1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5 Filed 05/25/22 Page 1 of 6 

BRIAN M. BOYNTON, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

ARUN G. RAO, Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

GUSTAV W. EYLER, Director 

LISA K. HSIAO, Assistant Director 

ZACHARY L. COWAN, Trial Attorney (NCBN 53432) 

DEBORAH S. SOHN, Trial Attorney (NYBN 5118096, DCBN 1025098) 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Civil Division 

Consumer Protection Branch 

450 5th Street NW, Suite 6400-S 

Washington, DC 20530 

Telephone: (202) 451-7468 

Zachary.L.Cowan@usdoj.gov 

Deborah.S.Sohn@usdoj.gov 

STEPHANIE M. HINDS, United States Attorney (CABN 154284) 

MICHELLE LO, Chief, Civil Division (NYBN 4325163) 

SHARANYA MOHAN, Assistant United States Attorney (NYBN 5027768) 

EMMET P. ONG, Assistant United States Attorney (NYBN 4581369) 

Northern District of California 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, California 94102 

Telephone: (415) 436-7198 

sharanya.mohan@usdoj.gov 

emmet.ong@usdoj.gov 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

[Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TWITTER, INC., a corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:22-cv-3070 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR CIVIL 

PENALTY, MONETARY JUDGMENT, 

AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED ORDER 

No. 3:22-cv-3070 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5 Filed 05/25/22 Page 2 of 6 

Plaintiff the United States of America, acting upon notification and authorization to the Attorney 

General by the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), filed its Complaint for Civil 

Penalties, Permanent Injunction, Monetary Relief, and Other Equitable Relief, against Defendant 

Twitter, Inc. for alleged violations of a 2011 FTC Administrative Order and Section 5 of the FTC Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 45. See ECF No. 1. The parties have resolved all issues in this matter through the attached 

proposed Stipulated Order for Civil Penalty, Monetary Judgment, and Injunctive Relief. Under the 

terms of the Stipulated Order, Twitter agrees to pay $150 million in civil penalties, reopen the 

underlying administrative proceedings in FTC Docket No. C-4316 pursuant to Section 3.72(b) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.72(b), and modify the Decision and Order in In re 

Twitter, Inc., C-4316, 151 FTC LEXIS 162 (F.T.C. Mar. 2, 2011) with the Decision and Order set forth 

in Attachment A to the Stipulated Order, and submit to substantial compliance reporting measures to 

ensure future compliance with the law. 

“Because of the unique aspects of settlements, a district court should enter a proposed consent 

judgment if the court decides that it is fair, reasonable and equitable and does not violate the law or 

public policy.” Sierra Club, Inc. v. Elec. Controls Design, Inc., 909 F.2d 1350, 1355 (9th Cir. 1990) 

(citing Citizens for a Better Environment v. Gorsuch, 718 F.2d 1117, 1125–26 (D.C. Cir. 1983)); see 

SEC v. Randolph, 736 F.2d 525, 529 (9th Cir. 1984). In approving a settlement, a court “need not 

inquire into the precise legal rights of the parties nor reach and resolve the merits of the claims or 

controversy.” Gorsuch, 718 F.2d at 1126 (quoting Metro. Hous. Dev. Corp. v. Vill. Of Arlington 

Heights, 616 F.2d 1006, 1014 (7th Cir. 1980)). Rather, “[a]s long as the consent decree comes within 

the general scope of the case made by the pleadings, furthers the objectives upon which the law is based, 

and does not violate the statute upon which the complaint was based, the parties’ agreement may be 

entered by the court.” Sierra Club, 909 F.2d at 1355 (quoting Loc. No. 93, Int’l Ass’n of 

Firefighters, AFL-CIO C.L.C. v. City of Cleveland, 478 U.S. 501, 525–26 (1986) (quoting Pacific R. Co. 

v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 297 (1880))) (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted). 

The Stipulated Order is fair, reasonable, and equitable. It addresses the concerns giving rise to 

the Complaint by modifying the administrative order to require Twitter to undertake multiple measures 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED ORDER 

No. 3:22-cv-3070 

2 
 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5 Filed 05/25/22 Page 3 of 6 

that will improve its protection of consumer data. These measures include prohibiting 

misrepresentations about the extent to which the company protects the privacy of its users’ nonpublic 

contact information, including any misrepresentations about its use of such information, and requiring 

Twitter to implement a comprehensive privacy and information security program with extensive 

procedures to safeguard user information and assess internal and external data privacy risks. To afford 

consumers these protections as soon as possible, the parties respectfully jointly request that the Court 

promptly effectuate this resolution and enter the proposed Stipulated Order. 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED ORDER 

No. 3:22-cv-3070 

3 
 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5 Filed 05/25/22 Page 4 of 6 

Dated: May 25, 2022 

Of Counsel: 

JAMES A. KOHM 

Associate Director 

Division of Enforcement 

LAURA KOSS 

Assistant Director 

Division of Enforcement 

REENAH L. KIM 

Attorney 

Division of Enforcement 

ANDREA V. ARIAS 

Attorney 

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 

Mail Stop CC-9528 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Tel: (202) 326-2272 (Kim) 

Tel: (202) 326-2715 (Arias) 

rkim1@ftcgov 

aarias@ftc.gov 

Respectfully submitted, 

FOR PLAINTIFF 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 

BRIAN M. BOYNTON 

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

Civil Division 

ARUN G. RAO 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

GUSTAV W. EYLER 

Director 

Consumer Protection Branch 

LISA K. HSIAO 

Assistant Director

 /s/ Zachary L. Cowan 

ZACHARY L. COWAN 

DEBORAH S. SOHN 

Trial Attorneys 

Consumer Protection Branch 

U.S. Department of Justice 

450 5th Street, N.W. Suite 6400-S 

Washington, D.C. 20530 

Tel: (202) 598-7566 

Fax: (202) 514-8742 

Zachary.L.Cowan@usdoj.gov 

Deborah.S.Sohn@usdoj.gov 

STEPHANIE M. HINDS 

United States Attorney 

MICHELLE LO 

Chief 

Civil Division 

SHARANYA MOHAN 

EMMET P. ONG 

Assistant United States Attorneys 

Northern District of California 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, California 94102 

Tel: (415) 436-7198 

sharanya.mohan@usdoj.gov 

emmet.ong@usdoj.gov 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED ORDER 

No. 3:22-cv-3070 

4 
 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5 Filed 05/25/22 Page 5 of 6 

FOR DEFENDANT TWITTER, INC.: 

LYDIA B. PARNES 

Wilson Sonsoni Goodrich & Rosati 

1700 K Street N.W., Fifth Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Tel: (202) 973-8800 

lparnes@wsgr.com 

/s/ Anthony J Weibell 

ANTHONY J WEIBELL (CABN 238850) 

Wilson Sonsoni Goodrich & Rosati 

650 Page Mill Road 

Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 

Tel: (650) 493-9300 

aweibell@wsgr.com 

Counsel for Twitter, Inc. 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED ORDER 

No. 3:22-cv-3070 

5 
 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5 Filed 05/25/22 Page 6 of 6 

FILER ATTESTATION 

I, Zachary L. Cowan, attest under Local Rule 5-1(h)(3) that all other signatories listed and on 

whose behalf the filing is submitted have concurred in the filing of this document.

 /s/ Zachary L. Cowan 

ZACHARY L. COWAN 

Trial Attorney 

Consumer Protection Branch 

U.S. Department of Justice 

450 5th Street, N.W. Suite 6400-S 

Washington, D.C. 20530 

Tel: (202) 598-7566 

Fax: (202) 514-8742 

Zachary.L.Cowan@usdoj.gov 

JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF STIPULATED ORDER 

No. 3:22-cv-3070 

6 
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 1 of 23 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TWITTER, INC., a corporation, 

Defendant. 

Case No. 3:22-cv-3070 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR 

CIVIL PENALTY, 

MONETARY JUDGMENT, AND 

INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR CIVIL PENALTY, MONETARY 

JUDGMENT, AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

The United States of America, acting upon notification and authorization to the Attorney 

General by the Federal Trade Commission (“Commission” or “FTC”), filed its Complaint for 

Civil Penalties, Permanent Injunction, and Other Equitable Relief (“Complaint”) in this matter 

pursuant to Sections 5(a) and (l), 13(b), and 16(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act 

(“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a) and (l), 53(b), and 56(a)(1). Defendant has waived service of 

the summons and the Complaint. Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the entry of this Stipulated 

Order for Civil Penalty, Monetary Judgment, and Injunctive Relief (“Stipulated Order”) to 

resolve the claims for civil penalties and injunctive relief set forth in the Complaint. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

FINDINGS 

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and all of the parties. 

2. Venue is proper as to all parties in this District. 

3. The Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted against Defendant under 

Sections 5(a) and (l), 13(b), and 16(a)(1) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 45(a), 45(l), 53(b), and 

1 
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 2 of 23 

56(a)(1), including for violations of Part I of the Commission’s Decision and Order in In re 

Twitter, Inc., C-4316, 151 FTC LEXIS 162 (F.T.C. Mar. 2, 2011). 

4. Defendant’s activities are “in or affecting commerce,” as defined in Section 4 of the FTC 

Act, 15 U.S.C. § 44. 

5. Defendant waives any claim that it may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action through the date of this Stipulated 

Order, and agrees to bear its own costs and attorney’s fees. 

6. Defendant neither admits nor denies any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as 

specifically stated in the Decision and Order set forth in Attachment A. Only for purposes of this 

action, Defendant admits the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction. 

7. Defendant and Plaintiff waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge or contest the 

validity of this Stipulated Order. 

I. MONETARY JUDGMENT FOR CIVIL PENALTY 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 

A. Judgment in the amount of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION dollars 

($150,000,000.00) is entered in favor of Plaintiff against Defendant as a civil penalty pursuant to 

Section 5(l) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45(l). 

B. Defendant is ordered to pay to Plaintiff, by making payment to the Treasurer of the 

United States, ONE HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION dollars ($150,000,000.00), which, as 

Defendant stipulates, its undersigned counsel holds in escrow for no purpose other than payment 

to Plaintiff. Such payment must be made within seven (7) days of entry of this Stipulated Order 

by electronic fund transfer in accordance with instructions specified by a representative of 

Plaintiff. 

C. In the event of any default in payment, the entire unpaid amount, together with interest, 

as computed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of default to the date of payment, shall 

immediately become due and payable. 

2 
 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 3 of 23 

D. Defendant relinquishes dominion and all legal and equitable right, title, and interest to all 

funds paid pursuant to this Stipulated Order. Defendant shall make no claim to or demand for 

return of the funds, directly or indirectly, through counsel or otherwise. 

E. Defendant agrees that the facts alleged in the Complaint will be taken as true, without 

further proof, only in any subsequent civil litigation by Plaintiff to enforce its rights to any 

payment or monetary judgment pursuant to this Stipulated Order. 

F. Defendant acknowledges that its Taxpayer Identification Numbers (Social Security 

Numbers or Employer Identification Numbers), which Defendant has previously submitted to 

Plaintiff, may be used for collecting and reporting on any delinquent amount arising out of this 

Stipulated Order, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 7701. 

II. MODIFICATION OF DECISION AND ORDER 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant, and its successors and assigns, shall 

consent to: (i) reopening of the proceeding in FTC Docket No. C-4316; (ii) waiver of its rights 

under the show cause procedures set forth in Section 3.72(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.72(b); and (iii) modifying the Decision and Order in In re Twitter, Inc., 

C-4316, 151 FTC LEXIS 162 (F.T.C. Mar. 2, 2011), with the Decision and Order set forth in 

Attachment A. 

III. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall provide to the Department of Justice 

copies of all of the reports, assessments, notifications, certifications, and other documents 

required or requested under the Decision and Order set forth in Attachment A as follows: Parts 

VI.A, VI.E, VIII.A, IX, X.A, XI.A, and XI.B. Such documents shall be furnished via email to 

Consumer.Compliance@usdoj.gov, with the subject line “United States v. Twitter, Inc., DJ 102-

4022.” In the event that electronic mail is unavailable, the documents may be sent to the Director 

of the Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch, and whomever he or she designates, 

via overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to: Director, Consumer Protection Branch, 

Department of Justice, 450 Fifth St. NW Ste. 6400-South, Washington, DC 20001, with the 

3 
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 4 of 23 

subject line “United States v. Twitter, Inc., DJ 102-4022.” Defendant agrees that the Department 

of Justice shall have the same rights as the Commission (as given in the Decision and Order set 

forth in Attachment A) to request such documents under the specified parts, subject to any 

applicable law or regulation. Within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a written request from a 

representative of the Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch related to the reports, 

assessments, notifications, certifications, and other documents produced pursuant to the parts of 

the Decision and Order identified in this paragraph, Defendant agrees to submit additional 

compliance reports or other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of 

perjury. For purposes of this paragraph, “Defendant” shall have the same definition and scope as 

the definition of “Respondent” in Paragraph E on page 3 of the Decision and Order set forth in 

Attachment A. 

IV. CONTINUING JURISDICTION 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction in this matter for 

purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Stipulated Order. 

SO ORDERED this ____ day of ________, 2022. 

______ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Dated: _______, 2022 

4 
 

 1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

 10 

 11 

 12 

 13 

 14 

 15 

 16 

 17 

 18 

 19 

 20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 5 of 23 

SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

Dated: May 25, 2022 FOR PLAINTIFF: 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 

BRIAN M. BOYNTON 

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

Civil Division 

ARUN G. RAO 

Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

GUSTAV W. EYLER 

Director 

Consumer Protection Branch 

LISA K. HSIAO 

Assistant Director

 /s/ Zachary L. Cowan

ZACHARY L. COWAN 

DEBORAH S. SOHN 

Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Civil Division 

Consumer Protection Branch 

450 5th Street NW, Suite 6400-S 

Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 451-7468

Zachary.L.Cowan@usdoj.gov

Deborah.S.Sohn@usdoj.gov 

STEPHANIE M. HINDS 

United States Attorney 

MICHELLE LO 

Chief, Civil Division 

SHARANYA MOHAN 

EMMET P. ONG 

Assistant United States Attorneys

Northern District of California 

450 Golden Gate Avenue 

San Francisco, California 94102

Tel: (415) 436-7198

sharanya.mohan@usdoj.gov 

emmet.ong@usdoj.gov 

5 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 6 of 23 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 7 of 23 
 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 8 of 23 

ATTACHMENT A 

202-3062 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair 

 Noah Joshua Phillips

 Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

 Christine S. Wilson 

In the Matter of DECISION AND ORDER 

TWITTER, INC., a corporation. Docket No. C-4316 

DECISION 

The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) initiated an investigation of certain acts 

and practices of the Respondent named in the caption. The Commission’s Bureau of Consumer 

Protection (“BCP”) prepared and furnished to Respondent a draft Complaint. BCP proposed 

presenting the draft Complaint to the Commission. If issued, the draft Complaint would charge 

Respondent with violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. 

§§ 45(a)(1) and (l), 53(b), and 56(a)(1). 

Respondent neither admits nor denies any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as 

specifically stated in the Decision and Order. Only for purposes of this action, Respondent 

admits the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction. 

The Commission considered the matter and determined that it had reason to believe 

Respondent has violated the Decision and Order the Commission previously issued in In re 

Twitter, Inc., C-4316, 151 FTC LEXIS 162 (F.T.C. March 2, 2011) and the FTC Act, and that a 

Complaint should issue stating its charges in that respect. After due consideration, the 

Commission issues the Complaint, makes the following Findings, and issues the following 

Order: 

FINDINGS 

1. Respondent Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal office or 

place of business at 1355 Market Street, Suite 900, San Francisco, CA 94103. 

2. The Commission has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and over the 

Respondent, and the proceeding is in the public interest. 

1 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 9 of 23 

3. The Complaint charges violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and 

violations of Provision I of an order previously issued by the Commission, 15 U.S.C. § 56(a)(1). 

4. Respondent waives any claim that it may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 

U.S.C. § 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action through the date of this Order, and 

agrees to bear its own costs and attorney fees. 

5. Respondent and the Commission waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge or 

contest the validity of this Order. 

ORDER 

DEFINITIONS 

For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions apply: 

A. “Covered Incident” means any instance affecting 250 or more Users in which: (1) any 

United States federal, state, or local law or regulation requires Respondent to notify any U.S. 

federal, state, or local government entity that information collected or received, directly or 

indirectly, by Respondent from or about an individual consumer was, or is reasonably believed to 

have been, accessed or acquired without authorization; or (2) individually identifiable Covered 

Information collected or received, directly or indirectly, by Respondent, was, or is reasonably 

believed to have been, accessed, acquired, or publicly exposed without authorization. “Covered 

Incident” does not include instances where the only unauthorized access, acquisition, or exposure 

was due to a User communicating through Respondent’s services (e.g., public tweets, protected 

tweets, retweets, or direct messages) information that was obtained from sources other than 

Respondent. 

B. “Covered Information” means information from or about an individual consumer 

including, but not limited to: (1) a first or last name; (2) geolocation information sufficient to 

identify a street name and name of city or town; (3) an email address or other online contact 

information, such as an instant messaging User identifier or a screen name; (4) a mobile or other 

telephone number; (5) photos and videos; (6) Internet Protocol (“IP”) address, User ID, or other 

persistent identifier that can be used to recognize a User over time and across different devices, 

websites, or online services; (7) a Social Security number; (8) a driver’s license or other 

government issued identification number; (9) financial account number; (10) credit or debit 

information; (11) date of birth; (12) biometric information; or (13) any information combined 

with any of (1) through (12) above. “Covered Information” does not include information that a 

User intends to make public using Respondent’s services. 

C. “Representatives” means Respondent’s officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, 

and those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this 

Order by personal service or otherwise. 

D. “Resources” means networks, systems, and software. 

2 
 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 10 of 23 

E. “Respondent” means Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter”), and its successors and assigns. For 

purposes of Parts V and VI, Respondent means Twitter, Inc., its successors and assigns, and any 

business that Respondent controls directly or indirectly, except for any business that: (1) does not 

provide services that are offered to U.S. residents; or (2) does not collect, maintain, use, disclose, 

access, or provide access to the Covered Information of U.S. residents to enable Respondent’s 

microblogging, social networking, or communications services. 

F. “Timeline Notice” means a message Respondent places in a User’s Twitter timeline (i.e., 

the main screen the User sees when opening Twitter which displays a stream of tweets from 

accounts the User has chosen to follow) that stays near the top (i.e., within the first five (5) 

tweets) of a User’s Twitter timeline: (1) for at least six (6) months from the effective date of the 

Order; (2) until the User clicks on the “Learn More about your options” button embedded in the 

message; or (3) until the User scrolls past the message in their timeline, whichever occurs earlier. 

G. “User” means an identified individual from whom Respondent has obtained information 

for the purpose of providing access to Respondent’s products and services. 

I. PROHIBITION AGAINST MISREPRESENTATIONS 

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent and its Representatives, directly or through any 

corporation, subsidiary, division, website, mobile app, or other device, in connection with the 

offering of any product or service in or affecting commerce, must not misrepresent, in any 

manner, expressly or by implication, the extent to which Respondent maintains and protects the 

privacy, security, confidentiality, or integrity of Covered Information, including, but not limited 

to, misrepresentations related to: 

A. Respondent’s privacy and security measures to prevent unauthorized access to Covered 

Information; 

B. Respondent’s privacy and security measures to honor the privacy choices exercised by 

Users; 

C. Respondent’s collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, or deletion of Covered 

Information; 

D. The extent to which a User can control the privacy of any Covered Information 

maintained by Respondent, and the steps a User must take to implement such controls; 

E. The extent to which Respondent makes or has made Covered Information accessible to 

any third parties; 

F. The extent to which Respondent targets advertisements to Users or enables third parties 

to target advertisements to Users; or 

G. The extent to which Respondent is a member of, adheres to, complies with, is certified 

by, is endorsed by, or otherwise participates in any privacy or security program sponsored by a 

government or any self-regulatory or standard-setting organization, including but not limited to 

3 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 11 of 23 

the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework, the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield framework, and the 

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules. 

II. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF TELEPHONE NUMBERS OR EMAIL ADDRESSES 

SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED TO ENABLE ACCOUNT SECURITY FEATURES 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent and its Representatives must not use, 

provide access to, or disclose, for the purpose of serving advertisements, any telephone number 

or email address obtained from a User before the effective date of this Order for the purpose of 

enabling an account security feature (e.g., two-factor authentication, password recovery, reauthentication after detection of suspicious or malicious activity). Nothing in Provision II will 

limit Respondent’s ability to use, provide access to, or disclose such telephone numbers or email 

addresses if obtained separate and apart from a User enabling such account security feature and 

in a manner consistent with the requirements of this Order. 

III. REQUIRED NOTICE TO CONSUMERS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days after the effective date of 

this Order, Respondent must provide a Timeline Notice to all current U.S. Users who joined 

Twitter prior to September 17, 2019, that states: “Twitter’s Use of Your Personal Information 

for Tailored Advertising As we stated on Oct. 8, 2019, we may have served you targeted ads 

based on an email address or phone number you provided to us to secure your account.”, and 

includes a “Learn more about your options” button that links to a webpage showing the 

information in Exhibit A. 

IV. REQUIRED MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION OPTIONS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as of the effective date of this Order, Respondent must 

allow Users to utilize multi-factor authentication without providing a telephone number to access 

their Twitter accounts, such as by integrating authentication applications or allowing the use of 

security keys. The Company may use equivalent, widely-adopted industry authentication 

options that do not require Users to provide a telephone number and that are not multi-factor, if 

the person or persons responsible for the Program under Provision V.C: (1) approve(s) in writing 

the use of such equivalent authentication options; and (2) document(s) a written explanation of 

how the authentication options are widely-adopted and at least equivalent to the security 

provided by multi-factor authentication. 

V. MANDATED PRIVACY AND INFORMATION SECURITY PROGRAM 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent, in connection with the collection, 

maintenance, use, disclosure of, or provision of access to Covered Information, must, within one 

hundred eighty (180) days of issuance of this Order, establish and implement, and thereafter 

maintain a comprehensive privacy and information security program (the “Program”) that 

protects the privacy, security, confidentiality, and integrity of such Covered Information. To 

satisfy this requirement, Respondent must at a minimum: 

A. Document in writing the content, implementation, and maintenance of the Program; 

4 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 12 of 23 

B. Provide the written program, and any evaluations thereof or updates thereto to 

Respondent’s board of directors or governing body or, if no such board or equivalent governing 

body exists, to a senior officer of Respondent responsible for the Program at least once every 

calendar quarter; 

C. Designate a qualified employee or employees to coordinate and be responsible for the 

Program; 

D. Assess and document, at least once every twelve (12) months and promptly following the 

resolution of a Covered Incident (not to exceed ninety 90 days after the discovery of the Covered 

Incident), internal and external risks to the privacy, security, confidentiality, or integrity of 

Covered Information that could result in the: (1) unauthorized collection, maintenance, use, 

disclosure, alteration, destruction of, or provision of access to Covered Information; or the (2) 

misuse, loss, theft, or other compromise of such information; 

E. Design, implement, maintain, and document safeguards that control for the material 

internal and external risks Respondent identifies to the privacy, security, confidentiality, or 

integrity of Covered Information identified in response to Provision V.D. Each safeguard must 

be based on the volume and sensitivity of Covered Information that is at risk, and the likelihood 

that the risk could be realized and result in the: (1) unauthorized collection, maintenance, use, 

disclosure, alteration, or destruction of, or provision of access to Covered Information; or the (2) 

misuse, loss, theft, or other compromise of such information. Such safeguards must also include: 

1. Prior to implementing any new or modified product, service, or practice that 

collects, maintains, uses, discloses, or provides access to Covered Information, 

conducting an assessment of the risks to the privacy, security, confidentiality, or integrity 

of the Covered Information; 

2. For each new or modified product, service, or practice that does not pose a 

material risk to the privacy, security, confidentiality, or integrity of Covered Information, 

documenting a description of each reviewed product, service, or practice and why such 

product, service, or practice does not pose such a material risk; 

3. For each new or modified product, service, or practice that poses a material risk to 

the privacy, security, confidentiality, or integrity of Covered Information, conducting a 

privacy review and producing a written report (“Privacy Review”) for each such new or 

modified product, service, or practice. The Privacy Review must: 

(a) Describe how the product, service, or practice will collect, maintain, use, 

disclose, or provide access to Covered Information, and for how long; 

(b) Identify and describe the types of Covered Information the product, 

service, or practice will collect, maintain, use, disclose, or provide access to; 

(c) If the Covered Information will be collected from a User, describe the 

context of the interaction in which Respondent will collect such Covered 

Information (e.g., under security settings, in pop-up messages in the timeline, or 

in response to a prompt reading, “Get Better Ads!”); 

5 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 13 of 23 

(d) Describe any notice that Respondent will provide Users about the 

collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, or provision of access to the Covered 

Information; 

(e) State whether and how Respondent will obtain consent from Users for the 

collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, or provision of access to Covered 

Information; 

(f) Identify any privacy controls that will be provided to Users relevant to 

the collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, or provision of access to the Covered 

Information; 

(g) Identify any third parties to whom Respondent will disclose or provide 

access to the Covered Information; 

(h) Assess and describe the material risks to the privacy, security, 

confidentiality, and integrity of Covered Information presented by the product, 

service, or practice; 

(i) Assess and describe the safeguards to control for the identified risks, and 

whether any additional safeguards need to be implemented to control for such 

risks; 

(j) Explain the reasons why Respondent deems the notice and consent 

mechanisms described in Provisions V.E.3(d) and V.E.3(e) sufficient; 

(k) Identify and describe any limitations on the collection, maintenance, use, 

disclosure, or provision of access to Covered Information based on: (i) the context 

of the collection of such Covered Information; (ii) notice to Users; and (iii) any 

consent given by Users at the time of collection or through subsequent 

authorization; 

(l) Identify and describe any changes in how privacy and security-related 

options will be presented to Users, and describe the means and results of any 

testing Respondent performed in considering such changes, including but not 

limited to A/B testing, engagement optimization, or other testing to evaluate a 

User’s movement through a privacy or security-related pathway; 

(m) Include any other safeguards or other procedures that would mitigate the 

identified risks to the privacy, security, confidentiality, and integrity of Covered 

Information that were not implemented, and each reason that such alternatives 

were not implemented; and 

(n) Include any decision or recommendation made as a result of the review 

(e.g., whether the practice was approved, approved contingent upon safeguards or 

other recommendations being implemented, or rejected); 

6 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 14 of 23 

4. Safeguards to prevent the collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, or access to 

Covered Information beyond the limitations identified in Provision V.E.3(k), including: 

(a) Regular training, at least once a year, for any employees and independent 

contractors whose responsibilities include the collection, maintenance, disclosure, 

use, or provision of access to Covered Information, on the permissible collection, 

maintenance, disclosure, use, or provision of access to Covered Information and 

any related limitations; 

(b) Written attestations by those employees and independent contractors that 

they will not collect, maintain, disclose, use, or provide access to the Covered 

Information in a manner inconsistent with those limitations; 

(c) Designation of a senior officer, or senior level team composed of no more 

than five (5) persons, to be responsible for any decision to collect, maintain, use, 

disclose, or provide access to the Covered Information; and 

(d) Treating any new method of collecting, maintaining, using, disclosing, 

providing access to, or deleting the Covered Information as a new or modified 

product, service, or practice requiring the reviews set forth in Provisions V.E.1-3; 

5. Regular privacy and information security training programs for all employees and 

independent contractors on at least an annual basis, updated to address any identified 

material internal or external risks and safeguards implemented pursuant to this Order; 

6. Technical measures to monitor Respondent’s Resources to identify unauthorized 

attempts to: (a) access, modify, or exfiltrate Covered Information from Respondent’s 

Resources; or (b) access or take over Users’ accounts; and 

7. Data access policies and controls for all: (a) databases storing Covered 

Information; (b) Resources that provide access to Users’ accounts; and (c) Resources 

containing information that enables or facilitates access to Respondent’s internal network 

and systems; 

F. Assess, at least once every twelve (12) months and promptly (not to exceed thirty (30) 

days) following the resolution of a Covered Incident, the sufficiency of any safeguards in place 

to address the internal and external risks to the privacy, security, confidentiality, or integrity of 

Covered Information, and modify the Program based on the results; 

G. Test and monitor the effectiveness of the safeguards at least once every twelve (12) 

months and promptly (not to exceed thirty (30) days) following the resolution of a Covered 

Incident, and modify the Program based on the results. Such testing and monitoring must 

include: (1) vulnerability testing of Respondent’s network(s) once every four (4) months and 

promptly (not to exceed thirty (30) days) after an unauthorized intrusion into Respondent’s 

Resources; and (2) penetration testing of Respondent’s network(s) at least once every twelve 

(12) months and promptly (not to exceed thirty (30) days) after an unauthorized intrusion into 

Respondent’s Resources; 

7 
 

 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 15 of 23 

H. Select and retain service providers capable of safeguarding Covered Information they 

access through or receive from Respondent, and contractually require service providers to 

implement and maintain safeguards sufficient to address the internal and external risks to the 

privacy, security, confidentiality, or integrity of Covered Information; and 

I. Evaluate and adjust the Program in light of any changes to Respondent’s operations or 

business arrangements, a Covered Incident, new or more efficient technological or operational 

methods to control for the risks identified in Provision V.D of this Order, or any other 

circumstances that Respondent knows or has reason to believe may have an impact on the 

effectiveness of the Program or any of its individual safeguards. At a minimum, Respondent 

must evaluate the Program at least once every twelve (12) months and modify the Program based 

on the results. 

VI. INDEPENDENT PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS BY A THIRD PARTY 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in connection with compliance with Provision V of 

this Order titled Mandated Privacy and Information Security Program, Respondent must obtain 

initial and biennial assessments (“Assessments”): 

A. The Assessments must be obtained from one or more qualified, objective, independent 

third-party professionals (“Assessor(s)”) who: (1) use procedures and standards generally 

accepted in the profession; (2) conduct an independent review of the Program; (3) retain all 

documents relevant to each Assessment for five (5) years after completion of such Assessment; 

and (4) will provide such documents to the Commission within ten (10) days of receipt of a 

written request from a representative of the Commission. No documents relating to 

Respondent’s compliance with this Order may be withheld from the Commission by the 

Assessor on the basis of a claim of confidentiality, proprietary or trade secrets, work product 

protection, attorney-client privilege, statutory exemption, or any similar claim. Respondent may 

obtain separate assessments for (1) privacy and (2) information security from multiple Assessors, 

so long as each of the Assessors meets the qualifications set forth above; 

B. For each Assessment, Respondent must provide the Associate Director for Enforcement 

for the Bureau of Consumer Protection at the Federal Trade Commission with the name, 

affiliation, and qualifications of the proposed Assessor, whom the Associate Director shall have 

the authority to approve in her or his sole discretion; 

C. The reporting period for the Assessments must cover: (1) the first three-hundred-andsixty-five (365) days after the issuance date of the Order for the initial Assessment; and (2) each 

two-year period thereafter for twenty (20) years after issuance of the Order for the biennial 

Assessments; 

D. Each Assessment must, for the entire assessment period: (1) determine whether 

Respondent has implemented and maintained the Program required by Provision V of this Order, 

titled Mandated Privacy and Information Security Program; (2) assess the effectiveness of 

Respondent’s implementation and maintenance of Provisions V.A-I; (3) identify any gaps or 

weaknesses in, or instances of material noncompliance with, the Program; (4) address the status 

of gaps or weaknesses in, or instances of material non-compliance with, the Program that were 

8 
 

 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 16 of 23 

identified in any prior Assessment required by this Order; and (5) identify specific evidence 

(including, but not limited to, documents reviewed, sampling and testing performed, and 

interviews conducted) examined to make such determinations, assessments, and identifications, 

and explain why the evidence that the Assessor examined is: (a) appropriate for assessing an 

enterprise of Respondent’s size, complexity, and risk profile; and (b) sufficient to justify the 

Assessor’s findings. No finding of any Assessment shall rely primarily on assertions or 

attestations by Respondent’s management. The Assessment must be signed by the Assessor, 

state that the Assessor conducted an independent review of the Program and did not rely 

primarily on assertions or attestations by Respondent’s management. To the extent that 

Respondent revises, updates, or adds one or more safeguards required under Provision V.E of 

this Order during an Assessment period, the Assessment must assess the effectiveness of the 

revised, updated, or added safeguard(s) for the time period in which it was in effect, and provide 

a separate statement detailing the basis for each revised, updated, or additional safeguard; and 

E. Each Assessment must be completed within sixty (60) days after the end of the reporting 

period to which the Assessment applies. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission 

representative in writing, Respondent must submit the initial Assessment to the Commission 

within ten (10) days after the Assessment has been completed via email to DEbrief@ftc.gov or 

by overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to Associate Director for Enforcement, Bureau 

of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20580. The subject line must begin, “In re Twitter, Inc., FTC File No. 202-

3062.” All subsequent biennial Assessments must be retained by Respondent until the Order is 

terminated and provided to the Associate Director for Enforcement within ten (10) days of 

request. 

VII. COOPERATION WITH THIRD-PARTY ASSESSOR(S) 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent and its Representatives, whether acting 

directly or indirectly, in connection with any Assessment required by Provision VI of this Order 

titled Independent Program Assessments by a Third Party, must: 

A. Provide or otherwise make available to the Assessor all information and material in their 

possession, custody, or control that is relevant to the Assessment for which there is no reasonable 

claim of privilege; 

B. Provide or otherwise make available to the Assessor information about Respondent’s 

Resources(s) and all of Respondent’s IT assets so that the Assessor can determine the scope of 

the Assessment, and have visibility to Resource(s) and IT assets deemed in scope; and 

C. Disclose all material facts to the Assessor(s), and not misrepresent in any manner, 

expressly or by implication, any fact material to the Assessor’s: (1) determination of whether 

Respondent has implemented and maintained the Program required by Provision V of this Order, 

titled Mandated Privacy and Information Security Program; (2) assessment of the effectiveness 

of the implementation and maintenance of Provisions V.A-I; or (3) identification of any gaps or 

weaknesses in, or instances of material noncompliance with, the Program. 

9 
 

 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 17 of 23 

VIII. CERTIFICATIONS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must: 

A. One year after the issuance date of this Order, and each year thereafter, provide the 

Commission with a certification from a senior corporate manager, or, if no such senior corporate 

manager exists, a senior officer of Respondent responsible for the Program that: (1) Respondent 

has established, implemented, and maintained the requirements of this Order; (2) Respondent is 

not aware of any material noncompliance that has not been (a) corrected or (b) disclosed to the 

Commission; and (3) includes a brief description of all Covered Incidents during the certified 

period. The certification must be based on the personal knowledge of the senior corporate 

manager, senior officer, or subject matter experts upon whom the senior corporate manager or 

senior officer reasonably relies in making the certification; and 

B. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, submit all annual 

certifications to the Commission pursuant to this Order via email to DEbrief@ftc.gov or by 

overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to Associate Director for Enforcement, Bureau of 

Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20580. The subject line must begin, “In re Twitter, Inc., FTC File No. 202-3062.” 

IX. COVERED INCIDENT REPORTS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent, within thirty (30) days after Respondent’s 

discovery of a Covered Incident, must submit a report to the Commission. The report must 

include, to the extent possible: 

A. The date, estimated date, or estimated date range when the Covered Incident occurred; 

B. A description of the facts relating to the Covered Incident, including the causes of the 

Covered Incident, if known; 

C. A description of each type of Covered Information that was affected or triggered any 

notification obligation to the U.S. federal, state, or local government entity; 

D. The number of Users whose Covered Information was affected or triggered any 

notification obligation to the U.S. federal, state, or local government entity; 

E. The acts that Respondent has taken to date to remediate the Covered Incident and protect 

Covered Information from further exposure or access, and protect affected individuals from 

identity theft or other harm that may result from the Covered Incident; and 

F. A representative copy of any materially different notice sent by Respondent to consumers 

or to any U.S. federal, state, or local government entity. 

Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all Covered 

Incident reports to the Commission pursuant to this Order must be emailed to DEbrief@ftc.gov 

or sent by overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to Associate Director for Enforcement, 

Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 

10 
 

 

 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 18 of 23 

Washington, DC 20580. The subject line must begin, “In re Twitter, Inc., FTC File No. 202-

3062.” 

X. ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent obtain acknowledgments of receipt of this 

Order: 

A. Respondent, within ten (10) days after the effective date of this Order, must submit to the 

Commission an acknowledgment of receipt of this Order sworn under penalty of perjury. 

B. For five (5) years after the issuance date of this Order, Respondent must deliver a copy of 

this Order to: (1) all principals, officers, directors, and LLC managers and members; (2) all 

employees having managerial responsibilities relating to the subject matter of this Order, and all 

agents and representatives who participate in any acts or practices subject to this Order; and (3) 

any business entity resulting from any change in structure as set forth in the Provision titled 

Compliance Report and Notices. Delivery must occur within ten (10) days after the effective 

date of this Order for current personnel. For all others, delivery must occur before they assume 

their responsibilities. 

C. From each individual or entity to which Respondent delivered a copy of this Order, 

Respondent must obtain, within thirty (30) days, a signed and dated acknowledgment of receipt 

of this Order, which can be obtained electronically. 

XI. COMPLIANCE REPORTING AND NOTICES 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent makes timely submissions to the 

Commission: 

A. Two-hundred and forty (240) days after the issuance date of this Order, Respondent must 

submit a compliance report, sworn under penalty of perjury, in which Respondent: (1) identifies 

the primary physical, postal, and email address and telephone number, as designated points of 

contact, which representatives of the Commission may use to communicate with Respondent; (2) 

identifies all of Respondent’s businesses by all of their names, telephone numbers, and physical, 

postal, email, and Internet addresses; (3) describes the activities of each business, including the 

goods and services offered and the means of advertising, marketing, and sales; (4) describes in 

detail whether and how Respondent is in compliance with each Provision of this Order; and (5) 

provides a copy of each Acknowledgment of the Order obtained pursuant to this Order, unless 

previously submitted to the Commission. 

B. Respondent must submit a compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 

fourteen (14) days of any change in the following: (1) any designated point of contact; (2) the 

structure of Respondent or any entity that Respondent has any ownership interest in or controls 

directly or indirectly that may affect compliance obligations arising under this Order, including: 

creation, merger, sale, or dissolution of the entity or any subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that 

engages in any acts or practices subject to this Order; (3) the filing of any bankruptcy petition, 

insolvency proceeding, or similar proceeding by or against Respondent. 

11 
 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 19 of 23 

C. Any submission to the Commission required by this Order to be sworn under penalty of 

perjury must be true and accurate and comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, such as by concluding: “I 

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 

foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: _____” and supplying the date, signatory’s full 

name, title (if applicable), and signature. 

D. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all submissions to 

the Commission pursuant to this Order must be emailed to DEbrief@ftc.gov or sent by overnight 

courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to: Associate Director for Enforcement, Bureau of 

Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20580. The subject line must begin: “In re Twitter, Inc., FTC File No. 202-3062.” 

XII. RECORDKEEPING 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent must create certain records for twenty (20) 

years after the issuance date of the Order, and retain each such record for five (5) years. 

Specifically, Respondent must create and retain the following records: 

A. Accounting records showing the revenues from all goods or services sold; 

B. Personnel records showing, for each person that Respondent contracts with directly and 

that provides services in relation to any aspect of the Order, whether as an employee or 

otherwise, that person’s: name; addresses; telephone numbers; job title or position; dates of 

service; and (if applicable) the reason for termination; 

C. Copies or records of all U.S. consumer complaints concerning the subject matter of the 

Order, and any responses to such complaints; 

D. A copy of each unique advertisement or other marketing material making a representation 

subject to this Order; 

E. A copy of each widely-disseminated representation by Respondent or its Representatives 

that describe the extent to which Respondent maintains and protects the privacy, security, 

confidentiality, or integrity of Covered Information, including, but not limited to, (1) statements 

relating to any change in any product, service, or practice that relates to the privacy, security, 

confidentiality, or integrity of such information, and (2) statements relating to: (a) Respondent’s 

privacy and security measures to prevent unauthorized access to Covered Information; 

(b) Respondent’s privacy and security measures to honor the privacy choices exercised by Users; 

(c) Respondent’s collection, maintenance, use, disclosure, or deletion of Covered Information; 

(d) the extent to which a User can control the privacy of any Covered Information maintained by 

Respondent, and the steps a User must take to implement such controls; (e) the extent to which 

Respondent makes or has made Covered Information accessible to any third parties; (f) the 

extent to which Respondent allows third parties to serve advertisements to Users; or (g) the 

extent to which Respondent is a member of, adheres to, complies with, is certified by, is 

endorsed by, or otherwise participates in any privacy or security program sponsored by a 

government or any self-regulatory or standard-setting organization, including but not limited to 

the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework, the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield framework, and the 

APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules; 

12 
 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 20 of 23 

F. All materials relied upon in making the statements in Provisions XII.D and XII.E, and 

copies of each materially different notice provided to Users and mechanisms for obtaining a 

User’s consent for the collection, use, or disclosure of Covered Information (including 

screenshots/screencasts and User interfaces, consent flows, and paths a User must take to reach 

such settings); 

G. All materials relied upon to prepare the Assessment, whether prepared by or on behalf of 

Respondent, including all plans, reports, studies, reviews, audits, audit trails, policies, training 

materials, and assessments, and any other materials concerning Respondent’s compliance with 

related Provisions of this Order, for the compliance period covered by such Assessment; 

H. For 5 years from the date received, copies of all subpoenas, information provided in 

response to such subpoenas, and all material correspondence with law enforcement, if such 

communication relate to Respondent’s compliance with this Order; 

I. For 5 years from the date created or received, all records, whether prepared by or on 

behalf of Respondent, that contradict, qualify, or call into question Respondent’s compliance 

with this Order; and 

J. All records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each Provision of this Order, 

including all submissions to the Commission. 

