alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| ·   | an      annual cash retainer of $25,000 per year, plus an additional $75,000 for      the Non-Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors (“Board”), Mr.      Morrison; |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | additional      cash retainer of $6,000 per year for each member of the Audit Committee,      plus an additional $5,000 per year for the chairperson of the Audit      Committee; |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | additional      cash retainer of $4,000 per year for each member of the Compensation      Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee and the Special      Litigation Committee, plus an additional $1,000 per year for the      chairpersons of such committees; |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | Board      meeting attendance fees of $1,500 (in-person) and $500 (telephonic) and      committee meeting attendance fees of $1,000 (in-person) and $500      (telephonic); and |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | optional      Blackberry wireless device valued at approximately  $1,800. |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Robert Clay KIME, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-688.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 21, 1972.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Vaughn Rud-nick, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7391 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove certain geographic 

and originating site restrictions on the furnishing of telehealth services 

under the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2020 

Ms. SHERRILL (for herself, Mr. KEVIN HERN of Oklahoma, and Mr. SCHRADER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove 

certain geographic and originating site restrictions on 

the furnishing of telehealth services under the Medicare 

program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Telehealth Ac5 cess Act of 2020’’. 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7391 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING CERTAIN GEOGRAPHIC AND ORIGI2 NATING SITE RESTRICTIONS ON THE FUR3 NISHING OF TELEHEALTH SERVICES UNDER 

4 THE MEDICARE PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(m)(4)(C) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(4)(C)) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘and only if’’ and 

9 all that follows through the period at the end and 

10 inserting a period; and 

11 (2) in clause (ii)(X), by striking ‘‘, but only 

12 for’’ and all that follows through the period at the 

13 end and inserting a period. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 1834(m) 

15 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)), as 

16 amended by subsection (a), is further amended— 

17 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘paragraph 

18 (8)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (6)’’; 

19 (2) in paragraph (2)— 

20 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

21 ‘‘paragraph (8)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

22 (6)’’; and 

23 (B) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking 

24 ‘‘paragraph (6)(C)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

25 (5)(B)’’; 

26 (3) in paragraph (4)— 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7391 IH

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

2 ‘‘paragraph (8)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

3 (6)’’; 

4 (B) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking 

5 ‘‘paragraphs (5), (6), and (7)’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘paragraph (5)’’; and 

7 (C) in subparagraph (F)(i), by striking 

8 ‘‘paragraph (8)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph 

9 (6)’’; 

10 (4) by striking paragraph (5); 

11 (5) in paragraph (6)— 

12 (A) by redesignating such paragraph as 

13 paragraph (5); 

14 (B) by striking subparagraph (A); 

15 (C) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) 

16 and (C) as subparagraphs (A) and (B), respec17 tively; and 

18 (D) in subparagraph (A), as so redesig19 nated, by striking ‘‘described in subparagraph 

20 (A)’’ and inserting ‘‘furnished on or after Janu21 ary 1, 2019, for purposes of diagnosis, evalua22 tion, or treatment of symptoms of an acute 

23 stroke, as determined by the Secretary’’; 

24 (6) by striking paragraph (7); and 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 7391 IH

1 (7) by redesignating paragraph (8) as para2 graph (6). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
#### Salvatore Charles GRECH, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40995.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 29, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 243 So.2d 216.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT CO. OF ORLANDO, INC., Petitioner, v. FACTORY INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

No. 40479.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 18, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 209.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10(v)

                                                                       conformed

                   AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



      This Amendment Number 1 to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") amends
that certain Employment Agreement by and between Oxford Health Plans, Inc. (the
"Company") and Norman C. Payson, M.D. ("Executive"), effective as of February
23, 1998 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement.

      The Company and the Executive, pursuant to, and in accordance with,
Section 13 of the Agreement, hereby agree to amend the Agreement by replacing
the second sentence of Section 4(b)(i) in its entirety with the following
sentence:

      "As promptly as practicable, and in any event no later than April 15,
      1999, the Company shall, at its expense, cause all shares subject to the
      Option to be registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
      "Securities Act"), and registered or qualified under applicable state
      laws, to be freely resold."

      This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the
different parties hereto on separate counterparts, each of which when so
executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of which constitute one and
the same instrument.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment this
9th day of December, 1998.


                                          OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC.



                                          By: /s/ JEFFERY H. BOYD
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Jeffery H. Boyd, Executive Vice
                                              President and General Counsel


                                              /s/ NORMAN C. PAYSON, M.D.
                                              --------------------------------
                                              Norman C. Payson, M.D.
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT 23(b)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Oxford Health Plans, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-49738, 33-70908, 333-988, 333-28109, 333-35693 and 33-94242) on Form S-8 of
Oxford Health Plans, Inc. of our report dated February 23, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Oxford Health Plans, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive earnings (loss), and cash flows
for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1997, and the
related consolidated financial statement schedules, which reports appear in the
December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Oxford Health Plans, Inc.

                                                                    KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 19, 1999


                                       91
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          46,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,361,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                   186,799
<INVENTORY>                                  5,232,393
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,951,981
<PP&E>                                       5,227,596
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,984,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,249,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,108,753
<BONDS>                                      1,854,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,098
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,273,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,249,736
<SALES>                                      2,823,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,823,077
<CGS>                                        1,799,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,799,601
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,463
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (383,378)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (128,539)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (254,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (254,839)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of the Secretary 

July 18, 2013 

Commenter Castle 

State of Iowa 

Re: In the Matter of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., File No. 082 3199, Docket No. C-4407 

 In the Matter of DrJays.com, Inc., File No. 122 3063, Docket No. C-4408 

 In the Matter of Eminent, d/b/a Revolve Clothing, File No. 122 3065, Docket No. C-4409 

 Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent agreements 

in the above-referenced proceedings. The Commission has placed your comment on the public 

record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii), 

and has given it serious consideration. 

Your comment raised concern that the agreements may not impose “meaningful 

consequences” on the respondents. After consideration of your comment, the Commission has 

determined that the relief set forth in the consent agreements is appropriate and sufficient to remedy 

the violations alleged in the complaints. The orders prohibit the respondents from web, mail, and 

catalog advertisements that violate the Fur Act and Rules. Under federal law, a violation of an FTC 

order is punishable by a civil penalty of up to $16,000 per violation. Therefore, if the respondents’ 

websites falsely advertise fur products as “faux” in the future, the respondents may be liable for 

significant civil penalties. Moreover, respondents have offered refunds to all consumers who 

purchased the falsely advertised products. 

Accordingly, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served by 

issuing the Decision and Order in each of these matters in final form without modification. The final 

Decisions and Orders and other relevant materials are available from the Commission’s website at 

http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, 

and we thank you again for your comment. 

By direction of the Commission. 

 Donald S. Clark 

 Secretary
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Date: April 28, 2015

On April 22, 2015, Erika Sasser, Kimber Scavo, and Martha Keating of EPA’s Health and 

Environmental Impacts Division, attended a meeting with representatives of the American 

Chemistry Council. The meeting was held at the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 

Research Triangle Park, NC. Attendees discussed timing of the final ozone National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards and the procedure for submitting late comments. The status of the 

NAAQS reviews for other pollutants was also discussed. There were no meeting materials.

The following is a list of attendees from the American Chemistry Council. 

Name Company

Bruce Davis DuPont

Jarod Davis Dow

Lorraine Gershman American Chemistry Council

Steve Gossett Eastman

Patty Hemmelgarn Ashland

Shari Keller Shell

Scott Munk Bayer CropScience

Derek Reese ExxonMobil

Ro Sharma LyondellBasell

Steve Smith LyondellBasell

Rick Vickery Chemours

Gindi Vincent ExxonMobil

Russell Wozniak Dow

Via phone

Fred Fedri OxyChem

Anu Kunapuli Merck

Carrie Phillips CPChem

Teresa Reksel Evonik
EXHIBIT 23.2

                            CONSENT OF KPMG LLP


The Board of Directors
Lunar Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (File No. 33-63891) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-40469) of Lunar Corporation
of our reports dated July 24, 1998 relating to the consolidated balance sheet
of Lunar Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows and the
related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the two-year
period ended June 30, 1998, which reports appear in the June 30, 1999 annual
report on Form 10-K of Lunar Corporation.


KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
September 23, 1999
#### EVERGLADES BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FLAMINGO DRIFT FISHING, INC., Respondent.

No. 40510.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 27, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

 

 June 17, 2016 

David P. Wales

Jones Day 

51 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001-2113 

Mark W. Nelson 

Cleary Gottlieb

2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

Re: HeidelbergCement AG and Italcementi S.p.A.

File No. 151-0200; Docket No. C-4577 

Dear Mr. Wales and Mr. Nelson: 

 Pursuant to Paragraph IV.A, of the Decision and Order and Paragraph III.A. of the Order 

to Maintain Assets in this matter, the Commission has determined to approve William Hill as the 

Monitor under the Decision and Order and the Order to Maintain Assets, and to approve the 

Monitor Agreement attached as Appendix II to the Decision and Order. 

 By direction of the Commission. 

 Donald S. Clark 

 Secretary

cc: William Hill
#### Donald L. TUCKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; M. Daniel Futch, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- EX-10.7




 Exhibit 10.7         

November 3, 2008 

RAJKUMAR JALAN 

prjalan@yahoo.com 
 DELIVERED BY HAND OR EMAIL 

Dear Raj: 
 I am pleased to confirm the offer
for you to join Al 0 Networks, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), as its CTO at our San Jose headquarters. This is a full-time permanent position. You will be reporting to Lee Chen, the Company’s President and CEO. 

Your starting salary will be at a rate of $150,000 per year, payable in accordance with the company’s payroll schedule. 

You will also be granted options or the opportunity to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, subject to the terms and
conditions of the Company’s 2008 Stock Plan. Generally speaking, those terms will include, in your case, among other things, vesting as to 1/4 of the shares after 1 year of employment, and an additional 1/48th of the shares at the end of each
additional month thereafter. 
 You will be entitled to receive the Company’s employee benefits made available to other employees at
your level to the full extent of your eligibility, once such benefits are established. 
 Your employment will be subject to your execution
of the Company’s standard form of Employee Agreement (relating to non-disclosure of confidential information and assignment of inventions to the Company), a copy of which is available upon request. 

If this offer meets your approval, please confirm your acceptance by signing a copy of this letter below and confirming your first date of
employment. This offer is valid for five (5) business days following your receipt of this letter; and assumes a proposed start date not later than November 16, 2008. The terms and conditions of this offer letter supersede any prior written
or oral communications to you concerning employment at the Company. 









 RAJKUMAR JALAN 

November 3, 2008 
  Page
 2
 
  

 I look forward to a favorable reply and to welcoming you to A10 Networks, Inc. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Lee Chen

	Lee Chen
	President and CEO


  

			
	Acknowledged and accepted:
	
	 /s/ Rajkumar Jalan

	RAJKUMAR JALAN


			
		
	Date:	 	 11-16-2008



			
		
	Start Date:	 	 11-16-2008
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Melvin FRANK v. Judge Frank SHEA et al.

No. 60612.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 13, 1977.

In re: Melvin Frank, applying for writ of mandamus. (Parish of Orleans).

*1042Writ granted. It is ordered that the relator be returned from the penitentiary to the Orleans Parish Prison until his appeal is disposed of.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman 

Julie Brill 

Maureen K. Ohlhausen 

Joshua D. Wright 

In the Matter of

MCWANE, INC., 

 a corporation, and 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

 a limited partnership. 

