alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11.1

                             EAGLE BANCORP, INC.

                   Computation of Earnings per Common Share
                                 (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                         Years
                                                       ended December 31,
                                                 1996         1995           1994
                                               --------     --------      -------

<S>                                          <C>           <C>           <C>
       Primary

Net Income                                     $ 501,856    $ 500,180     $ 428,671

Shares:
  Weighted average number of common shares
    outstanding                                  862,845      862,755       861,382
  Shares issuable from assumed exercise of
    options and warrants                          22,261       17,146        12,855
                                               ----------   ---------     ---------
      Weighted average number of common shares
      and common share equivalents outstanding   885,106      879,901       874,237
                                               =========    =========     =========

Net income per common share and common share
  equivalent                                   $     .57    $     .57     $     .49
                                               =========    =========     =========


      Fully Diluted

Net Income:                                    $ 501,856    $ 500,180     $ 428,671

Shares:
  Weighted average number of common shares
   and common share equivalent outstanding
   as adjusted per primary computation           885,106      879,901       874,237
  Additional shares issuable from assumed
   exercise of option and warrants computed
   on a fully diluted basis                           92        3,431         1,851
                                               ----------   ----------    ----------
      Weighted average number of common shares
      and common share equivalents outstanding    885,198     883,332       876,088
                                               ==========   ==========    ==========

      Net income per common share and common
        share equivalent                       $     .57    $     .57     $     .49
                                               ==========   ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6379

In Re: CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR., Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 5:02-cr-00235-BO) Submitted: June 22, 2007 Decided: July 12, 2007 Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* To the extent Tucker complains of delay in a recently filed habeas petition, we find there has been no undue delay. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Cornelius Tucker, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order modifying a 2005 district court order finding him not guilty only by reason of insanity and delaying the hearing required in 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 4243(c), 4247(d) (West 2000 & Supp. 2007), until his release from state custody. This court has affirmed the district court’s decision to delay this hearing pending Tucker’s release from state court custody, United States v. Tucker , 153 F. App’x 173 (4th Cir. November 3, 2005) (No. 05-4336), and we conclude that Tucker is not entitled to mandamus relief. * Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 (File 333-09267), Form S-8 (File No. 33-54708), Form S-3
(File No. 333-12883), Form S-3 (File No. 333-6991), Form S-3 (File No. 33-78982)
and Form S-3 (File No. 333-34021) of Envirogen, Inc. of our report dated
February 17, 1999 relating to of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule as of December 31, 1998 and the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Florham Park, New Jersey
March 28, 2000

                                      68
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the amended and restated Quarterly Report of Hydron
Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 5,
2007, hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                               /s/: David Pollock
                               ------------------
                                  David Pollock
       Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                  June 5, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                                 
<ARTICLE>               5
<LEGEND>                                                        
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS,  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  STATEMENT OF
STOCKHOLDERS'  DEFICIENCY  AND  STATEMENT  OF CASH  FLOWS  FROM FORM 10Q FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 26, 1998
</LEGEND>                                                       
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000
                                                                       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                            1,834
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    82,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4,497
<INVENTORY>                                      52,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                140,657
<PP&E>                                           25,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                   15,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  265,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           107,383
<BONDS>                                         155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (4,146)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    265,776
<SALES>                                         844,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                850,112
<CGS>                                           763,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   835,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  7,665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    825
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               13,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7,985
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3,849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (201)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3,935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        
 

</TABLE>
#### UNIVERSITY SHOPPING CENTER, INCORPORATED, a corporation, Appellant, v. A. E. ANDERSON, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. N-557.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 1971.

William H. Maness, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Sears, Dunlap & Sears, Jacksonville, for appellees.

SPECTOR, Chief Judge.

Appellant seeks review of a final judgment dismissing its complaint requesting a declaratory judgment and supplemental relief. Appellant’s concern is a lease of realty. By assignment, appellant has assumed the benefits and duties accruing to the first tenants who executed the lease. Because the landlord, the appellees, by warranty deed has conveyed the leased premises to a third party, appellant questions the validity of the ground lease and its several rights thereunder and asks for judicial interpretation thereof.

Appellant’s request falls squarely within the provisions of Chapter 86, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. A reading of those sections clearly indicates that the complaint below should have been heard, particularly Section 86.021. As revealed by the complaint, there is doubt on the part of appellant regarding the length of time within which an option to purchase the leased premises may be exercised; the tenant’s obligations upon ceasing to honor the terms of the lease; and whether a mutual mistake as to useable acreage requires a reduction in the rental or cancellation of the lease agreement. An analogous situation is presented in Bal Harbour Towers, Inc. v. Keller, 227 So.2d 219 (Fla.App.1969).

Accordingly, the final judgment appealed is reversed, and this cause remanded with directions to consider appellant’s complaint pursuant to Chapter 86, Florida Statutes, F.S.A.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

CARROLL, DONALD, K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Enzo J.
Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Enzo J. Vialardi
--------------------
Enzo J. Vialardi
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         426,780
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,767,211
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               212,015
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    291,322
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         760,428
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           761,964
<LOANS>                                      5,566,793
<ALLOWANCE>                                    124,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,595,743
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,647,690
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             98,225
<LONG-TERM>                                    132,679<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,675
<OTHER-SE>                                     548,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,595,743
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                367,780
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               34,516
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 6,797
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               409,093
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             150,488
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             159,675
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          249,418
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   77,629
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                231,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,540
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      49,544
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   147.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   147.89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F2>
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,382
<LOANS-PAST>                                    71,512
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0<F2>
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               128,990
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  101,416
<RECOVERIES>                                    16,316
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              124,300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0<F2>
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 93,458 IN CAPITAL NOTES 
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR INTERIM REPORTING PURPOSES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4057]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

The Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995: Covered Officials

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is adding to its list 
of ``covered officials'', for purposes of the Lobbying Disclosure Act 
of 1995, the NRC's Chief Information Officer.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    In late 1995, President Clinton signed into law the Lobbying 
Disclosure Act of 1995 (the ``Act''), which requires some individuals 
and entities who lobby ``covered'' Federal officials to register with 
Congress and to file semiannual reports describing their lobbying 
activities.
    For purposes of the Act, the NRC had determined that ``covered'' 
officials at the NRC were limited to Members of the Commission and 
their personal staffs, the Inspector General, the Executive Director 
for Operations, the General Counsel, and the Directors of the Offices 
of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards 
and Nuclear Regulatory Research. See Federal Register of February 1, 
1996 (61 FR 3737).
    As a result of the enactment of the Information Technology 
Management Reform Act of 1996, the position of Chief Information 
Officer (CIO) was created for 22 named executive-branch agencies, 
including the NRC. The NRC has determined that the NRC's CIO is a 
``covered'' official for purposes of the Act. Therefore, the NRC is 
adding the NRC's CIO to its list of ``covered officials''.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Urban, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555-
0001, telephone (301) 415-1619.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of February, 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John C. Hoyle,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-4057 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
| **Concurring Statement of Commissioner Mary    L. Azcuenaga**in Stone Container Corp., Docket No. C-3806

I concur in the decision to issue the consent order but decline to join the separate    statement of Chairman Pitofsky and Commissioners Anthony and Thompson. The consent    agreement, which includes the consent order and the complaint on which it is based,    constitutes the decisional document of the Commission. My substantive views on this matter    are contained entirely within the four corners of the decisional document. See Dissenting    Statement of Commissioner Mary L. Azcuenaga in Dell Computer Corp., at 21-23 (Docket No.    3658, May 20, 1996). |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 10782.

#### The Union Central Life Insurance Co. *v.*Hynicka, Treasurer.

Decided May 26, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, Jr.; Mr. Robert Ramsey*and *Mr. William W. Ramsey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Ireion, Collins, Schoenle & Poor; Mr. Frank Dinsmore*and *Mr. Alfred B. Benedict,*for defendant in error.

Former judg*433ment adhered to.

Price, C. J., Shaucic, Crew, Summers and Spear JJ., concur.
From: Ed Kalakauskis [ mailto:uskalkis@aol.com ]

Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 9:49 AM

To: Derby, Jennifer Subject: final environmental impact statement

Ms. Jennifer,

I would first like to thank you for the opportunity to address the proposed ocean, dredging material disposal sites(ODM DS). As a volunteer artificial reef builder for the community of Jacksonville for the last 30 some years I have spent countless hours ob serving the material that we have placed offshore Jacksonville. And this is my concerns.

First of all and most important of all is the overall underwater environment. With saying that I am concerned about the material that may move on the bottom that may impact our fisheries and habitat . For example invertebrates, shrimp and other marine life. Second is the nature of the material having the possibility of moving around and possibly impacting
areas that is not intended.

Once again, I'd like to thank you f or the opportunity and if I can be any further assistance please do not
hesitate to contact me.

"I got your 6" 

### Artificial reef builder(Jacksonville offshore sports fishing club)

Ed Kalakauskis 1207 Aruba Court, Jacksonville, FL 32226
area. 904

- 923

- 5994
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-398-CV

SAMUEL MUGENYI KADYEBO	APPELLANT	

	V.

THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On December 4, 2008, we notified appellant, in accordance with rules of appellate procedure 37.3.(b) and 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid and appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for preparation of the appellate record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3.(b), 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee or made arrangements to pay for the record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b), 42.3(c).  Instead, he filed “Appellant’s  Second Motion To Challenge Order Sustaining A Contest To Affidavit Of Indigence Alternatively Styled Appellant’s Motion To Rehear Challenge To Order Sustaining A Contest To Affidavit Of Indigence.”  

	We deny appellant’s motion.  Accordingly, because appellant has failed to comply with requirements of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.  

DELIVERED:  December 18, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ID-957-1430-00]


Idaho: Filing of Plats of Survey; Idaho

    The plat of the following described land was officially filed in 
the Idaho State Office, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, Idaho, 
effective 9:00 a.m. February 11, 1997.
    The plat representing the dependent resurvey of portions of the 
subdivisional lines and the subdivision of sections 15 and 22, T. 12 
S., R. 25 E., Boise Meridian, Idaho, Group No. 964, was accepted 
February 11, 1997.
    This plat was prepared to meet certain administrative needs of the 
Bureau of Land Management. All inquiries concerning the survey of the 
above described land must be sent to the Chief, Cadastral Survey, Idaho 
State Office, Bureau of Land Management, 1387 S. Vinnell Way, Boise, 
Idaho, 83709-1657.

    Dated: February 11, 1997.
Duane E. Olsen,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Idaho.
[FR Doc. 97-4978 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-M
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


 In connection with the Annual Report of Reinhold Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Michael T. Furry, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Brett R. Meinsen, Vice President - Finance and Administration of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ MICHAEL T. FURRY
Michael T. Furry
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003



/s/ BRETT R. MEINSEN
Brett R. Meinsen
Vice President - Finance and Administration
March 28, 2003
258 La. 360

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Frank C. WILLIAMS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51306.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Frank C. Williams applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. Relator pleaded to and was sentenced on two charges on the same date with counsel and relator present in court.