alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6820

EDWARD MARKFABIAN HANNAH,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SOLICITOR ’ S OFFICE; BERKELEY COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER ’ S OFFICE; FARLEY LAW, Mitchell E. Farley,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:23

- cv - 01487

- DCN )

Submitted : February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Edward Markfabian Hanna h , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6820 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Edward Markfabian Hannah appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hannah’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Hannah ’ s informal brief does not challenge the dispositive procedural basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The info rmal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6820 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### NEW ORLEANS FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 632 et al. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS et al.

No. 54377.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 15, 1974.

In re: City of New Orleans, Et Al, applying for Certiorari, or Writ of Review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 286 So.2d 674.

Application denied; the judgment of the court of appeal is correct.
#### Wilfredo DE LA ROSA, Appellant, v. TROPICAL SANDWICHES, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 72-1010.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 28, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Michael BURROWS, Appellant, v. Carol A. BRUCE, Appellee.

No. 73-267.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1974.

Joseph P. Metzger, Sales, Metzger & Christiansen, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ronald E. Jones, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*284PER CURIAM.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate error, the judgment appealed from is affirmed and the appellee’s application for an allowance of attorney’s fees is granted. The cause is remanded to the trial court to determine a reasonable attorney’s fee for appellee for this appeal.

OWEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and JOHNSON, CLARENCE T., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  WindsorTech,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Marc Sherman,  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and


         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: November 4, 2002                                /s/ Marc Sherman
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Marc Sherman
                                                      Chairman of the Board and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
258 La. 355

#### BRYER INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. v. Frank S. BRUNO.

No. 51303.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 22, 1971.

In re: Bryer Insurance Agency, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 244 So.2d 667.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
_________________________________________ 

 

_________________________________________ 

_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136836 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

In re SANTINO SAGE BERSAMINA and 

PAIGE MARGUERITE MARIE JOSEPHSON, 

Minors. 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES,

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 136836 

 COA: 281795 

Muskegon CC Family Division: 

03-032554-NA 

LAURA MCCARTHY, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

SANTINO ANGELO BERSAMINA, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

` 

s0722 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 25, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4431]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster Loan Area Number 9378]


North Dakota (And Contiguous Counties in Minnesota, South Dakota 
& Montana); Declaration of Disaster Loan Area

    All counties in the State of North Dakota except Billings, Bowman, 
Golden Valley, and Slope; Clay, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Polk, 
Traverse, and Wilkin Counties in Minnesota; Brown, Campbell, Corson, 
Marshall, McPherson, Perkins, and Roberts Counties in South Dakota; and 
Richland, Roosevelt, and Sheridan Counties in Montana constitute an 
economic injury disaster loan area as a result of severe winter storms 
and blizzard conditions during the period of January 3 through January 
31, 1997. Eligible small businesses without credit available elsewhere 
and small agricultural cooperatives without credit available elsewhere 
may file applications for economic injury assistance until the close of 
business on November 12, 1997 at the address listed below: U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Disaster Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter 
Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155, or other locally announced 
locations. The interest rate for eligible small businesses and small 
agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002)

    Dated: February 11, 1997.
Philip Lader,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-4431 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

 CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         AND ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K

I, David Pollock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hydron Technologies,
   Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
   material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
   procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for
   the registrant and have:

   a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
      ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

   b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation); and

   c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's first
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
   over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
   committee of registrant's board of directors:

   a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

   b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

/s/: David Pollock
------------------
David Pollock
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

May 11, 2007
#### Michael W. DOHERTY, Individually and on behalf of David Lee Doherty, a minor and William Joseph Doherty, Appellants, v. Jane JONES, Ray A. Lindsey a/k/a Lindsey Battery Service, and Lindsey Auto Mart, Inc., Appellees.

No. II-99.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1978.

Stephen Marc Slepin of Slepin & Schwartz, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Dominic M. Caparello of Thompson, Wadsworth, Messer, Turner & Rhodes, Tallahassee, and George P. Daniels of Isler, Higby, Brown, Smoak & Watson, Panama City, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *Palmer v. R. S. Evans, Jacksonville, Inc.,*81 So.2d 635 (Fla.1955); *Escobar v. Bill Currie Ford, Inc.,*247 So.2d 311 (Fla.1971).

SMITH, Acting G. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur. - .
Exhibit 32.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Enzo J.
Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.












/S/ ENZO J. VIALARDI
--------------------
Enzo J. Vialardi
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2003



<PAGE>
ORlGINA.L
 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATNE LAW JUGES 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 9327 

) 

ORDER REQUIRING EXPEDITED RESPONSE 

On October 22,2009, Complaint Counsel submitted a cross motion to compel 

testimony of Philip Bryson.
 

Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.22(c), Respondent is hereby directed to file its 

response to this motion by 3:00 p.m., October 23,2009. 

ORDERED: :D~~
 

D. Michael C pen 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: October 22, 2009 

-- ..
#### William WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Charles L. JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 72-272, 72-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 16, 1973.

W. Daniel Kearney, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant Walker.

Sam E. Murrell & Sons, Orlando, for appellant Jackson.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

Appellants, William Walker and Charles L. Jackson, were charged with the offense of robbery and the use of firearms in the commission of a felony. The case was tried to a jury who returned a verdict of guilty. Both appellants were represented by co-counsel and have appealed. They assign as *138error the same points and we have consolidated the appeals for the purposes of this opinion.

Appellants urge that there was insufficient evidence as a matter of law to sustain the convictions; that hearsay testimony was admitted regarding the commission of another offense that same night; that certain remarks made by the prosecutor were improper and that the entire trial constituted a miscarriage of justice and should be reversed.

We have studied the record in this case and have concluded that the defendants were denied a fair trial, and in the interest of justice the convictions should be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.

The testimony of the complaining witness, an injured Vietnam war veteran, is argumentative, inconclusive, conflicting and appears in certain instances to be unbelievable. This in and of itself would not warrant a reversal because the jury is at liberty to believe what they choose and disbelieve what they choose.

The evidence of a separate crime constituted rank hearsay. Officer Henry testified that he was interviewing a certain Richard Holden and Richard Holden told him that he had seen the defendant’s car where another crime was being perpetrated that same night. Mr. Holden was not allowed to testify. Even if this testimony were not hearsay, it was not admissible pursuant to Williams v. State, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 654. The testimony was not in detail. It did not show a pattern, motive or manner of operation and the supposed victim was not allowed to testify.

The case was a hard fought one from both sides. Accusations and cross-accusations became almost a feature of the trial. This alone would not in and of itself constitute reversible error. However, having read the entire record, viewed the evidence adduced from the victim and the behavior of the prosecutor and the defense counsel and coupled with the hearsay testimony admitted as “Williams Rule” testimony, we have concluded that the defendants did not receive a fair trial under our Constitution.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

McNULTY, J., concurs.

MANN, C. J., concurs specially.

MANN, Chief Judge

(concurring specially).

I do not find the complaining witness’ testimony anywhere near incredible. The prosecutor’s gross misunderstanding of the rule excluding such rank hearsay as was offered here, is incredible.
No. 10064.

#### Deckwitz *v.*Gelbaugh.

Decided March 3, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Montgomery county.

*Messrs. Sprigg, Fitzgerald & Sprigg,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. R. Otto Baumann,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8779-8780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4707]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Biological Sciences; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel In Biological 
Sciences (1754).
    Date and Time: Friday, March 14, 1997; 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation (NSF), Rm. 365, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Marcia Steinberg, Program Director, 
Collaborative Research at Undergraduate Institutions (C-RUI), 
National Science Foundation, Rm. 655, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, 
VA 22230, Telephone 703/306-1443.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: to review and evaluate proposals for Collaborative 
Research at Undergraduate Institutions as part of the selection 
process for awards.

[[Page 8780]]

    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a propriety or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 21, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4707 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 9011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Declaration of Disaster Loan Area 2928; Amendment 1]


Oregon; Declaration of Disaster Loan Area

    In accordance with a notice from the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, dated February 14, 1997, the above-numbered Declaration is 
hereby amended to include the Counties of Coos, Douglas, Lake, and Lane 
in the State of Oregon as a disaster area due to damages caused by 
winter storms, land and mudslides, and flooding beginning on December 
25, 1996 and continuing through January 6, 1997.
    In addition, applications for economic injury loans from small 
businesses located in the contiguous counties of Benton, Harney, 
Lincoln, and Linn in the State of Oregon may be filed until the 
specified date at the previously designated location. Any counties 
contiguous to the above-named counties and not listed herein have been 
previously declared.
    All other information remains the same, i.e., the termination date 
for filing applications for physical damage is March 24, 1997, and for 
loans for economic injury the deadline is October 23, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 59002 and 
59008)

    Dated: February 19, 1997.
Herbert L. Mitchell,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-4924 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
April 8, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN RE JAKESIA SADE CELESTINE, Relator

NO. 14-14-00133-CV 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-21521

This Court heard this cause after granting and issuing a writ of habeas 

corpus on February 14, 2014. This Court holds that the combined judgment of 

contempt and order of commitment entered January 30, 2014 in the 247th District 

Court, Harris County, Texas, in Cause No. 2012-21521, is void in part. Therefore, 

this Court grants relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus in part, and 

accordingly strikes the void language of the trial court’s order as detailed in our 

corresponding opinion. This Court further holds that relator has failed to 

demonstrate that the trial court’s order is void in toto, or that relator is entitled to 

release from the trial court’s order of commitment. Therefore, this Court denies 

relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus in part. 
2

We further order the Clerk of this Court to issue an alias capias for the arrest 

of relator, Jakesia Sade Celestine, and order that she be remanded to the custody of 

the Sheriff of Harris County, Texas, to be confined as ordered by the 247th District 

Court, Harris County, Texas, in Cause No. 2012-21521 pursuant to the combined 

judgment of contempt and order of commitment dated January 30, 2014 by Judge 

Carolyn Marks Johnson, as amended by the opinion of this Court issued in this 

cause.
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

--------------------------------------------------------------

:

In the Matter of :

:

2007/2008/2009 U.S.-CHINA AIR : Docket DOT-OST-2007-28567

SERVICES AND COMBINATION :

FREQUENCY PROCEEDING :

:

--------------------------------------------------------------

MOTION OF UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Hershel I. Kamen

Senior Vice President – Alliances,

 Regulatory & Policy

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

1350 I Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20005-3389

Steve Morrissey

Managing Director – Regulatory Affairs

 and Policy

UNITED AIR LINES, INC. 

1025 Connecticut Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20036

(202) 296-2337

steve.morrissey@united.com

June 14, 2011

Daniel A. Weiss

Managing Director – International

 & Regulatory Affairs

Thomas Newton Bolling

Vice President and Associate General Counsel –

Regulatory,

 Alliances & International

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

1600 Smith Street

15th Floor - HQSLG

Houston, TX 77002

(713) 324-5606

thomas.bolling@united.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have this date served the foregoing document on all persons named below

in accordance with the Department’s Rules of Practice. 

carl.nelson@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

jeff.morgan@delta.com

howard_kass@usairways.com

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

john.martin@flysfo.com

kandace.bender@flysfo.com

challock@newark/newyorkrbp.org

sbaer@panynj.gov

Annalei Avanceña 

International Regulatory Advisor

United Air Lines, Inc.

June 14, 2011