alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 10162.

#### Moree, Admr., *v.*Andrews, Exr.

Decided February 25, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Knox county.

*Mr. C. E. Critchñeld*and *Mr. I. B. Graham,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. FI. H. & R. M. Greer*and *Mr. Columbus Ewalt,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed on authority of *Richey, Exr., et al.*v. *Johnson et al.,*30 Ohio St., 288, and *Renner et al.*v. *Williams,*71 Ohio St., 340.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, ORLANDO LODGE NO. 25, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 43188.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 2, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 269 So.2d 402.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ„ concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
     Agrilink  Foods,  Inc.,  Form 10-Q, for the period ended September 23, 2000
     and is qualified in it entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                       0000026285
<NAME>                      Agrilink Foods, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-23-2000
<CASH>                                             6,268
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    137,915
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      388,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 570,022
<PP&E>                                           428,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                   116,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,196,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            312,842
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       181,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,196,166
<SALES>                                          285,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 285,018
<CGS>                                            202,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    202,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  63,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                19,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       36
<INCOME-TAX>                                          14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   22
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                          22
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0


</TABLE>
#### Richard C. COLE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 17, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Osceola County; Roger A. Barker, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Greg Mays, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Worldwide, Inc. (the “registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: March 30, 2007 /s/ Greg Mays         Greg Mays
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Calvin DUMAS.

No. 61955.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Calvin Dumas, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Morehouse.

Writ denied.

DIXON, CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant writ and order a hearing.
Treasury approves Tennessee’s plan to invest $20 million of CPF funding in 

multi-purpose community facilities to improve resources for communities 

that enable work, education, and health monitoring.

Capital Projects Fund Award Fact Sheet

Tennessee

 

▪ Program Summary: $20 million for Multi-Purpose Community Facilities (9% of CPF

allocation)

▪ Program Description: Tennessee’s Connected

Community Facilities grant program provides funding

for rural and urban communities to construct or

improve facilities that provide public internet access.

Each facility will partner with the Tennessee

Department of Economic and Community 

Development (TNECD) to offer programming, resources, and technical assistance 

for workforce development programs, business development, educational courses, 

as well as health clinics and services in coordination with the Tennessee 

Department of Health.

▪ Key State Contact: Tennessee Department of Economic and Community

Development

Tennessee's Capital Projects Fund Program Overview

For More Information: 

For Media Inquiries: 

For General Inquiries:

Please visit www.treasury.gov/CPF

Please contact the U.S. Treasury Press Office at (202) 622-2960

Please email CapitalProjectsFund@treasury.gov for additional information

Tennessee estimates 

this funding will serve 

more than 7 

communities with new 

or rehabilitated facilities 

that will impact at least 

10,000 Tennesseans.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
     the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
     Enzo J. Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
     to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.












     /S/ ENZO J. VIALARDI
     ------------------------
     Enzo J. Vialardi
     Chief Financial Officer
     May 7, 2004



<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Cascade Microtech, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Sipowicz,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge,:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Steven Sipowicz     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Steven  Sipowicz         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
| Cascade  Microtech, Inc. |
| March  29, 2005          |

 

This certification ismade solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any otherpurpose.  A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CascadeMicrotech, Inc. andwill be retained by Cascade Microtech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. (S) 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Environmental Elements
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lawrence Rychlak, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



         Date: June 27, 2003           /s/  Lawrence Rychlak

                                       Lawrence Rychlak
                                       Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
                                       Officer
10.1 - CHS Amendment






AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
DISTILLER'S GRAIN MARKETING AGREEMENT


This Amendment No. to the Distiller's Grain Marketing Agreement (this "Amendment") is made effective as of February 13, 2014 (the "Amendment Effective Date") by and between Highwater Ethanol LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Seller"), and CHS Inc., a Minnesota cooperative corporation ("Buyer").


Reference is made to that certain Distiller's Grain Marketing Agreement, dated October 1 , 2007 (the "Marketing Agreement"), by and between Seller and Buyer.


1.    Agreement to Amend the Marketing Agreement. Seller and Buyer hereby agree to amend the Marketing Agreement as set forth below in Section 2 of this Amendment. This Amendment constitutes an amendment to the Marketing Agreement in accordance with Section 18.E of the Marketing Agreement. Except as expressly amended pursuant to this Amendment, all terms set forth in the Marketing Agreement shall continue in Rill force and effect. All capitalized terms used in this Amendment but not defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning given to such term in the Marketing Agreement.


2.    Amendment to Marketing Agreement. Seller and Buyer agreed to adjust the per ton margin cap to $2.00. Accordingly, Seller and Buyer hereby amend the Marketing Agreement by amending and restating the second sentence of Section 6.A of the Marketing Agreement to read as follows:


In no event shall the fee to Buyer for DDGS and WDB be less than $1.50 per ton or more than $2.00 per ton.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Buyer have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the Amendment Effective Date.


	
		
	 
	CHS Inc.

	 
	 

	 
	By: /s/ Steve Markham

	 
	Name: Steve Markham

	 
	Its: Merchant

	 
	 

	 
	Highwater Ethanol, LLC

	 
	 

	 
	By: /s/ Brian Kletscher

	 
	Name: Brian Kletscher

	 
	Its: CEO
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Dora DIODATI, a/k/a Doris Drew, Material Witness. Doris Drew, Appellant.

No. 73-48.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 4, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF  THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I,
Steven S. Skalicky, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)
and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



/s/ STEVEN S. SKALICKY Steven S. Skalicky Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:
February 24, 2010

---



QuickLinks
September 25, 2015

Friedrich A. Kattermann

135 Schaeffer Drive

Ronkonkoma, NY 11779

Dear Mr. Kattermann:

This letter responds to your petition for exemption dated June 3, 2015, requesting an 

exemption from Title 14 of The Code of Federal Regulations, §91.881, for your Morane 

Saulnier MS-760 airplane. Your request was docketed as No. FAA-2015-3235. Section 

91.881 requires that after December 31, 2015, jet airplanes with a maximum takeoff weight 

of 75,000 pounds or less must meet Stage 3 noise requirements to operate in the contiguous 

United States. 

Section 506 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) prohibits the 

operation of jets weighing 75,000 pounds or less that do not meet Stage 3. The FMRA also 

allows for the limited operation of prohibited jets for certain purposes. These provisions are 

listed in the codified statute at 49 USC 47534, and were adopted in 14 CFR at §§91.881 and 

91.883.

The FAA is unable to grant your request for exemption from §91.881 because we have no 

authority to do so. The statute did not grant the FAA any authority to make exceptions to the 

prohibition other than as specified for limited special flight authorizations for specified 

purposes identified in the law.

You noted that your aircraft was excluded from the FAA’s rulemaking that adopted this 

statutory change. Since the FAA was given no authority to change the statute, our analysis 

conducted at the time was not required by law and was not meant to be comprehensive. It 

was designed to give interested persons and affected operators a sense of the range of aircraft 

subject to the statutory prohibition and the anticipated economic impact for some of the more 

common models in operation. 

 
2

Accordingly, we are taking no further action on your request and the docket for this request is

being closed. 

Sincerely,

//s//

Lourdes Maurice

Director, Environment and Energy
No. 00-6354.

#### Gonzalez Lora *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).
No. 10477.

#### Loveland et al. *v.*Swoveland.

Decided April 14, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Van Wert county.

*Mr. H. C. Glenn,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. C. S. Mauk,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Si-iauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2007 of CrownCrafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 15, 2007                                                                        /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut   Chairman of the Board, President & Chief
Mr. William T. Wisniewski

Acting Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III

1650 Arch Street (Mail Code: 3RAOO)

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Wisniewski:

Enclosed for your approval is a revision to Pennsylvania’s State Implementation Plan

(SIP) concerning amendments to the Pennsylvania Consumer Products and Architectural and

Industrial Maintenance Coatings Regulations. The submittal includes three copies of a final

rulemaking that amends 25 Pa. Code Chapter 130, Subchapters B and C (relating to consumer

products; and architectural and industrial maintenance coatings) The amendments to Subchapter

B amend the Table of Standards to add volatile organic compound (VOC) content limits for an

additional 11 categories of consumer products and revise the VOC content limits for one

category of consumer products currently regulated. The amendments to Subchapter B also

include definitions for approximately 30 new terms, including terms that relate to the new

regulated product categories, and revised definitions for approximately 75 existing terms to

provide clarity. The amendments add the term “VOC-volatile organic compound” to Subchapter

B and revise the definition ofthe term in Subchapter C to mirror the definition ofthe term in

25 Pa. Code § 121.1 (relating to definitions). The definition ofthe term “VOC-volatile organic

compound” in § 121.1 refers to the Federal definition of VOC.

This SIP revision submission includes the final rulemaking published in the Pennsylvania

Bulletin on October 11, 2008 (38 Pa.B. 5598), documentation ofthe public participation process

including proof ofpublic notice and the Department’s comment and response document..,

Should you have any questions regarding this SIP revision, please contact Joyce E. Epps,

Director, Bureau of Air Quality, by e-mail at jeepps@state.pa.us or by telephone at

717-787-9702.

Sin erely,

Acting Secretary

Enclosure

An Equal Opportunity Employer www.dep.state.pa.us Printed on Recycled Paper
Th

)