alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEHC 12.31.13 EX 10.10








EXHIBIT 10.10


SUMMARY OF KEY TERMS OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
 WITH MIDAMERICAN ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY
 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS


MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company's ("MEHC") continuing named executive officers each receive an annual salary and participate in health insurance and other benefit plans on the same basis as other employees, as well as certain other compensation and benefit plans described in MEHC's Annual Report on Form 10-K. 


The named executive officers are also eligible to receive a cash incentive award under MEHC's Performance Incentive Plan ("PIP"). The PIP provides for a discretionary annual cash award that is determined on a subjective basis and paid in December. In addition to the PIP, the named executive officers are eligible to receive discretionary cash performance awards periodically during the year to reward the accomplishment of significant non-recurring tasks or projects. Mr. Gregory E. Abel has not been granted discretionary cash performance awards in the past five years. Messrs. Patrick J. Goodman and Douglas L. Anderson and Ms. Maureen E. Sammon are participants in MEHC's Long-Term Incentive Partnership Plan ("LTIP"). Mr. Abel does not participate in the LTIP. A copy of the LTIP is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the MEHC Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Mr. Abel is a participant in MEHC's Incremental Profit Sharing Plan ("IPSP"). Messrs. Goodman and Anderson and Ms. Sammon do not participate in the IPSP. A copy of Mr. Abel's IPSP is attached as Exhibit 10.2 to the MEHC Annual Report on Form 10-K. 


Base salary for continuing named executive officers for MEHC's fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, is shown in the following table:


	
				
	Name and Title
	Base Salary

	Gregory E. Abel
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
	$
	1,000,000
	


	Patrick J. Goodman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$
	450,000
	


	Douglas L. Anderson
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
	$
	339,000
	


	Maureen E. Sammon
Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
	$
	260,000
	







Mr. Abel is a director of MEHC, but does not receive additional compensation for his service as a director other than what he receives as an employee of MEHC. The other members of the MEHC board of directors do not receive compensation for their service as directors.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 710 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 710

  To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide pay to employees 
  excepted from furlough during a Government shutdown, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2019

  Mr. Welch introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide pay to employees 
  excepted from furlough during a Government shutdown, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Never Again Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING SALARIES TO EXCEPTED EMPLOYEES DURING A GOVERNMENT 
              SHUTDOWN.

    Section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, is amended in 
subsection (c), as added by the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act 
of 2019, by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
    ``(2)(A) Each employee of the United States Government or of a 
District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of a 
covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the 
lapse in appropriations, at the employee's standard rate of pay, at the 
earliest date possible after such lapse in appropriations ends, 
regardless of scheduled pay dates.
    ``(B)(i) With respect to the lapse in appropriations beginning on 
or around December 22, 2018--
            ``(I) each excepted employee who was required to perform 
        work during the period beginning on the first day of such lapse 
        and ending on the date of enactment of the Never Again Act 
        shall be paid for such work, at the employee's standard rate of 
        pay, at the earliest date possible after the date of enactment, 
        regardless of scheduled pay dates; and
            ``(II) for the remainder of such lapse, each excepted 
        employee who is required to perform work during such remainder 
        shall be paid for such work, at the employee's standard rate of 
        pay, on the employee's scheduled pay dates.
    ``(ii) During any covered lapse in appropriations beginning after 
the lapse in appropriations described in clause (i) ends, each excepted 
employee who is required to perform work during a covered lapse in 
appropriations shall be paid for such work, at the employee's standard 
rate of pay, on the employee's scheduled pay dates.
    ``(iii) There are appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry 
out this subparagraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30040

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK O. OGBEIDE,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-18

____________________________________________

August 19, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Patrick Ogbeide appeals his conviction for making false claims

against the United States (submitting false income tax returns for

three persons). He contends that the district court erred by

admitting his 1991 1040 income-tax return and accompanying refund

check into evidence, and that the evidence was insufficient to
- 2 -

support his conviction.

Ogbeide’s 1040 form was intrinsic evidence; it was prepared

along with the returns forming the basis of Ogbeide’s conviction as

part of a single scheme to defraud. The admission of the form was

not an abuse of discretion. United States v. Coleman, 78 F.3d 154,

156 (5th Cir. 1996). Ogbeide did not object in the district court

to the admission of the refund check, and he has not shown that its

admission was plain error. See United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d

160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 115

S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

Regarding sufficiency of the evidence, Ogbeide contends only

that the evidence did not show that he was the perpetrator. The

evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to have found beyond

a reasonable doubt that Ogbeide prepared the false income-tax

returns on which his conviction was based. See United States v.

Okoronkwo, 46 F.3d 426, 430 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, __ U.S. __,

116 S. Ct. 107 (1995).

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Lon J. Olejniczak, certify that:
1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ML Life InsuranceCompany of New York;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Dated:March 27, 2008    /s/ LON J. OLEJNICZAK
EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT




     Katz Communications, Inc.
     Domicile:      Delaware


     Banner Radio Sales, Inc.
     Domicile:      Delaware


     Christal Radio Sales, Inc.
     Domicile:      Delaware


     Eastman Radio Sales, Inc.
     Domicile:      Delaware


     Seltel Inc.
     Domicile:      Delaware


     Katz Millennium Marketing Inc.
     Domicile:      Delaware


     Katz Cable Corporation
     Domicile:      Delaware


     The National Payroll Company, Inc.
     Domicile:      Delaware


     The Cable Company, Inc. (dormant)
     Domicile:      Delaware


     Katz International Limited
     Domicile:      England


     Katz Television Sales Limited
     Domicile:      England


     Katz Radio Sales Limited
     Domicile:      England
PINNP.2013.12.29 EX 10.29








EXHIBIT 10.29
AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN TERMS
 OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  
(Robert J. Gamgort)
THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of December 16, 2013 by and between Pinnacle Foods Inc. (the “Company”), and Robert J. Gamgort (the “Executive”).  
The Company is a party to an employment agreement with the Executive entered into as of July 13, 2009 (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time, the “Employment Agreement”);
Executive and the Company mutually agree that in furtherance of best practices related to corporate governance and executive compensation, it is in the best interests of the Executive and the Company to terminate the Employment Agreement, and for the terms of the Executive’s employment to be determined in the discretion of the Board and subject to the applicable plans, policies, and practices of the Company and its Affiliates.
In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:  
1.Effective as of the date hereof, the Employment Agreement shall be, and hereby is, terminated in all respects, and each party shall have no further rights or obligations pursuant thereto, other than  with respect to those provisions which are intended to survive the term of the Employment Agreement, including, without limitation, Section 8 (Non-Competition), Section 9 (Confidentiality; Intellectual Property), Section 10 (Specific Performance) of the Employment Agreement.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, following the termination of the Employment Agreement, the Executive shall continue to be entitled to receive previously deferred amounts described in Section 4(b) of the Employment Agreement and the Transaction Incentive Award described in Section 4(c) of the Employment Agreement, in each case on the terms set forth therein.
2.The waiver of Executive’s rights under the Employment Agreement is irrevocable to the fullest extent provided under the laws of the State of Delaware and may not be amended or otherwise modified without the prior written consent of the Company and Executive. This Agreement will inure to the benefit of and bind (a) the Executive and, upon the Executive’s death, Executive’s heirs, executors and legal representatives of the undersigned Executive and (b) any successor of the Company. 
3.This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to conflicts of laws principles thereof.   






 

075529-0003-13471-Active.15110134.2










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written.   
	
		
	Pinnacle Foods Inc.

	By:
	/s/ M. Kelley Maggs

	Name:
	M. Kelley Maggs

	Title:
	Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel






Accepted and agreed to on this 16th day of December, 2013:




	
	
	/s/ Robert J. Gamgort

	Robert J. Gamgort







075529-0003-13471-Active.15110134.2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-185-018]


Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Refund Report

February 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 9, 1996, Northern Natural Gas Company 
(Northern) tendered for filing a Report of Refunds showing refunds that 
were made to Northern's customer on November 8, 1996 pursuant to 
Article II of the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement (Settlement) 
filed in the referenced docket on March 15, 1996 and approved by the 
Commission on July 31, 1996.
    Northern states that copies of the filing were served upon the 
company's customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington D.C., 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protest must be filed on 
or before February 19, 1997. Protest will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken in this 
proceeding, but will not serve to make Protestant a party to the 
proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3852 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8285-8286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4666]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following open meeting during the 
week of February 24, 1997.
    An open meeting will be held on Thursday, February 27, 1997, at 
9:00 a.m., in Room 1C30.
    The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
February 27, 1997, at 9:00 a.m., will be:

    The Commission will consider whether to propose for public 
comment: (i) amendments to Form N-1A under the Investment Company 
Act of 1940 and the Securities Act of 1933, which would revise the 
disclosure requirements for mutual fund prospectuses to focus 
prospectus disclosure on essential information about a particular 
fund that

[[Page 8286]]

would assist an investor in deciding whether to invest in that fund; 
(ii) rule 498 under the Securities Act and the Investment Company 
Act, which would permit investors to buy mutual fund shares based on 
a summary document, or profile, that would provide key information 
about a mutual fund; and (iii) rule 35d-1 under the Investment 
Company Act, which would require mutual funds and other registered 
investment companies with names suggesting that the company focuses 
on a particular type of investment (e.g., a fund that calls itself 
the ABC Stock Fund, the XYZ Bond Fund, or the 123 Government Fund) 
to invest at least 80% of its assets in the type of investment 
suggested by its name. For further information please contact: 
Elizabeth R. Krentzman or Kathleen K. Clarke, (202) 942-0721.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: February 20, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4666 Filed 2-20-97; 3:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
The aircraft mentioned above travels at a maximum speed of 35.7 mph and is powered by

a 60 00mAh LiPo battery. It has a semi-autonomous navigation system run by the DJI Pi lot Application through a Samsung SM-G920V , which is mounted on the remote controller. The Phantom 3 uses First Person Viewing (FPV) from a monitor that is in high definition. Flights can be pre-programmed with precision GPS guidance and do not require human intervention. In the case of unplanned events, the operator may allow the aircraft to follow the pre-programmed evasive maneuvers from the controller or enable assisted steering for direct control. The pilot software is equipped with telemetry that shows altitude (AGL), airspeed, vertical ascent/decent speed, battery strength and direction of flight. In the event of a malfunction, the aircraft has a fail-safe mode that enables the machine to automatically return and land within one meter of where it took off. In addition, the aircraft is programmed to fly back to where it took off in the event of the battery level going below 20 percent strength. These features are tested on a regular basis to insure that they function properly.

Carroll Engineers PLLC has owned and operated the Phantom 3 for four months and have logged

ove r 50 hours of flight time. The PIC has been piloting UAS aircraft for more than a year and has logged 250 hours of flight time as Pilot-In-Command (PIC). The PIC has been operating radio controlled airplanes and helicopters for more than 5 years. He also holds a BLS/CPR certificate.

T he UAS will always be flown in Class G airspace and will conform to all regulation regarding proximity to airports and other restricted areas.

The PIC will always use a Visual Observer. The two will carefully review the flight plan prior to each takeoff and will maintain constant communication throughout the flight. The maximum altitude for any flight is 400 feet (AGL). All flights with the Inspire 1 are conducted within visual line of sight (VLOS). Favorable weather conditions is paramount in any of my flying. I strictly adhere to daytime only flying, with surface winds being below 15 mph, clouds at a minimum of 500 feet above my maximum flying altitude as well as 2000 feet horizontal clearance.

A thorough pre-flight inspection will be performed prior to each flight, making sure that all parts of the aircraft and GCS are in good working order. I regularly change props and run periodic tests on the batteries to ensure they are in optimum condition. I carefully check each motor, making sure the props spin freely without any roughness or abnormal sound. It is my practice to review, on a regular basis, the Phantom 3 Maintenance Manual and User Manual (both of these manuals are included in my petition as attachments). I maintain two logbooks - a pilot log and a maintenance log. I have provided more details about pre-flight inspection in the section on Safety Protocols and System Controls

.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the
undersigned officer of Sysview Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation
("Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and
belief, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
         2007 (the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
         all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

                        Date: August 7, 2007
                        /S/ WILLIAM HAWKINS
                        -------------------
                        William Hawkins, Acting Chief Financial Officer, Chief
                        Operating Officer and Secretary

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.
Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Gregory L. Burns, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Gregory L. Burns
-------------------------------
Gregory L. Burns
Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2005
#### Joanne M. DAVIDSON, Petitioner, v. Robert W. TYSON, Jr., Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-1273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 28, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.