alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PFS - 12.31.2013 EX 10.20






EXHIBIT 10.22




Written Description of Provident Financial Services, Inc.’s 
2014 Annual Cash Incentive Plan
    




2014 Cash Incentive Compensation Plan.  On January 30, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors, on the recommendation of its Compensation Committee, approved an annual performance-based incentive plan for the payment of incentive cash compensation to certain officers (including senior executive officers) and employees of The Provident Bank, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary (the “Plan”).  The Plan provides for cash incentive payments based primarily on the Company’s 2014 financial performance compared with certain targets (the “Corporate Targets”).  Incentive Payments based on the Company’s 2014 financial performance may be made if the Company meets or exceeds 95% of any of the Corporate Targets (“Threshold”).  


For senior executive officers (including the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer), 100% of the incentive payment that may be made under the Plan will be based on the Company’s 2014 performance using the following Corporate Targets that relate to the Company’s business plan and strategic objectives: (i) earnings per share (weighted 25%); (ii) net income (weighted 25%); (iii) efficiency ratio (weighted 25%); and (iv) return on average assets (weighted 25%).   


For other officers and employees eligible to participate in the Plan, a portion of the incentive payment that may be made under the Plan will be based on the Company’s 2014 performance using the same Corporate Targets.  A portion of the incentive payment will also be based on individual performance against personal goals and objectives, and may be paid whether or not Corporate Targets have been met.  


Incentive payments will be a percentage of the employee’s base salary.  Using estimated 2014 base salary levels and the current number of employees that could participate in the Plan (485 persons), the total cash incentive payments that may be made for 2014 would range from approximately $2.4 million at the Threshold level up to $13.1 million at the Maximum level.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            THE BANKER'S STORE, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February 28, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                            By: /s/ PAUL D. CLARK
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Paul D. Clark,
                                                President and CEO
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)


April 19, 2004
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

O ctober 18 , 2016 

# Order

Clerk October 18 , 2016

15 4 029 ( 58 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 15 4 029

v COA: 3 25640

Wayne CC: 1 4

- 0 06694

- F H

GREGORY LAMONT GLENN, JR.

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing his reply in support of the superseding application for leave to appeal is

GRANTED. The reply submitted on October 11, 2016, is accepted for fil ing

.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6587-6588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3497]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB Review

summary: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Railroad Retirement Board has submitted the 
following proposal(s) for the collection of information to the Office 
of Management and Budget for review and approval.

summary of proposal(s):
    (1) Collection title: Nonresident Questionnaire.
    (2) Form(s) submitted: RRB-1001.
    (3) OMB Number: 3220-0145.
    (4) Expiration date of current OMB clearance: March 31, 1997.
    (5) Type of request: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    (6) Respondents: Individuals or households.
    (7) Estimated annual number of respondents: 1,700.
    (8) Total annual responses: 1,700.
    (9) Total annual reporting hours: 108.
    (10) Collection description: Under the Railroad Retirement Act, the 
benefits payable to an annuitant living outside the United States may 
be subject to withholding under Public Laws 98-21

[[Page 6588]]

and 98-76. The form obtains the information needed to determine the 
amount to be withheld.

additional information or comments: Copies of the form and supporting 
documents can be obtained from Chuck Mierzwa, the agency clearance 
officer (312-751-3363). Comments regarding the information collection 
should be addressed to Ronald J. Hodapp, Railroad Retirement Board, 844 
North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611-2092 and the OMB reviewer, 
Laura Oliven (202-395-7316), Office of Management and Budget, Room 
10230, New Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. 20503.
Chuck Mierzwa,
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3497 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
EXHIBIT
23





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board
of Directors


Benchmark
Electronics, Inc.:




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-61660, No. 333-26805, No. 333-28997, No. 333-54186, No. 333-66889,
No. 333-103183, No. 333-101744, No. 333-136798, and No. 333-156202) on Form S-8
of Benchmark Electronics, Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Benchmark Electronics, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and
the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Benchmark
Electronics, Inc. Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for
uncertain tax positions in 2007.




KPMG
LLP




Houston,
Texas


February
27, 2009
#### Floyd B. BREWINGTON, Appellant, v. Roger LANGSTON and Margaret Langston, his wife, Appellees.

No. 72-911.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany the  Registrant's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
January 31, 2004:

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Del Global  Technologies  Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
V.  Gilboy,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350,  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 that to my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            Section  15(d),  as applicable,  of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
            1934, as amended; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                           /s/ Thomas V. Gilboy
                                          -------------------------
                                          Name: Thomas V. Gilboy
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          Date: March 15, 2004

      (1)   A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906
            has  been  provided  to Del  Global  Technologies  Corp  and will be
            retained  by Del Global  Technologies  Corp.  and  furnished  to the
            Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

            The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
            U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
            as a separate disclosure document.
```
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

SEP 2 Z 2015 

Mr. Douglas M. Lane 

Director, Regulatory Administration 

The Boeing Company 

PO Box 3707, MC 03-56 

Seattle, Washington 98124-2207 

Dear Mr. Lane: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

We have received Boeing's letter dated August 28, 2015, requesting an extension to TimeLimited Exemption 11 070B. That amendment to Exemption 11 070A extended relief from 

the requirements of§ 25.939(a) at Amendment 25-40, until December 31 , 2015. In the 

current petition, Boeing requests that the FAA extend the relief granted in Exemption 

11070B to September 30, 2016 (an additional 9 months), for GEnx-2B powered Model 747-

8 and 747-8F airplanes that have not been issued an original airworthiness certificate prior to 

that date, in order to demonstrate full compliance with§ 25.939(a). 

This request was posted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management 

System (at Regulations.gov) on September 4, 2015, and has been added to Docket No. FAA2014-0299. 

We are in the process of reviewing this request and will contact Boeing if we need 

additional information. If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the 

petition process, please contact Mr. Mike Dostert at (425) 227-2132, or by e-mail at 

Mike.Dostert@faa. gov. 

Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
Exhibit 10.7

Promissory Note

On this date of October 7, 2009, in return for
valuable consideration received, the undersigned borrower promises to pay to Seatac Digital Resources, Inc., the Lender, the sum of One-Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), together with interest thereon at the rate of five percent
(5%) percent per annum.

Payable On Demand: The entire unpaid principal and accrued interest thereon, if any, shall become
immediately due and payable on demand by the holder of this Note.

Default - In the event of default, the borrower agrees to pay all
costs and expenses incurred by the Lender, including all reasonable attorney fees (including both hourly and contingent attorney fees as permitted by law) for the collection of this Note upon default, and including reasonable collection charges
(including, where consistent with industry practices, a collection charge set as a percentage of the outstanding balance of this Note) should collection be referred to a collection agency.

Acceleration of Debt - In the event that the borrower fails to make any payment due under the terms of this Note, or breach any condition relating to
any security, security agreement, note, mortgage or lien granted as collateral security for this Note, seeks relief under the Bankruptcy Code, or suffers an involuntary petition in bankruptcy or receivership not vacated within thirty (30) days,
the entire balance of this Note and any interest accrued thereon shall be immediately due and payable to the holder of this Note.

Modification - No modification or waiver of any of the terms of this Agreement shall be allowed unless by written agreement signed by both parties. No waiver of any breach or default hereunder shall be deemed a waiver of any
subsequent breach or default of the same or similar nature.

Transfer of the Note - The borrowers hereby waive any notice of the
transfer of this Note by the Lender or by any subsequent holder of this Note, agree to remain bound by the terms of this Note subsequent to any transfer, and agree that the terms of this Note may be fully enforced by any subsequent holder of this
Note.

Severability of Provisions - In the event that any portion of this Note is deemed unenforceable, all other provisions of this
Note shall remain in full force and effect.

Choice of Law - All terms and conditions of this Note shall be interpreted under the laws
of The State of California.

Dated: October 7, 2009



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/    Robert Cambridge                
|Americas Minority Health Network, Inc.
|Borrower
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           15259
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    34396
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1450
<INVENTORY>                                      36069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 89530
<PP&E>                                           26662
<DEPRECIATION>                                   18096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  128642
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35455
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          8785
<OTHER-SE>                                       39095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    128642
<SALES>                                          61319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            23809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    55005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    52
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 822
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5492
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3295
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Margaret LOCKHART and Buel Lockhart, her husband, Appellants, v. Nellie PRUDOT and James Prudot, her husband, Appellees.

No. 73-217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 16, 1974.

David A. Maney of Gordon & Maney, P.A., and Edward J. Hunter, Tampa, for appellants.

John R. Bush and Ted R. Manry, III, of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, and John R. Parkhill, Tampa, for appel-lees.

*285GRIMES, Judge.

This case was originally tried before a jury which returned a verdict of zero damages for pain and suffering. On appeal, this court held that the verdict could be sustained because the injury was not objectively verifiable.1 However, the case was remanded for another reason.

On the last morning of the trial, one of the jurors, on his way to the courthouse, was involved in a rear-end collision of much the same kind as that which gave rise to this. suit. He told his fellow jurors of his experience. The trial judge’s investigation into the incident was limited to an inquiry of the juror involved in the accident. This court concluded that there remained the question of whether the other jurors were improperly influenced. The case was remanded with directions to conduct a more extensive inquiry. The court said:

> “ . . .If the absence of influence can be shown the verdict should be allowed to stand; if not, a new trial should be awarded. . . . ”

Upon remand, a hearing was held at which each of the remaining jurors was separately interrogated. The judge concluded that none of the jurors had been influenced by any statements of their fellow juror with respect to his accident and entered an order pursuant to mandate in which he denied a new trial.

The procedure followed below complies with our mandate, and the order under review is amply supported by the record. Each of the jurors testified with certainty that his verdict was in no way influenced by any comments of the juror concerning his auto accident. The judge properly prohibited plaintiff’s counsel from attempting to inquire into all of the matters that were considered by the jurors in their deliberations.

The order is affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.

1

. Lockhart v. Prudot, Fla.App. 2nd 1972, 271 So.2d 157.
Exhibit 10.75

 

2011 Plan — US certificate

 

	
Restricted   Stock Unit Award Certificate
    	

    
	
(Time Vesting Only)
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
ID: XXXXXXXX
    
	
 
    	
Connaught House
    
	
 
    	
1 Burlington Rd.
    
	
 
    	
Dublin 4, Ireland
    


 

	
«FIRST_NAME» «MIDDLE_NAME» «LAST_NAME»
    	
Option Number:
    
	
«ADDRESS_LINE_1»
    	
Plan:
    
	
«ADDRESS_LINE_2»
    	
 
    
	
«ADDRESS_LINE_3»
    	
 
    
	
«CITY», «STATE»   «ZIP_CODE»
    	
ID:
    


 

Effective «GRANT_DATE», you have been granted a Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) award.  The RSU award is for a total of «SHARES_GRANTED» shares of Alkermes plc. (the “Company”) ordinary shares.

 

The RSU award is granted under and is governed by the terms and conditions of this Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate and the Alkermes plc 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Unless otherwise defined in this Award Certificate, all capitalized terms shall be as defined in the Plan.

 

The right to acquire the shares subject to the RSU award will become fully vested according to the following vesting schedule:

 

*** ADD VESTING SCHEDULE***

 

You must be employed by the Company on a vesting date in order to receive the RSU award shares that vest on that date.  For the purpose of the terms of this RSU award, you will be deemed to be employed by the Company so long as you remain employed by a company which continues to be a subsidiary of the Company.

 

In the event of the termination of your employment with the Company (but not the termination of a non-employment relationship with the Company) by reason of death or permanent disability, the RSU award shall vest in full on such termination of employment.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Alkermes plc.
    	
 
    	
Date
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3902]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management


Lewistown, MT, District Office; Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Lewistown District Office.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A sub-committee of the Lewistown District Resource Advisory 
Council will meet February 26, 1997, at 10:00 am, in the Conference 
Room at the Lewistown District Bureau of Land Management Office, on 
Airport Road in Lewistown.
    This sub-committee was empowered by the full Resource Advisory 
Council (during a February 4-5, 1997 meeting) to meet and revise the 
council's recommendations concerning standards and guidelines for 
rangeland management.
    There will be a public comment period at 11:30 am during the 
February 26, 1997 meeting.

DATES: February 26, 1997.

LOCATION: Lewistown District Bureau of Land Management Office, Airport 
Road, Lewistown.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: District Manager, (406) 538-7461, 
Lewistown District Office, Bureau of Land Management, Box 1160, Airport 
Road, Lewistown, MT 59457.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The sub-committee meeting is open to the 
public and there will be a public comment period as detailed above.

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
David L. Mari,
District Manager.
[FR Doc. 97-3902 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Special Emphasis Panel in Geosciences: Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in the Geosciences (1756).
    Date and Time: March 11-12, 1997, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 770, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Stephan P. Nelson, Program Director for the 
Mesoscale Dynamic Meteorology Program; Division of Atmospheric 
Sciences; Room 775; 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230; 
telephone number (703) 306-1526.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the U.S. Weather Research Program 
(USWRP) preliminary proposals as part of the selection process for 
awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempted under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) 
and (6) of the Government Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4313 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 10.1

​
​
​
​
​
​
November 1, 2021
Steven Worth, Interim President and CEO
OneSpan
Dear Steven,
On October 29, 2021, the Board, by unanimous written consent, approved an increase in your fee from $20,000 to $50,000 per month for each month or portion thereof that you serve as Interim President and CEO, effective October 1, 2021.
Thank you for your continued performance in this role.
Sincerely,
/s/ Jan Kees van Gaalen
Jan Kees van Gaalen
Interim Chief Financial Officer

OneSpan Inc. 121 W Wacker Drive, Suite 2050, Chicago, IL, 60601, United States
P +1 312 766 4001 info@onespan.com OneSpan.com