alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

CASE NAME 

Ardagh Group S.A., et al. 

FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

009356 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in 

proceeding the appearance of 

D counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) 

D counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1:81 counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding, 

Melinda Levitt (Esq ) 

mlevitt@foley.com 

Foley & Lardner, LLP 

3000 K Street NW. 

Suite 600 

Washington, DC 20007 

Phone Number: 202-672-5356 

Fax Number: 202-672-5300 

John Landis (Esq.) 

j landis@foley.com 

Foley & Lardner, LLP 

321 North Clark Street 

Suite 2800 

Chicago, IL 60654 

Phone Number: 312-832-4500 

Fax Number: 312-832-4700 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 

(Melinda Levitt) 

2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being fi led. 

Beam, Inc. do 

Foley & Lardner, LLP 

510 Lake Cook Road 

Deerfield, IL 60015 

Phone Number 847-948-8888 

5. DATE SIGNED 

12/9/2013 

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7342

JEROME JULIUS BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND; PETER FRANCHOT, Comptroller,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-01881-ELH)

Submitted: February 4, 2013 Decided: February 8, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. State 

Comptroller of Md., No. 1:12-cv-01881-ELH (D. Md. filed June 28, 

2012; entered June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-75780)  pertaining to the registration of 6,222,487 shares of common
stock of Adept Technology,  Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-71374,  333-66993, 333-92525, 333-39065, 333-50292 and 333-50296) pertaining
to the 2001 Stock Plan, 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1993 Stock Plan, 1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan of Adept  Technology,
Inc. of our report dated July 29,  2002,  except Note 13 as to which the date is
January 22, 2003,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Adept  Technology,  Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A)
for the year ended June 30, 2002.



                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
February 5, 2003
federal trade commission

601 new jersey ave, nw

washington, dc

agenda

wednesday, april 30, 2008

9:00am Welcoming Remarks: James Kohm, Associate Director, 

Division of Enforcement, FTC

9:10am Opening Remarks: William E. Kovacic, Chairman, FTC

9:25am Session 1: Opening the Package — Overview of Trends in Packaging 

Claims

 Panelists:

• John Kalkowski, Packaging Digest

• Amy Zettlemoyer-Lazar, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

• Michelle Harvey, Environmental Defense Fund

• David Mallen, National Advertising Division, CBBB

 Moderator: Robert Kaye, Assistant Director, Division of Enforcement, FTC

10:25am Break

10:40am Session 2: Parceling Out the Green Guides — Do They Need 

Rewrapping? 

 Panelists:

• Kate Krebs, National Recycling Coalition

• Sara Hartwell, Environmental Protection Agency

• Steve Mojo, Biodegradable Products Institute

 Moderator: Janice Frankle, Division of Enforcement, FTC

11:45pm Lunch

green packaging claims
federal trade commission

601 new jersey ave, nw

washington, dc

1:00pm Session 3: Unpacking the New Green Claims — Should They Be 

Covered?

 Panelists:

• Kelly Tullier, Grocery Manufacturers Association

• Kathy Abusow, Sustainable Forestry Initiative

• Anne Johnson, Sustainable Packaging Coalition

• Brenda Platt, Institute for Local Self-Reliance

 Moderator: Laura Koss, Division of Enforcement, FTC

2:00pm Break

2:15pm Session 4: Substantiating Green Packaging Claims — Life Cycle 

Analysis, Third-Party Certification, Logos and Seals

 Panelists:

• Susan Selke, Michigan State University

• Cheryl Baldwin, Green Seal

• Urvashi Rangan, Consumers Union

• John Delfausse, Estée Lauder Companies

 Moderator: Anne McCormick, Division of Enforcement, FTC

3:15pm Break

3:25pm Wrapping it Up: Roundtable on Consumer Protection Challenges 

and the Need for FTC Guidance

 Panelists: 

• Victor Bell, Environmental Packaging International

• Scot Case, TerraChoice

• Joseph Cattaneo, Glass Packaging Institute

• Keith Christman, American Chemistry Council

• Snehal Desai, NatureWorks LLC

• David Duncan, Unilever

• Jim Hanna, Starbucks Coffee Company

• Cassie Phillips, Weyerhaeuser Company

 Moderator: James Kohm, Associate Director, Division of Enforcement, FTC

4:55pm Brief Closing Remarks: James Kohm, Associate Director, 

Division of Enforcement, FTC
#### In the INTEREST of J. V., a child.

No. 71-870.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 30, 1972.

Appeal from Juvenile Court, Orange County; J. C. Kerr, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 and

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



The Undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Federal-Mogul Corporation (the Company) filed with the SEC on the
date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written
statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: October 28, 2005



By:

/s/ José Maria AlapontJosé Maria AlapontChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ G. Michael LynchG. Michael LynchChief Financial Officer




66
DISMISS; Opinion Filed April 4, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01321

- CV

BRUCE AND JANET HEND RICK , Appellants
V.
JEREMIAH AND JEFFREY WHOLEY , Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06322

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang, and Evans

The Court has before it appellants’ March 15, 2013 unopposed motion to dismiss

i nterlocutory appeal. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM

121321F.P05– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRUCE AND JANET HENDRICK, Appellants

No. 05

- 12

- 01321

- CV V.

JEREMIAH AND JEFFREY WHOLEY, Appellees On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06322. Opinion delivered per curiam before Justices Lang, Francis, and Evans.

In accordance with this Court’s op inion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee JEREMIAH AND JEFFREY WHOLEY recover their costs of this appeal from appellant BRUCE AND JANET HENDRICK, unless the parties’ agreement provides otherwise.

Judgment entered this 4th day of April, 2013.

/Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE
#### Patricia S. SPOHRER and Central Bank and Trust Company, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of C. N. Shelton, Deceased, Petitioners, v. Constance Shelton ELLIOTT, Individually and as Trustee, et al., Respondents.

No. 44713.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 26, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       5,038,540
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          16,501
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               296,490
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               199,184
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  9,723,758
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       4,316,523
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         4,426,282
<LOANS>                                     65,412,683
<ALLOWANCE>                                    915,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              88,353,313
<DEPOSITS>                                  66,291,688
<SHORT-TERM>                                 9,578,829
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,803,438
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,677,205
<COMMON>                                     2,052,948
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    249,853
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,699,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              88,353,313
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,492,750
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              720,411
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                49,778
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,262,939
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,714,749
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,211,464
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,051,475
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  291,608
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              19,865
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,706,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,432,493
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     941,017
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   941,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.34
<LOANS-NON>                                    356,639
<LOANS-PAST>                                   212,301
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,818
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               897,180
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  410,445
<RECOVERIES>                                   140,998
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              915,453
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           664,719
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        250,734
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1








April 17, 2017Analyst Contact:Megan Patterson918-561-5325Media Contact:Stephanie Higgins918-591-5026





ONEOK and ONEOK Partners First-quarter 2017


Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





TULSA, Okla. – April 17, 2017 – ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will release their first-quarter 2017 earnings after the market closes on May 2, 2017.





ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ executive management will participate in a joint conference call the following day at 11 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (10 a.m. Central Daylight Time) on May 3, 2017. The call also will be carried live on ONEOK’s and ONEOK Partners’ websites.





To participate in the telephone conference call, dial 800-210-9006, pass code 6861498, or log on to www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





|      |                                                                                 
|----- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|What: | ONEOK and ONEOK Partners first-quarter 2017 earnings conference call and webcast




|      |                             
|----- | ----------------------------
|When: | 11 a.m. Eastern, May 3, 2017

10 a.m. Central





|       |                                                               
|------ | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Where: | 1) Phone conference call: dial 800-210-9006, pass code 6861498

2) Log on to the webcast at www.oneok.com


3) Log on to the webcast at www.oneokpartners.com





If you are unable to participate in the conference call or the webcast, the replay will be available on ONEOK’s website, www.oneok.com , and ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com , for 30 days.  A recording will be available by phone for seven days.  The playback call may be accessed at 888-203-1112, pass code 6861498.








ONEOK, Inc. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKE) is the general partner and as of Dec. 31, 2016, owns 41.2 percent of ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS), one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, which owns one of the nation's premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent, Permian and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers and is a leader in the gathering,





-more-


---






ONEOK and ONEOK Partners First-quarter 2017


Conference Call and Webcast Scheduled





Page 2





processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. ONEOK is a FORTUNE 500 company and is included in Standard & Poor's (S&P) 500 index.





For more information, visit the websites at www.oneok.com or www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK and ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKNews and @ONEOKPartners .





###
#### James Wesley ROSS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-79.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 5, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

Appellant was informed against for the crime of kidnapping and robbery. He was tried by jury and found guilty on both counts. During the course of his trial a psychiatrist testified to the effect that ap*41pellant’s ability to determine right from wrong was blunted at the time these acts were committed. Appellant asserts this diagnosis was not rebutted by the State.

It is true from the record that the psychiatrist testified to that effect; however, it is within the province of the jury or the trier of fact to determine the defendant’s sanity at the time of the crime, based on proper expert testimony. Acree v. State, 1943, 153 Fla. 561, 15 So.2d 262; Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24. Since the jury found defendant guilty on both counts, they obviously did not believe the defendant to be incapable of knowing right from wrong.

For these reasons the judgment is affirmed.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
Exhibit 23.3





Source Energy Corp.


3555 Santoro Way, Suite A


San Diego, CA 92130


Phone (858) 259-2271


Fax     (858) 259-2273





March 18, 2010





Mr. Stephen Hosmer


Royale Energy Inc.


7676 Hazard Center Drive, Suite 150


San Diego, CA 92108





Dear Mr. Hosmer:





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-163184) on Form S-3 of Royale Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) of the reference to Source Energy Corp. and the inclusion of our report dated February 11, 2010 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, of the Company and its subsidiaries, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





We also consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.





Source Energy CorpBy:    /s/ James FrimodigTitle:    President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Jun-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                Jul-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                        $   299,048
<SECURITIES>                                  $         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 $ 2,201,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                  $    60,000
<INVENTORY>                                   $         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              $ 5,628,325
<PP&E>                                        $   817,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                $   743,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                $ 7,000,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $ 5,558,605
<BONDS>                                       $         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         $         0
<PREFERRED>                                   $         0
<COMMON>                                      $    10,817
<OTHER-SE>                                    $   871,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  $ 7,000,375
<SALES>                                       $ 3,310,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              $ 3,310,866
<CGS>                                         $ 2,494,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 $ 2,494,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $ 1,089,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              $         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $    58,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               $  (326,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  $         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $  (326,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                $         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               $         0
<CHANGES>                                     $         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $  (326,942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 $      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 $      (.03)
        


</TABLE>
#### AUTO-DRIVEAWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Mary C. SIMONTON, Appellee.

No. 73-430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 16, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,086,904
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         148,822
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                40,682
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     15,299,302
<ALLOWANCE>                                    252,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,168,624
<DEPOSITS>                                  18,184,634
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,556,800
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            279,190
<LONG-TERM>                                    392,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       605,630
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,150,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              22,168,624
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              1,030,260
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              216,825
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 7,433
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,254,518
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             489,795
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              87,444
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          677,279
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   69,797
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (860)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                636,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                259,995
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     172,915
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                     94,016
<LOANS-PAST>                                    33,793
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 7,052
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 32,275
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               241,182
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  105,645
<RECOVERIES>                                    47,473
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              252,707
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           252,807
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### NETTLES EXCAVATORS, INC., et al. v. CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORP. et al.

No. 61217.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Nettles Excavators, Inc., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of E. Baton Rouge. 351 So.2d 1258.

Denied.
#### Idella RADFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-283.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 17, 1972.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed. See Ross v. State, 254 So.2d 40 (Fla.App.1971).

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.