alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7224-7225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3854]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-226-000]


Sabine Pipe Line Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 4, 1997, Sabine Pipe Line Company 
(Sabine) P.O. Box 4781, Houston, Texas 77210-4781, filed in the above 
docket, a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations for authorization to use an existing receipt 
tap to deliver gas through displacement to MidCon Gas Pipeline Corp. 
(MidCon). The receipt

[[Page 7225]]

tap, constructed under Sabine's blanket certificate issued on March 31, 
1983, in Docket No. CP83-199-000, interconnects Sabine's 16-inch low-
pressure mainline with MidCon's pipeline in Jefferson County, Texas, 
all as more fully set forth in the request which is file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    Sabine states that the maximum quantity of gas that will be 
delivered through the interconnect is 100,000 MMcf per day. Sabine also 
states that the delivery through displacement to the MidCon point will 
be available to all existing and potential shippers receiving service 
under Sabine's IT-1 Rate Schedule set forth in Sabine's FERC Gas 
Tariff, subject to prevailing operating conditions. Sabine states that 
no construction is required to operate the point as proposed, and 
therefore, no costs will be incurred.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.215) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Sec. 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity is deemed to be authorized 
effective on the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3854 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF FGI                        


FARMERS GROUP, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS AS FARMERS 
UNDERWRITERS ASSOCIATION 


         Truck Underwriters Association, a California corporation

         Fire Underwriters Association, a California corporation

         F.I.G. Holding Company, a California corporation  (1)

         Farmers New World Life Insurance Company, a Washington corporation
 
         FIG Leasing Co., Inc., a California corporation  (2)

         Prematic Service Corporation, a California corporation  (3)

         Prematic Service Corporation, a Nevada corporation  (4)

         Farmers Group Capital, a Delaware statutory business trust

         Farmers Group Capital II, a Delaware statutory business trust

         Farmers Investment Research & Management, a Nevada corporation

         Farmers Underwriters Association, a California corporation (inactive)

         F.I.G. Travel, a California corporation (inactive)

	Farmers Services Corporation, a Nevada corporation

	Farmers Financial Services Corporation, a Nevada corporation

-----------------------------------------

(1)            Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters Association
               own 30% and 70%, respectively, of the equity of F.I.G. 
               Holding Company.

(2)            FGI, Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters 
               Association own 95.2%, 3.1% and 1.7%, respectively, of the 
               equity of FIG Leasing Co., Inc..

(3)            FGI, Truck Underwriters Association and Fire Underwriters 
               Association own 38%, 53% and 9%, respectively, of the 
               equity of Prematic Service Corporation, a California 
               corporation.

(4)            Prematic Service Corporation, a California corporation, owns 
               100% of the equity of Prematic Service Corporation, a Nevada 
               corporation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
ACCOMPANYING  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATAMETRICS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE SIX MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED  APRIL  30,  2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    OCT-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                       332
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              1,228
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                2,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           5,332
<PP&E>                                                     7,828
<DEPRECIATION>                                             5,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            11,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      8,850
<BONDS>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                     190
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                43,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              11,219
<SALES>                                                    2,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           2,319
<CGS>                                                      2,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              2,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           1,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (2,640)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (2,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (2,640)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (.14)




</TABLE>
#### Hannelore S. BRUSS, Lore J. Bruss, a minor, by and through her father and next of friend, Wilhelm Bruss, Heide Bruss, a minor, by and through her father and next of friend, Wilhelm Bruss, and Wilhelm Bruss, individually, Appellants, v. Beatrice Foley CANIN and John Canin, Appellees.

No. 70-600.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 11, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Hugh MacMillan, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4432]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Declaration of Economic Injury Disaster Loan Area # 9383]

South Dakota (And Contiguous Counties in Minnesota, Iowa, 
Nebraska & Wyoming)

    Declaration of Disaster Loan Area Aurora, Dewey, Hamlin, 
Hutchinson, Lake, Lincoln, Lyman, McPherson, Pennington, Perkins, 
Roberts, Shannon, Spink, and Todd Counties, which together with their 
contiguous counties comprise the entire State of South Dakota; as well 
as Big Stone County, Minnesota; Lyon and Sioux Counties in Iowa; 
Cherry, Dawes, Keya Paha, and Sheridan Counties in Nebraska; and Weston 
County, Wyoming constitute an economic injury disaster loan area as a 
result of severe winter storms and blizzard conditions during the 
period of January 3 through January 31, 1997. Eligible small businesses 
without credit available elsewhere and small agricultural cooperatives 
without credit available elsewhere may file applications for economic 
injury assistance until the close of business on November 14, 1997 at 
the address listed below: U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster 
Area 3 Office, 4400 Amon Carter Blvd., Suite 102, Fort Worth, TX 76155, 
or other locally announced locations. The interest rate for eligible 
small businesses and small agricultural cooperatives is 4 percent. Any 
contiguous counties not listed herein have been covered under a 
separate declaration for the same occurrence.
    The economic injury numbers assigned to this disaster are 938300 
for South Dakota; 938400 for Minnesota; 938500 for Iowa; 938600 for 
Nebraska; and 938700 for Wyoming.

    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 59002)

    Dated: February 14, 1997.
Ginger Lew,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-4432 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3832]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[ES-960-1420-00] ES-48578, Group 27, Illinois


Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Illinois

    The plat, in five sheets, of the dependent resurvey of portions of 
the north and west boundaries, portions of the subdivisional lines, and 
the survey of the subdivision of section 8 and the Lock and Dam No. 26 
acquisition boundary, Township 13 South, Range 1 West, Fourth Principal 
Meridian, Illinois, will be officially filed in Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia at 7:30 a.m., on March 24, 1997.
    The survey was requested by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
    All inquiries or protests concerning the technical aspects of the 
survey must be sent to the Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Eastern States, 
Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 
22153, prior to 7:30 a.m., March 24, 1997.
    Copies of the plat will be made available upon request and 
prepayment of the reproduction fee of $2.75 per copy.

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
Stephen G. Kopach,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 97-3832 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The
Banker's Store, Inc., a New York corporation (the "Company").  I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB/A of the
Company for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2008 and filed with the
U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB/A").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 23, 2009
        --------------
                                           /s/ Thomas C. Cook
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Thomas C. Cook
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Principal Financial Officer

<PAGE>
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

 

)

In the Matter of )

) 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, N.V., )

a foreign corporation, )

)

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, ) Docket No. 9300

a corporation, and )

)

PITT-DES MOINES, INC., )

a corporation. )

 )

To: Commission

COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S RESPONSE TO 

RESPONDENTS’ MOTION FOR IN CAMERA TREATMENT

On February 11, 2005, Complaint counsel filed temporarily under seal its Opposition to

Respondents’ Petition to Reconsider together with a redacted, public record copy thereof in order

to afford the submitter an opportunity to seek in camera treatment of material previously

designated as confidential. On February 22, 2005, respondents filed a motion requesting in

camera treatment of Attachment A to, and corresponding test in, Complaint counsel’s

opposition. Without taking a position on the merits of respondents’ arguments, Complaint

counsel hereby notifies the Commission that it does not oppose the relief requested by

respondents. 

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________

Rhett R. Krulla

Steven Wilensky

Counsel Supporting the Complaint
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 24, 2005, I caused:

One original and twelve copies of Complaint Counsel’s Response to

Respondents’ Motion for In Camera Treatment to be served by hand delivery and

one copy to be served by electronic mail upon:

Office of the Secretary

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

One copy to be served by first class mail upon:

Nada Sulaiman

Winston & Strawn

1400 L Street, NW

Washington, DC 20005

Jeffrey A. Leon

Duane M. Kelley

Winston & Strawn

315 W. Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60601-9703

(312) 558-5600

Clifford H. Aronson 

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Four Times Square

New York, NY 10036

(212) 735-2644

Counsel for Respondents

 

Rhett Krulla

Commission Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4732]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 701-TA-367 (Final)]


Certain Laminated Hardwood Flooring From Canada

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Termination of investigation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 4, 1997, the Department of Commerce published 
notice in the Federal Register of a negative final determination of 
subsidies in connection with the subject investigation (62 F.R. 5201). 
Accordingly, pursuant to section 207.40(a) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Sec. 207.40(a)), the countervailing duty 
investigation concerning certain laminated hardwood from Canada 
(investigation No. 701-TA-367 (Final)) is terminated.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 4, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olympia Hand (202-205-3182), Office of 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by 
accessing its internet server (http://www.usitc.gov or <a href="ftp://
ftp.usitc.gov">ftp://
ftp.usitc.gov</a>).

    Authority: This investigation is being terminated under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published pursuant to section 201.10 of the Commission's rules (19 
CFR Sec. 201.10).

    Issued: February 21, 1997.

    By order of the Commission.
Donna R. Koehnke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4732 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
OR\G'NAL 


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 


FEDERAL TRADE..GOMMI$SION 


OFFICE OF ADMINISTRA'tIVE LAW JUDGES 


.. ' 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

McWANE, INC., ) 

a corporation, and ) DOCKET NO. 9351 

) 

STAR PIPE PRODUCTS, LTD., ) 

a limited partnership, ) 

Respondents. ) 

) 

ORDER GRANTING SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION OF 

MCWANE, INC. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

On March 30, 2012, Respondent McWane, Inc. ("McWane") filed its second unopposed 

motion to extend the time for McWane to file a response to SIP Industries' ("SIP") Motion to 

Quash McWane's Subpoena Duces Tecum ("Motion to Quash") served on it by SIP on or about 

March 9,2012 ("Second Unopposed Motion"). 

By Order dated March 20,2012, McWane was previously granted an extension oftime to 

file its response to SIP's Motion to Quash through March 30, 2012. 

In support ofits motion, McWane states that the parties continue to be engaged in 

negotiations regarding the scope ofMcWane's specifications and SIP's objections. McWane 

further states that SIP does not oppose an additional seven (7) day extension through April 6, 

2012, to facilitate those negotiations and to file a response to SIP's Motion to Quash, should 

there remain any unresolved issues. 

Accordingly, based on the foregoing, the Second Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. It is 

hereby ORDERED that the deadline for McWane to file any response to SIP's Motion to Quash 

shall be April 6, 2012. 

ORDERED: 

D. Michael Chappell 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: April 2, 2012
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7475 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the period of a 

nationwide pandemic is a special enrollment period under the Federal 

Employees Health Benefits Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 1, 2020 

Mr. VELA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the 

period of a nationwide pandemic is a special enrollment 

period under the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring FEHBP 

5 Coverage During Pandemic Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7475 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEHBP SPECIAL ENROLLMENT PERIOD DURING 

2 PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8905 of title 5, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(j)(1) An unenrolled employee may, during the pe7 riod that a nationwide pandemic is in effect (as deter8 mined by the Office of Personnel Management), enroll in 

9 a health benefits plan under this chapter. 

10 ‘‘(2) An employee who is enrolled in such a plan may, 

11 during any period described in paragraph (1), change such 

12 enrollment.’’. 

13 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub14 section (a) shall apply to any contract entered into under 

15 section 8902 of title 5, United States Code, before, on, 

16 or after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7142

STEVEN J. REED,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANK DREW, Sheriff; CAPTAIN WILKIE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-4-3)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven J. Reed, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven J. Reed appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Reed v. Drew, No. CA-98-

4-3 (E.D. Va. July 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David Lee HENRY, Appellee.

No. 73-1533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 99.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I Enzo J. Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.












      /S/ ENZO J. VIALARDI
      --------------------
      Enzo J. Vialardi
      Chief Financial Officer
      May 12, 2003



<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,300
<INVENTORY>                                     62,990
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,444
<PP&E>                                          39,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 196,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,626
<BONDS>                                         89,486
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   196,673
<SALES>                                         67,382
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,382
<CGS>                                           28,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    863
<INCOME-TAX>                                       362
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       501
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>