alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND
COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (825)
<INVENTORY>                                     33,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,002
<PP&E>                                           6,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,703
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,485
<SALES>                                        161,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,540
<CGS>                                           90,925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,853<F1>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,702
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
<FN>
<F1>INTEREST INCOME NET OF INTEREST EXPENSE
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10 (kk)



               Summary of Fiscal Years 1998 - 2000 Retention Bonus
                  for the President and Chief Executive Officer

In September 1997, the Company provided Mr. Skates a restricted $7,000,000 bonus
as an  incentive  to  remain  in the  employment  of the  Company  as its  Chief
Executive  Officer for an additional three years.  This bonus will become earned
and vested and its restrictions will lapse over the three-year period commencing
on September 28, 1997 and ending September 30, 2000. The bonus will become fully
vested and free of restrictions upon a change in control of the Company, or upon
termination of Mr. Skates's  employment by the Company. If Mr. Skates terminates
his employment with the Company voluntarily prior to October 1, 2000, he will be
obligated  to repay the  Company  on the day of such  termination  any  unvested
amounts paid to him under this bonus.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          46,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,361,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                   186,799
<INVENTORY>                                  5,327,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,046,619
<PP&E>                                       5,227,596
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,984,758
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,312,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,108,753
<BONDS>                                      1,854,471
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,098
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,335,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,312,197
<SALES>                                      2,823,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,823,077
<CGS>                                        1,704,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,704,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,463
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (288,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (96,362)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (192,378)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (192,378)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-1004.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 3, 1973.

*227James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Charles H. Livingston, Asst. Public Defender, Sarasota, Judge C. Luckey, Jr., Public Defender, and J. Stephen Gardner, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin,- Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

Robert Lee Coleman was convicted by a jury of having been a felon in possession of a firearm. Before the time had run, he filed his notice of appeal. Notwithstanding this fact, the County Solicitor’s office filed a direct information charging him with being a subsequent felony offender under F.S. § 775.084, F.S.A. He filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that he had appealed his prior conviction, i.e., felon in possession of firearm, and that his conviction of that crime was therefore not final and he could not then be charged under Chapter 775.084, F.S., *supra.*The trial judge denied his motion to dismiss and forthwith sentenced him to thirty years in Raiford.

The Supreme Court in Joyner v. State, 1947, 158 Fla. 806, 30 So.2d 304, construed the definition of conviction and said:

> “It appears to be very well settled that before a prior conviction may be relied upon to enhance the punishment in a subsequent case such prior conviction must be final. If an appeal has been taken from a judgment of guilty in the trial court that conviction does not become final until the judgment of the lower court has been affirmed by the appellate court.” 30 So.2d at 305.

Therefore the conviction of felon is in possession of firearm was not final at the time the trial judge found the appellant guilty as a felony offender and the cause must be remanded with directions consistent with this opinion.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2005 ofCrown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 15, 2005         /s/ E. Randall Chestnut         E. Randall Chestnut    Chairman of the Board, President & Chief    Executive Officer
#### Barbara DAUVEN; et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. State of OREGON; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 01-35723.

D.C. No. CV-01-00173.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2002.

*256Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Barbara and Ted Dauven appeal pro se the district court’s dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from a traffic citation and subsequent state court proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal, see *Wyler Summit P’ship v. Turner Broad. Sys. Inc.,*135 F.3d 658, 661 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

Dismissal was proper because, to the extent the Dauvens’ claims would effectively require reversal of the judgment of the Washington County Justice Court, the claims are barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

The district court properly dismissed all claims for tort liability based on the state police officer’s testimony about the circumstances of Barbara Dauven’s traffic stop because that testimony was relevant to the state court’s determination of whether Barbara Dauven committed a traffic infraction and thus the testimony was privileged. *See Leveque v. Paulson,*126 Or.App. 12, 867 P.2d 516, 517 (1994) (explaining that the Oregon testimony privilege embraces any statement that may possibly be pertinent to the proceeding in which it is made).

The district court properly found that the Dauvens’ claims against the State of Oregon are barred by the Eleventh Amendment. *See Edelman v. Jordan,*415 U.S. 651, 663, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 39 L.Ed.2d 662 (1974).

The Dauvens’ remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 702 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 702

To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the jurisdiction 
 of courts of the United States and of the States over certain foreign 
                   entities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2019

 Mr. Conaway (for himself and Mr. Ryan) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the jurisdiction 
 of courts of the United States and of the States over certain foreign 
                   entities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Foreign Businesses 
Sanctuary Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OVER CERTAIN FOREIGN ENTITIES.

    Section 1605 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an entity is not 
immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States or of 
the States if the entity--
            ``(1) is incorporated in a foreign state in which state-
        owned or state-controlled entities commonly engage in 
        commercial activity; and
            ``(2) conducts commercial activity in the United States.''.

SEC. 3. COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY OF AFFILIATE ENTITIES.

    Section 1603(d) of title 28, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``A''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) For purposes of this chapter, a commercial activity 
        of an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state, or of an 
        entity described in section 1605(e), shall be attributable to 
        any corporate affiliate of the agency, instrumentality, or 
        entity that--
                    ``(A) directly or indirectly owns a majority of 
                shares of the agency, instrumentality, or entity; and
                    ``(B) is also an agency or instrumentality of a 
                foreign state, or an entity described in section 
                1605(e).''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7131 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit deprivation of rights 

under color of law by law enforcement and correctional officers, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2020 

Mr. ESPAILLAT (for himself and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit deprivation of rights under color of law by law enforcement 

and correctional officers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Denial of Rights Pre5 vention and Accountability Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 13 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 242 the 

9 following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7131 IH

1 ‘‘§ 242A. Deprivation of rights by law enforcement 

2 ‘‘Whoever, being a law enforcement officer or correc3 tional officer, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, 

4 regulation, or custom, recklessly subjects any person in 

5 any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or Dis6 trict to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immu7 nities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of 

8 the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or 

9 penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or 

10 by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for 

11 the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title 

12 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bod13 ily injury results from the acts committed in violation of 

14 this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, 

15 or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or 

16 fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more 

17 than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts 

18 committed in violation of this section or if such acts in19 clude kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sex20 ual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual 

21 abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, 

22 or imprisoned for any term of years, or both.’’. 

23 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

24 The table of sections for chapter 13 of title 18, United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7131 IH

1 States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relat2 ing to section 242 the following: 

‘‘242A. Deprivation of rights by law enforcement.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Document

            Exhibit 10.4    



August 18, 2021


Darin Gibbins


Dear Darin,


On behalf of Valaris Limited (“Valaris”), I am pleased to provide you with this letter agreement (this “Agreement”) memorializing the terms of your employment with Valaris or one of its subsidiaries to serve as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Valaris, effective as of September 3, 2021.  


During the period that you serve as the Interim Chief Financial Officer of Valaris (the “Term”), as compensation for all services provided by you, you will receive an additional $10,000 base salary per month, pro-rated for any partial month during the term and less applicable taxes and other withholdings, paid in accordance with the company’s payroll practices in effect from time to time.  Your remaining terms and conditions of employment will remain unchanged.  


Although we intend that the Term will continue until a permanent successor is identified and appointed, your employment is not for a specific term and remains terminable at-will. This letter agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Texas without reference to any jurisdiction’s principles of conflicts of law and reflects the parties entire understanding and agreement with regard to the foregoing. 


We look forward to continuing to work with you during this exciting period for Valaris. 




Sincerely,
			
	



/s/ Anton Dibowitz_________________________
Anton Dibowitz
Director



Acknowledged and Agreed
			
	



/s/ Darin Gibbins_________________________
Darin Gibbins
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Thrift Supervision
[AC-1; OTS Nos. H-2158 and 02438]


Cumberland Mountain Bancshares, M.H.C., Middlesboro, Kentucky; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on January 30, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Cumberland Mountain Bancshares, M.H.C., Middlesboro, Kentucky, to 
convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application 
are available for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and 
the Central Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 200 West 
Madison Street, Suite 1300, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

    Dated: February 10, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3594 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
10-27 Exhibit 2008 LTIP Amend - 12.31.13


Exhibit 10-27


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.
2008 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


WHEREAS, Allegheny Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the 2008 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, the Company became a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp. (“FirstEnergy”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 10, 2010, as amended as of June 4, 2010, by and among FirstEnergy, Element Merger Sub, Inc. and the Company (the “Merger Agreement”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, FirstEnergy authorized certain officers of FirstEnergy to amend or modify plans maintained by the Company with regard to administrative or governance matters;
WHEREAS, Section 9.17 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended at any time with certain limitations that are not applicable for this Amendment No. 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of  January 1, 2012, as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 2.17 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




“Sec. 2.17    ”Fair Market Value” means an amount based on a reasonable method, as may be determined by the Committee, including a price based on the opening, closing, actual, high, low, average selling prices, or on the average of the high and low sales prices of the common stock as reported on the composite tape of the NYSE for the date in which the determination of the fair market value is made or, if there are no sales of common stock on that date, then on the next preceding date on which there were sales of common stock.  If Shares are not publicly traded, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee in such manner as it deems appropriate.  Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, “Fair Market Value” shall be determined in a manner consistent with exemption from, and avoidance of adverse tax consequences under, Code Section 409A and, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, also in a manner consistent with Code Section 422.”


		
	2.
	Except as otherwise amended by this Amendment No. 1, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FirstEnergy has caused its duly authorized officer to executive this 
Amendment No. 1 of the Plan on behalf of the Company to evidence its adoption on  January 1, 2012.




   EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.                                            BY FIRSTENERGY, CORP.    


	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Anthony J. Alexander,
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Anthony J. Alexander,
	 
	 

	 
	 
	President and Chief Executive
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Officer of FirstEnergy Corp.