alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT32.2

** **

FIRSTHARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First HartfordCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I Stuart I. Greenwald, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

-  
The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

-  
The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ Stuart I. Greenwald

Stuart I. Greenwald

Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer

 

Date:  March 31, 2011
----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:                  November 9, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/                  Vincent L. Kasch    |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   |   | Vincent                  L. Kasch        |
|                                          |   |   | Chief                  Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 10.15

 

Power of Attorney

 

THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY (hereinafter, the “Power of Attorney”) is executed by Weijie MA (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) as of December 5, 2011 and issued to Xin ZHOU (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) (hereinafter, the “Entrusted Person”).

 

I, Weijie MA, hereby entrust the Entrusted Person with full representative power to exercise the following rights owned by me in the capacity of a shareholder of Shanghai Yi Xin E-Commerce Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “Company”) on my behalf:

 

(1)              As my representative, to propose to convene and attend shareholders’ meetings of the Company according to the articles of association of the Company;

 

(2)              As my representative, to exercise, on my behalf, voting rights on all matters requiring discussion or resolutions of the shareholders’ meetings of the Company, including without limitation, the appointment and election of the Company’s directors and other officers, who should be appointed and removed by the shareholders;

 

(3)              As my representative, to exercise other voting rights of a shareholder as specified in the articles of association of the Company (including any other shareholder voting rights as specified in the amended articles of association).

 

I hereby irrevocably confirm that this Power of Attorney shall continue to be valid until the Shareholder Voting Right Proxy Agreement executed by and between Shanghai Yi Yue Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “WFOE”), the Company and the shareholders of the Company as of December 5, 2011 expires or is early terminated, unless the WFOE gives me a direction to replace the Entrusted Person.

 

Authorization is hereby made.

 

	
 
    	
Name: Weijie MA
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/ Weijie MA
    
	
 
    	
Date: December 5, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                               1,773
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      278,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                        96,000
<INVENTORY>                                        136,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   484,164
<PP&E>                                          20,501,239
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,533,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,782,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,512,015
<BONDS>                                         27,365,850
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,254,089
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,177,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,782,047
<SALES>                                            148,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,166,471
<CGS>                                               25,356
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      126,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,504,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,041,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (489,593)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (489,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (489,593)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.16)



</TABLE>
----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:                  May 31, 2007 | By:    | /s/                  William Prouty                    |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |   | William                  Prouty                        |
|                                      |   | President                  and Chief Executive Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,659
<SECURITIES>                                    39,383
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,559
<PP&E>                                       2,345,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 615,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,825,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,439
<BONDS>                                        974,027
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     507,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,825,766
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               217,592
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             68,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    68,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.27
        


</TABLE>
Bryan Regan Photography 

400 E. Martin St. 

Raleigh,NC 27601 

919-829-0960 

Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal 

Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);14 CFR Part 21;14 CFR 61.113 (a) 

& (b); 91.7 (a);91.9 (b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109;91.119; 91.121 ; 91.151(a);91.203(a) 

& (b);91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b). 

I'm requesting to operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial 

photography and videography for advertising and marketing, site inspections, surveys, 

and landscapes. 

I've been a commercial/advertising photographer for over 25 years and have 

been using DJI Phantom drones for the past 2 years for recreational purposes. 

Recently clients have been asking about aerial images and footage for marketing 

and advertising purposes. 

The requested exemption would permit Bryan Regan to pursue his commercial interests 

in providing services to clients using a DJI Phantom (sUAV). 

All flights will occur in ordinance with any state or local laws. I only fly with line of 

site and below 400 feet in a controled area. 

Please consider my request 

thank you 

Bryan Regan 

Small UAS Certificate of Registration 

CERTIFICATE HOLDER: Andrew Regan 

UAS CERTIFICATE NUMBER: FA3PF3FCYP 

ISSUED: 12/28/2015 EXPIRES: 12/28/2018
FTC’s Proposed Partial Stipulated Order for 

Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment

Attachment 1C

Part 4 of 4

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 2 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 3 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 4 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 5 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 6 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 7 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 8 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 9 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 10 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 11 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 12 of 13
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-6 Filed 06/28/16 Page 13 of 13
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 8, 2016
No. 04

- 15

- 00644

- CV
Bret RADCLIFFE , Robert Radcliffe, and Mamba Minerals, LLC , Appellant s

v. TIDAL PETROLEUM, INC. ,

Appe llee From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 07

- 00176

- CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On August 24 , 2016, this court withdrew its May 11, 2016 opinion and judgment and substituted a new opinion and judgment

. A motion for rehear ing or en banc reconsideration i s due on September 8, 2016

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1 , 49.5, 49.7 . A motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing i s due on September 23 , 2016

. See id. R. 49.8. On August 31 , 2016 , Appellee moved this court for a twenty

- one
- day extension of time to file a motion for rehearing

. Appellee ’ s motion is GRANTED. See id. Appellee ’ s motion for rehearing is due on September 29 , 2016.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman

Julie Brill

Maureen K. Ohlhausen

Joshua D. Wright

Terrell McSweeny

___________________________________

)

In the Matter of )

)

ECM BioFilms, Inc., )

a corporation, also d/b/a/ ) Docket No. 9358

Enviroplastics International )

____________________________________)

ORDER EXTENDING WORD COUNT LIMITATIONS

On February 24, 2015, the parties filed a Joint Motion for Extension of Word Count 

Limitation, pursuant to Commission Rules 3.52(c)(2) and 3.52(k). The Joint Motion requests a 

2,500-word extension of the limits for opening and answering appeals briefs, for a limit of 

16,500 words each. The parties maintain that in view of the magnitude and technical complexity 

of the record, undue prejudice will result from the existing word limits.

Commission Rule 3.52(k) provides that “[e]xtensions of word count limitations are 

disfavored, and will only be granted where a party can make a strong showing that undue 

prejudice would result from complying with the existing limit.” Under the circumstances 

described by the parties, an extension of the word count limitations is appropriate. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT the parties will be permitted to file opening and answering 

appeals briefs not to exceed 16,500 words in each brief; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the appeals briefs filed in this matter shall in all 

other respects conform to the requirements of Commission Rule 3.52, 16 C.F.R. § 3.52.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

SEAL:

ISSUED: February 25, 2015
UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549


                            FORM 8-K
                         CURRENT REPORT
                Pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)
             of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                          July 21, 1997
        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                   SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
      Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


     Delaware                      0-18048            75-2258519
(State or Other Jurisdiction     (Commission      (IRS Employer
of Incorporation)                File Number)     Identification No.)


1600 Promenade Center, 15th Floor
        Richardson, TX                                   75080
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)               (Zip Code)


                         (972) 690-5888
      (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


                    _________________________
  (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

ITEM 5.   OTHER EVENTS.

     SA Telecommunications, Inc. issued the press release which is
attached as Exhibit 20.1 hereto on July 21, 1997, which press
release is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND
          EXHIBITS.

     (c)  Exhibits.

          Exhibit No.    Document Description

          20.1*          Press Release of SA Telecommunications, Inc.
                         dated July 21, 1997
          
___________
*Filed herewith

                            SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                   SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

DATE:     July 22, 1997            BY:  /s/ J. DAVID DARNELL
                                        -------------------------
                                        J. David Darnell
                                        Vice President-Finance and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>

                          EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.         DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

20.1*               Press Release of SA Telecommunications, Inc.
                    dated July 21, 1997

___________
*Filed herewith
OR\GI. 


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 


FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 


OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 


) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Mc WANE, INC., ) 

a corporation, and ) DOCKET NO. 9351 

) 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., ) 

a limited partnership, ) 

Respondents. ) 

) 

ORDER ON RESPONDENT MCWANE, INC.'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On July 26, 2012, Respondent McWane, Inc. ("McWane") filed an unopposed motion for 

an extension oftime to file a motion for in camera treatment. Under the Scheduling Order in 

this case, the deadline for submitting motions for in camera treatment under Rule 3.45(b) is July 

27,2012. Respondent has requested an order extending the deadline for filing motions for in 

camera treatment to July 31, 2012. 

In support of its motion, Respondent asserts that it is in the process ofreviewing 

confidential materials and identifying those for which it will seek in camera treatment. 

Respondent further states that because ofthe volume ofits confidential materials that have been 

designated and other pretrial deadlines, Respondent needs additional time to prepare its motion 

for in camera treatment. Respondent represents that Complaint Counsel has indicated that it 

does not oppose the requested extension oftime. 

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. It 

is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Respondent to file a motion for in camera treatment 

shall be Tuesday, July 31, 2012. Complaint Counsel's opposition to such motion, if any, shall be 

filed no later than August 9, 2012. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: July 27,2012
#### Haynes Jackson DUNFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-201.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Neis R. Pearson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, ThierryPilenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Form 10-Qfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

 

2.  Theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company as of the dates and for theperiods presented as required by such Report.

 

June 17, 2005

 

 
| /s/ THIERRY  PILENKO     |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Thierry Pilenko          |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Revised 6/30/05

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On [DATE] and [DATE], we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:

DELIVERED:

	COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO.

	APPELLANT

	V.

	APPELLEE

	------------

	FROM THE COURT OF  COUNTYNO. 2-08-423   -        -CV

 - ASSIGNED PANEL D *TL* 1-6-09 FOR $175 NOT PDYoOlLaAnNdDaA WhHiItTeE aAnNdD AlLlL OtThHeErR OcCcCuUpPaAnNtTsS	APPELLANT	

AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS

	V.

Yolanda White and All Other OccupantsGMmMAaACcC MmMoOrRtTgGaAgGeE, LlLLlLCcC, aAsS SsSeErRvViIcCiInNgG AaAgGeEnNtT	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY THE        DISTRICT COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT OF           COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On nOVEMBERNovember 10, 2008 ___________ and __________December 11, 2008, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 75[or $175 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $1275 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court'’s order of Auaugusgust 28, 2007July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d)43.4..

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINIOOT, and AGGARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  January 68, 2009
Order filed December 21, 2011 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-01212-CR

____________

JUAN MANUEL MESTICO-RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1260041

AMENDED ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 

34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibits #71 (DVD) and #72 (DVD).

The clerk of the 174th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the 

original of State's Exhibits #71 (DVD) and #72 (DVD), on or before December 30, 2011. The 

Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver 

it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return 

the original of State's Exhibits #71 (DVD) and #72 (DVD), to the clerk of the 174th District 

Court.

PER CURIAM