alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 12.

                      STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

                      BancWest Corporation and Subsidiaries
         Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                               MARCH 31,
                                                        ------------------------
                                                          2000            1999
                                                        --------        --------
                                                         (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                     <C>             <C>
Income before income taxes                              $ 84,802        $ 74,597
                                                        --------        --------
Fixed charges(1):
     Interest expense                                    122,115         108,293
     Rental expense                                        3,729           3,821
                                                        --------        --------
                                                         125,844         112,114
Less interest on deposits                                 99,498          87,873
                                                        --------        --------
     Net fixed charges                                    26,346          24,241
                                                        --------        --------
     Earnings, excluding
        interest on deposits                            $111,148        $ 98,838
                                                        ========        ========
     Earnings, including
        interest on deposits                            $210,646        $186,711
                                                        ========        ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

     Excluding interest on deposits                        4.22X           4.08x

     Including interest on deposits                        1.67X           1.67x
</TABLE>

----------

(1)  For purposes of computing the consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed
     charges, earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges.
     Fixed charges, excluding interest on deposits, include interest (other than
     on deposits), whether expensed or capitalized, and that portion of rental
     expense (generally one third) deemed representative of the interest factor.
     Fixed charges, including interest on deposits, consists of the foregoing
     items plus interest on deposits.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 31, 2019

NO. 03-18-00374-CV

Instill Corporation, Appellant

v.

Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of The State of Texas; and Ken Paxton, 

Attorney General of The State of Texas, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on March 9, 2018. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
May 5, 2010

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Brad Borror918-588-7582
   ONEOK Partners to Participate in National Association of
 Publicly Traded Partnerships Investor Conference
 
  TULSA, Okla. – May 5, 2010 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will present at the National Association of Publicly Traded Partnerships Investor Conference on Thursday, May 13, 2010, in Greenwich, Conn.
 John W. Gibson, ONEOK Partners chairman, president and chief executive officer, will present at the conference at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).
 The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on ONEOK Partners’ Web site www.oneokpartners.com.  A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days after the conference.
 
 The company will also post the presentation on its Web site that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).
 
 
 ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the partnership.  ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
 
 For more information, visit the Web site atwww.oneokpartners.com.  OKS-FV
 
 # # #
#### Ray Douglas CARPENTER, Appellant, v. Arlee BARRINER et al., Appellees.

No. 73-110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
CALL JOFFE FOR YOUR 

FrREE lllSIK ETE EXAM 

AN□ FOR MORE DETAILS! &@OOW £[?ml �B 

SOME RESTRICTIONS APPLY 

ELIMINATE THE HASSLE OF GLASSES AND CONTACTS NOW! 

See for yourself why Joffe is the Smart Choice for LASIK 

Custom technology to treat Personalized follow-up care You could get life changing Flexible financing plans and 

nearsightedness, farsightedness, and free enhancements, results without spending Best Price Guarantee to make LASIK 

and astigmatism. because we care. your life savings. more affordable than ever. 

Dr. Kenneth Smith 

Medical Director Save even more with your 

Vision Care or Flex Plan. ASK US HOWi • 

CALL 855·46· JOFFE 

OR VISIT WWW.JOFFE.COM 

OVER 16,000 PROCEDURES 4902 Shelbyville Road Louisville, KY 40207 

MEDl•CENTER

PERSONALLY PERFORMED 

LCAV0007924 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
 <CIK>                        0000865846
<NAME>                        VITAL SIGNS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                          2,600
<SECURITIES>                                    2,157
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,475
<ALLOWANCES>                                      638
<INVENTORY>                                    19,322
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               45,819
<PP&E>                                         52,394
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                138,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,240
<BONDS>                                         2,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       21,520
<OTHER-SE>                                     99,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  138,186
<SALES>                                       126,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              126,417
<CGS>                                          62,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  62,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                6,150
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                18,892
<INCOME-TAX>                                    5,757
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            13,135
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                       1,524
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .91
        


</TABLE>
261 La. 225

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Elbert FOX v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52273.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: Elbert Fox applying for writ of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Application denied. On the showing made applicant is not entitled to the relief sought.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion an evi-dentiary hearing should be held.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**PaineWebber
      R&D Partners III, L.P.**




CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of PaineWebber R&D Partners III, L.P. (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Stephen R. Dyer, President of PaineWebber Development Corp., General Partner
      of
      the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Partnership.





/s/
      STEPHEN R. DYER


Stephen
      R. Dyer


President
      (Principal Executive Officer)


of
      PaineWebber Development Corporation


March
      31,
      2006
#### Louis IORIO and Ruth G. lorio, his wife, Appellants, v. Obie Lawrence LAYMAN d/b/a Florida Trailer Sales and Service, and Coachman Industries, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 15, 1971.

Steve G. Morrow, Jr., of Morrow & Morrow, Miami, for appellants.

Vincent P. Collura, Orlando, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

A review of the recent cases discussing the criteria to be applied in determining the adequacy of a complaint compels us to the conclusion that the complaint was “at least adequate at this stage” to state a cause of action for breach of contract. See Keller v. Eagle Army-Navy Department Stores, Inc., Fourth District Court of Appeal, 256 So.2d 248, opinion filed November 19, 1971, citing the following cases: Cohn v. Florida-Georgia Television Company, Inc., Fla.App. *271969, 218 So.2d 787, and Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Walters, Fla.1971, 246 So. 2d 563. See also Pizzi v. Central Bank and Trust Company, Fla.1971, 250 So.2d 895.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. Nothing herein is intended to either restrict the trial court’s consideration of other motions or application of other rules of practice and procedure. The sole determination herein is the sufficiency of the complaint to state a cause of action.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 10688 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Aaron Christopher Taylor,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22

- CR

- 96

- 1

**______________ ________________**  Before **King, Haynes,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Aaron Christopher Taylor has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Taylor has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to all ow us to make a fair evaluation of

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 2, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10688 Document: 57-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2024No. 23

- 10688

2 Taylor ’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). His motion for appointment of new counsel is **DENIED** as untimely. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998)

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Taylor ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessme nt that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R**

. 42.2. Case: 23-10688 Document: 57-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2024
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 19127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07645]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA95) [44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(A)]. This program 
helps to ensure that requested data can be provided in the desired 
format, reporting burden (time and financial resources) is minimized, 
collection instruments are clearly understood, and the impact of 
collection requirements on respondents can be properly assessed. 
Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments concerning the proposed 
information collection on arts participation in the U.S. A copy of the 
current information collection request can be obtained by contacting 
the office listed below in the address section of this notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
address section below on or before June 1, 2014. The NEA is 
particularly interested in comments which:
     Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;
     Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information including the validity 
of the methodology and assumptions used;
     Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
     Minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate 
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting 
electronic submissions of responses.

ADDRESSES: Mail comments to: Sunil Iyengar, National Endowment for the 
Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 616, Washington, DC 20506-
0001, telephone (202) 682-5424 (this is not a toll-free number), fax 
(202) 682-5677 or send them via email to research@arts.gov.

    Dated: April 2, 2014.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations, National Endowment for the 
Arts.
[FR Doc. 2014-07645 Filed 4-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
```
#### YELL-FOR-PENNELL, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. JOAB, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-745.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

*439Marchant, Perkins, Cook & Caldwell, Miami, for appellant.

Goodman & Holtzman, Feibelman, Friedman, Hyman & Britton and Herbert Stet-tin, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order which held that the plaintiff, Yell-For-Pennell, Inc., had not complied with the provisions of the Florida Mechanics Lien Act and that the defendant, Joab, Inc., was not liable to the plaintiff. Final judgment was rendered for Joab, Inc. and plaintiff has appealed.

The notice to the owner herein must be held sufficient. See § 713.06(2), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; and Boux v. East Hillsborough Apartments, Inc., Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 202.

The claim of lien was substantially in the form prescribed by the act and there was no showing that the landowner was prejudiced by the form of the claim. See § 713.08(3) and (4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; George J. Motz Construction Corp. v. Coral Pines, Inc., Fla.App. 1970, 232 So.2d 441; and Russell v. Farrey’s Wholesale Hardware Co., Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 513.

Accordingly, the final judgment for defendant is reversed and the cause is remanded for further action consistent herewith.

It is so ordered.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-268

_____________________________

DWAYNE D. HAGANS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Waddell A. Wallace, Judge.

May 17, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and ROWE and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Dwayne D. Hagans, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### In re Stephen BERRY.

No. 54625.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 4, 1974.

In re: Stephen Berry applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus.

Writ granted. See Order.

CALOGERO, J.,

dissents. The Court of Appeal was correct in refusing to grant relator relief because he has not availed himself of the subpoena powers and procedural remedies available to him in the criminal proceedings pending against him. Were I to consider the matter properly before us I would agree with the majority that the statutory privilege (R.S. 13:1586) is inapplicable to this case under its particular facts and circumstances.

The Juvenile Court is ordered to permit counsel for relator to examine and copy, under that court’s supervision, any and all parts of the juvenile record of the relator. The statutory privilege (R.S. 13:1586) is inapplicable to this case under its particular facts and circumstances. See Davis v. Alaska, 1974, -U.S. -, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 39 L.Ed.2d 347.
No. 00-517.

#### Risby *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certio-rari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,721
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          18,484
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        907
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          80,285
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            81,123
<LOANS>                                        255,345
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,948
<DEPOSITS>                                     320,769
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,091
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,233
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 372,948
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 21,576
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,163
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,163
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,902
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              13,418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,025
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,877
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,428
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 254
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,846
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,239
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,330
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,330
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.21
<LOANS-NON>                                        981
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,364
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      917
<RECOVERIES>                                       134
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,009
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,009
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the matter of the Estate of * From the County C ourt at

Mary Fra ncine Wren Burkhaulter, Law No. 2 of Ector County,

deceased, Trial Court No. 20,508

- 11

.

No. 11

- 14

- 00162

- CV * August 21 , 2014

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has considered Travis Burkhaulter ’s and Kathy Wren’s agreed

motion to dismiss the appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted.

Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The

costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.