alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION*


(Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Finance)




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officers of QSGI INC., hereby certify, to such officers’
knowledge, that:




(1) the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QSGI INC. (the “Company”) for the
period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 14, 2009
                
                /s/ Marc ShermanMarc
      Sherman
                  Chairman
      of the Board and
                  Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      May 14, 2009
                
                /s/ Edward L. CummingsEdward
      L. Cummings
                  Vice
      President of Finance





__________________


* The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
KBS SOR Q4 2013 Exhibit 10.20






ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT OF SALE
THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT OF SALE (this “Assignment”), dated as of December 23, 2013, is made by and between 110 WILLIAM HOLDINGS III LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having an address at 10 East 53rd Street, 37th Floor, New York, New York 10022 (“Assignor”), and KBS SOR SREF III 110 WILLIAM, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having an address at 10 East 53rd Street, 37th Floor, New York New York 10022 (“Assignee”).
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, Assignor is the purchaser under that certain Agreement of Purchase and Sale dated December 4, 2013, by and between 110 William, LLC (“Seller”), as seller, and Assignor, as buyer (the “Contract”), with respect to the sale and purchase of certain real property and improvements located at 110 William, New York, New York (the “Property”), as more particularly described therein;


WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign, transfer, set over and deliver to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Contract; and
WHEREAS, Assignee desires to assume the performance of all of the rights, duties and obligations of Assignor under the Contract; 
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.    Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms in the Contract.
2.    Assignor hereby assigns and transfers to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the Contract, including, without limitation, the Deposit delivered by Assignor to Escrow Agent.
3.    Assignee hereby accepts the aforementioned assignment, assumes the performance of all of the rights, duties and obligations of Assignor under the Contract and agrees to be bound by all terms of the Contract.  
4.    This Assignment shall be governed by, and interpreted in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York, all rights and remedies being governed by such laws.
5.    This Assignment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 
6.    This Assignment may be executed and delivered by facsimile or electronically by email, each of which shall be deemed an original. 
7.    In accordance with section 10.9 of the Contract, a copy of this Assignment will be delivered to the Seller under the Contract.

1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have executed this Assignment as of the day and year first above written.
	
			
	ASSIGNOR:

	 
	 
	 

	110 WILLIAM HOLDINGS III, LLC,

	a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Nicholas Bienstock

	Name:
	Nicholas Bienstock

	Title: Authorized Signatory

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	ASSIGNEE:

	 
	 
	 

	KBS SOR SREF III 110 William, LLC

	a Delaware limited liability company

	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Nicholas Bienstock

	Name:
	Nicholas Bienstock

	Title: Authorized Signatory
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7500 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7500

    To limit further expansion of the 2001 Authorization for Use of 
                Military Force, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2020

   Mr. Brown of Maryland (for himself, Ms. Spanberger, Mr. Cole, Mr. 
 Bacon, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Woodall, Mr. Crow, Mr. Rooney of Florida, and 
  Mr. Yoho) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To limit further expansion of the 2001 Authorization for Use of 
                Military Force, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Limit on the Expansion of the 
Authorization for Use of Military Force Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON EXPANSION OF THE 2001 AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF 
              MILITARY FORCE.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 
U.S.C. 1541 note) may not be construed to provide authorization for the 
use of force, including under section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution 
(50 U.S.C. 1544(b)), in any country in which United States Armed Forces 
are not engaged in hostilities pursuant to such Authorization as of the 
date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act may be construed--
            (1) to deem the use of force in any country in which United 
        States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities as of the date 
        of the enactment of this Act as lawful or unlawful pursuant to 
        the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 
        50 U.S.C. 1541 note); or
            (2) as an authorization for use of military force.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gary Cicero VICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. EE-98.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 30, 1978.

Michael J. Minerva, Public Defender, Janice G. Scott and Theodore E. Mack, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael H. Davidson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The record and briefs in this cause have been carefully reviewed. The appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error and, therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed from are AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT A
P..PPAREL FOR 1-IER: CATEGORIES: OLITER\1'./EAR St-IOP: COATS 

See our complete Burberry collection. 

Click eacl1 picture to select. 

Outerwear Jacket 

Cardinal red. Allover quitted lopst~ching. Black faux-fur hood w~h snap-lab detail; 

zip/snap front. Long sleeves wtth zip cuff detail. Tonal bett at natural waist. Zip 

pockets. A-line. Polyesterlpolyamic!e. Made in ttaly of Imported material. 

Modern Size Oulde 

121 E-mail to a friend 

ttems Available 

Burben-y 

Outerwear Jacket 

Price: $1,295.00 

NMFlO_BOXSC 

Quant~y 

D 

View all< PRE VI NEXT> 

~eedH~Ip? 

• Call 1.888.888.4757 

·. •E~niail us 

~priniiectiat· 

• • stiihi\irig Information 

• Return Policy 

• Sjl:e Gyic!~s 

Available Sizes/Colors 

First, Select Size 

Then, Select Color 

\AD!:l fO SHOPPING !lAG 
EXHIBIT B
. ·. . ... "} l~~-· 

I 
EXHIBIT C
''· 

' 

}. 

' ! 

~ 

f. 

. ' 

I. 

~: 

./ 

···~~~~,."'-'! ... ··~·,,;. 

. ...... . 

. ·. 

.. . . 
EXHIBIT D
. I' 

STUART WEilZMAN. Cola or black lycra® 

and leather "Flex Mode" bootie with 3 W 

wedge heel. full and half sizes 

5-1 OB, 11 B. Spain. 

3A Bootie Orig. 365.00 

NOW215.00* 

STUART WEllZMAN. Black suede "Forever" 

boot with cotton and viscose faux-fur cuff and 

rubber sole. Full and half sizes 5-1 OB, 11 B, 

12B, 7-1 oM: Spain. 

3B Boot Orig. 345.00 

NOW 205.00" 

STUART WEitzMAN. Black or coia suede 

. "Furball" ballet flat with dyed min.k (Spain) 

.pouf, rubber sole, and ~· wedge heel. Black, 

full and half sizes 5-71hB, 9%-12B, 7M, 

8-1 OM. Cola, full and half sizes 5-1 OB, 

11B, 12B, 7M, 9%-lOM. Spain. 

3C Black Fur-trim Ballet Flat Orig. 325.00 

NOW195.00* 

3D Cola Fur-trim Ballet Flat Orig. 325.00 

NOW195.00* 

STUART WEilZMAN. Black water;esistant 

Gore-T ex® and patent leather ankle boot with 

. . leather sole and 2"'wedge heel. Full and half 

sizes 5-1 OB, 11 B, 12B, 7-1 OM. Spain. 

3E Boot Orig. 450.00 

NOW270.00* 

. I 

l 

. ! 

. I 

! 
EXHIBIT E
.i. .. FREE:SHIPPING• 

•···WJttn:ode FALLFS 

DESIGNERS WOMEN'S APPAREl SHOES. RANO:BAGS JEWELRY jl(CCES~~IES 

(29 of 93) (PREY I NEXP 

Alll:e +. Olivia 

Kyah Faux.-Fur-CollarQoat, Edie.Ptinted 

Leather-Front L!:!gg[rlgs 

this anMack Alice ii- Olivialpolfb:oas;ts uptown .arid· 

l!;lalnerpeJrtiS an~ a'glejfi\OYQU$ 'faux • .fUY•PO!Iar cpa!'; 

top;.· 

it. Pr:intect ge9rgette, • $Prel!ct cQIJar;plilcRet<frqnt .. 

• ·l:tiree'"q~aitersl~eves. 

• t.:ocise'.silnoueti~. • · 

•. Arched:hertihi!S below hip •• 

• · Sllk/sp!lnlifex. 

• Dry cl~ari: 

• lmportetL 

Shi!W:l:eather .Front Leggings: Shiny 1eatf1eu· puts your goiriq••JIJ!" loo1is:on.trenc1·1n 

AU"=~+· Oliviif Kyah:f~ux~.F•wtoll.ar.'Caat 

$798,!)0: . NMFl3 T5F06 

i~·;810C\? 

I Firstj.SeJecl,Size li; 

I ThenJ S'i!lect color li MODE~M 8tZE G!JfDE 

I First. s~lec;t $ize I [:!~~~!.~~!_e~c_t-~~r~~ I 

M:OOERN SIZE G:UIOE 
.,. FRJ;ESHIPPlNG• 

"''·,WHI{code FALLFS 

~fn~u$ · Qnll~i:i·:Chfl! 

$r,ipp[i'f£J.·Jrif6rtrn:llior,. 

~~tut~ F>aiic~~ · · sit¥Pui•~!'i~: .. 

I First1 SeJect,size ·Ill 

I 'rhen) select color' Jl M6DERN'BtZ:E~lJIBE 

lFJb~t~,$~1e!f<t$i~e 1· 

l!he~;~~~:~~~E~!~~JjJ ~~\:IQERNSIZ!=: GtJibE
#### Eduardo Hernandez, Respondent, v City of New York, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Pierre Hotel, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[736 NYS2d 604]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Plug, J.), dated January 16, 2000, which granted the plaintiff’s motion to restore the action to the trial calendar and denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the third-party defendant separately appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the order as granted the plaintiff’s motion to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contentions, the plaintiff was not required to demonstrate the elements necessary to restore an action to the trial calendar established under CPLR 3404 *(see generally, Basetti v Nour,*287 AD2d 126). We agree with the Supreme Court that the evidence demonstrated that the case in fact was not marked off, struck from the calendar, or unanswered on a clerk’s calendar call. Rather, the evidence indicated that the case was marked discontinued as a result of a clerk’s error. Thus, the case was not subject to the provisions of CPLR 3404, and the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion and restored the action to its prior place on the calendar.

In addition, the Supreme Court properly denied the belated motion of the appellant City of New York for summary judgment *(see,*CPLR 3212 [a]; *Neves v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*265 AD2d 393, 394). Ritter, Acting P.J., Feuerstein, Goldstein, Friedmann and Crane, JJ., concur.
10.6 - Term Note AgStar






TERM NOTE
	
		
	$13,333,333.34
	February 27, 2014






FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HIGHWATER ETHANOL, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of AgStar Financial Services, PCA (the “Bank”), the principal sum of $13,333,333.34.  The Borrower further agrees to pay interest in like money to the Bank on the unpaid principal amount hereof from time to time outstanding at the rates and on the dates specified in the Credit Agreement (as defined below), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement; all such payments, unless sooner paid, shall be made no later than the Maturity Date.  All capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Credit Agreement.


This Term Note is one of the Term Notes evidencing the Term Loan referred to in that certain Credit Agreement of even date herewith, among the Borrower, the Bank and the other commercial, banking or financial institutions from time to time parties thereto, and AgStar Financial Services, PCA, as Administrative Agent (the “Agent”) (such agreement, as it may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”).    


This Term Note is subject to prepayment as provided in the Credit Agreement.


This Term Note is secured as provided in the Loan Documents.  Reference is hereby made to the Loan Documents for a description of the properties and assets in which a mortgage, security interest or other lien has been granted, the nature and extent of the security, and the terms and conditions upon which such mortgages, liens and security interests were granted and the rights of the Bank in respect thereof.  


Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of any one or more of the Events of Default set forth in Section 6.01 of the Credit Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Term Note shall, at the election of the Agent, be immediately due and payable, all as provided in the Credit Agreement.


The Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and dishonor of this Term Note.


This Term Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota (without reference to the choice of law principles thereof).


The Borrower hereby submits to the jurisdiction of any Minnesota State court sitting in Blue Earth County, Minnesota, or Federal court sitting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Term Note, and the Borrower hereby agrees that claims in respect of such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in such Minnesota State court or in such Federal court.  The Borrower hereby waives, to the fullest extent it may effectively do so, the defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such action or proceeding.


	
		
	 
	HIGHWATER ETHANOL, LLC, a Minnesota

	 
	limited liability company

	 
	 

	 
	/s/ Brian Kletscher

	 
	By: Brian Kletscher

	 
	Its: Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Neal C. NARCHO v. FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CADDO et al.

No. 54329.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1974.

In re: Neal C. Narcho,. applying for Writ of Mandamus and/or Remedial Writs, Prohibition and Habeas Corpus.

Application denied. The trial judge was correct in his reasons for denying the writ.
#### Harry GRAYS v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38270.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------



|SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
|-------------------------



|In accordance with
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the  undersigned Chief Financial Officer
of Registrant hereby certifies to his  knowledge that this annual report of Registrant on
Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d)  of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in  this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial  condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: March 12, 2004 | /s/ R. Brent Lenczycki, CPA
      R. Brent Lenczycki, CPA 
      Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and 
      Accounting Officer)
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                 EXHIBIT 23 (a)

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




The Board of Directors
Oxford Health Plans, Inc.:

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-49738, 33-70908, 333-988, 333-28109, 333-35693, 33-94242 and 333-79063)
on Form S-8 of Oxford Health Plans, Inc. of our reports dated February 10, 2000,
except for the last paragraph of Notes 6 and 7 as to which the date is March 3,
2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Oxford Health Plans, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive
earnings (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period
ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual
report on Form 10-K of Oxford Health Plans, Inc.


                                        Ernst & Young LLP



New York, New York
March 20, 2000


                                       90
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          19,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    537,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               597,200
<PP&E>                                         287,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 110,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 829,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          267,100
<BONDS>                                        280,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   829,100
<SALES>                                        578,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               578,100
<CGS>                                          309,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  572,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,100)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)


</TABLE>
#### Martin HERNDON, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI et al., Respondents.

No. 40805.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 759 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 759

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-
Coushatta Tribes of Texas Equal and Fair Opportunity Settlement Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    The Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian Tribes 
of Texas Restoration Act (Public Law 100-89; 101 Stat. 666) is amended 
by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 301. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preclude or limit the 
applicability of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 
seq.).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 759

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To restore an opportunity for tribal economic development on terms that 
              are equal and fair, and for other purposes.
```
REGULATORY EVA UAnON

Directorate Identifier: 2009-NM-260-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have asignificant economic impact on aSlbstantial number ofsmal] entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect mtrastate aviation inAJaska. Is itappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated 

### in Alaska, where avdtion might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)