alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DRAFT – Front PanelBack PanelPRODUCT NAMEInsect RepellentKEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDRENOptionalFirst Aid1If Swallowed__________________________If Inhaled______________________________If on Skin______________________________If in Eyes____________________________Reminder to have label. Emergency phone number.Note to Physician:Listing of ACTIVE INGREDIENT(S):....................................%(each ai with a specific percent)Listing of OTHER INGREDIENT(S).................................TOTAL:.............................................................100.00%EPA Tracking No.Company # - 25000X[Producer Name]EPA Establishment No. ____[Address][Telephone Number]Net Contents_________Precautions when using insect repellents:Repellents should be applied only toexposed skin and/or clothing (asdirected on the product label). Do not use under clothing.Never use repellents over cuts,wounds, or irritated skin.Do not apply near eyes and mouth, and apply sparingly around ears.Do not allow children to handle this product, and do not apply to children’shands. When using on children, apply toyour own hands and then put it onthe child or child’s clothing.Use just enough repellent to cover exposed skin and/or clothing. Heavyapplication and saturation is unnecessaryfor effectiveness; if biting insectsdo not respond to a thin film of repellent, reapply when necessary.After returning indoors, wash treated skin with soap and water or bathe.This is particularly important when repellents are used repeatedly in a dayor on consecutive days. Also, wash treated clothing before wearing it again.For spray products:When using sprays, do not spray directlyinto face; spray on hands first andthen apply to face. Do not apply neareyes and mouth, and apply sparinglyaround ears.Do not spray in enclosed areas. Avoid breathing a spray product, and do notuse it near food.______________________DIRECTIONSFORUSEIt is a violation of Federal law to use this product in amanner inconsistent with its labeling.DIRECTIONS for USE(continued)OptionalPHYSICAL OR CHEMICALHAZARDSSTORAGE AND DISPOSALPESTICIDE STORAGEPESTICIDE DISPOSALCONTAINER DISPOSALWARRANTY STATEMENT______________________________________________________________________________
#### Lester A. LAZAR, and Employers Fire Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Charles BELL, as father of Palmer Ann Bell, a minor, Deceased, and as husband of Betty Marie Bell, Appellee. Dr. Victor MORALES et al., Appellants, v. Charles BELL, as father of Palmer Ann Bell, a minor, Deceased, and as husband of Betty Marie Bell, Appellee. Charles BELL, as father of Palmer Ann Bell, a minor, Deceased, and as husband of Betty Marie Bell, Appellant, v. PALMETTO GENERAL HOSPITAL, INC., and Argonaut Insurance Company, Appellees.

Nos. 72-1518, 73-3 and 73-15.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Terry L. Collins, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argon ST, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: February 8, 2007   /s/ Terry L. Collins Terry L. Collins
Exhibit
4.73


 


Summary
of the Private Instrument of First Amendment to Regulation of Rights and Obligations, entered into on September 1, 2021, in connection
with Fazenda Rio do Meio.


 


Parties:
Agrifirma Agro Ltda. (formerly known as Agrifirma Brasil S.A), as Rural Lessor; and Francisco Ferreira Camacho, as Rural Lessee.


 


Purpose: Amend
the Private Instrument of Regulation of Rights and Obligations executed in connection with the
Rural Lease Agreement of Fazenda Rio do Meio, entered between the abovementioned Parties on June 24, 2016, amended on March 23,
2017, in order to (i) release Francisco Ferreira Camacho’s financial obligations under the Rural Lease Agreement until June 30,
2021; (ii) consolidate the Rural Lease area in 2,917.33 hectares of Fazenda Rio do Meio; and (iii) increase the minimum cattle occupation
by up to 2 oxen/cows per hectare.
SW-846 Update V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS - 1 Revision 1 

 October 2012 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

The Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR) thanks the following 

organizations and groups, whose individual’s efforts, assistance and advice in the preparation 

of this manual were invaluable: 

 U.S. E.P.A. Regions I - X 

 U.S. E.P.A./ORCR Staff 

 U.S. E.P.A. SW-846 Work Groups 

 All Method Development Chemists/Teams 

 The Cadmus Group, Inc. 

 Commercial Scientific Firms, both Laboratory and Instrument 

Manufacturers 

 Department of Defense 

 Laboratory Technical Information Group (LTIG) 

 National Enforcement Investigation Center (NEIC) 

 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 

 Office of Research and Development (ORD) 

 Participating Universities 

 Research Triangle Park (RTP) 

 State Regulatory Agencies
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Aaron N. Daniels, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Argon ST, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: February 8, 2008/s/ Aaron N. Daniels
#### James W. SMART, etc., et al., Appellants, v. LAKE JESSAMINE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-323.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 30, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Thomas E. Kirkland, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7086]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[STB Docket No. AB-441 (Sub-No. 2X)]


SWKR Operating Co; Abandonment Exemption; in Cochise County, AZ

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempts SWKR Operating 
Co. from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 to abandon 
the stub-end of its Douglas Branch, subject to historic preservation, 
trail use, public use, and standard labor protective conditions. The 
line extends between milepost 1055.8 near Charleston and the end of the 
line at milepost 1097.3, near Paul Spur, a distance of 41.5 miles, in 
Cochise County, AZ.

DATES: Provided no formal expression of intent to file a financial 
assistance offer has been received, this exemption will be effective on 
March 16, 1997. Formal expressions of intent to file financial 
assistance offers under 49 CFR 1152.27(c)(2) <SUP>1 and additional 
requests for interim trail use/rail banking under 49 CFR 1152.29 must 
be filed by February 24, 1997. Petitions to stay must be filed by March 
3, 1997. Additional requests for a public use condition in conformity 
with 49 CFR 1152.28(a)(2) must be filed by March 6, 1997. Petitions to 
reopen must be filed by March 11, 1997.

    \1\  See Exempt. of Rail Abandonment--Offers of Finan. Assist., 
4 I.C.C.2d 164 (1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADDRESSES: Send pleadings referring to STB Docket No.
    AB-441 (Sub-No. 2X) to: (1) Office of the Secretary, Case Control 
Branch, Surface Transportation Board, 1201 Constitution Avenue, N.W., 
Washington, DC 20423; and (2) Petitioner's representative: Joseph D. 
Anthofer, 1416 Dodge Street, Room 830, Omaha, NE 68179-0830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph H. Dettmar, (202) 927-5660. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 927-5721.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: DC News & Data, Inc., Room 2229, 1201 
Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. Telephone: (202) 289-
4357/4359. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through 
TDD services (202) 927-5721.]

    Decided: February 7, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3798 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
#### FIRST FLORIDA UTILITIES, INC., Petitioner, v. William T. MAYO, Jerry W. Carter and Jess Yarborough, as and constituting the Florida Public Service Commission, Respondents.

No. 38823.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 28, 1970.

B. Kenneth Gatlin of Parker, Foster & Madigan, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

R. M. C. Rose, Tallahassee, for Florida Public Service Commission, respondents.

Gregory A. Presnell, of Akerman, Sen-terfitt, Eidson, Mesmer, Robbinson & Wharton, Orlando, for intervenor respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to the Florida Public Service Commission to review Order No. 4694, dated June 12, 1969. The order in question denied petitioner’s application to increase its rates and charges.

Our consideration of the petition, record, briefs and argument of counsel leads us to conclude that the Commission did not err in determining the rate base with May 1, 1961, as the date of valuation and that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

Each of the undersigned, in his or her capacity as an officer of CubicCorporation hereby certifies that:

 

1.               The report of Cubic Corporation (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”), whichaccompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of theRegistrant at the end of such quarter and the results of operations of theRegistrant for such quarter.

 

 
| /s/ W. J. Zable           |                    | /s/ W.W. Boyle |   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|----------------|--------|
| W. J. Zable               | W. W. Boyle             |
| Chief Executive Officer   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |                    |
| Date: August 8, 2005 |                    |

 

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A2083. IN THE INTEREST OF V. F. E. B. et al., CHILDREN (MOTHER).

The mother of V. F. E. B., M. J. C. J., and H. T. J. J. filed this direct appeal

from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights. Pursuant to OCGA §

5-6-35 (a) (12); however, appeals from orders terminating parental rights must be

made by filing an application for discretionary review. See In the Interest of K. R.,

285 Ga. 155 (674 SE2d 288) (2009). The mother’s failure to file an application for

discretionary review deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 02, 2018

08/02/2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
 

In the Matter of 

POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
 

Respondent. 

)

)

)

)

)

)
 

Docket No. 9327 

ORDER ON NON-PARTY JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.'S
 

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME IN WHICH TO MOVE TO LIMIT
 

OR QUASH SUBPOENA SERVED BY RESPONDENT
 

On November 20, 2008, non-party Johnson Controls, Inc. filed a motion to extend the 

time in which to move to limit the subpoena served on it by Respondent, Polypore International, 

Inc. until December 4,2008. Johnson Controls submitted a stipulation wherein Respondent has 

agreed to the request for an extension oftime. Johnson Controls further represents that 

Complaint Counsel takes no position on the motion. 

Johnson Controls' motion is GRANTED. It is hereby ORDERED that the time in which 

Johnson Controls may respond to the subpoena, including by means of a motion to limit or 

quash, is extended to December 4,2008. 

ORDERED:
 

Administrative Law Judge
 

Date: November 20, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice #2673]


Determination on USAID Bilateral Assistance to the Republika 
Srpska

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 573(e) of the 
Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 1998 (``FOAA,'' Pub. L. 105-118), I hereby waive 
the application of section 573(a) of the FOAA with regard to USAID-
funded programs in the Republika Srpska.
    I hereby determine that USAID's Municipal Infrastructure and 
Services Program, Bosnia Business Development Program, Economic Reform 
Program and Democratic Reform Program directly support the 
implementation of the Dayton Agreement and its Annexes.
    This Determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 15, 1997.
Strobe Talbott,
Acting, Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 97-34183 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6651

WARREN FLETCHER-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner; FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-4088-WMN) Submitted: October 21, 1999 Decided: October 27, 1999 Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Fletcher-El, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief onhis 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fletcher-El v. Lanham , No. CA-98-4088-WMN (D. Md. Apr. 30, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

 

)

In the Matter of )

)

UNIVERSAL COMPUTERS AND )

 ELECTRONICS, INC., )

d/b/a Appliancebestbuys.com, and, ) DOCKET NO. 9347

d/b/a universallcdtv.com, )

 Respondent. ) PUBLIC DOCUMENT

)

 )

ORDER WITHDRAWING MATTER FROM ADJUDICATION FOR THE

PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING A PROPOSED CONSENT AGREEMENT

Complaint Counsel and Respondents having jointly moved that this matter be withdrawn

from adjudication to enable the Commission to consider a proposed Consent Agreement; and

Complaint Counsel and Respondents having submitted a proposed Consent Agreement

containing a proposed Order, executed by the Respondents and by Complaint Counsel and

approved by the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection which, if accepted by the

Commission, would resolve this matter in its entirety;

IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.25(c) of the Commission Rules of Practice,

16 C. F.R. § 3.25(c) (2011), that this matter in its entirety be, and it hereby is, withdrawn from

adjudication, and that all proceedings before the Administrative Law Judge be, and they hereby

are, stayed pending a determination by the Commission with respect to the proposed Consent

Agreement, pursuant to Rule 3.25(f), 16 C. F.R. § 3.25(f); and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 3.25(b) of the Commission Rules of

Practice, 16 C.F.R. § 3.25(b), that the proposed Consent Agreement shall not be placed on the

public record unless and until it is accepted by the Commission.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

Issued: August 4, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34063]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Announcement of Import Restraint Limits for Certain Cotton, Wool 
and Man-Made Fiber Textiles and Textile Products and Silk Blend and 
Other Vegetable Fiber Apparel Produced or Manufactured in the 
Philippines; Correction

December 23, 1997.
    In the first column on page 64362 of the document published in the 
Federal Register on December 5, 1997, make the following corrections:
    1. Move Categories 361, 369-S and 611 from Group II to Group I. The 
limits for Categories 361, 369-S and 611 remain unchanged.
    2. The new Group II designation shall be as follows:
    200-227, 300-326, 332, 359-O, 360, 362, 363, 369-O, 400-414, 434-
438, 440, 442, 444, 448, 459pt., 464, 469pt., 600-607, 613-629, 644, 
659-O, 666, 669-O, 670-O, 831, 833-838, 840-846, 850-858 and 859pt., as 
a group
    3. Change the 1998 Group II limit from 189,927,480 square meters 
equivalent to 170,236,390 square meters equivalent.
J. Hayden Boyd,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile 
Agreements.
[FR Doc. 97-34063 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F