alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CA DRONE SUPPLY

– ADDENDUM

August 27, 2015

U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,

Washington, DC 20590

Submitted Electronically via the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS)

Re: A d d e n d u m t o a d d A d d i t i o n a l U n m a n n e d A i r c r a f t t o E x e m p t i o n R e q u e s t

Dear Sir or Madam:

On Behalf of Revolutionary Unmanned Systems L LC dba

., California Drone Supply (CA Drone Supply), I

Jo h n Santry, Owner CA Drone Supply, w o u l d l i k e t o a d d a n a d d e n d u m t o m y request f o r exemption from

Part 21 Subpart H ; and Sections 91.203 (a) ( 1)

, 45.23 (b) , 91.7 (a), 91.9, 61.113, 61.133, 91.109, 91.119,

91.1 21, 91.151, and (91.401

- 91.417 ) Subpart E, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

This proposed a d d e n d u m would allow for the operation of a n a d d i t i o n a l unmanned aircraft (UA) the

F r e e f l y A l t a for the purpose of aerial image acquisition and videography

.

This exemption cites similarity with relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11445

, 11062, 11109, 11112, 11213, and 11138

The F r e e f l y A l t a i s a l s o a m u l t i r o t o r c r a f t s i m i l a r t o t h o s e a l r e a d y l i s t e d i n t h e e x e m p t i o n r e q u e s t

.

T h e owner’s manual for the Freefly Alta can be found here. User’s Manual

No other changes are being asked for in the original request.

I am the primary point of contact for this request and look fo r w a rd to w o r ki n g with y o ur o f f ic e

.

S inc e r e l y

,

Jo h n Santry

,

Owner

CA Drone Supply

1608 India St #505

San Diego, CA 92101

Phone: 804

- 852

- 7355

Email: john@revolutionaryus.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,710
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     91,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             798
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         62,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,226
<SALES>                                         25,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,386
<CGS>                                           21,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,943
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    443
<INCOME-TAX>                                       168
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000037008
<NAME> FIRST UNION REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND MORTGAGE INVESTMENTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      36,050,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,872,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,513,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,435,000
<PP&E>                                     584,517,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (105,632,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             597,823,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    306,456,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 31,737,000
<COMMON>                                    43,943,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 131,644,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               597,823,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           157,761,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              116,212,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,186,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          23,676,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,313,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                10,059,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
----

----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**Section      1350  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|   | 1. | The                Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended July                31,                2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or                78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | */s/*Debra A.                DiMaria                                           |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Debra                A. DiMaria                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | Chief                Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

----
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Captiva Software Corporation (formerly known as ActionPoint, Inc.) of our report dated February 4, 2002, except for Note 12, which is as of March 4, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in ActionPoint Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2001.  

 

 

 

 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPSan Jose, California

August 13, 2002
Metropolitan Area,Reports per 100K Population"Lincoln, NE Metropolitan Statistical Area",376"Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA Metropolitan Statistical Area",445"Sioux City, IA-NE-SD Metropolitan Statistical Area",284,"This chart identifies Metropolitan Areas (Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas) with a population of 100,000 or more.  Metropolitan areas are defined by Office of Management and Budget Bulletin No. 15-01, ""Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Delineations of These Areas"" (July 15, 2015).",
SNODGRASS

Certified Public Accountants and Consultants

EXHIBIT 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors

First West Virginia
Bancorp, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary as of
March 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity and the consolidated statement of cash
flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 4, 2010 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ S. R. Snodgrass, A.C.
|Wheeling, West Virginia  
|May 11, 2010             

S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

980 National Road Wheeling, WV 26003-6400 Phone: 304-233-5030 Facsimile: 304-233-3062
#### Gary Allen POWE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-434.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Arthur L. WOODWARD, Sr. v. Wallace BANGS.

No. 45767.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 27, 1970.

George M. Simmerman, Pascagoula, John Sekul, Biloxi, for appellant.

Bryant & Stennis, Gulfport, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice.

Arthur L. Woodward, Sr., as plaintiff, brought an action against Wallace Bangs in the Circuit Court of Harrison County, demanding damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in an automobile collision. Following a trial, the issues were submitted to a jury which returned a verdict for Bangs. Judgment was entered accordingly and Woodward appeals.

An examination of the testimony as it appears in the record reflects that the versions of Woodward and Bangs as to the circumstances and causes of the collision were in hopeless conflict and incapable of being reconciled. Woodward’s eyewitness account was opposed in all material particulars by that of Bangs and of the three other occupants of the Bangs automobile. Bangs’ version was also supported by testimony of two Mississippi Highway Safety Patrol Officers, who conducted the investigation following the collision, as to certain physical indicia found by them and *634which tended to support Bangs as to the location of his automobile off the highway when it had been struck by the Woodward car.

Woodward said, in effect, that Bangs had backed his car onto the highway, at night, without lights, into the path of the Woodward automobile, thus causing the collision. The substance of Bangs’ testimony was that he was off of the highway, on the shoulder, with all lights burning when the Woodward car left the highway and struck his automobile in the rear.

Woodward complains that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence and that he was entitled to a directed verdict upon the issue of liability. However, it is clear from the record that the evidence preponderated the other way and fully justified the jury’s verdict for Bangs.

Also assigned as error requiring reversal is the action of the trial court in declining to give two jury instructions requested by appellant. These instructions must be considered in the light of the factual issues made by the evidence. So considered, neither should have been given, and the trial court’s action with respect to them was correct.

Accepting, as we must, the version of the facts in evidence most favorable to the appellee, it appears that the issues were submitted to the jury under proper instructions and that the jury’s verdict was supported by the evidence.

We have considered other matters assigned as error and find them to be without merit.

No reversible error is reflected by the record and the judgment appealed from must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

GILLESPIE, P. J., and RODGERS, BRADY and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27622]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; SEP for Medications Development.
    Date: June 27, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Garden Inn Bethesda, 7301 Waverly Street, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Ivan K. Navarro, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, Division of 
Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 4242, MSC 9550, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-827-5833, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#026b74636c2c6c63746370706d426c6b6a2c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d2bba4b3bcfcbcb3a4b3a0a0bd92bcbbbafcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Development of Medications to Prevent and Treat 
Opioid Use Disorders and Overdose (UG3/UH3 (Clinical Trials 
Optional).
    Date: August 16, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Ivan K. Navarro, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Policy and Review, Division of 
Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 4242, MSC 9550, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
301-827-5833, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4cdd2c5ca8acac5d2c5d6d6cbe4cacdcc8ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ed849b8c83c3838c9b8c9f9f82ad838485c38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 7, 2018.
Natasha M. Copeland,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-12674 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

_____________________

No. 1 6

- 2444

JWAINUS PERRY

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

,

v.

LUIS S. SPENCER, Commissioner; THOMAS DICKAUT, Former Superintendent; ANTHONY

MENDOSA, Former Deputy of Classification; JAMES SABA, Superintendent; ABBE

NELLIGAN, Deputy of Classification; PATRICK TOOLIN, Correctional Program Officer;

KRISTIE LADOUCER; CAROL MICI; THOMAS NEVILLE

,

Defendants

- Appellees

,

JENS SWANSON, Property Officer

,

Defendant

.

__________________

Before

Howard, Chief Judge

, Lynch, Thompson, Kayatta , Barron and Gelp í

,

Circuit Judges

,

__________________

ORDER OF COURT

Entered: January 3, 2022

A majority of the active judges who are not disq ualified have voted to hear this case en

banc. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing en banc is granted. In accordance with customary

practice, the panel opinion released on August 29, 2018 is withdrawn, and the judgment entered

the same date is vacate d. See 1st Cir. I.O.P. X(D).

The en banc court will have copies of the parties' previously filed briefs. The parties are

also directed to file simultaneous supplemental briefs on or before February 3, 2022. Such briefs

should not exceed 30 pages, and shall otherwise comply with applicable rules concerning format,

service and other requirements.Amici are welcome to file amicus briefs, also not to exceed 30 pages per brief, no later than

7 days after the principal supplemental briefs are filed, but must seek prior leave of court.

An y reply supplemental briefs must be filed by the parties no later than 21 days after the

amici briefing deadline. Reply briefs are limited to 15 pages.

The en banc court will conduct oral argument remotely in this case on Friday, April 8,

2022, at 10:0 0 a.m.

By the Court:

Mar ia R. Hamilton , Clerk

cc:

Jwainus Perry

Alexis Garmey Chardon

Daniel Greenfield

Sheryl Grant

Jenipher R. Jones

Ilya Shapiro

Matthew R Segal

John Joseph Butts

Josefina B. Garcia
Presidential Documents

26345 

Federal Register 

Vol. 83, No. 109 

Wednesday, June 6, 2018 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2018–08 of May 14, 2018 

Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) 

and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2012 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the 

Treasury[, and] the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, after carefully considering the reports submitted 

to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration, including the 

report submitted in April 2018, and other relevant factors such as global 

economic conditions, increased oil production by certain countries, the global 

level of spare petroleum production capacity, and the availability of strategic 

reserves, I determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112–81, and 

consistent with prior determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of 

petroleum and petroleum products from countries other than Iran to permit 

a significant reduction in the volume of petroleum and petroleum products 

purchased from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions. 

I will continue to monitor this situation closely. 

The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, May 14, 2018 

[FR Doc. 2018–12332 

Filed 6–5–18; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PRES DOCSTrump.EPS</GPH>
UNITED STATES ENVIRO~TAL PROTECTION AGENCY
 

REGION 8
 

1595 Wynkoop Street
 

DENVER, CO .80202-1129
 

Phone 800-227-8917
 

http://www.epa.gov/region08
 

JAN 12 2011 

Ref: 8P-AR 

Mr. Terry L. O'Clair, P.E. 

Director, Division of Air Quality 

Environmental Health Section 

Gold Seal Center 

918 E. Divide Avenue 

Bismarck,ND 58501-1947 

Dear Mr. O'Clair: 

Thank you for submitting the North Dakota Ambient Monitoring Network Plan 20 I0 

(AMNP) dated July 2010. Initial submission was posted for public comment to NO's website on 

June 9, 2010. A second public comment period ran from October 27 to November 27.2010 after 

minor corrections were made and comments were replied to. Final submission was received on 

December 2,2010. Region 8 has reviewed the submitted AMNP and found that the 

requirements specified in 40 CFR Part 58.10. as well as the 105 grant commitment to conduct a 

review annually, have been met with the final submission of this document. 

Region 8 appreciates the DivIsion of Air Quality's (DAQ) effort to provide and consider 

public comments during the Network Monitoring Planning process. Thank you for your 

openness and attempts to make the process more transparent. 

If you have any questions on this issue. please contact me at (303) 312-6434 or Michael 

Copeland of my staff at (303) 312-6010. 

Callie A. Videtich, Director 

Air Program 

cc: Justin Mayer, DAQ