alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial  information  extracted from Dean Witter
Diversified  Futures Fund III L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      63,721,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  195,823<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,687,386<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,687,386<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,448,680<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,282,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,166,040
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,166,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,166,040
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $195,823.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $1,769,839.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $536,350, accrued management fee
of $164,947 and accrued administrative expenses payable of $97,351.
<F4>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $16,344,815,
net change in unrealized of $(9,385,547) and interest income of $2,489,412.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Cherry 

, J. 

of the HOA lien." Here, appellant's complaint alleged that the foreclosure 

sale was conducted pursuant to NRS Chapter 116, and the record is silent 

as to whether respondent was sent the notices referenced in NRS 

116.31162 through NRS 116.31168. The record is likewise silent as to 

whether respondent attempted to pay off Southern Highlands Community 

Association's lien before Southern Highlands' foreclosure sale. Thus, we 

conclude that it was improper for the district court to base its denial of 

injunctive relief on its two aforementioned findings. We therefore 

VACATE the order denying preliminary injunctive relief and 

REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings 

consistent with this order.' 

Hardesty 

Douglas 

CHERRY, J., concurring: 

For the reasons stated in the SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. 

U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. , 334 P.3d 408 (2014), dissent, I disagree 

that respondent lost its lien priority by virtue of the homeowners 

association's nonjudicial foreclosure sale. I recognize, however, that SFR 

Investments is now the controlling law and, thusly, concur in the 

disposition of this appeal. 

, J. 

'The injunction imposed by our June 18, 2013, order is vacated. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Allan R. Earl, District Judge 

Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. 

Akerman LLP/Las Vegas 

Miles, Bauer, Bergstrom & Winters, LLP 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A e
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Jon Leibowitz, Chairman

J. Thomas Rosch 

Edith Ramirez

Julie Brill PUBLIC

In the Matter of

McWANE, INC., 

 a corporation, and 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

 a limited partnership. 

 Docket No. 9351

 

ORDER

On February 23, 2012, all claims in this matter against Respondent Star Pipe Products,

Ltd. (“Respondent Star”) were by order withdrawn from adjudication for the purpose of

considering a proposed consent agreement. Under the February 23, 2012 Order, all proceedings

in this matter as they pertain to Respondent Star are scheduled to revert to Part 3 adjudicative

status at 12:01 a.m. on Saturday, March 31, 2012. To facilitate further consideration of a

proposed consent agreement, the Commission has decided to further extend the withdrawal of

Respondent Star from adjudication in this matter. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.25(c) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 16

C.F.R. § 3.25(c), that all claims against Respondent Star, as set forth in the First Violation

Alleged and the Second Violation Alleged in the Complaint will remain withdrawn in their

entirety from adjudication until 12:01 a.m. on June 1, 2012, at which time Respondent Star will

return to adjudicative status under Part 3 of the Commission Rules of Practice.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

Issued: March 29, 2012
No. 10262.

#### The Lewis Coal & Coke Co. *v.*Smith, Admr.

Decided February 25, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Jefferson county.

*Mr. W. B. Francis*and *Mr. P. P. Lezvis,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. E. E. Erskine, Mr. William Dixon*and *Mr. Carl H. Smith,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

2013 Bonus and 2014 Compensation Information for Named Executive Officers 

Robert Blum, President & CEO: base salary $555,000; 2013 bonus award $249,750; 2014 target bonus 60% of salary. 

Sharon Barbari, Exec. Vice President, Finance & CFO: base salary $402,730; 2013 bonus award $140,760; 2014 target bonus 40% of salary. 

David Cragg, Sr. Vice President, Human Resources: base salary $286,340; 2013 bonus award $75,060; 2014 target bonus 35% of salary. 

Fady Malik, Sr. Vice President, Research and Early Development: base salary $390,500; 2013 bonus award $98,513; 2014 target bonus 35% of salary. 

Andrew Wolff, Sr. Vice President, Clinical Research and Development and Chief Medical Officer: base salary $388,000; 2013 bonus award $108,640; 2014 target
bonus 35% of salary.
#### MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-17.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 16, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 25, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4171]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Army Education Advisory Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Army War College.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (P.L. 92-463), announcement is made of the following 
committee meeting:

    Name of Committee: U.S. Army War College Subcommittee of the Army 
Education Advisory Committee.
    Date of Meeting: April 7, 8, and 9, 1997.
    Place: Root Hall, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, 
Pennsylvania.
    Time: 8:30 A.M.-5:00 P.M.
    Proposed Agenda: Receive information briefings, view facilities, 
observe classes, conduct discussions with faculty and students, and 
provide guidance concerning accreditation and areas for improvement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colonel Terry J. Young, Box 118, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle 
Barracks, PA 17013 or phone (717) 245-3907.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee after receiving advance approval for participation. To 
request advance approval or obtain further information, contact Colonel 
Terry J. Young at the above address or phone number.

Gregory D. Showalter,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4171 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
# THEA~TORNEYGENERAI~ OF TEXAS AUSTXN. Traeas 78711
February 21. 1974 The Honorable Joe Resweber County Attorney Harris County Courthouse Houston, Texas 77002

Dear Mr. Resweber: Opinion No. H- 235 Re: Is the county clerk authorized and required tocollect fees for filing instruments submitted pursuant to the Campaign Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1973? The question you have s,ubmitted to us is:

“Is the county clerk authorized and required to collect fees for filing instruments submitted pursuant~to the Campaign Reporting and Disclosure Act of 19737 ” The Campaign Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1973 (Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 423, p. 1101)amends various Articles ofChapter 14of the Election Code, V. T. C.S. The amendments, effective June 11, 1973, require various filings, some with the Secretary ofState, some with the County Clerk, and others elsewhere. As amended, Article 14.02(b) ofthe Texas Election Code requires candidates and political committees in county elections to designate a campaign manager and file the written appointment with the county clerk. Amended Article 14.08 requires candidates and political committees tofile financial statements. Inelections for a county office or ona measure submitted toa county election, the statements are tobefiled with the county clerk.

p. 1094The Honorable Joe Resweber, page 2 (H-235)

The Campaign Reporting andDisclosure Act of 1973makes no provision for afee tothe county clerk for these filings. Nor is there any specific provision in those statutes covering thefees ofcounty clerks. See Articles 3930, 3930a-1, and 3930(b), Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes. However, Article 3930 provides: “County clerks
. . . are hereby authorized and required tocollect thefollowing fees for services rendered by them toall persons, firms, corporations, legal entities, governmental agencies and/or governmental representatives:

1%

. . . .

“(9) For such other duties prescribed, authorized, and/or permitted bythe Legislature for which nofee is set by this Act, reasonable fees shall be charged. I’(emphasis added) We therefore answer your question that the county clerk is authorized tocollect fees for filing instruments submitted under the Campaign Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1973. Further we believe the language ofthe above quoted portion ofArticle 3930 is mandatory and that county clerks are required tocollect reasonable fees. See 53 Tex. Jur. Zd, Statutes, $16 and cases cited. SUMMARY County clerks are required tocollect reasonable fees’for filing instruments submitted under the Campaign Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1973. Very truly yours,

Attorney General ofTexas

pi 1095The Honorable Joe Resweber, page 3 (H-235)



# \ k ) Opinion Committee

p. 1096
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-050-1020-00]


Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 
(FACA), 5 U.S.C. Appendix, notice is hereby given that the next meeting 
of the Front Range Resource Advisory Council (Colorado) will be held on 
January 15, 1998 in Canon City, Colorado.
    The meeting is scheduled to begin at 9:15 a.m. at the Holycross 
Abbey Community Center, 2951 E. Highway 50, Canon City, Colorado. The 
primary topic of the meeting will be an update on implementation of the 
Guidelines for Livestock Grazing Management.
    All Resource Advisory Council meetings are open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral statements to the Council at 9:30 a.m. 
or written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. 
The District Manager may limit the length of oral presentations 
depending on the number of people wishing to speak.

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for Thursday January 15, 1998 from 9:15 
a.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Canon City District Office, 
3170 East Main Street, Canon City, Colorado 81212; Telephone (719) 269-
8500; TDD (719) 269-8597.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ken Smith at (719) 269-8553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summary minutes for the Council meeting will 
be maintained in the Canon City District Office and will be available 
for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours 
within thirty (30) days following the meeting.

    Dated: December 16, 1997.
Donnie R. Sparks,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-33817 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
**EXHIBIT15**

 

REPORTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Cubic Corporation

 

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidatedbalance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of June 30, 2009, and the related condensed consolidatedstatements of income and cash flows for the three and nine month periods ended June 30,2009 and 2008.  These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance withstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates).  A review of interim financialinformation consists principally of applying analytical procedures, and makinginquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than anaudit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is theexpression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such anopinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of anymaterial modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S.generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We have previously audited, in accordancewith the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates), the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30,2008 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in ourreport dated December 2, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion onthose consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information setforth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30,2008, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to theconsolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNGLLP

 

 

San Diego, California

August 5, 2009

 

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION***


**(Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officers of WindsorTech, Inc. hereby certify, to such
      officers’ knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of WindsorTech, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies
      with the with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                November 14, 2005
            
            /s/
                Marc ShermanMarc
                Sherman
              Chairman
                of the Board and
              Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                November 14, 2005
            
            /s/
                Edward L. CummingsEdward
                L. Cummings
              Chief
                Financial Officer





__________________


*
      The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mark J. LAMARTINIERE.

No. 61621.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Tangipahoa.

Granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Gordon E. Causey, Judge of the 21st Judicial District Court, for the Parish of Tangipa-hoa, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 31st day of March, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

*940It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this court, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[PF-710A; FRL-5591-4]


Appropriate Technology Limited; Pesticide Tolerance Petition 
Filing

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of filing; Technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is correcting the time for the submission of comments on 
the notice of filing of a pesticide petition proposing the 
establishment of a regulation exempting from the requirement of a 
tolerance residues of extracts from Quercus falcata (red oak) Rhus 
aromatic (sumac), Rhizophora mangle (mangrove), and Opuntia lindheimeri 
(prickly pear cactus). The petition was submitted by Appropriate 
Technology Limited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Teung F. Chin, Biopesticides 
and Pollution Prevention Division, (7501W), Office of Pesticide 
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, 
DC 20460. Office location, telephone number, and e-mail address: 5th 
Floor, CS #1, 2800 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, 703-308-1259, e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e2d262720603a2b3b20290e2b3e2f232f2722602b3e2f60292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="197a717077376d7c6c777e597c697874787075377c6978377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    In FR Doc. 97-3517, appearing at page 6777 in the issue for 
Thursday, February 13, 1997, the comment period under ``DATES'' is 
corrected to read as March 17, 1997.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection.

Dated: February 19, 1997.

Janet L. Andersen,

Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of 
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 97-4622 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Each of the undersigned, in his or her capacity as an officer of CubicCorporation hereby certifies that:

 

1.                    The report of Cubic Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”), which accompanies thiscertification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934.

 

2.                    The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe Registrant at the end of such quarter and the results of operations of theRegistrant for such quarter.

 

 
| /S/ W. J. Zable         |                    | /S/ W.W. Boyle |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|----------------|--------|
| W. J. Zable             | W. W. Boyle             |
| Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |                    |
| Date: February 7, 2005  |                    |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40774

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL SEAN ANOMAN, also known as Mike Jones, also known as

Joseph James Anoman,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:05-CR-31-19

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Sean Anoman has

requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Anoman has filed a

response. Although Anoman asserts that his counsel provided

ineffective assistance, the record is insufficiently developed to

allow consideration of this issue on direct appeal. See United

States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987). Our

independent review of the brief, Anoman’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
No. 06-40774

-2-

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Anoman’s request for the appointment of a new attorney is

DENIED.