alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS 

Embargoed Until 9 a.m. EST Contact: Brookly McLaughlin 

November 16, 2005 (202) 622-1996 

TREASURY INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL DATA FOR SEPTEMBER 

Treasury International Capital (TIC) data for September are released today and posted on the U.S. 

Treasury web site (www.treas.gov/tic). The next release date, which will report on data for 

October, is scheduled for December 15, 2005. 

Net foreign purchases of long-term securities were $101.9 billion. 

• Net foreign purchases of long-term domestic securities were $118.1 billion, $4.3 billion of 

which were net purchases by foreign official institutions and $113.8 billion of which were 

net purchases by private foreign investors. 

• U.S. residents purchased a net $16.2 billion in foreign issued securities. 

Foreigners’ Transactions in Long-Term Securities with U.S. Residents 

(Billions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted)

12 Months Through

2003 2004 Sep-04 Sep-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 Sep-05 

1 Gross Purchases of Domestic Securities 13526.0 15178.9 14514.5 16877.4 1530.1 1279.0 1414.6 1656.5

2 Gross Sales of Domestic Securities 12806.1 14262.5 13647.9 15866.3 1435.2 1177.9 1326.7 1538.4

3 Domestic Securities Purchased, net (line 1 less line 2) /1 719.9 916.4 866.6 1011.1 94.9 101.0 87.9 118.1

4 Private, net /2 585.0 680.8 621.8 872.5 71.9 90.7 83.5 113.8

5 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 159.7 150.9 156.0 218.1 -0.9 24.9 25.0 22.9

6 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 129.9 205.6 159.4 221.0 17.1 32.1 16.9 18.4

7 Corporate Bonds, net 260.3 298.0 282.4 346.4 51.9 23.3 38.1 48.9

8 Equities, net 35.0 26.2 23.9 87.0 3.8 10.3 3.6 23.6

9 Official, net 134.9 235.6 244.8 138.6 23.0 10.4 4.4 4.3

10 Treasury Bonds & Notes, net 103.8 201.1 208.7 90.7 16.7 3.6 3.2 -1.1

11 Gov't Agency Bonds, net 25.9 20.8 26.3 28.8 3.2 5.7 -1.2 2.2

12 Corporate Bonds, net 5.4 11.5 9.4 17.5 2.6 1.4 2.1 2.2

13 Equities, net -0.3 2.2 0.4 1.7 0.6 -0.3 0.3 1.0

14 Gross Purchases of Foreign Securities 2761.8 3123.1 3064.4 3438.9 307.9 273.3 311.7 318.9

15 Gross Sales of Foreign Securities 2818.4 3276.0 3200.7 3592.4 321.0 287.1 310.6 335.1

16 Foreign Securities Purchased, net (line 14 less line 15) /3 -56.5 -152.8 -136.3 -153.5 -13.1 -13.8 1.1 -16.2

17 Foreign Bonds Purchased, net 32.0 -67.9 -62.2 -35.4 -1.2 -5.1 17.1 -9.1

18 Foreign Equities Purchased, net -88.6 -85.0 -74.2 -118.1 -11.8 -8.7 -16.0 -7.0

19 Net Long-Term Flows (line 3 plus line 16) 663.3 763.6 730.3 857.6 81.8 87.3 89.0 101.9

/1 Net foreign purchases of U.S. securities (+)

/2 Includes International and Regional Organizations

/3 Net U.S. acquisitions of foreign securities (-)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.14
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Richard M. Drew, a member of the
Board of Directors of ML Life Insurance Company of New York (the "Company"),
whose signature appears below, constitutes and appoints Barry G. Skolnick and
Michael P. Cogswell, respectively, and each of them, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any
and all Registration Statements and Amendments thereto, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, under
the Investment Company Act of 1940, where applicable, and the Securities Act of
1933, respectively, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the purpose
of registering any and all variable life and variable annuity separate accounts
(collectively "Separate Accounts"), of the Company that may be established in
connection with the issuance of any and all variable life and variable annuity
contracts funded by such Separate Accounts, granting unto said attorney-in-fact
and agent, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done.



                Date:   MARCH 29, 2000  /s/ RICHARD M. DREW
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Richard M. Drew

                State of NEW YORK  )
                County of Queens   )

        On the 29 day of of MARCH, 2000, before me came Richard M. Drew,
Director of ML Life Insurance Company of New York, to me known to be said person
and he signed the above Power of Attorney on behalf of ML Life Insurance Company
of New York.

              /s/ Peter A. Fermoselle
           -----------------------------
[SEAL]              Notary Public

                  Peter A. Fermoselle
                  Notary Public, State of New York
                  No. 01-4963227
                  Qualified in Queens County
                  Cert. filed in Nassau County
                  Commission Expires 6/10/2000
II 

Calendar No. 486 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7036 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhancement and 

Reform Act of 2004 to repeal the sunset provision. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antitrust Criminal 

5 Penalty Enhancement and Reform Permanent Extension 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. FINDINGS; PURPOSE. 

8 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

9 (1) Conspiracies among competitors to fix 

10 prices, rig bids, and allocate markets are categoriVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:23 Jun 30, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7036.PCS H7036

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 7036 PCS

1 cally and irredeemably anticompetitive and con2 travene the competition policy of the United States. 

3 (2) Cooperation incentives are important to the 

4 efforts of the Antitrust Division of the Department 

5 of Justice to prosecute and deter the offenses de6 scribed in paragraph (1). 

7 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act, and the 

8 amendments made by this Act, is to strengthen public and 

9 private antitrust enforcement by providing incentives for 

10 antitrust violators to cooperate fully with government 

11 prosecutors and private litigants through the repeal of the 

12 sunset provision of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty En13 hancement and Reform Act of 2004 (15 U.S.C. 1 note). 

14 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF SUNSET PROVISION. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 211 of the Antitrust 

16 Criminal Penalty Enhancement and Reform Act of 2004 

17 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is repealed. 

18 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

19 Section 212 of the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhance20 ment and Reform Act of 2004 (15 U.S.C. 1 note) is 

21 amended— 

22 (1) by striking paragraph (6); and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 7036 PCS

1 (2) by redesignating paragraph (7) as para2 graph (6). 

Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2020. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 486 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7036 

AN ACT 

To amend the Antitrust Criminal Penalty Enhanceset provision. ment and Reform Act of 2004 to repeal the sunJUNE 29, 2020 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Carol GARCIA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 68-569.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 5, 1971.

Harry W. Prebish; Richard M. Gale, Miami, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., HENDRY, J., and LOPEZ, AQUILINO, Jr., Associate Judge.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on June 24, 1969 (226 So.2d 17) reversing the judgment of the circuit court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed October 21, 1970 (240 So.2d 633) and mandate dated November 30, 1970, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment of reversal with directions to reinstate the judgment and sentence;

*444Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on September 9, 1969 is withdrawn the opinion and judgment of this court filed June 24, 1969 is vacated, the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court and the judgment and sentence of the circuit court appealed from herein is reinstated and affirmed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b) F.A.R., 32 F.S. A.).
EXHIBIT
31.1



CERTIFICATION



I,
Jeremiah Silkowski, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofSQN Alternative
    Investment Fund III L.P.; and                                                                                                                                                                                      
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



Date:
April 15, 2019



|/s/
    Jeremiah Silkowski        | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|Jeremiah
    Silkowski            | 
|Chief
    Executive Officer       | 
|(Principal
    Executive Officer) |
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 112 ) ll-E-72 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07

AM Sheet 112 of 264P. 2

T0* d -H1Q 1 

# w A 945 2
From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac t Repor t Plasti c Composite s NESHA P Gre g LaFlam , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Apri l 10,199 6 Mr.DonMcCrad y Eagle-Picher , Plastic s Division , Grabill . IN • Telephon e Number : (219)627-361 2 Contac t Snmmary : Aske d followu

p question s concerning th e company' s respons e t o th e Composite s Institute' s Marc h 199 6 surve y ofth e compressio n molding industry . Th e facilit y ha s converte d fiomth e us e of methylene chloride (539,00 0 gallon s i n 1989 ) t o th e us e o f

non-HA P cleaners . Acetone i s use di n smal l quantitie s t o han dwip e th e docto r bo x ofth e SM C machine . Tbeimoclea n ( aresin emulsifie

r produc t supplie db y Coo k

Composites ) i s use d wit h ho t

water t o flus h line s andclea

n othe r surface s (floor , etc.) . Mr . McCrad y sai d tha t thi s cleaner

i s inexpensiv e an d work s ver y well . Th e facilit y operate s tw o shifts pe r

day . During th e day , shift s fro mlighter t o darke r color s (primaril y gray s an d black , wit h som e tan ) ar e mad e without an y specia l cleanin g ofth e line s (othe r

the n flushin g wit

h paste) . However , a

t th e endofth e secon dshift , athoroug h cleanin g mus t

b e perfonne d s o tha

t productio n o f

alighte r colo r can b e initiale dat

th e start ofth e nex t day . Themiociea

n i s use d in thi s cleaning operation .

REPORT I S ACCURAT

E

- D 4 ci a QOCKE T

10/10' d T9££ iZ3 6T 2 Tuaoa a a3H3i d aiat a &>: ST <L66T-S2-S3 d
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 15, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10325 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. RICHARD KEITH DOYLE Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-11
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Richard Keith Doyle appeals the sentence he received upon revocation of his term of supervised release. He argues that the sentence is unreasonable because it exceeds the sentencing range recommended by the relevant policy statements in the Sentencing Guidelines and because the district court failed to specify its reasons for the sentence. The Government has moved to dismiss the appeal or for summary affirmance on the basis that we lack jurisdiction to consider it under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(4). Because Doyle cannot prevail on theNo. 06-10325

2 merits of his appeal, we pretermit consideration ofthejurisdictional issue. See United States v. Weathersby, 958 F.2d 65, 66 (5th Cir. 1992). Doyle incorrectly asserts that the district court failed to provide sufficient justification for the sentence. The court stated that it read his background information in the Presentence Report (PSR) and that it considered the evidence, the violation, Doyle’s admission of the violation, the arguments of counsel, and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in determining the sentence. According to the PSR, Doyle has a criminal history of category VI, the result of 12 convictions for c

rimes such as passing worthless checks, stealing cars, burglary, embezzlement, assault, and possession of cocaine. The PSR also described additional arrests for crimes such as going AWOL from the military, forgery, theft, and child molestation. In announcing the sentence, the district court explained that it considered the policy statements and the recommended sentencing range of 8-14 months, but they “[did] not begin to address” Doyle’s conduct. Accordingly, Doyle’s 24-month sentence was reasonable and was not imposed in violation of law. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119-20 (5th Cir. 2005). Thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the Government’s motions are DENIED.
#### Forrest YAEGER, Appellant, v. Frank D. TOLIN d/b/a Frank D. Tolin Construction Company, Appellee.

No. 72-750.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 24, 1973.

Rehearing Denied May 22, 1973.

Beckham & McAliley, Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker & Gray and James E. Tribble, Miami, and Mark Hicks, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ„ and MELVIN, WOODROW M., Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellant appeals from a motion for judgment in accord with directed verdict entered by the lower court in favor of defendant-appellee, Frank D. Tolin d/b/a Tolin Construction Company.

*62Pursuant to a standard form A.I.A. construction contract, appellee Frank Tolin built a plant and warehouse for Lora Realty, Tnc. About a year after completion of the building-, plaintiff-appellant, Forrest Yaeger, foreman of a roof repair crew, while bending over the periphery of the warehouse roof, leaned against an outside electrical fixture for support. The fixture collapsed and the plaintiff fell to the ground and suffered serious injuries. He filed a negligence action against appellee Tolin and others. The jury rendered a verdict against appellee Frank D. Tolin d/b/a Frank D. Tolin Construction Company and defendant Ben Benson d/b/a Scott Electric Company. However, the trial court thereafter entered a motion for judgment in accord with directed verdict for the appellee, Frank Tolin.

Appellant basically contends that Tolin, the prime contractor, was negligent in not inspecting the electrical work performed on the building. The cause of the failure of the light fixture in question appeared to be that the bolts fastening it to the building were too short and they did not, therefore, penetrate sufficiently the concrete in the building. The record reflects that the plaster veneer at this particular area was thicker than on other parts of the building. Thus, there remains the question whether an inspection would have failed to reveal that either the bolts were too short or the plaster too thick. More important, a further search of the record disclosed that appellee’s contract was amended and the installation of the light fixtures was deleted from the contract. Thus, under these circumstances there was no showing he had a duty to inspect the installation of the subject fixture. It follows that liability for negligence on the part of Tolin thereby is precluded. See 23 Fla.Jur. Negligence § 9 (1959).

Nevertheless, we have reviewed all the testimony and proper inferences from the testimony in light most favorable to plaintiff the verdict winner,1 and conclude that he has failed to sustain his burden in showing a duty on the part of appellee to inspect.

Accordingly, the judgment herein appealed must be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.

1

. See Krasny v. Richter, Fla.App.1968, 211 So.2d 612; Tranter v. Wible, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 595.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33497]



[[Page 67427]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Region IV, North Florida District, Jacksonville, Florida; 
Advisory Council Meeting; Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, North Florida District 
Office, Jacksonville, Florida, Advisory Council will hold a public 
meeting from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m., January 8, 1998, at the Latin-
American Club, 5110 Lourcey Road, Jacksonville, Florida, to discuss 
such matters as may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small 
Business Administration, or others present.
    For further information, write or call Claudia D. Taylor, U.S. 
Small Business Administration, 7825 Baymeadows Way, Suite 100-B, 
Jacksonville, Florida 32256-7504, telephone (904) 443-1933.
Debra Silimeo,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Communications & Public 
Communications.
[FR Doc. 97-33497 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,996,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,040,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     86,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,239,900
<PP&E>                                       6,535,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,528,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,583,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,507,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,300
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,709,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,583,400
<SALES>                                        625,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               297,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,751,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (876,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (876,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (876,800)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)


</TABLE>
#### Eugene SWEDENBURG v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47210.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 5, 1973.

Hal H. H. McClanahan, III, Columbus, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Karen Gil-foy and Billy L. Gore, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before RODGERS, P. J., and INZER, ROBERTSON, WALKER and BROOM, JJ-

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                          ODYSSEY PICTURES CORPORATION
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Odyssey  Pictures  Corporation  (the
Company)  on Form  10-K/A for the period  ended June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, John
Foster,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Odyssey  Pictures  Corporation  and will be  retained  by  Odyssey
Pictures  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

November 14, 2003

/s/ John Foster
---------------------------
John Foster
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer