alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix M

VISTAS Modeling Reports 

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

9th Floor L&C Annex 

401 Church Street 

Nashville, TN 37243

TN Regional Haze SIP Appendix C.1 - 1
VISTAS Modeling Reports Appendix M - 2 

Pre-Hearing Draft October 12, 2007 

Regional Haze SIP for NC Class I Areas

1. Introduction 

The regional haze modeling was coordinated by the Southeast Regional Planning Organization, 

Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), which is 

comprised of the ten Southeast States (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North 

Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia) and the local programs and 

tribal agencies located within these states. VISTAS contracted with Environ International Corp, 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC and the University of California Riverside to perform the emissions and 

air quality modeling for this regional haze state and tribal implementation plans. This appendix 

contains several modeling reports produced by the contractors in support of these regional haze 

plans for the VISTAS states. 

Attachment M.1 contains the preliminary draft of the Technical Support Document for VISTAS 

Emissions and Air Quality Modeling to Support Regional Haze State Implementation Plans, as 

submitted by the VISTAS contractors. The document contains information on the development 

of the emission inventory, as well as a domain wide model performance evaluation. The 

document is still in its draft form, and the complete document will be included in the final 

submission of this state implementation plan. 

Attachment M.2 contains a description of the GEOS-Chem model and a performance evaluation 

of the boundary conditions prepared for the CMAQ modeling. 

Attachment M.3 is a contractor submitted document entitled VISTAS Area of Influence Analyses 

for Sulfur Dioxide. This document details the approach VISTAS used to determine sources of 

sulfur dioxide that impact VISTAS Class I areas, providing example calculations at each step for 

Sispey, Alabama. 

 

Attachment M.4 contains a description of the procedure for developing and displaying the Area 

of Influence back trajectories and residence time data, described in Attachment M.3 in Arc/INFO 

GIS. 
Appendix M.1 

Technical Support Document for VISTAS 

Emissions and Air Quality Modeling to 

Support Regional Haze State Implementation 

Plans 
Appendix M.2 

Application of GEOS CHEM for the 2002 

Boundary Conditions for CMAQ Modeling 

of the VISTAS Region 
Appendix M.3 

VISTAS Area of Influence Analyses for 

Sulfur Dioxide 
Appendix M.4 

Procedures for Developing and Displaying 

AoI Back-trajectory Residence Time GIS 

Data
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

ROSALYN A. METZGER 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM INACTIVE STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 191 DB 2015 (No. 2 RST 2016) 

Attorney Registration No. 74882 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated January 7, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

Rosalyn A. Metzger, who has been on Inactive Status, has never been suspended or 

disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and 

learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, 

hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall 

be paid by the Petitioner.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, David A. Nail, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of The Banker's Store, Inc. (the "small business issuer");



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those subsidiaries, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and;



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





| |                   | 
| | ----------------- | 
| | /s/ David A. Nail | 
| |                   | 
| | David A. Nail     | 
| | CFO               | 
| |                   | 
| | October 20, 2008  |
#### Robert BADER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Petitioner, v. The CURTIS PUBLISHING COMPANY and the Saturday Evening Post Company, Respondent.

No. 42951.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 15, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 266 So.2d *78.*

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (No. 333-59572 and 333-76542) and S-8 (No. 333-82755,
333-73170 and 333-90400) of CardioGenesis Corporation of our report dated
February 21, 2003, except Note 16 as to which the date is March 27, 2003,
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financials statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Orange County, California
March 31, 2003
#### Charles E. HALL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-1038.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 8, 1973.

Walter N. Colbath, Jr., Public Defender, and Charles W. Musgrove, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky and Andrew I. Friedrich, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

*91PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial without evidentiary hearing of defendant’s motion to vacate judgment pursuant to Rule 3.850, F.Cr.R., 33 F.S.A.

We have reviewed the defendant’s contentions in light of the prior decisions rendered by our courts and in light of Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274. We are of the opinion that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. See Gibson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 8; Brumley v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 447; State v. Barton, Fla.1967, 194 So.2d 241; Jernigan v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 66, cert. dism’d 228 So.2d 273, cert. den. 397 U.S. 1029, 90 S.Ct. 1279, 25 L.Ed.2d 541; Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446; O’Fallon v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 872; Kelly v. State, Fla.App.1971, 254 So.2d 22; People v. Sepulvado, 1970, 27 Mich.App. 66, 183 N.W.2d 327; Dill v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 502. Compare with Clark v. State, Fla.App.1972, 256 So.2d 551; Young v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 178; Johnson v. Wainwright, Fla.1970, 238 So.2d 590.

A reading of Boykin v. Alabama, supra,395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, indicates that that decision “simply requires an affirmative record showing that a guilty plea is entered voluntarily, intelligently, and understandingly, and holds the want of such a record invalidates the plea entered. . . .” See Johnson v. Wainwright, supra, Justice Ervin dissenting. Our reading of *Boykin*does not indicate the necessity of having the record demonstrate a specific enumeration and waiver of federal constitutional rights in order for a plea to have been voluntarily made.1 Kelly v. State, supra. In this connection we adopt the ruling and reasoning set forth by the Michigan Court of Appeals in Peo-pie v. Sepulvado, supra. See also Dill v. State, supra.

In the case sub judice the record *affirmatively*shows that the trial court conducted an inquiry into defendant’s plea of nolo contendere and that such inquiry as demonstrated from the record reflects that defendant’s plea was knowingly and understandingly made and was free from any threat, intimidation, coercion, promise or inducement of any kind. See Clark v. State, supra.

The requirement of *Boykin*having been satisfied and otherwise finding no reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

WALDEN, OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

1

. Defendant contends that *Doyhin*requires that a record be made of the voluntariness of the waiver of the right to jury trial, right to confront witnesses and privilege against self-incrimination, and that the failure of the record to reflect the foregoing vitiates the voluntariness of any plea.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7326 

To amend section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to ensure 

that efforts to engage in espionage or technology transfer are considered 

in visa issuance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2020 

Mrs. HARTZLER (for herself, Mr. GALLAGHER, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. 

ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. POSEY, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. PERRY, Mr. MULLIN, 

Mr. SPANO, Mr. GIANFORTE, Mr. WRIGHT, and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act to ensure that efforts to engage in espionage or 

technology transfer are considered in visa issuance, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting America 

5 From Spies Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7326 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING INADMISSIBILITY ON SECURITY AND 

2 RELATED GROUNDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 212(a)(3)(A) of the Im4 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(3)(A)) 

5 is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any alien is inadmis7 sible who a consular officer or the Secretary of 

8 Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable 

9 ground to believe— 

10 ‘‘(i) engages, has engaged, or will en11 gage in any activity— 

12 ‘‘(I) in violation of any law of the 

13 United States relating to espionage or 

14 sabotage; or 

15 ‘‘(II) that would violate any law 

16 of the United States relating to espio17 nage or sabotage if the activity oc18 curred in the United States; 

19 ‘‘(ii) engages, has engaged, or will en20 gage in any activity in violation or evasion 

21 of any law prohibiting the export from the 

22 United States of goods, technology, or sen23 sitive information; 

24 ‘‘(iii) seeks to enter the United States 

25 to engage solely, principally, or incidentally 

26 in any other unlawful activity; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7326 IH

1 ‘‘(iv) seeks to enter the United States 

2 to engage solely, principally, or incidentally 

3 in any activity a purpose of which is the 

4 opposition to, or the control or overthrow 

5 of, the Government of the United States by 

6 force, violence, or other unlawful means; or 

7 ‘‘(v) is the spouse or child of an alien 

8 who is inadmissible under this subpara9 graph, if the activity causing the alien to 

10 be found inadmissible occurred within the 

11 last 5 years.’’. 

12 (b) WAIVER AUTHORITY.—Section 212(d)(3)(A) of 

13 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

14 1182(d)(3)(A)) is amended— 

15 (1) by striking ‘‘(3)(A)(i)(I), (3)(A)(ii),’’ each 

16 place such term appears; and 

17 (2) by inserting ‘‘(3)(A)(iv),’’ after 

18 ‘‘(3)(A)(iii),’’ each place such term appears. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

RESTORATION HARDWARE, INC.    CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Restoration Hardware, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Patricia A. McKay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

This
Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:
April 12, 2004

|    |  |                                                                |  | 
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Patricia A. McKayPatricia A. McKay Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---

QuickLinks
# Official Journal C 247/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.247.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 247 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5628 August 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.247.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 247

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5628 August 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 247/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6969 — Valeant Pharmaceuticals International/Bausch & Lomb Holdings) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 247/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6969 — Valeant Pharmaceuticals International/Bausch & Lomb Holdings) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 247/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 247/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 247/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7025 — Oiltanking/Macquarie/Chemoil Storage) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |
| 2013/C 247/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6924 — Refresco Group/Pride Foods) (1) | 5 |
| 2013/C 247/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7027 — Bregal Fund III/ISG) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 247/06 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2013/C 247/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7025 — Oiltanking/Macquarie/Chemoil Storage) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

2013/C 247/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6924 — Refresco Group/Pride Foods) (1)

5

2013/C 247/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.7027 — Bregal Fund III/ISG) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2013/C 247/06

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8449-8450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4531]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR part 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Aero-Mar-Terra Forwarding, 22302 Acorngrove Drive, Spring, TX 77389,

[[Page 8450]]

Jose Guillermo Saavedra, Sole Proprietor
International Transport Services, 18747 Sheldon Road, Cleveland, OH 
44130, Officers: Lawrence P. Yankow, President, JoAnne Hill, Secretary
Royal International Freight Forwarding Company, 366 Woodlawn Avenue, 
Jersey City, NJ 07305-1306, Louis A. Espinoza, Sole Proprietor
Quality Cargo & Messenger Corp., 4770 N.W. 178th Terrace, Miami, FL 
33055, Officer: Ana G. Leon, President

    Dated: February 19, 1997.
Joseph C. Polking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4531 Filed 2-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter J. Zable, Chairman,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
| /s/ W. J. Zable                                  |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| W. J. Zable                                      |   |
| Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                             |   |
| Date: May 2, 2007                                |   |

 

----
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
  





 
  

			
	 Cynthia L Gibson
 Executive
Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary
	  	 9721 Sherrill Blvd. | Knoxville, TN 37932

865-560-4440

cynthia.gibson@scrippsnetworks.com


 Amendment No. 3 to 

Employment Agreement 
 March 3, 2014

 Mr. Kenneth W. Lowe 
 9721 Sherrill Boulevard 

Knoxville, TN 37932 
  

	Re:	Amendment to Employment Agreement 

 Dear Ken: 

This Amendment No. 3 (this “Amendment”) to your Employment Agreement with Scripps Networks Interactive, Inc. (the “Company”), dated as
of March 29, 2010, as amended as of October 6, 2010 and August 1, 2012 (the “Employment Agreement”), amends the Employment Agreement as expressly stated herein. 

 

	1.	Term. The first sentence of Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is amended by deleting “December 31, 2015” and replacing it with “December 31, 2016”. 


 

	2.	Annual Salary. The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


“For all the services rendered by you in any capacity under this Agreement, the Company agrees to pay you $1,420,000 a year in base salary
(“Annual Salary”), less applicable deductions and withholding taxes, in accordance with the Company’s payroll practices as they may exist from time to time during the Term.” 

 

	3.	No Other Amendments. Except as expressly amended, modified and supplemented hereby, the provisions of the Employment Agreement are and will remain in full force and effect and shall be binding on the parties
thereto. References in the Employment Agreement or in any other document to the Employment Agreement shall refer to the Employment Agreement, as amended hereby. 

  

	4.	Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. 









 Kenneth W. Lowe 

March 3, 2014 
 Page 2 

 
 If the foregoing correctly sets forth our understanding, please sign, date and return
all three copies of this Amendment to the undersigned for execution on behalf of the Company; after this Agreement has been executed by the Company and a fully-executed copy returned to you, it shall constitute a binding agreement between us. 

 

	
	Sincerely yours,
	
	/s/ Cynthia L. Gibson
	Cynthia L. Gibson
	EVP, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary


  

	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
	
	/s/ Kenneth W. Lowe
	Kenneth W. Lowe