alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-K AT MAY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             779,216
<SECURITIES>                                     4,969,512
<RECEIVABLES>                                       48,244
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,500
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,913,574
<PP&E>                                             222,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                      46,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,093,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              404,088
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            59,362
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,630,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,093,951
<SALES>                                          1,792,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,792,948
<CGS>                                              820,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,573,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (474,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (474,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (474,120)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.08)

        

</TABLE>
#### William T. WELLS and Travelers Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Tina LETIS, a minor, by her father and next friend, George Letis, and George Letis, individually, Appellees.

No. 71-1009.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 15, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Cubic Corporation

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of CubicCorporation as of June 30, 2004, and the related condensed consolidatedstatements of income and cash flows for the three- and nine-month periods endedJune 30, 2004 and 2003.  Thesefinancial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally ofapplying analytical procedures to financial data, and making inquiries ofpersons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than anaudit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of anopinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such anopinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modificationsthat should be made to the condensed consolidated interim financial statementsreferred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally acceptedaccounting principles.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the auditing standardsof the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), theconsolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2003and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in ourreport dated November 19, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion onthose consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanyingconsolidated condensed balance sheet at September 30, 2003, is fairlystated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheetfrom which it has been derived.

 
|                  | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                  |
|                  |
| San Diego, California |
| July 21, 2004    |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 6, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60273

Summary Calendar

RONNIE ADRIAN WILSON,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------------------------------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A34 607 336

---------------------------------------------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ronnie Adrian Wilson, a native and citizen of Trinidad, petitions for review of the order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings on

the basis of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289 (2001), and of amended immigration regulations providing
-2-

for the filing of “special” motions to reopen pursuant to the rationale of St. Cyr. See 8 C.F.R. §

1003.44. 

We review the denial of a motion to reopen under a “‘highly deferential abuse-of-discretion

standard.’” Altimirano-Lopez v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 547, 549 (5th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted).

Motions to reopen removal proceedings are “‘disfavored,’” and “the moving party bears a ‘heavy

burden.’” Id. (citation omitted). We review the BIA’s conclusions of law de novo, but “defer to the

BIA’s interpretations of immigration regulations if that interpretation is reasonable.” HernandezCastillo v. Moore, 436 F.3d 516, 519 (5th Cir. 2006), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 28, 2006) (No.

05-1251).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Wilson’s “special” motion to reopen. First,

Wilsonwas prohibited by the very regulation on which he reliesfromfiling a second motion to reopen

based on St. Cyr. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.44(g)(3). In any event, Wilson’s St. Cyr claim was meritless.

The “aggravated felony” forgery offense to which Wilson pleaded guilty on May 31, 1996, did not

qualify as an “aggravated felony” under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1101(a)(43)(R) at the time he entered the plea. However, Congress explicitly included Wilson’s

offense as an aggravated felony as part of an explicitly retroactive redefinition of his offense, in § 321

ofthe IllegalImmigrationReformand Immigrant ResponsibilityAct of 1996, which became effective

on April 1, 1997. See St. Cyr, 533 U.S. at 319. 

Wilson’s petition for review is DENIED.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

CASE NAME 

ECM BioFilms, Inc. et al. 

FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

009358 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in 

proceeding the appearance of 

D counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) 

D counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

~ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding, 

Rieder Geoffrey (Attorney) 

geoff@f~ aw.com 

Foster, Rieder & Jackson, P.C. 

201 Third Street, NW 

Suite 1500 

Albuquerque, NM 87102 

Phone Number: 505-767-0577 

Fax Number: 505-242-9944 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 

(Geoffrey D. Rieder) 

2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being fi led. 

John Lake (President) 

johnlake@goecopure.com 

Bia-Tee Environmental, LLC 

7009 Prospect Ave, NE 

Suite 202' 

Albuquerque, NM 87110 

Phone Number: 505-999-1160 

5. DATE SIGNED 

2/24/2014 

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W . 

Washington, D.C. 20580
**EXHIBIT 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8Nos. 33-94546, 333-07195, 33-94544, 333-07199, 333-52589, 333-62781, 333-52593, 333-77883, 333-87882 and 333-87880) pertaining to the Sypris Solutions, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and to the Sypris Solutions, Inc. IndependentDirectors’ Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-114982) pertaining to the Sypris Solutions, Inc. 2004 Equity Plan, of our reports dated February 14, 2007 (except Note 9, as towhich the date is March 12, 2007), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of Sypris Solutions, Inc., Sypris Solutions, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sypris Solutions, Inc., included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Louisville, Kentucky 

March 12, 2007
March 13, 2015 

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket 

Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: Supporting information for Lewanui UAS exemption 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In light of the new proposed regulations that are currently under review, I'd like to add 

some information to support my request for exemption. I would like to specify that I am 

not just a UAS / model aircraft enthusiast. I am a United States Navy Veteran and I 

currently hold an Airline Transportation Pilot Certificate for Rotorcraft-Helicopters and 

have over ten years' experience operating in the National Airspace System and I'm 

employed as a full time pilot. I have extensive film experience with multiple agencies; 

HBO, National Geographic, Motor Trend, Honda, Lexus / Toyota, just to name a few. 

In addition to flying manned aircraft, I possess over 20 years flying remote control and 

model aircraft. My experience extends well beyond UAS to radio control helicopters 

and fixed wing (scale, 3D aerobatic, slope soaring). 

If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact the 

undersigned at 808.557.1988 or tjlerma@gmail.com . 

Sincerely yours, 

~ 

Timothy Lerma 

Lewa n u i 

1629 Mona Loop, Hilo, HI 96720 T: 808.557.1988 E: tjlerma@gmail.com
#### T. W. GANUS v. Russell L. CUOCO and Board of Levee Commissioners of the Orleans Levee District.

No. 61186.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Russell L. Cuoco applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 351 So.2d 224.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS and CALOGERO, JJ., are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
ConsumerState,CountyorAreaCode,Complaints
Alabama,205,"5,846"
Alabama,251,"3,243"
Alabama,256,"4,372"
Alabama,334,"3,270"
Alabama,659,25
Alabama,938,20
Alabama,Autauga,202
Alabama,Baldwin,"2,550"
Alabama,Barbour,94
Alabama,Bibb,41
Alabama,Blount,133
Alabama,Bullock,3
Alabama,Butler,19
Alabama,Calhoun,"1,116"
Alabama,Chambers,60
Alabama,Cherokee,109
Alabama,Chilton,166
Alabama,Choctaw,17
Alabama,Clarke,29
Alabama,Clay,37
Alabama,Cleburne,25
Alabama,Coffee,179
Alabama,Colbert,222
Alabama,Conecuh,55
Alabama,Coosa,18
Alabama,Covington,187
Alabama,Crenshaw,38
Alabama,Cullman,454
Alabama,Dale,211
Alabama,Dallas,68
Alabama,DeKalb,354
Alabama,Elmore,854
Alabama,Escambia,188
Alabama,Etowah,452
Alabama,Fayette,162
Alabama,Franklin,571
Alabama,Geneva,67
Alabama,Greene,9
Alabama,Hale,21
Alabama,Henry,41
Alabama,Houston,522
Alabama,Jackson,112
Alabama,Jefferson,"4,602"
Alabama,Lamar,118
Alabama,Lauderdale,448
Alabama,Lawrence,38
Alabama,Lee,614
Alabama,Limestone,524
Alabama,Lowndes,6
Alabama,Macon,102
Alabama,Madison,"3,727"
Alabama,Marengo,88
Alabama,Marion,782
Alabama,Marshall,435
Alabama,Mobile,"1,641"
Alabama,Monroe,10
Alabama,Montgomery,"1,198"
Alabama,Morgan,631
Alabama,No Zip Code Reported,130
Alabama,Perry,9
Alabama,Pickens,19
Alabama,Pike,50
Alabama,Randolph,51
Alabama,Russell,166
Alabama,Shelby,"1,878"
Alabama,St. Clair,302
Alabama,Sumter,18
Alabama,Talladega,274
Alabama,Tallapoosa,81
Alabama,Tuscaloosa,741
Alabama,Walker,457
Alabama,Washington,23
Alabama,Wilcox,16
Alabama,Winston,232
Exhibit 10.52 2013 10K






EXHIBIT 10.52


TERMS OF DEFERRED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT WITH CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The form of Deferred Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, contains blanks where the executive's name, target number of shares, grant date, vesting date, performance period, shortened performance period start date, and months in term provided under the Agreement vary for each executive.  


On March 3, 2014, performance share awards were granted providing certain executives the opportunity to earn common stock, the number of which is determined pursuant to, and subject to the attainment of, performance goals.  The performance share awards were granted with a term of 34.5 months and vest on January 21, 2017.  The performance period start date was January 1, 2014 thereby making the performance period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2016.  The target number of shares for each executive awarded performance shares on March 3, 2014 is listed below.




	
		
	Executive Officer
	Target number of shares

	Joseph J. MarcAurele
	4,300

	David V. Devault
	2,200

	Edward O. Handy, III
	2,200

	Stephen M. Bessette
	1,400

	James M. Hagerty
	1,400

	Mark K.W. Gim
	1,400

	Barbara J. Perino
	1,100

	Kristen L. DiSanto
	1,100
#### Fred Russell GRONEAU, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-603.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 16, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

50) ll-E-10 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04 AM Sheet SO of 264 
P.2 

$"t-l<> 

CONTACT REPORT FORM 

PES PROJECT NO. N204 

Date Company 

08/27/93 LASCO (VA) 

08/27/93 " 

09-07-93 " 

09-07-93 LASCO (CA) 

Description 

Contact 

Dwight Jones 

Mike Weicher 

Mike Quinn 

Sid Pe 

Phone 

(800) 444-0832 

(800) 877-0464 

Discussions concerning LASCO's REECO thermal incineration device in 

its composite tub/shower production facility in South Boston, Virginia. 

(Mr. Jones is plant superintendent, Messrs. Uelcher and Quinn are in 

maintenance, and Mr. Pe is in engineering.) The REECO system controls 

styrene emissions from two spray booths: one gel coating booth and one 

larger booth in which the first and second laminating steps are performed 

back-to-back. The system was installed in December 1986, and processes 

about 18,000 acfm. Mr. Quinn said that while there were problems with the 

system initially, it has performed very well over the past few years. 

The State of Virginia paid the cost to have the system installed. 

The cost of the REECO unit was about $750,000, while the total installed 

cost was $1,125 million. Operating costs include natural gas, which 

ranges from 0.51 million Btu/hr (idle mode) to 0.65 million Btu/hr (normal 

mode) to 3 million Btu/hr (startup). Electrical consumption is 155 

horsepower. Overall operating costs were estimated by Mr. Pe at $9-10,000 

per month, or about $110,000 per year. 

REECO has performed efficiency testing on the system, and Mr. Pe 

characterized the control efficiency as 95 percent (about 90-110 lb/hr of 

styrene is controlled). The system has 90 percent thermal efficiency. 

LASCO also has incineration devices in its facilities in 

Pennsylvania and Texas. However, Mr. Pe said that the systems are not 

cost-effective and LASCO would like to take the Virginia system out of the 

process (and then use the same rationale to convince Pennsylvania and 

Texas that the company should remove its other two systems). 

If a visit to the South Boston facility is desired, Mr. Scott 

Hartland, Plant Manager, should be contacted at (800) 444-0832.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00172-CV

In the Interest of J.A.G.M. and 

A.M.M.

§

§

§

§

From the 393rd District Court

of Denton County (2012-60551-393)

November 1, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
J

- A34011

- 15

NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

- SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

MAWUYRAYRASSUNA EMMANUEL YAOGAN NOVIHO

Appellant No. 394 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 27 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 36

- CR

- 0004200

- 2013

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OTT, J., and JENKINS, J.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED FEBRUARY 17, 2016

Appellant, Mawuyrayrassuna Emmanuel Yaogan Noviho, appeals from

the judgment of sentence entered by the Honorable David L. Ashworth,

Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County. We a ffirm.

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural

history of the case. For a recitation of the facts and procedural history of this

matter, we direct the reader to the opinion of the trial court. See Trial Court

Opinion, 4/7/15, at 1

- 3.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the certified record, and

the trial court opinion. The trial court, the Honorable David L. Ashworth, has

authored an opinion that ably disposes of the issues presented on appeal.

We affirm based on that opinion. See id ., at 3

- 32.J

- A34011

- 15

- 2

-

Order affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 2/17/2016Circulated 02/02/2016 11:27 AM
Exhibit 32



Certification of COO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the quarterly report of DataMetrics
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), John Marceca, the Chief Operating
Officer of the Company, and Edward Kroning, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 9061
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


      DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

      By:   John Marceca
         ----------------------------------
            John Marceca, President and COO

      Dated: June 1, 2007
             ------------

      By:   Edward Kroning
         ----------------------------------
            Edward Kroning, CFO

      Dated: June 1, 2007
             ------------


                                 -1-



<PAGE>





SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-QSB to be signed on
its behalf by its duly authorized representatives.


                                          DATAMETRICS CORPORATION
                                          ------------------------
                                          /s/ John Marceca
                                          President and COO


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on
behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated:

Name                          Title                         Date
-------------------           ------------------------      ---------------
/s/ John Marceca              President and COO             June 1, 2007
-------------------
    John Marceca

/s/ Edward Kroning            Chief Financial Officer       June 1, 2007
-------------------
    Edward Kroning



                                 -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,575,605
<SECURITIES>                                       567,079
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,672,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,821,561
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,401,514
<PP&E>                                          27,667,259
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,733,690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,243,505
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,510,834
<BONDS>                                            540,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           475,021
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,493,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,243,505
<SALES>                                         99,803,603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,803,603
<CGS>                                           85,523,921
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,523,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,607,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,100,062
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  83,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,349,056)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (65,676)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,283,380)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,283,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.72)



</TABLE>