Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Notices 8423

1The Department has determined that Pacific

Pipe Company had no U.S. sales during the period

of review.

Corp. warehouse, 1690 North Topping,

Kansas City; Site 2 (2,815,000 sq. ft.)—

surface/underground warehouse

complex, 8300 N.E. Underground Drive,

Kansas City; Site 3 (10,000 acres)—

entire Kansas City International Airport

facility, 12600 N.W. Prairie View Road,

Kansas City; and, Site 4 (416 acres)—

surface/underground business park

(Carefree Industrial Park), 1600 N. M–

291 Highway, Sugar Creek.

The applicant is now requesting

authority to further expand the generalpurpose zone to include an additional

site (proposed Site 5 (5.75 million sq.

ft.)—underground business park and a

1,000-acre surface industrial park

(CARMAR Underground Business Park/

CARMAR Industrial Park), located at

No. 1 Civil War Road, Carthage. The

complex includes space in underground

caverns left from limestone and marble

mining. It is owned by the CARMAR

Group and includes refrigerated and

frozen warehouse space, as well as a

large intermodal facility. No specific

manufacturing requests are being made

at this time. Such requests would be

made to the Board on a case-by-case

basis.

In accordance with the Board’s

regulations, a member of the FTZ Staff

has been designated examiner to

investigate the application and report to

the Board.

Public comment on the application is

invited from interested parties.

Submissions (original and 3 copies)

shall be addressed to the Board’s

Executive Secretary at the address

below. The closing period for their

receipt is April 28, 1997. Rebuttal

comments in response to material

submitted during the foregoing period

may be submitted during the subsequent

15-day period (to May 12, 1997).

A copy of the application and

accompanying exhibits will be available

for public inspection at each of the

following locations:

Office of the Economic Development

Director, City of Carthage, City Hall,

326 Grant, Carthage, MO 64836

Office of the Executive Secretary,

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room

3716, U.S. Department of Commerce,

14th & Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,

Washington, DC 20230.

Dated: February 18, 1997.

John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4506 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

International Trade Administration

[A–549–502]

Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel

Pipes and Tubes from Thailand:

Amended Final Results of

Antidumping Duty Administrative

Review

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On November 1, 1996, the

Department of Commerce (the

Department) published the final results

of administrative review of the

antidumping duty order on certain

circular welded carbon steel pipes and

tubes from Thailand (61 FR 56515). On

January 15, 1997, the Department

published the amended final results of

that administrative review (62 FR 2131).

This review covers Saha Thai Steel Pipe

Company, SAF Steel Pipe Export

Company, and Pacific Pipe Company.1

The period of review (POR) is March 1,

1994 through February 28, 1995.

On January 16, 1997, Counsel for Saha

Thai filed an allegation, pursuant to 19

CFR 353.28, of a clerical error with

regard to the amended final results of

the above review. Saha Thai’s

submission alleged that the Department

made errors in calculating the importerspecific assessment rates for subject

merchandise sold by Saha Thai. On

January 24, 1997, petitioners in this

proceeding objected to Saha Thai’s

request, arguing that the allegation was

untimely because the alleged error

occurred in the original final results.

Petitioners claimed that the

Department’s regulations do not

authorize further alteration of the final

results except through action by the

Court of International Trade, pursuant

to 19 USC 1516a. Petitioners further

contend that 19 CFR 353.28 does not

provide for correction of clerical errors

in amended final determinations.

The Department finds that correction

of the ministerial error in the amended

final results of review is appropriate.

Section 751(h) of the Act authorizes the

Department to correct final

determinations issued pursuant to

section 751(a)(1). Because an amended

final results of review is a final

determination under section 751, the

Department may correct ministerial

errors found in amended final

determinations in accordance with 19

CFR 353.28.

In reviewing Saha Thai’s submission,

the Department found that the alleged

error in our amended final results

calculations did in fact occur and that

the same error had not been present in

the calculations for the final results of

review. Therefore, Saha Thai’s

allegation, which was filed within five

business days of the date of disclosure

of the amended final results

calculations, was timely in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.28(b). Due to a

computer programming error, the

importer-specific antidumping duty rate

was inadvertently overstated in the

amended final results. The Department

agrees with Saha Thai that this clerical

error should be corrected in accordance

with 19 CFR 353.29(c). This correction

affects only the importer-specific

assessment rates and will therefore only

change our instructions to the Customs

Service. This modification does not

change any other part of the

calculations, final results notice, or

amended final results notice.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

James Rice or Jean Kemp, AD/CVD

Enforcement Group III, Office 9, Import

Administration, International Trade

Administration, U.S. Department of

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution

Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230;

telephone: (202) 482–0162 or (202) 482–

4037, respectively.

Applicable Statute

Unless otherwise indicated, all

citations to the statute are references to

the provisions effective January 1, 1995,

the effective date of the amendments

made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act)

by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.

In addition, unless otherwise indicated,

all citations to the Department’s

regulations are to the current

regulations, as amended by the interim

regulations published in the Federal

Register on May 11, 1995 (60 FR 25130).

Scope of the Review

The products covered by this

administrative review are certain

circular welded carbon steel pipes and

tubes from Thailand. The subject

merchandise has an outside diameter

0.375 inches or more, but not exceeding

16 inches. These products, which are

commonly referred to in the industry as

‘‘standard pipe’’ or ‘‘structural tubing,’’

are hereinafter designated as ‘‘pipe and

tube.’’ The merchandise is classifiable

under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule

(HTS) item numbers 7306.30.1000,

7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032,

7306.30.5040, 7306.30.5055,

7306.30.5085 and 7306.30.5090.

Although the HTSUS subheadings are

provided for convenience and Customs
8424 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Notices

purposes, our written description of the

scope of the order is dispositive.

Amended Final Results of Review

Upon correction of the ministerial

error, we have determined that the

margin remains unchanged from the

amended final results published on

January 15, 1997. However, as discussed

above, importer specific assessment

rates will change and we will instruct

Customs accordingly.

Manufacturer/exporter

Time period Margin

(percent)

Saha Thai/

SAF ........ 3/1/94–2/28/95 7.27

The Customs Service shall assess

antidumping duties on all appropriate

entries. Individual differences between

United States price and normal value

may vary from the percentages stated

above. The Department will issue

appraisement instructions directly to

the Customs Service.

Furthermore, the following deposit

requirements will be effective for all

shipments of certain circular welded

carbon steel pipes and tubes from

Thailand entered, or withdrawn from

warehouse, for consumption on or after

the publication date of these final

results, as provided for by section

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash

deposit rates for the reviewed

companies will be the rates for those

firms as stated above; (2) for previously

investigated companies not listed above,

the cash deposit rate will continue to be

the company-specific rate published for

the most recent period; (3) if the

exporter is not a firm covered in this

review, or the original investigation, but

the manufacturer is, the cash deposit

rate will be the rate established for the

most recent period for the manufacturer

of the merchandise; and (4) the cash

deposit rate for all other manufacturers

or exporters will continue to be 15.67

percent for circular welded carbon steel

pipes and tubes, the all others rate

established in the LTFV investigations.

See Final Determination and

Antidumping Duty Order: Certain

Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes

from Thailand, (51 FR 8341, March 11,

1986).

These deposit requirements, when

imposed, shall remain in effect until

publication of the final results of the

next administrative review.

This notice also serves as a final

reminder to importers of their

responsibility under 19 CFR 353.26 to

file a certificate regarding the

reimbursement of antidumping duties

prior to liquidation of the relevant

entries during this review period.

Failure to comply with this requirement

could result in the Secretary’s

presumption that reimbursement of

antidumping duties occurred and the

subsequent assessment of double

antidumping duties.

This notice also serves as a reminder

to parties subject to administrative

protective order (APO) of their

responsibility concerning the

disposition of proprietary information

disclosed under APO in accordance

with section 353.34(d) of the

Department’s regulations. Timely

written notification of the return/

destruction of APO materials or

conversion to judicial protective order is

hereby requested. Failure to comply

with the regulations and the terms of an

APO is a sanctionable violation. This

administrative review and notice are in

accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR

353.28(c).

Dated: February 13, 1997.

Robert S. LaRussa,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–4632 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–580–815 & A–580–816]

Certain Cold-Rolled and CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products

From Korea; Extension of Time Limits

for Antidumping Duty Administrative

Reviews

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of time limits for

antidumping duty administrative

reviews of certain cold-rolled and

corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat

products from Korea.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce

(‘‘the Department’’) is extending the

time limits for the preliminary results of

the third antidumping duty

administrative reviews of the

antidumping orders on certain coldrolled and corrosion-resistant carbon

steel flat products from Korea. These

reviews cover three manufacturers and

exporters of the subject merchandise:

Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., Union Steel

Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Pohang

Iron and Steel Co., Ltd. The period of

review is August 1, 1995 through July

31, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alain Letort or John R. Kugelman, AD/

CVD Enforcement Group III—Office 8,

Import Administration, International

Trade Administration, U.S. Department

of Commerce, 14th Street and

Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington

D.C. 20230, telephone (202) 482–4243 or

482–0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

Department initiated these

administrative reviews on September

16, 1996 (61 FR 48882). Because it is not

practicable to complete these reviews

within the time limits mandated by

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of

1930 (‘‘the Act’), as amended by the

Uruguay Round Agreements Act of

1994, the Department is extending the

time limits for the preliminary results of

the aforementioned reviews to August 1,

1997. See memorandum from Joseph A.

Spetrini to Robert S. LaRussa, which is

on file in Room B–099 at the

Department’s headquarters.

This extension of time limits is in

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of

the Act.

Dated: February 18, 1997.

Joseph A. Spetrini

Deputy Assistant Secretary, AD/CVD

Enforcement Group III.

[FR Doc. 97–4508 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P

[A–570–830]

Coumarin From the People’s Republic

of China: Amended Order and Final

Determination of Antidumping Duty

Investigation in Accordance With

Decision Upon Remand

AGENCY: Import Administration,

International Trade Administration,

Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Amendment to final

determination of antidumping duty

investigation in accordance with

decision upon remand.

SUMMARY: On May 9, 1996, the Court of

International Trade (CIT) remanded to

the Department of Commerce,

International Trade Administration (the

Department), one issue arising from the

antidumping determination titled Final

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair

Value: Coumarin From the People’s

Republic of China (59 FR 66895,

December 28, 1994).

Pursuant to the remand order, the

Departmental filed its Remand

Determination: Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v.

United States, Court No. 95–03–00275,

on September 23, 1996. Upon finding

errors in the Remand Determination, the

Department filed its Amended Remand

Determination: Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v.

United States on October 3, 1996 (the

‘‘Amended Remand Results’’). In