alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
^
                                  Diamond Hill
                                  ------------
                             Investment Group, Inc.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
                                             Investor Contact:
                                             James F. Laird
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             614-255-3353
                                             E-mail: (jlaird@diamond-hill.com)

                      DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.
          ANNOUNCES UNAUDITED RESULTS FOR QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2004

     Columbus,  Ohio -- May 14, 2004, -- Diamond Hill  Investment  Group,
Inc. (NASDAQ:DHIL) today reported unaudited results for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004.  Assets under management increased by 137% to $302 million
compared to March 31, 2003 and investment management fees increased by 125%
compared to the first quarter of 2003.  The net operating loss for the quarter
was $181,000, a 60% improvement compared to a loss of $448,000 in the first
quarter of 2003.  The net loss for the quarter was $80,000 or 5 cents per
share, down over 80% from the first quarter of 2003 when the net loss was
$503,000 or 36 cents per share.

     Ric Dillon, president and chief investment officer stated, "We have
continued to produce excellent investment returns for our clients, which is
our primary objective.  In addition, our efforts to market our investment
services have resulted in $42 million in new investments in our managed
accounts and mutual funds in the first quarter of 2004.  We will maintain our
focus on serving our clients' investment needs, and we expect to have
continued success in growing our business in the future."  The Company re-
affirmed a previously announced stock buyback program under which up to
400,000 shares of stock may be purchased for treasury, approximately 50,000
shares remain which may be purchased under the program.

About Diamond Hill:

     Diamond Hill provides investment management services to individuals and
institutions seeking to preserve and build wealth.  The firm currently manages
mutual funds, seperate accounts and a private investment fund.  For more
information on Diamond Hill, visit www.diamond-hill.com.



                                     ###

            375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio 43215
                         614-255-3333  fax 614-255-3363
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00571-CR

Ronald Paul Parks Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1330306D)

August 21, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1110 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1110 Filed 01/13/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1110 Filed 01/13/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1110 Filed 01/13/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1110 Filed 01/13/21 Page 5 of 5
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CESAR MUNOZ GONZALEZ, AKA 

Blanco, AKA "B",

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 23-1138

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00567-RGK-2

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 21, 2024**

Before: FERNANDEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Munoz Gonzalez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying 

his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We 

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, see

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-1138

United States v. Aruda, 993 F.3d 797, 799 (9th Cir. 2021), we affirm.

Gonzalez contends that the district court erred by failing to recognize its 

authority to reduce his sentence even if it did not grant him immediate release. 

The record demonstrates that the district court adequately responded to the 

arguments Gonzalez presented and does not suggest the court misunderstood the 

scope of its discretion under § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). See Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 

639, 653 (1990) (“Trial judges are presumed to know the law and to apply it in 

making their decisions.”), overruled on other grounds by Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 

584, 609 (2002). Moreover, the district court did not abuse its discretion by 

concluding that Gonzalez had not demonstrated extraordinary and compelling 

reasons for relief. See United States v. Robertson, 895 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 

2018) (a district court abuses its discretion only if its decision is illogical, 

implausible, or without support in the record).

AFFIRMED.
#### Carmela PRECANICO, Petitioner, v. The LOVABLE COMPANY et al., Respondents.

No. 39918.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 25, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY and Leo R. Edgerton, Petitioners, v. Willie Mae MILLER and William D. Miller, Respondents.

No. 39824.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 235 So.2d 33.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
WINTHROP
REALTY TRUST
 FORM
10-Q MARCH 31, 2009
 Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust (“the Company”) for the ninemonths endedMarch 31, 2009as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C. Staples, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and





(2)
            the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of theCompany.




By:
              /s/Thomas C.
      StaplesName:
              Thomas C.
      StaplesChief Financial
      Officer




May 11, 2009
#### In the Interest of H. M. E., a Child, Juvenile Case No. 28-131-B.

No. 69-182.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Improvements Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center 
Improvements Project Committee will conduct an open meeting and will 
solicit public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 17, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilbert Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(737) 800-4060.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance 
Center Improvements Project Committee will be held Tuesday, July 17, 
2018, at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Gilbert Martinez. For more information please contact Gilbert 
Martinez at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6523, or write TAP Office, 3651 S 
IH-35, STOP 1005 AUSC, Austin, TX 78741, or post comments to the 
website: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The committee will be discussing various issues related to the 
Taxpayer Assistance Centers and public input is welcomed.

    Dated: June 1, 2018.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-12208 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,365
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              32
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   867
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   696
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     13,709
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             760
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               745
<LOANS>                                         84,200
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,492
<DEPOSITS>                                      76,964
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,926
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,780
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,972
<COMMON>                                           184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,908
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,758
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 115,492
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,955
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  584
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   145
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,684
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,259
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,974
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,710
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      668
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  32
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,033
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    647
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         398
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       398
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.67
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.47
<LOANS-NON>                                        396
<LOANS-PAST>                                       494
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     1
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,198
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      698
<RECOVERIES>                                       157
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,362
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,362
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)August 20, 2013(Date of earliest event reported)August 19, 2013





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn August 19, 2013, we announced we will participate in the Citi One-on-One Master Limited Partnership/Midstream Infrastructure Conference on Wednesday and Thursday, August 21-22, 2013, in Las Vegas, Nevada.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on the ONEOK Partners website,www.oneokpartners.com, on Wednesday, August 21, at 5 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated August 19, 2013.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:August 20, 2013By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1(d)News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated August 19, 2013.











