Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 37157 

the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan 

zone. This safety zone will encompass 

all waters of Lake Macatawa in the 

vicinity of Kollen Park within the arc of 

a circle with a 1600-foot radius of a 

center launch position at 42°47.440′ N., 

086°07.621′ W. (NAD 83). This zone 

will be enforced from 10 p.m. until 

11:50 p.m. on July 4, 2015. Should 

inclement weather force a cancellation 

of the fireworks on July 4, 2015, this 

zone will be enforced from 10 p.m. until 

11:50 p.m. on July 6, 2015. 

All vessels must obtain permission 

from the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan, or the on-scene representative 

to enter, move within, or exit the safety 

zone. Requests must be made in 

advance and approved by the Captain of 

the Port before transits will be 

authorized. Approvals will be granted 

on a case by case basis. Vessels and 

persons granted permission to enter the 

safety zone must obey all lawful orders 

or directions of the Captain of the Port 

Lake Michigan or a designated 

representative. 

This document is issued under 

authority of 33 CFR 165.929, Safety 

Zones; Annual events requiring safety 

zones in the Captain of the Port Lake 

Michigan zone, and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). In 

addition to this publication in the 

Federal Register, the Coast Guard will 

provide the maritime community with 

advance notification for the enforcement 

of this zone via Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners or Local Notice to Mariners. 

The Captain of the Port Lake Michigan 

or an on-scene representative may be 

contacted via Channel 16, VHF–FM. 

Dated: June 16, 2015. 

A.B. Cocanour, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2015–16118 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0026; FRL–9928–81– 

Region 8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; North 

Dakota; Alternative Monitoring Plan for 

Milton R. Young Station 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of North Dakota. 

On April 8, 2013, the Governor of North 

Dakota submitted to EPA an alternative 

monitoring plan for Milton R. Young 

Station (MRYS). The plan relates to 

continuous opacity monitoring for Unit 

1 at MRYS. The intended effect of this 

action is to approve a state plan 

established to address minimum 

emission monitoring requirements. The 

EPA is taking this action under section 

110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This rule is effective on August 

31, 2015 without further notice, unless 

EPA receives adverse comment by July 

30, 2015. If adverse comment is 

received, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– 

OAR–2015–0026, by one of the 

following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: Fallon.Gail@epa.gov. 

• Fax: (303) 312–6064 (please alert 

the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing 

comments). 

• Mail: Director, Air Program, 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 

Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 

80202–1129. 

• Hand Delivery: Director, Air 

Program, Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P– 

AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129. Such deliveries 

are only accepted Monday through 

Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

federal holidays. Special arrangements 

should be made for deliveries of boxed 

information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R08–OAR–2015– 

0026. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or email. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through http://

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional instructions on 

submitting comments, go to Section I, 

General Information of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http://

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Program, EPA, Region 8, 

Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 

Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the individual listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

view the hard copy of the docket. You 

may view the hard copy of the docket 

Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 

4:00 p.m., excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gail 

Fallon, Air Program, EPA, Region 8, 

Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 

Denver, Colorado, 80202–1129, (303) 

312–6218, Fallon.Gail@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. General Information 

II. Background 

III. Revision in the April 8, 2013 Submittal 

That Is the Subject of This Document 

IV. EPA’s Analysis of SIP Revision 

V. Consideration of Section 110(l) of the 

Clean Air Act 

VI. Final Action 

VII. Incorporation by Reference 

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
37158 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

1The State created a spreadsheet entitled, ‘‘Unit 

1 Opacity Exceedances.xlsx,’’ with the exceedance 

report data and this is included in the docket. 

I. General Information 

A. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through http://

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD ROM the specific information that is 

claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

a. Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

b. Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

c. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

d. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

e. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

f. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

g. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

h. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Background 

Sections 110(a)(2) and 110(l) of the 

CAA require that a state provide 

reasonable notice and public hearing 

before adopting a SIP revision and 

submitting it to us. To provide for 

public comment, the North Dakota 

Department of Health (NDDH), after 

providing notice, offered to hold a 

public hearing for the alternative 

monitoring plan for MRYS Unit 1. No 

one requested a public hearing so a 

hearing was not conducted. No one 

provided comments on the plan. 

Following the comment period and legal 

review by the North Dakota Attorney 

General’s Office, NDDH adopted the 

alternative monitoring plan for MRYS 

Unit 1 as a SIP revision on March 1, 

2013. The Governor submitted the SIP 

revision to EPA on April 8, 2013. EPA 

acted separately on a portion of the 

April 8, 2013 submittal that revised 

Chapter 2, Section 2.15, Respecting 

Boards. 78 FR 45866, July 30, 2013. 

III. Revision in the April 8, 2013 

Submittal That Is the Subject of This 

Document 

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. 

(Minnkota) currently operates MRYS 

Unit 1, a coal-fired electric generating 

unit located near Center, North Dakota. 

Unit 1 was constructed in the late 

1960’s and began operating in 1970. 

Minnkota is required to continuously 

monitor the opacity of emissions from 

Unit 1 according to 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix P, and North Dakota SIP 

Chapter 8, Source Surveillance. 

The revision in the April 8, 2013 

submittal to be addressed in this 

document included a revision to SIP 

Chapter 8, Source Surveillance, to 

provide an alternative monitoring plan 

for MRYS Unit 1. In May 1977, NDDH 

modified the permit to operate for Unit 

1 requiring the installation and 

operation of continuous opacity 

monitoring (COM) equipment for 

emissions at Unit 1, and the opacity has 

been continuously monitored since the 

compliance date of August 30, 1978. 

In 2006, Minnkota entered into a 

consent decree with NDDH and EPA to 

settle allegations of noncompliance 

under the Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration Program. As part of this 

settlement, Minnkota was required to 

control sulfur dioxide emissions from 

Unit 1. Minnkota has installed a wet 

scrubber which treats all of the flue gas 

from Unit 1 and achieves 95% reduction 

of the inlet sulfur dioxide. However, the 

large amount of moisture from the 

scrubber has made monitoring of the 

opacity in accordance with the 

requirements of 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix P, section 3.1.1 infeasible. 

Specifically, water droplets contained in 

the flue gas could potentially result in 

the existing continuous opacity 

monitor’s overstating the true opacity. 

Because of this change in 

circumstances, Minnkota requested 

alternative monitoring requirements for 

MRYS Unit 1 under 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix P, sections 6.0 and 6.1. NDDH 

agreed with Minnkota that such 

alternative monitoring procedures and 

requirements were warranted given that 

the excess moisture in the stack from 

the wet scrubber interferes with the 

COM and makes the COM data 

inaccurate. As a result, NDDH revised 

SIP Chapter 8, ‘‘Source Surveillance,’’ 

Section 8.3, ‘‘Continuous Emission 

Monitoring Requirements for Existing 

Stationary Sources, including 

amendments to Permits to Operate and 

Department Order.’’ The revision 

provided for a new Section 8.3.2, 

‘‘Continuous Opacity Monitoring for 

M.R. Young Station Unit 1 Main 

Boiler.’’ This new section provides 

alternative monitoring procedures and 

requirements for MRYS Unit 1. 

Under North Dakota Administrative 

Code (NDAC) 33–15–03–01.2, MRYS 

Unit 1 is subject to a 20% opacity limit, 

except for one 6-minute period per hour 

in which up to 40% opacity is allowed. 

Without the scrubber, Minnkota was 

able to comply with the 20% opacity 

limit with limited exceedances. We 

obtained monthly exceedance report 

data from the State which indicate that 

opacity readings greater than the 20% 

standard occurred only 0.30 percent of 

the time for the 2008 through 2010 

three-year average.1 The State has 

indicated that the addition of the wet 

scrubber would be expected to reduce 

visible emissions further. 

