alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4159]



[[Page 7804]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Reporting Statistics--Airlines

AGENCY: National Transportation Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice of statistical reporting changes.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 7, 1997, the NTSB adopted a system for classifying 
airline accidents by their severity. This system is a minor revision of 
a proposal published in the Federal Register on December 5, 1996. An 
improved classification system providing more meaningful measures of 
the level of safety of airline transportation was required by the FAA 
Reauthorization Act of 1996. This notice describes changes in the 
adopted version from the proposed classification system and additional 
accident parameters, many focusing on passenger injuries. The NTSB will 
remain open to suggestions for improving the content and format of its 
statistics.

DATES: The NTSB adopted the new classification system on January 7, 
1997.

ADDRESSES: Comments and suggestions may be submitted to: Analysis and 
Data Division (RE-50), ATTN: Airline Statistics, National 
Transportation Safety Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
20594-2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stan Smith (202) 314-6550.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Safety Board retained its proposed four-
category system but re-designated the second category ``Serious'' 
rather than ``Severe.'' A cautionary note was added to the list of 
accidents in which one or more passengers received fatal injuries. That 
note reads:

    The NTSB wishes to make clear to all users of the following list 
of accidents that the information it contains cannot, by itself, be 
used to compare the safety either of operators or of aircraft types. 
Airlines that have operated the greatest number of flights and 
flight hours could be expected to have suffered the greatest number 
of fatal-to-passenger accidents (assuming that such accidents are 
random events, and not the result of some systematic deficiency). 
Similarly, the most used aircraft types would tend to be involved in 
such accidents more than lesser used types. The NTSB also cautions 
the user to bear in mind when attempting to compare today's airline 
system to prior years that airline activity (and hence exposure to 
risk) has risen by almost 100% from the first year depicted to the 
last.

    Issued in Washington, DC on this 13th day of February, 1997.
Jim Hall,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 97-4159 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1,639,248
<SECURITIES>                                     454,751
<RECEIVABLES>                                    160,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,738,999
<PP&E>                                            21,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (6,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,761,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            922,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         115,450
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,761,779
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  74,111
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    809,075
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (734,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    8,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (727,764)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Howard R.Levine, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Family DollarStores, Inc., (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

·                  theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 3, 2007,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

·                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 12,2007
| /s/ Howard R. Levine                                                                   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|       Howard R. Levine                                   |   |   |
|       Chairman of the  Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|        (Principal  Executive Officer)               |   |   |
|                                                                                        |        |        |  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Family Dollar Stores, Inc., and will be retained by FamilyDollar Stores, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
EXHIBIT 99(iii)


                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                            TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2002, hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officers certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


                                       HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                       /s/ WILLIAM A. FAGOT
                                       -------------------------------
                                       William A. Fagot
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 14, 2002
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7323 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the 190- 

day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the 

Medicare Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2020 

Mr. TONKO (for himself and Mr. HUIZENGA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the 190-day lifetime limit on inpatient psychiatric hospital services under the Medicare Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Mental 

5 Health Inpatient Equity Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF 190-DAY LIFETIME LIMIT ON INPA7 TIENT PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL SERVICES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1812 of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395d) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7323 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by adding ‘‘or’’ at 

3 the end; 

4 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘; or’’ at 

5 the end and inserting a period; and 

6 (C) by striking paragraph (3); and 

7 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘(but shall not 

8 be included’’ and all that follows before the period 

9 at the end. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to items and services furnished 

12 on or after January 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
MDXG- 2013.12.31 10-K Ex 10.5 NQ Agmt




MIMEDX GROUP, INC.
ASSUMED 2006 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
(Non-employee Directors and Independent Contractors)






1.    Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Corporation's Assumed 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), you (the "Participant") have been granted an option (the "Option") to purchase __________ shares (the "Shares") of our Common Stock as outlined below.
        
	
					
	 
	Name of Participant:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Address:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Grant Date:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Number of Shares Subject to Option:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Option Price:
	 
	$
	 

	 
	Type of Option:
	 
	Nonqualified Stock Option
	 

	 
	Expiration Date (Last day of Option Period):
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Vesting Schedule/Conditions:
	 
	33.33% on
	 

	 
	 
	 
	66.66% on
	 

	 
	 
	 
	100% on
	 






2.    By my signature below, the Participant hereby acknowledges receipt of this Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement (the "Agreement") and a copy of the Plan, and furthermore, the Participant agrees to be bound by the terms of the Plan and the Agreement.  The Participant understands that the applicable provisions of the Plan are hereby incorporated by reference into the Agreement and constitute a part of the Agreement.  The Corporation reserves the right to treat the Option and the Agreement as cancelled, void and of no effect if the Participant fails to return a signed copy of this Grant Notice within 30 days of receipt of this Grant Notice.




	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Signature:
	 
	 
	Date:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Agreed to by:

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	MiMedx Group, Inc.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	By:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Name: Parker H. Petit

	 
	 
	 
	Its: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Attest:
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Vice President, Human Resources and Administration
ORlG\NAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

) 

) Docket No. 9327 

Respondent. ) 

) 

ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS 

On May 1, 2009, Respondent, pursuant to Rule 3.34(a)(2) of the Commission's Rules of 

Practice, submitted an application for the issuance of 10 subpoenas commanding persons to 

attend and give testimony at the adjudicative hearing in this matter. Complaint Counsel 

submitted an objection to Respondent's request for a subpoena ad testifcandum to be issued to 

Fran Nasisi, on May 5,2009, but then withdrew its objection on May 6,2009. 

According to Respondent's brief description of 
 the intended testimony of each 

individual, the testimony sought appears to be reasonably relevant. Respondent has represented 

that each of 
 these individuals are located in the United States. 

This Order does not constitute a ruling on admissibility or whether the intended 

testimony from these individuals is cumulative. Pursuant to Rule 3.43 ofthe Commission's 

Rules of Practice, "( e ) 
 vidence, even if relevant, may be excluded. . . by considerations of undue 

delay, waste oftime, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence." 16 C.F.R. § 3.43(b). 

The application is GRANTED. 

ORDERED: -l~~


D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Date: May 6, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7442 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7442

 To extend the authorization for Augusta Canal National Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 1, 2020

  Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authorization for Augusta Canal National Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION EXTENSION FOR AUGUSTA CANAL NATIONAL HERITAGE 
              AREA.

    Section 310 of division II of Public Law 104-333 (16 U.S.C. 461 
note; 110 Stat. 4252) is amended by striking ``2021'' and inserting 
``2036''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REVIEWREPORT

 

Board of Directors andShareholdersCubic Corporation

 

 

We have reviewed theaccompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as ofMarch 31, 2004, and the related consolidated condensed statements of income andcash flows for the three- and six-month period ended March 31, 2004 and2003.  These financial statements arethe responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews inaccordance with standards established by the American Institute of CertifiedPublic Accountants.  A review of interimfinancial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures tofinancial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial andaccounting matters.  It is substantiallyless in scope than an audit in accordance with auditing standards generallyaccepted in the United States, which will be performed for the full year withthe objective of expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements takenas a whole.  Accordingly, we do notexpress such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we arenot aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanyingconsolidated condensed financial statements referred to above for them to be inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

We have previously audited, inaccordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, theconsolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2003 andthe related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equityand cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our reportdated November 19, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on thoseconsolidated financial statements.  Inour opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidatedcondensed balance sheet at September 30, 2003, is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which ithas been derived.

 

 
|   |   |   | /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|

 

San Diego, CaliforniaApril 23, 2004

 

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Office of the Secretary 

July 18, 2013 

Karen Rome 

State of South Carolina 

Re: In the Matter of The Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., File No. 082 3199, Docket No. C-4407 

 In the Matter of DrJays.com, Inc., File No. 122 3063, Docket No. C-4408 

 In the Matter of Eminent, d/b/a Revolve Clothing, File No. 122 3065, Docket No. C-4409 

Dear Ms. Rome: 

 Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent agreements 

in the above-referenced proceedings. The Commission has placed your comment on the public 

record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii), 

and has given it serious consideration. 

Your comment raised concern that the agreements may not impose “meaningful 

consequences” on the respondents. After consideration of your comment, the Commission has 

determined that the relief set forth in the consent agreements is appropriate and sufficient to remedy 

the violations alleged in the complaints. The orders prohibit the respondents from web, mail, and 

catalog advertisements that violate the Fur Act and Rules. Under federal law, a violation of an FTC 

order is punishable by a civil penalty of up to $16,000 per violation. Therefore, if the respondents’ 

websites falsely advertise fur products as “faux” in the future, the respondents may be liable for 

significant civil penalties. Moreover, respondents have offered refunds to all consumers who 

purchased the falsely advertised products. 

Accordingly, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served by 

issuing the Decision and Order in each of these matters in final form without modification. The final 

Decisions and Orders and other relevant materials are available from the Commission’s website at 

http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, 

and we thank you again for your comment. 

By direction of the Commission. 

 Donald S. Clark 

 Secretary
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11341-11342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Parts 204, 225, and 252

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to provide needed editorial 
changes.

DATES: Effective February 28, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Manuel Quinones, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 571-372-6088; 
facsimile 571-372-6094.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends the DFARS as follows:
    1. Correct 204.1105 and 252.204-7004 to conform to the FAR by 
changing ``clause'' to ``provision''.
    2. Correct a cross reference at 204.7103-1(d).
    3. Redesignate 225.004 as 225.070 and revise the text.

[[Page 11342]]

    4. Correct 252.225-7029 clause title in the eCFR.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 204, 225, and 252

    Government procurement.

Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR parts 204, 225, and 252 is amended as follows:

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 204, 225, and 252 continues 
to read as follows:

    Authority:  41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 204--ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

204.1105  [Amended]

0
2. Section 204.1105 is amended by removing the word ``clause'' and 
adding the word ``provision'' in its place.

204.7103-1  [Amended]

0
3. Section 204.7103-1 is amended, in paragraph (d), by removing ``See 
204.7105(a).'' and adding ``See 204.7105.'' in its place.

PART 225--AMENDED

225.004  [Redesignated as 225.070]

0
4. Section 225.004 is redesignated as 225.070 and revised to read as 
follows:

225.070  Reporting of acquisition of end products manufactured outside 
the United States.

    Follow the procedures at PGI 225.070 for entering the data on the 
acquisition of end products manufactured outside the United States.

PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

252.204-7004  [Amended]

0
5. Section 252.225-7004 is amended by--
0
a. Removing the clause date ``(MAY 2013)'' and adding ``(FEB 2014)'' in 
its place.
0
b. Removing, in paragraph (a), the word ``clause'' and adding the word 
``provision'' in its place.

252.225-7029  [Amended]

0
6. Section 252.225-7029 clause title is amended by removing the word 
``the'' in two places.

[FR Doc. 2014-04160 Filed 2-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

t1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

147708

ABUNDANT LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER , a/k/a

ABUNDANT LIFE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 147708

COA: 310713

MTT: 00

- 382316

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD,

Respondent

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# f

AA - Z () 10 - 

# I 

# '30 

# '-I Contacts .••.·Jim .•.•

~ O<J!S~ me f:>);.I-,a this prC9OS<l! ~ lf~



# ~ I Pe~ Ccruadcd! Date 

## I Response I ".,t;"., .•

ll!u~inM' .lo.' •.•. r-l{l .\,~ ••. tiun Oi ("(lll' 

# '4,J2.~IiO 

# I 

# - I 

# I.'~"'"" ,',,;"" A""';"~" lb. t· L"Il"r"r Cl>llllir 

# - ,l.flliJhl 

# "/2.«/10 

# , '",' •.,f: D"'Wl".'" J'il.d~ ,\.)"..Ki~lh,\l] I~t,l"'!'tII:1CI.,Il\"~

# 4)';'#J , 

# - , 

## .. 

# i 'l' ~ .{" •..• "1'!lilt' 

# "'/l.'I!I! 

# -
259 La. 797

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Milton LAWRENCE v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 51797.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 13, 1971.

In re: Milton Lawrence, applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied; there is no error in the ruling of the trial court on the evi-dentiary hearing.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00412

- CV

TANYA MARIE COX

, Appellant

v.

ARNOLD GERIK

, Appellee

From the 170th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- 3969

- 4

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Tanya Cox, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of

appellee, Arnold Gerik, on October 27, 2017. By letter dated February 6, 2018, the Clerk

of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal because the

origin al filing fee had not been paid and warned appellant that the Court would dismiss

the appeal unless, within ten days from the date of the letter, appellant paid the filing fee

or obtained indigent status for the purposes of appeal. Ten days have passed, a ndC ox v. Gerik Page 2

appellant has not paid the filing fee for this appeal. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this

appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P . 42.3 (c).

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinio n de livered and filed February 28, 2018

[CV06]