alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                         MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, (the "Form 10-Q") of Mackinac
Financial Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Paul D. Tobias, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer,
     certify that:

     (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Issuer.


/s/ Paul D. Tobias
-------------------------------------
Paul D. Tobias
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(chief executive officer)
November 14, 2006


                                                                             37.
#### Kelsen Theodore FARRINGTON v. DIRECTOR OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 38271.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
CYBERSECURITY FOR

SMALL BUSINESS

LEARN MORE AT:

FTC.gov/SmallBusiness

VENDOR SECURITY

Your business vendors

may have access to

sensitive information.

Make sure those vendors are securing their own computers 

and networks. For example, what if your accountant, who 

has all your financial data, loses his laptop? Or a vendor 

whose network is connected to yours gets hacked? The 

result: your business data and your customers’ personal 

information may end up in the wrong hands — putting your 

business and your customers at risk. 

HOW TO MONITOR YOUR VENDORS

Put it in writing

Include provisions for security 

in your vendor contracts, like 

a plan to evaluate and update 

security controls, since threats 

change. Make the security 

provisions that are critical to 

your company non-negotiable.

Verify compliance

Establish processes so you 

can confirm that vendors 

follow your rules. Don’t just 

take their word for it.

Make changes as needed

Cybersecurity threats 

change rapidly. Make sure 

your vendors keep their 

security up to date.
CYBERSECURITY FOR

SMALL BUSINESS

HOW TO PROTECT YOUR BUSINESS

Control access

Put controls on databases with sensitive information. Limit access to a need-to-know 

basis, and only for the amount of time a vendor needs to do a job.

Use multi-factor authentication

This makes vendors take additional steps beyond logging in with a password to 

access your network — like a temporary code on a smartphone or a key that’s 

inserted into a computer. 

Secure your network

Require strong passwords: at least 12 characters with a mix of numbers, symbols, and 

both capital and lowercase letters. Never reuse passwords, don’t share them, and 

limit the number of unsuccessful log-in attempts to limit password-guessing attacks.

Safeguard your data

Use properly configured, strong encryption. This protects sensitive information as 

it’s transferred and stored.

WHAT TO DO IF A

VENDOR HAS A

DATA BREACH

Contact the authorities

Report the attack right 

away to your local police 

department. If they’re not 

familiar with investigating 

information compromises, 

contact your local FBI office.

Confirm the vendor

has a fix

Make sure that the vendor 

fixes the vulnerabilities and 

ensures that your information 

will be safe going forward, 

if your business decides to 

continue using the vendor.

Notify customers

If your data or personal information was compromised, 

make sure you notify the affected parties — they could be 

at risk of identity theft. Find information on how to do that 

at Data Breach Response: A Guide for Business. Find it at 

FTC.gov/DataBreach.

LEARN MORE AT:

FTC.gov/SmallBusiness
258 La. 357

#### James GASPARD, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of the Minor, Mattie June Gaspard v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Alvin Bordelon, Sr.

No. 51272.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: James Gaspard, Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of the Minor, Mattie June Gaspard applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Avoyelles. 243 So.2d 839.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
#### Kenneth Winston METCHIK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-455.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 19, 1973.

*270William M. Moran, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Gary M. Carman, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant pleaded guilty to two counts, each charging that he did on separate occasions “unlawfully and feloniously sell, barter, exchange or give a certain drug, to wit: cannabis” in violation of Fla.Stat. § 404.02, F.S.A. He was adjudged guilty of the commission of a felony on each count and sentenced to serve one year in the county jail and eighteen months thereafter on probation.

On this appeal, he urges that he was improperly adjudged guilty of the felonies because under the language of the information he could have been guilty only of possession of the drug and a gift of it to another, and that in the absence of an allegation of the amount of the drug possessed by him, the charges are properly for misdemeanors only. See Collins v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 271 So.2d 156.

We hold that no error is presented because the record clearly shows that appellant bargained a plea to two counts charging felonies.1 The most that can be said against the information is that it might have been subject to an attack for vagueness. Such an attack comes too late after a plea of guilty. Cf. Tracey v. State, Fla. 1961, 130 So.2d 605.

This court, upon examination of the record, noted the illegality of the sentence imposed. A sentence may not be imposed for the maximum term of one year in the county jail and be followed by a period of probation for eighteen months. See Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4), F.S.A.; Hutchins v. State, Fla.App. 3rd 1973, 286 So.2d 244. Cf. Williams v. State, Fla.App.1973, 280 So.2d 518.

We therefore affirm the judgment and modify the. sentence by eliminating the provision for probation.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

1

. The following colloquy between the court and the defendant is representative of the questions asked by the court:

> “The Court: I appreciate your motion. Mr. Metchik, you indicated through your attorney, Mr. Moran, your desire to plead guilty to two counts of sale of marijuana, a *felony*in the State of Florida, is that correct?

> Defendant Metchik: That’s correct.

