alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Scott’s Petition.

*Taxation*— Assessment—Appeal—Finding *of fact.*

Where on an appeal by a landowner from the assessment of the county commissioners, the court has reduced the valuation to the public sale value, a finding of fact by it that such valuation is uniform with the valuation of other real estate throughout the county will not be disturbed except for manifest error.

Argued Feb. 7, 1911.

April 10, 1911:

Appeal, No. 310, Jan. T., 1910, by Edgar T. Scott, from order of C. P. Delaware Co., March T., 1910, No. 90, in Re Appeal of Edgar T. Scott from assessment for taxation.

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Appeal under the Act of April 19, 1889, P. L. 38, from tax assessment.

Broomall, J., found, inter alia, the following as a fact:

We are convinced that there is no such thing in Delaware county as adjusting the tax valuations at a less sum than the public sale valuations, and that such a rule would be a bad one to adopt. [2]

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the case.

*Error assigned*among others was (2) above finding of the court.

*Lewis Lawrence Smith,*for appellant.

*Frank G. Perrin,*county solicitor, for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff’s property was assessed for taxation at $192,800. The court found that its public sale value was $130,000 and reduced the assessment to that amount. He claimed a further reduction on the allegation that the standard of valuation throughout the district was below the market value. The court found that the valuation *312of $130,000 was uniform with the valuation of other real estate throughout the county. This finding, to which an exception is taken has not only all the weight of a finding of fact by the court, but the rule that such a finding will not be disturbed except for manifest error applies to it with exceptional force because of the nature of the subject of inquiry.

The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6630

JERRY A. GARLAND,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

L. M. SAUNDERS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-00-418-7)

Submitted: August 31, 2001 Decided: March 11, 2002

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry A. Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry A. Garland seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Garland v. Saunders, No. CA-00-

418-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2001). Garland’s motion for appointment

of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
No. 10414.

#### Wonders, Admr., *v.*The Pennsylvania Co.

Decided April 28, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court' of Trumbull county.

*Mr. Charles Fillius*and *Mr. Jay Buchwalter,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Carey & Mullins,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
##### 



BancWest Corporation and Subsidiaries 
EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K(Continued) Exhibit 12 Statement re: Computation of Ratios BancWest Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges Three Months Ended March 31,2004
    
    2003(Dollars in thousands)Income before income taxes
    
    $
    184,717
    
    
    $
    166,723Fixed charges (1):Interest expense
    
    
    96,126
    
    
    
    102,237Rental expense
    
    
    4,069
    
    
    
    5,229100,195
    
    
    
    107,466Less interest on deposits
    
    
    43,436
    
    
    
    53,147Net fixed charges
    
    
    56,759
    
    
    
    54,319Earnings, excluding interest on deposits
    
    $
    241,476
    
    
    $
    221,042Earnings, including interest on deposits
    
    $
    284,912
    
    
    $
    274,189Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:Excluding interest on deposits
    
    
    4.25
    x
    
    
    4.07
    xIncluding interest on deposits
    
    
    2.84
    x
    
    
    2.55
    x
   (1)
    
    For purposes of computing the consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed
charges, earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges.
Fixed charges, excluding interest on deposits, include interest (other
than on deposits), whether expensed or capitalized, and that portion of
rental expense (generally one third) deemed representative of the interest
factor. Fixed charges, including interest on deposits, consists of the
foregoing items plus interest on deposits.
^
                                  Diamond Hill
                                  ------------
                                  Investments


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
                                             Investor Contact:
                                             James F. Laird
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             614-255-3353
                                             E-mail: (jlaird@diamond-hill.com)

                      DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.
          ANNOUNCES UNAUDITED RESULTS FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

     Columbus,  Ohio -- August 13, 2004, -- Diamond Hill  Investment  Group,
Inc. (NASDAQ:DHIL) today reported unaudited results for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004.  Assets under management increased by 95% to $322 million
compared to June 30, 2003 and investment management fees increased by 99%
compared to the second quarter of 2003.  The net operating loss for the
quarter was $241,000, a 43% improvement compared to the second quarter of
2003.  The net loss for the quarter was $234,000 or 15 cents per share, which
comparies with a net loss of $181810 or 13 cents per share for the second
quarter of 2003, with the increase primarily due to higher staffing levels
from a year ago, as well as lower investment income in this quarter compared
with the same period last year.

