alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Contractor's Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation Form Approved OMB No. 2030 - 0016 1. Contractor's Address (include zip c ode) 2. Contract No.
3. Total amounts claimed under this contract ( less disallowances concurred by the contractor and disallowances not subject to appeal) and approved on Public Vouchers Nos. to ( including completion vouchers). Item Amount Direct Labor $ Dir ect Material and Supplies $ Equipment $ Travel $ Subcontract Costs $ Other Direct Costs $ Consultant Fees $ Fixed Fee $ Indirect Costs (Total From Section 4) $ 

### Total Amount Claimed $ 4. Reconciliation of Indirect Costs Claimed. of indirect costs calculated, for each cost center, using negotiated final indirect cost rate(s).

Use provisional rate(s) if final rates are not negotiated for any fiscal year period(s). Use the reverse side of this form, ifnecessary, to display all yea rs and cost centers. Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center FY Base Rate Indirect Costs FY Base Rate Indirect Costs FY Base Rate Indirect Costs 

### Totals No monies or other benefits may be paid unless this report is completed and filed as required in the EPA billing instructions. I certify that the information provided on this form and attachments thereto is accurate and complete. lse or misleading information may be punishable by fine and/or imprisonment under applicable law. Name and Title (Print or Type) Signature Date Record the amount

I acknowledge that any knowingly fa

EPA Form 1900- 10 (Rev. 2 - 04) Previous Edition is Obsolete

### Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to a verage 30 minutes per response, including the time for searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing data. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information (including suggestions for reducing this burden) to: (1) Manager , Policy and Oversight Service Center (mail code 3802R) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 12

00 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460; and (2) Paperwork Reduction Project (OMB No. 2030 -0016) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget Washington, DC 20503. Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center Cost Center FY Base Rate Indirect Costs FY Base Rate Indirect Costs FY Base Rate Indirect Costs FY Base Rate Indirect Costs FY Base Rate Indirect Costs Totals

No monies or other benefits may be paid unless this report is completed and filed as required in the EPA b illing instructions.
#### CAMERON MEADOWS LAND CO. v. Daniel R. BULLARD et al.

No. 60571.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Daniel R. Bullard, et al applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Cameron.

Writ denied. The result is correct.

SUMMERS and DENNIS, JJ., are of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7220 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7220

 To require the Corps of Engineers to include study of the impacts of 
 sea-level rise and low-frequency precipitation events in addition to 
  the impacts of coastal hurricanes in certain studies, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2020

 Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York (for himself, Ms. Velazquez, and 
Mr. Espaillat) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Corps of Engineers to include study of the impacts of 
 sea-level rise and low-frequency precipitation events in addition to 
  the impacts of coastal hurricanes in certain studies, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hudson River Climate Change 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF THE STUDY OF SEA-LEVEL RISE AND LOW-FREQUENCY 
              PRECIPITATION EVENTS IN CERTAIN CORPS OF ENGINEERS 
              STUDIES.

    In carrying out the examination and survey required under the Act 
of June 15, 1955 (Public Law 84-71; 69 Stat. 132), and the study and 
report required under the heading ``Corps of Engineers--Civil--
Investigations'' under title II of Division A of the Disaster Relief 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113-2), the Corps of Engineers 
shall--
            (1) immediately begin to include as an additional subject 
        of such examination and study the threat of sea-level rise and 
        low-frequency precipitation events and the impacts of sea-level 
        rise and low-frequency precipitation events on the environment, 
        communities, and ecosystem services; and
            (2) carry out such examination and study in accordance with 
        section 1001 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act 
        (33 U.S.C. 2282c).
                                 <all>
```
8:30 Registration

9:30 Welcome & Introductory Remarks

Chairman Jon Leibowitz

Federal Trade Commission

10:00 Panel 1

Facial Detection & Recognition Technology: How Does It Work? 

MODERATOR: 

Mark Eichorn

Assistant Director

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection 

Federal Trade Commission

PANELISTS: 

Ralph Gross

Postdoctoral Fellow

Carnegie Mellon University

Dr. P. Jonathon Phillips

Electronic Engineer

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

10:30 Break

Agenda December 8, 2011
December 8, 2011

2

10:45 Panel 2

Facial Detection: Uses and Ramifications

MODERATOR: 

Manas Mohapatra

Attorney

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection 

Federal Trade Commission

PANELISTS:

Fred Carter

Senior Policy & Technology Advisor

Information and Privacy 

Commissioner’s Office

Ontario, Canada 

Andrew Cummins

Chief Strategy Officer

SceneTap 

Harley Geiger

Policy Counsel

Center for Democracy and Technology

Beth Givens

Director

Privacy Rights Clearinghouse 

Jai Haissman

Founder & CEO

Affective Interfaces

Brian Huseman

Senior Policy Counsel

Intel Corporation

12:00 Lunch

1:15 Remarks

Commissioner Julie Brill

Federal Trade Commission

1:30 Panel 3

Facial Recognition: What’s Possible Now and What Does the Future Hold? 

MODERATORS:

Amanda Koulousias and Jessica Lyon, Attorneys

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection

Federal Trade Commission

PANELISTS:

Alessandro Acquisti

Associate Professor

Carnegie Mellon University

Chris Conley

Technology & Civil Liberties Fellow

ACLU of Northern California

Gil Hirsch

Co-founder and CEO

face.com

Benjamin Petrosky

Product Counsel

Google Inc.
3

2:45 Break

3:00 Panel 4

Facial Detection & Recognition: Exploring the Policy Implications 

MODERATORS: 

Maneesha Mithal

Associate Director

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection

Federal Trade Commission

Laureen Kapin

Counsel for International Consumer Protection

Office of International Affairs

Federal Trade Commission

PANELISTS:

Joseph J. Atick, Ph.D.

Vice Chairman

International Biometrics &

Identification Association

Daniel Caron

Legal Counsel

Office of the Privacy Commissioner 

of Canada

Pam Dixon

Executive Director

World Privacy Forum

Erin Egan

Senior Policy Advisor & Director, Privacy

Facebook 

John Verdi

Senior Counsel

Electronic Privacy Information Center 

Simon Rice

Principal Policy Adviser, Technology

Information Commissioner’s Office

United Kingdom

Daniel J. Solove

John Marshall Harlan Research 

Professor of Law

George Washington University Law School

4:30 Closing Remarks

Jessica Rich

Deputy Director

Bureau of Consumer Protection

Federal Trade Commission
Federal Trade Commission | December 8, 2011
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7193 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to adjust the penalty for unjust 

conviction and imprisonment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Ms. WATERS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to adjust the penalty 

for unjust conviction and imprisonment, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Exonerees 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PENALTY FOR UNJUST CONVICTION AND IMPRIS7 ONMENT. 

8 Section 2513 of title 28, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7193 IH

1 (1) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘$70,000’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(f) The amount of damages awarded under sub5 section (e) shall be adjusted for inflation annually, based 

6 on the Consumer Price Index.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Lonnie L. BLALOCK v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47861.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 25, 1974.

George M. Simmerman, Pascagoula, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Ben H. Walley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; Merle F. Palmer, Judge.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and PATTERSON, SMITH, ROBERTSON and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.5.7 12-31-2013






Exhibit 10.5.7


AMENDMENT #1
TO
CBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES, INC.
2012 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




Pursuant to the determination of the Board of Directors of the Company and by action of the Company’s shareholders at the Annual Shareholders Meeting of May 7, 2012, the CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted.  Pursuant to the determination of the Board of Directors by Resolutions dated November 3, 2013 and January 7, 2014, the Plan is amended as follows:


The Plan is amended by deleting Section 12(a)(ii) of the Plan and inserting in lieu thereof the following as new Section 12(a)(ii):


(ii) Non-Employee Directors shares, as defined below, in an amount not to exceed 10,000 shares of Non-Employee Director Shares per grant each year.




Dated to be effective as of December 31, 2013.




CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.


	
		
	By:
	\s\ Stephen D. Lebovitz

	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer









166
No. 10356.

#### Cook, Guardian, *v.*Masters et al.

Decided May 5, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Morrow county.

*Messrs. Mitchell & Bmce*and *Mr. L. K. Powell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Piarían & Wood*and *Mr. I. W. Barry,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Blair HEINLEIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-50.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 19, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1971.

Alfred M. Carvajal, Walter E. Gwinn, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and J. Robert Olian, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Morgan v. State, Fla. App. 1962, 142 So.2d 308; Martino v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So.2d 495.
PROGRAMA DE AYUDA AL ALQUILER DE EMERGENCIA

DE OREGÓN (OERAP)

VISITA, HAGA CLIC, ¡Y ENVÍE SU SOLICITUD HOY!

Nombre del solicitante:

Dirección de la propiedad en renta:

Nombre del arrendador (nombre a donde se envía la renta):

Dirección del arrendador:

Teléfono del arrendador:

Correo electrónico

del arrendador:

¿El arrendador está autorizado a administrar la propiedad? Sí No Desconocido

Fecha de mudanza del solicitante: Vencimiento de la tenencia (no se requiere):

Pago de renta mensual: Renta vencida:

¿Están incluidos los servicios públicos en el pago de la renta? Sí No No En caso afirmativo, indique:

Entiendo que es posible que debo proporcionar información adicional o responder preguntas adicionales porque no

puedo presentar un contrato de arrendamiento por escrito o una verificación de la relación entre el arrendador y el

inquilino y la renta adeudada con la firma de mi arrendador.

Certifico que la información presentada en esta certificación es verdadera y precisa a mi leal saber y entender.

Además, entiendo que proporcionar una representación falsa constituye un acto de fraude. Proporcionar

información falsa, engañosa o incompleta puede resultar en la denegación de la solicitud, el reembolso de los fondos

recibidos a través del Programa de asistencia de emergencia para pagos de renta en Oregón (OERAP) u otros

remedios disponibles bajo la ley, que incluyen, entre otros, responsabilidades y sanciones bajo la Ley de

Reclamaciones Falsas de Oregón.

Firma del solicitante Nombre del solicitante,

en letra de imprensa

Fecha

(si no hay contrato de arrendamiento por escrito Y el arrendador no puede o no quiere firmar la verificación

de la relación arrendador/inquilino)

Autoverificación de la relación entre el arrendador y el inquilino y la renta adeudada
Exhibit 10.56**FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**     This First Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into and effective asof June 15, .2006 (the Effective Date”), by and between Cyberonics, Inc. (the“Company”) and Randal L. Simpson (“Employee”).RECITALS     WHEREAS, the Company and Employee previously entered into an EmploymentAgreement dated October 27, 2003 (the “Agreement”), which Agreement remains infull force and effect as of this date. The Company and Employee now desire toamend the Agreement as provided herein.     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth in thisAmendment and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows:TERMS1. Section 2 of the Agreement (“Term”) is deleted in its entirety and the followingprovision is inserted therefor:“Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, unless sooner terminatedpursuant to Section 5 of this Agreement, Employee shall be employed by the Companycommencing on the Effective Date and terminating on June 1, 2009 (the “Term”)Termination of this Agreement shall not alter or impair any rights of Employee (orhis beneficiaries or heirs) with respect to payments, benefits or other rightsprovided by the terms of this Agreement, arising before or after the end of theTerm.”*2.*Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the provisions of the Agreementremain unchanged and in full force and effect.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have caused the Amendment to be executed in one or morecounterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original.     Cyberonics, Inc. Employee:     By: /s/ Robert P. Cummins /s/ Randal L. Simpson       Robert P. Cummins Randal L. Simpson  Chairman of the Board of Directors and
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8812-8813]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice No. 2511]


Shipping Coordinating Committee Subcommittee on Safety of Life at 
Sea; Working Group on Bulk Liquids and Gases; Notice of Meeting

    The Working Group on Bulk Liquids and Gases (BLG) of the 
Subcommittee on Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9:30 am on Monday, March 24, 1997 in Room 6319, U.S. Coast 
Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20593-
0001. The purpose of the meeting is to finalize preparations for the 
Second Session of the Subcommittee on Bulk Liquids and Gases of the 
International Maritime Organization (IMO) which is scheduled for April 
7-11, 1997, at the IMO Headquarters in London.
    The agenda items of particular interest:
    a. Tanker pump-room safety.
    b. Revision of the International Convention for the Prevention of 
Pollution from Ships, 1973 as modified by the Protocol of 1978 (MARPOL 
73/78) regulations I/22 to 24 in the light of the probabilistic 
methodology for oil outflow analysis.
    c. Review of Annexes I and II of MARPOL 73/78.
    d. Revision of carriage requirements for carbon disulfide in the 
International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying 
Dangerous Chemicals in Bulk (IBC Code).
    e. Requirements for personal protection involved in transportation 
of cargoes containing toxic substances in oil tankers.
    f. Amendments to the International Code for the Construction and 
Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk and the Code for 
the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in 
Bulk.

[[Page 8813]]

    g. Revision of chapter 8 of the IBC Code in the light of the 
revised SOLAS regulation II-2/59.
    h. Evaluation of safety and pollution hazards of chemicals and 
preparation of consequential amendments.
    i. Assessment of alternative tanker designs.
    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Commander K. S. Cook, U.S. Coast Guard (G-MSO-3), 2100 Second 
Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20593-0001 or by calling (202) 267-1577.

    Dated: February 12, 1997.
Russell A. La Mantia,
Chairman, Shipping Coordinating Committee.
[FR Doc. 97-4745 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-M
#### ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 13, 1973.

Robert P. Gaines, Beggs, Lane, Daniel, Gaines & Davis, Pensacola, for appellant.

Geoffrey B. Dobson, Barbara Ann Dell McPherson, and Betty Owen Stinson, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Region I Advisory Council; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Region I Advisory Council 
located in the geographical area of Providence, Rhode Island, will hold 
a public meeting on Friday, March 7, 1997 at 8:00 a.m., at the 
Providence Marriott, Charles at Orms Street, Providence, Rhode Island 
to discuss such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the 
U.S. Small Business Administration, or others present.

    For further information, write or call the office of the 
District Director, Providence District Office, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 380 Westminster Street, Providence, Rhode Island 
02903. (401) 528-4561.

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Michael P. Novelli,
Director, Office of Advisory Councils.
[FR Doc. 97-4269 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
United States of America

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20580 

Mary K. Engle

Associate Director

September 6, 2017 

{Name and Address} 

Dear {Name}: 

As you may recall, I wrote to you in March regarding one of your Instagram posts 

endorsing {product or products}. As I said in my earlier letter, if you are endorsing a brand and 

have a “material connection” with the marketer (that is, a connection or relationship that might 

affect the weight or credibility that your followers give the endorsement), then your connection 

should be clearly and conspicuously disclosed, unless the connection is already clear from the 

context of the endorsement. Material connections could consist of a business or family 

relationship, or your receipt of payment, free products or services, or other incentives to promote 

the brand. 

{Number} of your other Instagram posts, attached to this letter, [has/have] recently come 

to our attention. {Description of post or posts.} [In the picture, you tagged {description.}] [The 

FTC staff believes that tagging a brand is an endorsement of the brand. Accordingly, if you have 

a material connection with the marketer of a tagged brand, then your posts should disclose that 

connection.] [None/neither of these posts discloses/This post does not disclose] whether you 

have material connections with the [brands and businesses] endorsed in the post[s]. 

[In another post, you {description} and you wrote, “Thank you ....” As my earlier letter 

explained, a simple “thank you” is probably inadequate to inform consumers of a material 

connection because it does not sufficiently explain the nature of your relationship; consumers 

could understand “thank you” simply to mean that you are a satisfied customer.] 

[In a ... post, you {description of post}. Although you acknowledge {connection to the 

brand} that does not appear until line[s] {number(s)} of your post. As my earlier letter 

explained, consumers viewing posts in their Instagram streams on mobile devices typically see 

only the first three lines of a longer post unless they click “more,” and many consumers may not 

click “more.” Therefore, you should disclose any material connection above the “more” button.] 

Please provide a written response to this letter by September 30, 2017 advising the FTC 

staff of whether you have a material connection with each of the brands or businesses that you 

endorsed in these posts: {brands and businesses}. If you have a material connection with [any 

of them], please describe what actions you are or will be taking to ensure that your social media 

posts endorsing brands and businesses with which you have a material connection clearly and 

conspicuously disclose your relationships. 
{Name}

September 6, 2017

Page 2

Please direct your correspondence to Michael Ostheimer or Mamie Kresses of my office. 

If you have any questions, contact Mr. Ostheimer at (202) 326-2699 or mostheimer@ftc.gov or 

Ms. Kresses at (202) 326-2070 or mkresses@ftc.gov. Thank you.

Very truly yours,

Mary K. Engle

Associate Director

Division of Advertising Practices