alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

July 13, 2020

Commenter Aaron Ahern

Re:In the Matter of Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Docket No. C-4724

Dear Mr. Ahern:

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent 

agreement in the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment 

and placed it on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii).

In your comment, you state the Commission should eliminate Part X of the Decision and 

Order, titled “Order Effective Dates,” which contains a provision terminating (“sunsetting”) the 

administrative order twenty years after its date of issuance. This standard provision appears in 

all administrative orders in furtherance of the FTC’s Policy Statement Regarding Duration of 

Competition and Consumer Protection Orders.1 This policy statement, issued nearly twenty-five

years ago after an opportunity for public comment, provides the Commission will ordinarily 

sunset administrative orders automatically after twenty years, unless the FTC or Department of 

Justice has filed a complaint in federal court to enforce such order pursuant to Section 5(1) of the 

Federal Trade Commission Act. 

In this case, there is no basis for the Commission to depart from its longstanding twentyyear administrative sunset policy. Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission 

has determined that the public interest would best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in 

final form without modification. The final Decision and Order and other relevant materials are 

available on the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s 

analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, and we thank you again for your comment.

By direction of the Commission.

April J. Tabor

Secretary

 1 60 FR 42569 (Aug. 16, 1995).
Order entered November e , 2012 

In The 

Court of Zippealo 

if iftb 4113 iss tritt of Texao at attao 

No. 05-12-00578-CR 

BILLY CLYDE STELL, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-62140-Y 

ORDER 

The Court GRANTS court reporter Sharon Hazlewood's motion for extension of time to 

file the reporter's record. 

We ORDER Ms. Hazlewood to file the reporter's record within FIFTEEN DAYS from 

the date of this order.
Exhibit 10.1 (al)  AMENDMENT NUMBER 7
TO THE
SAUER-DANFOSS EMPLOYEES
SAVINGS PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1997)  By virtue and
in exercise of the amending power reserved to Sauer-Danfoss (US) Company (the
Company) by Section 14.1 of Sauer-Danfoss Employees Savings Plan as amended
and restated effective January 1, 1997 (the Plan) and pursuant to the
authority delegated to the undersigned officer of the Company by the Employee
Benefits Committee of the Company, the Plan is hereby amended and, effective as
of February 1, 2003, by adding the following new Section A-10 to follow
immediately after Section A-9 of the Appendix A entitled Application of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001:  A-10. Catch-up
Contributions.    All Employees who
are eligible to make elective deferrals under the Plan and who have attained
age 50 before the close of the Plan Year shall be eligible to make Catch-up
Contributions in accordance with, and subject to the limitations of, Section
4l4(v) of the Code. Such Catch-up Contributions shall not be taken into account
for purposes of the provisions of the Plan implementing the required
limitations of Sections 402(g) and 415 of the Code or for purposes of the
Matching Contribution provisions of Section 5.1(b) of the Plan. The Plan shall
not be treated as failing to satisfy the provisions of the plan implementing
the requirements of Section 401(k)(3), 401(k)(11), 401(k)(12), 410(b), or 416
of the Code, as applicable, by reason of the making of such Catch-up
Contributions.  IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Company has authorized the execution on its behalf this Amendment
Number 7, this 20th day of January, 2003.   SAUER
  DANFOSS (US) COMPANYBy:
  /s/Kenneth D. McCuskeyKenneth D. McCuskeyVice President Finance
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

The Board of Directors

O'Charley's Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-39872, No. 33-51316, No. 33-51258, No. 33-83172, No. 33-69934, No. 333-63495, No. 333-59484, No. 333-126221 and No. 333-129783, on Form S-8) of O'Charley's Inc. of our reports dated March 12, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of O'Charley's Inc. as of December 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 30, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, and the internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2007, which reports appear in the December 30, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of O'Charley's Inc.

 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes*in 2007 and the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123(R), *Share-based Payment* in 2006.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Nashville, Tennessee

March 12, 2008
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT**

 

I, Howard R.Levine, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Family DollarStores, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

•                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarter ended May 29, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  July 2, 2004

 

 
| /s/    | Howard R.  Levine                                  |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Howard R.  Levine                                  |
|   | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                     |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Family DollarStores, Inc. and will be retained by Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00309-CV

Jose “Joe” Flores

v.

Everardo “Ever” Villarreal

On Appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-1121-20-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 17, 2020
**WINTHROP
        REALTY TRUST**
 **FORM
        10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2008**


Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust
      (“the
      Company”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas
      C. Staples, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
      1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





By:
            /s/Thomas
                C. StaplesName:
            Thomas
                C. StaplesChief
                Financial Officer





November
      10, 2008
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Sobrescribir enlaces de ayuda a la navegación
      Inicio
                                                                        Programas de reembolsos de la FTCView this page in English

  
      Reembolsos de Lions Not Sheep mayo 2023

La FTC envía reembolsos a las personas que compraron ropa y accesorios de Lions Not Sheep


La FTC está enviando pagos por un total de más de $176,000 a la gente que compró ropa y accesorios en línea a Lions Not Sheep. Según la FTC, la compañía usó etiquetas y publicidad engañosas de “Made in USA” en productos importados de otros países.



