alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-215-001]


Williston Basin Interstate Pipeline Company; Notice of Compliance 
Tariff Filing

February 11, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 7, 1997, Williston Basin Interstate 
Pipeline Company (Williston Basin), tendered for filing revised tariff 
sheets to Second Revised Volume No. 1 and Original Volume No. 2 of its 
FERC Gas Tariff. The proposed effective date of these tariff sheets is 
February 1, 1997.
    Williston Basin states that this compliance filing is being filed 
pursuant to the Commission's January 29, 1997 Letter Order in the 
above-referenced proceeding which required Williston Basin to remove 
the current level of electric costs included in its base rates 
associated with the operation of its electric compressors.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed in 
accordance with Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection in the Public 
Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3851 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Clifton L. TODD, Appellant, v. Sebie W. TODD, Appellee.

No. 1011.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 20, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Russell O. Morrow, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

1

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 9, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 06-60166

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NASIR ABDUL-ALI also known as, Donald Ray Reed,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

(USDC No. 4:05-CR-45)

__________________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nasir Abdul-Ali appealsthe district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence

discovered pursuant to a search warrant. We affirm.

The parties and the district court, under our decision in United States v. Pigrum, 922
2

F.2d 249, 252 (5th Cir. 1991), focus on whether the officers relied in good faith upon the

search warrant, rather than addressing whether probable cause supported the warrant. This

is a unique situation in which the easier question is whether probable cause supported the

warrant; we hold that it did. Officer Jones, the search warrant affiant, followed Abdul-Ali

fromthe house at 100 February Street, witnessed the controlled sale, and followed Abdul-Ali

back to the general location of the house. These facts supply probable cause to believe that

Abdul-Ali stashed drugs in the house.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM LYNTON GROUP, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                           1,197,385
<SECURITIES>                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                    1,730,700
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                        921,116
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 4,054,348
<PP&E>                          17,761,437
<DEPRECIATION>                   4,256,778 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  23,768,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            6,477,100
<BONDS>                         12,743,913
<COMMON>                         1,918,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                       1,728,989   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    23,768,464
<SALES>                          5,871,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 5,871,591
<CGS>                            4,603,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    5,465,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    19,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 241,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    145,415
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                145,415
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                       145,415
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .02
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Thomas M. STRAMIELLO.

No. 62521.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Thomas M. Stramiello applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order. Parish of Rapides.

Writ denied. No abuse of discretion.

DIXON, J., would grant the writ.
#### Roosevelt VAMPER, Petitioner, v. HILL BROTHERS, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 42742.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
CROMPTON & KNOWLES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share data)

                Quarter Ended         Six  Months Ended
                  June 28,   June 29,   June 28,   June 29,
                    1997       1996       1997       1996

                PRIMARY
Earnings
Earnings before extraordinary
  loss          $  31,768  $  24,376  $  58,379  $  45,530

Extraordinary
  loss             (1,227)      (441)    (1,227)      (441)

Net earnings    $  30,541  $  23,935  $  57,152  $  45,089

Shares
Weighted average shares
 outstanding       73,341     71,564     73,210     71,551

Common stock
 equivalents        2,419        465      2,191        463

Average shares
 outstanding       75,760     72,029     75,401     72,014

Per share
Earnings before extraordinary
  loss          $    0.42  $    0.34  $    0.77  $    0.63

Extraordinary
  loss              (0.02)        -       (0.02)        - 

Net earnings    $    0.40  $    0.34  $    0.75  $    0.63

                FULLY DILUTED
Earnings
Earnings before extraordinary
  loss          $  31,768     24,376  $  58,379  $  45,530

Extraordinary
  loss             (1,227)      (441)    (1,227)      (441)

Net earnings    $  30,541  $  23,935  $  57,152  $  45,089

Shares
Weighted average shares
 outstanding       73,341     71,564     73,210     71,551

Common stock
 equivalents        2,854        602      2,987        591

Average shares
 outstanding       76,195     72,166     76,197     72,142

Per share
Earnings before extraordinary
  loss          $    0.42  $    0.34  $    0.77  $    0.63

Extraordinary
  loss              (0.02)        -       (0.02)        - 

Net earnings    $    0.40  $    0.34  $    0.75  $    0.63
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68278-68279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34114]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-137-000]


ANR Pipeline Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

December 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 16, 1997, ANR Pipeline Company (ANR), 
500 Renaissance Center, Detroit, Michigan 48243, filed in Docket No. 
CP98-137-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 157.205, 157.211) under the Natural 
Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to install and operate a new turbine 
meter at an existing meter station in Branch County, Michigan, under 
ANR's blanket

[[Page 68279]]

certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-480-000, pursuant to Section 7 of 
the NGA, all as more fully set forth in the request that is on file 
with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    ANR proposes to install and operate a 2-inch turbine meter at its 
existing Coldwater Lakes Meter Station in Branch County, Michigan. ANR 
estimates the cost of installing the meter at $19,000. It is stated 
that ANR is installing the meter to accommodate increasing deliveries 
at the meter station. It is explained that ANR delivered 58,212 Mcf of 
natural gas at the Coldwater Lakes Meter Station in the 12-month period 
from July 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996, and 88,713 Mcf in the 12-
month period for the following 12-month period, with most of the 
increase occurring during the winter months.
    It is asserted that the volumes to be delivered will be within the 
certificated entitlements of the customer, Peoples Natural Gas Company 
(Peoples), and that the gas will be transported under ANR's Part 284 
blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP88-532-000. It is further 
asserted that the volume of gas delivered to Peoples will not affect 
ANR's peak day or annual requirements and that deliveries can be made 
without detriment or disadvantage to ANR's other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff my, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34114 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Roy Lee PALMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL BRANCH, U.S. Sentencing Commission, and Diana E. Murphy, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1562.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 2, 2002.

Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The appellees move for reconsideration of this court’s order denying their motion to dismiss Roy Lee Palmer’s appeal or transfer it to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Palmer sued the defendants in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Palmer sought damages and attorney fees, totaling $56,600,000, for alleged violations of the Racketeering, Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. and various other violations, due to his confinement for a firearms offense. The district court dismissed Palmer’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction, determining that his complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The district court held that, to collect damages for confinement, a plaintiff must allege that his conviction has been reversed, expunged, declared invalid, or called into question.

This court is a court of limited jurisdiction. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1295 (granting this court jurisdiction to review, inter alia, a decision of a district court if that court’s jurisdiction arose under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2)). Upon review of the motion for reconsideration, which is more explanatory of the appellees’ positions than the previous two and one-half page motion to dismiss, we agree that this court is without jurisdiction over this appeal and that it should be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Our jurisdiction over appeals from district court actions against the United States government is limited to certain types of actions in which the plain*484tiff seeks less than $10,000 in damages. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2) (this court shall have jurisdiction over an appeal from a district court if the jurisdiction of the district court was based in whole or in part on 28 U.S.C. § 1346); 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2) (the district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction of any civil action or claim against the United States not exceeding $10,000 in amount).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion for reconsideration is granted. This appeal is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361.
#### Clara Bell GALLOWAY, Appellant, v. The HAMMET COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. P-366.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 16, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 105-106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis 
Panel:

    Agenda Purpose: To review and evaluate grant applications.

[[Page 106]]

    Committee Name: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    Date: January 5, 1998.
    Time: 3 p.m.
    Place: Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20857.
    Contact Person: Gloria B. Levin, Parklawn, Room 9C-18, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, Telephone: (301) 443-1340.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Numbers 93.242, 
93.281, 93.282)

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
LaVeen Ponds,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-34150 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The
undersigned, James Wemett, Acting President and Chief Executive Officer, of
NaturalNano, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies, under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and  results  of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Dated:  April
15, 2009
 
 
 /s/ James
Wemett
 James
Wemett
 Acting
President and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3547]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-115-000]


Koch Gateway Pipeline Company; Notice of Technical Conference

February 7, 1997.
    In the Commission's order issued on December 27, 1996,\1\ in the 
above-captioned proceeding, the Commission held that the filing raises 
issues for which a technical conference is to be convened.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 77 FERC para. 61,332 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The conference to address the issues has been scheduled for 
Wednesday, February 19, 1997, at 10:00 a.m. in a room to be designated 
at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
    All interested persons and Staff are permitted to attend.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3547 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Form 10-Q of Dean
Holding Company (the Company) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Barry A. Fromberg, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
| | /s/ BARRY A. FROMBERG             
| |                                   
| | Barry A. Fromberg                 
| | Executive Vice President and Chief
| | Financial Officer                 

Date: August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Dean Holding Company and will be retained by Dean Holding
Company and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      STATEMENT OF SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I,
Harry M. Rimmer, the Senior Vice President of Finance of Escalon Medical Corp.
(the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1.   The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended June 30,
              2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: September 26, 2003                   /s/ Harry M. Rimmer
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Harry M. Rimmer
                                           Senior Vice President - Finance

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Escalon Medical Corp. and will
be retained by Escalon Medical Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      F-32
cc: Eighth Judicial District Court, Dept. 25 

Christopher Carbon Brumfield 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME Count 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A Cep,
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of Compañía de Telecomunicaciones de Chile S.A. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Isabel Margarita Bravo, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2008



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Isabel Margarita Bravo 
|Isabel Margarita Bravo     
|                           
|Principal Financial Officer

---
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

August 10, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Receipt of confidentially submitted documents for Aerialpixels, LLC

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerialpixels, LLC (Docket ID: FAA-2015-3174) confidentially submitted to 

333exemptions@faa.gov the follow documents:

1) Motion Picture & Television Operations Manual

2) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Phantom 2

3) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Phantom 3

4) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Inspire 1

5) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI S900

6) Aircraft Flight Manual - Cinestar 6

7) Aircraft Flight Manual - Cinestar 8

8) Aircraft Flight Manual - AerialPixels FX8 Pro Elite

9) Aircraft Flight Manual - Mini 250

A receipt was obtained on Tue, August 04, 2015.

If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me 

at (561)222-6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________

Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


    All of the entities listed below are wholly owned subsidiaries of K.Swiss
    Inc.

    1.    K.Swiss Pacific Inc., a Massachusetts corporation.

    2.    K.Swiss International Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of
          Bermuda.

    3.    K.Swiss (UK) Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation.

    4.    K.Swiss Amsterdam B.V., a Dutch corporation.

    5.    K.Swiss S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation.

    6.    K.Swiss Retail Services Inc., a California corporation.

    7.    K.Swiss Australia Pty. Ltd., an Australia corporation.

    8.    K.Swiss International Services (BAARN) B.V., a Dutch corporation.

    9.    K.Swiss Direct Inc., a California corporation.

    10.   K.Swiss Sales Corp., a Delaware corporation.