18340 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, March 21, 2013. 

Margaret McCloskey Shanks, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2013–06912 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Change in Bank Control Notices; 

Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or 

Bank Holding Company 

The notificants listed below have 

applied under the Change in Bank 

Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and 

§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12 

CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank 

or bank holding company. The factors 

that are considered in acting on the 

notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of 

the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for 

immediate inspection at the Federal 

Reserve Bank indicated. The notices 

also will be available for inspection at 

the offices of the Board of Governors. 

Interested persons may express their 

views in writing to the Reserve Bank 

indicated for that notice or to the offices 

of the Board of Governors. Comments 

must be received not later than April 9, 

2013. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 

(Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 

President) 701 East Byrd Street, 

Richmond, Virginia 23261–4528: 

1. Gordon A. Baird, Darien, 

Connecticut; individually and as part of 

a group acting in concert with Alvin G. 

Hageman, Westport, Connecticut, and 

Baird Hageman & Co., LLC, Darien, 

Connecticut, to acquire voting shares of 

Independence Bancshares, Inc., and 

thereby indirectly acquire voting shares 

of Independence National Bank, both in 

Greenville, South Carolina. 

B. Federal Reserve Bank of 

Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 

Community Affairs Officer) 90 

Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, 

Minnesota 55480–0291: 

1. Jack W. Steele Irrevocable Trust 

and the 2012 Donna D. Steele 

Irrevocable Trust (‘‘Trusts’’), both of 

Huron, South Dakota; Preston B. Steele, 

and Tasha J. Lee, individually and as cotrustees of Trusts, both of Huron, South 

Dakota; and American Bank & Trust, 

Wessington Springs, South Dakota, as 

trustee of Trusts, to retain or acquire 

voting shares of Leackco Bank Holding 

Company, Inc., Wolsey, South Dakota, 

and thereby indirectly retain and 

acquire voting shares of American Bank 

& Trust, Wessington Springs, South 

Dakota, and American State Bank of 

Pierre, Pierre, South Dakota. 

C. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. 

Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 

North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201– 

2272: 

1. Victor Abraham, Irving, Texas; to 

acquire voting shares of Providence 

Bancshares Corporation, and thereby 

acquire voting shares of Providence 

Bank of Texas, SSB, both in Southlake, 

Texas. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, March 20, 2013. 

Michael J. Lewandowski, 

Assistant Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2013–06775 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and 

Mergers of Bank Holding Companies 

The companies listed in this notice 

have applied to the Board for approval, 

pursuant to the Bank Holding Company 

Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) 

(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 

225), and all other applicable statutes 

and regulations to become a bank 

holding company and/or to acquire the 

assets or the ownership of, control of, or 

the power to vote shares of a bank or 

bank holding company and all of the 

banks and nonbanking companies 

owned by the bank holding company, 

including the companies listed below. 

The applications listed below, as well 

as other related filings required by the 

Board, are available for immediate 

inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 

indicated. The applications will also be 

available for inspection at the offices of 

the Board of Governors. Interested 

persons may express their views in 

writing on the standards enumerated in 

the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the 

proposal also involves the acquisition of 

a nonbanking company, the review also 

includes whether the acquisition of the 

nonbanking company complies with the 

standards in section 4 of the BHC Act 

(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise 

noted, nonbanking activities will be 

conducted throughout the United States. 

Unless otherwise noted, comments 

regarding each of these applications 

must be received at the Reserve Bank 

indicated or the offices of the Board of 

Governors not later than April 18, 2013. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis 

(Yvonne Sparks, Community 

Development Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. 

Louis, Missouri 63166–2034: 

1. Midland States Bancorp, Inc., 

Effingham, Illinois, to acquire through 

merger, Grant Park Bancshares, Inc., 

Grant Park, Illinois, and thereby 

indirectly acquire The First National 

Bank of Grant Park, Grant Park, Illinois. 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, March 18, 2013. 

Margaret McCloskey Shanks, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2013–06839 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

[Files No. 082 3199, 122 3063, 122 3065] 

The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.; 

Dr.Jays.com, Inc., Eminent, Inc.; 

Analysis of Proposed Consent Orders 

To Aid Public Comment 

AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreements. 

SUMMARY: The consent agreements in 

this matter settle alleged violations of 

federal law prohibiting unfair or 

deceptive acts or practices or unfair 

methods of competition. The attached 

Analysis to Aid Public Comment 

describes both the allegations in the 

draft complaints and the terms of the 

consent orders—embodied in the 

consent agreements—that would settle 

these allegations. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 18, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a 

comment at https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

neimanmarcusconsent; https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

drjaysconsent; or https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

eminentconsent online or on paper, by 

following the instructions in the 

Request for Comment part of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. Write ‘‘Neiman Marcus, File No. 

082 3199’’ or ‘‘Dr.Jays.com, File No. 122 

3063’’ or ‘‘Eminent, File No. 122 3065’’ 

on your comment and file your 

comment online at https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

neimanmarcusconsent; https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

drjaysconsent; or https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

eminentconsent by following the 

instructions on the web-based form. If 

you prefer to file your comment on 

paper, mail or deliver your comment to 

the following address: Federal Trade 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

Room H–113 (Annex D), 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20580. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt 

Wilshire (202–326–2976), FTC, Bureau 

of Consumer Protection, 600 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices 18341 

1 In particular, the written request for confidential 

treatment that accompanies the comment must 

include the factual and legal basis for the request, 

and must identify the specific portions of the 

comment to be withheld from the public record. See 

FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20580. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade 

Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and 

FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is 

hereby given that the above-captioned 

consent agreements containing consent 

orders to cease and desist, having been 

filed with and accepted, subject to final 

approval, by the Commission, have been 

placed on the public record for a period 

of thirty (30) days. The following 

Analysis to Aid Public Comment 

describes the terms of the consent 

agreements, and the allegations in the 

complaints. An electronic copy of the 

full text of the consent agreement 

packages can be obtained from the FTC 

Home Page (for March 19, 2013), on the 

World Wide Web, at http://www.ftc.gov/ 

os/actions.shtm. Paper copies can be 

obtained from the FTC Public Reference 

Room, Room 130–H, 600 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, 

either in person or by calling (202) 326– 

2222. 

You can file a comment online or on 

paper. For the Commission to consider 

your comment, we must receive it on or 

before April 18, 2013. Write ‘‘Neiman 

Marcus, File No. 082 3199’’ or 

‘‘Dr.Jays.com, File No. 122 3063’’ or 

‘‘Eminent, File No. 122 3065’’ on your 

comment. Your comment—including 

your name and your state—will be 

placed on the public record of this 

proceeding, including, to the extent 

practicable, on the public Commission 

Web site, at http://www.ftc.gov/os/ 

publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of 

discretion, the Commission tries to 

remove individuals’ home contact 

information from comments before 

placing them on the Commission Web 

site. 

Because your comment will be made 

public, you are solely responsible for 

making sure that your comment does 

not include any sensitive personal 

information, like anyone’s Social 

Security number, date of birth, driver’s 

license number or other state 

identification number or foreign country 

equivalent, passport number, financial 

account number, or credit or debit card 

number. You are also solely responsible 

for making sure that your comment does 

not include any sensitive health 

information, like medical records or 

other individually identifiable health 

information. In addition, do not include 

any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or 

financial information which * * * is 

privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed 

in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 

46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 

4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include 

competitively sensitive information 

such as costs, sales statistics, 

inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, 

manufacturing processes, or customer 

names. 

If you want the Commission to give 

your comment confidential treatment, 

you must file it in paper form, with a 

request for confidential treatment, and 

you have to follow the procedure 

explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 

4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept 

confidential only if the FTC General 

Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, 

grants your request in accordance with 

the law and the public interest. 

Postal mail addressed to the 

Commission is subject to delay due to 

heightened security screening. As a 

result, we encourage you to submit your 

comments online. To make sure that the 

Commission considers your online 

comment, you must file it at https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

neimanmarcusconsent; https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

drjaysconsent; or https:// 

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ 

eminentconsent by following the 

instructions on the web-based form. If 

this Notice appears at http:// 

www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also 

may file a comment through that Web 

site. 

If you file your comment on paper, 

write ‘‘Neiman Marcus, File No. 082 

3199’’ or ‘‘Dr.Jays.com, File No. 122 

3063’’ or ‘‘Eminent, File No. 122 3065’’ 

on your comment and on the envelope, 

and mail or deliver it to the following 

address: Federal Trade Commission, 

Office of the Secretary, Room H–113 

(Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20580. If possible, 

submit your paper comment to the 

Commission by courier or overnight 

service. 

Visit the Commission Web site at 

http://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice 

and the news release describing it. The 

FTC Act and other laws that the 

Commission administers permit the 

collection of public comments to 

consider and use in this proceeding as 

appropriate. The Commission will 

consider all timely and responsive 

public comments that it receives on or 

before April 18, 2013. You can find 

more information, including routine 

uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in 

the Commission’s privacy policy, at 

http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm. 

Analysis of Agreement Containing 

Consent Orders To Aid Public Comment 

The Federal Trade Commission 

(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) has accepted, 

subject to final approval, agreements 

containing consent orders from The 

Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (‘‘Neiman 

Marcus’’), DrJays.com, Inc. (‘‘DrJays’’), 

and Eminent, Inc., doing business as 

Revolve Clothing (‘‘Revolve’’). 

The proposed consent orders have 

been placed on the public record for 

thirty (30) days for receipt of comments 

by interested persons. Comments 

received during this period will become 

part of the public record. After thirty 

(30) days, the Commission will again 

review the agreements and the 

comments received, and decide whether 

it should withdraw from the agreements 

or make the proposed orders final. 

Proposed Complaints 

These matters involve violations of 

Section 5(a) of the Federal Trade 

Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 45(a) (‘‘FTC 

Act’’), Section 5(a)(5) of the Fur 

Products Labeling Act, 15 U.S.C. 

69c(a)(5) (‘‘Fur Act’’), and Sections 

301.2(c) and 301.49 of the Rules and 

Regulations Under Fur Products 

Labeling Act, 16 CFR 301.2(c) and 

301.49 (‘‘Fur Rules’’). In 2010, Congress 

enacted the Truth in Fur Labeling Act, 

which amended the Fur Act by, among 

other things, eliminating an exemption 

for items containing fur valued at no 

more than $150. As a result, the Fur Act 

now requires disclosure of any fur 

content in wearing apparel. 

The proposed complaints allege that 

Neiman Marcus, DrJays, and Revolve 

each advertised products containing real 

fur as containing ‘‘faux fur’’ on its 

Internet site. The proposed complaints 

further allege that the advertisements 

failed to disclose the names, as set forth 

in the Fur Products Name Guide, 16 

CFR 301.0, of the animals that produced 

the fur in each product. They also allege 

that most of the products had labels 

correctly identifying the fur content. 

The proposed complaint against 

Neiman Marcus alleges that the 

company’s Web site misrepresented the 

fur content and failed to disclose the 

animal name for three products: an 

Outerwear Jacket, a Ballerina Flat by 

Stuart Weitzman, and a Kyah Faux FurCollar Coat. In addition to falsely 

advertising the Ballerina Flat online as 

‘‘faux’’ fur, Neiman Marcus’ catalog and 

mail advertising falsely represented that 

the product’s fur was mink when it was 

in fact rabbit. The proposed complaint 

further alleges that Neiman Marcus sold 

at least 316 units of the three products. 

Finally, it alleges that Neiman Marcus 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18342 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 58 / Tuesday, March 26, 2013 / Notices 

failed to disclose the country of origin 

of each product. 

The proposed complaint against 

DrJays alleges that the company 

misrepresented the fur content and 

failed to disclose the animal name for 

three products: a Snorkel Jacket by 

Crown Holder; a Fur/Leather Vest by 

Knoles & Carter; and a New York 

Subway Leather Bomber Jacket by 

United Face. It further alleges that 

DrJays sold at least 241 units. 

The proposed complaint against 

Revolve alleges that the company 

misrepresented the fur content and 

failed to disclose the animal name for 

four products: an Australia Luxe 

Collective Nordic Angel Short Boot; a 

Marc Jacobs Runway Roebling Coat; a 

Dakota Xan Fur Poncho; and an Eryn 

Brinie Belted Faux Fur Vest. It further 

alleges that Revolve sold at least 158 

units of the products. 

Proposed Orders 

The proposed orders are designed to 

prevent Neiman Marcus, DrJays, and 

Revolve from engaging in similar acts 

and practices in the future. 

Paragraph I bars each proposed 

respondent from violating the Fur Act 

and Rules by, among other things, 

misrepresenting in mail, catalog, or 

Internet advertisements that the fur in 

any product is faux or fake or 

misrepresenting the type of fur. 

