alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS

This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Registrant's
Financial Statements as of June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements:

                                                                              June 300,          December 31,
                                                                                2002                 2001
                                                                           ----------------    ----------------
<S>                                                                           <C>                 <C>
Current Ratio:

The ratio of current assets divided by current liabilities -

Current assets  (numerator)                                                   $959,874            $510,406
Current liabilities (denominator)                                              818,293             364,909

   Current ratio                                                                   1.2                 1.4

Working Capital:

Current Assets minus Current Liabilities

Current assets                                                                $959,874            $510,406
Current liabilities                                                            818,293             364,909

   Working Capital                                                             141,581             145,497

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida ex rel., Raul Hernandez RAMIREZ, Relator, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director Department of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-545.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus denied.
October 29 , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docke t Operation s West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 14 0 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 2059 0

Re: Petition for Exemption from 14 CFR 61.1 (b) (3) (vi ) (b)

Dear S i rs,

Island Airlines (IA) is requesting an exemption from 14 CFR 61.1 (b) (3) (vi ) ( B ) for pilots flying in accordance 14 CFR 135 Commuter Air Carrier operations (scheduled passenger service

with small aircraft )

. 14 CFR 61.1 (b) (3) (vi ) ( B ) requires that in order to meet the aeronautical experience require me nts for an a irline transport pilot, cross

- country must include a landing t hat is at least a straight

- line distance of more than 50 nautical miles from the original point of departur e

. IA would like for our pilots be allowed to count their flying from KHYA to KACK as

cross

- country for their ATP requirements. The straight line distance is 2 6 NM.

Scheduled operations include a departure, an en route an d an approach segment. All of these flights include the use of dead reckoning, pilotage, electronic navigation aids, radio aids, or other navigation systems

. In the case of our operation, we operate the single engine Cessna Caravan. TAS is approximately is 150 KTS. Since we operate over water, we must remain within the power off gliding distance from shore. Even in VFR conditions, most of our flight travel 50 NM across the groun d

. In IFR conditions, our flights cover more than 50 NM across the gro u nd

.

Rotorcraft and Sport ai rcraft can count flights of 25 NM as cross

- country for the aeronautical experience requirement for pilot certificatio n . The Cessna Caravan cruise speed is s imilar to aircraft of this type and as suc h would include the use of dead reckoning, pilotage, electronic navigation aids, radio aids, or other navigation systems

.

Additionally, we operate our flights with a C aptain and a First Officer. They are gaining experience operating in an airline environment with t wo crewmember coordination

. Additionally, approaches down to minimums , holding and diversions

.

Island Airlines, LLC 550 Barnstable Road | Hyannis, MA 02601 | Phone: 508.771.7774 | Fax: 508.827.4758An exemption to 14 CFR 61.1 (b) (3) (vi ) ( B ) for pilots operating in a two pilot crew commuter operation under 14 CFR 135 would be in the public interest , because it will allow pilots to use

their actual airline cross

- country experience to meet the aeronautical experience require me nts for

an a irline transport pilot certificate.

Respectfully,

Joseph W. Rose

Director of Operation s Island Airlines

550 Barnstable Rd. Hangar 1 Hyannis, MA 02601 jrose@islandair.net (508) 202

- 1652
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993; National Medical Practice Knowledge Bank

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 3, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Allegheny-Singer Research 
Institute has filed written notification simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
names of certain members. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties are: NCR 
Corporation, Parallel Systems, El Segundo, CA, formerly doing business 
at AT&T Corporation, GIS, Large Systems Solutions Division, El Segundo, 
CA; NCR Corporation, Human Interface Technology Center, Atlanta, GA, 
formerly doing business as AT&T Corporation, GIS, Human Interface 
Technology Center, Atlanta, GA; AT&T Corporation, Business Markets 
Division, Washington, DC, formerly doing business as AT&T Business 
Communications Services, Holmdel, NJ; and Allegheny University of the 
Health Sciences formerly doing business as The Medical College of 
Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, PA. The name under 
which these parties will operate is the National Medical Practice 
Knowledge Bank. The general area of planned activity is to conduct 
cooperative research concerning multimedia information access, 
retrieval and associated software technologies.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activities of the National Practice Knowledge Bank. Membership in the 
Bank remains open, and the Bank intends to file additional written 
notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 17, 1995, Allegheny Singer Research Institute filed its 
original notification on behalf of the National Medical Practice 
Knowledge Bank. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 15, 
1996 (61 FR 6038). The last notification was filed with the Department 
on December 19, 1995, and was published in the Federal Register on May 
14, 1996 (61 FR 6038).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-4875 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Schedule of Salary Actions for Named Executive Officers 

 

																	
	 Name
	  	Current
Salary	 	  	Increase ($)	 	  	Increase (%)	 	 	New Salary*	 
	 John D. Finnegan
	  	$	1,325,000	  	  	 	—  	 	  	 	—  	 	 	$	1,325,000	  
	 Richard G. Spiro
	  	 	890,000	  	  	$	35,000	  	  	 	3.9	% 	 	 	925,000	  
	 Paul J. Krump
	  	 	770,000	  	  	 	40,000	  	  	 	5.2	  	 	 	810,000	  
	 Dino E. Robusto
	  	 	770,000	  	  	 	40,000	  	  	 	5.2	  	 	 	810,000	  
	 Harold L. Morrison, Jr.
	  	 	660,000	  	  	 	35,000	  	  	 	5.3	  	 	 	695,000	  

  

	*	Effective as of April 1, 2014
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21

             ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant

The following list includes the Registrant and all of its subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2005. The voting equity interests of each company shown is owned,
to the extent indicated by the percentage, by the company immediately above,
which is not indented to the same degree. All subsidiaries of the Registrant
appearing in the following table are included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Registrant and its subsidiaries.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                              State of               Percentage of Voting
       Name of Company                     Incorporation            Equity Interests Owned
<S>                                        <C>                      <C>
Artesian Resources Corporation                Delaware
Artesian Water Company, Inc.                  Delaware                       100
Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc.             Pennsylvania                   100
Artesian Development Corporation              Delaware                       100
Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc.          Delaware                       100
Artesian Utility Development, Inc.            Delaware                       100
AquaStructure Delaware, L.L.C.                Delaware                        33 1/3
</TABLE>

                         ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION
                 SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Balance at      Charged to         Charged                      Balance at
                                                    Beginning       Costs and        to Other                       End of
                  Additions                         Of Period        Expenses        Accounts      Deductions       Period
<S>                                                <C>               <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Classification
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
     Valuation allowance for deferred tax
     assets                                          $482,000                                        $159,000        $323,000
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
     Valuation allowance for deferred tax
     assets                                          $512,000                                         $30,000        $482,000
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
     Valuation allowance for deferred tax
     assets                                          $506,000                          $6,000                        $512,000
</TABLE>
#### Eugene LANGLEY v. STATE.

No. 38324.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus discharged without opinion.
ENERGY CODE FORNEW FEDERALCOMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; PROPOSED RULE September4, 1996 AGENDA 9:00- 9:15 Opening Remarks, Introductions, AgendaReview 9:15- 9:25 Lawrence R. Wethje (Air-Conditioning & Refrigeration Institute) 9:25- 9:35 Robert Curry (Plumbing Manufacturers Institute) 9:35- 9:55 Unscheduled Speakers 9:55- Closing

- Next Steps
National Advisory Council for

Environmental Policy and Technology

Agenda 

March 26-27, 2012

1201 Constitution Ave, NW

EPA East Building, Room 1153

Washington, DC 20004

Purpose: For the Council to present final advice letters addressing two topics: 1) leadership development 

and organizational transformation at EPA, and 2) the need for technologies that can help address 

environmental problems experienced by environmental justice communities and other vulnerable 

populations. In addition, the Council will discuss the charge on Sustainability and the U.S. EPA and approve 

the first draft advice letter on sustainability.

Monday, March 26, 2012

8:45 am Registration

9:15 am Welcome, Introductions, and Overview of Agenda

 Mark Joyce

Associate Director and NACEPT Acting Designated Federal Officer

Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

EPA Office of the Administrator

 Cynthia Jones-Jackson

Acting Director

Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

EPA Office of the Administrator

 Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.

NACEPT Chair

9:30 am Overview and Discussion of NACEPT’s Fourth and Final Advice Letter on EPA 

Workforce Planning: Strategies to Attract and Retain Superior Executive 

Leadership Talent

 Dr. Olufemi Osidele and Sara Kendall

NACEPT Leadership Workgroup Members

 Craig E. Hooks

 Assistant Administrator

 EPA Office of Administration and Resources Management 
2

10:15 am Break

10:30 am Overview and Discussion of NACEPT’s Final Advice Letter: Technologies for 

Environmental Justice Communities and Other Vulnerable Populations

 Dr. DeWitt John and Dr. Mark A. Mitchell 

NACEPT Vulnerable Populations Workgroup Co-Chairs 

 Lek Kadeli

Acting Assistant Administrator

EPA Office of Research and Development

 Fred Hauchman 

Director, Office of Science Policy

EPA Office of Research and Development

11:15 am Public Comments

11:45 am Lunch 

1:00 pm Overview and Discussion of NACEPT’s Charge and First Draft Advice Letter 

on Sustainability and the U.S. EPA

 Dr. James H. Johnson, Jr.

NACEPT Chair

 Robert Olson

NACEPT Sustainability

Workgroup Member

 Bicky Corman

Deputy Associate Administrator

EPA Office of Policy

 Ramona Trovato

Principal Deputy Assistant 

Administrator for Management

EPA Office of Research and 

Development

 Matt Bogoshian

Senior Policy Counsel

EPA Office of Chemical Safety and 

Pollution Prevention

2:15 pm Council Discussion and Approval of NACEPT’s First Draft Advice Letter on 

Sustainability and the U.S. EPA

2:45 pm Break

3:00 pm Sustainability Workgroups meet in separate, concurrent sessions.

5:00 pm ADJOURN
3

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

9:00 am Overview of EPA’s Innovation Program

 Peter W. Preuss, PhD

Chief Innovation Officer 

EPA Office of Research and Development 

10:00 am Sustainability Workgroups meet in separate, concurrent sessions.

11:15 am Break

11:30 am Workgroup Report-Outs

12:30 pm Public Comments 

12:45 pm Chair’s Meeting Summary, Action Items, and 2012 Meeting Dates

2:00 pm ADJOURN
No. 00-7089.

#### Tapia *v.*United States.

C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO 
 SECOND AMENDED
AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment dated March 4, 2014 between Choice Hotels International, Inc.
(“Employer”), a Delaware corporation with principal offices at 1 Choice Hotels Circle, Rockville, Maryland 20850, and Stephen P. Joyce (“Employee”), amends the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated May 24,
2012, between Employer and Employee (the “Employment Agreement”). 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained in
this Amendment, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to the following terms: 

1. Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“Term. Subject to the provisions for termination hereinafter provided, the term of this Agreement (the “Term”) shall be
effective as of May 25, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) and shall terminate on May 25, 2018 (the “Termination Date”).” 

2. All other terms of the Agreement not modified herein remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date first set forth above. 

Employer: 

CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

By: /s/ Patrick Cimerola  

Title: SVP –Administration 

Employee: 

/s/ Stephen P. Joyce
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-2013-0465

Directorate Identifier: 2012NM085AD

B/E AERO 1XC22-0100-35-006, R1 --- 12/15/11

B/E AERO 1XC22-0100-35-006 --- 4/8/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Document

960 CENTURY DRIVE
MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055




First Amendment to Lease Agreement


    This First Amendment is made as of this 9th day of August, 2021 by and between Century Park Investments, LP ("Landlord"), and Select Medical Corporation ("Tenant").


    BACKGROUND
A.Landlord and Tenant are parties to that certain Office Lease Agreement dated October 30, 2014 (thereto, the “Lease”) pursuant to which Landlord leased to Tenant, and Tenant leased from Landlord, approximately 17,147 of rentable square feet of space known as the Second Floor, in the building located at 960 Century Drive, Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.  All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Lease; and


B.Landlord and Tenant now desire to amend the Lease as hereinafter set forth.


    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Landlord and Tenant amend the following terms contained in the Lease dated October 30, 2014 as follows:


1.Both Landlord and Tenant agree to renew the Lease Agreement for the second floor. an additional seven (7) years, effective December 1, 2021.
2.The Lease Term will expire midnight November 30, 2028.
3.The beginning Rental Rate effective December 1, 2021 will be $20.50/rsf.
4.The Rental Rate will increase by 2.5% annually.










All other terms and conditions contained in the Lease and not amended hereby remain in full force and effect.
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to be duly executed on the day and year first set forth above.


Landlord:    Century Park Investments, LP                                


By:                        
John M. Ortenzio, Manager of the General Partner




Date: _______________________________


Tenant:        Select Medical Corporation


By:                         




______________________________
(Print name)


Title: ________________________________




                        
Date: ________________________________
#### Olivia Dupar DRUMMER v. CENTRAL PECAN SHELLING CO. and Travelers Ins. Co.

No. 62402.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Olivia Dupar Drummer applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Avoyelles.

Writ granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that *875counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 1, 2006 ofCrown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: February 15, 2006                                                                    /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut   Chairman of the Board, President & Chief
#### Patrick Robert JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Donald S. GENUNG, Sheriff, Pinellas County, Respondent.

No. 73-569.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 5, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the quarterly report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending April 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Bertram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Rafik Moursalien, the
Controller of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

         By:   Daniel Bertram
               --------------
               Daniel Bertram, CEO

         Dated: November 28, 2005


         By:   Rafik Moursalien
               ----------------
               Rafik Moursalien, Controller

         Dated: November 28, 2005
#### David KINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.