alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                   1,225,990,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     141,595,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           117,148,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            24,553,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              4,723,955,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   2,972,053,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     2,987,450,000
<LOANS>                                 23,852,206,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                325,238,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          35,076,264,000
<DEPOSITS>                              27,184,895,000
<SHORT-TERM>                             3,897,743,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        611,797,000
<LONG-TERM>                                424,176,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   138,195,000
<OTHER-SE>                               2,819,458,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          35,076,264,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          1,545,899,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          336,404,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             50,203,00
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         1,932,506,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         799,178,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         948,247,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      984,259,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               41,482,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           3,127,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            839,939,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            446,800,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 446,800,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               294,705,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.28
<LOANS-NON>                                137,394,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                40,561,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             4,852,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           304,223,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               58,334,000
<RECOVERIES>                                20,685,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          325,238,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       325,238,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    325,238,000
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7888 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress a report 

on the REACH VET program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2020 

Ms. TORRES SMALL of New Mexico (for herself, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, and Mrs. 

LEE of Nevada) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to 

Congress a report on the REACH VET program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘REACH VET report5 ing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON REACH VET PROGRAM OF DEPART7 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of VetVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:09 Aug 18, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7888.IH H7888

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7888 IH

1 erans Affairs shall submit to Congress a report on the 

2 REACH VET program. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection 

4 (a) shall include the following: 

5 (1) An assessment of the impact of the REACH 

6 VET program on rates of suicide among veterans. 

7 (2) An assessment of how limits within the 

8 REACH VET program, such as caps on the number 

9 of veterans who may be flagged as high risk, are ad10 justed for differing rates of suicide across the coun11 try. 

12 (3) A detailed explanation, with evidence, for 

13 why the conditions included in the model used by the 

14 REACH VET program were chosen, including an 

15 explanation as to why certain conditions, such as bi16 polar disorder II, were not included even though 

17 they show a similar rate of risk for suicide as other 

18 conditions that were included. 

19 (4) An assessment of the feasibility of incor20 porating certain economic data held by the Veterans 

21 Benefits Administration into the model used by the 

22 REACH VET program, including financial data and 

23 employment status, which research indicates may 

24 have an impact on risk for suicide. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7888 IH

1 (c) REACH VET PROGRAM DEFINED.—In this sec2 tion, the term ‘‘REACH VET program’’ means the Recov3 ery Engagement and Coordination for Health—Veterans 

4 Enhanced Treatment program of the Department of Vet5 erans Affairs. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. PD-0123-15
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

JAMES FERNANDEZ, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from Val Verde County

* * * * *
STATE’S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR

FILING ITS BRIEF * * * * * Lisa C. McMinn State Prosecuting Attorney Bar I.D. No. 13803300 John R. Messinger Asst. State Prosecuting Attorney Bar I.D. No. 24053705
P. O. Box 13046 Austin, Texas 78711 512/463-1660 (Telephone) 512/463-5724 (Fax) PD-0123-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/9/2015 4:08:16 PM Accepted 7/10/2015 8:55:03 AM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKTO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS:

Co m es no w th e St at e of Tex as , by an d th ro ug h it s St at e Pro se cu ti ng Att or ne y ,

an d res pe ct fu ll y su bm it s to th e Co ur t its m ot io n to ex te nd th e ti m e fo r fil in g it s br ie f

to an d i nc lu di ng th e 24 da y of Ju ly, 20 15 . This off ic e ag reed to rep res en t t he Sta te th
in th is m at te r on Ju ne 24 , 20 15 , an d th e ad di ti on al ti m e wou ld pr ov id e th e th irt y da y s

no rm al ly pe rm it te d a res po nd in g pa rty. No pr ev io us m ot io ns to ex te nd th is de ad li ne ha ve be en fil ed

. W HEREFORE, th e St at e pr ay s th at it s m ot io n to ex te nd th e ti m e fo r fil in g i ts
pe ti ti on un ti l J ul y

24 , 20 15 , be g ran te d.

