alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         370,638
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       6,870,674
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               347,214
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    871,956
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         236,028
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           235,890
<LOANS>                                      6,751,030
<ALLOWANCE>                                     98,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,091,013
<DEPOSITS>                                   7,816,803
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            116,339
<LONG-TERM>                                    338,073<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,673
<OTHER-SE>                                     700,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               9,091,013
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                594,684
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               50,201
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                11,344
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               656,229
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             254,145
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             278,594
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          377,635
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   86,242
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,040
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                417,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                101,595
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      62,917
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    62,917
<EPS-BASIC>                                     188.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   188.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,382
<LOANS-PAST>                                    53,581
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0<F2>
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               106,484
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  109,183
<RECOVERIES>                                    17,395
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               98,049
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F2>
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES 93,594 IN CAPITAL NOTES
<F2> THIS INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR INTERIM REPORTING PURPOSES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      291
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,963
<PP&E>                                          24,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,973)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,908
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              324
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           121
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,908
<SALES>                                            706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   723
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (739)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Joseph G. Breidner, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County,

June 20, 1952.

*79
      *Milton Risen*for Samuel G. Breidner and another, infants, petitioners.

*Selma Simon,*as successor trustee under the will of Joseph G. Breidner, deceased, in person.

Potts, S.

This is an application by two infants for an order permitting the withdrawal of $1,500 from the accumulated income of each of two testamentary trusts of personal property for their benefit for the purpose of defraying tuition costs and expenses incidental to their acquiring advanced education. The will provides for an alternative disposition of the accumulated income in the event the primary beneficiary dies before attaining majority.

The present trustee is the mother of the infants. She appears in the proceeding and consents to the granting of the application. The joint affidavit of herself and the infants’ stepfather supports the allegations of the petition as to lack of other sufficient means to pay for the infants’ education. While the statutory authority for the relief requested is not disclosed by the petition or supporting papers, the court considers the application as made pursuant to section 17 of the Personal Property Law.

Although the contingent income beneficiaries are not parties, their interests are represented herein by the trustee whose action, in the absence of fraud or collusion, is binding upon them. They are not necessary parties *(Matter of Haag,*100 Misc. 249).

The will provisions providing for a gift over of the accumulated income upon the death of the infant before attaining his or her majority, as the case may be, although lawful *(Smith*v. *Parsons,*146 N. Y. 116), do not deprive the infant of the benefit accorded by section 17 of the Personal Property Law *(Matter of Wagner,*81 App. Div. 163; *Matter of Reilly,*170 Misc. 932).

The application is granted and the trustee is directed to take the sum of $1,500 from the accumulated income of each of the trusts and apply the same for the education of the respective infants and expenses incidental thereto.

Order signed.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

<Table>
<Caption>

NAME OF                                                       JURISDICTION OF
SUBSIDIARY                                                    INCORPORATION
----------                                                    -------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Actar Airforce, Inc.                                          Canada
Breas Medical AB                                              Sweden
Marquest Medical Products, Inc.                               Colorado
Sleep Services of America, Inc.                               Pennsylvania
  (formerly, National Sleep Technologies, Inc.)
Stelex -- The Validation Group, Inc.                          Pennsylvania
  (formerly, The Validation Group, Inc.)
Thomas Medical Products, Inc.                                 Pennsylvania
Vital Pharma, Inc.                                            Florida
Vital Signs California, Inc.                                  California
Vital Signs Limited                                           United Kingdom
Vital Signs MN, Inc.                                          Minnesota
Vital Signs Export, Inc.                                      Barbados
</Table>





                                       54
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

March 23, 2015

Hon. Bennett Stahl

One Riverwalk Place, Suite 1800

700 N. St. Mary's Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Steven J. Pawlowski

Shackelford, Melton & McKinley, LLP

3333 Lee Parkway, Tenth Floor

Dallas, TX 75231

* DEL IVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Jonathan Pauerstein

755 E Mulberry Ave, Suite 200

San Antonio, TX 78212

- 4285

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00713

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. 45,434

Style: Arcturus Corporation v. Espada Operating, LLC, Bengal Energy, L.P., Lee

R oy Billington, Rodney Rolston and Mitchell K. Michelson

On February, 18, 2015, this Court order ed the parties to mediation. Parties were

to inform the Court in writing within seven days of the mediator chosen. This

information is now overdue. If the Court does not receive this information in seven days

from the date of this correspondence then it will proceed to appoint a mediator.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch
#### Francisco VELEZ, Petitioner, v. KANE FURNITURE COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 40978.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 4, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________ No. 15 -3810

________________ STEVEN J. TRZASKA,

Appellant

v. L’OREAL USA, INC.; L’OREAL, S.A.

________________ Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 2 -15- cv -02713) District Judge: Honorable Susan D. Wigenton

________________ Argued November 16, 2016

________________ Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES, and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed July 25, 2017) ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION AMBRO, Circuit Judge
IT IS NOW ORDERED that the Precedential Opinion in the above case filed Jul y 25, 2017, be amended as follows: On page 3, line 3, delete the word “are” and substitute in its place “appear to be” On page 3, line 4, insert after “skin

- deep,” and before “we” the clause “they plausibly pass muster at the motion- to

- dismiss stage. Thus” On page 8, note 2, line 7, delete the second “that” On page 11, fir st paragraph, line 6, delete the words “As such,” and substitute in its place “Thus”2

On page 11, third paragraph, line 3, delete the word “that” and replace it with “the” On page 12, penultimate line, delete the comma after “There”
By the Court, s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge Dated: August 22, 2017 sb/cc: All Counsel of Re cord
#### James William PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44768.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 28, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
#### The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF the CITY OF NEW YORK, a Connecticut corporation, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF REGENTS, a public corporation under the laws of the State of Florida, for the use and benefit of Trop-X Corporation, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-47.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 9, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1








October 7, 2013Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Megan Lewis918-561-5325





ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Third-quarter


2013 Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





TULSA, Okla. – Oct. 7, 2013 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will release their third-quarter 2013 earnings after the market closes on Nov. 5, 2013.





ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ executive  management will participate in a joint conference call the following day on Nov. 6, 2013, at 11 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (10 a.m. Central Standard Time).  The call also will be carried live on ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ websites.





To participate in the telephone conference call, dial 888-850-2545, pass code 2072368, or log on to www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





|      |                                                                                 
|----- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|What: | ONEOK and ONEOK Partners third-quarter 2013 earnings conference call and webcast




|      |                              
|----- | -----------------------------
|When: | 11 a.m. Eastern, Nov. 6, 2013

10 a.m. Central





|       |                                                              
|------ | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Where: | 1) Phone conference call dial 888-850-2545, pass code 2072368

2) Log on to the webcast at www.oneok.com


3) Log on to the webcast at www.oneokpartners.com





If you are unable to participate in the conference call or the webcast, the replay will be available on ONEOK’s website, www.oneok.com , and ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com , for 30 days.  A recording will be available by phone for seven days. The playback call may be accessed at 888-203-1112, pass code 2072368.








ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company. We are the general partner and as of Aug. 12, 2013, own 41.3 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of





-more-


---



ONEOK and ONEOK Partners Third-quarter 2013


Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





Page 2





natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas.  ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Stock Index.








For more information, visit the websites at www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews and


@ONEOKPartners .





###
#### Joel HOCH, Samuel Frey, David B. Zugman, Richard G. Greenawalt, and Kenneth H. Stephens, Certified Public Accountants, d/b/a Hoch, Frey & Zugman, a partnership, Appellants, v. GLOBAL INTERNATIONAL IMPORTERS, INC. and Victor Manuel, Appellees.

No. 70-773.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 2, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 1971.

Bryson K. Lovejoy of Ward, Gustafson & Caldwell, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Robert J. Derham, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Victor Manuel.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.

CROSS, C. J., dissents, with opinion.

CROSS, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

I respectfully dissent. Appellants-plaintiffs appeal a final judgment entered in *465favor of appellees-defendants on the pleadings in a cause of action on an account stated. Appellants sought leave to further amend the complaint which was denied. I would reverse and remand allowing the appellants opportunity to further amend, Baird v. Continental Insurance Co., Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 206; Stephens v. Dichtenmueller, Fla.1968, 216 So.2d 448.
Exhibit 99.1










February 2, 2011

Analyst Contact:
Andrew ZiolaMedia Contact:
918-588-7163

Megan Washbourne

918-588-7572





ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners


To Present at Credit Suisse Energy Summit




TULSA, Okla. –Feb. 2, 2011 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will present at the Credit Suisse Energy Summit on Thursday, Feb. 10, 2011, in Vail, Colo.




John W. Gibson, president and chief executive officer of ONEOK and chairman, president and chief executive officer of ONEOK Partners, will present at the conference at 7:35 a.m. Mountain Standard Time (8:35 a.m. Central Standard Time).




The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on the ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners websites, www.oneok.comand www.oneokpartners.com. A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days after the conference.




The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners websites, www.oneok.comand www.oneokpartners.com, on Thursday, Feb. 10, 2011, beginning at 7 a.m. Central Standard Time.








ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.




ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company. We are the general partner and own 42.8 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas. Our energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S. ONEOK is a Fortune 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the websites at www.oneokpartners.comor www.oneok.com. OKE-FV OKS-FV





###
#### William Kenneth GRIFFIN, a/k/a Gunnar Griffin, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-873.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 16, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE, NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA v. William LeBOUEF.

No. 60162.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 1977.

In re: William LeBouef applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 346 So.2d 884.

Application denied; no error of law in the judgments below.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6133

NOAH R. ROBINSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-3666-2-6-AJ)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noah R. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order transferring

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) action to the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois. We dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. See

Ellicott Mach. Corp. v. Modern Welding Co., 502 F.2d 178, 180 (4th

Cir. 1974) (transfer order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (1994)

is not immediately appealable). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.

R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S.

541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we deny Appellant's "Motion to Dismiss Detainer

And Indictment with Prejudice" and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

SNODGRASS 

 

Certified Public Accountants and Consultants 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

Board of Directors 

First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc. 

 

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West Virginia Bancorp,Inc. and its subsidiary as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for the three-monthperiod ended March 31, 2005 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 

 

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantiallyless in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we donot express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of anymaterial modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and inour report dated February 4, 2005 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. 

 

Wheeling, West Virginia 

May 13, 2005 

 

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C. 

980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
#### Carl K. JONES and Florence Jones, his wife, Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MERRITT ISLAND, a national bank, Appellee.

No. 69-376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.