alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
         PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

     Pursuant to section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Robert
M. O'Connor, the Chief Financial Officer of Escalon Medical Corp. (the
"Registrant"), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Registrant's Form 10-KSB Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
          June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Exchange Act; and

     2.   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


Date: September 28, 2006                /s/ Robert M. O'Connor
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert M. O'Connor
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     A signed copy of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be
furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANTS' QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 27,
2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-27-2000
<CASH>                                          23,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,345
<INVENTORY>                                    197,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               605,835
<PP&E>                                       1,368,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                 571,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,997,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          440,113
<BONDS>                                        764,430
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,375
<OTHER-SE>                                     627,787
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,997,042
<SALES>                                      3,045,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,045,186
<CGS>                                        2,333,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,333,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               542,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,975
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,022
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.05


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Kyle Dean Kuykendall v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-18-00930-CR

Trial court case number: B15-684

Trial court: 198th District Court of Kerr County1

Without agreed recommendations from the State, appellant, Kyle Dean 

Kuykendall, pleaded guilty to the felony offenses of failure to appear. The trial court 

found appellant guilty, assessed his punishment at confinement for ten years, and 

certified that appellant has the right to appeal. A clerk’s record was filed on September 

24, 2018; and supplemental clerk’s records were filed on October 2, 2018, and November 

28, 2018. A reporter’s record was filed on October 12, 2018.

Accordingly, appellant’s brief is due to be filed in this appeal no later than 30 

days from the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Russell Lloyd_______

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __December 4, 2018____________________

 

1 Pursuant to its docket equalization authority, the Supreme Court of Texas transferred the 

appeal to this Court from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas. See Misc. 

Docket No. 18-9130 (Tex. Sept. 26, 2018); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West 2015) (authorizing transfer of cases).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Membership on the Executive Resources Board

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Appointment to the Executive Resources Board for the Senior 
Executive Service.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced the 
following appointments to the NRC Executive Resources Board. The 
Executive Resources Board is responsible for providing institutional 
continuity in executive personnel management by overseeing NRC's Senior 
Executive Service (SES) and Senior Level System (SLS) succession 
planning, merit staffing, and position management activities.

Appointees

L. Joseph Callan, Executive Director for Operations, Chair
Karen D. Cyr, General Counsel
Anthony J. Galante, Chief Information Officer
Jesse L. Funches, Chief Financial Officer
Hugh L. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory 
Programs
Ashok C. Thadani, Acting Deputy Executive Director for Regulatory 
Effectiveness
Patricia G. Norry, Deputy Executive Director for Management Services
Samuel J. Collins, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Carl J. Paperiello, Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and 
Safeguards
Malcolm R. Knapp, Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Regulatory 
Research
Timothy T. Martin, Director, Office for the Analysis and Evaluation of 
Operational Data
Edward L. Halman, Director, Office of Administration
Paul E. Bird, Director, Office of Human Resources
Irene P. Little, Director, Office of Small Business and Civil Rights
John C. Hoyle, Secretary of the Commission
Hubert J. Miller, Regional Administrator, Region I
Luis A. Reyes, Regional Administrator, Region II
A. Bill Beach, Regional Administrator, Region III
    Ellis W. Merschoff, Regional Administrator, Region IV

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 18, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn J. Swanson, Secretary, 
Executive Resources Board, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 
Washington, D.C. 20555 (301) 415-7530.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day of December, 1997.

    For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Paul E. Bird,
Director, Office of Human Resources.
[FR Doc. 97-34075 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129012 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129012 COA: 252591 Wayne CC: 03-004736-01 JEREMY CONN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
#### Severiano JORGE and Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S. A., Appellants, v. The ANTONIO COMPANY, a Florida corporation, and Standard Cigar Company, a Florida corporation, and the Republic of Cuba, Appellees.

No. 3048.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

July 23, 1969.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,568
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                       136
<INVENTORY>                                     15,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,986
<PP&E>                                          25,127
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,036
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,738
<SALES>                                         40,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,009
<CGS>                                           29,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    373
<INCOME-TAX>                                       169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,400
<INVENTORY>                                     46,296
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,272
<PP&E>                                          53,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,879
<BONDS>                                          3,920
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,785
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,664
<SALES>                                        198,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           77,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,654
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,939
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,163
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,163
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Ramon David W., Jr., and Others, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Ramon David W., Appellant; Children’s Aid Society, Respondent.

[736 NYS2d 227]

Appeals from orders of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Cira Martinez, J.), entered on or about April 6, 1999, which, inter alia, upon respondent-appellant father’s default, found that appellant had permanently neglected the subject children and terminated his parental rights with respect to said children, committing custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services of the City of New York for purposes of adoption, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The orders from, which appellant purports to appeal were entered upon his default and accordingly are not appealable by him *(see,*CPLR 5511; *Matter of Ebony Monique A.,*265 AD2d 171), and while appellant argues that the denial of his motion to vacate his default constituted error, the challenged denial of vacatur was never reduced to an appealable order and thus is not properly before us *(see,*CPLR 5512 [a]; *Matter of Juan Alejandro R.,*221 AD2d 183). Were the challenged denial of vacatur reviewable, we would find no basis for disturbing it. Contrary to appellant’s contention, his right to be present at the fact-finding and dispositional hearings was not absolute *(see, Matter of Raymond Dean L.,*109 AD2d 87) and his presence was properly dispensed with since his failures to appear at these hearings were only the latest of numerous absences by him at appointments and hearings scheduled in connection with these neglect proceedings, the long pendency of which has not been in the children’s interest *(see, Matter of James Carton K.,*245 AD2d 374, *lv denied*91 NY2d 809). Nor would we find that Family Court’s denial of vacatur constituted an improper exercise of discretion. Appellant made no showing of a reasonable excuse for his default in appearing at the hearings and evidently has no meritorious defense to the termination petition *(see, Matter of “Male” Jones,*128 AD2d 403). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Sullivan, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health (NIH)


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Meeting of the National 
Advisory Council on Aging

    Pursuant to Pub. L. 92-463, notice is hereby given of the meeting 
of the National Advisory Council on Aging, National Institute on Aging, 
Thursday, February 5, and Friday, February 6, 1998, to be held at the 
National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Conference Room F1 and 
2, Bethesda, Maryland. This meeting will be open to the public on 
Thursday, February 5, from 1:00 to 4:30 p.m. for a status report by the 
Director, NIA, and the Behavioral and Social Research Program and 
Intramural Research Program Reviews.
    The meeting will be open again on Friday, February 6, from 8:00 to 
10:00 a.m. for a report on the Working Group on Program, a report on 
the Council Task Force on Minority Aging and Highlights of Recent 
Research Findings. Attendance by the public will be limited to space 
available.
    In accordance with the provisions set forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 
552b(c)(6), Title 5, U.S.C. and sec. 10(d) of Pub. L. 92-463, the 
meeting of the Council will be closed to the public on Thursday, 
February 5, from 4:30 p.m. to recess for the review of the Intramural 
Research Program.
    The meeting will also be closed on Friday, February 6, from 10:00 
a.m. to adjournment for the discussion and evaluation of grant 
applications. These applications and the discussions could reveal 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as a patentable 
material and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    Ms. June McCann, Committee Management Officer for the National 
Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 
7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C218, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (301/496-
9322), will provide a summary of the meeting and a roster of committee 
members upon request.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should 
contact Ms. McCann at (301) 496-9322, in advance of the meeting.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: December 17, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-33490 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 23, 2019

NO. 03-17-00764-CR

Chauncy Jarrell Williams, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER, AND SMITH 

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
p.1 

OAR Box 1778 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

268) IV-C-14 

Docket Number: 

A-90-06 

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:04 AM Sheet 268 of 276 
TEL: 202-252-0451 

Jan 27,92 3:52 No.008 P.02 

1 

.HQ*nPQPS A -qO- ^ (JAS? PS 

^

9

S * 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

**t m&& 

DEC I 3 jqaj 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

FROM: William G. Rosenbefg^^i^W^--^—' 

Assistant Administrator ^&~-* 

for Air and Radiation " 

TO: Linda Stuntz 

Deputy Under Secretary 

Policy, Planning, and Analysis 

U.S. Department of Energy 

You have asked for an outline of what major changes EPA is 

making in the WEPCO regulatory package. As you know, EPA is 

currently in the process of evaluating the comments received during 

the public comment period. Our preliminary review of the comments 

received so far has identified some specific issues 1 would like to 

bring to your attention. There may also be additional issues that 

are identified during the comment period that will be reflected in 

our draft final rule, but I have endeavored to mention all of the 

significant issues we have identified to date. 

Pending a complete review of all comments received, EPA 

expects to make very few changes to the proposed rule and intends 

to propose a final rule which is consistent with the 

Administration's WEPCO policy. Of course, the public comment 

period has not closed and EPA cannot make any firm decisions on the 

exact terms of the final rule until all comments have been received 

and reviewed. 

Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the proposed rule is 

EPA's proposal to adopt a presumption that best available control 

technology (BACT) for emissions of NOx from existing coal-fired 

electric utility steam generating units would be the technology 

required under section 407 of the Clean Air Act. Significant 

negative comment on this issue was received claiming that such a 

presumption is illegal and conflicts with the statutory requirement 

that BACT be a case-by-case decision. Consequently, EPA is 

considering deleting the presumption in the final rule 

There are two other aspects of the rulemaking that, 

based on EPA's initial review of comments, will require additional 

clarification. In general, the changes will be consistent with the 

testimony of EPA and DOE at the July 22 hearing. Specifically, EPA 

is considering clarifying the degree to which a utility must 
P.3 

-

l

 -,.-r~> TEL: 9OM-252-0451 

document the basis for its exclusion of demand - growth from its 

projection of increased capacity utilization. In addition, the 

final ruie may discuss mechanisms necessary to ensure the accuracy 

and enforceability of the factors relied on in making applicability 

determinations. 

We remain committed to sending the draft final rule to OMB by 

January 17. I hope that the above information helps you in 

preparing for that upcoming review process. Please give me a call 

if we can be of further assistance.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner 

v.

FRANK C. ARCURI,

Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2745 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 147 DB 2019

Attorney Registration 21317

(York County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6

th day of October, 2020, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Frank C. Arcuri is suspended from the Bar of 

this Commonwealth for one year and one day, and he shall comply with all the provisions 

of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to 

Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
^
                          	 Diamond Hill
                                 ------------
                                 Investments


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
					Investor Contact:
					James F. Laird-Chief Financial Officer
					614-255-3353 (jlaird@diamond-hill.com)

DIAMOND HILL INVESTMENT GROUP, INC.
ANNOUNCES SPECIAL DIVIDEND

	Columbus, Ohio - September 17, 2010 - Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.
(NASDAQ:DHIL) today announced that its board of directors has approved a $13.00
per share cash dividend to shareholders of record on December 1, 2010 payable
December 15, 2010.

Ric Dillon, president and co-chief investment officer, stated, "We are very
pleased to be paying a special dividend of $13 per share in December, following
$10 per share dividends paid in 2008 and 2009.  With the combined payments, the
company will have returned to shareholders over $85 million in total, tangible
evidence of the success of this venture that began just over 10 years ago.
These shareholder-friendly actions demonstrate most clearly that the board of
directors and management of the company see our duty to shareholders as second
only to our fiduciary duty to our clients."


About Diamond Hill:
Diamond Hill provides investment management services to institutions and
financial intermediaries seeking to preserve and build capital. The firm
currently manages mutual funds, separate accounts and private investment
funds.  For more information on Diamond Hill, visit www.diamond-hill.com.


					###

            325 John H. McConnell Blvd, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43215
                         614-255-3333  fax 614-255-3363
#### Alphonso DOWDELL, Appellant, v. CITY OF PERRY, a Florida municipal corporation, and Travelers Insurance Company, a Connecticut corporation, Appellees.

No. O-236.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 30, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.