Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 1 of 28 PageID 8609 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

ORLANDO DIVISION 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 

Case No. 6:18-CV-862-ORL-37DCI 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

STIPULATED ORDER FOR 

MOBE LTD., MOBEPROCESSING.COM, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND 

INC., TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT USA, MONETARY JUDGMENT AGAINST 

INC., MOBETRAINING.COM, INC., 9336- MATTHEW LLOYD MCPHEE 

0311 QUEBEC INC., MOBE PRO LIMITED, 

MOBE INC., MOBE ONLINE LTD., MATT 

LLOYD PUBLISHING.COM PTY LTD., 

MATTHEW LLOYD MCPHEE, SUSAN 

ZANGHI and INGRID WHITNEY, 

Defendants. 

Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), filed its 

Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Relief pursuant to Section 13(b) of the 

Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §53(b) (“Complaint”). The FTC and 

Individual Defendant Matthew Lloyd McPhee (“McPhee”) stipulate to the entry of this 

Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment (“Order”) to resolve all 

matters in dispute in this action between them. 

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 

FINDINGS 

A. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter. 

B. The Complaint charges that McPhee participated in deceptive acts or practices 

in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45. 

-1-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 2 of 28 PageID 8610 

C. McPhee neither admits nor denies any of the allegations in the Complaint, 

except as specifically stated in this Order. Only for purposes of this action, McPhee admits 

the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction. 

D. McPhee waives any claim that he may have under the Equal Access to Justice 

Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action through the date of this 

Order, and agrees to bear his own costs and attorney fees. 

E. McPhee and the FTC waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge or 

contest the validity of this Order. 

DEFINITIONS 

For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions apply: 

A. “Business Coaching Program” means any program, plan, or product, 

including those related to work-at-home opportunities, that is represented, expressly or by 

implication, to train or teach a participant or purchaser how to establish a business or earn 

money or other consideration through a business or other activity. 

B. “Corporate Defendant(s)” or “MOBE Corporate Defendant(s)” means 

MOBE Ltd., MOBEProcessing.com, Inc., Transaction Management USA, Inc., 

MOBETraining.com, Inc., 9336-0311 Quebec Inc., MOBE Pro Limited, MOBE Inc., MOBE 

Online Ltd., Matt Lloyd Publishing.com Pty Ltd., and each of their subsidiaries, affiliates, 

successors, and assigns. 

C. “Costa Rica Resort Property” means the resort property located at Esterillos 

Este Beach at the West End Punta, Esterillos Este, 60901, Costa Rica, including: the 

concession land (Lot Registration Number P-1109-Z-000); the hotels or accommodations 

-2-
 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 3 of 28 PageID 8611 

(also known as Sunset del Mar Resort) situated on the lot; all buildings, fixtures, plant and 

equipment, furniture and fittings, office equipment, and chattels located on the property; and 

all income, revenues, profits, dividends or distributions generated from the operation or 

ownership of the property. 

D. “Defendant(s)” means MOBE Corporate Defendants and Individual 

Defendants, individually, collectively, or in any combination. 

E. “Fiji Resort Property” means the resort property located in the waters of 

Nadi Bay, Fiji, including: the parcel of land of approximately 48 acres (Native Lease No. 

25143, also known as Kadavu or Kadavulailai Island or Bounty Island); any hotels or 

accommodation situated on the land; all buildings, fixtures, plant and equipment, furniture 

and fittings, office equipment, and chattels located on the property; and all income, revenues, 

profits, dividends or distributions generated from the operation or ownership of the property. 

F. “Individual Defendant(s)” means McPhee, Susan Zanghi, and Ingrid 

Whitney (as personal representative of the Estate of Deceased Defendant Russell W. 

Whitney), individually, collectively, or in any combination. 

G. “Investment Opportunity” means anything, tangible or intangible, that is 

offered, offered for sale, sold, or traded based wholly or in part on representations, either 

express or implied, about past, present, or future income, profit, or appreciation. 

H. “Kuala Lumpur Properties” means the two residential apartment units in the 

Menara Soho housing development located at A1-7-1, SS@KLCC, No. 20, Jalan Perak, 

50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Parcel No. A1-7-1, Floor No. 7, Building No. A1) and B2-

-3-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 4 of 28 PageID 8612 

15-3A, No, 20, Jalan Perak, 50450 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (Parcel No. B2-15-3A, Floor 

No. 15, Building No. B2). 

I. “McPhee” means Individual Defendant Matthew Lloyd McPhee, a/k/a Matt 

Lloyd. 

J. “Receiver” means the receiver appointed in this action, Mark J. Bernet, Esq., 

and any deputy receivers that he names. 

