alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7121 

To authorize appropriations for the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund providing financial assistance and technical assistance for 

the benefit of certain minority communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2020 

Ms. ADAMS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To authorize appropriations for the Community Development 

Financial Institutions Fund providing financial assistance and technical assistance for the benefit of certain 

minority communities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL INSTI4 TUTIONS FUND. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro6 priated to the Community Development Financial Institu7 tions Fund, out of amounts in the general fund not other8 wise appropriated, $5,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2020, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7121 IH

1 for providing financial assistance and technical assistance 

2 under subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 108(a)(1) of 

3 the Community Development Banking and Financial In4 stitutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4707(a)(1)), except that 

5 subsections (d) and (e) of such section 108 shall not apply 

6 to the provision of such assistance, for the Bank Enter7 prise Award program, and for financial assistance, tech8 nical assistance, training, and outreach programs designed 

9 to benefit Native American, Native Hawaiian, and Alaska 

10 Native communities and provided primarily through quali11 fied community development lender organizations with ex12 perience and expertise in community development banking 

13 and lending in Indian country, Native American organiza14 tions, Tribes and Tribal organizations, and other suitable 

15 providers. Of the amount appropriated pursuant to this 

16 heading, not less than $2,000,000,000 shall be for pro17 viding financial assistance, technical assistance, awards, 

18 training, and outreach programs described above to recipi19 ents that are minority lending institutions. 

20 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

21 (1) MINORITY LENDING INSTITUTION.—The 

22 term ‘‘minority lending institution’’ means any de23 pository institution, loan fund, or other financial in24 stitution that— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7121 IH

1 (A) if a privately owned institution, 51 

2 percent is owned by one or more socially and 

3 economically disadvantaged individuals; 

4 (B) if publicly owned, 51 percent of the 

5 stock is owned by one or more socially and eco6 nomically disadvantaged individuals; and 

7 (C) in the case of a mutual institution, 

8 where the majority of the Board of Directors, 

9 account holders, and the community which it 

10 services is predominantly minority. 

11 (2) MINORITY.—The term ‘‘minority’’ means 

12 any black American, Native American, Hispanic 

13 American, or Asian American. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I,
Richard J. DePiano, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Escalon Medical
Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1.   The Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended June 30,
              2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents,
              in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

Date: September 26, 2003                   /s/ Richard J. DePiano
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Richard J. DePiano
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Escalon Medical Corp. and will
be retained by Escalon Medical Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      F-31
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Stephen Feldschuh, Chief
Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations certify that: I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Daxor Corporation; Based on my
knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant
and have: (a) Designed
  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
  effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
  period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
  financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
  quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
  affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and(b) Any fraud,
  whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
  a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
  reporting.  Date: August
  14, 2006/s/ Stephen
  FeldschuhStephen
  Feldschuh
  Vice President of Operations and
  Chief Financial Officer 14
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

t1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

147708

ABUNDANT LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTER, a/k/a

ABUNDANT LIFE CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 147708

COA: 310713

MTT: 00-382316

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF REDFORD,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 1, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Erik H. van der Kaay, President and Chief Executive Officer of Datum Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)     the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
        period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

Dated:   August 14, 2002


                                       /s/ Erik H. van der Kaay
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Erik H. van der Kaay
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of Public Health and Science; Notice of Partnership 
Initiative

    Pursuant to Title XVII of the Public Health Service Act, notice is 
hereby given that the Office of Disease Prevention and Health 
Promotion, Office of Public Health and Science, is seeking partnerships 
with non-Federal organizations to promote, distribute and encourage the 
implementation of ``Put Prevention into Practice.'' ``Put Prevention 
into Practice'' is a system-based approach to implementing the 
recommendations of the United States Preventive Services Task Force, 
targeting patients, clinicians, and medical offices. The goal is to 
increase the impact of ``Put Prevention into Practice'' by forming 
partnerships with private sector organizations. These cooperative 
efforts are intended to bring the resources of several partners to bear 
on the implementation of clinical preventive services guidelines and on 
the efforts to increase the delivery of appropriate clinical preventive 
services, efforts that are too complex for any one organization to 
handle alone. Organizations with particular experience, expertise or 
interest in the development, marketing and distribution of prevention-
related materials to the general public, professional organizations and 
managed care organizations will be well-aligned with current and 
planned initiatives of ``Put Prevention into Practice'' activities.

