alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7300 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7300

 To prevent Federal funds from being used to carry out Executive Order 
                     13925, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 22, 2020

  Mrs. Torres of California introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
the Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prevent Federal funds from being used to carry out Executive Order 
                     13925, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defund Executive Orders that 
Suppress Free Speech Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT EXECUTIVE 
              ORDER 13925.

    No Federal funds may be obligated or expended for the salaries and 
expenses of any Federal employee who implements Executive Order 13925 
(85 Fed. Reg. 34079; relating to Preventing Online Censorship).
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4176]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-348]


Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. Alabama Power Company; 
Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amendment to Facility Operating 
License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has granted 
the request of Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (Southern 
Nuclear), to withdraw its August 23, 1996, application for proposed 
amendment to Facility Operating License No. NPF-2 for the Farley 
Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, located in Houston County, Alabama.
    The proposed amendment would have revised the technical 
specifications by modifying the installation method for previously 
licensed steam generator tube elevated tubesheet laser welded sleeves 
in Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1.
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendments published in the Federal Register on September 
11, 1996 (61 FR 47982). However, by letter dated February 7, 1997, 
Southern Nuclear withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated August 23, 1996, and the licensee's 
letter dated February 7, 1997, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. The above documents are available for public 
inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
document room located at the Houston-Love Memorial Library, 212 W. 
Burdeshaw Street, P.O. Box 1369, Dothan, Alabama.

    Dated at Rockville, Md., this 13th day of February 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jacob I. Zimmerman,
Project Manager, Project Directorate II-2, Division of Reactor 
Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-4176 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Laura M. VARNOM, Appellant, v. COLUMBIA OIL COMPANY, a corporation and Ralph Powers, Individually, Appellees.

No. P-18.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 11, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7498-7499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4065]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations

    Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to 
the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 
985, 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978 (43 FR 
13359, March 29, 1978), and Delegation Order No. 85-5 of June 27, 1985 
(50 FR 27393, July 2, 1985), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibit, ``Rodin and Michelangelo'' (See list \1\), 
imported from abroad for the temporary exhibition without profit within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. These objects are 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lenders. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the listed exhibit objects 
at The Philadelphia Museum of Art from on or about March 30, 1997, 
through June 22, 1997, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A copy of this list may be obtained by contacting Ms. Neila 
Sheahan, Assistant General Counsel, at 202/619-5030, and the address 
in Room 700, U.S. Information Agency, 301 4th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20547-0001.


[[Page 7499]]


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Les Jin,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-4065 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
Amendment No. 1             Exhibit 10.b
                                 ---------------
                         CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.
                         -------------------------------
                  1994 STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
                  --------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 11 of the Crown Cork & Seal
Company, Inc. 1994 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan ("Plan"),  Crown Cork
& Seal Company,  Inc. hereby amends the Plan,  effective  September 21, 1998, as
follows:

1.       SECTION 8.8 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

         "8.8.    Termination by Reason of Retirement or Disability:
                  -------------------------------------------------

     (A)  If a Holder's  employment  by the Company,  a Subsidiary  or Affiliate
          terminates by reason of disability  (as  determined by the  Committee)
          any  unexercised  Option  granted  to the  Holder  may  thereafter  be
          exercised  by  the  Holder  (or,  where   appropriate,   the  Holder's
          transferee or legal representative),  to the extent it was exercisable
          at the  time  of  termination  or on  such  accelerated  basis  as the
          Committee may  determine at or after grant,  for a period of 24 months
          or such shorter period as determined by the Committee (3 months in the
          case of an Incentive  Stock Option) from the date of such  termination
          of  employment  or until  the  expiration  of the  stated  term of the
          Option, whichever period is shorter.

     (B)  If a Holder's  employment  by the Company,  a Subsidiary  or Affiliate
          terminates by reason of Retirement,  any unexercised Option granted to
          the Holder may  thereafter  be  exercised  by the  Holder  (or,  where
          appropriate, the Holder's transferee or legal representative),  to the
          extent  it was  exercisable  at the  time  of  termination  or on such
          accelerated  basis as the  Committee  may determine at or after grant,
          for a period of up to five years or such shorter  period as determined
          by the  Committee (3 months in the case of an Incentive  Stock Option)
          from  the  date  of  such  termination  of  employment  or  until  the
          expiration  of the  stated  term of the  Option,  whichever  period is
          shorter."

                                 * * * * * *

     To record the adoption of this  Amendment  No. 1 to the Plan,  Crown Cork &
Seal Company,  Inc. has  authorized its officers to affix its corporate name and
seal effective as of the day and year first above written.



CORPORATE SEAL                              CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.


Attest:                                     By:    /s/ Alan W. Rutherford
                                            Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.3


STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT


 


DATE OF ISSUE:  February 26, 2014


ADVISING BANK: CHINA MERCHANTS BANK CO.,
LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH


 


STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT REF.: 110LG1400024


DATE OF EXPIRY: August 25 , 2015


BENEFICIARY (NAME AND ADDRESS): CHINA MERCHANTS
BANK CO., LTD., NEW YORK BRANCH, NY


 


DEAR SIRS,


AT THE REQUEST OF SHANDONG TAIBANG BIOLOGICAL
PRODUCTS CO., LTD. (APPLICANT), WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO.110LG1400024 IN YOUR FAVOUR UPTO
THE AGGREGATE AMOUNT (INCLUSIVE OF ALL ACCRUED INTERESTS AND CHARGES) OF CNY194,600,000.00 (SAY CHINESE YUAN ONE HUNDRED NINETY
FOUR MILLION SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND ONLY).


 


THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IS AVAILABLE
WITH US BY PAYMENT UPON OUR RECEIPT OF YOUR DEMAND BY AUTHENTICATED SWIFT STATING THAT THE AMOUNT DRAWN BY YOU REPRESENTS THE UNPAID
INDEBTEDNESS (INCLUSIVE OF ACCRUED INTERESTS AND CHARGES) DUE TO YOU BY CHINA BIOLOGIC PRODUCTS, INC. (BORROWER) UNDER THE CREDIT
FACILITIES GRANTED BY YOU TO THE BORROWER.


 


SPECIAL CONDITIONS:


PARTIAL DRAWING IS ALLOWED.


MULTIPLE DRAWINGS ARE ALLOWED.


ALL BANK CHARGES RELATING TO THIS STANDBY
LETTER OF CREDIT ARE FOR APPLICANT’S ACCOUNT.


 


THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IS NON-TRANSFERABLE.


 


THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT WILL EXPIRE
ON                   , 2015 (EXPIRY DATE). THE ABOVE-MENTIONED DEMAND MUST REACH US ON OR BEFORE THE EXPIRY DATE. PAYMENT WILL BE EFFECTED WITHIN
5 BUSINESS DAYS UPON OUR RECEIPT OF YOUR DEMAND BY SWIFT


 


WE HEREBY AGREE AND UNDERTAKE THAT YOUR
DEMAND DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONOURED UPON PRESENTATION


 


THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT
TO THE INTERNATIONAL STANDBY PRACTICES (ISP 98).


 


BEST RGDS


INT’L DEPT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATAMETRICS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-2000
<CASH>                                     127
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              317
<ALLOWANCES>                               (50)
<INVENTORY>                                2,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3,427
<PP&E>                                     7,857
<DEPRECIATION>                             5,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             9,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      9,280
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                   190
<OTHER-SE>                                 43,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               9,128
<SALES>                                    2,635
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,635
<CGS>                                      3,977
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              3,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2,530
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,379
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,251)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,251)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.28)



</TABLE>
No. 00-7146.

#### Lau *v.*Meddaugh et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari before judgment denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 28, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 28, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0033. JASON PARRISH, AS TEMPORARY ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF HEATHER RUGGLES, DECEASED et al. v. ST. JOSEPH'S/CANDLER HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: STCV1702121
<PAGE>


                 EXHIBIT 15 -- INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT
 
 
The Board of Directors
Cubic Corporation
 
 
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic
Corporation as of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated condensed
statements of income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended December
31, 1996 and 1995.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.
 
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
 
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements
referred to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.
 
We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September
30, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings,
and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report
dated December 4, 1996, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet at September 30, 1996, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.
 
 
                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
February 3, 1997
San Diego, California
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of BJ Services Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, T. M. Whichard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|BY    /s/    T.M. Whichard                              
|--------------------------------------------------------
|T. M. Whichard Chief Financial Officer December 17, 2003
#### R-C-B-S CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, George Bull and Mary T. Bull, his wife, and Herbert E. Patten and Harriet W. Patten, his wife, Appellants, v. Hans G. TANZLER, Jr., as Mayor of the City of Jacksonville, Florida, John F. Lanahan, as President of the City Council of the City of Jacksonville, and the City of Jacksonville, a municipal corporation, Appellees.

No. M-343.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 3, 1970.

*280Harry W. Meshaw, Jr., of Smith, Hul-sey, Schwalbe, Spraker & Nichols, Jacksonville, for appellants.

William L. Durden, David U. Tumin, and William D. Moore, Jacksonville, for appellees.

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment of dismissal of a complaint with prejudice.

The amended complaint, alleges, inter alia, that the City officials of Jacksonville began discussions pertaining to the acquisition of land for developing a recreational park for public use. It is also alleged that this would cause irreparable damage to plaintiff’s property. Other allegations attacked the failure of the City officials to follow proper procedures etc. for acquiring lands and determining needs therefor, as required by law.

A motion to dismiss the original complaint was filed and granted. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint was also filed, in which the grounds of the first motion were adopted, by reference as grounds for dismissal of the amended complaint.

The court indicated its decision to grant the motion to dismiss, and when the plaintiff announced that the amended complaint could not be further amended, entered its order dismissing the complaint, with prejudice.

The primary grounds contained in the motion to dismiss can be reduced to the questions that the alleged cause of action was premature, related to matters discretionary with the City officials and attempted to enjoin action clearly within the charter provisions.

The trial court did not render his findings of fact upon which he based his order of dismissal, but it appears on the face of the complaint that the question of the projected park was only in the discussion stage. Also, it is clear from the complaint that some of the things alleged that should have been done by the City had not been done, were not done because the project had not reached that point.

Without speculating as to just which particular ground or grounds of the motion to dismiss controlled the trial judge’s decision, we do agree that taken as a whole, we think the motion to dismiss should have been granted.

The order appealed from is therefore affirmed.

RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
#### Nellie B. BRIDGES v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 54348.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1974.

In re: Nellie B. Bridges applying for Certiorari or Writ of Review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 286 So.2d 754.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Division of Research Grants; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Division of Research Grants Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review individual grant applications.
    Name of SEP: Behavioral and Neurosciences.
    Date: February 10, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.
    Contact Person: Dr. Kathleen Michels, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5180, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1250.

    Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Sciences.
    Date: February 24-25, 1997.
    Time: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.
    Place: 9:00 a.m.
    Contact Person: Dr. Houston Baker, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5208, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1175.

    Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Sciences.
    Date: March 3-4, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 a.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, Chevy Chase, MD.
    Contact Person: Dr. Houston Baker, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5208, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1175.

    Name of SEP: Multidisciplinary Sciences.
    Date: March 10-11, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, Rockville, MD.
    Contact Person: Dr. Nadarajen A. Vydelingum, Scientific Review 
Administrator, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5210, Bethesda, Maryland 
20892, (301) 435-1176.

    The meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in Sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93,306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 30, 1996.
Paula N. Hayes,
Acting Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-330, Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Appendix 5: HYSPLIT Trajectories for Edgewood by Group and 

# Exceedance Days Over 0.100

ppmFigure 5A - 1 Edgewood Group 1 2008 - 2010 Days (<= 0.078 ppm)Figure 5A - 2 Edgewood Group 2 2008 - 2010 Days (>=0.079 & <= 0.081 ppm)Figure 5A - 3 Edgewood Group 3 2008 - 2010 Days (>=0.082 & <= 0.086 ppm)Figure 5A - 4 Edgewood Group 4 2008 - 2010 Days (>=0.087 & <= 0.091 ppm)Figure 5A - 5 Edgewood Group 5 2008 - 2010 Days (>= 0.091 ppm)Figure 5A - 6 Edgewood Group 1 2006 - 2007 Days (>=0.076 & <= 0.078 ppm)Figure 5A - 7 Edgewood Group 2 Days 2006 - 2007 (>=0.079 & <= 0.081 ppm)Figure 5A - 8 Edgewood Group 3 Days 2006 - 2007 (>=0.082 & <= 0.086 ppm)Figure 5A - 9 Edgewood Group 4 Days 2006 - 2007 (>=0.087 & <= 0.090 ppm)Figure 5A - 10 Edgewood Group 5 Days 2006 - 2007 (>=0.091 ppm)



### 2008 - 2010Figure5A - 11 Edgewood Days 2006 - 2010 (>0.0100 ppm)

7/9/2007 TrajectoriesFigure 5A - 12 Edgewood Days 2006 - 2010 (>0.0100 ppm)