alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7101 

To provide for the continuation of paid parental leave for members of the 

Armed Services in the event of the death of the child. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2020 

Mr. HURD of Texas (for himself and Mrs. DAVIS of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the continuation of paid parental leave for 

members of the Armed Services in the event of the 

death of the child. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elaine M. Checketts 

5 Military Families Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE UPON 

7 DEATH OF CHILD. 

8 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall amend 

10 the regulations prescribed pursuant to subsections (i) and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7101 IH

1 (j) of section 701 of title 10, United States Code, to pro2 vide that the eligibility of primary and secondary care3 givers for paid parental leave that has already been ap4 proved shall not terminate upon the death of the child for 

5 whom such leave is taken. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


CAPRICOR, INC.


2006 STOCK OPTION PLAN


(Adopted February 12, 2014)


 


Capricor Therapeutics,
Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Capricor, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan, effective as of June 28, 2006
(the “Plan”), and, pursuant to Section 5.3 of the Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”)
may, at any time and from time to time, amend, suspend or terminate the Plan as to any shares of Stock as to which Options have
not been granted.


 


The
Board desires to adopt an amendment to the Plan to: (1) change the name of the Plan from the “Capricor, Inc. 2006 Stock Option
Plan” to the “Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan”; (2) provide that all references to the “Company”
shall be deemed to refer to Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. and its parent and Subsidiaries, as applicable; and (3) provide that all
references in the Plan to “Stock” shall mean the common stock of Capricor Therapeutics, Inc., par value $0.001 per
share.


 


The
Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


		1.	The name of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



 


“Capricor Therapeutics,
Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan”


 


		2.	The first sentence of the preamble is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



 


“Capricor Therapeutics,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), sets forth herein the terms of its 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”),
as follows:”


 


		3.	Section 2.7 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:



 


““Company”
means Capricor Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its parent (as that term is defined in Code Section 424(e)) and
Subsidiaries, as applicable, or any successor thereto.”


 


		4.	For purposes of clarity, all references in the Plan to “Stock” shall be deemed to mean
the common stock of the Company.



 


		5.	The modifications set forth above shall not affect any other provisions of the Plan.



 


[Signature provided on following page.]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


In
Witness Whereof, the undersigned adopts this First Amendment to the Plan on behalf of the Company as of the date first
written above.


 


 


	 	CAPRICOR THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ Linda Marbán, Ph.D.
	 	 
	 	By: Linda Marbán, Ph.D.
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer
STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

State of Connecticut

&

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement &

Order No. 8288

Modification I

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Dominion Nuclear

Connecticut, Inc. (Respondent) having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading

Agreement and Order 8288 issued on April 22, 20 I0, do now, by mutual agreement, modify said

Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

1. Delete paragraph B.14 and substitute the following therefore:

Reporting: No later than March I of every year after issuance ofthis Trading Agreement

and Order, the Respondent shall submit to the Commissioner a written report containing

copies of all ofthe records required pursuant to Paragraph B.12 ofthis Trading Agreement

and Order. The Commissioner may prescribe the forms to be used for the submission of

these reports. The Respondent shall submit these reports on such forms, if prescribed by

the Commissioner.

2. Change the permit number for the electromotive emergency engine listed in Table 2 from

199-00 I0 to 199-00 I7.

All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8288 issued by the

Commissioner acting under Chapter 446c, Sections 22a-6, 22a- I71, 22a-174, 22a- I76, and 22a- I77

ofthe Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127

www.ct.gov/dcp

An Equal Opportunity Employer
IDominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. 2 Trading Agreement

and Order No. 8288

Modification I

Name:

l}espondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and

<Drder without further notice.

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc.

Signature: _-'.~L~~~~~~~::::====:::-..... _

leaHAILlJ k. ~U5

Title:

'" . 'Sr.'/ _ ... V"--,-r-,,U'i=-en>~-=-I!.-=--__AJ--=-__<- _

Date: -_-J-~-f-6-""~='il-/.....,Z£>=-!-1~\) _

Issued as a modification of an Order of the Commissioner of Environmental Protection

qa~~. R~; Director

Engmeering & Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

qITY OF WATERFORD

MAILED CERTIFIED MAIL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

1

Certified Document No.

