alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jeno F. PAULUCCI, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 73-786.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

William D. Jones, Jr., Jones, Foerster & Hodge, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

H. Rex Owen and R. W. Neiser, St. Pe-tersburg, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs, record, and oral argument of counsel, it has not been made to appear that the lower court departed from the essential requirements of law. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari and petitioner’s application for attorneys’ fees are denied.

OWEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and PAUL, MAURICE, Associate Judge, concur.
---

April 9th, 2007

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the
      "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 
|    | Consent of Expert                          

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) to
be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual
Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

On behalf of Turgis Consulting (Pty) Ltd. (Turgis), I hereby
consent to the use of my name and Turgis name in connection with reference to
my and Turgis involvement in the preparation of a technical report entitled
Technical Report on the Feasibility Study for the Burnstone Gold Project (the
"Technical Report") and to references to the Technical Report, or portions
thereof, in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual
Report.

Yours truly,

Turgis Consulting (Pty) Ltd.

/s/ A.D. Pooley

A. D. Pooley

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,475
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               8
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   517
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   874
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     13,948
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             723
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               737
<LOANS>                                         82,741
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,127
<DEPOSITS>                                      75,782
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,657
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,227
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,928
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 113,127
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,075
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  833
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   163
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,071
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,907
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,998
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,074
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      939
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  43
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,307
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         831
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       831
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.44
<LOANS-NON>                                        428
<LOANS-PAST>                                       641
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     1
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,198
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,061
<RECOVERIES>                                       231
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,344
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,344
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                     1,477,177
<SECURITIES>               0
<RECEIVABLES>              5,675,765
<ALLOWANCES>                 279,906
<INVENTORY>                5,050,194
<CURRENT-ASSETS>          14,445,491 
<PP&E>                    72,254,014 
<DEPRECIATION>            31,938,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>            81,631,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>     10,291,917
<BONDS>                   24,556,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>      0
<PREFERRED>                0
<COMMON>                   1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                41,089,275 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>81,631,302
<SALES>                   11,272,970
<TOTAL-REVENUES>          22,138,772
<CGS>                     10,449,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>             11,331,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>          30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>         1,688,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>           (1,359,984)
<INCOME-TAX>                 209,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         (950,770)
<DISCONTINUED>             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>            0
<CHANGES>                  0
<NET-INCOME>                (950,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  (1.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                  (1.41)
        

</TABLE>
SCPW-20-0000772

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

IN RE CHRIS SLAVICK, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Chris Slavick’s

petition for writ of mandamus, filed on December 28, 2020, it

appears that, based on the record before this court, petitioner

fails to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right

to relief and that he lacks alternative means to seek relief. 

Petitioner, therefore, is not entitled to the requested

extraordinary writ. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982

P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary

remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a

clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative

means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the

requested action). Accordingly,

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000772

07-JAN-2021

12:23 PM

Dkt. 8 ODDP
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus

without payment of the filing fee.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 7, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE MONTH ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         267,439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,729,526
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,310,931)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,584,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,984,436
<PP&E>                                      67,162,307
<DEPRECIATION>                            (23,147,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,269,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,937,324
<BONDS>                                     19,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,834,445
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,998,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,269,868
<SALES>                                     10,495,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,741,173
<CGS>                                        5,644,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,951,558
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               347,341
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             414,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                730,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                    42,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   341,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
V 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7807 

For the relief of Rebecca Trimble. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2020 

Mr. YOUNG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Rebecca Trimble. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR REBECCA 

4 TRIMBLE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Rebecca Trimble shall be eligible for 

8 the issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 

9 status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent 

10 residence upon filing an application for issuance of an im11 migrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 

2 

•HR 7807 IH

1 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 

2 resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Rebecca Trimble 

4 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci5 fied in subsection (c), Rebecca Trimble shall be considered 

6 to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be eligible 

7 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi8 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub11 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

12 issuance of immigrant visas or the application for adjust13 ment of status are filed with appropriate fees within two 

14 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

16 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi17 dence to Rebecca Trimble, the Secretary of State shall in18 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur19 rent or next following fiscal year— 

20 (1) the total number of immigrant visas that 

21 are made available to natives of the country of birth 

22 of Rebecca Trimble under section 203(a) of the Im23 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)); 

24 or 

3 

•HR 7807 IH

1 (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

2 visas that are made available to natives of the coun3 try of birth of Rebecca Trimble under section 202(e) 

4 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

Æ
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to November 17, 2020)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-20-027 State v. Cain

A-20-272,

A-20-273 In re Interest of Halo D. & Hadlee D.

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
#### Charley Curtis WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-357.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 16, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and John W. Watson, III, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joseph W. DeMember, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694; Lindsey v. State, 66 Fla. 341, 63 So. 832.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Sh inberg, Samuel I.

From: Sheinberg, Samuel |.

Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 4:32 PM
To:

Ce:

Subject: RE: Application of 7A(c)(10)

We agree that 7A(c)(10) applies to Investor 1.
Have a good weekend.

Sam

Dear PNO Team,

We are looking at a scenario in which Issuer is raising capital through issuing new voting securities to multiple investors,
all of which executed a single purchase agreement. One investor (Investor 1) is a current non-controlling shareholder,
holding 2% of the outstanding voting interests, that has a right to participate up to pro rata in this financing to avoid
dilution, but has decided to invest slightly less than its pro rata share. After closing, Investor 1 will hold voting securities
with an aggregate value exceeding the size of transaction, but its percentage of outstanding voting securities will
decrease to 1.9% as a result of the dilution from the other investors’ acquisitions of the new securities. Unlike the other
investors, however, Investor 1 has a contribution-call requirement that results in its closing being slightly delayed in
relation to the other investors. When the other investors close prior to Investor 1, Investor 1’s shares will be
temporarily diluted to 1.8% of the outstanding voting securities of Issuer. Then, about 2 weeks after the other investors
close, Investor 1 will close. Thus, because of Investor 1’s administrative governance issue causing a delay, its percentage
of outstanding voting interests of Issuer will temporarily decrease .2% and then rise .1%, which is still less than its
current holding after closing.

One Informal Opinion appears to address whether 7A(c)(10) can apply to a temporary increase of percentages held by
investors that closed in advance of an investor with a delayed closing (see 1903001); however, we do not think the PNO
has addressed the situation as described for Investor 1: where at all times, Investor 1 will hold less than it currently
holds, but because of an administrative issue (the contribution-call requirements), its percentage will first temporarily
decrease .2% and then rise .1%, which will still be below its current holding. The text of 7A(c)(10) seems to substantively
address just this situation (i.e., the acquisition of voting securities with no per centum increase to avoid dilution). Can
the PNO confirm whether 7A(c)(10) is available?
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 27, 2007:

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Del Global  Technologies  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 27, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James
A.  Risher,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350,  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 that to my knowledge:

   (1) The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
       Section 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
       amended; and

   (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
       Company.

                                          /s/ James A. Risher
                                          -------------------------
                                          Name: James A. Risher
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          Date: February 28, 2007

   (1) A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
       been provided to Del Global Technologies Corp and will be retained by Del
       Global  Technologies  Corp.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
       Commission or its staff upon request.

       The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18
       U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
       separate disclosure document.
```
Exhibit 99.3



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United
States Code § 1350 and

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



The Undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report of Federal-Mogul
Corporation (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  August 4, 2003



By:

/s/ Charles G. McClureCharles G. McClureChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ G. Michael LynchG. Michael LynchChief Financial Officer




49
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,528-01

EX P ARTE ISAAC GU TIERREZ, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1514075-A IN THE 178 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Ap plicant was convicted of super ag g rava ted sexual assault and sentenc ed to forty y ea rs ’ imprisonment. The Four

teenth Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Gutierrez v. State , 14-18- 00404-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [14 ] J une 8, 2 0 20)(not desig nated for publication). Applicant t h filed t his application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the dis t ri ct clerk forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffe ctive beca use he failed to investiga te and call witnesses, failed to investiga te and challeng e the qualifica tions of the police office r who translated Applicant’s statement to police fro m S p an i s h t o Eng lish, and failed to file a motion to limit the introduction of prior ba d acts. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts tha t, if true, might entitle him to relief.2

Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial c ourt shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the

rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I t appea rs that Appl icant is repr esente d by counse l

. I f Ap p licant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined , t h e trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and Applicant was prejudic ed

. T h e t rial court may make any other finding s and conc lusions that it deems a ppropriate in response to Applica nt’s claims. The trial court shall make fi ndings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclus ions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court. Filed: Mar ch 2, 2022 Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7072-7073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 97-016]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that AirFlow Catalyst Systems, Inc., 
11 State Street, Suite 203, Pittsford, New York 14534, has applied for 
a partially exclusive license to practice the inventions described and 
claimed in U.S. Patent No. 4,829,035, entitled ``REACTIVATION OF A TIN 
OXIDE-CONTAINING CATALYST,'' U.S. Patent NO. 4,855,274, entitled 
``PROCESS OF MAKING NOBLE METAL ON TIN OXIDE CATALYST,'' U.S. Patent 
No. 4,912,082, entitled ``CATALYST FOR CARBON MONOXIDE OXIDATION,'' 
U.S. Patent No. 4,991,181, entitled ``CATALYST FOR CARBON MONOXIDE 
OXIDATION,'' and for the inventions covered by NASA Case Numbers LAR-
15317-1-CU, entitled ``OXIDATION CATALYST PROMOTER,'' and LAR-15327-1-
CU, entitled ``PROCESS FOR COATING SUBSTRATES WITH CATALYTIC 
MATERIALS.'' Written objections to the prospective grant of a license 
should be sent to Langley Research Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by April 15, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

[[Page 7073]]

Mr. George F. Helfrich, Patent Counsel, Langley Research Center, Mail 
Stop 212, Hampton, VA 23681-0001; telephone (757) 864-9260; fax (757) 
864-9190.

    Dated: February 2, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-3818 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M