alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00065

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV

- 2019

- 00043

- JP

Before Basse l, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Womack, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### V ICTOR 

### D UNN 

### , Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### L ANDING AT 

### L ITTLE 

### E LM 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT Appellant’s brief was originally due on April 18, 2019. On that date, we received the “(Temporary) Brief of Appellant,” which contained none of the requi sites listed in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. On April 23, 2019, we notified A ppellant that his brief had not been filed as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecu tion unless , within ten days, A ppellant filed with the court an appellant ’ s brief and a n accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). On May 10, 2 019, Appellant filed a late response that was a duplicate of his first temporary brief

. Because A ppellant has failed to file a compliant brief even after we afforded an opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecuti on. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: May 16, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 779 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 779

  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2019

 Mr. Moolenaar (for himself, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Cole, Mr. Gianforte, Mr. 
Gosar, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Austin 
   Scott of Georgia, Mrs. Walorski, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. 
  Allen, Mr. Young, and Mr. Peterson) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER.

    Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or any Indian tribe, 
        or any enterprise or institution owned and operated by an 
        Indian tribe and located on its Indian lands,'' after 
        ``subdivision thereof,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(15) The term `Indian tribe' means any Indian tribe, 
        band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or community 
        which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and 
        services provided by the United States to Indians because of 
        their status as Indians.
            ``(16) The term `Indian' means any individual who is a 
        member of an Indian tribe.
            ``(17) The term `Indian lands' means--
                    ``(A) all lands within the limits of any Indian 
                reservation;
                    ``(B) any lands title to which is either held in 
                trust by the United States for the benefit of any 
                Indian tribe or Indian or held by any Indian tribe or 
                Indian subject to restriction by the United States 
                against alienation; and
                    ``(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that are 
                within the boundaries of a former reservation (as 
                defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a 
                federally recognized Indian tribe.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Patrick Peter DEVLIN v. STATE.

No. 38081.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 213 So.2d 526.
#### Mrs. Olevia GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 3609.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Oct. 22, 1971.

Earl B. Taylor, Opelousas, for plaintiff-appellant.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by Timothy J. McNamara, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee.

Voorhies, Labbé, Fontenot, Leonard & McGlasson, by W. Gerald Gaudet, Lafayette, for defendant-appellee.

Before SAVOY, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of Johnson et ux. v. Allstate Insurance Company, et al., 254 So.2d 91 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1971), decided this date, the judgment appealed from herein is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Affirmed.
#### ARROWHEAD DEVELOPMENT CORP., Nathan Phillips, Walter Neal and Isidore Roseman, Appellants, v. Richard LOWE and Roger Zona, Appellees.

No. 70-739.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
| Area Code/County             | Count |
|------------------------------|-------|
| 702  Nevada                  | 24065 |
| 725  Nevada                  | 199   |
| 775  Nevada                  | 6948  |
| Carson City (City) Nevada    | 950   |
| Churchill Nevada             | 191   |
| Clark Nevada                 | 26978 |
| Douglas Nevada               | 936   |
| Elko Nevada                  | 340   |
| Esmeralda Nevada             | 8     |
| Eureka Nevada                | 2     |
| Humboldt Nevada              | 145   |
| Lander Nevada                | 10    |
| Lincoln Nevada               | 17    |
| Lyon Nevada                  | 820   |
| Mineral Nevada               | 18    |
| No Zip Code Reported, Nevada | 238   |
| Nye Nevada                   | 686   |
| Pershing Nevada              | 48    |
| Storey Nevada                | 23    |
| Washoe Nevada                | 6958  |
| White Pine Nevada            | 59    |
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                               January 4, 2012

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.    Other Events
----------   --------------------------------------------

     The following is a summary of assets under management as of December 31,
2011 (in millions):


	By Investment Vehicle
	---------------------

Separate Accounts	 	$  3,294
Mutual Funds 			   4,237
Sub-Advised Mutual Funds	     972
Private Investment Funds	     168
                                --------
Total			       	$  8,671

	By Investment Strategy
	----------------------
Small Cap			$    932
Small-Mid Cap		             277
Select				     321
Large Cap 			   4,885
Long-Short		           2,082
Strategic Income		     174
				--------
Total			        $  8,671

                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------


     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: January 4, 2012	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 11.1

Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings

Computation of Earnings Per Share

The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, included in
this report as Exhibit 13.3.

Earnings Per Share

Net Income
/ Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period



|                                    |  |                             |           |      |   |          
|----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                    |  | Three months endedMarch 31,
|                                    |  | 2007                        |           | 2006
|Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |  |                             | 1,528,443 |      |   | 1,528,443
|Net Income                          |  | $                           | 415,396   |      | $ | 600,043  
|Per Share Amount                    |  | $                           | 0.27      |      | $ | 0.39     

No common stock equivalents exist.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000037008
<NAME> FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      20,189,000
<SECURITIES>                                13,263,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,117,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,980,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,549,000
<PP&E>                                     827,552,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (118,408,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             879,932,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       43,568,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 31,736,000
<COMMON>                                    31,618,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 195,640,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               879,932,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            80,354,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               60,284,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,565,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,902,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,397,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,272,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



            906 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code) (the "Act"), each of the undersigned officers
of Axtive Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 30, 2002, (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)) and
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





/s/ Graham C. Beachum II
----------------------------------
Graham C. Beachum II
Chief Executive Officer




/s/ David N. Pilotte
-----------------------------------
David N. Pilotte
Chief Financial Officer


Dated:  November 14, 2002





THE FOREGOING CERTIFICATION IS BEING FURNISHED SOLELY PURSUANT TO
SECTION  906  OF THE ACT AND IS NOT BEING FILED AS  PART  OF  THE
PERIODIC REPORT OR AS A SEPARATE DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT.
ASTM GUIDE TO CARE SYMBOLS

Warning

symbols for

Machine wi Ieundering
cucles = =

hand wash

do nol waah

Sc 700 4a nal teach

cr
aprealis jee

(used wan

Adunional
Instructions.
{in symbols

ben needed sehen nbacied

line dry? or words)

ang ta cry

merimumn 200 1506
temperature (290 F) [00F}
high medium

insect o
Orygenn -.additional instructions

O0QO

low absieam
mowture heat finishing

Move, Phin Fajure dluatrates We aymbole vend for lunaaling and Serewanng namWetOns. ALA MNTLR Mundaring eRe ON Melucte wn order. love eymbale:
hung. BHAching, drying. a8 WORD. 2nd. Oeycleenang matUniONe wciviy orm xa. Acta! ypebaty or warts My bee emt Yai clarty Wap al*ueOnA.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West
Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the three-month period then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical and procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report
dated January 23, 2001, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S.R. Snodgrass A.C.


Wheeling, West Virginia
May 10, 2001
No. 10016.

#### The Toledo, Bowling Green & Southern Traction Co. *v.*McFall.

Decided February 25, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Wood county.

*Messrs. J. A. & E. V. Bope,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. M. McMillen*and *Mr. Edward Beverstock,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First Republic
Corporation of America (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Harry
Bergman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



By: /s/ Harry Bergman
   ---------------------------
Name: Harry Bergman
Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer
June 23, 2004
**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-07707, No. 333-29549, and No. 333-59633) pertaining to the
Cell Genesys, Inc. 1989 Incentive Stock Plan, the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, and the 1998 Incentive Stock Plan, of our report dated January 26, 1999
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cell Genesys, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 30, 1999

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. ("the
Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof ("the  Report"),  I,
Hongkeung Lam, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Hongkeung Lam
---------------------------
Hongkeung Lam
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Dated: March 31, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9979-08-Region 6]


Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption Reissuance--Class I Hazardous 
Waste Injection; U. S. Ecology Texas (USET) Robstown, Texas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a UIC no migration petition 
reissuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a reissuance of an exemption to 
the Land Disposal Restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid 
Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, has 
been granted to USET for two Class I hazardous waste injection wells 
located at their Robstown, Texas facility. The company has adequately 
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the EPA by the petition reissuance 
application and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree 
of certainty, there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from 
the injection zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This 
final decision allows the underground injection by USET of the specific 
restricted hazardous wastes identified in this exemption reissuance, 
into Class I hazardous waste injection wells WDW-278 and WDW-279 until 
December 31, 2030, unless the EPA moves to terminate this exemption or 
other petition condition limitations are reached. Additional conditions 
included in this final decision may be reviewed by contacting the EPA 
Region 6 Ground Water/UIC Section. A public notice was issued March 29, 
2018, and the public comment period closed on May 15, 2018, and no 
comments were received. This decision constitutes final Agency action 
and there is no Administrative appeal. This decision may be reviewed/
appealed in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act.

DATES: This action is effective as of May 18, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition reissuance and all pertinent 
information relating thereto are on file at the following location: 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, Water Division, Safe 
Drinking Water Branch (6WQ-S), 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip Dellinger, Chief Ground Water/
UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-8324.

    Dated: May 18, 2018.
James R. Brown,
Associate Director, Safe Drinking Water Branch.
[FR Doc. 2018-12508 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### Marvin JOHNSON, Jr., Appellant, v. Franklin R. HUSSEY, Appellee.

No. 0-199.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 15, 1971.

Hall, Hartwell, Michaels & Hall, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Woods & Johnston, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record oñ appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending October 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), INeil H. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.         The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

2.         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

    /s/Neil H. Ellis      Neil H. EllisPresident and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

Date: December 15, 2004