alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MORRISON ASSURANCE COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Petitioner, v. Sylvia L. POLAK, as Executrix and Surviving Spouse of Ralph L. Polak, Deceased, Respondent.

No. 68-565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Feb. 3, 1970.

William C. Merritt, Sherouse & Corlett, Miami, for petitioner.

Dean, Adams, George & Wood, and Don R. Livingston, Miami, for respondent.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on December 17, 1968 (216 So.2d 484) affirming the summary judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed December 17, 1969, 230 So.2d 6, and mandate dated January 19, 1970 quashed this court’s judgment of affirmance.

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on January 6, 1969 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed December 17, 1968, 216 So.2d 484, is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of this court and the summary judgment of the Circuit Court appealed from is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for proceedings in accordance with the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Circuit Court (Rule 3.16(b) F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 1, 2007 of CrownCrafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 15, 2007                                                                   /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson   Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3390]



[[Page 6617]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
[STB Finance Docket No. 33351]


SPCSL Corp.--Trackage Rights Exemption--Norfolk and Western 
Railway Company

    Norfolk and Western Railway Company (NW) has agreed to grant 
trackage rights to SPCSL Corp. (SPCSL) over approximately 19,950 feet, 
more or less, of NW trackage at Springfield, IL. The trackage rights 
will allow the City of Springfield to consolidate the NW and SPCSL 
rights of way into one corridor.
    The transaction was scheduled to be consummated on February 3, 
1997.
    As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by the 
trackage rights will be protected by the conditions imposed in Norfolk 
and Western Ry. Co.--Trackage Rights--BN, 354 I.C.C. 605 (1978), as 
modified in Mendocino Coast Ry., Inc.--Lease and Operate, 360 I.C.C. 
653 (1980).
    This notice is filed under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(7). If it contains 
false or misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. 
Petitions to revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed 
at any time. The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically 
stay the transaction.
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to STB 
Finance Docket No. 33351, must be filed with the Surface Transportation 
Board, Office of the Secretary, Case Control Branch, 1201 Constitution 
Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20423. In addition, a copy of each 
pleading must be served on Gary A. Laakso, Esq., SPCSL Corp., One 
Market Plaza, Room 846, San Francisco, CA 94105.

    Decided: February 5, 1997.

    By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3390 Filed 2-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-00-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Feldschuh,
M.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


                                           /s/ Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.
                                           --------------------------
                                           Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           November 21, 2005


                                      -13-
February 24, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood '••••,w x r •••-pr^nT.TioM 

Secretary -'•' ' ^^' ,.;;,.••-',V""'^ " 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. ! ,'\ '^ ^ \ • 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's application to provide 

new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in reaching a landmark 

Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York to Haneda in order to 

provide an essential connection between two of the world's financial centers 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance membership, have 

underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise committed to the 

greater New York community and has provided New York with unsurpassed air service since the 1930s. 

The New York Metropolitan area will gain a significant economic benefit from these proposed new flights, as will 

American's customers and employees. However, we need your help to make the JFK/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from Kennedy to 

Haneda! 

j/Su.(l(^* 

Kathleen O'Meara 

Independent Travel Consultant 

(' .'.OJ-JbS-162y Executive Travel Asscxiates 

I ;.'f,P 8JK-0103 1333 New Hampshire Ave, NW 

kuri'.eaMiajexecliavel.coin Suite 701 

Washington, DC 20036 

United States 

yistl !)'"• on the web at vnw;.exectravel.com 

t xfiuhve T;avel Associates is A Hogg Robinson Group (HRG) Company. 

Save a tree! Think about the environment! Don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,407,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,867,143
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (539,544)
<INVENTORY>                                    185,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,630,928
<PP&E>                                       5,520,971
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,042,968)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,945,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,479,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,759
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,422,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,945,879
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,220,877
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               52,541,064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,151,026)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (26,151,026)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (26,151,026)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($6.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($6.64)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-99764, 33-41474, 333-50298, 333-111513, 333-135832, 333-135831) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-  130111) of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal  control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  New York, NY  February 26, 2007
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7447
BERNARD BARNES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus R. ALLEN; T. BLOW; D. BRIGGS; N. E. WHITLOW, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-237-3) Submitted: March 12, 1998 Decided: March 24, 1998 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bernard Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and dismissing without prejudice this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). The order is not appealable because the defect on which the dismissal was based could be cured by amending the complaint. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, this court does not have jurisdiction over this appeal and it must be dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Charlie WYNN, Jr. v. Paralee Buchanan SMITH et al.

77-27.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 21, 1978.

Garolyn D. Gaines of Chestnut, Sanders & Sanders, Selma, for appellant.

W. W. Dinning of Lloyd, Dinning & Boggs, Demopolis, for appellees.

FAULKNER, Justice.

Wynn appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Marengo County denying his motion to set aside a default judgment for sale and division. We affirm.

On March 23, 1976, a Bill for Sale and Division was filed along with an affidavit for obtaining service on unknown defendants by publication. The clerk issued an order of publication of the following defendants: Heirs of Julia Simmons, deceased; Heirs of Mary Simmons, deceased; and Heirs of Carrie Simmons, deceased. Additional defendants were later added by amendment and personally served, but Wynn was served only by publication. On October 26 application for entry of default was made, and a guardian ad litem was appointed to represent the interests of the unknown defendants. After two hearings, a decree ordering sale and division was entered. The sale was advertised for four weeks, and the property was sold in two parcels on March 25, 1977. The sale was approved on April 11 and a final decree and order of distribution entered on June 3.

On July 25, Wynn filed a motion to vacate the judgment on the ground of fraud or mistake of the appellees. His contentions are two-fold: (1) that the affidavit for obtaining service on unknown defendants is inadequate because of failure to allege a diligent inquiry, and (2) that appellees were not diligent in ascertaining the names of additional heirs because they could have learned Wynn’s name and address from an heir who resided on the property.

*974At the hearing on the ARCP 60(b) motion, the original affidavit for publication was missing from the file. Wynn contends that the original affidavit contained no allegation of diligent inquiry. However, the record on appeal contains a document purporting to be a facsimile of the original affidavit. This facsimile does include an allegation of diligent inquiry.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and BLOODWORTH, ALMON and EMBRY, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7823

GARY RAMON JOHNSON-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH SACCHET; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97-

3720-MJG)

Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary Ramon Johnson-Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Gary Ramon Johnson-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. Johnson-Bey v. Sacchet, No.

CA-97-3720-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 19, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>




EXHIBIT 11









                         ARTESIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      2004           2003           2002
                                                  ------------   ------------   ------------
<C>                                               <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings
  Income Applicable to Common Stock Shares,       $  4,400,193   $  3,845,323   $  4,125,431
  Class A Non-Voting and Class B Common Stock
  Weighted average number of shares outstanding
    Basic                                            3,936,066      3,880,159      3,533,460
    Diluted                                          4,065,651      3,992,519      3,612,588
Net Income per Common Share, Class A
  Non-Voting and Class B Common Stock
    Basic                                         $       1.12   $       0.99   $       1.17
    Diluted                                       $       1.08   $       0.96   $       1.14
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66865-66866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33334]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of Banks 
or Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.

[[Page 66866]]

 Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve 
Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of 
Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 6, 1998.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Jeffery Hirsch, Banking 
Supervisor) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Lee Allen Novak, Rebecca Sue Novak, and Nicholas Lee Novak, all 
of Urichsville, Ohio; to acquire voting shares of FNB, Inc., Dennison, 
Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire First National Bank of Dennison, 
Dennison, Ohio.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Lois Berthaume, Vice President) 
104 Marietta Street, N.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-2713:
    1. Joseph Rohlen Kondisko, and Allana Minerva Kondisko, both of 
Venice, Florida, and William Graham McKelvey, and Jeanne Wolford 
McKelvey, both of Salix, Pennsylvania; to collectively control 
outstanding voting shares of Community National Bank Corporation, 
Venice, Florida, and thereby indirectly acquire Community National Bank 
of Sarasota County, Venice, Florida.
    2. Rachel J. Reeves, Miami, Florida; to retain 31.63 percent, and 
acquire an additional 19.37 percent, for a total of 51 percent, of the 
voting shares of NGLC, Inc., Miami, Florida, and thereby indirectly 
acquire Peoples National Bank of Commerce, Miami, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 17, 
1997.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 97-33334 Filed 12-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-F
EXHIBIT 11.4

<TABLE>
CPI CORP. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC
(in thousands of dollars and shares except per share amounts)
Forty Weeks Ended Nov. 11, 2000 and Nov. 13, 1999
<CAPTION>
                                           Forty Weeks Ended
                                         -----------------------
                                          Nov. 11,    Nov. 13,
                                            2000        1999
                                         ---------    ---------
<S>                                      <C>          <C>
Basic:
  Net earnings (loss) applicable to
    common shares:
      From continuing operations         $  7,146     $ (2,279)
      From discontinued operations         (3,880)      (1,950)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings (loss)              $  3,266     $ (4,229)
                                         =========    =========
Shares:
  Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding              17,824       17,777
  Less:  Treasury stock - weighted
    average                                (9,885)      (7,897)
                                         ---------    ---------
  Weighted average number of common
    and common equivalent shares
    outstanding                             7,939        9,880
                                         =========    =========
Net earnings (loss) per common and
    common equivalent shares:
      From continuing operations         $   0.90     $  (0.23)
      From discontinued operations          (0.49)       (0.20)
                                         ---------    ---------
        Net earnings (loss)              $   0.41     $  (0.43)
                                         =========    =========


</TABLE>



                              34