alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,712
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    117,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,473
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         73,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                         1,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,987
<SALES>                                         52,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,623
<CGS>                                           44,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,865
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   255
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  91
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,429
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,329
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles FORT v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60595.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 11, 1977.

In re: Charles Fort, applying for remedial writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. There is no merit in this application.
#### Eugene K. TURRENTINE, Appellant, v. JOHN TURRENTINE, INC., a Florida corporation, and John W. Turrentine et al., Appellees.

No. 2320.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 26, 1969.

Hal H. McCaghren, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

H. David Faust of Burns, Middleton, Rogers, Farrell & Faust, Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, the plaintiff below, presents for review an order of the trial court dated 12 April 1968 dismissing the cause for want of prosecution under Rule 1.420(e), RCP (as amended to 1 January 1967) 30 F.S.A., and an order of the trial court dated 4 June 1968 which denied the appellant’s petition to reinstate the cause. The order of 12 April 1968 dismissed the cause “with prejudice” for failure to prosecute.

Based upon our review of the record, the briefs, and the oral arguments of the parties, we are of the opinion that the order of 12 April 1968 properly dismissed the cause for failure to prosecute, but improperly dismissed the cause with prejudice. See May v. State ex rel. Ervin, Fla.1957, 96 So.2d 126. For this reason, the order is hereby modified to eliminate the words “with prejudice.” As thus modified, the said order is hereby affirmed. With respect to the order of 4 June 1968 denying the appellant’s petition to reinstate the cause, it is our opinion, that no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated m connection with the entry of said order, and it is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dan K. Wassong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: August 12, 2003

                                             /S/ DAN K. WASSONG
                                             ------------------
                                                Dan K. Wassong
                                                Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 1 96

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Comments on the I itle V Permit 

Fact Sheet 

Background Section, Paragraph 1 

Title V permits are required for al! incinerators that are regulated under 

Subpart EEE not because the facility emits large amounts of pollution. 

Also the permit regulates emissions specified by regulation not the amount 

of pollution the facility can emit. 

Background Section, Paragraph 2 

This paragraph is not relevant to this renewal permit so why have this 

paragraph in the Fact Sheet. 

Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 4 

Modify second sentence to read "Carbon adsorption units are attached to 

each tank to help control emissions." Delete "gases occasionally escape 

from the tanks." 

Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 5 

Modify to state "is maintained at negative pressure to minimize emissions" 

instead of "is maintained at negative pressure so emissions don't escape." 

Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 5 

Reword last sentence to read "Before some containerized waste is 

incinerated it is packaged into more manageable containers." 

Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 7 

Last Line. Should state "baghouses" not a "baghouse" and delete "which 

help control air pollution." 

Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 8 

First sentence, delete "to further help control air pollution." 

Burning Hazardous Waste, Paragraph 9 

Second sentence, delete "as lime is an important material in this air 

pollution control technology."
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                         [DELOITTE & TOUCHE LETTERHEAD]




                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-59686 of Etablissements Delhaize Freres et Cie "Le Lion" S.A. on
Form S-8 of our report dated April 2, 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Etablissements Delhaize Freres et Cie "Le Lion" S.A. for the year
ended December 31, 2000.

Brussels, June 28, 2001



/s/ James Fulton
--------------------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
Reviseurs d'Enterprises SC s.f.d. SCRL
Represented by James Fulton


                                      E-26
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0430

SAT Date: 7/6/2012

Print Date: 7/30/2012

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG, ONCO-LUNG

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0430

FATE: 

S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1
*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes based on physical/chemical 

properties. There is concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

information for other poorly soluble respirable particulates and concern for oncogenicity if 

inhaled based on the expected .

 

 Moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR 

chemical class = MW > 100,000; S < 0.001 mg/L (P); pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness 

<150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

To the Board of Directors

Vital Signs, Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports dated November 14, 2006 included in this Form 10-K, on the consolidated financial statements of Vital Signs, Inc. as of September 30, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the three years ended September 30, 2006 and on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2006, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-40586, 33-43702, 33-47298, 33-73800, 333-09705, 333-37927, 333-111807 and 333-111808).

**GOLDSTEIN GOLUB KESSLER LLP**

New York, New York

December 12, 2006
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Wilkow Venture (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marc R. Wilkow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Marc R. Wilkow

Marc R. Wilkow
Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2798

In Re: EDWARD R. BUTLER,

Debtor.

_________________________

EDWARD R. BUTLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT B. SCARLETT,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 95-2808

In Re: EDWARD R. BUTLER,

Debtor.

_________________________

EDWARD R. BUTLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
2

ROBERT B. SCARLETT,

Defendant - Appellee,

TERRY L. MUSIKA, U. S. Trustee,

Trustee - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge.

(CA-95-2192-H, CA-95-2217-H, BK-90-3087-5-JS)

Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: March 28, 1996

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward R. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen Howard Meredith, ILIF

& MEREDITH, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland; Terry L. Musika, UNITED

STATES TRUSTEE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing

as untimely his appeals from the bankruptcy court's orders and

denying his motions for reconsideration. Appellant moved for a stay

of all action on these appeals pending the outcome of an unrelated

adversary proceeding. Because any decision in that case will not

affect these appeals, we deny Appellant's motions for a stay. Appellee Scarlett moved to dismiss these appeals as untimely; however, Appellant timely noted his appeals from the district court's

orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a). Therefore,

we deny Appellee Scarlett's motions to dismiss the appeals. We have

reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no

abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Butler v. Scarlett, Nos.

CA-95-2192-H; CA-95-2217-H (D. Md. Aug. 17, 1995; Sept. 18 & 19,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Wayne COLLUM, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39764.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur.
#### Ex parte Holly GOLDEN, a/k/a Holly Goeden.

77-754.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 15, 1978.

FAULKNER, Justice.

Writ denied.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                               MERIDIAN DATA, INC.
                             Financial Data Schedule
                           Article 5 of Regulation SX

This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements

CATEGORY                               RESPONSE
---------------              ------------------
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                0000864568
<NAME>                       Meridian Data, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                               1000
<CURRENCY>                           US dollars
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1996
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                   24,809
<SECURITIES>                             14,340
<RECEIVABLES>                             3,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                512
<INVENTORY>                               1,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         43,775
<PP&E>                                    1,327
<DEPRECIATION>                              674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           45,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     4,015
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 69,578
<OTHER-SE>                                    5
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             41,230
<SALES>                                  26,116
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         26,116
<CGS>                                    10,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            10,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         13,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           4,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       4,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                              4,274
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.44
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)September 4, 2015(Date of earliest event reported)September 3, 2015





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn September 3, 2015, we and ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) announced we will participate at the Barclays CEO Energy Conference in New York City, September 8-9, 2015.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on both ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ websites,www.oneok.comandwww.oneokpartners.com.The presentation will be posted on the websites that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated September 3, 2015.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:September 4, 2015By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated September 3, 2015.











4