alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMRICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERA TRAE COMMISSION 

COMMSSIONERS: Edith Ramirez, Chairwoman 

Julie Bril 

Maureen K. Ohlhausen 

Joshua D. Wright 

In the Matter of 

) 

) PUBLIC 

MCWANE, INC., 

a corporation, and 

) 

) 

) 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

a limited partnership. 

) 

) DOCKET NO. 9351 

) 

) 

RESPONDENT'S COMPILATION OF MATERIS TO PRESENT
 

DURING ORA ARGUMENT
 

J. Alan Truitt 

Thomas W. Thagard III 

Maynard Cooper and Gale PC 

1901 Sixth Avenue North 

2400 Regions Harbert Plaza 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

Attorneysfor Respondent McWane, Inc. 

Dated: August 15,2013 

Joseph A. Ostoyich 

Erik T. Koons 

Wiliam C. Lavery 

Heather Souder Choi 

Baker Botts L.L.P. 

The Warner 

1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004-2420 

1 





































"

~ 

,. ~ idonlt believe themarkot or competiive conditions over the next 3 .. 5 years wil provide a reaso

. generate acceptable income or normalize inventory levels with the current structure. 






CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on August 15,2013, a tre and correct copy of 
 Respondents Compilation of Materials to Present During Oral Argument was fied electronically using the FTC's efiing system, and served by hand on the following:
 

Donald S. Clark 

Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Rm. H-113 

Washington, DC 20580 

DCLAR@ftc.gov 

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania 
 Ave., NW, Rm. H-106 

Washington, DC 20580 

OALJ@ftc.gov 

I further certify that on August 15,2013, a true and correct copy of 
 Respondents Compilation of 
 Materials to Present During Oral Argument was served by email on the following: 

Ted Hassi 

Linda Holleran
 

Thomas Brock 

Federal Trade Commission 

601 New Jersey Ave., NW 

Rm. NJ-6249 

Washington, DC 20001 

EHASSI@ftc.gov 

LHOLLERAN@ftc.gov 

TBROCK@ftc.gov 

By: lsI Wiliam C. Lavery
 

Wiliam C. Lavery 

Counselfor McWane, Inc.
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec

2006 Actual 70 46 2 48 (21) 31

Jan - Mar

2007 Actual 159 126 9 134 (25) 6

Apr - Jun

2007 Actual (153) (139) 5 (133) 19 25

Jul - Sep

2007 Actual 35 116 (31) 85 50 75

Oct - Dec

2007 Actual 91 126 (53) 73 (18) 57

Jan - Mar

2008 Actual 187 244 (68) 176 (11) 46

Apr - Jun

2008 Actual (74) 13 (80) (66) 7 53

Jul - Sep

2008 Actual 179 530 (33) 497 318 372

Oct - Dec November 3, 2008 596 550 (26) 524 (72) 299

2008 Actual 556 569 (18) 551 (5) 367

Memo: Forecast Revision (40) 19 8 28 67 67

Jan - Mar November 3, 2008 561 368 (31) 337 (224) 75

2009 February 2, 2009 618 493 (17) 476 (142) 225

Memo: Forecast Revision 56 125 14 139 83 150

Apr - Jun

2009 February 2, 2009 324 165 (21) 144 (180) 45

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7509 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7509

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the TSA to offer 
    certain secondary screenings of passengers prior to a physical 
inspection if an object of concern is detected, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 9, 2020

   Mr. Cohen (for himself and Mr. Carson of Indiana) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the TSA to offer 
    certain secondary screenings of passengers prior to a physical 
inspection if an object of concern is detected, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TSA Second Screening Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF SECONDARY SCREENING.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 44901(l)(2) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``, including by ensuring passengers undergoing such 
screening are afforded an opportunity to undergo a second such 
screening prior to undergoing a physical inspection if such initial 
screening detects an object of concern''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles Wyatt McCRANIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. L-432.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Oct. 28, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### William GRIFFIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.4


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our report  dated February 27, 2009, except for the effects of the changes in disclosure for reportable segments discussed in Note 10, the changes in noncontrolling interest discussed in Note 2, changes in earnings per share discussed in Note 2, collectively as to which the date is May 21, 2009 and except for changes in items reflected in discontinued operations discussed in Note 5, as to which the date is February 28, 2011 relating to the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, of equity and of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, which appears in Colonial Realty Limited Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10‐K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts”  in such Registration Statement.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Birmingham, Alabama


May 6, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7491 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7491

  To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 
revive the section 1603 program allowing the Secretary of the Treasury 
     to convert certain clean energy tax credits into cash grants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 6, 2020

    Mr. Casten of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 
revive the section 1603 program allowing the Secretary of the Treasury 
     to convert certain clean energy tax credits into cash grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Tax Credit Direct Payment Act 
of 2020''.

SEC. 2. SECTION 1603 PROGRAM REVIVED.

