alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 March 30, 2005

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits
---------   ---------------------------------

          The following exhibit is included with this Report:

          Exhibit 99.1   Press release, dated March 30, 2005, announcing
                         earnings of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
                         for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: March 30, 2005                        By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.24

                               2002-1 AMENDMENT
                               ----------------
                                      TO
                                      --
                                STEELCASE INC.
                                --------------
                          DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
                          --------------------------


     This is an amendment by Steelcase Inc. ("Employer").

                              W I T N E S S E T H
                              - - - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS, Steelcase Inc. adopted the Steelcase Inc. Deferred Compensation
Plan on August 6, 1999, effective September 1, 1999 (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6.10 of the Plan, the Employer has reserved
the right to amend the Plan at any time; and

     WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan to permit the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Employer to authorize participation
in the Plan by eligible employees of related entities.

     NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Plan is hereby amended by the addition
of a new Section 6.11, "Extension of Coverage," effective March 1, 2001,
renumbering all successive sections accordingly, to read as follows:

          "6.11 Extension of Coverage. The Compensation Committee of the Board
                ---------------------
     of Directors may, in its discretion, authorize extension of Plan coverage
     to eligible Employees of entities related to the Company."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment is executed this 19/th/ day of April,
2001.


                                   STEELCASE INC.


                                   By:   /s/ Nancy W. Hickey
                                      ----------------------------
                                         Sr. Vice President,
                                   Its:  Global Human Resources
                                       ---------------------------
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 1951

JUAN ORTIZ ALVARADO , Petitioner ,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition f or Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 17, 2020 Decided: March 30, 2020

Before MOTZ, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Alfred Lincoln Robertson, Jr., ROBERTSON LAW OFFICE, PLLC, Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant Director, Aric A. Anderson, O ffice of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D .C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Juan Ortiz Alvarado, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. W e have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Alvarado ’s merits hearing and all supporting evide nce. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (201 8 ), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision, see Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 359 ( 4th Cir. 2009); Dankam v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir. 2007). Further, we find Alvarado’s due process claim to be unavailing because he fails to show that the alleged errors impacted the outcome

of his case. See Anim v. Mukasey , 535 F.3d 243, 25 6 (4th Cir. 2008); accord Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 320

- 22 (4th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.

See In re Alvarado (B.I.A. Aug. 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts a nd legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District

FRL #: 9956-25-Region9

Docket #: EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0318

A-1. IC 217 Docket Files – excluding State submittal

A-2. EPA’s Technical Support Document IC 217-101-202, Nov 2016.

B-1. Letter from Robert D. Fletcher, Deputy Executive Officer, CARB, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional 

Administrator, EPA, dated May 17, 2011. 

C-1. SJVAPCD Rule 4570 Confined Animal Facilities, adopted October 21, 2010, approved January 17, 

2012 (77 FR 2228) 

C-2. SCAQMD Rule 223 Emissions Reduction Permits for Large Confined Animal Facilities, adopted 

June 2, 2006, approved July 13, 2015 (80 FR 39966); 

C-3. SCAQMD Rule 1127 Emission Reductions from Livestock Waste, adopted August 6, 2004, 

approved May 23, 2013 (78 FR 30768); 

C-4. Idaho Administrative Procedure Act (IDAPA) 58.01.01 Sections 760-764: Rules for the Control of 

Ammonia from Dairy Farms (adopted March 30, 2007; amended May 8, 2009).

C-5. Scientific Basis for the Control of Ammonia from Dairy Farms Best Management 

Practices, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, July 18, 2006. 

C-6. United States Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Air Division Technical Support 

Document for EPA’s Direct Final Rulemaking, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District, Rule 101, 

Definitions, USEPA, May 2014.

C-7. US EPA’s Region IX Technical Support Document for EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 

Imperial County Air Pollution Control District’s Rule 201, Permits Required Rule 202, Exemptions, 

January 2011.

C-8. 77 FR 2228 (January 17, 2012)

D-1. “Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,” EPA, May 25, 1988 

(the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990).

D-2. “Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies,” EPA Region 9, 

August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). 

D-3. "State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean 

Air Act Amendments of 1990," 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).

D-4. “State Implementation Plans for Serious PM-10 Nonattainment Areas, and Attainment Date 

Waivers for PM-10 Nonattainment Areas Generally; Addendum to the General Preamble for the 

Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994).

E-1. 2015-05-21 Email re EPA comments.

E-2. Attachment - EPA Comments May 21, 2015.

E-3. 2015-09-04 Email re Draft Rule 217 EPA comments.

E-4. Attachment - Draft Rule Rv7 EPA comments.

E-5. 2018-02-08 Email re EPA comments.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 March 1, 2005

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of February 28, 2005, preliminary assets under management totaled
$597.2 million.  Following is a summary of assets under management as of
February 28, 2005 (in millions):

				Equity	Fixed Income	   Total
Individually Managed Accounts	$164.3	      $107.5      $271.8
Mutual Funds			 225.9	        64.2       290.1
Alternative Investments		  35.3	         0.0        35.3
                                ------        ------      ------
Total				 425.5	       171.7       597.2


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: March 1, 2005  	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
#### HABER v. KALMANSON.

No. 38023.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 213 So.2d 613.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

BENJAMIN A. GIBBS, a/k/a Hev, a/k/a Bubba,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Beaufort. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. (9:98-cr-00322-PMD-2; 

9:16-cv-01484-PMD)

Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin A. Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Evans Limehouse, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Dean Hodge Secor, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin A. Gibbs seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibbs has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 
  CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  TO
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
 NETWORK
CN INC.
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No,
333-141943 on Form S-8 of Network CN Inc. relating to our audit of the
consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of Network CN Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
  /s/Webb
& Company, P.A
 WEBB
& COMPANY, P.A.
 Certified
Public Accountants
  Boynton
Beach, Florida
 March
12, 2008
 
 1501
Corporate Drive, Suite 150 • Boynton Beach, FL 33426
 Telephone:
(561) 752-1721 • Fax: (561) 734-8562
 www.cpawebb.com
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT  MARCH 2010

Sauer-Danfoss Inc.

Jurisdiction of
Formation

Business PurposeSauer-Danfoss (US) Company

Delaware

Manufacturing & SalesHydro-Gear, Inc.

Delaware

Holding CompanyHydro-Gear Limited Partnership

Illinois

Manufacturing & SalesTSD Integrated Controls LLC

Delaware

In LiquidationSauer-Danfoss Pty Ltd.

Australia

SalesSauer-Danfoss BVBA

Belgium

SalesSauer-Danfoss Hidraulica Mobil Ltda.

Brazil

ManufacturingSauer-Danfoss Ltda.

Brazil

SalesSauer-Danfoss Shanghai Hydrostatic Transmission Co., Ltd.

China

ManufacturingSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Mobile Hydraulics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

China

SalesSauer-Danfoss Shanghai Co. Ltd.

China

ManufacturingSauer-Danfoss ApS

Denmark

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss Holding ApS

Denmark

Holding CompanySauer-Danfoss BV

Netherlands

SalesOy Sauer-Danfoss AB

Finland

SalesSauer-Danfoss S.A.S.

France

SalesSauer-Danfoss GmbH & Co. OHG

Germany

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss GmbH

Germany

Holding/Management CompanySauer-Danfoss Informatik GmbH

Germany

Information ServicesSauer-Danfoss India Private Limited

India

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss S.r.l.

Italy

Manufacturing & SalesDaikin-Sauer-Danfoss Manufacturing Ltd.

Japan

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Ltd.

Japan

SalesSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Ltd., Korea

Korea

SalesSauer-Danfoss A/S

Norway

SalesSauer-Danfoss sp.z.o.o.

Poland

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss LLC

Russia

SalesSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Pte. Ltd.

Singapore

SalesSauer-Danfoss a.s.

Slovakia

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss SA

Spain

SalesSauer-Danfoss AB

Sweden

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss Limited

United Kingdom

Sales


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2009, (the Report) of First
West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                               
|                        |  |  |  | Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                                   
|                        |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/Director                          
|                        |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                     
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Francie P. Reppy                                                              
|                        |  |  |  | Francie P. Reppy                                                                  
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  |  |  | (Chief Financial Officer)
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUSTFORM 10-Q/A - MARCH 31, 2006

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A of Winthrop Realty Trust (the
Company)  for the three  months  ended March 31,  2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the Report),  I,
Thomas C. Staples,  Chief Financial  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section
1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the
Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,
the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   | /s/ Thomas C. Staples                      | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|      |                                            | 
|Name: | Thomas C. Staples 
Chief Financial Officer | 

August
  23, 2006

47
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Kenneth Lee MOORE v. COURT REPORTER, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, SEC. “F”, PARISH OF ORLEANS.

No. 61703.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: Kenneth Lee Moore, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14-574V

Filed: October 15, 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

LINDA COTHERN, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Trivalent Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

* Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration; SIRVA

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On July 7, 2014, Linda Cothern filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,

2

[the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury which 

was caused by the influenza vaccine she received on September 26, 2013. Petition at

1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special 

Masters.

On October 15, 2014, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report [“Res. Report”] in 

which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Res. Report 

at 3. Specifically, respondent indicates “that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with 

a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and that it was caused in 

fact by the flu vaccine she received on September 26, 2013.” Id. Respondent agrees 

that petitioner’s injury lasted for more than six months and that no other causes for 

petitioner’s injury can be identified. Id.

 

1

Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).
2

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master