alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 21.01**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGSITRANT**

 
| **SUBSIDIARY**            | ** ** | **JURISDICTION  OF INCORPORATION** |
|---------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|
|                      |       |                               |
| Poet Holdings, Inc        |       | Delaware                           |
|                      |       |                               |
| Poet Software Corporation |       | Delaware                           |
|                      |       |                               |
| Versant Gmbh              |       | Germany                            |
|                      |       |                               |
| Versant Ltd.              |       | United Kingdom                     |
|                      |       |                               |
| Mokume Software, Inc.     |       | California                         |
|                      |       |                               |
| FastObjects, Inc.         |       | California                         |
|                      |       |                               |
| Versant India             |       | India                              |

 

----
#### L. D. GATELY VOLKSWAGEN, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. RICHARD BANDLER COMPANY, INC., a New York Corporation doing business in the State of Florida, and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, a New York Corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 73-1481.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Frederick Pfieffer, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**PaineWebber
      R&D Partners III, L.P.**




CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of PaineWebber R&D Partners III, L.P. (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Robert J. Chersi, Principal Financial Officer of PaineWebber Development Corp.,
      as General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Partnership.








/s/
      ROBERT J. CHERSI


Robert
      J.
      Chersi


Vice
      President (Chief Financial and Accounting Officer)


of
      PaineWebber Development Corporation


March
      31,
      2006
#### In re Jessie BELLAMY v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte Jessie Bellamy.

77-693.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 25, 1978.

Roger C. Appell and Robert Bryan of Bryan, Wiggins, Quinn & Appell, Birmingham, for petitioner.

*1144No briefs for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari requests this Court to review a “No Opinion” affirmance by the Court of Criminal Appeals, 361 So.2d 1143 with the judgment of conviction and sentence ordered by the trial Court. Petitioner does not invoke Rule 39(k), ARAP. Thus, the writ is denied.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
No. 00-425.

No. 00-444.

#### Crane *v.*Stern; and United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts et al. *v.*Stern.

C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F. 3d 4.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)October 30, 2012(Date of earliest event reported)October 30, 2012





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---







The information disclosed in these Items 2.02 and 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall they be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.





Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial ConditionSee discussion below under Item 7.01, Regulation FD Disclosure.Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn October 30, 2012, we announced our results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, and affirmed our 2012 earnings guidance ranges.  The news release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein.Item 9.01Financial Statements and ExhibitsExhibits99.1  News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L. P. dated October 30, 2012.








2





---







SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:October 30, 2012By:/s/ Robert F. MartinovichRobert F. MartinovichExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer








3
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 26, 2016














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---










Item 2.02    Results of Operations and Financial Condition





Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the "Company") has reported its results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2016 , as described in Company's press release dated October 26, 2016 , a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01.         Financial Statements and Exhibits





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press release issued by the Registrant dated October 26, 2016.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:October 26, 2016By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E C AT AL I NO QU I NT E R OS RA M O S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 72907 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 130- 907 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , an dF I S H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . J os e C a t a l i no Q ui nt e r os R am os , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s b a s e do n in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. 

# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 72907 2 O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e nan dr e v ie w d e n o v o qu e s tio n s o f law . Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 40 0 F . 3d 78 5, 79 1-92 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). W e deny i n p art an dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng Q ui nt e r os R am os ’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n w he r e Q ui nt e r os R a m os ha s note s t abl i s he d pr e j udi c e f r om hi s pr i or c o u n s e l’s a lle g e din e f

f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e . Se e id. at79 3-94 (pre j ud i ce re sul t s w hen

“ the pe r f orm anc e of

c ouns e l w a s s o i na de qua t e tha ti tm ayhave a f f e c t e d the o u tc o m e o f

th e p r o c e e d in g s ” ) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on ove rQ ui nt e r os R am os ’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe i m m i gr a t i on j udge f

a i l e d t o a dvi s e Q ui nt e r os R am os pr ope r l yaboutthe fin g erp rin ti n g re qu irem en t b ec au se th is is n o t a ti m ely c h allen g e to th e a g en cy ’s p r io ro r d e r . Se e Si n gh v . I NS , 31 5 F . 3d 11 86 , 11 88 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

Air Pollution Control Division 

Mr. Robert Rogers, Technical Manager 

Pollution Control Section 

Shelby County Health Department 

814 Jefferson Ave., 4th Floor 

Memphis, TN 38105 

March 17, 2014 

Dear Mr. Rogers, 

The Air Pollution Control Division would like to provide the following comments 

regarding Shelby County's revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) that is 

currently out for public notice. With regards to the OSP (off-set plan), we submit the 

following comments: 

1. The emissions in Table 1 reflect tons/day. The discussion references tons/year. 

How were the tons/year derived? Was a model run conducted to generate the 

emissions in tons/year? 

2. Does the point source inventory for 2021 reflect all changes to the point source 

sector (other than Cleo Inc.) that have occurred since the second half of the 

maintenance plan was originally submitted? Have other industries expanded or 

shut down since this maintenance plan was last submitted? If so, are those 

changes to the emissions inventory reflected here? If not, why not? 

