alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000026285
<NAME> CURTICE BURNS FOODS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-23-1995
<CASH>                                            6228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    71947
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     211590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                308135
<PP&E>                                          273827
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  707280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           175252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      137372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    707280
<SALES>                                         373364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                373364
<CGS>                                           279141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    78129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4911)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3711)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (3711)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 12, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.
    Special Request: In order to conduct the survey described below in 
January 1998, the Department of the Treasury is requesting that the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve this 
information collection by December 24, 1997. To obtain a copy of this 
study, please contact the Internal Revenue Service Clearance Officer at 
the address listed below.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

OMB Number: 1545-1432.
Project Number: M:SP:V 97-033-G.
Type of Review: Revision.
Title: Business Information Center Survey.
Description: The purpose of this survey is to help determine the 
efficiency of a pilot that is being undertaken by the Internal Revenue 
Service (IRS) and the Small Business Administration (SBA). In an effort 
to enhance the opportunity and ability for small business owners/
opertors to obtain tax materials and understand tax requirements and 
responsibilities, eleven separate IRS small business edcuation products 
will be offered at selected SBA facilities known as Business 
Information Centers (BIC). Initially, five ``high traffic'' BICs will 
participate in the pilot program. Education materials will be stocked 
at each of these BICs and restocked as needed. The pilot will run for 
up to one year. During the one year period, a decision will be made to 
either expand or end the program. The IRS plans to conduct a survey to 
determine the effectiveness of this program.
Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 100 (at 5 sites).
Estimated Burden Hours Per Response: 3 minutes.
Frequency of Response: Other (one time only).
Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 3,250 hours.
Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt (202) 395-7860, Office of Management 
and Budget, room 10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports, Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-33132 Filed 12-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5941-9]


Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Petition for Review

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as 
amended (``Act''), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a 
proposed settlement agreement, which was filed with the United States 
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by the United 
States Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') on October 16, 1997, 
to address a lawsuit filed by the Appalachian Power Company and other 
electric utilities. Appalachian Power Company, et al., v. United States 
Environmental Protection Agency, No 93-1631. This lawsuit, which was 
filed pursuant to section 307(b) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7607(b), is a 
petition for review of the modeling assumptions required for existing 
point source and new or modified point source compliance demonstrations 
as set forth in Tables 9-1 and 9-2 of the ``Guideline on Air Quality 
Models'' (the ``Modeling Guidelines'') regulations published at 58 FR 
38816 (July 20, 1993) and codified in Appendix W of 40 CFR Part 51. The 
proposed settlement agreement provides that EPA will issue specified 
guidance on interpretation of parts of the Tables in question and will 
propose to incorporate that guidance into the Modeling Guideline.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication 
of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the 
proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as 
parties to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of Justice 
may withhold or withdraw consent to the proposed settlement agreement 
if the comments disclose facts or circumstances that indicate that such 
consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with 
the requirements of the Act.
    A copy of the proposed settlement agreement was filed with the 
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of 
Columbia Circuit on October 16, 1997. Copies are also available from 
Phyllis Cochran, Air and Radiation Division (2344), Office of General 
Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, S.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20460, (202) 260-7606. Written comments should be sent 
to Alexander Schmandt at the address above and must be submitted on or 
before January 29, 1998.

    Dated: December 18, 1997.
Scott C. Fulton,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 97-33964 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Cascade Microtech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Killian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jeff Killian       
|Jeff Killian           
|Chief Financial Officer
|Cascade Microtech, Inc.
|March 1, 2011          

This certification is made solely for the
purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Microtech, Inc. and will be retained by Cascade Microtech, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130204 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

BIORESOURCE, INC., Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

and 

OPPMAC, INC.,

Intervening

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130204 

 COA: 266668 
 Wayne CC: 01-123531-CH

CITY OF DETROIT, JOE 

VASSALLO, PAUL BERNARD,

and FREDERICK ROTTACH, 

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

CENTRAL MAINTENANCE 

SERVICES, INC., SAM FODALE, 

JERRY FODALE, STATE OF

MICHIGAN, and DIAMOND 

DISMANTLING, INC., 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the 

Court of Appeals. 

l0221 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 27, 2006 

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 11 Cotton States Life Insurance Company
Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) The following computations set forth the calculations of basic and diluted net
income per common share and common share equivalents for the three-month period
ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. Basic
    
    DilutedIncome
    
    IncomePer Share
    
    Per ShareFor the three months ended September 30, 2004
Net income
    
    $
    1,242
    
    
    
    1,242Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,323
    
    
    
    6,323Common share equivalents resulting
from: dilutive stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    92restricted stock
    
    
    
    
    
    
    233Adjusted weighted average number
of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,323
    
    
    
    6,648Net income per common share
    
    $
    0.20
    
    
    
    0.19For the three months ended September 30, 2003
Net income
    
    $
    1,885
    
    
    
    1,885Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,324
    
    
    
    6,324Common share equivalents resulting
from: dilutive stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    61restricted stock
    
    
    
    
    
    
    233Adjusted weighted average number
of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,324
    
    
    
    6,618Net income per common share
    
    $
    0.30
    
    
    
    0.29




---



##### 



Exhibit 11 Cotton States Life Insurance Company
Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) The following computations set forth the calculations of basic and diluted net
income per common share and common share equivalents for the nine month period
ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. Basic
    
    DilutedIncome
    
    IncomePer Share
    
    Per ShareFor the nine months ended September 30, 2004
Net income
    
    $
    3,537
    
    
    
    3,537Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,323
    
    
    
    6,323Common share equivalents resulting
from: dilutive stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    92restricted stock
    
    
    
    
    
    
    233Adjusted weighted average number
of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,323
    
    
    
    6,648Net income per common share
    
    $
    0.56
    
    
    
    0.53For the nine months ended September 30, 2003
Net income
    
    $
    5,017
    
    
    
    5,017Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,324
    
    
    
    6,324Common share equivalents resulting
from: dilutive stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    60restricted stock
    
    
    
    
    
    
    233Adjusted weighted average number
of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
    
    
    6,324
    
    
    
    6,617Net income per common share
    
    $
    0.79
    
    
    
    0.76
#### UNISERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. MERCURY LINEN SERVICE, INC., Appellee.

No. 309.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

March 20, 1970.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James H. Walden, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3977]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP85-60-010]


Overthrust Pipeline Company; Notice of Report of Refunds

February 12, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 4, 1997, Overthrust Pipeline Company 
(Overthrust) tendered for filing a refund report. Overthrust states 
that the report documents refunds of amounts pertaining to and 
detailing the Deferred Income Tax (DIT) refund payments for the year 
1996.
    Overthurst states that it is filing the refund report pursuant to a 
Commission order dated May 21, 1991, ``Order Approving Settlement with 
Modifications'' in Docket Nos. RP85-60-000 and -002. Overthrust 
explains that Article V of the settlement as modified, requires 
Overthrust to file an annual report 60-days after making the actual DIT 
refunds.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Regulations. All such protests should be filed on or 
before February 20, 1997. Protests will be considered by the Commission 
in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve 
to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing 
are on file with the Commission and are available for public 
inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3977 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 435 V

Filed: November 19, 2020

UNPUBLISHED

MIRANDA SELLERS

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Master Horner

Ruling for Entitlement; Table Injury;

Influenza Vaccine ( Flu ); Shoulder
Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Michael Patrick Milmoe, Law Offices of Leah V. Duran, Washington, DC , for petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On March 23, 2018 , petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood
Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 10

- 34 (2012), alleging that as a result of a n

influenza (“ flu ”) vaccination that s he received on October 3 , 2016, s he suffered a right
Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administra tion (“SIRVA”)

. (ECF No. 1.)

Respondent initially filed a Rule 4 Report on April 30, 2019, recommending

against compensation based on his review of the record at that time. (ECF No. 18.)
Following further development of the record in this case, o n November 18, 2020

,

r espondent filed an amended Rule 4(c) report in which he advised the Court that “he is
now of the opinion that petitioner is entitled to compensation for a Table injury of SIRVA

after flu vaccination .” (ECF No. 47, p. 2.) Specificall y, respondent stated that “[t]here

were no other causes identified for petitioner’s SIRVA

, ” and that the medical records
indicate that “petitioner has suffered the sequela of her injury for more than six months.”

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to iden tify and move to
redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such
material from public a ccess.2

( Id

. at 7. ) Consequently, respondent believes that “petitioner has satisfied all legal

prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” ( Id. )

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Daniel T. Horner

Daniel T. Horner

S pecial Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                        5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS,  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS,  STATEMENT OF
STOCKHOLDERS'  EQUITY (DEFICIENCY) AND STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FROM FORM 10Q FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           OCT-2-1999
<CASH>                                      9,089
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                              95,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                4,896
<INVENTORY>                                59,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           10,088
<PP&E>                                     19,797
<DEPRECIATION>                             10,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            284,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     122,038
<BONDS>                                   155,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              284,552
<SALES>                                 1,038,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,044,277
<CGS>                                     942,237
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           1,020,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              379
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         12,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            10,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                4,814
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         5,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                5,584
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 28, 2021

No. 04-21-00083-CV

Daniel ROUNDTREE,

Appellant

v.

Chandravadan BHAKTA,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CV04583

Honorable J Frank Davis, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by June 21, 2021. On June 28, 2021, we sent 

appellant a notice that his brief had not been timely filed and requested an explanation from 

appellant by July 8, 2021. Appellant has not filed a brief, motion for extension or time, or 

explanation. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, within fifteen (15) days of the date of 

this order, his brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) his failure to timely file a 

brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. 

If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response, we will dismiss the appeal for 

want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal if an appellant fails to comply with a court order).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of July, 2021.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7230-7231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3870]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal

[[Page 7231]]

Reserve Bank indicated. Once the notices have been accepted for 
processing, they will also be available for inspection at the offices 
of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views 
in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later 
than March 4, 1997.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Genie D. Short, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Clyde Crews, as Trustee for the Grossman Trust, both of San 
Antonio, Texas; to retain power to vote 99 percent of the voting shares 
of InterContinental Bank Shares Corporation, San Antonio, Texas, and 
thereby indirectly acquire InterContinental National Bank, San Antonio, 
Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 11, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-3870 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F