alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67925-67926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33879]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request for Review of a 
Revised and Expiring Information Collection: Form RI 95-4

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-103, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget a request for review of a revised & expiring information 
collection. RI 95-

[[Page 67926]]

4, Marital Information Required of Refund Applicants for Federal 
Employees Retirement System (FERS), is used by OPM to pay refunds of 
retirement contributions when the information is not included on the SF 
3106, Application for Refund for Retirement Deductions (FERS). To pay 
these benefits, all applicants for refund must provide information to 
OPM about their marital status and whether any spouse(s) or former 
spouse(s) have been informed of the proposed refund.
    Approximately 100 RI 95-4 forms will be completed annually. We 
estimate it takes approximately 30 minutes to complete the form. The 
annual burden is 50 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2b8bfb4b3a0a0bdbc92bda2bffcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b31363d3a292934351b342b36753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by January 29, 
1998.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

John C. Crawford, Chief, FERS Division, Retirement and Insurance 
Service, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 
3313, Washington, DC 20415
      and
Joseph Lackey, OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management & Budget, New Executive Office Building, 
NW, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Budget & Administrative Services Division, (202) 
606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-33879 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
INCOME STATEMENT AND CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS APPEARING ON PAGE 7 OF FORM 10-Q FOR SIX MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                   39,039,412
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  4,795,063
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                      11,520,387
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       703,023
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,057,885
<COMMON>                                     1,834,445
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    4,882,047
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                         12,228,585
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>              18,945,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                        19,500,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                           4,800,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>              12,812,808
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>               56,057,885
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                   29,785,997
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                         1,916,369
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  25,287,624
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                  27,203,993
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                      2,582,004
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             417,886
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>               2,999,890
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       940,460
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,059,430
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                5,535,272
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                       7,391,178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .98
        

</TABLE>
No. 10348.

#### I. Koblitz & Son *v.*Duffie et al.

Decided May 5, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Harry Koblitz*and *Messrs. Ford & Snyder,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Vessy, Davis & Manak,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
Ex101GAltr


Back to Form 8-K
Exhibit 10.1




	
			
	[Logo]
	GEORGIA DEPARTMENT
	 

	 
	OF COMMUNITY HEALTH


	 




	
			
	Nathan Deal, Governor
	 
	Clyde L. Reese Ill, Esq., Commissioner






2 Peachtree Street, NW I Atlanta, GA 30303-3159 I 404-656-4507 I www.dch.georgia.gov


	
			
	 
	March 3, 2014
	 






Ms. Kathy Ryland
State Chief Operating Officer
WellCare of Georgia
211 Perimeter Center Parkway, NE
Suite 800
Atlanta, GA 303446


Re: PPACA Health Insurer Fee


Dear Ms. Ryland:


Section 9010 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) and section 1406 of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (“HCERA”) of 2010 imposes an annual fee on qualifying health insurers such as WellCare. The annual fee is effective 2014 and is scheduled to increase each year thereafter. As you are aware, WellCare’s Medicaid premiums are funded by both the State of Georgia and the federal government. Accordingly, the Georgia Department of Community Health will fund its share of WellCare’s annual Health Insurer Fee.


Specifically, the Department of Community Health will reimburse WellCare the amount of the Health Insurer Fee, including an adjustment for the full impact of the non-deductibility of the Health Insurer Fee for Federal and State tax purposes, including income and excise taxes related to the Affordable Care Act Premium attributable to WellCare’s Georgia Families membership. The WellCare Adjusted Fee shall be determined based on the final notification of the Health Insurer Fee amount WellCare’s corporate office receives from the United States Internal Revenue Service. The Department will pay their share of WellCare’s Health Insurer Fee amount through the capitation payment process in a manner developed by the Department and acceptable to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”). The Department will complete its reconciliation within ninety (90) days of its receipt, from Well Care, of the final notice identifying the fee amount from the Internal Revenue Service and supporting documentation relevant to the amounts associated with the WellCare’s Georgia Families membership. Payment will be made as soon as administratively possible following calculation of the fee amount. As with all payments made by the Department, this proposed plan is contingent on the availability of State funds.


Should you have additional questions regarding this matter, please contact John Upchurch, Director of Reimbursement Services, at (404) 657-0229.




Health Information Technology | Healthcare Facility Regulation | Medical Assistance Plans | State Health Benefit Plan
	
			
	 
	Equal Opportunity Employer
	 



















	
			
	 
	Regards,


	 

	 
	/s/ Clyde L. Reese III
	 

	 
	Clyde L. Reese III, Esq.,
	 

	 
	Commissioner
	 








CLR/lrr




	
			
	CC:
	Jerry Dubberly, Chief, Medical Assistance Plans
	 

	 
	John Upchurch, Director, Reimbursement Services
	 


























































Health Information Technology | Healthcare Facility Regulation | Medical Assistance Plans | State Health Benefit Plan
	
			
	 
	Equal Opportunity Employer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-2 No. 333-112360, Form S-8 No. 333-112213, 333-71374,333-66993, 333-92525, 333-39065, 333-50292 and 333-50296) pertaining to the Registration Statement on Form S-2, dated February 24, 2004, 2003 Stock Plan, 2001 Stock Plan, 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1993 Stock Plan, 1995 Employee StockPurchase Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan of Adept Technology, Inc. of our report dated August 4, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Adept Technology, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended June 30, 2004. 

 

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

SanJose, California 

September 27, 2004
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Source Corporation (1st Source) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry E. Lentych,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:
 
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of 1st Source.
 
 
 
 By:
 
 
 /s/LARRY E.
LENTYCH
 Larry E.
Lentych
 Chief
Financial Officer
 October
24, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AER ENERGY
RESOURCES, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,761,268
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,198
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,957,891
<PP&E>                                       3,624,558
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,012,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,580,993
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          693,706
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    66,580,384
<OTHER-SE>                                 (64,980,597)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,580,993
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,946,970
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,592,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,486,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,486,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,486,829)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.14)


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00566-CV

David Fernea, Appellant

v.

Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-09-002195, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On July3, 2014, the parties filed their joint status report on abatement, requesting that

the abatement of this appeal continue until October 3, 2014, due to ongoing settlement negotiations. 

The request is granted, and the appeal will remain abated until further order of this Court. The

parties shall submit either a joint status report concerning the status of settlement negotiations or a

motion to dismiss the appeal on or before October 3, 2014.

_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Abated

Filed: July 10, 2014
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

###### **CERTIFICATION OF VERITAS DGC INC.**

###### ** **

I, Mark E. Baldwin, the Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.   Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC Inc.;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)               Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)              Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)               Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.   The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| June 1,  2005 |
|--------------------|
|               | /s/  MARK E. BALDWIN |   |
|               | Mark E. Baldwin |
|               | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
#### Anthony DAVIS, a minor, by and through his next friend and father, Gordon Davis and Gordon Davis, individually, Appellants, v. Moneda Key HOLMAN and H. R. Holman, Appellees.

No. 69-1070.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 16, 1970.

Leonard L. Levenstein, Miami, for appellants.

Dean, Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued in the circuit court for damages resulting from injuries to his eight year old son who was struck by an automobile owned by appellee-husband and operated by appellee-wife.

The trial judge, at the close of plaintiff’s case, directed the jury to enter a verdict in favor of the defendants. Appellants seek reversal of the final judgment entered pursuant to the directed verdict.

We have carefully reviewed the record and considered the briefs of counsel and have concluded that the trial judge was correct in directing a verdict for the defendants inasmuch as there was no evidence presented that would support the charges of negligence made against the defendant-driver. Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiffs shows, as a matter of law, that the appellee-driver was not negligent and that the negligence of the minor plaintiff was the proximate cause of his injuries. Midstate Hauling Co. v. Fowler, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 87; Nabelski v. Turner, Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 729; and Baro v. Wilson, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 843. Accordingly the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Pump Systems Matter Mission and Vision:

Pump Systems MatterTM (PSM) places a primary focus on pump systems education and outreach and addresses

energy savings and total cost of pump ownership.  

Vision:  

Pump Systems Matter initiative assists North American pump users gain a more competitive business advantage

through strategic, broad‐based energy management and pump system performance optimization.

Mission:  

To provide the marketplace with tools and collaborative opportunities to integrate pump system performance

optimization and efficient energy management practices into normal business operations.

Essential Elements:  

 Build awareness of the benefits of systems optimization and pump system life cycle cost at the

management, production and technical levels of companies throughout the supply chain.

 Assist the pump industry in building their capacity to deliver system optimization solutions.

 Partner with key groups such as, the energy efficiency community, utilities, engineering consulting firms,

pump system users, HI and other associations, and government agencies to strategically support

educating, encouraging and creating incentives for end users and trade partners to adopt systems

optimization products, services and practices.

Website:  www.PumpSystemsMatter.org
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-39865, 33-39866,333-45971, 333-91967 and 333-113059) of Hector Communications Corporation ofour report dated March 7, 2006 relating to the financial statements ofMidwest Wireless Holdings L.L.C., which appears in this Form 10-K.

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     |   |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota         |   |
| March 28, 2006            |   |

 

86

----
Exhibit 32.1







                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
J. Hinkaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ CHARLES J. HINKATY
----------------------
Charles J. Hinkaty
Chief Executive Officer
July 6, 2007
No. 10375.

#### Hutchins et al. *v.*Wiltsie.

Decided June 2, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hancock county.

*Mr. A. G. Fuller,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. William F. Chambers*and *Mr. C. V. Bish,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Si-iauck, Crew, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Harold FALGOUT v. ST. CHARLES SEWERAGE DIST. NO. 3 et al.

No. 61194.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: St. Charles Parish Sewerage District No. 3 et al., applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Charles. 351 So.2d 206.

Writ denied.
Exhibit 32





Certifications





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, of American General Finance Corporation as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of, Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|      | /s/                                               | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | 
|      |                                                   | Frederick W. Geissinger  | 
|      | President and Chief Executive Officer             |                         
|      | /s/                                               | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      |                                                   | Donald R. Breivogel, Jr. | 
|      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |                         
|Date: | May 11, 2007                                      |                          | 





35
No. 10275.

#### Carson *v.*Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co.

Decided April 28, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Hardin county.

*Mr. Phil. M. Crow,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Wm. P. Henderson,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Si-iauck, C. J., Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.