alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case Number 02-15-00013-CV

IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS at Fort Worth

_

_______________________________________________________________ __

HAROLD A. RUMZEK,

Appellant,

v.

BRYAN D. LUCCHESI,

Appellee.

_

_______________________________________________________________ __

From Cause No. 352-265227-13 in the 352 nd Judicial District Court of Tarrant County

_

_______________________________ ______________________________ ____

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL

_

_______________________________________________________________ __
WALTERS, BALIDO & CRAIN, L.L.P.

Gregory R. Ave State Bar No. 01448900 10440 North Central Expressway Meadow Park Tower, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75231 Telephone Number (214) 347-8310

Facsimile Number (214) 347-8311 Greg.ave@wbclawfirm.com

January 22, 2015 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE ACCEPTED 02-15-00013-CV SECOND COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 1/22/2015 2:47:08 PM DEBRA SPISAK CLERK1 TO THE HONORABLE FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Gregory R. Ave, a part ner in the law firm of Walters,

Balido & Crain, L.L.P., pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

6.1(c), and files this Notice of Appearance and Designation of Lead Counsel

for Appellee Bryan D. Lucchesi. (“Appe llee”). Accordingly, counsel for

Appellee requests the Court take notice and that all correspondence,

notices, briefs, pleadings, motions, orders, opinions, judgments, and other

communications be directed to the undersigned. Pursuant to Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 6.1(c), the following information is being provided

regarding lead counsel:

Gregory R. Ave Texas State Bar No. 01448900 Walters, Balido & Crain, L.L.P. Meadow Park Tower, Suite 1500 10440 North Central Expressway Dallas, Texas 75231 Telephone Number: (214) 347-8310 Facsimile Number: (214) 347-8311 greg.ave@wbclawfirm.com

.2 Respectfully submitted,

WALTERS, BALIDO & CRAIN, L.L.P.

By: /s/ Gregory R. Ave Gregory R. Ave Texas State Bar No. 01448900 greg.ave@wbclawfirm.com 10440 North Central Expressway Meadow Park Tower, Suite 1500 Dallas, Texas 75231 (2l4) 347-8310 (2l4) 347-8311 (facsimile)

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE BRYAN D. LUCCHESI

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On January 22, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent to opposing counsel of record as follows:

Ernest (Skip) Reynolds III, Esquire Via E-serve Law Offices of Ernest (Skip) Reynolds III 314 Main Street, Suite 202 Fort Worth, Texas 76102-7423

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT HAROLD A. RUMZEK

/s/ Gregory R. Ave Gregory R. Ave
#### Willie Frank THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1481.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1973.

Willie Frank Thomas, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES A. CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a. motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
<PAGE> 1

<TABLE>

EXHIBIT 11.1 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS 

<CAPTION>

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



        FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED                   PRIMARY         FULLY DILUTED
                                                 --------------    --------------- 
              SEPTEMBER 30                        1996    1995      1996     1995
------------------------------------------       ------  ------    ------   ------

<S>
EARNINGS:  (In Millions)
                                                <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>
  Net earnings (loss)                            $(17.3) $ 11.0    $(17.3)  $ 11.0 
  Series C preferred dividend requirements          (.6)    (.6)      (.6)
  Series D preferred dividend requirements         (1.6)   (1.6)     (1.6)
  Additional required ESOP contribution <F1>                                   (.5)
                                                  -----   -----     -----    -----

  Net earnings (loss) available for common 
    and equivalent shares                        $(19.5) $  8.8    $(19.5)  $ 10.5 
                                                  =====   =====     =====    =====


WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:  (In Millions)

  Common shares outstanding                        35.1    35.0      35.1     35.0
  Conversion of Series C preferred stock <F3>                                  1.9
  Contingent issuance of common stock to
    satisfy the redemption price guarantee <F2><F4>                             .6
  Conversion of Series D preferred stock <F3>                                  4.4
                                                  -----   -----     -----    -----

  Common and equivalent shares outstanding         35.1    35.0      35.1     41.9
                                                  =====   =====     =====    =====


PER COMMON AND EQUIVALENT SHARE:

   Net (loss) earnings                           $ (.56) $  .25    $ (.56)  $  .25
                                                  =====   =====     =====    =====

</TABLE>

[FN]
<F1> Amount represents the additional after-tax contribution that would be 
     necessary to meet the ESOP debt service requirements under an assumed 
     conversion of the Series C preferred stock.

<F2> Calculations consider the September 27, 1996 common stock market price in 
     accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Abstract No. 89-12.

<F3> Amount represents the weighted average number of common shares issued 
     assuming conversion of preferred stock outstanding.

<F4> Amount represents the additional number of common shares that would be 
     issued in order to satisfy the Series C preferred stock redemption price 
     guarantee.  This calculation considers only the number of preferred shares
     held by the ESOP that have been allocated to participants' accounts as of 
     September 30 of the respective year.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8939-8940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ES97-13-001]


South Carolina Electric & Gas Company; Notice of Amended 
Application

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 13, 1997, South Carolina Electric & 
Gas Company (SCG&E) filed an amendment to its application in Docket No. 
ES97-13-000, under Sec. 204 of the Federal Power Act. By letter dated 
December 26, 1997, (77 FERC para. 61,198), SCG&E was authorized to 
issue unsecured short-term notes, from time to time, in an aggregate 
principal amount of not more than $200 million outstanding at any one 
time during the period January 1, 1997 through December 31, 1998 with a 
final maturity date no later than 12 months from the date of issuance. 
SCG&E now requests that the authorization be amended to raise the limit 
on short-term borrowings from $200 million to $250 million.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before February 27, 1997. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make the

[[Page 8940]]

protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4807 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 99.2


                                 PRESS RELEASE

                    CHELSEA OIL AND GAS LTD. (OTCBB: COGLF)

                  CHELSEA OTCBB TICKER SYMBOL CHANGED TO COGLF

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

CALGARY, AB, CANADA, OCTOBER 7, 2013 - Chelsea Oil and Gas Ltd. (formerly
Australian-Canadian Oil Royalties Ltd.) (OTCBB: COGLF) ("Chelsea" or "the
Company") announces that in conjunction with the corporate name change and
merger with International TME Resources Inc. that was completed on October 2,
2013, our OTC symbol will be changed from AUCAF to COGLF effective October 7,
2013. This change does not affect any shares held.

We seek safe harbor.


About Chelsea

Chelsea Oil and Gas Ltd. is a junior oil and gas exploration and production
company with assets in Australia. The Company has holds working interests in
more than 6 million acres in the Georgina, Simpson, Surat and Cooper-Eromanga
basins onshore Australia. In addition, the Company holds overriding royalty
interests in more than 12 million acres in several basins in Australia both
onshore and offshore. The Company is committed to growing shareholder value
through the application of proven North American completion and enhanced
recovery technologies including horizontal drilling, mutli-stage fracture
stimulations, and waterflooding to its large, operated resource base.

For further information on Chelsea, please visit our website at
www.chelseaoilandgas.com, or call:

+1-403-457-1959 (Office)
+1-800-290-8342 (Toll Free in the United States)
#### Lewis Russell LAUCK, Appellant, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-893.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 7, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Order entered April 20, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01508-CV

SUSAN C. SERVIN, Appellant

V.

STEVE SERVIN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02365-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee Steve Servin’s unopposed motion for an extension of time in 

which to file appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on or before 

April 26, 2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
REGULATORY EVA UAnON

Directorate Identifier: 2009-NM-260-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES () explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a Slbstantial number ofsmal] entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect mtrastate aviation in AJaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where avdtion might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7654 

To require the Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 

to submit reports regarding coronavirus testing data. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2020 

Mr. RICHMOND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and 

Human Services to submit reports regarding coronavirus 

testing data. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID Testing Trans5 parency Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DATA SHARING. 

7 Not later than 14 days after the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, and daily thereafter, the Secretary of Health 

9 and Human Services shall submit to the Committee on 

10 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7654 IH

1 and the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

2 and Pensions, and make publicly available online, any data 

3 submitted to the Secretary pursuant to section 18115 of 

4 the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# **Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

 

 

I, Howard R.Levine, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Family DollarStores, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

•                  the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended November 29, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  January 8, 2004

 

 
| /s/    | Howard R.  Levine                                  |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Howard R.  Levine                                  |
|   | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                     |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and will be retained by FamilyDollar Stores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
#### North Shore Railroad Company *v.*The Pennsylvania Company, Appellant

(Nos. 1 and 2).

*Appeals*— Preliminary *injunctions*— Practice—Supreme *Court.*

On an appeal from decrees continuing preliminary injunctions until further orders of the court, where apparently there was sufficient ground for the action of the court, the Supreme Court will not depart from the established practice not to consider the merits until the cases are presented after final hearing in the common pleas.

Argued Feb. 6, 1911.

Appeals, Nos. 35 and 36, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Beaver Co., in *308equity, Sept. T., 191Q, Nos. 2 and 3, continuing preliminary injunction in case of North Shore Railroad Company v. The Pennsylvania Company, leasing and operating The Pittsburg, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway.

April 10, 1911:

Before Fell, C. J., Brown, Mestrezat, Potter, Elkin, Stewart and Moschzisker, JJ.

Affirmed.

Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Holt, P. J.

The nature of appeal appears by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

*W. A. McConnel,*for appellant.

*Arthur E. Barnett*and *James L. Hogan,*for appellee.

Per Curiam,

These appeals are from decrees continuing, until further order of the court, preliminary injunctions restraining the defendant from interfering with the connection of the tracks of the plaintiff’s road with its own and from entering on the plaintiff’s right of way. They relate to the same subject-matter and were argued together. Apparently there was sufficient ground for the action of the court in awarding the ínjúnction and there is no reason why this court should depart from the established practice not to consider the merits until the cases are presented after final hearing in the common pleas.

The appeals are dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0387

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MARGO ALLISON STURTS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 20, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 10 2020

03/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0387
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, (the "Form 10-Q") of North Country
Financial Corporation (the "Issuer").

     I, Joseph E. Petterson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
     Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

     (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Issuer.

Joseph E. Petterson
----------------------------------------------------
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(chief financial officer)
May 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                       

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          48,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,224,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                   435,612
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,315,818
<PP&E>                                         227,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                  85,554
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,564,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,246,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     23,390
<COMMON>                                         3,072
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,107,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,564,995
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,420,871
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,715,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               400,133
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,465
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (945,862)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (945,862)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (945,862)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.67)






















        

</TABLE>
SCWC-13-0005232

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, 

vs.

BYRON D. CHEEK-ENRIQUES, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0005232; CASE NO. 1DTA-11-05193)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Byron D. CheekEnriques’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August 

1, 2015, is hereby accepted without oral argument. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be 

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days pursuant to

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0005232

15-SEP-2015

09:38 AM
2

Rule 34(c) of the Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for 

retention of oral argument. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, September 15, 2015.

Jonathan Burge

for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 October 5, 2007

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



<PAGE>

Item 8.01   Other Events
---------   ------------
On October 5, 2007 The Board of Directors of the John Hancock Financial Trends
Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") announced that Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc.
will assume responsibilities as adviser and administrator to the Fund effective
on or about December 1, 2007.  A copy of the joint press release dated
October 5, 2007 issued by the Fund and John Hancock Advisers, LLC is filed
herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits
---------   ---------------------------------

(d)  Exhibits

     99.1        Press release issued by the John Hancock Financial Trends
		 Fund, Inc. and John Hancock Advisers, LLC dated August 9, 2007.



                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: October 9, 2007                           By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary