alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,985
<ALLOWANCES>                                       305
<INVENTORY>                                     13,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,799
<PP&E>                                          26,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,779
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,913
<SALES>                                         15,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,289
<CGS>                                           11,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    275
<INCOME-TAX>                                       112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 8679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Part 678

[I.D. 121196A]


Atlantic Shark Fisheries; Limited Access Program; Extension of 
Comment Period

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS extends the comment period for a proposed rule and 
Amendment 1 to the Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Sharks (FMP) to 
implement the limited access system. The proposed rule was published in 
the Federal Register on December 27, 1996. The proposed rule would 
establish a two-tiered permit system for the Atlantic shark commercial 
fishery, set forth eligibility criteria for these permits based on 
historical participation, and limit the transferability of such 
permits.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed rule must be received on or 
before April 28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to William T. Hogarth, 
Chief, Highly Migratory Species Management Division (F/SF1), Office of 
Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-
West Highway, Room 14853, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kelly or Margo Schulze at 301-
713-2347; fax 301-713-1917.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS has received requests from the affected 
public that more time is necessary to submit their comments on the 
Atlantic shark fishery proposed rule and FMP amendment to implement 
limited access (61 FR 68202, December 27, 1996). The extension in 
comment period will ensure that this proposed rule can be examined in 
conjunction with the proposed rule for limited access in the swordfish 
fishery, which is being published on the same date as this notice. The 
public has informed NMFS that it is essential to examine both proposals 
simultaneously in order to determine the net effect of the two proposed 
limited access systems.
    The proposed rule, as published, would establish a two-tiered 
permit system for the Atlantic shark commercial fishery, set forth 
eligibility criteria for these permits based on historical 
participation, and limit the transferability of such permits. NMFS has 
determined that the Atlantic shark fishery is overfished and 
overcapitalized, with an excessive number of permitted vessels relative 
to the harvest level prescribed by the recovery plan.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: February 19, 1997.
Gary Matlock,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-4656 Filed 2-20-97; 5:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 110 (Thursday, June 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 26545]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12203]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line 
Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Line Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel 
is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, July 10, 2018.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4115.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Line Project Committee will be held Tuesday, July 10, 2018, at 3:00 
p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Rosalind Matherne. For more information please contact 
Rosalind Matherne at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4115, or write TAP 
Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include various IRS issues.
    The committee will be discussing Toll-free issues and public input 
is welcomed.

    Dated: June 1, 2018.
Antoinette Ross,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2018-12203 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shaervon Jones, Appellant.

[735 NYS2d 761]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rosalyn Richter, J.), rendered April 13, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5V2 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of identification and credibility, including the officer’s opportunity to observe the sale, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



       In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
       "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
       the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
       I Dan K. Wassong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
       pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
       the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
             and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.









      /S/ DAN K. WASSONG
      ------------------
      Dan K. Wassong
      Chief Executive Officer
      May 12, 2003

<PAGE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7801
CLARENCE JUNIOR JAMES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. M. JABE, Chief Warden (A-Unit); RON ANGELIO, Head Doc; G. L. BASS, Wa rden, Assistant (A-Unit), Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-935-2) Submitted: April 16, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Junior James, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988), without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion for general relief and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Jabe , No. CA-95-935-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2004, hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant.



                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                             /s/ TERRENCE S. MCGRATH
                             -----------------------
                               Terrence S. McGrath
                             Chief Operating Officer
                                  May 13, 2004


                                       22
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 26, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2011 (the "Report"), I, R. Jeffrey Williams, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ R. JEFFREY WILLIAMSR. Jeffrey WilliamsInterim Chief Financial OfficerMarch 10, 2011
#### Joseph MILGRAM and Margaret Milgram, Appellants, v. SHEARSON, HAMMILL & CO., Inc., Appellee.

No. 70-411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 23, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
No. 10537.

#### Zell et al. *v.*Hawke, Guardian.

Decided March 10, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court *396of Warren county.

*Mr. W. C. Thompson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Brown & Shawhan,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### William IVORY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-557.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Michael T. Furry,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of Reinhold
 Industries,  Inc. (the "Company"),  hereby certifies that to the best of
 his knowledge:

1.        The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
          2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated

The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.



/s/ MICHAEL T. FURRY
Michael T. Furry
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2005


A signed copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
In the Matter of 

 

Health Research Laboratories, LLC, 

 a limited liability company, 

 

Whole Body Supplements, LLC, 

 a limited liability company, and 

 

Kramer Duhon, 

 individually and as an officer of 

 Health Research Laboratories, LLC, 

 and Whole Body Supplements, LLC, 

 

Respondents. 

__________________________________________

 Docket No. 9397 

Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.21(b), a prehearing scheduling conference will be held 

on December 14, 2020 at 4:00 p.m., Eastern. Due to ongoing public health concerns related to 

COVID-19, the scheduling conference will be conducted telephonically. The proceedings will 

be stenographically recorded. To the extent practicable, members of the press and public will be 

allowed to access this toll-free telephone line to listen to the live audio-stream of the scheduling 

conference: 844-867-6169, access code 6735584. Call-in information for the parties will be 

provided by email. This is not an evidentiary hearing. 

The parties are directed to confer in advance of the scheduling conference and to comply 

with Commission Rule 3.21(a) and (b). The expected scheduling order will be provided to the 

parties in advance of the scheduling conference. A 

D. Michael Chappell

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

__________________________________________ 

PUBLIC 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER SETTING PREHEARING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

ORDERED: 

Date: December 8, 2020 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION | OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY | FILED 12/8/2020 | OSCAR NO. 600095 | PUBLIC
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael BAZLEY.

No. 62591.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 7, 1978.

In re: Michael Bazley applying for writs of certiorari, review, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. Since it does not appear that an evidentiary hearing has been held on defendant’s motion for reduction of bail, it is ordered that an evidentiary hearing be held.

DENNIS and TATE, JJ.,

concur and are of the opinion that an evidentiary hearing should have been held on the State’s motion to increase bail in order to provide a basis for the finding of “good cause” to increase bail.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00171

- CV

James HERNANDEZ

, Appellant

v.

R. A. OSBORNE ENTERPRISES, LLC

, Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- CI

- 19771

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 21, 2013

DISMISSED

On July 30, 2013, A ppellant filed a letter inf orming the court that the parties had settled

thei r dispute. On August 1, 2013, A ppellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellant’s

motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f) . Costs of the

app eal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. See id. R. 43.4.

PER CURIAM
#### Arthur Coleman SEWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-315.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 17, 1970.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Palm Beach County; Russell H. McIntosh, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
 




 
 COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK

NUMBER S H A R E S 
AT 
Akebia 
THERAPEUTICS 
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. CUSIP 00972D 10 5 
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
SPECIMEN 
Is the record holder of 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $.000010 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF

Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
endorsed. 
This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation
and the facsimile signatures of it’s duly authorized officers. 
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER TRUST & COMPANY, LLC 
(Brooklyn, NY) 
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
BY 
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
Dated: 
PRESIDENT 
SECRETARY 
Akebia Therapeutics, Inc. 
CORPORATE 
SEAL 
2007

DELAWARE 
* 
AMERICAN BANK NOTE COMPANY 







 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
TEN COM - as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian 
TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor) 
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right
under Uniform Gifts to Minors of survivorship and not as Act tenants in common 
(State) 
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
For value received,
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE 
Shares of the
common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably 
constitute and appoint 
Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
Dated, 
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON
THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN 
EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 
SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 
THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR
INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### WACO SCAFFOLD & SHORING CO., a division of Bliss Laughlin Industries, Inc., Appellant, v. Juliana R. MASON, Appellee.

No. 71-325.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 5, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### The Dennison Brick & Tile Co. *v.*Chicago Trust Co. et al.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18212

Decided January 22, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Tuscarawas county.

*Mr. Smith W. Bennett; Mr. Hugh M. Bennett*and *Mr. Lewis Welty,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Brooklyn Bridge; Mr. J. S. Hare; Messrs. Dawson & Dawson*and *Mr. G. I. Reed,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same, hereby is, dismissed for the' reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Jones, Matthias and Allen, JJ., concur.
Sample FTC Screening Affidavit

April J. Tabor

Secretary

Office of the Secretary

Federal Trade Commission

Room H 135

Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Madam Secretary: 

	This affidavit complies with Commission Rule 4.1(b)(8) to screen former Federal Trade Commission employee,______________, from the matter listed below:

**In the matter of___________________________________________:**

	A)	[Former employee] will not participate in the above proceeding or investigation in any way, directly or indirectly [and describe how the former employee will be screened from participating, e.g., screening former employee from communications, alerting all participating personnel that former employee is not participating, etc.].

	B)	[Former employee] will not share in any fees resulting from the participation;

	C)	Everyone who intends to participate is aware of the requirement that the former employee be screened;

	D)	The client(s) have been informed; and

	E)	The matter was not brought to the participant(s) through the active solicitation of the former employee.

								___________________

Sworn to and subscribed before me this

 day of , .					

								_____

Notary Public

								My commission expires: