DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYAL

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

ABLE ETHICAL EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RE

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

Y ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUST

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE E

ILITY DEDICATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEG

DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYAL

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

L EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE C

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

Y ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUST

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSCIENTIOUS EXCELLENCE

ILITY DEDICATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY SAFETY QUALITY INTEG

DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY CONSCIENTIOUS ET

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

L EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE C

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

ABLE LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPEND

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE E

ILITY DEDICATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY SAFETY QUALITY INTEG

DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE CONSCIENTIOUS

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYAL

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

L EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE C

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

Y ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUST

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE E

ILITY DEDICATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY SAFETY QUALITY INTEG
In fiscal 2007, the remaining $25.0 million of convertible 

notes were converted into 5.3 million shares of Common Stock.

The remaining debt relates primarily to a deferred payment 

obligation on an acquisition, which will be paid in March 2008.

For the second consecutive year, there were no amounts 

outstanding under the senior credit facility at year end.We

believe our $75.0 million revolving line of credit provides 

us with sufficient liquidity for future growth.

LE DEPENDABLE 

DIBILITY DEDICA

CT REPUTABLE D

HICAL CONSISTE

INTEGRITY CON

NTIOUS ETHICAL 

LE RESPECT EXC

NT CREDIBILITY 

NDABLE REPUTA

BLE TRUSTWOR

DIBILITY DEDICA

CT REPUTABLE D

HICAL CONSCIEN

INTEGRITY SAF

NTIOUS ETHICAL 

2005 204 235

Construction ServicesRepair & Maintenance Services

2006 244 250

2007 366 274

REVENUE (millions)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

2005 -2.24

2006 0.35

2007 0.74

FULLY DILUTED EPS

-2.50 -2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00

2005 30.0

2006 25.0

2007 4.3

DEBT (millions)

10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

Senior Credit FacilityConvertible NotesOther Debt

70.0 80.0 90.0

42.8 6.3

5.3

2005 15

2006 230

2007 314

BACKLOG (millions)

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

201

18

0

43

Construction ServicesRepair & Maintenance Services

Backlog has continued to increase and is $56.4 million at

May 31, 2007, an increase of $108.0 million, or 43.5% from

May 31, 2006. The increase occurred despite recognizing a

record amount of backlog into revenue in fiscal 2007. New 

contracts increased from $355.1 million in fiscal 2006 to

$550.3 million in fiscal 2007. We continue to see strong 

demand for our services and bid activity remains high.

Fiscal 2007 earnings were at record levels due to 

strong revenues and margins in both segments resulting 

in record gross profit. Lower interest costs also 

contributed to the improvement in fiscal 2007 earnings as

both the debt level and interest rates were reduced.

Revenue was at an all-time high in fiscal 2007.

Construction Services revenue increased $122.4 million,

or 50.2% from fiscal 2006.The increase was primarily 

due to an exceptional year in downstream petroleum 

and aboveground storage tank revenues.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

OUR To be a wservices, aOUR To create sfor our invproviding tmaintenan
In fiscal 2007, the remaining $25.0 million of convertible 

notes were converted into 5.3 million shares of Common Stock.

The remaining debt relates primarily to a deferred payment 

obligation on an acquisition, which will be paid in March 2008.

For the second consecutive year, there were no amounts 

outstanding under the senior credit facility at year end.We

believe our $75.0 million revolving line of credit provides 

us with sufficient liquidity for future growth.

LE DEPENDABLE 

DIBILITY DEDICA

CT REPUTABLE D

HICAL CONSISTE

INTEGRITY CON

NTIOUS ETHICAL 

LE RESPECT EXC

NT CREDIBILITY 

NDABLE REPUTAB

BLE TRUSTWOR

DIBILITY DEDICA

CT REPUTABLE D

HICAL CONSCIEN

INTEGRITY SAF

NTIOUS ETHICAL 

2005 204 235

Construction ServicesRepair & Maintenance Services

2006 244 250

2007 366 274

REVENUE (millions)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

2005 -2.24

2006 0.35

2007 0.74

FULLY DILUTED EPS

-2.50 -2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00

2005 30.0

2006 25.0

2007 4.3

DEBT (millions)

10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0

Senior Credit FacilityConvertible NotesOther Debt

70.0 80.0 90.0

42.8 6.3

5.3

2005 15

2006 230

2007 314

BACKLOG (millions)

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

201

18

0

43

Construction ServicesRepair & Maintenance Services

Backlog has continued to increase and is $56.4 million at

May 31, 2007, an increase of $108.0 million, or 43.5% from

May 31, 2006. The increase occurred despite recognizing a

record amount of backlog into revenue in fiscal 2007. New 

contracts increased from $355.1 million in fiscal 2006 to

$550.3 million in fiscal 2007. We continue to see strong 

demand for our services and bid activity remains high.

Fiscal 2007 earnings were at record levels due to 

strong revenues and margins in both segments resulting 

in record gross profit. Lower interest costs also 

contributed to the improvement in fiscal 2007 earnings as

both the debt level and interest rates were reduced.

Revenue was at an all-time high in fiscal 2007.

Construction Services revenue increased $122.4 million,

or 50.2% from fiscal 2006.The increase was primarily 

due to an exceptional year in downstream petroleum 

and aboveground storage tank revenues.

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

OUR To be a woservices, anOUR To create sfor our inveproviding thmaintenanc
E RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMITM

COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPE

EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOU

CATION OUR MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE C

ILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT DEDIC

PONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPEND

NSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY INTEGRITY RE

ABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENC

RUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY INTEGRITY RE

EPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMITMENT CREDIB

REVIEW OF FISCAL 2007On behalf of the Board of Directors and the Company, we are pleased to report that Matrix Service was very successful in exceedingour key objectives for this year and positioning the Company to grow our business.The first objective was to exit the fiscal 2006 turnaround situation, returning the Company to financial stability and position theCompany for long-term growth. We are very pleased to report significant improvements in operating results, financial position andliquidity. Secondly, we knew we needed to make significant investments in our employees. Our commitment to hiring, developing and retaining a skilled workforce was our top initiative coming into fiscal 2007. Attracting and retaining high quality employees isimportant to the continued success of our Company. We have expanded our Professional Development Program for project managers,have added several new craft recruiters in various regions throughout the United States and have expanded our support and operatinginfrastructure throughout the United States. We’ve also commenced our expansion into new areas of Canada. For the year, we successfully increased our workforce from approximately 2,100 employees at May 31, 2006 to 3,100 employees at May 31, 2007,which was critical to our ability to grow and service our customers.Additionally, we knew we needed to make significant investments in assets to allow our employees to capitalize on opportunitiesahead of us.We initially established a capital budget of $9 million, but increased our capital budget during the year as our growthexceeded expectations. Our actual capital expenditures totaled $13 million, primarily for construction and transportation equipment.Finally, we believed the strong market dynamics in the Downstream Petroleum Industry and our financial and operating position wouldallow the Company to reach record net income levels. Our actual results for fiscal 2007 significantly exceeded our expectations as theCompany established numerous operating records as a result of the services we provided to customers. Fiscal 2007 was also a recordyear for both the Construction Services and the Repair and Maintenance Services segments, primarily as a result of the services we provide to the Aboveground Storage Tank and Downstream Petroleum markets. Consolidated and segment operating records achievedin fiscal 2007 as the result of a clear focus and outstanding performance by the Matrix Service team include consolidated revenues of$639

8 

illi

b

kl

f $356

4 

illi

fi

f $65

9 

illi

i

i

f $33

1 

illi

i

f $19

2 

illi

Michael J. HallChairman of the Board of DirectorsMatrix Service Company

Michael J. BradleyPresident & Chief Executive OfficerMatrix Service Company

FinancialOur fiscal 2exceeded oat May 31, backlog posbusiness. Brevenues to We also geoperating pfiscal 2006effective proapproximat$19.2 milliomillion, or $Total debt d$75 million have positiobefore us. continue to GrowthWe enter fiour hiring abusiness deelements of 

• First, • Seco
E RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMITME

COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPE

EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS 

CATION OUR MESSAGE TO SHAREHOLDERS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE C

ILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT DEDIC

PONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPEND

NSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY INTEGRITY RE

ABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENC

RUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY INTEGRITY RE

EPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMITMENT CREDIBI

REVIEW OF FISCAL 2007On behalf of the Board of Directors and the Company, we are pleased to report that Matrix Service was very successful in exceedingour key objectives for this year and positioning the Company to grow our business.The first objective was to exit the fiscal 2006 turnaround situation, returning the Company to financial stability and position theCompany for long-term growth. We are very pleased to report significant improvements in operating results, financial position andliquidity. Secondly, we knew we needed to make significant investments in our employees. Our commitment to hiring, developing and retaining a skilled workforce was our top initiative coming into fiscal 2007. Attracting and retaining high quality employees isimportant to the continued success of our Company. We have expanded our Professional Development Program for project managers,have added several new craft recruiters in various regions throughout the United States and have expanded our support and operatinginfrastructure throughout the United States. We’ve also commenced our expansion into new areas of Canada. For the year, we successfully increased our workforce from approximately 2,100 employees at May 31, 2006 to 3,100 employees at May 31, 2007,which was critical to our ability to grow and service our customers.Additionally, we knew we needed to make significant investments in assets to allow our employees to capitalize on opportunitiesahead of us.We initially established a capital budget of $9 million, but increased our capital budget during the year as our growthexceeded expectations. Our actual capital expenditures totaled $13 million, primarily for construction and transportation equipment.Finally, we believed the strong market dynamics in the Downstream Petroleum Industry and our financial and operating position wouldallow the Company to reach record net income levels. Our actual results for fiscal 2007 significantly exceeded our expectations as theCompany established numerous operating records as a result of the services we provided to customers. Fiscal 2007 was also a recordyear for both the Construction Services and the Repair and Maintenance Services segments, primarily as a result of the services we provide to the Aboveground Storage Tank and Downstream Petroleum markets. Consolidated and segment operating records achievedin fiscal 2007 as the result of a clear focus and outstanding performance by the Matrix Service team include consolidated revenues of$639.8 million, backlog of $356.4 million, gross profit of $65.9 million, operating income of $33.1 million, net income of $19.2 millionand EPS (diluted) of $0

74

Additionally

Construction Services had records for backlog of $313

8 million

gross profit of $29

5 million

Michael J. HallChairman of the Board of DirectorsMatrix Service Company

Michael J. BradleyPresident & Chief Executive OfficerMatrix Service Company

FinancialOur fiscal 20exceeded ouat May 31, 2backlog posibusiness. Barevenues to We also genoperating pefiscal 2006. effective projapproximate$19.2 millionmillion, or $0Total debt d$75 million chave positionbefore us. Ocontinue to eGrowthWe enter fisour hiring anbusiness develements of 

• First, • Secon• Finall
CONSTRUCTION

SERVICES

AbovegrouCivil & CoStructural MechanicEquipmenElectrical MillwrightFabricatio

Matrix Service offers a wide range of industrial construction services to our clients.We approach everyproject – regardless of size and scope – with the samecommitment to safety, quality and an on-time completion.We take tremendous pride in our ability to exceed ourclients’ expectations.This stems from our commitment toour employees and their dedication to doing the job rightthe first time.Our industrial construction services business segmentprovides turnkey and specialty construction to manyindustries.These services – including civil/structural,mechanical, piping, electrical/instrumentation, millwrighting,and fabrication – are provided for projects of varying

butane and power planliners, and 

Aboveground storage tank construction is one of the cornerstones of our business and continues to be a significant market.We routinely provide turnkey tank andterminal construction services for the bulk storage/terminal,refining, petrochemical, pipeline and power industries. Ourservice offerings in this area include engineering, fabricationand construction.Capital construction for the downstream petroleum industry encompasses a variety of services including turnkeyconstruction of new facilities and expansions of existing facilities, from a single unit to an entire plant.We providethese services to refineries, pipeline facilities, petrochemicalplants and gas facilities. Our personnel routinely execute

SERVIC
CONSTRUCTION

SERVICES

AbovegrouCivil & ConStructural MechanicaEquipmenElectrical & MillwrightiFabrication 

Matrix Service offers a wide range of industrial construction services to our clients.We approach everyproject – regardless of size and scope – with the samecommitment to safety, quality and an on-time completion.We take tremendous pride in our ability to exceed ourclients’ expectations.This stems from our commitment toour employees and their dedication to doing the job rightthe first time.Our industrial construction services business segmentprovides turnkey and specialty construction to manyindustries.These services – including civil/structural,mechanical, piping, electrical/instrumentation, millwrighting,and fabrication – are provided for projects of varyingcomplexities, schedule durations and budgets.

butane and power planliners, and wthermal vac

Aboveground storage tank construction is one of the cornerstones of our business and continues to be a significant market.We routinely provide turnkey tank andterminal construction services for the bulk storage/terminal,refining, petrochemical, pipeline and power industries. Ourservice offerings in this area include engineering, fabricationand construction.Capital construction for the downstream petroleum industry encompasses a variety of services including turnkeyconstruction of new facilities and expansions of existing facilities, from a single unit to an entire plant.We providethese services to refineries, pipeline facilities, petrochemicalplants and gas facilities. Our personnel routinely executelarge, complex and schedule-sensitive projects; however,

SERVIC
Repair and maintenance requirements vary from industry

to industry. At Matrix Service, we provide a wide rangeof routine, preventative, planned, and emergency repairand maintenance services. Our project management andfield supervision are committed career professionals, theirdedication and commitment, has earned us a reputationfor quality, safety and reliability. As a result, we have theproven ability to provide quality services safely for a widerange of industries.The majority of these services includeaboveground storage tank repair and maintenance,turnarounds and maintenance for the downstreampetroleum industry, electrical and instrumentation repair and maintenance as well as specialty repairs.Aboveground storage tank repair, modification, and REPAIR &MAINTENANCE

SERVICES

SERVICqualificatioof various unit to an providing t

bottoms, shells, nozzles, roof structures, seals, and appurtenances for tanks of all sizes. In addition, we provide environmentally friendly solutions for secondarycontainment and leak detection. Matrix Service offers our clients single source responsibility and accountability;managing entire tank repair and maintenance programs.Repair and maintenance services for the downstreampetroleum industry are typically classified as either maintenance or turnarounds. Safety, quality, efficiency,and reliability are critical components to the success ofthese services.Through the years Matrix Service hasbecome a preferred provider for many of our downstreampetroleum clients.We provide exceptional on-site dailymaintenance to refineries, petrochemical and chemical

Refining & Facility & Facility MTank RepaBoiler RepDike & TaASME CoIndustrial EmergencPlanning, S
Repair and maintenance requirements vary from industry

to industry. At Matrix Service, we provide a wide rangeof routine, preventative, planned, and emergency repairand maintenance services. Our project management andfield supervision are committed career professionals, theirdedication and commitment, has earned us a reputationfor quality, safety and reliability. As a result, we have theproven ability to provide quality services safely for a widerange of industries.The majority of these services includeaboveground storage tank repair and maintenance,turnarounds and maintenance for the downstreampetroleum industry, electrical and instrumentation repair and maintenance as well as specialty repairs.Aboveground storage tank repair, modification, and maintenance projects are diverse and often require REPAIR &MAINTENANCE

SERVICES

SERVICqualificationof various dunit to an eproviding thspecialty eq

bottoms, shells, nozzles, roof structures, seals, and appurtenances for tanks of all sizes. In addition, we provide environmentally friendly solutions for secondarycontainment and leak detection. Matrix Service offers our clients single source responsibility and accountability;managing entire tank repair and maintenance programs.Repair and maintenance services for the downstreampetroleum industry are typically classified as either maintenance or turnarounds. Safety, quality, efficiency,and reliability are critical components to the success ofthese services.Through the years Matrix Service hasbecome a preferred provider for many of our downstreampetroleum clients.We provide exceptional on-site dailymaintenance to refineries, petrochemical and chemicalfacilities and power generation plants across the nation.

Refining & Facility & PFacility MaTank RepaBoiler RepaDike & TanASME CodIndustrial CEmergency Planning, S
ESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMITMENT 

IABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENC

STENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSC

TY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE CONSCIENTIOUS R

N RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY SAFETY QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITME

THY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE 

SIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY INTE

RITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EX

NSIBLE MATRIX SERVICE – OUR PEOPLE DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFE

CELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS C

IABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENC

STENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSC

TY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE CONSCIENTIOUS R

N RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMEN

Critical to our success as a company is our people.We believe our talented workforce is one of the thingsthat sets Matrix Service apart from our competitors.The company’s core values drive our approach to all aspects of the business, including our approach toemployees. An unwavering commitment to safety,integrity, community service, stewardship, positive relationships and delivering the best serves as the foundation of our strong company culture and fosters a positive work environment for our employees.Our commitment to safety starts with our leadership

and succesof our talecontinuous future growA testametalented wlong-term numerous organizatioto managefocus on e

a dedicated team of professionals whose sole focus isrecruiting and employing craft and professional positionscompany-wide. Building relationships and partnering withtechnical/trade schools and colleges/universities is oneexample of our proactive approach to recruitment.Additionally, we continue to enhance our internal projectmanager development program. In this program we recruit and hire top engineering and construction management graduates nationwide. Recently, we expandedthis program to include internal employees that are interested in advancing their careers.This program provides broad

comprehensive training in all aspects
ESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMITMENT 

IABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENC

STENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSC

TY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE CONSCIENTIOUS R

N RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY SAFETY QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITME

THY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE 

SIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY INTEG

RITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EX

NSIBLE MATRIX SERVICE – OUR PEOPLE DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFET

CELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS C

IABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENC

STENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSC

TY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE CONSCIENTIOUS R

N RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMEN

Critical to our success as a company is our people.We believe our talented workforce is one of the thingsthat sets Matrix Service apart from our competitors.The company’s core values drive our approach to all aspects of the business, including our approach toemployees. An unwavering commitment to safety,integrity, community service, stewardship, positive relationships and delivering the best serves as the foundation of our strong company culture and fosters a positive work environment for our employees.Our commitment to safety starts with our leadership.Ensuring we have a strong safety culture and consistency

and successof our talencontinuous future growA testamentalented wolong-term enumerous eorganization to managemfocus on emUnderlying 

a dedicated team of professionals whose sole focus isrecruiting and employing craft and professional positionscompany-wide. Building relationships and partnering withtechnical/trade schools and colleges/universities is oneexample of our proactive approach to recruitment.Additionally, we continue to enhance our internal projectmanager development program. In this program we recruit and hire top engineering and construction management graduates nationwide. Recently, we expandedthis program to include internal employees that are interested in advancing their careers.This program provides broad, comprehensive training in all aspectsof the business which prepares participants for future
STWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REP

SPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY 

NTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTEN

ESPONSIBLE OUR LOCATIONS AND REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RES

AL EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENT

TY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE 

DIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE CONSCIENT

CATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMM

STWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REP

SPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY 

NTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTEN

ESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY 

NCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMI

Crude Reformer &Hydrocracker Unit TurnaroundKenai, AK

Geodesic Dome ConstructionLong Beach, Colton, CA

Scrubber Fabrication & ConstructionAnacortes,WA

Digester Engineering, Fabrication & ConstructionMesa, AZ

Turnkey Coke Drum ReplacementCheyenne,WY

Turnkey Grassroots TerCushing, OK
STWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPU

SPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY 

NTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTEN

ESPONSIBLE OUR LOCATIONS AND REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESP

AL EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTI

TY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCE

CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE 

DIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE EXCELLENCE CONSCIENTI

CATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMM

STWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPU

SPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY 

NTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTEN

ESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCELLENCE SAFETY QUALITY 

NCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS COMMI

Crude Reformer &Hydrocracker Unit TurnaroundKenai, AK

Geodesic Dome ConstructionLong Beach, Colton, CA

Scrubber Fabrication & ConstructionAnacortes,WA

Digester Engineering, Fabrication & ConstructionMesa, AZ

Turnkey Coke Drum ReplacementCheyenne,WY

Turnkey Grassroots TermCushing, OK
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY

1. Michael J. Bradley President & Chief Executive Officer2. George L. Austin Vice President & Chief Financial Officer3. Philip C. Chappelle Vice President, Risk Management4. Nancy E. Downs Vice President, Human Resources5. John S. Newmeister Vice President, Marketing & Business Development EXECUTIVE OFFICERS MATRIX SERVICE INC.6. James P. Ryan President7. Bradley J. Rinehart Vice PresidentEXECUTIVE OFFICERS MATRIX SERVICE INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, INC.8. James A. Bogan President9. Vance R. Davis Vice President10. Albert D. Fosbenner Vice PresidentBOARD OF DIRECTORS11. Michael J. Hall Chairman of the Board of Matrix Service Company1. Michael J. Bradley President & Chief Executive Officer of Matrix Service Company12. I. Edgar Hendrix Chairman & CEO of Red River Energy, Inc.13. Paul K. Lackey Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of The NORDAM Group14. Tom E. Maxwell President & Chief Executive Officer of The Flintco Companies, Inc.15. David J.Tippeconnic Chief Executive Officer of Arrow-Magnolia International L.P.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

CO1070TulsaPh: 9Fx: 9WebINDACCDeloTwo 6120 Suite TulsaSTOComCantINVTruc The 22 CST
UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One) 

 [X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

 For the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007 

or 

 [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

 For the transition period from to ________ 

Commission File No. 1-15461 

MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

 Delaware 

 (State or other jurisdiction of 

 incorporation or organization) 

 10701 East Ute Street 

 Tulsa, Oklahoma 

(Address of Principal Executive Offices) 

 73-1352174 

 (I.R.S. Employer 

 Identification No.) 

 74116 

 (Zip Code) 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (918) 838-8822 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 

(Title of class) 

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share 

Preferred Share Purchase Rights 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None 

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered: NASDAQ Global Market (Common Stock) 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No √_ 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No √_ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has 

been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes √_ No __ 

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be 

contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this 

Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [_] 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of 

“accelerated filer” and ”large accelerated filer” in Rule 12 b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

Large Accelerated Filer __ Accelerated Filer √_ Non-accelerated Filer __ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes No √_ 

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the 

common stock was last sold as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter was approximately $313 

million. 

The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of August 13, 2007 was 26,590,751 shares. 

 Documents Incorporated by Reference

Certain sections of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement relating to the registrant’s 2007 annual meeting of stockholders, which 

definitive proxy statement will be filed within 120 days of the end of the registrant’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference into Part III of 

this Form 10-K. 
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I

Page

Item 1. Business..................................................................................................................1 

Item 1A. Risk Factors................................................................................................................11 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments .........................................................................................................19 

Item 2. Properties.......................................................................................................................................20 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.........................................................................................................................20 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders...................................................................20 

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder 

 Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities......................................................................21 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.................................................................................................................22 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition 

and Results of Operations.............................................................................................................23 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.......................................................39 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ...........................................................................41 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting 

 and Financial Disclosure ...............................................................................................................79 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures ..............................................................................................................79 

Item 9B. Other Information ..........................................................................................................................79 

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance ...........................................................79 

Item 11. Executive Compensation...............................................................................................................80 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management 

and Related Stockholder Matters .................................................................................................80 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence...........................80 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services ......................................................................................80 

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ...............................................................................81 
-1-

PART 1 

Item 1. Business

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A 

of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as 

amended. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this Annual Report which 

address activities, events or developments which we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the 

future are forward-looking statements. The word “believes,” “intends,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “projects,” 

“estimates,” “predicts” and similar expressions are also intended to identify forward-looking statements. 

These forward-looking statements include, among others, such things as: 

• amounts and nature of future revenues and margins from our Construction Services and Repair and 

Maintenance Services segments; 

• our ability to generate sufficient cash from operations or to raise cash in order to meet our short and 

long-term capital requirements; 

• our ability to comply with the financial covenants in our credit agreement; 

• the likely impact of new or existing regulations on the demand for our services; and 

• expansion and other development trends of the industries we serve. 

These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses we made in light of our experience and 

our perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other 

factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. However, whether actual results and 

developments will conform with our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and 

uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, including: 

• the risk factors discussed in Item 1A of this Annual Report and listed from time to time in our filings with 

the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

• general economic, market or business conditions; 

• changes in laws or regulations; and 

• other factors, most of which are beyond our control. 

Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report are qualified by these 

cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by 

us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to or 

effects on us or our business or operations. We assume no obligation to update publicly any such forwardlooking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 
-2- 

BACKGROUND 

Matrix Service Company was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 1989. We provide construction 

services and repair and maintenance services primarily to the energy and energy related industries. As a 

full service industrial contractor, we strive to provide all of our clients the highest degree of safety, quality 

and service utilizing our qualified professionals, technical expertise, skilled craftsmen, and overall project 

management. To serve clients efficiently and effectively, Matrix Service operates regional offices throughout 

the United States and Canada. We have separate union and merit subsidiaries; therefore, we can provide 

services to customers on either a union or merit basis. 

We are licensed to operate in all fifty states and Canada. Our headquarters are in Tulsa, Oklahoma, and we 

have regional operating facilities in California, Delaware, Illinois, Michigan, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas 

and Washington in the United States and Ontario and New Brunswick in Canada. Our principal executive 

offices are located at 10701 E. Ute Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74116. Our telephone number is (918) 838-

8822 and our fax number is (918) 838-8810. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to 

“Matrix Service”, “Matrix Service Company”, the “Company” or to “we”, “our”, and “us” are to Matrix Service 

Company and its subsidiaries. 

We have two reportable segments, the Construction Services segment and the Repair and Maintenance 

Services segment. See Note 15. Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

for segment and geographic information. We also offer services to our customers where our two business 

segments work together to provide a combination of services. Customers utilize our services to expand 

operating facilities, improve operating efficiencies, maintain existing facilities and to comply with stringent 

environmental and safety regulations. 

WEBSITE ACCESS TO REPORTS 

Our public internet site is www.matrixservice.com. We make available free of charge through our internet 

site, via a link to Edgar Online, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current 

reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) 

of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we 

electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

In addition, we currently make available on www.matrixservice.com our annual reports to stockholders. You 

will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader software to view these documents, which are in PDF format. If you do 

not have Adobe Acrobat, a link to Adobe Systems Incorporated’s Internet site, from which you can 

download the software, is provided. 

CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 

Our Construction Services segment provides turnkey and specialty construction to many industries. These 

services, including civil/structural, mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation, millwrighting, and 

fabrication are provided for projects of varying complexities, schedule durations, and budgets. Our project 

experience includes renovations, retrofits, modifications and expansions to existing facilities as well as 

grassroots construction of new facilities. We specialize in aboveground storage tanks for the bulk 

storage/terminal industry, capital construction for the downstream petroleum industry, specialty construction, 

and electrical and instrumentation services for various industries. These services range in duration from 

short term to multiple year contracts and originate from both our union and merit shop operations, which are 

strategically located to serve our customers’ needs. 

 

All projects, large or small, are executed by project teams that are committed to providing the best service 

available, while continuously seeking innovative ways to safely and effectively improve quality and 

productivity. Matrix Service has the support structure necessary for these project teams to manage and 

execute projects within strict scheduling and budgetary constraints. Our in-house estimating, scheduling 

and cost control capabilities are designed to ensure timely and cost-effective execution of the work we 

undertake. 
-3- 

Aboveground Storage Tanks 

One of the cornerstones of our business has been, and continues to be, aboveground storage tanks 

(“AST”). We offer complete engineering, fabrication, and construction (“EFC”) services for the bulk storage 

/ terminal industry as well as the refining, petrochemical, pipeline and power industries. We are one of the 

largest AST constructors in North America. Our expertise includes cone roof tanks, dome roof tanks, open 

top floating roof tanks, geodesic domes, and specialty tanks. 

Every AST project is designed in strict accordance to industry standards, codes and regulations. With the 

teams that we have assembled, we have the knowledge and experience to comply with all applicable 

specifications to ensure that all quality requirements are met or exceeded. In response to environmental 

requirements for control of vapor emissions and leak containment, we have developed many unique 

designs and devices such as floating roof seal systems, dike liners, and other products used on storage 

tanks. 

One of the most significant areas of expertise is our turnkey tank and terminal construction service. Our tank 

design and EFC services, coupled with our overall construction capabilities allow our clients to be confident 

that the project will be completed safely with the highest degree of quality and within time and budget 

constraints. As a general contractor, Matrix Service offers a single point of contact, with the capability to 

perform the civil and site preparation, foundations, liners, mechanical, piping, structural, tank design, 

engineering, fabrication and construction. 

The outlook for the terminal, pipeline and bulk storage industries continues to be strong throughout North 

America. Capital expenditures in the tank and terminal market are expected to increase in the next few 

years. There are several factors contributing to the market growth, including the need to develop increased 

storage capacity to accommodate specialty fuels required by governmental regulations, Canadian oil sands 

storage requirements, and increased sour crude feed stocks storage. As of April 2007, Industrial Info 

Resources is tracking more than 230 projects in North America totaling more than $13.7 billion, including 

$11.0 billion in the United States and $2.3 billion in Canada. The expected United States spending is a 31% 

increase from the same period in 2006. Overall, the health and outlook for the storage and terminal sector 

is quite good. As a leader in the industry, we are well positioned to benefit from this strong market. 

Downstream Petroleum 

In addition to AST, our construction experience for the downstream petroleum market includes refineries, 

pipelines, petrochemical plants and gas facilities. This includes turnkey construction projects, renovations, 

upgrades and expansion of large and small projects. We have developed many long-term relationships with 

our customers and, as a result, much of our work is repeat business with these customers. 

The downstream petroleum market continues to be strong. A focal point of this market is the refining 

industry. There are currently 149 refineries in the United States producing 17.4 million barrels a day, which 

is not expected to meet forecasted needs. In recent years, there have been various proposals for the 

construction of new refineries. However, it is not expected that any of these new refineries will be built in the 

near term. Nonetheless, oil companies continue to earn record profits and many of these companies are 

reinvesting profits into existing facilities. This has resulted in an increase in capital projects. Industrial Info 

Resources is tracking 637 projects totaling more than $71.4 billion in expected construction activity from 

July 2007 through the end of 2009. This includes several major refinery expansion projects which are in 

various stages of planning, permitting, engineering and construction throughout the United States. The 

focus of these expansion projects is to increase production and accommodate different grades of crude oil. 

Electrical and Instrumentation 

Matrix Service is an experienced leader in electrical construction of industrial, instrumentation, electrical and 

control systems. Our experience spans a wide range of industries including combined cycle power, refining, 

petrochemical, heavy industrial, nuclear power, and pharmaceutical. In addition to ground-up construction, 

our highly skilled management and technical teams perform expansion projects, critical path turnarounds, 

emergency response and staff augmentation services. We also have expertise in the design and 

construction of industrial fiber optic and copper cabling for voice, data, control and video systems. 
-4- 

As part of our electrical capabilities, Matrix Service has the experience and expertise to install complex 

instrumentation and control systems. This service includes instrument calibration, installation of instruments, 

loop checks, commissioning, and start-up. 

Specialty 

Our specialty construction services encompass liquefied natural gas (“LNG”)/industrial gas projects, power 

projects, specialty tanks and vessels and fabrication. 

LNG/Industrial Gas Projects/LPG 

Matrix Service engineers, fabricates and constructs refrigerated and cryogenic liquefied gas storage tanks 

for the storage of ammonia, butane, carbon dioxide, ethane, methane, argon, nitrogen, oxygen, propane 

and other products. These tanks are utilized by the chemical, petrochemical and gas industries. 

There has been a resurgence in LNG receiving terminal construction after years of dormancy. The strong 

demand for clean burning natural gas, resulting in part from the large build up of gas-fired power plants and 

generally flat to declining domestic production of natural gas, has created an increased demand for LNG. 

This has created a strong demand for the construction of large LNG tanks, LNG receiving terminals and 

peak shaving plants. Matrix Service is involved in the EFC of these LNG tanks. As of May 2007, there were 

five LNG receiving terminals operating in the United States, 17 terminal projects permitted by the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), three of which are expansions and four terminals approved by 

the Coast Guard. There are nine receiving terminals proposed for FERC approval and five proposed for 

Coast Guard approval in the United States. 

Power Projects

The power industry continues to provide opportunities for Matrix Service as the demand for power continues 

to grow. In addition, environmental compliance spending within the power industry is expected to provide 

significant opportunities for the Company. 

Industrial Info Resources is monitoring 584 future environmental compliance projects totaling $48.0 billion at 

coal-fired power plants with scheduled completion dates between 2007 and 2010. Approximately half of this 

spending, or $24.0 billion, will be for sulfur dioxide (“SO2”) reduction projects. Another 26% will be for 

nitrogen oxide (“NOx”) reduction projects. The remaining 24% of the planned spending, or $11.4 billion, will 

be for other environmental compliance projects such as particulate or mercury reduction. 

Environmental compliance spending at coal-fired power plants is scheduled to peak in 2008 at over $14.0 

billion. During 2008, construction is scheduled to begin on 31 selective catalytic reduction units, 24 selective 

non catalytic reduction units, as well as other overfired air and low NOx burner projects. Total spending for 

NOx reduction during 2008 is anticipated to be $2.3 billion. An additional 42 scrubbers are planned for 

construction kick off during 2008, representing $5.0 billion in total investment. Capital spending for 

particulate and mercury controls is expected to remain steady during 2008 at $3.0 billion. Next year, 

construction of 26 baghouses, or air filtering systems, is planned to commence. Many of these projects will 

include activated carbon injection for mercury control. We believe we are well positioned to provide 

fabrication, erection and/or general construction services for these environmental compliance projects. 

Currently, there is a shortage of companies with the expertise and equipment required to fabricate and 

install stack liners. This shortage came about due to the length of time between the last “burst” of coal fire 

power plant activity and the current renewed interest in this technology. This shortage provides an 

opportunity for Matrix Service to utilize our fabrication and construction expertise and to emerge as a major 

supplier in this area. Although this work is new to Matrix Service, the Company believes it has the skill and 

expertise to expand its product and service offerings to take advantage of this market opportunity while 

generating strong returns. The fabrication and erection of these stacks require expertise and experience 

similar to that used by Matrix Service to execute AST work. 
-5- 

Specialty Tanks and Vessels 

Matrix Service’s specialty tank and vessel expertise includes aerobic/anaerobic digesters, clarifiers, egg 

shaped digesters, spheres, petroleum scrubbers/absorbers, flare tips, thermal vacuum chambers and other 

pressure vessels. The tanks and vessels are engineered, fabricated and constructed in adherence with 

American Petroleum Institute (“API”) standards and specifications and the American Society of Mechanical 

Engineers (“ASME”) codes. These tanks and vessels are used throughout the petroleum, chemical, power, 

aerospace and waste water industries. The specialized nature of these tanks and vessels is supplied by a 

small group of contractors possessing the capability to engineer, fabricate and construct these tanks and 

vessels and the processes they incorporate. Recent refinery expansions of a number of refiners throughout 

the United States and the implementation of clean air requirements in the power industry have caused an 

increased demand for these tanks and vessels. 

Fabrication 

Matrix Service has facilities which provide large scale fabrication services to other operating units within the 

Company throughout the United States. These facilities also provide fabrication services directly to 

customers. These facilities are staffed with qualified personnel and utilize state of the art equipment. Our 

fabrication facilities specialize in steel plate, structural steel and vessel fabrication utilizing carbon steels, 

stainless steels and specialty alloy materials. Our largest fabrication facility is centrally located in the United 

States. This 160,000 sq. ft. facility in Oklahoma is located on the most inland port in the United States with 

barge, rail and truck access. This facility has the capacity to fabricate new tanks, new tank components and 

all maintenance, retrofit and repair parts, including fixed roofs, floating roofs, seal assemblies, shell plate 

and tank appurtenances. This facility is qualified to perform services on equipment that require strict 

adherence to ASME codes and regulations including ASME pressure vessels, stacks, scrubber vessels, 

ducting, heat exchangers, flare stacks and igniter tips. 

REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES 

We provide a wide range of routine, preventative and emergency repair and maintenance services. We are 

committed to maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction, whether scheduling routine maintenance or 

planning an emergency response to an unexpected facility or equipment problem. We provide multiple 

services that allow our clients to select needed services from a single source instead of multiple contractors. 

Our primary services include AST repair and maintenance, turnarounds and maintenance for the 

downstream petroleum industry, specialty repair and maintenance services and electrical and 

instrumentation repair and maintenance. We provide these services for entire plants and facilities as well as 

single units or tanks. 

Many of our repair and maintenance services are performed for clients that have selected Matrix Service as 

a preferred provider through long term commitments or alliance agreements. We have built these 

relationships on years of trust, open communication and a mutual desire to complete projects safely, on 

time, and with a high degree of quality. 

Aboveground Storage Tanks 

Our tank repair and maintenance services are a key component of our core business. We are one of the 

largest tank repair and maintenance contractors in the United States with a solid reputation for quality, 

safety and reliability. Our personnel are well versed in API standards and ASME code work in both 

atmospheric and pressure storage vessels. 

AST repair and maintenance services include replacements/repairs to tank bottoms, shells, nozzles, roof 

structures, steel floating roofs, seals and manways for tanks of all sizes. We provide tank cleaning, 

foundation repair/replacement and complete tank relocation utilizing air lifting technology. 

We also provide environmentally friendly solutions for secondary containment and leak detection. Our 

product offerings include dikes and liners, steel internal floating roofs, tank double bottoms, and primary and 

secondary seals. Every product we offer is engineered to provide our customers with the highest quality. 
-6- 

The outlook for repair and maintenance services for AST is similar to the construction outlook. As new 

tanks and terminals are being built and existing facilities continue to age, there are an increasing number of 

tanks that need maintenance and repair. In addition, there is an increased requirement for secondary 

containment and protection of the environment which provides additional opportunities. Furthermore, in the 

aftermath of the 2005 hurricane season, many facilities in East Texas and Louisiana will continue to 

undergo extensive rebuilding and testing, and will require maintenance and repair services. 

Downstream Petroleum 

Repair and maintenance services for the downstream petroleum industry are typically classified as either 

maintenance or turnarounds. 

Plant maintenance contracts are typically multi-year contracts that provide outsourcing of maintenance 

management and the multiple crafts necessary to provide routine and preventive maintenance services for a 

given facility. A typical maintenance contract includes planning and scheduling and active participation in or 

development of reliability programs, including the development of performance metrics. These services 

generally include both safety implementation and quality assurance /quality control management. 

Turnaround contracts are generally of short duration, but require detailed scheduling to assure the 

availability of qualified personnel and specialty equipment that are needed to complete the work in the 

shortest possible timeframe. We are committed to delivering all services on time, within budget and 

schedule constraints, and most importantly, in a safe manner. 

Electrical and Instrumentation 

Electrical and instrumentation repair and maintenance services include routine and preventative 

maintenance, emergency response, and outage support for various industries including nuclear and fossil 

fuel power, petroleum, petrochemical and pharmaceutical.

Specialty 

Specialty repair and maintenance services include tower and vessel repair and installation; fin fan retube 

and repair; boiler retube and repair; valve installation; carbon steel and alloy pipe fabrication and repair and 

ASME code work. 

One of the areas of our specialty services is providing repair, maintenance, and outage services for the 

power industry. Our onsite maintenance services include routine maintenance that includes cleaning fans, 

changing out lube oil coolers and maintaining gas turbines, heat recovery steam generators and other plant 

equipment. We also provide turbine disassembly, inspection and repair assistance. 

The aging of infrastructure and heightened sensitivity to the protection of the environment as well as health 

concerns have created additional opportunities in these specialized repair and maintenance areas. 
-7- 

OTHER BUSINESS MATTERS 

Customers and Marketing 

Matrix Service derives a significant portion of its revenues from performing construction and repair and 

maintenance services for major integrated oil, independent petroleum and marketing companies. In fiscal 

2007, these customer types accounted for 82.2% of consolidated revenues. The loss of significant work 

from any of these classes of customers or an overall decline in the Downstream Petroleum Industry would 

have a material adverse effect on the Company. Matrix Service also performs services for power 

companies, architectural and engineering firms, general contractors, and several petrochemical companies 

and serves approximately 350 customers. The following table provides a listing of any customer that 

accounted for greater than 10% of either our Construction Services or Repair and Maintenance Services 

revenue for the twelve months ended May 31, 2007: 

Construction Services

Repair and 

Maintenance Services Total 

(In thousands, except percentages) 

Plains All American 

Pipeline LP $ 85,700 23.4% $ 4,827 1.8% $ 90,527 14.1% 

BP PLC 5,711 1.6% 53,320 19.5% 59,031 9.2% 

Sunoco, Inc. 19,638 5.4% 34,718 12.7% 54,356 8.5% 

Bechtel Group, Inc. 45,559 12.4% 51 - 45,610 7.1% 

Enbridge Energy LP 45,590 12.5% 890 0.3% 46,480 7.3% 

Chevron Corp 3,773 1.0% 30,149 11.0% 33,922 5.3% 

Total $ 205,971 56.3% $123,955 45.3% $329,926 51.5% 

The loss of any of these major customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company. 

 

Matrix Service markets its services and products primarily through its marketing and business development 

personnel, senior professional staff and its operating management. The marketing personnel concentrate 

on developing new customers and assisting management with existing customers. We enjoy many 

preferred provider relationships with customers who award us work without competitive bidding through 

long-term agreements. In addition, we competitively bid many projects. Repair and Maintenance Services’ 

projects normally have durations of one week to several months depending on work scope, while 

Construction Services’ projects typically range in duration from several weeks to three years. 

Segment Financial Information 

Financial information for our operating segments is provided in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and 

Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in Note 15. Segment Information of the 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary 

Data”. 

Competition 

Matrix Service competes with a large number of regional construction and maintenance companies and a 

number of national construction and maintenance companies in both the Construction Services and Repair 

and Maintenance Services segments. Competitors generally vary with the markets we serve with few 

competitors competing in all of the markets we serve or for all of the services we provide. Contracts are 

generally awarded based on price, customer satisfaction, safety record and programs, quality and schedule 

compliance. We believe that our turnkey capability, expertise, experience and reputation for providing safe 

and timely quality services allows us to compete effectively. 
-8- 

Backlog 

We define backlog as the total dollar amount of revenues that we expect to recognize as a result of 

performing work that has been awarded to us through a signed contract that we consider firm. Revenue 

from the following contract types are considered firm: 

- fixed-price arrangements 

- minimum customer commitments on cost plus arrangements 

- certain time and material contracts in which the estimated contract value is firm or can be estimated with 

a high degree of precision 

Our Construction Services segment typically contracts through arrangements that we consider firm. 

Therefore, most of the revenue recognized is from projects that were included in backlog. Most of our 

Repair and Maintenance Services segment revenue is derived from contracts which are not considered firm. 

Therefore, most of the Repair and Maintenance Services revenue stems from projects that were not 

included in our backlog. 

At May 31, 2007, the Construction Services segment had a backlog of approximately $313.8 million, as 

compared to a backlog of approximately $230.1 million as of May 31, 2006. The backlog at May 31, 2007 

and 2006 for the Repair and Maintenance Services segment was approximately $42.6 million and $18.3 

million, respectively. The increase in backlog resulted primarily from an overall increase in activity 

associated with AST and other Downstream Petroleum projects. Approximately 86% of our backlog at May 

31, 2007 is expected to be completed in fiscal year 2008. 

The following provides a rollforward of our backlog from May 31, 2006 to May 31, 2007: 

 Construction 

Services 

 Repair and 

Maintenance 

Services Total 

 (In thousands) 

Backlog as of May 31, 2006 $ 230,117 $ 18,331 $ 248,448

New backlog awarded 423,536 126,796 550,332

Backlog canceled (11,089) (1,838) (12,927)

Revenue recognized on contracts in backlog (328,727) (100,723) (429,450)

Backlog as of May 31, 2007 $ 313,837 $ 42,566 $ 356,403

The following reconciles revenue recognized on contracts in backlog to total revenue recognized in fiscal 

2007: 

Construction Services

Repair and 

Maintenance Services Total 

(In thousands, except percentages) 

Revenue recognized on 

contracts in backlog $328,727 89.8% $100,723 36.8% $429,450 67.1% 

Revenue recognized on 

contracts not in 

 backlog 37,433 

 

 10.2% 172,963

 

 

 63.2% 210,396 

 

 32.9% 

Total revenue 

recognized $366,160 100.0% $273,686 100.0% $639,846 100.0% 
-9- 

Seasonality 

The operating results of the Repair and Maintenance Services segment may be subject to significant 

quarterly fluctuations, which are affected primarily by the timing of planned maintenance projects at 

customer facilities. As a result, our quarterly operating results can fluctuate materially. The Construction 

Services segment typically has a lower level of operating activity during the winter months and early in the 

new calendar year as many of our customers’ capital budgets have not been finalized. Also, the demand for 

storage fluctuates which can have a material impact on AST demand and revenues for the Construction 

Services segment. 

Raw Material Sources and Availability 

Steel and steel pipe are the primary raw materials used by the Company. Supplies of these materials are 

available throughout the United States from numerous sources. We do not anticipate being unable to obtain 

adequate amounts of these materials in the foreseeable future. However, the price, quantity available and 

timing of availability of these materials could change significantly due to various factors, including producer 

capacity, the level of foreign imports, demand for the materials, tariffs on imported steel and other market 

conditions. 

Insurance 

The Company maintains insurance coverage for various aspects of our operations. However, we retain 

exposure to potential losses through the use of deductibles, coverage limits and self-insured retentions. 

Typically our contracts require us to indemnify our customers for injury, damage or loss arising from the 

performance of our services and provide for warranties for materials and workmanship. The Company 

may also be required to name the customer as an additional insured under certain insurance policies up 

to the limits of insurance available to us, or we may have to purchase special insurance policies or surety 

bonds for specific customers or provide letters of credit issued under our credit facility in lieu of bonds to 

satisfy performance and financial guarantees on some projects. Matrix Service generally requires its 

subcontractors to indemnify the Company and the Company’s customer and name the Company as an 

additional insured for activities arising out of the subcontractors’ presence at the customer’s location. 

Certain subcontractors must also provide additional insurance policies, including surety bonds in favor of 

the Company, to secure the subcontractors work or as required by the subcontract. Matrix Service 

currently maintains a performance and payment bonding line of $90.0 million. 

There can be no assurance that our insurance and the additional insurance coverage provided by our 

subcontractors will fully protect us against a valid claim or loss under the contracts with our customers. 

Employees 

As of May 31, 2007, we had 3,096 employees of which 378 were employed in non-field positions and 2,718 

were employed in field or shop positions. 

We maintain separate merit shop and union operations. In our union business, we operate under collective 

bargaining agreements with various unions representing different groups of our employees. Union 

agreements provide the union employees with benefits including health and welfare, pension, training 

programs and compensation plans. We have not experienced any significant strikes or work stoppages in 

recent years. We maintain distinct health and welfare, retirement and training programs for our merit shop 

employees. 

Attracting and retaining high quality employees is important to the continued success of our Company. We 

have expanded our Professional Development Program for project managers and have added several new 

craft recruiters in various regions throughout the United States. Recruiting and retaining a skilled workforce 

continues to be a top initiative of the Company. 
-10- 

Patents and Proprietary Technology 

Matrix Service has been issued several patents, has patents pending, and continues to pursue new ideas 

and innovations to better serve our customers in all areas of our business. The Matrix Service patents 

under the Flex-A-Span® and Flex-A-Seal® trademarks are utilized to cover seals for floating roof tanks. Our 

patent of our ThermoStor® diffuser system is for a process that receives, stores and dispenses both chilled 

and warm water in and from the same storage tank. The patented RS 1000 Tank Mixer® controls sludge 

build-up in crude oil tanks through resuspension. We also have a patent on our Flex-A-Swivel®

, a swivel 

joint for floating roof drain systems. Finally, Matrix Service holds a patent which covers a flexible fluid 

containment system marketed as the Valve Shield®

. The Valve Shield® captures and contains fluid leaking 

from pipe and valve connections. 

While we believe that continued product development and the protection of our patents are important to our 

business, we do not believe that these patents are essential to our success. 

Regulation 

Health and Safety Regulations

The operations of the Company are subject to the requirements of the United States Occupational Safety 

and Health Act (OSHA), comparable state laws and the Canadian Workers’ Compensation Board and its 

Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission (“Agencies”). Regulations promulgated by these 

Agencies require employers and independent contractors who perform construction services, including 

electrical and repair and maintenance, to implement work practices, medical surveillance systems and 

personnel protection programs in order to protect employees from workplace hazards and exposure to 

hazardous chemicals and materials. In recognition of the potential for accidents within various scopes of 

work, these Agencies have enacted very strict and comprehensive safety regulations. The Company has 

established comprehensive programs for complying with health and safety regulations and protecting the 

safety of its workers and customers. While the Company believes that it operates safely and prudently, 

there can be no assurance that accidents will not occur or that the Company will not incur substantial liability 

in connection with the operation of its business. 

Environmental 

Matrix Service operations, including operations in the fabrication facilities in Oklahoma and California, could 

subject the Company to environmental liability. However, the Company does not believe at this time that 

any material liability exists relating to any of our operating locations. To further mitigate any potential 

liability, the Company has purchased pollution liability insurance with coverage limits of $2.0 million per 

occurrence. 

A defect in the Company’s services or faulty workmanship could result in an environmental liability if, as a 

result of the defect or faulty workmanship, a contaminate was released into the environment. The Company 

currently has liability insurance with pollution coverage of $10.0 million per occurrence to limit any potential 

loss.
-11- 

Item 1A. Risk Factors 

The nature of our business activities and operations subjects us to a number of risks and uncertainties. If 

any of the events described below were to occur, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, 

financial condition and operating results. 

An inability to attract and retain qualified personnel, and in particular, project managers and skilled 

craft workers, could impact our ability to perform on our contracts, which could harm our business 

and impair our future revenues and profitability.

Our ability to attract and retain qualified project managers, engineers, skilled craftsmen and other 

experienced professionals in accordance with our needs is an important factor in our ability to maintain and 

increase profitability. The market for these professionals is competitive, and the supply is limited. We 

cannot provide any assurance that we will be successful in our efforts to retain or attract qualified personnel 

when needed. Therefore, when we anticipate or experience growing demand for our services, we may incur 

additional cost to maintain a professional staff in excess of our current contract needs in an effort to have 

sufficient qualified personnel available to address this anticipated demand. If we do incur additional 

compensation and benefit costs, our customer contracts may not allow us to pass through these costs. 

Competent and experienced project managers and craft workers are especially critical to the profitable 

performance of our contracts, particularly on our fixed-price contracts where superior execution of the 

contract can result in profits greater than originally estimated or where inferior contract execution can reduce 

or eliminate estimated profits or even result in a loss. 

Our project managers are involved in most aspects of contracting and contract performance including: 

• supervising the bidding process, including providing estimates of significant cost components, such as 

material and equipment needs, and the size and composition of the workforce; 

• negotiating contracts; 

• supervising contract performance, including performance by our employees, subcontractors and other 

third party suppliers and vendors; 

• estimating costs for completion of contracts that is used by us to estimate amounts that can be reported 

as revenues and earnings on the contract under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting; 

• negotiating requests for change orders and the final terms of approved change orders; and 

• determining and documenting claims by us for increased costs incurred due to the failure of customers, 

subcontractors and other third-party suppliers of equipment and materials to perform on a timely basis 

and in accordance with contract terms. 

Unsatisfactory safety performance can affect customer relationships, result in higher operating 

costs, negatively impact employee morale and result in high employee turnover. 

Our workers are subject to the normal hazards associated with providing services on construction sites and 

industrial facilities. Even with proper safety precautions, these hazards can lead to personal injury, loss of 

life, damage to, or destruction of, property, plant and equipment, lower employee morale and environmental 

damage. We are intensely focused on maintaining a strong safety environment and reducing the risk of 

accidents to the lowest possible level. Poor safety performance may limit or eliminate potential revenue 

streams from many of our largest customers and may materially increase our future insurance and other 

operating costs. 

Our growth strategy requires that we increase the size of our workforce. While we normally target 

experienced personnel for employment, we also hire inexperienced employees. Even with thorough 

training, inexperienced employees have a higher likelihood of injury which could lead to higher operating 

costs and insurance rates. 
-12- 

We may encounter difficulties during the course of performing our contracts that may result in 

additional costs to us and a reduction in our revenues and earnings that could have an adverse 

effect upon our financial condition and results of operations. 

Many of our construction and repair and maintenance projects are performed over extended periods of time 

and involve complex design and engineering specifications. In these cases, it is common for us to perform 

work from time-to-time over the life of the project that is outside the scope of the original contract with the 

expectation of receiving a signed change order from the customer. Our contracts for these projects often 

require us to provide extensive project management and to obtain machinery, equipment, materials and 

services from third parties or the customer. We may encounter difficulties in obtaining these products and 

services on a timely basis. In some cases, these third-party provided products may not perform as 

expected or the services delivered may not meet contract specifications. These performance failures and 

other factors, some of which are beyond our control, may result in delays and additional costs to us 

including, in some cases, the cost of procuring alternate product or service providers, which may adversely 

impact our ability to complete a project on budget and in accordance with the original delivery schedule. To 

the extent these and the other matters referred to in the next paragraph occur, we may seek to recover any 

increased costs incurred by us from the responsible party; however, we cannot assure you that we will be 

successful in recovering all or a part of these costs in any or all circumstances. 

In certain circumstances, we guarantee project completion or the achievement of certain acceptance and 

performance testing levels by a scheduled date. Failure to meet schedule or performance requirements 

could result in additional costs to us, including lost incentive payments and the payment of contractually 

agreed liquidated damages. The amount of such additional costs could exceed our profit margins on the 

project. While we may seek to recover these amounts as claims from the supplier, vendor, subcontractor or 

other third party responsible for the delay or for providing non-conforming products or services, we cannot 

assure you that we will recover all or any part of these costs in all circumstances. Performance problems for 

existing and future projects could cause our actual results of operations to differ materially from those 

anticipated by us and could damage our reputation within our industry and our customer base. 

Work stoppages and other labor problems could adversely affect us. 

Some of our employees are represented by labor unions. A lengthy strike or other work stoppage on any of 

our projects could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations due to an 

inability to complete contracted projects in a timely manner. From time to time, we have also experienced 

attempts to unionize certain of our merit employees. While these efforts have achieved only limited success 

to date, we cannot provide any assurance that we will not experience additional and more successful union 

activity in the future.

Demand for our products and services is cyclical and is vulnerable to downturns in the industries 

and markets which we serve as well as conditions in the general economy. 

The demand for our products and services depends significantly upon the existence of construction and 

repair and maintenance projects in the downstream petroleum and power and other industries in the United 

States and Canada. The capital budgets of many of our energy industry customers are largely dependent 

on the continuation of high commodity prices. Our markets historically have been, and will likely continue to 

be, cyclical in nature and vulnerable to general downturns in the United States and Canadian economies 

and declines in commodity prices, which could adversely affect the demand for our products and services. 

Occasionally, the timing of the demand for our products and services in certain of these markets can also be 

adversely affected during periods of strong economic growth as customers may postpone closing their 

facilities for maintenance, repair, turnaround or expansion projects while demand for their products remains 

high. 

As a consequence of these and other factors, our results of operations have varied and are likely to 

continue to vary significantly depending on the demand for future projects from these industries. 
-13- 

We face substantial competition in each of our business segments, which may have a material 

adverse effect on our business by reducing our ability to increase or maintain profitability. 

We face competition in all areas of our business from regional, national and international competitors, many 

of which may have greater financial and other resources. Our competitors include well-established, wellfinanced entities, both privately and publicly held, including many major power equipment manufacturers, 

engineering and construction companies and internal engineering departments. The markets that we serve 

require substantial resources and, in particular, highly skilled and experienced technical personnel. We 

compete primarily on the basis of price, customer satisfaction, safety performance and programs, the quality 

of our products and services, and our ability to timely comply with project schedules. We may encounter 

increased competition from existing competitors or new market entrants in the future, which could have a 

material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. 

Our results of operations depend upon the award of new contracts and the timing of those awards. 

Our revenues are derived primarily from contracts awarded on a project-by-project basis. Generally, it is 

very difficult to predict whether and when we will be awarded a new contract since many potential contracts 

involve a lengthy and complex bidding and selection process that may be affected by a number of factors, 

including changes in existing or assumed market conditions, financing arrangements, governmental 

approvals and environmental matters. Because our revenues are derived primarily from these contracts, 

our results of operations and cash flows can fluctuate materially from period to period depending on the 

timing of contract awards. 

The uncertainty associated with the timing of contract awards may increase our cost of doing business over 

a short period or a comparatively longer term. For example, we may decide to maintain and bear the cost of 

a workforce in excess of our current contract needs in anticipation of future contract awards. If an expected 

contract award is delayed or not received, we could incur costs to maintain an idle workforce that may have 

a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Alternatively, we may decide that our long term 

interests are best served by reducing our workforce and incurring increased costs associated with 

severance and termination benefits which also could have a material adverse effect on our results of 

operations for the period when incurred. Reducing our workforce could also impact our results of operations 

if we are unable to adequately staff projects that are awarded subsequent to a workforce reduction. 

The loss of one or more of our significant customers could adversely affect us. 

From time to time due to the size of one or more of our contracts, one or more customers have in the past 

and may in the future contribute a material portion of our consolidated revenues in any one year. Because 

these significant customers generally contract with us for specific projects, we may lose these customers 

from year to year as their projects with us are completed. If we do not replace them with other customers or 

other projects, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. 

Additionally, we have long-standing alliance relationships with many significant customers. However, our 

contracts with these customers are on a project-by-project basis, and these customers may unilaterally 

reduce or discontinue their use of our services at any time. The loss of business from any one of these 

customers could have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations. 
-14- 

There are integration and consolidation risks associated with our growth strategy. Future 

acquisitions may also result in significant transaction expenses, unexpected liabilities and risks 

associated with entering new markets, and we may be unable to profitably operate our business. 

An aspect of our business strategy is to make strategic acquisitions in markets where we currently operate 

as well as in markets in which we have not previously operated. We may have difficulties identifying 

attractive acquisition candidates or we may be unable to acquire desired businesses on economically 

acceptable terms during periods of elevated mergers and acquisition activity or for other reasons. 

Additionally, existing or future competitors may desire to compete with us for acquisition candidates that 

may have the effect of increasing acquisition costs or reducing the number of suitable acquisition 

candidates. We may not have the financial resources necessary to consummate any acquisitions or the 

ability to obtain the necessary funds on satisfactory terms. We may not have sufficient management, 

financial and other resources to integrate future acquisitions. Any future acquisitions may result in significant 

transaction expenses, unexpected liabilities and risks associated with entering new markets in addition to 

the integration and consolidation risks. In the event we are unable to complete future strategic acquisitions, 

we may not grow in accordance with our expectations. 

If we make any future acquisitions, we likely will have exposure to third parties for liabilities of the acquired 

business that may or may not be adequately covered by insurance or by indemnification, if any, from the 

former owners of the acquired business. Any of these unexpected liabilities could have a material adverse 

effect on us. 

Future events, including those associated with our growth strategy, could negatively affect our 

liquidity position. 

We can provide no assurance that we will have sufficient cash from operations or the credit capacity to meet 

all of our future cash needs should we encounter significant working capital requirements or incur significant 

acquisition costs. Insufficient cash from operations and significant working capital requirements have in the 

past and could in the future reduce availability under our credit facility and impact our ability to comply with 

the terms of our credit agreements. 

The terms of our contracts could expose us to unforeseen costs and costs not within our control, 

which may not be recoverable and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial 

condition. 

Under fixed-price contracts, we agree to perform the contract for a fixed-price and, as a result, can improve 

our expected profit by superior contract performance, productivity, worker safety and other factors resulting 

in cost savings. However, we could incur cost overruns above the approved contract price, which may not 

be recoverable. Under certain incentive fixed-price contracts, we may agree to share with a customer a 

portion of any savings we are able to generate while the customer agrees to bear a portion of any increased 

costs we may incur up to a negotiated ceiling. To the extent costs exceed the negotiated ceiling price, we 

may be required to absorb some or all of the cost overruns. 

Fixed-price contract prices are established based largely upon estimates and assumptions relating to project 

scope and specifications, personnel and material needs. These estimates and assumptions may prove 

inaccurate or conditions may change due to factors out of our control, resulting in cost overruns, which we 

may be required to absorb and that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition 

and results of our operations. In addition, our profits from these contracts could decrease and we could 

experience losses if we incur difficulties in performing the contracts or are unable to secure fixed-pricing 

commitments from our manufacturers, suppliers and subcontractors at the time we enter into fixed-price 

contracts with our customers. 

Under cost-plus contracts, we perform our services in return for payment of our agreed upon reimbursable 

costs plus a profit. The profit component is typically expressed in the contract either as a percentage of the 

reimbursable costs we actually incur or is factored into the rates we charge for labor or for the cost of 

equipment and materials, if any, we are required to provide. Some cost-plus contracts provide for the 

customer’s review of the accounting and cost control systems used by us to calculate these labor rates and 

to verify the accuracy of the reimbursable costs invoiced. These reviews could result in reductions in 

amounts previously billed to the customer and in an adjustment to amounts previously reported by us as our 

profit on the contract. 
-15- 

Many of our fixed-price or cost-plus contracts require us to satisfy specified progress milestones or 

performance standards in order to receive a payment. Under these types of arrangements, we may incur 

significant costs for labor, equipment and supplies prior to receipt of payment. If the customer fails or 

refuses to pay us for any reason, there is no assurance we will be able to collect amounts due to us for 

costs previously incurred. In some cases, we may find it necessary to terminate subcontracts with suppliers 

engaged by us to assist in performing a contract and we may incur costs or penalties for canceling our 

commitments to them. 

If we are unable to collect amounts owed to us under our contracts, we may be required to record a charge 

against previously recognized earnings related to the project, and our liquidity, financial condition and results 

of operations could be adversely affected. 

Our use of percentage-of-completion accounting for fixed-price contracts and our reporting of 

profits for cost-plus contracts prior to contract completion could result in a reduction or elimination 

of previously reported profits. 

A material portion of our revenues are recognized using the percentage-of-completion method of 

accounting. The percentage-of-completion accounting practices that we use result in our recognizing fixedprice contract revenues and earnings ratably over the contract term based on the proportion of actual costs 

incurred to our estimated contract costs. The earnings or losses recognized on individual fixed-price 

contracts are based on estimates of contract revenues, costs and profitability. We review our estimates of 

contract revenues, costs and profitability on a monthly basis. Prior to contract completion, we may adjust 

our estimates on one or more occasions as a result of changes in cost estimates, change orders to the 

original contract, collection disputes with the customer on amounts invoiced or claims against the customer 

for increased costs incurred by us due to customer-induced delays and other factors. 

Contract losses are recognized in the fiscal period when the loss is determined. Contract profit estimates 

are also adjusted in the fiscal period in which it is determined that an adjustment is required. No 

restatements are made to prior periods. Further, a number of our contracts contain various cost and 

performance incentives and penalties that impact the earnings we realized from our contracts, and 

adjustments related to these incentives and penalties are recorded in the period when estimable. 

As a result of the requirements of the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, the possibility exists, 

for example, that we could have estimated and reported a profit on a contract over several prior periods and 

later determine, usually near contract completion, that all or a portion of such previously estimated and 

reported profits were overstated. If this occurs, the full aggregate amount of the overstatement will be 

reported for the period in which such determination is made, thereby eliminating all or a portion of any profits 

from other contracts that would have otherwise been reported in such period or even resulting in a loss 

being reported for such period. 

Our financial loss exposure on cost-plus contracts is generally limited to a portion of our profit on the 

contract. However, it is possible that the customer could successfully dispute the costs we believe we 

incurred on the contract or assert that our costs were excessive for reasons such as poor project 

management or labor productivity. In addition, some cost-plus contracts contain penalty provisions for failure 

to achieve certain milestones or performance standards. To the extent we are not able to recover the full 

amount of our costs under a cost-plus contract, including adjustments under contract penalty provisions, 

there would be a reduction, or possibly an elimination, of previously recognized and reported earnings. In 

certain circumstances, it is possible that such adjustments could be material to our operating results. 

We may incur significant costs in providing services in excess of original project scope without 

having an approved change order. 

After commencement of a contract, we may perform, without the benefit of an approved change order from 

the customer, additional services requested by the customer that were not contemplated in our contract 

price due to customer changes or to incomplete or inaccurate engineering, project specifications and other 

similar information provided to us by the customer. Our construction contracts generally require the 

customer to compensate us for additional work or expenses incurred under these circumstances. 
-16- 

A failure to obtain adequate compensation for these matters could require us to record in the current period 

an adjustment to revenue and profit recognized in prior periods under the percentage-of-completion 

accounting method. Any such adjustments, if substantial, could have a material adverse effect on our 

results of operations and financial condition, particularly for the period in which such adjustments are made. 

We cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining, through negotiation, arbitration, litigation or 

otherwise, approved change orders in an amount adequate to compensate us for our additional work or 

expenses. 

We are involved and are likely to continue to be involved in legal proceedings, which will increase 

our costs and, if adversely determined, could have a material effect on our financial condition and 

results of operations. 

We are currently a defendant in legal proceedings arising from the operation of our business and it is 

reasonable to expect that we would be named in future actions. Most of the actions against us arise out of 

the normal course of performing services on project sites, and include claims for workers’ compensation, 

personal injury and property damage. From time to time, we are also named as a defendant in contract 

disputes with customers relating to the timeliness and quality of the performance of our services and 

equipment, materials, design or other services provided by subcontractors and third-party suppliers. We 

also are, and are likely to continue to be, a plaintiff in legal proceedings against customers seeking to 

recover payment of contractual amounts due to us as well as claims for increased costs incurred by us 

resulting from, among other things, services performed by us at the request of a customer that are in excess 

of original project scope that are later disputed by the customer and customer-caused delays in our contract 

performance. 

We maintain insurance against operating hazards in amounts that we believe are customary in our industry. 

However, our insurance has deductibles and exclusions of coverage so we cannot provide assurance that 

we are adequately insured against all the types of risks that are associated with the conduct of our business. 

A successful claim brought against us in excess of, or outside of, our insurance coverage could have a 

material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. 

Litigation, regardless of its outcome, is expensive, typically diverts the efforts of our management away from 

operations for varying periods of time, and can disrupt or otherwise adversely impact our relationships with 

current or potential customers and suppliers. Payment and claim disputes with customers also cause us to 

incur increased interest costs resulting from drawing higher levels of debt under our revolving line of credit 

or receive less interest income resulting from less funds invested due to the failure to receive payment for 

disputed claims and accounts. 

Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions that we use to prepare our financial 

statements. 

To prepare financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, management is 

required to make estimates and assumptions, as of the date of the financial statements, which affect the 

reported values of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosures of contingent assets and 

liabilities. Areas requiring significant estimation by our management include: 

• contract expenses and profits and application of percentage-of-completion accounting; 

• costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts; 

• provisions for uncollectible receivables from customers for invoiced amounts; 

• the amount and collectibility of claims against customers, third-party suppliers, subcontractors and 

others for increased costs incurred by us that were caused by the actions or inactions of these parties, 

such as increased costs due to delays in their performance or to the failure of machinery, equipment 

and supplies provided by them to perform to agreed specifications; 

• provisions for income taxes and related valuation allowances; 

• recoverability of goodwill; 
-17- 

• valuation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with business combinations; and 

• accruals for estimated liabilities, including litigation and insurance reserves. 

Our actual results could differ from these estimates. 

We are susceptible to adverse weather conditions, which may harm our business and financial 

results. 

Our business may be adversely affected by severe weather in areas where we have significant operations. 

Repercussions of severe weather conditions may include: 

• curtailment of services; 

• suspension of operations; 

• inability to meet performance schedules in accordance with contracts; 

• weather related damage to our facilities; 

• inability to receive machinery, equipment and materials at jobsites; and 

• loss of productivity. 

Our projects expose us to potential professional liability, product liability, warranty and other 

claims, which could be expensive, damage our reputation and harm our business. We may not be 

able to obtain or maintain adequate insurance to cover these claims. 

We perform construction and maintenance services at large industrial facilities where accidents or system 

failures can be disastrous. Any catastrophic occurrence in excess of our insurance limits at locations 

engineered or constructed by us or where our products are installed or services performed could result in 

significant professional liability, product liability, warranty and other claims against us by our customers, 

including claims for cost overruns and the failure of the project to meet contractually specified milestones or 

performance standards. Further, the rendering of our services on these projects could expose us to risks, 

and claims by, third parties and governmental agencies for personal injuries, property damage and 

environmental matters, among others. Any claim, regardless of its merit or eventual outcome, could result 

in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and create negative publicity, particularly for claims 

relating to environmental matters where the amount of the claim could be extremely large. Insurance 

coverage is increasingly expensive and we may not be able to or may choose not to obtain or maintain 

adequate protection against the types of claims described above. If we are unable to obtain insurance at an 

acceptable cost or otherwise protect against the claims described above, we will be exposed to significant 

liabilities, which may materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. 

Earnings for future periods may be affected by impairment charges. 

Because we have grown in part through acquisitions, goodwill and other acquired intangible assets 

represent a substantial portion of our assets. We perform an annual goodwill impairment review in the 

fourth quarter of every fiscal year. In addition, we perform a goodwill impairment review whenever events or 

changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. At some future date, we may 

determine that an additional significant impairment has occurred in the value of our unamortized intangible 

assets, goodwill or fixed assets, which could require us to write off an additional portion of our assets and 

could adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations. 
-18- 

Our credit facility imposes restrictions that may limit business alternatives. 

Our senior revolving credit facility contains covenants that restrict or limit our ability to incur additional 

debt, create liens, acquire or dispose of assets, repurchase equity, or make distributions. In addition, our 

credit facility requires that we comply with a number of financial covenants. These covenants and 

restrictions may impact our ability to effectively execute operating and strategic plans. Our ability to 

comply with these covenants may be affected by factors or events beyond our control; therefore, our 

future operating performance may not be sufficient to comply with the required covenants. 

Our failure to comply with one or more of the covenants in our credit facility could result in an event of 

default. We can provide no assurance that a default could be remedied, or that our creditors would grant 

a waiver or amend the terms of the credit facility. If an event of default occurs, our lenders could elect to 

declare all amounts outstanding under the facility to be immediately due and payable, terminate all 

commitments, or refuse to extend further credit. If an event of default occurs and the lenders under the 

credit facility accelerate the maturity of any loans or other debt outstanding, we may not have sufficient 

liquidity to repay amounts outstanding under the existing agreement. 

Our common stock, which is listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, has from time-to-time 

experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations are likely to continue in 

the future, and our stockholders may not be able to resell their shares of common stock at or above 

the purchase price paid. 

The market price of our common stock may change significantly in response to various factors and events 

beyond our control, including the following: 

• the risk factors described in this Item 1A; 

• the significant concentration of ownership of our common stock in the hands of a small number of 

institutional investors; 

• a shortfall in operating revenue or net income from that expected by securities analysts and investors; 

• changes in securities analysts’ estimates of our financial performance or the financial performance of 

our competitors or companies in our industry; 

• general conditions in our customers’ industries; and 

• general conditions in the security markets. 

Some companies that have volatile market prices for their securities have been subject to security class 

action suits filed against them. If a suit were to be filed against us, regardless of the outcome, it could result 

in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources. This could have a 

material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. 

Future sales of our common stock may depress our stock price.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market or otherwise, either by us, 

a member of management or a major stockholder, or the perception that these sales could occur, could 

depress the market price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of 

additional equity securities. 

We may issue additional equity securities, which would lead to dilution of our issued and 

outstanding stock. 

The issuance of additional common stock or securities convertible into our common stock would result in 

dilution of the ownership interest in us held by existing stockholders. We are authorized to issue, without 

stockholder approval 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, in one or more series, 

which may give other stockholders dividend conversion, voting, and liquidation rights, among other rights, 

which may be superior to the rights of holders of our common stock. Our Board of Directors has no present 

intention of issuing any such preferred stock series, but reserves the right to do so in the future. In addition, 
-19- 

we are authorized to issue, without stockholder approval, a significant number of additional shares of our 

common stock and securities convertible into either common stock or preferred stock. 

Environmental factors and changes in laws and regulations could increase our costs and liabilities. 

Our operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations, including those concerning: 

• emissions into the air; 

• discharges into waterways; 

• generation, storage, handling, treatment and disposal of hazardous material and wastes; and 

• health and safety. 

Our projects often involve highly regulated materials, including hazardous wastes. Environmental laws and 

regulations generally impose limitations and standards for regulated materials and require us to obtain 

permits and comply with various other requirements. The improper characterization, handling, or disposal of 

regulated materials or any other failure by us to comply with federal, state and local environmental laws and 

regulations or associated environmental permits could subject us to the assessment of administrative, civil 

and criminal penalties, the imposition of investigatory or remedial obligations, or the issuance of injunctions 

that could restrict or prevent our ability to operate our business and complete contracted projects. 

In addition, under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 

(“CERCLA”), and comparable state laws, we may be required to investigate and remediate regulated 

materials. CERCLA and the comparable state laws typically impose liability without regard to whether a 

company knew of or caused the release, and liability for the entire cost of clean-up can be imposed upon 

any responsible party. 

The environmental, workplace, employment and health and safety laws and regulations, among others, to 

which we are subject are complex, change frequently and could become more stringent in the future. It is 

impossible to predict the effect of any future changes to these laws and regulations on us. We cannot 

assure you that our operations will continue to comply with future laws and regulations or that these laws 

and regulations and/or a failure to comply with these laws will not significantly adversely affect our business, 

financial condition and results of operations. 

Changes in environmental laws and regulations or a reduced level of enforcement of existing laws 

and regulations could adversely affect the demand for our services and our results of operations. 

Changes in environmental laws and regulations that reduce existing standards and a reduced level of 

enforcement of these laws and regulations could adversely affect the demand by our customers for many of 

our services. Proposed changes in regulations and the perception that enforcement of current 

environmental laws has been less strict has decreased the demand for some of our services, as customers 

have anticipated and adjusted to the potential changes. Future changes could result in a decreased 

demand for some of our services. The ultimate impact of any such future changes will depend upon a 

number of factors, including the overall strength of the economy and customer views on whether new or 

more restrictive regulations will be adopted or whether there will be a relaxing of the requirements and levels 

of enforcement of existing regulations and the cost-effectiveness of remedies available under changed 

regulations. If proposed or enacted changes materially reduce demand for our environmental services, our 

results of operations could be adversely affected. 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments 

None 
-20- 

Item 2. Properties

The principal properties of Matrix Service at May 31, 2007 were as follows: 

Location Description of Facility Segment Interest 

 

Tulsa, Oklahoma Corporate Headquarters Corporate Leased 

 

Alton, Illinois Regional office and 

warehouse 

Repair & Maintenance Leased 

 

Bellingham, Washington Regional office and 

warehouse 

Construction and 

Repair & Maintenance 

Owned 

 

Catoosa, Oklahoma Fabrication facility, regional 

office and warehouse 

Construction and 

Repair & Maintenance 

Owned (1) 

 

Eddystone, Pennsylvania Regional office and 

warehouse 

Construction and 

Repair & Maintenance 

Leased (2) 

 

Houston, Texas Regional office and 

warehouse 

Construction and 

Repair & Maintenance 

Owned 

 

Newark, Delaware Regional office and 

warehouse 

Construction and 

Repair & Maintenance 

Leased 

 

Orange, California Fabrication facility and 

regional office 

Construction and 

Repair & Maintenance 

Owned 

 

Sarnia, Canada Regional office and 

warehouse 

Repair & Maintenance Owned 

 

Suisun City, California Regional office and 

warehouse 

Repair & Maintenance Leased 

 

Temperance, Michigan Regional office and 

warehouse 

Construction and 

Repair & Maintenance 

Owned 

(1) Facilities were constructed by the Company in 2002 and 2003 on land acquired through the execution 

of a 15 year ground lease with renewal provisions for five additional terms of five years each. 

(2) In March 2007, we exercised our right of first refusal to purchase the Eddystone, Pennsylvania facility, 

subject to due diligence and review of environmental matters. Due diligence is in process and we have 

up to three years to execute a purchase agreement. 

In addition to the locations listed above, Matrix Service has temporary office facilities at numerous customer 

locations throughout the United States and Canada. 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings 

The information called for by this item is provided in Note 8. Contingencies, included in the Notes to 

Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8., which information is incorporated by 

reference into this item. 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 

None 
-21- 

Part II 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases 

of Equity Securities 

Price Range of Common Stock 

Our common stock trades on the Global Market System (previously named the National Market System) of 

the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Automated Quotation System (“NASDAQ”). The trading 

symbol for our Common Stock is “MTRX”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices for our 

Common Stock as reported by NASDAQ for the periods indicated: 

 Fiscal Year 2007 Fiscal Year 2006 

 High Low High Low 

First quarter $ 13.35 $ 10.63 $ 7.75 $ 3.92 

Second quarter 16.00 11.89 9.97 6.67 

Third quarter 19.60 15.10 11.47 8.73 

Fourth quarter 27.19 16.50 12.19 10.03 

As of August 1, 2007, there were 43 holders of record of our common stock. We believe that the number of 

beneficial owners of our common stock is substantially greater than the number of holders of record. 

Dividend Policy 

We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. We currently intend to retain earnings to 

finance the growth and development of our business. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will 

depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements and earnings as well as other factors the Board of 

Directors may deem relevant. Our credit agreement limits the amount of cash dividends we can pay. 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 

In October 2000, the Board of Directors authorized a stock buyback program, which permitted the purchase 

of up to 20% (i.e., 3,447,506 shares) of our common stock outstanding at that time. To date, Matrix Service 

has purchased 2,116,800 shares under the program and has authorization to purchase an additional 

1,330,706 shares. Although the Company did not repurchase any common shares in fiscal 2007, Matrix 

Service intends to repurchase shares in future periods if accretive to earnings. The Company has 

1,297,466 treasury shares remaining as of May 31, 2007 and intends to utilize these treasury shares solely 

for the satisfaction of stock issuances under the 1990, 1991 and 2004 stock plans and the 1995 

Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan. 

 

Total Number 

of Shares 

Purchased

Average Price 

Paid 

Per Share

Total Number 

of Shares 

Purchased as 

Part of 

Publicly 

Announced 

Plans or 

Programs

Maximum 

Number of 

Shares That 

May Yet Be 

Purchased 

Under the 

Plans 

or Programs

March 1 to March 31, 2007 - $ - 2,116,800 1,330,706 

April 1 to April 30, 2007 - - 2,116,800 1,330,706 

May 1 to May 31, 2007 - - 2,116,800 1,330,706 

Total - $ - 2,116,800 1,330,706 
-22- 

Item 6. Selected Financial Data 

The following table sets forth selected historical financial information for Matrix Service covering the five 

fiscal years ended May 31, 2007: 

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 2004 (3) 2003(2) (3) 

(In thousands, except percentages and per share data) 

Revenues $ 639,846 $ 493,927 $ 439,138 $ 607,904 $ 288,418 

Gross profit 65,886 47,079 31,019 46,313 31,610 

Gross profit % 10.3% 9.5% 7.1% 7.6% 11.0% 

Operating income (loss) (1) 33,050 17,698 (39,138) 17,519 12,444 

Operating income (loss) % 5.2% 3.6% (8.9)% 2.9% 4.3% 

Income (loss) before income taxes 31,114 11,594 (44,458) 15,213 12,246 

Net income (loss) 19,171 7,653 (38,830) 9,542 8,178 

Net income (loss ) % 3.0% 1.5% (8.8)% 1.6% 2.8% 

Earnings (loss) per share-diluted 0.74 0.35 (2.24) 0.54 0.49 

Equity per share-outstanding 4.72 3.67 2.76 4.98 4.35 

Weighted average shares 

outstanding diluted 

 

 26,752 25,742 17,327 17,615 16,710 

Working capital 51,306 42,656 21,726 63,914 18,287 

Total assets 242,909 188,276 202,380 216,274 202,939 

Long-term debt (including longterm portions of acquisition 

 payable and capital lease 

 obligations) 836 

 

 28,116 

 

 

 

 34,400 

 

 

 

 69,823 

 

 

 

 45,902 

Total debt (including acquisition 

 payable and capital lease 

 obligations) 4,301 30,330 79,086 76,551 51,648 

Capital expenditures 13,120 5,614 1,430 4,675 16,120 

Stockholders’ equity 125,576 76,399 47,985 85,715 70,181 

Total long-term debt to equity % 0.7% 36.8% 71.7% 81.5% 65.4% 

Cash flow provided (used) by 

operations 11,358 35,880 4,516 (28,099) 17,542 

(1) See Notes 1 and 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements regarding restructuring, impairment and abandonment 

costs included in operating income (loss). 

(2) The operating results of an acquisition that occurred on March 7, 2003 are included in the Selected Financial Data effective March 

7, 2003. 

(3) During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company declared a two-for-one stock split payable, on November 21, 2003, in the 

form of a one-for-one stock dividend to shareholders of record on October 31, 2003. All shares, share prices and earnings per 

share amounts have been restated for all periods presented to reflect the change in the capital structure. 
-23- 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our 

consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles 

generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). GAAP represents a comprehensive set of accounting and 

disclosure rules and requirements, the application of which requires management judgments and estimates 

including, in certain circumstances, choices between acceptable GAAP alternatives. The preparation of 

these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that 

affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if any, 

at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the 

reporting period. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are 

believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from these estimates under 

different assumptions or conditions. Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in 

this Annual Report on Form 10-K, contains a comprehensive summary of our significant accounting policies. 

The following is a discussion of our most critical accounting policies, estimates, judgments and uncertainties 

that are inherent in our application of GAAP. 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES 

Revenue Recognition 

Matrix Service records profits on fixed-price contracts on a percentage-of-completion basis, primarily based 

on costs incurred to date compared to the total estimated contract cost. Matrix Service records revenue on 

reimbursable and time and material contracts based on a proportional performance basis as costs are 

incurred. Contracts in process are valued at cost plus accrued profits less billings on uncompleted 

contracts. Contracts are generally considered substantially complete when field construction is completed. 

The elapsed time from award of a contract to completion of performance may be in excess of one year. 

Matrix Service includes pass-through revenue and costs on cost-plus contracts, which are customerreimbursable materials, equipment and subcontractor costs, when Matrix Service determines that it is 

responsible for the procurement and management of such cost components on behalf of the customer. 

Matrix Service has numerous contracts that are in various stages of completion which require estimates to 

determine the appropriate cost and revenue recognition. Matrix Service has a history of making reasonably 

dependable estimates of the extent of progress towards completion, contract revenues and contract costs, 

and accordingly, does not believe significant fluctuations are likely to materialize. However, current 

estimates may be revised as additional information becomes available. If estimates of costs to complete 

fixed-price contracts indicate a loss, a provision is made through a contract write-down for the total loss 

anticipated. A number of our contracts contain various cost and performance incentives and penalties that 

impact the earnings we realize from our contracts. Adjustments related to these incentives and penalties 

are recorded in the period on a percentage of completion basis when estimable and probable. 

Indirect costs (such as salaries and benefits, supplies and tools, equipment costs and insurance costs) are 

charged to projects based upon direct labor hours and overhead allocation rates per direct labor hour. 

Warranty costs are normally incurred prior to project completion and are charged to project costs as they 

are incurred. Warranty costs incurred subsequent to project completion were not material for the periods 

presented. Overhead allocation rates are established annually during the budgeting process and evaluated 

for accuracy throughout the year based upon actual direct labor hours and actual costs incurred. 
-24- 

Claims Recognition 

Claims are amounts in excess of the agreed contract price (or amounts not included in the original contract 

price) that we seek to collect from customers or others for delays, errors in specifications and designs, 

contract terminations, change orders in dispute or unapproved as to both scope and price or other causes of 

anticipated additional costs incurred by us. Recognition of amounts as additional contract revenue related 

to claims is appropriate only if it is probable that the claims will result in additional contract revenue and if the 

amount can be reliably estimated. We must determine if: 

• there is a legal basis for the claim; 

• the additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen by the Company and are not 

the result of deficiencies in our performance; 

• the costs are identifiable or determinable and are reasonable in view of the work performed; and 

• the evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. 

If all of these requirements are met, revenue from a claim is recorded only to the extent that we have 

incurred costs relating to the claim. 

As of May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2006, accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of 

billings on uncompleted contracts included revenues, to the extent of costs incurred, for unapproved change 

orders of $5.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and claims of $1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively. 

Historically, our collections for unapproved change orders and other claims have approximated the amount 

of revenue recognized. 

The following table provides a rollforward of revenue recognized on claims and unapproved change orders. 

Amounts disclosed for unapproved change orders exclude amounts associated with contract disputes 

disclosed in Note 8. Contingencies. 

 Claims for 

Unapproved Change 

Orders Other Claims 

 

Total 

 (In thousands) 

Balance at May 31, 2005 $ 208 $ 383 $ 591 

Additions 4,138 337 4,475 

Collections (455) (141) (596) 

Loss (46) (56) (102) 

Balance at May 31, 2006 3,845 523 4,368 

Additions 5,639 1,493 7,132 

Collections (3,921) (492) (4,413) 

Loss (434) (31) (465) 

Balance at May 31, 2007 $ 5,129 $ 1,493 $ 6,622 

Loss Contingencies 

Various legal actions, claims, and other contingencies arise in the normal course of our business. 

Contingencies are recorded in the consolidated financial statements, or are otherwise disclosed, in 

accordance with SFAS No. 5 “Accounting for Contingencies”. Specific reserves are provided for loss 

contingencies to the extent we conclude their occurrence is both probable and estimable. We use a case 

by case evaluation of the underlying data and update our evaluation as further information becomes known. 

We believe that any amounts exceeding our recorded accruals should not materially affect our financial 

position, results of operations or liquidity. However, the results of litigation are inherently unpredictable and 

the possibility exists that the ultimate resolution of one or more of these matters could result in a material 

adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. 

Legal costs are expensed as incurred. 
-25- 

Insurance Reserves 

We maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our operations. However, we retain exposure to 

potential losses through the use of deductibles, coverage limits and self-insured retentions. As of May 31, 

2007 and May 31, 2006, insurance reserves totaling $6.4 million are reflected on our balance sheet. These 

amounts represent our best estimate of our ultimate obligations for asserted claims, insurance premium 

true-up settlement estimates, and claims incurred but not yet reported at the balance sheet date. We 

establish specific reserves for claims using a case by case evaluation of the underlying claim data and 

update our evaluations as further information becomes known. Judgments and assumptions are inherent in 

our reserve accruals; as a result, changes in assumptions or claims experience could result in changes to 

these estimates in the future. Additionally, the actual results of claim settlements could differ from the 

amounts estimated.

Goodwill 

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized and are tested at least annually 

for impairment. We perform our annual analysis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and in any 

other period in which indicators of impairment warrant an additional analysis. Goodwill represents the 

excess of the purchase price of acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is 

evaluated for impairment by first comparing management’s estimate of the fair value of a reporting unit with 

its carrying value, including goodwill. Reporting units for purposes of goodwill impairment calculations are 

our reportable segments. 

Management utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the estimated fair value of our 

reporting units. Significant judgments and assumptions including the discount rate, anticipated revenue 

growth and gross margins, estimated operating and interest expense, and capital expenditures are 

inherent in these fair value estimates which are based on our internal operating budgets. As a result, 

actual results may differ from the estimates utilized in our discounted cash flow analysis. The use of 

alternate judgments and/or assumptions could result in a fair value that differs from our estimate and 

could result in the recognition of an impairment charge in the financial statements. 

As a result of these uncertainties, we utilize multiple scenarios and assign probabilities to each of the 

scenarios in the discounted cash flow analysis. The results of the discounted cash flow analysis are then 

compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair 

value, a computation of the implied fair value of goodwill is compared with its related carrying value. If the 

carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment 

loss is recognized in the amount of the excess. If an impairment charge is incurred, it would negatively 

impact our results of operations and financial position. 

At the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005, we conducted an impairment analysis due to the existence of 

several indicators of impairment. The impairment indicators stemmed primarily from a decline in operating 

results and the continuation of several large contract disputes, which: 

• increased our overhead costs; 

• reduced our cash flow from operations; 

• caused us to maintain higher than anticipated borrowings under our credit facility; 

• inhibited our ability to refinance our credit facility; 

• increased the likelihood that we would be unable to achieve long-term revenue and cash flow 

targets; 

• reduced our borrowing capacity available to fund new working capital requirements and inhibited 

our ability to bid on new projects; and 

• caused us to initiate restructuring plans, which included the sale of revenue generating assets. 
-26- 

The fair value of the Construction Services segment at February 28, 2005 was estimated to be $32.0 million 

compared to a carrying value of $57.0 million, indicating an impairment to the recorded value of goodwill. 

We ultimately recorded an impairment charge of $25.0 million for our Construction Services segment in the 

third quarter of fiscal 2005. No impairment was indicated for our Repair and Maintenance Services 

segment. 

As a result of improved operating results over the past several quarters, the resolution of most of our large, 

disputed contracts and the expansion and extension of our credit facility in November 2006 and July 2007, 

we do not currently anticipate another goodwill impairment for either our Construction Services or Repair 

and Maintenance Services segments. However, certain events may occur that might adversely affect the 

reported value of goodwill. Such events could include, but are not limited to, strategic decisions made in 

response to economic or competitive conditions, a significant change in the project plans of our customers, 

the economic condition of the customers and industries we serve, and a material negative change in the 

relationships with one or more of our significant customers. If our judgments and assumptions change as a 

result of the occurrence of any of these events or other events that we do not currently anticipate, our 

expectations as to future results and our estimate of the implied value of one or more of our reporting units 

also may change. Thus, for example, assuming that all other components of our fair value estimate remain 

unchanged, a change in the following assumptions would have the following effect on our fair value 

estimate: 

• if the growth rate of estimated revenue decreases 100 basis points from current estimates, fair 

value for the Construction Services segment would be reduced by approximately $14.0 million and 

fair value for the Repair and Maintenance Services segment would be reduced by approximately 

$6.0 million; 

• if assumed gross margins decrease one percent, fair value for the Construction Services segment 

would be reduced by approximately $33.1 million and fair value for the Repair and Maintenance 

Services segment would be reduced by approximately $16.4 million; and 

• if the applicable discount rate increases 100 basis points, fair value for the Construction Services 

segment would be decreased by approximately $13.1 million and fair value for the Repair and 

Maintenance Services segment would be reduced by approximately $6.1 million. 

 

Our significant assumptions, including revenue growth, gross margins, operating and interest expense and 

other factors, have been reasonably accurate in recent years, but are likely to change in light of the 

dynamic competitive environment in which we operate. However, given the excess of estimated fair 

value over carrying value of $120.6 million for the Construction Services segment and $35.0 million for 

the Repair and Maintenance Services segment at May 31, 2007, we do not believe that the illustrative 

adverse change in each of the assumptions discussed above would cause us to record an impairment 

charge. 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards 

Accounting standards that have recently been issued that may have a material effect on our Consolidated 

Financial Statements include the following. 

FIN 48 – Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes 

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 

48), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, 

Accounting for Income Taxes.” FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the 

minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial 

statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and 

penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The interpretation applies to all tax 

positions related to income taxes subject to FASB Statement No. 109. 
-27- 

FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Differences between the amounts 

recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts 

reported after adoption should be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the 

beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company will adopt FIN 48 effective June 1, 2007 and is 

currently in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financial 

position, consolidated results of operations and cash flows. 

SFAS No. 157 – Fair Value Measurements 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). This 

Statement establishes a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a 

definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and expands 

disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after 

November 15, 2007 and is generally applied prospectively. We are currently assessing the impact of 

SFAS No. 157 on our Consolidated Financial Statements. 

SFAS No. 159 – The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an 

Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), 

“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB 

Statement No. 115”. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and 

certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has 

been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for 

fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a 

material effect on our financial statements. 
-28- 

Matrix Service Company 

Annual Results of Operations 

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

 

Construction 

Services 

 Repair & 

Maintenance 

Services 

 

(1) 

Other 

 

Consolidated 

Total 

Fiscal Year 2007 

 

Consolidated revenues $ 366,160 $ 273,686 $ - $ 639,846 

Gross profit 29,494 36,392 - 65,886 

Operating income (loss) 11,567 21,556 (73) 33,050 

Income (loss) before income tax expense 10,394 20,793 (73) 31,114 

Net income (loss) 6,498 12,718 (45) 19,171 

Earnings per share - diluted 0.74 

Weighted average shares - diluted 26,752 

 

Fiscal Year 2006 

 

Consolidated revenues $ 243,725 $ 250,202 $ - $ 493,927 

Gross profit 20,392 26,687 - 47,079 

Operating income (loss) 6,561 11,237 (100) 17,698 

Income (loss) before income tax expense 2,536 9,158 (100) 11,594 

Net income (loss) 2,168 5,547 (62) 7,653 

Earnings per share - diluted 0.35 

Weighted average shares - diluted 25,742 

 

Fiscal Year 2005 

 

Consolidated revenues $ 203,950 $ 235,188 $ - $ 439,138 

Gross profit 12,178 18,841 - 31,019 

Operating income (loss) (40,786) 2,005 (357) (39,138) 

Income (loss) before income tax expense (44,052) (49) (357) (44,458) 

Net income (loss) (38,590) (19) (221) (38,830) 

Earnings per share - diluted (2.24) 

Weighted average shares - diluted 17,327 

 

Variances 2007 to 2006 

 

Consolidated revenues $ 122,435 $ 23,484 $ - $ 145,919 

Gross profit 9,102 9,705 - 18,807 

Operating income 5,006 10,319 27 15,352 

Income before income tax expense 7,858 11,635 27 19,520 

Net income 4,330 7,171 17 11,518 

 

Variances 2006 to 2005 

 

Consolidated revenues $ 39,775 $ 15,014 $ - $ 54,789 

Gross profit 8,214 7,846 - 16,060 

Operating income 47,347 9,232 257 56,836 

Income before income tax expense 46,588 9,207 257 56,052 

Net income 40,758 5,566 159 46,483 

(1) Includes items associated with exited operations. 
-29- 

Results of Operations 

Overview 

The Company has two reportable segments, Construction Services and Repair and Maintenance 

Services. The majority of the work for both segments is performed in the United States with less than 

2.5% of revenues generated in Canada during fiscal 2007. However, the Company does continue to seek 

opportunities for growth in both the domestic and international markets. 

The Construction Services segment provides turnkey and specialty construction to many industries. These 

services including civil/structural, mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation, millwrighting, and 

fabrication are provided for projects of varying complexities, schedule durations, and budgets. Our project 

experience includes renovations, retrofits, modifications and expansions to existing facilities as well as 

grassroots construction of new facilities. We specialize in aboveground storage tanks for the bulk 

storage/terminal market, capital construction for the downstream petroleum market, specialty construction, 

and electrical and instrumentation services. 

The Repair and Maintenance Services segment provides a wide range of routine, preventative and 

emergency repair and maintenance services, outage and turnaround services, including plant 

maintenance, electrical and instrumentation maintenance, tank inspection, repair and maintenance, 

industrial cleaning and ASME code repairs. Our primary services include aboveground storage tank repair 

and maintenance, turnarounds and maintenance for the downstream petroleum market, specialty repair and 

maintenance services and electrical and instrumentation repair and maintenance. 

Significant fluctuations in revenues, backlog, gross profits and operating results are discussed below on a 

consolidated basis and for each segment. Revenues fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to many 

factors, including the changing product mix and project schedules, which are dependent on the level and 

timing of customer releases of new business. 

Fiscal Year 2007 versus 2006 

Consolidated 

Consolidated revenues were $639.8 in fiscal 2007, an increase of $145.9 million, or 29.5%, from 

consolidated revenues of $493.9 million in fiscal 2006. This large improvement in consolidated revenues 

resulted from an increase of $122.4 million in Construction Services revenues combined with growth of 

$23.5 million in Repair and Maintenance Services revenues. Matrix Service’s backlog has grown since 

early fiscal 2006 and continued to increase throughout fiscal 2007 despite the large increase in 

consolidated revenues. Backlog of $356.4 million at the end of fiscal 2007 represents a 43.5% 

improvement when compared to backlog of $248.4 million at the end of fiscal 2006. The Construction 

Services segment accounts for 88% of Matrix Service’s backlog at May 31, 2007.

Consolidated gross profit increased from $47.1 million in fiscal 2006 to $65.9 million in fiscal 2007. This 

improvement of $18.8 million, or 39.9%, was due to the 29.5% growth in revenues combined with greater 

margins contributed by the Repair and Maintenance Services segment. Consolidated gross margins 

grew from 9.5% in fiscal 2006 to 10.3% in fiscal 2007 due to an improvement in the Repair and 

Maintenance Services segment, which grew to 13.3% in the current fiscal year versus 10.7% in the prior 

fiscal year. This improvement stemmed from effective project execution, more efficient absorption of fixed 

costs due to the larger revenue base and a continued focus by the Company on managing its contractual 

risks, while at the same time working with our customers to meet their strategic objectives. In addition, 

margins were further enhanced by a favorable market and an expanding backlog which allowed Matrix 

Service to be more selective in its process of procuring projects. Partially offsetting these improvements 

was a pre-tax charge in fiscal 2007 of $11.3 million, or $0.25 per fully diluted share, resulting from 

continued cost escalations on a liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) construction project in the Gulf Coast 

region. 

 
-30- 

Consolidated SG&A expenses were $32.8 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $28.8 million for fiscal 2006. 

The increase of $4.0 million was primarily due to employee-related expenses resulting from additional 

staff hired throughout fiscal 2007 to support our growth combined with additional expense of $1.5 million 

related to the fair value recognition provisions in SFAS-123(R), ”Share-Based Payment”. Partially 

offsetting this increase was a decline in legal costs of approximately $1.5 million as the Company has 

settled all but one of its significant contract disputes. SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue fell to 

5.1% in fiscal 2007 compared to 5.8% in the prior fiscal year as the 29.5% growth in revenues more than 

offset the increase in SG&A expenses. 

Restructuring charges in fiscal 2007 of $0.1 million relate primarily to additional environmental accruals 

on a discontinued business and additional workers compensation costs. Restructuring charges in fiscal 

2006 of $0.5 million related primarily to professional fees, restructuring incentives and costs to shut down 

a fabrication facility. Since the restructuring was essentially complete at May 31, 2007, we expect any 

future costs related to the program to be minimal. 

Interest expense declined to $2.4 million in fiscal 2007 compared to $7.8 million in fiscal 2006. This sharp 

decline of $5.4 million was primarily due to reduced debt outstanding during the year. Current year 

interest expense was primarily related to the amortization of prepaid interest and fees on the convertible 

notes, amortization of deal fees on the senior credit facility, and interest on short-term borrowings under 

the revolving facility. 

Other income in fiscal 2006 of $1.6 million resulted from gains on the sale of assets identified during the 

restructuring effort. Other income in fiscal 2007 of $0.3 million consisted of miscellaneous non-operating 

items. 

Income before income tax expense increased to $31.1 million in fiscal 2007 from $11.6 million in fiscal 

2006. This $19.5 million improvement was due to higher gross profit combined with decreased interest 

expense. Partially offsetting this improvement was higher SG&A expense in fiscal 2007 along with gains 

on the sale of assets included in fiscal 2006 results. 

The effective tax rates for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 were 38.4% and 34.0%, respectively. Both fiscal 

2007 and fiscal 2006 benefited from the tax recognition of losses on disputed contracts. In fiscal 2007, 

certain operating loss carryforwards previously reserved were utilized or deemed to be fully utilizable 

resulting in a benefit of $0.8 million. In fiscal 2006, approximately $1.4 million of previously established 

valuation allowances were reversed upon the utilization of the related operating loss carryforwards. 

Net income for fiscal 2007 rose to $19.2 million, or $0.74 per fully diluted share, versus net income in 

fiscal 2006 of $7.7 million, or $0.35 per fully diluted share.

Construction Services 

Revenues for the Construction Services segment rose significantly from $243.7 million in fiscal 2006 to 

$366.2 million in fiscal 2007, which represents an increase of $122.5 million, or 50.3%. This improvement 

was primarily due to Aboveground Storage Tank revenues increasing $70.9 million, but improvements 

were also seen throughout the segment as Downstream Petroleum revenues rose $25.1 million, Specialty 

revenues grew $16.6 million and Electrical and Instrumentation revenues climbed $9.9 million. The 

substantial growth in the Aboveground Storage Tank revenues was driven by the strength of the market 

and capital spending from our core customer base. The growth in Downstream Petroleum revenues was 

primarily due to the performance of work for two additional refinery customers, while the growth in 

Specialty revenues was primarily related to the LNG construction project. 

Backlog increased from $230.1 million at May 31, 2006 to $313.8 million at May 31, 2007. The increase 

of $83.7 million, or 36.4%, was primarily due to significant awards for the construction of Aboveground 

Storage Tank capacity at new terminals and terminal expansions. 
-31- 

Gross profit rose from $20.4 million in fiscal 2006 to $29.5 million in fiscal 2007, an improvement of 

44.6%. Construction Services gross margins declined from 8.4% in fiscal 2006 to 8.1% in fiscal 2007. 

This decrease occurred due to a pre-tax charge in fiscal 2007 of $11.3 million on an LNG construction 

project in the Gulf Coast region. The charge was a result of a difficult post-Katrina labor environment, 

unforeseen productivity challenges and complexity of design leading to material and equipment cost 

increases. In addition, weather continued to affect this lump sum project resulting in a more compressed 

schedule. The loss recognized this year reflects our best forecast of costs required to achieve our 

customer’s schedule on the remaining 42.5% of the work. 

Operating income and income before income tax expense increased to $11.6 million and $10.4 million, 

respectively, in fiscal 2007 from operating income and income before income tax expense of $6.6 million 

and $2.5 million in fiscal 2006, respectively. This significant improvement was the result of additional 

revenues, combined with lower interest expense. 

Repair and Maintenance Services 

Revenues from the Repair and Maintenance Services segment grew $23.5 million, or 9.4%, from $250.2 

million in fiscal 2006 to $273.7 million in fiscal 2007. This improvement resulted primarily from increases 

in Aboveground Storage Tank revenues of $28.1 million and Electrical and Instrumentation revenues of 

$14.2 million. Partially offsetting this growth was a reduction in Downstream Petroleum revenues of 

$18.8 million as turnaround work that occurred in fiscal 2006 was not fully replaced in fiscal 2007. 

Repair and Maintenance Services backlog increased from $18.3 million at May 31, 2006 to $42.6 million 

at May 31, 2007, an increase of $24.3 million or 132.8%. The increase was driven by leveraging our AST 

construction customers, resulting in new and additional AST repair and maintenance projects. 

Gross margins improved to 13.3% in fiscal 2007 as compared to gross margins of 10.7% in fiscal 2006 

primarily as the result of more effective project execution and higher revenue volumes relative to the 

segment’s overall fixed cost structure. Gross profit also improved from $26.7 million in fiscal 2006 to 

$36.4 million in fiscal 2007. 

Operating income and income before income tax expense climbed to $21.6 million and $20.8 million, 

respectively, in fiscal 2007 compared to $11.2 million and $9.2 million produced in fiscal 2006. This 

improvement was primarily due to higher revenues and margins combined with reduced interest expense. 

Fiscal Year 2006 versus 2005 

Consolidated 

Consolidated revenues were $493.9 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of $54.8 million, or 12.5%, from 

consolidated revenues of $439.1 million in fiscal 2005. The improvement in consolidated revenues 

resulted from a $39.8 million increase in Construction Services revenues combined with an increase of 

$15.0 million in Repair and Maintenance Services revenues. 

Consolidated gross profit increased from $31.0 million in fiscal 2005 to $47.1 million in fiscal 2006. The 

improvement of $16.1 million, or 51.8%, in gross profit was due to a 12.5% increase in revenues 

combined with improved margins. Consolidated gross margins increased from 7.1% in fiscal 2005 to 

9.5% in fiscal 2006 due to fiscal 2005 including a significant amount of low margin work that has since 

been replaced with higher margin work from both the Construction Services and Repair and Maintenance 

Services segments. In addition, the larger consolidated revenue base allowed for further absorption of 

fixed costs while restructuring efforts in late fiscal 2005 led to a lower fixed cost structure, which 

management believed was adequate to support the volume of work. 
-32- 

Consolidated SG&A expenses were $28.8 million in fiscal 2006 compared to $40.3 million for fiscal 2005. 

The decline of $11.5 million was primarily due to an additional $10.3 million contract dispute reserve 

recorded in fiscal 2005 as a result of the Company’s effort to accelerate the collection of amounts owed to 

improve the liquidity situation at that time. The Company aggressively pursued collections on its contract 

dispute receivables; therefore, legal costs continued to be significant at $1.9 million in fiscal 2006 as 

compared to $2.2 million in fiscal 2005. The remaining reduction in SG&A costs was related to 

restructuring efforts in late fiscal 2005 that led to a smaller fixed cost structure in fiscal 2006. SG&A 

expense as a percentage of revenue decreased to 5.8% in fiscal 2006 compared to 9.2% in the prior 

fiscal year primarily as a result of the 12.5% increase in revenues combined with the inclusion of the 

contract dispute reserve in fiscal 2005. 

Impairment and abandonment charges of $26.2 million in fiscal 2005 included a $25.0 million impairment 

of goodwill in the Construction Services segment. Our policy is to perform a goodwill impairment review 

when impairment indicators exist and no less than once per year. An additional review was performed in 

the third quarter of fiscal 2005 due to impairment indicators related to liquidity issues and operating 

results. The remaining charge of $1.2 million related to a fixed asset impairment taken in the fourth 

quarter of fiscal 2005. 

Restructuring charges in fiscal 2006 of $0.5 million related primarily to professional fees and costs 

incurred to shut down a fabrication facility that was not required for future operations. The $3.7 million 

charge in fiscal 2005 was primarily due to the restructuring program that began in the fourth quarter of 

fiscal 2005 in response to liquidity issues and the Company’s poor operating results. The focus of this 

program was to reduce the cost structure and improve operating results and liquidity. 

Interest expense increased to $7.8 million in fiscal 2006 as compared to $5.7 million in fiscal 2005. This 

increase was due to higher amortization of debt issuance costs of $1.8 million and interest of $1.7 million 

on the convertible notes issued in April 2005, partially offset by lower cash interest costs of $1.4 million 

due to reductions in our debt outstanding and lower interest rates. 

Other income in fiscal 2006 increased to $1.6 million from $0.4 million in fiscal 2005, both of which 

resulted from gains on the sale of assets identified during the restructuring effort. 

Income before income tax expense increased to $11.6 million in fiscal 2006 from a loss before income tax 

expense of $44.5 million in fiscal 2005. This $56.1 million improvement was due to higher gross profit and 

higher gains on the sales of assets in fiscal 2006 combined with the inclusion in fiscal 2005 of a $10.3 

million contract dispute reserve, impairments of $26.2 million and restructuring charges of $3.7 million, 

partially offset by higher interest expense in fiscal 2006. 

The effective tax rates for fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2005 were 34.0% and 12.7%, respectively. The unusually 

low effective tax rate for fiscal 2005 was attributable to the absence of a tax benefit for the impairment of 

goodwill combined with establishing a valuation allowance for certain deferred tax assets of 

approximately $2.5 million. In fiscal 2006, approximately $1.4 million of previously established valuation 

allowances were reversed. 
-33- 

The following table provides a summary of certain charges, expenses and gains impacting earnings 

during both periods: 

 Fiscal Year 

 2006 2005 

 (In thousands) 

SG&A 

 Legal – disputed contracts $ 1,851 $ 2,240 

 Contract dispute reserve - 10,333 

 $ 1,851 $ 12,573 

Impairment and Abandonment 

 Goodwill impairment $ - $ 25,000 

 Fixed asset impairment 70 1,168 

 $ 70 $ 26,168 

 

Provision for Income Tax 

 Deferred tax asset valuation allowance $ (1,401) $ 2,520 

Other 

 Interest - amortization of debt issuance cost $ 2,660 $ 904 

 Gain on sale of excess assets (1,554) (382) 

 $ 1,106 $ 522 

Construction Services 

Construction Services revenues in fiscal 2006 were $243.7 million, compared to $204.0 million in the prior 

fiscal year, an increase of $39.7 million, or 19.5%. This improvement resulted primarily from Downstream 

Petroleum revenues which increased $32.8 million combined with additional Specialty revenues of $31.0 

million. Aboveground Storage Tank revenues improved $10.2 million. These improvements were 

partially offset by declining revenue from Electrical and Instrumentation, which fell $34.3 million. 

Gross profit increased from $12.2 million in fiscal 2005 to $20.4 million in fiscal 2006, an increase of 

67.4%. The increase was driven by improved margins and increased revenues. Construction Services 

gross margins improved from 6.0% in fiscal 2005 to 8.4% during fiscal 2006 as restructuring efforts in late 

fiscal 2005 led to a reduction in our fixed cost structure. 

Operating income and income before income tax expense increased to $6.6 million and $2.5 million, 

respectively, in fiscal 2006 from an operating loss and loss before income tax expense of $40.8 million 

and $44.1 million in fiscal 2005, respectively. This significant improvement was related to improved 

margins in fiscal 2006 and the inclusion in fiscal 2005 of a $10.3 million contract dispute reserve and a 

$25.0 million goodwill impairment. Partially offsetting these improvements was higher interest expense 

incurred in fiscal 2006. 

Repair and Maintenance Services 

Revenues from Repair and Maintenance Services increased $15.0 million, or 6.4%, from $235.2 million in 

fiscal 2005 to $250.2 million in fiscal 2006. This improvement resulted primarily from increased revenues 

from Aboveground Storage Tanks, which improved $15.4 million. 

Gross margins of 10.7% for fiscal 2006 were higher than gross margins of 8.0% in fiscal 2005 due to the 

inclusion of higher margin turnaround projects in fiscal 2006. Gross profit improved from $18.8 million in 

fiscal 2005 to $26.7 million in fiscal 2006 due to an increase in revenues and better margins. 
-34- 

Operating income for fiscal 2006 of $11.2 million was higher than operating income of $2.0 million 

produced in fiscal 2005 and income before income tax expense for fiscal 2006 of $9.2 million was higher 

than the $0.1 million loss before income tax expense in fiscal 2005. This improvement was primarily due 

to the benefit of additional revenues combined with higher margin work partially offset by higher interest 

expense. 

Non-GAAP Financial Measure 

EBITDA is a supplemental, non-generally accepted accounting principle (GAAP) financial measure. 

EBITDA is defined as earnings before net interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We have 

presented EBITDA because it is used by the financial community as a method of measuring our 

performance and of evaluating the market value of companies considered to be in similar businesses. We 

believe that the line item on our consolidated statements of operations entitled “net income (loss)” is the 

most directly comparable GAAP measure to EBITDA. Since EBITDA is not a measure of performance 

calculated in accordance with GAAP, it should not be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, net 

earnings as an indicator of operating performance. EBITDA, as we calculate it, may not be comparable to 

similarly titled measures employed by other companies. In addition, this measure is not necessarily a 

measure of our ability to fund our cash needs. As EBITDA excludes certain financial information compared 

with net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, users of this financial 

information should consider the type of events and transactions, which are excluded. Our non-GAAP 

performance measure, EBITDA, has certain material limitations as follows: 

• It does not include interest income or expense. Because we have borrowed money to finance our 

operations, interest expense is a necessary and ongoing part of our costs and has assisted us in 

generating revenue. Therefore, any measure that excludes interest expense has material limitations. 

• It does not include taxes. Because the payment of taxes is a necessary and ongoing part of our 

operations, any measure that excludes taxes has material limitations. 

• It does not include depreciation and amortization expense. Because we use capital assets to generate 

revenue, depreciation and amortization expense is a necessary element of our cost structure. 

Therefore, any measure that excludes depreciation and amortization expense has material limitations. 

A reconciliation of EBITDA to net income (loss) follows: 

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 

 (In thousands) 

Net income (loss) $ 19,171 $ 7,653 $ (38,830) 

Interest expense, net 2,264 7,677 5,720 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes 11,943 3,941 (5,628) 

Depreciation and amortization 6,500 5,698 6,726 

EBITDA $ 39,878 $ 24,969 $ (32,012) 

The $14.9 million increase in EBITDA for the year ended May 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year was 

the result of profitable growth experienced in fiscal 2007, partially offset by a charge on an LNG 

construction contract of $11.3 million. 

The $57.0 million increase in EBITDA for the year ended May 31, 2006, as compared to the prior year, 

was in part due to improved operations that occurred as a result of the Company’s restructuring and 

turnaround efforts, which resulted in higher revenues and margins in fiscal 2006. In addition, impairment 

charges of $26.2 million, a $10.3 million contract dispute reserve and restructuring charges of $3.7 million 

were recorded in fiscal 2005. 
-35- 

Outlook 

Our dedication to achieving further improvement in our safety performance and our commitment to hiring, 

developing and retaining a skilled workforce will be two of our top initiatives for the upcoming year. By 

focusing on customer service and project execution, the robust growth and expansion opportunities in our 

core markets will have Matrix Service poised to reach record net income levels in fiscal 2008. The 

Company expects that revenues for the fiscal year ending May 31, 2008, will be between $700 million 

and $750 million. Gross margins for Repair and Maintenance Services are expected to be between 11% 

and 14%, and gross margins for Construction Services are expected to be between 11% and 12%. With 

revenues weighted at 65% for Construction Services and 35% for Repair and Maintenance Services, we 

anticipate consolidated gross margins to be between 11.5% and 12.5%. SG&A is expected to be 

between 5.0% and 5.5% of revenues. 

No convertible notes remain outstanding at May 31, 2007 and the seller financed debt will be retired in 

March 2008; therefore, we expect a continued reduction in interest expense for fiscal 2008. However, 

borrowings to fund the stock buyback program or other strategic investments could result in an offsetting 

increase in interest. As of May 31, 2007, Matrix Service had a net cash position in excess of $9.0 million. 

The effective tax rate should be 40% and Matrix Service should average approximately 27.5 million fully 

diluted shares outstanding throughout the year. 
-36- 

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY 

Overview 

We define liquidity as the ongoing ability to pay our liabilities as they become due, fund business 

operations and meet all monetary contractual obligations. Our primary sources of liquidity in fiscal 2007 

were cash flows from operations and borrowings under our senior revolving credit facility. Cash on hand 

at May 31, 2007 totaled $9.1 million and availability under the senior revolving credit facility totaled $66.4 

million resulting in total liquidity of $75.5 million. Factors that routinely impact our short-term liquidity 

include, but are not limited to: 

• Changes in working capital 

• Contract terms that determine the timing of billings to customers and the collection of those 

billings 

o Some cost plus and fixed price customer contracts are billed based on milestones which 

may require us to incur significant expenditures prior to collections from our customers. 

o Time and material contracts are normally billed in arrears. Therefore, we are routinely 

required to carry these costs until they can be billed and collected. 

o Some of our large construction projects require retentions. 

• Significant capital expenditures 

In the future, we may elect to increase the revolving credit facility or raise additional capital by issuing 

common stock, convertible notes or term debt as necessary to fund our operations. In fiscal 2008, we 

expect cash flows from operations to be a significant source of liquidity, which we expect will fund 

additional investments in capital assets. However, we will continue to evaluate our working capital 

requirements and other factors to maintain sufficient liquidity. 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities 

Operations generated $11.4 million in cash in fiscal 2007. The cash generated from operations was due 

primarily to improved profitability partially offset by an unfavorable increase in operating assets and 

liabilities of $16.0 million. The increase in working capital was primarily due to increased receivables of 

$23.0 million. The increase in receivables was due to higher revenues, the timing of certain billings and 

higher retention amounts. An increase in cost in excess of billings of $21.1 million negatively impacted 

cash, while an increase to billings in excess of costs of $22.2 million positively impacted cash. The costs 

in excess of billings and billings in excess of cost increases were expected given the increase in fiscal 

2007 revenues. An increase in accounts payable positively impacted cash $5.6 million and an increase in 

accrued liabilities positively impacted cash by $4.3 million. The accounts payable increase was due to 

the timing of invoice receipts at year end while the accrued liability increase is due mainly to the timing of 

payrolls at year end which has increased accrued wages. 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities 

Investing activities used $12.8 million in cash in fiscal 2007. This was due to capital expenditures of 

$13.1 million partially offset by proceeds from asset sales of $0.3 million. Fiscal 2007 capital 

expenditures included $9.2 million for the purchase of construction equipment, $2.4 million for 

transportation equipment, $1.0 million for furniture and fixtures, and $0.5 million for land and buildings. 

We also routinely acquire assets utilizing capital leases. Assets acquired through capital leases totaled 

$1.3 million in fiscal 2007 and are reported as non-cash additions to Property, Plant and Equipment. 

The Board of Directors has approved a capital spending budget of $31.1 million for fiscal 2008. Capital to 

replace, repair or maintain equipment represents $13.4 million, or 43% of the total capital budget. We 

also expect to invest $12.6 million, or 41% of the total budget in new assets to increase fabrication 

capacity and to equip additional construction and maintenance crews in targeted growth markets. The 

remaining $5.1 million, or 16% of the total budget is to purchase, expand or improve facilities to address 

the Company’s need for additional office and shop space. 
-37- 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities 

Financing activities generated $2.0 million in cash in fiscal 2007. Exercises of stock options generated 

$2.6 million in cash as our policy is to issue shares from treasury and retain the cash received from the 

exercise. As required by SFAS No. 123 (R), “Share-Based Payment”, the tax benefit we received from 

option exercises is reported as a financing cash flow and totaled $2.1 million in fiscal 2007. The cash 

generated by the stock option exercises was partially offset by the scheduled payment on the acquisition 

note payable of $1.9 million, capital lease payments of $0.7 million and payment of fees relating to the 

November 2006 refinancing of the senior credit facility. 

Senior Revolving Credit Facility 

The senior revolving credit facility is primarily used to fund short-term changes in working capital and 

issuance of letters of credit. The total capacity of the facility at May 31, 2007 was $75.0 million with $8.6 

million outstanding for letters of credit that have been issued to support certain workers’ compensation 

insurance programs and to secure the final payment under the acquisition note payable. The facility 

provides an option to increase total capacity to $100.0 million, with the approval of the administrative 

agent and the Company is currently in the process of seeking such approval. We believe the senior 

credit facility provides adequate liquidity and financial flexibility to support our expected growth in fiscal 

2008. 

The facility contains customary negative covenants including limits on other indebtedness, operating and 

capital lease obligations, asset sales, dividends and certain other distributions. The facility also contains 

financial covenants that require us to maintain certain financial ratios, which could reduce availability 

under the facility in future periods. We are currently in compliance with all covenants and have full 

availability under the facility. 

Convertible Notes 

Convertible notes, with a principal balance of $30.0 million, were issued through a private placement 

transaction on April 25, 2005. An initial interest prepayment of $4.2 million was made in conjunction with 

the issuance for the period up to and including April 25, 2007. Subsequent to April 25, 2007, any 

convertible notes which remained outstanding would have borne interest at 5% or 7% per annum as 

determined by our leverage ratio. Interest was payable in arrears on each calendar quarter end 

beginning on June 30, 2007. The convertible notes and related securities purchase agreement required 

us to maintain certain financial ratios and placed limits on certain types of transactions including, but not 

limited to, caps on borrowing under the senior credit facility, limits on capital lease obligations, limits on 

operating leases and limits on debt under our performance and bonding lines. 

The notes were convertible into shares of our Common Stock at a conversion price of $4.69 per share. 

As of May 31, 2006, $5.0 million of the convertible notes had been converted into 1,002,275 shares of our 

Common Stock. In fiscal 2007, the remaining $25.0 million of notes were converted into 5,292,974 

shares of our Common Stock. 

Acquisition Payable 

As part of an acquisition in fiscal 2003, we deferred a portion of the purchase price to be paid in annual 

installments over five years. The final payment of $2.8 million is due on March 7, 2008. 

Dividend Policy 

We have never paid cash dividends on our Common Stock. We currently intend to retain earnings to 

finance the growth and development of our business. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will 

depend upon our financial condition, capital requirements and earnings as well as other factors the Board of 

Directors may deem relevant. Our credit agreement limits the amount of cash dividends we can pay. 
-38- 

Treasury Shares 

In October 2000, the Board of Directors authorized a stock buyback program, which permitted the purchase 

of up to 20% (i.e., 3,447,506 shares) of our common stock outstanding at that time. To date, Matrix Service 

has purchased 2,116,800 shares under the program and has authorization to purchase an additional 

1,330,706 shares. Although the Company did not repurchase any common shares in fiscal 2007, Matrix 

Service intends to repurchase shares in future periods if accretive to earnings. The Company has 

1,297,466 treasury shares remaining as of May 31, 2007 and intends to utilize these treasury shares solely 

for the satisfaction of stock issuances under the 1990, 1991 and 2004 stock plans and the 1995 

Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan. 

Commitments 

As of May 31, 2007, the following commitments were in place to support our ordinary course obligations: 

Commitments by Expiration Period 

Less than 1 

Year 

 

1-3 Years 3-5 Years 

More than 5 

Years 

 

Total 

(In thousands) 

Letters of credit (1) (2) $ 3,000 $ - $ - $ 5,575 $ 8,575 

Surety bonds (2) 24,879 - - - 24,879 

Total commitments $ 27,879 $ - $ - $ 5,575 $ 33,454 

(1) A $3.0 million letter of credit which supports the acquisition payable is expected to be terminated with the final acquisition 

payable payment in March of 2008. All other letters of credit are reflected in the same period our credit facility expires as the 

letters of credit are normally issued with a one-year term and automatically renew annually. 

(2) Includes $5.6 million of letters of credit and $0.9 million of surety bonds issued in support of our insurance programs. 

Contractual obligations at May 31, 2007 are summarized below: 

Contractual Obligations by Expiration Period 

 Less than 1 

Year 

 

1-3 Years 3-5 Years 

More than 5 

Years 

 

Total 

(In thousands) 

Operating leases $ 971 $ 1,628 $ 1,099 $ 891 $ 4,589 

Capital lease obligations 789 902 44 - 1,735 

Acquisition payable (1) 2,820 - - - 2,820 

Total contractual 

obligations $ 4,580 

 

$ 2,530 

 

 $ 1,143 

 

 $ 891 

 

$ 9,144 

(1) The acquisition payable is recorded at its present value of $2.7 million in the financial statements. Accretion is recorded based 

on a 5.1% interest rate. 
-39- 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk 

Our interest rate risk results primarily from our variable rate indebtedness under our senior credit facility, 

which is influenced by movements in short-term rates. Borrowings under our $75.0 million revolving 

credit facility are based on an alternate base rate or one, two, three or six month LIBOR as elected by the 

Company. Although there were no amounts outstanding under the facility at May 31, 2007, we do 

routinely borrow against our revolving credit line to fund short-term working capital needs. We do not 

currently utilize interest rate swaps to hedge our interest rate risk; therefore, short-term interest rates 

could have an impact on future interest expense. 

Financial instruments with interest rate risk at May 31, 2007 were as follows: 

Maturity by Fiscal Year 

2008 

 

2009 2010 2011 2012 

 

Total 

Fair Value 

as of 

May 31, 

2007 

 (in thousands) 

Long-term debt: 

 Variable rate debt (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 

 Acquisition payable (2) 2,820 - - - - 2,820 2,653 

(1) There were no outstanding borrowings under our senior credit facility at May 31, 2007. In fiscal 2007, the weighted average 

interest rate on our borrowings under our senior credit facility was 8.9%. At the Company’s option, amounts borrowed under 

the revolving credit facility will bear interest at LIBOR or an alternate base rate, plus in each case, an additional margin based 

on the Senior Leverage Ratio. The alternate base rate is the greater of the prime rate or the fed funds effective rate plus 0.5%. 

The additional margin ranges from 0% to 0.75% on alternate base rate borrowings and from 1.50% to 2.25% on LIBOR-based 

borrowings. The Senior Leverage Ratio for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 places the Company in the lowest interest rate 

tier, resulting in LIBOR and alternative base rate margins of 1.50% and 0%, respectively. 

Effective July 6, 2007, the Company amended the senior credit facility. The amendment reduced the additional margin on 

alternate base rate borrowings to a range of 0% to 0.25% and reduced the additional margins on the LIBOR based borrowings 

to 1.00% to 1.75%. 

(2) Payments included in the table represent the amount the Company is obligated to pay in the respective periods. The 

Acquisition Payable is recorded at its present value of $2.7 million in the financial statements. Accretion is recorded based on 

an interest rate of approximately 5.1%. 

Financial instruments with interest rate risk at May 31, 2006 are as follows: 

Maturity by Fiscal Year 

2007 

 

2008 2009 2010 2011 

 

Total 

Fair Value 

as of 

May 31, 

2006 

 (In thousands) 

Long-term debt: 

 Variable rate debt (1) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 

 Acquisition payable (2) 1,880 2,820 - - - 4,700 4,175 

 Convertible notes (3) - - - 25,000 - 25,000 63,113 

(1) There were no outstanding borrowings under our senior credit facility at May 31, 2006. In fiscal 2006, the weighted average

interest rate on our borrowings under our senior credit facility was 10.5%. At the Company’s option, amounts borrowed under 

the revolving credit facility will bear interest at LIBOR or an alternate base rate, plus in each case an additional margin based 

on the Senior Leverage Ratio. The alternate base rate is the greater of the prime rate or the fed funds effective rate plus 0.5%. 

The additional margin ranges from 0.75% to 2.00% on alternate base rate borrowings and from 2.25% to 3.50% on LIBORbased borrowings. The Senior Leverage Ratio for the quarter ended May 31, 2006 places the Company in the lowest interest 

rate tier, resulting in LIBOR and alternative base rate margins of 2.25% and 0.75%, respectively. 

(2) Payments included in the table represent the amount the Company is obligated to pay in the respective periods. The 

Acquisition Payable is recorded at its present value of $4.4 million in the financial statements. Accretion is recorded based on 

an interest rate of approximately 5.1%. 

(3) The notes were issued under a Securities Purchase Agreement among the Company and certain investors and bore interest at 

a fixed rate of 7% per year. An initial interest pre-payment of $4.2 million was made on April 25, 2005 for the period to and 

including April 25, 2007. Interest was payable in arrears on each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 

beginning on June 30, 2007, through the date of maturity. 

 
-40- 

Foreign Currency Risk 

Matrix Service has subsidiaries with operations in Canada with Canadian dollar as their functional 

currency. Historically, movements in the foreign currency exchange rate have not significantly impacted 

results. However, growth in our Canadian operations and fluctuations in the Canadian dollar could impact 

the Company’s financial results in the future. Management has not entered into derivative instruments to 

hedge foreign currency risk, but periodically evaluates the materiality of our foreign currency exposure. A 

10% change in the Canadian dollar against the U. S. dollar would not have had a material impact on the 

financial results of the Company for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007. 

Commodity Risk 

Steel and steel pipe are the primary raw materials used by the Company. Supplies of these materials are 

available throughout the United States. We do not anticipate being unable to obtain adequate amounts of 

these materials in the foreseeable future. However, the price, quantity available and timing of availability 

of these materials could change significantly due to various factors, including producer capacity, the level 

of foreign imports, demand for the materials, the imposition or removal of tariffs on imported steel and 

other market conditions. We mitigate these risks by including standard language in our contracts, which 

passes the risk of increases in steel prices or unavailability of steel to our customers. 
-41- 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 

Financial Statements of the Company 

 Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting................................ 42 

 Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms..............................................43 

 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2007 and 2006.......................................... 47 

 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended 

 May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005............................................................................... 49 

 

 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity 

 for the years ended May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.....................................................50 

 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended 

 May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005............................................................................... 51 

 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements...............................................................53 

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) .........................................................................................77 

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts....................................................................78 

Financial Statement Schedules 

The financial statement schedule is filed as a part of this report under Schedule II – Valuation and 

Qualifying Accounts for the three fiscal years ended May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 immediately 

following Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited). All other schedules are omitted because they are not 

applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements, or notes thereto, included 

herein. 
-42- 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING 

The Management of Matrix Service Company (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are 

responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The 

Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable 

assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for 

external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over 

financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in 

reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the 

Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit 

preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and 

that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of 

management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention 

or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could 

have a material effect on the financial statements. 

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even 

those systems determined to be effective may not prevent or detect misstatements. 

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial 

reporting as of May 31, 2007. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria 

set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in 

Internal Control-Integrated Framework. 

Management’s assessment included an evaluation of such elements as the design and operating 

effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, overall 

control environment and information systems control environment. Based on this assessment, the 

Company’s management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of 

May 31, 2007 was effective. 

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting 

as of May 31, 2007 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public 

accounting firm (“Deloitte & Touche”). Deloitte & Touche’s report on internal control over financial 

reporting is included herein. 
-43- 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

Matrix Service Company:

 

We have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on 

Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Matrix Service Company (the “Company”) maintained 

effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2007, based on criteria established in 

Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 

Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal 

control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial 

reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment and an opinion on 

the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable 

assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material 

respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, 

evaluating management's assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of 

internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the 

circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. 

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision 

of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar 

functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide 

reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial 

statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A 

company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain 

to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and 

dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are 

recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally 

accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only 

in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide 

reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or 

disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of 

collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may 

not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of 

the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may 

become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies 

or procedures may deteriorate. 

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over 

financial reporting as of May 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria 

established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 

Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material 

respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2007, based on the criteria 

established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring 

Organizations of the Treadway Commission. 
-44- 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and 

for the year ended May 31, 2007 of the Company and our report dated August 14, 2007 expressed an 

unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule. 

Tulsa, Oklahoma 

August 14, 2007
-45- 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of 

Matrix Service Company:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Matrix Service Company (the 

“Company”) as of May 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, 

changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended May 31, 

2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 for each of 

the two years in the period ended May 31, 2007. These financial statements and financial statement 

schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an 

opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. The 

consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Company as of May 31, 2005 

and for the year ended May 31, 2005 were audited by other auditors whose report dated August 15, 2005 

expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable 

assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes 

examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. 

An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by 

management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our 

audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial 

position of Matrix Service Company as of May 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of its operations and its 

cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended May 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting 

principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial 

statement schedule for each of the two years in the period ended May 31, 2007, when considered in 

relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material 

respects, the information set forth therein. 

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of 

May 31, 2007, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the 

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 14, 

2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management's assessment of the effectiveness of the 

Company's internal control over financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the 

Company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Tulsa, Oklahoma 

August 14, 2007 
-46- 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Matrix Service Company 

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and 

cash flows of Matrix Service Company for the year ended May 31, 2005. Our audits also included the 

financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15 for the year ended May 31, 2005. These 

financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to 

express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. 

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable 

assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes 

examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. 

An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by 

management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit 

provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. 

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the 

consolidated results of Matrix Service Company’s operations and its cash flows for the year ended May 

31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the 

related financial statement schedule for the year ended May 31, 2005, when considered in relation to the 

basic financial statements as a whole, presents fairly in all material aspects the information set forth 

therein. 

Tulsa, Oklahoma 

August 15, 2005 
-47- 

 Matrix Service Company 

Consolidated Balance Sheets 

(In thousands) 

As of May 31, 

2007 2006 

 

Assets 

Current assets: 

 Cash and cash equivalents $ 9,147 $ 8,585 

 Accounts receivable, less allowances 

 (2007 - $260; 2006 - $190) 

 

97,522 

 

64,061 

 Contract dispute receivables, net 975 11,668 

 Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings 

 on uncompleted contracts 

 

45,634 

 

 24,538 

 Inventories 4,891 4,738 

 Income tax receivable - 104 

 Deferred income taxes 3,283 2,831 

 Prepaid expenses 2,910 5,581 

 Assets held for sale 929 809 

Total current assets 165,291 122,915 

Property, plant and equipment, at cost: 

 Land and buildings 23,405 23,100 

 Construction equipment 39,958 31,081 

 Transportation equipment 14,380 10,921 

 Furniture and fixtures 10,116 8,658 

 Construction in progress 1,788 2,392 

 89,647 76,152 

 Accumulated depreciation (43,654) (38,712) 

 45,993 37,440 

Goodwill 23,357 23,442 

Other assets 8,268 4,479 

Total assets $ 242,909 $ 188,276 

See accompanying notes. 
-48- 

Matrix Service Company 

Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued) 

(In thousands, except share data) 

 As of May 31, 

2007 2006 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity 

Current liabilities: 

 Accounts payable $ 52,144 $ 47,123 

 Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and 

 estimated earnings 

 

34,243 

 

12,078 

 Accrued insurance 6,422 6,408 

 Accrued wages and benefits 15,442 10,470 

 Income tax payable 956 - 

 Current capital lease obligation 753 406 

 Current portion of acquisition payable 2,712 1,808 

 Other accrued expenses 1,313 1,966 

Total current liabilities 113,985 80,259 

 

Convertible notes - 25,000 

Acquisition payable - 2,578 

Long-term capital lease obligation 836 538 

Deferred income taxes 2,512 3,502 

Stockholders’ equity: 

 Common stock - $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 

 27,888,217 and 22,595,243 shares issued as of May 31, 2007 

 and 2006 279 226 

 Additional paid-in capital 104,408 75,855 

 Retained earnings 23,422 4,316 

 Accumulated other comprehensive income 967 814 

 129,076 81,211 

Less treasury stock, at cost – 1,297,466 and 1,731,386 shares as of 

 May 31, 2007 and 2006 

 

(3,500) 

 

(4,812) 

Total stockholders’ equity 125,576 76,399 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 242,909 $188,276 

See accompanying notes. 
-49- 

Matrix Service Company 

Consolidated Statements of Operations 

(In thousands, except per share data) 

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 

 

Revenues $ 639,846 $ 493,927 $ 439,138 

Cost of revenues 573,960 446,848 408,119 

Gross profit 65,886 47,079 31,019 

Selling, general and administrative expenses 32,763 28,775 40,335 

Impairment and abandonment costs - 70 26,168 

Restructuring 73 536 3,654 

 

Operating income (loss) 33,050 17,698 (39,138) 

Other income (expense): 

 

 Interest expense (2,403) (7,765) (5,722) 

 Interest income 139 88 2 

 Other 328 1,573 400 

 

Income (loss) before income taxes 31,114 11,594 (44,458) 

Provision for (benefit from) federal, state and 

 foreign income taxes 

 

11,943 

 

3,941 

 

(5,628) 

 

Net income (loss) $ 19,171 $ 7,653 $ (38,830) 

 

Basic earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.83 $ 0.39 $ (2.24) 

Diluted earnings (loss) per common share $ 0.74 $ 0.35 $ (2.24) 

Weighted average common shares outstanding: 

 Basic 23,056 19,652 17,327 

 Diluted 26,752 25,742 17,327 

See accompanying notes. 
-50- 

Matrix Service Company 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity 

(In thousands, except share data) 

 Accumulated Other 

Comprehensive Income 

Common (Loss) 

Stock 

Additional 

Paid-In 

Capital 

Retained 

Earnings 

(Deficit) 

Treasury 

Stock Translation Derivative Total 

Balances, May 31, 2004 $ 193 $ 56,101 $ 35,585 $(5,769) $ (239) $ (156) $ 85,715 

 Net loss - - (38,830) - - - (38,830) 

 Other comprehensive 

 income 

 Translation adjustment - - - - 283 - 283 

 Derivative activity - - - - - 90 90 

 Comprehensive loss (38,457) 

 Exercise of stock options 

 (211,200 shares) - 33 (62) 568 - - 539 

 Tax effect of exercised 

 stock options - 

 

188 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

- 

 

188 

Balances, May 31, 2005 193 56,322 (3,307) (5,201) 44 (66) 47,985 

 Net income - - 7,653 - - - 7,653 

 Other comprehensive 

 income 

 Translation adjustment - - - - 770 - 770 

 Derivative activity - - - - - 66 66 

 Comprehensive income 8,489 

 Conversion of convertible 

 notes (1,002,275 

 shares) 10 4,291 - - - - 4,301 

 Issuance of additional 

 common stock 

 (2,307,692 shares) 23 

 

14,859 

 

- - - 

 

- 

 

14,882 

 Exercise of stock options 

 (142,364 shares) - 74 (30) 389 - - 433 

 Tax effect of exercised 

 stock options - 

 

309 - - - - 309 

Balances, May 31, 2006 226 75,855 4,316 (4,812) 814 - 76,399 

 Net income - - 19,171 - - - 19,171 

 Other comprehensive 

 income 

 Translation adjustment - - - - 153 - 153 

 Comprehensive income 19,324 

 Conversion of convertible 

 notes (5,292,974 

 shares) 53 23,623 - - - - 23,676 

 Exercise of stock options 

 (433,920 shares) - 1,324 (65) 1,312 - - 2,571 

 Tax effect of exercised 

 stock options - 

 

2,132 

 

- 

 

 - 

 

- 

 

- 

 

2,132 

 Stock-based 

 compensation expense - 1,474 - - - - 1,474 

Balances, May 31, 2007 $ 279 $ 104,408 $ 23,422 $ (3,500) $ 967 $ - $ 125,576 

See accompanying notes. 
-51- 

Matrix Service Company 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 

(In thousands)

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 

 

Operating activities: 

Net income (loss) $ 19,171 $ 7,653 $ (38,830) 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net 

 cash provided by operating activities: 

 Depreciation and amortization 6,500 5,698 6,726 

 Deferred income tax (1,442) 1,316 (4,144) 

Impairment of goodwill - - 25,000 

 Impairment of fixed assets - 70 1,168 

 Contract dispute reserve - - 10,333 

 Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment (186) (1,554) (382) 

 Allowance for uncollectible accounts 189 587 562 

 Stock-based compensation expense 1,474 - - 

 Accretion on acquisition payable 206 271 365 

 Amortization of debt issuance costs 372 2,660 904 

 Amortization of prepaid interest 1,069 1,921 175 

 Changes in operating assets and liabilities 

 increasing (decreasing) cash: 

 Receivables (22,957) 10,946 (13,528) 

 Costs and estimated earnings in excess 

 of billings on uncompleted contracts (21,096) (1,945) (3,879) 

 Inventories (1,369) (990) (155) 

 Prepaid expenses and other assets (3,879) (848) (2,125) 

 Accounts payable 5,590 9,093 10,530 

 Billings on uncompleted contracts in 

 excess of costs and estimated earnings 22,166 (348) 4,196 

 Accrued expenses 4,333 (2,075) 7,220 

 Income tax receivable/payable 1,217 3,412 404 

 Other - 13 (24) 

Net cash provided by operating activities 11,358 35,880 4,516 

 

Investing activities: 

Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (13,120) (5,614) (1,430) 

Proceeds from asset sales 288 7,046 1,784 

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities $ (12,832) $ 1,432 $ 354 

See accompanying notes. 
-52- 

Matrix Service Company 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued) 

(In thousands)

 Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 

 

Financing activities: 

Issuance of common stock $ 2,571 $ 15,315 $ 539 

Advances under bank credit facility 126,740 142,601 166,913 

Repayments of bank credit facility (126,740) (185,280) (193,065) 

Issuance of convertible notes - - 30,000 

Prepayment of interest on convertible notes - - (4,200) 

Payment of debt issuance costs (145) (929) (2,563) 

Capital lease payments (671) (416) (40) 

Repayment of other notes (1,880) (1,862) (1,745) 

Tax benefit of exercised stock options 2,132 - - 

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities 2,007 (30,571) (4,161) 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 29 348 35 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 562 7,089 744 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 8,585 1,496 752 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 9,147 $ 8,585 $ 1,496 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information 

 Cash paid (received) during the period for: 

 Income taxes $ 10,034 $ (810) $ (1,890) 

 Interest $ 723 $ 3,024 $ 8,476 

Non-cash investing and financing activities: 

 Equipment acquired through capital leases $ 1,316 $ 1,016 $ 384 

 Purchases of property, plant and equipment on 

 account 

 

 $ 142 

 

 $ 711 

 

 $ - 

Conversion of convertible notes $ 25,000 $ 5,000 $ - 

See accompanying notes. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

-53-

Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 

Organization and Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Matrix Service Company (“Matrix Service” 

or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. Intercompany transactions and 

balances have been eliminated in consolidation. 

The Company operates primarily in the United States and has operations in Canada. The Company’s 

reportable segments are Construction Services and Repair and Maintenance Services. 

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the 

United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported 

in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

Revenue Recognition

Matrix Service records profits on fixed-price contracts on a percentage-of-completion basis, primarily 

based on costs incurred to date compared to the total estimated contract cost. Matrix Service records 

revenue on reimbursable and time and material contracts based on a proportional performance basis as 

costs are incurred. Contracts in process are valued at cost plus accrued profits less billings on 

uncompleted contracts. Contracts are generally considered substantially complete when field 

construction is completed. The elapsed time from award of a contract to completion of performance may 

be in excess of one year. Matrix Service includes pass-through revenue and costs on cost-plus 

contracts, which are customer-reimbursable materials, equipment and subcontractor costs, when Matrix 

Service determines that it is responsible for the procurement and management of such cost components 

on behalf of the customer. 

Matrix Service has numerous contracts that are in various stages of completion which require estimates 

to determine the appropriate cost and revenue recognition. Matrix Service has a history of making 

reasonably dependable estimates of the extent of progress towards completion, contract revenues and 

contracts costs, and accordingly, does not believe significant fluctuations are likely to materialize. 

However, current estimates may be revised as additional information becomes available. If estimates of 

costs to complete fixed-price contracts indicate a loss, provision is made through a contract write-down 

for the total loss anticipated. A number of our contracts contain various cost and performance incentives 

and penalties that impact the earnings we realize from our contracts, and adjustments related to these 

incentives and penalties are recorded in the period, on a percentage-of-completion basis, when estimable 

and probable. 

Indirect costs (such as salaries and benefits, supplies and tools, equipment costs and insurance costs) 

are charged to projects based upon direct labor hours and overhead allocation rates per direct labor hour. 

Warranty costs are normally incurred prior to project completion and are charged to project costs as they 

are incurred. Warranty costs incurred subsequent to project completion were not material for the periods 

presented. Overhead allocation rates are established annually during the budgeting process and 

evaluated for accuracy throughout the year based upon actual direct labor hours and actual costs 

incurred. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-54- 

Claims Recognition

Claims are amounts in excess of the agreed contract price (or amounts not included in the original 

contract price) that we seek to collect from customers or others for delays, errors in specifications and 

designs, contract terminations, change orders in dispute or unapproved as to both scope and price or 

other causes of anticipated additional costs incurred by us. Recognition of amounts as additional contract 

revenue related to claims is appropriate only if it is probable that the claims will result in additional 

contract revenue and if the amount can be reliably estimated. We must determine if: 

• there is a legal basis for the claim; 

• the additional costs were caused by circumstances that were unforeseen by the Company and are 

not the result of deficiencies in our performance; 

• the costs are identifiable or determinable and are reasonable in view of the work performed; and 

• the evidence supporting the claim is objective and verifiable. 

If all of these requirements are met, revenue from a claim is recorded only to the extent that we have 

incurred costs relating to the claim. 

Cash Equivalents

The Company includes as cash equivalents all investments with original maturities of three months or less 

which are readily convertible into cash. The carrying value of cash equivalents approximates fair value. 

Approximately $0.3 million of cash as of May 31, 2007 is classified as Other Assets as it is restricted for 

use under an alliance agreement with a customer. 

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are carried on a gross basis, less the allowance for uncollectible accounts. The 

Company grants credit without requiring collateral to customers that are primarily major integrated oil 

companies, independent refiners and marketers, power companies, petrochemical companies, pipelines, 

contractors and engineering firms. Although this potentially exposes the Company to the risks of 

individual customer defaults or depressed cycles in these industries, our contracts require payment as 

projects progress or advance payment in some circumstances. In addition, in most cases we can place 

liens against the property, plant or equipment constructed or terminate the contract if a material contract 

default occurs. Management estimates the allowance for uncollectible accounts based on existing 

economic conditions, the financial conditions of the customers and the amount and age of past due 

accounts. Accounts are written off against the allowance for uncollectible accounts only after all 

collection attempts have been exhausted. 

Contract Dispute Receivables

Contract Dispute Receivables are comprised of accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in 

excess of billings for which settlement is subject to legal proceedings such as mediation, arbitration or 

litigation. Such proceedings have resulted in delays in obtaining resolution. As a result, the balances are 

presented separately on the balance sheet at estimated net realizable value based upon the most current 

information available. Amounts ultimately received may differ from the current estimate. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-55- 

Loss Contingencies

Various legal actions, claims and other contingencies arise in the normal course of our business. 

Contingencies are recorded in the consolidated financial statements, or are otherwise disclosed, in 

accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”. Specific reserves are provided for loss 

contingencies to the extent we conclude their occurrence is both probable and estimable. We use a 

case-by-case evaluation of the underlying data and update our evaluation as further information becomes 

known. We believe that any amounts exceeding our recorded accruals should not materially affect our 

financial position, results of operations or liquidity. However, the results of litigation are inherently 

unpredictable and the possibility exists that the ultimate resolution of one or more of these matters could 

result in a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. 

Legal costs are expensed as incurred. 

Inventories

Inventories consist primarily of raw materials and are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. 

Cost is determined primarily using the average cost method. 

Depreciation

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the depreciable 

assets. Depreciable lives are as follows: buildings – 40 years, construction equipment – 3 to 15 years, 

transportation equipment – 3 to 5 years, and furniture and fixtures – 3 to 10 years. 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates long-lived assets, including intangibles, for impairment when events or changes 

in circumstances indicate, in management’s judgment, that the carrying value of such assets used in 

operations may not be recoverable. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based 

on management’s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the assets as compared to 

the carrying value of the assets. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized 

is determined by estimating the fair value for the assets and recording a loss provision if the carrying 

value is greater than fair value. 

For assets identified to be disposed of in the future, the carrying value of the assets are compared to the 

estimated fair value less the cost of disposal to determine if an impairment is required. Until the assets 

are disposed of, an estimate of the fair value is redetermined when related events or circumstances 

change. In fiscal 2005, the Company evaluated certain long-lived assets for impairment resulting in 

impairment charges of $1.2 million, including $0.4 million for impairment of an asset held for sale. In 

fiscal 2006, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.1 million. There were no impairment 

charges recorded in fiscal 2007. 

Goodwill

Goodwill and intangible assts with indefinite useful lives are not amortized and are tested at least annually 

for impairment. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of acquisitions over the fair value of 

the net assets acquired. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment by first comparing management’s estimate 

of the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. Reporting units for purposes 

of goodwill impairment calculations are our reportable segments. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-56- 

Management utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the estimated fair value of our 

reporting units. Judgments and assumptions related to revenue, gross margins, operating expenses, 

interest, capital expenditures, cash flow and market assumptions are inherent in these estimates. As a 

result, use of alternate judgments and/or assumptions could result in a fair value that differs from our 

estimate and ultimately result in the recognition of impairment charges in the financial statements. We 

utilize various scenarios and assign probabilities to each of these scenarios in our discounted cash flow 

analysis. The results of the discounted cash flow analysis are then compared to the carrying value of the 

reporting unit. 

If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, a computation of the implied fair value of 

goodwill is compared with its related carrying value. If the carrying value of the reporting unit goodwill 

exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in the amount of the 

excess. If an impairment charge is incurred, it would negatively impact our results of operations and 

financial position. We perform our annual analysis during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year and in any 

other period in which indicators of impairment warrant an additional analysis. 

At the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2005, due to the existence of several indicators of impairment, we 

performed an impairment analysis. As a result of the analysis, the fair value of the Construction Services 

segment was estimated to be $32.0 million compared to a carrying value of $57.0 million, resulting in an 

impairment of $25.0 million. No impairment was indicated for our Repair and Maintenance Services 

segment. 

Insurance Reserves

We maintain insurance coverage for various aspects of our operations. However, we retain exposure to 

potential losses through the use of deductibles, coverage limits and self-insured retentions. As of May 

31, 2007 and May 31, 2006, insurance reserves totaling $6.4 million are reflected on our consolidated 

balance sheet. These amounts represent our best estimate of our ultimate obligations for asserted 

claims, insurance premium true-up estimates and incurred but not yet reported claims at the balance 

sheet dates. We establish specific reserves for claims using case-by-case evaluations of the underlying 

claim data and update our evaluations as further information becomes known. Judgments and 

assumptions are inherent in our reserve accruals; as a result, changes in assumptions or claims 

experience could result in changes to these estimates in the future. Additionally, the actual results of 

claim settlements could differ from the amounts estimated. 

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are computed using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets and liabilities 

are recognized based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets 

and liabilities using presently enacted tax rates. 

Stock Option Plans

Prior to June 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock options granted under its stock-based 

compensation plans (“Plans”) pursuant to the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting 

Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, 

as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 

123”). Therefore, compensation cost for stock options was not recognized in the Consolidated 

Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ending May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2005, as all options 

granted under the Plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock 

on the date of the grant. Effective June 1, 2006 the Company adopted the fair value recognition 

provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment (”SFAS No. 123(R)”), using the modifiedprospective method. Under this method, compensation cost for all share-based awards is recognized 

over the requisite service period. As required under the modified-prospective method, results for prior 

periods have not been restated. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-57- 

Recent Accounting Standards

FIN 48 – Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes 

In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in 

Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes”. FIN 48 

clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position 

is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance 

on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, 

disclosure and transition. The interpretation applies to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to 

FASB Statement No. 109. 

FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Differences between the amounts 

recognized in the statements of financial position prior to the adoption of FIN 48 and the amounts 

reported after adoption should be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded to the 

beginning balance of retained earnings. The Company will adopt FIN 48 effective June 1, 2007 and is 

currently in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of FIN 48 will have on its financial 

position, consolidated results of operations and cash flows. 

SFAS No. 157 – Fair Value Measurements 

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS No. 157). This 

Statement establishes a framework for fair value measurements in the financial statements by providing a 

definition of fair value, provides guidance on the methods used to estimate fair value and expands 

disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after 

November 15, 2007 and is generally applied prospectively. The Company is currently assessing the 

impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements. 

SFAS No. 159 – The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an 

Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), 

“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB 

Statement No. 115”. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and 

certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has 

been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS 159 is effective for 

fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a 

material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-58- 

Note 2. Uncompleted Contracts 

Contract terms of the Company’s construction contracts generally provide for progress billings based on 

completion of certain phases of the work. The excess of costs incurred and estimated earnings 

recognized for construction contracts over amounts billed on uncompleted contracts is reported as a 

current asset. The excess of amounts billed over costs incurred and estimated earnings recognized for 

construction contracts on uncompleted contracts is reported as a current liability. Gross and net amounts 

on uncompleted contracts are as follows: 

 As of May 31, 

2007 2006 

 (In thousands) 

Costs incurred and estimated earnings recognized on 

 uncompleted contracts 

 

 $ 697,045 

 

 $ 478,436 

Billings on uncompleted contracts 685,654 465,976 

 $ 11,391 $ 12,460 

 

Shown on balance sheet as: 

 Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on 

 uncompleted contracts 

 

 $ 45,634 

 

 $ 24,538 

 Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of 

 costs and estimated earnings 34,243 12,078 

 $ 11,391 $ 12,460 

Progress billings in accounts receivable at May 31, 2007 and 2006 included retentions to be collected 

within one year of $8.6 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Contract retentions collectible beyond one 

year are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets and totaled $7.5 million at May 31, 

2007 and $2.9 million at May 31, 2006. Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and 

estimated earnings at May 31, 2007 included an estimated accrued loss of $3.8 million on a construction 

project that was partially complete at that date. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-59- 

Note 3. Property Sales and Assets Held for Sale 

Asset Sales 

In fiscal 2006, the Company completed several sales of excess assets identified in the Company’s fiscal 

2005 restructuring plan (see Note 14) including: 

• A fabrication facility in Tulsa, Oklahoma was sold for $0.7 million, the proceeds approximated the 

book value of the asset. The asset was previously classified as held for sale. 

• Excess construction equipment was sold for net proceeds of $1.7 million, including $0.2 million 

for services to be provided in the future. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $0.6 million 

and these services have been provided. 

• A fabrication facility and land in Holmes, Pennsylvania was sold for $0.7 million. The asset was 

previously classified as held for sale and the sale resulted in a gain of approximately $0.4 million. 

• A Bethlehem, Pennsylvania fabrication facility was sold for $3.5 million, $0.5 million of which was 

in the form of a 12% promissory note. The sale resulted in a gain of $0.4 million. In November 

2006, the buyer prepaid the remaining deferred obligation. 

• A corporate facility which was sold was subsequently leased back from the buyer. The net 

proceeds from the sale were approximately $0.7 million. No gain or loss was recognized on the 

sale, as the facility was previously impaired $0.1 million in fiscal 2006 to adjust the carrying value 

of the facility to the estimated sale proceeds. 

Assets Held for Sale 

In fiscal 2005, the Company identified various assets as available for sale under the then current 

business plan. Certain of the assets were sold in fiscal 2006, as discussed above. The Company still 

holds excess land located in Orange, California, for which a sale is pending. The carrying value of the 

excess land at May 31, 2007 was $0.8 million, which approximates the expected net proceeds from the 

pending sale. The land is included in current assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and 

is reflected in the Company’s “Other” segment in Note 15. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-60- 

Note 4. Goodwill 

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 by 

segment follow: 

Construction 

Services 

 Repair and 

Maintenance 

Services 

 

Total 

(In thousands) 

Balance at May 31, 2005 $ 5,941 $ 18,893 $ 24,834 

Disposition (Note 3) (1,485) - (1,485) 

Purchase price adjustment 

 (Note 7) (141) (61) (202) 

Translation adjustment - 295 295 

Balance at May 31, 2006 4,315 19,127 23,442 

Purchase price adjustment 

 (Note 7) 

 

(110) 

 

(47) (157) 

Translation adjustment - 72 72 

Balance at May 31, 2007 $ 4,205 $ 19,152 $ 23,357 

In fiscal 2006, the Company sold its Bethlehem, Pennsylvania fabrication facility and retired the 

associated goodwill of $1.5 million. In addition, in both fiscal 2006 and fiscal 2007, a deferred tax asset 

valuation allowance relating to a 2003 acquisition was reversed that resulted in the goodwill adjustments. 

Note 5. Debt 

Effective November 30, 2006, the Company entered into a Second Amended and Restated Credit 

Agreement (Credit Agreement), which provides for a five-year, $75.0 million senior revolving credit facility 

(Credit Facility). The Company may elect to increase the total capacity under the Credit Agreement up to 

$100.0 million, with the approval of the administrative agent and is currently in the process of seeking 

such approval. The Credit Agreement is guaranteed by substantially all of the Company’s subsidiaries 

and is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Credit Facility replaced a 

$50.0 million senior revolving credit facility that would have expired in December 2008. 

The Credit Facility may be used for working capital, issuance of letters of credit or other lawful corporate 

purposes. The Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants that place 

certain restrictions on the Company, including limits on new debt, operating and capital lease obligations, 

restrictions on capital expenditures, asset sales and certain distributions. Significant financial covenants 

include the following: 

 Senior Leverage Ratio not to exceed 2.50 to 1.00; 

 Asset Coverage Ratio to be greater than 1.45 to 1.00; 

 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio to be greater than 1.25 to 1.00; and 

 Tangible Net Worth must be greater than the sum of $55.6 million plus 75% of positive net 

income after August 31, 2006 and net proceeds from the sale of any equity securities. 

At the Company’s option, amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility bear interest at LIBOR or an 

Alternate Base Rate, plus in each case, an additional margin based on the Senior Leverage Ratio. The 

Alternate Base Rate is the greater of the Prime Rate or the Fed Funds Effective Rate, plus 0.5%. The 

additional margin ranges from 0.00% to 0.75% on the Alternate Base Rate loans and 1.50% to 2.25% on 

LIBOR-based loans. Since the closing date, the Company has been at the lowest interest rate tier for 

both LIBOR and Alternate Base Rate loans. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-61- 

On May 31, 2007, no loans were outstanding under the Credit Facility; however, the Company utilized 

$8.6 million for letters of credit. The remaining $66.4 million is available and subject to an unused 

revolving credit facility fee ranging from 0.25% to 0.50%. 

Effective July 6, 2007, the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Second Amended and 

Restated Credit Agreement (the ”Amendment”). 

The Amendment reduces the Applicable Rate on Alternate Base Rate and LIBOR borrowings. The 

Applicable Rate was reduced to a range of 0% to 0.25% in the case of an Alternate Base rate revolving 

loan and from 1.00% to 1.75% in the case of an Adjusted LIBO Rate revolving loan, in each case based 

on the Company’s most recently reported “Senior Leverage Ratio.” In addition, the Unused Revolving 

Credit Facility Fee was reduced to a range of 0.175% to 0.375%. 

The Amendment also eliminates restrictions on capital spending by dropping the Capital Expenditures 

limitation and amending the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. Previously, capital expenditures could not 

exceed $15.0 million in any fiscal year. The Revolving Credit Termination Date was also extended from 

November 30, 2011 to November 30, 2012. 

Convertible Debt 

In connection with the private placement of $30.0 million of five-year convertible notes, on April 25, 2005, 

the Company entered into a registration rights agreement with the investors in the convertible notes. The 

convertible notes bore interest at a rate of 7% per year. An initial interest pre-payment of $4.2 million was 

made on April 25, 2005 for the period to and including April 25, 2007. 

The notes were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of 

$4.69 per share, subject to adjustment for stock dividends, stock splits or other matters as provided for in 

the convertible notes. In fiscal 2006, $5.0 million of the convertible notes were converted by note holders 

into 1,002,275 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. In fiscal 2007, the remaining note balance of 

$25.0 million was converted into 5,292,974 shares of common stock. On July 9, 2007, the Company filed 

a post-effective amendment to the resale registration statement deregistering all remaining unsold 

shares. 

Note 6. Acquisition Payable 

As part of an acquisition in fiscal 2003, the Company entered into an acquisition payable for a portion of 

the purchase price. The acquisition payable is recorded at $2.7 million at May 31, 2007 and is accreted 

for the change in its present value each period utilizing a 5.1% effective interest rate. The final payment of 

$2.8 million is due on March 7, 2008. The fair value of the acquisition approximated the carrying value at 

May 31, 2007. 

Pursuant to the purchase agreement, the former shareholders of the acquired entity agreed, jointly and 

severally, to indemnify Matrix Service for damages it suffers due to breaches of representations and 

warranties made by the shareholders with respect to, among other things, its employee benefit plans, the 

ownership, use and condition of its assets and the performance by the acquired company of its 

contractual obligations, and its obligations under applicable laws, including employment and 

environmental laws. As to these matters, Matrix Service may recover its damages only if its claims for 

damages are made by March 7, 2008, the amount of damages claimed as to any single event exceeds a 

de minimus amount of $10,000, and only after the aggregate amount of all such claims, excluding de 

minimus claims, exceeds $250,000. In order to better assure the payment to Matrix Service of any claims 

by it for indemnity, $10 million of the purchase price was withheld in the form of a deferred purchase price 

payable to the former shareholders or their designee. Upon final determination that a claim for indemnity 

is proper, the amount of the claim can be deducted by Matrix Service from the deferred payments of the 

purchase price. Since the purchase date on March 7, 2003, Matrix Service claims have not exceeded 

$250,000, and thus no adjustment to the deferred purchase price has been made related to 

indemnifications by the former shareholders of the acquired company as of May 31, 2007. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-62- 

Note 7. Income Taxes 

The components of the provision for (benefit from) income taxes are as follows: 

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 

 (In thousands) 

Current: 

 Federal $ 11,321 $ 1,433 $ (1,660) 

 State 1,786 783 89 

 Foreign 278 376 87 

13,385 2,592 (1,484) 

Deferred: 

 Federal (1,007) 958 (4,083) 

 State (434) 411 (70) 

 Foreign (1) (20) 9 

 (1,442) 1,349 (4,144) 

$ 11,943 $ 3,941 $ (5,628) 

The difference between the expected income tax provision applying the domestic federal statutory tax 

rate and the reported income tax provision is as follows: 

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 

 (In thousands) 

Expected provision (benefit) for Federal 

 income taxes at the statutory rate $ 10,890 $ 3,942 

 

 $ (15,560) 

State income taxes, net of Federal benefit 1,120 793 (2,867) 

Charges without tax benefit 529 562 10,266 

Change in valuation allowance (764) (1,401) 2,520 

Other 168 45 13 

Provision (benefit) for income taxes $ 11,943 $ 3,941 $ (5,628) 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-63- 

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets as of May 31, 2007 and 2006 

are as follows: 

 As of May 31, 

2007 2006 

 (In thousands) 

Deferred tax liabilities: 

 Tax over book depreciation $ 2,700 $ 3,362 

 Other - net 459 425 

Total deferred tax liabilities 3,159 3,787 

Deferred tax assets: 

 Bad debt reserve 102 2,181 

 Foreign insurance dividend 132 132 

 Vacation accrual 118 50 

 Insurance reserve 1,101 390 

 Noncompete amortization 100 153 

 Net operating loss benefit and credit carryforwards 2,564 3,431 

 Valuation allowance (2,149) (3,431) 

 Accrued losses 1,618 161 

 Other - net 344 49 

Total deferred tax assets 3,930 3,116 

Net deferred tax asset (liability) $ 771 $ (671) 

As reported in the consolidated balance sheets: 

 As of May 31, 

 2007 2006 

 (In thousands) 

Current deferred tax assets $ 3,283 $ 2,831 

Non-current deferred tax liabilities (2,512) (3,502) 

Net deferred tax asset (liability) $ 771 $ (671) 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-64- 

In connection with a previous acquisition, the Company acquired the tax benefits of federal and state 

operating losses and credit carryforwards in the amount of $3.6 million, of which $1.8 million was 

reserved. The utilization of a portion of the loss carryforwards is subject to annual limitations. Any 

reversal of these original reserves will be allocated to reduce goodwill. In fiscal 2005, none of the 

operating loss and credit carryforwards were utilized and the future utilization of the operating losses and 

credit carryforwards became doubtful. Therefore, the remaining balance of these benefits were fully 

reserved in fiscal 2005. In fiscal 2006, a portion of the operating losses and credit carryforwards which 

had been previously reserved were utilized. This resulted in the reversal of the related valuation 

allowance which reduced the fiscal 2006 tax provision by $1.4 million and reduced goodwill by $0.2 

million. 

The state tax benefit carryforwards generated in fiscal 2006 were subject to limitations and their future 

utilization was doubtful. Therefore, these benefits were fully reserved in fiscal 2006. 

In fiscal 2007, a portion of the state operating loss carryforwards and related valuation reserves were 

reduced as a result of the merger of several of the Company’s legal entities. Also, some of the previously 

reserved net operating losses were utilized and the Oklahoma portion of the remaining carryforward was 

deemed to be fully utilizable. This resulted in the reversal of the related valuation allowance which 

reduced the current year tax provision by $0.8 million and reduced goodwill by $0.2 million. 

The loss carryforwards, including loss carryforwards generated prior to the acquisition, expire between 

2017 and 2025. 

Note 8. Contingencies 

Insurance Reserves 

The Company maintains insurance coverage for various aspects of our operations. However, we retain 

exposure to potential losses through the use of deductibles, coverage limits and self-insured retentions. 

Typically our contracts require us to indemnify our customers for injury, damage or loss arising from the 

performance of our services and provide for warranties for materials and workmanship. The Company 

may also be required to name the customer as an additional insured under certain insurance policies up 

to the limits of insurance available to us, or we may have to purchase special insurance policies or surety 

bonds for specific customers. Matrix Service generally requires its subcontractors to indemnify the 

Company and the Company’s customer plus name the Company as an additional insured for activities 

arising out of the subcontractors’ presence at the customer’s location. Certain subcontractors must also 

provide additional insurance policies, including surety bonds in favor of the Company, to secure the 

subcontractor’s work or as required by the subcontract. Matrix Service maintains a performance and 

payment bonding line of $90.0 million. 

There can be no assurance that our insurance and the additional insurance coverage provided by our 

subcontractors will protect us against a valid claim or loss under the contracts with our customers. 

Legion Insurance Dispute 

Matrix Service, as plaintiff, has been in litigation with Mutual Indemnity and Mutual Risk Management Ltd. 

(“Mutual”) in the Tulsa County District Court in the State of Oklahoma over matters arising out of a 

workers’ compensation program with a former insurance provider, Legion Insurance Company (“Legion”). 

These matters involve disputes over a letter of credit (“LC”) for $2.1 million, a bond for $2.1 million and a 

deposit of $1.0 million pledged to secure Matrix Service’s obligations under this program. As a part of its 

insurance program, Legion used Mutual, an offshore insurance company. Matrix Service purchased 

preferred stock in Mutual, which then reinsured part of the workers’ compensation exposure that was 

underwritten by Legion. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-65- 

On April 1, 2002, the Insurance Commissioner for the State of Pennsylvania placed Legion into 

rehabilitation. Matrix Service was concerned that the security held by Mutual would be commingled with 

other shareholder assets and not used exclusively to pay Matrix Service claims. Matrix Service filed suit 

in the Tulsa County District Court to require a full accounting of all funds held by Mutual and restrain 

Mutual from drawing on the LC or surety bond. The court granted a temporary restraining order 

prohibiting the use of such assets for the payment of claims other than Matrix Service claims. 

On July 25, 2003, a Pennsylvania court placed Legion into liquidation. At that time, all open workers’ 

compensation claims were sent to the various state guaranty funds for handling. Many of the states have 

denied responsibility with respect to Matrix Service claims because Matrix Service’s net worth exceeded 

the statutory maximum as of December 31, 2002, the year preceding the Legion liquidation, under which 

claims would be handled by the individual state guaranty funds. Those states returned the claims back to 

Matrix Service for direct handling. In other states where Matrix Service has exposure, the state guaranty 

funds took over the claims. 

In November 2006, the Company settled and paid its outstanding obligations to Legion resulting from 

workers’ compensation claim payments made on Matrix Service’s behalf by Legion itself, and by the 

various state guaranty funds that sought reimbursement from Legion. Since these obligations have been 

satisfied, Matrix Service is working with Mutual to dismiss the lawsuit and limit Mutual’s security interests. 

The Company recognized a gain of less than $0.1 million as a result of the settlement with Legion. The 

Company believes it is adequately reserved for any additional claim payments or settlements with the 

state guaranty funds. 

Refinery Accident 

On November 6, 2005, two employees of the Company were fatally injured in an accident that occurred at 

a customer jobsite in Delaware City, Delaware. The estates of both employees have filed liability claims 

against the property owner. These claims have been tendered by the property owner to the Company for 

defense. The Company believes that it is adequately reserved or insured for this incident and any losses 

incurred are not expected to be significant. 

Unapproved Change Orders and Claims 

As of May 31, 2007 and May 31, 2006, accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of 

billings on uncompleted contracts included revenues, to the extent of costs incurred, for unapproved change 

orders of $5.1 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and claims of $1.5 million and $0.5 million, respectively. 

Amounts disclosed for unapproved change orders and claims exclude amounts associated with contract 

disputes disclosed in this Note 8. Generally, collection of amounts related to unapproved change orders 

and claims is expected within twelve months. However, customers generally will not pay these amounts 

to Matrix Service until final resolution of related claims, and accordingly, collection of these amounts may 

extend beyond one year. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-66- 

Contract Disputes 

At May 31, 2006, the Company had recorded net receivables of approximately $11.7 million under four 

contracts which were in dispute. In fiscal 2007, the Company settled three of the four disputes, comprising 

$10.7 million of the recorded net receivables, and collected $11.3 million under the settlements resulting in a 

$0.6 million pre-tax net gain. 

At May 31, 2007, the Company has one remaining contract dispute, which has a recorded value of $1.0 

million. In March 2000, the Company entered into a joint venture partnership (JV) agreement for the 

construction of a pulp and paper project for an owner, which was completed late in 2000. The services 

provided by the JV consisted primarily of a labor contract with the owner supplying the engineering and the 

majority of the materials to be installed. The claim arises out of a contractual dispute in which the Company 

believes the JV incurred substantial work because the owner’s planning and engineering on the project was 

not adequate. The owner did not pay amounts owed and claims that the JV was not properly licensed by 

the Oregon Contractors Licensing Board, and therefore not eligible to file a lawsuit under Oregon law. An 

Oregon state court ruled in favor of the owner regarding the licensing issue and the Company appealed the 

decision. 

The Oregon Court of Appeals subsequently ruled that the dispute should be settled in arbitration. That 

ruling has been upheld by the Oregon Supreme Court. The Company will proceed with arbitration which 

has been scheduled for January of 2008 and expects a full resolution of this matter to occur within the next 

twelve months. The Company believes it has a valid claim for the amount owed. 

Other 

The Company and its subsidiaries are named as defendants in various other legal actions and are 

vigorously defending each of them. It is the opinion of management that none of the known legal actions 

will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity. 

Note 9. Commitments 

The company is the lessee under operating leases covering real estate, office equipment and vehicles. 

Future minimum lease payments at May 31, 2007 total $4.6 million and are payable as follows: fiscal 

2008 - $1.0 million; fiscal 2009 - $0.8 million; fiscal 2010 - $0.8 million; fiscal 2011 - $0.6 million; fiscal 

2012 - $0.5 million and thereafter - $0.9 million. Operating lease expense was $1.2 million, $1.4 million 

and $1.9 million for the years ended May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Operating lease 

expense associated with related party leases was $0.3 million for the year ended May 31, 2007, $0.4 

million for the year ended May 31, 2006 and $0.3 million for the year ended May 31, 2005. 

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity 

Preferred Stock 

The Company has 5.0 million shares of preferred stock authorized, none of which was issued or 

outstanding at May 31, 2007 or 2006. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-67- 

Preferred Share Purchase Rights 

The Company’s Board of Directors authorized and directed a dividend of one preferred share purchase 

right for each common share outstanding on November 12, 1999 and authorized and directed the 

issuance of one right per common share for any shares issued after that date. These rights, which expire 

November 12, 2009, will be exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15 percent or more of the 

Company’s common stock or announces a tender offer that would result in ownership of 15 percent or 

more of the common stock. Each right will entitle stockholders to buy one one-hundredth of a share of 

preferred stock at an exercise price of $40. In addition, the rights enable holders to either acquire 

additional shares of the Company’s common stock or purchase the stock of an acquiring company at a 

discount, depending on specific circumstances. The rights may be redeemed by the Company in whole, 

but not in part, for one cent per right. 

In connection with the issuance of the convertible notes described under Note 5. Debt and the private 

placement of common stock on October 3, 2005, the Company amended the Rights Agreement for the 

preferred share purchase rights. The amendments render the provisions of the Rights Agreement 

inapplicable to the investors in the two private placements by exempting them from the definition of 

“acquiring person” as a result of the purchase of the convertible notes and common stock. 

Private Placement of Common Stock 

On October 3, 2005, the Company completed a private placement of approximately 2.3 million shares of 

common stock. The common stock was sold at $6.50 per share. The net proceeds from the issuance 

were approximately $14.9 million. The Company used the proceeds to repay a portion of the then 

outstanding balance on the Company’s revolving line of credit in order to provide additional liquidity for 

working capital needs. 

In connection with the private placement of common stock, on October 3, 2005, the Company entered 

into a registration rights agreement with the purchasers of the common stock. The registration rights 

agreement required us to file a registration statement with respect to the resale of the shares of the 

common stock issued in the private placement. The registration statement was filed with the SEC on 

October 20, 2005 and was declared effective by the SEC on October 28, 2005. The registration rights 

agreement also requires the use of our best efforts to keep the registration statement continuously 

effective until the earlier of (a) the date on which all of the common stock covered by such registration 

statement has been sold or may be sold without volume restrictions pursuant to Rule 144(k) under the 

Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or (b) the fifth anniversary of the date the registration statement is 

declared effective by the SEC. If we fail to satisfy our obligations under the registration rights agreement, 

we will owe the holders of the common stock as partial liquidated damages an amount in cash equal to 

1% of the aggregate amount paid for the common stock for each such event, and an additional 1% 

thereafter on each monthly anniversary of each such event (if the applicable failure shall not have been 

cured by such date) until the applicable failure is cured. 

Treasury Shares 

In October 2000, the Board of Directors authorized a stock buyback program, which permitted the purchase 

of up to 20% (i.e., 3,447,506 shares) of our common stock outstanding at that time. To date, Matrix Service 

has purchased 2,116,800 shares under the program and has authorization to purchase an additional 

1,330,706 shares. Although the Company did not repurchase any common shares in fiscal 2007, Matrix 

Service intends to repurchase shares in future periods if accretive to earnings. The Company has 

1,297,466 treasury shares remaining as of May 31, 2007 and intends to utilize these treasury shares solely 

for the satisfaction of stock issuances under the 1990, 1991 and 2004 stock plans and the 1995 

Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-68- 

Note 11. Stock-Based Compensation 

As discussed in Note 1., the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R) effective June 1, 2006. Total stockbased compensation expense for the year ended May 31, 2007 was $1.5 million. Measured but 

unrecognized stock-based compensation expense at May 31, 2007 totaled $4.5 million. This amount is 

comprised of $1.5 million related to stock options and $3.0 million related to nonvested deferred shares. 

These amounts are expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of 2.2 years. 

As a result of adopting SFAS No. 123(R), the Company’s net income for the year ended May 31, 2007 

was $1.0 million lower than if the Company had continued to account for share-based compensation 

under APB No. 25 as permitted by SFAS No. 123. Basic and diluted earnings per share were $0.04 per 

share lower for the year ended May 31, 2007 due to implementation of SFAS No. 123(R). 

The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share for the years 

ended May 31, 2006 and May 31, 2005 as if the Company had applied the fair value provisions of SFAS 

No. 123: 

 Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

 2006 2005 

(In thousands, except per share amounts) 

Net income (loss) as reported $ 7,653 $ (38,830) 

Pro forma compensation expense from stock 

options, net of tax effects 

 

 (853) 

 

 (351) 

Pro forma net income (loss) $ 6,800 $ (39,181) 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share as reported: 

 Basic $ 0.39 $ (2.24) 

 Diluted $ 0.35 $ (2.24) 

 

Pro forma earnings (loss) per common share: 

 Basic $ 0.35 $ (2.26) 

 Diluted $ 0.32 $ (2.26) 

Plan Information 

The Company’s 1990 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “1990 Plan”), 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan 

(the “1991 Plan”), and 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) provide incentives for officers and 

other key employees of the Company. The Company also had a 1995 Nonemployee Directors’ Stock 

Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”). Under the 2004 Plan, incentive and non-qualified stock options may be 

granted to the Company’s key employees and non-qualified stock options may be granted to 

nonemployees who are elected for the first time as directors of the Company after January 1, 1991. 

Shareholders have authorized an aggregate of 1,800,000 options, 2,640,000 options, 500,000 options 

and 1,200,000 options to be granted under the 1990, 1991, 1995 and 2004 Plans, respectively. 

On October 23, 2006, the stockholders of the company approved an amendment to the 2004 Plan that 

expanded the type of awards that can be issued to include restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock 

appreciation rights and performance shares. The Company also terminated the 1995 Plan. The 

termination of the 1995 Plan did not effect options outstanding at the time of termination. At May 31, 

2007, there were approximately 784,000 shares available for grant under the 2004 Plan. There were no 

shares available for grant under either the 1990 or 1991 Plans. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-69- 

Stock Options 

Stock options are valued at the date of award and compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line 

basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period. Employee stock options generally 

vest annually, in equal increments, over a five-year period beginning one year after the grant date. 

Options granted to non-employee directors generally vest annually, in equal installments, over a two-year 

period beginning one year after the grant date. Under all stock option plans, the option term cannot 

exceed ten years. The option price per share may not be less than the fair market value of the common 

stock at the time the option is granted. The Company’s policy is to issue shares upon the exercise of 

stock options from its treasury shares, if available. 

Stock option activity and related information for the year ended May 31, 2007 is as follows: 

Stock Options Options

WeightedAverage 

Remaining 

Contractual 

Life

WeightedAverage 

Exercise 

Price

Aggregate 

Intrinsic Value

(Years) (In thousands) 

Outstanding at May 31, 2006 1,111,800 $ 6.66 

 Granted - 

 Exercised (433,920) $ 5.97 $ 6,182 

 Cancelled (8,000) $ 7.24 

Outstanding at May 31, 2007 669,880 6.7 $ 7.09 $ 12,366 

Vested or expected to vest at 

 May 31, 2007 621,129 

 

 6.6 

 

 $ 7.03 $ 11,506 

Exercisable at May 31, 2007 266,140 5.4 $ 5.82 $ 5,251 

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate grant date fair value for each 

stock option granted. Expected volatility is based on the historic volatility of the Company’s stock. The 

risk-free rate is based on the applicable United States Treasury Note rate. The expected life of the option 

is based on historical and expected future exercise behavior. 

There were no options granted in fiscal 2007. Assumptions used to calculate fiscal 2006 and 2005 grant 

date fair values and the fair values calculated were as follows: 

 2006 2005 

Grant date fair value $ 5.62 $ 2.90 

Risk-free interest rate 3.76% 3.71% 

Expected volatility 68.14% 64.71% 

Expected life in years 4.56 4.57 

Expected dividend yield - - 

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during fiscal 2007, 2006, and 2005 were $6.2 million, 

$1.0 million and $0.9 million, respectively. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-70- 

The following summarizes information about stock options at May 31, 2007: 

 Stock Options Outstanding Stock Options Exercisable 

Range of Exercise Price 

Options 

Outstanding 

WeightedAverage 

Exercise Price 

WeightedAverage 

Remaining 

Contractual Life

Options 

Exercisable 

WeightedAverage 

Exercise Price

WeightedAverage 

Remaining 

Contractual Life

 (Years) (Years) 

$ 2.13 - $ 2.41 75,300 $ 2.20 2.3 75,300 $ 2.20 2.3 

 3.03 - 3.70 66,800 3.44 5.0 47,400 3.33 4.8 

 4.08 - 5.49 212,800 4.68 7.6 57,200 4.40 7.6 

 8.93 - 12.20 314,980 10.67 7.5 86,240 11.29 6.9 

$ 2.13 - $ 12.20 669,880 $ 7.09 6.7 266,140 $ 5.82 5.4 

Nonvested Deferred Shares 

Subsequent to the approval of amendments to the 2004 Plan in October 2006, the Company issued 

263,130 nonvested deferred shares. A portion of the shares awarded to employees vest after three years 

if certain performance conditions are satisfied and the remaining shares generally vest in five equal 

annual installments beginning one year after the grant. All shares awarded to non-employee directors 

vest after three years if certain performance conditions are satisfied. Based on the actual performance as 

measured against the performance criteria, the performance-based portion of the award can range from 

zero to one hundred percent of the original award grant. 

Deferred shares are valued at market value on the grant date. Deferred share expense, net of estimated 

forfeitures, is generally recognized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. 

The following summary reflects nonvested deferred share activity and related information for the year 

ended May 31, 2007: 

Deferred Shares Shares 

Weighted Average Grant 

Date Fair Value 

Nonvested shares at May 31, 2006 - $ - 

Granted 263,130 14.79 

Vested - - 

Nonvested shares at May 31, 2007 263,130 $ 14.79 

Note 12. Earnings per Common Share 

Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated based on the weighted average shares outstanding during 

the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of employee and director stock options, 

as well as the dilutive effect of the convertible securities. Stock options are considered antidilutive 

whenever the exercise prices of the options exceed the average market price of the common stock during 

the period. Convertible debt is considered antidilutive whenever its interest (net of tax) per common 

share obtainable on conversion exceeds basic earnings per share. Stock options are considered dilutive 

whenever the exercise price is less than the average market price of the stock during the period. Dilutive 

convertible securities are calculated using the “if converted” method, in which all unconverted securities 

are assumed to be converted as of the beginning of the period. The “if converted” method also requires 

that any interest charges, net of tax, applicable to the securities be added back to net income for 

purposes of computing diluted earnings per share. Both stock options and convertible debt are 

considered antidilutive in the event of a net loss. 

Antidilutive options for the years ending May 31, 2006 and 2005 were 358,267 and 376,587, respectively. 

These options were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share. There were no 

antidilutive options for the year ended May 31, 2007. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-71- 

The computation of basic and diluted EPS is as follows: 

Fiscal Year Ended May 31, 

2007 2006 2005 

(In thousands, except per share data) 

Basic EPS: 

Net income (loss) $ 19,171 $ 7,653 $ (38,830) 

Weighted average shares outstanding 23,056 19,652 17,327 

Basic EPS $ 0.83 $ 0.39 $ (2.24) 

Diluted EPS: 

Net income (loss) $ 19,171 $ 7,653 $ (38,830) 

Convertible notes interest 

 expense (net of tax) 731 1,314 - 

Adjusted net income (loss) $ 19,902 $ 8,967 $ (38,830) 

Weighted average shares 

 outstanding - basic 23,056 19,652 17,327 

Dilutive stock options 430 393 - 

Dilutive nonvested deferred shares 24 - - 

Dilutive convertible note shares 3,242 5,697 - 

Dilutive weighted average shares 26,752 25,742 17,327 

Diluted EPS $ 0.74 $ 0.35 $ (2.24) 

Note 13. Employee Benefit Plan 

The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) savings plan (the “Plan”) for all eligible employees 

meeting length of service requirements. Participants may contribute an amount up to 25% of pretax 

annual compensation as defined in the Plan, subject to certain limitations in accordance with Section 

401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company matches employee contributions based on an 

annual calendar year discretionary election. In calendar years 2006 and 2005, the Company elected to 

match 50% of the first 6% of employee contributions. In calendar year 2007, the Company will match 

100% of the first 3% of employee contributions and 50% of the next 2% of employee contributions. 

The Company recognized cost relating to the Plan of $1.5 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million for the 

fiscal years ended May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-72- 

Note 14. Restructuring Activities 

Restructuring activities other than asset sales and debt refinancing of the Company consists of the 

following: 

Employee 

Severance 

Benefits 

Consulting 

Fees Acquisition

Other 

Costs 

 

Total 

(In thousands) 

Liability balance at May 31, 2004 $ - $ - $ 117 $ 192 $ 309 

Charge to income 1,479 1,607 - 568 3,654 

Payment (587) (1,182) (117) (218) (2,104) 

Liability balance at May 31, 2005 892 425 - 542 1,859 

Charge (credit) to income (19) 237 - 318 536 

Payment (873) (662) - (301) (1,836) 

Liability balance at May 31, 2006 - - - 559 559 

Charge to income - - - 73 73 

Payment - - - (365) (365) 

Liability balance at May 31, 2007 $ - $ - $ - $ 267 $ 267 

During fiscal year 2007, the Company charged $0.1 million of restructuring costs against earnings. The 

charges relate primarily to additional environmental accruals on a discontinued business and additional 

workers compensation costs. Payments of approximately $0.4 million were primarily payments of 

workers compensation claims relating to discontinued businesses made in conjunction with the Legion 

settlement discussed in Note. 8 Contingencies. The remaining liability of $0.3 million as of May 31, 2007 

is reflected in other accrued expenses. 

During fiscal year 2006, the Company charged $0.5 million of restructuring costs against earnings. The 

restructuring charges primarily related to additional professional fees incurred in connection with the 

restructuring activities, restructuring incentives and costs incurred to shut down a fabrication facility. 

Payments of approximately $1.8 million were made in fiscal 2006 and primarily relate to employee 

severance and consulting fees. 

During fiscal year 2005, the Company charged $3.7 million of restructuring related costs against earnings. 

These restructuring charges included employee severance and benefit costs of $1.5 million, $1.6 million 

of professional fees and $0.6 million of other restructuring costs, primarily related to environmental 

remediation associated with a business previously disposed. The employee severance and benefit costs 

related to the termination of approximately 60 employees. Payments of approximately $2.1 million were 

made and relate primarily to employee severance and consulting fees. 

Restructuring charges related to specific operating activities are reflected in the applicable segment in 

Note 15. “Other” restructuring charges are allocated based on percentage of revenue. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-73- 

Note 15. Segment Information

The Company has two reportable segments, the Construction Services segment and the Repair and 

Maintenance Services segment. 

Our Construction Services segment provides turnkey and specialty construction to many industries. These 

services including civil/structural, mechanical, piping, electrical and instrumentation, millwrighting, and 

fabrication are provided for projects of varying complexities, schedule durations, and budgets. Our project 

experience includes renovations, retrofits, modifications and expansions to existing facilities as well as 

grassroots construction of new facilities. We specialize in aboveground storage tanks for the bulk 

storage/terminal industry, capital construction for the downstream petroleum industry, specialty construction, 

and electrical and instrumentation services for various industries. 

Our Repair and Maintenance Services segment provides a wide range of routine, preventative and 

emergency repair and maintenance services, outage and turnaround services, including plant 

maintenance, electrical and instrumentation maintenance, tank inspection, repair and maintenance, 

industrial cleaning and ASME code repairs. Our primary services include aboveground storage tank repair 

and maintenance, turnarounds and maintenance for the downstream petroleum industry, specialty repair 

and maintenance services and electrical and instrumentation repair and maintenance. 

Other consists of operating activity related to previously disposed of businesses and certain corporate 

assets. 

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on profit or loss from operations 

before income taxes. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those 

described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Intersegment sales and transfers are 

recorded at cost; therefore, there is no intercompany profit or loss recognized. 

Segment assets consist of accounts receivable, costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on 

uncompleted contracts, property, plant and equipment and goodwill. 

Restructuring charges are reflected in the applicable segment. “Other” restructuring, impairment and 

abandonment charges are allocated to the Construction Services and Repair and Maintenance Services 

segments based on percentage of revenue. 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-74- 

Annual Results of Operations 

(In thousands) 

 

Construction 

Services 

 Repair & 

Maintenance 

Services 

 

Other 

 

Combined 

Total 

Fiscal Year 2007 

 

Gross revenues $ 376,849 $ 277,556 $ - $ 654,405 

Less: inter-segment revenues 10,689 3,870 - 14,559 

Consolidated revenues 366,160 273,686 - 639,846 

Gross profit 29,494 36,392 - 65,886 

Operating income (loss) 11,567 21,556 (73) 33,050 

Income (loss) before income tax 

expense 

 

 10,394 

 

 20,793 

 

 (73) 

 

 31,114 

Net income (loss) 6,498 12,718 (45) 19,171 

Segment assets 136,780 98,737 7,392 242,909 

Capital expenditures 6,850 4,319 1,951 13,120 

Depreciation and amortization expense 3,586 2,914 - 6,500 

Fiscal Year 2006 

Gross revenues $ 254,382 $ 250,832 $ - $ 505,214 

Less: inter-segment revenues 10,657 630 - 11,287 

Consolidated revenues 243,725 250,202 - 493,927 

Gross profit 20,392 26,687 - 47,079 

Operating income (loss) 6,561 11,237 (100) 17,698 

Income (loss) before income tax 

expense 

 

 2,536 

 

 9,158 

 

 (100) 

 

 11,594 

Net income (loss) 2,168 5,547 (62) 7,653 

Segment assets 91,079 69,981 27,216 188,276 

Capital expenditures 3,945 383 1,286 5,614 

Depreciation and amortization expense 2,796 2,902 - 5,698 

 

Fiscal Year 2005 

 

Gross revenues $ 215,997 $ 236,059 $ - $ 452,056 

Less: inter-segment revenues 12,047 871 - 12,918 

Consolidated revenues 203,950 235,188 - 439,138 

Gross profit 12,178 18,841 - 31,019 

Operating income (loss) (40,786) 2,005 (357) (39,138)

Income (loss) before income tax 

expense 

 

 (44,052) 

 

 (49) 

 

 (357) 

 

 (44,458)

Net income (loss) (38,590) (19) (221) (38,830)

Segment assets 92,877 84,215 25,288 202,380 

Capital expenditures 251 239 940 1,430 

Depreciation and amortization expense 3,470 3,256 - 6,726 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-75- 

Geographical information is as follows: 

Revenues 

Fiscal Year 2007 Fiscal Year 2006 Fiscal Year 2005 

 (In thousands) 

Domestic $ 624,002 $ 478,154 $ 433,547 

International 15,844 15,773 5,591 

$ 639,846 $ 493,927 $ 439,138 

Long-Lived Assets 

May 31, 2007 May 31, 2006 May 31, 2005 

 (In thousands) 

Domestic $ 66,473 $ 59,134 $ 61,778 

International 3,379 3,341 3,023 

$ 69,852 $ 62,475 $ 64,801 

Segment revenue from external customers by market is as follows: 

 

Construction 

Services 

 Repair & 

Maintenance 

Services 

 

Consolidated 

Total 

(In thousands) 

Fiscal Year 2007 

 

Aboveground Storage Tanks $ 159,274 $ 125,236 $ 284,510 

Downstream Petroleum 120,828 120,557 241,385 

Electrical and Instrumentation 32,439 27,893 60,332 

Specialty 53,619 - 53,619 

Total $ 366,160 $ 273,686 $ 639,846 

 

Fiscal Year 2006 

 

Aboveground Storage Tanks $ 88,368 $ 97,157 $ 185,525 

Downstream Petroleum 95,789 139,371 235,160 

Electrical and Instrumentation 22,517 13,674 36,191 

Specialty 37,051 - 37,051 

Total $ 243,725 $ 250,202 $ 493,927 

 

Fiscal Year 2005 

 

Aboveground Storage Tanks $ 78,123 $ 81,798 $ 159,921 

Downstream Petroleum 62,977 138,555 201,532 

Electrical and Instrumentation 56,839 14,835 71,674 

Specialty 6,011 - 6,011 

Total $ 203,950 $ 235,188 $ 439,138 
Matrix Service Company 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued) 

-76- 

Information about Significant Customers 

In fiscal 2007, one customer accounted for 14% of our consolidated revenues and 23% of our Construction 

Services revenues. Two additional customers accounted for 12% and 13% of our Construction Services 

revenues. Three other customers represented 20%, 13% and 11% of our Repair and Maintenance 

Services revenues, respectively. 

One customer accounted for approximately 14% of the Company’s consolidated revenues and 

approximately 27% of Repair and Maintenance Services revenues for the year ended May 31, 2006. One 

customer represented 13% of Construction Services revenues and another customer represented 13% of 

Repair and Maintenance Services revenues. 

Two customers accounted for approximately 11% and 10%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated 

revenues for the year ended May 31, 2005. The customer that represented 11% of consolidated revenues 

accounted for 8% of Construction Services and 14% of Repair and Maintenance Services revenues. The 

customer that represented 10% of consolidated revenues accounted for 4% of Constructions Services and 

15% of Repair and Maintenance Services revenue. 
-77- 

Matrix Service Company 

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) 

Fiscal Years Ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 

 

First 

Quarter 

 

Second 

Quarter 

 

Third 

Quarter 

 

Fourth 

Quarter 

Fiscal Year 2007 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 

 

Revenues $ 126,859 $ 166,366 $ 168,700 $ 177,921 

Gross profit 13,307 21,902 18,924 11,753 

Net income 3,008 8,074 6,150 1,939 

Net income per common share: 

 Basic 0.14 0.35 0.27 0.08 

 Diluted 0.12 0.31 0.24 0.08 

Fiscal Year 2006 

Revenues $ 108,996 $ 126,778 $ 119,575 $ 138,578 

Gross profit 10,183 12,959 11,665 12,272 

Net income 375 2,168 1,771 3,339 

Net income per common share: 

 Basic 0.02 0.11 0.09 0.16 

 Diluted 0.02 0.10 0.08 0.14 

The sum of earnings per share for the four quarters may not equal the total earnings per share for the year due to 

changes in the average number of common shares outstanding and rounding. 
-78- 

 Matrix Service Company 

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts 

May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 

(In thousands) 

COL A. 

 

COL. B 

 COL. C 

ADDITIONS 

 

COL. D 

 

COL E. 

Description 

 

Balance at 

Beginning of 

Period 

 

Charged to 

Costs and 

Expenses 

 Charged to 

Other 

Accounts – 

Describe 

 

Deductions 

– Describe 

 

Balance at 

End of 

Period 

Fiscal Year 2007 

Deducted from asset accounts: 

 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 190 $ 189 $ - $ (119) (A) $ 260 

 Contract disputes reserve 5,390 - - (5,390) (A) - 

 Valuation reserve for deferred 

 tax assets 3,431 - - 

 

 (1,282) (B) 2,149 

Total $ 9,011 $ 189 $ - $ (6,791) $ 2,409 

Fiscal Year 2006 

Deducted from asset accounts: 

 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 461 $ 587 $ - $ (858) (A) $ 190 

 Contract disputes reserve 10,333 - - (4,943) (A) 5,390 

 Valuation reserve for deferred 

 tax assets 

 

 5,139 

 

 - 

 

 - 

 

 (1,708) (C)

 

 3,431 

Total $ 15,933 $ 587 $ - $ (7,509) $ 9,011 

 

Fiscal Year 2005 

Deducted from asset accounts: 

 Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 337 $ 562 $ - $ (438) (A) $ 461 

 Contract disputes reserve - 10,333 - - 10,333 

 Valuation reserve for deferred 

 tax assets 

 

 2,619 

 

 2,520 

 

 - 

 

 - 

 

 5,139 

Total $ 2,956 $ 13,415 $ - $ (438) $ 15,933 

(A) Receivables written off against allowance for doubtful accounts and contract dispute reserve. 

(B) Certain operating loss carryforwards previously reserved were utilized or deemed utilizable resulting in a reduction in the

valuation reserve of $921. The recognition of the operating loss carryforward resulted in a $157 charge to goodwill and a $764

reduction of the fiscal 2007 tax provision. The remaining reduction was due to certain miscellaneous adjustments. 

(C) Represents recognition of operating losses and tax credits previously reserved. Of the reversal, $202 was charged to goodwill, 

$1,401 reduced the current year tax provision and $105 related to rate adjustments. 
-79- 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 

None 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures 

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to 

be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported 

within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated 

and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, 

as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of 

“disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure 

controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter 

how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control 

objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit 

relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. We carried out an evaluation, under the 

supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our 

Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and 

procedures as of May 31, 2007. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial 

Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance 

level at May 31, 2007. 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 

See “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting” set forth in Item 8, Financial 

Statements and Supplementary Data. 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting 

There have been no changes during the fourth quarter that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to 

materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

Item 9B. Other Information 

None 

PART III 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 

Information regarding our directors and executive officers and information required by Items 401, 405, 

407(c)(3), 407(d)(4) and 407 (d)(5) of Regulation S-K is incorporated herein by reference from the 

Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 

within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates. 

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all directors, officers 

and employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting 

officer of the Company. In addition, we have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines for the Board of 

Directors and Charters for the Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance 

Committees of the Board of Directors. The current version of these corporate governance documents is 

publicly available in the “Investors” section of the Company’s website at www.matrixservice.com under 

“Corporate Governance.” If we make any substantive amendments to the Code of Business Conduct and 

Ethics, or grant any waivers, including implicit waivers, from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics 

applicable to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer, or any 

person performing similar functions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website or in a 

report on Form 8-K. 
-80- 

Item 11. Executive Compensation 

Information regarding executive compensation and transactions and compensation committee interlocks 

and insider participation is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy 

statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end 

of the fiscal year to which this report relates. 

 

The Compensation Committee Report is also incorporated herein by reference from our proxy statement, 

however it is deemed to be “furnished” and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 

18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that 

section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, 

except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related 

Stockholder Matters 

Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related 

stockholder matters is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, 

which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the 

fiscal year to which this report relates. 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence 

Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence is 

incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with 

the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this 

report relates. 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 

Information regarding principal accountant fees and services is incorporated herein by reference from the 

Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 

within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates. 
-81- 

PART IV 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 

Financial Statements of the Company 

The following financial statements and supplementary data are filed as a part of this report under “Item 8 

– Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”: 

Financial Statements of the Company 

 

 Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting...................................... 42 

 Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Deloitte & Touche LLP)............... 43 

 

 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)..................... 46 

 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 31, 2007 and 2006............................................... 47 

 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended 

 May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005..................................................................................... 49 

 

 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity 

 for the years ended May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.......................................................... 50 

 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended 

 May 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005..................................................................................... 51 

 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................................................................... 53 

Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)................................................................................... 77 

Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts....................................................................78 

Financial Statement Schedules 

The following financial statement schedule is filed as a part of this report under “Schedule II” immediately 

following Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited): Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the 

three fiscal years ended May 31, 2007. All other schedules called for by Form 10-K are omitted because 

they are inapplicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements, or notes thereto, 

included herein. 
-82- 

Index to Exhibits 

 3.1 Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 

(File No. 333-117077) filed July 1, 2004 (the “S-3 Registration Statement”) is hereby incorporated by 

reference). 

 3.2 Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated October 31, 2000 (Exhibit 3.3 to 

the S-3 Registration Statement is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 3.3 Form of Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Appendix A to the 

Company’s Proxy Statement filed on September 15, 2006 (File No. 1-15461) is hereby incorporated by 

reference). 

 3.4 Certification of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series B Junior Preferred Stock dated 

November 12, 1999 (Exhibit 3.2 to the S-3 Registration Statement is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 3.5 Bylaws, as amended (Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-

36081), filed July 26,1990, is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 3.6 Certificate of Increase of Authorized Number of Shares of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock 

pursuant to Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware dated May 1, 2005 

(Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-15461), filed August 17, 2005, is 

hereby incorporated by reference). 

* 3.7 Certificate of Increase of Authorized Number of Shares of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock 

pursuant to Section 151 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware dated October 23, 

2006. 

 4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 

(File No. 33-36081), filed July 26, 1990, is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 4.2 Securities Purchase Agreement dated April 22, 2005, including form of Note (Exhibit 10.1 to the 

Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed April 25, 2005, is hereby incorporated 

by reference). 

+ 10.1 Matrix Service 1990 Incentive Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Registration 

Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-56945), as amended, filed June 12, 1990, is hereby incorporated 

by reference). 

+ 10.2 Matrix Service 1991 Incentive Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement 

on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36081), filed July 26, 1990, is hereby incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.3 Matrix Service 1995 Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s 

Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-2771), filed April 24,1996, is hereby incorporated by 

reference). 

+ 10.4 Matrix Service 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed on 

September 15, 2006 (File No. 1-15461), is hereby incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.5 Amendment No. 1 to Matrix Service Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10 to Amended 

Schedule 14A filed on October 4, 2006 (File No. 1-15461) is hereby incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.6 Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for non-employee directors (2004 Stock Plan) (Exhibit 10.3 

to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed October 27, 2006 is hereby 

incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.7 Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for employees (2004 Stock Plan) (Exhibit 10.4 to the 

Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed October 27, 2006 is hereby 

incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.8 Matrix Service Company Deferred Compensation Plan for members of the Board of Directors effective 

December 31, 2006 (Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed 

October 27, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference). 
-83- 

+ 10.9 Form of Severance Agreement (Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-

15461), filed on October 27, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.10 Form of Management Retention Agreement (Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K 

(File No. 1-15461), filed October 27, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.11 Amendment to Award Agreements by and between Matrix Service Company and Hugh E. Bradley 

dated as of October 23, 2006 (Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-

15461), filed October 27, 2006 is hereby incorporate by reference). 

+ 10.12 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (2004 Stock Plan) (Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s annual 

report on Form 10-K (File No, 1-15461) filed August 4, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.13 Form of Stock Option Award Agreement (1995 Directors Plan) (Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s annual 

report on Form 10-K (File No, 1-15461) filed August 4, 2006 is hereby incorporated by reference). 

+ 10.14 Amendment No. 1 to the Matrix Service 1995 Nonemployee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Exhibit B to 

the Company’s 2005 Proxy Statement filed on September 16, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference 

herein). 

 10.15 Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Agreement and Conversion to Asset Purchase Agreement, 

dated August 31, 1999, by and among Matrix Service and Caldwell Tanks, Inc. (Exhibit 99.1 to the 

Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-18716), filed September 13, 1999, is hereby 

incorporated by reference). 

 10.16 Rights Agreement (including a form of Certificate of Designation of Series B Junior Participating 

Preferred Stock as Exhibit A thereto, a form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B thereto and a summary of 

Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C thereto) dated November 2, 1999, (Exhibit 1 to the 

Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-18716), filed November 9, 1999, is hereby 

incorporated by reference). 

 10.17 Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement effective April 21, 2005 (Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s current 

report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed April 25, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 10.18 Equity Interests Purchase Agreement dated as of March 7, 2003 by and among Hake Acquisition Corp., 

Matrix Service Company, and the Holders of the Equity Interests of The Hake Group of Companies 

(Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed March 24, 2003, is 

hereby incorporated by reference). 

10.19 Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of November 30, 2006, among the 

Company, as Borrower, the Lenders party thereto, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative 

Agent and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. as Sole Bookrunner and Sole Lead Arranger (filed as Exhibit 10 

to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed on December 6, 2006, is hereby 

incorporated by reference). 

10.20 First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 6, 2007 (Exhibit 

10 to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed July 11, 2007 is hereby 

incorporated by reference). 

 

 10.21 Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 3, 2005 (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report 

on Form 8-K filed (File No. 1-15461), filed on October 4, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 10.22 Registration Rights Agreement dated October 3, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report 

on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed on October 4, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 10.23 Amendment No. 2 to Rights Agreement effective as of October 3, 2005 (Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s 

Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 1-15461), filed on October 4, 2005, is hereby incorporated by 

reference). 

 10.24 Side Letter dated October 3, 2005 (Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 

1-15461) filed on October 4, 2005, is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 

 10.25 Subordination Agreement dated as of April 22, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on 

Form 8-K dated April 25, 2005 (File No. 1-15461), is hereby incorporated by reference). 
-84- 

 10.26 Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 22, 2005 (Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current 

Report on Form 8-K dated April 25, 2005 (File No. 1-15461), is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 

+ 10.27 Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael J. Hall dated April 25, 2005 (Exhibit 10.2 to 

the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated April 26, 2005 (File No. 1-15461), is hereby 

incorporated by reference). 

 

 10.28 Lump Sum Turnkey Agreement dated May 6, 2005 among the Company, Diamond LNG LLC and 

Bechtel Corporation (Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 1-15461) 

filed August 17, 2005 is hereby incorporated by reference). 

 * 21 Subsidiaries. 

 * 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Pubic Accounting Firm – Deloitte & Touche LLP. 

 * 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Pubic Accounting Firm – Ernst & Young LLP. 

 * 31.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – CEO. 

 * 31.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 – CFO. 

 * 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) – CEO. 

 

 * 32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) – CFO. 

 * Filed herewith. 

 + Management Contract or Compensatory Plan. 
-85- 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Matrix 

Service Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto 

duly authorized. 

 Matrix Service Company 

Date: August 14, 2007 

 ______________________________________ 

 Michael J. Bradley, President 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below 

by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. 

Signatures Title Date 

_________________________ 

Michael J. Bradley 

 Michael J. Bradley 

President, Chief Executive Officer 

and Director 

(Principal Executive Officer) 

 

August 14, 2007 

_________________________ 

George L. Austin 

 

George L. Austin 

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial and 

Accounting Officer) 

 

August 14, 2007 

______________________ 

Michael J. Hall 

 

Chairman of the Board of 

Directors 

 

August 14, 2007 

___________________________ 

I. Edgar Hendrix 

 

Director 

 

August 14, 2007 

_________________________ 

Paul K. Lackey 

 

Director 

 

August 14, 2007 

_________________________ 

Tom E. Maxwell 

 

Director 

 

August 14, 2007 

______________________ 

David E. Tippeconnic 

 

Director 

 

August 14, 2007 
EXHIBIT 31.1 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael J. Bradley, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Matrix Service Company; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state 

a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such 

statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, 

fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the 

registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure 

controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d – 15(e)) and internal control 

over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15f)) for the registrant and 

have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and 

procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the 

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those 

entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over 

financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance 

regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external 

purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in 

this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of 

the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 

occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in 

the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, 

the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of 

internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s 

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control 

over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to 

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a 

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2007 

Michael J. Bradley

President and Chief Executive Officer 
EXHIBIT 31.2 

CERTIFICATIONS

I, George L. Austin, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Matrix Service Company; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state 

a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such 

statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, 

fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the 

registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure 

controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d – 15(e)) and internal control 

over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a – 15(f) and 15d – 15f)) for the registrant and 

have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and 

procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the 

registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those 

entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over 

financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance 

regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external 

purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in 

this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of 

the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that 

occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in 

the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, 

the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of 

internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s 

board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control 

over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to 

record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a 

significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2007 

George L. Austin 

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 
EXHIBIT 32.1 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, 

As Adopted Pursuant 

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Matrix Service Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the 

period ending May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof 

(the “Report”), I, Michael J. Bradley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that 

based on my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial 

condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: August 14, 2007 

Michael J. Bradley 

President and Chief Executive Officer 

EXHIBIT 32.2 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, 

As Adopted Pursuant 

Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Matrix Service Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the 

period ending May 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof 

(the “Report”), I, George L. Austin, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, 

certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, 

that based on my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial 

condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: August 14, 2007 

George L. Austin 

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer 
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS MATRIX SERVICE COMPANY

1. Michael J. Bradley President & Chief Executive Officer2. George L. Austin Vice President & Chief Financial Officer3. Philip C. Chappelle Vice President, Risk Management4. Nancy E. Downs Vice President, Human Resources5. John S. Newmeister Vice President, Marketing & Business Development EXECUTIVE OFFICERS MATRIX SERVICE INC.6. James P. Ryan President7. Bradley J. Rinehart Vice PresidentEXECUTIVE OFFICERS MATRIX SERVICE INDUSTRIAL CONTRACTORS, INC.8. James A. Bogan President9. Vance R. Davis Vice President10. Albert D. Fosbenner Vice PresidentBOARD OF DIRECTORS11. Michael J. Hall Chairman of the Board of Matrix Service Company1. Michael J. Bradley President & Chief Executive Officer of Matrix Service Company12. I. Edgar Hendrix Chairman & CEO of Red River Energy, Inc.13. Paul K. Lackey Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of The NORDAM Group14. Tom E. Maxwell President & Chief Executive Officer of The Flintco Companies, Inc.15. David J.Tippeconnic Chief Executive Officer of Arrow-Magnolia International L.P.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

6. 7. 8. 9. 10.

COR1070Tulsa, Ph: 9Fx: 91WebsINDACCDeloitTwo W6120 Suite Tulsa, STOCompCantoINVETruc NThe G22 CoNew YSTO
DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYAL

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

ABLE ETHICAL EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RE

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

Y ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUST

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE E

ILITY DEDICATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY CONSCIENTIOUS INTEG

DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYAL

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

L EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE C

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

Y ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUST

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSCIENTIOUS EXCELLENCE

ILITY DEDICATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY SAFETY QUALITY INTEG

DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY CONSCIENTIOUS ET

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

L EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE C

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

ABLE LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPEND

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE E

ILITY DEDICATION RELIABILITY COMMITMENT INTEGRITY SAFETY QUALITY INTEG

DABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXC

WORTHY RESPONSIBLE CONSCIENTIOUS DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE CONSCIENTIOUS

QUALITY INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYAL

ENTIOUS RESPONSIBLE TRUSTWORTHY DEPENDABLE REPUTABLE RESPECT EXCEL

L EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUSTWORTHY RESPONSIBLE C

Y INTEGRITY RELIABILITY COMMITMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHI

Y ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE RESPECT REPUTABLE DEPENDABLE TRUST

TMENT CREDIBILITY DEDICATION LOYALTY ETHICAL CONSISTENCY EXCELLENCE E