/0 - J2. - J.o/O

Date
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3629]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 which provides opportunity for 
public comment on new or revised data collections, the Railroad 
Retirement Board (RRB) will publish periodic summaries of proposed data 
collections.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed information 
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information has practical utility; 
(b) the accuracy of the RRB's estimate of the burden of the collection 
of the information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize 
the burden related to the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.
    Title and purpose of information collection: Employer's Deemed 
Service Month Questionnaire; OMB 3220-0156. Under Section 3(i) of the 
Railroad Retirement Act (RRA), the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) may 
deem additional months of service in cases where an employee does not 
actually work in every month of the year. The RRB utilizes Form GL-99, 
Employers Deemed Services Month Questionnaire, to obtain service and 
compensation information from railroad employers needed to determine if 
an employee can be credited with additional deemed months of railroad 
service. Completion is mandatory. One response is required for each RRB 
inquiry.
    No changes are proposes to Form GL-99. The completion time for the 
GL-99 is estimated at 2 minutes per response. The RRB estimates that 
approximately 4,000 responses are received annually.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR COMMENTS: To request more information or to 
obtain a copy of the information collection justification, forms, and/
or supporting material, please call the RRB Clearance Officer at (312) 
751-3363. Comments regarding the information collection should be 
addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 North 
Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092. Written comments should be 
received within 60 days of this notice.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3629 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn . Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (201 4 ). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A14
- 2103

In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. N. K., Child.

Filed July 13 , 2015 Affirmed Kirk , Judge Todd County District Court File No. 77

- JV

- 14

- 865
Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Susan J. Andrews, Assistant Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant J.N.K.) Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and Chad M. Larson, Douglas County Attorney , Michelle L. Clark, Assistant County Attorney, Alexandria, Minnesota (for respondent S tate of Minnesota )
Considered and decided by Connolly , Presiding Judge; Kirk , Judge; and Smith , Judge

. U N P U B L I S H E D O P I N I O N
KIRK , Judge Juvenile appeals his delinquency adjudication for second

- degree c riminal sexual conduct, arguing that the district court erred in finding that he acted with sexual intent. We affirm

.2 D E C I S I O N In a delinquency adjudication, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt “every fact necessary to constitute the charged crime.” In re Welfare of S.M.J. , 556 N.W.2d 4, 6 (Minn. App. 1996). We are limited to ascertaining whether, given the facts and legitimate inferences, a fact

- finder could re asonably determine that each of the elements of the delinquency petition has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In re Welfare of T.N.Y. , 632 N.W.2d 765, 768 (Minn. App. 2001). We view the record in the light most favorable to the adjudication and ass ume that the fact

- finder believed the testimony supporting the adjudication and disbelieved all contrary evidence. S.M.J. , 556 N.W.2d at 6

. Viewing the record in the light most favorable to adjudication, we conclude that J.N.K.’s argument that he acted w ithout sexual intent when he sat on the couch next to his eight

- year - old cousin , lifted up her arms, unbuttoned her pants, reached into her pants , and “inappropriately” touched her vaginal area is without merit. T he circumstances proved are consistent wit h guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except guilt. See State v. Palmer , 803 N.W.2d 727, 733 (Minn. 2011) (providing the test for circumstantial evidence, like intent)

. The nature of the touching precludes any “ possibility of an innocent explanation such as accidental touching , ” and no innocent explanation was asserted by
J.N.K. See State v. Vick , 632 N.W.2d 676, 691 (Minn. 2001). When asked if he had touched other girls the same way, he replied “ [ m ] y girlfriend , ” which further indicates that he knew he was engaging in an act consistent with a sexual relationship. Affirmed.
y X β ε y X β ε I n I n

y ε ψ ψ βε I

ˆ β X Ψ X X Ψ y Ψ Ψ Ψ V

y x x ˆ β V Ψ y X ˆ

β

ˆ β y x y x
y x y Ψ V Ψ V x V Ψ X X Ψ X x X Ψ Vˆ Ψ ˆ Ψ

ˆ Ψ y Ψ Ψ
ˆ Ψ ˆ

Ψ Ψ

ˆ Ψ ˆ Ψˆ β x y

R y xCorrected Prediction Limits Watson et al. Prediction Limits

10/1/05 2/1/06 6/1/06 10/1/06 2/1/07 6/1/07−0.2 0 0.2 0.4Post−Treamtent Innovations

Post−Treatment Time Periody x y Ψ y x y ˆ Ψ Ψ

y ˆ Ψ y y Ψ y y ˆ Ψ y Ψ y ˆ Ψ y ˆ Ψ y y Ψ y

y ˆ Ψ y Ψ

ˆ Ψ Ψ y Ψ y y ˆ Ψ y y ˆ

Ψ y Ψy ˆ Ψ y y Ψ y ˆ

Ψ ˆ Ψ ˆ Ψ ˆ Ψ y ˆ Ψ y Ψ ˆ

Ψ y Ψ Ψ ˆ

Ψ
ˆ Ψ Ψ

ˆ Ψ ˆ

ΨC opy r i gh to f H yd r o l og i cal S c i e n ce s J ou r n a l/J ou r n a l d e s S c i e n ce s H yd r o l og i qu e s is t h e p r op ert y o f Ta y l o r & Fra n c is L t d a nd its c on t e n t m a y no tb e c op i e d o r e m a il e d t o mu lti p l e sit e s o r po st e d t o a lists er v w it hou t th e c opy r i gh t ho l d er ' s e xp re ss wr itt e n p er missi on. H o we v er , u s er s m a y p r i n t , do w n l o a d, o r e m a il arti c l e s f o r i nd i v i du a l u s e .
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Submission for OMB Review, Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title and Associated Forms: Custody and Control of Unaccompanied 
Housing Rooms and Furnishings; AF Forms 228 and 191.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Number of Respondents: 20,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 20,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 5,000.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is necessary to meet 
the requirements of Air Force Instruction 32-6005, Unaccompanied 
Housing Management and Operations. The information collected hereby, 
will provide the necessary data for responsible Air Force officials to 
manage and control unaccompanied housing rooms and furnishings, and to 
effect assignment and termination thereto.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; Business or other for-
profit; Not-for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. William Pearce.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Pearce, WHS/DIOR, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: January 3, 1997.
L. M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-433 Filed 1-8-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-04-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-02-1999             
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-03-1998       
<PERIOD-END>                                  APR-04-1998       
<CASH>                                          3,323,655       
<SECURITIES>                                    1,617,630       
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,190,801       
<ALLOWANCES>                                      237,160       
<INVENTORY>                                     4,855,988       
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               15,178,847       
<PP&E>                                          5,830,274       
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,299,461       
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 21,983,810       
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,235,514       
<BONDS>                                                 0       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0       
<PREFERRED>                                             0       
<COMMON>                                          694,906       
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,346,699       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   21,893,810       
<SALES>                                        12,649,704       
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12,649,704       
<CGS>                                           9,663,191       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,243,809       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   14,000       
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  3,324       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,391,895       
<INCOME-TAX>                                      512,000       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               879,895       
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0       
<CHANGES>                                               0       
<NET-INCOME>                                      879,895       
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0.30       
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.28       
                                            


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




In
connection with the quarterly report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark A.
Zorko, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that to my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Mark A. ZorkoName:  
      Mark A. ZorkoTitle:   
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:   
      December 14, 2009






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Linda DICKERSON.

No. 61006.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Linda Dickerson, applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Writ denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification of Interim President, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

and Item 307 of Regulation S-K



I, David Pollock, certify that:

1.
        I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Hydron Technologies, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2008;


2.
        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.
        I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:


(a)
        designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)
        evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)
        disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and


5.
        I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)
        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)
        any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.




/s/ David PollockDavid PollockChief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer




June 13, 2008

---
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3663]



[[Page 6800]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service


Mojave National Preserve Advisory Commission; Meetings

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that meetings of the Mojave National Preserve Advisory 
Commission will be held March 10 and 11, 1997; assemble at 1 p.m., 
March 10, 1997, at the AVI Hotel located between Laughlin, Nevada and 
Stateline, CA.
    The agenda: Mojave National Preserve Update; Project Update 
Northern and Eastern Mojave Planning; Discussion of Preserve and 
Wilderness Boundary Revisions; Presentation of burro census findings; 
and Mojave National Preserve General Management Plan Alternatives.
    The Advisory Commission was established by Pub. L. 03-433 to 
provide for the advice on the development and implementation of the 
General Management Plan.
    Members of the Commission are:

Micheal Attaway
Irene Ausmus
Rob Blair
Peter Burk
Dennis Casebier
Donna Davis
Nathan `Levi' Esquerra
Gerald Freeman
Willis Herron
Eldon Hughes
Claudia Luke
Clay Overson
Norbert Riedy
Mal Wessel
Kathy Davis

    This meeting is open to the public.
Mary G. Martin,
Superintendent, Mojave National Preserve.
[FR Doc. 97-3663 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-P
254 La. 844

#### Liston BROWN, as administrator of the Estate of Michael Brown v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA.

No. 50097.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: City of Alexandria applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 225 So.2d 157; 226 So.2d 600.

The application is denied. On the facts of the case as found by the court of appeal there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.