alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-7.htm












Exhibit 10.7







Current Named Executive Officer Salary and Bonus Arrangements for 2014







Base Salaries







The base salaries for 2014 for the following executive officers of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") and Great Southern Bank (the "Bank") currently are as follows:








	
Name and Title

	 	
Base Salary

	 
	 	 
	  	 	 	 
	
William V. Turner

	 	$	200,000	 
	
Chairman of the Board of

	 
	
the Company and the Bank

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Joseph W. Turner

	 	$	300,587	 
	
President and Chief

	 
	
Executive Officer of the

	 
	
Company and the Bank

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Rex A. Copeland

	 	$	262,331	 
	
Treasurer of the Company

	 
	
and Senior Vice President and

	 
	
Chief Financial Officer of the Bank

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Steven G. Mitchem

	 	$	246,519	 
	
Senior Vice President and Chief

	 
	
Lending Officer of the Bank

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Douglas W. Marrs

	 	$	141,007	 
	
Secretary of the Company and

	 
	
Secretary, Vice President – Operations

	 
	
of the Bank

	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
Linton J. Thomason

	 	$	131,295	 
	
Vice President–Information Services

	 
	
of the Bank

	 
	 	 	 	 	 










Description of Bonus Arrangements







Pursuant to their employment agreements with the Company, each of Messrs. William V. Turner and Joseph W. Turner is entitled to an annual cash bonus equal to one-half of one percent of the Company's pre-tax net income.  For certain executive officers whose bonus arrangements are not governed by contract, the Company has maintained an incentive bonus arrangement under which the officers may earn a cash bonus of up to 15.75% of the officer's annual base salary, with up to 8.25% based on the extent to which the Company achieves targeted earnings per share results and up to 7.5% based on the officer's individual performance.
No. 11349.

#### The State, ex rel. Davio, *v.*Morrow.

Decided June 26, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Harry*
      *453
      *F. Payer,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Blandin, Rice & Ginn,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed on grounds stated in the opinion of circuit-court.

Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Bureau of Consumer Protection 

Division of Enforcement 

Hampton Newsome 

Direct Dial: (202) 326-2889 

Fax: (202) 326-2558 

Email: hnewsome@ftc.gov 

January 3, 2018 

Mr. Clark R. Silcox, General Counsel 

National Electrical Manufacturers Association 

1300 North 17th Street, Suite 900 

Rosslyn, Virginia 22209 

Dear Mr. Silcox: 

This staff opinion letter responds to your recent request for guidance regarding mercuryrelated light bulb disclosures under the FTC's Energy Labeling Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 305). The 

Rule(§ 305.15(b)) requires manufacturers to include an Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) web address ("epa.gov/cfl") on lamps containing mercury as well as on the packaging for 

those products. The EPA website provides consumers with information about the cleanup and 

disposal ofmercury-containing bulbs. When the Commission issued these disclosure 

requirements in 2010 (75 Fed. Reg. 41696), the predominant mercury-containing bulbs on the 

market were compact fluorescent lamps ("CFLs"). However, as your letter explains, other 

mercury-containing bulbs have become available more recently, including induction lamps. As 

your letter suggests, the letters "cfl" in the URL mandated by the current Rule may be confusing 

to some consumers using these newer, non-CFL bulb types. 

You are seeking guidance on whether, to minimize potential consumer confusion, 

manufacturers of these bulbs may use an alternative URL ("epa.gov/bulb") to direct consumers 

to the EPA inf01mation. Although the Rule specifies use of the "epa.gov/cfl" address, we would 

not recommend enforcement action ifmanufacturers ofnon-CFL bulbs use your suggested 

alternative address to connect consumers to the EPA website. The alternative URL would direct 

consumers to the same EPA information about lamp cleanup and disposal while avoiding 

potential confusion created by the "epa.gov/cfl" address. To that end, we have discussed this 

issue with EPA staff, and they have created the alias web address "epa.gov/bulb" to take 

consumers directly to "epa.gov/cfl." In the future, we will consider recommending Rule 

amendments that include this address as an option for manufacturers. 

The views expressed in this letter are those ofFTC staff assigned to enforce the 

Commission's Energy Labeling Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 305). In accordance with Section l .3(c) of 

the Commission's Rules ofPractice and Procedure, 16 C.F.R. § 1.3(c), this is a staff opinion only 
Page 2 

and has not been approved by the Commission or by any individual Commissioner. The advice 

provided in this letter is not binding upon the Commission and is given without prejudice to the 

right ofthe Commission later to rescind the advice and, when appropriate, to commence an 

enforcement proceeding. In conformance with Section 1.4 ofthe Commission's Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 1.4, this letter is being placed on the public record. If you have any further 

questions, please contact me at (202) 326-2889. 

Hampton ~~ Newsome 

Attorney
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE MONTH ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         321,908
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,140,932
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,445,156)
<INVENTORY>                                  4,465,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,786,409
<PP&E>                                      69,778,990
<DEPRECIATION>                            (26,130,590)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,918,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,547,033
<BONDS>                                     19,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,877,024
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,994,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,918,174
<SALES>                                     39,867,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,441,593
<CGS>                                       22,643,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,553,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,287,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,236,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,007,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                   854,598
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,865,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84


</TABLE>
Exhibit
99.1












January
      20, 2010
              
              Analyst
      Contact:
              Andrew
      Ziola918-588-7163Media
      Contact:
              Brad
      Borror918-588-7582




ONEOK
Partners Increases Quarterly Distribution
 
 TULSA,
Okla. – Jan. 20, 2010 – The board of directors of the general partner of ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) has increased the partnership’s quarterly cash
distribution to $1.10 per unit from $1.09 per unit, effective for the fourth
quarter 2009, resulting in an annualized cash distribution of $4.40 per unit.
The distribution is payable Feb. 12, 2010, to unitholders of record as of Jan.
29, 2010.
 
 “The
distribution increase reflects growing fee-based earnings as the result of our
recent completion of more than $2 billion in capital investments,” said John W.
Gibson, chairman, president and chief executive officer of the general partner
of ONEOK Partners. “As volumes associated with these completed projects continue
to ramp up, we anticipate similar distribution increases in 2010.”
 
 ONEOK
Partners has increased its distribution by more than 38 percent since April
2006, when a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) became general
partner.
 
 
 
 ONEOK
Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited
partnerships and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and
transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier
natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent
and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a
wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy
company, which owns 45.1 percent of the partnership. ONEOK is one of the largest
natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation
focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the
U.S.
 
 For more
information, visit the Web site at www.oneokpartners.com.
 
 Some of
the statements contained and incorporated in this news release are
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements relate to
financial adjustments in connection with the accelerated share repurchase
program and other matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances.
OKS-FD
 
 ###
#### Samuel ST. CLAIR and Rachel St. Clair, his wife, Appellants, v. CITY OF DUNEDIN et al., Appellees.

No. 73-90.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VICTOR PARKER

, Appellant,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FI LED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2184

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 16, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County

. Gregory S. Parker , Judge

. Victor Parker, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , fo r Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON

, and WINOKUR, J J

. , CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8771]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Minerals Management Service


Notice and Agenda for Meeting of the Royalty Policy Committee of 
the Minerals Management Advisory Board

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of the Interior (Department) 
has established a Royalty Policy Committee, on the Minerals Management 
Advisory Board, to provide advice on the Department's management of 
Federal and Indian minerals leases, revenues, and other minerals 
related policies.
    Committee membership includes representatives from States, Indian 
Tribes and allottee organizations, minerals industry associations, the 
general public, and Federal Departments.
    At this fourth meeting, the Minerals Management Service (MMS) will 
be prepared to respond to questions concerning plans to implement 
previously approved reports.
    The Committee will consider a report issued by the Appeals, 
Settlements, and Alternative Dispute Resolution subcommittee, as well 
as a report issued by the Phosphate Valuation subcommittee. 
Additionally, the Committee will hear status reports from all of the 
subcommittees that have not yet completed work.

DATES: The meeting will be held on: Friday, March 21, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-
4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites, Denver 
Southeast, 7525 East Hampden Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80231, telephone 
number (303) 696-6644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael A. Miller, Chief, Program 
Services Office, Royalty Management Program, Minerals Management 
Service, Royalty Management Program, P.O. Box 25165, MS 3060, Denver, 
CO 80225-0165, telephone number (303) 231-3413, fax number (303) 231-
3362.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The location and dates of future meetings 
will be published in the Federal Register.
    The meetings will be open to the public without advanced 
registration. Public attendance may be limited to the space available.
    Members of the public may make statements during the meeting, to 
the extent time permits, and file written statements with the Committee 
for its consideration.
    Written statements should be submitted to Mr. Michael A. Miller, at 
the address listed above. Minutes of Committee meetings will be 
available 10 days following each meeting for public inspection and 
copying at the Royalty Management Program, Building No. 85, Denver 
Federal Center, Denver, Colorado.
    These meetings are being held by the authority of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, 5 U.S.C. Appendix 1, and 
Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-63, revised.

    Dated: February 20, 1977.
Lucy R. Querques,
Associate Director for Royalty Management.
[FR Doc. 97-4705 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules Of Procedure, as amended in October 2010, notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards 55,                     *Amending Inter-entity Cost Provisions*.                

                    The Statement is available on the FASAB website at                     *http://www.fasab.gov/​accounting-standards/​*. Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

Authority:Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

Dated: May 31, 2018.

Wendy M. Payne,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2018-12265 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
----

----

EXHIBIT(32)(b)

| (1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                                                   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      October 28, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Donna L. Belusar                              |   |
|                        |   | Donna      L. Belusar                                  |   |
|                        |   | Senior      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                        |   |                                                   |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF USARADIO.COM, INC. FOR THE SIX-MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-10-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  564,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,475
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               627,776
<PP&E>                                         662,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                 464,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 825,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          821,642
<BONDS>                                        190,995
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,673
<OTHER-SE>                                    (189,611)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   825,699
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,907,866
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,990,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (101,742)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (101,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (101,742)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Gary Randolph MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-102.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Willie SIMMONS v. STATE.

No. 38350.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
#### Mary ELLEN, Appellant, v. Richard W. LYONS, Appellee.

No. 70-1126.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
2014.03.06 Exhibit 4.12


Exhibit 4.12


AMENDMENT NO. 9
TO
WINDSTREAM 401(k) PLAN


(January 1, 2011 Restatement)


WHEREAS, Windstream Corporation (the "Company") maintains the Windstream 401(k) Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2011, as subsequently amended (the "Plan"); and


WHEREAS, the Company desires further to amend the Plan;


NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective as of December 2, 2013, in the respects hereinafter set forth:


The third sentence of Section 13.01 is amended to provide as follows:


A person is eligible to receive Regular Employer Matching Contributions of a Matching Employer for a Plan Year only if he is employed as an Eligible Employee (in a position not covered by a collective bargaining agreement) on the last day of the Plan Year or if, during the Plan Year, the person died, retired, or became disabled while employed as an Eligible Employee (in a position not covered by a collective bargaining agreement) or incurred a severance from employment from the Controlled Group on account of the consummation of the sale of PAETEC Software Corp. pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September 27, 2013, by and among PAETEC Holding Corp., PAETEC Corp., PAETEC Software Corp. and TEM Holdings II, Inc..


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, by its duly authorized representative, has caused this Amendment No. 9 to the Windstream 401(k) Plan (January 1, 2011 Restatement) to be executed on this 2nd day of December, 2013.


                    
                    	
		
	WINDSTREAM CORPORATION

	 
	 

	By: 
	 /s/ Jennifer Gadberry

	Title:
	Member of the Benefits Committee
Exhibit A 

(website materials)