alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 776 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 776

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2019

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Medical Services for 
Children Program Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2014, and'' and inserting ``2014,''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
12 19 2014

575655

Aquaforest TIFF Junction Evaluation 

In the Matter of 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ORIGINAL 

ECM BioFilms, Inc., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NO. 9358 

a corporation, also d/b/a 

Enviroplastics International, 

Respondent. 

______________________________ ) 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING INITIAL 

DECISION PURSUANT TO COMMISSION RULE 3.51 

Commission Rule of Practice 3.51(a) provides that "[t]he Administrative Law 

Judge shall file an initial decision within 70 days after the filing of the last filed initial or 

reply proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and order pursuant to § 3.46 .... " 16 

C.F.R. § 3.51(a). The last reply proposed findings and conclusions and briefs were filed 

October 16, 2014. Pursuant to Rule 3.51, therefore, the Initial Decision would be filed on 

or before December 29, 2014. Commission Rule 3.51(a) further provides that "[t]he 

Administrative Law Judge may extend [this time period] by up to 30 days for good 

cause." 16 C.F.R. § 3.51(a). 

The record requiring review and analysis in this matter is voluminous. Over 1, 760 

exhibits were admitted. The parties submitted 3,450 proposed findings of fact (446 by 

Complaint Counsel and 3,004 by Respondents). The parties' proposed findings of fact 

and conclusions oflaw, replies to proposed findings of fact and conclusions oflaw, posttrial briefs, and reply briefs total 1, 782 pages. 

In addition, each side called four expert witnesses. The challenged claims in this 

case involve highly technical scientific expert opinions including in the areas of plastics 

engineering, environmental engineering, microbiology, and biochemistry, as well as 

technical areas involving consumer claim interpretation. The parties also presented 

numerous scientific studies in support of their positions. The complex areas of scientific 

dispute presented require a thorough review ofthe evidence presented by these experts. 
Aquaforest TIFF Junction Evaluation 

Based on the foregoing, good cause exists to extend the deadline for filing the 

Initial Decision in this matter by up to 30 days, to January 28, 2015. 

ORDERED: 

Date: December 19, 2014 

2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Sharon E. Tetlow, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Cell Genesys, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year
period ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Cell Genesys, Inc.

Dated: February 28, 2008



By:

/S/    SHARON E. TETLOWName: Sharon E. Tetlow Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Dennis Barnes McCRANIE et al., Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40743.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 242 So.2d 202.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
1 

Filed 1/15/15 P. v. Washington CA3 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT 

(Sacramento) 

---- 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Plaintiff and Respondent, 

 v. 

WESLEY WASHINGTON, 

 Defendant and Appellant. 

C074733 

(Super. Ct. No. 95F06373) 

 Defendant Wesley Washington appeals from an order denying a petition to recall 

his so-called “three strikes” sentence of 25 years to life, brought pursuant to the 

provisions of the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012 (the Act), codified at Penal Code 

section 1170.126.1 (See Teal v. Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595.) 

 Defendant’s petition to recall his sentence and for resentencing was denied upon 

determination that he was not eligible for relief under the Act because he had been 

 

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 
2 

previously convicted of kidnapping with force and intent to commit sex offenses as listed 

in Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600, subdivision (b) (see §§ 667, 

subd. (e)(2)(C)(iv)(I), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(C)(iv)(I), 1170.126, subd. (e)(3)) and because 

he was armed with a deadly weapon at the time of the commitment offense (see §§ 667, 

subd. (e)(2)(C)(iii), 1170.12, subd. (c)(2)(C)(iii), 1170.126, subd. (e)(2)). 

 Counsel was appointed to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an 

opening brief setting forth the facts of the case and requesting this court to review the 

record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende

(1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Counsel advised defendant of his right to file a supplemental 

brief within 30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, 

and we received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination 

of the entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more 

favorable to defendant.2

DISPOSITION 

 The judgment (order) is affirmed. 

 RAYE , P. J. 

We concur: 

 BLEASE , J. 

 NICHOLSON , J. 

 

2 A record including the appellate record of People v. Washington (Jan. 26, 2000, 

C029961) [nonpub. opn.], which we have incorporated by reference.
**WINTHROP
      REALTY TRUST**


**FORM
      10-Q MARCH 31, 2008**


Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust
      (“the
      Company”) for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas C. Staples,
      Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
      adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




By:
            /s/Thomas
                C. StaplesName:
            Thomas
                C. StaplesChief
                Financial Officer





May
      9,
      2008
##### 



Exhibit 99.1.      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002.



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancWest Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Walter A. Dods,
Jr., Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|     |  |                 |  |    |  |                                                                                     
|---- |  | --------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date |  | August 14, 2002 |  | By |  | /s/  Walter A. Dods, Jr.
Walter A. Dods, Jr.
   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10(ii)

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors
GE Capital Life Assurance Company of New York
     and
Contractholders
GE Capital Life Separate Account II:

We consent to the use of our reports included herein and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Statement of Additional
Information.


/s/  KPMG LLP

Richmond, VA
June 28, 2001
```

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Union Real Estate Equity
and Mortgage Investments (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six month period
ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  August 11, 2004                          /s/  Michael L. Ashner
                                                -------------------------
                                                Michael L. Ashner
                                                Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 11, 2004                          /s/ Thomas Staples
                                                -------------------------
                                                Thomas Staples
                                                Chief Financial Officer
```
#### Reginald C. KENDRY et al., Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 21, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Wm. G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: Mikesic, Anthony [ajm130@psu.edu] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 7:57 AM 

To: EAS (OST) 

Subject: altoona, pa flights 

I am writing just to comment on the current proposals for flights at the Altoona, PA Airport. I have used the current 

commuter flight service by Colgan Air and have been very satisfied. I would like to keep the current service intact. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Anthony Mikesic 

— I 

C3 

i ' \"i
United States of America 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Division of Advertising Practices 

Mary K. Engle ' .• · 

Lewis Rose, Esq. 

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP 

3050 K Street NW, Suite 400 

Washington, DC 20007-5108 

Re: Oracle SP ARC TS Server 

Dear Mr. Rose: 

October 31,2013 

As you know, the staff of the Federal Trade Commission's Division of Advertising 

Practices has conducted an inquiry into certain advertising representations made by your client, 

Oracle Corporation ("Oracle"), for its SP ARC T5 Server. The National Advertising Division of 

the Council of Better Business Bureaus ("NAD") referred this matter to us after a compliance 

proceeding concluded that Oracle failed to modify its advertising as recommended by NAD. 

The challenged advertisement claimed that an Oracle server priced at $299,000 performed 2.6 

times better than an IBM server priced at $805,000: NAD concluded that the benchmark test 

Oracle chose for its ad, comparing one specific Oracle server configuration to one specific IBM 

server configuration, was "wholly insufficient" to substantiate broad server comparisons. 

Upon review of this matter, we have determined not to take additional action at this time. 

In arriving at this conclusion, we considered a number of factors related to resource allocation 

and enforcement priorities, including the nature of the product (expensive enterprise servers, 

typically highly customized for each client) and the complex sales and purchasing process for the 

product, as well as the nature of any FTC Act violation and the type and severity of any 

consumer injury. The Commission reserves the right to take such further action as the public 

interest may require. 

Very truly yours, 

/14--'4l(, + Mary~~~~ Engle 1..J Assoc~;{)trector 

cc: Andrea C. Levine, Esq. 

National Advertising Division
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - 44 CFR Part 67
          - [Docket ID FEMA-2018-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1085]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; withdrawal.

      ( print page 27746)    

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed rule concerning proposed flood elevation determinations for Assumption Parish, Louisiana and Incorporated Areas.

# DATES:

The proposed rule is withdrawn as of June 14, 2018.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1085, to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov;*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On February 5, 2010, FEMA published a proposed rule at 75 FR 5915, proposing flood elevation determinations along one or more flooding sources in Assumption Parish, Louisiana and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed rule.

Authority:42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

David I. Maurstad,

Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation (Acting), Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2018-12641 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 18, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00366

- CR

April OROSCO

, Appellan t

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Ju dicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR5505

Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On October 18, 2019, appellant’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw as

counsel and a n amended brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he

asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal.

After reviewing counsel’s motion to withdraw and brief , we conclude counsel has not

fully complied with Kelly v. State because there is no indication counsel has i nformed his client

of her pro se right to seek discretionary review should this court declare appellant’s appeal

frivolous. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant’s counsel file a res ponse indicating he has

complied with the above Kelly requirements by December 2, 2019.

__________________ _______________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of November, 2019

.

_________________ __________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

Subsidiaries

 

**THQ Inc.**

 
| Blue Tongue Entertainment Pty. Ltd.        | Australia        |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------|
| Juice Games Limited                        | United Kingdom   |
| Locomotive Games, Inc.                     | California       |
| Minick USA Inc. (75% owned)                | Delaware         |
| MINICK Holding AG (50% owned)              | Switzerland      |
| Rainbow Multimedia Group, Inc.             | Arizona          |
| THQAC, Inc.                                | Texas            |
| THQ/JAKKS Pacific, LLC                     | Delaware         |
| THQ Asia Pacific Pty. Ltd.                 | Australia        |
| THQ Canada Inc.                            | British Columbia |
| dba Relic Entertainment                    |             |
| THQ Entertainment GmbH                     | Germany          |
| THQ France S.a r.l.                        | France           |
| T.HQ (Holdings) Limited                    | United Kingdom   |
| THQ Interactive Entertainment Espana, S.L. | Spain            |
| THQ International GmbH                     | Switzerland      |
| THQ International Operations Limited       | United Kingdom   |
| THQ Japan K.K.                             | Japan            |
| THQ Korea Ltd.                             | Korea            |
| THQ Nordic ApS                             | Denmark          |
| THQ  Studio Australia Pty. Ltd.            | Australia        |
| THQ (UK) Limited                           | United Kingdom   |
| THQ Wireless Inc.                          | Delaware         |
| THQ Wireless International S.a r.l.        | Luxembourg       |
| THQ Wireless Singapore Pte. Ltd.           | Singapore        |
| Vigil Games, LLC                           | Texas            |
| Volition, Inc.                             | Delaware         |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, William Craig, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vital Signs, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)      designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c)      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.        The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

 

----