alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                              Contact:  Howard F. Curd
                                        Chairman of the Board of
                                        Directors
                                        (972) 690-5888

 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

                      SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS
                  ANNOUNCES MANAGEMENT CHANGES

Dallas,  Texas,  July  21,  1997 -- SA  Telecommunications,  Inc.
(Nasdaq-STEL)  today announced the resignation of Jack  W.  Matz,
Jr.  as  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company  and
the  election  of  Howard F. Curd as Chairman  of  the  Board  of
Directors.   Mr. Matz will continue as a director of the  Company
and will serve as a consultant to the Company.

During the past two weeks, John H. Nugent replaced Paul R. Miller
as the Interim President and Chief Operating Officer, and John Q.
Ebert  resigned  as a  director  of the  Company.  Mr. Nugent, a
director of the  Company since July 1995, was elected  as a Vice
President of the Company in September 1996.

Mr.  Curd has served as a director of SA Telecommunications since
September  1995.  Mr Curd also serves as Chief Executive  Officer
and  director  of  Jesup  &  Lamont  Capital  Holdings,  Inc.,  a
diversified financial holding company, and serves as  an  officer
and director of its two operating subsidiaries.  In addition, Mr.
Curd  is  a  director  of  EMCORE Corporation,  a  publicly  held
compound  semiconductor  technology and  equipment  manufacturing
company.

Mr.  Curd stated "Over the past four years, SA Telecommunications
revenues  have grown from approximately $0.7 million in  1992  to
$35.7  million  in  1996.  Although revenue growth  is  and  will
continue  to be important, I believe the current management  team
we  have  in  place  will  concentrate on costs,  operations  and
integration of our network."

SA   Telecommunications,   Inc.  provides   a   full   range   of
telecommunications  services including:  1+,  800/888,  dedicated
services,   travel  and  debit  cards,  wireless   services   and
conference  calling.  The Company provides the  majority  of  its
services  over its switching and transmission facilities  on  the
regional network in the contiguous regions of the west, southwest
and  south central states.  For further information, please visit
SA      Telecommunications'     Internet     home     page     at
http://www.satele.com.

THIS  PRESS  RELEASE CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS  AND  AS
SUCH  INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER
FACTORS  THAT  MAY  CAUSE  THE  ACTUAL  RESULTS,  PERFORMANCE  OR
ACHIEVEMENTS OF THE COMPANY TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE
EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.  SOME OF
THE  FACTORS  THAT  MAY CAUSE SUCH MATERIAL DIFFERENCES  ARE  SET
FORTH AS RISK FACTORS DETAILED FROM TIME TO TIME IN THE COMPANY'S
PERIODIC  REPORTS  AND  REGISTRATION STATEMENTS  FILED  WITH  THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
SERVED FEBRUARY 9, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

•PARTMENTOF 

•-•iOPERMlONS 

•R - Q i—^ "? 3: 08 

IN THE MATTER OF 

INTERTECH OVERLOAD, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo. FAA-2010-0194 

AMENDED HEARING NOTICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on March 7 and 8,2011, inclusive, in the U.S. Department of Labor Courtroom, 

Suite 5150, the Glenn M. Anderson Federal Building, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, 

Long Beach, CA. 90802. Hearings will commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 

p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge 

receives the proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, 

courier or postal service. 

Attachment - Service List 

icnard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

(Maca!^;i^^<>Nfc COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration <; 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 ^ , :|: 4#. : 

Attention: Hearing Docket Cleric^ AGC-4iG 

Wilbur Wright Building ~ SuH^I^^MOO' 

O 

William H. Schultz, Respondent's Counsel 

Schultz Law Firm 

32123 Lindero Canyon Road, Suite 203 ,., , 

Westlake Village, CA 91361-5412 '••^ HfeKiC 

TEL: 818-901-1919 

FAX: 818-901-1996 i. ; 

Dean Cambe, Sr, President 

Intertech Overload, Inc., Respondent ; 

7701 Woodley Avenue 

VanNuys, CA 91406 • • -

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 r 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7128 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrntive Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in pi|t|! Otljy^^^ted cou^^ 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, ^ WSi^^i^be Avenue, S.W., Wilbur wS||itBuilding- Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hea^gTDw:3^affii;A<3C-430.
September 25, 2015

Friedrich A. Kattermann

135 Schaeffer Drive

Ro nkonkoma, NY 11779

Dear Mr. Kattermann :

Th is letter responds to your petition for exemption dated June 3 , 2015, requesting an exemption from Title 14 of The Code of Federal Regulations, §91.881

, for your Morane

Saulnier MS

- 760 airplane. Your request w as docketed as No . FAA

- 2015

- 3235

. Section

91.881 requires that after December 31, 2015, jet airplanes with a maximum takeoff weight of 75,000 pounds or less must meet Stage 3 noise requirements to operate in the contiguous

United States.

Section 506 o f the FAA Modern ization and Reform Act o f 2012 (FMRA) prohibit s the operation of jets weighing 75,000 pounds or less that do not meet Stage 3. The FMRA also

allows for the limited operation of prohibited jets for certain purposes. These provisions are

li sted in the codified statute at 49 USC 47534, and were adopted in 1 4 CFR at §§91.881 and

91.883.

The FAA is unable to grant your request for exemption from §91.881 because we have no authority to do so. The statute did not grant the FAA any authority to make exceptions to the prohibition other than as specified for limited special flight authorizations for specified

purpose s identified in the law.

You noted th at your aircraft was excluded from the FAA’s rulemaking that adopted this statutory change. Si nce the FAA was given no authority to change the statute, our analysis

conducted a t the time w as not required by law and was not meant to be comprehensive. It was designed to give interested persons and affected operators a sense of the range of aircraft subject to the statutory prohibition and the anticipated economic impact for some of the more common models in operation.2 Accordingly, we are taking no further action on your request and the docket for th is request is being closed.

Sincerely,

//s//

Lourdes Maurice Director, Environment and Energy
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

TOTAL-TEL USA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Exhibit 27 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF 
APRIL 30,1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF 
OPERATIONS FOR THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,1997 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,553,998
<SECURITIES>                                 1,006,121
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,907,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,641,461
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,918,790
<PP&E>                                      16,078,532
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,528,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,464,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,063,092
<BONDS>                                      2,940,000
<COMMON>                                       196,075
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,158,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,464,204
<SALES>                                     26,332,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,363,560
<CGS>                                       20,267,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,267,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,777,938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               238,949
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,052
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,044,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                   421,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            622,776
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   622,776
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
        





</TABLE>
### Fw: oops, my mistake... Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/12/2011 03:54 PM Jan King Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group phone: (919) 541-5665 fax: (919) 541-2664 Mailcode: C404-05
----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/12/2011 03:54 PM -----

From: "Laity, Jim" <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov> To: "Laity, Jim" <James

_ A.

_ Laity@omb.eop.gov>, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic

_J.

_ Mancini@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lea Anderson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ginger Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Randy Waite/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich Scheffe/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 07/12/2011 03:07 PM Subject: oops, my mistake...

Just read your detailed response on Set 1. I totally missed that the first sentence already says you are retaining the current secondary standards. Please accept my apologies...trying to do this too quickly!! Everything looks good to me, but I need to wait for internal clearance before you upload. I will let you know as soon as we're ready. -- jim -----Original Message----- From: Laity, Jim Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 3:03 PM To: 'Lydia Wegman'; Mancini, Dominic J. Cc: Karen Martin; John Hannon; Lea Anderson; Janet McCabe; Ginger Tennant; Randy Waite; Rich Scheffe; Jan King Subject: RE: Our response to your first set of comments Set 2 looks fine. I don't understand why you are reluctant to say explicitly up front that you are retaining the current secondary standard to protect against direct exposure to gaseous NOx/SOx. This is key info for the public and several folks who read this were initially confused. What's the big deal here. Am I missing something? Please call... 202-395-5168 -----Original Message----- From: Lydia Wegman [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:12 PM To: Laity, Jim; Mancini, Dominic J. Cc: Karen Martin; John Hannon; Lea Anderson; Janet McCabe; Ginger Tennant; Randy Waite; Rich Scheffe; Jan King Subject: Our response to your first set of commentsJim, and Do m , Attached is our response to your comments on page one of the notice in the first set of comments. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you are in agreement with these edits. Thanks. Lydia (See attached file: NOxSOx 7-12-11 set 1 comments 7-12-11 response.docx)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00846-CV

Nori Alvarez BAKER,

Appellant

v.

ORANGE PANDA, LLC and Diana Webb,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI08249

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the trial court’s denial 

of the motion to dismiss is REVERSED IN PART, and judgment is RENDERED dismissing four 

of Appellee Diana Webb’s defamation claims against Appellant Nori Alvarez Baker. The 

remainder of the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED. This case is remanded 

to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is ORDERED that the 

parties bear their own costs on appeal.

SIGNED October 28, 2020.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
November 7, 2011

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Brad Borrer918-588-7582




ONEOK Partners to Participate in Tulsa MLP Conference
  TULSA, Okla. –Nov. 7, 2011 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will present at the Tulsa Master Limited Partnership Conference on Tuesday, Nov. 8, 2011, in Tulsa, Okla.
  Terry K. Spencer, ONEOK Partners chief operating officer, will present.
  The company will post the presentation on its website that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).
  
 
 ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
  For more information, visit the Web site at www.oneokpartners.com.
  For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter@ONEOKPartners.
  ###
SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 THIS OFFER
 FROM:
     TREVOR MICHAEL  OF THE FIRST PART;
 TO:
     JASBIR GILL  OF THE SECOND PART.
  1.
     PURCHASE
AND SALE 1.1
     Agreement
to Purchase  2.
     PURCHASE
PRICE 2.1
     Price  3.
     REPRESENTATIONS
AND  WARRANTIES 3.1
     Vendor
Representations  and Warranties


3.1.1
     the
Purchased Shares are owned by the Vendor with good title thereto, free and clear of all charges, liens,
pledges or other encumbrances and rights of others; 3.1.2
     subject
to the articles and any unanimous shareholders agreement of the Corporation (and each of the parties
agree and acknowledge that there exists no shareholders agreement with respect to the Corporation or its
Shareholders as at the date hereof), the Vendor has full right, power and authority to sell, transfer and
deliver the Purchased Shares to the Purchaser; 3.1.3
     the
Vendor is not a non-resident of Canada for the purposes of section 116 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the
Act) and the sale of the Purchased Shares by the Vendor is not a disposition of taxable Canadian
property by a non-resident person within the meaning of section 116 of the Act. 3.2
     Purchasers
Representations and Warranties Investment Canada
Act
 3.3
     Survival  3.4
     Covenants 3.4.1
     The
parties hereto covenant and agree to take all corporate actions necessary to consent to the transfer of the
Purchased Shares from the Vendor to the Purchaser. 3.5
     Power
of Attorney


4.
     GENERAL 4.1
     Further
Assurances  4.2
     Non-Waiver  4.3
     Cumulative
Remedies  4.4
     Continuing
Covenants  4.5
     No
Other Agreement


4.6
     Choice
of Law  4.7
     Time  4.8
     Enurement  4.9
     Interpretation 4.9.1
In construing this document, the words Vendor and Purchaser and all
personal pronouns shall be read as the number and gender of the party or parties referred to herein require
and all necessary grammatical changes, as the context requires, shall be deemed to be made. 4.9.2
The insertion of headings in this agreement is for convenience of reference only and shall not
affect the construction or interpretation of this agreement. 4.9.3
Every provision of this agreement is intended to be severable. In the event that any term or
provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality shall not affect the
validity of the remainder of this agreement. 4.9.4
Offer and acceptance of this agreement may be performed by facsimile transmission, and if so
transmitted, such facsimile copy shall be deemed to be an original. 4.10
     Counterparts


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF
 SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED
     )in the presence of:
     )))))/s/ D. Richard Brown
     )
     /s/ Jasbir GillWitness
     )
     Jasbir Gill)))/s/ D. Richard Brown
     )
     /s/ Trevor MichaelWitness
     )
     Trevor Michael
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

March 26, 2012

Richard Parker, Esq.

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

1625 “I” Street N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20006

Re: In the Matter of Graco, Inc., Illinois Tool Works Inc., and ITW Finishing LLC

Docket No. 9350

Dear Mr. Parker:

This is to notify you that, pursuant to Paragraph II.C. of the Order to Hold Separate and

Maintain Assets issued in In the Matter of Graco, Inc., Illinois Tool Works Inc., and ITW

Finishing LLC, Docket No. 9350, the Federal Trade Commission has appointed Thomas Verhage

as Hold Separate Trustee and approved the Hold Separate Trustee Agreement executed by

respondent Graco Inc. and Mr. Verhage.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: J. Robert Robertson

Thomas Verhage
#### Elmore DOTSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-929.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 11, 1973.

Elmore Dotson, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent-defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
258 La. 208

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Nathan WALKER v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Franklin.

No. 51241.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 18, 1971.

In re: Nathan Walker applying for writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, certiorari and/or prohibition.

The application for mandamus is denied. The writ of habeas corpus pending in the district court was acted upon on March 15, 1971. The application is now moot.
No. 10553.

#### Campbell et al. *v.*McCue et al.

Decided May 19, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Douglass & Workman; Mr. Frank O. Levering; Air. S. H. Gottshall*and *Messrs. Squire, Sanders' & Dempsey-,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Solders, Thayer, Mansfield & Day,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #15548 and #15549; MAINE Disaster Number ME-00050]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Maine (FEMA-4367-DR), dated 05/30/2018. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storm and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         03/02/2018 through 03/08/2018.
 DATES: Issued on 05/30/2018. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/30/2018. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/04/2019.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/30/2018, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     York The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 155486 and for economic injury is 155490. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) James Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2018-12118 Filed 6-5-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P