alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Home 

### > Natural Gas 

### > Navigator



# Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production (Volumes in Million Cubic Feet) Area: U . S . Period: Annual Show Data By: 

### Data Series Area 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 View History 

### Gross Withdrawals 23,969,678 23,456,822 23,535,018 24,663,656 25,754,348 2 6,176,700 1936 - 2009 

### From Gas Wells 17,885,247 17,471,847 17,995,554 18,845,250 19,909,549 1967 - 2008 

### From Oil Wells 6,084,431 5,984,975 5,539,464 5,818,405 5,844,798 1967 - 2008 

### From Coalbed Wells 1,779,875 1,898,399 2007 - 2008 

### Repressuring 3,701,656 3,699,535 3,264,929 3,662,685 3,638,563 1936 - 2008 

### Vented and Flared 96,408 119,097 129,469 143,457 166,588 1936 - 2008 

### Nonhydrocarbon Gases Removed 654,124 711,095 730,946 661,168 709,681 1973 - 2008 

### Marketed Production 19,517,491 18,927,095 19,409,674 20,196,346 21,239,516 2 1,892,699 1900 - 2009 

### Extraction Loss 926,600 876,497 906,069 930,320 953,451 937,693 1930 - 2009 

### Dry Production 18,590,891 18,050,598 18,503,605 19,266,026 20,286,065 2 0,955,006 1930 - 2009

-= No Data Reported; --= Not Applicable; NA= Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual compa ny data. Notes: Beginning with monthly data for January 2006, "Oth er States" volumes include all of the natural gas p roducing states except: Alaska, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Wyoming, and the Gulf of M exico. "Other States" volumes prior to January 2006 include: Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Pennsyl vania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. Data for 2008 are estimated. Monthly preliminary (from January 2008 to present) state-level data for the production series, except marketedproduction, are not available until after the fina l annual reports for these series are collected and processe d. Final annual data are generally available in thethird quarter of the following year. For years pri or to 2007, coalbed production data are included in Gas Well to tals. See Definitions, Sources, and Notes link above for more information on this table. Release Date: 10/29/2010 Next Release Date: 11/30/2010 

# Page 1 of 1 U.S. Natural Gas Gross Withdrawals and Production

11/11/2010 http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_dcu_NUS_a.htm
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

Date: April 28, 2015

On April 22, 2015, Erika Sasser, Kimber Scavo, and Martha Keating of EPA’ s Health and

Environmental Impacts Division, attended a meeting with representatives of the American

Chemistry Council. The meeting was held at the Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards,

Research Triangle Park, NC. Attendees discussed timing of the final ozone National Ambient

Air Quality Stan dards and the procedure for submitting late comments. The status of the

NAAQS reviews for other pollutants w as also discussed. There were no meeting materials.

The following is a list of attendees from the American Chemistry Council.

Name Company

Bruce Davis DuPont

Jarod Davis Dow

Lorraine Gershman A merican C hemistry C ouncil

Steve Gossett Eastman

Patty Hemmelgarn Ashland

Shari Keller Shell

Scott Munk Bayer CropScience

Derek Reese ExxonMobil

Ro Sharma LyondellBasell

Steve Smith LyondellBasell

Rick Vickery Chemours

Gindi Vincent ExxonMobil

Russell Wozniak Dow

Via phone

Fred Fedri OxyChem

Anu Kunapuli Merck

Carrie Phillips CPChem

Teresa Reksel Evonik
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Pursuant to Section 33105(c) of Title 49, United States Code, and the delegation of the Secretary of Transportation's responsibilities under that Act to the Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration (49 CFR, Section 501.2 (a)(9)), the Secretary of Labor has certified to the Administrator and published this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     that the United States City Average All Items Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (1967=100) increased 136.0 percent from its 1984 annual average of 311.1 to its 2017 annual average of 734.269.                

Signed at Washington, DC, on May 30, 2018.

R. Alexander Acosta,

Secretary of Labor.

[FR Doc. 2018-12485 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

**In connection with the annualreport on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Brian J. Farrell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:**

** **

**(1)**                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

** **

**(2)**                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian J. Farrell    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Brian J. Farrell        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | June 8, 2005       |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7651 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7651

  To require the Transportation Security Administration to conduct a 
 pilot program to screen all passengers for their temperatures before 
   such passengers proceed through security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2020

   Mr. Norman (for himself, Mr. Budd, and Mr. Larson of Connecticut) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Transportation Security Administration to conduct a 
 pilot program to screen all passengers for their temperatures before 
   such passengers proceed through security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Healthy Skies Act''.

SEC. 2. TSA TEMPERATURE SCREENING PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--In order to promote the safety of the traveling 
public during the COVID-19 public health emergency or other pandemic or 
public health emergency, the Administrator of the Transportation 
Security Administration (the ``Administrator'') shall carry out a pilot 
program at a minimum of 10 airports selected by the Administrator to 
establish and test procedures to screen all passengers for their 
temperatures before such passengers proceed through security into the 
sterile area. If the temperature of a passenger exceeds the guidance 
for what constitutes a fever issued by the Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention at the time such temperature screening is carried out, 
the Administrator shall, notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
not permit such passenger to enter the sterile area.
    (b) Consideration.--In carrying out the pilot program under 
subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider a resolution process 
for identifying medical conditions unrelated to COVID-19 that could 
result in a temperature that exceeds CDC guidance.
    (c) Report.--At the conclusion of the pilot program under 
subsection (a), the Administrator shall submit to Congress a report on 
the findings of the program, including lessons learned and how such 
lessons may be applied in a future pandemic or other public health 
emergency.
    (d) Sunset.--This section shall terminate on the date of the 
termination of the COVID-19 public health emergency, as specified by 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services consistent with section 319 
of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7625 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7625

To provide for the release of cosigners on private student loans in the 
               case of the death of the student borrower.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2020

  Ms. Craig introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the release of cosigners on private student loans in the 
               case of the death of the student borrower.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ryan Frascone Memorial Student Loan 
Relief Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE TRUTH IN LENDING 
              ACT.

    Effective on the date of enactment of the Economic Growth, 
Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Public Law 115-174), 
section 601(b) of such Act is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to private education loan agreements entered into before, on, or 
after the date of enactment of this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
10.2 First Amendment






OLD MILL CORPORATE CENTER
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE COLOCATION CENTER AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 6th day of March, 2014 by and between OMTek, LLC (“Lessor”) and Overstock.com, Inc. (“Lessee”).




RECITALS:


		
	A.
	Lessor (formerly known as Old Mill Technology Center, L.L.C.) and Lessee previously entered into a Colocation Center Agreement dated December 1, 2004, for approximately 2,000 square feet in the Old Mill Corporate Center III Building (the “Premises”) located at 6350 South 3000 East, Cottonwood Heights, Salt Lake County, Utah (“the Lease”).  




		
	B.
	Lessor and Lessee desire to extend the Lease as set forth hereinafter:




    
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises and covenants set forth hereinafter, the parties agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Extension of the Lease.  The Lease shall be extended through January 31, 2017.  




		
	2.
	Base Rent.  Rent shall be decreased to $22,173.33 per month commencing on July 1, 2015.      




		
	3.
	Base Rent Escalation.  Rent shall escalate by three percent (3%) on July 1, 2016 to $22,838.53 per month.




		
	4.
	Tenant Improvements.  Lessee accepts the Premises “as-is.”  Lessee acknowledges and agrees that upon execution of the First Amendment Lessor will not provide the maintenance, monitoring, or other services that are required to operate the Premises as a data center.  Old Mill Corporate Center III, LLC will provide the same services to the Premises that it provides the rest of the space in the Old Mill Corporate Center III Building.  Lessee further acknowledges that in exchange for this Amendment and decrease in Base Rent, Lessee will be responsible for its share of the building operating expenses and all electrical charges incurred in its use of the Premises beginning on July 1, 2015.




		
	5.
	Real Estate Commission.  Lessor and Lessee warrant that neither party is represented by an outside real estate broker or agent in connection with this First Amendment to the Lease.  Lessor represents and warrants that it hasn’t paid any commissions associated with Lessee’s Lease or amendments thereto.




		
	6.
	Provisions of Lease.  Except as specifically modified by this First Amendment, all of the provisions of the Lease, as previously amended, shall remain in full force effect.  




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to the Colocation Center Agreement as of the day and year first above written.


	
					
	LESSOR:
	 
	LESSEE:

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	OMTek, LLC    
	 
	Overstock.com, Inc.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By
	  /s/ Richard M. Beckstrand     
	 
	By
	  /s/ Jonathan E. Johnson III                 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Its:
	   Manager                   
	 
	Its:
	   Executive Vice Chairman
#### ECONOMY CARPETS MFG. & DIST., INC. v. BETTER BUSINESS BUREAU OF BATON ROUGE AREA, INC., et al.

No. 61019.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Better Business Bureau of Baton Rouge Area, Inc. et al applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit (Parish of E. Baton Rouge), 351 So.2d 1246.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS and DIXON, JJ„ would grant the writ.
#### Jesse BELLAMY v. STATE of Alabama.

6 Div. 365.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 20, 1978.

Rehearing Denied July 25, 1978.

Robert Bryan, Birmingham, for appellant.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Larry R. Newman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, appellee.

Conviction for murder in the second degree AFFIRMED without opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7677 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7677

 To require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on 
use of domestic nonavailability determinations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2020

 Mr. Brindisi (for himself and Mr. McKinley) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on 
use of domestic nonavailability determinations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening American Manufacturing 
Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON USE OF DOMESTIC NONAVAILABILITY DETERMINATIONS.

    Not later than September 30, 2021, and annually thereafter, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit a report to congressional defense 
committees--
            (1) describing in detail the use of any waiver or exception 
        by the Department of Defense to the requirements of chapter 83 
        of title 41, United States Code, or section 2533a of title 10, 
        United States Code, relating to domestic nonavailability 
        determinations;
            (2) specifying the type of waiver or exception used; and
            (3) providing an assessment of the impact on the use of 
        such waivers or exceptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic and 
        associated challenges with investments in domestic sources.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7584 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are 

pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws 

administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study 

allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional 

offices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2020 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. WALDEN, Mr. ALLRED, and Mrs. 

RADEWAGEN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional offices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7584 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE TO 

2 INCLUDE CERTAIN OUTREACH SERVICES 

3 CONDUCTED THROUGH CONGRESSIONAL OF4 FICES. 

5 Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(K) The following activities carried out at the 

9 offices of Members of Congress for such Members: 

10 ‘‘(i) The distribution of information to 

11 members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and 

12 their dependents about the benefits and services 

13 under laws administered by the Secretary and 

14 other appropriate governmental and non-gov15 ernmental programs. 

16 ‘‘(ii) The preparation and processing of pa17 pers and other documents, including documents 

18 to assist in the preparation and presentation of 

19 claims for benefits under laws administered by 

20 the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     Enzo J. Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
     to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.












     /S/ ENZO J. VIALARDI
     --------------------
     Enzo J. Vialardi
     Chief Financial Officer
     August 4, 2004



<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2.
     Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancWest Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas C.
Grigsby, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|     |  |                 |  |    |  |                                                                                                   
|---- |  | --------------- |  | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date |  | August 14, 2002 |  | By |  | /s/  Douglas C. Grigsby
Douglas C. Grigsby
   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LIMITED, Petitioner, v. Ruth WINTER, as Assignee, Respondent.

No. 43276.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 26, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 781.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
#### Douglas D. Davison et al., Appellants, v Order Ecumenical et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[721 NYS2d 282]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lebowitz, J.), dated May 9, 2000, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action based on General Municipal Law § 205-a.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the cause of action based on General Municipal Law § 205-a since there is no reasonable or practical connection between the violations alleged and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff firefighter *(see, Kenavan v City of New York,*267 AD2d 353; *Dillon v City of New York,*238 AD2d 302; *Patsos v Suffolk Charles Assocs.,*226 AD2d 608).

The Supreme Court properly considered the arguments raised in the defendants’ reply affirmation, since they were made in direct response to the plaintiffs’ opposition papers *(cf., Held v Kaufman,*238 AD2d 546, *affd*91 NY2d 425; *Murphy v Hanover Ins. Co.,*239 AD2d 323). Friedmann, J. P., Florio, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.