alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

December 17, 2013

Response to October 13 Comment

Thank you for the letter dated October 13, 2013, which you submitted in connection with 

Polypore International, Inc.’s (“Polypore”) Application for Approval of the Divestiture of 

Microporous (“Application”), filed on September 24, 2013. Pursuant to the order in Docket No. 

9327, Polypore requested prior Commission approval of its proposal to divest Microporous to 

Seven Mile Capital Partners (“Seven Mile”). In your letter, you expressed concerns that 

Polypore would make a profit on the divestiture, that Seven Mile has too many ties to Polypore, 

and that it has never purchased a company before.

In connection with its evaluation of this proposed transaction, the Commission received 

information from numerous sources, including the parties to the transaction and third parties, in 

addition to letters submitted by commenters during the public comment period.

The purpose of the divestiture is to restore competition lost through the transaction. In 

evaluating Polypore’s Application, the Commission analyzed all of the information available to 

it against that standard, including the public comments. In particular, the Commission 

thoroughly reviewed Seven Mile’s finances, investment history, and financial incentives as well 

as its independence from Polypore. As long as Polypore completes the required transaction on 

time, and to a buyer and in a manner that receives the Commission’s prior approval, nothing in 

the Commission’s Order prevents Polypore from making a profit on the divestiture of 

Microporous, since that does not interfere with the remedial goals of the order. The Commission 

has, thus, determined to approve the proposed transaction.

It helps the Commission’s analysis to hear from a variety of sources in its work on 

antitrust and consumer protection issues, and we appreciate your interest in this matter.

By direction of the Commission, Commissioner Wright not participating.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>    THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
            EXTRACTED FROM LYNTON GROUP, INC.'S AUDITED ANNUAL
            REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
            AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
            SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>               OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                         2,329,234
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  4,955,822
<ALLOWANCES>                      22,895
<INVENTORY>                   13,480,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              21,563,875
<PP&E>                        32,145,789
<DEPRECIATION>                 4,878,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                62,558,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         22,175,310
<BONDS>                       30,064,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                       1,918,462
<OTHER-SE>                     2,853,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  62,558,050  
<SALES>                        6,909,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               6,909,971
<CGS>                          5,436,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  6,354,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  19,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               314,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  221,273
<INCOME-TAX>                      28,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              192,373
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     192,373
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.03
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Region V Advisory Council Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration Region V Advisory Council 
located in the geographical area of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, will hold a 
public meeting from 12:00 p.m. to 1:30 p.m., on Tuesday, February 18, 
1997, at the Milwaukee Area Chamber (MMAC) Association of Commerce 
Building (Milwaukee & Mason) Fourth Floor--The Milwaukee Room, 756 
North Milwaukee Street, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, to discuss such matters 
as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business 
Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Gloria Holter at (414) 287-
4100.

    Dated: February 3, 1997.
Michael P. Novelli,
Director, Office of Advisory Councils.
[FR Doc. 97-4268 Filed 2-18-97; 11:37 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3717]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-46, RM-8990]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Boonville, CA

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making 
filed on behalf of Boonville Broadcasting Company seeking the allotment 
of FM Channel 241A to Boonville, California, as that locality's first 
local aural transmission service. Petitioner is requested to provide 
additional information to establish Boonville's status as a community 
for allotment purposes. Coordinates used for this proposal are 39-03-42 
and 123-31-47.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 31, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 15, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 
20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties 
should serve the petitioner's counsel, as follows: Henry E. Crawford, 
Esq., Law Offices of Henry E. Crawford, Suite 900, 1150 Connecticut 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-46, adopted January 
31, 1997, and released February 7, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC's Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractors, International 
Transcription Services, Inc., 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 140, 
Washington, DC 20037, (202) 857-3800.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of l980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-3717 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

The undersigned certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that:

i.                              The accompanying AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the period ended December 30, 2006, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

ii.                           The informationcontained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Verytruly yours,

 

EdwardR. Cameron
| /s/Edward R. Cameron |   |
|----------------------|--------|
| President            |

 

 

PatrickJ. Winters

 
| /s/Patrick J. Winters        |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Principal Accounting Officer |

 

Date:  March 29, 2007

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Alford G. CLARK et al. v. HARRISON PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO., INC., et al.

No. 61157.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Alford G. Clark and Glynn L. Bannister applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans.

Granted.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
**Exhibit 32**

 

THE DAYTON POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officersof The Dayton Power and Light Company (the “Issuer”) hereby certify that theIssuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005, which this certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theIssuer.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuerand will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
| Signed:              |   |
|----------------------|--------|
|                 |   |
|                 |   |
| /s/ James V. Mahoney |   |
| James V. Mahoney     |
|                 |
|                 |
| /s/ John J. Gillen   |   |
| John J. Gillen       |

 

 

Date:  October 28, 2005

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 734 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 734

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require States 
  to accept applications to register to vote in elections for Federal 
office in the State from individuals under 18 years of age at the time 
                            of application.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2019

  Mr. Neguse (for himself and Mr. Sarbanes) introduced the following 
   bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require States 
  to accept applications to register to vote in elections for Federal 
office in the State from individuals under 18 years of age at the time 
                            of application.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Next Generation Votes Act''.

SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE OF VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS FROM INDIVIDUALS 
              UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE.

    (a) Acceptance of Applications.--Section 8 of the National Voter 
Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20507) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (i) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(j) Acceptance of Applications From Individuals Under 18 Years of 
Age.--
            ``(1) In general.--A State may not refuse to accept or 
        process an individual's application to register to vote in 
        elections for Federal office on the grounds that the individual 
        is under 18 years of age at the time the individual submits the 
        application, so long as the individual is at least 16 years of 
        age at such time.
            ``(2) No effect on state voting age requirements.--Nothing 
        in paragraph (1) may be construed to require a State to permit 
        an individual who is under 18 years of age at the time of an 
        election for Federal office to vote in the election.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections occurring on or after January 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
#### William A. NICHOLS, individually, Bruce A. Nichols, a minor, by and through his mother and next friend, Aenmear Brown Nichols, Appellants, v. REESE EXTERMINATING COMPANY, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 70-796.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 18, 1971.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; William G. Akridge, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 10.22

SIXTH AMENDMENT TO

BJ SERVICES COMPANY 2000 INCENTIVE PLAN

WHEREAS, BJ Services Company (the Company) has heretofore adopted the BJ Services Company 2000 Incentive Plan (the Plan);

WHEREAS, the Plan has heretofore been amended by five separate amendments, two of which were adopted on March 22, 2001 and the
remainder adopted on October 15, 2001; July 28, 2005; and December 7, 2006; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend
the Plan in certain additional respects;

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of October 13, 2008:



| | 1. | Paragraph 3(c)(ii) of Article II and paragraph 3(c)(ii) of Article III shall be amended to read as follows:
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

through tendering to the Company shares of Common Stock already owned by the person (provided that the Company may, upon confirming that the person
owns the number of share being tendered, issue a new certificate for the number of shares being acquired pursuant to the exercise of the option less the number of shares being tendered upon the exercise and return to the person (or not require
surrender of) the certificate for the shares being tendered upon exercise),
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL K. CRANE-HIRSCH

Trial Attorney

Office of Consumer Litigation

Civil Division

United States Department of Justice

PO Box 386

Washington, DC 20044-0386

Telephone: 202-616-8242

Facsimile: 202-514-8742

daniel.crane-hirsch@usdoj.gov

Attorney for Plaintiff United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF ARIZONA – PHOENIX DIVISION

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) No. CV 10-0696-PHX-LOA

)

DIRECT MARKETING ASSOCIATES, CORP., )

and JOHN M. RAINEY, JR. )

)

Defendants. )

)

UNITED STATES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO APPROVE STIPULATED FINAL

JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR CIVIL PENALTIES,

PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF

Plaintiff, the United States of America, respectfully moves the Court to approve

and enter the parties’ (proposed) Stipulated Final Judgment and Order for Civil Penalties,

Permanent Injunction, and Other Equitable Relief, attached hereto.

Undersigned counsel for the United States (Crane-Hirsch) has conferred with

counsel for defendants (L. Jean Noonan), and is authorized to state that this motion is

unopposed.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff the United States respectfully moves that the Court

grant this Unopposed Motion to Approve Stipulated Final Judgment and Order for Civil

Penalties, Permanent Injunction, and Other Equitable Relief.

1

Case 2:10-cv-00696-LOA Document 4 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: March 29, 2010

Of Counsel:

JESSICA RICH

Acting Associate Director

Division of Privacy and Identity

Protection

REBECCA E. KUEHN

Assistant Director

Division of Privacy and Identity

Protection

WILLIAM HAYNES

KATRINA A. BLODGETT

Attorneys

Division of Privacy and Identity

Protection

Federal Trade Commission

600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20580

Respectfully submitted,

Attorneys for United States of America

TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General

DENNIS BURKE

United States Attorney

District of Arizona

EUGENE M. THIROLF, Director

KENNETH L. JOST, Deputy Director

Office of Consumer Litigation

/s Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch

DANIEL K. CRANE-HIRSCH

Trial Attorney

United States Department of Justice

Office of Consumer Litigation

PO Box 386

Washington, DC 20044-0386

Telephone: 202-616-8242

Facsimile: 202-514-8742

daniel.crane-hirsch.@usdoj.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 29, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. Counsel for defendants is being

served via e-mail and U.S. mail as follows:

L. Jean Noonan, Esq.

Hudson Cook LLP

1020 19

th

St. NW

7 Floor

th

Washington, DC 20036

202-327-9700

jnoonan@hudco.com

s/ Daniel K. Crane-Hirsch

2

Case 2:10-cv-00696-LOA Document 4 Filed 03/29/10 Page 2 of 2
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7238 

To require the Secretary of Defense to recommend a minimum number 

of bomber aircraft. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. BROWN of Maryland (for himself and Mrs. HARTZLER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to recommend a 

minimum number of bomber aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long Range Bomber 

5 Expansion Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MINIMUM BOMBER AIRCRAFT FORCE LEVEL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than February 1, 2021, 

8 the Secretary of the Air Force shall submit to the congres9 sional defense committees a report with recommendations 

10 for the bomber aircraft force structure that enables the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7238 IH

1 Air Force to meet the requirements of its long-range strike 

2 mission under the National Defense Strategy. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under sub4 section (a) shall include each of the following elements: 

5 (1) The bomber force structure necessary to 

6 meet the requirements of the Air Force’s long-range 

7 strike mission under the National Defense Strategy, 

8 including— 

9 (A) the total minimum number of bomber 

10 aircraft; and 

11 (B) the minimum number of primary mis12 sion aircraft. 

13 (2) The penetrating bomber force structure nec14 essary to meet the requirements of the Air Force’s 

15 long-range strike mission in contested or denied en16 vironments under the National Defense Strategy, to 

17 include— 

18 (A) the total minimum number of pene19 trating bomber aircraft; and 

20 (B) the minimum number of primary mis21 sion penetrating bomber aircraft. 

22 (3) A roadmap outlining how the Air Force 

23 plans to reach the force structure identified under 

24 paragraphs (1) and (2), including an established 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7238 IH

1 goal date for achieving the minimum number of 

2 bomber aircraft. 

3 (c) FORM.—The report submitted under subsection 

4 (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may in5 clude a classified annex. 

6 (d) PUBLICATION.—The Secretary shall make avail7 able to the public the unclassified form of the report sub8 mitted under subsection (a). 

9 (e) BOMBER AIRCRAFT.—In this section, the term 

10 ‘‘bomber aircraft’’ includes penetrating bombers in addi11 tion to B–52H aircraft. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3817]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (97-015)]


NASA Advisory Council (NAC), Advisory Committee on the 
International Space Station (ACISS); Meeting.

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 62 FR 4552, Notice 
Number 97-009, January 30, 1997.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATES AND ADDRESSES OF MEETING: Tuesday, February 
18, 1997, from 8:30 a.m. To 5:00 p.m. and Wednesday, February 19, 1997, 
from 12:30 p.m. Until 2:00 p.m.; NASA Headquarters, MIC 7, 300 E 
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20546.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: Dates changed to February 18, 1997, from 8:30 
a.m. To 4:00 p.m. and Wednesday, February 19, 1997, from 12:30 a.m. To 
2:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. W. Michael Hawes, Code M-4, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, 
202/358-0242.

    Dated: February 5, 1997.
Leslie M. Nolan,
Advisory Committee Management Officer National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-3817 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
#### UNITED ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Harold W. FRIEDMAN, Appellee.

No. 73-204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 2, 1974.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 29, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### TOWN OF PALM BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellant, v. PALM BEACH LOCAL 1866 OF the INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS, etc., Appellee.

No. 72-451.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 5, 1972.

It appearing to the Court that the issues involved in the appeal in the above cause are matters within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida, therefore, pursuant to the provisions of Florida Appellate Rules, it is ordered that said cause be transferred to said Supreme Court of Florida for consideration and determination. In re Estate of Daniel Emmitt Brown, Fla.App. 1959, 114 So.2d 522; Franklin v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 440. Counsel for the litigants have been duly advised and agree that jurisdiction is vested in the Supreme Court of Florida per Art. 5, 4(2), Florida Constitution (1968).