alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sypris Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, in his capacity as an officer of Sypris Solutions, Inc., that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                         
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 30, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey T. Gill                     
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Jeffrey T. Gill                         
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer     
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 30, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Brian A. Lutes                      
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Brian A. Lutes                          
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sypris Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Sypris Solutions,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4570]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEFENSE NUCLEAR FACILITIES SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b), notice is hereby given of the Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board's (Board) meeting described below.

    Time and Date: 9:00 a.m., March 19, 1997.
    Place: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, Public 
Hearing Room, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 
20004.
    Matters to be Considered: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board will reconvene and continue the open meeting conducted on 
February 5, 1997, regarding the status of DOE's Implementation Plan 
for Board Recommendation 95-2, Integrated Safety Management. 
Specifically, the Board will be given status reports by DOE relative 
to the Department's efforts to improve the technical expertise 
necessary to review and implement safety management systems, 
including establishment of a Core Technical group, and the 
development of guidance for implementation of the Safety Management 
System.
    Contact Person for More Information: Robert M. Andersen, General 
Counsel, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana 
Avenue, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004, (800) 788-4016. This is 
a toll-free number.
    Supplementary Information: The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety 
Board reserves its right to further schedule and otherwise regulate 
the course of this meeting, to recess, reconvene, postpone or 
adjourn the meeting, and otherwise exercise its authority under the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

    Dated: February 20, 1997.
John T. Conway,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 97-4570 Filed 2-20-97; 10:38 am]
BILLING CODE 3670-01-M
Exhibit
32.4

SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

In accordance with Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer
of Registrant hereby certifies to his knowledge that this amended annual report
of Registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.

|Date: February 1, 2006 | /s/
R. Brent Lenczycki, CPAR. Brent Lenczycki, CPA
 Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial
and  Accounting Officer)
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this
written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
will be retained by Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document.
United States Position 

Botswana – Morupule B Generation and Transmission Project 

AfDB October 28; World Bank October 29, 2009 

This project is being considered at a time when the public debate as to whether MDBs 

should be lending for any coal power generation is intensifying with the approach of the 

Copenhagen climate meeting. 

The United States position on this project is strongly influenced by the severe national 

energy security threat that Botswana is facing, which could be damaging to its national 

economy, unless there is urgent action. This kind of shock leaves few options. 

Renewables take time to develop, and energy efficiency measures can only squeeze out 

so much. 

The United States agrees that the project uses the best available technology for its size. 

In addition, the U.S. welcomes the work of the MDBs with the Botswana authorities on 

developing a number of actions that will potentially reduce the carbon intensity of the 

sector, including by funding feasibility studies for concentrated solar power, coal bed 

methane, and carbon capture storage. However, most of these actions are very 

preliminary and some years off. The United States hopes the Botswana authorities will 

commit to the shutdown of Morupule A by 2020 or earlier. 

This project also triggers a number of significant safeguards. The United States is 

satisfied that the issues raised in the environmental impact assessment have been 

comprehensively addressed in the environmental management plan. The position is also 

based on the loan covenants relating to ensuring air quality monitoring and the water 

collection system. 

In conclusion, the United States supports this project as an exceptional national 

emergency response to a severe supply shock, and is pleased that the World Bank and 

African Development Bank have used this opportunity to re-engage with Botswana to 

develop options for pursuing a low-carbon growth strategy. Bringing low carbon energy 

options to fruition based on domestic resources will also help to meet Botswana’s energy 

security needs.
#### Syble June FALKNER, Appellant, v. MIAMI JAI-ALAI, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-473.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 28, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Vincent M.
Thielen, principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

2.   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report.

March 12, 2004

                                                   /s/ VINCENT M. THIELEN
                                              --------------------------------
                                                      Vincent M. Thielen
                                                 principal financial officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Office for Women's Services; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Advisory Committee for Women's Services of the Substance 
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in February 
1997.
    The meeting of the Advisory Committee for Women's Services will 
include a discussion of policy and program issues relating to women's 
substance abuse and mental health service needs; the SAMHSA fiscal year 
1998 budget; resolutions adopted at the Committee's September meeting; 
consideration of September meeting minutes; and other policy issues.
    A summary of the meeting and/or a roster of committee members may 
be obtained from: Pamela J. McDonnell, Executive Secretary, Advisory 
Committee for Women's Services, Office for Women's Services, SAMHSA, 
Parklawn Building, Room 13-99, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 
20857, Telephone: (301) 443-5184.
    Substantive information may be obtained from the contact whose name 
and telephone number is listed below.

    Committee Name: Advisory Committee for Women's Services.
    Meeting Date(s): February 24, 1997.
    Place: Room 12-94, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857.
    Open: February 24, 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Contact: Pamela J. McDonnell, Room 13-99, Parklawn Building, 
Telephone: (301) 443-5184.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to resolve pending issues before a 
full meeting can be scheduled.

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
Jeri Lipov,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-3586 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
#### Leo HENZEL, Appellant, v. Edwin GOLSTEIN and S.W.F.P. Company, a Florida Corporation, Appellees.

No. 76-1165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 13, 1977.

*825E. C. Watkins, Jr., Tampa, for appellant.

Hugh F. Quinn, South Miami, for appel-lees.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and HUBBART, JJ.

HUBBART, Judge.

By this appeal we are asked to review a trial court order dismissing an action for lack of prosecution. The appellant contends that he was given inadequate notice for the hearing on the appellee’s motion to dismiss the action for lack of prosecution. We agree and reverse.

Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(e)1 contemplates that a party should have sufficient notice for a hearing on an adverse motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution to allow him to file a written pleading no later than five working days2 before such hearing showing good cause why the action should remain pending. In the instant case, the appellant had only one working day’s notice prior to the hearing on the motion to dismiss, which notice was clearly inadequate. We, accordingly, reverse the order of dismissal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

1

. “All actions in which it appears on the face of the record that no activity by filing of pleadings, order of court or otherwise has occurred for a period of one year shall be dismissed by the court on its own motion or on motion of any interested person, whether a party to the action or not, after reasonable notice to the parties, unless a party shows good cause in writing, at least five days before the hearing on the motion, why the action should remain pending. Mere inaction for a period of less than one year shall not be sufficient cause for dismissal for failure to prosecute.” Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.420(e).

2

. “In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these rules, by order of court or by any applicable statute, the day of the act, event or default from which the designated period of time begins to run shall not be included. The last day of the period so computed shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. When the period of time prescribed or allowed is less than seven days, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation.” Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.090(a).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8240-8241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5692-7]


Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the 
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee (CAAAC) on November 19, 1990 to 
provide independent advice and counsel to EPA on policy issues 
associated with

[[Page 8241]]

implementation of the Clean Air Act of 1990. The Committee advises on 
economic, environmental, technical, scientific, and enforcement policy 
issues.

OPEN MEETING NOTICE: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. App. 2 Section 10(a)(2), 
notice is hereby given that the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee will 
hold its next open meeting on Thursday, April 10, 1997 from 8:30 a.m. 
to 3:30 p.m. at Fairview Park Marriott Hotel, 3111 Fairview Park Dr., 
Falls Church, Virginia. Seating will be available on a first come, 
first served basis. The Permits/NSR/Toxics Integration Subcommittee, 
the Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovations Subcommittee, the 
Linking Transportation and Air Quality Concerns Subcommittee and the 
Climate Change Subcommittee will conduct meetings on Wednesday, April 
9, 1997, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Subcommittee meeting times may 
change at the discretion of the co-chairs.

INSPECTION OF COMMITTEE DOCUMENTS: The committee agenda and any 
documents prepared for the meeting will be publicly available at the 
meeting. Thereafter, these documents, together with the CAAAC meeting 
minutes, will be available by contacting Committee DFO Paul Rasmussen 
at (202) 260-6877.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning this meeting of the CAAAC, 
please contact Paul Rasmussen, Office of Air and Radiation, US EPA 
(202) 260-6877, fax (202) 260-4185, or by mail at US EPA, Office of Air 
and Radiation (Mail Code 6102), Washington, DC 20460. If you would like 
to receive an agenda for the CAAAC meeting, please leave your fax 
number on Mr. Rasmussen's voice mail and it will be forwarded to you.

    Dated: February 14, 1997.
Mary D. Nichols,
Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 97-4496 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 4, 2012

s0827

Order 

September 4, 2012

145177

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145177

COA: 303426

Kent CC: 09-010641-FH

CONTRAIL YVETTE STONE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JASON BARNARD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

U.S. GOVERNMENT,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 14-55771

D.C. No. 5:14-cv-00781-GW-JC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 24, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Jason Barnard appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a Thirteenth Amendment claim. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a sua sponte dismissal for

failure to state a claim. Barrett v. Belleque, 544 F.3d 1060, 1061 (9th Cir. 2008). 

FILED

MAR 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Barnard’s action as frivolous because

Barnard’s claims lacked any arguable basis in law or fact. See Neitzke v. Williams,

490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (a “frivolous” claim lacks an arguable basis either in law

or in fact; the “term ‘frivolous’ . . . embraces not only the inarguable legal

conclusion, but also the fanciful factual allegation”); see also Sparling v. Hoffman

Constr. Co., 864 F.2d 635, 638 (9th Cir. 1988) (court may sua sponte dismiss for

failure to state a claim without notice or an opportunity to respond where plaintiff

cannot possibly win relief). Moreover, Barnard failed to show that the United

States has waived its sovereign immunity from suit. See United States v. Mitchell,

463 U.S. 206, 212 (1983) (“It is axiomatic that the United States may not be sued

without its consent and that the existence of consent is a prerequisite for

jurisdiction.”); Jachetta v. United States, 653 F.3d 898, 904 (9th Cir. 2011) (§ 1983

does not waive sovereign immunity).

Barnard’s motion to file a substitute brief, filed on October 23, 2014, is

granted. The Clerk shall file the opening brief received October 6, 2014.

AFFIRMED.

2 14-55771
#### Russell B. JONES, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-836.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 29, 1971.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Wm. Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit** **32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Gregory L. Burns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ GREGORY L. BURNS        |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Gregory L. Burns            |
| *Chief Executive Officer*** |
| March 14, 2007         |
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-348]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-210-000]


Honeoye Storage Corporation; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

January 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 30, 1996 Honeoye Storage Corporation 
(Honeoye) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 2, revised tariff sheets to be effective January 1, 1997.
    Honeoye states that the purpose of the filing is to reflect a 
change in address and to convert Honeoye's volume 2 from a volumetric 
(MCF) to a thermal energy basis (MMBTU). Honeoye states that there will 
be no change in rates and revenues under the proposed revisions.
    Honeoye requests waiver of the Commission's Regulations to the 
extent necessary to permit the tariff sheets to become effective 
January 1, 1997.
    Honeoye states that copies of the filing are being mailed to 
Honeoye's customers and interested state regulatory commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protests with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with the Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of Commission's Regulations. Protests will 
be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action 
to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-348 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M