alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Cliff HALL, Jr., and Sean Brian Hall, By and Through Cliff Hall, Jr., his parent and next friend, Appellants, v. Alan M. WITZEL et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1087.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 31, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 29, 1973.

*250Paul Siegel and Henry M. Sinclair, of Sinclair, Louis’Sand & Siegel, Miami, and Belli, Ashe, Ellison, Choulos & Lieff, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

James E. Tribble, of Blackwell, Walker & Gray, Miami, for appellees City of West Palm Beach and Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.

John W. Dell, of John W. Dell, P. A., West Palm Beach, for appellee Hamilton Electric Co.

MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Circuit dismissing with prejudice the appellants’ amended complaint as to Def.endants-City of West Palm Beach and Hamilton Electric Co., and entering final judgment for said city and its insurer Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

The amended complaint alleged that Sean Brian Hall, age 7, had been injured by fire which was started by Richard Witzel, age 8, who lighted matches or firecrackers while the boys were playing in a trash container known as a Dempster Dumpster. The Dumpster is alleged to be a large metal waste container designed for easy emptying, with two lids on top which could remain open or closed. It had sleeves about midway up on the outside which received the pickup forks. There were no such sleeves on the inside. It was reasonably easy for a child to climb into the Dumpster but difficult to climb out. The Dumpster contained a variety of combustible materials including excelsior or straw, grease and paper.

The pivotal point is whether the Dumpster constituted an attractive nuisance.

There is a failure to allege sufficient ultimate facts to establish that the Dumpster was inherently dangerous. The contents of the Dumpster are not in the category of “inflammable materials” such as “live wires”, “explosive substances” or “spring guns”.

The items causing the fire were matches and firecrackers which were not a part -of the Dumpster or its contents but were brought upon the scene and lighted by the eight year old defendant.

The order and judgment appealed are affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

s0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

136892 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 136892 

 COA: 285079 

Wayne CC: 07-014937 

ERVIN M. SANDERS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in 

People v Idziak, 484 Mich 549 (2009). 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak, 484 

Mich 549 (2009).
#### WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY, a division of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, Appellant, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Pennsylvania corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-570.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 7, 1973.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1973.

Heiman & Crary, Miami, and Manuel Diner, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, Pyszka, Blomqvist & Davant, Miami, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See American Fire and Casualty Co. v. Charles Sales Corp. of Orlando, Fla.App.1967, 203 So.2d 670, cert. denied, Fla.1968, 210 So.2d 866; State of Florida for Use and Benefit of Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. Wesley Construction Co., S.D.Fla.1970, 316 F.Supp. 490, aff’d, 5th Cir.1972, 453 F.2d 1366.
#### Olga MARTI, Appellant, v. Issac BAROCAS, Appellee.

No. 72-1051.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 27, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 1973.

Greenberg & Murray, Miami, for appel-. lant.

Herskowitz & Grossman, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Beatty v. Strickland, 136 Fla. 330, 186 So. 542 (1939); Benner v. Pedersen, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 722.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 713 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 713

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
   for beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for 
    military sexual trauma in specialized outpatient or residential 
 programs at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2019

Mrs. Walorski (for herself and Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
   for beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for 
    military sexual trauma in specialized outpatient or residential 
 programs at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENEFICIARY TRAVEL FOR VETERANS SEEKING TREATMENT OR CARE 
              FOR MILITARY SEXUAL TRAUMA IN SPECIALIZED OUTPATIENT OR 
              RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 111 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by adding at the end the 
        following subparagraph:
            ``(H) A veteran whose travel to a specialized outpatient or 
        residential program at a Department facility is in connection 
        with treatment or care for military sexual trauma.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) In this section:
            ``(1) The term `military sexual trauma' means psychological 
        trauma, which in the judgment of a Department mental health 
        professional, resulted from a physical assault of a sexual 
        nature, battery of a sexual nature, or sexual harassment which 
        occurred while the veteran was serving on active duty or active 
        duty for training.
            ``(2) The term `sexual harassment' means repeated, 
        unsolicited verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature which 
        is threatening in character.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to travel occurring after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                               APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                              (754)
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     14,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       1,174
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  15,012
<PP&E>                                                             2,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                                     1,724
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    23,189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             13,599
<BONDS>                                                           10,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              1,744
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               1
<OTHER-SE>                                                         5,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      23,189
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                  50,709
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                     40,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     447
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 1,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      310
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        (140)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  450
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        .06
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10- QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul D. Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                /s/ PAUL D. CLARK
                                ------------------

                                    PAUL D. CLARK
                                    PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                    AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OCTOBER 20, 2004
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7523 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to make certain airport projects 

eligible under TIFIA, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2020 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself, Mr. SCHIFF, and Mr. LAMB) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to make certain 

airport projects eligible under TIFIA, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TIFIA for Airports 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROJECT ELIGIBILITY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601(a)(12) of title 23, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (E) by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

10 the end; 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7523 IH

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (F) as sub2 paragraph (G); and 

3 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (E) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(F) is an eligible airport-related project 

6 by a public agency, as such terms are defined 

7 in section 40117(a) of title 49; and’’. 

8 (b) AIRPORT PROJECTS.—Section 602(c)(1) of title 

9 23, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘, the 

10 requirements of appendix A and sections 3, 9, and 10 of 

11 part 158 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, or the 

12 procurement procedures allowed under section 40117 of 

13 title 49 and preference under section 50101 of title 49 

14 for airport projects’’ after ‘‘transit projects’’. 

15 (c) SPECIAL RULE FOR AIRPORT PROJECTS.—Sec16 tion 602 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 

17 adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(f) SPECIAL RULE FOR AIRPORT PROJECTS.—Not19 withstanding any other provision of this chapter, a project 

20 described in section 601(a)(12)(F) shall only be eligible 

21 for funding under this chapter with respect to any unobli22 gated or uncommitted balance remaining from a fiscal 

23 year prior to the fiscal year in which such project receives 

24 approval under subsection (d)(2).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Stanley G. MOSES, Petitioner, v. Donald S. GENUNG, as Sheriff of Pinellas County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-683.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 22, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
No. 10667.

#### Stroud et al. *v.*The West Huron Sporting Club.

Decided June 16, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Huron county.

*Mr. George A. True*and *Mr. John McCrystal,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. E. B. King; Mr. Charles W. Sadler; Mr. Malcolm Kelly*and *Messrs. King, Williams & Ramsey,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### Nettie C. Henry BOWERS, Appellant, v. William H. BOWERS, Appellee.

No. 73-695.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 30, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; David U. Strawn, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clark E. COLVIN, Jr.

No. 60940.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Clark E. Colvin, Jr. applying for writ of review and other supervisory writs. Parish of Ouachita.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a Writ of Certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Robert T. Farr, Judge of the Fourth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Ouachita, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 25th day of January, 1978, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel shall show cause, in this court, on a date to be fixed by this Court at 10 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of NaturalNano, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kent A. Tapper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| Date:  April 9, 2008 | By:    | /s/Kent A. Tapper                                         |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | ________________________________

Chief Financial Officer |
|                 |   |                                                      |
#### Sam J. VITRANO v. Gregory VITRANO.

No. 61527.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 3, 1978.

In re: Joan Melancon, applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Charles. 353 So.2d 398.

Writ not considered: Insufficient showing and insufficient compliance with our Rules to justify relief.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 1, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                           1,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                       975
<INVENTORY>                                     24,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,655
<PP&E>                                          48,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,404
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,321
<SALES>                                        103,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,008
<CGS>                                           72,875
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,238
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,402
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,836
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4873]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 C.F.R. 50.7, and 42 
U.S.C. 9622(d), notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree 
in United States and the State of Oregon v. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany, 
No. 97-169-RE, (D. Ore.), was lodged on January 31, 1997, with the 
United States District Court for the District of Oregon. with regard to 
the Defendant, the Consent Decree resolves a claim filed by the United 
States on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 
(``EPA'') pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et 
seq.
    The United States entered into the Consent Decree in connection 
with the Teledyne Wah Chang Site (``the Site''), located in 
Millersburg, Oregon. The Consent Decree provides that the Defendant 
will reimburse the United States $154,000 for response costs incurred 
and to be incurred at the Site. Further, the Defendant will be required 
to implement remedial actions set forth in two Records of Decision for 
the Site, at an estimated cost of $7.5 million, and to reimburse EPA 
for its costs of overseeing the remedial work. The Site is an operating 
producer of zirconium and hafnium metals.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States and the State of Oregon v. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany, DOJ 
Ref. #90-11-2-558.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the office of the 
United States Attorney, 888 Southwest 5th Avenue, Suite 1000, Portland, 
Oregon, 97204-2024; the Region 10 office of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington; and at the 
Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed Consent Decree may 
be obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 
G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy 
refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount of 
$18.50 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the Consent 
Decree Library.
Bruce S. Gelber,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-4873 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M