alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





SHADES HOLDINGS, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this annual report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 of Shades Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lucien G. Lalloiz, Principal Executive and Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



1. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date: November
    8, 2013 | Shades Holdings, Inc.
|-------------------------- | ---------------------
|                           | By                   
|                           |
Financial Literacy and Education Commission Public Meeting 

T﻿﻿hursday, September 30, 2010 at 10:00 AM 

U.S. Department of the Treasury - Cash Room

Welcome

Michael S. Barr, Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions 

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Update

Peggy Twohig, Director, Office of Consumer Protection

U.S. Department of the Treasury

Financial Literacy and Education Commission Updates 

National Strategy: Barbara Smith, Office of Retirement Policy, 

Social Security Administration

Core Competencies: Luke Reynolds, Chief, Outreach & Program Development Section, 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Outreach and 

Communication: 

Colleen Tressler, Senior Project Manager 

Div. of Consumer and Business Education, 

Federal Trade Commission

Featured Speakers

Amar Parikh, Director, 

Corporate Affairs

Ariel Investments

Discussing 401(k) Plans in Living Color: A Study of 401(k) 

Disparities Across Racial and Ethnic Groups and financial 

literacy implications

Ray Kirk, Manager, Benefits 

Officers Training & 

Development Group 

Office of Personnel 

Management

Discussing Federal Employee Participation Patterns in the 

Thrift Savings Plan Study

Announcement

The next Commission meeting will be held on January 26, 2011.

Conclusion

Diploma

&
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10: 30 a.m., Wednesday, February 12, 1997.
PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule enforcement review.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-3487 Filed 2-7-97; 11:58 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Order entered May 16, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00350 - CV LE - VEL BRANDS, LLC, Appellant

V. LACORE ENTERPRISES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 380t h Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380 - 06772 - 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s May 14, 2019 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to J une 13, 2019

. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION    EXTRACTED    FROM   THE   FINANCIAL
                              STATEMENTS  AS OF June 30,1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
                              ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                                                863557
<NAME>                        SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                                3,580
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        65,457
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           4,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     95,862
<PP&E>                                              351,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                       94,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      362,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                78,812
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 39
<OTHER-SE>                                          145,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        362,317
<SALES>                                             261,734
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    261,734
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       242,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (320)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3,439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      16,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                          7,215
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   9,343
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          9,343
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .24
        
<FN>
EPS-PRIMARY  and  EPS-DILUTED  are  restated to include the impact of  Financial
Accounting  Standards  Board Statement No. 128 and the effect of a 3-for-2 stock
split payable on March 12, 1998.
</FN>

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JEFFREY ALLEN COLE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-4519 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 4, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County; Don Thomas Hall, Judge. Jeffrey Allen Cole, pro se. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Blain A. Goff, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, LUCAS, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
9

­ 1 5

­ 2 0 1 5

E X P R e a l t y ’ s D r o n e O p e r a t i o n a l S a f e t y P l a n & P r o c e d u r e s

1

. E n s u r e t h e a r e a a b o u t t o b e f l o w n h a s n o o b s t r u c t i o n s s u c h a s p o w e r l i n e s o r t r e e s

.

2

. T u r n o n t h e D J I a p p l i c a t i o n o n t h e I p h o n e 5 s

3

. T u r n o n t h e D J I P h a n t o m

4

. M a k e s u r e a l l s y s t e m s a r e g o o d a n d c o n n e c t e d

.

5

. T u r n o n E n g i n e s

, m a k e s u r e a l l s y s t e m s s t a y i n t h e g r e e n z o n e

6

. F l y s l o w l y u n d e r 1 0 M P H i n a n y d i r e c t i o n

7

. D o n o t f l y o v e r 2 0 0 F T

8

. S l o w l y p a n a r e a a r o u n d t h e o u t s i d e o f p r o p e r t y t h a t y o u a r e f i l m i n g

. 9

. A l w a y s k e e p t h e D r o n e w i t h i n l i n e o f s i g h t

.

1 0

. L a n d d r o n e a n d p o w e r o f

f e n g i n e s a n d p o w e r

.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32818]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement(s) Filed

    The Commission hereby given notice of the filing of the following 
agreement(s) under the Shipping Act of 1984.
    Interested parties can review or obtain copies of agreements at the 
Washington, DC offices of the Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
N.W., Room 962. Interested parties may submit comments on an agreement 
to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, 
within 10 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

Agreement No.: 202-010689-069
Title: Transpacific Westbound Rate Agreement.
Parties:
    American President Lines, Ltd. (``APL'')
    Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GmbH
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.
    P&O Nedlloyd B.V.
    P&O Nedlloyd Limited
    Neptune Orient Container Line, Inc. (``NOL'')
    Nippon Yusen Kaisha, Ltd.
    Orient Overseas Container Line, Inc.
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.
Synopsis: The proposed amendment provides that, as affiliated 
companies, APL and NOL shall have a single vote on Agreement matters.

