alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-211-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission, Notice of Filing of 
Reconciliation Report

January 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 30, 1996 K N Interstate Gas 
Transmission Co. (KNI) filed its reconciliation report in the above 
captioned docket. The filing relates to KNI's reporting requirement 
pursuant to Section 27 (Crediting of Excess Rate Schedule IT Revenue); 
Section 28 (Crediting of Excess Fixed Storage Cost Revenue); Section 34 
(Crediting of Out of Path Zone Revenue); and Section 35 (Crediting of 
Imbalance Revenue) of its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1-B 
and for its Buffalo Wallow system pursuant to Section 31 (Crediting of 
Excess Rate Schedule IT Revenue) for its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1-D. The reconciliation report addresses in conjunction with 
the effectiveness of the terms of KNI's tariff the reporting period 
October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1996 and presents the results of 
KNI's various revenue crediting requirements and displays the proposed 
disposition of any amounts to be refunded.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). All such motions or protests must be filed on or before 
January 9, 1997. All protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make the protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a petition to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-349 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

In
accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Registrant hereby certifies to his knowledge that this annual report
of Registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.

|Date:
March 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/
Daniel Glassman
      Daniel
Glassman 
                               Chief Executive Officer, President and 
        Member of the
Board of Directors 
              (Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Bradley
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document.
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Certification


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amcast Industrial Corporation (the
"Issuer") on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 29, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Francis J. Drew, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



By /s/ Francis J. Drew
     -------------------
     Francis J. Drew
     Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
     March 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-5687-5]


Notice of Open Meeting: State Voluntary Cleanup Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency will solicit input from a broad array of 
stakeholders on the key principles for adequate state voluntary cleanup 
programs. These principles will be used in the development of a draft 
state voluntary cleanup program guidance which will be issued for 
public comment. Approximately 25 stakeholders have been invited by EPA 
to give oral testimony at the meeting. The stakeholders include the 
State and local governments, industry, citizens, environmental and 
health organizations and members of the National Environmental Justice 
Advisory Committee (NEJAC). Additional information about this meeting 
will be made available on our World Wide Web home page at the following 
address: http://es.inel.gov/oeca/osre.html.

DATES: The meeting will take place on Thursday, February 27, 1997, at 
the Ritz-Carlton Hotel, 2100 Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 
20008. It will begin at 9 a.m and end at 4:30 p.m. An agenda will be 
distributed at the meeting.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to the public and, as 
needed, one hour at the end of the day will be set aside for oral 
comments or questions. Approximately seventy-five seats will be 
available for the public including five seats reserved for the media. 
Seats will be available on a first-come first-served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bruce Pumphrey, Office of Enforcement 
and Compliance Assurance, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M 
St. S.W., 2273-A, Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: 202-564-5106, E-
mail: Pumphrey.bruce @epamail.epa.gov.

    Dated: February 6, 1997.
Barry N. Breen,
Director, Office of Site Remediation Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 97-3521 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1







                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
J. Hinkaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.








/S/ CHARLES J. HINKATY
----------------------
Charles J. Hinkaty
Chief Executive Officer
August 7, 2006
#### Gary A. POLIAKOFF, Appellant, v. NATIONAL EMBLEM INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-925.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 8, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1971.

*478Becker & Kimler, Miami, for appellant.

Adams, George, & Wood and David L. Willing, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J, and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ-

PEARSON, Chief Judge.

The appellant urges that the trial court erred in dismissing his complaint for damages upon a claim of fraudulent misrepresentation. The appellee urges that the complaint was properly dismissed because it showed upon its face that the action was barred by that portion of F.S. § 725.01, F.S.A., which provides:

> “No action shall be brought ** * **upon any agreement that is not to be • performed within the space of one year from the making thereof, unless the agreement or promise upon which such action shall be brought, or some note or memorandum thereof shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith or by some other person by him thereunto lawfully authorized.”

Thus it appears that we are faced with conflicting theories of the case. Appellant construes his action as one in tort for fraudulent misrepresentation. Appel-lees see the action as one upon an oral agreement. The complaint alleges: (1) The appellee, National Emblem, was doing business in Florida as an automobile insurance company; the appellee, Bryan, was the agent and employee of National Emblem. (2) The appellant made a disclosure to the appellees of his driving record and his wish to buy a “non-cancellable” insurance policy. Appellees represented that they would sell him a “non-cancellable” policy. Appellees’ representation was knowingly made and false. (3) Appellant acted upon the false representation by purchasing a policy which was cancelled without stated reason within two months of the date of purchase.

The essential elements of fraud are: (1) a false statement of fact; (2) known by the defendant to be false at the time it was made; (3) made for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to act in reliance thereon; (4) action by the plaintiff in reliance on the correctness of the representation; and (5) resulting damage to the plaintiff. Finney v. Frost, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 617; Abbate v. Nolan, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 433; Tonkovich v. South Florida Citrus Industries, Inc., Fla.App.1966, 185 So.2d 710 (cause remand*479ed Fla.1967, 196 So.2d 438 and Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 579). Using these elements as a guide, we hold that the complaint stated a cause of action.

We point out that we are not here concerned with the proof of appellant’s complaint. Therefore, appellee’s reliance upon Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc.1 and Rowland v. Ewell2 is not well placed because those cases deal with the proof and enforcement of oral contracts.

Reversed and remanded with directions to deny defendants’ motion to dismiss.

Reversed.

1

. FIa.1966, 190 So.2d 777.

2

. Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 78.
#### Frederick YOKUM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-590.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Bernard D. ANDERSON, as natural guardian and father of Randall Wayne Anderson, Appellant, v. Jack CONKLIN and Junior Haven, Appellees.

No. 71-546.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; John A. Miller, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33779]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (98-167)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Task Force on the Shuttle-Mir 
Rendezvous and Docking Missions; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public 
Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration announces a meeting of the NAC Task Force on the 
Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous and Docking Missions.

DATES: Wednesday, January 14, 1998, 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration, Building 1, Room 920L, Houston, TX 77058-3696.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. Dennis McSweeney, Code IH, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration, Washington, DC 20546-0001, 202/358-4556.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be open to the public up 
to the seating capacity of the room. The agenda for the meeting is as 
follows:

--Review the readiness of the STS-89 Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous and Docking 
Mission;
--Review the Task Force fact-finding meeting held at NASA Headquarters 
in Washington, DC, on December 15, 1997.

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants. Visitors 
will be requested to sign a visitors register.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
Alan M. Ladwig,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Plans.
[FR Doc. 97-33779 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
Abatement Order filed October 31, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00723

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF L .L.G., P.L.G., C.L.G ., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 05822J



### ABATEMENT ORDER
This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of the parent

- child relationship is at issue. Appellant’s brief was originally due October 18, 2016 , but it has not been filed.

On October 20, 2016, this court ordered appoin ted counsel, Stephen M.
Pierce
, to file a brief on or before October 28, 2016 . No brief was filed. Accordingly, we issue the following order. We ORDER the judge of the 315th District Court to immediately conduct a hearing to determine (1) the reason for th e failure to file a brief; (2) whether appellant desires to continue this appeal; and (3) if appellant desires to continue the appeal, adate certain when appellant’s brief will be filed. The judge shall appoint new

appellate counsel for appellant if neces sary. The judge shall see that a record of the hearing is made, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions . The transcribed record of the hearing, and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court on or before November 10, 2016

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal wil l be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appe al on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing,
the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties
of such date.

PER CURIAM
#### Carmine MARTUCCI and C & FM Construction Company, Inc., Appellants, v. LA RENAISSANCE NO. 1 CONDOMINIUM, INC., Appellee.

No. 72-339.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 21, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Diversified Futures Fund III L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      47,778,818
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  178,458<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,917,104<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,917,104<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            (1,033,483)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,449,570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,483,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,483,053)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,483,053)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $178,458.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,959,828.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $1,195,090, accrued
management fee of $125,214 and administrative expenses
payable of $69,232.
<F4>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $(3,300,101),
net change in unrealized of $189,989 and interest income of
$2,076,629.
</FN>


</TABLE>
1

16 C.F.R. Part 313, Privacy of Consumer Financial Information. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

September 10, 2004

Russell W. Schrader, Esq.

Senior Vice President and

Assistant General Counsel

Visa U.S.A. Inc.

Post Office Box 194607

San Francisco, CA 94119-4607

Re: Gateway Learning Corporation, File No. 042-3047, Docket No. C-4120

Dear Mr. Schrader:

This acknowledges your letter regarding the proposed consent order in the above-entitled

proceeding. Your letter was placed on the public record pursuant to Rule 4.9(b)(6)(ii) of the

Commission’s Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 4.9(b)(6)(ii), and was given serious consideration

by the Commission. 

Your letter, among other things, notes that the Commission’s Privacy Rule implementing

Subtitle A of Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)1

 prohibits a financial institution

from disclosing nonpublic personal information to nonaffiliated third parties other than as

described in the initial notice provided to consumers unless it provides revised privacy and optout notices to consumers and a reasonable opportunity for consumers to opt out, and consumers

do not opt out. Your letter also notes that the proposed order in Gateway Learning requires the

company to obtain the opt-in consent of consumers before applying a material change in its

privacy policy to previously collected information. Your letter requests that the Commission

make clear that the opt-in standard in the proposed order does not apply under the GLBA.

The Commission’s complaint does not allege that Gateway Learning is a financial

institution covered by the GLBA or that it violated the GLBA. Therefore, the proposed order

does not represent an interpretation of the GLBA and does not purport to alter the GLBA’s

requirements. Gateway Learning allegedly violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by

misrepresenting that it would not share personal information (including information about

children) with third parties and that it would notify consumers of changes to the privacy policy. 

Further, the Commission alleges that Gateway retroactively applied material changes to its

privacy policy to personal information collected under the earlier policy. The remedy in the

order – which requires that Gateway Learning obtain consumers’ express affirmative (“opt-in”)
consent prior to applying future material changes to previously-collected information – is

appropriate under these circumstances. 

After reviewing your comment, the Commission has determined that the public interest

would be best served by according final approval to the consent order. Thank you again for your

comment.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
<page>                                           EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley  Diversified
Futures Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.




By: /s/ Walter Davis

Name: 	 Walter Davis
Title:	 President

Date:	 March 23, 2007
EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  33-35986)  pertaining to the 1990 Stock Option Plan of NSC  Corporation
and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 6, 1998, with respect
to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and  schedule  of  NSC  Corporation
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1998

                                 Page 52 of 54
<PAGE>