alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Rafael Francisco MORENO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-936.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Sept. 30, 1969.

Aram P. Goshgarian, Hialeah, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24 and cases cited therein.
#### Michael Jerome PAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 15, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Monticello 
Site

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Board Committee Meeting: Environmental Management 
Site-Specific Advisory Board, Monticello Site.

DATES AND TIMES: Tuesday, March 18, 1997, 7:00 p.m.-9:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: San Juan County Courthouse, 2nd Floor Conference Room, 117 
South Main, Monticello, Utah 84535.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Berry, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Department of Energy Grand Junction Projects Office, P.O. 
Box 2567, Grand Junction, CO 81502, (303) 248-7727.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to advise DOE and 
its regulators in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Update on repository status, scheduling for 
tailings haul beginning this spring, supplemental standards, reports 
from subcommittees on local training and hiring, health and safety, and 
future land use.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Audrey Berry's office at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests must be received 5 days prior 
to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Designated Federal Official is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of 5 minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585, between 9:00 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Audrey Berry, 
Department of Energy Grand Junction Projects Office, P.O. Box 2567, 
Grand Junction, CO 81502, or by calling her at (303) 248-7727.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 11, 1997.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3786 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JUAN RAMON CABEZAS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10138

D.C. No. 3:11-CR-00064-HDMWGC-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Howard D. McKibben, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 13, 2014** 

San Francisco, California

Before: D.W. NELSON, McKEOWN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Juan Cabezas (Cabezas) pled guilty to one count each of mail fraud, bank

fraud, tax evasion, money laundering, and aggravated identity theft, and received

four concurrent 63-month sentences followed by a 24-month sentence to be served

FILED

MAY 16 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
consecutively. Cabezas appeals the district court’s imposition of an abuse of trust

enhancement, the court’s alleged failure to address the need to avoid unwarranted

sentencing disparities under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6), and the court’s purported

reliance on unreliable victim statements during sentencing. We affirm. 

As Cabezas concedes, a factual and legal basis for the abuse of trust

enhancements exists. While his plea agreement did not contemplate the imposition

of this enhancement, the plea agreement was not binding on the court. Moreover,

the district court imposed a within-Guidelines sentence, and Cabezas had already

conceded that his Guidelines range fell within the neighborhood of sentences

imposed in similar cases. No further explanation was required under

18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(6). United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008)

(“A within-Guidelines sentence ordinarily needs little explanation . . . because both

the Commission and the sentencing judge have determined that the sentence

comports with the § 3553(a) factors and is appropriate in the ordinary case.”). 

Finally, regardless of whether the victims’ statements at sentencing were

unreliable, they do not provide a basis for vacating Cabezas’ sentence because they

were not “demonstrably made the basis for the sentence.” United States v. Ibarra,

737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir. 1984). Instead, the district court based Cabezas’

sentence on the amount of loss, Cabezas’ failure to stop embezzling money despite
an opportunity to walk away, the abuse of trust, and Cabezas’ payment of full

restitution.

AFFIRMED.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7465 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson 

statue and marble base in Lafayette Square in the District of Columbia, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to remove the Andrew Jackson statue and marble base in Lafayette 

Square in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Andrew Jackson Stat5 ue Removal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF ANDREW JACKSON STATUE. 

7 (a) REMOVAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

8 ensure that the Andrew Jackson statue and marble base 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7465 IH

1 is removed from Lafayette Square in the District of Co2 lumbia. 

3 (b) DONATION.—The Secretary shall donate the An4 drew Jackson statue and marble base to a museum or 

5 other similar entity. The recipient of the statue and base 

6 may not store, display, or exhibit the statue outside. If 

7 the statue is stored, displayed, or exhibited outside, owner8 ship of the statue and marble base will revert back to the 

9 Federal Government. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 39 (Thursday, February 27, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-1153-DR]


Nevada; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Nevada (FEMA-1153-DR), dated January 3, 1997, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 5, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, effective this 
date and pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency under Executive Order 12148, I 
hereby appoint Curt Musgrave of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of Warren Pugh as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
James L. Witt,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-4919 Filed 2-26-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry J. RUDOLPH and Rockwood Insurance Co.

No. 61020.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Rockwood Ins. Co. applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied and stay order recalled.

CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion that a writ should be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF FABRI-CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AS OF MAY 3, 1997
AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE THIRTEEN WEEKS THEN ENDED.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1997
<CASH>                                          12,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    295,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               318,296
<PP&E>                                         180,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 428,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,353
<BONDS>                                         76,583
<COMMON>                                         1,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     202,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   428,415
<SALES>                                        218,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,826
<CGS>                                          122,688
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,528
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,608
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4254]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Division 
of Extramural Activities; Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 11-12, 1997.
    Time: March 11, 12:00 p.m. to recess, March 12, 8:00 a.m. to 
adjournment.
    Place: Crystal City Courtyard Marriott, 2899 Jefferson Davis 
Highway, Arlington, VA 22202.
    Contact Person: Dr. Paul Sheehy, Scientific Review Branch, 
National Institutes of Health, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue, Room 9C10, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9223.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate two grant applications.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.853, Clinical 
Research Related to Neurological Disorders; No. 93.854, Biological 
Basis Research in the Neurosciences)

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 97-4254 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4416]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Special Medical Advisory Group, Notice of Availability of Annual 
Report

    Under Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory 
Committee Act), notice is hereby given that the Annual Report of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs Special Medical Advisory Group for 
Fiscal Year 1996 has been issued.
    The report summarizes activities of the Group relative to the care 
and treatment of disabled veterans and other matters pertinent to the 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. It is 
available for public inspection at two locations:

Federal Documents Section, Exchange and Gift Division, LM 632, Library 
of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540; and
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of the Under Secretary for 
Health, VA Central Office, Room 811, 810 Vermont Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20420.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.

    By Direction of the Secretary:
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4416 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John JACKSON v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, SEC. “B”, PARISH OF ORLEANS.

No. 61536.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: John Jackson applying for writs of mandamus, prohibition and other remedial writs. Orleans Parish.

Granted. The district judge is ordered to act on the attached application without delay.
#### FOX, GEORGE, LOEFFLER & DOWNEY, P.A., a Professional Association, Plaintiff, v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

No. 77-720.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 18, 1977.

Douglas J. Loeffler, of Fox, George, Loeffler & Downey, Clearwater, for plaintiff.

Charles P. Schropp, of Shackleford, Farri- or, Stallings & Evans, Tampa, for defendant.

BOARDMAN, Chief Judge.

The Honorable John S. Andrews, Circuit Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, has certified the following two questions to this court.

> 1. MAY AN ATTORNEY BRING AN INDEPENDENT ACTION FOR PAYMENT OF HIS FEES AGAINST AN ADVERSE PARTY IN A PRIOR ACTION WHO HAS MADE SETTLEMENT WITH THE ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE AND CONSENT OF THE ATTORNEY, BUT AFTER THE CLIENT HAS DISCHARGED THE ATTORNEY?

> 2. IF THE ANSWER TO QUESTION NUMBER 1 IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, MAY SUCH AN INDEPENDENT ACTION BE MAINTAINED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN ALLEGATION OF COLLUSION BETWEEN THE ATTORNEY’S CLIENT AND THE ADVERSE PARTY?

*1137Our research reveals persuasive authority in Florida which would resolve the issues presented to us, and we therefore decline to answer the certified questions. See Fla.R.App.P. 4.6(a)(b). See *Miller v. Scobie,*152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892 (1943); *State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.*v. *Ganz,*119 So.2d 319 (Fla.3d DCA 1960).

OTT, J., and McNULTY, JOSEPH P. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
Motion Granted; Order filed June 2 , 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00170

- CV

____________ BELINDA DAWN TIDWELL , Appellant

V.
JOHN ROBERSON AND GRIMES AND FERTITTA, P. C. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13

- 03

- 21887



### ORDER

This is an appeal from a turnover order signed December 7 , 201 5 . On June 1, 2016 , appellant filed a motion in this court requesting a stay of the enforcement of the judgment pending review of the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to stay judgment pending appeal or motion for approval of a supersedeas bond. Texas Rule of A ppellate Procedure 24.4(c) provides that in a review from the trial court’s supersedeas determination , an appellate court may “issue any temporary orders necessary to preserve the parties ’ rights .” Tex. R. App. P. 2 4.4(c)

.Appellant requests that we stay enforcement of the judgment until this court

can review the trial court’s decision on the motion for stay or approval of a supersedeas bond. It appears from the facts stated in the motion that appellant ’ s rights will be prejudiced unless immediate tempor ary relief is granted. Accordingly, we grant the motion and issue the following order.

We therefore ORDER that enforcement of the trial court’s judgment is stayed in trial court cause number 13

- 03

- 21887 , styled John Roberson and Grimes and Fertitta, P.C. v . Belinda Dawn Tidwell and Jennifer D. McCallum

. Enforcement of the judgment is stayed until further orders of this court. Appellees are requested to file a response to appellant’s motion on or before June 17, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

SUBSIDIARIES 

Adept Technology, S.A.R.L., a French corporation 

Adept Technology International Ltd., a California corporation 

Adept Technology GmbH, a German corporation 

Adept Global Technologies, a Cayman company

Adept Technology Holdings Co., a Delaware corporation 

Adept Technology Canada Holding, Co., a Nova Scotia Canada corporation 

Adept Technology Canada,Co., a Nova Scotia Canada corporation 

Adept MobileRobots LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company 

Adept InMoTx, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Adept Technology Denmark A/S, a Danish corporation
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 1, 2018, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Heterogeneous System Architecture Foundation (“HSA Foundation”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Nanjing Tech University, College of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, has been added as a party to this venture.                

Also, Toshiba Corporation, Kanagawa, JAPAN, has withdrawn as a party to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and HSA Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 31, 2012, HSA Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 11, 2012 (77 FR 61786).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 13, 2018. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 19, 2018 (83 FR 12026).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2018-12206 Filed 6-6-18; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
No. 10599.

#### Harris *v.*The Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Ry. Co. et al.

Decided May 19, 1908.

Error to Superior Court of Cincinnati.

*Messrs. Burch & Johnson*and *Messrs. Strieker & Johnson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoa-dly; Messrs. Probasco & Probasco; Messrs. Maxwell & Ramsey; Messrs. Bromwell & Bruce*and *Messrs. King & Tracy,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauck and Summers, JJ., concur.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA** Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20

- 0373

______________________________ PAUL S. PARISER, ) ) Peti ti oner and Appellee, ) ) and. ) ) JUDITH SHRIAR, ) ) Respondent and Appellant. ) ____________________________________) **ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION**  JUDITH SHRIAR, ) **OF TIME** ) Counter Plaint iff and Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) PAUL S. PARISER, ) ) Counter Defendant and Appellee. ) ) 

### UPON mo ti on of

Appel lee , having no object io n fr om Appellant, and good cause appearing therein; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appell ee’ s moti on f or extensio n of time is granted. Appell ee shall have up to, and including, December 11 , 2020, to prepare and file his response to Appellant’s Opening Brief (and Request for Oral Argument) in regard to this appeal pursuant to Rul e 26(1) of the Rules of Appell ate Procedure. DATED thi s _____ day

of November, 2020.

______________________________

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court November 6 2020

11/06/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0373
No. 10547.

#### The City of Lima *v.*The Ayers Asphalt Paving Co.

Decided April 14, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Allen county.

*Mr. R. C. Eastman,*city solicitor, and *Messrs. Prophet & Eastman,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. D. C. Henderson,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.