alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
9623064

B224927 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

___________________________________

)

In the Matter of )

) DOCKET NO. C-3764

ALDI INC., )

a corporation )

__________________________________ )

COMPLAINT

Pursuant to the provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and

the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 41 et seq., and by virtue of the authority vested

in it by said Acts, the Federal Trade Commission, having reason to believe that Aldi Inc., a

corporation, hereinafter referred to as respondent, has violated the provisions of said Acts, and it

appearing to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be in the public

interest, hereby issues its complaint, stating its charges in that respect as follows:

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this Complaint, the following definitions are applicable. The terms

“consumer,” “consumer report,” and “consumer reporting agency” shall be defined as provided in

Sections 603(c), 603(d), and 603(f), respectively, of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§

1681a(c), 1681a(d) and 1681a(f).

PARAGRAPH ONE: Respondent Aldi Inc. is a corporation organized, existing and doing

business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, with its office and principal place

of business located at 1200 N. Kirk Road, Batavia, Illinois 60510.

PARAGRAPH TWO: Respondent, in the ordinary course and conduct of its business, has

used information in consumer reports obtained from consumer reporting agencies in the

consideration, acceptance, and denial of applicants for employment with respondent.

PARAGRAPH THREE: The acts and practices of respondent alleged in this complaint

have been in or affecting commerce, as “commerce” is defined in the Federal Trade Commission

Act.
2

PARAGRAPH FOUR: Respondent, in the ordinary course and conduct of its business,

has denied applications or rescinded offers for employment with respondent based in whole or in

part on information supplied by a consumer reporting agency, but has failed to advise consumers

that the information so supplied contributed to the adverse action taken on their applications or

offers for employment, and has failed to advise consumers of the name and address of the

consumer reporting agency that supplied the information.

PARAGRAPH FIVE: By and through the practices described in Paragraph Four,

respondent has violated the provisions of Section 615(a) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15

U.S.C. § 1681m(a).

PARAGRAPH SIX: By its aforesaid failure to comply with Section 615(a) of the Fair

Credit Reporting Act and pursuant to Section 621(a) thereof, respondent has engaged in unfair

and deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce in violation of Section 5(a)(1) of the

Federal Trade Commission Act.

WHEREFORE, THE PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Federal Trade Commission on this

fifth day of September, 1997, issues this complaint against respondent.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

SEAL
----

----

EXHIBIT (32)(a)

| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                                                         |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: October 27, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Vinod M. Khilnani                                   |   |
|                   |   | Vinod M. Khilnani                                            |   |
|                   |   | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |   |                                                         |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                    114,335
<SECURITIES>                               60,991
<RECEIVABLES>                             250,194
<ALLOWANCES>                               14,481
<INVENTORY>                               144,012
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          594,778
<PP&E>                                    638,666
<DEPRECIATION>                            464,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            839,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     373,294
<BONDS>                                   152,034
<COMMON>                                  444,935
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                               (130,949)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              839,314
<SALES>                                   227,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          327,609
<CGS>                                     156,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             320,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          3,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             5,709
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (158,917)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                4,709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.12

        

</TABLE>
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE 

USPI GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. 

2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) is entered into to be effective as of February 11, 2014 (the “Effective
Date”). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the USPI Group Holdings, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”). 

W I T N E S S E T H: 

WHEREAS, USPI Group Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), has adopted the Plan to advance the
interests of the Company by providing for the grant to Participants of Awards. 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan,
the Administrator may amend the Plan; 
 WHEREAS, Section 4(a) of the Plan initially provided that a maximum of 20,145,458
shares of Stock may delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan; 
 WHEREAS, the First Amendment to the Plan increased the
maximum shares of Stock that may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan to 20,726,523; and 
 WHEREAS, the Second
Amendment to the Plan increased the maximum shares of Stock that may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan to 26,630,457; and 

WHEREAS, the Administrator again desires to amend Section 4(a) of the Plan as set forth in this Amendment. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the Effective Date, as follows: 

1. The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: “A maximum of 27,070,457
shares of Stock may be delivered in satisfaction of Awards under the Plan.” 
 2. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Plan shall
continue to read in its current state. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the duly elected Secretary of the Company,
hereby certifies that this Amendment was adopted by the Administrator on the Effective Date. 
  

			
	USPI GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James E. Mutrie

	Name:	 	James E. Mutrie
	Title:	 	Secretary
#### Raven S. SMITH and Craig Joseph Smith, Appellants, v. Robert Earl BROTHERS et al., Appellees.

No. 73-36.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

 DCN: SE03879

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 21



LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



Unless otherwise noted, all of the entities listed below are wholly owned subsidiaries of KSwiss Inc.



|1. |  | KSwiss Pacific Inc., a Massachusetts corporation.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | KSwiss International Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Bermuda.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. |  | KS UK Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------



|4. |  | KSwiss Europe B.V., a Dutch corporation.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------



|5. |  | KSwiss S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation.
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------



|6. |  | KSwiss Australia Pty. Ltd., an Australia corporation.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------



|7. |  | KSwiss Direct Inc., a California corporation.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------



|8. |  | KSwiss Sales Corp., a Delaware corporation.
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------



|9. |  | KSwiss NS Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------



|10. |  | KSwiss Canada Corp., a Nova Scotia company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------



|11. |  | 1166789 Ontario Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------



|12. |  | KSwiss Germany GmbH, a Germany corporation.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------



|13. |  | KSwiss France SAS, a France corporation.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------



|14. |  | KSwiss S.r.l., an Italian corporation.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------



|15. |  | ERE Footwear Inc., a California corporation.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------



|16. |  | Royal Elastics LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------



|17. |  | Royal Elastics Inc., a California corporation.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>        JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>       6-MOS


<CAPTION>




                                                       EXHIBIT 27 (b)


                Crown Central Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries
                             Financial Data Schedule
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)



                                                    Six Months Ended
                                                     June 30, 1998
                                                    ----------------
<S>                                                 <C>
<CASH>                                                  $ 6,981
<SECURITIES>                                             23,883
<RECEIVABLES>                                            78,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (607)
<INVENTORY>                                             130,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        251,625
<PP&E>                                                  645,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                          351,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          590,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   194,040
<BONDS>                                                 130,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 50,355
<OTHER-SE>                                              141,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            590,914
<SALES>                                                 666,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        666,793
<CGS>                                                   616,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           616,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         69,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        7,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (24,367)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (8,473)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (15,894)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (15,894)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (1.62)




</TABLE>
CKH-12.31.2013-Ex 10.27






Exhibit 10.27
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
Directors who are not officers of SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $52,000 and $2,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend via telephone and $4,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend in person.
Each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company is also granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Holding Inc.'s 2007 Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.29 to the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Airspace Docket No. 96-AWP-35]


Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Fallbrook, CA; 
Correction

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects an error in the airspace description and 
allows for an extension of the comment period of a proposed notice of 
rulemaking that was published in the Federal Register on January 8, 
1997, Airspace Docket No. 96-AWP-35.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 11, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Buck, Airspace Specialist, 
Operations Branch, AWP-530, Air Traffic Division, Western-Pacific 
Region, Federal Aviation Administration, 15000 Aviation Boulevard, 
Lawndale, California, 90261, telephone (310) 725-6556.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    Federal Register Document 97-395, Airspace Docket No. 96-AWP-35, 
published on January 8, 1997, (62 FR 1072), revised the description of 
the Class E airspace area at Fallbrook, CA. An error was discovered in 
the airspace description for the Fallbrook, CA, Class E airspace area. 
This action corrects that error and extends the comment period until 
March 11, 1997.

Corrections to Proposed Notice of Rulemaking

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the 
airspace description for the Class E airspace area at Fallbrook CA, as 
published in the Federal Register on January 8, 1997 (62 FR 1072), 
(Federal Register Document 97-395); page 1073, column 1 is corrected as 
follows:


Sec. 71.1  [Corrected]

    By removing ``(Paragraph 6004  Class E airspace areas designated as 
an extension to a Class D or Class E surface area)'' and substituting 
``(Paragraph 6005  Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 
feet or more above the surface of the earth).''
* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Fallbrook, CA [Corrected]

Fallbrook Community Airpark, CA
    (Lat. 33 deg.21'15'' N, long. 117 deg.15'03'' W)

