alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BARBA INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. William M. THORSEN, Appellee.

No. O-283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 15, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 9, 1971.

Adams & White, Pensacola, for appellant.

Catón & Catón, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD, A. C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### SHANDS & BAKER, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. HOLMES COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1971.

John D. Corse and Lyman T. Fletcher of Ulmer, Murchison, Ashby & Ball, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Stephen H. Grimes, of Holland & Knight, Bartow, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully studied the briefs of the respective parties and examined the record on appeal. The trial judge personally heard all of the testimony and entered the final judgment appealed. The record establishes that the final judgment is supported by competent substantial evidence and the appellant has failed to show reversible error.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES, and MANN, JJ., concur.
#### FAIRFAX BROADCASTING COMPANY, etc., Petitioner, v. Honorable Robert S. HEWITT, Circuit Judge, etc., Respondent.

No. 40378.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 26, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 888.

CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., and DREW (Retired), J., concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN and’ BOYD, JJ., dissent.
259 La. 807

#### Geneva BROWN, Widow of Robert Brown v. KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION.

No. 51678.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Bernard. 250 So.2d 99.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
261 La. 219

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Bobby D. GLOVER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 52244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 22, 1972.

In re: Bobby D. Glover applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Retained counsel at plea. See McGriff v. Wainwright, 431 F.2d 897 (5th Cir. 1970). Moreover, under the one issue of lack of knowledge of penal consequence of plea, the colloquy recorded at the plea negate that allegation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                             
                                                                   
<ARTICLE>      5
                                                                   
<S>                             <C>                                
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998     
<CASH>                                             39,656                                         
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,961,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                       60,000
<INVENTORY>                                     2,255,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,558,885
<PP&E>                                          4,260,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,602,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,417,317         
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,920,581
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         5,294
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,140,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    9,417,317
<SALES>                                         6,291,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,291,351
<CGS>                                           4,323,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,323,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,462,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                176,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (672,063)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (672,063)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.13)
                                                     
                                                     

</TABLE>
#### Mary E. STANDRIDGE, Appellant, v. James E. STANDRIDGE, Appellee.

No. 73-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

Certification requirements set forth in Section 302(a) ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

 

I, Neil H. Ellis, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofFirst Hartford Corporation.

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

----

 

 

 

 

 

 

# Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS

(continued)

      

(a)    All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: September 28, 2007

 

By:/s/ Neil H. Ellis              

      Neil H. Ellis

      President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                               JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           764,057
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,707,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                      30,000
<INVENTORY>                                   12,491,774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              24,163,738
<PP&E>                                        76,436,392
<DEPRECIATION>                                30,369,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               102,604,977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         18,744,599
<BONDS>                                       27,110,365
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                       1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                                    53,146,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 102,604,977
<SALES>                                        9,359,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              15,800,309
<CGS>                                          9,251,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,669,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               682,338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  197,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                     128,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (173,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (173,709)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.26)



</TABLE>
08 09 2019 

595554 

ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

In the Matter of 

Cambridge Analytica, LLC, 

Respondent. 

Docket No. 9383 

ORDER DESIGNATING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

Pursuant to authority vested in the Federal Trade Commission and delegated to 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

IT IS ORDERED that D. Michael Chappell, Chief Administrative Law Judge, be, 

and hereby is, designated and appointed to take testimony and receive evidence in this 

proceeding and to perform all other duties authorized by law. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michaelappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: August 9, 2019 
Notice of Electronic Service 

I hereby certify that on August 09, 2019, I filed an electronic copy of the foregoing Order Designating 

Administrative Law Judge, with: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Suite 110 

Washington, DC, 20580 

Donald Clark 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Suite 172 

Washington, DC, 20580 

I hereby certify that on August 09, 2019, I served via E-Service an electronic copy of the foregoing Order 

Designating Administrative Law Judge, upon: 

Linda Kopp 

Federal Trade Commission 

lkopp@ftc.gov 

Complaint 

Dana Gross 

Attorney
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly
period ended May 29, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), Howard R. Levine, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Kenneth T. Smith, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 7, 2010

| |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  | /s/ Howard R. Levine                             
| |  | Howard R. Levine                                 
| |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                    
| | 
| |  | /s/ Kenneth T. Smith                             
| |  | Kenneth T. Smith                                 
| |  | Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer  
| |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



28
#### George Bartley CORR and Francis Jerome Corr as Executors of the Estate of Francis J. Corr, Deceased, Appellants, v. MAC-LTD, INC., Appellee.

No. 71-661.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1973.

T. Paine Kelly, Jr., of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellants.

Peter J. Winders, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith & Cutler, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the voluminous record of this complex non-jury trial which involved a controversy arising out of a Holiday Inn motel lease. Both damages and reformation or cancellation were sought in a multi-count complaint, and cross charges for damages were brought in a multi-count countercomplaint. We are of the view that the trial judge copiously considered the evidence herein and applied the law without reversible error to the facts he properly found.

No reversible error appearing, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted December 8, 2009*

Decided December 10, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

RICHARD D. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 09-2494

AGWU NWOKE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

VILLAGE OF BOLINGBROOK,ILLINOIS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division.

No. 09 C 2764

Charles P. Kocoras, Judge.

Order

After receiving a ticket for running a red light, Agwu Nwoke filed this suit in federal 

court under 42 U.S.C. §1983. He accuses the Village of Bolingbrook of malicious prosecution on the theory that its police force issues tickets to raise revenue rather than to 

enforce the traffic laws.

The district court dismissed the suit in a curt order that does not provide reasons, 

and thus violates Circuit Rule 50. The suit may have been dismissed for failure to prosecute (Nwoke failed to appear at a scheduled hearing) or on the merits; if the latter, the 

district court’s reasons for thinking the complaint defective were not stated. But there 

would be no point to a remand, because the complaint is incurably deficient. There is no 

federal-law claim for malicious prosecution, if state law provides remedies for that tort 

(as Illinois does). See Newsome v. McCabe, 256 F.3d 747 (7th Cir. 2001). Other potential 

problems with Nwoke’s theory need not be explored.

AFFIRMED

 

* After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See 

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).
#### Theoplas PEARCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-495.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
---

CONSENT OF EXPERT

Gideon Johannes van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat. 
  P.O. Box 20
  Potchefstroom 
  South Africa 
  2520

US Securities and Exchange Commission

Re Great Basin Gold Ltd. Form on 20F for the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

I, Gideon Johannes van der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat hereby certify
  that I have read the disclosure in connection with the Burnstone Gold Project
  contained in the subject 20F and hereby consent to the reference to myself as
  a named expert in the written disclosure in the Form 20F of Great Basin Gold
  Ltd.

Dated this 29th day of June, 2005.

|Deon van
      der Heever, Pr.Sci.Nat.          
|------------------------------------------------
|GeoLogix Mineral Resource Consultants (Pty) Ltd.

---
#### Bobby HOLMES v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute.

No. 62163.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Bobby Holmes, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans.

*955Granted; an evidentiary hearing is ordered on this application.
Case 6:16-cv-00982-CEM-TBS Document 274 Filed 04/23/19 Page 1 of 2 PageID 6350 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

ORLANDO DIVISION 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY 

GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, 

DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

LIFE MANAGEMENT SERVICES OF 

ORANGE COUNTY, LLC, LOYAL 

FINANCIAL & CREDIT SERVICES, 

LLC, IVD RECOVERY, LLC, KWP 

SERVICES, LLC, KWP SERVICES OF 

FLORIDA LLC, LPSOFFLA LLC, 

LPSOFFLORIDA L.L.C., PW&F 

CONSULTANTS OF FLORIDA LLC, 

UAD SECURE SERVICES LLC, UAD 

SECURE SERVICE OF FL LLC, URB 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, YCC 

SOLUTIONS LLC, YFP SOLUTIONS 

LLC, KEVIN W. GUICE, CHASE P. 

JACKOWSKI, LINDA N. MCNEALY, 

CLARENCE H. WAHL, KAREN M. 

WAHL, ROBERT GUICE and 

TIMOTHY WOODS, 

Case No: 6:16-cv-982-Orl-41TBS 

Defendants. 

/ 

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Status Report and Notice of Filing Thirteen 

Proposed Stipulated Orders (Doc. 185). For the reasons stated therein, and for the reasons stated 

in the Proposed Stipulated Orders (Doc. Nos. 185-1–185-13), it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED 

as follows: 

Page 1 of 2 
 

 

 

 

Case 6:16-cv-00982-CEM-TBS Document 274 Filed 04/23/19 Page 2 of 2 PageID 6351 

1. The Proposed Stipulated Orders (Doc. Nos. 185-1–185-13) are ADOPTED and 

made a part of this Order. 

2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants 

Chase P. Jackowski, Linda N. McNealy, Clarence H. Wahl, Karen M. Wahl, Life 

Management Services of Orange County, LLC, Loyal Financial & Credit Services, 

LLC, IVD Recovery, LLC, KWP Services, LLC, KWP Services of Florida LLC, 

LPSOFFLA LLC, LPSOFFLORIDA L.L.C., PW&F Consultants of Florida LLC, 

UAD Secure Services LLC, UAD Secure Service of FL LLC, URB Management, 

LLC, YCC Solutions LLC, YFP Solutions LLC, Robert Guice and Timothy Woods 

in the amount of $23,099,878 jointly and severally. 

3. The Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of construction, 

modification, and enforcement of this Order. 

DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on April 23, 2019. 

Copies furnished to: 

Counsel of Record 

Unrepresented Parties 

Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,288
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              97
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,992
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     12,961
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        359,530
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,546
<DEPOSITS>                                     364,150
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,551
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,724
<LONG-TERM>                                     11,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,165
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,074
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 421,546
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,571
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  823
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   237
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                26,631
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,712
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,643
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,988
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      878
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (17)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,226
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,226
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,305
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.39
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.01
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,369
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,116
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,591
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      370
<RECOVERIES>                                        97
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,494
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,681
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,813
        

</TABLE>