alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Stephen A. Sherwin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Cell Genesys, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Cell
Genesys, Inc. Dated: March 14, 2005 By:

/s/Stephen  A. Sherwin,
M.D.Name:
    Stephen A. Sherwin, M.D.Title:
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer I, Matthew J. Pfeffer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Cell Genesys, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Cell Genesys, Inc. Dated: March 14, 2005 By:

/s/Matthew J. PfefferName:
    Matthew J. PfefferTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First West
Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001 and 2000, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the three and nine-month periods then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical and procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated January 23, 2001, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S.R. Snodgrass A.C.



Wheeling, West Virginia
November 9, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           21,103
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          29,995
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            30,807
<EQUITIES>                                     31,715
<MORTGAGE>                                        320
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   1,645
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 89,351
<CASH>                                            364
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              8,489
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          4,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                106,958
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                18,667
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             8,853
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 22,246
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           1,729
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        2,340
<OTHER-SE>                                     44,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  106,958
<PREMIUMS>                                     31,156
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             4,204
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              2,720
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    695
<BENEFITS>                                     22,995
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     5,822
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            6,598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                      362
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,998
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,998
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.28
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0 
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0
        


</TABLE>
JAMES R. GUTHRIE

PRESIDENT, NARC

“Lawyers are ones who write a 10,000 word document and call it a brief.”

...Franz Kafka

NARC

CARU

NARB

NAD

JAMES R. GUTHRIE

PRESIDENT, NARC

“Know the Consumer”

LOYALTY

TRUST

TRUTH/ACCURACY

CRM

TRUSTMARK

NAD

CARU

ADVERTISING

LOYALTY

TRUST

TRUTH/ACCURACY

Dog for sale:  Eats anything and is fond of children. 

NAD
Order filed, April 22, 2019.

 In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01-19-00285-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K. M., JR. A CHILD, Appellant

V.

DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case 2017-04805J

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due 04/19/2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has

not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we

issue the following order.

We order, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal,

if any, within 10 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

FILE COPY
#### UVESCO, INCORPORATED, et al., Appellants, v. Howard C. PETERSEN et al., Appellees.

No. 73-143.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 5, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jerome E. Ball, ChiefExecutive Officer for Forward Industries, Inc. certify that:

1.                   I have reviewed thequarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Forward Industries, Inc.;

2.                   Based on my knowledge,this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.                   Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

Dated: January 21, 2003

| /s/ JEROME E.BALLJerome E. Ball      Chief Executive Officer      Principal Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8049 

To require the Corps of Engineers to prohibit certain discharges of water 

at Lake Okeechobee, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 14, 2020 

Mr. MAST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Corps of Engineers to prohibit certain discharges of water at Lake Okeechobee, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Poisoning Florida 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LAKE OKEECHOBEE DISCHARGE PROHIBITION. 

7 The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief 

8 of Engineers, shall prohibit discharges of water through 

9 the S–308 and S–80 lock and dam structures at Lake 

10 Okeechobee when the water exceeds the maximum conVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:26 Sep 02, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8049.IH H8049

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8049 IH

1 centration of microcystins recommended for recreational 

2 waters by the Environmental Protection Agency, as de3 scribed in the notice titled ‘‘Recommended Human Health 

4 Recreational Ambient Water Quality Criteria or Swim5 ming Advisories for Microcystins and 

6 Cylindrospermopsin’’ (84 Fed. Reg. 26413) (or any suc7 cessor water quality criteria), based on tests conducted by 

8 the Secretary, another Federal agency, or the State of 

9 Florida. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORT 
HOWARD CORPORATION'S UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR 
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000038195
<NAME> FORT HOWARD CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1
<CASH>                                            693
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  93,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,304
<INVENTORY>                                   136,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              278,946
<PP&E>                                      2,009,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                778,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,587,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         311,200
<BONDS>                                     2,500,695
<COMMON>                                          740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,530,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,587,702
<SALES>                                     1,196,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,196,307
<CGS>                                         715,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 715,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            198,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               171,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                   65,386
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           106,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,340)
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  103,051
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.50
        











 





</TABLE>
June 1, 2015

Mr. Samuel Rodriguez

114B Naubuc Avenue Glastonbury, CT 16033

Dear Mr. Rodriguez:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 30, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1362), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Order entered January 2 7 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 01410
- CV
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF JUIA L. VARGO AND ROBERT T. O'DONNELL On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 50667
- 2013 

### O RDER Both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case are overdue. By letters dated November 25, 2013, we notified appellant the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record had not been filed because app ellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the records. By letters dated December 4, 2013 and December 5, 2013, appellant responded that arrangements had been made to pay for the records.
T herefore, we ORDER Collin County District Clerk to fil e the clerk’s record within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order. We notify appellant that if we receive verification appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, we will, without further notice, dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b). We also ORDER Court Reporter to file the reporter’s record within TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order. We notify appellant that if we receive verification appellant has not paidfor or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the following persons:
Andrea Stroh Thompson Collin County District Clerk
Ka rla Kimbrell Official Court Reporter, 380th Judicial District Court

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
i i i i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPI NIO N No. 04-10-00622- CV Ricardo J. REYNA , I ndividually and d/b/a Ricar do J . Rey na U.S. Mail Service , An Assumed Name, and Ruben G arc ia J r.,

Appellants

v. Sandra G

. GA RCIA , Appellee Fr om the 381st J udicial District Court, Starr County , Texas

Trial Court No. DC-09- 211 Honora ble J ose L

uis Garza, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Kar en Ang elini, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: September 29, 2010 J OI NT MOTI ON TO D I SMI SS GR ANTED, A PPEAL DI SMI SSED The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appea l. W e gra n t t h e motion. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 42.1(a) (2). We order all costs assessed ag ainst appellant. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 4 2

. 1 (d) (abse nt ag ree ment of the pa rties, costs ar e taxed ag ainst appellant). PER C URI AM
#### SOUTHERN-AIRE COATS OF FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, and Louis Dworkin, Appellants, v. Henoch MENDELSUND, as Treasurer of Joint Board of Cloak, Suit, Skirt and Reefer Makers Union, an unincorporated association, Appellee.

No. 68-845.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 12, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                       5,662,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,658,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   468,000
<INVENTORY>                                         0,
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,269,000
<PP&E>                                       3,240,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,611,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,638,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,469,000
<BONDS>                                         80,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,948,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,638,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,517,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,718,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                99,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,785,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,783,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,783,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**
```

```
**CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
```

 Douglas W. Sabra, Chief Executive Officer of ForwardIndustries, Inc. (”Forward”), and James O. McKenna, Chief Financial Officer, doeach certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 that, to the best of their knowledge:
    -  Forward’sQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2010 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
    -  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Forward.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of August 2010. 

 

| /s/ Douglas W. Sabra                         |
|----------------------------------------------|
| Douglas W. Sabra                             |
| Chief Executive Officer                      |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|                                         |
|                                         |
| /s/ James O. McKenna                         |
| James O. McKenna                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                      |
| (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair

Noah Joshua Phillips

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter

Christine S. Wilson

Alvaro M. Bedoya

DOCKET NO. 9408

ORDER SCHEDULING ORAL ARGUMENT AND EXTENDING 

DEADLINE FOR COMMISSION RULING 

On August 22, 2022, Complaint Counsel filed a Motion for Summary Decision

(“Motion”). Respondent Intuit, Inc., has filed an Opposition, and Complaint Counsel have 

submitted a Reply. Respondent’s Opposition requests oral argument regarding the Motion, and 

we believe that entertaining oral argument would be beneficial. 

The Commission has determined to conduct the oral argument on October 31, 2022, at 

1:00 p.m. EDT. The argument will be conducted virtually, by video conferencing. Public access 

to the argument, to the extent consistent with the protection of confidential information and for

monitoring purposes only, will be provided via telephone or live web streaming.

Each side will be allotted 45 minutes to present its argument. Complaint Counsel will

have the opportunity to open the argument and may reserve time for rebuttal. If either party

wishes to provide the Commission with a short written or electronic compilation of material to

facilitate its presentation during the oral argument, any such compilation may contain only public

information that is already in the summary decision record, and copies must be filed with the

Secretary of the Commission and provided to opposing Counsel no later than October 24, 2022, 

at 5:00 pm EDT.

The Commission’s deadline for ruling upon the Motion, currently October 24, 2022, will 

be extended to December 30, 2022 to facilitate full consideration following oral argument of the

issues presented. Accordingly, 

In the Matter of

Intuit, Inc.,

 a corporation.
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Commission will conduct oral argument 

regarding Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Summary Decision on October 31, 2022, as 

specified above; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Commission’s deadline for ruling on 

Complaint Counsel’s Motion for Summary Decision is extended to December 30, 2022. 

By the Commission.

April J. Tabor

Secretary

SEAL: 

ISSUED: October 7, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            By:    /s/ James T. Barry
                                                   --------------------
                                                   James T. Barry
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   September 15, 2008

                                    Page 27