alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-31027

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SANTOS CANDELO-MOSQUERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:04-CR-60041-ALL

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos

Candelo-Mosquera (Candelo) has moved for leave to withdraw and

has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Candelo has not filed a response to

counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
No. 05-31027

-2-

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>   
<MULTIPLIER>   1

       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                        53,200
<SECURITIES>                                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                223,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             347,400
<PP&E>                                                       929,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                               469,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             1,064,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        341,700
<BONDS>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                   7,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               1,064,600
<SALES>                                                    1,657,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           1,657,000
<CGS>                                                      1,322,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              1,736,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            36,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (127,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (126,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (126,300)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        


</TABLE>
No. 10872.

#### Carnegie Steel Co. *v.*Rowan.

Decided April 29, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Belmont county.

*Mr. J. C. Tallman*and *Mr. Fred Spriggs,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Paul Jones; Mr. Charles J. Lynch*and *Mr. J. B. JJandlan,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthis Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A of THQ Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward K. Zinser, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,that:
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
|        | /s/ Edward K. Zinser                                                                 |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Edward K. Zinser  Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer  May 30, 2007 |   |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40


### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
STANDARD METHODS 

FOR THE 

EXAMINATION OF WATER AND WASTEWATER 

Joint Editorial Board 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Jennifer Best FROM: Eugene W. Rice 

 Office of Ground Water & Drinking Water Office of Research & Development 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

 26 W. M.L. King Dr. 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr. 

 Cincinnati, OH 45268 Cincinnati, OH 45268 

 

 

 

RE: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water DATE: July 13, 2009 

and Wastewater, Sections 9221D,F and 9222G 

Your inquiry regarding the formulation for the bacteriological medium EC-MUG has been reviewed by 

the Part Coordinator for Part 9000 (Dr. Margo Hunt). A review of previous editions of Standard 

Methods showed a discrepancy in the formulation regarding the concentrations of potassium 

dihydrogen phosphate and 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG) in section 9221F and 9222G. 

This discrepancy has been addressed in the latest versions and the correct amounts (1.5 grams 

potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 0.05 grams 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide) are now 

listed in these sections (9221F, on-line version, 2006; 9222G in process of being placed on-line, 

2009). 

Your question regarding the use of Presence-Absence broth (section 9221D) in a multiple tube format 

is not specifically addressed in the section. The directions provided for the use of this medium 

assume the analysis of a whole one hundred milliliter sample volume, thus a triple (3X) strength 

formulation is provided. Presence-Absence broth has been used in the multiple tube format, however 

the strength of the broth would have to be determined based upon the volume of the sample to be 

analyzed (see Table 9221:1 for specific guidance).

APHA, 800 I Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001 • (202) 777-2742 

AWWA, 6666 W. Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235 • (303) 794-7711 

WEF, 601 Wythe Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-1994 • (703) 684-2400
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 4, 2018














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of November 30, 2018 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$15,200Sub-advised funds1,524Institutional accounts4,716Total$21,440





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,311Small-Mid Cap3,221Mid Cap153Large Cap10,879All Cap Select484Long-Short4,126Global/International19Short Duration Fixed Income530Core Fixed Income55Long Duration Fixed Income50Corporate Credit783High Yield53(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(224)Total$21,440








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:December 4, 2018By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
No. 10665.

#### The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. *v.*Stober, Admr.

Decided June 9, 1908.

Error to Circuit-Court of AVarren county.

*Mr. John E. Smith; Mr. Ben B. Nelson*and *Mr. Leonard J. Hackney,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Patrick Gaynor*and *Mr. S. O. Bay-less,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           6,329
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,322
<INVENTORY>                                     67,967
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,466
<PP&E>                                         209,799
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 582,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,409
<BONDS>                                        188,427
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           16,691
<PREFERRED>                                    254,215
<COMMON>                                           140
<OTHER-SE>                                   (124,555)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   582,762
<SALES>                                        175,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,547
<CGS>                                          138,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,717
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,626)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   7,290
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (107)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



BancWest Corporation and Subsidiaries 
EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K(Continued) Exhibit 31 Certifications I, Walter A. Dods, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of BancWest Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. /s/ Walter A. Dods, Jr.Name: Walter A. Dods, Jr.Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 Date: May 13, 2004
#### Eddie FULLER, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-945.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 19, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-165151 on Form S-8 of Colonial Properties Trust of our report dated June 15, 2011 , relating to the financial statements and supplemental schedule of the Colonial Properties Trust Amended and Restated 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of Colonial Properties Trust Amended and Restated 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for the year ended December 31, 2010 .








/s/ Sellers, Richardson, Holman & West, LLP





Birmingham, Alabama





June 15, 2011
#### Harry E. BRAY et al., Appellants, v. H. B. ROMIG et al., Appellees.

No. 72-760.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 20, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Stewart, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Professional Health Imaging, P.C., as Assignee of Herminio Veras, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Irena Golodkeyer, Esq.), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff, Esq.), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered September 5, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike defendant's answer and to compel defendant to respond to discovery demands.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike defendant's answer and to compel defendant to respond to discovery demands. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court granting defendant's motion and denying plaintiff's cross motion.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <a href="../2016/2016_50698.htm" target="_blank"><i>Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.</i> (51 Misc 3d 143</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50698[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016]), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: November 03, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
### REISSUED FOR PUBLICATION SEP 27 2016 OSM U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                     33,000
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             273,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                               17,600
<INVENTORY>                                               385,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          757,200
<PP&E>                                                    525,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                            200,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          1,419,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     639,600
<BONDS>                                                   206,900
<COMMON>                                                  175,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                               128,100
<OTHER-SE>                                                  6,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            1,419,700
<SALES>                                                   485,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          485,600
<CGS>                                                     373,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              78,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            1,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          9,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            22,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                                8,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        13,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               13,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 .32

        

</TABLE>
#### Ronald Collier GASKINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-596.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Aug. 13, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Walter Charles PARLANGE, Jr., et al. v. CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., Noble Drilling Corporation, et al.

No. 62720.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 26, 1978.

In re: Chevron USA Inc. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus to stay and review a pre-trial discovery order. Parish of Pointe Coupee.

Writ denied.

MARCUS, J.,

is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.