alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Farmer Bros. Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey A. Wahba, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 9, 2011



/s/ Jeffrey A. WahbaJeffrey A. WahbaTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
No. D-2242.

#### In re Disbarment of Freeman.

Robert A. Freeman, of Miami, Fla., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.3

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
our report dated March 10, 1994 included in the Form 10-KSB of SA
Holdings, Inc. (now known as SA Telecommunications, Inc.) for the
year ended December 31, 1993, and to all references to our firm
included in the Registration Statement.

                              /s/ King, Burns & Company, P.C.

                              KING, BURNS & COMPANY, P.C.

Dallas, Texas
March 5, 1996
#### Jean E. BRENNAN, Appellant, v. John A. BRENNAN, Appellee.

No. 70-295.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 13, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Donald NETTO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-640.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 25, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; Warren H. Edwards, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Errol BROOKS v. Charles R. WARD, Judge, et al.

No. 60977.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Errol Brooks, applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Granted and transferred to trial court with instructions to rule.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET, INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS APPEARING ON PAGE 6 OF FORM 10-Q FOR
NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   38,708,639
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  3,362,488
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       7,237,149
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,342,793
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,651,069
<COMMON>                                     1,834,445
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,440,511
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         11,576,051
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              14,851,007
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        13,500,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          11,200,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              12,100,062
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               51,651,069
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   41,353,963
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         1,999,920
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  36,389,151
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  38,389,071
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      2,964,892
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             606,497
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               3,571,389
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     1,575,656
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,995,733
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                4,426,791
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       6,604,103
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFarmer Bros. Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter endedDecember 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger M. Laverty III, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: February 5, 2009 |                                  |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                         |                                  |
|                         | /s/ Roger M. Laverty III              |
|                         |                                  |
|                         | Roger M. Laverty III                  |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 10657.

#### Hall *v.*Paxton.

Decided April 14, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton *412county.

*Miss Anne S. Hall,*in person, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Murray*Seasongood, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J:, Price, Crew, Summers. Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                           Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                               18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                As Adopted Pursuant to
                       Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Farmers Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martin D.
Feinstein, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Martin D. Feinstein
------------------------
Martin D. Feinstein
Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2003


This certification is being furnished to accompany this Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
#### Dora RESNICK, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 42927.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Aug. 3, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 19, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 266 So.2d *74.*

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ, concur.

ERVIN, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ, dissent.
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, R. James Kelly,President, Chief Operating Officer, and Interim Chief Financial Officer ofFamily Dollar Stores, Inc., (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

·                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 3,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 12,2007
| /s/ R. James Kelly                                                                                                |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|       R. James Kelly                                                                |   |   |
|       President and  Chief Operating Officer — Interim Chief Financial Officer |   |
|        (Principal  Financial Officer)                                          |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Family DollarStores, Inc., and will be retained by Family Dollar Stores, Inc., and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Karl J. Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/KARL J. SCHMIDTKarl J. Schmidt
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-6471

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

OTIS RICH, a/k/a O,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District 

Judge. (1:08-cr-00411-WDQ-5)

Submitted: July 26, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Otis Rich, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States 

Attorney, Michael Clayton Hanlon, George Jarrod Hazel, Assistant 

United States Attorneys, Mushtaq Zakir Gunja, Antonio J. 

Reynolds, Jason M. Weinstein, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Otis Rich seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Rich has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Rich’s motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### SERVED: October31, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

### DEPARTMENT OF

In The Matter Of: FELTS FIELD AVIATION Respondent 

### WASHINGTON DC 

### TRANSPORTATION ' ) ) ) ) ) 

## ZOib OCT 

## 32 A 

## q: 31 DOCKET OPERATIONS· DocketNo. FAA-2015-3307 Case No. 2015WP910090



### ORDERSETTING MOTION CONFERENCE

OnAugust 2, 2016, an Order Denying Respondent's Motionto Dismiss and for an Award ofAttorney Fees was filed. On September 16, 2016, the Respondent, Felts Field Aviation, filed the Respondent's Motionto Compel. On September 22, 2016, the FAA filed the Complainant's Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Compel. On September 30, 2016, the Respondent filed the Respondent's Reply to Complainant's Oppositionto Respondent's Motionto Compel. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205, and having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The parties shall appear by telephone onThursday,November 

### 10,2016, at 

### 1:30 p.m. Eastern time for a Motion Conference. The parties shall be preparedto present oral argument on, and answer questions regarding, the September 16, 2016 Respondent's Motionto Compel. The parties shall access the Conference by dialing 888-278-0296, and whenprompted, entering access code 5851842.2. Ifeitherparty needs clarification orhas any questions regarding the procedures contained inthis Order, contact Ms. Rachael Brown, Judicial StaffAssistant, atthe Office of Hearings (202-366-2132).

van**~m1:1·**listrative LawJudge Attachment: Service List

Page 2 of2DocketNo. FAA-2015-3307 (Civil Penalty Action)



### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Ms. Fatimah Stokley 

### Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Enforcement Division- Western Team P.O. Box 920007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7112 FPC(: 310-725-6816 

### Mr. Mark J. Conlin 

### Mr. Benjamin L. Wybomey 

### Respondent's Counsel Conlin, Maloney & Miller 421 W. Riverside Ave., Suite 911 Spokane, WA 99201 TEL: 509-624-3020 FPC(: 509-623-1650 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 Felts Field Aviation, Inc. 

### Respondent 14 EastMain Ave. Spokane, WA 99201-0405

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
The National Security
Group, Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Brian R. McLeod certify that:

| | 1. 
The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
2.  Information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2003

/s/ Brian R McLeod

---

Brian R. McLeod, CPAChief
Financial Officer

64
exhibit_10-1.htm










Exhibit 10.1


 







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-110652, 333-137102 and 333-153419) of Partner Communications Company Ltd., of our report dated March 9, 2014, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.


 



	
 Tel-Aviv, Israel  


March 9, 2014 

	/s/                                            

Kesselman & Kesselman


Certified Public Accountants (lsr.)


A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
#### HERNANDO COUNTY and Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Edward J. SANKNER and Jane F. Sankner, his wife, Respondents.

No. 44353.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 19, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed. 281 So.2d 396.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,846-01

IN RE JOSE RAUL GRANADOS, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 12-09-0208-CRA IN THE 218th DISTRICT COURT

FROM ATASCOSA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 218th District Court of Atascosa County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of

Atascosa County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such

habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Atascosa County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: September 23, 2015

Do not publish
#### BRUCE TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL, a Florida corporation, and Edward Odell Hannas, Petitioners, v. Maria DELGADO, a minor, by and through her mother and next friend, Procopio Delgado, and Procopio Delgado, Individually, Respondents.

No. 43689.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 20, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 556.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
RE : H uh t a m ak i Food se r

v i ce , I nc

- V O C sou r

ces? KEV IN J

. W ILLI A M S to: S tan l e y T ong 04 / 18 / 2012 11 : 53

AM

Stan,

So rr y f o r no t g e tt i n g ba ck t o y ou ri g h t a w a y

. H uh t a m a k i ( f o r m e rl y C h i ne t ) m a k e s
m o l ded f i be r p l a t e s

. VO C’ s a r e e m i tt ed f r o m pu l p i n g and m o l d i n g m a c h i nes

. T he r e i s
no c oa t i n g li ne.

U npe r m i tt ed e q u i p m en t i n c l ude s f l e x o g r aph i c and i n k j e t p ri n t i n g f o r p l a t e s and pa ck a g i n g , w ho s e e m i ss i on s a r e be l o w ou r pe r m i t t h r e s ho l ds

. T he s e ope r a t i on s t o g e t he r e m i t abou t 150 l b / y r.

T w o t h i n g s t o no t e : 1 ) f l e x o g r aph i c and i n k j e t p ri n t i n g a r e no t w i t h i n t he sc ope o f t he Pape r , F il m , and F o il C oa t i n g s C T G, and 2 ) t he C T G c u t o ff l e v e l i s 15 l b / da y a c t ua l VO C e m i ss i on s f r om a ll p a p er , f ilm a nd f o il c o a ti n g op era ti ons, i n c l ud i n g re l a t e d c l ea n i n g

ac ti v iti e s.

- K e v in

K e v i n J

. W illi a m s , P h

. D. P r o g r a m C oo r d i na t o r , R u l e D e v e l op m ent Sa c r a m en t o M e t r opo li t an A ir Q ua li t y M ana g e m en t Di s t ri ct k j w illi a m s @a ir q ua li t y

. o rg ( 916 ) 874

- 4851 ( 916 ) 874

- 4899 f ax

F ro m : S ta n l e y T o n g [m a il t o: T o ng

. S ta n l e y@ e p ama il. e p a .gov ] S e n t : W e d n e sd a y , A pril 18

, 2012 11:03 AM To : K EV I N J . WI LL I A MS Su b j e c t : F w : H uh tama k i F oods

e r v i c e , I nc - V O C so u r

c e s?

H i K e vi n,

J u s t f o ll o w i ng
- up on m y ea r li e r e m a il i f y ou ha v e an y i n f o on Huhta m a k i F ood s e r vi c e. T han k s.

S tan

S tan l e y T ong U. S

. EPA Reg i on IX Ru l e s O ff i c e ( A IR

- 4) 75 Ha w tho r ne S t. S an Fr an c i sc o, C A 94105

415

- 947

- 4122

- v o i ce 415

- 947

- 3579

- f ax

----- F or w arded b y St an l e y T ong / R9 / U SEPA/ U S on 04 / 18 / 2012 11 : 04 AM

-----F ro m : St an l e y T ong / R9 / U SEPA/ US

T o : k

j w illi a m s @ a i rqua li t y

. org
Da t e : 04 / 02 / 2012 03 : 44 PM
S ub j e ct: Huh t a m a k i F ood s er v i c e , I n c
- V O C s our c e s?

K e vi n,

I' m r e vi e w i ng S a cr a m ento' s 2008 R A C T S I P negat iv e de c l a r at i on f o r: EPA

- 453 / R- 07

- 003 C on t r o l T e c hn i q ue s G u i de li ne s f o r P ape r , F il m , and F o il C oa t i n g s

Can y ou te ll m e about Huhta m a k i F ood s e r vi c e' s V O C e m i ss i on s? C A R B ' s e m i ss i on i n v ento r y s ho w s 8.5 tp y - w hat V O C s ou rc e s a r e at Huhta m a k i that m a k e up the 8.5 tp y? T han k s.

Huhta m a k i F ood s e r vi c e Inc 8450 G er b er R d S acra m e n t o 95828

S tan

S tan l e y T ong U. S

. EPA Reg i on IX Ru l e s O ff i c e ( A IR

- 4) 75 Ha w tho r ne S t. S an Fr an c i sc o, C A 94105

415

- 947

- 4122

- v o i ce 415

- 947

- 3579

- f ax