8706 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 38 / Wednesday, February 26, 1997 / Notices

C. Are there alternate sources of data

and do you use them? If so, what are

their deficiencies and/or strengths?

Comments submitted in response to

this notice will be summarized and/or

included in the request for OMB

approval of the form. They also will

become a matter of public record.

Statutory Authority: Section 3506(c)(2)(A)

of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

(Pub. L. No. 104–13).

Issued in Washington, D.C. February 20,

1997.

Lynda T. Carlson,

Director, Office of Statistical Standards,

Energy Information Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–4694 Filed 2–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. CP97–246–000]

ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of

Application

February 20, 1997.

Take notice that on February 14, 1997,

ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 500

Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan

48243, filed an application pursuant to

Sections 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act and

Part 157 of the Commission’s

Regulations for authorization to utilize

temporary work spaces and for any

other authorization deemed necessary

associated with a pipeline replacement

project in Kendall County, Illinois, all as

more fully set forth in the application

on file with the Commission and open

to public inspection.

ANR states, that in order to satisfy

U.S. Department of Transportation

safety regulations, it proposes to replace

both a 0.27 mile and 0.29 mile line

segment of its main line system due to

increased population density in the

area. ANR states that in order to make

the replacement it will have to utilize

work areas which may not have been

included in the scope of the original

authorization to construct the facilities.

Therefore, ANR requests the temporary

use of work space and any other

authorizations deemed necessary by the

Commission in order to make the

replacement. ANR states that the

construction will be done under the

authority of Section 2.55 of the

Commission’s Regulations, which

authorizes replacement within the

existing right-of-way.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

make any protest with reference to said

application should on or before March

13, 1997, file with the Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission, Washington,

D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a

protest in accordance with the

requirements of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR

385.211 and 385.214) and the

regulations under the Natural Gas Act

(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with

the Commission will be considered by

it in determining the appropriate action

to be taken but will not serve to make

the protestants parties to the

proceeding. Any person wishing to

become a party in any proceeding

herein must file a motion to intervene

in accordance with the Commission’s

rules.

Take further notice that, pursuant to

the authority contained in any subject to

the jurisdiction conferred upon the

Commission by Sections 7 and 15 of the

Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s

Rules of Practice and Procedure, a

hearing will be held without further

notice before the Commission or its

designee on this application if no

motion to intervene is filed within the

time required herein, if the Commission

on its own review of the matter finds

that permission and approval for the

proposed abandonment are required by

the public convenience and necessity. If

a motion for leave to intervene is timely

filed, or if the Commission on its own

motion believes that formal hearing is

required, further notice of such hearing

will be duly given.

Under the procedure herein provided

for, unless otherwise advised, it will be

unnecessary for ANR to appear or to be

represented at the hearing.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4673 Filed 2–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. ER97–1170–000]

Bangor Hydro Electric Company;

Notice of Filing

February 20, 1997.

Take notice that on December 31,

1996, Bangor Hydro Electric Company

tendered for filing a Pro Forma Open

Access Transmission Tariff. Bangor

Hydro states that this submittal is to

remove higher voltage network facilities

from its tariff.

Any Person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

February 27, 1997. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4721 Filed 2–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

[Docket No. RP95–408–018]

Columbia Gas Transmission

Corporation; Notice of Compliance

Filing

February 20, 1997.

Take notice that on February 14, 1997,

Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation

(Columbia) tendered for filing as part of

its FERC Gas Tariff, Second Revised

Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed on

Appendix A to the filing, to become

effective on February 1, 1997.

On December 31, 1996, as revised on

January 17, 1997, Columbia filed revised

tariff sheets in Docket No. RP95–408, et

al. that, inter alia, would implement

lower settlement rates pending

Commission action on the November 22,

1996 settlement in this docket,

contingent upon customers being

subject to a surcharge in the event the

settlement is not approved or

implemented. The Federal Energy

Regulatory Commission (Commission)

issued its order on Columbia’s filings on

January 29, 1997 (78 FERC ¶ 61,071),

which accepted the revised tariff sheets

but which required that Columbia file

revised tariff sheets setting forth the

existing rates which any customer that

does not agree to the surcharge

provision may pay until the settlement

is acted upon by the Commission.

Columbia states that the instant filing

is being made in compliance with that

order. The revised tariff sheets herein

indicate they are ‘‘Collection Rates’’ and

contain a statement that they are

applicable to customers not wanting to

be subject to the surcharge condition

associated with paying the Settlement

Rates. These tariff sheets reflect the rates

that were in effect in the billing month

preceding February 1, 1997.

Columbia states that copies of its

filing have been mailed to all parties in

this proceeding, firm and interruptible

customers, and affected state

commissions.

Any person desiring to protest this

filing should file a protest with the