UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ~ ~ II ~ ~" ,~~ 0'. '~", i G"" ~. ~~'..~ j-H 'I.c Fl" . db a ,i ~i§ ,~~~..
 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES ~Ø'~~

s~ "RAuL vOMMiS~
 

Oei Z ô 20í2
 

In the Matter of C~~~~~¿ :¿6?l 'V01Y") SECRETAR'I /'
 )

) 

~-~ 

)


McWANE, INC.,
 )
 a corporation, and DOCKET NO. 9351
 ) 

)


STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD.,
 )

a limited parnership, )


Respondents.
 ) 

) 

ORDER ON RESPONDENT'S AND COMPLAINT COUNSEL'S 

MOTIONS FOR IN CAMERA TREATMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 3.45(b) of the Commission's Rules of 
 Practice, orders granting in 

camera treatment for certain materials meeting the Commission's standards were previously 

issued on August 17,2012 (granting in camera treatment for certain McWane, Inc. material); 

August 17,2012 (granting in camera treatment for certain materials submitted by non-paries,
 

including Sigma Corporation); and August 31, 2012 (granting in camera treatment for certain
 

Star Pipe Products, Ltd. material). The expert reports submitted on behalf of 
 both Complaint 

Counsel and Respondent contain information derived in par from materials that have been 

granted in camera treatment pursuant to those orders. At the direction of the Court, Respondent 

and Complaint Counsel each fied a motion for in camera treatment requesting in camera 

treatment for those portions of their expert reports referrng to in camera materiaL. Complaint 

Counsel also seeks in camera treatment for a demonstrative exhibit to be used with its expert 

containing such information. Neither side opposes the other's motion. 

Respondent's Motion, filed October 22,2012 is GRANTED. In camera treatment, for a 

period of five years, to expire on September 1,201 i is granted for the Expert Report of Dr. 

Parker Normann, ("Norm 
 ann Report") which Respondent attached to its Motion as Exhibit A. 

The public, redacted version of 
 the Norman Report is designated as RX 712A. Respondent 

shall withdraw its previous version ofRX 712A and submit the version attached to its motion to 

the court reporter for the official record. Respondent is also directed to provide an in camera, 

non-redacted version with a designation ofRX 712B, to the court reporter for the record. 

1 In order to make the expiration date of in camera treatment consistent across all exhibits for which in camera 

treatment has been granted, the expiration date shall be September 1, 2017. 
Complaint Counsel's Motion, filed October 24,2012, is GRANTED. In camera 

treatment, for a period of five years, to expire on September 1, 2017 is granted for the Expert 

Report of 
 Dr. Laurence Schumann, which is designated as CX 2260; the Rebuttal Expert Report 

of Dr. Schumann, which is designated as CX 2265; and Dr. Schumann's Rebuttal Testimony 

Demonstrative Exhibit, which is designated as CXD 3085. Complaint Counsel is directed to 

withdraw its previous version of CX 2260, CX 2265, and CXD 3085 and submit the complete 

version of these exhibits, which indicates the in camera material, to the court reporter for the 

official record. Complaint Counsel is also directed to provide a public, redacted version, of each 

of these exhibits, with the designations CX 2260A, CX 2265A, and CXD 3085A, to the court 

reporter for the official record. 

ORDERED: )) In ckp,u

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: October 26, 2012 

2