alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN JOSE GADIDAS GONZALEZ,

AKA Mario Rodas Diaz, 

Petitioner,

 v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting

Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-70240

Agency No. A029-249-349

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 13, 2018

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,** District

Judge.

 

Petitioner Juan Gadidas Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions for review of the BIA’s denial, on credibility grounds, of asylum,

FILED

NOV 30 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for

the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) relief. The

adverse credibility finding was based on an inconsistency in the record stemming

from petitioner’s testimony on cross-examination. No recording was made of the

cross-examination. Because the IJ expressly represented that credibility would not

be an issue — indeed, she stated on the record that she “didn't find [Petitioner] to

be incredible” — the parties consented to the IJ reading her notes into the record in

lieu of redoing cross-examination. 

The petitioner’s testimony on cross-examination turned out to be a

determinative issue in the IJ’s decision, but neither the IJ nor the BIA gave the

Petitioner an opportunity to explain, on the record, the inconsistency on which the

adverse credibility determination was based. Rather, Petitioner was misadvised by

the IJ that there would be no need for an explanation because credibility was not a

problem. 

Petitioner was therefore denied the full and fair hearing that due process

requires. See Joseph v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1235, 1244-1245 (9th Cir. 2010);

Campos-Sanchez v. I.N.S., 164 F.3d 448, 450 (9th Cir. 1999).

The deficiencies in the record were adequately raised before the BIA. It

should have required a new cross-examination of the petitioner.

The petition is GRANTED and REMANDED.

The BIA’s decision is therefore VACATED. 

2
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                            Current Report Pursuant
                         to section 13 or 15 (d) of the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)                     12/08/97
 
 
                          The Metal Arts Company, Inc.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 
                                    New York
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State of Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)


          0-9998                                         06-0945588
----------------------------               -----------------------------------
 (Commission file Number)                    I.R.S. Employer Identification No.
 

1 American Center, Geneva , New York                              14456-1188
--------------------------------------------------             --------------
(Address of Principal Executive Office)                           (Zip Code)


 
                                 (315) 789-2200
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)



                                 Not applicable
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



<PAGE>


Item 5. Other Events

         On December 8, 1997 Metal Arts company (the "Company") was notified by
the United States Patent and Trademark Office that a Notice of Allowance had
been granted the Company covering its Microsmooth (TM) formula, an activation
bath for electroless nickel plating, and an Allowance for the process of using
Microsmooth (TM) in plating.

         The Patent will be in force until June 23, 2017.




<PAGE>


                              S I G N A T U R E S

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. 


                                            THE METAL ARTS COMPANY, INC.
                                            (Registrant)

                                            By: /s/ Stanley J. Dahle
                                               ------------------------------
                                               (signature)

Date: January 5, 1998                            Name:   Stanley J. Dahle
                                                 Title:  President
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7957 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7957

To clarify the eligibility of high school students to receive Pandemic 
           Unemployment Compensation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 7, 2020

   Ms. Craig (for herself, Ms. Omar, Mr. Phillips, and Ms. McCollum) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the eligibility of high school students to receive Pandemic 
           Unemployment Compensation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``High School Student Unemployment 
Eligibility Clarification Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2102(a) of the Relief for Workers Affected 
by Coronavirus Act (contained in subtitle A of title II of division A 
of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)(ii)(II), by striking ``and'' at the 
        end;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following:
                    ``(B) includes an individual who meets the criteria 
                described in subparagraph (A) and is a student 
                attending, doing distance learning through, or on 
                vacation from, a secondary school (as defined in 
                section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
                Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)), regardless of whether 
                the individual is able to accept employment during 
                school hours; and''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be 
effective as if enacted on the date of enactment of the CARES Act 
(Public Law 116-136).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.3

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE



$2,000.00                                                      Las Vegas, Nevada
                                                               02/12/01


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Hunapu, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Maker"), promises
to pay to the order of Putun, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Holder"), PO Box
50464, Henderson, NV, 89016, or at such other address as Holder may designate in
writing, the principal sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000) until paid, at the
rate of six percent (6%) per annum.

The principal amount of the note shall be due and payable on or before 02/11/02.

Should the amount owing on this note not be paid when due, the entire unpaid
principal sum evidenced by this Note will, without notice to the Maker, become
due and payable.

Maker hereby waives presentment of payment, protect and demand, notice of
protest, demand and dishonor and nonpayment of this Note, and consents that the
holder may extend the time of payment or otherwise modify the terms of payment
or any part or whole of the indebtedness evidenced by this Note as the request
of any other person liable hereon, and consent shall not alter nor diminish the
liability of any party hereunder.

Maker may repay the indebtedness evidenced hereby in whole or in part from time
to time without premium or penalty.

As used herein, Holder shall include any subsequent holder of this Note. Maker
shall have no right to assign this Note without the consent of Holder, and in no
event shall any assignment of this Note by Maker act to release Maker from any
obligations hereunder unless such release is evidenced in writing by Holder.

This Note shall be governed by the laws of the State of Nevada.

Witness the hand of the undersigned this 12 day of February 2001.


                                                Hunapu, Inc.

                                                /s/ John C. Francis, President
                                                ------------------------------
FTC’s Proposed Partial Stipulated Order for 

Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment

Attachment 4

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-13 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 2
Information about settlements with: 

The United States and California (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board, California Attorney General); 

the U.S. Federal Trade Commission; and 2.0 Liter VW/Audi TDI car owners and lessees

Month 00, 2016

Dear Jane Smith,

The Court has approved settlements with Volkswagen regarding diesel emissions from 

Volkswagen or Audi 2.0 liter diesel vehicles. If you are eligible, you may submit a claim now. 

Current owners and lessees can choose:

HOW IT WORKS

Visit VWCourtSettlement.com.

Enter your VIN to see if your car 

qualifies and how much 

compensation you will receive. 

You’ll get information 

about your options, 

including the timing.

If you are eligible, you 

can file a claim on the 

site now. 

Includes these 2.0-liter diesel cars:

VWCourtSettlement.com 1-844-98-CLAIM

a buyback of your car 

or early lease termination

if approved by EPA and CARB

a modification to your car 

to improve emissions 

+ cash

OR

VWCourtSettlement.com

Some former owners and lessees are also eligible to receive cash.

Audi A3

2010-2013, 2015

VW Beetle

2013-2015

VW Golf

2010-2015

VW Jetta

2009-2015

VW Passat

2012-2015

Court Approved U.S. Volkswagen / Audi Diesel Emissions Settlement

You can wait until you 

receive more information 

about whether there will be 

a modification available to 

improve emissions from 

your car.

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-13 Filed 06/28/16 Page 2 of 2
No. 129,

Orig.

#### Virginia *v.*Maryland.

Motion of Audubon Naturalist Society for review of the Special Master’s finding of subject matter jurisdiction denied. Motion of Virginia for costs denied without prejudice to refiling before the Special Master. [For earlier order herein, see, *e. g., ante,*p. 922.]
#### Walter N. BONEY et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.

No. N-377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 27, 1971.

*651Greene, Greene & Kennedy, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Howard Hadley and Geoffrey B. Dob-son, Tallahassee, for appellee.

SPECTOR, Chief Judge.

Appellants seek reversal of a final judgment in condemnation, entered subsequent to denial of their motion for new trial and granting appellee’s motion for remittitur. A jury verdict of $5,500 was reduced to an award of $525 upon entry of the remittitur. Appellee sought appellants’ property in the eminent domain proceeding below to acquire land for Interstate Highway 1-295, a limited-access road.

Appellants persuasively argue that severance damages — damages to their remaining land as a result of the taking — are present in this case. Although the taking has deprived them of a right to use one direction of an unopen, undedicated street bordering their property, nevertheless, some right of access, albeit previously unused, has been destroyed. We feel the facts below require application of the rule of law recognized in Benerofe v. State Road Department, 210 So.2d 28, 30 (Fla.App.1968):

> “ * * * [WJhere a limited access is taken, the abutting property owners are entitled to compensation for the destruction of their previously-existing right of access. Anhoco Corporation v. Dade County, 144 So.2d 793, (Fla.1962).”

See also Glessner v. Duval County, 203 So.2d 330 (Fla.App.1967). ,

It is apparent from the argumentation reflected in the briefs that the entry of the remittitur about which appellant complains was predicated upon the trial court’s belief that there was no severance damage to the remainder of appellants’ land after the taking; and, hence, the jury verdict before us was required to be limited to the actual value of the land taken. Application of the rule cited above from the Benerofe case impels the contrary conclusion. Thus, the entry of the remittitur effectively took away the jury’s right to award appellants severance damages resulting from the destruction of the previously existing right of access. When viewed in this light, entry of the remittitur was error.

Therefore, the final judgment in condemnation and the order of remittitur must be reversed and this cause remanded with directions to reinstate the jury verdict of $5,500. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed. We have considered appellants’ remaining points and find them to be without merit.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
January 28, 2020 | Washington, DC

12:30 pm Introductions

Min Hee Kim

Federal Trade Commission, Office of Technology Research & Investigation

Opening Remarks

Rohit Chopra

Federal Trade Commission, Commissioner

12:45 pm Presentation: The State of Voice Cloning Technology

Patrick Traynor

John and Mary Lou Dasburg Preeminence Chair in Engineering, Herbert Wertheim 

College of Engineering, University of Florida

1:10 pm Panel One: The Positives and Negatives of Voice Cloning

John Costello

Director, Augmentative Communication Program, Boston Children’s Hospital 

Rebecca Damon

Executive Vice President, SAG-AFTRA

Rupal Patel

CEO & Founder, VocaliD INC

Mona Sedky

Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Computer Crime & Intellectual Property 

Section

Christine Todaro 

Moderator, FTC Division of Marketing Practices

2:25 pm Break
2:40 pm Panel Two: The Ethics of Voice Cloning

Rosalyn W. Berne 

Director, Center for Engineering Ethics and Society, National Academy of 

 Engineering 

Leigh Hafrey 

Senior Lecturer, MIT Sloan School of Management 

Ashish Jaiman 

Director of Technology and Operations for Microsoft’s Defending Democracy 

program

Kirsten Martin

Chair, Department of Strategic Management & Public Policy, George Washington 

University School of Business 

Dan Salsburg

Moderator, FTC Office of Technology Research & Investigation

3:40 pm Break

3:50 pm Panel Three: Authentication, Detection, and Mitigation

John Amein

Vice President, ID R&D 

Neil Johnson

Science & Engineering Technical Advisor contractor, Defense Advanced Research 

Projects Agency (DARPA)

Siwei Lyu

Professor, Department of Computer Science, and Director of Computer Vision and 

Machine Learning Lab (CVML), University at Albany, State University of New York

Patrick Traynor

John and Mary Lou Dasburg Preeminence Chair in Engineering, Herbert Wertheim 

College of Engineering, University of Florida

Will Maxson

Moderator, FTC Division of Marketing Practices

4:45 pm Closing Remarks

Lois Greisman

Associate Director, FTC, Division of Marketing Practices
#### Hart WATSON et al., Appellants, v. Roy H. SEIDEL et al., Appellees.

No. 70-35.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
In the Matter of 

UNITED ST A TES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

RagingWire Data Centers, Inc., 

a corporation, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

Docket No. 9386 

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

Pursuant to Commission Rule 3 .21 (b ), which requires a scheduling conference 

within ten days after the Answer is filed by the last answering Respondent, the initial 

scheduling conference will be held on December 5, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. in Room 532, 

Federal Trade Commission Building, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC. 

The pa1iies are directed to meet before the scheduling conference and to comply 

with Commission Rule 3.21(a) and (b). The expected scheduling order will be provided 

to the patties in advai1ce of the scheduling conference. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chap~ell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: November 25, 2019
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 14, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 8, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 441 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-164, CP2018-235.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-12745 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### KOBRIN BUILDERS SUPPLY, INC., Appellant, v. Bradley B. BARNES et al., Appellees.

No. 70-426.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Ronald S. BROADWAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-242.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 6, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Robert C. Parker, Jr., Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 1, 2019














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐











Item 2.02    Results of Operations and Financial Condition





Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the "Company") has reported its results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2019 , as described in Company's press release dated May 1, 2019 , a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01         Financial Statements and Exhibits





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press release issued by the Registrant dated May 1, 2019.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:May 1, 2019By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer