alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 167 (Wednesday, August 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 53135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20977]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that 
public notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, September 18, 2013, 4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Atomic Testing Museum, 755 E. Flamingo Road, Las 
Vegas, Nevada 89119.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Ulmer, Board Administrator, 
232 Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 
630-0522; Fax (702) 295-5300 or Email: NSSAB@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda:

1. Fiscal Year 2014 Work Plan Development
2. Election of Officers

    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will make every 
effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or special 
needs. If you require special accommodations due to a disability, 
please contact Barbara Ulmer at least seven days in advance of the 
meeting at the phone number listed above. Written statements may be 
filed with the Board either before or after the meeting. Individuals 
who wish to make oral presentations pertaining to agenda items should 
contact Barbara Ulmer at the telephone number listed above. The request 
must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comments can do so during the 15 
minutes allotted for public comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Barbara Ulmer at 
the address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on August 21, 2013.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-20977 Filed 8-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Commodity 2006 Pounds Applied 2007 Pounds Applied 2008 Pounds Applied

APPLE 1 BOK CHOY (WONG BOK) 5 3 2 BROCCOLI 97 77 60 BRUSSELS SPROUTS 11 30 11 CABBAGE 65 74 47 CAULIFLOWER 22 43 16 CELERY, GENERAL 48 61 31 CHICORY (ALL OR UNSPEC) 4 2 3 CHINESE CABBAGE (NAPPA, WON BOK, CELERY CABBAGE) 3 3 2 COLLARDS 13 14 8 CORN (FORAGE - FODDER) 2 CORN, HUMAN CONSUMPTION 1 COTTON, GENERAL 505 204 245 CUCUMBER (PICKLING, CHINESE, ETC.) 1 EGGPLANT (ORIENTAL EGGPLANT) 1 1 ENDIVE (ESCAROLE) 1 KALE 46 2 KOHLRABI 1 1 LETTUCE, HEAD (ALL OR UNSPEC) 492 459 387 LETTUCE, LEAF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 44 65 58 MUSTARD, GENERAL 9 7 6 N-GRNHS GRWN CUT FLWRS OR GREENS 1 1 PEAR 33 PEPPERS (CHILI TYPE) (FLAVORING AND SPICE CROP) 1 PEPPERS (FRUITING VEGETABLE), (BELL,CHILI, ETC.) 60 57 29 RADICCHIO 1 Publicly available data from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CADPR) was used to produce the following table outlining the pounds of Emamectin Benzoate used in California over the three most recent years available (2006 - 2008). 

### Emamectin Benzoate (122806) Cal. DPR Usage Data

SPINACH 31 1 SWISS CHARD (SPINACH BEET) 8 8 6 TOMATO 112 111 55 TOMATOES, FOR PROCESSING/CANNING 551 613 563 TURNIP, GENERAL 2 1 1 Grand Total 2062 1883 1535 Date Prepared: 07/14/10 Cal DPR Data: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm Empty cells indicate no available usage.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12657

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICAN CORPORATION,

a foreign corporation,

Plaintiff-Third Party Defendant 

Counter Defendant-Appellant,

versus

NORTH AMERICAN AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC.,

an Illinois Corporation, et al.,

Defendants,

EFN WEST PALM MOTOR SALES, LLC, 

an Illinois Limited Liability Company,

GENE KHAYTIN,

USCA11 Case: 23-12657 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 02/20/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Opinion of the Court 23-12657

ERNIE REVUELTA,

EDWARD W. NAPLETON,

GEOVANNY PELAYO,

individuals, et al., 

Defendants-Counter Claimants

Third Party Plaintiffs-Appellees,

HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY,

Third Party Defendant-Counter Defendant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 9:20-cv-82102-WM

____________________

Before WILSON, JORDAN, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon our review of the record and the parties’ response to 

the jurisdictional question, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

EFN West Palm Motor Sales, LLC’s stipulations of voluntary dismissal of its fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth 

