alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Mathematical Sciences; Notice of 
Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis in Mathematical 
Sciences (1204).
    Date and Time: March 10-12, 1997; 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 1020, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Joe W. Jenkins, Program Director, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1879.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals concerning the Operator 
Algebra/Operator Theory (OA/OT) Program, as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4149 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
AIRPOLLUTION CONTROL CONSTRUCTIONPERMIT REVISION

EI FACILITY NO: 111003090 TYPE: CONSTRUCTIONPERMITNO.: 14-POY-174-R1 ConstructionPermitforProcesses: B21, B22, P25, P26, P31, F99 In compliancewiththe provisions ofChapter 285, Wis. Stats., and Chapters NR400 to NR 499, Wis. Adm. Code, Name ofSource: WPL- ColumbiaEnergy Center Street Address: W8375 Murray Road, Pardeeville, Columbia County, Wisconsin Responsible Official, & Title: Jerald Lokenvitz, Plant Manager is authorized to modifY and initially operate two coal-fired utility boilers described in the plans and specifications dated September 23, 2014 through November 25, 2014, and May 26, 2015 through July 30, 2015 in conformity with the conditions herein. The authority to construct, modifY, replace and/or reconstruct any process covered in this Construction Permit expires thirty six (36) months from the date of issuance. This approved period to construct, modifY, replace and/or reconstruct may be extended for up to 18 months upon request for cause, prior to expiration, unless otherwise specified by this construction permit. The conditions ofthis construction permit are permanent and may only be revised through a revision ofthe construction permit or through the issuance ofa new construction permit. [s. 285.60(1), Wis. Stats.] Conditions ofthe construction permit marked with an asterisk (*) have been created outside ofthe Wisconsin's federally approved State ImplementationPlan (SIP) and are not federally enforceable. This authorization requires compliance by the permit holder with the emission limitations, monitoring requirements and otherterms and conditions set forth in Parts I and II hereof. Dated at Madison, Wisconsin 

# j , IL

# ;(l~u,

# &

. /0

. Za I

# s- " I , STATE OFWISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES

# Co~**~ ~'**  By

# ~Hart,Chief

# f~;c/;= Permits and Stationary Source Modeling Section
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Evans BROWN v. Charles FOTI, Jr., Sheriff.

No. 61031.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Evans Brown applying for remedial writs. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. It is ordered that relator’s application filed in this court be transferred to the district court for proper disposition by that court.
#### Titus R. WALTERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-727.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1974.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Roy S. Wood, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of a judgment and sentence of fifteen years in prison, which followed a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of third degree murder.

Appellant presents three points on appeal, however, our determination of this case makes it necessary to consider only appellant’s second point. His contention is well taken and requires reversal.

At the conclusion of the evidence placed before the jury, the court granted the state the right to opening and closing argument to the jury over the objection of appellant’s counsel. Upon cross-examination of Mr. Norman Lee, the director of the police crime laboratory for the Monroe County Sheriff’s Department, defense counsel inquired concerning tests run on a shirt. Counsel with the consent of the state attorney also had the shirt marked for identification.

Florida CrPR 3.250, 33 F.S.A., provides in part "... a defendant offering no testimony in his own behalf, except his own, shall be entitled to the concluding argument before the jury.” The rule supersedes former Fla.Stat. § 918.09, F.S.A. This language has been stated definitively to mean that a defendant who introduces no evidence in his own behalf, other than his own testimony, has a vested procedural right to the closing argument before the jury. Birge v. State, Fla.1957, 92 So.2d 819; Cagnina v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 577; Wyatt v. State, Fla.App.1972, 270 So.2d 47; Raysor v. State, Fla.App.1973, 272 So.2d 867.

The state argues that the record demonstrates that defense counsel clearly considered the shirt had been introduced into evidence and not solely marked for identifica*299tion. This court recently has stated that it should appear that evidence actually has been offered and admitted and not simply marked for identification. Alexander v. State, Fla.App., 288 So.2d 538, opinion filed January 8, 1974. Moreover, it is not proper for defense counsel to introduce evidence upon cross-examining one of the state’s witnesses. Birge v. State, supra.

