alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORIGINAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES

In the Matter of

)

)

)

)

)

)

Docket No. 9327

POL YlORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Respondent.

ORDER MEMORIALIZING BENCH RULING ADMITTING PX 803

On June 11,2009, Respondent submitted a motion to exclude use ofPX 803 which had

been offered by Complaint Counsel at the final prehearing conference. For reasons stated on the

record in open court, Respondent's motion was denied and PX 803 was admitted. (Hearing

transcript, June 12,2009, pp. 5462-66).

ORDERED:

D. Michael Cha ell

~/V~

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Date: June 23,2009
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3609]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
[TA-W-32,611]


J.M. Huber Corporation, Oil and Gas Division, Houston, TX; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273) the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to 
Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on August 21, 1996, applicable 
to all workers of J.M. Huber Corporation, Oil and Gas Division located 
in Houston, Texas. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
September 13, 1996 (61 FR 48504).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New findings show that 
the Department incorrectly set the impact date at July 26, 1995. The 
workers at the subject firm were covered under an earlier 
certification, TA-W-29,330, which expired March 9, 1996. The Department 
is amending the current certification for workers of J.M. Huber 
Corporation, Oil and Gas Division to set the impact date at March 9, 
1996.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-32,611 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of J.M. Huber Corporation, Oil and Gas Division, 
Houston, Texas who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after March 9, 1996 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, D.C. this 5th day of February 1997.
Russell T. Kile,
Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment Services, Office of Trade 
Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 97-3609 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-M
Exhibit13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report ofCompañia de Telecomunicaciones de Chile S.A. (the"Company") on Form  20-F for the periodending December  31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Julio Covarrubias, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company certify that to the best of ourknowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date: June 24, 2005

|  | By:/s/ JulioCovarrubias |
|--|-------------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | Name:Julio Covarrubias Title: Chief FinancialOfficer |
|--|------------------------------------------------------|

----
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (No. 333-59572, 333-76542 and 333-87518) and Forms S-8
(No. 333-82755, 333-73170, 333-90400, 333-106082 and 333-122021)
of Cardiogenesis Corporation of our report dated
March 16, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Orange County, California
March 31, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart Q During 
the Week Ending February 7, 1997

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
Q of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 
CFR 302.1701 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming 
Applications, or Motions to modify Scope are set forth below for each 
application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-95-258.
    Date filed: February 7, 1997.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 7, 1997.
    Description: Application of Lynden Air Cargo, LLC., pursuant to 49 
U.S.C. Section 41109, and Subpart Q of the Regulations, requests the 
removal of a restriction to the certificate of public convenience and 
necessity that limits the size of aircraft operated by Lynden Air 
Cargo.
Paulette V. Twine,
Chief, Documentary Services.
[FR Doc. 97-3667 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING MEETING:

National Science Foundation
National Science Board

DATE AND TIME:

February 20, 1997, 3:45 p.m., Executive Closed Session
February 20, 1997, 4:00 p.m., Open Session
February 21, 1997, 8:20 a.m., Open Session

PLACE: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 1235, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.

STATUS: 

Part of this meeting will be open to the public.
Part of this meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Thursday, February 20, 1997
Executive Closed Session (3:45 p.m.-4:00 p.m.)

--Minutes, November 1996 Meetings
--Personnel

Thursday, February 20, 1997
Open Session (4:00 p.m.-6:30 p.m.)

--Discussion Item: Mechanisms for Setting Priorities in Science & 
Engineering (Guests: Dr. Frank Press; Dr. Ed David)

Friday, February 21, 1997
Open Session (8:20 a.m.-9:15 a.m.)

--Minutes, November 1996 Meeting
--Closed Session Agenda Items--March 1997 Meeting
--Chairman's Report
--Director's Report
--Program Approval: The Science and Technology Centers Program
--Reports from Committees
--Other Business
--Adjourn

Marta Cehelsky,
Executive Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3644 Filed 2-10-97; 2:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Order entered August 30, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00633-CV

WASH TECHNOLOGIES OF AMERICA CORPORATION AND 

JON K. BANGASH, APPELLANTS

V.

JOHN T. PAPPAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-16090

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Stephanie S. Moses’ August 17, 2016 request to extend time 

to file the reporter’s record and ORDER the reporter’s record filed no later than September 29, 

2016. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of O'Charley's Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 12, 2004 (the "Report"), I, A. Chad Fitzhugh, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ A. Chad Fitzhugh
---------------------------------------
A. Chad Fitzhugh
Chief Financial Officer
March 11, 2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                       % OF VOTING
                                                                                                       SECURITIES
                                                                                   JURISDICTION       OWNED BY ITS
                                                                                        OF              IMMEDIATE
     NAME OF CORPORATION                                                          INCORPORATION          PARENT
------------------------                                                      ------------------     ---------------
<S>                                                                           <C>                     <C>
Transatlantic Reinsurance Company...........................................  New York, U.S.A.              100%
  Putnam Reinsurance Company................................................  New York, U.S.A.              100%*
  Trans Re Zurich...........................................................  Zurich, Switzerland           100%*
</TABLE>

------------------------

* The common stock is owned 100 percent by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company.
FTC Form 232 (rev 7/11)

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20580

CASE NAME FILE/DOCKET NUMBER

Pursuant to Section 4.1 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, I (we) am (are) entering in the above 

proceeding the appearance of

□ counsel supporting the complaint (Complete Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for the respondent (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

□ counsel or representative for a third party (Complete Items 1, 2, 4, and 5 below)

1. COUNSEL OR REPRESENTATIVE 2. RESPONDENT(S) OR THIRD PARTY(IES)

Include the name, address, email address, and telephone 

number of each counsel or representative entering an 

appearance in the above proceeding,

Include the address and telephone numbers of all persons, 

partnerships, corporations, or associations on whose behalf 

this Notice of Appearance is being filed.

3. ASSOCIATE/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR

4. SIGNATURE OF SENIOR COUNSEL 5. DATE SIGNED

Return this form to: Federal Trade Commission

Room H-113

600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20580

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

CURTIS CROWTHER

 ccrowther@ycst.com

YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT & TAYLOR, LLP

1000 N. KING STREET

WILMINGTON, DE 19801

Phone Number: 302-571-6755

Fax Number: 302-576-3445

Ardagh Group S.A., et al. 12/2/2013

PIRAMAL GLASS - USA, INC.

PIRAMAL GLASS - USA, INC.

401 Route 73 North Bldg. #10, Suite 202

Lake Center Executive Park

Marlton, NJ 08053

Phone Number: 856-293-6400

Fax Number: 856-293-6401

D09356 (CURTIS J. CROWTHER)

12 02 2013
Order entered January 15, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01015-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

TINA TEAGUE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA17-47049-M

ORDER

This appeal is REINSTATED.

On October 10, 2019, the Court abated this appeal to allow the trial court to make 

findings of fact and conclusions of law and to order the reporter’s record supplemented with 

missing exhibits. The trial court’s written findings and the supplemental reporter’s record have 

been filed.

The State’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### CAUSEWAY MARINA, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Perry MANDEL, Appellee.

No. 72-482.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 17, 1973.

*72Smathers & Thompson and Christian D. Keedy, Miami, for appellants.

Grover, Weinstein & Stauber, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellants seek review of the lower court’s judgment awarding plaintiff-appellee $3,750 in damages.

Plaintiff-appellee stored his boat at appellant Causeway Marina, Inc. The boats at the marina are stored in various slots and stacked three high. They are moved on and off the racks by a forklift which is operated by the appellant marina and maintained by appellant W. E. Johnson Company. While a boat was being stacked the forklift failed when a hydraulic hose burst. As a result the boat fell and damaged appellee’s boat on the lower rack along with a boat on the middle rack. Several days later appellee, Mr. Mandel, arrived at the marina and discovered his boat was damaged. About two months thereafter, appellee signed an authorization to allow the marina to repair the boat. Appellant marina would not release the boat until appellee paid the repair bill and storage costs incurred subsequent to the accident. About 10 months after the accident Mandel finally paid the costs in full. Appellee filed suit to recover damages resulting from the physical damage to his boat and loss of its use. The jury returned a verdict of $5,000. The court ordered and appellee accepted a remittitur of $1,250. Appellants’ motion for new trial was denied. The court then entered a judgment of $3,750 plus costs in favor of appellee. This appeal followed.

Defendant-appellants allege it was error for the trial court to enter final judgment for the plaintiff.

The jury acted within its province on conflicting testimony and eviden-tiary inferences, and we cannot disturb its finding of negligence unless the trial proceedings reveal judicial error so prejudicial to a fair trial as to justify reversal. See 2 Fla.Jur. Appeals § 345 (1963) and cases cited therein. The proceedings do not reveal such error. Further, it is not the function of this court to substitute its judgment for interpretation of the facts for that of the jury. Holland Paving Company v. Dann, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 849; Food Fair Stores of Fla., Inc. v. Vallarelli, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 161.

In addition, the record reflects that the hydraulic hose, which apparently rup*73tured or leaked and was the proximate cause of the accident, had been discarded and, thus, was never available to appellee for inspection. We note also th^t the forklift was under the exclusive coittrol of the appellants. In light of the foregoing facts, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur undoubtedly is applicable to the case at bar. See 23 Fla.Jur. Negligence §§ 115, 116 (1959).

We have considered appellants’ remaining points on appeal and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed must be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T NI COLAS C ASTANEDA RODRI GU EZ ; e t a l., P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70502 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 353- 245

A 096- 353- 246 A 096- 353- 247 A 096- 353- 248 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. N i c ol a s C a s t ane daR odr i gue z , A gus t i naA l var a do A vi l a , M art i n C a s t ane da A l var a do, and M ar i ade l R os ar i o C a s t ane daA l var a do, na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M exi co, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d e n y i n g th e i rmo t i o n t o r e o p e n an dr e i s s u e . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. 

# FI LED JU N 21 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70502 2 § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Soc opG o n z a lezv . I

NS , 272 F . 3d 1176, 1187 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( e n banc ) , and w e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e o p e n an dr e is s u e o n th e g r o u n dth a t it w a s u n tim e ly , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), an dp e titio n e r s d idn o t d e m o n s tr a te th e du e d ilig e n c e r e q u ir e dto o b ta in e q u itab le to llin g o f th e f ilin g d e a d lin e , se e Socop -G on zalez , 27 2 F . 3d at11 93 (t ol l i ng appl i es w h e r e “d e s p ite a ll du e d ilig e n c e , th e p artyin v o k in g e q u itab le to llin g is u n ab le to obt a i n vi t a l i nf

orm a t i on be ar i ng on the e xi s t e nc e of the c l a i m ” a s ar e s ul tof c ir c u m s tan c e s b e y o n dh is c o n tr o l) ( a lte r a tio n s an dc ita tio n o m itte d ) . I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e ne e d nota ddr e s s pe t i t i one r s ’ r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

3-31-2008

Daley v. Secretary Homeland

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-4266

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Daley v. Secretary Homeland" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1356.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1356
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-4266

 

DEON EARL DALEY,

 Appellant

 v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY;

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT;

THOMAS V. DURAN

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 07-cv-01443)

District Judge: Honorable Malcolm Muir

 

Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

MARCH 19, 2008

Before: SLOVITER, BARRY AND GREENBERG, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

(Opinion filed March 31, 2008)

 

OPINION

 

PER CURIAM

Deon Earl Daley appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his petition

filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The procedural history of this case and the details of
 On January 8, 2008, this Court denied Daley’s petition for review of his removal 1

order. See Daley v. Attorney Gen., No. 07-3295, 2008 WL 73688 (3d Cir. Jan. 8, 2008). 

Thus, the District Court’s decision to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, rather than transfer

the matter to this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1631, was entirely appropriate.

2

Daley’s claims are well known to the parties, set forth in the District Court’s thorough

order, and need not be discussed at length. Daley, a citizen of Jamaica, filed a § 2241

petition challenging his removal order and his continued detention. The District Court

dismissed the petition. Daley filed a timely notice of appeal.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and exercise plenary review over the

District Court’s legal conclusions. Cradle v. U.S. ex rel. Miner, 290 F.3d 536, 538 (3d

Cir. 2002). We agree with the District Court that it did not have jurisdiction over Daley’s

challenge to his removal order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5). As for Daley’s challenge to 1

his detention, he was still within the presumptively reasonable six-month post-removal

period at the time of the District Court’s order. See Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 701

(2001).

For the above reasons, as well as those set forth by the District Court, we will

affirm the District Court’s October 29, 2007 order. Daley’s motion to dismiss is denied.
No. D-2185.

#### In re Disbarment of Kozel.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 530 U. S. 1289.]
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 2nd QUARTER 2021*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter -615.56

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

3-Year Note 4/15 58.00 0.00

10-Year Note (r) 4/15 38.00 0.00

30-Year Bond (r) 4/15 24.00 0.00 61.05 58.95

20-Year Bond (r) 4/30 24.00 0.00

5-Year TIPS 4/30 18.00 1.00

2-Year Note 4/30 60.00 0.00

2-Year FRN 4/30 28.00 0.00

5-Year Note 4/30 61.00 0.00

7-Year Note 4/30 62.00 0.00 122.37 130.63

3-Year Note 5/17 58.00 0.00

10-Year Note 5/17 41.00 0.00

30-Year Bond 5/17 27.00 0.00 47.74 78.26

10-Year TIPS (r) 5/28 13.00 1.00

2-Year FRN (r) 5/28 26.00 0.00 0.00 39.00

20-Year Bond 6/1 27.00 0.00

2-Year Note 6/1 60.00 0.00

5-Year Note 6/1 61.00 0.00

7-Year Note 6/1 62.00 0.00 75.75 134.25

3-Year Note 6/15 58.00 0.00

10-Year Note (r) 6/15 38.00 0.00

30-Year Bond (r) 6/15 24.00 0.00 20.97 99.03

2-Year FRN (r) 6/25 26.00 0.00 0.00 26.00

20-Year Bond (r) 6/30 24.00 0.00

5-Year TIPS (r) 6/30 16.00 1.00

2-Year Note 6/30 60.00 0.00

5-Year Note 6/30 61.00 0.00

7-Year Note 6/30 62.00 0.00 78.55 144.45

1117.00 406.44 710.56

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 95

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 01/29/2021 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
#### Walter WOODY and Vivian Woody, his wife, For the Use and Benefit of Morrison Assurance Company, Inc., Appellants, v. NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. R-162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1973.

Herman Ulmer, Jr., and Gary B. Tullís, of Ulmer, Murchison, Ashby & Ball, Jacksonville, for appellants.

William M. Howell and Edna L. Caruso, of Howell, Kirby, Montgomery, D’Aiuto, Dean & Hallowes, Jacksonville, Mercury N. Kavouklis, Joseph M. Ripley, Jr., and Alvin C. Thompson, Jr., Fernandina Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K„ and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.