alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32 Section 1350 Certification CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancWest Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Walter A. Dods, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: November 12, 2004  /s/Walter A. Dods, Jr.
Walter A. Dods, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit 32 Section 1350 Certification CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancWest Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Douglas C. Grigsby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: November 12, 2004  /s/ Douglas C. Grigsby
Douglas C. Grigsby
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), Howard R. Levine, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Kenneth T.
Smith, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 8, 2008                                                                              
|                                                                                                
|/s/ Howard R. Levine                                                                            
|Howard R. Levine Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                                                                
|/s/ Kenneth T. Smith                                                                            
|Kenneth T. Smith Senior Vice President 
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 10.38**

**2008 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation**

Cash Compensation:

Annual Retainer for Non-Employee Directors (other than Chairman): $20,000 

Annual Retainer for Non-Employee Chairman of the Board: $30,000 

Annual compensation for service as Chairman of the AuditCommittee: $7,500 

Compensation per Board Meeting Attended In Person: $1000 

Compensation per Board Meeting Attended by Telephone: $500 

Reimbursement of reasonable travel and lodging expensesincurred in connection with attendance at Board meetings. 

Equity Compensation (as provided in 2004 Director StockOption Plan, as amended): 

Initial Grant to Non-Employee Director: 10,000 shares of Common Stock 

Annual Grant to Non-Employee Directors: 3,000 shares of Common Stock
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

STANFORD ALLEN RUSSELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 72 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT JULY 19, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 10745 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 6 - 0 0 1 2 5 - CR- O RL- 1 9 - K RS U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s A N T H O N Y L E E D A V I S , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju l y 19, 2007) B efo re W IL S O N , P R Y O R an d C O X , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: J ohn E . F e rna nde z , appoi nt e d c ouns e l f orA nthony L e e D a vi s , ha s f i l e d a2

m ot i on t o w i thdr a w on appe a l s uppor t e d by abr i e f pr e pa r e d pur s ua ntt o A nde r s v. C a l i f orni a , 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 493 ( 1967) . O uri nde pe nde nt r e vi e w of

the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s tha tc ouns e l ’ s a s s e s s m e ntof the r e l a t i ve m e r i tof th e ap p e a l is c o rr e c t. B e c au s e in d e p e n d e n t e x a m in a tio n o f th e e n tir e r e c o r d r e v e a ls n o i ssu es o f arg u ab l e m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED a nd F ernand ez ’ s c on vi ct i on s a nd se nt ence s a re A FFI R M ED .
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO

2012 STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT

pursuant to

THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.

2011 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN

 

 

This Amendment to Stock Unit Agreement is dated as of and effective March 1, 2014 and is applicable to the Stock Unit Agreement (the “Agreement”) by and between The Ryland Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and                             (the “Executive”) dated as of March 1, 2012. Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to add a final paragraph to this Section as follows:

 

Upon the death, Disability or retirement (as defined by the Corporation, in its discretion) of a Participant, the full amount of the Award is immediately vested and payable to a Participant, or the Participant’s estate or beneficiary, on the first to occur of the Participant’s death, Disability, or six months following the Participant’s Separation from Service (coincident with or following the Company’s determination of retirement).  “Disability” shall mean a period during which a Participant (i) is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, (ii) is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three (3) months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Employer, or (iii) is determined to be totally disabled by the Social Security Administration.  “Separation from Service” shall mean the Participant’s “separation from service” within the meaning of Code section 409A, treating as a Separation from Service an anticipated permanent reduction in the level of bona fide services to be performed by the Participant to 20% or less of the average level of bona fide services performed by the Participant over the immediately preceding 36 month period (or the full period during which the Participant performed services for the Employer, if that is less than 36 months).

 

 

THE RYLAND GROUP, INC.

 

 

	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Robert   J. Cunnion, III
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Senior   Vice President, Human Resources
ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMM;~SION .
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES.
 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

Ardagh Group S.A., ) 

a public limited liability company, and ) DOCKET NO. 9356 

) 

Saint-Gobain Containers, Inc., ) 

a corporation, and ) 

) 

Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, ) 

a corporation, ) 

Respondents. ) 

) 

ORDER DESIGNATING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
 

Pursuant to authority vested in the Federal Trade Commission and delegated to 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

IT IS ORDERED that D. Michael Chappell, Chief Administrative Law Judge at 

this Commission, be, and hereby is, designated and appointed to take testimony and 

receive evidence in this proceeding and to perform all other duties authorized by law. 

ORDERED: :DM ~..,J 

D. Michael Chapp~ll 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: July 1, 2013
Pet Medications: Lessons 

from the FCLCA

FTC Pet Medications Workshop

October 2, 2012

James C. Cooper

Law & Economics Center and 

George Mason University School of Law
Did the Rx Release Affect 

Prices? Methodology

• Has the price gap between online and offline prices 

changed between Fall 2004 and Spring 2007?

• Data for prices of most popular lenses from most online 

firms and sample of Northern Virginia ECPs from a 

variety of retail settings (independent, chain, big box, 

mass merchandizer).

• Controlled for lens-specific effects, costs, and time 

effects.

• Errors clustered by store to control for idiosyncratic 

store pricing strategies correlated across lenses.

October 2, 2012 FTC Pet Medications Workshop

2
Did the Rx Release Affect 

Prices? Results

• Average difference in price gap is statistically 

indistinguishable from zero.

• On average, optical chains have raised their 

prices relative to online prices.

• Some evidence that warehouse clubs have 

lowered their prices relative to online prices. 

• Market shares have remained stable.