    (a) In General.--Section 1603 of the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``2009 or 2010'' 
                and inserting ``2020'', and
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``after 2010'' 
                and inserting ``after 2020'' and by striking ``during 
                2009 or 2010'' and inserting ``during 2020 or 2021'',
            (2) in subsection (e)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``January 1, 
                2013'' and inserting ``January 1, 2021'',
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ``or in 
                subparagraphs (5)(C) or (5)(E) of section 48(a)'' after 
                ``section 45(d)'' and by striking ``January 1, 2014'' 
                and inserting ``January 1, 2021'',
                    (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``except those 
                described in subparagraphs (5)(C) or (5)(E) of section 
                48(a)'' after ``section 48'' and by striking ``January 
                1, 2017'' and inserting ``January 1, 2022'', and
            (3) in subsection (j), by striking ``before October 1, 
        2011'' and inserting ``before October 1, 2022''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Restoration Hardware, Inc.
Corte Madera, California

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-58684, 333-45638, 333-66065, 333-72288,
333-81430 and 333-103639 of Restoration Hardware, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-70624 of Restoration
Hardware, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated March 30, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to the
restatement described in Note 5) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Restoration Hardware, Inc. for the year ended January 31, 2004.

Our
audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Restoration Hardware, Inc. listed in
Item 15(a)(2). The financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

San
Francisco, California
April 12, 2004

---

QuickLinks
#### Harold HUNT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1187.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, June 7, 2018.

PLACE: Closed Commission Hearing Room 10800.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    Commissioner Stein, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the closed meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 551-5400.

    Dated: May 31, 2018.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12116 Filed 6-1-18; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 10A OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Walter C Lazarcheck, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Farrel Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report information; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.


/s/ Walter C Lazarcheck
---------------------------
Walter C Lazarcheck
Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2003
#### Christine Fagg MORTON, Petitioner, v. VILLAGE OF NORTH PALM BEACH, Florida, Respondent.

No. 1993.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 2, 1970.

Graham W. Stikelether, Jr., and Walter T. Erickson, Vero Beach, for petitioner.

No appearance by respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari petitioner seeks to review an order of the *694circuit court affirming her conviction by a municipal court for the alleged offenses of careless driving and driving while under the influence of intoxicants to the extent that her normal faculties were impaired.

Our consideration of the record leads us to conclude the petition is without merit.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

CROSS, C. J., McCAIN J., and MCDONALD, PARKER LEE, Associate Judge, concur.
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the quarterly report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Bertram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Rafik Moursalien, the
Controller of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

         By:   Daniel Bertram
               -------------------
               Daniel Bertram, CEO

         Dated: October 20, 2005


         By:   Rafik Moursalien
               ----------------------------
               Rafik Moursalien, Controller

         Dated: October 20, 2005

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-QSB to be signed on its behalf by its
duly authorized representatives.


                                          DATAMETRICS CORPORATION
                                          ------------------------
                                          /s/ Daniel Bertram
                                          Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name                                        Title                    Date
-------------------                 ------------------------    ---------------

/s/ Daniel Bertram                  Chief Executive Officer     October 20, 2005
-------------------
    Daniel Bertram

/s/ Rafik Moursalien                Controller                  October 20, 2005
-------------------
    Rafik Moursalien
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31101 Conference Calendar

JUVENTINO MUNOZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LORETTA WHYTE, Clerk, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana; CHARLES R. FULBRUGE, III, Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2309-K

- - - - - - - - - - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juventino Munoz (Louisiana prisoner # 352797) has filed a motion for permission to appeal, in forma pauperis (IFP), the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his complaint alleging violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962.No. 98-31101 -2- Munoz is BARRED by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) from proceeding IFP because, on at least three prior occasions while incarcerated, he

has brought an action or appeal in a United States Court that was dismissed for frivolousness, for maliciousness, or for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted and because he has not established that he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996); Munoz v. Jambon , 94-CV-4192-J (E.D. La.; Feb. 10, 1995), aff’d , No. 95-31304 (5th Cir.; Aug. 21, 1996); Munoz v. Simone , CA-95-2559-L (E.D. La.; Oct. 30, 1995), aff’d , No. 95- 31143 (5th Cir.; Aug. 20, 1996); Munoz v. Garrison , 95-CV-1691 (M.D. La.; Jan. 28, 1997). Accordingly, Munoz’s motion for IFP is DENIED and his appeal is DISMISSED. Should he wish to reinstate his appeal, Munoz has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district court.
IFP DENIED. APPEAL DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.1 - ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Technology Laboratories, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lewis M. Edwards, Chairman and Chief Technology Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ LEWIS M. EDWARDS
-----------------------
LEWIS M. EDWARDS,
CHAIRMAN,
EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT,
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER, AND
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
NOVEMBER 14, 2008
#### Tommy Lee PRYOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 21, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.