alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT10.7**

**FORM OF AFFIRMATION AND UNDERTAKING AGREEMENT**

**INCONNECTION WITH ADVANCEMENT OF EXPENSES**

The undersigned ___________(“Undersigned”), an [Officer/Director or Previous Officer] of Family DollarStores, Inc. (the “Company”), is a named party to an action captioned “RebeccaMiller, Derivatively on Behalf of Nominal Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc.v. Howard R. Levine, R. James Kelly, R. David Alexander, Jr., George R.Mahoney, Jr., John D. Reier, Albert S. Rorie, Philip W. Thompson, Mark R.Berstein, James G. Martin, and Sharon Allred Decker, Defendants, and FamilyDollar Stores, Inc., Nominal Defendant” filed in Mecklenburg CountySuperior Court, notice of which was received by the Company on August 25, 2006(the “Lawsuit”).  The Undersigned mayincur expenses in the defense of the Lawsuit and matters that may arise inconnection therewith.

The Undersigned hasrequested that the Company pay for or reimburse the attorney’s fees,disbursements, and other costs actually and reasonably incurred by theUndersigned in connection with the Lawsuit and matters that may arise inconnection therewith.

Upon receipt of andsubject to the terms of this Affirmation and Undertaking, the Company will payexpenses actually and reasonably incurred by the Undersigned in connection withthe Lawsuit and matters that may arise in connection therewith.

1.             The Undersigned hereby affirms [his] good faith beliefthat during [his] service as an [Officer] of the Company, [he]: (A) conducted[himself] in good faith; (B) has met the standard of conduct set forth inSection 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; and (C) believes that [he](i) has not engaged in any conduct in [his] official capacity with the Companythat was not in the best interests of the Company; (ii) has not otherwiseengaged in any conduct that was opposed to the best interests of the Company;and (iii) has no reasonable cause to believe that [his] current or past conductwas unlawful.

2.             The Undersigned hereby agrees to repay to the Companyany funds (i) advanced to the Undersigned in connection with the Lawsuit andmatters that may arise in connection therewith or (ii) paid on behalf of theUndersigned in advance of the final disposition of the Lawsuit and matters thatmay arise in connection therewith in the event that it shall ultimately bedetermined that [he] is not entitled to be indemnified.

Executed this the _______________day of _______________, 2006.
|         |   | Signature:    |   |
|---------|--------|---------------|--------|
|    |   | Printed Name: |   |
|    |   | Title:        |   |
|    |   |          |   |
| Witness |   |          |   |
|         |        |               |        |  |  |  |

 

----
#### ALFRED S. AUSTIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. Abe NAMIA, Appellee.

No. 69-427.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 8, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00626

- CR

Mark Anthony GUAJARDO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7064

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 113 (Tuesday, June 12, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27377-27378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12561]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


VA Prevention of Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Advisory Committee; 
Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, that the VA Prevention of Fraud, Waste, 
and Abuse Advisory Committee will meet virtually on July 19, 2018 from 
9:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. (EST). The toll-free telephone number for 
this meeting is (844) 825-8490, access code: 332244674#. Note: The 
telephone line will be muted except for the Committee and VA 
Executives. This meeting will be open the the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary, through 
the Assistant Secretary for Management and Chief Financial Officers, on 
matters relating to improving and enhancing VA's efforts to identify, 
prevent, and mitigate fraud, waste, and abuse across VA in order to 
improve the integrity of

[[Page 27378]]

VA's payments and the efficiency of its programs and activities.
    The agenda will include detailed discussions on Committee 
recommendations surrounding VA's community care programs.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Members of the public may submit written 
statements for the Committee's review to Karida Palmer via email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b4b5d4c5a5a58295b6d7a357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e2e38293f3f3d4c3e081f50191108">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: June 7, 2018.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018-12561 Filed 6-11-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 07, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 07, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0153. SHARON ALLEN v. JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 21SV00355
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                 
            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                
As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of our reports dated January 26, 1998, included in Northern
Border Partners, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1997, and to all references to our Firm
included in this Registration Statement.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
November 3, 1998
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 93 (Monday, May 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 28357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-11545]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 17 May 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: May 7, 2012, in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
AIA, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-11545 Filed 5-11-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26700-26701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12402]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Advancing Translational 
Sciences Special

[[Page 26701]]

Emphasis Panel; R13 Conference Grants Review.
    Date: July 10, 2018.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, Room 
1037, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Rahat Khan, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing 
Translational Sciences, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Rm 1078, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-594-7319, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, 
Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, 
B--Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research 
Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 5, 2018.
 David D. Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-12402 Filed 6-7-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         319,595
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,441,267
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               427,629
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         701,350
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           702,815
<LOANS>                                      5,155,752
<ALLOWANCE>                                    115,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,277,006
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,175,603
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             69,052
<LONG-TERM>                                    142,227<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,675
<OTHER-SE>                                     487,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,277,006
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                549,974
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               46,731
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 9,604
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               606,309
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             211,190
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             235,555
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          370,754
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  141,205
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                300,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,954
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      54,637
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,637
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   159.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   159.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,747
<LOANS-PAST>                                    74,698
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0<F2>
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               104,812
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  160,977
<RECOVERIES>                                    19,585
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              115,520
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 94,151 IN CAPITAL NOTES
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR INTERIM REPORTING PURPOSES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7808 

To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 (commonly referred 

to as the Communications Decency Act) to stop censorship, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2020 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. GOODEN, 

Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BANKS, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. YOHO, Mr. TIFFANY, 

Mr. WRIGHT, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. CRAWFORD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend section 230 of the Communications Act of 1934 

(commonly referred to as the Communications Decency 

Act) to stop censorship, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop the Censorship 

5 Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVOCATION OF IMMUNITIES. 

7 Section 230(c) of the Communications Act of 1934 

8 (47 U.S.C. 230(c)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7808 IH

1 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘AND SCREEN2 ING OF OFFENSIVE MATERIAL’’ and inserting ‘‘OF

3 UNLAWFUL OR OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

5 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 

6 (i) by striking ‘‘or otherwise objection7 able’’ and inserting ‘‘, unlawful, or that 

8 promotes violence or terrorism’’; and 

9 (ii) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a 

10 semicolon; 

11 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

12 ‘‘paragraph (1).’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraph 

13 (A); or’’; and 

14 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

15 subparagraph: 

16 ‘‘(C) any action taken to provide users 

17 with the option to restrict access to any other 

18 material, whether or not such material is con19 stitutionally protected.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Christine G. Ocampo, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cardiogenesis Corporation;  2.  Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this Annual Report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this Annual Report;  4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is beingprepared;
(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   /s/ CHRISTINE G. OCAMPO       Christine G. Ocampo  Chief Financial Officer  March 31, 2005
#### Virginia Gardner WISE, Petitioner, v. H. G. Spencer SMITH, Respondent.

No. 39775.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 234 So.2d 145.

ERVIN, C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1862306
<SECURITIES>                                    330422
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1313494
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         2198315
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1179921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7151366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1000
<OTHER-SE>                                     3992317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7151366
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3951976
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5722630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7631)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8421)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     89544
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
No. 10690.

#### Byers et al. *v.*The Cincinnati Railway Supply Co. et al.

Decided June 23, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. I. C. Burns; Messrs. Crum, Raymond & Hedges*and *Messrs. Arnold, Morton & Irvine,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Addison, Sinks & Babcock,*for defendants in eror.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis,’ JJ., concur.
261 La. 173

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Elliott HUBBS.

No. 51938.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 8, 1972.

*54F. Barry Marionneaux, Plaquemine, for defendant-appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Harry H. Howard, Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel C. Cashio, Dist. Atty., Joseph W. Cole, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment convicting the appellant of the crime of simple burglary, La.R.S. 14:62, and fixing his punishment at nine years at hard labor in the State Penitentiary. Appellant relies on two bills of exceptions to obtain a reversal for the conviction.

Both bills of exceptions stem from the same complaint. Defendant objected to the introduction of evidence and testimony concerning certain money and a wallet, allegedly belonging to the victim, found hidden in the house occupied by the defendant and his common-law wife.

We find no error in the trial court’s finding that the search and seizure and admissibility of evidence and testimony pertaining to it was constitutional and legal. The trial court’s per curiam sets forth one factual basis for this finding to the effect that even though the police entry into the dwelling was without a search warrant, permission was granted to enter the house by the woman with whom the defendant was living.

It is clear the common-law wife had authority over the house at the time of the search, and her consent to the search is valid. See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971); State v. Nelson, 261 La. 153, 259 So.2d 46 (rendered Feb. 21, 1972). See also State v. Andrus, 250 La. 765, 199 So.2d 867 (1967) ; State v. Comeaux, 252 La. 481, 211 So.2d 620 (1968).

The question of consent is a factual one which the evidence amply supports in this instance. Such a factual determination by the trial judge is given great weight and will not be disturbed upon appeal unless clearly erroneous. State v. Hall, 257 La. 253, 242 So.2d 239 (1970); State v. Lacoste, 256 La. 697, 237 So.2d 871 (1970).

For these reasons, we find the defendant-appellant’s contentions to be without merit. The conviction and the sentence are affirmed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

September 29, 2005

Joe Sims, Esq.

Jones Day

51 Louisiana Ave, NW

Washington, DC 20001

Re: The Procter & Gamble Company and The Gillette Company

File No. 051-0115

Dear Mr. Sims:

This letter notifies The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”) that the Federal Trade

Commission has approved the appointment of Mr. Edward A. Gold of PricewaterhouseCoopers

LLP (“PwC”), as the Interim Monitor, and has approved the Interim Monitor Agreement by and

between Edward A. Gold and P&G dated September 23, 2005, pursuant to Paragraph VI of the

Decision and Order and Paragraph III of the Order to Maintain Assets issued in the abovereferenced matter. 

In according its approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and

representations made by P&G and has assumed them to be accurate and complete. 

By direction of the Commission, Chairman Majoras and Commissioner Harbour recused.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Edward A. Gold

Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP

1900 K Street

Washington, DC 20006