alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
23.1







Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board
of Directors


Cyberonics,
Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-125401, 333-108281, 333-56694 and 333-66691) on Forms S-8 of
Cyberonics, Inc. of our reports dated June 24, 2008, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Cyberonics, Inc. as of April 25, 2008 and April
27, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’
equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the 52
weeks ended April 25, 2008, April 27, 2007, and April 28, 2006, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 25, 2008,
which reports appear in the April 25, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of
Cyberonics, Inc.




Our audit
report on the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory
paragraph that states that, effective April 29, 2006, the Company changed its
method of accounting for share-based payments.







/s/
      KPMG LLP


Houston,
Texas


June 24,
2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: 97-021]


Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review, Comment 
Request

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

SUMMARY: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has 
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) the following 
proposal for the collection of information under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by March 28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to Mr. Bill Comer, National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, Code QS, Washington, DC 20546-
0001. All comments will become a matter of public record and will be 
summarized in NASA's request for OMB approval.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Marie K. Tynan, Office of the Chief Information Officer, (202) 358-
1371.
    Title: NASA Safety Reporting System (NSRS).
    Need and Uses: The NSRS form may be used by NASA employees, NASA 
contractor employees, and others for voluntary and confidential 
reporting to an independent agent any safety concerns or hazards 
pertaining to any NASA program or project.
    Affected Public: Federal Government, Business or other for-profit, 
Not-for-profit institutions, State, Local or Tribal Government, 
Individuals or households.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 75.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Estimated Annual Responses: 19.
    Estimated Hours Per Request: .25.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 19.
    Frequency of Report: As required.

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
Donald J. Andreotta,
Deputy Chief Information Officer (Operations), Office of the 
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-4653 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-31091 Summary Calendar
TIMOTHY HUGH QUEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant

v. PARISH OF CALCASIEU; TONY MANCUSO; VIC SALVADOR; H. GREGORY TETE, Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CV-1303
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Timothy Hugh Queen, Louisiana prisoner # 54443, filed the instant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights suit to seek redress for an alleged denial of his right of

access to courts. The district court dismissed his suit as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon wh i c h r elief could be granted, and Queen appeals that di s m i s sal. We conduct a de novo review of the district court’s decision

. Se e Green v. Atkinson , 623 F.3d 278, 2 8 0 ( 5 th Cir. 2010). Our analysis of Queen’s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 26 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-31091 Document: 00511900254 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2012No. 11-31091

arguments, the record and pertinent authority shows no error in connection with the district court’s judgment. One wishing to raise a viable § 1983 claim must allege that a state actor violated his Constitutional rights. Cornish v. Corr. Servs. Corp. , 402 F.3d 545, 549 (5th Ci r . 2 0 0 5 ). The right of access to courts “guarantees no particular methodology but rather the conferral of a capability—the capability of bringing contemplated challenges to sentences or con di tions of confinement before the courts.” Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 356 (1996). Q u e e n c o mplains that the defendants’ actions hampered his ability to brin g excessive force claims unrelated to his sentence or the conditions of his confinement. Even if his ability to bring these claims was impeded, this is but “one of the incide n t al (and perfectly con s titutional) consequences of conviction and incarceration.” Id. at 355. Consequently, Queen failed to state a nonfrivolous access to courts claim upon which relief could be granted, and he has not shown that the district court erred by dismissing his suit. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-31091 Document: 00511900254 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2012
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7358

WILLIAM WASHINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE L. RUSHTON; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (0:05-cv-02394-GRA) Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 12, 2007 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Washington, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Washington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                       4,627,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,551,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 85,902,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           104,688,000
<PP&E>                                     132,040,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              23,334,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             222,361,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       55,669,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    94,318,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,436,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               222,361,000
<SALES>                                    294,916,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           294,916,000
<CGS>                                      203,239,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              203,239,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            95,031,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,419,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,773,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,733,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,040,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,040,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)


</TABLE>
#### GRANT-SHOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., and Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Tommie MOORE, Appellee.

No. 72-679.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,456
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,345
<PP&E>                                          21,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,772
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,903
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           540
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,772
<SALES>                                         97,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,265
<CGS>                                           40,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   90,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,594
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,292
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,275
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,061
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,214
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
#### CHRIS McGUIRE CINEMAS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Alex WEINSTOCK and R. P. Dawson, Appellees.

No. 70-1185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM. .

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 28, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00083

- CV

Daniel ROUNDTREE

, Appellant

v.

Chandravadan BHAKTA

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CV04583

Honorable J Frank Davis , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by June 21 , 2021. On June 28, 2021 , we sent appellant a notice that his brief had not been timely filed and requested an explanation from appellant by July 8 , 2021

. Appellant has not filed a brief, motion for extension or time, or explanation. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file , within fifteen (15) days of the date of this order, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) his failure to timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if an appellant fails to comply with a court order).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of July, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 40146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15733]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.

ACTION: Notice of one AHRQ Subcommittee Meetings by Virtual Review.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The subcommittee listed below is part of AHRQ's Health 
Services Research Initial Review Group Committee. Grant applications 
are to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. This meeting will be 
closed to the public in accordance with 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 10(d), 
5 U.S.C. section 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. section 552b(c)(6).
    Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Research Training Virtual Review.
    Date: July 11, 2013 (Open from 9:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on July 11 
and closed for remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, John Eisenberg 
Building, 540 Gaither Road, OEREP Conference Room, Rockville, MD 20850.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (To obtain a roster of members, agenda 
or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting.)
    Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, Office of 
Extramural Research Education and Priority Populations, AHRQ, 540 
Gaither Road, Suite 2000, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Telephone (301) 
427-1554.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with section 10 (a)(2) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2), AHRQ announces 
meetings of the scientific peer review groups listed above, which are 
subcommittees of AHRQ's Health Services Research Initial Review Group 
Committee. The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in 5 U.S.C. App. 2 section 
10(d), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Agenda items for these 
meeting are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: June 20, 2013.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-15733 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
256 La. 907

#### CITY OF BATON ROUGE v. Eddie WATSON.

No. 50928.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1970.

In re: City of Baton Rouge applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. The applicant’s remedy, if any, is by an appeal.
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATIONS


I, Joseph Sinicropi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date: November 14, 2007





                                                 /S/ JOSEPH SINICROPI
                                                 --------------------
                                                     Joseph Sinicropi
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Date(s) 

Month/Day/Year 

Start Time End Time

 am / pm am / pm 

 am / pm am / pm 

 am / pm am / pm 

 am / pm am / pm 

US Environmental Protection Agency Lead-Based Paint Activities and Renovation

Important: The training program manager may complete this sample form or similar form when notifying the EPA. Consult the 

Instructions for Notifying the EPA of Lead-Based Paint Abatement Activities and Renovation Courses when preparing training 

notification. Please type or print responses in black or blue ink only.

A. Type of Notification

(Choose one)

B. Description of Training

Course Discipline: Course Type: Language Presented:

(Choose one) (Choose one) (Choose one)

 Original Updated Cancellation

 Worker

 Supervisor

 Inspector

 Risk Assessor

 Project Designer

 Renovator

 Dust Sampling

 Initial

 Refresher

 English

 Spanish

 Other_______

Technician

Principal Instructor:____________________________________________________________________________________

Training Location Name (if applicable):_____________________________________________________________________

Training Location Address:______________________________________________________________________________

 ______________________________________________________________________________

Training Location Phone Number:_______________________________

C. Training Program

Name:________________________________________ Accreditation Number:_______________________________

Address:_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Phone Number:_______________________________

D. Training Managers Information (Please note that this form is incomplete without a signature)

I hereby attest and affirm that the information included on this notification form is true and accurate to the best of my belief and 

knowledge. I acknowledge that any approval authorized pursuant to this notification will be subject to revocation if issuance 

was based on incorrect or inadequate information that materially affected the decision to issue the approval.

Name_____________________________ Signature__________________________ Date Signed_________________

For information on EPA and other lead programs, see the web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/lead 

Street Address

City State Zip Code

Street Address City State Zip Code
================================================================================

EXHIBIT  32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Semper Resources Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, William J.
Reilly, Chief Accounting/Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ William J. Reilly
-----------------------------------------
William J. Reilly
Chief Financial/Accounting Officer






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------