alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned Vlado P. Hreljanovic,
Chief Executive Officer of the registrant Juniper Group, Inc. hereby certifies
that:





1. The
Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      April 15,  2010
            By:
            /s/Vlado P.
      HreljanovicVlado
      P. Hreljanovic, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Jerome SANGERMAN, Appellant, v. CHARRON-WILLIAMS SYSTEMS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-614.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 July 22, 2004

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 5.     Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          The following exhibit is included with this Report:

          Exhibit 99.1   Press release, dated July 22, 2004, announcing
                         the sale of 60,000 shares of DHIL common stock
                         at a price of $7.00 per share in a private
			 placement.


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: July 26, 2004                         By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
#### Malinda J. Jones, *et al.,*Appellants, *vs.*R. A. Snodgrass, Respondent.

1. *Attachment*— Plea *in abatement*— Appeal *will not lie from.*— Under the present statute, (Wagn. Stat,, 189-90, $ 42,) an appeal will not lie from a judgment on a plea in abatement. [Davis vs. Perry, 46 Mo., 449.]

*Appeal from Moniteau Circuit Court.*

*Edmund Burke,*for Appellants.

*Owens & Woods,*for Respondent.

*598"Wagner, Judge,

delivered, the opinion of the court.

The plaintiffs instituted a suit by attachment under the Landlord and Tenant Act, and the defendant filed in the cause a plea in the nature of a plea in abatement. The issues being made up and tried, on this plea they were found for the defendant and judgment was rendered thereon. From this j udgment the plaintiffs appealed.

Under our present statute, a judgment on a plea in abatement for the defendants, does not abate the suit, but it still continues as in an ordinary action, (1 Wagn. Stat., p. 189, § 42,) and proceedings by attachment under the Landlord and Tenant Act, are conducted in the same manner as provided by law, in cases of suits by attachment, (2 Wagn. Stat., p. 882, § 27,) as the cause still subsists in court and is not finally determined. It is plain, therefore, that an appeal will not lie from the judgment upon a plea in abatement. (Davis vs. Perry, 46 Mo., 449.)

The result is, that the appeal must be dismissed.

The other judges concur.
#### Zane CLARK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-280.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 20, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; Tom Waddell, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         11,001
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         8,748
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         120,051
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           118,902
<LOANS>                                        317,012
<ALLOWANCE>                                    5,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,751
<DEPOSITS>                                     361,764
<SHORT-TERM>                                   9,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,756
<LONG-TERM>                                    74,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6,362
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,869
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 475,751
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                24,892
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              7,109
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,209
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               33,210
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             14,523
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,052
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          15,158
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1,144
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                9,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,184
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     4,603
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,603
<EPS-BASIC>                                  6.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  6.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.37
<LOANS-NON>                                    836
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                2,200
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               4,649
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  626
<RECOVERIES>                                   279
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              5,446
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           5,446
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
   
 
 November 30, 2010

Analyst Contact:
Andrew Ziola918-588-7163Media Contact:
Brad Borror918-588-7582
   ONEOK Partners to Participate in
 Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Energy Symposium
  TULSA, Okla. -Nov. 30, 2010 -- ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in the 9thAnnual Wells Fargo Pipeline, MLP and Energy Symposium in New York City on Dec. 7-8, 2010.
  John W. Gibson, ONEOK Partners chairman, president and chief executive officer, will present on Dec. 7 at 8:50 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7:50 a.m. Central Standard Time).
  The conference will be webcast and will be accessible on ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com. A replay of the webcast will be archived for 30 days. The company will also post the presentation on its website that morning, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Standard Time (7 a.m. Central Standard Time).
 
 ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships, and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers. Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a diversified energy company, which owns 42.8 percent of the overall partnership interest. ONEOK is one of the largest natural gas distributors in the United States, and its energy services operation focuses primarily on marketing natural gas and related services throughout the U.S.
  For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com. OKS-FV OKE-FV
  # # #
Fw: oops, my mistake...

Jan King to: Sherry Russell 07/12/2011 03:54 PM

Jan King

Regulatory Development and Policy Analysis Group

phone: (919) 541-5665

fax: (919) 541-2664

Mailcode: C404-05

----- Forwarded by Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/12/2011 03:54 PM -----

From: "Laity, Jim" <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>

To: "Laity, Jim" <James_A._Laity@omb.eop.gov>, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, 

Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Hannon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lea 

Anderson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet McCabe/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ginger 

Tennant/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Randy Waite/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rich 

Scheffe/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/12/2011 03:07 PM

Subject: oops, my mistake...

Just read your detailed response on Set 1. I totally missed that the first 

sentence already says you are retaining the current secondary standards. 

Please accept my apologies...trying to do this too quickly!!

Everything looks good to me, but I need to wait for internal clearance before 

you upload. I will let you know as soon as we're ready.

-- jim

-----Original Message-----

From: Laity, Jim 

Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 3:03 PM

To: 'Lydia Wegman'; Mancini, Dominic J.

Cc: Karen Martin; John Hannon; Lea Anderson; Janet McCabe; Ginger Tennant; 

Randy Waite; Rich Scheffe; Jan King

Subject: RE: Our response to your first set of comments

Set 2 looks fine. I don't understand why you are reluctant to say explicitly 

up front that you are retaining the current secondary standard to protect 

against direct exposure to gaseous NOx/SOx. This is key info for the public 

and several folks who read this were initially confused. What's the big deal 

here. Am I missing something?

Please call... 202-395-5168

-----Original Message-----

From: Lydia Wegman [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 2:12 PM

To: Laity, Jim; Mancini, Dominic J.

Cc: Karen Martin; John Hannon; Lea Anderson; Janet McCabe; Ginger Tennant; 

Randy Waite; Rich Scheffe; Jan King

Subject: Our response to your first set of comments
Jim, and Dom,

Attached is our response to your comments on page one of the notice in the 

first set of comments. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you 

are in agreement with these edits. Thanks.

Lydia

(See attached file: NOxSOx 7-12-11 set 1 comments 7-12-11 response.docx)
#### William Davis BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 14, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4820]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES


Designation of Agent To Receive Child Support and Alimony Orders 
and Process Pursuant to Sec. 362 of Pub. L. 104-193

AGENCY: U.S. House of Representatives.

ACTION: Notice: Designation of Agent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 
Reconciliation Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-193, Sec. 362), the United 
States House of Representatives designates the Office of General 
Counsel for the House to receive orders and accept service of process 
in matters relating to child support or alimony.

ADDRESSES: Such orders and process shall be directed to: Office of 
General Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives, 219 Cannon Building, 
Washington, DC 20515, (202) 225-9700.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. Sec. 659, as amended by Sec. 362, Pub. L. 
104-193, 110 Stat. 2105.

    Dated: February 21, 1997.
Robin H. Carle,
Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives.
[FR Doc. 97-4820 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0000-00-0
#### TAMPA TRANSIT LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. Gladys H. DARLING, Respondent.

No. 44695.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 28, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Clyde E. HART, Petitioner, v. Raymon F. TUCKER and Willard J. Grande, Respondents.

No. 40222.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 7, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 237 So.2d 772.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
ZECAANDE COMME
an BON
eS ecewenrossments CP\
. dee 26 AY

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
a foreign corporation,

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY,
a corporation, and

DOCKET NO. 9300

PITT-DES MOINES, INC.,
a corporation.

NN ee

ORDER ON RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR
DIRECTED VERDICT ON THE ISSUE OF REMEDY

L

On January 13, 2003, Respondents filed their Motion for Directed Verdict on the Issue of
Remedy. Complaint Counsel filed its opposition to Respondents’ motion on January 23, 2003.
On January 24, 2003, Respondents filed a motion for leave to file a reply to Complaint Counsel’s
opposition. Complaint Counsel filed an opposition to the motion for leave to file a reply on
January 28, 2003. The motion for leave to file a reply is DENIED. For reasons set forth below,
the motion for directed verdict is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

I.

Respondents seek a directed verdict on the issue of remedy. Respondents assert that
because Complaint Counsel has completed its presentation of evidence and because Complaint
Counsel did not present evidence regarding the practicality, desirability or effectiveness of
Complaint Counsel’s proposed remedy, directed verdict is appropriate pursuant to Rule 3.22(e) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice.

Rule 3.22(e) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice sets forth: “[w]hen a motion to
dismiss is made at the close of the evidence offered in support of the complaint based upon an
alleged failure to establish a prima facie case, the Administrative Law Judge may defer ruling
thereon until immediately after all evidence has been received and the hearing record is closed.”
16 CFR. § 3.22().



Complaint Counsel’s opposition asserts that a motion for directed verdict makes little
sense in an administrative proceeding where there is no jury. Complaint Counsel further asserts
that divestiture is required if a violation of Clayton Act § 7 is found.

i.

The trial of this matter concluded on January 16, 2003. The record was closed on January
28, 2003. Post trial briefing has been scheduled. Commission Rule 3.22(e) authorizes the filing
of a motion to dismiss at the close of the government’s case. However, Respondents’ motion
raises substantive issues that, at this point in the proceedings, are better addressed after a
thorough review of the record and full briefing on all the legal issues raised by the violations
alleged in the Complaint and any defenses thereto. Accordingly, the motion is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The issues raised by this motion and opposition may be incorporated
into the post trial briefs and will be addressed, as appropriate, in the Initial Decision.

ORDERED: Dyn 6 hopadl
D. Michael Chappell i.
Administrative Law Judge

Date: January 28, 2003
H. R. 7502 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 101 South 

16th Street in Clarinda, Iowa, as the ‘‘Jessie Field Shambaugh Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JESSIE FIELD SHAMBAUGH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 101 South 16th Street in Clarinda, Iowa, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Jessie Field Shambaugh Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Jessie Field Shambaugh Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>
 
                                 EXHIBIT 10.78



July 31, 1995


Dear James Keegan,

The purpose of this letter is to confirm the terms of your employement with
Trimark Holdings, Inc.

1.   TITLE: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

2.   TERM:  3 years.  From July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1998

3.   BASE SALARY:  A base salary of $152,000.00 effective from July 1, 1995,
     $165,000.00 effective July 1, 1996, and $177,500 effective July 1, 1997.

4.   BONUS:  You will be eligible to participate in the fiscal year end
     executive bonus pool per management discretion.

5.   RENEWAL:  You agree that for the period commencing 30 days prior to the
     conclusion of the of the above mentioned term, at Trimark's request, you
     will enter into exclusive negotiations regarding the renewal of this
     agreement.  If at the end of the above mentioned term you and Trimark are
     unable to reach an agreement regarding the renewal of your employment with
     Trimark, your employment with Trimark shall continue on a month to month
     basis at the same terms contained in this agreement unless terminated by
     Trimark or you upon 30 days prior written notice.

6.   You hereby expressly agree that while employed by Trimark Holdings you will
     not disclose any confidential matters of Trimark prior to, during or after
     your employment.  In addition, you agree that Trimark shall own all rights
     of every kind and character throughout the universe, in perpetuity of any
     material and/or ideas suggested or submitted by you or suggested or
     submitted to you by a third party. You agree also that Trimark shall own
     all other results and proceeds of your services during your employment.
<PAGE>
 
7.   You will be eligible for all Employee Benefits, Medical, Dental, Vision and
     Life and 401(k) per Trimark's standard Benefit program.

8.   If you are terminated by Trimark Holdings, Inc. for any reason other than
     cause, a severance amount equal to 50% of the balance of the contract at
     the time of termination will be paid to you by Trimark which will relieve
     each party of any obligations to each other.  Notwithstanding the
     foregoing, if control changes by acquisition or merger you will receive
     100% of the balance of the contract.

This Agreement shall be binding and supersedes any and all other agreements,
either oral or in writing.  Any modification of this agreement will be effective
only if signed by Trimark and you.

If the above meets with your approval, please countersign this letter and return
the fully executed letter to me.

Sincerely,                    AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

 
                              --------------------------
Mark Amin                     James Keegan
Chairman                      Date: 
                                   ---------------------