Paragraph I also contains a proviso 

incorporating the Enforcement Policy 

Statement that the Commission 

announced on January 3, 2013. The 

proviso and Statement provide a safe 

harbor when a retailer cannot legally 

obtain a guaranty, as long as the retailer 

meets certain requirements, including 

that it neither knew nor should have 

known of the violation. 

Paragraphs II though IV will help the 

Commission ensure that the proposed 

respondents comply with Part I by 

requiring them to keep copies of 

advertisements and materials relied 

upon in disseminating any 

representation covered by the orders 

(Paragraph II); provide copies of the 

orders to certain personnel having 

responsibility for the advertising or sale 

of fur and fake fur products (Paragraph 

III); and provide certain notices and 

compliance reports to the Commission 

(Paragraph IV). 

Finally, Part V provides that the 

orders will terminate after twenty (20) 

years, with certain exceptions. 

The purpose of this analysis is to 

facilitate public comment on the 

proposed orders. It is not intended to 

constitute an official interpretation of 

the complaints or the proposed orders, 

or to modify the proposed orders’ terms 

in any way. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2013–06785 Filed 3–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 

SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

[OMB Control No. 9000–0026; Docket 2012– 

0076; Sequence 18] 

Federal Acquisition Regulation; 

Submission for OMB Review; Change 

Order Accounting 

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DOD), 

General Services Administration (GSA), 

and National Aeronautics and Space 

Administration (NASA). 

ACTION: Notice of request for public 

comments regarding an extension to an 

existing OMB clearance. 

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, the 

Regulatory Secretariat will be 

submitting to the Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) a request to review 

and approve an extension of a 

previously approved information 

collection requirement concerning 

change order accounting. A notice was 

published in the Federal Register at 77 

FR 51804, on August 27, 2012. One 

comment was received. 

Public comments are particularly 

invited on: Whether this collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of functions of the Federal 

Acquisition Regulations (FAR), and 

whether it will have practical utility; 

whether our estimate of the public 

burden of this collection of information 

is accurate, and based on valid 

assumptions and methodology; ways to 

enhance the quality, utility, and clarity 

of the information to be collected; and 

ways in which we can minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, through 

the use of appropriate technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

April 25, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

identified by Information Collection 

9000–0026, Change Order Accounting, 

by any of the following methods: 

• Regulations.gov: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Submit comments via the Federal 

eRulemaking portal by inputting 

‘‘Information Collection 9000–0026, 

Change Order Accounting’’ under the 

heading ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID’’ and 

selecting ‘‘Search’’. Select the link 

‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that corresponds 

with ‘‘Information 9000–0026, Change 

Order Accounting’’. Follow the 

instructions provided at the ‘‘Submit a 

Comment’’ screen. Please include your 

name, company name (if any), and 

‘‘Information Collection 9000–0026, 

Change Order Accounting’’ on your 

attached document. 

• Fax: 202–501–4067. 

• Mail: General Services 

Administration, Regulatory Secretariat 

(MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: Hada 

Flowers/IC 9000–0026, Change Order 

Accounting. 

Instructions: Please submit comments 

only and cite Information Collection 

9000–0026, Change Order Accounting, 

in all correspondence related to this 

collection. All comments received will 

be posted without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal and/or business confidential 

information provided. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Michael O. Jackson, Procurement 

Analyst, Office of Governmentwide 

Acquisition Policy, GSA, (202) 208– 

4949, or email at 

michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose 

FAR 43.205 allows a contracting 

officer, whenever the estimated cost of 

a change or series of related changes 

under a contract exceeds $100,000, to 

assert the right in the clause at FAR 

52.243–6, Change Order Accounting, to 

require the contractor to maintain 

separate accounts for each change or 

series of related changes. Each account 

shall record all incurred segregable, 

direct costs (less allocable credits) of 

work, changed and unchanged, 

allocable to the change. These accounts 

are to be maintained until the parties 

agree to an equitable adjustment for the 

changes or until the matter is 

conclusively disposed of under the 

Disputes clause. This requirement is 

necessary in order to be able to account 

properly for costs associated with 

changes in supply and research and 

development contracts that are 

technically complex and incur 

numerous changes. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES