alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7828 

To permit vicarious liability claims against an employer of a person who, 

under color of law, subjects another to the deprivation of rights, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2020 

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To permit vicarious liability claims against an employer of 

a person who, under color of law, subjects another to 

the deprivation of rights, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Enhance5 ment and Law Enforcement Accountability Improvement 

6 Act of 2020’’. 

7 SEC. 2. VICARIOUS LIABILITY. 

8 Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 

9 1983) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7828 IH

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Every’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(b) In any action brought under subsection (a), the 

4 employer of a law enforcement officer acting under color 

5 of any law described in such subsection shall be vicariously 

6 liable for the acts or omissions of the officer committed 

7 within the scope of employment in the same manner and 

8 to the same extent as a private employer is liable for the 

9 negligent acts of its employee under the laws of the State, 

10 Territory, or the District of Columbia. For purposes of 

11 this subsection, a law enforcement officer acting under 

12 color of law shall be deemed to be acting within the course 

13 and scope of employment (regardless of whether the act 

14 of the law enforcement officer was unconstitutional). 

15 ‘‘(c) It shall not be a defense against any claim for 

16 vicarious liability under subsection (b) that a law enforce17 ment officer has immunity in any action against the law 

18 enforcement officer under subsection (a). Nothing in this 

19 section shall be construed as limiting, providing, or ex20 tending any extant immunity to a law enforcement officer. 

21 ‘‘(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to pre22 clude liability under any other theory of law for depriva23 tions actionable under subsection (a) caused by a law enVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:22 Aug 17, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7828.IH H7828

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7828 IH

1 forcement officer or an employer of such law enforcement 

2 officer.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Frank, McClanahan and Retired Judge Hodges* 

R.R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION** 

v. Record No. 0727-08-3 PER CURIAM 

 AUGUST 26, 2008 

MICHAEL RODGERS 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Richard D. Lucas; Lucas & Kite, PLC, on brief), for appellant. 

 (A. Thomas Lane, Jr., on brief), for appellee. 

 R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission finding that claimant has suffered anxiety, depression, a mild traumatic brain injury, 

and post-concussive syndrome causally related to his compensable October 9, 2005 work-related 

accident and that he has been totally disabled since February 2006. We have reviewed the record 

and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Rodgers v. R.R. Donnelley & 

Sons Co., VWC File No. 227-48-98 (Feb. 22, 2008). We dispense with oral argument and 

summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed.

 

 * Retired Judge William H. Hodges took part in the consideration of this case by 

designation pursuant to Code § 17.1-400(D). 

 ** Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
### FA A PAR T 1 6 AIRPOR T PROCEEDING S DOCKE T FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C v ^ O c



### ALCA , Inc. , Cylinde r

Shop , Inc. , Suncoas t Aviation , Aircraf

t Part s an dNational Aviation ,

Complainants , vs . Miami-Dad e County, Florid a

Respondent . Docket No . 16-08-0 5 

# m

.. 3 

# I ^ 

# i mI

P M AIRPORT S PART16D0CKFT R



### UNOPPOSED MOTIO N FO REXTENSIO N O FTIM ET O FIL EREPL Y BRIE F Petitioners , hereb y file thi s Motio n for Extensio n of

Tim e t o Fil e Reply Brie f an di n suppor t

thereo f woul dshow : 1 . Petitioner s hav e filed aPar t 1 6 Complain t

agains t Miam i Dad e County ; 2 . Th e County filedit s respons e afte r aseveral monthdela

y an d receive daseveral monthtim e extension ; 3 . O n Octobe r

7,2008 , undersigne dcounse l assume ddutie s a s Mayo r o f Miami Lake s i n Dad e County an dha s been require dt o spen dmuc ho f Octobe r 200 8 assumin g thos e duties ; 4 . Undersig n counse l ba dsough t extension s i n al l o f

hi s pendin g cases , unti l sometime i n earl y mi dNovember , du e t o thes e circumstances ; 5 . Ther e hav e been some change s i n th e statu s o f th e partie s withi n th e pas t thirt y (30 ) day s tha t

nee dt o b e accounte dfor

i n preparin g areply ; 6 . A final extensio n on amatte r of thi s importance , will no t

prejudic e areply ;7 . Thi s matte r involve s multipl e partie s an dongoin g developmen t issue s tha t hav e decade s o f

history ; 8 . Th e repl y i s th e petitioner s fina l opportunit y t o documen t thei r complaints ; 9 . Undersigne dcounse l spok e wit hth e assistan t Count y attorney , Davi d Murray , wh o indicate dth e Count y doe s no t oppos e a n extensio n o f

tim e unti l Decembe r

1,2008 , fo r

th e petitioner s t o f9 e thei r repl y brief ; 10 . Petitioner s ar e requestin g unti l Decembe r 1,2008 , t o file thei r

repl y brief . WHEREFORE : undersig n counse l an dpetitioner s reques t a n extensio n o f

u p unti l Decembe r

1 , 200 8 t o submi t

thei r repl y brie f

i n thi s matter .

Respectfull y submitted , MICHAE LA . PIZZI , Jr. , P.A . Attorne y fo r

Defendan t 1527 1 N W60 * Avenu e Miam i Lakes , F l 3301 6 Phone : 30 5 231212 1 FAX : 30 5 231212 3 E-mail : mpizziir(%vahoo.co m By : Michae l A . Pizzi , Jr. , Esq . Florid aBa r

No . 07954 5

### CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t acop y o f

th e abov e Motio n fo r

Extensio n o f

Tim e t o Fil e Repl y Brie f

wa s maile dto : Offic e o f th e Chie f

Counse l Attn : FA A Par t

1 6 Airpor t

Proceeding s Docke t 16-08-0 5 Roo m925 , Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S W Washington , D C 2059 1

Jennife r Trock , Esq^ Pillsbur y Winthro p Sha w Pittman , LL P 230 0 N . Street , N W Washington , D C 2003 7 Davi dMurray , Esq . Count y Attorne y P.O . Bo x 02550 4 Miami , F L33102-550 4



### By : I

^ - • 

### Michae l A . Pizzi , Jr. , Esq .
#### Patricia RIDGWAY, Appellant, v. Alvin RIDGWAY, Jr., Appellee.

No. 73-432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 10440]

The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a conference call on Thursday, June 28, 2018, from 11:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. This will be a teleconference meeting to consider the recommendations of the Commission's National Committee for the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC). The Commission will accept brief oral comments during a portion of this conference call. The public comment period will be limited to approximately 10 minutes in total, with two minutes allowed per speaker. For more information, or to arrange to participate in the conference call, individuals must make arrangements with the Executive Director of the National Commission by June 26, 2018.

                    The National Commission may be contacted via email at                     *DCUNESCO@state.gov.*

Paul T. Mungai,

Acting Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2018-12504 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
In the Matter of 

ECM BioFilms, Inc., 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

DOCKET NO. 9358 

a corporation, also d/b/a 

Enviroplastics International, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 

IN CAMERA TREATMENT 

ORIGINAL 

PUBLIC 

On August 26, 2014, non-party Google Inc. ("Google") filed a Motion for In Camera 

Treatment of Testimony Regarding Competitively Sensitive Business Information ("Motion"). 

The Motion is DENIED, as explained below: 

Complaint Counsel served a subpoena ad testificandum on Google seeking testimony 

from Mr. Paul McDonald, a Google Product Manager. Complaint Counsel's motion for leave to 

present testimony from Mr. McDonald after Complaint Counsel had completed its case-in-chief 

was denied. Order Denying Complaint Counsel's Motion for Leave to Call Rebuttal Fact 

Witnesses and Respondent's Request to Bar Rebuttal Expert Witness (September 5, 2014). By 

Order dated September 4, 2014, the record in this case was closed. Accordingly, Mr. McDonald 

will not present any testimony in this proceeding. 

Under Federal Trade Commission Rule 3.45, an in camera order is only applicable to 

confidential information "offered into evidence" at the hearing. 16 C.P.R. § 3.45(b). Because 

the testimony of Mr. McDonald will not be offered into evidence, no in camera order is 

necessary. Accordingly, Google's Motion is DENIED. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chapp 1 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: September 5, 2014
United States of America 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Division of Advertising Practices

August 3, 2020 

Via Electronic Mail (lbrett@bbbnp.org) 

Laura Brett, Esq. 

Vice President 

National Advertising Division 

112 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

Re: Advertising by IV Drips for IV Hydration Therapy 

Dear Ms. Brett: 

The National Advertising Division recently referred to the Federal Trade Commission its 

Decision regarding advertising by IV Drips, Customized IV Hydration & Wellness (“IV Drips”) 

for its IV Hydration Therapy. We understand that as part of its self-monitoring inquiry, NAD 

reached out to the advertiser regarding implied claims about COVID-19. You advised us that 

despite several attempts to reach IV Drips, the advertiser failed to respond. Accordingly, you 

referred this matter to the Federal Trade Commission for our review. 

After we alerted IV Drips to NAD’s referral to the FTC, the company agreed to engage 

with NAD. We understand from recent communications with your staff that IV Drips is now 

actively cooperating with NAD. 

Accordingly, it appears no additional FTC action is warranted at this time. Our decision 

is not to be construed as a determination that a violation has not occurred. The Commission 

reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. The FTC fully 

supports NAD’s self-regulatory process, and we sincerely appreciate your referral and the 

opportunity to continue to assist in supporting NAD. 

Very truly yours, 

Carolyn L. Hann 

Chief of Staff for Advertising Practices 

s/ Carolyn L. Hann
| Area Code/County                | Count |
|---------------------------------|-------|
| 225  Louisiana                  | 7342  |
| 318  Louisiana                  | 10283 |
| 337  Louisiana                  | 6435  |
| 504  Louisiana                  | 12458 |
| 985  Louisiana                  | 4497  |
| Acadia Louisiana                | 399   |
| Allen Louisiana                 | 75    |
| Ascension Louisiana             | 1215  |
| Assumption Louisiana            | 63    |
| Avoyelles Louisiana             | 262   |
| Beauregard Louisiana            | 359   |
| Bienville Louisiana             | 78    |
| Bossier Louisiana               | 1610  |
| Caddo Louisiana                 | 2624  |
| Calcasieu Louisiana             | 1507  |
| Caldwell Louisiana              | 47    |
| Cameron Louisiana               | 14    |
| Catahoula Louisiana             | 40    |
| Claiborne Louisiana             | 64    |
| Concordia Louisiana             | 120   |
| De Soto Louisiana               | 116   |
| East Baton Rouge Louisiana      | 4543  |
| East Carroll Louisiana          | 221   |
| East Feliciana Louisiana        | 427   |
| Evangeline Louisiana            | 77    |
| Franklin Louisiana              | 96    |
| Grant Louisiana                 | 140   |
| Iberia Louisiana                | 356   |
| Iberville Louisiana             | 118   |
| Jackson Louisiana               | 40    |
| Jefferson Davis Louisiana       | 227   |
| Jefferson Louisiana             | 5629  |
| La Salle Louisiana              | 110   |
| Lafayette Louisiana             | 2866  |
| Lafourche Louisiana             | 728   |
| Lincoln Louisiana               | 605   |
| Livingston Louisiana            | 1151  |
| Madison Louisiana               | 72    |
| Morehouse Louisiana             | 207   |
| Natchitoches Louisiana          | 281   |
| No Zip Code Reported, Louisiana | 171   |
| Orleans Louisiana               | 4593  |
| Ouachita Louisiana              | 2094  |
| Plaquemines Louisiana           | 255   |
| Pointe Coupee Louisiana         | 112   |
| Rapides Louisiana               | 936   |
| Red River Louisiana             | 70    |
| Richland Louisiana              | 89    |
| Sabine Louisiana                | 158   |
| St. Bernard Louisiana           | 226   |
| St. Charles Louisiana           | 370   |
| St. Helena Louisiana            | 29    |
| St. James Louisiana             | 56    |
| St. John the Baptist Louisiana  | 285   |
| St. Landry Louisiana            | 444   |
| St. Martin Louisiana            | 431   |
| St. Mary Louisiana              | 238   |
| St. Tammany Louisiana           | 3855  |
| Tangipahoa Louisiana            | 1312  |
| Tensas Louisiana                | 7     |
| Terrebonne Louisiana            | 809   |
| Union Louisiana                 | 355   |
| Vermilion Louisiana             | 459   |
| Vernon Louisiana                | 385   |
| Washington Louisiana            | 327   |
| Webster Louisiana               | 314   |
| West Baton Rouge Louisiana      | 145   |
| West Carroll Louisiana          | 53    |
| West Feliciana Louisiana        | 109   |
| Winn Louisiana                  | 78    |
**EXHIBIT32.02**

 

**Section 1350Certification of Chief Financial OfficerFurnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Versant Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, LEEMCGRATH, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.                    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.                    The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company for the annual period covered by theReport.

 

 
| /s/ Lee McGrath         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Lee McGrath             |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| February 28, 2005  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906has been provided to Versant Corporation and will be retained by VersantCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                  EXHIBIT 11

                            BANKBOSTON CORPORATION

                   Computation of Earnings Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Quarters Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                                                         September 30                September 30
                                                                      ------------------          ------------------
EARNINGS (in millions)                                                  1997       1996             1997       1996
--------                                                             ---------- ----------       ---------- ----------
<S>                                                                  <C>        <C>              <C>        <C> 
1.   Net income                                                        $    226   $     80         $    645   $    449

2.   Less: preferred dividends                                                9          9               27         28
                                                                       --------   --------         --------   --------

3.   Net income applicable to primary and fully diluted
         earnings per common share                                     $    217   $     71         $    618   $    421
                                                                       ========   ========         ========   ========


     SHARES (in thousands)
     ------

4.   Weighted average number of common shares outstanding               145,383    153,103          148,875    153,715
   
5.   Incremental shares from assumed exercise of
         dilutive stock options as of the beginning
         of the period using the treasury stock method                    2,459      2,080            2,699      2,585
                                                                       --------   --------         --------   --------

7.   Adjusted number of common shares                                   147,842    155,183          151,574    156,300
                                                                       ========   ========         ========   ========

     PER SHARE CALCULATION
     ---------------------

8.   Primary net income per common share
         (item 3 divided by Item 4)                                    $   1.49   $    .46         $   4.15   $   2.74

9.   Primary net income per common share
         (item 3 divided by Item 7)                                    $   1.47   $    .45         $   4.07   $   2.69
</TABLE>
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

December 17, 2014

Amanda Wait, Esq.

Hunton & Williams LLP

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

Re: In the Matter of Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc., 

Docket No. C-4423.

Dear Ms. Wait:

This is in reference to the Petition For Approval of Proposed Divestiture filed by Service 

Corporation International (“SCI”) and received on October 23, 2014 (“Petition”). Pursuant to 

the Decision and Order in Docket No. C-4423 (“Order”), SCI requests prior Commission 

approval of its proposal to divest certain funeral home assets to Claney Oatmeyer Semenyuk,

Inc. (“COS).

After consideration of the Petition and other available information, the Commission has 

determined to approve the proposed divestiture as set forth in the Petition. In according its 

approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and the representations 

made by SCI and COS in connection with the Petition and has assumed them to be accurate and 

complete.

This letter also responds to the Petition for Extension of Time (“Petition for Extension”)

filed by SCI on October 27, 2014, pursuant to Commission Rule 4.3(b), 16 C.F.R. § 4.3(b). 

Under the Order, SCI was required to complete the divestitures no later than 180 days after the 

Commission issued the Order, or by October 27, 2014. Rule 4.3(b) provides that “the 

Commission, for good cause shown, may extend any time limit prescribed by the rules in this 

chapter or order of the Commission.” Under applicable precedent, SCI has the burden of 

demonstrating good cause, and granting an extension of time rests in the discretion of the

Commission.
Amanda Wait, Esq.

Page 2

After consideration of SCI’s request, the Commission has determined to grant the 

Petition for Extension and extend the time in which SCI must complete the divestitures required 

by the Order to no later than December 29, 2014. SCI has shown that it began its divestiture 

efforts immediately upon reaching the consent agreement with the Commission staff, that it has 

acted diligently throughout the entire divestiture period and in close communication with the 

Commission staff, and that the delays in completing negotiations were not due to unreasonable 

demands or other unreasonable conduct by SCI. 

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Paul Houston

97 North Street

Brooklin, Ontario

Canada, L1M-0C5
EXHIBIT A 

Case 2:21-cv-00640-RJS Document 2-1 Filed 10/28/21 PageID.21 Page 1 of 2
Placeholder for Digital Video EXHIBIT A, provided as a digital file

Case 2:21-cv-00640-RJS Document 2-1 Filed 10/28/21 PageID.22 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7854 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7854

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the period with 
   respect to which amounts under the Coronavirus Relief Fund may be 
                               expended.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2020

Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania (for himself and Ms. Dean) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the period with 
   respect to which amounts under the Coronavirus Relief Fund may be 
                               expended.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Leveraging Options for Counties And 
Localities Act'' or the ``LOCAL Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION.

    Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) 
is amended by striking ``December 30, 2020'' and inserting ``December 
31, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```