alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 06 4 . J EAN J OCELYN MERI LI EN v . SARAH SI EDENTOPF et a l

.

On Ap ri l 16
, 2 0 1 9
, t he t ri al co u rt en t ered a fi n al o rd er d is m i ss i n g th e co m p l ai nt
fi led b y J ean Jo cel y n M eri li en as s ert i ng “ co n s p i racy t o co m m i t frau d / raci al
d i s cri m i n at i o n ” ag ai n s t Sarah Si ed en t o pf (a pri v at e at to rn ey ), Ti n a Ro b i n s o n (Cl erk

o f t h e Fu lt o n Co u n t y Su p eri o r Co u rt ), Ad ri en n e Nas h (Gri ev an ce Co u n s el o r fo r t h e St at e Bar o f G e o r g i a ), an d an u n n am ed cl erk o f t h e Fu l t o n Co u n t y Su p eri o r Co u rt

. M eri l i en t h en fi l ed a m o ti o n to s et as i d e t h e ju d g m en t p urs u an t t o OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0 (d ). On J u n e 2 1
, 2 0 1 9
, t h e tri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m ot i o n t o set as i d e, an d M eri l i en fi l ed

t h i s d i rect ap peal . Ho wev er, we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Un d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0 (d ), a ju dg m en t m ay b e s et as i de b as ed o n (1 ) l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n , (2 ) frau d
, acci d en t , o r m i s t ak e, o r (3 ) a n o n -am en d ab l e d efect o n t h e face

o f t h e reco rd o f p l ead i ng s

. An ap p eal fro m an o rd er d en y i n g a m o t i o n t o s et as i d e a ju d g m en t u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 1 -6 0 (d ) m us t be m ad e b y ap p l icat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (8 ). M eri l i en p ro p erl y fi l ed a d i s cret i o n ary ap p l i cat i o n, wh i ch t h i s Co u rt d en i ed

. See Cas e No

. A2 0 D0 0 09
, den i ed J u l y 2 9
, 2 0 1 9

. B e c au s e
t h at d en i al was an ad

ju d i cat i o n o n t h e m eri t s , t h e d o c t ri n e o f res ju d i cat a b ars t h i s d i rect ap peal

. See No r t h wes t S o ci a l & Ci vi c Cl u b

, In c. v. Fr an kl i n , 2 7 6 Ga. 8 5 9
, 8 6 0 (5 8 3 SE2 d 8 5 8 ) (2 0 0 3 ); Ho o k v. Ber g en , 2 8 6 Ga. August 07, 2019Ap p

. 2 5 8
, 2 6 0 -2 6 1 (1 ) (6 49 SE2 d 3 1 3 ) (2 00 7 ). A c c o r d i n g l y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/07/2019
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the 'Company') on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the 'Report'), I, Frederick S. Schiff, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
        dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company
        for the periods presented.

Dated: December 12, 2003

/s/ FREDERICK S. SCHIFF
 ...........................
Frederick S. Schiff
Chief Financial Officer









                                       60
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**** 

 

 

            In connection with the Annual Report of Klever Marketing, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Campbell, C.F.O. of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

            (1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

            (2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

/S/     Robert A. Campbell      

Robert A. Campbell

Coo and CFO

 

 

December 7, 2010

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-31

----
FTC’s Proposed Partial Stipulated Order for 

Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment

Attachment 1C

Part 3 of 4

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 2 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 3 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 4 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 5 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 6 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 7 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 8 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 9 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 10 of 11
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-5 Filed 06/28/16 Page 11 of 11
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Adept Technology, Inc. (the
Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  |  | the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 10, 2008

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ John Dulchinos                   
|John Dulchinos                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 10, 2008

|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/ Lisa M. Cummins       
|Lisa M. Cummins           
|Vice President of Finance,
|Chief Financial Officer   

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code).

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Adept Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Adept Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40301

JOHNSON J. LEWIS,

Plaintiff-Appellee

VERSUS

WAYNE SCOTT; JAMES SHAW,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

For the Eastern District of Texas

(6:94-CV-689)

September 2, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This case is on appeal from a Declaratory Judgment rendered in

favor of Plaintiff-Appellee by the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Texas. Plaintiff-Appellee, Johnson J.

Lewis, Texas prisoner number 629945, successfully argued before the

district court that his rights under the Religious Freedom

Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1, had been violated by
the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division’s

facial hair policy, in that he was not allowed to grow a full beard

and clipped moustache in accordance with the tenets of his Islamic

faith. The district court’s judgment and subsequent denial of

Appellants’ Motion for New Trial and the filing of Appellants’

brief on appeal all preceded the Supreme Court’s decision in City

of Boerne v. P.F. Flores, Archbishop of San Antonio, ___ U.S. ___,

117 S.Ct. 2157, (1997), wherein Justice Kennedy, writing for the

Court, explained that the RFRA exceeded the power of Congress under

§ 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Therefore, the statutory basis for Plaintiff-Appellee’s claim

having evaporated, this matter is reversed and remanded to the

district court with instructions to dismiss Plaintiff-Appellee’s

claim based on the RFRA.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DERRICK TT WALKER,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 257 EAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 13th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Scott Meyer Complainant


