alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4482]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 United States Code, Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of 
the following meeting:

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 20-21, 1997.
    Time: 8:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m., March 20, 8:00 a.m.--adjourment, 
March 21.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Mary Nekola, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIDCD/DEA/SRB, EPS Room 400C, 6120 Executive 
Boulevard, MSC 7180, Bethesda MD 20892-7180, 301-496-8683.
    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate Program Project 
applications. The meeting will be closed in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5, 
United States Code. The applications and/or proposals and the 
discussion could reveal confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the applications and/or 
proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.173 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communication Disorders)

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-4482 Filed 2-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings:

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Dates of Meeting: February 24, 1997 (Telephone conference).
    Time: 10 a.m.
    Place of Meeting: Willco Building, 6000 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Thomas D. Sevy, M.S.W., 6000 Executive Blvd., 
Suite 409 Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-6107.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the urgent need to meet timing limitations imposed by 
the review and funding cycle.

    Purpose/Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Dates of Meeting: March 18, 1997 (Telephone conference).
    Time: 11 a.m.
    Place of Meeting: Willco Building, 6000 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Thomas D. Sevy, M.S.W., 6000 Executive Blvd., 
Suite 409, Bethesda, MD 20892-7003, 301-443-6107.

    The meeting will be closed in accordance with the provisions set 
forth in secs. 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C. Applications 
and/or proposals and the discussions could reveal confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
applications and/or proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute 
a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.271, Alcohol 
Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 
93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research 
Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol 
Research Center Grants; National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Committee Management Officer, NIH.
[FR Doc. 97-3944 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Banker's Store (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Albert
Blankenship, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: October 20, 2003                                 /s/ ALBERT BLANKENSHIP
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Albert Blankenship
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
No. 72-1045.

#### Bible Baptist Church *v.*Ireland et al.

Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 9th Sup. Jud. Dist. Certiorari denied.
Ex 10c18 2013 10-K






EXHIBIT 10(c)18






BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


GEORGIA POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2014, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Georgia Power Company and certain other executive officers of Georgia Power Company who served during 2013.




	
			
	W. Paul Bowers
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$787,338
	 

	W. Ron Hinson
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
And Treasurer
	$358,799
	 

	Ronnie R. Labrato*
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
	$307,114
	 

	Joseph A. Miller
Executive Vice President
	$427,612
	 

	John L. Pemberton
Senior Vice President and Senior Production Officer
	$318,624
	 

	Anthony L. Wilson
Executive Vice President
	$353,266
	 






*Retired March 31, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          42,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,801
<INVENTORY>                                     46,317
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,841
<PP&E>                                          32,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 313,845
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          143,527
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                     160,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,845
<SALES>                                        558,623
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               558,623
<CGS>                                          455,528
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  455,528
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   390
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,854
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,236
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11
                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Three Months Ended
                                               -----------------------------
                                               December 28,     December 30,
                                                   1996             1995
                                               ------------     ------------

<S>                                             <C>              <C>
Primary
-------
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding             1,309,691        1,296,785
Dilutive Effect on Stock Options                       --           99,723
                                                --------------------------
Weighted Average Common and Equivalent
 Shares Outstanding                             1,309,691        1,396,488
                                                ==========================


Fully Diluted
-------------
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding             1,309,691        1,296,785
Dilutive Effect on Stock Options                       --          121,680
                                                --------------------------
Weighted Average Common and Equivalent
 Shares Outstanding                             1,309,691        1,418,445
                                                ==========================
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances, Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated July 31, 1996, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 8, 1996, (61 FR 41427), Allen, Dovensky & Company, 
Inc., 3529 Lincoln Highway, Thorndale, Pennsylvania 19372, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of morphine (9300), a basic class 
of controlled substance listed in Schedule II.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in Title 21, United States Code, Section 823(a) and 
determined that the registration of Allen, Dovensky & Company, Inc. to 
manufacture morphine is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 and 28 CFR 0.100 and 0.104, 
the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby 
orders that the application submitted by the above firm for 
registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled 
substance listed above is granted.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Gene R. Haislip,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-3643 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### BAYCOL, INC., Appellant, v. DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF the CITY OF FT. LAUDERDALE, a public corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-817.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 28, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF AER ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,249,868
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     52,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,354,011
<PP&E>                                       3,970,689
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,006,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,335,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          284,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    66,593,140
<OTHER-SE>                                 (61,542,800)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,335,330
<SALES>                                          1,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,636
<CGS>                                            1,405
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,405
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,360,058
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (6,631,509)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,631,509)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,631,509)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Elizabeth GETTINGER, Appellant, v. AMERICANA HOTEL OF BAL HARBOUR, INC., a Florida Corporation d/b/a Americana Hotel, Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company, a Foreign Insurance Corporation, and American Home Assurance Company, a Foreign Insurance Corporation, Appellees.

No. 77-388.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 1978.

Guy B. Bailey, Jr. and William R. Dawes, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, P. J. Carroll & Associates, Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Knight, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff Elizabeth Gettinger appeals a remittitur or new trial order entered by the Circuit Court for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida in a slip-and-fall, personal injury tort action after the jury had returned $850,000 verdict for the plaintiff against the defendant Americana Hotel of Bal Harbour, Inc. and its insurers Consolidated Mutual Insurance Company and American Home Assurance Company. The plaintiff contends that the jury verdict finding the defendant 100 percent negligent was based upon substantial competent evidence, that the damages awarded were not excessive or unconscionable in view of the plaintiff’s extensive injuries and resultant medical expenses, and that the court erred in entering the order of remittitur or new trial. We entirely agree. *Allred*v. *Chittenden Pool Supply, Inc.,*298 So.2d 361 (Fla.1974); *Laskey v. Smith,*239 So.2d 13 (Fla.1970); *Hanson v. Florida East Coast Railway,*334 So.2d 63 (Fla.3d DCA 1976); *Mansell v. Eidge,*179 So.2d 624 (Fla.3d DCA 1965); *Clark v. Russo,*133 So.2d 764 (Fla.2d DCA 1961), cert. discharged 147 So.2d 1 (Fla.1962); *Mow v. F. P. Sadowski Corp.,*122 So.2d 46 (Fla.3d DCA 1960), cert. den. 131 So.2d 3 (Fla.1961). We further find no merit in the defendant’s cross assignments of error and arguments based thereon.

*915The order appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to enter a judgment for the plaintiff in accordance with the jury verdict.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 12.2


                               Dean Foods Company
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
                                  (In Millions)



                                                      26 Weeks Ended
                                                   November 26, 2000
                                                   -----------------
Income before taxes                                $            90.8
                                                   -----------------

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense                                           36.7
     Portion of rentals (33%)                                    8.4
                                                   -----------------

     Total fixed charges                                        45.1
                                                   -----------------

Earnings before taxes and fixed charges            $           135.9
                                                   =================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends                                        3.0
                                                   =================
#### Ronald Michael RATNER, Appellant, v. Marsha Ellen PRESSMAN, Appellee.

No. 69-895.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 19, 1970.

*548Jack R. Nageley and Harvey S. Swickle, Miami Beach, for appellant.

William John Mason, Miami, for ap-pellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellee was plaintiff below, having' filed her complaint against the appellant which alleged that he was the father of her unborn child. The case was tried before a jury and a verdict was rendered on behalf of the appellant, finding that he was not the father of the (by-then) born child of the appellee. Thereafter, the appellee filed her motion for judgment n. o. v., or in the alternative, motion for new trial. The court granted her motion for the new trial, and the appellant has appealed that order.

The trial judge predicated his granting of the motion for the new trial on two grounds. First the judge acknowledged that the appellee had not been given her full opportunity to obtain a panel of jurors who were unbiased and unprejudiced concerning the issues involved in this particular case because of the commission of a legal error. The second ground was that the verdict was against the manifest weight of evidence. It is a long settled rule that the discretion allowed to a trial judge in the granting of new trials is a very broad and liberal one. E. g., Canizares v. Encore, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 790. The judge’s determination as to the possible bias or prejudice that may have been present in the jury was based on the applicable law. See Mizell v. New Kingsley Beach, Inc., Fla. App.1960, 122 So.2d 225. Moreover, having reviewed the record on appeal, we cannot say that the appellant has carried the burden of demonstrating that the court abused its discretion as to his findings that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.

For the reasons stated above, the order granting the appellee’s motion for new trial is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                 5
<CIK>                                     0000027748
<NAME>                                    DEL GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            AUG-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              NOV-01-1997
<CASH>                                       6,444,734
<SECURITIES>                                   959,457
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,194,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,682
<INVENTORY>                                 25,209,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,878,534
<PP&E>                                      16,859,612
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,406,867
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,815,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,204,272
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       761,171
<OTHER-SE>                                  53,589,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,815,582
<SALES>                                     13,480,069
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,480,069
<CGS>                                        8,047,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,047,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,638,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (54,275)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,848,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                   591,524
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,256,987
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,256,987
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        


</TABLE>
EX-10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
  





 
 February 5, 2014 

Robert W. Musslewhite 
 Chief Executive Officer 

2445 M Street NW 
 Washington DC 20037 

Re: Collaboration Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2007, by and between The Corporate Executive Board Company and The Advisory Board Company (as
previously amended, the “Collaboration Agreement”) 
 Dear Robert: 

This letter confirms that The Corporate Executive Board Company (“CEB”) and The Advisory Board Company (“ABCO”) have
agreed to extend the Initial NP Term and the Initial EC Term (as such terms are defined in the Collaboration Agreement) through February 5, 2017 as comtemplated by Sections 3.3(a) and 3.4(a) of the Collaboration Agreement, respectively,
effective as of the date hereof. 
 Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning one copy of this letter to my
attention, which shall constitute CEB’s and ABCO’s agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	 /s/ Tom Monahan

	Tom Monahan
	 Chairman of the Board and
 Chief Executive
Officer



 ACCEPTED AND AGREED: 
 THE
ADVISORY BOARD COMPANY 
  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert Musslewhite

		 	Robert W. Musslewhite
		 	Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.23




Description of Arrangement for Directors Fees







Except as set forth below, the following sets forth the amount of fees payable to outside directors for their services as Directors in fiscal year 2014:








	
 

	 	


	 	 	
Restricted

	 
	
Fees

	 	
Cash

	 	 	
Stock Units

	 
	
Annual Retainer Fee

	 	


	 	 	


	 
	
Company:

	 	


	 	 	


	 
	
Chair

	 	
$

	
50,000

	 	 	
$

	
54,000

	 
	
Director

	 	
$

	
12,500

	 	 	
$

	
13,000

	 
	
NBT Bank N.A.:

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Chair

	 	 	
-

	 	 	
$

	
11,000

	 
	
Director

	 	
$

	
12,500

	 	 	
$

	
8,000

	 
	
Committee Chair:

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Audit and Risk Management

	 	
$

	
10,000

	 	 	 	
-

	 
	
All Other Committees

	 	
$

	
5,000

	 	 	 	
-

	 
	
Affiliate Board Member

	 	
$

	
1,000

	 	 	 	
-

	 
	
 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Fee per Board Meeting

	 	
$

	
1,000

	 	 	 	
-

	 
	
 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
Fee per Committee Meeting

	 	
$

	
800

	 	 	 	
-