alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Division of Advertising Practices 

Andrea C. Levine, Esq. 

Senior Vice President, Director 

National Advertising Division 

112 Madison A venue, 3rd Floor 

New York, NY 10016 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Federal Trade Commission 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

February 23, 2016 

Re: Advertising Claims for Steuart's Pain Formula 

Dear Ms. Levine: 

I am writing to follow up on your referral to the FTC of the above-mentioned matter. 

Your referral indicated that the advertiser, Steuart Laboratories, was the subject of a challenge 

involving express claims and testimonials that its product relieves pain symptoms associated 

with arthritis, diabetic neuropathy, and other conditions. Your referral also stated that the 

advertiser refused to participate in NAD's self-regulatory process. 

We contacted the principal for Steuart Laboratories, who has informed us that the 

company now intends to cooperate with NAD's inquiry. Our understanding is that a company 

representative will soon contact you to reengage in the NAD self-regulatory process. 

Accordingly, it appears that no additional FTC action is warranted at this time The 

Commission reserves the right to take such further action as the public interest may require. The 

FTC fully supports the NAD's self-regulatory process, and we appreciate your referral and the 

opportunity to continue to assist in supporting the NAD. 

Very truly yours, 

~(~ 

MaryK] gle . 

Associate Director
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00331-CV

____________________

IN RE TEXAS WINDSTORM INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, BRUSH 

COUNTRY CLAIMS, LTD, AND DAVID GUTIERREZ

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding

60th District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-183464

________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER 

Texas Windstorm Insurance Association, Brush Country Claims, LTD, and 

David Gutierrez filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The relators are defendants

in Cause No. B-183464, James v. Texas Windstorm Insurance Association, et. al.

Relators seek a writ compelling the Honorable Gary Sanderson, Judge of the 60th 

District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, to vacate his order of August 29, 2016, 

which compels the relators to produce photographs and estimates for all Hurricane 

Rita property claims within a one mile radius of the James’s property. We note our 
2

jurisdiction over this matter and the parties. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 

(West 2004). 

Relators request a stay of the trial court’s order as temporary relief. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 52.10(a). The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to prevent undue 

prejudice. It is ORDERED that the trial court’s order of August 29, 2016, in Cause 

No. B-183464 is STAYED until our Opinion issues or until further order of this 

Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of the relators as a 

condition to any relief herein granted.

The response of the real parties in interest, David James and Sue James, is 

due September 26, 2016.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED.

ORDER ENTERED September 14, 2016.

 PER CURIAM

 

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the ZAT1 VS (10) meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Institutional Research Training Grants—T32.                    

*Date:*                         July 19, 2018.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Viatcheslav A. Soldatenkov, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892,                         *soldatenkovv@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 7, 2018.

Michelle D. Trout,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2018-12673 Filed 6-12-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**WINTHROP          REALTY TRUST**

**FORM          10-Q SEPTEMBER 30, 2007**

|   | Exhibit                32.1 |
|--------|-----------------------------|

| CERTIFICATION                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| OF                THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |
|--------------------------------------------------|

| In                connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Winthrop Realty                Trust                (“the Company”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as filed                with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the                “Report”), I, Michael L. Ashner, Chief Executive Officer, certify,                pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to section                906 of                the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,                that: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By: | /s/ Michael                L. Ashner |
|-----|-------------------------------------------|

| Name: | Michael                L. AshnerChief                  Executive Officer |
|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |
|--------|

| November                9, 2007 |
|---------------------------------|
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 April 3, 2007

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of March 31, 2007, preliminary assets under management totaled
$4.169 billion.  Following is a summary as of March 31, 2007 (in millions):

				         Equity    Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts 	        $   786	      $  137       $   923
Mutual Funds (including sub-advised)      2,674	         155         2,829
Private Investment Funds	   	    417            0           417
                                        -------       ------       -------
Total			       	        $ 3,877	      $  292       $ 4,169

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small and Small-Mid Cap	         $   762
Large Cap and Select		     980
Long-Short		           2,137
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     290
				--------
Total			           4,169


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: April 3, 2007	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,978
<SECURITIES>                                    37,023
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,564
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,655
<PP&E>                                       2,228,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                 609,534
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,708,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          136,300
<BONDS>                                        819,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     505,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,708,608
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,044
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,385
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,385
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
        


</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEFAN STEWART
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1259

[ January 23, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Elizabeth Anne Scherer , Judge; L.T. Case No. 17

- 3419CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear,

Senior A ssistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, D AMOORGIAN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of the Secretary 

May 21, 2020 

Bruce Grimm 

Re: In the Matter of LendEDU, FTC File No. 182 3180 

Dear Mr. Grimm: 

Thank you for your March 9, 2020, comment regarding the above-referenced matter. 

Your comment was placed on the public record pursuant to Section 2.34 of the Commission 

Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 2.34. 

Your comment expresses support for this enforcement and recommends that it be 

accepted. We appreciate your support. 

After considering your comment, along with others received in this matter, the 

Commission has determined that the public interest would be served best by issuing the Decision 

and Order in final form without modification. A copy of the final Decision and Order and other 

relevant materials are available from the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov. 

Thank you again for your comment. The Commission is aided in its analysis by hearing 

from a variety of sources, and we appreciate your interest in this matter. 

By direction of the Commission. 

April J. Tabor 

Acting Secretary
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of R.S.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00058

- CV

Trial court case number: 16

- 1394

- F425

Trial court: 425th District Court of Williamson County

Party filing motion: Appell ant

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

___________________________  Acting for the Court

The en banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, Landau,

Goodman, Hightower, Countiss , and Adams.

Date: December 3, 2020
**Exhibit 10.40**

 

**From minutes of a meeting of the Board of Directors of**

 

**BJ Services Company held on March 22, 2001**

 

***Amendment of 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan to Reflect Stock Dividend***

 

**WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has previously reserved 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuancepursuant to awards granted or to be granted under the BJ Services Company 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Stock Purchase Plan”); and**

 

**WHEREAS, the Stock Purchase Plan provides for the adjustment of the number of shares subject to such plan in certain events, including events such asthe Stock Dividend;**

 

**NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that,effective as of the Stock Dividend Record Date, the Board of Directors of the Company authorizes and approves a total of 6,000,000 shares of Common Stock for issuance pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan; and**

 

**RESOLVED FURTHER, that, effective as of the Stock Dividend Record Date,Section 4 of the Stock Purchase Plan is amended to provide as follows:**

 

**The first sentence of Section 4 is hereby deleted and replaced with:**

 

**“Subject to the provisions of paragraph 11 (relating to adjustment upon changes in stock), the aggregate number of shares which may be soldpursuant to options granted under the Plan shall not exceed 6,000,000 shares of the authorized $.10 par value common stock of the Company (“Stock”), which shares may be unissued shares or required shares or shares bought on the market forpurposes of the Plan.”; and**

 

**RESOLVED FURTHER, that, effective asof the Stock Dividend Record Date, the “option price”, as defined in the Stock Purchase Plan, shall be determined as follows for the plan year beginning October 1, 2000: an amount equal to 85% of (I) the fair market value per share of theCommon Stock on the date of exerciseor (ii) one-half of the fair market value per share of the Common Stock on the date of Grant, whichever amount is lesser; and**

 

**RESOLVED FURTHER, that with respect to “options” currently outstanding to purchase shares of Common Stock underthe**

**Stock Purchase Plan, the number of shares of Common Stock subject to each such option shall be doubled, in order that there be two shares of Common Stocksubject to such option for each share of Common Stock subject to such option immediately before the Stock Dividend.**
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or 78o(d),      and, |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June      9, 2010 | /s/ Robert S.      Hekemian                           |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                               | Robert      S. Hekemian                               |
|                               | Chairman      of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
EXHIBIT 32.2

** **

FIRST HARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of First Hartford Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), IStuart I. Greenwald, Treasurer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.       Thereport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

/s/ Stuart I. Greenwald

Stuart I. Greenwald

Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer

 

Date: December 20, 2007
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Division of Financial Practices

April 4, 2001

Glenn A. Mitchell, Esq.
Stein, Mitchell & Mezines
100 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20036

Re: Southern Management Corporation

Dear Mr. Mitchell:

As you know, staff of the Federal Trade Commission has conducted an investigation of
your client, Southern Management Corporation (“SMC”), for possible violations of the Fair
Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether
SMC, a real estate management company, violated the FCRA by furnishing derogatory
information -- “I-9" credit ratings, which denote debts that have been charged off to profit or loss
-- to a consumer reporting agency while knowing or consciously avoiding knowing that the
information was inaccurate. 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2.

Staff has serious concerns about whether SMC’s practices violated the FCRA. From our
investigation, it appears that SMC, upon a renter’s termination of a lease with an outstanding
debt, automatically reported an I-9 rating within approximately thirty days (and sometimes fewer)
of the renter’s move-out date. In many instances, it appears that SMC failed to determine that the
debt was uncollectible -- the accounting basis for charging it off -- before using the I-9 rating,
even though less derogatory ratings indicating that the debt was overdue but not yet uncollectible
were available and may have been more accurate. The I-9 rating is the most adverse credit rating
available, and its presence on a credit report can contribute to a creditor’s decision to deny credit
to a consumer.

Despite our concems, we have determined to close the investigation at this time. It
appears that SMC reported the I-9 ratings for only a very short period of time. This action to
close the investigation should not be construed as a determination that a law violation did not


occur, in the same way that the pendency of an investigation should not be construed as a
determination that a violation did occur. The Commission reserves the right to take such further
action as the public interest may require.

_—
16d C. Winston

Acting Associate Director
U
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mtniteb ~tate~ (!Court of §ppeaI~

for tbe jfeberaI QCircuit

DONALD D. GNADER, JR.,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS

AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

2012-7153

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims in case no. 11-1686, Judge Alan G.

Lance, Sr.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The court treats the various motions to stay proceedings as a motion for an extension of time for the appellant

to file his opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

Case: 12-7153 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 10/10/2012
DONALD GNADER, JR. v. SHINSEKI 2

The motion is granted. The appellant's opening brief

is due within 30 days of the date of this order.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s26

Case: 12-7153 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 10/10/2012