alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4699]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act. Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted 
throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 21, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521:
    1. Patriot Bank Corp, Pottstown, Pennsylvania; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Patriot Bank, Pottstown, Pennsylvania.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Coal City Corporation, Chicago, Illinois; and Manufacturers 
National Corporation, Chicago, Illinois, to acquire U.S. Bancorp, Inc., 
Lansing, Illinois, and thereby acquire U.S. Bank, Lansing, Illinois.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Randall C. Sumner, Vice 
President) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63102-2034:
    1. Community Financial Corp., Olney, Illinois; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of American Bancshares, Inc., Highland, 
Illinois; and thereby indirectly acquire American Bank of Illinois in 
Highland, Highland, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 20, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-4699 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9001]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Northeast Utilities; Notice of Document Availability and Public 
Meeting

    On January 31, 1997, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 
received from Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO), the licensee 
for the Millstone Nuclear Power Station, its comprehensive plan for 
resolving employee safety concerns. The plan is in response to an NRC 
Order. On October 24, 1996, the Director of the Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation sent an Order to NNECO requiring: (1) A 
comprehensive plan for resolving the Millstone station employees' 
safety concerns; and (2) an independent third-party oversight of 
NNECO's implementation of this plan. Copies of NNECO's Comprehensive 
Plan pertaining to the employee safety concerns program are available 
at the Waterford Public Library, ATTN: Mr. Vincent Juliano, 49 Rope 
Ferry Road, Waterford, Connecticut, and the Learning Resources Center, 
Three Rivers Community-Technical College, 574 New London Turnpike, 
Norwich, Connecticut.
    The NRC will hold a public meeting regarding the comprehensive plan 
for resolving the Millstone station employees' safety concerns. The 
meeting will be held in the near future at the Waterford Town Hall in 
Waterford, Connecticut. The meeting will be open to public attendance 
and will be transcribed. The NRC has elected to hold such a public 
meeting because of the public's interest.
    The structure of the public meeting shall be as follows:

NRC opening remarks
Members of the public comments and questions
NRC closing remarks
Meeting concludes

    The purpose of this public meeting is to obtain comments from 
members of the public for NRC staff use in evaluating NNECO's 
comprehensive plan addressing employee safety concerns. The staff will 
not offer any preliminary views on its evaluation of the comprehensive 
plan. The public meeting will be chaired by a senior NRC official who 
will limit presentations to the above subject.
    A meeting notice will be issued stating the date and time of the 
meeting.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of February 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Helen N. Pastis,
Senior Project Manager, Special Projects Office--Licensing, Office of 
Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-4854 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Kenneth STEARNS, Appellant, v. CITY OF TITUSVILLE, Herbert H. Shipe and Frank G. Buckoski, Appellees.

No. 70-737.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 1971.

Charles E. Thomson and Charles M. Rieders, Cocoa Beach, for appellant.

Frank R. Pound of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Rock-ledge, for appellee City of Titusville.

John M. Starling of Crofton, Holland, & Starling, Titusville, for appellees Shipe and Buckoski.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant-plaintiff, Kenneth Stearns, appeals an order dismissing with prejudice an amended complaint against appellee-de-fendants, City of Titusville, et al. We affirm.

The record on appeal contains only the amended complaint. It is devoid of *642any factual allegations, stating only that the allegations of the original complaint (not included in the record) are re-alleged, changing a date and striking the words “fraudulently” and “fraudulent” in several places. Thus, no indication of what the original cause of action was appears from the record.

It is the responsibility and duty of an appellant to provide the appellate court with a record sufficient to review the matter assigned as error. Johnson v. Town of Eatonville, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 664. The appellant in the instant case has not favored this court with a sufficient record to review the matter assigned as error.

Accordingly, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
#### Ronald BARMORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 4, 1973.

Virgil Q. Mayo, Public Defender, and Raymond L. Syfrett, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

*159Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A. S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1







                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles J. Hinkaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ CHARLES J. HINKATY
----------------------
Charles J. Hinkaty
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2007
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the quarterly report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
Zorko, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











By:
                /s/
      Mark A. ZorkoName:
                Mark
      A ZorkoTitle:
                Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
                March
      17, 2009











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
March 13, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington DC 20590

Re: Supporting information for Lewanui UAS exemption Dear Sir or Madam: In light of the new proposed regulations that are currently under review, I'd like to add some information to support my request for exemption. I would like to specify that I am not just a UAS / model aircraft enthusiast. I am a United States Navy Veteran and I currently hold an Airline Transportation Pilot Certificate for Rotorcraft-Helicopters and have over ten years' experience operating in the National Airspace System and I'm employed as a full time pilot. I have extensive film experience with multiple agencies; HBO, National Geographic, Motor Trend, Honda, Lexus / Toyota, just to name a few. In addition to flying manned aircraft, I possess over 20 years flying remote control and model aircraft. My experience extends well beyond UAS to radio control helicopters and fixed wing (scale, 3D aerobatic, slope soaring). If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact the undersigned at 808.557.1988 or tjlerma@gmail.com

. Sincerely yours,

~ Timothy Lerma Lewa n u i

1629 Mona Loop, Hilo, HI 96720 T: 808.557.1988 E: tjlerma@gmail.com
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4179]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB-55 (Sub-No. 536X)]


CSX Transportation, Inc.--Abandonment Exemption--in Vigo County, 
IN

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempts CSX 
Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), from the prior approval requirements of 49 
U.S.C. 10903 to permit CSXT to abandon a 2.6-mile portion of its 
Chicago Service Lane, CE&D Subdivision, known at the Saxton Branch, 
between milepost ZY-0.00, at Dewey, IN (near Terre Haute), and milepost 
ZY-2.6, at the end of the track, in Vigo County, IN, subject to an 
environmental condition and standard employee protective conditions.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file an offer of 
financial assistance (OFA) has been received, this exemption will be 
effective on March 24, 1997. Formal expressions of intent to file an 
OFA under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) must be filed by March 3, 1997, 
petitions to stay must be filed by March 7, 1997, requests for a public 
use condition conforming to 49 CFR 1152.28(a)(2) must be filed by March 
12, 1997, and petitions to reopen must be filed by March 17, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings, referring to STB Docket No. AB-55 (Sub-No. 
536X) to: (1) Surface Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, 
Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 
20423; and (2) Charles M. Rosenberger, 500 Water Street--J150, 
Jacksonville, FL 32202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beryl Gordon, (202) 927-5660. [TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-
5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: February 13, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4179 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7151 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7151

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
with respect to future interstate designations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2020

 Mr. Arrington (for himself, Mr. Cuellar, Ms. Granger, Mr. Thornberry, 
and Mr. Lujan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
with respect to future interstate designations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ports-to-Plains Highway Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. FUTURE INTERSTATE DESIGNATION AND OPERATION.

    (a) Inclusion of Certain Route Segments on Interstate System.--
Section 1105(e)(5) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 
Act of 1991 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by inserting ``subsection (c)(14)(A)(ii) 
                (relating solely to the portion from Limon to I-76 in 
                the vicinity of Brush),'' after ``subsection 
                (c)(13),''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``subsection (c)(38),'' after 
                ``subsection (c)(37),''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)(i), by adding at the end the 
        following: ``A State having jurisdiction over any segment of 
        the routes referred to in subsection (c)(14)(A)(ii) (relating 
        solely to the portion from Limon to I-76 in the vicinity of 
        Brush) or (c)(38) shall erect signs, as appropriate and 
        approved by the Secretary, identifying such segment as a future 
        addition to the Interstate System.''.
    (b) Vehicle Weight Limitations.--Section 127 of title 23, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(v) Operation of Vehicles on Certain Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, 
and New Mexico Highways.--If any segment of the routes referred to in 
section 1105(c)(14)(A)(ii) (relating solely to the portion from Limon 
to I-76 in the vicinity of Brush) or section 1105(c)(38) of the 
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 is designated 
as a route on the Interstate System, a vehicle that could operate 
legally on that segment before the date of such designation may 
continue to operate on that segment, without regard to any requirement 
under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
~ ~ ~~ lid ;~ c' 'i(j ,/ :'l :t~1!

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES

In the Matter of

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

ORDER REQUIRIG EXPEDITED RESPONSE

:,Jl tp E3' c¡

5 J. 'l: 9rf$

On October 9,2009, Respondent submitted a Motion for Leave to File

Supplemental Affidavit of Hary D. Seibert. Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.22(c),

Complaint Counsel is hereby directed to file a response to this motion by 5:00 p.m.,

October 14,2009.-

ORDERED:

Date: October 13, 2009

'1 - "' 'l - .,
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Cleon, Also Known as Cleon James, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 812]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the *555Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered September 22, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him, as a violent felony offender, to consecutive determinate terms of eight years imprisonment on each of the convictions of robbery in the first degree, and terms of one year imprisonment each on the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and on the convictions of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, to run concurrently with each other and with the terms of imprisonment imposed on the convictions of robbery in the first degree. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Demakos, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by providing that the terms of imprisonment imposed on the convictions of robbery in the first degree shall run concurrently with each other; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, his showup identification was not unduly suggestive merely because the two complainants were together *(see, People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023). Although simultaneous showup procedures are generally disfavored *(see, People v Adams,*53 NY2d 241), they are permissible when, as here, they are conducted in close spatial and temporal proximity to the commission of the crime for the purpose of securing a prompt and reliable identification *(see, People v Laing, 221*AD2d 662).

The sentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated. Bracken, P. J., Ritter, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
#### Eddie DUNCAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-38.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 25, 1970.

Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

This is another one of those cases where a prisoner, irked by his forcible detention in durance vile, seeks to exchange incarceration for emancipation by utilizing a dissenting opinion in Brown v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 55, 58. But unfortunately for appellant Eddie Duncan, Jr., the effort must again prove fruitless, upon authority of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Brown v. State, Fla.1970, 237 So.2d 129. See also this 2nd District Court’s opinions in Rogers v. State, 239 So.2d 118; Woods v. State, 239 So.2d 853; and Kinder v. State, 240 So.2d 162.

The lower Court’s order in the instant case, denying Duncan’s post-conviction motion for relief, must be and is—

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do herebycertify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending January 1, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: February 15, 2006                                           /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer
No. 10540.

#### The Union Savings Bank Co., Exr., *v.*The Western Union Telegraph Co.

Decided March 17, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Clark county.

*Mr. Charles L. Spencer*and *Mr. Edwin S. Plouck,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Martin & Martin,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Spiauck, C. J., Price and Davis, JJ., concur.