63930 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 232 / Wednesday, December 3, 1997 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP97–513–000]

Texaco Natural Gas Company v. Sea

Robin Pipeline Company; Notice of

Technical Conference

November 26, 1997.

The filing in the above captioned

proceeding raises issues that should be

addressed in a technical conference.

Take notice that the technical

conference will be held on Thursday,

December 11, 1997, at 1:00 p.m., in a

room to be designated at the offices of

the Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission, 888 First Street, N.E.,

Washington, D.C. 20426.

All interested parties and Staff are

permitted to attend.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–31658 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. ER97–3113–002]

Texas Utilities Electric Company;

Notice of Filing

November 26, 1997.

Take notice that, on November 14,

1997, Texas Utilities Electric Company

(‘‘TU Electric’’) tendered for filing an

open-access Tariff for Transmission

Service To, From and Over Certain

HVDC Interconnections (‘‘TFO Tariff’’)

and amendments to four transmission

service agreements with Central Power

and Light Company, West Texas

Utilities Company, Public Service

Company of Oklahoma and

Southwestern Electric Power Company,

previously designated as Rate Schedule

FERC Nos. Two through Five, in

compliance with the Commission’s

October 15, 1997 ‘‘Order Accepting

Revised Transmission Tariffs for Filing,

As Modified, and Granting Waiver of

Notice Requirements’’.

Copies of the filing were served on all

parties of record.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18

CFR 385.214). All such motions or

protests should be filed on or before

December 9, 1997. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–31644 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. RP98–58–000]

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line

Corporation; Notice of Proposed

Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

November 26, 1997.

Take notice that on November 21,

1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line

Corporation (Transco) tendered for

filing certain revised tariff sheets to its

FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume

No. 1 which tariff sheets are enumerated

in Appendix A attached to the filing.

The referenced tariff sheets are

proposed to be effective December 21,

1997.

Transco states that the purpose of the

instant filing is to revise certain of

Transco’s currently effective tariff sheets

to (i) correct various spelling,

punctuation, wording, and reference

errors, (ii) provide for a daily capacity

release rate for volumetric releases

associated with the Maiden Lateral

surcharge, (iii) change Section 5.2(g) of

the General Terms and conditions to

more accurately reflect Transco’s

practice when making metering

adjustments and (iv) update the Form of

Service Agreements to include an

effective time of 9:00 a.m. Central clock

time and to change the effective and

termination date fields to be usable for

the year 2000 and beyond, all as further

described in Attachment 1 to the filing.

Transco states that copies of the filing

are being mailed to its affected

customers and interested State

Commissions.

Any person desiring to be heard or to

protest said filing should file a motion

to intervene or protest with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888

First Street, NE, Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Sections

385.214 and 385.211 of the

Commission’s Rules and Regulations.

All such motions or protests must be

filed as provided in Section 154.210 of

the Commission’s Regulations. Protests

will be considered by the Commission

in determining the appropriate action to

be taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection in the Public Reference

Room.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–31661 Filed 12–2–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–M

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. OR98–2–000]

Ultramar Diamond Shamrock

Corporation, Complainant v. SFPP,

L.P., Respondent; Notice of Complaint

November 26, 1997.

Take notice that on November 21,

1997, pursuant to Rule 206 of the Rules

of Practice and Procedure of the

Commission, 18 CFR 385.206, Sections

9, 13, and 15 of the Interstate Commerce

Act (ICA), 49 U.S.C. app. §§ 9, 13, and

15 (1994), and Section 1803 of the

Energy Policy Act of 1992, Ultramar

Diamond Shamrock Corporation

(Ultramar Diamond) filed a complaint

against SFPP, L.P. (SFPP), as part of

Ultramar Diamond’s motion to intervene

in Docket No. OR98–1–000.

Ultramar Diamond asserts that SFPP

violated and continues to violate

Section 1(5), 2, 3(1), 4, 6, and 8 of the

ICA by: (a) establishing and charging

unjust and unreasonable rates for its

jurisdictional services; (b) charging

unduly discriminatory or preferential

rates and charges for its jurisdictional

services; and (c) assessing untariffed

rates and charges for jurisdictional

interstate services. 49 U.S.C. app.

§§ 1(5), 2, 3(1), 4, 6, and 8 (1994).

Ultramar Diamond requests that the

Commission (1) examine the rates and

charges collected by SFPP for its

jurisdictional interstate service, (2)

order refunds to Ultramar Diamond to

the extent the Commission finds that

such rates or charges were unlawful, (3)

determine just, reasonable, and

nondiscriminatory rates for SFPP’s

jurisdictional interstate service; and

award Ultramar Diamond reasonable

attorneys’ fees in accordance with the

ICA, including Sections 8, 9, 15, and 16