alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7179 

To provide liability protection for covered providers during the COVID– 

19 outbreak, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Mr. MURPHY of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. HARRIS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide liability protection for covered providers during 

the COVID–19 outbreak, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pandemic Liability 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION FROM LIABILITY FOR COVERED PRO7 VIDERS IN CERTAIN CIVIL ACTIONS RELAT8 ING TO COVID–19. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

10 (b), a covered provider who operated during a public 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7179 IH

1 health emergency with respect to COVID–19 declared pur2 suant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

3 U.S.C. 247d) shall not be liable under Federal or State 

4 law for any act or omission of such covered provider with 

5 respect to any harm arising from exposure to, or infection 

6 by, the virus that causes COVID–19. 

7 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply if 

8 the harm was caused by an act or omission constituting 

9 willful or criminal misconduct, gross negligence, reckless 

10 misconduct, or a conscious flagrant indifference to the 

11 rights or safety of the individual harmed by the covered 

12 provider. 

13 (c) PREEMPTION.—This section preempts the laws of 

14 a State or any political subdivision of a State to the extent 

15 that such laws are inconsistent with this section, unless 

16 such laws provide greater protection from liability. 

17 (d) COVERED PROVIDER DEFINED.—In this Act, the 

18 term ‘‘covered provider’’ means any of the following: 

19 (1) A healthcare provider which includes a 

20 nursing home, health care clinic, pharmacy, hospital, 

21 outpatient center, blood donation center, and urgent 

22 care center. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7179 IH

1 (2) A food provider which includes an owner or 

2 operator of a farm, fishery, food processing plant, 

3 food packaging plant, restaurant, and grocery store. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3482]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INFORMATION AGENCY


Notice of Receipt of Cultural Property Request From the 
Government of Peru

    The Government of Peru has submitted a cultural property request to 
the Government of the United States under Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO 
Convention. The request was received on January 28, 1997, by the United 
States Information Agency. The request seeks U.S. protection of certain 
categories of archaeological and/or ethnological material the pillage 
of which, it is alleged, jeopardizes the national cultural patrimony of 
Peru. In accordance with the provisions of the Convention on Cultural 
Property Implementation Act (19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.), the request will 
be reviewed by the Cultural Property Advisory Committee which will 
develop recommendations before a determination is made.

    Dated: February 7, 1997.
Penn Kemble,
Deputy Director, United States Information Agency.
[FR Doc. 97-3482 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
l ' 

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Symbion-Ozdil-Al Namarq Joint Venture ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W91GXY-06-C-0072 ) 

ASBCA No. 59057 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Timothy A. Diemand, Esq. 

Wiggin and Dana LLP 

Hartford, CT 

APPEARANCES FOR OTHE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Stephen P. Smith, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: April 5, 2019 

DONALDE.KlNNER 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59057, Appeal of Symbion-Ozdil-Al 

Namarq Joint Venture, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 10.48






Willis


REPLY TO:
Celia R. Brown
Global Human Resources Director
Willis Group Holdings PLC
One World Financial Center
200 Liberty Street, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10281
Direct Line: 212-915-8556
E-mail: celia brown@willis com


Dear Dominic


I refer to my letter dated 30 November 2012 wherein I informed you that for the duration of the Period (as
that term is defined in that letter) Willis Group Services Limited ('WGS') had agreed to provide your
remuneration and benefits described in your Employment Agreement with WGH and, for the purposes of
compliance with its statutory obligations during the Period, it would also be your employing company.


As you know, the Period expired on 6 January 2014. However, I am pleased to inform you that WGS has
agreed to extend its employment of you until 6 July 2014 (the 'Extended Period'). I am therefore able
once again to advise that, pursuant to its power contained in Clause 1ofyour Employment Agreement, up
to and including the Extended Period WGS will continue to provide your remuneration and benefits
described in the Employment Agreement and will be your employing company and, for the purposes of
compliance with its statutory obligations during the Extended Period, WGS will also adopt the terms and
conditions of your Employment Agreement with WGH.


As also mentioned in my earlier letter, Clause 1(b)(i) of your Employment Agreement provides for
payment of your salary in US Dollars. During the Extended Period at your request (which is confirmed
by your counter-signature to this letter) your salary will be paid to you in British Pounds Sterling and
WGS shall apply the rate of currency exchange between the GB Pound and the US Dollar published in the
Financial Times (London Edition) on the working day immediately prior to the usual monthly UK payroll
cut-off date for payment of your salary in accordance with the payment provisions of the Agreement.


In addition, clause 1(b)(iii) of the Agreement provides for payment of a transition payment of $1,500,000
on the first anniversary which you have agreed will be paid to you on 31 January 2014 in GB Pounds on
the UK payroll using the currency exchange above.


By counter-signing this letter you agree to the terms set out above.
Yours sincerely


Celia Brown
Executive Vice President
Group Human Resources Director


I have read, understood and accept the above terms and variation to the Agreement.


Dominic Casserley
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. TM97-7-29-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 13, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 7, 1997, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing certain revised tariff 
sheets to its FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1 which tariff 
sheets are enumerated in Appendix A attached to the filing.
    Transco states that the purpose of the instant filing is to track 
rate changes attributable to storage service purchased from Texas 
Eastern Transmission Corporation (TETCO) under its Rate Schedule X-28 
the costs of which are included in the rates and charges payable under 
Transco's Rate Schedule S-2 and transportation services purchased from 
Texas Gas Transmission Corporation (Texas Gas) under its Rate Schedule 
FT, the costs of which are included in the rates and charges payable 
under Transco's Rate Schedule FT-NT. The tracking filing is being made 
pursuant to Section 26 of the General Terms and Conditions of Transco's 
Volume No. 1 Tariff and Section 4 of Transco's Rate Schedule FT-NT.
    Transco states that included in Appendices B and C attached to the 
filing are explanations of the rate changes and details regarding the 
computation of the revised Rate Schedule S-2 and FT-NT rates.
    Transco states that copies of the filing are being mailed to each 
of its S-2 and FT-NT customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, Washington, D.C. 20426, in 
accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's Rules 
and Regulations. All such motions or protests must be filed as provided 
in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a motion to 
intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and 
are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-4134 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7341

CHARLES KEE, a/k/a O.P.G., a/k/a Billy Bad Ass, a/k/a G.F., a/k/a 9 Tray, a/k/a Punisher, a/k/a Ali, a/k/a O. G. Pun, a/k/a Ali Talib Abdul Skakur Muslum , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. B.M. ANTONELLI, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 00217

- MGL )

Submitted : January 23, 2020 Decided: January 28, 2020

Before WYNN, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles Kee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Charles Kee , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Kee’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (201 8 ) petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction . We have reviewed the record and find
no reversi ble error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Kee
v. Antonelli , No. 1:19

- cv
- 00217

- MGL (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2019) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mater ials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Gilbert E. HAIN and Alice Frank Hain, Appellants, v. Anthony L. POWELL, a minor, by his father and next friend, Louis A. Powell, and Louis A. Powell, Appellees.

No. 69-420.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 4, 1970.

Rehearing Denied April 21, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20580

 Division of Enforcement

Bureau of Consumer Protection

December 27, 2004

Lewis Rose, Esq.

Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC

Washington Harbour, Suite 400

3050 K Street, NW

Washington, DC 20007

Re: Gateway Learning Corp.

FTC Docket No. C-4120

Dear Mr. Rose:

The Division of Enforcement has reviewed your submission dated November 16, 2004,

which was filed pursuant to Part VIII of the above referenced order issued on September 10,

2004, to show the manner and form of the respondent’s compliance with the order. The staff has

concluded, on the assumption that the information submitted is accurate and complete, that no

compliance action is indicated at this time. We will not be precluded, however, from

recommending to the Commission an appropriate action if the submitted information is

inaccurate or incomplete or if the respondent violates the terms of the order.

Sincerely,

Elaine D. Kolish

Associate Director
EXHIBIT10-12




EXHIBIT  10.12




Summary of Jeffrey R. Blom 2014 Compensation




The Knoll, Inc. compensation committee approved an annual base salary of $265,000 for Jeffrey R. Blom, with a bonus target of one hundred percent (100%) of his base salary.  Mr. Blom is also entitled to participate in the benefit plans provided by Knoll that are generally available to Knoll employees.
### ALM AGENDA

Joint Air Resources Board - Federal Land Managers Meeting

January 13, 2016

1:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m.

Cal EPA, 1001 I Street, Room 620

Sacramento, CA

Conference Call Number:

Password:

Agenda Items:

Item Leader Time

Introductions/Review of Agenda Karen Magliano, CARB, Jerry Bird,

USFS 1:00 – 1:10

Drought tree mortality task force Karen Magliano, CARB 1:10 – 1:35

SJVAPCD recommendations to promote more Prescribed Fire Shawn Ferreria, SJVAPCD 1:35 – 2:00

Sequoia NF / Inyo / Mono citizen and local politicians meeting Kevin Elliot, USFS Sequoia 2:00 – 2:15

Exceptional Events Rule Update Meredith Kurpius, EPA 2:15 – 2:30

Development Guide for Exceptional Events Related to Fire Trent Procter, USFS 2:30 – 2:45

Air Resource Advisor Review - Wildfire Coordination in California Pete Lahm, USFS 2:45 – 3:00

Regional Haze Update Tina Suarez-Murias, CARB 3:00 – 3:05

PFIRS Update Jason Branz,,CARB 3:05 – 3:10

Review of Last Season – Wildfires or Prescribed fires – What worked

and didn’t All 3:10 – 3:15

Outlook for this season – Fire potential and highest risk areas All 3:15- 3:20

Discuss any action items or agenda topics for next meeting Karen Magliano, CARB, Jerry Bird,

USFS 3:20 – 3:30
#### Brenda JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Earl Lavaughn JOHNSON, Appellee.

No. 73-705.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 24, 1973.

J. E. Satterfield of The Legal Aid Society, Clearwater, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

MANN, Chief Judge.

*In all candor we must recognise that the matter of divorce is a legislative prerogative.*

Dekle, J., in Ryan v. Ryan, Fla.1973, *277*So.2d 266 at 274

We are oathbound to reverse a circuit judge who refused to grant a dissolution of marriage to a woman who came into his court with “unclean hands.” Reminded in a petition for rehearing that the legislature had abrogated the “clean hands” defense in divorce actions and that the Supreme Court had, in *Ryan,*quoted from above, held the law constitutional, the trial judge replied that “some court other than this one must announce the abdication of common sense, morality, and decency by the courts of this state.” It is our duty to oblige, although one of our seven Justices agrees with the trial judge in this case. We receive the statutory law from the legislature and its interpretation from our Supreme Court, agreeing with some, disagreeing with some, following all, because our bondage to law is the price of our freedom.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in accordance with law.

McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Cementitious  Materials,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Edward
F. Cowle,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


/s/   EDWARD F. COWLE
-----------------------------
Edward F. Cowle
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2005


     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906, or
     other document  authenticating,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic  version of this
     written  statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
     the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
     staff upon  request.  The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying  the
     Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
     Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of title
     18,  United  States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB
     or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSEPH JONES,

Defendant Below–

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below–

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 82, 2019

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1712008278 (N)

§ 

§

§

§

Submitted: April 5, 2019

Decided: April 15, 2019

ORDER

It appears to the Court that, on March 19, 2019, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued 

a notice, sent by certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal 

should not be dismissed for the appellant's failure to pay the Supreme Court filing 

fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant received the notice by 

March 25, 2019, and has failed to respond within the required ten-day period. 

Dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73

[MM Docket No. 97-48; RM-8994]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Earlville, IL

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission requests comments on a petition filed by Second 
Congregational Services proposing the allotment of Channel 275A at 
Earlville, Illinois, as the community's first local aural transmission 
service. Channel 275A can be allotted to Earlville in compliance with 
the Commission's minimum distance separation requirements with a site 
restriction of 13.4 kilometers (8.3 miles) northwest at petitioner's 
requested site. The coordinates for Channel 275A at Earlville are North 
Latitude 41-38-55 and West Longitude 89-03-51.

DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 31, 1997, and reply 
comments on or before April 15, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In 
addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should 
serve the petitioner, or its counsel or consultant, as follows: Henry 
E. Crawford, Esq., 1150 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite 900, Washington, 
DC 20036 (Counsel for Petitioner).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharon P. McDonald, Mass Media Bureau, 
(202) 418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 97-48, adopted January 
31, 1997, and released February 7, 1997. The full text of this 
Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during 
normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room 239), 1919 M 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The complete text of this decision may 
also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, International 
Transcription Service, Inc., (202) 857-3800, 2100 M Street, NW., Suite 
140, Washington, DC 20037.
    Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply 
to this proceeding.
    Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of 
Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to 
Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are 
prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve 
channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing 
permissible ex parte contacts.
    For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, 
see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio broadcasting.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Chief, Allocations Branch, Policy and Rules Division, Mass Media 
Bureau.
[FR Doc. 97-3723 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-F
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Feldschuh, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly resents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor Corporation.

|   | /s/ Joseph   Feldschuh, M.D. |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   |                              |
|   | Joseph   Feldschuh, M.D.     |
|   | President   and Chief        |
|   | Executive   Officer          |
|   | August 9, 2007               |
#### DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA GROWERS COOP. TRANSPORT, Respondent.

No. 43625.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 31, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 273 So.2d 142.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, . McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.