alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6765-6766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3548]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM97-8-23-000]


Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 5, 1997, Eastern Shore Natural Gas 
Company (ESNG) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
First Revised Volume No. 1, certain revised tariff sheets in the above 
captioned docket, with a

[[Page 6766]]

proposed effective date of February 1, 1997.
    ESNG states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track rate 
changes attributable to storage service purchased from Columbia Gas 
Transmission Corporation (Columbia) under Columbia's Rate Schedules SST 
and FSS the costs of which are included in the rates and charges 
payable under ESNG's Rate Schedules CWS and CFSS effective February 1, 
1997. This tracking filing is being filed pursuant to Section 24 of the 
General Terms and Conditions of ESNG's FERC Gas Tariff to reflect 
changes in ESNG's jurisdictional rates.
    ESNG states that copies of the filing have been served upon its 
jurisdictional customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rule 211 and Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
practice and Procedure (18 CFR Section 385.211 and Section 385.214). 
All such motions or protests must be filed in accordance with Section 
154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be considered by 
the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but 
will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. 
Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available 
for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3548 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Willie Dewey LONG, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Dvn. of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 72-932.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 9, 1972.

Habeas corpus denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 17, 2016

p1110 

# Order

Clerk November 17, 2016

153541

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153541

COA: 331240

Wayne CC: 13

- 003211

- FC

ANDREW BERNARD KEITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of

People v Horton (Docket No. 150815) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to

appeal, we ORDER that the applica tion be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in

that case.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

Office of the Secretary

May 21, 2001

John F. Dickey, Esq.

E.1. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Barley Mill Plaza 25/2218

P.O. Box 80025

Wilmington, DE 19880-0025

Re: Petition of DuPont for a new generic fiber name and definition under the
Rules and Regulations Under the Textile Fiber Products Identification Act,
16 CFR. Part 303.

Dear Mr. Dickey:

Pursuant to Rule 8 of the Rules and Regulations Under the Textile Fiber Products
Identification Act, 16 C.F.R. § 303.8, the Commission has assigned the designation “DP 0002” to
DuPont's clastic fiber for temporary use until a final determination can be made as to the merits
of the application.

The assignment of this temporary designation should not be construed as indicating that
the Commission will either grant or deny the application or that the Commission has determined

the application to be complete.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark
Secretary
* The Hon. Jerome Farris, United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 04a0161n.06 Filed: December 16, 2004 No. 03-4380 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL BREGANT and LORENA WILKINS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. VICTOR VIGLUICCI, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Before: DAUGHTREY, COOK, and FARRIS, * Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs, Michael Bregant and Lorena Wilkins, appeal the district court’s order granti ng summary judgment to the defendant s, who are officers in the Ravenna (Ohio) Police Department, the City ofRavenna, and the county prosecutor. The complaint filed by the plaintiffs, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, c harged that on September 10, 2000, Ravenna police officers had used excessi ve force in arresting Bregant and had seized property belonging to Wilkins without pr obable cause; that the county prosecutor had advised the officers not to return Wilk ins’s property on an unspecified date; and that the City of Ravenna had “failed to institute and/or im plement any type of overview for the misconduct of its officers involving acts of bruta lity or excessive force,” all in violation of the plaintiffs’ civil rights.No. 03-4380

- 2 - The complaint was filed on September 13, 2002, and resulted in motions to dismiss by the defendants, alleging that t he it was not timely filed underOhio’s two-year statute of limitations, Ohio Revised Code § 2305.10. Plai ntiff Bregant responded by claiming that the statute was tolled from Sept ember 10, 2000, at least thr ough September 13, 2000, during which period he was hospitalized for viral en cephalitis and meningitis, conditions that rendered him “of unsound mind.” Wilkins claimed that she did not know that her property had been seized until Bregant was di scharged from the hospital on September 14, 2000, and that she had demanded and was re fused the return of her property on September 19, 2000, thus tolling the statute dur ing that additional period of ti me. The district court found that the explanations given byboth plaintiffs were legallyinadequate to support application of tolling and dismissed the complaint.
Having studied the record on appeal and t he briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district cour t erred in dismissing the co mplaint. Because the reasons why judgment should be entered for the def endants have been fully articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed opi nion by this court would be duplicative and would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order dated September 26, 2003.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00154-CV

In the Interest of K.R.A., a child §

§

§

§

From the 324th District Court

of Tarrant County (324-455189-09)

March 6, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant B.M.A. shall pay all costs of this appeal, 

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bob McCoy__________________

 Justice Bob McCoy
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
                Under Section 805 of the Business Corporation Law
                 ----------------------------------------------

                  It is hereby certified that:

     FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is DEL GLOBAL  TECHNOLOGIES  CORP. (the
"Corporation").

