alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kemmerer Iron & Steel Company *v.*Bittenbender, Appellant.

*Appeals*— Arbitration—Referee’s *findings of facts.*

A referee’s findings of fact confirmed by the court below and based upon sufficient evidence will not be reversed by the appellate court in the absence of manifest error.

Argued Feb. 22, 1911.

March 20, 1911:

Appeal, No. 355, Jan. T., 1910, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. Term, 1907, No. 1520, dismissing exceptions to referee’s report in case of Kemmerer Iron & Steel Company v. W. E. Bittenbender et al.

Before Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Exceptions to report of William Leach, Esq., referee.

*Errors assigned*were in dismissing exceptions to referee’s report.

*Samuel B. Price,*with him *Cole B. Pierce*and *W. W. Baylor,*for appellants.

*B. L. Levy,*with him *John P. Kelly, C. P. O’Malley*and *George B. Taylor,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

As suggested by the learned counsel for the appellants, the crucial question in the case is whether the $9,000 of bonds issued by the appellee company were purchased *155by the appellants or were taken as collateral security for the indebtedness of the appellee to the appellants. The referee found that the bonds in question were sold and not pledged to the appellants. The finding of the referee was confirmed by the court below. After a careful consideration of the case, we find sufficient evidence before the referee to warrant his finding and having been approved by the court, it will not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.
#### David RAMSEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-585.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 20, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1





October 13, 2015Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Stephanie Higgins918-591-5026





ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Third-quarter


2015 Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





TULSA, Okla. - Oct. 13, 2015 - ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will release their third-quarter 2015 earnings after the market closes on Nov. 3, 2015.





ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ executive management will participate in a joint conference call the following day at 11 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (10 a.m. Central Standard Time) on Nov. 4, 2015.  The call also will be carried live on ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ websites.





To participate in the telephone conference call, dial 888-505-4368, pass code 1733240, or log on to www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





|      |                                                                                 
|----- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|What: | ONEOK and ONEOK Partners third-quarter 2015 earnings conference call and webcast




|      |                              
|----- | -----------------------------
|When: | 11 a.m. Eastern, Nov. 4, 2015

10 a.m. Central





|       |                                                               
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Where: | 1) Phone conference call: dial 888-505-4368, pass code 1733240

2) Log on to the webcast at www.oneok.com


3) Log on to the webcast at www.oneokpartners.com





If you are unable to participate in the conference call or the webcast, the replay will be available on ONEOK’s website, www.oneok.com , and ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com , for 30 days.  A recording will be available by phone for seven days.  The playback call may be accessed at 888-203-1112, pass code 1733240.








ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE ) is the general partner and as of Aug. 21, 2015, owns 41.2 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent, Permian and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers and is a leader in the gathering,


-more-


---



ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Third-quarter 2015


Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





Page 2





processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S.  ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the websites at www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews and @ONEOKPartners .


###
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,299,959
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,223,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 13,478,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,999,646
<PP&E>                                       1,293,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 237,244
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,520,523
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,166,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,884
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,947,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,520,523
<SALES>                                     14,789,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,289,063
<CGS>                                       12,255,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,255,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            24,764,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,782,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,782,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,782,860)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.08)


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7875 

To require States and units of local governments to enforce stay-at-home 

orders equally, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2020 

Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. 

GIBBS, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. FLORES, Mr. BUDD, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of 

Tennessee, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. GUEST, Mr. CLINE, Mr. HICE

of Georgia, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina, Mr. BABIN, Mr. 

DUNCAN, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. MEUSER, Mr. ADERHOLT, 

Mr. TIMMONS, and Mr. GREEN of Tennessee) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require States and units of local governments to enforce 

stay-at-home orders equally, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Opportunity 

5 First Amendment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EQUAL ENFORCEMENT OF STAY-AT-HOME ORDERS. 

7 In the case that a State or unit of local government 

8 issues an order that limits gatherings to a certain number 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7875 IH

1 of people pursuant to a national emergency declared by 

2 the President under the National Emergencies Act (50 

3 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) or a similar State emergency declara4 tion, the State or unit of local government may not dis5 criminate in the enforcement of such order, in the case 

6 of persons who are exercising a right protected under the 

7 First Amendment. 

8 SEC. 3. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION. 

9 A person who is harmed by a violation of section 2 

10 may bring an action in the appropriate district court of 

11 the United States seeking relief. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                     1,564,816
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              7,060,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                 103,374
<INVENTORY>                                9,738,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          21,193,775
<PP&E>                                    86,825,331
<DEPRECIATION>                            34,746,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           104,280,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     17,300,426
<BONDS>                                   29,554,515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                   1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                                53,735,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             104,280,006
<SALES>                                   17,992,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          30,455,219
<CGS>                                     16,748,633
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             11,531,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,467,307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              707,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                 187,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           31,530
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  31,530
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .05



