alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OF REGISTRANT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF REGISTRANT FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,262,000
<SECURITIES>                                19,077,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,304,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   336,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,115,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,637,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,443,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,457,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,125,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,991,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,457,000
<SALES>                                     29,031,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,696,000
<CGS>                                       21,391,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,420,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               290,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                276,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,513,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,609,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                 693,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,302,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .90


</TABLE>
#### James BECKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-681.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 14, 1970.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal quashed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Federal Trade Commission

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Statement of the Federal Trade Commission 

Concerning Cigarette and Smokeless Tobacco 6(b) Orders 

FTC File No. P114508 

February 25, 2019 

The Federal Trade Commission’s Cigarette Report and Smokeless Tobacco Report have tracked

the sales and marketing of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products for more than two 

generations. As has been true in recent decades, this year’s reports show a trend of decreasing 

sales and marketing expenditures, which is good news for our national health. 

The FTC lacks similar data about the rapidly growing market for e-cigarettes, and as a result the

FTC’s and the public’s understanding of the overall market for nicotine-based products is 

substantially incomplete. The Commission will endeavor to close this gap in our understanding 

by collecting data on e-cigarette sales and marketing and sharing that information with the public 

in a similar report.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41609 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WILLIAM JOHN CHAPPELL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-41-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * William John Chappell appeals his conditional guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Chappell argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized from his garage. Although Chappell concedes that he had no expectation of privacy since his garage door was open, he contends that the seizure of evidence therefrom, which was in plain view, was improper since officers were not authorized to enter the garage without aNo. 03-41609 -2- warrant. Chappell argues that, to the extent state law authorized the officers’ entry into his garage, the applicable provisions of the Texas Transportation Code (TTC) violate the Fourth Amendment. Regardless of Chappell’s challenge to the TTC, the exigent circumstances created by Chappell by leaving his garage door open and a firearm in plain view justified the officers’ entry into his garage. See United States v. Jones , 239 F.3d 716, 719-22 (5th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying Chappell’s motion to suppress. See United States v. Alvarez , 6 F.3d 287, 289 (5th Cir. 1993). Chappell also renews his challenge to the presentence report’s six-level increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(1)(C), arguing that one of the 25 firearms recovered from his residence belonged to his father-in-law. When overruling Chappell’s objection to the U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(1)(C) enhancement, the district court rejected as incredible Chappell’s argument that he lacked knowledge of the firearm. A credibility determination on a factual finding at sentencing is peculiarly within the province of the trier-of-fact. See United States v. Sotelo , 97 F.3d 782, 799 (5th Cir. 1996). For the first time in a F ED . R. A PP . P. 28(j) letter, Chappell contends that, pursuant to Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), his offense level increases under U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1(b)(1)(C) and 2K2.1(b)(4) were improper since the factsNo. 03-41609 -3- supporting these enhancements were not submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Chappell acknowledges that this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 473 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 03-30437), and he raises the issue solely to preserve it for future review.
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
26 CFR Part 1

[TD 8701]
RIN 1545-AC06


Treatment of Shareholders of Certain Passive Foreign Investment 
Companies; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Correction to final regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to final regulations (TD 
8701) which were published in the Federal Register on Friday, December 
27, 1996 (61 FR 68149). The final regulations provide rules for making 
a deemed sale or deemed dividend election to purge a shareholder's 
holding period of stock of a PFIC of those taxable years during which 
the PFIC was not a QEF.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gayle Novig (202) 622-3880 (not a 
toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The final regulations that are subject to this correction is under 
section 1291 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final regulations (TD 8701) contains an error 
that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of final and temporary regulations (TD 
8701) which is the subject of FR Doc. 96-32246 is corrected as follows:


Sec. 1.1291-9  [Corrected]

    On page 68152, column 3, Sec. 1.1291-9, paragraph (d)(2)(i), line 
9, the language ``taxable year of inclusion of each'' is corrected to 
read ``taxable year or years of inclusion of each''.
Michael L. Slaughter,
Acting Chief, Regulations Unit, Assistant Chief Counsel (Corporate).
[FR Doc. 97-3950 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
#### Willie Mae Baumgarner COX and Thomas H. Cox, Appellants, v. Audrey ROGERS, by next friend, A. W. Rogers and David Dewey Walsh, Appellees.

No. 70-522.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Opinion issued August 3, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00356-CV

———————————

ACUITY MARKETING, INC., TOM WALTER HAYNES,

AND SHAWN HAYNES, Appellants

V.

ELIZABETH ANNE WHITSELL, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. CV-0078158

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. No opinion has 

issued in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Lloyd.
ORIGlNAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

In the Matter of 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 9327 

) 

MODIFICATION OF ORDER GRATING 

JOINT MOTION TO REVISE THE SCHEDULING ORDER 

By Order dated April 8, 2009, the paries' joint motion to modify the Scheduling Order to 

obtain an extension of time for the filing of in camera motions for designated non-pary witness 

deposition transcripts was granted. The April 8, 2009 Order stated: 

The parties have provided a reasonable basis for allowing non-parties to defer 

filing motions for in camera treatment for designated non-party witness 

transcripts until after the parties have determined whether to call such individuals 

to testify at trial or to offer such transcripts into evidence. The parties shall 

provide 10 days advance notice to non-parties prior to seeking to introduce such 

non-party's designated deposition testimony into evidence. 

That provision of the April 8, 2009 Order is hereby modified with following additional 

directives: Non-paries shall then have five days from the date the notice is received to file 

motions for in camera treatment for such designated deposition testimony. Any oppositions to 

such motions shall be filed within three business days. In the event that any non-party does not 

have sufficient time to file a motion for in camera treatment prior to the offering of evidence into 

trial, provisional in camera treatment may be granted pursuant to 16 C.F .R. § 3.45(g). Within 

twenty days of such a provisional grant of in camera status, the party offering the evidence or an 

interested non-pary must present a motion to the Administrative Law Judge for a final ruling on 

whether in camera treatment ofthe material is appropriate pursuant to § 3.45(b). Ifno such 

motion is filed, the Administrative Law Judge may either exclude the evidence, deny in camera 

status, or take such other action as is appropriate. 16 C.F.R. § 3.45(g). 

ORDERED: JVV ~
 

D. Michael Chapp 11
 

Administrative Law Judge 

Dated: April 
 14, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the joint meeting of the National Cancer Advisory Board and NCI Board of Scientific Advisors, June 26, 2018, 8:30 a.m. to June 27, 2018, 12:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Conference Room TE 406/408, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 05, 2018, 83 FR 26069.                

                    This meeting notice is being amended to update the meeting locations for the National Cancer Advisory Board                     *Ad Hoc*                     Subcommittee meetings. The National Cancer Advisory Board                     *Ad Hoc*                     Subcommittee Population Science, Epidemiology and Disparities meeting on June 25, 2018, 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m., will be held at the Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center in Salons A and B. The National Cancer Advisory Board                     *Ad Hoc*                     Subcommittee on Global Cancer Research meeting on June 25, 2018, 7:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., will be held at the Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center in Salon C.                

Dated: June 11, 2018.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-12837 Filed 6-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 780 

To provide reimbursement to certain Federal employees for childcare expenses 

during the lapse in appropriations beginning on or about December 

22, 2018. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Ms. OMAR (for herself, Ms. NORTON, Ms. MOORE, Ms. PRESSLEY, Ms. 

OCASIO-CORTEZ, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. CLARKE of New York, 

Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. 

NADLER, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. BEYER, Mr. COX of California, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. POCAN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. LEVIN of Michigan, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. HILL

of California, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. SOTO, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. COHEN, 

Mr. NEGUSE, Mr. MEEKS, Mrs. LAWRENCE, and Mr. CARSON of Indiana) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To provide reimbursement to certain Federal employees for 

childcare expenses during the lapse in appropriations 

beginning on or about December 22, 2018. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Worker 

5 Childcare Protection Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 780 IH

1 SEC. 2. CHILDCARE REIMBURSEMENT. 

2 Any Federal employee who is furloughed or working 

3 without receiving a paycheck during the lapse in appro4 priations beginning on or about December 22, 2018, and 

5 paying for childcare during such lapse shall receive reim6 bursement for such care— 

7 (1) subject to appropriations; and 

8 (2) if such an employee can provide documenta9 tion to the General Services Administration in the 

10 form a of a receipt from a childcare provider. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1**Certification**I, Gregg L. Engles, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Dean Holding Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Dean Holding Company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to Dean Holding Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Dean Holding Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in Dean Holding Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Dean Holding Company’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, DeanHolding Company’s internal control over financial reporting.5. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dean Holding Company’sauditors and the audit committee of Dean Holding Company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectDean Holding Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in Dean Holding Company’s internal control over financialreporting.                                                              /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES   Gregg L. Engles   *Chief Executive Officer*   August 14, 2006
No. 99-1996.

#### J. E. M. Ag Supply, Inc., dba Farm Advantage, Inc., et al. *v.*Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
^
                                  Diamond Hill
                                  ------------
                                  Investments


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
                                             Investor Contact:
                                             James F. Laird
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             614-255-3353
                                             E-mail: (jlaird@diamond-hill.com)

                  DIAMOND HILL ANNOUNCES PRIVATE PLACEMENT

     Columbus,  Ohio -- July 22, 2004, -- Diamond Hill Investment Group,
Inc. (NASDAQ:DHIL) today announced the sale of 60,000 shares of the company's
common stock at a price of $7.00 per share to three key individuals.
Ric Dillon, President of Diamond Hill stated, "Geroge McElroy, Pete Williams,
and Gary Young are exceptional people who recently agreed to join the Diamond
Hill team. I am very pleased that these individuals, who have significant
industry experience and expertise, are committing their efforts and capital
to our firm."  Dillon went on to say "we have built an outstanding investment
team and an excellent track record for all of our portfolios.  We expect to
continue to add new clients and grow assets under management, ultimately
leading to profitability once scale is achieved."


About Diamond Hill:

     Diamond Hill provides investment management services to individuals and
institutions seeking to preserve and build wealth.  The firm currently manages
more than $325 million in mutual funds, seperate accounts and a private
investment fund.  For more information on Diamond Hill, visit
http://www.diamond-hill.com.



                                     ###

            375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio 43215
                         614-255-3333  fax 614-255-3363
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12716]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Notice of Availability of Software and Documentation for 
Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Availability of Mi-Std-1553B decoder software and documentation 
for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 801 of Public Law 113-66 
(2014 National Defense Authorization Act) as extended by Section 818 of 
Public Law 114-328; the Department of the Air Force announces the 
availability of Mil-Std-1553B decoder software and related 
documentation for decoding the interaction of bus controllers (BC) and 
remote terminals (RT) using field programmable gate array (FPGA) 
implementation technology.

ADDRESSES: Licensing interests should be sent to: Air Force Research 
Laboratory, Sensors Directorate, AFRL/RYO, 2241 Avionics, Wright-
Patterson AFB, OH 45433; Facsimile: (937) 656-4676.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Air Force Research Laboratory, Sensors 
Directorate, AFRL/RYO, 2241 Avionics, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433; 
Facsimile: (937) 656-4676.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mil-Std-1553B decoder is written in the 
VHDL programming language and is vendor agnostic. This software is 
useful for implementation in technologies that need to passively 
collect, monitor or process existing Mil-Std-1553B bus interactions in 
real-time.

Henry Williams,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-12716 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
#### Albert Michael KNOWLES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-719.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 14, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Brill v. State, 1947, 159 Fla. 682, 32 So.2d 607 and McNeely v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 520.