7226 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 32 / Tuesday, February 18, 1997 / Notices

DEAPRTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory

Commission

[Docket No. EG97–31–000, et al.]

Coastal Nanjing Power Ltd., et al.;

Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation

Filings

February 10, 1997.

Take notice that the following filings

have been made with the Commission:

1. Coastal Nanjing Power Ltd.

[Docket No. EG97–31–000]

Take notice that on January 31, 1997,

Coastal Nanjing Power, Ltd.

(‘‘Applicant’’), West Wind Building,

P.O. Box 111, Grand Cayman, Cayman

Islands, B.W.I., filed with the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission an

application for determination of exempt

wholesale generator status pursuant to

Part 365 of the Commission’s

Regulations.

Applicant, a Cayman Islands

Corporation intends to have an

ownership interest in certain generating

facilities in China. These facilities will

consist of a 72 MW (net) electric

generating facility located in Nanjing,

Jiangsu Province, China, including two

diesel-fired gas turbine units and related

interconnection facilities.

Comment date: February 28, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. The

Commission will limit its consideration

of comments to those that concern the

adequacy or accuracy of the application.

2. Louisiana Public Service Commission

v. Entergy Services, Inc.

[Docket No. EL97–26–000]

Take notice that on February 5, 1997,

the Louisiana Public Service

Commission filed a complaint under

Sections 205 and 206 of the Federal

Power Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 824 and 824e

against Entergy Services, Inc. as the

representative of Entergy Corporation

and its operating companies. The

complaint seeks a revision of the

Entergy System Agreement based upon

allegations that the terms of the

agreement, under current

circumstances, are unjust and

unreasonable. Specifically, the

complaint alleges that the absence of

any provision in the System Agreement

excluding curtailable load from the

determination of a company’s load

responsibility under the System

Agreement results in an unjust and

unreasonable cost allocation to

companies that do not cause these costs

to be incurred, and results in crosssubsidization among the companies.

Additionally, it is alleged that the

absence of any provision in MSS–3 for

allocating marginal energy costs to

customers that purchase energy under

Entergy’s ‘‘real time pricing’’ rate

schedules at the retail level

discriminates against a company that

offers real time pricing.

Comment date: March 12, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice. Answers to the

complaint shall be due on or before

March 12, 1997.

3. PowerNet, LG&E Power Marketing,

Inc., Koch Energy Trading, Inc.,

Kimball Power Company, Logan

Generating Company, Penn Union

Energy Services, L.L.C. Duke/Louis

Dreyfus L.L.C.

[Docket Nos. ER94–931–011, ER94–1188–

014, ER95–218–008, ER95–232–008, ER95–

1007–004, ER95–1511–003, and ER96–108–

007 (not consolidated)]

Take notice that the following

informational filings have been made

with the Commission and are on file

and available for inspection and

copying in the Commission’s Public

Reference Room:

On February 6, 1997, PowerNet filed

certain information as required by the

Commission’s April 22, 1994, order in

Docket No. ER94–931–000.

On February 3, 1997, LG&E Power

Marketing, Inc. filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s August

19, 1994, order in Docket No. ER94–

1188–000.

On February 5, 1997, Koch Energy

Trading, Inc. filed certain information as

required by the Commission’s January 4,

1995, order in Docket No. ER95–218–

000.

On January 13, 1997, Kimball Power

Company filed certain information as

required by the Commission’s February

1, 1995, order in Docket No. ER95–232–

000.

On February 3, 1997, Logan

Generating Company, L.P. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s June 28, 1995, order in

Docket No. ER95–1007–000.

On January 13, 1997, Penn Union

Energy Services, L.L.C. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s September 11, 1995,

order in Docket No. ER95–1511–000.

On February 6, 1997, Duke Louis

Dreyfus L.L.C. filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s

December 14, 1995, order in Docket No.

ER96–108–000.

4. Western Power Services, Inc.,

PowerTec International, LLC,

PowerMark LLC, BTU Power

Corporation, Thicksten Grimm

Burgum, Inc., Northeast Energy

Services, Inc., Atlantic City Electric

Company

[Docket Nos. ER95–748–007, ER96–1–005,

ER96–332–004, ER96–1283–003, ER96–

2241–002, ER96–2523–001, and ER97–243–

002 (not consolidated)]

Take notice that the following

informational filings have been made

with the Commission and are on file

and available for inspection and

copying in the Commission’s Public

Reference Room:

On February 6, 1997, Western Power

Services, Inc. filed certain information

as required by the Commission’s May

16, 1995, order in Docket No. ER95–

748–000.

On February 4, 1997, PowerTec

International, LLC filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s December 1, 1995, order

in Docket No. ER96–1–000.

On February 4, 1997, PowerMark LLC

filed certain information as required by

the Commission’s January 19, 1996,

order in Docket No. ER96–332–000.

On February 6, 1997, BTU Power

Corporation filed certain information as

required by the Commission’s April 24,

1996, order in Docket No. ER96–1283–

000.

On February 6, 1997, Thicksten

Grimm Burgum Incorporated filed

certain information as required by the

Commission’s September 16, 1996,

order in Docket No. ER96–2241–000.

On February 6, 1997, Northeast

Energy Services, Inc. filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s September 19, 1996,

order in Docket No. ER96–2523–000.

On February 5, 1997, Atlantic City

Electric Company filed certain

information as required by the

Commission’s January 6, 1997, order in

Docket No. ER97–243–000.

5. Ontario Hydro Interconnected

Markets, Inc.

[Docket No. ER97–852–000]

Take notice that on January 30, 1997,

Ontario Hydro Interconnected Markets

Inc. tendered for filing an amendment in

the above referenced docket.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

6. American Power Reserves Marketing

Company

[Docket No. ER97–1428–000]

Take notice that on January 24, 1997,

American Power Reserves Marketing
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 32 / Tuesday, February 18, 1997 / Notices 7227

Company (ARM Power) applied to the

Commission for (1) acceptance of ARM

Power’s Rate Schedule FERC No. 1; (2)

a disclaimer of jurisdiction over ARM

Power’s Power brokering activities; (3)

blanket authorization to sell electricity

at market-based rates; (4) waiver of

certain Commission Regulations; and (5)

such other waivers and authorizations

as have been granted to other power

marketers.

ARM Power intends to engage in

electric power and energy transactions

as a marketer and broker. ARM Power

is not in the business of generating,

transmitting, or distributing electric

power.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

7. Indiana Michigan Power Company

[Docket No. FA91–66–002]

Take notice that on September 25,

1995, Indiana Michigan Power

Company tendered for filing its refund

report in the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

8. Systems Energy Resources, Inc.

[Docket No. FA93–23–002]

Take notice that on January 31, 1997,

Systems Energy Resources, Inc.

tendered for filing its refund report in

the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

9. Canal Electric Company

[Docket No. FA93–30–001]

Take notice that on May 26, 1995,

Canal Electric Company tendered for

filing its refund report in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

10. Detroit Edison Company

[Docket No. FA93–65–002]

Take notice that on January 27, 1997,

Detroit Edison Company tendered for

filing its refund report in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

11. Florida Power Corporation

[Docket No. FA94–56–001]

Take notice that on December 3, 1996,

Florida Power Corporation tendered for

filing its refund report in the abovereferenced docket.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

12. Wisconsin Electric Power Company

[Docket No. FA95–25–001]

Take notice that on February 4, 1997,

Wisconsin Electric Power Company

tendered for filing its refund report in

the above-referenced docket.

Comment date: February 25, 1997, in

accordance with Standard Paragraph E

at the end of this notice.

Standard Paragraph

E. Any person desiring to be heard or

to protest said filing should file a

motion to intervene or protest with the

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,

888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C.

20426, in accordance with Rules 211

and 214 of the Commission’s Rules of

Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211

and 18 CFR 385.214). All such motions

or protests should be filed on or before

the comment date. Protests will be

considered by the Commission in

determining the appropriate action to be

taken, but will not serve to make

protestants parties to the proceeding.

Any person wishing to become a party

must file a motion to intervene. Copies

of this filing are on file with the

Commission and are available for public

inspection.

Lois D. Cashell,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 97–3891 Filed 2–14–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Hearings and Appeals

Implementation of Special Refund

Procedures

AGENCY: Office of Hearings and Appeals,

Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of implementation of

special refund procedures and

solicitation of comments.

SUMMARY: The Office of Hearings and

Appeals of the Department of Energy

announces procedures concerning the

refunding of $214,236.37 (plus accrued

interest) in consent order funds. The

funds are being held in escrow pursuant

to a Consent Judgment and a

Bankruptcy Distribution involving

Houma Oil Company and Jedco, Inc.,

respectively.

DATE AND ADDRESS: Applications for

Refund should be addressed to the

Office of Hearings and Appeals,

Department of Energy, 1000

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC. 20585–0107. All

Applications should conspicuously

display a reference to either Case

Number VEF–0023 (Houma Oil Co.) or

VEF–0024 (Jedco, Inc.).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Richard W. Dugan, Associate Director,

Office of Hearings and Appeals, 1000

Independence Avenue, SW.,

Washington, DC. 20585–0107, (202)

426–1575.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In

accordance with § 205.282(c) of the

procedural regulations of the

Department of Energy, 10 CFR

205.282(c), notice is hereby given of the

issuance of the Decision and Order set

forth below. The Decision relates to a

Consent Judgment entered into by the

Houma Oil Company which settled

possible pricing violations in the firm’s

sales of motor gasoline during the

period May 1, 1979 through April 30,

1980. The Decision also relates to a

Bankruptcy Distribution which settled

pricing violations stemming from Jedco,

Inc.’s sales of motor gasoline during the

period November 1, 1973 through

March 31, 1974. A Proposed Decision

and Order tentatively establishing

refund procedures and soliciting

comments from the public concerning

the distribution of the Houma and Jedco

settlement funds was issued on October

28, 1996. 61 FR 57868 (November 8,

1996).

The Decision sets forth the procedures

and standards that the DOE has

formulated to distribute funds remitted

by Houma and Jedco and being held in

escrow. The DOE has decided that the

funds should be distributed in two

stages in the manner utilized with

respect to consent order funds in similar

proceedings. In the first stage, the DOE

will consider claims for refunds made

by firms and individuals that purchased

motor gasoline from Houma and/or

Jedco during the respective audit

periods.

The second stage of the refund

process will take place only in the event

that the meritorious first stage

applicants do not deplete the settlement

funds. Any funds that remain after all

first stage claims have been decided will

be distributed to state governments for

use in four energy conservation

programs, in accordance with the

provisions of the Petroleum Overcharge

Distribution and Restitution Act of l986.

All first stage applications should be

submitted within 90 days of publication

of this notice. All comments and

applications received in this proceeding

will be available for public inspection

between the hours of 1 to 5 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, except federal