8446 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Notices

compliance monitoring program to be

implemented when selected controls are

completed. OMB’s approval of the

initial ICR for the CSO Control Policy

recommended that the renewal ICR

include EPA’s best estimate of the

burden associated with a reasonable and

targeted compliance monitoring

program.

An agency may not conduct or

sponsor, and a person is not required to

respond to, a collection of information

unless it displays a currently valid OMB

control number. The OMB control

numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed

in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter

15.

The EPA would like to solicit

comments on its ICR amendment.

Specifically, we would like comments

to help us to:

(i) evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the Agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

(ii) evaluate the accuracy of the

Agency’s estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(iv) minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond.

Burden Statement: The estimated

burden reflected in this ICR is 1,861,528

hours and a cost of $58,737,887.

Of this total, the portion for

municipalities with combined sewer

systems is 1,774,319 hours at a cost of

$55,975,099, including start-up costs of

$180,080 for the third party notification

under the Nine Minimum Controls

(NMC) in the CSO policy. The estimated

burden on each of 238 municipalities

for DMR reporting and recordkeeping is

291 hours and $9,219. The estimated

burden on each of 570 municipalities

for NMC reporting and long-term

control plan development and

submission is 2,978 hours and $93,598

and for third-party notification, 24

hours and $756.

The estimated burden for Federal and

State governments is 8896.5 hours and

$281,844 and 78,312.5 hours and

$2,480,944, respectively. This includes

the burden associated with reviewing

the DMRs, the NMC documentations,

and the long-term control plans

submitted by the respondents and

reissuing NPDES permits or issuing

other enforceable mechanisms to

municipalities with CSSs to implement

the CSO Control Policy. The annual

average burden for Federal and State

review of DMRs, NMC documentations,

and long-term control plans is 2,445.5

hours and $77,475 and 21,157.5 hours

and $670,271, respectively. The annual

average burden associated with

reissuing NPDES permits or issuing

other enforceable mechanisms to CSO

municipalities is 520 hours and $16,474

for the Federal government and 4,547

hours and $144,039 for State

governments.

The estimated burden on the States to

report summary information to EPA for

oversight of the EPA’s CSO Control

Policy and for GPRA purposes is 1,200

hours and $38,016.

Burden means the total time, effort, or

financial resources expended by persons

to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose

or provide information to or for a

Federal agency. This includes the time

needed to review instructions; develop,

acquire, install, and utilize technology

and systems for the purposes of

collecting, validating, and verifying

information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing

and providing information; adjust the

existing ways to comply with any

previously applicable instructions and

requirements; train personnel to be able

to respond to a collection of

information; search data sources;

complete and review the collection of

information; and transmit or otherwise

disclose the information.

Interested parties may obtain a copy

of the draft supporting statement,

including the burden analysis, from

Timothy Dwyer, EPA Office of

Wastewater Management, at (202) 260–

6064.

Dated: February 14, 1997.

Michael B. Cook,

Director, Office of Wastewater Management.

[FR Doc. 97–4617 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

[FRL–5693–7]

Notice of Proposed Assessment of

Clean Water Act Class II Administrative

Penalty to Golden City Gateway and

Opportunity To Comment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed

administrative penalty assessment and

opportunity to comment.

SUMMARY: EPA is providing notice of

proposed administrative penalty

assessment and proposed Consent

Agreement for alleged violations of the

Clean Water Act. EPA is also providing

notice of opportunity to comment on the

proposed assessment.

Under 33 U.S.C. Section 1319(g), EPA

is authorized to issue orders assessing

civil penalties for various violations of

the Act. EPA may issue these orders

after the commencement of either a

Class I or Class II penalty proceeding.

EPA provides public notice of the

proposed assessments pursuant to 33

U.S.C. Section 1319(g)(4)(a).

Class II proceedings are conducted

under EPA’s Consolidated Rules of

Practice Governing the Administrative

Assessment of Civil Penalties and the

Revocation and Suspension of Permits,

40 C.F.R. Part 22. The procedures

through which the public may submit

written comment on a proposed Class II

order or participate in a Class II

proceeding, and the Procedures by

which a Respondent may request a

hearing, are set forth in the

Consolidated Rules. The deadline for

submitting public comment on a

proposed Class II order is thirty days

after publication of this notice.

On the date identified below, EPA

commenced the following Class II

proceeding for the assessment of

penalties:

In the Matter of Golden City Gateway, Ca

Limited Partnership, 711 Church Hill Rd La

Habra Hts. Ca 90061; EPA Docket No. CWA–

IX–FY97–11; filed on Febraury 18, 1997,

with Mr. Steven Armsey, Regional Hearing

Clerk, U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne

Street, San Francisco, California 94105, (415)

744–1389, proposed penalty of $40,000 for

failure to comply with the California General

Stormwater Permit for Construction

Activities. EPA and Golden City Gateway

have agreed to a proposed Consent

Agreement in which Golden City Gateway

shall pay a civil penalty of $40,000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Persons wishing to receive a copy of

EPA’s Consolidated Rules, review of the

complaint or other documents filed in

this proceeding, comment upon a

proposed assessment, or otherwise

participate in the proceeding should

contact the Regional Hearing Clerk

identified above. The administrative

record for this proceeding is located in

the EPA Regional Office identified

above, and the file will be open for

public inspection during normal

business hours. All information

submitted by the respondent is available

as part of this administrative record,

subject to provisions of law restricting

public disclosure of confidential

information. In order to provide

opportunity for public comment, EPA

will issue no final order assessing a

penalty in these proceedings prior to

thirty (30) days after the date of

publication of this notice.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 37 / Tuesday, February 25, 1997 / Notices 8447

Dated: January 31, 1997.

John Ong,

Acting Director, Water Management Division.

[FR Doc. 97–4616 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

Notice of Public Information

Collections Being Reviewed by the

Federal Communications Commission

February 19, 1997.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commissions, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following information collection, as

required by the Paperwork Reduction

Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13. An

agency may not conduct or sponsor a

collection of information unless it

displays a currently valid control

number. No person shall be subject to

any penalty for failing to comply with

a collection of information subject to the

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that

does not display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commission’s

burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarify of the

information collected; and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

DATES: Persons wishing to comment on

this information collection should

submit comments April 28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to

Dorothy Conway, Federal

Communications Commissions, Room

234, 1919 M St., N.W., Washington, DC

20554 or via internet to

dconway@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collections contact Dorothy

Conway at 202–418–0217 or via internet

at dconway@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Approval Number: 3060–XXXX.

Title: Marketing of RF Devices Prior to

Equipment Authorization (Section

2.803).

Form No.: None.

Type of Review: New Collection.

Respondents: Business/For Profit

Institutions.

Number of Respondents: 6,000.

Estimated time per response: .5.

Total annual burden: 3,000.

Needs and Uses: FCC rules permit the

display and advertising of radio

frequency devices prior to equipment

authorization or a determination of

compliance with the rules, providing

that the advertising or display contains

a conspicuous notice as specified by the

rules. The notice that must be displayed

is defined in Section 2.803(c). A notice

that applies specifically to prototype

equipment is defined in Section

2.803(c)(1). In addition, as defined in

Section 2.803(c)(2) any RF device that is

offered for sale to specific entities

defined in the rule part, prior to

equipment authorization or a showing

of compliance, must be accompanied by

a written notice that the equipment is

subject to the FCC rules and will

comply with all FCC rules prior to

delivery. The information is disclosed to

third parties to ensure that they are fully

aware of the FCC’s requirement for the

responsible party to fully comply with

the Commission Rules.

Federal Communications Commission.

William F. Caton,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–4503 Filed 2–24–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P

Notice of Public Information

Collections Being Reviewed by FCC

For Extension Under Delegated

Authority 5 CFR 1320 Authority,

Comments Requested

February 19, 1997.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications

Commission, as part of its continuing

effort to reduce paperwork burden

invites the general public and other

Federal agencies to take this

opportunity to comment on the

following proposed and/or continuing

information collections, as required by

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,

Public Law 104–13. An agency may not

conduct or sponsor a collection of

information unless it displays a

currently valid control number. No

person shall be subject to any penalty

for failing to comply with a collection

of information subject to the Paperwork

Reduction Act (PRA) that does not

display a valid control number.

Comments are requested concerning (a)

whether the proposed collection of

information is necessary for the proper

performance of the functions of the

Commission, including whether the

information shall have practical utility;

(b) the accuracy of the Commissions

burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance

the quality, utility, and clarity of the

information collected and (d) ways to

minimize the burden of the collection of

information on the respondents,

including the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology.

The FCC is reviewing the following

information collection requirements for

possible 3-year extension under

delegated authority 5 CFR 1320,

authority delegated to the Commission

by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB).

DATES: Written comments should be

submitted on or before April 28, 1997.

If you anticipate that you will be

submitting comments, but find it

difficult to do so within the period of

time allowed by this notice, you should

advise the contact listed below as soon

as possible.

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments to

Dorothy Conway, Federal

Communications Commission, Room

234, 1919 M St., N.W., Washington, DC

20554 or via internet to

dconway@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

additional information or copies of the

information collections contact Dorothy

Conway at 202–418–0217 or via internet

at dconway@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

OMB Approval Number: 3060–0017.

Title: Application for a Low Power

TV, TV Translator or TV Booster Station

License .

Form Number: FCC 347.

Type of Review: Extension of

currently approved collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit, state, local or tribal government.

Number of Respondents: 400.

Estimated time per response: 2.5

hours.

Total annual burden: 1000 hours.

Needs and Uses: FCC Form 347 is

required to be filed when applying for

a Low Power Television, TV Translator

or TV Booster Station License. This

form will be revised to add the new

requirements regarding antenna tower

registration. This unique antenna

registration number identifies an

antenna structure and must be used on

all filings related to the antenna

structure. Several questions will be

added to the engineering portion of the

FCC 350 to collect this information.

This requirement was approved by OMB

under control number 3060–0714. The

data is used by FCC staff to confirm that

the station has been built to terms

specified in the outstanding