alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending January 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),

INeil H. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.            The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

2.            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

                 /s/ Neil H. Ellis           Neil H. EllisPresident and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

Date:  March 15, 2005
Exhibit 10.1


     This will confirm the agreement by and among the undersigned that the
Schedule l3D filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof with respect to the beneficial ownership of the undersigned of
shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share of Spacial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, is being filed, and all amendments thereto will be filed,
on behalf of each of the persons and entities named below in accordance with
Rule l3d-1(k) under the Securities Exchange Act of l934, as amended. This
Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.

Dated: July 2, 2001
                                            /s/ Bruce Caputo
                                            --------------------------------
                                                Bruce Caputo


                                            Trust Under Agreement Dated 6/30/89

                                        By: /s/ Bruce Caputo
                                            --------------------------------
                                                Bruce Caputo, as Trustee






                               Page 10 of 11 Pages
#### James MILLOR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-582.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1971.

Joel Hirschhorn, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Jesse J. McCrary, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen.-, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Dreger v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 431.
Order filed November 10, 2022

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00714

- CV

____________ JOHN SMITH , Appellant

V. KERVARA WILLIAMS INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F D.S., MINOR , Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 49535



### ORDER The notice of appeal in this case was filed Octobe r 3, 2022 . The clerk responsible for preparing the record notified this court that appellant has not made payment for the record. No evidence that app ellant has established indigence has
been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. On October 19, 2022, this court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant filed a responsewith proof of payment for the record. No response was fi led. Therefore, the court

issues the following orde r. Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court within ten (10) days of the
date of this order arrangements have been made to pay for the clerk’s record. See
Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If appellant fail s to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal
without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
---

EXHIBIT 99.4

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, Lou van Vuuren, Chief Financial Officer of Great Basin Gold
Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Lou van Vuuren     
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | Lou van Vuuren         
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | February 20, 2009      

---
OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

August 25, 2015

VIA EMAIL

Jon Weiswasser

Sigma Plastics Group/Filmtech

1577 Hagys Ford Rd

Narberth, PA 19072

Re: Buffer Zone Reduction Credit Request for the "Filmtech Grozone Max TIF" tarp

Dear Mr. Weiswasser: 

This letter serves as the response to your request for EPA approval of soil fumigant buffer zone 

reduction credits for the "Filmtech Grozone Max TIF" tarp.

The EPA has reviewed the laboratory tarp permeability testing data for this tarp, which was

submitted on your behalf by Dr. Husein Ajwa, of the University of California - Davis, on July 6, 

2015. Based on the calculated mass transfer coefficients (MTCs) and the corresponding cut 

points determined by EPA as a basis for assigning buffer zone credits (DP Barcode 385314. 

Dawson, Smith and Shelat. “Second Update to Health Effects Division Recommendations for 

Good Agricultural Practices and Associated Buffer Credits.” January 11, 2011), the tarp 

qualifies for the following buffer zone reduction credits: 60% for chloropicrin.

The tarp name will be added to the appropriate category on the EPA soil fumigant tarp webpage: 

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/tarpcredits/

Please contact me at (703) 347-8652 or at gayoso.jose@epa.gov if you have any questions. 

Sincerely,

Jose Gayoso

Chemical Review Manager

Risk Management & Implementation Branch II

Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 
Enclosure:

Qian, Y. Data Review of the permeability of chloropicrin through Filmtech Grozone Max 

Totally Impermeable Film (Bean 420212) by Sigma Plastics Group/Filmtech, ACB Project 

#B15-07. July 15, 2015.
<PAGE>   1



Exhibit 15.   Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information from KPMG
              Peat Marwick LLP


Independent Auditors' Review Report



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
First American Corporation:

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheets of First American Corporation
and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
income statements, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 1997 and 1996. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's
management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of First American Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996; and the related consolidated income
statements, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 16, 1997, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 1996, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
-------------------------------


July 17, 1997
Nashville, Tennessee
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fansteel Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Gary L. Tessitore, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Office of the Company and R. Michael McEntee, as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Fansteel Inc. and will be retained
by Fansteel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated: November 12, 2004

                                     /s/ Gary L. Tessitore
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Gary L. Tessitore
                                     Chairman of the Board, President and
                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                     /s/ R. Michael McEntee
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     R. Michael McEntee
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
Order entered January 27, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01410-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF JUIA L. VARGO AND 

ROBERT T. O'DONNELL

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-50667-2013

ORDER

Both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record in this case are overdue. By letters dated 

November 25, 2013, we notified appellant the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record had not 

been filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the records. By 

letters dated December 4, 2013 and December 5, 2013, appellant responded that arrangements 

had been made to pay for the records. 

 Therefore, we ORDER Collin County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record within 

TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order. We notify appellant that if we receive verification 

appellant has not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record, we will, without further 

notice, dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We also ORDER Court Reporter to file the reporter’s record within TWENTY DAYS of 

the date of this order. We notify appellant that if we receive verification appellant has not paid 
for or made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, we will order the appeal submitted 

without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

following persons:

Andrea Stroh Thompson

Collin County District Clerk

Karla Kimbrell

Official Court Reporter, 380th Judicial District Court

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.1

 CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         AND ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K

I, David Pollock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hydron Technologies,
   Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
   procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for
   the registrant and have:

   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation); and

   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
   over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
   committee of registrant's board of directors:

   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

/s/ David Pollock
-----------------
David Pollock
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

May 15, 2006
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman 

 Noah Joshua Phillips 

 Rohit Chopra

 Rebecca Kelly Slaughter

 Christine S. Wilson

In the Matter of

RAG-Stiftung, 

 a public-private foundation; 

Evonik Industries AG, 

 a public company; 

Evonik Corporation, 

 a public company; 

Evonik International Holding B.V., 

 a public company; 

One Equity Partners Secondary Fund 

L.P., 

 a private company; Docket No. 9384 

One Equity Partners V, L.P.

 a private company; 

Lexington Capital Partners VII (AIV 

I), L.P., 

 a private company; 

PeroxyChem Holding Company LLC, 

 a private company; 

PeroxyChem Holdings, L.P., 

 a private company; 

PeroxyChem Holdings LLC, 

 a private company; 

PeroxyChem LLC, 

 a private company; 
2 

and

PeroxyChem Cooperatief U.A., 

 a private company. 

ORDER WITHDRAWING MATTER FROM ADJUDICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 3.26(c) OF THE COMMISSION RULES OF PRACTICE

 On February 7, 2020, counsel for all the Respondents in this proceeding filed a Motion to 

the Commission for Withdrawal of the Matter from Adjudication. Also on February 11, 2020, 

Complaint Counsel filed a Response to Respondent’s Motion, advising that Complaint Counsel 

do not oppose Respondents’ Motion. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.26(c) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 

C.F.R. § 3.26(c), that this matter in its entirety be and it hereby is withdrawn from adjudication, 

and that all proceedings before the Administrative Law Judge be and they hereby are stayed.

By the Commission, Chairman Simons recused. 

April J. Tabor 

Acting Secretary

SEAL:

ISSUED: February 11, 2020
254 La. 859

#### Dianne RIDGE, Aaron Prescott v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY et al.

No. 50149.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: August J. Beyl applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 225 So.2d 704; 225 So.2d 707.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

August 8, 2018

Order 

Clerk

August 8, 2018

158015(42)

KEAGAN FARRIS, by and through his

Next Friend, JAMES FARRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

SC: 158015

v COA: 337366

Antrim CC: 2016-009053-NM

JOHN H. MCKAIG, II,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to substitute “ELIZABETH ELLEN 

MCKAIG, Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN H. MCKAIG, II” as the 

defendant-appellee in all further proceedings before this Court is GRANTED.
#### Joseph GORDON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1045.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 21, 1971.

Joseph Gordon, m pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a *46motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and haying furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROGER K. SNYDER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 58 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
#### NESTLE COMPANY, INC., a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Robert C. WEISKOPF et al., Appellees.

No. 73-773.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
_____________ No. 95-3447MN

_____________ Randall H. Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Minnesota. Shirley S. Chater, * Commissioner of Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED] Administration, * *

Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: July 18, 1996 Filed: July 30, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Randall H. Smith appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Smith disabilit y insurance benefits. After careful review of the parties' briefs and the adm inistrative record, we affirm for the reasons stated in the distric t court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.