alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Malik B. RADWAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-829.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 13, 1973.

*86Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, Malik B. Radwan, in pro. per. for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On July 13, 1972, an information was filed charging appellant, Malik B. Radwan, with unlawful sale of a certain narcotic drug, to wit: Heroin. On July 21, 1972, appellant, represented by an assistant public defender, waived arraignment and entered a plea of not guilty. On September 20, 1972, this action was tried and appellant was found guilty by a jury of the offense charged. He was sentenced for a period of five years in the state penitentiary.

Subsequently, notice of appeal was filed to this court to review the judgment and sentence. Appellant, being represented by an assistant public defender, has filed a brief in this court in his behalf. After reviewing the facts contained in the record, the assistant public defender states in his brief that they “ . . . have examined the record for an error which might exist, and have been unable to find any which might arguably support an appeal.” Whereupon, he requested to be relieved as attorney for appellant under the rationale of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.

The record shows that the assistant public defender, on April 7, 1973, served a copy of the brief of appellant on appellant by certified mail. Further, the record discloses that the clerk of this court, on April 13, 1973, entered an order advising appellant that within 30 days, if he so desired, he could file a brief with this court submitting any matter that he deemed advisable in connection with this appeal. On April 27, 1973, this court received appellant’s response in the form of a letter.

The only significant point raised by appellant in his response, pro se, is concerning the alleged substance which he is accused of selling. Appellant claims that the alleged substance, heroin, was actually flour. The evidence presented at the trial was more than sufficient for the jury to find the appellant guilty beyond any reasonable doubt.

We have carefully examined the entire record on file here on behalf of appellant, Malik B. Radwan, including his own response filed pro se, and find nothing therein sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment and sentence. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence appealed is hereby

Affirmed.

LILES, A. C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7828 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7828

 To permit vicarious liability claims against an employer of a person 
who, under color of law, subjects another to the deprivation of rights, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2020

  Mr. Cohen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permit vicarious liability claims against an employer of a person 
who, under color of law, subjects another to the deprivation of rights, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights Enhancement and Law 
Enforcement Accountability Improvement Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. VICARIOUS LIABILITY.

    Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``Every''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) In any action brought under subsection (a), the employer of a 
law enforcement officer acting under color of any law described in such 
subsection shall be vicariously liable for the acts or omissions of the 
officer committed within the scope of employment in the same manner and 
to the same extent as a private employer is liable for the negligent 
acts of its employee under the laws of the State, Territory, or the 
District of Columbia. For purposes of this subsection, a law 
enforcement officer acting under color of law shall be deemed to be 
acting within the course and scope of employment (regardless of whether 
the act of the law enforcement officer was unconstitutional).
    ``(c) It shall not be a defense against any claim for vicarious 
liability under subsection (b) that a law enforcement officer has 
immunity in any action against the law enforcement officer under 
subsection (a). Nothing in this section shall be construed as limiting, 
providing, or extending any extant immunity to a law enforcement 
officer.
    ``(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude 
liability under any other theory of law for deprivations actionable 
under subsection (a) caused by a law enforcement officer or an employer 
of such law enforcement officer.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry Joe PHILLIPS.

No. 60756.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Larry Joe Phillips, applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. Relator’s application for writs under Nos. 60,190 and 60,305 were previously denied. An application for rehearing will not be considered from a denial of application for a writ. Rule 9, Sec. 6, Louisiana Supreme Court Rules. Moreover, writ of habeas corpus will not be granted pending an appeal. La.Code Crim. Procedure, Art. 363.
#### Kip LINTHICUM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-665.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 21, 1971.

Kip Linthicum, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. By our order of August 16, 1971, the public defender’s motion to withdraw was granted. The order or judgment appealed is affirmed.
## NUMBER 13

- 2 2

- 00 624

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ MICHELLE HERNANDEZ LEAL , Appellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 24 th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Michelle Hernandez Leal , perfected this appeal from a judgment of

conviction entered by the 24 th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas in trial court cause

numbe r 19

- 08

- 13,149A

. Appellant’s counsel has now filed a motion to permanently abate

the appeal
, based on the death of appellant, Michelle Hernandez Leal

. According to the2

motion, appellant died on March 24, 2023 , after appeal was perfected, but before this

Court issued its ma ndate. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 7.1(a)(2).
We grant appellant’s motion, and, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 7.1(a)(2), we hereby order th e appeal permanently abated

. Additionally,
appellant’s appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw as attorney of record is granted.

JAIME TIJERINA Justice
Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed on the 18th day of May , 202 3

.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

| **Name of****Subsidiary**                                                     |   | **Jurisdiction of****Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
| Actar Airforce, Inc.                                                          |   | Canada                               |
| Breas Medical AB                                                              |   | Sweden                               |
| Marquest Medical Products, Inc.                                               |   | Colorado                             |
| Sleep Services of America, Inc. (formerly, National Sleep Technologies, Inc.) |   | Pennsylvania                         |
| Stelex—The Validation Group, Inc. (formerly, The Validation Group, Inc.) |   | Pennsylvania                         |
| Vital Path, Inc.                                                              |   | Pennsylvania                         |
| Thomas Medical Products, Inc.                                                 |   | Pennsylvania                         |
| Vital Pharma, Inc.                                                            |   | Florida                              |
| Vital Signs California, Inc.                                                  |   | California                           |
| Vital Signs Limited                                                           |   | United Kingdom                       |
| Vital Signs MN, Inc.                                                          |   | Minnesota                            |
| Vital Signs Export, Inc.                                                      |   | Barbados                             |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Frederick THOMAS v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 61137.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Frederick Thomas applying for remedial writs of certiorari and habeas corpus. Parish of Rapides.

Writ denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    107,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           2,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                     925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         75,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                         1,270
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,430
<SALES>                                        102,338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,723
<CGS>                                           89,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  102,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   802
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 520
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,418
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        


</TABLE>
#### Frank L. THORNTON et al. v. Sharon MORAN et al. Sharon MORAN v. Frank L. THORNTON et al.

No. 60334.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Frank L. Thornton and Myrtis Thornton applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 348 So.2d 79.

Writ refused. The result is correct.
---

|               |              
|-------------- | -------------
|March 28, 2011 | Exhibit 99.10

VIA EDGAR

United States Securities and Exchange Commission

|Re: | Great Basin Gold Ltd. (the
      "Company")
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | Annual Report on Form 40-F                 
|    | Consent of Expert                          

This letter is provided in connection with the Company's Form
40-F annual report for the year ended December 31, 2010, and any amendments
thereto, (the Annual Report) to be filed by the Company with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The Annual Report
incorporates by reference the Annual Information Form of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2010.

I, Philip Bentley, hereby consent to the use of my name in
connection with reference to my involvement in the preparation of the following
technical report (the "Technical Report"):

- Technical Report Update on the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve
  Estimates for the Burnstone Gold Mine dated February 8, 2011; and
- Technical Report Update on the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve
  Estimates for the Hollister Gold Mine dated February 8, 2011

and to references to the Technical Reports, or portions
thereof, in the Annual Report and to the inclusion and incorporation by
reference of the information derived from the Technical Report in the Annual
Report.

I also consent to the use of my name in connection with
reference to my involvement in the preparation of the Technical Reports and to
references to the Technical Reports, or portions thereof, and to the inclusion
and incorporation by reference of the information derived from the Technical
Reports in the Companys Form F-10 Registration Statement, as amended, filed
with the SEC under File No. 333-163021.

Yours truly,

/S/ P.N.
BentleyPhilip N. Bentley, Pr.Sci.Nat

---
#### CRISPEN v. POPKIN.

No. 37990.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 213 So.2d 445.
**WINTHROP          REALTY TRUST**

**FORM          10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2007**

|   | Exhibit                32.2 |
|--------|-----------------------------|

| CERTIFICATION                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| OF                THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| In                connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty                Trust                (“the Company”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as filed                with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the                “Report”), I, Thomas C. Staples, Chief Financial Officer, certify,                pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to section                906 of                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,                that: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By: | /s/                Thomas C. Staples |
|-----|--------------------------------------|

| Name: | Thomas                C. StaplesChief                  Financial Officer |
|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| November                9, 2007 |
|---------------------------------|
#### Harold Howard MILLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 74-121.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 27, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
259 La. 683

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Bennette WILLIAMS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51596.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 17, 1971.

In re: Bennette Williams applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1397 

KA 10-00200 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JOSE PRATTS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KAREN RUSSO-MCLAUGHLIN

OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL MARION OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P.

Franczyk, J.), rendered January 15, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737). 

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549


                            FORM 8-K
                         CURRENT REPORT
             Pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d) of the
                 Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                        November 11, 1997
        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                   SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
      Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


     Delaware                     0-18048              75-2258519
(State or Other Jurisdiction    (Commission         (IRS Employer
of Incorporation)               File Number)      Identification No.)


   1600 Promenade Center, 15th Floor
           Richardson, TX                                  75080
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)                 (Zip Code)


                          (972) 690-5888
      (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

                                N/A
                       ---------------------
  (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

ITEM 5.   OTHER EVENTS.

     SA Telecommunications, Inc. issued the press release which is
attached as Exhibit 20.1 hereto on November 11, 1997, which press
release is incorporated herein by reference.  In addition, SA 
Telecommunications, Inc. issued the press release which is 
attached as Exhibit 20.2, which press release is incorporated
herein by reference.

ITEM 7.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND
          EXHIBITS.

         (c)  Exhibits.

              Exhibit No.      Document Description

                20.1*          Press Release of SA Telecommunications, Inc.
                               dated November 11, 1997

                20.2*          Press release of SA Telecommunications, Inc.
                               dated November 19, 1997

_______________
*Filed herewith

<PAGE>

                            SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                              SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

DATE:  November 20, 1997      BY:   /s/ HOWARD CURD
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Howard Curd
                                   Chairman of the Board

<PAGE>
                          EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.         DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

20.1*               Press Release of SA Telecommunications, Inc.
                    dated November 11, 1997

20.2*               Press Release of SA Telecommunications, Inc.
                    dated November 19, 1997
_________
*   Filed herewith
#### Hodges NATHAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-399.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 29, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fansteel Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, Gary L. Tessitore, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and R. Michael McEntee, as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Fansteel Inc. and will be retained
by Fansteel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated: November 11, 2005

                                        /s/ Gary L. Tessitore
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Gary L. Tessitore
                                        Chairman of the Board, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        /s/ R. Michael McEntee
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        R. Michael McEntee
                                        Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer

                                       39
```