alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Sunshine Act; Meeting

U.S. Railroad Retirement Board; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on February 19, 1997, 9:00 a.m., at the Board's meeting room 
on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

Portion Open to the Public

(1) Impact of P.L. 104-193 on Benefits under Railroad Retirement and 
Railroad Unemployment Insurance acts
(2) Letter to Ken Apfel, Office of Management and Budget, re Bulletin 
No. 96-02, Consolidation of Agency Data Centers
(3) Supplemental Annuity Tax
(4) Streamlining the Approval Process for Change-of-Station
(5) Fiscal Year 1997 Medicare Carrier Budget
(6) Coverage Determinations:
    A. CSX Professional Services Group, Inc.
    B. Paladin Strategies, Ltd.
(7) Regulations:
    A. Part 216, Eligibility for an Annuity (Final Rule)
    B. Parts 222 and 229, Stepchild
    C. Part 295, Payments Pursuant to Court Decree or Court-Approved 
Property Settlement
    D. Part 335, Sickness Benefits
(8) Administrative Circular REF(RRB)-2, Committees at the Railroad 
Retirement Board
(9) Chief Information Officer Vacancy Announcement
(10) Composition of Performance Review Board
(11) Labor Member Truth in Budgeting Status Report

Portion Closed to the Public

(A) SES Performance Appraisal for FY 1996

    The person to contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, 
Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-3579 Filed 2-10-97; 9:38 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA· ORI-GfNAl

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIO~ ;-; 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

.., .. ' .... J ••• 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

McWANE, INC., ) 

a corporation, and ) DOCKET NO. 9351 

) 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., ) 

a limited partnership, ) 

Respondents. ) 

) 

ORDER DENYING COMPLAINT COUNSEL'S 

REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED BRIEFING 

On April 4, 2012, Complaint Counsel filed a Motion to Compel Respondent McWane, 

Inc.'s Answers to Interrogatories Numbers 13 through 16 ("Motion"). In that Motion, Complaint 

Counsel requested an expedited briefing schedule and an order requiring Respondent's response 

to the Motion be filed no later than 5:00 pm on April 10, 2012. 

Complaint Counsel filed its Motion pursuant to Commission Rule 3.38. That rule sets 

forth that any opposition to a motion to compel must be filed within 5 days ofreceipt of service 

ofthe motion and that the Administrative Law Judge shall rule on a motion to compel within 3 

business days ofthe date on which the response is due. Pursuant to Commission Rules 3.38 and 

4.3 1

, Respondent's Opposition is due no later than 5:00 pm on April 11, 2012. Therefore, the 

Commission's Rules ofPractice require expedited briefing on motions to compel. Accordingly, 

Complaint Counsel's request to further expedite the briefing schedule is DENIED. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: April 9, 2012 

1 Commission Rule 4.3 sets forth that computation of any period of time prescribed by the rules shall begin with the 

fIrst business day following that on which the act, event, or development initiating such period of time shall have 

occurred and that when such period of time, with the intervening Saturdays, Sundays, and national holidays counted, 

is seven (7) days or less, each of the Saturdays, Sundays, and such holidays shall be excluded from the computation.
ORIGINAL
 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES
 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) Docket No. 9327 

Respondent. ) 

) 

ORDER ON NON-PARTY THE MOORE COMPANY'S MOTION 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SEEK 
 IN CAMERA TREATMENT 

On May 4,2009, non-party The Moore Company submitted a motion seeking an 

extension of 
 time of one day, until May 5,2009, to seek in camera treatment for documents 

designated by Complaint Counsel as proposed trial exhibits ("Motion"). The Moore Company 

represents that Complaint Counsel does not object to the requested extension of time. The 

Moore Company states that it encountered unexpected difficulties in communicating with its 

client, who resides overseas, and was unable to finalize the declaration in support of the Motion. 

Upon consideration of 
 the Motion, The Moore Company's motion for an extension of 

time to file its motion for in camera treatment, is GRANTED. The Moore Company shall file its 

motion for in camera treatment by May 5,2009. Any oppositions to The Moore Company's 

motion for in camera treatment shall be filed by May 8,2009. 

ORDERED: ~ M c,~1


. ichael Cha pell
 

Administrative Law Judge 

Date: May 5,2009
No. 10893.

#### Rason *v.*The State of Ohio.

Decided June 23, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Defiance county.

*Mr. Henry B. Harris*and *Messrs. Winn & Hay,*for plaintiff in error,

Mr. *D. F. Openlander,*prosecuting attorney, and *Messrs. Ansberry & Farrell,*for defendant in error.

Judgment reversed.

Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same hereby is, reversed for error in affirming the *450judgment of.the court of common pleas. And this court proceeding to render the judgment which the circuit court should have rendered, reverses the judgment of the court of common pleas for error in admitting evidence of alleged unlawful acts of said David Rasor with the prosecuting witness which were claimed to have been committed after the commission of the offense charged in each count of the indictment; and for the further error committed in refusing to give request five (5) asked by the accused after the general charge.

It is, therefore, considered by this court that the verdict be, and the same is, set aside and a new trial granted at the costs of the defendant in error, and that plaintiff in error recover of defendant in error his costs made in this court and the circuit court, to be taxed..

This cause is remanded to the court of common pleas for further proceedings according to law.

Price, C. J., Siiauck, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., cohcur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7279-7280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3885]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-3453-MLA; ASLBP No. 97-723-02-MLA]


Atlas Corporation; Designation of Presiding Officer

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 F.R. 28710 (1972), and Sections 
2.105, 2.700, 2.702, 2.714, 2.714a, 2.717 and

[[Page 7280]]

2.1207 of the Commission's Regulations, a single member of the Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board Panel is hereby designated to rule on 
petitions for leave to intervene and/or requests for hearing and, if 
necessary, to serve as the Presiding Officer to conduct an informal 
adjudicatory hearing in the following proceeding.

Atlas Corporation

(Request for License Amendment)

    The hearing, if granted, will be conducted pursuant to 10 C.F.R. 
Subpart L of the Commission's Regulations, ``Informal Hearing 
Procedures for Adjudications in Materials and Operator Licensing 
Proceedings.'' This proceeding concerns a requested license amendment 
by Atlas Corporation to change the completion date for placement of the 
final radon barrier on the pile at its Moab, Utah facility. Pursuant to 
the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.1205(a) and Federal Register Notice, 
62 F.R. 3313 (January 22, 1997), John Francis Darke opposes this 
amendment and requests a hearing. The Presiding Officer in this 
proceeding is Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk, III. Pursuant to 
the provisions of 10 C.F.R. Sec. 2.722, Administrative Judge Charles N. 
Kelber has been appointed to assist the Presiding Officer in taking 
evidence and in preparing a suitable record for review.
    All correspondence, documents and other materials shall be filed 
with Judge Bollwerk and Judge Kelber in accordance with 10 C.F.R. 
Sec. 2.701. Their addresses are:

Administrative Judge G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Presiding Officer, Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, D.C. 20555
Dr. Charles N. Kelber, Special Assistant, Atomic Safety and Licensing 
Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 11th day of February 1997.
B. Paul Cotter, Jr.,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 97-3885 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          47,790
<SECURITIES>                                    32,163
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    264,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               383,712
<PP&E>                                         248,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                 125,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          270,049
<BONDS>                                        259,628
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,475
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,831
<SALES>                                      1,111,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,120,265
<CGS>                                          871,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  871,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               263,903
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,937
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (36,445)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,126)
<CHANGES>                                        1,729
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,013)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (12.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (12.58)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1**Certification**I, Gregg L. Engles, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Dean Holding Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Dean Holding Company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to Dean Holding Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Dean Holding Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in Dean Holding Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Dean Holding Company’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dean HoldingCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.5. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dean Holding Company’sauditors and the audit committee of Dean Holding Company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectDean Holding Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in Dean Holding Company’s internal control over financialreporting.       /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES         Gregg L. Engles
Financial Literacy and Education 

Commission 
Chairs: Jeannie Chaffin, Administration for Children and Families, HHS and Luke 

Reynolds, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation 

Purpose Statement

The FLEC Children and Youth Committee provides leadership to foster collaborations between 

FLEC member agencies for the purpose of enhancing federal efforts that help American 

children and youth build knowledge, skills, and habits to prepare them for a financially 

capable adulthood. 

Outcome Statement

American children and youth have awareness, knowledge and access to appropriate financial 

products and services and are using this knowledge to demonstrate financial health. 

Proposed Activities Summary

 Foster opportunities to promote savings among children and youth.

 Help parents, teachers, other educators and caregivers be better 

prepared to discuss financial concepts with children and youth.
Areas of Focus

 High-quality information for postsecondary planning

• Encourage the availability of high-quality, targeted, non-duplicative information

 Community of practice for practitioners

• Encourage educators to collaborate, identify, and share best practices

• Potential communities:

• Primary and/or high school educators (teachers, guidance counselors, etc.)

• Postsecondary educators 

• Policymakers

• Producers of financial education tools and resources

Principles

• Producing and using research

• Vulnerable students 
 Chairs: Max Schmeiser, Federal Reserve Board 

Susan Shockey, US Department of Agriculture

 Goal: Financial literacy researchers, educators, 

policymakers, funders, and practitioners have empirically 

validated measures of youth financial capability and evidence 

on the most effective strategies for increasing their financial 

knowledge and improving their financial behaviors and 

outcomes. 

 
 Key Activities: 

◦ Identify and promote research on financial literacy (i.e. FLEC Research Clearinghouse).

◦ Organize a FLEC sponsored journal/publication “Starting Early for Financial Success” to 

promote academic research on financial literacy. 

◦ Encourage the integration of data collection, measurement and evaluation into all 

federally funded financial literacy and education programs. 

◦ Coordinate and disseminate financial education research and findings conducted by 

FLEC members.

◦ Work collaboratively with the private sector to promote high quality, needed research, 

evaluation, and disseminate findings. 

◦ Launch, maintain, and support enhancements to the FLEC Research and Data 

Clearinghouse consistent with President’s Advisory Council Financial Capability 

(PACFC) recommendations.

◦ Provide research assistance to FLEC working committees. 

◦ Update 2012 FLEC Research Priorities & Questions to address “Starting Early for 

Financial Success”.
#### Laura PATNAUDE, Appellant, v. Marcus RING, Appellee.

No. 72-155.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 25, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00676

- CV

IN RE ALLSTATE FIRE AND CA SUALTY COMPANY AND L ATINA PRUITT

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion , Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

On September 20, 2018 , Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of

the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The res pondent and the real parties in interest

may file a response to the petition in this court no later t han October 26 , 2018

. Any such

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

It is so ORDERED on October 11, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CV01324 , styled Samuel Bernal v. Allstate Fire and Casualty

Insurance Company and Latina Pruitt, pending in the County Court at Law No. 10

, Bexar County, Texas, the

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, presiding.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     In connection with the Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Gregg L. Engles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.              /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES   Gregg L. Engles   *Chief Executive Officer*   Date:August 14, 2006Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ABOUT THE PROPOSED RULEMAKING

FOR

ELECTRIC MOTOR ENERGY CONSERVATION STA NDARDS

U.S. Department of Energy , Forrestal Building

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

. Washington, DC 20585

Wednesday

, December 11 , 201 3

Room 8E

- 089



### Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss its proposed

energy conservation standards for commercial and industrial electric motors. DOE will

present the data , analyses, and methodologies it is us ing in the ru lemaking process , and

energy efficiency levels proposed . This public meeting will provide opportunities for

questions, comments, and discussion from those present. Throughout the rulemaking

process, DOE invites written comments, information, and data from all interested parties

.



### Agenda

9:00

– 9:05 am Welcome, Introductions, Public Meeting Norms

Doug Brookman

9:05

– 9:15 am Opening Remarks, Background, Regulatory History

Jim Raba

9:15

– 9:45 am Opening Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

9:45

– 10:15 am Market and Technology Assessment

Brian Coffey

10:15

– 10:30 am Break

10:3 0

– 11:30 am Engineering Analysi s

Brian Coffey

11: 30 am

– 12:00 p m Markups and Energy Use Analysi s ; and Life Cycle Cost

Analysis

Sanaee Iyama

12:00

– 1:00 pm Lunch1:00

– 1:30 pm Shipments, National Impact, and Regulatory Impact,

Analysi s

Sanaee Iyama

1:30

– 1: 45pm Manufacturer Impact Analysi s

Hayden Cook

1:45

– 2: 00 pm Environmental Impact, Utility Impact, and

Employment Impact Analysi s

Sanaee Iyama

2:00

– 2:15 pm Summary of Results and Proposed Standards

Sanaee Iyama

2:15

– 2:40 pm Closing Comments from Participants

Doug Brookman

2:40

– 2:45 pm Closing Remarks

Jim Raba

2:45 pm Adjourn
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                               CYRK, INC. SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION             OWNERSHIP
------------------                    -----------------------------             ---------

<S>                                   <C>                              <C>
Cyrk Europe Limited                         United Kingdom               100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Super Premium Limited                        British Virgin Islands      100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Far East, Inc.                          British Virgin Islands      100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk (H.K.) Limited                             Hong Kong              100% owned by Cyrk Far East Inc.
Cyrk Marketing Services, Inc.                      Canada                100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Acquisition Corp.                            Delaware               100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
CXDATA, Inc.                                      Delaware               100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Global Sourcing and Risk Group, Inc.              Delaware               100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
UKNY Limited                                United Kingdom               100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Tonkin Acquisition, Inc.                          Delaware               100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk CPG Corp.                                    Delaware               100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Creative Premium Manufacturing, Inc.              Delaware              100% owned by Cyrk CPG Corp.
</TABLE>