8438 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Notices

appropriate action to be taken, but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4547 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP96–383–003]

CNG Transmission Corporation; Notice

of Compliance Tariff Filing

February 19, 1997.

Take notice that on February 13, 1997,

CNG Transmission Corporation (CNG),

tendered for filing as part of its FERC

Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume No.

1, the following tariff sheets, with an

effective date of November 1, 1996:

2nd Substitute 2nd Revised Sheet No. 369

Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 378

Original Sheet No. 378A

CNG states that the purpose of this

filing is to revise CNG’s proposed tariff

provisions with regard to Negotiated

Rates, as directed by the Commission’s

January 29, 1997, ‘‘Order on Compliance

Filing.’’

CNG states that copies of its filing

have been mailed to CNG’s customers

and interested state commissions, and to

parties to the captioned proceeding.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, DC,

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed in accordance with Section

154.210 of the Commission’s

Regulations. Protests will be considered

by the Commission in determining the

appropriate action to be taken but will

not serve to make protestants parties to

the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

on file with the Commission and are

available for public inspection in the

Public Reference Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4548 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. CP97–242–000]

Northwest Pipeline Corporation, Notice

of Request Under Blanket

Authorization

February 19, 1997.

Take notice that on February 12, 1997,

Northwest Pipeline Corporation

(Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake

City, Utah 84108, filed in Docket No.

CP97–242–000 a request pursuant to

Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the

Commission’s Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and

157.211) for approval to upgrade its

Portland West Meter Station in

Multnomah County, Oregon, to

accommodate a request by Northwest

Natural Gas Company (Northwest

Natural) for additional capacity at that

delivery point to more reliably serve the

peak-day requirements of its

distribution customers, under the

blanket certificate issued in Docket No.

CP82–433–000, pursuant to Section 7(c)

of the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully

set forth in the request which is on file

with the Commission and open to

public inspection.

Northwest proposes to upgrade the

Portland West Meter Station’s capacity

by using an orifice plate, appropriatelysized for a 0.65 Beta Ratio. Northwest

says this is available at the station and

has been used in the past for operational

purposes to accommodate Northwest

Natural’s peak-day requirements at that

delivery point. Northwest states that by

recalculating the meter station capacity

using a Beta ratio of 0.65, rather than the

0.6 Beta factor it uses on a standard

basis, results in an increase in the

maximum design delivery capacity from

110,000 Dth/d to 134,000 Dth/d at the

450 psig delivery pressure.

Northwest says there will be no cost

associated with the proposed capacity

increase since no modification of

facilities is required. Northwest explains

there will be no increase in its total

contract demand delivery obligations

nor any impact on its system peak day

deliveries. Northwest estimates that the

requirements to be served via the

upgraded meter station capacity will

result in no increased annual

throughput on its system. Northwest

explains that any deliveries made to

Northwest Natural through the Portland

West Meter Station will be gas delivered

either for Northwest Natural or other

shippers for whom Northwest is

authorized to transport gas. Northwest

states that any volumes delivered to the

Portland West delivery point will be

within the authorized entitlements of

such shippers. Northwest says its tariff

does not prohibit the capacity upgrade

of delivery point facilities.

Any person or the Commission’s staff

may, within 45 days after issuance of

the instant notice by the Commission,

file pursuant to Rule 214 of the

Commission’s Procedural Rules (18 CFR

385.214) a motion to intervene or notice

of intervention and pursuant to Section

157.205 of the Regulations under the

Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a

protest to the request. If no protest is

filed within the time allowed therefor,

the proposed activity shall be deemed to

be authorized effective the day after the

time allowed for filing a protest. If a

protest is filed and not withdrawn

within 30 days after the time allowed

for filing a protest, the instant request

shall be treated as an application for

authorization pursuant to Section 7 of

the Natural Gas Act.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4545 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–112–019]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;

Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC

Gas Tariff

February 19, 1997.

Take notice that on February 13, 1997,

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company

(Tennessee) tendered for filing to

become part its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth

Revised Volume No. 1 and Original

Volume No. 2 the following Revised

Tariff Sheets:

Fifth Revised Volume No. 1

Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 20

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 21

Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 21A

Twenty-first Revised Sheet No. 22

Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 22A

Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 23

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 23A

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 23B

Second Revised Sheet No. 23C

Eighteenth Revised Sheet No. 24

Thirteenth Revised Sheet No. 25

Seventh Revised Sheet No. 26

Eighth Revised Sheet No. 26A

Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 26B

Sixth Revised Sheet No. 27

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 28

First Revised Sheet No. 29

Second Revised Sheet No. 109

First Revised Sheet No. 128A

Third Revised Sheet No. 129

First Revised Sheet No. 129A

First Revised Sheet No. 134

First Revised Sheet No. 139

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 154

First Revised Sheet No. 154A

First Revised Sheet No. 155

Third Revised Sheet No. 155E

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 159

First Revised Sheet No. 196

First Revised Sheet No. 200

First Revised Sheet No. 201

Third Revised Sheet No. 304

Fourth Revised Sheet No. 337

Second Revised Sheet No. 337A

First Revised Sheet No. 338

Third Revised Sheet No. 339

Second Revised Sheet No. 339A

First Revised Sheet No. 366

First Revised Sheet No. 367

Third Revised Sheet No. 398A
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Notices 8439

First Revised Sheet No. 602

Original Volume No. 2

Thirty-Third Revised Sheet No. 5

Tennessee states that the purpose of

this filing is to implement the

Settlement Rates and other tariff

changes provided for in the Stipulation

and Agreement filed on April 5, 1996,

in Docket No. RP95–112 (Stipulation)

which the Commission approved by an

order issued on October 30, 1996, 77

FERC ¶ 61,083 (‘‘October 30 Order’’).

Tennessee further states that on January

29, 1997, the Commission denied the

requests for rehearing of the October 30

Order. Tennessee proposes that the tariff

sheets become effective on March 1,

1997, with the exception of Sheet Nos.

134, 139, 196, 200 and 201 which are to

become effective on July 1, 1995, in

accord with the Stipulation.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Section

385.211 of the Commission’s Rules and

Regulations. All such protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Copies of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4546 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER90–168–031, et al.]

National Gas & Electric L.P., et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

February 18, 1997.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. National Gas & Electric L.P., AES

Power, Inc., Direct Electric Inc., Energy

Services Inc., QST Energy Trading Inc.,

TransAlta Enterprises Corporation, and

LISCO, Inc.

[Docket Nos. ER90–168–031, ER94–890–012,

ER94–1161–011, ER95–1021–006, ER96–

553–005, ER96–1316–003 and ER96–1406–

002 (not consolidated)]

Take notice that the following

informational filings have been made

with the Commission and are on file

and available for inspection and

copying in the Commission’s Public

Reference Room:

On February 4, 1997, National Gas &

Electric L.P. filed certain information

required by the Commission’s March 20,

1990, order in Docket No. ER90–168–

000.

On February 4, 1997, AES Power, Inc.

filed certain information required by the

Commission’s April 8, 1994, order in

Docket No. ER94–890–000.

On January 28, 1997, Direct Electric

Inc. filed certain information required

by the Commission’s July 18, 1994,

order in Docket No. ER94–1161–000.

On February 5, 1997, Energy Services

Inc. filed certain information required

by the Commission’s June 13, 1995,

order in Docket No. ER95–1021–000.

On February 3, 1997, QST Energy

Trading Inc. filed certain information

required by the Commission’s March 14,

1996, order in Docket No. ER96–553–

000.

On February 3, 1997, TransAlta

Enterprises Corporation filed certain

information required by the

Commission’s June 12, 1996, order in

Docket No. ER96–1316–000.

On February 3, 1997, LISCO, Inc. filed

certain information required by the

Commission’s June 10, 1996, order in

Docket No. ER96–1406–000.

2. NorAm Energy Services, Inc., New

Energy Ventures, Inc., Southern Energy

Marketing Corp. Inc., TECO

EnergySource, Inc., Alliance Power

Marketing, Mid-American Power, LLC,

and PanEnergy Trading and Market

Services, L.L.C.

[Docket Nos. ER94–1247–012, ER96–1387–

002, ER96–1516–002, ER96–1563–003,

ER96–1818–004, ER96–1858–003, and ER96–

2921–002 (not consolidated)]

Take notice that the following

informational filings have been made

with the Commission and are on file

and available for inspection and

copying in the Commission’s Public

Reference Room:

On February 3, 1997, NorAm Energy

Services, Inc. filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s July

25, 1994, order in Docket No. ER94–

1247–000.

On January 31, 1997, New Energy

Ventures, Inc. filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s

September 6, 1996, order in Docket No.

ER96–1387–000.

On January 13, 1997, Southern Energy

Marketing Corporation, Inc. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s May 8, 1996, order in

Docket No. ER96–1516–000.

On February 3, 1997, TECO

EnergySource, Inc. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s June 11, 1996, order in

Docket No. ER96–1563–000.

On January 13, 1997, Alliance Power

Marketing Inc. filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s June

17, 1996, order in Docket No. ER96–

1818–000.

On February 3, 1997, Mid-American

Power, LLC filed certain information as

required by the Commission’s June 16,

1996, order in Docket No. ER96–1858–

000.

On January 30, 1997, PanEnergy

Trading and Market Services, L.L.C.

filed certain information as required by

the Commission’s October 2, 1996, order

in Docket No. ER96–2921–000.

3. Duke Energy Marketing Corp.,

Enserver, L.C. Power Providers, Inc.,

CMS Marketing, Service and Trading

Company, Strategic Energy

Management, Inc., Dayton Power &

Light Company, and EnerZ Corporation

[Docket Nos. ER96–109–008, ER96–182–005,

ER96–2303–002, ER96–2350–005, ER96–

2591–002, ER96–2602–002, and ER96–3064–

001 (not consolidated)]

Take notice that the following

informational filings have been made

with the Commission and are on file

and available for inspection and

copying in the Commission’s Public

Reference Room:

On January 30, 1997, Duke Energy

Marketing Corp. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s December 14, 1995, order

in Docket No. ER96–109–000.

On January 27, 1997, Enserver, L.C.

Duke Energy Marketing Corp. filed

certain information as required by the

Commission’s December 14, 1995, order

in Docket No. ER96–109–000.

On January 29, 1997, Power

Providers, Inc. filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s

September 3, 1996, order in Docket No.

ER96–2303–000.

On January 30, 1997, CMS Marketing,

Service and Trading Company filed

certain information as required by the

Commission’s September 6, 1996, order

in Docket No. ER96–2350–000.

On February 3, 1997, Strategic Energy

Management, Inc. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s September 13, 1996,

order in Docket No. ER96–2591–000.

On January 30, 1997, Dayton Power &

Light Company filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s

September 30, 1996, order in Docket No.

ER96–2602–000.

On January 29, 1997, EnerZ

Corporation filed certain information as

required by the Commission’s October

21, 1996, order in Docket No. ER96–

3064–000.