alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

7653

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 33

Wednesday, February 19, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Executive Order 13036 of February 15, 1997

Establishing an Emergency Board To Investigate a Dispute

Between American Airlines and its Employees Represented

by the Allied Pilots Association

WHEREAS, a dispute exists between American Airlines and its employees

represented by the Allied Pilots Association; and

WHEREAS, the dispute has not heretofore been adjusted under the provisions

of the Railway Labor Act, as amended (45 U.S.C. 151–188) (the ‘‘Act’’);

and

WHEREAS, in the judgment of the National Mediation Board, this dispute

threatens substantially to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree that

would deprive sections of the country of essential transportation service,

NOW, THEREFORE, by the authority vested in me as President by the

Constitution and the laws of the United States, including sections 10 and

201 of the Act, 45 U.S.C. 160 and 181, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Establishment of Emergency Board (‘‘Board’’). There is established,

effective February 15, 1997, a Board of three members to be appointed

by the President to investigate this dispute. No member shall be pecuniarily

or otherwise interested in any organization of airline employees or any

air carrier. The Board shall perform its functions subject to the availability

of funds.

Sec. 2. Report. The Board shall report to the President with respect to

the dispute within 30 days of its creation.

Sec. 3. Maintaining Conditions. As provided by section 10 of the Act, from

the date of the creation of the Board and for 30 days after the Board

has submitted its report to the President, no change in the conditions out

of which the dispute arose shall be made by the parties to the controversy,

except by agreement of the parties.

Sec. 4. Records Maintenance. The records and files of the Board are records

of the Office of the President and upon the Board’s termination shall be

maintained in the physical custody of the National Mediation Board.

Sec. 5. Expiration. The Board shall terminate upon the submission of the

THE WHITE HOUSE,

February 15, 1997.

report provided for in sections 2 and 3 of this order.

œ–

[FR Doc. 97–4302

Filed 2–18–97; 10:52 am]

Billing code 3195–01–P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3


                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO

                        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                           OMEGA HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.

                                     *****


         Omega Health Systems, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation") hereby certifies that the amendment set forth below to the
Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware:

         The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended
by deleting Article I thereof and by substituting, in lieu thereof, the
following new Article I:

         The name of the corporation is VISIONAMERICA INCORPORATED.

         All remaining provisions of this Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Omega Health Services, Inc. has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be executed and attested by its officers thereunto
duly authorized this 11th day of August, 1999.

                                    OMEGA HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC.



                                    By: /s/ Thomas P. Lewis
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            Thomas P. Lewis
                                            President and CEO



Attest:


/s/ Ronald L. Edmonds
--------------------------------------
Ronald L. Edmonds
Secretary
UNITED STATES

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             _______________________

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                             _______________________

                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                               December 2, 2010

                       Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                      Ohio
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)

             000-24498                              65-0190407
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Commission File Number)         (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

      325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio         43215
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

Item 8.01.    Other Events
----------   --------------------------------------------

          As of November 30, 2010, preliminary assets under management totaled
$7.934 billion.  Following is a summary as of November 30, 2010 (in millions):


Separate Accounts	 	$  2,879
Mutual Funds 			   4,854
Private Investment Funds	     201
                                --------
Total			       	$  7,934

Investment Strategy
-------------------
Small Cap			$    876
Small-Mid Cap         	             180
Large Cap 			   4,121
Select                               396
Long-Short		           2,182
Strategic and Fixed Income     	     179
				--------
Total			        $  7,934


                                    SIGNATURE
                                    ---------

     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


Date: December 2, 2010	                    By: /s/ James F. Laird
                                            -------------------------------
                                            James F. Laird, Chief Financial
                                            Officer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 21

SYPRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The Companys subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:



| | (1) | Sypris Test & Measurement, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Sypris Electronics, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Sypris Data Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Sypris Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Sypris Technologies Marion, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | Sypris Technologies Kenton, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------



| | (7) | Sypris Technologies Mexican Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (8) | Sypris Technologies Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican limited liability company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (9) | Sypris Technologies Toluca, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7223 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7223

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify certain requirements 
   of the railway-highway crossings program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2020

 Mr. Pence (for himself and Ms. Brownley of California) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to modify certain requirements 
   of the railway-highway crossings program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railway Upgrades for Rural American 
Lines Act'' or the ``RURAL Act''.

SEC. 2. RAILWAY-HIGHWAY CROSSINGS PROGRAM.

    Section 130 of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(1)(A) by striking ``and the 
        installation of protective devices'' and inserting ``, the 
        installation of protective devices, and the replacement of 
        functionally obsolete warning devices'';
            (2) in subsection (f)(3) by striking ``90 percent'' and 
        inserting ``100 percent''; and
            (3) in subsection (i)(3)(B) by striking ``$7,500'' and 
        inserting ``$100,000''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4491]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Art Advisory Panel--Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting of art advisory panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in 
Washington, DC.

DATE: The meeting will be held April 8th and 9th, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on 
April 8th and 9th, 1997 in Room 240 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Aerospace 
Center Building, 901 D Street, SW, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Carolan, C:AP:AS:4 901 D Street, 
SW, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone (202) 401-4128, (not a toll free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988), 
that a closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on April 
8th and 9th, 1997 in Room 240 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Aerospace Center 
Building, 901 D Street, SW, Washington, DC 20024.
    The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the 
acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved 
in federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the 
discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by 
the provisions of section 6103 of Title 26 of the United States Code.
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned 
with matters listed in section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7) of Title 5 
of the United States Code, and that the meeting will not be open to the 
public.
    The Commissioner of Internal Revenue has determined that this 
document is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive 
Order 12866 and that a regulatory impact analysis therefore is not 
required. Neither does this document constitute a rule subject to the 
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6).
Margaret Milner Richardson,
Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
[FR Doc. 97-4491 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-U
#### Betty Jo DIXON, formerly Betty Jo Moody, Appellant, v. Howard Wilson MOODY, Appellee.

No. FF-485.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 13, 1977.

*951Jerry R. Poole, of Pinkston & Poole, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Floyd G. Yeager, Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

BOYER, Judge.

No recitation of facts is necessary to resolve the two issues presented by this appeal nor to announce or clarify (if such be necessary) the controlling law.

Appellant first contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence, over her objection, in a proceeding by her seeking an increase in child support payments awarded by a prior final judgment in a dissolution proceeding, as to the value of property awarded to her by that final judgment pursuant to a pre-judgment stipulation of the parties. We hold that it was and is properly within the discretion of a trial judge, when considering an award of child support or a modification thereof, to allow evidence of, and to consider, any and all assets owned by either or both parties, regardless of the source of those assets. The source from which the possessing party obtained a particular asset, and the nature of the asset (viz: whether fixed or liquid) are factors which may be considered by the trial court, and it is not error to admit evidence of the existence and possession of the asset. (For a somewhat similar holding see *Birge v. Simpson,*280 So.2d 482 (Fla. 1st. DCA 1973)).

Appellant next urges that the trial court erred in the amount by which the child support was increased. Although the increase in award was, in our view, conservative, we cannot.hold, giving the order of the trial court the presumption of correctness required by law, that he abused his discretion and thereby erred.

AFFIRMED.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet of Farmers Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the nine
month period ended September 30, 1999 (unaudited) and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000


<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         158,062
<SECURITIES>                                    50,146
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               722,775
<PP&E>                                         732,307
<DEPRECIATION>                                 313,978
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,659,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          452,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,055,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,659,677
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,439,878
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,574,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                833,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                   326,986
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            506,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   506,589
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
EC

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

1 

MEMORANDUM 

TO: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG 

FROM: Bradley Nelson, EC/R, Inc. 

DATE: September 17, 2009 

SUBJECT: Summary of the September 11, 2009 Teleconference with the Engine 

Manufacturers Association and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to 

discuss the Final NSPS for Stationary CI Engines 

1.0 INTRODUCTION 

The Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) requested this teleconference with EPA to 

discuss issues with the final new source performance standards (NSPS) for stationary 

compression ignition (CI) engines. This main topic of this meeting was to discuss alternative 

particulate matter (PM) testing methods for diesel engines greater than 30 liters per cylinder (30 

l/cyl). This meeting summary will be available in the docket for this rulemaking (Docket ID No. 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0295). The final NSPS for stationary CI engines was published in the 

Federal Register on July 11, 2006 (71 FR 39154). 

2.0 ATTENDEES 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Melanie King, OAQPS/SPPD/ESG 

Peter Westlin, OAQPS/SPPD/MPG 

Gary McAlister, OAQPS/AQAD/MTG 

Engine Manufacturers Association

Joe Suchecki 

Caterpillar

Gordon Gerber 

Brady Winkleman 
2 

Euromot

Johan Boij, Wartsila 

EC/R Incorporated (EPA Contractor)

Bradley Nelson 

3.0 SUMMARY OF MEETING 

The industry group started the teleconference by stating that it wanted to discuss the use 

of EPA Method 5 in the final CI NSPS (40 CFR part 60, subpart IIII) for stationary diesel 

engines greater than 30 l/cyl. Industry is concerned that the exhaust gas from these engines is 

typically 480 to 660°F and would need to be cooled considerably to perform the EPA Method 5 

sampling. According to EMA, in order to collect PM data from a stationary diesel engine greater 

than 30 l/cyl, it would have to cool the exhaust gas to approximately 250°F to perform the EPA 

Method 5 test. EPA further indicated that it will review the information used to set the final 

standards for greater than 30 l/cyl engines to determine the method that was used to collect the 

PM data. EMA indicated it would check with their members to see if any of them have collected 

PM test data since promulgation of the rule. 

EMA asked for an update of the changes that are planned for the CI NSPS. EPA 

responded that while internal agency recommendations have been made, no decisions have been 

finalized at this point. EPA indicated that it is planning to prepare a draft version of the rule 

amendments in October of this year and expects to propose the rule amendments for public 

comment by February 2010.
#### Clifford MITCHELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-853.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Indian River County; D. C. Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7328 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7328

 To make temporary changes to grants made under the Community Services 
        Block Grant Act to facilitate local coronavirus relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2020

     Mr. DeSaulnier (for himself and Mr. Thompson of Pennsylvania) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make temporary changes to grants made under the Community Services 
        Block Grant Act to facilitate local coronavirus relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Services Block Grant 
Enhancement Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. DISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN FUNDS APPROPRIATED FOR THE COMMUNITY 
              SERVICES BLOCK GRANT ACT.

    (a) Distribution of CARES Act Funds to States.--Section 675B(b)(3) 
of the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9906(b)(3)) shall 
not apply with respect to funds appropriated by the CARES Act (Public 
Law 116-136) to carry out the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 
U.S.C. 9901 et seq.).
    (b) Increased Poverty Line.--For purposes of carrying out the 
Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9901 et seq.) with any 
funds appropriated for any of the fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022 for 
such Act, the term ``poverty line'' as defined in section 673(2) of 
such Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)) means 200 percent of the poverty line 
otherwise applicable under such section (excluding the last sentence of 
such section) without regard to this subsection.
    (c) Distribution of CARES Act Funds by States to Eligible 
Entities.--Funds appropriated by the CARES Act (Public Law 116-136) to 
carry out the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9901 et 
seq.) and received by a State shall be made available to eligible 
entities (as defined in section 673(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
9902(1)(A)) not later than either 30 days after such State receives 
such funds or 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
whichever occurs later.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8304-8305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4465]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION


Aviation Proceedings; Agreements Filed During the Week Ending 
February 14, 1997

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the provisions of 49 U.S.C 412 and 414. Answers 
may be filed within 21 days of date of filing.
    Docket Number: OST-97-2127.
    Date filed: February 11, 1997.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC2 EUR-AFR 0010 dated February 7, 1997 r1; PTC2 EUR-AFR 
0011 dated February 7, 1997 r2-3; PTC2 EUR-AFR 0012 dated February 7, 
1997 r4, Expedited Resolutions (Summaries attached.)


[[Page 8305]]


    Intended effective date: March 14/March 15/April 1, 1997.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-4465 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P