Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 878
[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1900]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
 ACTION: Final order.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying the microneedling device for aesthetic use into class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for the microneedling device for aesthetic use's classification. We are taking this action because we have determined that classifying the device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.
 DATES: This order is effective June 8, 2018. The classification was applicable on March 1, 2018.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Ferlin, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. G449, Silver Spring, MD, 20993-0002, 240-402-1834, 
                        *Kimberly.Ferlin@fda.hhs.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  I. Background Upon request, FDA has classified the microneedling device for aesthetic use as class II (special controls), which we 
                    ( print page 26576)
                    have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class III assignment. The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as “postamendments devices” because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act). FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new device is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807). FDA may also classify a device through “De Novo” classification, a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may utilize either procedure for De Novo classification. Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section 513(f)(2). Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k) and then a request for classification, if the person determines that there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA shall classify the device by written order within 120 days. The classification will be according to the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the initial classification of the device. We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request or premarket approval application in order to market a substantially equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining “substantial equivalence”). Instead, sponsors can use the less burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device. II. De Novo Classification On July 5, 2016, Bellus Medical, LLC, submitted a request for De Novo classification of the SkinPen Precision System. FDA reviewed the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls. FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device. Therefore, on March 1, 2018, FDA issued an order to the requester classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 878.4430. We have named the generic type of device microneedling device for aesthetic use, and it is identified as a device using one or more needles to mechanically puncture and injure skin tissue for aesthetic use. This classification does not include devices intended for transdermal delivery of topical products such as cosmetics, drugs, or biologics. FDA has identified the following risks to health associated specifically with this type of device and the measures required to mitigate these risks in table 1. Table 1—Microneedling Device for Aesthetic Use Risks and Mitigation Measures
Identified risks
Mitigation measuresAdverse tissue reaction
Biocompatibility evaluation and Labeling.Cross-contamination and infection
Sterilization validation, Reprocessing validation, Non-clinical performance testing, Shelf life testing, and Labeling.Electrical shock or electromagnetic interference with other devices
Electromagnetic compatibility testing, Electrical safety testing, and Labeling.Damage to underlying tissue including nerves and blood vessels, scarring, and hyper/hypopigmentation due to:
                             • Exceeding safe penetration depth 
                             • Mechanical failure 
                             • Software malfunction
Non-clinical performance testing, Technological characteristics, Shelf life testing, Labeling, and Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis.
 FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III, it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final 
                    ( print page 26577)
                    order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification requirements under section 510(k) of the FD&C Act. III. Analysis of Environmental Impact The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required. IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 This final order establishes special controls that refer to previously approved collections of information found in other FDA regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in the guidance document “De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)” have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814, subparts A through E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0231; the collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120; and the collections of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0485. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 878 Medical devices
 Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 878 is amended as follows: PART 878—GENERAL AND PLASTIC SURGERY DEVICES
 1.The authority citation for part 878 continues to read as follows: Authority:
                        21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371. 2.Add § 878.4430 to subpart E to read as follows: § 878.4430
  (a) 
                            *Identification.*
                             A microneedling device for aesthetic use is a device using one or more needles to mechanically puncture and injure skin tissue for aesthetic use. This classification does not include devices intended for transdermal delivery of topical products such as cosmetics, drugs, or biologics. (b) 
                            *Classification.*
                             Class II (special controls). The special controls for this device are: (1) The technical specifications and needle characteristics must be identified, including needle length, geometry, maximum penetration depth, and puncture rate. (2) Non-clinical performance data must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested: (i) Accuracy of needle penetration depth and puncture rate; (ii) Safety features built into the device to protect against cross-contamination, including fluid ingress protection; and (iii) Identification of the maximum safe needle penetration depth for the device for the labeled indications for use. (3) Performance data must demonstrate the sterility of the patient-contacting components of the device. (4) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating continued sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the intended shelf life. (5) Performance data must demonstrate the electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) of all electrical components of the device. (6) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be performed for all software components of the device. (7) The patient-contacting components of the device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible. (8) Performance data must validate the cleaning and disinfection instructions for reusable components of the device. (9) Labeling must include the following: (i) Information on how to operate the device and its components and the typical course of treatment; (ii) A summary of the device technical parameters, including needle length, needle geometry, maximum penetration depth, and puncture rate; (iii) Validated methods and instructions for reprocessing of any reusable components; (iv) Disposal instructions; and (v) A shelf life. (10) Patient labeling must be provided and must include: (i) Information on how the device operates and the typical course of treatment; (ii) The probable risks and benefits associated with use of the device; and (iii) Postoperative care instructions.
 Dated: June 4, 2018. Leslie Kux, Associate Commissioner for Policy.


[FR Doc. 2018-12335 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164-01-P