alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549


                            FORM 8-K
                         CURRENT REPORT
                Pursuant to Section 13 and 15(d)
             of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                          July 3, 1997
        Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)


                   SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
      Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


     Delaware                       0-18048             75-2258519
(State or Other Jurisdiction       (Commission         (IRS Employer
of Incorporation)                  File Number)      Identification No.)


1600 Promenade Center, 15th Floor
       Richardson, TX                                    75080
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)               (Zip Code)


                         (972) 690-5888
      (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)


                    _________________________
  (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

<PAGE>

ITEM 5.   OTHER EVENTS.

     SA Telecommunications, Inc. issued the press release which is
attached as Exhibit 20.1 hereto on July 3, 1997, which press
release is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PRO FORMA FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND
          EXHIBITS.

     (c)  Exhibits.

          Exhibit No.    Document Description

          20.1*          Press Release of SA Telecommunications
                         dated July 3, 1997
          
___________
*Filed herewith

                            SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                   SA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.

DATE:     July 7, 1997             BY:  /s/ J. David Darnell
                                        -------------------------
                                        J. David Darnell
                                        Vice President-Finance and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>

                          EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.         DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

20.1*               Press Release of SA Telecommunications, Inc.
                    dated July 3, 1997




-----------
*Filed herewith
**Exhibit 31.1**I, J. Anthony Kouba, a member of the Board of Directors and Principal Executive Officer of theCompany, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Worldwide, Inc. (the “registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: March 30, 2007 /s/ J. Anthony Kouba         J. Anthony Kouba
#### Frances Sharon JAYNE, formerly Frances Sharon Dennison, Appellant, v. Calvin B. DENNISON, Appellee.

No. 73-15.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 14, 1973.

*238J. Thomas Wright, of Herce, Martinez & Associate, Tampa, for appellant.

Donald C. Evans and J. Ronald Wiggin-ton, Tampa, for appellee.

• COWART, JOE A., Jr., Associate Judge.

The appellant claims that every order changing custody must include a finding that the prior custodian is unfit. This is not correct. There need only be a substantial, material change of circumstances that strongly infers a change of custody would .promote the welfare of the child. Negative factors in the mother’s circumstances, short of unfitness, when coupled with intervening special needs of the child and increased ability of the father to provide for the child may be sufficient to justify a change. While unfitness is entitled to much weight, and is a factor often noted in the cases, it is not an absolute prerequisite to a change.

The appealed order is Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7262 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7262

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified 
    opportunity funds to invest in community development financial 
                             institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2020

 Mr. Meeks (for himself, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Green of Texas, 
  Mr. Cardenas, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Gallego, and Mr. Crist) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow qualified 
    opportunity funds to invest in community development financial 
                             institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Development in Opportunity 
Zones Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. QUALIFIED OPPORTUNITY FUND INVESTMENTS IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 
              FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1400Z-2(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Special rule for community development 
                financial institutions.--The term `qualified 
                opportunity zone business' shall include any community 
                development financial institution (as defined in 
                section 103 of the Community Development Banking and 
                Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4702)) 
                if, during substantially all the qualified opportunity 
                fund's holding period for its investment in such 
                community development financial institution, the 
                average of the aggregate amount of investment, and 
                principal amount of loans, provided by such community 
                development financial institution to qualified 
                opportunity zone businesses (other than community 
                development financial institutions) or residents of 
                qualified opportunity zones is not less than such 
                investment.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of The Female Health Company (the "Company") certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  December 3, 2010


/s/ O.B. Parrish


O. B. Parrish


Chief Executive Officer








Dated:  December 3, 2010


/s/ Donna Felch


Donna Felch


Chief Financial Officer





This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company (the "Company") for the
quarter ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregg Engles, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


                                                    /s/ Gregg Engles
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    Gregg Engles
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    Date: November 14, 2002


Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the
      extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### John Patrick HOBAN and General Motors Acceptance Corporation, a New York corporation, Appellants, v. Gerlando CONSTANTINO, Appellee.

No. 70-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 20, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1970.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Da-vant, Miami, and James H. Gray, for appellants.

Arthur Newman, and Horton & Schwartz, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sharpsteen v. Keesler, Fla.App.1965, 178 So.2d 623; Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 85; Eicholz v. Frey, Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 771; and Rule 1.470(b), R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.
#### SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Odom J. MECHE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3018.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 12, 1970.

Davidson, Meaux, Onebane & Donohoe, by Richard C. Meaux, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellant.

Mouton, Champagne & Colomb, by Wel-ton P. Mouton, Sr., Lafayette, for defendants-appellees.

Before TATE, CULPEPPER and MILLER, JJ.

MILLER, Judge.

Plaintiff appealed devolutively from the trial court’s refusal to allow the filing of a supplemental petition. Although defendant has not objected to our reviewing the merits of the complex issue considered by the trial court, we notice the fact that there is no right of appeal, and we dismiss it. LSA-C.C.P. art. 2162.

The right to appeal such a ruling was considered by our Presiding Judge in his article Amendment of Pleadings in Louisiana, 43 Tul.L.R. 211 at 216:

> “The trial court’s allowance of, or refusal to allow, an amendment is regarded as a non-appealable interlocutory ruling. Mercadel v. Mercadel, 179 La. 895, 155 So. 391 (1934); Mechanics’ & Traders’ Ins. Co. v. Gerson, 38 La.Ann. 349 (1886); Geordano v. Thomas, 13 La. 315 (1839); Penrice v. Crothwaite, 11 Mart. (o. s.) 537 (1822). Under the unusual and rare circumstances which justify exercise of supervisory writs, (Tate, Supervisory Powers of the Louisiana Courts of Appeal, 38 Tul.L.Rev. 429 [1964]) an appellate court may order immediate review of a prejudicial abuse of the trial court’s discretion. Hayes v. Muller, 248 La. 934, 183 So.2d 310 (1966).”

Since there is no right of appeal, the appeal is dismissed at the costs of plaintiff appellant.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Eugene WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1061.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 5, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from First Church
Financing Corporation financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,180,944<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F2>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,596,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F2>
<BONDS>                                      5,046,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     446,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,596,785
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               862,740
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               192,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             617,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,045
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,045
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Mortgage loans net of purchase discount
<F2>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 10637.

#### Millen *v.*Bush et al.

Decided May 26, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. John J. Sullivan*and *Mr. Homer E. Stewart,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Beardsley & Morgan,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Si-iauci-c, Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
#### SUNCOAST FRUIT COMPANY and Sunshine Packers, Incorporated, Appellants, v. Robert H. HULL et al., Appellees.

No. 73-528.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 31, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Martin County; C. Pfeiffer Trowbridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 14, 2006 Before Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge
No. 03-4218 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee , v. ADDO WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. No. 03 CR 29 Charles N. Clevert, Jr., Judge

. O R D E R This court ordered a limited remand so the district court could state on the record whether the sentence remains appropriate now that United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), has limited the guidelines to advisory status. See United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005). The district judge has now replied that he would today impose the same sentence, knowing of the guidelines’ advisory status. The range under the guidelines is 84 to 105 months, and Williams’ sentence of 96 months is slightly above the midpoint. The defendant did not respond to our invitation to file an UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53No. 03-4218 Page 2 argument concerning the appropriate disposition of the appeal in light of the district court’s response. We do not see any reason why Williams’ sentence would be deemed “unreasonable” in post- Booker practice. The judgment of the district court therefore is A FFIRMED .
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Eva RAMIREZ and Jesus Torres, Appellees.

No. 77-1208.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 1978.

Janet Reno, State’s Atty. and George Volsky and Dennis L. Curran, Asst. State’s Attys. and Howard Blumberg, Legal Intern, for appellant.

*920Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for Eva Ramirez.

Stephen J. Bronis, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for Jesus Torres.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order entered pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.190, reducing the charges against the appellees from murder in the first degree to murder in the second degree. The order is affirmed upon authority of *State v. Dixon,*283 So.2d 1 (Fla.1973).

Affirmed.
<page>                                      EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Diversified
Futures Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.


By: /s/ Christian Angstadt

Name: 	 Christian Angstadt
Title:	 Chief Financial Officer

Date:	 March 28, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.61

                           Nexell Therapeutics Inc.
                                   9 Parker
                           Irvine, California 92618


                                                        As of May 25, 1999
Mr. Donald G. Drapkin
c/o MacAndrews & Forbes
35 East 62nd Street
New York, NY

Re:  Amendment to November 17, 1995 Stock Option Agreement
     -----------------------------------------------------

Dear Mr. Drapkin:

     This letter constitutes an amendment to the Stock Option Agreement dated as
of November 17, 1995 (the "Option Agreement") between you and Nexell
Therapeutics Inc. (formerly named VIMRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.) as follows:

     In consideration of your willingness to extend your consulting services for
a period of three years, the parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the
expiration date of the "Option" (as each of those terms is defined in the Option
Agreement) is extended from November 16, 2000 to November 16, 2003, subject to
approval by the Company's shareholders as required by rules of The NASDAQ Stock
Market, Inc.  In addition, you shall be entitled to a "cashless exercise"
provision consistent with the cashless exercise provision authorized under the
Company's 1997 Incentive and Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan.

     Except as expressly set forth herein, the Option Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

     Please sign below in the space provided to signify your consent to the
foregoing amendment.

                                Very truly yours,

                                NEXELL THERAPEUTICS INC.

                                By:  /s/ Richard L. Dunning
                                     ----------------------
                                     Richard L. Dunning
                                     Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                     Executive Officer

I hereby acknowledge and agree to the foregoing amendment.

/s/ Donald G. Drapkin
-------------------------
Donald G. Drapkin