alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
^
                                  Diamond Hill
                                  ------------
                             Investment Group, Inc.


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
                                             Investor Contact:
                                             James F. Laird
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             614-255-3353
                                             E-mail: (jlaird@diamond-hill.com)

                      DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.
        ANNOUNCES UNAUDITED RESULTS FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003

     Columbus,  Ohio --November 17, 2003,  -- Diamond Hill  Investment  Group,
Inc. (NASDAQ:DHIL) today reported unaudited results for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003.  Assets under management increased by 126% to $198 million
compared to September 30, 2002 and investment management fees increased by 77%
compared to the third quarter of 2002.  The net operating loss for the quarter
was $323,000 a 52% improvement compared to a loss of $673,000 in the third
quarter of 2002.

     Ric Dillon, president and chief investment officer stated, "We have
continued to produce excellent investment returns for our clients, which is
our primary objective.  In addition, our efforts to market our investment
services have resulted in $75 million in new investments in our managed
accounts and mutual funds through the first nine months of the year.  Our
growth has continued into the 4th quarter, as we ended October with $215
million in assets under management, a $17 million increase compared to the end
of September.  We will maintain our focus on serving our clients' investment
needs, and we expect to have continued success in growing our business in the
future."  Separately, the DHIL board of directors re-affirmed the stock
buyback program under which up to 400,000 shares of stock are to be purchased
for treasury, approximately 50,000 shares remain to be purchased under the
program.

About Diamond Hill:

     Diamond Hill provides investment management services to individuals and
institutions seeking to preserve and build wealth.  The firm currently manages
mutual funds, seperate accounts and a private investment fund.  For more
information on Diamond Hill, visit www.diamond-hill.com.



                                     ###

            375 North Front Street, Suite 300, Columbus, Ohio 43215
                         614-255-3333  fax 614-255-3363
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          470642
<SECURITIES>                                    501073
<RECEIVABLES>                                   394535
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     393214
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1966116
<PP&E>                                         2086793
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1048385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3407221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           974320
<BONDS>                                           5535
<COMMON>                                        188371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2028250
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3407221
<SALES>                                          52394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2324831
<CGS>                                            34592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    34592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2399314
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (192584)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (201635)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (201635)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Stanley GILBERT.

No. 60227.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Harry F. Connick, apply*891ing for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ granted. The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Frank A. Marullo, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 12th day of October, 1977, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
August 27 , 2015

Manager, Flight Standards Service Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office FAA Headquarters, Building 10A 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

Re: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 11253 to Regulatory Do cket No FAA

- 2014

- 0817

for Drone Fleet & Aerospace Management (DFAM) for additional aircraft.

Attention: FAA UAS Integration Office

DFAM respectfully requests the addition of the following aircraft to our Exemption No.

11253 and COA FAA

- 2014

- 0817

- 333E:

Additional Aircraft Requested:

Allied Drones Chaos X

− 8
Note Maybe Eligible for Summary Grant/Amendment by previous FAA Analysis of Exemption No.

11440 ( Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0168 )

11393 ( Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 1097 )

DFAM’s existing safety standards and procedures as outlined in our Flight Ope ration & Procedures Manual (FOPM) will continue for the additional Aircraft. We will follow the recommended Maintenance and Operations Parameters set forth by each of these respective UAV Manufactures.

Please do not hesitate to contact me at the phone nu mber or via the e

- mail address provided above should you have any questions or concerns.

Respectfully submitted,

Simon Nielsen

CEO

, Drone Fleet & Aerospace Management , Inc. Simon Nielsen

CEO Drone Fleet & Aerospace Management, Inc. 606 Venice Blvd, Suite E Venice, CA 90291 (213) 379

- 0629 Simon.Nielsen@drone

- fleet.com

www.drone

- fleet.com
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02
- 12
- 00079
- CR

RUBEN VASQUEZ APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Ruben Vasquez pled guilty to state

jail

- felony theft , judicially confessed to that offense, and waived constitutional and statutory rights

. 2 The trial court convicted him and follow ed the State’s punishment recommendation by sente nc ing him to six months’ confinement. Appellant filed a notice of appeal, but the trial court certified that this “is a plea

-

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 See Tex. Penal Cod e Ann. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2011).2

bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) (explaining that in a plea bargain case, defendants may appeal only after getting the trial court’s permission or when the appeal concerns matters raised by written pretrial motions that are ruled on before trial) , (d) ( stating that the “appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record”)

. W e sent a letter to appellant to express that because of the trial court’s certification, unless he filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, we could dismiss it. Appellant has not filed a response. Thu s, in
accordance with the trial court’s certification and because appellant has not established that rule 25.2(a)(2) permits this appeal , we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2 (a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

TERRIE LIVINGSTON CHIEF JUSTICE
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )
DELIVERED: May 31, 2012
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

August 11, 2014

Amanda Wait, Esq.

Hunton & Williams LLP

2200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, D.C. 20037

Re: In the Matter of Service Corporation International and Stewart Enterprises, Inc., 

Docket No. C-4423

Dear Ms. Wait:

This is in reference to the Petition for Approval of Proposed Divestiture filed by Service 

Corporation International (“SCI”) and received on May 29, 2014 (“Petition”). Pursuant to the 

Decision and Order in Docket No. C-4423, SCI requests prior Commission approval of its 

proposal to divest certain assets to Legacy Funeral Holdings, Inc. (“Legacy”).

After consideration of SCI’s Petition and other available information, the Commission 

has determined to approve the proposed divestiture as set forth in the Petition. In according its 

approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and the representations 

made by SCI and Legacy in connection with SCI’s Petition and has assumed them to be accurate 

and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Paul Houston
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Neil Joseph BUSSO, Appellee.

No. P-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 10, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.0

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is given by the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cascade
Bancorp (the registrant) pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, with respect to the registrants
annual report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that:

|1. |  | The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
  Company.

|/s/ Patricia L. Moss                        | 
|------------------------------------------- | 
|Patricia L.
      Moss                     
|President and
      Chief Executive Officer
|                                           
|                                           
|                                           
|/s/ Gregory D. Newton                       | 
|Gregory D.
      Newton                    
|Executive Vice
      President and         
|Chief Financial
      Officer              
|                                           
|                                           
|Dated:                                      | 

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, R. James Kelly, ViceChairman and Chief Financial Officer of Family Dollar Stores, Inc., (the “Company”),do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

•                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended February 25,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  March 31,2006

 

 
| /s/ R. James Kelly |                                       |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|               | R. James Kelly                             |
|               | Vice Chairman and Chief  Financial Officer |
|               | (Principal Financial  Officer)             |
|                    |                                            |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to FamilyDollar Stores, Inc., and will be retained by Family Dollar Stores, Inc.,and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Exhibit 32.2







                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph Sinicropi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








  /S/ JOSEPH SINICROPI
  --------------------
 Joseph Sinicropi
 Chief Financial Officer
 November 14, 2007
DISMISS and Opinion Filed November 21, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-01340-CR 

No. 05-22-01342-CR 

CHRISTOPHER AARON QUEZADA, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F18-22354-J, F20-00326-J 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Carlyle, Goldstein, and Breedlove 

Opinion by Justice Goldstein 

Before the Court are appellant’s motions to dismiss these appeals. The 

motions are signed by appellant and his counsel. We grant the motions to dismiss, 

and we dismiss the appeals. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 

221340F.U05 

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/

BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CHRISTOPHER AARON 

QUEZADA, Appellant 

No. 05-22-01340-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District 

Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F18-22354-J. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Goldstein. Justices Carlyle and 

Breedlove participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to dismiss the 

appeal is GRANTED, and we ORDER the appeal DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered November 21, 2023 

 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

CHRISTOPHER AARON 

QUEZADA, Appellant 

No. 05-22-01342-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the Criminal District 

Court No. 3, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F20-00326-J. 

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Goldstein. Justices Carlyle and 

Breedlove participating. 

 Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to dismiss the 

appeal is GRANTED, and we ORDER the appeal DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered November 21, 2023
#### Lillian PIETRAS, Appellant, v. Stephen PIETRAS, Appellee.

No. 71-920.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Roger F. Dykes, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

BJ Services Company

4601 Westway Park Blvd

Houston, Texas 77041

November 25,
2008

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street,
N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549-0405



|    |  |                                                                     
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Re: |  | CEO/CFO Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|    |  | As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BJ Services Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, J.W. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                             
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ J.W. Stewart                                            
|    |  | J. W. Stewart                                               
|    |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | November 25, 2008
# ~ 

# r Project Controls Inc.**~**
04/25/2016 U.S. Department ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

RE: Amendment request to Exemption No. 13546; Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-3602 Project Controls Inc. has been issued an exemption, Regulatory Docket No FAA-2015-3602 and exemption numbered 13546for aerial mapping and surveying using a SenseFiy eBee Drone. Project Controls Inc. requests an amendmenttothe exemption to allow four additional types of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) thatfully comply withthe conditions ofthe Exemption. Project Controls Inc. wishes to add thefollowing unmanned aircraftsystems (UAS)
1. DJI Phantom 4 2. DJI Inspire 1 Pro 3. DJI Matrice 600 4. DJI Spreading Wings S1000

The above UAS will be operated underthe same terms and conditions contained in the existing exemption. Attached are the User Manuals forthe additional UAS. All operations ofthe additional UAS will be in full compliance with theterms ofthe existing exemption. As this is an amendmentto an existing exemption asking onlyforthe addition ofadditional types of unmanned aerial vehicles, Project Controls Inc. respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register forthe requested amendment. Please feel free to contact me should you have any question orconcerns concerning this request for an amendmenttothe Exemption. Enclosures: (1) DJI Phantom 4 User Manual (2) DJI Inspire 1 Pro User Manual (3) DJI Matrice 600 Safety Guide (4) DJI Spreading Wings S1000 User ManualSincerely,

Nathan Hexom Project Controls Inc. PO Box 11991 Bozeman, MT 59719 406-589-6894 phone nathan@project-controls.co
259 La. 801

#### Joseph A. AIREY, Jr., et al. v. Mrs. Marguerite SAMPSON, Widow of Joseph A. AIREY, Sr.

No. 51672.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 15, 1971.

In re: Kenneth E. Pickering, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 250 So.2d 52.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the
financial  statements of Farrel Corporation as of September 27, 1998 and for the
nine months then ended and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
<CURRENCY>                                             US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-27-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                               1,593
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17,425
<ALLOWANCES>                                           191
<INVENTORY>                                         19,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    44,497
<PP&E>                                              23,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                      11,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      61,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               28,052
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                61
<OTHER-SE>                                          26,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        61,080
<SALES>                                             62,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    62,556
<CGS>                                               47,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       47,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                           523
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    645
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           645
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .11
        


</TABLE>