alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mrs. Bernice Dykes PUCKETT v. William H. EMMONS et al.

No. 7887.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. First Circuit.

Feb. 2, 1970.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1970.

*673Richard E. Burton, Burton, Roberts & Ward, and Sam J. D’Amico, of D’Amico, Curet & Bush, Baton Rouge, for appellant.

William J. Doran, Baton Rouge, for ap-pellees.

Before LANDRY, SARTAIN and ELLIS, JJ.

ELLIS, Judge.

This is a companion case to Puckett v. Emmons et al., 231 So.2d 671 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1970), decided by us this date, to which reference is made for a recitation of the facts.

Mrs. Puckett, plaintiff herein, sued the owner and operator of the other vehicle involved, and Maryland Casualty Company, her husband’s insurer, under both the liability and uninsured motorist feature of the policy.

She was awarded judgment against Maryland Casualty and Tommy Cockerham, Jr., the uninsured operator of the other vehicle, in solido, for $10,000.00, Maryland’s liability policy limits. She was also given judgment against Cockerham alone for $5,000.00 additional. She has appealed, seeking to collect from Maryland, under the uninsured motorist coverage, the $5,000.00 judgment rendered against Cockerham alone. It is conceded that Maryland has already paid its part of the judgment.

Mrs. Puckett claims that since Cocker-ham is uninsured, and since she has a judgment against him, she should be entitled to collect under the policy. However, Maryland points out the following language in the endorsement, Section 6, Limits of Liability:

> “(b) any amount payable under the terms of this endorsement because of bodily injury sustained in an accident by a person who is an insured under the coverage shall be reduced by

> (1) all sums paid on account of such bodily injury by or on behalf of (i) the owner or operator of the uninsured automobile and (ii) any other person or organization jointly or severally liable together with such owner or operator for such bodily injury including all sums paid under the Bodily Injury Liability Coverage of the policy * * * ”

Since it has already paid $10,000.00 under the bodily injury liability feature of the policy, and the amount claimed by plaintiff under the uninsured motorist endorsement is only $5,000.00, Maryland claims it can have no liability thereunder.

We think this position is well taken. There is no uncertainty or ambiguity in the foregoing clause, and we know of no public *674policy considerations which would render the clause nugatory. Similar exclusions as to medical payments made under other policy provisions have already been upheld. Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 195 So.2d 648 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1967); Connelley v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., 219 So.2d 206 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1969). Mrs. Puckett can have no further recovery against Maryland under the express terms of the policy.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed at plaintiff’s cost.

Affirmed.
#### Arthur L. ARNOLD, as Trustee, et al., Appellants, v. LEE TURZILLO CONTRACTING CO., a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-330.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 28, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
#### INTERIM ACQUISITION CORP., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. William S. REYNER et al., Appellees.

No. 71-39.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 26, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Robert S. Hewitt, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

Ardagh Group S.A., et al. 009356 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) enterinq in 

proceeding the appearance of 

D counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) 

D counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1:81 counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding, 

Peter Love 

pjlove@jonesday.com 

Garrett Liskey 

gmliskey@jonesday.com 

Jones Day 

51 Louisiana Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20001 

Phone Number: 202-879-3939 

Fax Number: 202-626-1700 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 

(Peter Love) 

2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being fi led. 

MillerCoors LLC (third party) 

do Jones Day 

51 Louisiana Avenue 

Washington, DC 20001 

Phone Number 202-879-3939 

Fax Number: 202-626-1700 

5. DATE SIGNED 

12/9/2013 

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580
Odyssey Pictures Corporation
                       1875 Century Park East, Suite 2130
                          Los Angeles, California 90067

                                                                   March 2, 1998

Mr. Ira N. Smith
49 Woodland Drive
Oyster Bay, New York 11771

Dear Mr. Smith:

         Reference is made to your agreement with Odyssey Pictures  Corporation,
f/k/a  Communications  and Entertainment  Corp. (the "Company"),  dated March 6,
1996, as amended by a letter  agreement dated September 23, 1997 (the agreement,
as amended, being hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement").

         Effective  as of the date of this letter  agreement  (the  "Termination
Date"),  you agree that the Agreement shall be cancelled and of no further force
and effect. You further agree to waive any rights to compensation which may have
accrued under the  Agreement  during the period from January 1, 1998 through the
Termination  Date, it being  understood  that all financial  obligations  of the
Company  under the  Agreement  which  accrued  through  December  31, 1997 shall
survive the termination of the Agreement as provided herein.

         In  consideration  of  your  consenting  to  the  cancellation  of  the
Agreement  as of the  Termination  Date,  and waiving  certain  rights which had
accrued under the  Agreement  during the period from January 1, 1998 through the
Termination  Date, the Company hereby agrees to pay to you (or to your assignee,
S.F.H. Associates, Inc., at your election) severance salary payments at the rate
of $5,000 per month  during the four month  period from  January 1, 1998 through
April 30,  1998,  and at the rate of $4,000 per month  during  the  twenty-month
period from May 1, 1998 through  December  31, 1999,  all payments to be made on
the fifteenth  day of each month.  In the event of a default by the Company with
respect to any payment due on or after May 15, 1998, which default continues for
a period of thirty days  thereafter,  then in  addition to any other  rights and
remedies available to you, the severance salary payable hereunder shall increase
to the sum of $8,000 per month  from the date of such  default  and the  payment
term of this agreement  shall be extended for an additional  twelve month period
through December 31, 2000.

         If the  foregoing  accurately  sets  forth  our  understanding,  please
indicate your approval by signing in the space provided below.

                                                 Odyssey Pictures Corporation


                                                 By:/s/ Johan Schotte
                                                 ----------------------
                                                  Johan Schotte, CEO            

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/ Ira N. Smith
-------------------
Ira N. Smith
3/16/98


                                       76
<PAGE>
No. 10840.

#### Welever *v.*Williams et al.

Decided May 12, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Mr. Orville S. Brumback,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Smith & Baker,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, D. Bryan Jordan, certify that: 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Regions Financial Corporation; 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Omitted in accordance with Commission Release No. 33-8238]~~~~
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003

/s/ D. Bryan Jordan
#### UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation, General Surety Underwriters, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Stewart R. Pollock, Petitioners, v. Kenyon C. CRUM and S. Norman Rosedale, d/b/a Crum Construction, Respondents.

No. 40383.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 7, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 600.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
**WINTHROP      REALTY TRUST **

**FORM      10-Q JUNE 30, 2008**

|  | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                            | /s/                Michael L. Ashner   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Name:                          | Michael                L. Ashner       |
|                           | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                           |                                   |
| August                11, 2008 |

----
Christine W eber 626 Route 28 Kingston, NY 12401

Petition for exemption | rulemaking

I have a Virtual Tour business that many Real Estate agents throughout the county call upon for their vi r tual photography as well as indoor photography and Aerial photography. My company’s name is Hudson Valley Tours & More, we service Ulster County and will go out as far as Dutchess, Columbia and Greene Counties. W e are seeking exemption because we would lik e to include Aerial Photography | Videos in our business to inc rease our photography services that we offer . W

e will not fly above 200

- 300 ft depending on the surrounding properties. If there is property in close proximity we will fly the lowest possible t o get the Aerial shots. I do not and will not fly over any government properties as well as reservoirs. I would love to provide this service as part of my Real Estate and Business Virtual Tours.
## SERVED: JULY 31, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTERS OF REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION



### FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0851 AND REGENT AEROSPACE CORPORATION



### FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013-0852
HEARING NOTICE 

### NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered on October 1, 2, and 3, 2014, in Courtroom TBA, U.S. District Court, Northern District ofIllinois, EverettMcKinley Dirksen Building, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 1 

### Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on orbefore 5:00p.m. each day. Settled cases will notbe removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings may beforwarded by fax, express mail, courier or postal service.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

1The parties should confirm the courtroom with Larry Collins, Administrative Assistantto the ChiefJudge, Room· 2530A [312-435-5603; FAX 312-408-5088], prior to or on the day ofhearing. 1



### ....SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Reza Soltanian, 

### Respondent'sPresident RegentAerospace Corporation and Airbase Services, Inc. 28110 West Harrison Parkway Valencia, CA 91355-4109 TEL: 661-257-3000 FAX: 661-702-0241 JohnS. Hoff Jeffrey Clement, 

### Respondent's Counsel HoffLaw Group 135 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 3300 Chicago, IL 60603-4134 TEL: 312-346-8111 FAX: 312-853-3924 Chris G. Zurales, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel, Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7713 FAX: 847-294-7498 TheHonorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 2 FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0851 & FAA-2013-0852 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington,
· DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### James Roland FOSTER, Complainant-Appellant, v. Juanita Hoover FOSTER, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 47459.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 1, 1974.

Sekul, Hornsby, Wallace & Blessey, Biloxi, for complainant-appellant.

Billy F. Brown, Biloxi, for defendant-appellee.

*181PATTERSON, Justice:

This is an appeal by James Roland Foster from a decree of the Chancery Court of the Second Judicial District of Harrison County wherein a general demurrer to the bill of complaint was sustained. The complainant, being aggrieved, argues on appeal that his bill of complaint did state a cause of action and that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer. . . *

The complaint, in the nature of a bill of review, sought to invalidate a divorce decree obtained by Mrs. Juanita Foster, appellant’s wife, on September 30, 1971. The complainant alleged in the bill that the divorce was the result of fraud practiced upon the court and upon the appellant- by Mrs. Foster.

One of the allegations was that the appellant was served with process in the divorce suit at a time when he and his wife were living together and that she informed him that she would take no further steps '-to obtain a divorce nor would there be any divorce until he returned from military duty in Vietnam, whereupon he destroyed the summons.

A further allegation is made that upon his return from overseas service he remained in the home with his wife and family from September 26, 1971, until the divorce on September 30, 1971, without being informed by his wife that the suit had been set for trial. On the basis of these allegations he avers that the divorce was fraudulently obtained since he did not have his day in court.

The trial court’s theory in sustaining the demurrer was that the appellant had been personally served with process in the divorce suit and therefore could not challenge it as being the result of fraud.

In our opinion there are adequate, well-pled allegations of fact, admitted by the demurrer, to state a cause of action in the nature of a bill of review for fraud. Taft v. Taft, 252 Miss. 204, 172 So.2d 403 (1965). We therefore are of the opinion that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer.

Reversed and remanded.

GILLESPIE, C. J., and INZER, SMITH and SUGG, JJ., concur.
258 La. 214

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert Leon SIMS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51264.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 24, 1971.

In re: Robert Leon Sims applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writs refused. Without applying to the District Court, relator is making the same contentions advanced by him in case No. 51,095 of our docket wherein writs were denied on Jan. 27, 1971, 257 La. 555, 242 So.2d 888. We find, therefore, the application without merit.

DIXON, J., recused.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00139-CR

LaJames Bryant

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

130th District Court of Matagorda County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18-006

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 22, 2021
Exhibit 32.0

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

This certification is given by the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cascade
Bancorp (the registrant) pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the registrants
annual report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and                              
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Patricia L. Moss                 
|-------------------------------------
|Patricia L. Moss                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|                                     
|                                     
|/s/ Gregory D. Newton                
|Gregory D. Newton                    
|Executive Vice President and         
|Chief
      Financial Officer        
|                                     
|                                     
|Dated:                               

---
<PAGE>   1



EXHIBIT 12.    STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

                      First Hawaiian, Inc. and Subsidiaries
         Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                QUARTER ENDED                NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                 SEPTEMBER 30,                  SEPTEMBER 30,
                                           -----------------------      ------------------------
                                              1997          1996           1997           1996
                                           ---------     ---------      ---------      --------- 
                                                          (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                        <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>      
Income before income taxes                 $  32,552     $  29,387      $  95,050      $  90,978
                                           ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

Fixed charges:(1)
   Interest expense                           64,850        66,379        191,527        186,686
   Rental expense                              2,502         1,168          7,881          3,544
                                           ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------
                                              67,352        67,547        199,408        190,230
Less interest on deposits                     50,292        48,798        146,105        133,802
                                           ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

   Net fixed charges                          17,060        18,749         53,303         56,428
                                           ---------     ---------      ---------      ---------

   Earnings, excluding
      interest on deposits                 $  49,612     $  48,136      $ 148,353      $ 147,406
                                           =========     =========      =========      =========

   Earnings, including
      interest on deposits                 $  99,904     $  96,934      $ 294,458      $ 281,208
                                           =========     =========      =========      =========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

   Excluding interest on deposits           2.91  X       2.57 x         2.78 X         2.61 x

   Including interest on deposits           1.48  X       1.44 x         1.48 X         1.48 x

</TABLE>


(1)   For the purpose of computing the consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed
      charges, earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges.
      Fixed charges, excluding interest on deposits, include interest (other
      than on deposits), whether expensed or capitalized, and that portion of
      rental expense (generally one third) deemed representative of the interest
      factor. Fixed charges, including interest on deposits, consist of the
      foregoing items plus interest on deposits.

First Hawaiian, Inc. did not have any preferred stock outstanding during the
periods shown above.