alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Norman JOSEPH and Saide M. Joseph, his wife, Appellants, v. Robert D. RIEMAN and Helen F. Rieman, his wife, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-616.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 12, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1971.

Lewis Horwitz, of Broad & Cassel, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Walter M. Dingwall, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Rieman.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full considera*369tion, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., MAGER, J., and Mc-LANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Petition of John D. STEELE, Petitioner, Petition for Reinstatement.

No. 43851.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 26, 1973.

*351John D. Steele, in pro. per.

John E. Donahoe, Fort Lauderdale, and Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Steele was disbarred from the practice of law in this state by a decision of this Court reported at 197 So.2d 305 (Fla.1967). Petitioner now seeks reinstatement to the privilege of practicing law pursuant to Article XI, Rule 11.11 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar, 32 F.S.A.

The Referee, after hearing testimony and receiving documentary evidence, recommended that the petition for reinstatement be denied. The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar approved the findings of the Referee and joined in his recommendation that the petition for reinstatement be denied. Therefore, we must determine whether the evidence at the reinstatement hearing justifies an order of reinstatement.

The factual situation upon which we disbarred Mr. Steele is set forth in our opinion appearing at 197 So.2d 305. Consequently, there is no need to restate these factual matters at length. Suffice to say we disbarred Mr. Steele because he advised his client, Mrs. Saba, an uneducated and inexperienced immigrant, to forge certain promissory notes representing a fictitious indebtedness of her husband’s estate, ostensibly to reduce the size of the estate for federal inheritance tax. Actually the estate was insufficient to require the payment of any tax, and the “forged” notes were in fact paid to associates of the petitioner.

During the reinstatement hearing, Mr. Steele testified that all of the funds in question were returned to Mrs. Saba and that she lost nothing by his actions. In fact this was not so and petitioner’s veracity on the point was placed in serious doubt by virtue of his conflicting stories.

Veracity should be the hallmark of an attorney and officer of the Court. It is the foundation of the trust and confidence which must vest in a lawyer.

We must agree with the Referee and The Florida Bar in their recommendation to deny reinstatement. The petition is

Denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
No. 10342.

#### Conklin, Auditor, v. Hills.

Decided May 26, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Delaware county.

*Mr. George W. Carpenter*and *Mr. E. T. Humes,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Marriott & Freshwater,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC98-20-000]


Idaho Power Company; Notice of Filing

December 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 3, 1997, Idaho Power Company tendered 
for filing an application pursuant to Section 203 of the Federal Power 
Act seeking an order authorizing the implementation of a proposed 
corporate reorganization to create a holding company structure. 
Pursuant to the proposed reorganization, Idaho Power Company would 
become a wholly-owned subsidiary of a new parent, IPHC, which has been 
organized under the laws of the State of Idaho.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before January 5, 1998. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the 
protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a 
party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on 
file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34110 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7380 

To cancel the obligation of historically black colleges and universities to 

repay certain capital financing loans, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2020 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, 

Mr. COOPER, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. 

LEE of California, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. CLAY, 

and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To cancel the obligation of historically black colleges and 

universities to repay certain capital financing loans, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HBCU Capital Fi5 nance Debt Relief Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7380 IH

1 SEC. 2. CANCELLATION OF DEBT UNDER HBCU CAPITAL FI2 NANCING PROGRAM. 

3 Not later than 30 days after the date of the enact4 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Education shall cancel 

5 the obligation of each eligible institution (as defined in sec6 tion 342 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

7 1066a)) to repay the balance of interest and principal due 

8 on each loan made under part D of title III of the Higher 

9 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1066 et seq.) before 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

[Opower letterhead] 
 Alexander Laskey 

[address] 
 September 21, 2011 

Dear Alexander: 
 As you may be aware, OPOWER,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), had previously contracted with TriNet Employer Group, a professional employer organization (“TriNet”) for purposes of providing certain Company benefits, as well as
payroll and other human resource management services. The Company’s contract with TriNet will end on October 1, 2011. The purpose of this letter is to confirm your continued employment solely through the Company on the following terms and
conditions: 
  

	 	•	 	Position. Your current position is President, Co-Founder, located in Arlington, VA and you currently report to Daniel Yates. 

  


	 	•	 	Compensation. You currently earn a salary at the rate of $6,041.67 per pay period, which is equivalent to $145,000.00 per year, less all applicable withholdings required by law, payable on the Company’s
regular payroll dates, but not less frequently than monthly. 

  

	 	•	 	Employment Relationship. Employment with the Company is for no specific period of time. Your employment with the Company will be “at will,” meaning that either you or the Company may terminate your
employment at any time and for any reason, with or without cause. Any contrary representations which may have been made to you are superseded by this offer. This is the full and complete agreement between you and the Company on this term. Although
your job duties, title, compensation and benefits, as well as the Company’s personnel policies and procedures, may change from time to time, the “at will” nature of your employment may only be changed in an express written agreement
signed by you and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. 

  

	 	•	 	Withholding Taxes. All forms of compensation referred to in this letter are subject to applicable withholding and payroll taxes. 


 

	 	•	 	 Entire Agreement. Where there is conflict with any prior understandings or agreements, whether oral, written or implied, between you and the
Company or between you and TriNet regarding the matters described in this letter, this letter supersedes and replaces such prior understandings or agreements. Where there are additional terms or conditions of employment within those prior
understandings or agreements, whether oral, written or implied, between you and the Company or between you and TriNet regarding the matters described in this letter, such additional











	 	 
terms or conditions will remain in full force and effect and will be honored by the Company. In addition, your agreement to the terms and conditions set forth in this letter has no effect on the
additional obligations contained in the Confidential Information and Invention Assignment Agreement (“CIIAA”), which is incorporated by reference in this letter, and remains in full force and effect. 



 

									
	Sincerely,	 		 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
		 		 		 		 	
		 		 		 	By:	 	Alexander Laskey
	 /s/ Leah J. Coyne
	 		 		 	
	Leah J. Coyne	 		 		 	
	Director of Human Resources	 		 	 /s/ Alexander Laskey

				
		 		 		 	  

		 		 		 	Date	 	


  
 2
#### Maxie Lee WILLIAMS and Joseph Roosevelt Williams, Petitioners, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40977.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 26, 1971.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1971.

Certiorari dismissed. 243 So.2d 650.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7445 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for home loans 

from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to certain members of the reserve 

components of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. BOST (for himself, Mr. CUNNINGHAM, and Mr. DAVID P. ROE of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility 

for home loans from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

to certain members of the reserve components of the 

Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7445 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE 

2 RESERVE COMPONENTS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES FOR HOME LOANS FROM THE SEC4 RETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Section 3701(b) 

6 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(7) The term ‘veteran’ also includes, for pur9 poses of home loans, an individual who performed 

10 active service (as that term is defined in section 101 

11 of title 10) for a period— 

12 ‘‘(A) of not less than 90 cumulative days; 

13 and 

14 ‘‘(B) that includes 30 consecutive days.’’. 

15 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3702(a)(2) 

16 of such title is amended by adding at the end the following 

17 new subparagraph: 

18 ‘‘(G) Each individual described in section 

19 3701(b)(7) of this title.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Global Investor Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended March, 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr. Joseph J. Louro, the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 14th 2011





/s/ Dr. Joseph J. Louro


Dr. Joseph J. Louro


Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HALA LEWIS HARBY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-802 ) MOHAMED WANIS HARBY, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 25, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Linda H. Babb, Judge. Mark F. Baseman of Felix, Felix & Baseman, LLC, Tampa, for Appellant. Heather A. Harwell of Law Office of Heather A. Harwell, P.A., Wesley Chapel, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, LUCAS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
No. 10284.

#### Nelson et al *v.*Spellacy et al.

Decided April 28, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Messrs.- Ridenour & Halfhill; Mr. Edwin A. Olson*and *Mr. Oscar D. Olson,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Cable & Parmenter,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4242]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act; Meeting

``FEDERAL REGISTER'' CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: [62 FR 6288, 
February 11, 1997].

STATUS: Closed Meeting.

PLACE: 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

DATE PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED: February 11, 1997.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: Deletion/Rescheduling.
    The following item, scheduled for consideration on Friday, February 
14, 1997, has been rescheduled for consideration on Tuesday, February 
18, 1997, following the open meeting, at 10:00 a.m.:
    Regulatory matter bearing enforcement implications.
    Commissioner Wallman, as duty officer, determined that Commission 
business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof 
was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: February 14, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4242 Filed 2-14-97; 3:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Feldschuh, Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

                                                /s/ Stephen Feldschuh
                                                ----------------------
                                                Stephen Feldschuh
                                                Vice President of Operations and
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                November 21, 2005


                                      -14-
No. 10054.

#### The Missionary Society of the Methodist Episcopal Church et al. *v.*Douglass et al., Exrs.

Decided March 10, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Belmont county.

*Mr. W. W. Cozven*and *Mr. John Pollock,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Messrs. Smith & Hozvard*for de*394fendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
MDXG- 2013.12.31 - 10-K EX 10.4 ISO Agmt




MIMEDX GROUP, INC.
ASSUMED 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


Incentive Stock Option Agreement
(Employees)






1.    Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Corporation's Assumed 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), you (the "Participant") have been granted an option (the "Option") to purchase ____________ shares (the "Shares") of our Common Stock as outlined below.


        	
					
	 
	Name of Participant:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Address:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Grant Date:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Number of Shares Subject to Option:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Option Price:
	 
	$
	 

	 
	Type of Option:
	 
	Incentive Stock Option ("ISO")
	 

	 
	Expiration Date (Last day of Option Period):
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Vesting Schedule/Conditions:
	 
	33.33% on
	 

	 
	 
	 
	66.66% on
	 

	 
	 
	 
	100% on
	 






    
       2.    By my signature below, the Participant hereby acknowledges receipt of this Incentive Stock Option Agreement (the "Agreement") and a copy of the Plan, and furthermore, the Participant agrees to be bound by the terms of the Plan and the Agreement.  The Participant understands that the applicable provisions of the Plan are hereby incorporated by reference into the Agreement and constitute a part of the Agreement.  The Corporation reserves the right to treat the Option and the Agreement as cancelled, void and of no effect if the Participant fails to return a signed copy of this Grant Notice within 30 days of receipt of this Grant Notice.




	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Participant:
	 
	 
	Date:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Agreed to by:

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	MiMedx Group, Inc.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	By:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Name: Parker H. Petit

	 
	 
	 
	Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Attest:
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Vice President, Human Resources and Administration
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4348]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
50 CFR Parts 217 and 222

[Docket No. 960730211-7020-02; I.D. 072296B]
RIN 0648-AJ03

North Atlantic Right Whale Protection; Correction

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Interim final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects the preamble to an interim final rule 
(I.D. 072296B) published in the Federal Register of February 13, 1997, 
regarding North Atlantic Right Whale Protection. This correction 
clarifies the exceptions to the requirements of the rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margot Bohan, NMFS/FPR, 301-713-2322; 
Doug Beach, NMFS/Northeast Regional Office, 508-281-9254; or Kathy 
Wang, NMFS/Southeast Regional Office, 813-570-5312.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    As published, a comma was inadvertently left out of the paragraph 
describing the exceptions to the requirements of the rule in the 
SUMMARY. This error changed the meaning of two of the exceptions by 
appearing to combine them into one exception.

Correction

    Accordingly, the publication of the interim final rule FR Doc. 97-
3632, that published on February 13, 1997 (62 FR 6729) is corrected as 
follows:
    On page 6729, in the third column, in the eighth line from the end 
of the SUMMARY, insert a comma after the word ``provided.''

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
Rolland A. Schmitten,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-4348 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert F. Orlich, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                
| |  | -----------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ ROBERTF. ORLICH                            
| |  |                                                
| |  | Robert F. Orlich                               
| |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 27, 2009

The foregoing is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



---
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer of The Banker's Store, Inc., a New York
corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this certificate in connection
with the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30,
2008 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-K").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 22, 2009
        --------------
                                           /s/ Thomas C. Cook
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Thomas C. Cook
                                               Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2







                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
Sinicropi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














 /S/ JOSEPH SINICROPI
 --------------------
Joseph Sinicropi
Chief Financial Officer
July 6, 2007