alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORIGINAL

~7~~~~~:~~', ø:, 'CR¡\'h. \"J!¡'1li),.!~..", n,t'1- . . . "1.8\' ""

~~v ;;;¡J "8 ¿'j" 7 'i ....Sç.\ RE"i:ì'lfi=r f!0.r.!;tii~P~TS u~o..."\'

AU6 1 7 2009 )

5"'I'ID3:¿ ./

SECRETA?''!

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

Polypore International, Inc.

a corporation. PUBLIC

ERRTA SHEET

This is an Errata Sheet to Respondent's Responses to Complaint Counsel's Proposed

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (IN CAMERA) fied on July 31, 2009.

Page No. Line Corrections

344 4 Additional in camera information indentified.

PPAB 1596129vl
Dated: August 17, 2009 Respectfully Submitted,

Wiliam L. Rikard, Jr. eu. (/v4

Eric D . Welsh

PARKR POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP

Three Wachovia Center

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone: (704) 372-9000

Facsimile: (704) 335-9689

williamikard~parkerpoe.com

ericwelsh~parkerpoe.com

John F. Graybeal

PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP

150 Fayettevile Street

Raleigh, NC 27602

Telephone: (919) 835-4599

Facsimile: (919) 828-0564

iohngraybeal~parkerpoe.com

Attorneys for Respondent

PPAB 1596129vl
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 17, 2009, I caused to be fied via hand delivery and

electronic mail delivery an original and two copies of the foregoing Errata Sheet to

Respondent's Responses to Complaint Counsel's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions

of Law fIN CAMERA/ filed on July 31, 2009 (PUBLIC), and that the electronic copy is a true

and correct copy of the paper original and that a paper copy with an original signature is being

fied with:

Donald S. Clark, Secretary

Offce of the Secretary

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Rm. H-135

Washington, DC 20580

secretary~ftc.gov

I hereby certify that on August 17, 2009, I caused to be served one copy via electronic

mail delivery and two copies via overnight mail delivery of the foregoing Errata Sheet to

Respondent's Responses to Complaint Counsel's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions

of Law fIN CAMERA/filed on July 31,2009 (PUBLIC) upon:

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell

Administrative Law Judge

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

oali~ftc.gov

I hereby certify that on August 17, 2009, I caused to be served via first-class mail

delivery and electronic mail delivery a copy of the foregoing Errata Sheet to Respondent's

Responses to Complaint Counsel's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law fIN

CAMERA/filed on July 31,2009 (PUBLIC) upon:

J. Robert Robertson, Esq.

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

rrobertson~ftc.gov

Steven Dah, Esq.

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

sdah~ftc.gov

PPAB 1596129vl
Brian R. Weyhric sq.

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

Three Wachovia Center

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000

Charlotte, NC 28202

Telephone: (704) 335-9534

Facsimile: (704) 335-9776

PPAB 1596129vl
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 725 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 725

  To amend chapter 85 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify that 
      Federal employees excepted from a furlough are eligible for 
           unemployment compensation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2019

Mrs. Dingell (for herself and Mr. Upton) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 85 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify that 
      Federal employees excepted from a furlough are eligible for 
           unemployment compensation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pay Federal Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES 
              EXCEPTED FROM FURLOUGH.

    (a) In General.--Section 8502 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f)(1) With respect to any lapse in appropriations beginning on 
or after December 22, 2018, each excepted Federal employee shall be, 
solely for the purpose of determining eligibility for unemployment 
compensation under this subchapter, deemed for the duration of the 
lapse in appropriations to be--
            ``(A) totally separated from Federal service; and
            ``(B) eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under 
        this subchapter with no waiting period for such eligibility to 
        accrue.
    ``(2) In this subsection, the term `excepted Federal employee' 
means a Federal employee who--
            ``(A) is an excepted employee or an employee performing 
        emergency work, as such terms are defined by the Office of 
        Personnel Management; and
            ``(B) is not being paid due to a lapse in 
        appropriations.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to weeks of unemployment beginning on or after December 22, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8742-8743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4698]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation      Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire 
or control voting securities

[[Page 8743]]

or assets of a company that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.25 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.25) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. Once the notice has been accepted for processing, it will 
also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the 
question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 
of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 12, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (James A. Bluemle, Vice 
President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1413:
    1. Pinnacle Financial Services, Inc., St. Joseph, Michigan; to 
acquire Indiana Federal Corporation, Valparaiso, Indiana, and thereby 
indirectly acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Indiana Federal 
Bank for Savings, Valparaiso, Indiana, and thereby operate a savings 
association, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(9); 100 percent of the voting 
shares of IndFed Mortgage Company, Valparaiso, Indiana, and thereby 
engage in community development activities, pursuant to Sec.  
225.25(b)(6); 100 percent of the voting shares of IFB Investment 
Services, Inc., Valparaiso, Indiana, and thereby act as investment or 
financial advisor, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(4), and provide 
securities brokerage services, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(15); and 
33.33 percent of Forrest Holdings, Inc., and its wholly owned 
subsidiary, Forrest Financial Corporation, both of Lisle, Illinois, and 
thereby engage in leasing, pursuant to Sec.  225.25(b)(5).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 20, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-4698 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
255 La. 801

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Claudell HAMMONS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50406.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1970.

In re: Claudell Hammons applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6820

EDWARD MARKFABIAN HANNAH,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

DEPARTMENT; NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SOLICITOR’S OFFICE; 

BERKELEY COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE; FARLEY LAW, 

Mitchell E. Farley,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:23-cv-01487-DCN)

Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024

Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Markfabian Hannah, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6820 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Markfabian Hannah appeals the district court’s order adopting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Hannah’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 

34(b). Because Hannah’s informal brief does not challenge the dispositive procedural basis 

for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. 

See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an 

important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved 

in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6820 Doc: 9 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00251

- CV

Herbert L. POLINARD, Jr., Appellant

v.

Jo Ann KARAMBIS, Maragaret Comparin, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and EXP Realty LLC, Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court

, Bexar Count y, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 11887 Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 8, 2021, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, notifying this court that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record based on the recalculated, corrected

costs.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide pro of to this court within ten (10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee.

It is f urther ORDERED that the clerk’s record must be filed no later than ten (10) days after the date appellant’s written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecu tion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 9th day of July, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AMHN, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2010 (the Report), I, Robert Cambridge, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert Cambridge   
|Robert Cambridge       
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 3, 2010         

A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



19
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 5, 2016














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of June 30, 2016 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$12,238Sub-advised funds614Institutional accounts4,732Total$17,584





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,787Small-Mid Cap2,794Large Cap7,728Select (All Cap)471Long-Short4,349Corporate Credit455Total$17,584








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:July 5, 2016By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
SERVED DECEMBER 22, 2010 . --ART[,1E1\1T Ot 

• !^J3PdRtATtON 

^ •] OPER/JIONS 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10NM0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0312 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The Complaint of Complainant Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter 

"Complainant") was filed on April 2, 2010. Respondent SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

(hereinafter "Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing on March 29, 2010. 

On December 20, 2010, Respondent withdrew its Request for Hearing and asked 

that the matter be terminated, citing settlement. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the 

answer, the administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 
1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing be and is hereby 

granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

I I 

• -ii 

i 

i f 

i-
FAA Docket No. CP10NM0002 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel 

Michael L. Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

Scott R. Morris, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

.Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL; 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Ad visor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1998
<CASH>                                           3,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,031
<INVENTORY>                                     77,868
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,442
<PP&E>                                          68,032
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,783
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,165
<BONDS>                                          1,663
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,026
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,094
<SALES>                                         59,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,044
<CGS>                                           43,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,039)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (969)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,070)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)

<FN>           The amount reported as EPS-PRIMARY
               above is Basic Earnings Per Share as
               defined in Statement of Financial
               Accounting Standards No. 128.


        

</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 18

- 11329

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:17

- cv
- 00085

- RH

- GRJ

BRANDY CARNLEY, VIRGINIA J. LINDSEY,
Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

versus FRANK MCKEITHEN, individually and in his official capacity as former Sheriff of Bay County Florida, et al., Defendants, TOMMY FORD, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Bay County,
Defendant

- Appellant.

____________ ____________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ ( August 30, 2019 ) Case: 18-11329 Date Filed: 08/30/2019 Page: 1 of 22 Before WILSON, NEWSOM , and COOGLER , ∗ Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Bay County Sheriff Tommy Ford appeals the denial of post

- tri al motions for renewed judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial. Brandy Carnley and Virginia J. Lindsey brought this action for damages against the Sheriff under 42
U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that their constitutional rights were violated when they

wer e sexually assaulted by a correctional officer when they were detained pre

- trial. The jury returned a verdict for Carnley and Lindsey. We have read the briefs and
reviewed the record , and with the benefit of oral argument we find no reversible
error. Th e judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED

.

∗ Honorable L. Scott Coogler, District Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama , sitting by designation.

Case: 18-11329 Date Filed: 08/30/2019 Page: 2 of 2