alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated Balance Sheets, consolidated Statements of Income and Notes
to the consolidated financial statements on pages  through   of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1998
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statments.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             215
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                        38
<INVENTORY>                                      1,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,712
<PP&E>                                           5,902
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,032
<BONDS>                                          3,210
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        368
<COMMON>                                           779
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,891
<SALES>                                          4,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,137
<CGS>                                            3,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 198
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    259
<INCOME-TAX>                                        92
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                167
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       167
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The(EPS-PRIMARY) amount represents BASIC earnings per share and the
(EPS-DILUTED) amount represents DILUTED earnings per share in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per
Share.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### BOB BURKE, INC., et al. v. Monroe N. FLENIKEN et ux.

No. 60233.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: Monroe N. Fleniken, et ux. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 346 So.2d 754.

Writ Denied: No error of law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
DATAMETRICS CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JULY 26, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-26-1998
<CASH>                                             620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,314
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,277
<PP&E>                                           7,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,472
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,203
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           155
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,472
<SALES>                                          6,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,196
<CGS>                                            4,137
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,137
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,768)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   ($.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   ($.12)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7398 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7398

 To establish the Western Emergency Refined Petroleum Products Reserve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2020

Mr. Bishop of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish the Western Emergency Refined Petroleum Products Reserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF WESTERN EMERGENCY REFINED PETROLEUM 
              PRODUCTS RESERVE.

    (a) Establishment.--The Secretary of Defense, acting through the 
Director of the Defense Logistics Agency, shall establish a reserve, to 
be known as the ``Western Emergency Refined Petroleum Products 
Reserve'' (in this section referred to as the ``Reserve''), to store 
refined petroleum products that may be made available to military and 
governmental entities during an emergency situation, as determined 
appropriate by the Secretary of Defense.
    (b) Use of Reserve.--In accordance with subsection (a), the 
Secretary of Defense may make refined petroleum products stored in the 
Reserve available to other Federal agencies, State and local 
governments, and any other public entity determined appropriate by the 
Secretary of Defense.
    (c) Location.--The Reserve shall--
            (1) be located in the western region of the United States;
            (2) utilize salt cavern storage; and
            (3) be in immediate proximity to existing pipeline, rail, 
        and highway infrastructure.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 25, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Lawrence
E. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ LAWRENCE E. HYATT
---------------------
Lawrence E. Hyatt
Chief Financial Officer
March 10, 2006
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3468]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Supplementary Agreement on Social Security Between the United 
States and Austria; Entry Into Force

    The Commissioner of Social Security gives notice that a 
supplementary agreement entered into force on January 1, 1997, which 
amends the Social Security agreement between the United States (U.S.) 
and Austria that has been in effect since November 1, 1991. The 
supplementary agreement, which was signed on October 5, 1995, was 
concluded pursuant to section 233 of the Social Security Act.
    The supplementary agreement amends the original agreement to update 
and clarify several of its provisions. The most important of these 
amendments introduces a new method of computing Austrian benefits under 
the agreement. The new computation method replaces a provision in the 
original agreement that would have resulted in reduced Austrian Social 
Security benefits for certain individuals who have divided their 
careers between the U.S. and Austria. This reduction provision was 
scheduled to take effect on November 1, 1996 (5 years after the 
effective date of the original agreement) but, as a result of the 
supplementary agreement, it will not be implemented.
    Individuals who wish to obtain copies of the supplementary 
agreement or want general information about its provisions may write to 
the Social Security Administration, Office of International Policy, 
Post Office Box 17741, Baltimore, Maryland 21235. Individuals who wish 
to obtain information about how the new computation method will affect 
their Austrian benefits should write to the Main Association of 
Austrian Social Insurance Agencies (Hauptverband der Oesterreichischen 
Sozialversicherungstraeger), Kundmanngasse 21, 1030 Vienna, AUSTRIA.

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Shirley S. Chater,
Commissioner of Social Security.
[FR Doc. 97-3468 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4890-29-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 95-ACE-17]


Proposed Alteration of Class E Airspace at Muscatine, IA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration [FAA], DOT.

ACTION: Proposed rule, withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) 
which proposed to change the Class E airspace area at Muscatine, IA. 
The NPRM is being withdrawn due to the delay in the installation of the 
Port City Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range/Distance Measuring 
Equipment (VOR/DME).

DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn February 20, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Randolph, Operations Branch, ACE-530C, Federal Aviation 
Administration, 601 E. 12th St., Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Proposed Rule

    On December 20, 1995 (60 FR 65601), a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 
was published in the Federal Register to change the Class E airspace at 
Muscatine, IA. The delay in obtaining the necessary equipment has 
resulted in delaying the installation and commissioning of the VOR/DME 
until late 1997 or early 1998.

Conclusion

    In consideration of the aforementioned delay in installation and 
commissioning of the Port City VOR/DME, action is being taken to 
withdraw the proposed amendment of the Class E airspace area at 
Muscatine, IA. If necessary, a new NPRM will be prepared at a later 
date.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Withdrawal of Proposed Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Airspace 
Docket No. 95-ACE-17, as published in the Federal Register on December 
20, 1995 (60 FR 65601), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 
9565, 3 CFR 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 14 CFR 11.69.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 27, 1997.
Herman J. Lyons, Jr.,
Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 97-3747 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 10.1 Mar 2014 Promotion Letter - Tara






Exhibit 10.1



February 5, 2014




Tara Nickerson




Tara -
I am very pleased to inform you of your promotion to Chief Business Officer, effective March 1, 2014.  In this new role, we expect that you will contribute significantly to the advancement of our business and achievement of our goals in 2014 and beyond.
In addition to the change in title and responsibilities, your promotion may impact certain of Prothena’s compensation and benefits plans:
		
	•
	Your annual bonus opportunity under the Prothena Corporation plc Incentive Compensation Plan will remain 40% of annual salaried-earnings


		
	•
	Your Tier level under the Prothena Biosciences Inc Amended and Restated Severance Plan moves from Tier 2 (Leadership II) to Tier 1 (Leadership I) - further details are attached




On behalf of the Board of Directors and Leadership Team, I thank you for the work you’ve put in to earn this promotion, and I look forward to your continued success here at Prothena.


Sincerely,


/s/ Dale B. Schenk
Dale B. Schenk
President and Chief Executive Officer










Your employment remains “at will.”  This means that you and Prothena each have the right to terminate the employment relationship at any time, with or without cause.  Nothing in this letter should be taken as a guarantee of continued employment or a specific term of employment.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1266** 

CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. STEPHEN RYAN; JUDGE ARTHUR MCFARLAND , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court f or the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. ( 3:09

- cv - 03271

- PMD )

Submitted : July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denyin g relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Ryan , No. 3:09

- cv - 03271

- PMD (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 2010) . We dispense wit h oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sypris Solutions, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, in his capacity as an officer of Sypris Solutions, Inc., that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |     |  |                                         
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 14, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey T. Gill                     
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Jeffrey T. Gill                         
|      |  |                |  |     |  | President & Chief Executive Officer     
|      |  |                | 
|Date: |  | March 14, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ T. Scott Hatton                     
|      |  |                |  |     |  | T. Scott Hatton                         
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sypris Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Sypris Solutions,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 4, 2016














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.





(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)








Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))








---




Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of March 31, 2016 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$11,991Sub-advised funds624Institutional accounts4,776Total$17,391





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,753Small-Mid Cap2,506Large Cap7,682Select (All Cap)521Long-Short4,507Corporate Credit422Total$17,391








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:April 4, 2016By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
259 La. 791

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Donner J. LeBLANC v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51775.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 13, 1971.

In re: Donner J. LeBlanc applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ granted. See Order.

On considering the petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered cause,

It Is Ordered that the Judges of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson set aside the plea of guilty and sentence of the relator, see Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).

It Is Further Ordered that in the event the Judges of the Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court fail to comply with this order within ten (10) days from this date, that the respondent Judges show cause to the contrary in this Court on the tenth day of November, 1971 at 11:00 o’clock A.M.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-1170-000]


Bangor Hydro Electric Company; Notice of Filing

February 20, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 31, 1996, Bangor Hydro Electric 
Company tendered for filing a Pro Forma Open Access Transmission 
Tariff. Bangor Hydro states that this submittal is to remove higher 
voltage network facilities from its tariff.
    Any Person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before February 27, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4721 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### The CITY OF ORLANDO et al., Plaintiffs, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, et al., Defendants.

No. 77-1702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 20, 1978.

Gretchen R. H. Vose, Asst. City Atty., Orlando, for plaintiffs.

Andrew B. Thomas and John W. Bowen of Rowland, Petruska & Bowen, Orlando, for defendants.

MOORE, Judge.

This case is before us upon two certified questions propounded to us by the Circuit Court of the Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida. The questions are:

> 1. Whether the use of public school property located within the city limits and within the school district is subject in any manner to city zoning ordinances.

> 2. If the above question is answered in the affirmative, what procedural and judicial steps are to be followed in the resolution of land-use disputes between the School Board and the city.

With regard to the first question this Court has already decided the issue in *Village of North Palm Beach v. School Board of Palm Beach County,*349 So.2d 683 (Fla.4th DCA 1977). Unfortunately, the trial court did not have this decision available at the time he certified the questions to us. Nevertheless, we adhere to our ruling in the *Village of North Palm Beach*case and accordingly answer the first question in the affirmative.

With regard to the second question we find that it does not fall within Rule 4.6, Fla.R.App.P. (1962 Revision) in that our answer, if given, would not be determinative of the cause. Accordingly, we decline to answer the second question. *Chapman v. Slaff,*101 So.2d 413 (Fla.1st DCA 1958); 2 Fla.Jur., “Appeals,” Section 433.

DOWNEY, C. J., and LETTS, J., concur.