• ....~ .;; .r. ) y~ i~~ I• ~ ..:. N :w i~ •... ~ :. ~ ;.;_.. 

.. . ' ~~

:..;.. 

:{ ~ 4 ~..~'

..'.: f ~' •1' ~:.,,~f~ ~i .. 

,~?';~~~~:,~~~;~~ ' ~~.r•4~.`°~~, 

ti~''~ 

.:~,}~ f~~:~ ~ :1•l;`'y"~~ r l. 5-~.~i~:~5~~ 

s ~ :. } ~ ~ 'rt.~.~l' _..• 

 :~.~~~:'~j~y~:~~ ~. F'.. ~T~: 

Jnne 10, 2009 

To: Mr. Jeff Telander 

U.S. EPA Mailroom (13243-02) 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711 

Re: Emissions Tests 

Dear Mr. Telander, 

Enclosed are the Emission Test Results that were performed at StonePeak Ceramics, Inc. 

here in Crossville, Tn. I hope this is enough information for you to work with. These tests 

were performed on the Kilns. The Galze Spray Booths do not have any test data. If you 

have any questions; please do not hesitate to E-Mai1 me wsmithna,stonepeakcelramics.com 

or call me at the numbers below. Thank you for your tune. 

' r ' • ' ' 11 

/ 

Ord 

I% 

WILLIAM SMITH 

STONEPEAK CERAMICS, INC. 

238 PORCELAIN TILE DRIVE 

CROSSVILLE, TN. 38555 

TeI: (931) 459-2509 

Fax: (931) 459-2545 

Cell: (931) 510-2083 

StonePeak Ceramics, Inc. 

314 West Superior 

Chicago, lllinois 60610 

t (312) 335-0321 

f (312) 335-0533 

w stonepeakceramics.com 

Production Facility 

238 Porcelain Tile Orive 

CrossviHe, Tennessee 38555 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 6 

Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions ° 0 

Stonepeak Ceramics 

Crossville, TN 

Kiln Stack 

N ~7~ONR0IUNO.IIVC. 

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg 

Date: 10/12/05 10/12/05 10/12/05 --- 

Start Time 845 1106 1214 --- 

Stop Time 905 1126 1234 --- 

9 Net Time of Test, minutes 20 20 20 --- 

Pbar Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 28.11 28.11 28.08 28.10 

Pg Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.022 -0.022 -0.022 -0.022 

P$ Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 28.088 28.088 28.058 28.078 

Vm Actual Meter Volume Sampled, liters 19.15 19.85 20.38 19.79 

y Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 0.991 0.991 0.991 0.991 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 63.6 65.3 90.4 73.1 

VSM Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 0.63 0.66 0.64 0.64 

Vc Volume of Water Collected, ml 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.0 

VWc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 

BWS Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.069 0.067 0.075 0,070 

PM„ Percent Moisture in Stack 6.9 6.7 7.5 7.0 

MFp Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.931 0.933 0.925 0.930 

%02 Percent Oxygen, Dry 19.0 19.5 19.0 19.2 

%CO2 Percent Carbon Dioxide, Dry 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 

%CO Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 

Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 28.920 28.940 28.920 28.927 

MS Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.166 28.207 28.105 28.159 

Cp Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

APS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H2 0 0.368 

; 

0.363 0.365 0.366 

TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 259.4 260.0 260.3 259.9 

: 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 6 

Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions 0 ° 

Stonepeak Ceramics ° 

Crossville, TN 

Kiln Stack AH MONRONO. W[. Ri 

VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

A Area Stack, ft2 

QsD Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond., CFM 

QA Actual Gas V olume Flow, CFM 

QSW Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

Sulfur Dioxide Concentrations And Emission Rates 

N ~ Normality of Bariurn Perchlorate, g-eq./liter 

Vsoi„ Volume of Sample Solution, ml 

Vt Volume of Titrant Used in Sample, ml 

Vtb Volume of Titrant Used in Blank, ml 

Va Volurne of Sample Aliquot Titrated, rnl 

CS02 Sulfur Dioxide Concentration, lbsldscf 

CAW Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate, lbslhr 

25.2 24.8 25.1 25.0 

10.559 10.559 10.559 10.559 

10250 10111 10105 10155 

15980 15741 15886 15869 

11010 10836 10920 10922 

0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 0.0099 

100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 

0.35 0.50 0.40 0.42 

0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 

10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 

3.30E-06 4.78E-06 3.80E-06 3.96E-06 

2.027 2.903 2.305 2.412 

29 
1 2 

10/12/05 10/12I05 

845 800 

1058 820 

60 60 

28.11 28.11 

-0.022 -0.022 

28.088 28.088 

120.21 120.07 

1.00 1.00 

78.8 96.8 

3.91 3.78 

5.8 6.0 

0.273122 0.28254 

0.065 0.070 

6.5 7.0 

0.935 0.930 

19.00 18.90 

3 

10112105 

800 

820 

60 

29.94 

-0.022 

29.918 

120.15 

1.00 

99.3 

4.01 

6.3 

0.296667 

0.069 

6.9 

0.931 

18.90 

Avg 

28.72 

-0.022 

28.698 

120.14 

1.00 

91.6 

3.90 

6.0 

0.2841 

0.068 

6.8 

0.932 

18.93 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26 

Determination of HC1 & HF Emissions 

Stonepeak Ceramics 

Crossville, TN 

Kiln Stack 

~ 1

~~ f 

~ 

!j ' 3 / 1 

~e~EGRf'fY 

0 

Pba, 

PB 

Ps 

VM 

OH 

TM 

VsTD 

Vc 

Vwc 

Bws 

PMV 

MFD 

%02 

%C 02 

%CO 

Md 

Ms 

Cp 

APS 

TS 

Run Number 

Date: 

Run Start Time 

Run Stop Time 

Net Time of Test, minutes 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 

Static Pressure, in. Hg 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

Actual Meter Volume Sampled, liters 

Avg. Delta H, in. H2 0 

Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 

Volume Sampled at Sta.nd. Cond., cu. ft. 

Volume of Water Collected, ml 

Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

Percent Oxygen, Dry 

Percent Carbon Dioxide, Dry 2.80 2.90 2.90 2.87 

Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.208 29.220 29.220 29.216 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 28.476 28.439 28.447 28.454 

Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.368 0.363 0.365 0.366 

Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 259.4 260.0 260.3 259.9 

30 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA IVfETHOD 26 

Determination of HCl & HF Emissions 

Stonepeak Ceramics 

Crossville, TN 

Kiln Stack 

~ 

e 

e 

aeR ~owrtoewo. rac 

VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

A A.rea Stack, ft` 

Qso Gas Volurne Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 

QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

QSW Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

TP Tile Production Rate, tons/hr 

HC1 Concentration and Emission Rate 

MWc Mole Weight of HC1 

mo HCI Catch, mg 

Cd HC1 Concentration, ppm 

C, HC1 Concentration, gr/dscf 

C" HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 

CAW HC1 Emission Rate, Ibs/hr 

C7P HCI Emission Rate, lbs/ton of tile 

HF Concentration and Emission Rate 

Mwc Mole Weight of HF 

mn HF Catch, mg 

Cd HF Concentration, ppm 

C, HF Concentration, gr/dscf 

Cas HF Concentration, mg/dscm 

CAW HF Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

CTP HF Emission Rate, Ibs/ton of tile 

25.1 24.7 24.1 24.7 

10.559 10.559 10.559 10.559 

10235 10041 10436 10237 

15892 15676 15292 15620 

10950 10792 11208 10983 

5.79 5.79 5.79 5.79 

36.47 36.47 36.47 36.47 

0.37 0.29 0.31 0.32 

2.2 1.8 1.8 1.9 

0.0015 0.0012 0.0012 0.0013 

3.35 2.71 2.73 2.93 

0.13 0.10 0.11 O.l l 

0.022 0.018 0.018 0.019 

20.01 20.01 20.01 20.01 

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 

<0.22 - <0.22 <0.21 <0.22 

<0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 

<0.18 <0.19 <0.18 <0.18 

<0.0069 <0.0070 <0.0069 <0.0069 

<0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 <0.0012 

31 
SUMMA.RY OF RESULTS 

EPA MET1rIOD 26 

Determination of HC1 & HF Emissions ~ 

~ 

Stonepeak Ceramics ~ 

Crossville, TN 

Kiln Stack AIR MONRORiNO. iNC. 

Example Calculations Run 1 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

PS= Pba, + Pg = 28.088 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

17.647 * VM* (Pbar + AH / 13.6) 

VSm = -------------------------------------------------- = 3.9 

TM +460 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

BWS = (SVP - (0.000367 * PS * ( DB-WB) * (1 + (WB-32) / 1571))) = 0.07 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

PN,v = BWS* 100 0.00 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

100 - Pr,n, 

1VIFD = ----------------------- = 0.935 

100 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

Md = 0.44 * %CO2 + 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO 2 - %02) = 29.208 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

MS= Md*(1 - B,ys) + 18.0 * Bws= 28.476 

Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

(TS+ 460) 

VS= 85.49 * CP* APS * SQRT ------------------------- — — 25.1 

(PS * MS) 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 

1058.82 * VS* A* PS*(1 - B WS) 

QsD = --------------------------------------------------- = 10235 

TS+ 460 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

QA = V5 * A* 60 = 15892 

Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

Qsw = Qsn * [1/(1-BWs)] = 10950 

HCl Concentration, gr/dscf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CS=0.0154*m/VS~ = O .oc~ a 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26 

Deterrnination of HCl & HF Emissions 

Stonepeak Ceramics 

Crossville, TN 

Kiln Stack 

HC1 Concentration, ppm 

24.054048 

Cd= Cas * ------------------------------------------------- _ 

MWC 

HCl Concentration, mg/dscm 

(At Standard Conditions) 

C ~ = ma/ (VSTD * 0.0283) _ 

HCl Ernission Rate, lbs/hr 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CA, = 0.00857 * C$ * QsD = 

HC1 Emission Rate, lbs/ton of tile 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CTP = CAW / TP = 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

~ 

x~ 

~ ~~ %1 

~; ~ y / ~► 

~~rEGRiTY 

2.21 

3.35 

0.128 

0.021 

33 
A 

^ a 

/n, ,/"""rx"mnl/",p"inm 

E P -t i'vletbodl ~ 

DerormlnadonofSum}diog Poinm 

suMpun~ 

v ' 

uLv 

so "xnmmm^mmercxIcom/m°o`q 

- X'.c"w^'xmm 

ms ^ --'--................. 

umtaxec*rmuwomNexremommmxwce 

oummmu" 

52 
EPA Nletliod 2 — Fiel(i Data Sheet 

(* , ie,-IE .- (,2rC-IvA5I Cily—slate— - -- - 

Smipling Locatio,,- 

Rut) [lite l'ime 

Bammerric llresstirc. in. I - IL' Pitot 'I'ubc I.D. K41o. L 'ek P G 

S-auc Pressure. Ilitot l'ube Leak C 

r- ield Dal(i 

Tmvene 

point 

Number 

VCIOCICY 110HI Ali Inches 

fil o 

A, 

~Iixir "ell , 4~ 

I eterimnatlawAp. wt 00 Reference. -Afigle NIVIkh Yields a 4ull Ap 

OWH 

L 6.0 C71D o 0.0 

10, 1 to -2 ta 0 Q 6-ek &.o'-; ').Q V.- Z) 

lo t va ;p 49.0 _ g_,0 0.0 0, 0 

10. i4 eD 

6. to a. L) 0,0 

ELOD: 10-0 67. 0 

Averages 

-Suick Temperature. Dr.%. "T iA, Stack- Fe-nipel-ature. wer-F (11) 

Df Merence IA - 11) PreHminary Percenz.Moisturz: 

Comments 

53 
~ 

!

~~ 

EPa Vlethod 3- Molecular Weight Determination — Pield Data Sheet 

Conipanv Nanze ~~ -~ one- 4-4 L2 ~vi C~ Project Number V`J 

City/State __-_- ~rc; ` f .;tk Ttv Sample Date Q 

Sampling Location l: 1 I t, (,• G --_ Operator 

Analyzer Type __ VYA h. Oxyg;n CaEibration9 1,b Fue) Type 1144 

Orsat Leak Check: Burette j)tL - 15. 1., =<0.2 ml? 

Run g ~ 

Gas ReplicAte I : $epllcate 2,:: ~ ' Replicate 3 Avera~e 

PercentActuat hlet :' Actμal Net '.; ;:Actuat lYet 

Co2 

O: a~,~ )G,o ~ r. ~j' S,D a ~.~' 19.t~, lq,c 

co L_ 0 ' ~ 

Fo = ~ 

Run 'i ~L 

Gas Replicate 1 Repliate•2 Replicate 3 Ai erage 

Per.cent 

Actual Net Actual '11iet ; Aetuul -' Net 

co= 

oz r~l ~~ ~ ~~s'`~ ~ ► ~' )`~ ' `l 1 `~ ,`r _j 

CO ~ I . ~~T-T A t • ~ (7 ~ ~• ~i G ~ ^ - J 

Fo= F''~ 

ltun # ~ 

Gas Replicate l -- Repiunte 2 Rep>licate•3 Aveft&,- 

Percent 

ActuAi ."Net -: Actunl hiet Actual Net: (XxX) 

CO2 ~ ct 

Q, ~~ .~a ~ 'v r( 6I• 1~ vve / al, l 

co 

ILL- , $ 211 v 2 

Ft.) -- 04 

20.9% - °io0, 

Fa - ------------------- 

% CO, 

Fa Ranges-For. Common FOels, . 

Anthracite Coal .uid Lignite 1,016 - 1 130 Wood '..Ot>n - 1 120 

: iitum~ n.^.its : c»3 1 0!1? - ? == i ~l•'ood 'e3;uk : 00 : . 1.130 

:)isr.ilarc 01i a"i -:.J1: Natur.i! Gas + ' Mxl - f.83h 

Rcsiclua: Ohl 1:10 • i 370 Ympane ^ ~ 143•1 - I SSr~ 

54 
rp-"! gmitRf ff i

EPA Method2-Field Data Sheet 

ov'WoA cviy~ 5 A14C, Ciient CRj- e%-7'6 5 Citv State . t V' 

it- 1L o 5- Sampling Location K' Pmject Number 

Run Date Operators A-J-)>, SK —11) v- )I -A 

I'llo! I'ubc I.D. No. L) L5-- ) L.cak Check + -3) 

Ruti Number 

Tinic (24-liour(:lock) C) O()LI 1100 . 

Barometfic Pressure, in. Hg 

SEatic Prmure. 1-1,0 49 -30 — 0 51) 

Stack Temp.,Di.. *F PASmck Temp., 'Wet. OF 

Differencc. OF 

tvioisture. % 

0 

J.. 

t 

T 

p 'r ~ ' p.~ `t - Zs ~o ©, ~{ ,a ~ 1 0.1 a~ 

5`7 

7- Le 1 gl4a:a 

o, o 

L4 

1; C) di - 140 149 

L) '1 62 • Lo aloa 

o 6.)q 

oil/ 2-J-9 D&D 

5q -2 D•5 

51. • L-t I o- Jit a I ------ 

1-5T" (00-:3 

55 
Run Impinger 1 Impinger 2 Impinger 3 Impinger 4 Impinger 5 Impin er 6 Total 

Final Wei ht, 9 113, ~ 1i 1. 1 1 t3. 7 c78 

~ Initial Wei ht, g 2 l) ~• ~ 9`y, ~ 1~~ . 7 }`="' 

Gain, o: ) c,~ ~~ 3 t ~• 

Final Wei ht, g 1i3. tp 1$3 h 3.. 't dj.2 

2 Initial Wei ht, g 113. ! 10. 3 113•• Z q4•2 W $ 

Gain, g 0 Ij 0 • ~ 

Final Wei ht, g 1 i ~ . ~0 1 ~ 3. Z ), 3, 3 91 , f4 1 L: ~ 

3 Initial Wei ht, g 1 13. 2 1.* 3. 1 1) 3. z cl Y 

Gain, g la 

Final Wei ht, g 101 V l lH, 1 1 ~ 3• ~} 1 i 2, 7 ~~ ' 

4 Initial Wei ht, g i!3 • C~ I)3 ,`~ Ii ~j.7 1l1 ,H f.' _ 

Gain, K 0 0, ~1 Q ~ Z I' ~1 54 

Final Weight, ! l ~- ~ 1I~1, j 1i 3.ti ~ t~ ~lo 

5 Initial Wei ht, g ~ i 3.Z 1 ~~}.~ I )3.{, i 1 l•~ ..: ; 

Gain, g '~~ ~. U~~ 0~! ti~ ~j ~ • b 

Final Wei ht, g 1 i$ ~ 11'~ .~ I i J•"! I i ~•'~ 

6 Initial Weight, g 1iK a 10• , I~~J '~ 114.c 

IL- F— Gain, g L 1 •7 ~ - 3 

/ V1' (+' 

,N Z l.; 

EPA Reference Method 4 

Mini-Impinger Sampling 

Moisture Determination 

Client jz ra^"1~ y 

City, State ~Xv~iS•~=~L~ , ~ 

Sampling Location tik-f4 n a

we 
ER4 .4lethod 2 -- Fielif Dtiiei S6ee 

~~~—.^.—_.--. Project Nwriber 

—_-- __---'— 

LN-1 02i-- 

Te 

rg 

TU 

—T (D - Ol a 5f, 

55 
Field Data Slieet - EPA iVIetliod 6 — Sulfur Dioxide Sainpling 

Client Sunee k Ruit Ntimher 

citv"Stale Cr(.,rssville,,*I*N Date lo/ II/o5 

Swnplir g Location Kiiii Stack Operators JALAJD 

Sample *ID No. Console No al vwr- t AHK 1. Y=-- 

oiqql 

Observer Agency_ ~~ ETC Stan Time D End Time 5- 

Crock 

DGas. 

4icut= . T itile 

5 

lo 2,j ~D Lg~ ~~ (9 1) 

15 Li 

20 

4

1 

25 

30 

35 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

nv 

Sy 

M:~-1 
l'ietti Diit(i Slieet - ER-1 Werhod 0 — Suljiir Dioxide.Yintipling 

CI ient Ruxi Nuniber 

Cit•/State Crossville. TN Datc 

Sampling Location K-in Stack Operators JAL, AID 

Sample 11) \o. _.~ L ComioicNo. Ally Y= - - 

ZI KmviA., Aeume..• Start Time Elid 'I iiiit: 

Clock 'r 

PUMP 

... Vhcuum.~~ 

Time Cubi&faet `5 F- 

~ A verage Hg 

q (0, j!-) (OLI 

Li 

~ ___ 1; ..__ ~a . ~ ~ _ : - c~~ ~ ~ s~ 

20 ofc 

25 

30 

35 _ffiw 

45 

50 

55 

60 

to ) 

(01 

(p L) 

(_0 t 

mi 
Field Data Sli eet - EPA iVetli od 6 -;-Suffiur Dioxide Sampling 

CHent Sionelleak Ccraiiiics Run Number 3 

Citv!state Crossville. TM Date 

Sampling Location Kiln Stack Operators jAI-,AJD---,. 

Siiiiiple iD No. 14D Console No.,-VP57E- AH. y 

Observer Agency S= Time End *rime 

Dry: Gras 

Clock t., Meter' er-.*. 

nat,6 -. -C bi OFS .Jnchesr 

0 

5 

10 

15 91 (P5 C, 

20 

25 

1eNMIM-1 

30 

)5 

40 

45 

50 

55 

60 

J10 

5- 

am 
Field Daur.gheet - ER4 Method 2ti - Hydrogen Citiot-ide 

C I tv/'s tat .4 1 tte-- DauSaiituiiiig Locition Operators 

Par. Prcss., III H!, Samp I c ID No. LEAK CF•CU 

Smuc Pmss., In. F-20 Y 0• 01)S--V(,- -r 04F 611 1 Ln. H g. 

i%.Ictc-,BoyNo.VO , 51- 4!~2~ Prr)bcNo. %~- Arcncy ~"A T'Ost--Teslzo--Col Ov I.Ii 

Sailiple Box No M~ LO Probe T=p. St-tting Star-,Ti me End -1 - ime 24 - H-, 

Ana4ysis ofAlifistureftecoven; 

15-i-Pinger Absorbing .13olution 11,804 

Fu Volume. riii 

Initi , ~K V olume, nil 200 

Net C2 e

iised Volume, rnl I 

ImpinuerNsorbing Solution NaOH 

Final Volum 

I Initial VolunieNfl 200' 

Net CondensedV ume, rnl 

1 'I'otal Condensed V 

hLq 

Po-rcent Silica Gre.1 Spciit 

Final Weight, 

bli-dalWeighL. g 300 

Net Absor :)ed N~7 ater. z 

-Totall Reagen•Collected, z 

S~-'v p p e- 41 i-u n e, 05 o~ 

Is 
Field Data Sheet - EPA .41-ethod 26 — -FFydrt ~cyt Clzloi-itle, 

RLmN-un*ib--r -Zcim'statc z Date /Z)/Ig J,04— 

Sainniffic Location Operators 

R I L'T. III FIC SaMpil, M I No. LEAK Cf-1FCX.lV 

Static Prcs:,.. im H: O AF! L N' (SO Observer 

P-ox No. Probe NC'L Iii: 

Sample Box No. Probe Tcmp. St:ffing S,.arl, Time jlp~o F-rid Time 

Aizal),-sis ofAloiscure.Recoveij, 

J.-npinger Absofbing,Solution 

Nual Volume, rni 

ini olume, n-fl '100 

Nic- t C ensed Volume, rnl 

In-,Ping,.-r 'AR'sorbin.,- Solutioii Na011 

Final V(Ilume\,rnl 

Initia IVolunia, lql 200 

Net Condensed Vkunic. rril 

Total Condensed V( tne, nil 

kLi 

P,;rcentSilica Gel Speiit 

Fizial W night. g 

initizil Waight, c 300 

Net Absorbed Water, e 

k* 

Total Reagent Colltctc~d. 

—Af : Mr. 

61 
•ichl Dula Sht?et - EP4 Mcthod 26 — Hvdr(.-A, c, n Chloride 

-rA.) Date 

Sarmilill" Location iT- Operators 

cs s. I SaTnple IL) Na. L E. 4 K CHF. CKS 

1~ tatic Press- fin. H.--(') %t Y - Obsnrvrr rjkrc~- 11*cst4g, cpt7. (it; _!577_ In. 

Aizc e C, 00 ncN Post-'7est 

Sart-uh. Bo\ No. Yl '-::4 Probe Temp. St:ttmg sinn, 01 Li Fn(]'ri-,iic '14 

I W- 111 111-l" U 

AL 

W 

i'R 

-.2 

-4mitV.vis qf:ffohvtu•• Recoveg 

,nt)inp-e.-A't)sorb-'ni!Solu*,iL)rj H,SO- I 

F-"i*V I o t u,n e. m'; 

Initia Volume. ril 200 

~

Net COAensee N"olutiie, in*' 

I:n inger -Nsorbing Solution NaOl-I 

Fi.-ial Vohiin\ -pl 

Lnital Volumc,) 200 

Not Condcust:d Va C., ml 

Total (7-ondens--d ~03EIC. all 

P-rccnt S i c a Gc; !S -,:at 

g 

liiii-ial Weit!ht, g 30(" 

Nc: Abs r 

1. W 

ottal Reagent Collected, g 

62 
~ 

~f 

~ .~...... ~ 

F:PA Nlethod 6Analvsis - Determination of Sulfur Dioxide 

l.aboratorv Data Sheet 

Client: 5tonepeak Ceramics Project Number: 0-5 -083 

CitvlState: CrosSville, '1'N Sample Dates: 10/10-12/05 

Sampling Location: Atomizer, Dryer & Kiln Analyst: JA L Date: 1 UI l 7i2005 

'olume & Normality of Standard Sulfuric Acid Solution: 25.00 ml 0.0100 N 

'olume & Normality of Barium Perchlorate Titrant: 1.) 2i.30 ml 0.00988 N 

2.) 2530 ml 0.00988 N 

Average Volume &: Nor7nality: 2 5.3 0 ml 0.00988 N 

Analvtical Data 

Sample 

Number 

Sample 

ldentification 

Total 

Sample 

Vol. Vsotn 

Sample 

Aliquot 

Vol. Va 

Volume of Titrant Vt, ml 

lst 

Titration 

2nd 

Titration 

Average 

Volume 

5083-01 V Drver - Run 1 100 10 0.15 0.10 0.13 

5083-02 V Drver - Run 3 100 10 0.10 0.15 0.13 

5083-0 3 V Drver - Run 3 100 10 0.10 0.15 0.13 

5083-04 Atomizer - Run 1 1000 20 0.15 0.15 0.15 

5083-05 Atomizer - Rurn 2 1000 20 0.15 0.15 0.15 

5083-06 Atornizer - Kun 3 1000 20 0.15 0.15 0.15 

5()8 3-07 Kiln -]Zurn 1 100 l0 0.35 0.35 0.:15 

5083-08 Kiln - Run ? 100 10 0.50 0.50 0.50 

5083-09 Kilrr - Run a 100 10 0.40 0.=10 0.40 

5083-10 IBlank 3°% H2O2 100 1 10 0.05 0.05 0.05 

1326 1 QC ID 0592 100 1 20 8.85 8.70 8.78 

QC Sample True Yalues 

Sample No. 1'rue Value Obtained Value Percent Recoverv Percent Difference 

132fi 66t).0 657.5 ma,'dcsm 99.6 °~o r -0.4 "YQ' 

Notes: The volume fr tlte blattk must be the sante as that of the sttnrple aliyttot. 

The uhsoltrtEr value for the l.st and 2nd titration mu.stbe eyual to or less tltan 0.2 ml. 

65 
Compnny :eya etiC a,-,it,5 

City, Strcte: C S%i lle ~ 

I T.kJ 

Contact: 

Lahoratory: 

Project No. 

Purchase Order: 

T,.,,{,e,al ► Nnmber of C:ontHiners Sam plin Ntethods 

Q y- b$ 

~ 1 Satn` 1`e D+~scription - :Sample=`It) D ' `e . at 

'. .-`- . . .... _ .4 - Samp1~ Dp4 is sition ' ~rid =R' m' ea ~-ks. 

V W briu' m ° a DL ,I S-P 

R,% ti 

~ 5OV'0 

56% -0 •iD 11 Dyr i 50 OctVi ~1~e, 0 #7 &Z l 0 1-4se 

5"0 s3 -0 ._ '. 11 t 

h M '06 

t ~1~ 

' tl 

5,010 - ts-~ +04e 3 ,!t-AIvz *4 

C► lh I- c ~ ~ I 0s3 ,- 07 tD//Z t7s- 1lb Oz 02) NtU rk j( 

~ Tc?&O - LYI 1 

-11 

t) 50) - 

}telinquislied Ry: Date/Titne Received By: I)atc!Time Special In.ctructio,cs: 

ltelinquislied 13y: Date/Time Receivcd t3y: [)ate,Time 

R ived fi~ r l aborate ► B: Date!Time Anah~ze~ %r,r the~ %11o t~in Cont oruacl.v: ^ af C~ 1~ /`( 

0 
Integrity Air Monitoring, Inc. 

9548-D Mt. Holly Huntersville Road 

Huntersville, NC 28078 

Project Number: 05-083 

Hydrogen Chloride 

And Hydrogen Fluoride 

EPA Method 26 Analysis 

Analytical Report 

6053 

Element One, Inc. 

e~f 5022-C Wrightsville Av., Wilmington, NC 28403 

1 910-793-0128 FAX: 910-792-6853 e11ab(cD,e1lab.com 

67 
October 27, 2005 

The following data for Analytical Report 6053 

has been reviewed for completeness, accuracy, 

adherence to method protocol, 

and compliance with quality assurance guidelines. 

Review by: 

Report Reviewed and Finalized By: 

Ken Smith, Laboratory Director 

October 27, 2005 

etemen$One 

. : 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

el ementOne 
Summary of Analysis 

Summary of Hydrogen Chloride and Chlorine Analysis 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Blank 

5083-11 5083-12 5083-13 5083-14 

Element Total mg Total mg Total - mg Total mg 

HCI 0.37 0.29 0.31 < 0.01 

H F < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.01 

Hydrogen Chloride Duplicate Analysis RPD and Spike Recoveries 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Blank 

Run Number 5083-11 5083-12 5083-13 5083-14 

RPD/RSD, % 1.2% 0.6% 3.9% NA 

Recovery, % 103% 

Hydrogen Fluoride Duplicate Analysis RPD and Spike Recoveries 

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Blank 

Run Number 5083-11 5083-12 5083-13 5083-14 

RPDIRSD, % NA NA NA NA 

Recovery, .°/n 98% 

zfementOne 

70 
Element One Analytical Narrative 

Client: Integrity Air Monitoring Element One #: 6053 

Client ID: Stone Peak Ceramics Analyst: MAL 

Method: M26 Dates Received: 10/14/05 

Analytes: HCI & HF Dates Analyzed: 10/25-26105 

Summary of Analysis 

The sample was prepared and analyzed according to Method 26 protocol. The 

samp(e was analyzed for chforide and fluoride on a Metrohm 761 /788 ion 

chromatograph system. 

Detection Limits 

The Metrohm reporting limit was 0.1 Ng/ml for chloride and fluoride. 

Analysis QAIQC 

Duplicate analyses relative percent difference (RPD) and spike recovery data are 

summarized with the results. AII QA/QC data was within the criteria of the 

method. 

Additional Comments 

The reported results have not been corrected for any blank values or spike 

recovery values. Nothing unusual was noticed with the sample or analyses. 

e i a men-&',One 

72 
-- - - -- -- —~ 

Cn o 5~ 

~ 

- -- __ CHAIN ® F CUSTODY 

~ '/ \ n7~~. ~ t) VD 

AOR MONYTOR ~ QVG_ oNC_ 

Company: 

City, Stute: Cl V~y~ . t(~ !u' 

Cont.tct: /(41/ 1i7 t 4 y dy. I. Pu 

Laboratory: 

Project No. 

rettAse Order: 

-L4t.e Ntimber of Cont.tiners Snm lin g Methotis 

.4. c. c .; ~S am" s . _. p~ , ~ ~s._..._ es - c' ~'1nti. on , , ~., . . ., _ . :._ , f 

~.~ "l`~I iw D , . ... -.. ~#~?r~it~._ .. ~ . ._... 

t ~ '~N_. e . ,. . . ~?~. t 

l:: 'S m le_ ts • •issi ~ Ir.s .. ~ R. . . . -~:~ s~ . . P . ~? n 1i .r~,~i~~~~~?~~. .a 

. 41" k ~+2~ ~-~ ~$ J ~ r~ 1 b l? p 5- .a11,4 twy T, 761 

~~:2 5 08 ~ - Z 

IM- + • ! ~ / w 1 ~ 

b~a~ ~~0~3 ~ y 

• r Relinquished By: ~~ at ~T mg~Lb 

i t 

Received By: Datel'I'i ►► ~ e Speciril htstruclir»zs: 

Relinquished E3v: 

, 

~ 

]teceived E3y: I)utc; I'ime 

lteceived for Laborato y B: Daterl'inie : irlalyze nr 1he Jo11owing Com orutris: 14 

-_J 

41- 
i One AIR TESTING SAMPLE SUBMISSION FORM LablD # 6053 

DUE DATE: 10.28.05 

Project ID/ Number: I 05-083 

lient: Integrity Date / Time Received: 10.14.05 14171 

0:j Lot: H F Lot: HCI Lot: Ref. Method: 

Volume Markedoy N Volume Loss Y 16/ ? pH < 2.0& N 2-&A TSample Identification -nple Identification 

1 M-26A-5083 11 Rl 

2 M-26A-5083 12 R2 

3M-26A-5083 13 R3 

4 M-26A-5083 14 Blank 

f

.._._~_ ..._. .~_- -- — 

Analy~sis Requested Samples 1-4 HCI and HF 

n aYsi s Requested Spike R3 A 

-- --------- -- Impinger 1&2 Impinger 3&4 

Notes: 

WPLE BV, mi FV, m 

c) l 

BV, mi FV, mi 

to 

2 

3 

4 

,- ____r__ _ _____...____ ~___ 

_ __ ~ ___ _ . ____. 

~ __ _ 

~ _ __ __ __- __ __. 

1-Cor-~ m--en, ts--: 

I Element One, liic. Form 1 , 18 - Revision 6.0 

Page 1 of 1 

Sample Submission Form bvw 

10/14/2005 3:08:54 PM 

_ __ . ~ ~ ___ .. _._ ~ __.._ _. 

__ _ __ _ i ~ 

► 

____ _._ .- _ ._ - _._.. ~ -! 

_-. _ _______.~~ , 

__ _ ____._ . _ i _~ 

_ _ .__. -__ , , 

W, 
element4ne M26-HC! IC Data Sheet Lab iD #: 6053 

,ient: Integrity Column: Metrosep A Supp 5 

Date: 'i 0127/05 Eluenfi: 3.2 mM Na 2CO3/ 1.0 mM NaHCO3 

Analyst: MAL F1ow Rate: 0.7mLlmin. 

Detection Limit, (Ng/ml): 0.10 CI" to HC! factor: 1-028 

Cl' Final HCI, Spike, % 

Sample ID 

--------------- 

Nglml 

---------- 

Dilution 

---------- 

Vol, ml 

--- ------- 

Total mg 

---------- 

pg/ml 

---------- 

Recovery 

---------- 

file name 

--------------- 

date time 

--------------- 

LRB 0.039 1 10 < 0 pa251544.CHW 10125/2005 15:44 

LRB 0.065 1 10 < 0 pa251624.CHW 10/25/2005 16:24 

LRB Spk 4.712 1 10 0.048 5.00 93% pa251705.CHW 10/2512005 17:05 

LRB Spk 4.689 1 10 0.048 5.00 93% pa251745.CHW 10/25/2005 17:45 

6053-1 1.803 2 100 0.4 pa252309.CHW 10/25/2005 23:09 

60-53-1 dup 1.781 2 100 0.4 pa252350.CHW 10/25/2005 23:50 

6053-2 1.431 2 100 0.3 pa260030.CHW 10/26/2005 0:30 

6053-2 dup 1.423 2 100 0.3 pa260111.CHW 10l26/2005 1:11 

6053-3 1.499 2 100 0.3 pa260151.CHW 10126/20051:51 

6053-3 dup 1.558 2 100 0.3 pa260232.CHW 10/26J2005 2:32 

6053-3 spk 6.688 2 190 1.4 5.00 103% pa260313.CHW 10/26/2005 3:13 

r-053-3 spk 6.692 2 100 1.4 5.00 103% pa260353.CHW 10/26/2005 3:53 

J3-4 0.000 1. 100 < 0 pa260514.CHW 10/26/2005 5:14 

6053-4 dup 0.000 1 100 < 0 pa260555.CHW 10126l2005 5:55 

Standards 

0.1 ppm Std 0.102 4% 102% pa251106.CHW 10/25/2005 11:06 

1.0 ppm Std 0.874 4% 87% pa251141.CHW 10/25/2005 11:41 

5.0 ppnl Std 4.648 8°l0 93°!o pa251221.CHW 10125l2005 12:21 

10.0 ppm Std 10.172 1% 102°lo pa251302.CHW 10/25/2005 13:02 

20.0 ppm Std 21.578 2% 108% pa251342.CHW 10125/2005 13:42 

0.1 ppm Std 0.098 98% pa261603.CHW 10/26/2005 16:03 

1.0 ppm Std 0.913 91 % pa261643.CHW 10/26/2005 16:43 

5.0 ppm Std 5.011 1000% pa261724.CHW 1 0/26/2005 1 7:24 

10.0 ppm Std 10.289 103% pa261804.CH.W 10/26/2005 18:04 

20.0 pprn Std 21.955 110%, pa261845.CHW 10/26/2005 18:45 

QC Check Std 4.526 91 % pa251423.CHW 10125/2005 14:23 

QC Check Std 4.517 90°lo pa251503.CHW 10I25l2005 15:03 

nC Check Std 4.761 95% pa260635.CHW 10126/2005 6:35 

Check Stc 4.802 96% pa260716.CHW 10126/2005 7:16 

QC Check Std 4.842 97% pa261401.CHW 10/26/2005 14:01 

QC Check Std 4.625 93% pa261441.CHW 10/26105 14:41 

77 
elementOne M26A-HF IC Data Sheet Lab ID #: 6053 

Aient: Integrity Column: Metrosep A Supp 5 

Date: 10/27/05 Eluent: 3.2 mM Na2CO3/ 1.0 mM NaHCO3 

Analyst: MAL Flow Rate: 0.7mLlmin. 

Detection Limit, (Ng/ml): 0.10 F' to HF factor: 1.053 

C1' Final HCI, Spike, % 

Sample ID 

--------------- 

Ng/ml 

---------- 

Dilution 

---------- 

Vol, ml 

---------- 

Total mg 

---------- 

Ng/ml 

---------- 

Recovery 

---------- 

file name 

--------------- 

date time 

LRB 0.000 1 10 < 0 pa251544.CHW 

--------------- 

10/25/2005 15:44 

LRB 0.000 1 10 < 0 pa251624.CHW 10/25/2005 16:24 

LRB Spk 4.802 1 10 0.051 5.00 96% pa251705.CHW 10/25/2005 17:05 

LRB Spk 4.786 1 10 0.050 5.00 96% pa251745.CHW 10/25/2005 17:45 

6053-1 0.037 2 100 < 0.02 pa252309.CHW 10/25/2005 23:09 

60-53-1 dup 0.039 2 100 < 0.02 pa252350.CHW 10/25/2005 23:50 

6053-2 0.025 2 100 < 0.02 pa260030.CHW 10/26/2005 0:30 

6053-2 dup 0.014 2 100 < 0.02 pa260111.CHW 10/26/2005 111 

6053-3 0.011 2 100 < 0.02 pa260151.CHW 10i26/2005 1:51 

6053-3 dup 0.012 2 100 < 0.02 pa260232.CHW 10i26/2005 2:32 

6053-3 spk 4.963 2 100 1.0 5.00 99°/n pa260313.CHW 10/2612005 3:13 

R053-3 spk 4.863 2 100 1.0 5.00 97% pa260353.CHW 10126/2005 3:53 

53-4 0.000 1 100 < 0.01 pa260514.CHW 100126/2005 5:14 

6053-4 dup 0.000 1 100 < 0.01 pa260555.CHW 10126/2005 5:55 

Standards 

0.1 ppm Std 0.098 1% 98% pa251106.CHW 10/25/2005 11:06 

1.0 ppm Std 1.006 5% 101 % pa251141.CHW 10/25/2005 11:41 

5.0 ppm Std 4.735 5°l0 95% pa251221.CHW 10/25/2005 12:21 

10.0 ppm Std 10.123 1°io 101 % pa251302.CHW 10/25/2005 13:02 

20.0 ppm Std 20.468 2% 102% pa251342.CHW 10/25/2005 13:42 

0.1 ppm Std 0.099 99% pa261603.CHW 10/26/2005 16:03 

1.0 ppm Sto 0.954 95% pa261643.CHW 1012612005 16:43 

5.0 ppm Std 4.999 100% pa261724.CHW 10/26/2005 17:24 

10.0 ppm Std 10.251 103% pa261804.CHW 10/26/2005 18:04 

20.0 ppm Std 20.850 104% pa261845.CHW 10/26/2005 18:45 

QC Check Std 4.531 91 % pa251423.CHW 10/25/2005 14:23 

QC Check Std 4.565 91 % pa251503.CHW 10/25/2005 15:03 

nC Check Std 4.719 94% pa260635.CHW 10126/2005 6:35 

Check Std 4.769 95% pa260716.CHW 10/26/2005 7:16 

QC Check Std 4.523 90% pa261401.CHW 10/26/2005 14:01 

QC Check Std 4.544 91 % pa261441.CHW 10/26/05 14:41 

78 
APPENDIX 4 

PKODUCTION DOCUMENTATION 

79