13948 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 48 / Wednesday, March 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA. For information on the availability of 

this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 

28, 2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–05436 Filed 3–11–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0104; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AEA–4] 

RIN 2120–AA66 

Proposed Amendment and Revocation 

of Jet Routes; Northeast United States 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

modify segments of jet routes J–64 and 

J–80, and remove jet route J–77, in the 

northeastern United States. The FAA is 

proposing this action because segments 

of these routes are receiving minimal to 

no usage due to other more efficient 

routes in the area. This action would 

eliminate unneeded route segments, 

reduce chart clutter and improve chart 

readability. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 28, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001; telephone: 

(202) 366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0104 and 

Airspace Docket No. 13–AEA–4 at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Gallant, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Office of Airspace 

Services, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; 

telephone: (202) 267–8783. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA– 

2014–0104 and Airspace Docket No. 13– 

AEA–4) and be submitted in triplicate to 

the Docket Management Facility (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number). You may also submit 

comments through the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters wishing the FAA to 

acknowledge receipt of their comments 

on this action must submit with those 

comments a self-addressed, stamped 

postcard on which the following 

statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2014–0104 and 

Airspace Docket No. 13–AEA–4.’’ The 

postcard will be date/time stamped and 

returned to the commenter. 

All communications received on or 

before the specified comment closing 

date will be considered before taking 

action on the proposed rule. The 

proposal contained in this action may 

be changed in light of comments 

received. All comments submitted will 

be available for examination in the 

public docket both before and after the 

comment closing date. A report 

summarizing each substantive public 

contact with FAA personnel concerned 

with this rulemaking will be filed in the 

docket. 

Availability of NPRM’s 

An electronic copy of this document 

may be downloaded through the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. 

You may review the public docket 

containing the proposal, any comments 

received and any final disposition in 

person in the Dockets Office (see 

ADDRESSES section for address and 

phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and 

5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. An informal 

docket may also be examined during 

normal business hours at the office of 

the Eastern Service Center, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Room 210, 

1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 

30337. 

Persons interested in being placed on 

a mailing list for future NPRM’s should 

contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, 

(202) 267–9677, for a copy of Advisory 

Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Distribution System, which 

describes the application procedure. 

Background 

On October 20, 2011, the FAA 

amended part of the high altitude route 

structure in the northeastern United 

States to expedite the routing of 

westbound traffic departing the New 

York Metropolitan area and to realign 

high altitude overflight traffic to help 

reduce delays within New York 

terminal airspace (76 FR 57902). The 

new and amended routes from that 

action have enhanced air traffic flows in 

the area and have become the routes of 

primary use. The FAA determined that 

jet route J–77, and portions of jet routes 

J–64 and J–80, are receiving minimal 

usage and have been made essentially 

redundant by other, more efficient route 

options available in that area. 

The Proposal 

The FAA is proposing an amendment 

to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) part 71 to eliminate portions 

of jet routes J–64 and J–80 and to 

remove jet route J–77 in the 

northeastern United States. The 

proposed changes would eliminate 

segments that no longer benefit the 

efficiency of the National Airspace 

System, reduce chart clutter and 

improve readability of the affected 

Enroute High Altitude charts. The 

proposed route changes are outlined 

below. 

J–64: J–64, currently extending 

between Los Angeles, CA, and 

Robbinsville, NJ, would terminate at the 

intersection of the Ravine, PA, 102°(T)/ 

113°(M) radial and the Lancaster, PA, 

044°(T)/053°(M) radial. This new 

termination point would be at the 

SARAA fix, approximately 65 nautical 

miles northwest of the current end point 

Robbinsville, NJ. 

J–77: J–77, currently extending 

between Boston, MA, and Westminster, 

MD, would be removed. Other routes 

are available for navigation between the 

Baltimore, MD, area and Boston, MA. 

J–80: J–80, currently extending 

between Oakland, CA, and Bangor, ME, 

would terminate at Bellaire, OH, 

eliminating the segments between 

Bellaire and Bangor, ME. RNAV route 

Q–480 and jet route J–581 provide 

alternative routing between Bellaire, 

OH, and Bangor, ME. 

Where new navigation aid radials are 

cited in a proposed route description, 

below, both True and Magnetic degrees 

are listed. Otherwise, only True degrees 

are stated. 

Jet routes are published in paragraph 

2004 of FAA Order 7400.9X dated 

August 7, 2013, and effective September 

15, 2013, which is incorporated by 

reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The jet routes 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 48 / Wednesday, March 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules 13949 

in this document would be 

subsequently published in the Order. 

The FAA has determined that this 

proposed regulation only involves an 

established body of technical 

regulations for which frequent and 

routine amendments are necessary to 

keep them operationally current. 

Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) 

Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of 

Transportation (DOT) Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; 

February 26, 1979); and (3) does not 

warrant preparation of a regulatory 

evaluation as the anticipated impact is 

so minimal. Since this is a routine 

matter that will only affect air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this proposed rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. 

This rulemaking is promulgated 

under the authority described in 

Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 

40103. Under that section, the FAA is 

charged with prescribing regulations to 

assign the use of the airspace necessary 

to ensure the safety of aircraft and the 

efficient use of airspace. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority as 

it modifies the route structure as 

necessary to preserve the safe and 

efficient flow of air traffic in the 

northeastern United States. 

Environmental Review 

This proposal will be subject to an 

environmental analysis in accordance 

with FAA Order 1050.1E, 

‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and 

Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final 

regulatory action. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Proposed Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as 

follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 7, 2013 and 

effective September 15, 2013, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 2004—Jet Routes 

* * * * * 

J–64 [Amended] 

From Los Angeles, CA, via INT Los 

Angeles 083° and Hector, CA, 226° radials; 

Hector; Peach Springs, AZ; Tuba City, AZ; 

Rattlesnake, NM; Pueblo, CO; Hill City, KS; 

Pawnee City, NE; Lamoni, IA; Bradford, IL; 

via the INT of the Bradford 089° and the Fort 

Wayne, IN, 280° radials; Fort Wayne; 

Ellwood City, PA; Ravine, PA; to INT Ravine 

102°(T)/113°(M) and Lancaster, PA, 044°(T)/ 

053°(M) radials. 

J–77 [Removed] 

J–80 [Amended] 

From Oakland, CA; Manteca, CA; Coaldale, 

NV; Wilson Creek, NV; Milford, UT; Grand 

Junction, CO; Red Table, CO; Falcon, CO; 

Goodland, KS; Hill City, KS; Kansas City, 

MO; Spinner, IL; Brickyard, IN; to Bellaire, 

OH. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 6, 

2014. 

Donna Warren, 

Acting Manager, Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group. 

[FR Doc. 2014–05356 Filed 3–11–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration 

29 CFR Part 2550 

RIN 1210–AB53 

Amendment Relating to Reasonable 

Contract or Arrangement Under 

Section 408(b)(2)—Fee Disclosure 

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, Labor. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This document contains a 

proposed amendment to the final 

regulation under the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 

(ERISA or the Act) requiring that certain 

service providers to pension plans 

disclose information about the service 

providers’ compensation and potential 

conflicts of interest. The amendment 

would, upon adoption, require covered 

service providers to furnish a guide to 

assist plan fiduciaries in reviewing the 

disclosures required by the final rule if 

the disclosures are contained in 

multiple or lengthy documents. This 

amendment will affect pension plan 

sponsors and fiduciaries and certain 

service providers to such plans. 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed amendment should be 

received by the Department on or before 

June 10, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be 

submitted to the addresses specified 

below. All comments will be made 

available to the public. Warning: Do not 

include any personally identifiable 

information (such as name, address, or 

other contact information) or 

confidential business information that 

you do not want publicly disclosed. All 

comments may be posted on the Internet 

and can be retrieved by most Internet 

search engines. Comments may be 

submitted anonymously. Comments 

may be submitted to the Department of 

Labor, identified by RIN 1210–AB08, by 

one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Email: e-ORI@dol.gov. 

• Mail or Hand Delivery: Office of 

Regulations and Interpretations, 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, Room N–5655, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210, 

Attention: RIN 1210–AB08; 408(b)(2) 

Guide. 

Comments received by the 

Department of Labor may be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and http://

www.dol.gov/ebsa, and made available 

for public inspection at the Public 

Disclosure Room, N–1513, Employee 

Benefits Security Administration, 200 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20210. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Allison Wielobob, Office of Regulations 

and Interpretations, Employee Benefits 

Security Administration, (202) 693– 

8500. This is not a toll-free number. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

1. General 

On February 3, 2012, the Department 

published a final rule in the Federal 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS