alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.4
                             SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

                     PRIVATE OFFERING DATED JANUARY 3, 2000

This SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT when signed by Raven Moon, Inc. located at 2221
Springs Landing Blvd. Longwood, FL 32779 hereafter referred to as the
"PARTICIPANT" and RAVEN MOON INTERNATIONAL, INC. a public reporting Florida
corporation located at 120 International Parkway, Suite 220, Heathrow, Florida
32746 hereafter referred to as RMOO shall constitute a binding agreement.

THEREFORE FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION the parties agree as follows:

The PARTICIPANT desires to make a corporate loan in the form of cash to RMOO in
the amount of $85,000, so that RMOO can use the funds at ,its sole discretion as
stated in the Use of Proceeds for television pilot production, legal, SEC,
audit, accounting, Broker syndication, travel and entertainment, marketing,
consultants, accounts payable, and general operating administration costs or any
other expenses deemed necessary or appropriate by RMOO.

BOTH PARTIES AGREE THAT by the transfer of funds to RMOO and the execution of
this SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT, RMOO shall issue to the PARTICIPANT a 12 month
corporate note for $85,000 at 10% per annum interest, 85,000 Shares of Preferred
RMOO stock, 85,000 shares of common stock of RMOO and a Gross Revenue Royalty of
 .10625 for each $85,000 corporate loan made. REPAYMENT shall be paid on a pro
rata basis with other PARTICIPANTS until all loans have been repaid with
interest.

It is agreed that PARTICIPANT is an accredited investor who can bare the risk of
dosing part or all of his/her corporate loan made to RMOO. Furthermore the
PARTICIPANT acknowledges that he/she has sought the advise of either his/her
legal or financial advisor and is making this corporate loan of his/her own free
will and that this is a high risk venture and undertaking with no guarantee
whatsoever of success.

The PARTICIPANT shall have three (3) days from the date of this agreement to
rescind the agreement and ask for his/her funds to be returned, However, it is
understood a id agreed that after the three (3) day period, RMOO shall have the
right to use such R ads at it sole discretion as state above.

Both parties acknowledge that this is a full and complete agreement that cannot
be amended or change without written approval by both parties. .

Both parties agree that any dispute that may arise between them shall be settled
in arbitration in Seminole County, Florida according to the laws of Florida.

THIS AGREEMENT IS ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO ON THIS 6th DAY OF January 2000.

/s/  Joey DiFrancesco
-------------------------
     Joey DiFrancesco, CEO
     Raven Moon International, Inc.

/s/  Joey DiFrancesco
-------------------------------
     Joey DiFrancesco, President
     Participant Raven Moon, Inc.
#### Purvis HEBERT, and wife Wanda Jane Hebert v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION.

No. 61614.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1978.

In re: Purvis Hebert and wife Wanda Jane Hebert, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Vermilion. 355 So.2d 575.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>   This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
           from the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 1999. The
           Consolidated Income Statements, the Consolidated Statements of Cash
           Flows and the related notes for the year then ended, and is
           qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                 <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<CASH>                                                  9,193
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           5,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                             (209)
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       19,663
<PP&E>                                                  3,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                         (1,745)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         23,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   5,800
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                   41
<OTHER-SE>                                             17,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           23,178
<SALES>                                                17,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       22,178
<CGS>                                                     616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           3,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       19,812
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (217)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (76)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (141)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (141)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          ($0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          ($0.03)


</TABLE>
----

----

| 1. | The      Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:      April 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/Vlado P.      Hreljanovic                                                              |
|---------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |   | Vlado      P. Hreljanovic, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial      Officer  |
#### David Joseph CERNANCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-404.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 30, 1970.

*474Max P. Engel, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John Paul Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, David Joseph Cernance, appeals a judgment and sentence entered on his conviction by a jury of receiving stolen property.

The trial court in its judgment adjudicated appellant guilty of receiving stolen property. The judgment, however, failed to recite that appellant received the property with knowledge of its stolen character, or of circumstances that would put a reasonable person on inquiry as to its stolen character. Such a judgment fails to adjudicate appellant guilty of possession of stolen property under conditions which make such having, receiving and concealing a criminal offense. Mathis v. State, 1938, 134 Fla. 352, 184 So. 89; Perkins v. State, 1936, 126 Fla. 707, 171 So. 655; Biesendorfer v. State, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 322.

We have considered the remaining points raised on appeal by appellant, and determine them to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the sentence is vacated and set aside, and the cause remanded for entry of judgment consistent with the views herein expressed and imposition of sentence as the justice of the cause shall require.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20580

Office of the Secretary

 March 18, 2022

Re: Fashion Nova, LLC

FTC File No. 192-3138 

Dear Anonymous: 

Thank you for your comment regarding the above-referenced matter. Your letter was 

placed on the public record pursuant to Section 2.34 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 

C.F.R. § 2.34.

This proposed order settles charges that Fashion Nova withheld negative customer 

reviews from appearing on its website. The Commission, however, takes very seriously the 

concern you raise in your comment regarding fake reviews, another pervasive deceptive practice 

concerning customer reviews. While the Commission does not allege that Fashion Nova’s 

website contained fake reviews, the Commission remains committed to protecting consumers 

from all deceptive consumer review practices, including review suppression and fake reviews, 

and will continue to pursue law enforcement action where appropriate. Among other things, the 

Commission recently approved and began sending out a Notice of Penalty Offenses that 

empowers the Commission to seek civil penalties of up to $46,517 per violation against those 

who engage in certain deceptive endorsement practices, such as using fake reviews, after 

receiving it. 

After carefully considering your comment, the Commission has determined that the 

public interest is best served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without 

modification. A copy of the final Decision and Order, and other relevant materials, are available 

from the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov.

Thank you again for your comment. The Commission is aided in its analysis by hearing 

from a variety of sources, and we appreciate your interest in this matter. 

By direction of the Commission.

April J. Tabor

Secretary
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUST


FORM
10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2009


Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust (“the
Company”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
C. Staples, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
              /s/Thomas C. StaplesName:
              Thomas
      C. StaplesChief
      Financial Officer





November
9, 2009
**Exhibit32.1**

CertificationFurnished Pursuant to 

18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Financial Corporation (the"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2006 (the "Report"), theundersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 

-  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
-  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

|                       |  |                                                                                     |
|-----------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |  |
| By:    |  | David W. Mann                                                                       |
|                       |  | David W. Mann

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2007 |

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FirstFinancial Corporation and will be retained by First Financial Corporation. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
Technical Support Document

EPA

‐ R06

‐ OAR

‐ 2012

‐ 0098

Ozone Data for the Dallas/Fort Worth Area

To interpret the data for comparison with the national ambient air quality standards

(NAAQS) for ozone, we refer to 40 CFR 50 Appendix P. Appendix P provides general information

on calculating the 8

‐ hour ozone average, the ozone design value, and the ozone season. In

addition, Appendix P addresses data reporting and handling conventions; primary and

secondary standard

‐ related summary statistic; and comparisons with the primary and

secondary ozone standards.

In reviewing the data, we found that the TCEQ reported data during the ozone season

for all 19 ozone monitors in the DFW area. We noticed that from September 28 through the

first part of December 2014, ozone data was missing from the DFW monitor site #48

‐ 113

‐ 0075,

known as the Dallas North #2 monitor. 1 The State entered “null data codes” for the days with

missing data. Data was missing from this monitor because the monitoring site had been

vandalized. The time to secure, repair and get the monitor running included securing two

contractors and related permits for the work.

The ozone monitoring season (“ozone season”) for the DFW area runs from March 1

through October 31, which is 245 days. Consistent with 40 CFR 50, Appendix P at 2.3(b),

comparison with the primary NAAQS for ozone shall be based on three consecutive, complete

calendar years of air quality monitoring data. This requirement is met for the 3

‐ year period at a

monitoring site if daily maximum 8

‐ hour average concentrations are available for at least 90%

of the days within the ozone season, on average, for the 3

‐ year period, with a minimum data

completeness requirement in any one year of at least 75% of the days within the ozone season.

The design value for the area is calculated using data for ozone seasons 2012, 2013 and 2014.

During the 2014 ozone season, the Dallas North #2 monitor stopped working on September 28

and didn’t begin working again until early December. Since the months of November and

December are outside of the DFW ozone season, we do not consider them here. However, the

monitor missed the last three days of September and the entire month of October, so ran for

about (3 + 31 = 34; 245

– 34 = 211) 211 of 245 days, or about 86% of the ozone season.

Therefore, the monitor meets the data completeness requirement.

1 The Dallas North #2 monitor is located at 12532 1/2 Nuestra Drive and is maintained by the City of Dallas.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer****FurnishedPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the AnnualReport of Versant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedOctober 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, NICK ORDON, as Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.     The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company for the annual period coveredby the Report.

 
| /s/ Nick  Ordon                        |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| Nick Ordon                             |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| January 14,  2004                      |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to Versant Corporationand will be retained by Versant Corporation and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Leon STOLLER, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF DADE, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 72-706.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 14, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 10, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### Peter Gary GILBERT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 11, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joseph W. DeMember, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
P.1 

OAR Box 1796 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

49) VI-A-3 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37 PM Sheet 49 of 107 
P.2 

A-90-37 

VI-A-3 

This document has been moved to IV-D-328 at the request of the project 

officer. It was incorrectly categorized originally.
| Area Code/County              | Count |
|-------------------------------|-------|
| 802  Vermont                  | 5633  |
| Addison Vermont               | 501   |
| Bennington Vermont            | 796   |
| Caledonia Vermont             | 413   |
| Chittenden Vermont            | 2360  |
| Essex Vermont                 | 103   |
| Franklin Vermont              | 741   |
| Grand Isle Vermont            | 74    |
| Lamoille Vermont              | 216   |
| No Zip Code Reported, Vermont | 35    |
| Orange Vermont                | 305   |
| Orleans Vermont               | 205   |
| Rutland Vermont               | 722   |
| Washington Vermont            | 939   |
| Windham Vermont               | 913   |
| Windsor Vermont               | 940   |
#### CARLTON & McKINNEY and Continental Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Monroe Ronald LAND and the Industrial Relations Commission of the Florida Department of Commerce, Respondents.

No. 41099.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 28, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### GIBSON PRODUCTS OF DAYTONA BEACH, INC., Appellant, v. Robert E. LEHMANN and Verna M. Lehmann, his wife, Appellees.

No. 70-441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 19, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
TS

– 11KK 6F , Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, GPC Trace

Redacted
#### Arthur VALHOS, Appellant, v. Jeanne A. VALHOS, Appellee.

No. 73-692.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 17, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
---

EXHIBIT 99.4

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lourens A. van Vuuren, Chief Financial Officer of Great Basin Gold
Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    |                          
| | ------ | -------------------------
| |        |                          
| |        | /s/ Lourens A. Van Vuuren
| |        |                          
| | Name:  | Lourens A. van Vuuren    
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer  
| |        |                          
| | Date:  | March 30, 2012           

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



Date: November 4, 2005

                                         Michael T. Vesey
                                         ----------------
                                         Michael T. Vesey
                                         President and Chief Operating Officer