    Note: Partnerships between ODPHP and outside organizations will 
be formalized through Memorandum of Agreements and will not involve 
grants or contracts.

    Date of Effectiveness: February 19, 1997.
    For more information, please contact Rika Maeshiro, M.D., M.P.H., 
Senior Clinical Affairs Advisor, Office of Disease Prevention and 
Health Promotion, Office of Public Health and Science, at 202-690-7943.

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
Claude Earl Fox,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Health (Disease Prevention and Health 
Promotion).
[FR Doc. 97-4039 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-M
Exhibit 32(b)

                          Section 906 Certification
                                    of
                             Mark E. Maddocks

     I certify that the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation with
which this Certification is furnished fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the periodic report
fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Dataram Corporation.



December 9, 2003                   MARK E. MADDOCKS

                                   _______________________

                                   Mark E. Maddocks
                                   Vice President, Finance and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
Green Guides Twitter Chat Transcript 

On October 1, 2012, the FTC announced final revisions to the Green Guides. Staff took to 

Twitter answer questions from the public about the revisions. The chat was scheduled from 

2:00-3:00pm ET. Participants used the hashtag #FTCgreen. 

All tweets (without handles redacted) remain public on the @FTC Twitter account. 

Tweets are posted below in chronological order for ease of reading. 

Promotional Tweets 

Reminder: FTC staff to host media call-in on Green Guides @ 12pm ET. Twitter chat for public 

Qs @ 2pm: http://go.usa.gov/YrDT #FTCgreen 

Joining us for our Green Guides Twitter chat at 2pm ET? Learn more about how our chats work: 

http://go.usa.gov/YYzR #FTCgreen 

If you're joining us for our Green Guides chat at 2pm, here's a summary that may help you: 

http://go.usa.gov/YYsV #FTCgreen 

We're starting our Twitter Chat soon! You can start submitting questions now to #FTCgreen. 

Qs and As 

Hi all! FTC staff attorneys Laura Koss & Julia Solomon Ensor here to answer questions on revised 

Green Guides. #FTCgreen 

Q1: RT What are some of the consequences of clearly violating the Green 

Guides? #FTCgreen 

A1: FTC can sue under Section 5 of the FTC Act. Goal is to stop deceptive ads. List of recent 

cases: http://go.usa.gov/YgCC #FTCgreen 

Q2: RT #FTCgreen How many green-related cases did the FTC rule on last 

year? 

A2: So far in 2012, the FTC announced 6 enforcement actions with more in the pipeline. See: 

http://go.usa.gov/YgCR #FTCgreen 

Q3: RT how should companies that sell their RECs from onsite systems but 

buy replacement RECs make claims? #FTCgreen 

A3: For guidance on renewable energy claims based on recs, see p. 216: http://go.usa.gov/YYHP

& Sec 260.15: http://go.usa.gov/YYsh #FTCgreen 
Q4: RT Given the 5 cases and 14 warnings, why isn't there a section in the 

new Guides on 'Up To" claims? #FTCgreen 

A4: Guides can't address every applicable claim. For information on "up to" claims, see FTC 

study: http://go.usa.gov/Ygrm #FTCgreen 

Q5: RT How many comments did the FTC receive on the 2010 proposal? #FTCgreen 

A5: We received 340 non duplicative comments & over 5,000 form comments. #FTCgreen 

Q6: MT "examples don't illustrate all permissible claims" does that mean 

if no example, guides don't apply? #FTCgreen 

A6: Guides provide some examples, but not only way 2 make non-deceptive claims. Gen 

principles apply. 260.3: http://go.usa.gov/YYsh #FTCgreen 

Q7: RT Will the FTC compile a list of the organizations that qualify as "third-party 

certifiers" of green standards? #FTCgreen 

A7: The FTC does not maintain a list of third party certifiers. See p.111: http://go.usa.gov/YYHP

#FTCgreen 

Q8: RT Does the manufacturer have to have original data in their own files to 

make the claim? #FTCgreen 

A8: Marketers need to have substantiation before disseminating claims. May need to ask 

supplier for their substantiation. #FTCgreen 

We have time for one more question if you have one about our revised Green Guides! 

#FTCgreen 

And that's a wrap for #FTCgreen Twitter chat. Thanks to everyone who submitted questions! 

#FTCgreen
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000463

22-MAR-2018

08:10 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             683
<SECURITIES>                                     7,656
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,323)
<INVENTORY>                                      6,362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,903
<PP&E>                                           3,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,782)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,402
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        68,943
<OTHER-SE>                                       (444)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,243
<SALES>                                         12,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,002
<CGS>                                            4,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (83)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,354)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,354)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert Louis OAKES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-551.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 17, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 108-109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34213]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[(NM-930-1310-01); (NMNM 89139)]


New Mexico: Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas 
Lease

    Under the provisions of Public Law 97-451, a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 89139 for lands in Eddy County, 
New Mexico, was timely filed and was accompanied by all required 
rentals and royalties accruing from September 1, 1997, the date of 
termination.
    No valid lease has been issued affecting the lands. The lessee has 
agreed to new lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 
per acre or fraction thereof and 16\2/3\ percent, respectively. The 
lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and has reimbursed 
the Bureau of Land Management for the cost of this Federal Register 
notice.
    The Lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the 
lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act 
of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing 
to reinstate the lease effective September 1, 1997, subject to the 
original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and 
royalty rates cited above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gloria S. Baca, BLM, New Mexico State 
Office (505) 438-7566.


[[Page 109]]


    Dated: December 23, 1997.
Gloria S. Baca,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 97-34213 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
#### Joseph O’Brien, Sr., Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Rieran O’Brien, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Michael Reich, et al., Respondents.

[737 NYS2d 297]

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated January 17, 2001, which denied their motion to vacate their default in opposing the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate their default in opposing the defendants’ motion for summary judgment since they did not establish that they had a meritorious cause of action *(see,*CPLR 5015 [a]; *Woodard v LaGuardia Hosp.,*282 AD2d 529; *Parker v City of New York,*272 AD2d 310). In any event, we note that the defendants made a prima facie showing in their motion for summary judgment that the plaintiffs would be unable to prove the essential elements of a legal malpractice cause of action. Upon a review of all of the papers before this Court, it does not appear that the plaintiffs would be able to raise a triable issue of fact in response to the defendants’ motion *(see, Gibson v Worthington Div. of McGraw-Edison Co.,*78 NY2d 1108; *Ashton v Scotman,*260 AD2d 332). Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, H. Miller and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3860]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board


Notice of Meeting

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that the 
Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board will meet on Thursday, 
February 27, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. in room 7C13 of the 
General Accounting Office building, 441 G St., NW., Washington, DC.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss (1) the appropriate 
classification of certain Coast Guard cutters and aircraft, (2) options 
for social insurance programs, (3) the cost-of-capital work plan, and 
(4) an interpretation issue from the Environmental Protection Agency's 
Superfund Accounting Branch related to proper classification of 
recoveries of clean-up costs.
    Any interested person may attend the meeting as an observer. Board 
discussions and reviews are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy Comes, Executive Director, 750 
First St., NE., Room 1001, Washington, DC 20002, or call (202) 512-
7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. Pub. L. No. 92-463, 
Section 10(a)(2), 86 Stat. 770, 774 (1972) (current version at 5 
U.S.C. app. section 10(a)(2) (1988); 41 CFR 101-6.1015 (1990).

    Dated: February 11, 1997.
Wendy M. Comes,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-3860 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M