alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: John J. Englander

To: LEVIN, NANCY

Cc: Tax, Wienke; Lisa M. Tomczak

Subject: FW: EPA Question on Data Completeness Payson PM10, 1Q-2005

Date: Monday, June 17, 2013 4:15:08 PM

Attachments: Payson Q1 2005 - details.xls

Nancy,

I asked our Data Management folks about the data from Q1 2005 in Payson, the following is

what they found. Hopefully this is what you need.

Let me know if you have any questions-

-John

John J. Englander

ADEQ- Air Quality Division

phone: (602) 771-4781

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

From: Heather Colson 

Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 12:49 PM

To: John J. Englander

Cc: Lisa M. Tomczak; John R. Olasin

Subject: RE: EPA Question on Data Completeness Payson PM10, 1Q-2005

John,

I have worked with Kanika and John O. to piece together, best we can, of what was going on

with the 2005 data. It looks like 6 of the 8 invalid values were due to an issue with the

weighing / lab issue, 1 was due to an under run, and 1 was due to an over run.

Since the data completeness is below 50% no data substation should be done. At least that is

my understanding.

I have attached more documentation to give you more summary / details if needed. Please let

me know if you any other questions about these data. Thank you.

Heather Colson

602.771.4488

NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended

only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged

and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law,

and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this email and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named

above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you.
T his d o cu m ent i s pro tec t ed Attorney W o rk P r oduc t r eq u es t ed by co u nsel i n anti ci pati o n of lit i gati o n

. D o no t d is cl ose with o ut c o n se nt o f c o unse l.

United Taconite Fairlane Plant For bes, Minnesota Barr Engineering Co. July 29, 2004



### TAB LE1 7

SULFUR MASS BALANCE AND REMOVAL DETERMINATION

Parameter Test Date Test Period . Waste Gas Stack 2A \ Waste Gas Stack 2B

··-· ---- · --·-·- -------- ..**-- ---** **-- -~** **-- ::-=::-=-,--** **-1** 6/9/2004 ' 6/9/2004**--- --** **--- ---** **~---:-=- 1643-2017**  0920-1440 * Fuel Consumption Rate, TPH 7.70 ** Fuel Moisture Content 1.33 * Greenball Feed Rate, L TPH (to Grate) * Greenball Mo i sture Content, % -- 605

-

_ _ _ _ j_

__ __ 5

__ 9

_

4

- --- 9.74

·--·-- ---- - · - · - -· - · ..**·~·-··- ·**  

### -- --- 

### ·-··-···-· - ·--·-- ----- Taconite P roduc tion Rate , LTPH 513

. 512

**Fuel sulfLi i-

- corlten T. % 

# ;rry-
-- - - - -- --- - - - ----- -- -- · 2
· :37

- · - - - - -- --- I

# ·:_t~ee~~~-~~**~u~~ ~~~~~%** **~!Y =----=** **= =** **~- -~** **~ :-~=**  

# =**~ ~~** **= o~** **:-: =-----** **-- --** **-J Taconite Sulfur Content, %dry 0

. 002

### Totalsliifur** ni:>u****~lE 1**  > - - - - - · -



# _ =_ 

# = == - -=

_

-

_ -

:_ -_·_- -.: 3 -=- 9

-

=7
·---- ---l Sulfur Output with Fired Pellets, lb/hr (2) 23 ; 23 Sulfur Loading to Scrubbers, lb/hr (3) 374 

# i 374 Sulfur Dioxide Loading to Scrubbers, lb/hr (4) ; 748 

# i 748 Average Sulfur Dioxide Loading Rate to Scrubbers, 

## i 7 48 Sulfur D io xi de Emission Rate from Scrubbers , lb/ hr , 633**--- ---** **---- ~~** **----- ---1**  Sulfur Dioxide Removal Efficiency,% 15.4 * From Process Data **Laboratory Resu l ts *** Corrected Fuel Tonnage (1) Sulfur Input, lb/hr = [(Greenball Feedrate to Kiln,L TPH x 2240 lb/L T) x (1-Greenball Moisture Content, %/1 00) x (Greenball Sulfur Content, %/1 00)] + [(Fuel consumption Rate , TPH x 2000 lb/ t on) x (1-Fuel Moisture Content, %/100) x (Fuel Sulfur Content,%/100)

(2) Sulfur Output with Fired Pellets = (Fired Pellet Production Rate, L TPH x 2240 lb/L T) x ( Fired Pellet Sulfur Content, %/1 00)
(3) Sulfur Load ing Rates to Scrubbers= (Sulfur Input- Sulfur Output wi t h Fired Pellets)
(4) S0 2 Loading Rate to Scrubbers = Sulfur Loading Ra te, lb/hr x lb mol/32 lb sulfur x 64 lb S0 2 /It

(5) As Determined from EPA Method 6C Stack Tests (comb i n ed average emissions from both sta
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33419]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:10 a.m. on 
Tuesday, December 16, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
relating to the Corporation's personnel and supervisory activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Joseph H. Neely (Appointive), seconded by Director Ellen S. Seidman 
(Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by Director 
Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of the Currency), and Acting Chairman 
Andrew C. Hove, Jr., that Corporation business required its 
consideration of the matters on less than seven days' notice to the 
public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the 
public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a 
meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be 
considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), 
(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of the ``Government in the 
Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and 
(c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: December 16, 1997.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James D. LaPierre,
Deputy Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33419 Filed 12-18-97; 1034 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice (97-018)]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that MICRO CLEAN of Ashley, New York, 
has applied for an exclusive license to practice the invention 
described and claimed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/678,100, 
entitled ``CONTAMINATION SAMPLING DEVICE,'' which is assigned to the 
United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Written objections to 
the prospective grant of a license should be sent to Marshall Space 
Flight Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by April 15, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert L. Broad, Jr., Patent Counsel, 
Marshall Space Flight Center, Mail Code CC01, Huntsville, AL 35812; 
telephone (205) 544-0021; fax (205) 544-0258.

    Dated: February 2, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-3820 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
CALL BY: CALL TO: Organization: Date: Time: PMN: 15-0607 Organization:
Phone: Concerning what? CBI: No MEMORANDUM of TELEPHONE CONVERSATION (Contains No TSCA CBI)
dhillogoa01a01a02a69.jpg








FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


Investor Contact:Tom Line-Chief Financial Officer614-255-5989 (tline@diamond-hill.com)





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


ANNOUNCES SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM





Columbus, Ohio - September 25, 2018 - Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.  (the "Company," "we," "our") (NASDAQ:DHIL) today announced that its board of directors has authorized its management to repurchase Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. common shares (the “Shares”) having an aggregate purchase price of up to $50,000,000.  The authority to repurchase Shares will be exercised from time to time as market conditions warrant, is subject to regulatory considerations and will expire in two years.  Thomas E. Line, chief financial officer, noted, “The Company continues to demonstrate solid profitability while generating significant amounts of cash.  As of June 30, 2018, the Company had cash and marketable securities in excess of $200 million and no debt.  Furthermore, we currently anticipate strong cash flow for the balance of 2018. Management and the board believe the most appropriate uses for excess cash are to continue to invest in Diamond Hill Funds, pay dividends, and repurchase Shares.”  The timing, amount and other terms and conditions of any repurchases will be determined by the Company’s management at its discretion based on a variety of factors, including the market price of the Shares, corporate considerations, general market and economic conditions and legal requirements.  It is possible that no Shares will be repurchased.  The repurchase program may be modified, discontinued or suspended at any time.  The Company currently intends to fund the program through cash on hand and future cash flow.








About Diamond Hill :


We are an independent investment management firm with significant employee ownership and $22.6 billion in assets under management as of August 31, 2018.  We provide investment management services to institutions and individuals through mutual funds, institutional separate accounts, an exchange traded fund, and private investment funds.  Our entire investment team shares the same intrinsic value investment philosophy focused on absolute returns, and our interests are firmly aligned with our clients through significant investment in its strategies.  For more information visit www.diamond-hill.com .
No. D-2243.

#### In re Disbarment of McKee.

Roger A. McKee, of Phoenix, Ariz., is suspended from the practice of law in this Court, and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### August 22, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT In re: KENT EDWIN FICKEN; ROBERTA PAULINE FICKEN, Debtors.

___________________________ No. 10-1276 KENT EDWIN FICKEN; ROBERTA PAULINE FICKEN, Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant - Appellant. (BAP No. 09-042-CO)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HARTZ , ANDERSON , and TYMKOVICH , Circuit Judges. The dispositive legal issue in this appeal has been resolved by this court’s opinion inUnited States v. Dawes , No. 09-3129, 2011 WL 2450930 (10th Cir.-2- June 21, 2011). We REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. ENTERED FOR THE COURT Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge
254 La. 860

#### LEVINGSTON SUPPLY COMPANY, Inc. v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 50143.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: United Bonding Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 216 So.2d 158.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
August 31, 2015 

Dear Mr. Aschoff: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA-2015-1802). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 9/14/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
**Exhibit** **32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Gregory L. Burns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ GREGORY L. BURNS        |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Gregory L. Burns            |
| *Chief Executive Officer*** |
| March 12, 2008         |
p130355.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0355 Focus Ready Draft 4/15/2013
ENGINEER: Jon \ AH PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER: Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America

MSDS: Yes Label: No
Gen Eqpt: All material handling equipment that may generate dust clouds of the product should have properly designed explosion relief/suppression systems. Wear safety glasses or splash goggles, protective gloves. Respirator: NIOSH-approved dust mask. Health Effects: Eye: Powder may cause mechanical irritation. Skin / Ingestion: No adverse effects known or expected. Inhalation: May cause unpleasant dust deposits in the nasal passages. Fumes from processing can cause irritation to certain sensitive individuals and aggravate preexisting lung disorders. TLV/PEL: Not established for product.

CRSS : Chemical Name: Phenol, 2,6-dimethyl-, homopolymer, ether with 2,2',3,3',5,5'-hexamethyl[1,1'-biphenyl]-4,4'-diol (2:1), bis[(ethenylphenyl)methyl] ether S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: 1200.00 1.00%<500 34.00%<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: Neat: Solid Mfg: NK, imported Proc/Form: Solution or dispersion, 10-30% in formulation End Use: Destroyed upon curing. GPC NAVG = 1200 with 1% <500 and 34% <1000. The sum of the repeating units, m+n, ranges between 1 and 50. Submitted data: mp = 80°C, ws = 0 g/L, solubility in 2-butanone >800 g/L, d = 1.07 g/cc, LogP > 14.73. Estimated data: bp >500°C, vp <1E-6 torr (high MW), ws <1E-6 g/L (structure). Vinylbenzene FGEW (worst case, end-capped): 1200/2 = 600.

Consumer Use: No
SAT (concerns) (04/09/2013): Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T1 Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water
Page 1p130355.eng OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: No P2 information provided.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0355

Number of Sites/ Location: 5 Park Electrochemical Corp Tempe AZ 85251 Rogers Corp. Chandler AZ 85226 Days/yr: 260

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Potential air release < 0.54 Page 2p130355.eng kg/site-day. Incineration release << 28,000 kg/site-day and 698,000 kg/site-yr. Negligible migration to groundwater per SAT. However, note water release is assessed due to SAT concern for drinking water.

Water or Air or Incineration or Landfill Output 2: 1.9E-1 kg/site-day over 260 days/yr from 5 sites or 2.5E+2 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill Output 2: 3.8E-1 kg/site-day over 260 days/yr from 5 sites or 5.0E+2 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill Conservative: 3.8E-1 kg/site-day over 260 days/yr from 5 sites or 5.0E+2 kg/yr

Landfill Output 2: 1.0E-1 kg/site-day over 260 days/yr from 5 sites or 1.3E+2 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL 1.4E+3 kg/yr - all sites

Page 3p130355.eng

Page 4
HII-EX10.18 2013 10-K - Amendment to HII Supplemental Plan 2-OSERP








EXHIBIT 10.18


AMENDMENT TO 
APPENDIX G TO THE HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN 2—OFFICERS SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PROGRAM (OSERP) 


WHEREAS, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (the “Employer”) maintains Appendix G to the Huntington Ingalls Industries Supplemental Plan 2-Officers Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “OSERP”), has the reserved right to amend the OSERP and now wishes to do so; 


NOW, THEREFORE, effective January 1, 2014 the OSERP is hereby amended as follows:


