alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3565]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 1997 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 6739]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

7 CFR Part 354

[Docket No.96-038-2]
RIN 0579-AA81

User Fees; Agricultural Quarantine and Inspection Services; 
Correction

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects several typographical errors in the 
preamble to a proposed rule published in the Federal Register on 
January 27, 1997 (62 FR 3823-3830, Docket No. 96-038-1), regarding user 
fees for agricultural quarantine and inspection services.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information concerning program 
operations, contact Mr. Jim Smith, Operations Officer, Program Support, 
PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 60, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236, (301) 
734-8295. For information concerning rate development, contact Ms. 
Donna Ford, PPQ User Fees Section Head, FSSB, BAD, APHIS, 4700 River 
Road Unit 54, Riverdale, MD 20737-1232, (301) 734-5901.
Correction
    In proposed rule FR Doc. 97-1892, beginning on page 3823 in the 
Federal Register of January 27, 1997, make the following corrections, 
in the Supplementary Information section. On page 3825, third column, 
in the sixth line, remove ``FY 1997-20020'', and add ``FY 1997-2002'' 
in its place. On page 3826, in the tables headed ``PROPOSED AQI USER 
FEE RATES--FY 1998'' and ``PROPOSED AQI USER FEE RATES--FY 2001'', in 
the lines for ``Commercial trucks'', remove references to footnote 
``1'', and add references to footnote ``2'' in its place. On page 3827, 
in the table headed ``AGRICULTURAL QUARANTINE INSPECTION (AQI) USER 
FEES--Continued'', under the column headed ``FY98'', remove ``5.75'', 
and add ``59.75'' in its place.

    Done in Washington, DC, this 6th day of February 1997.
Richard R. Kelly,
Acting Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Development, Animal and Plant 
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 97-3565 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board
[STB ex Parte No. 558 (Sub-No. 1)]


Railroad Cost of Capital--1997

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroads' 1997 cost of capital.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board is instituting a proceeding to determine the 
railroad industry's cost of capital for 1997. The decision solicits 
comments on: (1) the railroads' 1997 cost of debt capital; (2) the 
railroads' 1997 current cost of preferred stock equity capital; (3) the 
railroads' 1997 cost of common stock equity capital; and (4) the 1997 
capital structure mix of the railroad industry on a market value basis.

DATES: Notices of intent to participate are due no later than December 
30, 1997. A service list will then be prepared and issued by January 
14, 1998. Statements of the railroads are due by March 20, 1998. 
Statements of other interested persons are due by April 10, 1998. 
Rebuttal statements by the railroads are due by April 24, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send an original and 10 copies of statements and a copy of 
the statement on a 3.5 inch disk in WordPerfect 6.1, and an original 
and 1 copy of the notice of intent to participate to: Surface 
Transportation Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 
1925 K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20423.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard J. Blistein, (202) 565-1529. 
[TDD for the hearing impaired: (202) 565-1695.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To obtain a copy of the full decision, write to, 
call, or pick up in person from: Office of the Secretary, Surface 
Transportation Board, 1925 K Street, N.W., Room 700, Washington, DC 
20423. Telephone: (202) 565-1650. [Assistance for the hearing impaired 
is available through TDD services (202) 565-1695.] A copy of the 
decision can also be obtained from the Board's internet site 
(www.stb.dot.gov).
    We preliminarily conclude that the proposed action will not 
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the 
conservation of energy resources.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 10704(a).

    Decided: December 5, 1997.

    By the Board, Chairman Morgan and Vice Chairman Owen.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32778 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Public Statements Tagged with Appliances No results found for this tag.
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

ASGLARADE COttag
} AS reonwven vocunests OY,
, EF 28 2002

\ SECRETAEL

In the Matter of

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V.
a foreign corporation,

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, DOCKET NO. 9300

a corporation, and

PITT-DES MOINES, INC.,
a corporation.

Serre rrr UY

ORDER ON APPLICATION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS

On October 23, 2002, Complaint Counsel, pursuant to Rule 3.34(a)(2) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice, filed an application for the issuance of 24 subpoenas
commanding persons to attend and give testimony at the adjudicative hearing in this matter.
According to Complaint Counsel’s final witness list, which provides a brief description of the
intended testimony of each individual, the testimony sought appears to be reasonably relevant.
Complaint Counsel has not represented whether the individuals are located in the United States.

The application is GRANTED, with the limitation that subpoenas for individuals located
outside the United States will not be issued unless the requirements of Rule 3.36 are met. This
Order does not constitute a ruling on the admissibility of testimony from the witnesses.
Complaint Counsel shall prepare the subpoenas for my signature and arrange an appropriate time
to pick up the signed subpoenas.

ORDERED: Dn gocpeutl —
D. Michael Chapp:

Administrative Law Judge
Date: October 28, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board of Directors


Cyberonics, Inc.:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-163219, 333-125401, 333-108281, 333-56694 and 333-66691) on Forms S-8 of Cyberonics, Inc. of our reports dated June 17, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Cyberonics, Inc. as of April 30, 2010 and April 24, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the 53 weeks ended April 30, 2010, and for the 52 weeks ended April 24, 2009 and April 25, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2010, which reports appear in the April 30, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Cyberonics, Inc.







/s/ KPMG LLP


Houston, Texas


June 17, 2010
#### Ricardo VALDEZ-ROBLES, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-70052.

INS No. [ A XX XXX XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*811MEMORANDUM **

Ricardo Valdez-Robles, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252,1 and we deny the petition.

The BIA’s determination that an alien is not eligible for asylum must be upheld if it is “ ‘supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.’ ” *INS v. Elias-Zaca-rias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (citation omitted). “It can be reversed only if the evidence presented ... was such that a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude that the requisite fear of persecution existed.” *Id.*When an alien seeks to overturn the BIA’s adverse determination, “he must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *Id.*at 483-84; *see also Cordon-Garcia v. INS,*204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000); *Ghaly v. INS,*58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir.1995).

Where an asylum claim is involved, an alien must show either past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution that is “both subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable.” *Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 960 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc). Additionally, the claimed persecution must be on account of one of the grounds set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A). *See id.*at 962.

While Valdez-Robles may have shown that the guerrillas used violence and threats in attempting to forcibly recruit him, the evidence does not compel the conclusion that he was persecuted on account of his political opinion, if any. *See Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. at 482-83; *Molina-Morales v. INS,*237 F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th Cir.2001); *Cruz-Navarro v. INS,*232 F.3d 1024, 1029-30 (9th Cir.2000). Nor was any persecution that was directed at him on account of his membership in a particular social group. *See Cruz-Navarro,*232 F.3d at 1029; *Arriaga-Barrientos v. INS,*937 F.2d 411, 414 (9th Cir.1991).

Petition DENIED.2

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as 9th Cir. R. 36-3 may provide.

1

. Valdez-Robles was placed into administrative proceedings after April 1, 1997. *See Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1149-50 (9th Cir. 1997).

2

. Because Valdez-Robles did not meet the eligibility requirements for asylum, he was not entitled to withholding of deportation either. *See Ghaly,*58 F.3d at 1429.
#### Moses BROOKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-803.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 4, 1973.

Moses Brooker, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings, we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
#### Michael DuMEZ, a minor and Gina DuMez, Appellants, v. Michael L. LEARY, a minor, By and Through his next friend, Robert F. Leary, and Progressive Mutual Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 71-1071.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; George Richardson, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Mary FATOLITIS, Appellant, v. John G. FATOLITIS, Appellee.

No. 72-710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 14, 1973.

John R. Parkhill, Tampa, for appellant.

Harold S. Wilson, Clearwater, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of a lower court comes here with a presumption of correctness, and the burden is on the appellant to establish reversible error. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Baynard, Fla.1933, 112 Fla. 544, 151 So. 5; Mercier v. Mercier, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 204; Fishman v. Fishman, Fla.App.1971, 245 So.2d 258. Upon careful consideration of the record on appeal and briefs of the parties, we find that the appellant has been unable to carry this burden.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., McNULTY, J., and PIERCE, J., (Ret.), concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 12

                              Dean Foods Company
              Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  13 Weeks Ended
                                  August 25, 1996
                                  ---------------
<S>                                   <C>
Income before taxes                    $30,102
                                      ---------
Fixed charges:
        Interest expense                 6,249
        Portion of rentals (33%)         2,535
                                      ---------
        Total fixed charges              8,784

Earnings before taxes and
        fixed charges                  $38,886
                                      =========
Ratio of earnings to
        fixed charges                      4.4
                                      =========

</TABLE>


                                       11
#### John J. McCLAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-703.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Norman J. Kapner, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Frank B. Kessler, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WALDEN, Judge.

Defendant was tried by jury, convicted and sentenced to two and one-half years imprisonment for possession of marijuana, *286contrary to the provisions of Section 404.-15(1), F.S.1971, F.S.A. This offense is a felony. He now appeals upon the premise that the trial court erred in refusing to give the defendant’s requested instruction of the lesser included offense of attempt to possess marijuana, such attempt being a misdemeanor.

We reverse upon authority of Ward v. State, Fla.App.1973, 287 So.2d 138, Opinion filed December 21, 1973. We remand with respectful instructions that, upon the State’s election, the defendant be sentenced for a misdemeanor under the provisions of Section 776.04(3), F.S.1971, F.S.A., or in the alternative he granted a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

DOWNEY, J., and COWART, JOE A, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.
2013.12.31 EX 10.11






EXHIBIT 10.11


Summary Description of 
Named Executive Officer Compensation


On February 20, 2014, the Management and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (the Company) approved increases in annual base salary levels for certain of the Company’s current officers who were identified as named executive officers in the Company’s 2012 proxy statement. It is expected that such increases will be made effective on or about April 1, 2014:
	
				
	Named Executive Officer
	Title
	Prior Base Salary
	Increased Base Salary

	Stuart M. Brightman
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	$602,000
	$625,000

	Elijio V. Serrano
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$392,000
	$411,600

	Edwin H. Goldman
	Senior Vice President
	$370,000
	$384,800

	Peter J. Pintar
	Senior Vice President Corp. Strategy and Development
	$356,000
	$370,240






Each of the above named executive officers has entered into an employment agreement in a form substantially identical to the form of agreement executed by all of TETRA’s employees. Each agreement evidences the at-will nature of employment and does not set forth or guarantee the term of employment, salary, or other incentives, all of which are entirely at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Each named executive officer is eligible to participate in TETRA’s incentive programs generally available to its salaried employees, including health, life, disability and other insurance and benefits, 401(k) Plan, Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, and vacation, paid sick leave, and other employee benefits.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Settlement Pursuant To The Safe Drinking 
Water Act

    In accordance with Department policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 
given that on December 4, 1997, a proposed Consent Decree in United 
States v. Gas Transportation Corporation, (N.D.FLA.) (Civil No. 
3:97CV519/LAC), was lodged with the U.S. District Court for the 
Northern District of Florida. The United States filed its complaint in 
this action simultaneously with the consent decree, on behalf of the 
Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'') pursuant to provisions of the 
Safe Drinking Act (``SDWA''), 42 U.S.C. 300h-2(b), and its implementing 
regulations at 40 CFR part 144. The complaint seeks injunctive relief 
and civil penalties for violations of the SDWA. Gas Transportation 
Corporation (``GTC'') owned and operated the ``Finley Heirs'' well, a 
Type II injection well located in Santa Rosa County, Florida, for the 
disposal of saltwater brine generated as an incident of its oil 
production. The United States has alleged that GTC's improper operation 
of the injection well allowed for the movement of contaminants into an 
underground source of drinking water in violation of the Underground 
Injection Control (``UIC'') regulations, its UIC permit and a 
previously issued Administration Order on Consent (``AOC''). Under the 
proposed settlement, GTC will pay $113,700 in civil penalties based on 
its limited financial ability, in resolution of the United States' 
claims as set forth in the complaint.
    The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication comments concerning the proposed 
consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney 
General of the Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to 
United States v. Gas Transportation Corporation, D.J. ref. 90-5-1-1-
4388.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida, 114 East 
Gregory Street, Pensacola, Florida 32501 and at the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G. Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005. A 
copy of the proposed decree may be obtained in person or by mail from 
the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G. Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20005. In requesting a copy, please enclose a check in the amount of 
$3.25 ($.025 per page for reproduction costs) payable to: Consent 
Decree Library.
Joel Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-33823 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE> 35

                                                            Exhibit 32


                            Certifications


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005 of American General Finance Corporation as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of, Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
           amended; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results
           of operations of the Company.



                                 /s/  Frederick W. Geissinger
                                      Frederick W. Geissinger
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer


                                 /s/  Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.
                                      Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.
                                 Senior Vice President and
                                   Chief Financial Officer


Date:  May 5, 2005
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH , Appellant,

v.

MATTHEW LADD , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3597

[ January 17, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2015

- CA

002487

- XXXX

- MB AA

.
Anthony Stella and Zo ë Panarites, Assistant City Attorneys, City Attorney Office, City of West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Isidro M. Garcia of Garcia Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, fo r appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

G ROSS , M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.