alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Augustine Robert VILARO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 3, 1971.

Milton E. Grusmark, Miami Beach, for. appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Rodney Durrance, Jr., and Andrew Friedrich, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the record, briefs, and. oral argument, we conclude that appellant has not demonstrated harmful error; therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and CROSS, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,472
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  348,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                    11,545
<INVENTORY>                                    112,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               506,378
<PP&E>                                       1,073,899
<DEPRECIATION>                                 488,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,785,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          337,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,688
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,161,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,785,233
<SALES>                                      1,555,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,555,389
<CGS>                                        1,210,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,210,299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               149,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,325
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                175,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            117,976
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   117,976
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         295,954
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,823,638
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                90,618
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,025,399
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         206,785
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           206,376
<LOANS>                                      5,830,756
<ALLOWANCE>                                    102,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,857,992
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,591,613
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             93,659
<LONG-TERM>                                    319,660<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,673
<OTHER-SE>                                     627,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,857,992
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                555,817
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               49,450
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 6,639
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               611,906
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             211,029
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225,860
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          386,046
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  106,705
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                356,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                106,379
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      66,166
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,166
<EPS-BASIC>                                     197.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   197.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,081
<LOANS-PAST>                                    61,765
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0<F2>
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               121,877
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  148,880
<RECOVERIES>                                    21,634
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              102,427
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F2>
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES 92,070 IN CAPITAL NOTES
<F2> THIS INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR INTERIM REPORTING PURPOSES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Josh DOUGLAS, Jr.

No. 61155.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for supervisory writs. Parish of E. Baton Rouge.

Writ denied. No abuse of discretion.

SANDERS, C. J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted and an evidentiary hearing ordered to determine whether the other rape falls within the guidelines of *State v. Carter.*

SUMMERS, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be denied. Applicant’s showing is not sufficient to warrant the exercise of this court’s supervisory jurisdiction.

CALOGERO and MARCUS, JJ.,

concur. We do not here decide whether evidence of one crime is admissible in trial of the other.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jimmie STEWART v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 61240.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Jimmie Stewart applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied.

DIXON, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion this applicant is entitled to an out-of-time appeal on the showing made in this application. He shows he has been denied a copy of the 1970 hearing in the district court. He should therefore, at least be entitled to an eviden-tiary hearing.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 March 19, 2007

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio        43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.	Other Events
----------	--------------------------------------------

     On March 16, 2007, the company issued its annual letter to shareholders.
A copy of the press release issued by the company is attached as Exhibit 99.1.

Item 9.01.	Financial Statements and Exhibits
----------	--------------------------------------------

     (c) Exhibits.

     99.1	Press release dated March 19, 2007 issued by the company.


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: March 19, 2007                         By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the quarterly report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Bertram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Rafik Moursalien, the
Controller of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   . The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

      DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

      By: Daniel Bertram
      --------------------------------------
          Daniel Bertram, CEO

      Dated: July 20, 2006


      By: Rafik Moursalien
      --------------------------------------
          Rafik Moursalien, CFO

      Dated: July 20, 2006
#### Delphine BRIGNAC v. D. H. HOLMES CO., LTD.

No. 60231.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: Delphine Brignac applying for remedial writ.

Writ refused. No error in ruling of trial judge.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet of CNL Income Fund X, Ltd. at December 31, 1996, and its
statement of income for the year then ended and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the Form 10-K of CNL Income Fund X, Ltd. for the
year ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,769,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      16,123,171
<DEPRECIATION>                                 898,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,437,560
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,222,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,437,560
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,602,161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  410,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,461,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,461,812
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,461,812
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Due to the nature of its industry, CNL Income Fund X, Ltd. has an
unclassified balance sheet; therefore, no values are shown above for
current assets and current liabilities.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph JONES, Petitioner, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY and Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 71-215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 21, 1972.

George H. Brown, III, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

Hal S. McClamma, Tallahassee, and James R. Parks, Miami, for respondent Florida Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied. See Dawkins v. Florida Industrial Commission, Fla.App.2d 1963, 155 So.2d 153; Newkirk v. Florida Industrial Commission, Fla.App.2d 1962, 142 So.2d 750.

HOBSON, Acting C. J., and MANN and McNULTY, JJ., concur.
Appeal Ordered Withdrawn and Opinion issued March 29,2000

In The

tottrt nf Appeals

Mill} SHstrict of Qtexa© at Dallas

No. 05-99-01858-CR

DAVID ALFORD, Appellant

V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F94-49350-HP

OPINION PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Kinkeade and O'Neill

Appellant has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal. Appellant's counsel has approved

the motion.

This Court hereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERS the appeal withdrawn and that

this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JULY 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,312,594
<SECURITIES>                                   584,679
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,944,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,381,633
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,601,031
<PP&E>                                      23,393,582
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,759,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,663,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       25,581,318
<BONDS>                                      1,286,788
<COMMON>                                       468,203
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,050,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,663,562
<SALES>                                     70,146,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            70,146,954
<CGS>                                       55,699,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               55,699,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,964,427
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               373,590
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,063,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                   428,365
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   634,936
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09



</TABLE>
JOHNNY COPELAND

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2772

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed December 4, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Wakulla County

. Dawn Caloca

- Johnson , Judge

.

Johnny Copeland, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
EX-10.62



 Exhibit 10.62 
 Summary of Compensation for Directors 
 As of December 31, 2013, PC Connection,
Inc.’s directors consisted of: (i) Joseph Baute; (ii) David Beffa-Negrini; (iii) Barbara Duckett; (iv) Patricia Gallup; (v) David Hall; and (vi) Donald Weatherson. Each director receives an annual retainer of
$75,000, payable quarterly, for service on the Board. Each independent director also receives an annual retainer of $15,000, payable quarterly, for participation in the Board’s audit and compensation committees. In addition, Board members who
act in a chairman capacity receive annual fees as follows: Board chair, $35,000; Board vice-chair, $10,000; audit committee chair, $10,000; compensation committee and sub-committee chair, $5,000. On December 3, 2013, each director was awarded
2,500 restricted stock units, valued at a price of $23.36 per unit, of which 500 restricted stock units vested on the grant date. The remaining restricted stock units vest in four equal annual installments beginning on December 3, 2014. The
restricted stock awards are settled in equivalent shares of our common stock upon vesting. The table below sets forth the retainer fees paid for 2013: 
  

																	
	 Director
	  	Annual
Retainer	 	  	Chairman
Fees	 	  	Audit 
and
Compensation
Committee	 	  	Total
Retainer
Fee Paid
for
2013(1)	 
	 Joseph Baute
	  	$	75,000	  	  	$	10,000	  	  	$	15,000	  	  	$	100,000	  
	 David Beffa-Negrini
	  	 	75,000	  	  				  				  	 	75,000	  
	 Barbara Duckett
	  	 	75,000	  	  	 	5,000	  	  	 	15,000	  	  	 	95,000	  
	 Patricia Gallup
	  	 	75,000	  	  	 	35,000	  	  	 	—  	  	  	 	110,000	  
	 David Hall
	  	 	75,000	  	  				  				  	 	75,000	  
	 Donald Weatherson
	  	 	75,000	  	  	 	10,000	  	  	 	15,000	  	  	 	100,000	  

  

	(1)	In addition, non-officer directors receive reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings.
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               |  |  |  |  |
| Ohio                                          |   | 000-24498 |   | 65-0190407 |
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation) |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |

|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |  |
| 325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio | 43215 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)               | (Zip Code) |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

----

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |  |
| By Investment Vehicle  |
| Proprietary funds      | $ | 12,759 |  |
| Sub-advised funds      | 639 |  |
| Institutional accounts | 4,772 |  |
| Total                  | $ | 18,170 |  |

|                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |  |  |  |
| By Investment Strategy                              |
| Small Cap                                           | $ | 1,850 |  |
| Small-Mid Cap                                       | 2,926 |  |
| Large Cap                                           | 7,931 |  |
| Select (All Cap)                                    | 489 |  |
| Long-Short                                          | 4,427 |  |
| Corporate bonds                                     | 520 |  |
| Core fixed income                                   | 128 |  |
|   (Less: Investments in affiliated funds) | (101 | ) |
| Total                                               | $ | 18,170 |  |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |   | DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC. |
|   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | September 2, 2016 | By: |   | /s/ Thomas E. Line |
|   |   |   |   | Thomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer |
No. 10352.

#### O’Dell *v.*Bright.

Decided May 26, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock county.

*Mr. H. F. Burket*and *Messrs. Shay & Cogan,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. J. A.' & E. V. Bope*and *Mr. E. T. Dunn,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed because of imperfect record and of other reasons appearing of record.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.