alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
261 La. 224

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph SOLOMON (Solmom), Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52265.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: Joseph Solomon (Solmom), Jr., applying for remedial writ and writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
#### DAMSON OIL CORPORATION et al. v. Larry A. SARVER et al.

No. 60346.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: La. Irrigation and Mill Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the *897Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 346 So.2d 1304.

Writ refused. The result is correct.

CALOGERO, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6753

DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH LOFTON; RALPH S. BRITT; WILLIAM

JENNETTE; S. D. STEWART; SERGEANT WOOTEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-95-707-5-H)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se. William Dennis Worley,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order affirming the

magistrate judge's order denying Appellant's motion for discovery.

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is

not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).

The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable

interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Pedro GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-696.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 21, 1971.

Pedro Garcia, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent-defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Ashley Capital Management, Inc. as General Partner of Atlas Futures Fund, LP,
certify that (i) the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Atlas
Futures Fund, LP fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Atlas Futures Fund, LP.

ATLAS FUTURES FUND, LP

By:  Ashley Capital Management, Inc., General Partner


By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
    Michael Pacult
    Chief Executive Officer &
    Chief Financial Officer



Date:  March 30, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S QUARTERLY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         754,176
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         251,335
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               129,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,978,354
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         109,201
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           104,146
<LOANS>                                     13,385,312
<ALLOWANCE>                                    169,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,837,051
<DEPOSITS>                                  13,511,541
<SHORT-TERM>                                   650,986
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            689,210
<LONG-TERM>                                  1,081,664
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,093
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,775,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              17,837,051
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                547,034
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               69,135
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 9,477
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               625,646
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             209,811
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             259,645
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          366,001
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   29,180
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (31)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                267,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                178,046
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     103,413
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.21
<LOANS-NON>                                     74,021
<LOANS-PAST>                                    16,618
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                20,600
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               161,418
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   27,331
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,073
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              169,340
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            99,710
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                835
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         68,795


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
No. 00-1084.

No. 00-7713.

No. 00-7732.

No. 00-7884.

No. 00-7886.

No. 00-7961.

No. 00-8027.

No. 00-8061.

No. 00-8090.

No. 00-8116.

No. 00-8173.

No. 00-8175.

No. 00-8198.

No. 00-8295.

No. 00-8342.

No. 00-8350.

#### In re Coughlin; In re Brown; In re Brown; In re Tarvin; In re Bradley; In re Atkins; In re Cummings; In re Rivera; In re Daniels; In re Kubweza; In re Davis; In re Wells; In re Fuller; In re Stern; In re McGirt; and In re Washington.

Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),      and, |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June      9, 2010 | /s/ Donald W.      Barney                             |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Donald      W. Barney                                 |
|                               | President,      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                               |                                                  |
#### Eifs, Inc., Respondent, v Morie Company, Inc., Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 802]