     Ric Dillon, president and chief investment officer stated, "We have
continued to produce excellent investment returns for our clients, which is
our primary objective.  In addition, our efforts to market our investment
services have resulted in $65 million in new client investments in our
managed accounts and mutual funds through the first six months of the year.
We expect long term benefits fromthe expansion of our marketing efforts
through increased staffing in April.  We will maintain our focus on serving
our clients' investment needs, and we expect to have continued success in
growing our business in the future."  Dillono added that "our new colleagues
purchased 60,000 shares of Company stock in a private placement that closed
July 21, 2004, which is further evidence of the confidence we have in our
future.

About Diamond Hill:

     Diamond Hill provides investment management services to individuals and
institutions seeking to preserve and build wealth.  The firm currently manages
mutual funds, seperate accounts and a private investment fund.  For more
information on Diamond Hill, visit www.diamond-hill.com.



                                     ###

            375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio 43215
                         614-255-3333  fax 614-255-3363
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

            We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statements No. 333-30655, 333-74747 and 333-74715 of THQ Inc. on Forms S-8 and
Registration Statements No. 333-32221, 333-60277 and 333-70335 on Forms S-3 of
our report dated February 24, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of THQ Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 31, 1999
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         Each director and/or officer of NetMed, Inc. (the "Corporation") whose
signature appears below hereby appoints David J. Richards, Kenneth B. Leachman
and William J. Kelly, Jr. as the undersigned's attorneys, or any of them
individually as the undersigned's attorney, to sign, in the undersigned's name
and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any
and all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby also appoints
such persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact
with like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto
granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney-in-fact or the
undersigned's substitute may do by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 20th day of
March, 1998.

         Signature                                 Title


      /s/ DAVID J. RICHARDS                 President and Director
     ------------------------------
     David J. Richards


      /s/ JOHN P. KENNEDY                   Vice President-Business Development,
     ------------------------------         Treasurer, Assistant Secretary,
     John P. Kennedy                        and Director                   
                                            


      /s/ KENNETH B. LEACHMAN               Vice President - Finance and
     ------------------------------         Chief Financial Officer
     Kenneth B. Leachman                    


      /s/ WILLIAM J. KELLY, JR.             Vice President, Secretary
     ------------------------------         and General Counsel
     William J. Kelly, Jr.


      /s/ S. TREVOR FERGER                  Director
     ------------------------------
     S. Trevor Ferger


      /s/ MICHAEL S. BLUE                   Director
     ------------------------------
     Michael S. Blue


      /s/ CECIL J. PETITTI                  Director
     ------------------------------
     Cecil J. Petitti


      /s/ ROBERT J. MASSEY                  Director
      ------------------------------
     Robert J. Massey


      /s/ JAMES F. ZID                      Director
     ------------------------------
     James F. Zid
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before August 13, 2018.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (“Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on January 1, 2018, Johnson Matthey Pharmaceutical Materials Inc., 25 Patton Road, Devens, MA 01434 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer for the basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleAmphetamine
1100
IIMethylphenidate
1724
IINabilone
7379
IIHydrocodone
9193
IILevorphanol
9220
IIAlfentanil
9737
IIRemifentanil
9739
IISufentanil
9740
II
 The company plans to utilize this facility to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers as well as to conduct analytical testing in support of the company's primary manufacturing facility in West Deptford, New Jersey. Dated: June 6, 2018. John J. Martin, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-12685 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2009

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 3/26 3/30 4/2 24.00 30.00 29.00 84.00 -1.00

3&6 MONTH BILLS 4/2 4/6 4/9 24.00 30.00 29.00 79.00 4.00

4/9 4/13 4/16 20.00 27.00 27.00 73.00 1.00

4/16 4/20 4/23 10.00 27.00 27.00 22.00 70.00 16.00

4/23 4/27 4/30 10.00 27.00 27.00 72.00 -8.00

4/30 5/4 5/7 20.00 28.00 27.00 75.00 0.00

5/7 5/11 5/14 30.00 28.00 27.00 72.00 13.00

5/14 5/18 5/21 30.00 28.00 27.00 25.00 64.00 46.00

5/21 5/26 5/28 30.00 30.00 28.00 65.00 23.00

5/28 6/1 6/4 30.00 30.00 28.00 74.00 14.00

6/4 6/8 6/11 25.00 30.00 29.00 82.00 2.00

6/11 6/15 6/18 20.00 30.00 29.00 25.00 84.00 20.00

6/18 6/22 6/25 20.00 30.00 29.00 84.00 -5.00

1031.00 978.00 125.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

Matures 4/2 35.00 -35.00

Matures 4/9 35.00 -35.00

Matures 4/15 40.00 -40.00

Matures 4/17 40.00 -40.00

27-DAY BILL 5/19 5/20 35.00 35.00 0.00

Matures 6/16

112-DAY BILL 5/27 5/27 50.00 50.00

Matures 9/16

13-DAY BILL 6/1 6/2 25.00 25.00 0.00

Matures 6/15

91-DAY BILL 6/23 6/24 40.00 40.00

Matures 9/23

CMB Funds: -60.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

10-Year TIPS 4/2 4/6 4/15 6.00

3-Year Note 4/6 4/7 4/15 35.00

10-Year Note ® 4/6 4/8 4/15 20.00

30-Year Bond ® 4/6 4/9 4/15 10.00 15.10 57.90

5-Year TIPS 4/20 4/23 4/30 8.00

2-Year Note 4/23 4/27 4/30 45.00

5-Year Note 4/23 4/28 4/30 40.00 19.00 74.00

3-Year Note 4/29 5/5 5/15 35.00

10-Year Note 4/29 5/6 5/15 25.00

30-Year Bond 4/29 5/7 5/15 15.00 52.20 22.80

2-Year Note 5/21 5/27 6/1 45.00

5-year Note 5/21 5/28 6/1 40.00 19.00 66.00

3-Year Note 6/8 6/9 6/15 35.00

10-Year Note ® 6/8 6/10 6/15 20.00

30-Year Bond ® 6/8 6/11 6/15 10.00 14.90 50.10

2-Year Note 6/22 6/23 6/30 45.00

5-year Note 6/22 6/25 3/31 35.00 18.00 62.00

469.00 138.20 332.80

Estimates are italicized. Shaded regions in Cash Management Section denote funds raised for Supplementary Financing Program

SFP funds are not technically marketable Treasury borrowing NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 397.80

R = Reopening
#### PUBLIC FURNITURE STORE, INC., a corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Urbicio R. SIERRA, Appellee.

No. 73-275.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 1, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit C
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1486

BENJAMIN ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus AMERICAN MEDICAL LABS, now known as Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-03-1044-A) Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 13, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jackson Mitchell, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Benjamin Roberts appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court from the bench. See Roberts v. Am. Med. Labs , No. CA-03-1044-A (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 19, 2004 & entered Mar. 22, 2004); R. Vol. 3. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.2

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the
"Company" ) on Form 10Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"),
I Stuart I. Greenwald, Treasurer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Stuart I. GreenwaldStuart I. Greenwald Treasurer 
September 11, 2003
No. 98-51067

-1-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-51067 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUCILA DOMINGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. P-98-CR-98-2

--------------------

April 12, 2000

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Lucila Dominguez has

filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Dominguez and a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Dominguez has not responded to counsel’s motion. Our independent

review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue. Accordingly, the attorney’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED; the attorney is excused from further responsibilities 

herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                     863557
<NAME>                    SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
<MULTIPLIER>              1,000
<CURRENCY>                U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           6,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,866
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,919
<PP&E>                                         597,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                 131,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 636,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,871
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                     327,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   636,283
<SALES>                                        873,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               873,433
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  774,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (891)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 93,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                    37,795
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             55,511
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,511
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
<FN>
EPS-PRIMARY and EPS-DILUTED  include the effect of a 3-for-2 stock split payable
on April 10, 1999.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

       In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The First
Republic Corporation of America (the "Company") for the quarter ended September
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan P. Rosen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Johnathan P. Rosen
   ---------------------------
Name:  Jonathan P. Rosen
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002