alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34128]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0523]


Agency Information Collection Activities Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C., 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Veterans 
Benefits Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, has 
submitted the collection of information abstracted below to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA 
submission describes the nature of the information collection and its 
expected cost and burden; it includes the actual data collection 
instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 30, 1998.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR A COPY OF THE SUBMISSION CONTACT: Ron 
Taylor, Information Management Service (045A4), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-8015 
or FAX (202) 273-5981. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0523.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    Titles and Form Numbers: Loan Analysis, VA Form 26-6393.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0523.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired.
    Abstract: The form is completed by representatives of lending 
institutions to determine the veteran-borrower's ability to qualify for 
a VA guaranteed loan. The information is used by the VA as evidence of 
the lender's adherence to VA credit standards.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on October 24, 1996 at page 55187.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 120,000 hours.
    Estimated Total Average Burden Per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Number of Respondents: 240,000.
    Send comments and recommendations concerning any aspect of the 
information collection to VA's OMB Desk Officer, Allison Eydt, OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, DC 20503, (202) 395-4650. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0523'' in any correspondence.

    Dated: December 9, 1997.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Donald L. Neilson,
Director, Information Management Service.
[FR Doc. 97-34128 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 021197B]


Caribbean Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Caribbean Fishery Management Council (Council) and its 
Administrative Committee, the Scientific and Statistical Committee 
(SSC), the Advisory Panel (AP) and the Habitat Advisory Panel (HAP) 
will hold meetings.

DATES: The meetings will be held on March 18-20, 1997.

ADDRESSES: All meetings will be held at the Marriott's Frenchman's Reef 
Beach Resort, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caribbean Fishery Management Council, 
268 Munoz Rivera Avenue, Suite 1108, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00918-2577; 
telephone: (787) 766-5926.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will hold its 91st regular 
public meeting to discuss the Third Amendment to the Reeffish Fishery 
Management Plan (FMP) and the First Amendment to the Coral FMP, among 
other topics.
    The Administrative Committee will meet on Tuesday, March 18, 1997, 
from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., to discuss administrative matters 
regarding Council operation.
    The Council will convene on Wednesday, March 19, 1997, from 9:00 
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. through Thursday, March 20, 1997, from 9:00 a.m. to 
noon, approximately.
    The SSC, AP and HAP will meet on March 19, 1997, from 1:00 p.m. to 
3:00 p.m., to discuss the presentation of Dr. Downs and provide their 
comments to the Council.
    The meetings are open to the public, and will be conducted in 
English. Fishers and other interested persons are invited to attend and 
participate with oral or written statements regarding agenda issues.
    There will be simultaneous translation (English-Spanish) at the AP 
meeting only, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., on March 19, 1997.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. For more information or requests for sign language 
interpretation and/or other auxiliary aids please contact Mr. Miguel A. 
Rolon at the Council (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 5 
days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Gary C. Matlock
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 97-4156 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                    % OF VOTING
                                                                                     SECURITIES
                                                                                    OWNED BY ITS
                                                                JURISDICTION OF      IMMEDIATE
                    NAME OF CORPORATION                          INCORPORATION         PARENT
                    -------------------                          -------------         ------
<S>                                                           <C>                   <C>
Transatlantic Reinsurance Company...........................  New York, U.S.A.          100%
    Putnam Reinsurance Company..............................  New York, U.S.A.          100%*
    Trans Re Zurich.........................................  Zurich, Switzerland       100%*
    Transatlantic Re (Argentina) S.A. ......................  Argentina                 100%*
    Transatlantic Re (Brasil) Ltda..........................  Brazil                    100%*
    Transatlantic Polska Sp. z o.o. ........................  Warsaw, Poland            100%*
</Table>

--------------

* The common stock is owned 100% by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Anthony ESPERTI, Respondent.

No. 69-689.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 5, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for petitioner.

Louis Vernell, Miami Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner files this timely petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the trial court requiring the petitioner to disclose for an in camera inspection all evidence favorable to the respondent.

Respondent argues that common law certiorari is not the appropriate vehicle to review the order of the trial court. This contention was specifically rejected by this court in State v. Gillespie, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 550.

The record before the court conclusively shows that the respondent has satisfied the dictates of this court’s announced prerequisite for the entry of the order here reviewed. State v. Williams, Fla.App.1969, 227 So.2d 253, and State v. Gillespie, *supra.*

Inasmuch as the respondent has laid the predicate required for the entry of an order compelling disclosure of all evidence favorable to him for an in camera inspection by the trial court, the petition for writ of certi-orari is

Denied.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and PIERCE, JJ., concur.
#### William D. FOSTER, Appellant, v. Della Gaye FOSTER, Appellee.

No. 70-826.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 24, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April *21,*1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
J-A34011-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v.

MAWUYRAYRASSUNA EMMANUEL 

YAOGAN NOVIHO

Appellant No. 394 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence January 27, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-36-CR-0004200-2013

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., OTT, J., and JENKINS, J. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED FEBRUARY 17, 2016

Appellant, Mawuyrayrassuna Emmanuel Yaogan Noviho, appeals from 

the judgment of sentence entered by the Honorable David L. Ashworth, 

Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County. We affirm. 

We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural 

history of the case. For a recitation of the facts and procedural history of this 

matter, we direct the reader to the opinion of the trial court. See Trial Court 

Opinion, 4/7/15, at 1-3. 

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the certified record, and 

the trial court opinion. The trial court, the Honorable David L. Ashworth, has 

authored an opinion that ably disposes of the issues presented on appeal. 

We affirm based on that opinion. See id., at 3-32. 
J-A34011-15

- 2 -

Order affirmed. 

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 2/17/2016
Circulated 02/02/2016 11:27 AM
#### Vincent A. KULAS and Genevieve H. Kulas, his wife, Appellants, v. Richard J. LOVE, Appellee.

No. 71-523.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; Culver Smith, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### Joseph A. DUPAQUIER v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 4155.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Dec. 7, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 11, 1971.

Writ Granted March 10, 1971.

Levy, Smith & Pailet, Lawrence J. Smith, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appel-lee.

Blake G. Arata, City Atty., Jackson P. McNeely, Asst. City Atty., for defendant-appellant.

Before REGAN, TAYLOR and Le-SUEUR, JJ.

LeSUEUR, Judge.

Mr. Dupaquier, a retired fireman, was working for the Fire Department of the City of New Orleans in March of 1966 when he suffered a heart attack. He received sick leave benefits pursuant to the applicable statute until October of 1968, when he received a disability pension. This suit for workmen’s compensation benefits was not filed until December 20, 1968.

These facts present, as the first order of business, the question of prescription. *332Pursuant to the decision of this court in Guerrera v. City of New Orleans, La.App., 212 So.2d 223 (4th Cir. 1968), sick leave benefits do neither constitute nor include compensation payments, and payment for sick days, per se, does not, therefore, toll the running of the applicable prescriptive period.

The plaintiff contends, however, and the evidence clearly demonstrates that he was acting under the impression that these payments did in fact include compensation benefits. It is further clear that prior to Guerrera v. City of New Orleans, supra, both the City and the Union hierarchy were acting upon that assumption.

It is at this point that the chain of proof ends. Mr. Dupaquier does not testify that anyone in the Department administration or in City government so informed *him.*He specifically traces his impression to remarks by fellow firemen. Indeed, he freely admits that, within the prescriptive period, he did not so much as check with anyone in authority in the Department or City Administration.

Proof of a general misunderstanding is one thing; proof of “misleading” is quite another. Here, it is clear that there was a misunderstanding, on everyone’s part. There is, however, no evidence that the City or anyone acting in its interests played the slightest direct role in placing the mistaken impression within Mr. Dupaquier’s mind. Thus, while we by no means agree with the defendant that tolling requires proof of design or intent to mislead, we see no reasonable basis for the application of the doctrine absent a more substantial link between the employer and the misim-pression that was proved in this action. See Williams v. Red Barn Chemicals, Inc., La.App., 188 So.2d 78 (1st Cir. 1966).

For these reasons, the judgment appealed from is reversed and judgment is hereby granted defendant. Plaintiff’s suit is, therefore, dismissed. In view of the nature of this action, however, costs in both courts are to be borne by the defendant.

Reversed and rendered.
258 La. 585

#### Elizabeth Lucille Bradford FULCO v. Frank FULCO, Jr.

No. 51367.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 14, 1971.

In re: Elizabeth Lucille Bradford Fulco applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 245 So.2d 461.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and-defendant be notified.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)**

**OFTHE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with theAnnual Report of Cascade Microtech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Sipowicz, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the bestof my knowledge,:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ Steven Sipowicz     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Steven Sipowicz         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| Cascade Microtech, Inc. |
| March 16, 2007          |

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section1350, and not for any other purpose.  Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to CascadeMicrotech, Inc. and will be retained by Cascade Microtech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Feldschuh,
Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Stephen Feldschuh
Stephen Feldschuh
Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2005


                                       9
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4090]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities and 
Exchange Commission will hold the following open meeting during the 
week of February 17, 1997.
    An open meeting will be held on Tuesday, February 18, 1997, at 10 
a.m., in Room 1C30.
    The subject matter of the open meeting scheduled for Tuesday, 
February 18, 1997, at 10 a.m., will be:
    (1) The commission will consider whether to issue a release 
adopting amendments shortening the holding periods under Rule 144.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Martin P. Dunn or Elizabeth M. 
Murphy, Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Corporation Finance, at 
(202) 942-2900.
    (2) The Commission will consider whether to issue a release 
proposing amendments to the Regulation S safe harbor procedures and 
related changes for offshore sales of equity securities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Paul M. Dudek or Walter G. Van 
Dorn, Jr., Office of International Corporate Finance, Division of 
Corporation Finance, at (202) 942-2990.
    Commissioner Hunt, as duty officer, determined that no earlier 
notice thereof was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 942-7070.

    Dated: February 13, 1997.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4090 Filed 2-13-97; 3:57 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
Exhibit 12





AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Unaudited)







|                                                   | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended
|-------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | -----------------
|                                                   | September 30,      | September 30,    
|(dollars in thousands)                             | 2006               | 2005
Restated    
|Earnings:
Income before provision for income taxes | $145,696           | $200,730         
|Interest expense                                   | 292,614            | 230,696          
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 5,062              | 4,800            
|Total earnings                                     | $443,372           | $436,226         
|Fixed charges:
Interest expense                    | $292,614           | $230,696         
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 5,062              | 4,800            
|Total fixed charges                                | $297,676           | $235,496         
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 | 1.49               | 1.85             





43
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

       
<S>                             <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998        DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                   APR-01-1998        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1998        JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                   345                345
<SECURITIES>                               0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                          42611              42611 
<ALLOWANCES>                            1300               1300 
<INVENTORY>                            56267              56267 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      100528             100528 
<PP&E>                                 57368              57368 
<DEPRECIATION>                         21044              21044 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        162605             162605 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  51476              51476 
<BONDS>                                43865              43865 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0                  0
<PREFERRED>                                0                  0
<COMMON>                               10000              10000 
<OTHER-SE>                             50142              50142 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          162605             162605 
<SALES>                                73971             139387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       73971             139387
<CGS>                                  29420              54858 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          65450             124454 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         150                300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1068               1969 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         7453              12964 
<INCOME-TAX>                            3048               5308 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     4405               7656 
<DISCONTINUED>                             0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0                  0
<CHANGES>                                  0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                            4405               7656 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .58               1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .54                .93
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                 3,273
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         59,553
<ALLOWANCES>                           1,300
<INVENTORY>                           61,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     132,593
<PP&E>                                63,024
<DEPRECIATION>                        25,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       195,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 48,921
<BONDS>                               82,517
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              10,000
<OTHER-SE>                            44,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         195,773
<SALES>                               77,653
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      77,653
<CGS>                                 34,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         73,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     2,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2,155
<INCOME-TAX>                             981
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,174
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,174
<EPS-BASIC>                              .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .15



</TABLE>