alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                         280,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,527,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    444,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,000
<PP&E>                                      11,505,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,086,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,992,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,168,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,350,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,992,000
<SALES>                                     14,030,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,030,000
<CGS>                                       11,286,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,286,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (122,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             294,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,034,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   235,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,269,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.53)
        


</TABLE>
#### Johnny Alonzo BRAXTON et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-965.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 13, 1971.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellants.

*358Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Warren H. Petersen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Leone v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 404; Daniels v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 405.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)
  In connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Rexford A. Yeisley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:
 
 (1)The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 /s/ Rexford A. Yeisley
 Rexford A. Yeisley
 Chief Financial Officer
  June 29, 2004
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and will be retained by Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mary V. GREENE and Cathy Ann Melton.

No. 62533.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Mary V. Greene and Cathy Ann Melton, applying for writ of certiorari or review.

Writ denied.
## RECEIVED 

# \yayerMaterialScience OPPT CBIC 

## 2011 NOV 

## 29 AM": 

## 22

Bayer MaterialScience LLC November 18, 20II Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs 100 Bayer Road Pittsburgh, PA 15205-9741 Phone: 412777 2172 FAX: 4127777484 e-mail: Marcia.Levinson@ bayer.com Document Control Office (7407 M) Attention: TSCA Section 4 Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics USEPA, Room G-099 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460
Re: Application for Exemption from Testing on Benzene, l-cbloro-4-(trifluorometbyl)-, CAS No. 98-56-6 underTSCA Section 4 TestRule (OPPT 2009-0112) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Bayer submits this application for exemption from testing for Benzene, l-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-, CAS # 98-56-6, underthe TSCA Section 4 test rule for ready biodegration and aquatic toxicity. Bayer's request for this exemption is based on the information thatthis material is not imported neat, but only as a minor component in formulations. Bayer understands that ifthis application is granted beforethe reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) ofTSCAexpires, Bayermust pay fair and equitable reimbursementto the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs ofcomplying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting ofBayer's application was based. Questions relatedto this exemption application should be forwarded to Marcia Levinson, 100 Bayer Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15205,412-777-2172, Marcia.levinson@bayer.com. Sincerely,

.cia Levinson

# -- 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 40120000011 Regulatory Compliance Specialist ML:sah 

## CONTAINS NO CBI

Doc.

The information herein is being provided in good faith for informational purposes only, without warranty or guarantee except as expressly provided in any written sales agreement between you and Bayar MaterialScience LLC (BMS). By providing this information, you are not in any way released from the obligation to independently verify the information and to evaluate BMS products for your intended uses and purposes. The application, use and/or processing of BMS products and any products which are manufactured using BMS products on the bases of any information being provided herein are beyond the control of BMS and are the sole responsibility of the customer.

# ------------------- CERTIFIED

# -- MAIL,., 

# 0, '

Q<lf) (:: J..V\f 

## i.:E .'\ 

# BayerMaterialScience

., , r '" 

# I II!**~:;** Bayer Materia/Science LLC 

# I

100 Bayer Road

### ~ij~z**Q~** 0 It; q (.) Pittsburgh, PA 15205-9741 

### 7008 1140 0004 5930 7496

## ~ T, -.. ,- Cl.**~j'** ­ !(,;ii' N (j

### r~**~** 

# "" $'i'"i**~** 

# :.j 0
a.**~ ;~.~**  '.:' 

### f!: (/l ''1**~i;j ~**  '\. c:,t (0 0**~:... '"~**  Document Control Office (7407M) 

### lS'o 

## « N :.t.lIN("\ 0 ::! Attention: TSCA Section 4 " 

## .. " " 

## . Offiee of Pollution Prevention and Toxies



# ... USEPA, Room G-099 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

# .. "t. Washington, DC 20460 

# •

SSltlO lSt:lI:I
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This  Amendment No. 3 to  Employment  Agreement is made and entered into on
the 22nd day of May, 1997,  among PAMIDA HOLDINGS  CORPORATION  ("Holdings"),  a
Delaware  corporation,  PAMIDA, INC.  ("Pamida"),  a Delaware  corporation,  and
STEVEN S.  FISHMAN  (the  "Executive").  Holdings  and Pamida  collectively  are
referred to in this Amendment No. 3 as the "Companies".

                                      * * *

     WHEREAS,  the  Companies  and the  Executive  are parties to an  Employment
Agreement dated September 22, 1995 (the "Employment Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS,  the  Companies  and the  Executive  have  amended the  Employment
Agreement by Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 thereto; and

     WHEREAS,  the  Companies  and the Executive now desire to further amend the
Employment  Agreement  for the purpose of correcting an error in Amendment No. 2
to the Employment Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Companies and the Executive agree as follows:

     1. Paragraph 1(a) of Amendment No. 2 to the Employment  Agreement hereby is
amended so as to correctly read as follows:

     "(a) If the  consolidated  earnings of Holdings and its  subsidiaries (on a
          first-in,  first-out  basis with respect to  merchandise  inventories)
          before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization for Fiscal 1998
          (the "EBITDA") are less than $42,000,000, then the Executive shall not
          be entitled to any incentive bonus for Fiscal 1998."

     2. As hereby amended, the Employment Agreement and Amendments No. 1 and No.
2 thereto shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Companies  and the  Executive  have executed this
Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement on the day and year first above written.

PAMIDA HOLDINGS CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation
                                    /s/ Steven S. Fishman
                                        -----------------
By: /s/ Frank A. Washburn               Steven S. Fishman
        -----------------
        Frank A. Washburn, Executive
        Vice President

PAMIDA, INC., a Delaware
corporation

By: /s/ Frank A. Washburn
        -----------------
        Frank A. Washburn, Executive
        Vice President
Exhibit 10.5 Unanimous Written Consent of Board of Directors


Exhibit 10.5




UNANIMOUS CONSENT IN LIEU OF A SPECIAL MEETING

OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

SMARTDATA CORPORATION.




The Undersigned, being the sole Director of SmartData Corporation (the Company), hereby takes the following action;




WHEREAS, SmartData Corporation is desirous of settling all outstanding convertible debts of $81,158 due to Burkeley J. Priest a former sole Officer and Director of the Company. Such settlement to occur through the execution of a debt settlement agreement which requires a cash payment of $19,500 and the issuance of a $33,341, two year, noninterest bearing promissory note due February 24, 2016.




WHEREAS, SmartData Corporation is desirous of settling all outstanding convertible debts of $16,659 due to the Munson Family Limited Partnership, an entity controlled by Gerard Rice, a former director and officer of the Company. Such settlement to occur through the execution of a debt settlement agreement which requires the issuance of a $16,659, two year, noninterest bearing promissory note due February 24, 2016.




WHEREAS, SmartData Corporation is desirous of settling all outstanding convertible debts of $15,500 due to Marcel Vifian.  Such settlement to occur through a cash payment of $15,500.




WHEREAS,   The Board of Directors deems it in the best interest of the Company to settle all outstanding convertible debts as of February 24, 2014.




THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, SmartData Corporation shall execute a Debt Settlement Agreement with Burkeley J. Priest which requires a cash payment of $19,500 and the issuance of a $33,341, two year, noninterest bearing promissory note due February 24, 2016;




BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, SmartData Corporation shall execute a Debt Settlement Agreement with Munson Family Limited Partnership which requires the issuance of a $16,659, two year, noninterest bearing promissory note due February 24, 2016.




BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, SmartData Corporation shall settle the outstanding convertible debt due to Marcel Vifian through a $15,500 cash payment.




BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Unanimous Consent be placed into the minute book of the Company with the proceedings of the Board of Directors and that this consent shall have the same force and effect as if a meeting of the directors were held.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this document to be effective this 24th day of February, 2014.




	
	/s/Bruce Lybbert


	Bruce Lybbert
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3615]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.

SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL(S):
    (1) Collection title: Application for Spouse Annuity Under the 
Railroad Retirement Act.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: AA-3
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0042
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: May 31, 1997
    (5) Type of request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 10,800
    (8) Total annual responses: 10,800
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 5,982
    (10) Collection description: The Railroad Retirement Act (RRA) 
provides for the payment of annuities to spouses of railroad retirement 
annuitants who meet the requirements under the RRA. The application 
obtains information supporting the claim for benefits based on being a 
spouse of an annuitant.
    The information is used in determining entitlement to and amount of 
the annuity applied for.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: Copies of the form and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3615 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7518

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWAYNE MANNING, a/k/a Rude Dog, a/k/a Jonathan

Manning,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-95-156-H, CA-02-356-5-H)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 24, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Manning, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Manning, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When,

as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on

procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue

unless the movant can demonstrate both “‘(1) that jurists of reason

would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim

of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of

reason would find it debatable whether the district court was

correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684

(4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)),

cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 318 (2001). We have reviewed the record

and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that

Manning has not made the requisite showing. See United States v.

Manning, Nos. CR-95-156-H; CA-02-356-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2002;

filed Sept. 27, 2002 & entered Sept. 30, 2002). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8769-8770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[OR-095-07-6310-04: G7-0093]


Emergency Closure of Public Lands; Lane County, Oregon

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Emergency closure of public lands and access roads in Lane 
County, Oregon.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that certain public lands and access 
roads in Lane County, Oregon are temporarily closed to motor vehicle 
operation and shooting, from February 7, 1997 through September 30, 
1997. This closure is made under the authority of 43 CFR 8364.1. The 
public lands affected by this emergency closure are specifically 
identified as follows:

Willamette Meridian, Oregon

T. 19 S., R. 5 W.,
    Sec. 5: N\1/2\, S\1/2\SW\1/4\, E\1/2\SE\1/4\.

    All roads on the public lands listed above are closed as specified 
above, including specifically BLM Roads Nos. 18-5-31, 19-5-5, 19-5-5.1, 
19-5-5.2 and 19-5-5.3.
    The following persons, operating within the scope of their official 
duties, are exempt from the provisions of this closure order: Bureau 
employees; state, local and federal law enforcement and fire protection 
personnel; the holders of BLM road use permits that include roads 
within the closure area; the purchaser of BLM timber within the closure 
area and its employees and subcontractors. Access by additional parties 
may be allowed, but must be approved in advance in writing by the 
Authorized Officer.
    Any person who fails to comply with the provisions of this closure 
order may be subject to the penalties provided in 43 CFR 8360.0-7, 
which include a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment not to 
exceed 12 months,

[[Page 8770]]

as well as the penalties provided under Oregon State law.
    The public lands and roads temporarily closed to public use under 
this order will be posted with signs at points of public access.
    The purpose of this emergency temporary closure is to protect 
persons from potential harm associated with use of the identified 
public lands for drinking parties and related reckless and/or dangerous 
activities, as well as to protect the public from potential harm from 
logging operations and related timber harvest activities.

DATES: This closure is effective from February 7, 1997 through 
September 30, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the closure order and maps showing the location of 
the closed lands and roads are available from the Eugene District 
Office, P.O. Box 10226 (2890 Chad Drive), Eugene, Oregon 97440.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine M. Walsh, South Valley Area 
Manager, Eugene District Office, at (541) 683-6600.

    Date: February 6, 1997.
Christine M. Walsh,
South Valley Area Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-4743 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0980 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-129-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. John Patrick NORTHCUTT and Safeco Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 71-504.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James R. Stewart, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Banker's Store (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
Blankenship, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 20, 2004                     /s/ ALBERT BLANKENSHIP
                                            ----------------------
                                            Albert Blankenship,
                                            Chief Financial Officer