Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 5 / Wednesday, January 8, 1997 / Notices 1143

were imported pursuant to contracts

executed after 11/5/90.

Burden Estimate: The estimated

burden is 280 hours annually.

2. Title: Alcohol Misuse Prevention

Program for Personnel Engaged in

Specified Aviation Activities.

OMB No. 2120–0571.

Type of Request: Extension of A

Currently Approved Collection.

Affected Public: The respondents are

an estimated 5,300 specified aviation

employers.

Abstract: This regulation requires

specified aviation employers to

implement an FAA-approved alcohol

misuse prevention program, (AMPP), to

provide the FAA with an AMPP

certification statement, and to report

annually on alcohol testing results.

Burden Estimate: The estimated

burden is 14,000 hours annually.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the

Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, Office of Management and

Budget, 725–17th Street, NW,

Washington, DC 20503, Attention DOT

Desk Officer.

Comments are Invited on: Whether

the proposed collection of information

is necessary for the proper performance

of the functions of the Department,

including whether the information will

have practical utility; the accuracy of

the Department’s estimate of the burden

of the proposed information collection;

ways to enhance the quality, utility and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and ways to minimize the

burden of the collection of information

on respondents, including the use of

automated collection techniques or

other forms of information technology.

Issued in Washington, DC, on December

23, 1996.

Phillip A. Leach,

Clearance Officer, United States Department

of Transportation.

[FR Doc. 97–383 Filed 1–7–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P

Coast Guard

[CGD 96–070]

National Baseline Requirements Group

Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is

undertaking an effort to identify the

minimum capabilities a Vessel Traffic

Service (VTS) must have to serve its

wide range of users. The Coast Guard

needs to establish national baseline

operating requirements that will permit

it to take advantage of available, off-theshelf systems that will be less expensive

to build and operate. In order to have a

comprehensive representation of all

waterway users, the Coast Guard has

invited national representatives of

several maritime organizations to

provide input to assist in the

development of these requirements.

This is the first meeting of the National

Baseline Requirements Group. There

will be a series of 4–6 meetings which

will continue through early 1997.

DATES: The meeting will be held January

15, 1997, from 9 a.m. to approximately

5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in

the Marine Board Offices, National

Academy of Science, 2001 Wisconsin

Avenue, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peter Johnson, Marine Board, National

Academy of Science, 2001 Wisconsin

Avenue, Washington, DC, telephone

(202) 334–3157, fax (202) 334–3789.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Attendance is open to the public. With

advance notice, and as time permits,

members of the public may make oral

presentations during the meeting.

Persons wishing to make oral

presentations should notify the person

listed above under the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT no later than the

day before the meeting. Written material

may be submitted prior to, during, or

after the meeting.

The agenda for the meeting consists of

the following items:

(1) VTS Program Update and VTS

Authority.

(2) Overview of Coast Guard Mission

Needs.

(3) Scope—Critical Areas for VTS.

(4) Coast Guard Strawman

Operational Requirements Menu and

Coast Guard Expectations and Needs.

(5) Development of Minimum Safety

Baseline VTS.

(6) Plans for Next Meeting.

(7) Adjournment.

Dated: December 31, 1996.

J.C. Card,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant

Commandant for Marine Safety and

Environmental Protection.

[FR Doc. 97–421 Filed 1–7–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–14–M

National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration

[Docket No. 96–126; Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for

Decision That Nonconforming 1986

Mazda RX–7 Passenger Cars Are

Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for

decision that nonconforming 1986

Mazda RX–7 passenger cars are eligible

for importation.

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt

by the National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration (NHTSA) of a petition

for a decision that a 1986 Mazda RX–7

that was not originally manufactured to

comply with all applicable Federal

motor vehicle safety standards is

eligible for importation into the United

States because (1) it is substantially

similar to a vehicle that was originally

manufactured for importation into and

sale in the United States and that was

certified by its manufacturer as

complying with the safety standards,

and (2) it is capable of being readily

altered to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments

on the petition is February 7, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to

the docket number and notice number,

and be submitted to: Docket Section,

Room 5109, National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St.,

SW., Washington, DC 20590. [Docket

hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle

Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–

5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A)

(formerly section 108(c)(3)(A)(i)(I) of the

National Traffic and Motor Vehicle

Safety Act (the Act)), a motor vehicle

that was not originally manufactured to

conform to all applicable Federal motor

vehicle safety standards shall be refused

admission into the United States unless

NHTSA has decided that the motor

vehicle is substantially similar to a

motor vehicle originally manufactured

for importation into and sale in the

United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.

30115 (formerly section 114 of the Act),

and of the same model year as the

model of the motor vehicle to be

compared, and is capable of being

readily altered to conform to all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards.
1144 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 5 / Wednesday, January 8, 1997 / Notices

Petitions for eligibility decisions may

be submitted by either manufacturers or

importers who have registered with

NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR part 592. As

specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA

publishes notice in the Federal Register

of each petition that it receives, and

affords interested persons an

opportunity to comment on the petition.

At the close of the comment period,

NHTSA decides, on the basis of the

petition and any comments that it has

received, whether the vehicle is eligible

for importation. The agency then

publishes this decision in the Federal

Register.

LPC of New York, Inc. of

Ronkonkoma, New York (‘‘LPC’’)

(Registered Importer 96–100) has

petitioned NHTSA to decide whether

1986 Mazda RX–7 passenger cars are

eligible for importation into the United

States. The vehicle which LPC believes

is substantially similar is the 1986

Mazda RX–7 that was manufactured for

importation into, and sale in, the United

States and certified by its manufacturer

as conforming to all applicable Federal

motor vehicle safety standards.

The petitioner claims that it carefully

compared the non-U.S. certified 1986

Mazda RX–7 to its U.S. certified

counterpart, and found the two vehicles

to be substantially similar with respect

to compliance with most Federal motor

vehicle safety standards.

LPC submitted information with its

petition intended to demonstrate that

the non-U.S. certified 1986 Mazda RX–

7, as originally manufactured, conforms

to many Federal motor vehicle safety

standards in the same manner as its U.S.

certified counterpart, or is capable of

being readily altered to conform to those

standards.

Specifically, the petitioner claims that

the non-U.S. certified 1986 Mazda RX–

7 is identical to its U.S. certified

counterpart with respect to compliance

with Standards Nos. 102 Transmission

Shift Lever Sequence . . . ., 103

Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104

Windshield Wiping and Washing

Systems, 105 Hydraulic Brake Systems,

106 Brake Hoses, 109 New Pneumatic

Tires, 111 Rearview Mirrors, 112

Headlamp Concealment Devices, 113

Hood Latch Systems, 116 Brake Fluid,

124 Accelerator Control Systems, 201

Occupant Protection in Interior Impact,

202 Head Restraints, 203 Impact

Protection for the Driver From the

Steering Control System, 204 Steering

Control Rearward Displacement, 205

Glazing Materials, 206 Door Locks and

Door Retention Components, 207

Seating Systems, 209 Seat Belt

Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly

Anchorages, 212 Windshield Retention,

214 Side Impact Protection, 216 Roof

Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone

Intrusion, and 302 Flammability of

Interior Materials.

Petitioner states that the vehicle also

complies with the Bumper Standard

found in 49 CFR Part 581.

Petitioner also contends that the

vehicle is capable of being readily

altered to meet the following standards,

in the manner indicated:

Standard No. 101 Controls and

Displays: (a) inscription of the word

‘‘Brake’’ on the lens of the brake failure

indicator lamp; (b) replacement of the

speedometer/odometer with a U.S.-

model component.

Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective

Devices and Associated Equipment: (a)

installation of U.S.- model sealed

headlight assemblies; (b) installation of

U.S.- model rear sidemarker lights.

Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and

Rims: installation of a tire information

placard.

Standard No. 114 Theft Protection:

installation of a U.S.- model warning

buzzer relay and a warning buzzer in

the steering lock electrical circuit.

Standard No. 118 Power Window

Systems: rewiring of the power window

system so that the window transport is

inoperative when the ignition is

switched off.

Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash

Protection: installation of a seat belt

warning buzzer. Petitioner states that

the vehicle is equipped with U.S.-model

seat belt assemblies identical to those

found on its U.S.-certified counterpart.

Standard No. 301 Fuel System

Integrity: installation of a rollover valve

in the fuel tank vent line between the

fuel tank and the evaporative emissions

collection canister.

Additionally, the petitioner states that

a VIN plate will be installed in the

vehicle so that it can be read from

outside the left windshield pillar, and a

VIN reference label will be installed on

the edge of the door or latch post nearest

the driver to meet the requirements of

49 CFR Part 565.

Interested persons are invited to

submit comments on the petition

described above. Comments should refer

to the docket number and be submitted

to: Docket Section, National Highway

Traffic Safety Administration, Room

5109, 400 Seventh Street, S.W.,

Washington, DC 20590. It is requested

but not required that 10 copies be

submitted.

All comments received before the

close of business on the closing date

indicated above will be considered, and

will be available for examination Mazda

in the docket at the above address both

before and after that date. To the extent

possible, comments filed after the

closing date will also be considered.

Notice of final action on the petition

will be published in the Federal

Register pursuant to the authority

indicated below.

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and

(b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8; delegations of authority

at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

Issued on: January 3, 1997.

Marilynne Jacobs,

Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.

[FR Doc. 97–387 Filed 1–7–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P

[Docket No. 96–132; Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for

Decision That Nonconforming 1984

Nissan 300ZX Passenger Cars Are

Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition for

decision that nonconforming 1984

Nissan 300ZX passenger cars are eligible

for importation.

SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt

by the National Highway Traffic Safety

Administration (NHTSA) of a petition

for a decision that a 1984 Nissan 300ZX

that was not originally manufactured to

comply with all applicable Federal

motor vehicle safety standards is

eligible for importation into the United

States because (1) it is substantially

similar to a vehicle that was originally

manufactured for importation into and

sale in the United States and that was

certified by its manufacturer as

complying with the safety standards,

and (2) it is capable of being readily

altered to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments

on the petition is February 7, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to

the docket number and notice number,

and be submitted to: Docket Section,

Room 5109, National Highway Traffic

Safety Administration, 400 Seventh St.,

SW, Washington, DC 20590. [Docket

hours are from 9:30 am to 4 pm]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

George Entwistle, Office of Vehicle

Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–

5306).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a

motor vehicle that was not originally

manufactured to conform to all

applicable Federal motor vehicle safety

standards shall be refused admission

into the United States unless NHTSA