UNITED STATES GF AMERICA
BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

)

Jn the Matter of )

)

LIBBEY INC., a corporation, )
) Docket No. 9301

and )

)

)

NEWELI. RUBBERMAID, INC., a corporation.
—.- . re

PROPOSED ORDER

The Scheduling Conference in the above capuoned matter was onginally rescheduled for
July 11, 2002, Respondents |.ibbey inc. and Newel] Rubbermaid, Inc, and Complaint Counsel
having moved for an order to extend the deadline for the Scheduling Conference and for good

cause shown,

ITIS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is postponed until fuly 25,

2002.

D, Michael Chappell
Administrative Law Judge

Dated: July _, 2002


Dated: July 16, 2002

By

Chul Pak
William Diaz
Apnil Tabor

Counsel Supporting the Complaint

Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, DC 20580
(202) 326-2333

Daal ik : ;
April Tabor MR



ATTORNEYS ENTITLED TO NOTICE.

qa) Apnil Taber
Mergers I} Division, Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission
601 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20580
(202) 326-2956

on behalf of Complaint Counsel.
and

(2) James V. Kearney
Bnuce J. Prager
£, Marcellus Williamson
Steven H. Schulman
Geoffrey A. Manne
Matthew R, VanderGoot
Stephen J, Spiegelhalter

LATHAM & WATKINS

555 Eleventh Street, N.W.
Suite 1000

Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
tel: (202) 637-2200

fax: (202) 637-220]

Richard C. Weisberg
512 Prescott Road
Merion, PA 19066
(610) 664-9405

on behalf of Defendant Libbey Iic.:

William §. D’Amico

Marvin R. Lange

Marta Pulaski-Kelly
CHNADBOURNE & PARKE LLP
1200 New Hampshire Avenuc, N.W.
Washington, D.C, 20036

tel: (202) 974-5600

fax: (202) 974-8602

on behali of Defendant Newel] Rubbermaid, Inc.


UNIFED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSIO.

In the Matter of
PUBLIC

LIBBEY INC., a corporation,
Docket No. 930i

and

NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC,, a corporation.

Ln ee ee er ee ee

RESPONDENTS AND COMPLAINT COUNSEL’S JOINT MOTION

TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Pursuant to §4.3(b) of the Commissian’s Rules, 16 C.F.R. §4.3(b), Respondents
Libbey Inc. (“Libbey”) and Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. (“Newell Rubbermaid”) and Complaint
Counsel respectfully request an additional two-week postponement of the prehearing scheduling
conference currently scheduled for July 11, 2002. Respondents and Compiaint Counsel require
the additional time in order to finalize setUement discussions.

As related in their June 10, 2002, motion, Respondents have terminated the
January 21, 2002, Stock Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) relating to Libbey’s proposed
purchase of Newel] Rubbermaid’s Anchor Hocking division {the Agreement superseded the
original June 17, 2001, Stock Purchase Agreement). Accordingly, on une 11, 2002, Libbey and
Newell Rubbermaid each withdrew their respective Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements
Act (“HSR”) Notifications Jrom the Premerger Notification Office.

Respondents and Complaint Counsel are finalizing the details of a proposed
consent agreement that would conclude the adjudicative proceeding. Specifically, Complaint

Counsel has proposed a consent agreement under which the Commission would be entitled to


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BEFORE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

In the Matter of

LIBBEY INC, a corporation,
Docket No. 9301
and

NEWELI. RUBBERMAID, INC., a corparation.

wee

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

1, Matthew R, VanderGoat, hereby certify that on July 10, 2002 a copy of
Respondents and Complaint Counsel’s Joint Motion to Fxtend the Deadline for

the Scheduling Conference was served via hand delivery on the following:

The Ilonorable D. Michac] Chappell (two capies)
Administrative Law Judge

Vederal lrade Commission

600 Pennsyivania Avenue, N.W., Room [04
Washington, D.C. 20580

Apal Tabor

Mergers H Division, Bureau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission

60 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W,
Washington, D.C. 20580

Richard Liebeskind, Assistant Director
Meygers t1 Division, Burcau of Competition
Federal Trade Commission

603 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.

Washingten, D.C. 20580



phir notice if: (1) Libbey were to aequire the stock of Anchoy Hocking or any of the assets of
Anchor Hocking's food service business, or (ji) Newell Rubbermaid were Lo sel! or transfer the
assets of the Anchor Hocking food service business. Libbey and Newell agrec in principle to a
consent agreement containing a prior notice provision with respect to the Anchor Hocking food
service busmess and are in the process of negotialing the final elements af such an agreement

with Complaint Counsel.


Dated: July 10, 2002

By

By

LATIIAM & WATKINS

James V. Keamey

Brace J. Prager

E. Marcellus Williamson
Steven LH. Schulman
Geoffrey A. Manne
Matthew R. VanderGoot
Stephen J. Spiegethalter

555 Eleventh Street, N.W.
Suite 1000

Washington, DC 20004
Tel: (202) 637-2200

Fax: (202) 637-2201

Richard C. Weisberg

512 Prescatt Road
Menon, PA 19066
Tel: (611) 664-9405

Attomeys for Respondent
Libbey Inc,

4
2 Cagis PUL

Matthew R. Van Ot
matthew. vandergoct@]w.com

CHADBOURNE & PARKE LIP

William S. D'Amico
Marvin Lange
Marta Pulaski-Kelly

1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036

Tel: (202) 974-5600

Fax: (202) 974-5602

Attorneys for Respondent
Newel] Rubbermaid, Inc.

Marta Pulaski-Kelly
MPulaski-Kelly@cbadbourne.com