alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40200

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN VENEGAS-ORTEGA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-97-CR-274-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 20, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

 

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Venegas-Ortega appeals his sentence from his guiltyplea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(2). He argues that the

district court erred and acted in violation of his right to due

process by imposing a sixteen-point enhancement pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) for his Texas felony conviction for

possession of cocaine.

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate 
No. 98-40200

-2-

record. We conclude that the district court did not err in

applying § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), see United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez,

130 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir. 1997), and that Venegas-Ortega’s

constitutional argument, raised for the first time on appeal, is

unfounded. See United States v. Pearson, 910 F.2d 221, 223 (5th

Cir. 1991); United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th

Cir. 1994)(en banc).

AFFIRMED.
***Exhibit 32.1******Certification of Chief Executive Officer (1)***Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the following certification is being made to accompany the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2006:In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter F. Schneider, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.           /s/James A. Risher   Name:  James A. Risher    Chief Executive OfficerDate: December 8, 2006  (1) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto Del Global Technologies Corp and will be retained by Del Global Technologies Corp. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      493
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (13)
<INVENTORY>                                        103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,808
<PP&E>                                           6,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,987)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              889
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,804
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,503
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (459)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,295)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,056)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,399)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.39)


</TABLE>
From: "Susan Thorsell" <SThorsell@astburyenviro.com>

To: "Jack Hampton" <jhampton@aluminumrt.com>

Cc: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/30/2010 05:46 PM

Subject: Aluminum Recovery Technologies Kendallville, Indiana

- ICR Stack Testing Report Attachment

P lease find attached the results of stack testing to comply with the ICR request from the United States

Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).



## Susan

Susan Thorsell

Project Manager

Air Analysis Division

Astbury Environmental Engineering

5757 We st 74th Street

Indianapolis, Indiana 46278

317.472.0999 office

877.683.8378 toll free

317.472.0993 fax

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email transmission is intended only for the addressee shown above.

It may contain information that is privil eged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review,

dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by telephone or return e

- mail, and

delete the message permanently from your computer system.
#### C. Dana ROLLINGS, Appellant, v. June Kirn ROLLINGS, Appellee.

No. 78-312.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 22, 1978.

Richard E. Nelson and Robert C. Widman of Nelson, Hesse, Cyril, Weber & Sparrow, Sarasota, for appellant.

Clyde C. Goebel of Grimes, Goebel, Parry, Blue & Boylston, Bradenton, for appellee.

RYDER, Judge.

The appellant/husband appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage and raises only one meritorious point on appeal, that relating to an award of child support to his three children in the sum of $200.00 *701per month per child. Two of the children at the time of the final judgment were sixteen and thirteen. The third, Ann, was eighteen years of age.

There is authority in this state to require continuance of support of dependent progeny past the age of majority, and, in certain instances, when they attend college.1 However, under the facts of this case, and in the absence of an agreement by the appellant to continue support for his eighteen year old daughter, we find the trial court erred in ordering such support for her. *Kowalski v. Kowalski,*315 So.2d 497 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); *White v. White,*296 So.2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); *Perla v. Perla,*58 So.2d 689 (Fla.1952).

Therefore, to the extent the final judgment orders payment of child support to appellant’s daughter Ann after her eighteenth birthday the same should be and is hereby reversed. However, this judgment of dissolution in all other aspects should be and is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and OTT, J., concur.

1

. *Finn v. Finn,*312 So.2d 726 (Fla.1975); *Kern*v. *Kern,*360 So.2d 482 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). In all fairness to the trial judge herein, the *Kern*case was decided July 12, 1978, some months after the entry of the trial judge’s order.
# H A R D W A R E

O n

­ b o a r d S e n s o r s :

H u m i d i t y

, T e m p e r a t u r e

, P r e s s u r e

, I n c i d e n t L i g h t

P r o c e s s o r s :

7 2 0 M H z d u a l

­ c o r e L i n u x C P U

I n t e r f a c e s :

W i f i

, E t h e r n e t

, S e r i a l

, U S B

, D i g i t a l

, A n a l o g

, I I C

W e i g h t :

5

. 3 l b s

W i n g s p a n :

4

. 9 f t

P a y l o a d :

C a p a c i t y

­ 2

. 2 l b s S w a p p a b l e

# E N H A N C E D G R O U N D

K I T

S T A N D A R D G R O U N D K I T

E v e r y P r e c i s i o n H a w k p l a t f

o r m i s s o l d w i t h a l l t h e i t e m s y o u n e e d t o f l y i t :



### ● +

● H a r d

­ s i d e d p e l i c a n c a s e



### ● +

● O n e s e t o f w i n g s

### ● +

● T w o p r o p e l l e r s



### ● +

● T w o b a t t e r i e s



### ● +

● O n e t a i l



### ● +

● T h e f l i g h t s o f

t w a r e t o d o w n l o a d o n y o u r o w n l a p t o p



# E N H A N C E D G R O U N D K I T

T h e E n h a n c e d G r o u n d K i t i s f

o r c l i e n t s w h o p r e f e r t o h a v e a d e e p e r t o o l

s e t f o r t h e d a y t o d a y o p e r a t i o n o f t h e i r p l a t f o r m

.



### ● +

● W i n d o w s S u r

f a c e P r o 3 w i t h a l l s o f

t w a r e p r e

­ l o a d e d a n d f u l l y

s e t u p



### ● +

● 1 a d d i t i o n a l s e t o f w i n g s



### ● +

● 2 a d d i t i o n a l b a t t e r i e s

### ● +

● 3 a d d i t i o n a l p r o p e l l e r s



### ● +

● 1 t o o l k i t ( e x t r a s m a l l p a r t s a n d t o o l s d e s i g n e d f o r d a i l y

o p e r a t i o n s )



### ● +

● 1 a d d i t i o n a l t a i l t h a t i n c l u d e s r a d i o

# S E R V I C E P A C K A G E

O n e p a c k a g e p e r U A V

. O n l y a v a i l a b l e a t t h e t i m e o f p u r c h a s e

.

● +

● O p t i o n t o r e p l a c e t h e U A V a i r f r a m e f r a m e w o r k o n c e o v e r t h e f i r s t

1 2 m o n t h s

.



### ● +

● O p t i o n t o r e p l a c e t h e b r o k e n f r a m e w i t h n e w e r i t e r a t i o n s i n c a s e s

w h e r e l a t e r g e n e r a t i o n s o f h a r d w a r e a r e a v a i l a b l e

.



### ● +

● S t o r a g e a n d c o m p l e t i o n o f b a c k

­ u p s y s t e m s i n t h e e v e n t o f a

r e p a i r

, w i t h r e t u r n a n d r e p l a c e m e n t s h i p p i n g c o v e r e d v i a G r o u n d

L e v e l o r P r i o r i t y M a i l



### ● +

● D e s i g n a t e d P r e c i s i o n H a w k a c c o u n t s u p p o r t
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT, AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1995.  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS APPEARING ON PAGE 5 OF FORM 10-Q FOR
3 MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   37,370,311
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  3,023,091
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      13,569,291
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,007,799
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,970,492
<COMMON>                                     1,834,445
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,356,043
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         11,243,258
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              14,433,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         6,500,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          19,600,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  800,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              14,636,746
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               55,970,492
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   11,454,602
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           185,018
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  10,932,145
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  11,117,163
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        337,439
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             187,710
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 525,149
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       431,150
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,999
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                6,868,683
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                     (2,173,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        








</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 and

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The
Undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Federal-Mogul Corporation (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: July 27, 2007



By:

/s/ José Maria AlapontJosé Maria AlapontChairman, President,and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ G. Michael LynchG. Michael LynchChief Financial Officer




73
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7467 

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 to 

allow a grantee of revolving loan funds to transfer certain funds to 

other eligible projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. PANETTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Works and Economic Development 

Act of 1965 to allow a grantee of revolving loan funds 

to transfer certain funds to other eligible projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Revolving Loan Fund 

5 Flexibility Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7467 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVOLVING LOAN FUND FLEXIBILITY. 

