alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1995
<CASH>                                           6,614
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,373
<INVENTORY>                                     90,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               193,638
<PP&E>                                         270,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,814
<BONDS>                                        242,861
<COMMON>                                           140
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           19,112
<PREFERRED>                                    254,215
<OTHER-SE>                                   (119,082)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,131
<SALES>                                        132,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,532
<CGS>                                           98,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                       779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                394
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       394
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
In the Matter of 

McWANE, INC., 

a corporation, and 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

DOCKET NO. 9351 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

a limited partnership, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF 

NON-PARTY SIGMA CORPORATON FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

On March 6, 2012, non-party Sigma Corporation ("Sigma") filed an unopposed motion to 

extend the time for Sigma to move to limit or quash the Subpoena Duces Tecum served on it on 

February 23,2012 by Complaint Counsel ("Subpoena"). Sigma states that under the applicable 

procedures ofthe Federal Trade Commission Rules of Practice, the deadline to file a Motion to 

Limit or Quash Complaint Counsel's Subpoena is March 7,2012. Sigma seeks an order 

extending this deadline to March 9, 2012. 

In support of its motion, Sigma states that it has conferred with Complaint Counsel 

regarding the scope of the Subpoena, and that Complaint Counsel does not oppose the extension 

oftime for Sigma to file a Motion to Limit or Quash the Subpoena through March 9, 2012, while 

the parties negotiate in good faith the limitations of the Subpoena. 

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. It 

is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for non-party Sigma Corporation to file any motion to 

limit or quash Complaint Counsel's Subpoena shall be March 9, 2012. 

ORDERED: 

Date: March 7, 2012 

03 07 2012
 03 07 2012
No. 10469.

#### The City of Painesville *v.*Church.

Decided April 14, 1908.

Error to Cir*410cuit Court of Lake county.

*Mr. Martin A. Tuttle,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Homer Harper,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Shepherd & Shepherd*and *Mr. Harry E. Hammar,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05979**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05979\05979_Checklist_102110_version34.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05979\05979_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05979\05979_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05979\05979_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05979\05979_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05979\05979_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05979\05979_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05979\05979_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05979\05979_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05979\Certification Statement_05979.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 05979\Supporting Documentation\05979_PP_A5-2 Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05979\Supporting Documentation\PP_A5-3_water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4139]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


State Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Grantees Meeting

    The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following 
meeting.
NAME: Meeting of State Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Grantees.

TIMES AND DATES: 12 p.m.-4:10 p.m., February 24, 1997. 8:30 a.m.-5:30 
p.m., February 25, 1997. 8 a.m.-5:10 p.m., February 26, 1997. 8:30 
a.m.-11:40 a.m., February 27, 1997.

PLACE: Holiday Inn Select-Atlanta-Decatur Hotel and Conference Plaza, 
130 Clairemont Avenue, Decatur, Georgia 30030, telephone 404/371-0204.

STATUS: Open to the public, limited only by space available. The 
meeting room accommodates approximately 80 people.

PURPOSE: This meeting will provide a forum for childhood lead poisoning 
prevention coordinators and data administrators to review program 
progress and discuss prevention issues and concerns. Persons wishing to 
make written or oral comments at the meeting should notify the contact 
person listed below, in writing or by phone, no later than close of 
business February 21, 1997.
    Requests to make oral comments should contain the name, address, 
telephone number, and organizational affiliation of the presenter. 
Depending on the time available and the number of requests to make oral 
comments, it may be necessary to limit the time of each presenter.

MATTERS TO BE DISCUSSED: Topics to be discussed at this meeting include 
CDC's proposed revised screening guidelines, establishment of a data 
system to implement screening guidance, and data recommendations. There 
will be information presented regarding computer programming and how it 
relates to data analysis and using data to make decisions. Agenda items 
are subject to change as priorities dictate.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Claudette Grant, Lead Poisoning 
Prevention Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health 
Effects, NCEH, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, M/S F42, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341, telephone 770/488-7330, fax 770/488-7335.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Joseph E. Salter,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-4139 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**





**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**





**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10- QSB for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent
      C. Buckman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







*Dated:
                April 13, 2007**/s/
                Vincent C. Buckman**Vincent
                C. Buckman*President
                and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-136-005]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC 
Gas Tariff

February 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 7, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG) tendered for filing its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised Volume 
No. 1, Eleventh Revised sheet No. 6 and Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 
6A. The proposed effective date of these tariff sheets is March 1, 
1997.
    On November 27, 1997, WNG filed a Stipulation and Agreement 
(Agreement) in Docket No. RP95-136, which, among other things, 
partially resolves WNG's cost of service, overall throughout level and 
mix of throughput for Docket No. RP95-136 rate period commencing August 
1, 1995. Article IV of the Agreement provides that, in order to 
implement the settlement rates as early as practical, WNG will file to 
request Commission authority to place the settlement rates in effect 
and to make refunds down to the settlement rates as of the first day of 
the first month following at least 30 days after the Agreement is 
certified to the Commission (i.e. to be effective March 1, 1997). WNG 
also agreed to include as part of such filing a request to make 
effective as of the same date ``ITS revenue credits'' as provided in 
Article V, Section B of the Agreement. Consistent with, and subject to, 
Articles IV and VII of the Agreement, the instant filing proposes to 
implement, subject to certain conditions, the settlement rates 
effective March 1, 1997.
    WNG states that a copy of its filing was served on all participants 
listed on the Commission's official service list in this docket, as 
well as on all jurisdictional customers and interested State 
Commissions.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make Protestants 
Parties to the proceedings. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3978 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Nicholas Robert ANGELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-39.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 2, 1971.

Matthews, Mandina & Lipsky, Coconut Grove, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William L. Rogers, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Angelí, appeals from his conviction of unlawful possession and sale of heroin after a jury trial.

Prior to trial Angelí moved, under Rule 1.220(e) CrPR, 33 F.S.A., for the exchange of a list of all witnesses known to the parties. The state, through inadvertence, failed to comply with the aforesaid rule. After the jury had been selected and witnesses sworn defendant moved to exclude all the state’s witnesses because of its. failure to comply with the aforesaid rule. The court denied the motion as being untimely and defendant argues, on appeal, that this was reversible error.

Ramirez v. State, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 744, held that even though it is mandatory for the prosecuting attorney to comply with this rule after it has been invoked by the defendant, the trial judge still has discretion which he could properly exercise after making an adequate inquiry into all the surrounding circumstances.

Here, the trial judge failed to make any adequate inquiry into all of the surrounding circumstances in the case, and simply denied the motion for a mistrial as untimely. An adequate inquiry into all the surrounding circumstances may have demonstrated that some of the state’s witnesses were not known to the defendants. The names of certain witnesses may have been available to defendant through the exchange of a list of witnesses and he may *28have been prejudiced by the failure of the state to furnish him with a list of the witnesses in accordance with the rules. Under the authority of Ramirez, supra, we must reverse.

Angelí has argued several other points on appeal which have been examined and have been found lacking in sufficient merit to warrant reversal. The orders appealed from are, therefore, reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,923,693
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  399,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,248,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,667,401
<PP&E>                                       1,166,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                 584,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,067,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          886,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       247,968
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,231,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,067,121
<SALES>                                      3,300,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,442,599
<CGS>                                        1,384,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,384,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,734,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (676,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (676,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (676,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20580

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 

proceeding the appearance of

□ counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES)

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding,

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being filed.

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission

Room H-113

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

McWANE, INC., et.al.

Elizabeth R. Sheyn (Attorney)

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

300 North LaSalle

Chicago, IL 60654

Phone: 312-862-2000

Fax Number: 312-862-2200

(Elizabeth R. Sheyn) D09351 7/27/2012

Griffin Pipe Products (Non-Party)

1011 Warrenville Road

Lisle, IL 60532

Phone: 630-719-6500

07 27 2012
#### PAUL M. DAVISON PETROLEUM PRODUCTS v. L. T. BROWN, CONTRACTOR, INC., et al.

No. 62169.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Parish of Webster. 356 So.2d 572.

Writ denied.
ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMRICA 

BEFORE THE FEDERA TRE COMMSSION 

) In the Matter of ) 

) Docket No. 9327 

Polypore International, Inc. ) Public Version 

a corporation. ) 

) 

COMPLAI COUNSEL'S WITHRAWAL OF ITS 

CROSS MOTION TO COMPEL TESTIONY OF PHIIP
 

BRYSON AN RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO 

AMND ORDER SETING HEARG SCHEDULE
 

Upon consideraon of the mlg and gudance of the Cour on Complaint
 

Counsl's Motion to Compel and Respondents representation that they will not cal Mr. 

Bryson and that others can testfy as to what he said, we withdraw Mr. Bryson as a 

witness and will thus have no need to depose hi.
 

Moreover, upon consideration of the Cour's mlg and guidance on our Motion to
 

Compel, we will not oppose a heang on the 9th; although we could also be avaiable on 

the 3rd if tht is more convenient for the Cour. 

October 23,2009 Respectfly submitted, 

~\d:\ . ~..~~'.~..

J. Robert Robertn 

Complait Counsel
 

Bureau of Competition 

Federal Trade Commssion 

600 Pennlvana Avenue, N.W.
 

Washigton, DC 20580
 

Telephone: (202) 326-2008 

Facsime: (202) 326-2884
 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on October 23,2009, I filed via hand and electronic mail 

delivery an original and two copies of 
 the foregoing Complaint Counsel's Withdrawal of 

its Cross Motion to Compel Testimony of 
 Philip Bryson and Response to Respondent's 

Motion to Amend Order Setting Hearing Schedule with: 

Donald S. Clark, Secretar 

Office of the Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Rm. H-159 

Washington, DC 20580 

I hereby certify that on October 23, 2009, I filed via hand and electronic mail 

delivery two copies of the foregoing Complaint Counsel's Withdrawal of its Cross 

Motion to Compel Testimony of 
 Philip Bryson and Response to Respondent's Motion to 

Amend Order Setting Hearng Schedule with: 

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20580 

oali~ftc.gov 

I hereby certify that on October 23,2009, I filed via electronic and first class mail 

delivery a copy ofthe foregoing Complaint Counsel's Withdrawal of its Cross Motion to 

Compel Testimony of 
 Philip Bryson and Response to Respondent's Motion to Amend 

Order Setting Hearng Schedule with: 

Wiliam L. Rikard, Jr., Esq. 

Eric D. Welsh, Esq. 

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP 

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000 

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 

williamrikard~parkerpoe.com 

eiicwelsh~parkerpoe.com 

By: ~/! ~


Steplien Antonio 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvana Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20580 

Telephone: (202) 326-2536 

santonio~ftc. gov 

-- - _.--_.....
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 33-94546, 333-07195, 33-94544, 333-07199, 333-52589, 333-62781, 333-52593, 333-77883, 333-87882 and 333-87880) pertaining to the Sypris Solutions, Inc. 1994Stock Option Plan for Key Employees and to the Sypris Solutions, Inc. Independent Directors’ Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-114982) pertaining to the Sypris Solutions, Inc. 2004 Equity Plan, of ourreports dated March 23, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sypris Solutions, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Sypris Solutions, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Louisville, Kentucky 

March 23, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERfcA ....

FEDERAL TRADE COMMJSSION",~ . .

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGËS' .

ORIGINAL.

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD.,

a limited parnership,

Respondents.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

In the Matter of

McWANE, INC.,

a corporation, and DOCKET NO. 9351

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION OF

DANA KEPNER COMPANY, INC. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

On March 27,2012, Dana Kepner Company, Inc. ("Dana Kepner") filed an unopposed

motion to extend the time for Dana Kepner to move to limit or quash the Subpoena Duces Tecum

("Subpoena") served on it on March 16,2012 by Complaint CounseL. Dana Kepner is requesting

an order extending its deadline to file a Motion to Limit or Quash Complaint Counsel's

Subpoena to April 3, 2012.

In support of its motion, Dana Kepner states that it is in the process of conferring with

Complaint Counsel about the Subpoena, and that Complaint Counsel does not oppose the

extension of time for Dana Kepner to fie a Motion to Limit or Quash the Subpoena through

April 3, 2012 while the paries negotiate in good faith the scope of the Subpoena.

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. It

is hereby ORDERED that the deadline for Dana Kepner to fie any motion to limit or quash the

Subpoena shall be April 3, 2012.

ORDERED:

D. Michael Chappell "-

~Vv~

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Date: March 28,2012