alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tyrone ST. ROMAIN and Benny Gremillion.

No. 54435.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 15, 1974.

In re: State of Louisiana through the District Attorney, Eddie Knoll applying for Writs of Certiorari, Prohibition, Mandamus and for Stay Order.

Granted. See Order (attached).

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Earl Edwards Judge of the Twelfth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Avoyelles, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 25th day of February, 1974, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on the 25th day of February, 1974, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
EXHIBIT 31.1

 CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         AND ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K

I, Richard Banakus, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hydron Technologies,
   Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:

   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation); and

   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
   registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
   directors:

   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

/s/ Richard Banakus
-------------------
Richard Banakus
Interim President, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
August 15, 2005
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gordon T. SCHMIDT.

No. 61214.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 13, 1978.

In re: Gordon T. Schmidt applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of Rapides.

Granted. The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Guy E. Humphries, Judge of the 9th Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Rapides, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 26th day of January, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
#### Cleveland FRAZIER, Petitioner, v. The CITY OF MIAMI, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 43734.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 31, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 274 So.2d 552.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                          27,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    562,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               634,100
<PP&E>                                         298,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 116,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 869,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,700
<BONDS>                                        329,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     248,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   869,500
<SALES>                                        925,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               925,200
<CGS>                                          487,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  898,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.24

 

Compensation Summary Sheet for Stephen M. Sloan

 

Stephen M. Sloan serves as the Senior Vice President, Products and Engineering of Marketo, Inc. (the “Company”). Mr. Sloan’s employment with the Company is “at will” and for no specific period of time. From his start date on July 1, 2013 to November 6, 2013, Mr. Sloan had an annual base salary of $250,000 and an annual target bonus of $75,000. Effective as of November 6, 2013, Mr. Sloan had an annual base salary of $275,000 and an annual target bonus of $125,000. The actual bonus amount paid to Mr. Sloan for 2013 was $101,349.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3411]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Department of Defense Wage Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee will be held on 
March 4, 1997; March 11, 1997; March 18, 1997; and March 25, 1997; at 
10:00 a.m. in Room A105, The Nash Building, 1400 Key Boulevard, 
Rosslyn, Virginia.
    Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the 
Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the 
criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be 
considered are related to internal rules and practices of the 
Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were 
obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that 
the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: February 6, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-3411 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CFO PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                             |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| \s\                        Kathleen A. Browne    |   |   |        |
| Kathleen                  A. Browne              |   |   |        |
| Chief                          Financial Officer |   |   |        |

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2018

No. 04-18-00676-CV

IN RE ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY AND LATINA PRUITT

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On September 20, 2018, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of 

the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest 

may file a response to the petition in this court no later than October 26, 2018. Any such 

response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on October 11, 2018.

PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: ___________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CV01324, styled Samuel Bernal v. Allstate Fire and Casualty 

Insurance Company and Latina Pruitt, pending in the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas, the 

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, presiding.
Exhibit
32.1



SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION*

(Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)



Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of QSGI INC., hereby
certifies, to such officers’ knowledge, that:



(1)
the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QA of QSGI INC. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2011 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of the period ended June 30, 2011.



|Date:
    August 27, 2014 |  | /s/
    Marc Sherman                                                                 
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          |  | Marc
                                         Sherman
        Chief Executive Officer



__________________

*
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language
in such filing.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Infotest International

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 2, 1997, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), InfoTEST International 
(``InfoTEST'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, American 
Medical Outcomes Repository; Government Services, Information Systems 
Branch; and The Lewis Group are no longer members of InfoTEST.
    No other changes have been made in the membership, nature or 
objectives of the consortium. Membership in InfoTEST remains open, and 
the consortium intends to file additional written notifications 
disclosing all changes in membership.
    On December 7, 1993, InfoTEST filed its original notification (as 
the National Information Infrastructure Testbed) pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on May 18, 1994 
(60 FR 25960).
    The last notification was filed with the Department of Justice on 
October 9, 1996. A notice was published in the Federal Register on 
December 19, 1996 (61 FR 67067).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-4376 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
259 La. 793

#### Beulah HEBERT et al. v. Kenneth M. STANSBURY et al.

No. 51638.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 13, 1971.