    On page 1073, in the first column, the airspace description for 
Fallbrook, CA, is corrected to read as follows:
    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface 
within a 6-mile radius of the Fallbrook Community Airpark and within 
4 miles west and 5.3 miles east of the 014 deg. bearing from the 
Fallbrook Community Airpark, extending from the 6-mile radius to 
20.5 miles north of the airport, excluding the portion within the 
Camp Pendleton, CA, Class E airspace area.
* * * * *
    Issued in Los Angeles, California, on February 7, 1997.
Michael Lammes,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Western-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 97-3508 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

February 28, 1997

Mark Leddy, Esquire

David I. Gelfand, Esquire

Steven J. Kaiser, Esquire

Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton

1752 N Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20036

Re: Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial Ceramics Corporation, Docket No. C-3673

Dear Messrs Leddy, Gelfand and Kaiser:

This letter responds to the "Petition of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain for Approval of

Proposed Divestiture" ("Petition") that you filed on January 3, 1997, seeking prior approval by

the Federal Trade Commission of the divestiture by Saint-Gobain of the "Igniters Business" to

Graphite Sales, Inc. The order in Docket No. C-3673 requires prior Commission approval of the

divestiture by Saint-Gobain.

The Commission has determined to approve Saint-Gobain’s proposed divestiture. In

according its approval, the Commission has relied upon the information submitted and

representations made by Saint-Gobain and Graphite Sales in connection with the Petition and the

proposed divestiture, and has assumed them to be accurate and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date. 

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 JUDY ANAYA,

8 Plaintiff-Appellant,

9 v. No. 29,437

10 PATRICIA OWENS d/b/a ADVANTAGE

11 REAL ESTATE LTD., FRANK CARBAJAL,

12 EDUARDO GARCIA, ROLAND PADILLA,

13 CHRIS GALOW, HOLLY GALOW, AND 

14 DESERI A. SICHLER, Individually and as an

15 Agent for Advantage Real Estate, 

16 Defendants-Appellees,

17 and

18 PATRICIA OWENS d/b/a ADVANTAGE

19 REAL ESTATE LTD.,

20 Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

21 v.

22 LOS LUNAS COMMUNITY PROGRAM,

23 Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

24 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF VALENCIA COUNTY

25 John W. Pope, District Judge
2

1 Narciso Garcia, Jr.

2 Albuquerque, NM

3 for Appellant

4 Allen, Shepherd, Lewis, Syra & Chapman, PA

5 Edward W. Shepherd

6 Albuquerque, NM

7 for Appellees Sichler, Owens, and Advantage

8 Doughty & West PA

9 Robert M. Doughty

10 Albuquerque, NM 

11 for Appellees Galow, Padilla, Garcia and Carbajal

12 MEMORANDUM OPINION

13 VIGIL, Judge.

14 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

15 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

16 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

17 AFFIRMED.

18 IT IS SO ORDERED.

19 ________________________________

20 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 

21 WE CONCUR:

22 ________________________________

23 ROBERT E. ROBLES, Judge
3

1 ________________________________

2 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 5, 2012 

d0227 

Order 

 

March 5, 2012 

144510 & (26)(27)(28) 

HARVEY GROESBECK, Individually, and 

as Guardian of LORETTA GROESBECK, 

a protected person, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144510 

 COA: 307069 

Macomb CC: 2009-003523-NO 

HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, d/b/a 

HENRY FORD BI-COUNTY HOSPITAL, 

d/b/a HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL, 

d/b/a THE DETROIT OSTEOPATHIC 

HOSPITAL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2012 and December 15, 2011 orders 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay and 

motion for peremptory reversal are DENIED.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134514 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134514 

 COA: 268040 

Oakland CC: 2005-203022-FC 

JEFFREY LAMONT AARON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[File No. 500-1]


Twenty First Century Health, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

February 10, 1997.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of adequate and accurate current information concerning the 
securities of Twenty First Century Health, Inc. (``TFCH''), of Las 
Vegas, Nevada. Questions have been raised about publicly-disseminated 
information concerning, among other things: (1) TFCH's financial 
condition; (2) the existence, effectiveness, and marketability of a 
medical device for testing blood sugar purportedly licensed by TFCH; 
(3) the size of the market for that device; and (4) the ownership, 
value, and business of certain companies purportedly acquired by TFCH.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:00 a.m. EST, February 10, 
1997 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on February 24, 1997.

    By the Commission.
Margaret H. McFarland,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3625 Filed 2-10-97; 12:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M