2005 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 6-2-2005 

# U SA v . Geddes P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 03-2802

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2005 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . Ge dde s " (2005). 2005 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1077. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2005/1077UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N o. 03- 2802 UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v. AA RO N G EDD ES O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt

fort he D i s t r i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . N o. 02- cr - 00705) D i s t r i ctJ udge: T he H onor abl e M aryL . C ooper O n R em an d fro m the U n it ed S tat es S u p rem e C o u rt

( S. C t . N o. 04- 6264)

B efor e: SL O V I T E R and FU E N T E S, C i r cui tJ udges , and PO L L A K , D i s t r i ctJ udge

OR DER

_______ A ppel l ant ’ s pet i t i on forpanel r ehea r i ng i s gr ant ed. T he C our t ’ s O r derof A pr i l 6, 2 0 0 5 is h e re b yv a c a te d . A p p e llan t w a s c o n v icte d o f p o ss e ss io n o f

a w e a p o n b ya c o n v icte d f e lo n in vi ol at i on of 18 U . S. C . §922( g) ( 1) . H e w as s ent ence d t o a t er m of i m pr i s onm entof 110 m o n th s . W e a f

f ir m e d th e c o n v ic tio n a n d s e n te n c e b yo p in io n f ile d J u n e 2 , 2 0 0 4 . A ppel l antpet i t i oned the U ni t ed St at e Supr eme C our tfora w r i tof ce r t i or ar i w hi ch w asg ran ted b yo rde r en tered Jan u ary2 4 , 2 0 0 5 . T h e C o u rtv ac ated the ju d g m en t of this C o u rt and r emanded forfur t hercons i der at i on i n l i ghtof U ni t ed Stat es v. B ooker , 5 4 3 U .S . , 1 2 5 S .C t. 7 3 8 (2 0 0 5 ). U pon fur t hercons i der at i on, w e r eaf fi r m ourpr i ordeci s i on w i t h r es pectt o t he j udgm entof convi ct i on. A ppel l anthas r eques t ed thatw e r emand t he mat t ert o t he D i s t r i ctC our tforr es ent enci ng i n l i ghtof B ooker . W e have det er m i ned thatt he sent encing i ssues A pp el l ant r ai ses ar e best determ i ned byt he D i stri ctC ou rti n the fi rs t i ns t ance . A ccor di ngl y , w e w i l l vaca t e the j udgm entof s ent ence and r emand for r econs i der at i on and, i f t hatC our tdeems i tappr opr i at e, forr es ent enci ng i n acc or dance w i t h B ooker . BY THE C OU RT: / s /J ul i o M . Fuent es C i r cui tJ udge D at ed: J une 2, 2005 ARL/ c c : J S F ; GSL ; DBL; RS