Under the alternative monitoring 

plan, Minnkota will ensure compliance 

with the opacity limit through the use 

of a continuous emissions monitoring 

system (CEMS) for particulate matter 

(PM) as well as periodic visible 

emissions reading using test method 9 

from 40 CFR part 60, appendix A. 

Minnkota must comply with specific 

monitoring, recordkeeping, and 

reporting requirements of 40 CFR 60 as 

listed in the alternative monitoring plan 

in Section 8.3.2 for both the PM CEMS 

and the visible emissions testing. 

Among these requirements are: 

1. Minnkota must conduct weekly 

Method 9 tests for six consecutive 

weeks during regular source operation. 

If compliance with opacity is 

demonstrated from the weekly tests, 

Minnkota can begin conducting 

monthly tests. If excess emissions are 

identified, the tests revert to a weekly 

frequency. 

2. Minnkota must monitor the 

filterable PM emission rate with PM 

CEMS. The PM emission rate may not 

exceed 0.052 lb/MMBtu (pounds per 

one million British Thermal Units) (3- 

hour average). 

3. Minnkota must keep records of all 

PM and visible emissions readings and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 37159 

2For purposes of demonstrating compliance with 

PM emissions, Minnkota is required to demonstrate 

compliance with an emission limit of 0.03 lb/

MMBtu for MRYS Unit 1 based on annual stack 

testing under a consent decree between EPA, the 

State of North Dakota, Minnkota, and Square Butte 

Electric Cooperative (Civil Action No. 1:06–CV– 

034). 3 Id. 

must keep these records for at least five 

years. 

4. Minnkota must submit quarterly 

excess emissions reports for both the 

PM CEMS and visible emissions 

readings. The reports must also list any 

time periodic monitoring is not 

conducted as outlined in Section 8.3.2. 

Minnkota must also submit annual 

certifications indicating compliance 

with the visible emission limit. 

Minnkota has developed a 

Compliance Assurance Monitoring 

(CAM) plan for PM in accordance with 

40 CFR 64. The CAM plan indicates that 

20% opacity occurs with a filterable PM 

emission rate of 0.062 lb/MMBtu. The 

alternative monitoring plan sets the 

filterable PM emission limit at 0.052 lb/ 

MMBtu (3-hour average) with a 20% 

visible emission limit (6-minute 

average). The PM emission limit thus 

allows for a modest safety margin when 

compared to the 0.062 lb/MMBtu 

emission rate. For the purposes of this 

SIP revision, the PM CEMS is used only 

for demonstrating compliance with the 

visible emissions standard. This SIP 

revision does not cover monitoring for 

demonstrating compliance with the 

particulate matter emission limit for this 

unit.2

Once the SIP revision is approved by 

EPA, NDDH will begin the procedures 

required under NDAC 33–15–14– 

06(6)(e) to modify the source’s Title V 

permit by incorporating the alternative 

monitoring requirements into the 

permit. NDDH will then have the 

authority to enforce the SIP revision like 

any other permit condition. 

IV. EPA’s Analysis of SIP Revision 

We agree that the addition of the wet 

scrubber at MRYS Unit 1 necessitates an 

alternate means of demonstrating 

opacity compliance, and that the wet 

scrubber will further reduce visible 

emissions from this unit. We have 

evaluated the SIP revision that North 

Dakota submitted for this purpose and 

have determined that the State met the 

requirements for reasonable notice and 

public hearing under section 110(a)(2) 

of the CAA. On October 8, 2013, by 

operation of law under CAA section 

110(k)(1)(B), the SIP revision was 

deemed to have met the minimum 

‘‘completeness’’ criteria found in 40 

CFR part 51, appendix V. 

We are also satisfied that this SIP 

revision will ensure that Minnkota 

complies with the requirements of 40 

CFR 51.214 and 40 CFR part 51, 

appendix P, to continuously monitor 

opacity emissions, and that it will be 

adequate to ensure that Minnkota 

complies with the SIP opacity limits for 

MRYS Unit 1. We reviewed the 

alternative monitoring plan—in 

particular, the PM emission limit of 

0.052 lb/MMBtu (3-hour average)—in 

conjunction with the CAM plan, and we 

agree that this limit will ensure 

equivalency of monitoring methods and 

compliance with the opacity limit as 

required by our regulations. 

Furthermore, it is unlikely that the 

opacity limits will be exceeded, as the 

consent decree PM emission limit of 

0.03 lb/MMBtu would be triggered 

first.3

V. Consideration of Section 110(l) of the 

Clean Air Act 

Section 110(l) of the CAA states that 

a SIP revision cannot be approved if the 

revision would interfere with any 

applicable requirement concerning 

attainment and reasonable further 

progress towards attainment of the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) or any other applicable 

requirements of the CAA. There are no 

nonattainment areas in North Dakota. 

The revision to SIP Chapter 8 regarding 

the alternative monitoring plan for 

MRYS Unit 1 adequately details 

monitoring parameters, frequency of 

monitoring, the PM emission limit, 

recordkeeping, and reporting 

requirements to ensure that the source 

can comply with requirements to 

continuously monitor opacity 

emissions, and the revision will be 

adequate to ensure that Minnkota 

complies with the SIP opacity limits for 

MRYS Unit 1. Therefore, this revision 

does not interfere with attainment or 

maintenance of the NAAQS or other 

applicable requirements of the CAA. 

VI. Final Action 

EPA is approving a revision to the 

North Dakota SIP that the Governor of 

North Dakota submitted on April 8, 

2013. Specifically, EPA is approving an 

alternative monitoring plan for MRYS. 

The plan relates to continuous opacity 

monitoring for Unit 1 at MRYS. EPA 

acted previously on a portion of the 

April 8, 2013 submittal that revised 

Chapter 2, Section 2.15, Respecting 

Boards. 78 FR 45866, July 30, 2013. 

EPA is publishing this rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

revision and anticipates no adverse 

comments. However, in the Proposed 

Rules section of today’s Federal 

Register publication, EPA is publishing 

a separate document that will serve as 

the proposal to approve the SIP revision 

if adverse comments are filed. This rule 

will be effective August 31, 2015 

without further notice unless the 

Agency receives adverse comments by 

July 30, 2015. If the EPA receives 

adverse comments, EPA will publish a 

timely withdrawal in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. EPA will 

address all public comments in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. The EPA will not 

institute a second comment period on 

this action. Any parties interested in 

commenting must do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. 

VII. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference the North 

Dakota Department of Health rules 

described in the amendments to 40 CFR 

part 52 set forth below. The EPA has 

made, and will continue to make, these 

documents generally available 

electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
37160 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 125 / Tuesday, June 30, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq, as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by August 31, 2015. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: June 9, 2015. 

Shaun L. McGrath, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart JJ—North Dakota 

■ 2. In § 52.1820, the table in paragraph 

(d) is amended by revising the second 

entry under ‘‘Milton R. Young Station 

Unit 1’’ and adding a new entry for 

‘‘Milton R. Young Station Unit 1’’ to 

read as follows: 

§ 52.1820 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

Name of source Nature of requirement 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date and 

citation 3 Explanations 

*******

Milton R. Young Station 

Unit 1.

Air pollution control permit to construct for best 

available retrofit technology (BART), 

PTC10007.

2/23/10 4/6/12, 77 FR 20894.

Milton R. Young Station 

Unit 1.

SIP Chapter 8, Section 8.3.2, Continuous Opacity Monitoring for M.R. Young Station Unit 1 

Main Boiler.

3/1/13 6/30/15, [Insert Federal 

Register citation..

* * * * * * * 

3 In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–15533 Filed 6–29–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES