Public Document

UNTED STATES OF AMRICA

FEDERA TRE COMMSSION

OFFCE OF ADMINISTRTIVE LAW JUGES

ORlGINAL

Respondent.

)

)

)

) Docket No. 9327

)

)

)

)

In the Matter of

Polypore International, Inc.,

a corporation,

STIPULATION AN (PROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER

GOVERNNG DISCOVERY FROM

HOLLINGSWORm & VOSE COMPAN

WHEREAS, on December 31,2008, Respondent, Polypore International, Inc., served

on third-par Hollngsworth & Vose Company ("H&V") a subpoena duces tecum (the

"Subpoena"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. The Subpoena called for

numerous categories of highly-confidential, proprietary, trade secret and competitivelysensitive documents.

WHEREAS, on January 26,2009, Complaint Counsel served subpoenas for testimony

on three H&V employees. (A copy of each of those subpoenas are attached hereto as Exhibits

2,3 and 4). These subpoenas on H&V employees called for testimony relating to the

confidential, proprietary, trade secret and competitively-sensitive documents requested by

Respondent (the "H&V Highly Confidential Material").

WHEREAS, the disclosure of the H&V Highly Confidential Material to Respondent

would cause harm to H&V's competitive position.

WHEREAS, the Protective Order Governing Discovery Material dated October 23,

2008 and entered in this matter permits discovery from thrd parties to be disclosed, under

certain circumstances, to employees of the Respondent, and at any time to Respondent's inhouse Special CounseL. Since any disclosure to Respondent would compromise H&V's

competitive position, H& V has sought to prohibit the disclosure of its Highly Confdential

Material directly to Respondent, including to its in-house Special Counel, while permitting

disclosure to Respondent's outside counsel, experts and consultants.

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to stipulate to the proposed Protective Order

Governng Discovery from Hollngsworth & Vose Company (the "H&V Protective Order"),
attached hereto as Exhibit 5, providing for a "H&V Highly Confidential" designation for such

competitively-sensitive documents and testimony. Under the proposed H&V Protective Order,

documents or testimony designated "H&V Highly Confdential" may not be disclosed to any

officer, director, employee or representative of Respondent, except for any author or recipient

of the document or Respondent's outside counsel and consultants or experts retained by

Respondent for purposes of this matter; and

WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request the entry of the proposed Protective

Order Governing Discovery from Hollngsworth & V ose Company, attached hereto as Exhibit

5.

Date: February 3, 2009

By ¡(t~ Kathryn K. Conde

Jonathan D. Persky

NUTTER MCCLENNEN & FISH LLP

155 Seaport Boulevard

World Trade Center West

Boston, MA 02210

Tel: (617) 439-2000

Fax: (617) 310-9000

E-mail: kconde(lnutter.com

jpersky(lnutter. com

Attorneys for Hollngsworth & Vose Company

By 0-(J W~

Wiliam R. Rikard, JI.

Eric D. Welsh

PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP

Three Wachovia Center

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000

Charlotte, NC 28202

Tel: (704) 372-9000

Fax: (704) 334-4706

E-mail: willamrikard(lparkerpoe.com

ericwelsh(lparkerpoe. com

Attorneys for Respondent

-2-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 3, 2009, I filed via overnight delivery and electronic

mail delivery an original and two copies of the foregoing Stipulation and (Proposed) Protective

Order Governing Discovery from Hollngswort & V ose Company and that the electronic copy

is a true and correct copy of the paper original and that a paper copy with an original signature

is being fied with:

Donald S. Clark, Secretary

Office of the Secretary

Federal Trade Commssion

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Rm. H-135

Washington, DC 20580

secretary (lftc. gov

I hereby certify that on February 3, 2009, I caused to be served one copy via electronic

delivery and two copies via overnight mail delivery a copy of the foregoing Stipulation and

(Proposed) Protective Order Governing Discovery from Hollngsworth & V ose Company

upon:

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell

Administrative Law Judge

Federal Trade Commssion

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

oalj(lftc.gov

I hereby certify that on February 3, 2009, I caused to be served via electronic delivery

and first -class mail delivery a copy of the foregoing Stipulation and (Proposed) Protective

Order Governing Discovery from Hollingsworth & V ose Company upon:

Wiliam L. Rikard, JI.

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

wilamrikard(lparkerpoe. com

J. Robert Robertson, Esq.

Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

rrobertson(lftc. gov

Steven Dahm, Esq.

Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

sdahm(lftc. gov ~ l) IUnathan D. Persky

f~

-3-
--

'0
1':

'V SUBPOENA DUCES :TECUM

Issued Pursuant to Rule 3.34(b), 16 C.F.R. § 3.34(b)(1997)

1. TO

Hollingsworth & 'Vose Company

112 Washington Street

East Walpöle, MA 02032

2. FROM

UNTED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

This subpoena requires you to produce and permit inspe.ction and copying of designated books, documents (as

defined in Rule 3.34(b )), or tangible things - or to p~rmit inspection of premises - at the date and time specified in

Item 5, at the request of Counsel listed in Item 9, in the proceeding described in Item .6. .

3. PLACE OF PRODUCTION OR INSPECT/ON

Parker Poe Adams & BernStein, LLP

Three Wachovia Center

401 S. Tryon Street, Suite 3000

Charlotte ,NC 28202

4. MATERIAL WILL BE. PRODUCED TO

Pölypore International, Inc.

'5. DATE ANi) TIME OF P"ODUCTION.OR INSPECTION

January 15, .2009 at 10:00 AM

6. SUBJECT OF PROCEEDING

In the Matter of Polyp ore Interntional, Inc., Docket No. 9327

7. MATERIAL TO EiE PRODUCED

Documents identified. ;i'Itheattachedspectfications.

8. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

The Honorable D. Michael. Chappell

Federal Trade Commission

Washington, D.C. 20580

.

9.CQUNSEl REQU!;STING SUBPOENA

EricD. Welsh

704-335..9052

Counsel for Respondent

DATE ISSUEÖ SECRETA~ i.~

Octo.b.er 24,' 2'008

. GENERAL INSTRUGTIQNS

APPEARANCE

The delivery of this subpoena to you by any n:ethod

prescribed 'by the Commission's RUI'es of Pr~ctice is

legal service and may subject you to a penally

Impos~d by law for failure to comply.

MOTION TO LIMIT OR QUASH

Thè Commission's Rules of Practice require thatany

motion to limit or quash thls.subpoena be filed within

the earlier of 1 0 days after service or the time for

compliance. the original and ten copies of the petition

must baffled with the Secretary of the Federal Trade

Commission, accompanied by an affdavit of service of

the document upon couns.ellisted in Item 9, and upon .

all other parties prescribed by the Rules of Practice.

1M VEL EXPENSES

The Commission's Rules of Practice require that fees and

mileage be paid by the párt that requested your

appearance. You should presenfyour claim to counsel

listed in Item 9 for payment. If you are permanently or

temporarily living someWhere other than the address on

this subpoena and it would require excessive travel for

you to appear, you must get prior approval from coun~el listed in Item 9. . .

This subpoena does not require approval by OMB under

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.

FTC Form 70-B (rev. 1/97)
RETURN OF SERVICE

I hereby certfy that a duplicate original of the within

subpoena was duly served: (chec the melhod used)

C in person.

C by registered mall.

C . by leaving copy at principal offce or place of business, to wit:

- _.. -- - _. -.. - ~. - - - _. 0.' ~ ~_ ~ ~'.'.." __. _. __ _..0. _ _ _ _ _ ___

.-._-._---.------.._----.._----------------------------

-----._--_._--_._-------------..------------.._---------

_.___..___._M._.____ .____...______...__.___________._._

on the person named hereIn on:

-... _0"._ -'-----. ._'._. -"._ _ _....___...__.... ___.____~______ __...__.._______ _0_

(Month, day, and year)

_........-.----...._-----------.---.-----._---------------..._--..._--.----".-

(Name of pers making servce)

'" ----.. -. --.------. --f-------.- ------:---.~.---.:--__. .-..._0___. ._.".___ ___._. (OmClaltiUe) ",
SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ISSUED TO HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY

ON BEHAF OF POLYP ORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

FTC DOCKET NO. 9327

EXHIBIT A

I. REQUESTS

I. Documents suffcient to show the natue of any product in development or

improvement projects by H&V intended to compete with PE lead acid battery separators.

2. Documents sufficient to show the nature of any product in development or

improvement projects by any Third Par intended to compete -Vith PE lead acid battery

separators.

3. Documents suffcient to show H&V'S market share for battery separàtors

(including absorptive glass mat ("AGM")) in (a) Nort America and (b) the world.

4. Documents sufficient to show H&V's market share for AGM battery separators

by product end use, application or other classification used by H& V to record its market share

for the sale of battery separators. .

5. All documents relating to any actual or potential competitor ofH&V for AGM or

PE battery separators.

6. All documents relating to the level or state of competition in the battery separator

business prior to February 29, 2008. .

7. All documents relating to the level or state of competition in the battery separator

business after February 29, 2008.

8. All scientific or presentation papers, market studies or reports, discussing or

concerning the difference in pricing between PE and AGM separators or between batteries

containing such separators during the period of January 1,2003 to February 29,2008. .

9. All scientific or presentation papers, market studies or reports, discussing or

concerning the difference in pricing between PE and AGM separators or between batteries

containing such separators after February 29, 2008.

10. All documents relating to any communication between H&V and (a) Johnson

Controls, Inc. ("JCI"), (b) Exide Technologies ("Exide"), (c) EnerSys, (d) East Penn

Manufactuing Co., Inc. ("East Penn"), (e) Crown Battery Manufacturing Co. ("Crown"), (f)

Trojan Battery Co. ("Trojan"), (g) US Battery Manufactuing Co. ("US Battery"), (h) C&D

Technologies, Inc. ("C&D"), or (i) any other entity manufacturing lead acid batteries for sale in

North America, concerning: (i) any actual or potential contract or agreement between such

entity and H& V for the sale and purchase of battery separators, (ii) contemporaneous or future

PPAB 1495596vl
prices of battery separators, (iii) Polypore, (iv) ENTEK International LLC ("ENTEK") or (v)

Micrporous.

1 1. All documents constituting or reflecting any actual or potential contract or

agreement between H&V and (a) JCI, (b) Exide, (c) EnerSys, (d) East Penn, (e) Crown, (f)

Trojan, (g) US Battery, (h) C&D, or (i) any other entity manufacturing led acid batteries for sale

in Nort America, for the sale by H&V to suchentity of battery separators.

12. Documents suffcient to show the identity and nature of any product, either in

commercial production or under development, that competes or is expected to compete with any

AGM battery separator manufactued by H&V.

13. F or each H& V facility that has manufactued or is curently manufacturing

battery separators, documents suffcient to show the total anual volume of battery separators

manufactured at such facilty, including documents reflecting the amount of product sold by

dollar amount, units, square meters, and product lye or brand.

14. For all products responsive to Request No. 13, documents suffcient to show the

destination ofthe shipment of such product.

15. Documents sufficient to reflect the percentage of AGM battery separators sold by

H& V anually under contract with a duration in excess of one year as compared to total sales of

battery separators by H& V during the same period of time.

16. All documents relating to any potential entry of Microporous into the business of

manufacturing battery separators for sale to manufactuers of lead acid batteries for automotive

use.

17. All documents discussing or mentioning the actual or potential a.cquisition of

Microporous by Polypore.

18. All documents reflecting any analysis or comparison of performance

characteristics between AGM separators and PE-based or PE-rubber based separators.

19. All documents relating to the negotiation of the Cross Agency Agreement, entered

into as of March 23, 2001 by H&V and Polypore (the "Cross Agency Agreementj.

20. All documents relating to any amendment to or renewal of the Cross Agency

Agreement.

21. All documents relating to H&V's and/or Polypore's performance under the Cross

Agency Agreement, including without limitation, documents concerning joint marketing efforts

and sales calls.

22. All documents, including affidavits and statements, which H& V provided to the

FTC relating in any way to Polyp ore or Microporous.

2

PPAB 1495596vl
23. A copy of any trancript of any testimony, deposition or investigational hearing

èonducted in the Polypore Matter.

24. All documents evidencing, relating or referrng to communications between the

FTC and H& V relating in any way to Polypore or Microporous.

3

PPAB 1495596vl
II. INSTRUCTIONS AND DEFINITIONS

1. "Document" means the complete original or a true, correct and complete copy and any

non~identical copies of any written or graphic matter, no matter how produced, recorded, stored

or reproduced, including, but not limited to, any writing, letter, e-mail, envelope, telegram,

meeting minute, memorandum, statement, affidavit, declaration, book, record, survey, map,

study, handwrtten note, working paper, chart, index tabulation, graph, tape, data sheet, data

processing card, printout, microfim, index, computer readable media or other electronically

stored data, appointment book, diary, diary entr, calendar, desk pad, telephone message slip,

note of intervew or communication or any other data compilation in your possession, custody or

control, including all drafts or all such documents. "Document" also includes every writing,

drawing, graph, char, photograph, phono record, tape and other data compilations from which

information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by Hollngswort & Vose Company

though detection devices into reasonably usable form, and includes all drafts and all copies of

every such writing or record that contain any commentary, notes, or marking whatsoever not

appearing on the original.

2. "You" "your" and "H&V" for purposes of this request, means Hollngswort & Vose

Company or any of its parents, divisions, subdivisions, subsidiaries, affiliates, members, officers,

directors or managing agents, attorneys, employees, consultants, agents, as well as any

predecessors in interest, and all other persons acting or purorting to act on its behalf.

3. "Polypore" for the purposes of this request, means the Polypore International, Inc. and

any subsidiary or division thereof, including without limitation, Daramic, LLC, including their

respective employees.

4

PPAB 1495596vl
4. "Microporous" for the puroses of this request, means the Microporous Products, L.P.,

and any affiiate, subsidiar or division thereof, and their respective employees, offcers,.

directors, parers, attorneys and agents.

5. "FTC" means the Federal Trade Commission, and any of its directors, commissioners,

employees, consultants andagents.

6. "Polypore matter" means the investigation conducted by the FTC under Rule No. 081~

0131 and ths Administrative Proceeding, Docket No. 9327.

7. "Investigation" means any FTC investigation, whether formal or informal, public or nonpublic.

8. "Third Party" means any person; corporate entity; parnership; association; joint venture;

state, federal or local governental agency, authority or official; research or trade association; or

any other entity other than Hollngsworth & V ose Company or any of its subsidiaries or

affliates.

9. "Complaint" means the Complaint issued by the Federal Trade Commission to Polypore

International, Inc. in Docket No. 9327.

i O. "Relating to" means in whole or in par constituting, containing, concerning, discussing,

describing, analyzing, identifying or stating.

11. Unless otherwise stated, the relevant time period for these requests is January 1,2003 to

the present.

12. . The use of the singular shall be deemed to include the plural ïuid vice versa;

13. The terms "and" and "or" shall be interpreted liberally as conjunctive, disjunctive, or

both, depending on the context, so as to have their broadest meaning.

5

PPAB 1495596vl
14. Whenever necessary to bring within the scope of a request all documents that might

otherwise be construed to be outside its scope, the use of a verb in any tense shall be construed as

the use of the verb in all other tenses.

15. The term "all" includes any and vicé versa.

16. If you object to any par of a document request under the FTC Rules of Practice §3.37(b),

set forth the basis for your objection and respond to all pars of the document request to which

you do not object. No part of a document request shall be left unanswered merely because an

objection is interposed to another par of a document request.

17. All documents that respond, in whole or in part, to any portion of any document request

shall be produced in their entirety, including all attachments, enclosures, cover memoranda and

post-it notes.

i 8. If a document database is provided, provide an explanation of the definitions used and the

ficlds existing in such database.

19. If any privilege is claimed as a ground for not producing any document, provide for each

such document withheld on the basis of privilege all information required by FTC Rules of

Practice §3.38A

20. In the event that any responsive document was, but is no longer in your possession, state

what disposition was made of it, when, and the reason for such disposition. In the event that a

responsive document has been destroyed or retued to a Third Part, state (i) the reason for such

document's destrction or return, the date on which the document was destroyed or returned, and

the Third Party to whom the document was retued or on whose behalf the document was

destroyed; (ii) the name, title, and location thereof within Hollngswort & V ose Company of the

individual in whose possession, custody or control the document was when it was destroyed or

6

PPAB 1495596vl
retued; and (iii) the name; title, and location thereof within Hollngswort & V ose Company of

the individual who destroyed or retued the document.

21. These document requests are continuing in natue, up to and during the course of the

adjudicative hearng. All documents sought by these requests that you obtain or locate afer you

serve your responses must be immediately produced to counsel for Polyp ore by supplementary

response.

7

PPAB 1495596vl
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

In the Matter of

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ( .

Polypore International, Inc.,

a corporation.

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

PUBLIC DOCUMENT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certfy that on December 30,2008, I caused to be served one copy via electronic

mail delivery and two ~opies via overnight mail delivery of the foregoing Subpoena Duces

Tecum upon:

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell

Administrative Law Judge

Federàl Trade COITmission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

oalj (£ft6. gov

1 hereby certify that on' December 30, 2008, I caused to be served via first-class mail

delìvery and elèctronic mail delivery a copy of the foregoing Subpoena Duces Tecum upon:

1. Robert Robertson, Esq.

Federal Trade Commssion

600 Pennsylvana Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

ITa bertson($ftc. gov

PPAB IS18249vl

Steven Dah,Esq.

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

sdah(£ftc.gov

Adam C. Shearer

~~

ParkerPoe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Three Wachovia Center

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 300Q

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone: (704) 335,~9050

Facsimile: (704) 334-4706

SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM

Issued Pursuant to Rule 3.34(a)(1), 16 C.F.R. § 3.34(a)(1) (1997)

1. TO

Mr. Kevin Porter of Hollingsworth & Vose Co.

clo Kathryn K. Conde, Esq.

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

World Trade Center West

155 Seaport Boulevard

Boston, MA 02210-2604

2. FROM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

This subpoena requires you to appear and give testimony, at the date and time specified in Item 5, at the

request of Counsel listed in Item 8, in the proceeding described in Item 6.

3. PLACE OF HEARING

Bingham McCutchen LLP

One Federal Street

Boston, MA 02110

6. SUBJECT OF PROCEEDING

4. YOUR APPEARANCE WILL BE BEFORE

Stephen Antonio, Esq., (202) 326-2536

Joel Christie, Esq., (202) 326-3297

5. DATE AND TIME OF HEARING OR DEPOSITION

February 4,2009 at 11:00 a.m.

In the Matter of Polypore, International, Inc., Docket No. 9327

This subpoena calls for the testimony of the witness concerning the matters in the attached list of topics.

7. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

D. Michael Chapell

Federal Trade Commission

Washington, D.C. 20580

DATE ISSUED SECRETARY'S SIGNATURE

Cjj 0 !c7l~

8. COUNSEL REQUESTING SUBPOENA

J. Robert Robertson, Esq.

Complaint Counsel

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

(202) 326-2008

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

APPEARANCE

The delivery of this subpoena to you by any method

prescribed by the Commission's Rules of Practice is

legal service and may subject you to a penalty

imposed by law for failure to comply.

MOTION TO LIMIT OR QUASH

The Commission's Rules of Practice require that any

motion to limit or quash this subpoena be filed within

the earlier of 10 days after service or the time for

compliance. The original and ten copies of the petition

must be filed with the Secretary of the Federal Trade

Commission, accompanied by an affdavit of service of

the document upon counsel listed in Item 8, and upon

all other parties prescribed by the Rules of Practice.

FTC Form 7D-A (rev. 1/97)

TRAVEL EXPENSES

The Commission's Rules of Practice require that fees and

mileag.e be paid by the party that requested your

appearance. You should present your claim to Counsel

listed in Item 8 for payment. If you are permanently or

temporarily Hving somewhere other than the address on

this subpoena and it would requite excessive travel for

you to appear, you must get prior approval from Counsel

listed in 1tem 8.

This subpoena does not require approval by OMB under

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
RETURN OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a duplicate originai of the within

subpoena was dUly served: (checK 1he method used)

(' in person.

r by registered mail.

C by leaving copy at principal OffCe or place of business, to wit:

on the person named herein on:

(Morth. day. and year)

(Name of person makì¡;g saivies)

(Official title)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

tQlypore International, Inc.

a corporation.

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF KEVIN PORTER

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that pursuant to Rule 3.33(a) of the Federal Trade

Commission's Rules of Practice for Adjudicative Proceedings (16 C.F.R. §§ 3.33(a)), Complaint

Counsel wil take the deposition of Kevin Porter of HolHngsworth & Vose Company concerning

the attached list of topics. This deposition wil he conducted before a person .authorízed by law

to administer oaths. The testimony will he recorded by stenographic and/or video means. The

testimony wil be taken at the Bingham McCutchen LLP, One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110

on February 4, 2009 at 1 i :00 a.m.

Dated: January 23,2009 Respectfully submitted,

J. Robe edson

Steven A. Dahm

Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580
SUBPOENA AD TESTIFIG'ANDUMISSUED TO KEVIN PORTER

TOPICS ON WHICH WITNESS WILl, TESTIFY

(1) Discussions, meetings and documents between Daramc and H&V that lead up to the

signing of the Cross Agency Agreement, including but not limited to, the drafting and

signing of the letter of intent and the confidentiality agreement;

(2) The Cross Agency Agreement entered into by H&V and Daramìc on or about March 23,

2001, including any exhibits, addenda, amendments or modifications thereto;

(3) Competition in the manufacture and/or sale of PE, AGM and any related battery

separator products, including but not limited to, Daramic' s attempts to develop AGM

separators, or attempts by H&V to develop or enter PE separator production;

(4) Documents submitted by H&V in connection with the FTC's investigation of the

acquisition of Microporous Products, L.P. by Daramic LLC;

(5) Communication within H&V, or between H&V and Daramic, concerning the

manufacture and/or sale of PE battery separator products;

(6) The acquisition of Corydon from Exide by Daramic, including but not limited to the offer

that H&V submitted and any conversations or meeting H&V may have had with Bowles

Hollowell Conner or other companies who bid for Exide' s Corydon facilty; and

(7) H&V inquiry to purchase Microporous.
'.-,
SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM

Issued Pursuant to Rule 3.34(a)(1), 16 C.F.R.§ 3.34(a)(1) (1997)

1. TO

Mr. Bob Cullen of Hollingsworth & Vose Co.

c/o Kathryn K. Conde, Esq.

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

World Trade Center West

155 Seaport Boulevard

Boston, MA 02210-2604

2. FROM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

This subpoena requires you to appear and give testimony, at the date and time specified inltem5,at the

request of Counsel listed inltém 8, in the proceeding described in Item 6.

3. PLACE OF HEARING

Blngham MoCutchen LLP

One Federal Street

Boston, MA 02110

6. SUBJECT OF PROCEEDING

4. YOUR APPEARANCE WILL BE BEFORE

Stephen Antonio, Esq., (202) 326-.2536

Joel Christie, Esq., (202) 326-3297

5. DATE AND TIME OF HEARING OR DEPOSITION

February 5, 2009 at 10 a.m.

In the Matter of Polypore, International, Inc., Docket No. 9327

This subpoena calls for the testimony of the witness concerning the matters in the attached list of topics.

7. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

D. Michael Chapell

Federal Trade Commission

Washington, D.C. 20580

DATE ISSUED SECRETARY'S SIGNATURE

. rY.

8. COUNSEL REQUESTING SUBPOENA

J. Robert Robertson, Esq.

Complaint Counsel

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

(202) 326-2008

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

APPEARANCE

The delivery of this subpoena to you by any method

prescribed by the Commission's Rules of Practíce is

legal service and may subject you to a penalty

imposed by law for failure to comply.

MOTION TO LIMIT OR QUASH

The Commission's Rules of Practice require that any

motion to limit or quash this subpoena be fied within

the earlier of 10 days after service or the time for

compliance. The original and ten copies of the petition

must be filed with the Secretary of the Federal Trade

Commission, accompanied by an affidavit of service of

the document upon counsel listed in Item 8, and upon

aU other parties prescribed by the Rules of Practice.

FTC Form 70-A (rev. 1197)

TRAVEL EXPENSES

The Commission's Rules of Practice require that fees and

mileage be paid by the part that requested your

appearance. You should present your claim to Counsel

listed in Item 8 for payment. If you are permanently or

temporarily living somewhere other than the address on

this subpoena and it would require excessive travel for

you to appear, you must get prior approval from Counsèl

listed in Item 8.

i:his subpoena does not require approval by OMB under

the Paperwork ReductJon Act of 1980.
RETURN OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a duplicate original of the within

subpoena was duly served: (Check therr..thod used)

(~ in person.

r by registered mail.

î by leaving copy at principal offce or place of business, to wit:

on the person named herein on:

(Month, day. and year)

(Name of person making service)

(Otfcial\itie)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEnERAL TRAnE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

Polypore International, Inc.

a corporation.

NOTICE (iF DEPOSITION (iF BOB CUI,LEN

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that pursuant to Rule 3.33(a) of the Federal Trade

Commission's Rules of Practice for Adjudicative Proceedings (16 C.F.R. §§ 3.33(a)), Complaint

Counsel wìl take the deposition of Bob Cullen of Hollngsworth & Vose Company concerning

the attached list of topics. This deposition wil be conducted before a person authorized by law

tQ administer oaths. The testimony wì1 be recorded by stenographic and/or video means. The

testimony wìl be taken at the offices of Bingham McCutchen LLP, One Federal Street, Boston,

MA 02110 on February 5,2009 at 10 a.m.

Dated: Januar 23,2009 Respectfully submitted,

t;:'L-._._...... . /~:~

/" "

J. Robert Robertson

Steven A. Dahm

Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580
SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED TO BOB CULLEN

TOPICS ON WHICH WITNESS WILL TESTIFY

(1) Discussions, meetings and documents between Daramic and H&V that lead up to the

signing of the Cross Agency Agreement, including but not limited to, the drafting and

signin.g of the letter of intent and the confidentiality agreement;

(2) The Cross Agency Agreement entered into by H&V and DarainIc on or about March 23,

2001, including any exhibits, addenda, amendments or modifications thereto;

(3) Competition in the manufacture and/or sale of PE, AGM and any related battery

separator products, including but not limited to, Daramic's attempts to develop AGM

separators, or attempts by H&V to develop or enter PE separator production;

(4) Documents submitted by H&V in connection with the FlC's investigation of the

acquisition of Microporous Products, L.P. by Daramic LLC;

(5) Communication within H&V, or between H&V and Daramic, concerning the

manufacture and/or sale of PE battery separator plOducts;

(6) The acquisition of Corydon from Exide by Daramic, including but notIimited to the offer

that H&V submitted and any conversations or meeting H&V may have had with Bowles

Hollowell Conner or other companies who bid for Exide's Corydon facility; and

(7) H&V inquiry to purchase Microporous.

SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM

Issued Pursuant to Rule 3.34(a)(1), 16 C.F.R. § 3.34(a)(1) (1997)

1. TO

Mr. Tom White of Hollingsworth & Vose Co.

c/o Kathryn K. Conde, Esq.

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

World Trade Center West

155 Seaport Boulevard

Boston, MA 02210-2604

2. FROM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

This subpoena requires you to appear and give testimony, at the date and time specified in Item 5, at the

request of Counsel listed in Item 8, in the proceeding described in Item 6.

3. PLACE OF HEARING

Bingham McCutchen LLP

One Federal Street

Boston, MA 02110

6. SUBJECT OF PROCEEDING

4. YOUR APPEARANCE WILL BE BEFORE

Stephen Antonio, Esq., (202) 326-2536

Joel Christie, Esq., (202) 326-3297

5. DATE AND TIME OF HEARING OR DEPOSITION

February 6, 2009 at 10 a.m.

In the Matter of Polypore, International, Inc., Docket No. 9327

7. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE

This subpoena calls for the testimony of the witness concerning the matters in the attached list of topics.

D. Michael Chapell

Federal Trade Commission

Washington, D.C. 20580

DATE ISSUED SECRETARY'S SIGNATURE

8. COUNSEL REQUESTING SUBPOENA

J. Robert Robertson, Esq.

Complaint Counsel

Federal Trade Commission

600 Perinsylvariia Avenue, NW

WaShington, PC 20580

(202) 326-2008

APPEARANCE

The delivery of this subpoena to you by any method

prescribed by the Commission's Rules of Practice is

legal service and may subject you to a penalty

imposed by law for failure to comply.

MOTION TO LIMIT OR QUASH

The Commission's Rules of Practice require that any

motion to limit or quash this subpoena be filed within

the earlier of 10 days after service or the time for

compliance. The original and ten copies of the petition

must be filed with the Secretary of the Federal Trade

Commission, accompanied by an affidavit of service of

the document upon counsel listed in Item 8, and upon

all other parties prescribed by the Rules of Practice.

FTC Form 70-A (rev. 1/97)

TRAVEL EXPENSES

The Commission's Rules of Practice require that fees and

mileage be paid by the party that requested your

appearance. You should present your claim to Counsel

listed in Item 8 for payment If you are permanently or

temporarily living somewhere other than the address on

this subpoena and it would require excessive travel for

you to appear, you must get priör apprOval from Counsel

listed in Item 8.

This subpoena does not require approval by OMS under

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980.
RETURN OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a duplicate original ofthe within

subpoena was duly served: (CMèk the method used)

Î in person.

r by registered mail.

Î by leaving copy at princípal office or place of business, to wit:

on the person named herein on:

(Month, day, and year)

(Name of persoii rr.aking service)

(Ofllcial title)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THf~ .FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

)

)

) Docket No. 9327

)

)

)

Polypore International, Inc.

a corporation.

NOTICE OF' DEPOSITION OF' TOM WHITE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that pursuant to Rule 3.33(a) of the Federal Trade

Commission's Rules of Practice for Adjudicative Proceedings (16 C.F.R.§§ 3.33(a)), Complaint

Counsel wil take the deposition of Tom White concerning the attached list of topics. This

deposition win be conducted before a person authorized by law to administer oaths. The

testimony will be recorded by stenographic and/or video means. The testìmony wil be taken at

the offices of Bingham McCutchen ILP, One Federal Street, Boston, MA 02110 on Februar 6,

2009 at 10 a.m.

Dated: January 23, 2009 Respectful1y submitted,

""',..--..#~""''''_.,¥., /

J. Robert Robertson

Steven A. Dahm

Bureau of Competiton

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580
SUBPOENA AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED TO TOM WHITE

TOPICS ON WHICH WITNESS WILL TESTIFY

(1) Discussions, meetings and documents between Daramic andH&V that1ead up to the

signing of the Cross Agency Agreement, including but not limited to, the drafting and

signing of the letter of intent and the confidentiality agreement;

(2) The Cross Agency Agreement entered into by H& V and Daraíc on or about March 23,

2001, including any exhibits, addenda, amendments or modifications thereto;

(3) Competition in the manufacture and/or sale of PE, AGM and any related battery

separator products, including but not limited to, DaramÌC's attempts to develop AGM

separators, or attempts by H&V to develop or enter PE separator production.;

(4) Documents submitted by H&V in connection with the FTC's investigation of the

acquisition of Microporous Products, L.P. by Daramic ILC;

(5) Communication within H&V, or between H&V and Daramic, concerning the

manufacture and/or sale of PE battery separator products;

(6) The acquisition of Corydon from Exide by Daramic, including but not limited to the offer

that H& V submi tted and any conversations or meeting H&V may have had with Bowles

Hollowell Conner or other companies who bid for Exide's Corydon facilty; and

(7) H& V inquiry to purchase Microporous.
CERTi:i"'ICATE O:i' SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 26,2000, Iserved via electronic maíl and express maíl

the original and a copy of the foregoing Subpoenas Ad Testifcandum and Deposition Notices of

KevinPorter, Bob Cullen and Tom White with:

Kathryn K. Conde, Esq.

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

World Trade Center West

155 Seaport Boulevard

Boston, MA 02210-2604

I hereby certify that on January 26,2000, I served via electronic mail and express mail

two copies of the foregoing Subpoenas Ad Testifcandum and Deposition Notices of Kevin

Porter, Bob Cullen andToID White with:

Daniel S. Savnn, Esq.

Bingha.m McCutchen LLP

One Federal Street

Boston, MA 02110-1726

I hereby celtify that on January 23, 2000, I served via electronic mail and first class mail

two copies of the foregoing Subpoenas Ad Testificandum and Deposition Notices of Kevin

Porter, Bob Cullen and Tom White with:

WíIiam L. Rikard, Jr, Esq.

Eiic D. Welsh, Esq.

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

wi lliamri kürd 0ìparkerpoe.com

erìcwclsh (g)parkerpoe.com

j!- ~.."

.. ./ t .. Ìl: ~ ( i¡(l( .. q¿

UnclaD. Cunn ham .

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: (202) 326-2638

lcunningham0ìftc.gov

UNTED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFF1CE OF ADMINISTRTIVE LAW JUGES

In the Matter of

)

)

)

) Docket No. 9327

)

)

Polypore International, Inc.,

a corporation,

Respondent.

(pROPOSED) PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY

FROM HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY

On December 31,2008, Respondent, Polyp ore International, Inc., served on thirdparty Hollngsworth & Vose Company ("H&V") a subpoena duces tecum callng for the

production of highly-confidential, proprietary, trade secret and other competitively-sensitive

documents (the "H&V Highly Confidential Material"). Thereafter, on January 26, 2009,

Complaint Counsel served subpoenas on three H& V employees callng for testimony

concerning the H&V Highly Confidential Material. H&V objected to the disclosure of any of

its Highly Confidential Material to Respondent's officers, directors, employees or

representatives, including to its in-house or Special Counsel, on the ground that the disclosure

could harm the competitive position of H& V .

Complaint Counsel, Respondent and H&V have stipulated and agreed that in order to

protect against improper use and disclosure of H&V's competitively-sensitive information to

officers, directors, employees or representatives of Respondent, it is necessary to amend the

Protective Order Governing Discovery Material dated October 23 2008 (the "October 23

Protective Order") as to H&V to provide for an additional designation for highly confidential
discovery material that shall not be disclosed to Respondent, other than to its outside counsel

and its experts or consultants.

Based upon the Stipulation of the Parties, IT is HEREBY ORDERED that the October

23 Protective Order is amended as follows:

1. Discovery Material produced in this matter designated "H&V HIGHLY

CONFIDENTIAL/OUTSIDE COUNSEL AND EXPERTS ONLY/FTC Docket No. 9327"

shall be disclosed only to the categories of persons identified in sub-paragraphs 9(a) - 9(d),

9(t) and 9(k) of the October 23 Protective Order, to Complaint Counsel and to any officer,

director, employee or representative of H& V, and any witness or deponent who authored or

received the document in question; provided that the document reflects that the witness or

deponent authored or received the document or counsel for H& V stipulates or otherwise agrees

in writing that the witness or deponent was an author or recipient.

2. Any expert or consultant receiving H&V Highly Confidential Material shall be

provided with a copy of this Order and shall execute the acknowledgment in the form attached

hereto as Exhibit A;

3. All deposition transcripts shall be treated as Confidential Material in accordance

with the October 23 Protective Order, unless the testimony concerns a document marked H& V

Highly Confidential or unless counsel designates testimony as H& V Highly Confidential on the

record, in which case such testimony and any information contained in such testimony shall be

treated as H&V Highly Confidential, in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order

Governing Discovery from Hollingsworth & V ose Company.

-2-
4. Except as provided otherwise herein, all H&V Highly Confidential Material

shall be treated in accordance with the terms of the October 23 Protective Order governing

Confidential Material.

5. Except as provided otherwise herein, the provisions of the October 23 Protective

Order shall remain unaltered.

ORDERED:

D. Michael Chappell

Administrative Law Judge

Date: February _,2009

-3-
EXHIBIT A

UNTED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRA TIVE LAW JUGES

In the Matter of

)

)

) Docket No. 9327

)

)

)

Polypore International, Inc.,

a corporation.

DECLARATION CONCERNING PROTECTIVE

ORDER GOVERNING DISCOVERY FROM

HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY

I, , hereby declare and certify the following to be true:

1. (Statement of employment)

2. I have read the Protective Order Governing Discovery from Hollngsworth &

Vose Company ("H&V Protective Order") issued by the Commission on , 2009,

in connection with the above-captioned Matter. I understand the restrictions on my access to

and use of any H&V Highly Confidential Material (as that term is used in the H&V Protective

Order) in this Matter, and I agree to abide by the H&V Protective Order.

3. I unders1allhatihL-strilion~Rm)Le--LsiichRYlghL)'-unfidential

Material include:

a. that I wil use such H&V Highly Confidential Material only for the

purpose of preparing for this proceeding, and hearing(s) and any appeal of this

proceeding and for no other purpose;

b. that I wil not disclose such H&V Highly Confidential Material to

anyone, expect as permitted by the H&V Protective Order;

c. that I wil use, store and maintain the H&V Highly Confidential Material

in such a way as to ensure its continued protected status; and

-4-
d. that, upon the termination of my participation in this proceeding, I wil

promptly return all H&V Highly Confidential Materials and all notes, memoranda, or

other papers containing H&V Highly Confidential Material, to Complaint Counselor

Respondent's Outside Counsel as appropriate.

4. I understand that if I am receiving H& V Highly Confidential Material as an

Expert/Consultant, as that term is defined in the Commission's October 23, 2008 Protective

Order ("October 23 Order"), the restrictions on my use of H&V Highly Confidential Material

Material also include the duty and obligation to:

a. maintain such H&V Highly Confidential Material in separate locked

room(s) or locked cabinet(s) when such H&V Highly Confidential Material is not being

reviewed;

b. return such H&V Highly Confidential Material to Complaint Counselor

Respondent's Outside Counsel, as appropriate, upon the conclusion of my assignment

or retention, or upon conclusion of this Matter; and

c. use such H&V Highly Confidential Material and the information

contained therein solely for the purpose of rendering consulting services to a Party to

this Matter, including providing testimony in judicial or administrative proceedings

arising out of this Matter.

5. I am fully aware that, pursuant to Section 3.42(h) of the FTC Rules of Practice,

16 C.F.R. § 3.42(h), my failure to comply with the terms of the H&V Protective Order may

constitute contempt of the Commission and may subject me to sanctions.

Dated: , 2009

Full Name (typed or printed) Signature

1802876.2

-5-