alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7124 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7124

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for additional 
 requirements for the use of authority under the Insurrection Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2020

  Mr. Brown of Maryland (for himself, Mr. Khanna, Ms. Norton, Mr. Ted 
  Lieu of California, and Mr. Moulton) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for additional 
 requirements for the use of authority under the Insurrection Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Limitations on the Insurrection act 
including Mechanisms for Invoking its Termination Act'' or the ``LIMIT 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR USE OF AUTHORITY UNDER INSURRECTION 
              ACT.

    (a) Additional Requirements.--
            (1) In general.--Chapter 13 of title 10, United States 
        Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
        section:
``Sec. 256. Requirements for use of authority
    ``The authority under section 251, 252, or 253 of this title--
            ``(1) may only be exercised after the President declares a 
        national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (50 
        U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) applicable to the situation for which the 
        authority is exercised; and
            ``(2) may not be exercised if the national emergency has 
        been terminated.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting after the 
        item relating to section 255 the following new item:

``256. Requirements for use of authority.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Such chapter is further amended--
            (1) in section 251, by striking ``Whenever'' and inserting 
        ``Subject to the requirements under section 256 of this title, 
        whenever'';
            (2) in section 252, by striking ``Whenever'' and inserting 
        ``Subject to the requirements under section 256 of this title, 
        whenever''; and
            (3) in section 253, by striking ``The President'' and 
        inserting ``Subject to the requirements under section 256 of 
        this title, the President''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20-0373

______________________________

PAUL S. PARISER, )

)

Petitioner and Appellee, )

)

and. )

)

JUDITH SHRIAR, )

)

Respondent and Appellant. )

____________________________________) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION

JUDITH SHRIAR, ) OF TIME

)

Counter Plaintiff and Appellant, )

)

v. )

)

PAUL S. PARISER, )

)

Counter Defendant and Appellee. )

 )

UPON motion of Appellee, having no objection from Appellant, and good cause 

appearing therein;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee’s motion for extension of time is granted. 

Appellee shall have up to, and including, December 11, 2020, to prepare and file his response to 

Appellant’s Opening Brief (and Request for Oral Argument) in regard to this appeal pursuant to 

Rule 26(1) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

DATED this _____ day of November, 2020.

______________________________

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 6 2020

11/06/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0373
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2276 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

deduction for mortgage insurance premiums. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2021 

Ms. BROWNLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the deduction for mortgage insurance premiums. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage Insurance 

5 Tax Deduction Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR MORTGAGE INSURANCE PRE7 MIUMS MADE PERMANENT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 163(h)(3)(E) of the Inter9 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking clause 

10 (iv). 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2276 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or accrued after 

3 December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.15


 


IgnitionOne Terms


 


AdJug Publisher Payment Policy


 


Please note the following changes to the AdJug invoicing policies
& procedures:


 


		·	Publisher's payable revenue will be based off AdJugs's monetized impressions which can be found in the reporting area at www.adjug.com
/ www.adjug.de.



		·	Revenue is calculated on a calendar month basis and it’s preferable that invoices are submitted on a monthly basis with
the description clearly stating the payment month.



		·	Payment will only be made to those publishers that have generated over £50 /€50 within one month (exclusive of VAT).
If your revenue is less than this minimum amount, your revenue will be rolled over to the next month until you hit this threshold.



		·	An invoice must be submitted within six (6) months for payment to be made. NB: invoices cannot be backdated. 



		·	Invoices will only be accepted on or after the 6th of each month at which time reconciliations will be finalized



		·	Invoices for revenue earned from UK websites in GBPs will only be accepted in GBPs and :



		o	Emailed to: accounts@adjug.com



		o	Faxed to: +44 (0)207 428 4421



		o	Posted to Accounts Department, AdJug Ltd | Variety Club House | 93 Bayham Street | London | NW1 OAG | United Kingdom.



		·	Invoices for revenue earned from DE websites in Euros will only be accepted in Euros and must be made out to
AdJug GmbH, Bayerstraße 69, 80335 München



		o	Faxed to: +49 (0)89 21 02 998 899 or



		o	Posted to: Tobias Horch, AdJug GmbH, Bayerstraße 69, 80335 München.



		·	Payment will be made by cheque within the 1st week of each month but no earlier than 45 days from date of invoice received.




		·	For further details relating to Fees and Payment, please refer to clause 11 of the AdJug T&C’s



		·	If you have any queries with regard to the AdJug Publisher Payment Policy, please do not hesitate to contact either Joshua
Rohrlach, Publishing Account Manager on +44 (0) 207 4284 436 or joshua.rohrlach@adjug.com or Tobias Horch , Publishing Manager
on +49 89 210 2998 890 or tobias.horch@adjug.de
No. 10347.

#### I. Koblitz & Son *v.*Hamilton et al.

Decided May 5, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Harry Koblitz*and *Messrs. Ford & Snyder,*for plaintiffs iii *419error.

*Messrs. Vessy, Davis & Manak,*for defendants in error.

Judgment afirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Mrs. Gail GAUDET, wife of/and Philip Gaudet v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. and Leopold J. Schouest.

No. 60208.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: Mrs. Gail Gaudet, wife of/and Philip Gaudet applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 346 So.2d 333.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
#### Samuel Louis FULLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-2376.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1977.

Samuel Louis Fuller, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Arthur Joel Berger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and PEARSON and KEHOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, brings this appeal from the denial of a third Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 motion to vacate several judgments. We have completely reviewed the record in this matter and have considered all of the points raised by appellant on appeal. After such review and consideration, we have concluded that all of the points raised are totally devoid of merit; therefore, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      28,695,000              33,091,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,307,000               4,193,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,000                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,409,000               2,389,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,656,000              38,772,000
<PP&E>                                      17,349,000              14,953,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,417,000               4,011,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,839,000              87,601,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,625,000               6,755,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                        200                     100
<COMMON>                                        73,000                  68,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  83,140,800              48,746,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,839,000              87,601,000
<SALES>                                     14,960,000              13,443,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,960,000              13,443,000
<CGS>                                        9,617,000               8,166,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,310,000              41,875,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               502,000               2,625,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,903,000               2,036,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (35,673,000)            (34,963,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (35,673,000)            (34,963,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)                  (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)                  (0.58)


</TABLE>
EX-10.16



 EXHIBIT 10.16 
 HealthStream, Inc. (the “Company”) 
 Summary of Director and
Executive Officer Compensation 
 I. Director Compensation. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional
compensation for serving as directors of the Company. The following table sets forth current rates of cash compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors. 
  

					
	 Retainers and Fees
	  	2014	 
	 Annual Retainer fee
	  	$	4,000	  
	 Board meeting fee
	  	$	1,000	  
	 Committee chair meeting fee
	  	$	1,000	  
	 Committee member meeting fee
	  	$	500	  

 In addition to the cash compensation set forth above, each non-employee director is eligible to receive a
nondiscretionary annual grant of restricted share units for conversion to shares of the Company’s common stock. The restricted share units are granted annually and vest ratably over a three year period. 

II. Executive Officer Compensation. The following table sets forth the current base salaries and fiscal 2013 performance bonuses provided to our
executive officers, including the individuals who the Company expects to be its Named Executive Officers for 2014. 
  

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	Current Base Salary	 	  	Fiscal 2013 Bonus Amount	 
	 Robert A. Frist, Jr.
	  	$	269,850	  	  	$	35,209	  
	 J. Edward Pearson
	  	$	256,200	  	  	$	33,428	  
	 Arthur E. Newman
	  	$	245,700	  	  	$	32,058	  
	 Gerard M. Hayden, Jr.
	  	$	241,500	  	  	$	31,510	  
	 Jeffrey S. Doster
	  	$	241,500	  	  	$	31,510	  
	 Michael Sousa
	  	$	202,125	  	  	$	8,750	  

 III. Additional Information. The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding
Director and Named Executive Officer compensation will be contained in the Company’s 2014 Proxy Statement.
#### Jack R. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. Dick McGINLEY and Mary McGinley, Appellees.

No. EE-163.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 18, 1977.

Hale R. Stancil, Ocala, for appellant.

Willard Ayres of Ayres, Cluster, Curry, Meffert & McCall, Ocala, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing its complaint with prejudice. After appellant was evicted from farm property he had leased from his landlords, appellees, he brought an action seeking to replevin certain crops he had planted during the first year of his tenancy, alleging that at the time of his eviction the crops were either mature and ready for harvest or were approaching maturity. Although growing crops may be treated as personalty for the purpose of sale, they are part of the *1152real estate until severed and follow the real estate unless specifically reserved. *Simmons v. Williford,*60 Fla. 359, 53 So. 452 (1910). We find no error.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

BOYER, Acting C. J., concurring specially-

BOYER, Acting Chief Judge,

concurring specially.

I reluctantly concur in the result reached, but only because of the law that if the estate of a tenant is forfeited or the tenancy terminated by some act of the tenant, (which appears to be the case sub judice) he will not be entitled to recover the crops from the demised premises. 21 Am.Jur.2d “Crops”, § 24 et seq., pp. 609-610
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated January 30, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of K.Swiss Inc.
On Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.  We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
K.Swiss Inc. each on form S-8 (File No. 33-36505, effective August 23, 1990,
File No. 33-77258, effective April 4, 1994 and File No. 33-95650, effective
August 10, 1995).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
JANUARY 30, 1997

                                      62
#### B. E. WELCH v. CROWN ZELLERBACH CORPORATION.

No. 61235.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: B. E. Welch applying for certiora-ri, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Tangipahoa. 351 So.2d 1255.

Granted.

MARCUS and DENNIS, JJ.,

would not grant.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be noti-. fied.
Order entered February 1, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01571-CV

JOANN SEMPLE AND CAROL MATTHEWS, Appellants

V.

FRED VINCENT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-11180

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ January 31, 2017 “motion requesting leave to file 

response to order granting appellee’s motion for judgment nunc pro tunc and order granting 

summary judgment.” Appellants’ motion is GRANTED to the extent we extend the time to file 

appellants’ reply brief to February 21, 2017. All other relief is DENIED. We caution appellants 

that further requests for extension of time will be disfavored. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
No. 10568.

#### The Sutherland Manufacturing Co. v. Donaldson.

Decided March 17, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Kramer & Kramer*and *Mr. Otis H. Fisk,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Alfred B. Benedict*and *Mr. L. J. Crawford,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

                              HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Terrence McGrath, Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ TERRENCE S. MCGRATH
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Terrence S. McGrath
                                       Chief Operating Officer

                                       August 12, 2003

                                       24
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,522                   2,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,585                  44,585
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,300                   1,300
<INVENTORY>                                     58,667                  58,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,379                 109,379
<PP&E>                                          36,809                  36,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,513                  22,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,158                 172,158
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,760                  58,760
<BONDS>                                         43,707                  43,707
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        10,000                  10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,569                  52,569
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,158                 172,158
<SALES>                                         70,663                 210,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,663                 210,050
<CGS>                                           30,527                  85,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,252                 187,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (182)                     118
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,008                   2,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,403                  19,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,619                   7,927
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,784                  11,440
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,784                  11,440
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50                1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47                    1.40
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

In the Matter of 

McWANE, INC., 

a corporation, and 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

a limited partnership, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NO. 9351 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF 

NON-PARTY U.S. PIPE & FOUNDRY COMPANY, INC. 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On March 5, 2012, non-party U.S. Pipe & Foundry Company, Inc. ("U.S. Pipe") filed an 

unopposed motion to extend the time for U.S. Pipe to file a motion to quash or limit a Subpoena 

Duces Tecum (the "Subpoena") served on it on or about February 24,2012 by Respondent McWane, 

Inc. ("McWane"), with a response date of March 21,2012. U.S. Pipe states that pursuant to the 

Federal Trade Commission Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.34(c), the deadline to file a Motion to 

Limit or Quash McWane's Subpoena is March 7,2012. U.S. Pipe seeks an order extend;ng its 

deadline to March 23,2012 and requests its response to the Subpoena be tolled during that period. 

In support of its motion, U.S. Pipe states that the parties are engaged in negotiations regarding 

the scope of the Subpoena, its objections, and the time required for U.S. Pipe to produce its 

documents. U.S. Pipe further states that Respondent McWane does not oppose an extension through 

March 23,2012 in order to afford U.S. Pipe's counsel sufficient time to continue negotiating with 

McWane's counsel on reasonable limitations and modifications of McWane's specifications to 

reduce the burden on U.S. Pipe of responding, thereby potentially avoiding the necessity of filing a 

motion to quash or limit the Subpoena. 

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. It is hereby 

ORDERED that the deadline for non-party U.S. Pipe to file any motion to limit or quash the 

Subpoena shall be March 23, 2012. During that time, U.S. Pipe's obligation to complete its response 

shall be tolled. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chap ell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 6, 2012 

03 06 2012
 03 06 2012
254 La. 859

#### Willis L. GORE et al. v. AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 50138.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: Willis L. Gore et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 225 So.2d 627.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.