</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A2 19 9 . MI CHAEL BERNARD BROADNAX v . THE STATE

On J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 6 , t h i s Co u rt g ran t ed M i ch ael Bern ard Bro ad n ax ’ s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

ap p eal fro m

a t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d en y i n g h i s m o t i o n fo r an o u t -o ft i m e ap p eal

. Th e o rd er d i rect ed t h at t h e ap p el l an t fi l e a n o t i ce o f ap p e a l wi t h i n 1 0 d ay s o f t h e d at e o f t h e o rd er. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (j). Twen t y -fo u r d ay s lat er, o n J u l y 8 , 2 0 1 6 , Bro ad n ax fi l ed h i s n ot i ce o f ap p eal

. Aft er t h e cas e was d o ck et ed
, Th e St at e, fi led a m o t i o n t o d i s m i s s. Th e t i m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s an ab s o lu t e req u irem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i ct i o n o n t h i s Co u rt

. W h i t e v. W h i t e , 1 8 8 Ga. Ap p

. 5 5 6 (3 7 3 SE2 d 8 2 4 ) (1 9 8 8 ).
Becau s e Bro ad n ax fai l ed t o fi l e a n o t i c e o f ap p eal wi t h in 1 0 d ay s of o u r o rd er
g ran t i n g t h e d i s cret io n ary ap p l icat i o n , th e n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s u n t i m el y

. Acco rd i n g l y , t h e m ot i o n t o d i s m i ss i s h ereb y GRANTED, an d t hi s ap p eal i s DISM ISSED fo r l ack

o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -4 8 (b ) (1 ); B ar n es v. Ju st i s , 2 2 3 Ga. Ap p

. 67 1 , 6 7 1

- 6 7 2 (4 78 SE2 d 4 0 2 ) (1 9 9 6 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/05/2016 October 05, 2016
# Službeni list C 335A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1088
  doi:10.3000/19771088.CA2013.335.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 335A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | 5616. studenoga 2013. |

ISSN 1977-1088

doi:10.3000/19771088.CA2013.335.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 335A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

5616. studenoga 2013.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2013/C 335A/01 | Ispravak obavijesti o otvorenim natječajima — EPSO/AD/267/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za njemački jezik (DE) — EPSO/AD/268/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za latvijski jezik (LV) — EPSO/AD/269/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za nizozemski jezik (NL) — EPSO/AD/270/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za portugalski jezik (PT) (SL C 301 A, 17.10.2013.) | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2013/C 335A/01

Ispravak obavijesti o otvorenim natječajima — EPSO/AD/267/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za njemački jezik (DE) — EPSO/AD/268/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za latvijski jezik (LV) — EPSO/AD/269/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za nizozemski jezik (NL) — EPSO/AD/270/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za portugalski jezik (PT) (SL C 301 A, 17.10.2013.)

(SL C 301 A, 17.10.2013.)

1

PREGLED NATJEČAJA SL C A

Dolje je naveden popis SL C A objavljenih u tekućoj godini.

Ako nije drugačije navedeno, SL je objavljen u svim jezičnim inačicama.

| 191 | |
| --- | --- |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 204 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 210 | (LV) |
| 211 | (PL) |
| 219 | |
| 227 | |
| 231 | |
| 235 | |
| 240 | |
| 264 | |
| 269 | |
| 276 | |
| 277 | |
| 279 | (PT) |
| 286 | (ET) |
| 289 | |
| 290 | |
| 292 | (SK) |
| 293 | (EN) |
| 294 | (DE) |
| 295 | (DA) |
| 299 | |
| 300 | (LT) |
| 301 | |
| 302 | |
| 308 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 309 | |
| 310 | |
| 317 | |
| 320 | |
| 321 | |
| 322 | |
| 335 | |

191

192

193

194

196

197

199

200

204

(DE/EN/FR)

210

(LV)

211

(PL)

219

227

231

235

240

264

269

276

277

279

(PT)

286

(ET)

289

290

292

(SK)

293

(EN)

294

(DE)

295

(DA)

299

300

(LT)

301

302

308

(DE/EN/FR)

309

310

317

320

321

322

335

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 16.11.2013 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 335/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2013

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 335/1

---

Ispravak obavijesti o otvorenim natječajima

EPSO/AD/267/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za njemački jezik (DE)

EPSO/AD/268/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za latvijski jezik (LV)

EPSO/AD/269/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za nizozemski jezik (NL)

EPSO/AD/270/13 – Pravnici lingvisti (AD 7) za portugalski jezik (PT)

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 301 A od 17. listopada 2013.
  )

(2013/C 335 A/01)

Stranica 6., odjeljak VIII., točka 1.:

umjesto:

„Rok za prijavu (uključujući potvrđivanje prijave): 19. studenoga 2013. u podne (12.00) prema briselskom vremenu.”

treba stajati:

„Rok za prijavu (uključujući potvrđivanje prijave): 28. studenoga 2013. u podne (12.00) prema briselskom vremenu.”

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 79 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 79

  To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or 
   establishment of national monuments in Arizona except by express 
           authorization of Congress, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

 Mr. Biggs (for himself and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 54, United States Code, to prohibit the extension or 
   establishment of national monuments in Arizona except by express 
           authorization of Congress, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON EXTENSION OR ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN ARIZONA.

    Subsection (d) of section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or Arizona'' after ``Wyoming''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or Arizona'' after ``Wyoming''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED APRIL 15, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-15-2000
<CASH>                                          20,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  478,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                    35,957
<INVENTORY>                                    860,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,523,528
<PP&E>                                       1,507,958
<DEPRECIATION>                                 700,413
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,313,066
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,090,230
<BONDS>                                      1,189,934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,113
<OTHER-SE>                                     436,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,313,066
<SALES>                                      4,444,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,444,804
<CGS>                                        4,028,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,427,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,698
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,265)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (17,392)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.67)


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7677 

To require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on 

use of domestic nonavailability determinations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2020 

Mr. BRINDISI (for himself and Mr. MCKINLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress 

a report on use of domestic nonavailability determinations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening Amer5 ican Manufacturing Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON USE OF DOMESTIC NONAVAILABILITY 

7 DETERMINATIONS. 

8 Not later than September 30, 2021, and annually 

9 thereafter, the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report 

10 to congressional defense committees— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7677 IH

1 (1) describing in detail the use of any waiver or 

2 exception by the Department of Defense to the re3 quirements of chapter 83 of title 41, United States 

4 Code, or section 2533a of title 10, United States 

5 Code, relating to domestic nonavailability determina6 tions; 

7 (2) specifying the type of waiver or exception 

8 used; and 

9 (3) providing an assessment of the impact on 

10 the use of such waivers or exceptions due to the 

11 COVID–19 pandemic and associated challenges with 

12 investments in domestic sources. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-16-00165-CR

KELON DEWON DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 71st District Court

Harrison County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-0392x

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Kelon Dewon Davis pled true to the State’s motion to adjudicate his guilt for evading arrest 

or detention with a previous conviction and was sentenced to fourteen months’ incarceration. His 

notice of appeal was timely filed September 15, 2016. The clerk’s record was filed November 18, 

2016, and the reporter’s record was filed November 28, 2016, making Davis’ brief originally due 

December 28, 2016. When neither the brief nor a request for extension of time in which to file the 

brief was filed before the due date, this Court, sua sponte, extended the briefing deadline fifteen 

days and advised Davis that his brief was due on or before January 20, 2017. To date, no brief has 

been filed. 

Davis is represented by retained counsel, Vernard G. Solomon. After having received this 

Court’s late brief notice, Solomon advised this Court by telephone that Davis may have left the 

country. In light of Solomon’s representation to this Court that Davis may have absconded, and 

in light of the fact that no brief has been filed, we abate this case to the trial court pursuant to Rule

38.8(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for a hearing to determine why counsel has not 

filed the brief, whether the brief can be promptly filed with this Court irrespective of Davis’ 

whereabouts, whether Davis desires to prosecute his appeal, and whether he is indigent. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). The hearing is to be conducted within fifteen days of the date of this order. 

The trial court may also address other matters as it deems appropriate.

The trial court’s findings and recommendations on the issues set forth above shall be 

entered into the record of the case and presented to this Court in the form of a supplemental clerk’s 

record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See TEX.R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). The reporter’s 
3

record of the hearing shall also be filed with this Court in the form of a supplemental reporter’s 

record within fifteen days of the date of the hearing. See id.

All appellate timetables are stayed and will resume on our receipt of (1) the appellant’s 

brief or (2) the supplemental appellate record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: February 2, 2017