alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                             649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          78,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,826)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,251
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         48,020
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,314
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,251
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,733
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,696
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,688
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,688
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.72
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  APR-04-1998
<CASH>                          6,359,000
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                  20,269,000
<ALLOWANCES>                      326,000
<INVENTORY>                    11,616,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               40,896,000
<PP&E>                         55,609,000
<DEPRECIATION>                 37,799,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 61,534,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          17,315,000
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                          552,000
<OTHER-SE>                     40,123,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   61,534,000
<SALES>                        31,989,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               31,989,000
<CGS>                          23,783,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  23,783,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                5,214,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 36,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,956,000
<INCOME-TAX>                    1,038,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,918,000
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,918,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.23
        

</TABLE>
-

r-AA - 201ft -()C? II

AD ECONOMIC EVALVA nON

Docket Number:

Airplane Make/Model/Series:

Number of airplanes (U.S. Operators):

2002-NM-12-AD

Boeing Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600, -700,

-700C, -800, -900; 747-400; 757; 767; and 777

1,882

The Airworthiness Directive (AD) requires: modifying the static inverter by relocating

resistor Rl70 of the static inverter bridge assembly.

Costs: Manufacturer warranty remedies are available for the cost of modified replacement parts

and labor associated with accomplishing the actions specified by this proposed AD.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibilitv Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

It is possible that this AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Are regulatory distinctions

appropriate to accommodate the extent to which Alaska is not served by transportation modes

other than aviation~

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Project Engineer/Office Routing Symbol: Binh V. Tran/ANM-130S
Diamond Hill
                                ------------
                                Investments



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
       					Investor Contact:
       					James F. Laird
					Chief Financial Officer
					614-255-3353
					E-mail: (jlaird@diamond-hill.com)


DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENTS CEO FILES SCHEDULE 13D


	Columbus, Ohio - March 5, 2007 - Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(NASDAQ:DHIL), today announced that CEO R. H. Dillon filed Schedule 13D
indicating ownership of 141,364 shares of the company's common stock.  Mr.
Dillon is the largest shareholder of the company as his ownership represents
6.8% of the total shares outstanding.  In February Mr. Dillon exercised the
balance of his vested stock warrants which were granted upon his hiring in
May 2000.  As a result of this and previous transactions the company will take
a tax deduction of $18.3 million but under generally accepted accounting
principles there will be $0 expense in the financial statements.

The company's employees, officers and directors in total own 511,000 shares
representing 24% of the 2,090,000 total shares outstanding.  On a fully-diluted
basis inside ownership totals 734,000 shares representing 31% of fully diluted
shares outstanding of 2,361,000.

About Diamond Hill:
       Diamond Hill provides investment management services to institutions and
financial intermediaries seeking to preserve and build wealth. The firm
currently manages mutual funds, separate accounts and private investment funds.
For more information on Diamond Hill, visit www.diamond-hill.com.

				###

	325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215
			614-255-3333  fax 614-255-3363
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FIRST
MARYLAND BANCORP SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         988,890
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,378
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                25,663
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                72,372
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,334,734
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     10,358,539
<ALLOWANCE>                                    158,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,340,496
<DEPOSITS>                                  11,725,713
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,230,948
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            700,678
<LONG-TERM>                                    656,198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            8,002
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                        85,395
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,891,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              17,340,496
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                594,349
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              189,232
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                23,712
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               807,293
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             297,592
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             401,377
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          405,916
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   16,930
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              41,395
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                451,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                290,485
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     183,206
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   183,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.81
<LOANS-NON>                                     80,367
<LOANS-PAST>                                    27,436
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    93
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 89,577
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               168,186
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   25,459
<RECOVERIES>                                     6,029
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              158,836
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            57,590
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             21,313
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         79,933
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

 Office of the Secretary 

 

 

April 20, 2020 

Commenter Channbory Vann 

\ 

Re: In re FXI Holdings Inc. and Innocor, Inc., Matter No. 191 0087, Docket No. C-4708 

Dear Commenter Vann: 

 Thank you for the comment that you submitted electronically in connection with the 

Commission’s proposed Complaint and Decision and Order in In the Matter of FXI/Innocor, 

FTC File No. 191-0087. The Commission received your comment during the public comment 

period, and this letter responds to the point you raised. 

After careful review of your comment, the Commission has determined that the public 

interest is served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form. The Commission placed your 

comment on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. §4.9(b)(6)(ii). Other relevant materials, including a copy of the final Decision 

and Order, are available from the Commission’s website at: http://www.ftc.gov. 

It assists the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work on 

antitrust and consumer protection issues. Thank you for your interest in this matter. 

By direction of the Commission. 

April Tabor 

Acting Secretary
#### Isabella S. TRACY, Appellant, v. KWIK CHEK SUPERMARKETS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-926.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 11, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT32.2

** **

FIRSTHARTFORD CORPORATION

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First HartfordCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Stuart I. Greenwald,Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.         The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.         The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

                    Stuart I. Greenwald                   

Stuart I. Greenwald

Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer

 

Date: October 19, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                          1,479,022
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     169,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,666,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,472,883
<PP&E>                                          1,044,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                    653,387
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,351,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             571,370
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           50,353
<OTHER-SE>                                     19,501,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    5,351,667
<SALES>                                         1,209,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,263,820
<CGS>                                             386,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     386,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,144,351
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,266,930)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,266,930)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,266,930)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.26)




</TABLE>
#### STERLING HOTEL CO., Inc., Appellant, v. Mildred K. SIMON, Appellee.

