FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Jul y 20, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 05- 16599 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 5 - 0 0 4 1 6 - C V- OR L - 2 8 - DA B C H A R L I E H . D A V I S , L E Y D A E . C H E W , bo th i nd i vi du al l y and on behal f of L e qui ndr aK e i on D a vi s ( 19) a nd C h a lis e D a v is ( 2 0 ) , P la in tif f s - A p p e lla n ts , v ersu s H O N . G E O R G E W I N S L O W , J R ., R I C H A R D S . G R A H A M , B A R B A R A F A N C H E R J O N E S , A tto rn e y , K A T H Y A . J I M E N E Z , A tto rn e y , E R I K K . N E I T Z K E , A tto rn e y , e t a l., D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lle e s .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe M i ddl e D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( Ju l y 20, 2006)2

B efo re B L A C K , B A R K E T T an dW IL S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: C h ar li e D av is an dL ey d a C h ew , p ro ce ed in g p ro se , ap p ea l th e d istrict co u rt’s di s m i s s a l of

the i r42 U . S . C . § 1983 c om pl a i nt . D a vi s a nd C he w a l l e ge d tha tthe a c tio n s o f

w h ic h th e yc o m p la in w e r e ta k e n b yth e s ta te - a c to rd e f e n d a n ts in th e ir in d iv idu a l c ap a c itie s . D a v is a n dC h e w a s s e rte dav a r ie tyo f c o n tr a c tu a l, c o n s titu tio n a l, a n dc iv il r ig h ts s ta tu to ryc au s e s o f a c tio n , in c lu d in g 4 2 U .S .C . § 1983 a nd a s ke d f

orm one yda m a ge s , c us t odyof C he w ’ s s on, r e i ns t a t e m e ntof D a v is ’s d r iv e r ’s lic e n s e , a n n u lm e n t o f C h e w ’s d iv o r c e a g r e e m e n t w ith H a rryS p e r l, puni t i ve da m a ge s , a tt orne y ’ s f e e s , a nd uns pe c i f

i e d i nj unc t i ve r e l i e f

. D a vi s a nd C he w m a de i tc l e a ri n the i ra r gum e nt s t o the di s tr i c tc ourttha tthe ya r e c ha l l e ngi ng th e ju d g m e n ts a g a in s t th e m in s ta te c o u rt. T he R ooke r - Fe ldm an do ctri ne depri ved the di stri ctcourtof subj ec t -m att er j u ri sd i ct i o n t o h ear D av i s an dC h ew ’ s cl ai m s. T he R ooke r - Fe ldm an doc tr i ne e s tab lis h e s th a t f

e d e r a l c o u rts , o th e rth a n th e S up r e m e C o u rt, d o n o t h a v e s u b je c tm att erj uri sdi ct i on ov erac t i on s thatef fe ct i vel y s ee k t o app ea l st at e c ou rt ju d g m e n ts . A m o s v. G l

yn n C o u n t

y B d. o f T ax A ssesso rs , 347 F . 3d 1249, 1265 n. 11 ( 1 1 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) ; D . C . C our t of Appe al s v . Fe ldm an , 4 6 0 U .S . 4 6 2 , 4 8 2 , 1 0 3 S . C t. 1 3 0 3 , 1 3 1 5 , 7 5 L . E d . 2 d2 0 6 ( 1 9 8 3 ) ; R ooke rv . Fi de l i t yT r us t C o. , 263 U . S . 413,3

415- 16, 44 S . C t . 149, 150, 68 L . E d. 362 ( 1923) . D a vi s a nd C he w a l l e ge nothi ng to in d ic a te th a t th e yw e r e in a n yw a yd e p r iv e do f th e o p p o rtu n ityto r a is e th e ir i ssu es i n th e st at e co u rtp ro ceed i n g s. T o th e ex t en tth atD av i s an dC h ew rai se i ss ues thatext end b ey on d a di ss at i sf ac t i on w i th the ou t com e of thei r s t at e c ou rt c a s e s , th o s e is s u e s w e r e d e c id e db yth e s ta te c o u rts o rin e x tr ic ab lyb o u n dup in th o se d eci si o n s. AF F I RME D.