alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


                  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Datascope Corp. (the "Company") for the Quarter ended September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


November 9, 2005

                                        /s/ Lawrence Saper
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Lawrence Saper
                                       Chairman of the Board
                                       and Chief Executive Officer




                                        /s/ Murray Pitkowsky
                                       --------------------------------------
                                       Murray Pitkowsky
                                       Senior Vice President,
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer




                                       23
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A.S.T. AND 

R.F.T., MINOR CHILDREN, 

 Appellant. 

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00028-CV

Appeal from the

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2019DCM7816)

O R D E R

In order to protect the identity of the minor children who is the subject of this appeal, the 

Court has determined on its own motion that it is necessary to identify the children by their initials, 

A.S.T. and R.F.T., and the parent by initials as well, in all papers submitted to the Court, including 

letters, motions, and briefs. See Tex.R.App.P. 9..8. The Court will also refer to the children and 

parent by their initials in correspondence, orders, and in its opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.

Alley, J., not participating
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33805]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 2670]


Delegation of Authority

    By virtue of the authority vested in me by the laws of the United 
States, including the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the Arms Export 
Control Act, and the State Department Basic Authorities Act of 1956, 
and the memorandum delegation signed by the President on November 4, I 
hereby delegate to John Holum, during any period in which he serves 
both in the Office of the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and 
International Security Affairs and as Director of the Arms Control and 
Disarmament Agency, all authorities vested in the Secretary of State 
(including all authorities delegated by the President to the Secretary 
of State by any act, order, determination, delegation of authority, 
regulation or executive order heretofore or hereinafter enacted or 
issued) that have been or may be delegated or redelegated to the Under 
Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs.
    This memorandum shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 15, 1997.
Madeleine Albright,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 97-33805 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-M
No. 00-7570.

#### Parker *v.*Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
#### Leo S. GANTER, III, Petitioner, v. Marion H. GANTER, Respondent.

No. 40662.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 15, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 241 So.2d 719.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO                                                          SECTION 302 OF THE
                                                     SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Stephen Feldschuh, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of Daxor Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances
 under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The registrants  other
 certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for establishing and maintaining
 disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a)
Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused  such     disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to     ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its     consolidated subsidiaries,  is made  known
to us by  others within  those     entities, particularly  during the  period in which
this report is being     prepared;  b)
Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and     procedures  and
 presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the     effectiveness of the
disclosure  controls and procedures, as of the end of     the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c)
Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control     over financial
 reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent     fiscal quarter that has
 materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to     materially affect,  the
 registrants   internal  control  over  financial     reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying
officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal  control
over  financial  reporting,  to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a)
All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or          operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably          likely to
adversely  affect the  registrants  ability to record,  process,          summarize and
report financial information; and  b)
Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other          employees who
have a significant role in the registrants  internal control          over financial
reporting.  Date: November 9, 2004
        /s/ Stephen Feldschuh

Stephen Feldschuh
Vice President of Operations and
Chief Financial Officer  7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM LYNTON GROUP, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>               OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                 JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           671,191      
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                  1,997,052 
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                      896,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               3,778,023
<PP&E>                        17,850,339  
<DEPRECIATION>                 4,524,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                25,054,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          6,295,537
<BONDS>                       13,736,329
<COMMON>                       1,918,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                     2,297,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  25,054,680  
<SALES>                       18,511,661
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              18,511,661 
<CGS>                         13,997,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 16,856,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  58,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               823,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  773,518
<INCOME-TAX>                      44,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              729,518 
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                     729,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.11   
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.11 
        

</TABLE>
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Reports Tagged with Made in USA Made in the USA: An FTC Workshop (Jun 2020
 )
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-48983 onForm S-3 of our report on the financial statements dated February 27, 2006, (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph for the change in accounting method in 2004 for long-duration contractsto conform to Statement of Position 03-1 “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for CertainNon-Traditional Long Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts”) relating to the financial statements andfinancial statement schedules of ML Life Insurance Company of New York for the year ended December 31, 2005.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
Make Model Year Fuel Type Office Assigned

Lincoln Navigator 2016 Gasoline Internal Revenue Service 2011

Lincoln Navigator 2016 Gasoline Internal Revenue Service 2011

Ford Fusion 2011 Gasoline Departmental Offices 2019

Ford Fusion 2011 Gasoline Departmental Offices 2019

Ford Fusion 2011 Gasoline Departmental Offices 2019

Dodge Carvan 2011 Gasoline Departmental Offices 2019

Chevrolet Volt 2012 Electric Bureau of Engraving and Printing 2009

Dodge Grand Caravan 2011 E-85 Flex-Fuel Bureau of Engraving and Printing 2009

Buick Lucern 2008 Gasoline Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration 2038

Chevrolet Impala 2016 E-85 Flex-Fuel Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration 2038

Chevrolet Impala 2016 E-85 Flex-Fuel Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration 2038

Chevrolet Impala 2011 E-85 Flex-Fuel Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration 2038

Ford Escape 2011 Gas/Hybrid Office of The Comptroller of The Currency 2003
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4

SHARE PURCHASE WARRANT OF MR. EDWARD LAUGHLIN FLANAGAN

This document is identical to Exhibit 10.3
Share Purchase Warrants of Mr. William Albert Maligie, in its entirety with the exception of the following
terms:

Warrant No. ELF-12/98-001

Date if initial issuance: February 1, 1998

THIS CERTIFIES THAT, for value received, Edward Laughlin Flanagan  (hereinafter
called the Holder) of 4478 Garden Brook Drive, Chico, CA 95973is entitled to
purchase from the Company during the Term of this Warrant at the times provided
for herein, the number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share,
of the Company (the Common Stock) as specified herein, at the Warrant Price,
payable in the manner specified herein. The exercise of this Warrant shall be
subject to the provisions, limitations and restrictions herein
contained.

SECTION 2. Exercise of Warrant.

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2.1 |  | Right to Exercise. After the date hereof, the Holder may
exercise this Warrant, in parts
indicated herein or portion thereof to
purchase up to 250,000 shares of Common
Stock subject to adjustment as provided
in Section 5. The Warrant Price shall
be US$0.75 per share subject to
adjustment as provided in Section 5.

Added Section 2.2

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2.2 |  | Vesting Period. The vesting period shall be varying for
each one third of the total Share
Purchase Warrants and the number of
shares available for exercise at any time
during the term of this warrant on or
after the date indicated shall be as
follows:

| |             |  |  |                      |  |  |                                           |  |                                                   
| | ----------- |  |  | -------------------- |  |  | ----------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------
| | i)
ii)
iii) |  |  | 33.33%
33.33%
33.33% |  |  | 83,334 shares
83,333 shares
83,333 shares |  | February 1,
1999
February 1, 2000
February 1, 2001

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                             31,215
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     357,807
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,936,852
<PP&E>                                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,936,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,754,997
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                       450,000
<COMMON>                          131,034
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    5,936,852
<SALES>                           146,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  146,485
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,277,197
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>               (1,207,831)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                103,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (1,207,831)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (1,207,831)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                   (1,207,831)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.11)




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40229

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MANUEL TORRES-RODRIGUEZ, also known as Juan Manuel 

Rodriguez, also known as Juan Torres-Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-792-1

Before KING, JOLLY, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Manuel Torres-Rodriguez appeals the 46-month sentence of 

imprisonment imposed following his plea of guilty to illegal reentry into the 

United States following deportation. He contends the district court erred by 

applying a 12-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 based on his 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40229 Document: 00513111255 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/10/2015
No. 14-40229

2

prior conviction of knowing or intentional delivery of marijuana. See TEX.

HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.120(b)(3).

According to Torres-Rodriguez, the § 2L1.2 enhancement is inapplicable 

to his prior conviction because the Texas statute could be violated by the 

administration of marijuana, an act outside of the generic definition of a drug 

trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. We review de novo this preserved objection. 

United States v. Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d 453, 457 (5th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 

135 S. Ct. 1892 (2015). However, Torres-Rodriguez cites no Texas cases, nor 

any facts in his own situation, showing that Texas courts have applied

§ 481.120 to administering. Under Teran-Salas, 767 F.3d at 460, such a 

showing of a theoretical possibility, as opposed to a realistic probability, is 

insufficient to show error.

Torres-Rodriguez additionally contends that the § 2L1.2 enhancement is 

inapplicable because the Texas statute may encompass giving away a 

controlled substance for no remuneration, also conduct outside of the generic 

definition of a drug trafficking offense. This court recently rejected the 

argument that an offense must require remuneration to qualify as a drug 

trafficking offense under § 2L1.2. United States v. Martinez-Lugo, 782 F.3d 

198, 201-05 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, Torres-Rodriguez’s argument is 

foreclosed.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 14-40229 Document: 00513111255 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/10/2015
#### Olga Maricela JEREZRUIZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-71241.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 13, 2002.

Before KOZINSKI and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and MAHAN,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM***

Olga Maricela Jerez-Ruiz, a citizen of Guatemala, petitions for a review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of her claim for asylum and for withholding of deportation. We deny the petition.

The BIA’s determination that an alien is not eligible for asylum must be upheld if “ ‘supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.’ ” *INS v. Elias-Zaca-rias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 815, *234117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992) (citation omitted). “It can be reversed only if the evidence presented ... was such that a reasonable factfinder would have to conclude that the requisite fear of persecution existed.” *Id.*When an alien seeks to overturn the BIA’s adverse determination, “he must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *Id.*at 483-84, 112 S.Ct. at 817; *see also Ghaly v. INS,*58 F.3d 1425, 1429 (9th Cir.1995).

Where an asylum claim is involved, an alien must show either past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution that is “both subjectively genuine and objectively reasonable.” *Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 960 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc). And the claimed persecution must be on account of one of the grounds set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A). *See id.*at 962.

While Jerez did show persecution of close relatives, she did not show that it was on account of political opinion. *See Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. at 482-83, 112 S.Ct. at 816; *Ochave v. INS,*254 F.3d 859, 866 (9th Cir.2001); *Molino-Morales v. INS,*237 .F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2001). Nor did she show that it was directed at her on account of her social group, or otherwise. *See Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089,---, 8425-26 (9th Cir.2002).

Petition DENIED.1

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Because Jerez did not meet the eligibility requirements for asylum, she was not entitled to withholding of deportation either. *See Ghaly,*58 F.3d at 1429.