8424 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Notices

purposes, our written description of the

scope of the order is dispositive.

Amended Final Results of Review

Upon correction of the ministerial

error, we have determined that the

margin remains unchanged from the

amended final results published on

January 15, 1997. However, as discussed

above, importer specific assessment

rates will change and we will instruct

Customs accordingly.

Manufacturer/exporter

Time period Margin

(percent)

Saha Thai/

SAF ........ 3/1/94–2/28/95 7.27

The Customs Service shall assess

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. Individual differences between

United States price and normal value

may vary from the percentages stated

above. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

the Customs Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of certain circular welded

carbon steel pipes and tubes from

Thailand entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse, for consumption on or after

the publication date of these final

results, as provided for by section

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash

deposit rates for the reviewed

companies will be the rates for those

firms as stated above; (2) for previously

investigated companies not listed above,

the cash deposit rate will continue to be

the company-specific rate published for

the most recent period; (3) if the

exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, or the original investigation, but

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit

rate will be the rate established for the

most recent period for the manufacturer

of the merchandise; and (4) the cash

deposit rate for all other manufacturers

or exporters will continue to be 15.67

percent for circular welded carbon steel

pipes and tubes, the all others rate

established in the LTFV investigations.

See Final Determination and

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain

Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes

from Thailand, (51 FR 8341, March 11,

1986).

These deposit requirements, when

imposed, shall remain in effect until

publication of the final results of the

next administrative review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (APO) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with section 353.34(d) of the

Department’s regulations. Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and the terms of an

APO is a sanctionable violation. This

administrative review and notice are in

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR

353.28(c).

Dated: February 13, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–4632 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–580–815 & A–580–816]

Certain Cold-Rolled and CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products

From Korea; Extension of Time Limits

for Antidumping Duty Administrative

Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of time limits for

antidumping duty administrative

reviews of certain cold-rolled and

corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat

products from Korea.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(‘‘the Department’’) is extending the

time limits for the preliminary results of

the third antidumping duty

administrative reviews of the

antidumping orders on certain coldrolled and corrosion-resistant carbon

steel flat products from Korea. These

reviews cover three manufacturers and

exporters of the subject merchandise:

Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., Union Steel

Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Pohang

Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. The period of

review is August 1, 1995 through July

31, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alain Letort or John R. Kugelman, AD/

CVD Enforcement Group III—Office 8,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington

D.C. 20230, telephone (202) 482–4243 or

482–0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Department initiated these

administrative reviews on September

16, 1996 (61 FR 48882). Because it is not

practicable to complete these reviews

within the time limits mandated by

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of

1930 (‘‘the Act’), as amended by the

Uruguay Round Agreements Act of

1994, the Department is extending the

time limits for the preliminary results of

the aforementioned reviews to August 1,

1997. See memorandum from Joseph A.

Spetrini to Robert S. LaRussa, which is

on file in Room B–099 at the

Department’s headquarters.

This extension of time limits is in

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of

the Act.

Dated: February 18, 1997.

Joseph A. Spetrini

Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD

Enforcement Group III.

[FR Doc. 97–4508 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–570–830]

Coumarin From the People’s Republic

of China: Amended Order and Final

Determination of Antidumping Duty

Investigation in Accordance With

Decision Upon Remand

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Amendment to final

determination of antidumping duty

investigation in accordance with

decision upon remand.

SUMMARY: On May 9, 1996, the Court of

International Trade (CIT) remanded to

the Department of Commerce,

International Trade Administration (the

Department), one issue arising from the

antidumping determination titled Final

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair

Value: Coumarin From the People’s

Republic of China (59 FR 66895,

December 28, 1994).

Pursuant to the remand order, the

Departmental filed its Remand

Determination: Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v.

United States, Court No. 95–03–00275,

on September 23, 1996. Upon finding

errors in the Remand Determination, the

Department filed its Amended Remand

Determination: Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v.

United States on October 3, 1996 (the

‘‘Amended Remand Results’’). In