UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSI 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

In the Matter of 

Ardagh Group S.A., 

a public limited liability company, and 

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, 

a corporation, and 

Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc., 

a corporation. 

) 

) 

) PUBLIC 

) 

) 

) DOCKET NO. 9356 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

-------------------------- ) 

RESPONDENT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR IN CAMERA TREATMENT OF 

EXHffiiTS TO RESPONDENT'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO COMPLAINT 

COUNSEL'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OF 

RESPONDENTS' POSSffiLE DIVESTITURES TO UNDETERMINED BUYERS 

[REDACTED- IN CAMERA TREATMENT 

REQUESTED] 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

______________________________________

In the Matter of 

Ardagh Group S.A., 

a public limited liability company, and

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, 

a corporation, and 

Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc., 

a corporation. 

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PUBLIC

DOCKET NO. 9356 

DECLARATION OF JAMES J. FREDLAKE 

I, James J. Fredlake, declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, as 

follows:

[REDACTED - IN CAMERA

TREATMENT REQUESTED]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

______________________________________

In the Matter of 

Ardagh Group S.A., 

a public limited liability company, and

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, 

a corporation, and 

Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc., 

a corporation. 

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PUBLIC

DOCKET NO. 9356 

DECLARATION OF NICHOLAS HEWITT 

I, Nicholas Hewitt, declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, as 

follows:

[REDACTED - IN CAMERA

TREATMENT REQUESTED]
 1 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

______________________________________

In the Matter of 

Ardagh Group S.A., 

a public limited liability company, and

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, 

a corporation, and 

Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc., 

a corporation. 

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PUBLIC

DOCKET NO. 9356 

STATEMENT REGARDING MEET AND CONFER

 On December 11, 2013, Respondent’s counsel, Jason M. Swergold, conferred with 

Complaint Counsel, Amanda Hamilton, regarding Respondent’s Unopposed Motion for In

Camera Treatment of Exhibits to Respondent’s Memorandum in Opposition to Complaint 

Counsel’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Any Evidence of Respondents’ Possible Divestitures to 

Undetermined Buyers. Complaint Counsel has indicated that they do not oppose Respondent’s 

motion.

Dated: December 11, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 

By: /s/ Richard F. Schwed

Richard F. Schwed 

Alan S. Goudiss 

Wayne Dale Collins 

Lisl Joanne Dunlop 

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 

599 Lexington Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

Telephone: (212) 848-4000 

rschwed@shearman.com 
 2 

Heather L. Kafele

SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 

801 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. 

Washington, DC 20004 

Telephone: (202) 508-8000 

Facsimile: (202) 508 8100 

Counsel for Respondent Ardagh Group 

S.A.
 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

______________________________________

In the Matter of 

Ardagh Group S.A., 

a public limited liability company, and

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, 

a corporation, and 

Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc., 

a corporation. 

______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

PUBLIC 

DOCKET NO. 9356 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR IN

CAMERA TREATMENT OF EXHIBITS TO RESPONDENT’S MEMORANDUM IN 

OPPOSITION TO COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE 

ANY EVIDENCE OF RESPONDENTS’ POSSIBLE DIVESTITURES TO 

UNDETERMINED BUYERS

 Upon consideration of Respondent’s Unopposed Motion For In Camera Treatment of 

Exhibits to Respondent’s Memorandum in Opposition to Complaint Counsel’s Motion In Limine

to Exclude Any Evidence of Respondents’ Possible Divestitures to Undetermined Buyers, it is 

hereby ordered that the Motion is GRANTED and in camera treatment will be given to the 

exhibits identified in the Motion for the time period indicated therein. 

Dated: December __, 2013 

_____________________________

Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge