alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

February 11, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    SPECIAL REQUEST: In order to begin the survey described below 
during the April-May 1997, the Department of the Treasury is requesting 
that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve this 
information collection by February 24, 1997. To obtain a copy of this 
survey, please contact the IRS Clearance Officer at the address listed 
below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1349.
    Project Number: SOI-25.
    Type of Review: Revision.
    Title: 1997 First Quarter Form 941 TeleFile System Customer 
Satisfaction Survey.
    Description: The survey requests information about satisfaction and 
whether the business filer would be willing to use the TeleFile system 
again. Data collected during the surveys will only be used to make 
recommendations and improvements to the Transcript application.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,275.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 1 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Other.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 38 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4439 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 21

OXFORD HEALTH PLANS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|                          |                                           |                               |             |             |  | 
|------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------- | ----------- |  | 
|                          |                                           |                               |             | State of   
|Company                   |                                           | Incorporation                
|                          |                                           |                              
|Oxford Health Plans, Inc. |                                           | Delaware                     
|                          | Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc.            |                               | New York   
|                          |                                           | Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. |             | New York   
|                          | Oxford Health Plans (NJ), Inc.            |                               | New Jersey 
|                          | Oxford Health Plans (CT), Inc.            |                               | Connecticut
|                          | Investors Guaranty Life Insurance Company |                               | California 
|                          | MedSpan, Inc.                             |                               | Delaware   
|                          |                                           | MedSpan Health Options, Inc.  |             | Connecticut
**Exhibit 21**

 

Subsidiaries.

 

**THQ Inc.**

 
| **Entity  Name**                       |   | **Jurisdiction** |
|----------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
|                                   |   |             |
| Genetic  Anomalies, Inc.               |   | Delaware         |
| Pacific  Coast Power and Light Company |   | California       |
| Rainbow  Multimedia Group, Inc.        |   | Delaware         |
| THQ Asia  Pacific Pty. Ltd.            |   | Australia        |
| THQ  Australia Studios Pty Ltd         |   | Australia        |
| THQ  Deutschland GmbH                  |   | Germany          |
| THQ  Entertainment GmbH                |   | Germany          |
| THQ France  SARL.                      |   | France           |
| THQ  (Holdings) Ltd.                   |   | United  Kingdom  |
| THQ  International Ltd.                |   | United  Kingdom  |
| THQ  International Operations Ltd.     |   | United  Kingdom  |
| THQ Korea  Ltd.                        |   | Korea            |
| THQ Wireless  Inc.                     |   | Delaware         |
| THQ Wireless  Inc.                     |   | Cayman  Islands  |
| THQ Wireless  International Sarl       |   | Luxembourg       |
| Volition,  Inc.                        |   | Delaware         |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.33-37556, No. 33-93896 and No. 33-31813 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 29, 2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Wet Seal, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphrelating to the restatement described in Note 2) and of our report on internal control over financial reporting dated April 29, 2005 (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting because of material weaknesses) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Wet Seal, Inc. for the year ended January 29, 2005. 

 

Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Costa Mesa, California 

April 29, 2005
<PAGE> 1


EXHIBIT 11.1 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS 

FEDERAL-MOGUL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



        FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED                  PRIMARY         FULLY DILUTED
                                                 --------------    --------------- 
              SEPTEMBER 30                        1997    1996      1997     1996
------------------------------------------       ------  ------    ------   ------

<S>
EARNINGS:  (In Millions)
                                                 <C>     <C>       <C>      <C>
  Net earnings                                   $ 17.4  $(12.6)   $ 17.4   $(12.6)
  Series C preferred dividend requirements          (.6)    (.6)               (.6)
  Series D preferred dividend requirements <F1>            (1.6)              (1.6)
  Additional required ESOP contribution <F2>                          (.5)
                                                  -----   -----     -----    -----
  Net earnings available for common 
    and equivalent shares                        $ 16.8  $(14.8)   $ 16.9   $(14.8)
                                                  =====   =====     =====    =====

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:  (In Millions)

  Common shares outstanding                        37.1    35.1      37.1     35.1
  Dilutive stock options outstanding                 .4                .4
  Conversion of Series C preferred stock <F3>                         1.6
  Conversion of Series D preferred stock <F4>                         2.9
                                                  -----   -----     -----    -----
  Common and equivalent shares outstanding         37.5    35.1      42.0     35.1
                                                  =====   =====     =====    =====

PER COMMON AND EQUIVALENT SHARE:

   Net earnings                                  $  .45  $ (.41)   $  .40   $ (.41)
                                                  =====   =====     =====    =====

</TABLE>

[FN]
<F1> In August 1997, the Series D preferred stock was converted into common 
     stock, and no dividend was paid for the three-month period ended 
     September 30, 1997.  

<F2> Amount represents the additional after-tax contribution that would be 
     necessary to meet the ESOP debt service requirements under an assumed 
     conversion of the Series C preferred stock.

<F3> Amount represents the weighted average number of common shares issued 
     assuming conversion of preferred stock outstanding.

<F4> Amount represents the weighted average number of shares not included in 
     the number of weighted-average common shares outstanding to reflect the 
     4.4 million shares converted.  
</FN>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1670

ENRIQUE ALEXANDER HERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 11, 2019 Decided: March 28, 2019

Before WILKINSON and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and DUNCAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph A. Devamithran, LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH A. DEVAMITHRAN, Annandale, 

Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Paul 

Fiorino, Senior Litigation Counsel, Timothy Bo Stanton, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Enrique Alexander Hernandez Rodriguez (Rodriguez), a native and citizen of El 

Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals 

dismissing Rodriguez’s appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications 

for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We 

have reviewed the arguments pressed by Rodriguez in conjunction with the certified 

administrative record, including the transcript of the merits hearing and all supporting 

evidence, and the relevant legal authorities. Despite Rodriguez’s assertions to the 

contrary, we conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any 

of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that 

substantial evidence “on the record considered as a whole” supports the denial of relief in 

this case, INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992) (internal quotation marks 

omitted). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re Rodriguez (B.I.A. May 15, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF I. L. AND A. E., 

MINOR CHILDREN,

 

 Appellant,

.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00016-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2018DCM2305)

O R D E R

Counsel for Appellant E.L. has moved to withdraw from representing Appellant on 

appeal. The motion is GRANTED.

We further note that although Appellant was entitled to appointed counsel in the trial 

court, Appellant is not entitled to appointed counsel on appeal. 

The Texas Family Code provides for appointed counsel for an indigent parent in child 

protection cases brought by the government “in which termination of the parent-child 

relationship or the appointment of a conservator for a child is requested[.]” TEX.FAM.CODE ANN.

§ 107.013(a)(1). Here, there is no request from the Department for termination or appointment 

of a conservator at issue on appeal, nor is there a judgment terminating Appellant’s parental 

rights or naming the Department as a child’s managing conservator. Instead, the trial court 

issued an order dismissing the Department’s case because Mother had complied with the service 

plan. After ruling on that portion of the case, the trial court then ruled separately on a purported 

counterclaim Appellant brought against Mother for custody of their daughter and dismissed 

Father’s counterclaim. 

Because the dispute is now essentially a private dispute between Appellant and Mother 

over custody of their child following dismissal of the Department’s action, Appellant is not 

entitled to appointed counsel. Cf. In re J.C., 250 S.W.3d 486, 487-88 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 

2008, pet. denied), cert. denied sub nom Rhine v. Deaton, 559 U.S. 903 (2010)(parent not 
2

entitled to statutory appointed counsel when the Department is non-suited and the only 

remaining termination claim is brought by a private party). 

Further, Appellant’s brief is due with this Court on or before April 13, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6

th day of March, 2020.

PER CURIAM

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                       104
<INVENTORY>                                     17,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,781
<PP&E>                                          24,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,293
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,015
<BONDS>                                         20,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,019
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,868
<SALES>                                         24,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,507
<CGS>                                           15,203
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                       450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                649
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification ofChief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofFarmer Bros. Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter endedMarch 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, John E. Simmons, Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: May 11, 2009

 
|   | /s/ John E. Simmons                           |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |                                          |
|   | John E. Simmons                               |
|   | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer         |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting  Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Thierry
Pilenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of the dates and for the periods presented as required by such Report.

March 12, 2004


                                                  /s/ THIERRY PILENKO
                                                -------------------------
                                                      Thierry Pilenko
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Robert Lee ARMSTRONG, Petitioner, Cross-Respondent, v. W. L. COBB CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents, Cross-Petitioners.

No. 38155.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 12, 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 1969.

George H. Brown, III, St. Petersburg, for petitioner, cross-respondent.

Chester L. Skipper of Ramseur, Bradham, Lyle, Skipper & Cramer, St. Petersburg, for respondents, cross-petitioners.

Patrick H. Mears and J, Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 3, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petitions, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petitions are therefore denied.

*730Petitioner’s application for attorney s fees is also denied.

DREW, Acting C. J., and THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 March 29, 2011

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio              43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)



<PAGE>

Item 8.01	Other Events
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. reported corrected tax information on
its 2010 special divdend, as described in Registrant's press release dated
March 29, 2011, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits
---------   ---------------------------------------------

Exhibit No.   Document
-----------   --------

99.1          Press release issued by the Registrant dated March 29, 2011.



                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: March 29, 2011			    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary