alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# PET RSB RG ALASKA Sent: Via emailto: Kevin Adams 

### Kevin.Adams dot._ov January23, 2013 Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and DomesticAnalysis Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAve.,S.E. 

### Washington D.C. 20590 '/
Re: AlaskaAirlines
- Essential Air Service, DocketOST-1998-4899 · . (,.fl

Alaska Airlines is a critical component to the economic well being of the Southeast Alaska communities of Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell and Yakutat. Alaska Airlines' 30 years of reliable, dedicated service to ourcommunities has been, and continues to be, the most important transportation link for both passengers and cargo in this remote, aviation-dependent area.
Alaska's service connects our passengers and cargo to the Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or Seattle airports where our community can access the airline's extensive route system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The passenger and cargo aircraft that Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that other carriers are unable to provide. In addition, Alaska Airlines aircraft are equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, enabling the airline to access these five communityairports during inclementweather. This improved equipment has reduced diversions and cancellations, enabling our residents, businesses and products to move dependably in and out ofthe region. The Petersburg Borough Assembly strongly urges the Department to .approve the January 8, 2013 application of Alaska Airlines 

### to continue to provide Essential Air Service to Southeast Alaska. Alaska Airlines has been a dedicated friend and family member to our community, providing avital economic stapleto SoutheastAlaska. On Behalfofthe Petersburg BoroughAssemblyand Residents,

# ~~ MarkJensen Mayor

Borough Administration PO Box329, Petersburg, AK 99833
- Phone (907} 772-4S19 Fax (907)772-3759 www.ci.petersburg.ak.us
#### Earnest GOODMAN, Appellant, v. MIAMI CRANE SERVICE, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.

No. 76-1656.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 20, 1977.

*854Headley & Sudduth, Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellant.

Marlow, Mitzel, Ortmayer & Shofi, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and HUB-BART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Walker & LaBerge, Inc. v. Halligan,*344 So.2d 239 (Fla.1977).
No. 10203.

#### Wilson et al. *v.*Stockwell.

Decided March 10, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Cuyahoga county.

*Mr. Joseph Moore,*for plaintiffs in error.

*Mr. John W. Stockwell; Mr. Theodore M. Bates; Messrs. Dissette, Dissette & Dissette*and *Mr. E. W. Dissette,*for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Si-iauck, C. J., Crew and Spear, JJ., concur.
#### Leo BOISSONNEAULT v. The BILOXI DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION-URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF the CITY OF BILOXI et al.

No. 50601.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 6, 1978.

Halat & Pisarich, Peter Halat, Biloxi, for appellant.

Vlahos & Caranna, Kosta N. Vlahos, Biloxi, for appellee.

Before PATTERSON, C. J., and BROOM and LEE, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harrison County; Lester B. Grant, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

In
accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Registrant hereby certifies to his knowledge that this amendment to
annual report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this amendment to annual report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.

|Date:
April 30, 2007 | /s/ R. Brent
Lenczycki, CPA
      R.
Brent Lenczycki, CPA
                                                                              
      Vice
President and
                                                                              Chief
Financial Officer

      (Principal
Financial and
                                                                              Accounting
Officer)
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Bradley
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A or as a
separate disclosure document.
NUMBER 13-13-00333-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JON CHRISTOPHER KRAATZ, Appellant,

v.

C.P.Z., Appellee.

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Chief Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On July 2, 2013, appellant, Jon Christopher Kraatz, perfected an appeal from a 

judgment rendered against him in favor of appellee, C.P.Z. On July 30, 2013, the Clerk 

of this Court notified appellant that the clerk’s record in the above cause was originally 
2

due on July 29, 2013, and that the deputy district clerk, Tiffany Garza, had notified this 

Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk’s record. The 

Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct 

the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was 

advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of 

this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant has failed 

to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT 

OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this

31st day of July, 2014.
#### Paulette JONES, a/k/a Bertha Paulette Atkins, a/k/a Paulett Jones, a/k/a Cathy Perters, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 77-1473, 77-1474 and 77-1476.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 1978.

Carling H. Stedman and Stephen L. Ras-kin, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Ronald A. Dion, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See *Croteau v. State,*334 So.2d 577 (Fla.1976); *Bernhardt v. State,*288 So.2d 490 (Fla.1974); *Wheeler v. State,*344 So.2d 630 (Fla.2d DCA 1977), and *Randolph v. State,*292 So.2d 374 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clyde ROBINSON.

No. 62579.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 5, 1978.

In re: Clyde Robinson applying for supervisory and remedial writs. Parish of East Carroll.

*881Writ granted. The bail of $50,000.00 previously fixed by the trial judge is reinstated.

Bail fixed in a capital case as a result of a pre-indictment hearing under Code of Criminal Procedure Article 313 is not invalidated, *ipso iacto,*by a subsequent Grand Jury indictment.
Oct. 22, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., 

SE Washington, DC 20590 

Petitioner: 

Howard A. Leipzig 

417 Oyster Road 

North Palm Beach, FL 33408 

561-371-0269 

Email: howieal@gmail.com 

Subject: UAS Section 333 Exemption using the "Summary Grant" process. 

To Whom It May Concern, 

I am a licensed Realtor in the State of Florida and I am requesting a Section 333 exemption so 

that I may be able to use my DJI Phantom 3 Professional for commercial operation in the taking of 

aerial real estate photos and videos for my own real estate customers, as well as other real estate 

agents and other Real Estate related projects. 

I am a former Air Force pilot and I have a Commercial Pilot license #1377082. I do not have a 

current medical certificate but I do have a valid Florida Driver's License that meets the medical 

requirement for this exemption. 

I also have hundreds of hours flying radio control models and many hours flying the DJI Phantom 

2 as well. 

It is well known that sUASs are often considered superior to helicopters due to the lower cost of 

equipment, the reduction of personnel needed to operate and maintain it, reduced noise and zero 

emissions. In addition to providing cost savings and having little to no impact on the 

environment, sUASs provide enhanced safety. These factors are in the best interest of the 

general public. 

For the reasons stated above, I am respectfully requesting that the FAA grant the requested 

exemption as soon as possible. 

The DJI Phantom 3 has a 3 axis camera gimbal and UHD video camera that can capture both 

video and stills photos. 

The frequently updated DJI software sets the height it flies above the ground and restricts 

operation in prohibited or airport control zones. 

The DJI Phantom 3 Professional also has a failsafe function which means that if the 

communication is lost, the aircraft will automatically return to the takeoff point and will land safely. 

The Phantom 3 weighs less than 3 pounds including the on board battery. 

A pre-flight inspection will always be done in accordance with the instruction manual. 

The radio transmitter used for controlling the sUAS is compliant with the applicable regulations 

governing a radio transmitter in the 2.400GHz to 2.4835GHz frequency range. 

I believe I meet all the requirements this exemption requires. 

I am available for any additional information you might require. 

Yo uly, _-;I 

#'~~ -- Howard A. L ipzi t/ / 

Page 1 
Please refer to Attachments: 

A. Pertinent Regulations 

B. DJI Phantom 3 Professional factory manualliks. 

Attachment A: 

Regulations from which this exemption has relevance: 

14 C.F.R. Part 21 

14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b) 

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 

14 C.F.R. 91.9 (b)(2) 

14 C.F.R. 91.103 

14 C.F.R. 91.109 

14 C.F.R. 91.119 

14 C.F.R. 91.121Page 3 

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) 

14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) & (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.205 (b) 

14 C.F.R. 91.215 

14 C.F.R. (91.401 - 91.417) 

Attachment B: 

Link to all DJI user manuals: 

http://www .dji.com/product/phantom-3/download 

Page2
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-91685 and No. 333-92403) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-92403 and No. 333-07785) of adam.com, Inc. of
our report dated February 28, 2000, except as to the second paragraph of Note
17 which is as of March 30, 2000, appearing on page F-1 of this Form 10-K/A.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
April 28, 2000
J-S12011-17

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v.

THOMAS JOHN PETROUSKY 

Appellant No. 1001 MDA 2016

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence May 17, 2016

In the Court of Common Pleas of Schuylkill County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-54-CR-0000689-2015

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OTT, J., and MUSMANNO, J. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED MARCH 09, 2017

In this appeal, Appellant, Thomas John Petrousky, argues that the trial 

court erred in admitting five photographs in his murder trial that he 

characterizes as unduly “gruesome” and “grisly.” See, e.g., Appellant’s 

Brief, at 5 and 7. The probative value of the photographs, he claims, was 

outweighed by their possibility of inflaming the minds and passions of the 

jurors.

There is a glaring problem with Petrousky’s appeal: the photographs 

are not in the certified record. It is an appellant’s responsibility to ensure 

that the certified record contains all the items necessary to review his 

claims. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Tucker, 143 A.3d 955, 963 (Pa. 

Super. 2016); Commonwealth v. B.D.G., 959 A.2d 362, 372 (Pa. Super. 

2008). “When a claim is dependent on materials not provided in the certified 
J-S12011-17

- 2 -

record, that claim is considered waived.” Commonwealth v. Petroll, 696 

A.2d 817, 836 (Pa. Super. 1997) (citation omitted). 

Without the photographs, we cannot conduct a review of Petrousky’s 

issue presented on appeal. See Commonwealth v. Powell, 956 A.2d 406, 

423 (Pa. 2008) (finding claim that an autopsy photograph was unduly 

prejudicial waived “[b]ecause the record does not contain the photograph 

appellant refers to, we cannot assess his description and claim”); Petroll, 

696 A.2d at 836 (finding claim of improperly admitted photographs waived 

where they were not in the certified record). Therefore, we find Petrousky’s 

sole claim waived. 

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 3/9/2017
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the January 12, 2014 reply filed by the Richard Trurnka, President of the

American Federation of Labor, Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) and

Edward Wytkind, President of the Transportation Trades Department, AFL-CIO (TTD)

has been served this 14th day of January, 2014, upon the following persons via email:

ejames@jamhoff.com

efisaacson@jamhoff.com

romanow@pillsburylaw.com

peter.nelson®pillsburylaw.com

steve.morrissey®united.com

thomas.bolling®united.com

dan. weiss@coair.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

howard.kass®Usairways.com

robert. wirick@aa.com

francis.heilseaa.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

cc@eurocockpit.be

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

jesse.elliot@faa.gov

douglas.schwab@faa.gov

nicholas. tsokris@faa.gov

john.allen@faa.gov

anita.mosnereshklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

nssparksssfedex.com

gbleopardsefedex.com

russell.baileyeealpa.org

jonathan.cohen@alpa.org

dberg@airlines.org

jcasey@airlines.org

kglatz@airlines.org

urskresstate.gov

pvs@eurocockpit.be

sshur@traveltech.org

eugene.alford@trade.gov

felix.leinemann@eeas.europa.eu

clytle@Portoakland.com
kgeorge@broward.org

mrichardson@swapa.org

David.Batchelor@sesarju.eu

attar .Ostnes@sd.dep.no

John.Hanlon@ELFAA.com

paul.gretch@dot.gov

Robert.Finamore@dot.gov

cc@eurocockpit.be
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34151]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) 
meeting:

    Name of SEP: Biomedical Research Technology (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Date: January 16, 1998.
    Time: 11 a.m.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6507 Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, MD 20892-7965.
    Contact Person: Dr. Bela Gulyas, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6705 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7965, Room 6018, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-7965, (301) 435-0820.
    Purpose/Agenda: To evaluate and review grant applications. This 
notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the above 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.371, 
Biomedical Research Technology, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
LaVeen M. Ponds,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-34151 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, each of the
undersigned officers of Rio Tinto plc, registered in England and Wales (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2012 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                 |  |                     |  |        |  |                 
|------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------
|/s/ Sam Walsh       |  |                 |  | /s/ Guy Elliott    
|Name:               |  | Sam Walsh       |  |                     |  | Name:  |  | Guy Elliott     
|Title:              |  | Chief executive |  |                     |  | Title: |  | Finance director
|                    |  |                
|Date: 14 March 2013 |  |                 |  | Date: 14 March 2013

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated
by reference in any filing under the Securities Act.



---

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange
Act, each of the undersigned officers of Rio Tinto Limited, registered in Victoria, Australia, (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2012 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                 |  |                     |  |        |  |                 
|------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------
|/s/ Sam Walsh       |  |                 |  | /s/ Guy Elliott    
|Name:               |  | Sam Walsh       |  |                     |  | Name:  |  | Guy Elliott     
|Title:              |  | Chief executive |  |                     |  | Title: |  | Finance director
|                    |  |                
|Date: 14 March 2013 |  |                 |  | Date: 14 March 2013

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated
by reference with any filing under the Securities Act.
#### John MLADINICH et al. v. T. L. JAMES & COMPANY, INC.

No. 50618.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 6, 1978.

O’Barr, Hulbert & O’Barr, Clyde Hurl-bert, Biloxi, for appellants.

Bryant & Stennis, Rae Bryant, Gulfport, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Harrison County; Frank W. Alexander, Chancellor.

AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
I, Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the“Company”), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:
1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endingJune 27, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.        Dated:  August 11, 2004 /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Terry L. Collins, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argon ST, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 9, 2008   /s/ Terry L. Collins Terry L. Collins  Chief Executive Officer  
32