alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## ·RENO NEWSPAPERS INC WASI.10E COUl'e.i Y**~ ,rn~p·I"OI1!**  I CQ**;J,J!,~** ;\-"'L.LLf\ 

## Publishers of Reno Gazette-Journal 2011 AUG 

## 24**A~l** 

## 9:**3~** 955 Kuenzli St • P.O. Box 22,000 • Reno, NV 89520 • 775.788.6200 Legal Advertising Office 775.788.6394

WASHOE CO POBOX 11130 RENO NV 89520-0027

STATE OF NEVADA COUNTY OF WASHOE Customer Acct# 349008 PO# PUBLIC HEARING Ad# 1000758749 Legal Ad Cost $155.61

Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That as the legal clerk ofthe Reno Gazette-Journal, a daily newspaper of general circulation published in Reno, Washoe County, State ofNevada, that the notice referenced below has published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper between the dates: 07/20/2011

- 0812212011, for exaet publication dates please see last line of Proof of Publication below. Subscribed and sworn to before me 

## r

....· ......· ..·

..·

...........· ....

## sT,;:cEy

..GOMEs

.........· ..·

..

# 1**~** Notary Public'

w State of Navada**~ ~**  , Appointment RecorOOd In Washoe County**~** :.

.**NO:09.10505.2.Exp~.re Ju~22.2013:** **~"** ""'''''''''

### .. "'''''''',,

### ... ,'''''''''''''''''''''''' ""
,,,,,,,,,,,,

### ..........,. 

# "**~r{\j)j** Signed: 

### -="'J;¥lFl-\lJI

AUG 2:2 

### 2011

Proof of Publication

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WASHOE COlJNTY DISTRICT BOARD OF HEALTH The Washoe County District Board of Health does herehy declare 1:00 p.m., August 25, 20! 1, at the Washoe County Health District Conference Room B (1001 E. Ninth Street, Reno) as the time, date, and place to consider the adoption of an Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (ISIP) for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard for submittal to the U.S. EPA

as a revision to the Washoe County portion of the Nevada I-SIP. Interested persons who may be affected or wish to comment on any action being considered on the above date should appear at the public hearing to submit oral testimony or may address comments, data, views, or arguments in written form to the Washoe County District Board of Health, P.O. Box 11130, Reno, NV 89520. Copies ofthe I-SIP are available at www.washoecounty.us/healthlaqm/home.htmlaud at the Air Quality Management Division, 1001 E. Ninth Street, Suite A115, Reno, NV 89512 for inspection 

### by any interested person. Matt Smith, Chairman Washoe County District Board of Health No, 758749 July 22, Aug 10,22,2011

Ad Number: 1000758749 Page I of I
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,303,918
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  30,028
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            146,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        37,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (183,771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (183,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (183,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.06)




</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 779 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian lands under 

the National Labor Relations Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. MOOLENAAR (for himself, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. COLE, Mr. GIANFORTE, Mr. 

GOSAR, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. 

AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mrs. WALORSKI, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. YOUNG, and Mr. PETERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian tribes on Indian 

lands under the National Labor Relations Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Labor Sov5 ereignty Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER. 

7 Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 152) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 779 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or any In2 dian tribe, or any enterprise or institution owned 

3 and operated by an Indian tribe and located on its 

4 Indian lands,’’ after ‘‘subdivision thereof,’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(15) The term ‘Indian tribe’ means any Indian 

7 tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group 

8 or community which is recognized as eligible for the 

9 special programs and services provided by the 

10 United States to Indians because of their status as 

11 Indians. 

12 ‘‘(16) The term ‘Indian’ means any individual 

13 who is a member of an Indian tribe. 

14 ‘‘(17) The term ‘Indian lands’ means— 

15 ‘‘(A) all lands within the limits of any In16 dian reservation; 

17 ‘‘(B) any lands title to which is either held 

18 in trust by the United States for the benefit of 

19 any Indian tribe or Indian or held by any In20 dian tribe or Indian subject to restriction by the 

21 United States against alienation; and 

22 ‘‘(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma 

23 that are within the boundaries of a former resVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:06 Feb 02, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H779.IH H779

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 779 IH

1 ervation (as defined by the Secretary of the In2 terior) of a federally recognized Indian tribe.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
---

**EXHIBIT 99.10(A)**

CONSENT OF AUTHOR

****

****

****

****

G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat. Geologix Mineral Resource
Consultants (Pty) Ltd. P.O. Box 20, Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2500

US Securities and Exchange Commission



I, G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat, certify that I have read
the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that
there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical
Report or that the written disclosure in the Form 40F of Great Basin Gold Ltd.
contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in Technical Report
on theResource Estimate for the Hollister Development Block Gold
Project dated July 6, 2007.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory
authorities.

Dated this 27thday of March 2008.



|signed and
      sealed         
|--------------------------------
|G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat.

