alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 28, 2012

Via e-mail: celia.sher@hq.doe.gov

Ms. Celia Sher

Attorney Advisor

Office of the General Counsel

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20585

Subject: Memorandum of meeting between DOE and CEA on functional adder 

issues relating to energy standards and consumer electronics

Dear Ms. Sher:

This correspondence is to inform the Department of Energy for the record that the Consumer 

Electronics Association (CEA) met with DOE staff on February 22, 2012, regarding “functional 

adder” issues relating to energy standards and consumer electronics.

Attending the February 22nd meeting for CEA were Douglas Johnson (CEA), Chuck Samuels (outside 

counsel for CEA), Holly Evans (consultant for Bose), and Steve Whitaker (consultant for Bose). 

Participating in this meeting with CEA by telephone were the following: David Cassano (Apple),

Timothy Cassidy (Best Buy), and Cecilia Martaus (AT&T).

As explained during the meeting, the term “functional adder” is essentially a wattage budget allocated 

to a particular product function or set of functions in the context of an energy efficiency program 

requirement, such as an ENERGY STAR specification.

The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the legal and policy aspects of recognizing the additional 

merging and evolving functions of products such as those, for example, which nominally might be 

described as set-top boxes or battery chargers. Use of product classes, test procedure allowances, and 

other regulatory and non-regulatory approaches were discussed.

Sincerely,

/s/

Douglas K. Johnson

Vice President, Technology Policy
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7253-7254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal National Heritage Corridor 
Commission Meeting

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces an upcoming meeting of the Delaware and 
Lehigh Navigation Canal National Heritage Corridor Commission. Notice 
of this meeting is required under the

[[Page 7254]]

Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463).

MEETING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 19, 1997; 1:30 p.m. until 
4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Holland Art Collection, 111 N. 4th Street, Allentown, PA 
18102.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on implementation of the 
Management Action Plan for the Delaware and Lehigh Canal National 
Heritage Corridor and State Heritage Park. The Commission was 
established to assist the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its 
political subdivisions in planning and implementing an integrated 
strategy for protecting and promoting cultural, historic and natural 
resources. The Commission reports to the Secretary of the Interior and 
to Congress.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal 
National Heritage Corridor Commission was established by Public Law 
100-692, November 18, 1988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Executive Director, Delaware and 
Lehigh Navigation Canal, National Heritage Corridor Commission, 10 E., 
Church Street, Room P-208, Bethlehem, PA 18018, (610) 861-9345.

Gerald R. Bastoni,
Executive Director, Delaware and Lehigh Navigation Canal NHC 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-4083 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-PE-M
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50810 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MARIO GONZALEZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 292

- 4

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Mario Gonzalez has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Gonzalez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brie f and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
June 21 , 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50810 Document: 00513557946 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 50810

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50810 Document: 00513557946 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00307-CR

The State of Texas

v.

Gilbert Rangel

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18FC-5876H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 31, 2019
#### Bonnie McKNIGHT v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT.

No. 38273.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Habeas Corpus denied without opinion.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     In connection with the Form 10-Q of DeanHolding Company (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Gregg L. Engles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES      Gregg L. Engles     *Chief Executive Officer*
Date: August 16, 2004
Note: This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7823

GARY RAMON JOHNSON-BEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOSEPH SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3720-MJG) Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Ramon Johnson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gary Ramon Johnson-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson-Bey v. Sacchet , No. CA-97-3720-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Opinion issued November 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00572-CV

———————————

PROGRESSIVE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

DONALD JAMES WILKINS, Appellants/Cross-Appellees

V.

PREDISTELL ROBINSON AND MAENETTA ROBINSON, 

Appellees/Cross-Appellants

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2013-41593

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Progressive County Mutual Insurance 

Company and Donald James Wilkins, have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss

this appeal, stating the parties have settled. Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Predistell 
2

Robinson and Maenetta Robinson have also filed an unopposed motion to dismiss 

their cross-appeal because the parties have settled. Appellants and CrossAppellants move for entry of an opinion dismissing their appeals to effectuate their 

settlement agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). No opinion has issued. 

Accordingly, we grant the motions and dismiss the appeals. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.
#### Jack Martin FARLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-653.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 23, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7509 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the TSA to offer certain 

secondary screenings of passengers prior to a physical inspection if an 

object of concern is detected, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2020 

Mr. COHEN (for himself and Mr. CARSON of Indiana) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the TSA 

to offer certain secondary screenings of passengers prior 

to a physical inspection if an object of concern is detected, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TSA Second Screening 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF SECONDARY SCREENING. 

7 Subparagraph (B) of section 44901(l)(2) of title 49, 

8 United States Code, is amended by inserting before the 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7509 IH

1 period at the end the following: ‘‘, including by ensuring 

2 passengers undergoing such screening are afforded an op3 portunity to undergo a second such screening prior to un4 dergoing a physical inspection if such initial screening de5 tects an object of concern’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10 (jj)



               Summary of Fiscal Year 1998 Cash Bonus Opportunity
                  for the President and Chief Executive Officer

The Company provided Ronald L. Skates,  President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, a bonus opportunity by which Mr. Skates would be entitled to earn a
cash  bonus for the 1998  fiscal  year  based on the  Company's  performance  as
measured against specified goals relating to earnings-per-share  (with a maximum
of 300% of base  salary),  or, if  greater,  a cash  bonus  equal to 1.5% of the
increase in the Company's market capitalization during the fiscal year, based on
the 30-day average price of the Company's Common Stock as of the end of the 1998
fiscal year compared  against the 30-day  average price of the Company's  Common
Stock  as of the end of the 1997  fiscal  year  (subject  to a  maximum  of $3.5
million,  except in the event of a change of control).  The Board also  reserved
the right to adjust this bonus in the event of extraordinary transactions and to
award other bonuses.
Exhibit 16.1

                         [Deloitte & Touche Letterhead]


SENT VIA MESSENGER AND FACSIMILE

May 29, 2009

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street N.E.
Washington D.C.
United States of America
20549-7561

Attention: Office of the Chief Accountant
           and
           H. Christopher Owings, Assistant Director, Corporation Finance

Dear Sirs/Madams:

RE: ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS WORLDWIDE, INC.

We have read Item 4 of Environmental Solutions Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company")
Form 8-K/A (No. 2) dated May 15, 2009, and we agree with the statements made
therein. For clarification, please note that we were not engaged to perform any
review for interim periods occurring after the December 31, 2008 year end of the
Company.

Yours truly,

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Chartered Accountants
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

Copy to: Mr. Nitin Amersey, Chairman of the Board
         Mr. Michael F. Albanese, Audit Committee Chair
         Mr. Praveen Nair, Chief Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<CIK>   0001000375
<NAME>   ESSEX HOSPITALITY ASSOCIATES IV L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            444
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<FN>
<F1>                  UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET USED
</FN>
<PP&E>                                          7,350
<DEPRECIATION>                                     27
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0
<BONDS>                                         9,798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        573
<FN>
<F2>                      EQUITY IS PARTNERS' CAPITAL
</FN>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,459
<SALES>                                           420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  437
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  333   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (24)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (24)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (24)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (10)
<FN>
<F3> ENTITY IS A PARTNERSHIP, EPS IS LOSS PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3343]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Emergency 
Review by the Office of Management and Budget

    The Social Security Administration publishes a list of information 
collection packages that will require clearance by OMB in compliance 
with P.L. 104-13 effective October 1, 1995, The Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995. The information collection listed below has been submitted to 
OMB for emergency clearance. OMB approval has been requested by 
February 7, 1997:
    0960-NEW. The information collected on form SSA-538 will be used by 
SSA and the State Disability Determination Services (DDS) to record 
medical and functional findings concerning the severity of impairments 
of children claiming SSA benefits based on disability. The form will be 
used for initial determinations of eligibility, in appeals and in 
initial continuing disability reviews. The respondents are State DDS 
offices.
    Number of Respondents: 1,066,000.
    Frequency of Response: 1.
    Average Burden Per Response: 20 minutes.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 355,333 hours.
    To receive a copy of the form or clearance packages, call the SSA 
Reports Clearance Officer on (410) 965-4125 or write to her at the 
address listed below. Written comments and recommendations regarding 
the information collection(s) should be directed to the OMB Desk 
Officer and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at the following addresses:

(OMB), Office of Management and Budget, OIRA, Attn: Laura Oliven, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10230, 725 17th St., NW, Washington, 
D.C. 20503
(SSA), Social Security Administration, DCFAM, Attn: Judith T. Hasche, 
6401 Security Blvd, 1-A-21 Operations Bldg., Baltimore, MD 21235

    Dated: February 5, 1997.
Frederick W. Brickenkamp,
Team Leader, FMRCT, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-3343 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4190-29-P
## Mount Zirkel/Rawah - Worst - Total Extinction Mount Zirkel/Rawah - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction MOZI1 NIA 2001 24 28.61 MOZI1 NIA 2001 24 2.94 MOZI1 NIA 2002 21 40.12 MOZI1 NIA 2002 21 2.28 MOZI1 NIA 2003 23 32.27 MOZI1 NIA 2003 23 1.54 MOZI1 NIA 2004 22 24.03 MOZI1 NIA 2004 22 1.87 

## 125.03 Total 8.63 Total 31.2575 Average 2.1575 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 7% Mount Zirkel/Rawah - Best - Total Extinction Mount Zirkel/Rawah - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction MOZI1 NIA 2001 23 13.19 MOZI1 NIA 2001 23 0.63 MOZI1 NIA 2002 20 11.58 MOZI1 NIA 2002 20 0.48 MOZI1 NIA 2003 22 11.34 MOZI1 NIA 2003 22 0.57 MOZI1 NIA 2004 22 11.23 MOZI1 NIA 2004 22 0.36 

## 47.34 Total 2.04 Total 11.835 Average 0.51 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 4% Rocky Mountain - Worst - Total Extinction Rocky Mountain - Worst - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction ROMO1 NIA 2000 22 41.91 ROMO1 NIA 2000 22 2.48 ROMO1 NIA 2001 25 39.03 ROMO1 NIA 2001 25 7.65 ROMO1 NIA 2002 24 53.44 ROMO1 NIA 2002 24 8.68 ROMO1 NIA 2003 23 39.98 ROMO1 NIA 2003 23 3.21 ROMO1 NIA 2004 25 33.25 ROMO1 NIA 2004 25 4.29 

## 207.61 Total 26.31 Total 41.522 Average 5.262 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 13% Rocky Mountain - Best - Total Extinction Rocky Mountain - Best - NO3 Extinction

Site Method Year N T o t a l Extinction Site Method Year N NO3 Extinction ROMO1 NIA 2000 21 12.97 ROMO1 NIA 2000 21 0.46 ROMO1 NIA 2001 24 12.76 ROMO1 NIA 2001 24 0.29 ROMO1 NIA 2002 23 12.03 ROMO1 NIA 2002 23 0.25 ROMO1 NIA 2003 23 12.95 ROMO1 NIA 2003 23 0.26 ROMO1 NIA 2004 24 12.4 ROMO1 NIA 2004 24 0.38 

## 63.11 Total 1.64 Total 12.622 Average 0.328 Average 2000-2004 Average Annual Nitrate Share of Particle Light Extinction 3%
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
April 30, 2005:

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Del Global  Technologies  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Walter
F. Schneider,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350,  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section  15(d),  as applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                           /s/ Walter F. Schneider
                                           -------------------------
                                           Name: Walter F. Schneider
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date: June 14, 2005

      (1)   A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906
            has  been  provided  to Del  Global  Technologies  Corp  and will be
            retained  by Del Global  Technologies  Corp.  and  furnished  to the
            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
            U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
            as a separate disclosure document.
```