alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,890
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,920
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          20,323
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,981
<LOANS>                                        239,648
<ALLOWANCE>                                        820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,088
<DEPOSITS>                                     226,853
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,818
<LONG-TERM>                                     28,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 287,088
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,290
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,229
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   216
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,735
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,938
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,195
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,540
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      244
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  63
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,902
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,206
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.19
<LOANS-NON>                                        284
<LOANS-PAST>                                       567
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,612
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   618
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       57
<RECOVERIES>                                        15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  820
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            820
        

</TABLE>
# .**~V~VERMONT

StateofVermont Department of Environmental Conservation Air Pollution Control Division 103South Main Street/Bldg 3South Waterbury, VT o567i-o4o2 (802) 241-3840 FAX (802) 241-2590 AGENCYOFNATURAL RESOURCES
February 10, 2012 Mr . Ken Moraff, Deputy Director Office of EcosystemProtection U.S. EPA Region 1 Five Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA02109-3912 RE: Negative Declaration for Sewage Sludge Incineration Units NSPS and Emission Guidelines Dear Mr . Moraff: On March 21, 2011 the U.S. EPA promulgated final New Source Performance Standards (Subpart LLLL) and Emission Guidelines (Subpart MMMM) for Sewage Sludge Incineration Units. This letter certifies that Vermont does not currently have any sewage sludge incinerators nor do we expect any such units in the near future and thus has no sources subject to either the New Source Performance Standard or the Emission Guidelines . Please feel free to contact me or Doug Elliott of my staff at (802) 241-3840 if we can be of any further assistance or if you have any questions or comments regarding this matter. Sincerely, Richard A

. Valentinetti, Director Air Pollution Control Division cc: Ian Cohen, U.S. EPA Region 1 A2 J-5-4 State Correspondence to EPA

Reeional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct ./Rutland/Springfield/St . Johnsbury
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE THREE  MONTHS  ENDED  MARCH 31,  2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           78,920
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                               0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                 0
<EQUITIES>                                          4
<MORTGAGE>                                          0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                104,649
<CASH>                                            873
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              15,667
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          53,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 294,093
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 60,979
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 14
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  43,336
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,211
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 39,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,169
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   294,093
<PREMIUMS>                                       8,401
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,740
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                       3,351
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      1,349
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,473
<INCOME-TAX>                                       259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,214
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,214
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Rodney BLACKWELL.

No. 60592.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 8, 1977.

In re: Rodney Blackwell applying for Remedial Writs.

Writ granted. It is ordered that Rodney Blackwell be returned to the parish prison from Angola pending the finality of his conviction.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7631 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the permissible 

use of funds timeframe under the Coronavirus Relief Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2020 

Mr. FITZPATRICK (for himself, Ms. DEAN, Ms. WILD, and Ms. HOULAHAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend 

the permissible use of funds timeframe under the 

Coronavirus Relief Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coronavirus Relief 

5 Fund Local Government Flexibility Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7631 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

2 Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘December 30, 

4 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘March 31, 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
----

----

|   | (1)                  |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and                          |
|--------|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                 |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)                  |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|   |                 |   |                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|   |                 |   |                                                                                                                                                                |   |
| Date:  | October      6, 2008 |   | By:                                                                                                                                                       | /s/      VLADO P. HRELJANOVIC |   |
|   |                 |   |                                                                                                                                                                | Vlado      P. Hreljanovic |   |
|   |                 |   |                                                                                                                                                                | President,      Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the      Board  |   |
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 112 (Monday, June 11, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 26846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12492]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 222, 237, and 252

[Docket DARS-2018-0032]
RIN 0750-AJ66


Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of 
DFARS Clause ``Right of First Refusal of Employment-Closure of Military 
Installations'' (DFARS Case 2018-D002)

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making a correction to the final rule published on May 
30, 2018, which amended the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation 
Supplement (DFARS) to remove a clause that is duplicative of an 
existing Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause. The document 
contained an incorrect RIN number.

DATES: Effective June 8, 2018.
    Applicable beginning May 30, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, telephone 571-372-
6106.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rule published at 83 FR 24892 
on May 30, 2018, in the third column, the following correction is made 
to this rule:
    The RIN number cited, RIN 0750-AJ54, is corrected to read RIN 0750-
AJ66.

Amy G. Williams,
Deputy, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2018-12492 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7620

KENNETH MICHAEL BOEKENOOGEN, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. R. DAVID MITCHELL, Supt.; THEODIS BECK, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:09-CV-00099-JAB-DPD)

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Michael Boekenoogen, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorneys General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Michael Boekenoogen seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Boekenoogen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Boekenoogen’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.14

 

Power of Attorney

 

THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY (hereinafter, the “Power of Attorney”) is executed by Zuyu DING (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) as of December 5, 2011 and issued to Xin ZHOU (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) (hereinafter, the “Entrusted Person”).

 

I, Zuyu DING, hereby entrust the Entrusted Person with full representative power to exercise the following rights owned by me in the capacity of a shareholder of Shanghai Yi Xin E-Commerce Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “Company”) on my behalf:

 

(1)         As my representative, to propose to convene and attend shareholders’ meetings of the Company according to the articles of association of the Company;

 

(2)         As my representative, to exercise, on my behalf, voting rights on all matters requiring discussion or resolutions of the shareholders’ meetings of the Company, including without limitation, the appointment and election of the Company’s directors and other officers, who should be appointed and removed by the shareholders;

 

(3)         As my representative, to exercise other voting rights of a shareholder as specified in the articles of association of the Company (including any other shareholder voting rights as specified in the amended articles of association).

 

I hereby irrevocably confirm that this Power of Attorney shall continue to be valid until the Shareholder Voting Right Proxy Agreement executed by and between Shanghai Yi Yue Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “WFOE”), the Company and the shareholders of the Company as of December 5, 2011 expires or is early terminated, unless the WFOE gives me a direction to replace the Entrusted Person.

 

Authorization is hereby made.

 

	
 
    	
Name: Zuyu DING
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/ Zuyu DING
    
	
 
    	
Date: December 5, 2011
    


 

1
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edward COLLINS v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., Warden, etc.

No. 60497.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 16, 1977.

In re: Edward Collins, applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ denied. Return from Criminal District Court indicates that a hearing has been set for October 3,1977. Hence, application is moot.
No. 00-6507.

#### Leche *v.*Tanou, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed *in forma pauperis [ante,*p. 1110] denied.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00445-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 236th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 236-321758-20

Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

CREEKWOOD COMMUNITY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant

V.

JOHN WOLFE AND KATHY WOLFE, Appellees
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On February 7, 2022, we notified appellant that the trial-court clerk responsible 

for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us that appellant has not arranged 

to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant arranged to pay for the clerk’s record 

and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record, 

we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 

42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 3, 2022
**Exhibit99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED BYSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. (the“Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Fred A. Gysi, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Fred A. Gysi        |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Fred A. Gysi            |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | June  11, 2003     |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            83,743
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           4
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 109,704
<CASH>                                             324
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               7,677
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          43,243
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 289,434
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 58,695
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                104
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  43,444
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,799
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 56,866
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,169
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   289,434
<PREMIUMS>                                      20,281
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,503
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,329
<BENEFITS>                                       9,206
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,282
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,142
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,715
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,265
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,449
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Donald HEFFNER v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38272.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
PARTICIPATING AGENCIES* 

Alabama Attorney General’s Office Alaska Department of Law Arizona Attorney General’s Office California – Consumer Protection Division of the District Attorney for 

the County of Los Angeles 

California – Consumer Protection Division of the District Attorney for 

the County of San Diego 

California – Consumer Protection Division of the District Attorney for 

the County of Riverside 

California – Consumer Protection Division of the District Attorney for 

the County of Santa Clara 

California – Los Angeles City Attorney Colorado Attorney General’s Office Connecticut Attorney General’s Office Delaware Attorney General’s Office District of Columbia Attorney General’s Office Federal Trade Commission Florida Attorney General’s Office Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services 

Idaho Attorney General’s Office Illinois Attorney General’s Office Indiana Attorney General’s Office Iowa Attorney General’s Office Kentucky Attorney General’s Office Louisiana Attorney General’s Office 

Michigan Attorney General’s Office Mississippi Attorney General’s Office Missouri Attorney General’s Office Nevada Attorney General’s Office New Hampshire Attorney General’s OfficNew Jersey Attorney General’s Office New York Department of State, Division North Carolina Attorney General’s Office North Dakota Attorney General’s Office Ohio Attorney General’s Office Oklahoma Attorney General’s Office Oregon Department of Justice Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office South Carolina Attorney General’s Office Tennessee Attorney General’s Office Texas Attorney General’s Office United States Attorney’s Office for the MUnited States Attorney’s Office for the NUnited States Attorney’s Office for the SoUnited States Department of Justice United States Treasury Inspector General Utah Department of Commerce, Division 

Virginia Attorney General’s Office West Virginia Attorney General’s Office Wyoming Attorney General’s Office 

* Additional non-public actions were taken by 

Operation Call it Quits law enforcement partners.