[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26410-26412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2017-0073]


Bayer CropScience LP; Availability of a Preliminary Plant Pest 
Risk Assessment, Draft Environmental Assessment, Preliminary Finding of 
No Significant Impact, and Preliminary Determination of Nonregulated 
Status for Cotton Genetically Engineered For Resistance to HPPD-
Inhibitor Herbicides (e.g., Isoxaflutole) and Glyphosate

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 26411]]

SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health 
Inspection Service has prepared a preliminary determination regarding a 
request from Bayer CropScience LP seeking a determination of 
nonregulated status for cotton designated as event GHB811, which has 
been genetically engineered for dual resistance to HPPD-inhibitor 
herbicides (e.g., isoxaflutole) and the herbicide glyphosate. We are 
also making available for public review and comment our preliminary 
plant pest risk assessment, draft environmental assessment, and 
preliminary finding of no significant impact for the preliminary 
determination of nonregulated status.

DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before July 
9, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2017-0073.
    <bullet> Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to 
Docket No. APHIS-2017-0073, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, 
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
    The draft environmental assessment, preliminary regulatory 
determination, preliminary finding of no significant impact, 
preliminary plant pest risk assessment, and any comments we receive on 
this docket may be viewed at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2017-0073 or in our reading room, which is 
located in room 1141 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and 
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure 
someone is there to help you, please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
    Supporting documents for this petition are also available on the 
APHIS website at http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/petitions_table_pending.shtml under APHIS Petition Number 17-138-01p.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. John Turner, Director, 
Environmental Risk Analysis Programs, Biotechnology Regulatory 
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 147, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; 
(301) 851-3954, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7ada8afa9e9b3e9b3b2b5a9a2b587a6b7afaeb4e9b2b4a3a6e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="42282d2a2c6c366c3637302c27300223322a2b316c373126236c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>. To obtain copies 
of the petition, contact Ms. Cindy Eck at (301) 851-3892, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b0aabda7bbbab2fdb2fdb6b0b893b2a3bbbaa0fda6a0b7b2fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7c4dec9d3cfcec689c689c2c4cce7c6d7cfced489d2d4c3c689c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Under the authority of the plant pest provisions of the Plant 
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the regulations in 7 CFR part 
340, ``Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced 
Through Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is 
Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,'' regulate, among other things, the 
introduction (importation, interstate movement, or release into the 
environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through 
genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to 
believe are plant pests. Such genetically engineered (GE) organisms and 
products are considered ``regulated articles.''
    The regulations in Sec.  340.6(a) provide that any person may 
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated 
under 7 CFR part 340. APHIS received a petition (APHIS Petition Number 
17-138-01p) from Bayer CropScience LP (Bayer) of Research Triangle 
Park, NC, seeking a determination of nonregulated status of cotton 
(Gossypium spp.) designated as event GHB811, which has been genetically 
engineered for dual resistance to HPPD-inhibitor herbicides (e.g., 
isoxaflutole) and the herbicide glyphosate. The Bayer petition states 
that information collected during field trials and laboratory analyses 
indicates that GHB811 cotton is not likely to be a plant pest and 
therefore should not be a regulated article under APHIS' regulations in 
7 CFR part 340.
    According to our process \1\ for soliciting public comment when 
considering petitions for determinations of nonregulated status of GE 
organisms, APHIS accepts written comments regarding a petition once 
APHIS deems it complete. In a notice \2\ published in the Federal 
Register on October 27, 2017 (82 FR 49782-49783, Docket No. APHIS-2017-
0073), APHIS announced the availability of the Bayer petition for 
public comment. APHIS solicited comments on the petition for 60 days 
ending on December 26, 2017, in order to help identify potential 
environmental and interrelated economic issues and impacts that APHIS 
may determine should be considered in our evaluation of the petition. 
APHIS received eight comments on the petition. One submission was in 
favor of the GHB811 cotton determination. Seven of the comments 
expressed a general disapproval of the planting and use of GE crops. Of 
the seven comments in opposition, two submissions contained attached 
comments by organizations. APHIS has evaluated the issues raised during 
the comment period and, where appropriate, has provided a discussion of 
these issues in our draft environmental assessment (EA).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the Federal Register 
(77 FR 13258-13260, Docket No. APHIS-2011-0129) a notice describing 
our public review process for soliciting public comments and 
information when considering petitions for determinations of 
nonregulated status for GE organisms. To view the notice, go to 
http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2011-0129.
    \2\ To view the notice, the petition, and the comments we 
received, go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-
2017-0073.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After public comments are received on a completed petition, APHIS 
evaluates those comments and then provides a second opportunity for 
public involvement in our decisionmaking process. According to our 
public review process (see footnote 1), the second opportunity for 
public involvement follows one of two approaches, as described below.
    If APHIS decides, based on its review of the petition and its 
evaluation and analysis of comments received during the 60-day public 
comment period on the petition, that the petition involves a GE 
organism that raises no substantive new issues, APHIS will follow 
Approach 1 for public involvement. Under Approach 1, APHIS announces in 
the Federal Register the availability of APHIS' preliminary regulatory 
determination along with its draft EA, preliminary finding of no 
significant impact (FONSI), and its preliminary plant pest risk 
assessment (PPRA) for a 30-day public review period. APHIS will 
evaluate any information received related to the petition and its 
supporting documents during the 30-day public review period. For this 
petition, we are using Approach 1.
    Had APHIS decided, based on its review of the petition and its 
evaluation and analysis of comments received during the 60-day public 
comment period on the petition, that the petition involves a GE 
organism that raises substantive new issues, APHIS would follow 
Approach 2. Under Approach 2, APHIS first solicits written comments 
from the public on a draft EA and preliminary PPRA for a 30-day comment 
period through the publication of a Federal Register notice. Then, 
after reviewing and evaluating the comments on the draft EA and 
preliminary PPRA and other information, APHIS would revise the 
preliminary PPRA as necessary and prepare a final EA and, based on the 
final EA, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decision document 
(either a FONSI or a notice of intent to prepare an environmental 
impact statement).

