alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2222100
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          416300
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        317300
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  329200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3284900
<COMMON>                                           400
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       739100
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             475200
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1214700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      22900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            886000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               60300
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                   96300
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      400
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1004300
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3284900
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       352900
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             41200
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      225600
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      266800
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          86100
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                4600
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   90700
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         21200
<NET-INCOME>                                     69500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        200
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    69300
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        116800
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        26700
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           73100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.68
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated February 14, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule and management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of K•Swiss Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of K•Swiss Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36505, effective August 23, 1990, File No. 33-77258, effective April 4, 1994, File No. 33-95650, effective August 10, 1995, File No. 333-79641,effective May 28, 1999, File No. 333-91864, effective July 7, 2002 and File No. 333-122955, effective February 23, 2005) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-37895, effective October 17, 1997 and File No. 333-60043,effective August 5, 1998). 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

February 14, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             125
<SECURITIES>                                    13,315
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,423
<PP&E>                                             707
<DEPRECIATION>                                     151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,907
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,629
<SALES>                                          9,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,551
<CGS>                                            5,339
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  86
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    594
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       349
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,053<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       976
<INVENTORY>                                     15,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,940
<PP&E>                                         107,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,910
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,750
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,569<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,717
<SALES>                                         45,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,143
<CGS>                                           34,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   34,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    38
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,169
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCES.
<F2>OTHER SE INCLUDES TREASURY STOCK.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### MONKEY COLOR, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. Lottie A. GROSS et al., Respondents.

No. 40631.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 15, 1971.

Certiorari denied.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from United 
Investors Income Properties II 1997 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000862028
<NAME> UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             834
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           4,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                     640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,437
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,437
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   499
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.68<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7432

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ZACHARY ADAM CHESSER , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O ’ Grady , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cr - 00395

- LO

- 1 ; 1:15

- cv - 01602

- LO )

Submitted : May 14, 2018 Decided: May 22, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Zachary Adam Chesser , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zachary Adam Chesser seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying his motion to appoint counsel and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not is sue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that th e district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prison er must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ch esser has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Chesser’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
<PAGE> 32

                                                                 Exhibit 12


           AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (Unaudited)



                                                         Six Months Ended
                                                             June 30,
                                                        2003          2002
                                                      (dollars in thousands)

Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $289,841      $244,139
  Interest expense                                     276,444       273,086
  Implicit interest in rents                             9,277         8,713

Total earnings                                        $575,562      $525,938


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $276,444      $273,086
  Implicit interest in rents                             9,277         8,713

Total fixed charges                                   $285,721      $281,799


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        2.01          1.87
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.
                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    % OF VOTING
                                                                                     SECURITIES
                                                                                    OWNED BY ITS
                                                                JURISDICTION OF      IMMEDIATE
                    NAME OF CORPORATION                          INCORPORATION         PARENT
                    -------------------                          -------------         ------
<S>                                                           <C>                   <C>
Transatlantic Reinsurance Company...........................  New York, U.S.A.          100%
    Putnam Reinsurance Company..............................  New York, U.S.A.          100%*
    Trans Re Zurich.........................................  Zurich, Switzerland       100%*
    Transatlantic Re (Argentina) S.A........................  Argentina                 100%*
    Transatlantic Re (Brasil) Ltda..........................  Brazil                    100%*
</TABLE>

--------------

* The common stock is owned 100% by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7094 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to expand the permissible 

use of funds under the Coronavirus Relief Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2020 

Mr. DAVIDSON of Ohio (for himself, Mr. BUDD, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. 

ROUZER, and Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to expand 

the permissible use of funds under the Coronavirus Relief 

Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flexibility for States 

5 and Localities Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7094 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF PERMISSIBLE USE OF FUNDS 

2 UNDER THE CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601(d) of the Social Secu4 rity Act, as added by section 5001(a) of the CARES Act 

5 (Public Law 116–136), is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(d) USE OF FUNDS.—A State, Tribal government, 

7 and unit of local government shall use the funds provided 

8 under a payment made under this section— 

9 ‘‘(1) to cover those costs of the State, Tribal 

10 government, or unit of local government (or of any 

11 other unit of local government with a population not 

12 greater than 500,000 within such State, Tribal gov13 ernment, or unit of local government) that— 

14 ‘‘(A) are necessary expenditures incurred 

15 due to the public health emergency with respect 

16 to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19); 

17 ‘‘(B) were not accounted for in the budget 

18 most recently approved as of the date of enact19 ment of this section for the State or govern20 ment; and 

21 ‘‘(C) were incurred during the period that 

22 begins on March 1, 2020, and ends on Decem23 ber 30, 2020; or 

24 ‘‘(2) to offset budgetary shortfalls of the State 

25 or government that occurred due to such public 

26 health emergency and that were not accounted for in 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7094 IH

1 such budget (except that such funds may not be 

2 used to make contributions to any underfunded pen3 sion plan in excess of the contributions accounted 

4 for in such budget).’’. 

5 (b) APPLICATION OF PROVISIONS.—Amounts appro6 priated for fiscal year 2020 under section 601(a)(1) of the 

7 Social Security Act (as modified by subsection (a)) shall 

8 be subject to the requirements contained in Public Law 

9 116–94 for funds for programs authorized under sections 

10 330 through 340 of the Public Health Service Act (42 

11 U.S.C. 254 through 256). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### In re THE FLORIDA BAR v. Eugene TANNENBAUM. STATE ex rel. GERSTEIN, State Attorney, Eleventh Judicial Circuit v. Donald J. EANETT.

Nos. 39955, 40314.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 21, 1970.

*303MEMORANDUM TO: The Clerk

FROM: DREW, J., Chairman, Rules Committee.

OPINION FILED: October 21, 1970

The Chief Justice and the other Justices have requested that I advise you concerning the application of the Integration Rule to the above two cases. These disciplinary proceedings are ones instituted in the circuit courts pursuant to Rule 11.14 of the Integration Rule, 32 F.S.A. Under the rule the district courts of appeal and the circuit courts have concurrent jurisdiction with The Florida Bar in disciplinary matters. The rule contains a provision that the forum first asserting jurisdiction in a disciplinary matter shall retain the same to the exclusion of the other until the final determination of the cause.

*304In No. 39,955 a final judgment was entered suspending Eugene Tannenbaum from the practice of law in Florida for a period of sixty days beginning June 1, 1970.

In No. 40,314 a judgment was entered disbarring the respondent Donald J. Eanett from the practice of law. These two final judgments concluded the matters in the circuit courts. The rule (11.14[4]) provides that, upon the rendition of such judgment in the circuit court, three certified copies should be filed in this Court. Upon the filing of such copies here, one is retained in our file (and I think we should docket that and create a case number as has been done), one shall be forwarded by the Clerk of this Court to the Executive Director of The Florida Bar and the other copy shall be forthwith served upon the accused attorney. The purpose of the provision for filing such copies here and with the Florida Bar is to be able to note such judgments upon our roster of admitted attorneys and to enable the Florida Bar to do the same. The judgment becomes effective when rendered in the circuit court and filed with the official clerk of that court.

In the event the disciplined attorney desires to have the matter reviewed here, he must take an appeal from such judgment in accordance with the disciplinary rule for appellate review. If no appeal is taken, no further action is required in the matter.

Now so far as these two cases are concerned, in the Tannenbaum case the suspension period expired, under the terms of the judgment, on September 1st. The suspended attorney has therefore been an active member of The Bar since said date without further action on his part being required. In the Eanett case, this attorney remains disbarred until such time as he shall apply for reinstatement to the Board of Governors. The circuit court under Rule 11.14(8) has no jurisdiction to order reinstatement because all reinstatement petitions, whether the proceeding originates in the circuit court or appellate court or Florida Bar, must be processed in accordance with present Integration Rule on reinstatement by filing a petition with the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar.

ERVIN, C. J. and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-30696

Summary Calendar

MARY ANN LOVELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GARY HURFORD, President; RAY L. HUNT, Chairman; HUNT OIL COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees,

___________________________________________________

MARY ANN LOVELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

MILLS TIMMONS & FLOWERS, Succession of Meaker White,

Second Judicial District Court in and for 

Claiborne Parish, Louisiana,

Defendant-Appellee,

___________________________________________________

MARY ANN LOVELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

JAMES HATCH, Attorney, Hatch & Smith,

Defendant-Appellee,

___________________________________________________

MARY ANN LOVELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS
1Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

2

JOHN MONTGOMERY, Attorney, Second Judicial District,

Defendant-Appellee,

___________________________________________________

MARY ANN LOVELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GARY HURFORD, President; RAY L. HUNT, Chairman,

Hunt Oil Company,

Defendants-Appellees,

___________________________________________________

MARY ANN LOVELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

WAYNE TIMMONS, Mills Timmons & Flowers,

Defendant-Appellee,

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-584-G)

 

December 26, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Mary Ann Lovell, proceeding pro se, brought the consolidated

actions, and numerous others, in the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Louisiana, registering numerous complaints
3

against various defendants having to do with mineral production

attributable to the interest of Meaker Glover White in minerals

underlying certain lands in Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. Following

consolidation of the captioned cases, the district court considered

defendants’s motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12 (b)(6) and

granted each motion dismissing plaintiff’s claims. We have carefully

reviewed the briefs on file and the record and are satisfied that the

reasons given by the district court in its Memorandum and Order filed

June 14, 1996 in the consolidated matters are correct. We therefore

affirm the district court’s dismissal of the captioned cases

essentially for the reasons given by it in its memorandum and order.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m., Monday, January 26, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Adjudicatory Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-33633 Filed 12-19-97; 2:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
#### BROWN v. HAYDEN STONE INCORPORATED.

No. 38409.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 218 So.2d 230.