48090 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

TABLE 1 TO SUBPART III OF PART 63—APPLICABILITY OF GENERAL PROVISIONS (40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART A) TO

SUBPART III 

Subpart A reference Applies to subpart III Comment 

*******

§ 63.6(e)(1)(i) .................. NO ....................................... See § 63.1290(d)(4) for general duty requirement. 

§ 63.6(e)(1)(ii) .................. NO .......................................

§ 63.6(e)(1)(iii) ................. YES .....................................

§ 63.6(e)(2)–(3) ............... NO .......................................

§ 63.6(f)(1) ....................... NO .......................................

§ 63.6(f)(2)–(3) ................ YES .....................................

§ 63.6(g) .......................... YES .....................................

*******

§ 63.10(a) ........................ YES .....................................

§ 63.10(b)(1) .................... YES .....................................

§ 63.10(b)(2)(i) ................ NO .......................................

§ 63.10(b)(2)(ii) ................ NO ....................................... See § 63.1307(h) for recordkeeping of (1) date, time and duration; (2) listing of affected source or equipment and an estimate of the volume of each regulated pollutant emitted over the standard; and (3) actions to minimize emissions and any actions taken at the discretion of the owner or operator to prevent recurrence of the 

failure to meet an applicable requirement. 

§ 63.10(b)(2)(iii) ............... YES .....................................

§ 63.10(b)(2)(iv)–(xi) ........ NO .......................................

§ 63.10(b)(2)(xii) .............. YES .....................................

§ 63.10(b)(2)(xiii) ............. NO .......................................

§ 63.10(b)(2)(xiv) ............. YES .....................................

§ 63.10(b)(3) .................... YES .....................................

*******

§ 63.10(d)(4) .................... YES .....................................

§ 63.10(d)(5) .................... NO ....................................... See § 63.1306(f) for malfunction reporting requirements. 

* * * * * * * 

Table 3 to Subpart III of Part 63 

[Redesignated as Table 2 to Subpart III 

of Part 63] 

■ 21. Redesignate Table 3 to Subpart III 

of Part 63 as Table 2 to Subpart III of 

Part 63 and amend newly redesignated 

Table 2 by: 

■ a. Revising the heading; 

■ b. Removing entries for HAP ABA 

storage vessels § 63.1295, HAP ABA 

pumps § 63.1296(a), HAP ABA valves 

§ 63.1296(b), HAP ABA connectors 

§ 63.1296(c), Pressure relief devices 

§ 63.1296(d), Open-ended valves or 

lines § 63.1296(e), and Production line 

§ 63.1297; and 

■ c. Adding an entry for ABAs 

§ 63.1297. 

The revision and addition read as 

follows: 

TABLE 2 TO SUBPART III OF PART 63—COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR SLABSTOCK FOAM PRODUCTION AFFECTED

SOURCES

Emission point 

Emission point 

compliance 

option 

Emission, work 

practice, and 

equipment 

standards 

Monitoring Recordkeeping Reporting 

*******

ABAs § 63.1297 ................................................ N/A § 63.1297 ............................ § 63.1307(e) ............................

Table 4 to Subpart III of Part 63 

[Removed] 

■ 22. Remove Table 4 to Subpart III of 

Part 63. 

Table 5 to Subpart III of Part 63 

[Redesignated as Table 3 to Subpart III 

of Part 63] 

■ 23. Redesignate Table 5 to Subpart III 

of Part 63 as Table 3 to Subpart III of 

Part 63 and amend newly redesignated 

Table 3 by revising the heading to read 

as follows: 

Table 3 to Subpart III of Part 63— 

Compliance Requirements for Molded 

and Rebond Foam Production Affected 

Sources 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–18734 Filed 8–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0444; FRL–9909–83] 

Sweet Orange Peel Tincture; 

Exemption From the Requirement of a 

Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 48091 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of sweet orange 

peel tincture when used as an inert 

ingredient not to exceed 10% (weight/ 

weight) in pesticide formulations for use 

as a surfactant, fragrance, and adjuvant 

on all pre- and post-harvest food 

commodities. This regulation eliminates 

the need to establish a maximum 

permissible level for residues of sweet 

orange peel tincture. 

DATES: This regulation is effective 

August 15, 2014. Objections and 

requests for hearings must be received 

on or before October 14, 2014, and must 

be filed in accordance with the 

instructions provided in 40 CFR part 

178 (see also Unit I.C. of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2013–0444, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West 

Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The 

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois 

Rossi, Registration Division (7505P), 

Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; telephone number: 

(703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 

through the Government Printing 

Office’s e-CFR site at http://

www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/

40tab_02.tpl. 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2013–0444 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

before October 14, 2014. Addresses for 

mail and hand delivery of objections 

and hearing requests are provided in 40 

CFR 178.25(b). 

In addition to filing an objection or 

hearing request with the Hearing Clerk 

as described in 40 CFR part 178, please 

submit a copy of the filing (excluding 

any Confidential Business Information 

(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. 

Information not marked confidential 

pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be 

disclosed publicly by EPA without prior 

notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your 

objection or hearing request, identified 

by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP– 

2013–0444, by one of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be CBI or 

other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm. 

Additional instructions on commenting 

or visiting the docket, along with more 

information about dockets generally, is 

available at http://www.epa.gov/

dockets. 

II. Petition for Exemption 

In the Federal Register of July 19, 

2013 (78 FR 43117) (FRL–9392–9), EPA 

issued a document pursuant to FFDCA 

section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a, announcing 

the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN– 

10547) by AG-Chem Consulting (12208 

Quinque Lane, Clifton VA 21024), on 

behalf of Oro-Agri, Inc., 990 Trophy 

Club Drive, Trophy Club, TX 76262. The 

petition requested that 40 CFR 180.910 

be amended by establishing an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of sweet orange 

peel tincture when used as an inert 

ingredient when used as a surfactant, 

fragrance and adjuvant up to 10% 

(weight/weight) concentration in 

pesticide products applied to all preand post-harvest food commodities. 

That document referenced a summary of 

the petition prepared by AG-Chem 

Consulting, the petitioner, which is 

available in the docket, http://

www.regulations.gov. There were no 

comments received in response to the 

notice of filing. 

III. Inert Ingredient Definition 

Inert ingredients are all ingredients 

that are not active ingredients as defined 

in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are 

not limited to, the following types of 

ingredients (except when they have a 

pesticidal efficacy of their own): 

Solvents such as alcohols and 

hydrocarbons; surfactants such as 

polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty 

acids; carriers such as clay and 

diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as 

carrageenan and modified cellulose; 

wetting, spreading, and dispersing 

agents; propellants in aerosol 

dispensers; microencapsulating agents; 

and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not 

intended to imply nontoxicity; the 

ingredient may or may not be 

chemically active. Generally, EPA has 

exempted inert ingredients from the 

requirement of a tolerance based on the 

low toxicity of the individual inert 

ingredients. 

IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and 

Determination of Safety 

Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA 

allows EPA to establish an exemption 

from the requirement for a tolerance (the 

legal limit for a pesticide chemical 

residue in or on a food) only if EPA 

determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’ 

Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA 

defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

pesticide chemical residue, including 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
48092 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

all anticipated dietary exposures and all 

other exposures for which there is 

reliable information.’’ This includes 

exposure through drinking water and in 

residential settings, but does not include 

occupational exposure. Section 

408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to 

give special consideration to exposure 

of infants and children to the pesticide 

chemical residue in establishing a 

tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to infants and children from 

aggregate exposure to the pesticide 

chemical residue. . . .’’ 

EPA establishes exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance only in those 

cases where it can be clearly 

demonstrated that the risks from 

aggregate exposure to pesticide 

chemical residues under reasonably 

foreseeable circumstances will pose no 

appreciable risks to human health. In 

order to determine the risks from 

aggregate exposure to pesticide inert 

ingredients, the Agency considers the 

toxicity of the inert in conjunction with 

possible exposure to residues of the 

inert ingredient through food, drinking 

water, and through other exposures that 

occur as a result of pesticide use in 

residential settings. If EPA is able to 

determine that a finite tolerance is not 

necessary to ensure that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result from aggregate exposure to the 

inert ingredient, an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance may be 

established. 

Consistent with FFDCA section 

408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in 

FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has 

reviewed the available scientific data 

and other relevant information in 

support of this action. EPA has 

sufficient data to assess the hazards of 

and to make a determination on 

aggregate exposure for sweet orange peel 

tincture including exposure resulting 

from the exemption established by this 

action. EPA’s assessment of exposures 

and risks associated with sweet orange 

peel tincture follows. 

A. Toxicological Profile 

EPA has evaluated the available 

toxicity data and considered their 

validity, completeness, and reliability as 

well as the relationship of the results of 

the studies to human risk. EPA has also 

considered available information 

concerning the variability of the 

sensitivities of major identifiable 

subgroups of consumers, including 

infants and children. Specific 

information on the studies received and 

the nature of the adverse effects caused 

by sweet orange peel tincture as well as 

the no-observed-adverse-effect-level 

(NOAEL) and the lowest-observedadverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the 

toxicity studies are discussed in this 

unit. 

Sweet orange peel tincture and sweet 

orange peel oil are chemically the same 

(EINECS No. 232–433–8; CAS 8028–48– 

6). The only difference is the method of 

extraction. Sweet orange peel tincture is 

extracted in alcohol and the extraction 

process leads to the formation of a 

‘‘tincture’’. Sweet orange peel oil is 

extracted by cold press expression. Both 

are extracted from the same plant, Citrus 

sinensis family Rutaceae. Both forms of 

the sweet orange peel extract contain dlimonene as its primary component 

(>90%) and lesser amounts of myrcene. 

The EPA has conducted a ‘‘ScreeningLevel Hazard Assessment’’ of a class of 

compounds called monoterpene 

hydrocarbons, d-limonene and myrcene 

are among the monoterpene 

hyrdrocarbons assessed. The chemical 

class was ‘‘based on structural 

similarity, similar molecular weights 

and functional groups and the 

expectation that inherent 

physicochemical, environmental and 

toxicological properties are predicted to 

be similar’’. That analysis also included 

a review of data on sweet orange peel 

oil since it is a complex mixture 

containing greater than 90% 

monoterpene hydrocarbons (including 

d-limonene and myrcene), and is 

expected to have ‘‘physicochemical, 

environmental and toxicological 

properties similar to the major 

components . . . limonene and 

myrcene’’. Therefore, the Agency 

assessed the potential toxicity of sweet 

orange peel tincture based on the 

available toxicity data for sweet orange 

peel oil, and where data for sweet 

orange peel oil is missing, relied upon 

available data for the monoterpene 

hydrocarbons chemical class. 

The acute oral and dermal toxicity of 

sweet orange peel oil is low. The oral 

LD50 was >5,000 milligram/kilogram 

(mg/kg) in rats and rabbits, respectively. 

In a 28-day study with sweet orange 

peel oil, lesions in the non-glandular 

stomach and clinical chemistry were 

observed at 1,500 mg/kg/day (above the 

limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day) in rats. 

Lesions in the non-glandular stomach is 

attributed to the irritating property of 

the chemical. The NOAEL was 600 mg/ 

kg/day. 

In a combined reproductive/

developmental toxicity screening test 

with sweet orange peel oil, stillbirths 

and pup mortality were observed at 

1,500 mg/kg/day. The offspring NOAEL 

was 750 mg/kg/day. Signs of toxicity 

were not observed in maternal rats, the 

NOAEL was 1,500 mg/kg/day. 

Evidence of mutagenicity was not 

observed in the Ames test. Although 

evidence of mutagenicity was observed 

in mouse lymphoma assay, it was noted 

that cytotoxic concentrations were not 

reported and this could contribute to an 

inflated mutation rate. In addition, dlimonene was not mutagenic in an 

Ames test, mouse lymphoma, sister 

chromatid exchange nor in chromosome 

aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary 

cells assays. Therefore, based on the 

weight of evidence sweet orange peel 

tincture is not expected to be mutagenic. 

Evidence of immunotoxicity was not 

observed. Sweet orange peel oil 

exhibited no effects on cell-mediated or 

humoral immune response at doses up 

to 2,500 mg/kg/day in a plaque-forming 

cell assay in mice. 

Although a carcinogenicity study was 

not available for sweet orange peel 

tincture, carcinogenicity studies were 

available in the rat and mouse for dlimonene. An increased incidence of 

tumor formation was not observed in a 

2 year carcinogenicity study on female 

rats or in male and female mice treated 

with d-limonene up to 1,000 mg/kg/day. 

An increased incidence of tubular cell 

hyperplasia, adenomas, and 

adenocarcinomas of the kidney was 

observed in the male rat. However, these 

lesions are related to the accumulation 

of the alpha 2u-globulin protein which 

is specific to the male rat and is not 

relevant for human risk assessment. 

Based on this available information and 

the data supporting EPA’s conclusion 

that sweet orange peel tincture is not 

expected to be mutagenic, EPA 

concludes that sweet orange peel 

tincture is not likely to be carcinogenic. 

B. Toxicological Points of Departure/

Levels of Concern 

The available toxicity studies indicate 

that sweet orange peel tincture has low 

toxicity. Since no endpoint of concern 

was identified for sweet orange peel 

tincture, a qualitative risk assessment is 

appropriate. 

C. Exposure Assessment 

1. Dietary exposure from food and 

feed uses. In evaluating dietary 

exposure to sweet orange peel tincture, 

EPA considered exposure under the 

proposed exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance (40 CFR 

180.910 as an inert ingredient used in 

pesticide formulations applied to 

growing crops). EPA assessed dietary 

exposures from sweet orange peel 

tincture in food as follows: 

Dietary exposure can occur from 

eating foods containing residues of 

sweet orange peel tincture. Because no 

hazard endpoint of concern was 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 48093 

identified for the acute and chronic 

dietary assessment (food and drinking 

water), a quantitative dietary exposure 

risk assessment was not conducted. 

2. Dietary exposure from drinking 

water. Sweet orange peel tincture 

residues may be found in drinking 

water. However, since an endpoint of 

concern was not identified for the 

dietary assessment (food and drinking 

water), a quantitative dietary exposure 

risk assessment was not conducted. 

3. From non-dietary exposure. The 

term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in 

this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure 

(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), 

carpets, swimming pools, and hard 

surface disinfection on walls, floors, 

tables). Sweet orange peel tincture is 

used as an inert ingredient in pesticide 

products that could result in short- and 

intermediate-term residential exposure. 

However, based on the lack of toxicity, 

a quantitative exposure assessment from 

residential exposures was not 

performed. 

4. Cumulative effects from substances 

with a common mechanism of toxicity. 

Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA 

requires that, when considering whether 

to establish, modify, or revoke a 

tolerance, the Agency consider 

‘‘available information’’ concerning the 

cumulative effects of a particular 

pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other 

substances that have a common 

mechanism of toxicity.’’ 

EPA has not found sweet orange peel 

tincture to share a common mechanism 

of toxicity with any other substances 

and sweet orange peel tincture does not 

appear to produce a toxic metabolite 

produced by other substances. For the 

purposes of this tolerance action, 

therefore, EPA has assumed that sweet 

orange peel tincture does not have a 

common mechanism of toxicity with 

other substances. For information 

regarding EPA’s efforts to determine 

which chemicals have a common 

mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate 

the cumulative effects of such 

chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at 

http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/

cumulative. 

D. Safety Factor for Infants and 

Children 

Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA 

provides that EPA shall apply an 

additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety 

for infants and children in the case of 

threshold effects to account for prenatal 

and postnatal toxicity and the 

completeness of the database on toxicity 

and exposure unless EPA determines 

based on reliable data that a different 

margin of safety will be safe for infants 

and children. This additional margin of 

safety is commonly referred to as the 

Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) 

Safety Factor (SF). In applying this 

provision, EPA either retains the default 

value of 10X, or uses a different 

additional safety factor when reliable 

data available to EPA support the choice 

of a different factor. 

Based on an assessment of sweet 

orange peel oil, EPA has concluded that 

there are no toxicological endpoints of 

concern for the U.S. population, 

including infants and children, and has 

conducted a qualitative assessment. As 

part of its qualitative assessment, the 

Agency did not use safety factors for 

assessing risk, and no additional safety 

factor is needed for assessing risk to 

infants and children. 

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of 

Safety 

EPA determines whether acute and 

chronic dietary pesticide exposures are 

safe by comparing aggregate exposure 

estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and 

chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer 

risks, EPA calculates the lifetime 

probability of acquiring cancer given the 

estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, 

intermediate-, and chronic-term risks 

are evaluated by comparing the 

estimated aggregate food, water, and 

residential exposure to the appropriate 

point of departure (PODs) to ensure that 

an adequate MOE exists. 

Based on the lack of any endpoints of 

concern, EPA concludes that there is a 

reasonable certainty that no harm will 

result to the general population or to 

infants and children from aggregate 

exposure to sweet orange peel tincture 

residues. 

V. Other Considerations 

An analytical method is not required 

for enforcement purposes since the 

Agency is establishing an exemption 

from the requirement of a tolerance 

without any numerical limitation. 

VI. Conclusions 

Therefore, an exemption from the 

requirement of a tolerance is established 

under 40 CFR 180.910 for sweet orange 

peel tincture (CAS Reg. No. 8028–48–6) 

when used as an inert ingredient in 

pesticide formulations for use as a 

surfactant, fragrance and adjuvant up to 

10% (weight/weight) on all pre- and 

post-harvest food commodities. 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

This final rule establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) 

in response to a petition submitted to 

the Agency. The Office of Management 

and Budget (OMB) has exempted these 

types of actions from review under 

Executive Order 12866, entitled 

‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 

FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because 

this final rule has been exempted from 

review under Executive Order 12866, 

this final rule is not subject to Executive 

Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, 

entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). 

This final rule does not contain any 

information collections subject to OMB 

approval under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 

seq.), nor does it require any special 

considerations under Executive Order 

12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to 

Address Environmental Justice in 

Minority Populations and Low-Income 

Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 

1994). 

Since tolerances and exemptions that 

are established on the basis of a petition 

under FFDCA section 408(d), such as 

the exemption to the requirement of a 

tolerance in this final rule, do not 

require the issuance of a proposed rule, 

the requirements of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 

seq.), do not apply. 

This final rule directly regulates 

growers, food processors, food handlers, 

and food retailers, not States or tribes, 

nor does this action alter the 

relationships or distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

Congress in the preemption provisions 

of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, 

the Agency has determined that this 

action will not have a substantial direct 

effect on States or tribal governments, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States or tribal 

governments, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government or between 

the Federal Government and Indian 

Tribes. Thus, the Agency has 

determined that Executive Order 13132, 

entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 

13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 

9, 2000) do not apply to this final rule. 

In addition, this final rule does not 

impose any enforceable duty or contain 

any unfunded mandate as described 

under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 

1501 et seq.). 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES
48094 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

This action does not involve any 

technical standards that would require 

Agency consideration of voluntary 

consensus standards pursuant to section 

12(d) of the National Technology 

Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 

(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). 

VIII. Congressional Review Act 

Pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will 

submit a report containing this rule and 

other required information to the U.S. 

Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. This action is not a ‘‘major 

rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Agricultural commodities, Pesticides 

and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: August 7, 2014. 

Lois Rossi, 

Director, Registration Division, Office of 

Pesticide Programs. 

Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is 

amended as follows: 

PART 180—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 180 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 

■ 2. In § 180.910, the table is amended 

by alphabetically adding entry for 

‘‘Sweet orange peel tincture * * *’’ 

after the entry for ‘‘Sulfuric acid * * * 

’’ to read as follows: 

§ 180.910 Inert ingredients used pre- and 

post-harvest; exemptions from the 

requirement of a tolerance. 

* * * * * 

Pesticide chemical Limits Uses 

*******

Sweet orange peel tincture (CAS 

Reg. No. 8028–48–6).

Not to exceed 10% (weight/weight) in pesticide formulation ................. Surfactant, fragrance, related adjuvants of surfactants. 

* * * * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–19450 Filed 8–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 14–1064; MB Docket No. 08–243; RM– 

11490] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; 

Charlotte Amalie and Christiansted, 

Virgin Islands, and Culebra, Puerto 

Rico. 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; denial of petition for 

reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: This document denies the 

Petition for Reconsideration filed by 

OCC Acquisitions, Inc. First, we reject 

OCC Acquisitions, Inc.’s argument that 

La Mas Z Radio Corporation’s 

expression of interest for vacant 

Channel 237B at Charlotte Amalie, 

Virgin Islands is a sham. Next, we 

dismiss as procedurally defective OCC 

Acquisitions, Inc.’s argument that we 

should have considered the option of 

retaining vacant Channel 271B at 

Charlotte Amalie and adding Channel 

237B at that community because this 

allotment scheme is preferable to the 

substitution of Channel 237B for 

Channel 271B at Charlotte Amalie and 

grant of the Station WNVE(FM) 

Application. Finally, we conclude that 

no error was committed in this case by 

placing the reimbursement 

responsibility on the ultimate permittee 

of Channel 237B at Charlotte Amalie, 

Virgin Islands. 

DATES: August 15, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s 

Memorandum Opinion and Order, MB 

Docket No. 08–243, adopted July 24, 

2014, and released July 25, 2014. The 

full text of this Commission decision is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

Commission’s Reference Center 445 

12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. 

The complete text of this decision may 

also be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20054, telephone 1– 

800–378–3160 or www.BCPIWEB.com. 

This document is not subject to the 

Congressional Review Act. (The 

Commission is, therefore, not required 

to submit a copy of this Memorandum 

Opinion and Order to the General 

Accounting Office pursuant to the 

Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 

801(a)(1)(A), because the Petition for 

Reconsideration was denied. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Peter H. Doyle, 

Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2014–19411 Filed 8–14–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 13–284; RM–11704; DA 14– 

1058] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Evart 

and Ludington, Michigan 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Audio Division, at the 

request of Synergy Lakeshore Licenses, 

LLC, deletes vacant Channel 274A at 

Evart and modifies WGHN, Inc.’s 

construction permit from Channel 249A 

to Channel 242A at Ludington. We also 

modify Stations WMOM(FM), 

Pentwater, Michigan from Channel 

242A to Channel 274A and WMLQ(FM), 

Manistee, Michigan from Channel 282A 

to Channel 249A. The Media Bureau’s 

Consolidated Data Base System (CDBS) 

will reflect the reserved channel 

assignments for Station WMOM(FM) 

and Station WMLQ(FM). See 

Supplementary Information. 

DATES: Effective September 8, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with RULES