alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Brunner, Christine

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 7:03 PM

To: Brunner, Christine

Subject: EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86)

Attachments: EO_12866_ Tier 3_Final_Rule_Summary_CommentsV2_2_19_2014.docx

Importance: High

For the docket 

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 6:57 PM 

To: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Subject: EO 12866 Comments on Tier 3 draft final rule (RIN 2060-AQ86) 

Kathryn, 

 Attached are a few comments on the Tier 3 RIA. Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Thanks, 

Chad
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-89145,
333-30578, 333-14037, 333-71442, 333-49806, 333-67825,333-35527,
333-104129, 333-110422, 333-120183, 33-82894, 333-130675, and333-136974
on Form S-8; No. 333-66934 on Form S-4; and No. 333-141393on
Form S-3 of BE Aerospace, Inc. of our reports dated February25, 2010
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement
schedule of BE Aerospace, Inc., and the effectiveness of internalcontrol
over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofBE
Aerospace, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009.








/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP




Boca Raton, Florida


February 25, 2010
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

02 28 2020 

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 597764 

Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal, Inc. D09391

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 

proceeding the appearance of 

□X counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) ORIGINAL 

□ counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

□ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

number of each counsel or representative entering an partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

appearance in the above proceeding, this Notice of Appearance is being filed. 

Daniel Matheson (Attorney)

 dmatheson@ftc.gov

Amy E. Dobrzynski (Attorney)

 adobrzynski@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Phone Number: 202-326-2075

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

Dominic Vote

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED 

(Daniel Matheson) 2/28/2020

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

In the Matter of Docket No. 

D09391

Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal,

Inc.

STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING PURSUANT TO 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 

 In connection with the Notice of Appearance filed on February 28, 2020, and pursuant to 16 C.F.R. §

4.1 (d), I state that I am eligible to practice before the Commission as a member of the Bar of the District

of Columbia (Bar No. 502490). As requested by 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 (d), I further state that I am a member of

good standing within the legal profession.

Daniel Matheson

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: 202-326-2075

Email: dmatheson@ftc.gov
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

In the Matter of Docket No. 

STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING PURSUANT TO 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 

 In connection with the Notice of Appearance filed on February 28, 2020, and pursuant to 16 C.F.R. §

4.1 (d), I state that I am eligible to practice before the Commission as a member of the Bar of the State of

Maryland (Bar No. no number assigned). As requested by 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 (d), I further state that I am a

member of good standing within the legal profession.

Amy E. Dobrzynski

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: 202-326-2075

Email: adobrzynski@ftc.gov
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8927-8928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[A-583-815]


Certain Welded Stainless Steel Pipe From Taiwan, Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review; Time Limit

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Extension of Time Limit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit for the final results of the third administrative review of 
the antidumping duty order on welded stainless steel pipe from Taiwan. 
The review covers one manufacturer/exporter of the subject merchandise 
to the United States, Ta Chen Stainless Pipe Company, Ltd., and the 
period

[[Page 8928]]

December 1, 1994 through November 30, 1995.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert M. James at (202) 482-5222 or 
John Kugelman at (202) 482-0649, AD/CVD Enforcement Office Eight, 
Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department initiated this administrative 
review on February 1, 1996 (61 FR 3670). On September 12, 1996, we 
extended the time limit for the preliminary results of administrative 
review. See Notice of Extension of Time Limits, 61 FR 48126. On January 
10, 1997, we published in the Federal Register the preliminary results 
of this administrative review (62 FR 1435).
    Because it is not practicable to complete this review within the 
time limits mandated by section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994, the Department 
is extending the time limit for completion of the final results until 
July 8, 1997. See Memorandum from Joseph A. Spetrini to Robert S. 
LaRussa, on file in Room B-099 of the Main Commerce Building. The 
deadline for the final results of review will now be July 8, 1997 
(i.e., 180 days after the publication of our preliminary results).
    This extension is in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-4929 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Opinion issued August 3 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 17
- 00356
- CV

——————————— ACUITY MARKETING, IN C., TOM WALTER HAYNE S,

AND SHAWN HAYNES , Appella nt s

V. ELIZABETH ANNE WHITS ELL , Appell e e
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No . 3

Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. CV
- 0078158

MEMORANDUM OPINION The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM
Pane l consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.
#### James R. FRANKENBERRY, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44778.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 28, 1974.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1780

In re: RICHARD P. MEABON; EVELYN L. MEABON

------------------------------

RICHARD P. MEABON,

Debtor – Appellant,

v.

R. KEITH JOHNSON,

Trustee – Appellee,

and

EVELYN L. MEABON,

Debtor.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:15-cv-00398-RJC; 10-30455; 12-

03218)

Submitted: September 7, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Kurt Friedrich Hausler, HAUSLER LAW FIRM, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for 

Appellant. R. Keith Johnson, Stanley, North Carolina; John C. Woodman, SODOMA 

LAW, P.C., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In 2010, Richard P. Meabon filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief and received a 

discharge. However, the bankruptcy court revoked Meabon’s discharge in 2014 because 

Meabon improperly failed to disclose certain trust interests on his Chapter 7 petition. 

Meabon appealed the revocation order to the district court, which dismissed his appeal as 

frivolous. In 2015, Meabon filed a Rule 60(b) motion in bankruptcy court seeking relief 

from the order revoking his discharge. The bankruptcy court denied his motion, and 

Meabon appealed to the district court. The district court again entered an order dismissing

the appeal as frivolous. Meabon now appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order denying his Rule 60(b) motion.

Meabon asserts that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing his appeal 

as frivolous. After reviewing the record and the district court’s opinion, we find the 

district court did not abuse its discretion or commit other reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Meabon v. 

Johnson, No. 3:15-cv-00398-RJC (W.D.N.C. June 6, 2016). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 10007.

#### The Trustees of Cadiz Township *v.*Hines, Treas.

Decided March 17, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Harrison county.

*Mr. D. Cunningham*and *Mr. William T. Perry,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. B. W. Rowland,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Fansteel Inc. as of September 30, 1995 and the
related consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
Form 10-Q filing for the period ended September 30, 1995.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       7,717,023
<SECURITIES>                                   982,040
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,598,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                   276,440
<INVENTORY>                                 12,801,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,305,306
<PP&E>                                      55,515,393
<DEPRECIATION>                              45,025,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,342,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,694,563
<BONDS>                                        226,194
<COMMON>                                    21,497,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,816,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,342,600
<SALES>                                     77,012,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            77,012,461
<CGS>                                       63,503,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,478,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (811,825)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,493
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,485
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,345,925
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,714,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,631,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,631,925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Office of the Secretary


All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers; United 
States City Average

    Pursuant to Section 33105(c) of Title 49, United States Code, and 
the delegation of the Secretary of Transportation's responsibilities 
under that Act to the Administrator of the Federal Highway 
Administration (49 CFR, Section 501.2 (a)(9)), the Secretary of Labor 
has certified to the Administrator and published this notice in the 
Federal Register that the United States City Average All Items Consumer 
Price Index for All Urban Consumers (1967=100) increased 136.0 percent 
from its 1984 annual average of 311.1 to its 2017 annual average of 
734.269.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on May 30, 2018.
R. Alexander Acosta,
Secretary of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2018-12485 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
THE BANKER'S STORE, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Albert Blankenship, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
        the Company.



                                         By: /s/ ALBERT BLANKENSHIP
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Albert Blankenship
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Accounting Officer)


October 21, 2002
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald James EDWARDS.

No. 62275.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Donald James Edwards applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and review and stay order. East Baton Rouge Parish.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy by appeal.
#### Madeline REITZ, Petitioner, v. ATLANTIC NATIONAL BANK, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 30353.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 9, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2







                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                              ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     Enzo J. Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
     to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.














        /s/ Enzo J. Vialardi
        --------------------
       Enzo J. Vialardi
       Chief Financial Officer
       August 15, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00115

- CV

UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD

,

Appellant

v.

Valerie REDUS , Individually, and Robert M. Redus, Individually, and as Administrator of the

Estate of Robert Cameron Redus,

Appellees

From the 150t h Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 07249

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On October 29, 2021, appellees filed an opposed motion for leave to file sur

- reply brief.

Appellees’ motion is GRANTED.

On October 19, 2021, this appeal was submitted on briefs. Appellant has filed a motion to

grant oral argument. The motion is opposed by appellees. After considering the motion and

examining the briefs, appellant’ s request for oral argument is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

39.1(c),(d) (explaining that oral argument is not required if the court, after examining the briefs,

decides that oral argument is unnecessary because “the facts and legal arguments are adequately

presented in the briefs and record” or “the decisional process would not be significantly aided by

oral argument”).

It is so ORDER ED on November 4, 20 21.

PER CURIAMATTESTED TO:

_______________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
Exhibit
10.37  October 19,
2009  THQ
(UK) Limited Ground
Floor, Block A, Dukes Court, Duke Street, Woking, Surrey GU21 5BH  Re:  Limited Update to Provide Hits Tier 2
Threshold Price and Royalty Rate to the European Sales Territory of the Xbox
360 Publisher License Agreement dated October 31, 2005.  Jonathan
Nelson:  Microsoft Licensing, GP (Microsoft)
and THQ (UK) Limited (Publisher) agree to the following terms of this letter (Hits
Tier 2 Terms) in connection with Publishers use and distribution of the Xbox
360 Software Titles listed below. 
Capitalized terms used in this letter shall have the same meanings
ascribed to them in the Xbox 360 Publisher Agreement referenced below and as
subsequently amended (the PLA).   The
terms of the PLA are incorporated herein by reference.  Solely for the Publishers
Software Titles listed below, for the European Sales Territory Microsoft is
providing a Hits Tier 2 Royalty Tier with a Threshold Price of Up to 14.49
at Royalty Rate of 3.00.  This
letter applies to the following Software Titles:  WWE
Smackdown vs. Raw 2008 Saints
Row Ratatouille Wall-E  This letter is applicable for 90 days from the date
of signature below and will be superseded, upon signature by both parties, by
the forthcoming Amendment to the Xbox 360 Publisher Licensing Agreement (Tier 2 Platinum Hits; Russian Incentive Program; Hits Program
Revisions; Emerging Market Revisions).  Please
acknowledge acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing and returning it
to Microsoft at:  Microsoft Licensing, GP Attn:  Xbox 3rdParty Operations 6100 Neil Road Reno, NV  89511.  We
look forward to working with you.  Sincerely,MICROSOFT
  LICENSING, GP/s/
  Astrid B. FordBy
  (sign)Astrid
  B. FordName
  (Print)Sr.
  Xbox Program ManagerTitle10.19.09Date


AGREED
  TO AND ACCEPTED:THQ
  (UK) LIMITEDBy:
  /s/
  Ian CurranName:
  Ian CurranTitle: EVP Global Publishing
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF THE

                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                             DEL LABORATORIES, INC.


                              --------------------

                         Pursuant to Section 242 of the
                             General Corporation Law

                              --------------------




         THE UNDERSIGNED, Chairman of the Board and Secretary, respectively, of
Del Laboratories, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), hereby certify as follows:

         FIRST: Article SIXTH of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                "SIXTH: The number of directors constituting the Board
         of Directors shall not be less than three nor more than ten.
         The Board of Directors shall be divided into three classes
         in as near as may be equal numbers, one class to be elected
         each year for a term of three years and until the successors
         of such class are duly elected and qualify. The number of
         directors shall be fixed from time to time by the Board of
         Directors, provided that no reduction in the number of
         directors shall cause the termination of service of a
         director before the end of the term for which he or she was
         last elected."


<PAGE>


         SECOND: Article TENTH of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

                   "TENTH: If it should be deemed advisable in the
         judgment of the Board of Directors that the Corporation be
         dissolved, the Board, after the adoption of a resolution to
         that effect by not less than a majority of the number of
         directors then constituting the full Board, at any meeting
         called for that purpose, shall cause notice to be mailed to
         each shareholder entitled to vote thereon of the adoption of
         the resolution and of a meeting of stockholders to take
         action upon such resolution. At such meeting of
         stockholders, the affirmative vote of not less than 80% of
         the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the
         Corporation shall be required to authorize such
         dissolution."

         THIRD: The foregoing amendments have been duly adopted in accordance
with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate this
3rd day of June, 1996.




                                             /s/ Dan K. Wassong
                                             ------------------------
                                             Dan K. Wassong
                                             Chairman of the Board

Attest:

/s/ Robert H. Haines
--------------------------
Robert H. Haines
Secretary

                                      - 2 -