alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUST  
FORM 10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop  Realty Trust (the
Company) for the nine months  ended  September  30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I,
Michael L.  Ashner,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted,  pursuant  to  section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition and  results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   | /s/ Michael L. Ashner                      | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|      |                                            | 
|Name: | Michael L. Ashner 
Chief Executive Officer | 

October 27, 2006

68
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EURO NUT AUTO REPAIR, LLC

, Appellant,

v.

GARY WILLIAMS
, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 023

- 2538

[ July 10, 2024 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Nicole P. Menz , Judge ; L.T. Case No.

312023SC000753

.

Ryan Scott DiGiovanni of Ryan Scott DiGiovanni, PLLC, Vero Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Bunting v. Daly’s, Inc. , 528 So. 2d 106 , 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (rejecting the argument that under section 319.22(1), Florida Statutes (198 5 ), a plaintiff did not have standing or a cause of action for conversion because he did not hold a title certificate in his name, because that statute only aff ects the marketability of title ); Williams Mgmt. Enters

. , Inc. v. Buonauro , 489 So. 2d 160, 164 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (“[R]eplevin is strictly a possessory action where the sole legal issue is the right of immediate possession, not ownership or title.”) ; Sou thside Atl. Bank v.

Lewis , 174 So. 2d 470, 471 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965) (“The only issue to be determined in a replevin action is the right of possession. The question of title is secondary and unimportant where title and the right to immediate possession have been separated.”)

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

                                (KELLY W. GEORGE)

      This First Amendment (the "Amendment"), dated as of the 12th day of
January, 2005, by and among MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION (f/k/a NORTH COUNTRY
FINANCIAL CORPORATION), a Michigan corporation (the "Company"), and KELLY W.
GEORGE ("Employee").

                                   WITNESSETH:

      WHEREAS, the Company and Employee are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement dated December 14, 2004 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

      WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement, on the
terms and conditions set forth herein.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
undertakings set forth herein the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1. The first sentence of Section 10 of the Employment Agreement captioned
"Stock Options" is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

                  On or within one (1) year after the Effective Date, Employee
            shall be awarded options to purchase 20,000 shares (adjusted for a 1
            for 20 reverse stock split to be effective on the Effective Date) of
            the Company's Common Stock under the Company's 2000 Stock Incentive
            Plan (the "Plan") on such terms and conditions specified in an
            appropriate stock option agreement (the "Option Agreement") and the
            Plan.

<PAGE>

      2. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning
ascribed to such term in the Employment Agreement.

      3. In the event there is a conflict between the terms of the Employment
Agreement and the terms of this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall
control.

      4. The Employment Agreement, as hereby amended, shall continue in full
force and effect, to the fullest extent not inconsistent with this Amendment.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the
date first above written.

                                   MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                                   By /s/ Paul D. Tobias
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Paul D. Tobias
                                      Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

                                   /s/ Kelly W. George
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   Kelly W. George

                                       -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             637
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      283
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   967
<PP&E>                                          27,493
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              255
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,343
<SALES>                                            676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (944)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (944)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,. Jesper V. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 4, 2010

/s/ JESPER V. CHRISTENSEN Jesper V. Christensen Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, including consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.                    

*Date:*                         July 15-17, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         6:00 p.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate personal qualifications and performance, and competence of individual investigators.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alan P. Koretsky, Ph.D., Scientific Director, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, 35 Convent Drive, Room 6A 908, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-2232,                         *koretskya@ninds.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: June 4, 2018.

Sylvia L. Neal,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-12396 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

LaBelle Management, Inc. v Michigan Department of Treasury 

Docket o . 324062 

LC No. 13-000095-MT 

Henry William Saad 

Presiding Judge 

Ku11is T. Wilder 

Christopher M. Murray 

Judges 

The Court orders that the 03/3l/2016 opm1on is hereby AMENDED. The opm1on 

contained the following clerical error: the word " issue" was omitted after the word "dispositive" in the 

first sentence of the last paragraph on page 3. The sentence should now read: 

There is no dispute that the dispositive issue here is what is meant by the phrase "owns or 

controls, directly or indirectly.'' 

In all other respects. the 03/31/20 16 opinion remains unchanged. 

A tn1e copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr. , Chief Clerk. on 

APR 0 5 2016 

Date ~.ii~. chie 1c!k
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7965 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7965

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 7, 2020

 Mr. Foster (for himself and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ``LARRY'' WALSH SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lawrence M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence 
M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Raymond W. MANDEL et ux., Appellants, v. Robert D. MORGAN et al., Appellees.

No. 72-364.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 7, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 10.14





EXHIBIT 10.14

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

 

SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

 

 

THIS AMENDMENT NO.1 TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is an amendment to that certain Secured Promissory Note dated August 30, 2013 (“Note”) issued by AIRPATROL CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation having an address at 9861 Broken Land Parkway, Suite 204, Columbia, MD 21046 (“Borrower”) to the order of SYSOREX GLOBAL HOLDINGS CORP., a Nevada corporation (“Lender”), in lawful money of the United States of America immediately available funds, in the principal sum of One Million and 00/100 ($1,000,000.00) Dollars, or such other amount as may from time to time be the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans thereunder (the “Loan”). 

 

 

RECITALS

 

	 	
A.
	
Reference is made to: (i) the Loan Agreement dated August 30, 2013 by and between the Lender and Borrower (“Loan Agreement”), (ii) the Note, (iii) the Security Agreement dated August 30, 2013 by and between the Lender and Borrower (“Security Agreement”), and (iv) the Subordination Agreement dated August 30, 2013 by and between the Lender and each of the holders of promissory notes issued by the Borrower identified therein as “Junior Lenders” (“Subordination Agreement”) (the Loan Agreement, Note, Security Agreement and Subordination Agreement, and amendments thereto if any, are collectively referred to as the “Senior Loan Documents”.) 



   

	 	
B.
	
The Loan Agreement and Note provide that the Loan shall mature on “February 30, 2014”. 



  

	 	
C.
	
The Borrower and Lender desire to extend the term of the Loan under the Loan Documents to April 29, 2014, and are entering into this Amendment in order to effect said extension. 



 

 

AGREEMENT

 

	 	
1.
	
The undersigned parties agree that the Note is hereby amended such that the Maturity Date (as set forth and defined in the Note) is April 29, 2014. 



 

	 	
2.
	
The undersigned parties hereby acknowledge that by reason of the foregoing amendment, the preamble of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to reflect a revised due date of April 29, 2014. 



 

 

 

[Signatures Follow]

 


 

1




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.

 

 

	 	
LENDER:
	 	 	
BORROWER:

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
Sysorex Global Holdings Corp.
	 	 	
AirPatrol Corporation

	 	
a Nevada corporation
	 	 	
a Nevada corporation

	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	
 /s/ Nadir Ali
	 	By: 	
/s/ Cleve Adams

	 	 	 	 	 
	Name: 	Nadir Ali	 	Name:	
 Cleve Adams

	 	 	 	 	 
	Its:	
 CEO
	 	Its: 	
CEO



 

 

 

2
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

30606

04-DEC-2013

08:25 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         339,409
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,942,088
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               150,303
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    778,511
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         525,089
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           528,968
<LOANS>                                      5,627,023
<ALLOWANCE>                                    117,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,755,839
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,735,781
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            103,628
<LONG-TERM>                                    115,325<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,675
<OTHER-SE>                                     571,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,755,839
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                564,020
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               50,387
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 9,958
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               624,365
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             228,689
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             242,305
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          382,060
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  119,444
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                347,559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                119,288
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      72,508
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,508
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   216.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   216.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,869
<LOANS-PAST>                                    73,164
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0<F2>
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               128,990
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  159,102
<RECOVERIES>                                    25,063
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              117,826
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 92,963 IN CAPITAL NOTES
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR INTERIM REPORTING PURPOSES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7914 

To specify that no person shall be required to comply with the CECL Rule 

under any Federal statute or regulation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2020 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To specify that no person shall be required to comply with 

the CECL Rule under any Federal statute or regulation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eliminating CECL Ac5 counting Standard Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVING ANY REQUIREMENT TO COMPLY WITH 

7 THE CECL RULE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—No person shall be required to 

9 comply with the CECL Rule under any Federal statute 

10 or regulation. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7914 IH

1 (b) CECL RULE DEFINED.—In this section, the 

2 term ‘‘CECL Rule’’ means the accounting standard con3 tained in the Accounting Standards Update No. 2016–13 

4 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board, titled ‘‘Fi5 nancial Instruments–Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measure6 ment of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments’’ issued 

7 June 2016. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1951

JUAN ORTIZ ALVARADO,

 Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 17, 2020 Decided: March 30, 2020

Before MOTZ, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Lincoln Robertson, Jr., ROBERTSON LAW OFFICE, PLLC, Springfield, Virginia, 

for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Emily Anne Radford, Assistant 

Director, Aric A. Anderson, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Juan Ortiz Alvarado, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of an 

order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the 

Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for withholding of removal and protection 

under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including 

the transcript of Alvarado’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that 

the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual 

findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2018), and that substantial evidence supports the 

Board’s decision, see Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 359 (4th Cir. 2009); Dankam v. 

Gonzales, 495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir. 2007). Further, we find Alvarado’s due process 

claim to be unavailing because he fails to show that the alleged errors impacted the outcome 

of his case. See Anim v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir. 2008); accord Rusu v. INS, 

296 F.3d 316, 320-22 (4th Cir. 2002). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Alvarado (B.I.A. Aug. 13, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED