54572 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 177 / Friday, September 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

special conditions are adopted as 

proposed. 

Applicability 

As discussed above, these special 

conditions are applicable to the Model 

BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 series 

airplanes. Should Bombardier 

Aerospace apply at a later date for a 

change to the type certificate to include 

another model incorporating the same 

novel or unusual design feature, the 

special conditions would apply to that 

model as well. 

Conclusion 

This action affects only certain novel 

or unusual design features on two 

model series of airplanes. It is not a rule 

of general applicability. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

■ Accordingly, pursuant to the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the following special conditions are 

issued as part of the type certification 

basis for Bombardier Aerospace Models 

BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11 

(CSeries) airplanes. 

Automatic Speed Protection for Design 

Dive Speed 

1. In lieu of compliance with 

§ 25.335(b)(1), if the flight control 

system includes functions that act 

automatically to initiate recovery before 

the end of the 20-second period 

specified in § 25.335(b)(1), VD/MD must 

be determined from the greater of the 

speeds resulting from conditions (a) and 

(b) below. The speed increase occurring 

in these maneuvers may be calculated, 

if reliable or conservative aerodynamic 

data are used. 

(a) From an initial condition of 

stabilized flight at VC/MC, the airplane 

is upset so as to take up a new flight 

path 7.5 degrees below the initial path. 

Control application, up to full authority, 

is made to try and maintain this new 

flight path. Twenty seconds after 

initiating the upset, manual recovery is 

made at a load factor of 1.5g (0.5g 

acceleration increment), or such greater 

load factor that is automatically applied 

by the system with the pilot’s pitch 

control neutral. Power, as specified in 

§ 25.175(b)(1)(iv), is assumed until 

recovery is initiated, at which time 

power reduction and the use of pilotcontrolled drag devices may be used. 

(b) From a speed below VC/MC, with 

power to maintain stabilized level flight 

at this speed, the airplane is upset so as 

to accelerate through VC/MC at a flight 

path 15 degrees below the initial path 

(or at the steepest nose down attitude 

that the system will permit with full 

control authority if less than 15 

degrees). The pilot’s controls may be in 

the neutral position after reaching VC/

MC and before recovery is initiated. 

Recovery may be initiated three seconds 

after operation of the high-speed 

warning system by application of a load 

of 1.5g (0.5g acceleration increment), or 

such greater load factor that is 

automatically applied by the system 

with the pilot’s pitch control neutral. 

Power may be reduced simultaneously. 

All other means of decelerating the 

airplane, the use of which is authorized 

up to the highest speed reached in the 

maneuver, may be used. The interval 

between successive pilot actions must 

not be less than one second. 

2. The applicant must also 

demonstrate that the speed margin, 

established as above, will not be 

exceeded in inadvertent or gust-induced 

upsets resulting in initiation of the dive 

from non-symmetric attitudes, unless 

the airplane is protected by the flight 

control laws from getting into nonsymmetric upset conditions. The upset 

maneuvers described in Advisory 

Circular 25–7C, Flight Test Guide for 

Certification of Transport Category 

Airplanes, section 8, paragraph 32, subparagraphs c(3)(a) and (b) may be used 

to comply with this requirement. 

3. The probability of any failure of the 

high-speed protection system that 

would result in an airspeed exceeding 

those determined by paragraphs 1 and 2 

must be less than 10¥5 per flight hour. 

4. Failures of the system must be 

annunciated to the pilots. Flight manual 

instructions must be provided that 

reduce the maximum operating speeds, 

VMO/MMO. With the system failed, the 

operating speed must be reduced to a 

value that maintains a speed margin 

between VMO/MMO and VD/MD that is 

consistent with showing compliance 

with § 25.335(b) without the benefit of 

the high-speed protection system. 

5. Dispatch of the airplane with the 

high-speed protection system 

inoperative could be allowed under an 

approved minimum equipment list that 

would require flight manual 

instructions to indicate reduced 

maximum operating speeds, as 

described in paragraph (4). In addition, 

the flight deck display of the reduced 

operating speeds, as well as the 

overspeed warning for exceeding those 

speeds, must be equivalent to that of the 

normal airplane with the high-speed 

protection system operative. Also, it 

must be shown that no additional 

hazards are introduced with the highspeed protection system inoperative. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 3, 2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–21787 Filed 9–11–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0666; Notice No. 25– 

566–SC] 

Special Conditions: Bombardier 

Aerospace, Models BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A11 Series Airplanes; 

Isolation or Airplane Electronic System 

Security Protection From Unauthorized 

Internal Access 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: These special conditions are 

issued for the Bombardier Aerospace 

Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–500– 

1A11 series airplanes. These airplanes 

will have novel or unusual design 

features, specifically, digital systems 

architecture composed of several 

connected data networks that will have 

the capability to allow connectivity of 

the passenger service computer systems 

to the airplane critical systems and data 

networks. The applicable airworthiness 

regulations do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for this 

design feature. These special conditions 

contain the additional safety standards 

that the Administrator considers 

necessary to establish a level of safety 

equivalent to that established by the 

existing airworthiness standards. 

DATES: The effective date of these 

special conditions is September 12, 

2014. We must receive your comments 

by October 27, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified 

by docket number FAA–2014–0666 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow 

the online instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

• Mail: Send comments to Docket 

Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 177 / Friday, September 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 54573 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, 

DC, 20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take 

comments to Docket Operations in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except federal holidays. 

• Fax: Fax comments to Docket 

Operations at 202–493–2251. 

Privacy: The FAA will post all 

comments it receives, without change, 

to http://www.regulations.gov/, 

including any personal information the 

commenter provides. Using the search 

function of the docket Web site, anyone 

can find and read the electronic form of 

all comments received into any FAA 

docket, including the name of the 

individual sending the comment (or 

signing the comment for an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s 

complete Privacy Act Statement can be 

found in the Federal Register 

published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 

19477–19478), as well as at http:// 

DocketsInfo.dot.gov/. 

Docket: Background documents or 

comments received may be read at 

http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. 

Follow the online instructions for 

accessing the docket or go to the Docket 

Operations in Room W12–140 of the 

West Building Ground Floor at 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and 

Flight Crew Interface, ANM–111, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington, 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1298; facsimile 

425–227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

has determined that notice of, and 

opportunity for prior public comment 

on, these special conditions is 

impracticable because these procedures 

would significantly delay issuance of 

the design approval and thus delivery of 

the affected aircraft. In addition, the 

substance of these special conditions 

has been subject to the public comment 

process in several prior instances with 

no substantive comments received. The 

FAA therefore finds that good cause 

exists for making these special 

conditions effective upon publication in 

the Federal Register. 

Comments Invited 

We invite interested people to take 

part in this rulemaking by sending 

written comments, data, or views. The 

most helpful comments reference a 

specific portion of the special 

conditions, explain the reason for any 

recommended change, and include 

supporting data. 

We will consider all comments we 

receive by the closing date for 

comments. We may change these special 

conditions based on the comments we 

receive. 

Background 

On December 10, 2009, Bombardier 

Aerospace applied for a type certificate 

for their new Models BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A11 series airplanes (hereafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘CSeries’’). 

The CSeries airplanes are swept-wing 

monoplanes with an aluminum alloy 

fuselage sized for 5-abreast seating. 

Passenger capacity is designated as 110 

for the Model BD–500–1A10 and 125 for 

the Model BD–500–1A11. Maximum 

takeoff weight is 131,000 pounds for the 

Model BD–500–1A10 and 144,000 

pounds for the Model BD–500–1A11. 

Type Certification Basis 

Under the provisions of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, 

Bombardier Aerospace must show that 

the CSeries airplanes meet the 

applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 25 

as amended by Amendments 25–1 

through 25–129. 

If the Administrator finds that the 

applicable airworthiness regulations 

(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain 

adequate or appropriate safety standards 

for the CSeries airplanes because of a 

novel or unusual design feature, special 

conditions are prescribed under the 

provisions of § 21.16. 

Special conditions are initially 

applicable to the model for which they 

are issued. Should the type certificate 

for that model be amended later to 

include any other model that 

incorporates the same or similar novel 

or unusual design feature, the special 

conditions would also apply to the other 

model. 

In addition to the applicable 

airworthiness regulations and special 

conditions, the CSeries airplanes must 

comply with the fuel vent and exhaust 

emission requirements of 14 CFR part 

34 and the noise certification 

requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the 

FAA must issue a finding of regulatory 

adequacy under section 611 of Public 

Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 

1972.’’ 

The FAA issues special conditions, as 

defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance 

with § 11.38, and they become part of 

the type-certification basis under 

§ 21.17(a)(2). 

Novel or Unusual Design Features 

The CSeries will incorporate the 

following novel or unusual design 

features: Digital systems architecture 

composed of several connected data 

networks. This network architecture and 

configuration may be used for or 

interfaced with a diverse set of 

functions, including: 

• Flight safety related control, 

communication, and navigation systems 

(aircraft control domain); 

• Operation and administrative 

support (operator information services 

domain); and 

• Passenger information and 

entertainment systems (passenger 

entertainment domain), and will have 

the capability to allow access to or by 

external network sources. 

Discussion 

The CSeries digital systems network 

architecture is different from existing 

production (and retrofitted) airplanes as 

it allows new kinds of user access to 

previously isolated data networks 

connected to systems that perform 

functions required for the safe operation 

of the airplane. This proposed data 

network design and integration may 

result in security vulnerabilities from 

intentional or unintentional corruption 

of data and systems critical to the safety 

and maintenance of the airplane. 

The existing regulations and guidance 

material did not anticipate these types 

of system architectures or access to 

airplane systems. Furthermore, 14 CFR 

regulations and current system safety 

assessment policy and techniques do 

not address potential security 

vulnerabilities that could be caused by 

unauthorized access to airplane data 

busses and servers. Therefore, these 

special conditions are issued to ensure 

that the security, integrity, and 

availability of airplane systems are not 

compromised by certain wired or 

wireless electronic connections between 

airplane data busses and networks. 

Applicability 

As discussed above, these special 

conditions are applicable to the Model 

No. BD–500–1A10 and BD–500–1A11. 

Should Bombardier Aerospace apply at 

a later date for a change to the type 

certificate to include another model 

incorporating the same novel or unusual 

design feature, the special conditions 

would apply to that model as well. 

Conclusion 

This action affects only certain novel 

or unusual design features on two 

model series of airplanes. It is not a rule 

of general applicability. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

54574 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 177 / Friday, September 12, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

The substance of these special 

conditions has been subjected to the 

notice and comment period in several 

prior instances and has been derived 

without substantive change from those 

previously issued. It is unlikely that 

prior public comment would result in a 

significant change from the substance 

contained herein. Therefore, because a 

delay would significantly affect the 

certification of the airplane, which is 

imminent, the FAA has determined that 

prior public notice and comment are 

unnecessary and impracticable, and 

good cause exists for adopting these 

special conditions upon issuance. The 

FAA is requesting comments to allow 

interested persons to submit views that 

may not have been submitted in 

response to the prior opportunities for 

comment described above. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25 

Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

The authority citation for these 

special conditions is as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 

44702, 44704. 

The Special Conditions 

■ Accordingly, pursuant to the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the following special conditions are 

issued as part of the type certification 

basis for Bombardier BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A1 series airplanes. 

Isolation or Airplane Electronic System 

Security Protection From Unauthorized 

Internal Access 

1. The applicant must ensure that the 

design provides isolation from, or 

airplane electronic system security 

protection against, access by 

unauthorized sources internal to the 

airplane. The design must prevent 

inadvertent and malicious changes to, 

and all adverse impacts upon, airplane 

equipment, systems, networks, or other 

assets required for safe flight and 

operations. 

2. The applicant must establish 

appropriate procedures to allow the 

operator to ensure that continued 

airworthiness of the airplane is 

maintained, including all post type 

certification modifications that may 

have an impact on the approved 

electronic system security safeguards. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 3, 2014. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–21788 Filed 9–11–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0698; Notice No. 25– 

567–SC] 

Special Conditions: Bombardier 

Aerospace, Models BD–500–1A10 and 

BD–500–1A11 Series Airplanes; 

Airplane Electronic System Security 

Protection From Unauthorized External 

Access 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; request 

for comments. 

SUMMARY: These special conditions are 

issued for the Bombardier Aerospace 

Models BD–500–1A10 and BD–500– 

1A11 series airplanes. These airplanes 

will have novel or unusual design 

features, specifically, digital systems 

architecture composed of several 

connected networks that may allow 

access to or by external computer 

systems and networks and may result in 

security vulnerabilities to the airplanes’ 

systems. The applicable airworthiness 

regulations do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for these 

design features. These special 

conditions contain the additional safety 

standards that the Administrator 

considers necessary to establish a level 

of safety equivalent to that established 

by the existing airworthiness standards. 

DATES: The effective date of these 

special conditions is September 12, 

2014. We must receive your comments 

by October 27, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified 

by docket number FAA–2014–0698 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov/ and follow 

the online instructions for sending your 

comments electronically. 

• Mail: Send comments to Docket 

Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, 

DC, 20590–0001. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take 

comments to Docket Operations in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except federal holidays. 

• Fax: Fax comments to Docket 

Operations at 202–493–2251. 

Privacy: The FAA will post all 

comments it receives, without change, 

to http://www.regulations.gov/, 

including any personal information the 

commenter provides. Using the search 

function of the docket Web site, anyone 

can find and read the electronic form of 

all comments received into any FAA 

docket, including the name of the 

individual sending the comment (or 

signing the comment for an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). DOT’s 

complete Privacy Act Statement 

can be found in the Federal Register 

published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 

19477–19478), as well as at http://

DocketsInfo.dot.gov/. 

Docket: Background documents or 

comments received may be read at 

http://www.regulations.gov/ at any time. 

Follow the online instructions for 

accessing the docket or go to the Docket 

Operations in Room W12–140 of the 

West Building Ground Floor at 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and 

Flight Crew Interface, ANM–111, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1298; facsimile 

425–227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

has determined that notice of, and 

opportunity for prior public comment 

on, these special conditions is 

impracticable because these procedures 

would significantly delay issuance of 

the design approval and thus delivery of 

the affected aircraft. In addition, the 

substance of these special conditions 

has been subject to the public comment 

process in several prior instances with 

no substantive comments received. The 

FAA therefore finds that good cause 

exists for making these special 

conditions effective upon publication in 

the Federal Register. 

Comments Invited 

We invite interested people to take 

part in this rulemaking by sending 

written comments, data, or views. The 

most helpful comments reference a 

specific portion of the special 

conditions, explain the reason for any 

recommended change, and include 

supporting data. 

We will consider all comments we 

receive by the closing date for 

comments. We may change these special 

conditions based on the comments we 

receive. 

Background 

On December 10, 2009, Bombardier 

Aerospace applied for a type certificate 

for their new Models BD–500–1A10 and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES