alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE *of*Florida ex rel., Esaw JONES, Relator, v. Honorable Ellen J. MORPHONIOS, Criminal Court Judge of the Criminal Court of Record, in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 71-449.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 6, 1972.

On Rehearing Feb. 29, 1972.

Jack J. Taffer and Arden M. Siegen-dorf, Miami, for relator.

Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Milton Robbins, Asst. State’s Atty., for respondent.

Before SWANN, C. J., and HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Relator has filed a suggestion for a writ of prohibition to halt a prosecution under an information charging a violation of § 790.23, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. of having owned or having in his care, custody or control a firearm (pistol). The statute provides:

> “790.23 Felons; possession of firearms unlawful; exception; penalty.—

> “(2) This section shall not apply to a person having been convicted of a felony whose civil rights have been restored or to a person convicted of a felony for antitrust violation, unfair trade practice, restraints of trade, nonsupport of dependents, bigamy, or other similar offense.”

Relator has been heretofore convicted of the felony of attempted breaking and en*43tering of a dwelling with the intent to commit petit larceny. The trial court denied his motion to dismiss the information on the ground that this section of the statute was unconstitutionally vague.

Thereupon, the relator sought the instant extraordinary writ. We issued the rule nisi, the respondent made a return, briefs were filed and oral arguments were heard. After careful consideration of the statute in question and the cases cited,1 we have concluded that the relator is entitled to the issuance of the writ absolute and it is granted.

In full confidence that the trial court will adhere to the decision of this court, we withhold issuance of the formal writ.

1

. Van Cott v. Driver, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 457; Lanzetta v. New Jersey (1939) 306 U.S. 451, 59 S.Ct. 618, 83 L.Ed. 888, 892, 893; see also Aztec Motel, Inc. v. State ex rel. Faircloth, Fla. 1971, 251 So.2d 849.

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

In the initial opinion of this court rendered on January 6, 1972 based upon the authority of the holding in Van Cott v. Driver, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 457, we held that the relator was entitled to the issuance of the writ absolute in prohibition.

While a petition for rehearing was pending before us, the Supreme Court of Florida reversed the decision of the Second District in Driver v. Van Cott, Fla.1971, 257 So.2d 541, holding that the Florida Statute § 790.23, Fla.Stat.1969, F.S.A., was constitutional.

Viewing the instant appeal and petition for rehearing in the light of the holding in Van Cott, we must recede from our original holding and follow the holding enunciated by our Supreme Court in Van Cott.

For the reasons stated, and authority cited, upon rehearing granted (without further oral argument) the rule nisi in prohibition heretofore entered by this court is discharged and the writ of prohibition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 772 

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant religious workers 

to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. KING of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant 

religious workers to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Worker Visa 

5 Reciprocity Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIRING RECIPROCAL IMMIGRATION TREAT7 MENT. 

8 Section 204(a)(1)(G) of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(G)) is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 772 IH

1 ‘‘(iii) Beginning on October 1, 2017, no petition may 

2 be approved for classification of an alien as a special immi3 grant under section 101(a)(27)(C) if the Secretary of 

4 Homeland Security has determined that the country of the 

5 alien’s nationality— 

6 ‘‘(I) is identified as a ‘Country of Particular 

7 Concern’ or a country where religious freedom is of 

8 significant interest in the 2018 International Reli9 gious Freedom Report; or 

10 ‘‘(II) does not extend reciprocal immigration 

11 treatment to nationals of the United States who are 

12 seeking resident status in order to work in a reli13 gious vocation or occupation.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Henry Lee TOOLE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-467.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000037032
<NAME> FIRST VIRGINIA BANKS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         361,370
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               230,969
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,937,039
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,932,972
<LOANS>                                      5,293,235
<ALLOWANCE>                                     61,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,173,587
<DEPOSITS>                                   7,023,439
<SHORT-TERM>                                   195,918
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             85,557
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,867
<COMMON>                                        32,687
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        655
<OTHER-SE>                                     833,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               8,173,587
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                335,016
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               90,404
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                13,468
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               438,888
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             152,113
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,146
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          279,629
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,799
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,759
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                208,998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,298
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     130,298
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    85,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.86
<LOANS-NON>                                     15,206
<LOANS-PAST>                                    10,362
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,448
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,375
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                57,922
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   11,965
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,785
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               61,541
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            61,541
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Gerald Allen STEPHENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 11, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6334

LARRY F. DEAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PAUL KIRBY, Administrator, Northern Regional

Jail and Correctional Facility,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-43-1)

Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry F. Dean, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn

Ellen Warfield, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Dean v. Kirby, No. CA-96-43-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 20,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Tommy Lee MILES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-308.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 16, 1970.

Appeal dismissed.
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUST  FORM 10-Q MARCH 31, 2006

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust ("the
  Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
  L. Ashner, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
  as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material respects, the
financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   | /s/ Michael L. Ashner   | 
|----- | ----------------------- | 
|      |                         | 
|Name: | Michael L. Ashner       | 
|      | Chief Executive Officer | 

May 10, 2006

51

---
1 

### Wiley, Adina

From: Magee, Melanie

Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 8:04 AM

To: Wiley, Adina

Subject: FW: Selection of GHG PSD Permitting Authority

From: Greg Haunschild [mailto:greg.haunschild@acsengineering.com]

Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 7:22 AM

To: Stenger, Wren

Cc: Magee, Melanie; Craig Chandler; Adam Jackson

Subject: Selection of GHG PSD Permitting Authority

Wren:

On behalf of Powersite, I am contacting you to request that the EPA transfer the GHG PSD permit application for the

Power Generation Facility in Karnes County and all relevant materials to the TCEQ.

If you have any questions related to this request, please contact me by responding to this email or you may reach me on

my mobile phone today at 832

‐ 483

‐ 0509. Thank you.



### Greg Haunschild, PE

Principal Engineer



### ACS Engineering Group

16225 Park Ten Place, Suite 110

Houston, TX 77084

Direct 281.945.1902

Office 281.945.1922

greg.haunschild@acsengineering.com

www.acsengineering.com
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7747 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress an annual 

report on the Solid Start program of the Department of Veterans Affairs, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2020 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois (for herself and Mr. MAST) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to 

Congress an annual report on the Solid Start program 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORTING ON SOLID START PROGRAM OF DE4 PARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 (a) REPORTS REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and annually 

7 thereafter, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit 

8 to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7747 IH

1 House of Representatives a report on the Solid Start pro2 gram of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a) 

4 shall include the following: 

5 (1) With respect to each veteran called or 

6 emailed under the Solid Start program: 

7 (A) The Armed Force of the veteran. 

8 (B) Age. 

9 (C) Gender. 

10 (D) Whether the veteran responded to the 

11 call or email. 

12 (E) Whether the call or email resulted in 

13 a call to the Veterans Crisis Line established 

14 pursuant to section 1720F(h) of title 38, 

15 United States Code. 

16 (F) Whether the call or email resulted in 

17 a referral to— 

18 (i) compensation and pension deter19 mination; 

20 (ii) enrollment in the patient enroll21 ment system of the Department; or 

22 (iii) any other program or benefit 

23 under the laws administered by the Sec24 retary. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7747 IH

1 (2) Any change to the Solid Start program im2 plemented by the Secretary since the date of the pre3 vious such report. 

4 (c) PROHIBITION ON PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE IN5 FORMATION.—No report under subsection (a) may contain 

6 any personally identifiable information regarding a vet7 eran. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Yi He, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Forlink Software Corporation, Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  March 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Yi HeYi HeChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>                         
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                               35,046
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       189,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                         52,200
<INVENTORY>                                       6,575,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    172,664
<PP&E>                                            6,193,441
<DEPRECIATION>                                      914,592
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14,024,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,406,403
<BONDS>                                          15,858,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                          1,254,089
<OTHER-SE>                                       (7,695,503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     14,024,819
<SALES>                                             376,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,462,009
<CGS>                                               373,595
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       142,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,219,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  284,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (273,043)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (273,043)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (273,043)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.09)
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      306
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   896
<PP&E>                                          27,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,016
<SALES>                                          1,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,169
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,261)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,261)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sven Ruder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 24, 2009

/s/ SVEN RUDER Sven Ruder President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks