alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
     FORM 10-Q OF FINANCIAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
     JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           80,851
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                               0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                 0
<EQUITIES>                                          4
<MORTGAGE>                                          0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                100,748
<CASH>                                          1,181
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             16,369
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         54,240
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                294,019
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                61,394
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                14
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 43,527
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           3,734
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                38,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        1,169
<OTHER-SE>                                    118,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  294,019
<PREMIUMS>                                     16,844
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             3,440
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                      3
<BENEFITS>                                      7,221
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     2,443
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            5,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,997
<INCOME-TAX>                                      578
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             4,419
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    4,419
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.86
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), the undersigned Vlado P. Hreljanovic,
Chief Executive Officer of the registrant Juniper Group, Inc. hereby certifies
that:





1. The
Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      May15,  2009
            By:
            /s/Vlado P.
      HreljanovicVlado
      P. Hreljanovic, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
258 La. 367

#### Woodrow THREETON, Individually and as Administrator on Behalf of his Minor Son, Ben W. Threeton v. The PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 51338.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Woodrow Threeton applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 244 So.2d 919.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SFP PIPELINE HOLDINGS, INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,403
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,685
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,940
<BONDS>                                        204,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                    (72,430)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,685
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,989
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANDRA MARGARITA PORTILLOMENDEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-72395

Agency No. A088-016-694

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Sandra Margarita Portillo-Mendez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

FILED

NOV 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-72395

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. §

1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163,

1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s

determination of the governing statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371

F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). We review for substantial evidence factual findings,

Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition

for review.

We reject Portillo-Mendez’s claim that she is eligible for asylum based on

her membership in a particular social group. See id. at 1171 (concluding “business

owners in Colombia who rejected demands by narco-traffickers to participate in

illegal activity” was “too broad to qualify as a particularized social group”). 

Because Portillo-Mendez failed to establish a nexus to a protected ground, her

asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502

U.S. 478, 483-484 (1992).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because

Portillo-Mendez failed to establish it is more likely than not she will be tortured by

or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See Sinha

v. Holder, 564 F.3d 1015, 1026 (9th Cir. 2009). 
3 09-72395

To the extent Portillo-Mendez raises the same ineffective assistance of

counsel challenge she raised to the BIA, it fails because she has not shown any

error. See Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 793 (9th Cir. 2005) (petitioner

must demonstrate “that counsel failed to perform with sufficient competence”). To

the extent Portillo-Mendez raises a new ineffective assistance of counsel challenge,

we lack jurisdiction because it was not exhausted. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358

F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 7, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00441

- CV

RIO GRANDE H2O GUARDIAN and Albert Furney Muller, Jr.,

Appellant s

v.

ROBERT MULLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD , DBA Robert Muller LTD and Rosetta

Stone, LLC,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20 13CVQ001860D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Catherine S t one, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The court has considered the A ppellant ’ s Moti on for Rehearing En Banc, and the motion

is DENIED.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS W HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 22, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-41560 Conference Calendar

DAVID SELVER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus COLLIN COUNTY DISTRICT COURT; COLLIN COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; CITY OF MCKINNEY; CITY OF PLANO POLICE DEPARTMENT; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Garland, Texas Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:02-CV-218

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * David Selver, Texas prisoner # 160221, appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his Eighth Amendment claims. His brief is devoid of legal argument and, given its most liberal construction, simply asserts that he amended his complaint to delete the claims that he is illegally incarcerated and to raise only his Eighth Amendment claim. He does not assign error to the dismissal of that claim for failure to file an amended complaintNo. 02-41560 -2- within the period prescribed by the magistrate judge. He has therefore not presented an issue for this court to review. Selver’s appeal is therefore without arguable merit and is dismissed as frivolous. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2; Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Selver is informed that the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), in addition to the strike he accumulated for the dismissal of Selver v. Ford Motor Credit Co. , No. 02-11044 (5th Cir. Jan. 24, 2003) (unpublished). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Selver also garnered a strike from the dismissal as frivolous of his § 1983 complaint in Selver v. Liberty Mutual Ins. , No. 02-CV-1643 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 28, 2002) (unpublished). Selver has thus accumulated three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He is BARRED from bringing any civil action or appeal in forma pauperis while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he shows that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES BAR IMPOSED.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

July 13, 2020 

Commenter David Calvin 

Re: In the Matter of Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Docket No. C-4724

Dear Mr. Calvin: 

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent 

agreement in the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment 

and placed it on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii). 

In your comment, you report that you purchased an item of Pottery Barn-branded 

furniture based on U.S.-origin claims and later discovered the item was wholly imported. Based 

on this experience, you state the Commission should amend the Complaint and Decision and 

Order to name Pottery Barn Furniture. 

Because Pottery Barn is a brand owned by Williams-Sonoma, Inc., the named respondent 

in this matter, the draft Decision and Order would address the deceptive claims you described. 

Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission has determined that the relief set 

forth in the Decision and Order is appropriate and sufficient. 

At this time, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be 

served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without modification. The final Decision 

and Order and other relevant materials are available on the Commission’s website at 

http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its 

work, and we thank you again for your comment. 

By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Slaughter not participating. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary
# National Homeownership Month, 2018 

During National Homeownership Month, we affirm the joy and benefits of homeownership. For millions of Americans, owning a home is an important step toward financial security and achieving the American Dream. My Administration is committed to fostering an economic environment in which every family has the opportunity to enjoy the sense of pride and stability that can come with owning a home.

Our Nation's economy is experiencing tremendous growth. I signed into law historic tax reform that cut taxes for middle class Americans and small businesses. My Administration has also slashed unnecessary and burdensome regulations that stunted economic growth. As a result of these actions, Americans are keeping more of their hard-earned paychecks, unemployment rates are at historic lows, and more Americans are entering the workforce. Consequently, owning a home is becoming more attainable for many Americans.

Numerous benefits are associated with homeownership. Owning a home gives Americans a place to call their own, and a place of comfort and safety where they can raise their families. Homeowners also support local businesses, have a strong vested interest in their communities, and foster bonds of friendship with others who live and work in their neighborhoods. A home is more than a place to live—it is also an investment in family, in community, and in the long-term prosperity of our great country.

This month, we celebrate those Americans whose success and determination have helped make them homeowners. Their dedication to their families and communities, and to achieving a brighter and more secure future, is an inspiration to each person who is pursuing their own American Dream.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2018 as National Homeownership Month.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-second.

[FR Doc. 2018-12257

Billing code 3295-F8-P
EX-10.30



 Exhibit 10.30 

Summary of 2014 Executive Officer Compensation 

The following shows the annual salary for each of Mattersight’s current executive officers: 

 

					
	 Kelly D. Conway, President and Chief Executive Officer:
	  	$	330,000	  
	 Christine R. Carsen, Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary:
	  	$	200,000	  
	 Christopher J. Danson, Executive Vice President of Delivery:
	  	$	290,000	  
	 Richard M. Dresden, Executive Vice President of Sales:
	  	$	250,000	  
	 David R. Gustafson, Executive Vice President of Products and Marketing:
	  	$	275,000	  
	 Mark Iserloth, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer:
	  	$	280,000	  

 Each of these executive officers have target bonus percentages as set forth in their employment agreements with Mattersight.
Additional information concerning the compensation of these executive officers is set forth in the Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed by Mattersight Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
#### James MARTIN v. STATE of Alabama.

3 Div. 816.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1978.

*1143Frank L. Thiemonge, III, Montgomery, for appellant.

William‘J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Samuel J. Clenney, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.

Conviction for first-degree burglary AFFIRMED without opinion. ■
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1255

ROBERT B. LEWIS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

DENNIS T. TAYLOR, President; TRUCK DRIVERS, DRIVER HELPERS, 

TAXICAB DRIVER, GARAGE EMPLOYEE, & AIRPORT EMPLOYEES LOCAL 

UNION 355,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. 

(1:11-cv-03460-BEL)

Submitted: June 21, 2012 Decided: July 10, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert B. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Robert B. Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing without prejudice Lewis’s complaint for failure 

to allege a cognizable claim. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545–46 (1949). The order Lewis seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order because it is possible for 

Lewis to cure the pleading deficiencies in the complaint that 

were identified by the district court. See Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 

(4th Cir. 1993) (holding that a dismissal without prejudice is 

not appealable unless it is clear that no amendment to the 

complaint “could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case” 

(internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Chao v. Rivendell 

Woods, Inc., 415 F.3d 342, 345 (4th Cir. 2005) (explaining that, 

under Domino Sugar, this court must “examine the appealability 

of a dismissal without prejudice based on the specific facts of 

the case in order to guard against piecemeal litigation and 

repetitive appeals”). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Helicopter Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
George J. Mehm, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 19, 2008
                                                 /S/ GEORGE J. MEHM, JR.
                                               -------------------------------
                                               George J. Mehm, Jr.
                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               (Principal Financial Officer)
#### Julienne N. HOLSCLAW, as Administratrix of the Estate of Richard W. Pickerill, Sr., Deceased, Appellant, v. William MURRELL, Jr., and Ann Murrell, Appellees.

No. 69-20.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from First Church
Financing Corporation financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,944
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,406,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,793,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      4,223,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     477,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,793,169
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               488,369
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             374,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,715
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,515
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>