alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM GB FOODS
CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,130
<SECURITIES>                                     2,323
<RECEIVABLES>                                      697
<ALLOWANCES>                                       164
<INVENTORY>                                         41
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,948
<PP&E>                                           1,963
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              423
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           526
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,792
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,802
<SALES>                                          3,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,380
<CGS>                                            2,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    867
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                854
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       854
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
#### Danny Demar JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-340.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 7, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Warren S. Schwartz, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ronald A. Dion, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PEARSON, Judge.

The single point to be determined on this appeal is whether a trial judge may refuse to consider a pre-sentence investigation report mandated by Section 921.231, Florida Statutes (1975), and Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.710. We hold that a trial judge’s announcement, prior to sentencing and submission of the presentenee investigation report, that “. . . the Court is going to impose the same sentence regardless of the result of the presentence investigation” is a clear violation of the statute and rule, rendering the sentence illegal. We further hold that a defendant’s waiver of presentence investigation after the announcement by the trial judge that he will disregard the report is not a waiver of the illegality of the sentence.

Johnson was charged by information with two counts of attempted first degree murder and two counts of attempted second degree murder. He entered not guilty pleas and was tried before a jury.

At the conclusion of trial, the jury returned with a verdict of (1) guilty of the reckless display of a firearm as a lesser included offense under the charges of attempted first degree murder, (2) guilty of aggravated battery as a lesser included offense under one charge of attempted second degree murder and (3) not guilty of the other charge of attempted second degree murder.

Johnson, a first time offender, made a timely request for a presentence investigation. When the trial court announced that it would impose the same sentence regardless of the results of the presentence report, Johnson chose to be sentenced without the presentenee investigation report.

*858The trial court sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment on the aggravated battery charge with a minimum three years to be served before becoming eligible for parole. Johnson was also sentenced to two consecutive one year terms on the charges of the reckless display of a firearm. He now takes this belated appeal.

A reading of the language of the statute and rule reveals a clear intention that first offenders should have the benefit of a pre-sentence investigation and that trial judges should consider the report prior to sentencing. Therefore, a trial judge is not empowered to frustrate such intention by a prior announcement that he will not follow the statute and rule. See *Nordone v. State,*307 So.2d 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); *Angel v. State,*305 So.2d 283 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); and *Harden*v. *State,*290 So.2d 551 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). See also *Neal v. Bryant,*149 So.2d 529 (Fla.1962).

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed and the cause is remanded with directions to the trial court to order the preparation of a presentence investigation according to the statute and to consider the report prior to sentencing.

Reversed and remanded.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Nov ember 3, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00146

- CV

The Most Reverend Wm. Michael MULVEY , S.T.L., D.D. Bishop of Corpus Christi (Appellant/Cross

- Appellee), Appellant

v.

BAY, LTD . (Appellee/Cross

- Appellant),

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court

, Jim Wells Count y, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 09

- 51494

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Lori I. V alenz u ela , Justice

Appellee/cross

- appellant’s M otion for R ehearin g and Reconsideration En Banc is pending before the court. The court hereby requests a response t o the motion from the

app ellants/cross

- appellees

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2. Any response must be filed in this court no

later than ten days from the date of this order.

It is so O RDERED on November 3, 2 021.

PER CURIAM

ATTES TED TO:

_______________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, CLERK OF COURT
FILED DALLAS COUNTY 1/12/2015 10:07:08 AM FELICIA PITR E DISTRICT CLERK Bridgette Vation

NO. 13-12651-C

THE STATE OF TEXAS, () IN THE DISTRICT COURT () Plaintiff () () 

## vs. () OF DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS () ONE 2001 BMW X5, () () Defendant () 68TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CLAIMANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE COURT: COMES NOW, Claimant, Fernanda Devany , who filed an answer and appeared i n person in the trial of th is action and claimed ownership interest in the 2001 BMW X5 automobile , vehicle identification number WBAFB33561 LH25230 , Texas license number DSM305 that was found to be contraband liable to forfeiture to the State of Texas gives notice of her intent to appeal the trial court's judgment rendered on December 16 , 2014. This appeal is taken to the Fifth Court of Appeals in Dallas , Texas
.

NOT ICE OF APP EAL Respectfully subm itted /s/ Kevi n Kurtz Kevin Kurtz Attorney and Counselor at Law 3621 Mockingb ird Lane Dallas , Texas 75205 (214) 559-0505 Fax# (214) 559-0580 Email kevin@kurtzesq

.com State Bar No
. 11770500CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the above Notice ofAppeal has been sent to Plaintiff, The State of Texas at opposing cou nse l 's office at the Crim i nal District Attorney fo r Dalla s



### FA **~** 2.f'l · 

### (g.$'.3 .- t-1 

### "1S'f County Texas's office in the Frank Crow ley Criminal Courthouse via l:+aAEI deliv8ry o n the 9th day of January , 2015
.
Is/Kevin Kurtz Kevin Kurtz

N OTI CE O F AP P EAL
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William W. Boyle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCorporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
| /s/  W. W. Boyle                              |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| W. W. Boyle                                        |   |
| Senior Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                               |   |
| Date: February 5,  2008                       |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of NaturalNano, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cathy A. Fleischer, President and principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 

 
| Date:  April 9, 2008 | By:    | /s/Cathy A. Fleischer                                                     |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   | ________________________________

President (principal executive officer) |
|                 |   |                                                                      |
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

-1-

Decided and Entered: July 7, 2016 D-33-16 

 

In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN

VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW

§ 468-a.

COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANDARDS, ON MOTION

Petitioner;

RAJENDRANATH JANKI AKALU,

Respondent.

(Attorney Registration No. 4032272)

 

Calendar Date: March 28, 2016

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Mulvey, JJ.

 

Monica A. Duffy, Committee on Professional Standards,

Albany, for petitioner.

Rajendranath Janki Akalu, Ajax, Canada, respondent pro se.

 

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in

2002, was suspended by this Court's order dated January 30, 2014

for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements

of Judiciary Law § 468-a (113 AD3d 1020 [2014]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he

has complied with the attorney registration requirements of

Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of

the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object
-2- D-33-16 

to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and he is ordered

reinstated, effective immediately.

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Rose, Lynch and Mulvey, JJ.

concur.

ORDERED that respondent's application is granted; and it is

further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and

counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
#### Kenneth C. McCANDLESS and Roberta Grace McCandless, Appellants, v. N. R. BRYANT, Appellee.

No. 74-29.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 14, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                               Dean Foods Company
                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                  (In Millions)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                13 Weeks Ended
                                                August 27, 2000
                                                ---------------
<S>                                             <C>
Income before taxes                                $42.7
                                                   -----

 Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                                 17.5
   Portion of rentals (33%)                          4.2
                                                   -----

   Total fixed charges                              21.7
                                                   -----

 Earnings before taxes and  fixed charges          $64.4
                                                   =====

 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  3.0
                                                   =====
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned, in his or her capacity as an officer Cubic Corporation
(the "Registrant") hereby certifies that:

1.  The quarterly report of the Registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
    June 30,2002 (the "Report"), which accompanies this certification, fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934.

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition of the Registrant at the end of such
    quarter and the results of operations of the Registrant for such quarter.

/s/ W. J. ZABLE                                 /s/ W. W. BOYLE
--------------------------                      --------------------------------
W. J. Zable                                     W. W. Boyle
Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 13, 2002
[[Contact:26]] Page 1

_________________________________________ _____________________________________ Confirmation: I confirm that the information above is __ correct ___ correct w ith the changes noted above. Signature: ___________________________________ CONTACT REPORT Person Calling: Keith Barnett and Steve Fruh

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency OAQPS/ESD/OCG 919

- 541

- 5605 Person Called: Jim Pew

Earthjustice Date of Contact: September 2, 2009 Contact Summary : This call was in response to an email received from Mr. Pew on September 1, 2009 (Attached)[[Contact:26]] Page 2

___________________

___________________________________________________________ Confirmation: I confirm that the information above is __ correct ___ correct w ith the changes noted above. Signature: ___________________________________ From: James Pew <jpew@earthjustice.org> To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 09/01/2009 06:29 PM Subject: THC letter

Hi Keith
- I hope you're doing well. Has the 114 letter for THC data gone out yet, and can you send me a copy? Jim Jam es S. Pew Staff Attorney Earthjustice 1625 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Wa shington, D.C. 20036 (202) 667
- 4500 (phone) (202) 667
- 2356 (fax)
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 1, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2389 Lower Tribunal No. F14-20634

________________ 

### Armon J. Everett , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge Armon J. Everett, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the periodic report of Restoration Hardware, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endedFebruary 2, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gary G. Friedman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes ofTitle 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. 

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Date: April 17, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33784]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary of Defense


Meeting of the DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Working Group C (Electro-Optics) of the DoD Advisory Group on 
Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 0900, Wednesday and Thursday, 
January 21-22, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Palisades Institute for Research 
Services, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elise Rabin, AGED Secretariat, 1745 Jefferson Davis Highway, Crystal 
Square Four, Suite 500, Arlington, Virginia 22202.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and 
Technology, to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering 
(DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced 
Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and 
managing an effective and economical research and development program 
in the area of electron devices.
    The Working Group C meeting will be limited to review of research 
and development programs which the Military Departments propose to 
initiate with industry, universities or in their laboratories. This 
opto-electronic device area includes such programs as imaging device, 
infrared detectors and laser. The review will include details of 
classified defense programs throughout.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended 
(5 U.S.C. App. section 10(d)(1944)), it has been determined that this 
Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(1)(1944), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

    Dated: December 22, 1997.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-33784 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2021

No. 04-21-00251-CV

Herbert L. POLINARD, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

Jo Ann KARAMBIS, Maragaret Comparin, Ronaldo Dunagan, Lynda C. Spence, and EXP 

Realty LLC,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-11887

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On July 8, 2021, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, notifying this court 

that the clerk’s record has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make 

arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record based on the recalculated, corrected 

costs.

 It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide proof to this court within ten (10) days 

of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. 

 It is further ORDERED that the clerk’s record must be filed no later than ten (10) days 

after the date appellant’s written proofs are filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond 

within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 4.08
 
        Base Salary




---



##### 



2009 STIP
  Special Integration Bonus
   Share Option Plan (SOP)
    Mining Companies Comparative Plan (MCCP)
    2008 Annual Bonus Deferral
 2




---



##### 



Rio Tinto retirement annuity, Alcan Pension Plan (APP) and the Alcan Supplemental Retirement
Benefit Plan (ASRBP), Alcan Pension Plan for Officers (APPO)
    Deferred Compensation Plan (USA)
  Flexperks
 Ms.
Diane Robert, Benefits Administrator  P&OS, at (514) 848-8477.
 Expense account
  Alcan Inc. Quebec Medical Program
  Alcan Life Insurance Program
  3




---



##### 



Alcan Employee Savings Plan (AESP)
  Vacation Payment
  Tax equalization & Tax support
   Repatriation
  Other employment
  Terms and Conditions
  4




---



##### 



Tom Albanese
 5