alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Melvin Dean FORD.

No. 61664.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: Melvin Dean Ford applying for supervisory and remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Frank A. Marullo, Jr., Judge of the Criminal District Court, for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 31st day of March, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
#### David NORTHERN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Respondent.

No. 70-757.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 17, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS • 1500 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W. • WASHINGTON, D.C.• 20220 • (202) 622-2960

FOR RELEASE AT 3 PM Contact: Jon Murchinson (202) 622-2960 

OCTOBER 28, 1996

TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET BORROWING 

ESTIMATES

The Treasury Department announced today that its net market borrowing for 

the October - December 1996 quarter is estimated to be $48 billion, with a cash 

balance of $30 billion on December 31. Treasury also announced that its net market 

borrowing for the January - March 1997 quarter is estimated to be in the range of 

$50 billion to $55 billion, with a cash balance of $20 billion on March 31, 1997.

In the quarterly announcement of its borrowing needs on July 29, 1996, 

Treasury estimated net market borrowing for the October - December quarter 

to be in a range of $50 billion to $55 billion, assuming a $30 billion cash 

balance on December 31.

Actual net market borrowing in the July - September quarter was $40.3 

billion, while the end-of-quarter cash balance was $44.2 billion. On July 29,

Treasury estimated net market borrowing for the July - September quarter to be $45 

billion, with a $40 billion cash balance on September 30. The combined $8.9 billion 

improvement was the result of higher than estimated receipts and lower than 

estimated outlays.

The regular quarterly press conference will be held at 1 pm on 

Wednesday, October 30, 1996.

RR-1346
For press releases, speeches, public schedules and official biographies, call our 24-hour fax line at 

(202) 622-2040
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00203

- CV

J OSEPH G ULLIKSEN

, Appellant

V

.

B EVERLY J O G ULLIKSEN A / K / A

B EVERLY J O R OSING

, Appellee §

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 367th Dis t rict Court

of Denton County ( 14

- 00440

- 367 )

May 6, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the ju d gment of the trial

court is reversed and judgment is rendered that Appellee Beverly Jo Gulliksen a/k/a

Bever ly Jo Rosing take nothin g on her petition

.

It is further ordered that appell ee Beverly Jo Gulliksen a/k/a Bever ly Jo Rosing

shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Brian Walker

Justice Brian Walker
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7724

JEROME BRANCH,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

MS. BADGETT, Head Nurse; MS. WHITE, RNC-A Nurse; EDWARD 

BOAKYE,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr. Senior

District Judge. (2:11-cv-00124-HCM-FBS)

Submitted: December 13, 2012 Decided: December 19, 2012

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, 

PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Branch appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Branch v. Badgett, No. 2:11-cv-00124-HCM-FBS (E.D. Va. 

Sept. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### MICHAEL CONSTRUCTION CO., etc., et al., Petitioners, v. Fred G. SMITH et al., Respondents.

No. 40925.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 28, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 244 So.2d 563.

CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, J., dissent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Standard Motor Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lawrence I. Sills, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Lawrence I. Sills
---------------------
Lawrence I. Sills
Chief Executive Officer
March 11, 2009


*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Standard Motor Products, Inc. and will be retained by Standard Motor
Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission on its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 AND ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K  I, Richard Banakus, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.   /s/: Richard Banakus Richard Banakus Interim President, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  May 10, 2010
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of
      the
      undersigned officers of The Female Health Company (the “Company”) certifies that
      the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form
      10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  December 21,
      2007


/s/
      O.B.
      Parrish


O.B.
      Parrish


Chief
      Executive Officer







Dated:  December 21,
      2007


/s/
      Donna
      Felch


Donna
      Felch


Chief
      Financial Officer







This
      certification is made solely for
      purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained
      therein, and not for any other purpose.
#### Shirley A. ZANOTELLI, Individually and Shirley A. Zanotelli, as Administratrix of the Estate of Alan Scott Zanotelli, Deceased, Appellant, v. SEARS ROEBUCK & COMPANY et al., Appellees.

No. 73-546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Thomas E. Kirkland, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers 333-148163, 333-132607 and 333-162513 on Form S-8 of NaturalNano, Inc. of our report, dated April 15, 2011, on the consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NaturalNano, Inc..  Our report, dated April 15, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.





/s/ Freed, Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, PC





Buffalo, NY


Dated:  April 15, 2011
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc.:

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-64191) on Form S-8 of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc. of our report
dated March 23, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Santa
Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and
cash flows and related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2000 which report appears in the December
31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Orange County, California
March 29, 2001
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY and Robert J. Schmidt, Appellants, v. Art A. MAGNUSON, Appellee.

No. 72-876.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 8, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1974.

*303Frederick J. Ward and William H. Davis, of Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, Orlando, for appellants.

T. G. LaGrone and Hartselle Baker, of LaGrone & Baker, Orlando, for appellee.

OWEN, Chief Judge.

Appellee sustained serious personal injury when the automobile in which he was a passenger was involved in a grade crossing collision with appellants’ train. Appellee’s suit, tried before a jury, culminated in a judgment in his favor.

 Appellants’ first three points are concerned with the affirmative defense of assumption of the risk. This defense requires actual knowledge and appreciation of the danger, and thereafter, with a reasonable opportunity to avoid it, a voluntary and deliberate exposure to such danger. Cleveland v. City of Miami, Fla.1972, 263 So.2d 573; Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480; Dana v. Bursey, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 845. The answer to the complaint did not adequately allege these essentials and thus, the court did not err in refusing to amend the pretrial order so as to include such defense as one of the issues to be tried (Point I). It necessarily follows that the court did not err in refusing appellants’ requested instructions on this issue (Points II and III).

 Appellants’ remaining two points (Points IV and V) both demonstrate error. After an examination of the entire case, we are satisfied such error was harmless. F.S. Section 59.041, F.S.A. Point IV is concerned with an evidentiary ruling. On rebuttal, plaintiff was permitted to place into evidence as substantive proof of the matter therein asserted, an extrajudicial written statement of a non-party witness. Such written statement was hearsay and the defendants’ objection on that ground should have been sustained. We conclude that this was harmless error because the content of the hearsay statement was (1) neither relevant nor material to any issue in the case, and (2) adequately explained and clarified by other testimony of the same witness offered by defendants on sur-rebuttal. Appellants’ Point V complains of the trial court’s denial *without a hearing*of their post-trial motion for directed verdict or for new trial. Although the court can grant a new trial *upon its own motion*(for which no hearing is required), nonetheless, when one of the parties to an adversary proceeding files a timely motion for new trial under Rule 1.530, RCP, 31 F.S.A. due process requires a hearing thereon after notice to all parties. Cf., Mayflower Inv. Co. v. Brill, 1939, 137 Fla. 287, 188 So. 205; State Dept. of Transportation v. Plunske, Fla.App.1972, 267 So.2d 337; Polland v. Visual Graphics Corp., Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 835; Prunty v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 448. We conclude that the error was harmless in view of the fact that the motion contained no matters *304which had not been argued previously to the court during the course of the trial.

Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Richard C. DAVIS, Respondent.

No. 41577.

The Florida Bar Nos. 6A65-11, 6A68-2 and 6A69-2.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 15, 1971.

*15Richard C. McFarlain, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, complainant.

B. J. Masterson, of Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg & Rogers, St. Petersburg, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to Article 11, Rule 11.08 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A., Respondent, Richard C. Davis, has filed with this Court a Petition for Leave to Resign.

Respondent contends he has been adequately disciplined since he has been incarcerated in a penal institution and has been suspended from the practice of law in Florida pending the outcome of criminal, contempt and disciplinary proceedings filed against him. He feels further hearings “can only have the effect of undermining confidence in the judiciary and the Bar and thus adversely affecting the administration of justice.”

In its Response to the Petition, The Florida Bar states:

> “Because of the widespread notoriety of this case, its seriousness and the difficulties arising from it, The Florida Bar opposes the Petition to Resign as not being in the public interest nor in the best interest of the courts or the legal profession.”

After considering the Petition, the Response, and the numerous charges against Respondent alleging misappropriation of trust funds, we have concluded that the granting of this Petition would adversely affect the purity of the courts and would hinder the administration of justice and the confidence of the public in the legal profession.

Accordingly, the Petition for Leave to Resign is denied and The Florida Bar is instructed to proceed with the final hearing in Respondent’s disciplinary proceeding.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements included in the A.T. Cross Company Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended April 1, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-1-2000
<CASH>                                          36,905
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,340
<INVENTORY>                                     19,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,436
<PP&E>                                         118,542
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,001
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,702
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,558
<SALES>                                         28,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,090
<CGS>                                           13,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    52
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,066)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,263)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,263)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.50)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CRYO-CELL International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended November 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mercedes Walton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jill M. Taymans, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mercedes WaltonMercedes WaltonChief Executive OfficerFebruary 28, 2007/s/ Jill M. TaymansJill M. TaymansVice President, Finance, Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 28, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4366]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 220


Third Party Collection Program

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Defense, DoD.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 30, 1997, the Department of Defense published a 
final rule (62 FR 4458) to remove 32 CFR part 220. The removal of part 
220 was made due to an administrative error and should not have been 
removed. This document is published to correct the removal and 
reinstate part 220.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This correction is effective January 30, 1997.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All previous publications and amendments to 
part 220 remain effective. The last amendment to part 220 was published 
on January 7, 1997 (62 FR 941) which amended Sec. 220.8(k)(2). No other 
adjustments or amendments or changes are effective as of February 19, 
1997.

PART 220--COLLECTION FROM THIRD PARTY PAYERS OF REASONABLE COSTS OF 
HEALTHCARE SERVICES

    For reasons set forth in the preamble, 32 CFR part 220 is 
reinstated as it appeared in the 32 CFR Chapter 1, July 1, 1996 
edition, and amended at 62 FR 941, January 7, 1997.

    Dated: February 19, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-4366 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11

                       ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS CORPORATION
               STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER SHARE
               FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, 2001, AND 2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       2002        2001        2000
                                                                    ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                                                                 <C>         <C>         <C>
BASIC:

Weighted average number of common shares                            7,207,155   7,128,889   7,098,728
                                                                    =========   =========   =========

DILUTED:

Weighted average number of common shares                            7,207,155   7,128,889   7,098,728
Dilutive effect of common stock equivalents:
   Stock options                                                      114,099           -           -
                                                                    ---------   ---------   ---------
Weighted average number of common equivalent shares
outstanding                                                         7,321,254   7,128,889   7,098,728
                                                                    =========   =========   =========
</TABLE>

                                       49