alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S

O F T E X A S

NO. WR-92, 244-02

EX P ART E ALVI N DEJUAN M EL TON, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. CR25,897- B I N THE 20TH DI STRI CT COURT

F ROM M I LA M COUNT Y

P er cur iam

.

O P I N I O N

A ppl i can t was co n v i ct ed o f m

urder an d s en

t en ced t o t wen

t y -f i v e y ears ’ i

m pri s o n m en t

. He

f i l ed t h i s app l i c a t i o n f

o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus i n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i ct i o n

, an d t h e di s t ri ct cl erk

f o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

. C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07. A ppl i can t s eeks a l at e appeal

.

A f t er t h e j ury co n

v i ct ed A pp l i c a nt

, t r i a l co un s el s i gn ed an d f i l ed a n o t i ce o f appea l f

o r

A ppl i can t

, s o t ri al co un s el b eca

m e A ppl i can t ’ s appel l at e co un s el

. Melton v. State

, No

. 03-19- 00396-

CR (T ex

. A

pp. —A us t i n del

. Sep. 19, 2019); Jones v. State

, 98 S. W

. 3d 700, 703 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp.

2003). T h e appel l at e co urt di s m i s s ed t h e appea l f

o r wan t o f pro s ecut i o n b eca

us e A ppl i can t f ai l ed t o

pay o r arran ge t o pay t h e cl erk’ s f ee f o r prepari n g t h e cl erk’ s reco rd. Id. Co un s el co n cede s t h at t h e

cl erk’ s reco rd was n o t prepared f o r t h e appeal due t o h i s err o r.2

Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. J o n e s v

. S t a te

, s upr

a A ppl i can t m ay f i l e an o ut -o f

-t i m e appea l o f h i s

co n v i ct i o n i n caus e n um b er CR 25, 897 f ro m t h e 20t h Di s t ri ct Co urt o f M i l am Co u nt y

. W i t h i n t en

day s f ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s Co urt ’s m a nd a t e

, t h e t ri al co urt s h al l det erm i n e wh et h er A

ppl i can t i s

i n di gen t

. If A ppl i can t i s i n di gen t an d wan t s t o b e repr es en

t ed b y co un s el

, t h e t ri al co urt s h al l appo i n t

co un s el t o repr es en

t h i m o n di rect appea l

. A

ppl i can t m us t f i l e a wri t t en n o t i ce o f appea l i n t h e t ri al

co urt wi t h i n t h i rt y day s f ro m t h e dat e o f t h i s Co urt ’ s m an dat e.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d t h e Bo ard o f Pardo n s an d Paro l es

.

Del i v ered: J ul y 28, 2021

Do n o t pub l i s h
#### Nina Mae THREET v. Vickie KILGORE, a minor, by Jessie M. Kilgore, father and next friend.

No. 47020.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 19, 1973.

Brooks, Guyton & Shaw, Kosciusko, for appellant. Liston & Upshaw, Winona, J. E. Ellis, Jr., for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Marshall Perry, Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and INZER, SUGG, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1113 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1113 Filed 01/13/21 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1113 Filed 01/13/21 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1113 Filed 01/13/21 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the
Company) for the quarterly period ended May 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), Howard R. Levine, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Kenneth T.
Smith, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 8, 2009                               
|                                                 
|/s/ Howard R. Levine                             
|Howard R. Levine                                 
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)                    
|                                                 
|/s/ Kenneth T. Smith                             
|Kenneth T. Smith                                 
|Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer  
|(Principal Financial Officer)                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



26
#### Charles E. BRICK, Appellant, v. Nancy J. BRICK, Appellee.

No. 71-147.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1971.

George Ritchie, Cocoa, for appellant.

Kendall T. Moran, of Moran & Allender, Titusville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal must be and is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. There was no petition for rehearing addressed to the final judgment recorded on January 20, 1971. Although an amendment to the final judgment was filed January 29, 1971, it was clerical in nature only and did not affect any of the rights of the parties as determined in the final judgment. Hence, the time for taking an appeal from the final judgment was not affected. Betts v. Fowelin, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 630. The notice of appeal was filed February 23, 1971. This being more than 30 days after the rendition of the final judgment, this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and OWEN, JJ-, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                               MERIDIAN DATA, INC.
                             Financial Data Schedule
                           Article 5 of Regulation SX


This schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                         <C>
<CIK>                               0000864568
<NAME>                      Meridian Data, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                              1000
<CURRENCY>                          US dollars
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                  15,167
<SECURITIES>                            16,722
<RECEIVABLES>                            3,492
<ALLOWANCES>                               543
<INVENTORY>                              1,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        36,761
<PP&E>                                   1,861
<DEPRECIATION>                           1,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          37,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    7,406
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                66,216
<OTHER-SE>                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            30,085
<SALES>                                 19,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        19,968
<CGS>                                    9,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            9,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        20,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          7,778
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      7,778
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             7,778
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.86
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9179-9180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4991]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Armed Forces Epidemiological Board (AFEB)

AGENCY: Office of The Surgeon General.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 10(a) (2) of Public Law 92-463, The 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, this

[[Page 9180]]

announces the forthcoming AFEB Meeting. The meeting will be held from 
0800-1630, Thursday and Friday, April 10-11, 1997. The purpose of the 
meeting is to complete pending Board issues, introduce recruit 
training/medical issues, and to conduct an executive working session. 
The meeting location will be at the U.S. Marine Corps Base, Parris 
Island, Beaufort, South Carolina. The meeting will be open to the 
public, but limited by space accommodations. Any interested person may 
attend, appear before or file statements with the committee at the time 
and in the manner permitted by the committee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: COL Vicky Fogelman, AFEB Executive 
Secretary, Armed Forces Epidemiological Board, Skyline Six, 5109 
Leesburg Pike, Room 693, Falls Church, Virginia 22041-3258, (703) 681-
8012/3.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4991 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7620

KENNETH MICHAEL BOEKENOOGEN, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

R. DAVID MITCHELL, Supt.; THEODIS BECK, 

 Respondents - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:09-CV-00099-JAB-DPD) 

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kenneth Michael Boekenoogen, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe 

DelForge, III, Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorneys General, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Kenneth Michael Boekenoogen seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boekenoogen 

has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

Boekenoogen’s motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Income and Notes
to the consolidated financial statements on pages 2 through 10 of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,882
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40
<INVENTORY>                                      1,466
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,758
<PP&E>                                           6,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,232
<BONDS>                                          3,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        351
<COMMON>                                           779
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,090
<SALES>                                          6,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,428
<CGS>                                            5,033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    237
<INCOME-TAX>                                        89
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                146
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       146
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The EPS-PRIMARY amount represents Basic earnings per share and the
EPS-DILUTED amount represents Diluted earnings per share in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per
Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FarmerBros. Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Roger M. Laverty III, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 9, 2009

 
|   | /s/ Roger M. Laverty III              |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Roger M. Laverty III                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
KMC Wheel - Offset Calculations

Form Throughput Units EF AER 02/03 Throughput Units EF AER 01/02

PM emissions B4 2794 tons 4.3 12014.2 4983 tons 1.9 9467.7

PM emissions B1 60.35 mmcf 7.5 452.63 59.83 mmcf 7.5 448.73

SOx emissions B1 60.35 mmcf 0.83 50.09 59.83 mmcf 0.83 49.66

Notes: B1 is for NG usage. PM for non-combustion has been mulitpled by 50% to account for PM10 emissions.

AER 01/02 throughput reduced from 7900 to 4983, based on monthly throughput limit.

App 400236, Melting Furnace

Througput Fraction 0.374 0.374

NG Rating Fraction 0.232 0.232

PM10 (Throughput fractionX AER B4) 4491.76 3539.70

PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 105.06 104.15

PM10 Total (melting + combustion) 4596.82 3643.85

SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 11.63 11.53

App 400235, Melting Furnace AER 01/02 data not used 

Througput Fraction 0.626 0.626

NG Rating Fraction 0.435 0.435

PM10 (Throughput fractionX AER B4) 7522.44 5928.00

PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 196.99 195.29

PM10 Total (melting + combustion) 7719.42 6123.29

SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 21.80 21.61

App 302844, Heat Treating Furnace

NG Rating Fraction 0.145 0.145

PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 65.66 65.10

SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 7.27 7.20

App 302846, Heat Treating Furnace AER 01/02 data not used 

NG Rating Fraction 0.145 0.145

PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 65.66 65.10

SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 7.27 7.20

App 348664. Baking Oven, Paint AER 01/02 data not used 

NG Rating Fraction 0.043 0.043

PM10 (NG Rating fractionX AER B1) 19.26 19.09

SOx Total (NG rating fraction x AER B1) 2.13 2.11

Total PM 12,466.83 9,916.43

Average PM 11,191.63

Total SOx 50.09 49.66

Average SOx 49.88

Application No. Equipment

NG rating

mmbtu/hr

NG Rating 

Fraction

Throughput 

Limit

lb/month

Throughput

Fraction

400236 Al melting furance 4.8 0.232 310,500 0.374

400235 Al melting furance 9 0.435 520,000 0.626

302844 Heat treating furance 3 0.145 N/A N/A

302846 Heat treating furance 3 0.145 N/A N/A

348664 Baking oven, paint 0.88 0.043 N/A N/A

Total 20.68 1 830,500 1
Exhibit 31

Certification  (pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended)

I, Barry I. Regenstein certifying individual, certify that:

1.  I have  reviewed  the  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  Command  Security
Corporation;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the  registrant's'
auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.

Date: June 29, 2005

By:  /s/ Barry I. Regenstein
     --------------------
     Barry I. Regenstein
     Principal Executive Officer
# National Caribbean-American Heritage Month, 2018

During Caribbean-American Heritage Month, we honor America's long-shared history with our neighbors in the Caribbean and celebrate the Caribbean Americans who have enriched our Nation.

Caribbean Americans embody the American spirit, with their talents and hard work contributing greatly to America's economy. They protect our citizens as law enforcement officers, serve our communities as public officials, and mentor our country's young people as educators. Through their tremendous athleticism and determination, they have brought pride to the hearts of the American people as members of numerous U.S. Olympic teams. Their leadership and resolve have made incredible contributions to our society.

As trailblazers, Americans with Caribbean roots have sewn their own unique thread into the fabric of our Nation. Dr. William Thornton, a native of the British Virgin Islands, designed the United States Capitol and is generally considered the first “Architect of the Capitol”. Jean Baptiste du Sable, the first permanent resident of Chicago, was born in Haiti. Widely recognized as the “Founder of Chicago,” his prosperous trade settlement has become one of the most iconic cities in the world.

This month, we acknowledge the numerous contributions of Caribbean Americans to our Nation, including those of the more than 4 million Caribbean Americans who live in the United States today. We are also deeply grateful to the many Caribbean Americans who have served or are currently serving our country as members of our Armed Forces.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2018 as National Caribbean-American Heritage Month. I encourage all Americans to join in celebrating the history, culture, and achievements of Caribbean Americans with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eighteen, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-second.

[FR Doc. 2018-12152

Billing code 3295-F8-P
#### Andrew HUGGINS v. STATE.

No. 37857.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 203 So.2d 371.