alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Numbers 333-148163 and
333-132607 on Form S-8 of NaturalNano, Inc. of our report, dated April 15,
2009, on consolidated
financial statements as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2008,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NaturalNano, Inc. for the for
the year ended December 31, 2008.  Our report dated April 15, 2009
relating to the consolidated financial statements includes an emphasis paragraph
relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.




/s/
Freed, Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, PC





Buffalo,
NY


April 15,
2009
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 2 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk September 2 , 2020

160827 (35)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 160827

v COA: 349268

Mecosta CC: 08

- 006437

- FC

JONATHAN JOSEPH GOOD

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motions of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing his reply and to exceed the page limitation are GRANTED. The reply shall not

exceed 25 pages and will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before October 7,

2020.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Revision of Information 
Collection: Forms RI 20-64 and RI 20-64A

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management intends to submit to the Office of Management and 
Budget a request for revision of the following information collection. 
RI 20-64, Former Spouse Survivor Annuity Election, is used by the Civil 
Service Retirement System to provide information about the amount of 
annuity payable after a survivor reduction and obtain a survivor 
benefits election form from annuitants who are eligible to elect to 
provide survivor benefits for a former spouse. RI 20-64A, Information 
On Electing A Survivor Annuity For Your Former Spouse, is a pamphlet 
that provides important information to retirees under the Civil Service 
Retirement System who want to provide a survivor annuity for a former 
spouse.
    Approximately 30 RI 20-64 forms are completed annually. Each form 
takes about 45 minutes to complete. The annual estimated burden is 23 
hours. Comments are particularly invited on:

--whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and 
whether it will have practical utility;
--whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of 
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; and
--ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, through the use of appropriate 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe9493989f8c8c9190be939f9792d0918e93d0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="701a1d161102021f1e301d11191c5e1f001d5e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by March 2, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349, 
Washington, DC 20415-0001.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT:
Mary Beth Smith-Toomey, Budget & Administrative Service Division, (202) 
606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-33881 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-58684, 333-45638, 333-66065, 333-72288 and 333-81430 of Restoration
Hardware, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-62178 of
Restoration Hardware, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated April 23, 2002
(September 13, 2002 as to Note 1), appearing in this Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Restoration Hardware, Inc. for the year ended
February 2, 2002.

Our audit of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Restoration Hardware, Inc.,
listed in Item 14(a)(2). The financial statement schedule is the responsibility
of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
based on our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
September 13, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3627]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[CGD 97-009]


Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee (MERPAC) will 
meet to discuss various issues relating to and concerning merchant 
marine personnel, including safety, training, and qualifications. The 
meetings are open to the public.

DATES: A working group meeting will be held on Thursday, March 13, 
1997, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. A public meeting will be held on Friday, 
March 14, 1997 from 8 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Written material and requests 
to make oral presentations should reach the Coast Guard on or before 
February 28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Both meetings will be held at the RTM Center for Advanced 
Maritime Officers Training (STAR Center), 2 West Dixie Highway, Dania, 
FL 33004. Written material and requests to make oral presentations 
should be sent to Commander Greg Jones, Commandant (G-MSO-1), U.S. 
Coast Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second Street SW., Washington, DC 20593-
0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Commander Greg Jones, Executive Director of MERPAC, or Mr. Mark Gould, 
Assistant to the Executive Director, telephone (202) 267-0229, fax 
(202) 267-4570.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2.

Agenda of March 14, 1997 Meeting

(1) Subcommittee Reports
    a. International Convention on the Standards of Training, 
Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW).
    b. Prevention Through People (PTP).
    c. Marine Simulation.
(2) Other issues to be discussed
    a. MERPAC website on the Coast Guard home page.
    b. Tankerman regulations--REC enforcement.
    c. NMC outcomes assessment.

Procedural

    Both meetings are open to the public. With advance notice, and at 
the discretion of the Chairman, members of the public may present oral 
statements at the March 14, 1997 meeting. Persons wishing to make oral 
statements on March 14, 1997 should notify the Executive Director no 
later than February 28, 1997. Written statements or materials may be 
submitted for presentation to the Committee at any time; however, to 
ensure timely distribution to each Committee member, 20 copies of the 
written materials should be submitted to the Executive Director at the 
address above no later than February 28, 1997.

Information on Services for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on facilities or services for individuals with 
disabilities or to request assistance at the meetings, contact the 
Executive Director as soon as possible.

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
Joseph J. Angelo,
Director of Standards, Marine Safety and Environmental Protection.
[FR Doc. 97-3627 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50653 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,** Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Lucas Victorino**

**- Tista,**  Defendant

— Appellant **,**

**consolidated with**

**_____________ No. 21** 

**- 50671** 

**_____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Lucas Vidorino Tista**

**- Sis,**  Defendant

— Appellant

**.** United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 6, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50653 Document: 00516156774 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/06/2022No. 21

- 50653 c/w No. 21

- 50671

2 Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 199

- 1 USDC No. 4:2 1

- CR

- 61

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Lucas Victorino

- Tista appeals his conviction and sentence for entry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)( 1 ), along with the revocation of the term of supervised release he was serving at the time of the offense. Because his appellate brief does not address the v alidity of the revocation or the revocation sentence, he abandons any challenge to that judgment. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224

- 25 (5th Cir. 1993). For the first time on appeal, Victorino

- Tista contends that it violates the Constitution to treat a prior conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a sentencing factor, rather than as an element of the offense. He correctly concedes that the argument is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), bu t he wishes to preserve it for further review. The Government has moved without opposition for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file its brief.
As the Government asserts and as Victorino

- Tista concedes, the sole issue rais ed on appeal is foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres

. See United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda

Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625

- 26 (5th Cir. 2007). Because the Government ’ s position “ is clearly right as a matter of law so that there can be no substantial

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that th is opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. Case: 21-50653 Document: 00516156774 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/06/2022No. 21

- 50653 c/w No. 21

- 50671

3 question as to the outcome of the case, ” Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), summary affirmance is proper. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is **GRANTED** , and the judgment of the district court is **AFFIRMED** . The Government ’ s alternative motion for an extension of time is **DENIED**

. Case: 21-50653 Document: 00516156774 Page: 3 Date Filed: 01/06/2022
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the matter of the Estate of * From the County Court at

Mary Francine Wren Burkhaulter, Law No. 2 of Ector County,

deceased, Trial Court No. 20,508-11.

No. 11-14-00162-CV * August 21, 2014

 * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered Travis Burkhaulter’s and Kathy Wren’s agreed 

motion to dismiss the appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. 

Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The 

costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.
**Exhibit  23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-58684,333-45638, 333-66065, 333-72288, 333-81430, 333-103639,333-115076 and 333-132532 of Restoration Hardware Inc. andsubsidiaries on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-70624on Form S-3 of our report dated April 11, 2006 relating to theConsolidated Financial Statements of Restoration Hardware, Inc. andsubsidiaries and managements’ report on internal control over financialreporting, appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K ofRestoration Hardware Inc. and subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended January 28,2006.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPSan Francisco, CaliforniaApril 11, 2006

----
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00036-CR

DOYLE DWAYNE SHIFFLETT APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 90TH DISTRICT COURT OF YOUNG COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We abated this cause on September 20, 2011 so that trial counsel, Hon. 

Mark H. Barber, could show cause why he should not be held in contempt of 

court for failing to complete and file appellant’s brief as ordered. At the hearing

held September 30, 2011, Barber testified that he had been “hit with four different 

appeals at the same time”; that “along with [his] practice, [he] just got behind”; 

and that he had “lost his staff” on August 29, 2011, and had “been in disarray 

since then.” Barber also testified that he was “just about done on” Appellant’s 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

brief, that he just needed to “edit it one more time,” and that he had planned to 

file it that day.

But Appellant testified at the hearing that he no longer wishes to pursue 

this appeal, and he filed “Appellant=s Motion To Dismiss Appeal” below.

Although filed in the trial court instead of this court, that motion otherwise 

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this 

motion, we decline to exercise our contempt powers, grant Appellant’s motion to 

dismiss, and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 20, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3805]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for 
public comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad 
Retirement Board (RRB) will publish periodic summaries of proposed data 
collections.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information has practical utility; 
(b) the accuracy of the RRB's estimate of the burden of the collection 
of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize 
the burden related to the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Title and purpose of information collection: Survivor 
Questionnaire; OMB 3220-0032. Under Section 6 of the Railroad 
Retirement Act (RRA), benefits that may be due on the death of a 
railroad employee or a survivor annuitant include (1) a lump-sum death 
benefit (2) a residual lump-sum payment (3) accrued annuities due but 
unpaid at death, and (4) monthly survivor insurance payments. The 
requirements for determining the entitlement of possible beneficiaries 
to these benefits are prescribed in 20 CFR part 234.
    When the RRB receives notification of the death of a railroad 
employee or survivor annuitant, an RRB field office utilizes Form RL-
94-F, Survivor Questionnaire, to secure additional information from 
surviving relatives needed to determine if any further benefits are 
payable under the RRA. Completion is voluntary. One response is 
requested of each respondent.
    The RRB proposes minor changes to Form RL-94-F to incorporate 
language required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and to request 
the address of the person who either paid or will pay the deceased 
annuitant's burial expenses. Currently, the RRB requests only their 
name and phone number. The completion time for the RL-94-F is estimated 
at between 5 to 11 minutes. The RRB estimates that approximately 26,500 
responses are received annually.
    Additional Information or Comments: To request more information or 
to obtain a copy of the information collection justification, forms, 
and/or supporting material, please call the RRB Clearance Officer at 
(312) 751-3363. Comments regarding the information collection should be 
addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North 
Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092. Written comments should be 
received within 60 days of this notice.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3805 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
257 La. 612

#### L. C. RICKS v. ASSOCIATED INDEMNITY CORPORATION.

No. 51124.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 4, 1971.

In re: Associated Indemnity Corporation applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 242 So.2d 346.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,549
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,725
<PP&E>                                          14,710
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,607
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,500
<SALES>                                         21,593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,593
<CGS>                                           15,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,219
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,393)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,713)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,680)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.4  POWER OF ATTORNEY OF JOSEPH A. PISCOPO.

                            POWER OF ATTORNEY

    Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and 
appoints each of W. Scott Webber and Thomas Vanneman, signing singly, his/her 
true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

    (1)  execute for and on behalf of the undersigned Forms 3, 4 and 5 and in
    accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
    the rules thereunder;

    (2)  do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned
    which may be necessary or desirable to complete the execution of any such
    Form 3, 4 or 5 and the timely filing of such form with the United States
    Securities and Exchange Commission and any other authority; and

    (3)  take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
    foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit
    to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it
    being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on
    behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in
    such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-
    fact may approve in his/her discretion.

    The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,
necessary and proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers
herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power
of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned
acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity
at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming any of the undersigned's
responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be
executed this 26 day of FEBRUARY, 1997.


                                       /s/
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Signature

                                             JOSEPH A. PISCOPO
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Print Name








                                     44