alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit** **32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Lawrence E. Hyatt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ LAWRENCE E. HYATT       |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Lawrence E. Hyatt           |
| *Chief Financial Officer*** |
|                        |
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
financial  statements  for the three month  period  ended August 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Aug-31-1999
<CASH>                                         140,492
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  482,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    525,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,157,471
<PP&E>                                         355,932
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (317,692)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,237,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          584,139
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       148,265
<OTHER-SE>                                     489,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,237,652
<SALES>                                        396,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               396,605
<CGS>                                          202,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                37,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            37,623
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   38,762
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .00




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66663-66664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33135]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[CO-930-4214-010; COC-61331]


Proposed Withdrawal: Opportunity for Public Meeting; Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, proposes 
to withdraw approximately 450 acres of National Forest System lands for 
10 years to allow management alternatives for the Forest Service. This 
notice closes these lands to location and entry under the mining laws 
for up to two years. The lands remain open to mineral leasing.

DATES: Comments on this proposed withdrawal or requests for public 
meeting must be received on or before March 19, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for a meeting should be sent to the 
Colorado State Director, BLM, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, 
Colorado 80215-7076.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris E. Chelius, 303-239-3706.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 24, 1997, the Department of 
Agriculture, Forest Service, filed an application to withdraw the 
following described National Forest System lands from location and 
entry under the United States mining laws (30 U.S.C. Ch 2):

Uncompahgre National Forest New Mexico Principal Meridian

T. 44 N, R. 7 W.,
    Sec. 31, W\1/2\.
T. 44 N, R. 8 W.,
    Sec. 35, E\1/2\.

    The areas described exclude any patented lands within the 
application and contain approximately 450 acres of National Forest 
System lands in Ouray County.

[[Page 66664]]

    The purpose of this withdrawal is to protect the area and allow the 
Forest Service alternatives in managing the land.
    For a period of 90 days from the date of publication of this 
notice, all parties who wish to submit comments, suggestions, or 
objections in connection with this proposed withdrawal, may present 
their views in writing to the Colorado State Director. If it is 
determined that a public meeting should be held, the public meeting 
will be scheduled and conducted in accordance with 43 CFR 2310.3-
1(c)(2). Notice of the meeting will be published in the Federal 
Register.
    This application will be processed in accordance with the 
regulations set forth in 43 CFR Part 2310.
    For a period of two years from the date of publication in the 
Federal Register, this land will be segregated from the mining laws as 
specified above unless the application is denied or cancelled or the 
withdrawal is approved prior to that date. During this period the 
Forest Service will continue to manage these lands.
Jenny L. Saunders,
Realty Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-33135 Filed 12-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DORIAN DEON WHITE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-3159

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

MORRIS, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7140 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7140

  To prohibit the use of funds for an explosive nuclear weapons test.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2020

   Ms. Titus (for herself, Mr. Horsford, Mr. Beyer, Ms. Gabbard, Mr. 
 Gallego, Mr. Heck, Mr. Huffman, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. McGovern, Ms. Lee of 
  California, and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the use of funds for an explosive nuclear weapons test.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Leadership Against 
Nuclear Explosives Testing Act'' or the ``PLANET Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR NUCLEAR WEAPONS TEST 
              EXPLOSIONS.

    (a) In General.--None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
otherwise made available for fiscal year 2021, or authorized to be 
appropriated or otherwise made available for any fiscal year before 
fiscal year 2021 and available for obligation as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act, may be obligated or expended to conduct or make 
preparations for any explosive nuclear weapons test that produces any 
yield.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Subsection (a) does not limit nuclear 
stockpile stewardship activities that are consistent with the zero-
yield standard and other requirements under law.
                                 <all>
```
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

CASE NAME 

lin the Matter of Graco Inc., et al 

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone number of each 

counselor representative entering an appearance in the above proceding, 

Daniel E. Chapman 

The Troy Law Firm 

755 W Big Beaver Road, Ste 1800 

Troy, Michigan 48084 

(248) 244-9100 

dchapman@troylawfrm.com 

Kimberly A. Cochrane 

The Troy Law Firm . 

755 W Big Beaver Road, Ste 1800
 

Troy, Michigan 48084
 

(248) 244-9100 

kcochrane@troylawfrm.com 

r'¡l 

.; ,J "
 

FilE/DOCKET NUMBER 

\: .
 

119350 

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, partnerships, 

corporations, or associations on whose behalf this Notice of Appearance 

is being filed. 

Complete Automation, Inc. 

1776D W Clarkston Road 

Lake Onon, Michigan 48362 

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 

5. DATE SIGNED
 

¡January 30, 2012 

Federal Trade Commission 

Room H-113 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20580 

FTC Form 232 (rev. 7/11) 

17
This opinion will be unpublished and

may not be cited except as provided by

Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN COURT OF APPEALS

A14-2103

In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. N. K., Child.

Filed July 13, 2015

Affirmed

Kirk, Judge

Todd County District Court

File No. 77-JV-14-865

Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Susan J. Andrews, Assistant 

Public Defender, St. Paul, Minnesota (for appellant J.N.K.)

Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, Minnesota; and 

Chad M. Larson, Douglas County Attorney, Michelle L. Clark, Assistant County Attorney, 

Alexandria, Minnesota (for respondent State of Minnesota)

Considered and decided by Connolly, Presiding Judge; Kirk, Judge; and Smith, 

Judge. 

U N P U B L I S H E D O P I N I O N

KIRK, Judge

Juvenile appeals his delinquency adjudication for second-degree criminal sexual 

conduct, arguing that the district court erred in finding that he acted with sexual intent. We 

affirm.
2

D E C I S I O N

In a delinquency adjudication, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt 

“every fact necessary to constitute the charged crime.” In re Welfare of S.M.J., 556 

N.W.2d 4, 6 (Minn. App. 1996). We are limited to ascertaining whether, given the facts 

and legitimate inferences, a fact-finder could reasonably determine that each of the 

elements of the delinquency petition has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In re 

Welfare of T.N.Y., 632 N.W.2d 765, 768 (Minn. App. 2001). We view the record in the 

light most favorable to the adjudication and assume that the fact-finder believed the 

testimony supporting the adjudication and disbelieved all contrary evidence. S.M.J., 556 

N.W.2d at 6.

Viewing the record in the light most favorable to adjudication, we conclude that 

J.N.K.’s argument that he acted without sexual intent when he sat on the couch next to his 

eight-year-old cousin, lifted up her arms, unbuttoned her pants, reached into her pants, and 

“inappropriately” touched her vaginal area is without merit. The circumstances proved are 

consistent with guilt and inconsistent with any rational hypothesis except guilt. See State 

v. Palmer, 803 N.W.2d 727, 733 (Minn. 2011) (providing the test for circumstantial 

evidence, like intent). The nature of the touching precludes any “possibility of an innocent 

explanation such as accidental touching,” and no innocent explanation was asserted by 

J.N.K. See State v. Vick, 632 N.W.2d 676, 691 (Minn. 2001). When asked if he had 

touched other girls the same way, he replied “[m]y girlfriend,” which further indicates that 

he knew he was engaging in an act consistent with a sexual relationship.

Affirmed.
N\

RECEIVED
ABD FILED

'
JEROME M. STEINER, JR. toe | (007 BH %
| Federal Trade Commission
24] 901 Market St, Suite 570
San Francisco, CA 94103
(415) 356-5270 wea
| BLAINE T. WELSH a .

Assistant United States Attommey .
701 E. Bridger Avenue, Suite 800

Las Vegas, NV 89101

(702) 388-6336

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ANG = cULd08
LAN RR

9] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

a| DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1

)
ul | FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, CV-S-97-00750-PMP (LRL)
12| Plaintiff, NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY
-DISMISSAL OF AMERICAN

3 v. FAMILY CONSULTANTS,

: INC. AND REUNION

~~"44 | DAYTON FAMILY PRODUCTIONS, INC., stal,, ) MANAGEMENT PARTNERS,

b | Defendants. INC. AS DEFENDANTS
16 |
17 | Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission gives
18 || notice that it voluntarily dismisses American Family Consultants, Inc. and Reunion Management
19 || Partners, Inc. as defendants in this matter. Because neither defendant has served an answer or a
20 | motion for summary judgment, this action may be dismissed without court order.
21] Respectfully submitted March 31, 1999.
aol
23| Felon Tede Comission
24 | BLAINE T. WELSH
95 | Assistant United States Attorney
i Attomeys for Plaintiff
#### Joshua GREEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 73-750, 73-751.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 4, 1973.

Joshua Green, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of this appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.33-58637, 333-88151, 333-88773, 333-61294, 333-118493 and 333-73348 of BJ Services Company on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-134724 on Form S-3 of our reports dated November 29, 2007, relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedule of BJ Services Company, and the effectiveness of BJ Services Company’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BJ Services Company for the year endedSeptember 30, 2007. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Houston, Texas 

November 29, 2007
#### Richard WALKER, Appellant, v. SEABOARD COASTLINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. S-247.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 25, 1973.

Robert G. Alexander, Jacksonville, for appellant.

George D. Gabel, Jr., Toole, Taylor, Moseley, Gabel & Milton, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., DREW, Associate Judge, and WIGGINTON, J., concur.
**FORM OF**

**SECOND AMENDMENT TO**

**O’CHARLEY’S INC.**

**EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**(the “Amendment”)**

 

**O’CHARLEY’S INC.**

**(the “Company”)**

**And**

 

**[EXECUTIVE NAME]**

**(“Executive”)**

 

**March 11, 2009**

 

**BACKGROUND**

 

A.    Executive is currently employed as the Company’s **[****INSERT JOB TITLE****]** and is party to that certain O’Charley’s Inc. Executive Employment Agreement dated as of November 6, 2007 by and between the Company and Executive (the “Agreement”).

B.        The Company and Executive previously entered into that certain First Amendment to the Agreement dated January 12, 2009, pursuant to which, among other things, the initial term of the Agreement was extended through August 29, 2011.

C.        The Company and Executive desire to further amend the Agreement to further extend the term until March 2, 2012, consistent with the Company’s desire to retain the services of Executive and other senior executives of the company.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby amend the Agreement by entering into this Second Amendment to the Agreement (this “Second Amendment”) as follows:

Section 1.   Amendment.  Section 1.3 of Article I of the Agreement, as amended, is hereby amended to provide that the defined term “Initial Term” shall mean March 2, 2012.

Section 2. Effect of Amendment. Except as and to the extent expressly modified by this Second Amendment, the Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect in all respects.

Section 3. Counterparts. This Second Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement.

Section 4. Governing Law. This Second Amendment shall be governed by and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Tennessee, without regard to its conflict of laws rules.

[Signature page(s) follow(s)]

 

----
#### Arthur Peter FERRIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-1075.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 30, 1970.

Arthur Peter Ferrin, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

*263PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having filed his response thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Availability of a Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact 
Statement on Impacts of Artificial Salmon and Steelhead Production 
Strategies in the Columbia Basin

AGENCIES: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, (lead agency), National 
Marine Fisheries Service, Bonneville Power Administration (cooperating 
agencies).

Action: Notice of Reopening of Comment Period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As specified in the official Notice of Availability (FR, Vol. 
61, No. 250, p. 68284), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) 
requested comments on the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact 
Statement be received by February 10, 1997. This notice announces the 
Service has reopened the comment period.

DATES: Written comments are requested by May 1, 1997.

ADDRESS WRITTEN COMMENTS: Send comments to PEIS Team Leader, U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, 911 NE 11 Ave, Portland, Oregon, 97232-4181.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Hillwig, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 
Service, Telephone: 503-872-2766 or Dave Riley, Telephone: 503-226-
2460.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Michael J. Spear,
Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 97-4140 Filed 2-20- 97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4650]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice 97-018]


Notice of Prospective Patent License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of prospective patent license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASA hereby gives notice that Systems Research Group, Inc. of 
Colorado Springs, CO 80915, has applied for an exclusive license to 
practice the inventions described in NASA Case No. MSC-21941-1, 
entitled ``Control System for Prosthetic Devices,'' NASA Case No. MSC-
21941-2, entitled ``Control System for Prosthetic Devices,'' and NASA 
Case No. MSC-21941-3, entitled ``Control Method for Prosthetic 
Devices.'' Written objections to the prospective grant of a license 
should be sent to Johnson Space Center.

DATES: Responses to this notice must be received by April 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Hardie R. Barr, Patent Attorney, Mail Stop HA, Houston, TX 77058, 
telephone (281) 483-1003.

    Dated: February 14, 1997.
Edward A. Frankle,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-4650 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-01-M
#### Jules SWINTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-640.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 20, 1973.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Lewis S. Kimler, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel Rosenblatt and Stephan V. Rosin, Asst. Atty. Gens., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of State of Medlin, Fla.1973, 273 So.2d 394.