alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67649-67650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33665]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service


1998 Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp (Federal Duck 
Stamp) Contest

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) announces the dates 
and locations of the 1998 Federal Duck Stamp Contest; the public is 
invited to attend.

DATES: 1. The 1998 contest opens for submission July 1, 1998.
    2. Persons wishing to enter this year's contest may submit entries 
anytime after Wednesday, July 1, but all must be postmarked no later 
than midnight Tuesday, September 15, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Requests for complete copies of the regulations, 
reproduction rights and the display and participating agreements should 
be addressed to: Federal Stamp Contest, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 
Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Suite 2058, 
Washington, D.C. 20240.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mrs. Lita F. Edwards, telephone: (202) 208-4354; or fax: (202) 208-
6296.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Location of Contest: Department of the 
Interior Building, Auditorium (``C'' Street entrance) 1849 C Street, 
N.W., Washington, D.C. The public may view the 1998 Federal Duck Stamp 
Contest

[[Page 67650]]

entries on Tuesday, November 3, 1998, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., in 
the Department of the Interior Auditorium. This year's judging will be 
held from November 4-5, 1998, beginning at 10:30 a.m. on Wednesday, 
November 4, and continuing at 9:00 a.m. on Thursday, November 5.
    The following five eligible species for the 1998 duck stamp contest 
are as follows:

(1) American Green-winged Teal
(2) Black Duck
(3) Greater Scaup
(4) Northern Pintail
(5) Ruddy Duck

    The primary author of this document is Mrs. Lita F. Edwards, U.S. 
Fish and Wildlife Service.

    Dated: December 17, 1997.
Jamie Rappaport Clark,
Director.
[FR Doc. 97-33665 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc.:

      We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 333-64191) on Form S-8 of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group, Inc. of our
report dated March 6, 2000, except as to Note 19 which is as of March 14, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Santa Barbara Restaurant Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows and
related financial statement schedule for the years then ended which report
appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Santa Barbara
Restaurant Group, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Orange County, California
March 29, 2000
#### Oscar FRANCIS and Mattie Francis, his wife, Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 73-213.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

A.D. 1973.

Dec. 18, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1974.

Michael A. Lipsky, Miami, for appellants.

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann & Jennings and Joseph W. Wom-ack, Sam Daniels, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the plaintiffs below from an adverse summary judgment. Plaintiff Oscar Francis alleged injuries, proximately caused by his use over an extended period of an automobile undercoating product supplied by the defendant; that the product was inherently dangerous; and that the danger to users was not labeled or shown on the products containers. His wife Mattie Francis joined, claiming loss of consortium. Compensatory and punitive damages were sought.

The defendant denied that the product was inherently dangerous to users; averred it had no duty to give a warning with respect thereto, or to instruct the plaintiff on the use thereof; and pleaded contributory negligence.

We are impelled to conclude it was error to enter summary judgment for the defendant. The pleadings and evidence before the court showed the existence of genuine issues of material fact, relating to negligence, contributory negligence and proximate cause, which properly could not be resolved on motion for summary judgment. See Tampa Drug Co. v. Wait, Fla. 1958, 103 So.2d 603; Williams v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Fla.App.1963, 149 So.2d 898; Edwards v. California Chemical Co., Fla.App. 1971, 245 So.2d 259.

We hold to be without merit the contention of the appellee that where the plaintiffs as well as the defendant moved for summary judgment the court thereby became entitled to decide the case by summary judgment notwithstanding the presence of triable issues as to material facts *147which were in dispute. Where genuine issues of material fact are shown to exist, the fact that both plaintiff and defendant filed motions for summary judgment claiming the non-existence of such issues, will not serve to dissipate them, nor will it entitle the court to decide such triable issues without trial. Shaffran v. Holness, Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 94, 98; West Shore Restaurant Corp. v. Turk, Fla.1958, 101 So.2d 123, 126. See 6 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2 Ed., § 56.13, wherein it is stated: ‘.‘The well-settled rule is that cross-motions for summary judgment do not warrant the court in granting summary judgment unless one of the moving parties is entitled to judgment as a matter of law upon facts that are not genuinely disputed.”

Accordingly, the summary judgment is reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Klamath Fishery Management Council; Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App. I), this notice announces a meeting of the Klamath 
Fishery Management Council, established under the authority of the 
Klamath River Basin Fishery Resources Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 460ss 
et seq.). The Klamath Fishery Management Council makes recommendations 
to agencies that regulate harvest of anadromous fish in the Klamath 
River Basin. The purpose of this meeting will be to develop a range of 
options for the 1997 fishery management season for discussion with the 
Salmon Advisory Subpanel of the Pacific Fishery Management Council. The 
meeting is open to the public.

DATES: The Klamath Fishery Management Council will meet from 1:00 p.m. 
to 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, March 2, 1997.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Red Lion Hotel, Lloyd Center, 
1000 N.E. Multnomah, Portland, OR.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Ronald A. Iverson, Project Leader, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1006 (1215 South Main), Yreka, 
California 96097-1006, telephone (916) 842-5763.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For background information on the Klamath 
Council, please refer to the notice of its initial meeting that 
appeared in the Federal Register on July 8, 1987 (52 FR 25639).

    Dated: February 6, 1997.
Thomas J. Dwyer,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 97-3584 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P
EXHIBIT32.1






ODYSSEYPICTURES CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual  Report of Odyssey Pictures Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Foster, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Odyssey Pictures Corporation and will be retained by Odyssey Pictures Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






July15, 2009






/s/ John W. Foster


JohnW. Foster


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
No. D-1997.

#### In re Disbarment of Kramer.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see 525 U. S. 926.]
JAMES M. CLARK

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2622

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed September 6 , 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Calhoun County

. Allen L. Register , Judge

.

Terry P. Roberts, Law Office of Terry P. Roberts, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and S amuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises two issues related to his conviction and one issue regarding

his sentencing . We find only the claim related to appellant’s sentencing has merit.

T he S tate concedes the trial court improperly designated appellant as a n habitual

felony offender, ignoring the j ury’ s express finding that the S tate had failed to2 prove appellant’s prior convictions. * See Borrell v. State 478 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th

DCA 1 985)

.

Based upon the State’s concession, we strike the habitual felony offender

designation and remand for appellant to be resentenced.

WOLF, B.L. THOMAS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.

* This finding was expressed in a special verdict form related to wheth er appellant

violated section 794.0115, Florida Statutes (2013).
#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. John FULFORD v. C. Paul PHELPS, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Corrections.

No. 60849.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: John Fulford applying for writs of certiorari and mandamus. Parish of East Baton Rouge.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 12



CONSOLIDATED NATURAL GAS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Thousands of Dollars)



_____________________________________________________________________________
Twelve Months to June 30                                               1997
_____________________________________________________________________________
Earnings:
  Net income................................................         $293,332
  Add income taxes..........................................          144,831
                                                                     ________
    Income before income taxes..............................          438,163
  Distributed income from unconsolidated investees,
    less equity in earnings thereof.........................             (246)

                                                                     ________
    Subtotal................................................          437,917
                                                                     ________

  Add fixed charges:
    Interest on long-term debt, including amortization
      of debt discount and expense less premium.............          104,856
    Other interest expense..................................            7,978
    Portion of rentals deemed to be representative
      of the interest factor................................            9,213
    Fixed charges associated with 50% projects with debt....            2,067
                                                                     ________
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES.........................................          124,114
                                                                     ________
TOTAL EARNINGS..............................................         $562,031
                                                                     ========

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES..........................             4.53
                                                                     ========
_____________________________________________________________________________
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald F. Adam,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(3)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(4)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




By:
              /s/ Donald F. AdamDonald
      F. AdamChief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      27, 2009
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2023*

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

NEW

MONEY

Net BILLS Issuance for the quarter 513.45

SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT** MONEY

COUPONS

CHANGE^

20-Year Bond (r) 10/2 13.00 1.00

2-Year Note 10/2 46.00 2.00

5-Year Note 10/2 47.00 2.00

7-Year Note 10/2 37.00 1.00 112.44 30.56

3-Year Note 10/16 47.00 3.00

10-Year Note (r) 10/16 34.00 2.00

30-Year Bond (r) 10/16 20.00 2.00 39.56 61.44

20-Year Bond (r) 10/31 13.00 1.00

5-Year TIPS 10/31 23.00 2.00

2-Year Note 10/31 49.00 3.00

2-Year FRN 10/31 26.00 2.00

5-Year Note 10/31 50.00 3.00

7-Year Note 10/31 39.00 2.00 178.34 21.66

3-Year Note 11/15 50.00 3.00

10-Year Note 11/15 40.00 3.00

30-Year Bond 11/15 26.00 3.00 102.17 13.83

2-Year FRN (r) 11/24 24.00 2.00 0.00 24.00

20-Year Bond 11/30 18.00 2.00

10-Year TIPS (r) 11/30 15.00 0.00

2-Year Note 11/30 52.00 3.00

5-Year Note 11/30 53.00 3.00

7-Year Note 11/30 41.00 2.00 105.71 73.29

3-Year Note 12/15 53.00 3.00

10-Year Note (r) 12/15 37.00 3.00

30-Year Bond (r) 12/15 23.00 3.00 44.22 68.78

5-Year TIPS (r) 12/29 21.00 2.00

2-Year FRN (r) 12/29 24.00 2.00 0.00 45.00

921.00 582.45 338.55

Estimates are italicized. r = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 852

* This Financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue

debt in the future.

** Maturing amount is based on private holdings as of 07/31/2023 and subject to change based on Fed purchases.

^ Change is with respect to previous auction. For securities with reopenings, change from new cusip to new cusip, 1st reopening

 to 1st reopening, and etc.
#### JORDAN MARSH COMPANY, a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Anne S. LEVENE, Appellee.

No. 73-1358.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60298

Conference Calendar

 

COREY WALKER; GARY WATSON; GARY LEE MOORE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

EDWARD HARGETT; PATTY LEGG; 

DAVID COLLINS; CO-1 MELTON;

CO-1 HOOPER; CO-1 WATSON; 

CO-1 HARRISON; CO-1 SNEED;

CO-1 HAWKINS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-140-B-B

- - - - - - - - - -

December 11, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Corey Walker (Mississippi prisoner #94700) and Gary Watson

(Mississippi prisoner #82484) have failed to properly notice an

appeal of the district court's dismissal of their suit. Their

appeal is DISMISSED for want of appellate jurisdiction. See

Carter v. Stalder, 60 F.3d 238, 239 (5th Cir. 1995).
No. 96-60298

- 2 -

Gary Lee Moore (Mississippi prisoner #65396) appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit as frivolous. 

Because Moore has failed to raise an issue which is cognizable

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment. 

See Sandin v. Conner, 115 S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D.
Paul Dascoli, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Express, Inc. for the year ended February 1, 2014;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------
|Date: June 17, 2014 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ D. Paul Dascoli            
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | D. Paul Dascoli                
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief   
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 10.15SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONThe following summarizes the compensation payable to each non-employee director of CardiogenesisCorporation (the “Company”) as of January 1, 2007:Each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer of $12,000 (payable quarterly) and a permeeting fee of $2,500 for each regularly scheduled quarterly meeting of the Board of Directorsattended in person by such director as well as reimbursement for travel expenses associated withattendance at any such meeting.In addition, the chairmen of the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and CorporateGovernance Committee will receive an additional annual retainer of $5,000, $2,500 and $2,000 peryear (payable quarterly). Members of the Audit Committee other than the chairman will receive anadditional annual retainer of $2,500 (payable quarterly).Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 1996 Director Stock Option Plan, as currently in effect,each non-employee director of the Company receives an option to purchase 22,500 shares of CommonStock upon his election to the Board of Directors and subsequent option grants of 7,500 shares uponhis re-election each year (provided that such re-election is at least six months after the date ofinitial election to the Board of Directors). The exercise price is 100% of the closing price of theCompany’s common stock on the date prior to the grant date. Initial option grants vest as toone-third of the shares on each yearly anniversary of the grant date until fully vested. Subsequentoption grants vest in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant. If the non-employeedirector ceases to serve as a director for any reason, vesting shall cease as of the date of suchtermination and shall be exercisable for 60 days following termination except in the case of deathor disability in which case the option shall be exercisable for a period of 12 months followingtermination as a director.Directors who are employees of the Company would not receive any additional compensation for theirservice on the Board.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-344]



[[Page 1104]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-100-001]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

January 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 27, 1996, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective December 27, 1996:

Second Revised Sheet No. 1
First Revised Substitute Sixth Revised Sheet No. 5-A
Substitute First Revised Third Revised Sheet No. 200
Substitute First Revised Sheet No. 212

    Northwest states that this filing is being submitted to provide 
revised tariff sheets to comply with the Commission's December 17, 1996 
Letter Order in this docket related to tariff changes previously 
submitted by Northwest as required by Order Nos. 581, 582, and 582-A.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-344 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 12   AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)    Three Months EndedNine Months EndedSeptember 30,September 30,(dollars in thousands)2007200620072006Earnings:
Income before provision for income taxes$  78,722$145,696$     96,036$   526,264Interest expense303,014292,614897,207825,987Implicit interest in rents5,4595,06216,13815,032Total earnings$387,195$443,372$1,009,381$1,367,283Fixed charges:
Interest expense$303,014$292,614$   897,207$   825,987Implicit interest in rents5,4595,06216,13815,032Total fixed charges$308,473$297,676$   913,345$   841,019Ratio of earnings to fixed charges1.261.491.111.63    43