alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Balance Sheet, Cash Flow and Statement of Operations and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,417,746
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,626,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                   411,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,506,731
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,317,944
<PP&E>                                       1,358,010
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,001,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,564,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,447,007
<LT-DEBT>                                    1,245,851
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,607,395
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,735,992)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,564,261
<SALES>                                     15,853,002
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,853,002
<CGS>                                        4,595,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,595,582
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             200,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,038,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                   120,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            918,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   918,973
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

 

Each of the undersigned, in hisor her capacity as an officer of Cubic Corporation hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The report of Cubic Corporation (the“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the “Report”),which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934.

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theRegistrant at the end of such quarter and the results of operations of theRegistrant for such quarter.

 

 
| /S/  W. J. Zable    |                     | /S/ W.W.  Boyle |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|-----------------|--------|
| W. J. Zable              | W. W. Boyle              |
| Chief  Executive Officer | Chief  Financial Officer |
|                     |                     |
| Date:  January 30, 2004  |                     |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC
FINANCIAL REPORT
OF
SENSYTECH, INC.

We, the undersigned, being the chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, respectively, of Sensytech, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, to the best of our information, knowledge and
belief, that (1) the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78o(d)) and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ S. Kent Rockwell
S. Kent Rockwell
Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Donald F. Fultz
Donald F. Fultz
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Sensytech, Inc. and will be retained by
Sensytech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

22
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-153474, No. 333-130007, No. 333-10178, and No. 333-31813 on Form S-8 and No. 333-129242, No. 333-125012, No. 333-117768, and No. 333-95235 onForm S-3 of our reports dated March 30, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Wet Seal, Inc. and the effectiveness of The Wet Seal, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K of The Wet Seal, Inc. for the year ended January 29, 2011. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Costa Mesa, CA 

March 30, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3887]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50-368]


Correction to Exemption

    ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC. (Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2).

    In notice document 97-2377 beginning on page 4818, in the issue of 
Friday, January 31, 1997, make the following correction:
    On page 4819, in the third column, second full paragraph, in line 
5, (61 FR 20846) should be corrected to read, (61 FR 37774).


    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day of February 1997.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Frank J. Miraglia,
Acting Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 97-3887 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          33,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  283,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,898
<INVENTORY>                                    164,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               500,934
<PP&E>                                       1,206,649
<DEPRECIATION>                                 672,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,346,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          182,999
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,246
<OTHER-SE>                                     879,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,346,742
<SALES>                                        127,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               533,948
<CGS>                                           84,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  360,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,634
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,747
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,747
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL KENROY BELL, a/k/a Jamaica Mike,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:09-cr-00202-BO-2)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Kenroy Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Eleanor T. Morales, 

Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United States Attorneys, Shailika 

S. Kotiya, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Kenroy Bell appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bell, 

No. 5:09-cr-00202-BO-2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2015). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 13.3**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****COMPAÑÍA DE TELECOMUNICACIONES DE CHILE S.A.AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) of Compañía de Telecomunicaciones de Chile S.A. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof), I, Diego Martínez-Caro, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     ****(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

     ****(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

Date: April 13, 2007 

/s/ Diego Martínez-Caro De la Concha-Castañeda

Diego Martínez-Caro De la Concha-CastañedaChief Accounting Officer 

----
EXHIBIT 11
DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 30, 1999
AND JANUARY 31, 1998


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       Three Months Ended                Six Months Ended
                                        January 30, 1999                 January 30, 1999                 
                                 -------------------------------- ---------------------------------
                                                          Per                               Per 
                                                         Share                             Share
                                 Net Income      Shares  Amount   Net Income      Shares   Amount
                                 ----------      ------  ------   ----------      ------   ------

<S>                              <C>           <C>         <C>    <C>           <C>         <C>
Basic Earnings Per Share:

Income available to common
       shareholders              $1,604,444    7,648,308   $.21   $3,033,531    7,648,361   $.40
                                                           ====                             ==== 


Effect of Dilutive Securities:

Warrants                                          15,881                           14,177

Options                                          541,411                          511,540
                                 ----------   ----------          ----------   ----------       

Diluted Earnings Per Share       $1,604,444    8,205,600   $.20   $3,033,531    8,174,078   $.37
                                 ==========   ==========   ====   ==========   ==========   ====



                                       Three Months Ended                Six Months Ended
                                        January 31, 1998                 January 31, 1998                 
                                 -------------------------------- ---------------------------------
                                                          Per                               Per 
                                                         Share                             Share
                                 Net Income      Shares  Amount   Net Income      Shares   Amount
                                 ----------      ------  ------   ----------      ------   ------
Basic Earnings Per Share:

Income available to common
       shareholders              $1,362,480    7,472,140   $.18   $2,619,467    7,455,775   $.35
                                                           ====                             ====


Effect of Dilutive Securities:

Warrants                                          17,938                           19,718

Options                                          682,207                          696,649
                                 ----------   ----------          ----------   ----------       

Diluted Earnings Per Share       $1,362,480    8,172,285   $.17   $2,619,467    8,172,142   $.32
                                 ==========   ==========   ====   ==========   ==========   ====
</TABLE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 13

- 13713 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:13

- cr - 00034

- RV

- 7

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus SHAWN M. KING, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida

________________________ (June 12, 2014) Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM : Sharon K. Wilson, appointed counsel for Shawn M. King in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

Case: 13-13713 Date Filed: 06/12/2014 Page: 1 of 22 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel ’ s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel ’ s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Mathenia’ s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED

.

Case: 13-13713 Date Filed: 06/12/2014 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7097 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7097

To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States to implement 
  an exchange program for certain Federal funds for subrecipients of 
                highway funding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2020

Ms. Finkenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to authorize States to implement 
  an exchange program for certain Federal funds for subrecipients of 
                highway funding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Swaps, Protect Local Jobs 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT APPROVAL AND OVERSIGHT.

    Section 106(g) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
            ``(6) Federal funding exchange programs.--A State may 
        implement a program under which a subrecipient has the option 
        to exchange Federal funds allocated to such subrecipient in 
        accordance with the requirements of this title for State or 
        local funds if the State certifies to the Secretary that the 
        State has prevailing wage and domestic content requirements 
        that are comparable to the requirements under section 113 and 
        313 and that such requirements shall apply to projects carried 
        out using such funds if such projects would have been subject 
        to the requirements of sections 113 and 313 if such projects 
        were carried out using Federal funds.''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

December 6, 2013 
 Steve Filton 
 Senior Vice President & CFO 

UHS of Delaware, Inc. 
 367 South Gulph Road

 King of Prussia, PA 19406 
 Dear
Steve; 
 The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust (“UHT”), at today’s meeting, authorized
the renewal of the current Advisory Agreement between UHT and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (the “Agreement”) upon the same terms and conditions. 
 This letter constitutes UHT’s offer to renew the Agreement through December 31, 2014, upon the terms and conditions. Please acknowledge UHS of Delaware, Inc.’s acceptance of this offer by
signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me. Thank you. 
 Sincerely,

 /s/ Cheryl K. Ramagano 

Cheryl K. Ramagano 
 Vice President and Treasurer 
 Universal Health Realty Income
Trust 
 Agreed and Accepted: 

UHS OF DELAWARE, INC. 
 By: /s/ Steve Filton  
 Steve Filton 

Senior Vice President and CFO 
 cc: Charles Boyle
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

JULIAN GONZALEZ,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No: 7:11-CR-696-1

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Julian Gonzalez appealed his sentence following his conviction for 

receiving child pornography in interstate commerce under 18 U.S.C. 

§§ 2252A(a)(2)(A), 2252A(b)(1), and 2256. In an earlier opinion, we affirmed 

the district court’s judgment sentencing Gonzalez to 91 months of 

imprisonment and ordering lifetime supervised release, a special assessment 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 6, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 12-40003 Document: 00512724488 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/06/2014
No. 12-40003

of $100, and restitution of $926,560.09.1 In affirming the restitution order, we 

relied on this court’s en banc decision in In re Amy Unknown,2 which held that 

proof of proximate cause is required for restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259 only 

for “other losses” under § 2259(b)(3)(F), and that no showing of proximate cause 

is required for restitution for the costs enumerated in § 2259(b)(3)(A) through 

(E).3

In Paroline v. United States,4 the Supreme Court vacated this court’s 

judgment in In re Amy Unknown and held that “the proximate-cause 

requirement applies to all the losses described in § 2259.”5 On July 28, 2014, 

the Supreme Court vacated our judgment in this case and remanded for further 

consideration in light of Paroline.6 We remand to the district court in order to 

ascertain the extent of the victim’s losses under § 2259 in accordance with 

Paroline.

* * *

We REMAND the case to the district court for reconsideration in light of 

Paroline.

1 United States v. Gonzalez, 540 F. App’x 465, 466 (5th Cir. 2013) (unpublished), 

vacated by 134 S. Ct. 2847.

2 701 F.3d 749 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc), vacated by Paroline v. United States, 134 S. 

Ct. 1710 (2014) and Wright v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1933 (2014).

3 Gonzalez, 540 F. App’x at 471-72 (citing In re Amy Unknown, 701 F.3d at 773).

4 134 S. Ct. 1710 (2014).

5 Paroline, 134 S. Ct. at 1722, 1730.

6 Gonzalez v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2847 (2014) (per curiam).

2

 

 Case: 12-40003 Document: 00512724488 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/06/2014
#### Richard CORLEY, Petitioner, v. COOPER DISTRIBUTORS OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 43059.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Cause dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6754-6755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Forest Service, intends to grant to Sonic Industries, Inc. 
of Hatboro, Pennsylvania, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent 5,396,799 
issued March 14, 1995, ``Method and Apparatus for In Situ Evaluation of 
Wooden Members''. Notice of Availability was published in the Federal 
Register on September 16, 1992.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 14, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: Janet I. Stockhausen, USDA Forest Service, 
One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 53705-2398.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Janet I. Stockhausen of the USDA Forest Service at the Madison address 
given above; telephone: 608-231-9502.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the Untied States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Sonic Industries, Inc. has 
submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The 
prospective license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the 
terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective 
license may

[[Page 6755]]

be granted unless, within sixty days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Forest Service receives written evidence and argument which 
establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with 
the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Richard M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-3569 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-13-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                            ------------------------

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-99764 and File No.
33-41474) of our report dated February 18, 1997, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

New York, New York
March 27, 1997
#### ODDEE SMITH & SONS, INC. v. Eugene R. STOREY.

No. 50684.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 20, 1978.

Richard E. Stratton, III, Brookhaven, for appellant.

K. Maxwell Graves, Jr., Meadville, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Franklin County; Lenox L. Forman, Judge.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED.