alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
CERTIFICATION
I, E. Randall Chestnut, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 27, 2004 of Crown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date:  August 11, 2004 /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut   Chairman of the Board, President & Chief
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Sentigen Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (Commission File No.:
333-49072) and Form S-3 (Commission File No.: 333-60858) of our report dated
February 24, 2003 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sentigen Holding
Corp. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
March 28, 2003


                                       43
#### Richard SLOAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-321.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 29, 1970.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Vera Winter Lee, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Átty. Gen., and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence rendered against him based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault with intent to commit murder in the first degree. The sole point on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict.

The evidence, considered in the light most favorable to appellee, establishes that appellant and his partner in crime made extensive plans to rob a convenience food store in Volusia County. Appellant purchased a weapon and, with his partner, concealed himself behind the food store late at night waiting until all customers had left before effectuating the intended crime. Before closing the store its manager walked around to the rear in order to deposit some trash, at which time he observed appellant and his companion behind a parked vehicle. Before the manager could return to a place of safety in the store, appellant opened fire on him discharging two bullets into his body and missing with a third which went astray.

It is appellant’s contention that there is no sufficient proof of an intent on his part to kill the store manager at the time he fired upon him. We are unable to agree with this position. The evidence is susceptible of the reasonable conclusion that appellant intended to kill the manager when he pointed his weapon at him and fired three times toward his body. Furthermore, the shooting took place while appellant was engaged in the act of committing a felony and he is responsible for natural and probable consequences which flowed from the attempted commission of that act. Finding the evidence to be entirely sufficient to sustain the verdict, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON, and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### Freddie Lee WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-442.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 17, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Peter M. de Manió, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
## FILED

Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA **SYNOPSIS OF**

**THE CASE** 1
**2023 MT**  **224 ,**  **DA 2** **2**

**- 0** **0 6** **4 :**  **MONT ANA**  **ENVIRONMENT AL**  **I NFORMA** 

**TION CENTER**  **AND SIERRA**  **C LUB,**  Appellees , **v. WESTMORELAND**  **ROSEBUD MINING,**  **LLC, MONT**  **ANA D** **EP ARTMENT**  **OF ENVIRONMENT**  **AL Q** **UALITY**

**, and MONT** 

**ANA BOARD OF** 

**ENVIRONMENT**

**AL REVIEW** 

**,** Appellants

. In a unanimous Opinion, the Montana Supreme Court has upheld a lower court ruling that vacated the State permit that allowed the expansion of the Rosebud coal mine in Colstrip, Montana. In 2015, the Montana Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) issued a permit for additional mining to We stmoreland Rosebud Mining. S everal conservation groups challenged the permit, arguing it was issued in violation of the legal requirements of the Montana Strip and Underground Mine Reclamation Act. A district court in eastern Montana agreed and vacated the permit, halting mining activities in the expanded area. However, the Montana Supreme Court temporarily reinstated the permit pending resolution of the legal issue. State law is based on federal requirements for regulating strip mines

. The Supreme Court ruled that the Board of Environmental Review (the Board) made several errors when it upheld DEQ’ s finding that We stmoreland had demonstrated that the proposed mining activity is designed to prevent material damage to the hydrological balance in the area. During the permitting process, W estmoreland acknowledged a projected 13% increase in salinity in the alluvium of East Fork Armell ’s Creek from the proposed mining activities. Although the additional salts in the alluvium would not be a statistically significant concentration, they would increase the length of time during which higher pollutant levels would be present. The Court held that the Board did not adequately analyze whether extending the d

uration of an existing water quality violation satisfied the legal requirements. Further, the Court ruled that the B oard failed to properly consider the cumulative impacts of increased mining activity on the area water quality

. The ruling halts mining expansion into Area B of the Rosebud Mine and sends the permitting process back to the Board for additional review

.

1 This synopsis has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It constitutes no part of the Opinion of the Court and may not be cited as precedent. 11/22/2023
#### Victor LETENDRE, Appellant, v. Veronica HAGMANN, as Executrix of the Estate of Frank G. Hagmann, and Frank Mays and Red’s, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 72-387.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose A. Gonzalez, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification of Chief
Executive Officer(1)




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, the following certification is being made to accompany the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 26,
2008:




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 26, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
A. Risher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      James A. RisherName:
      James A. RisherChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      February 28, 2008





(1)
            A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Del Global Technologies Corp and will be retained by Del
      Global Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon
request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### Herman Lee ALLEN v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38323.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4012]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

East West North South Forwarding, Inc., 2315 N.W. 107 Avenue, 1M57, Box 
25, Miami, FL 33172. Officer: Ashok Kitchloo, President
Central Export Services, 1020 15th Street, #24, Modesto, CA 95354, 
Michael W. Birch, Sole Proprietor

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4012 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.3.1

                                LEASE EXTENSION

     Agreement entered into as of the 16th day of March, 1999 by and between 
Gregory P. Shlopak and Paul M. Butman, Jr. as Trustees of PG Realty Trust 
(hereinafter "Landlord") and Cyrk, Inc., a Delaware corporation with its 
principal place of business located at 3 Pond Road, Gloucester, Massachusetts 
(hereinafter "Tenant");

     WHEREAS, by a lease agreement dated April 19, 1989, the Landlord leased 
certain premises at 3 Pond Road, Gloucester to the Tenant for a term of ten 
(10) years (hereinafter the "Term"); and

     WHEREAS, the Term is about to expire and the Tenant wishes to hold over for
a limited term, but not for another ten (10) year term;

     NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that:

1.   The Term of the lease referred to in the April 19, 1989 lease between the 
Landlord and the Tenant is extended by mutual agreement of the parties until 
11:59 P.M. on December 31, 1999.

2.   All current terms of the lease, to include, but in no way be limited to, 
those regarding the amount of rent, insurance, taxes and utilities shall remain 
in effect for the extended term and are ratified and confirmed by the parties.

     Executed this 16th day of March, 1999.

LANDLORD                                CYRK, INC.


By: /s/ Paul M. Butman, Jr.             By: /s/ Dominic F. Mammola
    -----------------------------           --------------------------------
    Paul M. Butman, Jr., Trustee            Dominic F. Mammola
                                            Executive Vice President & CFO


By: /s/ Gregory P. Shlopak
    -----------------------------
    Gregory P. Shlopak, Trustee
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 730 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 730

To amend title 38, United States Code, to include the cost of applying 
 to an institution of higher learning as part of the benefits provided 
          under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2019

   Mr. King of New York (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. 
   Deutch, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. Jones, Mr. Austin Scott of 
Georgia, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mrs. Dingell, Mr. Ryan, 
 Mr. Meadows, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Walker, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. 
Rush, Mr. Connolly, Mrs. Brooks of Indiana, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. McGovern, 
Mr. Raskin, Mr. Himes, Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Matsui, and 
  Mr. Heck) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to include the cost of applying 
 to an institution of higher learning as part of the benefits provided 
          under the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing Barriers for Veterans 
Education Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. COSTS OF APPLYING TO INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 33 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 3315A the following new section:
``Sec. 3315B. Costs of applying to institution of higher learning
    ``(a) In General.--An individual entitled to educational assistance 
under this chapter shall also be entitled to educational assistance for 
the application fee required to apply to an approved program of 
education at an institution of higher learning.
    ``(b) Amount.--The total amount of educational assistance payable 
under this chapter to an individual for applications described in 
subsection (a) is the lesser of--
            ``(1) the total application fees charged to the individual 
        by the institutions of higher learning; or
            ``(2) $750.
    ``(c) Charge Against Entitlement.--The number of months (and any 
fraction thereof) of entitlement charged an individual under this 
chapter for an application described in subsection (a) shall be 
determined at the rate of one month for each amount that equals the 
amount determined under section 3315A(c)(2) of this title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
3315A the following new item:

``3315B. Costs of applying to institution of higher learning.''.
                                 <all>
```
254 La. 843

#### Jules D. BROWN v. Wilson P. ABRAHAM.

No. 50103.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Wilson P. Abraham applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 225 So.2d 20.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee Meeting on Airport 
Certification Issues

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Rulemaking 
Advisory Committee to discuss airport certification issues.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 12, 1997, at 9:00 a.m. Arrange 
for oral presentations by March 3, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Air Transport Association of 
America, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 
20004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
 Ms. Marisa Mullen, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of 
Rulemaking (ARM-205), 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20591, telephone (202) 267-7653; fax (202) 267-5075.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Sec. 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. II), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee 
to be held on March 12, 1997, at the Air Transport Association of 
America, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 
20004. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> Committee administration.
    <bullet> Concept brief from Friction Measurement and Signing 
Working Group.
    <bullet> General discussion of working group brief.
    <bullet> A discussion of future meeting dates, locations, 
activities, and plans.
    Attendance is open to the interested public, but will be limited to 
the space available. The public must make arrangements by March 3, 
1997, to present oral statements at the meeting. The public may present 
written statements to the committee at any time by providing 25 copies 
to the Executive Director, or by bringing the copies to the meeting. In 
addition, sign and oral interpretation can be made available at the 
meeting, as well as an assistive listening device, if requested 10 
calendar days before the meeting. Arrangements may be made by 
contacting the person listed under the heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 10, 1997.
Robert E. David,
Assistant Executive Director for Airport Certification Issues, Aviation 
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-3669 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-3-M
Exhibit 32.1



BJ Services Company

5500 Northwest Central Drive

Houston, Texas 77092



December 17, 2003



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549-0405



|Re: | CEO/CFO Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------

As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of BJ Services Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.W. Stewart, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|BY    /s/    J.W. Stewart                             
|------------------------------------------------------
|J.W. Stewart Chief Executive Officer December 17, 2003
Exhibit 10.20


 


Miller Industries, Inc.


8503 Hilltop Drive


Ooltewah, TN 37363




 


November 27, 2013


 


VIA EMAIL


Mr. J. Vincent Mish


407 Gentlemen’s Ridge


Signal Mountain, TN 37377


 


Re:  Employment and Change in Control Agreements


 


Dear Mr. Mish:


 


At its meeting on November 4, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company made the determination to terminate the automatic renewing feature of your Employment Agreement and the associated change in Control Agreement, as each was amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008.  As such, I have been directed to provide you with Notice of such action.


 


Accordingly, effective December 31, 2013, under paragraph 3 of the Employment Agreement between you and the Company, as amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008 and under Paragraph II of the Change in Control Agreement between you and the Company, as amended and restated, dated December 30, 2008, the Term of the Agreements will not be extended.


 


All other terms of the Agreements shall remain unchanged.


 


Please acknowledge receipt of this letter by signing in the space provided below and return to me by email.




 



	 	 	 
Very truly yours,

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
/s/ Frank Madonia

	 
	 	 	 
Frank Madonia,

	 
	 	 	 
General Counsel

	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
FM/jf

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
Receipt acknowledged

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
 
 
/s/ J. Vincent Mish





	 	 	 
	 
 
 
J. Vincent Mish
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2005, hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant.



                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                /s/: Richard Banakus
                                --------------------
                                 Richard Banakus
                             Chief Executive Officer
                                   May 9, 2005




                                       20