alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9197-9198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
[Docket No. 96E-0080]


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; Olean; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice 
that appeared in the Federal Register of January 6, 1997 (62 FR 763).

[[Page 9198]]

The document announced FDA's determination of the regulatory review 
period for purposes of patent extension for Olean (olestra). The 
document was published with an error. This document corrects that 
error.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian J. Malkin, Office of Health 
Affairs (HFY-20), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, 
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-443-1382.

    In FR Doc. 97-138, appearing on page 763 in the Federal Register of 
Monday, January 6, 1997, the following correction is made: On page 763, 
in the third column, beginning in line 6, ``Olean (U.S. Patent No. 
4,005,196)'' is corrected to read ``Olean (U.S. Patent No. Re. 
34,617)''.

    Dated: February 20, 1997.
Allen B. Duncan,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Health Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-4960 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
Additional SPI-Anderson Final Permit 

Documents 

(Updated November 2013)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,159
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,573
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,005
<INVENTORY>                                      1,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           3,173
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,433
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         57,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,139
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,220
<SALES>                                         80,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,150
<CGS>                                           67,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,109
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,443
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,179)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)
<FN>
<F1>IN ACCORDANCE WITH INDUSTRY PRACTICE, THE COMPANY PREPARES AN UNCLASSIFIED
BALANCE SHEET.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | WA      HOLDINGS, INC. By:                                                                Title:                                                                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1ST SOURCE      CORPORATION INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC. By:                                                                Title:                                                               |

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

----

| Exhibit B | Earn-Out      Fee Calculation Spreadsheet |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------|

|   | and |
|--------|-----|

|   | Aggregate      IE Value Earn-Out Fee CalculationSpreadsheet |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|

----

|   | A-1 |   |
|--------|-----|--------|

----

|   | C-1 |   |
|--------|-----|--------|

----

|   | E-1 |   |
|--------|-----|--------|

----
Exhibit 10(c)(c)(c)

 

EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO THE HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

(Amended and restated effective October 1, 2006)

 

The Hewlett-Packard Company 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective October 1, 2006, is hereby amended, effective as November 1, 2013, to provide as follows:

 

1.                                      Effective for deferrals occurring on or after January 1, 2014, the definition of  “Newly Hired Employee” in Article I shall be amended to read as follows:

 

“ ‘Newly Hired Employee’ means an Employee (i) who would have qualified as an Eligible Employee as of the November 1 preceding his date of hire based on his initial position and Annual Rate of Pay, and (ii) whose base salary payable in the year of hire is projected to exceed the Code section 401(a)(17) limit for such year; provided, however, that an individual who has previously worked for the Company or an Affiliate will only qualify as a “Newly Hired  Employee” if he meets the requirements of Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-2(a)(7) or any successor thereto.  Generally, a re-hired individual will meet these requirements if (1) he has been paid any and all amounts due him under the Plan (and any plans required to be aggregated with the Plan under Code section 409A) prior to re-hire, or (2) he has not been eligible to participate, other than the accrual of earnings, in the Plan (or any other plan required to be aggregated with the Plan under Code section 409A) for at least 24 months.”

 

2.                                      Effective for deferrals occurring on or after January 1, 2014, the definition of “Late Year Newly Hired Employee” shall be amended to read as follows:

 

“ ‘Late Year Newly Hired Employee’ means an Employee (i) who is hired in November or December and (ii) who would have qualified as an Eligible Employee as of the November 1 preceding his date of hire based on his initial position and Annual Rate of Pay.”

 

This Eighth Amendment to the Hewlett-Packard Company 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is hereby adopted this 20th day of November, 2013.

 

	
 
    	
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Tracy S. Keogh
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Tracy   S. Keogh
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Executive   Vice President, Human Resources
#### SANDERSON FARMS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Alton T. POLLOCK, Appellee.

No. 46228.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 17, 1971.

Boyd, Holifield & Harper, Laurel, for appellants.

J. A. Travis, Jr., Jackson, Joe B. Hawkins, Biloxi, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 15INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Cubic Corporation

We
have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of June 30, 2001, and the related consolidated condensed statements of income for the
three-and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 and the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We
conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists
principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based
on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

We
have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2000
and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated November 28, 2000, we expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet at September 30, 2000, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.



San
Diego, California
August 2, 2001

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Source Corporation (1st Source) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry E. Lentych, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 1st Source.














By:








/s/LARRY E. LENTYCH


Larry E. Lentych


Chief Financial Officer


April 21, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7502 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7502

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 101 South 16th Street in Clarinda, Iowa, as the ``Jessie Field 
                   Shambaugh Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JESSIE FIELD SHAMBAUGH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 101 South 16th Street in Clarinda, Iowa, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Jessie Field Shambaugh Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jessie 
Field Shambaugh Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7502

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 101 South 16th Street in Clarinda, Iowa, as the ``Jessie Field 
                   Shambaugh Post Office Building''.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4036]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
[DD 1230R01 (P)]


American Indian Sacred Sites Consultation Meetings

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, Office of 
the Secretary of Interior.

ACTION: Notice of federal-tribal government-to-government consultation 
on Executive Order No. 13007--Indian Sacred Sites.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior hereby gives notice of three, 
two-day federal-tribal consultation sessions on the implementation of 
President Clinton's Executive Order No. 13007--Indian Sacred Sites. The 
Executive Order calls for the development of policies and procedures to 
protect Indian sacred sites on federal lands and to assure American 
Indians and Alaska Natives access to the sites. The Departments of 
Justice, Energy and Agriculture have accepted Interior's invitation to 
participate in the consultation sessions, as well. Tribal leaders or 
representatives are invited to attend one of the three sessions.
    A discussion group format along with opening and closing plenary 
sessions will be used to ensure that each tribal representative has the 
opportunity to speak and engage in open dialogue with federal 
representatives. Discussion topics will include: Protecting the 
Physical Integrity of Indian Sacred Sites; Concerns with regard to 
Confidentiality of Indian Sacred Sites; Effecting Accommodation; 
Dispute Resolution; and Meaningful Government-to-Government 
Coordination, among others.
    Any tribe unable to participate in the sessions is encourage to 
send written comments on the implementation of the Executive Order and 
the topics listed above no later than April 11, 1997. All written 
comments will be given equal consideration in the preparation of 
implementing policies and procedures.

DATES AND LOCATIONS: Portland Consultation Session will be held on 
March 12-13, 1997 at the Red Lion Jentzen Beach Hotel, 909 N. Hayden 
Drive, Portland, Oregon.
    Denver Consultation Session will be held on March 19-20 at the Red 
Lion Hotel-Denver, 3203 Quebec Street, Denver, Colorado.
    Washington, D.C. Consultation Session will be held on April 3-4, 
1997 at the U.S. Geological Survey Headquarter Office, 12201 Sunrise 
Valley Drive, Reston, Virginia.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Homer, Department of the 
Interior, Office of American Indian Trust, 1849 ``C'' Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., 20240 telephone (202) 208-3338.
Ada E. Deer,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-4036 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-02-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LENNARD PATRICK JERVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1333

[February 2, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kirk Volker, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 502014CF009021A.

Gina M. Girardot of Whittel & Melton, LLC, Spring Hill, for appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. SolagesJones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

FORST, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**RESTORATIONHARDWARE, INC.CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe periodic report of Restoration Hardware, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended January 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary G. Friedman, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)         the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.
| Date: April 11, 2006 |     |                      |
|---------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                      | By:      | /s/ GARY G. FRIEDMAN |
|                      |     | Gary G. Friedman          |
| * *                  | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED SEAN BOUVIER FULCE , A ppellant , v. Case No. 5D 21
- 2654 LT Case No. 2014
- CF
- 866
- A STATE O F FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed June 7, 2022 3.850 A ppeal f ro m the Ci rcuit Co urt for Seminole County , Melissa S outo , Judge. Matthew J

. M etz, P ublic D efender, a nd George D .E. B urden, Assistant P ublic Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, A ttorney G eneral, Tallahassee, an d D aniel P

. C aldwell, Assistant A ttorney G eneral, D aytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

COHEN , WALLIS an d NARDELLA , JJ

. , conc ur.
#### Edward C. Kirk SWING, Jr., Appellant, v. Jane L. SWING, Appellee.

No. 72-373.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 28, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Henry Jones CARSWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-656.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 1973.

Charles W. Musgrove, Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William W. Herring, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Reliford v. State, Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 871. See also House v. State, Fla.App. 1967, 199 So.2d 134; Mann v. Wainwright, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 867; Lee v. State, Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 520; Carswell v. State, Fla.1963, 154 So.2d 829; Bowman v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1972, 460 F.2d 1298.

WALDEN, OWEN, and MAGER, JJ., concur.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 CECILE FOY GSANGER

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

July 30, 2015

Hon. Duane G. Crocker

P. O. Box 2661

121 S. Main, Suite 300

Victoria, Tx 77902

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Philip Nathan Smith Jr.

Smith & Smith Law Firm

300 Oak Avenue

Sulphur Springs, TX 75482

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00186-CV

Tr.Ct.No. 13-2-074436-D

Style: Texas Transco v. Thomas Petroleum, LLC

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: 377th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Cathy Stuart, Victoria County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 21, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on November 14, 1996, (61 FR 58424), Nycomed, Inc., 33 
Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of meperidine (9230), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Nycomed, Inc. to 
manufacture meperidine is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Sec. 823 and 28 CFR Secs. 0.100 
and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the above firm 
for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of 
controlled substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-4896 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### Charles Edward JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Earline T. JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 70-746.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 17, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.