Lions Not Sheep Products, LLC y su propietario, Sean Whalen, entregaron dinero para resolver los cargos de la FTC. Por consiguiente, la FTC está enviando 11,512 reembolsos en cheques y pagos vía PayPal.

Si recibe un cheque, cóbrelo dentro de los 90 días.

Si recibe un pago a través de PayPal, por favor, acéptelo dentro de los 30 días.

Puede encontrar respuestas a las preguntas más comunes sobre pagos de reembolsos ennuestra página de preguntas frecuentes. Si tiene alguna otra pregunta, por favor, llame al administrador de reembolsos al 1-855-620-9529.
                  Casos relacionados
            
          Lions Not Sheep
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.6(k)
---------------

                  LETTER AMENDMENT TO THE REVOLVING CREDIT AND

                           LETTER OF CREDIT AGREEMENT

Letterhead of Mercantile Safe Deposit & Trust Company

   Philip G. Enstice
   Senior Vice President
   (410) 237-5478
   (410) 237-5703 (fax)

   March 11, 2002

   Mr. John L. Sams, President
   Environmental Elements Corporation
   P. O. Box 1318
   Baltimore, Maryland 21203

   Dear John:

   Reference is made to the Revolving Credit and Letter of Credit Agreement
   dated November 24, 1993 as amended by and among Environmental Elements
   Corporation and Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Company. The Mercantile Board
   of Directors has approved the following revisions to the Agreement:

   1.   The maturity date will be extended two years from April 1, 2002 to April
        1, 2004.

   2.   The monthly borrowing base calculation that is used to determine the
        portion of the $15,000,000 facility that can be accessed for borrowings
        and letters of credit shall be revised. The new calculation  will be
        based on 80% of eligible accounts receivable, 50% of retainage, and 50%
        of unbilled costs under 120 days.

   3.   It shall constitute a default under the Agreement if Environmental
        Elements Corporation has a pretax profit of less than $500,000 for the
        six month period ending September 30, 2002. Also, a default will occur
        if EEC has a pretax profit of less than $500,000 for the six month
        period from October 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003.

   Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions concerning the
   above terms. By copy of this letter, I am requesting that J. Michael Brennan,
   Esq. draft an amendment to the loan documentation reflecting the changes.

                                                             Very truly yours,

                                                             Philip G. Enstice

                                       48
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MARION CROSBY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 404 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
---

CONSENT OF AUTHOR

****

DEON VAN DER HEEVER PO Box 20 Potchefstroom, 2520
South Africa Email: deon@geologix.co.za



US Securities and Exchange Commission



I, Deon van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat., certify that I have read
the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that
there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical
Report or that the written disclosure in the Form 40F of Great Basin Gold Ltd.
contains any misrepresentation of the information contained in Technical Report
Burnstone Gold Project Pre-feasibility Study Area 1 Executive Summary dated
November 2004.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory
authorities.

Dated this 30th day of March, 2006



/s/ D. van der Heever

|Deon van der
      Heever.      Pr.Sci.Nat.
|-------------------------------------------

---
#### Antoinette JACOB, widow of Joseph Icar Hymel v. TOM ALEXANDER BROKERAGE CO. et al.

No. 60531.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Co. applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist. 348 So.2d 104.

Denied.

MARCUS, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be granted on alleged error of the court of appeal in affirming an award of damages for mental anguish because of damage to property.
#### John R. PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 69-547-69-549.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
269 La. 680

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Samuel DAUPHINE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51624.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 17, 1971.

HAMLIN, J., is of the view that the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that the showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our jurisdiction.

On considering the petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered cause,

It is ordered that the Honorable Bernard J. Bagert, Sr., Judge of Section H of the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, furnish to this Court certified copies of those portions of the record upon which his ruling was founded;

It is further ordered that in the event the respondent judge fails to comply with the aforesaid order on or before September 10, 1971 that a writ of certiorari issue herein directing the trial judge to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of this proceeding and that the trial judge show cause in this Court on October 8, 1971 why the petition of relator should not be granted.
#### Clare P. BIEGER, Appellant, v. Dale Mills CATLETTE, Appellee.

No. 70-188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 18, 1970.

Frederic Stanley, Jr., of Nelson, Stinnett, Surfus, Korp & Payne, Sarasota, for appellant.

David S. Yost, of Cramer, Robinson, Ginsburg & Ross, Sarasota, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Stark v. Vasquez, Fla.1964, 168 So.2d 140, and Hott v. Funk, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 792.

PIERCE, A. C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped by Keeia Richards

Document

Number: 

# 49 ) VI-A- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37

PM Sheet 49 of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-A- 3 Thi s documen t

ha s been move dto IV-D-32 8 a t th e reques t

of th e projec t officer . I t wa s incorrectl y categorize doriginally .
#### James R. MOODY, Appellant, v. Edmund JORDAN and Dolores Jordan, Appellees.

No. 73-293.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12944

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHERMAN LEVON SCOTT, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 4:22-cr-00114-RSB-CLR-2

____________________

USCA11 Case: 23-12944 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 03/19/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12944

Before WILSON, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Katie Brewington, appointed counsel for Sherman Scott in 

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further 

representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the 

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit 

of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion 

to withdraw is GRANTED, and Scott’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 23-12944 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 03/19/2024 Page: 2 of 2
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

November 15, 2016

David P. Wales, Esq.

Jones Day

51 Louisiana Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20001-2113

Re: In the Matter of HeidelbergCement AG and Italcementi S.p.A.

 Docket No. C-4579 

Dear Mr. Wales:

This letter responds to the Application For Approval Of Divestiture Of Martinsburg 

(“Divestiture Application”) filed by Respondents HeidelbergCement AG and Italcementi S.p.A.

on September 18, 2016. The Divestiture Application requests that the Federal Trade 

Commission approve, pursuant to the Order in this matter, Respondents’ proposed divestiture of 

the Martinsburg Cement Business to Argos USA LLC. The Application was placed on the 

public record for comments until October 24, 2016. No comments were received.

After consideration of the proposed divestiture as set forth in Respondents’ Divestiture 

Application, as well as other available information, the Commission has determined to approve 

the proposed divestiture. In according its approval, the Commission has relied upon the 

information submitted and representations made in connection with Respondents’ Divestiture 

Application and has assumed them to be accurate and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
Exhibit 10.28


 


	

    



    

BY FEDERAL EXPRESS	
	 
	March 10, 2014
	 
	H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC
	570 Lexington Avenue
	New York, NY 10022
	Attn: Head of Investment Banking


Dear Sir/Madam:


          Reference
is made to the agreement (the “Agreement”) between Lucid, Inc., d/b/a Caliber Imaging and Diagnostics, (“Caliber”)
and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“HCW”) dated as of August 22, 2013 and as amended on February 20, 2014 and
February 28, 2014. In accordance with Section 1 of the Agreement, Caliber hereby terminates the Agreement. This notice shall be
deemed to be the 6-Month Termination Notice referred to in the Agreement.


 


	 	LUCID, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Richard J. Pulsifer	 
	 	 	Richard J. Pulsifer, Chief Financial Officer
CYBERSECURITY FOR

SMALL BUSINESS

LEARN MORE AT:

FTC.gov/SmallBusiness

RANSOMWARE

Someone in your company 

gets an email.

It looks legitimate — but with one click on 

a link, or one download of an attachment, 

everyone is locked out of your network. That 

link downloaded software that holds your data 

hostage. That’s a ransomware attack.

The attackers ask for money or cryptocurrency, 

but even if you pay, you don’t know if the 

cybercriminals will keep your data or destroy 

your files. Meanwhile, the information you 

need to run your business and sensitive 

details about your customers, employees, 

and company are now in criminal hands. 

Ransomware can take a serious toll on your 

business.

HOW IT

HAPPENS

Criminals can start a ransomware

attack in a variety of ways.

Scam emails

with links and attachments that 

put your data and network at risk. 

These phishing emails make up 

most ransomware attacks.

Server

vulnerabilities

which can be exploited 

by hackers.

Infected websites 

that automatically download 

malicious software onto 

your computer.

Online ads

that contain malicious code 

— even on websites you 

know and trust.
CYBERSECURITY FOR

SMALL BUSINESS

HOW TO PROTECT YOUR BUSINESS

Have a plan 

How would your business stay up and running after a ransomware attack? 

Put this plan in writing and share it with everyone who needs to know.

Back up your data 

Regularly save important files to a drive or server that’s not connected to your network. 

Make data backup part of your routine business operations.

Keep your security up to date

Always install the latest patches and updates. Look for additional means of protection, 

like email authentication, and intrusion prevention software, and set them to update 

automatically on your computer. On mobile devices, you may have to do it manually.

Alert your staff 

Teach them how to avoid phishing scams and show them some of the common ways 

computers and devices become infected. Include tips for spotting and protecting against 

ransomware in your regular orientation and training.

WHAT TO 

DO IF YOU’RE

ATTACKED

Limit the damage

Immediately disconnect 

the infected computers or 

devices from your network. 

If your data has been stolen, 

take steps to protect your 

company and notify those 

who might be affected.

Contact the authorities

Report the attack right away 

to your local FBI office.

Keep your business running 

Now’s the time to implement that plan. 

Having data backed up will help.

Should I pay the ransom?

Law enforcement doesn’t recommend 

that, but it’s up to you to determine 

whether the risks and costs of paying 

are worth the possibility of getting 

your files back. However, paying the 

ransom may not guarantee you get 

your data back.

Notify customers 

If your data or personal information was compromised, make sure you 

notify the affected parties ― they could be at risk of identity theft. Find 

information on how to do that at Data Breach Response: A Guide for 

Business. You can find it at FTC.gov/DataBreach.

LEARN MORE AT:

FTC.gov/SmallBusiness