27728 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

the ALIs required by paragraph (i) of AD 

2017–22–03. 

(2) For airplanes identified in Airbus 

A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness 

Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant 

Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI), 

Variation 6.1, dated May 18, 2017: 

Concurrently with the revision required by 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, revise the 

maintenance or inspection program, as 

applicable, to incorporate the ALIs specified 

in Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 

Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2— 

Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation 

Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.1, dated May 18, 

2017. The initial compliance time for 

accomplishing the actions is at the applicable 

time identified in the ALIs specified in 

Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 

Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2— 

Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation 

Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.1, dated May 18, 

2017, or within 90 days after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later; 

without exceeding the inspection intervals in 

the ALIs required by paragraph (i) of AD 

2017–22–03. 

(3) For airplanes identified in Airbus 

A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness 

Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant 

Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI), 

Variation 6.2, dated May 24, 2017: 

Concurrently with the revision required by 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, revise the 

maintenance or inspection program, as 

applicable, to incorporate the ALIs specified 

in A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness 

Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant 

Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI), 

Variation 6.2, dated May 24, 2017. The initial 

compliance time for accomplishing the 

actions is at the applicable time identified in 

the ALIs specified in Airbus A318/A319/ 

A320/A321 Airworthiness Limitation Section 

Part 2—Damage Tolerant Airworthiness 

Limitation Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.2, 

dated May 24, 2017, or within 90 days after 

the effective date of this AD, whichever 

occurs later; without exceeding the 

inspection intervals in the ALIs required by 

paragraph (i) of AD 2017–22–03. 

(h) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and 

Critical Design Configuration Control 

Limitations (CDCCLs) 

After the maintenance or inspection 

program has been revised as required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative 

actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be 

used unless the actions or intervals are 

approved as an alternative method of 

compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of 

this AD. 

(i) Terminating Action for Other FAA ADs 

(1) Accomplishing the action required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the 

requirements of paragraphs (g) and (j) of AD 

2016–09–06. 

(2) Accomplishing the action required by 

paragraph (g) of this AD terminates the 

requirements of paragraphs (g)(2) and (i) of 

AD 2017–22–03. 

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 

39.19, send your request to your principal 

inspector or local Flight Standards District 

Office, as appropriate. If sending information 

directly to the International Section, send it 

to the attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k)(2) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. 

(i) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(ii) AMOCs previously approved for AD 

2015–05–02, Amendment 39–18112 (80 FR 

15152, March 23, 2015) that required 

incorporation of the service information in 

paragraphs (j)(1)(ii)(A), (j)(1)(ii)(B), 

(j)(1)(ii)(C), or (j)(1)(ii)(D), are approved as 

AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of 

this AD. 

(A) Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 

Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2— 

Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation 

Items (DT–ALI), Revision 06, dated April 10, 

2017. 

(B) Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 

Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2— 

Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation 

Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.1, dated May 18, 

2017. 

(C) Airbus A318/A319/A320/A321 

Airworthiness Limitation Section Part 2 

–Damage Tolerant Airworthiness Limitation 

Items (DT–ALI), Variation 6.2, dated May 24, 

2017. 

(D) A318/A319/A320/A321 Airworthiness 

Limitation Section Part 2—Damage Tolerant 

Airworthiness Limitation Items (DT–ALI), 

Variation 6.3, October 24, 2017. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Section, 

Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the 

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or 

Airbus’s EASA Design Organization 

Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, 

the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD 

2017–0231, dated November 21, 2017, for 

related information. This MCAI may be 

found in the AD docket on the internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–0512. 

(2) For more information about this AD, 

contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Section, Transport Standards 

Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des 

Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206– 

231–3223. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness 

Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice 

Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; 

telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 

93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@

airbus.com; internet http://www.airbus.com. 

You may view this service information at the 

FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 

South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. 

Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on June 

6, 2018. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Director, System Oversight Division, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2018–12733 Filed 6–13–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

20 CFR Part 401 

[Docket No. SSA–2015–0003] 

RIN 0960–AI08 

Social Security Administration 

Violence Evaluation and Reporting 

System 

AGENCY: Social Security Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: In today’s Federal Register, 

the Social Security Administration 

(SSA) separately published, notice of a 

new system of records, Social Security 

Administration Violence Evaluation and 

Reporting System (SSAvers). Because 

this system will contain investigatory 

material compiled for law enforcement 

purposes, this proposed rule will 

exempt those records from specific 

provisions of the Privacy Act. 

DATES: To ensure that your comments 

are considered, we must receive them 

no later than July 16, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by any one of three methods—internet, 

fax, or mail. Do not submit the same 

comments multiple times or by more 

than one method. Regardless of which 

method you choose, please state that 

your comments refer to Docket No. 

SSA–2015–0003, so that we may 

associate your comments with the 

correct regulation. 

Caution: You should be careful to 

include in your comments only 

information that you wish to make 

publicly available. We strongly urge you 

not to include in your comments any 

personal information, such as Social 

Security numbers or medical 

information. 

1. Internet: We strongly recommend 

that you submit your comments via the 

internet. Please visit the Federal 

eRulemaking portal at http:// 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules 27729 

www.regulations.gov. Use the Search 

function to find docket number SSA– 

2015–0003. The system will issue a 

tracking number to confirm your 

submission. You will not be able to 

view your comment immediately 

because we must post each comment 

manually. It may take up to a week for 

your comment to be viewable. 

2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966– 

2830. 

3. Mail: Address your comments to 

the Office of Regulations and Reports 

Clearance, Social Security 

Administration, 3100 West High Rise, 

6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21235–6401. 

Comments are available for public 

viewing on the Federal eRulemaking 

portal at http://www.regulations.gov or 

in person, during regular business 

hours, by arranging with the contact 

person identified below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pamela J. Carcirieri, Supervisory 

Government Information Specialist, 

SSA, Office of Privacy and Disclosure, 

6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21235–6401, Phone: (410) 

965–0355, for information about this 

rule. For information on eligibility or 

filing for benefits, call our national tollfree number, 1–800–772–1213 or TTY 

1–800–325–0778, or visit our internet 

site, Social Security Online, at http://

www.socialsecurity.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In accordance with the Privacy Act (5 

U.S.C. 552a), we are issuing public 

notice of our intent to establish a new 

system of records entitled, Social 

Security Administration Violence 

Evaluation and Reporting System 

(SSAvers) (60–0379). On April 18, 2012, 

President Obama issued the 

memorandum, Establishing Policies for 

Addressing Domestic Violence in the 

Federal Workforce, which directed the 

Office of Personnel Management to 

issue guidance to all departments and 

agencies to create policy that addressed 

domestic violence, sexual assault, and 

stalking. Because of this guidance, we 

developed the Workplace and Domestic 

Violence policy and program. We 

established SSAvers as part of this 

policy and program to record, review, 

investigate, and respond to allegations 

of workplace and domestic violence 

affecting our employees and contractors. 

We are establishing SSAvers as part of 

our compliance efforts under Title VII of 

the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 

Congressional Accountability Act of 

1995; 29 U.S.C. 51, Occupational Safety 

and Health Act of 1970; 29 CFR 1960, 

Basic Program Elements for Federal 

Employee Occupational Safety and 

Health Programs and Related Matters; 

41 CFR 102–74, Subpart C, Conduct on 

Federal Property; 5 CFR 735, Employee 

Responsibilities and Conduct; 5 CFR 

2635, Standards of Ethical Conduct for 

Employees of the Executive Branch; and 

various other statutes related to 

handling incidents of workplace and 

domestic violence. 

SSAvers will capture and house 

information regarding alleged incidents 

of workplace and domestic violence 

filed by SSA employees and SSA 

contractors, and will allow SSA’s Crisis 

Advisory Team (CAT) to review and 

respond to the reported allegations. Due 

to the investigatory nature of 

information that we will maintain in 

this system of records, we propose this 

rule to add SSAvers to the list of SSA 

systems that are exempt from specific 

provisions of the Privacy Act pursuant 

to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2). 

Rulemaking Analyses and Notices 

We will consider all comments 

received on or before the close of 

business on the comment closing date 

previously indicated, and we will make 

the comments available for examination 

in the docket at the previously noted 

address. We will file comments received 

after the comment closing date in the 

docket, and we will consider them to 

the extent practicable. We may publish 

a final rule at any time after close of the 

comment period. 

Clarity of This Rule 

Executive Order 12866, as 

supplemented by Executive Order 

13563, requires each agency to write all 

rules in plain language. In addition to 

your substantive comments on this 

interim final rule, we invite your 

comments on how to make the rule 

easier to understand. 

For example: 

• Would more, but shorter, sections 

be better? 

• Are the requirements in the rule 

clearly stated? 

• Have we organized the material to 

suit your needs? 

• Could we improve clarity by adding 

tables, lists, or diagrams? 

• What else could we do to make the 

rule easier to understand? 

• Does the rule contain technical 

language or jargon that is not clear? 

• Would a different format make the 

rule easier to understand, e.g. grouping 

and order of sections, use of headings, 

paragraphing? 

Regulatory Procedures 

SSA will publish a final rule 

responding to any comments received 

and, if appropriate, will amend 

provisions of the rule. 

Executive Order 12866, as 

Supplemented by Executive Order 

13563 

We consulted with the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) and 

determined that this final rule does not 

meet the criteria for a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866, as supplemented by Executive 

Order 13563. Therefore, OMB did not 

review it. 

We also determined that this final 

rule meets the plain language 

requirement of Executive Order 12866. 

Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) 

We analyzed this proposed rule in 

accordance with the principles and 

criteria established by Executive Order 

13132, and we determined that the 

proposed rule will not have sufficient 

Federalism implications to warrant the 

preparation of a Federalism assessment. 

We also determined that this proposed 

rule will not preempt any State law or 

State regulation or affect the States’ 

abilities to discharge traditional State 

governmental functions. 

Executive Order 12372 

(Intergovernmental Review) 

The regulations effectuating Executive 

Order 12372 regarding 

intergovernmental consultation on 

Federal programs and activities apply to 

this proposed rule. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

We certify that this proposed rule will 

not have a significant economic impact 

on a substantial number of small entities 

because it affects individuals only. 

Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act, as amended, does not require us to 

prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

These rules do not create any new or 

affect any existing collections and, 

therefore, do not require Office of 

Management and Budget approval 

under the Paperwork Reduction Act. 

List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 401 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Privacy. 

Nancy Berryhill, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, we are amending part 401 of 

title 20 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations as set forth below: 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
27730 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 115 / Thursday, June 14, 2018 / Proposed Rules 

PART 401—PRIVACY AND 

DISCLOSURE OF OFFICIAL RECORDS 

AND INFORMATION 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 401 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: Secs. 205, 702(a)(5), 1106, and 

1141 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

405, 902(a)(5), 1306, and 1320b–11); 5 U.S.C. 

552 and 552a; 8 U.S.C. 1360; 26 U.S.C. 6103; 

30 U.S.C. 923. 

■ 2. Amend § 401.85, by adding 

paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(G) to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) * * * 

(ii) * * * 

(G) Social Security Administration 

Violence Evaluation and Reporting 

System, SSA. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2018–12819 Filed 6–13–18; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4191–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2016–0963] 

RIN 1625–AA09 

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; 

Tchefuncta River, Madisonville, LA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

change the operating schedule that 

governs the State Route 22 Bridge 

(Madisonville (SR 22) swing span 

bridge) across the Tchefuncta River, 

mile 2.5, at Madisonville, St. Tammany 

Parish, Louisiana. This action is 

necessary to relieve vehicular traffic 

congestion along SR 22 near 

Madisonville, LA during peak, 

afternoon weekday traffic periods. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before July 16, 2018. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2016–0963 using Federal eRulemaking 

Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for 

further instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions about this proposed 

rulemaking, call or email Mr. Doug 

Blakemore, Eighth Coast Guard District 

Bridge Administrator; telephone (504) 

671–2128, email Douglas.A.Blakemore@

uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

LA–DOTD Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed 

rulemaking 

II. Background, Purpose and Legal 

Basis 

The State Route 22 Bridge 

(Madisonville (SR 22) swing span 

bridge) across the Tchefuncta River, 

mile 2.5, at Madisonville, St. Tammany 

Parish, Louisiana, is regulated under 33 

CFR 117.500 and has a vertical 

clearance of 6.2 feet above Mean High 

Water in the closed-to-navigation 

position and unlimited clearance in the 

open-to-navigation position. The draw 

of this bridge opens on signal from 7 

p.m. to 6 a.m. From 6 a.m. to 7 p.m., the 

draw opens on the hour and half hour, 

except that from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 

from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. Monday through 

Friday except federal holidays, the draw 

opens only on the hour. Navigation on 

the waterway consists primarily of 

recreational traffic as the largest 

commercial facility upstream of the 

bridge is no longer in service. 

On November 4, 2016, at the request 

of the Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development (LA– 

DOTD), the Coast Guard issued a 

temporary deviation titled ‘‘Drawbridge 

Operation Regulations; Tchefuncta 

River, Madisonville, LA’’ (81 FR 76866). 

There, we stated that the 180-day 

deviation would test a temporary 

change to the operating schedule of the 

Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge 

to determine whether a permanent 

change is necessary. From November 21, 

2016 through May 18, 2017, this 

deviation extended the time between 

openings from 30 minutes to an hour 

between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m. daily, and 

allowed the bridge to remain closed at 

8 a.m., 5 p.m., and 6 p.m.. Monday 

through Friday except federal holidays. 

During the comment period that closed 

on January 18, 2017, we received no 

comments. 

On November 4, 2016, concurrent 

with the test deviation and on the basis 

of a recent traffic study conducted by 

LA–DOTD, the Coast Guard published a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

titled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation 

Regulations; Tchefuncta River, 

Madisonville, LA’’ (81 FR 76889). 

There, we stated that the traffic study 

indicated that the intersection of SR 22 

and SR 21/SR1077 is over capacity at 

peak hours and causes unacceptable 

levels of delay to roadway traffic, which 

is compounded by the opening of the 

Madisonville (SR 22) swing span bridge 

during peak hours. The traffic study also 

indicated that a combination of 

modifications of the traffic controls at 

this intersection and the operating 

schedule of the Madisonville (SR 22) 

swing span bridge would enhance the 

flow of vehicular traffic over SR 22. The 

NPRM proposed a change to the 

schedule of the Madisonville (SR 22) 

swing span bridge that extended the 

time between openings from 30 minutes 

to an hour between 6 a.m. and 7 p.m. 

daily, and allowed the bridge to remain 

closed at 8 a.m., 5 p.m., and 6 p.m.. 

Monday through Friday except federal 

holidays. During the comment period 

that closed on January 18, 2017, we 

received no comments. 

LA–DOTD planned to conduct a study 

of vehicular traffic flow over the bridge 

as it related to a four way stop sign and 

traffic light at the intersection of SR 22 

and SR 21 during the temporary 

deviation period. The LA–DOTD 

planned to complete four separate traffic 

studies at this intersection: A baseline 

traffic analysis across the SR 22 bridge 

with the original regulation and a fourway stop sign in place at the 

intersection of SR 22 and SR 21, a traffic 

analysis with the temporary deviation to 

the regulation and a four-way stop sign 

in place at the intersection of SR 22 and 

SR 21, a traffic analysis with the 

temporary deviation to the regulation 

and a traffic light in place at the 

intersection of SR 22 and SR 21, and a 

traffic analysis with the original 

regulation and a traffic light in place at 

the intersection of SR 22 and SR 21. On 

May 18, 2017, the temporary deviation 

expired at the end of its scheduled 180 

days. 

III. Discussion of Comments and 

Change 

On May 26, 2017, LA–DOTD 

requested that the Coast Guard 

permanently change the regulation 

based on information provided in the 

traffic study, which is available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. LA–DOTD also provided 

supplemental data and information on 

the population growth in St. Tammany 

Parish, including information on vehicle 

traffic counts on SR 22 from 2015, the 

locations of schools in the vicinity of SR 

22 that contribute to vehicle congestion, 

St. Tammany Parish projected 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS