alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Thomas Staples, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
November 12, 2004

| | /s/THOMAS STAPLESThomas Staples
Chief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form  S-8  No.  333-71374,   333-66993,  333-92525,  333-39065,  333-50292  and
333-50296) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Plan, 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
1993 Stock Plan, 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan
of Adept  Technology,  Inc. of our report dated August 4, 2003,  with respect to
the consolidated  financial  statements and schedule of Adept  Technology,  Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2003 .

                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
September 29, 2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE J.R. ESPINOZA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

D. DIAZ, Correctional Counselor I at 

California City Correctional Facility; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 17-17002 

D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00338-SAB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Stanley Albert Boone, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Jose J.R. Espinoza appeals pro se from the 

magistrate judge’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging 

constitutional claims arising from information in Espinoza’s classification file. We 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-17002 

magistrate judge validly entered judgment on behalf of the district court. Allen v. 

Meyer, 755 F.3d 866, 867-68 (9th Cir. 2014). We vacate and remand.

Espinoza consented to proceed before the magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c). The magistrate judge then screened and dismissed Espinoza’s action 

before the named defendants had been served. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A, 

1915(e)(2)(B). Because all parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to 

proceed before the magistrate judge for jurisdiction to vest, Williams v. King, 875 

F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017), we vacate the magistrate judge’s order and 

remand for further proceedings. 

VACATED and REMANDED.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                               March 1, 2012

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 5.02    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of
	     Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory
             Arrangements of Certain Officers.Other Events
----------   --------------------------------------------

On February 24, 2012 Director Lawrence Baumgartner notified the Board of
Directors of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the "Company") that he will
not stand for re-election to the Board when his term expires at the Company's
2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, scheduled for April 25, 2012.
Mr. Baumgartner is a member of the Audit Committee, Chairman of the Nomination
and Governance Committee and has been a director since 2008. Mr. Baumgartner's
decision not to stand for reelection was not because of any disagreement with
the Company on any matter relating to the Company's operations, policies or
practices.


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------


     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: March 1, 2012	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUST


FORM
10-Q JUNE 30, 2010





Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust (“the
Company”) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael L. Ashner,
Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
                /s/ Michael L. AshnerName:
                Michael
      L. AshnerChief
      Executive Officer





August
9, 2010
Exhibit 99.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350



The
undersigned, Nelson C. Rising, the Chief Executive Officer, of Catellus Development Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



(i)    the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending December
31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 11, 2003



/S/    NELSON C. RISINGNelson C. Rising




THIS
CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED SOLELY PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS PART OF THE REPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
APPENDIX 4:

GRACO RETAINED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

“Graco Retained Intellectual Property” means (i) Category 1: the Retained Ransburg Powder 

Finishing Intellectual Property, which is specifically identified and described on Appendix 3, 

Exhibit 3 to this Order, and (ii) Category 2: Intellectual Property included as an asset of the

Gema Powder Finishing Business for which a license to the Commission-approved Acquirer is 

necessary to assure the continued and unimpeded operations of the Liquid Finishing Business 

and the LFB Powder Finishing Business after the Divestiture Date. 

The Graco Retained Intellectual Property that must be licensed to the Commission-approved 

Acquirer pursuant to a Graco License is specifically identified and described on this Appendix 4

to this Order, as further specified below. 

CATEGORY 1:

1. U.S. Patent No. 7,478,763, entitled “Spray Coating Device for Spraying Coating 

Material, in Particular Coating Powder,” as well as any and all continuations, divisionals, 

continuations-in-part, reissues, reexaminations, and foreign counterparts thereof.

2. Drawing package for RPAA-01.

CATEGORY 2:

1. U.S. Patent No. 6,557,789, entitled “Manual Spray Coating Gun,” as well as any and all 

continuations, divisionals, continuations-in-part, reissues, reexaminations, and foreign 

counterparts thereof.

2. U.S. Patent No. 6,562,138, entitled “Electrode Holder for a Powder Spray Gun,” as well 

as any and all continuations, divisionals, continuations-in-part, reissues, reexaminations, 

and foreign counterparts thereof.

3. U.S. Patent No. 6,712,291, entitled “Spray Coating Apparatus,” as well as any and all 

continuations, divisionals, continuations-in-part, reissues, reexaminations, and foreign 

counterparts thereof.

4. U.S. Patent No. 6,935,583, entitled “Coating-Powder Spray Gun,” as well as any and all 

continuations, divisionals, continuations-in-part, reissues, reexaminations, and foreign 

counterparts thereof.
5. U.S. Patent No. 5,686,149, entitled “Spray Device and Method for Powder Coating 

Material,” as well as any and all continuations, divisionals, continuations-in-part, 

reissues, reexaminations, and foreign counterparts thereof.

6. U.S. Patent No. 5,735,958, entitled “Electrostatic Coating System,” as well as any and all 

continuations, divisionals, continuations-in-part, reissues, reexaminations, and foreign 

counterparts thereof.

7. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0197078, entitled “Spray Coating Device,” 

as well as any and all continuations, divisionals, continuations-in-part, reissues, 

reexaminations, and foreign counterparts thereof.
260 La. 111

#### Milford R. RAYBORN, Sr., et al. v. John D. SMILEY, d/b/a Modern Rendering Co., et al.

No. 51956.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 7, 1971.

In re: Leona Stafford et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 253 So.2d 664.

Writ denied. Under the statement of fact by the Court of Appeal we cannot say the result is incorrect.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.1b

Site Lease, dated as of May 8, 2001, between Dynegy Danskammer, L.L.C. and
Danskammer OL LLC.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 28, 2011

y1219 

# Order

December 28, 2011

143566

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143566 COA: 299265 DONALD STEWART, Wayne CC: 04-005837 Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 25, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0477

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TAMMY JANE SMITH,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including January 18, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

December 17 2020

12/17/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0477
<PAGE>

                          UNITED STATES
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549


                            FORM 8-K
                         CURRENT REPORT
             Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                 Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                         October 3, 1996
        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                       VANSTAR CORPORATION
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Delaware               1-14192          94-2376431
(State or other jurisdiction  (Commission      (IRS Employer
     of Incorporation)        File Number)   Identification No.)


         5964 W. Las Positas Blvd.
          Pleasanton, California                    94588
(Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)


                         (510) 734-4000
      (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


                               N/A
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Item 5.   Other Events.

     As permitted under Rule 135c promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Vanstar Corporation (the
"Registrant") is filing as an exhibit to this Current Report on
Form 8-K a press release issued by the Registrant on October 3,
1996.

<PAGE>

Item 7.   Financial Statements and Exhibits.

     (c)  Exhibits.

          Exhibit No.              Document
          -----------         ------------------------------
             99.1             Press release issued by the
                              Registrant on October 3, 1996
                              (filed herewith)


                            SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly 
authorized.

                              VANSTAR CORPORATION
                              

DATE:  October 3, 1996        BY:  /s/ H. Christopher Covington
                                   -----------------------------
                                   H. Christopher Covington
                                   Senior Vice President          
                     


<PAGE>

                          EXHIBIT INDEX

Doc. No.       Document Description

99.1           Press release issued by the Registrant on 
               October 3, 1996 (filed herewith)
#### C. L. BROOKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-257.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 28, 1971.

Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender and Gerald Sohn, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Thomas B. Calhoun, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747; McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90 S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763; and Parker v. North Carolina, 397 U.S. 790, 90 S.Ct. 1458, 1474, 25 L.Ed.2d 785, all of which cases were decided by the United States Supreme Court on May 4, 1970, upholding the validity of guilty pleas entered in open court by the respective defendants.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                                                       Form of Share Certificate


                             Incorporated in Bermuda

                                  BUNGE LIMITED


This is to certify that



is/are the registered shareholders of:

<TABLE>
<S>                   <C>                               <C>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    No. of Shares         Type of Share                        Par Value


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Date of Record        Certificate Number                    % Paid


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


 The above shares are subject to the Memorandum of Association and Bye-Laws of
          the Company and transferrable in accordance with therewith.


                                   Given under the Common Seal of the Company


_________________________ Director ___________________________Director/Secretary
#### Levi CALHOUN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. JJ-75.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 29, 1978.

Levi Calhoun, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment and sentence after a conviction of attempted robbery and in the course of committing the robbery carrying a firearm. The trial judge denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing. The order issued by the court asserted that the records and files refuted the claims of the defendant, but no portion of the record or file was attached to the order.

Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P. requires that when the denial of a motion for post conviction relief is not based on the legal insufficiency of the motion, “a copy of that portion of the files and records which conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief shall be attached to the [order]” or an evidentiary hearing should be granted. Accordingly, this case is reversed and remanded with instructions for the trial court to attach that portion of the case file and record which refutes appellant’s allegations or to conduct an evidentiary hearing.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MILLS, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 

Statement from FTC Chairman Joe Simons Regarding Consumer Protection 

March 26, 2020 

Federal Trade Commission staff in the Bureau of Consumer Protection remain hard at work 

protecting consumers from deceptive and unfair commercial practices. Despite the difficult 

circumstances, the FTC’s law enforcement, policy, and investigative work continues, and our 

dedicated professional staff are fully engaged in our mission to protect consumers. 

We are working closely with federal and state law enforcers, and with other stakeholders, 

including consumer advocates and the business community, and are devoting significant 

resources to tackling scammers and unfair and deceptive business practices. We will not tolerate 

businesses seeking to take advantage of consumers’ concerns and fears regarding coronavirus 

disease, exigent circumstances, or financial distress. Information to educate consumers about 

emerging coronavirus scams, and what each of us can do, is available at ftc.gov/coronavirus. We 

encourage you to share these educational materials broadly to help protect those you love from 

scams. You can also help us by reporting such scams at ftc.gov/complaint. Reporting these 

scams to the FTC not only informs us, but also can help to protect your family, friends, and 

community. 

In this time of national emergency with the pandemic putting enormous strain on all sectors of 

commerce, we are all doing our part. We recognize enormous challenges for consumers, as well 

as for businesses trying to get goods and services to people across the country. Over the next few 

weeks, the FTC will remain flexible and reasonable in enforcing compliance requirements that 

may hinder the provision of important goods and services to consumers. To be clear, by being 

flexible and reasonable, I am not suggesting that we will tolerate companies deceiving 

consumers, using tactics that violate well-established consumer protections, or taking unfair 

advantage of these uniquely challenging times. At all times, good faith efforts undertaken to 

provide needed goods and services to consumers will be taken into account in making 

enforcement decisions. The FTC is ready to assist businesses that may seek guidance about 

compliance obligations on consumer protection issues during this unprecedented time. If you 

seek guidance for your business, please email Business.covid@ftc.gov and FTC staff will 

respond to your inquiries as quickly as possible.