alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
 STATE OF DELAWARE 
  

			
	CERTIFICATE NO.	  	NUMBER OF SHARES

 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 Authorized             Shares of 
 Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series U, Par Value $1.00 Per Share 
 This certifies that Computershare Inc, as Depositary, is the owner of             shares of Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred
Stock, Series U, par value $1.00 per share, of JPMorgan Chase & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), fully paid and non-assessable, transferable only upon the books of the Corporation, in person or by attorney, upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed
by its duly authorized officers this day of             ,             . 

 

					
			
	  	 		 	  
		 		 	

 The Corporation will furnish, without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. 







 FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
                     does hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
                                
(            ) Shares represented by within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
                                 as its attorney to transfer such Shares on the
books and records of the Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated:
            , 20    . 
  

					
	In presence of:	 		 	Stockholder:
			
	  	 		 	  
	Name:	 		 	Name:
#### Willie James LEE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-705.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1978.

*693Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marc E. Kirk, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

BERANEK, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction and a 15-year sentence on a charge of first degree arson and raises two points. The first point relates to the introduction of a confession given without *Miranda*warnings. The second point relates to the trial court’s failure to instruct on circumstantial evidence. We reverse on both grounds.

Defendant was incarcerated in the Orange County Jail awaiting sentencing on an unrelated charge. A mattress fire occurred in the defendant’s cell. Defendant was handcuffed, removed from the cell, and placed in a holding cell on another floor in the jail.

The correctional officers in the jail facility extinguished the mattress fire which was not of a serious nature. They subsequently began an investigation. Clearly, the defendant/appellant was the focus of this investigation. Defendant was questioned but was not given any warning as required by *Miranda*v. *Arizona,*384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). During this questioning, defendant admitted setting the fire.

Before trial, defendant’s motion to suppress the confession was denied. The case proceeded to trial and the corrections officer was allowed to testify as to defendant’s confession. The other evidence in the ease was that the fire occurred in defendant’s cell, defendant was the sole occupant of the cell, and defendant was found with a book of matches in his hand. The trial court refused to instruct on circumstantial evidence despite defense counsel’s request.

Under the facts of this case, the trial court erroneously denied the defendant’s motion to suppress and prejudicial error occurred when the defendant’s confession was allowed in evidence in the State’s case in chief. This has been established in *Mathis*v. *United States,*391 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1503, 20 L.Ed.2d 381 (1968) as adopted by the Florida Supreme Court in *Young v. State,*234 So.2d 341 (Fla.1970), where a defendant in custody on another charge was questioned without *Miranda*warnings. In the circumstances of this case it is clear that the defendant was the focus of custodial interrogation without any warnings as to his *Miranda*rights and that this interrogation resulted in the incriminating statements used against him. The situation was not one of exigent circumstances nor a situation where the investigation was merely addressed to persons in the vicinity of a recently committed crime.

It was also error for the trial court not to instruct on circumstantial evidence. Absent the defendant’s confession, there was no other direct evidence. An instruction on circumstantial evidence should have been given. The case is reversed and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, J., and GREEN, OLIVER L., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DANIEL ROBERT MILLER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3723

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 9, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; William H. Burgess, III, 

Judge.

N. Adam Tebrugge of Tebrugge Legal,

Bradenton, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, VILLANTI, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DOCUCON,
INCORPORATED'S CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000, AND ITS CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         590,334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               853,232
<PP&E>                                         130,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (52,302)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 931,732
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          615,083
<BONDS>                                         10,527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          7
<COMMON>                                        36,588
<OTHER-SE>                                     269,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   931,732
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  760,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (784,032)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (793,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                               3,060,268
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,266,611
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64



</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

N o. 04

- 19

- 00846

- CV

Nori Alvarez BAKER

, Appellant

v.

ORANGE PANDA, LLC and Diana Webb, Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI08249 Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRI GUEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s denial

of the motion to dismiss is REVERSED IN PART, and j udgment is RENDERED dismissing four of Appellee Diana Webb’s defamation claims against Appellant Nori Alvarez Baker. The

remainder of the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED. This case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs on appeal.

SIGNED October 28, 2020.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2013, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James T. Barry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  By:   /s/ James T. Barry
                                        ------------------------
                                        James T. Barry
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        June 13, 2013

                                                                   Page 21 of 22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

SCOTT WHITTINGTON, ) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, 

v. ) Civil Case No. 07-2135 (RJL) 

) 

UNITED STATES, ) 

hereby 

) 

Defendant. ) 

ORDn--

(JuneL, 2012) 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is 

ORDERED that the United States' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #27] is 

GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that the remaining counts of plaintiff's Amended Complaint 

[Dkt. #14] are DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4921]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-1155-DR]


California; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of California (FEMA-1166-DR), dated January 4, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery Directorate, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, effective this 
date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I 
hereby appoint Ronald Bearse of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster.

    This action terminates my appointment of John Swanson as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance.)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-4921 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-M
#### Willie Frank THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 8, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Steven Rappaport, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Peter F. LaPorte, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Tirko v. State, Fla.App.1962, 138 So.2d 388; Summerson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 594.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7251-7252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[UT-942-1430-01; UTU-76019, UTU-76020, UTU-76021]


Filing of State Quantity Grant Application; Utah

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 12, 1996, the State of Utah filed quantity grant 
application, UTU-76019, UTU-76020, and UTU-76021, to have 35.00 acres 
of federally-owned land and interest in land transferred to the State 
of Utah under the provisions of Section 7, Section 12, and Section 8, 
respectively, of the Act of July 16, 1894 (28 Stat. 109), and pursuant 
to 43 CFR part 2622.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela D. Williams, Bureau of Land 
Management, Utah State Office, 324 South State Street, PO Box 45155, 
Salt

[[Page 7252]]

Lake City, Utah 84145-0155, 801-539-4107.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The lands containing the federally-owned 
lands and interests in land included in this application are described 
as follows:

Salt Lake Meridian

T. 42 S., R. 14 W.,
    Sec. 8, NW\1/4\SW\1/4\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\, NW\1/4\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\, 
NW\1/4\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\SW\1/4\, NW\1/4\NW\1/4\SE\1/4\, NW\1/4\SE\1/
4\NE\1/4\.

    The area described contains 35.00 acres located in Washington 
County.

    The filing of this application segregates the federally-owned lands 
and interests in land from all forms of appropriation under the public 
land laws, including the mining laws but not the mineral leasing act. 
This segregative effect shall terminate upon the issuance of a document 
of conveyance to these federally-owned lands and interests in lands, or 
upon the publication in the Federal Register of a notice of termination 
of the segregation, or upon the expiration of two years from the date 
of the filing of this application, whichever occurs first.
Teresa L. Catlin,
Chief, Branch of Lands and Minerals Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-3923 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DQ-P
Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A B

**Author:** Abt Associates Inc. **Date Created:** 7/14/2010 **Date Modified:** 2/28/2012 **Purpose:** Compiles PPI of Capital Goods for use in the capital expenditures estimate

**Fi le Contents:**  **Worksheet Contents**  Average Calc Calculates the average PPI value for a specified set of years Data Original PPI data from the BLS

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3444 File Info 1

## Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

**Range Start** 1999 Select first year of the period over which you want to average **Range End** 2010 Select last year of the period over which you want to average **Av erage PPI Value**  147.0

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3444 Average Calc 1Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 A B C D E F G H I J 

### Producer Price Index-Commodities Data extracted on: November 9, 2011 (1:30:37 PM) Series Id: WPUSOP3210

Not Seasonally Adjusted

Group: Stage of processing Item: Manufacturing industries Base Date: 1982

Series Id Year Period Value WPUSOP3210 1991 M13 127.8 WPUSOP3210 1992 M13 129.3 WPUSOP3210 1993M13 131.2 WPUSOP3210 1994 M13 133.2 WPUSOP3210 1995M13 135.8 WPUSOP3210 1996 M13 137.2 WPUSOP3210 1997M13 137.7 WPUSOP3210 1998M13 137.9 WPUSOP3210 1999M13 138.5 WPUSOP3210 2000 M13 139.5 WPUSOP3210 2001 M13 140.4 WPUSOP3210 2002 M13 140.0 WPUSOP3210 2003M13 139.9 WPUSOP3210 2004 M13 142.4 WPUSOP3210 2005M13 146.0 WPUSOP3210 2006 M13 149.2 WPUSOP3210 2007M13 152.5 WPUSOP3210 2008M13 157.3 WPUSOP3210 2009M13 159.2 WPUSOP3210 2010 M13 159.6

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3444 Data 1
#### Amado ROCAMORA, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRAXTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,307,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,068,826
<INVENTORY>                                    136,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,472,107
<PP&E>                                      12,759,174
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,133,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,738,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,333,585
<BONDS>                                     32,938,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,370,725
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,687
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,906,212)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,738,593
<SALES>                                     11,393,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,393,752
<CGS>                                       10,975,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,121,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               813,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             920,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,727,567)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,727,567)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,727,567)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT J. OLIVERI TRUCKING, LLC

v. BILL GOODWIN CONSTRUCTION CO. AND WONDRA CONSTRUCTION, INC. PETITION OF: THE DIME BANK, Intervenor : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 318 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 21st day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0317.00.005.522 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: DMR2011 CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 01/07/13 Time: 1:00 am

pm

Company Name: Alabama Department of Environmental 

Management (ADEM)

ERG Staff Name: Kimberly Bartell

Contact Name: Theo Pinson Contact Phone Number: (334) 274-4202

General Subject: 2011 DMR Concentration Values and Units

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Lee Warren (general industrial), 334-271-7845

Eric Sanderson (head of industrial section) – 334-271-7838

Theo Pinson (head of NW area of state – Dectaur, facility is in Colbert County) – 334-274-4202

*Under ADEM Programs there’s a state listing separated by County

On January 7th, 2013 at 1pm I called Mr. Pinson and left a message.

On January 9th at 2:45pm, Mr. Pinson returned my call and confirmed the Aluminum, Fluoride and Flow data 

for me for Wise Alloys LLC. There were no identified data entry errors. He stated that Outfall 007 is a 

stormwater and treated process water outfall, one that is not typically used unless a large rainfall event occurs. 

He walked me through ADEM’s online system for finding permits and DMRs. 

http://edocs.adem.alabama.gov/eFile/

Media Area: select Water

Permit Number: type in the NPDES ID

Document Category/Type: click custom query, choose FPER = final permit, DPER = draft permit, DMR = 

discharge monitoring reports. 

On January 17, 2013 I called Mr. Pinson back and requested the fact sheet for the facility in order to determine 

which outfalls were internal. He told me he would pull the file and email me a copy of the fact sheet. Please see 

attached email correspondence.
Email Communication with Wise Alloys

From: Theo Pinson

To: Kimberly Bartell

Date: 1/17/13 2:50 PM

Subject: Wise Alloys AL0000035

Kimberly,

Per your request, please find the attached.

Thanks,

Theo

Theo Pinson

Industrial Section

Water Division

(334) 274 - 4202
----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**18        U.S.C. §1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  January 12, 2007 | By:    | /s/                  Michael P. Hydanus                                         |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   | Michael                  P. Hydanus                                             |
|                                    |   | Interim                  President and Chief Executive                  Officer |

----
----

----

EXHIBIT (32)(b)

| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                              |   |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: April 27, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Donna L. Belusar                         |   |
|                 |   | Donna L. Belusar                                  |   |
|                 |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                 |   |                                              |   |