alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States of America 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary 

 August 11, 2014 

Gloria Aronson 

Massachusetts 

RE: In the Matter of Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc., 

Docket No. C-4423 

Dear Ms. Aronson: 

 Thank you for the comment, which you submitted electronically on June 6, 2014, in connection with Service Corporation International’s (“SCI”) Petition for Approval of Proposed Divestiture to Legacy Funeral Holdings, Inc. (“Legacy”), placed on the public record on June 6, 

2014. The Commission has also placed your comment on the public record and has given it 

careful consideration. 

 

 In your comment, you suggest that large corporations are taking over the funeral industry, 

a practice that you seem to dislike. It is unclear if you feel that the divestiture to Legacy is an 

example of a large corporate takeover. In determining whether to approve a proposed buyer, the 

Commission does not necessarily consider the size of the proposed acquirer and, as a factual 

matter, the Commission has approved divestitures in the funeral services industry to firms of 

varying sizes. 

 To evaluate a proposed buyer, the Commission considers whether the buyer is one that 

can maintain or restore competition to pre-acquisition levels. This is determined through evaluation of the proposed buyer’s financial and competitive viability, and whether it will likely remedy the competitive concerns alleged in the Commission’s complaint in the relevant market.1

 

 In evaluating SCI’s petition, the Commission analyzed all of the information available to 

it against the goal of restoring competition, including all public comments. The Commission reviewed Legacy’s ability to manage and operate funeral home businesses as well as its financial 

resources. After careful consideration of your comment, the Commission has determined to approve the proposed divestiture. We arrived at this decision because the relief obtained pursuant 

to the order appropriately addresses the competitive concerns arising from the acquisition. 

 

1

 See Negotiating Merger Remedies, http://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/merger-remedies#An 

Acceptable Buyer. 
2 

 It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work on antitrust and consumer protection issues, and we appreciate your interest in this matter. 

 By direction of the Commission. 

 Donald S. Clark 

 Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          69,962
<SECURITIES>                                37,187,278
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    158,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,802,135
<PP&E>                                       1,020,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                 610,180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,250,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,608,895
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        53,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,641,893
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,250,788
<SALES>                                      1,188,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,325,114
<CGS>                                          775,876
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,127,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              62,619
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,198,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                   107,624
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   222,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
# Službeni list C 253E/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1088
  doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.253.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 253E |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | 563 rujna 2013. |

ISSN 1977-1088

doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.253.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 253E

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

563 rujna 2013.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Europski parlament |
| 2013/C 253E/01 | Obavijest za čitatelje | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europski parlament

2013/C 253E/01

Obavijest za čitatelje

1

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

OBAVIJESTI INSTITUCIJA, TIJELA, UREDA I AGENCIJA EUROPSKE UNIJE

Europski parlament

| 3.9.2013 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CE 253/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2013

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CE 253/1

---

OBAVIJEST ZA ČITATELJE

Rezolucije Europskog parlamenta objavljene u drugim jezičnim verzijama u ovom izdanju Službenog lista usvojene su prije pristupanja Hrvatske Europskoj uniji te stoga nisu prevedene na hrvatski.

---
162 3001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman

Maureen K. Ohlhausen

Terrell McSweeny

________________________________________________

In the Matter of

BEYOND COASTAL, a limited liability company. DOCKET NO. C-4585

_______________________________________________

COMPLAINT

The Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Beyond Coastal, a limited 

liability company, has violated the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, and it 

appearing to the Commission that this proceeding is in the public interest, alleges:

1. Respondent Beyond Coastal is a Utah limited liability company with its principal 

office or place of business at 2424 South 2570 West, Salt Lake City, Utah 84119.

2. Respondent has advertised, labeled, offered for sale, sold, and distributed products 

to consumers, including Natural Sunscreen SPF 30. This sunscreen product is a “drug” within 

the meaning of Sections 12 and 15 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

3. The acts and practices of Respondent alleged in this complaint have been in or 

affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission 

Act.

4. Respondent advertises Natural Sunscreen SPF 30 on the Internet. This product 

retails for $6.99.

5. Respondent has disseminated or has caused to be disseminated advertisements for 

Natural Sunscreen SPF 30, including but not necessarily limited to the attached Exhibit A. 

A. Beyond Coastal’s “Natural Sunscreen SPF 30” webpage states the product is a:

100% natural sunscreen

Exhibit A, Internet webpage www.beyondcoastal.com/category/naturalformulas/natural-sunscreen-spf-30 (September 2015).
2

Count I

False Claim

6. In connection with the advertising, labeling, promotion, offering for sale, or sale 

of Natural Sunscreen SPF 30, Respondent has represented, directly or indirectly, expressly or by 

implication, that the product is a “100% natural” sunscreen.

7. In fact, Sunscreen SPF 30 is not “100% natural” because it contains or contained 

the synthetic ingredients Dimethicone and Caprylyl Glycol. Therefore, the “100% natural” 

representation set forth in Paragraph 6 is false or misleading.

Violations of Sections 5(a) and 12

8. The acts and practices of Respondent as alleged in this complaint constitute unfair 

or deceptive acts or practices, and the making of false advertisements, in or affecting commerce 

in violation of Sections 5(a) and 12 of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

THEREFORE, the Federal Trade Commission this sixth day of July, 2016, has issued 

this Complaint against Respondent.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

SEAL:
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 49 ) IV-C-1 5 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:53 AM Sheet 49of 232P. 2 

# TZ-C-/S ' ;4i V _ c . co o

Honorabl e Lama r Smit h U.S . Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D C 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Smith : Than k yo u for passinqalon g the comment s o f Mr . W.D . Stell a an

d Texa s Stat e Representativ e Dudle yHarriso n concerning EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refueling emissio n controls . B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l be considere d a s we prepar e our Fina l Rule . W e wil l als o b e placing the

min the publi c docke t fo r th e Rul e (Docke t No . A-87-11 ) a s yo u requested . Than k yo u agai n fo r your concer n i n thi s matter .

Sincerel yyours , '•;. . ' r ; f? Y Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s fee: Docke t A-87-1 1 bcc : Regio n 0 6 Congressiona l Liaison/Dereme rP. 3

ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N JA N 2 5 19' - GENT3J V DOCKE T -. ' yW
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, S. Kent Rockwell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sensytech, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 12, 2004   /s/ S. Kent Rockwell    S. Kent Rockwell  Chief Executive Officer
#### Neil Clifford FLOWERS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40754.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 28, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 243 So.2d 187.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
M.0$-i3-0030Z.-CiL
...... isaa&zo &ambz, n\t the cw&ofcnxMrtinu 

### ArpzuLANT, flPPeALs roft th^%trte &? 

# $7'/lT£ or7£*AS, 0FCWM/NALAPP£ALS •APRGIL&. SEP 172Q15 

## Abel Acosta, Clerk

_.._/VW COMBSt MMLZO&AMeZ.n&5015*i
. NpeLLAiJT XVXftE tzLe /? sr.A/&,te copy aa/0 ^ho^ss thxs ccaupx&co& cftu%e to '



### GlktthjT TH%S MQTZQhJ AS FOLuOu/S', i). Tne APpet-uiAsr£3 eumzfisTLv XAenacezftrTBD xaj me T.QC*rt --CZD. 6OR^0CTrOh\jBL. ZA/$TXTlA'fXOU AMQ CMIU#j®T pgovxibg : &?Prfs gecnu&z /^pp^lla/ut Does, /jot nav& Access to a GoPxa/Gi , 

### A4i4t$4XA/&'trtA/Of 

### 2) thF RPpeu-AA/r'v 6owv%€<-ksfiscougr APPoxtjreto a/jo
c&u/zr. 

### juMeaBro^ pzeMzstts* CoN$rDm&b,APPeuuAMr ezAYs.+Hinr TUXS Cdu&T i,J£LL GfiA/sT TttCS WMXOM TOFXct? A SXA/ai& COP? Atso HAve rft&. cusm*- orrne csha&x to aa&kb eoi%^ ro &o Tojtier g0GuuxiLeD PttUVfBS*
x / AtoitXD &&rnez j*iQZcn s H, &&£*/£*. -cjjcfrncgfcftreo xas rne 

### TOCJX.-CZp,...ti.H.COfTfetO UfaXT ICAJ ftAJ&6RSQKt' cou/vtJ^teyn^no mCCftPZ THAT Tt4B f&k &GXaJG XS T'£UB ArJD CCmjieCT urvO&Z Ttic peAsncry or pePLjuoy. gxjscuTco^rtfxs £&oayo^sePreM&EP-,2015 

### HtseeCWuLLV ^uB.Mxrreb, 

## OQURTOFCnMMALAPPEMB ^^^^ **y>nW SEP 08 2015 COFTZGU) (JNjrr

t.c-pxce
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**906 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VeritasDGC Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”),I, Thierry Pilenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;

 

2.  The information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for theperiods presented as required by such Report.

 

June 1, 2005

 

 
| /s/ THIERRY PILENKO     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Thierry Pilenko         |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 10.2

                              Consent of Accountant


                               GEORGE STEWART, CPA
                     2301 SOUTH JACKSON STREET, SUITE 101-G
                           SEATTLE, WASHIINGTON 98144




To Whom It May Concern:

The  firm  of  George  Stewart,  Certified  Public  Accountant  consents  to the
inclusion of my report of June 13, 2001, on the  Financial  Statements of Medina
Coffee,  Inc. as of December 31, 2000 and May 31, 2001,  in any filings that are
necessary  now or in the  near  future  with the U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.

Very truly yours,

/s/George Stewart


June 21, 2001
#### Allen M. BUSCH, Appellant, v. Arlyne R. BUSCH, Appellee.

No. 77-379.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1978.

*692James Fox Miller of Miller & Schwartz, P. A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Jeffrey P. Wasserman and Merle Litman of Litman, Muchnick & Wasserman, Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

As part of a final judgment of dissolution the wife was granted the exclusive possession of the marital home until she died or remarried or until the youngest child in her custody reached 18 years of age. The husband was ordered to make the mortgage payments on the home and the court, in an amended final judgment, designated these payments as rehabilitative alimony. We find no error in awarding the wife alimony in the form of the mortgage payments. However, we believe the designation of the award as rehabilitative is not appropriate or supported by the record. We find no other error. Accordingly, the word “rehabilitative” is hereby stricken from the amended final judgment where it applies to the mortgage payments; and the amended final judgment is affirmed as modified.

DOWNEY, C. J., ANSTEAD, J., and SIL-VERTOOTH, LYNN N., Associate Judge, concur.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





(Date of report)July 16, 2014(Date of earliest event reported)July 15, 2014





ONEOK PARTNERS, L.P.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware1-1220293-1120873(State or other jurisdiction(Commission(IRS Employerof incorporation)File Number)Identification No.)





100 West Fifth Street; Tulsa, OK


(Address of principal executive offices)





74103


(Zip code)





(918) 588-7000


(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)





Not Applicable


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[] Written communication pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 7.01Regulation FD DisclosureOn July 15, 2014, ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK) and ONEOK Partners, L.P. (ONEOK Partners) announced they will release their second-quarter 2014 earnings after the market closes on August 5, 2014, and will hold a joint conference call and live webcast at 11 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time (10 a.m. Central Daylight Time) on August 6, 2014.  The call will also be carried live on the ONEOK and ONEOK Partners websites.  A copy of the news release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.The information disclosed in this Item 7.01, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto, is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.Item 9.01Financial Statements and Exhibits(d)ExhibitsExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated July 15, 2014.





2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.





ONEOK Partners, L.P.By:  ONEOK Partners GP, L.L.C.,General PartnerDate:July 16, 2014By:/s/ Derek S. ReinersDerek S. ReinersSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer





3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1News release issued by ONEOK, Inc. and ONEOK Partners, L.P. dated July 15, 2014.








4
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-23517, No. 333-154252, No. 333-23513 and No. 333-165729) on Form S-8 of The Female Health Company of our report dated December 3, 2010, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Female Health Company for the year ended September 30, 2010.








/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP





Chicago, Illinois


December 3, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,703,858
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,401
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               813,984
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,074,419
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 18,257,617
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         671,569
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           681,100
<LOANS>                                     82,500,065
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,342,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,149,393
<DEPOSITS>                                  81,852,068
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,805,927
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,409,381
<LONG-TERM>                                 11,038,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,526,923
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,516,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             120,149,393
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,083,993
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,053,242
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               253,797
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,391,032
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,074,566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,136,613
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,254,419
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  583,374
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              85,764
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,022,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,433,090
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,683,349
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,683,349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.29
<LOANS-NON>                                    529,531
<LOANS-PAST>                                   462,169
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   230
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,409,113
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  876,045
<RECOVERIES>                                   227,568
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,342,870
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,342,870
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>