alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000036548
<NAME> FIRST MORTGAGE CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         107,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  566,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               674,091
<PP&E>                                           6,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 924,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,102
<OTHER-SE>                                     782,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   924,655
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,441
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,110
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,778
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,332
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
September 27 , 2013

Mr

. Randall Fiertz
Director Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, ACO

- 1
Federal Aviation Administration Orville Wright Building 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

Re: Withdrawal of Revised Prelimina ry Application under 49 U.S.C. § 47134 for Chicago Midway International Airport

Dear M r. Fiertz :

The City of Chicago hereby withdraws its Revised Preliminary Application, filed January 17, 2013, under 49 U.S.C. § 47134 for Chicago Midway International Airp ort.

As you know, t he City of Chicago set high standards in exploring a potential leasing of Midway Airport that would ensure taxpayers and our airport stakeholders

– including the airlines, passengers, and workers

-- received a fair and equitable deal. T hroughout the process, the City remained committed to proceeding only if a transaction could meet the criteria. We said from the beginning that any potential lease would be structured differently and that it would not be supported unless very specific con ditions were met. A t this time, we do not believe these
conditions will be met.

On behalf of the City, I want to thank you and your team for the helpful assistance you have provided us as the City evaluated this potential transaction.

Sincerely,

Lo is Scott

Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00571

- CR

Ronald Paul Parks Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Court

o f Tarra nt County (1330306D )

August 21, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is orde red that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7720 

To permit child care providers that receive payment for services provided 

under the Child Care and Development Block Grant Act of 1990 to 

use a portion of such payment to pay the cost of sanitization and 

other costs associated with the COVID-19 public health emergency, necessary to protect the health of participating children and child care 

workers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2020 

Mr. CISNEROS (for himself and Mr. BACON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To permit child care providers that receive payment for services provided under the Child Care and Development 

Block Grant Act of 1990 to use a portion of such payment to pay the cost of sanitization and other costs 

associated with the COVID-19 public health emergency, 

necessary to protect the health of participating children 

and child care workers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7720 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Helping Child Care 

3 Providers Respond to the Coronavirus Public Health 

4 Emergency Act of 2020’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO PAY THE COST OF SANITIZATION 

6 AND OTHER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 

7 COVID-19 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY TO 

8 PROTECT CHILDREN WHO RECEIVE CERTAIN 

9 CHILD CARE SERVICES. 

10 A child care provider who receives payment for serv11 ices provided under the Child Care and Development 

12 Block Grant Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 9857 et seq.) may 

13 use a portion of such payment to pay the cost of sanitiza14 tion and other costs associated with the COVID-19 public 

15 health emergency, to protect children who receive such 

16 services and child care workers who provide such services. 

17 SEC. 3. DEFINITION. 

18 For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘COVID-19 public 

19 health emergency’’ means the public health emergency de20 clared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

21 under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

22 U.S.C. 247d) on January 31, 2020, with respect to 

23 COVID-19, including any renewal of the declaration. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



---

I, Patricia L. Moss, as Chief Executive Officer of Cascade Bancorp (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

1.The
  accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December
  31, 2002 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
  Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |                                        
|----------------------- |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated:February 24, 2003 |  |  | /s/ Patricia L. Moss                   
|                        |  |  |                                        
|                        |  |  | Patricia L. MossChief Executive Officer





---
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION


I, Harry Bergman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The First Republic
Corporation of America;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


November 14, 2003                  /s/ Harry Bergman
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Harry Bergman
                                   Chief Financial and Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32



STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE 
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF REGIONS FINANCIAL CORPORATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Regions Financial Corporation (the "Company") that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



DATE:  November 13, 2003

/s/ Carl E. Jones, Jr.                      Carl E. Jones, Jr.
Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer



DATE:  November 13, 2003

/s/ D. Bryan Jordan                       D. Bryan Jordan
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Regions Financial Corporation and will be retained by Regions Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Active Registrations by Fiscal Year,,
FY,Registrations,
2014,"217,855,796",
2015,"222,841,544",
2016,"226,001,288",
2017,"229,816,164",
2018,"235,302,818",
"Active Registratrions reflect the total number of phone numbers registered on the National Do Not Call Registry for each fiscal year as of September 30, 2018.",,
,,
Organizations Accessing the Registry by Fiscal Year,,
FY,Item,Count
2014,Number of entities that paid fees for access to the registry,"2,582"
2014,Number of entities that subscribed to five or fewer area codes,"23,049"
2014,Number of entities that registered as exempt entities,585
2014,Total,"26,216"
2015,Number of entities that paid fees for access to the registry,"2,502"
2015,Number of entities that subscribed to five or fewer area codes,"20,075"
2015,Number of entities that registered as exempt entities,521
2015,Total,"23,098"
2016,Number of entities that paid fees for access to the registry,"2,353"
2016,Number of entities that subscribed to five or fewer area codes,"17,634"
2016,Number of entities that registered as exempt entities,503
2016,Total,"20,490"
2017,Number of entities that paid fees for access to the registry,"2,259"
2017,Number of entities that subscribed to five or fewer area codes,"15,536"
2017,Number of entities that registered as exempt entities,543
2017,Total,"18,338"
2018,Number of entities that paid fees for access to the registry,"2,163"
2018,Number of entities that subscribed to five or fewer area codes,"15,045"
2018,Number of entities that registered as exempt entities,520
2018,Total,"17,728"
"Telemarketers and sellers can access up to five area codes on the Registry for free. To access more than five area codes, they must pay a fee. Organizations that are not selling goods or services are ""exempt"" and can access numbers on the Registry for free. This includes organizations asking for charitable contributions, raising money for political purposes, or conducting surveys. It also includes organizations calling only people they have an established business relationship with or who have given the organization written permission to call.",,
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. ("the
Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"),  I, Yi
He, Chief Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Yi He
---------------------------
Yi He
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 31, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 76 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 76

To amend Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to protect the 
``gig economy'' and small businesses that operate in large part through 
contractor services from the threat of costly class action litigation, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to protect the 
``gig economy'' and small businesses that operate in large part through 
contractor services from the threat of costly class action litigation, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect the Gig Economy Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTING THE GIG ECONOMY FROM CLASS ACTIONS.

    Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following:
            ``(5) the claim does not allege the misclassification of 
        employees as independent contractors.''.
                                 <all>
```
# **Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

** **

**I, Howard R. Levine, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the “Company”), dohereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:**

** **

**•****                 ****the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended February 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and**

** **

**•****                 ****the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.**

 

 
| **Date:  April 8, 2004** |                                                   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                   |
|                          |                                                   |
| **/s/**                       | **Howard R. Levine**                                   |   |
|                          | **Howard R. Levine**                                   |   |
|                          | **Chairman of the  Board and Chief Executive Officer** |   |
|                          | **(Principal  Executive Officer)**                     |   |

** **

** **

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Family DollarStores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.**

** **

----
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.      |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 14, 2011 | /s/ Robert S. Hekemian                            |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Robert S. Hekemian                                |
|                            | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
#### SUNLIFE INVESTORS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. James A. GELLER, Appellee.

No. 72-402.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 13, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION c 

Office of Hearings 

Washington, D. C. 

The Liberty Foundation, Inc. 

FAA DOCKET NO. 2012-0477 

(EIR 2011-GL-03-0070) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Hon. J. E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

RESPONDENT'S OBJECTIONS TO UNDISPUTED FACTS 

Pursuant to the Court's Order of April 2, 2014, Respondent herewith objects 

to the following two Declared Undisputed Facts, as follows: 

Finding No. 1 states in part that Respondent "holds an FAA Part 91 aircraft 

carrier certificate." 

Respondent objects to this statement because there is no Part 91 "aircraft 

carrier" or air carrier certificate issued by the FAA. Respondent operated at all 

times material as a Part 91 operation. 

Finding No. 43 states in part "the main fuel tank of the B-17 was discovered 

to be leaking, etc." 

Respondent believes it is more accurate to state "a" main fuel tank or "one 

of the" main fuel tanks, etc. 

STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, P. A. 

7300 NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380, MIAMI, FL 33156 

1 

To [305) 670-1222 Fo [305) 400-0685 STUARTGOLDLSTEINPA@ATT.NET 
Respectfully submitted, 

STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, P. A. 

7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 

Miami, FL 33156 

Tel: (305) 670-1222 

Fax: (305) 670-7065 

Email: stuartgoldsteinpa@att.net 

' ~ Stuart A. Goldstein 

Attorney for Respondent 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been served on this 17th day of 

April, 2014, as set forth below: 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Esq. 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

0. Box20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

By email and regular U. S. Mail 

and that an original and one copy was served upon: 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, D. C. 20591 

and that a copy was served upon: 

Honorable J. E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S. E. (E11-310) 

Washington, D. C. 20590 

STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, P. A. 

7300 NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380, MIAMI, FL 33156 

Tc (305) 670-1222 Fe (305) 400-0685 STUARTGOLDLSTEINPA@ATT.NET 

2 
By Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

and regular U. S. Mail 

Stuart A. Goldstein 

STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, P. A. 

7300 NORTH KENDALL DRIVE. SUITE 380, MIAMI, FL 33156 

T, (305) 670·1222 p, (305) 400·0685 STUARTGOLDLSTEINPA@ATT.NET 

3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

June 7, 2024

SC-2024-0258

Ex parte Reginald Lamar Bonner PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: 

Reginald Lamar Bonner v. State of Alabama) (Jefferson Circuit Court: 

CC-21-240 and CC-21-242; Criminal Appeals: CR-2022-1164).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above 

referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the 

Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was 

entered in this cause on June 7, 2024:

Writ Denied. No Opinion. Sellers, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Wise, 

Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur.

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified 

on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered 

by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are 

hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness 

my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama