alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 November 5, 2007

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of October 31, 2007, preliminary assets under management totaled
$4.457 billion.  Following is a summary as of October 31, 2007 (in millions):

				         Equity    Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts 	        $   899	      $  128       $ 1,027
Mutual Funds (including sub-advised)      2,766	         171         2,937
Private Investment Funds	   	    493            0           493
                                        -------       ------       -------
Total			       	        $ 4,158       $  299       $ 4,457

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small and Small-Mid Cap         $    660
Large Cap and Select		   1,072
Long-Short		           2,428
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     297
				--------
Total			           4,457


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: Novemebr 5, 2007	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE MONTH ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         321,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,958,215
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,361,728)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,876,161
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,649,180
<PP&E>                                      68,968,342
<DEPRECIATION>                            (24,836,013)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,575,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,178,792
<BONDS>                                     19,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,845,199
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,051,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,575,231
<SALES>                                      9,968,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,140,360
<CGS>                                        5,247,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,089,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               320,213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             413,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                389,466
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,118
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,135
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
#### Thomas F. BRADLEY, Appellant, v. Sandra BRADLEY, Appellee.

No. N-309.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 22, 1970.

Virginia Searcy Barr, Fort Walton Beach, and Smith, Tolton & Wolff, Valparaiso, for appellant.

Estergren, Fleet, Fortune & Anchors, Fort Walton Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-husband by this appeal from a judgment in a divorce action challenges the trial court’s order granting custody of the parties’ four minor children to the wife upon the grounds that the wife has been guilty of gross misconduct to such an extent that she was not a fit and proper person to be awarded custody of the children, and custody by her is detrimental to the welfare and best interests of the children. The husband was granted the divorce upon his counterclaim alleging adultery and extreme cruelty.

This record reflects a pattern of conduct on the part of the wife that is contrary to the basic moral standards of any community. This pattern of conduct is especially disturbing in view of the fact that the wife is a highly trained social worker. Apparently she is capable of rendering advice to our unfortunate underprivileged citizens but is incapable of disciplining herself to conform to basic standards of decency. The trial judge was confronted with the tremendous responsibility of deciding which of the two parents should have primary custody of the four minor children, none of which had reached their teens. He found that the welfare and best interests of these children at the present time would be best served by *499granting custody to the wife with liberal visitation rights to the father. We observe that the trial judge specifically reserved jurisdiction of the custody arrangement for a period of six months for the stated purpose : “ * * * to review the living conditions of said minor children.” In view of the trial judge’s decision to again examine the conditions within six months from date of the final judgment as to the best interests and welfare of these children, this Court will decline to upset the trial judge’s discretion at this time.

Appellee-wife has petitioned for attorney’s fees for defending this appeal. It is observed that no attorney’s fees were awarded to the wife by the trial judge. Need on the part of the wife with the commensurate showing of ability to pay on the husband’s part has not been shown; therefore, the petition for attorney’s fees is denied.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 11  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
For the Periods Ended June 30
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)



                                     Second Quarter            Six Months
                                   1997      1996 (a)        1997      1996 (a)

Net income......................$  47,613   $  39,770     $  92,886   $  77,898

Preferred dividends.............       --          --            --           5

Income available to common
  shareholders..................$  47,613   $  39,770     $  92,886   $  77,893




Weighted average of primary 
 common shares..................   86,067      88,845        86,429      89,127

Weighted average of preferred
  stock convertible to common
  shares........................       --          33            --          39

Weighted average of fully
 diluted common shares..........   86,067      88,878        86,429      89,166


Primary earnings per share
  (income available to common
  shareholders divided by 
  weighted average of common 
  shares).......................$    0.55   $    0.45     $    1.07   $    0.87


Fully diluted earnings per
  share (net income divided by 
  weighted average of fully 
  diluted common shares)........$    0.55   $    0.45     $    1.07   $    0.87



Note:  The effect of stock options outstanding are not dilutive to earnings per
       share as defined in APB 15 and therefore are not included with the above
       calculations.

(a)  Per share amounts and weighted average shares have been restated to reflect
     a 3-for-1 stock split in December 1996.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Terry D. Wall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: December 13, 2005               |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Terry D. Wall                      |   |   |        |
| Terry D. Wall*Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0556

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

PITASKUMMAPI DAVID GREEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and 

Appellant has until September 26, 2024, to file the reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2024

08/26/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0556
EX-10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 

ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE 

This Assignment of Agreement of Purchase and Sale (the “Assignment”) is made and entered into as of December 9, 2013, by
and between RREEF AMERICA L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignor”) and RPT WALLINGFORD PLAZA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), with reference to the
following facts: 
 Assignor, as Purchaser, and WP Partners LLC, a Washington limited liability company, as Seller (“Seller”),
have entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated as of November 20, 2013 (as the same has been amended from time to time, the “Purchase Agreement”), for the purposes of Assignor
acquiring from Seller certain real property located at 4468 Stoneway North, in Seattle, King County, Washington, as more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement. Assignor now desires to assign to Assignee all of its rights and obligations
under the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. As of the date hereof, Assignor
hereby assigns, conveys, transfers and delivers to Assignee all of the Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Purchase Agreement. 

2. Assignee hereby agrees to expressly assume, perform, and be subject to all the terms, covenants, conditions and obligations imposed upon
Assignor under the Purchase Agreement. 
 3. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, Assignor has not been released from, and shall
remain fully liable to Seller for, all pre-closing obligations pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement. Assignee’s assumption of Assignor’s obligations under the Purchase Agreement shall entitle Assignee to the benefit of and the
right to enforce Seller’s covenants, representations and warranties under the Purchase Agreement as if Assignee was the original Purchaser (as defined in the Purchase Agreement) thereunder. Assignor and Assignee both hereby represent and
warrant to Seller that Assignee is a Permitted Assignee as defined in Section 15 of the Purchase Agreement. 
 4. This Assignment shall
inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the legal representatives, heirs, and permitted successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the day and year first above written. 

 

			
	ASSIGNOR
	
	 RREEF AMERICA L.L.C.,
 a Delaware
limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Andrew Harper

	Name:	 	Andrew Harper
	Title:	 	Director


  

			
	ASSIGNEE
	
	 RPT WALLINGFORD PLAZA, LLC,
 a
Delaware limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Julianna S. Ingersoll

	Name:	 	Julianna S. Ingersoll
	Title:	 	Vice President
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,244-02

EX PARTE ALVIN DEJUAN MELTON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR25,897-B IN THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MILAM COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. He

filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Applicant seeks a late appeal.

After the jury convicted Applicant, trial counsel signed and filed a notice of appeal for

Applicant, so trial counsel became Applicant’s appellate counsel. Melton v. State, No. 03-19-00396-

CR (Tex. App.—Austin del. Sep. 19, 2019); Jones v. State, 98 S.W.3d 700, 703 (Tex. Crim. App.

2003). The appellate court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution because Applicant failed to

pay or arrange to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. Id. Counsel concedes that the

clerk’s record was not prepared for the appeal due to his error.
2

Relief is granted. Jones v. State, supra Applicant may file an out-of-time appeal of his

conviction in cause number CR25,897 from the 20th District Court of Milam County. Within ten

days from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is

indigent. If Applicant isindigent and wantsto be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint

counsel to represent him on direct appeal. Applicant must file a written notice of appeal in the trial

court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: July 28, 2021

Do not publish
U.S.Departmentof Transportation Office of theSecretary ofTransportation

Mr. Clayton Gamber CEO, Twin Air Calypso 700 SW 341h Street Suite 100 FortLauderdale, FL 3 3315 Assistant Secretary 

### NOV 06 2012 1 ,, "''q

.........! .· - .......!

Re: Cancellation ofOn-demand AirTaxi Registrationunder 14 CFRPart 298
DearMr. Gamber: 

### ,- ·': I ;

This letter serves as notice that the Department has canceled Twin Air Calypso Limited, Inc.'s ("Twin Air Calypso"), 14 CFR Part 298 on-demand air taxi registration. Pursuant to 14 CPR 298.24(d) of our rules, the registration of an Air Taxi Operator may be canceled by the Department ifthe operator's Air Carrier Certificate is revoked by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). On August 7, 2012, the FAA revoked Twin Air Calypso's operating certificate on an emergencybasis. Accordingly, bythis letter Twin Air Calypso's Part 298 on-demand airtaxi registration is hereby canceled and it no longer possesses economic authority from the Department to directly engage in air transportation. Therefore, all future obligations involving such activities must be canceled and the proper parties should be notified oftheir cancelation immediately. Twin Air Calypso should provide appropriate refunds to consumers in a timely manner for those canceled services.
We are also concerned about Twin Air Calypso's failure to comply with the Department's Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings' settlement agreement regarding the company's unauthorized operations of scheduled passenger service in violation of49 U.S.C. §§ 41101, 41712, and 41738, and 14 CFR Part 298, which was outlined in Orders 2012-2-20 and 2005-3-38. This matter raises questions regarding whether it is in the public interest to permit Twin Air Calypso to operate pursuant to the exemption authority ofPart 298 or otherwise, and we intend to consider these issues if Twin Air Calypso orits currentprincipals seek air carrier authority inthe future.
Sincerely,

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairscc: Mr. RyanM. Landers Federal AviationAdministration Southern Region PO Box 20636 Atlanta, GA 30320
Mr. Michael Moulis, Esq MoulisAviationLaw, PA Suite 344 1100 Lee WagenerBoulevard Ft. Lauderdale, FL 3 3315 2
=============================================================
                          UNITED STATES
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                            FORM 8-K


                         CURRENT REPORT
             Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                Securities Exchange Act of 1934



                       September 30, 2002
        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                     Temtex Industries, Inc.
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



           Delaware               0-5940         75-1321869
 (State or other jurisdiction  (Commission      (IRS Employer
      of incorporation)        File Number)  Identification No.)



         1190 W. Oleander Avenue
           Perris, California                    92571
(Address of principal executive offices)       (Zip Code)



                          909-657-7311
       Registrant's telephone number, including area code



                       One Lincoln Centre
                  5400 LBJ Freeway, Suite 1375
                       Dallas, Texas 75240
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)


=============================================================

<PAGE>



Item 5.   OTHER EVENTS AND REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

     On September 30, 2002, the Registrant relocated its
principal executive offices from Dallas, Texas to Perris,
California.  The relocation of its corporate headquarters is part
of the Registrant's broader and ongoing strategic plan to
streamline operations and increase efficiencies. Instead of
renewing the lease for the Dallas office space, the Registrant
instead chose to utilize existing space at its current
manufacturing facility  located at 1190 W. Oleander Avenue,
Perris, California 92571.  The Registrant holds a long-term lease
for the Perris facility expiring on September 30, 2008.  The
monthly rental rate for this facility is approximately $6,300.



                            SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



Date: October 10, 2002        TEMTEX INDUSTRIES, INC.



                               By: /s/ JOHN F. GURROLA
                                   ------------------------------
                                     John F. Gurrola
                                     (Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Modavox Inc (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 29, 2008 as files with the Securities
and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David J. Ide,
Chief Executive and the principal financial officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 10 U.S.C ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contain in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

BY: /S/ David J. Ide
    ----------------
    DAVID J. IDE
    CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
    JUNE 13, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Modavox, Inc. and will
be retained by Modavox, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Source Corporation (1st Source) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Murphy III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 1st Source.
 
 
 
 
 By:
 
 
 /s/CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY III
 Christopher J. Murphy III
 Chief Executive Officer
 October 21, 2010
#### Russell Leroy ILER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43238.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 26, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 76.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.