alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C><ARTICLE>    5<LEGEND>    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROMTHE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000.<MULTIPLIER>    1,000<S>                                                      <C><PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS<PERIOD-START>                                   Jan-01-2000<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                Dec-31-2000<PERIOD-END>                                     Jun-30-2000<CASH>                                                 3,351<SECURITIES>                                               0<RECEIVABLES>                                          5,723<ALLOWANCES>                                             190<INVENTORY>                                                0<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      14,772<PP&E>                                                 3,863<DEPRECIATION>                                         2,133<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        18,038<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  6,362<BONDS>                                                    0<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0<PREFERRED>                                                0<COMMON>                                                  42<OTHER-SE>                                            11,634<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          18,038<SALES>                                                8,233<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      10,639<CGS>                                                    166<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,798<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      12,790<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (6,525)<INCOME-TAX>                                               9<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (6,525)<DISCONTINUED>                                             0<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        3,076<CHANGES>                                                  0<NET-INCOME>                                         (6,889)<EPS-BASIC>                                           (1.66)<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.66)</TABLE>
July 1, 2015

Mr. Jeremy Avants

Owner

From Above Photo Image

408 Winter Hawk

McGregor , TX 76657

Dear Mr. Avants :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

part 21 ; § § 45.23(b)

, 61.3

, 91.7(a)

, 91.9(b)(2)

, 91.103

, 91.109

, 91.119

, 91.121

, 91.151(a)

, 91.203(a) and (b)

, 91.205(b)

, 91.215 , 91.405 (a)

, 407(a)(1)

, 409(a)(2)

, and 417(a) and (b) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your April 15, 2015

, exemption request on behalf of From Above Photo Image

into the public docket (No. FAA− 20 15

− 1375 ), but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exem ption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Aircraft and

Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 23


                    CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  of Proginet  Corporation  on Form S-8 (File No.  33-71068)  effective
October 5, 2001,  of our report  dated  September  23,  2004,  on the  financial
statements included in the Annual report of Proginet  Corporation of Form 10-KSB
as of and for the year ended July 31, 2004



BDO SEIDMAN LLP


Melville, New York
September 27, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements of Financial Condition at August 31, 1996 (Unaudited) and
the Statement of Income for the six months ended August 31, 1996 (Unaudited) and
is qualified in its reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000036548
<NAME> FIRST MORTGAGE CORPORATION
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         336,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  234,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             619
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 601,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,973
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   601,293
<SALES>                                         38,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           30,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,650
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Sylvia MAZZULA, Appellant, v. Vincent MAZZULA, Appellee.

No. 71-618.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 15, 1971.

Stephen J. Johnson, Jr., of Johnson & Pánico, Maitland, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

OWEN, Judge.

Appellant brings for review a post judgment order which, among other things, reduced the amount of child support payments for which her former husband had been obligated under the final judgment of divorce.

The final judgment established the extent of the father’s obligation for support of his minor children. In order for him to be entitled to a modification of this obligation for support, it is fundamental that he must prove a change in financial circumstances occurring subsequent to the final judgment, either in his ability to provide, or in the needs of the children. Sistrunk v. Sistrunk, Fla.App.1970, 235 So. 2d 53; Chandler v. Chandler, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 697; Simmons v. Simmons, Fla. App.1966, 192 So.2d 325 and Cherney v. Cherney, Fla.App.1962, 146 So.2d 914.

Appellee’s petition for modification of support payments did not allege, and the evidence in support thereof did not show, any change in financial circumstances oc*63curring subsequent to the final judgment, either in his ability to support the minor children or in the children’s needs.

We reverse that portion of the order appealed which modifies appellee’s obligation for child support payments as theretofore established by the final judgment. In all other respects the order is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

WALDEN, J., concurs.

CROSS, J., dissents, with opinion.

CROSS, Judge

(dissenting).

I respectfully dissent as to that part of the opinion which sets forth that the evidence did not show a change in financial conditions occurring subsequent to entry of final judgment to support the order on appeal. Although the petition for modification of support payments did not allege sufficient facts, it nevertheless went unchallenged, and the change in circumstances subsequent to entry of final judgment was made and tried as an issue before the learned chancellor, and the evidence supports his order on appeal. I would affirm.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q,
February 1, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-mos                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  AUG-02-1997             AUG-02-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     NOV-03-1996             NOV-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       FEB-01-1997             FEB-01-1997
<CASH>                                  55,542                  55,542
<SECURITIES>                                 0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                          343,828                 343,828
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0                       0
<INVENTORY>                         15,103,179              15,103,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    15,858,108              15,858,108
<PP&E>                              13,202,704              13,202,704
<DEPRECIATION>                       7,017,205               7,017,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      25,435,795              25,435,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                5,626,173               5,626,173
<BONDS>                              8,355,105               8,355,105
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  0                       0
<COMMON>                               810,208                 810,208
<OTHER-SE>                                   0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        25,435,795              25,435,795
<SALES>                             13,213,052              24,200,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    13,213,052              24,200,533
<CGS>                                7,581,481              13,813,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        5,077,816              10,039,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     316,563                 640,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        237,192                (292,781)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    237,192                (292,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0                       0
<CHANGES>                                    0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           237,192                (292,781)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (0.10)                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (0.10)                  (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,396,939
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,080,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,122,085
<PP&E>                                      52,909,787
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,822,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,255,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,323,233
<BONDS>                                     31,211,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,367,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,255,820
<SALES>                                      2,474,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,585,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  549,571
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               881,852
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             655,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,153
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            130,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   130,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
256 La. 815

#### Paul G. CHARBONNET, Jr. v. Dr. and Mrs. Alton OCHSNER, Jr.

No. 50713.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1970.

In re: Dr. Alton Ochsner, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 236 So.2d 86.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### In the Matter of 1608 Madison Ave. Corp., Petitioner, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as State Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 19, 1953.

*645
      *Green & Ettinger*for petitioner.

*Robert H. Schaffer*and *Norman S. Fenton*for respondent.

Hofstadteb, J.

This is an application to annul a determination of the State Bent Administrator denying the petitioner’s protest against an order of the local rent administrator fixing the rent of a basement apartment in 1608 Madison Avenue at $15 a month. The only substantial question requiring discussion is whether the premises involved were decontrolled. If they were not, there was ample ground for reducing the rent from $30 to $15 a month, based on a physical inspection of the particular apartment and comparable housing accommodations. The order was issued pursuant to subdivision (c) of section 36 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, covering a case where no registration statement had been filed. The petitioner urges that the regulation is not applicable because the premises were converted into a living apartment in December, 1949, and rented as a housing accommodation for the first time on January 1, 1950. It is the petitioner’s claim that since the housing accommodations were created by conversion on or after February 1, 1947, they were not subject to control. This contention, however, overlooks the provisions of the Federal Housing and Bent Act of 1949 (U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 *et seq.)*and the regulations thereunder. By the 1949 amendment of paragraph (3) of subdivision (c) of section 202 of the 1947 Act (H. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix* § 1892, subd. [c], par. [3]), any housing accommodations resulting from any conversion created on or after the effective date of the Housing and Rent Act of 1949 (April 1, 1949) continue to be controlled housing accommodations unless the Housing Expediter issues an order decontrolling them. Under the regulations issued by the Housing Expediter (§ 825.1, subd. vi, par. [b], cl. [2]) the owner was required to file a petition for a decontrol order. The petitioner in this proceeding did not obtain an order decontrolling the apartment. It follows that the apartment was subject to rent control and since no registration had been effected either with the Federal or the State authorities the Administrator properly established a maximum rent for it in accordance with *646subdivision (c) of section 36 of the rent regulations. *(Paikoff*v. *McGoldrick,*N. Y. L. J., July 28, 1952, p. 153, col. 6, affd. 280 App. Div. 996.) It follows that the application must be denied, and the proceeding dismissed.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 1 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 2 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 3 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 4 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 5 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 6 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 7 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 8 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 9 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 10 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 11 of 12 * PUBLIC *; 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2021 | Document No. 603395 | PAGE Page 12 of 12 * PUBLIC *;
Exhibit 11.1

Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings Computation of Earnings Per Share

The
following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.

Earnings Per Share

Net Income / Weighted
average shares of common stock outstanding for the period



|                                    |  |                             |           |  |      |   |           | 
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- |  | ---- | - | --------- | 
|                                    |  | Three months
endedMarch 31, |          
|                                    |  | 2011                        |           |  | 2010 |  
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                             | 1,652,814 |  |      |   | 1,652,814 | 
|Net Income                          |  | $                           | 549,907   |  |      | $ | 460,651   | 
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                           | 0.33      |  |      | $ | 0.28      | 

No common stock equivalents exist.
#### FLETCHER CO., Petitioner, v. MELROE MANUFACTURING CO. et al., Respondents.

No. 40234.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 11, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 238 So.2d 142.

ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., and BOYD, J., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ALLFIRST
FINANCIAL INC. SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000036510
<NAME> ALLFIRST FINANCIAL INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         844,096
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,273
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               217,900
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 4,531
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,291,197
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     10,980,760
<ALLOWANCE>                                    157,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,180,703
<DEPOSITS>                                  12,539,621
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,726,578
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            853,839
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,195,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,526
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,395
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,772,952
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              18,190,703
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                641,811
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              191,948
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,396
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               838,155
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             305,543
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             465,391
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          372,764
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   23,077
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 146
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                386,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                211,375
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     211,375
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138,981
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.36
<LOANS-NON>                                     59,334
<LOANS-PAST>                                    40,141
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 95,166
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               157,351
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   30,819
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,742
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              157,351
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            90,136
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              7,011
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         60,204


</TABLE>
#### Michael T. MARSHALL, Jr., Appellant, v. CITY NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, a national banking corporation, as Trustee, and Hilton R. Carr, Jr., Guardian Ad Litem, Appellees.

No. 69-394.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.