alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)August 5, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)August 5, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




The information disclosed in these Items 2.02 and 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.





Item 2.02Results of Operations and Financial ConditionOn August 5, 2014, we announced our results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2014.  The news release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein.Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn August 5, 2014, we reaffirmed our 2014 financial guidance.  The news release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated by reference herein.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated August 5, 2014.


2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:August 5, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1(d)News release issued by ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated August 5, 2014.











4
## **Exhibit 32.1**

## ** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection withthe Annual Report of Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cary T. Fu, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   | By:                     | /s/ Cary T. Fu |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|----------------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Cary T. Fu              |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |   |   | February 27, 2008  |

 

----
Order filed November 10, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00714-CV

____________

JOHN SMITH, Appellant

V.

KERVARA WILLIAMS INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F D.S., MINOR, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-49535

ORDER

The notice of appeal in this case was filed October 3, 2022. The clerk 

responsible for preparing the record notified this court that appellant has not made 

payment for the record. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has 

been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. On October 19, 2022, this court notified 

appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant filed a response 
with proof of payment for the record. No response was filed. Therefore, the court 

issues the following order.

Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court within ten (10) days of the 

date of this order arrangements have been made to pay for the clerk’s record. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If appellant fails to do so, the appeal is subject to dismissal 

without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Lina M. Khan, Chair 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter 

Christine S. Wilson 

In the Matter of 

Docket No. C-4316 

TWITTER, Inc., 

a corporation. 

DECISION 

The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) issued a Decision and Order against 

Twitter, Inc. (“Twitter) in Docket C-4316 on March 2, 2011 (“2011 order”).1 On May 25, 2022, 

the United States of America, acting upon notification and authorization to the Attorney General 

by the Commission, filed a complaint (“2022 complaint”) in federal district court alleging that 

Twitter violated the 2011 order by misrepresenting the extent to which it maintained and protected 

the privacy of nonpublic consumer information. The complaint also alleged that Twitter violated 

Section 5 of the FTC Act by misrepresenting how it would use telephone numbers and email 

addresses that users provided to enable a security feature. 

On May 26, 2022, Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson in the District for the Northern 

District of California entered a Stipulated Order for Civil Penalty, Monetary Judgment, and 

Injunctive Relief (“Stipulated Order”) resolving the 2022 complaint. In Section II of the 

Stipulated Order, Twitter consented to: (1) reopening the 2011 proceeding in FTC Docket No. C4316; (2) waiving its rights under the show cause procedures set forth in Section 3.72(b) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.72(b); and (3) modifying the 2011 Order with the 

new Decision and Order set forth below. 

In view of the foregoing, the Commission has determined that it is in the public interest to 

reopen the proceeding in Docket No. C-4316 pursuant to Commission Rule 3.72(b), 16 C.F.R. 

§ 3.72(b), and to issue a new order as set forth below. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that this matter be, and it hereby is, reopened; and 

1 In the Matter of Twitter, Inc., C-4316, 151 FTC LEXIS 162 (F.T.C. March 2, 2011). 

1 
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, Twitter having consented to modifying the 2011 

order as set forth below, the Commission hereby modifies the 2011 order with the attached 

Decision and Order. 

By the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Secretary 

SEAL: 

ISSUED: May 26, 2022 

2
EXHIBIT 10.70
May 4, 2001

To:   Pat Kane

From: John F Fuini

CC:   Berry Sugden
      Interim Capital
      Paul Barr
      Jon Robertson

John Fuini called a meeting in response to Pat Kane's letter dated 3/9/01. In
attendance were Pat Kane, Berry Sugden, Paul Barr, Jon Robertson and John F.
Fuini

A summary of Pat's request is:

1  Interim Capital is to hold at a standstill for a 90-day period on all of ADC
   indebtedness to Interim Capital.

2  Interim Capital will purchase all new invoices at 70% advance to ADC and the
   remaining balance of the invoices less fees when collected. When the schedule
   is closed, the balance shall be forwarded to ADC.

3  This rate will replace the previous arrangement of 50 % advance on the front
   end and the 50% remaining less fees to be applied to the old invoices.

4  Review this request in 90 days.

In light of the fact that ADC's indebtedness to Interim Capital is $1.7 Million
with $1.0 million in very old invoices, Interim Capital has agreed to this 90-
day window provided Interim Capital's following request is granted. That is:

1  John Fuini is placed in control of all of ADC's cash.

2  That he will manage the daily operations of the business as temporary acting
   C.E.O. or General Manager.

3  That he will continue in this capacity until ADC stock is trading or until
   Interim Capital is paid in full. This is his decision unless the Board should
   decide otherwise.

4  That a small auto for transportation and gas expenses be provided.

5  That he is paid $500 per week which will be accrued on ADC's books, provided
   that he is able to draw one week's pay each month ($500) toward his living
   expenses.

6  A statement of Condition of ADC as of 3/31/01, amended to 5/1/01 was
   requested. It was agreed to be issued by Barry Sudgen.

7  Pat Kane was in complete agreement with this arrangement.

JFF

Note: I requested Pat to advise the Board of Directors of this agreement.
On~nnu R l ,~ t4 " ~ "'" " ')', rì í1 ïl il ~~ ~ a ï \~/~ ti ~ t~it1~~Jl 

,.' 

)". -:....'.....,'..­ ",-"- '-,'" ',' , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

-?.li t 9:(
 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES , J (;
 5''fÓl)3 ó 

-',.' '''r-t, ,~" 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

POL YlORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) Docket No. 9327 

Respondent. ) 

) 

ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF RESPONDENT AND ENERSYS
 

TO CONDUCT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

On Januar 14,2009, Respondent and non-par EnerSys fied ajoint motion for an order 

allowing Respondent to depose employees of non-par EnerSys after the discovery deadline of 

Februar 13, 2009. The filing paries did not indicate Complaint Counsel's position. 

By Order dated Januar 15,2009, Respondent was advised that the motion would not be 

considered until Respondent fied a certificate of conference with Complaint Counsel on the 

motion, as required by Paragraph 5 of the Scheduling Order. Respondent was ordered to file a 

certificate of conference with Complaint Counsel on that motion by 4:00 p.m., Januar 16,2009. 

Subsequent to the Januar 15,2009 Order, Complaint Counsel, on Januar 15,2009, 

filed its response to the joint motion. In its response, Complaint Counsel states that it does not 

oppose the joint motion, so long as other discovery deadlines and the trial are not delayed. The 

fiing of a certificate of conference is now moot. 

The Joint Motion of Respondent and EnerSys is GRATED.

ORDERED: ~1l ~1i
 

D. ichael Chappell
 

Administrative Law Judge 

Date: Januar 16,2009
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7529 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to permit electronic notification 

with respect to certain lease terminations by members of the uniformed 

services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2020 

Ms. HAALAND (for herself and Mr. WENSTRUP) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to permit 

electronic notification with respect to certain lease terminations by members of the uniformed services, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century SCRA 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7529 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELECTRONIC NOTIFICATION OF TERMINATION OF 

2 RESIDENTIAL OR MOTOR VEHICLE LEASES. 

3 Section 305(c)(2) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief 

4 Act (50 U.S.C. 3955(c)(2)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

6 the end; 

7 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

8 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(D) by electronic delivery to an email ad11 dress designated by the lessor (or the lessor’s 

12 grantee) or the lessor’s agent (or the agent’s 

13 grantee).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### GRENADA MUNICIPAL SEPARATE SCHOOL DISTRICT et al. v. Laura Ann SALLY.

No. 50350.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 24, 1978.

Brunini, Grantham, Grower & Hewes, Holmes S. Adams, Jackson, for appellants.

McTeer, Walls, Bailey & Buck, Charles Victor McTeer, Greenville, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

*1008AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR HEARING.

COFER, J., took no part.
Exhibit 32.1



BJ Services Company

5500 Northwest Central Drive

Houston, Texas 77092



December 14, 2005



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549-0405



|Re: | CEO/CFO Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of BJ Services Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.W. Stewart, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ J.W. Stewart                                                                            
|    |  | J. W. Stewart Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer December 14, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 8414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81

[PA034-4054b; FRL-5688-6]


Clean Air Act Promulgation of Extension of Attainment Date for 
the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley Moderate Ozone Nonattainment Area; 
Pennsylvania

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to extend the attainment date for the Pittsburgh-
Beaver County moderate ozone nonattainment area in Pennsylvania to 
November 15, 1997. This extension is based in part on monitored air 
quality readings for the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) 
for ozone during 1996. Accordingly, EPA proposes to update the table in 
40 CFR part 81 concerning attainment dates in the State of 
Pennsylvania. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule and accompanying technical support document. If no 
adverse comments are received in response to this proposed rule, no 
further activity is contemplated in relation to this rule. If EPA 
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and 
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final 
rule based on this proposed rule.
    EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any 
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this 
time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by March 27, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be mailed to Marcia L. Spink, Associate 
Director, Air Programs, Mailcode 3AT00, U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 
19107. Copies of the documents relevant to this action are available 
for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air, 
Radiation, and Toxics Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region III, 841 Chestnut Building, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107; 
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air 
Quality, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 
17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia L. Spink at (215) 566-2104, or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f5c5f46414401424e5d4c464e6f4a5f4e424e4643014a5f4e01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3447445d5a5f1a595546575d557451445559555d581a5144551a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action of the same title which is located in the Rules and 
Regulations Section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671.

    Dated: February 5, 1997.
W. Michael McCabe,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 97-4120 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### SOUTHERN STATES LAND COMPANY, Inc., Petitioner, v. Sumner KRAMER et ux. et al., Respondents.

No. 40478.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 27, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 534.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

BOYD, J., dissents.
258 La. 210

#### Mary Margaret McAULIFFE, Widow of William M. O’BRIEN, and William M. O’Brien, Jr. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, The Travelers Indemnity Company, John O. Evans, Jr. and The Monarch Insurance Company.

No. 51247.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 24, 1971.

In re: Mary Margaret McAuliffe, widow of William M. O’Brien and William M. O’Brien, Jr. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 243 So. 2d 352.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2022

No. 04-21-00087-CV

TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY and Post Oak Clean Green, 

Inc.,

Appellants

v.

GUADALUPE COUNTY GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-1245-CV-C

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Guadalupe County Groundwater Conservation District’s Second Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Appellee’s Motion for Rehearing is GRANTED.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of December, 2022.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
#### John M. CHAPPELL and Kate B. Chappell, his wife, Petitioners, v. Laura M. RUSHING, Respondent.

No. 39880.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 16, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and ADKINS, JJ., concur.
#### Abram JORDAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 1, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                 Catellus Development Corporation Subsidiaries
                 ---------------------------------------------


ANT II, LLC
ANT, LLC
BHC Residential, LLC
Bridgecourt Partners
Carlsbad Laurel Tree Apartments, LP
Catellus BHC, LLC
Catellus Camp Pendleton, LLC
Catellus Commercial Group, LLC
Catellus Construction Corporation
Catellus Elmendorf, LLC
Catellus Fiber Optics, LLC
Catellus Finance I, L.L.C.
Catellus Fort Carson, LLC
Catellus Commercial Development Corporation
 (formerly Catellus Management Corporation)
Catellus Management Corporation of Canada Ltd.
Catellus Residential Communities, Inc.
Catellus Residential Construction, Inc.
Catellus Residential Design Center, Inc.
Catellus Residential Group, Inc.
Catellus Residential Homes Corp. I
Catellus Residential Marbella Inc.
Catellus Residential Meadowlark, LLC
Catellus Residential Occan Ridge, Inc.
Catellus Residential Ridgemoor Homes, Inc.
Catellus Residential Ridgemoor, Inc.
Catellus Residential-Tustin II LLC
Catellus Residential-Vista Ladera L.L.C.
Catellus Residential Westchester, L.L.C.
Catellus RVL, Inc. (formerly RVL, Inc.)
Catellus Technologies Group (Fremont), LLC
Catellus Technologies Group (Mission Bay), LLC
Catellus Union Station, Inc.
Catellus Urban Construction, Inc.
 (Mixed Use Construction, Inc.; formerly Westada Corporation)
Catellus Urban Development Group, LLC
 (formerly Catellus Mixed Use Group, LLC)
Catellus Urban Development, LLC
Catellus Westminster Company, LLC
Catellus Westminster II, LLC
Cato REIT, Co. (formerly Seabridge Properties, Inc.)
CCG Ontario, LLC
Collinsville Property Corporation
CRG/Constructors L.P.
CRG/CDI Oxnard LLC
CTG Data Centers (Fremont), LLC
CTG Data Centers (Mission Bay), LLC
Cuatro Catellus, LP
Dallas International Ltd.
Desert Housing LLC
Design Center Services
East Baybridge Partners, LP
Folsom Associates LLC
Fort Hood Family Housing, LLC
GGF Holdings, LLC
GGF Property, LLC
Catellus Urban Development Corporation
 (formerly Gillman Property Corporation)
Golden Empire Investment Corporation
Harbor Drive Company
Hercules, LLC
Hercules Victoria, LLC
International Rivercenter
Mission Bay Transportation Management Association
New Orleans International Hotel
New Orleans Rivercenter
New Shrine Holdings, LLC
Pacific Design Center
Pacific Market Investment Company
Parkway Village LLC
Plato REIT, LLC
Riding-Catellus Golden Gate, LLC
Santa Fe Bayfront Venture
Santa Fe Towers Land Company
Sequoia Pacific Realco, L.P.
Serrano Associates LLC
SF Pacific Properties Inc.
Talega Associates, LLC
Talega Village LLC
The South Portal Company
Thornstripe, Inc.
Thunderdome Co.
Torrance Investment Company
Traer Creek LLC
Union Station Venture One Corporation
Union Station Partners
Vista Range, LLC