alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                            2,208
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1,249
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1,236
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    594
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       3,277
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            1,765
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              1,787
<LOANS>                                          31,691
<ALLOWANCE>                                       (704)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   46,083
<DEPOSITS>                                       30,009
<SHORT-TERM>                                      6,700
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1,702
<LONG-TERM>                                       2,059
<COMMON>                                            252
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                         508
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   46,083
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   2,394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   250
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    606
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  3,250
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1,179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,951
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             1,299
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       175
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                    7
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     734
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          399
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      3.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      3.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     4.48
<LOANS-NON>                                         355
<LOANS-PAST>                                          8
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     27
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    680
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (167)
<RECOVERIES>                                         42
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   704
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                420
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 177
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             107
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH J. SCHIRO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. STEPHEN CLARK, Sgt.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 15

- 15266

D.C. No. 3:10

- c v - 00203

- RCJ

- VPC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Nevada state prisoner Kenneth J. Schiro appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional
claims, including a due process violation in connection with a disciplinary hearing.
We have jurisdict ion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 21 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 15266

the basis of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion

. Garity v. APWU Nat’l Labor
Org. , 828 F.3d 848, 854 (9th Cir. 2016) . We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Schiro’s due process claim against

defendant Clark because Schiro is collaterally estopped from relitigating issues
relating to his April 7, 2008 disciplinary hearing that the Nevada courts resolved

. See Allen v. McCurry , 449 U.S. 90, 97

- 98 (1980) (federal claim collaterally
estopped by prior state court litigation) ; Arduini v. Hart , 774 F.3d 622, 629 (9th

Cir. 2014) (elements of issue preclusion under Nevada law).
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Schiro’s motion to
appoint counsel because Schiro did not demonstrate exceptional circumstances.

See Terrell v. Brewer , 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991) (standard of review and
requirements for appointment of counsel).

We do not consider the dismissal of Schiro’s other claims because Schiro
does not raise any arguments about those claims in his opening brief

. See Smith v.

Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[A]rguments not raised by a party in
its opening brief are deemed waived.”)

. We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’ s post

- judgment order
denying Sc hiro’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion because Schiro3 15

- 15266

failed to file an amended or separate notice of appeal. See Whitaker v. Garcetti , 486 F.3d 572, 585 (9th Cir. 2007) (appellant generally must file a separate notice
of appeal or amend a previously filed notice of appeal to secure review of a post

judgment order).

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 14, 2020

N o. 04

- 20

- 00172

- CR

Bruce JONES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas

, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CR

- 5212

Honorable Andrew Wyatt Carruthers, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on October 14, 2020.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of October, 2020

.

_________________________________ Michael A. Cruz , Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7747 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7747

 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress an 
annual report on the Solid Start program of the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2020

    Ms. Kelly of Illinois (for herself and Mr. Mast) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress an 
annual report on the Solid Start program of the Department of Veterans 
                    Affairs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORTING ON SOLID START PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    (a) Reports Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs shall submit to the Committees on Veterans' Affairs of 
the Senate and House of Representatives a report on the Solid Start 
program of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
    (b) Elements.--Each report under subsection (a) shall include the 
following:
            (1) With respect to each veteran called or emailed under 
        the Solid Start program:
                    (A) The Armed Force of the veteran.
                    (B) Age.
                    (C) Gender.
                    (D) Whether the veteran responded to the call or 
                email.
                    (E) Whether the call or email resulted in a call to 
                the Veterans Crisis Line established pursuant to 
                section 1720F(h) of title 38, United States Code.
                    (F) Whether the call or email resulted in a 
                referral to--
                            (i) compensation and pension determination;
                            (ii) enrollment in the patient enrollment 
                        system of the Department; or
                            (iii) any other program or benefit under 
                        the laws administered by the Secretary.
            (2) Any change to the Solid Start program implemented by 
        the Secretary since the date of the previous such report.
    (c) Prohibition on Personally Identifiable Information.--No report 
under subsection (a) may contain any personally identifiable 
information regarding a veteran.
                                 <all>
```
RPT_12.31.2013_EX 10.9






Exhibit 10.9


	
					
	SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR 

	THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 

	RAMCO-GERSHENSON PROPERTIES TRUST

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	The following table sets forth the compensation program for non-employee Trustees:
	 

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	Annual cash retainer (1)
	 
	$
	30,000
	


	Additional cash retainer:
	 
	 

	 
	Chairman
	100,000
	


	 
	Audit Committee chair
	7,500
	


	 
	Compensation Committee chair
	5,000
	


	 
	Nominating and Governance Committee chair
	5,000
	


	 
	Executive Committee chair
	2,500
	


	 
	Executive Committee members
	—
	


	 
	 
	 

	Annual equity retainer (value of restricted shares) (2)
	 
	50,000
	


	 
	 
	 






		
	(1) 
	The annual cash retainer is equal to $80,000 less the grant date fair value, which approximates $50,000, of the restricted shares granted in the applicable year.


		
	(2) 
	Grants are made under the Trust's 2012 LTIP.  The restricted shares vest over one year.  The grant is made on July 1st or, if not a business day, the business day prior to July 1st.  During 2013, 3,211 shares were granter per Trustee. 




The Trust also reimburses all Trustees for all expenses incurred in connection with attending any meetings or performing their duties as Trustees.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137550

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137550 COA: 286928 Jackson CC: 05-001235-FC ROBERT SCOT T REASTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 1, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
#### In re the ESTATE of Fairy Beaver CASSIL, Deceased.

No. 73-617.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 751 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 751

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2019

 Mr. Latta (for himself, Mr. Bacon, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Olson, Mr. Posey, 
Mr. Byrne, Mr. Norman, and Mr. Grothman) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in 
 addition to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Vote, No Raise Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 4501(2)) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 
4501) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``, as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 
December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-439-CV

1998 SATURN, 	APPELLANT

VIN 1G8ZH5282WZ106822

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Richard Tharpe attempts to appeal from the trial court’s judgment signed August 8, 2006.  Appellant did not file a postjudgment motion to extend the appellate deadline; his notice of appeal was therefore due September 7, 2006.2  But he did not file a notice of appeal until November 20, 2006.

	Because the notice of appeal was untimely, we sent a letter to Appellant requesting a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, as it appeared we lacked jurisdiction.3  Appellant’s response requesting a continuance did not show grounds for continuing the appeal.  Accordingly, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction.4

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  February 8, 2007
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
MARCH 2009

Sauer-Danfoss Inc.

Jurisdiction of
Formation

Business PurposeSauer-Danfoss (US) Company

Delaware

Manufacturing & SalesHydro-Gear, Inc.

Delaware

Holding CompanyHydro-Gear Limited Partnership

Illinois

Manufacturing & SalesTSD Integrated Controls LLC

Delaware

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss Pty Ltd.

Australia

SalesSauer-Danfoss BVBA

Belgium

SalesSauer-Danfoss Hidraulica Mobil Ltda.

Brazil

ManufacturingSauer-Danfoss Ltda.

Brazil

SalesSauer-Danfoss Shanghai Hydrostatic Transmission Co., Ltd.

China

ManufacturingSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Mobile Hydraulics (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.

China

SalesSauer-Danfoss Shanghai Co. Ltd.

China

ManufacturingSauer-Danfoss ApS

Denmark

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss Holding ApS

Denmark

Holding CompanySauer-Danfoss BV

Netherlands

SalesOy Sauer-Danfoss AB

Finland

SalesSauer-Danfoss S.A.S.

France

SalesSauer-Danfoss GmbH & Co. OHG

Germany

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss GmbH

Germany

Holding/Management CompanySauer-Danfoss Informatik GmbH

Germany

Information ServicesSauer-Danfoss India Private Limited

India

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss S.r.l.

Italy

Manufacturing & SalesDaikin-Sauer-Danfoss Manufacturing Ltd.

Japan

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Ltd.

Japan

SalesSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Ltd., Korea

Korea

SalesSauer-Danfoss A/S

Norway

SalesSauer-Danfoss sp.z.o.o.

Poland

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss LLC

Russia

SalesSauer-Danfoss-Daikin Pte. Ltd.

Singapore

SalesSauer-Danfoss a.s.

Slovakia

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss SA

Spain

SalesSauer-Danfoss AB

Sweden

Manufacturing & SalesSauer-Danfoss Limited

United Kingdom

Sales


---



QuickLinks
#### Dewey HILLIARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-346.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 16, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender; and John W. Watson, III, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*375Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen; and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Collins v. State, 83 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1955).

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      31.1**




Certification
      (pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)




I,
      Barry
      I. Regenstein certifying individual, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Command Security Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




4.
      I am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
      we
      have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this annual report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
      report (the “Evaluation Date”); and




c)
      presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;




5.
      I have
      disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and
      the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
      the equivalent function):




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
      could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize
      and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s’ auditors any
      material weakness in internal controls; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and




6.
      I have
      indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes
      in
      internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
      controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
      corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
      weaknesses.




Date:
      June 28, 2006




By: /s/
      Barry I. Regenstein


Barry
      I.
      Regenstein


Principal
      Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMAR  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM
CONSOLIDATED  UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S
JUNE 30, 1996 ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000865286
<NAME>                        ATC II, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 252,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          750,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,786
<OTHER-SE>                                    (548,344)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   252,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (110,138)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (110,138)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 31,500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    78,638
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)
        

</TABLE>