p. 1 

# OAR Box 1208 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 119 ) ll-E- 5 Docket Number: 

# A-89-1 0

Printed 5/9/200810:08:23 AM

Sheet 119of 127.. . LA WOFFICE S PHILI PJ . HARTE R

SUIT E 40 4 230 1 M STREET . N.W . WASHINGTON . D.C . 2003 7 (202 ) 887-103 3 FAX : (202 ) 887.103 6 

### Octobe r 5 , 198 9 MEMORAND U P. 2



# A-89 - 4 1 

# i II-E- 5 

# C.JLiJlJJjiji ;
EP AAI R DOCKE T
To : EP A NegotiatedRulemaking Committee o nFugitive Emission s fro

mEquipmen

t Leaks an dIntereste dPartie s Fr : Phili p J . Harter Re : Minute s o

f Septembe

r 27-2 8 Meeting ; Future Meeting s I enclos e the minute s o

f the Septembe

r 27-2 8 meeting tha

t wer e prepare db

y Radia n Corporatio nunde

r contract t o EPA . The minute s als o includ e the documents tha

t wer e distribute da

t the meeting , the Resourc e Pool Protocols , an dalist o f committee mem

bers . I a mincludin

g th e revisedDraf

t Organizationa

l Protocol s (Attachmen

t 5 t o the minutes) ; I hop e I capture dthe spirit o f the discussion s o

nThursday , bu

t pleas e rea

d the mcarefull y t o be sure . I a

mals o enclosin

g aslightl y expandedlist

o f committee members tha

t define s wh

o variou s committee members represent an dstaf f t o who m material s shouldbe sen

t fo r broa ddistributio n withi

na norganization . There wil l b e aworkgrou

p meeting o

nTuesday , Octobe

r 2 4 a t EP A i nDurha*m

. The addres s i s the Mutua

l Building , 41 1 W

. Chapel Hil

l Street . I

t wil l begi na t 10:00 . The meeting wil

l addres s technica

l issues , includin

g wha t dat ai s available , wha

t datai s needed , an

dmodelin g approache s t

o MACT . Al

l committee members are welcome . The nex t committee meeting wil

l b e o n Novembe

r 6 an d7 . I t wil l be a t the Picke t Suit e Hotel , 251 5 Meridian , Durham , N C 27713 ; 919-361-4660 . A bloc k o f rooms has beenreserved ; whe

nmaking areservation , sa y yo u are wit hthe "EP A Fugitives " meeting . Pleas e call soo

nto mak e reservations . The meeting wil l begi na t 10:0 0 o nMon
day , Novembe

r 6 an dwil l rununtil 5:00 ; w

e wil l begi na t 9:0 0 o nTuesda y an dconclud e a t 4:00 . The committee als o scheduledmeeting s fo r Decembe

r 6- 7 an dJanuar y 17-1 8 a t place s to b e determined .P. 3

REGULATOR YNEGOTIATIO N MEETINGO

N FUGITIV E EQUIPMEN T LEAK S SEPTEMBE R27-28 , 198 9 QUALIT YHOTEL-CAPITO L HIL L WASHINGTON , D.C .

DRAF T MEETINGMINUTE S The purpose o f thes e meetin g note s i s t o provide a novervie w o f the issue s discusse dandt o provid e a ninforma l recor do f decision s a s the y pertai nt o schedules , actio nitem s andpreliminar y committe e directions . Thes e summar y

note s ar e organize dchronologicall y usin g the meetin g agend a a s a guideline . Al l presentatio nmaterial s distribute ddurin g the two-da y meetin g ar e attached , andinclude : Attachmen t 1 Attachmen t 2 Attachmen t 3 Meetin g Agend a Attendance Lis t Septembe r 27 , 198 9 Backgroun dBriefing : Handou t prepare dby EPA "Equipmen t Lea k Regulator y Negotiation " Attachmen t 4 : Lis t o f Committe e Member s Attachmen t 5 : Draf t Organizationa l Protocol s (Revise dbase d o nSeptembe r 2 8 discussions ) Attachmen t 6 : Resourc e Poo l Protocol s Attachmen t 7 : Negotiatio nWorksho pAgenda: • Outlin e o f topic s and activitie s covere di nsessio nb y Jonatha nMarks , ENDISPUTE , Incorporate d Attachmen t 8 : Emissio nEstimatio nBriefing : Handou t prepare db y EPA "Propose dRefinement s t o EP A Procedure s fo r Estimatin g Equipmen t Leaks "
Wednesday . Septembe r 2 7 Backgroun dBriefing :

- Bo bAja xo f EP A gav e a presentatio n(Attachmen t 3 ) o nequipmen t leak s andth e rol e o f th e Regulator y Negotiatio n(Re g Neg ) Committee .P. 4

• A s described , the scop e o f the Re g Ne g Committe e i s t o addres s Equipmen t Leak s wit hrespec t t o thre e areas : 1 ) Emissio nFactor s andEstimatin g Technique s 2 ) Standard s Reflectin g MAC T 3 ) Forma t fo r Risk-base dStandard s

• EPA wil l us e the Re g Ne g agreement s o nequipmen t leak s a s the basi s fo r the propose drulemakin g fo r the Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) categories . Th e Re g Ne g Committee' s missio ni s t o defin e Maximu m Achievabl e Contro l Technolog y (MACT ) consisten t wit hthe technology-base d standar dapproac houtline di nthe Administration' s propose damendment s t o Sectio n11 2 o f the Clea nAi r Ac t [Hous e Bil l - H.R . 303 0 andSenat e Bil l - S.1490] . EPA expect s tha t the standar dwil l appl y t o sourc o categorie s se t fort hi nthe propose dClea nAi r Ac t Amendments , instea do f a limite dnumbe r o f liste dpollutants . Th e standard s wil l b e technology-based , no t risk-based .
Committe e Composition :

- Ther e wa s a nope ndiscussio ninvolvin g committe e member s and observer s t o determin e i f al l possible interest s wer e represente db y

th e Re g Ne g Committee . There wer e n o additiona l interest s identifie dan dn o objection s t o th e committe e composition . Th e committe e member s andthei r affiliations , includin g the facilitator , ar e liste di nAttachmen t 4 .P. 5

Fou r genera l interest s ar e represente do nthe Re g Ne g Committee : 1 ) Industr y

(includin g chemicals , pharmaceuticals , rubber , andoil ) 2 ) State/Loca l Governmen t 3 ) Environmenta l Group s 4 ) EPA Nichola s Garci a fro m Offic e O f Managemen t andBudge t i s participatin g i nthe Re g Ne g proceeding s a s a nobserver . Tw o group s wit hspecifi c interest s wer e presen t an dexpresse da desir e t o participate a s observers . Thes e partie s include : 1 ) Th e America nPetroleu m Institut e 2 ) Independen t Liqui dTerminal s Associatio n
Organizationa l Protocol :

- A draf t organizationa l protoco l wa s distribute danddiscussed . Committe e member s andobserver s propose drevision s t o severa l clauses , anddiscussion s o nthos e propose drevision s followed . Base do nthe propose drevision s andcommitte e comments , a revise d draf t protoco l wa s distribute do nThursday , Septembe r 28 . Discussion s o n Thursda y

continue dwit hrecommendation s fo r furthe r revisions . Attachmen t S contain s a revise ddraf t protoco l reflectin g th e change s propose di nth e Thursday , Septembe r 28 , discussions . Resourc e Poo X

- Resource poo l protocol s were distributed , anda cop y i s include d a s Attachmen t 6 .P. 6

- A brie f overvie w

o f the resourc e poo l wa s provided . Th e purpos e o f th e poo l i s t o provid e fund s fo r short-ter m researc ho r technica l support , an dt o defra y

extraordinar y

expense s associate dwit hparticipatio ni n the negotiations . Worksho po nNegotiatio n

- Jonatha nMark s o f ENDISPUTE , Incorporated , conducte da worksho p o nnegotiatio ntheor y andpractice . Th e worksho pagend a i s include da s Attachmen t 7 .
Thursday . Septembe r 2 8 Organizationa l Protoco l

- Discussio ncontinue do nspecifi c part s o f the draf t organizationa l protocol . Phi l Harter , the facilitator , agree dt o addres s unresolve d concern s i na revise ddraft . Attachmen t 5 contain s the revise ddraft . Wor k Pla nFo r MAC T

- Discussion s wer e initiate do nway s t o accomplis hthe committee' s missio nwit hrespec t t o definin g MAC T fo r equipmen t leaks . BobAja x reiterate dtha t the focu s o f the Re g Ne g effor t wa s t o defin e MAC T fo r fugitiv e equipmen t lea k emission s coverin g HON sourc e categories . MAC T shoul db e determine dusin g the definition s andguideline s i nth e Administration' s propose dClea nAi r Ac t Amendments . Th e EP A i s simultaneousl y

followin g a traditiona l rulemakin g proces s fo r addressin g MAC T fo r proces s vents , storag e an dtransfer , an dwaste wate r treatmen t fo r thes e same sourc e categories . The successfu l agreemen t fro

m thi s Re g Ne g wil l be the basi s fo r equipmen t leak s regulation s tha t wil l the nb e combine dwit hstandard s fo r th e othe r emissio npoint s i nthe HO N rulemakin g proposal .P. 7

EPA presente dthought s o nho w the MAC T developmen t coul dprocee d independen t o f emissio nfacto r developmen t work . Becaus e the numbe r o r percentag e o f leak s i s the paramete r tha t i s directl y measured , a MACT-base dperformanc e standar dcoul db e define dusin g format s suc ha s numbe r o f componen t leak s o r the percentag e o f leakin g components . Severa l o f the committe e member s wer e uncertai nwhethe r MAC T coul dbe develope dindependen t o f emissio nfacto r developmen t work . To m Kittlema no f CM

A describe da conceptua l mode l tha t coul db e use dto develo pemissio nrates . Th e mode l woul dconside r factor s suc ha s the frequenc y

o f leak s i neac ho f severa l lea k rat e ranges , the relation shi pbetwee nemission s andscreenin g factors , andrelationship s betwee n lea k rate s andtime . Lind a Curra no f Amoc o Oi l helpe ddescrib e the approac handnote dtha t Amoc o wa s currentl y studyin g a simila r modelin g approach . CM

A andEPA

agree dt o hav e a technica l workin g meetin g o n Octobe r 2 4 t o discus s furthe r detail s o f th e CM A model . I ncooperatio nwit hCMA , EP A ha s develope da fairl y comprehensiv e emission s dat a bas e coverin g a numbe r o f equipmen t type s andservices . Preliminar y

analyse s o f the dat a identifie dfew significan t correlation s betwee nhardwar e andemissions . Thes e preliminar y analyse s ar e containe di na repor t prepare dfo r EP A b y Radia n Corporation . EP A wil l mak e thi s repor t availabl e t o intereste d committe e members . AP I ha s recentl y

initiate da study t o loo k int o factor s affectin g equipmen t lea k emission s a t refineries . Becaus e o f limite dtime , andthe difficult y o f developin g a focuse d plan , the committe e agree dt o dela y developin g a wor k pla nunti l theP. 8

November meeting . Before th e November meeting , EP A an dcommittee member s wil l develo pa regulator

y outlin e o f idea s o f possibl e format s fo r MACT . Schedul e an

dLocatio

no f Meeting s

- Octobe r 24 ; Durham , NorthCarolina , EPA/Mutua l Building , technica l workin g meetin

g fo r intereste

dcommittee members/partie s t o discus s modelin g approac

ht o MACT .

- Novembe r 6 an

d7 ; Researc

hTriangl e Park , NorthCarolina , Hote l meetin g locatio nt o b e determined , bloc k o f room s wil l b

e reserved .

- Decembe r 6 an

d7 ; Locatio

nt o be determine

dat th e Novembe r meeting .

• Januar

y 1 7 an d18 ; Locatio

nt o b e determine

da t th e Novembe r meeting .

- Meeting s date s fo r February , March , an dApri l wil l b

e determine

da t th e November meeting . Emissio nFactor s

- Davi dMarkword t o f EP A gav e a briefin

g o nequipment lea

k emissio

n estimatio

nprocedure s an

dth e nee dfo r improve

dQA/QC procedures . Recommendation s for a join t EPA-industr y samplin

g progra

m wer e proposed . Attachmen t 8 contain s a cop y o f th e presentatio

nhandout .

- There wer e severa l question s about th e propose

dsamplin

g matri xan

d rational e fo

r selectio

no f th e number o f component s t o be screene

dan d selectio

no f concentratio

nranges ._E_9 _

- Eac ho f the industr y association s agree dt o contac t thei r constituent s i norde r t o identif y facilitie s tha t ar e currentl y plannin g o r carryin g ou t screenin g andbaggin g measuremen t programs , andask fo r thei r participatio ni nestablishin g a qualit y assure ddat a bas e fo r us e i n emissio nfacto r development . Meetin g Conclusion s andActio nItem s

- EPA wil l distribut e it s equipmen t lea k dat a bas e t o committe e member s wh o hav e requeste dit .

- EPA wil l distribut e the Radia nReport .

- Phi l Harte r wil l prepar e a revise ddraf t o f th e Organizationa l Protocol .

- A technica l workin g meetin g wil l be hel di nDurham , Nort hCarolina, o nOctobe r 2 4 a t 10:0 0 a.m . Th e meetin g wil l b e i nEPA' s 5t hfloo r conferenc e roo

m i nthe N C Mutua l Insuranc e Buildin g a t 41 1 Wes t Chape l Hil l Stree t t o discus s existin g dat a andthe emissio nmode l propose d by CMA .

- EPA andothe r committe e member s wil l prepar e a noutlin e fo r developin g MAC T an dwil l b e prepare dt o discus s i t a t th e Novembe r meeting .

- EPA wil l develo pthe availabl e phosgene , EO , andB ddat a i ndifferen t format s an ddistribut e the ni nmid-October .

- CM A wil l contac t it s constituents , identif y facilitie s tha t ar e currentl y

involve di ndat a collectio nprograms , an dreques t thei r participatio ni nthe committee' s collectio nprogram .P.1 0 

### 1



# hTTmUMEMf

. EKTVIRONMEKITA

LPROTECTIO N AGEKIC Y NEGOTIATIN GCOKMITTS S FOR COB3TRO LO FFUGITIV S EMISSION S O FVOC s FRO M EQUIPKDSO

T LEAKS AGEND A Wednesday . Septembe r 2 7 9sO O Cal l t o Order s Introductio n o f Attendee s 9s1 5 Background briefing s Revie wo f th e curren t rul e an d emissio n factors ; nee d fo r revision ; potentia l alternativ e approache s 10s1 5 Coffe e Brea k 10s3 0 Discussio n o f th e compositio n o f th e committee s interest s t o b e represente d lis3 0 Organizationa l Protocol s 12s0 0 Resourc e Poo l an d it s Protocol s 12s3 0 Lunc h Serve d Is3 0 Introductio n t o negotiatin g publi c polic yissue s fo r member s o f th e committe e an d thei r alternate s Thursday . Septembe r 2 8 9s0 0 Develo p a wor k pla n fo r negotiatin g MAC T ° Scop e o f th e rul e ° Issue s t o b e negotiate d « Wha t dat a i s neede d fo r thei r resolutio n ° Ho wi s th e dat a t o b e obtaine d ° Hot ? i s th e dat a t o b e organize d and reviewe d f preliminaril y o Orde r o r priorit yfo r thei r discussio n 12s3 0 Lunc h serve d Is0 0 Emissio n factors s sam e issue s a s fo r MAC T 4s3 0 Schedul e an

d locatio n o f meeting s 5s0 0 Adjour nP.1 1
Septembe r 29 , 198 9 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENC Y NEGOTIATING COMMITTE E FO R CONTRO L O F FUGITIVE EMISSION S O F VOC s FRO M EQUIPMENT LEAK S COMMITTE E MEMBER S Chemical s Bruc e V . Bower s 302-834-453 6 Standar d Chlorin e P.O . Bo x 31 9 Delawar e City , D E 1970 6 FA X Davi d W . Dunn 409-942-312 9 Sterlin g Chemica l Corp . P.O . Bo x 131 1 Texa s City , T X 7759 2 FAX : 409-942-344 8 Thoma s A . Kittlema n 302-366-471 8 

### Representing Chemical Manufacturers Association E.I . DuPon t d e Nemour s & Co . Engineerin g Departmen t Louvier s Buildin g Newark , D E 1971 4 FAX : Kare n Fidle r 202-887-129 0 

### Staff to CMA; send

materials for

CMA distribution Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n 250 1 M Stree t N.W . Washington , D C 2003 7 FAX : 202-887-123 7 Environmenta l Davi d Donige r 202-783-780 0 Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l Suit e 30 0 135 0 Ne wYor k Avenu e N W Washington , D C 2000 5 FAX : Alle n Hershkowit z 212-727-446 5 Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l 4 0 W . 20t h Stree t Ne wYork , Ne wYor k 1001 1 FAX : 212-727-177 3 

# JP.1 2

EP A Rober t Aja x 919-541-557 9 MD-1 3 Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park , NC 2771 1 FAX : 919-541-566 1 Debora h Dalto n 202-382-549 5 PM-22 3 Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 40 1 M Stree t S W Washington , D C 2046 0 FAX : 202-382-788 3 Facilitato r Phili p J . Harte r 202-887-103 3 Suit e 40 4 230 1 M Stree t N

W Washington , D C 2003 7 FAX : 202-887-103 6 Oi l Lind a Curra n 312-420-488 9 Amoc o Oi l Compan

y Warrenvill e Roa d & Mil l Stree t Naperville , I L 6054 0 FAX : 312-420-369 8
Pharmaceu t i ca1 s Jac k Kac e 201-235-377 4 Representin

g the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association Director , Environmenta l Affair s Hoffmann-LaRoche , Inc . 34 0 Kingsland Stree t Nutley , N

J 0711 0 FAX : 201-235-760 6 Rubbe r Alfre d W . Bicku

m216-796-153 4 Representing International Inst, of

Synthetic Rubber

Producers Manager , Valu e Engineerin g Goodyea rP.1 3

114 4 E . Marke t Stree t Akron , O H 4431 6 FAX : 216-796-645 9 State/loca l Government s Gustav e Vo n Bodunge n 504-342-904 7 Ai r Qualit yDivisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yan d Nuclea r Energ

y Departmen t o f Environmenta l Qualit y P.O . Bo x 4409 6 Bato n Rouge , L

A7080 4 FAX : 504-342-904 8 Anupo mGangul i 818-572-218 3 Sout h Coas t Ai r Qualit yManagemen t Distric t 915 0 Flai r Driv e E l Monte , CA FAX : Rober t V . Majewsk i 518-457-768 8 NYSDE C 5 0 Wol f Roa d Albany , N

Y 12233-325 5 FAX : Le s Montgomer y512-451-571 1 Texa s Ai r Contro l Boar d 633 0 Highwa y29 0 Eas t Austin , T X 7872 3 FAX : 512-451-571 1 Harve l Roger s 502-584-815 1 Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Distric t 91 4 Eas t Boardway Louisville , KY 4020 4 FAX :P.1 4



### Draf t Septembe r 29 , 198 9 ENVIRONMENTA

L PROTECTIO

NAGENC Y NEGOTIATIN

G COMMITTE E FOR CONTRO L O F FUGITIV

E EMISSION S O F VO C FROM EQUIPMEN T LEAK S ORGANIZATIONA

L PROTOCOL S PARTICIPANT S a . Interest s Represented . An yinteres t tha t woul d b e sub
stantiall yaffecte d b ya n EP Arul e wit h respec t t o the contro l o f fugitive emission s o f volatil e organi c com pound s (VOCs ) fro

mequipmen t leak s ma yb e a part yt o th e negotiations . * b . Additiona l Parties . Afte r negotiation s hav e begun , addi
tiona l partie s ma

yjoi n th e Committe e onl ywit h th e con currenc e o f th e Committe e an d i f withi n th e numbe r o f partie s permitte d unde r th e Committee' s charter . c . Th e Negotiatin

g Committee . Th e Negotiating Committe e shal l b e compose d o f on e representative fro meac h organi
zation tha t i s a part yt o th e negotiation . Eac h part yma y designat e a Committe e Membe r an d a n alternate . d . Attendanc e a t Meetings . Th e Committe e Membe r fo r eac h part yo r an alternat e mus t mak e a goo d fait h effor t t o atten d eac h ful l negotiating session . Th e Committe e Membe r ma

yb e accompanie d b

ysuc h othe r individual s a s th e Committe e Membe r believe s i s appropriat e t o represen t his/he r interest . Onl yth e Committe e Membe r o r th e alternat e wil l hav e th e privileg e o f sittin g a t th e negotiatin

g tabl e an

d o f speaking fro

m th e floo r during th e negotiation s withou t Committe e approval , excep t tha t (1 ) an yCommitte e Membe r ma ycal l upo n a technica l advise r t o elaborat e o n a relevan t point , an d (2 ) pursuan t t o th e Federa l Advisor

yCommitte e Act , an yperso n attending th e meeting s o f th e Committe e ma yaddres s th e Committe e i f time permits . e . Constituents ' Interests . Committe e Member s ar e expecte d t o represen t th e concern s an d interest s o f thei r constituent s an

d t o ensur e tha t an yagreemen t develope d b y th e Committe e i s acceptable , t o th e organizatio n whic h th e Committe e Membe r represents . DECISIONMAKIN

