alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-65077) of Cell Genesys, Inc. 2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-71608) of Cell Genesys, Inc. 3) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-102122) of Cell Genesys, Inc. 4) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-121732) of Cell Genesys, Inc. 5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-07707) pertaining to the 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 1992Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Cell Genesys, Inc. 6) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59633) pertaining to the 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Cell Genesys,Inc. 7) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42644) pertaining to the 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 1992Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Cell Genesys, Inc. 8) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54376) pertaining to the 2001 Nonstatutory Option Plan of Cell Genesys, Inc. 9) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-63398) pertaining to the 2001 Director Option Plan of Cell Genesys, Inc. 10) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-71606) pertaining to the Calydon, Inc. Management Incentive and RetentionPlan, as amended 125 11) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-91796) pertaining to the 2001 Nonstatutory Option Plan and the 2002Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Cell Genesys, Inc. 12) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108740) pertaining to the 1998 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 2002Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Cell Genesys, Inc. 13) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114720) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CellGenesys, Inc. 14) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-117569) pertaining to the 2001 Nonstatutory Option Plan of Cell Genesys,Inc. 15) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127158) pertaining to the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2002 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan of Cell Genesys, Inc. 16) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-131367) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CellGenesys, Inc. 17) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-132477) of Cell Genesys, Inc. 18) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-136369) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CellGenesys, Inc. 19) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-140449) of Cell Genesys, Inc. 20) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-140450) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of CellGenesys, Inc.of ourreport dated February 26, 2007, except for Note 14 as to which thedate is March 1, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements,and our report dated February 26, 2007, with respect to management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Cell Genesys, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPPalo Alto, California
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7180

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff ─ Appellee,

v.

JOHNNY GRAYSON,

Defendant ─ Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00046-FPS-JSK-1)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnny Grayson, Appellant Pro Se. Randolph John Bernard, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Grayson appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his “Motion Requesting Home Confinement Due to New 

Medical Issues and Relocation [of his supervised release] 

Because of Marriage.” We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Grayson, 

No. 5:08-cr-00046-FPS-JSK-1 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 23, 2011); see 18 

U.S.C. §§ 3621(b), 3625 (2006); Prows v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 

981 F.2d 466, 469-70 (10th Cir. 1992); United States v. 

Laughlin, 933 F.2d 786, 789-90 (9th Cir. 1991). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00163-CR

Terrell Ladel Davis

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1308456D)

October 1, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to exclude 

$26.80 from the total amount of $468.80 of court costs, fees, and fines that the 

judgment orders Terrell Ladel Davis to pay. Specifically, we modify the judgment 

so that the “Order to Withdraw Funds,” which the judgment expressly 

incorporates, requires Terrell Ladel Davis to pay $442. It is ordered that the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the annual report of Monster Beverage Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned, Rodney C. Sacks, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | April 13,   2017 | /s/ Rodney C. Sacks                                            |   |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                  | Rodney C. Sacks                                                |
|   |                  | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                                          <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                               DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                                 SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                                            1,682,000
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    20,781,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        298,000
<INVENTORY>                                                      12,968,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 37,637,000
<PP&E>                                                           51,545,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   35,988,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   53,501,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            17,432,000
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                            363,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                       28,816,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     53,501,000
<SALES>                                                          92,386,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 92,386,000
<CGS>                                                            69,627,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    69,627,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 15,140,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  563,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   7,056,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      2,784,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               4,272,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      4,272,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          1.16
        


</TABLE>
Order entered January 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00491-CR

CLOVIS BRAXTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court 

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F11-00729-H

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On December 11, 2012, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why 

appellant’s brief had not been filed. On December 31, 2012, appellant filed a motion to extend 

time to file his brief and on January 2, 2013, we received appellant’s brief. Therefore, in the 

interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the December 11, 2012 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the December 31, 2012 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief 

filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID W. EVANS

JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 92 (Wednesday, May 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 27306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11652]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, June 17, 2015, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE:  Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 ``M'' Street NE., Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS:  The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    OPEN SESSION:
    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Retaliation in the Workplace: Causes, Remedies, and Strategies 
for Prevention.

    Note:  In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. Seating is limited and it is suggested that visitors arrive 
30 minutes before the meeting in order to be processed through 
security and escorted to the meeting room. (In addition to 
publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the Federal 
Register, the Commission also provides information about Commission 
meetings on its Web site, eeoc.gov., and provides a recorded 
announcement a week in advance on future Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE 
INFORMATION: Bernadette B. Wilson, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 
663-4077.

    Dated: May 11, 2015.
Bernadette B. Wilson,
 Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2015-11652 Filed 5-11-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Deshaun Branch, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 550]

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered July 6, 1999, convicting him of *428burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and (2) a resentence of the same court, imposed February 24, 2000.

Ordered that the judgment and resentence are affirmed.

The defendant’s remarks at the time of his original sentencing on July 6, 1999, did not constitute a motion to dismiss the indictment on the basis of an unreasonable delay in sentencing. Accordingly, the defendant’s contention that the indictment should be dismissed for this reason is not preserved for appellate review (see, *People v Richardson,*262 AD2d 427; *People v Marshall,*228 AD2d 15; *People v Thompson,*193 AD2d 841). Under the circumstances of this case, we decline to review this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Altman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-4-003]


Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 18, 1997, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line 
Company (Panhandle) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective 
April 1, 1997:

Sub First Revised Sheet No. 339

    Panhandle asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order No. 587-B, Standards for Business Practices of 
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines issued on January 30, 1997 in Docket 
No. RM96-1-003 by incorporating by reference into its Tariff the 
Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards promulgated by the Gas Industry 
Standards Board and adopted by the Commission in Order No. 587-B.
    Panhandle states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and parties to 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before March 11, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4814 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Federal Trade Commission - Protection America's Consumers
Federal Trade CommissionBCP Business Center

          - About
          - Federal Trade Commission
          - File a Complaint
          - Order Publications
          - Privacy Policy

FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection - Business Center
YoutubeFacebookTwittereMail

              - Advertising and Marketing                 - Advertising and Marketing Basics
                - Children
                - Endorsements
                - Environmental Marketing
                - Health Claims
                - Made in USA
                - Online Advertising and Marketing
                - Telemarketing
              - Financial Services                 - Credit and Loans
                - Debt
                - Debt Collection
                - Mortgages
                - Payments and Billing
              - Privacy and Information Security                 - Children's Privacy
                - Consumer Privacy
                - Credit Reporting
                - Data Security
                - Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
                - Red Flags Rule
                - U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework
              - Selected Industries                 - Alcohol
                - Appliances
                - Automobiles
                - Clothing and Textiles
                - Finance
                - Funerals
                - Franchises, Business Opportunities, and Investments
                - Human Resources 
                - Jewelry
                - Non-Profits
                - Real Estate and Mortgages
                - Tobacco
              - Legal Resources                 - Case Highlights
                - Reports and Workshops
                - Laws, Rules, and Guides
                - Compliance Documents
              - Business Center Blog                 - Archives

              - Multimedia
              - Topics in Spanish

            - Print
            -         

## 404 Page Not Found

## The page you're looking for is currently unavailable to view

We've been upgrading our site.  It is possible that this page has  been moved or renamed.  You can use your browser's *Back* button  to return to the previous page, go  to the homepage, or you can browse or search for the information  you're looking for.

If you think that you have reached this page due to an error on  our part, please let us know.

### RSS

              - RSS - Plain Language Guidance
              - RSS - Legal Resources
              - RSS - Blog
              - RSS - Multimedia
              - RSS - Espanol

SHARE OUR RESOURCES. HERE'S HOW.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,325,370
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,391,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                        57,594
<INVENTORY>                                      5,870,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,481,634
<PP&E>                                          86,123,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,534,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,588,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,778,745
<BONDS>                                         28,325,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,011,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,588,217
<SALES>                                         11,826,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,163,645
<CGS>                                           10,948,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,464,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,535,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (305,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       197,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17,578
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17,578
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .03
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CertificationFurnished Pursuant to 

18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Financial Corporation (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November, 2007 (the “Report”), theundersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that: 

 

1.        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 

|                  |   |                                                                              |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   |
| By:    |   | /s/ David W. Mann                                                                 |
|                  |   | David W. Mann

Chief Executive Officer and Chief  Financial Officer

May 15, 2008 |

 

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FirstFinancial Corporation and will be retained by First Financial Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
#### TEXACO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H. O. ROY, INC., et al., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 2889.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana. Third Circuit.

Nov. 25, 1969.

On Rehearing Dec. 18, 1969.

Joseph Onebane and Robert L. Cabes, of Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

Gordon B. Hyde and Patrick Butler, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Bean & Rush, by Warren D. Rush, Domengeaux, Wright & Bienvenu, by Fred Smith, Lafayette, for defendant-ap-pellee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD and MILLER, JJ-

FRUGÉ, Judge.

The issues in this suit are identical to those in Texaco, Inc. v. H. O. Roy, Inc., La.App., 229 So.2d 739, a companion appeal rendered by us this date. For the reasons stated in the companion appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in *742favor of Texaco, Inc., plaintiff-appellee, at defendant-appellant’s cost.

Affirmed.

*On Application for Rehearing.*

En Banc.

PER CURIAM.

Our decision herein was rendered on November 25. The defendant-appellant, H. O. Roy, Inc., through his counsel, received notice of the judgment sent through certified mail by signed receipt dated the following day, November 26. The defendant’s application for rehearing is dated December 11 and was mailed the same day and is therefore not timely, for the reasons assigned in the companion case this day decided, Texaco, Inc. v. H. O. Roy, Inc. et al., La.App., 229 So.2d 739.

Application for rehearing not considered.