Dated: June 26, 2002

By

Chul Pak
William Diaz
April Tabor

Counsel Supporting the Complaint

Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission

Washington, DC 20580
(202) 326-2333

Chat FEL ae

Chul Pak


ATTORNEYS ENTITLED TO NOTICE

qd) Chul Pak
Mergers II Division, Bureau of Competiion
Federal Trade Commission
601 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580
{202) 326-2661

on behalf of Complaint Counsel,

and

Q) James V, Kearney
Bruce J. Prager
E. Marcellus Williamson
Steven H. Schulman
Geoffrey A, Manne
Matthew R. VanderGaot
Stephen J. Spiegelhaller

LATHAM & WATKINS

555 Eleventh Street, NW.
Suite 1000

Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
tel: (202) 637-2200

fax: (202) 637-2201

Richard C. Weisberg
512 Prescotl Read
Merion, PA 19066
(610) 664-9405

on behalf of Defendant Libbey Inc.;

William S. D’ Amico

Marvin R, Lange

Marta Pulaski-Kelly .
CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP
1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C, 20036

tel: (202) 974-5600

fax: (202) 974-5602

on behalf of Defendant Newell Rubbermaid, Ine.


Dated: June 26, 2002

By

LATHAM & WATKINS

James V. Keamey

Brice J. Prager

E. Marcellus Williamson
Steven H, Schulman
Geoffrey 4. Manne
Matthew R, VanderGoot
Stephen J. Spiegelhalter

555 Eleventh Street, N.W.
Suite 1000

Washington, DC 20004
Tel: {202} 637-2200

Fax: (202) 637-2201

Richard C. Weisberg

512 Prescott Road
Merion, PA 19066
Tel: (610) 664-9405

Attorneys for Respondent
Libbey Inc.

Matthew R. VanderGoot
matthew. vandergoot@lw.com

CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP

William S. D'Amico
Marvin Lange
Marta Pulaski-Kelly

1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036

Tel: (202) 974-5600

Fax: (202) 974-5602

Attameys for Respondent
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.
SS
—

Marta Pulaski-Kelly
MPoulaski-Kelly@chadbourne.com



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE TIE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of
LIBBEY INC., a corporation,
Docket No. 9301

and

NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC., a corporation.

Le ee a ee ee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Matthew R, VanderGoot, hereby certify that on June 26, 2002 4 copy of
Respondents and Complaint Counse]’s Joint Motion to Extend the Deadline for

the Scheduling Conference was served via hand delivery on the following:

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell (two copies)
Administrative Law Judge

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N,W., Room 104
Washington, D.C, 20580

Chul Pak

Mergers II Division, Bureau of Competition
Federal ‘Trade Commission

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, 1.C. 20580

gor

é Cte a) “ey i



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

\

In the Matter of
PUBLIC
LIBBEY INC., « corporation,

and

)
)
)
}
) Docket No. 9301
)
)
NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC., a corporation. —)
)

TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Pursuant to §4.3{b) of the Commission's Rules, 16 C.F.R. §4.3(b), Respondents
Libbey Ine. (“Libbey”) and Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. (“Newell Rubbermaid”) and Complaint
Counsel respectfully request a two-week postponement of the prehearing scheduling conference
scheduled for June 27, 2002. Respondents and Complaint Counsel require the additional time in
order to conclude settlement discussions.

As related in their June 10, 2002 motion, Respondents have terminated the
January 21, 2002, Stock Purchase Agreement (“Agrocment”) relating to Libbey’s proposed
purchase of Newel] Rubbermaid’s Anchor Hocking division (the Agreement superseded the
original June 17, 2001 Stock Purchase Agreement). Accordingly, on June 1J, 2002, Libbey and
Newell Rubbermaid cach withdrew their respective Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements
Act (“HSR”) Notifications from the Promerger Notification Office.

Respondents and Complaint Counsel are discussing an apprepriate means of
concluding the adjudicative proceeding. However, an additional two weeks is necessary for

Respondents and Complaint Counsel to reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Specifically,



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

)

In the Matter of }

)

LIBBEY INC., a corporation, }
) Docket No, 9301

and }

}

NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC., a corporation. —)

J

PROPOSED ORDER

The Scheduling Conference in the above captioned matter was originally rescheduled for
June 27, 2002. Respendents Libbey Inc. and Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. and Complaint Counsel
having moved for an order to extend the deadline for the Scheduling Conferenee and for good

cause shown,

IV IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Contercnee is postponed until July 11,

2002.

D. Michael Chappell
Administrative Law Judge

Dated: June, 2002


Complaint Counsel has proposed a consent agreement under which the Commission would be
entitled to prior notice if: (i) Libbcy were to acquire the stock or assets of any part of Anchor
Hocking or Anchor Hocking’s food service business, or (11) Newell Rubbermaid were to sell or
transfer the assets of lhe Anchor Hocking food service business to someone other than Libbey.
Libbey agrees in principle to a consent agreement containing a prior notice provision with
respect to the Anchor Hocking food service business and is negotiating the specific elements of

such an agreement with Complaint Counsel. Newell Rubbermaid is presently considering

Complaint Counsel’s proposal.


Dated: June 26, 2002 LATHAM & WATKINS

James V. Kearney

Bruce J. Prager

E. Marcellus Williamson
Steven H. Schulman
Geoffrey A. Manne
Malthew R. VanderGoot
Stephen J. Spiegelhalter

555 Eleventh Street, N.W.
Suite 1000

Washington, DC 20004
Tel: (202} 637-2200

Fax: (202) 637-2201

Richard C. Weisberg

312 Prescott Road
Merion, PA 19066
Tel: (610) 664-9405

Attorneys for Respondent
Libbey Inc.

Matthew R. VanderGoot
matthew. vandergoul@lw.com

CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP

William S. D'Amico
Marvin Lange
Marta Pulaski-Kelly

1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036

Tel: (202) 974-5600

Fax: (202) 974-5602

Attomeys for Responéent
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.

By
Marta Pulaski-Kelly
MPulaski-Kelly@chadbourne.com

Ye

is)