alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States of America 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Division of Advertising Practices

July 9, 2020 

Via Electronic Mail (lbrett@bbbnp.org) 

Laura Brett, Esq. 

Vice President 

National Advertising Division 

112 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

Re: Advertising by Charter Communications, Inc. for 5G Mobile Service 

Dear Ms. Brett: 

We have reviewed NAD’s referral of Charter Communications, Inc., d/b/a Spectrum 

Mobile (“Charter”), regarding advertising claims for its mobile service. The referral arose out of 

an NAD Challenge that AT&T Services, Inc. (“AT&T”) filed through NAD’s Fast-Track SWIFT 

process in which it took issue with Charter’s alleged unqualified “5G” mobile service claims. 

Charter objected to proceeding via the SWIFT process for these claims, and NAD denied 

Charter’s request to proceed via NAD’s standard track process. Charter subsequently declined to 

participate in the SWIFT process, and NAD referred this matter to us for review. 

We have communicated with Charter’s counsel and have confirmed that it has 

discontinued the advertising at issue. Accordingly, staff has determined not to take additional 

action at this time. 

The staff’s decision to forego a formal investigation at this time is not to be construed as 

a determination that a violation may not have occurred, just as the pendency of an investigation 

should not be construed as a determination that a violation has occurred. The Commission 

reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. The FTC 

appreciates your referral and the opportunity to continue to assist in supporting NAD. 

Very Truly Yours, 

Carolyn L. Hann 

Chief of Staff for Advertising Practices 

cc: Thomas P. Jirgal and David G. Mallen, Esq., Loeb & Loeb LLP 

s/ Carolyn L. Hann
Attachment 5

Mileage Adjustment Instructions

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 2843-5 Filed 01/31/17 Page 1 of 2
Attachment 5:  Mileage Adjustment Instructions

The following instructions apply to Model Year 2009‐2015 vehicles.  Model Year 2016 vehicles are not

subject to a mileage adjustment.   

   

Step 1.  Calculate the Pre‐Tax Mileage Adjustment  

A. Count the number of months since September 2015 (for example, if it is

March 2017, use 18 months). A.  _______ Months

B. Multiply the number of months in Box 1(A) by 1,250 miles.  Enter the

total in Box 1(B). B.  _______ Miles

C. Locate the vehicle’s current mileage.  Subtract the number of miles in

Box 1(B) from the vehicle’s current mileage.  This is the vehicle’s

Adjusted Mileage.

C.  _______ Miles

D. Locate the Mileage Adjustment Table for the vehicle.  

 Attachment 5A: Q5

 Attachment 5B: A6, A7, Q7, and Touareg

 Attachment 5C: A8, A8L, and Cayenne   

Find the row that corresponds to the Adjusted Mileage from Box 1(C),

and the column for the model year of the vehicle.  Enter the dollar mount

in Box 1(D).  This is the Pre‐Tax Mileage Adjustment.    D.  $_________

Step 2.  Calculate the Tax‐Adjusted Mileage Adjustment

A. In the State and Local Tax Table (Attachment 6), find the Combined

Rate/Formula rate for the state where the vehicle was registered in

September 2015.   

Note: If the state where the vehicle was registered in September 2015 is

unknown or the vehicle was registered in a territory not listed, use 6%.

A.  _________%

B. Multiply the Pre‐Tax Mileage Adjustment from Box 1(D) by the tax rate

from Box 2(A).   

B.  $_________

C. Add the amount from Box 2(B) to the Pre‐Tax Mileage Adjustment from

Box 1(D).  This is the total mileage adjustment.

TOTAL MILEAGE ADJUSTMENT C.  $_________

The Total Mileage Adjustment will be added or subtracted to the buyback or approved emissions

modification amount for the vehicle.   

Note: if the Mileage‐Adjusted Approved Emissions Modification amount for an Eligible Vehicle is less

than $7,500, the difference between $7,500 and the Mileage‐Adjusted Approved Emissions Modification

amount will be added to the Buyback or AEM amount for the vehicle.  The $7,500 amount reflects

payments from both VW and Bosch, and assume that consumers elect both payments.  

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 2843-5 Filed 01/31/17 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00364-CR

Joe William MEURET Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-CRD-07

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 20, 2016.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 27, 2009 

s0518 

Order 

 

May 27, 2009 

138155 

WAAD F. SEBA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138155 

 COA: 278911 

Oakland CC: 2006-073839-CK 

LAWYER’S TITLE INSURANCE 

CORPORATION, TRI-COUNTY TITLE 

AGENCY, INC., 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

LEO GILHOOL, 

Defendant, 

and 

DATATRACE INFO SERVICES COMPANY, 

INC., 

Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 18, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 14, 2011 | /s/ Donald W. Barney                             |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Donald W. Barney                                 |
|                            | President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                            |                                             |
---

**EXHIBIT 99.16**

CONSENT OF AUTHOR





Derek Rance, P.Eng. Behre Dolbear and Company Ltd. 67
Yonge Street Toronto ON M5E 1J8

US Securities and Exchange Commission

I, Derek Rance, P.Eng., certify that I have read the written
disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are
any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report or
that the written disclosure in the Form 40F of Great Basin Gold Ltd. contains
any misrepresentation of the information contained in Technical Report on the
Optimisation of the Feasibility Study of the Burnstone Project, Mpulamalanga
Province, Republic of South Africa dated June 21, 2007.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory
authorities.

