alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Adele BORSERINE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43563.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 14, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 273 So.2d 802.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### Donald Edward BARBER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-723.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Osceola County; Richard L. Cooper, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 12(b)

			FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
			    COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
											       Six Months Ended
												 June 30, 2000
												   (millions)


RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<S>                                                                                                 <C>
Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................         $ 285
  Income taxes ............................................................................           157
  Fixed charges, as below .................................................................            88

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................         $ 530

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ........................................................................         $  82
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................             2
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................             4

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................         $  88

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ........................................................          6.02




RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS

Earnings, as defined:
  Net income ..............................................................................         $ 285
  Income taxes ............................................................................           157
  Fixed charges, as below .................................................................            88

    Total earnings, as defined ............................................................         $ 530

Fixed charges, as defined:
  Interest charges ........................................................................         $  82
  Rental interest factor ..................................................................             2
  Fixed charges included in nuclear fuel cost .............................................             4

    Total fixed charges, as defined .......................................................            88

Non-tax deductible preferred stock dividends ..............................................             7
Ratio of income before income taxes to net income .........................................          1.55

Preferred stock dividends before income taxes .............................................            11

Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends ......................................         $  99

Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends .................          5.35
</TABLE>
|  |           JIMMY C.H.      CHEUNG & CO.          Certified Public      Accountants          Members of Kreston International |   | Registered      with the Public CompanyAccounting      Oversight Board |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1607      Dominion Centre, 43 Queen’s Road East, Wanchai, Hong KongTelephone:      (852) 25295500 Fax: (852) 28651067 Email:      jimmy.cheung@jchcheungco.hkWebsite:      http://www.jchcheungco.hk | Kreston      International with offices in EuropeAmerica,      The Middle East, The Far East and  Australia |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7650

THOMAS HARLEY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(3:10-cv-02296-RBH)

Submitted: March 15, 2011 Decided: March 18, 2011

Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Harley, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Harley seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). 

The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and 

advised Harley that failure to file timely and specific

objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review 

of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Harley

has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after 

receiving proper notice.*

 * The district court granted Harley one extension of time in 

which to file his objections, and did not abuse its discretion 

in denying a second extension. 

 Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal.
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR GLADSTONE RESOURCES, INC. FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         303,814
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               309,905
<PP&E>                                         639,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 413,209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 577,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,332
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       150,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,230,134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   577,864
<SALES>                                          8,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,139
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,189)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,189)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,189)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40822

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REYNALDO MORALES-GUTIERREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 1:06-CR-50-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Reynaldo MoralesGutierrez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
#### R & G PROPERTIES, INC., Appellant, v. Gertrude ROTHBARD, Appellee.

No. 70-445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Rehearing Denied March 12, 1971.

Cushman & Cushman, Miami, for appellant.

Podhurst, Orseck & Parks, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tutwiler v. I. Beverally Nalle, Inc., 152 Fla. 479, 12 So.2d 163 (1943); Kimmons v. Crawford, 92 Fla. 652, 109 So. 585 (1926); Smith v. Mont*539gomery Ward & Co., Fla.App. 1970, 232 So.2d 195; Sears, Roebuck & Company v. Sheppard, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 62; Ortner v. Linch, Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 152; and 52 C.J.S. Landlord & Tenant § 418.
03/10/201 1 1G:4 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A+ DM S g|001/00 3



## '^mii mO F :;-ANSPpRW!ON , Befor e th e U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n \: T OFERA l ION S Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n mHA R! 0 P U

- 5 0 I n th e matte r

o f M & RHELICOPTE R Docke t No . CFlOSOOOl l FAA Cas e No . 2009SO95043 4 Chic r Judg e Ronni e A . Yodcr COMPLAINANT' S RESPONS E T O M«& RHELICOPTER' S MOTIO N T O DLSMTS S RECURREN T FAILIN GT O MEE T FILIN GDEADLINE S - 4 MOR E Complainan t

files thi s respons e t o Responden t M «f e RHelicopters ' (Respondent ) Motioj i t o Dismis s - Recurren t Failin g l o Mee t

Filin g Deadline s - 4 More . Respondent' s motio n i s premise do n th e contentio n tha t Complainan t

filedlat e response s t o Respondent' s "four

additional Motion s fo

r More Definite Statement. " Responden t state s that "th e du e dat e fo

r response s wa s February 3 , 2011. " Complainan t

filedit s timel y response. s t o Thes e motion s o n February 3 , 2011 . Thi s motio n hit s n o merit . WHEREFORE , Complainan t respectfully request s that th e Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e den y Respondent' s Motio n fo r Judgmen t

t o Dismis s - Failin g to Mee t Filin g Deadline s - 4 More .03/10/201 1 1G;4 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A •> • DM S 0002/00 3

Respectfull y submitted , Peter J . Lync h Assistan t Chie f Counse l ir aPonto Attorne y Enforcement

Division , AGC-30 0 Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Wa.shington , D C 2059 1 Phone : (202)267-986 3 Facsimile : (202)267-510 6 Date : February 16 , 201 103/10/201 1 16:4 8 FA X 202493514 2 FA A* DM S 0003/00 3

Certificat e of

Servic e I hereb y certif

y that o n thi s date I hav e place di n th e U.S . mail , postag e prepaid , certifie dreturn-receipt , acop y of Motio n fo

r Judgmen t

l o Dismis s - Failin g t o Mee t Filin g Deadline s - 4 More . In (h e Matter of M A H Helicopters , Docke t No . CPlOSOOO

l 10 , FAA Cas e no . 2009SO950434 . addresse dto : Dr . Michae l B . Seli g Presiden t M <f e RHelicopters , LL

C 204 5 Wostgate Dr. , Suite 20 5 Bethlehem , P

A 1801 7 I n addition , 1 hereb y certif y tha t o n thi s dal e I hav e sent

b y th e U.S . mail , postag e prepaid , certifie dreturn-receip t andfacsimil e on e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t

to : Th e Honorabl e Rormi e A . Yodcr Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 Facsimile : 202-366-753 6 I n addition , 1 hereb y certif y that o n thi s date I hav e sent

by th e U.S . mail , postag e prepaid , certifie dreturn-receipt , th e original an don e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t

to : Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Wilbu r Wright Buildin g - Suite 2W100 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Attn : Hearin g Docket

Clerk , AGC-43 0

^N'M ^ S^r ^ Dated : February 16 , 201 1
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12309]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Annual Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 20, 2018.

PLACE: NonProfit HR, 1400 Eye Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 
20005.

STATUS: Open (with the exception of Executive Sessions).

CONTACT PERSON: Rutledge Simmons, Acting EVP & General Counsel/
Secretary, (202) 760-4105; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecbebf85818183829fac829bc2839e8b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bdefeed4d0d0d2d3cefdd3ca93d2cfda">[email protected]</span></a>.

Agenda

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Minutes
III. Report from Interim CEO
IV. Board Elections
V. Executive Session: Internal Audit Report
VI. Adjournment

    The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in his 
opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2) 
and (4) permit closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:

<bullet> Report from CEO
<bullet> Internal Audit Report

Rutledge Simmons,
Acting EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12309 Filed 6-4-18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AFS-13-294-E

May 16, 2013

 Exemption No. 10770

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0308

Mr. Stephen Wright

Parent of Luke Wright

8671 Open Meadow Way

Columbia, MD 21045

Dear Mr. Wright:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received March 23, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Luke Wright for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Luke to exceed the 

specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by 

AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States 

(U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Luke.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 
2

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by 

persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Luke Wright exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b). In 

addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Luke is aboard 

its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow 

Luke to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Luke’s parents or 

a caregiver accompanying him. Luke Wright may only occupy a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind him. In addition, Luke’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this 

exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours 

before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

Enclosure
# Službeni list C 271/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1088
  doi:10.3000/19771088.C_2013.271.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 271 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | 5619 rujna 2013. |

ISSN 1977-1088

doi:10.3000/19771088.C_2013.271.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 271

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

5619 rujna 2013.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | Europski gospodarski i socijalni odbor |
| | 490. plenarno zasjedanje od 22. i 23. svibnja 2013. |
| 2013/C 271/01 | Obavijest za čitatelje | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

Europski gospodarski i socijalni odbor

490. plenarno zasjedanje od 22. i 23. svibnja 2013.

2013/C 271/01

Obavijest za čitatelje

1

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Europski gospodarski i socijalni odbor

490. plenarno zasjedanje od 22. i 23. svibnja 2013.

| 19.9.2013 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2013

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 271/1

---

OBAVIJEST ZA ČITATELJE

Mišljenja Gospodarskog i socijalnog odbora objavljena u drugim jezičnim verzijama u ovom izdanju Službenog lista Europske unije usvojena su prije pristupanja Hrvatske Europskoj uniji te stoga nisu prevedena na hrvatski.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
U.S. Office Products Company:
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
on Form S-8 (333-01574), (333-12789) and (333-24581), on Form S-3 (333-10383)
and (333-14025) and on Form S-4 (333-13133) of U.S. Office Products Company of
our reports dated August 28, 1996 with respect to the balance sheets of SFI
Corp. and Hano Document Printers, Inc. as of December 31, 1995, and the related
statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 1995, which reports appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of U.S. Office Products Company.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Norfolk, Virginia
June 30, 1997
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)December 8, 2015(Date of earliest event reported)December 7, 2015





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn December 7, 2015, we and ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) announced we will present at the Wells Fargo Energy Symposium in New York City on December 8, 2015.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on both ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ websites,www.oneok.comandwww.oneokpartners.com.  The materials used at the conference were accessible on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites beginning at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7:00 a.m. Central Standard Time) on December 8, 2015.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated December 7, 2015.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:December 8, 2015By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated December 7, 2015.








4