alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce 

450 W. Kemp St, PO Box 795 

Rhinelander, Wl 54501 

www.rhinelanderchamber.com 

WWrof 

Dffr-osr-2x>ii-oic:') 

January 15, 2012 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Attn: Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division 

RE: Docltet OST-2011-0109 Rhinelander, Wisconsin 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

On behalf of the Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, I would urge you to 

support the proposal of Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd. to provide essential air transportation services to 

Rhinelander, Wisconsin. Great Lakes Aviation has a history with the aviation community in Rhinelander 

and understands the importance air transportation provides to the community and surrounding area. 

Reliable air transportation to major airline hubs provides the advantage that our local businesses and 

manufacturers need to stay competitive in today's market place: Great Lakes Aviation will be providing 

an essential service to the Rhinelander business community. 

This service will also provide a great boost to the tourism industry, which is so essential to the 

Northwoods of Wisconsin and the U.P. of Michigan, serviced by the Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport. 

Great Lakes Aviation has a unique knowledge of the Rhinelander market and the influence the peak 

summer travel months have on air transportation in this area. 

I urge you to support the proposal from Great Lakes Aviation to provide essential air services to the 

Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport. 

Lara Reed, Executiv^Director 

Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce 

Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce ' 450 West Kemp Street, Post Office Box 795 * Rhinelander, v»/l 54501 

(715)365-7464'(800)236 4FUN * www.Rhinel3nderChamber.com
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Thomas O. WEST, Eldred A. Saxton and Paul K. Starr.

No. 60186.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 21, 1977.

In re: Thomas 0. West, Eldred A. Saxton and Paul K. Starr applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writ application of petitioners West and Saxton are denied. No merit in their applications.

Application of petitioner Paul K. Starr is granted; a contradictory hearing is ordered to determine whether defendant’s rights as explained to him at time of underlying DWI conviction, and as to which court minutes indicate waiver, included the right to have an attorney represent him.

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents from the granting of the writ as to Starr, being of the opinion that the court minutes adequately show a waiver of counsel.
#### Regina M. CAMINITI, Appellant, v. Anthony D. CAMINITI, Appellee.

No. 72-365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
PUBLIC

1 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

In the Matter of 

HEALTH RESEARCH LABORATORIES, LLC, 

a limited liability company, 

WHOLE BODY SUPPLEMENTS, LLC, 

a limited liability company, and 

KRAMER DUHON, 

individually and as an officer of HEALTH 

RESEARCH LABORATORIES, LLC and 

WHOLE BODY SUPPLEMENTS, LLC 

DOCKET NO. 9397 

RESPONDENTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER

This Certificate of Conference is intended to supplement the Certificate of 

Compliance filed with the Motion for Leave to Amend the Answer filed on February 12, 

2021. Pursuant to Paragraph 4 of the Court’s December 14, 2020 Scheduling Order, the 

undersigned counsel represents that, after it appeared that Complaint Counsel intended to 

oppose the motion for leave (even though Respondents were agreeing to admit to all 

material facts in the Complaint), I set up a telephone conference to discuss whether 

Complaint Counsel agrees to motion to amend the answer. On the telephone conference 

with Complaint Counsel on February 17, 2021, Complaint Counsel did not want to 

discuss the reasons or grounds for opposing the motion to amend because the conference 

did not occur prior to the filing. I understand that Complaint Counsel opposes the 

motion to amend, but I do not understand the grounds or basis because Complaint 

Counsel did not want to discuss the grounds or reason. 

 /s/ Joel W. Reese 

Joel W. Reese 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 2/23/2021 | OSCAR NO. 600754 | PUBLIC
PUBLIC

2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 23, 2021, I filed the foregoing document 

electronically using the FTC’s E-Filing system, which will send notification to: 

April J. Tabor 

Acting Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Rm. H-113 

Washington, DC 20580 

ElectronicFilings@ftc.gov 

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Rm. H-110 

Washington, DC 20580 

Elizabeth Averill 

eaverill@ftc.gov 

Jonathan Cohen 

jcohen2@ftc.gov 

COMPLAINT COUNSEL 

 /s/ Joel W. Reese 

 Joel W. Reese 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 2/23/2021 | OSCAR NO. 600754 | PUBLIC
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.62

Per Pat -

Borrowed $31,000 from D. Devlin with interest equivalent to 10,000 common shares
per month, until repaid.
#### William M. MARTIN, III, alias v. STATE.

3 Div. 546.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Dec. 20, 1977.

After remandment by the Supreme Court of Alabama, REVERSED AND REMANDED on authority of Supreme Court 2508 Ms., November 4, 1977, 354 So.2d 1152. No opinion.

All the Judges concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7813 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require disclosures of foreign 

gifts by entities affiliated with institutions of higher education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2020 

Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require 

disclosures of foreign gifts by entities affiliated with institutions of higher education. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Academic Institution 

5 Research Integrity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURES OF FOREIGN GIFTS REQUIRED FOR 

7 AFFILIATED ENTITIES. 

8 Section 117(h)(4) of the Higher Education Act of 

9 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1011f(h)(4)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7813 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through 

2 (C) as clauses (i) through (iii), respectively, and ad3 justing the margins accordingly; 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘means any institution’’ and in5 serting the following: 

6 ‘‘(A) means any institution’’; 

7 (3) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end and inserting 

8 ‘‘or’’; and 

9 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(B) means any nonprofit foundation or 

11 other entity affiliated with an institution de12 scribed in subparagraph (A), such as a re13 search, an endowment, or an alumni founda14 tion; and’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      21,557,916
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,183,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,640,922
<PP&E>                                         433,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,439,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,579,775
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,641
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,845,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,439,085
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,115,402
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (18,115,402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (18,115,402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (18,115,402)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.59)
        

</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), INeil H. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

             /s/ Neil H. Ellis            

Neil H. Ellis

President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

 

Date: September 28, 2007
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 18-11757

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-00325-ODE

IVY WHITWORTH, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SUNTRUST BANKS, INC., 

 Defendant - Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(April 13, 2020)

Before WILSON and BRANCH, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI,∗ Judge.

PER CURIAM:

∗ The Honorable Jane A. Restani, United States Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, 

sitting by designation.

Case: 18-11757 Date Filed: 04/13/2020 Page: 1 of 3
2

Ivy Whitworth appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to her 

former employer SunTrust Banks in this retaliatory termination case. Whitworth 

claims she was fired in retaliation for voicing opposition to alleged discrimination 

against a co-worker in violation of Title VII1 and § 1981.2

 SunTrust counters that 

she was fired for misusing her corporate credit card in violation of company 

policy. The district court granted summary judgment to SunTrust, finding that 

Whitworth failed to satisfy the “but-for” causation standard articulated in 

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar, 570 U.S. 338, 362 

(2013).

Having fully reviewed the record and after the benefit of oral argument, we

affirm the district court’s order.

3

 Regardless of the validity of Whitworth’s 

temporal proximity arguments,4 we agree with the district court that she failed to 

show, through her comparators or otherwise, that SunTrust’s proffered reason for 

her termination was mere pretext. As the district court correctly noted, Whitworth 

fails to satisfy the but-for causation standard whether that standard is applied at the 

1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e, et seq.

2 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

3 Whitworth v. SunTrust Banks, Inc., No. 1:16-CV-325-ODE-CMS, 2018 WL 1634301 

(N.D. Ga. Mar. 30, 2018) (as amended Apr. 3, 2018).

4 Without discussing its contours and limits here, we note that “temporal proximity” has 

continued relevance in determining causation under our post-Nassar jurisprudence. See Jefferson, 

891 F.3d at 926.

Case: 18-11757 Date Filed: 04/13/2020 Page: 2 of 3
3

prima facie or pretext stage of the traditional burden-shifting test articulated in 

McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973). See Jefferson v. Sewon 

America, Inc., 891 F.3d 911, 924–26 (11th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, the district 

court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of SunTrust. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 18-11757 Date Filed: 04/13/2020 Page: 3 of 3
#### Chancessllor MADISON, Appellant, v. Rev. J. B. BLAKE, Appellee.

No. 73-186.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 6, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; W. C. Williams, III, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12588]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 10438]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Imported 
for Exhibition Determinations: ``John Singer Sargent and Chicago's 
Gilded Age'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects to be included in the exhibition 
``John Singer Sargent and Chicago's Gilded Age,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute of Chicago, in 
Chicago, Illinois, from on or about July 1, 2018, until on or about 
September 30, 2018, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elliot Chiu, Attorney-Adviser, Office 
of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-
6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#790a1c1a0d1016174b4d4c40390a0d180d1c571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34475157405d5b5a0600010d7447405540511a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000.

Marie Therese Porter Royce,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2018-12588 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

m 99-31305

_______________

KENNETH C. DUCHESNE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

HERCULES OFFSHORE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(98-CV-300)

_________________________

December 8, 2000

Before POLITZ, SMITH, and PARKER,

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In thisJones Act case, the employer appeals

a finding of 100% liability for plaintiff’s back

injury. We have reviewed the briefs and applicable law and pertinent portions of the record

and have heard the arguments of counsel. 

Especially given the highly deferentialstandard of review, we see no reversible error. the

judgment, accordingly, is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7564 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to require the Securities 

and Exchange Commission to adopt data protection policies for information the Commission receives from investment advisers, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2020 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia (for himself and Mr. LOUDERMILK) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to require 

the Securities and Exchange Commission to adopt data 

protection policies for information the Commission receives from investment advisers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SEC Data Protection 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROCEDURE FOR DATA PROTECTION. 

7 Section 204 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 

8 (15 U.S.C. 80b–4) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7564 IH

1 (1) by redesignating the second subsection (d) 

2 (relating to records of persons with custody or use) 

3 as subsection (e); and 

4 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(f) DATA PROTECTION POLICIES.—Not later than 

6 1 year after the date of enactment of this subsection, the 

7 Commission shall adopt, after notice and comment, poli8 cies and procedures reasonably designed to protect sen9 sitive, nonpublic proprietary information, as determined 

10 by the Commission, that the Commission obtains or re11 ceives from an investment adviser subject to this section, 

12 from unlawful use or disclosure. Such policies and proce13 dures shall— 

14 ‘‘(1) address circumstances when the Commis15 sion requests such proprietary information; 

16 ‘‘(2) safeguard the information, taking into con17 sideration the level of sensitivity of the information; 

18 ‘‘(3) limit access to the information to appro19 priate staff, as determined by the Commission; and 

20 ‘‘(4) protect the information from unlawful use 

21 or disclosure.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

               Wedge-Net Associate Application and Confidentiality

Signing this document, I do agree to the following specific conditions:


1.   I shall not share, distribute or in any way divulge any information, ideas,
     concepts,  plans or research  being done by this group,  to any third party
     for a period of three years.
2.   I shall agree not to develop  independently,  compete or  produce a product
     or service in direct or indirect  competition with the products we may plan
     to develop or actually develop for a period of three years from this date.
3.   I am  not  employed  by,  nor  do I  represent  any  other  agency,  group,
     individual  or firm who might benefit from those ideas and concepts we will
     develop.
4.   Should I become employed by another agency, group, individual or firm which
     might  benefit  from  our  ideas or  products,  I agree  not to share  such
     information for a period of three years from this date.
5.   I will continue to represent  myself,  the other associates and the company
     in a positive and  professional  manner at all times.  I will assist in the
     promotion,  reputation and continued  success of the company to the best of
     my ability.  I agree not to participate in any activity which might reflect
     poorly on our  organization  or represent  the  organization  in a false or
     misleading manner.


Full Name  Daniel Guthrie            Signature /s/ Daniel Guthrie
           --------------                      ------------------
Signed with Gregory M. Walters, President present.  Endorsed.

Signature /s/ Gregory M. Walters Dated this 8 day of Dec, 2000.
          ----------------------           --        ---   ---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Request ID: 931253 Report Code: AMP480 Nov. 22, 2011

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: HXN

State County Site Parameter POC City AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

42 021 0011 88101

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS

USER SITE METADATA

MERGE PDF FILES

QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE

WORKFILE DELIMITER

SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING

Option Type Option Value

STREET ADDRESS

YES

NO

,

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

GLOBAL DATES

2010

Start Date End Date

2010

Tribal

Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

PM25 24-hour 2006

PM25 Annual 2006
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Nov. 22, 2011

Notes:

1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year).

2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT

Report Date: Nov. 22, 2011

Notes:

1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year).

2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*').

Page 2 of 2

Pollutant:

Standard Units:

NAAQS Standard:

Statistic:

Statistic:

Site-LevelPM2.5 - Local Conditions(88101)

Micrograms/cubic meter (LC)(105)

PM25 24-hour 2006 / PM25 Annual 2006

Annual Weighted Mean

Annual 98th Percentile

Level:

Level:

Design Value Year: 2010

REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.

15

35 State Name: Pennsylvania

Site_ID /

STREET ADDRESS

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

Wtd.

Mean 

98th

Perctil Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Cred.

Days

Comp.

Qrtrs

98th

Perctil

Wtd.

Mean Cert.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

|

|

|

Design

Value

Valid

Ind.

24-Hour Annual 2010 2009 2008

42-021-0011

MILLER AUTO SHOP 1 MESSENGER ST

364 4 30.2 11.9 N 349 4 28.7 11.9 N 122 4 32.2 13.9 Y 30 Y 12.6 Y