Res pe ct fu ll y su bm it te d,

/s/ Jo hn R. Mes si ng er JOHN R. MESS INGER Ass is ta nt Sta te Pro se cu ti ng Att or ne y Bar I .D. No. 24 05 37 05
P.O. Box 13 04 6 Aus ti n, Tex as 78 71 1 51 2/ 46 3- 16 60 (Tele ph on e) 51 2/ 46 3- 57 24 (Fax )

1CERTI FICATE OF SERVI CE

A co py of th e fo reg oi ng St at e’s Mo ti on to Ext en d th e Tim e fo r Fi li ng it s Bri ef
ha s b een eFi le d o r e-m ai le d o n t hi s t he 9 da y of J ul y , 20 15 to : th
Mel is sa Harg is Ass is ta nt Att or ne y

Gene ral Dis tri ctAtt or n 

### ey

Pro Te m Office of th e Att orne y

Gene ral Aus ti n, TX 78 71 1 m el is sa .ha rg is @t ex as at to rn ey ge ne ral .go v Ja m es Gerard McDer m ot t, II 81 40 N. Mop ac W es tp ark4, Su it e 2 50 Aus ti n, TX 78 75 9 jam es @c en tra lt ex as la wy ers .co m /s/ Jo hn R. Mes si ng er Jo hn R. Mes si ng er Ass is ta nt Sta te Pro se cu ti ng Att or ne y

2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2002 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Frederick S. Schiff, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the
periods presented.

Dated: December 19, 2002


/s/ Frederick S. Schiff
------------------------
Frederick S. Schiff
Chief Financial Officer


                                       71
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

WITTAYA THEERACHANON
,
Plaintiff Below, Appellant,

v.

FIA CARDS SERVICES and TENAGLIA & HUNT, P.A., LLP,

Defendants Below, Appellee s

. § § § No. 1 55 , 2024 § § Court Below

— Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware § § C.A. No. 2023

- 0536 § § § §

Submitted: April 23, 2024 Decided: May 8 , 2024

Before VALIHURA
, TRAYNOR
, and LEGROW
, Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response
, it appears to

the Court that :
(1) On April 2, 2024, a Court of Chancery Magistrate issued her final report
under Court of Chancery Rule 144 dismissing the amended complaint filed by the
plaintiff below

- appellant, Wittaya Theerachanon

. In the final report, the Magistrate
advised that exceptions to the report and all prior reports had to be filed within eleven
days. No exceptions have been filed.

(2) On April 16, 2024, Theerachanon filed a notice of appeal from the
Magistrate’s final report in this Court. The Clerk’s Office issued a notice directing2

Theerachanon to show why this appeal should not be dismissed because the
Magistrate’s April 2, 2024 final report had not been approved and entered as a final
order of the court as provided in Court of Chancery Rule 144(c)

. (3) In response to the notice to show cause, Theerachanon argues the merits

of the appeal

. The response does not address the jurisdictional defect.

(4) In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to submit their dispute to
a Magistrate for final decision under 10 Del. C. § 350 or an order by the Court of
Chancery adopting the Magistrate’s final report under Court of Chancery Rule
144(c), this Court lacks jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a Magistrate’s order. 1

The parties did not stipulate to submit their dispute to a Magistrate for a final

decision. Nor has the Court of Chancery entered an order adopting the Magistrate’s
final report. Accordingly, this appeal must be dismissed

.

1 Appleby Apartments LP v. Appleby Apartments Assocs., L.P.
, 2024 WL 851809, at *2 (Del. Feb. 29, 2024) (holding the Court lacked jurisdiction over an appeal from a Magistrate’s order where the order had not been adopted by the Chancellor or a Vice Chancellor under Rule 144(c) and the parties had not stipulated to final adjudication of their matter by a Magistrate); Timco v. Allied World , 2023 WL 8739455 , at *1 (Del. Dec. 18, 2023) (dismissing appeal from a Magistrate ’ s dismissal order in matter in which there was no adoption of the Magistrate’s dismissal order by the Chancellor or a Vice Chancellor under Rule 144(c) and there was no stipulation under 10 Del. C. § 350).3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29 (b ),

that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Gary F. Traynor Justice
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0078

_____________________________

MARSHAUN WEST,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County.

Ana Maria Garcia, Judge.

December 19, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Marshaun West, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Ravi N. Sharma, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 11.1

Statement Regarding
Computation of Per Share Earnings

31



---

Computation of Earnings Per Share

The following formula was used to calculate
the earnings per share, Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3

Earnings Per
Share

Net Income /Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period



|                   |  | Three months endedMarch 31, | 
|------------------ |  | --------------------------- | 
|                   |  |                             | 
|                   |  | 2003                        | 
|                   |  |                             | 
|Weighted Average   |  |                             | 
|Shares Outstanding |  | 1,538,443                   | 
|Net Income         |  | 619,471                     | 
|Per Share Amount   |  | .40                         | 

No common stock equivalents exist.

32
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 8136 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 8136

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure that investigations 
  of sexual misconduct by institutions of higher education are fair, 
                  trauma-informed, and evidence-based.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            August 28, 2020

 Ms. Slotkin (for herself, Ms. Frankel, Ms. Haaland, and Ms. Kuster of 
New Hampshire) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure that investigations 
  of sexual misconduct by institutions of higher education are fair, 
                  trauma-informed, and evidence-based.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trauma-Informed Investigation Act''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS.

    Section 487(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1094(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(30) The institution will ensure that any investigation 
        of sexual harassment or other sexual misconduct carried out by 
        the institution is a trauma-informed investigation that--
                    ``(A) is equitable and timely;
                    ``(B) is conducted in a manner that recognizes the 
                emotional, behavioral, developmental, and legal 
                challenges that can accompany trauma exposure; and
                    ``(C) includes evidence-based procedures, informed 
                by cognitive science, that are designed to identify, 
                address, and minimize further trauma to victims.''.
                                 <all>
```
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000037008
<NAME> FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      21,312,000
<SECURITIES>                                12,651,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,008,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,971,000
<PP&E>                                     769,436,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (115,174,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             816,079,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       46,326,000
<BONDS>                                    422,114,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 54,109,000
<COMMON>                                    28,137,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 168,574,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               816,079,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           154,203,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              108,801,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,862,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,483,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,435,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,435,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

__________________________________________

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., ) 

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., ) 

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________)

ORDER GRANTING CONSENT MOTIONS FOR LEAVE 

TO AMEND ANSWER AND DEFENSES 

On January 3, 2023, Respondent Microsoft Corp. (“Microsoft”) and Respondent Activision 

Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”) each filed a Consent Motion for Leave to Amend its Answer and 

Defenses (“Consent Motions”). Respondents each seek to withdraw Defenses No. 17 through 22 

raised in the Answers each filed December 22, 2022. 

A motion for leave to amend may be granted “whenever determination of a controversy on 

the merits will be facilitated thereby.” 16 C.F.R. § 3.15(a)(1). Granting the Consent Motions will 

facilitate a determination on the merits in this proceeding by narrowing the issues to be decided. 

The proposed amendment to each Answer will not cause prejudice to any party, and expediting the 

resolution of this matter is in the public interest. Microsoft and Activision acted promptly in 

bringing the Consent Motions and Complaint Counsel consents to the proposed amendments. 

Accordingly, the Consent Motions are GRANTED. It is ORDERED that Microsoft and 

Activision may each file the proposed Amended Answer and Defenses, attached as Exhibit B to 

the respective Consent Motions, as the operative Answer and Defenses in this matter, within five 

business days. 

D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

ORDERED:

Date: January 4, 2023 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 1/4/2023 | Document No. 606585 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *;
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 8064 

To authorize retail food stores and restaurants approved under the Food 

and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide meals for immediate consumption, 

and frozen prepacked meals, to recipients of benefits provided under 

such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 14, 2020 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To authorize retail food stores and restaurants approved 

under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide 

meals for immediate consumption, and frozen prepacked 

meals, to recipients of benefits provided under such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mobilizing Restaurants 

5 in America Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 8064 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF SUPPLEMENTAL NUTRITION ASSISTANCE 

2 PROGRAM BENEFITS DURING DECLARED 

3 EMERGENCIES TO PURCHASE MEALS FOR IM4 MEDIATE CONSUMPTION AND FROZEN 

5 PREPACKED MEALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—During an emergency declared 

7 under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et 

8 seq.) or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emer9 gency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.)— 

10 (1) the term ‘‘food’’, as defined in subsections 

11 (k)(1) and (o) of section 3 of the Food and Nutri12 tion Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2012), shall be deemed 

13 to include— 

14 (A) meals prepared by an approved retail 

15 food store, or approved restaurant, for imme16 diate consumption, and 

17 (B) meals frozen prepacked by an ap18 proved retail food store or approved restaurant; 

19 and 

20 (2) for purposes of such Act and this Act, the 

21 term ‘‘restaurant’’ means a facility that prepares 

22 and sells food directly to consumers for immediate 

23 consumption. 

24 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall apply to an 

25 approved restaurant during the emergency period notwith26 standing such restaurant’s participation in any State opVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:37 Sep 03, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H8064.IH H8064

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 8064 IH

1 tion restaurant program under subparagraph (3), (4), or 

2 (9) of section 3(k) the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 

3 (7 U.S.C. 2012(k)). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                            10,754
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    201,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                       4,218
<INVENTORY>                                       26,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 240,475
<PP&E>                                         3,390,976
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,856,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,822,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            301,522
<BONDS>                                          492,347
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          16,250
<OTHER-SE>                                       770,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,822,842
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 915,804
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    531,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                34,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  216,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                      82,275
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              134,685
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     134,685
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00
        


</TABLE>