alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2098200
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      61000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          442500
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        210900
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  215200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3027800
<COMMON>                                           400
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       769800
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             591500
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1361700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      22900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            661200
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      400
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  981600
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3027800
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       361000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             32000
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      246800
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      278800
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          82200
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (7600)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   74600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       (18500)
<NET-INCOME>                                     56100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        200
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    55900
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        28200
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          105800
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.36


</TABLE>
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),      and, |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      12, 2010 | /s/ Donald W. Barney                                  |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Donald      W. Barney                                 |
|                                 | President,      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                 |                                                  |
#### Gabriele Knecht, Appellant, v John V. Horrigan, Respondent.

[736 NYS2d 5]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), entered on or about March 29, 2001, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This action, seeking specific performance of an alleged contract to sell shares of stock in a cooperative corporation, was properly dismissed since there was no binding contract between the parties, plaintiff having unilaterally altered the contract sent her by defendant to provide that she was the only purchaser, when, in fact, the contract, as drafted by defendant’s counsel, provided, in accordance with defendant’s wishes, that his shares were to be sold in equal parts to both plaintiff and a second purchaser *(see, Matter of Express Indus. & Term. Corp. v New York State Dept. of Transp.,*93 NY2d 584, 589-590).

*223We have reviewed plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
United States of America 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Washington, DC 20580 

Bureau of Consumer Protection 

Division of Advertising Practices 

Andrea C. Levine, Esq. 

Senior Vice President, Director 

National Advertising Division 

112 Madison Avenue, 3rd Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

February 23, 2016 

Re: NAD Referral of Advertising Claims for Hefty Slider Bags 

Dear Ms. Levine: 

In December 2015, you referred to the FTC a series of advertising claims made by Reynolds 

Consumer Products, comparing Reynolds's Hefty Slider bags with Ziploc plastic bags. The 

referral followed an initial NAD decision in 2012 and four compliance proceedings, the last 

occurring in November 2015. In its initial decision, NAD held that Hefty did not have 

substantiation to support a "2x Stronger Seal" claim, but did have a reasonable basis-lab 

testing- for a "stronger seal" claim relating to certain situations, i. e., when the bags are shaken, 

dropped, or stacked. In the 2015 compliance proceedings, NAD found that subsequent Hefty 

advertising contained visual imagery that did not reflect the NAD-approved claim. In particular, 

NAD found that the imagery used in Hefty's ads made it appear, incorrectly, that Ziploc bags 

were liable to break open during ordinary use. After the fourth such compliance proceeding, 

NAD referred the matter to the FTC. 

The FTC fully supports the NAD's self-regulatory process, and staff shares NAD's concern 

that Hefty continued to make advertising claims that NAD deemed non-compliant with its 

decisions. After careful review of the NAD record, additional internal marketing directives, and 

meeting with the advertiser, we have detennined not to take additional action at this time. Our 

examination led us to conclude that the various changes Hefty made to its advertising reflected a 

good faith, even if incorrect, understanding of what the NAD decisions allowed it to say and 

show. Moreover, Reynolds has informed us that Hefty has ceased all comparative advertising 

between its bags and Ziploc's, and does not plan to resume any of the disputed claims in the 

future. Accordingly, it appears that no additional FTC action is warranted at the time. The 

Commission reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. 

Very truly yours, 

~~·~~ Associate Director for Advertising Practices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             ----------------------


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

                                       to

                                    FORM 10-Q

                     FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 2003

                QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                             ----------------------


                   CONTINENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
              ----------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


EXHIBIT                            DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
-------  ------------------------------------------------------------------

 99.1    Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to
         Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



<PAGE>


                   CONTINENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                     10-Q - Quarter Ended February 28, 2003

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, JONAH M. MEER, certify that:

      The Form 10-Q of CONTINENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION for the
      period ended February 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CONTINENTAL
      INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION for the periods presented.

This certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by CONTINENTAL INFORMATION
SYSTEMS CORPORATION for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


Date:  April 11, 2003               By:      /s/ Jonah M. Meer
                                             ----------------------------------
                                    Name:    Jonah M. Meer
                                    Titles:  Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                             Financial Officer, Chief Operating
                                             Officer and Director
#### Tina Louise GREGG v. Gary Gene GREGG.

No. 47178.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 21, 1973.

V. Douglas Gunter, Jackson, for appellant.

Binder, Lucas, Tharpe *&*Lohrmann, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County; W. T. Horton, Chancellor.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and INZER, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                           FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Stuart
I. Greenwald, Treasurer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Stuart I. Greenwald
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Stuart I. Greenwald
                                            Treasurer

                                            October 11, 2002


                                       15
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 12.    STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS


                      First Hawaiian, Inc. and Subsidiaries
         Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                    -------------------------------
                                                        1998                1997
                                                    ------------        -----------
                                                         (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                 <C>                 <C>        
Income before income taxes                          $     33,152        $    29,606
                                                    ------------        -----------


Fixed charges:(1)
  Interest expense                                        65,745             62,881
  Rental expense                                           2,740              2,767
                                                    ------------        -----------
                                                          68,485             65,648
Less interest on deposits                                 51,033             47,207
                                                    ------------        -----------

    Net fixed charges                                     17,452             18,441
                                                    ------------        -----------

    Earnings, excluding
      interest on deposits                          $     50,604        $    48,047
                                                    ============        ===========

    Earnings, including
      interest on deposits                          $    101,637        $    95,254
                                                    ============        ===========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

  Excluding interest on deposits                            2.90X              2.61x

  Including interest on deposits                            1.48X              1.45x
</TABLE>



(1)For purposes of computing the consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed
   charges, earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges.
   Fixed charges, excluding interest on deposits, include interest (other than
   on deposits), whether expensed or capitalized, and that portion of rental
   expense (generally one third) deemed representative of the interest factor.
   Fixed charges, including interest on deposits, consist of the foregoing items
   plus interest on deposits.
EXHIBIT 32.1

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FirstHartford Corporation (the ACompany@) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I Neil H.Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 
    -  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
    -  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

 

              /s/ Neil H. Ellis               

NeilH. Ellis

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

  

Date:December 19, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              65
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      690
<ALLOWANCES>                                        60
<INVENTORY>                                        974
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2326
<PP&E>                                            2960
<DEPRECIATION>                                     497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,771
<BONDS>                                          3,251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         42
<COMMON>                                           352
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,139
<SALES>                                          1,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,584
<CGS>                                            1,143
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     7
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  68
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    113
<INCOME-TAX>                                        43
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 70
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        70
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .91


</TABLE>
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 29, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00739

- CR

Andres R. CISNEROS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial D istrict Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR0183

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Time is

extended to May 30, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Aircraft Supported Battery DJI 5200mAh LiPo Battery Weight (Battery & Propellers included) 1242g Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly) Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m Max Yaw Angular Velocity 200°/s Max Tiltable Angle 35° Max Ascent / Descent Speed Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s Max Flight Speed 15m/s (Not Recommended) Diagonal motor-motor distance 350mm

Gimbal Working Current

Static : 750mA; Dynamic : 900mA Control Accuracy ±0.03° Controllable Range Pitch : -90°

-0° Maximum Angular Speed Pitch : 90°/s Camera Operating Environment Temperature

0 -40 °C °C Sensor size 1/2.3"Effective Pixels 14 Megapixels Resolution 4384×3288 HD Recording 1080p30 & 720p Recording FOV 110° / 85°

Remote Control Operating Frequency

5.728 GHz

- 5.85 GHz Communication Distance (open area) CE Compliance: 400m; FCC Compliance: 800m Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER) -93dBm Transmitter Power CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW Working Voltage 120 mA@3.7V Built-in LiPo Battery Working Current/Capacity 3.7V, 2000mAh

Range Extender Operating Frequency

2412-2462MHz Communication Distance (open area) 500-700m Transmitter Power 20dBm Power Consumption 2W DJI VISION System Requirement Of Mobile DeviceApp iOS version 6.1 or above/ Android system version 4.0 or above Mobile Device Support
• iOS recommended: iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPod touch 5 (available but not recommended: iPad 3, iPad 4, iPad mini)
• Android recommended: Samsung Galaxy S3, S4, Note 2, Note 3 or phones of similar configuration
#### Edna Truett JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. TOWN OF LAKE PARK, County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 2597.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

July 31, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### Robert F. BAILEY, Appellant, v. FORT LAUDERDALE BOARD OF REALTORS, INC., a nonprofit Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-84.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 28, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy (DoN) announces the availability of the inventions listed below, assigned to the United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Navy, for domestic and foreign licensing by the Department of the Navy.

# ADDRESSES:

Requests for copies of the patents cited should be directed to Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, Email                         *Christopher.Monsey@navy.mil,*                         812-854-2777.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following patents are available for licensing: Patent No. 9,958,544 (Navy Case No. 200113): VESSEL-TOWED MULTIPLE SENSOR SYSTEMS AND RELATED METHODS//and Patent No. 9,959,430 (Navy Case No. 103079): COUNTERFEIT MICROELECTRONICS DETECTION BASED ON CAPACITIVE AND INDUCTIVE SIGNATURES.

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: June 7, 2018.

E.K. Baldini,

Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2018-12834 Filed 6-14-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P