alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general informat ion regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs ca n be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone a t 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737. *** Final Site *** March 2011


### WASHINGTON COUNTY LE AD

DISTRICT

– FURNACE CREEK Cale do n ia
, Missouri Washington County

 **Site Location :** 
The Washington County Lead District

– Furnace Creek (Furnace Creek) s ite is located in a heavily min ed region of eastern Missouri known as the Washington County Lead District. The site includes residential areas within and around the towns of Caledonia, Irondale, Belgrade, and Hopewell

. The Furnace Creek site includes contamination located within a 175 square mile area in the southeastern portion of Washington County, Missouri

.

 **Site History:**
The Washington County Lead District is part of Missouri’s Old Lead Belt, where lead mining has occurred for hundreds of years. The Old Lead Belt provided approx imately 80 percent of the lead produced in the United States. A dditionally, this area is part of the barite mineralization district of Missouri. After the Civil War, numerous small barite mines operated in Washington County , which was the world’s leading producer of barite before declining in the 1980s. Many of the later large mining operations reworked lands that were previously hand mined for galena (mineral source of lead) or barite.

Wa shington County has hosted more than 1,000 lead and barite mining , milling, or smelting sites

.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:**
The Furnace Creek site includes source piles, tailing ponds and residences with elevated levels of lead throughout the area. The piles primarily consist of overburden and tailings from min eral mining and processing. Heavy metal soil contamination is present at elevated concentrations at more than 400 residential properties. To date , there are more than 1 6 private residential wells with lead contamination.

 **Potential Impacts on Surround ing Community/Environment**  **:**
The Furnace Creek site includes e levated levels of heavy metals found du ring sampling conducted in 200 9. Additionally,

residen tial yards, ground water, and surface water have various elevated levels of heavy metals.

 **Response Activities (to date):** 

EPA response activities include providing bottled water to residences and excavation of more than 150 residential yards in

the Furnace Creek area.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**

The S tate of Missouri referred th e site to EPA

. Other federa l and state cleanup programs were evaluated , but were not
viable at this time

.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

CertificationFurnished Pursuant to 

18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 

Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Financial Corporation (the"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on August 18, 2006 (the "Report"), the undersigned, who isthe Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.            the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.            the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 

|                       |  |                                                                                            |
|-----------------------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |  |
| By:    |  | /s/ David W. Mann                                                                          |
|                       |  | David W. Mann

Chief Executive Officer and  Chief  Financial Officer

August 18, 2006 |

 

 

*A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FirstFinancial Corporation and will be retained by First Financial Corporation. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7810 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

3519 East Walnut Street in Pearland, Texas, as the ‘‘Tom Reid Post 

Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2020 

Mr. OLSON (for himself, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. TAYLOR, Mr. 

GOODEN, Mr. WRIGHT, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. BRADY, Mr. GREEN of 

Texas, Mr. MCCAUL, Mr. CONAWAY, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. THORNBERRY, 

Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Ms. ESCOBAR, Mr. FLORES, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. ARRINGTON, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. 

ROY, Mr. HURD of Texas, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CLOUD, Mr. CUELLAR, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Ms. JOHNSON

of Texas, Mr. CARTER of Texas, Mr. ALLRED, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. VELA, 

Mr. DOGGETT, and Mr. BABIN) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3519 East Walnut Street in Pearland, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Tom Reid Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TILDEN VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 3519 East Walnut Street in 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7810 IH

1 Pearland, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Tom Reid Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Tom Reid Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Roger L. DAVIS, Appellant, v. Darlene C. DAVIS, Appellee.

No. 2478.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000036548
<NAME> FIRST MORTGAGE CORP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                         153,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  611,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               765,219
<PP&E>                                           6,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,015,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,864
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,102
<OTHER-SE>                                     883,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,015,512
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               406,096
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,316
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                214,780
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,119
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            147,661
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    147661
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Appendix III 

Locations of FTC Buildings and Regional Offices 

In addition to the FTC’s headquarters building at 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20580, the FTC has a satellite building at 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, 

DC 20024, and also operates the following Regional Offices where Privacy Act records may in 

some cases be maintained or accessed: 

East Central Region 

Eaton Center, Suite 200 

1111 Superior Avenue 

Cleveland, OH 44114-2507 

Midwest Region 

230 South Dearborn Street, Suite 3030, 

Chicago, IL 60604 

Northeast Region 

Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House 

One Bowling Green, Suite 318 

New York, NY 10004 

Northwest Region 

915 Second Avenue, Suite 2896 

Seattle, WA 98174 

Southeast Region 

233 Peachtree Street, NE, 

Harris Tower, Suite 1000 

Atlanta, GA 30303 

Southwest Region 

1999 Bryan Street, Suite 2150 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Western Region–Los Angeles 

10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 400 

Los Angeles, CA 90024 

Western Region–San Francisco 

90 7th Street, Suite 14-300 

San Francisco, CA 94103 

In addition, FTC records subject to the Privacy Act may sometimes be maintained at 

other facilities leased by the FTC or operated by FTC contractors, including by other Federal 

agencies, or by the National Archives and Records Administration on the FTC’s behalf.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

_____________________

No. 16-2444

JWAINUS PERRY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LUIS S. SPENCER, Commissioner; THOMAS DICKAUT, Former Superintendent; ANTHONY 

MENDOSA, Former Deputy of Classification; JAMES SABA, Superintendent; ABBE 

NELLIGAN, Deputy of Classification; PATRICK TOOLIN, Correctional Program Officer; 

KRISTIE LADOUCER; CAROL MICI; THOMAS NEVILLE,

Defendants - Appellees,

JENS SWANSON, Property Officer,

Defendant.

__________________

Before

Howard, Chief Judge,

Lynch, Thompson, Kayatta , Barron and Gelpí, 

Circuit Judges,

__________________

ORDER OF COURT

Entered: January 3, 2022

A majority of the active judges who are not disqualified have voted to hear this case en 

banc. Accordingly, the petition for rehearing en banc is granted. In accordance with customary 

practice, the panel opinion released on August 29, 2018 is withdrawn, and the judgment entered 

the same date is vacated. See 1st Cir. I.O.P. X(D). 

The en banc court will have copies of the parties' previously filed briefs. The parties are 

also directed to file simultaneous supplemental briefs on or before February 3, 2022. Such briefs 

should not exceed 30 pages, and shall otherwise comply with applicable rules concerning format, 

service and other requirements. 
Amici are welcome to file amicus briefs, also not to exceed 30 pages per brief, no later than 

7 days after the principal supplemental briefs are filed, but must seek prior leave of court. 

Any reply supplemental briefs must be filed by the parties no later than 21 days after the 

amici briefing deadline. Reply briefs are limited to 15 pages. 

The en banc court will conduct oral argument remotely in this case on Friday, April 8, 

2022, at 10:00 a.m.

By the Court:

Maria R. Hamilton, Clerk

cc: 

Jwainus Perry

Alexis Garmey Chardon

Daniel Greenfield

Sheryl Grant

Jenipher R. Jones

Ilya Shapiro

Matthew R Segal

John Joseph Butts

Josefina B. Garcia
# ® \.G.(j 

### L ' VC I' 

### ALO DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE , PRO CESS, ORD E RS DECISIONS AND REQU I REM E NTS ATl'ENTION DO CKET SECT IO N, C-55

__ _ **...:.Y_,_ V_,_,_,A"'C,_,O<.!L"-'O~M**  **!..!.!.."B<"-I'-' '----**  **--- -------**  **--------'** having its prin ci p a l (Na m e of Co mpan y, please pr in t ) Office a t ---- -------- - (a ddress) Hereby de s ignate s, pur suant to sec tion 46 103 ofTitle 49 of t he U.S. Code ( formerly se cti on 1 005(b) of the Fede r al Aviat ion Act o f 1958, as ame n ded) th e perso n nam e d be low as its Age nt upon w hom serv ice of all n otices proce sses and all o rd e r s , de cisio n , and requir em ent s of th e D epartment o f T r ansportatio n may be made for and o n behalf of sa id carrie r , hereb y cance lin g a ll previous de s ignations of agents made by it to t he DOT. NameofAge nt

__ ___ __

**Jo ~s~**  **h~R~om~a~no~w=--- ----**  **--- --------** 
**---** Address Pi ll s bury Winthrop S h aw Pittman LLP , 2300 N S tree t, NW, W as hingto n , DC 20037 The Age n t so desig n a t ed has wri tt en hi s name a n d also hi s in iti als in the following space:



# (\1~ Name

_ __ 

# ~--- **-----**
**-- --**  **--- --**  **----**

(S ecreta ry , or othe r T itl e) On



# hi~day of October, 2014

OST F 1 0 1

0.5 ( 1 -98)
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2012________-NM-___028______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
---

EXHIBIT 99.3

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ferdi Dippenaar, Chief Executive Officer of Great Basin Gold
Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Annual Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                 

| | By:    |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| |        | /s/ Ferdi Dippenaar    
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Ferdi Dippenaar        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 30, 2012         

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 75 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 75

   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive 
 jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States district court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive 
 jurisdiction over actions arising under the immigration laws, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JURISDICTION OVER CASES ARISING UNDER THE IMMIGRATION LAWS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 85 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the immigration laws
    ``(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the district 
court for the District of Columbia shall have exclusive jurisdiction 
over--
            ``(1) any case arising under the immigration laws (as such 
        term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.)); or
            ``(2) any claim brought by any foreign national challenging 
        an order of removal from the United States or any other action 
        authorized under the Immigration and Nationality Act.''.
    (b) Table of Sections.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 84 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following:

``1370. Jurisdiction over cases arising under the immigration laws.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### CONTAINER CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. STATE BANK OF JACKSONVILLE, a Florida banking corporation, Fred S. Conrad Construction Company, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 2473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 12, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephen Smith, Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 243]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered March 14, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to seek appellate review of the denial of his motion for a severance *(see, People v Baez,*205 AD2d 695). Those issues raised by the defendant in his supplemental pro se brief are similarly foreclosed *(see, People v Hansen,*95 NY2d 227). Ritter, Acting P.J., Smith, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.
259 La. 807

#### Douglas S. CARR v. PELICAN REMODELERS, INC.

No. 51676.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: Pelican Remodelers, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 250 So.2d 220.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
---

April 9th, 2007

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the
      "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 
|    | Consent of Expert                          

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Annual Report) to
be filed by the Company with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report incorporates by reference the Annual
Information Form of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006.

I hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with
reference to my involvement in the preparation of a technical report entitled
Summary Report for the Ivanhoe Project, Elko County, Nevada, USA" dated April
2002 (the "Technical Report") and to references to the Technical Report, or
portions thereof, in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual
Report.

Yours truly,

/s/ James A. Currie

James A. Currie, P.Eng.

---
#### Armand J. REY v. Robert E. CUCCIA d/b/a Trade Ville Camper Sales and Yellowstone, Inc.

No. 54195.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1974.

In re: Armand J. Rey applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 284 So.2d 66.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

MARCUS, J. recused.