     SECOND:  The certificate of  incorporation  of the Corporation was filed by
the  Department  of  State  on  October  26,  1954.  The name  under  which  the
Corporation was formed is Del Electronics Corp.

     THIRD: The amendment of the certificate of incorporation of the Corporation
effected by this certificate of amendment is as follows:

               to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock, $.10
               par value, from ten million (10,000,000) shares to twenty million
               (20,000,000) shares, $.10 par value.

     FOURTH:  To accomplish the foregoing  amendment,  paragraph  "Third" of the
certificate  of  incorporation  of the  Corporation is hereby amended to read as
follows:

     THIRD:  the  aggregate  number of shares which the  Corporation  shall have
authority to issue is Twenty Million  (20,000,000)  shares of common stock, $.10
par value."

     FIFTH:  The foregoing  amendment of the certificate of incorporation of the
Corporation  was  authorized  by the  Board of  Directors  and  followed  by the
majority vote of the holders of all of the outstanding shares of the Corporation
entitled to vote on such amendment of the certificate of incorporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  we have hereunto signed this certificate this 13th day
of February,  1997, and affirmed that the statements  made herein are true under
penalties of perjury.


/S/LEONARD TRUGMAN
------------------
Leonard A. Trugman, President

/S/MICHAEL TABER
----------------
Michael Taber, Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Manufacturer of Controlled Substances, Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Section 1301.43(a) of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on December 24, 1996, MD 
Pharmaceutical, Inc., 3501 West Garry Avenue, Santa Ana, California 
92704, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the 
basic classes of controlled substances listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methylphenidate (1724).....................  II                         
Diphenoxylate (9170).......................  II                         
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances to 
make finished dosage forms for distribution to its customers.
    Any other such applicant and any person who is presently registered 
with DEA to manufacture such substances may file comments or objections 
to the issuance of the above application.
    Any such comments or objections may be addressed, in quintuplicate, 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative 
(CCR), and must be filed no later than April 14, 1997.


    Dated: January 27, 1997.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-3642 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        6495
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                80432
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (2734)
<INVENTORY>                                  58273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            157466
<PP&E>                                      185077
<DEPRECIATION>                              (75471)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              316029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        74449
<BONDS>                                     119777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                  125003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                316029
<SALES>                                     476355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            476355
<CGS>                                       367905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               367905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               964
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           36475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (5078)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           4218
<DISCONTINUED>                                5550
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  9768
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
255 La. 165

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Arthur HOLLAND v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50322.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 16, 1970.

In re: Arthur Holland applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari and mandamus.

Writ refused. Showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original supervisory jurisdiction.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4272]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[CFDA NO.: 84.031G]


Endowment Challenge Grant Program; Withdrawal of Closing Date 
Notice Inviting Applications for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 1997

SUMMARY: On August 20, 1996 a notice was published in the Federal 
Register (61 FR 43128) inviting applications for new awards under the 
Endowment Challenge Grant Program for FY 1997. Since the Congress did 
not appropriate FY 1997 funds for the Endowment Challenge Grant 
Program, the Department of Education withdraws this notice inviting 
applications for new awards for FY 1997 under this program. The 
Department will not make new awards in FY 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. William J. Carter, U.S. Department 
of Education, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Portals Building, Suite 
CY-80, Washington, D.C. 20202-5337. Telephone: (202) 708-8866. Internet 
address: William__C<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e48596908196a48180ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c4d5e58495e6c4948024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>; FAX: (202) 401-7532. Individuals who 
use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday.

    Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1065.

    Dated: February 12, 1997.
David A. Longanecker,
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 97-4272 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Horace M. BARRETT, d/b/a Barrett & Fields Funeral Home, Appellant, v. William TRIPP and Damon White, Appellees.

No. 71-65.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 1, 1971.

Appeal quashed.
EX-10.17



 EXHIBIT 10.17 

 
 



 
 Notice of Grant 
 Babcock & Wilcox Long-Term Incentives 
 [Date] 

TO: [Name] 
 The Company is pleased to advise
that you have been granted long-term incentives as follows: 
  

			
	 Date of Grant:
	  	             
	 Performance Restricted Stock Units Granted:
	  	  

             

	 Restricted Stock Units Granted:
	  	             
	 Non Qualified Stock Options Granted:
	  	            @            

 By your signature below, you agree that these incentives are granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of
the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan of The Babcock & Wilcox Company (as amended and restated to date, the “Plan”), and the 2014 B&W Restricted Stock Units, Stock Options and Performance Restricted Stock Units Agreements, which
are attached to and made a part of this document. A copy of the Plan and the Prospectus relating to the stock issued under the Plan can be found at http://equityawardcenter.schwab.com under the “At a Glance/My Company Info” tab in
your Schwab account. The Plan and Prospectus are incorporated by reference and made a part of this document. If you would like to receive a copy of either the Plan or Prospectus, please contact
            at [telephone number] or [email]. 
 Please acknowledge
(1) your receipt and acceptance of this Notice of Grant and accompanying long-term incentives and (2) your agreement with the terms contained in the Grant Agreement governing such long-term incentives, by signing both this Notice and the
enclosed copy hereof and returning one such signed copy to The Babcock & Wilcox Company at The Harris Building, 13024 Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, NC 28277, Attention:
                and marked “Personal and Confidential.” Your long-term incentives will not be effective until you return a signed copy of this
Notice. Please do so no later than 30 days from the date of the Notice. 
  

									
	  
	  	 	Date:	  	  	 	  	
	 [Name]
# NEU Distribution Eligible Templ
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John Andrew FAUST.

No. 60232.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 28, 1977.

In re: John Andrew Faust applying for remedial writs.

Writ denied. There is no final judgment. Applicant has an adequate remedy by review in the event of conviction.
IIB 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 722 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 18, 2019 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To designate a mountain in the State of Utah as ‘‘Miracle 

Mountain’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 722 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Miracle Mountain Des3 ignation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds as follows: 

6 (1) On September 13, 2018, the Bald Mountain 

7 Fire burned nearly 20,000 acres of land in Utah. 

8 (2) Elk Ridge City, located in Utah County, 

9 was nearly the victim of this fire. 

10 (3) Suddenly, the fire halted its progression 

11 and, instead of burning into Elk Ridge City, stayed 

12 behind the mountain and spared the city. 

13 (4) Congress, in acknowledgment of this event, 

14 believes this mountain holds special significance to 

15 the residents of Elk Ridge City and surrounding 

16 communities. 

17 (5) The presently unnamed peak has been re18 ferred to as ‘‘Miracle Mountain’’ by many residents 

19 since the fire that nearly went into Elk Ridge City. 

20 SEC. 3. MIRACLE MOUNTAIN. 

21 (a) DESIGNATION.—The mountain in the State of 

22 Utah, located at 39° 59′ 02N, 111° 40′ 12W, shall be 

23 known and designated as ‘‘Miracle Mountain’’. 

24 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg25 ulation, document, record, or other paper of the United 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 722 RFS

1 States to the mountain described in subsection (a) shall 

2 be considered to be a reference to ‘‘Miracle Mountain’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 17, 

2019. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 3, 2021

NO. 03-21-00255-CV

D. H., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

CONCURRING OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the decree terminating appellant’s parental rights signed by the trial court

on May 21, 2021. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that 

there was no reversible error in the decree. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s decree

of termination. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
EX-10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 
 Power of Attorney 
 I, He Boquan, with the Identification Card
No. 442000601107545 and the address at No. 01-02, 29th Floor, Building A1, Zhong Hai Jin Yuan, Binjiang East Road 957, Guangzhou, being a shareholder of 50% of the equity (“My Equity”) of Shanghai iKang Guobin Group Co., Ltd., (with the former name
of “Shanghai Guobin Medical Holding Co., Ltd.”) hereby irrevocably authorize ShanghaiMed iKang, Inc. (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights with respect to My Equity within the term of this Power of Attorney: 

WFOE is hereby authorized to act on my behalf as my sole exclusive agent and attorney with respect to all matters concerning My Equity, including but not
limited to: 1) attending the shareholders’ meetings of Shanghai iKang Guobin Group Co., Ltd.; 2) exercising all the shareholder’s rights and shareholder’s voting right I am entitled to according to law and Articles of Association of
Shanghai iKang Guobin Group Co., Ltd., including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Equity in part or in whole; 3) receiving the dividend, bonus and any distribution attributable to the shareholder that I have
declared; and 4) designating and appointing, as my authorized representative, the legal representative (executive director), general manager and other senior management members of Shanghai iKang Guobin Group Co., Ltd.. 

WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to execute the Transfer Contract(s) stipulated in Exclusive Option Contract (to
which I am required to be a party) on my behalf, and to duly perform the Equity Pledge Contract and the Exclusive Option Contract to which I am a contracting party, both of which were executed concurrently with this Power of Attorney. The exercise
of these powers shall not impose any restrictions on this Power of Attorney. 
 All the actions conducted by WFOE in relation to My Equity shall
be deemed as my own actions, and all documents executed by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by myself. I hereby acknowledge those actions and documents. 
 WFOE is entitled to assign its rights regarding the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and without giving any prior notice to me or obtaining my consent. 

This Power of Attorney shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney, so long as I am a shareholder of
Shanghai iKang Guobin Group Co., Ltd. 







 During the term of this Power of Attorney, I hereby waive all the rights associated with My Equity, which
have been entrusted to WFOE through this Power of Attorney, and shall not exercise such rights by myself. 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ He Boquan

		 	He Boquan
		
	Date:	 	March 17th, 2008