alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7696 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7696

     To ensure that the Secretary of the Treasury provides for the 
  integration of Social Security Administration death records in the 
         databases used for verifying eligibility for payments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2020

 Mr. Curtis (for himself, Mr. Perry, Mr. Budd, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. King of 
Iowa, Mr. Steube, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Williams, Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Buck, 
 and Mrs. Lesko) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To ensure that the Secretary of the Treasury provides for the 
  integration of Social Security Administration death records in the 
         databases used for verifying eligibility for payments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Payments to the Deceased 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INTEGRATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION DEATH RECORDS IN 
              TREASURY DATABASES FOR VERIFYING ELIGIBILITY FOR 
              PAYMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary's 
designee (hereafter in this section referred to as the ``Secretary'') 
shall ensure that Social Security Administration death records are 
integrated into the relevant databases used by the Secretary for 
verifying eligibility for payments made under programs administered by 
the Secretary, including tax refunds.
    (b) Periodic Disclosure.--Notwithstanding section 205(r)(3) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(r)(3)) or any other provision of 
law, the Commissioner of Social Security shall periodically disclose 
(at such times and in such manner as the Administrator and Secretary 
shall jointly agree) Social Security Administration death records to 
the Secretary for the purpose of carrying out subsection (a).
    (c) Social Security Administration Death Records.--For purposes of 
this section, the term ``Social Security Administration death records'' 
means all information regarding all deceased individuals furnished to 
or maintained by the Commissioner of Social Security, including such 
records collected and maintained pursuant to section 205(r)(1) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 405(r)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40329

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERTO ESCAMILLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CR-175-1-RC-ESH

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alberto Escamilla appeals from his conviction of possessing

with intent to distribute crack cocaine and carrying a firearm

during a drug-trafficking offense. He contends solely that the

district court should have adjusted his offense level for

acceptance of responsibility.

The testimony of Investigator Tyree Beals, which was

corroborated by other evidence, provided support for the district

court’s determination that Escamilla was not entitled to an

adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. Because there was a

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 16, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 04-40329

-2-

foundation for the district court’s determination, we do not

disturb that determination. United States v. Washington, 340

F.3d 222, 227 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 942 (2003).

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00232-CV

IN RE ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

The court’s opinion in this mandamus action issued September 26, 2018. Thus, any 

motion for rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration was due October 11, 2018. On the 

due date, real party in interest, S.A. Villas, filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to 

file a motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration, asking for an additional 

twenty days in which to file such motions. After review, we granted the motion and ordered the 

real party in interest to file its motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration, if 

any, on or before October 31, 2018. Then on November 1, 2018, the real party in interest filed a 

second motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing and motion for en banc 

reconsideration, asking for an additional five days in which to file its motions. This time, the 

motion was opposed. The motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration were 

filed in this court on November 5, 2018. Accordingly, after review we GRANT the motion for 

extension of time and ORDER the motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration 

deemed filed. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. 

It is so ORDERED on this 7th day of November, 2018.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI22084, styled S.A. Villas, LP v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance 

Company, Crawford & Company, and Danny Brown, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, 

Texas, the Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker presiding.
#### Elizabeth TAYLOR et al. v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1467.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 3, 1973.

Joseph J. Gersten and Stephen L. Raskin, Miami, for appellants.

Stuart Simon, County Atty., and Alan T. Dimond, Asst. County Atty., for appellee.

Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW, M., Associate Judge.

*87PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record and briefs and heard oral argument of ■counsel. No reversible error having been made to appear, the final judgment is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
Subsidiaries of the Company
Exhibit 21.1

Atlanta Motor Speedway, Inc., a Georgia corporation
Bristol Motor Speedway, Inc., a Tennessee corporation
Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc. (CMS), a North Carolina corporation
Las Vegas Motor Speedway LLC, a Nevada limited liability corporation
SPR Acquisition Corporation d/b/a Sears Point Raceway, a California corporation
Texas Motor Speedway, Inc., a Texas corporation
Speedway Systems LLC d/b/a Finish Line Events, a North Carolina limited 
  liability corporation
600 Racing, Inc. (wholly owned subsidiary of CMS), a North Carolina corporation
INEX Corporation (wholly owned subsidiary of CMS), a North Carolina corporation
The Speedway Club, Inc. (wholly owned subsidiary of CMS), a North Carolina
  corporation
Oil-Chem Research Corporation, an Illinois corporation
Speedway Funding Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Sonoma Funding Corporation, a California corporation
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               |  |  |  |  |
| Ohio                                          |   | 000-24498 |   | 65-0190407 |
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation) |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |

|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |  |
| 325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio | 43215 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)               | (Zip Code) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

----

|                            |
|----------------------------|
|                            |  |  |  |  |
| Title of each class        |   | Trading Symbol(s) |   | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common Stock, no par value |   | DHIL |   | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |  |
| By Investment Vehicle  |
| Proprietary funds      | $ | 14,269 |  |
| Sub-advised funds      | 1,652 |  |
| Institutional accounts | 4,614 |  |
| Total                  | $ | 20,535 |  |

|                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |  |  |  |
| By Investment Strategy                              |
| Small Cap                                           | $ | 845 |  |
| Small-Mid Cap                                       | 2,915 |  |
| Mid Cap                                             | 356 |  |
| Large Cap                                           | 10,592 |  |
| All Cap Select                                      | 455 |  |
| Long-Short                                          | 3,733 |  |
| Global/International                                | 21 |  |
| Short Duration Fixed Income                         | 660 |  |
| Core Fixed Income                                   | 59 |  |
| Long Duration Fixed Income                          | 56 |  |
| Corporate Credit                                    | 931 |  |
| High Yield                                          | 90 |  |
|   (Less: Investments in affiliated funds) | (178 | ) |
| Total                                               | $ | 20,535 |  |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | June 4, 2019 | By: |   | /s/ Thomas E. Line |
|   |   |   |   | Thomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer |
#### Alfred R. BESADE et al., Appellants, v. Linda R. BESADE, Appellee.

No. 73-115.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 2, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00433

- CV
Gomez Paving, LLC d/b/a South Texas Paving v. South Texas Communications, Inc.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 10 of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CL

- 22

- 0214

- J

JUDGMENT THE THI RTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further pro ceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 3 , 2023
----

|     (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and, |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 9, 2011 | /s/ Robert S. Hekemian                            |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                          | Robert S. Hekemian                                |
|                          | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,884
<SECURITIES>                                    33,989
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,197
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,765
<PP&E>                                       2,400,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                 640,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,853,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,957
<BONDS>                                      1,017,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     513,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,853,466
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,907
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,192
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41




</TABLE>
#### Harry G. PROPHIT, Jr., et al. v. McSWEEN, BROOK AND BOLTON, et al.

No. 60351.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: McSween, Brooks & Bolton applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 347 So.2d 11.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the judgment is correct.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7631 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7631

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the permissible 
       use of funds timeframe under the Coronavirus Relief Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2020

  Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself, Ms. Dean, Ms. Wild, and Ms. Houlahan) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the permissible 
       use of funds timeframe under the Coronavirus Relief Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coronavirus Relief Fund Local 
Government Flexibility Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION.

    Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) 
is amended by striking ``December 30, 2020'' and inserting ``March 31, 
2021''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO


EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT to the EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT, which is dated March 10, 2014 (the “Amendment”), is made by and between ClearSign Combustion
Corporation (the “Company”) and Richard F. Rutkowski (the “Executive”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive
previously executed an Employment Agreement dated January 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”) for the Company to retain
the services of the Executive, and the Executive to render services to the Company, as its Chief Executive Officer; and


 


WHEREAS, the Agreement had a term
of three (3) years along with a provision to extend the term by an additional two (2) years.


 


THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and of the mutual promises contained in this Amendment, Company and Executive agree as follows:


 


Section 1 of the Agreement
is amended and restated as follows:


 


		1.	TERM.



 


Company hereby employs Executive as Company’s
Chief Executive Officer pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and Executive hereby accepts employment with Company pursuant to
the terms of this Agreement. This Agreement is effective on January 1, 2012, and will continue until January 1, 2017 unless terminated
earlier pursuant to Section 12 or 13 below. Company and Executive shall work together during the 12 month period prior to the last
year of each Renewal Period to determine whether this Agreement shall be renewed. If renewed, the term of such renewal will be
two years. In this Agreement the word “Term” shall, depending on the context used, refer to the initial three year
term or to any subsequent Renewal Period.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    	1



    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Agreement.


 


	 	Company:
	 	ClearSign Combustion Corporation
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ James N. Harmon
	 	 	James N. Harmon
	 	 	Chief Financial Officer


 


	 	Executive:
	 	 
	 	/s/ Richard F. Rutkowski
	 	Richard F. Rutkowski


 




    	2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 793 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 793

  To prohibit the use of funds for the official travel of Members of 
Congress during any period in which a Government shutdown is in effect.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2019

   Mr. Buck introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of funds for the official travel of Members of 
Congress during any period in which a Government shutdown is in effect.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING MEMBER OFFICIAL TRAVEL DURING SHUTDOWN.

    (a) Prohibition.--Except as provided in subsection (b), no 
appropriated funds, including official funds of the House of 
Representatives, official funds of the Senate, or funds available under 
any Federal law, rule, or regulation, may be used to pay for the costs 
of travel by a Member of Congress during any period in which a 
Government shutdown is in effect.
    (b) Exception for Travel by Member to Washington Metropolitan 
Area.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to travel by a Member 
of Congress to the Washington Metropolitan Area.
    (c) Determination of Government Shutdown.--For purposes of 
subsection (a), a Government shutdown shall be considered to be in 
effect if there is a lapse in appropriations for any Federal agency or 
department as a result of a failure to enact a regular appropriations 
bill or continuing resolution.
    (d) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``Member of Congress'' means a Senator or a 
        Representative in, or Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the 
        Congress; and
            (2) the term ``Washington Metropolitan Area'' means the 
        District of Columbia, the Counties of Montgomery and Prince 
        Georges in Maryland, and the Counties of Arlington, Fairfax, 
        Loudon, and Prince William and the Cities of Alexandria and 
        Falls Church in Virginia.
    (e) Sense of Congress Regarding Need of Members To Remain at Work 
During Government Shutdown.--It is the sense of Congress that, whenever 
a Government shutdown is in effect, Members of Congress should remain 
at work in Washington, DC until the shutdown is no longer in effect.
                                 <all>
```
#### CAL KOVENS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. E. E. COLLINS, d/b/a E. E. Collins Contracting Company, Appellee.

No. 70-699.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 24, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### A. J. RYAN, Jr., as Guardian of the person and property of Max C. Burton, an Incompetent, and Max C. Burton, Appellants, v. Anne BURTON, Appellee.

No. 70-98.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 15, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James F. Minnet, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 176 ) ll-K-(F)- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:54

AM Sheet 176 of 325P. 2 

# / A R II-K-(F)- 4
ENERG YSCENARI O FO

R INDUSTRIAL BOILER S NSP S ANALYSIS . Lette r fro

m T . Hogan , EEA

t o R . Newcombe , DOE . Augus t 23 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(F)- 4