alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION c Office of Hearings Washington, D. C.

The Liberty Foundation, Inc. 

### FAA DOCKET NO. 2012-0477 (EIR 2011-GL-03-0070)

(Civil Penalty Action) Hon. J. 

### E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge

RESPONDENT'S OBJECTIONS TO UNDISPUTED FACTS 

### Pursuantto the Court's Order of April 2, 2014, Respondent herewith objects to the following two Declared Undisputed Facts, asfollows: Finding No. 1 states in part that Respondent "holds an FAA Part 91 aircraft carrier certificate." Respondent objects to this statement because there is no Part 91 "aircraft carrier" or air carrier certificate issued by the FAA. Respondent operated at all times material as a Part91 operation. Finding No. 43 states in part "the main fuel tank of the B-17 was discovered to be leaking, etc." Respondent believes it is more accurate to state "a" main fuel tank or "one of the" main fuel tanks, etc.

STUARTA. GOLDSTEIN, P.A. 7300NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380,MIAMI, FL 33156 

### 1 To [305) 670-1222 Fo [305)400-0685STUARTGOLDLSTEINPA@ATT.NETRespectfully submitted, STUART A. GOLDSTEIN, P. A. 7300 North Kendall Drive, Suite 380 Miami, FL 33156 Tel: (305) 670-1222 Fax: (305) 670-7065 Email: stuartgoldsteinpa@att.net



### '**~**

Stuart

### A. Goldstein Attorney for Respondent

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFYthatthe foregoing has been served on this 17th day of April, 2014, as setforth below: Christopher 

### R. Stevenson, Esq. Office of the Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 

### 0. Box20636 Atlanta, GA 30320 By email and regular U. S. Mail and that an original and one copywas served upon: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S. W. Washington, D. C. 20591 and that a copywas served upon: HonorableJ. E. Sullivan Office of Hearings, M-20 S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S. E. (E11-310) Washington, D. C. 20590

STUARTA. GOLDSTEIN, P.A. 7300NORTH KENDALL DRIVE, SUITE 380,MIAMI, FL 33156 Tc (305) 670-1222 Fe (305) 400-0685STUARTGOLDLSTEINPA@ATT.NET 2By 

### Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

### and regular U. S. Mail

Stuart A. Goldstein

STUARTA. GOLDSTEIN, P.A. 7300NORTH KENDALL DRIVE. SUITE 380,MIAMI, FL 33156 T, (305) 670·1222 p, (305)400·0685STUARTGOLDLSTEINPA@ATT.NET 

### 3
#### Arthur Lee BOLES and Essie Mae Snow Boles, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dwight PYBURN, Clerk of Court, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13459.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Jan. 16, 1978.

Mecom, Scott & Woods by Leroy H. Scott, Jr., Shreveport, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Dwight D. Pyburn, in pro. per.

Before HALL, MARVIN and JONES, JJ.

MARVIN, Judge.

In a mandamus action, the lower court required plaintiffs to post $10,000 security as a prerequisite to ordering the defendant, as Recorder of Mortgages, to cancel the inscription of $10,000 collateral real estate mortgage executed by plaintiffs to the order of Future Holder.

Plaintiffs complain that the lower court erred in imposing an “unreasonable” requirement on plaintiffs because sworn affidavits and testimony clearly showed the mortgage note had been marked paid by the original holder and was thereafter lost or misplaced and that in the event the note did fall into the hands of another holder, such a holder would not be a holder in due course because his holding would have arisen after the date of execution of the note.

Under similar circumstances, the inscription of a collateral mortgage was ordered canceled without requiring security when evidence was presented to show the note had been marked paid and was thereafter lost or misplaced by the nominal payee. A pledgee of the mortgage note, however, succeeded in having the mortgage declared valid and enforceable against a defendant *1092who purchased the property after the inscription of the mortgage had been canceled. See *National Acceptance Company of America v. Wallace,*194 So.2d 194 (La. App. 2d Cir. 1967). See also *State v. Hickey,*213 La. 966, 36 So.2d 5 (1948).

In *Hickey, supra,*it was observed that the .Recorder of Mortgages may be liable in damages for his cancellation of a mortgage where the mortgage note is not presented for payment in accordance with L.R.S. 9:5167. The court noted that security need not be demanded where it is shown either that the note has been destroyed or that the note has been lost by the maker after it has been marked paid by the record owner and returned to the maker. Here the lower court did not find that the original holder marked the note paid and returned it to the maker. At best, the evidence shows that the note was lost or misplaced while actually or constructively in the hands of the original holder.

Likewise, where a mortgage note is for a true collateral purpose and is negotiable on its face, the mere return of the note to the maker does not cancel the effect of the inscription of the collateral mortgage or destroy the note’s future negotiability. See *Hammond State Bank & Trust Co. v. Broderick,*179 La. 693, 154 So. 739 (1934); Nathan and Marshall, “The Collateral Mortgage,” 33 La. Law Review 497; *Levy v. Ford,*41 La.Ann. 873, 6 So. 671 (1889).

We find no error in the Recorder of Mortgages demanding, or in the lower court requiring, the plaintiffs to post security as a prerequisite to ordering cancellation of the mortgage inscription under the circumstances presented.

At appellants’ cost, judgment is

AFFIRMED.
#### Arthur A. MORRIS, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. William H. CAMPBELL and Natalie S. Campbell, his wife, Appellees.

No. 72-200.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 29, 1973.

*109Frank X. Gliozzo, Richard H. W. Maloy, Coral Gables, for appellants.

Quarles & Mills, So. Miami, for appel-lees.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant plaintiffs seek review of a final judgment in favor of the appellee defendants on a claim for reformation and/or damages for a mistaken conveyance of more land to appellees than was the intent of the parties.

We have carefully considered the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that there was competent substantial evidence in the record to justify the finding of the trial judge, and that no reversible error has been made to appear. Therefore, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Each of the undersigned, in his or her capacity as an officer of CubicCorporation hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The report of Cubic Corporation (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the“Report”), which accompanies this certification, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof  1934.

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theRegistrant at the end of such quarter and the results of operations of theRegistrant for such quarter.

 

 
|   | /s/ W. J. Zable           |                    | /s/ W.W. Boyle |   |
|--------|---------------------------|-------------------------|----------------|--------|
|   | W. J. Zable               |                    | W. W. Boyle    |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                      |                    |           |   |
|   | Date: August 3, 2004 |                    |           |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. Once the application has been accepted 
for processing, it will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 
1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking 
company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the 
nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC 
Act, including whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company can 
``reasonably be expected to produce benefits to the public, such as 
greater convenience, increased competition, or gains in efficiency, 
that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of 
resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interests, or 
unsound banking practices'' (12 U.S.C. 1843). Any request for a hearing 
must be accompanied by a statement of the reasons a written 
presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identifying 
specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, summarizing the 
evidence that would be presented at a hearing, and indicating how the 
party commenting would be aggrieved by approval of the proposal. Unless 
otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 3, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (John E. Yorke, Senior Vice 
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198:
    1. BOK Financial Corporation, Tulsa, Oklahoma; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of First TexCorp, Inc., Dallas, Texas, and 
thereby indirectly acquire First Texas Bank, Dallas, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 2, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-369 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7232 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish Juneteenth Independence 

Day as a Federal holiday, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Ms. JACKSON LEE (for herself, Mrs. FLETCHER, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. VELA, Mr. 

GONZALEZ of Texas, Mr. KHANNA, Mr. KIM, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. 

ALLRED, Mr. GREEN of Texas, Ms. ESCOBAR, Ms. JOHNSON of Texas, 

Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. GARCIA of Texas, Mr. CASTRO of Texas, Mr. 

CICILLINE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mrs. BUSTOS, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. 

MCEACHIN, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. MOORE, 

Ms. FINKENAUER, Ms. WEXTON, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New 

York, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. VAN

DREW, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. STEVENS, Ms. SA ́NCHEZ, Mr. BERA, Mr. 

TRONE, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, 

Ms. PRESSLEY, Mr. TED LIEU of California, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

COOPER, Ms. DEAN, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. NORCROSS, Ms. SCANLON, Mr. 

KENNEDY, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. LOWENTHAL, 

Mr. KILMER, Ms. OMAR, Mrs. LURIA, Mr. EVANS, Mr. SEAN PATRICK

MALONEY of New York, Mr. COHEN, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. SWALWELL of 

California, Ms. BASS, Mrs. MCBATH, Mr. JEFFRIES, Ms. SHERRILL, Ms. 

DAVIDS of Kansas, Ms. SPANBERGER, Miss RICE of New York, Mrs. 

HAYES, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. LEVIN of California, Mr. 

MORELLE, and Mr. SUOZZI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish 

Juneteenth Independence Day as a Federal holiday, and 

for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7232 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Juneteenth National 

5 Independence Day Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. JUNETEENTH INDEPENDENCE DAY. 

7 Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended by inserting after the item relating to Memorial 

9 Day the following: 

10 ‘‘Juneteenth Independence Day.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE AITORNN GENERAL OF TEXAS 

Hamable lL P. 

CauiIty. AUditar 

airdin amtty 

)cormtze, TeCas 

Dear sirt 

_ reoslpt+ 

: 

, 

IselgPer, isuperof bdul funds~, 

ram mats, who 

respeothill~ referred to.Akiole 

1 Code of the State of Texas, 

69s as rollowlY: 

State or any afAi any distrlo$, oountyi elty, proalnat, sohbol dietriot, or other mun~~lpal 

Subdlvislon oi ~thia state, or any oitieer 

or member of any States, distrlot, aounty, 

dity', sahool dietriot or other ?nniolpaI 

board, or judge or any oourt, created by 

or under authority or any general or apeala1 law of 'this State; or zany member of 

the~Lagisl#xl%, aha. appoint, or vote 

for, or-oonfirn the kppointma3t to any 

. 

..- ;

-_. _.. 
Eon. IL P. Jennings., Map 16* 1939, Page 2 

orrioe, position. clerkshlp, employaent or 

auty, 0r any person related within the seoond 

degree by arflnlty or within the third degree 

by aonaangnlnity to the person so appointing 

OT so votfng, or to any other member of any 

such board, the Leglsleture, or aourt bf which 

-mah person so appoint&g or voting may be a 

member, when the salary, fee8, or aompensatlen or. suoh appointee is to be paid far, dlmotly. or lndirsotly, out or or imm publlo 

ruuas or it3433 or office or any kind or o&naotar whatt3oever.* * 

'It has been repeats& held by this Department 

that the above art10143 applies to the employment.@y the 

.oeuaty oeumisaloners or the dounty ooad.rMlone~s* oourt 

ofpersam related to a imunty oo~sdoner within the 

stat64,ds&mes of relatlogship~ 

,9he raat. that the persons eiuployed would be 

‘~ paId fromxi band issuerather than qurreat funds of t&e 

Wuaty would mke na-aiitsreaae, as,~manles ratied .fram 

a band. Lssus w ,vblio .%uzulsy rithln ths aanteaplation 

Of the edxxtea. 

. 

IOU da not state~the rslationshbp between the.. 

oottaty oamulsaioner and the persons ptOposed to be emPlarW W hh Bar your lnformatlon, we are enolasing 

a oopy of'an oplnlon'written by Honorable Soott Gqines, 

a former Assistant Attorney General, which very ably sets 

out the rules~ror deteqnlnlng the degrees or relationship. 

. . 

Yours very truly 

~GXQXALOFTBXAS.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 202 (Thursday, October 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 64108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25805]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, November 30, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, 
an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-25805 Filed 10-16-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-82755, 333-73170, 333-90400, 333-106082 and
333-122021) of Cardiogenesis Corporation of our report dated August 4, 2006,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


                                               /s/ Corbin & Company, LLP
                                               Corbin & Company, LLP

Irvine, California
August 18, 2006
EXHIBIT 11

DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. & SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 1997

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Three Months Ended         Six Months Ended
                                         February 1, 1997          February 1, 1997
                                      -----------------------   -----------------------
                                                     Fully                     Fully
                                        Primary     Diluted      Primary      Diluted
                                      ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                   <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>       
Net income                            $1,119,848   $1,119,848   $2,108,302   $2,108,302
                                      ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
Reconciliation of weighted
average number of shares
outstanding to amount used
in earnings per share computation:

Weighted average number of
      shares outstanding               7,499,879    7,499,879    7,446,246    7,446,246

Add - shares issuable from assumed
      exercise of options under the
      Treasury Stock method            1,083,638    1,120,813    1,077,176    1,114,901
                                      ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
Weighted average number of shares
      outstanding as adjusted          8,583,517    8,620,692    8,523,422    8,561,147
                                      ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
Net income per common share           $     0.13   $     0.13   $     0.25   $     0.25
                                      ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>

The Company  utilized the Treasury  Stock  method for  computing  net income per
common share.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 20, 2017

Order 

Clerk

September 20, 2017

156066(72)

MICHAEL RAMSEY and GLENN DOWDY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC: 156066

v COA: 329920

Wayne CC: 10-004708-CD

LABORERS’ LOCAL 1191, d/b/a

ROAD CONSTRUCTION LABORERS OF

MICHIGAN LOCAL 1191, and MICHAEL

AARON, Defendants-Appellants,

and

BRUCE RUEDISUELI, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellees to extend the time 

for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

submitted on September 15, 2017, is accepted for filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7358

WILLIAM WASHINGTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COLIE L. RUSHTON; HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER,

Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (0:05-cv-02394-GRA)

Submitted: February 5, 2007 Decided: February 12, 2007

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Washington, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Washington has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ruben BIAS.

No. 60224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: Ruben Bias applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. The relator may obtain access to the transcript through his counsel.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion this applicant should be furnished a copy of the transcript, which is' in this Court, until this Court needs it.