alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            9,532
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          35,413
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            36,038
<EQUITIES>                                     23,184
<MORTGAGE>                                        405
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   1,659
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 75,390
<CASH>                                            147
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             12,488
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          4,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 98,219
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                18,558
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            10,398
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 19,447
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           1,842
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        2,340
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   98,219
<PREMIUMS>                                     26,654
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             3,935
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              1,839
<OTHER-INCOME>                                    582
<BENEFITS>                                     19,677
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     4,721
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            6,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                      265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,356
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,356
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .58
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Versant Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry Wong, as Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/JERRY WONGJerry Wong Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
OfficerJanuary 29, 2008 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David Scott JOHNSON.

No. 59898.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 14, 1977.

James Brodtmann, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Vincent Paciera, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed,
#### Jerry Gerald CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-353.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 9, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; William Clayton Johnson Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1,863,279
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,303,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                        104,309
<INVENTORY>                                       7,214,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 17,085,477
<PP&E>                                           85,921,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                   33,793,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   99,585,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12,552,320
<BONDS>                                          30,192,773
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                          1,175,261
<OTHER-SE>                                       53,316,136
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     99,585,468
<SALES>                                           7,128,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13,322,191
<CGS>                                             6,966,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5,549,722
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  744,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      60,999
<INCOME-TAX>                                         67,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (388,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (388,145)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.58)



</TABLE>
#### Wendell P. SHELTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary L. SHELTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 13398.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Dec. 5, 1977.

Blackwell, Chambliss, Hobbs & Henry by Sam 0. Henry, III, West Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

Voelker, Ragland, Brackin & Crigler by James C. Crigler, Jr., Lake Providence, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before PRICE, HALL and MARVIN, JJ.

MARVIN, Judge.

The defendant appeals from a judgment ordering specific performance of his verbal *1084obligation to incorporate a business with his brother, the plaintiff. The issues are factual. They were resolved below in favor of plaintiff and we find no manifest error.

In summary, defendant desired to purchase and operate the Office Lounge in Monroe, the owner of which required a $15,-000 down payment. Defendant was unable to borrow the down payment without a guarantor. Plaintiff agreed to personally guarantee the bank loan for the down payment on the conditions that the business be incorporated with plaintiff and his wife owning 25 percent of the corporate stock and defendant and his wife owning the remainder and that these four persons would comprise the board of directors of the corporation.

Defendant contends he never agreed to the exact terms and specifics under which the business would be incorporated. Finding otherwise, the lower court observed:

> “Testimony shows that the parties had agreed that the corporation would be controlled by a board of four directors composed of themselves and their wives . The proposed Articles . . . were presented to [defendant] and his wife at . 11:00 a.m. . “It was agreed that these were to be examined and signed that same afternoon at . 4:00 p.m. in the lawyer’s office in Monroe. . . . [Defendant] then proceeded to obtain [plaintiff’s] obligation to secure the . . . indebtedness. . . . [A]round 3:30 p.m., [defendant] did not question the terms or the contents of the Articles of Incorporation; instead, he insisted he was now ‘in the driver’s seat’ and . . . was not obligated to incorporate under any terms whatsoever if he did not care to do so.”

The record supports the conclusions of the lower court. Under these circumstances, the assets of the Office Lounge, acquired individually by the defendant from the seller, are legally deemed to be the property of the corporation. *Sentell*v. *Richardson,*211 La. 288, 29 So.2d 852 (1947). Answering defendant’s appeal, plaintiff contends the judgment should be amended to order specific performance under this principle of law. We agree. Other portions of the judgment, which ordered plaintiff to cosign the note representing the credit portion of the sale price of the lounge in further performance of the verbal agreement between the litigants, were not complained of by either litigant.

Accordingly, judgment is amended to order defendant to execute all instruments necessary to transfer legal title to the corporation of all assets conveyed to the defendant individually by the credit sale, and at appellant’s cost, the judgment, as amended, is

AFFIRMED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134365 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134365 

 COA: 275948 

Bay CC: 02-001071-FH 

DONALD THOMAS PATTERSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               |  |  |  |  |
| Ohio                                          |   | 000-24498 |   | 65-0190407 |
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation) |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |

|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |  |
| 325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio | 43215 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)               | (Zip Code) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

----

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |  |
| By Investment Vehicle  |
| Proprietary funds      | $ | 13,966 |  |
| Sub-advised funds      | 1,398 |  |
| Institutional accounts | 4,405 |  |
| Total                  | $ | 19,769 |  |

|                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |  |  |  |
| By Investment Strategy                              |
| Small Cap                                           | $ | 1,842 |  |
| Small-Mid Cap                                       | 3,467 |  |
| Large Cap                                           | 8,682 |  |
| Select (All Cap)                                    | 413 |  |
| Long-Short                                          | 4,693 |  |
| Corporate bonds                                     | 600 |  |
| Core fixed income                                   | 266 |  |
|   (Less: Investments in affiliated funds) | (194 | ) |
| Total                                               | $ | 19,769 |  |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | February 2, 2017 | By: |   | /s/ Thomas E. Line |
|   |   |   |   | Thomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                     FIRST OF MICHIGAN CAPITAL CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For the Three Months Ended
                                             --------------------------
                                    December 31, 1996           December 29, 1995
                                    -----------------           -----------------
                                 Primary     Fully Diluted   Primary     Fully Diluted
                                 -------     -------------   -------     -------------
<S>                           <C>          <C>          <C>            <C>
Weighted average shares
  outstanding:
   Common shares                2,627,681     2,627,681     2,751,910     2,751,910
   Dilutive shares available
     under stock option plans       1,635          (363)        2,926         2,533

Weighted average common shares
  and common stock equivalents
                                ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
  outstanding                   2,629,316     2,627,318     2,754,836     2,754,443
                                =========     =========     =========     =========
Net earnings applicable to
  common shares               $ 1,044,025  $  1,044,025  $    416,331  $    416,331
                                =========     =========     =========     =========
Earnings per share            $       .40  $        .40  $        .15  $        .15
                                =========     =========     =========     =========
</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 01, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 01, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0401. QUAVERIS MIMS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

20CG0344
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodicreport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in theperiodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the issuer.

 

 
| Date: February 17,  2009 | Garry P. Herdler              |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                          | Garry P. Herdler              |
|                          | Executive Vice President  and |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer       |

 

----
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7664 

To permit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to deem 

certain nonprofit organizations serving developmentally disabled individuals as eligible to participate in the paycheck protection program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2020 

Mrs. WALORSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To permit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to deem certain nonprofit organizations serving 

developmentally disabled individuals as eligible to participate in the paycheck protection program, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7664 IH

1 SECTION 1. PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM ELIGI2 BILITY FOR CERTAIN NONPROFIT ORGANIZA3 TIONS SERVING DEVELOPMENTALLY DIS4 ABLED INDIVIDUALS. 

5 Section 7(a)(36)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 

6 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(D)) is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(vii) NONPROFITS SERVING CERTAIN

9 DISABLED INDIVIDUALS.— 

10 ‘‘(I) SIZE STANDARD WAIVER.— 

11 For the purposes of determining 

12 whether a covered nonprofit organiza13 tion is eligible to receive a covered 

14 loan, the Administrator may deem 

15 such organization as employing not 

16 more than the size standard in num17 ber of employees established by the 

18 Administration for the industry in 

19 which such organization operates or, 

20 if no such size standard is applicable, 

21 not more than 500 employees. 

22 ‘‘(II) REVENUE NOT BASIS FOR

23 INELIGIBILITY.—A covered nonprofit 

24 organization may not be determined 

25 to be ineligible for a covered loan due 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7664 IH

1 to the annual gross receipts of such 

2 organization. 

3 ‘‘(III) COVERED NONPROFIT OR4 GANIZATION DEFINED.—In this 

5 clause, the term ‘covered nonprofit or6 ganization’ means a nonprofit organi7 zation that— 

8 ‘‘(aa) that provides home 

9 and community-based services (as 

10 referred to in section 1915(c)(1) 

11 of the Social Security Act (42 

12 U.S.C. 1396n(c)(1))) to individ13 uals with developmental disabil14 ities (as defined in section 102(8) 

15 of the Developmental Disabilities 

16 Assistance and Bill of Rights Act 

17 of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 15002(8))); 

18 and 

19 ‘‘(bb) whose annual gross 

20 receipts do not exceed 

21 $30,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            80,699
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           4
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 110,677
<CASH>                                           1,828
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,758
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          36,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,916
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 56,313
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                136
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  38,442
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            5,008
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 69,841
<COMMON>                                         1,169
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,916
<PREMIUMS>                                      33,016
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              5,682
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   2,429
<BENEFITS>                                      15,264
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,710
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            10,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,061
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,784
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.03
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON. D.C. In thematter of AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS, S.A. Under section 4l3l0(c) of the international Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act, as amended. DOT-OST-2003- 15092



### MOTION OFAEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS FOR AN ORDEREXTENDING THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION OF THE JOINT COMPLAINANTS On March 2, 2011, the Joint Complainants made a motion for an order requiring distribution of the escrow funds. The Joint Complainants kindly agreed to an extension of time fromMarch 11, 2011 toApril 5, 2011 to respond to themotion. Under the circumstances, Aerolineasmoves to change the March 11 date toApril 5, 2011.

1

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I herebycertifythat I have this date served the forgoing document bye-mail on the following persons. jeffrey:manley@united.com carl.nelson@aa.com celfelts@fedx.com d.fisher@kellydrye.com

2 JohnN. Romans March 10, 2011