UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

DRAFT BIOLOGICAL OPINIONS ISSUED UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT, BY THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, RELATED TO PESTICIDES AND

PACIFIC SALMON AND STEELHEAD SPECIES

COMMENTS ACCEPTED THROUGH APRIL 30, 2012

EPA has initiated formal consultation with th e National Marine Fish eries Service on the potential effects of certain pesticides to Pacific salmon and steelhead listed under the Endangered Species Act as either threatened or endangered. As EPA receives draft Biological Opinions relative to these consultations, they will be posted to www.epa.gov/espp and included in a public docket EPA-HQ-O PP-2008-0654 so EPA may receive public input on any changes to a pesticide’s registration recommended by the National Marine Fisheries

Service.

BACKGROUND The Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires that Federal Agencies assess their “actions” to determine whether species listed as threat ened or endangered under the ESA, may be affected by those actions, or whether crit ical habitat may be adversely modified. The registered uses of a pesticide constitute an EPA "action" under the ESA.

If EPA determines a pesticide's registered uses are likely to adversely affect a federally listed threatened or endangered species (listed species) or m odify its critical habitat, EPA

initiates "formal consultation" with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service (the Service or Services), as appropriate. In response to a Federal Agency initiating formal consultation, the Service(s) develops a Biological Opinion (BO) in which it provides its opinion on whether the "action" is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species or is likely to adversely modify designated critical habitat and, if so, describes alternatives to avoid jeopardy.

PUBLIC INPUT In 2005, EPA published in the Federal Re gister (FR 70 No. 211 pp. 66392-66402), a

document titled Endangered Species Protection Program Field Implementation . That notice of how EPA intends to implement its respon sibilities under the ESA, states (p 66401):

"If EPA must formally consult with the Se rvices, after the Services issue a draft Biological Opinion, EPA will welcom e input from State, Tribal and local
governments on draft reasonable and prudent measures and

alternatives . The purpose of this review would be to determine whether the alternatives or measures can be reasonably implemented and whether there are different measures that may provide adequate protection but result in less impact to pesticide users. The Agency will consider this input in developing itsresponse to draft Biological Opinions."

EPA also is seeking input from the public in general, pesticide users, and public interest organizations on whether the alternatives or measures can be reasonably implemented and whether there are different measures that may provide adequate protection but result in less impact to pesticide users. The Agency will also consider this input in developing its response to draft Biological Opinions.

APPLICANT INPUT Further, the Services’ Consultation Handbook (pp. 2-13), supports their consultation regulations and states:

“... the Service and the action agency meet their obligations to [the applicant or pesticide registrant] as outlined in 50 CFR section 402 through the following: The applicant is entitled to review draft Biological Opinions obtained through the action agency and to provide comments through the action agency. The Service will di scuss the basis of their biological determination with the applicant and seek the applicant’s expertise in identifying reasonable and prudent alternatives ...”.

COMMENTS Draft Biological Opinions are being includ ed in the docket (EPA- HQ-OPP-2008-0654) and posted to EPA’s Web site (http://www.epa.gov/oppf ead1/endanger/litstatus /effects) to seek input on the Service’s recommended reasonable and prudent measures and alternatives, as noted above. Such input should be submitted by April 30, 2012 . Comments received by

EPA will be forwarded to the Serv ice for their c onsideration.

As stated in the Services’ regulations (50 CFR 402.14(g)(5)):

“All comments on the draft Biological Opinion must be submitted to the Service through the Federal agency, although the applicant may send a copy of its comments directly to the Service.”

SUBMITTING YOUR COMMENTS You may submit your comments, identified by the docket identification (ID) number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0654 an d the pesticide to which the Biol ogical Opinion pertains, by one of the following methods:

Federal eRulemaking Portal : http://www.regulations.gov . Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.

Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Docke t, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.

Delivery: EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed

information.Instructions: EPA's policy is that all comments rece ived will be included in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at http://www.regulations.gov , including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or othe r information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-mail. The regulat ions.gov website is an ''anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact in formation unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic co mment, EPA recommends that you include yourname and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CDROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your co mment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any

defects or viruses.

Docket: All documents in the docket are list ed in the docket index available at http://www.regulations.gov . To access the electronic docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov , select ''Advanced Search,'' then ''Docket Search.'' Insert the

docket ID number where indicated and select the ''Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov website to view the docket index or access available documents. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov , or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Docket located in the EPA/DC, Room 3334, EPA West, 1301 Consti tution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room ho urs of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number of the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. EPA/DC visitors are required to show photogr aphic identification, pass through a metal detector, and sign the EPA visitor log. All visitor bags are processed through an X-ray machine and subject to search. Visitors will be provided an EPA/DC badge that must be visible at all times in the building and returned upon departure.