alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 4.19

                          ACTION BY CONSENT IN WRITING
                            OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                               OF RNETHEALTH, INC.

     The undersigned being all of the Directors of RNETHEALTH, INC., a Colorado
corporation (the "Company") hereby consents to the following action of this
corporation, to be effective as of June 23, 2001, in lieu of a meeting.

                AMENDMENT TO THE 2001 STOCK COMPENSATION PLAN AND
                 FILING OF A S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT

         BE IT RESOLVED, that the 2001 Stock Compensation Plan of the Company
(the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

            "The authorized number of shares for issuance under the Plan shall
not exceed 11,958,232."

     The amended Plan shall be registered under Form S-8, effective July 3,
2001.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each Director of Rnethealth, Inc. has executed this
unanimous consent in a separate original document, and all original documents
signed individually by the Directors shall together constitute one original
Unanimous Consent.

                                              /s/ WENDY BOROW JOHNSON
                                              -------------------------------
                                              Wendy Borow Johnson
                                              Secretary

                                              /s/ ROBERT PORTRIE
Dated as of June 29, 2001                     -------------------------------
                                              Robert Portrie, Chairman

                                              /s/ WENDY BOROW JOHNSON
Dated as of June 29, 2001                     -------------------------------
                                              Wendy Borow Johnson

                                              /s/ MARK GOLD
Dated as of June 29, 2001                     -------------------------------
                                              Mark Gold

                                              /s/ W. THOMAS OLIVER
Dated as of June 29, 2001                     -------------------------------
                                              W. Thomas Oliver
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10(nn)
                                                                       conformed

                   AMENDMENT NUMBER 3 TO INVESTMENT AGREEMENT


            Reference is hereby made to the Investment Agreement, dated as of
February 23, 1998 (the "Agreement"), between TPG Partners II, L.P. (the
"Investor") and Oxford Health Plans, Inc. (the "Company"), as such agreement has
been amended. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

            The Investor and the Company, pursuant to, and in accordance with,
Section 11.07 and Section 6.01 (c)(iv) of the Agreement, hereby agree to amend
the Agreement by adding the following new subsection (e) to Section 6.01:

            "(e) Nothing contained in this Section 6.01 shall prohibit any
individual who is an Affiliate of the Investor from acquiring Beneficial
Ownership of shares of Common Stock; provided, that the aggregate number of
shares of Common Stock acquired by all such individuals pursuant to this Section
6.01 (e) shall not exceed 2,000,000."

            This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by
the different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which when so
executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which constitute one and
the same instrument.

            This Amendment shall become effective upon the receipt by the
Investor and the Company of all required approvals from state regulatory
agencies. The Company and the Investor shall use their best efforts to obtain
such approvals, and the Company shall promptly notify the Investor of the
receipt of such approvals.

            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as
of November 19, 1998.


                                          TPG PARTNERS II, L.P.


                                          By:  /s/ Jonathan J. Coslet
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Name: Jonathan J. Coslet
                                               Title: Principal



                                          OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC.


                                          By:  /s/ Jeffery H. Boyd
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Name: Jeffery H. Boyd
                                               Title: Executive Vice President,
                                                      General Counsel
<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Falcon Products,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Franklin A. Jacobs, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  September 14, 2004                          /s/ Franklin A. Jacobs
                                                   ----------------------
                                                   Franklin A. Jacobs
                                                   Chairman of the Board and
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment Trust
      of
      New Jersey (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2006
      (the “Report”), I, Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1)   the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and,





(2)   the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                March 13, 2006
            /s/
                Robert S. HekemianRobert
                S. HekemianChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive
                Officer
* Pursuan t to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



### No. 98-30563

LUTHER HUNT; ROBERT LECOMPT; LANDON ALEXANDER, JR.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus MICHAEL I. BERNSTEIN; ET AL.,

Defendants,

RICHARD WINGATE; BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

(97-CV-1103)

September 13, 1999
Before POLITZ, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *



### Plaintiffs-appellants appeal th e dismissal of their action. Having considered the

briefs, oral arguments of counsel, and all relevant matters of record considered by the district

court in determining the court’s jurisdiction in this matter, and finding no reversible error,

the rulings by the district court are AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 08, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 08, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0153. IN THE INTEREST OF: M. S., A CHILD.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: JUV141034
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 2, 2014














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---




Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of June 30, 2014 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$8,953Sub-advised funds580Institutional Accounts4,671Total$14,204





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,557Small-Mid Cap1,036Large Cap7,207Select (All Cap)394Long-Short3,774Strategic Income236Total$14,204








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:July 2, 2014By:/s/ James F. LairdJames F. Laird, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Jump to main content.

STORET/ WQX

Recent Additions | Contact Us**Search:**All EPA

    - You are here:  EPA Home
    - Water
    - OWOW
    - AWPD
    - STORET/ WQX

## Welcome to STORET and WQX, EPA's repository and framework for sharing water monitoring data.

The STORET (short for STOrage and RETrieval) Data Warehouse is a repository for water quality, biological, and physical data and is used by state environmental agencies, EPA and other federal agencies, universities, private citizens, and many others.  Take a minute to browse around our site or click on the water drop to retrieve monitoring data!
**
About STORET/ WQX    |    Support for Data Owners    |    Obtaining Water Quality Data   |     Useful Links   |     Commonly Asked Questions

If you have a question or comments on this website or on the STORET system,please call STORET User Assistance at 1-800-424-9067, or send us an email at STORET@epa.gov.
**

**Local Navigation- 
About STORET/ WQX
- 
Data download 
- 
Online Tutorials
- 
Data Submittal
- 
Useful Internet Links
- 
 Support
- 
Tools/ Web Services 
- 
Frequent Questions
- 
EPA Home
|		
Privacy and Security Notice
|				
Contact Us 

http://www.epa.gov/storet/

Print As-Is

Last updated on Monday, November 02, 2009
- Share   - Del.icio.us
  - Digg
  - Facebook
  - StumbleUpon
  - What is this?

Jump to main content.
**
AFS-11-095-E 

Jan 20 2011 

 Exemption No. 3585R 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9379 

Mr. Paul W. Railsback 

Director of Operations 

Air Transport Association of America, Inc. 

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20004 

Dear Mr. Railsback: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 3585, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 20, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Air Transport Association of America, Inc. (ATA), for an extension of 

Exemption No. 3585, as amended. That exemption from §§ 121.613, 121.619(a), and 

121.625 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows ATA-member airlines and other 

similarly situated part 121 operators to continue to dispatch airplanes under instrument flight 

rules when conditional language in a one-time increment of the weather forecast states that 

the weather at the destination, alternate airport, or both airports could be below the authorized 

weather minimums when other time increments of the weather forecast state the weather 

conditions will be at or above the authorized weather minimums. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 
 2

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ATA. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 3585, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 3585, as amended, to 

May 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of DirectorsDowney Financial
Corp.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (No. 333-30483) on Form S-8 and (No.
333-50416 and No. 333-79835) on Form S-3 of Downey Financial Corp. and subsidiaries of our reports
dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Downey Financial Corp. and subsidiares as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders
equity and cash flows, for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2007, annual report
on Form 10-K of Downey Financial Corp.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Costa Mesa, CaliforniaFebraury 28,
2008

| |  | Navigation Links
| |  | ----------------
#### Joseph C. McKAHAND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39712.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Certiorari dismissed. 234 So.2d 423.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 50004 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ANTOINE DARREN BREWER

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 468

- 1

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Antoine Darren

Brewer has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632
F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Brewer has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well

as Brewer ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 3, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-50004 Document: 00515021434 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/03/2019No. 19

- 50004

2 presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s

mo tion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-50004 Document: 00515021434 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/03/2019
EX-10.80




 Exhibit 10.80 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO THE WEBMD HEALTH CORP. SUPPLEMENTAL BONUS PROGRAM

 TRUST AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT is made to be effective as of January 9, 2012: 
 WHEREAS,
WebMD Health Corp. (the “Company”) and Peter Anevski (the “Trustee”) are parties to the WebMD Health Corp. Supplemental Bonus Program Trust Agreement (as Amended and Restated Effective as of March 15, 2008) (the “Trust
Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Trust Agreement established a Governing Committee comprised of Wayne Gattinella and Anthony
Vuolo; 
 WHERES, due to organizational changes, the members of the Governing Committee are being changed; and 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Trustee have the right to amend the Trust Agreement on behalf of the Company from time to time. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

1. 
 The
“Governing Committee” shall be comprised of Anthony Vuolo and Douglas Wamsley, or any successors as may be appointed by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of WebMD Health Corp. in the future. 

2. 
 Except as
provided herein, the provisions of the Trust Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the
undersigned has duly executed this Amendment to be effective as of the day and year first written above. 
  

					
	TRUSTEE	 		 	WEBMD HEALTH CORP.
			
	        /s/ Peter Anevski	 		 	        /s/ Douglas W. Wamsley
	Peter Anevski	 		 	Douglas W. Wamsley
		 		 	EVP & General Counsel
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3499

___________

Janice Smith, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

* District of Arkansas.

Robbins Hardwood Flooring, Inc., also *

known as Robbins Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: July 30, 1999

Filed: August 13, 1999 

___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Janice Smith appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on

Smith's race and sex-based employment discrimination claims. Having reviewed the

record and the parties' briefs, we see no error by the district court. Assuming for the

purpose of our review that Smith established the elements of a prima facie case, we

conclude there is no substantial evidence in the record tending to show that Robbins

Hardwood Flooring's decision to discharge Smith for insubordinate conduct was a

pretext for race and sex discrimination. We also conclude that an extended discussion
-2-

is unnecessary in this fact intensive case. We thus affirm the district court without

further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 3/10/2023 | DOCUMENT NO. 607159 | Page 1 of 1 | PUBLIC

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Microsoft Corp., )

 a corporation, and ) 

) Docket No. 9412 

Activision Blizzard, Inc., )

 a corporation, ) 

) 

Respondents. ) 

__________________________________________) 

ORDER GRANTING THIRD AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On March 9, 2023, non-party Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (“Take-Two”) filed a 

third motion to extend the time for it to file a motion to quash or limit a subpoena served on 

Take-Two by Federal Trade Commission Complaint Counsel (“Motion”). Take-Two states that 

Complaint Counsel and Take-Two are engaged in ongoing negotiations as to the scope of the 

requested document production and that further negotiations may narrow or eliminate areas of 

dispute. Take-Two further states that Complaint Counsel agrees to the extension requested in the 

Motion. 

Upon review and consideration of the Motion, the Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that Take-Two’s deadline to file a motion to quash or limit Complaint Counsel’s 

subpoena is extended to March 20, 2023. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 10, 2023
#### Nathaniel WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40386.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 20, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 890.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### Paul GUTEN, Appellant, v. WEIS, VOISIN, CANNON, INC., Appellee.

No. 70-437.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Morris J. Friedman and Judith A. Brech-ner, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Goodman & Holtzman, Miami, for appel-lee. ;

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-defendant Guten appeals a final judgment rendered in a non-jury trial in favor of appellee-plaintiff Weis, Voisin, Cannon, Inc., a stock brokerage firm. The stock brokerage firm sued appellant for *442the difference in price between the amount paid for certain over-the-counter stock ordered by him and the amount received on its sale, some twenty-six days later, because appellant refused to accept and pay for the stock.

The primary thrust of appellant’s case deals with the correctness of the lower court’s finding's of fact and conclusions of law with regard to appellant’s purchase order and the sale of such stock by the ap-pellee.

We apply the well established rule of law that the trial court’s finding of fact and conclusions of law come to the appellate court with a presumption of correctness and will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. No reversible error having been demonstrated, we therefore affirm the judgment.

Affirmed.