alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF O'CHARLEY'S INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                           3,068
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                        87
<INVENTORY>                                      2,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,238
<PP&E>                                         174,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,809
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        65,986
<OTHER-SE>                                         406
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,782
<SALES>                                        246,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               246,046
<CGS>                                          194,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  223,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79
        

</TABLE>
#### Nathaniel B. ELKINS, Appellant, v. Frances Ruth ELKINS, Appellee.

No. 70-961.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 1, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 9, 1971.

Cushman & Cushman, Frates, Floyd, Pearson & Stewart, Miami, for appellant.

Fine, Jacobson & Block and Barry N. Semet, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After remand of a prior appeal the trial court conducted additional hearings in this proceeding. See Elkins v. Elkins, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 105. An amended final judgment was rendered which increased the alimony award to the wife from $500 to $1,500 a month. In this appeal the husband complains that the trial judge committed an abuse of discretion in awarding this amount of alimony to the wife.

Competent counsel for both sides have provided us with a plethora of facts and figures to support their positions.

We conclude from a review of the briefs and the record that the husband is financially able to maintain the wife in substantially the same manner of living which he established during their marriage.

The husband argues that he proved, without conflict or dispute, that the amount of money expended monthly to maintain the living standard of the family unit of six people during the marriage was about $2,000 per month and on that basis the wife, as one member of a family unit of six, was not entitled to $1,500 a month as alimony.

This does not take into consideration that the $2,000 dollars per month was a net amount to be used by the wife and that she will be required to pay taxes on the $1,500 per month alimony award. The record shows $2,000 per month was not used for the “sole support of the six family unit” as the two daughters of the wife by a previous marriage were receiving support from their natural father; that Leah, the daughter of the husband, received a salary from a mortgage company belonging to the husband and that this salary was used to pay her expenses, and that the mortgage company provided the wife with certain vacations and automobile expenses as well as certain insurance benefits.

We do not find that an abuse of discretion by the trial judge has been clearly shown. Poliak v. Poliak, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 771.

The amended final judgment is

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34009]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-141-000]


Texas Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 23, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 17, 1997, Texas Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Texas Gas), Post Office Box 20008, filed a request with 
the Commission in Docket No. CP98-141-000, pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(NGA) for authorization to construct a secondary meter run at its Union 
City Delivery Point in Obion County, Tennessee, authorized in blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-407-000, all as more fully set 
forth in the request on file with the Commission and open to public 
inspection.
    Texas Gas proposes to add a second 4-inch meter run at its Union 
City Delivery Point on Texas Gas's Main Line System in Obion County, 
Tennessee, in order to provide more accurate measurement at the Union 
City Delivery Point through which Texas Gas renders natural gas service 
to United Cities Gas Company for service to the City of Union City, 
Tennessee.
     Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after the 
Commission has issued this notice, file pursuant to Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene or 
notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157. 205) a protest to the request. 
If no protest is filed within the allowed time, the proposed activity 
shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day after the time 
allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not withdrawn 
within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, the instant 
request shall be treated as an application for authorization pursuant 
to Section 7 of the NGA.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34009 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
: ATTACHMENT A
Temporarily under seal in accordance with Commission Rule 4.10(g), 16 C-F.R. § 4.10(g).
No. 10530.

#### The Zanesville, Marietta & Parkersburg Railroad Co. *v.*Hughes et al.

Decided March 3, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Perry county.

*Mr. John J. Adams*and *Mr. L. A. Tussing,*for' plaintiff in error.

*Mr. H. D. Cochran; Mr. T. D. Price*and *Mr. J. A. Ivers,*for de-fendants in error.

Judgment affirmed, the question presented depending upon the weight of the evidence.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Revision of Information 
Collection: Form RI 20-63

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management will submit to the Office of Management and Budget 
a request for reclearance of the following information collection. RI 
20-63, Survivor Annuity Election for a Spouse, is an enclosure covered 
by a letter explaining why OPM is sending the form and is used by the 
Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) to provide information and a 
survivor benefits election opportunity to annuitants who have notified 
the CSRS that they have married.
    There are estimated to be 2,400 respondents for RI 20-63 and 200 
for the cover letter. It is estimated to take 45 minutes to complete 
the form with a burden of 1,800 hours and 10 minutes to complete the 
letter, which gives a burden of 34 hours. The total burden for RI 20-63 
is 1,834 hours.
    Comments are particularly invited on:

--whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper 
performance of functions of the Office of Personnel Management, and 
whether it will have practical utility;
--whether our estimate of the public burden of this collection of 
information is accurate, and based on valid assumptions and 
methodology; and
--ways in which we can minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond, through the use of appropriate 
technological collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.

    For copies of this proposal, contact Jim Farron on (202) 418-3208, 
or E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4aea9a2a5b6b6abaa84a9a5ada8eaabb4a9eaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="157f78737467677a7b5578747c793b7a65783b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received by March 2, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief, 
Operations Support Division, Retirement and Insurance Service, U.S. 
Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW, Room 3349, 
Washington, DC 20415-0001.

FOR INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION--CONTACT: Mary 
Beth Smith-Toomey, Budget & Administrative Service Division, (202) 606-
0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Janice R. Lachance,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-33880 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/d07b1474/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

Crown Castle International Corp. 

Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation 

Initial Equity Grant. Each newly appointed or elected non-employee director is granted, pursuant to the Crown Castle
International Corp. (“Company”) 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, a number of unrestricted shares of common stock of the Company (“Common Stock”) having a valuation equal to approximately $90,000, valued at the per share
closing price of the Common Stock as of the effective date of the director’s appointment or election. 
 Annual Equity Grant.
At the Board’s first regularly scheduled meeting of each year, each non-employee director is granted shares of Common Stock having a valuation equal to approximately $125,000 ($200,000 in the case of the Chairman of the Board), valued at
the per share closing price of the Common Stock as of the date of such Board meeting. On February 20, 2014, the Board granted (1) 1,638 shares of Common Stock (priced at $76.29, the closing price of the Common Stock on February 20,
2014) to each non-employee director of the Board, other than J. Landis Martin and (2) 2,621 shares of Common Stock (priced at $76.29, the closing price of the Common Stock on February 20, 2014) to J. Landis Martin for service as
non-employee Chairman of the Board. 
 Retainers. Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer, paid in quarterly
installments, of $75,000 (plus an additional (1) $20,000 for the Chair of the Audit Committee, (2) $15,000 for the Chair of the Compensation Committee, (3) $10,000 for the Chair of each of the Nominating & Corporate
Governance Committee and Strategy Committee, and (3) $5,000 for each member of the Audit Committee other than the Chair), and reimbursement of reasonable incidental expenses. 

Other Benefits. Each non-employee director is eligible to participate, at such director’s cost and election, in the
Company’s medical and dental plans. 
 Employee Directors. A director who is also an employee of the Company receives no
additional compensation for services as a director.
### Page 1

### of2

Janet Travis From: "Patricia Mariella"<Patricia.Mariella@gric.nsn.us> To: '"Janet Travis"' <jtravis@gilanet.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 31,20052:21 PM Subject: RE: updated district mtgs Janet, Is

### this what we came 

### up wit Dl June 13 Pat 

# -$$ D2 June 13 Janet 

# 2

,D3 June 14 Mllard(and Daniel?) 

## 4 D4 Mav 31 Pat and ~arrell 

## ~DONEY L I D5 ~une 13 Daniel D6 May Janet [DONE] D7 June20 Margaret Elderly Concerns June 8 air team 

### The key issue: 

### if we miss these dates 

### (if the districtscancel) the next options are 

### in July after the formal 

### close of the public comment period becausethe district meetings are linked to Council meetings 

# - there won't be anymore meetingsafter June 13 (except for District7). But I don't see any problemwith goingto district meetingsafter July 1 

### and still incorporating comments, if we have to. Also, I spoke with Darrell 

### G today. He said that 

### the best placeto reach people who live in 'subdivisions' is to put a flyer or some outreachdocument in the Housing Department office. Let's talk about having a flyer on the open burning issue at Housing (maybe with a check list for options or something like that). Darrell is double checkingto make sure 

### we are on Elderly Concernsfor next Wednesday (June 8). 

### 1 asked him to do this. Darrell

### Gwill 

### be at NCAl the week of June 13; 

### 1think someone was sayingthat NCAl mid-year had already happened. The challenge for us may bethat Council people may 

### be at NCAl and not at their district meetings (when we are there). But Janet, 

### Istillwould likeyou to notify

### the district representatives

### of Council when we are going to 

### be at their Districts. Thanks 

### Pat M

----Original Message---- 

### From: Janet Travis 

### [mailto:jtravis@gilanet.net] 

### Sent: Thursday, May 26,2005 1:59 PM 

### To: Patrlcla Mariella 

### Cc: wantone3@gilanet.net; russell betsuie; Margaret Cook; Lemy Williams; dan blair; Darrell Gerlaugh 

### Subject: updated district mtgs Janet & Dan will draft a one page summary of the open burning &fugitive dust ordinancesto distribute at the meetings since these ords are of most interestto Community members. D-I June 13 

### - Pat

### Page 

### 2 of

### 2

D-2 June 6 

### - Janet D-3 June 7 

# - Dan & Janet D-4 May 31 

# - Darrell, Pat,W~llard 0-5 June 13 

### - Darrell D8 Done 0-7 June 20 

# - Margaret Elderly 

### concerns June 8 

# - All?
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7047 

To provide for expedited additional support under the farm and ranch stress 

assistance network, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 28, 2020 

Mr. EMMER (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for expedited additional support under the farm 

and ranch stress assistance network, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPEDITED ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR FARM 

4 AND RANCH STRESS ASSISTANCE NETWORK. 

5 Section 7522 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy 

6 Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 5936) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7047 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘IN GENERAL.—THE SEC2 RETARY’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘IN GEN3 ERAL.— 

4 ‘‘(1) COMPETITIVE GRANTS.—The Secretary’’; 

5 and 

6 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(2) EXPEDITED ADDITIONAL AWARDS FOR

8 FISCAL YEAR 2020.—Not later than 60 days after 

9 the date of the enactment of this paragraph, from 

10 the amounts made available under subsection (d)(1), 

11 the Secretary shall award to each eligible recipient 

12 that meets the criteria determined by the Secretary, 

13 and submits an application within the time period 

14 specified by the Secretary, an amount to be deter15 mined by the Secretary, except in no case may such 

16 amount exceed $500,000.’’; and 

17 (2) by amending subsection (d) to read as fol18 lows: 

19 ‘‘(d) FUNDING.— 

20 ‘‘(1) FISCAL YEAR 2020 EMERGENCY FUND21 ING.—Out of funds in the Treasury not otherwise 

22 appropriated, there is appropriated to carry out this 

23 section $10,000,000 to remain available until Sep24 tember 30, 2021. Such funds are designated by the 

25 Congress as being for an emergency requirement 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7047 IH

1 pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Balanced 

2 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. 

3 ‘‘(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

4 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec5 retary to carry out this section $20,000,000 for each 

6 of fiscal years 2020 through 2023.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dian C. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, and David B. Spacht, Chief Financial
Officer, of Artesian Resources Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on our knowledge:

    1.  This Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

    2.  The information contained in this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 2, 2005                                 /s/ DIAN C. TAYLOR
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Dian C. Taylor
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)


                                                   /s/ DAVID B. SPACHT
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   David B. Spacht
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Cubic Corporation

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of CubicCorporation as of December 31, 2004, and the related condensed consolidatedstatements of income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended December31, 2004 and 2003.  These financialstatements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial informationconsists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data, andmaking inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accountingmatters.  It is substantially less inscope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression ofan opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such anopinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modificationsthat should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referredto above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accountingprinciples.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidatedbalance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2004 and the relatedconsolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cashflows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report datedNovember 24, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidatedfinancial statements.  In our opinion,the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balancesheet at September 30, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material respects, inrelation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

 
|                  |   | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                  |   |                      |
| San Diego, California |   |
| January 26, 2005      |   |
|                       |        |                           |        |  |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of GENESIS  COMPANIES GROUP, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Madhava  Rao Mankal,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Madhava Rao Mankal
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Madhava Rao Mankal,  CFO

Dated:  July__, 2008
**Exhibit 32.2**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do herebycertify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending July 2, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  August 16, 2006    /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer