alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
254 La. 838

#### Joshua FRANK v. ST. LANDRY PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 50081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Joshua Frank applying for cer-tiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 225 So.2d 62.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal its judgment is correct.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33558]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Pennsylvania Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Pennsylvania Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
12:30 p.m. and adjourn at 4:45 p.m. on Thursday, January 15, 1998, at 
the General Services Administration, Wannamaker Building, Room 854, 100 
Penn Square East, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107. The purpose of the 
meeting is to provide an orientation session for new members and to 
plan a future briefing on barriers confronting women and minority 
business owners.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson Sieglinde 
Shapiro, 215-204-6749, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern 
Regional Office, 202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired 
persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign 
language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 15, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-33558 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7150 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7150

 To require the use of body cameras for law enforcement officers as a 
  condition of eligibility for COPS ON THE BEAT grants, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2020

 Mr. Stanton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the use of body cameras for law enforcement officers as a 
  condition of eligibility for COPS ON THE BEAT grants, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COPS Accountability Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. BODY CAMERA REQUIREMENT FOR COPS ON THE BEAT GRANTS.

    In order to be eligible for a grant under part Q of title I of the 
Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10381 et 
seq.), a State, unit of local government, and Indian tribal government 
shall--
            (1) in the first fiscal year that begins after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, have in place a plan to implement the 
        requirement under paragraph (2); and
            (2) in the second fiscal year that begins after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, require uniformed law enforcement 
        officers with the authority to conduct searches and make 
        arrests to wear a body camera while on duty, for not less than 
        25 percent of such law enforcement officers of the 
        jurisdiction; and
            (3) beginning in the third fiscal year that begins after 
        the date of enactment of this Act, require uniformed law 
        enforcement officers with the authority to conduct searches and 
        make arrests to wear a body camera while on duty, for not less 
        than 50 percent of such law enforcement officers of the 
        jurisdiction.

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    On an annual basis, the Attorney General shall submit to the 
Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the 
Senate a report on the compliance of jurisdictions with the conditions 
on eligibility for grants described in section 2 during the previous 
fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
Document

Exhibit 10.1





FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), effective as of August 1, 2021, is made and entered into by and between Service Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”), and The RMR Group LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (the “Manager”).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Manager are parties to that certain Second Amended and Restated Business Management Agreement, dated as of June 5, 2015 (the “Business Management Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Manager wish to amend certain provisions of the Business Management Agreement as hereinafter provided;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements herein set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.The definition of “SNL Index” included in Section 11 of the Business Management Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety by the following:
“Index” shall mean (i) the SNL U.S. REIT Hotel Index, as published from time to time, for all periods ending prior to August 1, 2021 and (ii) the MSCI U.S. REIT/Hotel & Resort REIT Index, as published from time to time, for all periods beginning on or after August 1, 2021.
2.The Business Management Agreement shall be amended by deleting all references therein to “SNL Index” and replacing them with references to the “Index”.
3.As amended hereby, the Business Management Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
4.The provisions of this Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Maryland.
5.This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts, each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.


[Signature page follows]












IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers, as of the date first written above.
SERVICE PROPERTIES TRUST
By: /s/ John G. Murray        
Name: John G. Murray
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
THE RMR GROUP LLC
By: /s/ Matthew P. Jordan  
Name: Matthew P. Jordan
Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
[Signature Page to Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Business Management Agreement]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Brown, Appellant.

[737 NYS2d 299]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 7, 2001 *(People v Brown,*283 AD2d 437), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 13, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

*560The appellant has failed, to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Ritter, Acting P.J., McGinity, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Aubrey Joseph LeCOMPTE.

No. 60895.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 2, 1977.

In re: Aubrey Joseph LeCompte applying for writs of habeas corpus and mandamus. Parish of St. Martin.

Writ granted. Out of time appeal ordered. District Judge ordered to appoint appellate counsel.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ML Life Insurance Company of New York
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Joseph E. Justice, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ JOSEPH E. JUSTICE
Joseph E. Justice
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 26, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ML Life Insurance Company of New York and will be retained by ML
Life Insurance Company of New York and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In re Adoption Petition of Johnny Earl CLOUD, joined by his wife, Barbara May Cloud.

No. 70-688.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 10, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 3, 2021

NO. 03

- 21

- 00255

- CV

D. H. , Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIE F JUS TICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

CONCURRING OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the decree terminating appellant ’ s parental rights signed by the tr i a l court

on May 21, 2021

. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that

there was no reversibl e error in the decree

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s decree

of termination

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated
March 1, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Cryo-Cell International, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Cryo-Cell International, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-92991, effective December 17, 1999 and File No. 333-65418, effective July 19, 2001).



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP        
|                              
|Orlando, Florida March 1, 2010
#### Jay Clayson MILLS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-1144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 22, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 31, 1971.

Engel & Halpefn, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Bruce L. Scheiner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant Jay Clayson Mills was charged by information with having caused the death of a certain person by culpable negligence in the operation of an automobile, in violation of § 782.07 Fla.Stat., F.S. A. He was tried before a jury, found guilty, and was so adjudged by the court. His contentions on appeal therefrom are that the state failed to prove a prima facie case; that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; that the court committed error in the admission of certain evidence over objection and in overruling an objection made to the testimony of certain witnesses. We have considered appellant’s contentions in the light of the record and briefs and find them to be without merit. The challenged rulings of the trial court were not shown to be an abuse of discretion, and in our opinion the record shows the verdict to have been supported by competent substantial evidence.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1

        

      

        SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

      FIRST CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANK

      SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

      

      

      This Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the First Citizens Community Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended (the “SERP”), is effective as of August 23, 2021.

      

      

      W I T N E S S E T H:

      

      

      WHEREAS, First Citizens Community Bank (the “Bank”) maintains the SERP for the benefit of certain senior officers; and

      

      

      WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Bank resolved to amend the SERP to make certain modifications to the definition of the term Final Average Pay, effective as of August 23, 2021.

      

      

      NOW, THEREFORE, the SERP is hereby amended as follows:

      

      

      	

            	1.	
              The following defined term is hereby added to Article I of the SERP:

            


      

      

      “Compensation” means all compensation reportable on Box 1 of Form W-2, including, without limitation, in respect of salary, bonus and the vesting of shares of restricted stock, plus any amounts contributed by the Executive
          pursuant to a salary reduction agreement to a qualified deferred compensation plan described in Section 401(k) of the Code or a cafeteria plan described in Section 125 of the Code maintained by the Bank.

      

      

      	

            	2.	
              The definition of the term “Final Average Pay” is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:

            


      

      

      “Final Average Pay” means the average of an Executive’s annual Compensation during the three completed calendar years preceding the Executive’s termination of employment; provided, however, that solely with respect to the
          Executives identified in Appendix B to the Plan, if, at any time during the three completed calendar years preceding the Executive’s termination of employment, the Executive transitioned to a different position with the Company and his or her
          salary was reduced in connection with such transition, then the Executive’s Final Average Pay shall be determined based on the three completed calendar years preceding the calendar year during which the Executive transitioned to such different
          position.

      

      

      	

            	3.	
              Appendix B attached to this Amendment is hereby added as Appendix B to the Plan.

            


      

      

      
        
          


      

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer on August 23, 2021.

      

      

      	 	
              By:

            	
              Gina M Boor

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
              Title:

            	
              Corporate Secretary 

            	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	
              Signature:

            	
              /S/ Gina M Boor 

                

            	 


      

      

      
        
          


      

      APPENDIX B

      

      

      Randall E. Black

      Mickey L. Jones
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-29-1998
<CASH>                                          24,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     78,765
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,371
<PP&E>                                         390,682
<DEPRECIATION>                               (133,249)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,711
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,925
<BONDS>                                        218,495
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,207
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,711
<SALES>                                        146,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,024
<CGS>                                          121,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  121,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,585
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,528
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,029
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,029
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1998
<CASH>                                           8,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     80,621
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,631
<PP&E>                                         383,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 564,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          141,557
<BONDS>                                        229,696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,206
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   564,344
<SALES>                                        277,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               277,954
<CGS>                                          233,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,450
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,130
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,779
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,351
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,351
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
        

</TABLE>
SCEC-22-0000682

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

JAMES RYAN MALISH and KARL O. DICKS, Plaintiffs,

vs.

SCOTT NAGO, acting in official capacity of Chief Election 

Officer, STATE OF HAWAIʻI OFFICE OF ELECTIONS, 

and ELECTIONS COMMISSION, Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN PART

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

On November 4, 2022, Plaintiffs filed an election 

complaint that appears to seek relief under the primary election 

contest statute, HRS § 11-173.5. It is beyond the allowable 

time to seek relief under HRS § 11-173.5. See HRS § 11-173.5(a) 

(“In a primary . . . election contest, . . . the complaint shall 

be filed in the office of the clerk of the supreme court no

later than 4:30 p.m. on the thirteenth day after a primary . . . 

election[.]”). To the extent Plaintiffs’ arguments seek relief 

under HRS § 11-173.5, these claims are untimely. Accordingly, 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCEC-22-0000682

14-NOV-2022

08:44 AM

Dkt. 8 ORD
2

It is ordered that the complaint is dismissed in part, 

or to the extent relief is sought under HRS § 11-173.5. The

court will instead construe the complaint as a general election 

contest. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, November 14, 2022.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from
     Agrilink Foods,  Inc. Form 10-Q for the period ended September 26, 1998 and
     is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000026285
<NAME>                        Agrilink Foods, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jun-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-26-1998
<CASH>                                            9057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  109,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    395,280
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               546,146
<PP&E>                                         383,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                  66,175
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,256,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          324,211
<BONDS>                                             15
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     176,554 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,256,950 
<SALES>                                        182,579 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,579 
<CGS>                                          135,882 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (24,313)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,336 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,674 
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,334 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,340 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 16,366 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,974 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0  
              
                                               

</TABLE>