alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

FTC DOCKET NO. D09418

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE:D. MICHAEL CHAPPELL

CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

IN THE MATTER OF: 

MILTON PINEDA

REQUEST BY PARTY TO WITHDRAW

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

Appellant, Milton Pineda, who filed an Application for Review in FTC Docket No. D09418

requests the that the Federal Trade Commission withdraw his Application for Review.

Appellant does not wish to continue with this matter at this time and accepts the offer of 

the Horseracing Integrity and Safety Authority to accept the withdrawal of his prior admission and 

re-initiate the Arbitration Procedures before the ADMC Program’s Arbitral Body.

DATED: October 25, 2023 Respectfully Submitted,

Darrell J. Vienna (CA SBN 173694)

5256 S. Mission Rd., Ste. 703-808 

Bonsall, CA 92003

Telephone 626.590.9999

Facsimile 626.470-9973

/s/ Darrell J. Vienna

Darrell J. Vienna

horselawyer@gmail.com

Carlo Fisco (CA SBN 166274)

P.O. Box 2554

Culver City, CA 90231-2554 

Telephone 310.390.3311

/s/ Carlo Fisco

Carlo Fisco

cfisco@aol.com

PUBLIC

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/26/2023 OSCAR NO 608833 | PAGE Page 1 of 2 * -PUBLIC 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Pursuant to 16 CFR 1.146(a) and 16 CFR 4.4(b), a copy of the forgoing is being served this

25th day of October 2023 via First Class mail and electronic mail upon the following:

April Tabor

Office of the Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington. DC 20580

Via e-mail to: electronicfilings@ftc.gov

Hon. D. Michael Chappell Chief 

Administrative Law Judge

Office of Administrative Law Judges 

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20580

Via e-mail to: oalj@ftc.gov

Bryan Beauman

Rebecca Price

HISA Enforcement Counsel

333 W. Vine Street, Suite 1500

Lexington, KY 40507

Via e-mail to: bbeauman@sturgillturner.com

Via e-mail to: rprice@sturgillturner.com

PUBLIC

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 10/26/2023 OSCAR NO 608833 | PAGE Page 2 of 2 * -PUBLIC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        69907000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      1499170000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                              59160000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 81000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  525745000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                        30722000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                          31680000
<LOANS>                                     1282049000
<ALLOWANCE>                                   18942000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2047930000
<DEPOSITS>                                  1762291000
<SHORT-TERM>                                  53914000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           21719000
<LONG-TERM>                                       2000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      10352000
<OTHER-SE>                                   199654000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               210006000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               28119000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              8492000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              36611000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            15575000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            16317000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         20294000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   717000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (4000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               13890000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               11126000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    11126000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7185000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.48
<LOANS-NON>                                    9464000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   3884000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                127000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 860000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              19103000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  1048000
<RECOVERIES>                                    170000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             18942000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          18942000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                       12831000
        

</TABLE>
p130267.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0267

Focus Ready Draft 3/11/2013

ENGINEER: Austin \ AH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: Croda, Inc.

 

MSDS: No Label: No

TLV/PEL:

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (02/20/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P2B3T1

Health: 1 Low concern

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1ppb), XB

Testing (Testing desired)

Page 1
p130267.eng

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: NR

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0267

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 10

unknown site(s)

Days/yr: 200

Page 2
p130267.eng

Process Description: 

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. Submission states all process wastes

are landfilled. Due to uncertainty at non-submitter

controlled sites, these potential releases are assessed

to uncertain media (water, incineration, or land) as

conservative. PMN substance is a waxy solid, no dusting

will occur.

Incineration or Landfill

Output 2: 1.5E+1 kg/site-day over 2 days/yr from 10 sites

or 3.0E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

3.0E+2 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 0

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:

Page 3
APPENDIX B

SUMMARY OF NICC SECTION 333 EXEMPTION REQUEST

For publication in the Federal Register, NICC hereby provides pursuant to Part 11 a summary of 

its exemption application to allow commercial operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional 

unmanned aircraft for purposes of taking aerial imagery to graphically show the results of 

ongoing agricultural research and demonstration projects on the college’s land and surrounding 

areas. An exemption is requested from the following regulations:

14 C.F.R. § 61.113(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. § 61.133(a);

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a);

14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c);

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a);

14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a);

14 C.F.R. § 91.407(a)(1);

14 C.F.R. § 91.409(a)(2);

14 C.F.R. § 91.417(a) & (b)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson 

Alvaro Martín Bedoya 

In the Matter of 

HomeAdvisor, Inc., a corporation, 

d/b/a Angi Leads, DOCKET NO. 9407 

d/b/a HomeAdvisor Powered by Angi. 

SECOND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OPPOSE 

MOTION FOR SUMMARY DECISION 

On April 22, 2022, the Commission granted Respondent HomeAdvisor, Inc.’s motion to 

extend until May 27, 2022 the time for Respondent to oppose Complaint Counsel’s motion for 

summary decision. Respondent sought that extension so that it could serve subpoenas on and 

take depositions of individuals who submitted declarations in support of Complaint Counsel’s 

motion. See 16 C.F.R. § 3.24(a)(3). Respondent now seeks an additional 10-day extension. 

Respondent asserts that the limited availability of certain third-party witnesses and the timing of 

certain third-party declarants’ document productions have resulted in depositions being 

scheduled up until just two days before the current deadline for their opposition. Respondent 

represents that Complaint Counsel, as a professional courtesy, do not oppose the requested 

extension. 

Under Commission Rule 4.3(b), the Commission may for good cause shown extend any 

time limit prescribed in the Rules. 16 C.F.R. § 4.3(b). In light of the timing of Respondent’s 

third-party discovery and the relatively short length of the requested extension, the Commission 

finds good cause to grant the extension to allow Respondent to complete its depositions and 

prepare its opposition. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of 

Time to Oppose Motion for Summary Decision, filed May 23, 2022, is GRANTED. The 

1 
deadline for submission of Respondent’s opposition to Complaint Counsel’s motion for 

summary decision shall be 5:00 pm EDT on June 6, 2022. 

By the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

SEAL: 

ISSUED: May 26, 2022 

2
MALONE                              Registered, Public Company Accounting
      & BAILEY INC.                       Oversight Board American Institute
      CERTIFIED PUBLIC                    of CPAs, Center for Audit Quality
      ACCOUNTANTING FIRM                  Texas Society of Certified
                                          Public Accountants





August 13, 2009


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549

         RE:        APC Group, Inc.
         File No.:  000-52789

We have read the statements under Item 4.01 of the Current Report on Form 8-K to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2009
regarding the change of auditors. We agree with all statements pertaining to us.

We have no basis to agree or disagree with statements pertaining to the
successor accountants.

/s/Malone & Bailey, PC
----------------------
www.malone-bailey.com
Houston, Texas






www.malone-bailey.com - 2925 Briarpark Drive, Suite 930 -- Houston, TX 77042
                                              o. 713.343.4200 -- f. 713.266.1815
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7840 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7840

  To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2020

 Mr. McHenry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Blue Ridge National Heritage Area, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blue Ridge National Heritage Area 
Reauthorization Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE BLUE RIDGE NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    The Blue Ridge National Heritage Area Act of 2003 (54 U.S.C. 320101 
note; Public Law 108-108; 117 Stat. 1274; 131 Stat. 461; 132 Stat. 661; 
133 Stat. 778) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        to carry out this section $1,000,000 for each fiscal year.''; 
        and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``subsection 
                (a)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``2021'' and inserting 
        ``2036''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.0

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

This
certification is given by the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Cascade Bancorp (the registrant) pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,
with respect to the registrants annual report of Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), that:

|1. |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
  Company.

|/s/ Patricia L. Moss                  |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|Patricia L. Moss                      | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                      | 
|                                      | 
|/s/ Gregory D. Newton                 |  | 
|Gregory D. Newton                     | 
|Executive Vice President and          | 
|Chief
      Financial Officer         | 

|Dated: | March 5, 2008 |  | 
|------ | ------------- |  | 

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

March 16, 2023

Via FedEx

[Company/Counsel]

[Address]

[City, State Zip]

Dear [Company/Counsel]:

Enclosed is an Order to File Special Report (“Order”) issued by the Federal Trade 

Commission pursuant to Section 6 of the FTC Act. The Order seeks information 

regarding [your company’s/your client’s] (hereinafter “you” or “your”) Social Media and 

Video Streaming Platform(s), including regarding your advertising review and 

monitoring practices to detect, prevent, and reduce deceptive commercial advertising, 

including related to fraudulent health-care products, financial scams, and the sale of fake 

goods, and any means that you use to aid consumers in distinguishing advertising and 

other commercial messages from other types of content on those services. 

We would like to confer by telephone with you or your designated counsel by no 

later than March 30, 2023, to discuss the timing and format of your submission. Please 

carefully review the Order prior to that teleconference, including all definitions and 

instructions, and consider the availability of the requested data and information. To 

facilitate production and review of the responses, we provide specific directions for 

submission of the data by electronic format.

Submissions responsive to this Order that are marked “confidential” will not be 

disclosed without first giving you ten (10) days’ notice of the Commission’s intention to 

do so, except as provided in Sections 6(f) and 21 of the FTC Act. Confidential or 

privileged commercial or financial information will be reported only on an aggregate or 

anonymous basis, consistent with Sections 6(f) and 21(d) of the FTC Act.

In addition to the above request, we also would be happy to consider any 

additional information you consider relevant to this inquiry. If you have any questions 

about the issuance of this Order or your filing of a Special Report to the FTC, please 

contact Laura Sullivan (202-326-3327, lsullivan@ftc.gov) or Rafael Reyneri (202-326-

3026, rreyneri@ftc.gov).

Very truly yours,

April J. Tabor

Secretary
Mr. Tekniepe, 

I have received the hard copies of the Ozone Redesignation Request, and I concur with these plans. I 

hope this helps out the effort. 

On Nov 2, 2012 9:35 AM, "Robert Tekniepe" <Tekniepe@clarkcountynv.gov> wrote: 

Mr. Tso, 

 

Per our telephone conversation, if you concur with the EPA’s recommendation for approval of the 

Clark County Ozone request for Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan could you please reply 

to myself and those I have cc’d at EPA Region IX and Clark County Air Quality stating “I concur.” 

 

Thanks for all your help. Also, personally thank Mark for his efforts. 

 

Robert Tekniepe, Ph.D. 

Principal Management Analyst 

Clark County Department of Air Quality 

702.455.4063 

Re: Concurrence to Request Approval of the Ozone Plan 

Benny Tso 

to: 

Robert Tekniepe 

11/05/2012 08:20 AM 

Cc: 

Karina OConnor, Ginger Vagenas, Dennis Ransel, Lewis Wallenmeyer 

Hide Details 

From: Benny Tso <btso@lvpaiute.com>

To: Robert Tekniepe <Tekniepe@clarkcountynv.gov>, 

Cc: Karina OConnor/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Ginger Vagenas/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Dennis 

Ransel <RANSEL@clarkcountynv.gov>, Lewis Wallenmeyer 

<Wallenmeyer@clarkcountynv.gov>

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Users\gvagenas\AppData\Local\Temp\notes5524D1\~web1748.htm 12/5/2012
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30593

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LANCE EVERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

No. 2:07-CR-118-1

Before SMITH, GARZA, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lance Everson appeals his guilty-plea conviction, arguing that the district

court abused its discretion by denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his moUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 9, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30593

2

tion to withdraw his plea. A decision not to hold a hearing on a motion to withdraw is reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Powell, 354 F.3d 362,

370 (5th Cir. 2003). 

Although a defendant is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a motion

to withdraw, “a hearing is required when the defendant alleges sufficient facts

which, if proven, would justify relief.” Id. (internal quotation and citation omitted). Everson’s motion was brought under FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(d)(2), which permits withdrawal after a plea has been entered and before sentencing if the defendant shows a “fair and just reason” based on the totality of the circumstances.

Id. (citing United States v. Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 343-44 (5th Cir. 1984)). 

Absent the inferences Everson asks the courts to draw from the allegations

in his motion, he did not offer sufficient facts to justify withdrawal of the plea;

he presented only a belated motion based on the vague assertion of the reappearance of a potential witness. The court thus did not abuse its discretion. Powell,

354 F.3d at 370.

Further, Everson has not shown that he would be entitled to relief under

the totality of the Carr factors. In evaluating a motion to withdraw, no single

Carr factor is determinative; instead, the court makes its decision based on the

totality of the circumstances. See United States v. Badger, 925 F.2d 101, 104

(5th Cir. 1991). “The rationale for allowing a defendant to withdraw a guilty

plea is to permit him to undo a plea that was unknowingly made at the time it

was entered. The purpose is not to allow a defendant to make a tactical decision

to enter a plea, wait several weeks, and then obtain a withdrawal if he believes

that he made a bad choice in pleading guilty.” Carr, 740 F.2d at 345. Because

Everson has failed to show that any of the Carr factors favored withdrawal, the

refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing, even if error, was thus also harmless. See

Powell, 354 F.3d at 370-71. 

The judgment of conviction is AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 6-K

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
                    PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 UNDER
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                         FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER, 2013

                       COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-29832




                             CHELSEA OIL & GAS LTD.
                (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                              3200, 500 4TH AVENUE
                           CALGARY, AB CANADA T2P 2V6
                    (Address of principal executive office)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

         Form 20-F  X             Form 40-F

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

         Yes                      No  X

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- .

The information contained in Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 of this Form 6-K is
incorporated by reference as additional exhibits to the registrant's
registration statement on Form S-8: File No. 333-153684.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                                   CHELSEA OIL & GAS LTD.

Date:    October 18, 2013 By:                      /s/ JESSE MEIDL
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Name:    Jesse Meidl
                                                   Title:   Director






<PAGE>
                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO. DESCRIPTION

                    99.1 Press Release

                    99.2 Press Release