alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7220 

To require the Corps of Engineers to include study of the impacts of sealevel rise and low-frequency precipitation events in addition to the impacts of coastal hurricanes in certain studies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2020 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, and 

Mr. ESPAILLAT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Corps of Engineers to include study of the 

impacts of sea-level rise and low-frequency precipitation 

events in addition to the impacts of coastal hurricanes 

in certain studies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hudson River Climate 

5 Change Protection Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7220 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF THE STUDY OF SEA-LEVEL RISE AND 

2 LOW-FREQUENCY PRECIPITATION EVENTS IN 

3 CERTAIN CORPS OF ENGINEERS STUDIES. 

4 In carrying out the examination and survey required 

5 under the Act of June 15, 1955 (Public Law 84–71; 69 

6 Stat. 132), and the study and report required under the 

7 heading ‘‘Corps of Engineers—Civil—Investigations’’ 

8 under title II of Division A of the Disaster Relief Appro9 priations Act, 2013 (Public Law 113–2), the Corps of En10 gineers shall— 

11 (1) immediately begin to include as an addi12 tional subject of such examination and study the 

13 threat of sea-level rise and low-frequency precipita14 tion events and the impacts of sea-level rise and low15 frequency precipitation events on the environment, 

16 communities, and ecosystem services; and 

17 (2) carry out such examination and study in ac18 cordance with section 1001 of the Water Resources 

19 Reform and Development Act (33 U.S.C. 2282c). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

ERICK LEVON TOWNSEND

NO. 2021 KW 1561

FEBRUARY 14, 2022

In Re: Erick Levon Townsend, applying for supervisory writs, 

20th Judicial District Court, Parish of West

Feliciana, No. 19- WCR- 043. 

BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

Pmc

JEW

MRT

CRT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY ' L ` RK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
exhibit4k.htm


 



Exhibit 4(k)







 



		
Kathryn A. Cassidy


Senior Vice President and GE Treasurer


 


General Electric Company


3135 Easton Turnpike


Fairfield, CT 06828







 


 


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, DC 20549


 


February 27, 2014













	
Subject: 

	
General Electric Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 – File No. 001-00035












Dear Sirs:


 


Neither General Electric Company (the “Company”) nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, under which the total amount of securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR Sec. 229.601), the Company hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of each instrument that defines the rights of holders of such long term debt not filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.


 


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY




























	
/s/ Kathryn A. Cassidy

	  
	
Kathryn A. Cassidy

	  
	
Senior Vice President and GE Treasurer
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REVIEWREPORT

 

 

Board of Directors andShareholders

Cubic Corporation

 

 

We have reviewed theaccompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as ofDecember 31, 2003, and the related consolidated condensed statements of incomeand cash flows for the three-month period ended December 31, 2003 and2002.  These financial statements arethe responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews inaccordance with standards established by the American Institute of CertifiedPublic Accountants.  A review of interimfinancial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures tofinancial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial andaccounting matters.  It is substantiallyless in scope than an audit in accordance with auditing standards generallyaccepted in the United States, which will be performed for the full year withthe objective of expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements takenas a whole.  Accordingly, we do notexpress such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we arenot aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanyingconsolidated condensed financial statements referred to above for them to be inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

 

We have previously audited, inaccordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, theconsolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2003 andthe related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equityand cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our reportdated November 19, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on thoseconsolidated financial statements.  Inour opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidatedcondensed balance sheet at September 30, 2003, is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which ithas been derived.

 

 
|                   | ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|------------------------|-----------------------|
|                   |
|                   |
| San Diego,  California |
| January 26,  2004      |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7294]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3933]



[[Page 7294]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 4)]


Railroad Cost Recovery Procedures-Productivity Adjustment

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Proposed adoption of a railroad cost recovery procedures 
productivity adjustment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation Board proposes to adopt 1.050 
(5.0%) as the measure of average growth in railroad productivity for 
the 1991-1995 (5-year) period. The current value of 5.9% was developed 
for the 1990 to 1994 period.

DATES: Comments are due by March 5, 1997.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The proposed productivity adjustment is effective 30 
days after the date of service.

