alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                              58
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      987
<ALLOWANCES>                                        11
<INVENTORY>                                        844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1954
<PP&E>                                            3151
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1213
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1754
<BONDS>                                           1163
<COMMON>                                           592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5235
<SALES>                                           3940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3940
<CGS>                                             3532
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     96
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 69
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        69
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2548 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2548

 To enact as law certain regulations relating to the taking of double-
                          crested cormorants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2021

Mr. Guest (for himself and Mr. Crawford) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To enact as law certain regulations relating to the taking of double-
                          crested cormorants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cormorant Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE TAKING OF DOUBLE-CRESTED 
              CORMORANTS.

    (a) Force and Effect.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to subsection (b), sections 21.47 
        and 21.48 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (as in 
        effect on January 1, 2016), shall have the force and effect of 
        law.
            (2) Public notice.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting 
        through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
        Service (referred to in this section as the ``Secretary''), 
        shall notify the public of the authority provided by paragraph 
        (1) in a manner determined to be appropriate by the Secretary.
    (b) Sunset.--The authority provided by subsection (a)(1) shall 
terminate on the effective date of a regulation promulgated by the 
Secretary after the date of enactment of this Act to control 
depredation of double-crested cormorant populations.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section limits the 
authority of the Secretary to promulgate regulations relating to the 
taking of double-crested cormorants under any other law.
                                 <all>
```
258 La. 584

#### STATE of Louisiana, ex rel. Benjamin C. LOFTON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 51389.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1971.

In re: Benjamin C. Lofton applying for writ of review.

Writ denied. Showing made does not justify the exercise of our jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

dissents from the refusal of the writ and will assign written reasons.

BARHAM, Justice, is of the opinion the writ should be granted.

The record before us reflects absolutely that the defendant pleaded guilty without benefit of counsel. The minutes do not show waiver of counsel. Under Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 82 SCt. 884, 8 L.Ed. 2d 70 (1962), it was found that that record did not show that the trial judge offered and the petitioner declined counsel. The conclusion in Carnley was: “Presuming waiver from a silent record is impermissible. The record must show, or there must be an allegation and evidence which show, that an accused was offered counsel but intelligently and understanding^ rejected the offer. Anything less is not waiver.” 8 L.Ed.2d at p. 77.

In the case before us the minutes are silent as to whether defendant was offered counsel and waived counsel. Moreover, the majority of our court for the purpose of considering this writ have acknowledged *that even considering the evidentiary hearing,*the defendant was not offered counsel and did not waive counsel at the plea of guilty. The plea of guilty is a critical stage of the proceedings, and a plea could not have been entered without waiver of counsel.
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and
appoints  Jerry C. Moyes and William F. Riley,  III, and each of them,  her true
and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent  with full  power of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for  her  and in her  name,  place  and  stead,  in any and all
capacities,  to sign the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December 31, 1996,  for filing with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission by
Swift Transportation Co., Inc., a Nevada corporation,  together with any and all
amendments  to such Form 10-K,  and to file the same with all exhibits  thereto,
and all  documents in connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission,  granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and  purposes as she might or could do in person,  hereby  ratifying
and confirming all that such  attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         DATED: February 17, 1997


                                       /s/ A. E. Frei
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Alphonse E. Frei


STATE OF ARIZONA                    )
                                    ) ss.
County of Maricopa                  )


         On this 7th day of March,  1997,  before  me,  the  undersigned  Notary
Public, personally appeared Alphonse E. Frei, known to me to be the person whose
name is subscribed to the within  instrument and acknowledged  that  he executed
the same for the purposes therein contained.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.


                                       /s/ Anne Tanner
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Notary Public


My commission expires:
April 30, 1999
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7102 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 1999 with respect 

to exemptions from certain motor carrier regulations, to direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations related to agricultural commodities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2020 

Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Motor Carrier Safety Improvement Act of 

1999 with respect to exemptions from certain motor carrier regulations, to direct the Secretary of Transportation 

to issue regulations related to agricultural commodities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fixing America’s Reg5 ulatory Mess To Facilitate Agricultural Byproducts and 

6 Livestock Expedited Delivery Act’’ or the ‘‘FARM to 

7 TABLE Delivery Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7102 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL COMMOD2 ITIES AND FARM SUPPLIES. 

3 Section 229 of the Motor Carrier Safety Improve4 ment Act of 1999 (49 U.S.C. 31136 note) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ‘‘during 

6 planting and harvest periods, as determined by each 

7 State,’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (e)(8) by striking ‘‘during the 

9 planting and harvesting seasons within each State, 

10 as determined by the State, and livestock feed at 

11 any time of the year’’ and inserting ‘‘and livestock 

12 feed’’. 

13 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY. 

14 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

15 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor16 tation shall issue such regulations as are necessary to 

17 amend the definition of agricultural commodity consistent 

18 with this section. 

19 (b) DEFINITION OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITY.— 

20 In this section, the term ‘‘agricultural commodity’’ 

21 means— 

22 (1) any product planted or harvested for food, 

23 feed, fuel, or fiber; 

24 (2) any non-human living animals (including 

25 fish, insets, and livestock as defined in section 602 

26 of the Emergency Livestock Feed Assistance Act of 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7102 IH

1 1988 (7 U.S.C. 1471)) and the products thereof, in2 cluding milk, eggs, and honey; 

3 (3) agricultural aquacultural, forestry, horti4 cultural, and floricultural commodities; 

5 (4) fruits and vegetables; 

6 (5) other agricultural products that are sen7 sitive to temperature and climate and at the risk of 

8 perishing in transit; 

9 (6) animal feed (including ingredients of such 

10 feed); 

11 (7) products used during harvest and packaging 

12 prior to processing, including bins, boxes, jars, and 

13 cans; and 

14 (8) products of preservation. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Leon WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 71-134.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 9, 1971.

Habeas corpus denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7122 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide estimates of the use 

of taxpayer funds by the United States Government, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2020 

Mr. ARRINGTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide estimates 

of the use of taxpayer funds by the United States Government, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Receipt 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF TAXPAYER FUNDS. 

7 The Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary’s del8 egate, shall provide, to each individual filing a Federal in9 come tax return for a calendar year, a one-page estimate 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7122 IH

1 of how the taxpayer’s money was spent by the Government 

2 during the immediately preceding calendar year. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK126QN23PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS' CONSENT

We
consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-58684, 333-45638, 333-66065, 333-72288, 333-81430
and 333-103639 of Restoration Hardware, Inc, on Form S-8 and Registration Statements No. 333-62178, 333-70624 and 333-74668 of
Restoration Hardware, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated May 2, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
restatement described in Note 17) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Restoration Hardware, Inc. for the year ended February 1, 2003.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

San
Francisco, California
June 11, 2003

---

QuickLinks
#### STATE of Florida, Relator, v. The Honorable James M. REASBECK, as Circuit Court Judge, Broward County, Florida, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Respondent.

No. 73-1323.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1974.

Appeal dismissed.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1996
[CASH]                                         103,567
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                2,622,065
[ALLOWANCES]                                    71,000
[INVENTORY]                                  5,356,985
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               708,006
[PP&E]                                       2,619,296
[DEPRECIATION]                               1,208,416
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                              11,699,617
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                       10,409,880
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                    35,015,935
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                11,699,617
[SALES]                                     21,327,178
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                            21,327,178
[CGS]                                       21,672,654
[TOTAL-COSTS]                               26,713,480
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                             1,667,306
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                             727,912
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (7,519,238)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                               (7,519,238)
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                    (.65)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.65)
</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8069** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. OCTAVIUS S. CLINE, a/k/a Toby , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for t he District of South Carolina , at Greenville
. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 6:02

- cr - 01358

- HMH

- 12; 6:09

- cv - 70104

- HMH )

Submitted : March 30 , 2010 Decided: April 5 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismis sed by un published per curiam opinion
. Octavius S. Cline, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CUR IAM: Octavius S. Cline seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2009 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c) (1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);
Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cline has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dis pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Monticello 
Site

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) notice is hereby given of the 
following Advisory Board Committee Meeting: Environmental Management 
Site-Specific Advisory Board, Monticello Site.

Date and Time: Tuesday, February 18, 1997, 7 p.m.--9 p.m.

Address: San Juan County Courthouse, 2nd Floor Conference Room, 117 
South Main, Monticello, Utah 84535.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Berry, Public Affairs 
Specialist, Department of Energy Grand Junction Projects Office, PO Box 
2567, Grand Junction, CO, 81502 (303) 248-7727.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to advise DOE and 
its regulators in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Discussion on the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Report.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Committee either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to 
agenda items should contact Audrey Berry's office at the address or 
telephone number listed above. The Designated Federal Official is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Each individual wishing to make public 
comment will be provided a maximum of 5 minutes to present their 
comments. This notice is being published less than 15 days in advance 
of the meeting due to programmatic issues that needed to be resolved.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Freedom of Information Public Reading Room, 
1E-190, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, 
DC 20585 between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday-Friday, except Federal 
holidays. Minutes will also be available by writing to Audrey Berry, 
Department of Energy Grand Junction Projects Office, P.O. Box 2567, 
Grand Junction, CO 81502, or by calling her at (303) 248-7727.

    Issued at Washington, DC on February 12, 1997.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Acting Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3878 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00666

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v. MICHAEL ERIC RENDON
On Appeal from the 377th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 12

- 8

- 26806

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. December 4, 2014
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WHITBURN LLC, AS TRUSTEE ONLY ) UNDER THE HC14-17 LAND TRUST, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-3518 ) GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC; ERIC ) ELFTMAN; LAKE POINTE TOWNHOME ) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; ) PEBBLE CREEK HOMEOWNERS ) ASSOCIATION OF HILLSBOROUGH ) COUNTY, INC.; BANK OF AMERICA, ) N.A.; UNKNOWN TENANT I; UNKNOWN ) TENANT II; ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed September 16, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emily A. Peacock, Judge. Ivan D. Ivanov of Ivanov Wolf PLLC, Tampa, for Appellant. William L. Noriega of Padgett Law Group, Tallahassee, for Appellee Green Tree Servicing LLC N/K/A Ditech Financial LLC. Jonathan Jacobson of Aldridge | Pite, LLP, Delray Beach, for Appellee Bank of America, N.A.- 2 -

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### A. J. RICHTER & COMPANY, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Paris G. SINGER et al., Appellees.

No. 72-369.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 19, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 12, 1973.

Mallory H. Horton of Horton, Schwartz & Perse and Deutsch, Deutsch & Goldberg, Miami, for appellant.

Harry G. Carratf of Morgan, Carratt and O’Connor, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cockrell v. Taylor, 122 Fla. 798, 165 So. 887 (1936).

WALDEN, CROSS, and MAGER, JJ., concur.