alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4360-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2018-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Ohio (FEMA-4360-DR), dated April 17, 2018, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued May 25, 2018.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency                               ( print page 26496)                            Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Ohio is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 17, 2018.

Coshocton, Harrison, Jefferson, and Morgan Counties for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Brock Long,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2018-12247 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Jack ENRIGHT v. Allen MICHELL.

No. 38216.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
**Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do herebycertify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: February 14, 2007              /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer
Agenda June 19, 2013

9:00 Panel 1

The marketing of alloy products containing precious metals in amounts below 

the Jewelry Guides’ minimum thresholds. What guidance should be provided to 

advise sellers on how to describe these products non-deceptively? 

Ewa M. Abrams

Tiffany & Co.

Lisa Brooks-Pike

Jewelers Ethics Association

Cecilia L. Gardner

Jewelers Vigilance Committee

Robert Herskovits

Brilliant Jewelers / MJJ Inc.

Susan M. Kelly

QVC

Stuart Lee

Sterling Jewelers Inc.

Ajit Menon

United Precious Metal Refining, 

 Inc.

Charles A. Wagner III

Jewelry Television

10:30 Break
10:45 Panel 2

Surface-layer applications of precious metals on jewelry products. Is it necessary 

to amend the terminology used in the Jewelry Guides or provide additional 

guidance to prevent consumer deception?

Michael A. Akkaoui

Tanury Industries

Valerie J. Falen

Sterling Jewelers Inc.

Cecilia L. Gardner

Jewelers Vigilance Committee

Mark Hanna

Richline Group, Inc.

Susan M. Kelly

QVC

Pamela S. Mortensen

jcpenney

Dee Marino

TSI Holding Company

Brian Clapprood

LeachGarner Company 

12:15 Concluding remarks

Federal Trade Commission | ftc.gov
EXHIBIT 99(ii)


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officers certify , pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


                                       HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                       /s/ TERRENCE S. MCGRATH
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Terrence S. McGrath
                                       Chief Operating Officer
                                       November 14, 2002
#### Jack ENRIGHT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-602.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Evelyn A. LARNED, Appellant, v. Cortland K. LARNED, Appellee.

No. 72-971.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 4, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
6/19/2014

PEI Calculator Updates from v11 to v12

The following are updates that DOE has implemented in the PEI calculator in the new version 12:

Substantive:

1. Removed variable load (VL) calculations for pumps sold with controls for simplicity, clarity, and

to enable early issuance of this calculator.  Thus, this calculator only calculates the PEI Constant

Load (PEICL) for pumps sold as bare pumps and pumps sold with constant speed motors.  The

PEIVL calculator will be issued as soon as possible.  

2. Updated minimally compliant motor efficiency tables from 10 CFR 431.25 to reflect newly

published DOE motor standards and ensured a conservative value is assumed for all hp bins for

the PERSTD motor and for the motor paired with a bare pump.  

3. Added minimum efficiency table for submersible motors.

4. Updated C‐Values  

a. based on aggregated HI and DOE data

b. revised for RS‐V

c. to reflect more PEI levels between PEI10 and PEI40

i. PEI 10, 25, 30, 35, 40, and 55 are included

d. Note these C‐values are not yet “exact,” as the analytical team will have to iterate to

determine the exact PEI25 C‐values.  However, they should be close.  

5. Added tabs to enter tested wire‐to‐water input power data and calculate PEI for pumps sold

with motors.

6. Implemented new motor loss curve equation, including slightly different coefficients based on:

a. ensuring the curves are conservative

b. using newly available data provided by NEMA

c. updating motor losses for the minimally compliant pumps at each PER level.

7. Converted the equation for determining pump efficiency for a pump minimally compliant with

DOE standards to US units.

8. Added cells to convert all data to nominal speeds of 1800 and 3600 (from the data entered at

the rated speed) for calculations.

Editorial

1. Changed nomenclature to PEI for Index and PER for numerator or denominator value

2. Increased number of rows on each tab to a higher number (1000)
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 21-0170

IN THE MATTER OF:

R.J.H.,

A Youth in Need of Care.

___________________________________________________

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

___________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s first motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant-Mother is granted an 

extension of time until July 29, 2021, to prepare, serve, and file her 

Opening Brief. 

No further extensions will be granted. 

Signed and dated as indicated below. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 14 2021

06/14/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0170
#### Kenneth R. COMPTON v. Ivy Marie BERTAUT.

No. 61056.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Ivy Marie Bertaut applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson.

Writ denied.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000504

17-MAY-2017

08:32 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED  BALANCE  SHEETS,  STATEMENTS  OF INCOME,  STATEMENT  OF
STOCKHOLDER'S  EQUITY AND  STATEMENT  OF CASH FLOWS FROM FORM 10Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 29, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                               1,520
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       70,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4,686
<INVENTORY>                                         51,994
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   122,154
<PP&E>                                              72,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                      17,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     292,240 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              109,015
<BONDS>                                             92,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          42,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       292,240
<SALES>                                            264,378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   265,973
<CGS>                                              237,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      259,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (533)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       375
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,937
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,415
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,522
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,522
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### COUNTY OF VOLUSIA, Appellant, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH SHORES, a municipality under the Laws of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. HH-258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 31, 1978.

*933Warren 0. Tiller and William K. Howell, Jr., DeLand, Sam Spector and Guyte P. McCord, III, of Spector & Tunnicliff, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Leon G. van Wert of van Wert, Heebner & Kennedy, S. LaRue Williams of Kinsey, Vincent, Pyle & Williams, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Volusia County’s charter being silent as to whether the county has an exclusive means of annexation, the lower court’s judgment approving annexation is affirmed. Section 171.044(4), Florida Statutes (1975).

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
ACCOMPANYING  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATAMETRICS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE THREE MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED APRIL 25,  1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    APR-25-1999
<CASH>                                              310
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     2,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                       4,596
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7,342
<PP&E>                                            7,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4,476
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            172
<OTHER-SE>                                       39,455
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13,493
<SALES>                                           3,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,888
<CGS>                                             2,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3,071
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.10)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1




 





 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 11, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, High 20 Dividend Strategy Trust,
Series 7


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, High 20 Dividend Strategy Trust, Series 7 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on March 11, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the
Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-193540) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	Very truly yours,
	 
	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO 
	Gerardo Cipriano
	Vice President
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James Phillip RICHARDS.

No. 60460.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 7, 1977.

In re: James Phillip Richards applying for remedial writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, remedial relief and stay order.

Writ denied. There is no showing of abuse of the trial judge’s discretion. Relator’s right to request additional portions of the record on appeal is reserved.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ.,

dissent from the denial; Defendant is entitled under C.Cr.P. to designate the record on appeal; under Art. 1, § 19 of the Constitution of 1974, he has a constitutional right to a complete record of all evidence on which the judgment of conviction was based.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26452-26453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Certification Notice--253; Notice of Filing of Self-Certification 
of Coal Capability Under the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of Filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 17, 2018, Clean Energy Future--Lordstown, LLC, as owner 
and operator of a new baseload electric generating powerplant, 
submitted a coal capability self-certification to the Department of 
Energy (DOE). The FUA and regulations thereunder require DOE to publish 
a notice of filing of self-certification in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Copies of coal capability self-certification filings are 
available for

[[Page 26453]]

public inspection, upon request, in the Office of Electricity, Mail 
Code OE-20, Room 8G-024, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue 
SW, Washington, DC 20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586-
5260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 17, 2018, Clean Energy Future--
Lordstown, LLC, as owner and operator of a new baseload electric 
generating powerplant, submitted a coal capability self-certification 
to the Department of Energy (DOE) pursuant to Sec.  201(d) of the 
Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 (FUA), as amended, and 
DOE regulations in 10 CFR 501.60, 61. The FUA and regulations 
thereunder require DOE to publish a notice of filing of self-
certification in the Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 8311(d)(1) and 10 CFR 
501.61(c). Title II of FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 et seq.), 
provides that no new baseload powerplant may be constructed or operated 
without the capability to use coal or another alternate fuel as a 
primary energy source. Pursuant to the FUA, in order to meet the 
requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such a 
facility proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary), 
prior to construction or prior to operation as a baseload powerplant, 
that such powerplant has the capability to use coal or another 
alternate fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with FUA 
section 201(a) as of the date it is filed with the Secretary. 42 U.S.C. 
8311.
    The following owner of a proposed new baseload electric generating 
powerplant has filed a self-certification of coal-capability with DOE 
pursuant to FUA section 201(d) and in accordance with DOE regulations 
in 10 CFR 501.60, 61:

Owner: Clean Energy Future--Lordstown, LLC.
Capacity: 962 megawatts (MW).
Plant Location: Lordstown, OH 44481.
In-Service Date: June 1, 2018.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 31, 2018.
Brian Mills,
Electricity Policy Analyst, Office of Electricity.
[FR Doc. 2018-12263 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### CITY OF MONROE v. Lester HIGH.

No. 53320.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 1973.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Le-Roy A. Hartley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Scott Reis, City Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

James D. Sparks, Jr., Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Lester High, was tried by a judge and found guilty of a second offense of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. La.R.S. 14:98. He was sentenced as follows i1

> “DWI — $500 & costs, or in default 125 days in jail and 125 compulsory days in jail.”

In our examination of the pleadings and proceedings below, following the submission of the case to us for decision, we have found *ex proprio motu,*the trial court imposed an illegal sentence requiring remand.

The penalty provision for a second conviction of La.R.S. 14:98 reads:

> “On a second conviction, the offender shall be fined not less than one hundred twenty-five dollars nor more than five hundred dollars and shall be imprisoned for not less than one hundred twenty-five days nor more than six months.”

By imposing imprisonment upon defendant which in default of payment of the $500 fine totaled approximately eight months and ten days, the trial judge exceeded the penalty allowed.2

*217For the reasons assigned, it is ordered the sentence be set aside and the case remanded to the Monroe City Court for the Parish of Ouachita for resentencing in conformity with the law.

1

. As recorded in the Minutes, January 15, 1973.

2

. See also La.C.Cr.P. Art. 884 which states in its pertinent part: “ * * * Where the maximum prison sentence which may be imposed as a penalty for a misdemeanor is six months or less, the total period of imprisonment upon conviction of the offense, including imprisonment for default in payment of a fine or costs, shall not exceed six months for that offense.”
#### Bexin Realty Corporation, Appellant, v 348 Lucky Corporation et al., Respondents.

[736 NYS2d 40]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered on or about May 22, 2000, which, inter alia, denied and dismissed the petition pursuant to RPAPL 1921 to discharge a wraparound mortgage in the amount of $170,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS court properly excluded petitioner’s proposed amortization table and the testimony of the expert who prepared it, since the preparer had no personal knowledge of the actual payments made on the mortgage and the mortgages it wrapped, but merely created the table “on the assumption” that certain payments had been made. Similarly, the IAS court properly excluded checks, made out to or by parties not related to this proceeding, which would have demonstrated, at most, that the first two mortgages which the subject $170,000 mortgage wrapped had been paid in 1992 and 1995, respectively, which facts respondents conceded. Petitioner was only able to produce two years’ worth of checks, totaling $14,000, made payable to the holder of the $170,000 wraparound mortgage, and even considering all the evidence excluded by the IAS court, at the very least, interest and default interest would have continued to accrue to the holder of the $170,000 wraparound mortgage on the unpaid balance of the first two mortgages which it wrapped until 1992 and 1995, respectively, when those two mortgages were satisfied. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.