alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**
**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**
1.  Swift Transportation Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 2.  Swift Leasing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 3.  Common Market Distributing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 4.  Sparks Finance Co., Inc., a Nevada corporation 5.  Cooper Motor Lines, Inc., a South Carolina corporation 6.  Common Market Equipment Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 7.  Swift Transportation Co. of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation 8.  Swift of Texas Co., Inc., a Texas corporation 9.  Swift Logistics Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation 10.  Swift Transportation Corporation, a Nevada corporation 11.  Swift Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation 12.  Sun Merger, Inc., a Tennessee corporation 13.  M.S. Carriers, Inc., a Tennessee corporation 14.  M.S. Carriers Warehousing & Distribution, Inc., a Tennessee corporation 15.  M.S. Carriers Logistics de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation 16.  M.S. Air, Inc., a Tennessee corporation 17.  M.S. Global, Inc., a Nevada corporation 18.  M.S. International, Inc., a Nevada corporation 19.  Swift Transportation of Puerto Rico, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation 20.  Quality Driver Sources Inc., a Tennessee corporation 21.  World Wide Solutions, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation 22.  TransMex, Inc. S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation 23.  Mohave Transportation Captive Insurance Company, an Arizona corporation
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 7047

MALCOLM BEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ISAAC K. FEKETE, d/b/a South Carolina Highway Patrol , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 8:23

- cv - 04782

- HMH

- JDA )

Submitted : February 27 , 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024

Before WILKINSON , WYNN , and HARRIS , Circuit Judges

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Malcolm Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7047 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Malcolm Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order rejecting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss Bey’s initial complaint and remanding to the magistrate judge to consider Bey’s amended complaints, filed after the magistrate judge issued the report and recommendation

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949).
The order Bey seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7047 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Robert J. FLYNN, Relator, v. Alfonso C. SEPE, in his capacity as Judge of the Circuit Court, and E. Wilson Purdy, as Sheriff of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida, Respondents.

No. 73-259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Habeas corpus dismissed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Pamida Holdings  Corporation  and Subsidiary on Form S-8 (File No.  33-83708) of
our report  dated March 26, 1996,  on our audit of the fiscal 1996  consolidated
financial  statements  and  financial  statement  schedule  of  Pamida  Holdings
Corporation  and  Subsidiary as of January 28, 1996 and for the year then ended,
which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Chicago, Illinois
April 29, 1997
Exhibit
32.3

SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

In accordance with Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
of Registrant hereby certifies to his knowledge that this amended annual report
of Registrant on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.

|Date: February 1, 2006 | /s/ Daniel GlassmanDaniel Glassman  Chairman of the Board, President and  Chief Executive
Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this
written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement has been provided to Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
will be retained by Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification
is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 23, 2014

NO. 03-13-00543-CR

Billy Ray Byers, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly resents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor Corporation.

| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph
 Feldschuh, M.D.
| |                            
| |                            
| | Joseph
 Feldschuh, M.D.    
| | President
 and Chief       
| | Executive
 Officer         
| | May 15, 2008               

-16-

---
#### Elliot Ray ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Charles V. HATCHETTE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 3509.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 23, 1971.

*400W. Monroe Stephenson, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.

Hall, Raggio, Farrar & Barnett, Lake Charles, for defendants-appellees.

Before SAVOY, HOOD and CULPEP-PER, JJ.

On Motion to Remand

PER CURIAM.

The defendants-appellees have filed a motion to remand the instant case to the district court for the purpose of traversing the order of the district judge allowing plaintiff-appellant to prosecute this action without payment of costs or the giving of any bond for costs.

By order of court dated December 10, 1962, plaintiff was allowed to file the instant suit in forma pauperis. On January 25, 1971, written reasons for judgment were assigned; and on February 16, 1971, formal judgment was signed. On February 23, 1971, an order was signed by the district judge allowing plaintiff to appeal this case. Nothing is mentioned in the order about the furnishing of a bond.

In Oldham v. Hoover, 140 So.2d 417 (La.App. 1 Cir. 1962), the court said:

> “Our courts have held that where a de-volutive appeal is taken in forma pauper-is *without allowing the appellee sufficient time in which to traverse the affidavits of poverty,*the appellate court may, upon timely application therefor, remand the cause to give the appellee the opportunity to do so. See Brewer v. Theole, 186 La. 168, 171 So. 839; Buckley v. Thibodeaux, 181 La. 416, 159 So. 603.” (Emphasis added.)

In the instant case appellees have had from December 10, 1962, to February 16, 1971, during which to traverse the affidavits in the district court.

We are of the opinion that it would be inequitable to allow defendants to traverse at this late date in view of the length of time they have had to traverse.

For the reasons assigned the motion to remand is denied.

Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          59,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  626,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,500
<INVENTORY>                                    570,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,176
<PP&E>                                       2,797,753
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,640,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,444,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          948,113
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,332
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,491,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,444,555
<SALES>                                        843,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               845,817
<CGS>                                          521,263
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  521,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               286,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                       3,924,356
<SECURITIES>                                 2,459,097
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,802,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                   276,860
<INVENTORY>                                  3,116,993
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,380,447
<PP&E>                                       5,317,909
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,156,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,206,715
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,042,620
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       541,844
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,888,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,206,715
<SALES>                                      9,599,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,599,140
<CGS>                                        7,073,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,359,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,218,487
<INCOME-TAX>                                   405,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            813,487
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   813,487
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-33374, 333-126236, 333-163804) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-166604) of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. of our reports dated March 17, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. and Subsidiaries, which appear on pages 36 and 64, respectively, of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011.

 

/s/ BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 17, 2011

 

----
255 La. 165

#### Albert H. PAXTON v. Willard J. McMIKLE and Charlotte Stanley McMikle.

No. 50315.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 16, 1970.

In re: Willard J. McMikle and Charlotte Stanley McMikle applying for writ of certiorari or review.

Application denied. The ruling complained of is correct.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40200 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
JUAN VENEGAS-ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-274-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 20, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Juan Venegas-Ortega appeals his sentence from his guiltyplea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b)(2). He argues that the district court erred and acted in violation of his right to due process by imposing a sixteen-point enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A) for his Texas felony conviction for possession of cocaine. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellateNo. 98-40200 -2- record. We conclude that the district court did not err in applying § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A), see United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691, 694 (5th Cir. 1997), and that Venegas-Ortega’s constitutional argument, raised for the first time on appeal, is unfounded. See United States v. Pearson , 910 F.2d 221, 223 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32(b)

                          Section 906 Certification
                                    of
                             Mark E. Maddocks

     I certify that the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation with
which this Certification is furnished fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the periodic report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Dataram Corporation.



August 26, 2004,                   MARK E. MADDOCKS

                                   _______________________

                                   Mark E. Maddocks
                                   Vice President, Finance and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7114 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7114

To extend and clarify relief to Federal student loan borrowers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2020

  Mr. Stivers (for himself and Miss Rice of New York) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
Labor, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and clarify relief to Federal student loan borrowers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Economic and Student Loan Debt 
Relief Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. RELIEF FOR FEDERAL STUDENT LOAN BORROWERS.

    (a) Extension of Relief.--Section 3513(a) of the CARES Act (Public 
Law 116-136; 134 Stat. 281) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2020'' and inserting ``December 31, 2020''.
    (b) Notice to Borrowers.--Section 3513(g)(2) of the CARES Act 
(Public Law 116-136; 134 Stat. 281) is amended by striking ``August 1, 
2020'' and inserting ``November 1, 2020''.
    (c) Resuming Repayment.--Section 3513 of the CARES Act (Public Law 
116-136; 134 Stat. 281) is further amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(h) Resuming Repayment.--At the conclusion of the period in which 
the Secretary suspends payments on a loan under subsection (a)--
            ``(1) the loan shall enter or resume repayment status;
            ``(2) the borrower's normal payment obligations shall 
        resume;
            ``(3) beginning on the first day after the conclusion of 
        such period of suspension, interest shall accrue on the loan at 
        the applicable rate of interest in accordance with the terms 
        and conditions of the loan; and
            ``(4) interest that accrues on the loan after the 
        conclusion of such period shall be paid and capitalized (if 
        applicable) in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
        loan.''.

SEC. 3. EXCLUSION FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYER PAYMENTS OF STUDENT LOANS.

    Subparagraph (B) of section 127(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (as amended by section 2206(a) of the CARES Act (Public Law 
116-136; 134 Stat. 281)) is amended by striking ``in the case of 
payments made before January 1, 2021,''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          654381
<SECURITIES>                                    642652
<RECEIVABLES>                                   429194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     400653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2308763
<PP&E>                                         1998957
<DEPRECIATION>                                  862734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4021971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           951129
<BONDS>                                         145536
<COMMON>                                        188371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2542010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4021971
<SALES>                                          79997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5335946
<CGS>                                            54584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    54584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5391627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (86902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     16659
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (103561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (103561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4151]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications Systems; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Electrical and Communications 
Systems (1196).
    Date and Time: March 10 & 11, 1997; 8:30 AM-5:00 PM.
    Place: Room 680 on 3/10 & 11, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Persons: Dr. Rajinder Khosla, Program Director, Physical 
Foundations of Enabling Technologies (PFET), Division of Electrical 
and Communications Systems, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Room 675, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 306-1339.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate **PFET regular research ** 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4151 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M