p. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 88 ) ll-C-3 0 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/20089:50:55AM

Sheet 88of 276P. 2

II-C-3 0

NOTE : A signe d cop y o f thi s ite m wa s no tavailable . 

# EOxi i If

' i

i u •" M A5 H 0 ^M- > / . ! '„'-LL::

. __ J

# • PJ L



### JU L 2 1 198

9 Mr . w . L . Frase r_^——~-~"T^r ' Senio rVice-Presiden tt• ^''"(JCTR1 \ \^ | \ \ ' ' TranaAlt aResource s Investmen tCorporatio n IsjyLi^----''"'*' " 11 0 12t h Avenu e S.W . -J 1
. Bo x 190 0 ; ; i iijt f \ } \?W V ' Calgary , Albert aT2 P2M 1 , - | v * ^

- _—.— - 

### Dea rMr . Fraaer tc~ A A'^.P . I a arespondin g t o you rlette ro f Ma y 10 , 1969 , t o Mr. Valda s V . Adaaku s regardin g aClea n Coa l Technolog y demonstratio n projec tand you rreques tfo ra n assuranc e fro a EP A no tt o enforc e ne

w sourc e requirement s tha taa y appl y durin g o rafte rth e project . EP A ous tevaluat e th e merit s o f thi s projec tt o determin e i f a"h o action * assuranc e woul d b a appropriate . T o sak e thi s evaluation * EP A need s th e followin g information ! A . Description o f the facility
. (1 ) Bane * Location
. (2 ) Typ e o f industry
. Size
. (3 ) Curren t controls . (4 ) Emission s i n kilogram s pe rhou rbefore * durin g an d afte r th e temporar y DO

E CC T o rsimila rBEA-fuade d project . Emission s shoul d b e aaasursd/calculata d usin g representativ e operatin g condition s (generall y maximu m capacity ) an d usin g th e sam

e operatin g parameters * before , durin g an d after . (5 ) Curran tannua l emission s (mos trecen ttwo year s o raor e representativ e period)-i n ton s pe ryear . / (6 ) Potentia l omission s i n ton s pa ryea r(maximu m physica l o r operationa l desig n capacity , a s limite d by an y federall y enforceabl e emission s limitations ) before * durin g an d afte r th e project .P. 4

- 2 - B . Descriptio n o f

th e project . (1 ) Typ

e o f temporar

y DO E CC T o rsimila rEPA-ftside d projec t (i.e. , improve

d baghouse , improve d low-£O x burners , etc. ) (2 ) Descriptio n o f contro l mechanism. (3 ) Projecte d emissio n reductio n efficiency . (4 ) Projected.cos teffectivenes s o f controls . (5 ) Innovativ e features , includin g histor y o f thi s avenue o

f research . (6 ) Profil e o

f emission s increases/decrease s durin g th e project . (7 ) Non-ai rqualit y environmenta l affects , i.e. * aore soli d waste * etc . (3 ) Duratio n o

f project . (9 ) Schedul e wit h ke y dates * i.e. , contract * purchase * installation * start-up , tea tdates* , dismantling , completion . (10 ) Projec tco-sponsor s an d monetar

y contribution s o

f each . (11 ) An y physical/operationa l change * t o b e mad e a tth e facilit y i n conjunctio n with an d durin g th e temporary 00 B CC T o r simila rEPA-funde

d project * alon g wit h a n explanatio n o

f Wh y thes e change s ar e necessar y t o th e project . (12 ) Cos to

f physical/operationa l changes . C . Other, inforaatlon . (1 ) Potentia l sarke tfo rth e temporar y DO B CC T o rsimila r EPA-funde

d project . ...'".-••-.•'..•/-.___^.'. n. " (2 ) Applicabl e SI

P limits , federall y enforceable'perai t conditions , pendin g SI P o renforcemen tactions * (3 ) Assurance s tha tfederall y enforceabl e perai tconditions * SI P limits * UtAQ

S an d PS D increment s wil l b e complie d with . I f

th e projec twoul

d caus e actua l amissio n increases * modellin g dat a oust , b e su b ai tte d t o demonstrat e ther e wil l b e n

o violation s o

f th e BAAQ

S o rPS D increments . Pleas e contac trn zc 39i-*"0 7 o rMyr a Cypse ro f a y staf f a t382-287 2 i f

yo u hfcvr * crtssanfct

} c rquestions * v Sincerely , '„"••• •
John S . Seitz , Directo r Stationar y Sourc e Complianc e Divisio n Offic e o

f Ai rQualit y Plannin g an d Standard s