alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3720]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-53, RM-9003]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Garden City, MO

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by R. Lee 
Wheeler and Sarah H. Wheeler proposing the allotment of Channel 287A to 
Garden City, Missouri, as that community's first local broadcast 
service. The coordinates for Channel 287A at Garden City are 38-33-49 
and 94-11-53. There is a site restriction 0.6 kilometers (0.4 miles) 
west of the community.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 31, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 15, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC. 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, as follows: R. Lee and Sarah H. Wheeler, 3718 W. 
52nd Terrace, Shawnee Mission, Kansas 66205.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-53, adopted January 31, 1997, 
and released February 7, 1997. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-3720 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter J. Zable, Chairman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
|   | /s/ W. J. Zable                                   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | W. J. Zable                                       |   |
|   | Chairman, President,  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                                              |   |
|   | Date: August 5, 2008                         |   |

 

----
a50817071ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


















March 4, 2014












Mr. Richard A. Montoni


Chief Executive Officer


MAXIMUS, Inc.


1891 Metro Center Drive


Reston, Virginia 20190












Re:           Amendment of Income Continuity Plan and Employment Agreement







Dear Rich:







You and MAXIMUS, Inc. (“MAXIMUS”) entered into an Executive Employment, Non-Compete and Confidentiality Agreement effective April 24, 2006 which was subsequently amended on November 20, 2007, December 22, 2009 and October 7, 2013 (the “Employment Agreement”).  In addition, you are a Participant in the MAXIMUS Income Continuity Plan (“Plan”) which is incorporated by reference into the Employment Agreement.







MAXIMUS proposes to amend the Plan for all Participants to delete Section 4 (Excise Tax Gross-Up) such that no Participant will be eligible for an excise tax gross-up payment arising from a change of control of the Company under the Plan or any other plan, document or agreement pertaining to such Participant’s employment with MAXIMUS, including but not limited to your Employment Agreement.







If you agree to the amendment set forth above, please sign where indicated below and return the signed version of the letter to me.  All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement and the Plan shall remain unchanged.







Please contact me with any questions.  Thank you.







Sincerely,







 



	/s/ David R. Francis	 
	 
David R. Francis

	 
	General Counsel 	 





 







AGREED:


 



	/s/ Richard A. Montoni	 
	 
Richard A. Montoni

	 
	 	 
	March 4, 2014	 
	Date
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T YO VA NA VI AN E Y N OL AS C OVI LL ACRE , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 72209 A ge nc yN o. A 029- 561- 192 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary11, 2013 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , T A S H IM A , an dW A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Y ovanaV i ane yN ol a s c o- V i l l a c r e , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of P e ru, pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e ope n r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs ba s e d on i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of

c ouns e l . W e have 

# FI LED FEB 14 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 72209 2 j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am o tio n to r e o p e n , an dr e v ie w d e n o v o c o n s titu tio n a l c la im s . Moh am m ed v. G o n z a les , 4 0 0 F . 3 d7 8 5 , 7 9 1 - 9 2 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 5 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on orvi ol a t e due pr oc e s s i n de ny i ng N ol as co-V i l l ac re ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as unt i m el y, w here i tw as fi l ed ov ert en ye ar s a f te rh e ro r d e ro f

r e m o v a l b e c am e f

in a l, se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) ( m o tio n to r e ope n ge ne r a l l ym us tbe f i l e d w i thi n 90 day s of

the f i na l or de r ) , and N ol a s c o- V i l l a c r e f

a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha ts he qua l i f i e d f ore qui t abl e t ol l i ng of

the f ilin g d e a d lin e , se e A vagyan v. H older , 646 F . 3d 672, 678- 80 ( 9th C i r . 2011) (e qu i t abl e t ol l i ng i s avai l abl e t o a pet i t i on erw ho es t abl i shes thatshe w as prevent ed f r o m f ilin g b e c au s e o f

d e c e p tio n , f

r au do re rr o r , an de x e r c is e ddu e d ilig e n c e in d is c o v e r in g s u c h c ir c u m s tan c e s ) ; s e e a l s o La ta v . I

NS , 2 0 4 F .3 d1 2 4 1 , 1 2 4 6 ( 9 th C i r. 20 00 ) ( re qu i ri ng error and prej ud i ce t o p re vai l on a due process cl ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11


                               Dean Foods Company
               Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share
                   (In Millions, Except for Per Share Amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Three Months Ended
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         August 27,   August 29,
                                                              2000         1999
                                                         ---------    ---------
<S>                                                      <C>          <C>
Net Income                                                $ 26.4       $ 27.8
                                                          ======       ======


EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic                                                     $  .74       $  .71
                                                          ======       ======
Diluted                                                   $  .74       $  .70
                                                          ======       ======


Weighted average common shares outstanding                  35.5         39.3
Net additional shares issuable in connection with stock
     options                                                  .3           .6
                                                          ------       ------
Adjusted weighted average common shares                     35.8         39.9
                                                          ======       ======
</TABLE>

                                       12
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROCHELLE SILVER,

Appellant,

v.

BLAIR DIMITRO,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2804

[May 19, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502016DR009066XXXMB.

Rochelle Silver, Boynton Beach, pro se.

No briefs filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4897]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated October 21, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on November 14, 1996, (61 FR 58424), Norac Company, Inc., 405 
S. Motor Avenue, Azusa, California 91702, made application by renewal 
to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of tetrahydrocannabinols (7370), a basic class of 
controlled substance listed in Schedule I.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Norac, Company, 
Inc. to manufacturer tetrahydrocannabinols is consistent with the 
public interest at this time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. Sec. 823 
and 28 C.F.R. Secs. 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant 
Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders that the 
application submitted by the above firm for registration as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed above is 
granted.

    Dated February 6, 1997.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-4897 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 1st Source Corporation (1st Source) on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Murphy
III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:








(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of 1st Source.











By:








/s/CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY
III


Christopher
J. Murphy III


Chief
Executive Officer


April 24,
2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                         140,492
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  482,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    525,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,157,471
<PP&E>                                         348,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                 310,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,237,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          585,139
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       148,265
<OTHER-SE>                                     489,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,237,652
<SALES>                                        396,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               398,447
<CGS>                                          202,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156,859
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,762
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,762
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
#### Peter H. PROHASKA, and Louise A. Prohaska, his wife, Appellants, v. REED POOLS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-1337.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 15, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Jose Gonzalez, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Rayfield MOORE, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 70-914.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 16, 1970.

Habeas corpus denied.
exhibit_4a-87.htm










Exhibit 4.(a).87 

 


[State Emblem]









The State of Israel


Ministry of Communications







General License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of


Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT) Services using the Cellular Method


 


Amendment No. 71







By virtue of the authority of the Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our other powers under any law and after having considered the arguments of Partner Communications Company Ltd. (hereinafter: “Partner”), we hereby amend the General License for the provision of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998,  as follows:







Amendment of Article 31








	
1.

	
At the end of Article 31.1 shall come: "During the erection period, this report shall be integrated into the outline engineering report, as set forth in Article 104.1(e)."












Amendment of Article 104








	
2A. 

	
After sub-section 104.1 (d), shall come:












"   (e)           Outline engineering report- an engineering report for the erection, development and upgrade of the network in the format set forth in Appendix B."








	
2B. 

	
Sub-sections 104.4 (a)-(f) shall be cancelled.












Amendment of Article 108








	
3.

	
In sub-section 108.2 (b), in the marked place shall come:












"Appendix B-The engineering plan that is attached to Appendix B;"







Amendment of Appendix B








	
4.

	
Instead of Appendix B shall come the attached.












Commencement and Director Provisions








	
  

	
(a)

	
This amendment shall become effective upon its signature date.







 




  





  











  






 



	
  

	
(b)

	
In chapters A and B-engineering report summary-shall be submitted immediately and no later than August 1, 2013.







 



	
  

	
(c)

	
The full report, chapters A-E shall be submitted at the end of each calendar year no later than the last working day of the year (31.12.20XX).












(  July 10, 2013)


 



	
     (sgd)


    ________________ 


    Senior Deputy Director-General,


    Engineering and Licensing

	
______________


Haim Giron


Shmila Maymon


Acting Director General







 


2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Envirogen, Inc. on Form S-8 (File 333-09267), Form S-8 (File No. 33-54708), Form
S-3 (File No. 333-12883), Form S-3 (File No. 333-6991), and Form S-3 (File No.
33-78982) of our report dated February 20, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Envirogen,
Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




                                          Coopers & Lybrand  L.L.P.


Princeton, New Jersey
March 11, 1997
1 Gift cards offered by retailers (such as stores and restaurants) fall under the

Federal Trade Commission’s jurisdiction, while those offered by depository institutions do not. 

The Office of Comptroller of the Currency has issued a guidance on disclosures and marketing

issues for gift cards issued by national banks. See OCC Bulletin 2006-34 (Aug. 14, 2006). 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

August 14, 2007

Cheryl Ferris

 

Re: In the Matter of Kmart Corporation, Kmart Services Corporation, and

Kmart Promotions, LLC, corporations

FTC File No. 062 3088 

Dear Ms. Ferris:

Thank you for the comments you submitted regarding the above-referenced matter. Your

comments were placed on the public record pursuant to Section 2.34 of the Commission’s Rules

of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 2.34, and were given serious consideration by the Commission.

The Commission anticipates that this proposed consent order will send a strong message

that retailers1

 must adequately disclose these material conditions when selling gift cards. Indeed,

over the last few years, the Commission staff has observed that many retailers have already

changed their marketing practices. While many retailers eliminated expiration dates or fees

altogether, staff has found generally that disclosures by retailers still imposing fees have

improved. After considering all of the factors that must be weighed in evaluating any settlement,

including the specific facts, consumer injury, and the need to ensure that the remedies deter

similar behavior by other retailers, the Commission concluded that the strong injunctive

provisions and mandatory refund provision provide a positive result for consumers and an

appropriate resolution of this case.

After considering your comments, the Commission has determined that the public

interest would best be served by issuing the Decision and Order in final form without

modification. Respondents will be required to comply with the Order’s injunctive and

reimbursement provisions, and will be subject to potentially large civil penalties if they violate

the Order.
Page 2

Please remember that you may access the Commission’s Consumer Hotline at (202)

326-3569 for updated information about how to receive a refund if your Kmart gift card was

charged dormancy fees. 

Thank you again for your comments. The Commission is aided in its analysis by hearing

from a variety of sources in its work, and it appreciates your interest in this matter.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioners Harbour and Leibowitz concurring in

part and dissenting in part.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
#### UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FLORIDA, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. STATE BOARD OF INDEPENDENT COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, Appellee.

No. 72-832.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 20, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1




SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION*


(Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officers of QSGI INC., hereby certify, to such officers’
knowledge, that:






(1) the
accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QSGI INC. (the “Company”) for the
period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and






(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      May 14, 2008
            
            /s/ Marc ShermanMarc
      Sherman
              Chairman
      of the Board and
              Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      May 14, 2008
            
            /s/ Edward L. CummingsEdward
      L. Cummings
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer





__________________


* The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.