alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         3,253
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,085,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,211,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        666,617
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     513,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,211,225
<SALES>                                        122,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,472
<CGS>                                          68,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  68,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (376)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             28,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                32,295
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            32,295
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,408)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   28,887
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.03





</TABLE>
# EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstHartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Neil H.Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:
    -  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
    -  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

                /s/NeilH. Ellis                  

NeilH. Ellis

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

 

Date:October 6, 2008
Exhibit 32.01




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Benihana Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Stockinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard C. StockingerRichard C. StockingerChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of SCOLR Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|               |  |  | 
|March 24, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Richard M. Levy    
|Date           |  |  |  |     |  | Richard M. Levy,       
|               |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### SELIGMAN OF FLORIDA, INC., d/b/a Applegreen Condominium Apartments, Appellant, v. Edward F. RUGG and Helen P. Rugg, his wife, Appellees.

No. 77-826.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 14, 1978.

Jeffrey S. Altman and Chad P. Pugatch, of Goldberg, Young, Goldberg & Borkson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Herbert A. Warren, Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellees sued for specific performance or in the alternative to recover their deposits on two condominium apartments. Ap-pellees abandoned the count for specific performance and the trial court found for the appellees on the second count for restitution.

We have fully considered appellant’s contentions but find on this record that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, C. J., ANSTEAD, J., and SIL-VERTOOTH, LYNN N., Associate Judge, concur.
>>> "Baldi, Sara Marie" <SaraMarie.Baldi@genon.com> 11/20/2012 8:16 AM >>>

Good morning, TJ

Mark & I had the usual Monday “fires” to address yesterday but confirmed with him this morning that the presentation and the cost

of the piping no longer need to remain as CBI. However, please be aware that the estimated cost of the piping is solely for the

piping.

Please feel free to contac t me with any questions.

Sara Marie

GenOn Energy

Env Operations & Compliance

work: 724

- 597

- 8633

cell: 724

- 263

- 9276

From: Thomas Finseth [mailto:Thomas.Finseth@erg.com]

Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 10:09 PM

To: alicea.jezebele@epa.gov; Baldi, Sara Marie

Cc: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov; Jacklin, Mark J

Subject: RE: Draft Keystone Site Visit Notes

Hi Sara Marie,

Just following up on the potential CBI claim. Please let me know as soon as you can.

Thanks,

TJ

>>> "Baldi, Sara Marie" <SaraMarie.Baldi@genon.com> 11/16/2012 10:28 AM >>>

Good morning, T.J.

I need to confer with Mark and others as to whether these should remain as CBI. Mark is out of the office today, but will ge t back

to you on Monday when he is back in the office.

Have a great weekend.

Sara Marie

GenOn Energy

Env Operations & Compliance

work: 724

- 597

- 8633

cell: 724

- 263

- 9276

From: Thomas Finseth [mailto:Thomas.Finseth@erg.com]

Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 9:58 AM

To: alicea.jezebel e@epa.gov; Baldi, Sara Marie

Cc: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov; Jacklin, Mark J

Subject: RE: Draft Keystone Site Visit Notes

Sara Marie,

Thank you for providing responses to the questions included in the notes. I have reviewed your responses and have j ust a couple

questions/requests.

1) Please confirm whether the presentation included in the attachments needs to be held as confidential business information (CBI).

2) Please confirm that the estimated cost of the piping provided in res ponse to our question is not considered CBI.

Thanks again.

TJ Finseth
PDNo.

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ATAUSTIN

INIUBONG EBONG, Petitioner

THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### COURTOFCRPINA! A5*r*» <i 

### MAY 12 2015 

### Abel Acosta, Glei*
FILED IN OURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS 

### MAY 12 2015 Aoei Acosta, Clerk



### On Petition for Discretionary Review ofthe Fourteenth Court ofAppeals, 

### Cause No. 14-14-00070-CR, Affirming Judgment and Sentence ofTrial Court Number: 1374974 in the 351stJudicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.

PETITIONER EBONG'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ONLY ORIGINAL COPY OF HIS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: 

### COMES NOW, Iniubong Ebong, TDCJ-CID#01908828, your Petitioner, 

### proceeding inpro se, in the above-styled and yet to be numbered cause, respectfully moves 

### this Honorable Court to grant leave to file the original copy only of his Petition for Discretionary Review. In support thereof, Petitioner would show the Court as follows: I. 

### 1. The style and appeal number of his appeal Iniubong Ebong v. State of Texas, No. 14-14-00070-CR affirmed on April 09, 2015, in the Fourteenth Court ofAppeals. 

### 2. The Petitioner moves the Court, pursuant to Rule 2, Texas Rules of 

### Appellate Procedure, to suspend Rule 9.3(b), of the Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, which requires the filing ofeleven (11) copies ofthe PDR with the Court. 

### The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request is as follows: The Petitioner is indigent, incarcerated and does not have access to a photocopier for reproduction ofthe requite copies of the opinion for the 

### Fourth Court of Appeals affirming his judgment and sentence. The Appellant is presently not represented by counsel and will be filing apro se Petition for Discretionary Review. Accordingly, the Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant leave to file an original copy only ofhis Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court. SIGNED on this the 6th day ofMay 2015. Respectfully submitted,

Petitioner, Pro se [908828 

### Poluns^fy Unit 3872 FM 350 South Livingston, Texas 77351-8580CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I, Iniubong Ebong, TDCJ-CID#01908828, Petitioner, pro se, herein certify that a true and correct copy ofthis instrument was sent to the Office ofthe Criminal District Attorney for Harris County, Texas and to the Office ofthe State Prosecuting Attorney, by 

### placing same, in a U.S. mail box, first-class, postage paid, on this the 6th day ofMay, 2015.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe annual report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward K. Zinser, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        | /s/ Edward K. Zinser                                                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Edward K. Zinser  Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer  June 7, 2006 |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                 1,224,812
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          5,149,129
<ALLOWANCES>                             220,410
<INVENTORY>                            4,893,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      13,022,104
<PP&E>                                73,096,030
<DEPRECIATION>                        33,188,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        80,332,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 15,597,541
<BONDS>                               20,171,902
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                               1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                            39,750,348
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          80,332,191
<SALES>                               16,907,133
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      34,599,236
<CGS>                                 15,321,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         16,990,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,480,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (193,658)
<INCOME-TAX>                             268,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      486,066
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             486,066
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .72
                                   


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130100(73)(74) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PHILIP ROBERTSON and Justices SHARON ROBERTSON, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 130100 COA: 254052 St. Clair CC: 01-001223-NO BLUE WATER OIL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s October 27, 2006 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.

W EAVER , J., would grant reconsideration a nd, on reconsideration, would grant leave to appeal and ask the par ties to brief the issue whether Mann v Shusteric Enterprises Inc, 470 Mich 320 (2004), was correctly decided.

M ARKMAN , J., would grant reconsid eration and, on recons ideration, would grant defendant’s application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in Robertson v Blue Water Oil Co, 477 Mich 897 (2006).

d0122 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 29, 2007

Clerk
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                  May 16, 2005

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits
---------   ---------------------------------

          The following exhibit is included with this Report:

          Exhibit 99.1   Press release, dated May 16, 2005, announcing
                         earnings of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
                         for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: May 16, 2005                          By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
#### Clarence JACOBIE, Petitioner, v. MULLET INN et al., Respondents.

No. 39611.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Petition denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18


                                   EXHIBIT A
                                   ---------

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$72,495                                                            March 5, 1999


For value received, the undersigned promises to pay to Therasense, Inc., a
California corporation (the "Company"), or order, at its principal office the
principal sum of $72,495.00 without interest. Said principal shall be due on the
earlier of March 5, 2003, or (ii) the undersigned's termination of employment
with or services to the Company.

Should suit be commenced to collect this Note or any portion thereof, such sum
as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees. The
maker waives presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest, and notice of
non-payment of this Note.

This Note is secured by a pledge of 289,980 shares of Common Stock of the
Company, pursuant to the provisions of the Common Stock Purchase and Security
Agreement between the Company and the undersigned executed contemporaneously
with this Note.

The holder of this Note shall have full recourse against the maker, and shall
not be required to proceed against the Shares or other collateral securing this
Note in the event of default.

                                             /s/ W. Mark Lortz
                                             ---------------------------
                                             W. Mark Lortz
SNODGRASS

Certified Public
Accountants and Consultants

EXHIBIT 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary as of June 30, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, and the
consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review
of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented herein); and in our report dated February 26, 2009 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|Wheeling, West Virginia  
|August 12, 2008          

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

              Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings


Computation of Earnings Per Share
---------------------------------

The following formula was used to calculate the earnings per share, Consolidated
Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2000 and
1999, included in this report as Exhibit 13.3.


Earnings Per Share

Net Income /
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for the period

                                   Three months ended
                                     September 30,
                                  --------------------
                                  2000            1999
                                  ----            ----
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding              1,508,526      1,508,526

Net Income                        603,940        566,517

Per Share Amount                      .40            .38


                                    Nine months ended
                                      September 30,
                                  --------------------
                                  2000            1999
                                  ----            ----
Weighted Average
Shares Outstanding              1,508,526      1,508,526

Net Income                      1,748,343      1,858,923

Per Share Amount                     1.16           1.23



No common stock equivalents exist.