—In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for breach of contract and breach of warranty, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), dated March 29, 2000, which granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to serve and file an amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely given,” absent prejudice or surprise resulting directly from the delay (CPLR 3025 [b]; *see, McCaskey, Davies & Assocs. v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*59 NY2d 755). Here, the defendant failed to demonstrate that the amended complaint would result in prejudice or surprise. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs motion *(see, Murray v City of New York,*43 NY2d 400, 405).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Bracken, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
ConsumerState,CountyorAreaCode,Complaints
Alabama,205,7708
Alabama,251,4450
Alabama,256,6704
Alabama,334,4176
Alabama,938,12
Alabama,Autauga,414
Alabama,Baldwin,3379
Alabama,Barbour,119
Alabama,Bibb,73
Alabama,Blount,311
Alabama,Bullock,3
Alabama,Butler,60
Alabama,Calhoun,1428
Alabama,Chambers,116
Alabama,Cherokee,239
Alabama,Chilton,232
Alabama,Choctaw,17
Alabama,Clarke,76
Alabama,Clay,28
Alabama,Cleburne,124
Alabama,Coffee,517
Alabama,Colbert,451
Alabama,Conecuh,12
Alabama,Coosa,38
Alabama,Covington,187
Alabama,Crenshaw,45
Alabama,Cullman,538
Alabama,Dale,305
Alabama,Dallas,68
Alabama,DeKalb,338
Alabama,Elmore,1092
Alabama,Escambia,99
Alabama,Etowah,819
Alabama,Fayette,143
Alabama,Franklin,1212
Alabama,Geneva,123
Alabama,Greene,23
Alabama,Hale,28
Alabama,Henry,210
Alabama,Houston,841
Alabama,Jackson,393
Alabama,Jefferson,6426
Alabama,Lamar,104
Alabama,Lauderdale,652
Alabama,Lawrence,150
Alabama,Lee,807
Alabama,Limestone,582
Alabama,Lowndes,30
Alabama,Macon,100
Alabama,Madison,5724
Alabama,Marengo,91
Alabama,Marion,1370
Alabama,Marshall,604
Alabama,Mobile,3087
Alabama,Monroe,32
Alabama,Montgomery,1694
Alabama,Morgan,847
Alabama,No Zip Code Reported,271
Alabama,Perry,27
Alabama,Pickens,58
Alabama,Pike,93
Alabama,Randolph,94
Alabama,Russell,276
Alabama,Shelby,3119
Alabama,St. Clair,866
Alabama,Sumter,21
Alabama,Talladega,603
Alabama,Tallapoosa,310
Alabama,Tuscaloosa,1519
Alabama,Walker,637
Alabama,Washington,35
Alabama,Wilcox,11
Alabama,Winston,168
Office of the Secretary

November 29, 2021

[Company name and address]

Dear [company name]:

Enclosed is an Order to File Special Report (“Order”), issued by the Federal Trade 

Commission pursuant to Section 6 of the FTC Act. The Order seeks information regarding 

supply chain disruptions affecting your company’s business in consumer goods, including food. 

Please review the Order, including all definitions and instructions, carefully and consider 

the availability of the requested data and information. 

Submissions responsive to this Order that are marked “confidential” will not be disclosed 

without first giving you ten days’ notice of the Commission’s intention to do so, except as 

provided in Sections 6(f) and 21 of the FTC Act. Confidential or privileged commercial or 

financial information will be reported only on an aggregate or anonymous basis, consistent with 

Sections 6(f) and 21(d) of the FTC Act. 

In addition to the above requested information, we would be happy to consider any 

additional information you consider relevant to this inquiry. If you have any questions about the 

issuance of this Order or your filing of a Special Report to the FTC, please contact Kenneth 

Merber at kmerber@ftc.gov or (202) 326-3551. 

Regards,

April J. Tabor

Secretary

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580
Extension of Memorandum ofUnderstanding between the FTC and the CFPB 

This MOU has been extended for 45 days while the agencies finalize its renewal. 

Director 

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau 

Chairwoman 

Federal Trade Commission
261 La. 224

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Dennis COMBS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 52271.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: Dennis Combs applying for remedial writs and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. Applicant’s complaints are not supported by the transcript of the trial proceedings.
1

Sheinberg, Samuel I.

From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:21 PM

To: Walsh, Kathryn E.; Berg, Karen E.; Sheinberg, Samuel I.; Six, Anne; Musick, Vesselina

Subject: FW: 8011.1(d) 

From: Whitehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov> 

Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:20:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) 

To: > 

Cc:

Subject: RE: 8011.1(d) 

CUI

Agree with your instinct on both points.

  

  

  

From:

Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 1:57:27 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) 

To:

Subject: 8011.1(d) 

Hi folks:

  

Under 801.11(d) (and PNPM 94/SBP 1978), we can exclude non‐income producing residences from the natural person

asset aggregation. What about if the residence is now on the market but not yet sold? My instinct is that the market

value of the residence is not included in assets but once the transaction closes, the proceeds will be counted. Is that

correct?

  

In addition, just to confirm, if a natural person controls a company whose total assets exceed the threshold, the fact that

the person owes debts to the company does not impact the calculation in any way, correct? The total asset calculation is

not a net worth calculation.

  

  

  

–––
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      547
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         62
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,018
<PP&E>                                          19,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,647)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,842
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,101
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,729
<SALES>                                          2,830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,233
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,180)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,180)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)

</TABLE>
DATE TIME Total Hydrocarbons

Methane

Non-Methane Hydrocarbons Vinyl Chloride Oxygen Carbon Dioxide Stack Gas Moisture Stack Gas Temperature Stack Gas Velocity Stack Gas Flow Rate Stack Gas Flow Rate



### ETS Project No. 11080 

## TABLE II EMISSION TESTRESULTS

SHINTECH LOUISIANA LLC PLAQUEMINEPLANT GTO-A OUTLET

RUN2 5-Aug-11 1320-1730 PPMv@ 3%02 as propane 30.68 lb/hr 0.53262 PPMv@3%02 30.27 lb/hr 0.51332 PPMv@3%02 as propane 0.41 lb/hr 0.01930 PPBv@3%02 

### < 32 lb/hr 

### < 0.0021 Vol%dry 7.07 Vol%dry 9.1 Vol% 15.290 

### F 259.8 ftlsec 8.43 acf7min 14147.2 dscf/min 8790.1 RUN3 6-Aug-11 0740-ll45

35.95 0.64943 35.42 0.62387 0.53 0.02556



### < 31 

### < 0.0022

6.66 9.3 15.055 251.3 8.36 14040.5 8867.3 RUN4 AVERAGE 6-Aug-11 1300-1705

34.19 33.61 0.56339 0.58181 33.68 33.12 0.54071 0.55930 0.51 0.48 0.02268 0.02251



### < 31 

### < 31 

### < 0.0022 

### < 0.0022

6.42 6.72 9.0 9.1 14.583 14.976 252.3 254.5 8.39 8.39 14079.6 14089.1 8930.8 8862.7



### 2.3.1
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0003754 31-JAN-2017 08:07 AM
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26714]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12540]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a public meeting on Wednesday, June 
13, 2018 at 2:00 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: The public meeting will be held in the Knowles Conference Center 
at Georgia State University College of Law, 85 Park Place Northeast, 
Atlanta, GA 30303.

STATUS: This meeting will begin at 2:00 p.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public. Doors will open at 1:30 p.m. Visitors will be subject to 
security checks. The public meeting will be webcast from 2:00 p.m. to 
3:00 p.m. on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. The public is 
encouraged to RSVP for the meeting at https://www.sec.gov/investing-america.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: This Sunshine Act notice is being issued 
because a quorum of the Commission may attend the meeting. The purpose 
of the meeting is to provide retail investors with an opportunity to 
engage with SEC officials, including the Commissioners.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: June 6, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12540 Filed 6-6-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20580

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 

proceeding the appearance of

□ counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES)

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding,

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being filed.

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission

Room H-113

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Robert Frisby (Attorney)

rfrisby@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Mail Drop CC-9528

Washington, DC 20580

Phone Number: 202-326-2098

Fax Number: 202-326-3197

John Singer (Attorney)

jsinger@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Mail Drop CC-9528

Washington, DC 20580

Phone Number: 202-326-3234

Fax Number: 202-326-3197

California Naturel, Inc. 5/4/2016 James Kohm D09370 (Robert Frisby)

05 04 2016

582527
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of Docket No.

STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING PURSUANT TO 16 C.F.R. § 4.1

California Naturel, Inc.

D09370

Robert Frisby

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Mail Drop CC-9528

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: 202-326-2098

Fax: 202-326-3197

Email: rfrisby@ftc.gov

In connection with the Notice of Appearance filed on May 04, 2016, and pursuant to 16 C.F.R. § 4.1

(d), I state that I am eligible to practice before the Commission as a member of the Bar of the District of

Columbia (Bar No. 411554). As requested by 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 (d), I further state that I am a member of

good standing within the legal profession.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of Docket No.

STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING PURSUANT TO 16 C.F.R. § 4.1

California Naturel, Inc.

D09370

John Singer

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Mail Drop CC-9528

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: 202-326-3234

Fax: 202-326-3197

Email: jsinger@ftc.gov

In connection with the Notice of Appearance filed on May 04, 2016, and pursuant to 16 C.F.R. § 4.1

(d), I state that I am eligible to practice before the Commission as a member of the Bar of the District of

Columbia (Bar No. 411894). As requested by 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 (d), I further state that I am a member of

good standing within the legal profession.