alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00411

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.G.P. & D.J.P., minor children,

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- 06

- 30038

- CV Spencer Whitewood Brown, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed in this court on July 7, 2015

. The trial court extended appellant’s time to pay the filing fee to July 17, 2015. To this date, appellant has not paid the $19 5 filing fee nor made any showing that appellant is excused by statute or rule from paying the filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5, 20. Appellant has also failed to file a docketing

statement.

I t is therefore ORDERED appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days of t he date of this order that either: (1) the filing fee has been paid; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the filing fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5, 42.3(c)

. All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending the payment of the filing fee.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 24 83

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Hol li e Tel fo rd ; Br en daBu rto n ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff s - Ap pe ll an ts

v. Alan B. Jo hn so n; NenaJames, in he r in di vi du al off ic ia l capa ci ty; Ro ckSp rin gs Hou si ng Autho rit y ; Ap ril Tho m ps on ; Gl ob al E. LL C, al so kn ownas P io ne er Pa rk ; Ann Cla yto n; Ju dy Cirri ll o; Does 1-1 0; Cen tu ry Lin k; Hol li e Po rti ll o; O'Kell ey H. Pear so n; Law Offic e Hic ke y an d Ev an s LLP; Tho m as Deeri ng , in hi s i nd iv idua l an d of fic ia l cap aci ty; Uni te d St at es of Am eri ca; Don al d Tha tc he r; Eva Tafo y a; HUD

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof S ou th Dako ta- Pie rre

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Ju ne 22 , 20 18 Fi le d: Ju ne 27 , 20 18 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re LOKEN, BOW MAN, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu itJu dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Hol li e Telf or d an d Bren da Bu rto n ap pe al fro m th e or de r of th e Dis tri ct Co urt 1 gr an ti ng de fen da nt s’ m ot io ns to di sm is s th is pr o se ci vi l act io n ari si ng fro m a ho us in g m at te r. App el la nt s ha ve id en ti fie d no de fen si bl e ba si s fo r rev ers al , an d we fin d no ne . W e aff irm. See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Ro be rto A. Lan ge , Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e Dis tri ct 1 of So ut h Dak ot a. -2

-
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q/A
 Amendment No. 1
 þ
    
    QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from <> to <>
 Commission file number: 0-20167
 MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
  MICHIGAN
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    38-2062816
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)130 SOUTH CEDAR STREET, MANISTIQUE, MI
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    49854
(Zip Code)
  þ o
 o o
  Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer o
Non-accelerated Filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company þ  o þ




---



##### Table of Contents



Explanatory Note




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION PART II. OTHER INFORMATIONItem 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-KMACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION SIGNATURESEX-31.1EX-31.2EX-99.1EX-99.2    Table of Contents  
 OTHER INFORMATION
 
 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
  Exhibit 31.1
    
    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.Exhibit 31.2
    
    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.*Exhibit 32.1
    
    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.*Exhibit 32.2
    
    Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.Exhibit 99.1
    
    Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 111(b) of EESA.Exhibit 99.2
    
    Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 111(b) of EESA.
 
 *
    
    Previously filed or furnished as an exhibit to Mackinac Financial
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2010.




---



##### Table of Contents



MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Registrant)Date: August 20, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Ernie R. KruegerERNIE R. KRUEGEREVP/CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
(principal financial and accounting officer)
<PAGE>

                             CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF
                                CCC CAPITAL TRUST


     This Certificate of Trust of CCC Capital Trust (the "Trust"), dated
February 12, 2001, is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as
trustees, to form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12
Del. C. Sections 3801 et seq.) (The "Act").

     1. NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is CCC Capital Trust.

     2. DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the
        Trust with a principal place of business in the State of Delaware are:
        Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100 North Market Street,
        Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention: Corporate Trust
        Administration.

     3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective as of
        February 12, 2001.



<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the trustees of the Trust, have
executed this Certificate of Trust as of the date first above written.


                                 REID E. SIMPSON, not in his individual
                                 capacity but solely as Trustee


                                   /s/ Reid E. Simpson
                                 ----------------------------------------------


                                 ROBERT GUTTMAN, not in his individual capacity
                                 but solely as Trustee


                                    /s/ Robert Guttman
                                 -----------------------------------------------



                                 WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                                 capacity but solely as Trustee


                                 By:      /s/ Donald G. MacKelcan
                                    -------------------------------------
                                 Name:  Donald G. MacKelcan
                                 Title: Vice President
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31212 Summary Calendar

__________________ DEBRA G. MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-1261 - - - - - - - - - - May 20, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Debra G. Moore appeals the district court's judgment for the defendant and dismissal of this Federal Tort Claims Act action. The district court's finding that Moore failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that her fall was caused by a defect is not clearly erroneous. See Broussard v. United States , 989 F.2d 171, 178 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. John Eric WOLFE, Appellee.

No. 72-619.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 29, 1972.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nelson E. Bailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Joseph A. Varón of Varón, Stahl & Kay, P. A., Hollywood, for appellee.

OWEN, Judge.

The State appeals an order of discharge entered pursuant to Rule 3.191 CrPR., 33 F.S.A. We reverse.

Appellee, John Eric Wolfe, was charged with the crime of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree upon Barbara McAdoo. He was taken into custody on this charge on November 5, 1971, and within two weeks he was arraigned and a trial date set for January 17, 1972. In January, 1972 the State moved for and obtained an order granting a continuance on the ground that an essential witness, Barbara McAdoo, was unable to attend trial because she was then hospitalized in Massachusetts as a result of wounds received from the offense alleged in the information. The trial was re-scheduled for April 5th. On March 30th the State again moved for and obtained an order of continuance because the same witness, although discharged from the hospital, was still physically unable to travel from Massachusetts to attend trial. On that date an order was entered re-setting the trial for May 2nd, a date which was 182 days after Wolfe was initially taken into custody. *204On May 2nd the trial commenced and a jury partially selected. The following day defendant filed his motion for discharge on the ground that he had not been brought to trial within the 180 days provided under Rule 3.191(a)(1) CrPR.

The unavailability of Miss Mc-Adoo, an essential witness in the State’s case, due to wounds allegedly received as a result of the offense with which the defendant was accused, is clearly an exceptional circumstance within the contemplation of Rule 3.191(f) CrPR. Thus, the continuances ordered by the court in January and again in March were justified under this provision of the Rule. When such exceptional circumstances are made to appear, the court may set a new trial date which is within a reasonable time. The order of March 30th, re-scheduling the trial from April 5th to May 2nd, clearly met this requirement under the circumstances of this case. Not only was the new trial date within 4 weeks of the previously scheduled trial date (which in and of itself we view as meeting the requirement of being re-set “within a reasonable time”), but also the new trial date was only a few days beyond the date which the court could have arbitrarily set absent any “exceptional circumstances”.

Since we conclude that the trial date of May 2nd was within the period contemplated by Rule 3.191 CrPR, we do not need to consider the question of whether defendant had affirmatively waived his right to insist upon trial within 180 days of his arrest by virtue of commencing the trial on the 182nd day without objection and waiting until the following day to file the motion for discharge.

The order appealed is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings.

REED, C. J., and CROSS, J., concur.
#### Robert H. SPAIN, Appellant, v. Doyle ROGERS et al., Appellees.

No. 72-830.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 8, 1974.

Rehearing Denied April 2, 1974.

Robert M. Sturrup, Faircloth, Sturrup & Della-Donna, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

C. Robert Burns, Burns, Middleton, Farrell & Faust, Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review an order of the Circuit Court for Broward County, Florida, confirming an arbiter’s award of attorney’s fees.

We are of the opinion that the trial court erred in confirming as reasonable the attorney’s fees as awarded by the arbiter without having for its review a transcript of the proceedings before the arbiter on which the award of attorney’s fees was based. Therefore, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with the views herein expressed.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.

POULTON, TIMOTHY P., Associate Judge, dissents, with opinion.

POULTON, TIMOTHY P„ Associate Judge

(dissenting):

Respectfully, I dissent. I would affirm the decision of the trial court.

At the instance of Spain, the trial court caused paragraph two to be a part of the final judgment entered earlier in the case, upon the theory that canon 13 of the code of ethics governing attorneys, 32 F.S.A., required it. It was not required to be part of the final judgment because of any con*210tract, statute, rule or other law. By the time the matter, had been litigated before the arbiter, canon 13 no longer existed.

If the trial court’s function in “supervising” pursuant to that paragraph was one of appeal, then I would join in the view of my colleagues, because there was no record before the trial court of the proceedings in arbitration. If the “supervision” required a trial *de novo,*I would also share the view of my colleagues because rules of evidence pertaining to judicial notice would apply. However, we have found no authority for the proposition that the supervision required by canon 13 and provided for in the earlier final judgment amounts either to appellate supervision or trial *de novo*supervision. This being so, we believe that the sort of supervision provided by the trial court — and described in the order appealed from — was sufficient to comply with the earlier final judgment. When possible, courts should strive to uphold the finality of arbitration. 3 Fla.Jur., Arbitration & Award, § 15.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549


Form 6-K


REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the month of March 2024.


Commission File Number 33-65728


CHEMICAL AND MINING COMPANY OF CHILE INC.


(Translation of registrant’s name into English)


El Trovador 4285, Santiago, Chile (562) 2425-2000


(Address of principal executive office)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.


Form 20-F:_ X _  Form 40-F



















---







BOARD MEMBER RESIGNATION





Santiago, Chile, March 20, 2024 – Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) (NYSE: SQM; Santiago Stock Exchange: SQM-A, SQM-B, the “Company”), informs that today, we received a resignation letter from board member Xu Tieying; this resignation will become effective as of April 24, 2024.










---




About SQM





SQM is a global company that is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Santiago Stock Exchange (NYSE: SQM; Santiago Stock Exchange: SQM-B, SQM-A). SQM develops and produces diverse products for several industries essential for human progress, such as health, nutrition, renewable energy and technology through innovation and technological development. We aim to maintain our leading world position in the lithium, potassium nitrate, iodine and thermo-solar salts markets.





For further information, contact:





Gerardo Illanes  / gerardo.illanes@sqm.com


Irina Axenova  / irina.axenova@sqm.com


Isabel Bendeck  / isabel.bendeck@sqm.com





For media inquiries, contact:





Maria Ignacia Lopez / ignacia.lopez@sqm.com


Pablo Pisani / pablo.pisani@sqm.com


.







---




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





CHEMICAL AND MINING COMPANY OF CHILE INC.(Registrant)Date: March 20, 2024/s/ Gerardo IllanesBy: Gerardo IllanesCFO





Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained SEC 1815 (04-09) in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays currently valid OMB control number.
2009 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

1-13-2009

In Re: Michael Nittolo

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 08-1862

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Michael Nittolo " (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 2043.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/2043
HLD-146 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1862

___________

IN RE: MICHAEL NITTOLO,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the New Jersey 

(Related to 06-cv-00194)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

August 29, 2008

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and GARTH, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: January 13, 2009)

_________

OPINION OF THE COURT

_________

PER CURIAM.

Pro se petitioner Michael Nittolo seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United

States District Court for the District of New Jersey to rule upon his motion to vacate

sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The District Court entered an order denying

Nittolo’s § 2255 motion on October 20, 2008. Therefore, we will deny the petition for

writ of mandamus as moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000861067
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM IV - SERIES 6, L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         13694
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13694
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               51357
<PP&E>                                         2016391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1867497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16658
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     183593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200251
<SALES>                                        236376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               236376
<CGS>                                          126858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               23079
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   86439
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7832 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7832

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, as the ``Benny C. Martinez 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2020

Ms. Garcia of Texas (for herself, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Roy, Mr. Taylor, 
 Mr. Olson, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Castro of Texas, Mr. Carter of 
   Texas, Mr. Babin, Mr. Flores, Mr. Hurd of Texas, Mr. Wright, Mr. 
   Cuellar, and Mr. Veasey) introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, as the ``Benny C. Martinez 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENNY C. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4020 Broadway Street in Houston, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Benny C. Martinez Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Benny C. 
Martinez Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Squire McGRIFF, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-396.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 14, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 8, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 439 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-162, CP2018-233.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-12743 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12--P