alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered February 26, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01184-CR

DEMPSTER A. ROSS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-80539-2014

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s February 20, 2015 second motion to extend time to file 

his brief.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has 

not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
#### Jose SALOMON, Appellant, v. MID-STATES MORTGAGE CORP., a Michigan Corporation, Appellee.

No. 77-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 1978.

Max A. Goldfarb, Miami, for appellant.

Krongold & Bass, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In a suit for specific performance, plaintiff, Jose Salomon, appeals an order of the trial court setting aside a default entered against defendant, Mid-States Mortgage Corporation, and also a summary final judgment entered in favor of Mid-States and against plaintiff.

Review of the record discloses that the trial court did not err in setting aside the default against Mid-States. *Heritage Supply Company*v. *Graham,*334 So.2d 840 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); *Associated Medical Institutions, Inc., v. Imperatori,*338 So.2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). The trial court did, however, err in entering a summary final judgment for Mid-States since there are material issues of fact to be decided by the trier of fact.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part with directions.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders

                                                                    Ending
Class            Interest             Principal    Losses           Balance
<S>               <C>                  <C>            <C>           <C>
AR                     0.91              100                0                  0
B1                 75139.39         17046.45                0         1911282.54
B2                 40074.34          9091.44                0         1019350.56
B3                 35065.01             7955                0          891930.99
B4                 15027.89           3409.3                0          382256.71
B5                 25046.49          5682.17                0          637095.21
IA1               486124.27        358794.12                0         58158818.7
IA2               523249.97                0                0           13800000
IA3               2344586.9      17315803.54                0        45084196.46
IA4                       0          3750000                0                  0
IA5               799362.29                0                0           20301266
IA6              1175416.61                0                0           31000000
IA7               507991.85                0                0           13397588
IAX               232582.82                0                0                  0
IIA1             1672296.33       2262791.81                0        42569282.19
IIAP                      0          2708.69                0             110254
IIAX                70196.5                0                0                  0
M                 160297.31         36365.76                0         4077401.24


</TABLE>
# - - UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IV MEMORANDUM 345 COURTLAND STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30365 DATE: SUBJECT: Decision to Transfer Koppers NPL CERCLA Site, Florence, SC from Dual CERCLA/RCRA Coordination to Exclusive RCRA Lead and Responsibility FROM:
THRU:
TO: Richard D. Stonebraker, Chief

## ~ Superfund Branch

### ~~ 

## / ---...:;; Patrick M. Tobin, Director /' 

# -y I O l7 vV Waste Management Division James Scarbrough, Chief Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Branch As per our staff meeting at 11:00 a.m. on August 31, 1987 regarding the Koppers NPL Site in Florence, South Carolina, the Superfund Branch is hereby relinquishing direct control of its oversight responsibilities directed towards implementing a Remedial Action/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) to the RCRA staff. Due to the Site's dual CERCLA/RCRA status and the anticipated filing of a Consent Order under 42 USC Section 3008(h) by RCRA, implementation and enforcement of the evaluation and remedy selection activities (normally covered during the RI/FS process under CERCLA) can be incorporated into the proposed 3008(h) RCRA Consent Order. Coordination and inclusion of pertinent verbage pursuant to the NCP and the SARA amendments ensures full compliance for both programs, but lessens the expense and burden of CERCLA/RCRA coordination by both the Agency and the company. Should you have any questions, feel free to call me at extension 2234.



## uu.JvlJi**~\f '** **r.** 

## k F 

# B**?** 

## 3 ;.. 

# ·, ;-' · U"'- R -")

, " '

.1 t .l' "

. ' \ , It . "'''' t.
< _ • ....-.c..: :;;aG. '-J "**, ~**  

### SC 003**3** 

### 026
#### Charles E. BALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 43037.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 19, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Donald F. Fultz, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argon ST, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 11, 2005   /s/ Donald F. Fultz    Donald F. Fultz  Chief Financial Officer
Amendment No. 1              Exhibit 10.a
                                 ---------------

                         CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.
                         -------------------------------
                  1990 STOCK-BASED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
                  --------------------------------------------

     Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 11 of the Crown Cork & Seal
Company, Inc. 1990 Stock-Based Incentive Compensation Plan ("Plan"),  Crown Cork
& Seal  Company,  Inc.  hereby  amends the Plan,  effective  September 21, 1998,
as follows:

1.       SECTION 8.08 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

         "8.08    Termination by Reason of Retirement or Disability:
                  -------------------------------------------------

          (A)  If a  Holder's  employment  by the  Company  or a  Subsidiary  or
               Affiliate  terminates by reason of disability  (as  determined by
               the  Committee)  any Option held by such Holder may thereafter be
               exercised  by the Holder (or,  where  appropriate,  the  Holder's
               legal  representative),  to the extent it was  exercisable at the
               time of termination or on such accelerated basis as the Committee
               may  determine at or after  grant,  for a period of 3 months from
               the  date  of  such   termination  of  employment  or  until  the
               expiration of the stated term of the Option,  whichever period is
               shorter.

          (B)  If a  Holder's  employment  by the  Company  or a  Subsidiary  or
               Affiliate terminates by reason of Retirement,  any Option held by
               such Holder may  thereafter be exercised by the Holder (or, where
               appropriate,  the Holder's legal representative) to the extent it
               was exercisable at the time of the Holder's Retirement or on such
               accelerated  basis as the  Committee  may  determine  at or after
               grant,  for a period  of up to five  years (as  specified  by the
               Committee),  but only  three  months in the case of an  Incentive
               Stock Option,  from the date of the Holder's  Retirement or until
               the expiration of the stated term of the Option, whichever period
               is shorter."

                                   * * * * * *

     To record the adoption of this  Amendment  No. 1 to the Plan,  Crown Cork &
Seal Company,  Inc. has  authorized its officers to affix its corporate name and
seal effective as of the day and year first above written.


CORPORATE SEAL                              CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.


Attest:                                     By:    /s/ Alan W. Rutherford
                                            Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,002
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                       170
<INVENTORY>                                     12,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,416
<PP&E>                                          26,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,504
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,761
<SALES>                                         27,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,806
<CGS>                                           20,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,086
<INCOME-TAX>                                       431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       655
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
July 20, 2015

Mr. Pascual Pla 

Ferrovial Agroman, US Corp

North America Headquarters

9600 Great Hills Trail, Suite 200E

Austin, TX 78759

Dear Mr. Pla:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 26, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Ferrovial Agroman, US Corp

into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1922), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.
2

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      Exhibit 21


                          LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES:



                          Adams Industries, Inc.
                          Aero International, Inc.
                          Aerospace Bearing Support, Inc.
                          Aircraft Bearing Corporation
                          BAI, Inc.
                          Banner Aero (Australia) Pty, Ltd.
                          Banner Aerospace Foreign Sales Corporation
                          Banner Aerospace Services, Inc.
                          Banner Aerospace-Singapore, Inc.
                          Banner Distribution, Inc.
                          Burbank Aircraft International, GmbH
                          Burbank Aircraft International, Inc.
                          Burbank Aircraft Supply, Inc.
                          DAC International, Inc.
                          Dallas Aerospace, Inc.
                          Discontinued Aircraft, Inc.
                          Discontinued Services, Inc.
                          GCCUS, Inc.
                          Georgetown Jet Center, Inc.
                          Harco Aerospace Fasteners, Ltd.
                          Harco, Inc.
                          Harco Northern Ireland, Ltd.
                          Matrix Aviation, Inc.
                          NASAM, Inc.
                          PacAero
                          PB Herndon Company
                          Professional Aviation Associates, Inc.
                          Solair, Inc.
                          Solair (U.K.) Limited
<page>					EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial conditions results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and




<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: March 30, 2004		BY: /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman
						   Jeffrey A. Rothman
						   President,
			   Demeter Management Corporation,
	   general partner of the
	   registrant
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7035-7036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3731]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[AZ-910-0777-61-241A]


State of Arizona Resource Advisory Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Arizona Resource Advisory Council meeting, notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Arizona Resource 
Advisory Council. The meeting will be held March 20, 1997, beginning at 
8:30 a.m. in the 1A Conference Room at the Bureau of Land Management 
Arizona State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona. The 
agenda items to be covered at the one-day business meeting include 
review of previous meeting minutes; BLM State Director's Update on 
legislation, regulations and statewide planning efforts; Update on the 
Record of Decision of the Statewide Plan Amendment for Arizona 
Standards for Rangeland Health and Guidelines for Grazing Management; 
and Reports by the Recreation and Public Relations Working Groups; 
Reports from RAC members; RAC Discussion on future meeting dates and 
locations. A public comment period will take place at 11:30 a.m. March 
20, 1997 for any interested publics who wish to address the Council.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Deborah Stevens or Ken Mahoney Bureau of Land Management, Arizona

[[Page 7036]]

State Office, 222 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2203, 
(602) 417-9512.
Michael A. Ferguson,
Deputy State Director, Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-3731 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-32-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EVOLUTION, THE SALON SOURCE INC., individually, and as a 50% 

owner, in and on behalf of TRU STAR SALON SERVICES, LLC (d/b/a 

or a/k/a TRUSTAR SALON SERVICES LLC),

Appellants,

v.

JEFFREY EVAN COHEN, et al.,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-3195

[September 1, 2022]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Paige Hardy Gillman, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 502021CA006688.

Michael H. Maizes of Maizes & Maizes LLP, Boca Raton, Mark D. Gilwit 

of Gilwit Law, Boca Raton, Adam M. Balkan of Balkan & Patterson, LLP, 

Boca Raton, and Carlos F. Osorio, Warren Daniel Zaffuto and Andres F. 

Rey of Osorio Internacional, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Jeffrey A. Hirsch, Paul B. Ranis and John L. McManus of Greenberg 

Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Brigid F. Cech Samole and Katherine 

M. Clemente of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.