alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Ferdi Dippenaar, Chief Executive Officer of Great Basin Gold
Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
        fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Annual Report) fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.                                                                                   

| | By:    | */s/
      Ferdi Dippenaar*
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| | Name:  | Ferdi Dippenaar            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        |                            
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | March 21, 2006             

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---




---
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF BROWN ARMSTRONG PAULDENMcCOWN  HILL STARBUCK & KEETERACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION

April 9, 2002            We consent to the incorporation by reference in thisRegistration Statement of Royale Energy, Inc., on Form S-3, of our report dated January 11, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report onForm 10-KSB of Royale Energy, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2000, and to the reference to us under the heading“Experts” in the Prospectus which is part of this Registration Statement.                                                         BROWN ARMSTRONG PAULDEN                                                          McCOWN HILL STARBUCK & KEETER                                                          ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
SCPW-18-0000466
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

OKHOO HANES, Petitioner,

vs. THE HONORABLE HILARY B. GANGNES, Judge of the District Court of the First Circuit, Respondent Judge, and SCOTTRADE, INC. and ED BARAOIDAN, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CIV. NO. 1SC17-1-2015)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

AND/OR PROHIBITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Browning, in place of McKenna, J., recused) Upon consideration of petitioner Okhoo Hanes’s petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, filed on June 1, 2018, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that she is entitled to the requested relief sought by way of an extraordinary writ. See HRS §§ 633-27 and 633-28; Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-18-0000466 15-JUN-2018 08:38 AMthe petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to

relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action); Honolulu Advertiser, Inc. v. Takao, 59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition are extraordinary remedies meant to, among other things, restrain a judge of an inferior court from acting beyond or in excess of his or her jurisdiction; they are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the trial courts or cure a mere legal error). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 15, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ R. Mark Browning

2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7474 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7474

To direct the Secretary of Defense to issue guidance for the review of 
  suicide events involving members of the Armed Forces, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2020

Mrs. Trahan (for herself, Ms. Speier, and Mr. Cisneros) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to issue guidance for the review of 
  suicide events involving members of the Armed Forces, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Comprehensive Review of Military 
Suicide Act''.

SEC. 2. MULTIDISCIPLINARY BOARD TO EVALUATE SUICIDE EVENTS.

    (a) Guidance Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall issue 
guidance that requires each suicide event involving a member of a 
covered Armed Force to be reviewed by a multidisciplinary board 
established at the command or installation level. Such guidance shall 
require that, for each suicide event reviewed by such a board, the 
board will--
            (1) clearly define the objective, purpose, and outcome of 
        the review;
            (2) take a multidisciplinary approach to the review and 
        include, as part of the review process, leaders of military 
        units, medical and mental health professionals, and 
        representatives of military criminal investigative 
        organizations;
            (3) obtain the data necessary to make a comprehensive 
        Department of Defense suicide event report submission; and
            (4) take appropriate steps to protect and share information 
        obtained from ongoing investigations into the event (such as 
        medical and law enforcement reports).
    (b) Implementation by Covered Armed Forces.--Not later than 90 days 
after the date on which the guidance is issued under subsection (a), 
the chiefs of the covered Armed Forces shall implement the guidance.
    (c) Progress Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 
congressional defense committees a report on the progress of the 
Secretary in implementing the guidance required under subsection (a).
    (d) Covered Armed Forces Defined.--In this section, the term 
``covered Armed Forces'' means the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, 
and Space Force.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Network CN Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Earnest Leung, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.      
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Earnest LeungEarnest
      LeungChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





March 31,
2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Network CN Inc. and will be retained by Network CN Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether
made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7963 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to modernize certain processes 

regarding expulsion of credit union members for cause, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 7, 2020 

Mr. EMMER (for himself and Mr. PERLMUTTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Credit Union Act to modernize certain 

processes regarding expulsion of credit union members 

for cause, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Credit Union Govern5 ance Modernization Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPULSION OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNION MEMBERS 

7 FOR CAUSE. 

8 Section 118(a) of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 

9 U.S.C. 1764(a)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7963 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Except’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Ex2 cept’’; 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘by a two-thirds vote of the 

4 members of a Federal credit union present at a spe5 cial meeting called for the purpose, but only after 

6 opportunity has been given him to be heard’’ and in7 serting ‘‘for cause pursuant to a policy adopted by 

8 a majority vote of a quorum of the directors of the 

9 Federal credit union and provided in written or elec10 tronic form to all members of the Federal credit 

11 union’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(2)(A) Any member expelled pursuant to this para14 graph shall— 

15 ‘‘(i) be provided with written or electronic no16 tice of the reason for the expulsion; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) be given an opportunity to request rein18 statement of membership and have the request con19 sidered at a meeting of the board of directors, in a 

20 timely manner after the expulsion. 

21 ‘‘(B) Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to 

22 require a board of directors to allow an expelled member 

23 to address the board in person or attend the meeting de24 scribed in subparagraph (A)(ii) in person. 

25 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘cause’ includes— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7963 IH

1 ‘‘(A) a loss to the Federal credit union; 

2 ‘‘(B) a violation of the membership agreement 

3 of the Federal credit union; 

4 ‘‘(C) a disruption to the operations of a Federal 

5 credit union; and 

6 ‘‘(D) fraud, attempted fraud, other illegal be7 havior, or inappropriate behavior, as defined by the 

8 policy described in paragraph (1), such as physical 

9 or verbal abuse of Federal credit union members or 

10 staff.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Shirley Ann MOUTON v. Victor WALKER, Custodian, La. State Penitentiary at St. Gabriel.

No. 61847.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 31, 1978.

In re: Shirley Ann Mouton applying for writ of certiorari and review. Parish of Lafayette.

Writ denied.
#### John R. JONES et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF POLICE.

No. 5400.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Nov. 10, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 5, 1972.

Writ Refused Jan. 5, 1973.

*274William M. Detweiler, New Orleans, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Michael A. Starks, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee.

Before SAMUEL, REDMANN and STOULIG, JJ.

REDMANN, Judge.

Plaintiff police patrolmen appeal from the rejection by the New Orleans Civil Service Commission of their demand for promotion to vacant field sergeant positions which the Department superintendent has declined to fill from a three-year-old eligibility list. Plaintiffs are the 23 highest-ranked remaining persons on the list (47 promotions having earlier occurred) ; there are 20 vacancies which have more recently occurred.

In all material respects we find this litigation identical in principle with Blake v. Giarrusso, 263 So.2d 392 (La.App., 1972) writ refused 262 La. 1154, 266 So.2d 442. There, rejecting a similar claim by lieutenants seeking captaincies, we held the superintendent has no mandatory duty to fill vacancies by promotion from an earlier-established list of eligibles. As also pointed out in *Blake,*under Const, art. 14 § 15 subd. (0) (1), “The decision of the [appropriate Civil Service] Commission [shall be] final on the facts * * * ” and not subject to appellate review.

The commission’s decision is affirmed.

Affirmed
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUSTFORM 10-Q/A - MARCH 31, 2006

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A of Winthrop Realty Trust (the
Company)  for the three  months  ended March 31,  2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the Report),  I,
Michael L. Ashner,  Chief Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section
1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the
Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,
the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   | /s/ Michael L. Ashner                      | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|      |                                            | 
|Name: | Michael L. Ashner 
Chief Executive Officer | 

August
  23, 2006

46
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Adept Technology, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  |  | the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 14, 2007



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Robert H. Bucher     
|Robert H. Bucher         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|Dated: September 14, 2007



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Lisa M. Cummins       
|Lisa M. Cummins           
|Vice President of Finance,
|Chief Financial Officer   

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Adept Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Adept Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Michael T. Vesey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orleans Homebuilders, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:    November 12, 2002


                                             /s/ Michael T. Vesey
                                             --------------------
                                             Michael T. Vesey
                                             President and COO
#### Dewey GREENE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-277.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.35
Memorandum


To:      Steven Kratz

CC:      Richard Marks
         Selwyn Jaffe

From:    Anthony Souza

Date:    02/23/00

Re:      Employment Contract

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following is an Outline of the Terms of an Employment Contract which I am
Offering on behalf of MPA to You as Senior Vice President Of Operations.

1)     Guaranteed Salary Of $250000.00

2)     A Bonus Program which pays Additional Salary (approx. $50000.00 to
       $100000.00) The Terms of which are to be mutually Agreed upon by MPA and
       Yourself.

3)     One (1) Year Severance Agreement which Guarantees $300000.00 to be paid
       within 60 days of Termination, during the Term of the Employment
       Contract.(The terms of which are to mutually agreed upon by MPA and
       Yourself.)

4)     Three (3) Weeks Vacation Annually

5)     Existing PPO or Comparable Health Plan

6)     Existing Stock Options (aprox. 63000) To be revalued or New Options
       issued at a value to be agreed upon by both MPA and yourself and at a
       time which is mutually agreeable to both parties.

7)     Exclusive use of Your existing Company Car and Gas Credit Card or Car
       Allowance of Equal value.

8)     A Signing Bonus (Payable by April 15the 2000) in an Amount Equal to the
       total Amount of Funds remaining in Your Deferred Compensation Plan
       including all Previous Penalties Paid, Company Matching Funds and any
       Future Penalties. Or all funds remaining in your Deferred Compensation
       Plan Equal to previous Penalties Paid, Company Matching Funds and any
       Future Penalties.

9)     Indemnification Specified in the Employment Contract which Explicitly
       Reaffirms Your Indemnification by MPA and provides for certain Specific
       Indemnity as agreed by You.

10)    The Option on Your part to Unilaterally Terminate the Contract with 60
       days Written Notice or Remain Employed with the Contract in Full Force
       and Effect until the End of the Term of the Contract.

11)    The Term of the Contract Shall be Three (3) years

Accepted By:________________________________ Anthony Souza CEO

Accepted By:________________________________ Steve Kratz SVP Ops
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5394-5395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02009]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public

[[Page 5395]]

notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, February 19, 2014, 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Beatty Community Center, 100 A Avenue South, Beatty, Nevada 
89003.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Ulmer, Board Administrator, 
232 Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 
630-0522; Fax (702) 295-5300 or Email: NSSAB@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the 
Board is to make recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the 
areas of environmental restoration, waste management, and related 
activities.

Tentative Agenda

    1. Nevada National Security Site Communication Plan for Groundwater 
Sampling Results--Work Plan Item 5.
    2. Recommendation Development for Radionuclide Decay at Use-
Restricted Soil Sites--Work Plan Item 3.
    3. Recommendation Development for Groundwater Open House--Work Plan 
Item 4.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Barbara Ulmer at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the phone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral presentations pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Barbara Ulmer at the telephone number listed above. The request 
must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments can do so during the 15 
minutes allotted for public comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Barbara Ulmer at 
the address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx

    Issued at Washington, DC on January 28, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-02009 Filed 1-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```