alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8991-8992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA'')

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 C.F.R. 50.7, 38 FR 
19029, and 42 U.S.C. 9622(d) notice is hereby given that a proposed 
consent decree in United States v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., Civil 
Action No. 97-CV-136, was lodged on January 31, 1997 with the United 
States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The 
Consent Decree addresses the hazardous waste contamination at the 
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Superfund Site (the ``Site'') in the 
City of Saratoga Springs, Saratoga County, New York. The Consent Decree 
requires Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (`'NMPC'') to implement the 
remedial action selected by the Environmental Protection Agency in the 
Record of Decision dated September, 1995. Additionally, NMPC is 
required to reimburse the United States $874,080.04, in U.S. EPA past 
costs at the Site and pay EPA's oversight costs at the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., DOJ Ref. #90-11-3-1570.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 231 James T. Foley Courthouse, 445 Broadway, 
Albany, New York 12207; Region II; Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007; and at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street,

[[Page 8992]]

N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, please 
enclose a check in the amount of $26.25 for the Consent Decree and 
$41.50 for the attachments to the Consent Decree (25 cents per page 
reproduction costs), payable to the Consent Decree Library.

Bruce Gelber,
Deputy Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-4874 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Case Number 02-15-00013-CV 

IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

at Fort Worth 

__________________________________________________________________ 

HAROLD A. RUMZEK, 

Appellant, 

v. 

BRYAN D. LUCCHESI, 

Appellee. 

__________________________________________________________________ 

From Cause No. 352-265227-13 in the 352nd Judicial District Court 

of Tarrant County 

__________________________________________________________________ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF 

LEAD COUNSEL 

__________________________________________________________________ 

WALTERS, BALIDO & CRAIN, L.L.P. 

Gregory R. Ave

State Bar No. 01448900 

10440 North Central Expressway 

Meadow Park Tower, Suite 1500 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Telephone Number (214) 347-8310 

Facsimile Number (214) 347-8311 

Greg.ave@wbclawfirm.com 

January 22, 2015 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE 

ACCEPTED

02-15-00013-CV

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

1/22/2015 2:47:08 PM

DEBRA SPISAK

CLERK

 FILED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 01/22/2015 2:47:08 PM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
1 

TO THE HONORABLE FORT WORTH COURT OF APPEALS:

 COMES NOW, Gregory R. Ave, a partner in the law firm of Walters, 

Balido & Crain, L.L.P., pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

6.1(c), and files this Notice of Appearance and Designation of Lead Counsel 

for Appellee Bryan D. Lucchesi. (“Appellee”). Accordingly, counsel for 

Appellee requests the Court take notice and that all correspondence, 

notices, briefs, pleadings, motions, orders, opinions, judgments, and other 

communications be directed to the undersigned. Pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 6.1(c), the following information is being provided 

regarding lead counsel: 

Gregory R. Ave 

Texas State Bar No. 01448900 

Walters, Balido & Crain, L.L.P. 

Meadow Park Tower, Suite 1500 

10440 North Central Expressway 

Dallas, Texas 75231 

Telephone Number: (214) 347-8310 

Facsimile Number: (214) 347-8311 

greg.ave@wbclawfirm.com. 
2 

 Respectfully submitted, 

WALTERS, BALIDO & CRAIN, L.L.P.

 By: /s/ Gregory R. Ave 

 Gregory R. Ave 

 Texas State Bar No. 01448900 

 greg.ave@wbclawfirm.com

 10440 North Central Expressway 

 Meadow Park Tower, Suite 1500 

 Dallas, Texas 75231 

 (2l4) 347-8310 

 (2l4) 347-8311 (facsimile) 

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE 

BRYAN D. LUCCHESI 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 On January 22, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

sent to opposing counsel of record as follows: 

Ernest (Skip) Reynolds III, Esquire Via E-serve

Law Offices of Ernest (Skip) Reynolds III 

314 Main Street, Suite 202 

Fort Worth, Texas 76102-7423 

 

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT 

HAROLD A. RUMZEK 

 /s/ Gregory R. Ave 

 Gregory R. Ave
EXHIBIT 32.3

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2004, hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant.



                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                              /s/ WILLIAM A. LAUBY
                              --------------------
                                William A. Lauby
                             Chief Financial Officer
                                  May 13, 2004


                                       23
Exhibit 10.10 


 


Blinkx Video Advantage Terms


 


BVA will pay 50% of the Net Revenues (as defined below)
of all advertising revenue generated from the content on a publisher's video widgets, if any, and deducting any applicable VAT,
sales, or other tax, recognized by blinkx and attributable to advertisements displayed in the widgets. Payments will be made Net
30 from collections of the Net Revenue. "Net Revenue" shall mean total advertising revenue recognized by blinkx from
the sale of advertisements less costs in connection with the sale and display of such advertising (including, without limitation,
sales commissions, revenue share for content providers, ad serving costs, and other expenses and fees) and refunds, rebates, chargebacks,
claw backs from advertisers, etc.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-09-00566- CV

David Fe rnea, Appellant

v. Mer rill Lyn ch P ierc e F enner & Sm ith, Inc., App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 200 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-0 9-0 0219 5, H ONO RAB LE JO HN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESI DING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N
On J uly 3, 2014, the parties filed their joint status repor t on aba tement, reque sting that the abate ment of this appea l continue until October 3, 2014, due to ong oing settlement neg otiations. The reque st is g rante d, and the appeal will rema in abate d until further order of this Court. The parties shall submit either a joint status repor t c oncer ning the status of settlement neg otiations or a motion to di smiss the appe al on or be fore October 3, 2014.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Puryear and Pember

ton Abated Filed: Jul y

10, 2014
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 1041

_____________________________
R OBERT W ADE E RICKSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. J. Scott Duncan , Judge

. September 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Robert Wade Erickson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000611 10-APR-2019 09:09 AM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7906
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LEROY CURTIS RICHARDSON, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-238-WS, CA-94-558-6) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcia Gail Shein, LAW OFFICE OF MARCIA G. SCHEIN, P.C., Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellant. David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Leroy Curtis Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court's decision denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) mo tion. Richardsonclaims his trial attorney rendered ineffective assistance by failing to inform him of the consequences of his plea agreement andthat the district court improperly computed his sentence. The ineffective assistance claims are without merit, as the record reveals that Richardson was informed of the consequences of his plea by his attorney, the plea agreement, and the court. See Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Blackledge v. Allison , 431 U.S. 63 (1977). Additionally, Richardson waived his right to appeal the sentencing claims by entering into the plea agreement, which waived his right to direct appeal. See Stone v. Powell , 428 U.S. 465 (1976). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's decision. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4990]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than March 14, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Randall J. Hendricks, Elsie, Nebraska, and Warren Orr, North 
Platte, Nebraska; each to acquire an additional 26.92 percent, for a 
total of 50 percenteach, of the voting shares of Elsie, Inc., Elsie, 
Nebraska, and thereby indirectly acquire Commercial State Bank, Elsie, 
Nebraska.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Mary Lois Whittenburg Lockhart, as Trustee of the Grace and Roy 
Whittenburg Trusts, Amarillo, Texas; to acquire an additional 63.51 
percent, for a total of 64.16 percent of the voting shares of Amarillo 
Western Bancshares, Inc., Amarillo, Texas, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Western National Bank, Amarillo, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 24, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-4990 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
**Exhibit 31.B**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Charles A. Braun, certify that:

 

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Hector Communications Corporation;

 

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)             evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluations; and

 

c)              disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a)              all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: March 27, 2006 |
|---------------------------|
|                      |
| /s/ Charles A. Braun      |   |   |
| Charles A. Braun          |
| Chief Financial Officer   |

 

89

----
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ABOUT THE PROPOSED RULEMAKING

FOR

ELECTRIC MOTOR ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS

U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss its proposed 

energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial electric motors. DOE will 

present the data, analyses, and methodologies it is using in the rulemaking process, and 

energy efficiency levels proposed. This public meeting will provide opportunities for 

questions, comments, and discussion from those present. Throughout the rulemaking 

process, DOE invites written comments, information, and data from all interested parties.

Agenda

9:00 – 9:05 am Welcome, Introductions, Public Meeting Norms

Doug Brookman

9:05 – 9:15 am Opening Remarks, Background, Regulatory History

Jim Raba

9:15 – 9:45 am Opening Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

9:45 – 10:15 am Market and Technology Assessment

Brian Coffey

10:15 – 10:30 am Break

10:30 – 11:30 am Engineering Analysis

Brian Coffey

11:30 am – 12:00 pm Markups and Energy Use Analysis; and Life Cycle Cost 

Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

12:00 – 1:00 pm Lunch
1:00 – 1:30 pm Shipments, National Impact, and Regulatory Impact, 

Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

1:30 – 1:45pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Hayden Cook

1:45– 2:00 pm Environmental Impact, Utility Impact, and 

Employment Impact Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

2:00– 2:15 pm Summary of Results and Proposed Standards

Sanaee Iyama

2:15 – 2:40 pm Closing Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

2:40 – 2:45 pm Closing Remarks

Jim Raba

2:45 pm Adjourn
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7476 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7476

   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report to 
   Congress on programs to notify veterans of potential exposure to 
  certain herbicide agents outside of Vietnam, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2020

   Mr. Vela introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report to 
   Congress on programs to notify veterans of potential exposure to 
  certain herbicide agents outside of Vietnam, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPORT ON OUTREACH BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              REGARDING POTENTIAL EXPOSURE OF VETERANS TO HERBICIDE 
              AGENTS.

    (a) Report Required.--No later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall submit 
to Congress a report detailing outreach activities regarding the 
potential exposure of veterans to certain herbicide agents at sites 
outside of Vietnam.
    (b) Spanish Language Outreach.--The report required by subsection 
(a) shall include information on whether outreach activities are being 
conducted in Spanish.
    (c) Herbicide Agent Defined.--For the purposes of this Act, the 
term ``herbicide agent'' means a chemical in an herbicide used or 
stored by the United States and allied military forces for the purposes 
of military operations or testing during the period starting on May 1, 
1945 and ending on June 10, 1977.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene E. BUTLER, Jr.

No. 60835.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 18, 1977.

In re: Eugene E. Butler, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ granted. Hearing ordered to fix bail.

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents from the granting of writ.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7262 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified opportunity 

funds to invest in community development financial institutions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. MEEKS (for himself, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. GREEN of Texas, 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. GALLEGO, and Mr. CRIST) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified opportunity funds to invest in community development financial institutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Develop5 ment in Opportunity Zones Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7262 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED OPPORTUNITY FUND INVESTMENTS IN 

2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL IN3 STITUTIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1400Z–2(d)(3) of the In5 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR COMMUNITY DE8 VELOPMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.—The 

9 term ‘qualified opportunity zone business’ shall 

10 include any community development financial 

11 institution (as defined in section 103 of the 

12 Community Development Banking and Finan13 cial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4702)) 

14 if, during substantially all the qualified oppor15 tunity fund’s holding period for its investment 

16 in such community development financial insti17 tution, the average of the aggregate amount of 

18 investment, and principal amount of loans, pro19 vided by such community development financial 

20 institution to qualified opportunity zone busi21 nesses (other than community development fi22 nancial institutions) or residents of qualified 

23 opportunity zones is not less than such invest24 ment.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7262 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

3 of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS