alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

The Board of Directors
Ecometry Corporation
(formerly Smith-Gardner & Associates, Inc.):

We consent to incorporation by reference into previously filed registration
statements on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-71669 and 333-49470) filed by
Ecometry Corporation of our report dated January 25, 2002, except as to Note 12,
which is as of February 15, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Ecometry Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable preferred stock,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the Company's 2001 Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Miami, Florida
March 7, 2002
Message Design Factors and 

Advertising Disclosures*

Craig Andrews

Marquette University

May 2001

*Many factors affect the processing of disclosures. By the way, this is 8-point font size!
Disclosure Modality

• Dual modality disclosures (audio and video) 

are better recalled than single modality 

disclosures (especially video only).

• Audio-only disclosures are better recalled 

than video-only disclosures.

• In practice, almost all television disclosures 

are video-only.
Disclosure Size, etc.

• Improving disclosure conspicuity (size and 

contrast) can increase message recall.

• “Modem Required. Sold Separately.” – 4pt. font

• Shorter disclosures are comprehended better 

than longer disclosures.

• Disclosures that have fewer characters per 

inch, occupy a larger area, and are more 

isolated are more noticeable than 

disclosures without these features.
Disclosure Distraction 

• Background noise and ad clutter tend to 

reduce the awareness of disclosures.

• Distinctive “peripheral cues” (color, 

celebrities, music, scenery,...) can interfere 

with viewers’ processing of message 

disclosures – especially if the cue is 

unrelated to the message disclosure.

• Listerine corrective ad disclosure
Disclosure Specificity and 

Length

• General advisories and claims (e.g., “read 

the label,” “consult your doctor”) tend not 

to be comprehended as well as more 

specific information.

• However, disclosure length should not be 

favored in increasing specificity. Again, 

shorter disclosures are recalled better than 

longer disclosures.
Disclosure Understanding

• Target market viewers may have difficulty 

understanding disclosures at times. Their 

ability levels (age, education, special 

product knowledge) in processing the 

disclosures should be considered.

• Children and disclosures (“Some assembly 

required” vs. “You have to put this 

together”)
'\\\ FindFamilyResources ~,, Your: Premier lndeperldel'lt Resource Olfenng Guides, 

f//' Tutanals and lnformalJOn on Available As515tance Programs 

Learn More About Food Stamps in 

First Name last Name 

Emall Address Phone Numcer 

D-D-1~ ~ 

t declare that I am a U.S resident over the age of 18 and agree to this site's terms. 

~• Yes _ No 

By checking "yes·, t consent to receive emails from findfamilyresources.com and understand I will receive 

informative newsletters which may contain special offers from our select partners. I also consent to be contacted 

regarding educational and other opportunities at the phone number prollided, including mobile number. using an 

automated telephone dialing system. I may be contacted by online-edu-help.com or 1 of the following llil!!!J.m 

regardless of being on a federal or state do not call list This is a separate optional offer for education. Consent is 

not required as a condition of using this selVice 

[ Click Here To Continue ) 

On the following pages vou will fin!! orogram requirement guidelines relevant offers and apollcabon 

Information. FindFamll\lResources.com Is not affiliated with authorized. or endorsed bv me United States 

govemmenl Flnc!Famfl','Resources.com In no way guarantees the success of any appllcabon for U.S. government 

benefits and monetary assJstance of any ldnd. 

By dlddng "Clldc Here To Continue· you agree to the FlndFamllyResources.com Terms of Service and Privacy 

Polley. You also agree to receive regular email updates regarding the benel\Ls and assistance programs avallable 

lo you. You mayunsubscnbe from these email updates at anytime.
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





I,
Hongkeung Lam, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Forlink Software Corporation,
Inc.;





2.      Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.      Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.      The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.      The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  March
      26, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Hongkeung LamHongkeung
      LamChief
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 3, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00266

- CV

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Appellant

v.

Express Limousines, Inc. n/k/a Groovy Automotive I, Inc.;

and Charles Delmonico , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM TH E 353 RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order granting appellees ’ motion summary judgment and denying

appellant ’ s motion for summary judgment signed by the tr i a l court on May 12, 202 1

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the order

. Therefore, the C ourt affirm s the trial court ’ s order

. A ppellant shall pay all costs

relating to this appeal, both in th is Court and in the court below.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Union Real Estate Equity and
Mortgage Investments (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2005                                  /s/  Michael L. Ashner
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Michael L. Ashner
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 14, 2005                                  /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Thomas Staples
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     95,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         67,870
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,289
<SALES>                                         45,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,833
<CGS>                                           39,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   185
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    543
<INCOME-TAX>                                       206
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
          FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 2000, THE
          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED
          STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AND THE RELATED NOTES FOR THE NINE
          MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
          BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,708
<PP&E>                                           1,637
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,881
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,681
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,881
<SALES>                                          3,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,613
<CGS>                                               83
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      828
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,139)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,139)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.24)



</TABLE>
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAVV JUDGES

In the Matter of

California Naturel, Inc.,

a corporation, DOCKET NO. 9370

Respondent.

ORDER ON DEADLINE TO FILE ANSWER

The Complaint in this case was issued on April 11,2016 and properly served on

Respondent. Pursuant to Federal Trade Commission ("FTC")Rule 3.12(a), as explained to

Respondent by an April 26, 2016 email from the Office ofthe Secretary to Mr. John B. Duler,

President, Californial Naturel, Respondent's Answer was due on or before May 9, 2016.

On May 6, 2016, Mr. Duler filed a Notice of Appearance, designating himself as

counsel or representative of Respondent, and a response to the Complaint. By email dated May

9, 2016, the Office ofthe Secretary informed Mr. Duler that his May 6, 2016 response to the

Complaint was deficient in the several ways listed in the May 9, 2016 email and instructed Mr.

Duler to file a revised response as soon as feasible. By email dated May 13, 2016, the Office of

the Secretary, pursuant to FTC Rule 4.2, extended Respondent's time for filing his Answer to

May 27, 2016.

An Order was issued on May 13, 2016, confirming the May 27, 2016 deadline for

Respondent to file an Answer to the Complaint. Respondent failed to file an Answer by May

27, 2016. On June I, 2016, the parties were directed to file a status report.

On June 3, 2016, FTC Complaint Counsel filed its Initial Status Report. In the Initial

Status Report, Complaint Counsel represents that the parties have conducted settlement

discussions and have reached a tentative agreement on settlement terms. Complaint Counsel

states that the parties plan to file a joint motion to withdraw the matter from adjudication as

soon as the motion and consent agreement are finalized.

06 03 2016

582870
Based on these representations by Complaint Counsel, good cause exists to further

extend, for an additional 30 days, the deadline for Respondent to file his Answer. Accordingly,

no later than July 5, 2016, Respondent shall file his Answer or the parties shall file a joint

motion to withdraw the matter from adjudication for the purpose of considering a proposed

settlement.

ORDERED:

D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Date: June 3,2016
Notice of Electronic Service

I hereby certify that on June 03, 2016, I filed an electronic copy of the foregoing Order on Deadling to File

Answer, with:

D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Suite 110

Washington, DC, 20580

Donald Clark

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Suite 172

Washington, DC, 20580

I hereby certify that on June 03, 2016, I served via E-Service an electronic copy of the foregoing Order on

Deadling to File Answer, upon:

Robert Frisby

Attorney

Federal Trade Commission

rfrisby@ftc.gov

Complaint

John Singer

Attorney

Federal Trade Commission

jsinger@ftc.gov

Complaint

I hereby certify that on June 03, 2016, I served via other means, as provided in 4.4(b) of the foregoing Order on

Deadling to File Answer, upon:

john bernard duler

president

california natural

jbduler@californianaturel.com

Respondent

Lynnette Pelzer

Attorney
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 75150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30477]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Appointments to Performance Review Board for Senior Executive 
Service

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Appointment of Performance Review Board for Senior Executive 
Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee For Purchase from People Who Are Blind Or 
Severely Disabled (Committee) has announced the following appointments 
to the Committee Performance Review Board.
    The following individuals are appointed as members of the Committee 
Performance Review Board responsible for making recommendations to the 
appointing and awarding authorities on performance appraisal ratings 
and performance awards for Senior Executive Service employees:

Perry E. Anthony, Ph.D., Deputy Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services 
Administration, Department of Education.
James M. Kesteloot, Private Citizen.
J. Paul M. Laird, Regional Director, North Central Region, Federal 
Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice.

    All appointments are made pursuant to Section 4314 of Chapter 43 of 
Title 5 of the United States Code.

DATES: Effective Date: December 20, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Briscoe, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email CMTEFedReg@abilityone.gov.

Patricia Briscoe,
Deputy Director, Business Operations (Pricing and Information 
Management).
[FR Doc. 2012-30477 Filed 12-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1



SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS, INC.



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, O. Bruton
Smith, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      |  |  |  | 
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 
|Date: March 14, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ O. Bruton Smith                 
|                     |  |     |  | O. Bruton Smith                     
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to, and will be retained by, Speedway Motorsports, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.