Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [A-583-008]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily determines that Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang), a producer/exporter of merchandise subject to this administrative review, made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results of review.
 DATES: Applicable June 12, 2018.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Hoefke or Erin Kearney, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4947 or (202) 482-0167, respectively.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Background Commerce is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The period of review (POR) is May 1, 2016, to April 30, 2017. This review covers Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd. (Shin Yang) and Yieh Hsing Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Hsing). Commerce published the notice of initiation of this administrative review [1]
                    
                     on July 7, 2017.[2]
                    
                     The preliminary results are listed below in the section titled “Preliminary Results of Review.” On January 23, 2018, Commerce exercised its discretion to toll all deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal Government from January 20, 2018, through January 22, 2018.[3]
                    
                     The revised deadline for the final results of this review became February 5, 2018. On January 31, 2018, we extended the deadline for the preliminary results to May 14, 2018.[4]
                    
                     On May 8, 2018, we further extended the deadline for the preliminary results, until June 4, 2018.[5] For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.[6] Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is certain circular welded carbon steel pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The product is currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) item numbers 7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description remains dispositive.[7] Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) and (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value (NV) is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our 
                    ( print page 27312)
                    conclusions, 
                    *see*
                     the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
                    *via*
                     Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at 
                    *http://access.trade.gov*
                     and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at 
                    *http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​index.html.*
                     The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments On July 21, 2017, Yieh Hsing reported that it made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.[8]
                    
                     To confirm Yieh Hsing's claim of no shipments, Commerce issued an inquiry to CBP, requesting that it review Yieh Hsing's no-shipment claim.[9]
                    
                     CBP did not report that it had any information to contradict Yieh Hsing's claim of no shipments during the POR. Given that Yieh Hsing certified that it made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR, and there is no information calling its claim into question, we preliminarily determine that Yieh Hsing did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. Consistent with Commerce's practice, we will not rescind the review with respect to Yieh Hsing but, rather, will complete the review and issue instructions to CBP based on the final results.[10] Preliminary Results of the Review As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin exists for the period May 1, 2016, through April 30, 2017: Producer/exporter
Dumping
                             margin 
                             (percent)Shin Yang Steel Co., Ltd
6.26
 Disclosure and Public Comment Commerce intends to disclose to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results within five days of the date of publication of this notice.[11]
                    
                     Interested parties may submit cases briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[12]
                    
                     Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the due date for filing case briefs.[13]
                    
                     Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.[14]
                    
                     Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.[15]
                    
                     In order to be properly filed, ACCESS must successfully receive an electronically filed document in its entirety by 5 p.m. Eastern Time. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.[16]
                    
                     Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. Unless otherwise extended, Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review. If the weighted-average dumping margin for Shin Yang is not zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     in the final results, then Commerce will calculate importer-specific assessment rates. Because Shin Yang did not report the entered value of its sales, we will calculate importer-specific per-unit duty assessment rates by aggregating the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales of each importer and dividing each of these amounts by the total quantity (
                    *i.e.,*
                     weight) associated with those sales. To determine whether the importer-specific per-unit assessment rates are 
                    *de minimis,*
                     in accordance with the requirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will calculate importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     rates based on estimated entered values. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we will instruct CBP to liquidate without regard to antidumping duties all entries for which the importer-specific 
                    *ad valorem*
                     rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis.* With respect to Yieh Hsing, if we continue to find that Yieh Hsing had no shipments of subject merchandise in the final results, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any existing entries of merchandise produced by Yieh Hsing, but exported by other parties, at the rate for the intermediate reseller, if available, or at the all-others rate.[17] Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Shin Yang will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis*
                     within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for other manufacturers and 
                    ( print page 27313)
                    exporters covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which that manufacturer or exporter participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the manufacturer of subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 9.70 percent, the all-others rate in the LTFV investigation.[18]
                    
                     These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notifications This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 4, 2018. Gary Taverman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
 Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Comparisons to Normal Value 6. Date of Sale 7. Export Price 8. Normal Value 9. Currency Conversion 10. Recommendation


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         Wheatland Tube Company (the petitioner) requested the instant administrative review. 
                        *See*
                         Petitioner's Letter, “Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan Request for Administrative Review,” dated May 31, 2017. Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,*82 FR 31292, 31297 (July 6, 2017) (
                        *Initiation Notice*). Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,” dated January 23, 2018. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 3 days. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated January 31, 2017. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,” dated May 8, 2018. Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; 2016-2017,” dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         The complete description of the scope of the order appears in the memorandum, “Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; 2016-2017” (dated concurrently with this notice) (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         Yieh Hsing's Letter, “Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan; No Shipment Certification,” dated July 21, 2017. Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See*
                         “No Shipments Inquiry for Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan Produced and/or Exported by Yieh Hsing (A-583-008-003),” message number 7264308 (September 21, 2017). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g.,**Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of Review, Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2012-2013,*79 FR 15951, 15952 (March 24, 2014), unchanged in 
                        *Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments, and Partial Rescission of Review; 2012-2013,*
                         79 FR at 51306 (August 28, 2014). Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.224(b). Back to Citation
 12.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Back to Citation
 13.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(d). Back to Citation
 14.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Back to Citation
 15.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.303. Back to Citation
 16.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.310(c). Back to Citation
 17.
    
                         
                        *See, e.g.,**Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,*75 FR 26922, 26923 (May 13, 2010), unchanged in 
                        *Magnesium Metal from the Russian Federation: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,*75 FR 56989 (September 17, 2010). Back to Citation
 18.
    
                         
                        *See Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Antidumping Duty Order,*49 FR 19369 (May 7, 1984). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2018-12594 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P