alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7901
NORMAN JAMES HAYES, Petitioner - Appellant, versusWARDEN KIRKLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Flo rence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-3825-2BE) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: May 2, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Norman James Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on September 19, 1996; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on December 2, 1996, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:17-cv-00467-JDL Document 1-4 Filed 11/30/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 76 
 

EXHIBIT D 
os &o-oav Trial oner 

Betarol Risk Free - No Strings Anachedl 

YESI I would like to take advantage of your 60-day 

FREE TRIAL offer to see for myself the regenerating, 

rejuvenating and stimulating effects that Betarol wi ll 

have on relieving symptoms of an enlarged prostate. 

Your guarantee to me: 

.I THE 60-DAY FREE TRIAL, during which I can see the 

benefits that Betarol will have on my prostate and on 

my health. 

.!THE GUARANTEE that I am getting the original, 100% 

natural, PREMIUM Pharmaceutical Grade product and 

that I take no risk because the ingredients in Betarol 

are clinically proven to naturally shrink my prostate 

without contra-indication or side effects. 

.!THE TOTAL SATISFACTION GUARANTEE. If I am not 

completely satisfied, you reimburse me in full, less 

S&H, no questions asked (once I return my treatment 

- even if the bottles are empty). 

g 

p 

p

g

- Having to urinate urgently with no warning. 

• Inability to achieve orgasm. • Painful or Incomplete urination. 

· Tired during the day from broken up sleep. 

Betarols Powerful Blend of Doctor Formulated, 

Pharmaceutical Grade Botanical Extracts are the 

best heating herbs money can buy to treat Enlarged 

Prostate, Reduce BPH, Relieve Urinary Symptoms, 

and Boost Your Energy and Sex Drive! 

Order a 3 or 6 month 

supply of Betarol WITHIN 

THE NEXT 10 DAYS by 

telephone or mail and 

you'll get 

A FREE BOTTLE of 

HGWSO! 

Super Potent HGWSO 

Horny Goat Weed conta ins the 

highest concentration of the erection producing active ingredient that 

Money Can Buy. This special offer 

makes Betarol an even greater deal! 

Try Both •. . Order Today!
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the availability of the inventions listed below, assigned to the United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, for domestic and foreign licensing by the Department of the Navy.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patent applications cited should be directed to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div., Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div., Code OOL, Bldg. 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, Email                         *Christopher.Monsey@navy.mil,*                         812-854-2777.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following patent application is available for licensing: Patent Application No. 14/953,315 (Navy Case No. 200226): Optimized Subsonic Projectiles and Related Methods.

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: June 5, 2018.

E.K. Baldini,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-12522 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7653 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7653

 To require the Department of Transportation to study the effects of a 
 high-speed rail project in Florida on motorist and pedestrian safety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2020

  Mr. Posey (for himself and Mr. Mast) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Department of Transportation to study the effects of a 
 high-speed rail project in Florida on motorist and pedestrian safety.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pedestrian Safety Study Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. STUDY ON EFFECTS OF HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECT ON MOTORIST AND 
              PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that more than two dozen fatalities 
have taken place since the Virgin Trains project began in Florida in 
July 2017.
    (b) Study.--The Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration 
and the Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration shall 
jointly conduct a study on the effects of the high-speed rail project 
carried out in Florida by Virgin Trains USA, or any successor operator, 
on motorist and pedestrian safety, including the safety of individuals 
attending schools that are within 1 mile of such rail project.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Administrators described in subsection (b) shall submit 
to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 
and the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate, and 
the department of transportation of the State of Florida a report 
containing--
            (1) the results of the study required under subsection (b); 
        and
            (2) recommendations on how to improve motorist and 
        pedestrian safety in the vicinity of the high-speed rail 
        project studied under subsection (b), including the 
        construction of barriers and other safety improvements.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-30655, 333-74747, 333-74715, 333-78521, 333-78567, 333-83725, 333-35806,333-62502, 333-84010, 333-90986, 333-91002, 333-117334 and 333-137396 on FormS-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32221, 333-60277, 333-70335, 333-85269,333-92361, 333-32526, 333-40698, 333-47914, 333-67978, 333-73274, 333-81170,and 333-84932 on Form S-3 of our report dated June 6, 2006 (January 19, 2007 asto the effects of the matters discussed in Note 21 and the effects of therestatement discussed in Note 2 and May 30, 2007 as to Note 4 and the interimbalance sheet data presented in Note 20) related to the financial statements ofTHQ Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to therestatement of the consolidated financial statements as discussed in Note 2),and of our report dated June 6, 2006 (January 19, 2007 as to the effect of thematerial weakness described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controlover Financial Reporting (restated)) on the internal control over financialreporting (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness ofthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting because of the materialweakness), appearing in this Annual Report, Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A ofTHQ Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2006.

DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California

May 30, 2007

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7760 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7760

   To make a supplemental appropriation for the COVID-19 Telehealth 
 Program of the Federal Communications Commission for the fiscal year 
                       ending September 30, 2020.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2020

    Ms. Spanberger (for herself, Mr. Johnson of South Dakota, Mrs. 
  Napolitano, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Welch, and Mr. Cox of 
 California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To make a supplemental appropriation for the COVID-19 Telehealth 
 Program of the Federal Communications Commission for the fiscal year 
                       ending September 30, 2020.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR COVID-19 TELEHEALTH PROGRAM.

    (a) Appropriation.--There is appropriated, out of any money in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2020, for an additional amount for ``Federal 
Communications Commission--Salaries and Expenses'', $200,000,000, to 
remain available until expended, to carry out the COVID-19 Telehealth 
Program established in the Report and Order in the matter of COVID-19 
Telehealth Program that was adopted by the Federal Communications 
Commission on March 31, 2020 (FCC 20-44).
    (b) Emergency Designation.--The amount appropriated by subsection 
(a) is designated by the Congress as being for an emergency requirement 
pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 and shall be available only if 
the President subsequently so designates such amount and transmits such 
designation to the Congress.
                                 <all>
```
Filed 4/1/15 P. v. Suero CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication o r ordered published for purposes of rule 8.111.5.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

KYLE CHRISTIAN SUERO,
Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B255383 (Super. Ct. No . 2013030157) (Ventura County)

Kyle Christian Suero appeals from the j udgment entered after a jury convicted
him of assault with force likel y to produce great bodily inju ry (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4)) 1 with special findings that he inflicted gr eat bodily injury on the victim (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). Appellant admitted suffering a prio r serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)) and a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, su bd. (c)(1) & (e)(1); 11 70.12, subd. (a)(1) & (c)(1), and was sentenced to 14 y ears state prison. The trial court ordered appellant to pay a $300 restitution fine (§ 1202. 4, subd. (b)), a $300 parole revocation fine (§ 1202.45), a $1,503.22 restitution claim, vict im restitution (§ 1202.4, subd . (f)), a $40 court security fee (§ 1465.8), and a $30 criminal convicti on assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373). We appointed counsel to represent appe llant in this appeal. After counsel’s examination of the record, she filed an opening brief in whic h no issues were raised.

1 Unless otherwise stated, all statutor y references are to the Penal Code.2 On January 20, 2015, we advised appella nt that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consid er. No response has
been received. The record reflects that appellant punched and kicked Alexander Birgel outside a Newbury Park bar after Birgel was knocked out by another person. Birgel was hospitalized for multiple lacerations and contus ions, soft tissue hematoma, abrasions to the head and face, a deep oral lacera tion, and a deviated septum.
We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that a ppellant's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no ar guable issues exist. ( People v.
Wende (1979) 25 Cal. 3d 436, 443; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 126.) The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

YEGAN, J.

We concur:

GILBERT, P.J.

PERREN, J.3 James P. Cloninger, Judge
Superior Court County of Ventura

________________ ______________

Shea S. Murphy, under ap pointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance fo r Respondent.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

CASE NAME 

Ardagh Group S.A., et al. 

FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

009356 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in 

proceeding the appearance of 

D counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) 

D counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1:81 counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding, 

Gordon Lang 

glang@nixonpeabody.com 

Nixon Peabody LLP 

401 9th Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Phone Number: 202-585-8319 

Fax Number: 866-947-3542 

Matthew Mcl aughlin 

mmclaughlin@nixonpebody.com 

Nixon Peabody LLP 

1 00 Summer Street 

Boston, MA 02110 

Phone Number: 617-345-6154 

Fax Number: 866-440-6480 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 

(Gordon Lang) 

2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being fi led. 

Non-Party Non-Party 

The Boston Beer Company, Inc. 

One Design Center 

Suite 850 

Boston, MA 02210 

Phone Number: 617-368-5000 

5. DATE SIGNED 

12/9/2013 

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580
# Missouri Court of Appeals

Southern District

JULY 6, 2016

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b).

1. Case No. SD33983

Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs. REGINALD OLIPHANT, Defendant-Appellant.

2. Case No. SD33664

Re: STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent,

vs. JEFFREY A. WOLFSON, Defendant-Appellant.
**EXHIBIT23.1**

**Consent of KPMG LLP**

The Board of Directors

Sauer-Danfoss Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements No. 33-53927 and No. 333-93745 onForm S-8 of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. of our reports dated March 14,2005 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Sauer-Danfoss Inc.and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annualreport on Form 10-K of Sauer-Danfoss Inc.

As described innote 12 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2003 the Companychanged its method of accounting for stock compensation expense. As describedin note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in 2002 the Companychanged its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangibles.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Des Moines, Iowa

March 14, 2005

----
#### Beverly Jane WINN, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF NURSING, Respondent.

No. R-367.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari denied.
#### WINSTON TOWERS 100 et al., Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1426.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1974.

Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman, Miami, for appellants.

Stuart Simon, Co. Atty., and Alan T. Dimond, Asst. Co. Atty., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from an order of the circuit court denying a petition to intervene is affirmed on the basis of the opinion of this court in Metropolitan Dade County v. Centex Homes Corporation, Fla.App.1974, 291 So.2d 231, decided this date.
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION


I, Jonathan P. Rosen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The First Republic
Corporation of America;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2003                        /s/ Jonathan P. Rosen
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Jonathan P. Rosen
                                               Chief Executive Officer