alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E L ME R AL E XA ND E R L E I VA - DE L E ON , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 70282 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 120- 777 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E l m erA l exander L ei va-D e L eon, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f

r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is m o tio n to 

# FI LED JU L 24 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 70282 2 re op en re m ov alproceedi ng s c on du ct ed i n absent i a. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e d is m is s in p art an dd e n yin p art th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o c ons i de rL e i va - D e L e on’ s s ol e c ont e nt i on, r e gar di ng the pr a c t i c abi l i tyof

pe r s ona l s e rvi c e , be c aus e i tw a s note xhaus t e d be f or e the a g e n c y . See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 678 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . L e i va - D e L e on ha s w a i ve d anyc ha l l e nge t o the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i ons r e g ar d in g d e liv e ryo f

h is h e ar in g n o tic e an dc h an g e dc o u n tryc o n d itio n s . See M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 9 4 F .3 d1 2 5 6 , 1 2 5 9 - 6 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 6 ) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D I S M I S S E D in p a r t ; D E N I E D in p a r t .
No. 10515.

#### The City of Columbus *v.*The Columbus Public Service Co. et al.

Decided March 3, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Franklin county.

*Mr. George S. Marshall,*city solicitor; *Mr. Edgar Weinland*and *Fred R. Hoover,*assistant city solicitors, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Thomas H. Clark; Mr. Franklin Rubrecht*and *Messrs. Safer, Seymour & Safer,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Amerifa Construction Company ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W917PM-06-C-0026 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61167 

Stephen M. Seeger, Esq. 

Michael C. Zisa, Esq. 

Peckar & Abramson, P.C. 

Washington, DC . 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

James D. Stephens, Esq. 

Aimee L. Rider, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East 

Winchester, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: June 11, 2019 

dministrative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61167, Appeal of Amerifa 

Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6031

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RONALD EUSTACH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (4:00-cr-00067-CMC-2; 4:02-cv-04279-CMC-2)

Submitted: April 17, 2008 Decided: April 23, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Eustach, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Eustach seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reconsideration of the denial of

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Eustach has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny

Eustach’s motion to expand the certificate of appealability, and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7647 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7647

To provide for a COVID-19-related delay regarding annual limitation on 
  cost-sharing for group health plans and individual and small group 
                       health insurance coverage.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 16, 2020

   Mr. McEachin (for himself, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, and Mrs. 
 Watson Coleman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees 
    on Education and Labor, and Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a COVID-19-related delay regarding annual limitation on 
  cost-sharing for group health plans and individual and small group 
                       health insurance coverage.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COVID-19-RELATED DELAY REGARDING ANNUAL LIMITATION ON COST-
              SHARING FOR GROUP HEALTH PLANS AND INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL 
              GROUP HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE.

    For a plan or policy year that begins on or after January 1, 2020, 
and prior to the first calendar year that begins on or after the date 
that is twelve months after the end of the public health emergency 
first declared by the Secretary of Health and Human Services on January 
27, 2020, with respect to the 2019 Novel Coronavirus--
            (1) section 156.130(h) of title 45, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, as published in the Federal Register on May 14, 
        2020, shall not apply; and
            (2) with respect to a group health plan or an issuer of 
        individual or small group health insurance coverage (as such 
        terms are defined in section 2791 of the Public Health Service 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 300gg-91)), the Secretary of the Treasury, the 
        Secretary of Labor, and the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services shall enforce section 156.130(h) of title 45, Code of 
        Federal Regulations, as published in the Federal Register on 
        April 25, 2019, and in effect on October 1, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lathan BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S—191.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
10.19  SONY
COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC.  LATIN AMERICA RIDER TO THE PLAYSTATION® 2 CD-ROM/DVD-ROM
LICENSED PUBLISHER AGREEMENT  This Latin America Rider to the
PlayStation® 2 CD-ROM/DVD-ROM Licensed Publisher Agreement(the Rider)
is entered into by THQ, Inc. (Publisher) and Sony Computer Entertainment
America Inc. (SCEA) and rendered effective as of this 17thday of
December, 2008 (the Effective Date).  1.             Incorporation  The Riders terms and conditions are incorporated into
and read in conjunction with the terms and conditions of the PlayStation 2
CD-ROM/DVD-ROM Licensed Publisher Agreement Signed by Publisher (PS2 LPA)
along with any and all other riders to the PS2 LPA executed between Publisher
and SCEA.  2.             Definitions  All capitalized words and phrases referenced in the
Rider that are not expressly defined herein shall have the meanings set forth
in the Definitions section of the PS2 LPA.  3.             Territory  A.            Pursuant
to this Rider, the Territory for the PS2 LPA shall now consist of the following
geographic areas:  (1)           North
America (including all territories and possessions of the United States);  (2)           Central
America; and  (3)           South
America.  B.            SCEA
can modify and amend the Territory from time and time during the Term by
providing written notice of any such changes to Publisher.  In the event that a specific country is
deleted from the Territory, SCEA shall deliver to Publisher a written notice
stating the number of days within which Publisher must cease distributing
Licensed Products and must retrieve any Development Tools located in that
deleted country.  C.            Publisher
shall not, directly or indirectly, solicit orders for or sell any Units of
Licensed Products in any situation where Publisher knows or reasonably should
know that any of such Licensed Products may be exported or resold outside of
the Territory.  4.             Payment
Logistics  All payments to be made to SCEA pursuant to the terms
and conditions of the PS2 LPA and any rider shall be made to SCEA either: 1)
directly from Publisher if Publisher is domiciled in the United States, or 2)
indirectly from a United States-domiciled affiliate, associate, branch office,
or subsidiary of Publisher (Designee) if Publisher is domiciled in a location
in the Territory other that the United States. It is the sole responsibility
and cost of the Publisher to establish its Designee.


5.             Governing
Law  This Rider shall be governed by and interpreted in
accordance with the laws of the State of California, excluding that body of law
related to choice of laws, and of the United States of America.  6.             Conflict
Resolution  In the event that any of the terms and conditions of
this Rider shall conflict with any terms and conditions of the PS2 LPA or any
other rider previously entered into by the parties, the terms of this Rider
shall prevail.   ACCEPTED AND AGREED:  Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc.
  
  THQ, Inc.By:
  
  
  By:Name:
  
  Name:Title:
  
  Title:Date:
  
  Date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,606
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         333,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                 150,434
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,377
<OTHER-SE>                                         307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,612
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,428)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.50)
        

</TABLE>
#### Krug et al. *v.*Roberts.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18180

Decided December 26, 1923.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.

*Mr. W. S. Rhotehamel*and *Mr. I. L. Jacobson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John Dineen,*for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                             560
<SECURITIES>                                 3,199,558
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,941,528
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,941,528
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          383,746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,941,528
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,902,687
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  712,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,190,337
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
May 1, 2004:

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Del Global  Technologies  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  period  ended  May 1,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Walter
F. Schneider,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350,  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section  15(d),  as applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                           /s/ Walter F. Schneider
                                          -------------------------
                                          Name: Walter F. Schneider
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          Date: June 15, 2004

      (1)   A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906
            has  been  provided  to Del  Global  Technologies  Corp  and will be
            retained  by Del Global  Technologies  Corp.  and  furnished  to the
            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
            U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
            as a separate disclosure document.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
     the financial  statements of Farrel  Corporation  as of 4/2/00 and for
     the  quarterly  period then ended and is  qualified in its entirety by
     reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000034645
<NAME>                        Farrel Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                         US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-2-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                     15,661
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,974
<PP&E>                                          23,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,465
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,183
<SALES>                                         11,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,437
<CGS>                                            9,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,171
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (72)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       686
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,480)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,480)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.28)



</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

GRACO INC.,

a corporation, Docket No. 9350

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC.,
a corporation, and

ITW FINISHING LLC,
a limited liability company.

Vee eee we He SH SS DY

CONSENT TO MODIFIED DECISION AND ORDER

Graco Inc., Hlinois Tool Works Inc., and ITW Finishing LLC (collectively,
Respondents), by their attorneys, hereby consent and agree to be bound by the terms of the
modified Decision and Order and all of its appendices, which Commission staff sent to
Respondents by electronic transmission dated August 14, 2014.

Respondents further reaffirm all of their admissions, and their agreement to all
statements, representations, waivers and other terms, and their obligation to continue to comply
with all requirements set forth in: (1) the Agreement by and between Respondents and Complaint
Counsel, dated March 12, 2012; (2) the Agreement Containing Consent Orders in Docket No.
9350, dated March 12, 2012; (3) the Order to Hold Separate and Maintain Assets issued and
served by the Commission on March 26, 2012; and (4) the Decision and Order accepted for
public comment by the Commission on May 29, 2012 (to the extent its terms are not superseded
by the terms of the modified Decision and Order and appendices).

GRACO INC, ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC, and
ITW FINISHING LLC

War

By:
fohpD. Graubert J. Robert Robertson
Covington & Burling LLP Hogan Lovells US LLP TM—
Counsel for Graco Inc. Counsel for Illinois Tool Works Inc.

and ITW Finishing LLC

Date: Agee 28, 204 Date: August? 2-8, 20/4
xo AG ; —
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3173

___________

Martin Lindstedt, Republican *

Candidate for Governor of Missouri, *

also known as Mad Dog, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Matt Blunt, Secretary of State and *

Chief Election Official of Missouri, * [UNPUBLISHED]

also known as Runt, and Rival *

Republican Candidate for Governor *

of Missouri; Robin Carnahan, *

Secretary of State, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 13, 2006

Filed: June 16, 2006

___________

Before ARNOLD, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________
1

The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

-2-

PER CURIAM.

The district court1

 dismissed Martin Lindstedt’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after

concluding that Mr. Lindstedt had filed it for the improper purpose of harassment.

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b). The court then denied Mr. Lindstedt’s Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 59(e) motion for reconsideration. Mr. Lindstedt appeals. We find

no abuse of discretion in either the dismissal of Mr. Lindstedt’s complaint, or the

denial of his Rule 59(e) motion. See Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384,

405 (1990) (reviewing Rule 11 determinations for abuse of discretion); Innovative

Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Assocs., 141 F.3d 1284, 1286 (8th Cir. 1998)

(reviewing denial of Rule 59(e) motions for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we

affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________