alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                   CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C.SS.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Decorator Industries, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, William A. Bassett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael K.
Solomon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2007              By: /s/ William A. Bassett
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    William A. Bassett
                                    Chief Executive Officer and President


Date: May 15, 2007              By: /s/ Michael K. Solomon
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Michael K. Solomon
                                    Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 27, 2017

d1218

Order 

Clerk

December 27, 2017

155444

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155444

COA: 335809

Berrien CC: 2009-015792-FC

WALLACE GEORGE CARLYLE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrants' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
February 22, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-22-1998
<CASH>                                          32,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  198,192
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,991
<INVENTORY>                                    137,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               414,967
<PP&E>                                         858,155
<DEPRECIATION>                                 402,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,355,811
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,739
<BONDS>                                        357,206
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,940
<OTHER-SE>                                     586,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,355,811
<SALES>                                      1,910,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,910,164
<CGS>                                        1,466,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,466,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               327,419
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,578
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                   9,722
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.76
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard J. FLYNN, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY CO., Appellee.

No. 72-131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 15, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Glenwood Brooks COBB, Sr., Relator, v. The Honorable W. L. BAILEY, as Circuit Judge of the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, Respondent.

No. HH-68.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 19, 1977.

*850Bill A. Corbin Law Offices, P.A., Blounts-town, for relator.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Douglas C. Kearney, and Joseph W. Lawrence, II, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

SMITH, Judge.

We issued a rule nisi in prohibition on relator’s showing that the respondent circuit judge, having recused himself from consideration of the dissolution issues in this case of marital strife, improperly proceeded to hear and determine the wife’s motion for contempt process against relator. Respondent has filed a return to the rule and we have considered the case on briefs and a transcript of the circuit court’s proceedings. The respondent circuit judge, sensitive to an appearance of impropriety in his consideration of emotional issues between parties with whom the judge had social and business relations for “quite a long time,” invited an oral suggestion for recusal, which relator made, and recused himself from consideration of the case. The court reserved power, however, to act immediately on imminent questions of temporary alimony and child support and temporary use and possession of an automobile and household items. While relator acquiesced in the court’s retention of limited jurisdiction, relator affirmatively objected when, nearly four weeks later, .the respondent judge undertook disposition of the wife’s petition that relator be held in contempt for disobedience to the court’s order temporarily regulating the parties’ property affairs pending a full hearing before another judge.

We consider that the respondent judge’s recusal order effectively deprived that judge of authority to preside in the contempt proceedings. In these circumstances, the trial court’s order temporarily fixing the parties’ obligations pending final hearing may stand, but the wife’s petition for contempt proceedings should have been and must now be referred to another circuit judge. A recusal entered on informal motion in lieu of formal disqualification proceedings ends the judge’s power to take part in the disposition of the case. *Gilmer v. Shell Oil Co.,*324 So.2d 171 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). The contempt order is vacated and a writ of prohibition will issue.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 11


                               DBA SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                   (in thousands, except per share information) 
                                  (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
	                                        Three Months Ended  		 Six Months Ended
	                                            December 31	          December 31
<S>                                         <C>       <C>        <C>       <C>	
                                           1997      1996      	1997     	1996

Net income	(A)                         	$  386  	 $  372 	     $ 920  	 $  695	

Weighted average shares outstanding	(B) 	4,427    	4,474      	4,425    	4,479	
Incremental shares - stock options	 	       77	       47	         53	       34	
Total	(C)	                               4,504    	4,521	      4,478   	 4,513	


Basic Earnings per Share	(A/B)          	$ .09    	$ .08       $	.21    	$ .16 	


Diluted Earnings per Share	(A/C)        	$ .09    	$ .08	      $ .21    	$ .15 	
</TABLE>
<PAGE>12
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 234 (Friday, December 5, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management
[OR-014-08-3110-00-H040, GP8-0049]


Notice of Direct Sale of Public Lands in Klamath County, Oregon--
Correction

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In the Notice of Direct Sale of Public Lands in Klamath 
County, Oregon beginning on page 53019 in the issue of Friday, October 
10, 1997 Volume 62, Number 197 make the following correction:
    On page 53019 in the third column, the first sentence in paragraph 
one of the Summary lists the appraised fair market value as 
$645,000.00. The appraised fair market value should be changed to 
$625,400.00.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
A. Barron Bail,
Area Manager, Klamath Falls Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 97-31850 Filed 12-4-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Joseph Sinicropi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Laboratories, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005


                                                     /s/ Joseph Sinicropi
                                                     --------------------
                                                         Joseph Sinicropi
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1101]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-209-000]


Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation; Notice of Filing 
Calculations of Excess Revenues

January 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 27, 1996, Columbia Gas Transmission 
Corporation (Columbia) tendered for filing a report in order to set 
forth adjustments to the Excess Revenue credited to its firm 
transportation customers. Columbia filed its last report of Excess 
Revenue calculations of March 13, 1996 following termination of its 
Excess Revenue Crediting Mechanism pursuant to the order of the 
Commission in Docket No. RP95-408.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest this filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed on or before 
January 9, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person wishing to 
become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection 
in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-347 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7798

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALAIN DJELILATE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR98-128-PJM, CA-00-252-PJM) Submitted: June 21, 2001 Decided: June 27, 2001 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alain Djelilate, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alain Djelilate appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Djelilate , Nos. CR-98-128-PJM; CA-00-252- PJM (D. Md. filed Oct. 31, 2000; entered Nov. 1, 2000). We deny the motion to strike the informal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit** **32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION** **906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 28, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Lawrence E. Hyatt, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| /s/ LAWRENCE E. HYATT                                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Lawrence E. Hyatt                                               |
| *Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer*** |
| March 12, 2009                                             |
Exhibit  99.1

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datametrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel
Bertram Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  DANIEL  BERTRAM
---------------------------------
Daniel  Bertram
Chief  Executive  Officer
October 7, 2002

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             306
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                       146
<INVENTORY>                                     15,291
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,448
<PP&E>                                          24,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,589
<SALES>                                         27,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,080
<CGS>                                           19,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,762
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    309
<INCOME-TAX>                                       125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                184
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       184
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
#### James THOMAS, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47228.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 5, 1973.

Lawrence D. Arrington, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Karen Gil-foy, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.
DEBENTURE EXTENSION - Carroll

  
 iWallet Corporation | 7394 Trade Street | San Diego, CA 92196-3418 | (800) 508-5042
  
 July 13, 2021
  
 To: iWallet Debenture Holders
  
 Dear Sir/Madam:
  
 We refer to the secured convertible debentures issued by iWallet Corporation (the “Company”), dated April 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 (the “Debenture”) issued to the undersigned debentureholder (the “Debentureholder”). The Company is requesting permission to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) until April 30, 2022. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Debenture.
  
 The Company and the Debentureholder hereby amends the Debentures as follows:
  
 1. Each reference to the Maturity Date in the Debenture shall be amended to reflect “April 30, 2022”.
  
 All other terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect unamended and time shall continue to be of the essence.
  
 If you are in agreement with the terms and conditions of this letter, please sign and return to my attention.
  
 Yours truly,
  
 IWALLET CORPORATION
  
 By: /s/ Steve Cabouli
 “Authorized Signing Officer”
  
 The undersigned hereby acknowledges and consents to the above noted amendment, extending the Maturity Date until April 30, 2022.
  
 	 If Debentureholder is a corporation, trust, partnership or other entity:
	  
	 If Debentureholder is an individual:

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 /s/ Donal Carroll

	 Name of Entity
	  
	 Signature

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 Donal Carroll

	 Signature of Person Signing
	  
	 Name of Individual

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  

	 Title of Person Signing
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE FEDERA TRAE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Timothy J. Muris, Chairman

Mozelle W. Thompson

Orson Swindle

Thomas B. Leary

Pamela Jones Harbour

CHICAGO BRIGE & mON COMPAN

a corporation, and

CHICAGO BRIGE & IRON COMPAN N.

, )

a foreign corporation

Docket No. 9300

In the Matter of

PITT-DES MOINES, INC.

a corporation.

ORDER PRESCRIING DEADLINE FOR FILING

ANSWER TO COMPLAINT COUNSEL'S EMERGENCY MOTION

Complaint Counsel in this matter have filed an Emergency Motion for Authorization To

Seek Inunctive Relief To Preserve Provo Fabrication Plant As A Going Concern Pending

Completion Of Administrative Litigation. Because ofthe need to determine on an expedited

basis whether this Emergency Motion should be granted or denied, in whole or in par, the

Commission -- pursuant to Commssion Rule 3.22(c), 16 C. R. g 3.22(c) (2003) -- hereby

designates Friday, December 12 2003 , as the date by which the Respondents must fie an

Answer, if any, to the Emergency Motion. If Respondents do not fie an Answer by that date

they shall be deemed, pursuant to Rule 3.22(c), to have consented to the granting of the relief

asked for in the Emergency Motion. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT if Respondents choose to file an Answer to the Emergency

Motion, they shall file such Answer on or before Friday, December 12 2003.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretar

ISSUED: December 5, 2003