G a . Consensus . Th e Committe e wil l operat e b yconsensus . Com mitte e decision s wil l b e mad e onl ywit h th e concurrenc e o f al l partie s represented .P.1 5

b . Workgroups . Smalle r workin g group s mayb e forme d t o ad
dres s specifi c issue s an d t o mak e recommendation s t o th e Committee . Workin g Group s ar e ope n t o an yCommitte e Membe r or - th e member' s designee , plu s suc h othe r individual s a s th e Committe e believe s woul d enhanc e th e functionin g o f th e Workin g Groups . Workin g group s ar e no t authorize d t o mak e decision s fo r th e Committe e a s a whole . Thei r meeting s wil l b e hel d betwee n th e ful l session s and wil l b e schedule d i n th e sam e locatio n an d tim e wheneve r possible . Al l Committe e Member s wil l b e notifie d o f al l workin g group meetings . c . Discontinu e i f unproductive . The ' Committe e maydiscon
tinu e negotiation s a t an ytim e i f the yd o no t appea r pro ductive . 3 . AGREEMENT a . Writte n Statemen t a s Basi s fo r NPRM . Th e agreemen t wil l tak e th e for

mo f a writte n statemen t tha t wil l b e signe d b yal l Committe e Members . EPAwil l us e th e writte n statemen t a s th e basi s o f propose d regulation(s ) tha t wil l appl yt o source s o f emission s tha t ar e withi n th e scop e o f th e writte n statement . b . Fina l Rule . I t i s EPA' s inten t t o promulgat e a fina l rul e consisten t wit h th e writte n statemen t unles s comment s submitte d i n respons e t o th e Notic e o f Propose d Rulemakin g requir e change s i n th e proposal . EPAwil l submi t th e draf t fina l rul e t o th e Committe e Member s wh o wil l hav e 4 5 day s t o fil e comments . c . Suppor t fo r Propose d an d Fina l Rule . Th e partie s othe r tha n EPAinten

d t o suppor t th e propose d an d fina l rul e t o th e exten t consisten t wit h th e writte n statement . FACILITATO R Aneutra l facilitato r wil l wor k wit h al l th e partie s t o en sur e tha t th e proces s run s smoothly . Th e facilitato r serve s a t th e wil l o f th e Committee . MEETING S a . FACA . Th e negotiation s wil l b e conducte d unde r th e Feder
a l Advisor yCommitte e Ac t (FACA) . b . Ope n Meetings . Negotiatin g session s wil l b e announce d i n th e Federa l Registe r prio r t o th e meetin g and , consisten t wit h FACArequirements , wil l b e ope n t o th e public . c . Minutes . Th e proceeding s wil l no t b e electronicall yre -P.1 6

corded , bu t draf t minute s o f Committe e meeting s wil l b e kep t an d approve d b

yth e Committee . Th e minute s wil l b e mad e availabl e t o th e publi c o n request . d . Agendas . Meetin g agenda s wil l als o b e develope d b ycon sensus . Th e Committe e wil l determin e i f informatio n re quest s ar e reasonabl e an d relevant . e . Impasse . I f a deadloc k o r impass e i s declare d b yan y party , th e facilitato r wil l b e availabl e t o hel p th e dead
locke d partie s t o tryt o resolv e th e impasse . f . Caucus . Acaucu s ca n b e declare d a t an ytime . 6 . SAFEGUARD S FO R TH E PARTIE S a . Goo d Faith . Al l partie s agre e t o ac t i n goo d fait h i n al l aspect s o f thes e negotiations . Specifi c offers , posi
tions , o r statement s mad e durin g th e negotiation s mayno t b e use d b

yothe r partie s fo r an ypurpos e outsid e th e negotiation s o r a s a basi s fo r futur e litigation . I t i s th e inten t o f th e Committe e tha t othe r attendee s o f th e Committee' s meeting s als o voluntaril ycompl ywit h thi s provisio n i n orde r t o suppor t th e regulator ynegotiatio n proces s b

yencouragin g th e fre e an d ope n exchang e o f ideas , views , an d informatio n prio r t o achievin g consensus . Persona l attack s an d prejudice d statement s wil l no t b e tolerated . b . Righ t t o Withdraw . An ypart ymaywithdra wfromth e nego tiation s a t an

ytim e withou t prejudice . c . Others ' Positions . N o part ywil l mak e publi c announce ment s o r hol d discussion s wit h th e pres s characterizin g th e positio n o f an yothe r part yeve n i f tha t part ywith
draw s fromth e negotiations . d . Information . (1 ) Al l partie s agre e no t t o withhol d relevan t informa
tion . I f a part ybelieve s i t canno t o r shoul d no t releas e suc h information , i t wil l provid e th e sub
stanc e o f th e informatio n i n som e for m (suc h a s b

y aggregatin g data , b ydeletin g non-relevan t confiden
tia l information , b yprovidin g summaries , o r b yfur
nishin g i t t o a neutra l consultan t t o us e o r abstract ) o r a genera l descriptio n o f i t an d th e reaso n fo r no t providin g i t directly . Emissio n dat a shal l b e treate d a s provide d b

y4 0 CF R § 2.30 1 an d canno t b e considere d confidential . (2 ) Partie s wil l provid e informatio n calle d fo r b ythi s paragrap h a s muc h i n advanc e o f th e meetin g a t whic h suc h informatio n i s t o b e use d a s i s reasonabl ycon venient .P.1 7

(3 ) Al l partie s agre e no t t o divulg e informatio n share d b y other s i n confidence . (4 ) Informatio n an d dat a provide d t o th e Committe e i n writin g i s a matte r o f a publi c record . (5 ) Nothin g containe d i n thes e protocol s shal l restric t EPA' s authorit ypursuan t t o § 11 4 o f th e Clea n Ai r Act . e . Rulemakin g Record . (1 ) Minute s o f meeting s an d an yothe r document s prepare d o r circulate d i n conjunctio n wit h th e Negotiatio n shal l b e place d i n a publi c docke t o f th e negotiations , bu t shal l no t b e place d i n an yEPA rulemakin g docke t o r considere d b yEPAa s a basi s fo r rulemaking , excep t — (a ) EPAmaysubmi t a lis t o f document s i t propose s t o includ e i n a rulemakin g docke t an d wil l includ e onl ysuc h document s a s t o whic h n o Committe e Membe r object s t o including , o r (b ) factua l material , data , o r aggregation s o f dat a prepare d i n conjunctio n wit h th e negotiation s o r relevan t t o th e subjec t o f th e negotiation s an d i t i s no t confidential . (2 ) Thi s provisio n doe s no t preven t an ypart yt o thes e negotiation s from

submittin g t o an yEP Arulemakin g docke t an

ydocumen t tha t suc h part yprepare d o r other
wis e generate d fo r us e i n thi s negotiation . Bu t n o part yma ymak e suc h us e o f an ydocumen t prepare d o r generate d b

yan yothe r part yfo r us e i n thi s negotia
tion . 7 . SCHEDUL E Negotiatin g session s wil l initiall yb e hel d onc e eac h month . Th e firs t negotiatin g sessio n wil l b e hel d Septembe r 27-28 , 1989 . Unles s extende d b yth e Committee , th e deadlin e fo r th e negotiation s i s Apri l 30 , 1990 .RJJ L



# _T_.C_KM T ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENC Y NEGOTIATIN

G COiXKHTTE E CONTRO L O F FUGITIVE EKHSSION S O F VOC s FROM _QUIPD_EN T LEAK S ATTENDANC E LIS T FOR MEETIN G O F SEPTEMBE R 27 , 198 9
Bo b Aja x 919/541-557 9 U.S . EP A MD-1 3 FA X 919/541-566 1 Researc h Triangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Ro n Berglun

d 304/747-498 5 Unio n Carbid e BOX 8361 , 770-32 0 So . Charleston , w

v2530 3 Alfre d w . Bicku

m216/796=153 4 1 1 SR P 114 4 E . Marke t Stree t Akron , O H 4431 6 FA X 216/796-645 9 Gustav e Vo n Bodunge n 504/342=904 7 Louisian a Departmen t o f Environmenta l Qualit y P . O . Bo x 4409 6 Bato n Rouge , LA7080 4 FA X 504/342=904 8 Bruc e v . Bower s 302/834=453 6 Standar d Chlorin e o f Delawar e Governo r WayRoa d Delawar e City , D E 1970 6 Ric k Colye r 919/541=526 2 U S EPA SD B (MD=13 ) FA X 919/541=566 1 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 Nanc yCookso n 202/887=124 1 Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n 250 1 M Street , N.W . Washington , D . C . 2003 7 Lind a Curra n 312/420=488 9 Amoc o Oi l Compan

y Warrenvill ©Roa d _ Mil l St .P.1 9

Naperville , I L 6054 0 FA X 312=420=369 8 Davi d Dunn Sterlin g Chemicals , Inc . P . 0 . Bo x 131 1 Texa s City , TX - 7759 2 409/942=312 9

Thoma s A . Fe e Nationa l Institut e fo r Disput e Resolutio n 190 1 L Street , N . W . Washington , D . C . 2003 6 202/466=476 4

Kare n Fidle r 202/887-129 0 Chemica l Manufacturer s Associatio n 250 1 M street , N.w . Washington , D . C . 2003 7 Nicola s Garci a Offic e o f Managemen t an d Budge t 72 5 17t h Street , N.W . NEO B Room

301 9 Washington , D . C . 2050 3 202/395=308 4

MaryAn n Gork o DuPon t P . O . Bo x 609 0 Newark , D E 1971 4 302/366=301 1

Alle n Hershkovit z 212/727=446 5 Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l 4 0 Wes t 2 0 Stree t Ne wYork , NY 1002 5 FA X 212/727=177 3 J . L . Hes s DuPon t Coapan

y P . 0 . Bo x 609 0 Newark , D E 1971 4 302/366=357 5 FA X 302/366=225 1 C . W . How e Chevro n 170 0 K Stree t Washington , D . C . 2000 6 202/457=580 0Jac k Kac e

Hoffmann L a Roch e 34 0 Kingsland Stree t Nutley , N

J 0711 0 201/235-377 4

Katherin e Kaufma n 202/475=895 0 EPA , Offic e o f Ai r _Radiatio n ANR-44 3 40 1 M Street , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2046 0 FA X 202/475=976 6 Chri s Kirt z U S EPA PM-22 3 40 1 M Street , S W Washington , D . c . 2046 0 202/382=756 5

Rober t v . Majewsk i NY S DE C 5 0 Wol f Roa d Albany , N

Y 12233=325 5 518/457=768 8

Davi d Markword t 919/541=083 7 Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y MD-1 3 FA X 919/541=566 3 Researc h Triangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Alin e McKenzi e Scienc e New s 171 9 NStreet , M.W . Washington , D . C . 2003 6 202/785=225 5

Le e E . Mille r Departmen t o f Interio r 18t h 6 C Streets , M.W . Washington , D . C . 2024 0 202/343=229 3

Le s Montgo_<ar

y512/451=571 1 Texa s Ai r Contro l Boar d 633 0 Highway29 0 E Austin , T X 7872 7 FA X 512/451=571 1 Lui s M . Mid o Bracewel l _Patterso n 200 0 K Street , N.W . Washington , D . C . 202/828=582 6 FA X 202/223=122 5 3Rober t Pahel-Shor t 919/541-531 0

EPA , OAR , OAQPS , ESD , SD B MD-1 3 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 Frank J . Phoeni x 919/493-247 1 C- E Environmenta l 6320 . Quaarangl e Driv e Chape l Hill , N C 2751 4 John Proko p 202/659=230 1 ILT A 113 3 15t h Street , N.W . Washington , D . C . 2000 5 FA X 466=416 6 Glenn D . Rive s 919/541=910 0 Radia n Corporation/RT P P . O . Bo x 1300 0 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 Rober t E . Rosenstee l 919/541=560 8 EP A MD-1 3 Researc h Triangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Fran k T . Rya n 202/682=925 0 Goodyea r 90 1 15t h Street , N.W . Washington , D . C . FA X 202/682=153 7 Elle n Siegle r 202/682=827 1 America n Petroleu

mInstitut e 122 0 L Street , N.W . Washington , D . C . 2001 5 Bo b Strie£®

_202/682=833 7 America n Petroleu

mInstitut e 122 0 L Street , N.W . Washington , D . C . 2000 5 Scot t Throw e 202/382=281 1 EPA/SSC D EN=34 1 40 1 M Street , S.W . Washington , D . C . 2046 0P.2 2

Rober t VanVoorhee s 202/289=610 0 Bryan , Cave , McPheeter s 6 McRobert s 101 5 Fifteent h Street , N W Washington , D.C . 2000 5 FAX 202/789=545 4 W . H . Wals h 302/366=304 5 DuPon t Compan

y 138 5 Louvier s Bldg/Engineerin g Dept . Newark , D E 19714=609 0 FAX 302/366=659 5P.2 3

i » 

# ATTACHMEN T3 SE P 5 

# » Equipmen t Lea k

Regulator

y Negotiatio n

1 . Significance o

f Equipmen t Leak

s 2 . Negotiatio n Scope

- Emissio n Factors ; estimatin g techniques

- Standard s reflectin g MAC T

- Forma t fo r Risk-base d Standard sP.2 4



# SIGNIFICANC E O F EQUIPMEN TLEA K EMISSION S
1 . SAR A 31 3 Data : Ai r fugitiv

e emission s reported - 390,00 0 tp y Ai r poin t sourc

e emission s reporte d - 840,00 0 tp y


# 2 . Relativ

e groun d leve l impac

t o ffugitiv e vs . stac k emission s

- fugitiv e emissio n impac

t i s abou t 1 0 to 4 0 time s greate r tha n impac t resultin g fro m equa l release s o

fstac k emissions .

# SIGNIFICANC E O F EQUIPMEN TLEA K

EMISSIO N
3 . Th e nee

d fo r quantificatio n

- Communit

yright-to-kno wresponsibilitie s

- Litigatio n exposure

- Case-bycas e permitting/emissio n fee s

- Wast e minimizatio n initiative s

- Protectio n of healt h 4 . Regulator y Direction s

- Th e Administration' s propose d amendment s t o §11 2 of th e Clea n Ai rAct list s 19 1 chemical s t o b e regulated : (1 ) i n phas e 1 , t o reduc e emission s t o level s achieveabl e wit h maximu m achieveabl e contro l technolog y(MACT

) and , (2 ) i n phas e 2 , t o eliminat e unreasonabl e risk .

# I Porlodfcal y

AHfn-ttn Compliant* 

# I 

# i

Exemptio n from MAC Tupo n demonstrate ! o l voluntar y 00 % emissio n reductio n 

# t 

# 1 Exemptio n from MACT upo n demonstratio n o l •negtipiMo-risI t 

# J Usto l Hazardou s PoUutant s * * ^ P*«OMI _

Ad i or (MM * 

# I
Publis h Majo r Souro e Categor

y UsUnEB . 

# r Titl e II I

Ai r Toxic s EP A rankin g cr

t uouroa categoris e Regulator

y Agend a (1 0 M M c—tpoi'm

wM n ^~ 2 MM , 2S % tnUii n 4 M«tt . xM_ion- l 2S % wthi n /

Mtri . •n d dacition - o n « l mrnwan f

mU-nlOj-Mtf. ) 

## A

# i _v«*_u»iMM>_ r

<M*MMfe7jMf * Maximu m Achievabl e Contro l Technology (MACT) 

# I

5 yea r exlunsio n lor prio r complianc

e b y in_U___o n o l RACT . BAtT . o r IAE H 

# I Promulgat e standard s to protec

t adoquahrt

y agans l "unreasonabl e risk * considerin g cost , technical toasibity. an d healfrUse d risk s
State s Issu e Operatin g Permit

s

## TH E EMISSIO N FACTO R /

ESTIMATIN G TECHNIQU E ISSU E

1 . Direc t measuremen t of equipmen t leak s i s impractica l 2 . Indirec t measuremen t method s ar e availabl e

- Accurac

yi s relate d t o complexity .

- Th e simples t approache s have poo raccuracy .

- Th e more accurat e availabl e approache s are costly .

- Availabl e method s are leas t accurat e at th e bes t controlle d plants . 3 . Neede d improvement s

- Bette rcorrelation s fo rlowlea k rat e facilitie s

- Mor e accurat e emissio n factors base d o n th e simples t possibl e screenin g techniques .

- Emissio n factors tha t ca n b e use d t o relat e complianc e tes t result s t o emissions .

# Emissio n F <

© 

### o

_ _ 3 O (_
_ 

### c o S O m m < _ _ i_ )



### Lea k Frequenc

y ( % of valve s wit h screenin g value s abov e 10,00 0 ppm )

pcgo O

o o

# AS S EMISSIO N FACTO R V S SCREENIN G VALU E Ga s Valve s

©

_ 3 O O S

C O c g

_ E

_ y e o so tf l

— j r1 -~ T1 1 o 1 o

10,00 0 20.00 0 30.00 0 40,00 0 50.00 0 60,00 0 70,00 0 80,00 0 90,00 0 100,00 0

Screenin g Valu e (ppmv) fo reac h valv e

peg- 'P.3 0



### C O 

# c c 

# o o < 

### L L 

# c o L U "C B 

## l_L > 

# o s § O C O 

### D C < 

# a . O 

# o O



### o - " \ *> V . ' > V '.-* • o » - »r» _ 

# 4_^_^ssrs_8_aa i « § « ^fc_ i

<£> O 

### o © 

### m o o 

# s o C O 

### o o d CV J 

### o o 

### d *^ $ ' _ > \* _ • W

. * . _" " £_•! _

< , - - s_ V 

### ;^v_' ?v8 #



### o o • % , v

# o. ' _ -

• _ 

# v _

_ > 

### <? - 

# V V

_ - 

# V
< _ .

. _ .

# V
<b u ^ 

# V °_>

• 

### (eojnos/jq/6^ ) jope j uoi.ssjw gP.3 1



# Developmen t o

fStandard s tha

t reflec t MAC T
1 . Th e principl e regulator y approac h i s lea k detectio n an d repai r (LDAR) .

- LDAR i s a wor k

practice/maintenance standard .

- LDA R i s assume d t o achiev e a n estimate d percentag e reductio n i n baselin e emissions . EQUIPMEN T COMPONEN T Pum p Seal s Packe d an d Mechanica l Valve s Ga s Liqui d Flange s CONTRO L EFF . (percent) 60. 8 73. 0 _ 59. 0 0. 0P.3 2



# SUMMARYO F CURREN TLDAR STANDARD S

(SOCM I NSPS

)

•PUMP S I N L L SERVIC E AN D VALVE S I N GAS/L L SERVIC E •Monthl y lea k

detectio n an d repai r

- Lea k = 10,00 0 pp m o r greate r

- Repai r withi n 1 5 days , firs t attempt withi n 5 days •O r "leakless " equipmen t

- N o detectabl e emission s = les s tha n 50 0 pp m

- Annua l monitorin g •ALTERNATIV E STANDARD S FO R VALVE S •2 percen t leakers (performanc e standard no t t o b e exceeded ) •Ski p perio d LDA R (wor k practice standard )
•PUMP S AN D VALVE S I N H L SERVIC E / PRESSUR E RELIE F DEVICE S I N L L O R H L SERVIC E / FLANGE S AN D OTHE R CONNECTOR S •Monito r fo r lea k

i fevidenc e o

flea k i s foun d •Lea k = 10,00 0 pp m o r greate r •Repai r withi n 1 5 days , firs t attempt withi n 5 day s •COMPRESSOR S /

SAMPLIN G CONNECTIO N SYSTEM S / OPEN-ENDE D LINE S
•N o detectabl e emission s an d specifie d equipmen t •CLOSE D VEN TSYSTEM S - n o detectabl e emission s •CONTRO L DEVICE S - 9 5 percen t reductio n L L = Light liqui d H L = Heav y liqui dP.3 3



# Developmen t o

fStandard s tha

t reflec t MAC T
2 . Th e actua l contro l approaches an d emission s a

t many facilitie s ar

e probabl y muc h differen t tha n th e abov e assumptions .

- Bes t controlled plants emi t les s tha n estimate s fo r typica l plants wit h LDA R alone .

- Bes t contro l likel y consist

s o fcombination s o

forigina l plant design , componen t desig n an d materials , operatin g an d maintenance practices , lea k detectio n programs , etc .

- Curren t regulator

y approaches AQ

ng-t ; provid e inrantivfl s o r credi t fo r th e type s o

f program s thatachiev e best control .

- Regulator

y approache s are no

t availabl e mat woul d assur e achievemen t o

fquantifiable , lo

wemissio n rates . 

# 3 . Need - A regulator

y approac h tha

t wil l reduc

e emission s t o level s achieveabl e wit h th e bes t contro l technology .

# ESTIMATE S O F CONTRO L EFFECTIVENES S

FO R GAS VALVE S I N BENZEN E SERVIC E

3 O C O

_ o c o c o 'c o c o 

### "E U J 

### 0.0 2 -

0.0 1 -

0.001 5 0.0002 7 "" l " 

### CM A 

### 0.00030 6

.,.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„„,„,, ••iimi!lijjimmiiiMMiiii |



## '-Z__W-__l__ 0.005 6 0.0072 0.026 8

*** _-*_'. - * ' ' > . _ ! ''ki7

H/

' _ ^ \'*' , 'iS'*

% ' ..V_

_J'_J .

. ' •&.< •7s.*' 

### Sterlin g A

vSOCM I Controlle d A vSOCM I Uncontr Av

g Refiner y Controlle d Av g Refiner y Uncontr

<*-»•• -P.3 5



# Developmen t o

fStandard s tha

t reflec t MAC T
4 . Possibl e solution s

- Mor e effectiv

e LDAR , possibly usin g a lowe r lea k definitio n

- Limit s o n th e percen t leakin g components ; o r o n th e emission s pe r componen t

- Limit s o n emissions ; o r o n th e numbe r o fleakin g components pe r facilit

y

- A combinatio n o

fth e above , (e.g. , use o fLDA R initiall y wit h a slidin g scal e emissio n limi t to be me t a t som e futur

e time)

# EXAMPL E O F ACOMBINE D "CAP " & TECHNOLOGYLIMI T

c o <- _ c & c o 

### E ® T O O © O © „ _o & - Q

_ j o

_ . * * 

### o - g © - S JO 

### £ 3

_ _ 11 2 D U - H O -



# 1 2 D - 0 - • ] 1 j 1 or



### 50 0 

## (1.0% )

T o 1 1— r .—i— o 1 i— l 200 0 Numbei rof Component s i n Plan t

pe-g o 1 4

# Format fo r Risk-base d Standard s

- Thi s issu e pertain s t o th e forma

t o fa standard fo r equipmen t leak

s tha t woul d assur

e th e additiona l emissio n reductio n to protec

t publi c healt h fro m unreasonabl e risk.

- Thi s issu e arise s becaus e curren t approache s base d o n technolog y produce differin g results dependin g upo n suc h factor s a s numbe r o

fcomponents .

- Th e goa l i s a regulator y forma t tha t coul d be used b

y EP A to "cap " emissions . (Th e leve l o r stringenc y is no t t o be considere d i n thi s negotiation. )

- Option s are

- A ca p o n th e numbe r o fleakin g components

- A ca p o n th e tota l emission s

i 1 5co l co l 

## Relationshi p betwee n Negotiatio n Topics

Develo p a standar d reflectin g MAC Ti n a format tha t allow s accurat e quantificatio n

(a )

MAC Tstandar d 

# I Emission s Develo p Accurat e Emissio n Factor s tha t ca n b e use d wit h limite d samplin g dat a Develo p a regulator y forma t tha t ca n b e applie d t o achiev e ris k goal s

Format fo r Performanc e Ca p

Emission s Ca p

(a ) IfMAC Ti s expresse d i n term s ofemissions , the n developmen t ofemissio n factor s may b e critica l pat h-__ .

__*»__ _ 

### Calculat e emissio n factor s (curves ) usin g lea k

frequenc ydistribution sDevelo p MAC TStandar d 

# Consideration s i n th e Developmen t o f a n MACTStandar d
Performanc e Dat a

- Phosgene , EO , B D

- 2 4 uni t stud y

- othe r dat a Factor s effectin g performanc e
•Equipmen t •O&M , Inspectio n •Fixe d monitor s

- Training , othe r

Feasibility , Cost s Schedule/learnin g curv e Ne wv s Existin g Source s Interest s
•Predictabl e emissio n result s •Reflec t MAC T

- Enforceabl e

- Regulator

y consistenc y (e.g . Stat e permitting , SAR A reporting )

- Incentive s fo r bette r desig n

- Flexibilit

y

- Minimiz e administrative burden s •Predictabl e complianc e

- Timin g consistan t wit h technology/learnin g curve Industr y Profil e

Possibl e MAC TOption s

- Forma t

- Stringenc y

- Averagin g tim e

- Complianc e schedul e

- Interi m requirement s

- Complianc e sampling ; statistica l approac h •Reportin g requirement s

- Exemptions/differen t stds . = ne wv s existin g = dilut e stream s = lowthroughpu t

- uniqu e processe s _ _ _ Baselin e condition s
Nationa l Impact s

Standard s Combin e wit h Process , Storage . Wastewate r Stds . fo r HO N categorie s®

3 O w 0.00 2 —
0.00. 5 — O «- » o y _ 

## c o '5 ® yy o.oo . —

0.000 5 —

o 

# :©[nn]pa_DS©[n

i ®f f Erasst o F u_t e ia s Valve s 

# 4 0.005 6 -av g SOCM I

LDA R

e_fs* to o - ~ ©

> W ) B A O •_._•_-_.'_ . _=_=.__ _ __.__.._ ___.__ . £_ . J C J C

__ , _2 _ _= T C

_ _ = £_ . __X J

_ « — A _.••_•__.

__.__.__.« •

_ c £_ . ^• ^ (Qft (Q > (Q/J.

__ L __ L -o —•

# Compariso n o fEmissio n Factors Light Liqui d Valve s 0.003 -

^ 0.002 5 C D O

NN(OW©N , *NO--T-»f-n--NW^*S(OCOO)eOO , *(pNNO»-OlONO » * 0.007 1 - avg SOCM I LDAR

6 J C 0.0.0.0.0.0.x : a. _z a. S o . o .P.4 3 

### Emissio n Factor s (kg/hr/source) o © c n 

# O



# o 3 S D 

# 55 ' o 3

- o c 

# 3 OT 

# m 3 5> ' </ > 

# o 3 • n 0 ) 

# o Ui 

# f•
3 D 

### 2

( O w O 

### o

# Compariso n o fEmissio n Factors Flange s

0.00 1 — C D _>

. 3 

## o t o O ) Ui

__ . O •- » 

### o C O • § 0.0005 c o 

### * E L U avg SOCM I

^<p<D^cpoinr^<D-^cn.cM<pcMcocMr^T-CMKCAcocAOC^ocou)cocMin^^v- ^ 8 _ » S aa x aaaaaiaarSSS'O'aSS-SSi-iiSooiSSi] ) a. a. xz aa a aa rCL CL xz a . a. a.P.4 5



# ..TT/_(__M_M T 4

Septembe r 27 , 198 9 ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO NAGENC Y

. . NEGOTIATIN G COMMITTE E FO R CONTRO L O F FUGITIV E EMISSION S O F VOC s FRO M EQUIPMEN T LEAK S COMMITTE E MEMBER S Ch@_ical s Bruc e V . Bower s Standar d Chlorin e P.O . Bo x 31 9 Delawar e City , D E 1970 6 FA X Davi d Dun n Sterlin g Chemica l Corp . P.O . Bo x 131 1 Texa s City , T X 7759 2 FAX : Thoma s A . Kittlema n E.I . DuPon t d e Nemour s & Co , Engineerin g Departmen t Louvier s Buildin g Newark , D E 19714 FAX . 302=834-453 6

409-942=312 9

302-366-471 8

E n v i r o___e__t

a 1 Davi d Donige r Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l Suit e 30 0 135 0 Ne wYor k Avenu e N W Washington , D C 20005 FAX s Alle n Hershkowit z Natura l Resource s Defens e Fun d 4 0 w . 20t h Stree t Ne wYork , Net . Yor k 1001 1 FAX S 212-727-177 3 202-783-780 0

212-727-446 5

EP A Rober t Aja x MD-1 3 Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 919=541-557 9P.4 6

FAX s 919-541=566 1 Debora h Dalto n 202=382=549 5 PM-22 3 Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y 40 1 M Stree t S W Washington , D C 2046 0 FAX : 202-382-788 3 Facilitato r Phili p J . Harte r 202=887=103 3 Suit e 40 4 230 1 M Stree t N

W Washington , D C 2003 7 FAX S 202-887-103 6 

### oi l Lind a Curra n 312=420-488 9 Amoc o Oi l Compan

y Warrenvill e Roa d 6 Mil l Stree t Naperville , I L 6054 0 FAX s 312-420=369 8 Pharmaceutical s Jac k Kac e 201=235-377 4 Director , Environmenta l Affair s Hoffmann-LaRoche , Inc . 34 0 Kingsland Stree t Nutley , NJ 0711 0 FAX S 201-235-760 6 Rubb@ _ Alfre d W . Bicku

m 216=796=153 4 Manager , Valu e Engineerin g Goodyea r FAX s 216=796=645 9 State/loca l gov®_r____®__' t Gu s Vo n Bodunge n 504=342=904 7 Ai r Qualit yDivisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yand Nuclea r Energy Departmen t o f Environmenta l Qualit y P.O . Bo x 9409 6P.4 7

Bato n Rouge , L

A7080 4 FAX S 504-342-904 8 Anupo mGangul i 818=572=218 3 Sout h Coas t Ai r Qualit yManagemen t Distric t 915 0 Flai r Driv e E l Monte , CA FAX : Bo b Majewsk i 518=457-768 8 NYSDE C 5 0 Wol f Roa d Albany , N

Y 12233-325 5 FAX s Le s Montgomer y512=451-571 1 Texa s Ai r Contro l Boar d 633 0 Highway29 0 Eas t Austin , T X 7872 3 FAX s 512-451-571 1 Harvel e Roger s 502=584=815 1 Ai r Pollutio n Contro l Distric t 91 4 Eas t Boardway Louisville , KY 4020 4 FAX sP.4 8



# ATTACHMEN T5

Reserve dfo r Draf t Organizationa l Protocol sP.4 9



# _.T_.__iJ__ T

Draf t Septembe r 18 , 198 9
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENC Y NEGOTIATING COMMITTE E FO R CONTRO L O F FUGITIVE EMISSION S O F VOC s FRO M EQUIPMENT LEAK S

RESOURC E POO L PROTOCOL S l c PURPOS E O F TH E POO L a . T o provid e fund s fo r short-termresearch , technica l analy
sis , an d othe r suppor t fo r th e Committe e a s a whol e an d fo r individua l participatin g interests . b . T o defra yextraordinar yexpense s o f participatio n fo r partie s wh o woul d otherwis e no t b e abl e t o participat e i n th e negotiations . 2 . PROTOCOL S FO R USING TH E POO L a . Group Decisions s Th e group a s a whol e wil l decid e wha t short-termresearch , technica l analysis , an d othe r infor
matio n shoul d b e funde d throug h th e pool . An ypart yma y objec t t o th e nee d fo r suc h research , technica l analysis , informatio n o r support . I n thi s case , th e facilitato r wil l determin e whethe r ther e i s sufficien t group consensu s tha t th e wor k shoul d nonetheles s b e undertaken . b . Contracto r Management s Contractor s fo r researc h wil l b e selecte d b

ya representativ e workin g group wit h th e ap prova l o f th e Negotiatin g Committe e a s a whole . Th e re sourc e poo l workin g group shal l b e responsibl e for s (1 ) identifyin g potentia l contractors , wit h a preferenc e fo r competitiv e bid s takin g int o accoun t th e size , complexity , and tim e require d fo r deliver yo f an ysuc h contract ; (2 ) explainin g th e reason s fo r selectin g a particula r contractor ; (3 ) preparin g relevan t wor k order s describin g th e specifi c wor k produc t o f th e contracto r an d th e schedul e fo r it s delivery ; (4 ) ensurin g th e satisfactor yperformanc e o f work ; andP.5 0

(5 ) recommendin g tha t th e Advisor yCommittee' s Executiv e Secretar yauthoriz e disbursement . c . Reques t from

Individua l Parties : Th e Committe e may , t o th e exten t th e lawallows , provid e a part ywit h fund s from th e resourc e poo l fo r trave l and pe r diem , retainin g ex per t consultants , o r conductin g short-termresearc h tha t wil l enabl e tha t part yt o bette r expres s it s need s an d positio n an

d t o judg e th e informatio n provide d b yothe r parties . (1 ) Apart yrequestin g suc h fund s shal l mak e a showin g t o th e Committe e o f reason s fo r need . (2 ) Th e recipien t o f suc h fund s shal l provid e a n account ing fo r thei r us e t o Committee . 3 . MANAGEMEN T O F TH E POO L Th e Resourc e Poo l wil l b e manage d b yth e Nationa l Institut e fo r Disput e Resolution . Th e Advisor yCommittee' s Executiv e Secretar ywil l transmi t request s t o pa yfo r service s tha t ar e authorize d byth e Committee . Th e Institut e wil l dis
tribut e appropriat e fund s i n respons e t o suc h requests . Th e Institut e wil l no t b e responsibl e fo r th e qualit yo f wor k receive d o r th e vendo r selected .P.5 1



# ATFA©HSWii_

T7 Fugitiv e Emissiomi s Regulator yNegotiation . Worksho p



### Presente dby Jonatha nB . Marks ENDISPUTE

, Incorporate d Septembe r 27 , 198 9 12:45
- 1p.m .
1 p.m . - 5:3 0 p.m . 1:00
- 1:5 0 p.m . 1:5 0 p.m . - 2:4 0 p.m . 2:4 0 p.m . - 3:3 0 p. m

Thinkin g About

Negotiatin g aPropose dRul e - - Wha t Ca nW e Lear n fromNegotiatio nTheor y andPas t Regulator y Negotiations ? Puttin g Theor

y andExperienc e Into Practic e — Thre e Exercise s andDebriefings . Wi nas Muc has Yo u Ca n ° Exercis e ° Debriefing .

3:3 0 - 4:3 0 p.m . 4:3 0 - 5:3 0 p.m . Coalitio nGam e ° Thre e Part

y Negotiatio n Exercis e ° Debriefing Dirtystuf f Simulatio n Preparatio n ° Rea dDirtystuf f Regulator y Negotiatio n Exercis e • Meeting s o

f Thos e Playin g Rol e o

f Eac hPart y in Negotiatio n Negotiatio nExercis e —The Dirtystuf f Rule . Dirtystuf f Debriefing Pullin g Togethe r

th e Lesson s o f

th e WorkshopP.5 2 _%\_cu r 

# ATTACHMEN T8 Equipmen t Lea k

Regulator

y Negotiatio n
Propose d Refinement s T o EP A Procedure s Fo r Estimatin g Equipmen t Lea k Emission s

EP A Presentatio n b y Mr . Davi d Markword t Emissio n Standar d Divisio n U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1

Septembe r 28 , 198 9P.5 3



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

Overvie wo

fEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s Metho d T o Achieve Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra mP.5 4



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

Overvie wo

f EP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s Metho d T o Achieve Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra mP.5 5



# OVERVIE WO F EP

A EMISSION S ESTIMATIO N PROCEDURES EP A Protoco l Present s 5 Methodologie s Fo r Estimatin g Equipmen t Lea k Emission s

• Averag e Emissio n Factor s Leak/No-Lea k

Emissio n Factor

s Stratifie d Emission Factor

s EP ACorrelation s Unit-Specifi cCorrelation sP.5 6



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

Overvie wo

fEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s -Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s Metho d T o Achieve Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra mP.5 7



# CURREN TCONCERN S WIT H PROCEDURES

- Questionabl e Accuracy O f Availabl e Estimatio n Procedures , Especiall y A t Well-Controlle d Plants

- Man y Plant s Force d T o Ba g T o Achieve Realisti c Emission s Estimate sP.58

•3

___ _=_

_ _ 

# m

C =

___ 

# <m <m • _ • « . © 

### kr « <S_3 ) ; _

<C=



### i r I W

© r w i 6
© ©
_ © © <3 ? 6 . W ( S 3 

### 1
© ® O

(%5 > §

_©gsegtuyj u §8©(^ ) #

® ®©gp©@jo^ jP.5 9



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

Overvie wo

fEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s Metho d T o Achieve Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra mP.6 0



# NEEDE D IMPROVEMENT S T O PROCEDURE S Large r Databas e of Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a

• Additiona l Data At Lo wScreenin g Value s
• Additiona l Data Collecte d Wit h Adequat e QA/Q C

- Bette r Correlation s Reduces Nee d Fo rPlants To Ba gP.6 1



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

- Overvie wofEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s

- Metho d T o Achiev e Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipment . Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra m

• Purpos e • Propose d Strateg y • Highlight

s O f Propose d QA/Q C Dat a Collectio n Progra m • Overvie wO f Existin g Screeenin g An d Baggin g Data • Propose d Samplin g Matri x • Practica l Issue s Relate d t o Dat a Collectio nP.6 2



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

- Overvie wofEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s

- Metho d T o Achiev e Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra m

• Purpos e • Propose d Strateg y • Highlight

s O f Propose d QA/Q C Dat a Collectio n Progra m • Overvie wO f Existin g Screeenin g An d Baggin g Data • Propose d Samplin g Matri x • Practica l Issue s Relate d t o Dat a Collectio nP.6 3



# PROPOSE D QA/Q C EQUIPMEN TSCREENIN G AN D BAGGIN G DAT A COLLECTIO N PROGRA M

- Purpos e Improv e Methodolog yAn d Tool s Fo rQuantifyin g Equipmen t Lea k Emissions , Especiall yI n Th e Lo w Screenin g Valu e Rang eP.6 4



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

- Overvie wo fEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s

- Method T o Achiev e Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra m

• Purpos e • Propose d Strateg y • Highlights O f Propose d QA/Q C Dat a Collectio n Progra m • Overvie wO f Existin g Screeenin g An d Baggin g Data • Propose d Samplin g Matri x • Practica l Issue s Relate d t o Dat a Collectio nP.6 5



# PROPOSED QA/Q C EQUIPMEN T SCREENIN

G AND BAGGIN

GDAT A COLLECTIO

N PROGRA M

- Propose d Strateg y

• Develo p QA/Q C Guidelines Fo rFiel d Screenin g An d Baggin g
• Collec t Equipmen

t Screenin g An d Baggin g Data

- Ligh t Liqui d Valve s

- Ga s Valve s

- Pump s

- Ligh t Liqui d Flange s

- Ga s Flange s
• Develo p NewCorrelation sP.6 6



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

- Overvie wo f EP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s

- Metho d T o Achiev e Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra m

• Purpos e • Propose d Strateg y • Highlights O f Propose d QA/Q C Dat a Collectio n Progra m • Overvie wO f Existin g Screeenin g An d Baggin g Dat a • Propose d Samplin g Matri x • Practica l Issue s Relate d t o Data Collectio nP.6 7



# HIGHLIGHT S O F PROPOSE D QA/Q C DAT A COLLECTIO N PROGRA M

- QA/Q C Guideline s Fo r Screenin g

• Use O f On e Mode l O f Screenin g Instrumen t At Al l Participatin g Facilitie s (Foxbor o OV A Has Bee n Selecte d Fo rThi s Propose d Program )
• Us e O f Tw o Screenin g Instruments Pe rFacility

- On e instrumen t Dedicate d T o Lo wScreenin g Valu e Rang e

- On e instrumen t Dedicate d T o Mid - An d Uppe r En d O f Screenin g Valu e Rang e
• Us e O f ADilutio n Prob e Fo rEquipment Screenin g > 10,00 0 ppmv
• Develo p Separat e Respons e Curve s Fo rEac h Screenin g Instrumen t
• Minimu m Two-Poin t Calibratio n O f OV A

• Independent Observe rT o Ensur e Compliance Wit h QA/Q C Procedure sP.6 8



# HIGHLIGHT S O F PROPOSE D QA/Q C DAT A COLLECTIO N PROGRA M

- QA/Q C Guideline s Fo r Baggin g

• Us e O f ALaborator

yAnalytica l Instrumen t To Analyz e Ba g Samples

• Minimu m Two-Poin t Calibratio n O f Laborator y Analytica l Instrumen t

• AccuracyCheck

s

• Blin d Standard s

• Blow-Throug h Baggin g Techniqu eP.6 9



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

- Overvie wofEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s

- Metho d T o Achiev e Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra m

• Purpos e • Propose d Strateg y • Highlight

s O f Propose d QA/Q C Dat a Collectio n Progra m • Overvie wO f Existin g Screeenin g An d Baggin g Data • Propose d Samplin g Matri x • Practica l Issue s Relate d t o Dat a Collectio nP.7 0



# PROPOSED QA/Q C EQUIPMEN T SCREENIN

G AND BAGGIN

GDAT A COLLECTIO

N PROGRA M Availabl e Screenin g An d Baggin g Dat a Fro m Refinery Assessmen t Stud y • Summar

yOf Data Collecte d r



# - Purpos e Wa s T o Evaluate Emission s Ove rEntir

e Rang e O f Screenin g Value s

- Lo wEn d O f Screenin g Valu e Rang e Determine d To Have Smal l Effect O n Tota l Emissions ; Therefore , Data Collectio n At Mid - An d Uppe rRang e O f Screenin g Value s Wa s Emphasize d

- Flang e Baggin g Dat a Use d T o Develo p EP ACorrelatio n Fo rFlange s

• Compariso n O f QA/Q C Procedure s To Propose d QA/Q C Guidelines

### Equipmen t

Typ e

Valve s Valve s Valve s Valve s 0 . E . Line s i Pum pSeal s Pum pSeal s Compressor s Compressor s Flange s Drain s Relie f Valve s SCREENIN GDATA FRO M EP A REFINER YASSESSMEN T Servic e

Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Hydroge n Al l Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Hydrocarbo n Hydroge n Al l Al l Gas/Vapo r Numbe r

of . Plant s

1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 Tota l 0-20 0

pp m 41 1 59 6 45 6 7 7 10 0 17 4 22 9 3 0 1 6 1,97 3 21 1 9 4 4,36 7 STUD Y
Numbe r o f Screene d 200-I K pp m 3 3 7 0 2 1 8 7 7 9 2 4 1 1 8 2 9 1 8 1 1 31 9 1K-10 K

pp m 4 7 14 2 7 2 2 1 2 10 4 2 8 1 3 1 7 1 7 1 4 2 3 44 6 Source s

>10 K pp m 7 1 10 4 1 2 8 1 0 11 3 1 1 7 2 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 47 8 Tota l

56 2 91 2 48 5 13 5 12 9 47 0 29 2 12 6 7 4 2,03 0 25 5 14 0

## BAGGINGDAT A FRO M EP A REFINERYASSESSMEN T STUD Y Equipmen t Typ e

Valve s Valve s Valve s Valve s Open-ende dLine s Pum pSeal s Pum pSeal s Compressor s Compressor s Flange s Drain s Relie f Valve s Servic e

Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Hydrogen Al l Light Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Hydrocarbon Hydrogen Al l Al l Gas/Vapo r Numbe r

o f Plant s

1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 Tota l 0-20 0

pp m 6 1 7 4 2 1 7 4 0 3 6 5 1 1 6 6 Numbe r o f Bagge d 200-1 K pp m 3 1 6 8 2 0 7 7 7 5 2 3 7 8 2 9 1 8 1 1 30 4 1K-10 K

pp m 4 6 14 1 7 2 2 1 2 10 4 2 8 1 0 1 7 1 7 1 4 2 3 44 1 Source s

>10 K pp m 7 1 10 4 1 2 8 1 0 11 0 1 1 7 2 3 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 47 3 Tota l

15 4 33 0 3 2 5 9 3 0 29 6 6 6 8 9 6 0 6 2 4 9 5 7

• _P.7 3

_= _

__ >

_ »


# m 

# I
( ^ _ >

__ ) © • © © o a g _ ( 3 ©

_ -

__ >

h _ y

w i ©
© © © f* = _ © w (%) @y@g@@gim_

i @@@| ^ ^© ©@®p©@_jo^ |P.7 4

CC_>AB!_C a O P QA/Q C PR0CEDU8E S FHO S EH I STIM GSTUDIE S T O PROPOSE DQA/Q C GUIDELINE S Screening/Boggin g Study Refinepy Assessmen t Study SOCH I

24-Uni t Study 6-Uni t

Mointenonc o Study 80/E O

Pon s I Studie s QA/Q C GuidsUrw s fo r Screenin g
Us e o f o nOV

A fppscreenin g Us o o f tw

o OVA' o (On o lo

w rong o on o (aid - t o hig hrongo ) Us o o f o dilutio nprob o 0eve I o pseparat e respons o curv e fopeoc hOV

A Hininoc - two-poin t colibrotio no f OV

A Drif t Cheek s Irtdspondont Observe r QA/Q C Gufdoline s fo r Beggin g
Us o o f laborator y anolytico l instruran t ••• • Minimu s tuo-poin t colibrotio n o f anolytico l instriosont Accurac y Chock s Blin dStcrtdord

o X(Not e 1 ) X(Not e 2 )

X(Not o 4 )

X(Not e 4 )
X(Not e 4 )

Blow-throug hTechniqu e Indeporetesi t Oteopvo r X(Not o 3 ) X(Mot e 4 )

Not o 1 : AnOV

A uo o use dt o obtai nth o initia l screenin g volu o fo r eoc hcomponent . A TL V ua o use dt o obtai nthe screenin g voluo o durin g bogging . Not o 2 : Bot ho nOV

A on do TLV

tsoP O used . Th o opithsoti e moo no f th o tts o pecding o obtoino dfpo_ > the OV A an dthe TLV uo o rocordo do o tho oboopve dscreenin g volu o fo r eoc hcomponont . Not o 3 : Use dfo plarg o looks . Not e 4 : Use db y

scs a plants . Additiona l QA/Q C procedure s tho t uep e popfonfto ddupin g th e 24-Uni t SOCM I Study ondtho 6-Uni t Maintenanc e Study inciudo : o Repoo t screenin g ondreplicot o screenin g dupin g th e 24-Uni t SOCM I Study : and o RGpoo t screenin g en dpepoo t boggin g durin g the 6-Uni t ttointononeo Study .P.7 5



# PROPOSED QA/Q C EQUIPMEN T SCREENIN

G AND BAGGIN

GDATA COLLECTIO

N PROGRA M

- Availabl e Screenin g An d Baggin g Dat a Fro m SOCM I Studie s •Summar

y O fDat a Collecte d

- Purpos e O f Baggin g Stud yWa s To Determin e Effect O f Maintenanc e O n Emissio n Reductio n

- Larg e Numbe rOf Source s Tha t Wer e Screene d At Lo wEn d Of Screenin g Valu e Rang e Wer

e Determine d T o Have Smal l Effect O n Tota l Emission s

- Most Screenin g Data Collecte d At Lo w En d O f Screenin g Valu e Rang e (0-1,00 0 ppmv

)

- Most Baggin g Data Collecte d At Mid - An d Uppe rEn d O f Screenin g Valu e Rang e (5,000-40,00 0 ppmv

)

- EP ACorrelation s Fo rLigh t Liqui d Valves , Ga s Valves , An d Pump

s Develope d Fro m Thes e Baggin g Data
• Compariso n O f QA/Q C Procedure s T o Propose d QA/Q C Guideline s

### SCREENINGDAT A FRON SOCM I 24-UNI T STUDY Equipmen t Typ e
Flange s Flange s Flange s Proces s Drain s Proces s Drain s Proces s Drain s 0 . E . Line s 0 . E . Line s 0 . E . Line s Agitato r Seal s Agitato r Seal s Agitato r Seal s Relie f Valve s Relie f Valve s Relie f Valve s Valve s Valve s Valve s Pump s Pump s Compressor s Servic e

Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Light Liqui d Heav y Liqui d Gas/Vapo r Numbe r

o f Plant s

2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 2 4 Tota l Numbe r o f ScreenedSource s

O I K pp m 1,33 6 2,81 2 60 7 7 7 49 1 2 6 84 5 3,30 9 46 9 5 8 1 7 5 6 6 3 7,94 3 16,32 0 3,60 6 51 4 9 3 2 7 38,63 3 1K-10 K

pp m 4 1 5 0 0 4 1 6 0 2 4 15 3 2 1 0 0 7 1 0 62 3 80 3 1 1 7 6 2 0 1,81 4 >10 K

pp m 6 6 3 5 0 2 2 0 2 5 4 14 1 6 1 0 0 3 2 0 1,10 2 1,17 1 1 5 5 7 2 2 2,68 1 Tota l

1,44 3 2,89 7 60 7 8 3 52 7 2 8 92 3 3,60 3 47 7 7 8 1 8 5 6 9 3 9,66 8 18,29 4 3,63 2 64 7 9 7 2 9

### BAGGINGDAT A FRON SOCN I 6-UNI T MAINTENANC E STUD Y Equipmen t Typ e

Valve s Valve s Pump s Servic e

Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Ligh t Liqui d Numbe r

o f Plant s
6 6 6 Tota l 0-1 K

pp m 5 1 5 2 1 1 11 4 Numbe r o f 1K-10 K pp m 7 2 10 9 1 4 19 5 Bagge dSource s >10 K pp m 18 6 19 9 3 9 42 4 Tota l

30 9 36 0 6 4P.7 8



# m

__.

___ 

# w

_ _ 

# H

___ 

# s m
m

___ 

# m

(% ) _M®gg§gQJ_i] 888fyt y_• © ®@BJU®9J® dP.7 9
• CGMPAA1S0 M O f QA/Q C

QA/Q C Guideline* fo r Screenin g
Us e o f a nOV

A fo r screenin g Us e o f tw

o OVA' s (On e lo

w rang * on e aid - t o highrange ) Ua a o f a dilutio nprob * Develo pseparat e respons e curv e fo r eac hOV

A Minimu s two-poin t calibratio no f OV

A Drif t Check s Independen t Observe r QA/Q C Guideline s fo r Baggin g
Us * o f laborator y analytica l instruaen t Minimu s two-poin t calibratio n o f analytica l inetruaen t Accurac y Check s Blin dStandard s Blow*throug hTechniqu e Independen t Observe r PROCEDURE S FROM EXISTIN GSTUDIE S T O PROPOSE DQA/Q C GUIDELINE S

Screening/Baggin g stud y Refiner y SOCM I 6-Uni t BO/E O Assessmen t 24-Uni t Maintenanc e Pane l Study study

Study

Studie s

X(Not e 1 ) XX(Not e 2 ) x

XX Xx(Not e 4 )

XX XX
X x

X

XX X(Not o 4 )
XX X(Not e 4 )
XX X s X(Not e 3 ) X(Not e 4 )

Not e 1 : A nOV

A wa a uaa dt o obtai nth a initia l screenin g valu a fo r eee hcoejponent . A TL V wa a use dt o obtai nthe screenin g value s durin g bagging . Not * 2 : Bot ha nOV

A an da TL

V wer e used . Th a arithmati c mea no f th a tw o reading s obtaine dfro a the OV A an dth e TL V wa a recorde da s th a observe dscreenin g valu a fo r eac hcomponent . Not e 3 : Use dfo r larg * leaks . Not a 4 : Use dby

so w plants . Additiona l QA/Q C procedure s tha t war e parforma ddurin g th e 24-Uni t SOCM I Study an dth a 6-Uni t Maintenanc e Study include : o Repea t screenin g andreplicat e screenin g durin g th e 24-Uni t SOCM I Study : snd o Repas t screenin g andrepea t baggin g durin g th e 6-Uni t Maintenanc e Study .P.8 0



# PROPOSE D QA/Q C EQUIPMEN T SCREENIN

G AN D BAGGIN

GDAT A COLLECTIO

N PROGRA M -Availabl e Screenin g An d Baggin g Dat a Fro m Butadien e An d Ethylen e Oxid e Pane l Studie s

• Summar

yOf Data Collecte d

- Purpos e Wa s To Provid e Bette r Estimate s O f Ai rEmission s Fo r Butadien e An d Ethylen e Oxid e Industrie s

- Limite d Baggin g Data • Compariso n Of QA/Q C Procedure s To Propose d QA/Q C Guidelines

### SCREENINGDAT A FRON BUTADIEN E AN D ETHYLEN E OXID E PANE L STUDIE S Equipmen t Typ e

Valve Valve Pum p Seal s Flange s Relie f Valve s Sampl e Point s Open-ende d Line s Compressor s Servic e

i 

### Gas/Vapo r Ligh t Liqui d Ligh t Liqui d Al l Gas/Vapo r Al l Al l Al l Numbe r

o f Plant s
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Tota l Numbe r o f Screene d Source s

0-1 K ppm 8.56 1 24,78 7 36 3 11,98 7 52 0 4 1 65 2 2 1 46,93 2 1K-10 K

ppm 30 2 98 2 7 9 10 8 1 0 9 4 8 1 1,53 9 >10 K

ppm 13 8 50 8 3 1 4 1 7 2 1 4 0 74 1 Tota l

9,00 1 26,27 7 47 3 12,13 6 53 7 5 2 71 4 2 2

• _ b o

## BAGGINGDAT A FRON BUTADIENE AND ETHYLEN E OXID E PANE L STUDIE S Equipmen t Typ e Servic e

;



### Gas/Vapo r Light Liqui d Light Liqui d Al l Gas/Vapo r Al l Al l Al l Numbe r

o f Plant s Numbe r o f Bagge dSource s

O I K pp m 1 5 1 5 2 1 7 0 0 2 0 1K-10 K pp m 6 1 6 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 >10 K pp m 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tota l

2 1 3 4 4 3 2 0 0 2 0 

## Valv e Valv e Pum pSeal s Flange s Relie f Valve s Sampl e Point s Open-ende dLine s Compressor s Tota l 5 1 3 9P.8 3

< CCWPAJJISO M 0 * QA/Q C PROCEDURE S FRO M EXISTIN G STUDIE S T O PROPOSS D QA/Q C GUIDELINE S

_

QA/O C Guideline s for Screenin g
Us e o f a nOV

A fo r screenin g Us e o f two OVA' s (On e lo w rang e on e mid - t o hig hrange ) Us e o f s dilutio nprob e Develo pseparat a respons e curv e fo r eac hOV

A Minimu s two-poin t calibratio no f OV

A Drif t Check s Independen t Observe r QA/Q C Guideline s fo r Baggin g
Us e o f laborator y analytica l inetruaen t Minimu s two-poin t calibratio n o f analytica l instruaen t Accurac y Check s Blin dStandard a Blow-throug hTechniqu e Independen t Observe r Screening/Baggin g Stud y Refiner y SOCH I 6-Uni t BO/E O Assessmen t 24-Uni t Maintenanc e Pane l Stud y Study

Study

Studie s

_
x(Not e 1 ) x x(Not e 2 ) x

Xxx x(Not e 4 )

xxx x
Xx

X

xx x(Not e 4 )
XX X(Not e 4 )
XX X
x(Not e 3 ) x(Not e 4 )

Not e 1 : A nOV

A wa a use dt o obtsi nth a initis l screenin g vslu e fo r eac hcomponent . A TL V wa a uaa dt o obtai nth e screenin g value s durin g begging . Not e 2 : Bot ha nOV

A anda TL

V wer e used . Th e srithmeti c mea no f th e two reading s obtaine dfro m th e OV A an dthe TL V wa a recorde da s th e observe dscreenin g vslu e fo r eac hcomponent . Not e 3 : Use dfo r larg e leaks . Not a 4 : Uaa dby

soma plants . Additiona l QA/O C procedure s ths t Study include : o Repee t screenin g an d o Repea t screenin g an d wer e performe ddurin g the 24-Uni t SOCM I Study sndth e 6-Uni t Maintenanc e replicst e screenin g durin g th e 24-Uni t SOCN I Study : an d repea t baggin g durin g th e 6-Uoi t Maintenanc e Study .P.8 4



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

- Overvie wo

fEP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s

- Metho d T o Achieve Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra m
• Purpose • Proposed Strateg y • Highlight

s O f Proposed QA/Q C Dat a Collectio n Progra m • OverviewOf Existin g Screeenin g An d Baggin g Dat

a • Proposed Samplin g Matri x • Practica l Issues Related t o Dat a Collectio nP.8 5



# PROPOSED QA/Q C EQUIPMEN T SCREENIN

G AND BAGGIN

GDAT A COLLECTIO

N PROGRA M Samplin g Matri xFo r Propose d Dat a Collectio n Progra m
• Screenin g Valu e Ranges Develope d Fro m Frequenc

yDistributio n O f Source s Screene d Durin g Th e Butadien e An d Ethylen e Oxid e Studie s • Recommended Numbe rO f Component s T o Be Bagge d Pe rScreenin g Valu e Rang e Were Develope d Statisticall yFro m ADesir e To Maximiz e Sampl e Siz e Whil e Minimizin g Sampl e Erro r
• Matri xEmphasizes Lo wEn d O f Screenin g Valu e Rang e Whil e Simultaneousl yStrivin g Fo rAdequat e Sampl e Size s I n Mid - An d Uppe rRanges O f Screenin g Value sS«PL M miH X FO R PROPOSE

D EP AQA/Q C SCREE M M D BA £ G IW G DAT ACOLLECTIO

N PROGRA

M Servic e Screetmimig Valu e Suggeste d Klyrfne r o f Bagged l Source s 

### 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 8 0 Mi_m_et r o f

Existin g Dat a Point s * 

### 7 1 2 1 3 

### 15 9 20 2 2 2 

### 9 7 10 7 18 6 

### 0 2 7 2 0 3 9 

### 4

_ 

### 0 3 0 2 6 1 1 2 

### 0 Valv e Ligh t Liqui d

v e
ligh t Liqui d
Raimg e Gas/Vapot r
Rang e Ligh t Liqu i 0 1-1 0 10-10 0 100-10,00 0 0 1-1 0 10-10 0 100-10,00 0 >1 C 1- 1

1-1 0 10-10 0 100-10,00 0 1-1 0 10-10 0 100-10,00 0 >10,00 0

* From SOCM

I 6-Uni t Maintenanc e Stud yan d B D an d F O PTM

_I <__._

_ Ref.ner . _, u wer e oo t inche d b eL j 5r_

_

^.nS'^,.
. QVq cguideline s IO DP.8 7



# ORGANIZATIO N O F PRESENTATIO N

- Overvie wo

f EP A Emission s Estimatio n Procedure s

- Curren t Concern s Wit h Procedure s

- Neede d Improvement s T o Procedure s

- Metho d T o Achieve Neede d Improvements : Propose d Equipmen t Screenin g an d Baggin g Dat a Collectio n Progra m
• Purpose • Proposed Strateg y • Highlight

s O f Proposed QA/Q C Dat a Collectio n Progra m • OverviewO

f Existin g Screeenin g An d Baggin g Dat

a • Proposed Samplin g Matri x • Practica l Issues Related t o Dat a Collectio nP.8 8



# PROPOSED QA/Q C EQUIPMEN T SCREENIN

G AND BAGGIN

GDAT A COLLECTIO

N PROGRA M

- Practica l Issue s Relate d T o Dat a Collectio n Nee d To Ensur

e A n Equitabl e Distributio n Of Source s Amon g Th e Teste d Plants Nee d To B e Awar e Tha

t Populatio n O f Pump s i s Small , An d W

e Ma yHave Troubl e Findin g Enoug h Pump

s To Ba g I n 5 Discret e Screenin g Valu e Range s Recommen d Segregatin g Flange s ByServic e (Ligh t Liqui d An d Gas/Vapor )