XIII. COMPLIANCE MONITORING 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the purpose of monitoring Respondent’s 

compliance with this Order: 

A. Within fourteen (14) days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the 

Commission, Respondent must: submit additional compliance reports or other requested 

information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury; appear for depositions; and produce 

records for inspection and copying. The Commission is also authorized to obtain discovery, 

without further leave of court, using any of the procedures prescribed by Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure 29, 30 (including telephonic depositions), 31, 33, 34, 36, 45, and 69. 

B. For matters concerning this Order, representatives of the Commission are authorized to 

communicate directly with Respondent. Respondent must permit representatives of the 

Commission to interview anyone affiliated with Respondent who has agreed to such an 

interview. The interviewee may have counsel present. 

C. The Commission may use all other lawful means, including posing through its 

representatives as consumers, suppliers, or other individuals or entities, to Respondent or any 

individual or entity affiliated with Respondent, without the necessity of identification or prior 

notice. Nothing in this Order limits the Commission’s lawful use of compulsory process, 

pursuant to Sections 9 and 20 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 49, 57b-1. 

13 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 21 of 23 

XIV. ORDER EFFECTIVE DATES 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is final and effective upon the date of its 

publication on the Commission’s website (ftc.gov) as a final order. This Order will terminate 

twenty (20) years from the date of its issuance (which date may be stated at the end of this Order, 

near the Commission’s seal), or twenty (20) years from the most recent date that the United 

States or the Commission files a complaint (with or without an accompanying settlement) in 

federal court alleging any violation of this Order, whichever comes later; provided, however, that 

the filing of such a complaint will not affect the duration of: 

A. Any Provision in this Order that terminates in less than twenty (20) years; 

B. This Order if such complaint is filed after the Order has terminated pursuant to this 

Provision. 

Provided, further, that if such complaint is dismissed or a federal court rules that 

Respondent did not violate any Provision of the Order, and the dismissal or ruling is either not 

appealed or upheld on appeal, then the Order will terminate according to this Provision as though 

the complaint had never been filed, except that the Order will not terminate between the date 

such complaint is filed and the later of the deadline for appealing such dismissal or ruling and the 

date such dismissal or ruling is upheld on appeal. 

By the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

SEAL: 

ISSUED: 

14 
Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 22 of 23 

Exhibit A to 

Attachment A 

EXHIBIT A 

[To appear with the Twitter logo and Twitter’s standard website header] 

We may have asked for your phone number or email address to secure or authenticate your 

account (for example, for two-factor authentication). As we told you in October 2019, we may 

have used these phone numbers or email addresses to deliver tailored advertising to you on 

Twitter until September 2019. On [date], we entered into a settlement with the Federal Trade 

Commission to resolve this issue. 

As of September 17, 2019, we are no longer using phone numbers or email addresses collected 

for safety or security purposes for advertising. We never disclosed or shared your phone number 

or email address with advertisers. There is no action that you need to take regarding this issue. 

You have a number of options to control your privacy and security when you use Twitter: 

භ Control your privacy settings. You can find out more about your privacy settings on 

Twitter, including how to enable or disable personalized ads, by visiting 

https://myprivacy.twitter.com. 

භ Review your multi-factor authentication settings. By requiring both a password and a 

secondary code or security key to access your account, multi-factor authentication can help 

keep your account safe. You can use an authentication app, a security key, or a phone 

number for multi-factor authentication. (And if you provide us a phone number for multifactor authentication, it will not be used for advertising purposes without your consent.) You 

can learn about multi-factor authentication settings by visiting 

https://help.twitter.com/en/managing-your-account/two-factor-authentication. 

For more details about how we protect the information you share with us and how we use that 

data, we encourage you to visit the Twitter Privacy Center. 

We are very sorry this happened. If you have questions or comments about this notice or what we 

do to protect your information moving forward, you may contact Twitter’s Office of Data 

Protection through this form. 

[To appear with the Twitter’s standard website footer] 
 

Case 3:22-cv-03070 Document 5-1 Filed 05/25/22 Page 23 of 23 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

In the Matter of 

Docket No. C-4316 

TWITTER, Inc., 

a corporation. 

DECISION 

The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) issued a Decision and Order against 

Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter) in Docket C-4316 on March 2, 2011 (“2011 order”).1 On [INSERT 

DATE], the United States of America, acting upon notification and authorization to the Attorney 

General by the Commission, filed a complaint (“2022 complaint”) in federal district court alleging 

that Twitter violated the 2011 order by misrepresenting the extent to which it maintained and 

protected the privacy of nonpublic consumer information. The complaint also alleged that Twitter 

violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by misrepresenting how it would use telephone numbers and 

email addresses that users provided to enable a security feature. 

On [INSERT DATE], Judge [INSERT JUDGE’S NAME] in the District for the Northern 

District of California entered a Stipulated Order for Civil Penalty, Monetary Judgment, and 

Injunctive Relief (“Stipulated Order”) resolving the 2022 complaint. In Section II of the 

Stipulated Order, Twitter consented to: (1) reopening the 2011 proceeding in FTC Docket No. C4316; (2) waiving its rights under the show cause procedures set forth in Section 3.72(b) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.72(b); and (3) modifying the 2011 Order with the 

new Decision and Order set forth below. 

In view of the foregoing, the Commission has determined that it is in the public interest to 

reopen the proceeding in Docket No. C-4316 pursuant to Commission Rule 3.72(b), 16 C.F.R. 

§ 3.72(b), and to issue a new order as set forth below. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter be, and it hereby is, reopened; and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, Twitter having consented to modifying the 2011 

order as set forth below, the Commission hereby modifies the 2011 order with the attached 

Decision and Order. 

1 In the Matter of Twitter, Inc., C-4316, 151 FTC LEXIS 162 (F.T.C. March 2, 2011). 

1