alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ava Lee SINGLETON, Appellant, v. Thomas M. BOYLE and Ford Motor Company, a foreign corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-517.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 27, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Richard B. Keating, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Sauer-Danfoss Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sven Ruder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 3, 2011/s/ Sven RuderSven RuderPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

Assigned on Briefs March 2, 2005

IN RE M.J.M., JR., L.P.M., & C.A.O.M.

 Appeal from the Juvenile Court for White County

No. JU 1839 Sam Benningfield, Judge

No. M2004-02377-COA-R3-PT - Filed April 14, 2005

WILLIAM B. CAIN, J., concurring.

I continue to disagree with the standard of review employed by the Court in this case for

reasons discussed at length in In Re Z.J.S. No. 2002-02235-COA-R3-JV, 2003 WL 21266854 at *18-

22 (Tenn.Ct.App.June 3, 2003) (no Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 11 application filed) and

Estate of Acuff v. O’Linger, 56 S.W.3d 527, 533-37 (Tenn.Ct.App.2001). A preponderance of the

evidence standard is inconsistent and irreconcilable with a clear and convincing evidence standard

either in the trial court or on appeal.

I concur with the result in this case even under my view of the clear and convincing evidence

standard. This case presents a troubling example of what has appeared in a number of previous

cases. The Permanency Plan was ordered on May 30, 2003. The Petition to Terminate Parental

Rights was filed November 21, 2003. After the filing of the Petition to Terminate Parental Rights,

the Department paid scant attention to D.M. even though the Permanency Plan by its very terms

envisioned a completion date of May 22, 2004. The Court correctly holds that the unilateral decision

of the Department as to the timing of the filing of a Petition to Terminate Parental Rights does not

discharge the Department from continuing to help the parent to meet the goals of the Permanency

Plan. The “too-little, too-late” concept should not be determined as of the date of the filing of the

Petition to Terminate without regard to either the termination of the Permanency Plan or

developments that occur between the filing of the Petition to Terminate and the hearing on the merits

of the Petition.

Given the fact that D.M. suffers from a powerful addiction, it maywell be that she will never

be able to free herself from it, but the record discloses a determined effort on her part to try. It is

simply to early to say “too little, too late.”

I concur in the judgment.

___________________________________ 

WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
No. 10314.

#### Jones, Sheriff, et al. *v.*Goode.

Decided May 12, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Frank H. Freericks*and *Mr. Rufus B. Smith,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Maxwell & Ramsey; Messrs. Outcalt & Foraker; Mr. Joseph S. Graydon*and *Mr. Smith Hickenloopcr,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
Office of the Secretary

June 17, 2014

Kimberly Scott

Chief of Municipal Code Compliance

214 North Hogan Street, 1st Floor

Jacksonville, Florida 32202

Re: In the Matter of Ardagh Group, S.A./Saint-Gobain Containers, 

Inc./Compagnie de Saint-Gobain, FTC Docket No. 9356

Thank you for your comment regarding the proposed Consent Order accepted by 

the Federal Trade Commission for public comment in the above-captioned matter. The 

Commission has reviewed your comment in connection with its decision concerning 

whether to accord final approval to the proposed Consent Order. The Commission has 

placed your comment on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii). This letter responds to the

comment you submitted to the Commission on behalf of the City of Jacksonville. 

In your comment, you raise a concern about a history of air pollution violations 

committed during the time that Mr. Fredlake was CEO of Anchor Glass Container 

Corporation. These violations relate to furnace emission monitoring and cullet usage 

monitoring and were only revealed after Ardagh took ownership of Anchor Glass 

Container Corporation. You suggest that an individual other than Mr. Fredlake and more 

removed from this history be considered as Hold Separate Manager.

Mr. Fredlake, as Hold Separate Manager, is not the final authority on 

environmental compliance issues. Ardagh has taken remedial measures to address the 

non-compliance and the held-separate Anchor Glass Business continues to work towards 

compliance. Ardagh has informed the Hold Separate Monitor, who is responsible for 

supervising Mr. Fredlake’s management of the Anchor Glass Business, of the issue raised 

in the City of Jacksonville’s comment. The proposed buyer is also aware of the issue. 

Additionally, Mr. Fredlake is the intended CEO of the business. He has been 

chosen to lead the business because his experience will help establish the business as a 

viable, strong, glass container competitor.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580
2

After careful consideration of your comment and the entire evidentiary record, the 

Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served by issuing the 

Decision and Order as final without modification. A copy of the final Decision and 

Order is enclosed for your information. Relevant materials also are available from the 

Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov. 

It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work on 

antitrust and consumer protection issues, and we appreciate your interest in this matter.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Wright dissenting and 

Commissioner McSweeny not participating.

 Donald S. Clark

 Secretary

cc: Ms. Dana Brown

City of Jacksonville Environmental Quality Division

214 North Hogan Street, Fifth Floor

Jacksonville, Florida 32202
FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20580

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 

proceeding the appearance of

□ counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES)

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding,

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being filed.

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission

Room H-113

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Edward G. Timlin

 Edward.Timlin@shearman.com

Shearman & Sterling LLP

599 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Phone Number: 212-848-7149

Jason M. Swergold

 Jason.Swergold@shearman.com

Shearman & Sterling LLP

599 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Phone Number: 212-848-5414

Ardagh Group S.A., et al. 11/12/2013

Ardagh Group S.A.

c/o Shearman & Sterling LLP

599 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10022

Phone Number: 212-848-4000

D09356 (Wayne D. Collins )

11 12 2013
EXHIBIT 99(ii)

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003, hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officers certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or5 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                              HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                              /s/ TERRENCE S. MCGRATH
                              --------------------------------
                              Terrence S. McGrath
                              Chief Operating Officer
                              May 9, 2003

                                       20
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7557 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7557

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the coverage of 
        Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to Tribal Governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2020

  Mr. O'Halleran (for himself and Mr. Cook) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the coverage of 
        Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to Tribal Governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COVERAGE OF CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND PAYMENTS TO 
              TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS.

    Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) 
is amended by inserting ``(or, in the case of a Tribal Government, 
December 30, 2022)'' after ``December 30, 2020''.
                                 <all>
```
#### John BARNHILL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44858.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 27, 1974.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Order Granting Motion for Extension - 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case No. DA 20
- 0423

___________ STATE OF MONTANA

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. RICHARD EDWARD ADSIT, JR. ,

Defendant and Appell an

t . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) **ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION** 

**__________________________________________________________________**

On Appeal from the Montana Tenth Judi ci alDistrict Court, Cascade County, Cause No. DC
- 2 3
- 2018
- 0 7

__________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of the Appellant’s Motion for Extension and good cause appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Appellant’s Opening Brief shall be filed with the court on or before March 5 , 2021 . DATED this ____ day of ________________, 202 1 .

_________________________________ Montana Supreme Court 01/29/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0423Order Granting Motion for Extension - 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cc: Meghan Lulf Sutton, Attorney for Appellant

Montana Attorney General Office, Tammy Plubell Heather Perry, Judith Basin County Attorney Ten th Judicial District Court , Judith Basin County Hon. Jon A. Oldenburg

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 29 2021
# Presidential Determination Pursuant to Section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of the Treasury[, and] the Secretary of Energy

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, after carefully considering the reports submitted to the Congress by the Energy Information Administration, including the report submitted in April 2018, and other relevant factors such as global economic conditions, increased oil production by certain countries, the global level of spare petroleum production capacity, and the availability of strategic reserves, I determine, pursuant to section 1245(d)(4)(B) and (C) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, Public Law 112-81, and consistent with prior determinations, that there is a sufficient supply of petroleum and petroleum products from countries other than Iran to permit a significant reduction in the volume of petroleum and petroleum products purchased from Iran by or through foreign financial institutions.

I will continue to monitor this situation closely.

                        The Secretary of State is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2018-12332

Billing code 4710-10-P
#### Buell C. ROLLINS, Appellant, v. F. Marvin ROSE, Jr., Appellee.

No. 71-923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George Richardson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF O'CHARLEY'S INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN O'CHARLEY'S INC'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           1,616
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                        58
<INVENTORY>                                      4,505
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,455
<PP&E>                                         129,797
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 117,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,319
<BONDS>                                         44,928
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,592
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   117,159
<SALES>                                        164,499
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,530
<CGS>                                          135,071
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,071
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (797)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,147)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.14)


</TABLE>
FTC’s Proposed Partial Stipulated Order for 

Permanent Injunction and Monetary Judgment

Attachment 3B

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-11 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 2
State Region

Alabama SE

Alaska Pacific NW

Arizona Desert SW

Arkansas SW

California California

Colorado Mountain

Connecticut Eastern

Delaware Eastern

District of Columbia Eastern

Florida SE

Georgia SE

Hawaii California

Idaho Pacific NW

Illinois Central

Indiana Central

Iowa Midwest

Kansas Midwest

Kentucky Central

Louisiana SW

Maine New England

Maryland Eastern

Massachusetts New England

Michigan Central

Minnesota Midwest

Mississippi SE

Missouri Central

Montana Mountain

Nebraska Midwest

Nevada Desert SW

New Hampshire New England

New Jersey Eastern

New Mexico Mountain

New York Eastern

North Carolina SE

North Dakota Midwest

Ohio Central

Oklahoma SW

Oregon Pacific NW

Pennsylvania Eastern

Rhode Island New England

South Carolina SE

South Dakota Midwest

Tennessee SE

Texas SW

Utah Pacific NW

Vermont New England

Virginia Eastern

Washington Pacific NW

West Virginia Eastern

Wisconsin Central

Wyoming Mountain

Puerto Rico Eastern

Attachment 3B: NADA Region List

Case 3:15-md-02672-CRB Document 1607-11 Filed 06/28/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Farmer Bros. Co. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Peter B. Knepper, Chief Financial Officer (Interim) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 9, 2010



/s/ Peter B. KnepperPeter B. KnepperChief Financial Officer (Interim)(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         6,983
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         11,892
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         133,831
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           136,175
<LOANS>                                        263,989
<ALLOWANCE>                                    4,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 433,745
<DEPOSITS>                                     343,947
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3,962
<LONG-TERM>                                    60,667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 25,169
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                23,011
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              6,601
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,414
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               31,026
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             15,169
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,275
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          13,751
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  2,262
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             632
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                8,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,532
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     6,532
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  5.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  5.90
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.69
<LOANS-NON>                                    636
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3,009
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  937
<RECOVERIES>                                   315
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              4,649
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           4,649
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of the Secretary 

November 10, 2014 

Hugh Prifogle 

State of Texas 

Re: In the Matter of Made in the USA Brand, LLC 

 File No. 142 3121, Docket No. C-4497 

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent 

agreement in the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment 

and placed it on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii). 

In your comment, you request that the Commission punish companies that have used 

Respondent’s certification mark. You do not propose any revisions to the draft complaint or the 

consent agreement. 

During its investigation into this matter, the Federal Trade Commission worked with 

several companies that used Respondent’s mark to remediate potentially deceptive U.S.-origin 

claims and bring them into compliance with the law. Going forward, the FTC expects that the 

requirements set forth in the consent agreement will prevent Respondent’s clients from making 

deceptive claims. 

Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission has determined that the 

relief set forth in the consent agreement is appropriate and sufficient to remedy the violations 

alleged in the complaint. At this time, the Commission has determined that the public interest 

would best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without modification. The 

final Decision and Order and other relevant materials are available on the Commission’s website 

at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its 

work, and we thank you again for your comment. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Donald S. Clark 

Secretary
#### DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD et al., Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY CLASSROOM TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 44131.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 13, 1973.

Cause dismissed.