alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Jordan, Ronald

To: Frank, Stephen

Cc: Jacklin, Mark J; Thomas Finseth; Flanders, Phillip; Schroeder, Cuc; Yan Zhuang

Subject: Effluent data for Keystone Generating Station

Date: Monday, May 05, 2014 2:06:43 PM

Steve,

Thank you for the very productive call on May 1st.  That helped answer many of the questions we

had about the data you have provided for the FGD wastewater treatment system at Keystone

Generating Station.  To follow up on that conversation and confirm some actions we discussed:

1. EPA requests NRG Energy to provide the available influent and effluent data for samples

analyzed using EPA Method 200.8, as mentioned in your February 21 email and discussed on

May 1st. We understand that such data includes results for arsenic, selenium and other trace

metals.  In addition, please provide the laboratory reports for these data and confirm

whether the laboratory was using a collision cell or dynamic reaction cell as part of the

analysis (and if that was so, please confirm which type was used). We do not need you to

obtain “J-value” information from the laboratory for these samples.

2. Please provide the laboratory report associated with the 2/21/13 arsenic analysis using

Method 6020.

3. Please provide the laboratory report for the 4/10/12 analysis showing 1,390 ug/L arsenic in

the FGD influent.

4. Please review process/operational data for July 2012 and August 2013 to evaluate whether

there were any unusual process changes that may be linked to the arsenic results for

7/24/12 and 8/12/13.

5. Please review process/operational data (including TSS data) for October 2012 to evaluate

whether there were any unusual process changes that may be linked to the mercury results

for 10/24/12 and 10/30/12, such as issues with either the clarifier or the gravity filters.

EPA requests that you provide the requested information by May 16, 2014. If you anticipate that will

be a problem, please let me know as soon as possible.

Again, thank you for providing the data and your assistance in resolving our questions.

Regards,

Ron

----------------------------------

Ron Jordan

EPA Office of Water

Engineering & Analysis Division (4303T)

(202) 566-1003
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Helicopter Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George J. Mehm, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 19, 2008
                                                /s/ George J. Mehm, Jr.
                                                -----------------------------
                                                George J. Mehm, Jr.
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7086-7087]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3764]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

January 31, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-0143.
    Form Number: IRS Form 2290.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: Heavy Vehicle Use Tax Return.
    Description: Form 2290 is used to compute and report the tax 
imposed by section 4481 on the highway use of certain motor vehicles. 
The information is used to determine whether the taxpayer has paid the 
correct amount of tax.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 500,625.

[[Page 7087]]

    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper:

Recordkeeping--34 hr., 55 min.
Learning about the law or the form--18 min.
Preparing, copying, and sending the form to the IRS--53 min.

    Frequency of Response: Annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 18,084,763 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-1503.
    Revenue Procedure Number: Revenue Procedure 96-53.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Section 482--Allocations Between Related Parties.
    Description: The information requested in sections 4.02, 5, 8.02, 
9, 11.01, 11.02(1), 11.04, 11.07, and 11.08 is required to enable the 
Internal Revenue Service to give advice on filing Advance Pricing 
Agreement applications, to process such applications and negotiate 
agreements, and to verify compliance with agreements and whether 
agreements require modification.
    Respondent: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 160.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent/Recordkeeper: 32 hours, 49 
minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion, annually.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 5,250 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3764 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# Server Error

## 404 - File or directory not found.

### The resource you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26505-26506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 7, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 4, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 437 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents

[[Page 26506]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-160, CP2018-230.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-12254 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a) OR 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Hilton Schlosberg, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Monster Beverage Corporation; and

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:  | April 13,   2017 | /s/ Hilton H. Schlosberg                                                                                             |   |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                  | Hilton H. Schlosberg                                                                                                 |
|   |                  | Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, Chief Operating   Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |

 

----
#### Jerome JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-455.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 21, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Tom Waddell, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
ATTENTION: STUDENT LOAN PAYMENT REDUCTION AND FORGIVENESS 

[Reference No: I IMPORTANT OFFER I 

Dear 

111111111111 IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII IIIII 11111111 

Reference No 

Student Loan Department 

1-888-895·4144 

We are pleased to inform you that you may now participate in our Student Loan Document Preparation 

and Processing Services Program. Ibis program can potentially save you thousands on your student 

loans and prepare you for Total Loan Forgiveness through applying for available government relief 

options. 

With the implementation of the Health Care and Education Affordabiljty Reconclllatlon Act of 

2010 the U.S. Department of Education has adjusted their re-payment policies. 

Vou may now be eligible for: . BORROWER • so / Month Student Loan Payment 

BALANCE $30,000 • Total Loan Forgiveness Programs 

OFF'ER TYPE Loan Forgiveness • Loan Consolidation and Program Payment Reduction 

LOAN TYPE Federal Student Loan • No Minimum Income Requirement 

REFERENCE # • No Credit Check 

. OFFER STATUS Eligible • Special Forgiveness Programs for Public Sector Employees 

To confirm your eligibility today, contact us at: 1·888-895-4144 

PM PST and provide your personal reference number 

Failure to respond to this letter may void company offer for services. 

Sincerely, 

Student Loan Department 

1·888-895-4144 

Reference No: ~ 

Disclosure: The Company does not assum& or pay consumer debts This is not a loan or a lending offer. Company provides document preparation 

and processmg services for a fee, Company products and services are optional and mutually exclu~1ve from each other. Sec terms of contract for 

complete details. We have many success stories but cannot guarantee warranty or predict the outcome In any parhcular situation. There are many 

free government programs available and you may apply on your own directly with the DOE for its services without fee. This Is not a government 

program. For more information please direct all questions and inquiries to 1-888-895-4144. 

Complaint Exhibit D-1 

Case 4:18-cv-00806 Document 1-4 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 2 
2017 

IMPORTANT 

DOCUMENT 

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL 

Account No. 

STLN#: (enclosed) 

PRESORTED 

STANDARD U.S. POSTAGE 

PAID 

SACRAMENTO. CA 

PERMIT #1935 

N I 

Q 

., 

:s 

·-.c 

>< 

w 

., 

C 

·-~ 

~ 

E 

0 

CJ 

Case 4:18-cv-00806 Document 1-4 Filed 02/07/18 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-08-2018]

On January 30, 2018, Volkswagen Group of America—Chattanooga Operations, LLC submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 134—Site 3, in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 5986—5987, February 12, 2018). On May 30, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: May 30, 2018.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-12148 Filed 6-5-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### EMMCO INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, as Subrogee of Armanda Rossini and/or Central Bank & Trust Company, Appellant, v. Henning M. JENSEN and Lumbermen’s Mutual Insurance Company, Appellees.

No. 71-377.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 14, 1971.

Eugene Tannenbaum and Jack Fils, Miami, Judith A. Brechner, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Welsh & Carroll, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of National Surety Corporation v. Bimonte, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 709.
#### Certain Lands owned by Edsel H. and Clara F. HEINLEIN and Edmor Properties, Inc. upon which Special Assessments are Delinquent, Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 23, 1971.

Alfred M. Carvajal, Miami, for appellants.

Stuart L. Simon, County Atty., and Gail P. Fels, Asst. County Atty., for appellee.

*51Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment foreclosing special assessment liens for waste fees levied by Metropolitan Dade County. The single point presented on appeal is: Does the failure of Dade County to comply with the requirements to create special purpose districts preclude their foreclosure of special assessment liens? The record reveals that this question was determined adversely to the appellant in a prior suit.

During the progress of the present litigation, appellant secured a stay for approximately one and one-half years for the purpose of bringing a suit for declaratory judgment against Dade County to determine the constitutionality of the procedures employed by the county in levying and collecting the waste fees. This suit resulted in a final judgment adverse to the appellant which held:



> “Nor does the Court find any merit in the contention that Metro can only assess such charges after the creation of a special taxing district. It is apparent from a reading of the ordinance that Metro, as such, can levy a charge and provide a waste service, or alternatively could have proceeded with the establishment of special taxing districts, if the circumstances warrant it.

> “Since the availability of garbage and waste collection and disposal is provided for tenanted and occupied property, as well as for untenanted or unoccupied property, there is no denial of equal protection, and the mechanics of the ordinance satisfy the due process clause of the constitution. In short, the Court funds no constitutional infirmity in the ordinances under consideration, nor in their applicability to the plaintiff. It is therefore, * * *."

* * * * * *

> Edmor Properties, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County No. 65C 2599 Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit dated Feb. 20, 1971.

This judgment was appealed to this court and affirmed, see Edmor Properties, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla.App.1968, 217 So.2d 622.

We therefore conclude that the trial court correctly determined that the issue was settled under the principles of res ju-dicata. Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 400; 19 Fla.Jur. Judgments and Decrees § 120 (1958).

Affirmed.
ex10-21.htm










Exhibit 10.21


 





 


March 7, 2014







South Texas Reservoir Alliance LLC


1416-B Campbell Road, Suite 204


Houston, Texas 77055


Attn.:  Sean Fitzgerald








	
  

	
Re:

	
Amended Cash Compensation -- Mississippian Acquisition












Dear Sean:







This letter memorializes the further agreement by and between South Texas Reservoir Alliance LLC (“STXRA”) and Pacific Energy Development MSL LLC (“PEDCO”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of PEDEVCO Corp. (“PEDEVCO”), regarding cash compensation due and payable to STXRA for consulting services provided by STXRA in connection with PEDCO’s acquisition of certain interests in the Mississippian formation in southern Kansas (the “Subject Acreage”) from Berexco LLC (“Berexco”), pursuant to that certain Agreement for Purchase of Term Assignment dated February 22, 2013, by and between Berexco and PEDCO (the “AFPOTA”).







PEDCO and STXRA previously entered into a letter agreement, dated March 25, 2013, as amended to date, pursuant to which PEDCO agreed to pay to STXRA a fee equal to $75.00 per net oil and gas acre in the Subject Acreage acquired by PEDCO (6,762.94 net acres) (the “Gross Commission”), payable 80% in cash, equal to $405,776.40 (the “Cash Commission”), and 20% in common stock of PEDEVCO (the “Equity Commission”), as compensation for services provided by STXRA thereunder.  The Company previously satisfied in full its obligation to issue the Equity Commission.  STXRA and PEDCO hereby agree that the Cash Commission shall be satisfied in full through the issuance by the Company to STXRA of an aggregate total of 190,000 additional shares of common stock of PEDEVCO.  Issuance shall be subject to the NYSE MKT’s approval of the listing of such shares, if and as required, and approval by the Company’s Board of Directors.







Regards,







/s/ Michael L. Peterson


Michael L. Peterson


Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Pacific Energy Development MSL LLC







Agreed to and Accepted:







South Texas Reservoir Alliance LLC







By: /s/ Sean Fitzgerald                             


Name: Sean Fitzgerald                             


Title: Manager, South Texas Reservoir Alliance LLC


Date:  March 7, 2014
ex10_22.htm


Exhibit 10.2.2

















9/18/2013


Nuwa Group LLC


1415 Oakland Blvd Ste 219


Walnut Creek, CA 94596







This is document will serve as the understanding to the contract between the parties Nuwa Group LLC and American Brewing Company (“ABC”).  Nuwa Group and ABC have agreed to remove the non-dilutive “warrant” language under the Equity Interest section from our funding agreement dated 5/13/2013.







Sincerely,







/s/ Kevin Fickle


Kevin Fickle


President, Nuwa Group LLC
#### Larry CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
FTC’s Proposed Partial Stipulated Order for 

Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment

Attachment 1C

Part 1 of 4

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 2 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 3 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 4 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 5 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 6 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 7 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 8 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 9 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 10 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 11 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 12 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 13 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 14 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 15 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 16 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 17 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 18 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 19 of 20
Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-3 Filed 06/28/16 Page 20 of 20
259 La. 802

#### O’Neil J. LEGENDRE, Jr. v. Matthew E. HILL et al.

No. 51681.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: O’Neil J. Legendre, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 250 So.2d 127.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clarence WILLIAMS.

No. 60948.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 15, 1978.

John M. Lawrence, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

September 18, 2014

Amanda Wait, Esq.

Hunton & Williams LLP

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

Re: In the Matter of Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc., 

Docket No. C-4423.

Dear Ms. Wait:

This is in reference to the Petition For Approval of Proposed Divestiture filed by Service 

Corporation International (“SCI”) and received on March 24, 2014 (“Petition”). Pursuant to the 

Decision and Order in Docket No. C-4423, SCI requests prior Commission approval of its proposal to divest certain assets to Heritage Family Funeral Services, Inc., and Heritage Family 

Cemetery, Inc. (collectively “Heritage Family”).

After consideration of SCI’s Petition and other available information, the Commission 

has determined to approve the proposed divestiture as set forth in the Petition. In according its 

approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and the representations 

made by SCI and Heritage Family in connection with SCI’s Petition and has assumed them to be 

accurate and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Paul Houston