8410 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Proposed Rules

accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin

A320–52–1047, dated April 25, 1994.

(1) If all bushings are installed properly,

repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals

not to exceed 900 flight hours until the

modification required by paragraph (c) of this

AD is accomplished.

(2) If any bushing has migrated, prior to

further flight, remove the passenger/crew

door and visually inspect the bushing to

detect damage, in accordance with the

service bulletin.

(i) If the bushing housings are not

damaged, prior to further flight, reinstall the

bushing in accordance with the service

bulletin. Repeat the detailed visual

inspections of the bushings thereafter at

intervals not to exceed 450 flight hours until

the modification required by paragraph (b) of

this AD is accomplished.

(ii) If any bushing housing is damaged,

prior to further flight, ream the door structure

and install an oversize shouldered bushing,

in accordance with the service bulletin. If the

damage is not completely removed after

reaming, prior to further flight, repair the

bushing housing in accordance with a

method approved by the Manager,

Standardization Branch, ANM–113, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate.

(b) For Model A320 and Model A321 series

airplanes; on which Airbus Modification

22422 (reference Airbus Service Bulletin

A320–52–1027) has been installed, and

Airbus Modification 24497 (reference Airbus

Service Bulletin A320–52–1064) has not been

installed: Within 450 flight hours after the

effective date of this AD, perform a detailed

visual inspection to verify proper installation

of the plain bushings of the upper and lower

connection links (2 bushings per door), in

accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex

AOT 52–07, dated July 28, 1994, or Airbus

Service Bulletin A320–52–1066, dated March

6, 1995.

(1) If the bushings are installed properly,

repeat the detailed visual inspection

thereafter at intervals not to exceed 900 flight

hours.

(2) If any bushing is found to be

improperly installed, prior to further flight,

modify the frame segment bushings in

accordance with Airbus Service Bulletin

A320–52–1064, Revision 1, dated September

8, 1995. Accomplishment of the modification

constitutes terminating action for the

requirements of this AD.

(c) For Model A320 series airplanes on

which Airbus Modification 22422 (reference

Airbus Service Bulletin A320–52–1027) has

not been accomplished: Within 3,500 flight

hours after the effective date of this AD,

replace the shouldered bushing on the

locking mechanism with a new oversized

bushing (Kit No. 521027A02), in accordance

with Airbus Service Bulletin A320–52–1027,

Revision 2, dated February 18, 1993, or

Revision 3, dated December 10, 1993.

Accomplishment of this modification

constitutes terminating action for the

repetitive inspection requirements of

paragraph (a) of this AD.

(d) For Model A320 and Model A321 series

airplanes on which Airbus Modification

22422 (reference Airbus Service Bulletin

A320–52–1027) has been installed, and

Airbus Modification 24497 (reference Airbus

Service Bulletin A320–52–1064) has not been

installed: Within 15 months after the

effective date of this AD, modify the frame

segment bushing in accordance with Airbus

Service Bulletin A320–52–1064, Revision 1,

dated September 8, 1995. Accomplishment of

the modification constitutes terminating

action for the repetitive detailed visual

inspection requirements of paragraph (b) of

this AD.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or

adjustment of the compliance time that

provides an acceptable level of safety may be

used if approved by the Manager,

Standardization Branch, ANM–113, FAA,

Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators

shall submit their requests through an

appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance

Inspector, who may add comments and then

send it to the Manager, Standardization

Branch, ANM–113.

Note 2: Information concerning the

existence of approved alternative methods of

compliance with this AD, if any, may be

obtained from the Standardization Branch,

ANM–113.

(f) Special flight permits may be issued in

accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199

of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR

21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to

a location where the requirements of this AD

can be accomplished.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February

19, 1997.

James V. Devany,

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 97–4556 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–U

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96–AWP–34]

Proposed Revision of Class D and

Class E Airspace; Los Angeles, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

to revise the Class D and Class E

airspace areas at Los Angeles

Hawthorne Municipal Airport, CA. The

NPRM is being withdrawn as a result of

the complexity of the air traffic

procedures and operations in this area.

Further analysis is necessary to reduce

the complexity and incorporate

appropriate changes into the airspace

design.

DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn

as of February 25, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William Buck, Airspace Specialist,

Operations Branch, AWP–530, Air

Traffic Division, Western-Pacific

Region, Federal Aviation

Administration, Docket No. 96–AWP–

34, 15000 Aviation Boulevard,

Lawndale, California 90261, telephone

(310) 725–6556.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Proposed Rule

On January 8, 1997, a Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking was published in

the Federal Register to revise the Class

D and Class E airspace areas at Los

Angeles Hawthorne Municipal Airport,

CA (62 FR 1063). During airspace

reclassification, the Hawthorne Airport

Traffic Area (ATA) and the Los Angeles

ATA were combined to form the

Hawthorne Class D airspace. Action was

initiated to redesign the Los Angeles

Hawthorne Municipal Airport surface

areas to reduce the complexity of air

traffic procedures within this area.

Conclusion

The proposed action would have

resulted in a reduction of the surface

areas for the Los Angeles Hawthorne

Municipal Airport, CA. The proposal

would not have reduced the complexity

of the air traffic procedures and

operations in this area. Further analysis

is necessary to incorporate appropriate

changes into the airspace design.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference,

Navigation (air).

Withdrawal of Proposed Rule

Accordingly, pursuant to the

authority delegated to me, Airspace

Docket No. 96–AWP–34, as published in

the Federal Register on January 8, 1997

(62 FR 1063), is hereby withdrawn.

Issued in Los Angeles, California, on

February 5, 1997.

Leonard A. Mobley,

Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division,

Western-Pacific Region.

[FR Doc. 97–4579 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 97–AEA–14]

Proposed Establishment of Class E

Airspace, Kutztown, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

SUMMARY: This proposed rule would

establish Class E Airspace at Kutztown,

PA. The development of a new Standard

Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP)

at Kutztown Airport based on the VHF

Omni-Directional Radio Range (VOR)

and Global Positioning System (GPS)