alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 5O0-/F SPh/f fPZ-if 90%-tfft>V-/$ f*f-l$ ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA# 05-14-00978-CR OFFENSE: OTHER CRIMINAL Nicholas Davell Amos v. The State 

## STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Dallas COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 291st Judicial District Court DATE: 03/31/2015 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-1341905-U



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS Nicholas Davell Amos v. The State of STYLE: Texas 

## PRO SE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE: £>

# v/all*Q{J~ JUDGE: 

# MA JyL4^*f«—: CCA#: 

# so*'*? setvr &wf CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: 

### ELECTRONIC RECORD
Exhibit 32.1
 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION*
 (Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of QSGI INC., hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge, that:
 
 (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QSGI INC. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: May 22, 2014

/s/ Marc ShermanMarc Sherman

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
   
 __________________
 * The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Reginald Dozier HICKS, Relator, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-1475.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas Corpus dismissed.
#### Dr. John Moody PRESLEY, Appellant, v. The SPRING TERM GRAND JURY 1969 FINAL REPORT, Appellee.

No. 70-224.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 29, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         476,013
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,863
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                17,358
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                59,954
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,732,223
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         802,547
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           799,205
<LOANS>                                      6,748,845
<ALLOWANCE>                                    122,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,208,903
<DEPOSITS>                                   7,802,837
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,080,393
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            148,268
<LONG-TERM>                                    323,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,610
<OTHER-SE>                                     707,533
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,208,903
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                138,702
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               40,567
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,031
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               181,300
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              70,054
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              88,366
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           92,934
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 147
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 99,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,148
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      55,148
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,030
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.09
<LOANS-NON>                                     11,248
<LOANS-PAST>                                    19,038
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 56,594
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               123,265
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,894
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,469
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              122,551
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            69,358
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         53,193
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 264 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.264

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Sunday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-one

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1101 Charlotte Street in Georgetown, South Carolina, as the ``Joseph 
              Hayne Rainey Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JOSEPH HAYNE RAINEY MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1101 Charlotte Street in Georgetown, South Carolina, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Joseph Hayne Rainey Memorial Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Joseph 
Hayne Rainey Memorial Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 749 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to deliver notice of the denial of claims for benefits under the 

laws administered by the Secretary by certified mail, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. LATTA (for himself, Mr. RYAN, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Mr. 

JONES, and Mr. STIVERS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to deliver notice of the denial 

of claims for benefits under the laws administered by 

the Secretary by certified mail, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Right to Ex5 pediency Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 749 IH

1 SEC. 2. DELIVERY OF NOTICE OF DENIAL OF BENEFITS 

2 UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE SEC3 RETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS BY CER4 TIFIED MAIL. 

5 Section 5104(b) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 section: 

8 ‘‘(c) In any case where the Secretary denies a benefit 

9 sought, the notice required by subsection (a) shall be deliv10 ered by certified mail.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John R. KILLIAN.

No. 61110.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1977.

In re: John R. Killian, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied in part, granted in part; Denied as to conviction. However, sentence must be vacated to the extent in conflict. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 8S4 (1968), and remanded for re-sentencing.

CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2298** 

In re: CLEVELAND NELSON, a/k/a Cleve, a/k/a Fat Daddy , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. (No. 3:94

- cr - 00057

- H

- 2)

Submitted : February 25, 2014 Decided: March 6, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Cleveland Nelson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cleveland Nelson petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking a ruling by the district court on his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. Although unreasonable delay in the district court may be a reason to grant mandamus relief, see Johnson v. Rogers , 917 F.2d 1283, 1285 (10th Cir. 1990), the district court’s docket sheets reflects that the court issued an order on February 4, 2014, granting the motion of the Office of the Public Defender to withdraw from its representation of Nelson and permit ting Nelson to proceed pro se. Because there has been recent, significant action in the district court, we conclude that Nelson is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         270,150
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         219,721
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               195,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    663,663
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      6,322,346
<ALLOWANCE>                                     86,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,184,274
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,195,852
<SHORT-TERM>                                   624,637
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            281,190
<LONG-TERM>                                    313,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       165,952
<OTHER-SE>                                     602,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               8,184,274
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                409,128
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               35,584
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                14,178
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               458,890
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             155,610
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,182
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          260,708
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   18,191
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 140
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                223,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,450
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      65,426
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.40
<LOANS-NON>                                     31,767
<LOANS-PAST>                                    35,086
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                30,716
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                82,596
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   19,465
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,927
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               86,249
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            47,500
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              1,845
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         36,904
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4869]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 33360]


Southern Pacific Transportation Company; Trackage Rights 
Exemption; Union Pacific Railroad Company

    Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) has agreed to grant overhead 
trackage rights to Southern Pacific Transportation Company (SP) over 
trackage known as the Port of Brownsville Lead Track, extending from 
the SP connection at milepost 3.21 to milepost 9.36, and over trackage 
from milepost 7.60 to milepost 7.90 at the connection to the Port of 
Brownsville trackage, a total distance of approximately 6.45 miles near 
Brownsville, TX. The trackage rights will result in improved and more 
efficient train operations and will eliminate rail traffic congestion 
in downtown Brownsville.
    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on or after 
February 14, 1997.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33360, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423.\1\ In addition, a copy of each 
pleading must be served on Joseph D. Anthofer, Esq., 1416 Dodge Street, 
#830, Omaha, NE 68179.

    \1\ Due to the Board's scheduled relocation on March 16, 1997, 
any filings made after March 16, 1997, must be filed with the 
Surface Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 
20423-0001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Decided: February 20, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4869 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES CONTAINED IN FORM 10-KSB AS
FILED HEREWITH, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          2,595,444
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,095,216
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                4,881,195
<PP&E>                          5,100,388
<DEPRECIATION>                 (1,633,762)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,363,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           3,451,746
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              79,100
<PREFERRED>                       460,000
<COMMON>                        8,386,273
<OTHER-SE>                     (4,313,682)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,363,437
<SALES>                         9,668,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                9,997,594
<CGS>                           5,500,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   8,224,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  357,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 14,926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,400,407
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,398,807
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,398,807
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .34
        

</TABLE>
United States of America 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Division of Advertising Practices

November 10, 2020 

Via Electronic Mail (lbrett@bbbnp.org) 

Laura Brett, Esq. 

Vice President 

National Advertising Division 

112 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

Re: Advertising by Leptitox Nutrition for Leptitox dietary supplement 

Dear Ms. Brett: 

On September 22, 2020, the National Advertising Division referred to the Federal Trade 

Commission an NAD Decision regarding advertising by Leptitox Nutrition for Leptitox, a 

dietary supplement purported to cause weight loss. We understand that this past June, the 

Council for Responsible Nutrition filed an NAD Challenge against Leptitox Nutrition. Despite 

several attempts to identify and reach the advertiser, NAD received no response to its inquiry. 

Accordingly, you referred this matter to the FTC for review. 

Upon careful review of this referral, we have determined not to take additional action at 

this time. In reaching this conclusion, we considered a number of factors including enforcement 

priorities, resource allocation, the nature of any FTC Act violation, and the type and severity of 

any consumer injury. 

The staff’s decision to forego a formal investigation at this time is not to be construed as 

a determination that a violation may not have occurred, just as the pendency of an investigation 

should not be construed as a determination that a violation has occurred. The Commission 

reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. The FTC 

appreciates your referral and the opportunity to continue to assist in supporting the NAD. 

Very Truly Yours, 

s/ Carolyn L. Hann

Carolyn L. Hann 

Chief of Staff for Advertising Practices
255 La. 163

#### Robert Edgar STREET v. Helen Burnett STREET.

No. 50272.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 16, 1970.

In re: Helen Burnett Street applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, and for stay order.

Writ refused. The ruling complained of is correct.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1086** 

CAROL JEFFERSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a Amtrak , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 8:15

- cv
- 02275

- DKC )

Submitted : October 18, 2016 Decided: November 18, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Leland Alan Stark, Santa Monica, California, for Appellant. Christy Ann Fisher, John Christopher Nosher, BONNER KIERNAN TREBACH & CROCIATA LLP , Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Carol Jefferson appeals the district court ’ s order s dismissing her complaint for insufficient service of process and
denying her motion for reconsideration . We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Jefferson v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger
Corp. , No. 8:15

- cv
- 02275

- DKC (D. Md. Oct

. 21, 2015 ; Dec

. 23,
2015)

. We disp ense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED