alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-48]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-258; RM-8967]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Valdez, AK

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of North Wave Communications, Inc., seeking the 
allotment of FM Channel 227A to Valdez, Alaska, as that community's 
first local FM transmission service. Coordinates used for this proposal 
are 61-07-00 and 146-16-00. As Valdez, Alaska, is located within 320 
kilometers (199 miles) of the Canadian border, the Commission must 
obtain the concurrence of the Canadian government to this proposal.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before February 18, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before March 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Michael H. Bader, 
Esq., Haley Bader & Potts, P.L.C., 4350 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 900, 
Arlington, VA 22203-1633.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-258, adopted December 
20, 1996, and released December 27, 1996. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW, Washington, DC The complete text of this decision may also 
be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-48 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Veritas DGC Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Mark E. Baldwin, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.  The Form 10-Q fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934;

 

2.  The information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented as requiredby such report.

 

March 8, 2006

 

 
| /s/ MARK E.  BALDWIN     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Mark E. Baldwin          |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veritas DGCInc. and will be retained by Veritas DGC Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

CRAIG CARTER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 362 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

I, Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

1.       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
         December 29, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
         as amended; and

2.       The information  contained in the Periodic  Report fairly  presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Dated:  February 12, 2003

                                     /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Rachel Alaffa JERNIGAN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-10408.

D.C. No. CR-00-01010-EHC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 13, 2002.

Decided Aug. 2, 2002.

*128Before GOODWIN, HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Rachel Alaffa Jernigan appeals her conviction for armed bank robbery, alleging a number of trial errors and challenging the sufficiency of the evidence that a real weapon was used in the bank robbery. We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding the expert testimony of Dr. Loftus. The district court found that Dr. Loftus’ testimony regarding the weaknesses of eyewitness identification would not be helpful to the jury, and it issued Ninth Circuit Model Jury Instruction § 4.14, which we have approved in the past. *United States v. Rincon,*28 F.3d 921, 925-26 (9th Cir.1994). While such an instruction will not immunize all decisions to exclude the information Dr. Loftus would have presented, the court here invited the parties to submit a more comprehensive instruction, but Jernigan never did so.

The district court also properly excluded the expert testimony regarding Jernigan’s polygraph examination. Excluding such evidence does not violate Jernigan’s Sixth Amendment right to present a defense, *United States v. Scheffer,*523 U.S. 303, 312, 118 S.Ct. 1261, 140 L.Ed.2d 413 (1998) (plurality), and the district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting the evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 403. *See United States v. Benavidez-Benavidez,*217 F.3d 720, 724-25 (9th Cir. 2000), *cert, denied,*531 U.S. 903, 121 S.Ct. 242, 148 L.Ed.2d 174 (2000).

Further, the district court did not err in denying Jernigan’s motion for a new trial based on the prosecutor’s arguments in rebuttal. The prosecutor’s statements that Jernigan never “established” or “showed” facts related to the eyewitness testimony did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof to Jernigan; rather, they were appropriate responses to defense *129counsel’s closing argument. *See United States v. Sayetsitty,*107 F.3d 1405, 1409-10 (9th Cir.1997). The prosecutor’s characterization of Elizabeth Chlupsa’s testimony was also a proper response to defense counsel’s argument, and it did not constitute vouching. *See United States v. Necoechea,*986 F.2d 1273, 1276-80 (9th Cir.1993).

Finally, sufficient evidence supported the finding that a gun was used in the bank robbery. Chlupsa testified that she saw a gun, and she explained the reasons why she believed that the gun was real. Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the government, a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt that Jernigan used a gun in the bank robbery. *See Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Equivalent of Birds
Eye Foods, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 25, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Earl L. Powers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

      Date: May 5, 2006                       /s/ Earl L. Powers
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer and
                                              Secretary
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7346 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7346

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 2020 recovery 
        rebates to certain individuals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2020

 Mr. Diaz-Balart introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 2020 recovery 
        rebates to certain individuals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2020 RECOVERY REBATE FOR CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 6428(g) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Special rule for certain spouses.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Paragraph (1)(B) shall not apply 
                in the case where at least 1 spouse satisfies paragraph 
                (1)(A).
                    ``(B) Recovery rebate amount.--In the case of 
                individuals filing a joint return with respect to 
                subparagraph (A), the amount of the credit allowed by 
                subsection (a)(1) shall be equal to the sum of 
                $1200.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made under this section shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of Public Law 116-136.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,212,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,048,194
<PP&E>                                         246,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,249,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          456,264
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         45
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,793,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,249,622
<SALES>                                         15,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,678,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,252,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,916,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,916,420)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,678,845)<F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.35)
<FN>
<F1>Net Loss of $15,678,845 includes a Beneficial Conversion Feature of Series B
Preferred Stock of $8,762,425.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

BJ Services Company

4601 Westway Park Blvd

Houston, Texas 77041

November 29,
2007

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street,
N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20549-0405



|Re: | CEO/CFO Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------

| | As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BJ Services Company (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.W. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                             
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ J.W. Stewart                                            
|    |  | J. W. Stewart                                               
|    |  | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | November 29, 2007
#### Johnny NELOMS and Rudolph Bell, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. *T-407.*

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 10, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,043
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      999
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                        990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,213
<PP&E>                                          29,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  75,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,219
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    75,830
<SALES>                                         32,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,562
<CGS>                                           22,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,425
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,376
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,376
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15
        

</TABLE>
WEISS, PECK & GREER
                                  MUTUAL FUNDS

                                                                    July 9, 1998

Dear Shareholder:

     Several weeks ago, we mailed to you proxy information so that you could
vote on some important proposals that affect your fund. I am reminding you to
vote, if you haven't done so already. I've enclosed materials describing each
proposal and a proxy card to cast your vote.

                            YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.

     We need your vote before the fund's special meeting is held. As previously
explained, we believe the proposed transaction with Robeco Groep N.V. is very
much to the benefit of the shareholders. The proposals listed on the enclosed
proxy card have been carefully reviewed by the fund's Board of Trustees, which
is responsible for protecting your interests as a shareholder. The Board
believes that these proposals are fair and reasonable, and it recommends that
you approve them.

                       VOTING BY MAIL IS QUICK AND EASY.
                        EVERYTHING YOU NEED IS ENCLOSED.

     You are entitled to one vote for each share you own. To cast your ballot,
simply record your vote on the enclosed proxy card. Be sure to sign the card
before mailing it in the postage-paid envelope provided. If you have any
questions before you vote, please call us at 800-223-3332. We'll be glad to help
you get your vote in quickly. Thank you for your participation in this important
initiative.


                                           Sincerely,

                                           /s/ Roger J. Weiss
                                           Roger J. Weiss
                                           Chairman of the Boards of Trustees


P.S.  Your vote is extremely important, no matter how many shares you own.
No. 99-1994.

#### Nevada et al. *v.*Hicks et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, *ante,*p. 923.] Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae*and for divided argument granted.
THERIAULT EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT
 AGREEMENT GOLD RUN INC. BRION THERIAULT
 W I T N E S S E T H
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 Employment and Term
  provided
 Duties
  1


Base Salary
 Expenses
 Termination of Employment
     2


provided  that
 3


Theriault Undertaking
  Stock or Option Plan
 Confidential Information
 Construction and Enforcement of
Section 9
 4


Release upon Termination or
Expiration
 Entire Agreement; Amendment
 Notices
  
  
 5


Assignability
 Captions; Sections
 Governing Law
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF
 GOLD RUN INC.By:
     /s/ John PritchardJohn Pritchard, CEO/s/ Brion TheriaultBRION THERIAULT
 6
adaiah_ex106.htm


EXHIBIT 10.6







Adaiah Distribution Inc.


Subscription Agreement


 


Dear Sirs:







The undersigned (the "Purchaser") acknowledges that I have received and reviewed the Prospectus of Adaiah Distribution Inc., dated__________ 2013.







Concurrent with execution of this Agreement, the Purchaser is purchasing _____________________ (_______) shares of Common Stock of Adaiah Distribution Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") at a price of $0.04 per Share (the "Subscription Price").  Purchaser hereby confirms the subscription for and purchase of said number of shares and hereby agrees to pay herewith the Subscription Price for such Shares.







Purchaser further confirms that Nikolay Titov solicited him/her/it to purchase the shares of Common Stock of the Company and no other person participated in such solicitation other than such person.


 


MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: Adaiah Distribution Inc.


 


Executed this _____ day of ___________________, 2013.







_________________________________       __________________________________


Signature of Purchaser







____________________________________


Address of Purchaser







____________________________________


Printed Name of Purchaser







PLEASE ENSURE FUNDS ARE IN US DOLLARS







______________________________      X   $0.04 =  US$ _____________________


Number of Shares Purchased                                              Total Subscription Price







Form of Payment: Cash:_____ Check #: _________________Other: _______________


 


Accepted by Adaiah Distribution Inc.


 


By: ____________________________________


 


Nikolay Titov, President