Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 1997 / Notices 6803

Enforcement Administration, United

States Department of Justice,

Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA

Federal Register Representative (CCR),

and must be filed no later than April 14,

1997.

Dated: January 27, 1997.

Gene R. Haislip,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–3659 Filed 2–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

Manufacturer of Controlled

Substances, Notice of Application

Pursuant to Section 1301.43(a) of Title

21 of the Code of Federal Regulations

(CFR), this is notice that on December

24, 1996, MD Pharmaceutical, Inc., 3501

West Garry Avenue, Santa Ana,

California 92704, made application by

renewal to the Drug Enforcement

Administration (DEA) for registration as

a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes

of controlled substances listed below:

Drug Schedule

Methylphenidate (1724) ................ II

Diphenoxylate (9170) ................... II

The firm plans to manufacture the

listed controlled substances to make

finished dosage forms for distribution to

its customers.

Any other such applicant and any

person who is presently registered with

DEA to manufacture such substances

may file comments or objections to the

issuance of the above application.

Any such comments or objections

may be addressed, in quintuplicate, to

the Deputy Assistant Administrator,

Office of Diversion Control, Drug

Enforcement Administration, United

States Department of Justice,

Washington, DC 20537, Attention: DEA

Federal Register Representative (CCR),

and must be filed no later than April 14,

1997.

Dated: January 27, 1997.

Gene R. Haislip,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration.

[FR Doc. 97–3642 Filed 2–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–09–M

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training

Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility To Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of January, 1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number of

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or sub-division have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–32,901; American Commercial

Vehicles, Stamping & Assembling

Div., Orrville, OH

TA–W–32,903; NOW Products, Inc.,

Chicago, IL

TA–W–32,817; Ingersoll-Dresser Pump

Co., Phillipsburg, NJ

TA–W–32,829; DuPont Films, Holly Run

Plant, Newport, DE

TA–W–32,935; Borg Warner Automotive,

Muncie, IN

TA–W–33,022; Quality Apparel

Manufacturing, Inc., New Bedford,

MA

TA–W–32,979; Collegeville Flag and

Manufacturing Co., Port Clinton, PA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–33,038; United Healthcare Corp.

(Formerly Metra Health Corp),

Milwaukee, WI

TA–W–32,978; CSCS Caribbean N.V.,

Miami, FL

TA–W–32,959; Bowdon Manufacturing

Co., Bowdon, GA

TA–W–33,101; Donnkenny Apparel,

Inc., Mantachie Warehouse/

Mustang Warehouse, Mantachie,

MS

TA–W–32,790 & A; Walker Information,

Inc., Indianapolis, IN and Tempe,

AZ

TA–W–33,082; World Airways, Herdon,

VA

TA–W–33,023; Associated Food Stores,

Inc., Pocatello, ID

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–32,841; Kensington Window,

Inc., Vandergrift, PA

The investigation revealed that

criteria (1) and criteria (2) have not been

met. A significant number or proportion

of the workers did not become totally or

partially separated as required for

certification. Sales or production did

not decline during the relevant period

as required for certification.

TA–W–32, 866; W.W.I., Inc., Dover

Products Div., Dover, TN

TA–W–32, 967; Hasbro, Inc/Pant Ease,

Arcade, NY

TA–W–32, 951; AMP, Inc., Erie, PA

TA–W–33, 061; Ball-Foster Glass

Container Co., Laurens, SC

TA–W–32, 969; NEC Technologies, Inc

(NECTECH), Northboro, MA

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–32, 822; Anchor Advance

Product, Inc., Morristown, TN

The investigation revealed that

production of toothbrushes was

transferred to a plant in Puerto Rico.

Puerto Rico is a commonwealth of U.S.

and therefore, it is considered domestic

U.S. production for purposes of the

Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–32, 963; Sunbeam (Outdoor

products), Portland, TN

TA–W–32, 879; Agway, Inc., Country

Product Group, Waverly, NY

Layoffs are related to a company

decision to transfer production

performed at the subject firm to other

domestic locations.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.
6804 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 1997 / Notices

TA–W–33, 081; Rohm and Haas, Inc.,

Bristol, PA: December 31, 1995.

TA–W–33, 005; Dystar L.P., Coventry,

RI: November 19, 1995.

TA–W–33, 003; Maidenform, Inc.,

Bayonne, NJ; November 24, 1995.

TA–W–32, 957; Apex Sportswear, New

York, NY: November 18, 1995.

TA–W–32, 877; Hamilton Beach-Proctor

Silex, Inc., Southern Pines, NC:

October 16, 1995.

TA–W–32, 987; The Vineyard, Inc.,

Clovis, NM: November 14, 1995.

TA–W–32, 936; Norman Manufacturing

Co., Philadelphia, PA: October 15,

1995.

TA–W–32, 984; Crossville Apparel

Manufacturing Co., Crossville, TN:

November 14, 1995.

TA–W–32, 851; Craddock-Terry, Inc.,

Halifax Plant, Halifax, VA: October

16, 1995.

TA–W–32, 940; Genesco, Inc., Laredo

and Code West Divisions,

Hohenwald, TN: November 7, 1995.

TA–W–32, 815; Opto Technology, Inc.,

Platteville, WI: September 20, 1995.

TA–32, 854; Advanced Metallurgy, Inc.,

McKeesports, PA: October 11, 1995.

TA–W–32, 988 & A; Dazey Corp., Osage

City, KS and New Century, KS:

November 18, 1995.

TA–W–32, 966; D.S. Knitting, White

Plains, PA: November 25, 1995.

TA–W–32, 971 & TA–W32, 972; The

Boyt Co., Iowa Falls, IA & Bedford,

IA: November 12, 1995.

TA–W–32, 947; Sunbeam Household

Products, Coushatta, LA: October

14, 1995.

TA–W–32, 946; Flintab SK Machine, Inc.

Div of Flintab, Inc., North

Falmouth, MA: November 6, 1995.

TA–W–33, 040; CWS Fashions, Inc.,

Lenoir, NC: December 5, 1995.

TA–W–33, 030; General Textiles,

Murphy, NC: November 25, 1995.

TA–W–32,827; Vought Aircraft Co.,

Commercial Aircraft Div, A

Subsidiary of Northrop Grumman

Corp., Dallas, TX: November 16,

1996.

TA–W–32,941; Kimble Glass, Inc.,

Vineland, NJ.

All workers engaged in the

production coffee carafes who became

totally or partially separated from

employment on or after October 8, 1995.

All workers engaged in the production

of hurricane shades and latern globes

are denied.

TA–W–32,976; Custom Stitchers II,

Lewiston, ME: October 30, 1995.

TA–W–32,965; Hawk Golf Bag Co.,

Clarion, IA: November 13, 1995.

TA–W–32,856; TRI County Assembly,

Williamsburg, KY: October 5, 1995.

TA–W–32,797; Joslyn Power Products

Div., Alsip, IL: September 20, 1995.

TA–W–32,799; Camden Wire Co., Inc.,

Camden, NY: September 25, 1995.

TA–W–32,925; Ferraz Corp.,

Parsippany, NJ: October 30, 1995.

TA–W–32,961; Killark Electric

Manufacturing Co., St. Louis, MO:

November 14, 1995.

TA–W–32,942; Peach state Limited,

Chester, GA: November 5, 1995.

TA–W–32,991; Channel Lumber Co.,

Graigmont, ID: January 24, 1997.

TA–W–32,973; Wex-Tex Industries, Inc.,

Dothan, AL: November 15, 1995.

TA–W–32,850; Craddock-Terry, Inc.,

Farmville Plant, Farmville, VA:

October 16, 1995.

Also, pursuant to Title V of the North

American Free Trade Agreement

Implementation Act (P.L. 103–182)

concerning transitional adjustment

assistance hereinafter called (NAFTA–

TAA) and in accordance with Section

250(a) Subchapter D, Chapter 2, Title II,

of the Trade Act as amended, the

Department of Labor presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for NAFTA–TAA

issued during the month of January,

1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

NAFTA–TAA the following group

eligibility requirements of Section 250

of the Trade Act must be met:

(1) That a significant number or proportion

of the workers in the workers’ firm, or an

appropriate subdivision thereof, (including

workers in any agricultural firm or

appropriate subdivision thereof) have

become totally or partially separated from

employment and either—

(2) That sales or production, or both, of

such firm or subdivision have decreased

absolutely,

(3) That imports from Mexico or Canada of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by such firm or subdivision

have increased, and that the increases in

imports contributed importantly to such

workers’ separations or threat of separation

and to the decline in sales or production of

such firm or subdivision; or

(4) That there has been a shift in

production by such workers’ firm or

subdivision to Mexico or Canada of articles

like or directly competitive with articles

which are produced by the firm or

subdivision.

Negative Determinations NAFTA–TAA

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criteria (3)

and (4) were not met. Imports from

Canada or Mexico did not contribute

importantly to workers’ separations.

There was no shift in production from

the subject firm to Canada or Mexico

during the relevant period.

NAFTA–TAA–01359; Quality Apparel

Manufacturing, Inc., New Bedford,

MA

NAFTA–TAA–01408; ACU-Crimp, Inc.,

North Manufacturing Div., Mesick,

MI

NAFTA–TAA–01341; Willamette

Industries, Inc., Dallas, OR

NAFTA–TAA–01322 & A; Barclay Home

Products, Cherokee, NC and

Robbinsville, NC

NAFTA–TAA–01360; Wex Tex

Industries, Inc., Dothan, AL

NAFTA–TAA–01405; McDonnell

Douglas, Long Beach, CA

NAFTA–TAA–01329; Eaton Corp.,

Automotive Controls Div.,

Wauwatosa, WI

NAFTA–TAA–01336; Praxair, Inc.,

Tonawanda, NY

NAFTA–TAA–01416; American Home

Products Corp., Wyeth-Ayerst

Laboratories, Mason, MI

NAFTA–TAA–01378; All American

Apparel, Inc., Salem, MO

NAFTA–TAA–01281; Mount Source,

Inc., Newport Beach, CA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

NAFTA–TAA–01385; Butler Sales

Agency, Inc., Eau Claire, WI

NAFTA–TAA–01352; Lucent

Technologies, Consumer Products

Div., Atlanta, GA

NAFTA–TAA–01374; United Healthcare

Corp (Formerly Metra Health Corp),

Milwaukee, WI

NAFTA–TAA–01331; Pennsylvania

Food Merchants Association,

Pennsylvania Coupon Redemption

Services Div., and Merchants

Express Money Order Co Div.,

Wormleysburg, PA

The investigation revealed that the

workers of the subject firm did not

produce an article within the meaning

of Section 250(a) of the Trade Act, as

amended.

Affirmative Determinations NAFTA–

TAA

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name and location for each

determination references the impact

date for all workers for such

determination.

NAFTA–TAA–01358; The Vineyard,

Inc., Colvis, NM: November 14,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01298; Will Knit, Inc.,

Clayton, NC: October 22, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01383; Ciba-Geigy Corp.,

Textile Products Div., Toms River,

NJ: October 16, 1995.
Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 30 / Thursday, February 13, 1997 / Notices 6805

NAFTA–TAA–01380; CWS Fashions,

Inc., Lenoir, NC: December 11,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01261; Joslyn Power

Products Corp., Alsip, IL:

September 30, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01388; Premium

Manufacturing, Inc., Gilbert, AZ:

December 16, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01364; Channel Lumber

Co., Craigmont, ID: November 21,

1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01351, A & B; Masterwear

Corp., Lexington Apparel,

Lexington, TN, Ripley, TN and

Somerville, TN: November 20, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01379; Hamilton Beach/

Proctor Silex, Inc., Washington, NC:

November 27, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01369; Tuff-N-Nuff

Products, Good Hope, GA:

December 3, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01395; Modine

Manufacturing Co., Modine Heat

Transfer, Inc., Camdenton, MO:

December 16, 1995.

NAFTA–TAA–01327; Connor Rubber

Technologies, Connor Corp., Fort

Wayne, IN: October 31, 1995.

I hereby certify that the

aforementioned determinations were

issued during the month of January,

1997. Copies of these determinations are

available for inspection in Room C–

4318, U.S. Department of Labor, 200

Constitution Avenue, N.W.,

Washington, D.C. 20210 during normal

business hours or will be mailed to

persons who write to the above address.

Dated: January 30, 1997.

Russell T. Kile,

Program Manager, Policy and Reemployment

Services, Office of Trade Adjustment

Assistance.

[FR Doc. 97–3601 Filed 2–12–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510–30–M

Notice of Determinations Regarding

Eligibility to Apply for Worker

Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA

Transitional Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the

Trade Act of 1974, as amended, the

Department of Labor herein presents

summaries of determinations regarding

eligibility to apply for trade adjustment

assistance for workers (TA–W) issued

during the period of January, February,

1997.

In order for an affirmative

determination to be made and a

certification of eligibility to apply for

worker adjustment assistance to be

issued, each of the group eligibility

requirements of Section 222 of the Act

must be met.

(1) That a significant number of

proportion of the workers in the

workers’ firm, or an appropriate

subdivision thereof, have become totally

or partially separated,

(2) That sales or production, or both,

of the firm or sub-division have

decreased absolutely, and

(3) That increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have

contributed importantly to the

separations, or threat thereof, and to the

absolute decline in sales or production.

Negative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

In each of the following cases the

investigation revealed that criterion (3)

has not been met. A survey of customers

indicated that increased imports did not

contribute importantly to worker

separations at the firm.

TA–W–33, 924; Cooper Firearms, Inc.,

Stevensville, MT

TA–W–33, 032; All American Apparel,

Inc., Salem, MO

TA–W–33, 024; Eagle Nest, Inc.,

Johnstown, PA

TA–W–33, 092; Spalding Knitting Mills,

Griffin, GA

TA–W–32, 974; Sprague, North Adams,

Inc., North Adams, MA

In the following cases, the

investigation revealed that the criteria

for eligibility have not been met for the

reasons specified.

TA–W–33, 044; Butler Sales Agency,

Inc., Eau Claire, WI

TA–W–32, 858; Volkswagen of America,

Distribution & Auto Service Center,

Port of Washington, DE

The workers firm does not produce an

article as required for certification under

Section 222 of the Trade Act of 1974.

TA–W–33, 133; Watauga Industries,

Elizabethton, TN

The investigation revealed that

criteria (1) and criteria (3) have not been

met. A significant number or proportion

of the workers did not become totally or

partially separated as required for

certification. Increases of imports of

articles like or directly competitive with

articles produced by the firm or

appropriate subdivision have not

contributed importantly to the

separations or threat thereof, and the

absolute decline in sales or production.

TA–W–32, 883; American Banknote Co.,

Bedford Park, IL

TA–W–32, 847; U.S. Natural Resources,

Irvington Moore Div., Portland, OR

TA–W–32, 893; Armour Swift—Eckrich

Kalamazoo Plant, Kalamazoo, MI

TA–W–32, 907; Bartell Machinery

System Corp., Rome, NY

TA–W–33, 007; Barth & Dreyfus of

California, Albemarle, NC

Increased imports did not contribute

importantly to worker separations at the

firm.

TA–W–32,905; W.C. Curdy Co., Oxford,

MI

The subject firm transferred a majority

of its production from Oxford, MI to

another company with manufacturing at

domestic locations in the relevant

period.

TA–W–32,910; Conoco, Inc.,

Downstream Operations,

Headquartered in Houston, TX &

Operating at Locations in Various

States: A; GA, B; KS, C; LA, D; OK,

E; MN, F; MS, G; MT, H; NC, I; NE,

J; NM, K; SC, L; TN, M; TX, N; VA,

O; WY

U.S. imports of refined petroleum

products and motor gasoline were very

low relative to domestic production in

Oct-Sept 1995–1996 time period.

Affirmative Determinations for Worker

Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been

issued; the date following the company

name & location for each determination

references the impact date for all

workers for such determination.

TA–W–32,930; M. Fine & Sons Mfg Co.,

Inc., New Albany, IN: November 12,

1995.

TA–W–32,986; Bell Oil Tools, Great

Bend, KS: November 8, 1995.

TA–W–32,001; Professional

Manufacturing, Inc., Paris, ID:

November 22, 1995.

TA–W–32,980; TRW Vehicle Safety

Systems, Inc., Louisville, MS:

November 13, 1995.

TA–W–33,018; California Fashions

Industries, Inc., Los Angles, CA:

November 26, 1995.

TA–W–32,996; Fruit of the Loom,

Raymondville Apparel,

Raymondville, TX: November 22,

1995.

TA–W–32,898; J.H. Collectibles, Inc.,

Nevada, MO: October 21, 1995.

TA–W–32,884; Staflex/Harotex Taylors,

SC: October 21, 1995.

TA–W–32,872; Tri-Con Industries Ltd.,

Livingston, TN: October 8, 1995.

TA–W–32,859; Western Supplies Co., St.

Louis, MO: October 9, 1995.

TA–W–32,865; Warnaco, Inc., Olga Div.,

Van Nuys, CA: October 9, 1995.

TA–W–33,027; Hanna Instruments, Inc.,

Woonsocket, RI: November 27,

1995.

TA–W–33,046; Kalina Sportwear, Inc.,

Hammonton, NJ: December 9, 1995.

TA–W–33,064; Kranco Browning, Inc.,

Orley Meyer Div (Formerly a Div. of

the Nanitowoc Co., Inc., Big Bend,

WI: December 12, 1995.