alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Department of Environmental Quality

Matthew H. Mead, Governor To protect, conserve, and enhance the Quality of Wyoming's environment for the benefit of current and future generations

To: Nancy Morlock, Program Director Resource Conservation and Recovery Program U

. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street, 8P-R Denver, CO 80202-1129 From: Todd Parfitt, Director, Wyoming Department ofEnvironmental Quality Date: February 4, 2016 RE: Revised State ofWyoming Revision 6 Request forReauthorization Dear Ms. Morlock, Todd Parfitt. Director

I am pleased to submit on behalfofthe State ofWyoming, Department ofEnvironmental Quality (DEQ) our revised Revision 6 Request for Reauthorization for the regulation ofhazardous wastes in Wyoming. This application includes a revision to our Hazardous Waste Rules and Regulations (HWRR/effective date March 18, 2015) which utilizes Incorporation By Reference (IBR) ofthe Title 40 Code ofFederal Regulations. The HWRRwere last revised by the State ofWyoming in 2008, and were last authorized by EPA in 2002. The enclosed documents incorporate revisions to the original Program Description, Attorney General's Statement, Statutory Checklist, and Consolidated Checklists C3 and ClO that were requested by EPA. The original application for reauthorization was dated May 22, 2015

. Enclosed please find a single hard copy and an electronic copy ofthe following: 1. Revised Program Description 2. Revised Attorney General's Statement, including: Attachment A: RCRA Statutory Checklist Attachment B: IBR Consolidated Checklists 3. Wyoming Hazardous Waste Rules and Regulations, Chapter 1, "General Provisions" Ifyou have any questions concerning this package, please contact Alan Thompson (DEQ/SHWD) at 307- 777-8759 or alan.thompson@wyo.gov. Sincerely,

# ~ Todd Parfitt Director, DEQ

Herschler Building · 122 West 25th Street · Cheyenne, WY 82002 · http ://deq.state.wy.us ADMIN/OUTREACH ABANDONED MINES (307) 777-7758 (307) 777-6145 FAX 777-3610 FAX 777-6462 AIR QUALITY (307) 777-7391 FAX 777-5616 INDUSTRIAL SITING (307) 777-7369 FAX 777-6937 LAND QUALITY (307) 777-7756 FAX 777-5864 SOLID & HAZ

. WASTE (307) 777-7752 FAX 777-5973 WATER QUALITY (307) 777-7781 FAX 777-5973
13

 

03 13 2012 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION NOTICE OF APPEARANCE WASHINGTON, DC 20580 

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

McWANE, INC., et.al. D09351 

03 2012 03 13 20 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 


proceeding the appearance of
 

D counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below)
 

D counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)
 

D counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)
 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding, 

Geoffrey Kahn 

Matthew White 

Jason Leckerman 

Ballard Spahr LLP 

1735 Market Street 

51st Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Phone: 215-665-8500 

Fax Number: 215-864-8999 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being filed. 

SIGMA Corporation 

700 Goldman Drive 

Cream Ridge, NJ 08514 

Phone: 609-758-0800 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED 

(Geoffrey A. Kahn) 3/13/2012 

Return this form to: 	 Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11)
#### David WILLINGHAM, a minor, by his father and next friend O. R. Willingham, and O. R. Willingham, Appellants, v. The BABCOCK COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-800.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 4, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the three month period ended August 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000027850
<NAME>                        MARITIME TRANSPORT & TECHNOLOGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        



</TABLE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40001 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. ENRIQUE GOMEZ

- RODRIGUEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 437

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Enrique Gomez

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez

- Rodriguez h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40001 Document: 00514122643 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 17

- 40001

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40001 Document: 00514122643 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3605]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[NAFTA-01228]


Boise Cascade Corporation, Paper Division, Vancouver, WA; Notice 
of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By letter of January 23, 1997, a company official requested 
administrative reconsideration of the Department of Labor's Notice of 
Negative Determination Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance for workers of the subject firm. The denial 
notice was signed on December 6, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on December 24, 1996 (61 FR 67858).
    The petitioner presents evidence that the Department's 
investigation was incomplete.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the Department of 
Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 4th day of February 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-3605 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4533]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL RATE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting; Notice of Commission Visits

February 19, 1997.
    Notice is hereby given that members of the Postal Rate Commission 
and certain advisory staff members will visit the facilities of the 
following businesses to observe their operations:

R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. Levittown Distribution Facility, Levittown, 
Pennsylvania on March 5, 1997.
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. Lancaster East Division (printing plant) and 
R.R. Donnelley & Sons Co. Lancaster Fulfillment Services, Lancaster, 
Pennsylvania on March 6, 1997.

    Reports of these visits will be placed on file in the Commission's 
Docket Room. For further information contact Margaret P. Crenshaw, 
Secretary of the Commission at 202-789-6840.
Margaret P. Crenshaw,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4533 Filed 2-19-97; 3:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
```
Exhibit 32(a)


               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                             (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation, a New Jersey
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
John H. Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



December 14, 2009                      /s/ John H. Freeman
                                   _____________________________________
                                   John H. Freeman
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained by Dataram
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 12


                               Dean Foods Company

                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                -------------------------------------------------
                                 (In thousands)



                                                               26 Weeks Ended
                                                            November 28, 1999
                                                            -----------------

     Income before taxes                                             $ 89,910
                                                            -----------------

     Fixed charges:
          Interest expense                                             23,733
          Portion of rentals (33%)                                      6,958
                                                            -----------------

          Total fixed charges                                          30,691
                                                            -----------------

     Earnings before taxes and  fixed charges                        $120,601
                                                            =================

     Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                   3.9
                                                            =================










                                       14
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David Scott DARBY.

No. 62501.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, J. Carl Parkerson, applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Ouachita.

Writ denied.

SANDERS, C. J., and SUMMERS and DIXON, JJ., would grant the writ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4478]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting:

    Name of SEP: Program Project Review Meeting.
    Date: March 17-19, 1997.
    Time: 7:30 pm--March 17, 5:00 pm--March 18, 8:00 am--March 19.
    Place: Best Western, 4630 Lindell Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 
63108.
    Contact Person: Mary Bell, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza 
North, Room 611A, 6130 Executive Boulevard, MSC 7410, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7405, Telephone: 301/496-7978.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. Applications 
and the discussions could reveal confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications, 
the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted 
invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, 
Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, 
Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-4478 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                              4,331
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     109,500
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                       110,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        0
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    675,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,758,885
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                        50,000
<COMMON>                           50,293
<OTHER-SE>                     (2,183,725)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      675,453
<SALES>                            42,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   42,630
<CGS>                              20,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,093,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 68,891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,119,414)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,119,414)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,119,414)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.25)




</TABLE>
August 31, 2016

	In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 31st day of August, 2016.

10-16-00253-CR	ROY LEE BOYKIN v. THE STATE OF TEXAS - ON APPEAL FROM THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT OF McLENNAN COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO.  2014-572-C2 - DISMISSED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion that this Court lacks jurisdiction and that the appeal should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  It is further ordered that costs of appeal be, and hereby are, adjudged against Appellant and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
# E C 

# /

R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

1 MEMORANDUM

TO: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG

FROM: Bradley Nelson, EC/R, Inc.

DATE: September 17, 2009

SUBJECT: Summary of the September 11, 2009 Teleconference with the Engine

Manufacturers Association and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to

discuss the Final NSPS for Stationary CI Engines

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) re quested this teleconference with EPA to discuss issues with the final new source pe rformance standards (N SPS) for stationary compression ignition (CI) engines. This main t opic of this meeting was to discuss alternative particulate matter (PM) testing methods for diesel engines greater than 30 liters per cylinder (30 l/cyl). This meeting summary will be available in the docket for this rulemaking (Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0295). The final NSPS for stat ionary CI engines was published in the Federal Register on July 11, 2006 (71 FR 39154).

2.0 ATTENDEES

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Melanie King, OAQPS/SPPD/ESG Peter Westlin, OAQPS/SPPD/MPG Gary McAlister, OAQPS/AQAD/MTG

Engine Manufacturers Association

Joe Suchecki

Caterpillar

Gordon Gerber Brady Winkleman2 Euromot

Johan Boij, Wartsila

EC/R Incorporated (EPA Contractor)

Bradley Nelson

3.0 SUMMARY OF MEETING

The industry group started the teleconference by stating that it wanted to discuss the use of EPA Method 5 in the final CI NSPS (40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII) for stationary diesel engines greater than 30 l/cyl. Industry is concer ned that the exhaust gas from these engines is typically 480 to 660°F and would need to be co oled considerably to perform the EPA Method 5 sampling. According to EMA, in order to collect PM data from a stationary diesel engine greater than 30 l/cyl, it would have to cool the exhaus t gas to approximately 250°F to perform the EPA

Method 5 test. EPA further indicat ed that it will review the info rmation used to set the final standards for greater than 30 l/cyl engines to de termine the method that was used to collect the

PM data. EMA indicated it would check with their members to see if any of them have collected PM test data since promulgation of the rule.

EMA asked for an update of the changes th at are planned for the CI NSPS. EPA responded that while internal agency recommenda tions have been made, no decisions have been finalized at this point. EPA indicated that it is planning to prepare a draft version of the rule amendments in October of this year and exp ects to propose the rule amendments for public comment by February 2010.
5B

- i APPENDIX 5B. T5 MINIATURE BIPIN B ASELINE BALLASTS

TABLE OF CO NTENTS

5B.1 INTRODUCTION

......................................................................................................... 5B-1

5B.2 METHODOLOGY AND RESU LTS

............................................................................ 5B-1

LIST OF TABLES

Table 5B.1 Baseline and EL1 Units for 2- Lamp 4

- Foot T5 MiniBP PS Ballasts .....................5B-15B

- 1 APPENDIX 5B. T5 MINIATURE BIPIN BASE LINE BALLASTS

5B.1 INTRODUCTION

Most T5 ballasts are efficient electronic ballasts . However, d uring inte rviews, s everal

manufacturers expressed concern that less efficient T5 ballasts may enter the U.S. market if no

standard is put into place for these products. Because the U.S. Department of Energy ( DOE )

believes that consumers will purchase inefficient 4-foot T5 ballasts if such ballasts are brought to

market, DOE developed models of inefficient 4-foot T5 standard output ( SO ) and high output

( HO ) ballasts as baselines for the SO and HO T5 representative ballast types, respectively . This

appendix details the development of those models.

5B.2 METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS

To determine the ballast luminous efficiency (BLE) of a n inefficient T5 ballast, DOE

analyzed the percentage difference in BLE for 4-foot medium bipin ( MBP ) programmed start

(PS) systems with similar i nput powers to the T5 system under investigation. As described in

chapter 5 of the TSD, DOE believes ballasts that operate similar total lamp powers can achieve

the same efficiency. DOE compared a 2- lamp 4 -foot MBP PS ballast at the baseline level with a

m ore efficient replacement that had the same ballast factor. DOE found that the baseline MBP

PS ballast was 6.5 percent less efficient than the ballast that met the next most efficient

efficiency level ( EL ). To calculate the efficiency of the theoretical in efficient baseline unit, DOE

applied the 6.5 percent reduction to the BLE required by the EL1 efficiency equation for PS

ballasts (this was the efficiency level met by the least efficient T5 ballasts that are currently

commercially available). DOE believed the baseline ballast would operate the same total lamp

arc power (same ballast factor) , and used this assumption to calculate the appropriate input

power for the baseline unit. DOE found the results to be consistent with test ed values for PS

ballasts that operate four 4 -foot MBP lamps. The table below shows the baseline and EL1

characteristics for both T5 representative ballast types.

Table 5B.1 Baseline and EL1 Units for 2- Lamp 4 -Foot T5 MiniBP PS BallastsEfficiencyLevelForOperation OfBallast TypeStartingMethodInput Voltage(V)BallastFactorInput Power(W)BallastEfficiency(%)

Baseline 2 F28T5 Lamps Electronic PS 277 1.01 67.3 82.8

EL1 2 F28T5 Lamps Electronic PS 277 1.01 63.2 88.7

Baseline 2 F 54T5HO Lamps Electronic PS 277 0.95 122.3 84.2

EL1 2 F54T5HO Lamps Electronic PS 277 0.95 113.0 90.6