alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2008, (the Report) of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | /s/ Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                               
|                      |  | Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                                   
|                      |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/Director                          
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                     
|                      | 
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | /s/ Francie P. Reppy                                                              
|                      |  | Francie P. Reppy                                                                  
|                      |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  | (Chief Financial Officer)
254 La. 865

#### Mrs. Ruby GATTE v. COAL OPERATORS CASUALTY CO.

No. 50091.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Ruby Gatte applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Jefferson Davis. 225 So.2d 256.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Deventrell WEST.

No. 54073.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 1974.

Patsy Jo McDowell, Law Offices of Patsy Jo McDowell, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie Brown, Dist. Atty., Nathan E. Wilson, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

TATE, Justice.

The defendant West was convicted of armed robbery, La.R.S. 14:64, and sentenced to fifteen years in prison. On his appeal, he relies upon one bill of exceptions.

This bill was taken, to the effective exclusion of women from the jury venire. By virtue of Louisiana law, women are not selected for jury service unless they have previously filed a written declaration of the desire to be subject to such service. La.Const., Art. VII, Section 41 (1921); La.C.Cr.P. art. 402.

The persuasive arguments made by counsel for the male defendant have repeatedly been rejected by a majority of this court, recently most comprehensively in State v. Womack, 283 So.2d 708 (La.1973). We therefore do not accede to them now.

Accordingly, we find no merit in the bill and consequently affirm the conviction and sentence.

Affirmed.

*197SUMMERS, J., concurs in the result.

BARHAM, J., concurs. Exclusion of females from jury service is unconstitutional.
EXHIBIT 11.1

Computation of Earnings Per Share

The
following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.

Earnings Per Share

Net Income / Weighted
average shares of common stock outstanding for the period



|                                    |  |                              |           |      |   |          
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                    |  | Three months endedMarch 
31,
|                                    |  | 2010                         |           | 2009
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                              | 1,589,411 |      |   | 1,589,411
|Net Income                          |  | $                            | 460,651   |      | $ | 523,594  
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                            | 0.29      |      | $ | 0.33     

No common stock equivalents exist.
#### George T. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-142.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 22, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit ■ Court, Palm Beach County; Joseph P. Metzger, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) TIP Development 

Source Specific Emission Limitations & Standards 

Technical Support Document 

Rule A -Aluminum Processing 

1.0 Introduction & Source ~escri~tion'~ 

Aluminum processing includes secondary aluminum production and other types of metal 

processing, such as extrusion and drawing. Secondary aluminum producers recycle aluminum 

fiom aluminum-containing scrap, while primary aluminum producers convert bauxite ore into 

aluminum. An aluminum processing facility may include secondary aluminum production, or 

simply purchase alumhum as raw material to fiuther process. Scrap aluminum or alumbm raw 

material is then converted into products such as tubing and miscellaneous aluminum parts for 

industries such as aerospace. 

Secondary aluminum production involves two general categories of operation, scrap 

pretreatment and smeltindrefining. Scrap pretreatment involves sorting and processing scrap to 

remove con taminants and to prepare the material for smelting. Sorting and processing separates 

the aluminum hm other metals, dirt, oil, plastics, and paint. Some facilities only process 

"clean" scrap, which is fiee of paints, coatings, etc. Smelting/rejining operations include 

charging, melting, refining, alloying, and pomhgltapping. 

A melting fimace is used to melt the scrap and remove impurities and entrained gases. Charging 

consists of placing pretreated aluminum scrap into a melted alwnum pool (heel) that is 

maintained in melting hates. The scrap is normally placed into the finnace charging well, 

where heat fiom the molten aluminum surrounding the scrap causes it to melt by conduction. 

Scrap may be charged as high density bales, loosely packed bales, or as dry shredded scrap that 

is continuously fed from a conveyor. 

Additional processes include fluxing and alloying. Flux materials combine with contamhates 

and float to the surfiace of the aluminum, thereby trapping impurities. Alloying combines 

aluminum with an alloying agent in order to change its strength and ductility. Some typical 

atloying agents include zinc, copper, manganese, magnesium, and silicon. Skimming is 

normally conducted several times during the melt cycle to remove con-. Foflowing the 

last skimming, the melt is allowed to cool before pouring into molds or casting machines. 

The cast alumhum is then used as raw mated for further processing, such as extrusion and 

drawing. These processes can either be conducted with the application of heat to the metal or 

cold. Lubricants can include waxes and oils. The aluminum is extruded or drawn through dies 

to achieve the desired shape. Several combustion sources are usually present at such facilities, 

including agdanneal ovens and heat treat furnaces. The alutninum parts or tubes are usually heat 

freated to ensure the appropriate properties are imparted to the final product. Solvents are used 

for cleaning and for labeling of final product. Coatings to protect the final product during 

shipment may also be applied 

1 011 0100 Draft 

For internal review only
## NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF PUBL IC HEARING ON AUGUST 15, 2012

Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Planning

Pursuant to the public hearing provisions in Ti tle 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 section 102, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) is cancelling the following public hearing because no requ est for a hearing was received:



### August 15, 2012 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. PEBP Board Room (St. 1002)

901 South Stewart Street Carson City, Nevada

The NDEP’s proposed revisions to Nevada’s Cl ean Air Act § 110(A)(2) (infrastructure) state implementation plans and re lated materials are availabl e on the NDEP website at http://ndep.nv.gov/admin/public.htm , click on “Air Quality Planni ng.” Persons may also check

on the status of Nevada’s SIP revi sion by telephone at (775) 687-9356.
---

March 27, 2009

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F           
|    | Consent of Expert                    

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Annual
Report) to be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by reference the
Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008.

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with
reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following technical
reports (the "Technical Reports"):

- Revised Technical Report on the Update of the June 21, 2007 Technical
  Report (Optimized Feasibility Study), inclusive of Updated Mineral Resource
  and Reserve Estimates for the Burnstone Gold Project, Mpumalanga Province of
  The Republic of South Africa, dated February 27, 2009; and
- Revised Technical Report on the Mineral Resources and Reserves at the
  Hollister Development Block Gold Project, Elko County, Nevada dated February
  27, 2009.

and to references to the Technical Reports, or portions
thereof, in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of the information derived from the Technical Reports in the Annual
Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ Phil Bentley, Pr. Sci. Nat.

|                            | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Phil Bentley, Pr. Sci. Nat. | 

---
THE TIREX CORPORATION
                          CERTIFICATE OF THE SECRETARY



         The Board of Directors of THE TIREX CORPORATION (the `Company'), has
adopted the following resolution at a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors
held May 30, 2001, which is now in full force and effect:


                  RESOLVED, that the Company amend The Tirex
                  Corporation Stock Plan by reallocating the
                  7,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock,
                  previously allocated to be given as Awards,
                  5,000,000 of which shares are to be used as
                  Options and 2,000,000 of which shares are to be
                  used as Grants.



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, as Secretary of said Corporation, have hereunto
set my hand and affixed the seal of the Company on this 30th day of May, 2001.


                                           /s/ MICHAEL D. A. ASH
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael D.A. Ash, Secretary Treasurer
                                           And Chief Financial Officer




Consent of Majority of the Board of Directors



/s/ LOUIS SANZARO
---------------------------            Director                  May 30, 2001
Louis Sanzaro

/s/ LOUIS V. MURO
---------------------------            Director                  May 30, 2001
Louis V. Muro

/s/ JOHN L. THRESHIE JR.
---------------------------            Director                  May 30, 2001
John L. Threshie, Jr.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Network CN Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 2, for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Godfrey Hui, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 /s/
      Godfrey HuiGodfrey
      HuiChief
      Executive OfficerOctober
      22, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000037008
<NAME> FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      23,200,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,513,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,214,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,927,000
<PP&E>                                     841,765,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             127,409,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             849,581,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       38,249,000
<BONDS>                                    448,060,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       31,416,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    31,737,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 178,588,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               849,581,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           240,871,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              177,950,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            55,609,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          37,567,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (30,255,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (25,531,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.84)
        

</TABLE>
#### William C. O’BRIEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41273.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 12, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. See Rule 4.5c (6), Florida Appellate Rules.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
              This schedule contains certain summary information extracted from
              the financial statements dated June 30, 1999 and is qualified in
              its entirety by reference to such financial information.
</LEGEND>



<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              3,277,342
<SECURITIES>                                        7,639,504
<RECEIVABLES>                                      10,030,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                        75,542,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  102,301,547
<PP&E>                                              2,829,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    113,786,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              81,447,525
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 6
<COMMON>                                               29,955
<OTHER-SE>                                         16,778,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      113,786,217
<SALES>                                            16,320,568
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   18,535,353
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      15,421,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,619,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       450,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                          132,016
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   318,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          318,023
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.01






</TABLE>
#### SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, etc., Appellant, v. COUNTY OF DADE, etc. et al., Appellees.

No. 39784.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstHartford Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I Neil H. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant toss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

                      /s/ NeilH. Ellis                           

NeilH. Ellis

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

 

Date: January 11, 2011
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUST


FORM
10-Q JUNE 30, 2010





Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust (“the
Company”) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C. Staples,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
              /s/Thomas C. StaplesName:
              Thomas
      C. StaplesChief
      Financial Officer





August
9, 2010
#### Edsel POSEY v. STATE.

No. 37992.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 214 So.2d 750.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 23, 2013

NO. 03-11-00685-CV

William Andrew Allen, Appellant

v.

Tina Marie Bauer Allen, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s final decree 

of divorce: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the trial court’s final 

decree of divorce is in all things affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that appellant 

has filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs, it is FURTHER ordered that no costs of appeal be 

assessed against appellant; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Leslie J. Christon, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Shells Seafood Restaurants, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report. 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation. 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 26, 2004
#### CUTLER-HAMMER, INC., a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. The BENDIX CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-829.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Okaloosa County; Richard H. Cooper, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.