alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONof CFO

 

I,William W. Boyle, certify that:

 

1)              I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Cubic Corporation;

 

2)              Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3)              Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this  report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;

 

4)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of March 31, 2005; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this  report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’squarter ended December 31, 2004 that has materially affected or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5)              The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of theinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

May 9, 2005

 

 
| /s/ W. W. Boyle         |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| W. W. Boyle             |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY DELETION DOCKET**  **FOR KERR** **- MCGEE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT**  **SITE W** **EST CHICAGO, DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS**

**NOVEMBER 2**  **, 2012 NO.**  **DATE AUTHOR**  **RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION**  **PAGES** 1 04/00/89 U.S. EPA/ U.S. EPA Procedures for Completion 48 OSWER and Deletion of National Priorities List Sites (OSWER Directive 9320.2 - 3A) 2 01/00/00 U.S. EPA/ U.S. EPA Close Out Procedures for 45 OSWER National Priorities List Sites (OSWER Directive 9320.2 - 09A- P) 3 11/21/03 U.S. EPA Respondent Administrative Order by 43 Consent for the Kerr McGee Kress Creek/West Branch of DuPage River Site and Kerr -McGee Se wage Treatment Plant Site 4 10/07/03 Mitchell, J., Muno, W., Action Memorandum: 17 U.S. EPA U.S. EPA Request for a Time Critical Removal Action at the Kerr McGee Sewage Treatment Plant Site (PORTIONS O F THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED) 5 10/07/03 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record 3 Index (Original) for the Kerr -McGee West Chicago Sewage Treatment Plant Upland Operable Unit Removal Site (DOCUMENTS CONTAINED ON THE INDEX ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE DELETION DOCKET) 6 10/16/03 U.S. EPA Respondent Administrative Order on 47 Consent for Removal Action at the Kerr -McGee Sewage Treatment Plant Upland Oper able Unit**Kerr -** **McGee STP Deletion Docket** 

**Page 2 NO.**  **DATE AUTHOR**  **RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION**  **PAGES** 7 2004 - 2005 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record 14 Index (Original - Update #3) for the Kerr
-McGee Sewage Treatment Plant Site (DOCUMENTS CONTAINED ON THE INDEX ARE INCORP ORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE DELETION DOCKET) 8 06/00/08 ARCADIS Tronox LLC Final Completion Report 218 for Reach 5A at the Kress Creek/West Branch DuPage River Site and the River Portion of the Sewage Treatment Plant Site 9 08/12/08 Mitchell, J., Krippel, M., Letter re: Completion of 2 U.S. EPA Kerr -McGee Work Under AOC for Removal Chemical LLC Action at the Kerr -McGee Sewage Treatment Plant Site 10 11/00/08 ARCADIS Tronox LLC Final Completion Report 175 for Reach 5B at the Kress Cree k/West Branch DuPage River Site and the River Portion of the Sewage Treatment Plant Site (Revised) 11 06/12/12 Karl, R., File Final Close Out Report 8 U.S. EPA for the Kerr -McGee Sewage Treatment Plant Site 12 09/11/12 Kim, J., Karl, R., Letter re: State of 1 Illinois EPA U.S. EPA Illinois Concurrence on the Delisting of the Kerr -McGee Chemical Corporation (Tronox Corporation) Sewage Trea tment Plan NPL Site
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE ACCOMPANYING CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATAMETRICS
CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JULY 25, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                         JUL-25-1999
<CASH>                                               776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          4,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     8,138
<PP&E>                                               7,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       14,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,613
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             190
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                           41,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         14,347
<SALES>                                              6,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     6,273
<CGS>                                                3,543
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,543
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,646)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (16,469)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.09)




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3772]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Notice of Availability of 1997 Competitive Grant Funds for 
Migrant Farmworkers

AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.

ACTION: Solicitation of proposals for the provision of civil legal 
services for migrant farmworkers in the state of Pennsylvania.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Legal Services Corporation (LSC or Corporation) is the 
national organization charged with administering federal funds provided 
for civil legal services to the poor. Congress has adopted legislation 
requiring LSC to utilize a system of competitive bidding for the award 
of grants and contracts for calendar year 1997.
    The Corporation hereby reannounces the availability of 1997 
competitive grant funds and is soliciting grant proposals from 
interested parties who are qualified to provide effective, efficient, 
and high quality civil legal services to the LSC-eligible migrant 
population in the state of Pennsylvania. The Corporation plans to award 
a grant in the amount of $133,096.

DATES: Request for Proposals(RFP) will be available after February 14, 
1997. A Notice of Intent to Compete is due by March 14, 1997. Grant 
proposals must be received at LSC offices by 5:00 p.m. EDT, March 28, 
1997.

ADDRESS: Legal Services Corporation--Competitive Grants, 750 First 
Street N.E., 10th Floor, Washington, DC 20002-4250.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Thomas, Administrative Assistant, 
Office of Program Operations, (202) 336-8865.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: LSC is seeking proposals from recipients, 
other non-profit organizations that have as a purpose the furnishing of 
legal assistance to eligible clients, private attorneys, groups of 
private attorneys or law firms, State or local governments, and 
substate regional planning and coordination agencies which are composed 
of substate areas and whose governing boards are controlled by locally 
elected officials.
    The solicitation package, containing the grant application, 
guidelines, proposal content requirements and specific selection 
criteria, is available by contacting the Corporation by letter, phone 
or FAX. LSC will not FAX the solicitation package to interested 
parties; however, solicitation packages may be requested by FAX. The 
Corporation may be contacted at: (202)336-8865; FAX (202)336-7272.

    Issue Date: February 11, 1997.
Stephanie Rorie,
Managing Program Analyst, Office of Program Operations.
[FR Doc. 97-3772 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
255 La. 800

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jessie LOMAS and Robert W. Womack v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50456.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1970.

In re: Jessie Lomas and Robert W. Wo-mack applying for writs of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. This Court has been supplied with the record of the District Court in these proceedings. After a consideration of such record, we find that the showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction. i
Exhibit
      10.32


STATE
      OF
      MISSISSIPPI


COUNTY
      OF
      HARRISON


FIRST
      JUDICIAL DISTRICT








**FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE**





THIS
      FIRST AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE (this “ First
      Amendment ”)
      is
      made and entered into effective the 14 th day of
      June, 2006 by and between **FAMILY
      LANDS L.P.** ,
      a
      Mississippi limited partnership (the “ Landlord ”),
      with
      an address of 3702 Hardy Street, Hattiesburg, MS 39402; and **IOC
      MISSISSIPPI, INC.** ,
      a
      Mississippi corporation (the “ Tenant ”),
      with
      an address of 1641 Popps Ferry Road #B-1, Biloxi, MS 39532.




**Background**




A.  Landlord
      and Tenant have entered into that certain Ground Lease dated May 5, 2006
      (the “ Lease ”).




B.  Landlord
      and Tenant desire to amend the legal description and plat for the Land set
      forth
      on Exhibit A to the
      Lease.




**Terms**




NOW,
      THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
      of
      which is hereby acknowledged, and for other good and valuable consideration,
      and
      intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as
      follows:




1.
            Land
                Description.Exhibit
                Aattached to the Lease is hereby deleted andExhibit Aattached hereto and incorporated herein and for all purposes hereby
                substituted in the place and stead ofExhibit Aattached to the Lease.




2.
            Full
                Force and Effect.
                Except as amended by this First Amendment, the Lease shall remain
                in full
                force and effect and is hereby ratified and
                affirmed.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Landlord and the Tenant have caused this First Amendment
      to
      be executed effective the day and year first above written.




LANDLORD:


FAMILY
      LANDS L.P.


a
      Mississippi limited partnership





By:  Pine
      Hills, Inc.


a
      Delaware corporation, its general partner





By:   /s/Stewart
      Gammill, IV______________


STEWART
      GAMMILL, IV


Its:  President







1





TENANT:


IOC
      MISSISSIPPI, INC.





By:  /s/Gregory
      P. Guida_____________________




Gregory
      P. Guida_______________________




Its:  Senior
      Vice President____________________








GUARANTOR:


ISLE
      OF
      CAPRI CASINO, INC.


a
      Delaware corporation





By:  /s/Gregory
      P. Guida_____________________





Gregory
      P. Guida_______________________




Its:  Senior
      Vice President____________________




2
Exh1066BoardofDirectorsCompensationPolicy10-1-2013






CONTANGO OIL & GAS COMPANY


Director Compensation Plan


(Effective 10/1/13)


Cash Compensation
		
	•
	Annual Retainer Fees (all payable quarterly, in arrears, with appropriate adjustments for partial periods)


		
	◦
	Board membership - $50,000 per year


		
	◦
	Non-Executive Board Chairman - $50,000 per year


		
	◦
	Audit Committee Chairman - $15,000 per year


		
	◦
	Compensation Committee Chairman - $10,000 per year


		
	◦
	Nominating & Governance Committee Chairman - $9,500 per year


		
	◦
	No separate retainer fee for Investment Committee Chairman




		
	•
	Meeting Fees (all payable quarterly, in arrears)


		
	o
	Regular Board 


		
	▪
	$1,000 per meeting attended in person (no fee for telephonic)


		
	▪
	No maximum per year


		
	o
	Committee Meetings


		
	§
	$1,000 per meeting attended in person (no fee for telephonic)


		
	§
	No maximum per year


		
	§
	Payable in addition to regular board meetings, even if on same day




Equity Compensation
		
	•
	Annual grants (with appropriate adjustments for partial periods)


		
	o
	$110,000 in Restricted Stock, vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant


		
	o
	Pro-rated amount granted upon re-election at fall / winter 2013 annual stockholders meeting


		
	o
	Full amount granted upon re-election at annual stockholders meetings beginning spring 2014


		
	o
	Pro-rated amount granted upon initial election for new members


		
	o
	All pro-rated grants based on portion of service year remaining between date of grant and the next May 31st 




Other
		
	•
	Each Directors is required to maintain ownership of at least fifty percent (50%) of the equity granted within the last three calendar years for service on the Board 




		
	•
	Payment of reasonable travel expenses associated with Board and Committee Meeting attendance 




		
	•
	No Director who is an employee of the Company will be compensated for service as a member of the Board of Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 99(a)
                                                                   -------------

                 SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                 (In thousands)
<TABLE><CAPTION>
                                                                                   (2)
                                                                     (1)         Charged                     Changes
                                                    Balance at    Charged to     to other                     due to      Balance at
                                                    beginning     costs and      accounts     Deductions   acquisitions     end of
                       Description                  of period      expenses     (describe)    (describe)  or dispositions   period
                       -----------                  ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------    ----------
<S>                                                 <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
For the year ended December 31, 1998
   Allowances deducted from assets
   Accounts receivable (for doubtful receivables)   $      985           433          --            (443)(a)      --             975
   Inventory (primarily for obsolescence)                2,903           627          --          (1,889)(b)      --           1,641

For the year ended December 31, 1999
   Allowances deducted from assets
   Accounts receivable (for doubtful receivables)   $      975           931          --            (261)(a)       131(c)      1,776
   Inventory (primarily for obsolescence)                1,641           879          --            (328)(b)     1,196(c)      3,388

For the year ended December 31, 2000
   Allowances deducted from assets
   Accounts receivable (for doubtful receivables)   $    1,776         1,464          --          (1,393)(a)        12(d)      1,859
   Inventory (primarily for obsolescence)                3,388           797          --          (1,011)(b)      (820)(d)     2,354

</TABLE>

   -----------------------------------------------------
   (a) Primarily accounts written off, net of recoveries
   (b) Primarily obsolete parts written off
   (c) Primarily due to the purchase of EFI, the sale of Romac and the
       shutdown of McKenica.
   (d) Primarily due to the purchase of TAT, PCM and the transfer of McKenica
       balances with the sale of the "Automotive Businesses"
EXHIBIT 32

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the "Trust") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:



|               |  | Bank of America, N.A.,
Trustee for Hugoton Royalty Trust
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|March 14, 2005 |  | By:                                                     

---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     In connection with the Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company (the “Company”) for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Barry A. Fromberg, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.           /s/ BARRY A. FROMBERG             Barry A. Fromberg      *Chief Financial Officer*  Date: November 14, 2005      Note: This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
24
255 La. 797

#### STATE of Louisiana v. John K. SNYDER.

No. 50390.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1970.

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

Inasmuch as the issue presented in the above entitled application for writs is identical with that in the case of State of Louisiana v. John Louis Elie, William Edward Scott and Clifton Styles, bearing No. 50,237 of this Court, then pending before us, consideration of this application has been withheld until final disposition of the latter case; our decision in that case was handed down on February 23, 1970, 255 La. 767, 232 So.2d 507 and is controlling in the instant matter as a rehearing was this day denied therein.

For the reasons assigned in the case of State v. Elie, Scott and Styles, the ruling of the trial judge refusing to submit the motion to recuse the judges of the Ninth Judicial District Court for hearing is overruled and it is now ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the Honorable Guy E. Hum-phries, Jr., Judge of the Ninth Judicial District, appoint a judge from an adjoining district to try the motion to recuse.

SANDERS, J., having dissented in State v. Elie et al., now concurs.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry Gene HARRISON et al.

No. 53223.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 29, 1973.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., LeRoy A. Hartley, Sp. Counsel to Atty. Gen., New Orleans, Frank T. Salter, Jr., Dist. Atty., James Mclnnis,- Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellant.

James J. Cox, Cox, Cox & Grand, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees.

SANDERS, Chief Justice.

The defendants were charged with “disturbing the peace” by a bill of information, dated June 21, 1971, which specifies that they “with the intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or under circumstances such that a breach of the peace might have for-seeably been occasioned thereby: did, knowingly and intentionally crowd and congregate with each other . . . and did fail and refuse to disperse and move on when requested to do so . : . in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:103.1, subd. A(l).”

Relying upon the 1965 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Cox v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536, 85 S.Ct. 453, 13 L. Ed.2d 471, holding LSA-R.S. 14:103.1 unconstitutional, the district court quashed the indictment.

The State has appealed.

In passing upon the constitutionality of LSA-R.S. 14:103.1, the United States Supreme Court held:

> “. . . [T]he statute is unconstitutional in that it sweeps within its broad scope activities that are constitutionally protected free speech and assembly. Maintenance of the opportunity for free political discussion is a basic tenet of our constitutional democracy. As Chief Justice Hughes stated in Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359, 369, 51 S.Ct. 532, 536, 75 L.Ed. 1117, 1122, 73 A.L.R. 1484: 'A statute which upon its face, and as authoritatively construed, is so vague and indefinite as to permit the punishment of the fair use of this opportunity is repugnant to the guaranty of liberty contained in the Fourteenth Amendment.’ ”

The State accepts the above holding as authoritative, based upon our prior construction of the statute. It urges us, however, to abandon our prior construction and re-interpret the statute to confine it to constitutional limits. We are convinced that our previous interpretation of the statute is correct. See State v. Ganch, 263 La. 251, 268 So.2d 214 (1972). In our opinion, the restructuring of the statute addresses itself to the Legislature. Hence, *216the judgment of the trial court, quashing the bill of information, is correct.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

SUMMERS, J„ dissents.