alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Sentigen Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
K. Pagano, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge,
that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the end of, and for, the period covered by the Report.

Date:  March 22, 2004

                        /s/ Joseph K. Pagano
                        ------------------------------------------------------
                        Name:  Joseph K. Pagano
                        Title: Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document. A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SENTIGEN HOLDING CORP. AND WILL BE
RETAINED SENTIGEN HOLDING CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7329 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

S74w16860 Janesville Road, in Muskego, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Colonel 

Hans Christian Heg Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2020 

Mr. STEIL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at S74w16860 Janesville Road, in Muskego, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Colonel Hans Christian Heg Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COLONEL HANS CHRISTIAN HEG POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located S74w16860 Janesville Road in 

6 Muskego, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Colonel Hans Christian Heg Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7329 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Colonel Hans Chris3 tian Heg Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1~ fiØ '?" ft ~ ~~ N
 

~.\l ~f,!.""\¡~ï.~:;~~
 ~.j ; 8 ~g b ~ %1,,, i-\r+:.ii 

Ó!Jýrg ¡o'f Z I¿~:,-:J
 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA l)#~(P1 

FEDERA TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES 

In the Matter of 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 9327 

) 

CERTIFICATION FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE INITIAL DECISION 

Rule 3.51(a) ofthe Commission's Rules of Practice states that an Initial Decision shall be 

filed "within ninety (90) days after closing the hearng record pursuant to § 3 .44( c) . . . or within 

such further time as the Commission may by order allow upon written request from the 

Administrative Law Judge." 16 C.F.R. § 3.51(a). Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.44(c), the 

hearing record was closed on June 22,2009. Ninety days from the close ofthe record wil be 

September 21,2009. For the reasons set forth below, pursuant to Rule 3.51(a), the undersigned 

seeks an extension of sixty days, unti November 20,2009, to file the Initial Decision in this 

case. 

Rule 3.51(a) also states that an Intial Decision shall be filed within one year "after the 

issuance of the administrative complaint, except that the Administrative Law Judge may, upon a 

finding of extraordinar circumstances, extend the one-year deadline for a period of up to sixty 

(60) days." 16 C.F.R. § 3.51(a). The Complaint in this matter was issued on September 9,2008. One year from the issuance of 
 the Complaint is September 9,2009. By separate order, that 

deadline wil be extended by the Administrative Law Judge.
 

The trial in this matter commenced on May 12, 2009 and concluded on June 12,2009. 

Closing arguments were heard on August 20,2009. Over 2,100 exhibits were admitted, 35 

witnesses testified, either live or by deposition, and there are 5,590 pages oftrial transcript. The 

paries' proposed findings of fact, replies to proposed findings of fact, post trial briefs, and reply 

briefs total 
 2,329 pages. The paries' final post trial briefs were fied on July 31,2009. 

The Initial Decision in In re Daniel Chapter One, Docket 9329, was issued on August 5, 

2009. The Intial Decision in In re Gemtronics, Inc., Docket 9330, wil be issued no later than 

September 16, 2009. 

The extensive record in this case must be thoroughly reviewed. Additional time is 

necessar to properly develop the findings of fact and legal analysis. Accordingly, the 
Commission is requested to extend the time for filing the Intial Decision by sixty days, to 

November 20,2009. 

j) ~ ~.g

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: September 2, 2009
 

2
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  Certification of Chief Financial Officer (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 1, 2003:

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Del Global  Technologies  Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended  November 1, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
V.  Gilboy,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350,  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section  15(d),  as applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                           /s/ Thomas V. Gilboy
                                           -------------------------
                                           Name: Thomas V. Gilboy
                                           Chief Financial Officer
                                           Date: December 12, 2003

      (1)   A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906
            has  been  provided  to Del  Global  Technologies  Corp  and will be
            retained  by Del Global  Technologies  Corp.  and  furnished  to the
            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
            U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
            as a separate disclosure document.
```
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Presidential Documents 25879 

Proclamation 9760 of May 31, 2018 

National Caribbean-American Heritage Month, 2018 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During Caribbean-American Heritage Month, we honor America’s long-shared 

history with our neighbors in the Caribbean and celebrate the Caribbean 

Americans who have enriched our Nation. 

Caribbean Americans embody the American spirit, with their talents and 

hard work contributing greatly to America’s economy. They protect our 

citizens as law enforcement officers, serve our communities as public officials, and mentor our country’s young people as educators. Through their 

tremendous athleticism and determination, they have brought pride to the 

hearts of the American people as members of numerous U.S. Olympic teams. 

Their leadership and resolve have made incredible contributions to our 

society. 

As trailblazers, Americans with Caribbean roots have sewn their own unique 

thread into the fabric of our Nation. Dr. William Thornton, a native of 

the British Virgin Islands, designed the United States Capitol and is generally 

considered the first ‘‘Architect of the Capitol’’. Jean Baptiste du Sable, the 

first permanent resident of Chicago, was born in Haiti. Widely recognized 

as the ‘‘Founder of Chicago,’’ his prosperous trade settlement has become 

one of the most iconic cities in the world. 

This month, we acknowledge the numerous contributions of Caribbean Americans to our Nation, including those of the more than 4 million Caribbean 

Americans who live in the United States today. We are also deeply grateful 

to the many Caribbean Americans who have served or are currently serving 

our country as members of our Armed Forces. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2018 as National 

Caribbean-American Heritage Month. I encourage all Americans to join in 

celebrating the history, culture, and achievements of Caribbean Americans 

with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PRESDOC3
25880 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 108 / Tuesday, June 5, 2018 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-second. 

[FR Doc. 2018–12152 

Filed 6–4–18; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3295–F8–P 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PRESDOC3Trump.EPS</GPH>
10.8 - Term Note Badgerland






TERM NOTE
	
		
	$3,333,333.33
	February 27, 2014






FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HIGHWATER ETHANOL, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Badgerland Financial, ACA (the “Bank”), the principal sum of $3,333,333.33.  The Borrower further agrees to pay interest in like money to the Bank on the unpaid principal amount hereof from time to time outstanding at the rates and on the dates specified in the Credit Agreement (as defined below), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement; all such payments, unless sooner paid, shall be made no later than the Maturity Date.  All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Credit Agreement.


This Term Note is one of the Term Notes evidencing the Term Loan referred to in that certain Credit Agreement of even date herewith among the Borrower, the Bank and the other commercial, banking or financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, and AgStar Financial Services, PCA, as Administrative Agent (the “Agent”) (such agreement, as it may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”).    


This Term Note is subject to prepayment as provided in the Credit Agreement.


This Term Note is secured as provided in the Loan Documents.  Reference is hereby made to the Loan Documents for a description of the properties and assets in which a mortgage, security interest or other lien has been granted, the nature and extent of the security, and the terms and conditions upon which such mortgages, liens and security interests were granted and the rights of the Bank in respect thereof.  


Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any one or more of the Events of Default set forth in Section 6.01 of the Credit Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Term Note shall, at the election of the Agent, be immediately due and payable, all as provided in the Credit Agreement.


The Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and dishonor of this Term Note.


This Term Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota (without reference to the choice of law principles thereof).


The Borrower hereby submits to the jurisdiction of any Minnesota State court sitting in Blue Earth County, Minnesota, or Federal court sitting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Term Note, and the Borrower hereby agrees that claims in respect of such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in such Minnesota State court or in such Federal court.  The Borrower hereby waives, to the fullest extent it may effectively do so, the defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such action or proceeding.


	
		
	 
	HIGHWATER ETHANOL, LLC, a Minnesota

	 
	limited liability company

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Brian Kletscher

	 
	By: Brian Kletscher

	 
	Its: Chief Executive Officer
·--------:r."'"' 

In the Matter of 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

PUBLIC 

ECM BioFilms, Inc., 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NO. 9358 

a corporation, also d/b/a 

Enviroplastics International, 

Respondent. _____________________________ ) 

ORDER ON NON-PARTY BIO-TEC'S MOTION 

TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM 

On February 28,2014, non-party Bio-Tec Environmental, LLC ("Bio-Tec") filed a 

Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum ("Motion' ) served on it by Respondent ECM 

'BioFilms, Inc. ("ECM''). 

Non-party Bio-Tee filed its Motion pursuant to Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") Rule 

334(c), which provides: "Any motion by the subject of a subpoena to limit or quash the 

subpoena shall be filed within the earlier of I 0 days after service thereof or the time for 

compliance therewith. Such motions shall set forth all assertions of privilege or other factual and 

legal objections to the subpoena, including all appropriate arguments, affidavits and other 

supporting documentation, and shall include the statement required by§ 3..22(g)." 16 C.F.R. 

§ 3.34(c). The subpoena thatBio-Tec seeks to have quashed was signed on February 13, 2014, 

and sought compliance by February 28,2014. Thus, Bio-Tec's Motion is timely filed. In its 

Motion, Bio-Tec includes the statement required by FTC Rule 3.22(g), certifying that it had 

conferred with counsel for Respondent in an attempt to resolve by agreement the issues raised in 

the Motion. 

Rule 3 .22( d) sets forth: "Within 10 days after service of any written motion, or within 

such longer or shorter time as may be designated by the Administrative Law Judge ... , the 

opposing party shall answer or shall be deemed to have consented to the granting of the relief 

asked for in the motion." 16 C.F.R. § 3.22(d). Bio-Tec's Motion was filed on February 28, 

2014. In its Certificate of Service, Bio-Tec's attorney certifies that it served a copy of its Motion 

on counsel for Respondent by electronic mail upon Lou Caputo, Emord & Associates, at 

LCaputo@emord.com. Mr. Caputo has filed a Notice of Appearance in this matter in which he 

provided his email address as that same email address: LCaputo@emord.com . 

... _...,.._.-----:---------
Respondent has not filed an opposition, or otherwise notified the Office of 

Administrative Law Judges that the underlying dispute has been resolved within 10 days of 

service ofBio-Tec's Motion, as required by Rule 3.22(d). Therefore, pursuant to Rule 3.22(d), 

Respondent shall be deemed to have consented to the granting ofthe relief requested in the 

motion, and the subpoena is hereby QUASHED. However, Bio-Tee's additional request that it 

be "awarded its attorney's fees and costs, as well as such other relief, both legal and equitable, to 

which it may show itself justly entitled" is DENIED. Accordingly, Bio-Tec's Motion is 

GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Cha ell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 18,2014 

2
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Adept
Technology,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on
his knowledge:

         o        the  amended  Annual  Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for
                  the fiscal  year ended June 30, 2003 fully  complies  with the
                  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         o        the information  contained in such report fairly presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.

Dated:  October 8, 2003

/s/ Brian R. Carlisle
---------------------------------
Brian R. Carlisle
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Adept Technology, Inc.



/s/ Michael W. Overby
---------------------------------
Michael W. Overby
Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer of
Adept Technology, Inc.

                                       12
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DALE RICHARD PATE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1460 

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

 )

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 28, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Frank Quesada, Judge.

Dale Richard Pate, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub,

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; 

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, C.J., and LaROSE and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
#### Martha Ward GARNER, etc., Appellant, v. Vera Wilson WARD, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. M-473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 30, 1971.

A. K. Black and J. B. Hodges, Lake City, for appellant.

Paul Bernardini, of Sands, Smalbein, Eubank, Johnson & Rozier, Daytona Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court of Florida, filed July 7, 1971, 251 So.2d 252, for Rehearing denied September 3, 1971, wherein the Per Curiam opinion of this Court, 237 So.2d 25, rendered in said cause was quashed, it is the opinion of this Court that we agree with the opinion of the Supreme Court and adopt its opinion as the opinion of this court, and reverse the order appealed, and the same is remanded to the lower court for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion and the opinion of the Supreme Court rendered in this case.

Reversed and remanded.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
# , .

Fallon Brizendine, Plaintiff,


### v. Charles Herbold, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED NOV 302009 Clerk, 

## u.s. District and Bankruptcy Courts 

# 09 

# 2275

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffspro se complaint and application to proceed informapauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack ofsubject matterjurisdiction. The subject matterjurisdiction ofthe federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federaljurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are ofdiverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking reliefin the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court'sjurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal ofthe action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff, a resident ofFrederick, Maryland, sues a resident ofthe District ofColumbia for an alleged debt of$14, 465.00 "accrued over a 2-year period." Compi. at 1. The complaint neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for diversityjurisdiction because the amount in controversy is well below the minimum amount for diversityjurisdiction.

### Accordingly, the complaint must be dismissed. 1 

### A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

# /I**~** <.,.J"., 

### l Date:**~r** 

### __ ,**~009** 

### United States DistrIct Judge 

# -

1 

### Presumably, plaintiffs recourse lies 

### in the Superior Court ofthe District ofColumbia. 2