alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4816]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ES97-24-000]


American REF-FUEL Company of Hempstead; Notice of Application

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 21, 1997, American REF-FUEL Company of 
Hempstead (Hempstead) filed an application, under Sec. 204 of the 
Federal Power Act, seeking authorization to assume an obligation as a 
guarantor in connection with the issuance of long-term series 1997 
Bonds (1997 Bonds) in an aggregate principal amount of $246,805,000 by 
the Town of Hempstead Industrial Development Agency (Agency).
    The 1997 Bonds are being issued to refund all outstanding bonds 
issued by the Agency in 1985. Pursuant to a Lease Guaranty and Security 
Agreement, Hempstead has guaranteed the payment of the principal of, 
premium, if any, and interest on the 1997 Bonds. Hempstead's payment 
obligation is, however, limited to the amount that Hempstead is 
required to make as lease payments under the Lease Agreement between 
Hempstead and the Agency. Hempstead has also pledged, assigned, and 
granted a security interests to Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, in 
all of Hempstead's right, title and interest in the Service Agreement, 
Energy Purchase Agreement, and the Company Support Agreement.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). All such motions 
or protests should be filed on or before March 3, 1997. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4816 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       8,174,240
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,004
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               546,437
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,382,659
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 18,188,134
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         691,014
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           703,087
<LOANS>                                     84,026,034
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,343,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,018,863
<DEPOSITS>                                  84,953,910
<SHORT-TERM>                                11,806,851
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,027,788
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,656,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,521,610
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,052,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             124,018,863
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,113,145
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              663,703
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               188,843
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,965,691
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,392,510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,118,499
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,847,192
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  406,086
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              65,447
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,388,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,515,269
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,035,656
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,035,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.28
<LOANS-NON>                                    528,195
<LOANS-PAST>                                   521,185
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   280
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,343,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                (639,844)
<RECOVERIES>                                   167,955
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,343,309
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,343,309
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Report on Form 10-Q of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended February 27, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), Howard R. Levine,
as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Kenneth T. Smith, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 7, 2010

| |  |                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  | /s/ Howard R. Levine                             
| |  | Howard R. Levine                                 
| |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                    
| | 
| |  | /s/ Kenneth T. Smith                             
| |  | Kenneth T. Smith                                 
| |  | Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer  
| |  | (Principal Financial Officer)                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
_’ 

OFl=ICE OF THE AtiOlWZY G;ENE:mAL. OF TEXAS 

. .i 

AUSTIN 

. 
CI “p 3” 

. 

Hon. c. wcioaron Lau@lin - Paso 2 

~ormisnioners Court,for the purpose of socuri?lg 

such county funda, securities of the follouTng kind, 

in an ~axount equal to the mount of such county 

funds on a2p0d.t ii1 said aOpO8lt0i-y bmk, to&s: 

bonds aud notos of the United States, securities of 

indebtedness Of the UTiitcd Stetes, and other CVidences of Indebtedness of the United States, vhcn 

. s&l ovldences of lndebtcd??esa are swwOrted by the 

full faith n;za OrOait or the unitca stntos of 

~nar5.m ax&d other bonds or other evidencoe of indebtcduess which are guaranteed as to both princlpa? ._ 

and lntoroet by the United Statos Govemsnt; . . , 

“The condItTo: of tho porsoncd bond or bonds, 

or contract for sccurltien pledged, as hereinabove 

provided, shall be conditioned for the faithful. psrfomanca of all the d??tics and obligations devolving 

by law .upon such depository,. and for the payment upon :~.~.~ 

preseAation of all checks dram upon any ~dmand 

deposit’ account in any depository by the county 

treasurer of the county and all checks dram upon any 

‘tlz;?o deposit’ acoount upon pre&ntation, after the 

expiration of the pariod OS noti@ required ti tha 

case of Wme deposita, 1 and .that baid county funds 

ohall be. faithfully kept by oatd dcposltory and 

sooountcd for accord* to law.” 

’ ft is true,‘as pointed out in your letter, that 

thle law provldes that bonds and notes of the United States are 

Wcoptable under the pledge contract without e.ny requirexent- as 

t0 the negotiability of said bonds. l,lovevcr, I.mitod States \!a~ 

Eaving Bonds, Serles A, S, c and D am rc&atered In the naae of 

th0 peroon who buys then aria they recite on their face that they 

00 non-trcanofex~abble. These bonds, therefore, are not subject 

t0 being pledged since tho depository be& could not tranofcr 

my of .its rights in reforonce to them. It is true that physical 

~aee8sion of these bonds could be delivered, but if a judgment 

18 rOOovcred by the county on kho pl.edgte contract, those bonds 

could not be solid In catiofaction of this judgmnt. The bonds 

L”at~ol~ed vould not, in our opinion, be “securltics” vlthln 

the m%u-dn~ .of tho above- quoted stntutc. 

. 

-‘. 
. 

nogdifvo, 

Ho,.$herefore, ansiror your question 3.n the 

ii 

3lours.verj'truly 

I 

‘. 

. 

..&’ 

.“ 

,-^ ,...: ” 

‘--e... ..,. -._
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF APRIL 30, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>             1

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,542,173
<SECURITIES>                                   549,677
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,401,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,353,556
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,098,584
<PP&E>                                      25,368,660
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,034,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,142,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,561,350
<BONDS>                                        848,183
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       474,466
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,017,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,142,684
<SALES>                                     31,791,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,791,862
<CGS>                                       26,452,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,452,035
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,332,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               612,742
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,605,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (65,676)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,514,111)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,514,111)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)



</TABLE>
#### FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, etc., Petitioner, v. Charles BROWN, Respondent.

No. 40954.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 14, 1971.

Certiorari be and the same is hereby denied. 245 So.2d 307.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 12

- 00490

- CV

LUIS MEDINA AND STEPHANIE MEDINA

v. HATCH ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS, INC.

On Appeal from the 267th District Court of Calhoun County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 08

- 08

- 0577

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPE ALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 20 , 2014
254 La. 842

#### Reverend Manno M. SNYDER v. AUTOMOBILE OWNERS SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY and Standard Life & Accident Insurance Company.

No. 50092.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Automobile Owners Safety Insurance Company and Standard Life & Accident Insurance Company applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 225 So.2d 275.

Writ refused. There is no error in the judgment complained of.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3910]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION

Sunshine Act Meeting; of the Presidential Search Committee of the 
Board of Directors

TIME AND DATE: The Presidential Search Committee of the Legal Services 
Corporation Board of Directors will meet by teleconference on February 
20, 1997, at 9:00 a.m.

STATUS OF MEETING: Although a portion of the meeting will be open to 
the public, most of it will be closed pursuant to a unanimous vote of 
the Board of Directors to hold an executive session. At the executive 
session, the Committee will hear a status report by representatives of 
the independent search firm assisting the committee to identify and 
recruit candidates for the position of President of the Legal Services 
Corporation and will provide direction to the search firm. It is 
anticipated that specific individuals will be selected to be 
interviewed in March.
    The closing is authorized by the relevant provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act [5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b(c)(2) & (6)] and the 
corresponding regulation of the Legal Services Corporation [45 C.F.R. 
Sec. 1622.5(a) & (e)]. A copy of the General Counsel's Certification 
that the closing is authorized by law will be posted for public 
inspection at Corporation headquarters, 750 First Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20002, in its 11th floor reception area, and will also 
be available upon request.

LOCATION: Members of the Committee and directors wishing to 
participate, as well as members of the Corporation's staff and the 
public, will be able to hear and participate in the meeting by means of 
telephonic conferencing equipment set up for this purpose in the 
Corporation's Conference Room, on the 11th floor of 750 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20002.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Open Session

1. Approval of agenda.
2. Approval of executive session minutes of Nov. 22, 1996.
3. Approval of minutes of Jan. 22, 1997.
4. Approval of executive session minutes of Jan. 22, 1997

Closed Session

5. Discussion with and direction to representatives of Isaacson 
Miller, the independent search firm assisting the committee to 
identify candidates for consideration for the position of President 
of the Legal Services Corporation, about specific candidates for the 
position.
6. Selection of specific individuals for interview in March.

Open Session

7. Other business, including public comment and scheduling of the 
Committee's next meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Victor M. Fortuno, General Counsel & 
Secretary of the Corporation, (202) 336-8810.

SPECIAL NEEDS: Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Barbara Asante, at (202) 336-8800.

Dated: February 11, 1997.
Victor M. Fortuno,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-3910 Filed 2-12-97; 2:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
258 La. 354

#### Henry M. DELAHOUSSAYE v. Anthony Henry ACKAL et al.

No. 51273.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Henry M. Delahoussaye applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Martin. 244 So.2d 111.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 3, 2019














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of December 31, 2018 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$13,440Sub-advised funds1,358Institutional accounts4,310Total$19,108





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,048Small-Mid Cap2,770Mid Cap143Large Cap9,637All Cap Select432Long-Short3,767Global/International18Short Duration Fixed Income579Core Fixed Income55Long Duration Fixed Income52Corporate Credit757High Yield54(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(204)Total$19,108








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:January 3, 2019By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                  5,356,000
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           18,617,000
<ALLOWANCES>                            388,000
<INVENTORY>                             10,464,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        37,187,000
<PP&E>                                  56,872,000
<DEPRECIATION>                          39,236,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          57,749,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   13,643,000
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                778,000
<OTHER-SE>                              39,837,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            57,749,000
<SALES>                                 29,743,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        29,743,000
<CGS>                                   22,001,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           22,001,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        4,990,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      24,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         2,728,000
<INCOME-TAX>                            1,006,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,722,000
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,722,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.21
        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STANLEY MARCUS GALYEAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES INC.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 14

- 35604

D.C. No. 2:13

- cv
- 01359

- MJP

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Marsha J. Pechman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016 **

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges

. Stanley Marcus Galyean appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of the
foreclosure of his home. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 22 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 35604

de novo the district court’s dismissal under Federal R ule of Civil Procedure
12(b)(6), Hebbe v. Pliler , 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010) , and we affirm

. To the extent that Galyean raises his contract claims on appeal, t he district
court properly dismissed them because Galyean failed to allege facts sufficient to
state a plausible claim for relief. See Hebbe , 627 F.3d at 341

- 42 (although pro se
pleadings are liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations
sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief) ; see also Zuver v. Ai rtouch

Communications, Inc. , 103 P.3d 753, 759

- 68 (Wash. 2004) (discussing
unconscionability of contracts under Washington law) . Galyean waived any
challenge to the dismissal of his other claims , most of which were dismissed as

time

- barred, by failing to explain in his opening brief how the district court erred.

See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n appeal, arguments
not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”).
We reject as without merit Galyean ’s contentions that Defendant IndyMac
Federal Bank did not exist at the time defendants foreclosed on his home, that his
loan was improperly “converted to an eMortgage,” and that he had the right to
demand production of his promissory note prior to paying it.

AFFIRMED.