alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORIGINAL
 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMSSION
 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

) Docket No. 9327 

Polypore International, Inc. ) PUBLIC 

a corporation. ) 

) 

REVISED ERRATA SHEET 

This Revised Errata Sheet to Complaint Counsel's Post-Trial Brief corrects the page and 

line number references in the brief. 

Page No. Line	 Corrections 

75 21	 changefrom "(Paragraph ILF.4)". to "(Paragraph ILF.3)". 

77 5	 change from "Paragraph VI" to "Paragraph VIII" 

77 8	 change from "alternative suppliers. Theseprovisions..." 

to "alternative suppliers (Paragraph VII). These provisions..." 

77 15	 change from "Paragraph VII" to "Paragraph VI" 

78 7	 change from "Paragraph VII" to "Paragraph IX" 

Dated: July 16, 2009	 Respectfully Submitted 

Steven A. Dahm 

J. Robert Robertson 

Complaint Counsel 

Federal Trade Commission 

Bureau of Competition 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Nw 

Washington, DC 20580 

Telephone: (202) 326-2192 

Telephone: (202) 326-2008 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on July 16, 2009, I filed via hand delivery an original and two copies 

of the foregoing Revised Errata Sheet with: 

Donald S. Clark, Secretary 

Office of the Secretar 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Rm. H-135 

Washington, DC 20580 

I hereby certify that on July 16, 2009, I served via electronic and interoffice mail two 

copies of the foregoing Revised Errata Sheet with: 

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, H-106 

Washington, DC 20580 

oalj (gftqwv 

I hereby certify that on July 16, 2009, I served via electronic mail delivery and express 

mail two copies of the foregoing Revised Errata Sheet with: 

Wiliam L. Rikard, Jr., Esq. 

Eric D. Welsh, Esq. 

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP 

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000 

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 

wil iamrikard (g parkerpoe.com 

ericwelsh (g parkerpoe. com 

Linda Cunning am 

Federal Trade SlOn 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20580 

Telephone: (202) 326-2638 

lcunningham (g ftc. gov
<TABLE>
                                   Exhibit 11

                          FARR COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)

As a result of the 3 for 2 stock split distributed on March 28, 1997, per share
amounts for 1996 have been restated to reflect the weighted average number of
shares of common stock outstanding, increased by shares issued for the stock
split. The per share amounts in 1996 are calculated as though the stock split
occurred on the first day of the year.

<CAPTION>
                                              Three Months Ended                Nine Months Ended
                                         Sep. 27, 1997  Sep. 28, 1996     Sep. 27, 1997  Sep. 28, 1996
                                         -------------  -------------     -------------  -------------

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION:

<S>                                         <C>            <C>               <C>            <C>       
Earnings:
Net Income                                  $1,892,000     $1,595,000        $5,418,000     $4,272,000
                                            ==========     ==========        ==========     ==========

Shares:
Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding                5,498,179      5,441,760         5,498,179      5,441,760
                                            ==========     ==========        ==========     ==========

Net Income Per Common Share                      $0.35          $0.29             $0.99          $0.78
                                            ==========     ==========        ==========     ==========




PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION:

Earnings:
Net Income                                  $1,892,000     $1,595,000        $5,418,000     $4,272,000
                                            ==========     ==========        ==========     ==========

Shares
Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding                5,498,179      5,441,760         5,498,179      5,441,760

Assuming exercise of options
    reduced by the number of
    shares which could have been
    purchased with the proceeds
    from exercise of such options              139,336         96,069           139,336         96,069
                                            ----------     ----------        ----------     ----------

Weighted average number of
    common shares and dilutive
    common share equivalents
    outstanding                              5,637,515      5,537,829         5,637,515      5,537,829
                                            ==========    ===========        ==========     ==========

Net Income Per Common Share                      $0.34           $0.29            $0.96          $0.77
                                            ==========     ===========       ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FARREL CORPORATION AS OF JUNE 29, 1997 AND FOR THE THREE
AND SIX MONTH PERIODS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                           8,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                       339
<INVENTORY>                                     16,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,100
<PP&E>                                          17,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,381
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,690
<SALES>                                         42,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,306
<CGS>                                           33,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,089
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (125)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,185
<INCOME-TAX>                                       421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12210]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, July 26, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Thursday, July 26, 2018, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. For more information please 
contact Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or (214) 413-6523, or write TAP 
Office, 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments 
to the website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: June 1, 2018.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-12210 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,442-01

EX PARTE MARTIN HERNANDEZ GARCIA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR45195A IN THE 385 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM MIDLAND COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of possession of a prohibited substance or item in a correctional

facility and sentenced to 3 years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas

corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that he was denied adequate notice from the Board of Pardons and

Paroles that he would be considered for release on discretionary mandatory supervision. See TEX.

GOV’T CODE §§ 508.147, 508.149. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to

relief. Ex parte Retzlaff, 135 S.W.3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Accordingly, the record should

be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC.
2

art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Board of Pardons and Paroles’s Office of the

General Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledge of relevant facts. In developing

the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects

to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and

wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the

hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court

shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was provided adequate notice from the Board of Pardons and Paroles that he would be considered

for release on discretionarymandatory supervision. The trial court maymake any other findings and

conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: September 16, 2020

Do not publish
Flowchart of the EEO Complaint Process

After the investigation is completed, you will receive 

a copy of the investigation report. The Director of 

EEO will notify you of the right to either request a 

hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) 

or receive a final FTC decision without a hearing.

If mediation is successful within 90 days, the 

Director of EEO will inform the EEO 

counselor that the claim was resolved.

The Director of EEO will 

issue a final FTC decision 

within 60 days of receiving 

notice of the request for a 

final FTC decision.

You may request an 

EEOC hearing within 30 

days of receiving the 

report of investigation.

An EEOC AJ will make 

a decision about the 

matter.

If you are not satisfied with 

the FTC’s final decision, you 

may appeal to EEOC within 

30 days of receipt. 

Within 40 days of 

receiving the AJ’s 

decision, the FTC must 

issue a final order.

If you are not satisfied with 

EEOC’s appellate decision, 

you may file a request for 

reconsideration or you may 

file in Federal district court 

within 90 days of receipt.

If you are not satisfied 

with the FTC’s final 

order, you may appeal 

to EEOC within 30 days

of receipt.

Formal Complaint Process

Incident Occurrence

Pre-complaint Counseling

You must contact an EEO counselor within 

45 days of the incident. If you request 

traditional counseling, the EEO counselor will 

have 30 days to attempt resolution.

You may request to participate in the FTC’s 

Alternative Dispute Resolution Program (i.e., 

Mediation Program), in which case the FTC 

will have up to 90 days to resolve the matter. 

If you choose mediation, pre-complaint 

counseling will not occur. If mediation is not 

successful and a resolution is not reached 

within 90 days, the EEO counselor will issue a 

notice of the right to file a formal complaint. 

You will have 15 days to file a formal 

complaint.

EEOC regulations require that you

seek pre-complaint counseling 

before filing a formal complaint.

You must file a formal complaint within 15 days of 

receiving the notice of the right to file a formal 

complaint. The Director of EEO will acknowledge 

receiving the formal complaint and notify you of 

the claims accepted for investigation. If the claims 

asserted and those accepted for investigation differ, 

the Director of EEO will explain the reasons for 

such differences, including whether the agency is 

dismissing the entire complaint, or in part.

The Director of EEO will assign an investigator to 

develop impartial and appropriate factual 

information on the claims accepted for processing. 

The FTC must complete the investigation, within 

180 days of the date the formal complaint was 

filed.

The 30-day counseling period may be 

extended no more than 60 days if you and the 

FTC agree to such an extension in writing. If 

you choose traditional counseling and a 

successful resolution is not reached, the EEO 

counselor will issue a notice of the right to 

file a formal complaint. You will have 15 

days to file a formal complaint.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Sharlon Denise Williams, * From the 50th District

Court of Baylor County,

Trial Court No. 5498

.

Vs. No. 11

- 15

- 00117

- CR * June 25, 2015

The State of Texas

, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
NUVA-EX10.11-2013-10K


Exhibit 10.11


AMENDMENT NO. 4
TO
2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
OF NUVASIVE, INC.


WHEREAS, effective as of January 25, 2014 the Board of Directors of NuVasive, Inc. agreed to amend the 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as previously amended (the “2004 ESPP”), pursuant to Section 26 of the 2004 ESPP.


NOW THEREFORE, the 2004 ESPP shall be amended as of January 25, 2014 as follows:


		
	1.
	The last sentence of Section 22 of the 2004 ESPP is amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“This Plan shall continue until the earlier to occur of (a) termination of this Plan by the Board (which termination may be effected by the Board at any time), (b) issuance of all of the shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under this Plan, or (c) December 31, 2018.” 


		
	2.
	Except as amended by this Amendment No. 4, the 2004 ESPP shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




		
	3.
	Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment No. 4, terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the 2004 ESPP.
Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Certain 

Imported Textile, Wool, and Fur Products 

The Textile Fiber Products Identification Act ("Textile Act"), Wool Products Labeling 

Act ("Wool Act"), and the Fur Products Labeling Act ("Fur Act") (collectively, the "Acts") 

provide that a retailer can avoid liability for mislabeling or false advertising if the retailer obtains 

a continuing or separate guaranty from a third party certifying that products it transfers are not 

misbranded, falsely invoiced, or falsely advertised. Under the Acts, the guaranty protections are 

available only ifthe retailer receives the guaranty in "good faith" and from a "person residing in 

the United States." Wool Act, 15 U.S.C. § 68g(a); Fur Act, 15 U.S.C. § 69h(a); Textile Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 70h(a). Thus, a retailer cannot obtain a guaranty for directly imported textile, wool, 

and fur products. 

Based on its enforcement experience, the Commission finds it in the public interest to 

provide protections for retailers repeating marketing claims about directly imported products 

when they rely in good faith on information provided solely by the products' manufacturers. 

The Commission, therefore, will not initiate an enforcement action against a retailer for 

violating Section 68a of the Wool Act, Section 69a of the Fur Act, Section 70a ofthe Textile 

Act, any Rule implementing those Sections, or any Commission or court order compelling 

compliance with those Sections or Rules, in connection with the marketing or sale of a product, 

where the retailer (1) cannot legally obtain a continuing or separate guaranty under the 

applicable Act; (2) does not embellish or misrepresent claims provided by the manufacturer 

related to the applicable Act or Rules; and (3) does not market the product as a private label 

product. Provided, however, that this policy shall not apply if the retailer knew or should have 

known that the marketing or sale ofthe product would violate the applicable Act, Rules, or 

order. 

The policy announced here balances the importance of treating fairly retailers who 

directly import goods with the Commission's responsibility to enforce the Acts and Rules. It 

provides greater consistency for retailers regardless of whether they directly import products or 

use third-party domestic importers. The policy, however, is narrowly tailored to ensure that the 

Commission retains authority to enforce the Acts and Rules to protect consumers. Thus, the 

policy does not cover retailers that embellish or misrepresent claims a manufacturer provides or 

those retailers that make their own claims, such as by marketing products as their own. 

Moreover, it excludes retailers that knew or should have known that the marketing or sale o(a 

good violates the applicable Act. In such instances, the retailer is not reasonablyrelyin!fon 

representations of third-party suppliers.'
No. 10668.

#### Goddard *v.*McGrew et al.

Decided June 9, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Mr. W. J. Davidson*and *Mr. Otis LI. Fisk,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Harry Hess,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
1/42/43/44/4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rohit Chopra

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter

Christine S. Wilson

In the Matter of

Peabody Energy Corporation, 

a public company; 

Docket No. 9391 

and 

Arch Coal, Inc., 

a public company.

COMMISSION ORDER ON PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE EVIDENTIARY HEARING IN 

LIGHT OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

Because of the declared public health emergency1 associated with the outbreak of the 

coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), also known as SARS-CoV-2, and because it has 

been advised that gatherings of people in close proximity may facilitate the spread of the 

disease, the Commission has determined that it is in the public interest to mitigate the 

transmission and impact of COVID-19, and that good cause exists to issue an order 

addressing public access to the evidentiary hearing in this proceeding pursuant to Commission 

Rule 3.41(a), 16 C.F.R. § 3.41(a). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

(1) public access to the evidentiary hearing in this proceeding, to the extent 

permitted by any in camera orders, shall be allowed only via telephone 

conference or live streaming;

 

(2) all hearings in this proceeding before the Chief Administrative Law Judge that 

involve the testimony of witnesses will take place in Room 532 of the Federal 

 

1 Pursuant to the Public Health Services Act, 42 U.S.C. § 247d, on January 31, 2020, the Secretary of the 

Department of Health and Human Services issued a declaration that a health emergency exists because of COVID19; and on March 13, 2020, the President of the United States issued a proclamation that a national emergency

exists concerning COVID-19. Remarks by President Trump, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefingsstatements/remarks- president-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-conference-3/ 

(Mar. 13, 2020).
Trade Commission Headquarters Building; and 

(3) no more than ten people will be allowed in Room 532 during the taking of

witness testimony, limited to:

i. the Chief Administrative Law Judge and his two Attorney Advisors;

ii. the testifying witness;

iii. Complaint Counsel (no more than two people);

iv. Respondent’s counsel (no more than two people);

v. the witness’ counsel (no more than one person); and

vi. a court reporter.

By the Commission, Commissioner Slaughter not participating.

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

SEAL:

ISSUED: July 1, 2020