4
AMENDMENT TO AIR-FILLED CUSHION ANASTHESIA MASK
                                SUPPLY AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT TO AIR-FILLED CUSHION ANASTHESIA MASK SUPPLY AGREEMENT (this
"Amendment")  is made  this ____ day of  September,  1999 by and  between  Vital
Signs, Inc., a New Jersey corporation with an address at 20 Campus Road, Totowa,
New Jersey 07512 ("VSI") and Respironics,  Inc., a Delaware  corporation with an
address at 1501 Ardmore Boulevard, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15221 ("RI").

                                    Recitals

     A. VSI and RI are parties to that certain  Letter  Agreement  dated July 2,
1980 and that certain Supply Agreement dated June 30, 1993 and amended on August
31, 1993 and May 17, 1995 (collectively, the "Supply Agreement").

     B. VSI and RI desire to extend the term of the Supply Agreement.

     NOW THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set
forth herein, and intending to be legally bound, VSI and RI agree as follows:

     1. Term of Supply  Agreement.  The Supply  Agreement  is hereby  amended to
provide  that the term of the Supply  Agreement  shall be extended and shall run
through  June 30,  2006.  Unless VSI or RI  notifies  the other party in writing
prior to January 1, 2006 of its intent to terminate the Supply Agreement on June
30, 2006, the Supply Agreement shall automatically be extended for an additional
five (5) year period commencing July 1, 2006 and ending June 30, 2011.

     2. Ratification. Except as amended hereby, the Supply Agreement is ratified
and confirmed in all respects.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  VSI and RI have executed this Amendment as of the date
first written above.

VITAL SIGNS, INC.                                         RESPIRONICS, INC.

By:                                         By:
    --------------------------------            --------------------------------


Name:                                       Name:
      ------------------------------              ------------------------------


Title:                                      Title:
       -----------------------------               -----------------------------
#### Kenneth WALKER, Appellant, v. Wallace BECKETT, Appellee.

No. 70-466.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1971.

Cornell & Lanza, and John A. O’Conner, Miami, for appellant.

Edward P. Swan, and Charnelle H. Summers, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Lykes Brothers, Inc. v. Singletary, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 589, 591.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Union Real Estate Equity
and Mortgage Investments (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2002                        /s/  Neil H. Koenig
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Neil H. Koenig
                                               Principal Executive Officer


Date: November 14, 2002                        /s/ Neil H. Koenig
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Neil H. Koenig
                                               Interim Chief Financial Officer


                                       29
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2299

ROBERT W. RIFE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHMOND TECHNICAL CENTER; J. AUSTIN BROWN,

Principal; DAVID NETTLES, Assistant Principal;

JOSEPH FRICHTEL, Assistant Principal; JOHNNIE

RICH, Principal (retired),

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-909)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert W. Rife, Appellant Pro Se. Cynthia Eppes Hudson, Kimberly

Stewart Hugo, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, L.L.P., Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting

summary judgment to Defendants on his employment discrimination

complaint and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Rife v. Richmond Technical

Ctr., No. CA-94-909 (E.D. Va. May 3 & 23, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Sheinberg, Samuel I.

From:

Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 4:20 PM

To: Walsh, Kathryn E,; Berg, Karen E.; Sheinberg, Samuel |.; Six, Anne; Whitehead, Nora
Subject: FW: 802.50 question regarding insurance policies

; . as = regarding insurance policies

We agree with your conclusion.

From:

Sent: Thursday, May 13, 708: -05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
a

Subject: -2U0 question regarding insurance policies

Buyer is acquiring a US holding company (X) that owns several non-US insurance companies that provide various types
of coverage around the world. Y, one of the insurance company subsidiaries of X that is domiciled outside the US, issues
insurance policies to plan sponsors and insureds located in the US and elsewhere, pursuant to an insurance license in its
country of domicile. Y has one employee located in the country where it is domiciled.

Support functions for Y’s Americas business (such as sales and account management) are administered by US-based
personnel employed by X and its affiliates. The “Americas” business includes policies with customers that are plan
sponsors based in the US with members that claim outside the US, as well as customers that are plan sponsors based
outside the US with members that claim in the US.

Y also has a “non-Americas” business that includes certain policies providing non-US members with coverage for
treatment received in the US, but more generally provides coverage outside the US. There are some support functions
supporting the “non-Americas” business (such as digital website management and IT) that are provided by US-based
personnel employed by X and its affiliates, but such personnel are not directly involved in negotiating/executing policies
for Y.

We believe, that for purposes of carrying out the 802.4/802.50 analysis, that the types of policies described above (all
written outside the US but with some US aspects) would not be considered US assets. If the policies are treated as
foreign assets because they are written outside the US, we believe that the revenues generated from these policies (i.e.,
premiums) should not be considered sales into the US. Do you agree?
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-30655, 333-74747, 333-74715, 333-78521, 333-78567, 333-83725 and
333-35806 of THQ Inc. on Forms S-8 and Registration Statements No. 333-32221,
333-60277, 333-70335, 333-85269, 333-92361 and 333-32526 on Forms S-3 of our
report dated February 24, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
of THQ Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
----------------------------
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 28, 2000