alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT DEC 07, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 12043 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 1 - 0 1 5 4 7 - CV - A SG J U L I O C . G O M E Z , P e titio n e r - A p p e lla n t, v ersu s U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , R e s p o n d e n t- A p p e lle e .

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( D e c e m b e r 7, 2007) B efo re B A R K E T T , M A R C U S an d P R Y O R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: J ul i o G om e z appe a l s the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s de ni a l of hi s 28 U . S . C . § 22552

m ot i on t o va c a t e , s e ta s i de , orc orr e c thi s s e nt e nc e ba s e d on hi s c l a i m of i ne f f e c t i ve as si st ance of coun se l . G om ez cont ends thathi s c om pl ai nt s abo utthe performance o f h is c o u r t- ap p o in te d a tto rn e y , M r . J u lio G u tie rr e z , E s q ., a n d G o m e z ’s r e q u e s ts for s ub st i tut e c ou nsel cr ea t ed a c on fl i ctof i nt er es t s f or G ut i erre z thatprevent ed G u tie rr e z f

r o m a d e q u a te ly r e p r e s e n tin g h im . W hen revi ew i ng the di stri ctcourt ’ s deni al of a § 22 55 m ot i on , w e r evi ew qu es t i on s of l aw de no vo and fi nd i ng s of f ac tfor c l ea r e rr or. L ynn v . U ni t ed S t a t e s , 3 6 5 F . 3 d 1 2 2 5 , 1 2 3 2 ( 1 1 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) . A d e f e n d a n ta tt e m p t i n g t o s h o w a c o n f lic t o f in te r e s t r e s u ltin g in in e f f e c tiv e a s s is ta n c e o f

c o u n s e l “m u s t s h o w f

ir s t, thathi s a tt orney had an actual confl i ctof i nt er es t , and sec on d, thatthe confl i ct a dve r s e l y a f

f e c t e d c ouns e l ’ s pe r f

orm a nc e . ” P e gg v. U ni t e d S t a t e s , 253 F . 3d 1274, 12 77 (11th C i r. 20 01 ) ( em ph as i s om i tt ed). T he confl i ctca nn otbe m er el y possi bl e, s p e c u la tiv e , o rh yp o th e tic a l. R e y n o ld s v . C h ap m a n , 2 5 3 F .3 d 1 3 3 7 , 1 3 4 2 - 4 3 ( 1 1 th C i r. 20 01 ). W e w i l l no tfi nd an ac tual confl i ctof i nt er es tun l es s apet i t i on er“ ca n poi ntt o s pe c i f

i c i ns t a nc e s i n the r e c or d t o s ugge s ta n a c tua l c onf l i c tori m pa i rm e nt o f [ h is ] in te r e s ts .” I d . a t 1 3 4 3 ( c ita tio n o m itte d ) . S e ve r a l e vi de nt i a ry he a r i ngs w e r e he l d on thi s m a tt e ra nd ba s e d on the r e c or d, w e f

i nd no r e ve r s i bl e e rr or . W e f i nd m e r i t l e s s G om e z ’ s s e c ond a r gum e nt tha tthe di s tr i c tc our ti m pr ope r l y r e l i e d on tw o S e c ond C i r c ui tc a s e s a s bi ndi ng3

au th o ri ty. AF F I RME D.
#### DAN GRAVES MASONRY, INC., Appellant, v. James P. HALL, Appellee.

No. 71-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 17, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 14 2001

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT GARY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS,

INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-1587

(D.C. No. 98-D-1143)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRORBY , PORFILIO , and BALDOCK , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral

argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Plaintiff/appellant Robert Gary appeals from summary judgment granted in

favor of defendant/appellee U.S. West Communications, Inc. on his claims

brought pursuant to sections 1132 and 1140 of the Employee Retirement Income

Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, federal common law, and

state law. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The relevant facts are set forth in the district court’s thorough and wellreasoned order of November 24, 1999. On appeal, Mr. Gary argues that the

district court erred in holding that: (1) his claim for benefits should be dismissed

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) his evidence was insufficient to

support his claim for retaliation; and (3) dismissal of his case should be with

prejudice. “We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo ,

applying the same legal standard used by the district court pursuant to Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c).” Deboard v. Sunshine Mining & Ref. Co. , 208

F.3d 1228, 1237 (10th Cir. 2000). After reviewing the parties’ briefs and

conducting a de novo review of the record, this court concludes that the district

court correctly decided issues one and two for substantially the same reasons as

stated in the district court’s order. See Appellant’s App. Vol. IV, at 1040-50. As

U.S. West Communications points out, Mr. Gary did not appeal from the district

court’s determination that, notwithstanding Mr. Gary’s failure to administratively

appeal from the denial of benefits, U.S. West Communications did not abuse its
-3-

discretion in denying his disability claim. Thus, dismissal of the case with

prejudice was also proper. 

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of

Colorado is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
#### Carl Lee CALLEGARI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF CDC; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-15170.

D.C. No. CV-99-1685-WBS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

*845Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Carl Lee Callegari, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we affirm.

Because the record shows that Callegari did not exhaust prison grievance procedures prior to filing his claims against defendants Preece, Davis and Woodward, the district court properly entered judgment for the defendants. *See Booth v. Churner,*532 U.S. 731, 741 n. 6, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001) (requiring inmates to exhaust all available administrative remedies “irrespective of the forms of relief sought and offered through administrative avenues”). We construe the district court’s dismissal of the unexhausted claims as issued without prejudice. *See id.*at 734.

Callegari’s other contentions are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 3 0 6 7 3 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
.
B E N J A M I N H A R R I S ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 3 : 0 6

- C R

- 5 5

- 1

B e f o r e H I G G I N B O T H A M , G A R Z A , a n d E L R O D , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t B e n j a m i n H a r r i s , f e d e r a l p r i s o n e r # 0 4 5 4 9

- 0 9 5 , h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. H a r r i s h a s

n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f

r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 15 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-30673 Document: 00511382470 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,651                   3,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   67,209                  73,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,132)                 (4,978)
<INVENTORY>                                     60,718                  66,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,048                 189,108
<PP&E>                                         177,295                 164,293
<DEPRECIATION>                                (63,324)                (49,914)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,673                 352,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,540                 141,152
<BONDS>                                        150,000                       0
<COMMON>                                             5                      10
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (102,333)                  33,392
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   302,673                 352,000
<SALES>                                        539,030                 572,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               539,030                 572,474
<CGS>                                          376,328                 389,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,328                 389,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   701                   2,298
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,562                  18,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                134,026                  51,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,654                  12,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             82,372                  39,053
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (728)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,644                  39,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.34                    4.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.12                    3.92


</TABLE>
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of The
Banker's Store, Inc., a New York corporation (the "Company").  I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q/A of the
Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2008 and filed with the
U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 23, 2009
        --------------
                                           /s/ Thomas C. Cook
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Thomas C. Cook
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Principal Financial Officer

<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8262-8263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4392]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[NM-060-07-1110-(00) (0002)]


Intent of Seasonal Road Closure; Caprock Wildlife Habitat Area, 
Mescalero Sands, NM

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Intent of Seasonal Road Closure within the Caprock 
Wildlife Habitat Area at Mescalero Sands.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 43 CFR Part 8364, the Bureau of Land Management 
(BLM) will annually close a BLM-maintained road designated as Mathers 
TT329 to public access at State Highway 380 from March 1 through June 
1. This period may be extended earlier or later, or with additional 
closure periods imposed during the year, for Lesser prairie chicken 
research needs.

DATE: This action is effective March 1, 1997, and will remain in effect 
until the cessation of Lesser prairie chicken studies projected through 
the year 2001.

ADDRESSES: Maps showing the location of the access point from State 
Highway 380 that will be closed will be available at the BLM District 
Office, 2909 West 2nd Street, Roswell, New Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
T.R. Kreager, Area Manager, Roswell Resource Area, 2909 West 2nd 
Street, Roswell, New Mexico 88201-2019, Telephone (505) 627-0272.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Approximately six miles of caliche-surfaced 
road maintained by the BLM will be seasonally closed to the general 
public by the physical restriction of access from State Highway 380 at 
the following location:

New Mexico Principal Meridian

Caprock Wildlife Habitat Area, Mescalero Sands

T. 10 S., R. 31 E., Section 30: SWNE

    The access point is at State Highway 380, across from the Waldrop 
Rest Area (Mile Marker 196), approximately forty-two miles east of 
Roswell, New Mexico. The area restricted to public access is north of 
the highway.
    This temporary road and are closure will be in effect annually from 
March 1, 1997, until the cessation of Lesser prairie chicken studies in 
the year 2001. The purpose of the closure is to restrict currently open 
public access into important Lesser prairie chicken habitat targeted 
for long-term ecological studies. Specifically, to prevent disturbance 
to prairie chicken booming grounds (leks) and trapping efforts at the 
grounds for

[[Page 8263]]

radio-telemetry work conducted to determine movement and habitat use. 
Unrestricted access to the area may compromise or jeopardize prairie 
chicken research efforts in this portion of the Caprock Wildlife 
Habitat Area.
    Vehicle access for administrative purposes, and those activities 
authorized by the BLM, will continue to be allowed. Only the road and 
general area serviced by the road is affected by this action.

    Dated: February 12, 1997.
Edwin L. Roberson,
Acting District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-4392 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-VA-M
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------

TRANS STATES AIRLINES, LLC -----------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On July 18, 2013, Trans States Airlines, LLC (“Trans States”), a U.S. certificated air 

carrier,1 requested that the Department register the trade name “American Eagle” for use 

in certain air transportation operations.

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier 

wishing to use an alternative trade name must first register that name with the 

Department. The rule further states that the Department may register such name after the 

air carrier gives notification to similarly named air carriers of the proposed use of the 

name. Part 215 also recognizes that the Department may intervene in the registration of a 

trade name should there be evidence of a significant potential for, or of actual, public 

confusion.

Trans States states that it has been authorized by American Airlines, Inc. (“American”) 

and American Eagle Airlines, Inc. to use the American Eagle trade name in conjunction 

with its code sharing relationship with American. In addition, Trans States states 

American acknowledges that any applicable disclosures of the identity of the operating 

air carrier and trade name in accordance with the provisions of Part 257 of the 

Department’s regulations (14 CFR Part 257) will be made.

Since Trans States has complied with the requirements of Part 215 and based on the facts 

here, we acknowledge the registration of the trade name “American Eagle” for use in 

Trans States’ operations, effective as of the closing of the merger between American 

Airlines, Inc. and US Airways, Inc. (“Effective Date”).

This authorization is effective for one year from the Effective Date, and is conditioned on 

Trans States’ agreement that, prior to the expiration of the one year term, it will confer 

with the Department to discuss whether there is any public confusion in connection with 

 

1 Trans States’ interstate certificate was last reissued by Order 98-7-6, on July 8, 1998.
2

the use of the trade name of “American Eagle” by one of the American Eagle carriers and 

whether an extension of the authorization is needed or warranted.

Dated at Washington, D.C., November 27, 2013.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov
Attachment A 

SERVICE LIST FOR TRANS STATES AIRLINES, LLC

 MS. LISA A. HARIG

 MR. DAVID J. A. HAYES, III

 COUNSEL FOR TRANS STATES AIRLINES ,LLC

 MCBREEN & KOPKO

 1501 LEE HIGHWAY 

 SUITE 180

 ARLINGTON VA 22209

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E-36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

 MR DANIEL R DAVIS POI

 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

MR MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGER

FAA AFS-900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR PETER LYNCH 

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ENFORCEMENT 

FAA/AGC-300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Di Giorgio Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Richard B.
Neff, as Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  and Lawrence S. Grossman,  as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  each hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard B. Neff
-----------------------------
Richard B. Neff
Chief Executive Officer
September 14, 2004


/s/ Lawrence S. Grossman
--------------------------
Lawrence S. Grossman
Chief Financial Officer
September 14, 2004


This   certification   accompanies   this  Report  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").

Such  certification  will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except
to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Guthen WEST v. Etta Kate PERKINS.

No. 47471.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 1, 1974.

Rogers & Morris, Eugene L. Fair, Jr., Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Paul G. Swartzfager, Jon A. Swartzfager, Laurel, for appellee.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, SMITH and SUGG, JJ-

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jones County; James D. Hester, Chancellor.

Affirmed.