alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.1

                                    AGREEMENT

     This  Lock-Up  Agreement  is made as of the  date  set  forth  below by the
undersigned  holders  of the  Common  Stock,  par value  $0.0001  per share (the
"Common  Stock"),  of San Juan  Financial,  Inc.,  a Colorado  corporation  (the
"Company"),  with the Company in connection  with the proposed  public  offering
(the "Offering") of 5,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock.

     WHEREAS,  the undersigned wish to provide for an orderly trading market for
the Common Stock during the period  following the  commencement  of the Offering
and to induce investors to participate in the Offering.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recital and for other good
and  valuable  consideration,  the  receipt  and  adequacy  of which are  hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     Each of the parties  hereto  severally,  and not jointly,  agrees that such
party will not,  without the prior written consent of the Company,  for a period
of two years after the effective  date of the  Registration  Statement  filed in
connection with the Offering,  (the "Effective  Date"),  directly or indirectly,
offer, sell, grant any option to purchase, contract to sell or otherwise sell or
dispose of any shares of Common  Stock,  any options or warrants to purchase any
shares of Common Stock, or any securities  convertible  into or exchangeable for
shares of Common  Stock owned by the  undersigned  or with  respect to which the
undersigned has the power of  disposition,  or announce any offer to do so. Each
of the parties hereto  severally,  and not jointly,  also agrees and consents to
the  entry of stop  transfer  instructions  with the  Company's  transfer  agent
against  the  transfer of shares of Common  Stock held by such person  except in
compliance  with the foregoing  restriction.  This  Agreement may be executed in
counterparts,   all  of  which  together  shall  constitute  one  and  the  same
instrument.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Lock-Up Agreement as
of the Effective Date.




--------------------------------
Print Name:


Accepted and agreed to as of the Effective Date:

SAN JUAN FINANCIAL, INC.
      a Colorado corporation





--------------------------------
By:_____________________________
Its:_____________________________



<PAGE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00246

- CR

P AUL A LLEN W ARD

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On A ppeal from the County Court at Law

of Hood County ( 51433 )

February 4, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgmen t. It is ordered that the trial court ’ s judgment

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
[ STUDENT LOAN PAYMENT REDUCTION - PRE-QUALIFICATION NOTICE 

: You have been Pre - Qualified to reduce your student loan payments through the 

Student Loan Document Preparation and Processing Services Program. 

EST. CURRENT LOAN EST. CURRENT PMT 

$91,000 $1,110 

EST. NEW RATE EST. NEW PAYMENT 

SUBSIDIZED $68 

Your student loan has been identified as eligible for 

the Student Loan Reform Act which can save you 

thousands on your current student loans. 

You are now eligible to reduce your estimated 

monthly payments of $1,110 down to as low as $68 

which may save you $122,445 over the term of your 

student loan. 

For details about your eligibility please contact one 

of our representatives TODAY. 

Refe.ence # : STlN 

Reply by: 12/31/2014 

1-888-402-4006 

Monday - Saturday 

7AM-6PM PST 

EST. CURRENT PAYOFF EST. CURRENT TERM 

$129,220 10-25 YEARS 

EST. NEW PAYOFF EST. LOAN SAVINGS 

$6,776 $122,445 

1-888-402-4006 

Popular Program Benefits: 

• No Negative Impact on your credit 

• No Program Payments for up to 90 

days upon enrollment 

• 100% Total Loan Forgiveness based 

on qualificaticms 

Have this information ready: 

Reference#: STLNWe can help with any situation. 

*Terms and Conditions: All program representations are provided for illustration purposes only and based on borrowers with 

approx. $91,000 in student loan debt the company has helped. Monthly payment amount and term is subject to individual 

financial analysis and may be different from example based on programs that are available to borrower through the U.S. 

Department of Education. AF Student Services provides document preparation and processing services for a fee. This offer is 

to provide such service and is not sponsored or connected with the government or DOE. All student loan assistance plans are 

subject to lender approval. This is not nor is AF affiliated with a government agency. Loan forgiveness is based on government • 

regulated qualifications and may apply. This is not a loan. Please direct all questions and inquiries to 1-888-402-4006 

Case 4:18-cv-00806 Document 1-1 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 2 

Complaint Exhibit A-1
Student Loan Payment Reduction Dept. 

I 1111111111111111 111111111111111 IIIII IIIII IIIII IIII IIII 

38*1 *13599**** .. ********"*3-DIGIT 921 

San Diego, CA 92104·39.,3 

11 11111• 1•11•l•1•11 1111llilll"11111 1

1111•

1111111l111111 11l1l11 11ll 

Deliver Directly to Add ressee 

P~E5,ORTE0 

FIFIST CLASS MAil 

U.S. POSTAGE 

PAD 

5ACRAME'ITO, CA 

PERMIT ;t 1297 

S£E TITLE 18 SEC. 1702- US CODE 

Case 4:18-cv-00806 Document 1-1 Filed 02/07/18 Page 2 of 2 

Complaint Exhibit A-2
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30598

Summary Calendar

SARAH ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF NEW ORLEANS,

formerly known as Associated Catholic Charities,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(98-CV-1015-F)

December 22, 1999

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Sarah Armstrong appeals the district court’s grant

of summary judgment for defendant Associated Catholic Charities

(“ACC”) in this Title VII employment discrimination case. We

affirm.

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. See Armstrong

v. City of Dallas, 997 F.2d 62, 65 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Armstrong, who is African-American was fired from her position

as a supervisor at the Kenner Adult Day Health Care Center, which
2

is an arm of ACC. Armstrong established a prima facie case of

discrimination. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S.

792, 802 (1973). The burden therefore shifted to ACC, who

articulated a non-discriminatory reason for its decision, stating

that Armstrong was fired based on the report of two subordinates

that she directed a worker to withhold client care, using

disparaging language concerning the client. See id. Armstrong

attempted to create a fact issue on the question of whether ACC’s

articulated reason was pretextual by introducing evidence

concerning a white employee who made a disparaging remark about a

client and was not fired. See id. at 804. This evidence, standing

alone, does not create a fact question on pretext because the white

employee was not similarly situated; there is no evidence that the

white employee had supervisory responsibilities or that she

withheld care or instructed other employees to withhold care from

a client. See Krystek v. Univ. of S. Miss., 164 F.3d 251, 257 (5th

Cir. 1999). 

Finding no genuine issue of material fact in this record that

would preclude summary judgment for ACC, we affirm the grant of

summary judgment for essentially the reasons set out in the

district court’s opinion. See Armstrong v. Associated Catholic

Charities, 98-CV-1015-F, (E.D. LA. May 13, 1999)(unpublished).

AFFIRMED.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

        ThisEmployment Agreement is made effective as of this 1st day of July,2001, by and between Fortune Natural Resources Corporation, a Delawarecorporation (“Employer”) and Tyrone J. Fairbanks(“Employee”).

        WHEREAS,prior to the date hereof, Employee served in the employ of Employer in thecapacity of president and chief executive officer pursuant to an employmentagreement dated June 1, 1997; and

        WHEREAS,the parties desire to abrogate their earlier employment agreement and theirrespective rights and duties thereunder in favor of the terms and conditions setforth herein; and

        WHEREAS,Employer’s board of directors desires to recognize Employee’scontinuing importance to the ongoing operations of Employer and Employee’sknowledge of and experience with the business of Employer and desires to providean incentive and inducement for Employee to continue in his present capacity;and

        WHEREAS,Employee is willing to continue in the employ of Employer on the terms andconditions and for the term set forth herein.

        NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and of the mutual and dependentcovenants hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, thereceipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agreeas follows:

        1.        EMPLOYMENT AND DUTIES

        Employerhereby employs Employee on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth as itspresident and chief executive officer, or such other executive capacity as theBoard of Directors may from time to time prescribe, and Employee hereby acceptssuch employment upon such terms and conditions for the period hereinafter fixed.Employee shall not be required to spend any extended periods outside theHouston, Texas metropolitan area, except that Employee agrees to make routinebusiness trips of reasonable duration for the benefit of Employer and itsbusiness and in the discharge of Employee’s duties hereunder.

        2.        PERFORMANCE

        Employeeagrees to devote substantially all of his business time and efforts to theperformance of his duties as an executive of Employer as specified from time totime by the Board of Directors of Employer. During the term of this Agreement,Employee shall not engage in any business that is competitive with Employer,either through ownership (other than ownership of securities of publicly heldcorporations of which Employee owns less than 5% of any class of outstandingsecurities) or as a director, officer, agent, employee or consultant.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7407 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7407

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out or support a program 
            that distributes hypodermic needles or syringes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2020

 Mr. LaMalfa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out or support a program 
            that distributes hypodermic needles or syringes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mandatory End to Needle Distribution 
in Our Neighborhoods Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR HYPODERMIC NEEDLES OR SYRINGES.

    After the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services and 
the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may not 
use Federal funds to carry out or support a program that distributes a 
hypodermic needle or syringe to an individual for the use of an illegal 
drug. Nothing in the preceding sentence shall be construed as applying 
with respect to the lawful use of a prescription drug.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 001 6 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 24, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0016
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 776 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 776

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2019

     Mr. King of New York (for himself, Ms. Castor of Florida, Mr. 
Butterfield, and Mr. Stewart) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Medical Services for 
Children Program Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2014, and'' and inserting ``2014,''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1





August 5, 2013Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Brad Borror918-588-7582





ONEOK and ONEOK Partners to Participate in the


Tuohy Brothers Annual Energy Conference





TULSA, Okla . – Aug. 5, 2013 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the 4 th  Annual Tuohy Brothers Annual Energy Conference on Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2013, in New York City.





John W. Gibson, ONEOK and ONEOK Partners chairman and chief executive officer, and Terry K. Spencer, ONEOK and ONEOK Partners president, will conduct a series of meetings with investment-community representatives at the conference.








ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is a diversified energy company. We are the general partner and own 43.3 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) as of June 30, 2013, one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  ONEOK is among the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, serving more than 2 million customers in Oklahoma, Kansas and Texas.  ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Stock Index.





For more information, visit the websites at  www.oneok.com  or www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews  and


@ONEOKPartners .





###
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7799 

To designate a portion of United States Route 80 in Alabama as the ‘‘John 

R. Lewis Voting Rights Highway’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2020 

Mr. COHEN (for himself, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Ms. NORTON, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. PALMER, Mrs. ROBY, 

Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. CARSON

of Indiana, Mr. CISNEROS, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. COURTNEY, 

Mr. COOPER, Mr. COX of California, Ms. DEAN, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. 

DEUTCH, Mr. EVANS, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. 

KELLY of Illinois, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. KILMER, Ms. MOORE, Mr. MCEACHIN, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mrs. 

NAPOLITANO, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. RUSH, Mr. WOODALL, Ms. WILSON of 

Florida, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. NEGUSE, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. 

SHALALA, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. SUOZZI, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. 

VELA, Mr. WELCH, Mr. SOTO, Mr. CASE, Mr. CICILLINE, Mrs. DINGELL, 

Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. GARAMENDI, and Ms. KENDRA S. HORN of Oklahoma) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate a portion of United States Route 80 in Alabama as the ‘‘John R. Lewis Voting Rights Highway’’, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7799 IH

1 SECTION 1. RENAMING PORTION OF UNITED STATES 

2 ROUTE 80. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The portion of United States 

4 Route 80 from Selma, Alabama to Montgomery, Alabama 

5 shall be known as the ‘‘John R. Lewis Voting Rights 

6 Highway’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the portion of United States Route 80 from 

10 Selma, Alabama to Montgomery, Alabama is deemed to 

11 be a reference to the ‘‘John R. Lewis Voting Rights High12 way’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         867,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  908,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,262,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,210,000
<PP&E>                                       4,384,000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,647,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,508,000
<BONDS>                                      2,262,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    71,833,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,000<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,647,000
<SALES>                                      7,024,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,024,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,890,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,367,000<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,233,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,233,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,233,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
<FN>
<F1>This value is net of depreciation.
<F2>Value represents redeemable common stock warrants.
<F3>Amount includes $57,000 of interest income.
</FN>


</TABLE>
ex10_33.htm






  





  











  








Non-Employee Director Compensation


Adopted December 2013, Effective as of January 1, 2014







Annual compensation for non-employee directors is as follows: Chairman of the Board, $250,000 (cash payment, $102,575); Chaiman of the Audit Committee, $180,000 (cash payment, $66,950) and all other non-employee directors, $75,000 (cash payment, $24,750).  The number of shares subject to the non-employee director option is calculated using the Black-Sholes option pricing model (with a maximum of 60,000 shares).








	
1.  

	
Options are granted to non-employee directors serving on January 1st and vest in equal installments on the first day of January, April, July and October each year. The cash portion of annual compensation is paid in equal quantity installments on the first day of January, April, July and October each year.













	
2.  

	
Equity compensation of a non-employee director starting his service at the beginning of a quarter (other than January 1st) will be prorated for the number of days remaining in the year.  The director will be granted an option that vests in equal installments on the first day of April, July and/or October, as appropriate for the balance of the year beginning on the day of grant.  Cash and equity compensation for a new director elected at the Company’s annual meeting will commence the ensuing quarter (July 1st).













	
3.  

	
Quarterly cash compensation of a new non-employee director starting service during a quarter will be prorated for the number of days remaining in the quarter he starts; equity compensation will be prorated for the number of days remaining in the year. The director will be granted an option that vests on the day of grant with respect to the number of shares equal to the daily prorated amount of shares multiplied by the number of days remaining in the quarter he starts, with the remainder of the shares vesting in equal installments for the balance of the year on the first day of April, July and/or October, as appropriate. For example, if a new director starts his service March 1st, assuming a 5,000 share option annual equity compensation, the new director would receive an option for 4,192 shares,1 with 4252 shares being fully vested and the balance of 3,767 shares vesting in installments of 1,255 shares on the first day of April, July and October.













	
4.  

	
Any non-vested portion of a non-employee director option will automatically be cancelled if a director’s service terminates during the year.














  

1 5,000 shares/365 = 13.6986/day x 306 days = 4,192 shares (rounded to the nearest whole share).




  

2 5,000 shares/365 = 13.6986/day x 31 days = 425 shares (rounded to the nearest whole share).
#### Fisher SMITH et al. v. Charlie SMITH et al.

No. 50330.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 24, 1978.

Mitchell, Rogers, Eskridge, Yoge & Clayton, Dennis W. Voge, Tupelo, for appellants.

S. H. Long, Tupelo, for appellees.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and LEE and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.