alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7167 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7167

 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
 to add a pandemic as a potential cause of a fishery resource disaster.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2020

  Mr. Golden (for himself and Mr. Graves of Louisiana) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
 to add a pandemic as a potential cause of a fishery resource disaster.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITTLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pandemic Fishery Disaster Response 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSITION TO SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES.

    Section 312(a)(1) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1861a(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``; or'' and inserting 
        ``;'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking ``.'' and inserting ``; 
        or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(D) a pandemic, as such term is defined by the Secretary 
        of Health and Human Services.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Eclipse Surgical Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-05009) of our
report dated February 7, 1997, on our audits of the financial statements and
financial statement schedule of  Eclipse Surgical Technologies, Inc. as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the three years in the  period ended
December 31, 1996, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                        /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                        ----------------------------
                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Jose, California
March 13, 1997













                                          48
1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Un ited States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable H. David Young, United States Ma gistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3468

___________ Jack Casey Sisemore, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI - Forrest * City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 22, 2010 Filed: February 3, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Jack Sisemore appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. After careful de novo review, seeMitchell v. U.S. Parole Comm’n , 538 F.3d 948, 951 (8th Cir. 2008) (per cu riam), we conclude that dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(a)-2- (sentence to term of imprisonment comme nces on date defendant is received in custody awaiting transportation to, or arrives voluntarily to commence service of sentence at, official detention facility at wh ich sentence is to be served); United States v. Wilson , 503 U.S. 329, 331-35 (1992) (after distri ct court sentences federal offender, Attorney General, through Bureau of Prisons, has responsibility for administering sentence, including awarding credit for time served on federal sentence); Fegans v. United States , 506 F.3d 1101, 1103 (8th Cir. 2007) (18 U.S.C. § 3621(b) provides Bureau of Prisons with broad discretion to choose location of inmate’s imprisonment); Coloma v. Holder , 445 F.3d 1282, 1283-84 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (district court’s order that prison term should run c oncurrently with prison term already being served did not mean the two sentences ha d the same starting date; federal sentence cannot commence prior to date it is pr onounced, even if made concurrent with sentence already being served). Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 27, 2016














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---










Item 2.02    Results of Operations and Financial Condition





Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (the "Company") has reported its results of operations for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016 , as described in Company's press release dated July 27, 2016 , a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference.








Item 9.01.         Financial Statements and Exhibits





Exhibit No.Description99.1Press release issued by the Registrant dated July 27, 2016.





SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:July 27, 2016By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
##### 



STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
AND
BONUS AGREEMENT
 THIS STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT AND BONUS
AGREEMENT
 WHEREAS, Schedule A Schedule A
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS, Schedule A Schedule A.
 WHEREAS, Schedule A, Schedule A
 NOW THEREFORE,
 1. Increased
Exercise Price . Schedule A Schedule A.
 2. Bonus . Schedule A




---



##### 



3. Entire Agreement .
 4. Continuation
of Option Agreements .
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 CYBERONICS, INC./s/ John A. RiccardiBy: John A. RiccardiTITLE: Vice President,
FinanceOPTIONEEBy: Richard L. Rudolph,
M.D.




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A
 Number ofUnexercisedOption Shares
    
    Applicable
    
    Increased
    
    Aggregate
    
    PotentialExercise Price
    
    Which Vest After
    
    Measurement
    
    Exercise Price
    
    Increase in
    
    Retention BonusName
    
    Plan
    
    Grant Date
    
    Per Share
    
    12/31/04
    
    Date
    
    Per Share*
    
    Exercise Price
    
    **Rudolph, Richard
    
    1997 Plan
    
    
    06/15/04
    
    
    $
    19.58
    
    
    
    9,000
    
    
    
    06/17/04
    
    
    $
    15.23
    
    
    $
    137,070.00
    
    
    $
    137,070.00Rudolph, Richard
    
    1997 Plan
    
    
    01/24/02
    
    
    $
    12.45
    
    
    
    10,417
    
    
    
    02/12/02
    
    
    $
    2.06
    
    
    $
    21,459.02
    
    
    $
    21,459.02Total
    
    $
    158,529.02
EXHIBIT 21

 

|   | SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY |
|--------|-----------------------------|

 

| 1. | Air Travel Services, Inc., a Tennessee corporation |
|----|----------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | DFI, Inc., a Tennessee corporation |
|----|------------------------------------|

 

| 3. | O'Charley's Finance Company, Inc., a Tennessee corporation |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 4. | O'Charley's Management Company, Inc., a Tennessee corporation |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 5. | O'Charley's Restaurant Properties, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 6. | O'Charley's Service Company, Inc., a Tennessee corporation |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 7. | O'Charley's Sports Bar, Inc., an Alabama corporation |
|----|------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 8. | OCI, Inc., a Delaware corporation |
|----|-----------------------------------|

 

| 9. | OPI, Inc., a Colorado corporation |
|----|-----------------------------------|

 

| 10. | SRLS LLC 5001, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

| 11. | SRLS LLC 5002, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

| 12. | SRLS LLC 5003, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

| 13. | SRLS LLC 5004, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

| 14. | SRLS LLC 5005, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

| 15. | SRLS LLC 5006, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

| 16. | Stoney River Legendary Management, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 17. | Stoney River, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 18. | Stoney River Management Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 19. | 99 Commissary, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 20. | 99 Restaurants, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 21. | 99 Restaurants of Boston, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 22. | 99 Restaurants of Massachusetts, a Massachusetts Business Trust |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 23. | 99 Restaurants of Vermont, LLC |
|-----|--------------------------------|

 

| 24. | 99 West, Inc. |
|-----|---------------|
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31166

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID CUNNINGHAM,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SCHLUMBERGER WELL SERVICES, 

A DIVISION OF SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY 

CORPORATION; DIAMOND OFFSHORE (USA), INC., 

DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING SERVICES, INC.; 

HARDY OIL & GAS USA, INC.; 

HALLIBURTON COMPANY; JAMES E. GUIDRY; 

TONY VOVERS; AND MIKE ADAMS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1577

- - - - - - - - - -

May 27, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIA M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Cunningham argues that the district court erred in

denying his motion to remand in his Jones Act action. The

district court held that Cunningham could not possibly establish

seaman status. Cunningham also appeals the granting of summary
No. 96-31166

- 2 -

** Also dismissed on the motion for summary judgment were

Tony Vovers and Mike Adam, incorrectly identified as Mike Adams. 

Cunningham did not appeal the dismissal of these claims. They

are therefore waived on appeal. Cinel v. Connick, 15 F.3d 1338,

1345 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 868 (1994).

judgment in favor of Schlumberger Well Services.** Schlumberger

argued that it was entitled to summary judgment given the

district court’s ruling on the motion to remand that Cunningham

could not establish seaman status. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs on appeal and

AFFIRM the district court’s orders denying the motion to remand

and granting the motion for summary judgment in favor of

Schlumberger Well Services for essentially the same reasons set

forth by the district court. Cunningham v. Schlumberger Well

Serv., a Div. of Schlumberger Tech. Corp.; Diamond Offshore

(USA), Inc., Diamond Offshore Drilling Serv., Inc.; Hardy Oil &

Gas USA, Inc.; Haliburton Co.; James E. Guidry; Tony Vovers; and

Mike Adams, No. 96-31166 (W.D. La. Sept, 27 1996; Oct. 11, 1996).

AFFIRMED
# **Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, R. JamesKelly, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the“Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

•                  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended May 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

•                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: July 1, 2005                         |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                       |   |
|                                       |   |
| /s/ R. James Kelly                         |   |   |
| R. James Kelly                             |   |
| Vice Chairman and Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)              |   |
|                                            |        |  |

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Family Dollar Stores,Inc. and will be retained by Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-5019]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service


Notice of Receipt of Application for Endangered Species Permit

    The following applicant has applied for a permit to conduct certain 
activities with endangered species. This notice is provided pursuant to 
Section 10(c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.):
    Applicant: Roy S. DeLotelle, DeLotelle and Guthrie, Inc., 
Gainesville, Florida, PRT-825431.
    The applicant requests a permit to take (capture and harass for 
banding, and translocation) the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker, 
Picoides borealis, throughout the species range in North Carolina, 
South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, 
Tennessee, Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, Virginia, and Missouri for the 
purpose of enhancement of survival of the species.
    Written data or comments on these applications should be submitted 
to: Regional Permit Biologist, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 
Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345. All data and 
comments must be received by March 31, 1997.
    Documents and other information submitted with these applications 
are available for review, subject to the requirements of the Privacy 
Act and Freedom of Information Act, by any party who submits a written 
request for a copy of such documents to the following office within 30 
days of the date of publication of this notice: U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Suite 200, Atlanta, Georgia 30345 
(Attn: David Dell, Permit Biologist). Telephone: 404/679-7313; Fax: 
404/679-7081.

    Dated: February 20, 1997.
Noreen K. Clough,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-5019 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
Abatement Order filed April 2, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00160-CV

____________

MISHA FERGUSON, Appellant

V.

THE ENCLAVE AT COPPERFIELD, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1057001

ABATEMENT ORDER

On February 20, 2015, appellant filed a notice of appeal from a judgment 

signed January 21, 2015. On March 12, 2015, appellant filed a docketing statement 

and an affidavit of indigence in this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h). When the 

affidavit of indigence is filed with the appellate court, the appellate court clerk 

must send a copy of the affidavit to the trial court clerk and court reporter and 

include a notice stating the deadline for filing a contest to the affidavit. Tex. R. 

App. P. 20.1(d)(2). Accordingly, on March 16, 2015, the clerk of this court sent 

appellant’s affidavit of indigence to appellee, the trial court clerk, and the court 

reporter, and notified them that any contest was required to be filed within 10 days. 
See id. On March 26, 2015, appellee filed a contest to appellant’s affidavit. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 provides that the appellate court 

may refer a contest of indigency to the trial court with instructions to hear evidence 

and grant the appropriate relief. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(h)(4). Accordingly, we issue 

the following order:

We ORDER the trial court to hold a hearing on the contest to appellant’s 

affidavit of indigence within the time prescribed in Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 20.1(i)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(i)(2) (requiring the hearing within 

10 days of the receipt of referred contest); 20.1(i)(3) (permitting one 20-day 

extension of time to conduct the hearing). The trial court’s order ruling on the 

contest must be signed within the period set for the hearing. See Tex. R. App. P. 

20.1(i)(4). 

The court reporter shall file a reporter=s record from the hearing on the 

contest to appellant=s claim of indigence, including any exhibits admitted at the 

hearing. The trial court’s order and any written findings on whether appellant is 

entitled to proceed without the advance payment of costs shall be included in a 

supplemental clerk’s record filed with the clerk of this court. These indigence 

records shall be filed on or before 45 days from the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

the supplemental records ordered herein have been filed. The court also will 

consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the 

court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
               IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                             4,608
<SECURITIES>                      30,901
<RECEIVABLES>                     34,674
<ALLOWANCES>                       3,272
<INVENTORY>                       13,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  55,109
<PP&E>                            12,140
<DEPRECIATION>                     5,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    90,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             14,503
<BONDS>                                0
<COMMON>                              87
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                        75,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      90,060
<SALES>                           79,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  79,177
<CGS>                             38,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     69,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   10,186
<INCOME-TAX>                       3,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                6,862
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                       6,862
<EPS-BASIC>                       0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.75


</TABLE>
254 La. 861

#### E. E. RABALAIS & SON, INC. v. UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 50176.

Supremo Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: United Bonding Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Avoyelles. 226 So.2d 528.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error in the judgment complained of.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William MALMAY.

No. 61603.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: William Malmay, applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and review. Parish of Sabine.

Writ denied.
#### James HAMPTON, Petitioner, v. Edward J. STACK, etc., Respondent.

No. 73-1140.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 17, 1973.

Habeas Corpus denied.