alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jimmy DEATON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 46144.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 21, 1970.

*453James L. Mounce, Tupelo, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Timmie Hancock, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

ETHRIDGE, Chief Justice:

Jimmy Deaton, appellant, was convicted of grand larceny in the Circuit Court of Lee County, for the theft of 200 quail of the value of $1.00 each. The evidence supports the jury’s verdict, including its finding that the stolen quail were worth more than the necessary $100 to constitute grand larceny. Miss. Code 1942 Ann. § 2240 (Supp.1968). The owner of the quail and an accomplice of defendant both testified sufficiently as to their value.

The indictment charged that the crime was committed on November 14, 1968, while the evidence showed that it was actually committed on August 16, 1968. Under Code section 2451, an indictment is not insufficient for omitting to state the time at which the offense was committed in a case where time is not of the essence, or for stating the time imperfectly. Miss. Code 1942 Ann. § 2451 (1956). Time may or may not be of the essence of an offense when an alibi defense is presented, depending upon the circumstances of the particular case. Snow-den v. State, 62 Miss. 100 (1884). In the instant proceedings the record reflects that appellant was not surprised or prejudiced by testimony that the offense occurred on August 16, rather than the date charged in the indictment. Appellant offered testimony of an alibi for both dates. Moreover, the opening statement of the district attorney contended that the crime was committed on the proper date, and, when the owner of the quail was testifying concerning the date of the offense, the court overruled defendant’s objection to testimony about the August 16 date.

The State obtained four instructions, and originally the court approved sixteen instructions for defendant, including one which told the jury that if the state failed to prove that Deaton stole the birds in question on November 14, 1968, then it should find for defendant. On closing arguments, defendant’s attorney referred to that instruction and argued that, if the jury believed the testimony, it could not find that the quail were stolen on November 14. The jury retired to consider its verdict, after having been handed the instructions with the one in question removed and marked “refused” by the trial judge. We find no reversible error in the withdrawal of that instruction from the jury. The possibility of prejudice is remote at best.

A trial judge may withdraw a previously granted instruction during closing arguments. The court, either on its own motion or on motion of counsel, may correct errors in its instructions by withdrawing one, and it will be presumed on appeal that the jury accepted the instructions as granted. McLaurin v. State, 205 Miss. 554, 37 So.2d 8 (1948). The able judge who presided over the trial again considered defendant’s contention that this action was error on the motion for a new trial, and necessarily found no prejudice. He did not abuse his discretion in so doing.

Affirmed.

RODGERS, JONES, BRADY and SMITH, JJ., concur.
No. 10413.

#### Hickle *v.*Gunther.

Decided May 5, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Wyandot county.

*Mr. A. G. Fuller,*for plaintiff in error.

*420
      *Mr. D. C. Parker*and *Mr. M. B. Smith,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 125 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 759 

[Report No. 116–165] 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 

are equal and fair, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. BABIN (for himself, Mr. HURD of Texas, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. WEBER of 

Texas, Mr. GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. VELA, Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. GIBBS, 

Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. AUSTIN

SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. CUELLAR, and Mr. PETERSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 

Resources 

JULY 22, 2019 

Additional sponsors: Mr. GOODEN, Mr. CLAY, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Ms. 

ESCOBAR, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mrs. 

RADEWAGEN, Mr. GOSAR, Ms. HAALAND, Mr. ALLRED, and Mr. VEASEY

JULY 22, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 759 RH

A BILL 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development 

on terms that are equal and fair, and for other purposes. 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 759 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 

5 and Alabama-Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair 

6 Opportunity Settlement Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

8 The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta 

9 Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (Public Law 100– 

10 89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended by adding at the end the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

13 ‘‘Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude 

14 or limit the applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory 

15 Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).’’. 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 125 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 759 

[Report No. 116–165] 

A BILL 

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic develother purposes. opment on terms that are equal and fair, and for 

JULY 22, 2019 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 11

DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
THREE MONTHS ENDED October 30, 1999




                                                                 Per Share
                                         Net Income     Shares     Amount
                                         ----------     ------     ------


         Basic Earnings Per Share:

         Income available to common
             shareholders                $1,525,978    7,786,004    $.20
                                         ----------    ---------    ====


         Effect of Dilutive Securities:

         Warrants                                         11,408

         Options                                         374,365
                                        -----------    ---------
         Diluted Earnings Per Share     $ 1,525,978    8,171,777    $.19
                                        ===========    =========    ====
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Doris LEE.

No. 54427.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 11, 1974.

In re: Doris Lee applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and Stay Order.

Denied. Applicant has an adequate remedy by appeal after sentence.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ORlG1NAL FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRA TIVE LAW JUDGES 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

ECM BioFilms, Inc., 

a corporation, also d/b/a 

Enviroplastics International, 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NO. 9358 

) 

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.21 
 (b), which requires a scheduling conference within ten days after the Answer is filed, the initial scheduling conference wil be held on 

November 21,2013, at 2:00 p.m. in Room 532, Federal Trade Commission Building, 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC. 

The paries are directed to meet before the scheduling conference and to comply 

with Commission Rule 3.21 
 (a) and (b). The expected scheduling order wil be provided to the parties in advance of the scheduling conference. 

ORDERED: :DM~
 

D. Michael Ch¡lp~
 

Chief Administrative Law Judge
 

Date: November 15,2013
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 11


                                       FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC.
                             STATEMENT RE COMPUTATIONS OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                                                             QUARTER ENDED                   QUARTER ENDED
AS PRESENTED                                               NOVEMBER 27, 1999               NOVEMBER 28, 1998
                                                         BASIC         DILUTED           BASIC        DILUTED
<S>                                                <C>             <C>               <C>            <C>

AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING                          172,804,326     172,804,326       172,231,640    172,231,640

NET INCOME                                         $ 36,583,521    $ 36,583,521      $ 29,608,931   $ 29,608,931

NET INCOME PER SHARE                                      $ .21           $ .21             $ .17          $ .17

PRO FORMA DILUTION IMPACT OF COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS

ADDITIONAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES FROM
   ASSUMED EXERCISE AT THE BEGINNING
   OF THE YEAR OF DILUTIVE STOCK OPTIONS                              4,488,446                        4,206,758

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES ASSUMED REPURCHASED FROM
  ASSUMED PROCEEDS OF EXERCISES USING TREASURY STOCK
  METHOD (AVERAGE MARKET PRICE)                                      (3,298,103)                      (2,969,182)

NET PRO FORMA COMMON STOCK
  EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES                                       1,190,343                        1,237,576

PERCENTAGE DILUTION FROM PRO FORMA COMMON
  STOCK EQUIVALENT INCREMENTAL SHARES                                     0.69%                            0.72%

TOTAL COMMON STOCK AND COMMON
  STOCK EQUIVALENTS                                                 173,994,669                      173,469,216

NET INCOME                                                         $ 36,583,521                     $ 29,608,931

PRO FORMA NET INCOME PER SHARE (INCLUDING DILUTIVE
   COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS)                                              $ .21                            $ .17


</TABLE>
No. 10975.

#### Pugh, Treasurer, *v.*Van Behren.

Decided May 26, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. George S. Marshall,*city solicitor, and *Mr. John L. Davies,*
      *436for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Kinkead, Sheets &*West, for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed at the cost of the defendant in error.

' And thereupon, this court proceeding to render judgment which the circuit court of said Franklin county should have rendered, it is ordered and adjudged that there is due plaintiff in error on said assessment, as in the petition set forth,, and interest thereon, duly levied and assessed on Lot No. 16 in Samuel Parson's Addition, as the same is more particularly described in the petition herein, the sum of Eight Hundred and Eighty-Three and 52-100 Dollars ($883.52), with interest from May 26, 1908.

It is, therefore, considered, adjudged and decreed by the court, that unless the said defendant in error pay or cause to be paid to said plaintiff in error the said sum aforesaid, within three days from the entry of this decree, that said real estate be sold for the payment of said assessment and interest thereon, as provided by law.

It is further considered and ordered that the plaintiff in error recover of the defendant in error his costs in this court, in the circuit court and in the court of common pleas expended, to be taxed.

The improvements involved and the assessments made to pay for the same, were had under the provisions of what is known in this case as the Taylor law, which for the purposes of this case must be considered valid, and that the lien of the *437assessments, under said law continues until they are paid. The lien still existing tolls the appropriate remedy for its enforcement.

Price, C. J., Shaucic, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
SCWC

- 13

- 000 5232

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I , Respondent/ Plaintiff

- Appellee
,

vs.

BYRON D. CHEEK

- ENRIQUES , Petitioner /Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 13

- 000 5232 ; CASE NO. 1 DTA

- 11

- 0 5193 )

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner / Defendant

- Appellant Byron D. Cheek

Enriques ’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on August

1 , 2015 , is hereby accepted without oral argument

.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days pursuant to Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0005232 15-SEP-2015 09:38 AM2 Rule 34(c) of the Hawai ʻ i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for

retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i
, September 1 5 , 2015

.
Jonathan Burge for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
No. 10376.

#### The City of Mansfield *v.*Maxwell.

Decided June 16, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Mr. G. M. Cummings,*city solicitor, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. H. L. Peeke,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Crew, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Environmental Release of Arneel 18i to Surface Waters during Manufacturing Background The PMN substance, known as Arneel 18i, is an isooctadecanenitrile (CAS No. 84924-24-3). Akzo Nobel manufactures the PMN substance at a single site, for use as a site limited intermediate. Environmental release of the PMN chemical during manufacture is expected to be minimal. Because the PMN chemical will be produced on a continuous batch basis at the Morris, Illinois plant facility, it is expected that release will only occur during routine maintenance runs, approximately twice per year; any waste material will be ultimately collected and disposed of in the FDCC where it is destroyed by thermal oxidation.

Potential of Release to Surface Water Reactor Cleaning The PMN Chemical Substance will be produced on a continuous batch basis at the Morris, Illinois plant facility, it is expected and the equipment utilized will not be cleaned out after each batch. It is estimated that the equipment cleaned is no more than 1-2 times per year and no more than 32 kg of the PMN chemical substance would be released as a result of each cleaning. The released material is disposed of in the FDCC where it is destroyed by thermal oxidation. Arneel 18i
n i sooctadecanenitrile (CAS No. 84924- 24 - 3 ). Arneel 18i , is a the PMN chemical will be produced on a continuous batch basis at the Morris, Illinois plant facility, it

produced on a continuous batch basis at the Morris, Illinois
EXHIBIT 24



                        POWER OF ATTORNEY


Know all men by these presents, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Robert N. Wildrick,
Russell E. Solt and Eugene Caldwell, and each of them, with full
power to act without the others, his true and lawful attorneys-
in-fact and agents with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any
and all capacities, to sign the annual report of Venture Stores,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 25, 1997, and
any and all amendments thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that each said attorney-in-fact and
agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.  

In witness whereof, the undersigned have executed this power of
attorney as of the 24th day of April, 1997.



/s/ Robert L. Berra                /s/ Kimberly A. Delsing  
Robert L. Berra                    Kimberly A. Delsing


/s/ Timothy F. Finley              /s/ H. Edwin Trusheim    
Timothy F.Finley                   H. Edwin Trusheim


/s/ Lawrence J. Young    
Lawrence J. Young
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9020]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4827]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Veterans' Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation; Notice of 
Availability of Annual Report

    Under Section 10(b) and Section 13 of Public Law 92-463 (Federal 
Advisory Committee Act), notice is hereby given that the Veterans' 
Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation Annual report for Fiscal Year 1995 
has been issued.
    The report summarizes activities of the Group relative to VA's 
rehabilitation program. It is available for inspection at two 
locations:

Federal Documents Section, Exchange and Gift Division, LM 632, Library 
of Congress, Washington, DC 20540

    and

Department of Veterans Affairs, Vocational Rehabilitation and 
Counseling Service (28), 1800 G St. N.W., Room 501, Washington, DC 
20420

    Dated February 19, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4827 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2792

LT Case No. 2017-302691-CFDB

_____________________________

RICARDO DAVON WATSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________ 

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. 

Leah R. Case, Judge. 

Ricardo Davon Watson, Live Oak, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. 

Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellee. 

April 9, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, HARRIS, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF FGI


FARMERS GROUP, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS FARMERS
UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION

-    Truck Underwriters Association, a California corporation

-    Fire Underwriters Association, a California corporation

-    F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation 1

-    Farmers New World Life Insurance Company, a Washington corporation

-    FIG Leasing Co., Inc., a California corporation 2

-    Prematic Service Corporation, a California corporation 3

-    Prematic Service Corporation, a Nevada corporation 4

-    Farmers Group Capital, a Delaware statutory business trust

-    Farmers Group Capital II, a Delaware statutory business trust

-    Farmers Investment Research & Management, a Nevada corporation

-    Farmers Underwriters Association, a California corporation (inactive)

-    F.I.G. Travel, a California corporation (inactive)

-    Farmers Services Corporation, a Nevada corporation

-    Farmers Value Added, Inc., a Nevada corporation

-    Farmers Reinsurance Company, a California corporation
 
1      Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters Association own 30%
and 70%, respectively, of the equity of F.I.G. Holding Company. 

2      FGI, Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters Association
own 95.2%, 3.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the equity of FIG Leasing Co.,
Inc..    

3      FGI, Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters Association
own 38%, 53% and 9%, respectively, of the equity of Prematic Service
Corporation, a California corporation.

4      Prematic Service Corporation, a California corporation, owns 100% of the
equity of Prematic Service Corporation, a Nevada corporation.
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                 July 5, 2007

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.     Other Events
- -------   --------------------------------------------

          As of June 30, 2007, preliminary assets under management totaled
$4.479 billion.  Following is a summary as of June 30, 2007 (in millions):

				         Equity    Fixed Income	    Total
Individually Managed Accounts 	        $   891	      $  134       $ 1,025
Mutual Funds (including sub-advised)      2,802	         174         2,976
Private Investment Funds	   	    478            0           478
                                        -------       ------       -------
Total			       	        $ 4,171       $  308       $ 4,479

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small and Small-Mid Cap	         $   734
Large Cap and Select		   1,062
Long-Short		           2,380
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     303
				--------
Total			           4,479


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: July 5, 2007	                     By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Secretary
---

**EXHIBIT 99.8**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the use of our report in this Annual Report
  on Form 40-F of Great Basin Gold Ltd. dated March 31, 2008 accompanying the
  consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report on Form
  40-F.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our Report
  in the Registration Statement on Form F-8 (No.333-141985 and 333-141484) and
  on Form F-10 (No. 333-141985).

*(Signed) “PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP”*

**Chartered Accountants**
  Vancouver, British Columbia 
  March 31, 2008

---