alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED


PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) pertaining to the Cascade Bancorp 2008 Performance Incentive
Plan of our reports dated March 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Cascade Bancorp and subsidiary (collectively, “Cascade
Bancorp”) and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Cascade Bancorp included in Cascade Bancorp’s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2009.





/s/ Delap
LLP





Lake
Oswego, Oregon


March 12,
2010
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26660-26661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12326]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2018-OS-0033]


Notice of Availability of an Environmental Assessment Addressing 
Construction and Operation of a Fiscal Year 2019 General Purpose 
Warehouse at Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Red River, Texas

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of availability (NOA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DLA announces the availability of an Environmental Assessment 
(EA) documenting the potential environmental effects associated with 
the Proposed Action to construct and operate a Fiscal Year 2019 General 
Purpose Warehouse at DLA Distribution Red River, Texas, which is on Red 
River Army Depot.

DATES: The public comment period will end on July 9, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DOD-2018-OS-0033, to 
one of the following:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

[[Page 26661]]

    <bullet> Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Deputy Chief 
Management Officer, Directorate for Oversight and Compliance, 
Regulatory and Advisory Committee Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 
Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ira Silverberg at 571-767-0705 during 
normal business hours Monday through Friday, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m. (EDT) or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#93fae1f2bde0faffe5f6e1f1f6e1f4d3f7fff2bdfefaff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90f9e2f1bee3f9fce6f5e2f2f5e2f7d0f4fcf1befdf9fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EA has been prepared as required under 
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 32 Code of Federal 
Regulations part 651, Environmental Analysis of Army Actions, and DLA 
Regulation 1000.22, Environmental Considerations in Defense Logistics 
Agency Actions.
    The environmental assessment posted to the docket provides 
additional information about the proposed action.

    Dated: May 29, 2018.
Shelly E. Finke,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2018-12326 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Downey Financial Corp. ("Downey") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel D.
Rosenthal, Chief Executive Officer of Downey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Downey.



| | /s/ Daniel D.
  Rosenthal                  
| | -------------------------------------------
| |                                            
| | Date: March 1, 2007                        
| | President and Chief Executive
      Officer
|

| | Page | Navigation Links
| | ---- | ----------------

Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Downey Financial Corp. ("Downey") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian E. Côté,
Chief Financial Officer of Downey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)    The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Downey.



| | /s/ Brian E. Côté      
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Date: March 1, 2007    
| | Chief Financial Officer
|

| | Page | Navigation Links
| | ---- | ----------------
#### Beverly ANDERSON, Appellant, v. The GRAND UNION COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 70-126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 13, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Linda DICKERSON.

No. 61066.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

Cyrus J. Greco, Greco & Thomas, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ossie Brown, Dist. Atty., Warren Hebert, Marilyn C. Castle, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
federal trade commission

601 new jersey ave, nw

washington, dc

agenda

tuesday, january 8, 2008

9:00am Welcoming Remarks: James Kohm, Associate 

Director, Division of Enforcement, FTC [transcript]

9:10am Opening Remarks: Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman, FTC

[transcript]

9:20am Introduction to Advertising Law: Lesley Fair, Division of Consumer 

and Business Education, FTC [transcript]

9:35am Session 1: Market Overview — Current Practices for Carbon 

Offsets and RECs [transcript]

Panelists:

• Katherine Hamilton, Ecosystem Marketplace

• Lori Bird, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

• Rebecca Tushnet, Georgetown Law Center

• Alan Levy, Food and Drug Administration

Moderator:

Carolyn Hann, Division of Enforcement, FTC

10:55am Break

11:10am Session 2: Property Rights and Product Development — 

Economic Analysis [transcript]

Panelists:

• Matthew Kotchen, University of California, Santa Barbara

• Carolyn Fischer, Resources for the Future

Moderators:

James Hilger and Janis K. Pappalardo, Bureau of Economics, FTC

11:50am Lunch

carbon offsets &

renewable energy certificates
federal trade commission

601 new jersey ave, nw

washington, dc

1:00pm Session 3: Technical Substantiation Issues [transcript]

Panelists:

• Derik Broekhoff, World Resources Institute

• James Sullivan, Environmental Protection Agency

• Maurice LeFranc, Environmental Protection Agency

• Ed Holt, Ed Holt & Associates, Inc.

Moderator:

Hampton Newsome, Division of Enforcement, FTC

2:15pm Break

2:30pm Session 4: Certification Programs and Self-Regulatory Efforts

[transcript]

Panelists:

• Mario Teisl, University of Maine

• Jennifer Martin, Center For Resource Solutions

• Ian Carter, International Emissions Trading Association

Moderator:

Janice Frankle, Division of Enforcement, FTC

3:15pm Break

3:30pm Session 5: Roundtable Discussion on Consumer Protection 

Challenges and Need for FTC Guidance [transcript]

Panelists:

• Wiley Barbour, Environmental Resources Trust, Inc.

• Cameron Brooks, Renewable Choice Energy

• Matthew Clouse, EPA Green Power Partnership

• Anja Kollmus, Stockholm Environment Institute

• Steve Offutt, Carbonfund.org

• Urvashi Rangan, Consumers Union

• Rob Schasel, PepsiCo

• Adam Stern, TerraPass

• David A. Zonana, California Department of Justice

Moderators:

Laura DeMartino and Hampton Newsome, Division of Enforcement, FTC

5:00pm End of Day
No. 00-617.

#### International Aircraft Recovery, LLC *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Case 2:22-cv-04260 Document 2-7 Filed 07/20/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 246 

ATTACHMENT G 

Website Notice 
 

 

 

 

Case 2:22-cv-04260 Document 2-7 Filed 07/20/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 247 

IMPORTANT: You May be Eligible for a Refund from Harris Jewelry/CACUSA 

Because of a recent settlement with the Federal Trade Commission and a group of State 

Attorneys General,* you may be eligible for a refund from Harris Jewelry. 

You may be able to get a full refund of the amount you paid for a Lifetime Jewelry and 

Watch Protection Plan. Additionally, if you currently have an outstanding debt to 

Harris/CACUSA, you don’t have to make any more payments. Your account balance is now $0. 

Don’t wait, apply for your refund now. Click here and enter your name and contact 

information. 

Harris Jewelry will be closing down soon and is no longer accepting requests for jewelry 

repair, battery replacement, and other services covered by the Protection Plan. 

If you have questions, please call Harris Jewelry at 1-800-989-7732, Monday through Friday 

from 9:00am – 5:30pm EST or email info@harrisjewelry.com. 

To learn more about the settlement, read the Federal Trade Commission’s press release 

[embedded link] or call the New York State Attorney General’s Office at (315) 523-6080. 

* The Attorneys General of the states of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, 

Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, 

Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington, and the Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection (“State 

Attorneys General”).
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 1 of 17 PageID 93
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 2 of 17 PageID 94
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 3 of 17 PageID 95
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 4 of 17 PageID 96
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 5 of 17 PageID 97
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 6 of 17 PageID 98
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 7 of 17 PageID 99
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 8 of 17 PageID 100
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 9 of 17 PageID 101
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 10 of 17 PageID 102
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 11 of 17 PageID 103
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 12 of 17 PageID 104
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 13 of 17 PageID 105
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 14 of 17 PageID 106
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 15 of 17 PageID 107
Case 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 16 of 17 PageID 108
ACase 8:22-cv-00868-KKM-AEP Document 12 Filed 05/04/22 Page 17 of 17 PageID 109
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

October 9, 2014

Amanda Wait, Esq.

Hunton & Williams LLP

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

Re: In the Matter of Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc., 

Docket No. C-4423.

Dear Ms. Wait:

This is in reference to the Petition For Approval of Proposed Divestiture filed by Service 

Corporation International (“SCI”) and received on July 24, 2014 (“Petition”). Pursuant to the 

Decision and Order in Docket No. C-4423, SCI requests prior Commission approval of its proposal to divest certain assets to Alliance Funeral Group, Inc. (“Alliance”).

After consideration of SCI’s Petition and other available information, the Commission 

has determined to approve the proposed divestiture as set forth in the Petition. In according its 

approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and the representations 

made by SCI and Alliance in connection with SCI’s Petition and has assumed them to be accurate and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Paul Houston
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 803 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit prescription 

drug plan sponsors and MA–PD organizations under the Medicare program from retroactively reducing payment on clean claims submitted 

by pharmacies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2019 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mrs. RODGERS of Washington, and Mr. COLLINS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

prescription drug plan sponsors and MA–PD organizations under the Medicare program from retroactively reducing payment on clean claims submitted by pharmacies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Trans5 parency and Accuracy in Medicare Part D Spending Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 803 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEDICARE PDP SPONSORS AND MA– 

2 PD ORGANIZATIONS FROM RETROACTIVELY 

3 REDUCING PAYMENT ON CLEAN CLAIMS SUB4 MITTED BY PHARMACIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–12(b)(4)(A) of 

6 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–112(b)(4)(A)) 

7 is amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(iv) PROHIBITING RETROACTIVE RE9 DUCTIONS IN PAYMENTS ON CLEAN

10 CLAIMS.—Each contract entered into with 

11 a PDP sponsor under this part with re12 spect to a prescription drug plan offered 

13 by such sponsor shall provide that after 

14 the date of receipt of a clean claim sub15 mitted by a pharmacy, the PDP sponsor 

16 (or an agent of the PDP sponsor) may not 

17 retroactively reduce payment on such claim 

18 directly or indirectly through aggregated 

19 effective rate or otherwise except in the 

20 case such claim is found to not be a clean 

21 claim (such as in the case of a claim lack22 ing required substantiating documentation) 

23 during the course of a routine audit as 

24 permitted pursuant to written agreement 

25 between the PDP sponsor (or such an 

26 agent) and such pharmacy. The previous 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 803 IH

1 sentence shall not prohibit any retroactive 

2 increase in payment to a pharmacy pursu3 ant to a written agreement between a PDP 

4 sponsor (or an agent of such sponsor) and 

5 such pharmacy.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered 

8 into on or after January 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### In the matter of THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner.

No. 38590.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 5, 1969.

Marshall M. Criser, Palm Beach, as President and Marshall R. Cassedy, Tallahassee as Executive Director, for the Petition.

William J. McLeod, St. Petersburg, Chairman Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee of The Florida Bar.

Delbridge L. Gibbs of Marks, Gray, Yates, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for The Florida Land Title Association.

J. Kenneth Ballinger, Tallahassee, for the Florida Association of Realtors.

ADKINS, Justice.

The Petition of the Florida Bar to amend Section 3, of Article XVI of the Integration Rule of the Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A., is granted and said Section 3 as previously adopted is hereby amended by striking said Section and inserting in lieu thereof new section 3, Article XVI of the Integration Rule, reading as follows, viz:

> Section 3, Article XVI, Integration Rule of the Florida Bar

> 3. (a) It shall be the duty of each committee to investigate, with dispatch, all reports of the unauthorized practice of law, and to make prompt written report of its investigation and findings to the Board of Governors. The Board of Governors shall receive and evaluate the committee reports and determine whether or not a complaint should be filed against any alleged offender. All such complaints shall be by written petition filed in this Court by The Florida Bar and in its name.

> (b) Upon receiving a written application of the President of The Florida Bar, or the Chairman of the Standing Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law, alleging facts indicating that a person, firm or corporation is or may be unlawfully practicing law and that the .issuance of a subpoena is necessary for the investigation of such unauthorized practice, the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida shall issue subpoenas in the name of the Chief Justice for the attendance of witnesses and production of books and papers before the investigating circuit committee designated in such application at the time and place within its circuit designated by the investigating circuit committee. Such subpoenas shall be returnable to the Circuit Court of the residence or place of business of the person subpoenaed.

> (c) A like subpoena shall issue upon application by any person, firm or corporation under investigation.

> (d) Failure to comply with any subpoena shall constitute a contempt of the Supreme Court of Florida, and may be punished by it or by the Circuit Court of the Circuit to which the subpoena is returnable or where the contemnor may be found. The Circuit Courts to which the subpoenas are returnable shall have power to enter such protective orders as may be necessary for the enforcement of said subpoenas.

> (e) Each Circuit Committee conducting preliminary investigations is *666empowered to take and transcribe the evidence of witnesses who may be sworn by any person authorized by law to administer oaths.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 3/15/2023 | Document No. 607216 | PAGE Page 1 of 1 * PUBLIC *; 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of 

Microsoft Corp., 

 a corporation, and 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., 

 a corporation, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

)

) 

) Docket No. 9412 

)

) 

) 

) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On March 13, 2023, non-party Cornerstone Research filed a motion to extend the time for 

it to file a motion to quash or limit a subpoena served on Cornerstone Research by Respondent 

Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”) (“Motion”). Cornerstone Research states that Activision 

and Cornerstone Research are engaged in ongoing negotiations as to the scope of the requested 

document production and that further negotiations may narrow or eliminate areas of dispute. 

Cornerstone Research further states that Activision agrees to the extension requested in the 

Motion. 

Upon review and consideration of the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that Cornerstone Research’s deadline to file a motion to quash or limit Activision’s 

subpoena is extended to March 23, 2023. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 15, 2023
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants The Board of Directors
SystemOne Technologies Inc.: We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (No. 333-70379) on Form S-8 of SystemOne Technologies Inc. of our
report dated March 6, 2004, except as to Notes 2 and 13, which are as of March 15,
2004, relating to the financial statements, which appears in the annual report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 of SystemOne Technologies
Inc. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Companys
ability to continue as a going concern. /s/  BDO Seidman, LLP Miami, Florida
March 24, 2004
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7645 

To extend the time period for making coronavirus-related distributions from 

retirement plans and to provide an exclusion from gross income of 

coronavirus-related distributions which are first-time homebuyer distributions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2020 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the time period for making coronavirus-related 

distributions from retirement plans and to provide an 

exclusion from gross income of coronavirus-related distributions which are first-time homebuyer distributions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Time Homebuyer 

5 Pandemic Savings Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7645 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR MAKING 

2 CORONAVIRUS-RELATED DISTRIBUTIONS 

3 FROM RETIREMENT PLANS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2202(a)(4)(A)(i) of the 

5 CARES Act is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2020’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2021’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to distributions made after Decem9 ber 31, 2020. 

10 SEC. 3. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF 

11 CORONAVIRUS-RELATED DISTRIBUTIONS 

12 WHICH ARE FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER DIS13 TRIBUTIONS. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2202(a) of the CARES 

15 Act is amended by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraph: 

17 ‘‘(7) EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF

18 CORONAVIRUS-RELATED DISTRIBUTIONS WHICH ARE

19 FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYER DISTRIBUTIONS.— 

20 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Gross income shall 

21 not include any coronavirus-related distribution 

22 which is a qualified first-time homebuyer dis23 tribution (as defined in section 72(t)(8)(A) of 

24 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986). 

25 ‘‘(B) DOLLAR LIMITATION.—The aggre26 gate amount taken into account as qualified 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7645 IH

1 first-time homebuyer distributions by any indi2 vidual under subparagraph (A) for any taxable 

3 year shall not exceed the excess (if any) of— 

4 ‘‘(i) $25,000, over 

5 ‘‘(ii) the aggregate amount so taken 

6 into account in all prior taxable years.’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

9 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7790 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal chapter 35 (relating 

to taxes on wagering). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2020 

Ms. TITUS (for herself and Mr. RESCHENTHALER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

chapter 35 (relating to taxes on wagering). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 35 of subtitle D of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is repealed. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

8 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS