alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

April 9th, 2007

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the
      "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 
|    | Consent of Expert                          

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) to
be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual
Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

On behalf of MDM Engineering (MDM), I hereby consent to the
use of my name and MDMs name in connection with reference to my and MDMs
involvement in the preparation of a technical report entitled Technical Report
on the Feasibility Study for the Burnstone Gold Project (the "Technical
Report") and to references to the Technical Report, or portions thereof, in the
Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by reference of the
information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual Report.

Yours truly,

MDM Engineering

/s/ Dave Dodd

Dave Dodd

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                           3,939
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (648)
<INVENTORY>                                     36,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,298
<PP&E>                                         126,918
<DEPRECIATION>                                (65,546)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 126,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,754
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,622
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   126,071
<SALES>                                        166,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          123,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    391
<INCOME-TAX>                                       133
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                258
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       23
        

</TABLE>
PUBLIC DOCUMENT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

____________________________________

)

In the Matter of )

)

California Naturel, Inc., ) Docket No. 9370

a corporation, )

)

Respondent. )

)

COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S SECOND STATUS REPORT

Pursuant to the Administrative Law Judge’s June 29, 2016, Order, Complaint Counsel 

submits its Second Status Report. As stated in Complaint Counsel’s Initial Status Report, 

Complaint Counsel believed that, on May 19, 2016, it had reached a tentative agreement with 

Respondent. On May 20, Complaint Counsel forwarded to Respondent a proposed consent 

agreement and draft joint motion to withdraw this matter from adjudication. Complaint Counsel 

has not heard back from Respondent since May 20 notwithstanding Complaint Counsel making 

repeated efforts to contact Respondent, including by leaving messages on the voicemails of 

Respondent’s business number and Mr. Duler’s mobile phone and by sending emails to 

Respondent. Complaint Counsel’s efforts to contact Respondent to prepare and file a Joint 

Status Report were similarly unsuccessful.

Dated: July 1, 2016 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robert M. Frisby

Robert M. Frisby (202) 326-2098

John Andrew Singer (202) 326-3234

Division of Enforcement

Bureau of Consumer Protection 

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Mailstop CC-9528

Washington, DC 20580

07 01 2016

583196 S 07 01 2016

583196
Notice of Electronic Service

I hereby certify that on July 01, 2016, I filed an electronic copy of the foregoing Complaint Counsel's Second

Status Report, with:

D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Suite 110

Washington, DC, 20580

Donald Clark

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Suite 172

Washington, DC, 20580

I hereby certify that on July 01, 2016, I served via E-Service an electronic copy of the foregoing Complaint

Counsel's Second Status Report, upon:

Robert Frisby

Attorney

Federal Trade Commission

rfrisby@ftc.gov

Complaint

John Singer

Attorney

Federal Trade Commission

jsinger@ftc.gov

Complaint

I hereby certify that on July 01, 2016, I served via other means, as provided in 4.4(b) of the foregoing

Complaint Counsel's Second Status Report, upon:

john bernard duler

president

california natural

jbduler@californianaturel.com

Respondent

Robert Frisby

Attorney
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3831]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice No. 2509]


Shipping Coordinating Committee, Subcommittee for the Prevention 
of Marine Pollution; Notice of Meeting

    The Subcommittee for the Prevention of Marine Pollution (SPMP), a 
subcommittee of the Shipping Coordinating Committee, will conduct an 
open meeting on Tuesday, March 4, 1997, at 9:30 a.m. in Room 2415, U.S. 
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC.
    The purpose of this meeting will be to review the agenda items to 
be considered at the thirty-ninth session of the Marine Environment 
Protection Committee (MEPC 39) of the International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) to be held from March 10-14, 1997. Proposed U.S. 
positions on the agenda items for MEPC will be discussed.
    The major items for discussion will be the following:
    a. Development of a draft protocol to amend the International 
Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as 
modified by the Protocol of 1978, to include Annex VI (Air Pollution) 
regulations.
    b. Work relating to the human element.
    c. Harmful aquatic organisms in ballast water.
    d. Identification and protection of Special Areas and particularly 
sensitive sea areas.
    e. Implementation of the Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response, and 
Co-operation (OPRC) Convention and Oil Pollution Preparedness Response 
Conference resolution, including expansion of the OPRC Convention to 
include Hazardous Substances.
    Members of the public may attend these meetings up to the seating 
capacity of the room.
    For further information or documentation pertaining to the SPMP 
meeting, contact Ensign Lamont Bazemore, U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters 
(G-MSO-4), 2100 Second Street, SW. Washington, DC 20593-0001; 
Telephone: (202) 267-0713.

    Dated: January 30, 1997.
Russell A. LaMantia,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-3831 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6444
STACY PHELPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. DAVIS, Food Manager, Head Supervisor; DAVIS ROBISON, Warden; E. B. WALKER, Assistant Warden, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-169-2) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 24, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stacy Phelps, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Phelps v. Davis , No. CA-97-169-2 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fansteel Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, Gary L. Tessitore, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and R. Michael McEntee, as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Fansteel Inc. and will be retained
by Fansteel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated: May 13, 2005

                                      /s/ Gary L. Tessitore
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Gary L. Tessitore
                                      Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
                                      Executive Officer

                                      /s/ R. Michael McEntee
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      R. Michael McEntee
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```
**Exhibit 23(a)**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
The Board of DirectorsOxford Health Plans, Inc.:
     We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements (Nos. 33-49738, 33-70908,333-988, 333-28109, 333-35693, 33-94242, 333-79063, 333-42920and 333-33226) on Form S-8 of Oxford Health Plans, Inc. ofour reports dated January 24, 2003, relating to theconsolidated balance sheet of Oxford Health Plans, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and therelated consolidated statements of operations,shareholders’ equity and comprehensive earnings and cashflows for each of the three years in the period endedDecember 31, 2002, which report appears in theDecember 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of OxfordHealth Plans, Inc.
 ERNST & YOUNG LLP    
New York, New YorkFebruary 3, 2003
88
#### Gerald SWANSON and Barbara Swanson, his wife, Appellants, v. Charleen F. DENTON, Appellee.

No. 71-650.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE PAVING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. W. L. BAINBRIDGE, and Herbert J. Elkins, Appellees.

No. 72-814.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John L. JOHNSTON.

No. 61192.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: John L. Johnston applying for writs of certiorari. Parish of Morehouse.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., dissenting.
**EXHIBIT 21.01**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE RESGITRANT**

 
| **SUBSIDIARY**                                                                                                                                               |   | **JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                         |   |                              |
| Versant Gmbh  Arabellastrasse 4  D-81925 Müenchen  Germany  +49-89-920078-0 (phone)  +49-89-920078-44 (fax)                                             |   | Germany                           |
|                                                                                                                                                         |   |                              |
| Versant Ltd  Unit 4.2, Intec Business Park  Wade Road, Basingstoke  Hampshire RG24 8NE  United Kingdom  +44 (0)1256 366500 (phone)  +44 (0)1256 366555 (fax) |   | United Kingdom                    |
|                                                                                                                                                         |   |                              |
| Versant India  Subhadra, 1240 A Apte Road  Shivajinagar, Pune  411 004 India  +91-20-553-9909  +91-20-553-9908                                               |   | India                             |

 

----
1 

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00355-CR

__________________

MARVIN GABRIEL HOLMES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. F21-37984 

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Marvin Gabriel Holmes guilty of evading arrest or detention 

with previous convictions, a state jail felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.04(a), 

(b)(1)(A). The jury assessed Holmes’s punishment as a prior felony offender at six

years of imprisonment. See id. § 12.425(b). 
2

Holmes’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel’s 

professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1978). On April 5, 2024, we granted an extension of time for Holmes to 

file a pro se brief. Holmes filed a pro se brief in response. 

The Court of Criminal Appeals has held that when a court of appeals receives 

an Anders brief and a later-filed pro se response, an appellate court has two choices.

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). “It may 

determine that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it 

has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error[;] [o]r, it may determine that 

arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new 

counsel may be appointed to brief the issues.” Id. (citations omitted).

Upon receiving an Anders brief, a court must conduct a full examination of 

the record to determine whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. Penson v. Ohio, 488 

U.S. 75, 80 (Tex. 1988) (citing Anders, 386 U.S. at 744). We have reviewed the 

entire record, counsel’s brief, and Holmes’s pro se brief, and we have found no 

reversible error, and we conclude the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe, 178 

S.W.3d at 826–27. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new 
3

counsel to re-briefthe appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1

AFFIRMED.

 W. SCOTT GOLEMON

 Chief Justice

Submitted on June 5, 2024

Opinion Delivered June 19, 2024

Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ. 

1Holmes may challenge our decision by filing a petition for discretionary 

review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.1.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7775 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the eastern and middle 

judicial districts of North Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2020 

Mr. HOLDING (for himself, Mr. HUDSON, and Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the 

eastern and middle judicial districts of North Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DISTRICTS OF NORTH CAROLINA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 113 of title 28, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and Wilson 

7 and’’ and inserting ‘‘Wilson, those portions of Hoke, 

8 Moore, Scotland, and Richmond counties encom9 passing the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and 

10 Camp Mackall, and’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7775 IH

1 (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(b) MIDDLE DISTRICT.—The Middle District com4 prises the counties of Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chat5 ham, Davidson, Davie, Durham (excluding that portion of 

6 Durham County encompassing the Federal Correctional 

7 Institution, Butner, North Carolina), Forsyth, Guilford, 

8 Hoke (excluding that portion of Hoke County encom9 passing the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp 

10 Mackall), Lee, Montgomery, Moore (excluding that por11 tion of Moore County encompassing the Fort Bragg Mili12 tary Reservation and Camp Mackall), Orange, Person, 

13 Randolph, Richmond (excluding that portion of Richmond 

14 County encompassing the Fort Bragg Military Reserva15 tion and Camp Mackall), Rockingham, Rowan, Scotland 

16 (excluding that portion of Scotland County encompassing 

17 the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), 

18 Stanly, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin.’’. 

19 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub20 section (a) shall not apply to any action commenced or 

21 pending in any judicial district of North Carolina before 

22 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GREM USA (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Miers, the sole
officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                             /S/ EDWARD MIERS
                                             ----------------
                                             Edward Miers
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
                                             AUGUST 19, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Network CN Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Fu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jennifer FuJennifer FuChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





January 28, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Network CN Inc. and will be retained by Network CN Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of
Klever Marketing, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Paul G. Begum, Chairman and Principal Executive Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.









Date:
      May 14, 2009/S/
      Paul G. BegumPaul
      G. BegumCEO
      & Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)


May 14,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.