alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable Anthony Foxx

Secretary of Transportation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

The Honorable Penny S. Pritzker

Secretary of Commerce

U.S. Department of Commerce

1401 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20230

The Honorable John Kerry

Secretary of State

U.S. Department of State

2201 C Street, NW

Washington, DC 20520

Re: Dockets No. DOS-2015-0016, DOT-OST-2015-0082, and DOC-2015-0001

Dear Secretaries Foxx, Pritzker and Kerry:

As you are aware, promoting positive cross-border economic activity and social connections is 

crucial to the United States’ role as a global leader. That is why I am writing on behalf of the 

East African Chamber of Commerce in support of the Open Skies agreements between the 

United States and the Gulf States.

With hundreds of thousands of East Africans residing in the United States, the East African

Chamber of Commerce understands how important it is to promote free trade, investments and 

travel between our regions. Through our work, we aim to increase network and visibility among 

East African-owned businesses in America and foster their connection to their local communities 

and our home region.

Our goals can only be accomplished, however, through easy entry and affordable routes between 

the United States and East Africa. The Open Skies agreements with our member countries, 

including Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda and Rwanda, have facilitated access to local East African 

communities and helped us bring in jobs, develop businesses and promote overall commerce in 

this country.

We urge you to stand behind the current Open Skies agreements and preserve unrestricted access 

to the United States from the Gulf States so that the citizens of that region can continue to travel 

to our country and help foster the American economy like we do. 

Sincerely,

Edwin Karuga
No. 00-326.

#### Trustees for the Michigan Carpenters Council Pension Fund et al. *v.*W. W. A., Inc.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Elbert GOWERS v. E. D. GOUR et al.

No. 61096.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1977.

In re: E. D. Gour et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bienville. 350 So.2d 935.

Denied.
#### FMC CORPORATION v. CONTINENTAL GRAIN CO.

No. 61003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Continental Grain Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Jefferson. 355 So.2d 953.

Application withdrawn, parties have amicably settled dispute.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Hongkeung Lam       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Hongkeung Lam           |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   | Dated: March 28, 2011   |   |

----
**EXHIBIT32.01**

 

**Certification ofChief Executive OfficerFurnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Versant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endedOctober 31, 2003, as amended by the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No.1 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, NICK ORDON, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the annualperiod covered by the Report.

 

 
| /s/ Nick  Ordon                        |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| Nick Ordon                             |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |
| Febuary 27,  2004                      |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to VersantCorporation and will be retained by Versant Corporation and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 759 

AN ACT 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development 

on terms that are equal and fair, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 759 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 

3 and Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair 

4 Opportunity Settlement Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

6 The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 

7 Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (Public 

8 Law 100–89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended by adding at the 

9 end the following: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

11 ‘‘Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude 

12 or limit the applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 

13 Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 759 

AN ACT 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic develother purposes. opment on terms that are equal and fair, and for
Exhibit 23.3





CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON





I, Gino Slanzi , state that I am responsible for preparing or supervising the preparation of part(s) of the technical report summary titled "Technical Report Summary, Operation Report, Nueva Victoria" with an effective date of April 5, 2024, as signed, and certified by me (the “Technical Report Summary”).





Furthermore, I state that:





a. I consent to the public filing of the Technical Report Summary by Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (the “Company”) as an exhibit to Form 6-K of the Company (“Form 6-K”);





b. the document that the Technical Report Summary supports is the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2023, and any existing amendments or supplements and/or exhibits thereto (the "Form 20-F") (the Form 6-K and Form 20-F, collectively the “Document”);





c. I consent to the use of my name in the Document, to any quotation from or summarization in the Document of the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible, and to the incorporation by reference of the Technical Report Summary into Form 20-F; and





d. I confirm that I have read the Document, and that the Document fairly and accurately reflects, in the form and context in which it appears, the information in the parts of the Technical Report Summary for which I am responsible.





By/s/ Gino SlanziGino SlanziCEOInprotec SpA





Dated at Santiago, Chile on April 5, 2024
December 1, 2016

Mr. William Russell

President

Logistic Gliders

221 West A Street, #1386

Dixon, CA 95620

Re: FAA-2016-1618

Dear Mr. Russell:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition.

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption.

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dan Ngo

Program Analyst
#### Elizabeth A. BEARER, Appellant, v. J. Kenneth BEARER, Appellee.

No. 70-738.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 15, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Marion E. PETERS, Appellant, v. Melvin J. PETERS, Appellee.

No. 70-217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 6, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Wayne Haywood O’NEIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. K-463.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Aug. 12, 1969.

George G. Phillips, Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and James Robert Yon, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Pitts v. State (Fla.App.1966), 181 So.2d 739.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit3.5**

 

**EXHIBITA**

 

**Certificateof Amendment to Articles of Incorporation**

**ForNevada Profit Corporations**

**(Pursuantto NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)**

 

1.               Name ofCorporation:  OLYMPIC ENTERTAINMENTGROUP, INC.

 

2.               The articles havebeen amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):

 

A.           Article 1 of theArticles of Incorporation is amended to read as follows:

“ARTICLE I,NAME, The name of the corporation shall be: EXAM USA, INC.”

 

B.             Article IV,Section 1, of the Articles of Incorporation, amended August 11, 1994,is amended to read as follows: 

“Section 1.  *AuthorizedShares*.  The authorizedcapital stock of the Corporation is one hundred million (100,000,000) shares ofCommon Stock at a par value of $0.01 per share and shall be voting stock; andfive million (5,000,000) shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value and whichmay be, at the discretion of the Board of Directors, issued in alphanumericseries with the rights and preferences designated at the time of the issue bythe Board of Directors.

