alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States


Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): September 5, 2018














DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.


(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)





Ohio000-2449865-0190407(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)(Commission File Number)(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)


325 John H. McConnell Blvd., Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio43215(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)





Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code:   (614) 255-3333








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





 ̈ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





 ̈ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





 ̈ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).


Emerging growth company ☐





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐








---







Item 8.01   Other Events





The following is a summary of assets under management as of August 31, 2018 of Diamond Hill Capital Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. (in millions):





By Investment VehicleProprietary funds$16,192Sub-advised funds1,594Institutional accounts4,856Total$22,642





By Investment StrategySmall Cap$1,489Small-Mid Cap3,502Mid Cap138Large Cap11,560All Cap Select509Long-Short4,298Global/International19Short Duration Fixed Income467Core Fixed Income53Long Duration Fixed Income25Corporate Credit756High Yield54(Less: Investments in affiliated funds)(228)Total$22,642








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.Date:September 5, 2018By:/s/ Thomas E. LineThomas E. Line, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7473-7474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, 
and the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed partial consent decree in United States 
versus The Sherwin-Williams Company, Civil Action No. 93-C-4267, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the Northern District 
of Illinois on February 6, 1997. This proposed consent decree would 
resolve the United States' civil claims against The Sherwin-Williams 
Company under Subchapter III of the Resource Conservation and Recovery 
Act (``RCRA''), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.; the Clean Water 
Act, as amended, 33 U.S.c. 1251 et seq.; the Clean Air Act, as amended, 
42 U.S.C. Secs. 7401 et seq.; Subchapter IX of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6991 et 
seq.; and the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act, 42 
U.S.C. 11001 et seq. Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, 
Sherwin-Williams will pay a civil penalty of $4.7 million, perform 
supplemental environmental projects that will cost the company a total 
of $1.1 million, undertake a corrective action to investigate and 
remediate contamination to the soil and groundwater at and emanating 
from the

[[Page 7474]]

company's Chicago facility, and perform other injunctive relief.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States versus The Sherwin-Williams Company, Civil Action No. 93-
C-4267, and the Department of Justice Reference No. 90-5-2-1-1829.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, Northern District of Illinois, Everett McKinley 
Dirksen Building, Room 1200, 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604; the Region 5 Office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590; and at 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, 
D.C. 20005, 202-624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be 
obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G 
Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. In requesting a copy, 
please refer to the referenced case and enclose a check in the amount 
of $32.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), payable to the 
Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-3988 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
AHT 2013 10-K - EX 10.3.1.1






Exhibit 10.3.1.1


 
 
ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
FIRST AMENDMENT
               WHEREAS, Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Ashford Hospitality Trust, Inc. Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (effective January 1, 2008) (the “Plan”) for the benefit of its eligible employees; and
               WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to comply with Code Section 409A and regulations issued thereunder; and
               WHEREAS, in Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Company reserved the right to amend the Plan to comply with Code Section 409A;
               NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by this First Amendment thereto, effective as of January 1, 2008, as follows:
1.  Section 3.1(d) shall be added to the Plan to provide as follows:
“(d) Deferral of Other Amounts. An Eligible Employee may elect to defer such other amounts as determined by the Committee at such time and in such manner as the Committee shall provide in accordance with Code Section 409A and regulations issued thereunder.”
2.  Section 3.2(g) shall be added to the Plan to provide as follows:
“(g) Deferral of Other Amounts. Any election to defer other amounts shall be made during the election period established by the Committee in accordance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.”
3.  Section 5.1 shall be revised by deleting the phrase “, Disability,” to read as follows:
“In the event a Participant incurs a Separation from Service for any reason other than death or Retirement, the Participant’s Account shall be paid in a single lump-sum payment within 45 days following such Separation from Service.”
4.  Section 5.4(a) shall be revised to read as follows:
“In the event the Committee makes a determination that a Participant has incurred a Disability, the Participant’s Account shall be paid as of such date in the form designated by the Participant in accordance with Section 5.4(b) below.”
5.  The first sentence of Section 5.6(a) shall be amended by adding the phrase “ and any other amounts deferred under the Plan” immediately after the phrase “Base Salary, Bonus deferrals and RSU deferrals”, to read as follows (underlined to show this clarification):
“During the annual enrollment for each Plan Year, a Participant may designate a date or dates that any portion of his or her Base Salary, Bonus deferrals and RSU deferrals and any other amounts deferred under the Plan attributable to such Plan Year shall be paid prior to Separation from Service.”
6.  Except as modified herein, the Plan is specifically ratified and affirmed.
               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Plan is executed this 31st day of December, 2008, to be effective as herein provided.









	
						
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	ASHFORD HOSPITALITY TRUST, INC.
 
	 

	 
	 
	  
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:  
	/s/ David A. Brooks
	 

	 
	 
	  
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Printed Name:
	David A. Brooks
	 

	 
	 
	  
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Title:  
	Chief Legal Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ML Life Insurance Company of New York
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Nikos K. Kardassis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ NIKOS K. KARDASSIS
Nikos K. Kardassis
President and
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 27, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ML Life Insurance Company of New York and will be retained by ML
Life Insurance Company of New York and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
67432 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 24, 1997 / Notices

People’s Republic of China and in July,

1993 an amendment removed Spain

from the skills list.

A comprehensive revised Skills List

was published in the Federal Register

on January 16, 1997. This list became

effective March 17, 1997.

This notice amends FR Vol. 62, Doc.

97–677, January 16, 1997.

Accordingly, the Exchange Visitor

Skills List, is further amended by

deleting the Czech Republic from said

list. It also provides retroactive release

from the skills list obligation for citizens

of countries which are not listed on the

Exchange Visitor Skills List.

Dated: December 18, 1997.

Les Jin,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 97–33499 Filed 12–23–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8230–01–M

UNITED STATES INFORMATION

AGENCY

Voice of America Seeks Private Sector

Partners, Joint Ventures & Corporate

Underwriting

AGENCY: United States Information

Agency.

ACTION: Seeking private sector partners,

joint ventures & corporate underwriting.

SUMMARY: The Voice of America (VOA)

is the United States Government’s

world-wide broadcasting service and a

major component of the U.S.

Information Agency’s (USIA)

International Broadcasting Bureau. VOA

has an unparalleled worldwide news

gathering service, with more than 25

bureaus around the globe; it produces a

wide variety of programming in 52

languages, including English, reaching

about 86 million people around the

globe; it has a 55-year worldwide

reputation for accuracy and excellence,

making it far and away the best known

and respected American source of news

and information in the world; millions

of people have learned English by

listening to the English teaching and

Special English programs of VOA; many

of its language services, such as the

Spanish and Portuguese Services for

Latin America (VOA Latin America),

now work with a strong line-up of about

107 local affiliate stations.

VOA is prepared to explore a variety

of possible arrangements with the

private sector and accept proposals for

joint ventures, corporate underwriting,

and other relationships designed to

further its mission while reducing the

expenditure of taxpayer dollars. The

Agency is authorized, pursuant to 22

U.S.C. 1437, to encourage and utilize

private agencies’ participation,

including existing American press,

publishing, radio, et. al., in carrying out

its mission.

Accordingly, the U.S. Information

Agency and its International

Broadcasting Bureau are seeking private

sector partners for its various VOA

programs and program services.

Agreements with more than one

organization could result from this

announcement. Written expressions of

interest should be submitted to John G.

Busch, Office of Contracts, 301 4th St.,

SW., Room M–22, Washington, DC

20547; telephone no. 202–205–5480; fax

no. 202–105–5466; or Internet:

JBUSCH@USIA.GOV. All

correspondence will be considered.

Dated: December 18, 1997.

John G. Busch,

Senior Contracting Officer, Office of

Contracts.

[FR Doc. 97–33568 Filed 12–23–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8230–01–M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph E. BISCHOFF.

No. 62426.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Joseph E. Bischoff applying for writs of review, certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Orleans Parish.

Writ denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 25, 2016

p0518

Order 

Clerk

May 25, 2016

152319

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152319

COA: 320197

Oakland CC: 2013-009924-AR

ALI ZAID, 52-4 District Ct: 12-004518-FY

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment 

discussing the weight and effect of the evidence presented at the preliminary examination 

and directing arraignment in the Oakland Circuit Court on a felony Information. The 

Court of Appeals erred in making factual findings and binding over this case to the circuit 

court for trial. We REMAND this case to the 52-4 District Court for further proceedings 

not inconsistent with the remainder of the Court of Appeals judgment. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2017

No. 04-17-00455-CR

Peter TREVINO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR3106

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is granted. 

We order appellant to file the appellant’s brief by December 29, 2017. Counsel is advised that no 

further extensions of time will be granted absent a timely motion that (1) demonstrates 

extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the court of the efforts counsel 

has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief 

will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline. The court does not generally 

consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary circumstance.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### Jesse WALDEN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 44231.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Nov. 21, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN DEKLE, JJ., concur. and

ERVIN, Acting C. J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          36,295
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  299,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,695
<INVENTORY>                                    159,370
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               520,547
<PP&E>                                       1,225,390
<DEPRECIATION>                                 676,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,380,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,699
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,267
<OTHER-SE>                                     909,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,380,602
<SALES>                                        196,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               808,330
<CGS>                                          129,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  543,873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,563
<INCOME-TAX>                                    43,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,181
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
        

</TABLE>
#### Marvin Gerald CARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 75-737.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 16, 1977.

Marvin Gerald Carson, pro se, Jack 0. Johnson, Public Defender, Bartow, and Wayne Chalu, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

*840Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we find the appellant has failed to demonstrate any reversible error; therefore, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

The record indicates appellant was sentenced to prison “at hard labor.” To be imprisoned “at hard labor” is improper because no existing state statute provides for imprisonment at hard labor as a sentence for any offense. *McDonald v. State,*321 So.2d 453 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

Remanded for the purpose of striking the language “at hard labor” from the sentencing order; otherwise affirmed. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

BOARDMAN, C. J., and HOBSON and OTT, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4292]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-67; RM-8996]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Freeport, IL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by 
Highland Broadcasting Company proposing the allotment of Channel 295A 
at Freeport, Illinois, as the community's third local FM transmission 
service. Channel 295A can be allotted to Freeport in compliance with 
the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 5.4 kilometers (3.4 miles) north to avoid short-spacings 
to the licensed sites of Station WSWT(FM), Channel 295B, Peoria, 
Illinois, and Station WSJY(FM), Channel 297B, Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin. 
The coordinates for Channel 295A at Freeport are North Latitude 42-19-
28 and West Longitude 89-35-13.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before April 7, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 22, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Henry 
E. Crawford, Esq., 1150 Connecticut Ave., NW., Suite 900, Washington, 
DC 20036 (Counsel for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-67, adopted February 
7, 1997, and released February 14, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-4292 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P