USCA11 Case: 23-12657 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 02/20/2024 Page: 2 of 3
23-12657 Opinion of the Court 3

counterclaims against Hyundai Motor American Corporation, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), were invalid because that Rule generally does not permit dismissal of only 

particular claims or counterclaims within an action. See Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), 41(c); Rosell v. VMSB, LLC, 67 F.4th 1141, 

1144 (11th Cir. 2023); Esteva v. UBS Fin. Servs. Inc. (In re Esteva), 

60 F.4th 664, 675 (11th Cir. 2023); Klay v. United Healthgroup, Inc.,

376 F.3d 1092, 1106 (11th Cir. 2004). The district court’s subsequent orders adjudging those counterclaims dismissed pursuant to 

the stipulations were also ineffective to dismiss the counterclaims 

under Rule 41(a)(2). See Rosell, 67 F.4th at 1144.

We decline to construe the stipulations as seeking amendment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 or as abandonment of the counterclaims. The filings were labeled as stipulations of dismissal and expressly invoked Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the district court’s orders 

recognizing them explicitly accepted them as stipulations and contemplated dismissal under Rule 41. And unlike Hyundai’s explicit 

withdrawal, at trial, of one of its claims and the district court’s express recognition that the claim was abandoned, the parties have 

not pointed to anything in the record mentioning withdrawal or 

abandonment, at any time, of any counterclaim.

Accordingly, the counterclaims have not been resolved and 

remain pending before the district court, so we lack jurisdiction 

over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Supreme Fuels Trading FZE v. 

Sargeant, 689 F.3d 1244, 1246 (11th Cir. 2012).

USCA11 Case: 23-12657 Document: 26-1 Date Filed: 02/20/2024 Page: 3 of 3
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 25, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00436

- CR & 04

- 17

- 00437

- CR

David St uart BISHOP

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3325 & 2015CR3326

The Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of October, 2017

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32(d)**

 

**The Dayton Powerand Light Company**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officerof The Dayton Power and Light Company (the “Issuer”) hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2008, which this certificateaccompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Issuers as of the dates and for theperiods expressed therein.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thisstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuers and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
|  /s/  John J. Gillen                                           |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  John  J. Gillen                                               |
|  Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

Date: October 29,2008

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Issuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

1

----
#### DIVISION OF BOND FINANCE OF the DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES of the State of Florida, an agency and public body corporate of the State of Florida, and the Division of Building Construction and Maintenance of the Department of General Services, an agency of the State of Florida, Appellants, v. R. Bartow RAINEY et al., Appellees.

No. S-156.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 17, 1973.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Daniel S. Dearing, Chief Trial Counsel, Department of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, for appellants.

L. Ralph Smith, Jr., of Smith, Moore & Huey, Tallahassee, and David W. Foerster, of Jones, Foerster & Hodge, Jacksonville, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ„ concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3743]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. ER97-765-000]


Revelation Energy Resources Corporation; Notice of Issuance of 
Order

February 11, 1997.
    Revelation Energy Resources Corporation (RERC) submitted for filing 
a rate schedule under which RERC will engage in wholesale electric 
power and energy transactions as a marketer. RERC also requested waiver 
of various Commission regulations. In particular, RERC requested that 
the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by RERC.
    On January 31, 1997, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, 
Division of Applications, Office of Electric Power Regulation, granted 
requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
    Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to 
be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities 
or assumptions of liability by RERC should file a motion to intervene 
or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 
and 385.214).
    Absent a request for hearing within this period, RERC is authorized 
to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a 
guarantor, endorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of 
another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some 
lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and 
compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or 
appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that 
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by 
continued approval of RERC's issuances of securities or assumptions of 
liability.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is March 3, 1997. Copies of 
the full text of the order are available from the Commission's Public 
Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3743 Filed 2-13-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 10.40 2013 10-K






AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), is effective this 1st day of January, 2014 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Stephen T. Winn, an individual resident of the State of Texas (the “Executive”) with a residence at [***], and RealPage, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Employer”), having its chief offices at 4000 International Parkway, Carrollton, Texas 75007. 
WHEREAS, Executive and Employer entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated December 30, 2003, as amended (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
WHEREAS, Executive and Employer now wish to amend the Employment Agreement as of the Effective Date. 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements set forth below, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
	
			
	1.
	 
	Executive shall be entitled to receive, upon termination of employment following a Change in Control (as defined under the Company’s 2010 Equity Incentive Plan) or a Business Combination Transaction (as defined below), in addition to all other compensation payable under this Agreement following such Change In Control or Business Combination Transaction, all employee benefits to which Executive was entitled immediately prior to such termination, fully paid for the term of the severance Executive is entitled to upon such termination under this Agreement.  For purposes of this Agreement, a “Business Combination Transaction” shall be deemed to mean a transaction that results in: A. a merger or consolidation of the Employer with or into another entity in which the Employer shall not be the surviving entity; B. a dissolution of the Employer; C. a transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of the Employer in one transaction or a series of related transactions to one or more other persons or entities; or D. any “person” or “group” (as those terms are used in Sections 13(d) and 14(d) of the 1934 Act), other than Seren Capital L.P. and Stephen T. Winn or any Affiliate of Stephen T. Winn, or a trustee or other fiduciary holding securities under an employee benefit plan of the Employer, becoming the “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 of the 1934 Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Employer representing 40% or more of the combined voting power of the Employer’s then outstanding securities.

	2.
	 
	Except as set forth herein, the Employment Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, intending to be legally bound, have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement on the Signature Date. 


	
					
	 
	REALPAGE, INC.
	 

	 
	/s/ Timothy J. Barker 
	 

	 
	By: Timothy J. Barker 
	 

	 
	Its: Chief Financial Officer 
	 








	
					
	 
	Effective Date: 1/1/14
	 

	 
	/s/ Stephen T. Winn
	 

	 
	Stephen T. Winn, an individual
Oct. 22, 2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJerseyAve., SE Washington, DC 20590

Petitioner: Howard A. Leipzig 417 Oyster Road North Palm Beach, FL 33408 561-371-0269 Email: howieal@gmail.com

Subject: UAS Section 333 Exemption using the "Summary Grant" process.

ToWhom It May Concern, Iam a licensed Realtor in the State of Florida and I am requesting a Section 333 exemption so that I may be able to use my DJI Phantom 3 Professional for commercial operation in the taking of aerial real estate photos and videos for myown real estate customers, as well as other real estate agents and other Real Estate related projects. Iam a formerAir Force pilot and I have a Commercial Pilot license #1377082. Ido not have a current medical certificate but Ido have a valid Florida Driver's License that meets the medical requirementforthis exemption. Ialso have hundreds ofhoursflying radio control models and many hoursflying the DJI Phantom 2 as well. It is well known that sUASs are often considered superiorto helicopters dueto the lower cost of equipment, the reduction ofpersonnel needed to operate and maintain it, reduced noise and zero emissions. In addition to providing cost savings and having little to no impact on the environment, sUASs provide enhanced safety. These factors are in the best interest ofthe general public. Forthe reasons stated above, I am respectfully requesting that the FAA grantthe requested exemption as soon as possible.

The DJI Phantom 3 has a 3 axis camera gimbal and UHD video camera that can capture both video and stills photos. The frequently updated DJI software sets the height it flies above the ground and restricts operation in prohibited or airport control zones. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional also has afailsafe function which means that ifthe communication is lost, the aircraftwill automatically return to the takeoff point and will land safely. The Phantom 3weighs lessthan 3 pounds including the on board battery. A pre-flight inspection will always be done in accordance with the instruction manual. The radio transmitter used for controlling the sUAS is compliantwith the applicable regulations governing a radio transmitter in the 2.400GHzto 2.4835GHzfrequency range. I believe I meet all the requirementsthis exemption requires. Iam available for any additional information you might require.



### Yo
**uly,** _-;I



### #' **~~**

**--** Howard A. L ipzi t/ / Page 1Please refertoAttachments: A. Pertinent Regulations B. DJI Phantom 3 Professional factory manualliks.

AttachmentA: Regulationsfrom which this exemption has relevance: 14 C.F.R. Part21 14 C.F.R. 45.23 (b) 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) and (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9 (b)(2) 14 C.F.R. 91.103 14 C.F.R. 91.109 14 C.F.R. 91.119 14 C.F.R. 91.121Page 3 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) 

### & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.205 (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.215 14 C.F.R. (91.401

- 91.417)

Attachment B: Linkto all DJI user manuals: http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download

Page2
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 7234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3920]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research


Nominations of Topics for Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs); 
Extension for Submission of Topic Nominations

    The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research is extending the 
time of submission for nominations of topics to March 24, 1997. This 
notice was published in the Federal Register on December 23, 1996 (61 
FR 67554-67556).

    Dated: February 10, 1997.
Clifton R. Gaus,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-3920 Filed 2-14-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
254 La. 852

#### Ella Stark GRIFFITTS v. TIGER WELL SERVICE, INC. and Insurance Company of North America.

No. 50120.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: Tiger Well Service, Inc., and Insurance Company of North America applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Jefferson Davis. 226 So.2d 175.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
EX-10.31.8



 Exhibit 10.31.8 

SIXTH AMENDMENT TO ADDENDUM TO MORTGAGE SELLING AND 

SERVICING CONTRACT (EAF Agreement) 

This Sixth Amendment (the “Sixth Amendment”) to that Addendum To Mortgage Selling and Servicing Contract dated effective as of
July 1, 2012 (the “EAF Agreement”) by and between FANNIE MAE, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the United States (“Fannie Mae”) and GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC, a limited liability company organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware (“Servicer”), is hereby mutually agreed upon and entered into effective December 31, 2013. 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, Fannie Mae and Servicer desire to extend the Early Reimbursement Period during which Fannie Mae will make payment of certain
Periodic Early Reimbursement Amounts under the EAF Agreement, and to make certain other amendments to the EAF Agreement; 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual premises, covenants and conditions and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and upon terms and subject to the conditions set forth
herein, Fannie Mae and Servicer agree as follows: 
 Section 1. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein,
capitalized terms which are defined in the EAF Agreement, as amended hereby, are used herein as therein defined. 
 Section 2.
Early Reimbursement Period. The time period during which Fannie Mae will make payment of Periodic Reimbursement Amounts identified in the section of the EAF Agreement titled “Early Reimbursement Period” shall be extended from
December 31, 2013 to “March 31, 2014.” 
 Section 3. Renewal/Amendment Fee. One half percent (0.500%) per
annum of the Early Reimbursement Amount Limit, prorated from December 31, 2013 to the scheduled end of the Early Reimbursement Period (March 31, 2014), shall be payable as a renewal fee on the first business day after the effective date. 

Section 4. Continuing Effect of the EAF Agreement. Except as expressly amended hereby, the provisions of the EAF Agreement
are and shall remain in full force and effect. 
 Section 5. Counterparts. This Sixth Amendment to EAF Agreement may be
executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned parties has caused this Sixth Amendment to EAF Agreement to be duly executed in its name by one of
its duly authorized officers, all as of the date first above written. 








									
	FANNIE MAE	 		 	GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin H. John
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Cheryl Collins

	Name:	 	 Kevin H. John
	 		 	Name:	 	 Cheryl Collins

	Title:	 	 VICE PRESIDENT
	 		 	Title:	 	 SVP Treasurer

	Date:	 	 December 23, 2013
	 		 	Date:	 	 December 20, 2013