2 Section 209(d) of the Public Works and Economic 

3 Development Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3149(d)) is amend4 ed— 

5 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 

6 paragraphs (4) and (5); and 

7 (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the fol8 lowing: 

9 ‘‘(3) REVOLVING LOAN FUND REPURPOSING.— 

10 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A grantee of revolving 

11 loan funds may, upon request, transfer any 

12 funds that have been repaid to a revolving loan 

13 fund under this section to any other project eli14 gible to receive funding under this section. 

15 ‘‘(B) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible to 

16 transfer revolving loan funds under this para17 graph, a grantee shall have more cash available 

18 for lending than the average cash available for 

19 lending in the EDA region in which such grant20 ee is located. 

21 ‘‘(C) DISCRETION.—The Secretary shall 

22 retain the discretion to approve or deny a trans23 fer request under this paragraph. 

24 ‘‘(D) CASH AVAILABLE FOR LENDING DE25 FINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘cash 

26 available for lending’ means the revolving loan 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7467 IH

1 fund cash available for lending net of the com2 mitted revolving loan fund cash.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining
to the Cascade Bancorp 2008 Performance Incentive Plan of our reports dated
March 10, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Cascade
Bancorp and subsidiary (collectively, Cascade Bancorp) and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of Cascade Bancorp included in
Cascade Bancorps Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008.

/s/ Symonds, Evans
& Company, P.C.

Portland,
OregonMarch 10, 2009

---
'" ~-~: ¡''' ~ ~" . '; ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES ÔF AMERICA
 

FEDERAL TRAECOMMISSI0N
 J , ~ \.' ¡,' .'.;. ,. ,..',. :. OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES 

" . "
 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

McWANE, INC., 

a corporation, and 

) 

) 

) DOCKET NO. 9351 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

a limited parnership, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF 

MCW ANE, INC. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On March 20,2012, Respondent McWane, Inc. ("McWane") filed an unopposed motion 

to extend the time for McWane to file a response to SIP Industres' ("SIP") Motion to Quash 

McWane's Subpoena Duces Tecum ("Motion to Quash") served on it by SIP on or about March 

9,2012. McWane states that pursuant to the Federal Trade Commission Rules of 
 Practice, 

16 C.F.R. § 3.22(d), the deadline to file a response to the Motion to Quash was March 19,2012. 

McWane seeks to extend its deadline to March 30, 2012. 

In support of 
 its motion, McWane states that the parties are engaged in negotiations 

regarding the scope of 
 McWane's specifications, SIP's objections, and the time required for SIP 

to produce responsive documents and data. McWane further states that SIP does not oppose an 

extension and agrees that McWane should have an extension through March 30, 2012, to 

facilitate those negotiations and to file a response to SIP's Motion to Quash, should there remain 

any unresolved issues. 

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that the deadline for McWane to file any response to SIP's Motion to Quash shall be 

March 30, 2012. 

ORDERED: ::W\~
 D. Michael Chapp i 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 20,2012
EXHIBIT 32

       CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C.SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Decorator Industries, Inc.
      ("the Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2008,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), we, William A. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, and Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 12, 2008                   By: /s/ William A. Johnson
                                            -----------------------
                                            William A. Johnson,
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 12, 2008                   By: /s/ Michael K. Solomon
                                            -----------------------
                                            Michael K. Solomon,
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 United States Code § 1350 and

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

The
Undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Federal-Mogul Corporation (the Company) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: May 1, 2007



By:

/s/ José Maria AlapontJosé Maria AlapontChairman, Presidentand Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ G. Michael LynchG. Michael LynchChief Financial Officer




63
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130957 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TAMEKA BRANCHE, Robert P. Young, Jr. Personal 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Tommie Charles Tyson,

Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130957 

 COA: 266255 
 Wayne CC: 05-514262-NH

SINAI-GRACE HOSPITAL, a/k/a 

SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATER 

DETROIT,

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

DANIEL J. WALZ, M.D.,

 Defendant.
 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 26, 2006, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 

2006 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Washington v Sinai Hospital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641). On order of the 

Court, the case having been decided on June 27, 2007, 478 Mich 412 (2007), the 

application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Braverman 

v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-134446) is pending on appeal before this 

Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present 

application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE 

pending the decision in that case. 

l1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2007 

 Clerk