**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR P**  **art 60, S**  **ubpart TT) (Renewal)**
**1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coati ng (40 CFR P art 60, S ubpart TT) (Renewal) EPA I CR Number 0660.11, OMB Control Number 2060

- 0107 **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the regulations published at 40 CFR part 60, subpart TT were proposed on January 5, 1981 and promulgated on November 1, 1982 , amended on June 24, 1986, and October 17, 2000 . These regulations apply to the following surface coating lines in the metal coil surface coating industry : each prime coat operation, each finish coat operation, and each prime and finish coat operation cured simultaneously where the finish coat is applied wet on wet over the prime coat. These regulations apply t o metal coil coating facilities commencing construction, modification, or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart TT. In general, all New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports. O wners or op erators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility , or any

period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all sources subject to NSPS. Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least two years foll owing the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegate d state or local authority . In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Approximately 1 58 sources are currently subject to the regulation, and it is estimated that no additional sources per year will become subject to the regulation in the next three years. Inthe United States, there are approximately 1 58 metal coil surface coating facilities which are owned and operated by the metal coil surface coating industry (the “Affected Public”). The se facilities are privatel y o wned for

- profit businesses, and are not owned b y state, local, tribal , or the Federal government. The burden to the “Affected Public” is listed in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden and Cost

– NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal). The Federal government burden associated with th e review of reports submitted by the respondent is shown in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden

– NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal).2

In the development of this Information C ollection R equest (I CR) , we addressed the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) “Terms of Clearance (TOC)” on the active IC R. The TOC are as follows : This collection of information is approved fo r 3 years. Before

resubmission of this ICR, the Agenc y s hould update wage estimates, continuing to refer to most recentl y available data from Bureau of Labor Statistics. In addition, the agency should verify the number of respondent entities. EPA has addressed ea ch item of concern in the TOC. The updated labor rates and the number of respondents have been thoroughly checked , and all estimates have been updated.
**2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under s ection 111 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, to establish standards of performan ce for new stationary sources that reflect:

**. . .** application of the best technological sy stem of continuous emissions reduction which (taking into consideration the cost of achieving such emissions reduction, or any non - air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements) the Administrator determines has been adequatel y demonstrated. Section 111(a)(l). The Agency

refers to this charge as selecting the best demonstrated technology (BDT). Section 111 also requires that the Administrator review and, if appropriate, revise such standards every four years. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any o wner or operator subject to any

requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Sec tion 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require.3

In the Administrator's judgment, volatile organic compound (VOC ) emissions from metal coil surface coating cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably

be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NSPS was promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 60, subpart TT

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting req uirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. Ina ddition, the collected information is used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Perfor mance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility’s i nitial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance tests, a reco rd of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to ensure that the pollution control devices are properl y in stalled and operated , that leaks are being detected and repaired, and that the standards are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determi ne periods of excess emissions, to identify problems at the facility , to verify operation/maintenance procedures and compliance.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 60, subpart TT

. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency
. If a state or local agency h as adopted their own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the repor t submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required b y the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication exists. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB** An announcement of a public c omment period for the renewal of this IC R was published in the Federal Register (7 6 FR 26900 ) on May 9 , 20 11 . No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations**4

The Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulte d, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the st andard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance. OTIS is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for the industry is based on our consultations with the Agenc y’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the stan dard as it was being developed. In dev eloping this ICR, we reviewed information available from the United States Census Bureau, and websites covering metal coil surface coating. W e also consulted with the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Information Transfer, and Program Integration Division , the National Coil Coating Association at ( 216 ) 241

- 7333 , and White Engineering Surfaces Corporation at (215) 968

- 5021

. After a thorough review, i t is our policy t o respond to comments received since the last ICR renewal , as well as to those subm itted in response to the f irst Federal Register n otice. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required b y these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines** These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. E PA believes that the five

- ye ar records retention requirement is consistent with the part 70 permit program and the five

- ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. The retention of records for five ye ars allows the EPA to establish the compliance history of a sourc e, any pattern of non

- compliance, and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond the five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violator s due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any i nformation submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality i s made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

-5

Confidentiality

of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended b y 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions** The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes**  The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are bulk gasoline ter minals. The United States Standard Industrial Classification (SI C) code for the respondents affected b y the standards is SI C 3479 which corresponds to the North American Industry Classification System (NAI CS) 332812 for Metal Coating, Engraving (Except Je welry and Silverware), and Allied Service to Manufacturing

. **4(b) Information Requested** None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the regulations established by

OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. **(i) Data Items** In this ICR, all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal)

. A source must make the following reports:
**Notifications** Notification of construction/reconstruction 60.7(a)(1) Ant icipated startup 60.7(a)(2) Notification of actual startup 60.7(a)(3) Initial performance test results 60. 8 (a) , 60.465(b) Initial performance test 60. 8 ( d) , 60.465(b) Demonstration of continuous monitoring sy stem 60. 7 ( a) (5) Phy sical or operational chan ge 60. 7 ( a) (4) A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Maintain records of startup, shutdown, or malfunction period where the continuous monitoring system is inoperative 60.7(b)6 **Recordkeeping** Excess emissions report 60.7(c), 60.465(c), 60.465(d) M onthly performance test of volume

- weighted average emissions of VOCs kg/l of coating solids applied 60.463(b), 60.463(c) Record average VOC content of coatings applied monthly 60.464(a), 60.464(b) For thermal incineration: install, calibrate, maintain, and operate temperature monitoring device 60.464(c) Records are required to be retained for 2 ye ars. The first two years of records must be retained at the facility. 60.7(f), 60.465(e) For catal ytic incineration: maintain daily records of upstream and do wnstream gas temperature 60.465(e) Maintain daily

records of incinerator combustion temperature, or amounts of solvent recovered 60.464(c), 60.465(e) Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are not widel y used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 1 0 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.
**R espondent Activities**  Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate a device that continuously records the combustion temperature of any effluent gases incinerated to achieve compliance. Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 2 4, Reference Method 25, or data provided by the formulator of the coating, and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Adjust the existing way s to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.7

**R espondent Activities**  Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently , sources are using monitoring equipment that provides parameter data in an automated way (e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem). Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this ty pe of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Mana**  **gement 5(a) Agency Activities** 
EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information. **Agency Activities** Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests i f necessary

. Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information sy stem ( OTI S )

. **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y i nstalled and operational

. P erformance test reports are us ed b y the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard, and to note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. D ata and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operat ed and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance. OTIS is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. E PA uses OTIS for tracking air pollution c ompliance and enforcement by l ocal and state regulatory

a gencies, EPA regional offices, and EPA headquarters. EPA delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve , and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner or operator for two ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility**8

The majority

of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. T o the ex tent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collectio n Schedule**  The specific frequency

f or each information collection activity w ithin this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Industry Burden for NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal). **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection**  Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings b elieved to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Wherever appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 15,643 (Total Labor Hours from Table 1). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency

knowledge and experience with the NSPS program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $119.36 ($56.84 + 110%) Technical $99.18 ($47.23 + 110%) Clerical $49.35 ($23 .50 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2011, "Table 2. Civilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry group." The rates are from column 1, "Total Compensation." The rates have been incre ased by 110 percent to account for the9

benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pes of industry

costs associated with the information collection activitie s in the subject standard are both labor costs , which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR

. and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. Th e capital/startup costs are one

- time cost when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  (A) Co ntinuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital / Startup Cost, ( B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F) Tem perature $ 8,000 0 $ 0 $ 2,100 158 $ 331,800 The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are zero. This is the total of column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $ 331,800 . This is the total of column G.
The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three ye ars of the I CR is estimated to be $ 331,800

. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with an al ys is of the reported information. EPA’s overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as: the examination of records maintained by the respondents; periodic inspection of sources of emissions; and the publication and distribution o f collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 39,283

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $62.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 + 60%) Technical $46.21 ( GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 + 60%) Clerical $25.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 + 60%)
These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2011 General Schedule” which excludes locality

rates of pay . The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government emplo ye es
. Details upon which this estimate is based10

appear in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden, NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal)

. **6(d) Estimating the Responde nt Universe and Total Burden and Costs**  Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 158 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that no additional respondent per year will become s ubject to the standard . The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below, is 158 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR. **Number of Respondent s** 

Year (A)

Number of New Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 0 158 0 0 158 2 0 158 0 0 158 3 0 158 0 0 158 Average 0 158 0 0 158

1 New respondent s include sources with constructed, reconstructed , and modified affected facilities. To avoid double

- counting respondents , column D is subtracted. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three

- ye ar period of this ICR is 158

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table: **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E)

Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Notification of construction/reconstruction 0 1 0 0 Notification o f performance test 0 1.2 0 0 Notification of a ctual startup 0 1 0 0 Report of performance test 0 1.2 0 0 Emissions report 1 58 2 0 316 Tem perature variance report 126 0.5 0 63 Total 3 7911

The number of Total Annual Responses is 3 79

. The total annual labor costs are $ 1,497,459 . Details regardin g these estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual In dustry Burden and Cost

– NSPS Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal). **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours Burden Hours and Cost Tables**
The detailed bottom line burden hours and cos t calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally**
The total annual labor hours are 15,643

. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1 : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost: NSPS for Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal). Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 41 hours per response.
The total annual capital/startup and operation and maintenance ( O&M ) costs to the regulated entity are $ 331,800

.

**(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over the next three years is estimated to be 872 labor hours at a cost of $ 39,283 . Se e Table 2 : Annual Agency Burden and Cost Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT ) (Renewal). **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is no change in the labor hours in this I CR compared to the previous ICR. Consultations with the Offi ce of Air Quality Planning and S tandards (OAQPS) and trade associatio ns reveal ed that there are approximately 158 sources subject to the rule, with no new facilities expected to be constructed over the next three years of this ICR. However, there is an incre ase in the estimated burden cost as currentl y identified in the OMB Inventory

of Approved Burdens. The increase is not due to any program changes. The change in burden is due to the use of the most updated labor rates. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annu al public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 41 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by

persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provi de information to or for a Federal agency . This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,12

install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintainin g information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to comply with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete an d review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The O MB Control Numbers for EPA ’ s regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any s uggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, in cluding the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this IC R under Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 20 11

- 02 2 6

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http: //www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the content of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically . When in the sy stem, select “search” than key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and In formation Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D

. C. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is (202) 566

- 1927

. Also, yo u can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, N.W., Washington, D

. C

. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 20 11

- 02 2 6 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0 1 0 7 in any correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable be cause no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.**Table 1:**  **A nnual**  **Respondent Burden**  **and Cost** 

**– NSPS**  **for Metal**  **Coil Surface**  **Coating (40**  **CFR Part**  **60, Subpart**  **TT )**  **(Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurr**  **ences per**  **respondent per year**  **(C)**

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Total Cost Per year**  **b**

1. Applications N/A 2. Survey and Studies N/A 3. Reporting requirements A. Read instructions 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 B. Required activities Initial performance tests c 6 0 1 60 0 0 0 0 $0 Repeat of p erformance tests d 60 0.2 12 0 0 0 0 $0 C . Gather existing information See 3B D . Write Report Notification of construction/reconstruction e 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of initial performance test e 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of actual startup e 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Report of performance test See 3B Emissions report f 5 2 10 1 58 1,580 79 158 $ 173,931.14 Tem perature variance report g 4 0.5 2 12 6 252 12.6 25.2 $ 27,740.92 Subtotal for Reporting Requirements 2,106.8 4. Recordkeeping requirements A. Read instructions See 3A B. Plan activities See 3B C. Implement activities (monthly performance test) h 1 12 12 1 58 1,896 94.8 189.6 $ 208,717.36 D. Develop record system Records of operating parameter i 0.25 250 62.5 1 58 9,875 493.75 987.5 $ 1,087, 069.62 Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements 13,536.65 **Subto tals: Labor Burden and costs**  13,603 680.15 1,360.3 $ 1,497,459.04 **TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  15,643.45 15,643 (rounded) $ 1,497,459

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that there are approximately 1 58 respondents, with no additional new or reconstructed sources becoming subject to the rule over the next14

three years. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $ 1 19.36 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $99.18 per hour for Technical labor, and $49.35 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 2 011, Table 2. C ivilian Workers, by Occupational and Industry groups. The rates are from column 1, Total Compensation. The rates have been increased by 110 per cent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry. c We have assumed th at it will take 60 hour s for each respondent to perform initial performance tests. All sources are in compliance with the initial rule requirements including the initial performance test. d We have assumed that 20 percent of sources would have to repeat the performance test due to failure. e We have assumed that it will take each respondent two hours once per year to w rite the report. f We have assumed that each respondent will take 5 hours twice per year to complete the performance test report. g We h ave assumed that 80 percent of facilities will use incineration, and will file a temperature variance report every other year. h We have assumed that each respondent will take 1 hour once per month to implement the performance test. i We have assumed th at each respondent will take 0.25 hours 250 times per year to develop the operating parameter record system.15

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden**
**- NSPS for**  **Metal Coil Surface Coating (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TT**  **) (Renewal)** 

**Activity (A)**  **EPA person**  **** **hours per occurrence**  **(B)**

**No. of occurrence**  **s per plant per year**  **(C)**

**EPA person**  **** **hours per plant per**  **year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Plants per**  **year a**  **(E) Technical**  **person**   ** hours per** **year (E=CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Cost, $ b** 

Initial performance test New plant 24 1 24 0 0 0 0 $0 Repeat performance test New plant c 24 0.2 4.8 0 0 0 0 $0 Report review New plant Notification of construction 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of initial startup d 0.5 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of actual startup d 0.5 1 0.5 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of initial test d 0.5 1.2 0.6 0 0 0 0 $0 Review test results e 8 1.2 9.6 0 0 0 0 $0 Existing plant VOC emissions report f 2 2 4 1 58 632 31.6 63.2 $ 32,753.08 Tem perature reports g 2 0.5 1 1 26 1 26 6.3 12.6 $ 6,529.89 Subtotals Labor Burden and cost 758 37.9 75.8 $ 39,282.97 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)**  871.7 872 (rounded) $ 39,283

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that there are approximately 1 5 8 respondents, with no additional new or reconstructed sources becoming subject to the rule over the next three years. b This cost is based on the following hourly labor rates times a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government o verhead expenses: $62.27 for Managerial (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 x 1.6), $46.21 for Technical (GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 x 1.6) and $25.01 Clerical (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) A 2011 General Schedule @ which excludes locality rates of pay.
c We have assumed that 20 percent of respondents will repeat the performan ce tests due to failure. d We have assumed that each respondent will take 0.5 hours to review the startup and initial test notifications.
e We have assumed that each respondent will take 8 hours to review the test results. f We have assumed that e ach re spondent will take 2 hours twice per year to review the VOC emissions report. g We have assumed that 80 percent of facilities will use incineration, and will file a temperature variance report every other year.