alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          17,318
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  292,242
<ALLOWANCES>                                    24,251
<INVENTORY>                                    183,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               506,638
<PP&E>                                       1,263,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                 701,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,365,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,277
<OTHER-SE>                                     932,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,365,759
<SALES>                                         63,276
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               259,729
<CGS>                                           41,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Percy FISHER.

No. 61206.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Percy Fisher, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Natchitoches.

Writ denied.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-91,442-01

EX P ARTE MARTIN HERNAND EZ G ARCIA, A ppl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR45195A IN THE 385 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM MID LAND COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applican t was convicted of possession of a prohibited substance or item in a corr ectional fac ility and sentenc ed to 3 y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends th at h e wa s denied adequa te notice from the Boa

rd of Pardons and Paroles that he would be considere d for rele ase on discretionar y mandatory supervision. See T E X . G O V ’ T C O D E §§ 508.147, 508. 1 49. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Ex parte Retzlaff

, 135 S.W .3d 45 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Acc ording ly , the re cord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C .2

art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order the Boa rd o f P ar dons and Paroles’s Offic e of the Gene ral Counsel to obtain a response from a person with knowledg e of rele vant fac ts. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indigen t

. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repres en t him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court s h al l make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw as to whether Applicant was provide d adequa

te notice f rom the B oard of

Pardons and Par oles that he would be considere d for rele ase on discretionar y mandatory supervision. The trial court may make any other finding s and conclusions that it deems appr opriate in re sponse to Applicant’s c laims. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions o f law withi n ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motio n s, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: September 16, 2020 Do not publish
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William W. Boyle,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
| /s/ W. W. Boyle                                    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| W. W. Boyle                                        |
| Senior Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| Date: August 2, 2006                               |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4805]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-248-000]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 14, 1997, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern), 1111 South 103rd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68124-1000, filed 
in Docket No. CP97-248-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 
CFR 157.205, 157.212) for authorization to install and operate a new 
delivery tap in Fillmore County, Minnesota, under Northern's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-401-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Northern proposes to install and operate the proposed delivery tap, 
consisting of a hot tap and valve, to accommodate natural gas 
deliveries to UtiliCorp United Inc. (UCU) for redelivery to Forest 
Resource Center. Northern states that UCU will install, own, and 
operate all facilities located downstream of Northern's tap. UCU, 
Northern states, has requested the new delivery tap to provide service 
to FRC's nature camp located near Lanesboro, Minnesota. The estimated 
volumes delivered to UCU at the FRC delivery tap will be 600 MMBtu peak 
day and 5,600 MMBtu annually. The estimated cost for delivery tap 
installation is $15,000 and UCU will reimburse Northern the 
installation costs.
    Northern states that the proposed delivery tap is not prohibited by 
its existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish 
deliveries without detriment or disadvantage to its other customers. 
The proposed delivery tap will not have an effect on Northern's peak 
day and annual deliveries and the total volumes delivered will not 
exceed total volumes authorized prior to this request.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4805 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350 AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Form 10-K of Environmental Solutions
Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the
"Report"), Mark Yung, Executive Chairman of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                DATE: MARCH 31, 2011

                                                /S/ MARK YUNG
                                                ----------------------------
                                                MARK YUNG
                                                EXECUTIVE CHAIRMAN


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Environmental Solutions Worldwide,
Inc. and will be retained by Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.01

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Ashley Capital Management, Inc. as General Partner of Atlas Futures Fund, LP,
certify that (i) the Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006 of Atlas Futures Fund, LP fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Atlas Futures Fund, LP.


ATLAS FUTURES FUND, LP
By:  Ashley Capital Management, Inc., General Partner



By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
Michael Pacult
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer


Date:	July 3, 2007


<page>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: December 18, 2014

TO: Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants ; Docket Id: OAR-2013-0495 FROM: Mark de Figueiredo, EPA SUBJECT: December 18, 2014 Meeting Regarding Propos ed Carbon Pollution Standard for

New Power Plants

**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and Natural Resource s Defense Council (NRDC) staff on December 18, 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Po llution Standard for New Power Plants as related to geologic sequestration.

