alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         24,676
<SECURITIES>                               37,985,527
<RECEIVABLES>                                 218,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           38,563,589
<PP&E>                                      1,198,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                846,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             38,959,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       7,151,595
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       53,097
<OTHER-SE>                                 31,754,702
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               38,959,394
<SALES>                                       433,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,248,424
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 973,618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,017,905
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             99,837
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               157,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,512
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           157,064
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  157,064
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.03



</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-435V

Filed: November 19, 2020

UNPUBLISHED

MIRANDA SELLERS,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

 Special Master Horner

Ruling for Entitlement; Table Injury; 

Influenza Vaccine (Flu); Shoulder 

Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Michael Patrick Milmoe, Law Offices of Leah V. Duran, Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Camille Michelle Collett, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On March 23, 2018, petitioner filed a petition under the National Childhood 

Vaccine Injury Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10-34 (2012), alleging that as a result of an

influenza (“flu”) vaccination that she received on October 3, 2016, she suffered a right

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”). (ECF No. 1.)

Respondent initially filed a Rule 4 Report on April 30, 2019, recommending 

against compensation based on his review of the record at that time. (ECF No. 18.) 

Following further development of the record in this case, on November 18, 2020, 

respondent filed an amended Rule 4(c) report in which he advised the Court that “he is 

now of the opinion that petitioner is entitled to compensation for a Table injury of SIRVA 

after flu vaccination.” (ECF No. 47, p. 2.) Specifically, respondent stated that “[t]here 

were no other causes identified for petitioner’s SIRVA,” and that the medical records 

indicate that “petitioner has suffered the sequela of her injury for more than six months.”

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 
2

(Id. at 7.) Consequently, respondent believes that “petitioner has satisfied all legal 

prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” (Id.)

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Daniel T. Horner

Daniel T. Horner

Special Master
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[ND-001-0003b; FRL-5933-9]


Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated 
Facilities and Pollutants; North Dakota; Control of Landfill Gas 
Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve the North Dakota plan for 
implementing the Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfill Emission 
Guidelines at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc, which was required pursuant 
to section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (Act). The State's plan, which 
was submitted to EPA on September 11, 1997, establishes performance 
standards for existing MSW landfills and provides for the 
implementation and enforcement of those standards.
    In the final rules section of this Federal Register, the EPA is 
approving the State's submittal in a direct final rule without prior 
proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial action and 
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval 
is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments are 
received in response to this proposed rule, no further activity is 
contemplated and the direct final rule will become effective. If EPA 
receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and 
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final 
rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting 
on this document should do so at this time.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
January 14, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Written comments on this action should be addressed to Vicki 
Stamper, 8P2-A, at the EPA Region VIII Office listed. Copies of the 
documents relevant to this proposed rule are available for public 
inspection during normal business hours at the following locations: Air 
Program, Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII, 999 18th Street, 
suite 500, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466; and the North Dakota Department 
of Health, Division of Environmental Engineering, 1200 Missouri Avenue, 
room 304, Box 5520, Bismarck, North Dakota 58506-5520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicki Stamper, EPA Region VIII, (303) 
312-6445.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the direct 
final action which is located in the rules section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: October 24, 1997.
William P. Yellowtail,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 97-32639 Filed 12-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED BY THE 10-QSB FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 FOR YELLOWAVE  CORPORATIION  AND IS QUALIFIED
BY ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,330,284
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,781,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,171,586
<PP&E>                                            67,208
<DEPRECIATION>                                    25,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,242,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            120,341
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         942,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,028,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,242,626
<SALES>                                          668,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 717,586
<CGS>                                            986,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    986,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (294,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (1,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (268,020)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.30)



</TABLE>
State of TexasAppellee/s 

# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** March 5, 2014 N o s . 04
- 14
- 00004
- CR , 04
- 14
- 00005
- CR, 04
- 14
- 00006
- CR & 04
- 14
- 00007
- CR Devon Alexander KANE , Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No s . A1319 , A1320, A1321 & A1322

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER The Court Reporter ’ s Notification of Late Record is hereby GRANTED. The reporter ’ s record is due March 31, 2014.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of March, 2014 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
#### Mabel EARP, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION and Best Sundries, Inc., Respondents.

No. 70-550.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 2, 1970.

Andrew J. Mirabole, Tampa, for petitioner.

James R. Parks, Miami, and Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, for respondents.

McNULTY, Judge.

Petitioner was fired from her employment and sought unemployment benefits pursuant to Ch. 443, F.S.A. Her claim for such benefits was denied by respondents for the stated reason that she was guilty of “misconduct” within the meaning of 443.06, F.S.A. She seeks review by certiorari.

Petitioner’s employer had procedural standards for the purchase of merchandise by employees. The record reflects that petitioner repeatedly made purchases without complying with these procedures. Admittedly, although these procedures were violated by other employees, others did not violate them as frequently as did petitioner. Notwithstanding, the record is devoid of any evidence otherwise which would support a finding of a willful intent to steal or an evil design. Furthermore, there is no support for a conclusion that petitioner was guilty of such a degree of negligence as to manifest a culpability constituting the equivalent of such a willful intent or evil design. At most, she was guilty of mere negligence or poor judgment which will not suffice to constitute “misconduct” warranting forfeiture of unemployment benefits within the purview of 443.06, F.S.A.1

Accordingly, certiorari is granted and the order of the Industrial Relations Commission of the Florida Department of Commerce, reviewed hereby, is quashed.

PIERCE, A. C. J., concurs.

MANN, J., dissents.

1

. *See,*Spaulding v. Florida Industrial Commission (Fla.App.1968), 154 So.2d 334.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 ofCrown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 14, 2007                                                                  /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut   Chairman of the Board, President & ChiefExecutive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> CEG
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,870,600
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    554,000
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                       1,465,400
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        82,100
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 390,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,362,900
<COMMON>                                       555,200
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      755,400
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            616,400
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,926,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,003,400
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  22,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      2,600
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,433,300
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,362,900
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,847,400
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            67,400
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,593,200
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,593,200
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        254,200
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,300
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 256,500
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        41,600
<NET-INCOME>                                   147,500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  147,500
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        13,900
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       35,100
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         431,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.65
        

</TABLE>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33796]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 97N-0380]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Importer's Entry Notice'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn P. Capezzuto, Office of 
Information Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 22, 
1997 (62 FR 49519), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 
section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 
OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0046. The approval expires on November 30, 2000.

    Dated: December 18, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-33796 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
```
Exhibit 31.2  

 

 

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange 

Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

I, Louis J. Arcudi, III, certify that: 

 

|   |                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and |

 

 

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.     | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

 

 

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

 

|   |                     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/ Louis J. Arcudi, III |
|   | Louis J. Arcudi, III     |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  |

     

Dated: March 16, 2017

     

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,512
<PP&E>                                           3,495
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,530
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,533
<BONDS>                                          1,963
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        155
<COMMON>                                            98
<OTHER-SE>                                         683
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,522
<SALES>                                          2,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,195
<CGS>                                            1,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    239
<INCOME-TAX>                                        83
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       144
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49


</TABLE>
#### Harold SNOW and Peggy Snow, his wife, Appellants, v. Alphonso Alonzo ANTHONY et al., Appellees.

No. 72-898.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 13, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.