alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32(c)**

 

**The Dayton Powerand Light Company**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned officer of The Dayton Power and Light Company (the “Issuer”) herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009, which this certificate accompanies,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Issuers as of the dates and for the periods expressedtherein.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Issuer and will beretained by the Issuers and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
| /s/ Paul M. Barbas                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul M. Barbas                         |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date:April 29, 2009

 

Theforegoing certificate is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of the Issuer’s Annual Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

1

----
#### Ronald Wayne BRADBURY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-326.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 15, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgments of the lower court are affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals
For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23

- 12015

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________

LINDA CHASE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus MARTIN WALSH, et al.,

Defendants,

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Defendant

- Appellee. USCA11 Case: 23-12015 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 12015

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 5:22

- cv

- 00105

- AW

- HTC

____________________

Before J ORDAN , N EWSOM , and B RANCH , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction because Linda Chase’s notice of appeal, filed on June 12, 2023, was untimely to appeal from the district court’s March 20, 2023 order and judgment dismissing her second amended complaint. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin. , 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and al l other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-12015 Document: 16-1 Date Filed: 08/02/2023 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66619-66620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-102-000]


Current Energy, Inc.; Notice of Issuance of Order

December 15, 1997.
    Current Energy, Inc. (Current Energy) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Current Energy will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Current Energy also 
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, 
Current Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket approval 
under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and 
assumptions of liability by Current Energy.
    On December 4, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Rate Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, 
granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the 
following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Current Energy should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 
211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Current Energy is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the

[[Page 66620]]

applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably 
necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Current Energy's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is January 5, 1998. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 
20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33157 Filed 12-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,371
<SECURITIES>                                     1,065
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                       338
<INVENTORY>                                      1,476
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,923
<PP&E>                                          43,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,981
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,659
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,006
<SALES>                                        110,201
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,402
<CGS>                                           73,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,466)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (964)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,502)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                                                  EXHIBIT 12.2


                               Dean Foods Company
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
                                  (In Millions)



                                                            Three Months Ended
                                                               August 26, 2001
                                                            ------------------
Income before taxes                                             $         20.8
                                                                --------------

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense                                                     16.6
     Portion of rentals (33%)                                              4.6
                                                                --------------

     Total fixed charges                                                  21.2
                                                                --------------

Earnings before taxes and  fixed charges                        $         42.0
                                                                ==============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
stock dividends                                                            2.0
                                                                ==============
mroruric mn

-900AM

OCT 2 8 2002

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

STRICT C,
FILED

\'
A). ol ups

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
600 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.,
Washington, DC 20580,

Petitioner,

MOREHEAD McKIM GALLAHER
FUNERAL DIRECTORS, INC., and
MICHAEL J. BANNON,

424 West 51° Street,

New York, NY 10019,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
v. ) No. M18-304
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Respondents. )
)

ORDER OF CIVIL CONTEMPT

Petitioner, the Federal Trade Commission, has moved this Court for an Order holding
respondents Morehead McKim Gallaher Funeral Directors, Inc. (“Morehead McKim”), and
Morehead McKim’s director/manager, Michael J. Bannon, in civil contempt for failing to comply
with this Court’s Order of June 28, 2002. The Order of June 28 required Morehead McKim to
comply in full with a Civil Investigative Demand (“CID”) that was issued to Morehead McKim
by the Federal Trade Commission. After considering the papers of record and all arguments
presented by the parties, this Court finds 1) that the Order of June 28 directed to Morehead
McKim is clear and unambiguous; 2) that there is clear and convincing evidence that Morehead
McKim failed to comply with the June 28 Order; 3) there is clear and convincing evidence that
Morehead McKim has made no attempt to comply, and has made no showing that it is unable to

comply, with the June 28 Order; 4) that clear and convincing evidence shows that Michael J.


i
. Bannon is responsible for the affairs of Morehead McKim and has the power to direct
compliance with the June 28 Order; and 5) there is clear and convincing evidence that Michael J.
Bannon has made no attempt to comply with the June 28 Order.

WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED that respondents Morehead McKim and Michael J.
Bannon are hereby held in civil contempt as a result of their failure to comply with this Court's
Order of June 28, 2002. In order for respondents to purge themselves of this contempt, it is
ordered that:

1. Within 5 days after entry of this Order, respondents Morehead McKim and
Michael J. Bannon shall (as directed by this Court’s Order of June 28, 2002) comply in full with
the CID issued by the Commission to Morehead McKim on April 12, 2002;

2. In the event that respondents fail to comply with the provision above, they shall,
beginning on the sixth day after entry of this Order and continuing until they have complied in

full with the CID, be jointly and severally liable for a monetary sanction of $500 per day;

3. In the event that, on the 1 Ith day after entry of this Order, respondents have failed

to comply in full with this Court’s Order of June 28, 2002, this Court shall
In SA,

Michael J. Bannon be-arrested-by-the-United-States-Marshall and ube ommimen

until such time as respondents have complied in full with the Commission’s CID.

SO ORDERED

Date. /O [esfor =

Ce United Sates Dp trict Judge

CERI it AS A TRUE COPY ON Impos e

ais paTeC/Ce LK BOC
BY. CME led ve ye 4

' SetpctionS,
i ‘ including |
if Offre Pr ratic ?

wer st

( ) Clerk
( )Deptty
[SSurme On F
Larne few
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-138-000]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

December 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 17, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT), 1600 Smith Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket 
No. CP98-138-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.216 of 
the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 
and 157.216) for authorization to abandon certain facilities in 
Arkansas under NGT's blanket certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-384-
000 and CP82-384-001 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, all 
as more fully set forth in the request that is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    NGT specifically proposes to abandon and remove a 1-inch inactive 
tap on Line Am-46, at station 194+57 in Hempsted County, Arkansas. NGT 
constructed this tap in 1941 to deliver natural gas to a rural domestic 
customer of Arkla, a distribution division of NorAm Energy Corp. 
(Arkla). Arkla has removed its distribution meter and the landowner has 
requested that NGT remove the tap to allow construction on the 
property. The abandonment cost of the facilities is $258, and the 
landowner has agreed to reimburse NGT for these costs.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34113 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ADAM SOUSA, DOC #Y12766, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D18-3099 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 5, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge. Adam Sousa, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7211 

To increase the eligibility of nonprofit organizations for loans under the 

Paycheck Protection Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2020 

Mr. HICE of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. 

COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. CURTIS, Mr. FLORES, Mr. 

GOSAR, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. MOONEY

of West Virginia, Mr. WEBER of Texas, Mr. YOHO, Mr. ALLEN, and Mr. 

FERGUSON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To increase the eligibility of nonprofit organizations for loans 

under the Paycheck Protection Program, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Limiting Infant Fatal5 ity and Empowering Nonprofit Organization Workforces’’ 

6 or the ‘‘LIFE NOW Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7211 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE PAYCHECK PROTECTION 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 (a) ELIGIBILITY OF ALL NONPROFIT ORGANIZA4 TIONS FOR LOANS.—Section 7(a)(36)(D) of the Small 

5 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(D)) is amended— 

6 (1) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘nonprofit organi7 zation,’’ each place that term appears; 

8 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘nonprofit organi9 zation,’’; and 

10 (3) by striking clause (vi) and inserting the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(vi) ELIGIBILITY FOR NONPROFIT

13 ORGANIZATIONS.—During the covered pe14 riod, any nonprofit organization shall be el15 igible to receive a covered loan.’’. 

16 (b) PROHIBITION ON FUNDING FOR ABORTIONS.— 

17 Section 7(a)(36) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

18 636(a)(36)) is amended by adding at the end the fol19 lowing: 

20 ‘‘(S) PROHIBITION ON FUNDING FOR

21 ABORTIONS.— 

22 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Except as pro23 vided in clause (ii), no entity, including an 

24 affiliate, subsidiary, successor, or clinic 

25 thereof, that provides abortions shall be el26 igible to receive a covered loan. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7211 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) EXCEPTIONS.—Clause (i) shall 

2 not apply to— 

3 ‘‘(I) a hospital, as defined in sec4 tion 1861(e) of the Social Security 

5 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(e)); or 

6 ‘‘(II) an abortion described in 

7 section 507(a) of division A of the 

8 Further Consolidated Appropriations 

9 Act, 2020 (Public Law 116–94).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, each of the undersigned officers of Rio Tinto plc, registered in England and Wales (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2016 (the Report) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of the operations of the Company.



|                             |  |  |  |  |  |                                 
|---------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|/s/ Jean-Sebastien Jacques   |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Chris Lynch                 
|Name: Jean-Sebastien Jacques |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Chris Lynch               
|Title:   Chief executive     |  |  |  |  |  | Title:   Chief financial officer
|                             |  |  | 
|Date: 1 March 2017           |  |  |  |  |  | Date: 1 March 2017              

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act.



---

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act, each of the undersigned officers of Rio Tinto Limited, registered in
Victoria, Australia,(the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2016 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



|                              |  |  |  |  |  |                                 
|----------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------
|/s/ Jean-Sebastien Jacques    |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Chris Lynch                 
|Name:  Jean-Sebastien Jacques |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Chris Lynch               
|Title:   Chief executive      |  |  |  |  |  | Title:   Chief financial officer
|                              |  |  | 
|Date: 1 March 2017            |  |  |  |  |  | Date: 1 March 2017              

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by
reference with any filing under the Securities Act.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-130007, No. 333-10178 and No. 333-31813 on Form S-8 and No. 333-129242, No. 333-125012, No. 333-117768, and No. 333-95235 on Form S-3 of our report dated April 17,2007, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”, in 2006) relating to theconsolidated financial statements of The Wet Seal, Inc. and our report on management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Wet Seal, Inc. for the yearended February 3, 2007. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Costa Mesa, California 

April 17, 2007