> The Court: Do you understand each of these counts is a *felony*of which the Court could sentence you to a maximum of five years in the State Penitentiary or a total of 10 years, you understand that?

> Defendant Metchik: Yes, sir.

> The Court: All right, sir.” [Emphasis supplied]
#### In re ESTATE of Ralph R. BAILEY, Deceased.

No. 73-986.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Leroy H. Moe, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7698 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7698

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 810 South Pendleton Street in Easley, South Carolina, as the 
   ``Private First Class Barrett Lyle Austin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2020

 Mr. Duncan (for himself, Mr. Norman, Mr. Rice of South Carolina, Mr. 
Timmons, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Cunningham, and Mr. Clyburn) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 810 South Pendleton Street in Easley, South Carolina, as the 
   ``Private First Class Barrett Lyle Austin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS BARRETT LYLE AUSTIN POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 810 South Pendleton Street in Easley, South Carolina, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Private First Class Barrett Lyle 
Austin Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class Barrett Lyle Austin Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)October17, 2012(Date of earliest event reported)October15, 2012





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





---







Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn October15, 2012, ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. announced they will release their third-quarter 2012 earnings after the market closes on Tuesday, October 30, 2012, and will hold a joint conference call and live webcast at 11 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (10 a.m. Central Daylight Time), Wednesday, October 31, 2012.  The call will also be carried live on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and ExhibitsExhibits99.1  News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated October15, 2012.








2





---







SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:October17,2012By:/s/ Robert F. MartinovichRobert F. MartinovichExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer








3
259 La. 803

#### Albert C. ABADIE v. EMPLOYERS GROUP INSURANCE CO. and Earl Lewis, Sr.

No. 51670.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: Albert C. Abadie, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 250 So.2d 84.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. §1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                January 12, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/                Michael P. Hydanus                        |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |   | Michael                P. Hydanus                            |   |
|                                  |   |   | Interim                President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 26489)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP).                    

*Date:*                         June 19, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Vinod Charles, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6151, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1606,                         *charlesvi@mail.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 31, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-12176 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

March 5, 2013

Ms. Vanessa McClary

State of Texas

Re: In the Matter of Equifax Information Services LLC, File No. 102 3252

Dear Ms. McClary:

Thank you for your comment regarding the Federal Trade Commission’s consent

agreement in the above-entitled proceeding. The Commission has placed your comment on the

public record pursuant to rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. §

4.9(b)(6)(ii), and has given it serious consideration.

The Commission appreciates your support of the proposed settlement. The Commission

is committed to protecting consumers in financial distress as well as safeguarding consumer

privacy and believes that the proposed order with Equifax Information Services LLC will further

this objective. 

Having considered all of the facts of this case and all of the comments submitted in

response to the proposed order, the Commission has determined that the public interest would

best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without any modifications. The

final Decision and Order and other relevant materials are available from the Commission’s 

website at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of

sources in its work. The Commission thanks you again for your comment.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Leibowitz and Commissioner Wright not

participating.

Richard C. Donohue

Acting Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FIRST
MARYLAND BANCORP JUNE 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         982,183
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,356
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,330
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                22,116
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,285,842
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     10,728,714
<ALLOWANCE>                                    157,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,689,048
<DEPOSITS>                                  11,956,861
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,167,003
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            735,843
<LONG-TERM>                                    896,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,224
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        85,395
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,804,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              17,689,048
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                388,873
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              134,446
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,379
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               525,698
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             180,541
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             259,708
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          265,990
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   20,979
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               4,991
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                285,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                126,624
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      79,969
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,969
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.61
<LOANS-NON>                                     54,072
<LOANS-PAST>                                    39,764
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 61,202
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               157,351
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   25,102
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,123
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              157,351
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            77,936
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             20,804
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         58,611


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7476 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report to Congress 

on programs to notify veterans of potential exposure to certain herbicide 

agents outside of Vietnam, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. VELA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a 

report to Congress on programs to notify veterans of 

potential exposure to certain herbicide agents outside 

of Vietnam, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON OUTREACH BY THE SECRETARY OF 

4 VETERANS AFFAIRS REGARDING POTENTIAL 

5 EXPOSURE OF VETERANS TO HERBICIDE 

6 AGENTS. 

7 (a) REPORT REQUIRED.—No later than 180 days 

8 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7476 IH

1 Veterans Affairs shall submit to Congress a report detail2 ing outreach activities regarding the potential exposure of 

3 veterans to certain herbicide agents at sites outside of 

4 Vietnam. 

5 (b) SPANISH LANGUAGE OUTREACH.—The report re6 quired by subsection (a) shall include information on 

7 whether outreach activities are being conducted in Span8 ish. 

9 (c) HERBICIDE AGENT DEFINED.—For the purposes 

10 of this Act, the term ‘‘herbicide agent’’ means a chemical 

11 in an herbicide used or stored by the United States and 

12 allied military forces for the purposes of military oper13 ations or testing during the period starting on May 1, 

14 1945 and ending on June 10, 1977. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS