alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
OF ARGON ST, INC. We, the undersigned, being the chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
respectively, of Argon ST, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), do hereby certify, to the
best of our information, knowledge and belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended January 2, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Terry L. CollinsTerry L. Collins
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Donald F. FultzDonald F. Fultz
Chief Financial OfficerDated: February 9, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
has been provided to Argon ST, Inc. and will be retained by Argon ST, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements for the three month period ended August 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
         
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          May-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               Aug-31-1998
<CASH>                                         65,599
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  504,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    183,962      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               770,328
<PP&E>                                         303,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                (259,326)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 876,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          601,664
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       151,308
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   876,569
<SALES>                                        357,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               357,611
<CGS>                                          121,301
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  237,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,514
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,514
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,514
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
 

        

</TABLE>
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Gary Kenneth Kessel 

413 South Main Street #104 

Memphis, TN 38103 

 

Dear Mr. Kessel: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 14, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1652), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 10.24


 


SUMMARY OF


COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS







As of January 1, 2014, non-employee directors are entitled to receive stock-based and cash compensation for their service on the Board of Directors as follows:







Stock-based Compensation:


Each non-employee director receives an annual grant of shares of our common stock with a fair value of $30,000 upon election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.







Cash Compensation:


Each non-employee director is entitled to receive an annual cash retainer of $25,000, paid quarterly.







The Chair of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive an additional cash retainer of $15,000, while each other member of the Audit Committee is entitled to receive $4,000. The Chairs of each of the Nominating and Governance, Compensation, and Strategic Planning Committees are entitled to receive an additional cash retainer of $10,000, while all other committee members are entitled to receive a payment of $2,000 for each committee position. Committee compensation is paid quarterly.
## SERVEi D OCTOBE R13 , IM1 ! •JFPARTMENTO F 

### OFFIC EO FFlE^^MNG S ' ..GCKf. t OPERATION S 

## /0! i o n l U 

### A ^

- 

### u I n th e Matte r

o f . DIAMON D AI RCHARTER , INC . Respondent ) ) Docke t

No . CP10EA000 4 DM S No . FAA-2010-062 0 ORDE R GRANTIN GCONTINUANC EAN D SETTIN GTHIR D LITIGATIO N SCHEDULIN GCONFERENC E On Wednesday , Octobe r

12 , 201 1 th e Complainant , th e FAA , tile daReques t fo r Postponemen t

o f Octobe r 1 8 [sic] , 201 1 Hearin g Conference . I n thi s Reques t

th e FAA note d that th e Responden t

di dno t objec t t o th e Continuance . O n Thursday , Octobe r 13 , 201 1 th e paitie s appeare dby telephon e for th e schedule dSecon dLitigatio n Conference , an ddiscusse dth e statu s o f th e cas e a s wel l a s thei r

calendar availability . . I t I s Hereb y Ordered : : 1 . Th e FAA' s Reques t for Continuanc e o f

th e Litigatio n Schedulin g Conferenc e i s respectfull y granted . 2 . Th e thirdLitigatio n Schedulin g Telephon e Conferenc e i s no w set fo r Thursday , Januar y 12 , 201 2 a t

10:00ai n Easter n time . Th e Offic e o f Hearing s shal l initiate tli c conferenc e call . 3 . Prio r t o January 12,.2012 , if

th e partie s reac hasettlemen t andwisiij. 0 mov e t o cance l th e conference , the y mus t fil e th e necessary settlemen t withdrawal notic e o r

othe r necessary document(s ) wit hth e Offic e o f

Hearings .

J.E . Sullivan U.S . A ativ e Law Judg e Attachment

- Servic e Lis tFD.M S )\io . FAA-20KUt6.2 0 (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) RE\aSE D SERVBC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Adminrstratro n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2 WlOOO '

ON ECOP Y Gregor y S . Winton , Respondent' s Counse l Aviatio n La w Expert s On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 Rockville,M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Zachar y M . Bemian , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n I Aviatio n Plaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e J . E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 -1200-Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigii t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 2059] ; Anention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
Exhibit 10.14








First Amendment to Agreement


 


This First Amendment to the Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of this ___ day of ______________, 2010 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and between NBT Bancorp Inc. (the “Company”) and Martin Dietrich (“Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Agreement dated as of November 5, 2009 (the “Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


 


3.        Term.  Section 3(b)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


As severance pay, an amount equal to the product of 2.99 multiplied by the greater of the sum of your annualized salary for the calendar year in which the change in control of the Company occurs, the maximum bonus that could have been paid to you for such year if all applicable targets and objectives had been achieved, or if no formal bonus program is in effect, the largest bonus amount paid to you during any one of the three preceding calendar years.  No other amounts will be included for purposes of determining the amount of severance pay.







2.            Installment Payout.  Section 3€ of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


The amounts described in this subsection will be paid to you in three equal annual payments with the first payment to be made within 30 days of your termination and the remaining two installments paid on the first business day in January of each of the next two calendar years, provided that under no circumstances will two payments be made during a single tax year of the recipient.







3.            Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and shall continue in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed and delivered this First Amendment to the Agreement, or have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered on their behalf.







	
 

	
 

	
[EXECUTIVE]


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
NBT BANCORP INC.


	
 

	
 

	  
	
 

	
 

	
By:


	
 

	
 

	
Its:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                         ECLIPSE SURGICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
                       (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                    -----------------------
<S>                                                            <C>         <C>         <C>
                                                               1996        1995        1994
                                                               ----        ----        ----
Weighted Average common shares outstanding
   for the period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     14,078      10,470      10,231

Common equivalent shares pursuant to Staff Accounting
 Bulletin No. 83 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .        950       2,295       2,295
                                                              --------    --------    --------

Shares used in per share calculation . . . . . . . . . . .     15,028      12,765      12,526
                                                              --------    --------    --------
                                                              --------    --------    --------


Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $(4,156)    $(2,426)    $(1,982)
                                                              --------    --------    --------
                                                              --------    --------    --------
Net loss per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $ (0.28)    $ (0.19)    $ (0.16)
                                                              --------    --------    --------
                                                              --------    --------    --------
</TABLE>


There is no difference between primary and fully diluted loss per share 
for each period presented.



                                     47
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Request for Additional Information

    Agreement No.: 217-011563.
    Title: NOL/HMM Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd., Neptune Orient Lines, 
Ltd.
    Synopsis: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 6(d) of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. app. 1701-1720) has requested additional information from the 
parties to the Agreement in order to complete the statutory review of 
the Agreement as required by the Act. This action extends the review 
period as provided in section 6(c) the Act.

    Dated: February 19, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4535 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
#### Cullen L. BAREFIELD v. Jeraldine C. BAREFIELD.

Civ. 1353.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 19, 1978.

*1000J. R. Herring, Dothan, for appellant.

James W. Rane, Abbeville, for appellee.

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from the alimony and property division provisions of a divorce decree. The issue is whether the awards of alimony and property are excessive and constitute an abuse of discretion. Our review of the evidence brings us to the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court is supported by legal evidence and is not so unjust as to be an abuse of discretion. Romei v. *Romei,*53 Ala.App. 391, 300 So.2d 834 (1974). We affirm.

In order that our affirmation may be better understood we will give a brief factual background: The marriage of the parties had endured for thirty-one years. There was a son born who is now of age. As is the case in many marriages today, as the “golden” years approached, the relationship that had survived the “struggling” years began to deteriorate and incompatibility set in. The wife charged that neglect and rumors of other women caused her to seek satisfaction through divorce.

Plaintiff was trained as a secretary prior to her marriage and had worked to aid defendant through college. At his insistence she did not work after he became able to support the family except for some part-time work in recent years.

The husband is employed by the Agricultural Extension Service. His present salary is $1,450 gross and $1,040 net per month. There is a home valued at $35,000 with an indebtedness of $3,000. The wife works for a church and nets $58 per week. The husband could retire in February 1978 with retirement pay of ten to fifteen percent less than his present salary. The court ordered the home be given in fee to the wife. She is obligated to pay the remaining indebtedness. The husband was directed to pay her $1,500 lump sum and $375 per month periodic alimony until the mortgage on the home is paid and $275 per month thereafter until the wife dies or remarries. The wife was given a 1970 Volkswagen and the husband a 1975 Pontiac. He. was ordered to pay costs and $675 as attorney fees.

Without calculation of percentage, it may readily be seen that the wife has béen given less than one-third of the income of the husband as alimony. Though she has been given the marriage home in entirety, the evidence disclosed that the husband had inherited real estate of approximately equal value. His retirement income is assured while she has no retirement benefits.

There is little precedential value in repeating at length what has been said in many previous cases concerning the discretionary authority of the trial court in the division of property and award of alimony in divorce cases. *Novak v. Novak,*339 So.2d 77 (Ala.Civ.App.1976). There is nothing in the judgment of the trial court so unreasonable in light of the evidence as to constitute an abuse of discretion. We must therefore affirm.

The wife having requested that we grant her an attorney’s fee on appeal, it is the judgment of the court that she be awarded the sum of $325.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY and HOLMES, JJ., concur.
June 26, 2015 

Ms. Kristen Brumbaugh 

Blackhound Creative Werks 

328 Bluestem Drive 

Elgin, SC 29045 

Dear Ms. Brumbaugh: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

part 21; §§ 45.23, 91.7, 91.9, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.203, subpart E 

91.401−91.417 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we 

cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your April 20, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Blackhound Creative Werks 

into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1352), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### Betty BATTIE, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41094.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 1, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 4, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. See Rule 4.5c (6), Florida Appellate Rules.

CARLTON, Acting C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### Kenneth M. LOWRY, Appellant, v. Bertha Lea LOWRY, Appellee.

No. 71-937.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; L. Clayton Nance, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

______________________ 

IN RE MIKE O’DONNELL and ANDREW CAMERON 

____________________ 

2011-1610 

(Serial No. 09/245,798) 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. 

 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

TIMOTHY E. SIEGEL, Timothy E. Siegel Patent Law, 

PLLC, of Bellevue, Washington, argued for appellants. 

FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, Office of 

the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, 

of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on 

the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and JOSEPH G.

PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 11, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Registrant.



                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                                /s/ David Pollock
                                -----------------
                                  David Pollock
       Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                 August 14, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Lawrence E. Hyatt,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

            1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Lawrence E. Hyatt
--------------------------------
Lawrence E. Hyatt
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2005