alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,885,433
<SECURITIES>                                       579,431
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,208,150
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,078,733
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,983,303
<PP&E>                                          23,815,192
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,543,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,449,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,944,609
<BONDS>                                          1,141,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           468,178
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,627,937
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,449,826
<SALES>                                        107,135,437
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,135,437
<CGS>                                           85,757,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,757,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,090,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   131,967
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,875,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29,086
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,904,378)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.70)





</TABLE>
#### David Lee EPPS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43627.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 31, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 274 So.2d 561.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
1

From: DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts.gov

Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 4:02 PM

To: DCD_ECFNotice@dcd.uscourts.gov

Subject: Activity in Case 1:11-cv-02239-RLW FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. GRACO INC. et al 

Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief

This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to 

this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. 

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits 

attorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of 

all documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees 

apply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first 

viewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not 

apply.

U.S. District Court

District of Columbia

Notice of Electronic Filing 

The following transaction was entered on 1/26/2012 at 4:02 PM EDT and filed on 1/26/2012 

Case Name: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. GRACO INC. et al

Case Number: 1:11-cv-02239-RLW

Filer:

Document Number:No document attached 

Docket Text: 

MINUTE ORDER: There is a "strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial 

proceedings." U.S. v. Hubbard, 650 F.2d 293, 317 (D.C. Cir. 1981); see also EEOC v. Natl 

Childrens Ctr., Inc., 98 F.3d 1406, 1409 (D.C. Cir. 1996) ([T]he starting point in considering a 

motion to seal court records is a strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial 

proceedings. (quoting Johnson v. Greater Se. Comty. Hosp. Corp., 951 F.2d 1268, 1277 (D.C. 

Cir. 1991)). The Court finds that the factors outlined in Hubbard and its progeny require 

granting the Motion to Unseal the Complaint, particularly since Graco has not identified any 

specific material in the Complaint that would cause it significant competitive harm, and the 

Court's review discerned no such potential harm. Therefore, the Motion to Unseal the 

Unredacted Complaint by FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION (Docket No. 40) is hereby 

GRANTED. The Clerk is hereby ORDERED to unseal the Unredacted Complaint (Docket No. 8). 

Signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins on 1/26/2012. (tcb) 

1:11-cv-02239-RLW Notice has been electronically mailed to: 

Richard G. Parker rparker@omm.com
2

Rebecca Powers Dick rdick@ftc.gov

J. Robert Robertson robby.robertson@hoganlovells.com

Logan Michael Breed logan.breed@hoganlovells.com, stephanie.seymour@hoganlovells.com

Amanda Jane Hamilton ahamilton1@ftc.gov

Phillip L Broyles pbroyles@ftc.gov

Peter Richman prichman@ftc.gov

1:11-cv-02239-RLW Notice will be delivered by other means to::
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                             1,384,562
<SECURITIES>                                       1,853,701
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,346,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                         138,033
<INVENTORY>                                        5,378,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  14,186,836
<PP&E>                                             8,394,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2,811,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    23,863,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              6,637,800
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                             881,391
<OTHER-SE>                                        14,185,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      23,863,503
<SALES>                                           27,594,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  27,594,217
<CGS>                                             21,468,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     25,052,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      26,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    28,214
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    2,487,695
<INCOME-TAX>                                         940,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                1,547,695
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       1,547,695
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0.43


</TABLE>
#### Betty WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40354.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 7, 1970.

Certiorari denied. 239 So.2d 650.

DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., dissents.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17

- 0434 Filed January 1 0 , 2018
DAVID McCULLOUGH, Applicant

- Appellant,

vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent

- Appellee.

________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Humboldt County, Kurt J. Stoebe, Judge.

David McCullough appeals the dismissal of his postconviction

- relief application on statute

- of

- limitations g rounds. AFFIRMED.

Charles J. Kenville of Kenville Law Firm, P.C., Fort Dodge, for appellant. Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee State

.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Doyle and Mullins, JJ.2

MULLINS, Judge. David McCullough appeals the dismissal of his postconviction

- relief application on statute

- of

- limitations grounds. He requests that we apply the doctrine of equitable tolling to exempt him from the three

- year statutory time bar contained in Iowa Code section 822.3 (2016). Bypassing the State’s error

preservation concerns, we repeat our position that the doctrine of equitable tolling does not apply to section 822.3. See, e.g. , Long v. State , No. 16

- 1220, 2017 WL 2684345, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. June 21, 2017); Harrington v. State , No. 16

- 0953, 2017 WL 2684340, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. June 21, 2017); James v. State , 858 N.W.2d 32, 33 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014). We affirm the ruling of the district court without further opinion pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(a), (c), and (e). AFFIRMED.
ORiGI~JAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIO 

In the Matter of 

ECM BioFilms, Inc., 

a corporation, also d/b/a 

Enviroplastics International 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 9358 

PUBLIC DOCUMENT 

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN WITNESSES 

Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.33, Complaint Counsel noticed the deposition, upon oral 

examination, of the following witnesses: (1) Kristen A. Marineau; (2) Scott Fletcher; and 

(3) Michelle R. Leicher. Respondent specifically agrees not to call the above witnesses at trial in 

consideration for Complaint Counsel's agreement not to depose them. Complaint Counsel and 

Respondent's counsel further stipulate and agree that the above witnesses will not testify at trial, 

even in rebuttal. 

STlPULATED AND AGREED TO AND SUBMITTED BY: 

COMPLAINT COUNSEL ECM BIOFILMS, INC. 

By:-r---:z:?'-T.----1':-;-:-''--------

D ed~:~~~~~~----~ atlierine Jo nso (kjohnson3@ftc.gov) 

Jonathan Cohen (jcohen2@ftc.gov) 

Elisa Jillson (ejillson@ftc.gov) 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. M-8102B 

Washington, DC 20580 

Phone: 202-326-2185; -2551; -3001 

Fax: 202-326-2551 

Complaint Counsel 

Date By:~~ • · .)./.I&D& 

Jona ~Emord (jemord@emord.com) 

Peter A. Arhangelsky (parhangelsky@emord.com) 

Lou F. Caputo (lcaputo@emord.com) 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

11808 WolfRun Lane 

Clifton, VA 20124 

Phone: (202) 388-8899 

Fax: (202) 466-6938 

Counsel for Respondent 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 24, 2014, I caused a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing to be served as follows: 

One electronic copy to the Office of the Secretary, and one copy through the FTC's e-filing system: 

Donald S. Clark, Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room H-159 

Washington, DC 20580 

Email: secretary@ftc.gov 

One electronic copy and one hard copy to the Office of the Administrative Law Judge: 

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Room H-110 

Washington, DC 20580 

One electronic copy to Counsel for the Respondent: 

Jonathan W. Emord 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

11808 WolfRun Lane 

Clifton, VA 20124 

Email: jemord@emord.com 

Lou Caputo 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

3210 S. Gilbert Road, Suite 4 

Chandler, AZ 85286 

Email: lcaputo@emord.com 

Peter Arhangelsky 

Emord & Associates, P.C. 

3210 S. Gilbert Road, Suite 4 

Chandler, AZ 85286 

Email: parhangelsky@emord.com 

I further certify that I possess a paper copy of the signed original of the foregoing 

document that is available for review by the parties and the adjudicator. 

Date: February 24,2013 Is! Katherine Johnson 

Katherine Johnson (kjohnson3@ftc.gov) 

Jonathan Cuht:n (jc.:uht:n2@flc.:.gov) 

Elisa Jillson (ejillson@ftc.gov) 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. M-8102B 

Washington, DC 20580 

Phone: 202-326-2185; -2551; -3001 

Fax: 202-326-2551
#### Lee F. REDEMER v. Brooks S. HOLLIS and Trailer Equipment Manufacturing Co., Inc.

No. 60340.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 21, 1977.

In re: Lee F. Redemer applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 347 So.2d 48.

Writ denied. The result is correct.
#### Richard HUNTER et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 72-819, 72-458.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Robert COREA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1873.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Margarita Esquiroz and Lonworth Butler, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *In re Beverly,*342 So.2d 481 (Fla.1977); and *In re Alvarez,*342 So.2d 492 (Fla.1977).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of )

)

LIBBEY INC., a corporation, )

 ) Docket No. 9301

and )

)

NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC., a corporation. )

To: The Honorable J. Michael Chappell

Administrative Law Judge

JOINT MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE MATTER FROM ADJUDICATION 

Complaint counsel and respondents, Libbey Inc. (“Libbey”) and Newell Rubbermaid Inc.

(“Newell”) pursuant to Rule 3.25(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice (“Rules”), moves that the

matter be withdrawn from adjudication for the purpose of considering a proposed consent agreement

which accompanies this motion. Complaint counsel represents that, in its view, the agreement is

appropriate to settle the issues in this proceeding as these issues relate to Libbey and Newell, and that

the agreement conforms to the requirements of Rule 2.32. 

Respectfully Submitted,

______________________ _____________________

BRUCE PRAGER RICHARD LIEBESKIND

E. MARCELLUS WILLIAMSON MORRIS BLOOM

Counsel for Respondent Libbey RHETT R. KRULLA

Latham & Watkins CHUL PAK

Washington, D.C. ROBERT TOVSKY

(202) 637-2203 WILLIAM DIAZ

APRIL TABOR

BRIAN BURGESS

______________________ Counsel Supporting the Complaint

WILLIAM S. D’AMICO

Counsel for Respondent Newell Bureau of Competition

Chadbourne & Parke Federal Trade Commission

Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. 20580

(202) 974-5616 (202) 326-2661
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July __, 2002, I caused a copy of the Joint Motion to Withdraw the

Matter from Adjudication, Order withdrawing the matter from adjudication, Proposed Decision and

Order, and Proposed Agreement Containing Consent Order to be served upon the following persons

by hand delivery:

Bruce J. Prager

E. Marcellus Williamson

Latham & Watkins

555 Eleventh Street N.W.

Suite 1000

Washington, D.C. 20004-1304

William S. D’Amico

Chadbourne & Parke

1200 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036

_________________________

April Tabor
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Timothy Muris, Chairman

Sheila F. Anthony

Mozelle W. Thompson

Orson Swindle

Thomas B. Leary

In the Matter of )

)

LIBBEY INC., a corporation, )

 ) Docket No. 9301

and )

)

NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC., a corporation. )

ORDER WITHDRAWING MATTER FROM ADJUDICATION

This matter is before the Commission upon the parties’ joint motion that all portions of the

matter be withdrawn from adjudication, pursuant to Section 3.25(b) and (c) of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure, 16 C.F.R. § 3.25(b)-(c), for the purpose of considering a proposed

consent agreement. 

IT IS ORDERED that the aforesaid motion to withdraw this matter from adjudication be, and it

hereby is, granted.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

SEAL:

ISSUED:
News Media Contact(s) : (202) 586-4940 For Immediate Release December 7, 2009 

### Department of Energy Issues Final Rule on Loan Guarantees WASHINGTON, DC – Today, Energy Secretary Steven Chu announced the issue of a final rule amending the Department of Energy’s regulations for its Loan Guarantee Program. The revised rule will allow for increased participation in the program by fi nancial institutions and other investors and enable the support of more innovative energy technologies in the United States. “This much needed change will provide greater flexib ility to the Loan Guarantee Program and help us to support more projects at a better value to taxpayers,” said Secretary Chu. “This is part of our commitment to ensuring businesses are able to access the support they need to create jobs and contribute to a clean energy economy.” Under the rule change, the Loan Guarantee Program will be able to consider financing projects together with other lenders and will be able to provide loan guarantees to projects with multiple participants (who may hold undivided interests in a project). As an example, export credit agencies and other financial institutions will now be able to provide financing to complement Title XVII loans and loan guarantees. This approach will result in lowered risk and potential costs to taxpayers. The U.S. Department of Energy's Loan Guarantee Program paves the way for federal support of clean energy projects that use innovative technologies, and is aimed at spurring further investment in these advanced technologies. The Department incorpor ated feedback from industry and other interested parties in order to maximize the reach and success of the program. On August 7, 2009, the Department published a Noti ce of Proposed Rulemaking and Opportunity for Comment announcing the effort to change the regul ations. A 30-day comment period was extended an additional two weeks in response to public requests. DOE carefully reviewed all of the timely comments on the NOPR from over 2,100 interested parties.
Co p ies of the p ro p osed rule will be available from the De p artment’s Loan Guarantee Pro g ra m . U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Public Affairs, Washington, D.C. Page 1 of 1 U.S. Department of Energy

1/21/2010 http://www.energy.gov/news2009/print2009/8369.htm
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99-1

CERTIFICATION OF WILLIAM BELZBERG, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
WESTMINSTER CAPITAL, INC.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of Westminster Capital,
Inc. (the "Issuer"). I, William Belzberg, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer,
certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
          or 78o(d)); and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Dated: August 14, 2002
                                                     By /s/ William Belzberg
                                                        --------------------
                                                        William Belzberg,
                                                        Chairman of the Board of
                                                        Directors and Chief
                                                        Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Adept Technology, Inc. (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:



| |  |  | the annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 27, 2005                                                               
|                                                                                        
|/s/    ROBERT H. BUCHER                                                                 
|Robert H. Bucher                                                                        
|Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Adept Technology, Inc.
|                                                                                        
|/s/    ROBERT R.
STRICKLAND                                                             
|Robert R. Strickland                                                                    
|Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Adept Technology, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7245-7246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group:

    Agenda/Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 7246]]

    Committee Name: Subcommittee A--Cancer Center Subcommittee.
    Date: April 3-4, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 pm, April 3; 7:30 am, April 4.
    Place: The Bethesda Ramada, 8400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: David E. Maslow, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6130 Executive Blvd. 
Room 643A, Bethesda, MD 20892, Telephone: 301-496-2330.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 522b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers: 93.393, 
Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and 
Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396 Cancer 
Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer 
Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control)

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-3941 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M