alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12495]



[[Page 26949]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-11-2018)


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 23--Buffalo, New York; Authorization of 
Proposed Production Activity; Panasonic Eco Solutions Solar New York 
America; Subzone 23E (Solar Panels/Modules); Buffalo, New York

    On February 5, 2018, Panasonic Eco Solutions Solar New York America 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board for its facility within Subzone 23E, in Buffalo, New York.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (83 FR 6161, February 13, 2018). On 
June 5, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision 
that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: June 5, 2018.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12495 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2nd. A correction was made to add the “What You 

Should Do” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in 

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2, 2015

Mr. Brian Carter

736 W Rosslynn Avenue

Fullerton, CA 92832

Dear Mr. Carter:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 30, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0844), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### D. C. FLORIDA PROPERTIES ASSOCIATION, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Appellant, v. INDIAN LAKE MAINTENANCE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-950.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 8, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit (12)(a)** **WACHOVIA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES****COMPUTATIONS OF CONSOLIDATED RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                                    ***Nine***          ***Months***          ***Ended***  *Years Ended December 31,*       ***September 30,***                *(In millions)*     ***2007***  *2006*  *2005*  *2004*  *2003*  *2002*  **EXCLUDING INTERESTON DEPOSITS**                            Pretax income from continuingoperations     $**9,007**   11,470   9,462   7,633   6,080   4,667 Fixed charges, excluding capitalizedinterest      **8,523**   8,189   4,971   2,701   2,309   2,414  Earnings   **(A****)**   $**17,530**   19,659   14,433   10,334   8,389   7,081  Interest, excluding interest on deposits     $**8,293**   7,897   4,711   2,474   2,113   2,247 One-third of rents      **230**   292   260   227   196   167 Capitalized interest      **-**   -   -   -   -   -  Fixed charges (a)   **(B****)**   $**8,523**   8,189   4,971   2,701   2,309   2,414  Consolidated ratios of earnings tofixed charges, excluding intereston deposits   **(A)/(B)**    **2.06**X  2.40   2.90   3.83   3.63   2.93  **INCLUDING INTERESTON DEPOSITS**                            Pretax income from continuingoperations     $**9,007**   11,470   9,462   7,633   6,080   4,667 Fixed charges, excluding capitalizedinterest      **18,051**   17,308   10,268   5,554   4,669   5,844  Earnings   **(C****)**   $**27,058**   28,778   19,730   13,187   10,749   10,511  Interest, including interest on deposits     $**17,821**   17,016   10,008   5,327   4,473   5,677 One-third of rents      **230**   292   260   227   196   167 Capitalized interest      **-**   -   -   -   -   -  Fixed charges (a)   **(D****)**   $**18,051**   17,308   10,268   5,554   4,669   5,844  Consolidated ratios of earnings tofixed charges, including intereston deposits   **(C)/****(D)**    **1.50**X  1.66   1.92   2.37   2.30   1.80  (a) Fixed charges do not include: 1) other obligations which exist under Financial AccountingStandards Board Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements forGuarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others,” and 2) interest on uncertainincome tax positions.
#### Milton E. RUTLEDGE v. TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES, et al.

No. 60395.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 1977.

In re: Milton E. Rutledge, applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied. Petitioner’s complaint that he has not been afforded a speedy trial is groundless. Return to this Court indicates that the State is not retarding trial but rather proceeding with attempts at extradition, petitioner having chosen not to waive extradition proceedings.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7899 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7899

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide an incentive for 
   households participating in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
 program to purchase certain nutritious fruits and vegetables that are 
                       beneficial to good health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2020

 Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Ms. Moore, Mr. Ryan, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. 
 Cicilline, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Grijalva, Mrs. Watson Coleman, 
Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Norton, Ms. DeLauro, Ms. Kaptur, Ms. 
   McCollum, Mr. Amodei, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Case, Mrs. Hayes, and Ms. 
   Pingree) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide an incentive for 
   households participating in the supplemental nutrition assistance 
 program to purchase certain nutritious fruits and vegetables that are 
                       beneficial to good health.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SNAP Healthy Incentives Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Definition.--Section 3 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 
U.S.C. 2012) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (k) by inserting ``, unless the context 
        specifies otherwise,'' after ``means'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (u) and (v) as subsections 
        (v) and (w), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (t) the following:
    ``(u) `Supplemental fruits and vegetables' means those fruits and 
vegetables containing nutrients that promote the health of the 
population served by the supplemental nutrition assistance program, as 
determined by the Secretary by rule.''.
    (b) Increase in Value of Allotment.--Section 8 of the Food and 
Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2017) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:
    ``(g) Increase in Value of Allotment.--The value of an allotment, 
determined under this section without regard to this subsection and 
issued to a household for a month, shall be increased by 30 percent of 
the cost of supplemental fruits and vegetables purchased by such 
household during such month, but not to exceed an aggregate monthly 
amount determined by the Secretary on the basis of household size.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
October 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32


    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kenneth S. Forster, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2009 of APC Group,
Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of APC Group, Inc.

Date:  August 17, 2009

By:  /S/ KENNETH S. FORSTER
     -----------------------
     Kenneth S. Forster,
     Chief Executive Officer, and
     Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STB SYSTEMS, INC. INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                       332
<INVENTORY>                                     27,148
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,948
<PP&E>                                           9,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,011
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,629
<SALES>                                        180,155
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,155
<CGS>                                          144,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  144,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,263
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
        

</TABLE>
258 La. 365

#### Jack P. F. GREMILLION, Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, For the Use and Benefit of Nola Mae Wittier McFILLEN v. J. B. LANCASTER, Legislative Auditor for the State of Louisiana.

No. 51332.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General for the State of Louisiana for the use and benefit of Ñola Mae Wittier McFillen applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 244 So.2d 864.

Writ denied. No error of law.
#### Mrs. Mona SEWELL v. ARGONAUT SOUTHWEST INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 61668.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: Mrs. Mona Sewell applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of *1003Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Natchitoches. 338 So.2d 1208, 355 So.2d 585.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1997 (Unaudited) and the Consolidated
Statement of OPerations for the Year Ended December 31, 1997 (Unaudited)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000865084
<NAME> OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,141
<SECURITIES>                                   635,743
<RECEIVABLES>                                  290,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,129,576
<PP&E>                                         273,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                 125,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,397,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,048,773
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           795
<OTHER-SE>                                     348,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,397,989
<SALES>                                      4,179,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,240,146
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,916,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (431,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (140,323)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (291,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (291,288)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.70)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. David WATERS v. Henry MATTHEW, Clerk of Court, Parish of Webster.

No. 60366.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: David Waters applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. Applicants’ conviction was affirmed on appeal under the style *State v. Jenkins et al.,*La., 340 So.2d 157, in 1976, and his transcript can be of no further help on appeal.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      19,420,537
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 29,069,224
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,742,794
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,740,062
<LOANS>                                    279,680,134
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,525,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             347,904,023
<DEPOSITS>                                 285,312,541
<SHORT-TERM>                                30,100,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,919,984
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    17,728,564
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,842,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              29,571,498
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             25,540,073
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,441,512
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                94,577
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            28,076,162
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,636,988
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,336,949
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       21,739,213
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                2,110,138
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (10,619)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             15,026,645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,010,961
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  10,010,961
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,238,461
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    582,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    40,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,635,820
<CHARGE-OFFS>                              (1,399,142)
<RECOVERIES>                                   178,369
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,525,185
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,525,185
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair

Noah Joshua Phillips

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter

Christine S. Wilson

FTC Matter No. P162318

RESOLUTION DIRECTING USE OF COMPULSORY 

PROCESS REGARDING THE COMPETITIVE IMPACT OF SUPPLY CHAIN 

DISRUPTIONS IN CONSUMER GOODS

Nature and Scope of Matter:

To compile information concerning the impact of supply chain disruptions on 

competition in consumer goods and retail markets, pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Federal Trade 

Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 46(b). 

The Federal Trade Commission hereby resolves and directs that any and all compulsory 

process available to it be used in connection with this inquiry. The Federal Trade Commission 

specifically authorizes the filing or continuation of actions to enforce any such compulsory 

process after the expiration of the three-year period.

Authority to Conduct Investigation:

Sections 6, 9, 10, and 20 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 46, 49, 50, 

and 57b-1, as amended; FTC Procedures and Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 1.1 et seq., and 

supplements thereto. 

By direction of the Commission. 

April J. Tabor

Secretary

DATED:
#### James CHAVERS, Jr. v. STATE.

6 Div. 211.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Aug. 29, 1978.

PER CURIAM.

After remandment by the Supreme Court of Alabama, REVERSED AND REMANDED on authority of the Supreme Court, 77-55 (April, 1978), 361 So.2d 1106.

All the Judges concur.
No. 10446.

#### James *v.*The New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad Co.

Decided April 28, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Ashtabula county.

*Messrs. Anderson, McNab & Anderson; Mr. A. W. Jones*and *Mr. Charles Lawyer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. John H. Clarke*and *Messrs. Hoyt, Munsell & Hall,*for defendant in error.

Final

judgment rendered by the circuit court is reversed, and the judgment of said court reversing *415the judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed on the ground that the judgment of reversal involved the weight of the evidence. Cause remanded.

Spiauck, C. J., Price, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Ginger Lee KING, Appellant, v. Robert Bruce KING, Jr., Appellee.

No. 68-583.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Aug. 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21.1


Name of Subsidiary                                 Jurisdiction of Incorporation


Actar Airforce, Inc.                                       Canada

Coast Medical, Inc.                                        Delaware

EchoCath, Inc.                                             New Jersey
                                                          (20% owned)

HealthStar Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.                   Delaware

Mediziv Medical Products, Inc.                             Israel

Thomas Medical Products, Inc.                              Pennsylvania

Vital Signs California                                     California

Vital Signs Sales Corporation                              Delaware

Vital Signs GmbH                                           Germany

Vital Signs Limited                                        United Kingdom

Vital Signs MN, Inc.
         (formerly Biomedical
          Dynamics Corporation)                            Minnesota

Vital Signs (N) FDM BBO                                    Malaysia