alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                                   EXHIBIT 27
                               MERIDIAN DATA, INC.
                             Financial Data Schedule
                           Article 5 of Regulation SX


     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements

Category                      Response              Category           Response
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000864568
<NAME>                    Meridian Data, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                 1000
<CURRENCY>                US dollars
<PERIOD-START>           JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>             DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                    1
<CASH>                        11,049
<SECURITIES>                   7,794
<RECEIVABLES>                  2,983
<ALLOWANCES>                     351
<INVENTORY>                    2,687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              24,294
<PP&E>                         2,305
<DEPRECIATION>                 1,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                24,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          8,647
<BONDS>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<COMMON>                     65,533
<OTHER-SE>                        0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 24,888
<SALES>                      17,541
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             17,541
<CGS>                        10,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                10,090
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             21,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>             (13,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         (13,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                (13,161)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (1.51)

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We have issued our report dated March 20, 2009 with respectto the consolidated financial statements and schedule in the Annual Report of A.D.A.M., Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatements of A.D.A.M., Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-07785, effective July 9, 1996, File No. 333-92403, effective December 9, 1999, File No. 333-65452, effective July 19, 2001, File No. 333-113848, effectiveMarch 23, 2004, File No. 333-140926, effective February 27, 2007, File No. 333-149358, effective February 22, 2008, and File No. 333-157594, effective February 27, 2009), and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-45294,effective September 15, 2000, and File No. 333-88540, effective June 3, 2002). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 20, 2009
##### 



EXHIBIT 3.1.2 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
ARGON ST, INC. ARGON ST, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the Company), does hereby certify that: FIRST: The Board of Directors of the Company (the Board), at a duly held meeting of the
Board on December 13, 2004, adopted a resolution amending the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Company, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling for a meeting of the stockholders of
the Company for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows: RESOLVED,that the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company be amended by changing
the Fourth Article thereof so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as
follows: The total number of shares of Common Stock that the corporation shall have
authority to issue is One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares, par value of One
Cent ($0.01) per share. SECOND: Thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of its Board, the stockholders of the Company,
at a duly held meeting on February 28, 2005, approved the amendment by the necessary number of
shares as required by statute. THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. (Signature on following page)




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be duly executed by the
undersigned this 15th day of March, 2005. COMPANY:ARGON ST, INC., a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Donald F. FultzName: Donald F. FultzTitle: Chief Financial Officer
#### W. C. ROURK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John B. LEVY et al., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 3601.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 28, 1971.

John B. Levy, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

Welton P. Mouton, Jr., Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.

*560Domengeaux, Wright & Bienvenu, by Mark Bienvenu, Lafayette, for 3rd party-defendant-appellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS THE APPEAL

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY, and CUL-PEPPER, JJ.

FRUGÉ, Judge.

The plaintiff-appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal in this cause. This is the second motion to dismiss that has been filed in this matter. The court earlier refused to dismiss this appeal because the record had not been transmitted to this court, and the court did not have sufficient information upon which to consider the motion. 247 So.2d 406 (La.App.3rd Cir., 1971).

This matter began as a suit on a promissory note. After hearing, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, W. C. Rourk. From this adverse judgment, an appeal was taken by the defendant, John B. Levy, et al.

The basis for the appellee’s motion to dismiss is that the record was not timely lodged in this court, due solely to the fault of the appellant.

The record reveals that the last extension of the return date made this appeal returnable on March 31, 1971. As of March 31st, the record was not lodged with this court. The appellee has attached an affidavit to his motion to dismiss executed by the Clerk of Court of Lafayette Parish. The affidavit states that the record had been prepared and would have been transmitted to this court prior to the return date, except that the fee of the Clerk of the District Court had not been paid by the appellant, and under Article 2126 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appellant must pay these costs three days prior to the return date.

The appellee has paid the cost of the Clerk of the District Court for the sole reason of having this record transmitted to the court so that the appeal might be dismissed for failure to have the record timely lodged. Several cases have held that the failure to pay the fees and costs of preparing and filing the record becomes moot if the appeal is in fact *timely*lodged with the appellate court. Matlock v. Allstate Insurance Company, 153 So.2d 776 (La.App.3rd Cir., 1963); Downey v. Bellue, 178 So.2d 778 (La.App.1st Cir., 1965). Since this record was not filed until June 23, 1971, and the return date, as last extended, was March 31, 1971, the record was not timely lodged. This omission was due solely to the appellant’s failure to pay the cost of preparing and transmitting the record. Thus, the appeal will be dismissed.

The motion is, therefore, granted, and the appeal is dismissed. The defendants-appellants to pay all costs.

Appeal dismissed.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 8.1

Subsidiaries and Certain Affiliates of Telefónica Chile

The following chart sets forth the organization of Telefónica Chiles subsidiaries and affiliates, all of which are Chilean corporations, except for TBS Celular Participaçoes S.A., which is a Brazilian
corporation. Percentage ownership information is as of December 31, 2007.

Telefónica Chiles business activities are managed through the following operating subsidiaries:



(*) Telefónica Chile holds 28.84% of Atento Chile S.A. through the additional equity interest of 1.4% from its subsidiaries Telefónica Larga Distancia and Telefónica Empresas.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                    5
<MULTIPLIER>              1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>        MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<PAGE>
       
<CAPTION>
                                        
EXHIBIT 27
          
          
      Crown Central Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries
                     Financial Data Schedule
            (In thousands, except per share amounts)

                                              
                                              Three Months End
                                              ed
                                               March 31, 19
                                              97
    <S>                                       <C>
    <CASH>                                       $(1,878)
    <SECURITIES>                                   30,215
    <RECEIVABLES>                                 105,019
    <ALLOWANCES>                                    (701)
    <INVENTORY>                                   124,674
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                              267,473
    <PP&E>                                        630,224
    <DEPRECIATION>                                331,710
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                600,073
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         214,214
    <BONDS>                                       126,862
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
    <PREFERRED>                                         0
    <COMMON>                                       49,507
    <OTHER-SE>                                    138,590
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  600,073
    <SALES>                                       394,513
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                              394,513
    <CGS>                                         361,708
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                 361,708
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                               28,857
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                (377)
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              3,501
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,423
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      699
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               724
    <DISCONTINUED>                                      0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
    <CHANGES>                                           0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      724
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .07
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     .07
                                              
                                              
                                              
        

</TABLE>
No. 10159.

#### Erie Railroad Co. *v.*Moore et al.

Decided February 25, 1908.

Error to Circuit Court of Portage county.

*Messrs. Cushing & Clarke*and *Mr. I. T. Siddall,*for plaintiff in error.

*Mr. J. FI. Nichols,*for defendants in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Shauck, C. J., Price and Spear, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule contains summary information extracted from the balance sheet and
statement of operations  found on pages 5 and 6 of Reinhold's 1996 Annual Report 
to Stockholders, which is incorporated herein by reference.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          1522
<SECURITIES>                                    1000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2324
<ALLOWANCES>                                     501
<INVENTORY>                                     1491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                5544
<PP&E>                                          7896
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1942
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          20
<OTHER-SE>                                      5699
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12540
<SALES>                                        13120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13120
<CGS>                                          10074
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1963)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2198)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.05) 
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April 15, 2010


BY:    /S/ DEBI KOKINOS
Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
ORIGINAL 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERA TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. 9327 

) 

ORDER EXTENDING THE ONE YEAR 

DEADLINE FOR FILING THE INITIAL DECISION 

Commission Rule 3.5I(a) requires that initial decisions be filed within one year 

following the issuance of the complaint, but allows the Administrative Law Judge to extend the . 

one year deadline by an additional period of up to sixty days, upon a finding of extraordinar 

circumstances. 16 C.F.R. § 3.51(a). The Complaint in this matter was issued on September 9, 

2008. One year from the issuance ofthe Complaint is September 9,2009. 

The trial in this matter commenced on May 12, 2009 and concluded on June 12,2009. 

Closing arguments were heard on August 20, 2009. Over 2,100 exhibits were admitted, 35 

witnesses testified, either live or by deposition, and there are 5,590 pages of tral transcript. The parties' proposed findings of fact, replies to proposed findings of 
 fact, post trial briefs, and reply 

briefs total 2,329 pages. The paries' final post trial briefs were filed on July 31,2009. 

The extensive record must be thoroughly reviewed. Additional time is necessar to 

properly develop the findings of fact and legal analysis. Accordingly, extraordinar 

circumstances are present. The one year deadline is hereby extended by an additional period of 

sixty days, extending the deadline for filing the Initial Decision in this case to November 9, 

2009. 

ORDERED: 

~~~
 

D. Michael appe i 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Date: September 8, 2009
Exhibit 32.2






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Laboratories, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I Enzo J. Vialardi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.












      /S/ ENZO J. VIALARDI
      --------------------
      Enzo J. Vialardi
      Chief Financial Officer
      November 12, 2003



<PAGE>
1

Memorandum To: Docket From: Barry

Garelick , OTAQ/OAR Date: June 16, 2011 Subject: L abeling for E85, mid - and high - level ethanol blends, and blender pumps There are currently

about 2 ,300 E85 pumps and 215 blender pumps dispensing mid - and high level gaso line - ethanol blends (ty picall y E20 or E30 and above) . 1 Both E85 and blender pumps generall y have labels or other signage that clearl y identifies mid - and hi gh - level ethanol blends as such and indicates which nozzle or selector button dispenses those highe r blends . Labels for these pumps also ty

pically make clear that mid - and high - l evel gasoline - ethanol blends are for flex - fuel vehicles (FFVs) only . This portion of the label reflects that introduction of these blends into commerce for use in any other vehicle s is prohibited under the Clean Air Act unless and until the particular blend receives a waiver and is registered under the Act. In addition, m isfueling or causing misfueling of other vehicles with mid - and high - level blends may constitute or cause t ampering with vehicle emission controls, which is also prohibited. EPA has previously

advised that retail stations selling mid - and high - level blends may reduce the risk of a violation by

clearl y marking the pumps dispensing those blends as for FFVs only . Below are some photographs of E85 and mid - level blender pumps that illustrate that the various blends are clearl y labeled , that the pumps differentiate between conventional gasoline and midand high - level ethanol blends , and that the labels generall y communicate that the mid - and high level ethanol blends are for FFVs only . The photographs were taken as part of the first comprehensive survey

of ethanol blender pumps.

1 The estimate for the number of E85 pumps is based on in fo rmation contained at this site: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/fuels/stations_counts.html The estimate for the number of blender pumps is based on information compiled by the Department of Energy, and is located here: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/technology_bulletin_0210.html234
#### Donald A. BOHL, et al., Petitioners, v. INTERNATIONAL ART GUILD, LTD., Etc. et al., Respondents.

No. 39766.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 8, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 14, 1970.

Certiorari denied.

THORNAL, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND 
THE NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON PAGES 2 THROUGH
8 OF THE COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD
ENDED JUNE 30, 1007 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                      1,465
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,649
<PP&E>                                           5,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,310
<BONDS>                                          3,609
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        521
<COMMON>                                           779
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,879
<SALES>                                          4,224
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,224
<CGS>                                            3,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (31)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    268
<INCOME-TAX>                                        90
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                171
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       171
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
        

</TABLE>
Christopher Harris General Counsel, NORA (Associatio n of Responsible Recyclers) Personal Communication with IEc

August 21, 2009

• Most used oil is from vehicles. It’s very difficult to determine how much of the used oil generated is on-spec versus off-spec without a detailed su rvey, but he would estimate that 20 percent is off-spec.

• Most used oil customers demand on-spec, so th e market for off-spec used oil is pretty small. He estimates that 15 to 18 percent of the market is for off-spec used oil. Some of this goes to power plants. He believes that EPA may have a database of off-spec used oil burners.