Therefore, for the reasons stated and upon the authorities cited, the judgment and sentence appealed are reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Willie James POLE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-77.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 31, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Dorris P. FOREMAN, Appellant, v. Myron J. FOREMAN, Appellee.

No. 73-286.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 11, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 329-330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-46]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-76; RM-8770]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Nekoosa, Wisconsin

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Action in this document allots Channel 288A to Nekoosa, 
Wisconsin, in response to a petition filed by Lyle Robert Evans d/b/a 
The Radio Company. See 61 FR 18541, April 26, 1996. The coordinates for 
Channel 288A are 44-18-33 and 90-03-10. There is a site restriction 
11.9 kilometers (7.4 miles) west of the community. With this action 
this proceeding is terminated.

DATES: Effective February 10, 1997. The window period for filing 
applications for Channel 288A at Nekoosa, Wisconsin, will open on 
February 10, 1997, and close on March 13, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, MM Docket No. 96-76,

[[Page 330]]

adopted December 20, 1996, and released December 27, 1997. The full 
text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and 
copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference 
Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, NW, Washington, D.C. The complete 
text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractors, International Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, 
N.W., Suite 140, Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

    Part 73 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended 
as follows:

PART 73--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for Part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: Secs. 303, 48 Stat., as amended, 1082; 47 U.S.C. 154, 
as amended.


Sec. 73.202  [Amended]

    2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Wisconsin, 
is amended by adding Channel 288A at Nekoosa.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-46 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
Docket Number: FAA-2012-0672
EX10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

 This Amendment is made as of March 4, 2014 by and between Fidus Investment Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the
“Company”) and Fidus Investment Advisors, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Advisor are parties to that certain
Investment Advisory and Management Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of June 21, 2011; 
 WHERAS, the
Agreement remains in full force and effect; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Advisor desire to amend the Agreement as set
forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Advisor hereby agree as follows: 
 1.
Section 3(b)(ii) is restated in its entirety as follows: 
 (ii) The second part of the Incentive Fee (the
“Capital Gains Fee”) shall be calculated and payable in arrears as of the end of each fiscal year (or, upon termination of this Agreement pursuant to Section 9, as of the termination date) based on the Company’s net
capital gains, if any on a cumulative basis from the Company’s inception through the end of each fiscal year. For purposes of this Agreement, net capital gains are calculated by subtracting (A) the sum of the Company’s cumulative
aggregate realized capital losses and aggregated unrealized capital depreciation from (B) the Company’s cumulative aggregate realized capital gains, if any. If such amount is positive as of the end of the relevant fiscal year, then the
Capital Gains Fees for such year shall be equal to 20% of such amount, less the aggregate amount of Capital Gains Fees paid in all prior years. If such amount is negative, then there shall be no Capital Gains Fee for such year. If this Agreement
shall terminate as of a date that is not a fiscal-year end, the termination date shall be treated as though it were a fiscal-year end for purposes of calculated and paying a Capital Gains Fee. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first
above written. 
  

			
	FIDUS INVESTMENT CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ CARY L. SCHAEFER
	Name:	 	Cary L. Schaefer
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer


  

			
	FIDUS INVESMENT ADVISOR, LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ EDWARD H. ROSS
	Name:	 	Edward H. Ross
	Title:	 	Manager and Chief Executive Officer
----

**Exhibit        32.1**

| (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |

|   | /s/                  Harold F. Herron |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Harold                  F. Herron,    |   |
|   | President                             |   |
|   | August                  14, 2005      |   |
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20580

Mary K. Engle

Associate Director

{Date}

{Address}

Dear {Influencer}:

The Federal Trade Commission is the nation’s consumer protection agency. As part of 

our consumer protection mission, we work to educate marketers about their responsibilities

under truth-in-advertising laws and standards, including the FTC’s Endorsement Guides.

1

I am writing regarding your attached Instagram post endorsing {product or service}.

2

 

You posted a picture of {description of picture}. You wrote, “{quotation from Instagram 

post}.”

The FTC’s Endorsement Guides state that if there is a “material connection” between an 

endorser and the marketer of a product – in other words, a connection that might affect the 

weight or credibility that consumers give the endorsement – that connection should be clearly 

and conspicuously disclosed, unless the connection is already clear from the context of the 

communication containing the endorsement. Material connections could consist of a business or 

family relationship, monetary payment, or the provision of free products to the endorser.

The Endorsement Guides apply to marketers and endorsers. [If there is a material 

connection between you and {Marketer}, that connection should be clearly and conspicuously 

disclosed in your endorsements.] or [It appears that you have a business relationship with 

{Marketer}. Your material connection to that company should be clearly and conspicuously 

disclosed in your endorsements.] To make a disclosure both “clear” and “conspicuous,” you 

should use unambiguous language and make the disclosure stand out. Consumers should be able 

to notice the disclosure easily, and not have to look for it. For example, consumers viewing 

posts in their Instagram streams on mobile devices typically see only the first three lines of a 

longer post unless they click “more,” and many consumers may not click “more.” Therefore, 

you should disclose any material connection above the “more” button. In addition, where there 

are multiple tags, hashtags, or links, readers may just skip over them, especially where they 

appear at the end of a long post.

 1

 The Endorsement Guides are published in 16 C.F.R. Part 255.

2

 The post is available at {URL}.
{Influencer}

{Date}

Page 2

If you are endorsing the products or services of any marketers with whom you have a 

material connection, you may want to review the enclosed FTC staff publication, The FTC 

Endorsement Guides: What People are Asking. I’m also enclosing a copy of the Endorsement 

Guides themselves. (Both documents are available online at business.ftc.gov.)

If you have any questions, please contact Mamie Kresses at (202) 326-2070 or 

mkresses@ftc.gov. Thank you.

Very truly yours,

Mary K. Engle

Associate Director

Division of Advertising Practices
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES

//

...QR.IGINAL

cf,~~8/~ !,,¡, ~ i.' n._,.. 'J,,;, (J iUU&

õaS'9;¿5

In the Matter of

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Respondent.

ORDER REQUIRING EXPEDITED RESPONSE

On October 7,2009, Respondent submitted a Motion for a Court Order Allowing

Respondent to Review the Declaration of Douglas Gilespie. Pursuant to Commission

Rule 3.22(c), Complaint Counsel is hereby directed to fie a response to this motion by

5:00 p.m., October 14,2009.

ORDERED: :: ~ ~14 D. Michael Cha el

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Date: October 8, 2009

~

.~ ; ." -'1' "\
OVERVIEW OF 

COMPANION ANIMAL 

VETERINARY PRACTICE

Dr. Douglas G. Aspros

President

American Veterinary Medical 

Association (AVMA)

Companion / exotic animal 

practitioner
AVMA Membership

> 82,500 veterinarians

Approx. 83% of U.S. veterinarians

EOY 2011
Number of Pets Owned

Two-thirds (62.4%) of households 

owned one or more pets in 2011

AVMA U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographic Sourcebook, 2012
Companion Animal 

Practices

 Approximately 25-27,000 in 

the U.S. 
Diverse Practices

 Size of practice

 Number of veterinarians

 Single species to multiple species

 Rural/suburban/urban

 Mobile clinics to multi-site facilities

 Primary care to specialty care

 Routine care to emergency care

 Private to corporate to NFP to 

university
Companion Animal Practice
Total Veterinary Visits

Dogs & Cats

Millions

130.4

60.5

AVMA U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographic Sourcebook, 2012
Total Veterinary Visits

Birds

Millions

1.5

AVMA U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographic Sourcebook, 2012
Mean Veterinary Visit Per Year

All Pets

Per animal; AVMA U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographic Sourcebook, 2012
Veterinary Pharmacology 

Education

Veterinary education: 4y of 

post-Baccalaureate education

DVM or VMD degree granted

Programs accredited by the 

AVMA Council on Education 

under USDE

 Standards for Accreditation

 Must meet or exceed Standards

 Standards include curriculum
Veterinarian-Client-PatientRelationship (VCPR)

 Sufficient knowledge of 

patient (examination)

 Veterinarian advises client 

(diagnose/prescribe)

 Client has elected to 

follow the veterinarian’s 

advice 

Written records are kept

 Information/options for 

emergency care are 

provided
Pharmacy Revenues as a % 

of Business Revenues

Rx Non-Rx

% %

Companion Animal 

(exclusive)

17.1 5.5

AVMA Biennial Economic Survey, 2009 
Services at Most Recent 

Visit (dogs)

AVMA U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographic Sourcebook, 2012
Services at Most Recent 

Visit (cats)

AVMA U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographic Sourcebook, 2012
Services at Most Recent 

Visit (birds)

AVMA U.S. Pet Ownership & Demographic Sourcebook, 2012
Supply Chain to Veterinary 

Practices

Manufacturer

Distributor

Veterinarian
Regulation and Oversight

State veterinary practice acts

State veterinary medical boards

 Enforce state veterinary practice act

 Examine prospective licensees

 Set requirements

 Grant/revoke licenses

 Define unprofessional conduct

 Investigate breaches

 Discipline violators
Receiving Complaints 

State veterinary licensing board

State veterinary medical 

association

State attorney general

State department of consumer 

affairs

Local or state courts 
Governing Statutes and 

Regulation 

 State pharmacy acts and boards

 Licensure, control, and regulation 

of pharmacy sites and professional 

practices

 State laws give licensed 

veterinarians authority to dispense 

drugs to their patients with VCPR

 U.S. Food & Drug Administration

 Drug Enforcement Administration
Primum Non Nocere

Veterinarians 

dispense drugs to 

ensure the health 

and welfare of their 

animal patients.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4329]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 50

[AD-FRL-5692-2]
RIN 2060-AE66


National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter: 
Proposed Appendix L Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Supplemental Information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to inform the public that EPA is 
considering minor technical changes to the proposed Federal Reference 
Method (FRM) for PM<INF>2.5 sampling published on December 13, 1996. 
The nature of these changes include improvements in the inlet assembly 
to prevent precipitation inside the inlet and reduce solar heating, and 
other miscellaneous modifications to provide more reliable sampling 
capability. There may be unanticipated modifications, which will be 
described in the docket and elsewhere. A description of these changes 
will be placed in Docket No. A-95-54 and, when available posted on 
EPA's Technical Transfer Network/Bulletin Board System (TTN/BBS). If 
EPA concludes that it is necessary to evaluate additional changes, 
these will be placed in the docket at a later date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions regarding the FRM, 
contact Neil H. Frank at (919) 541-5560. For general questions 
regarding the NAAQS contact Patrica Koman at (919) 431-5170.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Docket. Docket No. A-95-54, containing supporting information used 
in developing the aforementioned changes in the FRM hardware and/or 
method is available for public inspection and copying between 8 a.m. 
and 5:30 p.m. on weekdays, at the U. S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460. A reasonable fee may be 
charged for copying.
    Documents Available Electronically. An electronic version of this 
action as well as the December 13, 1996 Federal Register proposal 
notice will be available for download from EPA's TTN/BBS. The service 
is free, except for the cost of a telephone call. Dial (919) 541-5742 
for data transfer of up to 14,400 bits per second. This information is 
available from both the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) technical area 
and the Ambient Monitoring Technology Information Center (AMTIC) 
technical area. The TTN is also available via the Internet, TTN 2000 
CAAA Internet Web site at www address (http://134.67.104.12/html/caaa/
caaa.html#CAAM) and the AMTIC at www address (134.67.104.12/html/amtic/
amtic.html#AMOl). For more information on the TTN, contact the systems 
operator at (919) 541-5384.

    Dated: February 14, 1997.
Mary D. Nichols,
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 97-4329 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M