[[Page 26412]]

    As part of our decisionmaking process regarding a GE organism's 
regulatory status, APHIS prepares a PPRA to assess the plant pest risk 
of the article. APHIS also prepares the appropriate environmental 
documentation--either an EA or an environmental impact statement--in 
accordance with NEPA, to provide the Agency and the public with a 
review and analysis of any potential environmental impacts that may 
result if the petition request is approved.
    APHIS has prepared a preliminary PPRA and has concluded that cotton 
designated as event GHB811, which has been genetically engineered for 
dual herbicides resistance, is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk. In 
section 403 of the Plant Protection Act, ``plant pest'' is defined as 
any living stage of any of the following that can directly or 
indirectly injure, cause damage to, or cause disease in any plant or 
plant product: A protozoan, a nonhuman animal, a parasitic plant, a 
bacterium, a fungus, a virus or viroid, an infectious agent or other 
pathogen, or any article similar to or allied with any of the 
foregoing.
    APHIS has also prepared a draft EA in which we present two 
alternatives based on our analysis of data submitted by Bayer, a review 
of other scientific data, field tests conducted under APHIS oversight, 
and comments received on the petition. APHIS is considering the 
following alternatives: (1) Take no action, i.e., APHIS would not 
change the regulatory status of cotton designated as event GHB811, or 
(2) make a determination of nonregulated status of cotton designated as 
event GHB811.
    The draft EA was prepared in accordance with (1) NEPA, as amended 
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on 
Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of 
NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA 
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR 
part 372). Based on our draft EA and other pertinent scientific data, 
APHIS has prepared a preliminary FONSI with regard to the preferred 
alternative identified in the draft EA.
    Based on APHIS' analysis of field and laboratory data submitted by 
Bayer, references provided in the petition, peer-reviewed publications, 
information analyzed in the draft EA, the preliminary PPRA, comments 
provided by the public on the petition, and discussion of issues in the 
draft EA, APHIS has determined that cotton designated as event GHB811 
is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk. We have therefore reached a 
decision to make a preliminary determination of nonregulated status of 
cotton designated as event GHB811, whereby cotton designated as event 
GHB811 would no longer be subject to our regulations governing the 
introduction of certain GE organisms.
    We are making available for a 30-day review period APHIS' 
preliminary regulatory determination of cotton designated as event 
GHB811, along with our preliminary PPRA, draft EA, and preliminary 
FONSI for the preliminary determination of nonregulated status. The 
draft EA, preliminary FONSI, preliminary PPRA, and our preliminary 
determination for cotton designated as event GHB811, as well as the 
Bayer petition and the comments received on the petition, are available 
as indicated under ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above. 
Copies of these documents may also be obtained from the person listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    After the 30-day review period closes, APHIS will review and 
evaluate any information received during the 30-day review period. If, 
after evaluating the information received, APHIS determines that we 
have not received substantive new information that would warrant APHIS 
altering our preliminary regulatory determination or preliminary FONSI, 
substantially changing the proposed action identified in the draft EA, 
or substantially changing the analysis of impacts in the draft EA, 
APHIS will notify the public through an announcement on our website of 
our final regulatory determination. If, however, APHIS determines that 
we have received substantive new information that would warrant APHIS 
altering our preliminary regulatory determination or preliminary FONSI, 
substantially changing the proposed action identified in the draft EA, 
or substantially changing the analysis of impacts in the draft EA, then 
APHIS will conduct the additional analysis and prepare an amended EA, a 
new FONSI, and/or a revised PPRA, which would be made available for 
public review in a subsequent notice in the Federal Register, similar 
to an Approach 2 petition. APHIS will also notify the petitioner.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 1st day of June 2018.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-12187 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>