James T. Barry
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  June 13, 2008
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 February 20, 2008

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



<PAGE>

Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Registrant has reported its results of operations for the Fiscal Year
ended December 31, 2007, as described in Registrant's press release dated
February 15, 2008, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.

Exhibit No.   Document
-----------   --------

99.1          Press release issued by the Registrant dated February 15, 2008.



                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: February 20, 2008                           By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary