alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 15INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Cubic Corporation

We
have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of March 31, 2001, and the related consolidated condensed statements of income
and cash flows for the three-and six-month periods ended March 31, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We
conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists
principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based
on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

We
have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of
September 30, 2000 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated
November 28, 2000, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance
sheet at September 30, 2000, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.



San
Diego, California
May 2, 2001

---

QuickLinks
_____________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 

COMMISSIONERS: Jon Leibowitz, Chairman 

J. Thomas Rosch 

 Edith Ramirez

 Julie Brill 

) 

In the Matter of ) 

) 

GRACO INC., ) Docket No. 9350 

 a corporation, ) 

) PUBLIC 

ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC., ) 

a corporation, and ) 

) 

ITW FINISHING LLC, ) 

a limited liability company. ) 

_____________________________________) 

ORDER WITHDRAWING MATTER FROM ADJUDICATION FOR THE 

PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING A PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT 

Complaint Counsel and Counsel for the Respondents having filed a joint motion to withdraw this 

matter from adjudication to enable the Commission to consider a proposed Consent Agreement; and 

Complaint Counsel and Counsel for the Respondents having submitted a proposed Consent 

Agreement containing a proposed Decision and Order, executed by the Respondents and by Complaint 

Counsel and approved by the Director of the Bureau of Competition which, if accepted by the 

Commission, would resolve this matter in its entirety; 

IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.25(c) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 16 C.F.R. 

§ 3.25(c), that this matter in its entirety be, and it hereby is, withdrawn from adjudication, and that all 

proceedings before the Administrative Law Judge are hereby stayed as the Commission evaluates the 

proposed Consent Agreement, pursuant to Rule 3.25(f), 16 C.F.R. § 3.25(f); and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.25(b) of the Commission Rules of Practice, 

16 C.F.R. § 3.25(b), that the proposed Consent Agreement shall not be placed on the public record unless 

and until it is accepted by the Commission. 

By the Commission. 

 Donald S. Clark

 Secretary 

Issued: March 13, 2012
#### WESLEY OF FLORIDA, INC., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, Respondent.

No. EE-391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 15, 1977.

S. Gordon Blalock of Blalock, Holbrook & Akel, P. A., Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Spiro T. Kypreos and John A. Barley, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The prayer of the petition for review is DENIED. Petitioner’s motion to tax costs is DENIED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                         281,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,104,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                    92,870
<INVENTORY>                                  5,071,149
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,488,079
<PP&E>                                       5,069,989
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,257,190
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,758,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,912,495
<BONDS>                                        141,947
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,299
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,691,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,758,763
<SALES>                                      6,096,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,096,191
<CGS>                                        4,123,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,123,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,863,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                32,008
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             349,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,219,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,219,628)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,219,628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.92)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 67601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33766]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[IL159-1b; FRL-5938-3]


Approval and Promulgation of State Plans For Designated 
Facilities and Pollutants; Illinois

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve Illinois' Section 111(d)/129 State 
Plan submitted on June 23, 1997, for implementing and enforcing the 
Emissions Guidelines applicable to existing municipal waste combustors 
with capacity to combust more than 250 tons/day of municipal solid 
waste. In the final rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is 
approving this action as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no 
adverse written comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set 
forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse written comments are 
received in response to that direct final rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse 
written comments (which have not already been responded to), the direct 
final rule will be withdrawn and the written public comments will be 
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. Any 
parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this 
time.

DATES: Written comments on this proposed rule must be received on or 
before January 28, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be mailed to: J. Elmer Bortzer, 
Chief, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Copies of the State submittal are available for inspection at: 
Regulation Development Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark J. Palermo, Environmental 
Protection Specialist, Regulation Development Section, Air Programs 
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West 
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6082.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule published in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: December 11, 1997
Gail A. Ginsberg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region V.
[FR Doc. 97-33766 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 11.1
                               Dean Foods Company
                      Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share
           Nine Months Ended February 22, 1998 and February 23, 1997
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Nine Months Ended
                                                        -----------------
                                                February 22,          February 23,
                                                    1998                 1997
                                                ------------          ------------
<S>                                             <C>                   <C>

Net Income                                         $73,117              $57,621 
                                                   =======              ======= 
                                                                                
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC                                               
---------------------------------                                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding          40,556               40,162 
                                                   =======              ======= 
                                                                                
Net earnings per share - Basic                     $  1.80              $  1.43 
                                                   =======              ======= 
                                                                                
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - DILUTED                                             
-----------------------------------                                             
Weighted average common shares outstanding          40,556               40,162 
Plus incremental shares from assumed                                            
  conversions of stock options                         935                   94 
                                                   -------              ------- 
                                                                                
Adjusted weighted average shares                    41,491               40,256 
                                                   =======              ======= 
                                                                                
Net earnings per share - Diluted                   $  1.76              $  1.43 
                                                   =======              ======= 
</TABLE>
#### Jeffrey E. CAKE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-857.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 2, 1971.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1

Independent Auditors Consent and Report on Schedule




To the Board of Directors
and Stockholders
Restoration Hardware, Inc.
Corte Madera, California







We consent to incorporation by reference
 in Registration Statement Nos. 333-58684, 333-45638, 333-66065, 333-72288 and 333-81430
 of Restoration Hardware, Inc, on Form S-8 and Registration Statement
Nos. 333-62178, 333-70624 and 333-74668 of
 Restoration Hardware, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated April 23, 2002 (September 13,
 2002 as to Note 1 and December 23, 2002 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in
 Note 13), which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement discussed in
Note 13, appearing in this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
 Restoration Hardware, Inc. for the year ended February 2, 2002.




Our audit of the financial
 statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the financial
 statement schedule of Restoration Hardware, Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2). The financial
 statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
 responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such
 financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
 statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
 forth therein.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
San Francisco, California
December 23, 2002
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7279 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to prohibit the payment of 

bonuses to highly compensated individuals employed by the debtor and 

insiders of the debtor to perform services during the bankruptcy case, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2020 

Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to prohibit 

the payment of bonuses to highly compensated individuals employed by the debtor and insiders of the debtor 

to perform services during the bankruptcy case, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Bonuses Ahead 

5 of Bankruptcy Filing Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7279 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

2 Section 503 of title 11 of the United States Code is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(d)(1) During the 2-year period ending 1 year after 

5 the date of the filing of the petition and notwithstanding 

6 any other provision of this section, there shall neither be 

7 allowed nor paid a bonus to— 

8 ‘‘(A) an individual employed by the debtor at an 

9 annual rate of compensation exceeding $250,000; 

10 ‘‘(B) an insider of the debtor; or 

11 ‘‘(C) an individual employed by the debtor to 

12 the extent that such bonus would cause that individ13 ual’s annual rate of compensation to exceed 

14 $250,000. 

15 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘bonus’ 

16 means a transfer to, or obligation incurred for the benefit 

17 of, an individual employed by the debtor or insider of the 

18 debtor as compensation for services in an amount that— 

19 ‘‘(A) is in addition to the existing wages, salary, 

20 or base compensation of an insider of the debtor or 

21 individual employed by the debtor; and 

22 ‘‘(B) can be construed as a form of retention, 

23 incentive, or reward related to the services provided 

24 to the debtor by the insider or the individual em25 ployed by the debtor. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7279 IH

1 The term ‘bonus’ does not include a sales commission. Nor 

2 does the term ‘bonus’ include any transfer or obligation 

3 pursuant to the terms of a collective bargaining agree4 ment. 

5 ‘‘(3) The term ‘an individual employed by the debtor’ 

6 includes, but is not limited to, an employee, consultant, 

7 or contractor.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT. 

9 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub10 section (b), this Act and the amendment made by this Act 

11 shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

12 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment 

13 made by this Act shall apply only with respect to cases 

14 commenced under title 11 of the United States Code on 

15 or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Walter J. Zable, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCorporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
| /s/  W. J. Zable                                  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| W.  J. Zable                                      |   |
| Chairman,  President, and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                              |   |
| Date: August 3, 2010                         |   |

 

----
No. 10551.

#### American Telephone & Telegraph Co. *v.*Young et al.

Decided March 17, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Pluron county.

*Messrs. C. P. & L. W. Wickham*and *Messrs. Squire, Sanders & Dempsey,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. A. V. Andrews*and *Mr. S. M. Young,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price, Crew, Summers, Spear and Davis, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Foreign Claims Settlement Commission
[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 3-97]


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR Part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings and oral hearings for the transaction of Commission business 
and other matters specified, as follows:
    Date and Time: Monday, February 24, 1997, 10:00 a.m.
    Subject Matter: 1. Consideration of Proposed Decisions on claims 
against Albania
    2. Hearings on the record on objections to Proposed Decisions in 
the following claims against Albania:

ALB-010--Peter Panos
ALB-015--Sophocles Panagiotis
ALB-032, ALB-034, ALB-035, and ALB-043--Cleopatra Karselas, Eftalia 
Maliou, George Karselas, and Olga Dntule
ALB-045--Vangjo Gregori
ALB-067--Zhaneta Faber
ALB-092--Thanas Laske
ALB-117--James Elias
ALB-122--Vaios Karagiannis
ALB-123--Thomas S. Kalyvas
ALB-124--Elias Kalyvas
ALB-146--Constance Z. Zotos and Cleopatra Bizoukas
ALB-151--Victoria Gallani
ALB-178--Hariklia Zoto
ALB-210--Aristokli P. Cifligu
ALB-216--Rita Deto Sefla
ALB-217--Arthur Generalis
ALB-221--Dimetra A. Gregory
ALB-238--Edward Mehmet
ALB-244--Near East Foundation
ALB-278--Violet K. Veli
Status: Open

    Subject matter not disposed of at the scheduled meeting may be 
carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, N.W., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or 
advance notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be 
directed to: Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement 
Commission, 600 E Street, NW., Room 6029, Washington, DC 20579. 
Telephone: (202) 616-6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC, February 12, 1997.
Judith H. Lock,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-3999 Filed 2-13-97; 9:40 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
ORIGINAL
 

UNITED STATES OF AMRICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMSSION 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

) Docket No. 9327 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

ORDER CLOSING HEARING RECORD 

AN SETTING CLOSING ARGUMNTS 

Pusuant to Commission Rule 3 .44( c), the hearing record is hereby closed. Corrections 

to the record may stil be made, if necessar, pursuant to Commission Rule 3.44(b). 

Closing arguments are scheduled for August 20,2009 at 1:00 p.m., in room 532, Federal 

Trade Commission Building, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. Closing 

arguments are limited to no more than two hours per side. 

ORDERED: ~f2a~
 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: June 22, 2009
#### Violet Rose DURELL, Appellant, v. Ann Altsheler SNYDER, Appellee.

No. 72-1008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 6, 1973.

Appeal dismissed.
United States Court of Appeals 

### FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-3538MN

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United Sta tes * District Court for the v. * District of Minnesota. * Lorenzo Martin Devine, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: March 14, 1997 Filed: March 26, 1997

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.
Lorenzo Martin Devine appeals the district court’s orde r revo king Devine’s supervised release and imposing a term o f imprisonment followed by a period of supervised release. In a brief filed under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) , coun sel contends Devine’s revocation hearing was untimely unde r Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(2). The record d oes not support counsel’s contention, see United States v. Blunt , 680 F.2d 1216, 1219 (8th Cir. 1982), and Devine suffered no prejudice from the delay before his federal revocation hearing, see United States v. Chaklader , 987 F.2d 75, 76- 77 (1st Cir. 1993) (per curiam); cf. United States v. Smith , 80 F.3d 1188, 1191-92 (7th Cir. 1996) . Counsel also contends the district court lacked authority to impose a punishment that combined imprisonment and supervised release on-2-

revocation of Devine’s original supervised release term; however, this argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v.-3-

Love , 19 F.3d 415, 416 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 43 4 (1994). Based on our review of the record, we find no nonfr ivolous issue for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We thus affirm the district court. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Službeni list C 239E/2013

| | ISSN 1977-1088
  doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.239.hrv |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 239E |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | 5620. kolovoza 2013. |

ISSN 1977-1088

doi:10.3000/19771088.CE2013.239.hrv

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 239E

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

5620. kolovoza 2013.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| | REZOLUCIJE |
| | Europski parlament |
| 2013/C 239E/01 | Obavijest za čitatelje | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

REZOLUCIJE

Europski parlament

2013/C 239E/01

Obavijest za čitatelje

1

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

REZOLUCIJE

Europski parlament

| 20.8.2013 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CE 239/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2013

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CE 239/1

---

OBAVIJEST ZA ČITATELJE

Rezolucije Europskog parlamenta objavljene u drugim jezičnim verzijama u ovom izdanju Službenog lista usvojene su prije pristupanja Hrvatske Europskoj uniji te stoga nisu prevedene na hrvatski.

---