alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67352-67353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP98-90-000]


K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co.; Notice of Tariff Filing

December 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 15, 1997, K N Interstate Gas 
Transmission Company (KNI) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume 1-C and Second Revised Volume 1-D, to be 
effective January 15, 1998:

Second Revised Volume No. 1-C
All Tariff Sheets
Second Revised Volume No. 1-D
All Tariff Sheets

    KNI states that these tariff sheets are being filed pursuant to 
Section 154.204 of the Commission's regulations. KNI further states 
that it is submitting for filing and acceptance the above revised 
tariff sheet(s) related to the Commission's Order issued on August 1, 
1996 in Docket Nos. RP94-328-001 and RP95-81-000 granting KNI's 
petition for a declaratory order that it lacks market power for its 
Buffalo Wallow System.
    KNI states that copies of the filing were served upon KNI's 
jurisdictional customers, interested public bodies and all parties to 
the proceeding.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to this filing should file a motion to intervene or protest 
with the Federal Energy

[[Page 67353]]

Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.211 and 385.214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure. All such motions or protests must be 
filed in accordance with section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests filed with the Commission will be considered by 
it in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not 
serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing 
to become a party must file a petition to intervene in accordance with 
the Commission Rules. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33521 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Willie Ellis LANIER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-389.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 3, 1973.

Jon D. Caminez, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., A. C. J., and WIGGINTON, and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
#### Leroy POSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-962.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 11, 1970.

Leroy Poss, in pro. per.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After a jury trial, the appellant was found guilty of the crime of robbery, and sentenced on March 6, 1959, to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for the remainder of his natural life. The record reveals substantial evidence of appellant’s guilt, and the trial was regular in all respects. This is an appeal from a denial of appellant’s fifth motion to vacate judgment and sentence.1

Appellant presents seven points on appeal. Points one and five claim that appellant was ineffectively represented by private counsel. We have read the record and find no basis for this allegation. In addition, see Humphries v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 23.

Point two was raised here before and, although not discussed, decided adversely to appellant in Poss v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 845. Point three does not present grounds for relief. See United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 87 S.Ct. 1926, 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 1967, 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967). Point four is covered by State v. Hernandez, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 109. Point six is not a ground for relief. See Powe v. State, Fla.1968, 216 So.2d 446. Point seven is refuted by the record. See Fast ,v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 203.

Affirmed.

1

. See Poss v. State, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 845; Poss v. State, Fla.App.1965, 178 So.2d 631; Poss v. State, Fla.1966, 188 So.2d 314.
#### BEEFY KING INTERNATIONAL OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellant, v. David KERBEN et al., Appellees.

No. 74-152.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Frederick Pfeiffer, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 12.1

Niska

Niska PredecessorYear Ended March 31,

Period from
May 12, 2006
to March 31,
20072011

2010

2009

2008Earnings:Net earnings (loss) before income taxes


27,403


121,149


96,949


44,965


41,358Less: capitalized interest


(2,018
)

(574
)







Total earnings


25,385


120,575


96,949


44,965


41,358Fixed Charges:Interest and debt expense


77,007


38,119


53,486


73,853


60,188Capitalized interest


2,018


574








Portion of rentals representing an interest factor


1,079


653


490


573


293Total fixed charges


80,104


39,346


53,976


74,426


60,481Earnings (deficit) available for (applied to) fixed charges


105,489


159,921


150,925


119,391


101,839Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


1.3x


4.1x


2.8x


1.6x


1.7x


---



QuickLinks
FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUBSERVICING AGREEMENT


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT
TO SUBSERVICING AGREEMENT (“First Amendment”) dated as of February 19, 2004 by and between Crescent Mortgage Company
(“Owner/Servicer”) and Cenlar FSB (“Subservicer”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS,
Owner/Servicer and Subservicer entered into a certain Subservicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2004; and


WHEREAS,
Owner/Servicer and Subservicer desire to amend the Agreement further as set forth below.


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual recitals, promises and covenants set forth in this First Amendment and in the Agreement, and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


		1.	Capitalized terms used and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.



		2.	Article VI of the Agreement, Representations,
Warranties and Covenants of Owner/Service is amended to add a new Section 6.6 to read as follows:



6.6 Predatory
Lending Regulations; High Cost Loans.


None of the Mortgage(s) are classified
as (i) “high cost” loans under the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994 or (ii) “high cost”,
“threshold”, “covered” or “predatory” loans under any other applicable state, federal or local
law.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this First Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first indicated above.





	ATTEST:	 	CRESCENT MORTGAGE COMPANY	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	   /s/ Jay Hood	 	By:	   /s/ Robert C. KenKnight	 
	Name/Title: Jay Hood, Vice Pres.	 	Name/Title:  Robert C. KenKnight, President	 
	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	CENLAR FSB	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By: 	   /s/ Joan M. Heras	 	By: 	   /s/ Gregory S. Tornquist	 
	Joan M. Heras, Asst. Secretary	 	Gregory S. Tornquist, Senior Vice President
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
63246 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 228 / Wednesday, November 26, 1997 / Rules and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 27 and 29

[Docket No. 29008; Amendment No. 27–34,

29–41]

Normal and Transport Category

Rotorcraft Regulations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation

Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Technical amendments;

confirmation of effective date.

SUMMARY: This document confirms the

effective date for the technical

amendments to the airworthiness

standards for normal and transport

category rotorcraft under CFR parts 27

and 29.

EFFECTIVE DATE: The rule is effective on

November 28, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary June Bruner, FAA, Forth Worth,

Texas 76193–0111, telephone (817)

222–5118.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA

published the technical amendments;

request for comments in the Federal

Register on August 29, 1997 (62 FR

46172). The FAA uses the direct final

rulemaking procedure for a

noncontroversial rule where the FAA

believes that there will be no adverse

public comment. The technical

amendments document advised the

public that no adverse comments were

anticipated, and that unless a written

adverse comment or a written notice of

intent to submit such an adverse

comment were received within the

comment period, the technical

amendments would become effective on

November 28, 1997. No adverse

comments were received, and thus this

notice confirms that the technical

amendments will become effective on

that date.

Issued in Washington, DC on November 21,

1997.

Donald P. Byrne,

Assistant Chief Counsel for Regulations.

[FR Doc. 97–31105 Filed 11–25–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
#### STATE of Louisiana v. L’Dee J. SMITH.

No. 60084.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

James A. Hobbs, Blackwell, Chambliss, Hobbs & Henry, West Monroe, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Carl Parker-son, Dist. Atty., John R. Harrison, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Ernest TOWNSEND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-841.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1974.

Ernest Townsend, in pro per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined1 and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw *276as counsel for the indigent defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto,’ on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.
June 9, 2009

Mr. William C. Early (3RAOO)Regional AdministratorU. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Region III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Dear Mr. Early:

I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State of Delaware State Implementation Plan

(SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone. The

revision is entitled Regulation No. 1141 — LIMITiNG EMISSIONS OF VOLATILE ORGANIC

COMPOUNDS FROM CONSUMER AND COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, Section 2.0 --Consumer

Products and Section and Section 4.0 — Adhesives and Sealants. The effective date ofthese revisions isApril 11, 2009.

The requirements of the CAA Section 11 0(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public

hearing process established by the State of Delaware with proper notification (30 days) prior to theconvening of the public hearing. A public hearing was held on January 28, 2009. Attachments A and Bare copies of affidavits as proof of proper notification. It is the position of the State of Delaware that all

minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met.

We look forward to continuing the cooperative effort between Delaware and EPA in this

important work. As always, feel free to contact me or Ali Mirzakhalili, Administrator, (302) 739-9402, if

you have any questions conceming the enclosed documents.

SinceSecretary

cc: Diana Esher, EPA w/encl.

James Werner, Director, DAWM

Ali Mirzakhalili

Vetaccate 4 9ood ljatate deftec.reü 0% 9041
No. 00-6846.

#### Brown *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).
SERVED JANUARY 11,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.\C 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SOUTHWEST AIRFRAME AND TANK SERVICES, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CPSOOOIO 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2009-0723 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER 

DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

Counsel for the Respondent has withdrawn Respondent's request for a 

hearing, stating that the parties have settled the dispute between them. 

In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to § 13.215 of the 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is 

hereby dismissed with prejudice, and the docket is closed. 

The hearing scheduled for January 12, 2010 is cancelled. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP09SO0010 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

CORRECTED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

John Stewart, President and General Manager 

Southwest Airframe and Tank Services, Respondent 

9840 Monroe Drive 

Suite 105 

Dallas, TX 75220 

TEL: 214-902-8223 

FAX: 214-902-8273 

Jason Dickstein, Respondent's Counsel 

Washington Aviation Group, PC and the Law Offices of Jason Dickstein 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W. Ste. 503 

Washington, DC 20007 

TEL: 202-628-6776 

FAX: 202-628-8948 

Gerald A. Ellis, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 21.1

                              List of Subsidiaries
                              --------------------

BE AEROSPACE, INC.
     BE Aerospace (USA), LLC
     Acurex, LLC
     Nordskog Industries, Inc.
     B/E Aerospace Services, LLC
     Advanced Thermal Sciences Corporation
              ATS Japan Corporation
                       Advanced Thermal Sciences Taiwan Corporation
                       Advanced Thermal Sciences Korea
              Advanced Thermal Sciences Shanghai Corporation
              Modoc Engineering Corporation
     Aerospace Lighting Corporation
     BE Aerospace Australia, Inc.
     BE Aerospace Canada, Inc.
              B/E Aerospace (Canada) Company
     BE Aerospace El Salvador, Inc.
              BE Aerospace El Salvador, Sociedad Amonima de Capital Variable
     B/E Aerospace Development Corporation
     BE Intellectual Property, Inc.
     B/E Aerospace Machined Products, Inc.
     Bomhoff Acquisition, Inc.
     Composite Specialties, Inc.
     DMGI, LLC
     Denton Jet Interiors, LLC
     Flight Structures, Inc.
     IFE Sales, LLC
     Maynard Precision, LLC
     Modern Metals, LLC
     Nelson Aerospace, LLC
     M & M Aerospace Hardware, Inc.
              M & M Aerospace Hardware SARL
              M & M Aerospace Hardware GmbH
              M & M Aerospace Hardware Ltd.
              M & M Aerospace Hardware Ptc. Ltd.
     CMP SAS
     T.L. Windust Machine, LLC
     BE Aerospace Netherlands BV
              B/E Aerospace Services B.V.
              Koninkliijke Fabriek Inventum BV (Royal Inventum)
     BE Aerospace (UK) Holdings Limited
              BE Aerospace (Germany) GmbH
              CF Taylor (B/E) UK Limited
                       B/E Aerospace (UK) Limited
     BE Aerospace (France) SARL
     Burns Aerospace Europe (SARL)
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 242 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 242

 To amend title 11 of the United States Code to increase the amount of 
                   the allowable homestead exemption.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2021

 Ms. Dean (for herself and Mr. Nadler) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 11 of the United States Code to increase the amount of 
                   the allowable homestead exemption.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Homeowners in Bankruptcy 
Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION.

    Section 522 of title 11 of the United States code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(1) by striking ``$15,000'' and 
        inserting ``$100,000''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(r) Notwithstanding any other provision of applicable 
nonbankruptcy law, a debtor in any State may exempt from property of 
the estate the property described in subsection (d)(1) not to exceed 
the value in subsection (d)(1) if the exemption for such property 
permitted by applicable nonbankruptcy law is lower than that amount.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act 
shall not apply to cases commenced under title of the United States 
Code before the effective date of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jessie MARLOW et ux., et al., Petitioners, v. Lois O’Steen BODIFORD, Respondent.

No. 43936.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 12, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 552.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.

DEKLE, J., dissents.
#### Henry Molina et al., Appellants, v Lorelei J. Sercia, Respondent.

[736 NYS2d 231]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Berke, J.), entered March 19, 2001, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see, Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557). The defendant had neither a statutory nor a common-law duty to provide window guards in the subject apartment, since no one under 10 years of age resided there *(see, Deer v DiPiazza,*225 AD2d 514; *Costanzo v New York City Hous. Auth.,*158 AD2d 576; *Ramos v 600 W. 183rd St.,*155 *426AD2d 333). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320). Altman, J.P., Adams, Townes and Prudenti, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-99764, 33-41474, 333-50298, 333-111513, 333-135832, 333-135831) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-
  130111) of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 27, 2008 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
  reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York, New YorkFebruary 28, 2008



---
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                             -----------------------


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

                                       to

                                    FORM 10-Q

                      FOR THE QUARTER ENDED AUGUST 31, 2002

                QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                             -----------------------


                   CONTINENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION

             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


EXHIBIT                          DESCRIPTION
NUMBER
-------  ------------------------------------------------------------------

 99.1    Certification of Chief Executive and Financial Officer Pursuant to
         Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




<PAGE>


                   CONTINENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
                      10-Q - Quarter Ended August 31, 2002

Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, JONAH M. MEER, certify that:
      The Form 10-Q of CONTINENTAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION for the
      period ended August 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CONTINENTAL
      INFORMATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION for the periods presented.

This certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by CONTINENTAL INFORMATION
SYSTEMS CORPORATION for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


Date:  October 15, 2002

                                  By:      /s/ Jonah M. Meer
                                           ---------------------------
                                  Name:    Jonah M. Meer
                                  Titles:  Chief Executive Officer, Chief
                                           Financial Officer, Chief Operating
                                           Officer and Director