alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32764]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-171-000]


Energy 2000 Incorporated, Notice of Issuance of Order

December 11, 1997.
    Energy 2000 Incorporated (Energy 2000) submitted for filing a rate 
schedule under which Energy 2000 will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. Energy 2000 also request 
waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Energy 2000 
requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 
34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability 
by Energy 2000.
    On November 25, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the 
Director, Division of Rate Applications, Office of Electric Power 
Regulation, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, 
subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by Energy 2000 should file a motion to 
intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 
and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.211 and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, Energy 2000 is 
authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as 
a guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security 
of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for 
some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of Energy 2000's issuances of securities or 
assumptions of liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is December 29, 1997. Copies 
of the full text of the order are available from the Commission's 
Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32764 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 

Spousal Consent Letter 
 To: ShanghaiMed
iKang, Inc 
 I, Feiyan Huang (ID No. 110108197010310023), legal spouse of Ligang Zhang (ID No. 110105197103200895), have acknowledged and carefully
read the following agreements signed by Ligang Zhang: 
 Loan Agreement (signed on Jan.12, 2011); Exclusive Call Option Agreement (signed on Mar. 17, 2008);
Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement (signed on Apr. 27, 2007); Power of Attorney (signed on Mar.17, 2008); Share Pledge Agreements (signed respectively on Mar. 17, 2008 and Jan.12, 2011). 

I hereby agree and promise that the 50% equity interest in Shanghai iKang Guobin Holding Co., Ltd. (the “Equity”) held by my legal spouse and
registered is his name will be disposed in compliance with the aforesaid agreements. 
 I fully understand the content and the meaning of the aforesaid
agreements and further promise that no action in conflict with such agreements will be taken, including but not limited to claiming the Equity to be the personal property of me or my legal spouse, or our community property, or the distributable
heritage of me or my legal spouse. I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably waive any right, power or interest granted by applicable laws upon such Equity. 
  


	
	 /s/ Huang Feiyan

	
	Signature
	
	 November 26, 2013

	
	Date
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7420 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the membership of the 

Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans to include veterans who are 

lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 30, 2020 

Ms. DELBENE (for herself, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. KILMER, Mr. 

LYNCH, Ms. NORTON, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. COX of California, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Mr. CISNEROS, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. 

COOPER, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. MOORE, Ms. 

ESHOO, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. YARMUTH, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mrs. HAYES, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

HORSFORD, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. BEYER, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mrs. LOWEY, Ms. HOULAHAN, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. 

MEEKS, Mr. HIMES, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Miss RICE of New York, 

Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. HECK, Ms. 

JAYAPAL, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. RYAN, Ms. WEXTON, Ms. SCHRIER, 

Ms. PORTER, and Mr. QUIGLEY) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the membership of the Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans 

to include veterans who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, 

transgender, or queer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7420 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voices for Veterans 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF MEMBERSHIP OF THE ADVISORY 

5 COMMITTEE ON MINORITY VETERANS TO IN6 CLUDE VETERANS WHO ARE LESBIAN, GAY, 

7 BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, OR QUEER. 

8 (a) EXPANSION OF MEMBERSHIP.—Subsection 

9 (a)(2)(A) of section 544 of title 38, United States Code, 

10 is amended— 

11 (1) in clause (iv), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

12 (2) in clause (v), by striking the period at the 

13 end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following 

15 new clauses: 

16 ‘‘(vi) veterans who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, 

17 transgender, or queer’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Clause (vi) of section 

19 544(a)(2)(A) of title 38, United States Code, shall apply 

20 to appointments made on or after the date of the enact21 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHERIE SAFAPOU, individually, and as 

the parent and natural guardian of J.S.D., a 

minor, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MARIN COUNTY, California; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-15387

D.C. No. 4:17-cv-07042-PJH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2019**

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Cherie Safapou appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of 

state court divorce, custody, and restraining order proceedings. We have 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-15387

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 

F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)); Noel v. 

Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003) (dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman

doctrine). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Safapou’s action for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction because it is a “forbidden de facto appeal” of state court 

divorce, custody, and restraining orders, and raises issues that are “inextricably 

intertwined” with those orders. Noel, 341 F.3d at 1158, 1163; see also Cooper v. 

Ramos, 704 F.3d 772, 779 (9th Cir. 2012) (claims are “inextricably intertwined”

for purposes of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine where “the relief requested in the 

federal action would effectively reverse the state court decision or void its ruling” 

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); Carmona v. Carmona, 603 F.3d 

1041, 1050-51 (9th Cir. 2010) (Rooker-Feldman doctrine barred plaintiff’s claims 

seeking to enjoin state family court orders).

We do not consider documents not filed with the district court, see United 

States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990), or matters not specifically and 

distinctly raised and argued in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 

983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8030-8031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
National Institute of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meetings:

    Name of SEP: Sympathetic Nervous System Modulation and Blood 
Pressure Regulation.
    Date: March 10-11, 1997.
    Time: 7:30 p.m.
    Place: Gaithersburg Marriott Washington Center, 9751 
Washingtonian Boulevard, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878.
    Contact Person: Jon Ranhand, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, Room 
7188, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-0280.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    This notice is being published less than fifteen days prior to 
this meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations 
imposed by the grant review and funding cycle.
    Name of SEP: Response and Adaptation to Exercise.

[[Page 8031]]

    Date: March 25-26, 1997.
    Time: 7:30 p.m.
    Place: Holiday Inn, 2 Montgomery Village Avenue, Gaithersburg, 
Maryland.
    Contact Person: Anthony M. Coelho, Ph.D., Two Rockledge Center, 
Room 7194, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, (301) 435-
0288.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    These meetings will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs Nos. 93.837, Heart 
and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Disease Research; and 
93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes 
of Health.)

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 97-4255 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D2023-2825 

L.T. Case No. 2020-CA-000186-A

_____________________________

CHANTELLE LECCO DECOMO,

Appellant,

v.

DAVID LYLE AND DILLON M.

LECCO,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County,

Lawrence J. Semento, Judge.

Chantelle Lecco DeComo, Tavares, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellees.

June 11, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

 HARRIS, EISNAUGLE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
#### Leon GANDY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION of the State of Florida and the Career Service Commission of the State of Florida, Respondents.

No. FF-258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 17, 1977.

Joseph C. Jacobs and Robert J. Angerer, of Ervin, Varn, Jacobs, Odom & Kitchen, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Raymond W. Gearey, Jr., Betty J. Stef-fens, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Gandy seeks review of a final agency action of the Career Service Commission which sustained a disciplinary suspension ordered by the Department of Offender Rehabilitation. Although the record appears to sustain the charges leveled *1134against petitioner, we are unable to reach the merits of the case because of a procedural problem of due process proportions. The record reveals that during the hearing before the hearing officer counsel for the respective parties became engaged in a controversy as to the issues involved and the admissibility of certain evidence. Finally, the record reveals, both attorneys stated the issue whereupon petitioner’s attorney recited:

> “That is the sole issue and that is the sole question on negligence, and I will stipulate to that, and any other testimony which has been introduced is clearly irrelevant and that is the sole issue, and, therefore, I will object.”

Whereupon the hearing officer stated:

> “Counsel, I’ll agree to your stipulation retrospectively but retroactively. Let’s roll on.”

The issue was thereby narrowly defined as was the scope of the evidence. The record clearly reveals that following that stipulation petitioner’s attorney curtailed the scope of his examination and confined himself to the agreed issue. Nevertheless, as appears from the hearing examiner’s recommended order, the examiner relied upon evidence, objected to, outside the scope of the stipulated issue. Petitioner filed objections to the recommended order but it was adopted and forms the basis for the review now sought.

It is axiomatic that neither a hearing examiner nor a court may, in the absence of consent, either express or implied, consider evidence received over objection which is outside the issues and then rely upon that evidence as a basis for his or its ultimate order. Further, when the issues have been narrowed by stipulation and a party thereby lulled into responding to evidence adduced over his objections outside the issues, such evidence may not be used to his detriment.

The petition is therefore granted and the order of which review is sought is

QUASHED.

McCORD, C. J., and BOYER and MELVIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                             Financial Data Schedule
                  Item 601(c) of Regulation S-K Commercial and
                Industrial Companies Article 5 of Regulation S-X
                (Dollars is thousands, except per share amounts)

This schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
Consolidated Balance Sheet of Pamida  Holdings  Corporation and Subsidiary as of
February 1, 1998 and the related Consolidated Statement of Operations for the 52
weeks then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000864760
<NAME>                                         Pamida Holdings Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-01-1998
<CASH>                                               6,816
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                            50
<INVENTORY>                                        152,927
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   170,965
<PP&E>                                              40,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     260,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              133,544
<BONDS>                                            172,445
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                90
<OTHER-SE>                                         (52,365)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       260,081
<SALES>                                            657,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   657,017
<CGS>                                              495,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      624,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,286
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,286
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      1,735
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5,370
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .91
        


</TABLE>
----

----

EXHIBIT (32)(a)

| (1)   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                                         |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: April 27, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Vinod M. Khilnani                                   |   |
|                 |   | Vinod M. Khilnani                                            |   |
|                 |   | Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                 |   |                                                         |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10- QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul D. Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                             /s/ PAUL D. CLARK
                                             ------------------
                                             PAUL D. CLARK
                                             PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                             AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OCTOBER 20, 2004
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lawrence E. JOHNSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 54383.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 8, 1974.

In re: Lawrence E. Johnson applying for remedial writs and habeas corpus.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of this Court’s supervisory jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                     6,400
<SECURITIES>                              24,790
<RECEIVABLES>                             60,002
<ALLOWANCES>                              (1,237)
<INVENTORY>                               48,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         148,069
<PP&E>                                   106,433
<DEPRECIATION>                           (50,911)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           252,011
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     35,507
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                     165
<OTHER-SE>                               202,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             252,011
<SALES>                                  122,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         122,400
<CGS>                                     42,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             42,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           12,416
<INCOME-TAX>                               3,849
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        8,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               8,567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.55
        


</TABLE>