CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Hector F. Ruiz, Jr. hereby certify that on July 10, 2003:

I caused one original and twelve copies of Complaint Counsel’s Response to
Respondents’ Motion for Extension of Time to be served upon the following person by hand
delivery:

Office of the Secretary

Federal Trade Commission
Room H-159

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580

I caused copies of Complaint Counsel’s Response to Respondents’ Motion for
Extension of Time to be served upon the following person by facsimile and Federal Express:

Jeffrey Leon, Esq.

Winston & Strawn

35 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60601-9703

Fax Number: (312) 558-5700

HR-LLL20

Hector F. Ruiz, Jr.
Attomey

Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission



AE TRADE COM: on
7S Pecenen oocunents OF ©

JUL 18 2003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Timothy J. Muris, Chairman.
Sheila F. Anthony
Mozelle W. Thompson
Orson Swindle
Thomas B. Leary

In the Matter of

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
a foreign corporation,

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY,

a corporation, and Docket No. 9300

PITT-DES MOINES, INC.
a corporation.

mre rer SH EH YH WY

COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S RESPONSE
TO RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Complaint Counsel do not object to Appellant-Respondents’ motion for a twenty-one day
extension of time to file appeal briefs in this matter.

Under the current schedule, Appellant-Respondents’ brief is due on July 23, 2003, and
Appellee/Cross Appellant-Complaint Counsel’s brief is due thirty days thereafter, on August 22,
2003. If Appellant-Respondents’ motion is granted, Appellant-Respondents’ brief on appeal
would be due on August 13, 2003.

Respondents also propose, in their motion, that Complaint Counsel likewise be granted a
twenty- one day extension for Appellee/Cross Appellant-Complaint Counsel’s brief to the
Commission, which would make Complaint Counsel’s brief due on October 3, 2003. However,

to inhibit any unnecessary delay, Complaint Counsel would prefer to have a shorter extension, of


ten days, for filing of Appellee/Cross Appellant-Complaint Counsel’s brief. Accordingly,
Complaint Counsel ask that September 22, 2003, be set as the date by which Complaint Counsel
shall file its brief on appeal to the Commission.

DATE: July 10, 2003

Respectfully submitted,

c

J. Robert Robertson
Rhett R. Krulla
Steven Wilensky
Hector Ruiz

Counsel Supporting the Complaint
Bureau of Competition

Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Timothy J. Muris, Chairman
Sheila F. Anthony
Mozelle W. Thompson
Orson Swindle
Thomas B. Leary

In the Matter of

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
a foreign corporation,

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY,

a corporation, and. Docket No. 9300

PITT-DES MOINES, INC.
a corporation.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondents’ motion for extension of time to file appeal brief, and
Complaint Counsel’s response thereto,

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant-Respondents’ brief on appeal from the Initial Decision
shall be filed by August 13, 2003.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee/Cross Appellant-Complaint Counsel’s brief
on appeal shall be filed by September 22, 2003.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
ISSUED: