alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Terry L. Collins, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argon ST, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 11, 2007   /s/ Terry L. Collins Terry L. Collins
826 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVERSELLERS 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

xionorabie u. A. Davis 

State Registrar ..A 

Texas State Board of Iieaith i 

Austin 2, Texas 

“\ 

Deer sir: Oplnlon lot;.-o-&s :. 

Re: Name..ol’ lilegltlmate child 

born lU’%tlllbipth. 

We have your letter w’ff’cillowsr 

“The question freQuentlg erl8er as to the surname 0r en lllegltlmate, 8a 1s shown la a quotation 

from Mr. Bernhagen, RegSstr\ap ofbirths and deaths 

in Beaumont, Texas: ‘?~ * ‘,/ 

.,.. . . ...\ 

“‘A cud vgs born here ln.,Beaumont, the 

birth happening to b,e a st¶Jlblrth. The 

mother of the child vas a vidov, her husband 

having Aled:more than a year ago, The Infirmary, 8t vhlch the birth occurred, llsted-&he birth as 1lIegitlmate but they vere 

,,. bdeoided as to vbat name to give the infant 

’ -- whether thb chlldrs surname should be the 

mother’s maiden surname or her widowed husband’s -name.’ ‘\ I, ‘\ ‘.,, 

‘It ii no8 my intention to argue the ease, but 

the birth record calls, la item 2, for the full 

name of the child; item 8, for the full name of the 

father; and in item 14, the full maiden name of the 

mot her . 

“In the case mentioned by Mr. Bernhagen, slnoe 

the records shov that the father is dead, the child 

1s lllegltlmste end the certificate ~111 be SO vritten. The widow carries the name of her former husbend. According to a previous oplnlon issued by 
827 

Honorable W. A. Davis, page 2 

your department, the ohlld takes the surname of its 

mother, but in such cases as this, to place the 

lather’s surname 8a the surname 03’ the child vould 

violate Paragraph 25, Rule 448, Article 4477, V.T.S. 

ln tb8t the 8urnama of the child, in this caue, 

vould be 8t least soms lnformatlon by vhioh the 

rather right be identlried. 

“Please advise m8 what the 8urnam8 should be 

in ouch 08~88 as that described above." 

Rule 398 of Article 4477, Revised Civil Statutes, provides in pert as follovs: 

“That a stillborn child shall be registered as 

a birth ami also as a death, and separate certiflcates of both the birth and the death ehall be 

filed with the local registrar, la the usual form 

end manner, the oertlficate of birth to COnt8lQ 1Q 

place of the name of the child, the word 'stillbirth’; provided, that a certlrioate of birth and 

a certificate of death shall not be required for a 

child that has not 8dvaQOed to the fifth month of 

uterogestatlon. . . ." 

We think this plain language of the rtatute disposes 

of your question, and that it 1s unnecessary to give the child 

8ny name at all. 

Very truly yours 

ATTORNEX GFJUWAOF TEXAS 

EH: db
<PAGE> 32

                                                                  Exhibit 12


           AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
          Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                             (Unaudited)



                                                        Nine Months Ended
                                                          September 30,
                                                        2004          2003
                                                      (dollars in thousands)

Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $515,028      $428,740
  Interest expense                                     452,079       412,104
  Implicit interest in rents                            13,531        13,444

Total earnings                                        $980,638      $854,288


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $452,079      $412,104
  Implicit interest in rents                            13,531        13,444

Total fixed charges                                   $465,610      $425,548


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        2.11          2.01
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[AK-962-1410-00-P; AA-9299]


Notice for Publication; Alaska Native Claims Selection

    In accordance with Departmental regulation 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice 
is hereby given that a decision to issue conveyance under the 
provisions of Sec. 14(h)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
of December 18, 1971, 43 U.S.C. 1601, 1613(h)(1), will be issued to 
Calista Corporation for approximately 36.8 acres. The lands involved 
are in the vicinity of Nunivak Island, Alaska.

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 2 N., R. 104 W.,
    Sec. 36.

    A notice of the decision will be published once a week, for four 
(4) consecutive weeks, in the Anchorage Daily News. Copies of the 
decision may be obtained by contacting the Alaska State Office of the 
Bureau of Land Management, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, 
Alaska 99513-7599 ((907) 271-5960).
    Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected 
by the decision, an agency of the Federal government or regional 
corporation, shall have until March 31, 1997 to file an appeal. 
However, parties receiving service by certified mail shall have 30 days 
from the date of receipt to file an appeal. Appeals must be filed in 
the Bureau of Land Management at the address identified above, where 
the requirements for filing an appeal may be obtained. Parties who do 
not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR Part 
4, Subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.
Patricia A. Baker,
Land Law Examiner, ANCSA Team, Branch of 962 Adjudication.
[FR Doc. 97-4835 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
#### CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, Appellant, v. Fred G. MARR, Individually, and Fred G. Marr, as natural parent and next friend of Frederick G. Marr, Jr., a minor, and Frederick Frank, Appellees. ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF the PALM BEACHES, INC., Appellant, v. Fred G. MARR, Individually, and Fred G. Marr, as natural parent and next friend of Frederick G. Marr, Jr., a minor, and City of West Palm Beach, etc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 71-850, 71-851.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 20, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 27, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.1






ODYSSEY
PICTURES CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of Odyssey  Pictures 
Corporation  (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period ended
June 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John Foster,  Chief  Executive  Officer and
Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) 
The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) 
The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




A
signed  original of this  written  statement  required by
Section 906 has been provided  to  Odyssey  Pictures 
Corporation  and will be  retained  by  Odyssey
Pictures  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.







October
28, 2009




/s/
John W.
Foster


John W.
Foster


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer
Holland & Knight 

800 171h Street N,W., Suite 1100, Washington DC 20006 1 Washington, DC 20006 1 T 202.955.3000 I F 202 .955.5564 

Holfand & Knight llP I wwwhklaw.com 

Anita M. Mosner 

(202) 419 -2604 

anila.mosner@hklaw.com 

February 5, 2015 

BY ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Mr. Brett Kruger 

Acting Chief, U.S. Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washinglon, D.C. 20590 

Re: Application of United Parcel Service Co. for an amended Certificate of Public 

Convenience and Necessity, an Exemption, and a designation under the U.S.-Mexico Air 

Service Agreement (Dockels OST-2011-0076 & OST-1999-6663) 

Dear Mr. Kruger: 

By Application dated February 2, 2015, United Parcel Service Co. r UPS-) applied for an 

amended Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity, an Exemption, and a designation 

under the U.S.-Mexico Air Service Agreement. 

UPS has polled all interested parties, and no party has objected to the Application. For this 

reason , UPS respectfully requests that the Department promptly grant the requested authority. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Holland & Knight LLP 

Anita M. Mosner 

Jennifer M. Nowak 

Attorneys for United Parcel 

Service Co. 

Atlanta I Bethesda I Boston I Chicago I Fort Lauderdale I Jacksonville I Lakeland I Los Angeles I Miami I New YorX 

Northern Virginia I Orlando I Portland I San Francisco I Tallahassee I Tampa I Washington. DC I West Palm Beach 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing document on the persons identified 

below by causing a copy to be sent by electronic mail. 

howard.kass@aa.com 

robert.wirick@aa.com 

dan.weiss@united.cam 

steve.morrissey@united.com 

nssparks@fedex.com 

gbleopard@fedex.com 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com (Counsel for Amerijet) 

jcanny@amerijet.com 

ihitl@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian and JetBlue) 

perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian and JetBlue) 

john.fredericksen@suncQuntry,com 

thomas.ting@suncQuntry.com 

bob.kneisley@wnco.com 

leslie.abbott@wnco.com 

matwQod@cQzen.com (Counsel for Frontier) 

slachter@cQzen.com (Counsel for Frontier) 

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit) 

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit) 

dheffernan@cozen.com (Counsel for Alaska) 

Jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com 

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com (Counsel for ABX) 

Barbara.russell@virginamerica.com 

John.varley@virginamerica.com 

rpommer@atlasair.com 

brett.kruger@dot.gov 

john.s.duncan@faa.gov 

cristinasa@state.gov 

P

~.e

\ 

ter Ormerod 

rC= ' .-----~ February 5, 2015
#### Paul Samuel PETERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 76-1171.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 18, 1977.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Karen M. Gottlieb, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Joel D. Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HAVERFIELD and NATHAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *James v. State,*334 So.2d 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                           AER ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.
                         (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

                         COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           PERIOD FROM JULY
                                                                           17, 1989 (DATE OF
                               YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,                    INCEPTION) TO
                      ------------------------------------------           DECEMBER 31,
                          1996          1995           1994                   1996
                      ------------  -------------  -------------  -----------------------------
<S>                   <C>           <C>            <C>                     <C>
Weighted average
  Common Stock
  outstanding......    22,673,126     17,228,972     14,904,822              11,214,248
Common Stock issued
  and stock options
  granted in
  accordance with
  Staff
Accounting Bulletin
  No.83............            --             --             --               1,470,525
                      -----------   ------------   ------------   -----------------------------
   Total:..........    22,673,126     17,228,972     14,904,822              12,684,773
                      ===========   ============   ============   =============================
Net loss...........   $(7,559,321)  $(10,198,195)  $(10,188,824)           $(45,693,079)
                      ===========   ============   ============   =============================
Per share amount...        $(0.33)        $(0.59)        $(0.68)                 $(3.60)
</TABLE>
255 La. 166

#### CITY OF HOUMA v. LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY.

No. 50320.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 16, 1970.

In re: Louisiana Power and Light Company applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction. y
C OURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANNY THOMAS MOLINA

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 318

- C R

Appeal from the

112 th District Court

of Upton County, Texas

(TC# 16

- 03

- U1125

- D S M )

O R D E R

The record before us does not contain the trial court’s certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal. T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court is ordered to prepare and file with

the trial court clerk within thirty days from the date of this order a certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal as required by T EX .R.A PP .P. 25.2(a)(2) and 25.2 (d). The trial court clerk shall

prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the certification and file it with this Court no

later than February 13 , 201 7

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30 th day of December , 20 1 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-358]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 
to 9675

    Notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree modification 
in United States v. Accurate Partitions Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 
S91-00646M, was lodged on December 20, 1996 with the United States 
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend 
Division. The proposed consent decree resolves the United States' 
claims against four settling defendants and sixteen settling de minimis 
defendants for unreimbursed past costs incurred in connection with the 
Fisher-Calo Superfund Site located in Kingsbury, Indiana in return for 
a total payment of $333,000.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Accurate Partitions Corp., et al., DOJ Ref. #90-11-2-
549.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 204 South Main Street, MO1 Federal Building, 
South Bend, Indiana 44601; the Region 5 Office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604; 
and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, 
Washington, D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent 
decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In 
requesting a copy please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $8.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Walker Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-358 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7448 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make permanent the authority 

of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to conduct a telework 

travel expenses program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. CONNOLLY (for himself and Mr. HICE of Georgia) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to make permanent 

the authority of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to conduct a telework travel expenses program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telework for U.S. In5 novation Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7448 IH

1 SEC. 2. TELEWORK TRAVEL EXPENSES PROGRAM OF THE 

2 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK 

3 OFFICE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5711 of title 5, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in the section heading, by striking ‘‘test’’; 

7 (2) in subsection (f)— 

8 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

9 (i) in the matter preceding subpara10 graph (A), by striking ‘‘committee’’ and in11 serting ‘‘committees’’; and 

12 (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

13 ‘‘Government’’; 

14 (B) in paragraph (2)— 

15 (i) by striking ‘‘test’’; and 

16 (ii) by striking ‘‘section, including the 

17 provision of reports in accordance with 

18 subsection (d)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘sub19 section’’; 

20 (C) in paragraph (4)(B), in the matter 

21 preceding clause (i), by inserting ‘‘and main22 tain’’ after ‘‘develop’’; and 

23 (D) in paragraph (5)— 

24 (i) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

25 ‘‘test’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7448 IH

1 (ii) by striking subparagraph (B) and 

2 inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(B) The Director of the Patent and Trademark Of4 fice shall prepare and submit to the appropriate commit5 tees of Congress an annual report on the operation of the 

6 program under this subsection, which shall include— 

7 ‘‘(i) the costs and benefits of the program; and 

8 ‘‘(ii) an analysis of the effectiveness of the pro9 gram, as determined under criteria developed by the 

10 Director.’’; and 

11 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘this section’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)’’. 

13 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

14 The table of sections for subchapter I of chapter 57 of 

15 title 5, United States Code, is amended by striking the 

16 item relating to section 5711 and inserting the following: 

‘‘5711. Authority for telework travel expenses programs.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134147 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, ROBERT AUSLANDER and CAROL	 Justices 

AUSLANDER,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 134147 

 COA: 274079 

Oakland CC: 2004-061286-NH 

ALLAN W. CHERNICK, M.D., 

CARDIOVASCULAR SPECIALISTS, P.C.,

HOWARD S. GOLDBERG, M.D., and 

HOWARD S. GOLDBERG, M.D., P.C., 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals, for 

the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals dissenting opinion, and we REMAND this case 

to the Oakland Circuit Court for entry of a judgment granting the defendants’ motion for 

summary disposition.

 KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

d1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2007 

 Clerk