alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12389]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9978-85--Region 10]

Extension of Comment Period for Proposed Issuance of NPDES 
General Permit for Hydroelectric Facilities Within the State of Idaho 
(IDG360000)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed issuance of NPDES General Permit; extension 
of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 is 
extending the comment period for the proposed issuance of a National 
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for 
Hydroelectric Facilities discharging to waters within the State of 
Idaho (Permit No. IDG360000). The agency is extending the comment 
period for 30 days in response to requests from Idaho Power Co. and 
Utility Water Act Group.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed General Permit published in 
the Federal Register on April 27, 2018 (83 FR 18555) is being extended. 
Comments must be received on or before July 11, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments on the draft General Permit to 
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, USEPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth 
Avenue, Suite 155, OWW-191, Seattle, WA 98101. Your comments may also 
be submitted by fax to (206) 553-1280 or electronically to 
[email protected].
    Comments on the draft 401Certification should be sent to Loren 
Moore, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, 1410 N Hilton, Boise, 
Idaho 83706 or electronically to [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dru Keenan, 206-553-1219, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 27, 2018 (83 FR 18555), the EPA 
Region 10 published the proposed general NPDES permit for hydroelectric 
facilities located in Idaho in the Federal Register. The original 
deadline to submit comments was June 11, 2018. This action extends the 
comment period for 30 days. Written comments must now be received on or 
before July 11, 2018.
    Permit documents may be found on the EPA Region 10 website at: 
https://www.epa.gov/npdes-permits/draft-npdes-general-permit-hydroelectric-generating-facilities-idaho. Copies of the draft General 
Permit and Fact Sheet are also available upon request. Requests may be 
made to Audrey Washington at (206) 553-0523 or to Dru Keenan at (206) 
553-1219. Requests may also be electronically mailed to: 
[email protected], or [email protected].

    Dated: May 22, 2018.
Daniel D. Opalski,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2018-12389 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statements of Operations and Balance Sheets and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           2,476
<SECURITIES>                                    12,741
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                       392
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,084
<PP&E>                                           3,756
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,867
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,311)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,709
<SALES>                                         12,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,776
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,287
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (44)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    803
<INCOME-TAX>                                        88
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                715
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, Ferdi Dippenaar, Chief Executive Officer of Great Basin Gold
Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    | /s/ Ferdi Dippenaar    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | Ferdi Dippenaar        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | February 20, 2009      

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Helicopter Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John G. Murphy, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: August 19, 2008
                                      /S/ JOHN G. MURPHY
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    John G. Murphy
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 SEPTEMBER 6, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-10384 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 4:10-cr-00155-BAE-GRS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

CHRISTOPHER J. COOPER, 

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll l Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Georgia

 ________________________

(September 6, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert N. Nye, III, appointed counsel for Christopher J. Cooper in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cooper’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED. 

2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Vital Signs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Terry D. Wall, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: December 12, 2006  |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   |
| /s/ Terry D. Wall         |   |
| Terry D. Wall             |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |
#### EVANS v. GRAY.

No. 38086.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 40.
Q 

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

^ ^ 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

VIA TELECOPIER 

September 30, 2009 

William Elder, Esq. 

Hogan & Hartson 

Columbia Square 

555 Thirteenth St., N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

(fax no. 202-637-5910) 

J. Ernest Baird, Esq. 

Daryl M. Williams, Esq. 

Baird, Williams & Greer, LLP 

6225 N. 24* Street, Suite 125 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

(fax no. 602-271-9308) 

52 '-d 

— I 

C3 

-1 -^ J 

Re: Valley Aviation Services v. City of Glendale, 

FAA Docket No. 16-09-06 

Dear Mr. Elder and Mr. Williams: 

The Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") received the Valley Aviation Services' request for 

a 30-day extension of time in which to file a response to the complaint. Based on coimsel's 

representation that there is no opposition to this request, the FAA hereby grants the request for 

an extension until October 30,2009. 

If you have any questions, please contact me. 

Th^Hkyou for your attention,to this matter. 

JhdElizabethlr. Head, E/q. 

Airports Law Branen, AGC-610 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W., 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Elizabeth.Head@faa.gov 

(202)267-3211(0) 
Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-610) 

Airport Compliance Division 

Office of Airport Compliance and Field Operations 

ACO-lOO
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50585 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARK ANTHONY EVANS, also known as Mark Evans, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-96-CR-2-1

- - - - - - - - - - March 18, 1998 Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mark Anthony Evans was convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine. He challenges his conviction and sentence on several grounds. Evans first argues that the district court erred in increasing his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a) for his role in the offense. We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and find that the district court did not clearly err inNo. 97-50585 -2- assessing a four-level increase in Evans’ offense level for his leadership role. See United States v. Puig-Infante , 19 F.3d 929, 944 (5th Cir. 1994). Evans argues next that the district court erred in calculating his criminal history score. The district court's calculation of Evans’ criminal history score did not rise to the level of plain error. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). Evans also avers that the district court erred in failing to hold a formal evidentiary hearing regarding his claim made pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky , 476 U.S. 79 (1986). A review of the record reveals that Evans was granted the necessary procedural protections in the trial court's review of his Batson challenge. United States v. Clemons , 941 F.2d 321, 324 (5th Cir. 1991). Lastly, Evans argues that 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846 are unconstitutional and violate the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. His contentions are foreclosed by this court’s precedent. This court has determined that §§ 841 and 846 are valid exercises of Congress' commerce power. United States v.
Owens , 996 F.2d 59, 61 (5th Cir. 1993); see also United States v. Lopez , 2 F.3d 1342, 1367 n.50 (5th Cir. 1993), aff’d , 115 S. Ct. 1624, 1630-31 (1995) (reaffirming that all drug trafficking, intrastate as well as interstate, is subject to regulation under the Commerce Clause). Sections 841 and 846 also do not violateNo. 97-50585 -3- the Tenth Amendment. Owens , 996 F.2d at 60-61 (if the challenged statute is a proper exercise of congressional power under the

Commerce Clause, the statute does not violate the Tenth Amendment).
AFFIRMED.
Federal Trade Commission and National Advertising Division, Better Business Bureau

Effective Disclosures in Advertising

May 22, 2001

Communications Challenges of Disclosure Exposure
        - Market most appealing offer while providing accurate information to consumer
        - avoid dissatisfied customers
        - Oversaturation of information
        - customer confusion
        - Complexity of offer
        - limitations of some media

How Do We Overcome This Challenge
        - Integrated multimedia approach
        - Identify best role by medium
        - communication objective
        - disclosure benefit
        - Use target insight to our advantage
        - Electronically savvy target is accustomed to the buy and subscribe proposition

   Disclosure By Roles of Media

Position offer to consumer & spark interest with topline  offer

TV ADVERTISING

Most powerful way to announce  new product introduction and

 illustrate benefits. Call to action drives consumer to 

other sources for more information and track interest 

DIRECT MARKETING ( INTERNET & INCOMING TELEMARKETING)

              Deliver targeted messages and detailed information + generate leads,

	 provides interactive opportunity to answer questions and close  sale. 

 800# prerecorded detailing offer and opportunity to reach live operator,

 before getting the option to subscribe.

MAGAZINE ADVERTISINGGenerates increased reach and frequency.

 Affords more time for consumer to absorb detailed information. Call to action  provides opportunity to get more information and track interest

Electronically Savvy Target

Detailed disclosure more

 fairly provides information

 for consideration of offer 

Clear & Conspicuous

 disclosure  

provides enough 

 info to stimulate action

or close the sale 

The Strategy: Right Medium- Right Information

11

Creative Presentation
        - Television
        - Print
Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

A B

Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Date Created: 7/14/2010

Date Modified: 2/28/2012

Purpose: Compiles PPI of Capital Goods for use in the capital expenditures estimate

File Contents:

Worksheet Contents

Average Calc Calculates the average PPI value for a specified set of years

Data Original PPI data from the BLS

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3444 File Info 1
Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

Range Start 1999 Select first year of the period over which you want to average

Range End 2010 Select last year of the period over which you want to average

Average PPI Value 147.0

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3444 Average Calc 1
Record for the Final Section 316(b) Existing Facilities Rule

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

A B C D E F G H I J

 Producer Price Index-Commodities Data extracted on: November 9, 2011 (1:30:37 PM)

Series Id: WPUSOP3210

Not Seasonally Adjusted

Group: Stage of processing

Item: Manufacturing industries

Base Date: 1982

Series Id Year Period Value

WPUSOP3210 1991 M13 127.8

WPUSOP3210 1992 M13 129.3

WPUSOP3210 1993 M13 131.2

WPUSOP3210 1994 M13 133.2

WPUSOP3210 1995 M13 135.8

WPUSOP3210 1996 M13 137.2

WPUSOP3210 1997 M13 137.7

WPUSOP3210 1998 M13 137.9

WPUSOP3210 1999 M13 138.5

WPUSOP3210 2000 M13 139.5

WPUSOP3210 2001 M13 140.4

WPUSOP3210 2002 M13 140.0

WPUSOP3210 2003 M13 139.9

WPUSOP3210 2004 M13 142.4

WPUSOP3210 2005 M13 146.0

WPUSOP3210 2006 M13 149.2

WPUSOP3210 2007 M13 152.5

WPUSOP3210 2008 M13 157.3

WPUSOP3210 2009 M13 159.2

WPUSOP3210 2010 M13 159.6

EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667-DRAFT-3444 Data 1
"'"o r-4~ ~\ II'. 

i ft ~ 

{-~ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION2 

290 BROADWAY 

~ c:;-1 1-~t PRO,~ NEWYORK, NY 10007-1866 

----- or"" 2 · "0 14 

OCT 2 B 2014 

Mr. William O'Sullivan, Director 

Division of Air Quality 

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 

P.O. Box 402 

401 State Street 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0402 

Dear Mr. O'Sullivan: 

This is in response to New Jersey's October 17, 2014letter transmitting New Jersey's State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) to meet Section 110 requirements for all National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS), visibility and regional haze. The U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) refers to this as an Infrastructure SIP. I am pleased with the submittal of this SIP 

revision as it is one of the goals we set out to achieve. I appreciate the cooperative way your staff 

kept the EPA involved in the various stages of its development. 

We have evaluated the October 17, 2014 SIP revision submittal against the SIP completeness 

criteria found in Title 40, Part 51, Appendix V ofthe Code of Federal Regulations and have 

determined the submittal to be administratively complete except for inclusion of a state adopted 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) program. 

Your submittal notes that to meet the Federal PSD program requirements, New Jersey accepted 

delegation of the PSD program from the EPA on February 22, 1983 and the provisions of 40 

CFR 52.21 (b) through (w), related to Prevention of Significant Deterioration, were incorporated 

into New Jersey's SIP at 40 CFR 52.1603(b). EPA acknowledges that New Jersey accepted 

delegation and implements the Federal permit program required in Part C of the Clean Air Act. 

The Clean Air Act Section 110, however, requires a State rule to fully satisfy the Federal PSD 

provisions. EPA will note this in the Federal Register when we propose action on this SIP 

revision and will note that a Federal Implementation Plan is in effect, but nothing further is 

needed from New Jersey to address this requirement. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable 011 BIIMd Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 50% Postconaumer content) 
I look forward to continuing our cooperative effort to attain the NAAQS in New Jersey. If you or 

your staff have any questions regarding EPA's review of this SIP revision, please contact Richard 

Ruvo, Chief of the Air Programs Branch, at (212) 637-4014. 

Sincerely yours, 

;4 1 

ohnft~~~A Clean Air and Sustainability Division 

cc: Jane Herndon, Assistant Commissioner 

Chris Salmi, NJDEP 

Sharon Davis, NJDEP
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7928 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7928

  To expand the payment of principal, interest, and fees for certain 
      disaster loans under the CARES Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 2020

  Mrs. Fletcher (for herself and Mr. Olson) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To expand the payment of principal, interest, and fees for certain 
      disaster loans under the CARES Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Loan Interest Forgiveness for 
Taxpayers Under a Pandemic Act of 2020'' or the ``LIFT UP Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. DEBT RELIEF UNDER THE CARES ACT.

    Section 1112(a) of the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) made during the period beginning on January 1, 2015, 
        and ending on the day before the date of enactment of this 
        paragraph--
                    ``(A) to a business concern under section 7(b)(1) 
                of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)) that is 
                unrelated to the COVID-19 pandemic; or
                    ``(B) under section 7(b)(2) of the Small Business 
                Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(2)) that is unrelated to the 
                COVID-19 pandemic.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23


                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants
                    -----------------------------------------

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
    incorporation by reference of our reports dated November 1, 1996,
    included in or incorporated by reference into Thermo Ecotek Corporation's
    Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 1996, into the
    Company's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
    33-91538), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-91542),
    Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-91546), Registration Statement
    on Form S-8 (No. 33-91544), Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
    33-91548), and Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-80753).



                                                Arthur Andersen LLP



    Boston, Massachusetts
    December 5, 1996