alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
            WHEREAS, DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND
III L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the ?Partnership?), DEMETER
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the ?General
Partner?), and VK CAPITAL, INC., (formerly known as Dean Witter Futures &
Currency Management Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the ?Trading Advisor?),
have agreed to amend the Management Agreement, dated as of the 12th day of
July, 1990, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Management Agreement,
dated as of the 30th day of June, 1992 (the ?Management Agreement?), among the
Partnership, the General Partner, and the Trading Advisor,
  to reduce the monthly management fee payable to the Trading Advisor
 and to increase the quarterly incentive fee payable to the Trading Advisor.
            WHEREAS, all provisions contained in the Management
Agreement remain in full force and effect and are modified only to the extent
necessary to provide for the amendments set forth below.
            NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby amend the
Management Agreement as follows:
            1.	The monthly management fee equal to 1/4 of 1% of the
?Adjusted Net Assets? of the Partnership in Section 6(a)(i) of the Management
Agreement is hereby changed to a monthly management fee equal to 1/6 of 1% of
the ?Adjusted Net Assets? of the Partnership.
            2.	The quarterly incentive fee equal to 15% of the ?Trading
Profits? in Section 6(a)(ii) of the Management Agreement is hereby changed to a
quarterly incentive fee equal to 20% of the ?Trading Profits?.
            3.	The foregoing amendments shall take effect as of the 1st
day of February, 2006.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Management
Agreement has been executed for and on behalf of the undersigned as of the 31st
day of January, 2006.
DEAN WITTER DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND III
L.P.
By:  Demeter Management Corporation,
	General Partner
        By:/s/  Jeffrey A. Rothman
Name:	Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President
DEMETER MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
By:/s/  Jeffrey A. Rothman
Name:	Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President
VK CAPITAL, INC.
By:/s/  Maureen Kaelin
Name:	Maureen Kaelin
Title:	President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL DEVON TRAPP, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-97-205) Submitted: December 28, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Devon Trapp, Appellant Pro Se. S. David Schiller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Devon Trapp seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Trapp , No. CR-97-205 (E.D. Va. Aug. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Charles J. GAUMOND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 41109.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 29, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 29, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 246 So.2d 580.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3744]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-30-000]


Kincaid Generation L.L.C.; Notice of Issuance of Order

February 11, 1997.
    Kincaid Generation L.L.C. (Kincaid) filed an application for 
authorization to sell power at market-based rates, and for certain 
waivers and authorizations. In particular, Kincaid requested that the 
Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liabilities by Kincaid. On 
January 30, 1997, the Commission issued an Order Conditionally 
Accepting For Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), in the above-
docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's January 30, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (E), (F), and (H):
    (E) Within 30 days of the date of this order, any person desiring 
to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket approval of 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by Kincaid should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214.
    (F) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (E) above, Kincaid is hereby authorized, pursuant to 
section 204 of the FPA, to issue securities and to assume obligations 
or liabilities as guarantor, endorser, surety or otherwise in respect 
of any security of another person; provided that such issue or 
assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of 
Kincaid, compatible with the public interest, and reasonably necessary 
or appropriate for such purposes.
    (H) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public or private interests will 
be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of Kincaid's 
issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 3, 1997.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3744 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     In connection with the Form 10-Q of DeanHolding Company (the “Company”) for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Barry A. Fromberg, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
 /s/ BARRY A. FROMBERG      Barry A. Fromberg     *Executive Vice President and* *Chief Financial Officer*
Date: November 15, 2004
Note: This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 2:04 PM To: Hutson, Nick; Culligan, Kevin; Owens, Nicole Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 -- Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Uni ts Attachments: SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO 12866_13563_111 (b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 _Final.docx; SummaryofInteragencyCommentsUnderEO 12 866_13563_111(b) New-Mods 2060-AQ91 Final_2015050.docx



### Attached please find a summary of interagency comme nts under EOs 12866 and 13563 on the EPA draft fina l rule, Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissio ns from New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units.

Thanks and please let me know if you have any quest ions.

Regards,

Nathan
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gerald MANNING.

No. 61471.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

In re: State of Louisiana through District Attorney, J. Carl Parkerson, applying for writs of certiorari and review and stay order. Ouachita Parish.

Writ denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1  Certification of Interim President,Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Item 307 of Regulation S-K  I, Richard Banakus, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2009;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  /s/: Richard Banakus Richard Banakus
 Interim President, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  June 22, 2009
#### William LOWE, Jr., Petitioner, v. William Joseph CLARK, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 42498.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Sept. 14, 1972.

Certiorari dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 26, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2011 (the "Report"), I, David W. Head, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ DAVID W. HEADDavid W. HeadChief Executive OfficerMarch 10, 2011
#### Joann COOK and Warren W. Cook, her husband, Appellants, v. Edward R. DAVIS, Appellee.

No. 73-619.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 18, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements for the three month period ended August 31, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000027850
<NAME>                        MARITIME TRANSPORT & TECHNOLOGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     $
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00
        



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

 CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C.SS.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Decorator Industries, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 2, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, William A. Bassett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael K.
Solomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date: November 16, 2004    By: /s/  William A. Bassett
      -----------------        ----------------------------------------
                                    William A. Bassett, Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 16, 2004    By: /s/  Michael K. Solomon
      -----------------        -------------------------------------
                                    Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer
May 27, 2015

Mr. James King 6386 S. Old 3C Highway Westerville, OH 43082

Dear Mr. James King:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 16, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1046), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
### SERVE D JUL Y 20 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
INTH EMATTE RO F SKYWES T AIRLINES , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10NM000 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No
. FAA-201 0 - 031 2 

### PROCEDURA L ORDE R Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O no r before Decembe r

31 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , bu t

no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio nrequest s and/o r interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e a discovery disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i natimel y manner... '

(Richar dL!
. Goodwin ^ U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

' Th e partie s hav e agree dt o schedul e thi s cas e th e wee k o f January 10-14 , 201 1 i

nSal t Lak e City , UT
. Th e court wil l endeavo r

t o accommodat e th e request , subjec t t o th e availability o f

court facilities
.FA A Docke t No
. CP10NM000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Michae l L
. Dworkin , Respondent' s Counse l Michae l L
. Dworki nan dAssociate s La w Office s 46 5 Californi aStreet , Suit e 21 0 SanFrancisco , C A 9410 4 TEL : 415-421-250 0 FAX : 415-421-256 0 Scott R
. Morris , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Northwes t

Mountai nRegion , ANM- 7 Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 160 1 Lin dAvenue , S.W
. Renton , W A 9805 7 TEL : 425-227-141 7 FAX : 425-227-100 7 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE l 2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio nAdministration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
258 La. 353

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Henry A. FRANCIS.

No. 51349.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1971.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ denied. The ruling complained of is correct.
Exhibit 32.1







                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I Dan K. Wassong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.









     /S/ DAN K. WASSONG
     ------------------
     Dan K. Wassong
     Chief Executive Officer
     August 4, 2004

<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT HALL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 410 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
No. 10972.

#### Matyas *v.*Heller.

Decided May 12, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Joseph C. Bloch*and Mr. *D. B. Stone,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Abraham Kolinsky,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Si-iauck, Crew, Summers. Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.