No. 70-344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
258 La. 213

#### Kenneth C. BOYTER v. Bobby Gene WATSON.

No. 51261.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 24, 1971.

In re: Kenneth C. Boyter applying for writs of mandamus, certiorari and prohibition.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. There is no irreparable injury and relator has an adequate remedy by moving to set the case for trial.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                     626,943,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      27,326,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           127,861,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            20,474,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>              1,857,240,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                   2,434,760,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                     2,444,000,000
<LOANS>                                 15,149,584,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                195,941,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          21,214,942,000
<DEPOSITS>                              16,824,389,000
<SHORT-TERM>                             1,908,574,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        245,238,000
<LONG-TERM>                                419,513,000
<COMMON>                                    85,452,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,731,776,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          21,214,942,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            640,140,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          141,669,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            11,451,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           793,260,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         331,964,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         391,192,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      402,068,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                               20,557,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             501,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            290,032,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            215,127,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 215,127,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               143,735,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.32
<LOANS-NON>                                 85,049,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                21,612,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             5,644,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           175,548,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               27,026,000
<RECOVERIES>                                13,108,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          195,941,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                    195,941,000
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Howard R.Levine, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Family DollarStores, Inc., (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

·                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 2, 2007,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

·                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  July 11, 2007
| /s/ Howard R. Levine |                                                                                   |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Howard R. Levine                                                                       |
|                 | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                      |                                                                                        |  |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Family DollarStores, Inc., and will be retained by Family Dollar Stores, Inc., and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
SERVED: AUGUST 9, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

COLGAN AIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09EA0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2009-0582 

NOTICE OF PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

Based on the joint request of the parties who indicated they will be unavailable on 

August 24, 2010, the Prehearing Telephone Conference is re-scheduled for September 13, 2010, 

at 3 p.m.. Eastern Time. 

All parties should be prepared to discuss all issues and facts at issue. All documents that 

have been exchanged and that have not already been provided to the Judge should be furnished 

to him by August 30, 2010. 

Pursuant to Section 556 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 556(c)(8), each 

party shall be represented by someone who has authority to negotiate concerning resolution of all 

issues in controversy. 

SO ORDERED. 

Connie A 

Chief Administr^ivel^aw Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09EA0018 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Mark A. Dombroff, Respondent's Counsel 

DOMBROFF GILMORE JAQUES & FRENCH, P.C. 

1676 International Drive - Penthouse 

McLean, VA 22102 

TEL: 703-336-8700 

FAX: 703-336-8750 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, EAL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room El 2-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL:-202-3^6-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

5 

i 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2WI0OO, 

Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

•i 

-2-
Time to Open our Eyes!

Markus Jakobssonmarkus.jakobsson@parc.com

We measure so we can react!

Measure need for education 

(and normalize based on your losses)

Measure perceived need for education

(hard educate when no perceived need)

Measure awareness of problems

(awareness campaigns cheaper than education)

Consider cost/benefit of campaigns

(this maximizes impact - but requires insight!)

Often, educational efforts are not designed in a scientific manner. This needs to be changed. 

First, we need to establish the need for education for various topics.

Second, we identify what people are worried about. It is harder to educate people who think they do not need it.

Third, we identify the degree of awareness of various problems. Sometimes, awareness is all that is needed.

And *then* we are ready to decide how to design campaigns!

Know whom to ask!
        - Are you concerned about lottery fraud?
        - Typical victim: “little-old-lady”
        - Are you concerned about a criminal getting access to your friend’s myspace account and then sending you a message “I am in London, and got robbed. Can you wire me $100 today?”
        - Typical victim: 20-something

First of all, we need to collect data about people.

When performing experiments or surveys, the demographics matter! 

Know how to ask!
        - Online crime is rampant. Based on your own experience with online fraud, do you think that users like you might lose money to online criminals?
        - 9.2% say “Yes, as recent as in the past year”
        - Have you been a victim of online fraud?
        - 2.1% say “Yes, I was tricked last year.” 

If you rely on surveys for collection of data, then it matters how you ask! (Even for anonymous subjects you will never meet.)

Note: there were several choices, giving various time intervals, and an option that indicated no losses.

Know whether to ask!
        - “Would you have fallen for this?” 

	... does not work!
        - Sting experiment (example: “Social Phishing” by Jakobsson and others) 

	will tell the truth! 

Sometimes, surveys are just not suitable, and you need to perform sting experiments (or “naturalistic phishing experiments”)

Educational strategies

Old-school: 

Observe incidents. 

Show users screen shots of attacks.

Needed approach:

Develop hypotheses. 

Measure problem (the right way)

Select messaging approach wisely.

Questions? markus.jakobsson@parc.com

Summary of what people have done so far, and what needs to be done.