alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7984-7985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-61, RM-9010]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Superior, MT

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by 
Mountain Tower Broadcasting proposing the allotment of Channel 298A to 
Superior, Montana, as that community's first local broadcast service. 
The coordinates for Channel 298A are 47-11-30 and 114-53-18. Canadian 
concurrence will be requested for the allotment of Channel 298A at 
Superior.


[[Page 7985]]


DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 7, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 22, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: Victor A. Michael Jr., President, 
Mountain Tower Broadcasting, c/o Magic City Media, 1912 Capitol Avenue, 
Suite 300, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-61, adopted February 7, 1997, 
and released February 14, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-4290 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
#### William C. BRADLEY v. Riley C. LEMOINE.

No. 9282.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

May 14, 1973.

William C. Bradley, Bradley & Thompson, Baker, for appellant.

Joseph A. Gladney, Baton Rouge, for ap-pellee.

Before LANDRY, TUCKER and PICKETT, JJ.

TUCKER, Judge.

The plaintiff, William C. Bradley, brought this suit to recover the balance of an attorney’s fee in the sum of $764.20 allegedly due him for representing the defendant, Riley C. Lemoine, in proceedings designed to result in a separation from bed and board from his wife. The trial court rejected the plaintiff’s suit on the merits, and from this judgment the plaintiff has appealed. After the case was heard on the merits the defendant filed an exception of no right of action directed to the proposition that the plaintiff was a member of a partnership engaged in the practice of law, composed of him and Paul T. Thompson. The defendant on appeal reurges the legal efficacy of this exception. The evidence adduced at the trial clearly shows that such attorney’s fee, if any, was an indebtedness due the partnership of Bradley & Thompson.

This suit is brought individually by the plaintiff and not in the name of the partnership. A partnership is a separate and distinct entity from its individual members, and under the provisions of LSA-C.C.P. Art. 688 a suit seeking recovery of an indebtedness due the partnership must be brought in the name of the partnership, and not in the name of an individual member thereof. See also 21 La.Law Rev. 29.

*149The exception of no right of action will be maintained, and for this reason the judgment of the trial court, dismissing plaintiff’s suit will be affirmed at his costs.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.18


  


Miller Industries, Inc.


8503 Hilltop Drive


Ooltewah, TN 37363




 


November 27, 2013


 


VIA EMAIL


Mr. William G. Miller


101 S.E. 23rd Avenue


Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301


 


Re:  Employment and Change in Control Agreements


 


Dear Mr. Miller:


 


At its meeting on November 4, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company made the determination to terminate the automatic renewing feature of your Employment Agreement, as  amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008.  As such, I have been directed to provide you with Notice of such action.


 


Accordingly, effective December 31, 2013, under paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement between you and the Company, as amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008 the Term of the Agreement shall be extended three years.


 


All other terms of the Agreements shall remain unchanged.


 


Please acknowledge receipt of this letter by signing in the space provided below and return to me by email.




 



	 	 	 
Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
/s/ Frank Madonia

	 
	 	 	 
Frank Madonia,

	 
	 	 	 
General Counsel

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
FM/jf

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
Receipt acknowledged

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
/s/ William G. Miller

	 	 	 
	 
William G. Miller
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of BJ Services Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, T. M. Whichard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|   |  |                        
|-- |  | -----------------------
|BY |  | /s/ T.M. Whichard      
|   |  | T. M. Whichard         
|   |  | Chief Financial Officer
|   |  | January 26, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 2004, hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant.



                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                              /s/: Richard Banakus
                              --------------------
                                 Richard Banakus
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                November 10, 2004
Highly Confidential

To: 

From: 

Cc:

Subject: Thermal testing – TGA
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Restoration Hardware, Inc.
Corte Madera, California

We
consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-58684, 333-45638, 333-66065, 333-72288, 333-81430
and 333-103639 of Restoration Hardware, Inc, on Form S-8 and Registration Statements No. 333-62178, 333-70624 and 333-74668 of
Restoration Hardware, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated May 2, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
restatement described in Note 17) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Restoration Hardware, Inc. for the year ended February 1, 2003.

Our
audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Restoration Hardware, Inc. listed in
Item 15(a)(2). The financial statement schedule is the responsibly of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such
financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

San
Francisco, California
May 2, 2003

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Dan K.
Wassong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









/S/ DAN K. WASSONG
------------------
Dan K. Wassong
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2003

<PAGE>
259 La. 796

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Joseph SALISBERRY v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51796.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 13, 1971.

In re: Joseph Salisberry, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. Although the petitioner’s *retained*counsel may have neglected to perfect an appeal, this does not amount to State action depriving him of the effective assistance of counsel and thus presents no valid claim of unconstitutional denial of right. Cf., Beto v. Martin, 396 F.2d 432 (5 Cir. 1968).

SANDERS, J., concurs in the denial of the writ.
ex109.htm






Exhibit 10.9


Schedule of Board Fees












The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of Lakeland Financial Corporation adopted the following fee schedule effective January 1, 2014:


 



	
Annual Director Retainer:

	  	
$

	
25,000

	  	  
	
Annual Audit Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
35,000

	  	  
	
Annual Lead Director and Governance Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
35,000

	  	  
	
Annual Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
30,000

	  	  
	
Annual Corporate Risk Committee Chairman Retainer

	  	
$

	
30,000

	  	  
	
Board Meeting Fee:

	  	
$

	
1,000

	  	
per meeting


	
Committee Meeting Fee:

	  	
$

	
1,000

	  	
per meeting


	
Annual stock grant:

	  	  	
1,250

	  	
shares
H. R. 7088 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 111 James 

Street in Reidsville, Georgia, as the ‘‘Senator Jack Hill Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SENATOR JACK HILL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Senator Jack Hill Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Senator Jack Hill Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### James H. McCORMICK, Petitioner, v. The BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, Florida, a public corporation, Respondent.

No. 73-609.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area #2930]


Wisconsin (And Contiguous Counties in Ilinois); Declaration of 
Disaster Loan Area

    Green County and the contiguous counties of Dane, Iowa, Lafayette, 
and Rock in Wisconsin, and Stephenson and Winnebago Counties in 
Illinois constitute a disaster area as a result of damages caused by 
severe storms and flooding which occurred on July 17 and 18, 1996. 
Applications for loans for physical damage as a result of this disaster 
may be filed until the close of business on April 11, 1997 and for 
economic injury until the close of business on November 10, 1997 at the 
address listed below:

U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area 2 Office, One 
Baltimore Place, Suite 300, Atlanta, GA 30308

or other locally announced locations.
    The interest rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Percent  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:                                                    
  HOMEOWNERS WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE...............        7.625
  HOMEOWNERS WITHOUT CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE............        3.875
  BUSINESSES WITH CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE...............        8.000
  BUSINESSES AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS WITHOUT CREDIT                
   AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE.....................................        4.000
  OTHERS (INCLUDING NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS) WITH CREDIT               
   AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE.....................................        7.125
For Economic Injury:                                                    
  BUSINESSES AND SMALL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES WITHOUT                
   CREDIT AVAILABLE ELSEWHERE..............................        4.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The numbers assigned to this disaster for physical damage are 
293006 for Wisconsin and 293106 for Illinois. For economic injury the 
numbers are 937600 for Wisconsin and 937700 for Illinois.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008.)

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
Philip Lader,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-4024 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
ex10-30.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.30




 



FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT







THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“First Amendment”) to that certain employment agreement entitled Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2014 between CytRx Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Employer”) and Benjamin S. Levin, an individual and resident of the State of California (“Employee”) (the “Employment Agreement”), is made and is effective as of March 4, 2014.







WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement under which Employee shall continue to serve on a full-time basis as Employer’s General Counsel, Senior Vice President and Secretary on the terms set forth in the Employment Agreement and this First Amendment.







NOW THEREFORE, upon the above premises, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:







1. Section 4. Term. The first sentence is amended to read “The term (the “Term”) of Employee’s employment hereunder shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire on December 31, 2015, unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 6.”







Upon execution by Employee and Employer, this First Amendment will be made a part of the Employment Agreement and incorporated by reference therein. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement not affected by the terms of this First Amendment shall remain in full force and in the case of conflict between the Employment Agreement and this First Amendment, the terms of this First Amendment shall take precedence.







This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment is executed as of the day and year first above written.












“EMPLOYER”







CytRx Corporation, a Delaware Corporation












By: /s/ Steven A. Kriegsman__________________________________


Name: Steven A. Kriegsman


Title: President and Chief Executive Officer












“EMPLOYEE”












By: /s/ Benjamin S. Levin__________________________________


       Benjamin S. Levin
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(a)

                         Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors,
Nexell Therapeutics Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-3106 and No. 333-15693) on Form S-8 and registration statements
(No. 333-25469 and No. 333-78175) on Form S-3 of Nexell Therapeutics Inc. of our
report dated February 4, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Nexell Therapeutics Inc. and subsidiaries (formerly VIMRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)
as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and the related schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of
Nexell Therapeutics Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP
Orange County, California
March 29, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,576
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                       156
<INVENTORY>                                     12,138
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,387
<PP&E>                                          25,944
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,848
<SALES>                                         13,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,592
<CGS>                                            9,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,803
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     87
<INCOME-TAX>                                        35
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 52
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        52
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
p. 

~!'A- 1-~GL-oPPT--~oo~ - 003.3 

Jerry Cook To Catherine Roman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

<jcook@cpc-us.com> 

cc Charles Willis <c.willis@case-labs.com> 

07/24/2006 09:38 AM 

Good Morning, Catherine; 

bcc 

Subject 84-65-1, under final TSCA test rule 

We have one more testing issue which I hope you can address for us . ASTM E324 is 

the method specified for melting point determination in the March 16, 2006 final rule 

under TSCA Section 4. 

This method is stated by ASTM to be applicable for organic chemicals whose melting 

points without decomposition fall between 30 and 250°C. The attached pdf file of a 

page from the ASTM website also states that, "This test method is not directly 

applicable to opaque materials" . 9,10-Anthrace nedione, CAS # 84-65-1, is reported in 

the open literature as having a melting point of 286 degrees C (Handbook of Chemistry 

and Physics, CRC). 

In addition, this is stated in E324 to be a relative measure of melting point. The method 

states, "This method determines initial and final melting points by a relative procedure, 

utilizing a standard sample that has been assigned jointly accepted melting point values 

by the concerned parties (such as a supplier and a consumer,". We do not possess a 

standard sample as described in ASTM E324. 

The laboratory conducting the melting point determination for us says that it is capable 

of providing a melting point determination for 9,10-Anthracenedione utilizing the 

Capillary Melting Point Apparatus and Melting Point Capillary Tubes described in ASTM 

E324. Chemical Products Corporation requests that we be allowed to provide a melting 

point determined "by the method of ASTM E324" which is not a relative value related to 

a standard, but it rather an observed absolute melting point value for the 

9,10-Anthracenedione test article utilizing the ASTM E324 test method. 

Thanks and Best Regards, 

Jerry 

ASTM E324-99 Test Method for Relative MP.pdf 

~ .' . .. 

CONTAINS NO CBI 

Melting Point determination for 9,10-Anthracenedione, CAS # 

-~~~1 

r *n 1 

G7
#### Mrs. Rose Lee Miles ROCCAFORTE v. Arthur C. LEWIS, Jr., Ind. & as Trustee, et al.

No. 54338.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 15, 1974.

In re: Mrs. Rose Lee Miles Roccaforte applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 286 So.2d 490.

It is ordered that the' writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.