alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gregory L. Burns, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of O'Charley's Inc;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 11, 2004

                                           /s/ Gregory L. Burns
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION*
 (Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of QSGI INC., hereby certify, to such officers’ knowledge, that:
  (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QSGI INC. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: December 1, 2011

/s/ Marc ShermanMarc Sherman

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
 
 __________________
 * The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 10649.

#### The Hollenden Hotel Co. *v.*Jackson, Admx.

Decided June 2, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Messrs. Kline, Tolies & Goff*and *Messrs. Ford, Snyder & Tilden,*for plaintiff in error.

*Messrs. McGrath & Stern,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Si-iauck, Crew, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
OR\Gi~iAlr~-:.,J;O....._--

f"~~~~~;~"?~'", r \f;.~iì i~ ;~, ;.') , r., t.':: ',; ;: .,~t~)~,~.'~,~

(c.S'" i'lt~¡¡1/";-';'d.'r."'." ,.:;t-\ ,l (¡.."~ c;'l, ~~ _ _ ~ ',~

\ jM~ 2 ,j £ue~ .' ) ", 5'¥b i 11 ell -~~/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERA TRAE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

Polypore International, Inc.

a corporation. PUBLIC

RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF

Complaint Counsel respectfully opposes Respondent's motion for leave to file a reply

brief. Respondent's efforts would add nothing and would delay the cour's ruling until next

week, complicating planing and encouragig the cour to set a later tral date. Whether or not

Respondent agrees with Complaint Counsel about the characterizations ofthe facts in Complaint

Counsel's opposition to Respondent's motion for leave to amend the scheduling order, the fact

remains that the Cour already ruled on this same issue last year when Respondent sought to

move the tral date to May 18, 2009. Because of the requirement under Rule 3.51 that an initial

decision be filed within one year ofthe issuance ofthe complaint, moving the tral date would

put undue pressure on the Cour and would har consumers.

Accordingly, Respondent's Motion should be denied.

Dated: Januar 28, 2009 Respectfully submitted,

flol: fl~ÁC

Complaint Counsel

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvana Ave, NW (H-374)

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: (202) 326-2008

Facsimile: (202) 326-2214
CERTIFICA TE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 28,2009 I filed via hand and electronic mail delivery an

original and two copies of the foregoing Response to Respondent's Motion for Leave to File

Reply Brief with:

Donald S. Clark, Secretar

Office of the Secretar

Federal Trade Commssion

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Rm. H-135

Washington, DC 20580

I hereby certify that on Januar 28,2009, I served via electronic mail and mail delivery a

copy of the foregoing Response to Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief with:

The Honorable D. Michael Chappell

Administrative Law Judge

Federal Trade Commssion

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, H-106

Washington, DC 20580

oali (gftc.gov

I hereby certify that on Januar 28,2009, I served via electronic mail delivery and first

class mail two copies of the foregoing Response to Respondent's Motion for Leave to File Reply

Brief with:

Willam L. Rikard, Jr., Esq.

Eric D. Welsh, Esq.

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein, LLP

401 South Tryon Street, Suite 3000

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

wiliamkard (gparkerpoe.com

ericwelsh (gparkerpoe.com

, .r/"

By:i: Ititt'7áiuV:

Linda Cunningha

Federal Trade Co ssion

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20580

Telephone: (202) 326-2638

1cunningham (gftc. gov
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection 

Bureau of Consumer Protection 

[Date] 

BY CERTIFIED MAIL 

[Company] 

RE: Privacy Policy Regarding APEC CBPR Participation 

Dear []: 

We are writing because the privacy policy on [Company]’s website indicates that [Company] is a 

participant in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (“APEC”) Cross-Border Privacy Rules 

(“CBPR”) system. The official CBPR website—www.cbprs.org—does not, however, include 

[Company] as a certified participant in the system. 

Before a company may participate in the APEC CBPR system, a designated third party known as 

an APEC-recognized Accountability Agent must review and certify that the company is 

compliant with the CBPR program requirements. The company would then have relevant details 

of its certification published on the official CBPR website. 

The FTC has brought several cases based on a company’s false claim of participation in an 

international privacy program, including the APEC CBPR system. These cases allege that such 

false claims deceive consumers in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. 

In an enforcement action brought under the Act, the FTC may also name as respondents any 

individuals who controlled, had the authority to control, or participated in the unlawful conduct. 

If your company has in fact undergone the review and certification required to support the claim 

of participation in the APEC CBPR system, please let us know within 45 days by contacting us 

at apec.cbpr@ftc.gov. Otherwise, your company should: (1) immediately remove from its 

website, privacy policy, and any other public documents, all representations that might be 

construed as claiming participation or involvement in the APEC CBPR system; and (2) contact 

us within 45 days at apec.cbpr@ftc.gov to confirm that you have done so. 

If your company would like to be a certified participant in the APEC CBPR system, please 

review the program’s requirements and take all necessary steps. Unless and until your company 

is certified, however, you should make no representation regarding participation or involvement 

in the APEC CBPR system. 

If we do not receive a timely and satisfactory response from you, we reserve the right to take 

appropriate legal action to protect the integrity of the APEC CBPR system. We appreciate your 

prompt attention to this matter. 
Sincerely, 

Maneesha Mithal 

Associate Director 

Division of Privacy and Identity Protection 

2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION***


**(Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officers of QSGI INC., hereby certify, to such officers’
knowledge, that:




(1)
      the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of QSGI INC. (the “Company”) for the
      period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                May 10, 2007
            
            /s/
                Marc ShermanMarc
                Sherman
              Chairman
                of the Board and
              Chief
                Executive OfficerDate:
                May 10, 2007
            
            /s/
                Edward L. CummingsEdward
                L. Cummings
              Chief
                Financial Officer and Treasurer




__________________


*
      The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a) OR 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Rodney Sacks, certify that:

 

1.            I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Monster Beverage Corporation; and

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date:  | April 13, 2017 | /s/Rodney   C. Sacks                                             |   |
|--------|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                | Rodney   C. Sacks                                                |
|   |                | Chairman of the   Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  636,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                   306,172
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               543,580
<PP&E>                                         233,816
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,233,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          856,014
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,275
<COMMON>                                         6,742
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,954,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,233,815
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               717,630
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,254,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,536,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,536,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,536,709)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.32)
























</TABLE>
254 La. 851

#### SUCCESSION of Mrs. Lucille McGimsey ROBINSON.

No. 50099.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Ruth Sheffield applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 225 So.2d 149.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
53 

OFFlCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

/ 

Hon. E. P. Jannbuy 

county imlltar 

F?liln oounty 

xountzs, Texas 

Dear Sir: ,! Jl 

This will a0 

of June 19th. ask%x& t 

rouaring fpetio~la 

t or your letter 

ur oplallaa oa the 

fn a resent opinfon [opinbm Ro, O-909) *I held 

IL R. fm5 passed by the l?isFtg-$ixth xdt&lature rt sic 

reently addjour@ed seaelonS5 #a a valti and aerm?ilrUtiaaal 

. We else enaloee a dp oi this apinionr 

I 
5 

IIon.E.P.Jenninge, Page 2 

Ixumauah as Zrtlals 1055 was operative as 

oodlfied In the revision of 19eS until amaded by H. 8. 

205, supm, and did not provide for any payment to Otisoers where prisoners satisfied their rmpeotlve fine8 and 

coats by mere jail conflncment without labor 6s palded 

In Art1019 1055, aupra, your qufmtlnn 16 answered In the 

negativs. Offlaera would lie entitled to their foes aa 

provided In Ii, EL 205, supra, from and after ttur effeotire 

datd only. 

Yours rery tnlly 

ATTORI% GENEFtAL OF TEXAS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          62,749
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,747,065
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,747,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,573
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,747,065
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,427
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,660
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### The TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. George DALEO and John Dubois, Respondents.

No. 43373.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 11, 1973.

David L. Willing of Adams, George & Wood and Jeanne Heyward, Miami, for petitioner.

Alan R. Schwartz of Horton, Schwartz & Perse and Sams, Anderson, Alper, Spencer & Post, Miami, for respondents.

PER CURIAM:

Petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Respondent’s petition for attorney’s fees is denied. *See*Wilder v. Wright, 278 So.2d 1 (Fla.1973).

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Order entered January 3 , 20 20

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 01554 - CV IN RE LEVY PREMIUM F OOD SERVICE, LLC D/B /A LEVY RESTAURANTS, Relator

O riginal Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 18 - 06335 - A



### O RDER Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Evans Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11

DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 29, 2000

                                                                       Per Share

                                          Net Income     Shares      Amount
                                          ----------     ------    ---------

        Basic Earnings Per Share:

        Income available to common
            shareholders                  $3,294,141    7,799,511     $.42
                                          ----------   ----------     ====


        Effect of Dilutive Securities:

        Warrants                                --         11,570

        Options                                 --        356,797
                                          ----------   ----------     ----


        Diluted Earnings Per Share        $3,294,141    8,167,878     $.40
                                          ==========   ==========     ====
NUVA-EX10.21-2013-10K


Exhibit 10.21


NuVasive, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Cash Compensation 
Non-employee directors receive fees from the Company for their services as members of the Board and any committee of the Board. We pay our non-employee directors cash retainers and make equity award grants for their service on the Board. All directors own shares of our common stock. No director compensation is paid to any director who is also an employee of the Company. The following table sets forth the non-employee director compensation schedule effective July 1, 2013: 
 
	
		
	 
	 

	Position
 
	Annual
Retainer 
 

	Board
	$50,000

	Lead Independent Director*
	$15,000

	Audit Committee
	$15,000

	Chairperson of Audit Committee*
	$20,000

	Nominating and Governance Committee
	$5,000

	Chairperson of Nominating and Governance Committee*
	$10,000

	Compensation Committee
	$10,000

	Chairperson of the Compensation Committee*
	$15,000






		
	*
	Lead Independent Director and Committee Chair retainers are in addition to the member retainer