1.    Add a new Section G.13 at the end thereof to read as follows:


G.13    Forfeiture of Benefits due to Voluntary Termination. This Section applies to a Participant who first becomes eligible under this Program on or after January 1, 2014. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Program, if the Participant resigns, retires or otherwise experiences a voluntary Termination of Employment within three years after the date of the Participant’s initial eligibility under this Program, the Participant shall forfeit 100% of his or her total accrued benefit under this Program. The Compensation Committee or its delegate will, in its sole discretion, determine whether a Participant’s accrued benefit is subject to forfeiture under this Section G.13; provided that no forfeiture shall occur if the Participant’s Termination of Employment is due to mandatory retirement pursuant to Company policy, death, disability, involuntary termination without cause or the divestiture of the Participant’s business unit. Any forfeiture pursuant to this Section will also apply with respect to survivor benefits or benefits assigned under a Qualified Domestic Relations Order. 


2.    The OSERP, as amended herein, is hereby ratified and affirmed in all other respects.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized representative on this 15th day of January , 2014.


HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.


                    
                    	
	
	By: /s/ William R. Ermatinger

	William R. Ermatinger
Vice President and Chief, Human Resources Officer
#### Hoyt HALL et al. v. Louis MARTIN et al.

No. 47441.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 1, 1974.

Flavous L. Hutchinson, Tupelo, for appellants.

Parker, Randle & Winston, P. A., Tupe-lo, for appellees.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and BROOM, JJ-

Appeal from Chancery Court, Lee County; J. D. Doty, Chancellor.

Affirmed.
1 Gift cards offered by retailers (such as stores and restaurants) fall under the

Federal Trade Commission’s jurisdiction, while those offered by depository institutions do not. 

The Office of Comptroller of the Currency has issued a guidance on disclosures and marketing

issues for gift cards issued by national banks. See OCC Bulletin 2006-34 (Aug. 14, 2006). 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

August 14, 2007

K. Butler

Re: In the Matter of Kmart Corporation, Kmart Services Corporation, and

Kmart Promotions, LLC, corporations

FTC File No. 062 3088 

Dear K. Butler:

Thank you for the comments you submitted regarding the above-referenced matter. Your

comments were placed on the public record pursuant to Section 2.34 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 2.34, and were given serious consideration by the Commission.

The Commission anticipates that this proposed consent order will send a strong message

that retailers1

 must adequately disclose these material conditions when selling gift cards. Indeed,

over the last few years, the Commission staff has observed that many retailers have already

changed their marketing practices. While many retailers eliminated expiration dates or fees

altogether, staff has found generally that disclosures by retailers still imposing fees have

improved. After considering all of the factors that must be weighed in evaluating any settlement,

including the specific facts, consumer injury, and the need to ensure that the remedies deter

similar behavior by other retailers, the Commission concluded that the strong injunctive

provisions and mandatory refund provision provide a positive result for consumers and an

appropriate resolution of this case.

After considering your comments, the Commission has determined that the public

interest would best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without

modification. Respondents will be required to comply with the Order’s injunctive and

reimbursement provisions, and will be subject to potentially large civil penalties if they violate

the Order.
Page 2

Please remember that you may access the Commission’s Consumer Hotline at (202)

326-3569 for updated information about how to receive a refund if your Kmart gift card was

charged dormancy fees. 

Thank you again for your comments. The Commission is aided in its analysis by hearing

from a variety of sources in its work, and it appreciates your interest in this matter.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioners Harbour and Leibowitz concurring in

part and dissenting in part.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
1 

# EPA Action on Previous 

# HSRB Recommendations2 

# October 2009 HSRB Reviews  Review of 2 published studies concerning the effects of exposure to pyrethrins/pyrethroids on asthma and other allergies  Final paper will summarize studies, note their limitations, and cite HSRB review  Weight of evidence not affected by these studies  AEATF aerosol protocol  Amended to incorporate EPA and HSRB comments  To be executed soon3 

# Repellent Protocol Reviews June 2009  

## LNX- 002 Field Repellency of 2 Picaridin Formulations to Biting Flies October 2009  

## LNX- 003 Laboratory Repellency of 2 

## Picaridin Formulations to 2 Tick Species