**ATTENDEES Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)**  George Peridas NRDC

David Hawkins NRDC

**US EPA** Mark de Figueiredo OAP, EPA Anhar Karimjee OAP, EPA Nick Hutson OAQPS, EPA
#### John POLITIS, Appellant, v. Lewis SHAFFER et al., Appellees.

No. 72-196.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 15, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
From: Yanca, Catherine

To: Yanca, Catherine

Subject: EPA response to ethanol health effects: EPA Tier 3 - EO 12866 Comments

Date: Friday, May 17, 2013 1:14:38 PM

From: Sargeant, Kathryn 

Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 11:47 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Cc: Charmley, William; Grundler, Christopher; Cook, Rich; Hoyer, Marion; Brunner, Christine

Subject: EPA response to ethanol health effects: EPA Tier 3 - EO 12866 Comments

Attached please find our response to comment number 8 on ethanol health effects.  The text in

question is included for convenience.

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, March 22, 2013 10:00 AM

To: Sargeant, Kathryn

Subject: EPA Tier 3 - EO 12866 Comments

Karthyn,

   Attached are EO 12866 comments on the Tier 3 proposed rule.

Regards,

Chad
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED BY


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended April 2, 2011 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Brian J. Farrell, Chief Executive Officer and Paul J. Pucino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Brian J. FarrellBrian J. FarrellChief Executive OfficerJune 6, 2011/s/ Paul J. PucinoPaul J. PucinoChief Financial OfficerJune 6, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
<PAGE>

                EXHIBIT 23 - INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT
                                          
                                          
                                          
The Board of Directors
Cubic Corporation


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic
Corporation as of June 30, 1998, and the related consolidated condensed
statement of income for the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 1998 and
1997, and the consolidated condensed statement of cash flows for the nine-month
periods ended June 30, 1998 and 1997.  These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September
30, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings,
and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report
dated December 4, 1997, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet at September 30, 1997, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.

                                                  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
August 6, 1998
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-96981 of BJ Services Company on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-36754,33-52506, 33-62098, 33-58637, 333-88151, 333-88773, 333-61294 and 333-73348 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8 of our report dated December 12, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to achange of method of accounting for goodwill in 2002) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BJ Services Company for the year ended September 30, 2003. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

December 12, 2003
<TABLE>
                                             EXHIBIT 11

                               Falcon Products, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                               --------------------------------------

                                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                            (Unaudited)
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Thirteen Weeks Ended
                                                              -----------------------------------
                                                              February 1,             January 27,
Primary Earnings Per Share:                                      1997                    1996
---------------------------                                   -----------             -----------
<S>                                                           <C>                     <C>
Average number of common shares outstanding                    9,745,602               9,522,661

Assumed exercise of options (treasury stock method)              197,540                 277,375
                                                              ----------              ----------

Shares for primary computation                                 9,943,142               9,800,036
                                                              ==========              ==========

Net earnings                                                  $1,866,065              $1,622,994
                                                              ==========              ==========

Net earnings per share                                             $ .19                   $ .17
                                                                   =====                   =====


Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:
---------------------------------

Average number of common shares outstanding                    9,751,808               9,522,661

Assumed exercise of options (treasury stock method)              205,959                 281,323
                                                              ----------              ----------

Shares for fully diluted computation                           9,957,767               9,803,984
                                                              ==========              ==========

Net earnings                                                  $1,866,065              $1,622,994
                                                              ==========              ==========

Net earnings per share                                             $ .19                   $ .17
                                                                   =====                   =====
</TABLE>

                                    10
1

APPENDIX I

(PLACEHOLDER FOR FUTURE NOTICES)

60-DAY FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE

30-DAY FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10- QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cynthia A. Hayden, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |                         | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | Dated: October 20, 2008 | 
| | /s/ Cynthia A. Hayden   | 
| | Cynthia A. Hayden       | 
| | President               | 
| |                         |
#### Colian GNANN, Jr., Petitioner, v. PAUL D. JETT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondents.

No. 44636.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 26, 1974.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.