alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY and Insurance Company of North America, Petitioners, v. Homer Lee BERRY and the Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 42648.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1973.

Summers Warden, Coral Gables, for petitioners.

L. Barry Keyfetz, Ser & Keyfetz, Miami, for respondents.

DEKLE, Justice.

This cause involves a certiorari review of an order of the Industrial Relations Commission remanding this matter to the Judge of Industrial Claims for adequate findings of fact. Having heard oral argument, it is our view that the JIC’s findings of fact are sufficient. Therefore, this cause is remanded to the Commission on authority of Sims v. Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners, 277 So.2d 530 (Fla.1973), and Pierce v. Piper Aircraft Corp., 279 So.2d 281 (Fla.1973), with instructions to entertain the application for review upon the findings submitted.

It is so ordered.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7458 

To provide supplemental appropriations to provide direct assistance for domestic pork producers and during the COVID–19 pandemic, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. HAGEDORN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide supplemental appropriations to provide direct assistance for domestic pork producers and during the 

COVID–19 pandemic, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Pork Producer 

5 Assistance Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7458 IH

1 (1) It is imperative that domestic pork pro2 ducers receive financial assistance that adequately 

3 reflects the damages done to the pork industry due 

4 to the COVID–19 pandemic. 

5 (2) While the coronavirus food assistance pro6 gram carried out by the Secretary of Agriculture 

7 provides relief to livestock producers, the pork indus8 try has faced unprecedented challenges due to pack9 ing plants being forced to reduce processing capac10 ity. 

11 (3) To prevent further damage to the pork in12 dustry, further funding assistance that includes di13 rect funding for the pork industry is necessary. 

14 SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR OFFICE OF THE SEC15 RETARY ACCOUNT. 

16 For an additional amount for the ‘‘Office of the Sec17 retary’’, $5,000,000,000 to remain available until ex18 pended to provide support payments to pork producers 

19 with losses of market-ready hogs due to the COVID–19 

20 pandemic: Provided, That such amount is designated by 

21 Congress as being for an emergency requirement pursuant 

22 to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and 

23 Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985: Provided further, 

24 That such amounts shall be made available only if the 

25 President subsequently so designates such amount: ProVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:27 Jul 25, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7458.IH H7458

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7458 IH

1 vided further: That such a payment may be made to a pork 

2 producer (regardless of the adjusted gross income of such 

3 producer) in any amount so long as such amount is not 

4 greater than the total losses of such pork producer of mar5 ket-ready hogs due to the COVID–19 pandemic. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
us , Ocpartmcnt of Assisfant Secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Transportation Washington, DC 20590 

Office of the Secretary 

ofTtonsportotion 

JAN 7 201D 

Ms. Elizabeth Reed 

524 Ludington Street 

Suite LL-103 

Escanaba, Michigan 49829 

Dear Ms. Reed: ^ ^ 

Thank you for Senator Levin's letter enclosing correspondence from one of his 

constituents regarding our selection of SkyWest Airlines, Inc., d/b/a United Express, to 

replace Mesaba Airlines, Inc., d/b/a Delta Connection, to provide Essential Air Service 

(EAS) at Houghton. I am responding on behalf of the Department. 

This EAS case was triggered by Mesaba's filing a 90-day notice of its intent to suspend 

service at Houghton. As a result, we issued an order holding Mesaba in place until 

replacement service could be secured. In response, we received proposals from Mesaba and 

SkyWest. For your convenience, you may view that order by going to Regulations.gov, and 

entering "Order 2009-10-8" in the search box, so I will only briefly summarize it here. 

Under Mesaba's Option 1, it would provide 19 nonstop round trips per week to 

Minneapolis with 34-seat Saab 340 turboprops for $1,532,515 annual subsidy. Mesaba's 

Option 2 was for a total of 21 nonstop round trips per week to Minneapolis and Detroit 

for $2,085,022. SkyWest proposed 14 nonstop round trips per week to Chicago O'Hare 

with 50-seat regional jets for $1,404,714 annual subsidy. 

Despite two Requests for Proposals that explicitly stated the maximum service levels that 

DOT would be willing to subsidize, Mesaba, nonetheless, submitted two proposals that 

exceeded those well-defined levels. On the other hand, SkyWest's proposal complied 

with the request for proposals, hi that regard, SkyWest has a full code-share relationship 

with United Airlines at O'Hare, the second largest airport in the country. Nonstop jet 

service to O'Hare on a United Express carrier clearly meets the core objective of the EAS 

program, namely to keep communities and passengers connected to the national air 

transportation system. The upside potential for traffic at Houghton is significant, and 

DOT anticipates SkyWest's need for subsidy will significantly decrease when the twoyear contract expires. In addition, SkyWest requests $255,602 less subsidy than Mesaba 

over the two-year contract period. 

We appreciate your constituent's concern that passengers stranded overnight in Chicago 

might have less convenient accommodations, and that they might lose their accumulated 

frequent flyer miles on Delta. As a code-share partner of United Airlines, passengers on 

SkyWest are afforded the same accommodations as the rest of United's passengers. 
Finally, we have made SkyWest aware of the lost frequent flier miles and they are 

reviewing the issue with United Airlines. We strongly encourage the community to work 

together with SkyWest to ensure that the new service, scheduled to begin on or about 

March 1, is a success. 

As is our normal practice, we are placing a copy of your letter and this response in 

Docket OST-2009-0302. 

Sincerely yours, 

^ ^ Dennis J. DeVany, 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis
#### Ernest TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1370.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1973.

Ernest Townsend, Jr., in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J„ and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed a memorandum brief in support of his position, and on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is *140wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
No. 10274.

#### Miller, Treasurer, et al. *v.*Stokes.

Decided April 28, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Logan county.

' *Mr. E. Pat Chamberlin*and *Mr. John E. West,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. James Kernan*and *Mr. John P. Bowers,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Si-iauck, C. J., Crew, Summers, Sfear and Davis, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Covista Communications, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended Occtober 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank J. Pazera, CFO
of Covista Communications, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

     1)   Thereport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
          (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Covista Communications, Inc.


Date: December 12, 2003            By: /s/ Frank J. Pazera
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Frank J. Pazera,
                                       Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
                                       Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32



Certification of COO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the quarterly report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John
Marceca, the Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and Edward Kroning, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:
                  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
                        Act of 1934; and
                                         (2)... The information contained in the
                        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
                        financial condition and results of operations of the
                        Company.

      DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

      By:   John Marceca
         ----------------------------------
            John Marceca, President and COO

      Dated: June 1, 2007
             ------------

      By:   Edward Kroning
         -----------------------------------
            Edward Kroning, CFO

      Dated: June 1, 2007
             ------------



                                      -1-

<PAGE>








SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-QSB to be signed on its behalf by its
duly authorized representatives.


                                          DATAMETRICS CORPORATION
                                          ------------------------
                                          /s/ John Marceca
                                          President and Chief Operating Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name                          Title                         Date
-------------------           ------------------------      ---------------
/s/ John Marceca              President & COO               June 1, 2007
-------------------
    John Marceca

/s/ Edward Kroning            Chief Financial Officer       June 1, 2007
-------------------
    Edward Kroning


                                      -2-

<PAGE>
Order filed December 21, 2011

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 10

- 01212

- CR

____________ JUAN MANUEL MESTICO

- RODRIGUEZ , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 174 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1260041



### AMENDED ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T ex as R ule of App ellate P rocedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibits #71 (DVD) and #72 (DVD)

.

The clerk of the 174th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of State's Exhibits #71 (DVD) and #72 (DVD), on or before December 30, 2011

. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this orig inal exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibits #71 (DVD) and #72 (DVD), to the clerk of the 174th District
Court.

PER CURIAM
FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


CAPRICOR, INC.


2012 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION
PLAN


(Adopted February 12, 2014)


 


Capricor Therapeutics,
Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Capricor, Inc. 2012 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, effective
as of September 18, 2012 (the “Plan”), and, pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan, the Company’s Board
of Directors (the “Board”) may at any time amend, alter, suspend or terminate the Plan.


 


The
Board desires to adopt an amendment to the Plan to: (1) change the name of the Plan from the “Capricor, Inc. 2012 Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan” to the “Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. 2012 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan”;
(2) provide that all references to the “Company” shall be deemed to refer to Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. and its Parent
and Subsidiaries, as applicable; (3) to provide for a definition of “Subsidiary”; and (4) provide that all references
in the Plan to “Common Stock” shall mean the common stock of Capricor Therapeutics, Inc., par value $0.001 per share.


 


The
Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


		1.	The name of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



 


“Capricor Therapeutics,
Inc. 2012 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan”


 


		2.	Subsection (i) of Section 2 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



 


““Company”
means Capricor Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its Parent and Subsidiaries, as applicable, or any successor thereto.”


 


		3.	Section 2 of the Plan is amended by adding the following clause (v):



 


““Subsidiary” means a “subsidiary
corporation,” whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Code Section 424(f).”


 


		4.	For purposes of clarity, all references in the Plan to “Common Stock” shall be deemed
to mean the common stock of the Company.



 


		5.	The modifications set forth above shall not affect any other provisions of the Plan.



 


[Signature provided on following page.]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned adopts this First Amendment to the Plan on behalf of the Company as of the date first
written above.


 


 


	 	CAPRICOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Linda Marbán, Ph.D.
	 	 
	 	By: Linda Marbán, Ph.D.
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000035733
<NAME> FINANCIAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            82,075
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           4
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   7,1340
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 116,018
<CASH>                                             839
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               9,150
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          44,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 297,239
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 60,204
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                104
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  43,444
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            5,177
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 55,329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,169
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   297,239
<PREMIUMS>                                      30,284
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              6,583
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,091
<BENEFITS>                                      13,469
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,516
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             9,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,549
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,497
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.26
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-30655, 333-74747,
333-74715, 333-78521, 333-78567, 333-83725, 333-35806, 333-62502, 333-84010,
333-90986, 333-91002, 333-117334 and 333-137396 on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-32221, 333-60277, 333-70335, 333-85269,
333-92361, 333-32526, 333-40698, 333-47914, 333-67978, 333-73274, 333-81170,
and 333-84932 on Form S-3 of our report dated May 28, 2008 relating
to the consolidated financial statements of THQ Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company)
as of and for the year ended March 29, 2008 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to a change
in the accounting for share-based payments and income taxes) and our report
dated May 28, 2008 relating to the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of THQ Inc. for the year ended March 29, 2008.  DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP   Los Angeles, California May 28, 2008
258 La. 211

#### Elroy E. GARVIN v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 51224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 24, 1971.

In re: City of New Orleans applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 243 So.2d 347.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7759 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to forgive the repayment, extend the 

timeline of repayment, and lower the interest rate of Medicare hospital 

accelerated payments made during the COVID–19 public health emergency, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2020 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri (for himself, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mrs. MILLER, Mr. LONG, 

Mr. ARMSTRONG, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee, 

and Mr. FORTENBERRY) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to forgive 

the repayment, extend the timeline of repayment, and 

lower the interest rate of Medicare hospital accelerated 

payments made during the COVID–19 public health 

emergency, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving Rural Hospitals 

5 from Closure Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7759 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING THE FORGIVENESS OF REPAYMENT, 

2 EXTENSION OF REPAYMENT, AND LOWERING 

3 OF INTEREST RATE OF MEDICARE HOSPITAL 

4 ACCELERATED PAYMENTS MADE DURING 

5 THE COVID–19 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. 

6 Section 1815 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

7 1395g) is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (d), by inserting ‘‘subject to 

9 subsection (f)(5),’’ after ‘‘determination,’’; and 

10 (2) in subsection (f)(2)— 

11 (A) in subparagraph (C), by inserting 

12 ‘‘subject to paragraph (5),’’ before ‘‘the Sec13 retary’’; and 

14 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

15 paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(5)(A) Upon the request of a hospital, the 

17 Secretary may forgive the repayment, extend the 

18 timeline of repayment described in subparagraph 

19 (C)(i), and lower the interest rate of any accelerated 

20 payment within 30 days of receiving such request if 

21 such a hospital experiences significant financial 

22 hardship. 

23 ‘‘(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), ‘sig24 nificant financial hardship’ means, with respect to a 

25 hospital, the existence of a serious chance of closure, 

26 impending bankruptcy, large-scale layoffs, or any 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7759 IH

1 other situation the Secretary determines appro2 priate.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 9, 2009 | /s/ Robert S. Hekemian                            |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Robert S. Hekemian                                |
|                               | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|                               |                                              |