alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                      Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc.
                              List of Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

          Entity                     State of Incorporation    DBA
          ------                     ----------------------    ---
<S>                                  <C>                       <C>
Santa Barbara Restaurant Group       Delaware                  N/A
Timber Lodge Steakhouse, Inc.        Minnesota                 Timber Lodge Steakhouse
JB's Family Restaurants, Inc.        Delaware                  JB's Restaurant, Galaxy Diner
JB Parent Corp.                      Delaware                  JB's Restaurant, Galaxy Diner &
                                                                  Timber Lodge Steakhouse
GB Franchise Corporation             California                Green Burrito
Green Burrito, Inc.                  California                Green Burrito
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7420 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7420

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the membership of the 
  Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans to include veterans who are 
             lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2020

  Ms. DelBene (for herself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. 
 Lynch, Ms. Norton, Mr. Swalwell of California, Mr. Cox of California, 
  Ms. Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Cisneros, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Cooper, Mr. 
Kennedy, Mr. Thompson of California, Ms. Moore, Ms. Eshoo, Ms. Judy Chu 
 of California, Mr. Yarmuth, Mrs. Davis of California, Mrs. Hayes, Mr. 
 Garcia of Illinois, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Horsford, Mr. Lujan, Mr. Panetta, 
Mr. Beyer, Ms. Speier, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Lowey, Ms. Houlahan, Mr. Carson 
of Indiana, Mr. Meeks, Mr. Himes, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Miss Rice of 
 New York, Ms. Blunt Rochester, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Heck, Ms. 
  Jayapal, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Mr. Ryan, Ms. Wexton, Ms. Schrier, Ms. 
   Porter, and Mr. Quigley) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the membership of the 
  Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans to include veterans who are 
             lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Voices for Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF MEMBERSHIP OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MINORITY 
              VETERANS TO INCLUDE VETERANS WHO ARE LESBIAN, GAY, 
              BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, OR QUEER.

    (a) Expansion of Membership.--Subsection (a)(2)(A) of section 544 
of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (iv), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in clause (v), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following new 
        clauses:
            ``(vi) veterans who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, 
        transgender, or queer''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Clause (vi) of section 544(a)(2)(A) of title 
38, United States Code, shall apply to appointments made on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
January 27 , 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FREDERICK ONFRI , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00596

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EX-4.1



 



 
 ARHAUS, INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 04035M 10 2 THIS
CERTIFIES THAT BY is the owner of AMERICAN ( Brooklyn, COUNTERSIGNED FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF New STOCK AND ARHAUS, INC. York) transferable on the
books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned COMMON and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. TRANSFER &
REGISTERED: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. TRUST Dated: COMPANY AUTHORIZED AND TRANSFER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
SIGNATURE REGISTRAR AGENT 







 



 
 THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF
SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND
DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED TO BE
ISSUED. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: UTMA Custodian TEN COM as tenants in common
(Cust) (Minor) TENENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the
above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital
stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE
SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION
PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

d0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138846 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138846 

 COA: 281048 

Saginaw CC: 06-028176-FC 

ANTHONY BARNETT LEE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Global Technologies Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Samuel E. Park, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 that to my knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.



                                           /s/ Samuel E. Park
                                          -------------------------
                                          Name: Samuel E. Park
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          Date: June 23, 2003






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Del Global Technologies Corp and will be retained by Del Global
Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40982 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus PAUL JOE MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-14-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Paul Joe Martin raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Daugherty , 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
    Percentage of VotingName of Company
    
    State of Incorporation
    
    Equity Interests OwnedArtesian Resources Corporation
    
    DelawareArtesian Water Company, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    

100Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc.
    
    Pennsylvania
    
100Artesian Development Corporation
    
    Delaware
    
100Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
100Artesian Utility Development, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
100AquaStructure Delaware, L.L.C.
    
    Delaware
    
33 1/3
 
 Balance at
    
    
    Charged to
    
    
    Charged
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Balance atBeginning Of
    
    
    Costs and
    
    
    to Other
    
    
    
    
    
    
    End ofAdditions
    
    Period
    
    
    Expenses
    
    
    Accounts
    
    
    Deductions
    
    
    PeriodClassificationFor the Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets
    
    $
    323,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    202,000
    
    
    $
    121,000For the Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets
    
    $
    482,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    159,000
    
    
    $
    323,000For the Year
Ended December 31, 2004 Valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets
    
    $
    512,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    30,000
    
    
    $
    482,000
 78
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50605

Conference Calendar

 

MICHAEL KYLE BROOKS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KEN ODEN, Travis County Prosecutor; 

AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT; STAN KNEE,

Stan Knee - Austin Police Department,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-00-CV-250-SS

- - - - - - - - - -

April 10, 2001

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Kyle Brooks appeals the district court’s dismissal

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. 

The district court concluded that Brooks’s claims against judges,

prosecutors, and police officers were barred by immunity, and

that Brooks’s apparent attempt to relitigate the propriety of his

underlying conviction or obtain damages for prosecutorial

misconduct was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 489

(1994). The court therefore dismissed the complaint. This was
No. 00-50605

-2-

not error. See Black v. Warren, 134 F.3d 732, 734 (5th Cir.

1998). 

Brooks’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. Brooks is cautioned that the filing of further

frivolous lawsuits, pleadings, or other documents in this court

will result in the imposition of sanctions. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I
Charles J. Hinkaty, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Charles J. Hinkaty
----------------------
Charles J. Hinkaty
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2005
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7244 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for purposes of the tax 

on private foundation excess business holdings to treat as outstanding 

any employee-owned stock purchased by a business enterprise pursuant 

to certain employee stock ownership retirement plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. DIAZ-BALART (for himself and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for purposes 

of the tax on private foundation excess business holdings 

to treat as outstanding any employee-owned stock purchased by a business enterprise pursuant to certain employee stock ownership retirement plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7244 IH

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PURCHASES OF EMPLOYEE-OWNED 

2 STOCK DISREGARDED FOR PURPOSES OF 

3 FOUNDATION TAX ON EXCESS BUSINESS 

4 HOLDINGS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4943(c)(4)(A) of the In6 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(v) For purposes of clause (i), subpara9 graph (D), and paragraph (2), any voting stock 

10 which— 

11 ‘‘(I) is not readily tradable on an es12 tablished securities market, 

13 ‘‘(II) is purchased by the business en14 terprise on or after January 1, 2005, from 

15 an employee stock ownership plan (as de16 fined in section 4975(e)(7)) in which em17 ployees of such business enterprise partici18 pate, in connection with a distribution 

19 from such plan, and 

20 ‘‘(III) is held by the business enter21 prise as treasury stock, cancelled, or re22 tired, 

23 shall be treated as outstanding voting stock, but 

24 only to the extent so treating such stock would 

25 not result in permitted holdings exceeding 49 

26 percent (determined without regard to this 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7244 IH

1 clause). The preceding sentence shall not apply 

2 with respect to the purchase of stock from a 

3 plan during the 10-year period beginning on the 

4 date the plan is established.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act and to pur9 chases by a business enterprise of voting stock in 

10 taxable years beginning before, on, or after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act. 

12 (2) SPECIAL RULE FOR GRANDFATHERED

13 FOUNDATIONS IN CASE OF DECREASE IN OWNER14 SHIP BY REASON OF PRE-ENACTMENT PUR15 CHASES.—Section 4943(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Internal 

16 Revenue Code of 1986 shall not apply with respect 

17 to any decrease in the percentage of holdings in a 

18 business enterprise by reason of the application of 

19 section 4943(c)(4)(A)(v) of such Code (as added by 

20 this section). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. 10002.

#### Charles *v.*Fawley et al.

Decided February 25, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Highland county.

*Mr. L. R. Duckwall*and *Mr. Henry M. Huggins,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. Frank Wilson,*for ‘defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrants' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
February 22, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-22-1998
<CASH>                                          32,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  226,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,491
<INVENTORY>                                    291,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               618,470
<PP&E>                                       1,148,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                 558,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,426,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          354,658
<BONDS>                                        359,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,940
<OTHER-SE>                                     586,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,426,914
<SALES>                                        802,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               802,621
<CGS>                                          615,702
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  615,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               137,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,995
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
#### Charles W. CLAYTON, Jr., and W. Malcolm Clayton d/b/a Claytons’ Realty, Petitioners, v. Oliver A. NANTELL and Aileen Nantell, his wife, Respondents.

No. 70-751.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Ordered that respondents’ motion to quash, filed September 24, 1970, is hereby-granted and the petition for certiorari, filed September 11, 1970, is hereby quashed; further,

Ordered that respondents’ motion to advance the cause, filed September 24, 1970, is hereby moot.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.60

                           Nexell Therapeutics Inc.
                                   9 Parker
                           Irvine, California 92618

                                                          As of May 25, 1999
Eric A. Rose, MD
----------------
----------------
Re:  Amendment to November 17, 1995 Consulting and Stock Option Agreement
     --------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr. Rose:

     This letter constitutes an amendment to the Consulting and Stock Option
Agreement dated as of November 17, 1995 (the "Option Agreement") between you and
Nexell Therapeutics Inc. (formerly named VIMRx Pharmaceuticals Inc.) as follows:

     In consideration of your willingness to extend your consulting services for
a period of three years, the parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the
expiration date of the "Option" (as each of those terms is defined in the Option
Agreement) is extended from November 16, 2000 to November 16, 2003, subject to
approval by the Company's shareholders as required by rules of The NASDAQ Stock
Market, Inc.  In addition, you shall be entitled to a "cashless exercise"
provision consistent with the cashless exercise provision authorized under the
Company's 1997 Incentive and Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan.

     Except as expressly set forth herein, the Option Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

     Please sign below in the space provided to signify your consent to the
foregoing amendment.

                                Very truly yours,

                                NEXELL THERAPEUTICS INC.

                                By:  /s/ Richard L. Dunning
                                     -------------------------------
                                     Richard L. Dunning
                                     Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                     Executive Officer

I hereby acknowledge and agree to the foregoing amendment.

/s/ Eric A. Rose, MD
------------------------
Eric A. Rose, MD