alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Luis Santiago, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 832]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered February 26, 1999, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, assault in the second degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to concurrent indeterminate terms of 5 to 10 years imprisonment on the conviction of attempted murder in the second degree, with a consecutive determinate term of 5 years added to the minimum indeterminate term pursuant to Penal Law § 265.09 (2), 10 to 20 years imprisonment on each conviction of criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, 5 to 15 years imprisonment on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and 2/s to 7 years imprisonment on the conviction of reckless endangerment in the first degree, and a determinate term of 7 years imprisonment on the conviction of assault in the second degree.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the sentence imposed on the conviction of assault in the second degree from a determinate term of 7 years imprisonment to an indeterminate term of 3 V2 to 7 years imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the court failed to properly charge the jury with regard to the subjective and objective elements of his justification defense *(see, People v Wesley,*76 NY2d 555).

The sentence imposed on the conviction of assault in the *567second degree was illegal (see, Penal Law § 70.00 [3] [b]; [2]). “It is clear however, that the Supreme Court intended to impose upon the defendant the maximum sentence for [this] offense, and we find that it would be appropriate to do so” *(People v Utenyshev,*264 AD2d 402, 403). The judgment is therefore modified to reflect the Supreme Court’s intention.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.
James Adair

Above Ground Aero, LLC

120 Teachers Row

Richmond Hill, GA 31324

abovegroundaero@gmail.com

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

October 28, 2015

Please use this letter as a request to amend Above Ground Aero, LLC’s Section 333 request to 

add 3DR Aero-M fixed wing UAS for approval. The Aero-M weighs 6.8 lbs with camera 

payload and maximum speed is 44 mph. It has some of the same fail safe features that are found 

on popular quad-copters. Please see the attached operations manual for more information.

Regards,

James Adair

Above Ground Aero, LLC
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 7, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 4, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 438 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-161, CP2018-231.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-12255 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>   1
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                  FORM 10-Q/A
 
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934
 
    For The Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 1998
 
                                       OR
 
( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934
 
                         Commission File Number 1-8552
 
                              BANC ONE CORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                         <C>
                        Ohio                                                     31-0738296
     ------------------------------------------                  ------------------------------------------
  (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR                       (IRS EMPLOYER I.D. NUMBER)
                    ORGANIZATION)
</TABLE>
 
                  100 East Broad Street, Columbus, Ohio 43271
                ------------------------------------------------
            (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)     (ZIP CODE)
 
                                 (614) 248-5944
                                ----------------
              (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)
 
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  X          No  __
 
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's common stock, no par value,
$5 stated value, was 704,860,781 at July 31, 1998.
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   2
 
                                   SIGNATURES
 
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       BANC ONE CORPORATION
<S>                                    <C>
           August 13, 1998                             /s/ William C. Leiter
------------------------------------   -----------------------------------------------------
 
                Date                                     William C. Leiter
                                                     Chief Accounting Officer
</TABLE>
 
                                       33
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                            Certification Pursuant to
                               Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Escalon Medical Corp. (the "Company"), that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 3, 2003                                 /s/  Richard J. DePiano
     --------------------                           -----------------------
                                                    Richard J. DePiano
                                                    Chairman and Chief Executive
                                                    Officer (Principal Executive
                                                    Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 27, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000034408
<NAME> FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-26-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-27-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      81,524,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                574,338,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           716,700,709
<PP&E>                                     680,241,374
<DEPRECIATION>                             229,533,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,174,650,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      367,434,828
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    18,361,548
<OTHER-SE>                                 759,374,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,174,650,638
<SALES>                                  2,342,796,717
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,342,796,717
<CGS>                                    1,538,887,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,119,636,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            223,160,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                81,465,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        141,695,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               141,695,055
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7358 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7358

   To provide that no Federal funds shall be used to alter, change, 
   destroy, or remove, in whole or in part, any name, face, or other 
            feature on the Mount Rushmore National Memorial.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2020

 Mr. Johnson of South Dakota (for himself, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Fulcher, 
  Mr. Conaway, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Hagedorn, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Rouzer, Mr. 
 Bergman, Mr. Keller, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. 
   Smucker, Mr. Davidson of Ohio, Mr. Johnson of Louisiana, and Mr. 
   Meuser) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that no Federal funds shall be used to alter, change, 
   destroy, or remove, in whole or in part, any name, face, or other 
            feature on the Mount Rushmore National Memorial.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mount Rushmore Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) Mount Rushmore National Memorial is America's Shrine of 
        Democracy.
            (2) The Mount Rushmore National Memorial depicts the faces 
        of Presidents George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore 
        Roosevelt, and Abraham Lincoln, with the beauty of the Black 
        Hills of South Dakota.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS.

    No Federal funds shall be used to alter, change, destroy, or 
remove, in whole or in part, any name, face, or other feature on the 
Mount Rushmore National Memorial.
                                 <all>
```
From: "Lengerich, Steve" <SLENGERI@idem.IN.gov>

To: "Raymond, Sarah" <SRAYMOND@idem.IN.gov>, "Zeiler, Dick" <DZEILER@idem.IN.gov>,

Andy Chang/R5/USEPA/US@EPA

Wedid put the sampler in at the Muncie East location. The first sample was sche duled for Jan. 8. Exide is operating one sampler along side of ours. they discontinued the W est location. 

# Steve

From: Raymond, Sarah Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:57 AM To: Zeiler, Dick; Lengerich, Steve Subject: FW: Quick Question about Muncie East Monitor (Pb) Hi Dick and Steve, Below is a question from Andy Chang at U.S. EPA. Figured you could give him a better explanation that what I could regarding the Exide monitors. From: Chang.Andy@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Chang.Andy@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 10:36 AM To: Raymond, Sarah Subject: Quick Question about Muncie East Monitor (Pb) Hi Sarah, Did the plan to put an IDEM monitor at the Muncie East site come to fruition in January 2010? I know it was part of the designa tions submittal and monitoring network plan, but wasn't sure if you all had to find a different location for the IDEM monitor. Also, is Exide going to continue operating the two sites, or will they try to phase that out? Thanks again for all your hel p.

************************************************************* We ian 'Andy' Chang Environmental Engineer US EPA Region 5 Air and Radiation Division 77 W . Jackson Blvd AR
- 18J Chicago, IL 60604312.886.0258 (direct)

312.697.2639 (fax)
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7266 

To prohibit COVID-19 liability waiver enforceability for large indoor 

gatherings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. POCAN (for himself and Mr. TAKANO) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit COVID-19 liability waiver enforceability for large 

indoor gatherings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Refusal to Accept 

5 Losses or Liability In Every Situation Act’’ or ‘‘RALLIES 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. COVID-19 LIABILITY WAIVERS UNENFORCEABLE 

8 FOR LARGE INDOOR GATHERINGS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title 9 of the United States Code 

10 is amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7266 IH

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 4—WAIVER OF LIABILITY 

2 DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC 

‘‘Sec. 

‘‘401. COVID-19 liability waiver unenforceable for large indoor gatherings. 

3 ‘‘§ 401. COVID-19 liability waiver unenforceable for 

4 large indoor gatherings 

5 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no 

6 agreement entered into waiving liability pertaining to con7 tracting COVID-19 at an indoor gathering of more than 

8 1,000 persons shall be valid or enforceable for an event 

9 occurring in a locality experiencing a 14-day increase in 

10 the number of COVID-19 cases.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
DENY; and Opinion Filed June 30, 2015.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00771-CV

IN RE ROBERT C. LOWRY, M.D., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-01187

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Whitehill

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting the Court order the trial court 

to set aside its orders finding relator in contempt of court and ordering him to pay attorney’s fees. 

Contempt orders that do not involve confinement may be reviewed by a petition for writ of 

mandamus. In re Long, 984 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. 1999) (orig. proceeding). In an original 

proceeding challenging a contempt order, the relator has the burden to show that the order is 

void. See In re Aslam, 348 S.W.3d 299, 302 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, orig. proceeding) 

(citing In re Coppock, 277 S.W.3d 417, 418 (Tex. 2009) (orig. proceeding)). We conclude 

relator has failed to establish a right to mandamus relief. We deny the petition.

150771F.P05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
No. 10661.

#### The Mt. Vernon Electric Light Co. *v.*The Knox County Oil & Gas Co.

Decided June 26, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Knox county.

*Mr. F. V. Owen*and *Mr. L. B.*Houck, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. F. O. Levering; Mr. FI. C. Devin-; Mr. R. M. Greer*and *Messrs. W(light &*Moore, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Maurice J. DELANCY, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, Unemployment Compensation Division, Respondent.

No. 70-225.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 26, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23.2


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-____________) pertaining to the 1999
Long-Term Incentive Plan/Stock Option Agreement For Paul M.
Jennings of our report dated August 5, 1999 (except for Note 11,
as to which the date is August 23, 1999) with respect to the
financial statements of ASD Systems, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1998, the financial statements of ASD Partners, Ltd.
for the period October 14, 1997 to December 31, 1997, and to the
use of our reports dated August 5, 1999 with respect to the
financial statements of the Fulfillment Division of Athletic
Supply of Dallas, LLC for the period December 21, 1996 to
October 13, 1997 and the financial statements of the Fulfillment
Division of Athletic Supply of Dallas, Inc. for the period
January 1, 1996 to December 20, 1996, appearing in the
Registration Statement (Form S-1 No. 333-85983) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act
of 1933.



/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
December 21, 1999
#### Andrew JOSEPH, Sr., a/k/a Papa Drew, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-292.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 6, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                   FORM 8-K/A

                                 CURRENT REPORT

                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


       DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED) SEPTEMBER 17, 1997

                          PACKAGING PLUS SERVICES, INC.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)


    NEVADA                         0-18094                       11-2781803
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(STATE OR OTHER                 (COMMISSION                    (IRS EMPLOYER
JURISDICTION OF                 FILE NUMBER)                 IDENTIFICATION NO.)
  FORMATION)



               20 SOUTH TERMINAL DRIVE, PLAINVIEW, NEW YORK 11803
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (ZIP CODE)



        REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE (516) 349-1300


 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (FORMER NAME OR FORMER ADDRESS, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT)


 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



<PAGE>


FORM 8K-A

TO PACKAGING PLUS SERVICES, INC.

ITEM 2


On October 2, 1997, the Company filed a Form 8-K with respect to its September
17, 1997 acquisition of Leone, Inc. (Office Quick) and ETC. ETC. The Company
stated that it would file financials on the acquisitions within 60 days. Upon
further review and pursuant to SEC Regulations, the Form 8-K, the referenced
financial statements and the pro forma financial statements for these
acquisitions, were not technically required. This was due in part to the
relative size of the acquisitions. Accordingly, the Form 8-K should not have
been filed.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES
                                   ----------

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                   PACKAGING PLUS SERVICES, INC.





                                                 /S/ RICHARD A. ALTOMARE
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Richard A. Altomare, President
                                                 as Registrant's duly authorized
                                                 Chairman of the Board.


Dated: July 23, 1998