 

3.               The vote by whichthe stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exerciseat least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of thevoting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, oras may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation havevoted in favor of the amendment is: 1,800,000 shares of Series E ConvertiblePreferred Stock, representing 95% of the Corporation’s voting power.

 
| 4.               Effective date of  filing (optional): | N/A    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                         |   | (must not be later than  90 days after the certificate is filed) |
|                                                                                                                              |        |  |

 
| 5.               Officer Signature  (required): | /s/ Akinori Hirabayashi              |   | /s/  Haruo Miyano       |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                  | Akinori Hirabayashi,  Vice President |   | Haruo Miyano, Secretary |

 

----
#### In the Matter of STATE ex rel. Thomas H. WATTS v. Donald G. JACKSON, Jr.

No. 4936.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

April 18, 1972.

Silvers & Tanet, Michael Silvers, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas H. Watts and Robert L. Roshto, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee.

Before CHASEZ, GULOTTA, and BAILES, JJ.

BAILES, Judge.

This is an appeal by plaintiff, Donald G. Jackson, Jr., from judgment of the court a quo affirming the decision of the Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control rendered adverse to plaintiff which revoked State Liquor Permit No. 1038 issued to said Donald G. Jackson, Jr., for the year 1971, and which further ordered that no permit be issued for the premises 405 Bourbon Street in the City of New Orleans for a period of one (1) year from March 23, 1971.

The petition for appeal of the Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control order was filed in the Civil District Court of *78Orleans Parish on March 24, 1971 and judgment of that court was rendered on March 30, 1971, affirming the decision of the Board.

We have perused the record and briefs of the parties. While we are firmly convinced that the judgment appealed from is correct and would affirm, the matter is now moot for the reason the 1971 license has now expired by its own term and the period of one year prohibition against issuance of a license for these premises has elapsed. Any judgment of this court would be ineffectual and would serve no useful purpose. See Spinato v. Lowe, 239 La. 604, 119 So.2d 480 (1960); State ex rel. Conforto v. City of New Orleans, La.App., 124 So.2d 155 (1960).

For these reasons, this appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Arthur “Mack” HOLLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal quashed.
#### Billy EMMONS v. Durwood POPE and Marvin Yawn.

No. 45709.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 16, 1970.

Guy C. Faggard, Pascagoula, for appellant.

Wiesenburg & Lockard, Pascagoula, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
### Results of Your Search Each title is linked to the recall involved; they are organized by date with the most recent first. 

## Conduct a New Search

.

Hazard Type: Cadmium Tween Brands Recalls Children's Metal Jewelry Due to High Levels of Cadmium (July 13, 2010) Children's Jewelry Recalled by SmileMakers Due to High Levels of Cadmium (June 30, 2010) McDonald's Recalls Movie Themed Drinking Glasses Due to Potential Cadmium Risk (June 4, 2010) Claire's Recalls Children's Metal Charm Bracelets Due to High Levels of Cadmium (May 10, 2010) CPSC Issues Warning on Children's Winter and Holiday-Themed Charm Bracelets with High Levels of Cadmium (March 11, 2010) FAF Inc. Recalls Children's Necklaces Sold Exclusively at Walmart Stores Due to High Levels of Cadmium (January 29, 2010) Results for Hazard Type Search http://www.cpsc.gov/cgi-bin/haz.asp x

1 of 1 7/5/2012 10:19 A M
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10688

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Aaron Christopher Taylor,

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-96-1

______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Aaron 

Christopher Taylor has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Taylor has filed a response. The 

record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10688 Document: 57-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/02/2024
No. 23-10688

2

Taylor’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to 

consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States 

v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). His motion for appointment of 

new counsel is DENIED as untimely. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 

901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein, as well as Taylor’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10688 Document: 57-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/02/2024
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ronald J. DANIELS.

No. 61068.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1978.

John E. Miller, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1








July 23, 2015Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Stephanie Higgins918-591-5026





ONEOK Partners Declares Quarterly Distribution





TULSA, Okla. – July 23, 2015 – The board of directors of the general partner of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) today declared a quarterly cash distribution of 79 cents per unit, effective for the second quarter 2015, payable Aug. 14, 2015, to unitholders of record as of Aug. 3, 2015.





The distribution remains unchanged from the previous quarter and represents a 4 percent increase compared with the second quarter 2014.





ONEOK Partners has increased its distribution by 98 percent since April 2006, when a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) became the sole general partner.





ONEOK Partners, L.P. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships in the United States and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent, Permian and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a pure-play, publicly traded general partner, which owns 36.8  percent of the overall partnership interest, as of June 30, 2015.





For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners .








###
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): February 21, 2019














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











---







Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition





Registrant has reported its results of operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 , as described in Registrant's press release dated February 21, 2019 , a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.





Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits





Exhibit No.Document99.1Press release issued by the Registrant dated February 21, 2019.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:February 21, 2019By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Albert Blankenship, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
     certify, that:

1.   I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Banker's Store,
     Inc.;

2.   based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in
     order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
     which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
     covered by the report;

3.   based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer
     as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4.   I and the other certifying officers:

          i.   are responsible for establishing and maintaining "disclosure
               controls and procedures" for the issuer;

          ii.  have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
               that material information is made known to them, particularly
               during the period in which the periodic report is being prepared;

          iii. have evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure
               controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
               filing date of the report; and

          iv.  have presented in the report their conclusions about the
               effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
               the required evaluation as of the date;

5.   I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the issuer's
     auditors and to the board of directors:

          i.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
               internal controls which could adversely affect the issuer's
               ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
               and have identified for the issuer's auditors any material
               weaknesses in internal controls; and

          ii.  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
               other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's
               internal controls; and

6.   I and the other certifying officers have indicated in the report whether
     or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
     factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
     date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


/s/ Albert Blankenship
-----------------------

Albert Blankenship,
Chief Financial Officer


October 20, 2003