alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: sshuput@hotmail.com 

To: nick@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Re Docket ID:EPA-HQ-2010-0505 

Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:56:43 -0600 

Mr. Nick Parsons 

Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/CCGEPA Denver (Region 8) 

In Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505 

Dear Mr Parsons, 

Air Quality is already bad enough on the Wasatch front where I live. We don't need more oil drilling with the 

consequent rise in grenhouse gas emissions. We need clean energy instead. The health of our people is clearly at 

stake. Don't allow more drilling on the Colorado Plateau to increase our air pollution. 

Stephen R Shuput MD 

FW: Re Docket ID:EPA-HQ-2010-0505

Stephen Shuput 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/02/2010 12:03 PM 

Show Details 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web5808.h... 8/9/2010
#### Bessie M. COXEY, a widow, Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HOLLYWOOD, Lawrence Ruben and Jacob Morrow, doing business as Rochelle Realty Co., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 69-578.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Sept. 16, 1969.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George W. Tedder, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### October 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



### 136687 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
J ustices



### v SC: 136687 COA: 282209 Grand Traverse CC: 07-010391-FH BOBBY WAYNE HODGES, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 6, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

1015 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 22, 2008

Clerk
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
                             ----------------------

         The Agreement dated as of February 1, 1997 between Mr. Rajiv Vohra (the
"Advisor")  and Packaging  Plus Services,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  as amended on
March 14, 1997, April 24, 1997 and August 27, 1997, is hereby further amended as
follows:

         Paragraph 2 of the Agreement, is amended to read:

         "2.  Except as otherwise  specified  herein,  this  Agreement  shall be
         effective  for five years from the date hereof,  until it is terminated
         by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice received by either
         the Advisor or the Company."

         Paragraph 4(b) of the Agreement, is amended, in part, to read:

         "4.      In consideration  for the services  rendered by the Advisor to
                  the Company  pursuant  to this  Agreement,  the Company  shall
                  compensate the Advisor as follows:

         "(b)     The Company grants to the Advisor common shares of the Company
                  at the rate of 60,000 shares per month, for the thirty seventh
                  through the sixtieth month of the term of this Agreement, or a
                  total of  1,440,000  shares  for the  twenty  four  additional
                  months of the extended term hereof.  The total amount of these
                  Shares may be  transferred  to the Advisor,  in advance at any
                  time, in whole or in part."


         All other terms and conditions of the Agreement continue in effect.

Dated: January 23, 1998


                                                 /s/ Rajiv Vohra
                                                 -------------------
                                                 Rajiv Vohra

PACKAGING PLUS SERVICES, INC.



By:      /s/ Richard A. Altomare
         -------------------------
         Richard A. Altomare
         President and CEO
#### SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, v. Tammie THOMPSON, a minor, by her next friend and father, Rex Thompson, and Rex Thompson, Individually, Respondents.

No. 43172.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 28, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 268 So.2d 185.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                   1,243,942,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      75,492,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            49,089,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            24,447,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              5,489,283,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   3,480,541,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     3,494,231,000
<LOANS>                                 25,540,236,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                330,151,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          38,613,132,000
<DEPOSITS>                              29,131,051,000
<SHORT-TERM>                             5,498,139,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        360,885,000
<LONG-TERM>                                497,430,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   139,944,000
<OTHER-SE>                               2,985,683,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          38,613,132,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            523,847,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          131,560,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            22,403,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           677,810,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         257,455,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         323,844,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      353,966,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               20,738,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              16,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            262,575,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            213,768,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 213,768,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               136,486,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.23
<LOANS-NON>                                152,630,000
<LOANS-PAST>                               121,393,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             5,084,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           315,412,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               20,082,000
<RECOVERIES>                                 8,549,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          330,151,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       330,151,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    330,151,000
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000865936
<NAME>    PAINEWEBBER R&D PARTNERS III, L.P.

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                 6,846,730
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,866,129
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,866,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,844
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,786,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,866,129
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,926,324
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               164,177
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,762,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,762,147
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7870 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7870

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2020

 Mr. Foster (for himself and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill; 
      which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, as the ``Lawrence 
                  M. `Larry' Walsh Sr. Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAWRENCE M. ``LARRY'' WALSH SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 303 East Mississippi Avenue in Elwood, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lawrence M. `Larry' Sr. Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence 
M. `Larry' Sr. Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,064,284
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,238
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               104,425
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               109,577
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  5,082,250
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,016,704
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           964,270
<LOANS>                                     11,587,327
<ALLOWANCE>                                    189,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,064,152
<DEPOSITS>                                  14,445,748
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,864,933
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            483,179
<LONG-TERM>                                    610,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       282,239
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,377,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              20,064,152
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                510,400
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              157,473
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,615
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               673,488
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             237,221
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             310,592
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          362,896
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   13,275
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,151
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                443,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                139,882
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     139,882
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,034
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.31
<LOANS-NON>                                     45,728
<LOANS-PAST>                                    32,223
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  5,842
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               187,880
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   28,570
<RECOVERIES>                                    15,377
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              189,279
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           124,394
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         64,885


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-30256

Summary Calendar

PHILLIS CONE, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

DG LOUISIANA, L.L.C., incorrectly captioned Dollar General Corporation, 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:18-CV-1247

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Phillis Cone brought this action against Dollar General for injuries 

allegedly sustained during a slip-and-fall in the potato chip aisle at a Dollar 

General store in Bush, Louisiana. The district court granted summary 

judgment for Dollar General and Cone appealed. We affirm for essentially the 

reasons stated by the district court.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 12, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-30256 Document: 00515115385 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2019
Docket Number FAA-2013-0833
#### Frank A. ANASTASIA, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43180.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 24, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12302]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than July 2, 2018.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (David L. Hubbard, Senior 
Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034. Comments can 
also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0f3dfddddd5dec4c39ed1c0c0dcd9d3d1c4d9dfdec3f0c3c4dcc39ed6c2d29edfc2d7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a193537373f342e29743b2a2a3633393b2e333534291a292e3629743c28387435283d">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Stifel Financial Corp., St. Louis, Missouri; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Business Bancshares, Inc., St. Louis, 
Missouri, and thereby indirectly acquire The Business Bank, Clayton, 
Missouri.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, June 4, 2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018-12302 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San A ntonio, Texas** 

January 29, 2015

N o. 04

- 02

- 00864

- CR

Mario Limone SAUCEDO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Menard County, Texas

Trial Court No. 02

- 1892

Honorable Emil Karl Prohl, Judge Presiding



### O R DER

The Appellant’s Amended Motion to File for Rehearing is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on the 29 th day of January , 201 5

.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

.
Deputy General Counsel for Opinions 

and Analysis

William Cohen

Associate General Counsel for 

Ethics

Lorielle Pankey

Deputy General Counsel for 

Legal Counsel

Kathleen Daffan (Acting)

Associate General Counsel for 

Energy

John H. Seesel

Deputy General Counsel for 

Litigation

Mariel Goetz (Acting)

Assistant General Counsel

(Trial Court)

Michele Arington

Assistant General Counsel

Josephine Liu

Assistant General Counsel 

(FOIA)

Burke Kappler (Acting)

Federal Trade Commission

Office of the General Counsel

Chief of Staff

Burke Kappler

General Counsel

Anisha Dasgupta Counsel to the General 

Counsel

Robin Moore

Principal Deputy General Counsel

[Vacant]
#### Joan M. KINGSBURY and Citizens Commercial and Savings Bank, a Michigan banking corporation as testamentary trustees under the Last Will and Testament of Joseph B. Kingsbury, Deceased, Appellants, v. Florence M. SCHACHT and Evelyn A. Nyman, Appellees.

No. 69-555.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; William G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Werner ROSKE, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1067.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 3, 1971.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Jeffrey H. Barker, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Richardson v. State, Fla. 1971, 247 So.2d 296.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Slip Op. 06 - 70

 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

SERGIO U. RETAMAL, 

 :

 Plaintiff, 

 :

 v. Court No. 03-00613 

 :

U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, :

 Defendant. : 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

 Memorandum & Order 

 Dated: May 11, 2006

AQUILINO, Senior Judge: Pursuant to this court's slip

opinion 04-149, 28 CIT (Nov. 24, 2004), final judgment was

entered, dismissing this action. Upon subsequent denial of a motion for rehearing per slip opinion 05-15, 29 CIT (Feb. 3, 

2005), the originally-pro-se plaintiff's adoptive counsel prosecuted an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit, which handed down a decision that concluded:

The judgment of the United States Court of International Trade is vacated in part, reversed in part, and

the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss.

Sergio U. Retamal & John J. Galvin v. U.S. Customs & Border Protection, 439 F.3d 1372, 1378 (Fed.Cir. 2006).

That court's judgment issued as a mandate on April 27,

2006 to the foregoing effect causes this court to reaffirm that all
Court No. 03-00613 Page 2

that its judgment did on November 24, 2004 was to do what the

appellate remand now seemingly requires, to wit, dismiss this

action. 

Ergo, it is once again so ordered.

Dated: New York, New York

 May 11, 2006

 Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. 

 Senior Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                         184,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      58,658,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,633,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,494,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     23,478,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,314,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     834,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,494,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,886,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (2,010,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (163,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                713,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   710,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
        

</TABLE>
#### MARGATE M. C., INC., and A. I. D., Inc., Appellants, v. MARGATE HEALTH CENTER, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-90.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.