alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of DirectorsSauer-Danfoss Inc.:

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 33-53927and No. 333-93745 on Form S-8 of Sauer-Danfoss Inc.of our reports dated March 12, 2007 with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related financialstatement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-Kof Sauer-Danfoss Inc.

Our report datedMarch 12, 2007, notes that the Company adopted the provisions of Statementof Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,*on December 31, 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Des Moines, IowaMarch 12, 2007

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8858-8859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4720]



[[Page 8857]]

_______________________________________________________________________

Part III





Office of Management and Budget





_______________________________________________________________________



Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals; Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 8858]]



OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Cumulative Report on Rescissions and Deferrals; February 1, 1997

    This report is submitted in fulfillment of the requirement of 
Section 1014(e) of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act 
of 1974 (Public Law 93-344). Section 1014(e) requires a monthly report 
listing all budget authority for the current fiscal year for which, as 
of the first day of the month, a special message had been transmitted 
to Congress.
    This report gives the status, as of February 1, 1997, of seven 
deferrals contained in the first special message for FY 1997. This 
message was transmitted to Congress on December 4, 1996.

Rescissions

    As of February 1, 1997, no rescission proposals had been 
transmitted to the Congress.

Deferrals (Attachments A and B)

    As of January 1, 1997, $3,486 million in budget authority was being 
deferred from obligation. Attachment B shows the status of each 
deferral reported during FY 1997.

Information From Special Messages

    The special message containing information on the rescission 
proposals and deferrals that are covered by this cumulative report is 
printed in the editions of the Federal Register cited below:

61 FR 66172, Monday, December 16, 1996
Franklin D. Raines,
Director.

Attachments

               Attachment A.--Status of FY 1997 Deferrals               
                        [In millions of dollars]                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Budgetary  
                                                             resources  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferrals proposed by the President.....................         3,544.3
Routine Executive releases through January 1, 1997 (OMB/                
 Agency releases of $58.3 million.).....................           -58.3
                                                         ---------------
Overturned by the Congress..............................                
    Currently before the Congress.......................         3,486.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------


BILLING CODE 3110-01-P

[[Page 8859]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26FE97.015



[FR Doc. 97-4720 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-C
#### Gaston LEVESQUE et al. v. Milton R. SABA.

No. 61169.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 8, 1977.

In re: Milton R. Saba applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Application denied; no abuse of discretion shown.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1327-1328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Office of Educational Research and Improvement; Notice of 
Proposed Information Collection Requests for Combined Application for 
the OERI Visiting Scholars Fellowship Program

AGENCY: Department of Education.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 4, 1996, a notice of proposed information 
collection for the Combined Application

[[Page 1328]]

for the OERI Visiting Scholars Fellowship Program was published in the 
Federal Register at 61 FR 64343 which solicited public comments for a 
60 day period through February 3, 1997. Policymakers and librarians 
were not included in the abstract for this program. The abstract is 
corrected as the following: ``The OERI Visiting Scholars Fellowship 
provides support to senior scholars, researchers, policymakers, 
education practitioners, librarians, and statisticians to engage in the 
use, collection, and dissemination of information about education and 
education research to work at OERI in Washington, DC. The information 
collected in the application will be used to determine who is selected 
for these fellowships.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Sherrill, U.S. Department of 
Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20202-4651. 
Telephone: (202) 708-8196. Individuals who use a telecommunications 
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay 
Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 
time, Monday through Friday.

    Dated: January 3, 1997.
Gloria Parker,
Director for Information Resources Group.
[FR Doc. 97-453 Filed 1-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
*** YOUR FILE IS CURRENTLY ON HOLD *** 

Account Number: STLNAS 

(866) 238-8210 

•h I I•' I 1•1• 11 llh • 111 • I •I• 11 t1 I nl11IIII'111 11111' 11 '11111 •I• JI I 

Dear Beverly, 

There was an issue in drafting your monthly payment. In order to get your file back on track you 

are required to resolve this matter immediately. 

Call us TODAY at (866) 238-8210, Monday through Friday from 8 am to S pm PST, and a 

Customer Ser vjce Representative will help you. 

We value you as a client and look forward to serving your needs. 

*** Dont riskfallin9 behind on your payments to our company 

for the services you asked us to perform - ACT NOW*** 

Warm Regards, 

Your Ameritech Financial Team! 

... U01- J.n-vestmentBlvd,Su.~98·--· 

El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 

(866) 238-8210 -Toll Free 

1-866-818-9026 " Fax 

Account Number: STLN~ 

Case 4:18-cv-00806 Document 1-9 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 1 

Complaint Exhibit I
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rohit Chopra

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson

DOCKET NO. 9391

SECOND ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

IN LIGHT OF PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

By order dated March 19, 2020, the Commission has already stayed this proceeding and 

deferred the commencement of the evidentiary hearing by 30 days. Because of the declared 

public health emergency1 associated with the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 

(“COVID-19”), also known as SARS-CoV-2; and because it has been advised that gatherings of 

ten or more persons may facilitate the spread of the disease, the Commission has determined that 

it is in the public interest to mitigate the transmission and impact of COVID-19, and that good 

cause exists to stay this proceeding for an additional 45 days and to again reschedule the 

evidentiary hearing. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this proceeding be fully stayed, except for matters of 

settlement, for an additional 45 calendar days; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the evidentiary hearing date and all pre-hearing 

deadlines in this proceeding be further extended by the number of calendar days of this 

additional stay. The Administrative Law Judge retains discretion to adjust any such pre-hearing 

deadlines to the extent compatible with the hearing date as extended by this Order or to make a 

recommendation to the Commission regarding an alternative hearing date.

By the Commission.

April J. Tabor 

Acting Secretary

SEAL:

ISSUED:April 13, 2020

1 Pursuant to the Public Health Services Act, 42 U.S.C. 247d, on January 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Department of 

Health and Human Services issued a declaration that a health emergency exists because of COVID-19; and on March

13, 2020, the President of the United States issued a proclamation that a national emergency exists concerning COVID19. Remarks by President Trump, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks- presidenttrump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-conference-3/ (Mar. 13, 2020).

In the Matter of

Peabody Energy Corporation, 

a public company, 

and 

Arch Coal, Inc.,

a public company.
1 Filed 1/15/15 P. v. Washington CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. WESLEY WASHINGTON, Defendant and Appellant. C074733 (Super. Ct. No. 95F06373)

Defendant Wesley Washin gton appeals from an orde r denying a petition to recall
his so-called “three strikes” sentence of 25 years to life, brou ght pursuant to the provisions of the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (the Act), codified at Penal Code
section 1170.126. 1 (See Teal v. Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595.) Defendant’s petition to recall his senten ce and for resentencing was denied upon determination that he was not eligible fo r relief under the Act because he had been

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.2 previously convicted of kidnappi ng with force and intent to commit sex offenses as listed
in Welfare and Institutions Code sec tion 6600, subdivision (b) (see §§ 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iv)(I), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(C)(iv)(I), 1170.126, subd. (e)(3)) and because he was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commitment offense (see §§ 667, subd. (e)(2)(C)(iii), 1170.12, subd. (c )(2)(C)(iii), 1170.126, subd. (e)(2)). Counsel was appointed to represent de fendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the
record and determine whether there ar e any arguable issues on appeal. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defe ndant of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed,
and we received no communica tion from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable e rror that would result in a disposition more
favorable to defendant. 2
DISPOSITION The judgment (order) is affirmed.

RAYE , P. J.

We concur:

BLEASE , J.

NICHOLSON , J.

2 A record including the appellate record of People v. Washington (Jan. 26, 2000, C029961) [nonpub. opn.], which we ha ve incorporated by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7455 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7455

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the 
 Secretary of Health and Human Services to make adjustments to payment 
  rates for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare program to 
               account for certain unique circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2020

   Ms. Gabbard (for herself, Mr. Young, and Mr. Case) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the 
 Secretary of Health and Human Services to make adjustments to payment 
  rates for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare program to 
               account for certain unique circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equitable Payments for Nursing 
Facilities Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES TO MAKE 
              ADJUSTMENTS TO PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING 
              FACILITIES UNDER THE MEDICARE PROGRAM TO ACCOUNT FOR 
              CERTAIN UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES.

    Section 1888(e)(4)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395yy(e)(4)(G)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
                            ``(iv) Adjustment for unique 
                        circumstances.--The Secretary may provide for 
                        such adjustments as determined appropriate by 
                        the Secretary to take into account the unique 
                        circumstances of skilled nursing facilities 
                        located in Alaska or Hawaii.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 10700.

#### Monroe, admx., *v.*The City of Cleveland et al.

Decided June 2, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. William Hovuell*and *Messrs. Deutsch, Howells & 'Grossman,*for plaintiff in *error.*

*Mr. Newton D. Baker,*city solicitor, and *Messrs. Wilcox, Wilkin, Carey & Stevens,*for defendants in error.

Judgment of circuit court reversed and judgment for plaintiff in' error.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### George SENTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-617.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1971.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was found guilty of murder in the second degree after a trial be*466fore the court without jury. On this appeal he urges the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the judgment and, in particular, he urges that the record does not contain any evidence to show “a depraved mind regardless of human life”. F.S. 782.-04, par. 2, F.S.A.

We have reviewed the record and find the evidence of guilt to be clear and convincing. The evidence of depraved mind is sufficient under the standard set in Ramsey v. State, 114 Fla. 766, 154 So. 855 (1934).

Affirmed.
Sh inberg, Samuel I.

From: Sheinberg, Samuel |.

Sent: Thursday, April 15,2021 1:43 PM

To:

Ce:

Subject: RE: Query regarding 802.51(b)(1) Exemption

In your fact pattern, control is determined by the percentage of voting securities that is held.

Sam

& Canada)

Dear all,

We are writing to confirm whether “including all entities controlled by the issuer” in the 16 C.F.R. § 802.51(b)(1)
exemption includes entities controlled by virtue of Board appointment rights. We understand from prior guidance from
the PNO that to “confer control” in the same provision means that control must be conferred by the acquisition of 50%
or more of voting securities, and not the right to appoint 50% or more of the Board. See, e.g., Premerger Notification
Practice Manual (5th Ed.) Interpretation 161; Informal Interpretation #050323 (June 30, 2010)
(https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/premerger-notification-program/informal-interpretations/0503023). The language
of 802.51(b)(1) is reproduced below for ease of reference:

The acquisition of voting securities of a foreign issuer by a foreign person shall be exempt from the requirements of the
act unless the acquisition will confer control of the issuer and the issuer (including all entities controlled by the issuer)
either: holds assets located in the United States (other than investment assets, voting or nonvoting securities of another
person, and assets included pursuant to § 801.40(d)(2) of this chapter) having an aggregate total value of over $50
million (as adjusted); or made aggregate sales in or into the United States of over $50 million (as adjusted) in its most
recent fiscal year.”

In this instance, we have a foreign acquirer A acquiring 95% of the shares of acquired entity B. B’s U.S. sales are minimal
and it has no U.S. assets, but holds a 45% minority stake in U.S. entity C. However, B has the right to designate 50% of
the Board of Directors of C. Please advise whether C would be considered an “entit[y] controlled by the issuer” for
purposes of applying this exemption.


| |
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-136116) of Adept Technology, Inc.;
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-112360) of Adept Technology, Inc.;
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-130235) pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan of Adept Technology, Inc.;
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-138863 and Form S-8 No. 333-122155) pertaining to the 2004 Director Stock Option Plan of Adept Technology, Inc.;
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(5) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-122148 and Form S-8 No. 333-112213) pertaining to the 2003 Stock Option Plan, as amended, of Adept Technology, Inc.;
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(6) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-71374) pertaining to the 2001 Stock Option Plan of Adept Technology, Inc.;
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(7) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-66993 and Form S-8 No. 333-50292) pertaining to the 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Adept Technology, Inc.;
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(8) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-03656) pertaining to the 1995 Director Stock Option Plan, as amended, of Adept Technology, Inc.; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(9) | Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-92525, Form S-8 No. 333-39065, and Form S-8 No. 333-50296) pertaining to the 1993 Stock Plan of Adept Technology, Inc.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated August 19, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Adept Technology, Inc. for
the year ended June 30, 2005, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California

September 12, 2007
**Exhibit10.1**

**SUMMARYOF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS OF KENNETH T. SMITH**

As aresult of his promotion to the position of Chief Financial Officer effectiveApril 16, 2007 (as further described in the Company’s report on Form 8-K filedon April 16, 2007), Mr. Smith’s annual salary is $250,000 per year.  His target bonus percentage is 40% of hisannual base salary.  Additionally, Mr.Smith received (i) 3,793 stock options; (ii) 1,154 performance share rightsawards (“PSRs”) for the fiscal years 2007-2009 performance period; (iii) 545PSRs for the fiscal years 2006-2008 performance period; and (iv) 161 PSRs forthe fiscal 2007 performance period. These stock option and PSR awards are in recognition of his promotionand are in addition to equity grants previously made to Mr. Smith in his priorposition with the Company.

Theforegoing does not constitute a complete summary of the compensation providedto Mr. Smith in connection with his promotion to Chief Financial Officer.  Reference is made to the following Companyplans:  (i) Family Dollar Stores, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan (filed asExhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 25, 2006);(ii) Family Dollar Stores, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan *2006Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant Program* (filed as Exhibit 10.3 tothe Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 25, 2006); (iii) FamilyDollar Stores, Inc. 2006 Incentive Plan *Guidelines for Long-TermIncentive Performance Share Rights Awards* (filed as Exhibit 10.4 tothe Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on April 12, 2007); and (iv) theCash Bonus Award Guidelines (filed as Exhibit 10 to the Company’s Form 8-Kfiled with the SEC on October 6, 2006), for more information regarding Mr.Smith’s compensation as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company.

 

----