alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>             5
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           OCT-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-3-1999
<CASH>                                         278,075
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,823,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                   149,633
<INVENTORY>                                  4,918,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,976,573
<PP&E>                                       5,120,330
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,624,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,859,051
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,017,421
<BONDS>                                         76,341
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,411
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,749,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,859,051
<SALES>                                      6,533,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,533,033
<CGS>                                        4,065,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,065,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,807
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             448,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (708,881)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (708,881)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (708,881)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Bobby Ray SPATES v. Ross MAGGIO, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 61426.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1978.

In re: Bobby Ray Spates applying for writ of habeas corpus. Parish of Caddo.

The order to the trial judge to appoint counsel and resentence applicant with benefit of counsel is annulled and set aside. This application is denied. See also # 58107 on the docket of this Court.
#### Elvy RHYNES v. STATE.

No. 38242.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 1969.

Mandamus denied without opinion.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 243 / Thursday, December 18, 1997 / Presidential Documents 66253

Presidential Determination No. 98–7 of December 5, 1997

Presidential Determination Under Subsections 402(a) and

409(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, as Amended—Emigration

Policies of Albania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan,

Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by subsections 402(a) and 409(a)

of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2432(a) and 2439(a) (the ‘‘Act’’)), I

determine that Albania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,

and Uzbekistan are not in violation of paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection

402(a) of the Act, or paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of subsection 409(a) of the

Act.

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal

[FR Doc. 97–33233

Register

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, December 5, 1997.

.

œ–

Filed 12–17–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 4710–10–M
From: Anna Myers

To: Ungvarsky, John; Errol Villegas

Subject: RE: Publication of 1-hr Ozone Plan

Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:51:24 AM

Hi John,

Yes, the announcement was posted to the District website on August 20,

 2013.

Thanks,

Anna

From: Ungvarsky, John [mailto:Ungvarsky.John@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:47 AM

To: Errol Villegas; Anna Myers

Subject: Re: Publication of 1-hr Ozone Plan

Hi Errol and Anna -

Sorry for the follow up question, but can you please confirm that the announcement was

 actually posted on your web site on Aug 20, 2013? A reply from either of you confirming such

 is needed (e.g., "Yes, the announcement was posted on our website on August 20, 2013.")

I looked at the attached documents, and unfortunately, neither is clear on when the posting

 occurred or email sent out. The email from Anna to the WebMaster is a request to have the

 public hearing (and associated documents) posted on Aug 20, 2013, but it's not proof they

 were actually put on line that date, and the email from Ross to the list serve does not include

 a date when it was sent out.

Thanks

John Ungvarsky

Environmental Scientist

Air Planning Office, Air Division

USEPA Region 9

415-972-3963 (primary office)

510-667-9743 (alternate work site)

From: Errol Villegas <errol.villegas@valleyair.org>

Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 11:36 AM

To: Ungvarsky, John

Cc: Anna Myers

Subject: Publication of 1-hr Ozone Plan
Hi John –

Attached are two emails that demonstrate the 1-hr Ozone Plan was published for public review at

 least 30 days before the hearing.

· The first is the internal email chain sent to have the plan published on the District’s website

 on 8/20/2013.

· The second is the email sent to our list serv (ozone_plans@lists.valleyair.org) to coincide

 with the posting of the document.

Hope this documentation is sufficient. Let me know if you have any questions or need any additional

 information.

Thanks,

Errol

Errol Villegas

Program Manager - Strategies & Incentives Department

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

(559) 230-5806

errol.villegas@valleyair.org
#### Ernest PRITCHETT, Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director, Division of Corrections, Respondent.

No. 72-789.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 11, 1972.

Habeas corpus denied.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 38 (Wednesday, February 26, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3748]



[[Page 8619]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. 96-ACE-20]


Amendment to Class E Airspace, Imperial, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The direct final rule published on November 29, 1996 (61 FR 
60525), amends the Class E airspace area at Imperial Municipal Airport, 
Imperial NE. The effect of that rule is to provide additional 
controlled airspace for aircraft executing the new Standard Instrument 
Approach Procedure (SIAP) at Imperial Municipal Airport. This document 
confirms the effective date of that rule.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, Operations Branch, ACE-530C, 
Federal Aviation Administration, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, 
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 426-3408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published the direct final rule with 
a request for comments in the Federal Register on November 29, 1996, 
(61 FR 60525). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. The direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on March 27, 1997. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this document confirms that the final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 29, 1997.
Charles R. Raymond,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division Central Region.
[FR Doc. 97-3748 Filed 2-25-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
ACCOMPANYING  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DATAMETRICS CORPORATION AS OF
AND FOR THE THREE MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED  January 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                         JAN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               137
<SECURITIES>                                         579
<RECEIVABLES>                                        760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         50
<INVENTORY>                                          3,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,667
<PP&E>                                               7,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       11,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             190
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         11,238
<SALES>                                              1,131
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,131
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,352)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.07)




</TABLE>
#### BAHAMA POOLS, INC., Appellant, v. J. C. HOWARTH, Appellee.

No. 72-851.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 10, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Richard H. Cooper, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3658]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary


Applications of Jet America Charters, L.C. D/B/A Jet America; for 
Issuance of New Certificate Authority

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 97-2-4); Dockets OST-96-
1661 and OST-96-1662.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue orders finding Jet 
America Charters, L.C. d/b/a Jet America fit, willing, and able, and 
awarding it certificates of public convenience and necessity to engage 
in interstate and foreign scheduled air transportation of persons, 
property, and mail.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
February 28, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Dockets OST-96-1661 and OST-96-1662 and addressed to the Department of 
Transportation Dockets (SVC-120.30, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, and 
should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Lawyer, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56, Room 6401), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-1064.

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
Charles A. Hunnicutt,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 97-3658 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
#### Yancey MORRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-815.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 26, 1972.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 24, 1972.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Hubert G. Roberts, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Harry Purnell, Legal Intern, for appellee.

Before CHARLES CARROLL, HEN-DRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant defendant Yancey Morris seeks review of a judgment of conviction for robbery entered after a guilty verdict in a jury trial and the 30 year sentence imposed. For reversal he has presented several points, but only his argument concerning denial of a speedy trial merits discussion.

Morris was arrested and informed against prior to the effective date of Rule 3.191, CrPR, In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A., Fla. 1971, 245 So.2d 33. He contends that the 60 day rule, rather than the 180 day rule, governs so that he should be discharged. Rule 3.191 (a)(1), (2) CrPR.

 Appellant is thrust upon the horns of a dilemma. First, assuming that his motion for a speedy trial filed on April 8, 1971, was insufficient to constitute a valid demand for speedy trial, then under Rule 3.191 (i) (2) his trial on June 21, 1971 was well within the 180 day limit from the March 1, 1971 effective date of that rule. Secondly, assuming that his speedy trial demand was sufficient, nevertheless, he is not entitled to discharge for failure to file a valid written motion for discharge; in fact the written motion for discharge was not *100made until July 14, 1971, about 20 days after his conviction and sentence. Gossett v. Hanlon, Fla.App. 1967, 195 So.2d 865, 868; State ex rel Hanks v. Goodman, Fla. 1971, 253 So.2d 129; Rule 3.191(d)(1).

Affirmed.
z

N

!ic

€ :

o

E o:z<-2 3

etro

oL)o) o

ald

I R. o

x & Y;S

E c 6 ';:l

; t- rrz

=cE -$ EE E9g EE8E 9: iE Zns EFE* E: > !c o.di .8.6. aE :E n 9

is= g8<r? ;H5 Et g dNt

QPai. *lp de :

ll = E = = A E - ! F

:.egE ad€ Ec . F

1=5E Ecig EE A O

JOrr<, <-roo 04 < F

(3Nt1 O31IOO NO 1n9).. r..rr r r... r r....

IL

o

z

E.

o

z

z

I

E

, o '68

9EB

.=--

E;9

8j:

6 0 €

FEO

z

s

UJ

TA

F

i!<

(rcl

o - (rl)

r

r

E

o

t

r

z

kz

6 -

t!

o y

t^=

tq N

u*z r {

=- \ t

trN

o N

L h

l

z

< o = E

O O

2 o

Tgul; E <

?- E \ o

; ol<*

t> !l

Esa**E

E€€i ofg$

o

o

o

LJ

h

=3

Y $

F O

Uot

?

H(J Hhx G^Y

-Jn

Rg=

Yu< - <-F

!!oz

dRs

E

e qE

e€s

? 9#

'=v ;,q E=

fss

Pco

E.= q

s ie

R P F

F o S

Fb:

-oc

666

8.s +

e eE

- O*-

b< P

igg, g!EE

xs;e igEE *.E; e

:E;E

EEEF

EiEE

{

R

an

z

s

$

\

6 @

o o

N N

oi -j

- 6

o 0

o o

U

F

35

a ^

o <

U_E

F C

< x

O u

z

o

EE

o

2

z z

? 9

63

x3E

E1S =fr8

<ilF

bBt

;ud

iito

?44"

HEb

tro.u 3kz EEF F

btr

5 0

u

=F

c

E

z

o

N

s

z

o

Y

v.

e$ < z

> o Ftr

r=<

<x.

zj- o 9 tr('

<ur I z E -uro)uo F o

I
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7250 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7250

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to expand eligibility for the 
  surface transportation block grant program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2020

 Mr. Hastings introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to expand eligibility for the 
  surface transportation block grant program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farm-to-Market Road Repair Act of 
2020''.

SEC. 2. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM.

    Section 133 of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (E), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(G) roads in rural areas that primarily serve to 
                transport agricultural products from a farm or ranch to 
                a marketplace.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 
                (5); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following:
            ``(4) for a project described in subsection (b)(1)(G); 
        and''.
                                 <all>
```
<page>                                          EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey
A. Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.




By: /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name: 	 Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	 President

Date:	 March 31, 2006
<PAGE> 23

                                                                  Exhibit 12


           AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (Unaudited)



                                                         Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30,
                                                        2002          2001
                                                      (dollars in thousands)

Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $244,139      $219,588
  Interest expense                                     273,086       324,204
  Implicit interest in rents                             8,713         8,482

Total earnings                                        $525,938      $552,274


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $273,086      $324,204
  Implicit interest in rents                             8,713         8,482

Total fixed charges                                   $281,799      $332,686


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        1.87          1.66
Secretary of Natural Resources

TDD (804) 698

4021

www.deq.virginia.gov

(804) 698-4000

1-800-592-5482

SEP 272011!

Ms. Diana Esher, DirectorAir Protection Division (3AP00)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Reference:

RECEIVED

SEP 292010

Dlljii uileC(Qf (3APOO)NOx SIP Call Budget,

Revision K08

Dear Ms. Esher:

Pursuant to the requirements of § 110 ofthe Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting

approval of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan approved

and submitted under the authority of § 10.1-1 185 ofthe Code of Virginia and in accordance with

the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of

Implementation Plans).

This revision consists of a regulation (Article 10 of 9VAC5-140, Regulation for

Emissions Trading) that provides language to extend the NOx SIP Call Budget beyond the 2008ozone season. In reviewing the NOx SIP Call regulation it was determined that regulatory

language inadvertently ended the state budget in 2008. The language in 9VAC5-140-900identifies the budget for use in the years 2004 through 2008; however, there is no language to

continue the budget past the 2008 date which this regulatory action corrected. The regulationamendments were adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on October 23, 2008 under

the authority of § 10.1-1308 ofthe Code of Virginia.

Enclosed are the following:

1. A true copy ofthe official regulation (Revision K08) which was published in the

Virginia Register of Regulations on November 24, 2008 after being duly adoptedby the State Air Pollution Control Board on October 23, 2008, certified by the
DKP\mem

p

p

p

p

administrative procedures.

3. Public participation record.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know.

TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REGOO

SIP\NONATTN AREAS\2010\K08-SIP.DOC

Sincerely,

Enclosures
**Exhibit 24.13**
POWER OF ATTORNEY  
     KNOW ALL    MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Deborah J. Adler, a member of the Board of Directors    of ML Life Insurance Company of New York (the “Company”), whose    signature appears below, constitutes and appoints Barry G. Skolnick and Edward    W. Diffin, Jr., respectively, and each of them, her true and lawful attorney-in-fact    and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for her and    in her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all    Registration Statements and Amendments thereto, and to file the same, with    all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, under the    Investment Company Act of 1940, where applicable, and the Securities Act of    1933, respectively, with the Securities Exchange Commission, for the purpose    of registering any and all variable life and variable annuity separate accounts    (collectively “Separate Accounts”), of the Company that may be established    in connection with the issuance of any and all variable life and variable    annuity contracts funded by such Separate Accounts, granting unto said attorney-in-fact    and agent, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each    and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done.      Effective Date:            April 17, 2003 /s/ DEBORAH J. ADLER          Deborah J. Adler 
State of New JerseyCounty of Mercer  
     On the    4th day of April, 2003, before me came Deborah J. Adler, Director    of ML Life Insurance Company of New York, to me known to be said person and    he signed the above Power of Attorney on behalf of ML Life Insurance Company    of New York.  
    [SEAL] /s/ MARRIETTA ERNST          Notary Public