### v. FAA Docket No. 16-12-14 City ofCincinnati, Ohio Respondent.

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor FederallyAssistedAirportEnforcementProceedings, 14 CPR, Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CPR, Part 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Determination will be issued inthis matter is hereby extended to September 15,2014. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance

and Management Analysis Date 

### r- ,CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 30, 2014, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid), a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to: ScottMeyer 7107 Overton Way Mainesville, OH 45039 Complainant JohnP. Curp Andrew W. Garth Terrance A. Nestor Office ofthe City Solicitor 801 Plum Street, Suite 234 Cincinnati, OH 45202 W. Eric Pilsk PeterJ. Kirsh Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell, LLP 1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 Counsel for Respondent
Hand Delivered to: FAAPart 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-100

# ~~ .vI 'ALao

# eTOrgerso'!1'ft~ Office ofAirport Compliance and

Management Analysis
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### SEP 30 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

HARRISON DWIGHT FOOS; CAROLYN SUE FOOS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. STEVE TIMKEN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 97-3129 (D.C. No. 97-CV-1129-MLB)

(Kansas)



### ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The c ause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiffs Harrison Dwight Foos and Carolyn Sue Foo s appeal the dismissal-2-

without prejudice of their complaint against Steve Timken. We agree with the district court that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court substantially for the reasons given in the court’s Memorandum and Order dated May 5, 1997. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Stephanie K. Seymour Chief Judge
EXHIBIT 15

First Commerce Corporation
New Orleans, Louisiana




Gentlemen:

RE:   June 30, 1997 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

With  respect  to  the subject Quarterly Report, we acknowledge
our awareness of the  inclusion  therein  of  our  report dated
August  7,  1997  related  to  our  review of interim financial
information  and  that  said report will  be  included  in  any
registration  statement filed  by  First  Commerce  Corporation
through incorporation  by  reference  of  the subject Quarterly
Report into such registration statements.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities  Act,  such report
is  not considered a part of a Registration Statement  prepared
or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified
by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
Act.



                                   /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


New Orleans, Louisiana
August 13, 1997
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00197

- CV

Salvador Zavala v. Carlos C. Boliva, Et Al.

On Appeal from the 343rd District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 17

- 1490

- CV

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant , Salvador Zavala.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 11, 2019
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                       243
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,590
<PP&E>                                           3,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,429
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,682
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,917)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,695
<SALES>                                          7,794
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,794
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,963
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (29)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    132
<INCOME-TAX>                                        23
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                109
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       109
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 17, 2016

t1110 

# Order

Clerk November 17, 2016

153472

CURTIS JACKSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153472

COA: 324600

Ct of Claims: 14

- 000097

- MP

MADISON SUTHERLAND,

Defendant,

and

ERICA HUSS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. (the“Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Brian J. Farrell,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian J. Farrell    |   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Brian J. Farrell        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | June  11, 2003     |

 

----
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41204

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS ALANIZ-CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-99-CR-162-1

 

September 6, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender for the Southern District of Texas

has moved for leave to withdraw as court-appointed counsel for Luis

Alaniz-Cruz and filed the brief required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Alaniz-Cruz has filed a brief in response

opposing the motion.
2

Our review of the briefs and our independent review of the

record disclose no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the

motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; Ceramic Composite Aircraft Brake Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 15, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Ceramic Composite 
Aircraft Brake Consortium (``CCAB'') filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) the 
nature and objectives of the research and development venture. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 
Act, the identifies of the parties are Ohio Aerospace Institute, 
Cleveland, OH; AlliedSignal Aerospace, Phoenix, AZ; Aircraft Braking 
Systems Corporation, Akron, OH; Parker Hannefin Corporation, Irvine, CA 
and BF Goodrich Aerospace, Brecksville, OH. CCAB is dedicated to 
researching and developing the application of ceramic matrix materials 
to aircraft braking systems.
    Membership in this project remains open, and CCAB intends to file 
additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership. 
Information regarding participation in CCAB may be obtained from Eileen 
Pickett, Ohio Aerospace Institute, Cleveland, OH.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-3830 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
## COURT OF APPEALS

SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA C. MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA

JASON PULLIAM

JUSTICES FOURTH COURT OF APPE ALS DISTRICT

CADENA

- REEVES JUSTICE CENTE R

300 DOLOROSA, SUIT E 3200

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 7 8205

- 3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4TH COA.ASPX KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210) 335

- 2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210) 335

- 2762

August 5, 2015

Anthony Colton

Attorney at Law

301 Fair Ave.

San Antonio, TX 78223

- 1111

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Joshua Somers

Bexar County Assistant District

Attorney

101 West Nueva Street

San Antonio, TX 78205

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04

- 15

- 00027

- CR

Trial Court Case Number: 2012CR9653

Style: Linda Mart inez a/k/a Linda Ramirez v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

The above cause has been set for formal submission ON BRIEFS ONLY before this

Court on Tuesday, September 8, 2015

, before a panel consisting of Justice Rebeca C. Martinez,

Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa

.

Very truly yours,

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________ Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853