alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 Notice is Hereby Given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for the institutions listed below, intends to terminate its receivership for said institutions. Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Date of appointment of receiver10096
Peoples Community Bank
West Chester
OH
7/31/200910204
First Lowndes Bank
Fort Deposit
AL
3/19/201010266
Home Valley Bank
Cave Junction
OR
7/23/201010520
First Cornerstone Bank
King of Prussia
PA
5/6/2016
 
 
 The liquidation of the assets for each receivership has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receiverships will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receiverships shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of any of the receiverships, such comment must be made in writing, identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and be sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.6, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of the above-mentioned receiverships will be considered which are not sent within this time frame. Dated at Washington, DC, on June 1, 2018. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2018-12139 Filed 6-4-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
No. 11041.

#### Stewart *v.*Gardner et al.

Decided June 23, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Lucas county.

*Mr. Orville C. Bramback*and *Mr. Malcolm McAvoy,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Lewis W. Morgan; Mr. W. P. Duffy; Mr. Lawrence F. Conway*and *Messrs. Mallahan & Conway,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

*452Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew and Davis, JJ.,.concur.
Monica A. Duffy, Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, Albany, for Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department.

Vicente Lines, San Jose, Costa Rica, respondent pro se.

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by May 2019 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 172 AD3d 1706, 1738 [2019]; see Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16; Rules of App Div, 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits sworn to June 28, 2019, and upon reading the December 23, 2019 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined, by clear and convincing evidence, that (1) respondent has complied with the order of suspension and the Rules of this Court, (2) respondent has the requisite character and fitness to practice law, and (3) it would be in the public interest to reinstate respondent to the practice of law (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Zerdan], 173 AD3d 1602, 1603 [2019]; Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a [Serbinowski], 164 AD3d 1049, 1051 [2018]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, effectively immediately.

Egan Jr., J.P., Clark, Devine, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68284-68285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34010]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-147-000]

Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 23, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 18, 1997, Texas Eastern Transmission 
Company (Tetco), 5400 Westheimer Court, P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas 
77251-1642, filed in Docket No. CP98-147-000 a request pursuant to 
Sections

[[Page 68285]]

157.205 and 157.211, of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for approval to construct and 
operate facilities for Elizabethtown Gas Company in Union County, New 
Jersey, under Tetco's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-
535-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more 
fully set forth in the request which is on file with the Commission and 
open to public inspection.
    Tetco states that it proposes to construct, install, own, operate 
and maintain a four-inch tap valve and four-inch check valve on Tetco's 
existing twenty-four-inch crossover header from Lines Nos. One and Two 
and a six-inch tap valve and six-inch check valve on Tetco's existing 
Line No. Twenty in Union County, New Jersey. Tetco asserts that 
Elizabethtown will install, or cause to be installed, a dual four-inch 
meter run, two hundred-fifty feet of connecting pipeline and electronic 
gas measurement equipment. Tetco asserts that the transportation 
service through the proposed facilities will be rendered pursuant to 
Tetco's Rate Schedule FT and that Tetco's tariff does not prohibit the 
addition of delivery points. Tetco further asserts that its proposal 
will be accomplished without detriment or disadvantage to Tetco's 
existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34010 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
```
#### Thomas Lee BERRY, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 73-1181.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 26, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
#### Ellen Rochelle BOSEM, Appellant, v. Arie Lionel BOSEM et al., Appellees.

No. 70-568.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 09/11/2014

FROM: Laura Farris/EPA Region 8

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

SUBJECT: South Dakota 111d Call held on 09/11/2014

SUMMARY: 

EPA participated in a conference call with the State of South Dakota on 09/11/2014 to discuss their 

questions about the inclusion of hydroelectric power in the Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, 

which was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Headquarters

Jan Cortelyou

Brian Fisher

Gabrielle Stevens, 

Beth Conlin

Matt Clouse

Jeremy Mark

Lora Strine

EPA Region 8

Laura Farris

Tim Rehder

External Stakeholders

SD Public Utilities Commission: Brian Rounds and Darren Kearney

SD Department of Environment and Natural Resources: Brian Gustafson, Kyrik Rombough
#### John Gorden SANDERSON et al., Appellants, v. Laurie SIEGEL et al., Appellees.

No. 70-1038.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
255 La. 788

#### JANES BROS., INC. v. Hughie PERRY, Sheriff and Tax Collector of Morehouse Parish.

No. 50362.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1970.

In re: Hughie Perry, Sheriff and Tax Collector of Morehouse Parish applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Morehouse. 229 So.2d 147.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.

FOURNET, C. J., and McCALEB, J., think a writ should be granted.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40456

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESUS ISRAEL ARCE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-496-01

--------------------

December 12, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Israel Arce appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for possession with the intent to distribute more than

100 kilograms but less than 1000 kilograms of marijuana. Arce

contends that 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional in light of

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

 As Arce concedes, his argument is foreclosed by this court's

decision in United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th
No. 02-40456

-2-

Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1045 (2001). He raises the

issue only to preserve it for Supreme Court review. The judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Order No. 870]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 40 Cleveland, OH, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, an application from the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port 
Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone No. 40, for authority to 
expand its general-purpose zone at sites in the Cleveland, Ohio, area, 
within the Cleveland Customs port of entry, was filed by the Foreign-
Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on March 12, 1996 (Docket 21-96, 61 FR 12060, 
3/25/96);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board has found that the requirements of the Act and 
the regulations would be satisfied, and that the proposal would be in 
the public interest provided approval is subject to a 2,000-acre 
activation limit;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The grantee is authorized to expand its zone as requested in the 
application, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.28, and subject to a 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of February 1997.
Robert S. LaRussa,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 97-4222 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 41 (Wednesday, March 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 11506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4615]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement 
(BOEMRE)

Cancellation of Oil and Gas Lease Sale 219 in the Cook Inlet 
Planning Area on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS)

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, 
Interior.

ACTION: Cancellation of Cook Inlet Lease Sale 219.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior has decided to cancel Cook 
Inlet Sale 219 that is scheduled to occur in the Revised Program for 
2007-2012. Cancellation of Sale 219 due to lack of interest is 
necessary to allow sufficient time to gather new baseline data for 
environmental review, analysis, and identification of mitigating 
measures. The time will also be used to further develop and implement 
measures to improve the safety of oil and gas development in Federal 
waters.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Renee Orr, BOEMRE, Chief, Leasing 
Division, at (703) 787-1215 or renee.orr@boemre.gov.

    Dated: January 25, 2011.
Michael R. Bromwich,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and 
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-4615 Filed 3-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
EXHIBIT 32

       CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Decorator Industries, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 2, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, William A. Bassett, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,
and Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2005
                                   By: /s/  William A. Bassett
                                       -----------------------
                                       William A. Bassett,
                                       Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: August 12, 2005
                                   By: /s/  Michael K. Solomon
                                       -----------------------
                                       Michael K. Solomon,
                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John ALEXANDER v. Israel M. AUGUSTINE, Judge, Criminal District Court, et al.

No. 60889.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: John Alexander applying for writ of mandamus. Orleans Parish.

Writ denied. The motion is moot.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-103489, 333-111997,333-56438, 333-87223) of Veritas DGC Inc. of our report dated April 28,2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,which appears in Veritas DGC Inc.’ s Form 10-K for the period endingJuly 31, 2004.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Houston, Texas

June 16, 2005

 

----
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
Zorko, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 By:
                /s/
      Mark A ZorkoName:
                Mark
      A ZorkoTitle:
                Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
                December
      16, 2008
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### Doud et al. *v.*City of Cincinnati et al.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *constitutional question involved.*

(No. 18340

Decided March 18, 1924.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

*Mr. Fyffe Chambers,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. Saul Zielonka,*city solicitor, and *Mr. Frank K. Bowman,*assistant city solicitor, for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged that the petition in error be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones, Matthias, Day and Allen, JJ., concur.
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

November 19, 2015

Hon. Coretta T. Graham

Graham Legal Services

PO Box 60026

Corpus Christi, TX 78466

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Mark Skurka

District Attorney

901 Leopard Street, Room 205

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Mr. Waymond Anderson

TDCJ# 01997761

Dominguez Unit

6535 Cagnon Road

San Antonio, TX 78252

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00258-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 09-CR-2559-F

Style: Waymond Anderson v. The State of Texas

Appellant’s motion to withdraw as counsel (Hon. Coretta T. Graham) was this 

day CARRIED WITH THE CASE by this Court.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch
H. R. 7460 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To extend the authority for the establishment by the Peace Corps Commemorative 

Foundation of a commemorative work to commemorate the mission of the Peace 

Corps and the ideals on which the Peace Corps was founded, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Corps Commemorative 

Work Extension Act’’. 

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF 

COMMEMORATIVE WORK TO COMMEMORATE THE MISSION 

OF THE PEACE CORPS AND THE IDEALS ON WHICH THE 

PEACE CORPS WAS FOUNDED. 

Notwithstanding section 8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, 

the authority to establish the commemorative work under section 

1(a) of Public Law 113–78 (40 U.S.C. 8903 note; 128 Stat. 647) 

shall continue to apply through January 24, 2028. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Megadata Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
P. Devaney, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            By:  /s/ Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Jeffrey P. Devaney
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 September 14, 2007



                                    Page 32
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7480 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7480

 To extend by one year the legislative authority under section 8903(e) 
   of title 40, United States Code, for certain commemorative works.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 2, 2020

Mr. Burchett (for himself, Mr. David P. Roe of Tennessee, and Mr. Crow) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend by one year the legislative authority under section 8903(e) 
   of title 40, United States Code, for certain commemorative works.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMMEMORATIVE WORKS LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY EXTENDED.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Veterans 
Memorial Extension Act''.
    (b) Findings.--Congress finds as follows:
            (1) America's veterans served nobly around the world.
            (2) Veteran memorials face significant challenges to meet 
        fundraising requirements.
            (3) COVID-19 has disrupted charitable donations 
        significantly.
            (4) In-progress monuments to honor American leadership at 
        home and abroad should receive flexibility to meet the 
        challenges of COVID-19.
    (c) Authority.--The seven-year legislative authority under section 
8903(e) of title 40, United States Code, is hereby extended for a 
period of one year for each commemorative work that was authorized 
under chapter 89 of that title during the seven-year period immediately 
before the date of the enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```