alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ESTES, INC., d/b/a Goody Shoes, Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO., Appellee.

No. 70-284.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 30, 1970.

*475Joel Miller, of Miller & Mueller, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Thomas B. Mimms, Jr., of Fleming O’Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

LEE, THOMAS E., Associate Judge.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, appeals from a final judgment entered in favor of the defendant upon a directed verdict for the defendant, by reason that, the plaintiff, having rested, had not adduced any evidence whatsoever to show the defendant to be guilty of negligence in the premises, and, that the evidence failed to make out a prima facie case, under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, so as to cast the burden upon the defendant to disprove its liability for the break-down and failure of an electric motor which had been in operation for more than five years driving plaintiff’s air conditioning compressor. We affirm.

The electric motor in question had been repaired several times during its more than five years of operation, and there was no evidence presented from which it might be concluded that it burned out, overheated, or was affected adversely in any respect by the cessation or resumption of the flow of electric current, or due to the variation, or surges, in voltage being supplied by defendant power company.

The record shows that there was no evidence presented from which a jury could conclude that the defendant was guilty of any specific act of negligence. The plaintiff failed to adduce evidence to show, or even tend to show, that the electric motor would not have burned out except by reason of negligence of the defendant.

Therefore, as the record shows no evidence to support a finding of negligence; and, as there is no evidence to support a presumption that the motor could not have failed except for negligence of the defendant, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur would not apply, no error of the trial judge has been demonstrated and the judgment below will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED, J„ concur.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 11:15 AM

To: 'amarino@nutrinetcorp.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA); C ooper, Thuy (FAA); Ferritto, Michelle (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n: Low Country RC, Corporation



### January 7, 2015

Mr. Anthony J. Marino

President Low Country RC, Corporation

3104 River Drive Thunderbolt, GA 31404

Dear Mr. Marino:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0803). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headqua rters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov

.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the prop osed UAS operation. The description should include

the size.

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency sp ectrum. This information can be located in the

aircraft manual.

 Describe the process used to document UAS discrepanc ies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft record. Examples of processes incl ude (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and ensure that only airworthy and safe UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations.

 Your petition references an flight operations manual, however it was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the aircraft.

Please provide the additional information by January 21, 2015.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,2 

### Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert L. BROWN.

No. 60913.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 19, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

Dean A. Sutherland and Robert J. Bar-bier, Terriberry, Carroll, Yancey & Farrell, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Donald T. Giglio, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee. ■

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Treating defendant’s letter as a petition for habeas corpus, the petition is denied on the basis of the evidence adduced at the evidentiary hearing in the trial court.
EXHIBIT 10.52

                                                                        10-28-98

To:  Bob Klose

Subject:  Employment Opportunity

Dear Bob,

     ADC offers you the position of Chief Operating Officer at ADC commencing on
November 9, 1998 or a date to be defined as close to this as practicable to
terminating your current position.

     You will be responsible for all production operations, plant and facilities
maintenance, product and process quality control, and implementation of tasks
outlined on the attached sheet.

     Compensation will be a base of $6,500 per month ($78,000 annual) with a
bonus package to reach an annual basis of $100,000 over the first 12 months of
employment upon completion of the designated tasks outlined on the attached
sheets.  Bonuses will be paid when appropriate tasks have been completed.

     You will receive a 250,000 share stock option @ $1.00 per share, vesting
over 5 years at 20% per year.

     Vacation time will accrue as earned and you will be able to schedule
vacations during 1999 to accomodate your personal plans as long as the schedule
fits with ADC's needs.  The use of reasonable judgement on both parties is in
effect here.

     ADC will accrue your salary for the balance of calendar 1998 and will pay
the accrued balance in January, 1999.

     Bob, ADC looks forward to your re-joining our ranks and I know that you
will  be a positive addition to our management team.

                                       Sincerely,

                                       /s/ Pat Kane
<PAGE>

1.  Various projects to be designed, installed & completed between 11/1/98 -
    10/31/99.

    A.  A PC based computer system w/ network to set up acctg. job costing,
        machine scheduling, data collection, plant security, et al. to
        accomplish an audit from an established general ledger system. (1) ADC
        expects to utilize professional assistance from Gary Fox (CPA) or
        accountants as needed.

    B.  Staff, train & direct a 7 x 24 production crew to produce CD's, DVD's,
        CD-R (printing), diskettes and related fulfillment activities. Machine
        maintenance & GC are your responsibility as well as plant maintenance.

    C.  Review and participate in equipment selection for fulfillment & date
        processing.

    D.  Interact with customers on inventory control of customer owned/provided
        materials as well as quality issues and scheduling.

    E.  Responsible for plant layout to accomodate growth.

    F.  Plan & implement a screen making facility @ ADC when required.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2005 hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant.



                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                            /s/: Terrence S. McGrath
                            ------------------------
                               Terrence S. McGrath
                             Chief Operating Officer
                                   May 9, 2005

                                       21
Order entered April 19, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 00420
- CV
IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF K. B. On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 15593 41



### O RDER
We GRANT the April 15, 2016 motion of Katherine Drew to withdraw as counsel for appellant and substitute Lawrence Mitchell in her place. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove Katherine Drew as appellant’s counsel and add Lawrence Mitchell in her place

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12678]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 10445]


Proposal To Extend Cultural Property Agreement Between the United 
States and Honduras

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Proposal to extend the Memorandum of Understanding between the 
Government of United States of America and the Government of the 
Republic of Honduras Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions 
on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian Cultures of Honduras 
and Ecclesiastical Ethnological Material from the Colonial Period of 
Honduras.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allison Davis, Cultural Heritage 
Center, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs; 202-632-6301; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a392f362a28352a1a292e3b2e3f743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6407110814160b142417100510014a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and 
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of the Memorandum of 
Understanding between the Government of United States of America and 
the Government of the Republic of Honduras Concerning the Imposition of 
Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Pre-Columbian 
Cultures of Honduras and Ecclesiastical Ethnological Material from the 
Colonial Period of Honduras is hereby proposed.
    A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding, the Designated List of 
categories of material restricted from import into the United States, 
and related information can be found at the Cultural Heritage Center 
website: http://culturalheritage.state.gov.

Marie Therese Porter Royce,
Assistant Secretary Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-12678 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### MORGAN DRIVE AWAY OF FLORIDA, INC., Petitioner, v. Paula F. HAWKINS et al., Respondents. 

No. 52984.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 20, 1978.

Gregory A. Presnell of Akerman, Senter-fitt & Eidson, Orlando, for petitioner.

Prentice P. Pruitt, Legal Director, and M. Robert Christ, Staff Counsel, Fla. Public Service Com’n, Tallahassee, for respondents.

Felix A. Johnston, Jr., of Woods, Johnston & Erwin, Tallahassee, for Interstate Mobilehome Towing, Anchor Mobile Home Movers, Inc. and Mobilehome Towing Service, Inc., intervening petitioners.

Selig I. Goldin of Goldin & Cates, Gaines-ville, for A. W. Tanner and Maude T. Tanner, intervening respondents.

PER CURIAM.

A. W. and Maude T. Tanner applied with the Public Service Commission for certificates of public convenience and necessity for transporting mobile homes in certain Florida counties, including Alachua. Morgan Drive Away of Florida, Inc. and other certificate holders serving the area intervened in the proceedings to protest issuance of the application. After hearing the parties the Commission ordered that a certificate be issued to the Tanners.

Intervenors brought a petition for certio-rari here. After oral argument and consideration of the briefs we have found no *862departure from the essential requirements of law in the Commission’s action. The order is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.
Richard D. Smith
                                Media Consultant
                                250 East 54th St.
                               New York, NY 10022
                                  917-270-1767

                           MEDIA CONSULTING AGREEMENT

This agreement between Richard D. Smith (RDS) and Roanoke Technology Corp.(RTC),
a Florida Corporation is entered into on July 5, 2001.

RDS agrees to make available 48 editorial type stories to 15 thousand newspaper
publications over the next 12 months. RDS guarantees a minimum of 7200 story
placements will occur over the media campaign.

RTC will pay RDS for these services in the form of s-8 stock, that will be
registered as soon as feasible, in the amount of 1.2 million shares. In
addition, RTC will make available to RDS $50,000 in services which may be used
at RDS's discretion. These services may be transferred of assigned as RDS sees
fit.

Payment of Stock will be transferred, upon registration, to RDS via DTC using
the following information:

Richard David Smith ( ss # ###-##-#### )
Account # : 82871429
Charles Schwab & Co. DTC # :0164

/s/ David Smith                           /s/ Richard D. Smith
--------------------------------          -------------------------------
David Smith, CEO / President                  Richard D. Smith
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 794 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 794

 To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that individuals in 
prison shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to 
    the last place of residence before incarceration, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2019

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that individuals in 
prison shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to 
    the last place of residence before incarceration, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Correct the Census Count Act''.

SEC. 2. RESIDENCE OF INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g)(1) Effective beginning with the 2020 decennial census of 
population, in taking any tabulation of total population by States 
under subsection (a) for purposes of the apportionment of 
Representatives in Congress among the several States, the Secretary 
shall, with respect to an individual incarcerated in a State, Federal, 
county, or municipal correctional center as of the date on which such 
census is taken, attribute such individual to such individual's last 
place of residence before incarceration.
    ``(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall consult 
with each State department of corrections to collect the information 
necessary to make the determination required under paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6907
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STEVE SILVER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-95-110-BR, CA-97-209-5-BR) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steve Silver, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motions filed under F ED . R. CRIM . P. 35(a), and 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Silver , Nos. CR-95-110-BR; CA-97-209-5-BR (E.D.N.C. May 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kimberly BISHOP, Lynn Lewis, Tonya Baker and Sue Gamble.

No. 60575.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

Sam N. Gregorio, Gregorio & Frazier, Shreveport, for defendants-relators.

*999William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Henry N. Brown, Jr., Dist. Atty., James M. Bullers, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Defendants, Kimberly Bishop, Lynn Lewis, Tonya Baker and Sue Gamble, were charged with violations of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, La.R.S. 26:88(8), which, in pertinent part, provides:

> “No person holding a retail dealer’s permit and no agent, associate, employee, representative, or servant of any such person shall do or permit any of the following acts to be done on or about the licensed premises:

> « * * *

> “(8) Employ or permit females, commonly known as B girls, to solicit patrons for drinks and to accept drinks from patrons and receive therefor any commission or remuneration in any other way.”

The bills of information recited that each defendant, “as an employee of Black Knight Lounge, did solicit patrons for drinks and accept drinks from patrons and receive remuneration therefor on the licensed premises . . The defendants unsuccessfully moved to quash the bills in the trial court. We granted writs. The bills of information do not charge defendants with a crime known to the law of Louisiana. The pertinent statute, La. R.S. 26:88(8), condemns employment of B girls, or the granting of permission to them, to solicit and accept drinks for commission on a licensed premises. The bills of information merely charge defendants with acting as B girls, i. e., soliciting and accepting drinks for pay, and do not charge them with employing or permitting B girls to ply their trade. See, *State v. Daye,*243 La. 725, 146 So.2d 786 (1962).

The judgment of the district court is vacated. Defendants’ motion to quash is granted.
#### Joseph L. SMITH v. STATE of Louisiana, Through DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

No. 62182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Joseph L. Smith, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, and stay order, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Avoyelles.

Granted. It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### MERRITT ISLAND LAND COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Lee UDEN, Realtor, Appellee.

No. 70-110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Robert WILLIAMS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                               November 2, 2011

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.    Other Events
----------   --------------------------------------------

     The following is a summary of assets under management as of October 31,
2011 (in millions):


	By Investment Vehicle
	---------------------

Separate Accounts	 	$  3,262
Mutual Funds 			   4,063
Sub-Advised Mutual Funds	     974
Private Investment Funds	     175
                                --------
Total			       	$  8,474

	By Investment Strategy
	----------------------
Small Cap			$    937
Small-Mid Cap		             281
Select				     324
Large Cap 			   4,702
Long-Short		           2,060
Strategic Income		     170
				--------
Total			        $  8,474

                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------


     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: November 2, 2011	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
258 La. 357

#### June HOCKWALD, wife of Jacques de Bony de LAVERGNE v. Jacques de Bony de LAVERGNE.

No. 51296.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Jacques de Bony de Lavergne applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 244 So.2d 698.

Writ refused. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is correct.