Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 31 / Friday, February 14, 1997 / Notices 7041

that believes itself to be culturally

affiliated with these human remains and

associated funerary objects should

contact Gary Selinger, Special Projects

Manager, University of Alaska Museum,

907 Yukon Drive, Fairbanks, AK 99775–

1200; telephone: (907) 474–6117, before

March 17, 1997. Repatriation of the

human remains and associated funerary

objects to the Kenaitze Indian Tribe may

begin after that date if no additional

claimants come forward.

Dated: January 28, 1997.

Michele C. Aubry,

Acting Departmental Consulting

Archeologist,

Archeology and Ethngraphy Program.

[FR Doc. 97–3682 Filed 2–13–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

Notice of Intent to Repatriate a Cultural

Item from Arizona in the Possession of

the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New

York, NY

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

Notice is hereby given under the

Native American Graves Protection and

Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. 3005 (a)(2),

of the intent to repatriate a cultural item

in the possession of the Metropolitan

Museum of Art, New York, NY, which

meets the definition of ‘‘object of

cultural patrimony’’ under Section 2 of

the Act.

The cultural item is an Apache Gaan

mask of painted wood and cloth.

This mask was collected by E. H.

Davis between 1910–1911, and

transferred to the Metropolitan Museum

of Art from the Museum of Primitive Art

in 1978.

The cultural affiliation of this item is

San Carlos Apache as verified by the

San Carlos Apache Tribe. The Tribe has

indicated that this item has ongoing

traditional and cultural importance to

the tribe and could not have been

conveyed by any individual tribal

member.

Based on the above mentioned

information, officials of the

Metropolitan Museum of Art have

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.

3001 (3)(D), this cultural item has

ongoing historical, traditional, and

cultural importance central to the

culture itself, and could not have been

alienated, appropriated, or conveyed by

any individual. Officials of the

Metropolitan Museum of Art have also

determined that, pursuant to 25 U.S.C.

3001(2), there is a relationship of shared

group identity which can be reasonably

traced between this item and the San

Carlos Apache Tribe.

This notice has been sent to officials

of the Camp Verde Yavapai-Apache

Community, the Fort McDowell

Mohave-Apache Community, the

Payson Tonto Apache Tribe, the San

Carlos Apache Tribe, and the White

Mountain Apache Tribe.

Representatives of any other Indian tribe

that believes itself to be culturally

affiliated with these objects should

contact Julie Jones, Curator in Charge,

Department of the Arts of Africa,

Oceania, and the Americas,

Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,

NY 10028–1098, telephone (212) 570–

3705 before March 17, 1997.

Repatriation of these objects to the San

Carlos Apache Tribe may begin after

that date if no additional claimants

come forward.

Dated: February 7, 1997.

Francis P. McManamon,

Departmental Consulting Archeologist,

Manager, Archeology and Ethnography

Program.

[FR Doc. 97–3683 Filed 2–13–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–70–F

Bureau of Reclamation

Columbia River System Operation

Review, Selection of a System

Operation Strategy, Record of Decision

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation,

Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability of record

of decision.

SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is

to announce the availability of the

Record of Decision (signed February 7,

1997) which documents the decision of

the Bureau of Reclamation

(Reclamation) to implement existing

and modified plans related to reservoir

regulation and project operation for

Hungry Horse (Montana) and Grand

Coulee (Washington) projects.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Record of

Decision may be requested from:

Regional Director, Bureau of

Reclamation, Attention: Catherine

Konrath, Pacific Northwest Region, 1150

North Curtis Road, Boise, ID 83706–

1234; telephone (208) 378–5008.

Copies of the Record of Decision are

available for inspection and review at

the following Reclamation offices:

—Commissioners Office, 1849 C Street

NW, Room 7627, Washington, DC

—Lower Columbia Area Office, 825 NE

Multnomah, Suite 1110, Portland,

Oregon

—Upper Columbia Area Office, 1917

Marsh Road, Yakima, Washington

—Grand Coulee Power Office, Grand

Coulee, Washington

—Hungry Horse Field Office, Hungry

Horse, Montana

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Reclamation, Pacific

Northwest Region, Attention: Catherine

Konrath, 1150 North Curtis Road, Boise,

Idaho 83706–1234; telephone (208) 378–

5008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Reclamation, the U.S. Army Corps of

Engineers, and the Bonneville Power

Administration are responsible for

management of the Federal Columbia

River Power System. In 1990, the three

Federal agencies began the System

Operation Review for the purpose of

developing and implementing a

coordinated system operating strategy

for managing the multiple uses of the

system while meeting the biological

needs of the species protected under the

Endangered Species Act. Pursuant to the

National Environmental Policy Act of

1969, the selection of the system

operation strategy preferred alternative

is documented in the Final

Environmental Impact Statement,

November 1995.

Dated: February 7, 1997.

John W. Keys, III,

Regional Director, Pacific Northwest Region.

[FR Doc. 97–3811 Filed 2–13–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–94–M

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Proposed Final Judgment and

Competitive Impact Statement; United

States v. Signature Flight Support

Corporation

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act,

15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h), that a proposed

Final Judgment, Stipulation, and

Competitive Impact Statement have

been filed with the United States

District Court for the District of

Columbia in United States v. Signature

Flight Support Corporation, Civil No.

97–0248. The proposed Final Judgment

is subject to approval by the Court after

the expiration of the statutory 60-day

public comment period and compliance

with the Antitrust Procedures and

Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h).

On February 3, 1997, the United

States filed a Complaint seeking to

enjoin a transaction in which Signature

Flight Support Corporation

(‘‘Signature’’) agreed to acquire

International Aviation Palm Beach, Inc.

(‘‘International Aviation’’). Signature

and International Aviation are two of

three fixed base operators (‘‘FBOs’’)