alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORI-GINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE JI'EDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

FEB 0 7 2014 

.5C,<JS57 

SEcllmRY 

In the Matter of 

ECM BioFilms, Inc., 

a corporation, also d/b/a 

Enviroplastics International 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 9358 

PUBLIC DOCUMENT 

WITHDRAWAL OF JOINT MOTION 

In accordance with the Court's instructions, Complaint Counsel and Respondent ECM 

Biofilms ("ECM") hereby withdraw their Joint Motion To Reset the Fact Discovery Deadline. 

Dated: February 7, 2014 

Dated: February 7, 2014 

Respectfully submitted, 

Is/ Katherine Johnson 

Katherine Johnson (kjohnson3@ftc.gov) 

Jonathan Cohen (jcohen2@ftc.gov) 

Elisa Jillson (ejillson@ftc.gov) 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. M-8102B 

Washington, DC 20580 

Phone: 202-326-2185; -255 1; -3001 

Fax: 202-326-2551 

/s/ Jonathan W. Emord 

Jonathan W. Emord (jemord@emord.com) 

Peter A. Arhangelsky (parhangelsky@emord.com) 

Lou F. Caputo (lcaputo@emord.com) 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

11808 WolfRun Lane 

Clifton, VA 20124 

Phone: (202) 388-8899 

Fax: (202) 466-6938 

1 Executed with Mr. Emord's express authority. 

.I 
PUBLIC DOCUMENT 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 7, 2014, I caused a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing to be served as follows: 

One electronic copy to the Office of the Secretary, and one copy through the FTC's e-filing system: 

Donald S. Clark, Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room H-159 

Washington, DC 20580 

Email: secretarv@ftc.gov 

One electronic copy and one hard copy to the Office of the Administrative Law Judge: 

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room H-11 0 

Washington, DC 20580 

One electronic copy to Counsel for the Respondent: 

Jonathan W. Emord 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

11808 WolfRun Lane 

Clifton, VA 20124 

Email: jemord@emord.com 

Lou Caputo 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

3210 S. Gilbert Road, Suite 4 

Chandler, AZ 85286 

Email: lcaputo@emord.com 

Peter Arhangelsky 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

3210 S. Gilbert Road, Suite 4 

Chandler, AZ 85286 

Email: parhangelsky@emord.com 

I further certify that I possess a paper copy of the signed original of the foregoing 

document that is available for review by the parties and the adjudicator. 

Date: February 7, 2013 

2 

Is/ Katherine Johnson 

Katherine Johnson (kjohnson3@ftc.gov) 

Jonathan Cohen Qcohen2@ftc.gov) 

Elisa Jillson (ejillson@ftc.gov) 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. M-8102B 

Washington, DC 20580 

Phone: 202-326-2185; -2551; -3001 

Fax: 202-326-2551
• Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 903 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 2

Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 886-3 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

In re SANCTUARY BELIZE LITIGATION No: 18-cv-3309-PJM 

(I Bl ii ISJlJ'] ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN RECEIVER AND LEE 

NOBMANN 

The Motion for Order Approving Settlement Agreement and Release Between Receiver 

and_Lee Nobmann ("Motion") was brought by the Receiver, Robb Evans & Associates LLC 

("Receiver"). The Court, having read and considered the Motion together with the Declaration 

of Brick Kane ("Kane Declaration") and other documentary evidence filed in support of the 

Motion and papers filed in opposition to the Motion, if any, due and proper notice of the Motion 

having been given to the parties and other parties in interest, and good cause appearing therefore, 

it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 

l. The Motion shall be and is hereby granted in its entirety. 

2. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing: 

(a) The Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement Agreement"), a true 

and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit I to the Kane Declaration, is approved and 

authorized in its entirety; and 

-1-
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 903 Filed 04/17/20 Page 2 of 2

---------- -- ----- - 

Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 886-3 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 2 

(b) The Receiver is authorized to execute all other documents and instruments 

necessary or appropriate to complete, implement, effectuate and consummate the Settlement 

Agreement. 

16981090vl 

-2-

ABLE PETER J. MESSITTE 

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1968

JOSEPH N. BRIGGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THE POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; LISA, Manager, U.S.P.O., Cox Avenue, Asheville, NC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-05-257-1) Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph N. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Bradford Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In response to the magistrate judge’s report, Briggs filed a notice of appeal. That notice of appeal was interlocutory when filed; however, the district court’s subsequent entry of judgment prior to this court’s consideration of the appeal cures the defect in jurisdiction. See Equipment Fin. Group, Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers , 973 F.2d 345, 347 (4th Cir. 1992). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Joseph N. Briggs appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Briggs that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this wa rning, Briggs failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. * The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequence of failure to object. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see alsoThomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Briggs has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.- 3 - We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Raymond LYONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-497.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; E. Thom Rumberger, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00082-CV 

IN RE B.L. RELATOR

------------ 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

TRIAL COURT NO. 233-515485-12 

------------ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------ 

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and real 

party in interest’s response and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. 

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and MEIER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: April 18, 2016 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
#### Stephen Allan SAPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-307.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE Northern District of Illinois − CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 6,1

Eastern Division

Federal Trade Commission

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:15−cv−02047

Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr.

American Yellow Browser, Inc., et al.

Defendant.

NOTIFICATION OF DOCKET ENTRY

This docket entry was made by the Clerk on Friday, November 20, 2015:

 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle: Motion for Default

Judgment and Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Relief [35] is granted.

Motion hearing held on 11/20/2015. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice(ewf, )

ATTENTION: This notice is being sent pursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure or Rule 49(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. It was

generated by CM/ECF, the automated docketing system used to maintain the civil and

criminal dockets of this District. If a minute order or other document is enclosed, please

refer to it for additional information.

For scheduled events, motion practices, recent opinions and other information, visit our

web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.

Case: 1:15-cv-02047 Document #: 38 Filed: 11/20/15 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:593
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350








The undersigned, Stephen M. Hosmer, Co-President, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Royale Energy, Inc., a California corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certifies that:





(1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  September 2, 2010
By:
/s/ Stephen M. HosmerStephen M. Hosmer, Co-President, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West
Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and 2000, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the three- and six-month periods then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated January 23, 2001, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


/s/ S.R. Snodgrass A.C.



Wheeling, West Virginia
August 10, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,768,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,705,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,487,943
<PP&E>                                      58,440,968
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,266,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,583,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,669,365
<BONDS>                                     36,105,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,452,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,583,342
<SALES>                                      3,085,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,477,398
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,054,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               629,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             740,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                398,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            398,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   398,840
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2009 | Michael T. Vesey        |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    | Michael T. Vesey        |
|                    | President and           |
|                    | Chief Operating Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company (the "Company") for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barry A. Fromberg, Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                    /s/ Barry A. Fromberg
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Barry A. Fromberg
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    Date: November 14, 2002


Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the
      extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>


                                                                         EX-99.1
                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT



                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT
                         -------------------------------

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West
Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002 and 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the nine-month period then ended and the consolidated statements of
income for the nine and three-month period then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated January 25, 2002, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass A.C.



Wheeling, West Virginia
November 8, 2002
Case 9:23-cv-81045-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2023 Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION 

CASE NO. 23-81045-CIV-CANNON 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

FLUENT, LLC et al., 

Defendants.

__________________________________/ 

ORDER GRANTING RENEWED JOINT MOTION FOR 

ENTRY OF PROPOSED STIPULATED ORDER AND CLOSING CASE 

This cause comes before the Court on the parties’ Renewed Joint Motion for Entry of 

Proposed Stipulated Order [ECF No. 6], filed on August 10, 2023.

1 The parties advise the Court 

that they have reached a resolution of this case, subject to the Court’s entry of the parties’ Stipulated 

Order for Permanent Injunction, Monetary Judgment, Civil Penalty Judgment, and Other Relief 

[ECF No. 6-1]. Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction, Monetary 

Judgment, Civil Penalty Judgment, and Other Relief [ECF No. 6-1] it is hereby: 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 

1. The parties’ Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction, Monetary Judgment, Civil 

Penalty Judgment, and Other Relief [ECF No. 6-1] is approved as an Order of this Court. 

The parties are ordered to comply with the terms of the Stipulated Order [ECF No. 6-1]. 

1 The Court previously denied the parties’ Joint Motion without prejudice and instructed the parties 

to file a renewed Joint Motion that “specifies and justifies a reasonable tailored period of time for 

the Court to retain jurisdiction over this matter” [ECF No. 5]. As noted in the Renewed Joint 

Motion, “the parties have agreed to remove the ‘Retention of Jurisdiction’ provision from the 

Stipulated Order [ECF No. 6 p. 1]. 
 

 

 

 

_________________________________ 

AILEEN M. CANNON 

Case 9:23-cv-81045-AMC Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/11/2023 Page 2 of 2 

CASE NO. 23-81045-CIV-CANNON 

2. The Clerk shall CLOSE this case. Any scheduled hearings are CANCELED, any 

pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT, and all deadlines are TERMINATED. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 11th day of August 

2023. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: counsel of record 

2
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 47. 4 ( di st i ngui shi ng o pi ni ons a nd m em or andum opi ni ons)

, 52. 8( d) ( “ W hen 1

de ny i ng rel i ef, t he co urt m ay ha nd do w n a n o pi ni on bu t i s no t requ i red t o d o s o.” ). 

### NUM BER 13-09- 0035 9-CV



## COURT OF A PP EA LS

T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS

CORPUS CHRI ST I

- E DI NBURG

IN RE: 24R, INC. D/B/A THE B OOT JA CK

On Petit ion fo r Writ of M an da mus

.



## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON

B ef o re J u st ic es R o d rig u ez , G ar za a n d V el a

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam 1

Rel ator , 24R

, In c. d/b/ a The Boo t J ack , fil ed a peti ti on for w ri t of mandamus

re q u e st in g tha t t his C our t di re ct re spond ent, the H onor abl e Ar nol do C antu Jr

., pr esi din g

jud g e of Co unty

C our t at Law N o. 5 of Hi dal g o C ounty , Tex as, to v acat e hi s J une 2, 2009

or der deny ing r ela tor ’s m o ti o n to compel ar bit ra ti on i n tr ial co urt c ause number C L- 08-

1074- E. On J une 26, 2009, w e g ra nted re lat or ’s moti on for an emer g ency st ay of the t ri al

cour t pr oceed ing s a nd r eq uest ed a re spons e to the p eti ti on from t he r eal par ty in int er est

,

Fr ances S. Cab re ra

. Cab re ra fil ed a re spons e on September 14, 2009.

Hav ing ex amined and f u lly co n sid e re d rel a to r’s pe ti ti o n , Ca b re ra ’s re sp o n se ther eto,

a n d t h e o t h e r do c u m e n t s o n f il e

, t h is Co u rt is o f t h e o p in io n t h a t t h e re la t o r h a s n o t sh o wn2

itself entitle d to the relief sought and the pet ition should be den ied. Acco rdingly , relator’s

peti ti on for w ri t of mandamus i s DE NI ED

. Hav ing deni ed th e pet it ion , w e her eby LIF T the

em ergency stay of

p ro c e e d ings prev iously imp osed bythis Court in trial court cause

number C L- 08- 1074- E.

PER C UR IAM

Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv er ed and filed

on th e 22nd day

of September , 200 9.