alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7186 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Electric Reliability Organization to propose a reliability standard that addresses the resilience of 

the bulk-power system, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Mr. THOMPSON of California (for himself, Mr. BERA, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. 

ESHOO, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. LAMALFA, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. 

MATSUI, Mr. PANETTA, and Mr. SWALWELL of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Power Act to require the Electric 

Reliability Organization to propose a reliability standard 

that addresses the resilience of the bulk-power system, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Utility Resilience and 

5 Reliability Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7186 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROPOSED RELIABILITY STANDARD. 

2 Section 215(d) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

3 824o(d)) is amended by adding at the end the following 

4 new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(7) RESILIENCE OF BULK-POWER SYS6 TEM.— 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 

8 year after the date of enactment of this 

9 paragraph, the Electric Reliability Organi10 zation shall file with the Commission a 

11 proposed reliability standard that address12 es the resilience of the bulk-power system. 

13 ‘‘(B) REGIONAL DIFFERENCES.—The 

14 proposed reliability standard filed under 

15 subsection (A) shall take into account re16 gional differences. 

17 ‘‘(C) RESILIENCE DEFINED.—In this 

18 paragraph, the term ‘resilience’ means the 

19 ability to— 

20 ‘‘(i) prepare for and adapt to 

21 changing conditions; and 

22 ‘‘(ii) withstand and rapidly re23 cover from disruptions, including dis24 ruptions caused by extreme weather 

25 conditions.’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7186 IH

1 SEC. 3. ELECTRIC GRID RESILIENCE EDUCATION PRO2 GRAM. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

4 date of enactment of this section, the Secretary of Energy 

5 shall establish a program to provide information and rec6 ommendations to States and electric utilities on how to 

7 improve the resilience of electric grids. 

8 (b) ELECTRIC UTILITY DEFINED.—The term ‘‘elec9 tric utility’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

10 3 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796). 

11 SEC. 4. REPORT ON PLANNED ELECTRIC POWER OUTAGES 

12 DUE TO EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS. 

13 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

14 of this section, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to 

15 Congress a report, and publish such report on the website 

16 of the Department of Energy, that provides recommenda17 tions on how to minimize the need for, effects of, and du18 ration of planned electric power outages that are due to 

19 extreme weather conditions, including such conditions 

20 under which the National Weather Service issues a red 

21 flag warning. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 02-2090 LOIS R. HALL, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge ] Before Boudin, Chief Judge , Lynch and Howard, Circuit Judges .
Lois R. Hall on brief pro se. Gina Y. Walcott-Torres , Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael J. Sullivan , United States Attorney, on brief for appellees. August 18, 2003-2- Per Curiam . After a thorough review of the record and of the part ies' submissions, we allow the appellees' motion for summarydisposition. We affirm the lower court's dismissal on the groundthat plaintiffs/appellants failed to satisfy the jurisdictional requirement that they f irst submit their claim to the appropriate agency in writing. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); Gonzalez v. United States , 284 F.3d 281, 288 (1st Cir. 2002) ("Pursuant to the FTCA, a tort claim against the United States is 'forever barred' unless it is presented in wr iting to the appropriate federal agency within two years after the claim accrues.") (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b)).

Affirmed . See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27(c).
Exhibit 10.40**Amendment to Stock Option Agreement and Notice**     ThisAmendment to Stock Option Agreement (the “Amendment”) ismade on the27th day ofDecember, 2006 by and between Cyberonics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Shawn P.Lunney, an individual residing in Texas (“Optionee”).     **Whereas**, the Company and Optionee entered into a Stock Option Agreement having a grant date ofNovember 1, 1996, which agreement includes a Notice of Stock Option Grant (the “Agreement”); and     **Whereas**, the Company and Optionee previously agreed to amend the Agreement to extend theperiod for Optionee to exercise the option granted under the Agreement (the “Option”) to December31, 2006;     **Whereas**, the Option is currently unexercisable because an exercise of such right would violateapplicable securities laws; and     **Whereas**, the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the Company to extend the period forOptionee’s exercise of the Option to thirty (30) days after the exercise of such Option would nolonger violate applicable securities laws, all on the conditions set forth in this Agreement;     **Now, Therefore**, for a good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which ishereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:     1. The paragraph entitled, “Termination Period,” under “Notice of Stock Option Grant” isdeleted in its entirety, and the following is substituted therefor:“The Option may be exercised within thirty (30) days after the date on which the exercise ofsuch Option would no longer violate applicable securities laws.”     2. This Amendment supersedes all prior agreements, amendments, understandings, negotiations,and discussion, oral or written, related to such subject matter.     3. Except as expressly amended herein, the terms of the Agreement remain unchanged.       OPTIONEE     CYBERONICS, INC.       /s/Shawn P. Lunney   By: /s/ John A. Riccardi       Shawn P. Lunney     John A. Riccardi      Vice President, Finance
#### In re ESTATE of Samuel T. DAVIS, Deceased.

No. 72-470.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 6, 1973.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 1973.

Fred R. Bland, of Buckley & Bland, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania, F. and A. M.

Shalle Stephen Fine and Arnold Grevior, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees Edgar E. Sims, Sr., as Executor of the Estate of Samuel T. Davis, deceased, and Edgar E. Sims, Sr., individually.

PER CURIAM.

No reversible error has been demonstrated with reference to the appealed order. The decision that the will in question was properly executed free from undue influence is substantially and procedurally correct and adequately supported by the evidence.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
James Adair Above Ground Aero, LLC 120 Teachers Row Richmond Hill, GA 31324 abovegroundaero@gmail.com U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 October 28 , 2015 Please use this letter as a request to amend Above Ground Aero, LLC’s Section 333 request to add 3DR Aero
- M fixed wing UAS for approval. The Aero
- M weighs 6.8 lbs with camera payload and maximum speed is 44 mph. It has some of the same fail safe features that are found on popular quad
- copters. Please see the attached operations manual for more information. Regards,
James Adair Above Ground Aero, LLC
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

DATA DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
(AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                             ----------------------------
                                                                1997              1996
<S>                                                          <C>               <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
        Common stock outstanding                              9,615,668         8,603,409
        Common stock equivalents:
           Common stock warrants, if dilutive                   268,529         1,280,455
           Common stock options -- incremental shares            73,795            20,401
                                                             ----------        ----------
        Weighted average shares outstanding                   9,957,992         9,904,265
                                                             ==========        ==========

        Net income available for common stock                $    2,805        $    2,555
                                                             ==========        ==========

        Primary earnings per share                           $     0.28        $     0.26
                                                             ==========        ==========
</TABLE>






                                       12
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.61
                            ADDENDUM AND AMENDMENT

                        EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS ADDENDUM AND AMENDMENT, made effective this 25th day of January, 2001,
by and among Centura Banks, Inc., a North Carolina corporation having its
principal place of business in Rocky Mount, North Carolina ("Centura"), Centura
Insurance Services, Inc. ("CIS") a subsidiary of Centura, and Thomas A. Betts,
Jr. ("Betts"), an employee of CIS.

     WHEREAS, Centura, CIS and Betts entered into an Executive Employment
Agreement (the "Agreement") as of November 3, 1997, and

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term of
the Agreement;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and the mutual
agreements and understandings hereunder, the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.  Section 2 of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:

         "2.  TERM.

         The initial term of this Agreement commenced on November 3, 1997 and
     shall end on November 3, 2005 (the "Initial Term"). Upon expiration of the
     Initial Term, this Agreement may be renewed for successive periods of one
     (1) year upon the initial agreement of Betts and CIS (the "Renewal
     Terms")."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Addendum and
Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first above written.

                                        CENTURA BANKS, INC.

                                        By: /s/ H. Kel Landis III
                                            -------------------------------
ATTEST:                                                Authorized Officer

/s/ Lynn O. Parrish
-------------------------
          Secretary

(Corporate Seal)

                                        CENTURA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.

                                        By: /s/ James N. Ashby
                                            -------------------------------
ATTEST:                                                Authorized Officer

/s/ Campbell Rodgers, Jr.
--------------------------
          Secretary

(Corporate Seal)



                                        /s/ Thomas A. Betts, Jr.  (SEAL)
                                        --------------------------
                                        Thomas A. Betts, Jr.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G.G.,

A CHILD

 Appellant.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00231-CV

Appeal from the

65

th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2021DCM3172)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s first motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until December 22, 2022. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT. 

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Celia A. Villasenor, the Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 22, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9

th day of December, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-421]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Coast Guard
[CGD 96-070]

National Baseline Requirements Group Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is undertaking an effort to identify the 
minimum capabilities a Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) must have to serve 
its wide range of users. The Coast Guard needs to establish national 
baseline operating requirements that will permit it to take advantage 
of available, off-the-shelf systems that will be less expensive to 
build and operate. In order to have a comprehensive representation of 
all waterway users, the Coast Guard has invited national 
representatives of several maritime organizations to provide input to 
assist in the development of these requirements. This is the first 
meeting of the National Baseline Requirements Group. There will be a 
series of 4-6 meetings which will continue through early 1997.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 15, 1997, from 9 a.m. to 
approximately 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Marine Board Offices, 
National Academy of Science, 2001 Wisconsin Avenue, Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Johnson, Marine Board, National 
Academy of Science, 2001 Wisconsin Avenue, Washington, DC, telephone 
(202) 334-3157, fax (202) 334-3789.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Attendance is open to the public. With 
advance notice, and as time permits, members of the public may make 
oral presentations during the meeting. Persons wishing to make oral 
presentations should notify the person listed above under the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT no later than the day before the meeting. 
Written material may be submitted prior to, during, or after the 
meeting.
    The agenda for the meeting consists of the following items:
    (1) VTS Program Update and VTS Authority.
    (2) Overview of Coast Guard Mission Needs.
    (3) Scope--Critical Areas for VTS.
    (4) Coast Guard Strawman Operational Requirements Menu and Coast 
Guard Expectations and Needs.
    (5) Development of Minimum Safety Baseline VTS.
    (6) Plans for Next Meeting.
    (7) Adjournment.

    Dated: December 31, 1996.
J.C. Card,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Assistant Commandant for Marine Safety 
and Environmental Protection.
[FR Doc. 97-421 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
```
EXHIBIT 99(i)

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2003, hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officers certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or5 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


                              HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                              /s/ RICHARD BANAKUS
                              ------------------------------
                              Richard Banakus
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              May 1, 2003

                                       19
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kilburn Mike BAILEY.

No. 54373.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1974.

In re: Kilburn Mike Bailey applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, and stay order.

Writ denied. Adequate remedy for review if relator is convicted.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-45]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 96-260, RM-8965]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Mankato, Minnesota

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition filed by Mid-
Minnesota Broadcsting Company proposing the allotment of Channel 231A 
to Mankato, Minnesota. The coordinates for Channel 231A at Mankato are 
44-10-12 and 94-00-24.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before February 18, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before March 5, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: 
Abdolmajid Khalizadeh, Philip A. Rubin & Associates, Inc., 1350 
Connecticut Avenue, Suite 610, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Scheuerle, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice 
of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 96-260, adopted December 20, 
1996, and released December 27, 1996. The full text of this Commission 
decision is available for inspection and copying during normal business 
hours in the Commission's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M Street, 
NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may also be 
purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, D.C. 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contact.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-45 Filed 1-2-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
THE BANKER'S STORE, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                             By: /s/  Paul D. Clark
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Paul D. Clark,
                                                 President and CEO
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)


January 21, 2003




<PAGE>


                            THE BANKER'S STORE, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Albert Blankenship, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                             By: /s/ Albert Blankenship
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Albert Blankenship
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 (Principal Accounting Officer)


January 21, 2003
#### Dix *v.*Shoemaker et al., County Commissioners, et al.

*Supreme Court*— Dismissals—No *constitutional question involved.*

(No. 17925

Decided December 18, 1923.)

Error to the Court of Appeals of Delaware county.

*Messrs. Carhart & Warner,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. B. P. Benton,*prosecuting attorney, and *Messrs. Humes & Cupp,*for defendants in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court, that the petition in error filed herein as of right be, and hereby is, dismissed on the ground that no constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Petition in error dismissed.*

Wanamaker, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.