alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2274
CHARLES WILLIAM LEVY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CA-97-1151-A) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles William Levy, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Everett Rose, III, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the County of Fairfax on his civil action arising out of his eviction from his apartment. Because there is no evidence in the record to support any claim against Fairfax County, we affirm.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7101 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7101

 To provide for the continuation of paid parental leave for members of 
       the Armed Services in the event of the death of the child.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2020

Mr. Hurd of Texas (for himself and Mrs. Davis of California) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the continuation of paid parental leave for members of 
       the Armed Services in the event of the death of the child.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Elaine M. Checketts Military 
Families Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. CONTINUATION OF PAID PARENTAL LEAVE UPON DEATH OF CHILD.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall amend the regulations prescribed 
pursuant to subsections (i) and (j) of section 701 of title 10, United 
States Code, to provide that the eligibility of primary and secondary 
caregivers for paid parental leave that has already been approved shall 
not terminate upon the death of the child for whom such leave is taken.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT 2014-1 
 TO THE

 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

AMENDMENT, dated as of February 28, 2014, between Internet Capital Group Operations, Inc., (the “Company”) and
Walter W. Buckley, III (“Executive”). 
 RECITALS 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement on February 28, 2007 (such agreement,
as amended to date, the “Employment Agreement”), which sets forth the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; 

WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to increase Executive’s target bonus; and 

WHEREAS, Section 22 of the Employment Agreement provides that the Employment Agreement may be amended pursuant to a written
agreement between the Company and Executive. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby agree that the Employment
Agreement shall be amended as follows: 
 1. The last sentence of Section 2 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended in its
entirety to read as follows: 
 “Executive’s target annual bonus shall be 175% of base salary.” 

2. In all respects not modified by this Amendment 2014-1, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive agree to the terms of the foregoing Amendment 2014-1, effective as of the date set
forth above. 
  

			
	INTERNET CAPITAL GROUP OPERATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Douglas A. Alexander

	Name:	 	Douglas A. Alexander
	Title:	 	President
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	 /s/ Walter W. Buckley, III

	Walter W. Buckley, III
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

March 14, 2011

Bernard A. Nigro, Jr.

Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP

801 17 Street, N.W. th

Washington, DC 20006

Re: Polypore International, Inc.

Docket No. 9327

Dear Mr. Nigro:

This is in response to the Application of Polypore International, Inc. For Approval of the

Proposed Monitor Trustee and Monitor Trustee Agreement (“Application”), which you filed on

February 25, 2011, pursuant to Paragraph III of the Order in Docket No. 9327 (“Order”). In the

Application, Polypore International, Inc. (“Polypore”) seeks Commission approval of James L.

Schaeffer and J.L. Schaeffer & Associates, LLC (“Schaeffer”) as the Monitor Trustee in this

matter and approval of the Monitor Trustee Agreement entered into on February 23, 2011,

between Polypore and Schaeffer. The Commission has determined to approve Schaeffer as the

Monitor Trustee and the Monitor Trustee Agreement. In granting its approval, the Commission

relied on the information you submitted and assumed it to be accurate and complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

cc: Harry R. Blackburn, Esq.

Blackburn & Associates, P.C.

74 S. Main St.

Medford, NJ 08055
<page>                                      EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Diversified
Futures Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee
Horwitz, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.


By: /s/ Lee Horwitz

Name: 	 Lee Horwitz
Title:	 Chief Financial Officer

Date:	 March 23, 2007
United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

No. 95-3341.

Dennis L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION, INC., a non-profit

Florida corporation, Defendant-Appellant,

Pinellas County School Board, in its official capacity,

Defendant.

Jan. 6, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida. (No. 95-1407-CIV-T-24B), Susan C. Bucklew,

Judge.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD,

Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Johnson, a student at Boca Ciega High School in

Pinellas County, Florida became ineligible to participate in

interscholastic football and wrestling because he had attained age

19 by August 31 of the school year. This age limit is in effect in

many jurisdictions and, in Florida, is the subject of a bylaw of

the Florida High School Activities Association, Inc., of which Boca

Ciega High School and most other public and private secondary

schools in Florida are members. Johnson sued FHSAA and the

Pinellas County School Board seeking an injunction against

enforcement of the 19-year rule and forbidding potential penalties

against the school being penalized for allowing him to play.

Johnson's claims were premised upon the Rehabilitation Act, 29

U.S.C. § 794 and the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §

12101 et seq. Because of our disposition of the case we do not
need to address whether under 42 U.S.C. § 12132 FHSAA is a "public

entity." The district court granted the relief sought. The

Association has appealed.

 It is not disputed that meanwhile the football season and

wrestling season have concluded with Johnson having participated in

football, and he intends no further participation in high school

athletics. We agree with the decision of the Seventh Circuit in

Jordan v. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n, Inc., 16 F.3d 785

(7th Cir.1994), that in this circumstance no case or controversy

exists between Johnson and FHSAA. Johnson suggests that the case

remains live because of the possibility that penalties might be

enforced against the high school for having permitted Johnson to

play pursuant to the district court's injunction. But the high

school is not a party to this case. It does not appear that any

penalty might be assessed against the Pinellas County School Board

and, in any event, the Board did not join in the appeal to this

court.

 The "capable of repetition yet avoiding review" exception to

mootness does not apply because it requires a reasonable

expectation that the same complaining party would be subjected to

the same action again, Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 102 S.Ct.

1181, 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982), and there is no such expectation here.

The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is

REMANDED with instructions to dismiss as moot.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7108 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to allow for emergency use of 

certain land during a pandemic, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2020 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself and Ms. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to allow for emergency use of certain land during a pandemic, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EMERGENCY USE OF CRP LAND DURING PAN4 DEMIC. 

5 Section 1233(b)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Food Security Act 

6 of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3833(b)(1)(B)(i)(I)) is amended— 

7 (1) in the matter preceding item (aa), by strik8 ing ‘‘or other emergency,’’ and inserting ‘‘or other 

9 emergency (including a pandemic),’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7108 IH

1 (2) in item (cc), by inserting ‘‘or pandemic’’ 

2 after ‘‘natural disaster event’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,798
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                    (16,843)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,270)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     In connection with the Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company (the “Company”) for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Jack F. Callahan, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.       /s/ JACK F. CALLAHAN, JR.         Jack F. Callahan, Jr.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP95-197-025]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 18, 1997.
    Take notice on February 12, 1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 
Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, certain tariff sheets, which tariff 
sheets are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing.
    On June 19, 1996 Transco filed a Stipulation and Agreement 
(Agreement) in Docket Nos. RP95-197, et al. which, among other things, 
resolves Transco's cost of service, overall throughput level and mix of 
throughput for the Docket No. RP95-197 rate period commencing September 
1, 1995. In addition, the Agreement resolves, pursuant to Article V of 
the Agreement, certain tariff issues, including (1) Implementation of a 
new open-access, interruptible storage service (ISS) and a new 
Interconnect Transfer Service (ICTS), and (2) revised tariff provisions 
regarding Delivery Point Entitlements (DPE) and Intra-Day Scheduling 
(Intra-Day) procedures to be implemented upon the effectiveness of the 
Agreement. Consistent with Article V of the Agreement, the instant 
filing proposes to implement the new services under Rate Schedules ISS 
and ICTS and the revised tariff provisions regarding DPE and Intra-Day. 
Such tariff sheets are proposed to be effective April 1, 1997.
    In addition to the foregoing, included therewith are tariff sheets 
submitted in the instant filing, proposed to be effective April 1 and 
July 1, 1996, which reflect the settlement rates updated to incorporate 
approved tracker filings made subsequent to the date the Agreement was 
filed (i.e. subsequent to June 19, 1996). Finally, the filing includes 
a revision to its Index of Provisions of its General Terms & Conditions 
(Section 29) to reflect a reference to tariff provisions regarding 
``latest estimated allocated data'' which became effective August 1, 
1996.
    Transco states that it is serving copies of the instant filing to 
customers, State Commissions and other interested parties.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4406 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Numbers 333-148163 and 333-132607 on Form S-8 of NaturalNano, Inc of our report dated April 8, 2008 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of NaturalNano, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.  Our report dated April 8, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

 

 

**McGladrey & Pullen, LLP**

New York, New York

 

April 8, 2008
#### Parnell CURTIS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. D. ADKISON; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 01-17156.

D.C. No. CV-01-05716-REC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 16, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument and denies Parnell's request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Parnell Curtis, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court judgment dismissing his action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915A; 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We review de novo, *Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and affirm.

Curtis admits that he failed to exhaust his claims prior to filing his complaint in federal court. The district court, therefore, properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice. *See*42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); *Booth v. Churner,*532 U.S. 731, 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001) (requiring prisoners to exhaust available administrative remedies prior to bringing suit in federal court).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
FILED

April 15, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt

Clerk

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

JOHN R. WHALEY, ) C/A NO. 03A01-9809-JV-00272

)

Petitioner-Appellant, ) BLOUNT JUVENILE

)

v. ) HON. WILLIAM TERRY DENTON,

) JUDGE

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ex rel )

ANNA GIVENS, ) AFFIRMED

) AND

Respondent-Appellee. ) REMANDED

KEVIN W. SHEPHERD, Maryville, for Petitioner-Appellant.

JOHN KNOX WALKUP, Attorney General and Reporter, and 

RONALD W. McNUTT, Assistant Attorney General, Na shville, for RespondentAppellee.

O P I N I O N

Franks, J.

Appellant filed a T.R.C.P. Rule 60 with the Trial Court on March 12,

1996, attacking a judgment entered by the Juvenile Court on August 1, 1980. That

judgment provided:

Johnny Whaley appears in open Court and acknowledges that he is the

father of John Randall Ogle, and the child is declared to be the

legitimate child of Johnny Whaley and Anna Elizabeth Ogle. The name

of the child shall be changed to John Randall Wha ley. The father’s date

of birth was Februa ry 22, 1951 in the state of Tennessee. The birth

certificate shall be amended to reflect the correct information. The

father shall pay into the Registry of this Court the sum of Twenty

Dollars ($20.00) per week for support of sa id child. The first payment is

due on or before August 8, 1980 and a like payment each Friday

thereafter. 

Appellant was denied relief in the Trial Court, on the ground that his
1

Patrick v. Dickson, 526 S.W.2d 449, (TN. 1975).

2

Rule 60 motion was not timely, but he argues on appeal that this Court should declare

the 1980 judgment void on the basis that it was not entered in compliance with the

requirements of Rule 58 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure.

This argument is without merit. The Rules of Juvenile Procedure,

applying the Rules of Civil Proc edure to paternity cases, was not effective until 1984. 

The Tennessee Supreme Court held in 19751 that the Tennessee Rules of Civil

Procedure did not apply to paternity cases in juvenile court because of the juvenile

court’s structure, and the juvenile courts had not been restructured nor the Rules

adopted, as of the time of the entry of the judgment in this case. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Trial Court for the reasons

herein stated, and remand with cost of the appeal assessed to the appe llant.

__________________________

Herschel P. Franks, J.

CONCUR:

___________________________

Houston M. Goddard, P.J.

___________________________

Charles D. Susano, Jr., J.
#### H. C. SCHAAK d/b/a Schaak’s Market, Petitioner, v. Patrick MURPHY, Respondent.

No. 43025.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 267 So.2d 695.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEICLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4567]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[DA 97-351]


Filing Period Announced for Comments on Qualcomm's Pioneer's 
Preference Application (GEN Docket No. 90-314)

February 18, 1997.
    The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently vacated the 
FCC's decision to deny QUALCOMM, Inc.'s application for a broadband 
Personal Communications Services pioneer's preference in GEN Docket No. 
90-314, and remanded the matter for further proceedings. Freeman 
Engineering Associates, Inc. v. FCC, D.C. Cir. No. 94-1779 (Jan. 7, 
1997). The Office of Engineering and Technology (OET) requests comment 
from QUALCOMM as to what action OET should recommend to the Commission 
in light of the remand. QUALCOMM should file its comments by March 5, 
1997. Any interested parties may then file reply comments by March 20, 
1997.

    For additional information, contact Rodney Small, (202) 418-
2452; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b0908161a17173b1d1818551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="75070618141919351316165b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>, Office of Engineering and Technology.

Federal Communications Commission.
William F. Caton,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4567 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>