alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)November 15, 2012(Date of earliest event reported)November 12, 2012





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn November 12, 2012, we announced our participation in the RBC Capital Markets Master Limited Partnership Conference on Thursday, November 15, 2012, and Friday, November 16, 2012, in Dallas, Texas.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on the ONEOK Partners website,www.oneokpartners.com.  A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days.  The presentation materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on our website on November 15, 2012.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and ExhibitsExhibits99.1    News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated November 12, 2012.








2








---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:November 15, 2012By:/s/ Robert F. MartinovichRobert F. MartinovichExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer








3
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 21**  **12**

LAVERN R. CR U MP , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (MCEA); MARYLAND STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION (MSEA) , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paul W. Grimm , District Judge. ( 8 :1 4

- cv - 0 0229

- PWG )

Submitted : January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lavern R. Crump , Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Elliot Rockman, SEROTTE, ROCKMAN & WESCOTT, PA, Baltimore , Maryland , for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM :
Lavern R. Crump appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing her civil action asserting wrongful termination and
bre a ch of the duty of fair representation . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crump v. Montgomery Cnty. Educ. Association , No. 8:14

- cv - 00229

- PWG (D. Md. Sept. 23,
2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-Q of Falcon Products, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ending August 3, 2002, I, Michael J. Dreller, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended August 3, 2002,
          fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Act of 1934: and

     (2)  the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the
          period ended August 3, 2002, fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.


Date: September 4, 2002                   /s/  Michael J. Dreller
                                          -----------------------
                                          Michael J. Dreller
                                          Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.24  SONY
COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC.  LATIN AMERICA RIDER TO THE GLOBAL PLAYSTATION3 FORMAT
LICENSED PUBLISHER AGREEMENT  This Latin America Rider to the
Global PlayStation®3 Format Licensed Publisher Agreement(the Rider)
is entered into by THQ, Inc. (Publisher) and Sony Computer Entertainment
America Inc. (SCEA) and rendered effective as of this 12thday of
December, 2008 (the Effective Date).  1.             Incorporation  The Riders terms and conditions are incorporated into
and read in conjunction with the terms and conditions of the Global PlayStation
3 Format Licensed Publishers Agreement Signed by Publisher (PS3 LPA) along
with any and all other riders to the PS3 GLPA executed between Publisher and
SCEA.  2.             Definitions  All capitalized words and phrases referenced in the
Rider that are not expressly defined herein shall have the meanings set forth
in the Definitions section of the PS3 LPA.  3.             Territory  A.            Pursuant
to this Rider, the Territory for the PS3 LPA shall now consist of the following
geographic areas:  (1)           North
America (including all territories and possessions of the United States);  (2)           Central
America; and  (3)           South
America.  B.            SCEA
can modify and amend the Territory from time and time during the Term by
providing written notice of any such changes to Publisher.  In the event that a specific country is
deleted from the Territory, SCEA shall deliver to Publisher a written notice
stating the number of days within which Publisher must cease distributing
Licensed Products and must retrieve any Development Tools located in that
deleted country.  C.            Publisher
shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit orders for or sell any Units of Disc
Products in any situation where Publisher knows or reasonably should know that
any of such Disc Products may be exported or resold outside of the Territory.  4.             Payment
Logistics  All payments to be made to SCEA pursuant to the terms
and conditions of the PS3 LPA and any rider shall be made to SCEA either: 1)
directly from Publisher in the event that Publisher is domiciled in the United
States, or 2) indirectly from a United States-domiciled affiliate, associate,
branch office, or subsidiary of Publisher (Designee) in the event that
Publisher is domiciled in a location in the Territory other that the United
States. It is the sole responsibility and cost of the Publisher to establish
its Designee.


5.             Governing
Law  This Rider shall be governed by and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, excluding that body of law
related to choice of laws, and of the United States of America.  6.             Conflict
Resolution  In the event that any of the terms and conditions of
this Rider shall conflict with any terms and conditions of the PS3 LPA or any
other rider previously entered into by the parties, the terms of this Rider
shall prevail.   ACCEPTED AND AGREED:  Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc.
  
