alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,,~;. , ."i';~.'..~ ;'., 

~:!o 'lE.'S ~ HH riq 11' ~ ~~_..l ;\ ~ ~ ,)~~ i?~::\ ~1~~ /~:§d:' (,Ji ~ 't ~
 ~I 

\\\\ , 53l¡11j- 411/ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,~ 0,ì~ \, I;.\\\l ~._..#p~ FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ~""~ 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES
 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., ) Docket No. 9327 

Respondent. ) 

) 

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY 

RELATED TO JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. 

On Januar 13,2009, Respondent Polypore International, Inc. ("Respondent") and nonpar Johnson Controls, Inc. ("JCI") fied a Stipulation for Amended Protective Order Governing 

Discovery MateriaL. JCI has raised a concern over Mr. Michael Shor, Special Counsel to 

Respondent, having access to certain information of JCI designated as highly confidential due to 

Mr. Shor's past involvement in dealings between Respondent and JCI. Complaint Counsel, 

Respondent and JCI (collectively, "the Paries"), stipulated and agreed that in order to protect the 

interests of JCI against the improper use and disclosure of highly confidential and competitively 

sensitive information submitted or produced in connection with the above captioned matter, it is 

necessar to amend the protective order to provide for an additional category of documents that 

wil be subject to heightened protection.
 

the Paries, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the October 23, 

2008 Protective Order Governing Confidential Material (the "Protective Order") be and hereby 

is amended as follows: 

Based upon the Stipulation of 


1. Documents produced or submitted by JCI in connection with the above captioned 

matter that are designated as "Highly Confidential Material-FTC Docket No. 9327" shall not be 

disclosed to Michael Shor, Polypore Special Counsel. 

2. All other provisions of the Protective Order shall remain unaffected by this 

Amendment. 

ORDERED: j)~~
 D. Michael Cha pell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Date: Januar 15, 2009
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 13, 2011 

Order 

 

October 13, 2011 

143442 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 143442 

v CoA: 296777 

 Wayne CC: 09-020825-FC 

BISHOP PERRY, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, defendant-appellant is ordered to show cause in 

writing within 14 days why his application for leave to appeal should not be dismissed 

for failure to pay the entry fee prescribed by MCR 7. 319(B)(7).
#### Willie Charles HARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Irving WALTMAN and Albert N. Cohen, Petitioners, v. FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION and Ronald L. Myers, Respondents.

No. 71-231.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 28, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1971.

Waterhouse & Shuman, Orlando, for petitioners.

Stanley A. Reese, Winter Park, for respondents.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioners have sought review here by certiorari of an order of the Florida Real Estate Commission which found them guilty of violations of the Real Estate License Law, F.S. § 475.25, F.S.A., and suspended their registration as brokers for a period of thirty days. The period of suspension runs concurrently upon each of seven counts upon which petitioners were found guilty. We have reviewed the record and heard argument upon the petition and find no ground upon which the final order of the Commission should be quashed. We do, however, find one provision which should be modified and which will be further discussed.

No useful purpose would be served by an extensive discussion of the evidence which was before the Commission. On this review the petitioners attack the right of the Commission to make rules regarding conduct of the real estate broker’s profession and urges that because petitioners are also attorneys they are exempt from the rules. It is sufficient to say that we find that the Commission’s authority to make the rules in question finds an adequate basis in sect. 475.05 and sect. 475.25, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. See Miller Company v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 667; Lee v. Delmar, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 252. It may further be noted that petitioners were not exempt from the rules of the Commission simply because they were also attorneys. See Tobin v. Courshon, Fla.1963, 155 So.2d 785; State ex rel. Bodner v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla.1956, 99 So.2d 582.

We turn now to the finding which must be modified. Counts 5 and 7 of the charges alleged that the petitioners converted certain funds to their own use. The *33Commission found these counts proven and in its order concluded as a matter of law that the petitioners were guilty of dishonest dealings and breach of trust in a public transaction. We find that these conclusions are not supported by the evidence and that while the record does support a finding that petitioners have been guilty of the mismanagement of trust funds it does not establish dishonest dealings and breach of trust.

Therefore the petition for certiorari is granted and the final order of the Commission is amended by striking therefrom the language of paragraph four and five of the “Conclusions of Law” insofar as this language purports to find the petitioners guilty of dishonest dealings and breach of trust. In all other particulars the final order of the Commission stands as written together with the penalty imposed.

Certiorari granted and order modified.
#### Norris EPPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. N-2.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 9, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 1970.

*251Norris Epps, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a lower court order denying his post-conviction motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed under Rule 1.850.

Appellant was convicted, along with two companions, of robbing a Standard Oil station just off the interstate highway in Marion County, Florida, on July 25, 1967. His conviction, along with that of his two companions, was reviewed by this court on direct appeal and affirmed on April 10, 1969. See Avis v. State, Fla.App., 221 So.2d 235.

In his motion to vacate, appellant asserts several grounds relating to the sufficiency of the evidence on the question of identification. These questions were considered and rejected by this court as being without merit on the direct appeal. The only new claim asserted in the motion not heretofore considered by the court relates to the court’s failure to provide separate counsel for appellant at the trial. In reviewing the averments contained in the motion to vacate considered by the trial court, we fail to find that this claim was presented to the trial judge for his consideration. Nothing in the motion indicates that a request for separate counsel was' made to the trial court nor that there were any objections interposed to the representation of appellant and his codefendants by one attorney. We have held that where no objection was raised at the trial as to the appointment of a single attorney to represent two or more codefendants, no constitutional error is shown. Rogers v. State, 212 So.2d 367 (Fla.App.1968); and Belton v. State, 211 So.2d 238 (Fla.App.1968).

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

I am the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of The
Banker's Store, Inc., a New York corporation (the "Company").  I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q/A of the
Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2009 and filed with the
U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 23, 2009
        -----------------
                                           /s/ Thomas C. Cook
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Thomas C. Cook
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Principal Financial Officer


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of Decorator Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William A. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 17 , 2009

By: /s/  William A. Johnson.

William A. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer





Date: November 17 , 2009

By: /s/  Michael K. Solomon.

Michael K. Solomon, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION





I,
Cynthia A. Hayden, President, hereby certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the
"small business issuer");





2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by the report;





3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:





(a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
subsidiaries, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and;





(c)
disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





(a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.








/s/ Cynthia A. HaydenCynthia
      A. HaydenPresidentJanuary
      20, 2009
#### WAYNE AKERS FORD, INC., Appellant, v. Irving SHERMAN and Ford Motor Company, Appellees.

No. 72-754.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 11, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34148]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 
National Advisory Child Health and Human Development Council and its 
Subcommittee on Planning and Policy, Meetings

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the National Advisory Child Health and Human Development 
Council on January 26-27, 1998. The meeting will be held in Building 
31, Conference Room 6, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, 
Maryland. The Subcommittee on Planning and Policy will be held on 
January 26, 1998, in Building 31, room 2A03, from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 
a.m. The Subcommittee meeting will be open to the public and the agenda 
includes program plans and the agenda for the next Council meeting. 
Attendance by the public will be limited to space available.
    The Council meeting will be open to the public on January 26 from 
9:00 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. The agenda includes reports by the Director, 
NICHD and the Developmental Biology, Genetics and Teratology Branch, 
observance of the Institute's thirty-fifth anniversary, and other 
business of the Council. The meeting will be open on January 27 upon 
completion of the review of applications at approximately 1:00 p.m. to 
adjournment if any policy issues are raised which need further 
discussion.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) 
and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, United States Code and section 10(d) of Public 
Law 92-463, the meeting of the full Council will be disclosed to the 
public on January 27 from 8:00 a.m. to approximately 1:00 p.m. for the 
review, discussion, and evaluation of individual grant applications. 
These applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Ms. Mary Plummer, Executive Secretary, NACHHD Council, 6100 
Executive Boulevard, Room 5E01, National Institutes of Health, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7510, Area Code 301, 594-7232, will provide a 
summary of the meeting and a roster of Council members as well as 
substantive program information. Individuals who plan to attend the 
open session and need special assistance, such as sign interpretation 
or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Ms. Plummer.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. [93.864, 
Population Research, and 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children], 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
LaVeen Ponds,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-34148 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Numbers
333-148163, 333-132607 and 333-162513 on Form S-8 of NaturalNano, Inc. of our
report, dated April 9, 2010, on the consolidated
financial statements as of and for the periods ended December 31, 2009,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of NaturalNano,
Inc..  Our report, dated April 9, 2010, relating to the
consolidated financial statements includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an
uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.




/s/
Freed, Maxick & Battaglia, CPAs, PC





Buffalo,
NY


Dated:  April
9, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4396]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC) 
Meeting

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee 
(ETTAC) will hold its eighth plenary meeting. The ETTAC was created on 
May 31, 1994, to promote a close working-relationship between 
government and industry and to expand export growth in priority and 
emerging markets for environmental products and services.

DATES AND PLACE: February 27, 1997 from 9:00 a.m to 3:00 p.m. The 
meeting will take place in Room 3407 of the Department of Commerce, 
14th Street and Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington D.C. 20230.
    The agenda will include a discussion of ETTAC recommendations that 
were presented to the Secretary of Commerce in October, 1996; future 
steps for the ETTAC; and the current status of ETTAC memberships.
    This program is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Amy Bellanca, Department of Commerce, Room 1002, 
Washington D.C. 20230. Seating is limited and will be on a first-come, 
first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Environmental 
Technologies Exports, Room 1003, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230, phone (202) 
482-5225, facsimile (202) 482-5665 TDD 1-800-833-8723.

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
Eric Fredell,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Environmental Technologies 
Exports.
[FR Doc. 97-4396 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
Exhibit 99.1      SEC Certificate


         The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange
Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1349), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event
of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Re:      Di Giorgio Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     In accordance with the  requirements  of Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1349), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(i)  this Current  Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements  of
     Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o (d)); and

(ii) the information  contained in this report fairly presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of Di Giorgio
     Corporation.

     Dated as of this 29th April 2003.


/s/ Richard B. Neff                              /s/ Lawrence S. Grossman
-----------------------------                    --------------------------
Richard B. Neff                                  Lawrence S. Grossman
Chief Executive Officer                          Chief Financial Officer
Order entered September 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00982-CV

JOHNNY AGUINAGA, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JAT PROJECTS HOLDINGS TEXAS, LLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-10069

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ September 15, 2021 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and 

extend the time to October 18, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald ROBINSON and Wilbert Prescott, Jr.

No. 62538.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Donald Robinson applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and stay order. Parish of Caddo.

Denied.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### Noelie M. HOTARD. v. Richard R. HOTARD.

No. 62183.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Richard R. Hotard, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of St. Charles. 357 So.2d 52.

Writ denied.
Document

Exhibit 10.1.4

SUPPLEMENT TO SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY
Reference is hereby made to the Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guaranty (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Guaranty”) made as of January 2, 2020, by each of the Material Domestic Subsidiaries of Arcosa, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”) listed on the signature pages thereto (each, an “Initial Guarantor” and together with any additional Subsidiaries of the Borrower, which become parties thereto and together with the undersigned, the “Guarantors”) in favor of the Administrative Agent, for the ratable benefit of the Holders of Guaranteed Obligations, under the Credit Agreement.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Guaranty.  By its execution below, the undersigned StonePoint Materials LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “New Guarantor”), agrees to become, and does hereby become, a Guarantor under the Guaranty and agrees to be bound by such Guaranty as if originally a party thereto.  By its execution below, the undersigned represents and warrants as to itself that all of the representations and warranties contained in Section 2 of the Guaranty are true and correct in all respects as of the date hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, New Guarantor has executed and delivered this Annex I counterpart to the Guaranty as of this 31st day of August, 2021.
STONEPOINT MATERIALS LLC


By:      /s/ Gail M. Peck            
Gail M. Peck
Vice President
#### GOLD KEY MARKETING, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. LOU MELISKA PONTIAC, an Ohio corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-1161.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 26, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.