From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Gabrielle Stevens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/07/2012 12:41 PM Subject: Emails in relation to EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule John -- second set of emails for the docket Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202-343-9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/26/2012 09:27 AM Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal -to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Thanks, Jeb. We'll forward to reviewers. On the changes since proposal, it would be great to get something like the Excel summary table we got at NPRM. You have something similar in the TSD, but if EPA cou ld add the CSAPR final rule budgets for the states in both the FR and DFR as well as the NPRM amendment budgets as well for the FR so that we can see the incremental changes relative to both CSAPR FR and the NPRM, that'd be great. Have a great day, Chris tine

----- Original Message ----- From: Jeb Stenhouse [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 5:17 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Richard Haeuber Subject: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rul e Hi Christine, Per our discussion at today's meeting, I've attached the comment letters related to each of the post - proposal changes explained in the preamble to the final revisions rule. For each letter, I've identified the relevant pages of the preamble that explain the change. Pages 14 - 15 of the preamble (See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4822.pdf) Page 22 of the preamble (See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4803.pdf)Pages 29 - 31 of the preamble (See attached file:

EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4792.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4863.pdf) Sincerely, Jeb Stenhouse Chief, Program Development Branch Clean Air Markets Division Environmental Protection Agency 202 - 343 - 9781 stenhouse.jeb@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USE PA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/01/2012 03:13 PM Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules 

### Rick and Jeb, Attached please find interagency comments for the 2 CSAPR rules. Speak with you soon, Christine EO1356312866Interagencycomments1_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc EO1356312866Interagencycomments2_CSAPR_Revisions_Part_II_2060-AR35.doc EO1356312866Interagencycomments3 Final Revisions Rule Significant Contribution Assessment TSD.doc

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/01/2012 02:08 PM Subject: FW : EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules 

### Second try **From:** Kymn, Christine J. **Sent:** Wednesday, February 01, 2012 12:13 PM **To:** Richard Haeuber (Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov); Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov **Subject:** EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules 

### Rick and Jeb, Attached please find interagency comments fo r the 2 CSAPR rules.

### Speak with you soon,

Christine EO1356312866Interagencycomments1_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc EO1356312866Interagencycomments2_CSAPR_Revisions_Part_II_2060-AR35.doc EO1356312866Interagencycomments3 Final Revisions Rule Significant Contribution Assessment TSD.doc

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/01/2012 02:58 PM Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal -to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Hi Rick, Yes still on. For tomorrow's call are your folks at all available before 1pm? 1:30 - 230 doesn't work. Thanks!

----- Original Message ----- From: Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 10:07 AM To: Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov Cc: Kymn, Christine J.; Stenhouse.Jeb@epama il.epa.gov Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Christine -- just wanted to double - check and confirm that we are on for 4 PM today. Thanks Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber .richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 01/31/201 2 05:48 PM Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR

revisions ruleChristine --- talking with here, 4 PM works best for us. So, the call - in

number and passcode are: 866 - 299 - 3188 202 - 343 - 9250 Let me know if anyth ing changes. Look forward to talking with you Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeube r/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/01/2012 03:49 PM Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal -to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

OK - the ask was for before 1pm actually

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:10 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subj ect: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Christine -- not sure about 1 PM tomorrow for the relevant folks. They will be on the call -- can we poll them at that point and adjust the schedule for tomorrow accordingly? Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From : "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPADate: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal -to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule I've put a feeler o ut and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is on. Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call! Thanks, Christine

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto :Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Christine --- How about 11 - 12 tomorrow? I've sent a s cheduler to folks here, though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us. Same call - in numbers 866 - 299 - 3188 202 - 343 - 9250 Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/ EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@ EPA Date: 02/02/2012 02:01 PM Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal -to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Hi Rick Just left you a vm. Can't do now ...

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:49 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule In case you all can call in, here's a numberSorry I didn't include call - in info initial ly -- we'll use 866 - 299 - 3188;

code 202 - 343 - 9193 Richard Haeuber Sent by EPA Wireless E - Mail Services

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov] Sent: 02/02/2012 02:23 PM GMT To: Richard Haeuber Cc: Jeb Stenho use Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Rick and Jeb, Looks like we're on for 11am. Do you have a call - in or shall we get one? Thx! Christine

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Hae uber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 09:08 AM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov> Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Good morning --- any word on whether 11 AM will work? Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb .eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR

revisions rule I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is on. Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call! Thanks, Christine

----- Original Message -----From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail. epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Christine --- How about 11 - 12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, th ough I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us. Same call - in numbers 866 - 299 - 3188 202 - 343 - 9250 Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.f acebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/02/2012 03:34 PM Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal -to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Hi Rick, Am on a call through 430 or 5. do you want to try to touch base around then?

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard @epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 01:49 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov> Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule In case you all can call in, here's a number Sorry I didn't include call - in info initially -- we'll use 866 - 299 - 3188; code 202 - 343 - 9193 Richard Haeuber Sent by EPA Wireless E - Mail Services

----- Original Message ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov] Sent: 02/02/2 012 02:23 PM GMTTo: Richard Haeuber

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Rick and Jeb, Looks like we're on for 11am. Do you have a call - in or shall we get one? Thx! Christine

----- Origi nal Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 09:08 AM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov> Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Good morning --- any word on whether 11 AM will work? Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR

revisions r ule I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is on. Feel bad enough about obliging him to today's call! Thanks, Christine

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal - to - final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Christine --- How about 11 - 1 2 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folkshere, though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call - in numbers 866 - 299 - 3188 202 - 343 - 9250 Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 925 0 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 01:02 PM Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal -to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule Rick, We have a few follow up interagency comments. Pretty benign. I will forward very shortly. Thanks, Christine

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 11:50 AM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov> Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal - to - fin al changes in CSAPR revisions rule Christine -- as we discussed, this got lost in the shuffle of the other conversation. Sorry about that. Attached are the comments you requested. (See attached file: EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4784 - A1.pdf)(See attached file: E PA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4782 - A1.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4752 - A1.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4752 - A4.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4752 - A2.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4752 - A3.pdf)(See attache d file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4818 - A3.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4818 - A1.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4818 - A2.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4800 - A1.pdf)(See attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4755 - A1.pdf)(Se e attached file: EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0491 - 4822 - A1.pdf)Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Hae uber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 01:32 PM Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Ame ndment Final Rule Rick and Jeb, Some additional comments on the rulemaking. These comments and page references are based on the original draft. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Christine BB: 202.631.6551

EO1356312866Interagencycomments4_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc.docx

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 01:35 PM Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule Apologies. Disregard this email. These are for a different rule!

----- Original Message ----- From: Kymn, Christine J. Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:32 PM To: 'Richard Haeuber' Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule Rick and Jeb, Some additional comments on the rulemaking. These comments and page references are based on the original draft. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Christine BB: 202.631.6551----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM -----

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 01:44 PM Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule Many apologies. They'll notice as soon as they open the file. Lotta balls in the air today.

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:37 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule already sent them....I'll call off the troops Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." < Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 02:18 PM Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

No additional comments thus far. Just what we have on the plate currently. Sorry again for any confusion!

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 02:02 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.ep a.gov> Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule that's what we figured -- and, yes, folks noticed quickly, resulting in several quizzical emails so, does this mean there were no additional comments? Or, should I still a nticipate an email from you?Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 01:44 PM Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment

Final Rule Many apologies. They'll notice as soon as they open the file. Lotta balls in the air today.

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:37 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule already sent them ....I'll call off the troops Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 02:56 PM Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Ru le Thanks, Rick. I will pass EPA's one pager along.

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:44 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb StenhouseSubject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine --- thanks for the clarification about the comments you sent inadvertently. I've attached a one - pager that provides some helpful detail on the changes to the budget for one state. I'll send another email in a little bit that provides some information on some of the assumptions we discussed recently. Hope this helps (See attached file: CSAPR Rev Rule TX SO2 Changes.docx) Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@ epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/03/2012 04:01 PM Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule Thanks, Rick. I will forward this info as well.

----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:23 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule Christine, As promised, here is some additional informa tion that, I hope, provides helpful detail in regard to our recent discussion on technology.

-- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on EIA form 860 which provides information on the capability (i.e., "design" parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, as opposed to actual historical performance data. At that time, we assumed that 100% of flue gas was treated at all scrubbers.

-- We responded to comments in the final rule and defended at that time that we should, as we did, use capability rather than actual performance data.

-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the concern raised by facilities in Texas that due to stack configurations 100% of the flue gas was not being treated by the scrubber, we deviated from the approach taken in the final CSAPR when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas bypass on one historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for the units in Texas.

-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC poi nting out the inconsistency with the approach used in the final CSAPR rule and suggestingwe use scrubber capability information on flue gas bypass that is included on

EIA form 860, consistent with what we did in the final rule, for the adjustment for thos e units.

-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in using the performance data from from the 2008 EIA form 923 for Texas in the revisions proposal, as opposed to scrubber capability from EIA form 860, and the correction of that mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber capability data from EIA form 860 in this final notice.

-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas and with the final CSAPR rule, we have also applied this approach in the direct final in re sponding to a comment we received in the CSAPR revisions proposal to address flue gas bypass for units in Indiana. Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http: //www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/06/201 2 02:44 PM Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule 

### I haven't heard any requests for additional info but will let you know stat if I do. I'm told Sarah called about these - is it the same question? Thx! **From** : Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] **Sent** : Monday, February 06, 2012 12:01 PM **To** : Kymn, Christine J. **Cc** : Jeb Stenhouse <Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov> **Subject** : Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule No, still waiting here as well. Just to securely close this loop - we got you everything you need other than that final discussion, right? Thanks Richard Haeuber Sent by EPA Wireless E-Mail Services

**From :**  "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop. gov] **Sent:** 02/06/2012 02:51 PM GMT **To:** Richard Haeuber**Cc:** Jeb Stenhouse

**Subject:** RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule 

### Hi Rick, Sorry I haven’t heard anything yet. Anything from your end? Teleworking again today so feel free to give me a ring on the BB (202.631.6551). Thanks, Christine **From:** Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] **Sent:** Monday, February 06, 2012 7:46 AM **To:** Kymn, Christine J. **Cc:** Jeb Stenhouse **Subject:** RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule Good morning Christine -- just checking in to see if we've made any progress. I'll be in the office shortly and look forward to hearing from you. Thanks Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (62 04J) Clean Air Markets Division haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- "Kymn, Christine J." < Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov > wrote: ----- To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Kymn, Christine J." < Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov > Date: 02/03/2012 04:01PM Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule 

### Thanks, Rick. I will forward this info as well.

----- Original Mess age ----- From: Richard Haeuber [ mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov ] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:23 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments: CSAPR Amendment Final Rule Christine, As promised, here is some additional information that, I hope, provides helpful detail in regard to our recent discussion on technology.

### -- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on

EIA form 860 wh ich provides information on the capability (i.e., "design" parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, as opposed to actual historical performance data. At that time, we assumed that 100% of flue gas was treated at all scrubbers.

-- We res ponded to comments in the final rule and defended at that time that we should, as we did, use capability rather than actual performance data.

-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the concern raised by facilities in Texas that due to stack configurations 100% of the flue gas was not being treated by the scrubber, we deviated from the approach taken in the final CSAPR when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas bypass on one historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for the units in Texas.

-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC pointing out the inconsistency with the approach used in the final CSAPR rule and suggesting we use scrubber capability information on flue gas bypass that is included on EIA f orm 860, consistent with what we did in the final rule, for the adjustment for those units.

-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in using the performance data from from the 2008 EIA form 923 for Texas in the revisions proposal, as opposed to scrubber capability from EIA form 860, and the correction of that mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber capability data from EIA form 860 in this final notice.

-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas and with the final CSAPR rule, we have also applied this approach in the direct final in responding to a comment we received in the CSAPR revisions proposal to address flue gas bypass for units in Indiana. Rick Haeuber, Ph.D. USEPA (6204J) Clean Air Markets Divis ion haeuber.richard@epa.gov 202 - 343 - 9250 http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/06/2012 06:01 PM Subject: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFRRick,

Could you get in touch with OP and have them upload a clean copy of the DFR (part II)? ROCIS is open for amendment. Thanks, Christine

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:39 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/06/2012 07:22 PM Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR Thanks, Jeb. Can you ask them to shoot me an email when it's in? Have a great evening, Christine

----- Original Message ----- From: Jeb Stenhouse [mailto:Stenhouse.Jeb@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 6:54 PM To: Kymn, Christine J.; Richa rd Haeuber Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR Hello Christine, Just wanted to send a note that we have notified OP and understand they will upload the clean direct final rule into ROCIS first thing tomorrow morning. Thanks, Jeb

-- --- Original Message ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." [Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov] Sent: 02/06/2012 11:01 PM GMT To: Richard Haeuber Cc: Jeb Stenhouse Subject: EO 13563 12866 Review CSAPR Amendment DFR Rick, Could you get in touch with OP and have th em upload a clean copy of the DFR (part II)? ROCIS is open for amendment. Thanks, Christine