alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.

                              -------------------
            Adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
                  of the General Law of the State of Delaware
                               -------------------
    WE, ROBERT F. ORLICH, President and ELIZABETH M. TUCK, Secretary of
TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC., a corporation existing under the Laws of the State
of Delaware, DO HEREBY CERTIFY under the seal of said corporation as follows:

    FIRST: The Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, as amended, has
been amended so that the first paragraph of ARTICLE FOUR thereof shall read in
its entirety as follows:

          'FOURTH. The total number of shares of all classes of stock
          which the Company shall have authority to issue is
          105,000,000 shares, of which 100,000,000 shares of the par
          value of $1.00 per share shall be designated as Common
          Stock and 5,000,000 shares of the par value of $1.00 per
          share shall be designated as Preferred Stock.

    SECOND; That such amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware by the Board of Directors of said corporation and by the affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present and entitled to vote at
the May 20, 1999 Annual Meeting of Shareholders duly called and held upon notice
in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

    THIRD: that the capital of the corporation will not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have both signed this certificate and caused the
corporate seal of the corporation to be hereunder affixed this 25th day of May,
1999.

                                          /s/ ROBERT F. ORLICH
                                          ....................................
                                          Robert F. Orlich
                                          President

ATTEST:

/s/ ELIZABETH M. TUCK
 ......................................
Elizabeth M. Tuck
Secretary
#### Angelika Y. LASSETER, Appellant, v. John A. LASSETER, Appellee.

No. 70-34.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 24, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1970.

William John Mason, Miami, for appellant.

Abramson & Butter, Miami Beach, for appellee.

*456Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, wife, appeals a final judgment of divorce and assigns as error the amount of child support and the amount of attorney’s fees allowed. In addition she assigns as error the denial of her prayer for permanent alimony. We have reviewed the record and find that in each instance the appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion vested in the trial judge. Beaty v. Beaty, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 54; Cf. Farr v. Farr, Fla.App.1964, 164 So.2d 890.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6630

JERRY A. GARLAND, Petitioner - Appellant, versus L. M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-418-7) Submitted: August 31, 2001 Decided: March 11, 2002 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry A. Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jerry A. Garland seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Garland v. Saunders , No. CA-00- 418-7 (W.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2001). Garland’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# j^^ll«®W0FCR|||,NALAppEAU JAM 08 2015 Usas i-orwarded ~Lb your CaurL tor Consid trek) on .



# ~7rU( Ccarf C*us*. A/0. t&ZXl+Cp (P>ToUr\ burly)



# UJr'rL C«us<l A/6. Cfl27.9¥t-t) \ Rrouin C„unhy) ffcaSiL Uh m e Knour 2Jou f€ce;i/«J 'rfz . 

### n>ny lxJr\±: A/umb^r. TAo.ak /?/*>, 

### jOUckS<L S<?nJ -7^76. yotf, 

### ?ny CuLkAA^ 

### Qzrx'tho l/aSFUeZ- D'fCLZ_ 4tlcT<f707( •

_ Dick Uxre Un,± IL>XIS: FAA 3525

- 

## Color*Jo C;iY/TK, 7?S 12. '

-TkanK you -K>r 

## youf as^i'iianceL 'is\~Lk'<$ mcdk%r. i5~tr\C<-r< W VourS , '• TS-XsnJjUr- / / > _Qjl&/j 1 k

-

,

. • > . • .•

' ' ,'• ' ' ••'•.••'' ) ' •'•''.. ' •" •
#### R & H MOTORS, INC., Appellant, v. SENTRY INSURANCE, Appellee.

No. 72-406.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, July 11, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(718) 834-2203.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Wednesday, July 11, 2018, 
at 2:00 p.m., Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Robert Rosalia. For more information please contact Robert 
Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203, or write TAP Office, 2 
Metrotech Center, 100 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or contact us 
at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include 
various IRS issues.

    Dated: June 1, 2018.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-12205 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8940-8941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-255-000]


TransColorado Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 18, 1997, TransColorado Gas 
Transmission Company (TransColorado) tendered for filing to become part 
of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff 
sheets, to become effective March 20, 1997:

Second Revised Sheet No. 103
First Revised Sheet No. 113
First Revised Sheet No. 200
First Revised Sheet No. 262

[[Page 8941]]

Original Sheet Nos. 263 and 264

    TransColorado states that the above tariff sheets are being filed 
to implement a negotiated/recourse rate program for TransColorado's 
transportation services as contemplated by the Commission's Statement 
of Policy on Alternatives to Traditional Cost-of-Service Ratemaking for 
Natural Gas Pipelines and Regulations of Negotiated Transportation 
Services of Natural Gas Pipelines issued January 31, 1996 at Docket 
Nos. RM95-6-000 and RM96-7-000.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4819 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DALE RICHARD PATE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1460 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) )

Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 28, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge. Dale Richard Pate, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa; for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, C.J., and LaROSE and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fansteel Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Curtis J. Zamec, II, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and Earl F. White, as Vice President Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fansteel Inc. and will be retained by Fansteel Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Date:    August 14, 2009
/s/ Curtis J. Zamec, IICurtis J. Zamec, IIPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Earl F. WhiteEarl F. WhiteVice President Finance and Administration, Chief FinancialOfficer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Antonia Maria GARCIA and Eduardo Fernandez, Appellants, v. PRUDENCE MUTUAL CASUALTY CO., Appellee.

No. 69-374.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 8, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0064. JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN v. SARAH SIEDENTOPF et al.

On April 16, 2019, the trial court entered a final order dismissing the complaint

filed by Jean Jocelyn Merilien asserting “conspiracy to commit fraud/racial

discrimination” against Sarah Siedentopf (a private attorney), Tina Robinson (Clerk

of the Fulton County Superior Court), Adrienne Nash (Grievance Counselor for the

State Bar of Georgia), and an unnamed clerk of the Fulton County Superior Court.

Merilien then filed a motion to set aside the judgment pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-60

(d). On June 21, 2019, the trial court denied the motion to set aside, and Merilien filed

this direct appeal. However, we lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), a judgment may be set aside based on (1) lack of

jurisdiction, (2) fraud, accident, or mistake, or (3) a non-amendable defect on the face

of the record of pleadings. An appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a

judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) must be made by application for discretionary

review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). Merilien properly filed a discretionary application,

which this Court denied. See Case No. A20D0009, denied July 29, 2019. Because

that denial was an adjudication on the merits, the doctrine of res judicata bars this

direct appeal. See Northwest Social & Civic Club, Inc. v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860

(583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. 

August 07, 2019
App. 258, 260-261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/07/2019
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-36754, 33-52506, 33-62098, 33-58637, 33-58639, 333-88151, and 333-88773 of BJ
Services Company on Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 33-58017 of BJ
Services Company on Form S-4 of our report dated November 16, 2000 appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BJ Services Company for the year ended
September 30, 2000.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
December 18,  2000
<page>                                        EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.




By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name: 	 Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	 President

Date:	 March 31, 2005
Exhibit 10.3


 





SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK


	
         

        GEMINI MASTER FUND, LTD.,

         

        Plaintiff,

         

        -against-

         

        AETHLON MEDICAL, INC.,

         

        Defendant.

         
	
         

        Index No. 652358/2012

         

        STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

         

         



 


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by
and among the parties to the above-captioned action by their undersigned attorneys of record, that pursuant to CPLR § 3217(a)(2),
this action is hereby voluntarily discontinued with prejudice with each party to bear its own costs, no party hereto is an infant,
incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointed or conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject
matter of the action.


 


	Dated: February __, 2014	 	Dated: February __, 2014
	 	 	 
	FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP	 	OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP
	 	 	 
	By:	
		By:	

	 	Mark A. Robertson

666 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10103

(212) 318-3304

mark.robertson@nortonrosefulbright.com	 	 	Thomas J. Fleming (TF4423)

Park Avenue Tower

65 East 55th Street

New York, New York 10022

(212) 451-2300
	 	 	 	 	 
	Attorneys for Defendant	 	Attorneys for Plaintiff
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Fansteel Inc. as of September 30, 1998 and the
related consoldiated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Company's Form 10Q
filing for the period ended September 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       4,527,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,947,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                   322,692
<INVENTORY>                                 22,644,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,283,136
<PP&E>                                      69,749,945
<DEPRECIATION>                              50,000,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              95,718,682
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,572,400
<BONDS>                                      2,455,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,497,145
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,596,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                95,718,682
<SALES>                                    116,179,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           116,179,452
<CGS>                                       96,439,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              109,879,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (362,284)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,288
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,662,404
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,488,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,174,404
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,174,404
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
#### Martha COOK, Appellant, v. L. D. BOYETTE and Mary E. Boyette, husband and wife, Appellees.

No. M-155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 22, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 12, 1970.

Coe & Coe, Pensacola, for appellant.

Shell, Fleming, Davis & Menge, Pensacola, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal, briefs and oral argument herein having been fully considered, and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that the judgment appealed is erroneous, the said judgment is therefore

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Texas Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Texas Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 6:00 p.m. on Saturday, April 5, 1997, at the Townes 
Hall Auditorium, the University of Texas School of Law, 727 E. 26th 
Street, Room 2-114, Austin, Texas 78705. The purpose of the meeting is 
to hold a public consultation on affirmative action and admissions 
practices and policies in Texas institutions of higher education, post 
Hopwood v. Texas.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Adolph Canales, 
214-653-6779 or Philip Montez, Director of the Western Regional Office, 
213-894-3437 (TDD 213-894-3435). Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least five (5) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, February 14, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-4800 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Eugene A. VERRETT v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT.

No. 61753.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Eugene A. Verrett applying for Writ of Mandamus. Orleans Parish.

Granted; the clerk is ordered to present the attached application to the appropriate judge for a ruling, without further delay.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,456
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         336,721
<DEPRECIATION>                                 160,942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,188
<OTHER-SE>                                         446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,023
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,680
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,375
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  5,347
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,593
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.59
        

</TABLE>