alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edna Sproull WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY, a body politic and corporate, Appellee.

No. N-124.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 27, 1971.

Jones, Foerster & Hodge, Jacksonville, and Culverhouse, Tomlinson, Taylor & De-Carion, Miami, for appellant.

James C. Rinaman, Jr., and Thomas D. Oakley, Jacksonville, for appellee.

SPECTOR, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a final judgment in condemnation vesting in appellee easements to realty belonging to appellant, and awarding compensation to the latter therefor. The purpose of this taking was the erection of the electric transmission lines by appellee.

The focal issue on appeal is the admissibility of appellant’s testimony relating to severance damages to her remaining property. This testimony consisted of describing sales of realty (adjacent to transmission lines) in Volusia and Orange Counties in order to demonstrate a probable decrease in the value of appellant’s property remaining after the taking. She urges that no similar sales in Duval County were found; and that the rule of law allowing consideration of comparable situations located some distance away therefore is applicable to authorize the admission of the foregoing testimony.

We agree with the lower court’s exclusion of the proffer, and we quote with approval his explanatory ruling thereon:

> “Transmission lines built on easements such as petitioner [appellee] seeks to condemn herein leaving a fee, leaving fee land on each side are not so unique as to allow the proffered testimony as to damages to the remainder of land * * * based on value of land located in counties approximately 100 and 200 miles, respectively, from Duval County; therefore, the Rochelle vs. State Road Department case found in 196 So.2d 477 [Fla.App.] would not apply because that case turned on the uniqueness of the interchange being sought to be built along the turnpike.”

It is clear that the unique nature of a turnpike interchange in Lake County, Florida, does not find its counterpart by analogy in realty adjoining or in the vicinity of an electric power transmission line in heav*653ily populated and industrialized Duval County.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

535 

KA 13-00309 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVID BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (CHRISTINE M. COOK OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Jeffrey R.

Merrill, A.J.), rendered November 13, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same memorandum as in People v Brown ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___

[June 10, 2016]).

Entered: June 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Fansteel Inc. as of June 30, 1998 and the related
consolidated statment of income for the six months ended June 30, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety be reference to the Company's Form 10Q filing for
the period ended June 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,778,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,892,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                   309,196
<INVENTORY>                                 21,854,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,954,874
<PP&E>                                      64,680,506
<DEPRECIATION>                              49,538,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,113,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,422,282
<BONDS>                                      2,126,685
<COMMON>                                    21,497,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,773,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,113,973
<SALES>                                     79,433,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,433,195
<CGS>                                       65,365,087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               74,417,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (313,055)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,328,785
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,979,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,349,785
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,349,785
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), Howard R. Levine, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Kenneth
T. Smith, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  April 8, 2009



|                                                                                |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Howard R. Levine                                                            |  | 
|Howard R. Levine                                                               
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





|                                                                              |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Kenneth T. Smith                                                          |  | 
|Kenneth T. Smith                                                             
|Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-30655, 333-74747,333-74715, 333-78521, 333-78567, 333-83725, 333-35806, 333-62502, 333-84010, 333-90986,333-91002 and 333-117334 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32221,333-60277, 333-70335, 333-85269, 333-92361, 333-32526, 333-40698, 333-47914, 333-67978,333-73274, 333-81170, and 333-84932 on Form S-3 of our reports dated June 8,2005, relating to the financial statements of THQ Inc., and management’s reporton the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. for the year ended March 31,2005.

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Los Angeles, CaliforniaJune 8, 2005

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          778453
<SECURITIES>                                    266411
<RECEIVABLES>                                   599837
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     612500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2532107
<PP&E>                                         2882363
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1406973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4942703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1225251
<BONDS>                                         218484
<COMMON>                                        188371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2903257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4942703
<SALES>                                          58726
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3289520
<CGS>                                            50382
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    50382
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3340970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (111850)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      7652
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (119502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (119502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### Jerome DRUCKER, Appellant, v. Lydia FERNANDEZ, Appellee.

No. 73-1278.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 15, 1974.

Palmer & Lazar, Miami, for appellant.

Carlos B. Fernandez, Miami, for appel-lee.

Before CARROLL, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order finding the court to have jurisdiction over the defendant in a paternity suit action.

Plaintiff attempted service of process upon the defendant, a member of the armed forces, by publication in a newspaper. The defendant moved to quash service of process on the grounds for lack of jurisdiction over the person. The court denied the motion and defendant appealed therefrom.

Jurisdiction to determine the question of paternity cannot be acquired in a paternity suit through constructive service by publication on the defendant. See F.S. § 49.-011, F.S.A. Cf. deMoya v. dePena, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 735; T.J.K. v. N.B., Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 592.

Accordingly, the order finding the court to have jurisdiction to determine paternity is reversed and this cause is remanded to the trial court for entry of an order consistent herewith.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Falcon Products,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David L. Morley, President and Chief Operating Officer (acting
Chief Financial Officer) of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2004                   /s/ David L. Morley
                                       -------------------
                                       David L. Morley
                                       President and Chief Operating Officer
                                           (acting Chief Financial Officer)
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

CASE NAME 

Ardagh Group S.A., et al. 

FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

009356 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission's Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in 

proceeding the appearance of 

D counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) 

D counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1:81 counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding, 

Neely Agin (Senior Counsel) 

neely.agin@nortonrosefulbright.com 

Fulbright & Jaworski LLP 

Suite 500 

801 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Phone Number: 202-662-4723 

Fax Number: 202-662-4643 

Layne Kruse (Partner) 

layne.kruse@nortonrosefulbright.com 

Fulbright & Jaworski LLP 

Fulbright Tower 

1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 

Houston, TX 77010 

Phone Number: 713-651-5194 

Fax Number: 713-651-5246 

Ryan Manns (Senior Associate) 

ryan.manns@nortonrosefulbright.com 

Fulbright & Jaworski LLP 

2200 Ross Avenue 

Suite 2800 

Dallas, TX 75201 

Phone Number: 214-855-8304 

Fax Number: 214-855-8200 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 

(Layne Kruse) 

2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being fi led. 

John Shaddox (President and Chief Executive Officer) 

jshaddox@vitro.com 

Vitro Packaging, LLC 

5200 Tennyson Parkway 

Plano, TX 75024 

Phone Number: 469-443-1130 

5. DATE SIGNED 

12/5/2013 

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM bright
technologies.com, inc. BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         66
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    84
<PP&E>                                             234
<DEPRECIATION>                                     156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,355
<BONDS>                                             15
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,781)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       595
<SALES>                                             31
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    31
<CGS>                                               16
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       16
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    34
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (325)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (325)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OF REGISTRANT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30,
1996 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF REGISTRANT FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         792,000
<SECURITIES>                                21,762,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,427,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,811,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                 633,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,836,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,815,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,380,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,836,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,945,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,954,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   645,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,247,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,247,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7622 

To permit each State to have 3 statues on display in the United States 

Capitol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2020 

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To permit each State to have 3 statues on display in the 

United States Capitol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Share America’s Di5 verse History in the Capitol Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERMITTING STATES TO HAVE 3 STATUES ON DIS7 PLAY IN CAPITOL. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1814 of the Revised Stat9 utes of the United States (2 U.S.C. 2131) is amended by 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7622 IH

1 striking ‘‘not exceeding two in number’’ and inserting ‘‘not 

2 exceeding 3 in number’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT REGARDING PROCE4 DURES FOR REPLACEMENT OF STATUES.—Section 311(c) 

5 of the Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 2001 (2 

6 U.S.C. 2132(c)), is amended by striking ‘‘not more than 

7 two statues’’ and inserting ‘‘not more than 3 statues’’. 

8 SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING OPPORTUNITY 

9 FOR PLACEMENT OF STATUES OF WOMEN 

10 AND MINORITIES. 

11 It is the sense of Congress that, in light of the fact 

12 that statues of women and members of racial and ethnic 

13 minority groups are underrepresented in the United States 

14 Capitol, each State should use the opportunity provided 

15 by this Act to have an additional statue on display in the 

16 Capitol to furnish a statue depicting a woman or a mem17 ber of a racial or ethnic minority group who is a notable 

18 figure in the State’s history. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS