alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,278
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                     11,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,515
<PP&E>                                          26,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,857
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,261
<SALES>                                         13,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,476
<CGS>                                            9,946
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (215)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (327)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7315 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7315

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the penalty for use 
                   of force, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2020

     Ms. Omar (for herself, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Thompson of 
 Mississippi, Ms. Norton, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, and Ms. 
Ocasio-Cortez) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to clarify the penalty for use 
                   of force, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Our Protesters Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW.

    Section 242 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``United States,'' and inserting ``United 
        States, including the use of force during a response to a 
        protest''; and
            (2) by striking ``, or may be sentenced to death''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**In connection with the Annual Report of PetSmart, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended February 3, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Philip L. Francis, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securitiesand Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: March 28, 2008   */s/ Philip L. Francis*  * *Philip L. Francis  Chairman of the Board of Directors andChief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18U.S.C. § 1350), has been provided to PetSmart, Inc. and will be retained by PetSmart, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of PetSmart, Inc. under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.
78
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 61]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent to Grant Exclusive Patent License; U.S. Drug 
Testing, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent 
to grant to U.S. Drug Testing, Inc., a revocable, nonassignable, 
exclusive license in the United States and certain foreign countries to 
practice the Government owned invention described in U.S. Patent No. 
5,183,740, entitled ``Flow Immunosensor Method and Apparatus,'' issued 
February 2, 1993, in the field of saliva based human diagnostics.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections, along with any supporting evidence, not later than 
March 3, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Naval 
Research, ONR 00CC, Ballston Tower One, 800 North Quincy Street, 
Arlington, Virginia 22217-5660.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. R. J. Erickson, Staff Patent Attorney, Office of Naval Research, 
ONR 00CC, Ballston Tower One, 800 North Quincy Street, Arlington, 
Virginia 22217-5660, telephone (703) 696-4001.

    Authority: 35 U. S. C. 207; 37 CFR Part 404; 32 CFR Part 746.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
Michael I. Quinn,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U. S. Navy, 
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-34201 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7253 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act to 

extend the authorization of appropriations for the Lead Exposure Registry, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. KILDEE (for himself, Mr. MOOLENAAR, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. UPTON, Mr. 

LEVIN of Michigan, Mr. HUIZENGA, Mrs. LAWRENCE, Mr. WALBERG, 

Ms. SLOTKIN, Ms. STEVENS, Mr. BERGMAN, and Ms. TLAIB) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the 

Nation Act to extend the authorization of appropriations 

for the Lead Exposure Registry, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flint Registry Reau5 thorization Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7253 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR LEAD 

2 EXPOSURE REGISTRY. 

3 Section 2203(d) of the Water Infrastructure Im4 provements for the Nation Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–21(d)) is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 

7 subparagraphs (A) and (B), and adjusting the mar8 gins appropriately; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘There’’ and inserting the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(1) FISCAL YEARS 2017 THROUGH 2021.— 

12 There’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(2) FISCAL YEARS 2022 THROUGH 2031.— 

15 There is authorized to be appropriated for the period 

16 of fiscal years 2022 through 2031 $50,000,000 to 

17 carry out subsection (b).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4223]



[[Page 7751]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[Docket 58-95]


Foreign-Trade Zone 35; Philadelphia, PA; Amended Application for 
Subzone; Tosco Corporation (Oil Refinery Complex); Delaware County, PA

    Notice is hereby given that the application of the Philadelphia 
Regional Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 35, requesting special-purpose 
subzone status for the oil refinery complex of Tosco Corporation 
(Tosco), in Delaware County, PA (Doc. 58-95, 60 FR 53164, 10/12/95) has 
been amended to reflect certain changes to the refinery's operations 
subsequent to its purchase by Tosco from BP Exploration & Oil Inc.
    Upon taking over the refinery on February 2, 1996, Tosco requested 
that the processing of the pending subzone application be put on hold 
until further notice. Tosco now has requested that the processing of 
the application, as amended, be resumed. It plans to restart refinery 
operations on May 1, 1997.
    The refinery (185,000 barrels per day, 360 employees) will be used 
to produce fuels and petrochemical feedstocks. Fuels produced include 
gasoline, jet fuel, distillates, residual fuels, and naphthas. 
Petrochemical feedstocks and refinery by-products may include methane, 
ethane, butane, propane, toluene, benzene, xylene, petroleum coke, 
asphalt and carbon black. LPG (liquified petroleum gas) recovery 
facilities and two 15,000 barrel tanks have been added enabling all the 
LPG produced in the refinery to be recovered and sold.
    The application remains otherwise unchanged.
    The comment period is reopened until March 24, 1997.
    Copies of the application and the amendment are available for 
public inspection at each of the following locations:

U.S. Department of Commerce, Export Assistance Center, Suite 1501, 615 
Chestnut St., Philadelphia, PA 19106.
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 
3716, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th & Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4223 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7398

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MUHAMMAD ABDUL RAHMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (7:08-cr-00126-D-1)

Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Muhammad Abdul Rahman, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Ethan A. Ontjes, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Muhammad Abdul Rahman seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012)

motion. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Rahman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Dear Messrs. Cal l ahan and Robinson :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing fro m your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015

− 3314 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the material listed below , however the material was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM)

.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov

. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information ), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process
y our request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/7/15 . I f we do not receive the information

, we will close the dock et without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

. Sincerely, /S/ Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2409 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2409

   To support security and law enforcement training and cooperation 
                 between the United States and Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2021

  Mr. Keller introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To support security and law enforcement training and cooperation 
                 between the United States and Israel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``U.S.-Israel Cooperation Expansion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) On May 9, 2018, the House Committee on Foreign Affairs 
        adopted an amendment stating that it was the policy of the 
        United States to support bilateral cooperation between United 
        States and Israeli law enforcement personnel.
            (2) The United States has a long history of cooperation 
        with Israel.
            (3) The sharing of distinct experiences can promote 
        security against terrorism, peaceful resolutions to community 
        disputes, and the protection of spaces for civil society.
            (4) Congress has supported bilateral cooperation with 
        Israel to combat the threat of illicit cross-border tunneling 
        and the associated trafficking in arms, persons, and militants 
        and to combat threats from unmanned aerial systems.
            (5) The United States supports law enforcement training, 
        cooperation, and education globally.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the United States supports the inclusion of Israel in 
        the International Law Enforcement Academy in Europe; and
            (2) the Secretary of State should support projects in the 
        Middle East through the International Narcotics Control and Law 
        Enforcement program.

SEC. 4. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States--
            (1) to support bilateral training between United States and 
        Israeli law enforcement personnel, for the purpose of sharing 
        of best practices relating to anti-terrorism, community 
        policing, and managing mass casualties; and
            (2) to continue to counter threats to United States and 
        Israeli security and embassy protection posed by illicit cross-
        border tunneling and unmanned aerial systems.
                                 <all>
```
#### HEMBREE NATIONAL CORPORATION et al., Appellant, v. ABEL SUPPLY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. R-212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 19, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 17, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000026285
<NAME>                        Curtice-Burns Foods, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                           5,334
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    148,219
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,280
<PP&E>                                         247,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 614,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,269
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   614,359
<SALES>                                        561,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,332
<CGS>                                          412,827
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  412,827
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,076
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,742
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        1,747
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Marcia KAPLAN, Appellant, v. Elliott KAPLAN, Appellee.

No. 72-653.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1973.

Michael A. Lipsky, Miami, for appellant.

Allen Kornblum, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered the record and briefs in this cause, oral argument having been waived by the parties, and have concluded that the chancellor did not abuse his discretion in the amount of his child support award to the appellant, and find that no reversible error has been demonstrated. *185McGarry v. McGarry, Fla.App.1971, 247 So.2d 13 and cases cited therein. Therefore, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3883]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD


Sunshine Act; Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, February 19, 1997.

PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, C Street 
entrance between 20th and 21st Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Proposed amendments to Regulation Y (Bank Holding Companies and 
Change in Bank Control) to eliminate unnecessary regulatory burden 
(proposed earlier for public comment; Docket No. R-0935).
2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

    Note: This meeting will be recorded for the benefit of those 
unable to attend. Cassettes will be available for listening in the 
Board's Freedom of Information Office, and copies may be ordered for 
$5 per cassette by calling (202) 452-3684 or by writing to: Freedom 
of Information Office, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System, Washington, D.C. 20551.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Mr. Joseph R. Coyne, Assistant to 
the Board; (202) 452-3204.

    Dated: February 12, 1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-3883 Filed 2-12-97; 11:30 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 05-1534

ANTONIO APONTE-TORRES ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 14, 2006 is

corrected as follows:

Starting at page 15, line 21, and going through page 16,

line 12, delete the following text:

notice of appeal refers only to the district court's

order of dismissal, entered February 14, 2005. It makes

no mention of the separate order staying discovery,

entered December 1, 2004. 

That is game, set, and match. By rule, a notice of

appeal must specify the particular order to which the

appeal is addressed. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B)

(mandating that a notice of appeal "designate the

judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed").

Failure to identify a given order undermines an

appellant's ability to dispute that order in the court of

appeals. See, e.g., Shelby v. Superformance Int'l, Inc.,

435 F.3d 42, 45 (1st Cir. 2006); Kotler v. Am. Tobacco

Co., 981 F.2d 7, 10-11 (1st Cir. 1992). The plaintiffs

offer no persuasive reason why the denominate-or-waive

rule should not be enforced in this instance.

We add, moreover, that even if this assignment of

error were preserved, it would fail. The plaintiffs' 

The resulting sentence should begin "The plaintiffs' attack"