alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

__________________________________________

)

)

In the Matter of ) Docket No. 9350

)

Graco Inc., et al. ) PUBLIC DOCUMENT

)

__________________________________________)

WITHDRAWAL OF RESPONDENT GRACO INC.’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW 

IN RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S MOTION TO PLACE THE 

UNREDACTED COMPLAINT ON THE PUBLIC RECORD

01 30 2012
2

In light of the ruling of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 

Respondent Graco Inc. will not continue to oppose the motion to place the unredacted complaint 

on the public record and hereby withdraws its Memorandum of Law in Response to Complaint 

Counsel’s Motion to Place the Unredacted Complaint on the Public Record. 

Graco restates its continued opposition to the disclosure of Graco’s confidential 

information to the extent that such disclosure causes Graco serious injury or violates the terms of 

the Protective Order.

Dated: January 27, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

s/ Richard A. Duncan 

John H. Hinderaker

Richard A. Duncan

FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP

2200 Wells Fargo Center

90 South Seventh Street

Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901

(612) 766-7000

(612) 766-1600 (fax)

and

Richard G. Parker

Michael E. Antalics

Katrina M. Robson

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 

1625 Eye Street, NW

Washington, DC 20006

(202) 383-5300

(202) 383-5414 (fax)

Attorneys for Respondent 

Graco Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on January 27, 2012, I have caused the foregoing Withdrawal of Respondent

Graco Inc.’s Memorandum of Law in Response to Complaint Counsel’s Motion to Unseal the 

Unredacted Complaint to be served by email upon Phillip Broyles (pbroyles@ftc.gov), Peter 

Richman (prichman@ftc.gov), Marc Schneider (mschneider@ftc.gov), and Amanda Hamilton 

(ahamilton1@ftc.gov) of the Federal Trade Commission; and upon J. Robert Robertson 

(robby.robertson@hoganlovells.com), Logan Breed (Logan.Breed@hoganlovells.com), and 

Meghan Edwards-Ford (Meghan.Edwards-Ford@hoganlovells.com) of Hogan Lovells US LLP,

counsel for Illinois Tool Works Inc. and Illinois Tool Works Finishing LLC. 

I also emailed a courtesy copy of the foregoing to secretary@ftc.gov and oalj@ftc.gov

and caused a copy to be filed via ECF.

Matthew M. Martin (MNBN 989341)

s/ Matthew M. Martin______________

Faegre Baker Daniels LLP

2200 Wells Fargo Center

90 South Seventh Street

Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901

(612) 766-7000

(612) 766-1600 (fax)

Attorney for Graco Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydron Technologies, Inc.
(the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2007, hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
Registrant.

                            HYDRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
                               /s/: David Pollock
                               ------------------
                                  David Pollock
       Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                 August 13, 2007
O~.~ l' \\ ii J ~~

J~ ~\mt~ 'š

" '" in ti ~ \: .''\,.1 :i'~ ~

~ ~ \~ §~O~~\ h~

d? "1/ 1'/..

::';¡-; i.', (ì f":.,\,

j--lll1%/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES

In the Matter of

)

)

)

)

)

)

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Docket No. 9327

Respondent.

ORDER GRATING ENERSYS' MOTION TO

EXTEND TIME TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS

On Januar 20,2009, non-part EnerSys submitted its Motion to Extend Time to Produce

Documents ("Motion"). EnerSys provided a certificate of conference indicating that EnerSys

was unable to reach an agreement with either Respondent or Complaint Counsel on the issues

raised by the motion. By Order dated January 22, 2009, the paries were directed to file their

oppositions, if any, by 12:00 p.m., January 23,2009.

On January 23,2009, Respondent filed its Response to EnerSys' Motion to Extend Time

to Produce Documents. Respondent asserts that EnerSys has not yet complied with the subpoena

duces tecum served on EnerSys by Respondent and that Respondent needs these documents in a

timely maner. Respondent further asserts that it cannot afford any further delay in receiving

documents from EnerSys, as important deadlines in the Scheduling Order are approaching.

In a supplemental statement of counsel filed by EnerSys on Januar 23,2009, EnerSys

states that it has conferred with Complaint Counsel and that Complaint Counsel has no objection

to allowing EnerSys an additional ten days to produce the documents responsive to Respondent's

subpoena. EnerSys further states that Complaint Counsel has authorized EnerSys to represent

that Complaint Counsel does not intend to file a response to the instant mdtion.

In its motion, EnerSys states that because of the substantial volume of documents

gathered and other specified circumstances, EnerSys is unable to produce the documents within

the time frame ordered. EnerSys has sufficiently demonstrated the need for the requested

extension.

EnerSys' motion is GRANTED. EnerSys shall have an additional ten days to produce

the responsive documents. Respondent's concerns about its ability to meet upcoming deadlines
in the Scheduling Order wil be addressed in an order on Respondent's pending Motion to

Amend the Scheduling Order.

ORDERED: ~à",¿

D. Michael Chappell

Administrative Law Judge

Date: Januar 23,2009

2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy J. DORMAN, Jr.

No. 62741.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 26, 1978.

In re: Roy J. Dorman, Jr., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and for a stay order. Parish of Caddo.

Writ denied. No abuse of discretion.
#### Florida N. HAYMAN, as Administratrix of the Estate of Marie A. Kennard, Deceased, Appellant, v. BAYFRONT MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Appellee.

No. 71-150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 7, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EX-10.28



 Exhibit 10.28 
  





 
 September 26, 2012 

Dennis Sheehan 
 RE: Promotion 

Dear Dennis: 
 Congratulations! This letter is to
confirm our discussions and to formally document our agreement on your promotion to Sr. Vice President, Sales and Marketing. The effective date of the change is October 1, 2012. 

Your new annual base salary is $250,000.00 and your target incentive under the 2012 Executive Incentive Plan is 60%. These changes will be in effect
October 1, 2012. 
 Also, effective upon board approval, the Company will grant you 50,000 RSUs of the Company’s Common Stock pursuant to the
Company’s stock incentive plan and standard stock agreement. The RSUs vest annually over a 3 year period. 
 Dennis, I’m confident
that in your new role as Sr. Vice President, Sales and Marketing you will help drive Immersion to success. Please be reminded that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this letter or any other agreement between us, your employment with us is
on an “at will” basis, and may be terminated at any time, with or without cause and with or without notice. 
 Please sign the
enclosed copy of this letter in the space indicated as your acceptance of the terms and return it to Human Resources. Your signed acceptance will become our binding agreement with respect to the subject matter of this letter. 

 

			
	 Sincerely,

	
	 /s/ Victor Viegas

	 Victor Viegas

	 President and Chief Executive Officer


  

					
	Agreed and Accepted	 		 	
			
	 X /s/ Dennis Sheehan
	 		 	9/26/2012                    
	Dennis Sheehan	 		 	Date
#### Stanley S. PHILLIPS, Petitioner, v. THE FLORIDA BAR, Respondent.

No. 41901.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 12, 1972.

Stanley S. Phillips, pro se.

Norman A. Faulkner, Tallahassee, for The Florida Bar, respondent.

PER CURIAM:

The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar has filed herein its recommendation for reinstatement to The Florida Bar of Petitioner Stanley S. Phillips, confirming the Referee’s favorable report and recommendations, pursuant to Integration Rule 11.11(10), 32 F.S.A.

It appears therefrom that petitioner’s conduct has been exemplary and that he would conduct his activities as a member of The Florida Bar in a highly ethical and competent manner. Upon the Referee’s report and the recommendation for reinstatement by the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, it is

Ordered that Petitioner Stanley S. Phillips be and he is hereby reinstated as a member of The Florida Bar.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                             Financial Data Schedule
                  Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K Commercial and
                Industrial Companies Article 5 of Regulation S-X
                (Dollars is thousands, except per share amounts)

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Consolidated  Balance Sheet of Pamida  Holdings and Subsidiary as of January 31,
1999 and the related Consolidated  Statement of Operations for the 52 weeks then
ended  and  is  qualified  in  its  entirety  by  reference  to  such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000864760
<NAME>                         Pamida Holdings Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                               7,588
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                            50
<INVENTORY>                                        180,063
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   201,474
<PP&E>                                              46,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                      18,024
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     298,215
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              158,145
<BONDS>                                            176,167
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                90
<OTHER-SE>                                         (47,629)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       298,215
<SALES>                                            672,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   672,394
<CGS>                                              504,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      639,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25,847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      7,433
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,887
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .50
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           CYRK, INC. SUBSIDIARIES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Subsidiary                  Jurisdiction of Incorporation      Ownership
------------------                  -----------------------------      ---------
<S>                                 <C>                               <C>
Cyrk Europe Limited                 United Kingdom                     100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Super Premium Limited               British Virgin Islands             100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Far East, Inc.                 British Virgin Islands             100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk (H.K.) Limited                 Hong Kong                          100% owned by Cyrk Far East, Inc.
Cyrk Marketing Services, Inc.       Canada                             100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk Acquisition Corp.              Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
CXDATA, Inc.                        Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Global Sourcing and Risk
     Group, Inc.                    Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk/Tonkin Europe LTD              United Kingdom                     100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Tonkin, Inc.                        Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Cyrk CPG Corp.                      Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Creative Premium
     Manufacturing, Inc.            Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk CPG Corp.
Loyalty Management, Inc.            Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
NewModel, Inc.                      Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Simon Marketing, Inc.               Delaware                           100% owned by Cyrk, Inc.
Simon Marketing (Hong Kong)
     Limited                        Hong Kong                          100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Ventures, Inc.                California                         100% owned by Simon Marketing, Inc.
Simon Marketing Consulting
     (Canada) Limited               Canada                             100% owned by Simon Ventures, Inc.
Simon Marketing International
     GmbH                           Germany                            100% owned by Simon Ventures International LTD
Simon Marketing International
     Limited                        United Kingdom                     100% owned by Simon Marketing
                                                                       International GmbH
Simon Marketing International
     Services Limited               United Kingdom                     100% owned by Simon Ventures International
                                                                       LTD
Simon Marketing East Limited        Hong Kong                          100% owned by Simon Marketing (H.K.) LTD
Simon Ventures International        United Kingdom                     100% owned by Simon Ventures, Inc.
     Limited
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3939]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Division 
of Extramural Activities; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel (Telephone Conference Call).
    Date: February 25, 1997.
    Time: 1:00 p.m.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 7550 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Room 9C10, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Dr. Howard Weinstein/Mr. Phillip Wiethorn, 
Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, 7550 
Wisconsin Avenue, Room 9C10, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9223.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate one SBIR Phase I Topic 
022 Contract Proposal.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 522b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications 
and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.853, Clinical 
Research Related to Neurological Disorders; No. 93.854, Biological 
Basis Research in the Neurosciences)

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-3939 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### Sylvia CASTILLO, Petitioner, v. David SACHS, Respondent.

No. 43283.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 22, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 271 So.2d 487.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3872]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

National Committee on Foreign Medical Education and 
Accreditation; Meeting

AGENCY: National Committee on Foreign Medical Education and 
Accreditation, Education.

ACTION: Amendment of notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice published on January 28, 1997, 
Volume 62, page 4038. The purpose of this amendment is to change the 
time that the meeting will be convened on March 3, 1997, from 9 a.m. to 
1:30 p.m. The location and matters to be considered are not changed.

DATES AND TIMES: Monday, March 3, 1997, 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., and 
Tuesday, March 4, 1997, from 9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carol F. Sperry, Executive Director, National Committee on Foreign 
Medical Education and Accreditation, 7th and D Streets, SW., Room 3905, 
ROB #3, Washington, DC 20202-7563. Telephone: (202) 260-3636.
David A. Longanecker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 97-3872 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-M
#### Woodrow MASON, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, etc. et al., Respondents.

No. U-219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 11, 1973.

Woodrow Mason, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Donald K. Rudser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, together with the return thereto filed by respondent, the rule nisi heretofore issued is dissolved. The petitioner having failed to demonstrate error in the proceedings below, his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is accordingly denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7208 

To amend the Small Business Act to include hospitals serving rural areas 

or areas of persistent poverty in the paycheck protection program, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2020 

Mr. GUEST (for himself, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. HAGEDORN, Mr. 

THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina, Mr. BYRNE, 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. WILLIAMS, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. DAVID P. 

ROE of Tennessee, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. STEWART, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. 

KUSTOFF of Tennessee, and Mr. PALAZZO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to include hospitals serving rural areas or areas of persistent poverty in the 

paycheck protection program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘PPP Access for Rural 

5 Hospitals Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7208 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CRITICAL CARE HOSPITALS IN THE 

2 PAYCHECK PROTECTION PROGRAM. 

3 (a) ELIGIBILITY OF HOSPITALS WITH MORE THAN

4 ONE PHYSICAL LOCATION.—Section 7(a)(36)(D)(iii) of 

5 the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(36)(D)(iii)) is 

6 amended by striking ‘‘beginning with 72’’ and inserting 

7 the following: ‘‘beginning with 72 (or, in the case of a crit8 ical care hospital, is assigned a North American Industry 

9 Classification System code beginning with 62)’’. 

10 (b) WAIVER OF AFFILIATION RULES.—Section 

11 7(a)(36)(D)(iv)(I) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

12 636(a)(36)(D)(iv)(I)) is amended by striking ‘‘beginning 

13 with 72’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘beginning with 72 

14 (or, in the case of a critical care hospital, is assigned a 

15 North American Industry Classification System code be16 ginning with 62)’’. 

17 (c) CRITICAL CARE HOSPITALS DEFINED.—Section 

18 7(a)(36)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

19 636(a)(36)(D)) is amended by adding at the end the fol20 lowing new clause: 

21 ‘‘(vii) CRITICAL CARE HOSPITAL DE22 FINED.—In this clause, the term ‘critical 

23 care hospital’ means a hospital (as defined 

24 in section 1861(e) of the Social Security 

25 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(e))) that— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7208 IH

1 ‘‘(I) is located in a county (or 

2 equivalent unit of local government) 

3 in a rural area, as defined in section 

4 1886(d)(2)(D) of the Social Security 

5 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(2)(D)), is 

6 treated as being located in a rural 

7 area pursuant to section 

8 1886(d)(8)(E) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1395ww(d)(8)(E)), or is a critical ac10 cess hospital, as defined in section 

11 1861(mm)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

12 1395x(mm)(1)); or 

13 ‘‘(II) for the most recent cost re14 porting period under section 1886(d) 

15 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 1395ww(d)), received an additional 

17 payment under section 1886(d)(5)(F) 

18 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

19 1395ww(d)(5)(F)).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS