alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 BORDERFREE NUMBER C INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE BORDERFREE, INC. COMMON STOCK SHARES CUSIP 09970L 10 0 SEE
REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS THIS CERTIFIES THATC IS THE REGISTERED HOLDER OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES Borderfree, OF THE COMMON Inc. STO CK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the
holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate, properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER &TRUST COMPANY, LLC (Brooklyn, NY) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR By: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE BORDERFREE, INC. CORPORATE SEAL DELAWARE
* TREASURER PRESIDENT 







 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall
be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

													
		 	TEN COM	 	–	 	as tenants in common	 		  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–	 	                 Custodian                 
		 	TEN ENT	 	–	 	as tenants by the entireties	 		  		 	    (Cust)                        (Minor)
		 	JT TEN	 	–	 	as joint tenants with right	 		  		 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		 		 		 	of survivorship and not as	 		  		 	Act
		 		 		 	tenants in common	 		  		 	            (State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received,
                                         
                                    hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto 
  

			
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	
	
    

    
	 	 

  
  

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE 

 
  
  

 

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                        Shares of
the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                        Attorney to
transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
  

					
	Dated	 	  
	  	

  

							
		 		 		 	  

		 		 	NOTICE:	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.
	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:	 		 		 	
				
	  
	 		 		 	
	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C.
RULE 17Ad-15.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.2

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Prospectus constituting part of this Registration Statement on Form
S-3 of our report dated April 12, 1995 appearing on page F-3 of SA
Holdings, Inc.'s (now known as SA Telecommunications, Inc.) Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1994.


/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Price Waterhouse LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 5, 1996
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),                and, |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June                11, 2007 | /s/                Robert S. Hekemian                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          | Robert                S. Hekemian                                               |
|                                          | Chairman                of the Board and Chief Executive                Officer |
#### Lloyd BOLIN, Appellant, v. ACE DISCOUNT COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 71-238.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 14, 1971.

Ralph P. Ezzo, Miami, for appellant.

Hawkesworth & Kay, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant Bolin seeks review of an adverse final judgment rendered in a jury trial of his action for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. He asserts that the trial court gave a faulty jury instruction; we agree and reverse.

The facts are apparently undisputed. Plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile which collided with another vehicle. At the conclusion of all the evidence in a trial stemming from that collision, the judge charged the jury as to the plaintiff’s contributory negligence. The plaintiff’s counsel indicated that there was no contributory negligence at issue, and defense counsel noted that contributory negligence, which had been raised as a defense in the pleadings, was being withdrawn. The court withdrew the contributory negligence instruction and gave a charge as follows: “The question is, was the plaintiff driving his car without any fault . . . ”

After a careful review of the record presented and the arguments of counsel, we express the view that the trial court erroneously gave a charge to the jury as to contributory negligence, where the question was not an issue in the case. See: Smith v. McCullough Dredging Company, Fla. App.1963, 152 So.2d 194, 196. The additional instruction given in an attempt to cure the error failed to accomplish the purpose intended. Therefore, for the reasons stated, the judgment appealed is reversed.

Reversed.
#### Elza BARKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-397.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1

Exhibit 15. Letter regarding unaudited interim financial information from KPMG


Independent Auditors' Review Report



The Board of Directors and Shareholders
First American Corporation:

We have reviewed the consolidated balance sheets of First American Corporation
and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
income statements, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
three-month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of First American Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated income
statements, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 21, 1999, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In
our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 1998, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/  KPMG LLP
----------------------------------

July 13, 1999
Nashville, Tennessee
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 03-1709

THOMAS ST. YVES,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

JEFFREY MERRILL, WARDEN,

MAINE STATE PRISON,

Respondent, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on October 17, 2003 is

amended as follows:

On page 2, the citation to "Id." following the indented quote

is replaced with the following full citation: "Slack v. McDaniel,

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)."

On page 3, the full citation to Slack is replaced with the

following short citation: "Slack, 529 U.S. at 484."
Exhibit 12.1
                                                                    ------------


STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

This schedule  contains  financial  information  extracted from the Registrant's
Financial  Statements  as of  September  30, 2002 and  December  31, 2001 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       September 30,          December 31,
                                                                                2002                  2001
                                                                       -------------          ------------
<S>                                                                      <C>                      <C>
Current Ratio:

The ratio of current assets divided by current liabilities -

Current assets  (numerator)                                              $ 1,059,895              $510,406
Current liabilities (denominator)                                            820,903               364,909

   Current ratio                                                                 1.3                   1.4

Working Capital:

Current Assets minus Current Liabilities

Current assets                                                           $ 1,059,895              $510,406
Current liabilities                                                          820,903               364,909

   Working Capital                                                           238,992               145,497
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                   1,249,061,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      48,228,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            90,462,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            19,929,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              5,938,836,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   3,560,934,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     3,357,556,000
<LOANS>                                 27,511,472,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                330,679,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          41,229,164,000
<DEPOSITS>                              29,804,048,000
<SHORT-TERM>                             7,653,633,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        380,398,000
<LONG-TERM>                                371,148,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   140,107,000
<OTHER-SE>                               2,879,830,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          41,229,164,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          1,615,154,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          415,196,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            66,213,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         2,096,563,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         771,559,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,031,252,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                    1,065,311,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               75,389,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              41,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            788,019,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            600,081,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 600,081,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               396,327,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.01
<LOANS-NON>                                161,837,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                77,918,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            10,219,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           315,412,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               89,360,000
<RECOVERIES>                                23,704,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          330,679,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       330,679,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    330,679,000


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FIRST
MARYLAND BANCORP MARCH 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,225,841
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,560
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               131,443
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                35,543
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,280,822
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      9,992,341
<ALLOWANCE>                                    161,336
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,406,533
<DEPOSITS>                                  12,425,191
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,687,916
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            621,201
<LONG-TERM>                                    705,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,949
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        85,395
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,829,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              17,406,533
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                196,972
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               62,305
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                10,908
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               270,185
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              99,512
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,680
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          136,505
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    8,871
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              30,432
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                155,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                151,602
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      95,699
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    95,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.89
<LOANS-NON>                                     68,833
<LOANS-PAST>                                    21,347
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 3,668
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 44,186
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               168,186
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   10,434
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,563
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              161,336
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            61,222
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             10,527
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         89,587
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Sentigen Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G.
Scott Segler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

     1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.

Date: March 30, 2006


                                        /s/ G. Scott Segler
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: G. Scott Segler
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO SENTIGEN HOLDING CORP. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY SENTIGEN HOLDING
CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON
REQUEST.
258 La. 362

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Thomas L. GREEN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51318.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Thomas L. Green applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writs refused. The'showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BREANN WATERHOUSE AND 

ROBERT WATERHOUSE, 

 

 Appellants,

v.

FNU GOFIT AND STEPHANIE 

HARRISON,

 Appellees. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00124-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2021DCV1503)

O R D E R

On July 16, 2021, Appellants filed a notice of appeal in the above-styled and numbered 

cause. Upon further review of the trial court’s judgment, this Court has determined that it will treat this 

appeal as being an accelerated appeal from an interlocutory order. Because this appeal is accelerated, the 

notice of appeal was filed late, but still within fifteen days after the deadline for the notice of appeal to 

be filed. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, 

files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by TEX.R.APP.P. 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace 

period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 

S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). However, an appellant must still provide the Court with a reasonable 

explanation for the late filing of the notice of appeal before the Court may accept the 

appeal. Accordingly, Appellant is ordered to respond in writing and provide the Court with a reasonable 

explanation for filing the notice of appeal late. See TEX.R.APP.P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 26.3; Verburgt, 959 

S.W.2d at 617. The explanation is due to be filed no later than August 6, 2021. If Appellants fail to 

comply with this order, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. §1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                January 12, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Vincent L. Kasch    |
|---------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                                  |   | Vincent                L. Kasch        |
|                                  |   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 5

- 6030 8 Summary Calendar

EFFORT ALEXANDER

,

Plaintiff

–

Appell ant,

v ersus

DESOTO COUNTY, MISS ISSIPPI; CITY OF HORN LAKE, MISSISSIPPI,

Defendant s

– Appell ees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi
USDC No. 3 :1 4

- C V

- 135

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing pro se , Effort Alexander challenges the dismissal, as barred

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
October 30, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-60308 Document: 00513253320 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/30/2015No. 1 5

- 6030 8

2 by the Mississippi one

- year statute of limitations, of his action against the

defen dant governmental units for placing an allegedly unjust cloud on his

prop erty. In a short but sufficiently explanatory order, the district court deter

mined that “Alexander has not alleged continual unlawful acts” but only

ongoing injury. It is the acts, however, and not the injury, that triggered the

running of limitations.

AFFIRMED. Case: 15-60308 Document: 00513253320 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/30/2015