Agreement No.: 202-011528-005
Title: Japan/U.S. Eastbound Freight Conference
Parties:
    American President Lines, Ltd. (``APL'')
    Hapag-Lloyd Container Line GmBH
    Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.
    Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.
    A.P. Moller-Maersk Line
    Neptune Orient Lines, Ltd. (``NOL'')
    Orient Overseas Container Line (U.S.A.)
    P&O Nedlloyd B.V.
    P&O Nedlloyd Limited
    Sea-Land Service, Inc.
    Wilhelmsen Lines AS
Synopsis: The proposed amendment provides that APL and NOL shall be 
considered a single member for voting and quorum purposes in conducting 
the Agreement's business.

    Dated: December 11, 1997.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.
Ronald D. Murphy,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-32818 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
1

Filed 8/26/13

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

GEORGE HANNA,

Defendant and Appellant. C067178

(Super. Ct. No. 10 F00181)

ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN

JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 31, 2013, be modified as follows:

Delete the last sentence that begins on page eight and continues on pa ge nine and

replace with the following sentence:

The trial court correctly instructed on the elements of attempted lewd act with a

child under 14 years of age.2

This modification does not change the judgment.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

THE COURT:

NICHOLSON

, Acting P. J.

MAURO , J.

HOCH , J.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER98-445-000]


Northern/AES Energy LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

December 23, 1997.
    Northern/AES Energy LLC (Northern/AES) filed an application to 
engage in the wholesale sale of electric capacity and energy at market-
based rates, and for certain waivers and authorizations. In particular, 
Northern/AES requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 
18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liabilities by Northern/AES. On December 23, 1997, the Commission 
issued an Order Conditionally Accepting For filing Proposed Market-
Based Rates (Order), in the above-docketed proceeding.
    The Commission's December 23, 1997 Order granted the request for 
blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the conditions found in 
Ordering Paragraphs (C), (D), and (F):
    (c) Within 30 days of the date of issuance of this order, any 
person desiring to be heard or to protest the Commission's blanket 
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities by 
Northern/AES should file a motion to intervene or protest with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214.
    (D) Absent a request to be heard within the period set forth in 
Ordering Paragraph (C) above, Northern/AES is hereby authorized to 
issue securities and assume obligations and liabilities as guarantor, 
indorser, surety or otherwise in respect of any security of another 
person; provided that such issue or assumption is for some lawful 
object within the corporate purposes of Northern/AES, compatible with 
the public interest, and reasonably necessary or appropriate for such 
purposes.
    (F) The Commission reserves the right to modify this order to 
require a further showing that neither public nor private interests 
will be adversely affected by continued Commission approval of 
Northern/AES's issuances of securities or assumptions of liabilities * 
* *.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to 
intervene or protests, as set forth above, is January 22, 1998.
    Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the 
Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, N.E., 
Washington, D.C. 20426.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34116 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<PAGE>18

                          Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc.

                Exhibit 11 - Statement re Computation of per share earnings

                                 Nine Months Ended        Three Months Ended
                                 
                                 1995         1994        1995         1994

 1. Net Income (in millions)    $ 68.8       $ 90.9     ($ 19.9)    ($  7.4)  

 2. Weighted average number of 
     shares outstanding during
     the period                90,105,240   89,028,346  90,469,197  89,115,758

 3. Earnings per share based
     upon average outstanding
     shares (1/2)               $  0.76      $  1.02     ($  0.22)  ($  0.08)
 
 4. Net shares issuable upon
     exercise of dilutive
     outstanding stock options
     (treasury stock method)      516,409      865,453     372,073     798,528
       
 5. Fully diluted shares(2+4)  90,621,649   89,893,799  90,841,270  89,914,286

 6. Fully diluted earnings
     per share (1/5)            $  0.76      $  1.01     ($  0.22)  ($  0.08)


</page>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended April 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Dale R. Black, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

|                    |  |                                                        
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 24, 2009 |  | /s/ DALE R. BLACK Dale R. Black
Chief Financial Officer

---



QuickLinks
May 06 2015 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

### FAA Docket 2014

- 0886
Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment of Section 333 Exemption Based upon Exemption 11204

Issued to Build Imagery, LLC

Dear Sir or Madam,

Build Imagery LLC ( Build Imagery) herewith applies to amend to our existing Exemption 11204 issued to Build Imagery on March 11,2015 in FAA Docket 2014

- 0886

. The requested amendment would allow Build Imagery to operate the SOLO aircraft manufactured by 3D Robotics. It is our believe that the SOLO offers a more up to date flight control system as well as an improved on

- board flight processors. This will improve flight characteristics and add to safe flight operations.

The name and contact information for the applicant are:

Daniel Ursitti Build Imagery LLC 11870 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 106

- 433 West Los Angeles, CA

310

- 467

- 6006 Dursitti@Buildimagery.com

Build Imagery intends to operate the SOLO from 3D Robotics and will operate it in strict compliance with the conditions set forth in Exemption 11204. We understand that such conditions may be amended or modifie d by the FAA from time to time and we will look to the FAA for guidance, recommendations and modificatio n to always adhere to best our flight operations and procedures. Build Imagery will maintain all of its original "Aerial Systems Operations Manuel" and "Flight Checklist" as displayed in 11204. We will additionally submit

1) SOLO Aircraft Description and Operations Manuel

The information contained in the above document is proprietary and not for public display. For that reason the above information will be submitted directly to 333exemtion@faa.gov.

These manuals are very similar to the manuals subm itted by Build Imagery in support of the issuance of Exemption 11204

, the manuals will be updated by Build Imager y and or

3D Robotics as needed to reflect any changes to Exemption 11204 , based on amendments

thereto.To the extent necessary, Build Imagery refers the FAA to the original exemption submitted by Build Imagery in Docket FAA

- 2014

- 0886 for demonstration of the public interest and an equivalent level of safety. Build Imagery will operate the aircraft in strict compliance with the conditions in existing the exemption previously granted by the FAA

.

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

Daniel Ursitti Build Imagery Dursitti@BuildImagery.com
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(i)

March 29, 2000

Relational Investors, LLC
4330 La Jolla Village Drive
Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92212
Re:  Termination Agreement

Gentlemen:

Relational Investors, LLC ("Relational") recently requested that Nuevo Energy
Company ("Company") consider the termination of the March 1, 1999 Letter
Agreement between Relational and the Company ("Letter Agreement").  Among other
things, the Letter Agreement sets out the duties and obligations of each party
upon election to the Board of a director proposed by Relational.  The Letter
Agreement further required that the director submit an undated letter of
resignation.

Having fully considered the request submitted by Relational, the Company concurs
that the Letter Agreement should be terminated and that the director should be
permitted to withdraw the undated letter of resignation.

Therefore, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing to each party,
Relational and the Company agree that, effective March 29, 2000, the Letter
Agreement is cancelled and terminated for all purposes and shall be of no
further force or effect.  Each party hereby releases the other from any and all
future obligations, duties or liabilities associated with the Letter Agreement.
The undated letter of resignation which was required by the Letter Agreement is
hereby voided and is deemed by the parties to be withdrawn for all purposes.

If the foregoing accurately sets out our agreement, please so indicate by
executing both copies of this letter and returning one copy to me.  This
document may be executed in two counterparts which together shall constitute a
single agreement.

Yours very truly,

NUEVO ENERGY COMPANY

By:  /s/ Douglas L. Foshee
     ---------------------
     Douglas L. Foshee

Confirmed and agreed to as of
the date first written above,

RELATIONAL INVESTORS, LLC,
on behalf of itself and its affiliates,
associates, and David Batchelder.

By:  /s/ David H. Batchelder
     -----------------------
     David H. Batchelder
#### Judith A. LIPPINCOTT, Appellant, v. Charles M. LIPPINCOTT, Appellee.

No. 73-1162.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 18, 1973.

*145William John Mason, Miami, for appellant.

M. Donald Drescher, South Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, ex-wife, by interlocutory appeal seeks review of the court’s order awarding custody of the six minor children to appellee, ex-husband.

On November 22, 1972, Judge Huttoe entered a final judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties and awarding custody of the six minor children to appellee, ex-husband, “pending receipt by the court of the report from Family Services, State Welfare Department, the final award of custody to abide the recommendation therein set forth.” Nine months later the report of the Family Services investigator was presented to Judge Huttoe’s successor, Judge Grossman, along with the testimony of the parties. The report recommended that the two older children remain in the custody of the appellee and the remaining four children be remanded to the custody of the appellant. After a full hearing and interview with the six children, Judge Grossman awarded custody of all the children to appellee. This interlocutory appeal ensued.

Appellant contends that a successor judge may not change the terms of a final judgment entered by her predecessor judge and therefore it was error to have awarded custody of the six children to the appellee.

In a dissolution of marriage proceeding, it is the court which makes the final determination of custody of the minor children. Fla.Stat. § 61.13(2), F.S.A. Further, in making this determination the chancellor has a very large discretion. Gunter v. Gunter, Fla.App.1969, 219 So.2d 743.

Turning to the case sub judice, we find that Judge Grossman was not bound to follow her predecessor’s decision to make a final award of custody as recommended in the Family Services report, which is not binding upon the court although it may be taken into consideration. Judge Grossman heard the testimony of the parties, considered the report, interviewed the six children and then based upon all of the above made her final award of custody. There being no abuse of discretion demonstrated, we hereby affirm the order awarding custody of the six children to appellee.

Affirmed.
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2012-0421 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-042-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval 

Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to 

submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “Ex Parte Contacts.”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON 

CONTACTED

DATE RESPONSE

ATA Mr. Joe White Dec 10, 2010 No response.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information: