alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In *re*Jimmie Floyd MILLER v. STATE. Ex parte Jimmie Floyd Miller.

SC 702.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 14, 1974.

Robert W. Gwin, Jr., Birmingham, for petitioner.

No brief for the State.

FAULKNER, Justice.

Petition of Jimmie Floyd Miller for Cer-tiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Miller v. State, 52 Ala.App. 143, 290 So.2d 207.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, HAR-WOOD and MADDOX, JJ., concur.
258 La. 212

#### Arthur R. ADAMS, Sr. v. Nina Baudier ADAMS, Wife of Arthur R. Adams, Sr.

No. 51245.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 24, 1971.

In re: Arthur R. Adams, Sr. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 243 So.2d 318.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.

DIXON, J., is of the opinion that the judgment is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1118-1119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.


[[Page 1119]]


TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Monday, January 13, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal 
Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced 
meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204. You may call (202) 452-3207, beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before this meeting, for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting.

    Dated: January 3, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-458 Filed 1-6-97; 9:49 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### George E. THOMAS, Individually, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mary O. NELSON and Travelers Insurance Company, Defendant-Relator.

No. 9435.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 11, 1973.

France W. Watts, III, Franklinton, for defendant-relator.

John W. Anthony, Bogalusa, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before LANDRY, SARTAIN and TUCKER, JJ.

SARTAIN, Judge.

We granted a writ in this cause to review the ruling of the trial judge who overruled a motion for summary judgment filed by Travelers Insurance Company (Relator). The question involved is one of coverage under the uninsured motorist provisions of a policy of liability insurance issued by relator to George E. Thomas.

The facts which are alleged in the petition and supported by the offerings made in the motion for summary judgment are not in dispute.

Respondent brought suit individually and as the administrator of his minor sons, Roger Lynn and Jeff Thomas. These youths were injured when they were involved in a collision between a vehicle owned and operated by Mary O. Nelson, who was uninsured at the time, and a motorcycle, owned by Mr. Thomas and driven at the time by Roger Lynn Thomas, who was accompanied by his brother Jeff.

The basis for the motion for summary judgment is that the motorcycle owned by Mr. Thomas was not listed as an insured vehicle on the policy issued to him by relator. Accordingly, relator contends that there is no coverage based upon the exclusionary provisions of Part III (a) of the policy which reads as follows:

> “This policy does not apply under Part m:

> (a) to bodily injury to an insured while occupying a highway vehicle (other than an insured automobile) owned by the named insured or a relative, or through being struck by such a vehicle

Relator relies upon the case of Rushing v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.App., 216 So.2d 875 (1968) in which this court held that the owner and his guest passenger, who were traveling in a second vehicle belonging to the owner which was not listed on the liability policy issued to the owner by Allstate, could not avail themselves of *291the provisions of the uninsured motorist provision of the owner’s policy. The import of the exclusionary provision in the Rushing case is almost identical to that in the case at bar.

In opposition to the writ, respondent relies upon and cites the case of Elledge v. Warren, 263 So.2d 912 (1972), wherein the Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit of this state held that similar exclusionary provisions did not preclude the plaintiff from proceeding against her own insurance company when her minor son was injured in a vehicle-motorcycle accident, under circumstances similar to those in the instant case.

We have carefully reviewed our reasons for judgment in *Rushing*and those assigned in *Elledge*and are of the opinion that we would like to reconsider the interpretation placed on the pertinent exclusionary provision and the position taken by us in *Rushing.*

For these reasons, the writ heretofore issued is recalled and vacated and plaintiff’s and relator’s remedy shall be by appeal after a trial on the merits.

Writ recalled.
---

EXHIBIT 99.3

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ferdi Dippenaar, Chief Executive Officer of Great Basin Gold
Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Ferdi Dippenaar    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Ferdi Dippenaar        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 27, 2009         

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 8671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4660]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[WA50-7123b; FRL-5692-9]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: 
Washington

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving in 
part, and disapproving in part, and taking no action in part on the 
Regulations of the Southwest Air Pollution Control Authority (SWAPCA) 
for the control of air pollution in Clark, Cowlitz, Lewis, Skamania and 
Wahkiakum Counties, Washington, as revisions to the Washington State 
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions pertain to General 
Regulations for Air Pollution Sources administered by SWAPCA. In the 
final rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the 
State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment 
and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the 
approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments 
are received in response to this proposed rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this rule. If the EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period 
on this action.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
March 28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Montel Livingston, 
Environmental Protection Specialist (OAQ-107), Office of Air Quality, 
at the EPA Regional Office listed below. Copies of the documents 
relevant to this proposed rule are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours at the following locations. The interested 
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment 
with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the visiting day.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air Quality, 
1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101.
    Washington State Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 47600, PV-11, 
Olympia, WA, 98504-7600.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Elson, Office of Air Quality 
(OAQ-107), EPA, 1200 6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101, (206) 553-1463.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action which is located in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: February 14, 1997.
Charles Findley,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-4660 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### S & M SUPER MARKET, Petitioner, v. Jerry REWIS et al., Respondents.

No. 40922.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 5424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01731]

[[Page 5424]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday February 8, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Stacy D. Yochum,
Counsel to the Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-01731 Filed 1-23-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
#### Jerry Wayne BLOW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 20, 1973.

W. H. F. Wiltshire, of Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark & Stone, Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on ap*139peal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Klever Marketing, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul G. Begum, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/S/ Paul G. BegumPaul G. BegumChairman and CEOMarch 31, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nick S. KARNO.

No. 60375.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Harry Connick, applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ denied. The showing doesn’t warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
#### Rickey *v.*Baughman, Administrator.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18321

Decided March 18, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Athens county.

*Mr. Randall R. Lively,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Faster & Wells*and *Mr. Emmett Keenan,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC 

### ************************************ Federal Aviation Administration 

## * Complainant 

### v. 

## * * * 

# RECEIVED FEB 27

# 2013 Ht:ARING DOCKET
* FAADocketNo. CPllGLOOOO 

### D & M Custom Injection Molding Corporation Respondent 

## * 

## * *· 

## * 

## * ************************************* Judge Richard C. Goodwin DMS No. FAA-2011-0679

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AND STRIKE RESPONSE BRIEF TO INITIAL DECISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAWJUDGE RICHARD c_ GOODWIN
The Complainant moves to strike the Respondent's unauthorized appeal brief from the record and asks that an Order be entered dismissing the untimely appeal filed by the Respondent, based upon the following: 1. OnDecember 13,2012, the Honorable Judge issued a written decision on the August 9, 2012 hearing, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.232(c) ofthe Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions. 2. On January 30, 2012, the Respondent filed a document titled Response Briefto Initial Decision ofAdministrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. 3. The Respondent did not file a Notice ofAppeal. 4. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(a), a Notice ofAppeal must be filed in the FAA Hearing Docket within 10 days after the service ofthe written initial decision.2 5. The Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions do not allowthe filing ofa Response Briefto Initial Decision. WHEREFORE, Complainant requests that ifthe Administrative Law Judge considers the filing ofthe Response Briefas an Appeal thatthe Appeal be dismissed on the grounds that a Notice was never filed with the Hearing Docket. Inthe alternative, Complainant requests that the Response Briefbe stricken as it is not an authorized pleading inthe Federal Rules ofPractice inFAA Civil Penalty Actions.

Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey A. Klang Regional Counsel

Kate Barber Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, Illinois 60018CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifY that the foregoing Motion has been faxed and mailed to the following:
The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-50 Room 5411 U.S. Department ofTransportation 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590 FAX: (202) 366-7536 And by CERTIFIED MAlL to: Mr. Scott Hagen Vice President D&M Custom Injection Molding Corporation 150 French Road P.O. Box 158 Burlington, IL 60109 Hearing Docket FAA, AGC-400 600 Independence Ave., SW Room 2014 Washington, DC 20590 FAX: (202) 493-5020 TEL: (202) 385-8229

Offic f t e Regional C 

# J/Jilt2 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,234,848
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,290,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                       210,345
<INVENTORY>                                      4,885,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,157,585
<PP&E>                                          72,182,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,962,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,656,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,393,164
<BONDS>                                         20,750,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,012,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,656,152
<SALES>                                          4,965,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,587,746
<CGS>                                            4,530,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,612,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 824,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (379,978)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       110,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (258,063)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (258,063)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.38)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

United States City Average

                    Pursuant to Section 112 of the 1976 amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act, 52 U.S.C. 30116(c), the Secretary of Labor has certified to the Chairman of the Federal Election Commission and publishes this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     that the United States City Average All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (1967=100) increased 397.1 percent from its 1974 annual average of 147.7 to its 2017 annual average of 734.269 and that it increased 38.4 percent from its 2001 annual average of 530.4 to its 2017 annual average of 734.269. Using 1974 as a base (1974=100), I certify that the United States City Average All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers thus increased 397.1 percent from its 1974 annual average of 100 to its 2017 annual average of 497.135. Using 2001 as a base (2001=100), I certify that the United States City Average All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers increased 38.4 percent from its 2001 annual average of 100 to its 2017 annual average of 138.437. Using 2006 as a base (2006=100), I certify that the CPI increased 21.6 percent from its 2006                           ( print page 27027)                        annual average of 100 to its 2017 annual average of 121.588.                

Signed at Washington, DC, on May 30, 2018.

R. Alexander Acosta,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2018-12484 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
#### In re Houston SNIDER, Jr. v. STATE. Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

SC 657.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 14, 1974.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and David Lee Weathers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, petitioner.

No brief for respondent.

HARWOOD, Justice.

Petition of the State by its Attorney General for Certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Snider v. State, 52 Ala.App. 139, 290 So.2d 202.

Writ denied.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, MADDOX and FAULKNER, JJ., concur.
#### Ronald Wallace SANJURJO, a/k/a Ronald Vicent Sanjurjo, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-239.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.