alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                          TUDOR FUND FOR EMPLOYEES L.P.

                            c/o Second Management LLC
                                1275 King Street
                               Greenwich, CT 06831

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 March 28, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Second Management
LLC has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP
("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
this audit.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                Tudor Fund For Employees L.P.
                                                By:  Second Management LLC,
                                                     General Partner

                                                /s/ John R. Torell

                                                John R. Torell
                                                Managing Director and Chief
                                                Financial Officer
## 509

,. OFFICE OF THE ATA-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

AUBTIN ’ z”-,y” ‘

.

,.



### EonorablhCeo. E. Sheppard Oozptroller

of Public Locounts Austin,Texas

t the appropriations ital Statlstioe

nlonNo. O-l.394 A. Cavis, State he specialVital ropriotionsin th Ltq$.slature, he State Eealth cnles the EaalthCepartnent tics feea depositedin the t t::ose

fess 

### be apalledto

atlsticafees 

### In the last he 

### expendituresfron the Kill you kindlygive nie your to whetheror not these fees shouldbe transferred to the GoneralRmonua Fund to apply againsttho costsof theVital 5tatlstics Eivisior~?~~ 

### You state that our OpinionKo. O-1394 *deniesthe t'e*ltb Departnentthe use of thz lti tfic spaaialfund. vitcl statisticsfeea deposited

?er:knpa

a nore aaaurotasteten;ent of tLat certof our holdin& in OplnlonNo, O-l.394 would be that themnorakile Geo. X, Sheppard, pagr I?

vital statlstios fees collected are to be deaoslted in the Special.vitol statistice fund and applied to the payment of salarieo provided for in the appropriation to the Bureau of Vital Statistics. Insofar as these fees are l.nsuffiaiant to pay all the solaries of the bureau authorized by the appropriation bill, payment thereof ’ is to bs supplemented from the General Revenue Fund.

Weunderattid from your letter that no withdrawals whatevsr were made during the last f ’lsaal year from the Vital Statistiob Fund, but -t&t all eXpenditUr8S of the Vital Statistics Bureau wer6 paid out of the General Revenue Fund.

In order to rectify this situation, it is our opinion that you should ns you sueqst, transfer the manias depoeited in the Vital StatistiCa Fund to the General Revenue Fund to apply 

### agabst the 

### expenditures of the Bureau of Vital gtatistiae. That 

### such is the l~nttntion of the Legislature is to be fourd In the follo~~ii:g provision of Seotlon 2, Bouse Bill 613, Act3 1939, (which appears ae Rule 54a of Art1016 4477, 7eraon*S Civil Statutes) :

* all EUU~

fees shall be 

### keptby the State Treasuie; in a special and separate fund, to be known aa the VVitnl 

### Statistias%md*, ad the amounts so deposited in tkis fund may be used for def ’raying expenses inaurred in the enforoement and ogerotlon of this Act .* Yours very truly

Assistant
#### Philena C. COHEN, Petitioner, v. CENTURY VENTURES, INC., etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 43384.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 30, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 270 So.2d 773.

CARLTON, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, ' McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. Paul Vincent HEALEY, Relator, v. Murray GOODMAN, as Judge of the Criminal Court of Record in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 70-514.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 14, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Mandamus dismissed.
10.39SecondAmendmenttothePharmacyclicsIncESPP




Exhibit 10.39


AMENDMENT TO THE 
PHARMACYCLICS INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
In accordance with Subsection A of Article IX of the Pharmacyclics, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended effective May 9, 2013 to read as follows:
1.Subsection A of Article X of the Plan shall be amended by substituting a semicolon for a period at the conclusion thereof and by adding the following words after “2008 Annual Meeting”:


“on October 21, 2011, the Plan was amended by the Board to increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance over the term of the Plan by 500,000 shares and the increase was approved by the stockholders at the 2011 Annual Meeting; and on March 28, 2013, the Plan was amended by the Board to increase the maximum number of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance over the term of the Plan by 300,000 shares and the increase was approved by the stockholders at the 2013 Annual Meeting.”
PHARMACYCLICS, INC.




	
		
	 
	/s/ Manmeet S. Soni

	 
	By:  Manmeet S. Soni

	 
	Title:   EVP, Finance

	 
	Date: 1/21/14









2504461-1
Exhibit
10.105


 


AMENDMENT


TO


THEMAVEN,
INC. 2016 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


OPTION
AGREEMENT


(INCENTIVE
STOCK OPTION OR NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION)


 


This
AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), dated as of June 3, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), to
THEMAVEN, INC. 2016 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OPTION AGREEMENT, by and between TheMaven, Inc. (the “Company”) and
James Heckman (“Optionee” or “you”).


 


RECITALS:


 


The
Company and Optionee entered into an Option Agreement, dated as of September 14, 2018 (the “Option Agreement”),
issued under the TheMaven, Inc. 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which sets forth certain terms and
conditions related to the option grant made by the Company to you to purchase up to 2,250,000 shares of common stock of the Company.
Pursuant to Section 3.2(b) of the Plan the Board of Directors of Company hereby amends the Option Agreement to modify certain terms and
conditions of the Option Agreement solely as specified below.


 


Except
as expressly provided herein, all other terms and conditions of the Option Agreement shall be unaffected by this Amendment and shall
remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meanings given them in the Option Agreement.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	The
                                            Option shall be reclassified as a Non-statutory Stock Option.



 


		2.	Notwithstanding
                                            the terms of the Plan or the Option Agreement, the Option Agreement shall be exercisable
                                            for the remainder of its full term.



 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year set forth above.


 




	THEMAVEN,
    INC.	 	James
    Heckman
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	            	 	By:	    
	Name:		 	Name:	
	Title:
    		 	Title:
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00399-CV

__________________

STILL AMERICAN, LLC, Appellant

V.

BARON GLOBAL DISTRIBUTORS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 22-10-14637-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Still American, LLC, appellant, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this 

accelerated appeal as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Appellant filed the 

motion before the appellate court issued a decision in the appeal. We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 1, 2023

Opinion Delivered February 2, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver

Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York

Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated

offices: Budapest Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 039578/000001 - 3382741 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

March 20, 2012

By Electronic Submission

Docket Section

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Supplement to Application of People Express Airlines, Inc. for a Certificate of Public

Convenience and Necessity (Docket DOT-OST-2012-0042)

Dear Sir/Madam:

Enclosed for filing in the above-referenced docket is an additional Fitness Questionnaire to be

incorporated into Exhibit PEX-4 of the Application dated March 19, 2012.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Echmalian

Transportation Specialist

jonathan.echmalian@hoganlovells.com

D +1 202 637 5439

Enclosure

cc: Katy O'Toole

Service List
​

Exhibit 10.1
AMENDMENT
TO THE
NEXTCURE, INC.
2015 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the NextCure, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended on November 5, 2018 (the “Plan”), is adopted by NextCure, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to be effective as set forth below.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Section 5.3 of the Plan allows the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolutions of the Board, dated September 30, 2021, the Board has approved an amendment to the Plan, as set forth herein and delegated authority to the undersigned officer to execute such amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective September 30, 2021, by replacing the last sentence of Section 10 with the following sentence:
 “In addition, to the extent the Award Agreement so provides or as otherwise provided by the Company (or, in the case of a Grantee subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, the Committee), payment of the Option Price for shares purchased pursuant to exercise of an Option or the Purchase Price for Restricted Stock or Stock Units may be made in any other form that is consistent with applicable laws, regulations and rules, including, without limitation, by cashless exercise procedure or by tender or attestation to the Company of shares of Stock, which shall be valued, for purposes of determining the extent to which such Option Price or Purchase Price has been paid thereby, at their Fair Market Value on the date of such tender or attestation.”
​

1



​

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer, this 30th day of September 2021.
NextCure, Inc.
​
	​


	​



	By:
	​

	​
	​

	/s/ Steven P. Cobourn
	​

	Steven P. Cobourn
	​

	Chief Financial Officer
	​



​

2
EXHIBIT 32

 

 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

 

|                 |   | Simmons Bank,                     |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                 |   | Trustee for Hugoton Royalty Trust |
|                 |   |                              |
| Date: March 30, 2020 | By     | /s/ NANCY WILLIS                  |
|                 |   | Nancy Willis                      |
|                 |   | Vice President                    |
Exhibit 12   AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)    Three Months EndedNine Months EndedSeptember 30,September 30,(dollars in thousands)2009200820092008Earnings:
Loss before benefit for income taxes$(129,404)$(583,262)$(609,297)$(698,571)Interest expense283,988308,338822,678925,633Implicit interest in rents3,9356,05814,79619,904Total earnings$ 158,519$(268,866)$ 228,177$ 246,966Fixed charges:
Interest expense$ 283,988$ 308,338$ 822,678$ 925,633Implicit interest in rents3,9356,05814,79619,904Total fixed charges$ 287,923$ 314,396$ 837,474$ 945,537Ratio of earnings to fixed charges*0.55(0.86)0.270.26  * Earnings were insufficient to cover total fixed charges by $129.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $609.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Earnings were insufficient to cover total fixed charges by $583.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and $698.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.    81
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David Lee HENRY, Appellee.

