alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3563]



[[Page 6835]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network


Privacy Act of 1974, as Amended, System of Records; Correction

AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In notice document 97-605 beginning on page 1489 in the issue 
of Friday, January 10, 1997, make the following correction: On page 
1490 in the second column, a portion of the sentence describing the 
third routine use was dropped. The sentence currently reads: ``The 
third proposed new in computer matching with requesting Federal and 
State agencies under agreements approved in accordance with the Privacy 
Act.'' This should be changed to read: `` The third proposed new 
routine use, which would be added as routine use number (5), will 
permit FinCEN to participate in computer matching with requesting 
Federal and State agencies under agreements approved in accordance with 
the Privacy Act.''

    Date: February 3, 1997.

Alex Rodriguez,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Administration).

[FR Doc. 97-3563 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 4810-25-F
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Barry A. Fromberg, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of Dean Holding Company as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report; 4. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Dean Holding Company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to Dean Holding Company and its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Dean Holding Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures as of the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in Dean Holding Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Dean Holding Company’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dean HoldingCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.5. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dean Holding Company’sauditors and the audit committee of Dean Holding Company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Dean HoldingCompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in Dean Holding Company’s internal control over financial reporting.           /s/ BARRY A. FROMBERG             Barry A. Fromberg      *Chief Financial Officer*  November 14, 2005      
22
<PAGE>


               EXHIBIT 15 - INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT



Board of Directors and Shareholders
Cubic Corporation


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Cubic
Corporation as of March 31, 2000, and the related condensed consolidated
statement of income for the three- and six-month periods ended March 31, 2000
and 1999 and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the
six-month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999. These financial statements are
the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September
30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein) and in our report dated November 29, 1999, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet
at September 30, 1999 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.




                                                     ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
May 10, 2000



                                       11
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CRYO-CELL International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for
the year ended November 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mercedes Walton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Jill M. Taymans, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mercedes WaltonMercedes WaltonChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2006/s/ Jill M. TaymansJill M. TaymansVice President, Finance (Chief Financial Officer)March 30, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 722 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 722

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate a mountain in the State of Utah as ``Miracle Mountain''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Miracle Mountain Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds as follows:
            (1) On September 13, 2018, the Bald Mountain Fire burned 
        nearly 20,000 acres of land in Utah.
            (2) Elk Ridge City, located in Utah County, was nearly the 
        victim of this fire.
            (3) Suddenly, the fire halted its progression and, instead 
        of burning into Elk Ridge City, stayed behind the mountain and 
        spared the city.
            (4) Congress, in acknowledgment of this event, believes 
        this mountain holds special significance to the residents of 
        Elk Ridge City and surrounding communities.
            (5) The presently unnamed peak has been referred to as 
        ``Miracle Mountain'' by many residents since the fire that 
        nearly went into Elk Ridge City.

SEC. 3. MIRACLE MOUNTAIN.

    (a) Designation.--The mountain in the State of Utah, located at 39 
59' 02N, 111 40' 12W, shall be known and designated as ``Miracle 
Mountain''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the mountain described 
in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to ``Miracle 
Mountain''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 722

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate a mountain in the State of Utah as ``Miracle Mountain''.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joe Carroll LOLLEY.

No. 53759.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 19, 1973.

In re: Joe Carroll Lolley applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order.

Writ refused. The application complains of the overruling of motions to quash the bill of information for drunk driving and to suppress evidence of a previous conviction. The application is premature, for defendant has an adequate remedy for review in the event of conviction.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection withthe periodic report of Restoration Hardware, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended January 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Patricia A. McKay, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely forpurposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)         the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.

ThisCertification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with theSecurities and Exchange Commission.
| Date: April 14, 2005 |     |                       |
|---------------------------|----------|----------------------------|
|                           | By:      | /s/ PATRICIA A. MCKAY |
|                      |     | Patricia A. McKay          |
| * *                  | * * | *Chief Financial Officer*  |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1
I, Roger W. Sherman, President, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Preferred Financial Resources,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Preferred
Financial Resources, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4. The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Regulation 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for Preferred
Financial Resources, Inc and have:

iv. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to Preferred Financial Resources, Inc., including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
prepared;

v. Evaluated the effectiveness of Preferred Financial Resources, Inc.'s
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of the report ("Evaluation Date"); and

vi. Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. The other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the Preferred Financial Resources, Inc. auditors and the audit
committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent
function):

i. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect Preferred Financial Resources, Inc.'s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for
Preferred Financial Resources, Inc.'s auditors any material weaknesses in
internal controls; and

ii. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls; and

6. I and the other certifying officer have indicated in the report whether or
not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our
most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

March 16, 2004

Roger W. Sherman
----------------------------
Roger W. Sherman, President
Chief Financial Officer
No. 10013.

#### McCue *v.*Ammon et al.

Decided March 17, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Darke county.

*Messrs. Anderson, Bowman & Anderson**397and *Messrs. Robeson & Yount,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. Martin B. Trainor,*for defendants in error.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.

Shauck, C. J., Crew,' Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### BOCA RATON LAUNDRY AND CLEANERS, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. MERCURY LINEN SERVICE, INC., Appellee.

No. 71-852.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 11, 1972.

Interlocutory appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Stewart LaMotte, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3638]



[[Page 6801]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Bell Communications Research, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 14, 1996, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Bell Communications 
Research, Inc. (``Bellcore'') has filed written notifications on behalf 
of Bellcore; Lucent Technologies, Inc. (``Lucent''); AT&T Corporation 
(``AT&T''); Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. (``Bell Atlantic''); 
Southwestern Bell Technology Resources, Inc. (``TRI''); BellSouth 
Telecommunications, Inc. (``BellSouth''); and Pacific Telesis Group 
(``Pacific'') simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing certain changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Lucent, Murray 
Hill, NJ; and TRI, Austin, TX have become members of the consortium.
    No other changes have been made in the membership, nature and 
objectives of the consortium and Bellcore will file additional written 
notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 29, 1994, Bellcore filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on April 13, 1995 (60. Fed. Reg. 18856).
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-3638 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### The STATE of Florida ex rel. James E. BROCATO, Petitioner, v. E. Wilson PURDY, as Sheriff of Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

Habeas Corpus No. 71-862.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 10, 1971.

*310Max A. Goldfarb, Philip Carlton, Jr., and Rex Ryland, Jr., Miami, for petitioner.

Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Richard Registro, Miami, for respondent.

Before PEARSON, CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We have been presented with a petition for the writ of habeas corpus which we set for hearing upon a rule to show cause why the writ should not be issued. The response made at hearing admitted the factual allegations of the , petition, and clearly demonstrated petitioner’s right to the writ and to discharge. We thereupon entered an order discharging the petitioner with the provision that an opinion of the court would follow.

Petitioner was subpoenaed for jury duty and appeared before the circuit court. His request for a postponement of the time of service was granted but petitioner failed to appear upon notification of the new date of service. A bench warrant was issued and petitioner was brought before the court. Without further proceedings, petitioner was found in contempt of the circuit court and sentenced to ten days in jail, “for failure to appear for service as a juror as required by law.” 1

Fla.Stat. § 40.27, F.S.A., provides a fine as the penalty for the failure of a person duly summoned to attend as a juror in any court. This is the exact breach of the law of which the petitioner was found guilty. The order of the circuit judge does not find any other basis for the charged “contempt.” Under these circumstances, no further proceedings before this court are necessary and this court has no alternative to the discharge of the petitioner.

The order and judgment committing the petitioner is hereby vacated and quashed. The order of this court directing the release of the petitioner, James E. Brocato, is made final and conclusive.

It is so ordered.

1

. See In re S. L. T., Fla.App.1965, 180 So. 2d 374, and authorities therein for the requirement that in any indirect contempt proceeding the accused is always entitled to a hearing and an opportunity to resist the charge through defense or explanation. The requirement for a hearing and an opportunity to resist the charge includes the right to reasonable notice and a reasonable opportunity to present a defense. Also see Martin v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So.2d 8.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Joseph Sinicropi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date: May 12, 2006





                                                 /S/ JOSEPH SINICROPI
                                                 --------------------
                                                     Joseph Sinicropi
                                                     Chief Financial Officer