alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                             BANKBOSTON CORPORATION

                    Computation of Earnings Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                                                    Quarters Ended         Six Months Ended
                                                                       June 30                 June 30
 
      EARNINGS (in millions)                                       1997        1996        1997        1996
      --------                                                     ----        ----        ----        ----
 
<S>                                                          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>  
1.    Net income                                                $   212     $   214     $   419     $   369
 
2.    Less: preferred dividends                                       9           9          19          19
                                                                -------     -------     -------     -------
 
3.    Net income applicable to primary and fully diluted
        earnings per common share                               $   203     $   205     $   400     $   350
                                                                =======     =======     =======     =======
 
 
      SHARES (in thousands)
      ------
 
4.    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      147,910     153,650     150,650     154,318
 
5.    Incremental shares from assumed exercise
        of dilutive stock options as of the beginning
        of the period using the treasury stock method             1,877       1,533       2,041       1,700
                                                                -------     -------     -------     -------
 
7.    Adjusted number of common shares                          149,787     155,183     152,691     156,018
                                                                =======     =======     =======     =======
 
      PER SHARE CALCULATION
      ---------------------
 
8.    Primary net income per common share                     $    1.37   $    1.33   $    2.66   $    2.27
      (Item 3 divided by Item 4)
 
9.    Fully diluted net income per common share               $    1.35   $    1.32   $    2.62   $    2.24
      (Item 3 divided by Item 7)
 
</TABLE>
#### Henry L. PAYNE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 78-1230.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 8, 1978.

As Modified Sept. 20, 1978.

RYDER, Judge.

Appellant moved to vacate the sentence given him after a plea of guilty, alleging that his appointed counsel was ineffective and that his plea was involuntary. The trial judge denied the motion without attaching any portion of the record or file and without holding an evidentiary hearing to determine the veracity of appellant’s allegations.

If, as is the case here, a motion to vacate sentence addresses matters which can be raised in a collateral attack, and alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a prisoner to relief, then the judge reviewing the motion must attach that portion of the case file or record which conclusively shows that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or grant an evidentiary hearing. *See*Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. Neither action was taken by the court below. The cause is, therefore, REMANDED to the trial court under a temporary relinquishment of jurisdiction with instructions (a) to attach that portion of the case file and record which refutes appellant’s allegations; or (b) to conduct an evidentiary hearing and, then, either grant or deny the relief sought by appellant.

GRIMES, C. J., and SCHEB, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32(a)

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Oxford Health Plans, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: February 4, 2004 |  | /s/ CHARLES G. BERG    
|                        |  |                        
|                        |  | Charles G. Berg.       
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
copies of state Forms

Ecology has not developed any new state forms pursuant to the

proposed state corrective action program.

RCRIS information will be submitted using existing RCRIS forms

provided by U.s. EPA.
#### Floyd CLEVELAND, Petitioner, v. Honorable Roy H. AMIDON, Judge, Criminal Court of Record, in and for Polk County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-845.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 10, 1970.

Prohibition denied.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Joseph J. Simons, Chairman 

Noah Joshua Phillips 

Rohit Chopra

Rebecca Kelly Slaughter

Christine S. Wilson

In the Matter of

Peabody Energy Corporation, 

a public company; 

Docket No. 9391 

and 

Arch Coal, Inc., 

a public company.

THIRD ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

IN LIGHT OF PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY

By orders dated March 19, 2020, and April 13, 2020, the Commission has already stayed 

this proceeding and deferred the commencement of the evidentiary hearing by 75 days. Because 

of the declared public health emergency1 associated with the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 

2019 (“COVID-19”), also known as SARS-CoV-2, and because it has been advised that 

gatherings of people in close proximity may facilitate the spread of the disease, the Commission 

has determined that it is in the public interest to mitigate the transmission and impact of COVID19, and that good cause exists to stay this proceeding for an additional period of approximately 

30 days and to again reschedule the evidentiary hearing. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this proceeding be fully stayed, except for matters of 

settlement, through July 6, 2020; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the evidentiary hearing be rescheduled to commence 

on December 1, 2020, and all pre-hearing deadlines in this proceeding be further extended by 32 

calendar days. The Administrative Law Judge retains discretion to adjust any such pre-hearing 

deadlines to the extent compatible with the hearing date as set by this Order or to make a 

recommendation to the Commission regarding an alternative hearing date.

1 Pursuant to the Public Health Services Act, 42 U.S.C. § 247d, on January 31, 2020, the Secretary of the Department 

of Health and Human Services issued a declaration that a health emergency exists because of COVID-19; and on 

March 13, 2020, the President of the United States issued a proclamation that a national emergency exists concerning 

COVID-19. Remarks by President Trump, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarkspresident-trump-vice-president-pence-members-coronavirus-task-force-press-conference-3/ (Mar. 13, 2020).
By the Commission, Commissioner Slaughter not participating. 

April J. Tabor 

Acting Secretary

SEAL:

ISSUED: June 3, 2020
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAZEN ARAKJI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-16587 

D.C. No. 3:18-cv-03192-VC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19, 2021**

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Mazen Arakji appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his action alleging federal and state law employment claims. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal of an 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 27 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 18-16587 

action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i). Denton v. Hernandez, 504 

U.S. 25, 33 (1992). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Arakji’s action as 

frivolous because his damages request of $155 billion was unsupported by Arakji’s 

claims. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7715 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7715

   To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces who are 
    outside of the State under orders to renew a permit to carry a 
      concealed firearm through the mail, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2020

Mr. Smith of Missouri (for himself, Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. 
Gaetz, Mr. Rouzer, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Van Drew, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Weber of 
Texas, Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Marshall, Mr. 
 Gosar, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Budd, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Steube, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Keller, Mr. Kelly 
of Pennsylvania, Mr. Bergman, Mr. Mullin, and Mr. Spano) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To encourage States to permit members of the Armed Forces who are 
    outside of the State under orders to renew a permit to carry a 
      concealed firearm through the mail, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``U.S. Military Right to Carry Act''.

SEC. 2. CONCEALED CARRY RENEWALS BY MAIL FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES.

    (a) In General.--A State that receives funds under subpart 1 of 
part E of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 (34 U.S.C. 10151 et seq.) shall have in place--
            (1) a law or policy that permits a member of the Armed 
        Forces who is a resident of the State and who is outside of the 
        State under orders to renew a permit to carry a concealed 
        firearm through the mail; and
            (2) a law or policy that treats a member of the Armed 
        Forces on active duty in the State as a resident of the State 
        for purposes of issuing a permit to carry a concealed firearm 
        in the State.
    (b) Reduction in Funds.--Beginning in the first fiscal year that 
begins after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General 
shall, with respect to the amount that a State would otherwise receive 
under the grant program described in subsection (a)--
            (1) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the case of a State 
        that fails to comply with the requirement under subsection 
        (a)(1); and
            (2) reduce such amount by 5 percent in the case of a State 
        that fails to comply with the requirement under subsection 
        (a)(2).
    (c) Reallocation.--The Attorney General shall reallocate amounts 
not awarded to a State pursuant to subsection (b) to States that comply 
with the requirement under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. La HAYE BROTHERS, INC., Defendant and Appellee.

No. 4130.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1973.

Alva Jones, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant.

Devillier & Ardoin, by Michael Morrow, Eunice, for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, HOOD, and DOMEN-GEAUX, JJ.

DOMENGEAUX, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case of State of Louisiana, Department of Highways v. La Haye Brothers, Inc., 277 So.2d 198, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

HOOD, J.,

dissents for the reasons assigned in the companion case, State, Department of Highways v. LaHaye Brothers, Inc., 277 So.2d 198.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 772 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 772

To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant religious 
workers to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the 
                             United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 24, 2019

 Mr. King of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the country of origin of certain special immigrant religious 
workers to extend reciprocal immigration treatment to nationals of the 
                             United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Worker Visa Reciprocity 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRING RECIPROCAL IMMIGRATION TREATMENT.

    Section 204(a)(1)(G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(G)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(iii) Beginning on October 1, 2017, no petition may be approved 
for classification of an alien as a special immigrant under section 
101(a)(27)(C) if the Secretary of Homeland Security has determined that 
the country of the alien's nationality--
            ``(I) is identified as a `Country of Particular Concern' or 
        a country where religious freedom is of significant interest in 
        the 2018 International Religious Freedom Report; or
            ``(II) does not extend reciprocal immigration treatment to 
        nationals of the United States who are seeking resident status 
        in order to work in a religious vocation or occupation.''.
                                 <all>
```
E-1 

Appendix E 

The nine graphs contained in this appendix depict nine years of emissions versus load data for 

the AEP/PSO Southwestern Unit 3. Please see section III.F.2.6 for a discussion of how this 

information was incorporated into our proposed BART determination for this unit. 

 
E-2 
E-3 
E-4 
E-5 
E-6 

 
E-7 
E-8 

 
E-9 
E-10
Exhibit 99.2

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Ocean Express Lines, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Edward F. Cowle, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/   EDWARD F. COWLE

Edward F. Cowle
Principal Accounting Officer
April 8, 2003
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 17, 2016

t1110

Order 

Clerk

November 17, 2016

153472

CURTIS JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153472

COA: 324600 

Ct of Claims: 14-000097-MP

MADISON SUTHERLAND,

Defendant, 

and

ERICA HUSS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4980]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities: Meeting 
XXXVII and Press Conference With Honorary Chair, Hillary Rodham Clinton

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities will be held 
on February 25, 1997 from 1:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. This meeting will 
convene in conjunction with a press conference at which the Honorary 
Chair of the President's Committee, Hillary Rodham Clinton, will 
release Creative America, the report to the President on the state of 
support for arts and culture in the United States. The press conference 
will take place before the meeting. Both will be held at the Library of 
Congress, at the Northwest Curtain and Pavilion in the Jefferson 
Building, 10 First Street, SE, Washington, DC. The President's 
Committee Meeting will be open to the public and begin at 1:30 with a 
statement by the Chairman regarding the Committee's objectives for 
1997.
    The President's Committee on the Arts and the Humanities was 
created by Executive Order in 1982 to advise the President, the two 
Endowments, and the IMS on measures to encourage private sector support 
for the nation's cultural institutions and to promote public 
understanding of the arts and the humanities.
    If, in the course of discussion, it becomes necessary for the 
Committee to discuss non-public commercial or financial information of 
intrinsic value, the Committee will go into closed session pursuant to 
subsection (c)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.
    Any interested persons may attend as observers, on a space 
available basis, but seating is limited in meeting rooms and staff of 
the Library of Congress will need to know who will be attending.
    Therefore, for this meeting, individuals wishing to attend are 
required to notify the staff of the President's Committee in advance at 
(202) 682-5409 or write to the Committee at 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW, Suite 526, Washington, DC 20506.

    Dated: February 24, 1997.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 97-4980 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1  Certification of Interim President,Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 307 of Regulation S-K  I, Richard Banakus, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2009;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  /s/: Richard Banakus Richard Banakus
 Interim President, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  August 14, 2009
#### Danny Lee WRIGHT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43184.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 60.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.