In re: Kenneth M. Stansbury, Joan Marie Mouton and Marie Frank Elmer, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 248 So.2d 873.

Writ refused. A reconsideration under the applicable principles of law would lead to the same result reached by the Court of Appeal.
J^^^AcNl Of 

TADGERSON CONSULTING \St i OPEi^AJinU4106 Presidents Wav " "" '"^ 

DeWitt, MI 48820 li}i! Fll'ij ? | r:> :>. m 

February 10,2012 

Doekei Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

West Building Ground Floor. Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

-Rer:^Sun.Coiintry.S!ot.Exemption—Docket-Number FAA-2012-0089 -

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from ihe slot limil for Ronald Reagan 

Washington National Airport (DCA) set forth in § 93.123(a), to permit the FAA lo create 

air carrier slots during certain limited hours for Sun Country's use. The proposed air 

carrier slots would replace two slot exemptions under DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to 

Sun Country. On January 6, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for Ihe District of 

Columbia Circuit vacated the DOT Order, and Sun Country will lose its existing service 

between DCA and Lansing's Capital Region International Airport. Specifically Sun 

.Country desires one daily slot during each of the 1000 and 1100 hours. The proposed 

exemption would permit Sun Country to continue operation its existing services and 

avoid an inequitable result of the Court's order. 

As Vice Chair of the Mid-Michigan Business Travel Coalition and a Lansing region 

business owner for past 40 years, I wish to emphasize the importance of continued 

service between DCA and Lansing, 'fhe flights are very highly utilized and the success 

demonstrated to-date is showing no signs of reversal. The flights are proving to be an 

clear economic boost for the Greater Lansing region; and I would like to add my voiecjo_. 

.the.many who-areusingthc service and are cognizant of the economic impact of the 

losing the flights. I earnestly urge approval of the Sun Country's request. 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater Lansing 

Region. The daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service lo Washington 

Reagan Airport, in the state of Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior to Sun Country, the 

regional community had requested the introduction of this service from numerous other 

airline operators without success. Accordingly, it is critical that ihe.FAA take the 

necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the Sun Country slots.at the established ' 

flight times in support of the Greater Lansing's business and economic growth. ' 
Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to enter flight 

schedules for sale for the balance of 2012, will be greatly appreciated. 

Sincerely, 

Raymona IE. laagexsot 

President and CEO " 

Tadgerson Consulting
<PAGE>




                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
          
                         
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-05009 and 333-74733) of Eclipse 
Surgical Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 29, 1999, appearing 
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by 
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedules, which appears 
in this Form 10-K.

                                               PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP



                         

San Jose, California
March 30, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1138-1139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-400]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Regulatory Guide; Issuance, Availability

    The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued a new guide in its 
Regulatory Guide Series. This series has been developed to describe and 
make available to the public such information as methods acceptable to 
the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the Commission's 
regulations, techniques used by the staff in evaluating specific 
problems or postulated accidents, and data needed by the staff in its 
review of applications for permits and licenses.
    Regulatory Guide 10.12, ``Preparation of Petitions for Rulemaking 
Under 10 CFR 2.802 and Preparation and Submission of Proposals for 
Regulatory Guidance Documents,'' provides guidance to persons who 
submit petitions for rulemaking to the NRC concerning the type and 
quantity of information that would allow the NRC to process the 
petition in an expeditious manner. This guide also provides the 
procedures for submitting proposals to change existing regulatory 
guidance documents.
    Comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in 
guides currently being developed or improvements in all published 
guides are encouraged at any time. Written comments may be submitted to 
the Publications Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and 
Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
    Regulatory guides are available for inspection or copying for a fee 
at the Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L Street NW., 
Washington, DC. Single copies of regulatory guides, both active and 
draft, may be obtained free of charge by writing the Office of 
Administration, Attn: Distribution and

[[Page 1139]]

Services Section, USNRC, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by fax at (301) 
415-2260. Issued guides may also be purchased from the National 
Technical Information Service on a standing order basis. Details on 
this service may be obtained by writing NTIS, 5285 Port Royal Road, 
Springfield, VA 22161. Regulatory guides are not copyrighted, and 
Commission approval is not required to reproduce them.

(5 U.S.C. 552(a))

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of December 1996.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David L. Morrison,
 Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research.
[FR Doc. 97-400 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P