---

**EXHIBIT 99.10(B)**

CONSENT OF AUTHOR





G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat. 
  Geologix Mineral Resource Consultants (Pty) Ltd. 
  P.O. Box 20, Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2500

US Securities and Exchange Commission

I, G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat, certify that I have read
  the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that
  there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical
  Report or that the written disclosure in the Form 40F of Great Basin Gold Ltd.
  contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in Technical
  Report on theResource Estimate for the Burnstone Property, Mpumalanga
  Province of the Republic of South Africa dated March 31 2008.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory authorities.

Dated this 27thday of March 2008.

|signed and sealed               
|--------------------------------
|G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat.

---

**EXHIBIT 99.10(C)**

CONSENT OF AUTHOR





G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat. 
  Geologix Mineral Resource Consultants (Pty) Ltd. 
  P.O. Box 20, Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2500

US Securities and Exchange Commission

I, G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat, certify that I have read
  the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that
  there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical
  Report or that the written disclosure in the Form 40F of Great Basin Gold Ltd.
  contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in Technical Report
  on the Optimisation of the Feasibility Study of the Burnstone Project, Mpulamalanga
  Province, Republic of South Africa” dated June 21, 2007.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory authorities.

Dated this 27thday of March 2008.

|signed and sealed               
|--------------------------------
|G.J. van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat.

---
#### Robert Lewis MAY, Appellant, v. Lena Anne MAY, Appellee.

No. 70-581.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 2, 2017














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of May 31, 2017 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$14,474Sub-advised funds1,408Institutional accounts4,500Total$20,382





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,656Small-Mid Cap3,404Mid Cap98Large Cap9,182All Cap Select406Long-Short4,883Corporate bonds649Core fixed income306(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(202)Total$20,382








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:June 2, 2017By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                             Exhibit 23.6

                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                           
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (333-01574, (333-12789) and (333-24581); Form S-3 
(333-10383) and (333-14025); and on Form S-4 (333-13133) of the U.S. Office 
Products Company of our report dated on March 6, 1996 with respect to the 
combined financial statements of United Envelope Co., Inc. and its affiliate 
for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 (not presented separately in 
the Registration Statements) which report appears in the Annual Report on 
Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of the U.S. Office Products Company for the year 
ended April 26, 1997.

/s/HERTZ, HERSON & COMPANY, LLP

New York, New York
August 18, 1997
<PAGE> 31






INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT



We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West
Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the six-month period then ended and the consolidated statements of
income for the six and three-month period then ended.  These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical and
procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for
financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an
audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report
dated January 21, 2000, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S.R. Snodgrass A.C.



Wheeling, West Virginia
August 1, 2000
#### HOLLYWOOD BANK AND TRUST CO. v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 37960.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 214 So.2d 356.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 (Regis. No. 333-71669) of Smith Gardner and Associates, Inc. of our report
dated February 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Smith
Gardner and Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable preferred
stock and stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the Company's 1998 Amended Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
May 21, 1999
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 3, 2017

No. 04-17-00268-CR

IN RE Richard LARES

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On April 27, 2017, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered the petition and is of the opinion Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The 

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on May 3, 2017.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3 day of May, 2017.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006CR10110W2, styled State of Texas v. Richard Lares, pending in the 

399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Frank J. Castro presiding.
#### B. H. G. KISTNER, John P. Favata and Lucy Favata, Appellants, v. STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, an agency of the State of Florida and County of Hillsborough, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 68-568.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Aug. 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

                   COLONIAL COMMERCIAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                              FED. I.D. 11-2037182



         NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                         I.D. NUMBER
         ------------------                         -----------


  Atlantic Hardware and Supply Corporation           13-2687036

  Wel-Com Financial Services, Inc.                   31-0484520

  Colonial Commercial Sub Corp.                      11-3391045

  Devon Capital Corporation                          11-2511952


                                      -56-
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of DynEco Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
C. Edwards, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Thomas C. Edwards
 ---------------------
 Thomas C. Edwards
 Chief Financial Officer
 March 29, 2005
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER



I, Terence Wise, certify that:



1.       I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Forward Industries, Inc.;



2.       Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;





Date: July 22, 2020



|/s/ Terence Wise                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Terence Wise
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2509
KEITH E. BOOTH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE ON AIDS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA93-3905-PJM) Submitted: February 24, 1998 Decided: March 18, 1998 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith E. Booth, Appellant Pro Se. John A nthony Bielec, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Booth appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing Booth's action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-16 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997), for failure to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Booth v. Prince George's County , No. CA-93-3905-JFM (D. Md. Sept. 19, 1996). We deny Booth's "Motion Request for Reconsideration." We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Andres Julio SANTANA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1307.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 3, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6404

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAUL DARNELL KEARNEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-122-R, CA-96-66-3)

Submitted: October 22, 1996 Decided: November 15, 1996

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Darnell Kearney, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Gerald McBride,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and

Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat.

1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kearney, Nos. CR-91-

122-R; CA-96-66-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED