alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                Certification of Principal Executive Officer and
                     Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350



In connection with the Form 10-Q (the "Report") of Continental Global Group,
                       ---------                   --------------------------
                     Name of Report]                  [Name of Company]

Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending June 30, 2003, we Robert W. Hale,
----                                       -------------     --------------
                                              [Date]         [Name of Officer]

President, and J.L. Dickinson, Vice President, of the Company, certify that:
---------      --------------  --------------
[Title]       [Name of Officer]  [Title]


(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert W. Hale                           /s/ J. L. Dickinson
------------------------------------         ----------------------------------
Robert W. Hale, President                    J. L. Dickinson, Vice President

Dated:  August 13, 2003


Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Del O’NEAL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 39787.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 28, 1970.

Lloyd H. Moe, Varón & Stahl, Hollywood, for petitioner.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen. and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After oral argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued.

The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., ROBERTS, DREW and CARLTON, JJ., and MURPHREE, Circuit Judge, concur.
No. 00-6433.

#### Weatherspoon *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 5959]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3379]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ASSASSINATION RECORDS REVIEW BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATES: February 13-14, 1997.

PLACE: ARRB, 600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

    1. Review and Accept Minutes of Closed Meeting.
    2. Review of Assassination Records.
    3. Other Business.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen Sullivan, Assistant Press 
and Public Affairs Officer, 600 E Street, NW., Second Floor, 
Washington, DC 20530. Telephone: (202) 724-0088; Fax: (202) 724-0457.
David G. Marwell,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-3379 Filed 2-6-97; 2:32 pm]
BILLING CODE 6118-01-P
02.12.2014 Council for Economic Education - Proprietary 1
Survey of the States 2014

2 02.12.2014 

Methodology

To ensure the integrity of the study, CEE conducts a 

careful review of current policies and legislation specific 

to each state.

 

CEE also contacts expert representatives in each state 

with the specific knowledge necessary to answer the 

survey accurately.

These include:

 Social Studies specialists at state departments of 

education in all 50 states and the District of Columbia

 The chief executives of state councils on economic 

education, affiliated with CEE

Council for Economic Education - Proprietary 
Survey of the States 2014

3 02.12.2014 Council for Economic Education - Proprietary 
Leading the Charge

02.12.2014 4

Partnership

STATE LEGISLATURES

 Clear requirements

INDIVIDUAL LEADERS

- Educators/Business/Community

 Drive, support and implement

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

 Advocate (what/how) – Convene - Invest

Council for Economic Education - Proprietary 
Smart Tennessee

02.12.2014 5

Tennessee Financial 

Literacy Commission

Treasurer David Lillard

University of Memphis Center 

for Economic Education

Dr. Julie Heath

Council for Economic Education - Proprietary 
Chicago Public Schools

02.12.2014 6

“Unless we have (financial literacy) embedded in the 

curriculum, we can’t be sure that the people who 

need it will get it.”

~Dr. Helen Roberts, Clinical Associate Professor, 

University of Illinois – Chicago;

 Director, Center for Economic Education

Council for Economic Education - Proprietary 
Roles of Federal Government

02.12.2014 7

• Convener

• Aggregator

• Constituency Builder

• Relationship Broker

• Angel Investor

• Pace Setter

Council for Economic Education - Proprietary 
02.12.2014 8

“The activity, or combination of activities, undertaken 

[to advance economic and financial education] 

inevitably depends on an analysis of the individual 

school district and its needs.”

~Judith Staley Brenneke, 

“An Economy At Risk, the Case for Economics Education”

Make it Happen

Council for Economic Education - Proprietary
2007 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-19-2007

McKendrick v. Comm Social Security

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-1074

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2007 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"McKendrick v. Comm Social Security" (2007). 2007 Decisions. Paper 207.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2007/207
1

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-1074

____________

TRACEY McKENDRICK,

Appellant

vs.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

____________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. Civ. No. 05-CV-01604 ) 

District Judge: Honorable Donetta W. Ambrose

____________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

November 1, 2007

Before: RENDELL, WEIS and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: November 19, 2007)

____________

OPINION 

 

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

Claimant was a thirty-two year old female when an ALJ found her ineligible

for disability payments based on her diabetes, disc disease, thyroid disease, and other
2

conditions. She is a high school graduate and had worked as a nurse’s aide and cashier. 

She complained particularly of pain in her right leg and low back and suffers from a disc

bulge at the L4-5 area. She is able to perform tasks such as driving, cooking, laundering,

and cleaning. She was seen and treated by several physicians. The ALJ concluded on the

basis of their records and the testimony of a vocational expert that she was capable of

sedentary work with some limitations. 

In the District Court, claimant contended that the ALJ did not give enough

weight to the opinion of Dr. Gilchrist, who was treating claimant for pain management. 

The Court concluded, after a review of the physicians’ records, that the ALJ properly

assessed that evidence. We agree with that conclusion. Our review of the record

persuades us that the ALJ’s findings were supported by substantial evidence. See

Hartranft v. Apfel, 181 F.3d 358, 360 (3d Cir. 1999) (stating that the standard of review

for disability determinations is whether the “decision is supported by substantial

evidence.”). 

The evidence of treatment and examinations by other physicians is

consistent with the finding that claimant is able to perform sedentary work subject to the

limitations set forth in the ALJ’s opinion.

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.
#### Neil THORN, Appellant, v. JOHN BEAN DIVISION OF FMC CORPORATION, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-888.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 11, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Richard H. Cooper, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                       1,252,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,376,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,319
<INVENTORY>                                  3,179,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,831,566
<PP&E>                                       4,688,239
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,548,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,353,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,573,743
<BONDS>                                      1,535,864
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,971
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,231,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,353,955
<SALES>                                      3,997,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,997,201
<CGS>                                        2,139,916
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,139,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,379,192
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,385
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                478,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                   165,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            312,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   312,210
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        


</TABLE>
#### Betty BOUCHER, wife of Paul Boucher v. ORLEANS PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 60198.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: Betty Boucher applying for certio-rari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 346 So.2d 1124.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law. The issue is factual.

TATE, J.,

dissents. I would not have disturbed the trial court’s finding of disability resulting from a work-cause psychosis which substantially reduced the market for the plaintiff’s employability.

DIXON and CALOGERO, JJ.,

are of the opinion the writ should be granted.
#### CLEAN RITE COIN WASHER SERVICE, INC., Appellants, v. Richard DOETSCH, Appellee.

Nos. 73-194, 73-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 29, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                       557
<INVENTORY>                                        878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,123
<PP&E>                                          15,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,152
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,969
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,225
<SALES>                                        130,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,043
<CGS>                                          106,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  124,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19




</TABLE>
County of ElDorado Chief Administrative Office Larry T. Combs C hief Admini

strative Offi cer December

8 ,2015 Mr. Rand all S. Fiert z Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591

330 Fair Lane Placerv ill e,CA 95667-4197 Phon
e (530) 621-5530 Fax
( 530) 626-5 7 30 Subje ct: Action Plan Subm

i ssio nPur suant to FAA Polic yand Procedur es Concerning the Use of Airport Re venue (7 9 Fed Reg 66282 -0 1, Novem ber 7, 2014) D earMr. Fiertz, E l Dorado Co unty ha snot imp osed any general sales taxes onavi ation fuel that were not in effect on December 30, 1987 and therefore does not require an action plan. I f you need any additional information, please call ore-mail me. Sincerely

, **rJ~~w a,Jv**  Laura Schwartz Chie f Bu dget Officer laura.schwartz@edcgov.

us (530) 621-6541 cc: Doroth
yHolzem

,Ca lifornia

S ta t e Association of C ounti es Jay Chamberlain, California Department of Finance
**EXHIBIT32.1**

### ** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, WalterJ. Zable, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 
| (1)    |   | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Corporation. |

 

 
| /s/  W. J. Zable                                  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| W.  J. Zable                                      |
| Chairman,  President, and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                              |
| Date: February 4, 2009                       |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION of CFO

 

I, William W. Boyle, certifythat:

 

1)              Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cubic Corporation;

 

2)              Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3)              Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of June 30, 2005; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s quarter ended June 30,2005 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| August 8,  2005     |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ W. W. Boyle          |   |
| W. W. Boyle              |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7038 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7038

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to include additional eligible 
          uses of revenue from tolls, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 27, 2020

Mr. Rose of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to include additional eligible 
          uses of revenue from tolls, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Captive Commuter Toll Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATIONS ON USE OF REVENUES.

    Section 129(a)(3)(A) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
striking clause (v) and inserting the following:
                            ``(v) toll discounts or rebates for use of 
                        a toll facility that has no reasonable 
                        alternative transportation method.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7016 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7016

  To waive the 60-day rule in case of rollover of otherwise required 
                     minimum distributions in 2020.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2020

   Mr. Mast introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To waive the 60-day rule in case of rollover of otherwise required 
                     minimum distributions in 2020.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness for Early Withdrawers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF 60-DAY RULE IN CASE OF ROLLOVER OF OTHERWISE REQUIRED 
              MINIMUM DISTRIBUTIONS IN 2020.

    (a) Qualified Trusts.--Section 402(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Exception for rollover of otherwise required 
                minimum distributions in 2020.--In the case of an 
                eligible rollover distribution described in the second 
                sentence of paragraph (4), subparagraph (A) shall not 
                apply to any transfer of such distribution made before 
                December 1, 2020.''.
    (b) Individual Retirement Accounts.--Section 408(d)(3) of such Code 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(J) Waiver of 60-day rule and once per-year 
                limitation for certain 2020 rollovers.--In the case of 
                a distribution during 2020 to which, under subparagraph 
                (E), this paragraph would not have applied had the 
                minimum distribution requirements of section 401(a)(9) 
                applied during such years, the 60-day requirement under 
                subparagraph (A) and the limitation under subparagraph 
                (B) shall not apply to such distribution to the extent 
                the amount is paid into an individual retirement 
                account, individual retirement annuity (other than an 
                endowment contract), or eligible retirement plan (as 
                defined in subparagraph (A)) as otherwise required 
                under such subparagraph before December 1, 2020.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```