No. 74-38.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 22, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     <blank>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3634
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                   494
<INVENTORY>                                    1058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,291
<PP&E>                                         8623
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 72,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,896
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                     51,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   72,200
<SALES>                                        99,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               99,711
<CGS>                                          83,833
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  98,986
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (257)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                931
<INCOME-TAX>                                   485
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            446
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   446
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended April 25, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, James B. Perry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:



Date: June 8, 2010

/s/ JAMES B. PERRY James B. Perry Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of Compañía de Telecomunicaciones de Chile S.A. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Diego Martínez-Caro, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2008



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Diego Martínez-Caro De La Concha-Castañeda
|Diego Martínez-Caro De La Concha-Castañeda    
|                                              
|Controller and Chief Accounting Officer       

---
#### TOWN OF MARKSVILLE, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Noah HUDSON, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 4010.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Oct. 27, 1972.

Ford & Nugent by Howard N. Nugent, Jr., Alexandria, and Garrett & Ryland by B. Dexter Ryland, Alexandria, for defendant and appellant.

Charles A. Riddle, Marksville, for plaintiff and appellee.

Before FRUGE, CULPEPPER and DOMENGEAUX, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

The defendant-appellant has neither appeared nor filed a brief prior to the time this case was called for argument on September 27, 1972. Under the Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal, Rule VII, Seection 5(b), 8 LSA-R.S., we consider the appeal abandoned and subject to dismissal, Hollier v. Smith, 250 So.2d 497 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1971).

For the reasons assigned, defendant’s appeal is dismissed at his cost.

Appeal dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-139-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

December 23, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 17, 1997, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National Fuel), 10 Lafayette Square, Buffalo, New York 
14203, filed in Docket No. CP98-139-000 a request pursuant to Sections 
157.205 and 157.211 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural 
Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205 and 157.211) for approval to construct and 
operate a new residential sales tap, under National Fuel's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP83-4-000, pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act (NGA), all as more fully set forth in the request 
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    National Fuel states that it proposes to construct and operate a 
residential sales tap for delivery of approximately 150 Mcf of natural 
gas annually to National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation 
(Distribution) at an estimated cost of $1,500, for which Distribution 
will reimburse National Fuel. National Fuel asserts that service 
through the proposed tap will be made pursuant to National Fuel's Rate 
Schedule EFT. It is indicated that the proposed tap will be located in 
Elk County, PA.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 45 days of the 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214), a motion to intervene and pursuant to Section 157.205 of the 
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activities shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34007 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Document

Exhibit 10.2




NetScout Systems, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


Non-employee directors are compensated $60,000 annually for their services and do not receive any additional compensation for any regular Board meeting attended. The lead non-employee director receives an additional annual retainer of $35,000. Non-employee directors will receive $15,000 annually for serving on the Audit Committee, $10,000 annually for serving on the Compensation Committee, $6,000 annually for serving on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and $6,000 annually for serving on the Finance Committee. In addition, directors who are chairpersons of a particular committee are also given additional annual compensation of $15,000 for the Audit Committee, $10,000 for the Compensation Committee, $6,000 for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and $6,000 for the Finance Committee. The cash component of their compensation is paid quarterly. Non-employee directors are also reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or of any committee and for attendance at approved director education programs.


Non-employee directors are each granted an annual equity-based award in the form of restricted stock units. Effective September 12, 2018, the amount of the annual equity-based award is 7,000 restricted stock units. These restricted stock units vest 100% on the one year anniversary of the grant date provided that during such year, such director attends at least 75%, collectively, of the meetings of the Board and any committee of the Board of which such director is a member. In the event that the foregoing attendance requirements are not met, then 100% of these restricted stock units will vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant. No other equity awards are given to our non-employee directors.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT WILLIAM SANDERS, Petitioner, v. BEMIS SMITH, Respondent. No. 2D21-11 September 15, 2021 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, Judge. Mark D. Tinker, Scott H. Jackman and Krysta L. Torok of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner. Timothy W. Weber and Jeremy D. Bailie of Weber, Crabb, & Wein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Respondent. PER CURIAM. Denied. MORRIS, C.J., and KELLY and SMITH, JJ., Concur.2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.