alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4861]



[[Page 9004]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Issuer Delisting; Notice of Application to Withdraw From Listing 
and Registration; (Eaton Vance Corp., Non-voting Common Stock, $0.625, 
Par Value) File No. 1-8100

February 21, 1997.
    Eaton Vance Corp. (``Company'') has filed an application with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to 
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') and Rule 
12d2-2(d) promulgated thereunder, to withdraw the above specified 
security (``Security'') from listing and registration on the Boston 
Stock Exchange, Inc. (``BSE'').
    The reasons alleged in the application for withdrawing the Security 
from listing and registration include the following:
    According to the Company, the non-voting common stock is listed on 
the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''), and an application on 
Form 8-A for registration of the Company's non-voting common stock on 
the NYSE was declared effective by the Commission on August 15, 1996. 
The Company does not see any particular advantage in the dual trading 
of its securities and believes that dual listing would fragment the 
market for its securities. Also, the Company cannot justify the expense 
of being listed on two exchanges and thereby, wishes to withdraw from 
the BSE.
    Any interested person may, on or before March 14, 1997, submit by 
letter to the Secretary of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 
Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549, facts bearing upon whether 
the application has been made in accordance with the rules of the 
exchanges and what terms, if any, should be imposed by the Commission 
for the protection of investors. The Commission, based on the 
information submitted to it, will issue an order granting the 
application after the date mentioned above, unless the Commission 
determines to order a hearing on the matter.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
pursuant to delegated authority.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4861 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 12.    STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS



                     First Hawaiian, Inc. and Subsidiaries
        Computation of Consolidated Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      QUARTER ENDED      NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                       SEPTEMBER 30,         SEPTEMBER 30,
                                    ------------------   -------------------
                                     1995       1994       1995       1994
                                    -------   --------   --------   --------
                                              (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                 <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before income taxes          $30,308   $ 30,344   $ 88,800   $ 88,482
                                    -------   --------   --------   --------

Fixed charges:(1)
   Interest expense                  65,026     44,649    201,095    125,170
   Rental expense                     1,122      2,980      3,628      8,968
                                    -------   --------   --------   --------
                                     66,148     47,629    204,723    134,138

Less interest on deposits            43,736     29,998    131,841     84,771
                                    -------   --------   --------   --------

   Net fixed charges                 22,412     17,631     72,882     49,367
                                    -------   --------   --------   --------

   Earnings, excluding
       interest on deposits         $52,720   $ 47,975   $161,682   $137,849
                                    =======   ========   ========   ========

   Earnings, including
       interest on deposits         $96,456   $ 77,973   $293,523   $222,620
                                    =======   ========   ========   ========

Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges:

   Excluding interest on deposits      2.35 x     2.72 x     2.22 x     2.79 x

   Including interest on deposits      1.46 x     1.64 x     1.43 x     1.66 x
</TABLE>


(1)    For purposes of computing the above ratios, earnings represent income
       before income taxes plus fixed charges.  Fixed charges, excluding
       interest on deposits, include interest (other than on deposits), whether
       expensed or capitalized, and that portion of rental expense (generally
       one third) deemed representative of the interest factor.  Fixed charges,
       including interest on deposits, include all interest, whether expensed
       or capitalized, and that portion of rental expense (generally one third)
       deemed representative of the interest factor.
Exhibit 11


                       ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS CORPORATION
               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE
               FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, 1996, AND 1995


PRIMARY:                                          1997        1996        1995
                                                  ----        ----        ----

Common shares outstanding ..................   6,923,688   6,879,699   6,846,099
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents:
   Stock options ...........................          --          --       7,970
                                               ---------   ---------   ---------
Weighted average number of shares ..........   6,923,688   6,879,699   6,854,069
                                               =========   =========   =========



FULLY DILUTED:

Common shares outstanding ..................   6,923,688   6,879,699   6,846,099
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents:
   Stock options ...........................          --          --      23,196
                                                ________    ________    ________

Weighted average number of shares ..........   6,923,688   6,879,699   6,869,295
                                               =========   =========   =========
#### Dan LANE, as father and next of kin of the Deceased minor child, Todd A. Lane, Appellant, v. ST. JOSEPH’S HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED, Appellee.

No. 73-357.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
From: Caitlin Johnson

Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 1:10 PM

To: jerry.allen@metglas.com; tballo@earthjustice.org; bermaneconomics@gmail.com;

greg.coulter405@gmail.com; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; gbf1@pge.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com;

rgreeson@federalpacific.com; jmauer@standardsasap.org; dave.millure@metglas.com;

snadel@aceee.org; wes.patterson@us.abb.com; eric.petersen@aksteel.com; srosenstock@eei.org;

rroy@nrdc.org; robert.saint@nreca.coop; jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; kwinder@mleainc.com;

jim.creevy@nema.org; Cla_Silcox@nema.org; jhodge@howard.com; daniel.cohen@hq.doe.gov;

raymond.polinski@atimetals.com; BLongstreth@nrdc.org; jhmpinc40@aol.com; wingy51@aol.com;

GJRosenquist@lbl.gov

Cc: Michael Rivest; Brian Coffey; Zhimei Luo; Matthew Nardotti; Richard Parker; Freeman, Jeremiah

(CONTR)

Subject: Distribution Transformers Stakeholder Meeting July 28, 2011

Distribution Transformers Stakeholder Meeting

July 28, 2011, 1:30 pm ‐ 5:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

1801 K Street NW

Suite 500

Capitol Hill Conference Room (next to receptionist)

Washington, DC 20006

Call

‐ in Number: 866

‐ 411

‐ 8313 (US and Canada)

702

‐ 599

‐ 4018 (International)

Conference code: 012 029 7324

AGENDA

This meeting is to update you on developments and discuss the process by which a negotiated

rulemaking for distribution transformers would proceed. We will focus on issues such as the scope and

timetable for negotiations, and, as time permits, overview key issues of concern to stakeholders and

priority areas that may require further supporting analysis. This is an informal meeting for discussion

purposes only. No consensus opinions or recommendations will be developed at this meeting. If this

process moves forward, a negotiating committee will be formed under the Negotiated Ruleamaking Act

to seek consensus on a proposed rule setting forth standards for each category of covered transformers.

1:30 Introductions; Overview of negotiated rulemaking process; status of rulemaking supporting

analysis2:30 Discussion of scope of rulemaking (e.g. whether to include low voltage dry

‐ type transformers),

process, timetable for decision

3:30 Break

3:45 Discussion of major issues and concerns to be addressed in rulemaking, supporting analysis needs

5:00 Adjourn

If you have not done so already, please RSVP to Navigant Consultant Caitlin Johnson at 1

‐ 914

‐ 815

‐

5234 or Caitlin.johnson@navigant.com

. Please indicate whether you will be attending in

‐ person or

calling in.

Caitlin Johnson | Consultant | Energy | Navigant

77 South Bedford Street | Suite 400 | Burlington, MA 01803

781.270.8398 Office | 781.270.0418 Fax

www.navigant.com

Visit our website for Expert Perspectives and Navigant Events

DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS • ECONOMICS • FINANCIAL ADVISORY • MANAGEMENT CONSULTING
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000419

17-JUN-2014

09:40 AM
#### Jon R. HENDRICHS, Appellant, v. Emmet SNYDER, Police Chief of Homestead, Appellee.

No. 73-62.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 17, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4323]



[[Page 8012]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5692-4]


Proposed Settlement Agreement; National Emission Standards for 
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) From Facilities That Manufacture 
Pharmaceutical Products

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act as 
amended (CA), 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed settlement agreement entered into by EPA and the Natural 
Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The proposed settlement agreement 
establishes a schedule for when EPA intends to take final action on the 
NESHAP for manufacturers of pharmaceutical products. The proposed 
settlement agreement accompanies revisions to a consent decree entered 
into by EPA and NRDC in establishing schedules for EPA's issuance, 
inter alia, of a number of effluent guidelines and standards under 
section 304(m) of the Clean Water Act (CA), including effluent 
guidelines for pharmaceutical manufacturers. EPA is agreeing to 
undertake the NESHAP rulemaking for the pharmaceutical manufacturers on 
the same schedule as the effluent guidelines for pharmaceutical 
manufacturers.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to 
the settlement from persons not party to the proposed settlement 
agreement. EPA or the Department of Justice may withhold or withdraw 
consent to the proposed settlement if the comments disclose facts or 
circumstances that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, 
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the CA.
    A copy of the proposed settlement agreement was filed with the 
clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia 
on January 31, 1997. Copies are also available from Phyllis Cochran, 
Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of General Counsel, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be sent to Karen H. 
Clark at the address above and must be submitted on or before March 24, 
1997.

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
Scott C. Fulton,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-4323 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     791,284,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      46,187,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            78,085,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            14,693,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              1,880,650,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   2,125,025,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     2,117,698,000
<LOANS>                                 13,032,238,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                178,435,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          18,731,424,000
<DEPOSITS>                              15,186,950,000
<SHORT-TERM>                             1,365,736,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        176,039,000
<LONG-TERM>                                447,959,000
<COMMON>                                    39,257,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,515,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          18,731,424,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            813,671,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          196,098,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            19,382,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         1,029,151,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         435,022,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         508,573,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      520,578,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               21,734,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             259,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            415,955,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            245,907,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 245,907,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               164,885,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.29
<LOANS-NON>                                 56,819,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                25,161,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             3,643,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           159,487,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               22,000,000
<RECOVERIES>                                13,078,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          178,435,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    178,435,000
        

</TABLE>
#### J. C. HASTY, Appellant, v. Frank GRANBERRY and his wife, Lulu Granberry, Appellees.

No. M-141.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U. S. C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual
        Report”) of Command Security Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended
        March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
        date
        hereof, I, Barry I. Regenstein, President and Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
        (d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
        The
        information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
        June 27, 2008
 
 By: /s/
        Barry I. Regenstein
 
 Barry
        I.
        Regenstein
 President
        and Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal
        Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                        FINANCIAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Financial  Industries  Corporation
("FIC") on Form 10- Q for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Eugene
E. Payne, Chief Executive Officer,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          FIC.





   /s/ Eugene E. Payne
_____________________________
Eugene E. Payne
Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 14, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,160,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                   0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,890,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,351,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                     0
<LOANS>                                        382,926,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,572,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 434,043,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     372,162,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,551,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,019,000
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,840,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        12,079,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,392,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 434,043,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,861,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  220,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   102,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,183,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,977,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,253,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,930,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      250,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  44,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,658,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,564,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,564,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,150,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        5.54
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,630,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,633,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                          0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,600,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      284,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         6,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,572,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,572,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,880,000
        


</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7500 

To limit further expansion of the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military 

Force, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2020 

Mr. BROWN of Maryland (for himself, Ms. SPANBERGER, Mr. COLE, Mr. 

BACON, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. WOODALL, Mr. CROW, Mr. ROONEY of Florida, and Mr. YOHO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To limit further expansion of the 2001 Authorization for 

Use of Military Force, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Limit on the Expan5 sion of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXPANSION OF THE 2001 AUTHOR7 IZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE. 

8 The Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public 

9 Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) may not be construed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7500 IH

1 to provide authorization for the use of force, including 

2 under section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution (50 

3 U.S.C. 1544(b)), in any country in which United States 

4 Armed Forces are not engaged in hostilities pursuant to 

5 such Authorization as of the date of the enactment of this 

6 Act. 

7 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

8 Nothing in this Act may be construed— 

9 (1) to deem the use of force in any country in 

10 which United States Armed Forces are engaged in 

11 hostilities as of the date of the enactment of this Act 

12 as lawful or unlawful pursuant to the Authorization 

13 for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 

14 U.S.C. 1541 note); or 

15 (2) as an authorization for use of military force. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Metropolitan Areas: Fraud and Other Reports,
,
Metropolitan Area,Reports per 100K Population
"Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",564.5
"Auburn-Opelika, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",549.1
"Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",599.2
"Columbus, GA-AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",721.6
"Daphne-Fairhope-Foley, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",573.9
"Decatur, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",444.6
"Dothan, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",486.4
"Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",480.4
"Gadsden, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",441.7
"Huntsville, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",583.3
"Mobile, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",571.3
"Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",668.9
"Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area",444.5
,
"Metropolitan Areas are defined by the Office of Management and Budget, and population estimates are based on 2016 U.S. Census figures. Metropolitan Areas are ranked based on the number of reports per 100,000 population.  Reports exclude state-specific data contributor reports.",
,
"Source: Consumer Sentinel Network Data Book 2018, Federal Trade Commission",