UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

POINTBREAK MEDIA, LLC; et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

DEFAULT FINAL ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MONETARY 

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS AARON MICHAEL JONES; VINCENT YATES;

POINTBREAK MEDIA, LLC; DCP MARKETING, LLC; MODERN SOURCE MEDIA, 

LLC; NATIONAL BUSINESS LISTINGS, LLC; AND ALLSTAR DATA, LLC

Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), filed its First 

Amended Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Other Equitable Relief [ECF No. 109] (“First 

Amended Complaint”) under section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 

U.S.C. section 53(b), and section 6 of the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse 

Prevention Act (“Telemarketing Act”), 15 U.S.C. section 6105. On April 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed 

a Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants Aaron Michael Jones (“Jones”); Vincent Yates 

(“Yates”); Pointbreak Media, LLC (“Pointbreak Media”); Modern Source Media, LLC (“Modern 

Source”); DCP Marketing, LLC (“DCP Marketing”); National Business Listings, LLC (“National 

Business Listings”); and Allstar Data, LLC (“Allstar”) [ECF No. 264]. 

Having carefully considered the Motion, the record, and applicable law, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion [ECF No. 264] requesting a 

permanent injunction against the Defaulting Defendants is hereby GRANTED as follows:

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 1 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

2

FINDINGS

A. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties under 28 U.S.C.

sections 1331, 1337(a), and 1345; and 15 U.S.C. sections 45(a) and 53(b).

B. Venue is proper as to all parties in this District under 28 U.S.C. sections 1391(b)(2), 

(b)(3), and (d); and 15 U.S.C. section 53(b).

C. The First Amended Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted 

under section 13 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. section 53; and section 6 of the Telemarketing Act, 15 

U.S.C. section 6105.

D. The Defaulting Defendants’ activities as alleged in the First Amended Complaint 

are in or affecting commerce, as defined in section 4 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. section 44. 

E. The FTC properly served each of the Defaulting Defendants with the Complaint or 

First Amended Complaint. (See [ECF No. 24]) (DCP Marketing, LLC)); (see [ECF No. 28]

(Modern Source Media, LLC)); (see [ECF No. 29] (Pointbreak Media, LLC)); (see [ECF No. 41]

(Aaron Michael Jones)); (see [ECF No. 133] (National Business Listings, LLC)); 

(see [ECF No. 134] (Vincent Yates)); and (see [ECF No. 137] (Allstar Data, LLC)).

F. The Defaulting Defendants failed to answer or otherwise respond to the FTC’s 

Complaint or First Amended Complaint.

G. On June 28, 2018, the Clerk of Court entered defaults against Pointbreak Media, 

LLC; DCP Marketing, LLC; Modern Source Media, LLC; and Aaron Michael Jones. 

(See [ECF Nos. 101-104]).

H. On August 15, 2018, the Clerk of Court entered defaults against Allstar Data, LLC; 

National Business Listings, LLC; and Vincent Yates. (See [ECF Nos. 156-158]).

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 2 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

3

I. The FTC is entitled to default judgment as to the Defaulting Defendants under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 55(b). 

J. The allegations in the First Amended Complaint are taken as true against Defaulting 

Defendants. Those allegations establish that Defendants Pointbreak Media, LLC; DCP Marketing, 

LLC; Modern Spotlight LLC; Modern Spotlight Group LLC; Modern Source Media, LLC; Perfect 

Image Online LLC; National Business Listings, LLC; Allstar Data, LLC; and Modern Internet 

Marketing LLC (collectively, “Pointbreak Defendants”) formed a common enterprise. See FTC 

v. Lanier Law, LLC, 715 F. App’x 970, 979 (11th Cir. 2017).

K. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that the Pointbreak 

Defendants violated section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. section 45, by deceptively marketing and 

selling to small business owners Google “claiming and verification” and search engine 

optimization services.

L. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that Defaulting 

Defendants Jones and Yates participated in, had authority to control, and had knowledge of the 

Pointbreak Defendants’ deceptive marketing and sale of Google “claiming and verification” and 

search engine optimization services.

M. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that Defendant 

Pointbreak Media, LLC engaged in unfair practices, in violation of section 5 the FTC Act, 15 

U.S.C. section 45, by writing itself unauthorized $100 checks from at least 280 of its customers’ 

bank accounts. 

N. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that Defaulting 

Defendant Jones had authority to control Pointbreak Media, LLC’s unauthorized billing.

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 3 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

4

O. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that the Pointbreak 

Defendants were engaged in telemarketing, as defined by the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”), 

16 C.F.R. sections 310.2(aa), (cc), and (dd).

P. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that the Pointbreak 

Defendants violated the TSR, 16 C.F.R. section 310.4(b)(1)(v), by initiating or causing the 

initiation of telemarketing calls that delivered prerecorded messages. 

Q. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that the Pointbreak 

Defendants violated the TSR, 16 C.F.R. section 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B), by initiating or causing the 

initiation of telemarketing calls to consumers whose telephone numbers were on the National Do 

Not Call Registry (“DNC Registry”).

R. The allegations of the First Amended Complaint establish that Defaulting 

Defendants Jones and Yates had authority to control or participated in the Pointbreak Defendants’ 

unlawful telemarketing.

S. In light of Defaulting Defendants Jones and Yates’s conduct, and Jones’s violation

of a prior court order, there is a cognizable danger that they will continue to engage in activities in 

violation of the FTC Act and the TSR unless permanently enjoined from such acts and practices. 

T. Equitable monetary relief is warranted against Defaulting Defendants. 

U. Consumers paid the Pointbreak Defendants at least $3,367,666.30.

V. Each of the Defaulting Corporate Defendants is jointly and severally liable for 

equitable monetary relief in the amount of $3,367,666.30.

W. Defaulting Defendant Jones is jointly and severally liable for equitable monetary 

relief in the amount of $2,351,670.81.

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 4 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

5

X. Defaulting Defendant Yates is jointly and severally liable for equitable monetary 

relief in the amount of $1,917,073.83.

DEFINITIONS

For purposes of this Order, the following definitions apply:

A. “Clear and Conspicuous” means that a required disclosure is difficult to miss and 

easily understandable by ordinary consumers, including in all the following ways:

1. In any communication that is solely visual or solely audible, the disclosure 

must be made through the same means through which the communication is 

presented. In any communication made through both visual and audible means, 

such as a television advertisement, the disclosure must be presented simultaneously 

in both the visual and audible portions of the communication even if the 

representation requiring the disclosure is made in only one means.

2. A visual disclosure, by its size, contrast, location, the length of time it 

appears, and other characteristics, must stand out from any accompanying text or 

other visual elements so that it is easily noticed, read, and understood.

3. An audible disclosure, including by telephone or streaming video, must be 

delivered in a volume, speed, and cadence sufficient for ordinary consumers to 

easily hear and understand it.

4. In any communication using an interactive electronic medium, such as the 

Internet or software, the disclosure must be unavoidable. 

5. The disclosure must use diction and syntax understandable to ordinary 

consumers and must appear in each language in which the representation that 

requires the disclosure appears.

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 5 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

6

6. The disclosure must comply with these requirements in each medium 

through which it is received, including all electronic devices and face-to-face 

communications.

7. The disclosure must not be contradicted or mitigated by, or inconsistent 

with, anything else in the communication.

8. When the representation or sales practice targets a specific audience, such 

as children, the elderly, or the terminally ill, “ordinary consumers” includes 

reasonable members of that group.

B. “Corporate Defendants” means Pointbreak Media, LLC; DCP Marketing, LLC; 

Modern Spotlight LLC; Modern Spotlight Group LLC; Modern Internet Marketing LLC; Modern 

Source Media, LLC; Perfect Image Online LLC; Allstar Data, LLC; National Business Listings, 

LLC; and Pinnacle Presence LLC, and their successors and assigns, individually, collectively, or 

in any combination.

C. “Defaulting Corporate Defendants” means Pointbreak Media, LLC; Modern 

Source Media, LLC; DCP Marketing, LLC; National Business Listings, LLC; and Allstar Data 

LLC, and their successors and assigns, individually, collectively, or in any combination. 

D. “Defaulting Defendants” means Defaulting Corporate Defendants and Defaulting 

Individual Defendants, individually, collectively, or in any combination. 

E. “Defaulting Individual Defendants” means Aaron Michael Jones and Vincent 

Yates, individually, collectively, or in any combination. 

F. “Defendants” means all the Individual Defendants and the Corporate Defendants, 

individually, collectively, or in any combination.

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 6 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

7

G. “Individual Defendants” means Dustin Pillonato; Justin Ramsey; Aaron Michael 

Jones, a/k/a Michael Aaron Jones and Mike Jones; Ricardo Diaz; Michael Pocker; Steffan Molina; 

Vincent Yates; and Daniel Carver, individually, collectively, or in any combination.

H. “National Do Not Call Registry” means the “do-not-call” registry of telephone 

numbers maintained by the Commission pursuant to 16 C.F.R. section 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(B).

I. “Outbound Telephone Call” means a telephone call initiated by a Telemarketer 

to induce the purchase of goods or services or to solicit a charitable contribution.

J. “Pointbreak Defendants” means Pointbreak Media, LLC; DCP Marketing, LLC; 

Modern Spotlight LLC; Modern Spotlight Group LLC; Modern Internet Marketing LLC; Modern 

Source Media, LLC; Perfect Image Online LLC; Allstar Data, LLC; and National Business 

Listings, LLC, and their successors and assigns, individually, collectively, or in any combination.

K. “Receiver” means Jonathan E. Perlman, Esq., whom the Court appointed as

Receiver in Section XI of the Preliminary Injunction as to Defendants Dustin Pillonato; Justin 

Ramsey; Aaron Michael Jones; Michael Pocker; Pointbreak Media, LLC; DCP Marketing, LLC; 

Modern Spotlight LLC; Modern Spotlight Group LLC; Modern Internet Marketing LLC; and 

Modern Source Media, LLC (see [ECF No. 64]); in Section XI of the Preliminary Injunction as to 

Defendants Steffan Molina and Perfect Image Online LLC [ECF No. 58]; and in Section XI of the 

Preliminary Injunction as to Defendants Allstar Data, LLC; National Business Listings, LLC; 

Pinnacle Presence LLC; Vincent Yates; and Daniel Carver [ECF No. 169].

L. “Remotely Created Payment Order” means any check, draft, remotely-created 

check, payment instruction, or payment order, whether in written or electronic format, that is 

drawn on a payor’s account, initiated or created by or on behalf of the payee, and deposited into 

or cleared through the check clearing system. For purposes of this definition, an account includes 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 7 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

8

any financial account or credit or other arrangement that allows checks, payment instructions, or 

orders to be drawn against it that are payable by, through, or at a bank.

M. “Search Engine Optimization Service or Product” means any service, product, 

plan, or program represented, expressly or by implication, to improve a consumer’s rankings or 

visibility in search engine results or increase the quantity or quality of traffic directed to a consumer

through search engine results.

N. “Telemarketer” means any person who, in connection with Telemarketing, 

initiates or receives telephone calls to or from a customer or donor.

O. “Telemarketing” means any plan, program, or campaign which is conducted to 

induce the purchase of goods, services, or charitable contributions, by use of one or more 

telephones, and which involves a telephone call, whether or not covered by the TSR. 

ORDER

I. PERMANENT BAN ON TELEMARKETING

Defaulting Defendant Jones, whether acting directly or through an intermediary, is

permanently restrained and enjoined from:

A. Participating in Telemarketing, including by consulting, brokering, planning, or advising; 

and

B. Owning or controlling, holding a managerial post in, consulting for, serving as an officer 

in, having any revenue sharing agreement with, or holding any ownership interest, share, 

or stock in, other than the stock of a publicly traded company, any company that 

participates in Telemarketing, including by consulting, brokering, planning, or advising.

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 8 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

9

II. PERMANENT BAN ON USING REMOTELY CREATED PAYMENT ORDERS

TO DEBIT CONSUMER ACCOUNTS

Defaulting Defendant Jones and the Corporate Defaulting Defendants are permanently 

restrained and enjoined, whether acting directly or through an intermediary, from debiting or 

attempting to debit any consumer’s bank or financial account using a Remotely Created Payment 

Order. 

III. PERMANENT BAN ON SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION 

SERVICES OR PRODUCTS

Defaulting Defendant Jones and the Corporate Defaulting Defendants are permanently

restrained and enjoined, whether acting directly or through an intermediary, from advertising, 

marketing, promoting, offering for sale, or selling any Search Engine Optimization Service or 

Product.

IV. PERMANENT BAN ON ROBOCALLS

Defaulting Defendant Yates and Defaulting Corporate Defendants, whether acting directly 

or through an intermediary, are permanently restrained and enjoined from:

A. Initiating, causing the initiation of, or assisting others in initiating any Outbound Telephone 

Call that delivers a prerecorded message; and

B. Owning or controlling, holding a managerial post in, consulting for, serving as an officer 

in, having any revenue sharing agreement with, or holding any ownership interest, share or 

stock in, other than the stock of a publicly traded company, any company that engages in 

conduct banned in Subsection IV.A.

V. PERMANENT BAN ON CALLING TELEPHONE NUMBERS LISTED ON THE 

NATIONAL DO NOT CALL REGISTRY

Defaulting Defendant Yates and Defaulting Corporate Defendants, whether acting directly 

or through an intermediary, are permanently restrained and enjoined from:

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 9 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

10

A. Initiating, causing the initiation of, or assisting others in initiating any Outbound 

Telephone Call to any telephone number listed for more than 31 days on the National Do Not Call 

Registry; and

B. Owning or controlling, holding a managerial post in, consulting for, serving as an 

officer in, having any revenue sharing agreement with, or holding any ownership interest, share or 

stock in, other than the stock of a publicly traded company, any company that engages in conduct 

banned in Subsection V.A.

VI. REQUIRED TELEMARKETING DISCLOSURES

Defaulting Defendant Yates and Defaulting Corporate Defendants, Defaulting Defendant 

Yates and Defaulting Corporate Defendants’ officers, agents, employees, and attorneys, and all 

other persons in active concert or participation with any of them, who receive actual notice of this 

Order are permanently restrained and enjoined from initiating, causing others to initiate, or 

assisting others in initiating any Outbound Telephone Call that fails to disclose truthfully, 

promptly, and in a Clear and Conspicuous manner (1) the identity of the seller, (2) that the purpose 

of the call is to sell goods and services, and (3) the nature of those goods or services. 

VII. PROHIBITION AGAINST MISREPRESENTATIONS

Defaulting Defendants; their officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and all 

other persons in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, who receive actual notice 

of this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, in connection with promoting or offering for 

sale any good or service are permanently restrained and enjoined from misrepresenting or assisting 

others in misrepresenting, expressly or by implication:

A. that they are authorized by, or affiliated with, Google or any other individual or entity;

B. that any consumer is in danger of being removed from any internet search results or marked 

closed by Google or any other individual or entity;

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 10 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

11

C. any material aspect of any refund, cancellation, exchange or repurchase policy, including 

the likelihood of a consumer obtaining a full or partial refund, or the circumstances in 

which a full or partial refund will be granted to the consumer; or

D. any other fact material to consumers concerning any good or service, such as: the total

costs; any material restrictions, limitations, or conditions; or any material aspect of its 

performance, efficacy, nature, or central characteristics.

VIII. MONETARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFAULTING DEFENDANT JONES

A. Judgment in the amount of $2,351,670.81 is entered in favor of the Commission 

and against Defaulting Defendant Jones, jointly and severally, as equitable monetary relief. 

Defaulting Defendant Jones is ordered to pay the Commission this amount immediately 

upon entry of this Order.

B. Any entity or person, including Defaulting Defendant Jones or any financial 

institution, holding Defaulting Defendant Jones’s assets must transfer those assets to the 

Commission or Receiver, in accordance with instructions provided by a representative of 

the Commission, within seven days of receiving notice of this Order. 

C. Defaulting Defendant Jones shall take all steps necessary to assist in the transfer of

his assets. If it is necessary to execute additional documents to transfer, liquidate, or assign 

Defaulting Defendant Jones’s assets or any other assets surrendered under this Order, 

Defaulting Defendant Jones shall execute such documents within three days of a request 

from a representative of the Commission. 

D. The freeze against the assets of Defaulting Defendant Jones under the May 8, 2018 

Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 12], the May 21, 2018 Order Extending the 

Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 23], and the June 7, 2018 Preliminary Injunction 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 11 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

12

[ECF No. 64] is modified only as to Jones. Specifically, once all of Jones’s frozen assets 

are transferred consistent with Subsections A-C, the asset freeze will dissolve as to Jones. 

E. Jones’ Taxpayer Identification Numbers (such as his Social Security Numbers), 

which Jones must submit to the Commission, may be used for collecting and reporting on 

any delinquent amount arising out of this Order, consistent with 31 U.S.C. section 7701. 

F. All money paid to the Commission under this Order may be deposited into a fund 

administered by the Commission or its designee to be used for equitable relief, including 

consumer redress and any attendant expenses for the administration of any redress fund. If 

a representative of the Commission decides that direct redress to consumers is wholly or 

partially impracticable or money remains after redress is completed, the Commission may 

apply any remaining money for such other equitable relief (including consumer 

information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to Defendants’ practices 

alleged in the First Amended Complaint. Any money not used for such equitable relief is 

to be deposited to the United States Treasury as disgorgement. Defaulting Defendant Jones

has no right to challenge any actions the Commission or its representatives may take under

this Subsection.

IX. MONETARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFAULTING DEFENDANT YATES

A. Judgment in the amount of $1,917,073.87 is entered in favor of the Commission 

and against Defaulting Defendant Yates, jointly and severally, as equitable monetary relief. 

B. Any entity or person, including Defaulting Defendant Yates or any financial 

institution, holding Defaulting Defendant Yates’s assets must transfer those assets to the 

Commission or Receiver, in accordance with instructions provided by a representative of 

the Commission, within seven days of receiving notice of this Order. 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 12 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

13

C. Defaulting Defendant Yates shall take all steps necessary to assist in the transfer of 

his assets. If it is necessary to execute additional documents to transfer, liquidate, or assign 

Defaulting Defendant Yates’s assets or any other assets surrendered under this Order, 

Defaulting Defendant Yates shall execute such documents within three days of a request 

from a representative of the Commission. 

D. The freeze against the assets of Defaulting Defendant Yates pursuant to the August 

30, 2018 Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 169] is modified only with respect to Yates. 

Specifically, upon Yates satisfying the judgment under Subsection A, the asset freeze will 

dissolve with respect to Yates. 

E. Yates’s Taxpayer Identification Numbers (such as his Social Security Numbers), 

which Yates must submit to the Commission, may be used for collecting and reporting on 

any delinquent amount arising out of this Order, consistent with 31 U.S.C. section 7701. 

F. All money paid to the Commission under this Order may be deposited into a fund 

administered by the Commission or its designee to be used for equitable relief, including 

consumer redress and any attendant expenses for the administration of any redress fund. If 

a representative of the Commission decides that direct redress to consumers is wholly or 

partially impracticable or money remains after redress is completed, the Commission may 

apply any remaining money for such other equitable relief (including consumer 

information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to Defendants’ practices 

alleged in the First Amended Complaint. Any money not used for such equitable relief is 

to be deposited to the United States Treasury as disgorgement. Yates has no right to 

challenge any actions the Commission or its representatives may take pursuant to this 

Subsection.

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 13 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

14

X. MONETARY JUDGMENT AS TO DEFAULTING CORPORATE DEFENDANTS

A. Judgment in the amount of $3,367,666.30 is entered in favor of the Commission 

and against Defaulting Corporate Defendants, jointly and severally, as equitable monetary 

relief.

B. Any entity or person, including Defaulting Corporate Defendants or any financial 

institution, holding Defaulting Corporate Defendants’ assets must transfer those assets to 

the Commission or Receiver, consistent with instructions provided by a representative of 

the Commission, within seven days of receiving notice of this Order. 

C. Defaulting Corporate Defendants shall take all steps necessary to assist in the 

transfer of their assets. If it is necessary to execute additional documents to transfer, 

liquidate, or assign Defaulting Corporate Defendants’ assets or any other assets 

surrendered under this Order, Defaulting Corporate Defendants shall execute such 

documents within three days of a request from a representative of the Commission. 

D. The freeze against the assets of Defaulting Corporate Defendants pursuant to the 

May 8, 2018 Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 12], the May 21, 2018 Order 

Extending the Temporary Restraining Order [ECF No. 23], the June 7, 2018 Preliminary 

Injunction [ECF No. 64], and the August 30, 2018 Preliminary Injunction [ECF No. 169] 

is modified only with respect to Defaulting Corporate Defendants. Specifically, upon 

Defaulting Corporate Defendants satisfying the judgment under Subsection A, the asset 

freeze will dissolve with respect to Defaulting Corporate Defendants. 

E. Defaulting Corporate Defendants’ Taxpayer Identification Numbers, which 

Defaulting Defendants Pointbreak Media, LLC; DCP Marketing, LLC; Modern Source 

Media, LLC; and Allstar Data, LLC previously submitted to the Commission, and which 

Defaulting Defendant National Business Listings, LLC must submit to the Commission,

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 14 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

15

may be used for collecting and reporting on any delinquent amount arising out of this 

Order, consistent with 31 U.S.C. section 7701. 

F. All money paid to the Commission pursuant to this Order may be deposited into a 

fund administered by the Commission or its designee to be used for equitable relief, 

including consumer redress and any attendant expenses for the administration of any 

redress fund. If a representative of the Commission decides that direct redress to 

consumers is wholly or partially impracticable or money remains after redress is 

completed, the Commission may apply any remaining money for such other equitable relief 

(including consumer information remedies) as it determines to be reasonably related to 

Defendants’ practices alleged in the First Amended Complaint. Any money not used for 

such equitable relief is to be deposited to the United States Treasury as disgorgement. 

Defaulting Corporate Defendants have no right to challenge any actions the Commission 

or its representatives may take pursuant to this Subsection.

XI. CUSTOMER INFORMATION

Defaulting Defendants; their officers, agents, employees, and attorneys; and all other 

persons in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, who receive actual notice of 

this Order, whether acting directly or indirectly, are permanently restrained and enjoined from 

directly or indirectly: 

A. failing to provide sufficient customer information to enable the Commission to 

efficiently administer consumer redress. If a representative of the Commission requests in 

writing any information related to redress, Defaulting Defendants must provide it, in the 

form prescribed by the Commission, within 14 days. 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 15 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

16

B. disclosing, using, or benefitting from customer information, including the name, 

address, telephone number, email address, social security number, other identifying 

information, or any data that enables access to a customer’s account (including a credit 

card, bank account, or other financial account), that any Defendant obtained or used prior

to the entry of this Order in connection with the marketing and sale of Google “claiming 

and verification” and search engine optimization services.

C. failing to destroy such customer information in all forms in their possession, 

custody, or control within 30 days after receipt of written direction to do so from a 

representative of the Commission.

Provided, however, that customer information need not be disposed of, and may be 

disclosed, to the extent requested by a government agency or required by law, regulation, or court 

order.

XII. ORDER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Defaulting Defendants must each obtain acknowledgments of receipt of this Order as 

follows:

A. Each Defaulting Defendant, within seven days of entry of this Order, must submit 

to the Commission an acknowledgment of receipt of this Order sworn under penalty of 

perjury.

B. For 10 years after entry of this Order, each Defaulting Individual Defendant, for 

any business that such Defendant, individually or collectively with any other Defendants, 

is the majority owner or controls directly or indirectly, and each Defaulting Corporate 

Defendant, must deliver a copy of this Order to: (1) all principals, officers, directors, and 

LLC managers and members; (2) all employees having managerial responsibilities for 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 16 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

17

conduct related to the subject matter of the Order and all agents and representatives who

participate in conduct related to the subject matter of the Order; and (3) any business entity 

resulting from any change in structure as set forth in the Section titled Compliance 

Reporting. Delivery must occur within seven days of entry of this Order for current 

personnel. For all others, delivery must occur before they assume their responsibilities.

C. From each individual or entity to which Defaulting Defendants delivered a copy of 

this Order, that Defendant must obtain, within 30 days, a signed and dated acknowledgment 

of receipt of this Order.

XIII. COMPLIANCE REPORTING

Defaulting Defendants each make timely submissions to the Commission:

A. One year after entry of this Order, each Defaulting Defendant each must submit a 

compliance report, sworn under penalty of perjury:

1. Each Defaulting Defendant must: (a) identify the primary physical, postal, 

and email address and telephone number, as designated points of contact, which 

representatives of the Commission may use to communicate with Defendant; (b) 

identify all of that Defendant’s businesses by all of their names, telephone numbers, 

and physical, postal, email, and Internet addresses; (c) describe the activities of 

each business, including the goods and services offered, the means of advertising, 

marketing, and sales, and the involvement of any other Defendant (which 

Defaulting Individual Defendants must describe if they know or should know due 

to their own involvement); (d) describe in detail whether and how that Defendant 

is in compliance with each Section of this Order; and (e) provide a copy of each 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 17 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

18

Order Acknowledgment obtained under this Order, unless previously submitted to 

the Commission.

2. Additionally, each Defaulting Individual Defendant must: (a) identify all 

telephone numbers and all physical, postal, email and Internet addresses, including 

all residences; (b) identify all business activities, including any business for which 

such Defendant performs services whether as an employee or otherwise and any 

entity in which such Defendant has any ownership interest; and (c) describe in detail 

such Defendant’s involvement in each such business, including title, role, 

responsibilities, participation, authority, control, and any ownership.

B. For 20 years after entry of this Order, each Defaulting Defendant each must submit 

a compliance notice, sworn under penalty of perjury, within 14 days of any change in the 

following: 

1. Each Defaulting Defendant must report any change in: (a) any designated 

point of contact; or (b) the structure of any Corporate Defendant or any entity that 

Defendant has any ownership interest in or controls directly or indirectly that may 

affect compliance obligations arising under this Order, including: creation, merger, 

sale, or dissolution of the entity or any subsidiary, parent, or affiliate that engages 

in any acts or practices subject to this Order.

2. Each Defaulting Individual Defendant must also report any change in: (a) 

name, including aliases or fictitious name, or residence address; or (b) title or role 

in any business activity, including any business for which such Defendant performs 

services whether as an employee or otherwise and any entity in which such 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 18 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

19

Defendant has any ownership interest, and identify the name, physical address, and 

any Internet address of the business or entity.

C. Each Defaulting Defendant must submit to the Commission notice of the filing of 

any bankruptcy petition, insolvency proceeding, or similar proceeding by or against him

within 14 days of its filing.

D. Any submission to the Commission required by this Order to be sworn under 

penalty of perjury must be true and accurate and comply with 28 U.S.C. section1746, such 

as by concluding: “I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States 

of America that the foregoing is true and correct,” and supplying the date, signatory’s full 

name, title (if applicable), and signature.

E. Unless otherwise directed by a Commission representative in writing, all 

submissions to the Commission pursuant to this Order must be emailed to DEbrief@ftc.gov 

or sent by overnight courier (not the United States Postal Service) to: Associate Director 

for Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission, 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580. The subject line must begin: FTC v. 

Pointbreak Media, X180031.

XIV. RECORDKEEPING

Defaulting Defendants must create certain records for 20 years after entry of the Order and 

retain each such record for five years. Specifically, each Defaulting Corporate Defendant and each 

Defaulting Individual Defendant for any businesses that such Defaulting Individual Defendant, 

individually or collectively with any other Defendants, is a majority owner or controls directly or 

indirectly, must create and retain the following records:

A. Accounting records showing the revenues from all goods or services sold;

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 19 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

20

B. Personnel records showing, for each person providing services, whether as an 

employee or otherwise, that person’s: name; addresses; telephone numbers; job title or 

position; dates of service; and (if applicable) the reason for termination;

C. Records of all consumer complaints and refund requests, whether received directly 

or indirectly, such as through a third party, and any response;

D. All records necessary to demonstrate full compliance with each provision of this 

Order, including all submissions to the Commission; and

E. A copy of each unique advertisement or other marketing material, including sales 

scripts.

XV. COMPLIANCE MONITORING

For the purpose of monitoring Defaulting Defendants’ compliance with this Order, 

including any failure to transfer any assets as required by this Order:

A. Within 14 days of receipt of a written request from a representative of the 

Commission, each Defaulting Defendant must: submit additional compliance reports or 

other requested information, which must be sworn under penalty of perjury; appear for 

depositions; and produce documents for inspection and copying. The Commission is also 

authorized to obtain discovery, without further leave of court, using any of the procedures 

prescribed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 29, 30 (including telephonic depositions), 

31, 33, 34, 36, 45, and 69. Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 26.1(i), the 

Commission is not required to provide notice to Defaulting Defendants of, or make 

available for inspection by Defaulting Defendants, any objections, documents, 

electronically stored information, or things received in response to a subpoena. 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 20 of 21
 CASE NO. 18-61017-CIV-ALTONAGA/Seltzer

21 

B. For matters concerning this Order, the Commission is authorized to communicate 

directly with Defaulting Defendants. Defaulting Defendants must permit representatives 

of the Commission to interview any employee or other person affiliated with any Defendant

who has agreed to such an interview. The person interviewed may have counsel present. 

C. The Commission may use all other lawful means, including posing, through its 

representatives, as consumers, suppliers, or other individuals or entities, to Defaulting 

Defendants or any individual or entity affiliated with any of them, without the necessity of 

identification or prior notice. Nothing in this Order limits the Commission’s lawful use of 

compulsory process, under 15 U.S.C. sections 49, 57b-1. 

D. Upon written request from a representative of the Commission, any consumer 

reporting agency must furnish consumer reports concerning Defaulting Individual 

Defendants, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. section 1681b(a)(1). 

XVI. RETENTION OF JURISDICTION

The Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of construction, modification, and 

enforcement of this Order. 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 25th day of April, 2019. 

 

____________________________________ 

CECILIA M. ALTONAGA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

cc: counsel of record 

Justin Ramsey (pro se) 

 Dustin Pillonato (pro se) 

Case 0:18-cv-61017-CMA Document 265 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2019 Page 21 of 21