K. “Receivership Entities” means MOBE Corporate Defendants as well as any 

other entity that has conducted any business related to Defendants’ marketing and sale of 

Business Coaching Programs or Investment Opportunities to consumers, including receipt of 

Assets derived from any activity that is the subject of the Complaint in this matter, and that 

the Receiver determines is controlled or owned by any Defendant. 

L. “Related Entities” means corporate entities that are owned or controlled by 

McPhee, whether in whole or in part, other than the MOBE Corporate Defendants, including 

without limitation MOBE Holdings Limited (Malta), ML Index Investments Pty Ltd. 

(Australia), CAIF Property Holdings, Ltd. (Hong Kong), CAIF Property Holdings CR, S.A. 

(Costa Rica), CAIF Property Holdings – Fiji Ltd. (Hong Kong), Kadavulailai Development 

Pte Limited (Fiji), Sunset del Mar Investments, S.R.L. (Costa Rica), Mar y Tierra del Oeste 

M.T.O., S.A. (Costa Rica), Transaction Facilitator USA, Inc., Transaction Management 

USA, Inc., Transaction Processing USA, Inc., Web Payment Facilitators USA, Inc., Web 

Payment Management Services USA, Inc., Web Payment Processing USA, Inc., Business 

Education Training Ltd., Discovery Tours & Transportation SRL (Costa Rica), Esterillos 

Assets Management CR, S.A. (Costa Rica), and Sala Levu Resort Ltd. (Fiji). 

-4-
 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 5 of 28 PageID 8613 

M. “Settling Defendant” means Matthew Lloyd McPhee. 

N. “Special Receiver” means Burton W. Wiand, Esq. and any deputy special 

receivers that he names. 

ORDER 

I. BAN ON SALE OR MARKETING OF BUSINESS COACHING PROGRAMS 

AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES 

IT IS ORDERED that Settling Defendant is permanently restrained and enjoined 

from: 

A. Creating, advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling, or 

assisting others in creating, advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling 

any Business Coaching Program or any Investment Opportunity; 

B. Holding, directly or through a third-person, any ownership or other financial 

interest in any business entity that is creating, advertising, marketing, promoting, offering for 

sale, or selling, or that assists others in creating, advertising, marketing, promoting, offering 

for sale, or selling any Business Coaching Program, any Investment Opportunity, or any 

product to assist in the creation or development of a Business Coaching Program or an 

Investment Opportunity. 

Provided, however, that this section shall not prevent Settling Defendant from selling 

interests in real estate properties that he owns and manages. 

II. PROHIBITION AGAINST MISREPRESENTATIONS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendant, his officers, agents, employees, 

and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who 

receive actual notice of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with 

-5-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 6 of 28 PageID 8614 

the advertising, marketing, promoting, or offering for sale of any goods or services, are 

permanently restrained and enjoined from misrepresenting or assisting others in 

misrepresenting, expressly or by implication: 

A. That consumers who purchase Defendants’ goods or services will earn or are 

likely to earn substantial income; 

B. That purchases of Defendants’ goods or services are refundable without 

conditions; and 

C. Any other fact material to consumers concerning any good or service, such as: 

the total costs; any refund policy; any material restrictions, limitations, or conditions; or any 

material aspect of its performance, efficacy, nature, or central characteristics. 

III. MONETARY JUDGMENT AND PARTIAL SUSPENSION 

A. Judgment in the amount of Three Hundred Eighteen Million, Five Hundred 

Twelve Thousand, Three Hundred Thirty Six Dollars ($318,512,336) is entered in favor of 

the Commission against the Settling Defendant as equitable monetary relief. 

B. Effective upon entry of this Order, Settling Defendant shall surrender to the 

Receiver all control, title, dominion and interest in the assets or properties listed below: 

1. Costa Rica Resort Property; 

2. Fiji Resort Property; and 

3. Kuala Lumpur Properties. 

C. Settling Defendant represents, individually and on behalf of Related Entities, 

that he and the Related Entities shall maintain and take no action to diminish the value of any 

asset or property referenced in Subsection B, including adding or removing any structures, 

-6-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 7 of 28 PageID 8615 

fixtures, or appurtenances thereto. 

D. Settling Defendant shall cooperate fully with the Receiver and take such steps 

as the Receiver may require, including executing any documents and providing any 

information, documents and signatures the Receiver may deem necessary, to effectuate the 

assignment, transfer, sale and liquidation of the assets or properties referenced in Subsection 

B above. 

E. Settling Defendant further agrees, individually and on behalf of the Related 

Entities, that as of the date on which he signs this Order, he shall refrain from transferring, 

converting, encumbering, selling, assigning, or otherwise disposing of the assets or properties 

referenced in Subsection B, except with the express prior written permission of the Receiver. 

F. The Receiver shall, as soon as practicable, commence the sale of the 

unliquidated assets identified in Subsection B above and surrendered pursuant to this Order 

using a commercially reasonable procedure, subject to the limitations set forth in the prior 

orders of the Court. The Receiver shall hold the proceeds from the sale of these assets (net of 

costs and fees) for future transfer to the Commission in accordance with further instructions 

from the Court. 

G. In addition to the transfers specified in Subsection B above, immediately upon 

entry of this Order, Settling Defendant, for himself and on behalf of the MOBE Corporate 

Defendants and any of the Related Entities, is ordered to surrender to the Commission all 

control, title, dominion, and interest he has to the following assets: 

1. All funds held by the Receiver, including: 

a) Deposits totaling approximately $839,421 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Bank of America, N.A., that were frozen and 

-7-
 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 8 of 28 PageID 8616 

transferred to the Receiver; 

b) Deposits totaling approximately $55,951 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., that were frozen and 

transferred to the Receiver; 

c) Deposits totaling approximately $10,000 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Regions Bank, that were frozen and transferred to 

the Receiver; 

d) Deposits totaling approximately $19,213 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Branch Banking & Trust Company, that were frozen 

and transferred to the Receiver; 

e) Deposits totaling approximately $4,995 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Aquesta Bank, that were frozen and transferred to 

the Receiver; 

f) Deposits totaling approximately $1,081 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Fifth Third Bank, that were frozen and transferred to 

the Receiver; 

g) Deposits totaling approximately $665 from Defendants’ 

accounts at First Citizens Bank, that were frozen and transferred 

to the Receiver; 

h) Deposits totaling approximately $76,050 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Malayan Bank (Maybank) in Malaysia, that were 

repatriated and transferred to the Receiver; 

i) Deposits totaling approximately $237,763 from Defendants’ 

accounts at United Overseas Bank (UOB) in Malaysia, that 

were repatriated and transferred to the Receiver; 

j) Deposits totaling approximately $107,161 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Royal Bank of Canada (RBC) in Canada, that were 

repatriated and transferred to the Receiver; 

k) Deposits totaling approximately $18,974 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Westpac Banking Corporation in Australia, that 

were repatriated and transferred to the Receiver; 

l) Deposits totaling approximately $199,133 from Settling 

Defendant’s and Related Entities’ accounts at Development 

-8-
Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 9 of 28 PageID 8617 

Bank of Singapore (DBS), that were repatriated and transferred 

to the Receiver; 

m) Deposits totaling approximately $31,852 from Defendants’ 

accounts at National Australia Bank in Australia, that were 

repatriated and transferred to the Receiver; 

n) Deposits totaling approximately $335,475 from Defendants’ 

accounts at Credicorp Bank in Panama, that were repatriated 

and transferred to the Receiver; 

o) Funds totaling approximately $1,169,692 from Settling 

Defendant’s or Related Entities’ accounts at Vanguard 

Investments in Australia, that were repatriated and transferred to 

the Receiver; 

p) Funds totaling approximately $17,233 from Defendants’ 

accounts at PayPal Holdings, Inc. that were frozen and 

transferred to the Receiver; 

q) Funds totaling approximately $1,903 from Defendants’ accounts 

at Square, Inc. that were frozen and transferred to the Receiver; 

r) Funds totaling approximately $2,955 from Defendants’ accounts 

at Stripe that were frozen and transferred to the Receiver; 

s) Funds totaling approximately $144,233 from Defendants’ 

accounts at International Payout Systems a/k/a Guardian Escrow 

Corp. that were transferred to the Receiver; 

t) Funds totaling approximately $193,505 from Cash Network that 

were transferred to the Receiver; 

u) Funds totaling approximately $148,490 from Offer Blueprint 

that were transferred to the Receiver; 

v) Funds totaling approximately $49,652 recovered in the action 

titled MOBE Ltd. v. Loudoun et al. (Supreme Court of British 

Columbia, File No. S1510710) and transferred by David F. 

Sutherland & Associates to the Receiver; 

w) Credit card reserve funds totaling approximately $6,314,342 

from Synovus Bank and Qualpay, Inc. that were frozen and 

transferred to the Receiver; 

-9-
 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 10 of 28 PageID 8618 

x) Credit card reserve funds totaling approximately $2,096,967 

from Allied Wallet Inc. and Allied Wallet Ltd. that were frozen 

and transferred to the Receiver; 

y) Credit card reserve funds totaling approximately $3,051,048 

from Electronic Merchant Services (EMS) that were frozen and 

transferred to the Receiver; 

z) Credit card reserve funds totaling approximately $607,000 from 

Peoples Trust Company in Canada transferred to the Receiver; 

and 

aa) Credit card reserve funds totaling approximately $211,357 from 

Priority Payment Systems and Card Payment Systems that were 

frozen and transferred to the Receiver. 

2. All other assets or funds held in any accounts in the name of the 

MOBE Corporate Defendants or Receivership Entities; 

3. All cash held by the Receiver; 

4. All interest payments on deposits or funds held by the Receiver; 

5. All other funds held by any other party or entity on behalf of or for the 

benefit of Settling Defendant, any MOBE Corporate Defendant or Receivership Entity; 

6. All funds associated with credits, debits, or charges made by or on 

behalf of Settling Defendant or any Receivership Entity, including reserve funds held by 

payment processors, credit card processors, merchant banks, acquiring banks, independent 

sales organizations, third party processors, payment gateways, insurance companies, or other 

entities. Such funds include, without limitation: (i) funds held or controlled by Credicorp 

Bank, S.A. (“Credicorp”); and (iii) funds held or controlled by Transact Europe JSC or 

Transact Europe EAD (collectively, “Transact Europe”), including funds associated with the 

merchant account number ending in 41394. 

-10-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 11 of 28 PageID 8619 

H. To the extent they are not already in the possession of the Receiver, Settling 

Defendant shall deliver the assets identified in Subsection G above to the Receiver within 7 

days of the entry of this Order. 

I. Settling Defendant grants to the Commission all rights and claims he has to 

any other assets in the possession of the Receiver. 

J. Upon completion of all payments, surrenders, assignments, and transfers set 

forth in Subsections B and G, the remainder of the judgment is suspended as to Settling 

Defendant, subject to the Subsections K through M directly below. 

K. The Commission’s agreement to the suspension of part of the judgment is 

expressly premised upon the truthfulness, accuracy, and completeness of Settling 

Defendant’s sworn financial statements and related documents (collectively, “financial 

representations”) submitted to the Commission, namely: 

1. the Financial Statement of Settling Defendant signed on June 17, 2018, 

including the attachments; 

2. the Financial Statement of MOBE Ltd. signed by Settling Defendant, 

as MOBE Ltd.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, including the attachments; 

3. the Financial Statement of MobeProcessing.com, Inc. signed by 

Settling Defendant, as MobeProcessing.com, Inc.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, including the 

attachments; 

4. the Financial Statement of Transaction Management USA, Inc. signed 

by Settling Defendant, as Transaction Management USA, Inc.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, 

including the attachments; 

-11-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 12 of 28 PageID 8620 

5. the Financial Statement of MobeTraining.com, Inc. signed by Settling 

Defendant, as MobeTraining.com, Inc.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, including the attachments; 

6. the Financial Statement of 9336-0311 Quebec Inc. d/b/a Business 

Education Training signed by Settling Defendant, as 9336-0311 Quebec Inc.’s CEO, on June 

17, 2018, including the attachments; 

7. the Financial Statement of MOBE Pro Ltd. signed by Settling 

Defendant, as MOBE Pro Ltd.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, including the attachments; 

8. the Financial Statement of MOBE Online Ltd. signed by Settling 

Defendant, as MOBE Online Ltd.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, including the attachments; 

9. the Financial Statement of MattLloydPublishing.com Pty Ltd. signed 

by Settling Defendant, as MattLloydPublishing.com Pty Ltd.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, 

including the attachments; 

10. the Financial Statement of Corporate Defendant MOBE Inc. signed by 

Settling Defendant, as MOBE Inc.’s CEO, on June 17, 2018, including the attachments; 

11. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant’s 

counsel DJ Poyfair to Commission counsel Sung W. Kim, Benjamin R. Davidson, and 

Bikram Bandy on July 9, 2018 at approximately 10:57 AM EDT, attaching a letter 

identifying funds to be repatriated as of July 9, 2018; 

12. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant’s 

counsel DJ Poyfair to Commission counsel Sung W. Kim, Benjamin R. Davidson, and 

Bikram Bandy on July 16, 2018 at approximately 11:31 AM EDT, including information 

regarding funds and deposits available in Malaysian bank accounts and Vanguard investment 

-12-
 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 13 of 28 PageID 8621 

account as of July 16, 2018; 

13. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant’s 

counsel Andrew Cove to Commission counsel Sung W. Kim, Benjamin R. Davidson, and 

Bikram Bandy on August 31, 2018 at approximately 11:44 AM EDT, attaching eight files 

relating to the Fiji Resort Property titled A2 KDPL.pdf, agreement1photo.jpeg, 

agreementphoto.jpeg, Company Information Form A2.pdf, Investment Certificate and 

Letter.pdf, NL 25143 – Bounty Island.pdf, Sale Purchase Agreement Sala Levu Resort Fiji 

Ltd.pdf, and Stamped Transfer of Shares.pdf; 

14. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant’s 

counsel Andrew Cove to the Receiver Mark Bernet on September 4, 2018 at approximately 

12:49 PM EDT, attaching four files relating to MOBE Entities Financials from 2015 to 2018 

titled MOBE Entities Financials (USD) – FYE 2016.xlsx, MOBE Entities Financials (USD) 

– FYE 2015.xlsx, MOBE Entities Financials (USD) – FYE 2017.xlsx, and MOBE Entities 

FS (USD) – YTDApr&May2018.xlsx; 

15. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant’s 

counsel Andrew Cove to Commission counsel Sung W. Kim, Benjamin R. Davidson, and 

Bikram Bandy on October 17, 2018 at approximately 1:12 PM EDT, attaching four files 

relating to the Fiji Resort Property, Costa Rica Resort Property, and the Kuala Lumpur 

Properties titled Fiji Attorney Summary.pdf, Costa Rica Attorney Summary.pdf, Contract 

dated 10-12-16.pdf, and Contract dated 11-24-17.pdf; 

16. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant’s 

counsel Andrew Cove to Commission counsel Sung W. Kim, Benjamin R. Davidson, and 

-13-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 14 of 28 PageID 8622 

Bikram Bandy on October 25, 2018 at approximately 6:03 PM EDT, attaching one file 

disclosing information relating to the Fiji Resort Property, Costa Rica Resort Property, and 

the Kuala Lumpur Properties; 

17. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim, Benjamin R. Davidson, and Bikram Bandy 

on February 2, 2019 at approximately 11:31 AM EDT, including information relating to 

MOBE Ltd.’s tax obligations in Malaysia, the Related Entities, and Costa Rica Resort 

Property; 

18. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to 

Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on February 27, 2019 at 

approximately 10:25 AM EDT, including information relating to MOBE Ltd.’s tax 

obligations in Malaysia; 

19. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to 

Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 2, 2019 at 

approximately 10:46 AM EDT, including information relating to MOBE Ltd.’s tax refund; 

20. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 3, 2019 

at approximately 4:22 PM EDT, attaching six files relating to the Costa Rica Resort Property 

titled MTO 1905031225.pdf, D101 CAIF 2018 (3).xls., MAR Y TIERRA DEK OESTE 

MTO S.A. – ESTADO DE CUENTA.pdf, CAIF PROPERTY HOLDING DE COSTA RICA 

S.A – ESTADO DE CUENTA.pdf, Detalle_101_1_1012633622856 (1).pdf, and 

Acuse_101_1_1012633622856 (1).pdf; 

-14-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 15 of 28 PageID 8623 

21. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 3, 2019 

at approximately 4:25 PM EDT, attaching five files relating to the Fiji Resort Property titled 

AP AGEING MARCH 19.xlsx, Bank Statement Summary.xlsx, Balance Sheet as at 

31.03.19.xlsx, INCOME STATEMENT MARCH 2019.xlsx, and P&L Report.xlsx; 

22. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 9, 2019 

at approximately 8:11 PM EDT, attaching three files relating to the Fiji Resort Property titled 

BSP_81682534_Stmt.pdf, SLRFL – 81933894.pdf, and BSP_81653738_Stmt-1.pdf; 

23. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 11, 

2019 at approximately 4:55 PM EDT, attaching eight files relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property titled allbacstatementscolusdandcreditcardssoct2018.apr.zip, 200-02-137-003373-

2.csv, 100-01-079-002165-0.csv, 100-02-079-600227-0.png, 100-02-079-600226-1.png, 200-

02-137-003373-2.png, All Accounts.png, and 100-01-079-002165-0.png; 

24. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant’s 

counsel Andrew Cove to the Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin 

R. Davidson on May 14, 2019 at approximately 11:52 AM EDT, including information 

relating to the Fiji Report Property, Costa Rica Resort Property, the Kuala Lumpur Properties 

and MOBE Ltd.’s tax obligation; 

25. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 16, 

-15-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 16 of 28 PageID 8624 

2019 at approximately 11:10 AM EDT, including information relating MOBE Ltd.’s tax 

refund; 

26. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 20, 

2019 at approximately 4:01 PM EDT, attaching one file relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property titled Financial Info thru April.xlsx; 

27. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 22, 

2019 at approximately 5:11 PM EDT, attaching one file relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property titled MTO 1905031225.pdf; 

28. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 29, 

2019 at approximately 6:12 PM EDT, attaching seven files relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property titled BN balance 28th May.png, Judicial.Files – (CAIF).xlsx, ice-recent may 

payment.jpg, BAC balance 28th May.png, Previous 2 weeks reservations.png, next2weeksreservations.JPG, and MTO 1905031225.pdf; 

29. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on May 31, 

2019 at approximately 3:27 PM EDT, including information relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property and Kuala Lumpur Properties; 

30. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on June 3, 2019 

-16-
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 17 of 28 PageID 8625 

at approximately 3:55 PM EDT, including information relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property, Fiji Resort Property and Kuala Lumpur Properties; 

31. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on June 4, 2019 

at approximately 4:51 PM EDT, including information relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property, Fiji Resort Property and Kuala Lumpur Properties; 

32. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to 

Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on June 11, 2019 at 

approximately 4:16 PM EDT, including information relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property, Fiji Resort Property and Kuala Lumpur Properties; 

33. the documentation submitted via email from Settling Defendant to the 

Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson on June 12, 

2019 at approximately 2:01 PM EDT, including information relating to the Costa Rica Resort 

Property and Fiji Resort Property; 

34. the documentation and information submitted via email from Settling 

Defendantto the Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson 

on June 19, 2019 at approximately 1:05 PM EDT, including information relating to the Kuala 

Lumpur Properties, the Fiji Resort Property and tax refund; 

35. the documentation and information submitted via email from Settling 

Defendantto the Receiver and Commission counsel Sung W. Kim and Benjamin R. Davidson 

on June 24, 2019 at approximately 1:04 PM EDT, including information relating to the Fiji 

Resort Property; 

-17-
 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 18 of 28 PageID 8626 

36. the documentation and information submitted via email from Settling 

Defendant’s counsel Andrew Cove to the Receiver on June 27, 2019 at approximately 1:45 

PM EDT, including information relating to the Fiji Resort Property and Kuala Lumpur 

Properties; 

37. the amended or supplemental financial information submitted via 

email (see Section 5 of email) from Settling Defendant to Commission counsel Sung W. Kim 

and Benjamin R. Davidson and the Receiver on July 3, 2019 at approximately 2:35 PM EDT; 

and 

38. the documentation and information submitted via email from Settling 

Defendant to the Receiver on July 8, 2019 at approximately 3:26 PM EDT, including 

information relating to a tax refund in Australia. 

L. The suspension of the judgment will be lifted if, upon motion by the 

Commission, the Court finds that Settling Defendant failed to disclose any material asset, 

materially misstated the value of any asset, or made any other material misstatement or 

omission in the financial representations identified above, or that Settling Defendant is in 

default on any obligation under Section III. 

M. If the suspension of the judgment is lifted, the judgment becomes immediately 

due in the amount specified in Subsection A above (which the parties stipulate only for 

purposes of this Section represents the consumer injury alleged in the Complaint), less any 

payment previously made pursuant to this Section, and any payment(s) made by or on behalf 

of any other Defendants to the Commission pursuant to a final order in this action as to such 

Defendant, plus interest computed from the date of entry of this Order. 

-18-
 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 19 of 28 PageID 8627 

IV. ADDITIONAL MONETARY PROVISIONS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 

A. Settling Defendant relinquishes dominion and all legal and equitable right, 

title, and interest in all assets transferred pursuant to this Order and may not seek the return 

of any assets. 

B. The facts alleged in the Complaint will be taken as true, without further proof, 

in any subsequent civil litigation by or on behalf of the Commission, including in a 

proceeding to enforce its rights to any payment or monetary judgment pursuant to this Order, 

such as a nondischargeability complaint in any bankruptcy case. 

C. The facts alleged in the Complaint establish all elements necessary to sustain 

an action by the Commission pursuant to Section 523(a)(2)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 

U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A), and this Order will have collateral estoppel effect for such purposes. 

D. Settling Defendant acknowledges that his Taxpayer Identification Number, 

which Settling Defendant must submit to the Commission, may be used for collecting and 

reporting on any delinquent amount arising out of this Order, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. § 

7701. 

E. All money paid to the Commission pursuant to this Order may be deposited 

into a fund administered by the Commission or its designee to be used for equitable relief, 

including consumer redress and any attendant expenses for the administration of any redress 

fund. If a representative of the Commission decides that direct redress to consumers is 

wholly or partially impracticable or money remains after redress is completed, the 

Commission may apply any remaining money for such other equitable relief (including 

-19-
 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 20 of 28 PageID 8628 

consumer information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to Defendants’ 

practices alleged in the Complaint. Any money not used for such equitable relief is to be 

deposited to the U.S. Treasury as disgorgement. Settling Defendant has no right to challenge 

any actions the Commission or its representatives may take pursuant to this Subsection. 

F. The asset freeze is modified to permit the cash payments, assignments, 

transfers, sale or liquidation identified in Section III above. Upon completion of all such 

transfers, the asset freeze is dissolved as to the Settling Defendant. 

V. CUSTOMER INFORMATION 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendant, his officers, agents, employees, 

and attorneys, and all other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who 

receive actual notice of this Order are permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or 

indirectly: 

A. Failing to provide sufficient customer information to enable the Commission 

to efficiently administer consumer redress. If a representative of the Commission requests in 

writing any information related to redress, Settling Defendant must provide it, in the form 

prescribed by the Commission, within 14 days; and 

B. Disclosing, using, or benefitting from customer information, including the 

name, address, telephone number, email address, Social Security number, other identifying 

information, or any data that enables access to a customer’s account (including a credit card, 

bank account, or other financial account), that any Defendant obtained prior to entry of this 

Order in connection with any activity that pertains to the sale of any Business Coaching 

Program or Investment Opportunity; and 

-20-
 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 21 of 28 PageID 8629 

C. Failing to destroy such customer information in all forms in his possession, 

custody, or control within 30 days after receipt of written direction to do so from a 

representative of the Commission. 

Provided, however, that customer information need not be disposed of, and may be 

disclosed, to the extent requested by a government agency or required by law, regulation, or 

court order. 

VI. COOPERATION 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendant must fully cooperate with 

representatives of the Commission in this case and in any investigation related to or 

associated with the transactions or the occurrences that are the subject of the Complaint. 

Settling Defendant must provide truthful and complete information, evidence, and testimony. 

Settling Defendant must appear for interviews, discovery, hearings, trials, and any other 

proceedings that a Commission representative may reasonably request upon 5 days written 

notice, or other reasonable notice, at such places and times as a Commission representative 

may designate, without the service of a subpoena. 

VII. ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendant obtain acknowledgments of 

receipt of this Order: 

A. Settling Defendant, within 7 days of entry of this Order, must submit to the 

Commission an acknowledgment of receipt of this Order sworn under penalty of perjury. 

B. For 20 years after entry of this Order, Settling Defendant, for any business that 

he, individually or collectively with any other Defendants, is the majority owner or controls 

-21-
 

 

 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 22 of 28 PageID 8630 

directly or indirectly, must deliver a copy of this Order to: (1) all principals, officers, 

directors, and LLC managers and members; (2) all employees having managerial 

responsibilities for conduct related to the subject matter of the Order and all agents and 

representatives who participate in conduct related to the subject matter of the Order; and (3) 

any business entity resulting from any change in structure as set forth in the Section titled 

Compliance Reporting. Delivery must occur within 7 days of entry of this Order for current 

personnel. For all others, delivery must occur before they assume their responsibilities. 

C. From each individual or entity to which the Settling Defendant delivered a 

copy of this Order, Settling Defendant must obtain, within 30 days, a signed and dated 

acknowledgment of receipt of this Order. 

IX. COMPLIANCE REPORTING 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendant make timely submissions to the 

Commission: 

A. One year after entry of this Order, Settling Defendant must submit a 

compliance report, sworn under penalty of perjury: 

1. Settling Defendant must: (a) identify the primary physical, postal, and 

email address and telephone number, as designated points of contact, which representatives 

of the Commission may use to communicate with Settling Defendant; (b) identify all of 

Settling Defendant’s businesses by all of their names, telephone numbers, and physical, 

postal, email, and Internet addresses; (c) describe the activities of each business, including 

the goods and services offered, the means of advertising, marketing, and sales, and the 

involvement of any other Defendant (which Settling Defendant must describe if he knows or 

-22-
 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 23 of 28 PageID 8631 

should know due to his own involvement); (d) describe in detail whether and how Settling 

Defendant is in compliance with each Section of this Order; and (e) provide a copy of each 

Order Acknowledgment obtained pursuant to this Order, unless previously submitted to the 

Commission. 

2. Additionally, Settling Defendant must: (a) identify all telephone 

numbers and all physical, postal, email and Internet addresses, including all residences; (b) 

identify all business activities, including any business for which Settling Defendant performs 

services whether as an employee or otherwise and any entity in which Settling Defendant has 

any ownership interest; and (c) describe in detail his involvement in each such business, 

including title, role, responsibilities, participation, authority, control, and any ownership. 

B. For 20 years after entry of this Order, Settling Defendant must submit a 

compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 14 days of any change in the 

following: 

1. Settling Defendant must report any change in: (a) any designated 

point of contact; or (b) the structure of any entity that Settling Defendant has any ownership 

interest in or controls directly or indirectly that may affect compliance obligations arising 

under this Order, including: creation, merger, sale, or dissolution of the entity or any 

subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages in any acts or practices subject to this Order. 

2. Additionally, Settling Defendant must report any change in: (a) name, 

including aliases or fictitious name, or residence address; or (b) title or role in any business 

activity, including any business for which Settling Defendant performs services whether as 

an employee or otherwise and any entity in which Settling Defendant has any ownership 

-23-
 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 24 of 28 PageID 8632 

interest, and identify the name, physical address, and any Internet address of the business or 

entity. 

C. Settling Defendant must submit to the Commission notice of the filing of any 

bankruptcy petition, insolvency proceeding, or similar proceeding by or against Settling 

Defendant within 14 days of its filing. 

D. Any submission to the Commission required by this Order to be sworn under 

penalty of perjury must be true and accurate and comply with 28 U.S.C. § 1746, such as by 

concluding: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 

America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: _____” and supplying the date, 

signatory’s full name, title (if applicable), and signature. 

E. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all 

submissions to the Commission pursuant to this Order must be emailed to DEbrief@ftc.gov 

or sent by overnight courier (not the U.S. Postal Service) to: Associate Director for 

Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580. The subject line must begin: FTC v. MOBE, et al. 

(MOBE), No. X180034. 

X. RECORDKEEPING 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Settling Defendant must create certain records for 

20 years after entry of the Order, and retain each such record for 5 years. Specifically, 

Settling Defendant, for any business that he, individually or collectively with any other 

Defendants, is a majority owner or controls directly or indirectly, must create and retain the 

following records: 

-24-
 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 25 of 28 PageID 8633 

A. Accounting records showing the revenues from all goods or services sold; 

B. Personnel records showing, for each person providing services, whether as an 

employee or otherwise, that person’s: name; addresses; telephone numbers; job title or 

position; dates of service; and (if applicable) the reason for termination; 

C. Records of all consumer complaints and refund requests, whether received 

directly or indirectly, such as through a third party, and any response; 

D. All records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each provision of 

this Order, including all submissions to the Commission; and 

E. A copy of each unique advertisement or other marketing material. 

XI. COMPLIANCE MONITORING 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the purpose of monitoring Settling Defendant’s 

compliance with this Order, including the financial representations upon which part of the 

judgment was suspended, and any failure to transfer any assets as required by this Order: 

A. Within 14 days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the 

Commission, Settling Defendant must: submit additional compliance reports or other 

requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury; appear for depositions; 

and produce documents for inspection and copying. The Commission is also authorized to 

obtain discovery, without further leave of court, using any of the procedures prescribed by 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 29, 30 (including telephonic depositions), 31, 33, 34, 36, 

45, and 69. 

B. For matters concerning this Order, the Commission is authorized to 

communicate directly with Settling Defendant. Settling Defendant must permit 

-25-
 

 

 

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 26 of 28 PageID 8634 

representatives of the Commission to interview any employee or other person affiliated with 

any Defendant who has agreed to such an interview. The person interviewed may have 

counsel present. 

C. The Commission may use all other lawful means, including posing, through 

its representatives as consumers, suppliers, or other individuals or entities, to Settling 

Defendant or any individual or entity affiliated with Settling Defendant, without the necessity 

of identification or prior notice. Nothing in this Order limits the Commission’s lawful use of 

compulsory process, pursuant to Sections 9 and 20 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 49, 57b-1. 

D. Upon written request from a representative of the Commission, any consumer 

reporting agency must furnish consumer reports concerning Settling Defendant, pursuant to 

Section 604(1) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681b(a)(1). 

XII. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for 

purposes of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order. 

SO ORDERED, this ____day of ________________, 2019. 

ROY B. DALTON, JR. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

-26-
SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

FOR TIIE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: 

Date: ---- Sung W. Kim 

Benjamin R. Davidson 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, CC-8528 

Washington, DC 20580 

(202) 326-22 11 I skim6@ftc.gov 

(202) 326-3055 I bdavidson@ftc.gov 

(202) 326-3395 (fax) 

A llorneys for Plaintiff 

Federal Trade Commission 

FOR DEFENDA T MATTHEW LLOYD MCPHEE: ,4 / 

oa1e 'fC(lf~zod / "'~ 

Matthew Lloyd McPhee, individually 

8.30.2019 version 

-27-

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 27 of 28 PageID 8635 
SO STIPULATED AND AGREED: 

FOR THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: 

Date: fa..,..,.,.r} 12, Z-02.[) 

Benjamin R. Davidson 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, CC-8528 

Washington, DC 20580 

(202) 326-2211 / skim6@ftc.gov 

(202) 326-3055 I bdavidson@ftc.gov 

(202) 326-3395 (fax) 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Federal Trade Commission 

FOR DEFENDANT MATTHEW LLOYD MCPHEE: 

Date: ---- Matthew Lloyd McPhee, individually 

8.30.2019 version 

-27-

Case 6:18-cv-00862-RBD-DCI Document 256-1 Filed 02/12/20 Page 28 of 28 PageID 8636