alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVE D DECEMBE R22 , 201 0 . --ART[,1E1\1 T

### Ot • !^J3PdRtATtO N ^ • ] OPER/JION S

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F 

### SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10NM000 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-031 2 

### ORDE R O F DISMISSA L Th e Complain t

o f Complainan t

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafte r "Complainant" ) wa s file do n Apri l 2 , 2010 . Responden t SkyWes t Airlines , Inc . (hereinafte r

"Respondent" ) ha dfile daReques t fo r Hearin g o n Marc h29 , 2010 . O n Decembe r

20 , 2010 , Responden t

withdre w it s Reques t

for Hearin g an daske d tha t th e matte r

b e terminated , citin g settlement . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , an agenc y attorne y may withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t for ahearin g withou t th e consen t

o f th e administrativ e la w judge . I f an agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t o r apart y withdraw s th e reques t for ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpart withprejudice. " WHEREFORE , th e withi n file dWithdrawa l of Reques t for Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows :1 . Respondent' s Withdrawa l o f Reques t for Hearin g b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d 2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwithprejudice .

Richar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t 

# I I

• -i i

i

i f i -FA A Docke t No . CP10NM000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Michae l L . Dworkin , Respondent' s Counse l Michae l L . Dworki n an dAssociate s La w Office s 46 5 Californi aStreet , Suit e 21 0 Sa n Francisco , C A 9410 4 TEL : 415-421-250 0 FAX : 415-421-256 0 Scot t R . Morris , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai n Region , ANM- 7 .Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W . Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL ; 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-A dviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S . W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: Terry Toland <ttoland@clarkpud.com>

Date: 7/26/2010 6:55 AM

Subject: Re: Questionaire Extension Request for River Road Generating Plant, Clark Public 

Utilities

Attachments: pic31115.jpg

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam

electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension

requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that

submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of

your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and

establishes a new date.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic31115.jpg)

 

 From: Terry Toland <ttoland@clarkpud.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: "'Marjorie.Brice@ge.com'" <Marjorie.Brice@ge.com> 

 Date: 07/23/2010 11:27 AM 

 Subject: Questionaire Extension Request for River Road Generating Plant, Clark Public Utilities 

Good Morning Jezebele,

I have recently begun employment with Clark Public Utilities at the

River Road Generating Plant. My position is Energy Resources Manager.

I am replacing a gentleman that retired. The questionnaire arrived at

our plant prior to my arrival in this position. Since I am new to the

position and it will take me some time to locate the information

required to complete the questions accurately, I respectfully request an

extension to the due date of this form.

We very much appreciate your consideration in this matter. Please call

me if you have any questions.

Regards,

Terry Toland, Energy Resources Manager

Clark Public Utilities

360-992-3060
TToland@Clarkpud.com

Terry Toland, Energy Resources Manager

Clark Public Utilities

360-992-3060

TToland@Clarkpud.com
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20211

Conference Calendar

 

LEONARD THOMAS EVANS, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF BAYTOWN POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.,

 Defendants,

SARGENT BUCKLEY; RON MOSER, Investigator;

R. MERLIN, Investigator; D. LOPEZ, Investigator,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-94-CV-1699

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leonard Thomas Evans, Sr., Texas prisoner No. 683153,

appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor

of the defendants. Evans has abandoned his claims against the

City of Baytown, City of Baytown Police Chief Shaffer, and Harris

County Investigator D. Lopez. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy
No. 97-20211

-2-

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). The

uncontroverted summary judgment evidence shows that there was

probable cause to believe that Evans was the suspect who sold

cocaine to Investigator Lopez; therefore, the remaining

defendants were entitled to summary judgment as to Evans’s claims

of false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. Sanders v.

