8266 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 1997 / Notices

Village, Goodhart, and Cross Village, all

located in Emmet County, MI.

Morphological evidence indicates this

individual is Native American, based on

the brachialcephalic formation of the

occipital region of the skull. The areas

of Cross Village, Gathered, and Middle

Village are historic Odawa settlements,

and the types of unassociated funerary

objects are consistent with Odawa

burials of the late seventeenth and

eighteenth centuries. Consultation

evidence presented by the Grand

Traverse Bay Band of Chippewa and

Ottawa Indians and the Little Traverse

Bay Band of Odawa Indians supports

the Odawa affiliation for these sites.

Based on the above mentioned

information, officials of the Museum of

Anthropology have determined that,

pursuant to 43 CFR 10.2 (d)(1), the

human remains listed above represent

the physical remains of one individual

of Native American ancestry. Officials of

the Museum of Anthropology have

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.

3001 (3)(B), these 510 cultural items are

reasonably believed to have been placed

with or near individual human remains

at the time of death or later as part of

the death rite or ceremony and are

believed, by a preponderance of the

evidence, to have been removed from a

specific burial site of an Native

American individual. Lastly, officials of

the Museum of Anthropology have

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.

3001 (2), there is a relationship of

shared group identity which can be

reasonably traced between these Native

American human remains and

associated funerary objects and the

Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa

Indians.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Grand Traverse Bay Band of

Chippewa and Ottawa Indians and the

Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa

Indians. Representatives of any other

Indian tribe that believes itself to be

culturally affiliated with these human

remains and associated funerary objects

should contact David Kennedy,

Collections Manager, Museum of

Anthropology, University of Michigan,

Ann Arbor, MI 48901; telephone: (313)

764–0485 before March 26, 1997.

Repatriation of the human remains and

associated funerary objects to the Little

Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians

may begin after that date if no

additional claimants come forward.

Dated: February 18, 1997.

Francis P. McManamon,

Departmental Consulting Archeologist,

Manager, Archeology and Ethnography

Program.

[FR Doc. 97–4469 Filed 2–21–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

Bureau of Reclamation

Bay-Delta Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Bay-Delta Advisory

Council (BDAC) will meet to discuss

several issues including: a review of the

Phase II schedule; an overview of the

storage and conveyance component; an

overview of the ecosystem restoration

component; an update on restoration

coordination activities; an update on

activities resulting from the recent

flooding; and an update of progress on

the water use efficiency component. The

BDAC meeting is open to the public.

Interested persons may make oral

statements to the BDAC or may file

written statements for consideration.

DATES: The Bay-Delta Advisory Council

meeting will be held from 9:30 am to

5:00 pm on Wednesday, March 12,

1997.

ADDRESSES: The Bay-Delta Advisory

Council meeting will meet at the

Beverly Garland Hotel, 1780 Tribute

Road (at Exposition Boulevard/West),

Sacramento, CA.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION: For the BDAC meeting,

contact Sharon Gross, CALFED BayDelta Program, at (916) 657–2666. If

reasonable accommodation is needed

due to a disability, please contact the

Equal Employment Opportunity Office

at (916) 653–6952 or TDD (916) 653–

6934 at least one week prior to the

meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The San

Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin

Delta Estuary (Bay-Delta system) is a

critically important part of California’s

natural environment and economy. In

recognition of the serious problems

facing the region and the complex

resource management decisions that

must be made, the state of California

and the Federal government are working

together to stabilize, protect, restore,

and enhance the Bay-Delta system. The

State and Federal agencies with

management and regulatory

responsibilities in the Bay-Delta system

are working together as CALFED to

provide policy direction and oversight

for the process.

One area of Bay-Delta management

includes the establishment of a joint

State-Federal process to develop longterm solutions to problems in the BayDelta system related to fish and wildlife,

water supply reliability, natural

disasters, and water quality. The intent

is to develop a comprehensive and

balanced plan which addresses all of the

resource problems. This effort, the

CALFED Bay-Delta Program (Program),

is being carried out under the policy

direction of CALFED. The CALFED BayDelta Program is exploring and

developing a long-term solution for a

cooperative planning process that will

determine the most appropriate strategy

and actions necessary to improve water

quality, restore health to the Bay-Delta

ecosystem, provide for a variety of

beneficial uses, and minimize Bay-Delta

system vulnerability. A group of citizen

advisors representing California’s

agricultural, environmental, urban,

business, fishing, and other interests

who have a stake in finding long term

solutions for the problems affecting the

Bay-Delta system has been chartered

under the Federal Advisory Committee

Act (FACA) as the Bay-Delta Advisory

Council (BDAC) to advise CALFED on

the program mission, problems to be

addressed, and objectives for the

CALFED Bay-Delta Program. BDAC

provides a forum to help ensure public

participation, and will review reports

and other materials prepared by

CALFED staff.

Minutes of the meeting will be

maintained by the CALFED the BayDelta Program, Suite 1155, 1416 Ninth

Street, Sacramento, CA 95814, and will

be available for public inspection during

regular business hours, Monday through

Friday within 30 days following the

meeting.

Dated: February 18, 1997.

Roger Patterson,

Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 97–4451 Filed 2–21–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–94–M

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

COOPERATION AGENCY

Agency for International Development

Voluntary Foreign Aid Advisory

Committee; Meeting

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, notice is hereby given of

a meeting of the Advisory Committee on

Voluntary Foreign Aid (ACVFA).
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 1997 / Notices 8267

Date: March 12, 1997 (9:00 a.m. to

5:00 p.m.).

Location: State Department, Loy

Henderson Auditorium, 23rd Street

Entrance.

The purpose of the meeting is to

discuss an ACVFA Study on the State of

the USAID/PVO Partnership.

The meeting is free and open to the

public. However, notification by noon,

March 11, 1997, through the Advisory

Committee Headquarters is required.

Persons wishing to attend the meeting

must call Lisa J. Douglas (703) 351–0243

or Susan Saragi (703) 351–0244 or FAX

(703) 351–0228/0212. Persons attending

must include their name, organization,

birthdate and social security number for

security purposes.

Dated: January 29, 1997.

Adele Liskov,

Acting Director, Office of Private and

Voluntary Cooperation, Bureau for

Humanitarian Response.

[FR Doc. 97–4380 Filed 2–21–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6116–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

State of Oregon, et al. v. Jeff Mulkey,

et al., No. 97–234MA District of Oregon,

Filed February 11, 1997

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,

15 U.S.C. § 16 (b)–(h), that a proposed

Final Judgment, Stipulation and

Competitive Impact Statement have

been filed with the United States

District Court for the District of Oregon

in the above-captioned case.

On February 11, 1997 the United

States jointly filed with the states of

Oregon, California and Washington a

complaint to prevent and restrain the

defendants from violating Section 1 of

the Sherman Act. The Complaint alleges

that in late 1995 and early 1996 the

defendant commercial crab fishermen

were leaders in a conspiracy with

unnamed co-conspirators to restrain

competition among commercial crab

fishermen in violation of § 1 of the

Sherman Act. The conspiracy consisted

of an agreement and concert of action

between the defendants and coconspirators to fix the price at which

they would sell their catch to

purchasers at a minimum of $1.25 per

pound and to eliminate competition

among commercial fishermen in the sale

of crab. As a result of the conspiracy,

the vast majority of west coast

commercial crab fishermen did not fish

for crab during December 1995.

The proposed Final Judgment enjoins

the defendants from participating in any

discussion, communication or

agreement, except as members of a

fishermen’s marketing association

formed pursuant to the Fishermen’s

Collective Marketing Act (15 U.S.C.

§ 521) or similar state statutes, with

other fishermen, regarding the price or

sales terms to be negotiated with

purchasers, or refraining from fishing

while commercial fishermen are

negotiating price with purchasers. The

defendants are also enjoined from any

interference with any other commercial

fisherman’s business through threats or

other means of intimidation.

Public comment is invited within the

statutory 60-day period. Such comments

will be published in the Federal

Register and filed with the Court.

Comments should be addressed to

Christopher S. Crook, Acting Chief, San

Francisco Office, U.S. Department of

Justice, Antitrust Division, Box 36046,

460 Golden Gate Avenue, San

Francisco, California 94102 (telephone:

(415) 436–6660).

Rebecca P. Dick,

Deputy Director of Operations.

Hardy Myers,

Attorney General

Andrew E. Aubertine,

Assistant Attorney General, Oregon

Department of Justice, 1162 Court Street

NE, Salem, Oregon 97310, (503) 378–

4732, OSB #: 83013.

Liaison counsel for all plaintiffs identified

on attached signature pages.

In the United States District Court for

the District of Oregon

State of Oregon, ex rel., Attorney General

Hardy Myers, State of Washington, ex rel.,

Attorney General Christine O. Gregoire, State

of California, ex rel., Attorney General Daniel

Lungren, United States of America, Plaintiffs,

v. Jeff Mulkey, Jerry Hampel, Todd Whaley,

Brad Pettinger, Joseph Speir, Thomas

Timmer, Richard Sheldon, Dennis Sturgell,

Allen Gann and Russell Smotherman,

Defendants. Civil Action No. 97–234MA,

Stipulation—Judge Malcom Marsh.

Stipulation

It is stipulated by and between the

undersigned parties, and by their

respective attorneys, that:

(1) The parties consent that a final

judgment in the form hereto attached as

Exhibit A may be filed and entered by

the Court at any time after the

expiration of the sixty (60) day period

for public comment provided by the

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,

15 U.S.C. § 16 (b)–(h), without further

notice to any party or other proceedings,

either upon the motion of any party or

upon the Court’s own motion, provided

that plaintiff has not withdrawn its

consent as provided herein;

(2) The parties further consent that,

pending entry of the Consent Decree,

defendants shall be subject to and abide

by the terms of the injunction set forth

in the Consent Decree.

(3) The plaintiffs or any of them may

withdraw their consent hereto at any

time within said period of sixty (60)

days by serving notice thereof upon the

other party hereto and filing said notice

with the Court;

(4) In the event one or more plaintiffs

withdraw their consent hereto, this

stipulation shall be of no effect and

shall not be binding upon the

withdrawing plaintiff(s) in this or any

other proceeding, and the making of this

stipulation shall not in any manner

prejudice any consenting party to any

subsequent proceedings.

Respectfully submitted,

Dated this 6th day of February, 1997.

Hardy Myers,

Attorney General of Oregon.

Andrew E. Aubertine #83013,

Assistant Attorney General, Oregon

Department of Justice, 1162 Court Street, NE,

Salem, Oregon 97310, (503) 378–4732.

Dated this llll day of January, 1997.

Christine O. Gregoire,

Attorney General of Washington.

Marta Lowy #14430,

Assistant Attorney General.

Brian Dew #18877,

Assistant Attorney General, Office of the

Washington Attorney General, 900 4th

Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98164, (206)

464–6433.

Dated this 14th day of January, 1997.

Daniel Lungren,

Attorney General of California.

Lindsay Bower #69577,

Assistant Attorney General, California

Department of Justice, 50 Fremont Street,

Suite 300, San Francisco, CA 94105–2239,

(415) 356–6377.

Dated this llll day of December, 1996.

United States of America Department of

Justice, Antitrust Division

Richard Cohen WA#3671/CA79601,

Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice,

Antitrust Division, 450 Golden Gate Avenue,

San Francisco, CA 94102, (415) 436–6695.

Dated this llll day of December, 1996.

Thomas Triplett #65125,

Schwabe, Williamson, et al. 1600–1800

Pacwest Center, 1211 SW 5th Avenue,

Portland, OR 97204, (503) 796–2901.

Counsel for Defendants Jeff Mulkey and

Allen Gann

Dated this 30th day of December, 1996.

Michael Treman #063039 Cal.,

Attorney at Law, 1428 Chapala Street, Santa

Barbara, CA 93101, (805) 962–6544.

Counsel for Defendant Thomas Timmer