alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

 CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM PRESIDENT, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         AND ITEM 307 OF REGULATION S-K

I, David Pollock, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the period
ended December 31, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

/s/ David Pollock
-----------------
David Pollock
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

February 14, 2008
#### LAKE KILLARNEY APARTMENTS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE of John M. THOMPSON, Jr., and Lucille Frostman et al., Appellees. LAKE KILLARNEY APARTMENTS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. ESTATE of John M. THOMPSON, Jr., and Thomas S. Mederos, Jr., as Executor of the Estate of John M. Thompson, Jr., Deceased, et al., Appellees. Richard B. MULDREW et al., Appellants, v. Doris W. FOLEY, as Ancillary Administratrix of the Estate of James S. Foley, Deceased, and Thomas J. Doherty, Appellees.

Nos. 71-1093 to 71-1095.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 15, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 99(a)

                      INSILCO CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



                SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                 (In thousands)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Additions
                                                                      ---------------------
                                                                         (1)        (2)
                                                                       Charged    Charged
                                                          Balance at  to costs    to other                       Balance
                                                           beginning     and      accounts     Deductions       at end of
                      Description                          of period  expenses   (describe)    (describe)        period
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 <S>                                                       <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>              <C>
 For the year ended December 31, 1995:

    Allowances deducted from assets:

       Accounts receivable (for doubtful
         receivables)                                         $2,247     9,775          -         (719)(a)        11,303

       Inventory (primarily for obsolescence)                  4,094     9,031          -       (6,971)(b)         6,154



 For the year ended December 31, 1996:

    Allowances deducted from assets:

       Accounts receivable (for doubtful
         receivables)                                         11,303     2,298         -        (8,623)(a)         4,978

       Inventory (primarily for obsolescence)
                                                               6,154     2,606         -        (2,644)(b)         6,116


</TABLE>
Notes:   (a)  Primarily accounts written-off, net of recoveries.
         (b)  Primarily obsolete parts written-off.
Exhibit 10.4


 


SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA, LTD.


 


November 1, 2021


 


Via Email


 


Dear Mr. Heng Wang:


 


This letter shall confirm
our discussions pursuant to which you have indicated your willingness to serve as a Class I director on the Board of Directors of Sino-Global
Shipping America, Ltd. (the “Company”), Chairperson of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, a member of the Audit
Committee and a member of the Compensation Committee, effective the date herein, until the next annual shareholders meeting or your earlier
resignation or the removal pursuant to the Company’s by-laws.


 


Our company compensates our
non-employee directors for all services they perform as a director of our company, including attendance at Board of Directors meetings
and service as members of committees of the Board of Directors to which they are appointed. The details of such compensation are:


 


		1.	an annual compensation of $20,000;


 


		2.	eligible to participate in the Company’s
Stock Incentive Plan, and to be compensated at the same level of other independent directors’ of the Company.


 


You would also be reimbursed
for all of your out-of-pocket expenses in traveling to and attending meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which you would
serve.


 


You may indicate your agreement
with these terms by signing and dating this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned. By signing this letter agreement, you
reconfirm to the Company that you have no contractual commitments or other legal obligations that would prohibit you from performing your
duties for the Company.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	SINO-GLOBAL SHIPPING AMERICA, LTD.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Jing Wang
	 	 	Jing Wang



 


I have read and accept and agree to the above terms of employment:


 


	By:	/s/ Heng Wang	 
	 	Heng Wang
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1252 Prepped byCandice Davis



# Document

Number: 

# 43 ) ll-B- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-90-2 2

Printed 5/21/2008 11:46:01 AM Sheet 43 of 184

## P. 2 FE B 0 1 '9 : 07=50Ar 1 MIDWES ' RESO*C H N C 

# S MXDHIT BOTU mXBSTIT0T 1 Suit * 35 0 40 1 Harriso noafc s Boulevar d cary , Nort hCarolin a2751 3 Telaphon a(919 ) 077-024 9 Fa x(919 ) 677-00C 5 

# EP AAI R FACSIMIL ETUUWMXMZO VtBftUlS V 

# TO : fl ftltf

# J Q

frft^ QctWa l Xcto^l U

CHARG ENO : ^U^.^.l f ^ (Giv e Tas k

AN D Subtas k

NosT ) 

## PROM : TIM El DATE : 

# A-90-2 2 ll-B- 3 

# MRI $

THI S TRANSMISSIO

N CONSIST S O F .

S PAOB S (INCLODIK C THI S PAGE ) RECEIVIN

GFACSIMIL E TELEPHONE NUMBER : ^^1'^L J VERIFICATIO

N TELEPHONE NUMBER : COMMENTS :

# CURREN TO R PROPOSE D REGULATION S
STATE/LOCALIT Y ALASK A CAUFORNIA/BAAQM D

CALIFORNIA/SCA B LOtBaAN A

ME WJERSE Y PENNSYLVANI A REGULATE D COMMODITIE S AI L VOC S ALLVOCS *

ALLVOCS 1 ALLVOCS *

GASOLIN E AL L VO C « * REGULATE D TERMINAL S

THROUGHPU T> &M M BSL/Y R O R EMISSION S J

> 2S O TONS/Y R AL L

THROUGHPU T> 1,03 0 BBULOAOIN G UNCONTROLLE D EMISSION S > 1O 0 TONS/Y R
THROUGHPU T> 6 M M GAL/Y R AL L DAT E O F COMPLIANC E JUN E 199 2 JUL Y1 . 1991 . FO R TERMINAL S WIT H THROUGHPU T> 1 M M BBL/Y R JULY1 . 1992 . FO R AL L OTHER S NO TYE TDETERMINE D MA Y1 , 1991 . FO R GASOUN E AN D OTHB R VOC S MA Y1 . 1992 . FO R CRUD E OS . FEBRUAR Y28 . 1981 ° 199 2 ? EMISSIO N REDUCTIONAJMI T 9 6 % REDUCTIO N O R 2 LB/1.00 0 BS L 9 5 % REDUCTIO N ORS-7mg A

9 6 % REDUCTIO N VARIABL E DEPENDIN G UPO N COMMODIT YAM D VESSE L TYP E 9 § % REDUCTIO N 9 0 % REDUCTIO N *VOC S MCUJD E AI L HYDROCARBON S WIT H ATRU E VAPO R PRESSUR E O F 1. 6 PSI AO R ABOV E IE.G. . GASOUNE , JE TFUEL . CRUD E OS ^ ETC) . •VOC S MCUID E GASOUNE , CRUD E CH U GASOUN E BLENDIN G STOCK S AN D AVIATIO N FUEL . CONCLUDE

S AN YVO C WHIC H BOOST S ATERMBIAL' S EMISSION S T O 10 0 TONS/YR . TENTATIV E DEADLINE . •A S DEFINE D B

YU . S , EP A t o C J

I •
e n 

# 5 

# s en



## y

v*nta 2 6 IW1W HP. 4 

### '9 1 0?:51fiJ 1 MIDWES TRESEARCH N

C P. 3



## aeunt £ez(SSATB-'CA'.gWD . coun t fe s (S^^'C&'.MB . 4 0 ?Qcer^ D QMVa0 

## . STHRU3>0 ) .AND . STHRUSTOPO )



## . eeun t 4 0

. coun t 11 0

. coun t 10 2

. coun t $ 8 f o rETA!»-'Ca ' \ Aum 

### ^

^ *«rwnqi s \n«+* « SW * +h«u^f*«" S raCOrd S — " •— m -j> erairoTranT^f ltt. .« . . ^ r


## Cosaan dBDi\mar?\FROF2L E BSQ C 

## EOF/180 0

4T


# O^VK* ^ CC^V^OUA^S 

# ^""V—r^^^auaiz "

1 M B u £ I
255 La. 163

#### MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Honorable Jim GARRISON, District Attorney in and for the Parish of Orleans.

No. 50281.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 16, 1970.

In re: Maryland National Insurance Company applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. While these proceedings are recognized as civil in nature, under the return of the trial court the oral representations made for the deposition, the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction is not warranted.

HAMITER, J., concurs in the result.
#### Harlon JENKINS, as father of Loreen Audrey Jenkins, deceased minor, and Harlon E. Jenkins, Individually, Petitioners, v. Ernest JACOBSEN and M. E. Jacobsen, a/k/a Margaret E. Jacobsen, Respondents.

No. 70-286.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 19, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 7, 1970.

*281Stephen P. Kanar of Fishback, Davis Dominick & Salfi, Orlando, for petitioners.

Monroe E. McDonald of Sanders, Mc-Ewan, Mims & McDonald, Orlando, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we are asked to review an interlocutory order denying the plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint by adding as a party defendant the liability insurance carrier of the present defendant. On the authority of Ross v. Bowling, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 415 we grant the petition for certiorari and quash the order under review, remanding with directions to allow the amendment.

WALDEN, McCAIN and OWEN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                         ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION

            FORM OF OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF
                             THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

    Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
          Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements

I, Dian C. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, and David B. Spacht, Chief Financial
Officer, of Artesian Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on our knowledge:

        (1)     The Company's periodic report containing financial statements on
                Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
                2004 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements of
                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                (15 USC Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)), as amended; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2005


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER:                       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER:


/s/ DIAN C. TAYLOR                             /s/ DAVID B. SPACHT
------------------------                       ------------------------
Dian C. Taylor                                 David B. Spacht
Exhibit 32.1
  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION*
 (Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of QSGI INC., hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge, that:
  (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QSGI INC. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: December 1, 2011

/s/ Marc ShermanMarc Sherman

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 
 __________________
 * The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

November 10, 2014

Duane Ambrose

State of Michigan

Re: In the Matter of Made in the USA Brand, LLC

File No. 142 3121, Docket No. C-4497

Thank you for commenting on the Federal Trade Commission’s proposed consent agreement in 

the above-referenced proceeding. The Commission has considered your comment and placed it on the 

public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. §

4.9(b)(6)(ii).

In your comment, you state that a company’s word alone is not trustworthy, and request that the 

Commission require marketers to substantiate their U.S.-origin and other claims. You do not propose 

any revisions to the draft complaint or the consent agreement.

Section 5 of the FTC Act requires companies to possess substantiation for their marketing 

claims, and the Commission’s Enforcement Policy Statement on U.S.-Origin Claims provides specific 

guidance to marketers on how to substantiate those claims.1

 In particular, the Policy Statement provides 

that when a marketer makes an unqualified “Made in USA” claim, the marketer should – at the time the 

representation is made – possess and rely upon a reasonable basis establishing that the product is “all or 

virtually all” made in the United States. In this case, Section II of the consent agreement specifically 

requires Made in the USA Brand, LLC either to possess competent and reliable evidence substantiating 

its representations that products are made in the USA, or to disclose that it relies on self-certification to 

substantiate its clients’ claims.

Therefore, after considering your comment, the Commission has determined that the relief set 

forth in the consent agreement is appropriate and sufficient to remedy the violations alleged in the 

complaint. At this time, the Commission has determined that the public interest would best be served by 

issuing the Decision and Order in final form without modification. The final Decision and Order and 

other relevant materials are available on the Commission’s website at http://www.ftc.gov. It helps the 

Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work, and we thank you again for your 

comment.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

 

1 See 15 U.S.C. § 45(a) and Federal Trade Commission, Issuance of Enforcement Policy Statement on 

“Made in USA” and Other U.S. Origin Claims, 62 Fed. Reg. 63756, 63766 (December 2, 1997), 

available at http://www.ftc.gov/os/fedreg/1997/december/ 971202madeinusa.pdf.
Exhibit 32.1


                           Certification of CEO Pursuant to
                               18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                As Adopted Pursuant to
                       Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Farmers Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martin D.
Feinstein, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/  Martin D. Feinstein
------------------------
Martin D. Feinstein
Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2003


This certification is being furnished to accompany this Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.
# OAR Box 1781 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 122 ) IV-C-3 6 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:23 AM Sheet 122 of 142 P. 1P. 2

*<*° Sr <V . UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y [ JSgrnsj

°* Offic e o fAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s I ^V|/^ Z /

Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 277 1 

## ^ ^ SE P 

## 2 8 199 2

Mr . Davi d G . Hawkin s Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l 135 0 Ne wYor k Avenue , N W Washington , D.C . 2000 5 Dea r Mr . Hawkins : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Freedomo f Informatio n Ac t (FOIA ) Reques t o f Septembe r 11 , 1992 , regarding certai n Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) document s receive d froman y perso n o r entit youtsid e th e Federa l governmen t relatin g t o material s prepare d b yth e EPAi n connectio n wit hth e Agency' s announce d intentio n t o "clarify " th e curren t regulatory definitio n o f bes t availabl e contro l technolog yunde r th e Clea n Ai r Act , including comment s o n an ydraf t propose d rules . You r reques t i s being processe d pursuan t t o ou r FOI Aprocedure s an d i s identifie d b

yth e numbe r HQ-RIN-06397-92 . I a menclosing a copyo f a Jul y14 , 199 2 lette r from Margare t A . Welsh , Actin g Executiv e Director , Electri c Generatio n Association , t o WilliamG . Rosenberg , Assistan t Administrato r fo r Ai r an d Radiation , wit hcomment s o n th e draf t propose d rul e whic h i s responsiv e t o you r request . Ther e ar e n o researc ho r copyin g charge s fo r thi s document . Sincerely , 1/ John Calcagn i jf tf~^Directo r /Qu < Air/Qualit yManagemen t Divisio n Enclosur eP. 3 lJ/f IS t 4

^ t 0 sr<r*- 

# USE / \r of UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e o fAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 ( 

## SE P 

## 2 8 199

2

Mr . Davi d G . Hawkin s Natura l Resource s Defens e Counci l 135 0 Ne wYor k Avenue , N W Washington , D.C . 2000 5 Dea r Mr . Hawkins : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r Freedomo f Informatio n Ac t (FOIA ) Reques t o f Septembe r 11 , 1992 , regarding certai n Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA ) document s receive d froman y perso n o r entit youtsid e th e Federa l governmen t relatin g t o material s prepare d b yth e EPAi n connectio n wit hth e Agency' s announce d intentio n t o "clarify " th e curren t regulator y definitio n o f bes t availabl e contro l technolog yunde r th e Clea n Ai r Act , including comment s o n an ydraf t propose d rules . You r reques t i s bein g processe d pursuan t t o ou r FOI Aprocedure s an d i s identifie d b

yth e numbe r HQ-RIN-06397-92 . I a menclosing a copyo f a Jul y14 , 199 2 lette r fro m Margare t A . Welsh , Actin g Executiv e Director , Electri c Generatio n Association , t o WilliamG . Rosenberg , Assistan t Administrato r fo r Ai r an d Radiation , wit hcomment s o n th e draf t propose d rul e whic h i s responsiv e t o you r request . Ther e ar e n o researc ho r copyin g charge s fo r thi s document . Sincerely ,



# , I) / s tjJt^-J 1/ John Calcagn i jr \h*\ Directo r Air(Qualit yManagemen t Divisio n Enclosur e
TIMELINE FOR 2010 PRIMARY SO2 NAAQS DESIGNATION PROCESS

MILESTONE DATE**

ROUND 1 – Areas Associated with 2009-2011 Monitored Violations

EPA signs notice promulgating final SO2 area 

designations for 29 nonattainment areas

July 25, 2013

FR Publication (78 FR 47191) August 5, 2013

Effective Date October 4, 2013

ROUND 2 – Areas Associated with 68 Power Plants & New Monitored Violations

Court Order March 2, 2015

States may submit updated recommendations and 

supporting information for area designations to 

EPA

No later than September 18, 2015

EPA notifies states concerning any intended 

modifications to their recommendations (120-day 

letters)

January 22, 2016

(no later than 120 days prior to final designations)

EPA publishes public notice of state 

recommendations and EPA’s intended 

modifications and initiates 30-day public 

comment period

o/a February 3, 2016

End of 30-day public comment period o/a March 4, 2016

States and tribes submit additional information, if 

desired, to demonstrate why an EPA modification 

is inappropriate

o/a April 8, 2016

EPA signs notice promulgating final SO2 area 

designations (no later than 16 months from Court 

Order)

No later than July 2, 2016

ROUND 3 – Modeled Areas and Areas w/o Monitors

States submit air quality modeling results for 

selected areas (per proposed SO2 DRR*)

January 13, 2017

EPA notifies states concerning any intended 

modifications to their recommendations (120-day 

letters)

No later than September 1, 2017

EPA signs notice promulgating final SO2 area 

designations (per Court Order)

No later than December 31, 2017

ROUND 4 – New Monitored Areas/All Remaining Areas

States begin operating new monitoring network

(per proposed SO2 DRR*)

January 1, 2017

States certify 2019 monitoring data (to calculate 

2017-2019 design value)

May 1, 2020

EPA notifies states concerning any intended 

modifications to their recommendations (120-day 

letters)

No later than September 2, 2020

EPA signs notice promulgating final SO2 area 

designations (per Court Order)

No Later than December 31, 2020

* Proposed SO2 DRR = Data Requirements Rule for the 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Primary National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS); Proposed Rule (79 FR 27446, May 13, 2014)

** o/a = on or about