alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
ACCOMPANYING  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATAMETRICS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         JAN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         50
<INVENTORY>                                          3,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,667
<PP&E>                                               7,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       11,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             190
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         11,238
<SALES>                                              1,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,131
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,352)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.07)




</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMTEK International, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 24, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Kirk A. Waldron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)               the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 8, 2004 |
|------------------------|
|                   |   |
| By:                    |  /s/ Kirk A. Waldron |   |
|                   | Kirk A. Waldron |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                   | SMTEK International, Inc. |

 

1

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[AK-931-1310-00-NPRA]


Northeast National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska Draft Integrated 
Activity Plan/Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of additional public hearings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management announces two additional public 
hearings for the purpose of gathering public testimony regarding the 
Northeast National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska Draft Integrated Activity 
Plan/Environmental Impact Statement (IAP/EIS), and its effects on 
subsistence.

DATES:

January 17, 1998, 7:30 p.m., Robert James Community Center, Wainwright, 
Alaska
January 28, 1998, 3:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., Holiday Inn, Financial 
District, 750 Kearny Street, San Francisco, California

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Terland (907-271-3344; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bddac9d8cfd1dcd3d9fddcd693dfd1d093dad2cb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5b2a1b0a7b9b4bbb195b4befbb7b9b8fbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>) or Jim Ducker (907-271-3369; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#016b6574626a647341606a2f636d6c2f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b717f6e78707e695b7a7035797776357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>). 
They can be reached by mail at the Bureau of Land Management (930), 
Alaska State Office, 222 West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau of Land Management published a 
Notice of Availability for the IAP/EIS on December 12, 1997 (62 CFR 
65440, December 12, 1997). That Notice indicates that public hearings 
will be held in seven locations. The Bureau of Land Management has 
since received requests from the public for additional meetings, and 
this announcement provides notice of two additional meetings.

    Dated: December 22, 1997.
Gene R. Terland,
Acting Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. 97-34048 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7314 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish Workers’ Memorial Day 

as a Federal holiday. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2020 

Mr. NORCROSS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to establish Workers’ 

Memorial Day as a Federal holiday. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workers’ Memorial 

5 Day’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WORKERS’ MEMORIAL DAY. 

7 Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is 

8 amended by inserting after the item relating to the Birth9 day of Martin Luther King, Jr., the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7314 IH

1 ‘‘Workers’ Memorial Day.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
================================================================================

EXHIBIT  32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Semper Resources Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Mark G.
Hollo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Mark G. Hollo
----------------------------------------
Mark G. Hollo
Chief Executive Officer










--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Clean Air Act

    In accordance with Departmental policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed consent decree in United States v. 
Franklin Smelting & Refining Corp., Civil Action No. 97-0821, was 
lodged on February 4, 1997 with the United States District Court for 
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
    The complaint, filed contemporaneously with the lodging of the 
proposed consent decree, sought civil penalties and injunctive relief 
against Franklin Smelting & Refining Corporation (``Franklin 
Smelting'') under the Clean Air Act. The complaint alleged that 
Franklin Smelting has violated the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 7401 
et seq., and the Pennsylvania Implementation Plan.
    Under the proposed consent decree, Franklin Smelting has agreed to 
install and operate pollution control equipment, including building 
enclosures and baghouse systems at its facility at Castor Avenue of 
Richmond Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and pay $50,000 in civil 
penalties. The settlement is based on a demonstration by Franklin 
Smelting of its financial inability to pay the United States for any 
additional civil penalties.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20530-0001 and should refer to United States v. Franklin Smelting & 
Refining Corp., DOJ Ref. #90-5-2-1-2041.
    The proposed consent decrees may be examined at the United States 
Attorney's Office, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 615 Chestnut 
Street, Suite 1250, Philadelphia, PA 19106-4476; Region III Office of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, 841 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania 19107-4431; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 ``G'' 
Street, NW., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, (202) 624-0892. A copy of 
the proposed decrees may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library at the address listed above. In requesting a 
copy, please refer to the referenced case and number, and enclose a 
check in the amount of $30.50 (25 cents per page reproduction costs), 
payable to the Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-3637 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of S.P.M., a child, * From the 318th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM66016.

Vs. No. 11-21-00144-CV * January 27, 2022

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
#### Jerald P. KING, Appellant, v. Jeanette G. KING, Appellee.

No. Q-8.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 4, 1973.

*160O’Gwen L. King, of Hahn, Reeves & Barfield, Pensacola, for appellant.

David H. Levin, of Levin, Warfield, Graff, Mabie & Rosenbloum, Pensacola, for appellee.

JOHNSON, Judge.

The appellant has appealed from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which (1) awarded custody of the three minor children to the appellee; (2) awarded $2,000.00 per month to appellee as permanent alimony; (3) awarded appellee lump sum alimony in the amount of $10,000.00; (4) required appellant to pay the children’s school tuition and gave appellee the sole discretion in choosing schools for the children ; (5) required appellant to pay off the existing mortgage on the marital home in the approximate amount of $22,000.00 within ninety (90) days; (6) required appellant to assign one-half interest in certain parcels of land to appellee; and (7) required appellant to pay within thirty (30) days fees to appellee’s attorney in the amount of $10,000.00.

Appellant does not challenge the dissolution itself or the award of custody of the children to the appellee. What he does seek review of is the monetary awards to appellee, and abuse of judicial discretion in these matters is claimed by appellant.

It is well-settled that matters of alimony, child support and other monetary considerations lie within the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge, based upon the evidence presented before him and due consideration of the needs of the recipients and the extent of the obligor’s ability to meet these needs. Such awards will not be disturbed by the appellate courts unless they represent an abuse of judicial discretion or are patently erroneous on the record. The appellant carries the responsibility of clearly demonstrating such error. Rogoff v. Rogoff, 115 So.2d 456 (Fla.App.3rd, 1959); Pross v. Pross, 72 So.2d 671 (Fla.1954).

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs filed herein and have heard oral argument by able counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that, with one exception, the amounts of the awards and the provisions of the final judgment of dissolution of marriage find legal, substantial and competent support in the record. We therefore affirm all the provisions of the final judgment with the exception of that part ordering appellant to pay off the mortgage on the marital home within 90 days. We find this provision to be arbitrary and an abuse of judicial discretion, and can find no reason in the record why appellant cannot continue to make these mortgage payments in monthly installments. Accordingly, that part of the final judgment is reversed and remanded with directions to the trial judge to amend same so as to allow appellant to make the mortgage payments in monthly installments.

Appellee’s attorney is awarded $500.00 for his services in connection with this appeal.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions as hereinabove set forth.

SPECTOR, C. J., and RAWLS, J., concur.
Order filed, July 08, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00517

- CV

____________ JIMMY DIAZ , Appellant

V.
ROBERT T. RICE, ET A L , Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 67021



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due April 11, 2014

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the report er’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jill Friedrichs , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
<PAGE>
 
                                                      Exhibit 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Robert S. Hillas and Mark J. Maten, or either of
them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, to do any and all acts, including the
execution of documents, which said attorneys, or either of them, may deem
necessary or advisable to enable Envirogen, Inc. (the "Company") to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations
and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with
the filing under such Act of an annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998, including the power and authority to sign in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities in which
the signature of the undersigned would be appropriate, such annual report and
any and all amendments thereto and generally to do and perform all things
necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as
the undersigned could do if personally present.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereto set his or her hand this
26th day of March, 1999.



 
                                         /s/ Robert F. Hendrickson
                                         -------------------------            
                                           Robert F. Hendrickson

                                      59
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
 

In the Matter of 

POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)
 

Docket No. 9327 

------------------~)

ORDER ON MOTION TO EXTEND RESPONDENT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO
 

COMPLAINT AND TO SET DATE FOR INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
 

I. 

On September 25,2008, Respondent Polypore International, Inc. ("Polypore," "Daramic" 

or "Respondent"), filed a Motion to Extend Respondent's time to Respond to Complaint and Set 

Date for Initial Scheduling Conference. On the same date, Respondent also filed a Motion for 

More Definite Statement or In the Alternative, for an Order Requiring Clarification of the 

Allegations of and Related to Counts II and III of the Complaint. Complaint Counsel filed its 

Responses to both on September 30, 2008. 

II. 

Respondent seeks to extend the time to file its answer or otherwise respond to October 

20,2008. Respondent also asks that the initial scheduling conference be set for October 22 or 

23, 2008. Complaint Counsel does not oppose the motion, so long as neither the commencement 

of discovery nor trial is delayed. 

III. 

Under the Commission's Rules of Practice, Rule 3.12(a) requires that an answer be filed 

within twenty days of service of the Complaint. In this case, Respondent's answer would be due 

by October 6, 2008. However, under Rule 3.12(a)(l), if the respondent files a motion for more 

definitive statement and it is denied, the answer shall be filed within ten days after service of the 

order of denial or thirty days after service of the complaint, whichever is later, or by other date 

as set by the Administrative Law Judge. 

By Order dated October 2,2008, Respondent's motion for more definite statement was 

denied. Respondent shall file its answer by October 15, 2008. 
Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.21 (b) which requires a scheduling conference within 

fourteen days after the Answer is filed, the initial prehearing scheduling conference will be held 

on October 22, at 2:00 p.m. in Room 532, Federal Trade Commission Building, 600 

Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 

The parties are directed to meet before the prehearing scheduling conference and to 

comply with Commission Rule 3.21 (a). The expected pretrial scheduling order will be provided 

to the parties. The parties are directed to jointly submit any proposed modifications to the Office 

of Administrative Law Judges by October 20,2008, and to discuss any proposed modifications 

at the conference. 

ORDERED: -Ri~aeffha't-t>"tf'-+t---- Administrative Law Judge 

Date: October 2, 2008 

2
#### George PUGH, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. T-228.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 6, 1973.

Ron Shelley, Public Defender, and Peter W. Mitchell, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years imprisonment.

We have given full consideration to the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the order appealed herein is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 713 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility for 

beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for military 

sexual trauma in specialized outpatient or residential programs at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2019 

Mrs. WALORSKI (for herself and Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

eligibility for beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for military sexual trauma in specialized 

outpatient or residential programs at facilities of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 713 IH

1 SECTION 1. BENEFICIARY TRAVEL FOR VETERANS SEEK2 ING TREATMENT OR CARE FOR MILITARY 

3 SEXUAL TRAUMA IN SPECIALIZED OUT4 PATIENT OR RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS OF 

5 THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 111 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by adding at the end 

9 the following subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(H) A veteran whose travel to a specialized 

11 outpatient or residential program at a Department 

12 facility is in connection with treatment or care for 

13 military sexual trauma.’’; and 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub15 section: 

16 ‘‘(h) In this section: 

17 ‘‘(1) The term ‘military sexual trauma’ means 

18 psychological trauma, which in the judgment of a 

19 Department mental health professional, resulted 

20 from a physical assault of a sexual nature, battery 

21 of a sexual nature, or sexual harassment which oc22 curred while the veteran was serving on active duty 

23 or active duty for training. 

24 ‘‘(2) The term ‘sexual harassment’ means re25 peated, unsolicited verbal or physical contact of a 

26 sexual nature which is threatening in character.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•HR 713 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to travel occurring 

3 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John J. Quicke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ John J. QuickeName:  John J. QuickeTitle:   President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)Date:   December 7, 2010
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.