alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 777 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Debbie Smith Reauthorization 

Act of 2019’’. 

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 

2000 (34 U.S.C. 40701) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)— 

(A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘including’’ and 

inserting ‘‘prioritizing, to the extent practicable consistent 

with public safety considerations’’; and 

(B) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘including’’ and 

inserting ‘‘in particular,’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

(B) in paragraph (7), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(8) provide assurances that the DNA section of the laboratory to be used to conduct DNA analyses has a written policy 

that prioritizes the analysis of, to the extent practicable consistent with public safety considerations, samples from homicides and sexual assaults.’’; 

(3) in subsection (c)(3)— 

(A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘2014 through 

2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2019 through 2024’’; and 

(B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘2014 through 

2019’’ and inserting ‘‘2019 through 2024’’; and 

(4) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘2015 through 2019’’ and 

inserting ‘‘2019 through 2024’’. 

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION. 

Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 

(34 U.S.C. 40722(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘2015 through 2019’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2019 through 2024’’. 
H. R. 777—2 

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS. 

Section 304(d) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 

(34 U.S.C. 40723(d)) is amended by striking ‘‘2015 through 2019’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2019 through 2024’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7875 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7875

  To require States and units of local governments to enforce stay-at-
              home orders equally, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 30, 2020

 Mr. Kevin Hern of Oklahoma (for himself, Mr. Banks, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. 
    Gibbs, Mr. Griffith, Mr. Flores, Mr. Budd, Mr. David P. Roe of 
  Tennessee, Mr. Baird, Mr. Norman, Mr. Guest, Mr. Cline, Mr. Hice of 
   Georgia, Mr. Allen, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Babin, Mr. 
Duncan, Mr. Steube, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Meuser, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Timmons, 
 and Mr. Green of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require States and units of local governments to enforce stay-at-
              home orders equally, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Opportunity First Amendment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EQUAL ENFORCEMENT OF STAY-AT-HOME ORDERS.

    In the case that a State or unit of local government issues an 
order that limits gatherings to a certain number of people pursuant to 
a national emergency declared by the President under the National 
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) or a similar State emergency 
declaration, the State or unit of local government may not discriminate 
in the enforcement of such order, in the case of persons who are 
exercising a right protected under the First Amendment.

SEC. 3. PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.

    A person who is harmed by a violation of section 2 may bring an 
action in the appropriate district court of the United States seeking 
relief.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                   1,350,476,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      77,255,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            58,192,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            23,982,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              5,512,854,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   3,327,552,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     3,241,547,000
<LOANS>                                 26,552,685,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                326,982,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          39,807,622,000
<DEPOSITS>                              28,427,211,000
<SHORT-TERM>                             7,436,790,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        410,652,000
<LONG-TERM>                                388,377,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   140,012,000
<OTHER-SE>                               3,004,580,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          39,807,622,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          1,073,711,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          270,094,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            41,813,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         1,385,618,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         512,712,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         659,714,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      725,904,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               44,682,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              38,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            522,799,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            423,329,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 423,329,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               278,520,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.21
<LOANS-NON>                                159,103,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                99,575,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             5,849,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           315,412,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               54,463,000
<RECOVERIES>                                15,817,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          326,982,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       326,982,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    326,982,000


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,935,677
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,125,133
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,182,713
<EQUITIES>                                     392,365
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,512,366
<CASH>                                          77,523
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             367,844
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          58,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,379,141
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,733,055
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            343,936
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,813
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,113,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,379,141
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,130,633
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            192,636
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              18,668
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 (1,198)
<BENEFITS>                                     841,511
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    (3,687)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           306,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                196,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                    41,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            154,860
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   154,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.74
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               1,985,786
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            849,235
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (7,724)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             172,875
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               447,154
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              2,383,528
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          7,724


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7601 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7601

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2020

   Ms. Shalala (for herself and Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Concerns Over Nations Funding 
University Campus Institutes in the United States Act'' or the 
``CONFUCIUS Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Confucius Institute'' 
means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the 
Government of the People's Republic of China.
    (b) Restrictions on Confucius Institutes.--An institution of higher 
education or other postsecondary educational institution (referred to 
in this section as an ``institution'') shall not be eligible to receive 
Federal funds from the Department of Education (except funds under 
title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) 
or other Department of Education funds that are provided directly to 
students) unless the institution ensures that any contract or agreement 
between the institution and a Confucius Institute includes clear 
provisions that--
            (1) protect academic freedom at the institution;
            (2) prohibit the application of any foreign law on any 
        campus of the institution; and
            (3) grant full managerial authority of the Confucius 
        Institute to the institution, including full control over what 
        is being taught, the activities carried out, the research 
        grants that are made, and who is employed at the Confucius 
        Institute.
                                 <all>
```
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7810 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3519 East Walnut Street in Pearland, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Tom Reid Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 7810 EH

1 SECTION 1. TILDEN VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3519 East Walnut Street in 

4 Pearland, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Tom Reid Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tom Reid Post Office 

10 Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 

2020. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7810 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBuilding’’. Pearland, Texas, as the ‘‘Tom Reid Post Office al Service located at 3519 East Walnut Street in
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2005, (the Report) of
First West Virginia Bancorp, Inc., the (Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exchange Act of 1934; and



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Sylvan J. Dlesk                                             
|                      |  | Sylvan J. Dlesk                                                 
|                      |  | Chairman, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer/Director
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                   
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Francie P. Reppy                                            
|                      |  | Francie P. Reppy                                                
|                      |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer            
|                      |  | (Chief Financial Officer)                                       



36
#### Jon MARDEN et al., Petitioners, v. Alma MARDEN, Respondent.

No. 43913.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 13, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 15, 2021

NO. 03-19-00784-CR

James Allen Brickley, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgments. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3499

___________ Janice Smith, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Robbins Hardwood Flooring, Inc., also * known as Robbins Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 30, 1999

Filed: August 13, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Janice Smith appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment on Smith's race andsex-based employment discrimination claims. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we see no error by the district court. Assuming for the purpose of our review that Smith established the elements of a prima facie case, we conclude there is no substantial evidence in the record tending to show that Robbins HardwoodFlooring's decision to discharge Smith for insubordinate conduct was a pretext for race and sex discrimination. We also conclude that an extended discussion-2-

is unnecessary in this fact intensive case. We thus affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Versant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jochen Witte, asChief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for thequarterly period covered by the Report.
| /s/ Jochen Witte                      |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Jochen Witte                          |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| January 29, 2007                 |   |   |

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.**

----
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-392]
 ACTION: Notice of application.
 DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic classes, and applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before August 13, 2018.
 ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DRW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been delegated to the Assistant Administrator of the DEA Diversion Control Division (“Assistant Administrator”) pursuant to section 7 of 28 CFR part 0, appendix to subpart R. In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33(a), this is notice that on May 3rd, 2018, Alcami Wisconsin Corporation, W130 N10497 Washington Dr., Germantown, WI 53022 applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Controlled
                             substance
Drug code
ScheduleThebaine
9333
IIAlfentanil
9737
II
 The company plans to provide bulk active pharmaceutical ingredient to support clinical trials. Dated: June 6, 2018. John J. Martin, Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-12684 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
THE CHANGING CONSUMER 


DEMOGRAPHICS: 


An FTC Workshop - December 6, 2016 

 

MARKETING TO DIFFERENT
 

CONSUMER POPULATIONS
 

Research Presentation 

Yannis Spiliopoulos, Columbia University 

Vincent Toubiana, Commission Nationale de 

l'Informatique et des Libertés 
 

MARKETING TO DIFFERENT
 

CONSUMER POPULATIONS
 

Orlena Blanchard, Joy Collective 

Xenia Boone, Direct Marketing Association 

Edward Chang, Asian American Advertising 

Federation 

Horacio Gavilán, The Voice of Hispanic 

Marketing 
 

 

THE DEMOGRAPHICS OF 

CONSUMER COMPLAINTS & FRAUD
 

Devesh Ravel,
 

Bureau of Economics, FTC
 
Lunch
 1 pm to 2 pm
#### Mary Elia GRANT, Appellant, v. Charles MARCUS, Jr., Appellee.

No. 72-512.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### VANGUARD FLEXIBLE PACKAGING CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. Harold VINEBERG, Appellee.

No. 73-1496.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 13, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Walter DANIELS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39820.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 13, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 235 So.2d 740.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.