alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8221-8222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4430]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Technical Information Service

NTIS Advisory Board Meeting

AGENCY: National Technical Information Service, Technology 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of partially closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 
2, notice is hereby given that the National Technical Information 
Service Advisory Board (the ``Board'') will meet on Tuesday, March 18, 
1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., and on Wednesday, March 19, 1997, 
from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The session on Wednesday, March 19, 1997, 
will be closed to the Public.
    The Board was established under the authority of 15 U.S.C. 3704(c), 
and was Chartered on September 15, 1989. The Board is composed of five 
members appointed by the Secretary of Commerce who are eminent in such 
fields as information resources management, information technology, and 
library and information services. The purpose of the meeting is to 
review and make

[[Page 8222]]

recommendations regarding general policies and operations of NTIS, 
including policies in connection with fees and charges for its 
services. The agenda will include a progress report on NTIS activities, 
an update on the progress of FedWorld, and a discussion of NTIS' long 
range plans. The closed session discussion is scheduled to begin at 
9:00 a.m. and end at 4:00 p.m. on March 19, 1997. The session will be 
closed because premature disclosure of the information to be discussed 
would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of NTIS' 
business plans.

DATES: The meeting will convene on March 18, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. and 
adjourn at 4:00 p.m. and convene again on March 19, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. 
and adjourn at 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held in Room 2029 Sills Building, National 
Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, 
Virginia 22161.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation 
on March 18, 1997, and closed on March 19, 1997. Approximately thirty 
minutes will be set aside on March 18, 1997, for comments or questions 
from the public. Seats will be available for the public and for the 
media on a first-come, first-served basis. Any member of the public may 
submit written comments concerning the Board's affairs at any time. 
Copies of the minutes of the open session meeting will be available 
within thirty days of the meeting from the address given below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Lucas, NTIS Advisory Board 
Secretary, National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal 
Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Telephone: (703) 487-4636; Fax (703) 
487-4093.

    Dated: February 19, 1997.
Donald R. Johnson,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-4430 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-04-M
```
#### Joseph D. COZZI and John J. McNamara a/k/a Hector Newman, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. T-159, T-160.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION*
     (Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)

         Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as created  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of WindsorTech, Inc. hereby
certify, to such officers' knowledge, that:


         (1) the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of WindsorTech,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the  "Report")  fully
complies with the with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),  as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: May 12, 2005                     /s/ Marc Sherman
                                       ----------------
                                       Marc Sherman
                                       Chairman of the Board and
                                       Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 12, 2005                     /s/ Edward L. Cummings
                                       ----------------------
                                       Edward L. Cummings
                                       Chief Financial Officer


__________________
* The foregoing  certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended,  and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof,  regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>
#### Dolores E. CEVAAL, Appellant, v. Calvin D. CEVAAL, Appellee.

No. 70-713.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 28, 1970.

Donald J. Sasser, of Law Offices of Ronald Sales, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Douglas C. Fulton, of Burns and Weber, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Stockham v. Stockham, Fla.1964, 168 So.2d 320, and Cot*325ton v. Cotton, Fourth District Court of Appeal, 239 So.2d 865, opinion filed October 9, 1970.

CROSS, C. J., and McCAIN and REED, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                   3,536
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           57,279
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,300
<INVENTORY>                             62,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       130,251
<PP&E>                                  61,906
<DEPRECIATION>                          23,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         194,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   47,719
<BONDS>                                 83,063
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                10,000
<OTHER-SE>                              43,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           194,083
<SALES>                                 76,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        76,686
<CGS>                                   34,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           71,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          3,285
<INCOME-TAX>                             1,380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,905
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,905
<EPS-BASIC>                                .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .25



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Gregg L. Engles, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Dean Holding Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report; 4. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Dean Holding Company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toDean Holding Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Dean Holding Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the period covered by this quarterly report, based on suchevaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in Dean Holding Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Dean Holding Company’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dean HoldingCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.5. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dean Holding Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Dean HoldingCompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in Dean Holding Company’s internal control over financial reporting.           /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES             Gregg L. Engles      *Chief Executive Officer*  November 14, 2005      
21
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.P.M.

, a child

, * From the 318 th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM66016

.

Vs

. No. 11

- 2 1

- 00 144

- C V * January 27, 2022

* Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J., and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that t he appeal

should be dismissed for want of prosecution . Therefore, in accordance with this

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40065

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

WILL ROGER LYNN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 363

Filed: February 14, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan, District Judge. 

Order revoking probation and requiring execution of unified ten-year sentence 

with five-year determinate term for injury to child, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Will Roger Lynn pled guilty to injury to child, a felony. Idaho Code § 18-1501(1). The 

district court imposed a determinate ten-year sentence, suspended the sentence and placed Lynn 

on probation for seven years. Subsequently, Lynn admitted to violating several terms of the 

probation, and the district court consequently revoked probation and ordered execution of the 

original sentence. However, on its own motion, the district court reduced the sentence to a 

unified term of ten years with five years determinate. Lynn appeals, contending that the district 

court abused its discretion by failing to retain jurisdiction upon revocation of his probation.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). 

When we review a sentence that is ordered into execution following a period of 

probation, we will examine the entire record encompassing events before and after the original 

judgment. State v. Hanington, 148 Idaho 26, 29, 218 P.3d 5, 8 (Ct. App. 2009). We base our 

review upon the facts existing when the sentence was imposed as well as events occurring 

between the original sentencing and the revocation of the probation. Id.

Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot 

say that the district court abused its discretion by failing to retain jurisdiction upon revocation of 

probation. Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing execution of Lynn’s reduced 

sentence is affirmed.
**Exhibit23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-113848, No. 333-07785, No. 333-65452, and No.333-92403), Form S-3 (No. 333-45294 and No. 333-88540) and Form S-1(No.333-89958) of A.D.A.M., Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2004, relatingto the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Atlanta, Georgia               |
| March 29, 2005                 |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Cubic Corporation

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of December 31, 2010, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three months ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2010 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated December 8, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

 
|                    | /s/   ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                    |                             |
|                    |                             |
| San   Diego, California |                             |
| February 2,   2011 |                             |

 

----
#### Samuel HAUGHTON v. FIREMAN’S FUND AMERICAN INSURANCE CO.

No. 60765.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 14, 1977.

In re: Samuel Haughton applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 349 So.2d 385.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7190

DAVID E. DIXON, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA; JOHN T. HENRY,Horry County Sheriff; RALPH VAUGHT, Administrator, J. Reuben Long Detention Center; LIEUTENANT BOYD, J. Reuben Long Supervisory Officer; KENNETH I. GRATE, Lieutenant, J. Reuben Long Detention Center Supervisory Officer;RANDY GERALD, Sergeant, J. Reuben Long Detention Officer; CORPORAL MOSES, J. Re uben Long Detention Center Officer; NURSE STACKHOUSE, J. Reuben Long Detention Center; VICKIE LEWIS, Nurse, J. Reuben Long Detention Center; MRS. GRISSETT, Nurse, J. Reuben Long Detention Center; ANN ANDERSON, J. Reuben Long Detention Center; DOUGLAS FREEMAN, Horry County Administrator, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1463-3BD) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David E. Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & SENN, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Appellant's motion for summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Samuel GASKINS, Jr., a minor, by Samuel Gaskins, Sr., his father and next friend, Appellant, v. John ANDRACHAK, Jr., and Gray Drug Stores, Inc., of Miami, an Ohio corporation, Appellees.

No. 69-696.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Jan. 16, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Louis Weissing, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

AARON STEVENS,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 137, 2016

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1406014389

§

§

§

Submitted: June 1, 2016

Decided: June 3, 2016

ORDER

This 3rd day of June 2016, it appears to the Court that, on May 17, 2016, the 

Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant to show cause why this 

appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file an opening brief and appendix 

in this matter on or before May 5, 2016 and for his failure to pay the Supreme 

Court filing fee. The appellant has not responded to the notice to show cause 

within the required ten-day period and therefore dismissal of this appeal is deemed 

to be unopposed.
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4560]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.
    Agreement No.: 232-011566.
    Title: NSCSA/Wallenius Line Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: National Shipping Company of Saudi Arabia (``NSCSA'') 
Wallenius Rederierna AB (``Wallenius'').
    Synopsis: The proposed Agreement permits Wallenius to charter space 
from NSCSA, on its vessels operating in the trade from Livorno, Italy 
to U.S. Atlantic & Gulf Coast ports, and for the parties to coordinate 
vessel operations. The parties have requested a shortened review 
period.

    .Dated: February 20, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4560 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M