alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 776 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 776

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Medical Services for 
Children Program Reauthorization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1910(d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300w-
9(d)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2014, and'' and inserting ``2014,''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        $22,334,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 776

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the Emergency 
                 Medical Services for Children program.
```
# FILED
January 13, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON OCTOBER SESSION, 1997

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) No. 02C01-9610-CR-00369 Appellee ) ) SHELBY COUNTY vs. ) ) Hon. Arthur T. Bennett, Judge DONALD P. SPICER, ) ) (Rape of a child; assault) Appellant )
DISSENTING OPINION
I respectfully dissent. While I concur with the majority in concluding "that the court below erred in granting the State's moti on to consolidate," I find the err or complained of to be of such prejudici al dimensions as to requi re reversal. The facts of this case are analogous to the facts in State v. Ho yt , 928 S.W.2d 935 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995). In Hoyt , 928 S.W.2d at 945, this court condemned the practi ce of joining two open-dated indictments involvi ng two different victi ms for a single trial. As in Hoyt , the open-dated indictments in the present case, i.e., “Jul y 1, 1993 to December 31, 1993" and “March 1, 1994 to March 4, 1994, ” permit the State’s introduction of other unindicted sexual crimes or bad ac ts by the appellant in it s consolidated case-in-chi ef upon the trial of the other. See Hoyt , 928 S.W.2d at 945 (citing State v. Rickman , 876 S.W.2d 824, 82 9 (Tenn. 1994)). “Because there are two counts involving two different vi ctims , evidence of multiple sex ual offenses would be admissible under each count.” Hoyt , 928 S.W.2d at 945.

The rule of Hoyt clearly illu strates wh y these ind ictment s should n ot have been consolidated. In the present case, both victims testified to a multitude of sexual encounters, assaults and penetrations occurri ng both within the indicted period and outside the indicted period. It i s difficult to believe that L. A.S.’s testimony that “[it happened] every week” and that “[it happe ned] more than one time” had no2

prejudicial effect upon the jury verdict regarding A.N.S. Likewise, it is also inconceivable to imagi ne that A.N.S.’s testimony that “[it happened] [s]o many [times] I can’t count” had no effect r egarding the count inv

olving L.A.S. In other words, “[t]he ‘taint’

of such evidence introduced un der one count would bolster the second joined offense and vice versa.” Hoyt , 928 S.W.2d at 945. “Failure to sever, under these circumstances, invite[s] reliance upon the propensity notion. ” Id . at 946. I find that the appellant w as unduly prejudiced by the joinder of these offenses.

For these reasons, I wo uld vacate the conviction for rape of a child and remand for a new trial.

____________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Jud ge
Order entered April 20, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 01508 - CV SUSAN C. SERVIN, Appellant

V. STEVE SERVIN, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 15 - 02365 - E



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee Steve Servin’s unopposed motion for an extension of time in which to file appellee’s brief
. The motion is GRANTED . A ppellee’s brief is due on or before April 26, 2016
. /s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS PRESIDIN G JUSTICE
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7600 

To expand the scope of the Department of Veterans Affairs open burn 

pit registry. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2020 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself, Mr. HUDSON, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To expand the scope of the Department of Veterans Affairs 

open burn pit registry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF SCOPE OF DEPARTMENT OF 

4 VETERANS AFFAIRS OPEN BURN PIT REG5 ISTRY TO INCLUDE OPEN BURN PITS IN 

6 EGYPT AND SYRIA. 

7 Section 201(c)(2) of the Dignified Burial and Other 

8 Veterans’ Benefits Improvement Act of 2012 (Public Law 

9 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 527 note) is amended, in the matter 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7600 IH

1 before subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or Iraq’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘, Iraq, Egypt, or Syria’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leo CUMMINGS v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute.

No. 61071.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Leo Cummings applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Ouachita.

Writ granted in part. It is ordered that the trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing as to whether relator voluntarily and intelligently waived his right of appeal.

SUMMERS, J., dissents.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-64; RM-9001]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Lexington, IL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Atlantis Broadcasting Co., L.L.C., proposing the allotment of Channel 
258A at Lexington, Illinois, as the community's first local aural 
transmission service. Channel 258A can be allotted to Lexington in 
compliance with the Commission's minimum distance separation 
requirements with a site restriction of 8.1 kilometers (5.1 miles) 
southwest to avoid short-spacings to the licensed sites of Station 
WAJK(FM), Channel 257B1, LaSalle, Illinois, and Station WUSN(FM), 
Channel 258B, Chicago, Illinois. The coordinates for Channel 258A at 
Lexington are North Latitude 40-35-15 and West Longitude 88-50-39.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 7, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 22, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: James 
K. Edmundson, Esq., Gardner, Carton & Douglas, 1301 K Street, NW., 
Suite 900, East Tower, Washington, DC 20005 (Counsel for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-64, adopted February 
7, 1997, and released February 14, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-4299 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Exhibit 99

 

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of A.T. Cross Company, a Rhode Island corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 759 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 759

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2019

 Mr. Babin (for himself, Mr. Hurd of Texas, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Weber of 
 Texas, Mr. Gonzalez of Texas, Mr. Vela, Mr. Gallego, Mr. Gibbs, Miss 
    Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Austin Scott of 
   Georgia, Mr. Young, Mr. Cuellar, and Mr. Peterson) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-
Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair Opportunity Settlement Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of 
Texas Restoration Act (Public Law 100-89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude or limit the 
applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 
seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7460 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 18, 2020 

Received 

AN ACT 

To extend the authority for the establishment by the Peace 

Corps Commemorative Foundation of a commemorative 

work to commemorate the mission of the Peace Corps 

and the ideals on which the Peace Corps was founded, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 7460 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Corps Com3 memorative Work Extension Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT 

5 OF COMMEMORATIVE WORK TO COMMEMO6 RATE THE MISSION OF THE PEACE CORPS 

7 AND THE IDEALS ON WHICH THE PEACE 

8 CORPS WAS FOUNDED. 

9 Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United 

10 States Code, the authority to establish the commemorative 

11 work under section 1(a) of Public Law 113–78 (40 U.S.C. 

12 8903 note; 128 Stat. 647) shall continue to apply through 

13 January 24, 2028. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Ervin Joseph LOUIS v. Hon. Edward A. DELAHOUSSAYE, Judge, Sixteenth Judicial District Court.

No. 61127.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 14, 1977.

In re: Ervin Joseph Louis applying for writ of mandamus. St. Mary Parish.

Considering the response of the trial judge that he will rule immediately, the application is denied.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-6-003]

Trunkline Gas Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 18, 1997, Trunkline Gas Company 
(Trunkline) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First 
Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to be effective April 
1, 1997:

Sub Original Sheet No. 242A

    Trunkline asserts that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's Order No. 587-B, Standards for Business Practices of 
Interstate Natural Gas Pipelines issued on January 30, 1997 in Docket 
No. RM96-1-003 by incorporating by reference into its Tariff the 
Electronic Delivery Mechanism Standards promulgated by the Gas Industry 
Standards Board and adopted by the Commission in Order No. 587-B.
    Trunkline states that copies of this filing are being served on all 
affected customers, applicable state regulatory agencies and parties to 
this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rule and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before March 11, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4817 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Rayfield BYRD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-586.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 3, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6000

ANTHONY Q. KELLY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

Mr. STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary of Maryland Department of Public Safety 

and Correctional Services; STATE OF MARYLAND; FRANK B. BISHOP, JR., 

Warden; RICHARD S. RODERICK, Case Management Manager,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:16-cv-04143-RDB)

Submitted: November 13, 2018 Decided: November 21, 2018

Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Kelly v. Moyer, No. 1:16-cv-04143-RDB (D. Md. Aug. 14 & Nov. 9, 

2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         948,261
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          13,186
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               110,351
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                72,559
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,111,159
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         805,915
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           810,481
<LOANS>                                     11,498,320
<ALLOWANCE>                                    180,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,427,949
<DEPOSITS>                                  13,025,962
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,099,847
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            402,284
<LONG-TERM>                                    386,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       265,328
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,248,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              17,427,949
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                704,685
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              200,591
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 8,136
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               913,412
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             338,003
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             422,383
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          491,029
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,625
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               2,871
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                498,644
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                275,351
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     275,351
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   174,409
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.29
<LOANS-NON>                                     42,214
<LOANS-PAST>                                    32,323
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 69,061
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               185,470
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   39,005
<RECOVERIES>                                    20,272
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              180,362
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           114,159
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         66,203
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO.
1


 


to


 


EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
AGREEMENT


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT dated as of March 10, 2014 (the “Amendment”) by and between Alan Johnson
(the “Executive”) and Eventure Interactive, Inc. (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company entered into an Employment Services Agreement with the Executive as of November 21, 2012 (the “Employment Services
Agreement”) pursuant to which Executive serves as the Company’s President; and


 


WHEREAS,
Executive and the Company wish to modify certain arrangements under the Employment Services Agreement in the manner set forth herein.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1.              Section
1 of the Employment Services Agreement is amended to read as follows:


 


“1.          Employment
Period. The term of the Executive’s employment by the Company pursuant to this Agreement (the “Employment Period”)
shall commence upon the date hereof (the “Effective Date”) and shall continue for that period of calendar months from
the Effective Date as set forth on Schedule A hereto. Thereafter, the Employment Period shall automatically renew for successive
periods of three (3) years each, unless either party shall have given to the other at least thirty (30) days’ prior written
notice of their intention not to renew the Executive’s employment prior to the end of the Employment Period or the then applicable
renewal term, as the case may be. In any event, the Employment Period may be terminated as provided herein.”


 


2.              Section
4 of Schedule A of the Employment Services Agreement is amended to read as follows:


 


“4.          Annual
Bonus (paid quarterly): 100% of Base Salary, paid quarterly upon achievement of Milestones set by the Board of Directors during
each year of the Employment Period.”


 


3.          Executive
shall be entitled to receive 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock upon execution of this Amendment.


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


4.              No
Further Changes.  Until the resignation of Executive, all other terms of the Employment Services Agreement shall
continue with full force and effect.


 


[Signature
Page Follows]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


 


	EXECUTIVE:	 	COMPANY:
	 	 	 
	/s/ Alan Johnson	 	By:	/s/ Gannon K. Giguiere
	Alan Johnson	 	Name:  Gannon K. Giguiere
	 	 	Title:  Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 12 (Friday, January 17, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 3182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01006]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, January 23, 2014, 10 a.m.-12 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public

Matter To Be Considered:  Briefing Matter: Section 1101 update (6(b)) 
NPR
    A live Webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 14, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-01006 Filed 1-15-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Chester WILLIAMS v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 60625.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 1977.

In re: Chester Williams applying for mandamus and remedial writs of certiorari.

Application denied as moot. Applicant’s conviction was affirmed on appeal May 25, 1977.