English, 950 F.2d 1152, 1159-63 (5th Cir. 1992). The court need

not address whether the defendants were entitled to qualified

immunity. See Wallace v. Texas Tech University, 80 F.3d 1042,

1047 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003, hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                            /s/ Terrence S. McGrath
                            -------------------------
                            Terrence S. McGrath
                            Chief Operating Officer
                            November 12, 2003


                                       24
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4,471,835        
<SECURITIES>                                           0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,364,445      
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0      
<INVENTORY>                                    2,485,630      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,199,871      
<PP&E>                                         1,024,112      
<DEPRECIATION>                                   278,571      
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                12,565,673      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,013,166      
<BONDS>                                                0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0      
<PREFERRED>                                            0      
<COMMON>                                         247,768      
<OTHER-SE>                                    19,817,512      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  12,565,673      
<SALES>                                        2,408,204      
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,527,401      
<CGS>                                            997,719      
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    997,719      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,437,996      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   91,686      
<INCOME-TAX>                                       2,000      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               89,686      
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0      
<CHANGES>                                              0      
<NET-INCOME>                                      89,686      
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.00   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.00   
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.02

                  CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER &
                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Pacult, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Ashley Capital Management, Inc. as General Partner of Atlas Futures Fund, LP,
certify that (i) the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Atlas
Futures Fund, LP fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2005 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Atlas Futures Fund, LP.


ATLAS FUTURES FUND, LP
By:  Ashley Capital Management, Inc., General Partner



By:  /s/ Michael Pacult
     Michael Pacult
     Chief Executive Officer &
     Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 30, 2006
ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE 
 LAW JUGES 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) Docket No. 9327 

Respondent. ) 

) 

ORDER REQUIRING EXPEDITED BRIEFING 

On May 6,2009, non-party ENTEK International LLC ("ENTEK") submitted a 

supplemental motion for in camera treatment. The parties' opposition, if any, to ENTEK's 

motion shall be filed by May 8, 2009. 

ORDERED: :oW? (~P1 D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Date: May 6, 2009
#### FRANKLIN PRINTING CO., INC. v. Richard H. COLLIN et al.

No. 62241.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Richard H. Collin, Michael A. Le-det, and 2-Plus Graphic Coordinators, Inc. applying for supervisory or remedial writs. Parish of Orleans. Civil District Court.

Writ denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 00-4080 CLAUDETTE STAPLETON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CR-99-62) Submitted: August 10, 2000 Decided: August 28, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Samuel H. Shamansky, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Ray M. Shepard, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Claudette Stapleton appeals her jury convictions of conspiring todistribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana and conspiring to launder money with intent to promote and carry on a conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute marijuana. Stapleton argues her trial counsel operated under a conflict of interest that adversely affected his performance.Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are generally not cognizable on direct appeal. See United States v. King , 119 F.3d 290, 295 (4th Cir. 1997). Rather, such a claim is more properly addressed in a collateral proceeding in which c ounsel has the opportunity to respond to the allegations against him. See United States v. DeFusco ,949 F.2d 114, 120 (4th Cir. 1991). An ineffective assistance of counsel claim may be brought, however, when the record conclusively establishes counsel's representation was constitutionally ineffective. See King , 119 F.3d at 295. We note the record reveals Stapleton waived her Sixth Amendment right to separate representation after extensive inquiry by the district court and after the court's admonition that she would be wise to retainseparate counsel. Furthermore, on this record, we do not find counsel's initial representation of Timothy Stapleton and continued representation of Greg Borders (both co-defendants of Appellant) created an actual conflict of interest or that any potential conflict adversely affected counsel's representation of Stapleton. Thus, Stapleton should assert her ineffective assistance claim in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We therefore affirm Stapleton's convictions. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENT OF
STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FROM FORM 10Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                             501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,543
<INVENTORY>                                     50,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,736
<PP&E>                                          71,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 298,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          117,549
<BONDS>                                         92,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   298,947
<SALES>                                        779,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               780,874
<CGS>                                          698,043
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  764,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,263)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,875
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,497
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    219
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 10, 2021

NO. 03-21-00277-CV

Eureka Holdings Acquisitions, L.P., Appellant

v.

Rio Grande Street Partners, LP, and Bruning, Ltd., Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 2, 2021. Eureka Holdings 

Acquisitions, L.P. has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, 

the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and 

dismisses the appeal. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court 

and in the court below.
# **Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

** **

** **

**I, R. James Kelly, Vice Chairman and ChiefFinancial Officer of Family Dollar Stores, Inc. (the “Company”), do herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:**

 

**•****                 ****the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for thequarter ended February 28, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and**

 

**•****                 ****the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.**

 

 
| **Date:  April 8, 2004** |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| **/s/**                       | **R. James Kelly** |   |
|                          | **R. James Kelly** |   |
|                          | **Vice Chairman and  Chief Financial Officer** |   |
|                          | **(Principal  Financial Officer)** |   |

** **

** **

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Family Dollar Stores, Inc. and will be retained by Family DollarStores, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.**

** **

----
CONTACT REPORT 

Person Calling: Keith Barnett 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAQPS/ESD/OCG 

919-541-5605 

Person Called: Tuyet-Le Pham - Air Quality Specialist 

South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 

Date of Contact: June 29, 2010. 

Contact Summary: 

Information on the rule for open clinker piles at cement plants is at 

http://www.aqmd.gov/hb/gb_cal95.html. 

The selection of 1000 feet as the point for different requirements was mutually agreed to by the 

stakeholders (industry and environmental groups).
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 D0 08 4 . EMANUEL DAVI E J ONES v . GLORI A LYNN J ONES.

In t h i s pen d i n g d i v o rce act i o n , Em an u el Dav i e Jo n es s eek s d i s cre t i o n a ry

rev i ew o f a tri al co u rt ord er fi n d i n g h i m i n c o n t e m

p t f o r fai l u re to co m

p l y wi t h t h e

co u rt ’ s o rd er o n d i s co v ery an d at t o rn ey

fees . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n.

“ Gen eral l y , an o rd er is fi n al an d ap p eal ab l e wh en i t leav es n o i ss u es rem ai n i n g

t o b e res o l v ed

, co n s t i t u t es t h e co u rt ’ s fi n al ru l in g on t he m er i t s o f t he act i o n , an d

l eav es th e p art i es wi th n o fu rt h er reco urs e i n t h e t ri al co u rt .” Th o ma s v

. D o u g l a s Co u n t y , 2 1 7 Ga. Ap p

. 5 20

, 5 2 2 (1 ) (4 5 7 SE2 d 8 3 5 ) (1 9 9 5 ). T h e t ri al co urt ’ s o rd er h erei n i s an i n t e r l o c u t o ry o rd er b ecau s e t h e d i v o rce act io n rem ai ns p en d i n g b el o w. Al t h o u g h Em an u el J on es fi l ed an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal

, as d es cri b ed

i n OCGA § 5-6 -3 5, co m

p l i an ce wi t h t h at p ro ced ure d o es n o t ex cu s e a p art y s eek i n g

ap p el l at e rev iew o f an i n t erl o cu t o ry o rd e r f r o m co m p ly i ng wi t h t he i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p eal p ro ced u res s et fo rt h i n OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ). See Ba i l ey v. Ba i l ey , 2 66 Ga. 8 3 2,

8 3 2 -8 3 3 (4 7 1 SE2 d 2 1 3 ) (1 9 9 6 ); S cr u g g s v. Ga

. Dep t

. o

f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 2 6 1 Ga.

5 8 7

, 58 8

- 5 8 9 (1 ) (4 0 8 SE2 d 1 0 3 ) (1 9 9 1). W h ere, as h ere, b o t h d i s cret i o n ary an d

i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced u res ap p l y , an ap p l ican t m u s t fo l l o w t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p eal p ro ced u res an d o bt ai n a t i m el y cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed iat e rev i ew fro m t h e t ri al

co u rt b efo re fi l i n g an ap p l i cat i o n . See S cr u g g s , 2 61 Ga. at 5 8 8 -5 8 9 (1 ).

J o n es ’ s fai lu re t o fo l l o w t h e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p r o c e d u r e s d ep ri v es t h i s Co u rt o f ju ri s d i ct i on o f t h i s ap p l i c a t i o n

. Acco rd in g ly

, t h i s ap p l i cat i o n i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 03, 2020

11/03/2020