alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
254 La. 837

#### Elton MAYES, Sr. v. CROSBY CHEMICALS, INC.

No. 50080.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Elton Mayes, Sr. applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Beauregard. 225 So.2d 57.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case as found by the court of appeal there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANGELO PANETTIER I

, Appellant,

v.

PEOPLE’S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY

, Appellee.

No. 4D 20

- 2624

[ April 2 0 , 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 20

- 005074

.

Mark A. Nation of The Nation Law Firm, LLP, Longwood, for appellant.

Mark D. Tinker of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P. A., Tampa, and Brett

Frankel, Jonathan Sabghir and Jake A. Tover of People’s Trust Ins urance

Co mpany , Deerfield Beach , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed. See Dodge v. People’s Tr. Ins. Co. , 321 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 4th

DCA 202 1 )

.

C ONNER

, C.J., F ORST and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Mack Arthur AGNEW, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-727.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 30, 1970.

Mack Arthur Agnew in pro. per., and Walter R. Talley, Public Defender, and D. Turner Matthews, Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Mack Arthur Agnew, was tried and found guilty of the crime of robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years in the state prison. Thereafter, appellant filed his notice of appeal together with his brief, these being filed in pro. per. In addition to appellant’s brief, the public defender in and for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit filed an “Anders” brief,1 and asked to withdraw as counsel.

We have studied the briefs and all other matters filed in this cause and find them to be without merit. Therefore, the order appealed from is affirmed and the public defender’s motion to withdraw as counsel is granted.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

1

. See Anders v. California (1967), 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.
#### The ESSEX HOUSE, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. Yetta TRASK, Appellee.

No. 70-1262.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 23, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
National Institute of General Medical Sciences Review Committee 
meeting:

    Committee Name: Minority Biomedical Research Support Review 
Subcommittee.
    Date: March 27-28, 1997.
    Time of Meeting: 8:30 a.m-5 p.m.
    Open Session: 8:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m.--March 27.
    Agenda: Special reports related to committee activities.
    Closed Session: 9:30 a.m.-5 p.m.--March 27. 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.--
March 28.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31--Conference 
Room 8, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIGMS, 45 Center Drive, Room 1AS-19, Bethesda, MD 
20892-6200, 301-594-2048.
    Purpose: To review institutional research training grant 
applications.

    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated above, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to 
attend and need special assistance, such as sign language 
interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should inform the 
Contact Person listed above in advance of the meeting.
    This meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions 
set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. 
Applications and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.821, 
Biophysics and Physiological Sciences; 93.859, Pharmacological 
Sciences; 93.862, Genetrics Research; 93.863, Cellular and Molecular 
Basis of Disease Research; 93.880, Minority Access Research Careers 
[MARC]; and 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support (MBRS).

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 97-4257 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
No. 00-7632.

#### Perez *v.*Turk, Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 89.8.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Del Global Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
A. Risher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:
                /s/
      James A. RisherName:
                James
      A. RisherTitle:
                Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:
                December
      16, 2008
 
 
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
#### Catherine T. PELHAM, Appellant, v. Lynwood Earl GRAHAM, a minor, William C. Graham and Government Employees Insurance Company, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, Appellees.

No. 71-167.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 26, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Equivalent of Birds
Eye Foods, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 24, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Earl L. Powers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

      Date: March 20, 2006             /s/ Earl L. Powers
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer and
                                       Secretary
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

                                       6
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2619 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2619

    To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the 
 entities will not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity 
                      that performs, an abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2021

Mrs. Fischbach (for herself, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Aderholt, 
 Mr. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Biggs, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Mann, Mr. Allen, Mr. 
 Carter of Georgia, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. Mooney, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Kelly 
 of Mississippi, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Babin, Mrs. Miller of 
   Illinois, Mr. Jackson, Mr. Waltz, Mrs. Boebert, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. 
 Emmer, Mrs. McClain, Mr. Rose, Mr. Harris, Mrs. Lesko, Mr. Grothman, 
 Mr. Budd, Mr. Owens, and Mr. Stauber) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the 
 entities will not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity 
                      that performs, an abortion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ABORTION.

    (a) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be provided (directly or 
indirectly, including through contract or subcontract) to an entity 
unless the entity certifies that, during the period for which such 
funds are provided, the entity will not perform, and will not provide 
any funds to any other entity that performs, an abortion.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to an 
abortion where--
            (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest; or
            (2) a physician certifies that the woman suffers from a 
        physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that 
        would place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is 
        performed, including a life-threatening physical condition 
        caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section, the term ``entity'' means the 
entire legal entity, including any entity that controls, is controlled 
by, or is under common control with such entity.
                                 <all>
```
DURLAND & COMPANY, CPAs
                           A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
                         340 ROYAL PALM WAY, 3RD FLOOR
                              PALM BEACH, FL 33480
                         (561)822-9995 -- FAX 822-9942


STEPHEN H. DURLAND, CPA*                          MEMBERS OF:
     ------------                                 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CPAs
ALSO CERTIFIED IN CA, CO, GA, LA                  --SEC PRACTICE SECTION
MA, MO, MD, MC, NJ, NY, SC, TX, WI                -- TAX DIVISION
                                                  FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF CPAs

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, C.D. 20549

Gentlemen:

         We have read and agree with the comments in Item 4 of the Form 8-K as
filed on July 23, 1999 and Form 8-K Amendment 1 expected to be filed on August
4, 1999 of Internet Cable Corporation.

                                             /S/ DURLAND & COMPANY, CPAs, P.A.
                                             ---------------------------------
                                                 Durland & Company, CPAs, P.A.


Palm Beach, Florida
4 August 1999
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 24-1235

___________________________ Jason Ray Clark lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Zach Carter; Sara Carter lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota ____________ Submitted: August 12, 2024 Filed: August 22, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before SMITH, BENTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Jason Ray Clark appeals the district court 1 order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss his diversity action. After careful de novo review of the record, the parties’

1 The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.submissions on appeal, and the issues properly before us, we find no basis for

reversal. See Dittmer Props., L.P. v. FDIC , 708 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE TEMTEX INDUSTRIES,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED MAY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                             287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                       469
<INVENTORY>                                      8,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,189
<PP&E>                                          28,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,426
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           718
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,010
<SALES>                                         30,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,550
<CGS>                                           22,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (107)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   233
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    482
<INCOME-TAX>                                       193
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                289
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       289
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William W. Boyle, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 
|   | /s/   W. W. Boyle                                    |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | W.   W. Boyle                                        |   |
|   | Senior   Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |                                                 |   |
|   | Date:   May 4, 2011                             |   |

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Robert E. GRISWALD v. PRESIDING JUDGE, SECTION “J” CRIMINAL PARISH COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS.

No. 61102.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Robert E. Griswald applying for writ of mandamus. Parish of Orleans.

Denied. Moot.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20641

Conference Calendar

 

JOHN THOMAS BAGLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-96-CV-1985

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 Texas prisoner John Thomas Bagley, No. 652853, is BARRED from

proceeding in forma pauperis (IFP) under the Prison Litigation

Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) because, on at least three prior

occasions while incarcerated, Bagley has brought an action or

appeal in a United States court that was dismissed as frivolous. 

See Bagley v. Johnson, No. 97-20667 (5th Cir. Dec. 9, 1997); 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g); Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th

Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Bagley’s IFP status is DECERTIFIED, and
No. 97-20641

-2-

he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while

he is in prison unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g). The appeal is DISMISSED. 

 Bagley has 15 days from the date of this opinion to pay the

full appellate filing fee of $105 to the clerk of the district

court, should he wish to reinstate his appeal. 

 IFP DECERTIFIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 111-112]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission


Sunshine Act Meeting

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 1-98]
    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings and oral hearings for the transaction of Commission business 
and other matters specified, as follows:

Date and Time:
    Monday, January 12, 1998, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Wednesday, January 14, 1998, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Friday, January 16, 1998, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Wednesday, January 21, 1998, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Friday, January 23, 1998, 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Subject Matter:
    (1) Oral Hearings and Hearings on the Record on Objections to 
Individual Proposed Decisions on Claims of Holocaust Survivors Against 
Germany; (2) Issuance of Individual Final Decisions on Claims of 
Holocaust Survivors Against Germany.


[[Page 112]]


Status: Closed.

    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, N.W., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or 
advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be 
directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement 
Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. 
Telephone: (202) 616-6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 29, 1997.
Judith H. Lock,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-34229 Filed 12-30-97; 2:49 pm]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
#### Anibel K. TYRRELL, Appellant, v. Gordon W. TYRRELL, Appellee.

No. S-272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 26, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 1973.

Joe J. Harrell, Harrell, Wiltshire, Bozeman, Clark & Stone, Pensacola, for appellant.

David H. Levin, Levin, Warfield, Graff, Mabie & Rosenbloum, Pensacola, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment which dissolved the marriage between the parties upon the ground that the marriage wa9 irretrievably broken and awarded child support payments and rehabilitative alimony.

In this appeal appellant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in finding that the marriage was irretrievably broken, in fixing the amount of child support payments and in awarding rehabilitative alimony for a period not to exceed eighteen months.

From the record before us, as well as the briefs and oral argument, it is apparent that the evidence proffered by the appellant, defendant below, was not only of acts done after the final separation of the parties, but, if admissible, would have substantiated the appellee’s contention and the trial court’s finding that the marriage was irretrievably broken. We think, and so hold, that the trial court’s judgment on conflicting evidence should not be disturbed on appeal. The trial court’s judgment is clothed with a presumption of correctness and we do not think the appellant has overcome this presumption. It is not the province of this Court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of facts in the absence of a clear showing of error.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

The respective petitions for attorneys’ fees are denied.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.