alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         513,712
<SECURITIES>                                    24,603
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               568,921
<PP&E>                                         110,254
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,472,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,041
<BONDS>                                      1,350,000
<COMMON>                                     6,184,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    491,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,085,645)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,472,195
<SALES>                                        399,848
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               399,848
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,968,746
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,644,663)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,638,806)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,638,806)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           		         	6-MOS		
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>		              	JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>		                   	DEC-31-1996
<CASH>				                            		2,488			
<SECURITIES>					                       9,483
<RECEIVABLES>			                        2,649	
<ALLOWANCES>		                           	200	
<INVENTORY>			                          2,420			
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			                    19,738
<PP&E>						                           17,074
<DEPRECIATION>			                    		10,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>					                    30,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>				               2,912
<BONDS>						                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>  		                   0
<PREFERRED>				                            	0
<COMMON>					                            	557
<OTHER-SE>				                       		28,075					
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	         	30,987
<SALES>						                          11,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>		                   		12,089
<CGS>						                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>				                     	10,693					
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			                      	212
<LOSS-PROVISION>				                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>				                     80
<INCOME-PRETAX>				                     1,104
<INCOME-TAX>				                         	409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			                   	695
<DISCONTINUED>   				                      	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	 			                        0
<CHANGES>						                             0					
<NET-INCOME>				                         	695
<EPS-PRIMARY>				                        	.15
<EPS-DILUTED>					                        .15
        

	


</TABLE>
#### Dale THORPE, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Appellee.

No. 77-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 1978.

Williams, Tomlinson & duFresne, Coral Gables, for appellant.

George F. Knox, Jr., City Atty. and Sherman Bennett Mayor, Asst. City Atty., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Hoffkins v. City of Miami,*339 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7329 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7329

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at S74w16860 Janesville Road, in Muskego, Wisconsin, as the ``Colonel 
                   Hans Christian Heg Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2020

  Mr. Steil introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at S74w16860 Janesville Road, in Muskego, Wisconsin, as the ``Colonel 
                   Hans Christian Heg Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL HANS CHRISTIAN HEG POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located S74w16860 Janesville Road in Muskego, Wisconsin, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Colonel Hans Christian Heg Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
Hans Christian Heg Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Frank CATANIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-37.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 13, 1970.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Wm. Clayton Johnson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In re Teresa P. Pence ADAMS v. STATE of Alabama. Ex parte Teresa P. Pence Adams.

77-711.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Aug. 25, 1978.

Gordon F. Bailey, Jr., Anniston, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari requests this Court to review a “No Opinion” affirmance by the Court of Criminal Appeals, Ala.App., 362 So.2d 654, with the judgment of conviction and sentence ordered by the trial court. Petitioner does not invoke Rule 39(k), ARAP. Thus, the writ is denied.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C. J., and MADDOX, JONES, SHORES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.14.4
	
				
	Michael L. Corbat
	 
	Citigroup Inc.
	 

	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	399 Park Avenue

	 
	 
	New York. NY 10022



 


December 13, 2013


Dr. Robert L. Joss
84 Euclid Avenue
Atherton, CA 94027


Re: Consulting Agreement Renewal


Dear Bob:


This letter sets forth our mutual understanding that the Consulting Agreement dated April 5, 2010, as amended as of October 28, 2010, January 1, 2012, and December 12, 2012 between you and Citigroup Inc. (the “Consulting Agreement”) shall continue in effect on the same terms and conditions from January 1, 2014 through March 31, 2014 (the “2014 Term”) with the following changes to paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Consulting Agreement.  We expect to call on you to perform the Services (as defined in the Consulting Agreement) for a minimum of approximately four days during the 2014 Term, and you will be paid Eighty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred dollars ($87,500) for Services performed during the 2014 Term. 


If this arrangement is acceptable to you, please sign and return one copy of this letter to me.












Citigroup Inc.                        






