alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sam LEE, Appellant v. DOMESTIC FINANCE CORPORATION OF MIAMI #1, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1045.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 99-2**

***CERTIFICATION OF KEENAN BEHRLE, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF WESTMINSTER CAPITAL,INC.***

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”)for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of Westminster Capital, Inc. (the “Issuer”). 

I, Keenan Behrle, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

|                     |        |                                                                                      |
|---------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: May 20, 2003 |   |                                                                                 |
|                | By     | /s/ KEENAN BEHRLE                                                                    |
|                |   |                                                                                      |
|                |   | **Keenan Behrle**                                                                    |
|                |   | **Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer** |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4971]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER96-3105-000]


Boston Edison Company; Notice of Filing

February 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 6, 1997, Boston Edison Company tendered 
for filing an amendment in the above-referenced docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before March 3, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4971 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
May 27, 2015 

 

Mr. James King 

6386 S. Old 3C Highway 

Westerville, OH 43082 

Dear Mr. James King: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 16, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1046), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of the Secretary 

May 17, 2006 

Claudia R. Higgins, Esq.

Kaye Scholer LLP

901 Fifteenth Street, NW

Suite 1100

Washington, D.C. 20005

Re: Proposed Sale of the Meow Mix Company 

In the Matter of Nestle Holdings, Inc. And Ralston Purina Company 

Docket No. C-4028 

Dear Ms. Higgins: 

This is in reference to the Petition of The Cypress Group, LLC for Prior Approval of the 

Sale of The Meow Mix Company to Del Monte Foods, filed by The Cypress Group (“Cypress”) 

and received March 22, 2006. Pursuant to the Decision and Order in Docket No. C-4028, 

Cypress requests prior approval of its proposal to sell The Meow Mix Company to the Del Monte 

Corporation. 

After consideration of Cypress’ Petition and other available information, the Commission 

has determined to approve the proposed sale as set forth in Cypress’ Petition. In according its 

approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and the representations 

made in connection with Cypress’ Petition, assuming them to be accurate and complete. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark 

Secretary 

cc: Frank M. Hinman, Esq.

Bingham McCutchen

Three Embarcadero Center

San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Joseph Sinicropi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




       Date:  August 7, 2006





                                            /S/ JOSEPH SINICROPI
                                            --------------------
                                                Joseph Sinicropi
                                               Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 62 FR 408, 
January 3, 1997.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 10:45 a.m., 
Wednesday, January 8, 1997.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: Addition of the following closed item(s) to the 
meeting: Guidance on international supervisory coordination.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: January 3, 1997.

Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-459 Filed 1-6-97; 9:49 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000026379
<NAME> YELLOWAVE CORPORATION

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,506,967
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,725,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,231,967
<PP&E>                                          21,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,841,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,398,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,827,486
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,946,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,841,391
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,136
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (654,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (655,790)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 708,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,210
<EPS-BASIC>                                    ($0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.26)


</TABLE>
#### John Ernest BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-673.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; John G. Ferris, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Cyrk, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Cyrk, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-75194, 33-89534 and
333-45655) of our report dated February 13, 1998 except as to the information
presented in Note 18, for which the date is March 4, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule of Cyrk,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended
December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.




                                       Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.



Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1998
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
OF ARGON ST, INC. We, the undersigned, being the chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of Argon ST, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, to the
best of our information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended April 3, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Terry L. CollinsTerry L. CollinsChief Executive Officer/s/ Donald F. FultzDonald F. FultzChief Financial Officer
 Dated: May 11, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
has been provided to Argon ST, Inc. and will be retained by Argon ST, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
259 La. 799

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Albert REED v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51810.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 13, 1971.

In re: Albert Reed applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief prayed for.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7422 

To require the Federal financial regulators to issue guidance to encourage 

depository institutions to establish programs to educate customers at 

risk of unwittingly becoming money mules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2020 

Ms. GABBARD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Federal financial regulators to issue guidance 

to encourage depository institutions to establish programs to educate customers at risk of unwittingly becoming money mules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Money Mule Awareness 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7422 IH

1 (1) Criminals frequently recruit unwitting par2 ticipants to move and hide illicit funds through the 

3 U.S. financial system. 

4 (2) The Federal Trade Commission has issued 

5 materials to help educate consumers about money 

6 mule schemes. 

