Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 33 / Wednesday, February 19, 1997 / Proposed Rules 7431

Appendix G—DoD Freedom of

Information Act Program Components

a. Office of the Secretary of Defense/Joint

Staff/Unified Combatant Commands, Defense

Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities

b. Department of the Army

c. Department of the Navy

d. Department of the Air Force

e. Defense Information Systems Agency

f. Defense Contract Audit Agency

g. Defense Intelligence Agency

h. Defense Investigative Service

i. Defense Logistics Agency

j. National Imagery and Mapping Agency

k. Defense Special Weapons Agency

l. National Security Agency

m. Office of the Inspector General,

Department of Defense

n. Defense Finance and Accounting Service

o. National Reconnaissance Office

Dated: February 6, 1997.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison

Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 97–3412 Filed 2–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000–04–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation

43 CFR Part 426

[RIN 1006–AA38]

Acreage Limitation Rules and

Regulations

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting and

extension of comment period.

SUMMARY: On December 18, 1996, the

Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation)

published in 61 FR 66827, Dec. 18,

1996, an advance notice of proposed

rulemaking requesting public comment

on possible revisions to existing rules

and regulations regarding the acreage

limitation provisions of the Reclamation

Reform Act of 1982 (RRA). During a

recently completed RRA rulemaking

activity, 61 FR 66754, Dec. 18, 1996, the

Department of the Interior (Department)

received a number of comments

regarding the compliance of certain

large trusts with the acreage limitation

provisions of the RRA. Comments

expressed a variety of viewpoints,

including the assertion that some trusts

with landholdings (owned and leased

land) in excess of 960 acres may

circumvent the requirements of Federal

reclamation law. To help facilitate the

examination of the application of the

acreage limitation provisions to trusts

with large landholdings, Reclamation

will host a meeting at which interested

parties will convene in a round table

arrangement to explore this issue. The

public is invited to attend this session.

This meeting is not intended as a formal

hearing for the submission of comments.

Rather, it is intended as an informal

discussion so that those in attendance

will be better prepared to submit

comments on the advance notice of

proposed rulemaking. To further

facilitate the submittal of comments, the

comment period has been extended to

April 17, 1997.

DATES: The public meeting will be held

on March 14, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. The

comment period on the advance notice

of proposed rulemaking is extended to

April 17, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be

held at The Best Western Expo Inn,

1413 Howe Avenue, Sacramento, CA

Written comments are to be mailed to

the Commissioner’s Office, Bureau of

Reclamation, 1849 C Street N.W.,

Washington, DC 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Steven Richardson, Bureau of

Reclamation, Mail Code W–1500, 1849

C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240,

telephone (202) 208–4291.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the

December 18, 1996, Federal Register

notice, Reclamation requested

comments and suggestions on:

• Whether to limit nonfull-cost water

deliveries to large trusts with

landholdings in excess of 960 acres (or

other applicable acreage thresholds

under the RRA);

• The criteria used to determine

whether landholdings in excess of 960

acres, operated under a trust

arrangement, should be eligible to

receive nonfull-cost water deliveries;

• Whether nonfull-cost water

deliveries to such landholdings are

consistent with the principles of Federal

reclamation law and sound public

policy and, if not, how to implement a

limit on such deliveries;

• What procedures might ensure

fairness in transition to new rules that

would limit large trusts to 960 acres for

nonfull-cost water, and what safeguards

would be necessary to avoid such trusts

from adopting some other, as yet

unregulated form, to escape acreage

limitations; and

• The extent of the Department’s

statutory authority to address these

issues, including, the extent of the

Department’s legal authority to regulate:

(a) future trusts, (b) trusts established

from 1982 to the present, and (c) trusts

established prior to 1982.

Dated: February 11, 1997.

J. Austin Burke,

Director, Program Analysis Office.

[FR Doc. 97–3962 Filed 2–18–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–94–M

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 95

[GEN Docket No. 91–2, DA 97–308]

Interactive Video and Data Services

AGENCY: Federal Communications

Commission.

ACTION: Request for comments on waiver

request.

SUMMARY: This action seeks additional

comment on waiver of the three year

construction benchmark that IVDS

lottery license winners must meet by

March 29, 1997. It is necessary for the

Commission to receive comment on the

waiver request in order to determine if

the waiver should be granted. The effect

of the action will be to seek comment

on the requested rule waiver.

DATES: Comments are due February 25,

1997; reply comments are due March 3,

1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments and reply

comments should be sent or delivered

to: Office of the Secretary, Federal

Communications Commission, 1919 M

Street, N.W., Room 222, Washington,

D.C. 20554, Att’n Private Wireless

Division, Wireless Telecommunications

Bureau.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

William T. Cross of the Wireless

Telecommunications Bureau at (202)

418–0680.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a

summary of the Commission’s Public

Notice released February 10, 1997. The

full text of this action is available for

inspection and copying during normal

business hours in the FCC Reference

Center, Room 239, 1919 M Street, NW.,

Washington, DC. The complete text may

be purchased from the Commission’s

copy contractor, ITS, Inc., (202) 857–

3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140,

Washington, DC 20037.

Summary of Public Notice

1. In the Report and Order in GEN

Docket No. 91–2, the Commission

concluded that a major concern of

potential users of this service was that

an applicant who obtained a license

through the lottery process may not

actually build the IVDS system. The

IVDS rules require, therefore, that

licensees must construct a sufficient