alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
D AN W EISS

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

, I NTERNATIONAL & R EGULATORY A FFAIRS ( 713 ) 324

- 6076

DAN

. WEISS @ COAIR

. COM

March 29, 2011

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Depar tment of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Notice of Continental and ANA

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2009

- 0344

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

Pursuant to the blanket statement of authorization granted to Continental and ANA by

Notice of Action taken dated January 19 , 2010 in the above

- referenced docket, Continental

hereby notifies the Department of the display of ANA’s “NH*” designator code on flights

operated by Continental between:

 Tokyo, Japan and Houston, Texas; and

 Tokyo, Japan and Newark, New Jersey.

The proposed code

- share services are fully consistent with the U.S.

- Japan Open Skies

Agreement. Continental and ANA intend to implement these services on or after May 1, 201 1.

Respectfully submitted,

D an W eiss

Managing Director, I nternational &

Regulatory Affairs

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. AND

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INCCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causing a copy to be sen t via email:

agoerlich@ggh

- airlaw.com

carl.nelson@aa.com

charters@evergreenairlines.com

dvaughan@kelleydrye.co m

howard_kass@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

mroller@rollerbauer.com msinick@ssd.com

nssparks@fedex.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

slachter@lachter

- clem ents.com

donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña

International Regulatory Advisor

March 29 , 2011
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 12. STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

                      First Hawaiian, Inc. and Subsidiaries
         Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             QUARTER ENDED             NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                              SEPTEMBER 30,               SEPTEMBER 30,
                                         ----------------------      ----------------------
                                           1998          1997          1998          1997 
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------
                                                       (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                      <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>     
Income before income taxes               $ 35,367      $ 32,552      $102,450      $ 95,050
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------
Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                        66,292        64,850       198,182       191,527
   Rental expense                           2,751         2,502         8,195         7,881
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------
                                           69,043        67,352       206,377       199,408
Less interest on deposits                  52,779        50,292       155,610       146,105
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------
   Net fixed charges                       16,264        17,060        50,767        53,303
                                         --------      --------      --------      --------

   Earnings, excluding
      interest on deposits               $ 51,631      $ 49,612      $153,217      $148,353
                                         ========      ========      ========      ========

   Earnings, including
      interest on deposits               $104,410      $ 99,904      $308,827      $294,458
                                         ========      ========      ========      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges:

   Excluding interest on deposits           3.17X         2.91x         3.02X         2.78x

   Including interest on deposits           1.51X         1.48x         1.50X         1.48x
</TABLE>

For purposes of computing the consolidated ratios of earnings to fixed charges,
earnings represent income before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges,
excluding interest on deposits, include interest (other than on deposits),
whether expensed or capitalized, and that portion of rental expense (generally
one third) deemed representative of the interest factor. Fixed charges,
including interest on deposits, consist of the foregoing items plus interest on
deposits.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 16, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 16, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0082. BERNADETTE BIVENS v. MICHELE SHELLIE LEE et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: STCV2000148 STCV1900234 STCV2000147
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6048

RICHARD WAYNE GAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, FCI Estill,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-94-945-9-20)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 3, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam.

Richard Wayne Gay, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. Appellant's case was

referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

(1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and

advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant

failed to timely object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice.

We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability to the extent

that one is required and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Cause No. DA 23-0504 Page 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Sean S. Frampton

FRAMPTON PURDY LAW FIRM

530 West 19th Street #301

Whitefish, MT 59937

Telephone: (406) 862-9600

E-mail: sean@framptonpurdy.com

Attorneys for Donald Slaybaugh

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Case No. DA 23-0504

D.A. DAVIDSON & CO,

 Plaintiff,

 -vsDONALD SLAYBAUGH on behalf 

and for the benefit of THE 

WHITEFISH MASONIC LODGE 64 

and GRAND LODGE OF AF&AM OF 

MONTANA,

 Defendants.

][

][

][

][

][

][

][

][

][

ORDER GRANTING 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE OPENING BRIEF

GRAND LODGE OF AF & AM OF 

MONTANA,

 Cross-Plaintiff,

-vsDONALD SLAYBAUGH, on behalf of 

and for the benefit of THE 

WHITEFISH LODGE 64,

 Cross-Defendant.

][

][

][

][

][

][

][

][

][

DONALD SLAYBAUGH, on behalf of 

and for the benefit of THE 

WHITEFISH LODGE 64,

 Cross-Claimant,

-vsGRAND LODGE OF AF & AM OF 

MONTANA,

 Cross-Defendant

][

][

][

][

][

][

][

11/17/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0504
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

Cause No. DA 23-0504 Page 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

The Court being in receipt of Appellants’ unopposed Motion for Extension 

of Time to File Opening Brief, and good cause appearing, NOW THEREFORE, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants shall have up to and including 

December 22, 2023, in which to file their Opening Brief.

DATED and electronically signed below.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 17 2023
## AD Grid Sheet
Docket No.:

# FAA-2013-**~?** Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-176-AD AD Action: Final rule after NPRM This action applies to all DASSAULT AVIATION Model FAN JET FALCON , FAN JET FALCON SERIES C , D, E , F , and G airplanes ; Model MYSTERE-FALCON 200 airplanes ; and Model MYSTERE-FALCON 20-C5 , 20-D5 , 20-E5 , and 20-F5 airplanes . CONCURRENCES OUT I NG SYMBOL

ATE 

## , -z- 1 v'L- /, ·"3 ROU TI NG S YM B OL ANM-114

If this draft is acceptable , please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial**E-::-:-===-~~~---­** and full last name to show concurrence with this AD .

S I GNATURE (F ir s t Initi al / L

as t Na m e) DATE RO UT I NG S YMBOL S I

GNATURE (F ir st In iti al / Las t Na m e) DA

T E OUT ING SYMBOL S I

GNATURE (Firs t Initi al/Last Na m e) DATE ROUTING SYMBOL S I

GNATURE (Fi r st Initi al / Las t Name) DA T E
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Real Estate Investment
Trust of New Jersey (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July
31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Robert S. Hekemian, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss. 78m(a) or 78o(d),
      and,

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date: September 14, 2004                          /s/ Robert S. Hekemian
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Robert S. Hekemian
                                                  Chairman of the Board and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
#### Susan M. MASCARA and John M. Mascara, Appellants, v. Ralph BAUMGARTNER et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1062.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 17, 1971.

Robert E. Stucker of Reasbeck & Fegers, Hollywood, for appellants.

Borden R. Hallowes of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee, Baumgart-ner.

John E. Donahoe of Burdick & Donahoe, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees, Friedly.

Dieter K. Gunther of Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees, Spechler.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument we are of the opinion that the appellants have failed to make error clearly appear. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is therefore affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., and SACK, MARTIN, Associate Judge, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                      15,792,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      78,445,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,744,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,653,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     60,262,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    19,314,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,765,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,653,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,614,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,550,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,466,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,598,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,589,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,589,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.66


</TABLE>
GHASSEMI, PHOEL & COMPANY
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
23 Langdon Place
Lynbrook, NY 11563
Phone:  516-887-4444
Fax:   516-887-4450






Board of Directors and Shareholders
Datatab, Inc.

The examination referred to in our opinion dated March 16, 1999 of the financial
statements as of December 31, 1998 and for each of the three years then ended
included the related supplemental financial schedules as listed in Item 11(a)2,
which, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements, presents
fairly in all material respects the information shown therein.









/S/ GHASSEMI, PHOEL & CO.
-------------------------
Certified Public Accountants


Lynbrook, New York
March 16, 1999






                                     IV - 4
MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATIONExhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Paul D. Tobias, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mackinac Financial Corporation, certifythat:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Mackinac Financial Corporation (the“registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 15, 2007  /s/ Paul D. Tobias   PAUL D. TOBIAS   CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,377,034
<SECURITIES>                                   297,623
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,307,187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,962,998
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,195,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,815,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,324,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,815,706
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,991,579
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,850,356
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                141,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            141,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   167,550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10Q for the quarter ending July 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Neil H.
Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ Neil H. Ellis
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Neil H. Ellis
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                           March 12, 2003



                                       15
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

The Healing Staff 

Under Contract No. FA7014-06-D-0003 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59411 

Adam M. Burton, Esq. 

Counsel 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Anna F. Kurtz, Esq. 

Michelle D. Coleman, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 6 April 2017 

MICHAEL T. PAUL 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59411, Appeal of The Healing Staff, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
No. 10594.

#### The K. D. Box & Label Co. *v.*Caine, by etc.

Decided March 31, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Ford, Snyder &*Tilden, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Walter C. Ong*and *Mr. D. N. Bader,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30563

LUTHER HUNT; ROBERT LECOMPT; LANDON ALEXANDER, JR.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

MICHAEL I. BERNSTEIN; ET AL.,

Defendants,

RICHARD WINGATE; BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(97-CV-1103)

September 13, 1999

Before POLITZ, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiffs-appellants appeal the dismissal of their action. Having considered the

briefs, oral arguments of counsel, and allrelevant matters of record considered by the district

court in determining the court’s jurisdiction in this matter, and finding no reversible error,

the rulings by the district court are AFFIRMED.