alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### United States Environmental Protection Agency **Electronic Docket**  **Index for**  **[EPA -** **R09 -**  **OAR -**  **201 5**  **- 0542**  **] Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plan; California;**  **Feather River Air Quality Management District;**

**Stationary Source Permits August 2015**  **Section A** 

**– EP**  **A Rulemaking Documents Document**  **Number Document Name**  **Date** A.1 Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Revisions

to California State Implementation Plan; Feather River Air Quality Management District: Stationary Source Permits
. Rule 10.1

– NSR [PUBLICATION DATE OF RULEMAKING] A.2 Federal Register Notice of Direct Final Rulemaking for

Revisions to California State Implementation Plan; Feather River Air Quality Management District: Stationary Source Permits
. Rule 10.1

– NSR [PUBLICATION DAT E OF RULEMAKING] **Section B**

**– State Implementation Plan Revision Submittals**  **Document Number**  **Document Name Date**  B.1 SIP submittal letter from CARB 11/06/2014 B.2 Feather River AQMD Rule 10.1

– New Source Review Adopted 10/06/2014 B.3 FRAQMD, Staff Report, Rule 10.1

– New Source Review 08/22/2014 B.4 EPA Completeness Letter 12/18/2014 **Section C**

**– Referenced Federal Register Notices**  **Document Number**  **Document Name Date**  C.1 78 FR 58460 ; Revision of Air Quality Implementation Plan;

California; Placer County Air Pollution Control District and Feather River Air Quality Management District; Stationary Source Permits 09/24/2013
C.2 79 FR 72981; Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for

PM2.5; Yuba City
-Marysville; California 12/09/2014
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of NaturalNano, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Kathleen A. Browne,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.








\s\
      Kathleen A. Browne





Kathleen
      A. Browne


Chief
      Financial Officer


February
      15, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6971-6972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following freight forwarder licenses have been revoked pursuant to 
section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) and the 
regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of ocean 
freight forwarders, effective on the corresponding revocation dates 
shown below:

    License Number: 3679.
    Name: Alpha Cargo Services, Inc.
    Address: c/o Sonya Salkin, Malnik & Salkin, 1776 North Pine Island 
Road, Suite 216, Plantation, FL 33322.
    Date Revoked: December 19, 1996.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

    License Number: 170.
    Name: Cavalier Shipping Co., Inc.
    Address: 5445 Henneman Drive, 100 Trade Winds Center, Norfolk, VA 
23513.
    Date Revoked: January 15, 1997.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 3893.
    Name: Global Shipping and Trade Services, Inc.
    Address: 2000 South Yale Street, Santa Ana, CA 92704.
    Date Revoked: January 17, 1997.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.
    License Number: 3800.
    Name: Hidalgo, Inc.
    Address: 1427 Hudson Street, Kenner, Louisiana 70062.
    Date Revoked: December 18, 1996.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 2661.
    Name: Interfreight Shipping Corp.
    Address: c/o H and M Company, 700 Belville Turnpike, Carney, NJ 
07032.
    Date Revoked: December 14, 1996.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

    License Number: 3450.
    Name: Ki Suck Chae d/b/a Pioneer Express Line.
    Address: 15111 South Figueroa Street, Gardena, CA 90248.
    Date Revoked: January 12, 1997.

[[Page 6972]]

    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

    License Number: 3799.
    Name: Marco Forwarding International Co.
    Address: 5750 N.W. 32nd Court, Miami, FL 33142.
    Date Revoked: December 22, 1996.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

    License Number: 216.
    Name: Pafco Forwarders, Inc.
    Address: 157 N.E. 8th Street, Miami, FL 33132.
    Date Revoked: December 7, 1996.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid surety bond.

Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Director, Bureau of Tariffs, Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 97-3712 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<CIK>                                 0000863139
<NAME>              SEMPER RESOURCES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                                  <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                       Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                         Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<CASH>                                    16,046
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          16,046
<PP&E>                                     2,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         7,384,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    160,387
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0     
<PREFERRED>                              130,000
<COMMON>                                  25,258
<OTHER-SE>                            10,497,425
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           7,384,874
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            397,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (406,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (406,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (406,818)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.02)
                                    

</TABLE>
Exhibit
4.82


 


Summary
of the Private Instrument of Fiduciary Transfer of Real State Property, entered into on March 23, 2021, in connection with Fazenda
Chaparral and Fazenda Rio do Meio.


 


Parties:
Imobiliária Cajueiro Ltda. and Agrifirma Bahia Agropecuária Ltda. as the owners of the lands; ISEC Securitizadora
S.A, as beneficiaries; and Brasilagro Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas as intervening-consenting party.


 


Purpose: The
commitment to grant a Fiduciary Transfer of Real State Property of 16.533,1451 hectares of Fazenda Chaparral and 6.039,4144 hectares
of Fazenda Rio do Meio, which were given as collateral in order to secure the fulfillment of obligations under the agribusiness receivables
certificates (Certificados de Recebíveis do Agronegócio) issued in May 2021 in the aggregate amount of R$240,000,000.00.
The agribusiness receivables certificates will mature on April 12, 2028, subject to interest based on the broad consumer price index
(Índice de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo), or IPCA, plus 5.36% per year.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-20435

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EMILIO MEDRANO RENTERIA, also known as Ricardo Medrano, also 

known as Emilio Medrano, also known as Emilio Renteria Medrano,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-17-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Emilio Medrano 

Renteria has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medrano Renteria has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-20435 Document: 00513472124 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-20435

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-20435 Document: 00513472124 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34049]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Renegotiation Board Interest Rate; Prompt Payment Interest Rate; 
Contract Disputes Act

AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: For the period beginning January 1, 1998 and ending on June 
30, 1998 the prompt payment interest rate is 6.25% (6 1/4) per centum 
per annum.

ADDRESSES: Comments or inquiries may be mailed to Cynthia Winters, Team 
Leader, Debt Accounting Branch, Office of Public Debt Accounting, 
Bureau of the Public Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328. A 
copy of this Notice will be made available for downloading from the 
http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov.

DATES: This notice announces the interest rate applicable for the 
January 1, 1998 to June 30, 1998 period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Brown, Debt Accounting 
Branch Manager, Office of Public Debt Accounting, Bureau of the Public 
Debt, Parkersburg, West Virginia, 26106-1328, (304) 480-5171, Cynthia 
Winters, Team Leader, Debt Accounting Branch, Office of Public Debt 
Accounting, Bureau of the Public Debt, (304) 480-5174, or Elizabeth S. 
Gracia, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Chief Counsel, Bureau of the 
Public Debt, (304) 480-5187.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Although the Renegotiation Board is no 
longer in existence, other Federal Agencies are required to use 
interest rates computed under the criteria established by the 
Renegotiation Act of 1971 Sec. 2, Pub.L. 92-41, 85 Stat. 97. For 
example, the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 Sec. 12, Pub.L. 95-563, 92 
Stat. 2389 and the Prompt Payment Act of 1982 Sec. 2, Pub.L. 97-177, 96 
Stat. 85 provide for the calculation of interest due on claims at a 
rate established by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 
3902(a).
    Therefore, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the above 
mentioned sections, the Secretary of the Treasury has determined that 
the rate of interest applicable for the purpose of said sections, for 
the period beginning January 1, 1998 and ending on June 30, 1998, is 6 
1/4 per centum per annum.

    Dated: December 23, 1997.
Donald V. Hammond,
Deputy Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34049 Filed 12-24-97; 10:44 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-39-P
Document

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE
AON PLC 2011 INCENTIVE PLAN


This First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Aon plc 2011 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective March 29, 2019 (the “Plan”), is adopted by Aon plc, a public limited company incorporated under Irish law (the “Company”), to be effective as set forth below.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan allows the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Board dated September 13, 2021, the Board has approved an amendment to the Plan as set forth herein and delegated authority to the undersigned officer to execute such amendment. 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective September 13, 2021, by the last sentence of Section 6.5(c) with the following sentence:
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, and except as the Committee may otherwise determine with respect to individuals who are not designated as ‘officers’ under Rule 16a-1(f) of the Exchange Act, in no event will an Option or SAR granted to any employee become exercisable or vested prior to the first anniversary of the date on which it is granted, (and subject to acceleration of exercisability and vesting, to the extent permitted by, and subject to such terms and conditions determined by the Committee, in the event of the Participant’s death, disability, retirement, or involuntary termination or in connection with a Change in Control).”  








1








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer, this 13th day of September 2021.


AON plc                        
By:


_/s/ Christa Davies______________________________    
Christa Davies
Chief Financial Officer




2
#### Earsel REASER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 77-1515.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 21, 1978.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defendant and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Ronald A. Dion, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant below, appeals his conviction of grand larceny pursuant to a jury verdict, contending that the prosecutor’s comment on his post-arrest silence requires reversal.

*892A careful review of the record reveals that the comment at issue did not refer to defendant’s silence after he was placed in custody, but to his failure to voluntarily go to the police when he knew he was likely to be charged with a crime, and offer them the defense he later asserted at trial, viz., that someone else stole the property at issue.

Several days had elapsed between the incident and the defendant’s arrest. Defendant had scuffled with the complainant prior to fleeing the scene on foot, leaving his automobile behind. The car was easily traceable to him since it contained several identifying documents, and complainant could readily recognize him. Defendant should have known he was likely to be charged with a crime, and it is reasonable to believe that one who fears he is about to be charged with a crime committed by another would seek to exonerate himself as quickly as possible by volunteering exculpatory information to the police.

A defendant’s silence in such circumstances can be used at trial to impeach him after he has voluntarily taken the stand and offered testimony which is inconsistent with his earlier silence. The prosecutor’s comment was legitimate impeachment based on pre-arrest silence, not a comment on post-arrest silence, and therefore we find no error in the judgment below. *Lebowitz v. State,*343 So.2d 666 (Fla.3d DCA 1977); *United States ex rel. Burt v. New Jersey,*475 F.2d 234 (3d Cir. 1973).

Affirmed.
No. 10207.

#### Howert *v.*Howert.

Decided March 31, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Crawford county.

*Mr. J. W. McCarron*and *Mr. George B.*Okey, for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. J. Geer*and *Mr. Thomas*Beer, for defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Price, Summers and Davis, JJ., concur.
#### Ricky D. FRANKLIN, a minor, by and through his mother and next friend, Annie Baxter, Petitioner, v. DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF HENDRY COUNTY, Florida, Respondent.

No. 77-1888.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 29, 1978.

*932Robert J. Shapiro, Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc., Belle Glade, for petitioner.

Owen L. Luckey, Jr. of Luckey & Harrell, Labelle, for respondent.

BOARDMAN, Chief Judge.

Petitioner, Ricky Franklin, petitions for writ of certiorari to review his expulsion from high school by respondent, District School Board of Hendry County. He contends that all of the evidence both written and oral upon which the order of expulsion was based was hearsay and, therefore, insufficient to support the school board’s action. We agree and reverse.

The evidence tending to show petitioner’s guilt of the two acts upon which his expulsion was based consisted only of affidavits of the alleged student/victim and the testimony of the school principal and vice principal concerning what this student told them. No witness to the acts concerned testified nor did petitioner admit having committed either of the acts.

School expulsion proceedings are governed by Section 120.57, Florida Statutes (1975). *See*Section 230.23(6)(c), Florida Statutes (Supp.1976). Section 120.58, applicable to proceedings under Section 120.57, provides in pertinent part: “Hearsay evidence may be used for the purpose of supplementing or explaining other evidence, but it shall not be sufficient in itself to support a finding unless it would be admissible over objection in civil actions.” Clearly, all of the evidence introduced against petitioner constituted hearsay inadmissible over objection in a civil action. Accordingly, we must conclude that while admissible at the expulsion hearing, the hearsay standing alone was insufficient evidence upon which to predicate the order expelling petitioner.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

OTT and RYDER, JJ., concur.
Fw: MATS RIA for OMB Distribution 12/09 (Message 2 of 2) RobertJ Wayland to: Cortney_Higgins
12/09/2011 04:15 PM
Cc: Bill Maxwell

Cortney -

Attached are the remaining chapters.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division
Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290
Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

********************************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Chapter 5_HealthWelfareCobenefits_1209_clean.docx

Chapter 5_HealthWelfareCobenefits_1209 (REDLINE).docx

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209_clean.docx

Chapter 6_EmploymentImpactAnalysis_1209 (REDLINE).docx

Chapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1209_clean.docChapter 7_StatutoryandExecutiveOrderAnalyses_1209 (REDLINE).doc

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBenefits_1209_clean.doc

Chapter 8_SummaryofCostsandBen efits_1209 (REDLINE).doc
No. 10302.

#### The American Sewer Pipe Co. *v.*Kakascik.

Decided May 5, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Jefferson county.

*Mr. E. E. Erskine*and *Mr. Carl JJ. Smith,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. W. C. Brown,*for defendant in error.

*418Judgment affirmed.

Price, C. J., Shauc-k, Summers and Spear, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of GENESIS  COMPANIES GROUP, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Madhava  Rao Mankal,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Madhava Rao Mankal
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Madhava Rao Mankal,  CFO

Dated:  October 7, 2008
No. 72-1175.

#### Lobue *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Congoleum Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Roger S.
Marcus, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and H. N. Feist III, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Roger S. Marcus
------------------------------
Name:  Roger S. Marcus
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:   August 12, 2002

/s/ Howard N. Feist III
------------------------------
Name:  Howard N. Feist III
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:   August 12, 2002

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.