alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 776 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 136
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 776

                          [Report No. 116-176]

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2019

     Mr. King of New York (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. 
Butterfield, and Mr. Stewart) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

                             July 23, 2019

  Additional sponsors: Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Costa, Mr. 
 Golden, Mr. Ruppersberger, Mrs. Axne, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Rush, Mr. Soto, 
Mr. Cole, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Ms. Pingree, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mr. 
          Johnson of South Dakota, Mr. Walden, and Mr. Sablan

                             July 23, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Medical Services for 
Children Program Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2014, and'' and inserting ``2014,''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 136

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 776

                          [Report No. 116-176]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2019

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Forlink Software Corporation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Yi He,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Yi HeYi
      HeChief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 30, 2009
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 12


                      STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS


                      BancWest Corporation and Subsidiaries
         Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           THREE MONTHS ENDED          SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                 JUNE 30,                   JUNE 30,
                                         ----------------------      ----------------------
                                           2000          1999          2000          1999
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------
                                                       (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                      <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Income before income taxes               $ 93,244      $ 74,308      $178,046      $148,905
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------

Fixed charges(1):
     Interest expense                     137,530       109,295       259,645       217,588
     Rental expense                         3,808         3,756         7,537         7,577
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------
                                          141,338       113,051       267,182       225,165
Less interest on deposits                 110,313        89,507       209,811       177,380
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------

     Net fixed charges                     31,025        23,544        57,371        47,785
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------

     Earnings, excluding
        interest on deposits             $124,269      $ 97,852      $235,417      $196,690
                                         ========      ========      ========      ========

     Earnings, including
        interest on deposits             $234,582      $187,359      $445,228      $374,070
                                         ========      ========      ========      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

     Excluding interest on deposits         4.01X         4.16x         4.10X         4.12x

     Including interest on deposits         1.66X         1.66x         1.67X         1.66x
</TABLE>

(1) For purposes of computing the consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed
    charges, earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges.
    Fixed charges, excluding interest on deposits, include interest (other than
    on deposits), whether expensed or capitalized, and that portion of rental
    expense (generally one third) deemed representative of the interest factor.
    Fixed charges, including interest on deposits, consists of the foregoing
    items plus interest on deposits.
#### Robert Miles HEITZEBERG, Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

 

CertificationFurnished Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Financial Corporation (the"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on November 15, 2005 (the "Report"), the undersigned,who is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
-  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

|                       |  |                                                                                       |
|-----------------------|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |  |
| By:    |  | /s/ David W. Mann                                                                     |
|                       |  | David W. Mann

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2005 |

 

* *

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FirstFinancial Corporation and will be retained by First Financial Corporation. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 98-20213 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROGELIO ALVAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-314-7

- - - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Rogelio Alvarez has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 396 U.S. 738 (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
null

519.2216
#### Troy E. REEVES, Appellant, v. Celia B. REEVES, Appellee.

No. T-462.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 14, 1974.

Keith J. Kinderman, Tallahassee, for appellant.

R. Worth Moore, and Edward J. Hill of Watkins & Hill, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record, briefs and argument of respective counsel being considered and it appearing upon such consideration that prejudicial error has not been demonstrated, the judgment appealed herein is

Affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.
#### Bobby F. THORPE v. Rex COSBY et al.

No. 50452.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 19, 1978.

Hugh L. Bailey, Sr., Winona, for appellant.

Campbell & DeLong, Roy D. Campbell, Jr., Roy D. Campbell, III, Greenville, for appellee.

*928Before PATTERSON, C. J., BROOM and LEE, JJ., and JAMES D. HESTER, Commissioner.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0510 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ALAN EDWIN ERICKSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 1 5 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 9 2023

01/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0510
----

**EXHIBIT        32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO **

**18        U.S.C. §1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  January 12, 2007 | By:    | /s/                  Vincent L. Kasch    |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                                    |   | Vincent                  L. Kasch        |
|                                    |   | Chief                  Financial Officer |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                Jul-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                        $    32,788
<SECURITIES>                                  $         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 $ 2,343,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                  $    20,000
<INVENTORY>                                   $         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              $ 5,146,505
<PP&E>                                        $   876,489
<DEPRECIATION>                                $   764,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $ 6,185,374
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $ 4,508,535
<BONDS>                                       $         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         $         0
<PREFERRED>                                   $         0
<COMMON>                                      $    10,897
<OTHER-SE>                                    $   746,737
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  $ 6,185,374
<SALES>                                       $ 6,246,390
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $ 6,246,390
<CGS>                                         $ 4,460,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $ 4,460,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $ 2,202,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              $         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $    93,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $  (510,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  $         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $  (510,443)
<DISCONTINUED>                                $         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               $         0
<CHANGES>                                     $         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $  (510,443)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 $      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 $      (.05)
        


</TABLE>
#### Delter McCoy CATES, Petitioner, v. S. D. “Dave” STARR, Sheriff, Orange County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-828.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 19, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Sentigen Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Fredrick B. Rolff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.

Date: March 22, 2004

                             /s/ Fredrick B. Rolff
                             -------------------------------
                             Name:  Fredrick B. Rolff
                             Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SENTIGEN HOLDING CORP. AND WILL BE
RETAINED SENTIGEN HOLDING CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15544 and #15545; VIRGINIA Disaster Number VA-00071]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Virginia dated 05/30/2018. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storm and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         04/15/2018.
 DATES: Issued on 05/30/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/30/2018. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/04/2019.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Lynchburg City *Contiguous Counties:* Virginia: Amherst, Bedford, Campbell. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
7.160Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.580Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.580Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 15544C and for economic injury is 155450. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Virginia. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Dated: May 30, 2018. Linda E. McMahon, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2018-12185 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30618

RENOALD MUSE, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden; RICHARD IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-4030-C-6

--------------------- November 14, 1996 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The district court granted Renoald Muse, Louisiana inmate #1222218, a certificate of appealability (COA) on one issue, whether the 99-year prison sentence, without benefit of parole, was proportional under the Eighth Amendment to the offense of conviction. Even if the district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 to issue a COA, we conclude that the issue, in light of the argument presented on appeal, is frivolous for essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court inNo. 96-30618 - 2 -

** Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963). denying relief. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. If this court were to hold that the district court lacks the authority to grant a COA, the notice of appeal filed by Muse would be construed as a request for the issuance of a COA on both habeas claims presented in his habeas petition: 1) a Brady ** violation by the prosecution’s failure to disclose before trial that one robbery victim failed to identify her assailant from a photo array and 2) an Eighth Amendment violation premised on an excessive sentence. See Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Because Muse fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, see § 2253(c)(2), IT IS ORDERED that COA is
DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED. COA DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,495,258 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,970,135 
<ALLOWANCES>                                       330,410 
<INVENTORY>                                      5,535,049 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,606,427 
<PP&E>                                          82,252,591 
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,458,024 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,874,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,562,374 
<BONDS>                                         28,167,822 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,175,261 
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,447,233 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,874,758 
<SALES>                                         20,517,763 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,146,533 
<CGS>                                           18,381,990 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,288,520 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,522,929 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    953,094 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       579,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,042,175 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,042,175 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.55 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.55           
                                                


</TABLE>