alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP97-239-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 10, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, filed a request with 
the Commission in Docket No. CP97-239-000, pursuant to Sections 
157.205, and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to operate under the provisions of 
Section 7(c) of the NGA an existing interconnection in Harper County, 
Oklahoma, that has been constructed pursuant to Section 311 of the 
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA) authorized in blanket certificate 
issued in Docket Nos. CP82-480-000 and CP88-532-000, all as more fully 
set forth in the request on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    ANR seeks authorization to operate a previously constructed 
interconnection (KansOk Interconnection) with the pipeline system of 
Kansok Partnership (KansOk), constructed in October, 1994. The 
facilities consist of a hot tap and tie-in assembly located on ANR's 
existing 20-inch pipeline. The facilities were originally constructed 
at a cost of approximately $29,000, for which ANR was fully reimbursed 
by KansOk. ANR delivers natural gas at this interconnection ``on behalf 
of'' KansOk for the account of MarGasCo Partnership. The KansOk 
Interconnection was reported in ANR's 1994 Annual Report of NGPA 
Section 311 construction in Docket No. CP95-370-000.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Sec. 157.205 of the Regulations 
under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest 
is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity shall be deemed 
to be authorized effective the day after the time allowed for filing a 
protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after 
the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be 
treated as an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of 
the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3974 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### William A. SWAN et ux., Plalntiffs-Appellants, v. James THOMAS et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11436.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

May 26, 1970.

Wilson, Veatch & Booth, by Thomas A. Wilson, Shreveport, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Bodenheimer, Jones, Klotz & Simmons, by G. M. Bodenheimer, Jr., Shreveport, for defendants-appellees.

Before AYRES, DIXON and PRICE, JJ-

DIXON, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from an adverse judgment in their damage suit.

Mrs. Swan was driving alone at night at an intersection of blacktop roads when she lost control of her car and drove into a ditch. She said she lost control of her car when an automobile attempted to make a left turn in front of her, and she had to go around the car to miss it.

Mrs. Swan was driving in a westerly direction on the Flournoy-Lucas Road. *669The defendants were on the same road driving in an easterly direction. As the automobiles approached the intersection of the Wallace Lake Road and St. Vincent Avenue, the defendants stopped in preparation for turning to the left.

Also stopped at that intersection were the witnesses Dorothy and Maurice Wilson. Their automobile was on the Wallace Lake-St. Vincent road, headed north, but stopped at a stop sign waiting for the other two vehicles to clear the intersection.

Mrs. Swan said that the Thomas vehicle started its turn to the left as she entered the intersection, but stopped before completing the turn. Nevertheless, Mrs. Swan testified that the Thomas vehicle crossed the centerline of the road, leaving insufficient room for her to pass, making it necessary for her to swerve her car to the right to avoid hitting the Thomas automobile. In swerving to the right, she encountered some obstruction, and lost control of her vehicle. She was injured when her car crashed into the ditch.

Alice and James Thomas admitted that they planned to turn to the left, but denied that they had crossed the centerline. They testified that their automobile was brought to a halt with sufficient room for the Swan automobile to pass, and that Mrs. Swan’s automobile seemed to be out of control as it came across the intersection.

The Wilsons testified that the Thomas automobile had crossed the centerline, and had failed to leave sufficient room for Mrs. Swan to pass.

The trial judge was in a better position than we to weigh the testimony of the witnesses. The Wilsons were confused on portions of their testimony. The Thomas vehicle was between them and the center-line of the road. They were not in the best position to judge the width of the road left for Mrs. Swan to pass. We cannot say, from the evidence in the record, that the trial judge committed error in holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed, at the cost of the appellants.
#### Leonard ADAMS v. EYE, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT HOSPITAL et al.

No. 60199.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: Leonard Adams applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 346 So.2d 327.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in the judgment complained of.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999,  AND THE  CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF INCOME  FOR THE YEAR  ENDED  JUNE 30,  1999,  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                    11,720
<SECURITIES>                              15,200
<RECEIVABLES>                             19,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                 637
<INVENTORY>                               11,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          62,689
<PP&E>                                    24,347
<DEPRECIATION>                            18,675
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            69,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     15,128
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  50,161
<OTHER-SE>                                 4,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              69,695
<SALES>                                   82,027
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          82,027
<CGS>                                     44,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             78,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            4,371
<INCOME-TAX>                               1,749
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        2,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,622
<EPS-BASIC>                                .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .30



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00171-CV

James HERNANDEZ,

Appellant

v.

R. A. OSBORNE ENTERPRISES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-19771

The Honorable Richard E. Price, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 21, 2013

DISMISSED

On July 30, 2013, Appellant filed a letter informing the court that the parties had settled 

their dispute. On August 1, 2013, Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellant’s 

motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). Costs of the 

appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them. See id. R. 43.4.

PER CURIAM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

1 

In the Matter of 1 

1 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, N.V., 1 

a foreign corporation, 1 

1 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, 1 Docket No. 9300 

a corporation, and 

1 

PITT-DES MOINES, INC., 1 

a corporation. 1 

To: Commission 

COMPLAINT COUNSEL'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS' MOTION TO 

EXTEND TIME FOR FURTHER BRIEFING ON SPECIFIC REMEDY ISSUES 

Complaint Counsel do not object to the motion of Respondents Chicago Bridge & Iron 

Company and Chicago Bridge & Iron company N.V. ("CB&I Respondents") to extend to June 6, 

2005, the time within which CB&I Respondents shall file their brief pursuant to the 

Commission's May 10,2005, Decision and Order Partially Denying Respondents' Petition for 

Reconsideration and Directing Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues. 

DATED: May 20,2005. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Rhett R. Krulla 

Elizabeth A. Piotrowski 

Steven L. Wilensky 

David Von Nirschl 

Counsel Supporting the Complaint 

Bureau of Competition 

Federal Trade Commission 

Washington, D.C. 20580 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I today caused: 

One original and twelve copies of Complaint Counsel's Response to 

Respondents' Motion to Extend Time for Further Briefing on Specific Remedy 

Issues to be served, by hand delivery, and one copy to be served, by electronic 

mail, upon: 

Office of the Secretary 

Federal Trade Commission 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20580 

And one copy, by first-class mail, upon each of the following: 

Clifford H. Aronson 

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 

Four Times Square 

New York, NY 10036-6522 

(212) 735-2644 

Charles W. Schwartz 

Sltadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP 

1600 Smith, Suite 4400 

Houston, TX 77002-7348 

(713) 655-5160 

Counsel for Respondents Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. and Clucago 

Bridge & Iron 

Jennifer L. Gray 

Robert M. Unger 

Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner LLP 

900 Third Avenue 

New York, NY 10022 

(212) 895-2130 

Rhett R. Krulla 

Counsel Supporting the Complaint 

Dated: May 20,2005
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-30655, 333-74747, 333-74715, 333-78521,333-78567, 333-83725, 333-35806, 333-62502, 333-84010, 333-90986 and 333-91002on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32221, 333-60277, 333-70335,333-85269, 333-92361, 333-32526, 333-40698, 333-47914,  333-81170, 333-84932 and 333-98221 on FormS-3 of THQ Inc. of our report dated June 14, 2004, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of THQ Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2004.

 
|                          |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Los Angeles,  California |
| June 14,  2004           |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of NaturalNano, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report"), I, Cathy A.
      Fleischer, President of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                  April 2,
                  2007By:
                /s/ Cathy
                  A.
                  FleischerName:
                        Cathy A. Fleischer
                      Title:
                        President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

In re SANCTUARY BELIZE

LITIGATION Civil No. PJM 18-3309

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an ever-unfolding saga of post-judgment motions, several defaulted defendants^ in this

case (together, "Defaulted Defendants") have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

60(b)(5) for relief from the default judgments entered against them on January 13, 2021. In their

short, one-page Motion, the Defaulted Defendants claim that the judgments have been nullified by

AMG Capital Management, LLC v. Federal Trade Commission, 141 S. Ct 1341 (2021). No further

analysis is provided. For the reasons the follow, their Motion is DENIED.

As an initial matter, the Court has already pointed out why AMG Capital does not ipso

facto render the judgments in this case void. See In re Sanctuary Belize Litig., — F. Supp.3d —,

Civ.No. PJM 18-3309,2021 WL 1117763 (D. Md. Mar. 24,2021). In its Opinion rendered before

the Supreme Court reached its decision, the Court considered the effect that a decision in AMG

Capital adverse to the FTC might have, reasoning that: "this Court's findings of fact and

determinations as to liability—including contempt of court and violations of the Telemarketing

• Namely, John Usher, Global Property Alliance Inc., Sittee River Wildlife Reserve, Buy Belize LLC, Buy

International Inc., Foundation Development Management Inc., Eco-Futures Development LLC, Eco-Futures Belize

Ltd., Newport Land Group LLC, Power Haus Marketing, Prodigy Management Group LLC, Belize Real Estate

Affiliates LLC, Exotic Investor LLC, Southern Belize Realty LLC, Sanctuary Belize Property Owners' Association,

and the Estate of John Pukke. ECF No. 1267.

Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1278 Filed 08/24/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:18-cv-03309-PJM Document 1278 Filed 08/24/21 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Richard E. MOLINA.

No. 62593.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 7, 1978.

In re: Richard E. Molina applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus, prohibition and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

*882Denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VeritasDGC Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”),I, Mark E. Baldwin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;

 

2.  The information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for theperiods presented as required by such report.

 

June 1, 2005

 

 
| /s/ MARK E. BALDWIN     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Mark E. Baldwin         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Veritas DGC Inc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 7, 2018.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 4, 2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express Contract 62 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2018-158, CP2018-228.                

Elizabeth Reed,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2018-12252 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 3, 1997 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                           1,542
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                       463
<INVENTORY>                                     24,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,256
<PP&E>                                          44,109
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,746
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,634
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           198
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,660
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,809
<SALES>                                         58,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,330
<CGS>                                           40,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (48)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,809
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,809
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of DataMetrics Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                March 17, 2008
            By:
            */s/
              John Marceca*Name:
                John MarcecaTitle:
                President & Chief Operating Officer




Date:
                March 17, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Tami
              TharpName:
                Tami TharpTitle:
                Acting Chief Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided DataMetrics Corporation and will be retained
      by DataMetrics Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.