• Offline price dispersion has remained constant. 

October 2, 2012 FTC Pet Medications Workshop

3
Limited Distribution Strategies

• FTC Contact Lens Report and Cooper 

(2007) examine price differences between 

limited distribution lenses and others.

• Controlled for lens quality and store 

differences. 

• No statistically significant difference in 

price.

October 2, 2012 FTC Pet Medications Workshop

4
Some Things to Consider

• Ordered search? 

• Because search is expensive, consumers may choose 

to buy from prescriber just to economize on search 

costs.

• This could explain ECP premiums. 

• Limited distribution: 

• Empirical literature suggests that privately-imposed 

vertical restraints not likely to raise competitive issues 

(Cooper et al. 2005, LaFontaine & Slade 2008). 

• Antitrust laws treat vertical restraints under the rule of 

reason.

• Distinction between horizontal and vertical restraints.

October 2, 2012 FTC Pet Medications Workshop

5
**Exhibit 10.3**

 

PROMISSORY NOTE

 

(this “Note”)

 

| $15,000,000.00 | Houston, Texas | February 13, 2009 |
|----------------|----------------|-------------------|

 

FOR VALUE RECEIVED and WITHOUT GRACE (except to the extent, if any, provided in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement referred to hereinafter), the undersigned (“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of Texas Capital Bank, N.A. (“Payee”), at the Principal Office (as such term is defined in the Credit Agreement referred to hereinafter) of Payee, FIFTEEN MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($15,000,000.00) or so much thereof as may be advanced against this Note and remains unpaid pursuant to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated February 13, 2009 by and between Maker and Payee (as amended, supplemented, restated or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), together with interest at the rates and calculated as provided in the Credit Agreement.

 

Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement for matters governed thereby, including, without limitation, certain events which will entitle the holder hereof to accelerate the maturity of all amounts due hereunder.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Note shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the Credit Agreement.

 

This Note is issued pursuant to, is the “Note” under, and is payable as provided in the Credit Agreement.  Subject to compliance with applicable provisions of the Credit Agreement.  Maker may at any time pay the full amount or any part of this Note without the payment of any premium or fee, but such payment shall not, until this Note is fully paid and satisfied, excuse the payment as it become due of any payment on this Note provided for in the Credit Agreement.

 

This Note represents, in part, a renewal, but not a novation or discharge, of all or a portion of the Indebtedness of Maker previously evidenced by the Promissory Note or Promissory Notes issued by Maker pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement.

 

|   | Without being limited thereto or thereby, this Note is secured by the Security Documents. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

THIS NOTE SHALL BE GOVERNED AND CONTROLLED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO PRINCIPLES THEREOF RELATING TO CONFLICTS OF LAW.

 

|   | ROYALE ENERGY, INC.

 

 

By: ____________________________________ |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Stephen M. Hosmer

Chief Financial Officer                                    |
|        |                                                                               |  |
#### In the Matter of Jesus B. Quinones, Appellant, v New York City Board of Education et al., Respondents.

[738 NYS2d 582]

In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent New York City Board of Education dated June 27, 1995, terminating the petitioner’s employment, and an action, among other things, to recover damages for wrongful termination of the petitioner’s employment by the respondent New York City Board of Education and for breach of the duty of fair representation against the respondent Sandra Feldman, as President of the United Federation of Teachers, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bruno, J.), dated September 14, 2000, which denied his motion to vacate an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court (Greenstein, J.), entered March 17, 1997, which inter alia, dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied his motion to vacate the order and judgment which, inter alia, dismissed the proceeding. The petitioner *451failed to show the existence of newly-discovered evidence that would have changed the result in this case. Moreover, he has not established that the respondents obtained the judgment through any fraud or misrepresentation. Thus, the motion was properly denied *(see,*CPLR 5015 [a] [2], [3]; *Glicksman v Board of Educ. / Cent. School Bd. of Comsewogue Union Free School Dist.,*278 AD2d 364).

In light of this determination, we need not reach the petitioner’s remaining contentions. Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  WindsorTech,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Edward L. Cummings, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and


         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: November 4, 2002                                /s/ Edward L. Cummings
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Edward L. Cummings
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
-82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲ 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/27

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 27 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12252]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: June 7, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
June 4, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 62 to Competitive Product 
List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018-158, 
CP2018-228.

Elizabeth Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-12252 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Charlie B. ROACH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-661.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 16, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7657 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 with respect to 

anadromous fish habitat and passage, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2020 

Ms. SCHRIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 

with respect to anadromous fish habitat and passage, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FOR 

4 ANADROMOUS FISH. 

5 (a) ANADROMOUS FISH HABITAT AND PASSAGE.— 

6 Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 

7 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7657 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(3) ANADROMOUS FISH HABITAT AND PAS4 SAGE.— 

5 ‘‘(A) MEASURES.—A project under this 

6 section may include measures to improve habi7 tat or passage for anadromous fish, including— 

8 ‘‘(i) installing fish bypass structures 

9 on small water diversions; 

10 ‘‘(ii) modifying tide gates; and 

11 ‘‘(iii) restoring or reconnecting 

12 floodplains and wetlands that are impor13 tant for anadromous fish habitat or pas14 sage. 

15 ‘‘(B) BENEFITS.—A project that includes 

16 measures under this paragraph shall be formu17 lated to maximize benefits for the anadromous 

18 fish species benefitted by the project.’’; and 

19 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(g) PRIORITIZATION.—The Secretary shall give 

21 projects that include measures described in subsection 

22 (a)(3) equal priority for implementation as other projects 

23 under this section.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS