alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                            CYRK, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION      OWNERSHIP
<C>                               <S>                                <S>
Cyrk Europe Limited               United Kingdom                     100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Super Premium Limited             British Virgin Islands             100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Far East, Inc.               British Virgin Islands             100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk (H.K.) Limited               Hong Kong                          100% owned by Cyrk Far East, Inc.
Cyrk Marketing Services, Inc.     Canada                             100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Acquisition Corp.            Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
CXDATA, Inc.                      Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Global Sourcing and Risk
    Group, Inc.                   Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk/Tonkin Europe LTD            United Kingdom                     100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Tonkin, Inc.                      Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk CPG Corp.                    Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Creative Premium
    Manufacturing, Inc.           Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk CPG Corp.
Loyalty Management, Inc.          Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Simon Marketing, Inc.             Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Simon Marketing (Hong Kong) LTD   Hong Kong                          100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Ventures, Inc.              California                         100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Marketing Consulting
    (Canada) Limited              Canada                             100% owned by Simon Ventures, Inc.
Simon Marketing International
    GmbH                          Germany                            100% owned by Simon Ventures, Inc.
Simon Marketing International
    Limited                       United Kingdom                     100% owned by Simon Marketing International GmbH
Simon Marketing International
    Services Limited              United Kingdom                     100% owned by Simon Marketing International GmbH
Simon Marketing-California, Inc.  California                         100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Entertainment, Inc.         California                         100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Incentives, Inc.            California                         100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Marketing East Limited      Hong Kong                          100% owned by Simon Marketing (H.K.) LTD
</TABLE>
#### Charles F. DOCKHORN, d/b/a Dockhorn Plastering Service, Appellant, v. D. Thomas KINCAID, Appellee.

No. 71-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 23, 1971.

Ezra J. Regen, Sarasota, for appellant.

Jim D. Syprett, of Crabtree, Butler, Brush, Syprett & Meshad, Sarasota, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant sued on an oral contract alleging performance on his part and failure of defendant-appellee to pay an un-liquidated amount of damages. Summary judgment was entered by the court below in favor of defendant-appellee which judgment was predicated upon accord and satisfaction.

The undisputed facts herein place this case squarely within the ambit of Miller-Dunn Co., Inc. v. Green,1 and it is con*647trolled thereby. The case is clearly distinguishable from that decided by this court in Best Concrete Corp. v. Oswalt Engineering,2 in which the sums paid were on a disputed claim which constituted no part of the claim sued for in that case.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from should be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON and McNULTY, JJ., concur.

1

. (1944), 154 Fla. 72, 16 So.2d 637. See, also, 1 Fla.Jur., Accord and Satisfaction, Section 6, p. 74.

2

. (Fla.App.1966), 188 So.2d 587.
ex_300498.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


SPINE INJURY SOLUTIONS, INC.


5151 Mitchelldale, Suite A2


Houston, Texas 77092


 


October 28, 2021


 


Peter L. Dalrymple


13451 Belhaven Dr.


Houston, Texas 77069


 


RE: Transfer of certain accounts receivable 


 


Dear Mr. Dalrymple:


 


As you are aware, on August 31, 2020, the Company issued you a $610,000 one-year secured promissory note (the “Note”), bearing interest at 6% per year, which Note is collateralized by all of the Company’s accounts receivable and a pledge of the stock of its wholly owned subsidiary, Quad Video Halo, Inc. The Note had a balance of $430,000 at September 30, 2021, and is currently past due its maturity date.


 


As previously discussed, the Company and you desire that the Company transfer to SPIN Collections LLC (an entity you own and control) certain accounts receivable the Company owns, which accounts receivable are set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Accounts Receivable”), in consideration of you agreeing to reduce the balance of the Note by $33,946.06. Upon your signature of this letter agreement, accepting and agreeing to the terms of the transfer, the Company hereby transfers and assigns to you all of the Company’s rights, title, and interest in, to, and under the Accounts Receivable, in exchange for the above referenced reduction in debt.


 


Very truly yours,


 


SPINE INJURY SOLUTIONS, INC.


 


 


By: /s/ William F. Donovan                                


William F. Donovan, President and CEO


 


Accepted and agreed to as of the date first written above:


 


 


 /s/ Peter L. Dalrymple                                         


PETER L. DALRYMPLE


 


 


SPIN COLLECTIONS LLC


 


 


By:  /s/ Peter L. Dalrymple                                  


Peter L. Dalrymple,                                  


 


 


 





 










 








 


EXHIBIT A
No. 10463.

#### Ford, Receiver, *v.*The Mica Insulator Co.

Decided May 12, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Messrs. Cummings, McBride & Wolfe,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Jesse E. LaDow,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-84393,  333-66993,  333-92525,  333-39065, 333-03656
333-50292 and  333-50296)  pertaining to the  BYE/OASIS  Engineering,  Inc. 1997
Stock Option Plan,  1998 Employee  Stock Purchase  Plan,  1993 Stock Plan,  1995
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1995 Director Option Plan of Adept  Technology,
Inc.  of our  report  dated July 30,  2001,  with  respect  to the  consolidated
financial  statements  and schedule of Adept  Technology,  Inc.  included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2001.



                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Jose, California
September 17, 2001
#### BIGELOW-LIPTAK CORPORATION et al., Appellants, v. DIXIE LIME AND STONE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 73-888.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 10, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
Order entered September 20, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01201-CR

DAVID DEWAYNE OWENS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-51368-H

ORDER

The Court DENIES as moot appellant’s September 19, 2013 motion to extend time to 

file his brief. The brief was ordered filed on September 19, 2013.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
#### Clifton P. STRONG, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi and Daphine Gowan Strong.

No. 46043.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 25, 1971.

James B. Tucker, Jackson, for appellant.

Billy G. Bridges, Jackson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information from the Temtex Industries,
Inc. and Subsidiaries financial statements for the nine months ended May 31,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,268
<ALLOWANCES>                                       278
<INVENTORY>                                      7,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,573
<PP&E>                                          22,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           720
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,419
<SALES>                                         16,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,104
<CGS>                                           14,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (137)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 211
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,278)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,278)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,278)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)



</TABLE>
#### Eugene DOLPHUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-659.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 13, 1971.

Appeal from Criminal Court of Record, Orange County; W. Rogers Turner, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, DC 20580 

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER 

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 

proceeding the appearance of 

□ counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below) 

□ counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal, Inc. D09391

03 13 2020 

597916 

□ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below) 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES) 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

number of each counsel or representative entering an partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

appearance in the above proceeding, this Notice of Appearance is being filed. 

Andrew George (Special Counsel)

 andrew.george@bakerbotts.com

Baker Botts LLP

700 K Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20001

Phone Number: 202-639-7700

Arch Coal, Inc.

One CityPlace Dr., Suite 300

St. Louis, MO 63141

Phone Number: 314-994-2700

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED 

(Stephen Weissman) 3/13/2020

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11) 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

Docket No. In the Matter of 

D09391

Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal,

Inc.

STATEMENT OF GOOD STANDING PURSUANT TO 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 

Andrew George

Baker Botts LLP

700 K Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20001

Telephone: 202-639-7700

Email: andrew.george@bakerbotts.com

 In connection with the Notice of Appearance filed on March 13, 2020, and pursuant to 16 C.F.R. § 4.1

(d), I state that I am eligible to practice before the Commission as a member of the Bar of the District of

Columbia (Bar No. 988552). As requested by 16 C.F.R. § 4.1 (d), I further state that I am a member of

good standing within the legal profession.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FABRI-CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AS OF NOVEMBER 1,
1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THIRTY-NINE WEEKS THEN
ENDED.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                          19,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    327,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               359,023
<PP&E>                                         199,925
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,368
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 481,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,538
<BONDS>                                         88,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,040
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   481,003
<SALES>                                        663,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               663,480
<CGS>                                          364,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  641,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,449
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,136)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. M-028]


Application of Foreign Underwriters to Write Marine Hull 
Insurance

    The Maritime Administration (MARAD) has received an application 
under 46 CFR part 249 from HIH Casualty and General Insurance Limited, 
an Australia based underwriter, to write marine hull insurance on 
subsidized and Title XI program vessels.
    In accordance with 46 CFR 249.7(b), interested persons are hereby 
afforded an opportunity to bring to MARAD's attention any 
discriminatory laws or practices relating to the placement of marine 
hull insurance which may exist in the applicant's country of domicile.
    Responses to this notice must be sent to the Secretary, Maritime 
Administration, Room 7300, Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20509, and must be received by close of 
business on Wednesday, March 5, 1997.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Joel C. Richard,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-4062 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00163

- CR

Terrell Ladel Davis

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1308456D)

October 1, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to exclude

$26.80 from the total am ount of $468.80 of court costs, fees, and fines that the

judgment orders Terrell Ladel Davis to pay

. Specifically, we modify the judgment

so that the “Order to Withdraw Funds,” which the judgment expressly

incorporates, requires Terrell Ladel Davis to pay $442. It is ordered that the

judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BILLY JAMES SIMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-95-1067, CA-00-958-19)

Submitted: January 31, 2001 Decided: March 6, 2001

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy James Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Billy James Sims seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. In addition, as to Sims’ claim

under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), assuming without

deciding that it may be raised for the first time on appeal from

the denial of a § 2255 motion, we find that the sentence imposed

does not violate Sims’ substantial rights. See U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 5G1.2(d) (1998). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Sims, Nos. CR-95-1067; CA00-958-19 (D.S.C. Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Richard Russell TODD a/k/a Russell Richard Todd, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 69-208—69-210.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Aug. 5, 1969.

Richard Russell Todd, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### Elery Oliver DAVIDSON, Appellant, v. Edith L. SAGE and Travelers Indemnity Cempany of Hartford, a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Florida, Appellees. Edith L. SAGE, Appellant, v. TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF HARTFORD, a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Florida, and Elery Oliver Davidson, Appellees.

Nos. 71-648, 71-769.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 23, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1973.

*221Gary W. Udouj and Calvin J. Faucett of Law Offices of Russell Troutman, Winter Park, and Billings, Frederick & Wooten, Orlando, for appellants.

John L. Sewell and James R. Hunka-piller of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, record on appeal and oral argument we are of the opinion that there are genuine issues of material fact particularly with respect to the matter of the ownership of the automobile in question so as to preclude a summary disposition. Humphrys v. Jarrell, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 404; Nance v. Ball, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 35. Furthermore, the trial court erred in basing the determination of “ownership” on the definition of such term as it appears in Chapter 320, Florida Statutes, relating to motor vehicle licenses. Cf., F.S. § 627.-732(2), F.S.A. In the absence of a definition in the insurance contract or under the statutory provisions relating to such contracts determination of ownership depends upon an analysis of the particular facts and circumstances and a review of the applicable case law.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Reversed.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.