Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 1 1/31/07 ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

CLASS I AIR QUALITY CONTROL PERMIT

COMPANY: Phoenix Cement Company
FACILITY: Portland Cement Plant
PERMIT NO: 35426
DATE ISSUED: January 31, 2007
EXPIRY DATE: January 31, 2012

SUMMARY

This permit is a significant revision of the Title V Air Quality Control Permit (AQCP) No. 1001785 issued on June 26, 2002 to Phoenix Cement Company (PCC), the Perm ittee, for the operation of its Portland cement plant and quarry at 3000 West Cement Plant Road in Clarkdale, Arizona. The purpose of this significant revision is to include into the Title V permit, the e quipment associated with Kiln 4 modern ization project requested by PCC in its application for Permit No. 1001717, which was s ubsequently issued on February 26, 2002. The modernization brought forth primarily the installation a nd operation of a five-stage, suspension pre-heater with in-line calciner (ILC), rotary kiln, in-line raw mill/coal mill, clinker cooler, Onoda-Kobe (OK) finish mill, and clinker storage domes. To prevent triggering the Prev ention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements, PCC has voluntarily accepted the emission limits and emissions caps listed below:

Facility-wide Emission Limits (rolling 12-month total):

PM: 773 tons per year

PM 10 : 460 tons per year
SO 2 : 401 tons per year NOx: 3,271 tons per year CO: 764 tons per year VOC: 41.5 tons per year

Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill Emission Limits (rolling 12-month total):

NOx: 3,240 tons per year CO: 698 tons per year
SO 2 : 400 tons per year

Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill Emission Limits (rolling 8-hour average):

CO: 2.0 pounds per ton of clinker (lb/ton)

Quarry Explosives Usage:

913 tons per year (rolling 12-month total), 70 to ns per calendar day, and 10 tons per hour

The Permit is issued in accordance wi th Title 49, Chapter 3 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. All definitions, terms, and conditions used in the Permit conform to those in the Arizona Administrative Code R18-2-101 et. seq. (A.A.C.) and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), except as otherwise defined in the Permit. All terms and conditions in the Permit are enforceable by the Admi nistrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Issuance of the Permit voids and supersedes all previously issued operating permits.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 2 1/31/07 TABLE OF CONTENTS

ATTACHMENT “A”: GE NERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................ ..... 3

I. PERMIT EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL ......................................................................................... 3

II. COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 3

III. PERMIT REVISION, REOPENING, REVOCATION AND REISSUANCE,
OR TERMINATI ON FOR CAUSE ..................................................................................................... . 3

IV. POSTING OF PERMIT ............................................................................................................. ........... 4

V. FEE PAYMENT ................................................................................................................... ................ 4

VI. ANNUAL EMISSION INVENTORY QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................. 4

VII. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION ...................................................................................................... 4

VIII. CERTIFICATION OF TRUTH, ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS ........................................... 5

IX. INSPECTION AND ENTRY .......................................................................................................... ...... 5

X. PERMIT REVISION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL HAZARDOUS
AIR POLLUTANT STANDARD ....................................................................................................... .. 5

XI. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PROGRAM .............................................................................................. 6

XII. EXCESS EMISSIONS, PERMIT DEVIATIONS, AND EMERGENCY REPORTING .................... 6

XIII. RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. 9

XIV. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................... 10

XV. DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION ............................................................................................ 10

XVI. PERMIT AMENDMENT OR REVISION ......................................................................................... 10

XVII. FACILITY CHANGE WITHOUT A PERMIT REVISION .............................................................. 10

XVIII. TESTING REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................................... .. 11

XIX. PROPERTY RIGHTS ............................................................................................................... .......... 12

XX. SEVERABILIT Y CLAUSE ........................................................................................................... ..... 13

XXI. PERMIT SHIELD ................................................................................................................. .............. 13

XXII. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE .............................................................................. 13
ATTACHMENT “B”: SPE CIFIC CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... .... 14

I. GENERAL REQUI REMENTS .......................................................................................................... 14

II. FACILITY-WIDE OPERATIONS GOVERNED BY VOLUNTARILY
ACCEPTED PROVISIONS .......................................................................................................... ...... 15

III. PORTLAND CEMENT OPERATIONS GOVERNED BY MAXIMUM AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (M ACT) STANDARDS ...................................................................... 20

IV. QUARRY AND RAW MATERIAL CRUSHING ............................................................................. 33

V. COAL PREPARATION OPERATIONS ............................................................................................ 40

VI. COOLING TOWERS AND OTHER UNCLASSIFIED POINT SOURCES .................................... 45

VII. FUGITIVE DUST SOURCES ......................................................................................................... ... 47

VIII. OTHER PERIODIC ACTIVITIES ..................................................................................................... 49

IX. AMBIENT MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................ 52 ATTACHMENT “C”: EQUIPMENT LIST ................................................................................................ ......... 57

TABLE C-1: PROCESS EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................. .......... 57
TABLE C-2: CONT ROL DEVICE ..................................................................................................... .............. 66
ATTACHMENT “D”: DUST CONTROL PLAN ............................................................................................. ... 68

I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. ............. 68

II. CONTROL PLAN .................................................................................................................. ............ 68

III. MONITORING .................................................................................................................... ............... 69
ATTACHMENT “E”: OPERATI ON AND MAINTENANCE PLAN ................................................................ 70Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 3 1/31/07 

## ATTACHMENT “A”: GENERAL PROVISIONS

Air Quality Control Permit No. 35426

For Phoenix Cement Company

I. PERMIT EXPIRATION AND RENEWAL [ARS §49-426.F, A.A.C. R18-2-304.C.2, and -306.A.1]

A. This permit is valid for a period of fi ve years from the date of issuance.

B. The Permittee shall submit an application for renewal of this permit at leas t 6 months, but not more than 18 months, prior to the date of permit expiration.

II. COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT CONDITIONS [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.8.a and b]

A. The Permittee shall comply with all conditions of this permit including all applicable requirements of the Arizona air quality statutes and air quality rules. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a
violation of the Arizona Revised Statutes and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or revision; or for denial of a permit renewal application. In addition, noncompliance with any federally enfo rceable requirement constitutes a violation of
the Clean Air Act.

B. It shall not be a defense for a Permittee in an en forcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.

III. PERMIT REVISION, REOPENING, REVOCATION AND REISSUANCE, OR
TERMINATION FOR CAUSE [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.8.c, -321.A.1, and -321.A.2]

A. The permit may be revised, reopened, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the Permittee for a permit revision, re vocation and reissuance, termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.

B. The permit shall be reopened and revised un der any of the following circumstances

1. Additional applicable requirements under the Clean Air Act become applicable to the Class I source. Such a reopening shall only occur if th ere are three or more years remaining in the permit term. The reopening sha ll be completed no later than 18 months after promulgation of the applicable requirement. No such reopening is required if the effective date of the requirement is later than the date on which th e permit is due to expire, unless an application for renewal has been submitted pursuant to A. A.C. R18-2-322.B. Any permit revision required pursuant to this subparagraph shall comp ly with the provisions in A.A.C. R18-2-322 for permit renewal and shall reset the five-year permit term.

2. Additional requirements, including excess emissions requirements, become applicable to an affected source under the acid rain program. U pon approval by the Administrator, excess emissions offset plans shall be deemed to be incorporated into the Class I permit.

3. The Director or the Administrator determines that the permit contains a material mistake or
that inaccurate statements were made in establis hing the emissions standards or other terms or conditions of the permit.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 4 1/31/07 4. The Director or the Administrator determines that the permit needs to be revised or revoked to assure compliance with the applicable requirements.

C. Proceedings to reopen and reissue a permit, including appeal of any final action relating to a permit reopening, shall follow the same procedures as appl y to initial permit issuance and shall, except for reopenings under Condition III.B.1 above, affect only those parts of the permit for which cause to reopen exists. Such reopenings shall be made as expeditiously as practicable. Permit reopenings
for reasons other than those stated in Condition III.B.1 above shall not result in a resetting of the five-year permit term.

IV. POSTING OF PERMIT [A.A.C. R18-2-315]

A. The Permittee shall post this permit or a certificate of permit issuance where the facility is located in such a manner as to be clearly visible and accessibl e. All equipment covered by this permit shall be clearly marked with one of the following:

1. Current permit number; or

2. Serial number or other equipment ID number that is also listed in the permit to identify that piece of equipment

B. A copy of the complete perm it shall be kept on site.

V. FEE PAYMENT [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.9 and -326]

The Permittee shall pay fees to the Director pursu ant to ARS §49-426(E) and A.A.C. R18-2-326.

VI. ANNUAL EMISSION INVENTORY QUESTIONNAIRE [A.A.C. R18-2-327.A and B]

A. The Permittee shall complete and submit to th e Director an annual emissions inventory questionnaire. The questionnaire is due by March 31s t or ninety days after the Director makes the inventory form available each year, whichever occu rs later, and shall incl ude emission information for the previous calendar year.

B. The questionnaire shall be on a form provided by the Director and shall include the information required by A.A.C. R18-2-327.

VII. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION [A.A.C. R18-2-309.2.a, -309.2.c-d, and -309.5.d]

A. The Permittee shall submit a compliance certific ation to the Director semiannually, which describes the compliance status of the source with respect to each permit condition. The first certification shall be submitted no later than May 15 th, and shall report the compliance status of the source during the period between October 1st of th e previous year and March 31st of the current year. The second certification shall be submitted no la ter than November 15th, and shall report the compliance status of the source during the peri od between April 1st and September 30th of the
current year.

The compliance certifications shall include the following:

1. Identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification;

2. Identification of the methods or other means used by the Permittee for determining the compliance status with each term and condition during the certification period;

3. The status of compliance with the terms and c onditions of the permit for the period covered byFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 5 1/31/07 the certification, including whether complia nce during the period was continuous or intermittent; The certification shall be b ased on the methods and means designated in
Condition VII.A.2 above. The certifications sh all identify each deviation and take into account for consideration in the compliance certification;

4. For emission units subject to 40 CFR Part 64, the certification shall also identify as possible exceptions to compliance any period during whic h compliance is required and in which an excursion or exceedance defined under 40 CFR Part 64 occurred;

5. All instances of deviations from permit require ments reported pursuant to Condition XII.B of this Attachment; and

6. Other facts the Director may require to dete rmine the compliance status of the source.

B. A copy of all compliance certifications shall also be submitted to the EPA Administrator.

C. If any outstanding compliance schedule exists, a progress report shall be submitted with the semiannual compliance certifications re quired in Condition VII.A above.

VIII. CERTIFICATION OF TRUTH, ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS [A.A.C. R18-2-304.H]

Any document required to be submitted by this permit, including reports, shall contain a certification by a responsible official of truth, accuracy, and comple teness. This certification shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry , the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete.

IX. INSPECTION AND ENTRY [A.A.C. R18-2-309.4]

A. Upon presentation of proper credentials, the Permitt ee shall allow the Director or the authorized representative of the Director to:

B. Enter upon the Permittee’s premises where a sour ce is located, emissions-related activity is conducted, or where records are required to be kept under the conditions of the permit;

C. Have access to and copy, at re asonable times, any records that are required to be kept under the conditions of the permit;

D. Inspect, at reasonable times, any facilities, e quipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under the permit;

E. Sample or monitor, at reasonable times, substa nces or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with the permit or other applicable requirements; and

F. Record any inspection by use of written, electronic, magnetic and photographic media.

X. PERMIT REVISION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT
STANDARD [A.A.C. R18-2-304.C]

If this source becomes subject to a standard prom ulgated by the Administrator pursuant to Section 112(d) of the Act, then the Permittee shall, within tw elve months of the date on which the standard is promulgated, submit an application for a permit revision demonstrating how the source will comply
with the standard.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 6 1/31/07 XI. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE PROGRAM [40 CFR Part 68]

If this source becomes subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 68, then the Permittee shall comply with these provisions according to the time line specified in 40 CFR Part 68.

XII. EXCESS EMISSIONS, PERMIT DEVIATIONS, AND EMERGENCY REPORTING

A. Excess Emissions Reporting [A.A.C. R18-2-310.01.A and -310.01.B]

1. Excess emissions shall be reported as follows:

a. The Permittee shall report to the Director any emissions in excess of the limits established by this permit. Such report shall be in two parts as specified below:

(1) Notification by telephone or facsimile within 24 hours of the time when the
Permittee first learned of the occurrence of excess emissions including all available
information from Condition XII.A.1.b below.

(2) Detailed written notification by submission of an excess emissions report within 72 hours of the notification pursuant to Condition XII.A.1.a.(1) above.

b. The report shall contain the following information:

(1) Identity of each stack or other emission point where the excess emissions occurred;

(2) Magnitude of the excess emissions expressed in the units of the applicable emission limitation and the operating data and calcula tions used in determining the magnitude of the excess emissions;

(3) Date, time and duration, or expect ed duration, of the excess emissions;

(4) Identity of the equipment from which the excess emissions emanated;

(5) Nature and cause of such emissions;

(6) If the excess emissions were the result of a malfunction, steps taken to remedy the malfunction and the steps taken or planned to prevent the recurrence of such malfunctions; and

(7) Steps taken to limit the excess emissions; if the excess emissions resulted from startup or malfunction, the report shall contain a list of the steps taken to comply with the permit procedures.

2. In the case of continuous or recurring excess emissions, the notification requirements of this section shall be satisfied if the source provid es the required notification after excess emissions
are first detected and includes in such notifica tion an estimate of the time the excess emissions will continue. Excess emissions occurring after the estimated time period or changes in the nature of the emissions as originally reported shall require additional notification pursuant to
Condition XII.A.1 above. [A.A.C. R18-2-310.01.C]

B. Permit Deviations Reporting [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.5.b]
The Permittee shall promptly report deviati ons from permit requirements, including those attributable to upset conditions as defined in the permit, the probable cause of such deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures taken. Prompt reporting shall mean that the report was submitted to the Director by certified mail, facsimile, or hand delivery within two working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded due to an emergency or within two working days of the time when the owner or operator first learned of the occurrence of a deviation from a permit requirement.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 7 1/31/07 C. Emergency Provision [A.A.C. R18-2-306.E]

1. An “emergency” means any s ituation arising from sudden and reasonable unforeseeable events beyond the control of the source, in cluding acts of God, that require immediate corrective action to restore normal operation, and that causes th e source to exceed a technology-based emission limitation under th e permit, due to unavoidable increases in emissions attributable to the emergency. An emergency shall not include noncompliance to the extent caused by improperly designed equi pment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or operator error.

2. An emergency constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology-based emission limitations if Condition XII.C.3 is met.

3. The affirmative defense of emergency shall be demonstrated through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:

a. An emergency occurred and that the Permittee can identify the cause(s) of the

emergency;

b. The permitted facility was being properly operated at the time;

c. During the period of the emergency, the Permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize
levels of emissions that exceeded the emissi ons standards or other requirements in the permit; and

d. The Permittee submitted notice of the emergency to the Director by certified mail, facsimile, or hand delivery within two working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded due to the emerge ncy. This notice shall contain a description of the emergency, any steps taken to miti gate emissions, and corrective action taken.

4. In any enforcement proceeding, the Permittee seeking to est ablish the occurrence of an emergency has the burden of proof.

5. This provision is in addition to any emergency or upset provision contained in any applicable requirement.

D. Compliance Schedule [ARS §49-426.I.5]
For any excess emission or permit deviation that can not be corrected with 72 hours, the Permittee is required to submit a compliance schedule to the Di rector within 21 days of such occurrence. The compliance schedule shall include a schedule of remedial measures, including an enforceable sequence of actions with milestones, leading to co mpliance with the permit terms or conditions that
have been violated.

E. Affirmative Defenses for Excess Emissions Due to Malfunctions, Startup, and Shutdown

[A.A.C. R18-2-310]

1. Applicability

This rule establishes affirmative defenses fo r certain emissions in excess of an emission standard or limitation and applies to all emis sion standards or limitations except for standards
or limitations:

a. Promulgated pursuant to Sections 111 or 112 of the Act;

b. Promulgated pursuant to Titles IV or VI of the Clean Air Act;

c. Contained in any Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) or New Source Review (NSR) permit issued by the U.S. EPA;

d. Contained in A.A.C. R18-2-715.F; orFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 8 1/31/07 e. Included in a permit to meet the requirements of A.A.C. R18-2-406.A.5

2. Affirmative Defense for Malfunctions

Emissions in excess of an applicable emission limitation due to malfunc tion shall constitute a violation. When emissions in excess of an applicable emission limitation are due to a malfunction, the Permittee has an affirmative defe nse to a civil or administrative enforcement proceeding based on that violation, other than a j udicial action seeking inj unctive relief, if the Permittee has complied with the reporting re quirements of A.A.C. R18-2-310.01 and has demonstrated all of the following:

a. The excess emissions resulted from a sudde n and unavoidable breakdown of process equipment or air pollution control equipment beyond the reasonable control of the Permittee;

b. The air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or processes were at all times maintained and operated in a manner cons istent with good practice for minimizing emissions;

c. If repairs were required, the repairs were made in an expeditious fashion when the applicable emission limitations were being exceeded. Off-shift labor and overtime were utilized where practicable to ensure that the repairs were made as expeditiously as possible. If off-shift labor and overtime we re not utilized, the Permittee satisfactorily demonstrated that the measures were impracticable;

d. The amount and duration of the excess emissi ons (including any bypass operation) were minimized to the maximum extent practicable during periods of such emissions;

e. All reasonable steps were taken to minimize the impact of the excess emissions on ambient air quality;

f. The excess emissions were not part of a recu rring pattern indicative of inadequate design, operation, or maintenance;

g. During the period of excess emissions there were no exceedances of the relevant ambient air quality standards established in Title 18, Chapter 2, Article 2 of the Arizona Administrative Code that could be attributed to the emitting source;

h. The excess emissions did not stem from any activity or event that could have been foreseen and avoided, or planned, and could not have been avoided by better operations and maintenance practices;

i. All emissions monitoring systems were kept in operation if at all practicable; and

j. The Permittee's actions in response to th e excess emissions were documented by contemporaneous records.

3. Affirmative Defense for Startup and Shutdown

a. Except as provided in Condition XII.E.3.b be low, and unless otherwise provided for in the applicable requirement, emissions in excess of an applicable emission limitation due to startup and shutdown shall constitute a violation. When emissions in excess of an applicable emission limitation are due to startup and shutdown, the Permittee has an
affirmative defense to a civil or administ rative enforcement proceeding based on that violation, other than a judicial action seek ing injunctive relief, if the Permittee has complied with the reporting requirements of A. A.C. R18-2-310.01 and has demonstrated all of the following:

(1) The excess emissions could not have been prevented through careful and prudent planning and design;Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 9 1/31/07 (2) If the excess emissions were the result of a bypass of control equipment, the bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, pe rsonal injury, or severe damage to air pollution control equipment, production equipment, or other property;

(3) The air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or processes were at all times maintained and operated in a ma nner consistent with good practice for minimizing emissions;

(4) The amount and duration of the excess emi ssions (including any bypass operation)
were minimized to the maximum extent practicable during periods of such emissions;

(5) All reasonable steps were taken to minimize the impact of the excess emissions on ambient air quality;

(6) During the period of excess emissions there were no exceedances of the relevant ambient air quality standards established in Title 18, Chapter 2, Article 2 of the Arizona Administrative Code that could be attributed to the emitting source;

(7) All emissions monitoring systems were kept in operation if at all practicable; and

(8) Contemporaneous records documented the Permittee’s actions in response to the
excess emissions.

b. If excess emissions occur due to a malfunction during routine startup and shutdown, then
those instances shall be treated as other malf unctions subject to Co ndition XII.E.2 above.

4. Affirmative Defense for Malfuncti ons during Scheduled Maintenance

If excess emissions occur due to a malfunction during scheduled maintenance, then those instances will be treated as other malfunctions subject to Condition XII.E.2 above.

5. Demonstration of Reasonable and Practicable Measures

For an affirmative defense under Condition X II.E.2 or XII.E.3 above, the Permittee shall demonstrate, through submission of the data and information required by Condition XII.E and A.A.C. R18-2-310.01, that all reasonable and practicable measures within the Permittee’s control were implemented to prevent the occurrence of the excess emissions.

XIII. RECORD KEEPING REQUIREMENTS [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.4]

A. The Permittee shall keep records of all required monitoring information including, but not limited to, the following:

1. The date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurements;

2. The date(s) analyses were performed;

3. The name of the company or entit y that performed the analyses;

4. A description of the analytical techniques or methods used;

5. The results of such analyses; and

6. The operating conditions as existing at the time of sampling or measurement.

B. The Permittee shall retain records of all require d monitoring data and support information for a period of at least 5 years from the date of th e monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. Support information includes all calib ration and maintenance records and all original strip-chart recordings or other data recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, andFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 10 1/31/07 copies of all reports required by the permit.

C. All required records shall be maintained either in an unchangeable electronic format or in a handwritten logbook utiliz ing indelible ink.

XIV. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.5.a]

The Permittee shall submit the following reports:

A. Compliance certifications in accordance with Section VII of Attachment “A”.

B. Excess emission; permit deviation, and emergenc y reports in accordance with Section XII of
Attachment “A”.

C. Other reports required by any condition of Attachment “B”.

XV. DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION [A.A.C. R18-2-304.G and -306.A.8.e]

A. The Permittee shall furnish to the Director, with in a reasonable time, any information that the Director may request in writing to determine wh ether cause exists for revising, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the perm it, or to determine compliance wi th the permit. Upon request, the
Permittee shall also furnish to the Director copies of records required to be kept by the permit. For information claimed to be confidential, the Perm ittee shall furnish an additional copy of such records directly to the Administrator along with a claim of confidentiality.

B. If the Permittee has failed to submit any relevant f acts or has submitted incorrect information in the permit application, the Permittee shall, upon becoming aware of such failure or incorrect submittal, promptly submit such supplementary facts or corrected information.

XVI. PERMIT AMENDMENT OR REVISION [A.A.C. R18-2-318, -319, and -320]

The Permittee shall apply for a permit amendment or revision for changes to the facility which does not qualify for a facility change without re vision under Section XVII, as follows:

A. Administrative Permit Amendment (A.A.C. R18-2-318);

B. Minor Permit Revision (A.A.C. R18-2-319); and

C. Significant Permit Revision (A.A.C. R18-2-320)

The applicability and requirements for such action ar e defined in the above referenced regulations.

XVII. FACILITY CHANGE WITHOUT A PERMIT REVISION [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.4 and -317]

A. The Permittee may make changes at the permitted source without a permit revision if all of the following apply:

1. The changes are not modifications under any prov ision of Title I of the Act or under ARS §49- 401.01(19);

2. The changes do not exceed the emissions a llowable under the permit whether expressed therein as a rate of emissions or in terms of total emissions;

3. The changes do not violate any applicable requirements or trigger any additional applicableFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 11 1/31/07 requirements;

4. The changes satisfy all requirements for a mi nor permit revision under A.A.C. R18-2-319.A;
and

5. The changes do not contravene federally enfo rceable permit terms and conditions that are monitoring (including test methods), record k eeping, reporting, or compliance certification requirements.

B. The substitution of an item of process or pollu tion control equipment for an identical or substantially similar item of process or pollution control equipment shall qualify as a change that does not require a permit revision, if it meets all of the requirements of Conditions XVII.A and
XVII.C of this Attachment.

C. For each change under Conditions XVII.A and XVII. B above, a written notice by certified mail or hand delivery shall be received by the Director and the Administrator a minimum of 7 working days in advance of the change. Notifications of changes associated with emergency conditions, such as malfunctions necessitating the replacement of equipment, may be provided less than 7 working days in advance of the change, but must be provided as far in advance of the change as possible or, if advance notification is not prac ticable, as soon after the change as possible.

D. Each notification shall include:

1. When the proposed change will occur;

2. A description of the change;

3. Any change in emissions of regulated air pollutants; and

4. Any permit term or condition that is no l onger applicable as a result of the change.

E. The permit shield described in A.A.C. R18-2-325 shall not apply to any change made under this Section, other than implementation of an a lternate to Conditions XVII.A and XVII.B above.

F. Except as otherwise provided for in the permit, making a change from one alternative operating scenario to another as provided under A.A.C. R 18-2-306.A.11 shall not require any prior notice
under this Section.

G. Notwithstanding any other part of this Section, the Director may require a permit to be revised for any change that, when considered together with any other changes submitted by the same source under this Section over the term of the pe rmit, do not satisfy Condition XVII.A above.

XVIII. TESTING REQUIREMENTS [A.A.C. R18-2-312]

A. The Permittee shall conduct performance tests as speci fied in the permit and at such other times as may be required by the Director.

B. Operational Conditions during Testing

Tests shall be conducted during operation at th e maximum possible capacity of each unit under representative operational conditions unless other c onditions are required by the applicable test method or in this permit. With prior written a pproval from the Director, testing may be performed at a lower rate. Operations during periods of start-up, shutdown, and malfunction (as defined in A.A.C. R18-2-101) shall not constitute repre sentative operational conditions unless otherwise specified in the applicable standard.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 12 1/31/07 C. Tests shall be conducted and data reduced in accordance with the test methods and procedures contained in the Arizona Testing Manual unless modified by the Director pursuant to A.A.C. R18-

2-312.B.

D. Test Plan

At least 14 calendar days prior to performing a test , the Permittee shall submit a test plan to the
Director in accordance with A.A.C. R18-2-312.B a nd the Arizona Testing Manual. This test plan must include the following:

1. Test duration;

2. Test location(s);

3. Test method(s); and

4. Source operation and other parameters that may affect test results.

E. Stack Sampling Facilities

The Permittee shall provide, or cause to be pr ovided, performance testing facilities as follows:

1. Sampling ports adequate for test methods applicable to the facility;

2. Safe sampling platform(s);

3. Safe access to sampling platform(s); and

4. Utilities for sampling and testing equipment.

F. Interpretation of Final Results

Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs using the applicable test method. Each
run shall be conducted for the time and under the c onditions specified in the applicable standard. For the purpose of determining compliance with an applicable standard, the arithmetic mean of the results of the three runs shall apply. In the even t that a sample is accidentally lost or conditions occur in which one of the three runs is require d to be discontinued because of forced shutdown, failure of an irreplaceable portion of the sample train, extreme meteorological conditions, or other circumstances beyond the Permitte e’s control, compliance may, upon the Director’s approval, be determined using the arithmetic mean of the results of the other two runs. If the Director or the Director’s designee is present, tests may only be stopped with the Director ’s or such designee’s approval. If the Director or the Director’s designee is not present, tests may only be stopped for good cause. Good cause includes: forced shutdown, failure of an irreplaceable portion of the sample train, extreme meteorological conditions , or other circumstances beyond the Permittee’s control. Termination of any test without goo d cause after the first run is commenced shall constitute a failure of the test. Supporting docume ntation, which demonstrates good cause, must be
submitted.

G. Report of Final Test Results

A written report of the results of all performance te sts shall be submitted to the Director within 30 days after the test is performed. The report sh all be submitted in accordance with the Arizona Testing Manual and A.A.C. R18-2-312.A.

XIX. PROPERTY RIGHTS [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.8.d]

This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 13 1/31/07 XX. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.7]

The provisions of this permit are sever able. In the event of a challenge to any portion of this permit, or if any portion of this permit is held invalid, the remaining permit conditions remain valid and in force.

XXI. PERMIT SHIELD [A.A.C. R18-2-325]

Compliance with the conditions of this permit sh all be deemed compliance with all applicable requirements identified in the portions of this permit subtitled “Permit Shield”. The permit shield shall not apply to minor revisions pursuant to Condition XVI .B of this Attachment and any facility changes without a permit revision pursuant to Section XVII of this Attachment.

XXII. PROTECTION OF STRATOSPHERIC OZONE [40 CFR Part 82]

If this source becomes subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 82, then the Permittee shall comply with these provisions accordingly.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 14 1/31/07 

## ATTACHMENT “B”: SPECIFIC CONDITIONS

Air Quality Control Permit No. 35426

For Phoenix Cement Company

I. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

A. At the time the compliance certifications required by Section VII of Attachment "A" of this Permit are submitted, the Permittee shall submit reports of all monitoring activities required by this Attachment performed in the same six month period as applies to the compliance certification period. All instances of deviations from permit re quirements shall be clearly identified in such reports. All required reports shall be certified by a responsible o fficial consistent with Section VIII, Attachment “A” of this Permit. [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.5.a]

B. The conditions of this Attachment shall apply to equipment identified in Attachment “C” of this
Permit. In the event that after the date of permit issuance, the Permittee identifies equipment existing at the plant at the time of permit issuance, but not included in the permit application for this permit, or if the Permittee identifies errors in Attachment “C” of this Permit, the Permittee shall follow the appropriate administrative procedur es as set forth in Article 3 of Title 18, Chapter
2 of the Arizona Administrative Code to include su ch equipment in the permit or to correct such

errors. [A.A.C. R18-2-304.G]

C. The Permittee shall have on site or on call a person that is certified in EPA Reference Method 9.

[A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c]

D. The Permittee shall not emit gaseous or odorous mate rials from equipment, operations or premises under his control in such quantities or c oncentrations as to cause air pollution. [A.A.C. R18-2-730.D]

E. Where a stack, vent or other outlet at the Permittee’s premises, which is not otherwise subject to the Existing Stationary Source Performance Standa rds, the New Source Performance Standards, or the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants of Title 18, Chapter 2 of the Arizona Administrative Code, is at such a level that fumes, gas mist, odor, smoke, vapor or any combination thereof constituting air pollution is disch arged to adjoining property, the Director may require the installation of abatement equipment or the alteration of such stack, vent, or other outlet by the Permittee thereof to a degree that will ade quately dilute, reduce or eliminate the discharge of air pollution to adjoining property. [A.A.C. R18-2-730.G]

F. The Permittee shall not cause, allow or permit discharge from any stationary source carbon monoxide emissions without the use of complete secondary combustion of waste gases generated by any process source. [A.A.C. R18-2-730.I]

G. Nothing in this Attachment shall be so construe d as to prevent the utilization of measurements from emissions monitoring devices or techniques not designated as performance tests as evidence of compliance with applicable good main tenance and operating requirements. [A.A.C. R18-2-312.I]

H. The permit conditions or portions of the permit c onditions which are material pursuant to A.A.C. R18-2-331 and A.R.S. §49-464 are indicated by double underlined and italicized print

.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 15 1/31/07 II. FACILITY-WIDE OPERATIONS GOVERNED BY VOLUNTARILY ACCEPTED
PROVISIONS [A.A.C. R18-2-306.01]

A. Applicability

The conditions of this Section apply to the pollu tant-emitting activities facility wide that include Portland cement operations, quarry operations, coal preparation operations, cooling towers, and all other unclassified point sources a nd non-point sources that are contiguous or adjacent to the facility’s main operation and under common control of the Permittee.

B. Emission Limits/Standards [A.A.C. R18-2-306.01 and -331.A.3.a]

1. Facility-Wide Emission Caps

The Permittee shall not cause to be dischar ged into the atmosphere from facility-wide operations, air emissions in rolling 12- month total in excess of the following:

a. 773 tons per year of particulate matter (PM);

b. 460 tons per year of PM with an aerodynam ic diameter less than 10 microns (PM 10 ) ;

c. 401 tons per year of sulfur dioxide (SO 2 );

d. 3,271 tons per year of nitrogen oxides (NOx);

e. 764 tons per year of carbon monoxide (CO); and

f. 41.5 tons per year of volatile organic compounds (VOC)

.

2. Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill Emission Limits

a. The Permittee shall not cause to be discharge d into the atmosphere from the Kiln 4/InLine Raw Mill and Coal Mill operation, air emissions in rolling 12-month total in excess of the following:

(1) 400 tons SO 2 per year;
(2) 3,240 tons NOx per year; and

(3) 698 tons CO per year

.
b. The Permittee shall not cause to be discharge d into the atmosphere from the Kiln 4/InLine Raw Mill and Coal Mill operation, any gases which contain CO in excess of 2.0 pounds per ton of clinker in rolling 8-hour average.

3. Operation Limitations

a. The Permittee shall not discharge quarry explosives in excess of the following:

(1) 913 tons per year in rolling 12-month total;

(2) 70 tons per calendar day; and

(3) 10 tons per hour

.
b. The Permittee shall not cause to stack clin ker in the open except when performingspecilty grinding in the warmer months of any given year, during which time, the Permittee may maintain temporary outdoor storage of no more than 2,000 tons of clinker.

c. The Permittee shall operate and maintain all e quipment at the facility in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.

d. Fuel Usage

(1) The Permittee shall only burn the following fuels at the facility:Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 16 1/31/07 Fuel Type Maximum Fuel Proportion (% Heat Input)

Coal 100

Pet-Coke 100

#2 Fuel Oil 100

Natural Gas 100

(2) Maximum fuel proportion is defined as th e maximum percent of actual heat input provided by a fuel component in a fuel mixture.

C. Air Pollution Control Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.01 and -331.A.3.e]

1. Except as provided in Condition II.B.3.b above, the Permittee shall at all times, store clinker in the two clinker storage domes (DO-200 a nd DO-201) and the clinker bin (B-404) for minimizing particulate emissions fr om clinker handling and storage activity

.

2. At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the Permittee shall

operate and maintain the production activities facility-wide, including any associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emi ssions to the levels required by Conditions
II.B.1 and 2 above

.

3. The good air pollution control practices include, but are not limited to, implementation of the following by the Permittee to ensure good combustion practice:

a. Manufacturer’s specified operating procedures;

b. Startup, shutdown and malfunction plan re quired by Section III of this Attachment;

c. Operation and Maintenance Plan included in Attachment “E” of this Permit.

4. Determination of whether acceptable operation a nd maintenance procedures are being used for minimizing emissions will be based on information available to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring r esults, review of operation and maintenance procedures, review of operation and maintena nce records, and inspection of the source.

D. Monitoring and Performance Testing Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3 and 331.A.3.c]

1. Within 180 days following issuance of the Permit

, the Permittee shall install

, calibrate

, maintain and operate continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) at Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill stack (S-401) and at Coal Mill st ack (S-453), for measuring CO, NOx and SO 2 concentrations of the exhau st gases passing each stack . All continuous emissions monitoring systems shall meet the following:

a. The Permittee shall follow the monitoring pro cedures and performance specifications as required by Subpart A and Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 60.

b. The Permittee shall maintain 95 percent data recovery on all the data obtained from the CEMS. Compliance with this data recovery requirement shall be determined based on total Kiln 4 operating time during a 365 day period.

c. The CEMS shall be designed so that one cycle of operation is complete for each successive 15-minute period.

d. All data gaps shall be filled with the averag e hourly concentration recorded by the CEMS for the hour immediately before and the hour immediately after the missing data period.

e. Instrument span shall be such that the ex pected output is 50 to 70 percent of span.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 17 1/31/07 f. The Permittee shall develop and submit to the Director within 30 days of the issuance of the Permit, a Quality Assurance/Quality Cont rol (QA/QC) plan. The QA/QC plan shall be at least as stringent as required by Appendix F of 40 CFR Part 60 and shall include a quarterly CEMS auditing scheme that requires a relative accuracy test audit (RATA) at least once every four calendar quarters, rotate d by cylinder gas audits (CGA) or relative accuracy audits (RAA) in other three of the four calendar quarters. The CGA or RAA shall be conducted no more than three qua rters in succession. The Permittee shall implement the QA/QC plan upon its approval by the Director. The Permittee shall notify the Director 14 days prior to performing RATA or CGA.

2. Within 180 days following issuance of the Permit, the Permittee shall install

, calibrate

, maintain and operate flow monitors at K4/In-Line Raw Mill stack (S-401) and at Coal Mill stack (S-453), for measuring volumetric flow rates of the exhaust gases passing each stack

. All flow monitors shall meet the following:

a. The Permittee shall follow the monitoring pro cedures and performance specifications as required by Subpart A and Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 60.

b. The Permittee shall maintain 95 percent data recovery on all the data obtained from the flow monitors. Compliance with this data recovery requirement shall be determined based on total Kiln 4 operating time during a 365 day period.

c. All data gaps shall be filled with the aver age hourly flow rate recorded by the flow monitor for the hour immediately before and the hour immediately after the missing data period.

3. Within 180 days following issuance of the Permit, the Permittee shall install

, calibrate

, maintain and operate a permanent weigh scale system to measure and record weight rates in tons-mass per hour of the amount of clinker produced by Kiln 4 . The scale system shall be maintained within ±5% accuracy . A process weigh scale may be substituted for this purpose, provided it meets the accuracy test.

4. The Permittee shall conduct performan ce tests to determine PM and PM 10 emissions as
follows: [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and 312]

a. The performance tests shall be conducted at and samples be withdrawn from the following locations and in accordance with the following frequencies:

Test Location Test Frequency

In-Line Raw Mill Stack S-401 Annually

Clinker Cooler Stack S-402 Annually

Coal Mill Stack S-453 Annually

OK Mill Stack S-350 Annually

DC301 Vent Once every two years

DC302 Vent Once every two years

DC303 Vent Once every two years

b. The following USEPA Reference Methods sh all be used for the performance tests:

(1) For PM, Methods 1-5 with Method 202 for back half; and

(2) For PM 10 , Methods 1-5 or Method 201/201A with Method 202 for back half.

c. All performance tests shall follow the procedures of Section XVIII of Attachment “A”.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 18 1/31/07 E. Compliance Determination [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3 and 306.01.A]

1. The Permittee shall have available the followi ng hourly average data for each stack/vent, based on measurements performed by the CEMS and flow monitors:

a. Pounds per hour SO 2

b. Pounds per hour NOx

c. Pounds per hour CO

2. The Permittee shall have available the followi ng hourly data from production activities, based on measurements performed by weigh scal e system or other equivalent methods:

a. Tons per hour of clinker produced

b. Tons per hour of quarry explosives discharged

3. The Permittee shall calculate and record at the end of each hour, rolling 8-hour average of CO emissions total in pounds per ton of clinker (lb/ton) from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453, using the hourly data from Conditions II.E.1 and 2 above;

4. The Permittee shall calculate and record at th e end of each calendar day, tons of quarry explosives discharged during that day.

5. The Permittee shall perform the following on the last day of each calendar month:

a. Calculate and record for SO 2 , NOx and CO separately, the monthly emissions total in
tons from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Co al Mill stack S-453, using the hourly data
from Condition II.E.1 above.

b. Renew and record for SO 2 , NOx and CO separately, the rolling 12-month emissions total in tons from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453, using the monthly emission data for the immediate past 12 consecutive months.

c. Renew and record for PM, PM 10 , SO 2 , NOx, CO and VOC separately, the rolling 12- month emissions total in tons from facility- wide operations. The emissions evaluation shall be conducted using monthly emission da ta for the immediate past 12 consecutive months that may include, but is not limited to, the most recent stack testing results, rolling 12-month emission totals of indivi dual sources, vendor provided emission data, and/or the current AP-42 factors published by USEPA. If available, the data type with the higher preference level shown as follows sha ll always be utilized in the evaluation:

(1) CEMS (the highest preference);

(2) Parametric source tests;

(3) Single source tests;

(4) Material balance;

(5) Source category emissions model;

(6) State/industry factors; and

(7) AP-42 emission factors (the lowest preference).

d. Calculate and record in tons, the quarry ex plosives usage for that month and the rolling
12-month total.

6. The Permittee shall determine compliance with the rolling 8-hour CO limit set forth in Condition II.B.2.b by comparing Condition II.E. 3 CO calculation results to this limit.

7. The Permittee shall determine compliance with the rolling 12-month total emission limits setFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 19 1/31/07 forth for each pollutant in Conditions II.B.1 and 2 by comparing Condition II.E.5 results to the limits corresponding to that pollutant.

8. The Permittee shall determine compliance with the quarry explosives limits set forth in Condition II.B.3.a by comparing Conditions II.E. 2, 4 and 5 explosives usage results to the
limits.

F. Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.4 and 305.A.5]

1. The Permittee shall report to the Director consis tent with Section XII.A, Attachment “A” of the Permit, any emissions in excess of the lim its established under Conditions II.B.1 and 2 of
this Attachment.

2. The Permittee shall report to the Director consis tent with Section XII.B, Attachment “A” of the Permit, any incidence that exhibits devi ation from the operation limitations established
under Condition II.B.3 of this Attachment.

3. The Permittee shall submit a semiannual report along with the compliance certification to include the following information for the past six (6) months period:

a. Rolling 8-hour averages of CO emissions total in pounds per ton of clinker (lb/ton) from
In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453 calculated at each hour. This item may be submitted in an electronic format.

b. For SO 2 , NOx and CO separately, the monthly emissions totals from In-Line Raw Mill
stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453 tallied at each month.

c. For SO 2 , NOx and CO separately, the rolling 12-month emissions totals from In-Line
Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453 for each month.

d. For PM, PM 10 , SO 2 , NOx, CO and VOC separately, the rolling 12-month emissions totals from facility-wide operations for each month.

e. Summary of all incidences of exceedance or deviation occurred during the past six (6)
months to include:

(1) Magnitude of each exceedance or deviation recorded;

(2) Any conversion factor(s) used in calculation;

(3) Date and time of commencement and completion of each exceedance or deviation
due to:
(a) Startup/shutdown
(b) Control equipment problems
(c) Process problems
(d) Other known causes, or
(e) Unknown causes

(4) Nature and cause of any malfunction, if known;

(5) Corrective action taken or preventative measures adopted;

(6) Total duration of exceedance or devi ations during the reporting period;

(7) Total source operating time during the reporting period; and

(8) (Total duration of exceedance or deviati ons) * 100 / (Total source operating time).

f. A monitoring systems performance report for each continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) that includes:Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 20 1/31/07 (1) Each CEMS downtime in the reporting period due to:
(a) Monitor equipment malfunction
(b) Non-Monitor equipment malfunction
(c) Quality assurance calibration
(d) Other known causes, or
(e) Unknown causes

(2) Nature of the system repairs or adjustments;

(3) Total CEMS downtime; and

(4) (Total CEMS downtime) * 100 / (Total source operating time).

4. The Permittee shall maintain a file of all measurements including performance testing, continuous monitoring system performance eval uations, all continuous monitoring system or monitoring device calibration checks, and adju stments and maintenance performed on the systems or devices. This data shall be record ed in a permanent form suitable for inspection.

5. The Permittee shall maintain the following:

a. Hourly records of rolling 8-hour average of CO emissions total in pounds per ton of clinker (lb/ton) from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453.

b. For SO 2 , NOx and CO separately, monthly records of monthly emissions total in tons
from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453.

c. For SO 2 , NOx and CO separately, monthly records of rolling 12-month emissions total in
tons from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453.

d. For PM, PM 10 , SO 2 , NOx, CO and VOC separately, monthly records of rolling 12-month
emissions total in tons from facility-wide operations.

e. Records of hourly, daily and rolling 12-month total quarry explosives usage.

f. Daily records of the type and amount of each fuel component utilized in Kiln 4.

g. Records of the manufacturer’s specifications for all equipment on-site.

6. All records, analyses, and reports shall be reta ined for a minimum of five years from the date of generation. The most recent two y ears of data shall be kept on-site.

III. PORTLAND CEMENT OPERATIONS GOVERNED BY MAXIMUM AVAILABLE CONTROL TECHNOLOGY (MACT) STANDARDS

A. Applicability

The affected sources subject to this Section are:

1. The in-line kiln/raw mill system that includes Kiln 4 (K-404), Pre-heater PH-404 through 408 and CAL-404, In-Line Raw Mill RM-306, and Coal Mill RM-450;

2. Clinker Cooler CC-404;

3. Raw Mill BM-301 and Swing Mill BM-302 when used for raw feed grinding;

4. Finish Mills BM-303 and 304, OK Mill BM-305, and Swing Mill BM-302 when used for clinker grinding;

5. Raw material dryers BM-301 and BM-302 when used for raw feed grinding;Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 21 1/31/07 6. Each raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin;

7. Each conveying system transfer point including those associated with coal preparation used to convey coal from the mill to the kiln; and

8. Each bagging and bulk loading and unloading system.

B. Emission Limits/Standards

1. Standards for the Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill

a. The Permittee shall not cause to be discharge d into the atmosphere from the Kiln 4/InLine Raw Mill and Coal Mill, any gases which: [40 CFR 63.1343(b)]
(1) Contain particulate matter (PM), In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 and Coal Mill RM-450 combined, in excess of 0.15 kg per Mg (0.30 lb per ton) of feed (dry basis) to the
kiln.

(2) Exhibit opacity greater than 20 percent.

(3) Contain dioxins/furans (D/F) in excess of:
(a) 0.20 ng per dscm (8.7x10 -11 gr per dscf) (toxicity equivalents (TEQ)) corrected
to seven percent oxygen; or
(b) 0.40 ng per dscm (1.7x10 -10 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen, when the average of the performan ce test run average temperatures at the inlet to the PM control device DC-431 is 204 °C (400 °F) or less.

b. The Permittee shall operate the Kiln 4/In-Lin e Raw Mill and Coal Mill system, such that:
[40 CFR 63.1344(a)(1), 63.1344 (a)(2), 63.1344(b), and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.b]
(1) When In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 is operating, the flue temperature at the inlet to DC-431 does not exceed the applicable exhaust temperature limit specified in Condition III.E.1.c(5) of this Attachment and established during the performance test when the raw mill was operating; and

(2) When In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 is not operating, the flue temperatur e at the inlet to DC-431 does not exceed the applicable exhaust temperature limit specified in Condition III.E.1.c(5) of this Attachment and established during the performance test when the raw mill was not operating.

2. Standards for Clinker Coolers [40 CFR 63.1345(a)]

The Permittee shall not cause to be discharged in to the atmosphere from the clinker cooler any gases which:

a. Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.050 kg per Mg (0.10 lb per ton) of feed (dry basis) to the kiln.

b. Exhibit opacity greater than 10 percent

3. Standards for Raw Material Dryers [40 CFR 63.1346(a)]

The Permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the raw material dryer any gases which exhibit opacity greater than 10 percent.

4. Standards for Raw and Finish Mills [40 CFR 63.1347]

The Permittee shall not cause to be discharge d from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which e xhibit opacity in excess of 10 percent.

5. Standards for Material Handling Points [40 CFR 63.1348]Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 22 1/31/07 The Permittee shall not cause to be discharged fro m any raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin, conveying system transfer point, bagging system, and bulk loading or unloading system any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of 10 percent.

C. Operation and Maintenance Requirements

1. Operation and maintenance requirements establis hed in this subsection pursuant to Section 112 of the Act are enforceable independent of em issions limitations or other requirements in
relevant standards. [40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(iii)]

2. The Permittee shall continue to implement and comply with the Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan prescribed in Attachment “E” of this Permit. Failure to comply with any provision of the plan shall be a violation of this Permit. Any revisions to the plan shall be submitted to the Director for review and appr oval as part of the permit revision application described in Section XVI, Attachment “A” of this Permit and shall include the information required in 40 CFR 63.1350(a). [40 CFR 63.1350(a) and (b)]

3. At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the Permittee shall

operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment and monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions . During a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction, this general duty to minimize emissions requires that the Permittee reduce emissions from the affected source to the greatest extent which is consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices. The general duty to minimize emissions during a period of startup, shutdown, or malfunction does not re quire the Permittee to achieve emission levels that would be required by the applicable standard at other times if this is not consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices, nor does it require the Permittee to make any
further efforts to reduce emissions if levels re quired by the applicable standard have been
achieved. Determination of whether such operation and maintenance procedures are being
used will be based on information available to the Director which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring results, review of opera tion and maintenance procedures (including the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan requi red in Condition III.C.5 below), review of operation and maintenance records, and inspection of the source.
[40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(i) and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.e]

4. The Permittee shall correct malfunctions as s oon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in Condition III.C.5 below. To the extent that an unexpected event arises during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction, the Permittee shall comply by minimizing emissions during such a startup, shutdown, and malfunction event consistent with safety and good air pollution control practices. [40 CFR 63.6(e)(1)(ii)]

5. Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Plan [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)]

a. The Permittee shall have developed and c ontinue to implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan that describ es, in detail, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of st artup, shutdown, and malfunction, and a program of corrective action for malfunctioning process and air pollution control and monitoring equipment used to comply with th is Section. The purpose of the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is to

(1) Ensure that, at all times, the Permittee ope rates and maintains each affected source, including associated air pollution control and monitoring equipment, in a manner which satisfies the general duty to mini mize emissions established by Condition III.C.2 above;

(2) Ensure that the Permittee is prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicableFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 23 1/31/07 after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions of hazardous air pollutants; and

(3) Reduce the reporting burden associated with periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (including corrective action ta ken to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment to its no rmal or usual manner of operation).

b. During periods of startup, shutdown, and malf unction, the Permittee of an affected source must operate and maintain such source (i ncluding associated air pollution control and monitoring equipment) in accordance with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan deve loped under Condition III.C.5.a above.

c. The Permittee shall maintain at the affected source a current startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan and shall make the plan available upon request for inspection and copying by the Director. In addition, if th e startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is subsequently revised as provided in Condition III.C.5.d below, the Permittee shall maintain at the affected source each previous (i.e., superseded) version of the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, and shall make each such previous version available for inspection and copying by the Director for a period of 5 years after revision of the plan. The Director may at any time request in writing that the Permittee submit a copy of any startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan (or a portion thereof) which is maintained at the affected source or in the possession of the Perm ittee. Upon receipt of such a request, the Permittee must promptly submit a copy of the requested plan (or a portion thereof) to the Director. The Director shall request that the Permittee submit a particular startup, shutdown, or malfunction plan (or a portion thereof) whenever a member of the public submits a specific and reasonable request to examine or to receive a copy of that plan or portion of a plan. The Permittee may elect to submit the required copy of any startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan to the Director in an electronic format. If the Permittee claims that any portion of such a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is confidential business information entitled to protection fro m disclosure under Section 114(c) of the Act or 40 CFR 2.301, the material which is claimed as confidential shall be clearly designated in the submission.

d. Based on the results of a determination ma de under Condition III.C.3 above, the Director may require that the Permittee make chang es to the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for that source. The Director shall require appropriate revisions to a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, if the Director finds that the plan:

(1) Does not address a startup, shutdown, or malfunction event that has occurred;

(2) Fails to provide for the operation of the source (including associated air pollution control and monitoring equipment) during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction event in a manner consistent with the general duty to minimize emissions established by Condition III.C.3 above;

(3) Does not provide adequate procedures fo r correcting malfunctioning process and/or air pollution control and monitoring eq uipment as quickly as practicable; or

(4) Includes an event that does not meet the definition of startup, shutdown, or
malfunction listed in 40 CFR 63.2.

e. The Permittee may periodically revise the start up, shutdown, and malfunction plan for the affected source as necessary to satisfy the requirements of this Section or to reflect changes in equipment or procedures at the a ffected source. Unless the Director provides otherwise, the Permittee may make such re visions to the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan without prior approval by the Director. However, each such revision to a startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan shall be reported in the semiannual report required by Condition III.G.2.d below. If th e startup, shutdown, and malfunction planFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 24 1/31/07 fails to address or inadequately addresses an event that meets the characteristics of a
malfunction but was not included in the start up, shutdown, and malfunction plan at the time the Permittee developed the plan, the Perm ittee shall revise the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan within 45 days after th e event to include detailed procedures for operating and maintaining the source during si milar malfunction events and a program of
corrective action for similar malfunctions of process or air pollution control and monitoring equipment. In the event that th e Permittee makes any revision to the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan which alters the scope of the activities at the source which are deemed to be a startup, shutdown, or malfunction, or otherwise modifies the applicability of any emission limit, work practice requirement, or other requirement in a standard established under this part, the revised plan shall not take effect until after the Permittee has provided a written notice describing the revision to the permitting authority.

f. The Permittee shall operate and maintain the facility in accordance with the procedures specified in the current startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan. However, any revisions made to the startup, shutdown, and malfunc tion plan in accordance with the procedures established by the Section shall not be deemed to constitute permit revisions. Moreover, none of the procedures specified by the star tup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for an
affected source shall be deemed to fall with in the permit shield provision in Section 504(f) of the Act.

D. Monitoring Requirements

1. The Permittee shall monitor the opacity at each poi nt where emissions are vented from Kiln 4/
In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill in acco rdance with the following conditions:

a. The Permittee shall install, calibrate, main tain and continuously operate a continuous opacity monitor (COM) located at the following to continuously monitor the opacity.

(1) Downstream of the In-Line Raw Mill PM control device DC-431, and

(2) Downstream of the Coal Mill PM control device DC-453

.
The COM shall be installed , maintained, calibrated , and operated as required by Subpart A of 40 CFR Part 63 and according to PS-1 of Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 60

. [40 CFR 63.1350(c)(1) and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.c]

b. To remain in compliance, the opacity shall be maintained such that the 6-minute average opacity for any 6-minute block period does not exceed 20 percent. If the average opacity for any 6-minute block period exceeds 20 percent, this shall constitute a violation of the
standard. [40 CFR 63.1350(c)(3)]

2. The Permittee shall monitor opacity from the cli nker cooler at each point where emissions are
vented from the clinker cooler in accordance with the following conditions:

a. The Permittee shall install

, calibrate , maintain, and continuously operate a COM located at the outlet of the clinker cooler PM contro l device DC-445 to continuously monitor the opacity

. The COM shall be installed , maintained, calibrated , and operated as required by Subpart A of 40 CFR Part 63 and according to PS-1 of Appendix B to 40 CFR Part 60

. [40 CFR 63.1350(d)(1) and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.c]

b. To remain in compliance, the opacity shall be maintained such that the 6- minute average opacity for any 6-minute block period does not exceed 10 percent. If the average opacity for any 6-minute block period exceeds 10 percent, this shall constitute a violation of the
standard. [40 CFR 63.1350(d)(3)]

3. The Permittee shall monitor opacity from a ra w or finish mill by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and ai r separator particulate matter control devicesFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 25 1/31/07 (PMCDs) of the affected sources, as defined in 40 CFR 63.1340(b), in accordance with the procedures of EPA Reference Method 22. Th e EPA Reference Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is opera ting at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the EPA Reference Method 22
test shall be 6 minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any EPA Reference Method 22 visible emissions test, the Permittee must: [40 CFR 63.1350(e)]

a. Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and maintenance plan prescribed in A ttachment “E” of this Permit.

b. Within 24 hours of the end of the EPA Reference Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible
emissions were observed in accordance with EPA Reference Method 9. The duration of
the EPA Reference Method 9 test shall be 30 minutes.

c. The requirements to conduct daily Method 22 testing shall not apply to any specific raw mill or finish mill equipped with a con tinuous opacity monitor COM or bag leak detection system (BLDS). [40 CFR 63.1350(m) and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.c]
(1) The Permittee may choose to install a COM in lieu of conducting the daily visual emissions testing. The COM must be installed at the outlet of the PM control device of the raw mill or finish mill , and must be installed , maintained, calibrated , and operated as required by the general prov isions in 40 CFR 63, Subpart A and according to PS-1 of appendix B to 40 CFR Part 60 . To remain in compliance, the opacity must be maintained such that th e 6-minute average opacity for any 6-minute block period does not exceed 10 percent. If the average opacity for any 6-minute block period exceeds 10 percent, this sha ll constitute a violation of the standard.

(2) The Permittee may choose to install a BLDS in lieu of conducting the daily visual emissions testing. The following re quirements shall apply to each BLDS:
(a) The BLDS must be certified by the manuf acturer to be capable of detecting PM emissions at concentrations of 10 milligrams per actual cubic meter (0.0044 grains per actual cubic foot) or less . "Certify" shall mean that the instrument
manufacturer has tested the instrument on gas streams having a range of particle size distributions and confirme d by means of valid filterable PM tests
that the minimum detectable concentra tion limit is at or below 10 milligrams per actual cubic meter (0.0044 grains per actual cubic foot) or less;
(b) The sensor on the BLDS must provide output of relative PM emissions;
(c) The BLDS must have an alarm that will activate automatically when it detects a significant increase in relative PM emissions greater than a preset level;
(d) The presence of an alarm condition should be clearly apparent to facility operating personnel;
(e) For a positive-pressure fabric filter, each compartment or cell must have a bag leak detector. For a negative-pressure or induced-air fabric filter, the bag leak
detector must be installed downstream of the fabric filter. If multiple bag leak detectors are required (for either type of fabric filter), detectors may share the system instrumentation and alarm;
(f) All BLDS must be installed, operated, ad justed, and maintained so that they are based on the manufacturer's written specifications and recommendations. The EPA recommends that where appropriate , the standard operating procedures manual for each bag leak detection system include concepts from EPA's "Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance" (EPA-454/R-98-015, September 1997);
(g) The baseline output of the system must be established as follows:Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 26 1/31/07 i) Adjust the range and the averaging period of the device; and
ii) Establish the alarm set points and the alarm delay time.
(h) After initial adjustment, the range, averag ing period, alarm set points, or alarm delay time may not be adjusted excep t as specified in the operations and maintenance plan required by Condition III.C.2 above. In no event may the range be increased by more than 100 percent or decreased by more than 50 percent over a 1 calendar year period unless a responsible official as defined in 40 CFR 63.2 certifies in writing to the Director that the fabric filter has been inspected and found to be in good operating condition; and
(i) The Permittee must maintain and operate th e fabric filter such that the bag leak
detector alarm is not activated and alar m condition does not exist for more than 5 percent of the total operating time in a 6-month block period. Each time the alarm activates, alar m time will be counted as the actual amount of time taken by the Permittee to initiate corrective ac tions. If inspection of the fabric filter
demonstrates that no corrective actions are necessary, no alarm time will be counted. The Permittee must continuously record the output from the BLDS during periods of normal operation. No rmal operation does not include periods when the BLDS is being maintained or during startup, shutdown or
malfunction.

(3) If a COM or BLDS is to be installed and operated in lieu of conducting the daily visual emissions testing, the Permittee shall furnish the Director and the Administrator written notification 30 days prior to such installation in addition to other notification requirements set forth in Condition III.H of this section.

4. The Permittee shall monitor D/F emissions in accordance with th e following conditions:
[40 CFR 63.1350(f)]

a. The Permittee shall install

, calibrate , maintain, and continuously operate a continuous
monitor to record th e temperature of the exhaust gases fr om the Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill system at the inlet to, or ups tream of, the in-line raw mill PM control
device DC-431

. [A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.c]
(1) The recorder response range must include zero and 1.5 times of the average temperatures established for each of the four different operating scenarios according to the requirements in Condition III.E.1.c(5) below.

(2) The reference method must be a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiome ter system or alternate reference, subject to approval by the Director.

b. The Permittee shall monitor and continuously r ecord the temperature of the exhaust gases
from the Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal M ill at the inlet to the In-Line Raw Mill PM
control device DC-431.

c. The three-hour rolling average temperature shall be calculated as the average of 180 successive one-minute average temperatures.

d. Periods of time when one-minute averages are not available shall be ignored when calculating three-hour rolling averages. When one-minute averages become available, the first one-minute average is added to th e previous 179 values to calculate the threehour rolling average.

e. When the operating status of the In-Line Ra w Mill is changed from off to on, or from on to off, the calculation of the three-hour ro lling average temperature for the corresponding equipment must begin anew, without considering previous recordings.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 27 1/31/07 f. The calibration of all thermocouples and other temperature sensors shall be verified at least once every three months.

5. The Permittee shall conduct an inspection of th e components of the combustion system of the Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill at least once per year. [40 CFR 63.1350(i)]

6. The Permittee shall monitor opaci ty in accordance with the Operation and Maintenance Plan
enclosed in Attachment “E” of this Permit. [40 CFR 63.1350(j)]

7. The Permittee shall install

, calibrate , maintain, and operate a particulate matter continuous emission monitoring system (PM CEMS) to meas ure the particulate matter discharged to the atmosphere . All requirements relating to installati on, calibration, maintenance, operation or performance of the PM CEMS and implementati on of the PM CEMS requirement are deferred pending further rulemaking. [40 CFR 63.1350(k) and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.c]

8. All continuous emissions monitoring systems shall meet the following requirements:

[A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c]

a. Monitoring performance specifications required by Conditions III.D above, 40 CFR 63.8(a)(1), and/or 40 CFR 63.8(b) through 40 CFR 63.8(g).

b. The Permittee shall maintain 90 percent data recovery on all the data obtained from the CEMS. Compliance with this data recovery requirement shall be determined based on total Kiln 4 operating time during a 365 day period.

c. All data gaps shall be filled with the averag e hourly concentration recorded by the CEMS for the hour immediately before and the hour immediately after the missing data period.

d. Instrument span shall be such that the exp ected output is 50 to 70 percent (1.5 times the average temperature established according to Condition III.E.1.c(5) below for temperature monitors) of span.

E. Testing Requirements

1. The Permittee shall demonstrate compliance with the emission limits of Conditions III.B.1.a and III.B.2 through III.B.5 of this Attachment by conducting the following test methods and procedures in accordance with th e frequency requirements set fo rth in Conditions III.E.2 and 3
of this Attachment and consistent with th e requirements set forth in 40 CFR 63.7 and in Section XVIII, Attachment “A” of this Permit: [40 CFR 63.1349(a) and A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c]

a. PM and Visual Emissions Testing Required for Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill
and Clinker Cooler

(1) For Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill, the Permittee shall demonstrate compliance by conducting separate performan ce tests as specified in Conditions III.E.1.a.(3) through III.E.1.a.(5) below while both In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 and Coal Mill RM-450 are under normal operati ng conditions and while In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 is not operating and Co al Mill RM-450 is under normal operating conditions. The performance tests shall be conducted such that the flue samples are
to be withdrawn from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and Coal Mill stack S-453 simultaneously. All performance tests sh all be conducted and operating parameters set in accordance with a site-specific t est plan required to be submitted by the Permittee and approved by the Director prior to the tests. [40 CFR 63.7(c) and 1349(b)(1)]
(2) For Clinker Cooler CC-404, the Permitte e shall demonstrate compliance by conducting a performance test as specified in Conditions III.E.1.a(3) through III.E.1.a(5) below. The performance test shall be conducted and operating parameters set in accordance with a site-sp ecific test plan required to be submitted by the Permittee and approved by the Director prior to the test.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 28 1/31/07 [40 CFR 63.7(c) and 1349(b)(1)]
(3) EPA Reference Method 5 shall be used to determine PM emissions. Each performance test shall consist of three sep arate runs under the conditions that exist when the affected source, as defined in 40 CFR 63.1340(b), is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably e xpected to occur. Each run shall be conducted for at least one hour, and the mi nimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall be used to determine compliance. A
determination of the PM collected in th e impingers (“back half”) of the EPA Reference Method 5 particulate sampling trai n is not required to demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards specifie d in Conditions III.B.1.a(1) and III.B.2.a
of this Attachment. However this sha ll not preclude the permitting authority from requiring a determination of the “back half” for other purposes. [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1)(i)]
(4) Suitable methods shall be used to determ ine the Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill feed rate, except for fuels, for each run. [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1)(ii)]
(5) The emission rate, E, of PM shall be computed for each run using the following equations: [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1)(iii)] (a) For Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill



### P Q C Q C E 453

- sd 453

- s 401

- sd 401

- s k 

### 



where:

E k = Kiln 4/in-line raw mill and coal mill PM emission rate, kg/Mg of kiln feed

C s-401 = In-line raw mill stack PM concentration, kg/dscm Q sd-401 = Volumetric flow rate of effluent gas at in-line raw mill stack, dscm/hr

C s-453 = Coal mill stack PM concentration, kg/dscm Q sd-453 = Volumetric flow rate of effluent gas at coal mill stack, dscm/hr P = Total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr
(b) For Clinker Cooler CC-404



### P Q C E 402

- sd 402

- s

c 

### 

where:

E
c = Clinker cooler stack PM emission rate, kg/Mg of kiln feed

C s-402 = Clinker cooler stack PM concentration, kg/dscm Q sd-402 = Volumetric flow rate of effluent gas at clinker cooler stack, dscm/hr P = Total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

(6) The Permittee shall determine the opacity e xhibited at each stack during the period of the EPA Reference Method 5 perfo rmance tests required by Condition III.E.1.a.(3) above through the use of a c ontinuous opacity monitor (COM) for that stack. The maximum six-minute average opacity during the three EPA Reference
Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each EPA Reference Method 5 test run, and used to demonstrate compliance with the applicable opacity limits of Condition III.B.1.a(2) or III.B.2.b above. [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1)(v)]

b. Opacity Testing for Other Affected Sources [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(2)]
(1) The Permittee shall demonstrate compliance of the following affected sources with the corresponding opacity limits by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 60:
(a) Raw Mill BM-301 and Swing Mill BM-302 when used for raw feed grinding;
(b) Finish Mills BM-303 and 304, OK Mill BM-305, and Swing Mill BM-302Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 29 1/31/07 when used for clinker grinding;
(c) Raw material dryers BM-301 and BM-302 when used for raw feed grinding;
(d) Each raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin;
(e) Each conveying system transfer point including those associated with coal preparation used to convey coal from the mill to the kiln; and
(f) Each bagging and bulk loading and unloading system.

(2) The opacity testing shall be conducted unde r the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the representative performance conditions in accordance with 40 CFR 63.7(e). The maxi mum 6-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to de termine whether the affected source is in compliance with the standard. The durati on of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3 hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1 hour if the following conditions apply:
(a) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity;
(b) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

c. D/F Emissions Testing Required for Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill

(1) The Permittee shall demonstrate complia nce with the D/F emission limit by conducting separate performance tests as speci fied in Conditions III.E.1.c(2) through III.E.1.c(5) below while In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 is under normal operating
conditions and while In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 is not operating. Flue samples shall
be withdrawn from In-Line Raw Mill stack S-401 and from Coal Mill stack S-453. All performance tests shall be conducted a nd operating parameters set in accordance with a site-specific test plan required to be submitted by the Permittee and approved by the Director prior to the tests. [40 CFR 63.7(c) and 63.1349(b)(3)]
(2) EPA Reference Method 23 shall be used to determine D/F emissions. Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs; each run shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the representative performance conditions in accordance with 40 CFR 63.7(e). The duration of each run shall be at least three hours and the sample volume for each run shall be at least 2.5 dscm (90 dscf). Th e concentration shall be determined for each run and the arithmetic average of the concen tration measured for the three runs shall be calculated and used to determine compliance. [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3)(i)]
(3) The temperature at the inlet to the In -Line Raw Mill PM control device DC-431 shall be continuously recorded during th e period of the EPA Reference Method 23 test, and the continuous temperature reco rd(s) shall be included in the performance
test report. [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3)(ii)]
(4) One-minute average temperatures shall be calculated for each minute of each run of
the test. [40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3)(iii)]
(5) The run average temperature shall be calcul ated for each run, and the average of the run average temperatures shall be determin ed and included in the performance test report and will determine as re ferenced in Condition III.B.1.b of this Attachment, the applicable exhaust temperature lim it while In-Line Raw Mill RM-306 is under normal operating conditions and while In-Lin e Raw Mill RM-306 is not operating.
[40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3)(iv)]

d. The Permittee shall document the performance t est results in and submit to the Director, complete test reports that contain the follow ing as well as all other relevant information:
[40 CFR 63.1349(a) and A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c]Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 30 1/31/07 (1) A brief description of the process and the air pollution control system;

(2) Sampling location description(s);

(3) A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modifications to standard procedures;

(4) Test results;

(5) Quality assurance procedures and results;

(6) Records of operating conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration procedures;

(7) Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses;

(8) Documentation of calculations;

(9) All data recorded and used to establish parameters for compliance monitoring; and

(10) Any other information required by the test method.

2. Except as provided in Condition III.E.5 below and at such other times as may be required by the Director, performance tests required under Condition III.E.1.a above shall be repeated every five years for the purpose of 40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL, and every year for the purpose of A.A.C. R18-2-312, except that the Permittee is not required to repeat the performance test of opacity for the Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Co al Mill or clinker cooler after the initial performance test completed within 180 days of issuance of this Permit.
[40 CFR 63.1349(c) and A.A.C. R18-2-312]

3. Performance tests required under Condition III.E.1.b above shall be repeated every five years and at such other times as may be required by the Director. [40 CFR 63.1349(c) and A.A.C. R18-2-312]

4. Except as provided in Condition III.E.5 below and at such other times as may be required by the Director, performance tests required under Condition III.E.1.c above shall be repeated every 30 months. [40 CFR 63.1349(d)]

5. The Permittee is required to repeat the perform ance tests for the Kiln 4/In-Line Raw Mill and Coal Mill system as specified in Conditions III.E. 1.a and c above within 90 days of initiating any significant change in the feed or fuel fro m that used in the previous performance test.
[40 CFR 63.1349(e)]

F. Recordkeeping Requirements

1. The Permittee shall maintain files of all inform ation (including all reports and notifications) required by this condition in a form suitable a nd readily available for inspection and review as required by 40 CFR 63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, main tenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on ma gnetic tape, or on microfiche. [40 CFR 63.1355(a)]

2. The Permittee shall maintain records for each affected source as required by 40 CFR 63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3) and the following: [40 CFR 63.1355(b)]

a. All documentation supporting initia l notifications and notifications of compliance status under 40 CFR 63.9;

b. All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

c. If the Permittee has been granted a waiv er under 40 CFR 63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether the source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of recordFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 31 1/31/07 keeping or reporting requirements.

3. For all continuous monitoring systems, the Permitt ee shall maintain all records required by 40 CFR 63.10(c) in addition to the recordkeep ing requirements in Condition III.F.2 above.
[40 CFR 63.1355(c)]

4. The Permittee shall maintain all records with regard to the startup, shutdown and malfunction events, as required under 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3). [40 CFR 63.6(e)(3)(iii), (iv) and (v)]

5. The Permittee shall maintain a file of all of the measurements including performance testing, continuous monitoring system performance eval uations, all continuous monitoring system or monitoring device calibration checks, and adju stments and maintenance performed on these systems or devices. This data shall be record ed in a permanent form suitable for inspection.

[A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.4]

G. Reporting Requirements

1. The reporting provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A that apply to the Permittee are listed in Table 1 to Subpart LLL in 40 CFR Part 63. [40 CFR 63.1354(a)]

2. The Permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements specified in 40 CFR 63.10 as
follows: [40 CFR 63.1354(b) and A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.5]

a. As required by 40 CFR 63.10(d)(2), the Perm ittee shall report the r esults of performance tests as part of the notification of compliance status.

b. As required by 40 CFR 63.10(d)(3), the Perm ittee shall report the opacity results from tests required by Condition III.E above.

c. As required by 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5), if actions taken by a Permittee during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including acti ons taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the Permittee’s startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan specified in 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3), the Permittee shall state such information in a semi-annual report. Repor ts shall only be required if a startup, shutdown, or malfunction occurred during the reporting period. The startup, shutdown, and malfunction report may be submitted simu ltaneously with the excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance reports.

d. Any time an action taken by the Permittee during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the Permittee shall make an immediate report of the actions taken for that event w ithin 2 working days, by telephone call or facsimile (fax) transmission. The immediate report shall be followed by a letter, certified by the Permittee, explaining the circumstances of the event, the reasons for not following the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, and whether any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances are believed to have occurred.

e. As required by 40 CFR 63.10(e)(2), the Pe rmittee shall submit a written report of the results of the performance evaluation for th e continuous monitoring system required by 40 CFR 63.8(e). The Permittee shall submit the report simultaneously with the results of the performance test.

f. As required by 40 CFR 63.10(e)(2), the Pe rmittee, when using a continuous opacity monitoring system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test required under 40 CFR 63.7 and described in 40 CFR 63.6( d)(6), shall report the results of the continuous opacity monitoring system pe rformance evaluation conducted under 40 CFR 63.8(e).

g. As required by 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3), for any affected source equipped with a continuousFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 32 1/31/07 emission monitor, the Permittee shall s ubmit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data indicate the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter limit.

h. The Permittee shall submit a summary repor t semiannually along with the compliance certification, which contains the informati on specified in 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)(vi). In addition, the summary report shall include:

(1) All exceedances of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits specified in Condition III.B.1.b of this Attachment;

(2) All failures to calibrate thermocouples a nd other temperature sensors as required under Condition III.D.4 of this Attachment;

(3) The results of any combustion system com ponent inspections conducted within the reporting period as required under Conditi on III.D.5 of this Attachment; and

(4) All failures to comply with any provisi on of the Operation and Maintenance Plan prescribed in Attachment “E” of this Permit.

(5) All startup, shutdown and malfunction even ts required to be reported under 40 CFR 63.6(e).

i. If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is 10 percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the Permittee shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report along with the summary report.

H. Notification Requirements

1. The notification provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A that apply to the Permittee are listed in Table 1 to Subpart LLL in 40 CFR Part 63. [40 CFR 63.1353(a)]

2. The Permittee shall comply with the notifica tion requirements in 40 CFR 63.9 as follows:
[40 CFR 63.1353(b)]

a. Initial notifications as required by 40 CFR 63.9( b) through (d). A Title V permit may be used in lieu of the initial notification requirement under 40 CFR 63.9(b), provided the same information is contained in the permit application as required by 40 CFR 63.9(b). Permit applications shall be submitted by the same due dates as those specified for the final notification;

b. Notification of performance tests, as required by 40 CFR 63.7 and 63.9(e);

c. Notification of opacity and visible emission observations required by Condition III.E above in accordance with 40 CFR 63.6(h)(5) and Part 63.9(f);

d. Notification, as required by 40 CFR 63.9(g), of the date that the continuous emission monitor performance evaluation required by 40 CFR 63.8(e) is scheduled to begin;

e. Notification of compliance status, as required by 40 CFR 63.9(h).

I. Permit Shield [A.A.C. R18-2-325]
Compliance with the terms of this Section sh all be deemed compliance with the following applicable requirement(s) in effect on the da te of permit issuance: 40 CFR 63.1343(b), 40 CFR 63.1344(a)(1), 40 CFR 63.1344(a)(2), 40 CFR 63.1344(b), 40 CFR 63.1345(a), 40 CFR 63.1346(a), 40 CFR 63.1347, 40 CFR 63.1348, 40 CFR 63.1349 (a), 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1), 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1)(i) through 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1)(iii), 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1)(v), 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3), 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3)(i) through 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3)(iv), 40 CFR 63.1349(c), 40Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 33 1/31/07 CFR 63.1349(d), 40 CFR 63.1349(e), 40 CFR 63.1350(a), 40 CFR 63.1350(b), 40 CFR 63.1350(c), 40 CFR 63.1350(c)(1), 40 CFR 63.1350(c)(3), 40 CFR 63.1350(d), 40 CFR 63.1350(d)(1), 40 CFR 63.1350(d)(3), 40 CFR 63.1350(e), 40 CFR 63.1350(f), 40 CFR 63.1350(i), 40 CFR 63.1350(j), 40 CFR 63.1353(a), 40 CFR 63.1353(b), 40 CFR 63.1354(a), 40 CFR 63.1354(b), 40 CFR 63.1355(a) through 40 CFR 63.1355(c).

IV. QUARRY AND RAW MATERIAL CRUSHING

A. Non-New Source Performance Standards (non-NSPS) Requirements

1. Applicability [A.A.C. R18-2-702.A]

The conditions of this subsection apply to each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or railcar loading station which was constructed before A ugust 31, 1983, or which was constructed after August 31, 1983 but with a primary crushe r capacity less than 150 tons per hour.

2. Particulate Matter Emission Limitations/Standards

a. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit the discharge of particulate matter into the atmosphere, except as fugitive emissions, in any one hour from any gravel or crushed stone processing plant, in excess of the amounts calculated by one of the following equations: [A.A.C. R18-2-722.B]
(1) For sources having a process weight rate of 60,000 pounds per hour (30 tons per hour) or less, the maximum allowable emissions shall be determined by the following equation:

E = 4.10P 0.67

where: E = the maximum allowable particulat e emissions rate in pounds-mass per hour P = the process weight rate in tons-mass per hour

(2) For sources having a process weight rate greater than 60,000 pounds per hour (30 tons per hour), the maximum allowable emissions shall be determined by the following equation:

E = 55.0P 0.11 – 40
where: E = the maximum allowable particulat e emissions rate in pounds-mass per hour P = the process weight rate in tons-mass per hour

b. The Permittee shall not cause or allow to be discharged into the atmosphere from the affected quarry operation, any plume or efflue nt which exhibits an opacity greater than 20%, as determined by Reference Method 9 in 40 CFR Part 60. [A.A.C. R18-2-702.B.2 and 3]

3. Air Pollution Control Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.2, -331.A.3.d, -331.A.3.e, and -722.D]

a. The Permittee shall install, maintain, and operate spray bars, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, to control visible emissions from crushing, screening, handling, transporting or conveying of material s, or other operations likely to result in significant amounts of airborne dust, or the mate rial shall be adequately wet to minimize visible emissions to the extent practicable.

b. Spray bar pollution controls shall be utilized in accordance with “EPA Control of Air Emissions from Process Operations in the Rock Crushing Industry” (EPA 340/1-79-002), “Wet Suppression System” (pages 15-34, ame nded as of January 1979 (and no future amendments or editions)), as incorporated herein by reference and on file with the OfficeFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 34 1/31/07 of the Secretary of State, with placement of spray bars and nozzles as required by the Director to minimize air pollution.

4. Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting Requirements

a. Bi-weekly Monitoring for Stack Sources [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and -306.A.5]
(1) Within 180 days of issuance of the Perm it, the Permittee shall conduct certified EPA Reference Method 9 performance tests in accordance with Section XVIII of
Attachment “A” for the stacks associated w ith the quarry, while operating at normal representative working conditions, to establis h a baseline opacity level for each of the stacks. Within 30 days of establishi ng the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the results to the Director.

(2) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly visual survey of visible
emissions from the stacks associated with the quarry when they are in operation. The Permittee shall keep a record of the na me of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.

(3) If the observer sees a plume that on an in stantaneous basis appears to exceed the baseline opacity level, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is less than the baseline opacity level, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceeds the baseline opacity level, but is less than the applicable opacity standard, the Pe rmittee shall adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or belo w the baseline opacity level. The observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation;
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation;
(c) Date and time when corrective action was taken; and
(d) Type of corrective action taken.

(6) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceed s the applicable opacity standard, then the Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level; and
(b) Report it as an excess emission for opacity.

(7) If corrective actions fail to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level, the Permittee shall adopt the following course of action:
(a) Document all corrective actions; and
(b) Initiate procedures to re-establish the baseline within forty eight hours in accordance with Condition IV.A.4.a(8) below.

(8) If necessitated by the results of the bi-w eekly monitoring, the Permittee may reestablish the baseline opacity level(s). Re- establishment of the baseline(s) shall be performed utilizing the same procedures used in setting up the initial baseline level(s). Within 30 days of re-establis hing the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the results to the Director. The re port shall also contain a description of the need for re-establishing the baseline(s).Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 35 1/31/07 b. Bi-weekly Monitoring for Fugitive Emissions [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and -306.A.5]
(1) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly visual survey of fugitive emissions from the quarry when it is in operation.

(2) If the observer, during the visual survey , does not see any plume from any fugitive
source that on an instantaneous basis a ppears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall keep a reco rd of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.

(3) If the observer sees a plume from a fugitive source that on an instantaneous basis appears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceed s the applicable opacity standard, the Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or e quipment to reduce opacity to below the opacity standard;
(b) Report it as excess emissions.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is l ess than the applicable opacity standard, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

c. The Permittee shall install, calibrate, mainta in, and operate monitoring devices which can be used to determine daily the process weight of gravel or crushed stone produced. The weighing devices shall have an accuracy of ±5% over their operating range.
[A.A.C. R18-2-722.F and -331.A.3.c]

d. The Permittee shall maintain daily records of the crushed material produced in tons.

[A.A.C. R18-2-722.G]

B. New Source performance Standards (NSPS) Requirements

1. Applicability [40 CFR 60.670(c)(2) and 60.670(e)]

The conditions of this subsection apply to each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or railcar loading station which was constructed after A ugust 31, 1983, and which has a primary crusher capacity of more than 150 tons per hour.

2. Standards for Particulate Matter [40 CFR 60.672 and R18-2-331.A.3.f]

a. The Permittee shall not cause to be dischar ged into the atmosphere from any transfer point on belt conveyors or from any other equipment any stack emissions which :
(1) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.05 g/dscm (0.022 gr/dscf); and

(2) Exhibit greater than 7 percent opacity

.
b. The Permittee shall not cause to be dischar ged into the atmosphere from any transfer point on belt conveyors or from any other a ffected facility any fugitive emissions which exhibit greater than 10 percent opacity , except as provided in Conditions IV.B.2.c, d and
e below.

c. The Permittee shall not cause to be discharge d into the atmosphere from any crusher, at which a capture system is not used, fugitive emissions which exhibit greater than 15 percent opacity

.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 36 1/31/07 d. Truck dumping of nonmetallic minerals into any screening operation, feed hopper, or crusher is exempt from the requirements of Condition IV.B.2.

e. If any transfer point on a conveyor belt or any other affected facility is enclosed in a building, then each enclosed affected facility must comply with the emission limits in Conditions IV.B.2.a, b and c a bove, or the building enclosing the affected facility or facilities must comply with the following emission limits:

(1) The Permittee shall not cause to be disch arged into the atmosphere from any building enclosing any transfer point on a conveyor belt or any other affected facility any visible fugitive emissions except emissi ons from a vent as defined in 40 CFR

60.671.

(2) The Permittee shall not cause to be discharge d into the atmosphere from any vent of any building enclosing any transfer point on a conveyor belt or any other affected facility emissions which exceed the stack emission limits in Condition IV.B.2.a
above.

f. The Permittee shall not cause to be dischar ged into the atmosphere from any baghouse that controls emissions from only an individual, enclosed storage bin, stack emissions which exhibit greater than 7 percent opacity

.

g. The Permittee shall comply with the emission limits in Condition IV.B.2.a above for any multiple storage bins with combined stack emissions.

h. The Permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere any visible emissions
from:

(1) Wet screening operations and subsequent scr eening operations, bucket elevators, and belt conveyors that process saturated materi al in the production line up to the next crusher, grinding mill or storage bin.

(2) Screening operations, bucket elevators, and belt conveyors in the production line downstream of wet mining operations, wh ere such screening operations, bucket elevators, and belt conveyors process saturated materials up to the first crusher, grinding mill, or storage bin in the production line.

3. Air Pollution Control Requirement [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.2, -331.A.3.d, and -331.A.3.e]

The Permittee shall install , maintain, and operate spray bars

, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, to control visible emissions from crushing, screening, handling, transporting or conveying of materials, or other operations likely to result in significant amounts of airborne dust, or the material shall be adequately wet to minimize visible emissions to the extent practicable

.

4. Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting Requirements A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and -306.A.5]

a. Bi-Weekly Monitoring for Stack Sources

(1) Within 180 days of issuance of this permit, the Permittee shall conduct certified Method 9 performance tests in accordance w ith Section XVIII of Attachment A for the stacks associated with the quarry, while operating at normal representative working conditions, to establish a baseline op acity level for each of the stacks. Within 30 days of establishing the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the
results to the Director.

(2) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly (once in two weeks) visual survey of visible emissions from the stacks associated with the quarry when they are in operation. The Permittee shall keep a reco rd of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 37 1/31/07 (3) If the observer sees a plume that on an in stantaneous basis appears to exceed the baseline opacity level, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is less than the baseline opacity level, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceeds the baseline opacity level, but is less than the applicable opacity standard, the Pe rmittee shall adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or belo w the baseline opacity level. The observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation;
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation;
(c) Date and time when corrective action was taken; and
(d) Type of corrective action taken.

(6) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceed s the applicable opacity standard, then the Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level; and
(b) Report it as an excess emission for opacity.

(7) If corrective actions fail to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level, the Permittee shall adopt the following course of action:
(a) Document all corrective actions; and
(b) Initiate procedures to re-establish the baseline within forty eight hours in accordance with Condition IV.B.4.a(8) below.

(8) If necessitated by the results of the bi-w eekly monitoring, the Permittee may reestablish the baseline opacity level(s). Re- establishment of the baseline(s) shall be performed utilizing the same procedures used in setting up the initial baseline level(s). Within 30 days of re-establis hing the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the results to the Director. The re port shall also contain a description of the need for re-establishing the baseline(s).

b. Bi-Weekly Monitoring for Fugitive Emissions

(1) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly (once in two weeks) visual survey of fugitive emissions from th e quarry when it is in operation.

(2) If the observer, during the visual survey , does not see any plume from any fugitive
source that on an instantaneous basis a ppears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall keep a reco rd of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.

(3) If the observer sees a plume from a fugitive source that on an instantaneous basis appears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume ex ceeds the applicable opacity standard, Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or e quipment to reduce opacity to below the opacity standard;Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 38 1/31/07 (b) Report it as excess emissions.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is l ess than the applicable opacity standard, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

5. Testing Requirements

a. In conducting the performance tests required in 40 CFR 60.8, the Permittee shall use as reference methods and procedures the test me thods in Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 60 or other methods and procedures as specified in Condition IV.B.5, except as provided in 40 CFR 60.8(b). Acceptable alternative met hods and procedures are given in Condition
IV.B.5.h below. [40 CFR 60.675(a)]

b. The Permittee shall determine compliance with the particulate matter standards in
Condition IV.B.2.a above as follows: [40 CFR 60.675(b)(2)]
(1) Method 5 or Method 17 shall be used to determine the particulate matter concentration. The sample volume shall be at least 1.70 dscm (60 dscf). For Method 5, if the gas stream being sampled is at ambient temperature, the sampling probe and filter may be operated without heater s. If the gas stream is above ambient temperature, the sampling probe and filter may be operated at a temperature high enough, but no higher than 121 °C (250 °F), to prevent water condensation on the
filter.

(2) Method 9 and the procedures in 40 CFR 60.11 shall be used to determine opacity.

c. In determining compliance with the particulat e matter standards in Conditions IV.B.2.b and c above, the Permittee shall use Method 9 an d the procedures in 40 CFR 60.11, with the following additions: [40 CFR 60.675(c)(1)]
(1) The minimum distance between the observer and the emission source shall be 4.57 meters (15 feet).

(2) The observer shall, when possible, select a position that minimizes interference from other fugitive emission sources (e.g., ro ad dust). The required observer position relative to the sun (Method 9, Section 2.1) must be followed.

(3) For facilities using wet dust suppression for particulate matter control, a visible mist is sometimes generated by the spray. The water mist must not be confused with particulate matter emissions and is not to be considered a visible emission. When a water mist of this nature is present, the observation of emissions is to be made at a point in the plume where the mist is no longer visible.

d. In determining compliance with the opacity of stack emissions from any baghouse that controls emissions only from an individual en closed storage bin under Condition IV.B.2.f above, using Method 9, the duration of the Me thod 9 observations shall be 1 hour (ten 6- minute averages). [40 CFR 60.675(c)(2)]

e. When determining compliance with the fug itive emissions standard for any facility described under Condition IV.B.2.b above, th e duration of the Method 9 observations may be reduced from 3 hours (thirty 6-minute averages) to 1 hour (ten 6-minute averages) only if the foll owing conditions apply: [40 CFR 60.675(c)(3)]
(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity; and

(2) There are no more than 3 readings of 10 percent for the 1-hour period.

f. When determining compliance with the fugitiv e emissions standard for any crusher atFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 39 1/31/07 which a capture system is not used as d escribed under Condition IV.B.2.c above, the duration of the Method 9 observations may be reduced from 3 hours (thirty 6-minute averages) to 1 hour (ten 6-minute averag es) only if the following conditions apply:
[40 CFR 60.675(c)(4)]
(1) There are no individual readings greater than 15 percent opacity; and

(2) There are no more than 3 readings of 15 percent for the 1-hour period.

g. In determining compliance with Condition IV.B.2.e above, the Permittee shall use Method 22 to determine fugitive emissions. The performance test shall be conducted
while all affected facilities inside the buildin g are operating. The performance test for each building shall be at least 75 minutes in duration, with each side of the building and the roof being observed for at least 15 minutes. [40 CFR 60.675(d)]

h. For the method and procedure of Condition IV.B.5.c above, if emissions from two or more facilities continuously interfere so that the opacity of fugitive emissions from an individual affected facility cannot be read, th e Permittee may use either of the following procedures as alternatives to the referen ce methods and procedures specified in this
Section: [40 CFR 60.675(e)]
(1) Use for the combined emission stream the highest fugitive opacity standard applicable to any of the individual aff ected facilities contributing to the emissions

stream.

(2) Separate the emissions so that the opacity of emissions from each affected facility
can be read.

i. If, after 30 days notice for an initially scheduled performance test, there is a delay (due to operational problems, etc.) in conducting any re-scheduled performance test required, the
Permittee shall submit a notice to the Director at least 7 days prior to any rescheduled performance test. [40 CFR 60.675(g)]
j. Initial Method 9 performance tests under 40 CFR 60.11 and Condition IV.B.5 of this subsection are not required for: [40 CFR 60.675(h)]
(1) Wet screening operations and subsequent scr eening operations, bucket elevators, and belt conveyors that process saturated materi al in the production line up to, but not including the next crusher, grinding mill or storage bin.

(2) Screening operations, bucket elevators, and belt conveyors in the production line downstream of wet mining operations, that process saturated materials up to the first crusher, grinding mill, or storage bin in the production line.

6. Notification Requirements

a. In order to comply with 40 CFR 60.670(d), the Permittee shall submit to the Director the following information about the existing facility being replaced and the replacement piece of equipment. [40 CFR 60.676(a)]
(1) For a crusher, grinding mill, bucket elevator , bagging operation, or enclosed truck or railcar loading station:
(a) The rated capacity in tons per hour of the existing facility being replaced; and
(b) The rated capacity in tons per hour of the replacement equipment.

(2) For a screening operation:
(a) The total surface area of the top screen of the existing screening operation being replaced; and
(b) The total surface area of the top screen of the replacement screening operation.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 40 1/31/07 (3) For a conveyor belt:
(a) The width of the existing belt being replaced; and
(b) The width of the replacement conveyor belt.

(4) For a storage bin:
(a) The rated capacity in tons of the existing storage bin being replaced; and
(b) The rated capacity in tons of replacement storage bins.

b. The Permittee shall submit written reports of the results of all performance tests conducted to demonstrate compliance with the standards set forth in Condition IV.B.2 of this subsection, including reports of opac ity observations made using Method 9 to demonstrate compliance with Conditions IV.B.2.b, c and f above, and reports of observations using Method 22 to demonstr ate compliance with Condition IV.B.2.e.
[40 CFR 60.676(f)]

c. The Permittee of any screening operation bucket elevator, or belt conveyor that processes saturated material and is subject to Conditio n IV.B.2.h above and subsequently processes unsaturated materials, shall submit a report of this change within 30 days following such change. This screening operation, bucket elevat or, or belt conveyor is then subject to the 10 percent opacity limit in Condition IV.B.2.b above and the emission test requirements
of 40 CFR 60.11 and of this Section. Likewi se a screening operation, bucket elevator, or belt conveyor that processes unsaturated materi al but subsequently processes saturated material shall submit a report of this change within 30 days following such change. This screening operation, bucket elevator, or belt conveyor is then subject to the no visible
emission limit in Condition IV.B.2.h above. [40 CFR 60.676(g)]

C. Permit Shield [A.A.C. R18-2-325]
Compliance with the terms of this Section sh all be deemed compliance with the following applicable requirement(s) in effect on the date of permit issuance: A.A.C. R18-2-702.B(1), A.A.C. R18-2-722.B, A.A.C. R18-2-722.D, A.A.C. R18-2-722.F, A.A.C. R18-2-722.G, 40 CFR 60.670(c)(2), 40 CFR 60.670(e), 40 CFR 60.672, 40 CFR 60.675(a), 40 CFR 60.675(b)(2), 40 CFR 60.675(c), 40 CFR 60.675(d), 40 CFR 60.675(e), 40 CFR 60.675(g), 40 CFR 60.675(h), 40 CFR 60.676(a), 40 CFR 60.676(f), and 40 CFR 60.676(g).

V. COAL PREPARATION OPERATIONS

A. Non-New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Standards

1. Applicability

A non-NSPS affected facility is defined as e ach coal processing and conveying equipment (including breakers and crushers), coal storage sy stems, and coal transfer and loading systems which has a capacity of less than 200 tons pe r day. For each non-NSPS affected facility identified in Attachment “C,” refer to the following applicable conditions.

2. Particulate Matter Emission Limitations/Standards

a. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit the discharge of particulate matter into the atmosphere, except as fugitive emissions, in an y one hour from any coal preparation plant equipment, in excess of the amounts calcula ted by one of the following equations:

[A.A.C. R18-2-716.B]
(1) For sources having a process weight rate of 60,000 pounds per hour (30 tons per hour) or less, the maximum allowable emissions shall be determined by the following equation:Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 41 1/31/07 E = 4.10P 0.67

where: E = the maximum allowable particulat e emissions rate in pounds-mass per hour P = the process weight rate in tons-mass per hour

(2) For sources having a process weight rate greater than 60,000 pounds per hour (30 tons per hour), the maximum allowable emissions shall be determined by the following equation:

E = 55.0P 0.11 – 40
where: E = the maximum allowable particulat e emissions rate in pounds-mass per hour P = the process weight rate in tons-mass per hour

b. For the purposes of Condition V.A.2 above, the total process weight from all similar units employing a similar type process shall be used in determining the maximum allowable emissions of particulate matter. [A.A.C. R18-2-716.D]

c. The Permittee shall not cause or allow to be discharged into the atmosphere from the affected coal preparation operation, any plume or effluent which exhibits an opacity greater than 20%, as determined by Reference Method 9 in 40 CFR Part 60.
[A.A.C. R18-2-702.B.2 and 3]

3. Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and -306.A.5]

a. Bi-weekly Monitoring for Stack Sources

(1) Within 180 days of issuance of this permit, the Permittee shall conduct certified Method 9 performance tests in accordance w ith Section XVIII of Attachment A for the stacks associated with the coal preparation operations, while operating at normal representative working conditions, to establis h a baseline opacity level for each of the stacks. Within 30 days of establishi ng the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the results to the Director.

(2) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly visual survey of visible
emissions from the stacks associated with th e coal preparation operations when they are in operation. The Permittee shall keep a record of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.

(3) If the observer sees a plume that on an in stantaneous basis appears to exceed the baseline opacity level, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is less than the baseline opacity level, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceeds the baseline opacity level, but is less than the applicable opacity standard, the Pe rmittee shall adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or belo w the baseline opacity level. The observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation;
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation;
(c) Date and time when corrective action was taken; and
(d) Type of corrective action taken.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 42 1/31/07 (6) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceed s the applicable opacity standard, then the Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level; and
(b) Report it as an excess emission for opacity.

(7) If corrective actions fail to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level, the Permittee shall adopt the following course of action:
(a) Document all corrective actions; and
(b) Initiate procedures to re-establish the baseline within forty eight hours in accordance with Condition V.A.3.a(8) below.

(8) If necessitated by the results of the bi-w eekly monitoring, the Permittee may reestablish the baseline opacity level(s). Re- establishment of the baseline(s) shall be performed utilizing the same procedures used in setting up the initial baseline level(s). Within 30 days of re-establis hing the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the results to the Director. The re port shall also contain a description of the need for re-establishing the baseline(s).

b. Bi-weekly Monitoring for Fugitive Emissions

(1) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly visual survey of fugitive emissions from the coal preparation operations when they are in operation.

(2) If the observer, during the visual survey , does not see any plume from any fugitive
source that on an instantaneous basis a ppears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall keep a reco rd of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.

(3) If the observer sees a plume from a fugitive source that on an instantaneous basis appears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume ex ceeds the applicable opacity standard, Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or e quipment to reduce opacity to below the opacity standard;
(b) Report it as excess emissions.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is l ess than the applicable opacity standard, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

B. New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Standards

1. Applicability [40 CFR 60.250]

An NSPS affected facility is defined as each coal processing and conveying equipment (including breakers and crushers), thermal dryer, coal storage systems, and coal transfer and loading systems which has a capacity of 200 t ons per day or more, and which commenced
construction or modification after October 24, 1974. For each NSPS affected facility identified in Attachment “C”, refer to the following applicable conditions.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 43 1/31/07 2. Particulate Matter Emission Limitations/Standards [40 CFR 60.252(c) and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.f]

a. On and after the date on which the performan ce test required to be conducted by 40 CFR 60.8 is completed, the Permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from Coal Mill RM-450, gases which :
(1) Contain particulate matter in excess of 0.070 g / cm (0.031 gr / cf).

(2) Exhibit 20 percent opacity or greater

.
b. On and after the date on which the performan ce test required to be conducted by 40 CFR 60.8 is completed, the Permittee shall not cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from any coal processing and conveying equipmen t, coal storage system, or coal transfer and loading system processing coal, gases which exhibit 20 percent opacity or greater

.

3. Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and -306.A.5]

a. The Permittee shall apply the COMS at Coal Mill stack S-453 required under Section III of this Attachment to monitor compliance with Condition V.B.2.a above.

b. The Permittee shall install

, calibrate , maintain, and continuously operate a monitoring device for the measurement of the temperature of the gas stream at the exit of the Coal
Mill RM-450 on a continuous basis

. The monitoring device shall be certified by the manufacturer to be accurate within ±1.7 °C (±3 °F) and recalibrated annually in accordance with procedures under 40 CFR 60.13(b)

. [40 CFR 60.253(a)(1) and 253(b) and A.A.C. R18-2-331.A.3.c]

c. Bi-Weekly Monitoring for Stack Sources

The Permittee shall implement the followi ng for all NSPS affected stack sources under Subsection V.B except for Coal Mill stack S-453:

(1) Within 180 days of issuance of this permit, the Permittee shall conduct certified Method 9 performance tests in accordance w ith Section XVIII of Attachment A for the stacks associated with the coal preparation operations, while operating at normal representative working conditions, to establis h a baseline opacity level for each of the stacks. Within 30 days of establishi ng the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the results to the Director.

(2) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly (once in two weeks) visual survey of visible emissions from the stack s associated with the coal preparation operations when they are in operation. Th e Permittee shall keep a record of the name of the observer, the date on which th e observation was made, and the results of
the observation.

(3) If the observer sees a plume that on an in stantaneous basis appears to exceed the baseline opacity level, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is less than the baseline opacity level, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceeds the baseline opacity level, but is less than the applicable opacity standard, the Pe rmittee shall adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or belo w the baseline opacity level. The observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation;Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 44 1/31/07 (b) The results of the Method 9 observation;
(c) Date and time when corrective action was taken; and
(d) Type of corrective action taken.

(6) If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceed s the applicable opacity standard, then the Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level; and
(b) Report it as an excess emission for opacity.

(7) If corrective actions fail to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level, the Permittee shall adopt the following course of action:
(a) Document all corrective actions; and
(b) Initiate procedures to re-establish the baseline within forty eight hours in accordance with Condition V.B.3.c(8) below.

(8) If necessitated by the results of the bi-w eekly monitoring, the Permittee may reestablish the baseline opacity level(s). Re- establishment of the baseline(s) shall be performed utilizing the same procedures used in setting up the initial baseline level(s). Within 30 days of re-establis hing the baseline opacity, the Permittee shall report the results to the Director. The re port shall also contain a description of the need for re-establishing the baseline(s).

d. Bi-Weekly Monitoring for Fugitive Emissions

(1) A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a bi-weekly (once in two weeks) visual survey of fugitive emissions from the coal preparation operations when they are in operation.

(2) If the observer, during the visual survey , does not see any plume from any fugitive
source that on an instantaneous basis a ppears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall keep a reco rd of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.

(3) If the observer sees a plume from a fugitive source that on an instantaneous basis appears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

(4) If the six-minute opacity of the plume ex ceeds the applicable opacity standard, Permittee shall do the following:
(a) Adjust or repair the controls or e quipment to reduce opacity to below the opacity standard;
(b) Report it as excess emissions.

(5) If the six-minute opacity of the plume is l ess than the applicable opacity standard, the observer shall make a record of the following:
(a) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and
(b) The results of the Method 9 observation.

4. Test methods and procedures [40 CFR 60.254(b)]

The Permittee shall conduct performance tests on ce every five years as follows to determine compliance with the particular matter sta ndards set forth in Condition V.B.2 above:

a. EPA Reference Method 5 shall be used to dete rmine the particulate matter concentration. The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.85Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 45 1/31/07 dscm (30 dscf). Sampling shall begin no l ess than 30 minutes after startup and shall terminate before shutdown procedures begin.

b. EPA Reference Method 9 and the procedures in 40 CFR 60.11 shall be used to determine opacity.

c. The testing results from Section III of this Att achment may be used to satisfy the testing requirement under this Section.

C. Permit Shield [A.A.C. R18-2-325]
Compliance with the terms of this Section sh all be deemed compliance with the following applicable requirement(s) in effect on the date of permit issuance: 40 CFR 60.252(c), A.A.C. R18- 2-716.B, and A.A.C. R18-2-716.D.

VI. COOLING TOWERS AND OTHER UNCLASSIFIED POINT SOURCES

A. Applicability

Section VI applies to cooling to wers and all other point sources wh ich are not subject to conditions required under Sections II through V above.

B. Particulate Matter Emission Limitations/Standards

1. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit the discharge of particulate matter into the atmosphere, except as fugitive emissions, in an y one hour from Cooling Towers in excess of the amounts calculated by one of the following equations: [A.A.C. R18-2-730.A]

a. For sources having a process weight rate of 60,000 pounds per hour ( 30 tons per hour) or less, the maximum allowable emissions shall be determined by the following equation:

E = 4.10P 0.67

where: E = the maximum allowable particulat e emissions rate in pounds-mass per hour P = the process weight rate in tons-mass per hour

b. For sources having a process weight rate gr eater than 60,000 pounds per hour (30 tons per hour), the maximum allowable emissions shall be determined by the following equation:

E = 55.0P 0.11 – 40
where: E = the maximum allowable particulat e emissions rate in pounds-mass per hour P = the process weight rate in tons-mass per hour

2. For the purposes of Condition VI.B.1 above, the total process weight from all similar units employing a similar type process shall be used in determining the maximum allowable emission of particulate matter. [A.A.C. R18-2-730.B]

3. The Permittee shall not emit gaseous or odorous ma terials in such quantities or concentrations as to cause air pollution. [A.A.C. R18-2-730.D]

4. The Permittee shall not cause or allow to be discharged into the atmosphere from Cooling Towers and if applicable, other affected point s ources, any plume or effluent which exhibits an opacity greater than 20%, as determined by Reference Method 9 in 40 CFR Part 60.
[A.A.C. R18-2-702.B.2 and 3]Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 46 1/31/07 C. Monitoring, Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.a and -306.A.4]
The Permittee shall implement the following for Cooling Towers 1 through 3 and other miscellaneous point source emissions: [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and -306.A.5]

1. Within 180 days of issuance of the Perm it, the Permittee shall conduct certified EPA Reference Method 9 performance tests in accord ance with Section XVIII of Attachment “A” for all affected point sources subject to this section, while operating at normal representative working conditions, to establish a baseline opacity level for each of the point sources. Within 30 days of establishing the baseline opacity, th e Permittee shall report the results to the
Director.

2. A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a monthl y visual survey of visible emissions from each affected point source subject to this secti on when it is in operation. The Permittee shall keep a record of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and
the results of the observation.

3. If the observer sees a plume that on an instan taneous basis appears to exceed the baseline opacity level, then the observer shall, if prac ticable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

4. If the six-minute opacity of the plume is less th an the baseline opacity level, the observer shall make a record of the following:

a. Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and

b. The results of the Method 9 observation.

5. If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceeds the baseline opacity level, but is less than the applicable opacity standard, the Permittee shall ad just or repair the controls or equipment to reduce opacity to or below the baseline opacity le vel. The observer shall make a record of the following:

a. Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation;

b. The results of the Method 9 observation;

c. Date and time when corrective action was taken; and

d. Type of corrective action taken.

6. If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceeds the applicable opacity standard, then the Permittee shall do the following:

a. Adjust or repair the controls or equipmen t to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level; and

b. Report it as an excess emission for opacity.

7. If corrective actions fail to reduce opacity to or below the baseline level, the Permittee shall adopt the following course of action:

a. Document all corrective actions; and

b. Initiate procedures to re-establish the baseline within forty eight hours in accordance with
Condition VI.C.8 below.

8. If necessitated by the results of the monthly monitoring, the Permittee may re-establish the baseline opacity level(s). Re-establishment of the baseline(s) shall be performed utilizing the same procedures used in setting up the initial b aseline level(s). Within 30 days of reestablishing the baseline opacity, the Permittee shal l report the results to the Director. The report shall also contain a description of th e need for re-establishing the baseline(s).Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 47 1/31/07 D. Permit Shield [A.A.C. R18-2-325]
Compliance with the terms of this Section sh all be deemed compliance with the following applicable requirement(s) in effect on the date of permit issuance: A.A.C. R18-2-702.B(1), A.A.C. R18-2-730.A, A.A.C. R18-2-730.B, and A.A.C. R18-2-730.D.

VII. FUGITIVE DUST SOURCES

A. Applicability

The conditions of this Section a pply to fugitive dust sources for the plant operation. A fugitive dust source means any source of air contaminants which, due to lack of an identifiable emission point or plume, cannot be considered a point sour ce. For the purposes of this Section, conveyor transfer points shall be consider ed to have identifiable plumes.

B. Emission Limitations/Standards

1. Dust Control Plan [A.A.C. R18-2-306.01.A]

The Permittee shall operate the facility in accord ance with Dust Control Plan, Attachment “D”
of this Permit.

2. Open Areas, Dry Washes, or Riverbeds [A.A.C. R18-2-604.A and -604.B]

a. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit a building or its appurtenances, or a building or subdivision site, or a driveway, or a parking area, or a vacant lot or sales lot, or an urban or suburban open area to be cons tructed, used, altered, repaired, demolished, cleared, or leveled, or the earth to be moved or excavated without taking reasonable precautions to limit excessive amounts of particulate matter from becoming airborne.

b. Dust and other types of air contaminants shall be kept to a minimum by good modern practices such as using an approved dust s uppressant or adhesive soil stabilizer, paving, covering, landscaping, continuous wetting, de touring, barring access, or other acceptable

means.

c. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit a vacant lot, or an urban or suburban open area, to be driven over or used by motor ve hicles, trucks, cars, cycles, bikes, or buggies, or by animals such as horses, without taking reasonable precautions to limit excessive amounts of particulates from becoming airborne.

3. Roadways and Streets

a. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or pe rmit the use, repair, construction or reconstruction of a roadway or alley without taking reasonable precautions to prevent excessive amounts of particulate matter from becoming airborne. Dust and other particulates shall be kept to a minimum by employing temporary paving, dust suppressants, wetting down, detouring or by other reasonable means. [A.A.C. R18-2-605.A]

b. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit transportation of materials likely to give rise to airborne dust without taking reasonabl e precautions, such as wetting, applying dust suppressants, or covering the load, to prevent particulate matter from becoming airborne.
Earth or other material shall be removed from paved streets onto which earth or other material has been transported by trucking or earth moving equipment, erosion by water, or by other means. [A.A.C. R18-2-605.B]

c. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit the cleaning of any site, roadway, or alley without taking reasonable precautions to prevent particulate matter from becoming airborne. Reasonable precautions may include applying dust suppressants. Earth or otherFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 48 1/31/07 material shall be removed from paved streets onto which earth or other material has been transported by trucking or earth moving equipm ent, erosion by water, or by other means.

[A.A.C. R18-2-804.B]

4. Material Handling [A.A.C. R18-2-606]

The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit cr ushing, screening, handling, transporting, or conveying of materials or other operations likely to result in significant amounts of airborne dust without taking reasonable precautions, such as the use of spray bars, wetting agents, dust suppressants, covering the load, and hoods to pr event excessive amounts of particulate matter from becoming airborne.

5. Storage Piles [A.A.C. R18-2-607]

a. The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit organic or inorganic dust producing material to be stacked, piled, or otherwi se stored without taking reasonable precautions such as chemical stabilization, wetting, or covering to prevent excessive amounts of particulate matter from becoming airborne.

b. Stacking and reclaiming machinery utilized at storage piles shall be operated at all times
with a minimum fall of material and in such manner, or with the use of spray bars and wetting agents, as to prevent excessive amounts of particulate matter from becoming
airborne.

6. Evaluation of Fugitive Dust Source Emissions [A.A.C. R18-2-614]

Opacity of an emission from any fugitive dust source shall not be greater than 40% measured
in accordance with EPA Reference Method 9.

7. Open Burning [A.A.C. R18-2-602]

Except as provided in A.A.C. R18-2-602.C(1), C(3), and C(4), and except when permitted to do so by either ADEQ or the local officer delegated the authority for issuance of open burning permits, the Permittee shall not conduct open burning.

C. Monitoring, Record Keeping, and Reporting Requirements [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.a]

1. Daily Monitoring for Fugitive Dust Emissions [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c and -306.A.5]

a. A certified Method 9 observer shall conduct a daily visual survey of fugitive dust emissions when the facility is operating.

b. If the observer, during the visual survey, does not see any plume from any fugitive dust source that on an instantaneous basis appears to exceed the applicable opacity standard, then the observer shall keep a record of the name of the observer, the date on which the observation was made, and the results of the observation.

c. If the observer sees a plume from a fugitive dus t source that on an instantaneous basis appears to exceed the applicable opacity standa rd, then the observer shall, if practicable, take a six-minute Method 9 observation of the plume.

d. If the six-minute opacity of the plume exceed s the applicable opacity standard, the Permittee shall do the following:

(1) Adjust or repair the controls or equipm ent to reduce opacity to below the opacity standard;

(2) Report it as excess emissions.

e. If the six-minute opacity of the plume is less than the applicable opacity standard, the observer shall make a record of the following:Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 49 1/31/07 (1) Name of the observer, location, date, and time of the observation; and

(2) The results of the Method 9 observation.

2. The Permittee shall maintain records of the da tes on which any of the activities listed in Conditions VIII.B.2 through VIII.B.7 above were performed and all control measures which were employed. [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.4]

3. The Permittee shall maintain copies of all open burning permits on file. [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.4]

D. Permit Shield [A.A.C. R18-2-325]
Compliance with the terms of this Section sh all be deemed compliance with the following applicable requirement(s) in effect on the date of permit issuance: A.A.C. R18-2-602, A.A.C. R18- 2-604, A.A.C. R18-2-605, A.A.C. R18-2-606, A.A.C. R18-2-607, A.A.C. R18-2-614, and A.A.C.

R18-2-804.

VIII. OTHER PERIODIC ACTIVITIES

A. Emission Limitations/Standards

1. Abrasive Blasting

a. The Permittee shall not cause or allow sandbl asting or other abrasive blasting without minimizing dust emissions to the atmosphere through the use of good modern practices. Good modern practices include: [A.A.C. R18-2-726]
(1) Wet blasting;

(2) Effective enclosures with necessary dust collecting equipment; or

(3) Any other method as approved by the Director.

b. The Permittee shall not cause to be discharge d into the atmosphere from sandblasting or other abrasive blasting operations any emis sions greater than 40 percent opacity until April 23, 2006, after which, the opacity of any plume or effluent shall not be greater than 20 percent. [A.A.C. R18-2-702.B.2 and R18-2-702.B.3]

2. Use of Paints

While performing spray painting operations th e Permittee shall comply with the following requirements:

a. The Permittee shall not conduct any spray pain ting operation without minimizing organic solvent emissions. Such operations other th an architectural coating and spot painting shall be conducted in an enclosed area equi pped with controls containing no less than 96 percent of the overspray. [A.A.C. R18-2-727.A]

b. The Permittee shall not either: [A.A.C. R18-2-727.B]
(1) Employ, apply, evaporate or dry any architectural coating containing photochemically reactive solvents for i ndustrial or commercial purposes; or

(2) Thin or dilute any architectural coating with a photo-chemically reactive solvent.

c. For the purposes of part b. and e. of this condition, a photo-chemically reactive solvent shall be any solvent with an aggregate of more than 20 percent of its total volume composed of the chemical compounds classified in paragraphs (1) through (3) of this subsection, or which exceeds any of the following percentage composition limitations,
referred to the total volume of solvent: [A.A.C. R18-2-727.C]Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 50 1/31/07 (1) A combination of the following types of compounds having an olefinic or cycloolefinic type of unsaturation - hydrocarbons, alcohols, aldehydes, esters, ethers, or ketones: five percent

(2) A combination of aromatic compounds with eight or more carbon atoms to the molecule except ethylbenzene: eight percent

(3) A combination of ethylbenzene, keton es having branched hydrocarbon structures, trichloroethylene or toluene: twenty percent.

d. Whenever any organic solvent or any constituen t of an organic solvent may be classified
from it’s chemical structure into more th an one of the groups or organic compounds described in subsection c(1) through c(3) of th is condition, it shall be considered to be a member of the group having the least allowabl e percent of the total volume of solvents.

[A.A.C. R18-2-727.D]

e. The Permittee shall not dispose by evapor ation more than 1.5 gallons of photochemically reactive solvent in any one day. [SIP Provision R9-3-527.C]

3. Surface Coating Operations [A.A.C R18-2-730.L]

a. The Permittee shall not operate any surface coating application systems that emits volatile organic compounds in excess of the following:

(1) 4.3 pounds per gallon (0.5 kilograms per liter) of coating, excluding water, delivered to a coating applicator that applies clear coatings.

(2) 3.5 pounds per gallon (0.42 kilograms pe r liter) of coating, excluding water, delivered to a coating applicator in a coati ng application system that is air dried or forced warm air dried at temperatures up to 194 °F (90 °C).

(3) 3.5 pounds per gallon (0.42 kilograms pe r liter) of coating, excluding water, delivered to a coating applicator that applies extreme performance coatings.

(4) 3.0 pounds per gallon (0.36 kilograms pe r liter) of coating, excluding water, delivered to a coating applicator for all other coatings and application systems.

b. If more than one emission limitation in paragr aph XI.A.3.a above applies to a specific coating, then the least stringent emissions limitation shall be applied.

c. All VOC emissions from solvent washings shall be considered in the emissions limitations listed in paragraph XI.A.3.a above, unless the solvent is directed to containers that prevent evaporation to the atmosphere.

4. Vapor Extractors

Materials including solvents or other volatile compounds shall be processed, stored, used and transported in such a manner and by such mean s that they will not evaporate, leak, escape or be otherwise discharged into the ambient air so as to cause or contribute to air pollution.
Where means are available to reduce effectiv ely the contribution to air pollution from evaporation, leakage or discharge, the installati on and use of such control methods, devices, or equipment shall be mandatory. [A.A.C. R18-2-730.F]

5. Landfill Operations

The Permittee shall not emit gaseous or odorous ma terials from the landfill operations in such quantities or concentrations to cause air pollution. [A.A.C. R18-2-730.D]

6. Mobile Sources

a. ClassificationFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 51 1/31/07 The requirements of this condition are appli cable to mobile sources which either move while emitting air contaminants or are freque ntly moved during the course of their
utilization but are not classified as motor vehicles, agricultural vehicles, or are agricultural equipment used in normal farm operations. Mobile sources shall not include portable sources as defined in A.A.C. R18-2-101.84. [A.A.C. R18-2-801]

b. Roadway and Site Cleaning Machinery

The Permittee shall not cause, allow, or permit to be emitted into the atmosphere from any roadway and site cleaning machinery smoke or dust for any period greater than ten consecutive seconds, the opacity of which exceed s 40 percent. Visible emissions when starting cold equipment shall be exempt from this requirement for the first ten minutes.

[A.A.C. R18-2-804.A]

7. Demolition/Renovation

The Permittee shall comply with the appli cable requirements of 40 CFR 61 Subpart M (National Emissions Standards for Haza rdous Air Pollutants - Asbestos). [A.A.C. R18-2-1101.A.8]

B. Monitoring, Recordkeeping, and Reporting [A.A.C. R18-2-306.A.3.c]

1. Abrasive Blasting

Each time an abrasive blasting project is conduc ted, the Permittee shall log in ink or in an electronic format, a record of the following:

a. The date the project was conducted;

b. The duration of the project; and

c. Type of control measures employed.

2. Use of Paints

a. Each time a spray painting project is conducte d, the Permittee shall log in ink or in an electronic format, a record of the following:

(1) The date the project was conducted;

(2) The duration of the project;

(3) Type of control measures employed; and

(4) Material Safety Data Sheets for all pain ts and solvents used in the project.

b. Architectural coating and spot painting project s shall be exempt from the recordkeeping requirements of Condition IX.B.2.a above.

3. Surface coating activities

a. The Permittee shall log in ink or keep in an electronic format records of the following:

(1) The date the project was conducted;

(2) The duration of the project;

(3) Type of control measures employed

(4) Amount of surface coating used for the project

(5) Copies of the material safety and data sheets (MSDS) for each surface coating applied.

b. The Permittee shall use vendor provided inform ation to ensure that the surface coating materials being used satisfy th e standards in Condition IX.A.3.a above. In the absence ofFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 52 1/31/07 vendor provided information, the Permittee sh all perform engineering calculations using the density and VOC content of the surface coating in order to compare against the
standards set forth in Condition IX.A.3.a above.

4. Mobile Sources

The Permittee shall keep a record of all emis sions related maintenance activities performed on the Permittee's mobile sources stationed at the facility as per manufacturer’s specifications.

5. Demolition/Renovation

The Permittee shall keep all required records in a file. The required records include the
ANESHAP Notification for Renovation and Demo lition Activities form and all supporting
documents.

C. Permit Shield [A.A.C. R18-2-325]
Compliance with this Section shall be deemed compliance with A.A.C. R18-2-702.B.2, R18-2- 702.B.3, R18-2-726, R18-2-727.A, R18-2-727.B, R18-2-727.C, R18-2-727.D, SIP Provision R9-3- 527.C, R18-2-730.D, R18-2-730.F, and R18-2-730.L, and R18-2-1101.A.8.

IX. AMBIENT MONITORI NG REQUIREMENTS

A. This Section is not based on a federal applicab le requirement and is state-enforceable only.

[A.A.C. R18-2-306.B.2]

B. PM 10 Monitoring

The Permittee shall maintain and operate ambient PM 10 samplers at two sites previously approved by the Director. The network shall co mply with the following requirements:

1. General Requirements

a. Samplers: R&P Partisol dichot omous samplers, or equivale nt Federal Reference Method (FRM) or Federal Equivalent Method (FEM) samplers approved by USEPA.

b. Particle sizes to be measured: fine and coarse.

2. Location of PM 10 Sites and Sampling Frequency

a. Site locations for the PM 10 samplers shall remain the same as approved previously by ADEQ. If the Department concludes that other locations are preferable and feasible at a future date, the site loca tions shall be changed.

b. Samples shall be collected on the national 6- day midnight to midnight sampling schedule. In the event that one of the three sample rs malfunctions during a scheduled 24-hour period, special 24-hour samples using all three samplers shall be collected (regardless of the 6-day sampling schedule) starting as soon as practicable after th e correction of the malfunction problem.

c. Sampling, as may be required by the Department during a facility upset or failure of air pollution control equipment, shall supersede the normal 6-day sampling schedule.

3. Sample Laboratory Analysis

a. A laboratory analysis shall be performed on both fine and coarse filter for three samples, one with the highest total PM 10 mass, one with the lowest PM 10 mass, and one with the

PM 10 mass closest to the average of the quarter. The laboratory analysis shall be done in accordance with applicable sections and appendi ces of the most current version of 40 CFR Parts 50 and 58 and Quality Assura nce Handbook for Air Pollution MeasurementFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 53 1/31/07 Systems, Volume II, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

b. Each sample in the two size ranges shall be weighed and their concentrations calculated, totaled, and then reported as 24- hour concentrations of total PM 10 in standard micrograms per cubic meter. The results for each of the two size ranges shall also be reported.

c. The following elemental mass concentrations shall be determined and recorded as 24- hour average concentrations expressed as microgram per cubic meter: Aluminum (Al), Arsenic (As), Barium (Ba), Beryllium (Be), Cadmium (Cd), Calcium (Ca), Chlorine (Cl), Chromium (Cr), Copper (Cu), Iron (Fe), L ead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Mercury (Hg), Nickel (Ni), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Selenium (Se), Silicon (Si), Sodium (Na), Strontium (Sr), Sulfur (S), Titanium (Ti), Vanadium (V), Zinc (Zn), Zirconium (Zr).

4. Quality Assurance

a. All samplers shall be operated, calibrated, and maintained in accordance with the procedures set forth in the respective ma nufacturer’s instruction manuals and in accordance with applicable sections and appendi ces of the most current version of 40 CFR Parts 50 and 58 and Quality Assura nce Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume II, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The samplers shall be sited, maintained, and operated in accordance with the applicable requirements of Appendix J of 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 58, and Appendix E of 40 CFR Part 58.

b. The Permittee shall maintain, calibrate , and operate a se cond dichotomous PM 10 sampler of the same brand and model as is currently re quired. This second unit shall be used to concurrently measure PM 10 at one of the sites in operation. These collocated samplers shall be operated on the same sampling schedule to determine PM 10 precision for the PCC particulate monitoring network. PM 10 precision data shall be calculated and reported as required by Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 58.

c. The Permittee shall conduct performance aud its of the monitoring equipment in accordance with the requirements pertaini ng to sampler accuracy as specified in Appendix A of 40 CFR Part 58. The perfo rmance audits shall be conducted by a qualified independent auditor under contract to the Permittee at least once a year.

d. The Permittee shall conduct technical system s audits of its ambient air monitoring program consistent with the latest revision of the applicable sections of the Quality
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measu rement Systems, Volume II, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The technical systems audits shall be conducted by a qualified independent auditor under contract to the Permittee at least once in every three (3) years.

e. The Permittee shall also participate in technical systems audits and/or performance audits periodically conducted by the Department. Su ch audits conducted by the Department may substitute for the audits required of the Permittee corresponding to that frequency period.

5. Data Reduction

a. The Permittee shall calculate the quarterly and annual summary statistics for PM 10 data in accordance with procedures in the most recent revision of 40 CFR Part 50 Appendix K.

b. The Permittee shall calculate the precision and accuracy statistics in accordance with procedures in the most recent revision of 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix A.

c. Valid data recovery shall meet the EPA minimum data completeness requirement of 75 percent or the percentage specified in the a pplicable sections of the most recent revision
of 40 CFR Part 50.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 54 1/31/07 (1) Valid data shall refer to all observations collected for the specific monitoring

purpose;
(2) For filter based (non-continuous) measuremen ts, data completeness shall be based on quarterly data recovery.

6. Reports and Data Submittal

a. The Permittee shall submit to the Director, qu arterly and annual reports pertaining to the

PM 10 measurements and the quality control and assurance (QA/QC) data collected pursuant to this section. The quarterly and annual reporting schedule should follow the current EPA reporting schedule as described in 40 CFR 58.35. Summary data and reporting frequencies shall be consistent with EPA reporting requirements; the frequency of reporting and the due date depends on type of data. Tw o copies of the quarterly and annual reports should be mailed, one to the Air Assessment Section and the other to the Compliance Section of the Air Quality Division of ADEQ.

b. The quarterly and annual reports shall contai n the following information, as appropriate. All concentration data shall be presen ted in micrograms per cubic meter.

(1) Sample date;

(2) Site name;

(3) Individual sample data that include every sample scheduled to be collected during the reporting period or the reason why the sample is missing;

(4) Data summaries based on EPA data rules, including, but not limited to, the following:
(a) Particulate mass concentration in microgram per cubic meter in the fine size

range; (b) Particulate mass concentration in microgram per cubic meter in the coarse size

range; (c) Total PM 10 concentration for each measurement;
(d) Precision measurements from the collocated monitor for total PM data collected each quarter;
(e) Average Total PM concentration for the quarter;
(f) Results of laboratory analysis performed for the elemental mass concentrations required pursuant to Condition IX.B.3 above; and
(g) QA/QC data (i.e., precision and accuracy statistics), as applicable

(5) Data recovery statistics

c. In addition, to confirm data validation by th e Permittee, all data reports should include copies of all appropriate supporting documen tation (field data sheets, flow checks, calibrations etc.), including, but not limited to, the following:

(1) Copies of laboratory reports, if applicable;

(2) Copies of all applicable quality control and field reports (e.g., precision checks, flow checks, and calibrations, audit reports); and

(3) Documentation of problems and corr ective actions, and explanations for discrepancies

d. All quarterly and annual reports shall be s ubmitted as follows, both electronically by CD or diskette and in paper copy form:Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 55 1/31/07 (1) The preferred electronic format for the PM sample data is the Department’s Air Assessment Ambient Database (AAAD) format (a template of the format with explanation of the data fields and their contents will be provided by the Department), but comma delimited text or Excel spreadsheet is also acceptable.

(2) The electronic format for the summary data may be in a word processor table or a spreadsheet.

(3) AAAD parameter names and flags shall be used or, the information on flags/ qualifiers and naming shall be provided.

e. All fine, coarse, and total PM 10 data shall be reported in both standard and actual
conditions.

f. Notwithstanding the reporting and data submittal requirements of this section, units shall
be consistent with the most recent EPA st andards (NAAQS) and reporting requirements. If EPA standards or reporting requirements ch ange, the data reporting format and units shall be changed accordingly.

g. All data submitted to the Director shall be reviewed, quality assured, and certified by the
Permittee.

C. Meteorological Monitoring

1. The Permittee shall continue to maintain and operate a meteorological monitoring station to record wind speed, vector wind direction, standard deviation of wind direction, Δ t, and relative humidity. This monitoring shall be in stalled, maintained, and operated in accordance with applicable sections and appendices of the most current version of Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume IV, Meteorological Measurements and consistent with the monitoring protocol originally approved by the Director prior to the installation of the station, a ddressing all general requirements, meteorological station operations, and qua lity assurance initiatives.

2. The meteorological data measurements shall be made continuously. In the event of system malfunction, the unit shall be repaired or replaced within 48 hours. Monitoring shall resume as soon as practicable after the correction of the malfunction problem.

3. The Permittee shall conduct annual audits of the meteorological monitoring station consistent with applicable sections and appendices of the most current version of Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume IV, Meteorological Measurements, utilizing a qualified independent auditor under contract to the Permittee.

4. The Permittee shall provide elec tronic files of the meteorological data in the Department’s Data Collection System (DCS) format to be collected automatically once per day by the Department’s DCS computer via the File Transfer Protocol (ftp).

a. The daily data files produced in any day shall be available at least once per that day, be in a consistent format, and be accessible at times acceptable to the Department.

b. The raw data for upload shall contain the following:

(1) Date and hour of each measurement at each site; and

(2) Hourly average meteorological parameters specified above, in the appropriate measurement units, per the monitoring protocol.

5. Reports

a. A report summarizing the meteorological data measurements collected pursuant to this section shall be submitted before the 90th day of the following quarter. An annual reportFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 56 1/31/07 summarizing the quality assurance data shall be submitted before the 90th day of the quarter following the fourth quarter of the calendar year.

b. The quarterly reports shall contain the following information:

(1) Daily meteorological data in DCS format corrected by the Permittee;

(2) Data recovery averages;

(3) Any field service activities; and

(4) Any other information required in the monitoring protocol.

c. Two paper and two electronic copies of the quart erly and annual reports shall be mailed, one of each to the Air Assessment Section and the other to the Compliance Section of the Air Quality Division of the Department.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page57 1/31/07ATTACHMENT “C”: EQUIPMENT LISTAir Quality Control Permit No. 35426ForPhoenix Cement CompanyTABLE C-1: PROCESS EQUIPMENTProcess Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleRaw MaterialPrimary andSecondaryCrushing andStorageApron Feeder AF-101 1988 Nico FD-4255 906 500 tph XApron Feeder AF-102 1988 Nico FD-4255 905 100 tph XApron Feeder AF-103 2004 Metso AF5-30FS-10.25-15HPNA 700 tph XSurge Bin B-101 1959 NA NA NA 97 tons XBelt Conveyor BC-1011959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 950 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-l0lA1963 Hewitt Robins NA NA 950 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-101B1963 Hewitt Robins NA NA 950 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-l0lC 1988 S&W Steel NA NA 1,000 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-101D 1988 S&W Steel NA NA 1,000 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-1021959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 670 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-102A1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 670 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-102B 1988 S&W Steel NA NA 550 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-103A1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 1200tph XBelt Conveyor BC-103B1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 1200tph XBelt Conveyor BC-103C 1988 S&W Steel NA NA 500 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-103D 1988 S&W Steel NA NA 300 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-103E 2002 NA NA NA 10 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-103F 2002 NA NA NA 10 tph XMill Scale Hopper MSH-001 2005 AEF NA NA 100 tonsApron Feeder AF-104 2004 Metso AF4-24FS-20.83-7.5 hpNA 10 tph XScavenger Screw SCV-104 2004 Metso NA NA NA XBelt Conveyor BC-1041959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 667 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-104A 1988 NA NA NA 1000 tph X DC-201ABelt Conveyor BC-104B 1988 NA NA NA 700 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2141959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 667 tph XPrimary Crusher CR-l01 1958 Allis Chalmers 60x48 A-1 3808 900 tph XSecondary Crusher CR-1021958 Williams580 NA 700 tph XTertiary Crusher CR-103 2003 Atlantic CoastCrushersFSM-1212-BB NA NA X DC-202Wobler Feeder F-101 1958 Universal NA 424X92 NA XVibrating Screen VS-101 1958 Hewitt Robins 72X144 VD-6563 NA XVibrating Screen VS-102 1958 Hewitt Robins 72X92 VD-8182 NA XVibrating Screen VS-103 1958 Hewitt Robins 72X92 VD-8183 NA XRotary Feeder RF-201 1986 Smoot FT-12 NA NA X DC-100Dryer FR-201 1966 NA X DC-202Sample Mill RM-201 1959 C.E. Raymond 3036 H.S. 58105 NA X DC-202Weigh Feeder W-101 1959 Jeffery 5100 29129 50tph XScrew Conveyor SC-101 1986 RJ Ruff NA NA NA XFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page58 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleFly Ash Bin B-201 1986 NA NA NA 187 tons X DC-100Raw MaterialStorage &HandlingBelt Conveyor BC-201 1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 500 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-201A1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 500 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2021959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 500 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2031959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 500 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2051959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 350 tph X DC-205Belt Conveyor BC-209 1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 75 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2101959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 700 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2111959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 290 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2121959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 290 tph X DC-205Belt Conveyor BC-213A 1996 Norfab NA NA 280 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-3011958 Hewitt Robins NA NA 350 tph X DC-304Belt Conveyor BC-2061959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 350 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-2131959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 290 tph XAdditive Hopper HP-ADD 1996 Norfab NA NA NA XReclaimer R-201 1983 R.E. NA NA 500 tph XReclaimer R-202 1983 R.E. NA NA 500 tph XStacker ST-201 1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 500 tph XStacker ST-202 1959 Hewitt Robins NA NA 500 tph XDetachable Trailer TT-201 1959 Hewitt RobinsNA NA 500 tph XDetachable Trailer TT-202 1959 Hewitt RobinsNA NA 500 tph XDetachable Trailer TT-203 1959 Hewitt RobinsNA NA 500 tph XDetachable Trailer TT-204 1959 Hewitt RobinsNA NA 500 tph XRaw GrindingSystem No. 1Air Slide AC-301 1997 Fuller 100 MM NA 22 tph X DC-304Air Slide AC-302 1990 Fuller 350 MM NA 380tph X DC-304Air Slide AC-316 1990 Fuller 480 MM NA 760 tph X DC-301Raw Mix Bin B-301 1959 NA NA NA 278 tons X DC-304Belt Conveyor BC-300 1990 S&W Steel NA NA 360 tph X DC-304Belt Conveyor BC-303 1990 S&W Steel NA NA 215 tph X DC-301Dryer FR-300 1990 Conamara Size 25 NA 24 MM btu/hr X DC-301Dryer FR-301 1959 Hauck NMG180A NA 21.5 MM btu/hr X DC-301Ball Mill BM-301 1959 FLSmidth 12x19 NA NA X DC-301Elevator E-301 1990 Rexnord NA 1636-2612-D 600 tph X DC-301Separator SE-300 1990 Sepax 400-1F NA NA X DC-301Cyclone CY-300 1990 FLSmidth NA NA NA X DC-301Cyclone CY-301 1990 FLSmidth NA NA NA X DC-301FK Pump PN-301 1958 Fuller H-10-8214 Z conv. NA NA X DC-304FK Pump PN-3411972 Fuller 10" Type Z Conv. NANA X DC-304Screw Conveyor SC-301 1984 NA NA NA NA X DC-301Weigh Feeder W-3011984 S&W Steel NA NA 215tph X DC-304Screw Conveyor SC-310 1984 NA NA NA NA X DC-304Swing GrindingSystem No. 2Air Slide AC-304 1959 Fuller 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-305 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-306 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-311 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-313 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-314 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-317 1958 Fuller 480 MM NA 760 tph X DC-302Air Slide AC-321 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-322 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-305Air Slide AC-329 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-305Raw Mix ClinkerBinB-302 1959 NA NA NA 200 Tons X DC-305Belt Conveyor BC-3041958 Hewitt Robins NA NA 100 tph X DC-305Ball Mill BM-302 1959 FLSmidth 12x19 NA NA X DC-302Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page59 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleCyclone CY-302 1958 NA NA NA NA X DC-302Dryer BM302 FR-302 1959 Hauck NMG180ANA 21.5 MM btu/hr X DC-302Bucket Elevator E-302 1958 Jeffery NA NA 420 tph X DC-305FK Pump PN-302 1958 Fuller H2-8-8215 NA NA X DC-305Screw Conveyor SC-303 1959 NA NA NA 210 tph X DC-302Screw Conveyor SC-304 1959 NA NA NA 210 tph X DC-302Screw Conveyor SC-308 1959 NA NA NA NA X DC-302Screw Conveyor SC-311 1959 NA NA NA NA X DC-305Separator SE-303 1958 C.E. Raymond 14-0 D.W. 58089 NA X DC-302Separator SE-304 1958 C.E. Raymond 14-0 D.W. 58090 NA X DC-302Weigh Feeder W-303 1981 Ramsey NA NA 3 tph XFeed Blending Air Slide AC-607 1995 BMH 500 MM NA 760 tph X DC-601Air Slide AC-608 1995 BMH 500 MM NA 760 tph X DC-602Raw Meal Silo S-60l 1959 NA NA NA 1500 tons X DC-601Raw Meal Silo S-602 1959 NA NA NA 1600 tons X DC-601Homogenizing Silo S-605 1959 NA NA NA 2000 tons X DC-602Air Slide AC-609 20012002FBH 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-603FK Pump PN-601 20012002FBH 350-M-00-10428-116NA NA X DC-604AFK Pump PN-602 20012002FBH 350-M-00-10428-116-1NA NA X DC-603Air Slide AC-600 1995 BMH 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-606Air Slide AC-601 1995 BMH 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-606Air Slide AC-601A 1995 BMH 200 MM NA NA X DC-601Air Slide AC-602 1995 BMH 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-605Air Slide AC-602A 1995 BMH 200 MM NA NA X DC-601Air Slide AC-603 1995 BMH 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-605Air Slide AC-604 2001 FBH 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-603Air Slide AC-606 1995 BMH 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-603Bucket Elevator E-600 1995 Rexnord 1636-2812G 23361-1A 595 tph X DC-601Kiln Feed Alleviator AM-407 20012002FBH 90-0830-21320-532 106 NA X DC-409Bin B-407 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 60 tons X DC-410Air Slide AC-408 20012002FBH 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-410Air Slide AC-409 20012002FBH 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-410Air Slide AC-410 20012002FBH 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-410Air Slide AC-413 20012002FBH 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-411Air Slide AC-414 20012002FBH 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-410Air Slide AC-415 20012002FBH 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-410Feeder WS-404 20012002Pfister NA NA NA X DC-410Feeder WS-405 20012002Schenck DLM-26 NA 280 tph X DC-410Raw GrindingSystem No. 3Apron Feeder AF-360 20012002Rexnord R2342-K21 NA 410 tph X DC-431Air Slide AC-360 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-411Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page60 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleAir Slide AC-361 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-411Air Slide AC-362 20012002F.B.H. 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-411Air Slide AC-363 20012002F.B.H. 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-367Air Slide AC-364 20012002F.B.H. 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-368Belt Conveyor BC-360 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 315 tph X DC-366Belt Conveyor BC-361 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 500 tph X DC-366Belt Conveyor BC-363 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 184 tph X DC-366Bucket Elevator E-360 20012002Rexnord 2126-2410F NA 184 tph X DC-366Raw Mill Seal Bin B-360 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 220 Tons X DC-366Cyclone CY-360 20012002FLSmidth L6300 NA NA X DC-431Cyclone CY-361 20012002FLSmidth L6300 NA NA X DC-431Raw Mill RM-306 20012002FLSmidth FRM38/170 NA NA X DC-431Separator SE-360 20012002FLSmidth RAR37.5 NA NA X DC-431Spillage Conveyor BC-362 20012002Rexnord NA NA NA X DC-431FK Pump PN-402 20012002FLSmidth 8-H2Z-00-10428-116-2NA NA X DC-367FK Pump PN-403 20012002FLSmidth 8-H2Z-00-10428-116NA NA X DC-367Screw Conveyor SC-430 20012002FBH 10M320C166 NA NA X DC-431Screw Conveyor SC-431 20012002FBH 10M320C166 NA NA X DC-431Screw Conveyor SC-432 20012002FBH 10M320C166 NA NA X DC-367PyroprocessingSystemEductor FMRS-404 2004 Fox Venturi 4" NA 0.5 tph X DC-431Pre-Heater PH-404 20012002FLSmidth NA NA NA X DC-431Pre-Heater PH-405 20012002FLSmidth NA NA NA X DC-431Pre-Heater PH-406 20012002FLSmidth NA NA NA X DC-431Pre-Heater PH-407 20012002FLSmidth NA NA NA X DC-431Pre-Heater PH-408 20012002FLSmidth NA NA NA X DC-431Calciner CAL-404 20012002FLSmidth ILC Low Nox NA NA X DC-431Kiln K-404 20012002FLSmidth 4400x48000 NA NA X DC-431Clinker Cooler CC-404 20012002FLSmidth SF3X4F NA NA X DC-445Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page61 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleScrew Conveyor SC-461 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 26 tph X DC-445Screw Conveyor SC-462 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 45 tph X DC-445Screw Conveyor SC-463 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 45 tph X DC-445Screw Conveyor SC-465 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 26 TPH X DC-446Screw Conveyor SC-466 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 71 tph X DC-446Screw Conveyor SC-467 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 71 tph X DC-446Clinker Transport Belt Conveyor BC-402 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 300 tph X DC-448Belt Conveyor BC-403 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 300 tph X DC-212Bucket Elevator E-404 20012002Rexnord 1626-1410B NA 190 tph X DC-447Pan Conveyor DBC-404 20012002Rexnord AFT NA 190 TPH X DC-446Clinker Bin B-404 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 1500 tons X DC-447Vibrating Feeder VF-404 20012002Jeffery NF 3605 1006919A 165 tph X DC-447Clinker Storageand TransportBelt Conveyor BC-216 20012002Watkins NA NA 336 tph X DC-213Belt Conveyor BC-217 20012002Watkins NA NA 336 tph X DC-214Belt Conveyor BC-309 20012002Watkins NA NA 336 tph X DC-316Clinker StorageDomeDO-200 20012002Dome Technology NA NA 100,000 tons X DC-213Clinker StorageDomeDO-201 20012002Dome Technology NA NA 25,000 tons X DC-214Belt Conveyor BC-310 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 300 tph X DC-312Coal and CokeHandling andGrindingBelt Conveyor BC-460 1974 Thomas Conveyor NA NA 250 tph X DC-460Belt Conveyor BC-461 1974 Thomas Conveyor NA NA 250 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-462 1974 Thomas Conveyor NA NA 250 tph X DC-450Belt Conveyor BC-463 1974 Thomas Conveyor NA NA 250 tph X DC-460Belt Feeder BC-464 1974 Thomas Conveyor NA NA 32 tph XCrusher CR-460 1974 Pennsylvania Crusher TK-8-32B 4160-02 250 tph X DC-460Vibrating Feeder F-460 1974 Westinghouse V4ALT-PLAN10T-SPLNA 150 tph XVibrating Feeder F-461 1974 Westinghouse V4ALT-PLAN10T-SPLNA 150 tph XScrew Feeder SC-465-0 1974 NA NA NA 32 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-451 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 150 tph X DC-452Belt Conveyor BC-453 20012002Transmission Products NA NA 150 tph X DC-452Coal Bin B-450 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 400 tons X DC-452Pet-Coke Bin B-451 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 175 tons X DC-452Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page62 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleWeigh FeederW-450 20012002Schenck DMO NA 33.9 tph X DC-451Weigh FeederW-451 20012002Schenck DMO NA 33.9 tph X DC-451Belt Conveyor BC-454 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 34 tph X DC-451Separator SE-450 20012002FLSmidth KF-128-A160 481-104-579 NA X X DC-453Coal Mill RM-450 20012002FLSmidth FRM19/26 NA NA X X DC-453Screw Conveyor SC-456 20012002FLSmidth MSDS-A 290 NA NA X DC-453Rail Car Hopper HP-460A 1974 NA NA NA 44.5 XRail Car Hopper HP-460B 1974 NA NA NA 44.5 XCoal Unelevator UE-461 1974 NA NA NA NA XCoal Hopper HP-461 1974 NA NA NA 100 tons XCoke Hopper HP-462 1974 NA NA NA 100 tons XCoal and CokeGrinding & FiringPulverized Fuel Bin B-452 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 20 tons X DC-454Pulverized Fuel Bin B-453 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 20 tons X DC-455Screw Conveyor SC-453 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 48 tph X DC-453Screw Conveyor SC-454 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 48 tph X DC454/455Screw Conveyor SC-455 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 48 tph X DC454/455Feeder PW-452 20012002Pfister DRW 3.10 NA NA X DC-431Feeder PW-451 20012002Pfister DRW 3.10 NA NA X DC-431Mill Feed/ Clinker& GypsumHandlingGypsum Bin B-300 Pre-3/24/98 NA NA NA 100 tons XClinker Bin B-303 1959 NA NA NA 200 tons X DC-306Clinker Bin B-340 1974 NA NA NA 100 tons X DC-342Gypsum Bin B-341 1974 NA NA NA 40 tons X DC-342Belt Conveyor BC-303A 1998 Airbelt 12" NA 5 tph X DC-304Screw Conveyor SC-312 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-306Weigh Feeder W-345 1998 Tecnetics WF10 NA 5 tph XBelt Conveyor BC-312 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 300 tph X DC-312Belt Conveyor BC-313 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 300 tph X DC-306Belt Conveyor BC-350 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 176 tph X DC-352Clinker Bin B-350 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 250 tons X DC-312Gypsum Bin B-351 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA 100 tons X DC-312Scavenger Conveyor SC-350 20012002Schenck NA NA NA X DC-352Scavenger Conveyor SC-35l 20012002Schenck NA NA NA X DC-352Weigh FeederW-350 20012002Schenck DMO NA 161 tph X DC-352Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page63 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleWeigh FeederW-351 20012002Schenck DMO NA 15 tph X DC-352Finish Milling GypsumHopper HP-301 20012002NA NA NA NA XGypsum Feeder F-301 20012002Oldenburg Stamler BF-7Q-0-100 13609 300 tph XFinish MillNo. BM 303Air Slide AC-307 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-303Air Slide AC-308 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-303Air Slide AC-309 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-303Aft Slide AC-312 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-303Air Slide AC-315 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-306Air Slide AC-318 1958 Fuller 480 MM NA 760 tph X DC-306Air Slide AC-323 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-303Air Slide AC-324 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-303Air Slide AC-330 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-303Air Slide AC-331 1959 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-306Belt Conveyor BC-3051958 Hewitt Robins NA NA 100 tph X DC-306Ball Mill BM-303 1959 X DC-303Cyclone CY-303 1958 NA NA NA NA X DC-303Bucket Elevator E-303 1958 Jeffery NA NA 420 tph X DC-306Screw Conveyor SC-305 1959 NA NA NA NA X DC-303Screw Conveyor SC-309 1959 NA NA NA NA X DC-303Screw Conveyor SC-306 1959 NA NA NA 210 tph X DC-303Separator SE-305 1958 C.E. Raymond 14-0 D.W. 58091 210 tph X DC-303Separator SE-306 1958 C.E. Raymond 14-0 D.W. 58092 NA X DC-303Weigh Feeder W-305 1981 Ramsey NA NA 3 tph XFinish MillNo. BM 304Air Slide AC-340 1972 Fuller 350 MM NA 380 tph X DC-341Air Slide AC-341 1972 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-340Air Slide AC-342 1972 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-340Air Slide AC-343 1972 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-340Air Slide AC-344 1972 Fuller 250 MM NA 166 tph X DC-340Air Slide AC-346 1983 Fuller 100 MM NA 22 tph X DC-309Air Slide AC-347 1983 Fuller 100 MM NA 22 tph X DC-308Fly Ash Bin B-342 1983 Brown Tank NA NA 500 tons X DC-309Hydrated Lime Bin B-343 1983 Brown Tank NA NA 105 tons X DC-308Belt Conveyor BC-341 1974 Airbelt NA NA 10 tph X DC-344Belt Conveyor BC-342 1974 Airbelt NA NA 10 tph X DC-344Belt Conveyor BC-343 1997 Cambelt CWR2445-6 NA 21.7 tph X DC-340Ball Mill BM-304 1972 Allis Chalmers 9.5 X 33 NA NA X DC-341Bucket Elevator E-340 1972 Rexnord NA 4120-04 300 tph X DC-341FK Pump PN-340 1972 Fuller 8" Z Conv NA 125 tph X DC-343Screw Conveyor SC-320 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-306DC-341DC-343Screw Conveyor SC-316 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-306Screw Conveyor SC-317 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-306Screw Conveyor SC-340 1974 NA NA NA 204 tph X DC-340Screw Conveyor SC-341 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-340Screw Conveyor SC-342 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-341Separator SE-307 1972 C.E. Raymond 16-0 D.W. NA NA X DC-340Weigh BeltConveyorW-340 1974 Merrick NA NA 50tph X DC-341Weigh BeltConveyorW-341 1974 MerrickNA NA 5 tph X DC-341Weigh Belt W-3421974 NA NA NA NA XFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page64 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleConveyorHopper w/ Scale WS-340 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-309Hopper w/ Scale WS-341 1974 NA NA NA NA X DC-308Clinker GrindingOK MillFK Pump PN-350 1959 Fuller 10" Z Conv NA NA X DC-350FK Pump PN-351 1959 Fuller 10" Z Conv NA NA X DC-350Air Slide AC-350 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-350Air Slide AC-351 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-350Air Slide AC-352 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-350Air Slide AC-353 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-350Air Slide AC-354 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-350Air Slide AC-355 20012002F.B.H. 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-350Surge Bin B-352 20012002Schuff Steel NA NA NA X DC-352Belt Conveyor BC-351 20012002Conveyor Engineering NA NA 241 tph X DC-352Bucket Elevator E-350 20012002Rexnord 1626-1810B NA 240 tph X DC-352Chain Conveyor DCH-350 20012002Rexnord 20" NA 65 tph X DC-350Chain Conveyor DCH-351 20012002Rexnord 20" NA 65 tph X DC-350Dryer FR-350 20012002Conamara NA NA 15 MM btu/hr X DC-350OK Mill RM-305 20012002FLSmidth OK 33-4 NA NA X DC-350Separator SE-308 20012002FLSmidth OKS 70 NA NA X DC-350Bag Packing Air Slide AC-501 1985 Halliburton 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-501Air Slide AC-502 1985 Halliburton 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-505Air Slide AC-505 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-504Air Slide AC-506 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-501Air Slide AC-513 1960 Fuller 300 MM NA 285 tph X DC-505Air Slide AC-514 2005 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-504Air Slide AC-515 2005 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-504Air Slide AC-5l6 1959 Fuller 200 MM NA 118 tph X DC-505Air Slide AC-519 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-507Air Slide AC-5l8 1959 Fuller 200 MM NA 118 tph X DC-507Bin B-501 2005 TWI NA NA NA X DC-501Bin B-502 2005 TWI NA NA NA X DC-505Belt Conveyor BBG-501 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511Belt Conveyor BC-501 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511Bucket Elevator BE-501 1959 Link Belt NA NA NA X DC-501Bucket Elevator BE-502 1959 Link Belt NA NA NA X DC-505Bag Packer BP-503 2005 VentoMatic NA NA NA X DC-511Bag Cutter BS-501 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511FK Pump PN-501 2005 Fuller 10" Z Conv NA NA X DC-504Rotary Screen RSC-501 2005 VentoMatic NA NA NA X DC-511Screw Conveyor SC-501 1982 NA NA NA NA X DC501/505Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page65 1/31/07Process Equipment Type EquipmentID NumberDate of Mfg. Manufacturer Model Num. Serial Num. Max Capacity Applicability ControlDevice40 CFR 63Subpart LLL40 CFR 60Subpart Y40 CFR 60Subpart OOOAZ Article7 RuleScrew Conveyor SC-502 1982 NA NA NA NA X DC501/505Screw Conveyor SC-503 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511Screw Conveyor SC-504 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511Screw Conveyor SC-505 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511Screw Conveyor SC-506 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511Screw Conveyor SC-507 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-511Screw Conveyor SC-508 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC501/505Vibratory Feeder VF-501 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-501Vibratory Feeder VF-502 2005 Vento Matic NA NA NA X DC-505Bulk Loading East Side ScaleLoadoutAC-507 1959 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-503Air Slide AC-508 1985 Halliburton 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-504West Side ScaleLoadoutAC-509 1985 Halliburton 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC-504Air Slide AC-511 1976 Fuller 400 MM NA 475 tph X DC501/505Air Slide AC-5l2 1976 Fuller 200 MM NA 118 tph X DC-504West Side ScaleLoadoutLSP 2003 DCL UN600EV-06VT NA 1282 tph X DC-504East Side ScaleLoadoutLSP 2003 DCL UN600EV-06VT NA 1282 tph X DC-503Silo 15/16 Loadout LSP 1976 Midwesco NA NA 1282 tph X DC-507Cement Storage Screw Conveyor SC-510 20012002NA NA NA NA X DC-510Silo 15 S-15 1976 NA NA NA 753 tons X DC-512Silo 16 S-16 1976 NA NA NA 753 tons X DC-512South Finish Silo 1 S-1 1959 NA NA NA 2764 tons X DC-508South Finish Silo 2 S-2 1959 NA NA NA 3257 tons X DC-508South Finish Silo 6 S-6 1959 NA NA NA 3156 tons X DC-508South Finish Silo 7 S-7 1959 NA NA NA 3244 tons X DC-508South Finish Silo 11 S-11 1959 NA NA NA 881 tons X DC-508South Finish Silo 12 S-12 1959 NA NA NA 881 tons X DC-508Cement Silo 3 S-3 1959 NA NA NA 3136 tons X DC-510Cement Silo 4 S-4 1959 NA NA NA 3029 tons X DC-510Cement Silo 5 S-5 1959 NA NA NA 2922 tons X DC-510Cement Silo 8 S-8 1959 NA NA NA 3136 tons X DC-510Cement Silo 9 S-9 1959 NA NA NA 3012 tons X DC-510Cement Silo 10 S-10 1959 NA NA NA 2922 tons X DC-510Cement Silo 13 S-13 1959 NA NA NA 834 tons X DC-510Cement Silo 14 S-14 1959 NA NA NA 650 tons X DC-510Cooling Towers Mill Cooling Tower CTWR-300 1959 Marley NA NA NA XRM-305 CoolingTowerCTWR-302 20012002Marley AV-61002, G-235 NA NA XKiln - Raw MillCooling TowerCTWR-400 20012002Marley AV-61002, G-235 NA NA XNA = Not Applicable or Not AvailableFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page66 1/31/07TABLE C-2: CONTROL DEVICEControl Device Date of Installation Manufacture Rated Flow (cfm)DC-100 1986 Dusty Dustless 1000DC-201A 2006 FLS Airtech 4000DC-202 1985 Ultra Industry 5000DC-205 1959 Norblo 5832DC-212 2002 Sly 2000DC-213 2002 Sly 4000DC-214 2002 Sly 4000DC-301 1984 Fabric Filters NW 60000DC-302 1959 Norblo 32700DC-303 1959 Norblo 32700DC-304 1959 Norblo 12000DC-305 1959 Norblo 12000DC-306 1959 Norblo 12000DC-308 1983 Ultra Ind. 2500DC-309 1983 FlexKleen 2400DC-312 2002 FBH 6050DC-316 2002 FBH 3100DC-340 1972 Mikropul 20000DC-341 1972 Mikropul 10000DC-342 1972 Mikropul 5000DC-343 1998 Mikropul 1500DC-344 1972 Mikropul 5000DC-350 2002 FBH 228000DC-352 2002 FBH 10000DC-366 2002 FBH 8400DC-367 2002 FBH 1850DC-368 2002 FBH 1600DC-409 2002 FBH 11350DC-410 2002 FBH 2950DC-411 2002 FBH 1300DC-431 2002 FBH 259200DC-445 2002 FBH 138000DC-446 2002 FBH 2900DC-447 2002 FBH 7150Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page67 1/31/07DC-448 2002 FBH 3100DC-450 2002 FBH 3000DC-451 2002 FBH 3720DC-452 2002 FBH 5360DC-453 2002 FBH 38800DC-454 2002 FBH 30DC-455 2002 FBH 30DC-460 1974 FBH 6000DC-501 2003 BHA 8210DC-503 1959 Mikropul 3000DC-504 1959 Pangborn 6000DC-505 2004 BHA 8210DC-507 1980 Mikropul 755DC-508 1986 Ecolaire 5000DC-510 2002 FBH 13300DC-511 2005 Scientific 13000DC-512 2005 FLS Airtech 8000DC-601 1972 Mikropul 7200DC-602 1988 Mikropul 7500DC-603 1996 Fuller Kovako 2500DC-604A 1998 Wheelabrator 1500DC-605 1996 Fuller Kovako 2500DC-606 1996 Wheelabrator 500Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 68 1/31/07 

## ATTACHMENT “D”: DUST CONTROL PLAN

Air Quality Control Permit No. 35426

For Phoenix Cement Company

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Requirements and Policy

Arizona Administrative Code Title 18, Chapter 2, (AAC R18-2) Article 6 requires that an operator take reasonable precautions to prevent excess amounts of particulate matter (PM) from becoming airborne from sources of fugitive dust, including open areas, roadways and streets, material handling, and storage piles. Under AAC R18-2-6 10, opacity from any nonpoint source shall not be greater than 40 percent, measured in accordan ce with the Arizona Testing Manual, Reference
Method 9.

Phoenix Cement Company’s (PCC’s) dust cont rol goals include ongoing road-paving activities, watering or otherwise treating unpaved roads and parking areas, taking other reasonable precautions to prevent excess amounts of PM from b ecoming airborne, and to maintain compliance with the 40 percent opacity standard. PCC w ill accomplish these goals with diligent use of practical methods, equipment, and procedures curre ntly utilized at the Clarkdale facility. PCC is committed to operating as an environmentally resp onsible producer of quality cement products.

B. Background

The PCC Clarkdale facility includes a cement ma nufacturing plant and an adjacent quarry. The cement plant utilizes rotary kilns fired by coal/coke, coal, and natural gas to produce cement from various types of materials, including limestone, volcanic ash, and mill scale.

Limestone and other types of rock are blasted and transported by haul trucks from the quarry to the primary crusher or td stockpiles. Crushed rock is routed to surge piles fur subsequent transfer to the secondary crusher. The secondary crusher is us ed in conjunction with feeders and screens to
further reduce the size of the rock th at is sent to raw mill storage bays.

The crushed rock is conveyed from the storage bays to the raw mill for grinding via the rock bin, elevator and separator. Milled material (raw meal) is transported to the blending system, and then it is transported into feed bins from which the meal is discharged to the pyroprocessing system.

The heart of the Portland cement manufacturi ng process is the pyroprocessing system, namely, Kiln 4. This system transforms the raw mix into clinkers, which are gray, glass-hard, spherically shaped nodules. Emission sources in the clinker ha ndling and storage facility are eliminated by the use of indoor clinker storage enclosures (domes).

During normal operations, PCC utilizes water trucks regularly on haul roads and other unpaved roads to prevent excessive airborne dust generati on. Water trucks operate on a regular basis
whenever roads are in use.

II. CONTROL PLAN

A. Roads

Various types of dust control measures may be utilized by PCC to minimize fugitive emissions from unpaved roads. Haul roads between the quarry and the primary crusher are regularly watered on all days on which haul trucks operate. Other unpaved roads on the facility are regularly wateredFinal PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 69 1/31/07 and/or treated with dust suppressants and/or chemical stabilizers as necessary to minimize dust from vehicular traffic and high winds.

This Dust Control Plan requires PCC to ensure that water trucks operate on each day on which haul
trucks and/or other vehicular tra ffic occurs. If water trucks are not operated on a particular day, PCC shall record the date and the reason for non-operation.

B. Open Areas

Open areas, such as unpaved parking areas and othe r level areas, are regularly watered and/or treated with dust suppressants and/or chemical stabilizers as necessary to minimize dust from vehicular traffic and high winds. PCC shall ensure that water trucks operate on each day on which vehicular traffic occurs in unpaved open areas. If wa ter trucks are not operated on a particular day, PCC shall record the date and the reason for non-operation.

C. Storage Piles

PCC has eliminated outdoor clinker storage and handling with the construction of two domed enclosures. A significant reduction in airborne f ugitive dust was achieved by construction of the domes. Only raw feed is stored in outdoor storag e piles. PCC adds dust suppressants and/or water to the raw feed during the primary and secondary crushing processes. As a result, the raw feed piles contain high-moisture, treated material which does not become airborne in excessive

amounts.

PCC shall ensure that raw feed stored in outdoor storage piles has sufficient moisture content, or has been otherwise sufficiently treated with dust suppressants, to prevent excessive airborne dust generation. If excessive airborne dust is observe d, PCC shall record the date and determine the reason(s) for the event.

D. Other Control Techniques

PCC is continually evaluating and, when practical, implementing a program to pave plant roads. In addition, PCC continues to evaluate binders, dust suppressants, and construction techniques that provide a safe, economical and environmentally responsible means of managing fugitive dust.

III. MONITORING

PCC shall conduct a visual survey on a daily basis to ensure that excessive amounts of fugitive dust are not becoming airborne. If excessive dust is observe d, PCC shall record the date and the reasons.Final PCC Permit No. 35426 Page 70 1/31/07 

## ATTACHMENT “E”: OPERATIO N AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

Air Quality Control Permit No. 35426

For Phoenix Cement Company