3. Page 11, 151 paragraph, the third sentence seems to indicate that there are 

reductions of NOx and VOCs from point sources, which is not borne out by the 

tables. In the second paragraph, the safety margins allocated to the MVEB do 

not appear to match the information in Table Ill. 

4. The emissions inventory does not show interim emissions estimates between 

2006 and 2021. 

5. The documentation lacked information on how the inputs for the MOVES model 

were developed. 

6. What was the source of the VMT used? What are the VMT for each of the 

analysis years? 
7. What version of the MOVES database was used? 

8. How was the source type population developed and adjusted over time? 

9. How were the compliance factors in the IM inputs calculated? 

10. Why is the endModeiYear 2002 in the 2006 IM input file? Did the 4 year 

exemption apply then? When did the change to the ordinance for the 4 year 

exemption take effect? 

11 . The last paragraph on page 9 seems to indicate that the MVEBs did not change 

as provided in the 2010 ozone maintenance plan. Is this true? Table Ill and 

subsequent discussion do not agree with th.is statement. 

12. Table Ill has a column indicating 'On-Road Allocation Percent'- these values 

appears to be a fraction, not a percent. The last column states that this is the 

"On-Road Safety Margin"; the safety margin identified in 40 CFR 93.101 

indicates that any safety margin is not explicitly for onroad- it is the overall 

safety margin, some of which (95% in this case) is being applied towards the 

MVEB. The column headings are somewhat confusing. 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the revisions to the maintenance plan. 

Sincerely, 

~!Director 

pHens PE 

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen A. Sherwin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Cell Genesys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Cell Genesys, Inc.

Dated: February 28, 2008



By:

/S/    STEPHEN A. SHERWIN, M.D.Name: Stephen A. Sherwin, M.D. Title: Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7502 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

101 South 16th Street in Clarinda, Iowa, as the ‘‘Jessie Field 

Shambaugh Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2020 

Mrs. AXNE (for herself, Ms. FINKENAUER, Mr. LOEBSACK, and Mr. KING of 

Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 101 South 16th Street in Clarinda, Iowa, 

as the ‘‘Jessie Field Shambaugh Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JESSIE FIELD SHAMBAUGH POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 101 South 16th Street in 

7 Clarinda, Iowa, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Jessie Field Shambaugh Post Office Building’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7502 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jessie Field 

5 Shambaugh Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-30655, 333-74747, 333-74715,333-78521, 333-78567, 333-83725, 333-35806, 333-62502, 333-84010, 333-90986 and333-91002 of THQ Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32221,333-60277, 333-70335, 333-85269, 333-92361, 333-32526, 333-40698,333-47914,  333-81170, 333-84932 and333-98221 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 25, 2003 (which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphregarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” effective January 1, 2002), appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. for the year ended December 31,2002.

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

March 31, 2003

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.3

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2004, hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant.



HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

/s/: William A. Lauby
---------------------
William A. Lauby
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         22,115
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                3,543
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     8,303
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                       422,597
<ALLOWANCE>                                     6,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                485,410
<DEPOSITS>                                    415,928
<SHORT-TERM>                                    1,929
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             3,857
<LONG-TERM>                                    25,482
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       17,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                485,410
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 9,449
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 205
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   78
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                9,732
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              4,230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              4,622
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           5,110
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     213
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 3,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,076
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      2,076
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   5.14
<LOANS-NON>                                     2,174
<LOANS-PAST>                                    1,045
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 1,477
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                6,112
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    (147)
<RECOVERIES>                                       33
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               6,211
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            6,211
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         2,033
        


</TABLE>
256 La. 229

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence WILLIAMS.

No. 50124.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 4, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1970.

Milton P. Masinter, New Orleans, for appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., William P. Schuler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Garrison, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The defendant, Clarence Williams, having appealed from his conviction and sentence, on a charge by bill of information with possession of heroin, without having reserved or perfected a bill of exception to the only alleged error committed during the trial of the case, i. e., “the denial of a new trial based upon alleged misconduct of the prosecution in seeking to impeach a key defense witness in an unfair manner,” nothing is presented for review by this *579court except error patent on the face of the record,1 of which, after careful examination we find none.

The conviction and sentence are affirmed.

1

. Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 920 provides: “The following matters and no others shall be considered on appeal:

(1) Formal bills of exceptions that have been submitted to and signed by the trial court in accordance with Article 845, whether or not the bills of exceptions were made a ground for a motion for a new trial; and

(2) Any error that is discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence.”

See also, Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 844, and State v. Flanagan, 254 La. 100, 222 So.2d 872; State v. Bass, 254 La. 83, 222 So.2d 865; State v. Jackson, 253 La. 205, 217 So.2d 372; State v. Coffil, 222 La. 487, 62 So.2d 651; State v. Bryant, 219 La. 193, 52 So.2d 543; State v. McDonald, 218 La. 198, 48 So.2d 797.
ACCEPTED06-14-00036-CVSIXTH COURT OF APPEALSTEXARKANA, TEXAS3/13/2015 2:38:15 PMDEBBIE AUTREYCLERK