alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 808 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 808

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit nurse 
  practitioners and physician assistants to satisfy the documentation 
 requirement under the Medicare program for coverage of certain shoes 
                     for individuals with diabetes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2019

  Mr. Blumenauer (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit nurse 
  practitioners and physician assistants to satisfy the documentation 
 requirement under the Medicare program for coverage of certain shoes 
                     for individuals with diabetes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Access to Diabetic Shoes 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING NURSE PRACTITIONERS AND PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS TO 
              SATISFY MEDICARE DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT FOR COVERAGE 
              OF CERTAIN SHOES FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DIABETES.

    Section 1861(s)(12) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395x(s)(12)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, nurse 
        practitioner, or physician assistant'' after ``physician''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``, nurse 
        practitioner, or physician assistant'' after each occurrence of 
        ``physician''.
                                 <all>
```
#### WINDOW MASTER CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF HOLLYWOOD, a United States of America corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-706.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 11, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 22, 1971.

Milton R. Wasman and Hansford D. Tyler, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

*525Paul B. Anton, of Abrams, Anton, Robbins, Resnick & Burke, Hollywood, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting).

Defendant manufactured and installed certain window wall units consisting of large sliding glass doors in the plaintiff’s building. The work was done in accordance with the plaintiff’s plans and specifications and in compliance with the requirements of the local building code. Defendant guaranteed the water tightness of the installation.

Hurricane Betsy forced water under and around the units and into the plaintiff’s building. Thereafter, plaintiff substantially altered the sliding doors so as to make them immobile. Among other things, pieces of aluminum were installed to form a dike between the door tracks and the interior and caulking material was placed around the edges of all of the framed panels. Plaintiff demanded payment from the defendants for the costs of the alterations and additions, together with the cost of cleaning up the water after the storm. The trial court granted judgment for the plaintiff. I would reverse.

While conceivably under the evidence the trial court would be warranted in ordering judgment for the water damage, I feel that the construction of the guarantee so as to award damages for major alterations in the installation as a consequence of an abnormal weather situation, namely, Hurricane Betsy, was in error. Certainly reason and common sense would dictate that under severe hurricane conditions you would necessarily expect water seepage around any and all movable glass windows. Suppose the wind had blown the windows out totally — or even blown the building away — is the guarantee so absolute and unconditional that it must be construed as giving plaintiff a right to damages against defendant for a new installation according to different plans and specifications conceived by plaintiff? I think not.

Further, the expense of caulking, $9,760.-00, cannot be laid at the defendant’s door as there is no showing as to the real necessity of same, coupled with the fact that a portion of same was for an application of caulking material to the seam between the floor slab and the concrete block base, which area was not in anywise connected to defendant’s work or responsibility.

I would reverse.
April 23, 2012

Mr. Robert A. Stewart

1907 Azure Drive Dothan, AL 36303

Dear Mr. Stewart:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 65.71(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 4, 2012, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2012-0393), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open during this period. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-4095.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8091 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8091

   To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to States the total 
amount of funds for the costs to the States of activating the National 
              Guard in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 22, 2020

   Mrs. Bustos (for herself, Ms. Haaland, Mr. Rose of New York, Ms. 
 Jackson Lee, Mr. Cohen, Mr. San Nicolas, Mr. Pappas, Mr. Thompson of 
  California, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. Lynch, Mr. Case, Mr. Rush, Mrs. Watson 
 Coleman, Mr. Kildee, Ms. Titus, Ms. Lee of California, Mrs. Dingell, 
 Mr. Connolly, and Ms. Blunt Rochester) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide to States the total 
amount of funds for the costs to the States of activating the National 
              Guard in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Uniform National Guard 
Implementation To End this Disaster Act'' or the ``UNITED Act''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR NATIONAL GUARD DUTY RELATING TO COVID-19 
              PANDEMIC.

    (a) Requirement.--For purposes of providing funds to a Governor of 
a State under sections 902 and 905 of title 32, United States Code, for 
members of the National Guard ordered to active duty under section 
502(f) of such title for duty in connection with the COVID-19 public 
health emergency, the Secretary of Defense shall pay the total amount 
of the costs of such duty, regardless of whether such members were so 
ordered before the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``COVID-19 public health emergency'' means the 
        public health emergency related to the coronavirus 2019 
        declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services pursuant 
        to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
        247d).
            (2) The term ``Governor of a State'' means the following:
                    (A) The Governor of a State or the Commonwealth of 
                Puerto Rico, Guam, or the Virgin Islands.
                    (B) The commanding general of the District of 
                Columbia National Guard.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

          - [CDC-2018-0007; Docket Number NIOSH-307]

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

                        NIOSH announces the availability of the final                         *National Occupational Research Agenda for Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing*.                    

# DATES:

The final document was published on June 8, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The document may be obtained at the following link:                         *https://www.cdc.gov/​niosh/​nora/​councils/​agff/​research.html*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Emily Novicki, M.A., M.P.H, (                        *NORACoordinator@cdc.gov*), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop E-20, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, phone (404) 498-2581 (not a toll free number).                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On January 17, 2018, NIOSH published a request for public review in the                     **Federal Register**                     [83 FR 2447] of the draft version of the                     *National Occupational Research Agenda for Agriculture, Forestry, and Fishing*. The comment received expressed support for the Agenda.                

Dated: June 11, 2018.

Frank J. Hearl,

Chief of Staff, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2018-12821 Filed 6-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ronald JONES v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1974.

In re: Ronald Jones applying for Writs of Habeas Corpus, Certiorari, Prohibition and other Remedial Writs.

Writ refused. Although the relator states that he was not present at the evi-dentiary hearing, the ground alleged here, that the defense counsel had less than 5 years experience does not rise to a constitutional dimension.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion relator is entitled to a full and adequate eviden-tiary hearing previously ordered by this Court. An ex parte hearing on application of writ of habeas corpus does not comply with our statutes. Moreover, a constitutional question of due process and equal protection is presented under C.Cr.P., Art. 512. I respectfully dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND CONSOLIDATED 
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 INCLUDED IN
THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. THIS DATA HAS BEEN RESTATED AS A RESULT OF REGISTRANT'S 
POOLING-OF-INTEREST TRANSACTION WHICH WAS CONSUMMATED IN THE FOURTH QUARTER OF 
1997.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         80,178
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 937,339
<ALLOWANCES>                                   12,399
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            1,125,944 
<PP&E>                                        291,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                167,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1,807,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,282,423
<BONDS>                                        69,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                      204,445
<OTHER-SE>                                    129,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,807,358
<SALES>                                       567,543 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              567,543
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 540,809 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (3,689)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                20,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                   12,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            13,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   13,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.32
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4937]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
United States Pacific Trade and Investment Policy Commission

Notice of Meeting of the Commission on United States Pacific 
Trade and Investment Policy
AGENCY: Commission on United States--Pacific Trade and Investment 
Policy/Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice that the next meeting of the Commission on United 
States--Pacific Trade and Investment Policy is scheduled for February 
28, 1997 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. This meeting will be open to the 
public from 9:30 to 12:00, closed to the public during a working 
luncheon from 12:00 to 1:30 p.m. and open to the public from 1:30 to 
5:30.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Commission on United States--Pacific Trade and Investment 
Policy will hold its next meeting on February 28, 1997 from 9:30 a.m. 
to 5:30 p.m. These meetings will be open to the public from 9:30 a.m. 
to 12:00, closed to the public during a working luncheon from 12:00 to 
1:30 p.m. and open to the public from 1:30 to 5:30 p.m. These meetings 
will focus on finalization of the Commission's report to the Presidednt 
and the process for releasing the report. Pursuant to Section 
2155(f)(2) of Title 19 of the United States Code, the USTR has 
determined that portions of this meeting will be concerned with matters 
the disclosure of which would seriously compromise the development by 
the United States Government of trade policy, priorities, negotating 
objectives or bargaining positions with respect to the operation of any 
trade agreement and other
matters arising in connection with the development, implementation and 
administration of the trade policy of the United States.

DATES: This meeting is scheduled for February 28, 1997, unless 
otherwise notified.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenues, N.W., Washington, D.C., Room 
6029, unless otherwise notified.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Adams, Executive Director of the 
Commission on United States--Pacific Trade and Investment Policy, Room 
400, 600 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20508, (202) 395-9679.
Nancy Adams,
Executive Director, Commission on United States--Pacific Trade and 
Investment Policy.
Charlene Barshefsky,
United States Trade Representative, Acting.
[FR Doc. 97-4937 Filed 2-24-97; 1:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John Henry HALL v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54464.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 5, 1974.

In re: John Henry Hall applying for Writ of Certiorari and Habeas Corpus.

Granted. See Order (for evidentiary hearing).

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents being of the opinion that the ruling of the trial judge is correct for the reasons he assigned, i. e., a waiver of counsel is alleged in the prisoner’s first petition for habeas corpus.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents from the granting of this writ for the reasons assigned by the Chief Justice.

ORDER

Evidentiary hearing is ordered to determine whether accused in 1960 voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to counsel.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 793 

To prohibit the use of funds for the official travel of Members of Congress 

during any period in which a Government shutdown is in effect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2019 

Mr. BUCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds for the official travel of Members of Congress during any period in which a Government shutdown is in effect. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITING MEMBER OFFICIAL TRAVEL DUR4 ING SHUTDOWN. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Except as provided in subsection 

6 (b), no appropriated funds, including official funds of the 

7 House of Representatives, official funds of the Senate, or 

8 funds available under any Federal law, rule, or regulation, 

9 may be used to pay for the costs of travel by a Member 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 793 IH

1 of Congress during any period in which a Government 

2 shutdown is in effect. 

3 (b) EXCEPTION FOR TRAVEL BY MEMBER TO WASH4 INGTON METROPOLITAN AREA.—Subsection (a) does not 

5 apply with respect to travel by a Member of Congress to 

6 the Washington Metropolitan Area. 

7 (c) DETERMINATION OF GOVERNMENT SHUT8 DOWN.—For purposes of subsection (a), a Government 

9 shutdown shall be considered to be in effect if there is 

10 a lapse in appropriations for any Federal agency or de11 partment as a result of a failure to enact a regular appro12 priations bill or continuing resolution. 

13 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

14 (1) the term ‘‘Member of Congress’’ means a 

15 Senator or a Representative in, or Delegate or Resi16 dent Commissioner to, the Congress; and 

17 (2) the term ‘‘Washington Metropolitan Area’’ 

18 means the District of Columbia, the Counties of 

19 Montgomery and Prince Georges in Maryland, and 

20 the Counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Loudon, and 

21 Prince William and the Cities of Alexandria and 

22 Falls Church in Virginia. 

23 (e) SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING NEED OF

24 MEMBERS TO REMAIN AT WORK DURING GOVERNMENT

25 SHUTDOWN.—It is the sense of Congress that, whenever 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 793 IH

1 a Government shutdown is in effect, Members of Congress 

2 should remain at work in Washington, DC until the shut3 down is no longer in effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-KSB AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL SATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           160,011
<SECURITIES>                                   1,400,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    986,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                      61,184
<INVENTORY>                                        7,172
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,687,186
<PP&E>                                           600,099
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (217,752)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,161,331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,233,865
<BONDS>                                           45,539
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          7,458,926
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         157,180
<OTHER-SE>                                    (8,265,608)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,161,331
<SALES>                                          261,341
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 620,484
<CGS>                                            410,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    410,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              17,558,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               108,892
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (16,715,433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (14,675,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (14,675,433)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (2.15)


</TABLE>