alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SERVE D JUN E 8 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C
. I N TH E MATTE RO F HALLOCHE M PHARM A CO. , LTD. ,

Respondent
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CPlONEOOO l (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2010-019 7
ADMINISTRATIV E LA W JUDGE' S ORDE RDISMISSIN G PROCEEDIN G AN D CANCELLIN G HEARIN G Th e partie s hav e informe dm e tha t the y hav e settle dthi s case . The y hav e file dawithdrawa l o f th e complain t

(o n behal f

o f th e Complainant ) an d awithdrawa l o f

th e Respondent' s reques t for ahearing
. I n consideratio n o f

th e foregoing , an dpursuan t t o §13.21 5 o f

th e Procedura l Rules , thi s proceedin g i s hereb y dismisse dwit h prejudice
. Th e hearin g schedule dfo r Jul y 20 , 201 0 i s cancelled
. I T I S S O ORDERED
. 

# '/L(L

Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docke t No
. CPlONEOOO

l (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON E COP Y Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attentio n Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m2014 *

ON E COP Y H e Xu , Respondent' s Counsel Dehen g La w Fir mShenzhe

n Office 11/F , Towe

r B , Anlia n Plaza , 401 8 Jintia n Road , Futia

n District , Shenzhe

n Guangdon g Province , Chin a TEL : 86-755-8828648 8 FAX : 86-755-8828649 9 e-mai l address : Shenzhen(a).dehenglaw.co m Palloche mPharmaCo. , Ltd. , Presiden t 17F, Venu s Scienc e Incubat e Cente r No
. 60 Xingguang Road , Ne w Nort h Zon e Chongqing , Chin a40112 1 TEL : 236-703-080 8 R
. Bennet t Sargent , Complainant' s Counse l Federa l Aviation Administration Offic e o f the Regiona

l Counse l 1 2 Ne w Englan dExecutiv e Park , ANE- 7 Burlington , M

A 0180 3 TEL : 781-238-705 8 FAX : 781-238-705 5 The Honorable Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La

w Judg e Office of Hearings , M-20 U.S
. Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jersey Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Building GroundFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 TEL : Attorne

y 202-366-2139 ; Lega

l Assistant : 202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S
. W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m2014 , Washington

, D C 20591 , Attn : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FANSTEEL INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE RELATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FILING FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         163,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,940,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                   254,165
<INVENTORY>                                 22,468,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,184,576
<PP&E>                                      71,368,197
<DEPRECIATION>                              50,637,546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,757,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,917,351
<BONDS>                                      2,462,302
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,497,145
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,094,295
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,757,240
<SALES>                                     37,045,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,045,160
<CGS>                                       30,592,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,521,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (320)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,473,210
<INCOME-TAX>                                   461,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,012,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,012,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
#### Ex parte Harriet C. WELCH.

77-684.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 15, 1978.

EMBRY, Justice.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, FAULKNER and ALMON, JJ., concur.
No. 10316.

#### The Village of Eaton *v.*Eckle.

Decided May 5, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Preble county.

*Messrs. King, Lovury & King,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. R. Pomerene*and *Messrs. Gilmore & Gilmore,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Jake R. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-728.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 30, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1971.

Ronald Payne, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevm, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Rodney Durrance, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We have thoroughly reviewed the briefs and record and heard oral argument. Based thereon we conclude appellant has failed to demonstrate harmful error. The judgment and sentence appealed from are affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-112360, 333-146114 and 333-157011) and Form S-8 (No. 333-155360, 333-130235, 333-122155, 333-138863, 333-112148, 333-112213, 333-71374, 333-03656, 333-92525, 333-39065, 333-50296 and 333-147423) of AdeptTechnology, Inc. of our report dated September 17, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule which appear in this Form 10-K. 

*/s/ Armanino McKenna LLP*

ARMANINO McKENNA LLP 

San Ramon, California 

September 17, 2009
#### TATE FLOOR COVERING, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald BILLEAUDEAUX, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3169.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 29, 1970.

Vernon C. McManus, Eunice, for defendant-appellant.

Jacque B. Pucheu, Eunice, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

SAVOY, Judge.

This is a suit on open account in the sum of $247.52. For a cause of action plaintiff alleged it sold certain merchandise to defendant, and the above sum is the unpaid balance. Plaintiff stated defendant had failed to pay said amount despite amicable demand.

Defendant filed a general denial to the suit. After a trial on the merits in the City Court, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant as prayed for. Defendant has appealed.

The record reveals that defendant’s wife went to plaintiff’s place of business to purchase some floor covering for a new home being constructed by her and defendant. The record reveals further that one of the employees of plaintiff informed defendant’s wife that the pattern she wanted was discontinued, and that it would have to be a special order; that he would specially order same to determine if it was still in stock, and for that reason she was receiving a special price for said merchandise; that the merchandise arrived, and defendant’s wife refused to accept same.

Defendant’s wife’s version of the transaction is that she went to plaintiff’s place of business and inquired as to the price of the flooring and told plaintiff’s employee she would call him back to determine whether she would buy the merchandise from plaintiff.

The trial judge accepted plaintiff’s employee’s testimony. Since this is a question of fact, we find no error in the ruling of the trial judge.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the City Court is affirmed at defendant’s costs.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8951-8952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP-97-225-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Technical Conference

February 21, 1997.
    In the Commission's order issued on February 7, 1997,\1\ in the 
above-captioned proceeding, the Commission held that the filing raises 
issues for which a technical conference is to be convened.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 78 FERC para. 61,112 (1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The conference to address the issues has been scheduled for 
Tuesday, March 11, 1997 at 10:00 a.m. in a room to be designated at the 
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.

[[Page 8952]]

    All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4818 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Before the Honorable D. Michael Chappell
Administrative Law Judge

PITT-DES MOINES, INC. a corporation

)

In the Matter of )

)

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANYN.V.  )

)

a foreign corporation, )
) Docket No. 9300

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY )
) Public Document

a corporation, )

)

and )

)

)

)

DECLARATION OF MARK RICHARD

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1726, I, Mark Richard, make the following statement:

1.

Jam Subcontract Administrator of Air Liquide Process and Construction, Inc.
(“ALPC”). Ihave been employed by ALPC since February 22, 1999.

lam providing this declaration in support of the motion filed by ALPC and
David Kamrath requesting that portions of Mr. Kamrath’s testimony in this
matter be accorded in camera treatment.

It is ALPC’s practice, when sourcing field erected LIN/LOX tanks, to seek
competitive bids from available suppliers. When such bids are received,
ALPC does not disclose to any bidder the amounts bid by other bidders on the

project. ,


. When ALPC retains a supplier to build a field erected LIN/LOX tank, it does
not discuss with other bidders the terms on which that supplier has been
retained.

. ALPC does not discuss with any one supplier of field erected LIN/LOX tanks
the competitive strengths and weaknesses of other actual or potential suppliers
of such tanks.

. ALPC does not discuss with any suppliers of field erected LIN/LOX tanks
ALPC’s procurement strategies. ALPC considers its strategies for procuring
such tanks to be extremely sensitive business information, the release of
which would materially increase the amount of money ALPC would pay for
the purchase of such tanks in the future.

. ALPC closely guards the information described in Paragraphs 3-5, above.
Information on the bids submitted for ALPC’s Freeport Project, for example,
is known with ALPC only to Mr. Kamrath; the Project Manager, Ms. Julie
Heil; the Mechanical Engineer, David Powell; the cold end Subsystems
Manager, Marc Ragouilliaux; Construction Manager, Jeff Lambert and to me,
as Contract Manager. I know of no way in which any bidder on the Freeport
Project could obtain information on the prices and terms offered by the other
bidders, except as a result of one of the six of us disclosing such information.
. ALPC believes that denying suppliers access to such information encourages
each supplier to provide its most competitive offering, as it cannot know with
any degree of certainty the pricing, terms or competitive strengths or

weaknesses of its competitors.


9. ALPC believes that public disclosure of competitive bid information, and the
strengths and weaknesses of individual contractors, will materially impair the
offerings ALPC receives in the future. Further, since ALPC seeks bids on
only a limited number of field erected LIN/LOX tanks each year, ALPC
believes that it will suffer such harm in the event such information is disclosed
publicly at any time within the next five (5) years.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this / 26 day of November 2002, at Houston, Texas.

Mok b Keichird

Mark Richard
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8960]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted 
throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 24, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. AmeriBancShares, Inc., Wichita Falls, Texas; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
AmeriBancShares of Delaware, Wilmington, Delaware, and thereby 
indirectly acquire American National Bank, Wichita Falls, Texas.
    2. AmeriBancShares of Delaware, Inc., Wilmington, Delaware; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting 
shares of American National Bank, Wichita Falls, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 21, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-4829 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of the Secretary 

July 18, 2013 

Melissa McTague 

State of New York 

Re: In the Matter of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., File No. 082 3199, Docket No. C-4407 

 In the Matter of DrJays.com, Inc., File No. 122 3063, Docket No. C-4408 

 In the Matter of Eminent, d/b/a Revolve Clothing, File No. 122 3065, Docket No. C-4409 

Dear Ms. McTague: 

 Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent agreements 

in the above-referenced proceedings. The Commission has placed your comment on the public 

record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii), 

and has given it serious consideration. 

Your comment raised concern that the agreements may not impose “meaningful 

consequences” on the respondents. After consideration of your comment, the Commission has 

determined that the relief set forth in the consent agreements is appropriate and sufficient to remedy 

the violations alleged in the complaints. The orders prohibit the respondents from web, mail, and 

catalog advertisements that violate the Fur Act and Rules. Under federal law, a violation of an FTC 

order is punishable by a civil penalty of up to $16,000 per violation. Therefore, if the respondents’ 

websites falsely advertise fur products as “faux” in the future, the respondents may be liable for 

significant civil penalties. Moreover, respondents have offered refunds to all consumers who 

purchased the falsely advertised products. 

Accordingly, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served by 

issuing the Decision and Order in each of these matters in final form without modification. The final 

Decisions and Orders and other relevant materials are available from the Commission’s website at 

http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, 

and we thank you again for your comment. 

By direction of the Commission. 

 Donald S. Clark 

 Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-30655, 333-74747, 333-74715, 333-78521, 333-78567, 333-83725, 333-35806,
333-62502 and 333-84010 of THQ Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statements No.
333-32221, 333-60277, 333-70335, 333-85269, 333-92361, 333-32526, 333-40698,
333-47914 and 333-81170 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 13, 2002 and
March 8, 2002 as to Note 9, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 22, 2002
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105 - 2498

**ME MORA**  **NDUM** SUBJECT: Heavy- Duty Hy brid Onboard Diagnostics FROM: Am y Kopin TO: The Docket DATE: July

15 , 2011 

### On July 6 th, 2011 we held a conference call with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to discuss concerns raised by hy brid manufacturers, engine manufacturers, and related industry trade groups regarding heavy- duty onboard diagnostic (OBD) requirements and tim ing. C oncerns were raised during the comment period for the heavy- duty greenhouse gas notice of proposed rulemaking that heavy- duty hy brid applications may

not be able to meet the 2013 heavy - duty

OBD regulations that were published in the 2009 OBD Final Ru lemaking . 1 , 2 

### Specifically , manufacturers have requested a delay of the application of HD OBD requirements for hy brid applications until 2020. Attendees from the EPA and CARB are shown in the table below. **Attendee Affiliation**  Cleophas Jackson EPA

– Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division Anthony Neam EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Amy Kopin EPA

– Assessment and Standards Division Lucina Negrete CARB Jessica Dean CARB Michael McCarthy CARB Michael Regenfuss CARB

1 U.S. EPA, NHTSA, and DOT, “Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium and Heavy - Duty Engines and Vehicles,” republished December 29, 2010. Available here: http://origin.www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR - 2010 - 12 - 29/html/2010 - 32726 .htm 2 U.S. EPA, “Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles and New Motor Vehicles Engines; Final Rule Regulations Requiring Onboard Diagnostic Systems on 2010 and Later Heavy - Duty Engines Used in Highway Applications Over 14,000 Pounds; Revisions t o Onboard Diagnostic Requirements for Diesel Highway Heavy - Duty Vehicles Under 14,000 Pounds ,” published February 24, 2009. Available here: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/im/obd/regtech/hd - obd - frm - 02 - 24 - 09 - notice - 74 - fr - 8310.pdf OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-71374,  333-66993,  333-92525,  333-39065,  333-50292 and 333-50296)
pertaining to the 2001 Stock Plan, 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1993 Stock
Plan,  1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1995 Director  Option Plan of Adept
Technology,  Inc.  of our  report  dated  July 29,  2002,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of  Adept  Technology,  Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.


                                                      ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
September 23, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8266-8267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4380]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AGENCY

Agency for International Development


Voluntary Foreign Aid Advisory Committee; Meeting

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby 
given of a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid 
(ACVFA).

[[Page 8267]]

    Date: March 12, 1997 (9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.).
    Location: State Department, Loy Henderson Auditorium, 23rd Street 
Entrance.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss an ACVFA Study on the 
State of the USAID/PVO Partnership.
    The meeting is free and open to the public. However, notification 
by noon, March 11, 1997, through the Advisory Committee Headquarters is 
required. Persons wishing to attend the meeting must call Lisa J. 
Douglas (703) 351-0243 or Susan Saragi (703) 351-0244 or FAX (703) 351-
0228/0212. Persons attending must include their name, organization, 
birthdate and social security number for security purposes.

    Dated: January 29, 1997.
Adele Liskov,
Acting Director, Office of Private and Voluntary Cooperation, Bureau 
for Humanitarian Response.
[FR Doc. 97-4380 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M