alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBSIDIARIES OF HECTOR COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
                                   EXHIBIT 21

            Subsidiaries                           Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-----------------------------------------          ----------------------------
Arrowhead Communications Corporation                         Minnesota
Eagle Valley Telephone Company                               Minnesota
Granada Telephone Company                                    Minnesota
Indianhead Telephone Company                                 Wisconsin
North American Communications Corporation                    Minnesota
Pine Island Telephone Company                                Minnesota
Indianhead Communications Corporation                        Wisconsin
Mustang Communications Corporation                           Minnesota
Alliance Telecommunications Corporation                      Minnesota
    Felton Telephone Company                                 Minnesota
    Loretel Systems, Inc.                                    Minnesota
    Sleepy Eye Telephone Company                             Minnesota
    OU Connection, Inc.                                      Minnesota
    Loretel Financial Systems, Inc.                          Minnesota
    Hastad Engineering Co.                                   Minnesota
    Hager TeleCom, Inc.                                      Wisconsin
    Cannon Communications Corp.                              Minnesota

Arrowhead Communications Corporation, Eagle Valley Telephone Company, Granada
Telephone Company, Indianhead Telephone Company, North American Communications
Corporation, Indianhead Communications Corporation, Mustang Communications
Corporation and Alliance Telecommunications Corporation are 100% owned by Hector
Communications Corporation.

Pine Island Telephone Company is 69% owned by Hector Communications Corporation
and 31% owned by Indianhead Telephone Company.

Loretel Systems, Inc., Sleepy Eye Telephone Company, Felton Telephone Company,
Hager TeleCom, Inc., Cannon Communications Corporation and Loretel Financial
Systems, Inc. are 100% owned by Alliance Telecommunications Corporation.

Hastad Engineering Company and OU Connection, Inc. are 100% owned by Sleepy Eye
Telephone Company.

The financial statements of these subsidiaries are included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements of Hector Communications Corporation.
254 La. 850

#### HANCOCK BANK v. W. R. ALEXANDER et ux.

No. 50112.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: W. R. Alexander applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Evangeline. 227 So.2d 183.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3976]



[[Page 7448]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. MG97-11-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing

February 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 3, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas) submitted revised standards of conduct to 
incorporate changes to its list of marketing affiliates. Texas Gas has 
deleted five companies previously listed as marketing affiliates, whose 
operations have either been merged with another marketing affiliate or 
whose business involving the taking of title to gas has been 
transferred to another marketing affiliate.
    Texas Gas states that it has served copies of its revised standards 
of conduct upon each person designated on the official service list 
compiled by the Secretary in this proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 or 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 or 385.214). All such motions to 
intervene or protest should be filed on or before February 27, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3976 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of Restoration Hardware, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endedFebruary 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Chris Newman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes ofTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Date: April 11,2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                     14,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,725
<PP&E>                                          26,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,822
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,832
<SALES>                                         40,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,572
<CGS>                                           29,322
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,322
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    606
<INCOME-TAX>                                       242
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                364
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       364
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
THREE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER 1, 1997


                                                                        Fully
                                                           Primary     Diluted
                                                         ----------  ----------

Net income                                               $1,256,987  $1,256,987
                                                         ==========  ==========


Reconciliation of weighted
average number of shares
outstanding to amount used
in earnings per share computation:



Weighted average number
     of shares outstanding                                7,439,410   7,439,410

Add - shares issuable from assumed
      exercise of options under the
      Treasury Stock method                               1,170,574   1,170,574
                                                         ----------  ----------

Weighted average number of shares
      outstanding as adjusted                             8,609,984   8,609,984
                                                         ==========  ==========


Net income per common share                              $      .15  $      .15
                                                         ==========  ==========

The Company  utilized the Treasury  Stock  method for  computing  net income per
common share.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8075-8076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs; Reestablishment

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, The Office of Veterans 
Affairs, Washington D.C., Central Office, wishes to submit a statement 
in the Federal Register regarding reestablishment of the Advisory 
Committee on Veterans Business Affairs at the Small Business 
Administration, 409 3rd St. SW, Washington, DC 20416.

    For further information, write or call Joan McNair, Office of 
Veterans Affairs, at SBA, 409 3rd St. SW., Washington, DC 20416, 
telephone 205-6775.


[[Page 8076]]


    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Michael P. Novelli,
Director, Office of Advisory Councils.
[FR Doc. 97-4267 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC
FINANCIAL REPORT
OF
SENSYTECH, INC.

We, the undersigned, being the chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, respectively, of Sensytech, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, to the best of our information, knowledge and
belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ S. Kent Rockwell

S. Kent Rockwell
Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Donald F. Fultz

Donald F. Fultz
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 13, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Sensytech, Inc. and will be retained by
Sensytech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

22
#### William Guy HIGH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-249.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 26, 1973.

James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Elliott C. Metcalfe, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William Guy High, was charged with robbery. He was tried and convicted by a jury, adjudged guilty and sentenced to 99 years in the state penitentiary.

On July 26, 1972, Mr. Joseph Carter, the victim, a law abiding and peaceful citizen, 66 years of age, was employed as a barber in Hillsborough County. He had been employed at the same shop for 42 years. While so employed, in the late afternoon on that date, he was held up and shot by appellant. There was sufficient competent evidence, both direct and circumstantial, to sustain the verdict of the jury.

During the allocution proceeding the appellant twice told the trial judge that he did not give a damn what the judge did. Whereupon, the trial judge promptly stated:

> . • . .1 don’t understand the attitude when you say you don’t give a damn what I do to you, son. But that is your business. But I want it to ring loud and clear throughout this community, this Court don’t appreciate people who go into other people’s business and homes and properties, put guns on them and *240take their property and then in the process of that, the man ends up getting shot.

> 

We have reviewed each of the several points raised on this appeal and have carefully examined the entire record on file here on behalf of the appellant, High, and find nothing therein sufficient to justify a reversal of the judgment appealed. The punishment was severe; but, in the discretion of the trial court — it fit the crime and the man.

The judgment comes to this court clothed with the presumption of correctness; the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3491]



[[Page 6556]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[MT-924-1430-01; MTM 83729]


Cancellation of Proposed Withdrawal; Montana

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice terminates the segregative effect of a proposed 
withdrawal of 82.19 acres of public lands requested by the Bureau of 
Land Management for protection of recreational values along the Madison 
River. This action will open the lands to mining. The lands have been 
and will remain open to surface entry and mineral leasing.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 14, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Ward, BLM Montana State Office, 
P.O. Box 36800, Billings, Montana 59107, 406-255-2949.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Notice of Proposed Withdrawal was 
published in the Federal Register (60 FR 21004) April 28, 1995, which 
segregated the lands described therein for up to 2 years from location 
and entry under the mining laws, subject to valid existing rights, but 
not from the general land laws or the mineral leasing laws. The Bureau 
of Land Management has determined that the withdrawal will not be 
needed at this time and has canceled its application. The lands are 
described as follows:

Principal Meridian, Montana

Red Mountain Campground

T. 3 S., R. 1 E.,
    Sec. 2, lot 2.

Warm Springs Creek Boat Access Site

T. 3 S., R. 1 E.,
    Sec. 10, lots 2 and 4, excluding therefrom the area contained 
within the state highway right-of-way lines, more particularly 
described in Bargain and Sale Deed recorded in Book 162, Page 148, 
Records of Madison County, Montana.

    The areas described aggregate 82.19 acres in Madison County.

    At 9 a.m. on March 14, 1997 the lands will be opened to location 
and entry under the United States mining laws, subject to valid 
existing rights, the provision of existing withdrawals, and other 
segregations of record. Appropriation of any of the lands described in 
this order under the general mining laws prior to the date and time of 
restoration is unauthorized. Any such attempted appropriation, 
including attempting adverse possession under 30 U.S.C. 38 (1988) shall 
vest no rights against the United States. Acts required to establish a 
location and to initiate a right of possession are governed by State 
law where not in conflict with Federal law. The Bureau of Land 
Management will not intervene in disputes between rival locators over 
possessory rights, since Congress has provided for such determinations 
in local courts.

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Thomas P. Lonnie,
Deputy State Director, Division of Resources.
[FR Doc. 97-3491 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
(2008) (quoting State v. Gomes, 112 Nev. 1473, 1479, 930 P.2d 701, 705

(1996)). At English common law a plea of nob o contendere was distinguished from a jury verdict of guilty because "in the former the defendant could introduce evidence of innocence in mitigation of punishment, whereas in the latter such evidence was precluded by the finding of actual guilt." Alford, 400 U.S. at 36 n.8. A similar rationale distinguishes Alford pleas and guilty pleas in Nevada. See generally NRS 1.030 ("The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States, or the Constitution and laws of this State, shall be the rule of decision in all the courts of this State."). A defendant is generally precluded from offering evidence of innocence during a sentencing hearing pursuant to a guilty plea because such evidence would directly contradict the basis for his plea: his admission of guilt. See generally Homick v. State, 108 Nev. 127, 133, 825 P.2d 600, 604 (1992). An Alford plea is different. See Alford, 400 U.S. at 37. Lee maintained his innocence but concluded that his interests required the entry of a guilty plea because there was sufficient evidence of his guilt. More specifically, Lee believed a jury would credit his codefendant's testimony against him rather than his own testimony, in part, because of his lengthy criminal history. Evidence of Lee's innocence was not necessarily irrelevant to the mitigation of his punishment. We therefore conclude that the district court abused its discretion and violated NRS 176.015(2) by prohibiting Lee from presenting evidence of his

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A 

### e

### , J.

innocence in mitigation of punishment during his sentencing hearing, and

we ORDER the judgment of conviction REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for a new sentencing hearing consistent with this order.



# / Hardesty

Douglas Cherry

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Julie Raye Law, LLC Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

### 3
(0) 1947A 4482174
#### Juanita Butler McMANN, Appellant, v. Rupert William McMANN, Appellee.

No. 73-1067.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; David U. Strawn, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
No. 10364.

#### Hostetter *v.*Wible.

Decided April 7, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Tuscarawas county.

*Mr. Ed. C. Seikel*and *Mr. J. H.*Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Hostetler &*Hostetler, for defendant in error:

Judgment affirmed.

' Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.1 2013 10-K






EXHIBIT 4.1


PEOPLES BANCORP INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013






PEOPLES BANCORP INC.
138 Putnam Street
Marietta, OH  45750
(740) 373-3155






February 27, 2014 




Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C.  20549




RE:  Peoples Bancorp Inc. - Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 




Ladies and Gentlemen:


Peoples Bancorp Inc., an Ohio corporation, is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-K”), as executed on February 27, 2014.


Pursuant to the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Peoples Bancorp Inc. hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining (i) the rights of holders of Peoples Bancorp Inc.'s long-term debt or (ii) the rights of holders of the long-term debt of one of its consolidated subsidiaries, not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.  Such long-term debt does not exceed 10% of the total assets of Peoples Bancorp Inc. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


Very truly yours,
            
Peoples Bancorp Inc.


/s/ EDWARD G. SLOANE 
Edward G. Sloane
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald F. Adam,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By:
                  /s/ Donald
      F. AdamDonald
      F. AdamChief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      26, 2010
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13713

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00034-RV-7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

SHAWN M. KING, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

 (June 12, 2014)

Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Sharon K. Wilson, appointed counsel for Shawn M. King in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 

Case: 13-13713 Date Filed: 06/12/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals 

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mathenia’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-13713 Date Filed: 06/12/2014 Page: 2 of 2
#### Gehring *v.*The Schuster Co. et al.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18198

Decided December 26, 1923.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Geauga county.

*Messrs. Gentsch, Rawson & Kavanagh,*and *Messrs. Payer, Winch, Minshall & Karch,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. H. Boyd*and *Messrs. Maurer, Bolton & McGiffin,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.