alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               5,400
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,713,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                       259,914
<INVENTORY>                                      4,153,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,778,684
<PP&E>                                           4,114,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,342,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,628,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,600,774
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         5,929,327
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,628,216
<SALES>                                          5,150,376
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,150,376
<CGS>                                            5,249,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,314,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,466,222)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (591,893)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,874,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,874,329)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.20)



</TABLE>
Exhibit  99.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datametrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 28, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greg S.
Lipsit, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/  GREG  S.  LIPSIT
------------------------------
Greg  S.  Lipsit
Chief  Accounting  Officer
October 7, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6761-6762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Jointly Owned Invention Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a jointly owned invention available for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is jointly owned by the U.S. 
Government, as represented by the Department of Commerce and the 
University of Colorado, as represented by the Board of Regents of the 
University of Colorado. The U.S. Government's ownership interest in 
this invention is available for licensing in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 
207 and 37 CFR part 404 to achieve expeditious commercialization of 
results of federally funded research and development.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical and licensing information on 
this inventions may be obtained by writing to: Marcia Salkeld, National 
Institute of Standards and Technology, Industrial Partnerships Program, 
Building 820, Room 213, Gaithersburg,

[[Page 6762]]

MD 20899; Fax 301-869-2751. Any request for information should include 
the NIST Docket No. and Title for the relevant invention as indicated 
below.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NIST may enter into a Cooperative Research 
and Development Agreement (``CRADA'') with the licensee to perform 
further research on the invention for purposes of commercialization. 
The invention available for licensing is:

NIST Docket No. 94-010

    Title: Process for Fabrication of Improved Resistive 
Microbolometers.
    Description: In this relatively uncomplicated and reproducible 
process for fabricating microbolometers, an ultrathin layer of niobium 
is used as the detector element, and the wafer is cleaned in situ in a 
low-pressure evaporation system, to provide an instrument having a 
substantially lower noise level than conventional microbolometers.

    Dated: February 6, 1997.
Elaine Bunten-Mines,
Director, Program Office
[FR Doc. 97-3524 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M
#### In re ESTATE of Jerome J. McISAAC, Deceased.

No. 73-666.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 31, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Balance Sheet, Cash Flow and Statement of Operations and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         385,640
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,947,266
<INVENTORY>                                  2,181,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,215,909
<PP&E>                                       1,118,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                 820,408
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,523,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,478,586
<LT DEBT>                                      162,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,604,459
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,722,389)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,523,578
<SALES>                                     18,850,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,850,294
<CGS>                                        5,083,148
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,083,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             235,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                920,562
<INCOME-TAX>                                   360,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            560,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   560,562
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00099-CV

ANTHONY W. SPENCER

v.

CORPUS CHRISTI REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2015-CCV-62138-5

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 23, 2018
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6707

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGORY WHISONANT, a/k/a Geez,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:17-cr-00191-ELH-1; 1:19-cv-02002-ELH)

Submitted: October 22, 2020 Decided: October 27, 2020

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Whisonant, Appellant Pro Se. Brandon Keith Moore, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Whisonant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Whisonant has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Whisonant’s motion for a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>   1




EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the persons whose signatures appear
below, constitute and appoint Robert L. Smialek, Kenneth H. Koch, and David A.
Kauer, and each of them as their true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for them and in their names,
places, and steads, in any and all capacities, to sign the Insilco Corporation
Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any amendments thereto, pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1997, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and
the other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all
intents and purposes as they might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their
or his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.


DATED: June 23, 1998



/s/ Robert L. Smialek                    /s/ David A. Kauer
----------------------                   ----------------------
Robert L. Smialek                        David A. Kauer


/s/ Terence M. O'Toole                   /s/ Barry S. Volpert  
----------------------                   ----------------------
Terence M. O'Toole                       Barry S. Volpert


/s/ Thomas E. Petry                      /s/ James J. Gaffney  
----------------------                   ----------------------
Thomas E. Petry                          James J. Gaffney
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32853]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Previously Held Emergency Meeting

    Time and Date: 9:09 a.m., Thursday, December 11, 1997.
    Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters Considered:
    1. Personnel Actions. Closed Pursuant to exemptions (2), (5), 
(6) and (9)(B).
    2. Matters Relating to OPM Report. Closed pursuant to exemptions 
(2) and (6).
    The Board voted unanimously that Agency business required that a 
meeting be held with less than the usual seven days advance notice, 
that it be closed to the public, and that earlier announcement of 
this was not possible.
    The Board voted unanimously to close the meeting under the 
exemptions stated above. Deputy General Counsel James Engel 
certified that the meeting could be closed under those exemptions.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Baker, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone (703) 518-6304.
Becky Baker,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-32853 Filed 12-11-97; 5:12 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
**EXHIBIT 15**

** **

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Cubic Corporation

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of CubicCorporation as of December 31,2009, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cashflows for the three months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.  These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the PublicCompany Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial informationconsists principally of applying analytical procedures, and making inquiries ofpersons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than anaudit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is theexpression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such anopinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modificationsthat should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referredto above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accountingprinciples.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidatedbalance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30, 2009 and therelated consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity andcash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our reportdated December 9, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on thoseconsolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth inthe accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30,2009, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to theconsolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

 
|                   | /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP |
|------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                   |                            |
|                   |                            |
| San Diego, California  |                            |
| February 8,  2010 |                            |

 

----
IMPORTANT NOTICE ABOUT E.K. EKCESSORIES

ADVERTISING AND MARKETING

Dear Distributor:

In response to a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), E.K. Ekcessories, Inc. (EK) has agreed not

to make claims that products are made in the United States unless the referenced product is all or virtually all made in

the United States.  This is because the FTC has alleged that EK marketed certain products as made in the United States,

when, in some instances, the products or certain components of those products were made outside the United States.  

Therefore, EK requests that you immediately stop using existing E.K. Ekcessories marketing materials, if any, that either:  

(1) describe all EK products, or (2) specifically describe [affected products], as made in the United States, of U.S.‐origin,

or “Truly Made in the USA.”  Where applicable, EK will make revised marketing materials available to you shortly.

Furthermore, to the extent that you have EK‐packaged products that are part of the iCat, Dri Cat, Key biner,

Card Holder, or Bottle Cat lines in your possession with U.S.‐origin claims on the packaging materials, we have included

stickers that you should affix to the product packaging to cover claims that the items are made in the United States.  

Please find the enclosed instruction sheet, which will provide you with directions as to how to apply the stickers

correctly.

Should you have any questions about compliance with this notification, please contact [Randall Anderson or

Cort Saxton].  In addition, further information about this settlement can be obtained by visiting www.ftc.gov and

searching for “E.K. Ekcessories.”

Sincerely,

Randall Anderson

Chief Operating Officer

E.K. Ekcessories

     575 West 3200 South     435‐753‐8448   

Logan, Utah            

         

   

Attachment A
Presidential Documents

67547

Federal Register

Vol. 62, No. 247

Wednesday, December 24, 1997

Title 3—

The President

Memorandum of December 19, 1997

Delegation of Authority Under Section 1212 of the National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law

105–85)

Memorandum for the Secretary of Commerce

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of

the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United

States Code, I hereby delegate the functions and authorities conferred upon

the President by section 1212 of the National Defense Authorization Act

for Fiscal Year 1998 (Public Law 105–85) to the Secretary of Commerce,

who is authorized to redelegate these functions and authorities consistent

with applicable law.

Any reference in this memorandum to the provision of any Act shall be

deemed to include references to any hereafter-enacted provision of law

that is the same or substantially the same as such provision.

You are authorized and directed to published this memorandum in the

[FR Doc. 97–33838

Federal Register.

THE WHITE HOUSE,

Washington, December 19, 1997.

œ–

Filed 12–23–97; 8:45 am]

Billing code 3510–BP–M
Exhibit 12





AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Unaudited)







|                                                   | Three Months Ended     |          | Six Months Ended
|-------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | -------- | ----------------
|                                                   | June 30,               |          | June 30,        
|                                                   | 2005                   | 2004     |                 
|                                                   | (dollars in thousands)
|Earnings:
Income before provision for income taxes | $207,660               | $168,646 |                 
|Interest expense                                   | 216,704                | 146,900  |                 
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 4,655                  | 4,400    |                 
|Total earnings                                     | $429,019               | $319,946 |                 
|Fixed charges:
Interest expense                    | $216,704               | $146,900 |                 
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 4,655                  | 4,400    |                 
|Total fixed charges                                | $221,359               | $151,300 |                 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 | 1.94                   | 2.11     |                 







33
#### Judith G. FLIGELMAN, Appellant, v. Daniel L. FLIGELMAN, Appellee.

No. 71-940.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 15, 1973.

*200William John Mason, Miami, for appellant.

Graham Miller, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HAVER-FIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In a divorce action completed prior to the effective date of the no fault divorce law (Ch. 71-241) the plaintiff wife was granted a divorce, $15,000 lump sum alimony, $50 per week support for a child of the parties aged sixteen years, and alimony of $25 per week for a limited period, to terminate when the minor should become “emancipated,” or sooner if the wife remarried. The marital residence, valued at $55,000 was owned by the husband. A claim by the wife of an equity therein was rejected by the trial court. There were two children of the marriage, one of whom had attained majority. The wife was granted custody of the minor child, above referred to, and was granted the right to continue to reside with the child in the marital residence during the minority of said child, with the husband required to pay mortgage payments, taxes, insurance and major maintenance expenses thereon. An allowance of $2,500 attorney fee was made for the services of the wife’s attorney.

On appeal therefrom by the wife it was argued the trial court erred in denying her claim of an interest or equity in the residence premises and that the awards of alimony and attorney’s fee were inadequate and represented an abuse of discretion.

We affirm the judgment except for the award of periodic alimony, as to which we agree with the contention of the appellant that said award was inadequate in the circumstances. The marriage had existed for 23 years. There was evidence that the wife had the capacity to earn money, but her earnings in recent years, as shown in the evidence, had not exceeded $300, and in one year $400. The husband was shown to have assets, including a going business, amounting to approximately $200,000.

Accordingly, the judgment is modified and amended to provide, as to the periodic alimony, that the defendant husband shall pay to the plaintiff wife alimony in the amount of $50 per week until her remarriage or death, and that such increase in the periodic alimony shall be retroactive to the date of the divorce judgment; provided, however, that either party may apply to the trial court for further modification of the judgment as to the amount of periodic alimony, based on future changes in the circumstances of the parties if such shall occur, as provided for in § 61.14 Fla. Stat., F.S.A.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed in part, reversed in part and modified and amended, as hereinabove set forth.
#### Henry L. EDWARDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

May 26, 1971.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1971.

Roland F. Cribbs, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and P. A. Pacyna, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of State v. Padilla, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 309.

PIERCE, C. J., and LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.