alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4485]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Services; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
advisory committee meeting of the National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel:

    Committee Name: Mechanisms of Anesthetic Action on Signal 
Transduction.
    Date: March 26, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.-until conclusion.
    Place: Omni Hotel, 235 W. Main Street, Charlottesville, Virginia 
22902.
    Contact Person: Irene B. Glowinski, Ph.D., Office of Scientific 
Review, 45 Center Drive, Room 1AS-13J, Bethesda, MD 20892-6200, 301-
594-2772 or 301-594-3663.
    Purpose: To review and evaluate program project applications.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support [MBRS].)

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-4485 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Farmers Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
June 30, 2000 and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the six
month period ended June 30, 2000 (unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         255,925
<SECURITIES>                                    29,224
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               516,769
<PP&E>                                         779,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                 343,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,796,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,513,921
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,970,896
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,796,688
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,680,575
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,087,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                571,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                   223,039
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            348,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   348,799
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
#### Ellis EDMOND v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38322.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
EXHIBIT 11

DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
NINE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 29, 2000

                                                                      Per Share
                                             Net Income     Shares      Amount
                                             ----------     ------      ------

          Basic Earnings Per Share:

          Income available to common
              shareholders                   $5,217,993   7,807,739    $   .67
                                             ----------   ---------    =======


          Effect of Dilutive Securities:

          Warrants                                --         12,141

          Options                                 --        350,672
                                             ----------  ----------


          Diluted Earnings Per Share         $5,217,993   8,170,552   $   .64
                                             ==========   =========   =======






















                                      -15-
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Herbert WILLIAMS v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Hon. Matthew Braniff, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 61141.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Herbert Williams applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied. Moot.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 94-2450
ALBERT CHARLES BURGESS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS J. ANDREWS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CA-86-503-C-C-P) Submitted: March 26, 1996 Decided: April 16, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Cartwright Carmichael, Jr., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil action for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burgess v. Andrews , No. CA-86-503-C-C-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 21, 1994; Oct. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

November 10, 2014

Common Sense

State of Minnesota

Re: In the Matter of Made in the USA Brand, LLC

File No. 142 3121, Docket No. C-4497

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent agreement in 

the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment and placed it on the 

public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. §

4.9(b)(6)(ii).

In your comment, you state that, “Made in America should stand for something,” and request 

that the Commission require marketers to substantiate their U.S.-origin and other claims. You do not 

propose any revisions to the draft complaint or the consent agreement.

Section 5 of the FTC Act requires companies to possess substantiation for their marketing 

claims, and the Commission’s Enforcement Policy Statement on U.S.-Origin Claims provides specific 

guidance to marketers on how to substantiate those claims.1

 In particular, the Policy Statement provides 

that when a marketer makes an unqualified “Made in USA” claim, the marketer should – at the time the 

representation is made – possess and rely upon a reasonable basis establishing that the product is “all or 

virtually all” made in the United States. In this case, Section II of the consent agreement specifically 

requires Made in the USA Brand, LLC either to possess competent and reliable evidence substantiating 

its representations that products are made in the USA, or to disclose that it relies on self-certification to 

substantiate its clients’ claims.

Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission has determined that the relief set 

forth in the consent agreement is appropriate and sufficient to remedy the violations alleged in the 

complaint. At this time, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served by 

issuing the Decision and Order in final form without modification. The final Decision and Order and 

other relevant materials are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the 

Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, and we thank you again for your 

comment.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

 

1 See 15 U.S.C. § 45(a) and Federal Trade Commission, Issuance of Enforcement Policy Statement on 

“Made in USA” and Other U.S. Origin Claims, 62 Fed. Reg. 63756, 63766 (December 2, 1997), 

available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/1997/december/ 971202madeinusa.pdf.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 8413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[OH102-1b; FRL-5675-4]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Ohio

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is 
proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 
submitted by the State of Ohio on August 30, 1996, which would provide 
Ford Motor Company an extended exemption from opacity limitations for 
start-up of coal-fired boilers at its Cleveland Engine Plant 1. This 
revision would extend the exemption from 3 hours to 6 hours after 
start-up. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, USEPA is 
approving this SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because the agency views this as a noncontroversial revision 
and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the 
approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments 
are received in response to this proposed rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this rule. However, if the USEPA receives 
significant adverse comments which have not been previously addressed, 
the direct final rule will be withdrawn and the public comments 
received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this 
proposed rule. The USEPA does not plan a second comment period on this 
action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.

DATES: Comments must be received in writing by March 27, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the revision request are available for inspection 
at the following address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. (It is recommended that you telephone John Summerhays 
at (312) 886-6067 before visiting the Region 5 Office.)
    Written comments should be sent to: J. Elmer Bortzer, Chief, 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Summerhays, at (312) 886-6067.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action of the same title which is located in the Rules and 
Regulations Section of this Federal Register.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

    Dated: January 30, 1997.
David A. Ullrich,
Acting Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-4521 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB-33 (Sub-No. 103X)]


Union Pacific Railroad Company--Abandonment Exemption--in Sarpy 
County, NE (Gilmore Industrial Lead)

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempts Union Pacific 
Railroad Company from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 
10903 to abandon service over a portion of rail line known as the 
Gilmore Industrial Lead in Sarpy County, NE, subject to standard labor 
protective conditions. The line extends between milepost 11.76 and 
milepost 12.23, near Gilmore, NE, a distance of 0.47-mile.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file a financial 
assistance offer has been received, this exemption will be effective on 
March 27, 1997. Formal expressions of intent to file financial 
assistance offers under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) must be filed by March 7, 
1997. Petitions to stay must be filed by March 12, 1997. Petitions to 
reopen must be filed by March 24, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to STB Docket No. AB-33 (Sub-No. 
103X) to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Surface 
Transportation Board, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20423; and (2) Petitioner's representative: Joseph D. Anthofer, 1416 
Dodge Street, Room 830, Omaha, NE 68179-0830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: February 13, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4642 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 73 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 73

 To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a 
              major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2019

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To terminate the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a 
              major non-NATO ally, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF DESIGNATION OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF 
              PAKISTAN AS A MAJOR NON-NATO ALLY.

    (a) In General.--Effective beginning on the date of the enactment 
of this Act--
            (1) the designation of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as 
        a major non-NATO ally pursuant to section 517(a)(1) of the 
        Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321k(a)(1)) or any 
        other provision of law is hereby terminated; and
            (2) the President may not issue a separate designation of 
        the Islamic Republic of Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally 
        pursuant to section 517(a)(1) of such Act or any other 
        provision of law unless the President submits to Congress a 
        certification described in subsection (b).
    (b) Certification.--A certification described in this subsection is 
a certification that contains a determination of the President that--
            (1) Pakistan continues to conduct military operations that 
        are contributing to significantly disrupting the safe haven and 
        freedom of movement of the Haqqani Network in Pakistan;
            (2) Pakistan has taken steps to demonstrate its commitment 
        to prevent the Haqqani Network from using any Pakistani 
        territory as a safe haven;
            (3) the Government of Pakistan actively coordinates with 
        the Government of Afghanistan to restrict the movement of 
        militants, such as the Haqqani Network, along the Afghanistan-
        Pakistan border; and
            (4) Pakistan has shown progress in arresting and 
        prosecuting Haqqani Network senior leaders and mid-level 
        operatives.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84393, 333-66993, 333-39065 and 333-3656) pertaining
to the BYE/Oasis  Engineering,  Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan, 1998 Employee Stock
Purchase  Plan,  1993 Stock Plan,  1995  Employee  Stock  Purchase Plan and 1995
Director  Option Plan of Adept  Technology,  Inc. of our report  dated August 2,
1999,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedule of
Adept  Technology,  Inc.  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended June 30, 1999.


                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Jose, California
September 23, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,314
<SECURITIES>                                     1,073
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,282
<INVENTORY>                                      3,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           4,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,326)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         34,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,604
<SALES>                                         95,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,534
<CGS>                                           75,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   75,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,099
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   343
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,639
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                       402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,711
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.23
<FN>
<F1>IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY PRACTICE THE COMPANY PREPARES AN UNCLASSIFIED
BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>


</TABLE>