alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-40966 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee

v. STACEY LAVERAL WILLIAMS, also known as Black Magic, Also known as Magic, Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-87-1

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Stacey Laveral Williams challenges the 220-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to manufacture, distribute, or possess, with the intent to distribute, cocaine, cocaine base, and marijuana. In that regard, William s contests the three-level enhancement, pursuant to Sentencing Guideline § 3B1.1(b), for his r o l e a s a manager or supervisor in a U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June28 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40966 Document: 00511522622 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/28/2011No. 10-40966

criminal conspiracy. He m a intains there is no evidence showing that he exercised any supervisory authority or that he did anything other than act as a broker for two drug suppliers and buy and sell drugs. Extensive evidence was presented at th e sentencing hearing. A district court’s determination that a defendant was a manager or supervi s o r u n d er Guideline § 3B1.1(b) is reviewed for clear error. United States v. Rose , 449 F.3d 627, 633 (5th Cir. 2006). A finding of fact is not clearly e rr o n e o u s if it is plausible in the light of th e e ntire record. Id. For the reasons that follow, the district court did not clearly err in imposing the enhancement. The rec o rd reflects that Williams independently set his own price and arranged the details of the drug transactions. As evidenced in recorded telephone conversations, which were played for the district court, Wi l liams recruited, and attempted to recruit, individuals into th e operation. The organization’s scale was significant—it was responsible for drug distribution in four States. Additionally, there was evidence that Williams managed issues of quality control. He also contacte d a co-conspirator when a customer was arrested; he managed that situation and repeatedly sought to ensure that neither he nor his supplier would be found with drugs if the arrested customer lead law enforcement authorities to them. Further, Williams received a share of the fruits of the enterprise. See, e.g. , United States v. Lopez-Urbina , 434 F.3d 750, 766-67 (5th Cir. 2005). AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 10-40966 Document: 00511522622 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/28/2011
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 574 V

Filed: Octo ber 15 , 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

LINDA COTHERN

, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* T rivalent Influenza (Flu) Vaccine ;

* Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Administration; SIRVA

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell

, Chief Special Master:

On July 7 , 2014

, Linda Cothern filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

, 2 [ the

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Peti tioner alleged that s he suffered a shoulder i njury which

was caused by the influenza vaccine she received on September 26, 2013. Petit ion at

1

. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special

Masters.

On October 15 , 2014 , respondent filed her Rule 4(c) r eport [“Res

. R eport”] in

which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Res. Report

at 3 . Specifically, respondent indicates “ that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with

a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) and that it was caused in

fact by the flu vaccine she received on September 26, 2013. ” Id. Respondent agrees

that petitioner ’s injury lasted for more than six months and that no other causes for

petitioner ’ s injury can be identified. Id.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I inte nd to

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501

note (2006)) . In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitione r has 14 day s to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits withi n this definition, I will redact such

m aterial from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2006).2

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that

petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

s/Denise K. Vowe ll

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2,634,439
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       409,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                       2,384,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  5,604,617
<PP&E>                                            1,164,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                      533,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    8,142,945
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               656,901
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            247,968
<OTHER-SE>                                       19,231,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      8,142,945
<SALES>                                           2,335,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,436,881
<CGS>                                             1,006,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,006,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,801,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (371,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (371,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (371,194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 DOUGLAS G. BOWEN and MARY

3 I. BOWEN,

4 Plaintiffs-Appellees,

5 v. No. 31,613

6 R.R. PYLE and MARGARET PYLE, 

7 Defendants-Appellants,

8 and

9 CARLA CASTILLO, PAULA 

10 WILLIAMS, and LYNN SANCHEZ,

11 Defendants.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY

13 Sarah C. Backus, District Judge

14 Campbell & Wells, PA

15 John S. Campbell

16 Albuquerque, NM

17 for Appellees

18 R.R. Pyle

19 Margaret Pyle

20 Albuquerque, NM
2

1 Pro Se Appellants

2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

3 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

4 Defendants R.R. Pyle and Margaret Pyle (“Appellants”) appeal pro se from an

5 order granting summary judgment to Plaintiffs on Plaintiffs’ claim to quiet title and

6 for slander of title. [RP 182] We proposed to dismiss for lack of a sufficiently final

7 order in a notice of proposed summary disposition. Appellants have filed a

8 memorandum in opposition, and Plaintiffs have filed a memorandum in support of our

9 proposed summary disposition.

10 After reviewing Appellants’ memorandum, which fails to address our concerns

11 as to finality, we are unconvinced that our proposed disposition is in error. Therefore,

12 for the reasons set forth in our notice of proposed summary dismissal, we dismiss

13 Appellants’ appeal for lack of a sufficiently final order. See NMSA 1978, § 39-3-2

14 (1966); Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. Kapnison, 113 N.M. 231, 234-40, 824 P.2d 1033,

15 1036-42 (1992).

16 IT IS SO ORDERED.

17 
3

1 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

2 WE CONCUR:

3 

4 CELIA FOY CASTILLO, Chief Judge

5 

6 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7368 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7368

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the process by which 
   a member of the Armed Forces may be referred for a mental health 
                              evaluation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2020

 Mr. Moulton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the process by which 
   a member of the Armed Forces may be referred for a mental health 
                              evaluation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brandon Act''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY REFERRAL FOR MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATION.

    Section 1090a of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(e) Process Applicable to Member Disclosure.--The regulations 
required by subsection (a) shall--
            ``(1) establish a phrase that enables a member of the armed 
        forces to trigger a referral of the member by a commanding 
        officer or supervisor for a mental health evaluation;
            ``(2) require a commanding officer or supervisor to make 
        such referral as soon as practicable following disclosure by 
        the member to the commanding officer or supervisor of the 
        phrase established under paragraph (1); and
            ``(3) ensure that the process protects the confidentiality 
        of the member in a manner similar to the confidentiality 
        provided for members making restricted reports under section 
        1565b(b) of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                               6,177,000
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       19,332,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           438,000
<INVENTORY>                                         10,557,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    38,410,000
<PP&E>                                              56,073,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                      38,950,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      59,403,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               15,406,000
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               889,000
<OTHER-SE>                                          38,558,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        59,403,000
<SALES>                                             87,353,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    87,353,000
<CGS>                                               64,912,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       64,912,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    13,980,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      60,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8,401,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,072,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5,329,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,329,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                              .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              .68


</TABLE>
#### Shirley L. TAXAY, Appellant, v. Emil P. TAXAY, Appellee.

No. 73-406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 17, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 November 5, 2010

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



<PAGE>

Item 2.02   Results of Operations and Financial Condition
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Registrant has reported its results of operations for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2010, as described in Registrant's press release dated
November 5, 2010, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Exhibit No.   Document
-----------   --------

99.1          Press release issued by the Registrant dated November 5, 2010.



                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: November 5, 2010                 	    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-36754 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8, in Registration Statement No.
33-52506 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8, in Registration Statement No.
33-62098 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8, in Registration Statement No.
33-58637 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8, in Registration Statement No.
33-58639 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8, in Registration Statement No.
33-36713 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No.
33-58017 of BJ Services Company on Form S-4 of our report dated November 24,
1997 (December 15, 1997 as to Notes 6 and 14) appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of BJ Services Company for the year ended September 30, 1997.
 
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
 
Houston, Texas
December 19, 1997
EXHIBIT 11

FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.  STATEMENT RE COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

|                                                                                                                                  |  | QUARTER ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 2002 |         | QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 1, 2001 |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------- | ------------------------------ | -
|
|
|AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                                                                                                        |  |                                 | 173,077 |                                |  
|NET INCOME                                                                                                                        |  | $                               | 57,478  |                                | $
|NET INCOME PER SHARE                                                                                                              |  | $                               | 0.33    |                                | $
|PRO FORMA DILUTION IMPACT OF COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS                                                                             |  |                                 |         |                                |  
|ADDITIONAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES FROM ASSUMED EXERCISE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR OF DILUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS                   |  |                                 |         |                                |  
|WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES ASSUMED REPURCHASED FROM ASSUMED PROCEEDS OF EXERCISES USING TREASURY STOCK METHOD (AVERAGE MARKET PRICE) |  |                                 |         |                                |  
|                                                                                                                                  |  |                                 |         |                                |  
|NET PRO FORMA COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES                                                                          |  |                                 |         |                                |  
|PERCENTAGE DILUTION FROM PRO FORMA COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES                                                     |  |                                 |         |                                |  
|TOTAL COMMON STOCK AND COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS                                                                                   |  |                                 |         |                                |  
|NET INCOME                                                                                                                        |  |                                 |         |                                | $
|PRO FORMA NET INCOME PER SHARE (INCLUDING DILUTIVE COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS)                                                      |  |                                 |         |                                | $

---

QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION In connection with the Annual Report of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. (the Company) for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 8, 2005 /s/ Jerry MoyesJerry MoyesChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ William F. Riley IIIWilliam F. Riley IIIChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### LOUISIANA RESOURCES CO. v. Matilda Gray STREAM.

No. 61205.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Matilda Gray Stream, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Cameron. 351 So.2d 517.

Writ granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.