alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Službeni list C 332E/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1088
  doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.332.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 332E |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | 5615. studenoga 2013. |

ISSN 1977-1088

doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.332.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 332E

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

5615. studenoga 2013.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | REZOLUCIJE |
| | Europski parlament |
| 2013/C 332E/01 | Obavijest za čitatelje | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

REZOLUCIJE

Europski parlament

2013/C 332E/01

Obavijest za čitatelje

1

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

REZOLUCIJE

Europski parlament

| 15.11.2013 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CE 332/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2013

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CE 332/1

---

OBAVIJEST ZA ČITATELJE

Rezolucije Europskog parlamenta objavljene u drugim jezičnim verzijama u ovom izdanju Službenog lista usvojene su prije pristupanja Hrvatske Europskoj uniji te stoga nisu prevedene na hrvatski.

---
In the Matter of 

ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ., 

ECM BioFilms, Inc., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NO. 9358 

a corporation, also d/b/a 

Enviroplastics International, 

Respondent. 

ORDER REQUIRING REPLY 

On January 23, 2014, Complaint Counsel filed a Motion to Compel Respondent to 

Produce Documents in response to Complaint Counsel's November 27, 2013 Request for 

Production of Documents ("Motion"). Respondent ECM BioFilms, Inc., ("Respondent" or 

"ECM") filed an opposition to the Motion on January 28, 2014 ("Opposition"). Complaint 

Counsel is hereby ORDERED to file a reply to the Opposition, which shall, without limitation, 

specifically respond to the factual assertions in the Opposition and list clearly the discovery 

requests for which it seeks an order to compel. Complaint Counsel shall file this reply no later 

than February 3, 2014. · 

ORDERED: 

D

_])~~ . Michael Chapp 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: January 29, 2014
#### WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., Appellant, v. FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, Appellee.

No. 73-304.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 6, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned certifies, in his capacity as the Chief Executive Officer of Forlink
Software Corporation, Inc., that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the
company on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.

March 31, 2005

/s/ Yi He
------------------------------
Yi He, Chief Executive Officer
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District FRL #: 9956 - 25 - Region9 Docket #: EPA - R09 - OAR - 2016 - 0318 A - 1. IC 217 Docket Files – excluding State submittal A - 2 . EPA’s Technical Support Document IC 217 - 101 - 202, Nov 2016. B - 1 . Letter from Robert D. Fletcher, Deputy Executive Officer, CARB, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA, dated May 17, 2011. C - 1. SJVAPCD Rule 4570 Confined Animal Facilities, adopted October 21, 2010, approved January 17, 2012 (77 FR 2228) C - 2. SCAQMD Rule 223 Emissions Reduction Permits for Large Confined Animal Facilities, adopted June 2, 2006, approved July 13, 2015 (80 FR 39966); C - 3. SCAQMD Rule 1127 Emission Reductions from Livestock Waste, adopted August 6, 2004, approved May 23, 2013 (78 FR 30768); C - 4. Idaho Administrative Procedure Act (IDAPA) 58.01.01 Sections 760 - 764: Rules for the Control of Ammonia from Dairy Farms (adopted March 30, 2007; amended May 8, 2009). 

### C - 5. Scientific Basis for the Control of Ammonia from Dairy Farms Best Management Practices, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, July 18, 2006. C - 6. United States Environmental Protection Agency Region IX Air Division Technical Support Document for EPA’s Direct Final Rulemaking, Imperial County Air Po llution Control District, Rule 101, Definitions, USEPA, May 2014. C - 7. US EPA’s Region IX Technical Support Document for EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Imperial County Air Pollution Control District’s Rule 201, Permits Required Rule 202, Exemptions, January 2011. C - 8. 77 FR 2228 (January 17, 2012) D - 1. “Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,” EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook, revised January 11, 1990). D - 2. “Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule De ficiencies,” EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook). D - 3. "State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990," 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). D - 4. “State Implementation Plans for Serious PM - 10 Nonattainment Areas, and Attainmen t Date Waivers for PM - 10 Nonattainment Areas Generally; Addendum to the General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” 59 FR 41998 (August 16, 1994). E - 1. 2015 - 05 - 21 Email re EPA comments. E - 2. Attachment - EPA Comments May 21, 2015. E - 3. 2015 - 09 - 04 Email re Draft Rule 217 EPA comments. E - 4. Attachment - Draft Rule Rv7 EPA comments . E - 5. 2018 - 02 - 08 Email re EPA comment s.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice, Notice of Vote, Explanation of 
Action Closing Meeting and List of Persons to Attend

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to Section 
3(a) of the Government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C. 
552b:

Agency Holding Meeting: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

Date and Time: June 7, 2018.

    * NOTE: The Closed meeting will follow the Joint meeting of the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission.\1\

    \1\ See Notice of Joint Meeting of the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 22, 2018.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Place: Restricted Area, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426.

Status: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: Non-Public Investigations and Inquiries, 
Enforcement Related Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, 
Telephone (202) 502-8400.
    Chairman McIntyre and Commissioners LaFleur, Chatterjee, Powelson, 
and Glick voted to hold a closed meeting on June 7, 2018. The 
certification of the General Counsel explaining the action closing the 
meeting is available for public inspection in the Commission's Public 
Reference at 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.
    The Chairman and the Commissioners, the Commission's Secretary, the 
General Counsel, and members of their staff, members of the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, and members of their staff are expected to 
attend the meeting. Other staff members from the Commission's program 
offices who will advise the Commissioners in the matters discussed will 
also be present.

    Issued: May 31, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12123 Filed 6-4-18; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12357]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

[Docket DARS-2018-0006; OMB Control Number 0704-0397]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making a correction to the notice published at 83 FR 
19549 on May 3, 2018, which advised that the Defense Acquisition 
Regulations System submitted to OMB for clearance, a proposal for 
collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act. The document contained an incorrect docket number.

DATES: Applicable June 8, 2018. Applicable beginning May 3, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, telephone 571-372-
6106.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the notice published at 83 FR 19549 on 
May 3, 2018, in the first column, the following correction is made to 
this notice. The docket number cited, DARS-2018-0003, is corrected to 
read DARS-2018-0006.

Amy G. Williams,
Deputy, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2018-12357 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### Theo MILLER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-624.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 9, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
EXHIBIT 10.18(b)

                AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is made
and entered into effective as of July 1, 1996 by and between
VENTURE STORES, INC. ("Venture") and PETER MIHALTIAN
("Executive").

     WITNESSETH, that:

     WHEREAS, the parties entered into a written agreement
entitled "Employment Agreement" effective as of the 30th day of
May, 1995; and

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the term of such
Employment Agreement, as hereinafter provided.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises
and the mutual promises and agreements hereinafter set forth, it
is agreed between Venture and Executive as follows:

     1.   From and after the effective date of this Amendment,
the term "Contract Term" shall mean the period commencing on the
Effective Date of the Employment Agreement (as defined therein)
and ending April 30, 1998 or such other period as Venture and
Executive shall agree from time to time in writing.

     2.   Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all
of the provisions of the Employment Agreement remain in full
force and effect as set forth in the Employment Agreement.  

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the
parties hereto in three counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original, and shall be effective as of the date first
above written.

                                   VENTURE STORES, INC.


                                By:/s/ Robert N. Wildrick     
                                   Robert N. Wildrick
                                   Chairman, President and 
                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                   /s/ Peter Mihaltian        
                                   Peter Mihaltian
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09

- 23

- 00 121

- CR

__________________ BRANDI R HNEE SHELTON , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 163rd District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No. B230038

- R

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On April 20, 2023, Brandi Rhnee Shelton filed a notice of appeal in which she gave this Court notice of her intent to appeal from a ruling from the 163rd District
Court of Orange County denying her petition for habeas relief

. Her notice of appeal failed to state whether the trial court had signed a written order denying her petition
and failed to state the date on which the order (if there was one) was signed.
On May 4, 2023, we notified the parties that it appeared no appealable order
had been s igned in the case. We also notified the parties and the trial court that we2 had not received a certification of th e defendant’s right to appeal. We warned the parties that unless our jurisdiction was established over Shelton’s appeal by May 19, the appeal would be dismissed without further notice. Subsequently, n either party filed responded to our notice . Thus, there is nothing in our record to explain how this Court has jurisdiction over Shelton’s appeal. We have not neither received a copy of an order denying Shelton’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, nor have we received a certification that shows Shelton has a right to appeal. Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on June 20, 2023 Opinion Delivered June 21, 2023 Do Not Publish
Before Horton , Johnson and Wright, JJ.
#### Robert Lee JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-634.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 21, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant below was convicted of robbery. On appeal therefrom he contends the trial court erred by refusing to charge the jury on assault as a lesser included offense, and by sustaining an objection, on the ground of hearsay, to a certain question propounded to a witness. We find no reversible error, and affirm.

The court charged the jury on the offense of robbery, and upon the lesser included offenses of larceny, assault with intent to commit robbery, and assault and battery. On the evidence presented no error was committed by the trial court in not charging on simple assault. See Brown v. State, Fla.1971, 245 So.2d 68, 74-75; Delaine v. State, Fla.1971 (Case No. 39,464 not yet reported).

During testimony by the arresting officer, the defendant’s attorney asked the officer what time the complaining witness had told him the alleged robbery took place. The testimony sought to be elicited *47thereby was inadmissible under the hearsay rule, and was properly excluded. See Har-rolle v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 44, 45.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                        Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
DMX Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 
33-62002) on Form S-8 of DMX Inc. and the registration statement (No. 33-57168) 
on Form S-8 of DMX Inc. of our report dated January 15, 1997, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheets of DMX Inc. and subsidiary as of September 30, 1996,
and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' 
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1996, which report appears in the September 30, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-KA of DMX Inc.

Our report dated January 15, 1997 contains an explanatory paragraph that states 
that the Company has experienced recurring losses from operations and has a net 
capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as
a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any 
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



                                                     KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
January 15, 1997
# STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

State ofConnecticut & Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. ) ) ) ) Trading Agreement & Order No. 8288 Modification I
Whereas, the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and Order 8288 issued on April 22, 20 I0, do now, by mutual agreement, modify said Trading Agreement and Order as follows:
1. Delete paragraph B.14 and substitute the following therefore: Reporting: No later than March I ofevery year after issuance ofthis Trading Agreement and Order, the Respondent shall submit to the Commissioner a written report containing copies ofall ofthe records required pursuant to Paragraph B.12 ofthis Trading Agreement and Order. The Commissioner may prescribe the forms to be used for the submission of these reports. The Respondent shall submit these reports on such forms, ifprescribed by the Commissioner. 2. Change the permit number for the electromotive emergency engine listed in Table 2 from 199-00I0 to 199-00I7. All other terms and conditions ofTrading Agreement and Order No. 8288 issued by the Commissioner acting under Chapter 446c, Sections 22a-6, 22a- I71, 22a-174, 22a- I76, and 22a- I77 ofthe Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/dcp An Equal Opportunity EmployerIDominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. 2 Trading Agreement and Order No. 8288 Modification I

Name: l}espondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and <Drder without further notice. Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. Signature:

# _-'.~L~~~~~~~::::====:::- ..... _ leaHAILlJ 

# k.**~U5** 

# '" . 'Sr.'/ Title:

_ ...**V"--,-r-,,U'i=-en>~-=-I!.-=--** __ AJ--=-

__ 

### <-

_ Date:

# -_-J-~-f-6-""~='il-/.....,Z£>=-!-1**~\)** _

Issued as a modification ofan Order ofthe Commissioner of Environmental Protection

### qa~~.**R~;** Director Engmeering & Enforcement Division Bureau ofAir Management qITY OF WATERFORD MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

1 Certified Document No. 

### /0 - J2. - J.o/O Date
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 and

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The Undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Federal-Mogul Corporation (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that
appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: October 26, 2007



By:

/s/ José Maria AlapontJosé Maria AlapontChairman, President,and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ G. Michael LynchG. Michael LynchChief Financial Officer




75
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bennie C. MORRIS.

No. 54151.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 1974.

Daryl Gold, Shreveport, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., John A. Richardson, Dist. Atty., Albert S. Lutz, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

CALOGERO, Justice.

The defendant, Bennie C. Morris, was charged by grand jury indictment with violation of La.R.S. 14:42, aggravated rape. The defendant was tried and found guilty by a twelve man jury of attempted aggravated rape. Defendant filed a Motion for a New Trial which was denied on August 17, 1973. The defendant was sentenced to be confined at hard labor for a period of seven and one-half years in the custody of the Louisiana Department of Corrections.

During the proceedings below, defendant’s retained trial counsel reserved two bills of exceptions. Neither bill has been perfected .for this appeal. Therefore, our review is limited to errors discoverable by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence. C.Cr.P. Art. 920. State v. Price, 274 So.2d 194 (La.1973).

Defendant’s retained counsel for this appeal urges, however, that we consider the two reserved but unperfected bills as well as other error committed at the trial, as to which bills were not reserved. He contends that we should do this in the interest of justice, and even though there has been no compliance with the procedures set ■ forth in Articles 844 and 920 of our Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure, which *216limit the scope of appellate review in criminal appeals to perfected bills of exceptions and errors discoverable from inspection- of the pleadings and proceedings. His contention is that this procedure and these articles are unconstitutional because they cause a denial of substantive due process and violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 2 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1921. He submits no argument or authorities in support of this contention. We find no merit in this position and will therefore review in this criminal appeal only perfected bills of exceptions and errors discoverable from inspection of the pleadings and proceedings.

We have reviewed the pleadings and proceedings and find no reversible error. Therefore, for the above assigned reasons, the conviction and sentence of defendant, Bennie C. Morris, are affirmed.