ADDRESSES: Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, Surface 
Transportation Board, Washington, D.C. 20423.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: H. Jeff Warren, (202) 927-6243. TDD 
for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC NEWS & DATA, INC., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423, telephone (202) 289-
4357. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through TDD 
services (202) 927-5721.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: February 6, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3933 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
# l

' ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Symbion-Ozdil-Al Namarq Joint Venture ) ) Under Contract No. W91GXY-06-C-0072 ) ASBCA No. 59057

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Timothy A. Diemand, Esq. Wiggin and Dana LLP Hartford, CT APPEARANCES FOR OTHE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Stephen P. Smith, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed withprejudice. Dated: April 5, 2019

DONALDE.KlNNER Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59057, Appeal ofSymbion-Ozdil-Al Namarq Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# City 

# o/filan2ogordo

OFFICE OFTHEMAYOR 1376 E. NINTH STREET• ALAMOGORDO, NEW MEXKO 88310-5838 • (575) 439-4205 FAX (575) 439

-4396
December 16, 20\1

Docket Operations M-30, WestBuilding Gr<:mnd Floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590
I am writing this letter in response to the tentative order regarding the termination ofthe EAS Subsidy and to show cause why the Department should not terminate the eligibility of Alamogordo/Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico under the Essential Air Service (EAS) program and allow Pacific Wings L.L.C., d/b/a New Mexico Airlines (New Mexico Airlines), to suspend service atthe community.
I believe that conformance to Public Law 112-27, signed into law on August 5, 2011, can be obtained in this community by modifying Order 2011-7-2 with Pacific Wings L.L.C., d/b/a New Mexico Airlines. The modification could allow far the reduction in the frequency of flights to save operational expenses, roundtrip service to a different hub that will increase passengertraffic,

. or a combination ofboth. Many communities have air service to various locations that do not offer roundtrip service on a daily basis to hubs. Also, roundtrip service to a hub that offers citizens more travel options including international**destina~ions** would increase passenger traffic which would lower the average subsidy perpassenger. The German Air Force Flying Training Center has recently announced that the Euro Fighter will be training at Holloman Air Force Base in the near future. This will increase the number of Luftwaffe personnel and dependants by 30% in Alan10gordo. The Commander ofthe German Air Force Flying Training Center has indicated that a direct flight to a hub from the White Sands Regional Airport that has international connections would be heavily utilized by their personnel and dependants. Phoenix International Airport has been mentioned as a preferred hub.
Please consider modifying Order 2011-7

-2 to allow conformance with Public Law 112-27 to continue the Essential Air Service Subsidy for Alamogordo/Holloman Air Force Base New Mexico. Sincerely,

# ~ 

# R:r: Gnggs

# ~;- Mayor, City ofAlamogordo I

·...

)**·· i** 
; ,_ J

_ . :..:

..... .

..

### Cc: Honorable Susana Martinez, Governor Honorable Jeff Bingaman, United States Senator Honorable Tom Udall, United States Senator Honorable Steve Pearce, United States Congressman Honorable Zachary J. Cook, New Mexico Representative Honorable Yvette Herrell, New Mexico Representative Honorable Dennis J. Kintigh, New Mexico Representative Honorable Rick Little, New Mexico Representative Honorable Vernon D. Asbill, New Mexico Senator Honorable William F. Burt, New Mexico Senator Alamogordo City Commission
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Annual Report of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. (the
'Company') on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), I, Steven
S. Skalicky, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.

                                                  /s/ STEVEN S. SKALICKY
                                           .....................................

                                                    Steven S. Skalicky
                                                 Executive Vice President
                                               and Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 12, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or as a
separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED EARNINGS.
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               2,643
<SECURITIES>                                        57,118
<RECEIVABLES>                                       63,580
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1,635)
<INVENTORY>                                         39,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   172,552
<PP&E>                                             146,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (59,483)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     291,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               51,146
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               171
<OTHER-SE>                                         225,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       291,486
<SALES>                                             67,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    67,800
<CGS>                                               27,072
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       27,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8,946
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,863
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  6,083
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         6,083
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.39



</TABLE>
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATION, } Complainant, } } V. } } 

### FISHERSCIENTIFIC COMPANY, LLC, } Respondent. } IntheMatter ofFisher Scientific Company, LLC DocketNo. FAA-2015-1321 (Civil Penalty Action) Judge Goodwin



### REQUEST TO CORRECT SERVICE LIST

The ChiefAdministrative Law Judge issued a Notice ofAssignment ofProceeding, which included a service list showingthe following physical address for Respondent's counsel: Jeny W. Cox, Esq. 2729 Gallows Rd., Suite 401 Vienna, VA 22180 Respondent's counsel has movedto the following street address, effective immediately: Jerry 

### W. Cox, Esq. 2050 Jamieson Ave., Snite 1212 Alexandria, VA 22314
Please take notethat mail directed to the former address will not be forwarded.
Counsel's email and other contactinformation have not changed. Respondent requests once again that service copies or any other orders or other documents arising from this matterbe sent electronically. Counsel will promptly acknowledge receipt ofany such communications.WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests that the new, abovementioned address be substituted for the former address in the Service List in this case.

Dated: November 18,2015 Respectfully submitted,

amieson Ave.,Suite 1212 Alexandria, VA 22314 (email) jcox@potomacstrategyassociates.com (tel) 703-757-5866 Counsel for Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., and Fisher Scientific Co., LLC

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OnNovember 18, 2015, the undersigned sentby electronic and First Class U.S. Postal Mail one copy ofthe foregoing Requestto coJTect Service List to each ofthe persons listed below. [One Copy] William Vines, Esq. Regional Counsel, AS0-7 U.S. Department ofTransportation Federal Aviation Administration Southern Region 1701 Columbia Ave. College Park, GA 30337 [One Copy] The Hon. Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 [Original and One Copy] HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Federal Aviation Administration Wilbur Wright Bldg., Suite 2W1000 600 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591
Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000

v
CBIC Control fVUritiber 

357050 

RECEIVED 

OPPT CBIC 

1013 NOV 19 AM 10 : 48 

To whom it may concern at the Environmental Protection Agency at the Document Control Office (DCO) 

(7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), U . S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

ATTN : 40 CFR 799.5089; Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112. . 

I am writing this letter on behalf of SAM HPRP Chemicals Inc. My name is Apoorva Shah, the Vice 

President of Operations. 

This is in regards to the The Federal Register Notice for Testing of Certain High Production Volume 

Chemicals; Third Group of Chemicals (76 FR 65385 ; published on October 21, 2011 . 

We, SAM HPRP Chemicals, have not imported or manufactured benzenesulfonic acid, 3-nitro-, sodium 

salt (1:1) (CASRN 127-68-4) since September 2011 when we imported 5,OOOkg. This is not a product that 

we carry or sell, and it was over 2 years ago when we sold the last batch. 

This is a letter to explain that we, SAM HPRP Chemicals, are not subject to the test rule . We have not, 

and have no plans in the future to import, manufacture, or re-sell material as we do not do business in 

the industries which benzenesulfonic acid, 3-nitro-, sodium salt (1:1) is being used in . 

The benzenesulfonic acid, 3-nitro-, sodium salt (1 :1), which we have imported and sold goes into 

formulation at the end user into forming other chemicals. - 

Please contact me with any questions, and thank you for your time . 

Regards, 

Apoorva Shah 

SAM HPRP Chemicals Inc. 

952.974.9174 

apoorva shah@samhprp.com 

11-13-13
1 Introduction and Plan Contents

Petrobras America Inc. Page 1-13

Development Operations Coordination Document

Cascade / Chinook Development Project

Location Plat 1-2 is provided for the subject well Cascade East Development

Well No. 7.
1 Introduction and Plan Contents

Page 1-14 Petrobras America Inc.

Development Operations Coordination Document

Cascade / Chinook Development Project

The overall field layout for Phase II of the development plan is presented in Figure 1-3 at

a scale which allows a review of all facilities. Figures 1-4 (FPSO detail) and 1-5

(Cascade East Drill Center) present the facilities at a scale which provides a greater level

of detail.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 20435 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
EMILIO MEDRANO RENTERIA, also known as Ricardo Medrano, also known as Emilio Medrano, also known as Emilio Renteria Medrano ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:08

- CR

- 17

- 1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emilio Medrano
Renteria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medrano Renteria h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-20435 Document: 00513472124 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016No. 15

- 20435

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessmen t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-20435 Document: 00513472124 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016