alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**DPL Inc.**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 

OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officerof DPL Inc. (the “Issuer”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2009, which this certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuers asof the dates and for the periods expressed therein.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thisstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuers and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
| /s/ Paul M. Barbas                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul M. Barbas                         |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

Date: October 28,2009

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Issuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-4501

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUVENILE MALE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (2:10-cr-00036-RGD-FBS-1)

Submitted: September 23, 2010 Decided: October 13, 2010

Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew A. Protogyrou, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, P.L.C., Norfolk, 

Virginia, for Appellant. Neil H. MacBride, United States 

Attorney, William D. Muhr, Richard D. Cooke, Assistant United 

States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

By way of this interlocutory appeal, Juvenile Male 

(“J.M.”), who was sixteen years old when he was charged as a 

delinquent,*

We conclude the Government’s assertion that there was 

a substantial federal interest at stake was sufficient. See

United States v. T.M., 413 F.3d 420, 424-27 (4th Cir. 2005). We 

further conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion

in granting the Government’s motion to transfer the case to 

adult criminal proceedings. United States v. Juvenile Male, 554 

F.3d 456, 460, 468 (4th Cir. 2009). The nature of the charges 

challenges the district court’s order granting the 

Government’s motion to transfer proceedings against a juvenile 

to adult criminal proceedings. J.M. claims that the 

Government’s certification to proceed under the Juvenile Justice 

and Delinquency Prevention Act was insufficient because it 

failed to properly assert that there was a substantial federal 

interest. He also claims the district court abused its 

discretion in granting the Government’s motion to transfer the 

case to adult criminal proceedings. Finding no error, we 

affirm.

 * 18 U.S.C. § 5038(e) (2006) provides that “[u]nless a 

juvenile . . . is prosecuted as an adult neither the name nor 

picture of any juvenile shall be made public in connection with 

a juvenile delinquency proceeding.”
3

clearly warranted the transfer. United States v. Robinson, 404 

F.3d 850, 858 (4th Cir. 2005). We also conclude the court did 

not clearly err in finding J.M.’s leadership role in the offense

and his response to rehabilitative efforts warranted transfer. 

See 18 U.S.C. § 5032 (2006). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12176]



[[Page 26489]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; NIMH Psychoactive Drug Screening Program (PDSP).
    Date: June 19, 2018.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Vinod Charles, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6151, 
MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-1606, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20434841524c45535649604d41494c0e4e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c6cdc4d7c9c0d6d3cce5c8c4ccc98bcbcccd8bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 31, 2018.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-12176 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

March 25, 2005

S.M. Oliva

President & CEO

The Voluntary Trade Council

Post Office Box 100073

Arlington, Virginia 22210

Re: In the Matter of Cemex S.A. de C.V., a corporation

File No. 051 0007, Docket No. C-4131 

Dear Mr. Oliva:

Thank you for your comments on behalf of The Voluntary Trade Council (“VTC”)

regarding the proposed consent order accepted by the Federal Trade Commission for public

comment in the above-captioned matter. Your letter states, inter alia, that

[s]ince the Commission lacked the constitutional authority to issue its complaint against

Cemex, the subsequent proposed order is void, and thus no further public interest

determination is necessary.

VTC Public Comment at 11. The Commission has reviewed your comments in connection with

its decision concerning whether to accord final approval to the proposed consent order, and has

also placed your comments on the public record.

After appropriate consideration of your comments, the Commission has determined that

the public interest would best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without

modification. A copy of the final Decision and Order is enclosed for your information. Relevant

materials also are available from the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov.

It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work on

antitrust and consumer protection issues, and we appreciate your interest in this matter.

By direction of the Commission, Chairman Majoras recused.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80-81]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34190]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Agency Recordkeeping/Reporting Requirements Under Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

    Title: Native Employment Works (NEW) Program Plan Guidance and 
Report Requirements.
    OMB No.: New.
    Description: The purpose of this document is to determine whether a 
Tribal plan is complete and will fulfill its intended purpose, goals 
and objectives to provide work activities. The plan will provide an 
outline of how the Tribe's program will be administered and operated 
and instructions for reporting program characteristics. It is also used 
to provide the public with information about the NEW program.
    Respondents: States, Puerto Rico, Guam and the District of 
Columbia.
    Annual Burden Estimates:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                            Number of     Average               
                                                               Number of    responses      burden       Total   
                         Instrument                           respondents      per       hours per      burden  
                                                                            respondent    response      hours   
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program Plan................................................           78            1           40        3,120
Operations Report...........................................           78            1           16        1,248
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,368.
    Additional Information: ACF is requesting that OMB grant a 180 day 
approval for this information collection under procedures for emergency 
processing by February 17, 1998. A copy of this information collection, 
with applicable supporting documentation, may be obtained by calling 
the Administration for Children and Families, Acting Reports Clearance 
Officer, Bob Sargis at (202) 690-7275.
    Comments and questions about the information collection described 
above should be directed, prior to the request date, to the Office of 
Information and

[[Page 81]]

Regulatory Affairs, Attn: OMB Desk Officer for ACF, Office of 
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, 725 17th Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20503, (202) 395-7316.

    Dated: December 22, 1997.
Bob Sargis,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-34190 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Raymond LONDON.

No. 60861.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 27, 1978.

Loyola Law School Clinic, Arthur A. Lemann, III, Supervising Atty., Barrie Byrnes, Student Practitioner, William R. Ary, Trial Counsel, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Con-nick, Dist. Atty., Louise S. Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Raymond London was indicted by the Grand Jury for first degree murder, a violation of La.R.S. 14:30. After trial by jury he was found guilty as charged. After a sentencing hearing, the same jury which had determined defendant’s guilt recommended a sentence of life imprisonment without benefit of probation, parole or suspension of sentence, rather than death. The trial judge imposed the recommended sentence.

We have reviewed each of defendant’s twelve assignments of error and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1








June 11, 2014Analyst Contact:T.D. Eureste918-588-7167Media Contact:Stephanie Higgins918-591-5026








ONEOK Partners to Participate in the J.P. Morgan Energy Infrastructure/MLP Corporate Access Day





TULSA, Okla. – June 11, 2014 – ONEOK Partners, L.P. (NYSE: OKS) will participate in J.P. Morgan’s Third Annual Energy Infrastructure/MLP One-on-One Corporate Access Day on Thursday, June 12, 2014, in Chicago, Illinois.





Robert F. Martinovich, ONEOK Partners executive vice president, commercial, will conduct a series of one-on-one meetings with investment-community representatives at the conference.





The materials utilized at the conference will be accessible on ONEOK Partners’ website, www.oneokpartners.com , on Thursday, June 12, beginning at 8 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (7 a.m. Central Daylight Time).








ONEOK Partners, L.P. (pronounced ONE-OAK) (NYSE: OKS) is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships in the United States and is a leader in the gathering, processing, storage and transportation of natural gas in the U.S. and owns one of the nation’s premier natural gas liquids (NGL) systems, connecting NGL supply in the Mid-Continent and Rocky Mountain regions with key market centers.  Its general partner is a wholly owned subsidiary of ONEOK, Inc. (NYSE: OKE), a pure-play, publicly traded general partner, which owns 38.8  percent of the overall partnership interest as of May 16, 2014.





For more information, visit the website at www.oneokpartners.com .





For the latest news about ONEOK Partners, follow us on Twitter @ONEOKPartners .








###
258 La. 358

#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. Sherman David LEDFORD and Dave’s Flying Service, Inc.

No. 51280.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Sherman David Ledford and Dave’s Flying Service, Inc. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 244 So.2d 252.

Writ denied. On the facts by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23(a)

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

VIMRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Wilmington, Delaware

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on form S-8 (File Nos. 333-03106 and 333-15693) of our report dated March 14,
1997 on the consolidated financial statements of VIMRx Pharmaceuticals Inc. and
subsidiaries (the "Company") as at December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995 and
for each of the years in the three-year period then ended and the amounts for
such years included in the period December 30, 1986 (inception) to December 31,
1996, included in the Company's 1996 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company LLP
New York, New York
March 30, 1998
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 773 

To terminate the EB–5 program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. KING of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To terminate the EB–5 program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF EB–5 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) REPEAL OF PROVISIONS.—Effective on the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act, the following provisions are 

6 repealed: 

7 (1) Section 203(b)(5) of the Immigration and 

8 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(5)). 

9 (2) Section 204(a)(1)(H) of the Immigration 

10 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1154(a)(1)(H)). 

11 (3) Section 216A of the Immigration and Na12 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1186b). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 773 IH

1 (4) Section 610 of the Departments of Com2 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Re3 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1993 (8 U.S.C. 

4 1153 note). 

5 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Beginning on the date of the 

6 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Secu7 rity— 

8 (1) shall cease to accept petitions and applica9 tions under any authority repealed under subsection 

10 (a); and 

11 (2) shall dismiss all pending petitions and appli12 cations described in paragraph (1). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7585 

To amend the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park Establishment Act of 2000 to provide for additional areas 

to be added to the park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2020 

Mr. DESAULNIER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front 

National Historical Park Establishment Act of 2000 to 

provide for additional areas to be added to the park, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROSIE THE RIVETER/WORLD WAR II HOME 

4 FRONT NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK ADDI5 TIONS. 

6 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

7 ‘‘Rosie the Riveter National Historic Site Expansion Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7585 IH

1 (b) ADDITIONS.—The Rosie the Riveter/World War 

2 II Home Front National Historical Park Establishment 

3 Act of 2000 (16 U.S.C. 410ggg et seq.) is amended as 

4 follows: 

5 (1) In section 2(b), by adding at the end the 

6 following: ‘‘Not later than 180 days after areas are 

7 added to the park administratively or by Federal 

8 law, the Secretary shall update the map to include 

9 the added areas.’’. 

10 (2) By adding at the end of section 2, the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(c) ADDITIONAL AREAS INCLUDED.—In addition to 

13 areas included under subsection (b), the park shall include 

14 the following: 

15 ‘‘(1) The Nystrom Elementary School–The 

16 Maritime Building, as listed on the National Reg17 ister of Historic Places. 

18 ‘‘(2) Such other areas as the Secretary deems 

19 appropriate.’’. 

20 (3) By amending section 3(e)(2) to read as fol21 lows: 

22 ‘‘(2) OTHER PROPERTY.—Within the bound23 aries of the park, the Secretary may acquire lands, 

24 improvements, waters, or interests therein, by dona25 tion, purchase, exchange or transfer. Any lands, or 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7585 IH

1 interests therein, owned by the State of California or 

2 any political subdivision thereof, may be acquired 

3 only by donation. When any tract of land is only 

4 partly within such boundaries, the Secretary may ac5 quire all or any portion of the land outside of such 

6 boundaries in order to minimize the payment of sev7 erance costs. Land so acquired outside of the bound8 aries may be exchanged by the Secretary for non9 Federal lands within the boundaries. Any portion of 

10 land acquired outside the boundaries and not used 

11 for exchange shall be reported to the General Serv12 ices Administration for disposal for not less than 

13 fair market value under chapter 1 of title 40, United 

14 States Code.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Ex parte STATE of Alabama ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL.

77-301.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 25, 1978.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., and Mary Jane LeCroy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, petitioner.

Donald E. Brutkiewicz, Mobile, for respondent.

MADDOX, Justice.

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TORBERT, C. J., and JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
M.0$-i3-0030Z.-CiL ......

isaa&zo &ambz, n\t the cw&of cnxMrtinu

ArpzuLANT, flPPeALs roft th^%trte &?

$7'/lT£ or 7£*AS, 0F CWM/NAL APP£ALS

•APRGIL&. SEP 17 2Q15

Abel Acosta, Clerk _.._ /VW COMBS t MMLZO&AMeZ.n&5015*i . NpeLLAiJT XVXftE

tzLe /? sr.A/&,te copy aa/0 ^ho^ss thxs ccaupx&co& cftu%e to '

GlktthjT TH%S MQTZQhJ AS FOLuOu/S',

i). Tne APpet-uiAsr £3 eumzfisTLv XAenacezftrTBD xaj me

T.QC*rt --CZD. 6OR^0CTrOh\jBL. ZA/$TXTlA'fXOU AMQ CMIU#j®T pgovxibg :

&?Prfs gecnu&z /^pp^lla/ut Does, /jot nav& Access to a GoPxa/Gi ,

A4i4t$4XA/&'trtA/Of

2) thF RPpeu-AA/r'v 6owv%€<-ksfiscougr APPoxtjreto a/jo

c&u/zr.

juMeaBro^ pzeMzstts* CoN$rDm&b,APPeuuAMr ezAYs.+Hinr

TUXS Cdu&T i,J£LL GfiA/sT TttCS WMXOM TOFXct? A SXA/ai& COP?

Atso HAve rft&. cusm*- orrne csha&x to aa&kb eoi%^ ro &o

Tojtier g0GuuxiLeD PttUVfBS*

x / AtoitXD && rnez j*iQZcn s H, &&£*/£*. -cjjcfrncgfcft reo xas rne

TOCJX.-CZp,...ti.H.COfTfetO UfaXT ICAJ ftAJ&6RSQKt' cou/vtJ^teyn^no

mCCftPZ THAT Tt4B f&k &GXaJG XS T'£UB ArJD CCmjieCT urvO&Z Ttic

peAsncry or pePLjuoy.

gxjscuTco^rtfxs £&oayo^sePreM&EP-,2015

HtseeCWuLLV ^uB.Mxrreb, OQURTOFCnMMALAPPEMB ^^^^**y>nW

SEP 08 2015 COFTZGU) (JNjrr

t.c-pxce
#### NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Petitioner, v. Samuel H. BARLOW, Respondent.

No. 41205.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 14, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                     6,505,324
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,240,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                2,988,039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          10,985,596
<PP&E>                                       748,759
<DEPRECIATION>                               219,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            14,249,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        779,111
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     232,067
<OTHER-SE>                                20,878,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              14,249,813
<SALES>                                    7,036,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           7,177,069
<CGS>                                      2,856,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,856,261
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           6,155,745
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (1,834,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  26,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (1,869,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                              (1,860,937)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.12)
                            


</TABLE>