alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7458 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7458

To provide supplemental appropriations to provide direct assistance for 
domestic pork producers and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2020

 Mr. Hagedorn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide supplemental appropriations to provide direct assistance for 
domestic pork producers and during the COVID-19 pandemic, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``U.S. Pork Producer Assistance Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) It is imperative that domestic pork producers receive 
        financial assistance that adequately reflects the damages done 
        to the pork industry due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
            (2) While the coronavirus food assistance program carried 
        out by the Secretary of Agriculture provides relief to 
        livestock producers, the pork industry has faced unprecedented 
        challenges due to packing plants being forced to reduce 
        processing capacity.
            (3) To prevent further damage to the pork industry, further 
        funding assistance that includes direct funding for the pork 
        industry is necessary.

SEC. 3. ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY ACCOUNT.

    For an additional amount for the ``Office of the Secretary'', 
$5,000,000,000 to remain available until expended to provide support 
payments to pork producers with losses of market-ready hogs due to the 
COVID-19 pandemic: Provided, That such amount is designated by Congress 
as being for an emergency requirement pursuant to section 
251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985: Provided further, That such amounts shall be made 
available only if the President subsequently so designates such amount: 
Provided further: That such a payment may be made to a pork producer 
(regardless of the adjusted gross income of such producer) in any 
amount so long as such amount is not greater than the total losses of 
such pork producer of market-ready hogs due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT F

Case 2:21-cv-00640-RJS Document 2-6 Filed 10/28/21 PageID.35 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:21-cv-00640-RJS Document 2-6 Filed 10/28/21 PageID.36 Page 2 of 2
DLTR-2014-02-01-10K-Ex 10.14.2






Exhibit 10.14.2




October 10, 2013




H. Ray Compton






Dear Mr. Compton:


You and Dollar Tree, Inc. (the “Company”), entered into a Post-Retirement Benefit Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated June 21, 2007.  We hereby clarify the intent of the Agreement by adding the following provisions: 


		
	5.
	In the event that providing you or your spouse continued eligibility under the Company's group health plan (the "continuation coverage") is determined to be discriminatory pursuant to Section 105(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), or Section 2716 to the Public Health Service Act or to otherwise violate applicable law, then we will use our best mutual efforts to amend the Agreement such that the continuation coverage is not discriminatory or complies with applicable law.




		
	6.
	All payments made and benefits provided under the Agreement are intended to comply with Code Section 409A and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and the provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted and construed as necessary to comply with such intent.  To the extent any provision of this Agreement does not comply with Code Section 409A, such provisions shall be deemed amended to comply.












Very truly yours,






/s/ Bob Sasser___________
Bob Sasser
Chief Executive Officer





61






ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:  By signing this letter, I hereby acknowledge and accept the terms of the above amendment with the Company and consent to the above changes to the Agreement.




/s/ H. Ray Compton_______________________
H. Ray Compton





62
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001029 04-FEB-2015 12:04 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0016

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 24, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0016
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

November 10, 2014

Marcia Van Lentn

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 

Re: In the Matter of Made in the USA Brand, LLC

File No. 142 3121, Docket No. C-4497

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent agreement in 

the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment and placed it on the 

public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. §

4.9(b)(6)(ii).

In your comment, you state that products marked “‘Made in America’ should ONLY be made in 

America,” and request that the Commission require marketers to substantiate their U.S.-origin and other 

claims. You do not propose any revisions to the draft complaint or the consent agreement.

Section 5 of the FTC Act requires companies to possess substantiation for their marketing 

claims, and the Commission’s Enforcement Policy Statement on U.S.-Origin Claims provides specific 

guidance to marketers on how to substantiate those claims.1

 In particular, the Policy Statement provides 

that when a marketer makes an unqualified “Made in USA” claim, the marketer should – at the time the 

representation is made – possess and rely upon a reasonable basis establishing that the product is “all or 

virtually all” made in the United States. In this case, Section II of the consent agreement specifically 

requires Made in the USA Brand, LLC either to possess competent and reliable evidence substantiating 

its representations that products are made in the USA, or to disclose that it relies on self-certification to 

substantiate its clients’ claims.

Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission has determined that the relief set 

forth in the consent agreement is appropriate and sufficient to remedy the violations alleged in the 

complaint. At this time, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served by 

issuing the Decision and Order in final form without modification. The final Decision and Order and 

other relevant materials are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the 

Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, and we thank you again for your 

comment.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

 

1 See 15 U.S.C. § 45(a) and Federal Trade Commission, Issuance of Enforcement Policy Statement on 

“Made in USA” and Other U.S. Origin Claims, 62 Fed. Reg. 63756, 63766 (December 2, 1997), 

available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/1997/december/ 971202madeinusa.pdf.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jaime David Garcia

, * From the 32nd District

Court of Mitchell County,

Trial Court No. 7304

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00148

- CR * July 31, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey , J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court i s in all things affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee; Meeting 
Notice

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Washington Provincial Advisory Committee will 
meet on Friday, January 23, 1998, in Vancouver, Washington, at the 
Educational Service District 112 (2500 NE 65th Avenue). The meeting 
will begin at 10 a.m. and continue until 5 p.m. The purpose of the 
meeting is to: (1) Review and prioritize watershed restoration projects 
for 1998 and 1999, (2) Provide information on the Intergovernmental 
Advisory Committee Survey, (3) Share 1997 Advisory Committee Annual 
Report Information, and (4) Public Open Forum. All Southwest Washington 
Provincial Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. 
Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The ``open forum'' 
provides opportunity for the public to bring issues, concerns, and 
discussion topics to the Advisory Committee. The ``open forum'' is 
scheduled as part of agenda item (4) for this meeting. Interested 
speakers will need to register prior to the open forum period. The 
committee welcomes the public's written comments on committee business 
at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Sue Lampe, Public Affairs, at (360) 891-5091, or write 
Forest Headquarters Office, Gifford Pinchot National Forest, 10600 N.E. 
51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

    Dated: December 22, 1997.
Robert Yoder,
Province Lead Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-34000 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 

In the matter of 

AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS, S.A. 

Under section 4l3l0(c) of the international 

Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act, as amended. 

DOT-OST-2003-

15092 

MOTION OF AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS FOR 

AN ORDER EXTENDING THE 

TIME TO RESPOND TO THE 

MOTION OF THE JOINT 

COMPLAINANTS 

On March 2, 2011, the Joint Complainants made a motion for 

an order requiring distribution of the escrow funds. The Joint 

Complainants kindly agreed to an extension of time from March 

11, 2011 to April 5, 2011 to respond to the motion. 

Under the circumstances, Aerolineas moves to change the 

March 11 date to April 5, 2011. 

1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served the forgoing 

document bye-mail on the following persons. 

jeffrey:manley@united.com 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

celfelts@fedx.com 

d.fisher@kellydrye.com 

2 

John N. Romans 

March 10, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                        FINANCIAL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Financial  Industries  Corporation
("FIC") on Form 10- Q for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George
M. Wise, III, Chief Financial  Officer,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          FIC.




    /s/ George M. Wise, III
_____________________________
George M. Wise, III
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 14, 2003



                                     - 1 -
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 27624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12638]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4361-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]


Kentucky; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4361-DR), dated April 26, 2018, 
and related determinations.

DATE: This amendment was issued May 25, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the 
following area among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of April 26, 2018.

    Pendleton County for Public Assistance.
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2018-12638 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID GONZALEZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

PHUC LAM, Dr., 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 20-16876 

D.C. No. 4:18-cv-07508-YGR 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2021**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner David Gonzalez appeals pro se from the district 

court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate 

indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 20-16876 

2004). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Gonzalez 

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant Lam was 

deliberately indifferent to Gonzalez’s complaints of eye pain and other eye-related 

issues. See id. at 1060-61 (a prison official acts with deliberate indifference only if 

he or she knows of and disregards a risk to the prisoner’s health; medical 

malpractice, negligence or difference of opinion concerning the course of treatment 

does not amount to deliberate indifference). 

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION

SEP 27 2016

OSM

U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
exhibit_4-1.htm


 










 


Exhibit 4.1


 


 



		
1263


CERTIFICATE No.


 


1263


CERTIFICATE No.


 


Elbit Imaging Ltd.


incorporated under the Companies Ordinance


 


SHARE CERTIFICATE


 


THIS IS TO CERTIFY that


of


Is the Registered a Holder of 


 


Fully paid up Ordinary Shares each


numbered


 


inclusive, in ELBIT IMAGING LTD, subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the company.


 


Given under the Seal of the company at Tel-Aviv


this day of 200


Secretary


Director


Director
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe annual report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward K. Zinser, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Edward K. Zinser                                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Edward K. Zinser                                     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | May 30, 2007                                    |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
260 La. 64

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dornell COATS.

No. 51375.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 23, 1971.

George, Bennett, Lindsay, Bass & Seago, Ltd., John E. Seago, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

*76Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sargent Pitcher, Jr., Dist. Atty., Alton T. Moran, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Dornell Coats, pleaded guilty to two counts of simple burglary (R.S. 14:62) and was sentenced to five years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently. He appeals those convictions and sentences.

The Louisiana Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in criminal cases “in which the *penalty*of death or *imprisonment*at hard labor may be *imposed.”*(Emphasis added). La.Const, of 1921, Art. 7, Sec. 10(5). Code of Criminal Procedure Article 912 provides in part:

“A. Only a final judgment or ruling is appealable.

* * *

“C. The judgments or rulings from which the defendant may appeal include, but are not limited to:

“(1) A judgment which imposes sentence

Our cases consistently hold that a defendant can appeal from a *conviction and sentence.*Code of Criminal Procedure Article 934(3) provides: “‘Convicted’ means *adjudicated guilty after a plea*or after trial on the merits.” Code of Criminal Procedure Article 871 states in part: “A sentence is *the penalty imposed*by the court on a defendant upon a plea of guilty, upon a verdict of guilty, or upon a judgment of guilty.” A defendant is convicted by his plea of guilty, and he is sentenced when the penalty is imposed. Therefore he may appeal his conviction and sentence flowing from a plea of guilty. State v. Watson, 41 La.Ann. 598, 7 So. 125 (1889); State v. Bergeron, 152 La. 38, 92 So. 726 (1922).

However, a plea of guilty waives all defects prior to that plea except those jurisdictional defects which appear on the face of the pleadings and proceedings. State v. Valentine, decided November 8, 1971, 259 La. 1019, 254 So.2d 450. See also State v. Bergeron and State v. Watson, supra. We find no jurisdictional error prior to the guilty plea.

No bills of exception were reserved or perfected. We are therefore limited on appeal to a review of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable error. La.C. Cr.P. Art. 920. Examination of the pleadings and proceedings shows no error.

The convictions and sentences are affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Biomedical Informatics, Library and Data Sciences Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         November 15-16, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         November 15, 2018, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Hyatt, 1 Bethesda Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Time:*                         November 16, 2018, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Zoe E. Huang, MD, Acting Chief Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Office, Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-594-4937,                         *huangz@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 6, 2018.

Michelle D. Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-12536 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P