alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 61]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34147]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 122397F]


Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will hold a 
meeting to discuss stock assessment plans for 1998. The meeting will be 
open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will begin on January 12, 1998 at 1:00 p.m. (Pacific 
Standard Time), and continue at 8 a.m. on January 13 until business is 
completed.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Council office, 2130 SW 
Fifth Avenue, Suite 224, Portland, OR 97201.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Six, Executive Director; 
telephone: (503) 326-6352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is to plan the 
stock assessment process for groundfish species in 1998. The meeting 
will consider revisions to the terms of reference used for 1997 stock 
assessments, revise the goals and objectives for the annual stock 
assessment cycle, develop a calendar for 1998 stock assessment 
activities, confirm the list of species to be assessed in 1998, 
designate the resources and personnel for the assessments and the 
reviews, and discuss ways of improving coordination of the process.
    Although other issues not contained in this agenda may come before 
this Council for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 
Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues may not be the 
subject of formal Council action during this meeting. Council action 
will be restricted to those issues specifically identified in the 
agenda listed in this notice.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to Mr. Eric Greene at 
(503) 326-6352 at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
Bruce C. Morehead,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 97-34147 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
1 Nesky, Anthony

To: Nesky, Anthony Subject: FW: Hearings for Proposed EPA regulations, new Subpart F.

Begin forwarded message:

From: Nancy Kile < nan1868@hotmail.com >
Date: March 23, 2015 at 5:52:29 PM EDT

To: " Rosencrantz.ingrid@epa.gov " < rosencrantz.ingrid@epa.gov > Subject: Hearings for Proposed EPA regulations, new Subpart F.

Ingrid Rosencrantz, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, Radiation Protection Division, Mailcode 6608T, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW. Washington, DC 20460;

03-25-2015

Dear Ms. Rosencrantz, I am a resident landowner in Sioux County within the panhandle of Nebraska. Cameco’s Crow Butte ISL/ISR mine has encompassed my ho metown of Crawford, NE. Cameco uranium production and expansion proposals are within two miles of Craw ford and 8 miles of my Sioux county residence. The Azarga/Powertech ISL/IS R is in Fall River County, SD, adjacent to Dawes County and Sioux County, NE.

I was astonished to find my region is excluded from public hearings plan ned for TX and WY on the proposed EPA regulations, new Subpart F. Th e Pine Ridge region in cludes the panhandle of Nebraska and residents here will be impact ed by the new EPA regulations on groundwater protection and monitoring. All peoples, Lakota, American and dual c itizens are entitled to participation in processes that set policies that im pact lifestyle, health a nd welfare. Let us serve environmental justice principles and schedule a h earing in Chadron, NE so that area residents have an opportunity to be heard by EPA. Tha nk you for your considerat ion into this matter. Please schedule the Chadron, NE meeting as soon as possible.

Sincerely, Nancy Kile

831 White River Road Crawford, NE 69339

308-665-1378

nan1868@hotmail.com
Served: March 31, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

NOTICE SHORTENING ANSWER PERIOD

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0061

On March 22 , 2011, G ulfstream International Group, Inc. (“GIA”) and VPAA CO. ( “ New GIA”), (coll ectively, the “Joint Applicants”) filed a joint application in Docket DOT

- OST

- 2011

- 0061 requesting that the Department transfer the commuter air carrier authorization held by GIA to New GIA pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 41105

. Concurrently, the Joint Applica nt s filed a motion requesting that the Department shorten th e answer period in this case to March 31, 2011

, 1 to facilitate their request for expedited action in this matter and to enable the Joint Applicants to proceed with certain commercial transaction s

.

On March 29, 2011 , the Joint Applicants advised the Department that there were no objections to shortening the answer period or the underlying application

.

Under these circumstances, we have decided to grant the Joint Applicants’ request for a

shortene d answer period in this case. Therefore, acting under authority assigned in

14 CFR 385.12, answers to the Joint Applicants request to transfer the commuter authority held by GIA to New GIA will now be due no later than 12:00 p.m. on April 1, 2011

.

We w ill serve this notice by email on all parties served with the request. We authorize answers to the application to be served by email or facsimile.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this notice under the Department’s Regulations, 14 CFR 385.30, may file their petitions within 10 days of the service date of this

order.

1 Under the Department’s regulations, answers to the transfer request would be due on April 12, 2011 ( see 14 CFR § 302.204).2

This notice is effective immediately and the filing of a petition for review shall not alter its

effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director
Office of Aviatio n Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at: http:// www.regulations .gov
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis EVANS, Jr.

No. 60988.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Louis Evans, Jr., applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Natchitoches.

Denied.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., are of the opinion a writ should be granted.
----

----

EXHIBIT (32)(b)

| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                                              |   |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: October 27, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Donna L. Belusar                         |   |
|                   |   | Donna L. Belusar                                  |   |
|                   |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                   |   |                                              |   |
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7597 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress a report on the 

research and studies being conducted or funded by the Department 

of Defense to assess the health effects of burn pits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2020 

Mr. RUIZ (for himself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, and Mr. WELCH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to submit to Congress 

a report on the research and studies being conducted 

or funded by the Department of Defense to assess the 

health effects of burn pits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON RESEARCH AND STUDIES ON 

4 HEALTH EFFECTS OF BURN PITS. 

5 The Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congres6 sional defense committees and the Committees on Vet7 erans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 

8 Senate a detailed report on the status, methodology, and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7597 IH

1 culmination timeline of all the research and studies being 

2 conducted or funded by the Department of Defense to as3 sess the health effects of burn pits. The report shall in4 clude an identification of any challenges and potential 

5 challenges with respect to completing such research and 

6 studies and recommendations to address such challenges. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Jimmy C. COPELAND v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47854.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 25, 1974.

William P. Dodson, Oxford, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Wayne Snuggs, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Alcorn County; L. T. Senter, Jr., Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and SMITH, ROBERTSON, SUGG and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS D IVISION O NE

S TATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v. J OSE F. MERCADO , Petitioner

.

No. 1 CA-CR 20-0621 PRPC

P etition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR1996-002154 The Honorable Roy C. Whitehead , Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL
The Nolan Law Firm , Mesa By Todd E. Nolan, Vicki A. R. Lopez Counsel for Petitioner

M EMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge David B. Gass, Judge Michael J. Brown, and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court

. FILED 7-29-2021STATE v. MERCADO Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Jose F. Mercado seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief. This is petitioner’s third petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 5 77, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
Consumer Sentinel Network Preregistration Checklist 

Welcome to the registration process. Your organization must register in a single session, so this checklist 

can help you collect the required information before you get started.

 

1. So who can apply? 

Anyone from your agency can apply at https://register.consumersentinel.gov, but you need an approving 

authority to sign the confidentiality agreement between the FTC and your agency. That’s the person with 

legal authority to sign the confidentiality agreement for your organization or subgroup. It’s usually the 

manager of the applying division or agency. 

2. Do I have to apply for my entire agency?

No, you can apply just for a subdivision if that’s the only area that will use Sentinel. For example, if you 

work in a police department and only want access for the detectives’ bureau, you can apply for the bureau. 

So the approving authority signing the agreement would be the bureau manager. 

3. I’m being asked for an organization Administrator. What’s that? Your Administrator is the point of contact with Sentinel support staff and the keeper of your

organization’s passcode. When new users from your organization apply for access to the Network, the

FTC e-mails the Administrator, who then provides approved individual users with the passcode.

4. How do I get my organization’s e-mail domain name?

Your IT support staff can help you with that. To ensure secure access, all Sentinel users in your 

organization must have a matching domain name, which is the part of your email address that comes after 

the @ sign. Examples are uspis.gov, or dot.state.nc.us. 

 

5. I need help with this process.

Please contact the Help Desk at 877–701–9595 or registrationhelp@consumersentinel.gov. 

6. I now have access to Sentinel. How do I use this system?

There are tutorials located under the “Help Desk” tab when you log in. If you want to join a training 

session, you can contact us at the Help Desk at 877–701–9595 or registrationhelp@consumersentinel.gov, 

and we’ll get you into the next training session, which is conducted via Internet.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 12-A

                        Delmarva Power & Light Company

                      Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                      ----------------------------------
                            (Dollars in Thousands)
                            ----------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   12 Months
                                     Ended                  Year  Ended  December  31,
                                  September 30,   ---------------------------------------------------
                                      1999          1998      1997       1996       1995      1994
                                    ---------     --------  --------  ---------  --------   ---------
<S>                                <C>            <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>
Income before extraordinary item    $136,549      $112,410  $105,709   $116,187  $117,488   $108,310
                                    ---------     --------  --------  ---------  --------   ---------
Income taxes                          88,426        72,276    72,155     78,340    75,540     67,613
                                    ---------     --------  --------  ---------  --------   ---------
Fixed charges:
 Interest on long-term debt
  including amortization of
  discount, premium and
  expense                             78,875        81,132    78,350     69,329    65,572    61,128
 Other interest                        8,159         9,328    12,835     12,516    10,353     9,336
 Preferred dividend require-
  ments of a subsidiary
  trust                                5,688         5,688     5,687      1,390        -         -
                                    ---------     --------  --------  ---------  --------   ---------
  Total fixed charges                 92,722        96,148    96,872     83,235    75,925     70,464
                                    ---------     --------  --------  ---------  --------   ---------

Nonutility capitalized interest           -            -        (208)      (311)     (304)      (256)
                                    ---------     --------  --------  ---------  --------   ---------

Earnings before income taxes
 and fixed charges                  $317,697      $280,834  $274,528   $277,451  $268,649   $246,131
                                    =========     ========  ========  =========  ========   =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges      3.43          2.92      2.83       3.33      3.54       3.49
</TABLE>

For purposes of computing the ratio, earnings are income before extraordinary
item plus income taxes and fixed charges, less nonutility capitalized interest.
Fixed charges consist of interest on long- and short-term debt, amortization of
debt discount, premium, and expense, dividends on preferred securities of a
subsidiary trust, and interest expense associated with DPL's leases.
#### 4TH DIMENSION INTERIORS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. TIFFANY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-564.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 19, 1973.

Ainslee R. Ferdie, Miami, for appellant.

Daniel Sepler and Paul G. Block, Hialeah, Lubow & Gary, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant third party plaintiff appeals an order of the trial court dismissing its amended third party complaint with prejudice.

In an action by Decorator Services, Limited against appellant for services rendered in carpet installations for the plaintiff, the appellant filed a third party complaint against appellee and others. Appellee’s motion to dismiss that complaint was granted on May 5, 1971, and appellant was given 20 days in which to amend its third party complaint in order to state an appropriate cause of action. The amended third party complaint was filed on June 11, 1971, some seventeen days late. During the same period of time, the co-third party defendants moved to quash the service on the original third party complaint. The motion was granted but upon interlocutory appeal was reversed by this court on January 18, 1972. 4th Dimension Interiors, Inc. v. Decorator Services, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 571. It was not until April 5, 1972, that appellee moved to dismiss appellant’s amended third party complaint with prejudice due to its untimely filing. Thus appellee’s motion to dismiss came approximately ten months after the complaint to which it was directed was filed and almost three months after this court’s decision in the related appeal.

We have reviewed the record in light of the foregoing facts, considering the mutual *128time delays of both appellant and appellee, and are of the opinion that the trial judge abused his discretion in dismissing the amended third party complaint of appellant with prejudice on the grounds of the untimeliness. Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5008]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-9299]


Notice for Publication; Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Section 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 
Act of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(h)(1), will be issued to 
Calista Corporation for approximately 36.8 acres. The lands involved 
are in the vicinity of Nunivak Island, Alaska.

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 2 N., R. 104 W.,
Sec. 36.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until March 31, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 
4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Patricia A. Baker,
 Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-5008 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-07-2018]

On January 31, 2018, Movado Group, Inc. submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 49J, in Moonachie, New Jersey.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (83 FR 5987, February 12, 2018). On May 31, 2018, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: May 31, 2018.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2018-12147 Filed 6-5-18; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-112360 and 333-136116) and Form S-8 (No. 333-130235, 333-122155, 333-138863, 333-122148, 333-112213, 333-71374, 333-66993, 333-50292, 333-03656, 333-92525, 333-39065 and 333-50296) of AdeptTechnology, Inc. of our report dated September 10, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

*/s/ Armanino McKenna LLP*

San Ramon, California 

September 12, 2007
#### Kenneth E. GRANT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-301.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.