7 (3) In April 2020, the Federal Bureau of Inves8 tigation issued a warning and guidance to the public 

9 of money mule schemes exploiting the COVID–19 

10 pandemic. 

11 (4) Depository financial institutions can be un12 witting participants in fraudulent transactions by 

13 money mules and should be encouraged to educate 

14 at-risk customers of money mule schemes. 

15 SEC. 3. GUIDANCE ON MONEY MULE EDUCATION PRO16 GRAMS. 

17 (a) GUIDANCE.—The Federal financial regulators 

18 shall, jointly, issue guidance to encourage depository insti19 tutions to establish programs to educate customers at risk 

20 of unwittingly becoming money mules. 

21 (b) CONSULTATION.—In issuing the guidance re22 quired under subsection (a), the Federal financial regu23 lators shall consult with the Attorney General, the Direc24 tor of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7422 IH

1 of the United States Secret Service, and the Federal 

2 Trade Commission. 

3 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION.—The term ‘‘de5 pository institution’’— 

6 (A) has the meaning given that term under 

7 section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; 

8 and 

9 (B) means a State credit union and a Fed10 eral credit union, as such terms are defined 

11 under section 101 of the Federal Credit Union 

12 Act. 

13 (2) FEDERAL FINANCIAL REGULATORS.—The 

14 term ‘‘Federal financial regulators’’ means the 

15 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 

16 the Comptroller of the Currency, the Director of the 

17 Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Federal 

18 Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the National 

19 Credit Union Administration Board. 

20 (3) MONEY MULE.—The term ‘‘money mule’’ 

21 means a person who transfers illegally acquired 

22 money on behalf of or at the direction of another. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00874-CV

Juan Alberto CASTILLO and Ana L. Perez,

Appellants

v.

COMPASS BANK,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CVD-000024-L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR 

WANT OF PROSECUTION.

We order that appellee Compass Bank recover its costs of appeal, if any, from appellants 

Juan Alberto Castillo and Ana L. Perez. 

SIGNED April 15, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Terry THOMPSON.

No. 62154.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Terry Thompson, applying for writs of certiorari and review. Parish of LaSalle.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Edwin R. Hughes, Judge of the 28th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of LaSalle, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 2nd day of June, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Di Giorgio  Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 25, 2004, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),
Richard B. Neff,  as Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  and Lawrence S.
Grossman,  as Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  each hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 8, 2004



/s/ Richard B. Neff
-------------------
Richard B. Neff
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Lawrence S. Grossman
------------------------
Lawrence S. Grossman
Chief Financial Officer


This   certification   accompanies   each  Report  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

**In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-K of THQInc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianJ. Farrell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, that:**

 

**(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and**

**(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.**

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian J.  Farrell    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Brian J.  Farrell        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | June 14,  2004           |

 

1

----
255 La. 789

#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Judy MERRICK.

No. 50454.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 24, 1970.

In re: Judy Merrick applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus.

Application is denied. Ruling complained of is correct.
Exhibit 10.19


 


Miller Industries, Inc.




8503 Hilltop Drive


Ooltewah, TN 37363




 


November 27, 2013


 


VIA EMAIL


Mr. Jeffrey I. Badgley


1905 Stoney Creek Drive


Chattanooga, TN 37421


 


Re:  Employment and Change in Control Agreements


 


Dear Mr. Badgley:


 


At its meeting on November 4, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company made the determination to terminate the automatic renewing feature of your Employment Agreement and the associated change in Control Agreement, as each was amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008.  As such, I have been directed to provide you with Notice of such action.


 


Accordingly, effective December 31, 2013, under paragraph 3 of the Employment Agreement between you and the Company, as amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008 and under Paragraph II of the Change in Control Agreement between you and the Company, as amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008, the Term of the Agreements will not be extended.


 


All other terms of the Agreements shall remain unchanged.


 


Please acknowledge receipt of this letter by signing in the space provided below and return to me by email.



 



	 	 	 
Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
/s/ Frank Madonia

	 
	 	 	 
Frank Madonia,

	 
	 	 	 
General Counsel

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
FM/jf

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
Receipt acknowledged

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
 
/s/ Jeffrey I. Badgley



	 	 	 
	 
 
Jeffrey I. Badgley