alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-07707, No. 333-29549, and No. 333-59633) pertaining to the
Cell Genesys, Inc. 1989 Incentive Stock Plan, the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, and the 1998 Incentive Stock Plan, of our report dated January 26, 1999
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cell Genesys, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.



                                                  /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
March 30, 1999
---

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

GREAT BASIN GOLD LTD. 
  (the "Company")

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  each of the undersigned officers of the Company, do hereby certify, to such
  officer’s knowledge, that:

| | • | the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
        year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | • | the information contained in the Form
        20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.                                      

|Date: June 24, 2005                  | Date: June 24, 2005                             
|------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------
|                                     |                                                 
|                                     |                                                 
|                                     |                                                 
|/s/ Ronald W. Thiessen               | /s/ Jeffrey R. Mason                            
|                                     |                                                 
|Ronald W. Thiessen                   | Jeffrey R. Mason                                
|Director and Chief Executive Officer | Director, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary

---



---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00626-CR

Mark Anthony GUAJARDO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7064

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED December 9, 2015.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice
EXHIBIT 21

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The Companys subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:



|(1) | Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Sypris Electronics, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Sypris Data Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Sypris Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------



|(5) | Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



|(6) | Sypris Technologies Kenton, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------



|(7) | Sypris Technologies Mexican Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(8) | Sypris Technologies Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican limited liability company.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(9) | Sypris Technologies Toluca, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30256 Summary Calendar

PHILLIS CONE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

DG LOUISIANA, L.L.C., incorrectly captioned Dollar General Corporation,

Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:18

- CV

- 1247

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *

Phillis Cone brought this action against Dollar General for injuries

allegedly sustained during a slip

- and

- fall in the potato chip aisle at a Dollar

General store in Bush, Louisiana. The district court granted summary

judgment for Dollar General and Cone appealed. We affirm for essentially the

reasons stated by the district court.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this o pinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 12, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30256 Document: 00515115385 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2019
DATE: APRIL 30, 2014

TO: DOCKET NO. EERE-2011-BT-TP-0024

FROM: MICHAEL KIDO (GC-71)

RE: EX PARTE SUBMISSION FROM BALLY REFRIGERATED BOXES, 

INC.

After the close of the comment period, an ex parte submission from Bally Refrigerated 

Boxes, Inc. was submitted to the Department of Energy (DOE) on April 28, 2014. That 

submission is available for viewing at http://www.energy.gov/gc/services/opengovernment/ex-parte-communications.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,880,391
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,952
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,080,683
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,559,023
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 16,626,251
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         711,293
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           722,548
<LOANS>                                     80,274,664
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,304,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             116,320,883
<DEPOSITS>                                  77,916,276
<SHORT-TERM>                                12,885,041
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,462,529
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,591,221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     99,647
<COMMON>                                     3,237,881
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,128,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             116,320,883
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,944,504
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              262,680
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                93,810
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,300,995
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             630,461
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             980,116
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,320,878
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  202,769
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              22,987
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,492,957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                762,266
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     517,628
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   517,628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.36
<LOANS-NON>                                    516,646
<LOANS-PAST>                                   520,981
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   727
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,325,906
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  318,240
<RECOVERIES>                                    93,852
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,304,286
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,304,286
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### E. B. ELLIOTT ADVERTISING CO. v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY.

No. 37995.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Rehearing Denied March 6, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 214 So.2d 511.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-191-CR

RONALD SHORTY	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Ronald Shorty pleaded guilty to sexual assault pursuant to a plea bargain agreement.  On January 5, 2009, the trial court placed him on five years’ deferred adjudication community supervision.  The State filed a petition to proceed to adjudication on March 12, 2009, alleging that Shorty had violated two conditions of his community supervision.  Shorty’s court-appointed trial counsel filed a motion for competency exam, and the trial court appointed Dr. Barry Norman to conduct the exam.  Dr. Norman concluded that Shorty was competent to stand trial.  Shorty pleaded “true” to the allegations in the State’s petition to proceed to adjudication.  The State waived one allegation in its petition.  The trial court found that the second allegation in the State’s petition was true, adjudicated Shorty guilty, and sentenced him to nine years’ confinement.  

	Shorty’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion.  In the brief, counsel averred that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous.  Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no reversible grounds on appeal and referencing any grounds that might arguably support the appeal.  See Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.).  This court afforded Shorty the opportunity to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did not do so.

	 Once an appellant’s court-appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays, 904 S.W.2d at 922–23.  Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988).

	We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the record.   We agree with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

								SUE WALKER

								JUSTICE

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: January 14, 2010
#### Glenn MILLER, a minor, by and through his father and next friend, Walter B. Miller, and Walter B. Miller, Individually, Appellants, v. M. W. MEADOR, M.D., et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1426.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice to Close Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel; Multicenter Clinical Grants.
    Date: June 6, 2018.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Tamizchelvi Thyagarajan, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, National Institute of Nursing Research, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-0343, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#baeedbd7d3c0d9d2dfd6ccd394ced2dbdddbc8dbd0dbd4fad4d3d294ddd5cc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bce8ddd1d5c6dfd4d9d0cad592c8d4dddbddceddd6ddd2fcd2d5d492dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 1, 2018.
Sylvia L. Neal,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-12178 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.01
                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Pacult, chief executive office and chief financial officer of
Ashley Capital Management, Inc., the General Partner of Atlas Futures Fund,
LP (the "Fund" or the "Registrant"), do hereby certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Fund;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  (a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

  (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

  (c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

  (a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

  (b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
     Michael Pacult


Date:	March 30, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,332
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         358,315
<DEPRECIATION>                                 165,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,209
<OTHER-SE>                                         487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,386
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,645
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,062
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,062
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,062
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.31


</TABLE>
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: ORDER AMENDING RULE S 528 AND 535 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE : : : : : : : : : : : : NO. 457

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

**ORDER PER CURIA** **M AN**  **D NOW**  , this 8th day of December, 201 4 , upon the recommendation of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee ; the proposal having been published before adoption at 42 Pa.B. 6252 (October 6, 2012) and 44 Pa.B. 778 ( February 8 , 201 4 ) **,** in the Atlantic Reporter (Third Series Advance Sheets, Vol. 81 ), and a Final Report to be published with this **ORDER :**  **IT IS**  **ORDERED** pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that the amendments to Pennsylvania Rule s of Criminal Procedure 528 and 535 are adopted in the attached form. This **ORDER** shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall be effective February 9 , 201 5

. Additions to the rules are shown in bold and are underlined. Deletions from the rules are shown in bold and brackets.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7760 

To make a supplemental appropriation for the COVID–19 Telehealth Program 

of the Federal Communications Commission for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2020. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2020 

Ms. SPANBERGER (for herself, Mr. JOHNSON of South Dakota, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. WELCH, and Mr. COX of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To make a supplemental appropriation for the COVID–19 

Telehealth Program of the Federal Communications 

Commission for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2020. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATION FOR COVID– 

4 19 TELEHEALTH PROGRAM. 

5 (a) APPROPRIATION.—There is appropriated, out of 

6 any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7760 IH

1 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020, for an ad2 ditional amount for ‘‘Federal Communications Commis3 sion—Salaries and Expenses’’, $200,000,000, to remain 

4 available until expended, to carry out the COVID–19 Tele5 health Program established in the Report and Order in 

6 the matter of COVID–19 Telehealth Program that was 

7 adopted by the Federal Communications Commission on 

8 March 31, 2020 (FCC 20–44). 

9 (b) EMERGENCY DESIGNATION.—The amount appro10 priated by subsection (a) is designated by the Congress 

11 as being for an emergency requirement pursuant to sec12 tion 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced Budget and Emer13 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 and shall be available 

14 only if the President subsequently so designates such 

15 amount and transmits such designation to the Congress. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EMCI 2013.12.31 EX 10.2.2






EXHIBIT 10.2.2


    


Compensation paid to all non-employee directors of EMC Insurance Group Inc. (the “Board”) during calendar year 2013 was as follows:


		
	•
	An annual fee of $32,000, irrespective of attendance at meetings;




		
	•
	An annual fee of $10,000 to the Chair of the Board; 




		
	•
	An annual fee of $4,000 to the chair of each Board committee which elected a chair; however, the annual fee to the chair of the Audit Committee was $10,000;




		
	•
	A fee of $2,000 and reimbursement of travel and business expenses for each Board meeting at which the director was in attendance;




		
	•
	A fee of $2,000 and reimbursement of travel and business expenses for each Board committee meeting that the director was in attendance; however, the chair of each Board committee received an additional $1,000 for each committee meeting at which such director served as chair;




Each Board member was also entitled to $2,000 per day and reimbursement of business expenses for each educational program or seminar attended to assist such Board member in effectively carrying out his or her responsibilities as a director of the Company.  In the case of “webinars” and similar computer based educational programs, each Board member received a $250 fee unless such webinar exceeded two hours in length, in which case the Board member was entitled to $2,000.



176