Dated this 31stday of March 2008.



|signed and
      sealed
|-----------------------
|Derek Rance, P.Eng.    

---
---

|               |              
|-------------- | -------------
|March 28, 2011 | Exhibit 99.11

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the
      Company)
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 
|    | Consent of Expert                          

This letter is provided in connection with the Companys Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010, and any amendments
thereto, (the Annual Report) to be filed by the Company with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report
incorporates by reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2010.

On my own behalf and on behalf of Deswik Mining Consultants
(Pty) Ltd (Deswik), I hereby consent to the use of my name and Deswiks
name in connection with reference to my and Deswiks involvement in the
preparation of the following technical report (the Technical
Report):

- Technical Report Update on the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve
  Estimates for the Burnstone Gold Mine dated February 8, 2011

and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof,
in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

I also consent to the use of my name and Deswiks name in
connection with reference to my and Deswiks involvement in the preparation of
the Technical Report and to references to the Technical Report, or portions
thereof, and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the information
derived from the Technical Report in the Companys Form F-10 Registration
Statement, as amended, filed with the SEC under File No. 333-163021.

Yours truly,

Deswik Mining Consultants (Pty) Ltd

/s/ F.J. de
BruinFrederik J. de Bruin., Pr.Sci.Nat.

---
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rohit Chopra

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson

DOCKET NO. 9386

SECOND ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

IN LIGHT OF PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

By order dated March 19, 2020, the Commission has already stayed this proceeding and 

deferred the commencement of the evidentiary hearing by 30 days. Because of the declared 

public health emergency1 associated with the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 

(“COVID-19”), also known as SARS-CoV-2; and because it has been advised that gatherings of 

ten or more persons may facilitate the spread of the disease, the Commission has determined that 

it is in the public interest to mitigate the transmission and impact of COVID-19, and that good 

cause exists to stay this proceeding for an additional 45 days and to again reschedule the 

evidentiary hearing. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this proceeding be fully stayed, except for matters of 

settlement, for an additional 45 calendar days; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the evidentiary hearing date and all pre-hearing 

deadlines in this proceeding be further extended by the number of calendar days of this 

additional stay. The Administrative Law Judge retains discretion to adjust any such pre-hearing 

deadlines to the extent compatible with the hearing date as extended by this Order or to make a 

recommendation to the Commission regarding an alternative hearing date.

1 Pursuant to the Public Health Services Act, 42 U.S.C. 247d, on January 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Department 

of Health and Human Services issued a declaration that a health emergency exists because of COVID-19; and on 

March 13, 2020, the President of the United States issued a proclamation that a national emergency exists concerning 

COVID-19. Remarks by President Trump, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarkspresident-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-conference-3/ (Mar. 13, 2020).

In the Matter of

NTT GLOBAL DATA CENTERS

AMERICAS, INC., as successor in

interest to RagingWire Data Centers, 

Inc.,

a corporation.
By the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Acting Secretary

SEAL:

ISSUED:

2

April 13, 2020
#### Howard W. TURREL and Mellicent Turrel, Appellants, v. HOWARD E. TURRELL, a/k/a Howard E. Turrell, and the Oxford Finance Companies, a Pennsylvania corporation, Appellees.

No. 70-858.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7647 

To provide for a COVID–19-related delay regarding annual limitation on 

cost-sharing for group health plans and individual and small group health 

insurance coverage. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2020 

Mr. MCEACHIN (for himself, Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois, and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 

on Education and Labor, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a COVID–19-related delay regarding annual 

limitation on cost-sharing for group health plans and 

individual and small group health insurance coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7647 IH

1 SECTION 1. COVID–19-RELATED DELAY REGARDING AN2 NUAL LIMITATION ON COST-SHARING FOR 

3 GROUP HEALTH PLANS AND INDIVIDUAL AND 

4 SMALL GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE COV5 ERAGE. 

6 For a plan or policy year that begins on or after Jan7 uary 1, 2020, and prior to the first calendar year that 

8 begins on or after the date that is twelve months after 

9 the end of the public health emergency first declared by 

10 the Secretary of Health and Human Services on January 

11 27, 2020, with respect to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus— 

12 (1) section 156.130(h) of title 45, Code of Fed13 eral Regulations, as published in the Federal Reg14 ister on May 14, 2020, shall not apply; and 

15 (2) with respect to a group health plan or an 

16 issuer of individual or small group health insurance 

17 coverage (as such terms are defined in section 2791 

18 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg– 

19 91)), the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of 

20 Labor, and the Secretary of Health and Human 

21 Services shall enforce section 156.130(h) of title 45, 

22 Code of Federal Regulations, as published in the 

23 Federal Register on April 25, 2019, and in effect on 

24 October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
| Area Code/County              | Count |
|-------------------------------|-------|
| 205  Alabama                  | 18827 |
| 251  Alabama                  | 6673  |
| 256  Alabama                  | 14753 |
| 334  Alabama                  | 11042 |
| 938  Alabama                  | 5     |
| Autauga Alabama               | 433   |
| Baldwin Alabama               | 3664  |
| Barbour Alabama               | 161   |
| Bibb Alabama                  | 201   |
| Blount Alabama                | 608   |
| Bullock Alabama               | 8     |
| Butler Alabama                | 79    |
| Calhoun Alabama               | 1781  |
| Chambers Alabama              | 164   |
| Cherokee Alabama              | 507   |
| Chilton Alabama               | 303   |
| Choctaw Alabama               | 228   |
| Clarke Alabama                | 112   |
| Clay Alabama                  | 74    |
| Cleburne Alabama              | 90    |
| Coffee Alabama                | 462   |
| Colbert Alabama               | 355   |
| Conecuh Alabama               | 16    |
| Coosa Alabama                 | 40    |
| Covington Alabama             | 271   |
| Crenshaw Alabama              | 116   |
| Cullman Alabama               | 879   |
| Dale Alabama                  | 506   |
| Dallas Alabama                | 120   |
| Dekalb Alabama                | 418   |
| Elmore Alabama                | 1145  |
| Escambia Alabama              | 277   |
| Etowah Alabama                | 1055  |
| Fayette Alabama               | 199   |
| Franklin Alabama              | 878   |
| Geneva Alabama                | 189   |
| Greene Alabama                | 10    |
| Hale Alabama                  | 48    |
| Henry Alabama                 | 150   |
| Houston Alabama               | 1308  |
| Jackson Alabama               | 442   |
| Jefferson Alabama             | 7912  |
| Lamar Alabama                 | 175   |
| Lauderdale Alabama            | 881   |
| Lawrence Alabama              | 154   |
| Lee Alabama                   | 1807  |
| Limestone Alabama             | 1465  |
| Lowndes Alabama               | 77    |
| Macon Alabama                 | 75    |
| Madison Alabama               | 6943  |
| Marengo Alabama               | 594   |
| Marion Alabama                | 992   |
| Marshall Alabama              | 1185  |
| Mobile Alabama                | 3552  |
| Monroe Alabama                | 71    |
| Montgomery Alabama            | 1918  |
| Morgan Alabama                | 1273  |
| No Zip Code Reported, Alabama | 204   |
| Perry Alabama                 | 13    |
| Pickens Alabama               | 75    |
| Pike Alabama                  | 177   |
| Randolph Alabama              | 85    |
| Russell Alabama               | 558   |
| Shelby Alabama                | 4505  |
| St. Clair Alabama             | 960   |
| Sumter Alabama                | 20    |
| Talladega Alabama             | 485   |
| Tallapoosa Alabama            | 466   |
| Tuscaloosa Alabama            | 1930  |
| Walker Alabama                | 615   |
| Washington Alabama            | 68    |
| Wilcox Alabama                | 21    |
| Winston Alabama               | 150   |
FILED 

 U.S.COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 10/27/99 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

*Honorable Richard Mills, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by

designation.

PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

--------------------

No. 98-5651

--------------------

D.C. Docket No. 97-505-CV-DMM

KAREN C. HERZOG, an individual,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CASTLE ROCK ENTERTAINMENT, a California 

partnership, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida

------------------------------------------------------------

(October 27, 1999)

Before BIRCH and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and MILLS*

, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM: 

Based on the well-reasoned district court opinion, we AFFIRM. A copy of the

opinion is annexed hereto.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THERMO ECOTEK CORPORATION'S
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                 20,002
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          57,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                             7,292
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      210,301
<PP&E>                                                251,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                         63,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        442,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  92,613
<BONDS>                                                58,444
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                3,787
<OTHER-SE>                                            187,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          442,814
<SALES>                                               178,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      178,338
<CGS>                                                 133,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         133,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      112,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      7,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (89,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (32,673)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (56,957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         (2,463)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (59,420)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (1.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (1.65)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Financial Officer of Forlink
Software Corporation, Inc., that, to his knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report of the company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the company's financial condition and
results of operations.

April 27, 2006


/s/ Hongkeung Lam
--------------------------------------
Hongkeung Lam, Chief Financial Officer