 Docket No. 9351

 

 ORDER EXTENDING TIMETABLE 

 FOR ISSUING FINAL DECISION AND ORDER 

 

In order to ensure that it can give full consideration to the many issues presented 

by the cross-appeals in this matter, the Commission has determined, pursuant to Commission 

Rule 4.3(b), 16 C.F.R. § 4.3(b), to extend until January 24, 2014 the timetable for issuing a final 

decision and order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

By the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark 

Secretary 

ISSUED: November 21, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 96-ANE-37; Amendment 39-9874; AD 97-01-03]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive 
(AD) 97-01-03 applicable to certain Textron Lycoming reciprocating 
engines that was published in the Federal Register on January 3, 1997 
(62 FR 307). Paragraph (g) in the compliance section was misdesignated 
as paragraph(f). This document redesignates that paragraph. In all 
other respects, the original document remains the same.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Franco Pieri and Pat Perrotta, 
Aerospace Engineer, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Engine 
and Propeller Directorate, 10 Fifth St., Valley Stream, NY 11581; 
telephone (516) 256-7526 and (516) 256-7534, fax (516) 568-2716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final rule airworthiness directive 
applicable to certain Textron Lycoming reciprocating engines, was 
published in the Federal Register on January 3, 1997 (62 FR 307). The 
following correction is needed:


Sec. 39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 309, in the first column, in the Compliance Section, the 
second paragraph ``(f)'' is redesignated to read paragraph ``(g)''.

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on February 5, 1997.
James C. Jones,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-4143 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
ORIGINAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERA TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Wiliam E. Kovacic, Chairman

Pamela Jones Harbour

Jon Leibowitz

J. Thomas Rosch

A corporation.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

Public

In the Matter of

Polypore International, Inc.,

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR THE MOORE COMPANY TO MOVE

TO LIMIT SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

WHEREAS, on November 6, 2008, Respondent Polypore International, Inc.

("Polypore") served a Subpoena Duces Tecum (the "Subpoena") on The Moore Company

pursuant to Rule 3.34(b) of the Federal Trade Commission's ("FTC's") Rules of Practice For

Adjudicative Proceedings, 16 C.F.R. § 3.34(b) (the "Rules of Practice");

WHEREAS, counsel for the Paries have engaged in multiple conversations in an

attempt to reach an agreement as to the scope of the Subpoena;

WHEREAS, counsel for The Moore Company is preparing a motion to limit the scope of

the Subpoena;

WHEREAS, the Parties are in the midst of discussions that may affect the relief sought

by The Moore Company in its motion to limit the scope of the Subpoena;

WHEREAS, counsel for Polypore has agreed to extend The Moore Company's deadline

for moving to limit the scope of the Subpoena until Monday, December 15,2008.

#769661vl
WHEREFORE, IT is HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that The Moore

Company shall have until Monday, December 15,2008 to move to limit the Subpoena Duces

Tecum served on The Moore Company on November 6,2008.

Respectfully submitted,

THE MOORE COMPANY

By its attorneys,

(

Michael J. Connolly \

Laura B. Angelini

HINCKLEY, ALLEN & SNYDER LLP

28 State Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02109- 1 775

(617) 345-9000

AS TO THE EXTENSION ONLY:

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By its attorneys,

-~ ~. ~'" - -v\.

~

Eric D . Welsh

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Three Wachovia Center, Suite 3000

401 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202-1935

(704) 372-9000

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 10, 2008, I caused a copy of this document to be

served upon the following persons via first class mail, postage pre-paid:

Eric D. Welsh, Esq.

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Three Wachovia Center, Suite 3000

#766410vl 2
401 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202-1935

(704) 372-9000

J. Robert Robertson, Esq.

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20580

Steven Dah, Esq.

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20580

#76641Ovl

\.

C) ., --r

3