alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7996]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4248]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 35 / Friday, February 21, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 7996]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agriculture Research Service


Notice of Federal Invention Available for Licensing and Intent to 
Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability and intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a Federally owned invention, U.S. 
Plant Patent Application Serial No. 08/634,149, filed April 19, 1996, 
entitled ``Tift 94 Bermudagrass'' is available for licensing and that 
the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service 
intends to grant to The University of Georgia Research Foundation of 
Athens, Georgia, an exclusive license for U.S. Plant Patent Application 
Serial No. 08/634,149.

DATES: Comments must be received by May 22, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of the Director, 
National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, Room 2042, 1815 
N. University Street, Peoria, Illinois 61604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Watkins of the National Center 
for Agricultural Utilization Research at the Peoria address given 
above; telephone: 309-681-6545.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as The University of Georgia 
Research Foundation has submitted a complete and sufficient application 
for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-
bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted 
unless, within ninety days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
R.M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-4248 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William W. Boyle, Senior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|   | /s/ W. W. Boyle                                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | W. W. Boyle                                        |
|   | Senior Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                               |
|   | Date: August 1, 2007                               |

 

----
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

January 5, 2024 SC-2023-0848 Ex parte M.P. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: M.P. v. DeKalb County Department of Human Resources) (DeKalb Juvenile Court: JU-22-73.02; Civil Appeals: CL-2023-0184).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on January 5, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Shaw, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Bryan, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
#### John James BELL, Appellant, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Appellee.

No. 73-1467.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Pablo Perhacs, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and C. Marie Bernard, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

By three separate informations, John James Bell was charged in the Criminal Court of Record of Palm Beach County, Florida, with having committed, in November 1971, violations of the narcotics law (No. 72C-793) and violations of the drug abuse law (Nos. 71C-1881 and 71C-1946). He pled guilty to possession of heroin (No. 72C-793), delivery of PCP (71C-1881, and possession of PCP (71C-1946), for which he received sentences of two years, one year, and one year eleven months twenty-three days, respectively.

After the decision of the Supreme Court in State v. Camil, Fla.1973, 279 So.2d 832, Bell filed a motion to vacate the judgment and sentences on the drug abuse violations on the grounds that at the time of the alleged offenses PCP was not an illegal drug under F.S. Chapter 404, F.S.A., and hence the informations did not charge a crime. The motion to vacate was denied and Bell filed petition for writ of habeas corpus in this court, alleging that his right to appeal from such denial had been frustrated by state action. We issued to respondent a rule to show cause why petitioner not be entitled to delayed appellate review of such order. The response to the rule, while making no reference to the issue of whether petitioner is now entitled to delayed appellate review, concedes that the informa-tions in No. 71C-1881 and No. 71C-1946 charge no crime under the laws of Florida and that the judgment and sentences entered thereon should be vacated.

Under the circumstances, it is apparent that justice requires that we vacate the respective judgments and sentences in No. 71C-1881 and 71C-1946. Time served by petitioner in custody of respondent shall be credited on any other judgment and sentence under which respondent has lawful custody of petitioner, including sentence in No. 72C-793, and petitioner’s entitlement to discharge from custody shall be computed accordingly.

It is so ordered.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Jessie MARTIN v. C. Paul PHELPS, Director Dept. of Corrections.

No. 61449.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 17, 1978.

In re: Jessie Martin, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Livingston.

Writ granted. Evidentiary hearing ordered.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3790]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Docket 5-97]


Proposed Foreign-Trade Zone--Durant, Oklahoma; Application and 
Public Hearing

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones Board 
(the Board) by Rural Enterprises of Oklahoma, Inc., (an Oklahoma not-
for-profit corporation), to establish a general-purpose foreign-trade 
zone in the City of Durant, Oklahoma, at a site that is within 90 miles 
of the Dallas/Fort Worth Customs port of entry. The application was 
submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as 
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the Board (15 CFR 
Part 400). It was formally filed on January 30, 1997. The applicant is 
authorized to make the proposal under Senate Joint Resolution No. 3 of 
the First Session of the 45th Oklahoma Legislature.
    The proposed zone is located in southeastern Oklahoma, 
approximately 10 miles north of the Oklahoma-Texas border. The closest 
Customs port of entry is Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas. The proposed site is 
situated on 30 acres within the 280-acre Texoma Industrial Park near 
U.S. Highway 69/75 in Durant. The property is owned by the City of 
Durant. The closest existing zone project in Oklahoma is at Oklahoma 
City some 150 miles to the north.
    The application contains evidence of the need for zone services in 
the Durant area. Several firms have indicated an interest in using zone 
procedures within the proposed project for-2-warehousing/distribution 
activity. Specific manufacturing approvals are not being sought at this 
time. Requests would be made to the Board on a case-by-case basis.
    In accordance with the Board's regulations, a member of the FTZ 
Staff has been designated examiner to investigate the application and 
report to the Board.
    As part of the investigation, the Commerce examiner will hold a 
public hearing on March 6, 1997 at 9:00 a.m., at the Robert L. Williams 
Public Library, 323 West Beech, Durant, Oklahoma 74701.
    Public comment on the application is invited from interested 
parties. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 
Board's Executive Secretary at the address below. The closing period 
for their receipt is March 21, 1997. Rebuttal comments in response to 
material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during 
the subsequent 15-day period to April 7, 1997.
    A copy of the application and accompanying exhibits will be 
available during this time for public inspection at the following 
locations:

Office of Rural Enterprises of Oklahoma, Inc., 422 Cessna, Durant, 
Oklahoma 74701
Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 
3716, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
John J. Da Ponte, Jr.,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3790 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Ex-10.17 FY 2014 Base Salaries of Named Executive Officers






Exhibit 10.17






Dynex Capital, Inc.
2014 Base Salaries for Executive Officers






The 2014 base salaries for Dynex Capital, Inc.’s executive officers are as follows: Thomas B. Akin, Executive Chairman -$500,000; Byron L. Boston, Chief Executive Officer, President and Co-Chief Investment Officer-$750,000; Stephen J. Benedetti, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer-$350,000; and Smriti L. Popenoe, Executive Vice President and Co-Chief Investment Officer-$408,000.
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**DPL Inc.**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officersof DPL Inc. (the “Issuer”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2009, which this certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatthe information contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuers as of thedates and for the periods expressed therein.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thisstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuers and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Signed:                                |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
|                                   |   |
| /s/ Paul M. Barbas                     |   |
| Paul M. Barbas                         |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|                                   |   |
| Date: July 29,  2009              |   |

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Issuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

1

----
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ORIGINAL

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES 

)


In the Matter of
 ) 

)
 UNIVERSAL COMPUTERS and
 ) ELECTRONICS, INC., )
 d/b/a Appliancebestbuys.com, and DOCKET NO. 9347
 )
 d/b/a universallcdtv.com,
 )


Respondent.
 ) 

) 

) 

ORDER DESIGNATING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

Pursuant to authority vested in the Federal Trade Commission and delegated to 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

IT is ORDERED that D. Michael Chappell, Chief Administrative Law Judge of 

this Commission, be, and hereby is, designated and appointed to take testimony and 

receive evidence in this proceeding and to perform all other duties authorized by law. 

ORDERED: ~~ofd 

D. Michael Cappel 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: April 7, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
          EXTRACTED FROM LYNTON GROUP, INC.'S AUDITED ANNUAL
          REPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
          AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
          SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>              OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                        2,329,234
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                 4,955,822
<ALLOWANCES>                     22,895
<INVENTORY>                  13,480,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             21,563,875
<PP&E>                       32,145,789
<DEPRECIATION>                4,878,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               62,558,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        22,175,310
<BONDS>                      30,064,472
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                      1,918,462
<OTHER-SE>                    2,853,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 62,558,050
<SALES>                       6,909,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              6,909,971
<CGS>                         5,436,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 6,354,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 19,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              314,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 221,273
<INCOME-TAX>                     28,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             192,373
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                    192,373
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.03 
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.03
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Blake HARVESTON.

No. 54441.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1974.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for Remedial Writs and Stay Order.

Writ denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction during the course of the trial.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. In my view the ruling of the trial judge is palpably erroneous. The ruling should be reversed and the evidence admitted subject to objection of defense counsel. The matter can be reviewed on appeal under the above procedure. This ruling may have the effect of demolishing the State’s case.

DIXON, J.,

concurs. The ruling of the. trial judge appears to be correct.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0191
No. 10390.

#### Russell *v.*Fargo et al., Trustees, et al.

Decided June 9, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Richland county.

*Mr. H. E. Bell,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. H. L. Peeke*and *Messrs. Cummings, McBride & Wolfe,*for defendants in error.

Judgment' affirmed.

Price, C. J., Spiauck, Crew and Summers, JJ., concur.
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Janet SAUMELL and Francisco Saumell, her husband, Appellees.

No. 72-457.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 29, 1973.

Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Selwood and Steven R. Berger, Miami, for appellant.

Weissenborn, Burr & Hyman, Miami, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

*102PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an adverse summary final judgment entered in a declaratory judgment action, whereby the ap-pellees sought a declaration of their rights under an automobile insurance policy issued by the appellant.

The appellees were involved in an accident with an automobile driven by one Karpf. Karpf was allegedly at fault. He was insured by the Main Insurance Company. Thereafter, Karpf’s insurer became insolvent. The appellees filed the instant action seeking a determination of their right to recover for said accident under the uninsured motorist coverage of their automobile insurance policy, issued by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The appellant answered and raised as an affirmative defense that the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association,1 rather than the appellant, was liable on the claim. The appellees moved for a summary judgment and attorney fees. After hearing, the trial court granted both and entered the summary final judgment appealed herein.

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in entering the summary final judgment appealed, on the ground that pursuant to § 627.727(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., the appellees must present their claim to the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association upon the tortfeasor’s insurer becoming insolvent. We disagree.

§ 627.727(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., does not apply in the instant case, as the appellees arc not making a claim against an insolvent insurer but are making a claim against their own uninsured motorist carrier who is, in fact, solvent. Pursuant to law, State Farm offered uninsured motorist coverage to its insured for an additional premium. This was accepted by the appel-lees, who elected to secure the coverage and paid an additional premium. They should not be put to the task of seeking relief against the Association; they are entitled to certain rights under their policy, to wit: the right of arbitration, which is not available in an action against the Association. Further, if they are entitled to recover under their policy they may recover the total amount of their claim up to its limits. Whereas, in an action against the Association the claimant must absorb the first $100.00 of loss.

Therefore, we affirm the action of the trial judge here under review.

Affirmed.

1

. Ch. 631, part II, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.
August 14, 2015

Mr. Uriah Shockley

Rockwall Home Inspections

101 Oakridge Drive

Rockwall, TX 75032

Dear Mr. Shockley:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 91.103(b)(2), 91.105, 91.109, 91.151, 91.105, parts 60 – 67 and part 21 of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what 

you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Rockwall Home Inspections

into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−2019), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3