alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATON EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FARREL CORPORATION AS OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1997 AND
FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                       335
<INVENTORY>                                     16,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,554
<PP&E>                                          18,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,099
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,702
<SALES>                                         64,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,261
<CGS>                                           50,150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   108
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                       927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,476
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.25
        

</TABLE>
H. R. 776 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency Medical 

Services for Children program. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Medical Services 

for Children Program Reauthorization Act of 2019’’. 

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 

FOR CHILDREN PROGRAM. 

Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

300w–9(d)) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘2014, and’’ and inserting ‘‘2014,’’; and 

(2) by inserting before the period the following: ‘‘, and 

$22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit
10.1





LETTER
TO PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING NON-RENEWAL OF EMPLOYMENT
CONTRACT








August
13, 2008





Mr. Gary
L. Tessitore


President
and Chief Executive Officer


Fansteel
Inc.


570 Lake
Cook Road, Suite 200


Deerfield,
IL 60015








Dear Mr.
Tessitore:





I am
writing on behalf of the Board of Directors of Fansteel Inc., in regards to your
employment agreement dated January 16, 2004. As per the terms of the Amendment,
we are providing you with notice of non-renewal under the automatic renewal
provisions. With this notice, your existing employment contract will expire on
January 23, 2009.





Please
feel free to contact myself or any of the Board members if you should have any
questions.





Sincerely,








/s/ Brian
Cassady


Brian
Cassady


Board
Member, Fansteel Inc.
United States of America 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Division of Advertising Practices

July 6, 2020 

Via Electronic Mail (lbrett@bbbnp.org) 

Laura Brett, Esq. 

Vice President 

National Advertising Division 

112 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

Re: Advertising by Ceres Turf, Inc. for Miniquad turf aeration tines 

Dear Ms. Brett: 

We have reviewed the National Advertising Division’s referral of Ceres Turf, Inc. 

(“Ceres”) regarding advertising claims for its Miniquad turf aeration tines.1 This referral arose 

out of an April 2020 NAD Challenge filed against Ceres by Trigon Turf Sciences, LLC 

(“Trigon”). Trigon challenged comparative claims about Miniquad, alleging they were made by 

Ceres based on a first-generation model of the Trigon Ninja Tine product that is no longer 

distributed or sold.2 We understand that Ceres, while initially receptive to the NAD process, 

ultimately declined to participate. Accordingly, you referred this matter to the Federal Trade 

Commission for our review. 

Following several communications with Ceres’ counsel, we received confirmation that 

Ceres has discontinued the conduct that gave rise to this NAD Challenge; specifically, the 

company has removed the video containing the challenged claims from YouTube and from its 

website. Ceres’s counsel further stated that Ceres will not make the challenged claims about the 

Ninja Tine product unless Ceres is able to substantiate that claim, and that Ceres will not make 

advertising claims about the first-generation model of the Ninja Tine unless that product is 

currently being distributed and/or sold. Accordingly, staff has determined not to take additional 

action at this time. 

The staff’s decision to forego a formal investigation at this time is not to be construed as 

a determination that a violation may not have occurred, just as the pendency of an investigation 

should not be construed as a determination that a violation has occurred. The Commission 

1

 FTC staff also received correspondence directly from Thomas M. Tremblay, Jr., the owner of Trigon Turf 

Sciences, LLC. 

2

 These claims appeared in a Ceres video that appeared on YouTube and on the company’s website. 
Laura Brett, Esq. 

July 6, 2020 

Page 2 

reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. The FTC 

appreciates your referral and the opportunity to continue to assist in supporting the NAD. 

Very Truly Yours, 

Carolyn L. Hann 

Chief of Staff for Advertising Practices 

cc: Erica B. E. Rogers, Esq., Ward and Smith, P.A. 

s/ Carolyn L. Hann
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Renee S. MORRIS.

No. 61832.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1978.

In re: Renee S. Morris applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ granted. The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Elmo E. Lear, Judge of the 19th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of E. Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 14th day of April, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a day to be fixed by the Court at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
<PAGE>   1
                                

Exhibit 15.     Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information
                from KPMG Peat Marwick LLP



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
First American Corporation:

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheets of First American Corporation
and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
income statements, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 1997 and 1996.  These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken
as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for
them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of First American Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996; and the related consolidated income
statements, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 16, 1997, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 1996, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.


/s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP          
--------------------------

April 17, 1997
Nashville, Tennessee
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS AMENDED SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC AND 
SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,307,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,068,826
<INVENTORY>                                    136,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,472,107
<PP&E>                                      12,759,174
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,133,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,738,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,333,585
<BONDS>                                     32,938,808
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,370,725
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,687
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,906,212)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,738,593
<SALES>                                     24,509,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,509,023
<CGS>                                       21,002,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,569,166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,582,820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,710,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,060,143)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,060,143)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,060,143)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Olian James SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50623.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 19, 1978.

Noble & Noble, James F. Noble, Jr., Brookhaven, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Pete J. Cajoleas, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and WALKER, J.

AFFIRMED.
#### Linda Marie KIMBALL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK AT ORLANDO, etc., Respondent.

No. 39782.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 742.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
#### The GRAND UNION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Appellant, v. CHAIN DRUG COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-339.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Aug. 27, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Wilkow Venture (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc R.
Wilkow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Marc R. Wilkow
--------------

Marc R. Wilkow
Chief Executive Officer

DATED: November 10, 2004

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Wilkow Venture (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
Harrigan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Thomas Harrigan
---------------

Thomas Harrigan
Chief Financial Officer

DATED: November 10, 2004
#### Ezoral WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-938.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 14, 1971.

Ezoral Williams, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of *45the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 99.4

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                        Douglas L. Lowell
                                                             Corporate Relations

                 TRIMARK HOLDINGS, INC. RECEIVED NASDAQ LETTER
                             REGARDING PUBLIC FLOAT

     June 19, 1998, Los Angeles...Trimark Holdings, Inc. (TMRK - NASDAQ/NNM)
reported that it has received a letter from The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. that
the market value of the public float (as calculated under NASDAQ rules) of the
Company's common stock does not meet the NASDAQ National Market $5,000,000
maintenance standard.  The Company must remedy this public float deficiency for
a period of 10 consecutive days by September 2, 1998 in order to maintain
listing on the NASDAQ National Market System.  Currently the Company's common
stock is concentrated in the hands of founders and a registered investment
advisor, which has decreased the public float of common stock.  If the Company
is delisted, the liquidity of its common stock may be adversely affected.  The
Company is presently assessing different options available to it to achieve
compliance with the maintenance standard and is unable to predict whether the
Company will be able to satisfy the public float test by September 2, 1998.  If
the Company is unable to achieve compliance, NASDAQ has informed the Company
that the Company may seek further procedural remedies including a hearing, which
could stay the delisting of the common stock.

     Except for the historical information contained herein, certain matters
discussed in this news release are forward looking statements, within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve
risks and uncertainties.  Such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward
looking statements.  Other matters, uncertainties and risks are detailed from
time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including the report on Form 10-K for
the year ended June 30, 1997 and the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1998.

     Trimark Holdings, Inc., is a broad-based entertainment company which
acquired, produces and distributes motion pictures domestically and
internationally under the Trimark Pictures banner; licenses to the broadcast
industry under the Trimark Television moniker; and distributes to the domestic
home video market under the Trimark Home Video label.
#### DRUMMOND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF BOCA RATON, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. John CASHIN, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-373.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 16, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 16, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0207. ELIZABETH MALLARD v. CHRISTOPHER L. BRAGG.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SU14dr048
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 15, 2014














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---










Item 8.01.     Other Events





Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. announced that Faith Stevenson, CFA, CPA has joined Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. as Director of Institutional Business Development as described in the Registrant's press release dated July 15, 2014, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.





Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. announced that John McClain, CFA has joined Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc. as Credit Analyst as described in the Registrant's press release dated July 15, 2014, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.2 and incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits





Exhibit Nos.Document99.1Press release issued by the Registrant dated July 15, 2014.99.2Press release issued by the Registrant dated July 15, 2014.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.








DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:July 15, 2014By:/s/ James F. LairdJames F. Laird, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### Frank L. THORNTON et al. v. Sharon MORAN et al. Sharon MORAN v. Frank L. THORNTON et al.

No. 60420.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Frank L. Thornton and Government Employees Ins. Co., applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 348 So.2d 79.

Writ denied. The result is correct.