alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-5-003]


Algonquin Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 18, 1997, Algonquin Gas Transmission 
Company (Algonquin) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet to become 
effective April 1, 1997:

Sub First Revised Sheet No. 714

    Algonquin states that this filing is made in compliance with Order 
No. 587-B, Standards for Business Practices of Interstate Natural Gas 
Pipelines issued on January 30, 1997 in Docket No. RM96-1-003 by 
incorporating by reference into its Tariff the Electronic Delivery 
Mechanism Standards promulgated by the Gas Industry Standards Board and 
adopted by the Commission in Order No. 587-B.
    Algonquin states that copies of this filing were mailed to all 
customers of Algonquin and interested state commissions, and all 
parties on the RP97-5-000 service list.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed on 
or before March 11, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4815 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 95-ANE-37; Amendment 39-9732; AD 96-18-08]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Pratt & Whitney PW2000 Series Turbofan 
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive 
(AD) 96-18-08 applicable to Pratt & Whitney PW2000 series turbofan 
engines that was published in the Federal Register on September 30, 
1996 (61 FR 50984). A superfluous phrase was added to the compliance 
section and is incorrect. This document deletes that phrase. In all 
other respects, the original document remains the same.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fisher, Aerospace Engineer, 
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (617) 
238-7149, fax (617) 238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final rule airworthiness directive 
applicable to Pratt & Whitney PW2000 series turbofan engines, was 
published in the Federal Register on September 30, 1996 (61 FR 50984). 
The following correction is needed:


Sec. 39.13  [Corrected]

    On page 50986, in the third column, in the Compliance Section of AD 
96-18-08, in paragraph (n)(3), beginning in the second line, ``prior to 
exceeding 20,000 TPC, accomplish the following:'' is corrected to read 
``prior to exceeding 20,000 TPC.''.

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on February 5, 1997.
James C. Jones,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 97-4142 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

In
accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Registrant hereby certifies to his knowledge that this amendment to
annual report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this amendment to annual report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.

|Date:
April 30, 2007 | /s/ Daniel
Glassman
      Daniel
Glassman
                                                                               
      Chief
Executive Officer, President
                                                                               and
                                                                               
      Member of
the Board of Directors
                                                                               
      (Principal
Executive Officer)
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Bradley
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a
separate disclosure document.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH WHEATON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

PATRICK GLEBE,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16-35554

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00518-JCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 6, 2017** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Wheaton appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus

petition challenging his conviction for two counts of second-degree rape and one

FILED

DEC 08 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
count of felony harassment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and

2253, and we affirm.

1. It was not objectively unreasonable or contrary to clearly established law

for the state court to conclude that Wheaton’s right to a public trial was not

violated given the absence of any evidence that (1) the trial judge ordered the

courtroom closed or (2) the public was wholly excluded due to space limitations. 

United States v. Withers, 638 F.3d 1055, 1063 (9th Cir. 2011).

2. Wheaton’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is procedurally

defaulted because he did not fairly present it to the Washington Supreme Court. 

Cooper v. Neven, 641 F.3d 322, 326 (9th Cir. 2011). Wheaton also failed to raise

the claim in his federal habeas petition until his reply brief. See Cacoperdo v.

Demosthenes, 37 F.3d 504, 507 (9th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.

2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4191]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Farm Credit Administration Board; Special 
Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming special meeting 
of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The special meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
February 20, 1997, from 10:00 a.m. until such time as the Board 
concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session
    A. Approval of Minutes
    B. New Business Regulation
--General Financing Agreement [12 CFR Parts 614 and 627] (Proposed)

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-4191 Filed 2-14-97; 2:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEV EN T HC IRC U IT JUNE 1, 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 03- 13876 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D. C . Do c k e tNo . 0 2 - 0 0 5 8 8 - C R - J - NE U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s J E R R Y W A Y N E W R E N , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o r th e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( J une 1, 2005) ON RE M AND F ROM T HE SU PR EM E C O U R T O F TH E U N I TED STA TES B efo re A N D E R S O N , H U L L an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

T hi s appe a l of

J e rryW a y ne W r e n r e ga r di ng the pr opr i e ty of hi s c onvi c t i on a n d s e n te n c e f

o ra tte m p te d p o s s e s s io n o f m a r iju a n aw ith th e in te n t to d is tr ib u te is on r e m a nd f

r om the S upr e m e C our tof the U ni t e d S t a t e s f

orf ur the rc ons i de r a t i on i n the l i gh tof U ni t ed S t at es v. B oo ker, 54 3 U . S . — , 12 5 S . C t . 73 8 (20 05 ). S ee W r e n v . U n ite dS ta te s , — U .S . — , 1 2 5 S . C t. 1 8 6 8 ( 2 0 0 5 ) . W e p r e v io u s ly a f f i r m e d W r e n’ s c onvi c t i on. U ni t e d S t a t e s v. W r e n, N o. 03- 13876 ( D e c . 16, 2004) . A f

t e rr e c ons i de r a t i on, w e a f f i r m W r e n’ s s e nt e nc e a nd r e i ns t a t e our pr e vi ous opi ni on. T he de c i s i on of

the S upr e m e C our ti n B ooke rdoe s notc ha nge ourr e s ol ut i on of thi s appe a l . I n W r e n’ s i ni t i a l br i e f t o thi s C our t , W r e n di d notm a ke a ny ar gu m entabou tthe A pp re nd i / B l akel y l i ne of cas es . Inst ea d, W re n fi rs tpres ent ed a n a r gum e ntr e ga r di ng the S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s i n hi s pe t i t i on f orw r i tof ce rt i orar i . N othi ng i n B oo ker or the re m and o rderof the S up re m e C ou rt“ re qu i re s or sugg es t s thatw e a re ob l i gat ed t o con si der a n i ss ue no tra i se d i n any of the bri ef s tha tappe l l a ntha s f

i l e d w i th us . . . [ or ] tr e a tthe c a s e a s though the [ B ooke r ] i s s ue ha d be e n t i m e l y r a i s e d i n thi s C our t . ” U ni t e d S t a t e s v. D oc ke ry , 401 F . 3d 1261, 12 62 (11th C i r. 20 05 ). W e there fore , “ appl y our w el l -e st abl i shed rul e thati ss ues a nd c ont e nt i ons nott i m e l y r a i s e d i n the br i e f s a r e de e m e d aba ndone d, ” i d. a t1262- 63 , and con cl ud e thatW ar e aband on ed any a rgum ent s he m ayhave un der B oo ker.3

A f t e rr e c ons i de r a t i on, w e a ga i n a f f i r m a nd r e i ns t a t e ourpr e vi ous opi ni on. OP I NI ON RE I NS T AT E D; AF F I RME D.
#### Frank NOVELLO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-122.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 3, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Henry G. HOWELL, Appellant, v. James Edward BROWN, Appellee.

No. 71-427.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; George E. Adams, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Environmental Elements
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John L. Sams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


      Date:  June 27, 2003               /s/  John L. Sams


                                         John L. Sams
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40301

JOHNSON J. LEWIS,

Plaintiff-Appellee

VERSUS

WAYNE SCOTT; JAMES SHAW,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(6:94-CV-689)

September 2, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

This case is on appeal from a Declaratory Judgment rendered in

favor of Plaintiff-Appellee by the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Texas. Plaintiff-Appellee, Johnson J.

Lewis, Texas prisoner number 629945, successfully argued before the

district court that his rights under the Religious Free dom

Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1, had been violated bythe Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division’s

facial hair policy, in that he was not allowed to grow a full beard

and clipped moustache in accordance with the tenets of his Islamic

faith. The district court’s judgment and subsequent denial of

Appellants’ Motion for New Trial and the filing of Appellants’

brief on appeal all preceded the Supreme Court’s decision in City

of Boerne v. P.F. Flores, Archbishop of San Antonio

,

___ U.S.

___,

117 S.Ct. 2157, (1997), wherein Justi ce Kennedy, writing for the

Court, explained that the RFRA exceeded the power of Congress under

§ 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Therefore, the statutory basis for Plaintiff-Appellee’s claim

having evaporated, this matter is reversed and remanded to the

district court with instructions to dismiss Plaintiff-Appellee’s

claim based on the RFRA.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U. S. C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Command Security Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Barry I. Regenstein, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge:


(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      June 27, 2007





By: /s/
      Barry I. Regenstein





Barry
      I.
      Regenstein


President
      and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)






30
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          67,179
<SECURITIES>                                   303,860
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,329,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,511,245
<PP&E>                                       1,953,321
<DEPRECIATION>                                  76,525
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,768,426
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,276,655
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,688,605
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,565)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,768,426
<SALES>                                        450,825
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,803
<CGS>                                          341,025
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  409,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,763
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,973
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

FLOYD COLDMAN

VERSUS

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF

PUBLIC SAFETY AND

CORRECTIONS

NO. 2021 CW 1318

FEBRUARY 14, 2022

In Re: Floyd Coldman, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

Nos. 682503, 679474. 

BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. In this application for writ of mandamus, 

relator, Floyd Coldman, contends no action has been taken by the

district court on his petitions for judicial review. The

matters are set for a status conference before Commissioner

Nicole Robinson on February 16, 2022. As the matters are

proceeding in the district court, relator' s writ application is

denied. 

PMC

MRT

Welch, J., dissents and would grant the writ and order the

district court to proceed expeditiously with review of the

matters. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

WIDEPUTY C ERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3936]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant application and/or 
contract proposals.
    Name of Committee: National Center for Human Genome Research 
Initial Review Group, Genome Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: March 6, 1997.
    Time: 8:30 am.
    Place: Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Ave., Chevy 
Chase, MD, Terrace A.
    Contact Person: Kenji Nakamura, Ph.D., Office of Scientific 
Review, National Center for Human Genome Research, National 
Institutes of Health, Building 38A, Room 604, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 402-0838.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. The 
application and/or contract proposals, and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research)

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-3936 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
In the Matter of 

MeWANE, INC., 

a corporation, and 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRA TrvE LAW JUDGES 

DOCKET NO. 9351 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

a limited partnership, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF 

NON-PARTY SIGMA CORPORATON FOR EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO MOVE TO LIMIT OR QUASH SUBPOENAS 

On February 29, 2012, Non-party Sigma Corporation ("Sigma") filed an unopposed 

motion to extend the time for Sigma to move to limit or quash (1) the Subpoena Duces Tecum 

served on it on February 16, 2012 by Respondent MeWane, Inc. ("MeWane'), and (2) the 

Subpoenas Ad Testificandum that McWane served on it on February 17, 2012 (collectively, the 

"Subpoenas"). Sigma states that under the applicable procedures of the Federal Trade 

Commission Rules of Practice, the deadlines to file a Motion to Limit or Quash McWane's 

Subpoenas are February 29, 2012 and March 1, 2012, respectively. Sigma seeks an order 

extending these deadlines to March 30, 2012. 

In support of its motion, Sigma states that it has conferred with McWane regarding the 

scope of the Subpoenas, and that McWane does not oppose the extensions of time for Sigma to 

file a Motion to Limit or Quash the Subpoenas through March 30, 2012, while the parties 

negotiate in good faith the limitations of the Subpoenas. Sigma further states that it expressly 

reserves the right to argue that service of certain of these subpoenas may be defective because 

Sigma does not have control of some of the individuals identified in the Subpoenas. 

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Unopposed Motion is GRANTED, and it 

is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Non~party Sigma Corporation to file any motion to 

limit or quash Subpoenas shall be March 30, 2012. 

ORDERED: 

Date: March I, 2012 

03 01 2012
 03 01 2012