alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                 Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings

                                NSC CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                     (In Thousands, Except Per-Share Data)

                                                 Years Ended December 31,
                                             -------------------------------
                                               1996        1995        1994
                                             -------     -------     -------
Primary :
  Average shares outstanding..............     9,971       9,971       9,971
  Net effect of dilutive equity
    securities outstanding based on
    the treasury stock method.............         -           -           -
                                             -------     -------     -------
     Total................................     9,971       9,971       9,971
                                             =======     =======     =======
  Net income .............................     1,861         715       2,566

  Per share amounts:
     Net income...........................      0.19        0.07        0.26


                                                 Years Ended December 31,
                                             -------------------------------
                                               1996        1995        1994
                                             -------     -------     -------
Fully Diluted :
  Average shares outstanding..............     9,971       9,971       9,971
  Net effect of dilutive equity
    securities outstanding based on
    the treasury stock method.............        87           -           -
                                             -------     -------     -------
     Total................................    10,058       9,971       9,971
                                             =======     =======     =======
     Net income...........................     1,861         715       2,566

  Per share amounts:
     Net income...........................      0.19        0.07        0.26


                                 Page 84 of 88

<PAGE>
The Honorable Thomas C. Mummert III, United States Magistrate Judge for the 1 Eastern Dis trict of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition b y consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2565

___________ James H. Cody, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Hillary B. Zimmerman; McPherson * District Court for the Land, L.P.; Gerard T. Carmody; * Eastern District of Missouri. Matthew D. Richardson; Missouri Title * Guaranty Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 3, 1997 Filed: December 16, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James H. Cody appeals from the order of the District Court dismissing hi s 1 complai nt without prejudice for failing to state a claim. After carefully reviewing the-2-

record and the parties & briefs, we aff irm the District Court & s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Rudolph P. GRIFFIN v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 45244.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 7, 1969.

C. Arthur McIntosh, Jacobs, Griffith & Hatcher, Cleveland, for appellant.

*694Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen., by Guy N. Rogers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2017

d1218 

# Order

Clerk December 27, 2017

155444

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155444

COA: 335809

Berrien CC: 2009

- 015792

- FC

WALLACE GEORGE CARLYLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2017

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[CC Docket No. 85-166, Phase I]


Petitions for Reconsideration and Clarification

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shari Spivey, (202) 418-0270.

SUMMARY: This document corrects Report No. 2240 regarding petitions for 
reconsideration and clarification published in the Federal Register on 
December 3, 1997, (FR Doc 97-31592). On page 63951, column two, the 
petition should be removed through lines 4-8.

Federal Communications Commission.
Magalie Roman Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33683 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-M
**Exhibit 32(b)**

 

**DPL Inc.**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Theundersigned officers of DPL Inc. (the “Issuer”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2008, which this certificate accompanies,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Issuers as of the dates and for the periods expressedtherein.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Issuer and will beretained by the Issuers and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 

 
| /s/  John J. Gillen                                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| John  J. Gillen                                               |   |
| Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

Date:April 23, 2008

 

The foregoing certificate is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theIssuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

53

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended April 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Annual Report), I, Donn R. Mitchell, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                             
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: July 30, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    Donn R. Mitchell, II                 
|                    |  |  |  | Donn R. Mitchell, II Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2020

a1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2020

161601-2

GILBERT STANOW, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161601; 161602

COA: 346641; 347275

Oakland CC: 2018-167805-NH;

BEAUMONT CENTER FOR PAIN MEDICINE, 2018-165819-NH

an assumed name for WILLIAM BEAUMONT 

HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

SEAN CONROY, M.D. and AMERICAN

ANESTHESIOLOGY OF MICHIGAN, P.C.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 17, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

ZAHRA, J. (dissenting). 

I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether the factors from Vicencio v Jaime 

Ramirez, MD, PC, 211 Mich App 501, 507 (1995), were appropriately applied in the 

dismissal analysis under MCR 2.504 in light of Maldonado v Ford Motor Co, 476 Mich 

372, 395 n 24 (2006).
January 27, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FREDERICK ONFRI, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00596-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Mable GEE, Appellant, v. Mabel BURDETTE, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harvey E. Studebaker, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 69-465.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 17, 1970.

*546Cabot, Scott, Wenkstem & Casteel, Hill, Bethel & McConnaughey, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Paul & Thomson, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her complaint. She brought suit in the circuit court seeking to rescind an agreement which settled her claims against the estate of Harvey E. Studebaker. The circuit court dismissed the complaint because it affirmatively appeared that the agreement was a stipulation of settlement which had been approved by an order of the county judge’s court, and no motion to set aside the order had been made in the county judge’s court. We affirm.

The administration of the estate is still pending in the County Judge’s Court in and for Dade County, Florida. The jurisdiction of the circuit court to rescind an agreement may not be invoked when the effect of the judgment sought would be to interfere with the jurisdiction of the county judge’s court over a pending estate. See White v. Bourne, 151 Fla. 12, 9 So.2d 170 (1942).

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrants' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August
30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,438
<INVENTORY>                                    181,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,028
<PP&E>                                       1,038,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 432,359
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,759,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          365,329
<BONDS>                                        687,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,076
<OTHER-SE>                                     594,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,759,910
<SALES>                                        825,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               825,104
<CGS>                                          633,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  633,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               144,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   287
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,562
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,649
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,741)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2615 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2615

    To amend the Small Business Act to allow certain applicants for 
paycheck protection program second draw loans to select a 90-day period 
          to demonstrate eligibility, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2021

  Mr. Balderson (for himself and Ms. Craig) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Small Business Act to allow certain applicants for 
paycheck protection program second draw loans to select a 90-day period 
          to demonstrate eligibility, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``PPP Second Draw Fairness Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM SECOND DRAW LOANS.

    Section 7(a)(37)(A)(iv)(I)(bb)(AA) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 636(a)(37)(A)(iv)(I)(bb)(AA)) is amended by inserting ``either 
during any contiguous 90-day period in 2020, or'' before ``during the 
first''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of The Wet Seal, Inc. for the period ended January 31, 2004, I, Joseph E. Deckop, Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer of The Wet Seal, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | This Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The
Wet Seal, Inc.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2004 |  | /s/    JOSEPH E.
DECKOP                     
|                     |  | Joseph E. Deckop                            
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and                
|                     |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer             
|                     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2602 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide for wage 

and economic stabilization in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2021 

Mr. SABLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on 

Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 

for wage and economic stabilization in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern Mariana Is5 lands Wage and Economic Stability Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2602 IH

1 SEC. 2. WAGE AND ECONOMIC STABILIZATION IN THE COM2 MONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA 

3 ISLANDS. 

4 Section 6 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 

5 (29 U.S.C. 206) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(h) In the case of any provision of law enacted dur8 ing the 10-year period beginning with 2021 that provides 

9 for an increase in the minimum wage rate set forth under 

10 subsection (a)(1) or (g)(1) of this section, section 

11 3(m)(2)(A)(i), or section 14(c)(1)(A), such increase shall 

12 be applied with respect to employers in the Commonwealth 

13 of the Northern Mariana Islands beginning on the date 

14 that is 18 months later than the date on which such provi15 sion of law otherwise takes effect.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. GAO REPORT. 

17 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

18 of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the 

19 Education and Labor Committee of the House of Rep20 resentatives, the Natural Resources Committee of the 

21 House of Representatives, the Committee on Health, Edu22 cation, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Com23 mittee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate 

24 a report that, with respect to the Commonwealth of the 

25 Northern Mariana Islands— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2602 IH

1 (1) assesses the status and structure of the 

2 economy (including employment, earnings and 

3 wages, and key industries); and 

4 (2) for each year during the 10-year period be5 ginning with 2021 in which an increase will take ef6 fect in the minimum wage rate set forth under sub7 section a(1) or g(1) of section 6, section 

8 3(m)(2)(A)(i), or section 14(c)(1)(A) of the Fair 

9 Labor Standards Act of 1938, estimates the propor10 tion of employees who will be directly affected by 

11 each such wage increase taking effect for such year, 

12 disaggregated by industry and occupation. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130337-8 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 130337-8 COA: 257139; 257140 Wayne CC: 04-005548-01; 04-001585-01 TERENCE DARRYL GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 11.2
<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED
(in thousands of dollars or shares except per share amounts)
Twenty-four Weeks Ended July 22, 2000 and July 24, 1999
<CAPTION>
                                         Twenty-four Weeks Ended
                                         -----------------------
                                          July 22,     July 24,
                                            2000         1999
                                         ---------    ---------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>
Diluted:
  Net earnings (loss) applicable to
    common shares:
      From continuing operations         $  4,191     $    385
      From discontinued operations           (583)      (1,271)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings (loss)              $  3,608     $   (886)
                                         =========    =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding              17,822       17,772
  Shares issuable under employee
    stock plans - weighted average             33           --*
  Dilutive effect of exercise of
    certain stock options                     193           --*
  Less: Treasury stock-weighted average    (9,725)      (7,864)
                                         ---------    ---------
  Weighted average number of common and
    common equivalent shares outstanding    8,323        9,908
                                         =========    =========
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares:
      From continuing operations         $   0.50     $   0.04
      From discontinued operations          (0.07)       (0.13)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings (loss)              $   0.43     $  (0.09)
                                         =========    =========
<FN>
* The dilutive effect of stock options in the amount of 315,203
  shares and 34,110 shares issuable under employee stock plans
  were not considered as the effect is antidilutive.
</FN>
</TABLE>
                              34