alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q,
May 2, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-02-1997             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998             AUG-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998             MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                         199,929                 199,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  474,322                 474,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,328,341              11,328,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,425,543              12,425,543
<PP&E>                                      13,528,527              13,528,527
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,117,840               8,117,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,800,161              20,800,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,027,163               6,027,163
<BONDS>                                      6,622,054               6,622,054
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       810,208                 810,208
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,800,161              20,800,161
<SALES>                                      8,657,360              31,182,542
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,657,360              31,182,542
<CGS>                                        5,277,931              18,140,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,621,300              13,946,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             287,082                 921,743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,528,953)             (1,825,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,528,953)             (1,825,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,528,953)             (1,825,986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)                  (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)                  (0.75)
        




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 993]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-406]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the forthcoming regular meeting 
of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
January 9, 1997, from 10:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Floyd Fithian, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4025, TDD (703) 883-4444.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes
B. New Business
    Regulations

    1. Capital Adequacy and Customer Eligibility [12 CFR Parts 613, 
614, 615, 618, 619, and 620] (Final)
    2. General Financing Agreement [12 CFR Part 614] (Proposed)
    3. Loan Underwriting Standards [12 CFR Parts 614 and 619] (Final)

    Dated: January 2, 1997
Floyd Fithian,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 97-406 Filed 1-3-97; 3:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
ex-10_2.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing










AMENDMENT


     Amendment dated as of February 25, 2014 (this “Amendment”) by and between Mineracao Batovi Ltda and Oconn Industries Corp.


W I T N E S S E T H


     WHEREAS, the parties desire to delete a certain provision of the Agreement dated as of February 10, 2014 (the “JV Agreement”; capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to such terms in the JV Agreement) on the terms and provisions contained in this Amendment.


     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


     1. Initial Payment. Mineracao Batovi agrees and acknowledges that Section 5(a)(i) of the JV Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and have no force or effect.


2. Reference. On and after the date hereof, each reference in the JV


Agreement to “this Agreement”, “hereunder”, “hereof”, “herein” or words of like import, and each reference to the JV Agreement in any other agreement, document or other instrument, shall mean, and be a reference to the JV Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.


     3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts and by facsimile or other electronic means and all of said counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument.


     4. Captions. The captions used in this Amendment are intended for convenience of reference only, shall not constitute any part of this Amendment and shall not modify or affect in any manner the meaning or interpretation of any of the provisions of this Amendment.


     5. Binding Effect. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the respective heirs, executors, administrators, representatives and the permitted successors and assigns of the parties hereto.


     6. Governing Law. This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties under this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws set forth in the JV Agreement.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VENTURE HOLDINGS TRUST FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000864167
<NAME> Venture Holdings Trust
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,653
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,518)
<INVENTORY>                                     51,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,274
<PP&E>                                         328,532
<DEPRECIATION>                               (127,988)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 541,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,619
<BONDS>                                        363,374
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   541,315
<SALES>                                        645,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               645,196
<CGS>                                          532,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  592,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,522
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,568
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Albert F. PASSACANTILLI, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. CHRYSLER LEASING CORPORATION, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1205.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 1, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 18, 1971.

*519Fuller, Brumer, Moss & Cohen, Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp & Ware and Robert C. Lane, Jr., Miami, for appellants.

Robert L. Dube and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and SWANN, JJ.

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

This appeal by the plaintiffs is from an order of the trial judge which upon his own motion dismissed the cause for lack of prosecution pursuant to RCP 1.420(e), 30 F.S.A. It appears that the trial judge was mistaken in his finding that, “ * * * it appearing that no action, by any party to the cause, has been taken by the filing of pleadings, Order of Court, or otherwise, in this case for a period of more than one year prior to the date of this order. * * therefore, we reverse.

An examination of the record reveals that in a response to the trial judge’s re-notice of the hearing on the court’s motion for order of dismissal, attorney for the plaintiff-appellant filed an affidavit in which he set forth that one of the plaintiffs had suffered a severe heart attack and stroke but that all of the plaintiffs were now ready to proceed to trial at any time the court would set the trial. Although this tender of trial did not technically comply with the court’s last order continuing trial because of the illness of this same plaintiff, it nevertheless amounted to an offer of immediate trial and as such was a pleading in the cause.

Therefore, it appearing that the trial court based its dismissal upon a mistaken finding as to the posture of the cause before it, the order appealed is reversed and the cause remanded for an order setting the cause for trial as expeditiously as can be done.

Reversed and remanded.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

VJ Technologies, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. SPM4A8-12-C-0023 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 58972, 58973, 59405 

Michael A. Gatje, Esq. 

Steven A. Neeley, Esq. 

Husch Blackwell LLP 

Washington, DC 

Daniel K. Poling, Esq. 

DLA Chief Trial Attorney 

Edward R. Murray, Esq. 

Michael P. Chiffolo, Esq. 

Trial Attorneys 

DLA Aviation 

Richmond, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 9 April 2015 

S, JR. 

Administrati udge 

Armed Servic s Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58972, 58973, 59405, Appeals of 

VJ Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
#### Ossage et al. *v.*Foley. Ossage *v.*Foley et al.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *constitutional question involved.*

(Nos. 18186 and 18187

Decided February 5, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Lewis F. Diemer*and *Mr. T. V. Maxedon,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Creed & Creed*and *Messrs. Dempsey &*Dempsey, for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Janice LIVAS.

No. 62586.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 7, 1978.

In re: Janice Livas, applying for writs of certiorari review, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ granted. Since it does not appear that an evidentiary hearing has been held on defendant’s motion for reduction of bail, it is ordered that such hearing be held.

DENNIS and TATE, JJ.,

concur and are of the opinion that an evidentiary hearing should have been conducted on State’s motion before increase of bail.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
 

)
 

In the Matter of )

)
 

POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) Docket No. 9327 

Respondent. )

)
 

ORDER DESIGNATING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

Pursuant to authority vested in the Federal Trade Commission and delegated to the Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, 

IT IS ORDERED that D. Michael Chappell, Administrative Law Judge of this 

Commission, be, and he hereby is, designated and appointed to take testimony and receive 

evidence in this proceeding and to perform all other duties authorized by law. 

ORDERED: 

OJ) lV\ (1__.A .1 1_

D. Michael Cha~
 Chief Administrative Law Judge (Acting)
 

Date: September II, 2008
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5THCIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40283

Summary Calendar

SANTIAGO ARGUIJO,

Petitioner-Appellant,

VERSUS

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(C-96-CA-190)

January 15, 1998

Before WISDOM, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURAM: *

Santiago Arguijo appeals from the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28

U.S.C. § 2254. A jury convicted Arguijo of delivery of less than 28 grams of cocaine. Arguijo was

sentenced to 55 years of imprisonment. Two months later, Arguijo pleaded guilty to six additional

counts of delivery of less than 28 grams of cocaine and attempted possession of cocaine. His

sentences for these additional counts range between 20 and 80 years, to run concurrent with his

previous sentence. Now, Arguijo complains that his guilty plea was not voluntarily because of his
2

See Grice v. State, 635 S.W.2d 890, 892 (Tex. App. 1982).

3

See LaPorte v. State, 840 S.W.2d 412, 414 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992).

2

counsel’s erroneous advice that the prosecution would seek to “stack” his sentences if he did not

plead guilty.

We have reviewed Arguijo ’s arguments and the record. We find that the district court’s

factual findings are adequately supported by the record. Tex. Penal Code § 3.03 does not give

Arguijo a mandatory right to join or consolidate the charges against him.2 And, Tex. Penal Code §

3.02, which limits the court’s authority to impose consecutive sentences, applies only to offenses

prosecuted in a single criminal action.3 Finally, U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2 has no bearing on this case because

it was a state prosecution. Arguijo’s counsel did not give erroneous advice.

The judgment is AFFIRMED.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7491 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 to 

revive the section 1603 program allowing the Secretary of the Treasury 

to convert certain clean energy tax credits into cash grants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 6, 2020 

Mr. CASTEN of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax 

Act of 2009 to revive the section 1603 program allowing 

the Secretary of the Treasury to convert certain clean 

energy tax credits into cash grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Tax Credit 

5 Direct Payment Act of 2020’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7491 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECTION 1603 PROGRAM REVIVED. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1603 of the American Re3 covery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009 is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)— 

5 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘2009 or 

6 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘2020’’, and 

7 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘after 

8 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘after 2020’’ and by strik9 ing ‘‘during 2009 or 2010’’ and inserting ‘‘dur10 ing 2020 or 2021’’, 

11 (2) in subsection (e)— 

12 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘January 

13 1, 2013’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 2021’’, 

14 (B) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or in 

15 subparagraphs (5)(C) or (5)(E) of section 

16 48(a)’’ after ‘‘section 45(d)’’ and by striking 

17 ‘‘January 1, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 

18 2021’’, 

19 (C) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘except 

20 those described in subparagraphs (5)(C) or 

21 (5)(E) of section 48(a)’’ after ‘‘section 48’’ and 

22 by striking ‘‘January 1, 2017’’ and inserting 

23 ‘‘January 1, 2022’’, and 

24 (3) in subsection (j), by striking ‘‘before Octo25 ber 1, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘before October 1, 

26 2022’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7491 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mitchell S. Steiner, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Veru Inc.;

2. Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

Date: January 5, 2018



/s/ Mitchell S. SteinerMitchell S. SteinerChief Executive Officer
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7324 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow above-the-line deductions for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing deductions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2020 

Mr. WALKER (for himself and Mr. PAPPAS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow abovethe-line deductions for charitable contributions for individuals not itemizing deductions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Universal Giving Pan5 demic Response Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7324 IH

1 SEC. 2. ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR CHARITABLE 

2 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS NOT 

3 ITEMIZING DEDUCTIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (22) of section 62(a) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

6 as follows: 

7 ‘‘(22) CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS FOR INDI8 VIDUALS NOT ITEMIZING DEDUCTIONS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of an indi10 vidual who does not elect to itemize deductions 

11 for the taxable year, the deduction allowed by 

12 section 170 with respect to charitable contribu13 tions (as defined in section 170(c)) made dur14 ing the period beginning on January 1, 2019, 

15 and ending on December 31, 2020. 

16 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN 2020 CONTRIBUTIONS DE17 DUCTIBLE IN 2019.—For purposes of this para18 graph, an individual may elect to treat any 

19 charitable contributions (as so defined) made 

20 after December 31, 2019, and before July 15, 

21 2020, as made in calendar year 2019 (and not 

22 to claim a deduction for such contributions in 

23 2020). 

24 ‘‘(C) AMENDED RETURN PERMITTED.—In 

25 the case of an individual who has filed the re26 turn of tax for 2019 and who did not elect to 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7324 IH

1 itemize deductions on such return, such indi2 vidual may file an amended return for such 

3 year in order to apply subparagraph (A) or to 

4 make the election under clause (i) (or both). 

5 ‘‘(D) LIMITATION.—The deduction to 

6 which subparagraph (A) applies for any taxable 

7 year (after the application of subparagraph 

(B)) shall not exceed an amount equal to 1 8 ⁄3 of 

9 the amount of the standard deduction with re10 spect to such individual for such taxable year.’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 62 of the 

12 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

13 subsection (f). 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to charitable contributions (as de16 fined in section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

17 1986) made after December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Bernard BARKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-837.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.