Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 1997 / Notices 8771

Dated: February 18, 1997.

Dee R. Ritchie,

District Manager.

[FR Doc. 97–4713 Filed 2–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1430–JA–P

Minerals Management Service

Notice and Agenda for Meeting of the

Royalty Policy Committee of the

Minerals Management Advisory Board

AGENCY: Minerals Management Service,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the

Department of the Interior (Department)

has established a Royalty Policy

Committee, on the Minerals

Management Advisory Board, to provide

advice on the Department’s management

of Federal and Indian minerals leases,

revenues, and other minerals related

policies.

Committee membership includes

representatives from States, Indian

Tribes and allottee organizations,

minerals industry associations, the

general public, and Federal

Departments.

At this fourth meeting, the Minerals

Management Service (MMS) will be

prepared to respond to questions

concerning plans to implement

previously approved reports.

The Committee will consider a report

issued by the Appeals, Settlements, and

Alternative Dispute Resolution

subcommittee, as well as a report issued

by the Phosphate Valuation

subcommittee. Additionally, the

Committee will hear status reports from

all of the subcommittees that have not

yet completed work.

DATES: The meeting will be held on:

Friday, March 21, 1997, 8:30 a.m.–4:00

p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at

the Embassy Suites, Denver Southeast,

7525 East Hampden Avenue, Denver,

Colorado 80231, telephone number

(303) 696–6644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.

Michael A. Miller, Chief, Program

Services Office, Royalty Management

Program, Minerals Management Service,

Royalty Management Program, P.O. Box

25165, MS 3060, Denver, CO 80225–

0165, telephone number (303) 231–

3413, fax number (303) 231–3362.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

location and dates of future meetings

will be published in the Federal

Register.

The meetings will be open to the

public without advanced registration.

Public attendance may be limited to the

space available.

Members of the public may make

statements during the meeting, to the

extent time permits, and file written

statements with the Committee for its

consideration.

Written statements should be

submitted to Mr. Michael A. Miller, at

the address listed above. Minutes of

Committee meetings will be available 10

days following each meeting for public

inspection and copying at the Royalty

Management Program, Building No. 85,

Denver Federal Center, Denver,

Colorado.

These meetings are being held by the

authority of the Federal Advisory

Committee Act, Public Law 92–463, 5

U.S.C. Appendix 1, and Office of

Management and Budget Circular No.

A–63, revised.

Dated: February 20, 1977.

Lucy R. Querques,

Associate Director for Royalty Management.

[FR Doc. 97–4705 Filed 2–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P

National Park Service

National Register of Historic Places;

Notification of Pending Nominations

Nominations for the following

properties being considered for listing

in the National Register were received

by the National Park Service before

February 15, 1997. Pursuant to section

60.13 of 36 CFR Part 60 written

comments concerning the significance

of these properties under the National

Register criteria for evaluation may be

forwarded to the National Register,

National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127,

Washington, DC 20013–7127. Written

comments should be submitted by

March 13, 1997.

Carol D. Shull,

Keeper of the National Register.

Colorado

Larimer County

Golden High School, 710 10th St., Golden,

97000229

Florida

Indian River County

Hausmann, Theodore, Estate, 4800 16th St.,

Vero Beach, 97000230

Volusia County

Seminole Rest, E of FL 5, western shore of

Mosquito Lagoon, Canaveral National

Seashore, Oak Hill, 97000231

Kentucky

Bourbon County

Buckner, Walker, House, 1500 Cane Ridge

Rd., Paris vicinity, 97000232

Franklin County

Frankfort Greenhouses, 210, 212, 216 E. Main

St., Frankfort, 97000233

Louisiana

Richland Parish

Downtown Delhi Historic District, 606–708

1st St. and 115–201 Broadway, Delhi,

97000234

Mississippi

Copiah County

Crystal Springs Historic District, Roughly

bounded by Independence, Pearl, Newton,

and Marion Sts., Crystal Springs, 97000236

Washington County

Greenville Commercial Historic District,

Roughly, Main St. from Walnut to Poplar

Sts., Greenville, 97000235

Nebraska

Douglas County

Gold Coast Historic District, Roughly

bounded by 36th, 40th, Jones, and Cuming

Sts., Omaha, 97000237

North Carolina

Caswell County

Johnston, John, House, 1325 NC 62, N.,

Yanceyville vicinity, 97000238

North Dakota

Eddy County

New Rockford Bridge (Historic Roadway

Bridges of North Dakota MPS), Across the

James River, unnamed co. rd., jct. With ND

15, New Rockford vicinity, 97000173

McKenzie County

Fairview Lift Bridge (Historic Roadway

Bridges of North Dakota MPS), Across the

Yellowstone River, abandoned railroad,

approximately .75 mi. S of ND 200,

Cartwright vicinity, 97000239

Tennessee

Knox County

Christenberry Club Room (Knoxville and

Knox County MPS), Jct. of Henegar and

Shamrock Aves., SW corner, Knoxville,

97000242

Riverdale School (Knoxville and Knox

County MPS), 7009 Thorngrove Pike,

Knoxville vicinity, 97000243

Seven Islands Methodist Church (Knoxville

and Knox County MPS), 8100 Seven

Islands Rd., Knoxville vicinity, 97000244

Marshall County

Brittain, Joseph, House, Jct. of Thick and

Sweeney Rds., Thick vicinity, 97000241

Sevier County

US Post Office— Sevierville, 167 Bruce St.,

Sevierville, 97000240
8772 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 1997 / Notices

Wilson County

Hale House—Patterson Hotel, 116 Depot St.,

Watertown, 97000245

Utah

Wayne County

Fruita Rural Historic District, Roughly, along

UT 24 from Sulphur Cr. to Hickman

Natural Bridge, Torrey vicinity, 97000246.

[FR Doc. 97–4647 Filed 2–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–P

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL

DEVELOPMENT

Title II Development Proposals;

Instructions for Cooperating Sponsor

Submission of FY 1996 Development

Program Results Reports

Pursuant to the Agricultural Market

and Transition Act of 1996, notice is

hereby given that the Final Draft

Guidelines for Fiscal Year 1996 P.L. 480

Title II Cooperating Sponsor Annual

Results Report is being made available

to interested parties for the required

thirty (30) day comment period.

Individuals who wish to receive a

copy of the draft guidelines should

contact: Office of Food for Peace, Room

323, SA–8, Agency for International

Development, Washington, D.C. 20523–

0809. Contact person: Gwen Johnson,

(703) 351–0110. Individuals who have

questions or comments on the draft

guidelines should contact David Nelson

at (703) 351–0168.

The thirty day comment period will

begin February 26, 1997.

Dated: February 7, 1997.

Jeanne Markunas,

Acting Director, Office of Food for Peace,

Bureau for Humanitarian Response.

Draft for Comment

Instructions for Cooperating Sponsor

Submission of FY 1996 Title II

Development Program Annual Results

Reports

I. Background

This guidance applies only to Title II

development activities.

Pursuant to Section 407(f) of the

Agricultural Trade Development and

Assistance Act of 1954 (P.L. 480), as

amended, USAID reports annually to

Congress and other interested parties on

the impact of Title II food aid in

addressing food security. Consequently,

USAID management and its field

Missions, in consultation with Title II

Cooperating Sponsors (CSs), are

establishing core results indicators that

will ensure consistency and

compatibility of information and permit

the USAID to demonstrate the impact of

food aid resources over a planned

period of time.

USAID Missions and the Office of

Food for Peace (FFP) have been

designated as ‘‘Operating Units’’ under

USAID reengineering guidelines. Each is

expected to submit a Results Review

and Resources Request (R4) report,

covering the strategic support and/or

program objectives (SOs) identified in

its strategic plan. (The draft BHR/FFP

strategic objective for Title II

Development Programs is provided in

Attachment 1.) CSs are requested to

contribute to the process by submitting

relevant information on their Title II

development program(s).

The FY 1996 Title II Annual Results

Report is to be submitted to the

respective field Missions and FFP. The

Mission will integrate findings on

complementary activities from this

report into the relevant SOs in its R4

report. It will comment on those

activities that are outside of the

Mission’s Strategic Objectives and

forward the report to FFP. FFP will use

the contents of the CSs’ Annual Results

Reports and Mission R4 reports to

satisfy USAID and Congressional

requirements to demonstrate the impact

of food aid in addressing food security

as well as to justify resource requests for

the next fiscal year.

While preparation of the Title II

Annual Results Report is the primary

responsibility of CSs, they should

consult closely with the Missions in the

R4 reporting process. For countries in

Africa without a USAID Missions

presence, CSs should consult with the

responsible REDSO. In addition to the

information required in these

guidelines, the Missions may, within

reason, and for the purposes of their

own specific information requirements,

request additional information from

CSs, related to results reporting and the

preparation of R4s.

This Title II Annual Results Report

request is consistent with the R4

guidance which has been disseminated

to Missions worldwide.

II. Purpose

This Title II Annual Results Report is

intended to provide meaningful resultsoriented information to USAID, as well

as the Congress, host governments,

stakeholders, and our ultimate

customers, the beneficiaries. It will

assist USAID Missions and FFP to

demonstrate the impact of Title II food

aid on food security by serving as an

important information source during

Mission and FFP preparation of their

R4s during the spring of 1997. The Title

II Annual Results Report is to focus on

the food aid activity’s performance

indicators and progress towards the

achievement of results. It will also

include a discussion of any

modifications to the approved Title II

activity, and a review of anticipated

resource requests for FY 98. CSs are

requested to follow the guidelines below

to the extent possible and report as well

as they can on actual performance for

FY 1996 and expected results for FYs

1997, 1998 and 1999, noting linkages to

USAID activities.

III. Submission Due Date and Review

Process

CSs must consult with their

respective Missions regarding the

submission due date, which should be

linked to the Mission R4 preparation

schedule. However, the CS must submit

one unbound copy of the Title II Annual

Results Report to the BHR/FFP officer

responsible for the country activity no

later than April 15 (March 15 for

countries without a USAID Mission

presence).

If the Mission R4 has not been

submitted to USAID Washington by the

deadline for the Annual Results Report

submission to FFP, Missions are

required to forward comments on the

Annual Results Report. In either

document, the Mission must provide

any necessary clarifications to a CS’s

Annual Results Report along with

Mission assessments of its accuracy and

completeness. For countries in Africa

without a USAID presence, such as

Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, the Gambia

and Mauritania, REDSO assumes this

responsibility.

To the extent possible, FFP will

coordinate the review of the Title II

Annual Results Reports with the Bureau

reviews of Mission R4s.

IV. Submission Length

The Title II Annual Results Report

should be thorough and concise.

Reports should total no more than 10

pages for programs with two or fewer

program components and no more than

18 pages for programs with three or

more program components, excluding

annexes. Repetition of information

already presented in the relevant

approved Development Activities Plan

(DAP) or Previously Approved Activity

(PAA) document is unnecessary.

Reference to the sections in these

documents where key issues are

elaborated (including page number and/

or section references) should be made,

as appropriate.