	
		
	By: /s/ Michael L. Corbat    
	By: /s/ Dr. Robert L/ Joss

	Michael L. Corbat
	Dr. Robert L. Joss    

	Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrants' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
November 26, 1995
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-26-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-28-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-26-1995
<CASH>                                          22,461
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,923
<INVENTORY>                                    393,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               677,521
<PP&E>                                       1,056,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                 459,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,412,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          487,796
<BONDS>                                        232,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,395
<OTHER-SE>                                     559,973
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,412,988
<SALES>                                      1,356,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,356,863
<CGS>                                        1,049,912
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,049,912
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               245,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   645
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,869
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,063
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,930
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
        

</TABLE>
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7328 

To make temporary changes to grants made under the Community Services 

Block Grant Act to facilitate local coronavirus relief. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2020 

Mr. DESAULNIER (for himself and Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To make temporary changes to grants made under the Community Services Block Grant Act to facilitate local 

coronavirus relief. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Services 

5 Block Grant Enhancement Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7328 IH

1 SEC. 2. DISTRIBUTION OF CERTAIN FUNDS APPROPRIATED 

2 FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK 

3 GRANT ACT. 

4 (a) DISTRIBUTION OF CARES ACT FUNDS TO

5 STATES.—Section 675B(b)(3) of the Community Services 

6 Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9906(b)(3)) shall not apply 

7 with respect to funds appropriated by the CARES Act 

8 (Public Law 116–136) to carry out the Community Serv9 ices Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9901 et seq.). 

10 (b) INCREASED POVERTY LINE.—For purposes of 

11 carrying out the Community Services Block Grant Act (42 

12 U.S.C. 9901 et seq.) with any funds appropriated for any 

13 of the fiscal years 2020, 2021, and 2022 for such Act, 

14 the term ‘‘poverty line’’ as defined in section 673(2) of 

15 such Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(2)) means 200 percent of the 

16 poverty line otherwise applicable under such section (ex17 cluding the last sentence of such section) without regard 

18 to this subsection. 

19 (c) DISTRIBUTION OF CARES ACT FUNDS BY

20 STATES TO ELIGIBLE ENTITIES.—Funds appropriated by 

21 the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136) to carry out the 

22 Community Services Block Grant Act (42 U.S.C. 9901 et 

23 seq.) and received by a State shall be made available to 

24 eligible entities (as defined in section 673(1)(A) of such 

25 Act (42 U.S.C. 9902(1)(A)) not later than either 30 days 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7328 IH

1 after such State receives such funds or 30 days after the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act, whichever occurs later. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### KEYSTONE TRUCKING COMPANY, Appellant, v. DIXIE LIME & STONE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 73-1450.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Tom Keating, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,636
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,638
<PP&E>                                       1,174,638
<DEPRECIATION>                               (392,977)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 863,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          115,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                     376,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   863,803
<SALES>                                        324,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,846
<CGS>                                          131,275
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               100,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,174
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,696
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,757
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.83

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, William R. Abbott, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CardiogenesisCorporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Annual Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this AnnualReport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report isbeing prepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation;and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       */s/ William R. Abbott* William R. Abbott    *Chief Financial Officer*       April 30, 2007
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DELETION DOCKET

FOR

KERR-MCGEE SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT SITE

WEST CHICAGO, DUPAGE COUNTY, ILLINOIS

NOVEMBER 2, 2012

NO. DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

1 04/00/89 U.S. EPA/ U.S. EPA Procedures for Completion 48

OSWER and Deletion of National

Priorities List Sites

(OSWER Directive 9320.2-

3A)

2 01/00/00 U.S. EPA/ U.S. EPA Close Out Procedures for 45

OSWER National Priorities List

Sites (OSWER Directive

9320.2-09A-P)

3 11/21/03 U.S. EPA Respondent Administrative Order by 43

Consent for the KerrMcGee Kress Creek/West

Branch of DuPage River

Site and Kerr-McGee

Sewage Treatment Plant

Site 

4 10/07/03 Mitchell, J., Muno, W., Action Memorandum: 17

U.S. EPA U.S. EPA Request for a Time Critical

Removal Action at the KerrMcGee Sewage Treatment 

Plant Site (PORTIONS OF

THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN

REDACTED)

5 10/07/03 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record 3

Index (Original) for the

Kerr-McGee West Chicago

Sewage Treatment Plant

Upland Operable Unit

Removal Site (DOCUMENTS

CONTAINED ON THE INDEX

ARE INCORPORATED BY

REFERENCE INTO THE

DELETION DOCKET)

6 10/16/03 U.S. EPA Respondent Administrative Order on 47 

Consent for Removal Action 

at the Kerr-McGee Sewage 

Treatment Plant Upland Operable Unit
Kerr-McGee STP 

Deletion Docket

Page 2

NO. DATE AUTHOR RECIPIENT TITLE/DESCRIPTION PAGES

7 2004-2005 U.S. EPA Public Administrative Record 14

Index (Original-Update

#3) for the Kerr-McGee

Sewage Treatment Plant

Site (DOCUMENTS CONTAINED

ON THE INDEX ARE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO

THE DELETION DOCKET)

8 06/00/08 ARCADIS Tronox LLC Final Completion Report 218

for Reach 5A at the Kress

Creek/West Branch DuPage

River Site and the River

Portion of the Sewage

Treatment Plant Site

9 08/12/08 Mitchell, J., Krippel, M., Letter re: Completion of 2

U.S. EPA Kerr-McGee Work Under AOC for Removal

Chemical LLC Action at the Kerr-McGee

Sewage Treatment Plant

Site

10 11/00/08 ARCADIS Tronox LLC Final Completion Report 175

for Reach 5B at the Kress

Creek/West Branch DuPage

River Site and the River

Portion of the Sewage

Treatment Plant Site

(Revised)

11 06/12/12 Karl, R., File Final Close Out Report 8

U.S. EPA for the Kerr-McGee Sewage

Treatment Plant Site

12 09/11/12 Kim, J., Karl, R., Letter re: State of 1

Illinois EPA U.S. EPA Illinois Concurrence on

the Delisting of the

Kerr-McGee Chemical

Corporation (Tronox

Corporation) Sewage

Treatment Plan NPL Site
Order filed February 28, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00515

- CV

____________ DELUXE BARBER SCHOOL , LLC AND BONIFICE I . MBAKA , Appellants

V.
MARTIN MBAKA, CHIOMA G. NWAKOR, QUIETSTO RM GROUP, INC.,

D/B/A QUIETSTORM SYS TEMS, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15

- DCV

- 226218



### O R D E R
Appellant s’ brief was due February 25, 2019

. No brief or motion for extension of time has been filed. Unless appellant s file a brief with this court on or before March 27, 2019 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
EX-10.D.3



 Exhibit 10(d)(3) 

AMENDMENT 
 TO THE

 LAMAR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

WHEREAS, Lamar Advertising Company (the “Company”) established the Lamar Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) to
provide deferred compensation for a select group of management or highly compensated employees; 
 WHEREAS, the Company
reserved the right to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 9 of the Plan;  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows: 
 1. Section 5.8(b) is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

(b) Payments that Would Jeopardize the Ability of the Company to Continue as a Going Concern. Payment will be delayed
where the Committee reasonably anticipates that the making of the payment at the date specified under the Plan would jeopardize the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern provided that the delayed payment is made during the first
taxable year of the service provider in which making of the payment would no longer have such effect. 
 2. Except as amended herein, the Plan shall remain
in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be
executed as of 13th day of December 2013. 
  

			
	LAMAR ADVERTISING COMPANY
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Keith A. Istre

		 	Keith A. Istre
		 	Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from financial
statements included in A. T. Cross Company form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          53,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,545
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,626
<INVENTORY>                                     21,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,460
<PP&E>                                         110,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,115
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,719
<SALES>                                         31,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,104
<CGS>                                           17,130
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,883
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    18
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,951)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (624)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,327)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>