  THQ, Inc.By:
  
  
  By:Name:
  
  Name:Title:
  
  Title:Date:
  
  Date:
# Službeni list C 257E/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1088
  doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.257.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 257E |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | 566 rujna 2013. |

ISSN 1977-1088

doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.257.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 257E

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

566 rujna 2013.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | REZOLUCIJE |
| | Europski parlament |
| 2013/C 257E/01 | Obavijest za čitatelje | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

REZOLUCIJE

Europski parlament

2013/C 257E/01

Obavijest za čitatelje

1

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

REZOLUCIJE

Europski parlament

| 6.9.2013 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CE 257/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2013

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CE 257/1

---

OBAVIJEST ZA ČITATELJE

Rezolucije Europskog parlamenta objavljene u drugim jezičnim verzijama u ovom izdanju Službenog lista usvojene su prije pristupanja Hrvatske Europskoj uniji te stoga nisu prevedene na hrvatski.

---
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7834 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to small company capital 

formation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2020 

Mr. HOLLINGSWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to small 

company capital formation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulation A+ Im5 provement Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JOBS ACT-RELATED EXEMPTION. 

7 Section 3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 

8 77c(b)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking 

10 ‘‘$50,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000,000, adVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:25 Aug 17, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7834.IH H7834

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7834 IH

1 justed for inflation by the Commission every 2 years 

2 to the nearest $10,000 to reflect the change in the 

3 Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers 

4 published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics’’; and 

5 (2) in paragraph (5)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘such amount as’’ and in7 serting: ‘‘such amount, in addition to the ad8 justment for inflation provided for under such 

9 paragraph (2)(A), as’’; and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘such amount, it’’ and in11 serting ‘‘such amount, in addition to the adjust12 ment for inflation provided for under such 

13 paragraph (2)(A), it’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 8

- 00 388

- C R



### ____________________

BELTER RONALDO ARENAS

- PERALTA

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 18

- 08

- 10910

- CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 19 , 20 18 , the trial co urt sentenced Belter Ronaldo Arenas

Peralta on a conviction for aggravated robbery

. O n October 8, 2018, Arenas

- Peralta

filed a notice of appeal. The trial court ’s certification reflects that the case is a plea

bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

25.2(a)(2). The district clerk provided this Court with the trial court’s certification

,

which shows Arenas

- Peralta has no right to appeal. On October 9 , 2018 , we notified

the parties that we would dismiss the appeal unless Arenas

- Peralta established2 grounds for continuing his appeal. He did not respond to our request . Because the

trial court’s certification shows that Arenas

- Peralta does not have the right of appeal,

we must dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is

dismissed

.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on November 13, 2018

Opinion Delivered November 14, 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
#### COLLEGE INVESTMENT CO., Inc., Appellant, v. DEPOSIT GUARANTY NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 46207.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 1971.

Stennett, Wilkinson & Ward, Jackson, Harold Noe, Bourdeaux & Jones, Meridian, for appellant.

Rabb & Corrigan, Meridian, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### James Charles PAYNE, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE et al., Respondents.

Nos. 44423, 44424.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 25, 1974.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-30655, 333-74715, 333-78567, 333-62502, 333-90986, 333-91002, 333-117334, 333-137396, 333-153659, and 333-162130 on Form S-8 of our reports dated Ju ne 6, 20 11 relating to the consolidated financial statements of THQ Inc. and its subsidiaries (the "Company") and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. for the year ended April 2, 2011 .


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Los Angeles, California


June 6, 2011
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy Lee VALENTINE.

No. 60459.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Roy Lee Valentine applying for writ of review.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

*899It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Monty M. Wyche, Judge of the 26th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Webster, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 4th day of November, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
SERVED: October 31, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS DEPARTMENT OF 

In The Matter Of: 

FELTS FIELD AVIATION 

Respondent 

WASHINGTON DC TRANSPORTATION 

' 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ZOib OCT 32 A q: 31 

DOCKET OPERATIONS· 

Docket No. FAA-2015-3307 

Case No. 2015WP910090 

ORDER SETTING MOTION CONFERENCE 

On August 2, 2016, an Order Denying Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and for an Award 

of Attorney Fees was filed. 

On September 16, 2016, the Respondent, Felts Field Aviation, filed the Respondent's 

Motion to Compel. 

On September 22, 2016, the FAA filed the Complainant's Opposition to Respondent's 

Motion to Compel. 

On September 30, 2016, the Respondent filed the Respondent's Reply to Complainant's 

Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Compel. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205, and having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and 

motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The parties shall appear by telephone on Thursday, November 10,2016, at 1:30 p.m. 

Eastern time for a Motion Conference. The parties shall be prepared to present oral 

argument on, and answer questions regarding, the September 16, 2016 Respondent's 

Motion to Compel. The parties shall access the Conference by dialing 888-278-0296, and 

when prompted, entering access code 5851842. 
2. If either party needs clarification or has any questions regarding the procedures contained 

in this Order, contact Ms. Rachael Brown, Judicial Staff Assistant, at the Office of 

Hearings (202-366-2132). 

van 

~m1:1· listrative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 

Page 2 of2 
Docket No. FAA-2015-3307 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Ms. Fatimah Stokley 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division- Western Team 

P.O. Box 920007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7112 

FPC(: 310-725-6816 

Mr. Mark J. Conlin 

Mr. Benjamin L. Wybomey 

Respondent's Counsel 

Conlin, Maloney & Miller 

421 W. Riverside Ave., Suite 911 

Spokane, W A 99201 

TEL: 509-624-3020 

FPC(: 509-623-1650 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Felts Field Aviation, Inc. 

Respondent 

14 East Main Ave. 

Spokane, WA 99201-0405 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. BENJAMIN A. GIBBS, a/k/a Hev, a/k/a Bubba , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. ( 9:98

- cr - 00322

- PMD

- 2; 9:16

- cv - 01484

- PMD )

Submitted : May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Benjamin A. Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Emily Evans Limehouse, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Dean Hodge Secor, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, f or Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin A. Gibbs seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit ju stice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the distri ct court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (200 0); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim o f the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibbs has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Frankie MORRISON v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 61139.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Frankie Morrison applying for writ of mandamus. Orleans Parish.

Denied.
#### John David GLASS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 4, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Robert C. Parker, Jr., Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON, and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3657]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018-AD69


Migratory Bird Hunting; Late Seasons and Bag and Possession 
Limits for Certain Migratory Game Birds; Supplemental

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final Rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (hereinafter Service) is 
supplementing the rule prescribing the late open season, hunting hours, 
hunting areas, and daily bag and possession limits for general 
waterfowl seasons in South Dakota that appeared in the Federal Register 
on September 27, 1996 (61 FR 50738).

DATE: Effective on February 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul R. Schmidt, Chief, Office of 
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department 
of the Interior, ms 634--ARLSQ, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20240, (703) 358-1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the September 27, 1996, Federal Register 
(61 FR 50738), the Service published a final rule prescribing the late 
open season, hunting hours, hunting areas, and daily bag and possession 
limits for general waterfowl seasons and certain other migratory bird 
seasons in the conterminous United States. Public comment was received 
on the proposed rules for the seasons and limits contemplated herein. 
These comments were addressed in the Federal Registers dated August 29, 
1996, (61 FR 45836) and September 26, 1996 (61 FR 50662). This 
supplement involves no change in substance in the contents of the prior 
proposed and final rules. In the case of South Dakota, the State has 
elected to select the remaining allowable hunt days permitted under the 
existing frameworks for snow geese.

    Dated: February 3, 1997
George T. Frampton, Jr.
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.

PART 20--[AMENDED]

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, title 50, chapter I, 
subchapter B, Part 20, subpart K is amended as follows:
    1. The authority citation for Part 20 continues to read as follows:
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712; and 16 U.S.C. 742 a-j.


Sec. 20.105  [Amended]

    2. In Section 20.105, paragraph (e) is amended by revising the 
Season Dates for South Dakota, subheading Light Geese, to read ``Sept. 
28-Dec. 22 & Feb. 18-Mar. 10.'
[FR Doc. 97-3657 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-F