alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Andrea Billy SWIFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 78-490, 78-491 and 78-492 Consolidated.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 27, 1978.

*724Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bar-tow, and Karal B. Rushing, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

BOARDMAN, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in revoking his probation and in sentencing him to a total of eleven years in prison. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Appellant pled guilty to three separate charges: leaving the scene of an accident involving an injury, forgery, and uttering a forged instrument. On December 2, 1976 the trial court placed him on three concurrent five-year terms of probation. Subsequently the court revoked his probation for violations of the conditions of probation allegedly committed by appellant on December 21, 1977 and January 11, 1978. Appellant was sentenced to a one-year term of imprisonment for leaving the scene of an accident, a five-year term for forgery, and a five-year term for uttering a forged instrument. This appeal timely followed.

Two established and accepted principles of law control this case. The first is that a term of probation cannot exceed the maximum sentence which a court may impose. *Watts v. State,*328 So.2d 223 (Fla.2d DCA 1976). The other is that the court may only revoke probation for violations which occur during the term of that probation. *See generally Bouie v. State,*360 So.2d 1142 (Fla.2d DCA 1978); *Wrich v. State,*350 So.2d 1114 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).

Applying these propositions to the facts here we hold that the trial court erred in placing appellant on probation for five years for leaving the scene of an accident. The maximum punishment which the court could have imposed under Section 316.027 Florida Statutes (1975) for leaving the scene of an accident was one year. Consequently, the term of probation for that offense could not exceed one year, and appellant’s probation therefore ended on December 2, 1977. As a result, we believe the *725court erred in revoking appellant’s probation for leaving the scene of an accident since the violations which served as a basis for the revocation occurred after December 2, 1977.

We have considered the remaining point raised by appellant, but we need not discuss it for it is clearly refuted by the record.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgments and sentences for forgery and uttering a forged instrument and reverse the judgment and sentence for leaving the scene of an accident. We remand the case to allow the trial court to set aside the judgment and sentence for leaving the scene of an accident.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

SCHEB and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
#### Elmore B. NICHOLAS v. H. B. ZACHARY COMPANY.

No. 62545.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Elmore B. Nicholas, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Charles.

Writ denied.
**WINTHROP
      REALTY TRUST**


**FORM
      10-Q MARCH 31, 2008**


Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty Trust
      (“the
      Company”) for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael L. Ashner,
      Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
      adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




By:
            /s/
                Michael L. AshnerName:
            Michael
                L. AshnerChief
                Executive Officer





May
      9,
      2008
FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20580

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 

proceeding the appearance of

□ counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES)

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding,

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being filed.

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission

Room H-113

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Linda Kopp

 lkopp@ftc.gov

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Phone Number: 202-326-2267

Fax Number: 202-326-3062

Cambridge Analytica, LLC 8/7/2019 Maneesha Mithal D09383 (Linda Holleran Kopp)

08 07 2019

595501
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of Docket No.

STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING PURSUANT TO 16 C.F.R. § 4.1

Cambridge Analytica, LLC

D09383

Linda Kopp

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: 202-326-2267

Fax: 202-326-3062

Email: lkopp@ftc.gov

 In connection with the Notice of Appearance filed on August 07, 2019, and pursuant to 16 C.F.R. §

4.1 (d), I state that I am eligible to practice before the Commission as a member of the Bar of the District

of Columbia (Bar No. 472355). As requested by 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 (d), I further state that I am a member of

good standing within the legal profession.
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
  **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment Trust
        of
        New Jersey (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2006 (the
“Report”), I, Donald W. Barney, President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
        of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
        knowledge:
 (1)  the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d), and,
 (2)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
                  September 11, 2006
              /s/
                  Donald W. BarneyDonald
                  W. BarneyPresident,
                  Treasurer and Chief Financial
                  Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rahim
Rayani, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 19, 2008

                                           /s/ Rahim Rayani
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Rahim Rayani
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Chief Financial Officer
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 31, 2007 | By:    | /s/                Vincent L. Kasch    |
|-----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                              |   | Vincent                L. Kasch        |
|                              |   | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Cross-Respondents Cross-Petitioners
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                1,682,000
<SECURITIES>                          9,331,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              0
<PP&E>                               94,698,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      (16,018,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       95,689,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         0
<BONDS>                              70,600,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                             19,314,000
<OTHER-SE>                            1,534,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         95,689,000
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      8,418,000
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      4,023,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    2,379,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       2,016,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              7,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,009,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,009,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                              1.29



</TABLE>
#### Alfred J. BOULERICE, d/b/a Alfred J. Boulerice Roofing Company and National Indemnity Company, Petitioners, v. William BURNEO, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Eduardo Burneo and Eduardo Burneo, Individually, et al., Respondents.

No. 44228.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 20, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 280 So.2d 73.
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, and E. S. Nash, Appellants, v. Mildred C. BRADBURY, Appellee.

No. 72-283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 9, 1973.

Appealed dismissed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

July 13, 2020

Commenter Paul Risenhoover

Re: In the Matter of Williams-Sonoma, Inc., Docket No. C-4724

Dear Mr. Risenhoover:

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent 

agreement in the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment 

and placed it on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii).

In your comment, you discuss the legal status of Formosa, and state that, to the extent 

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. products are produced by “legal or natural person[s] arising from 

Formosa . . . the products are made ‘in America.’” You do not propose any revisions to the draft 

Complaint or Decision and Order. Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission

has determined that the relief set forth in the draft Decision and Order is appropriate and 

sufficient to remedy the violations alleged in the Complaint.

At this time, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served 

by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without modification. The final Decision and 

Order and other relevant materials are available on the Commission’s website at 

http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its 

work, and we thank you again for your comment.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Slaughter not participating.

April J. Tabor

Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1997
<CASH>                                           3,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (655)
<INVENTORY>                                     32,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,675
<PP&E>                                         115,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,436
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,622
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,932
<SALES>                                        161,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          120,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    407
<INCOME-TAX>                                       162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                245
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       245
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 115 (Thursday, June 14, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12736]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Request for Nominations for the Physician-Focused Payment Model 
Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC)

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Request for letters of nomination and resumes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 
established the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory 
Committee to provide comments and recommendations to the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services on physician payment models, and gave the 
Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. GAO is 
now accepting nominations of individuals for this committee.

DATES: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted no later 
than July 20, 2018, to ensure adequate opportunity for review and 
consideration of nominees prior to appointment. Appointments will be 
made in October 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit letters of nomination and resumes by either of the 
following methods: Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#075753464464686a6a6e737362624760666829606871"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cd9d998c8eaea2a0a0a4b9b9a8a88daaaca2e3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>. Include PTAC 
Nominations in the subject line of the message, or Mail: U.S. GAO, 
Attn: PTAC Nominations, 441 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20548.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Giusto at (202) 512-8268 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e49475b5d5a41496e494f4100494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2146485452554e466146404e0f464e57">[email protected]</span></a> if you do not receive an acknowledgement within a week 
of submission or if you need additional information. For general 
information, contact GAO's Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.

    Authority:  Pub. L. 114-10, Sec. 101(e), 129 Stat. 87, 115 
(2015).

Gene L. Dodaro,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2018-12736 Filed 6-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### JAN 15 1999 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

ELISEO C. DURAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 98-1356 JOSEPH R. GREENE, District Director of the 19th District of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service; IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, United States Department of Justice, Defendants-Appellees. (D.C. No. 97-N-1865) (Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before SEYMOUR , Chief Judge, BALDOCK , and HENRY , Circuit Judges. **
Plaintiff Eliseo C. Duran appeals from the district court’s judgment upholding a decision of the INS forfeiting an immigration bond upon which Plaintiff was the obligor. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, and carefully examined the entire record on appeal.2

Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants, and affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s recommendation on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, and the district judge’s subsequent order adopting that recommendation.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
FILED

August 27, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

ALAN D. HEAD, )

) C.C.A. NO. 01C01-9802-CR-00082

Appellant, ) (No. 95C-1699 Below)

)

VS. ) DAVIDSON COUNTY

) The Hon. Seth Norman

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) (Dismissal of Post-Conviction Petition)

Appellee. ) AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 20

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state's motion to affirm the judgment

of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Having reviewed

the petitioner’s brief, the state’s motion, and the entire record, we find that the state’s motion

is well taken. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20.

It appears that the petitioner was indicted on five counts of aggravated sexual

battery and on three counts of rape of a child. He subsequently pled guilty to three counts of

aggravated sexual battery. The petitioner contends that the indictment was fatally defective

and that the trial court was without jurisdiction to enter a plea of guilty. In his brief, the

petitioner concedes that our Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Hill, 974 S.W.2d 725 (Tenn.

1997), is contrary to his position, but he contends that the issue should be revisited. As an

intermediate appellate court, it is our duty to apply the law as promulgated by the legislature

or as announced by our Supreme Court. 

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the state’s motion to affirm the judgment

pursuant to Rule 20 is granted. The judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed. The

petitioner being indigent, costs of this appeal are taxed to the state.

________________________________

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_______________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, JUDGE

________________________________

DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE