alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

PENSACOLA AVIATION CENTER, LLC 

COMPLAINANT 

v. 

PENSACOLA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 

CITY OF PENSACOLA, FL 

RESPONDENT 

FAA Docket No. 16-12-12 

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME 

On March 26, 2015, counsel for the Respondent, Pensacola International Airport, filed a Motion 

for Extension of Time seeking twenty (20) additional days to respond to the Director's Request 

for Additional Information, dated March 13,2015, to afford the Respondent adequate time to 

prepare a response. The Motion cited delayed receipt of the Request via email and/or Certified 

Mail in justifying the extension request. The Respondent's Motion states that the Counsel for the 

Complainant does not object to the requested relief. Under 14 CPR § 16.11, the Federal 

Aviation Administration may grant the extension of any time period prescribed "where necessary 

or appropriate for fair and complete consideration of matters before the agency, prior to the 

issuance of a Director's Determination." 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 

Respondent Pensacola International Airport's Motion for Extension of Time seeking twenty (20) 

additional days to respond to the Director's Request for Additional Information is granted. The 

Respondent's response is due April 22, 2015. 

Randall S. Fiertz 

Director of Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on April Z-;2015, I served via certified mail a true copy of the 

FAA's Order Granting Extension of Time, addressed to: 

Counsel for Complainant: 

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. 

McBreen & Kopko 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, New York 11753 

Tel: (516) 364-1095 

Fax: (516) 364-0612 

Counsel for Respondent: 

Robert J. Williams, Esq. 

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis, LLP 

Fifth Avenue Place 

120 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2700 

Pittsburgh, PA 15222-3001 

Tel: (412) 577-5223 

Fax: (412) 765-3858 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, (A CO-l 00) 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Cascade Microtech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Sipowicz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Steven Sipowicz    
|Steven Sipowicz        
|Chief Financial Officer
|Cascade Microtech, Inc.
|March 17, 2008         

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any
other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Microtech, Inc. and will be retained by Cascade Microtech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00048CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.11

               RELEASE AND TERMINATION OF SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEES

        WHEREAS, NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), 
issued its 9 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2006 in the principal amount of 
$160,000,000 (the "Securities") pursuant to that certain Indenture (as amended 
and supplemented, the "Indenture"), dated as of April 1, 1996, among the
Company, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein, and State Street Bank and
Trust Company, as Trustee (the "Trustee"); and

        WHEREAS, all capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have 
the meanings ascribed to them in the Indenture; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Indenture and the 
Securities, each of the Subsidiary Guarantors guaranteed the full and prompt 
performance and payment of the Company's obligations under the Indenture and the
Securities; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.3 of the Indenture, notwithstanding any 
other provision of the Indenture, all of the Subsidiary Guarantors shall be 
deemed released (the "Release") from their respective Subsidiary Guarantees and 
all related obligations under the Indenture in the event that all obligations 
(the "Obligations") of the Subsidiary Guarantors under all of their guarantees 
of, and under all of their pledges of assets or other security interests which 
secure, other Indebtedness of the Company (excluding any Senior Indebtedness) 
shall also terminate; and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 13.3 of the Indenture, the Trustee is 
authorized and directed to deliver an appropriate instrument evidencing such 
Release upon receipt of a Company Request accompanied by an Officer's 
Certificate and Opinion of Counsel certifying that all such Obligations of the 
Subsidiary Guarantors have terminated; and

        WHEREAS, the Trustee has received a Company Request accompanied by an 
Officer's Certificate and Opinion of Counsel certifying that all such
Obligations of the Subsidiary Guarantors have terminated;

        NOW, THEREFORE, for full and valuable consideration, the receipt and 
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Trustee hereby (i) releases all
of the Subsidiary Guarantors from their respective Subsidiary Guarantees and all
related obligations under the Indenture and (ii) terminates each of the 
Subsidiary Guarantees.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed this 2nd day of 
February, 1998.


                                            TRUSTEE:
                                            STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
        

                                            By:  /s/ RUTH A. SMITH
                                               --------------------------------
                                            Name: Ruth A. Smith
                                            Title: Vice President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 27, 2017

a0619 

# Order

Clerk June 27, 2017

154690

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154690

COA: 332937

Wayne CC: 12

- 011169

- FC

ZACKARY WILLIAMS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2016

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we a re not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### John Hudson MITCHELL, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 13, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

The
Dayton Power and Light Company

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned officers of The Dayton Power and Light Company (the "Issuer") hereby certify that the Issuer's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2003, which this certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

Signed:

/s/
Stephen F. Koziar
Stephen F. Koziar
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/
Caroline E. Muhlenkamp
Caroline E. Muhlenkamp
Interim Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date:
August 5, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### William KILPATRICK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. P-271.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 31, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15


                     INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Cubic Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic
Corporation as of June 30, 2002, and the related consolidated condensed
statements of income and cash flows for the three-and nine-month periods ended
June 30, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States,
which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an
opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do
not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic
Corporation as of September 30, 2001 and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended
(not presented herein) and in our report dated November 20, 2001, we expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed
balance sheet at September 30, 2001, is fairly stated, in all material respects,
in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.


ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
July 24, 2002
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

The following is the certification required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the annual report of CardioGenesis Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Quinn,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Michael J. Quinn
Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2004

The following is the certification required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the annual report of CardioGenesis Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as
filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Christine G. Ocampo Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Christine G. Ocampo
Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2004

The certifications set forth above shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company.
EXHIBIT 11

                        DATA GENERAL CORPORATION

       COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                               (Unaudited)


                 (In thousands except per share amounts)


                                                         Quarter Ended
                                                      --------------------
                                                      Dec. 30,     Dec. 24
                                                        1995         1994
                                                      -------      -------
Primary earnings per share:
Net income   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      $ 4,709      $24,206
                                                      =======      =======

Weighted average shares outstanding  . . . . . .       38,081       36,550

Incremental Shares from use of treasury
  stock method for stock options . . . . . . . .        2,227        1,663
                                                       ------       ------

Common and common equivalent shares, where
  applicable. . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . . .       40,308       38,213
                                                       ======       ======

Net income per share   . . . . . . . . . . . . .         $.12         $.63
                                                         ====         ====
Earnings per share assuming full dilution:
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $4,709      $24,206

Interest on convertible debentures,
  net of income taxes  . . . . . . . . . . . . .          --(a)      2,422
                                                        ----        ------
Net income for purposes of calculating
  earnings per share assuming full
  dilution   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .       $4,709      $26,628
                                                       ======      =======

Weighted average shares outstanding  . . . . . .       38,081       36,550

Incremental shares from use of treasury
  stock method for stock options . . . . . . . .        2,227        1,735

Incremental shares from assumed conversion
  of convertible debentures  . . . . . . . . . .           --(a)     6,510
                                                        -----       ------
Common shares, assuming issuance of all dilutive
  contingent shares, were applicable . . . . . .       43,308       44,795
                                                       ======       ======

Net income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . .         $.12         $.59
                                                         ====         ====

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a)  For the quarter ended December 30, 1995, the assumed conversion of
     convertible debentures and the use of treasury stock method for stock
     options, giving effect to the incremental shares and the adjustment
     to reduce interest expense, results in anti-dilution and have
     therefore been excluded from the computation.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68301-68302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34141]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

President's Advisory Board on Race

ACTION: President's Advisory Board on Race; notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Advisory Board on Race will meet on January 13 
and 14, 1998, in Phoenix, Arizona at a site or sites to be determined. 
The morning meeting on January 13, 1998 will start at approximately 
10:00 a.m. and will end at approximately 1:00 p.m. The agenda will 
include a meeting of corporate and labor leaders, as well as other 
employee representatives, to discuss the experiences and challenges 
associated with race in the workplace. The events on the first day will 
also include visits of Advisory Board members to local Promising 
Practices in the area of employment. The events on January 13th will 
conclude with a meeting with regional representatives of American 
Indian tribes that will start at approximately 5:00 p.m. and end at 
approximately 7:00 p.m.
    On January 14, 1997 the meeting will begin at approximately 9:00 
a.m. and will end at approximately 6:00 p.m. The meeting will focus 
attention on existing racial disparities in employment and ensuring 
economic opportunities for all Americans.
    The meetings will be open to public on a first-come, first-seated 
basis. Interested persons are encouraged to attend. Members of the 
public will be provided an opportunity to make comments at the meeting 
on January 14th. Members of the public may also submit to the contact 
person, any time before or after the meeting, written statements to the 
Board. Written comments may be submitted by mail, telegram or 
facsimile, and should contain the writer's name, address and

[[Page 68302]]

commercial, government, or organizational affiliation, if any.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:
Contact our main office number, (202) 395-1010, for the exact location 
of the meetings. Other comments or questions regarding this meeting may 
be directed to Randy Ayers, (202) 395-1010, or via facsimile, (202) 
395-1020.

    Dated: December 24, 1997.
Robert Wexler,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-34141 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-AR-M
```
#### Sam SIMONHOFF et al., Appellants, v. Helen KATZ, a widow, Appellee. Joy R. EPSTEIN et al., Appellants, v. Helen KATZ, a widow, Appellee.

Nos. 72-854, 72-850.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 10, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### United States Environmental Protection Agency

Electronic Docket Index for [EPA

- R09

- OAR

- 2011

- 0460]

Revisions to Implement ation Plans, State of California, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District New Source Review Docket Index Category/ Item Number

I. SIP Submittal Documents

 SIP submittal letter from CARB , Rule 214, dated December 7, 2010 I

- A

 SIP submittal letter from CARB , Rule 203, dated January 28, 2011 I

- B

 Rule 2 14 adopted October 28, 2010

– Clean Copy I

- C

 Rule 2 03 adopted on January 27, 2011

– Clean Copy I

- D

 SMAQMD , Final Staff Report, Rules 2 14 , August 1 8, 2010 I

- E

 SMAQMD , Final Staff Report, Rules 20 3 , December 22, 2010 I

- F

II. Federal Register Notice s

 50 FR 25417 (June19,1985) Final SIP approval of Rule 202 II

- A

 75 FR 24409 ( May 5, 2010 ) EPA’s reclassification of the Sacramento Metro Air Basin II

- B

 75 FR 77698 ( December 13, 2010 ) EPA Greenhouse Gas SIP Call II

- C

III. Other Relevant Documents

 Submittal Completeness Letter for Rule 214, dated January 13, 2011 III

- A

 Submittal Completeness Letter for Rule 203, dated May 12, 2011 III

- B

 Technical Support Document for SMAQMD Rules 2 14 & 20 3 , d ated May 6, 2011 III

- C

 SMAQMD Rule 202 (New Source Review), adopted November 20, 1984 II I

- D

 SMAQMD Rule 201 (General Permit Requirements), adopted November 20, 1984 I II

- E

 SMAQMD Rule 203, Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), State Implementation Plan Equivalency Determination , January 28, 2011 III

- F

I V. EPA Rulemaking Documents

 Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking dated May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28942) IV

- A

Notes: 1. A copy of each document is located at the EPA Region 9 office.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of NaturalNano, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Riedlinger,
      President of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Sec. 13650, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








\s\
      Michael D. Riedlinger





Michael D.
      Riedlinger


President


February
      15, 2006
# Not Found

The requested URL /2002/02/lafargeltr.pdf was not found on this server.
#### BURNUP & SIMS, INC., and Continental Insurance Co., Petitioners, v. Charles W. O’BERRY and the Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 43598.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 23, 1973.

Certiorari denied.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ, concur.
Attachment L

Work Sheets used to Ca lculate Pesticide Registrant (Tolerance Petitioner)

Industry Labor Costs

NAICS: 541710

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate 1 = W $72.23 $37.38 $21.50

Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $31.84 $16.48 $9.48

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $104.07 $53.86 $30.98

Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $52.04 $26.93 $15.49

Fully Loaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH $156.11 $80.79 $46.47

1. Data Source: BLS ( http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics5_541710.htm ) May 2011 data

NAICS

- 541700 Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Standard Occupational Codes:

Management: 11

- 0000, Management Occupations

Technical: 19

- 0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

Clerical: 43

- 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. The average for non farm, non federal civilian workers.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth

Edition , EPA

- 452

- 02

- 001, January 2002, pg. 2

- 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the

range of 20

- 70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.