alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME FROM DPL'S FIRST QUARTER 1999
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        1,953,839
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         66,673
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             397,233
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           256,691
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     237,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,911,923
<COMMON>                                                 2
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          528,893
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                333,491
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     862,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               70,000
<PREFERRED>                                         89,703
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               951,957
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       31,287
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         14,742
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    12,484
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     879,364
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    2,911,923
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          619,707
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                23,458
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         542,497
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         565,955
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             53,752
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   3,312
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      57,064
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            21,450
<NET-INCOME>                                        35,614
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          1,073
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       34,541
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            23,649
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           20,520
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              81,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                               

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68280-68281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-449-000]


COM/Energy Marketing, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

December 23, 1997.
    COM/Energy Marketing, Inc. (COM/Energy) filed an application to 
engage in the wholesale sale of electric capacity and energy at market-
based rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, 
COM/Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by COM/

[[Page 68281]]

Energy. On December 23, 1997, the Commission issued an Order Accepting 
For Filing Proposed Market-Based Rates (Order), or in the above-
docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's December 23, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (C) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
COM/Energy should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, COM/Energy is hereby authorized to issue 
securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of COM/Energy, compatible with the 
public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of COM/
Energy's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * * *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is January 22, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34117 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
AEE 2013 10-K-Exhibit 10.15




Exhibit 10.15




2014 BASE SALARY TABLE FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The 2014 annual base salaries of the following Named Executive Officers of Ameren Corporation (“Ameren”), Union Electric Company (“UE”) and Ameren Illinois Company (“AIC”) (which officers are  employed by Ameren and/or an Ameren subsidiary as of February 28, 2014, and were determined to the extent applicable by reference to the Ameren Proxy Statement and the UE and AIC Information Statements for the 2014 annual meetings of shareholders and by reference to the definition of “Named Executive Officer” in Item 402(a)(3) of SEC Regulation S-K) are as follows: 


	
				
	Name and Position at February 28, 2014
	2014 Base Salary
	


	Thomas R. Voss
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer – Ameren(1)


	

	$1,062,000
	


	Warner L. Baxter
President – Ameren(1) 
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer – UE


	$642,000(2)
	


	Martin J. Lyons, Jr.
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial 
     Officer – Ameren, UE and AIC 


	

	$566,500
	


	Charles D. Naslund
Executive Vice President – UE 


	

	$476,000
	


	Gregory L. Nelson
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and
     Secretary – Ameren, UE and AIC


	

	$453,500
	


	Daniel F. Cole
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer – Ameren Services Company 


	

	$427,000
	


	Richard J. Mark
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer – AIC


	

	$424,500
	


	Bruce A. Steinke
Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Accounting Officer – Ameren, UE and AIC


	

	$330,000
	





(1) On February 14, 2014, Mr. Voss advised the Ameren board of directors of his intention to retire from his position as President of Ameren, effective February 14, 2014, as Chief Executive Officer of Ameren, effective April 24, 2014, and as Chairman and member of the Ameren board, effective July 1, 2014. On February 14, 2014, Mr. Baxter succeeded Mr. Voss as President of Ameren and a member of the Ameren board. On April 24, 2014, Mr. Baxter will succeed Mr. Voss as Chief Executive Officer of Ameren. The Ameren board expects that Mr. Baxter will succeed Mr. Voss as Chairman of the Ameren board.
(2) Effective April 24, 2014, Mr. Baxter’s base salary will be increased from $642,000 to $950,000.
From: Larry Cooper [mailto:lcooper.huronairoort@rnidconetwork.comj

Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 12:21 PM

To: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

Cc: Chuck Howell

Subject: EAS service at Huron SD

r{ HI c,'> b 1\ o.!) 0

{;""l r~.J - l-, " t I

Sir, I understand that Great Lakes has requested that I give you an OK on their request to change our

service from MSP to DEN. We are aware of their need to institute this change and will accept it

providing that the connection with PIR does not affect our seat availability guaranteed by the

contract. We have had problems in the past with PIRtaking most if not all of available seats on this

route leaving none for our passengers. If this becomes a problem I would hope that it could be

addressed since the loss of MSP comes at a time when that service had created a positive impact on our

boarding numbers even though we still had the same seat availability problem due to the service

beginning in PIR. Thank you for your consideration and if you have any questions please feel free to

contact me at any time.

Larry E. Cooper

Manager

Huron Regional Airport

60S-353-8516

IcooDe r. hurona irDo rt@midconetwork.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-2000
<CASH>                                             269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (444)
<INVENTORY>                                     34,410
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,486
<PP&E>                                          16,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,975)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,247
<BONDS>                                        139,530
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,361
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,753
<SALES>                                        120,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,351
<CGS>                                           59,525
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   274
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,883)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       211
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,094)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,804
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (290)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LYNTON GROUP,
INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                 DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                           240,504
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  1,792,275
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                      962,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3,395,009
<PP&E>                        17,126,171
<DEPRECIATION>                 3,528,284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                23,262,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          6,892,888
<BONDS>                       16,418,570
<COMMON>                         588,653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                           30
<OTHER-SE>                     (637,668)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  23,262,473
<SALES>                        6,353,289
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               6,353,289
<CGS>                          5,030,559
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  5,924,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 211,747
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               389,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (172,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (172,790)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                   (172,790)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (.07)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

In the Matter of 

MeW ANE, INC., 

a corporation, and 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., 

a limited partnership, 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

DOCKET NO. 9351 

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING INITIAL DECISION 

PURSUANT TO COMMISSION RULE 3.51 

Commission Rule of Practice 3.51(a) provides that "[t]he Administrative Law Judge shall 

file an initial decision within 70 days after the filing of the last filed initial or reply proposed 

findings of fact, conclusions oflaw and order pursuant to§ 3.46." 16 C.F.R. § 3.51(a). The last 

reply proposed findings and conclusions and briefs were filed January 18, 2013. Pursuant to 

Rule 3.51, therefore, the Initial Decision would be filed on or before April1, 2013. Commission 

Rule 3.51(a) further provides that "[t]he Administrative Law Judge may extend [this time period] 

by up to 30 days for good cause." 16 C.F.R. § 3.51(a). 

The record requiring review and analysis in this matter is voluminous. Over 2,000 

exhibits were admitted. In addition, 53 witnesses testified, either live or by deposition, including 

two expert witnesses, and there are 6,045 pages oftrial transcript. The parties submitted 3,104 

proposed findings of fact (2,496 by Complaint Counsel and 608 by Respondents). The parties' 

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, replies to proposed findings of fact and 

conclusions oflaw, post-trial briefs, and reply briefs total 3,052 pages. 

Based on the foregoing, good cause exists to extend the deadline for filing the Initial 

Decision in this matter, by 30 days, to May 1, 2013. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 28, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         529,343
<SECURITIES>                                   53,906
<RECEIVABLES>                                  11,411,407
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,510,690
<INVENTORY>                                    3,180,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,449,665
<PP&E>                                         6,217,298
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,674,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,580,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,988,295
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,396
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,445,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,580,640
<SALES>                                        50,631,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               50,631,230
<CGS>                                          29,943,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  29,943,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               21,326,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,427,684
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             575,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,597,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (240,463)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,356,848)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,356,848)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.17)


</TABLE>
#### CITY OF CLEARWATER, a municipal corporation, Petitioner, v. Albert W. REEVES, Respondent.

No. 70-908.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
No. 10688.

#### The Cincinnati Traction Co. *v.*Miller, by etc.

Decided June 16, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Outcalt & Hickenlooper,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Hoffman, Bode &*Lc *Blond*and *Mr. B. JJ. Stites,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck, Crew and Davis, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Falcon Products,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 1, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Phillip J. Pacey, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date: June 15, 2004                 /s/ Phillip J. Pacey
                                    --------------------
                                    Phillip J. Pacey
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-245-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 21, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 14, 1997, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74101, filed in the above docket, 
a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212(a) and 157.216(b) of 
the Commission's Regulations, for authorization to relocate and replace 
the Heartland Cement Company (Heartland) meter and regulatory setting, 
and, after the relocation, to abandon by sale to Heartland 
approximately 950 feet of 6-inch lateral pipeline, all located in 
Montgomery County, Kansas, under the authorization issued to WNG in 
Docket No. CP82-479-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request which is file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    WNG states that the projected volume of delivery is not expected to 
exceed the current delivered volume. The estimated cost of construction 
is $56,154. WNG states that this change is not prohibited by an 
existing tariff and that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish the 
deliveries specified without detriment or disadvantage to its other 
customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity is deemed to be authorized 
effective on the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4803 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Taylor v. Crosby, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5820.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of De cisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2016-O HIO -5820 T AYLOR ET AL ., A PPELLEES , v. C ROSBY ET AL ., A PPELLANTS . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Taylor v. Crosby, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5820.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, and cause remanded to trial court for determ ination regarding compliance with 2006 version of Dormant Mineral Act

. (No. 2014-1886—Submitted August 31, 2016—Decided September 15, 2016.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County, No. 13 BE 32, 2014-Ohio-4433.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeal s is affirmed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5796, ___ N.E.3d ___, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio5793, ___ N.E.3d ___, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for aS UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 determination regarding compliance with the 2006 version of the Dormant Mineral Act. O’C ONNOR , C.J., and O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , and F RENCH , JJ.,

concur. P FEIFER , and O’N EILL , JJ., dissent.

_________________ Frizzi Law Offices and Daniel L. Frizzi Jr., for appellees Benjamin F. Taylor and Donald F. Taylor. Jividen Law Offices, P.L.L.C., David A. Jividen, and Chad C. Groome, for appellee Mary Lou Hutchins. Myser & Davies, Richard A. Myser, and Adam L. Myser, for appellants.

_________________