9204 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 32 / Tuesday, February 18, 2014 / Notices 

requirements of EPA regulations at 40 

CFR part 16. 

CONTESTING RECORDS PROCEDURES: 

Requests for correction or amendment 

must identify the record to be changed 

and the corrective action sought. 

Requests must be submitted to the 

agency contact indicated on the initial 

document for which the related 

contested record was submitted. 

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 

Records deriving for individuals 

commenting on federal rulemaking 

activities and filing FOIA requests and 

appeals. 

SYSTEM EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS

OF THE ACT: 

None. 

[FR Doc. 2014–03430 Filed 2–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9906–90–OGC] 

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air 

Act Citizen Suit 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent 

decree; request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby 

given of a proposed consent decree to 

address a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club in 

the United States District Court for the 

District of Columbia: Sierra Club v. 

McCarthy, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv00385 (BAH) (D.D.C.). On March 25, 

2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint, and on 

June 7, 2013 filed an amended 

complaint, alleging that Gina McCarthy, 

in her official capacity as Administrator 

of the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’), failed to: (a) 

Take timely final action to approve, 

disapprove, or partially approve/

disapprove a State Implementation Plan 

(‘‘SIP’’) submission made by Georgia on 

July 20, 2010 addressing Georgia Rule 

for Air Quality 391–3–1–.02(uuu) and 

(b) take action, within 60 days after they 

were filed, granting or denying several 

petitions submitted by Sierra Club 

requesting that EPA object to CAA Title 

V permits issued by the Georgia 

Environmental Protection Division for 

Georgia Power Company’s Scherer 

Steam-Electric Generating Plant, 

Hammond Steam-Electric Generating 

Plant, Wansley Steam-Electric 

Generating Plant, Kraft Steam-Electric 

Generating Plant, and McIntosh SteamElectric Generating Plant. The proposed 

consent decree would establish 

deadlines for EPA to take such actions. 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed consent decree must be 

received by March 20, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OGC–2014–0150, online at 

www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred 

method); by email to oei.docket@

epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; 

or by hand delivery or courier to EPA 

Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 

1301 Constitution Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 

4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. Comments on 

a disk or CD–ROM should be formatted 

in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use 

of special characters and any form of 

encryption, and may be mailed to the 

mailing address above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen Bennett Bianco, Air and 

Radiation Law Office (2344A), Office of 

General Counsel, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; 

telephone: (202) 564–3298; fax number: 

(202) 564–5603; email address: 

bennett.karen@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Consent Decree 

The proposed consent decree would 

resolve a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club 

seeking to compel the Administrator to 

take actions under CAA sections 

110(k)(2), (3) and 505(b)(2). Under the 

terms of the proposed consent decree, 

EPA would agree to sign a notice of final 

rulemaking to approve, disapprove, or 

approve in part and disapprove in part 

Georgia’s July 20, 2010 SIP Submittal 

addressing Georgia Rule for Air Quality 

391–3–1-.02(uuu) (‘‘GA SIP’’) no later 

than November 16, 2016, unless Georgia 

withdraws its July 20, 2010 SIP 

submittal. The proposed consent decree 

also states that no later than April 14, 

2014, EPA shall sign its response 

granting or denying the Sierra Club 

petitions regarding Georgia Power 

Company’s Scherer Steam-Electric 

Generating Plant, Permit No. 4911–207– 

0008–V–03–0, Hammond Steam-Electric 

Generating Plant, Permit No. 4911–115– 

0003–V–03–0, Wansley Steam-Electric 

Generating Plan, Permit No. 4911–149– 

0001–V–03–0, Kraft Steam-Generating 

Plant, Permit No. 4911–051–0006–V– 

03–0, and McIntosh Steam-Electric 

Generating Plant, Permit No. 4911–103– 

0003–V–03–0, pursuant to section 

505(b)(2) of the CAA. 

Under the terms of the proposed 

consent decree, EPA will deliver notice 

of each action to the Office of the 

Federal Register for review and 

publication within 15 business days of 

signature. In addition, the proposed 

consent decree outlines the procedure 

for the Plaintiff to request costs of 

litigation, including attorney fees. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree from persons who are 

not named as parties or intervenors to 

the litigation in question. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the proposed 

consent decree if the comments disclose 

facts or considerations that indicate that 

such consent is inappropriate, 

improper, inadequate, or inconsistent 

with the requirements of the Act. Unless 

EPA or the Department of Justice 

determines that consent to this consent 

decree should be withdrawn, the terms 

of the consent decree will be affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed Consent 

Decree 

A. How can I get a copy of the consent 

decree? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2014–0150) contains a 

copy of the proposed consent decree. 

The official public docket is available 

for public viewing at the Office of 

Environmental Information (OEI) Docket 

in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OEI 

Docket is (202) 566–1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through 

www.regulations.gov. You may use 

www.regulations.gov to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and access those 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search’’. 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 32 / Tuesday, February 18, 2014 / Notices 9205 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at www.regulations.gov 

without change, unless the comment 

contains copyrighted material, CBI, or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do i submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an email 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the www.regulations.gov Web 

site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, email address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an email comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address is automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the official public 

docket, and made available in EPA’s 

electronic public docket. 

Dated: February 7, 2014. 

Lorie J. Schmidt, 

Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2014–03427 Filed 2–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Information Collection Being Reviewed 

by the Federal Communications 

Commission 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of an effort to 

streamline the process to seek feedback 

from the public on service delivery, the 

Federal Communications Commission 

(FCC) has submitted a Generic 

Information Collection Request to OMB 

for approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

3501–3520). The FCC invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; and ways to 

minimize the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. The FCC may 

not conduct or sponsor a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

No person shall be subject to any 

penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that 

does not display a valid OMB control 

number. 

DATES: Written Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) comments should be 

submitted on or before April 21, 2014. 

If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting PRA comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the FCC contact listed below as 

soon as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments 

to Walter Boswell, Federal 

Communications Commission, via the 

Internet at walter.boswell@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Walter Boswell, Office of Managing 

Director, (202) 418–2178 or by email at 

walter.boswell@fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1149. 

Title: Generic Clearance for the 

Collection of Qualitative Feedback on 

Agency Service Delivery. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Individuals or 

households, business or other for-profit, 

not-for-profit institutions, and state, 

local, or tribal government. 

Number of Respondents: 259,600. 

Estimated Time per Response: .166 

hours (10 minutes). 

Frequency of Response: On time 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Voluntary. 

Total Annual Burden: 43,267 hours. 

Total Annual Costs: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

Responses to feedback instruments will 

be confidential. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: The information 

collection activity will garner 

qualitative customer and stakeholder 

feedback in an efficient, timely manner, 

in accordance with the Administration’s 

commitment to improving service 

delivery. By qualitative feedback we 

mean information that provides useful 

insights on perceptions and opinions, 

but are not statistical surveys that yield 

quantitative results that can be 

generalized to the population of study. 

This feedback will provide insights into 

customer or stakeholder perceptions, 

experiences and expectations, provide 

an early warning of issues with service, 

or focus attention on areas where 

communication, training or change in 

operations might improve delivery of 

products or services. These collections 

will allow for ongoing, collaborative and 

actionable communications between the 

Agency and its customers and 

stakeholders. It will also allow feedback 

to contribute directly to the 

improvement of program management. 

Feedback collected under this generic 

clearance will provide useful 

information, but it will not yield data 

that can be generalized to the overall 

population. This type of generic 

clearance for qualitative information 

will not be used for quantitative 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES