alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7342 

To require a report on accelerated payments to certain small business 

concerns, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2020 

Mr. CROW (for himself and Mr. BALDERSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To require a report on accelerated payments to certain small 

business concerns, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Small Busi5 nesses Contractor Prompt Payment Reporting Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON ACCELERATED PAYMENTS TO CERTAIN 

7 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

8 (a) REPORT.—Not later than 3 months after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act, the head of each Federal 

10 agency shall submit to Congress a report on the timeliness 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7342 IH

1 of payments made to a covered prime contractor. Such re2 port shall include— 

3 (1) the date on which the Federal agency began 

4 providing accelerated payments in accordance with 

5 section 2307(a)(2) of title 10, United States Code, 

6 or paragraphs (10) and (11) of section 3903(a) of 

7 title 31, United States Code, as applicable, to a cov8 ered prime contractor; 

9 (2) of contracts to which such sections apply, 

10 the amount and percentage of covered contracts with 

11 accelerated payment terms in accordance with such 

12 sections; and 

13 (3) whether and on what date the agency dis14 continued implementation of the Office of Manage15 ment and Budget Circular M–11–32 titled ‘‘Accel16 erating Payments to Small Businesses for Goods 

17 and Services’’ (issued September 14, 2011). 

18 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act: 

19 (1) COVERED PRIME CONTRACTOR.—The term 

20 ‘‘covered prime contractor’’ means— 

21 (A) a prime contractor (as defined in sec22 tion 8701 of title 41) that is a small business 

23 concern (as defined in section 3 of the Small 

24 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)); and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7342 IH

1 (B) a prime contractor that subcontracts 

2 with a small business concern. 

3 (2) COVERED CONTRACT.—The term ‘‘covered 

4 contract’’ means a contract entered into by a cov5 ered prime contractor— 

6 (A) on or after August 13, 2018, with re7 spect to a contract entered into the head of an 

8 agency (as defined in section 2302 of title 10, 

9 United States Code); or 

10 (B) on or after December 20, 2019, with 

11 respect to a contract entered into with the head 

12 of an agency (as defined in section 3901 of title 

13 31, United States Code). 

14 (3) FEDERAL AGENCY.—The term ‘‘Federal 

15 agency’’ has the meaning given ‘‘agency’’ in section 

16 551(a) of title 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert LEICHMAN, Jr.

No. 53630.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 6, 1973.

In re: Robert Leichman, Jr. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and for stay order.

Application denied. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the execise of our jurisdiction.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                      Exhibit 11

                               Dean Foods Company

                Computation of Basic and Diluted Income Per Share
                  (In thousands, except for per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                               Three Months Ended
                                                                               ------------------
                                                                          August 29,          August 30,
                                                                               1999                1998
                                                                        -----------         -----------

<S>                                                                     <C>                 <C>
     Income from Continuing Operations                                  $    27,835         $    22,913
     Loss from Discontinued Operations                                            -              (1,741)
                                                                        -----------         -----------
     Net Income                                                         $    27,835         $    21,172
                                                                        ===========         ===========


     BASIC INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
     Income from Continuing Operations                                  $       .71         $       .57
     Loss from Discontinued Operations                                            -                (.04)
                                                                        -----------         -----------
     Net Income                                                         $       .71         $       .53
                                                                        ===========         ===========

     Weighted average common shares outstanding                              39,290              40,023
                                                                        ===========         ===========


     DILUTED INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
     Income from Continuing Operations                                  $       .70         $       .56
     Loss from Discontinued Operations                                            -                (.04)
                                                                        -----------         -----------
     Net Income                                                         $       .70         $       .52
                                                                        ===========         ===========

     Adjusted weighted average common shares*                                39,911              40,983
                                                                        ===========         ===========
</TABLE>



*    Includes weighted average number of potential common shares outstanding.
     Potential common shares consist solely of outstanding options under the
     Company's stock option plan.
EXHIBIT 15INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Cubic Corporation

We
have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of March 31, 2002, and the related consolidated condensed statements of income and cash flows for
the three-and six-month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We
conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying
analytical procedures to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States, which will be performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based
on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

We
have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2001 and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated November 20, 2001, we expressed
an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet at September 30, 2001, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.



San
Diego, California
April 25, 2002

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 33-37556, No. 33-93896 and No. 333-31813 of The Wet Seal, Inc. on Form S-8
of our report dated March 16, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of The Wet Seal, Inc. for the year ended February 3, 2001.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
April 3, 2001

================================================================================
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

1.       Air Travel Services, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

2.       DFI, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

3.       O'Charley's Finance Company, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

4.       O'Charley's Management Company, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

5.       O'Charley's Restaurant Properties, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
         company

6.       O'Charley's Service Company, Inc., a Tennessee corporation

7.       O'Charley's Sports Bar, Inc., an Alabama corporation

8.       OCI, Inc., a Delaware corporation

9.       OPI, Inc., a Colorado corporation

10.      SRLS LLC 5001, a Delaware limited liability company

11.      SRLS LLC 5002, a Delaware limited liability company

12.      SRLS LLC 5003, a Delaware limited liability company

13.      SRLS LLC 5004, a Delaware limited liability company

14.      SRLS LLC 5005, a Delaware limited liability company

15.      SRLS LLC 5006, a Delaware limited liability company

16.      Stoney River Legendary Management, L.P., a Georgia limited partnership

17.      Stoney River, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

18.      Stoney River Management Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation

19.      99 Commissary, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

20.      99 Restaurants, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

21.      99 Restaurants of Boston, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company

22.      99 Restaurants of Massachusetts, a Massachusetts Business Trust

23.      99 Restaurants of Vermont, LLC, a Vermont limited liability company

24.      99 West, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation
255 La. 802

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Edmond K. RYAN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50445.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1970.

In re: Edmond K. Ryan applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of either our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Michael T. Furry,  President and Chief Executive Officer of Reinhold Industries,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     1. The Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December  31,
2003 of the Company (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section 13(a) or 15(d),  as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.

     The foregoing  certification  is being furnished  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350 and is not being  filed as part of the Report or as a  separate  disclosure
document.



/s/ MICHAEL T. FURRY
Michael T. Furry
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2004


     A signed  copy of this  written  statement  required  by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Feldschuh, M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor Corporation.





/s/ Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.Joseph FeldshcuhPresidentChief Executive OfficerChairman of the Board of DirectorsPrincipal Executive OfficerNovember 11, 2010










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Daxor Corporation and will be retained by Daxor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<page>                                     EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Diversified
Futures Fund III L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.


By: /s/ Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name: 	 Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	 Chief Financial Officer

Date:	 March 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8275-8276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Commercial Turf Products, Ltd. Joint Research, 
Development and Production Joint Venture

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 9, 1997, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Commercial Turf 
Products, Ltd. filed written

[[Page 8276]]

notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties and (2) 
the nature and objectives of the joint venture. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of invoking venture. The notifications were filed 
for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting recovery of 
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities to the parties are 
LESCO., Inc., Cleveland, OH and MTD Products, Inc., Valley City, OH.
    The nature and objectives of this venture are research, development 
and manufacturing production of commercial turf care equipment. The 
venture will include engineering, product development, and 
manufacturing. The manufacturing will be conducted in the United 
States. The products that are manufactured will be sold in the United 
States and potentially abroad.
Constance K. Robinson,
Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 97-4375 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### Samuel PROCTER v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden.

No. 62164.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1978.

In re: Samuel Procter, applying for supervisory writs and certiorari.

Writ denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth J. JOHNSON.

No. 61176.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Kenneth Johnson, applying for writs of mandamus and certiorari. Parish of Orleans. •

Denied.
#### GREYHOUND LINES, INC., a California corporation, Appellant, v. Melba I. CORY, Executrix of the Estate of Fay C. Cory, Deceased, Melba I. Cory, as Surviving Widow of Fay C. Cory, Deceased, Appellee.

No. 72-258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Tom Waddell, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<PAGE>

               EXHIBIT 15 - INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT



Board of Directors and Shareholders
Cubic Corporation


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of Cubic
Corporation as of December 31, 1999, and the related consolidated condensed
statements of income and cash flows for the three-month periods ended December
31, 1999 and 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be performed
for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements referred
to above for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September
30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented
herein) and in our report dated November 29, 1999, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the
information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet
at September 30, 1999, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to
the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.




                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
February 8, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 8044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4316]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and Industrial 
Innovation; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Design, Manufacture, and 
Industrial Innovation--(1194).
    Date and Time: March 11-12, 1997, 8:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: Room 370, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Persons: Dr. Kesh Narayanan, Head, Small Business 
Office, (703) 306-1391, Cheryl Albus, Program Analyst, Small 
Business Office, (703) 306-1391, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate SBIR Phase II proposals for 
commercial potential as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data such as salaries, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 USC 552b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 18, 1997.
Linda Allen-Benton,
Deputy Director, Division of Human Resource Management, Acting 
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-4316 Filed 2-20-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M