alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 1

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-08-00437-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI — EDINBURG

IN RE IGNACIO VILLARREAL CANTU, 

FERNANDO VILLARREAL CANTU, CONSUELO VILLARREAL CANTU, 

AND MARTHA GUADALUPE VILLARREAL CANTU

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relators, Ignacio Villarreal Cantu, Fernando Villarreal Cantu, Consuelo Villarreal

Cantu, and Martha Guadalupe Villarreal Cantu, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for emergency temporary relief on July 14, 2008. Through this original proceeding,

relators seek to compel the trial court to vacate various orders pertaining to the

guardianship of Raquel Cantu de Villarreal, an incapacitated person.
 This motion for extension of time was mistakenly filed in cause number 13-08-00408, a related 2

appeal in this Court. See In the Guardianship of Raquel Cantu De Villarreal, an Incapacitated Person, No.

13-08-00408-CV. 

2

On July 15, 2008, this Court granted the motion for emergency temporary relief and

ordered all proceedings in the trial court stayed. The Court further requested that the real

parties in interest file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus within ten days. That

same day, real parties in interest, Raquel Villarreal, Marcelo Villarreal, and Carlos

Villarreal, filed a motion for reconsideration of the stay, which was denied by the Court on

July 17, 2008. On July 25, 2008, these same parties filed an “Emergency Motion for Leave

to Determine Motion to Disqualify and Remove Guardian and to Compel Deposit of

Misapplied Funds to the Trial Court’s or this Court’s Registry”. On July 28, 2008, real

parties also filed a motion for extension of time to file their response to the petition for writ

of mandamus.2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and further pleadings filed herein, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the stay previously imposed by this Court is

LIFTED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) ("Unless vacated or modified, an order granting

temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided."). The emergency motion for

leave and the motion for extension of time filed by the real parties in interest, are

DISMISSED as moot, as are any other pending motions. The petition for writ of

mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this 30th day of July, 2008.
#### William Frank MARSHALL, Appellant, v. Don HOLLOWAY, Sheriff of Pennington County, South Dakota, Appellee.

No. 02-1841.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2002.

Filed Aug. 14, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William Marshall appeals from the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment and dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim. The district court determined that Marshall failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Because Marshall was not incarcerated or detained when he filed his complaint, we reverse and remand to the district court to consider his case on its merits. *See Doe v. Washington County,*150 F.3d 920, 924 (8th Cir.1998). We decline to affirm the judgment on a basis not considered by the district court. *See Cavegn v. Twin City Pipe Trades Pension Plan,*223 F.3d 827, 831 (8th Cir.2000). We also deny Marshall’s pending motion.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of GENESIS  COMPANIES GROUP, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Madhava  Rao Mankal,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Madhava Rao Mankal
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Madhava Rao Mankal,  CFO

Dated:  July16, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33366]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Freight Forwarder License; Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight fowarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1718 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Pacat International-Pacific Atlantic International, 1019 Fairway Valley 
Drive, Woodstock, GA 30189, Gunter Wegner, Sole Proprietor
Trafik Services, Inc., 300 Wapanoag Trial, East Providence, RI 02915, 
Officers: Robert A. Mega, President, William Mega, Vice President.

    Dated: December 17, 1997.
Ronald D. Murphy,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33366 Filed 12-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000026285
<NAME> CURTICE BURNS FOODS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-23-1995
<CASH>                                            6228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    71947
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     211590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                308135
<PP&E>                                          273827
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  707280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           175252
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      137372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    707280
<SALES>                                         373364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                373364
<CGS>                                           279141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    78129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4911)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3711)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1917 

AN ACT 

To modify eligibility requirements for certain hazard 

mitigation assistance programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1917 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hazard Eligibility and 

3 Local Projects Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO BEGIN IMPLEMENTATION OF AC5 QUISITION OR RELOCATION PROJECTS. 

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR ASSISTANCE FOR INITIATED

7 PROJECTS.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other 

9 provision of law, an entity seeking assistance under 

10 a hazard mitigation assistance program shall be eli11 gible to receive such assistance for a covered project 

12 if the entity— 

13 (A) complies with all other eligibility re14 quirements of the hazard mitigation assistance 

15 program for acquisition or relocation projects, 

16 including extinguishing all incompatible encum17 brances; and 

18 (B) complies with all Federal requirements 

19 for the project. 

20 (2) COSTS INCURRED.—An entity seeking as21 sistance under a hazard mitigation assistance pro22 gram shall be responsible for any project costs in23 curred by the entity for a covered project if the cov24 ered project is not awarded, or is determined to be 

25 ineligible for, assistance. 
3 

•HR 1917 EH

1 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following defi2 nitions apply: 

3 (1) COVERED PROJECT.—The term ‘‘covered 

4 project’’ means— 

5 (A) an acquisition or relocation project for 

6 which an entity began implementation prior to 

7 grant award under a hazard mitigation assist8 ance program; and 

9 (B) a project for which an entity initiated 

10 planning or construction before or after re11 questing assistance for the project under a haz12 ard mitigation assistance program qualifying 

13 for a categorical exemption under the National 

14 Environmental Policy Act. 

15 (2) HAZARD MITIGATION ASSISTANCE PRO16 GRAM.—The term ‘‘hazard mitigation assistance 

17 program’’ means— 

18 (A) the predisaster hazard mitigation 

19 grant program authorized under section 203 of 

20 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

21 Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5133); 

22 (B) the hazard mitigation grant program 

23 authorized under section 404 of the Robert T. 

24 Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assist25 ance Act (42 U.S.C. 5170c); and 
4 

•HR 1917 EH

1 (C) the flood mitigation assistance pro2 gram authorized under section 1366 of the Na3 tional Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 

4 4104c). 

5 (c) APPLICABILITY.—This section shall apply to 

6 funds appropriated on or after the date of enactment of 

7 this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 4, 

2021. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1917 

AN ACT 

To modify eligibility requirements for certain hazother purposes. ard mitigation assistance programs, and for
#### UNITED NATIONAL CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. Harry HOROWITZ, on Behalf of Meridian 17 Corp., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-827.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                           
           EXHIBIT 15 -- INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT               
 
 
 
The Board of Directors
Cubic Corporation
 
 
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet of 
Cubic Corporation as of June 30, 1997, and the related consolidated condensed 
statement of income for the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 1997 
and 1996, and consolidated condensed statement of cash flows for the 
nine-month periods ended June 30, 1997 and 1996.  These financial statements 
are the responsibility of the Company's management.
 
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the 
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim 
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures 
to financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial 
and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit in 
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be 
performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion 
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not 
express such an opinion.
 
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that 
should be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial 
statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with generally 
accepted accounting principles.
 
We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing 
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of 
September 30, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, 
retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented 
herein) and in our report dated December 4, 1996, we expressed an unqualified 
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the 
information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed balance 
sheet at September 30, 1996, is fairly stated in all material respects in 
relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
 
 
                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
San Diego, California 
August 5, 1997


                                     11
PET RSB RG 

ALASKA 

Sent: Via email to: Kevin Adams 

Kevin.Adams dot._ ov 

January 23, 2013 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave.,S.E. 

Washington D.C. 20590 '/ 

Re: Alaska Airlines - Essential Air Service, Docket OST -1998-4899 · . 

(,.fl 

Alaska Airlines is a critical component to the economic well being of the Southeast Alaska 

communities of Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell and Yakutat. Alaska Airlines' 30 

years of reliable, dedicated service to our communities has been, and continues to be, the most 

important transportation link for both passengers and cargo in this remote, aviation-dependent 

area. 

Alaska's service connects our passengers and cargo to the Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or 

Seattle airports where our community can access the airline's extensive route system and 

benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The passenger and cargo aircraft 

that Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route provides freight, mail and cargo 

capacity that other carriers are unable to provide. In addition, Alaska Airlines aircraft are 

equipped with Required Navigation Performance Technology, enabling the airline to access 

these five community airports during inclement weather. This improved equipment has reduced 

diversions and cancellations, enabling our residents, businesses and products to move 

dependably in and out of the region. 

The Petersburg Borough Assembly strongly urges the Department to .approve the January 8, 

2013 application of Alaska Airlines to continue to provide Essential Air Service to Southeast 

Alaska. Alaska Airlines has been a dedicated friend and family member to our community, 

providing a vital economic staple to Southeast Alaska. 

On Behalf of the Petersburg Borough Assembly and Residents, 

~~ Mark Jensen 

Mayor 

Borough Administration 

PO Box 329, Petersburg, AK 99833 - Phone (907} 772-4S19 Fax (907)772-3759 

www.ci.petersburg.ak.us
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34020]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 68248]]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Integrated BioControl Systems, Inc., an exclusive license to Serial No. 
08/863,261, filed May 27, 1997, entitled ``Synthetic Diet for Rearing 
the Ectopterous Parasitoid, Catolaccus grandis.'' Serial No. 08/863,261 
is a continuation of Serial No. 08/404,779. Notice of Availability for 
Serial No. 08/404,779 was published in the Federal Register on December 
14, 1997.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 1, 1998.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
Room 415, Building 005, BARC-West, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Integrated BioControl Systems, 
Inc., has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a 
license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and 
will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 
404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
sixty (60) days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.
Richard M. Parry, Jr.,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-34020 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
254 La. 843

#### Louis A. DIROSA v. William P. BOSWORTH, Jr.

No. 50096.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: William P. Bosworth, Jr., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Cofirt of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 225 So.2d 42.

Writ refused. No error of law in the judgment complained of.
#### John E. JONES and Ora Cripps Youngblood v. Wayne D. JOINER.

No. 62457.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Wayne D. Joiner, Sr., (In Proper Person), applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. Parish of Grant.

Writ denied.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7116 

To amend the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000 

to make certain technical corrections. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2020 

Mr. WALDEN (for himself and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement 

Act of 2000 to make certain technical corrections. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KLAMATH BASIN WATER SUPPLY ENHANCE4 MENT ACT OF 2000 TECHNICAL CORREC5 TIONS. 

6 Section 4(b) of the Klamath Basin Water Supply En7 hancement Act of 2000 (114 Stat. 2222; 132 Stat. 3887) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7116 IH

1 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

2 (A)— 

3 (i) by striking ‘‘Pursuant to the rec4 lamation laws and subject’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘Subject’’; and 

6 (ii) by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘is authorized to’’; and 

8 (B) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, 

9 including conservation and efficiency measures, 

10 land idling, and use of groundwater,’’ after ‘‘ad11 minister programs’’; 

12 (2) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ‘‘and’’ 

13 after the semicolon at the end; 

14 (3) by redesignating the second paragraph (4) 

15 (relating to the effect of the subsection) as para16 graph (5); and 

17 (4) in paragraph (5) (as so redesignated)— 

18 (A) by striking subparagraph (B); 

19 (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; 

20 or’’ and inserting a period; and 

21 (C) by striking ‘‘the Secretary—’’ and all 

22 that follows through ‘‘to develop’’ in subpara23 graph (A) and inserting ‘‘the Secretary to de24 velop’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Se pt e m b er 2 5, 20 07

M r. R ic har d M a ruy a

A. S. T rus t & H o ldi ngs

PP P 46 9 B ox 10 00 0

Sai pa n, M P

D ear M r. M aruy a:

T h e p urp os e of t his let t er is t o c larif y t h e res u lt s of a ris k as s es s m e nt perf or m ed by Alas k a

I ndus t ri al H y gi en e S erv ic es ( AI H S ) f or w in do w

- m o unt e d air c o nd it io nin g un it s c har ge d w it h

H C R

- 1 88 C

. T he ris k as s es s m e nt

, s u m m a riz e d in a rep ort d at ed J u ly 20 07, d es c rib ed

c alc ul at io ns f or t he oret ic al c onc ent r at io ns of H C R

- 188 C t hat m ig ht be p res ent f oll o w in g a

c o m pl et e re le as e of t he alt er nat iv e ref ri ger ant f ro m a t y pic al w i nd o w

- m ou nt ed a ir c o ndit i oni ng

unit

. T he t he or et ic al c o nc e nt rat i ons w e re t he n us ed t o ev alu at e f la m m ab ilit y c onc erns r elat ed t o

t he rel eas e of t he r ef rig era nt int o a res i de nt ial s t ru c t ure. C alc ul at io ns w er e pe rf or m ed f o r t w o

dif f er e nt ref ri ger ant c h ar ge r at es

, as prov id ed t o A I H S by A. S. T rus t & H oldi ngs

.

T h e c alc ulat ed w o rs t

- c as e c o nc e nt rat i on of H C R

- 188 C w as ap pr ox i m at ely 1 3. 7 % of t he lo w er

ex pl os iv e li m it (LE L) f or H C R

- 1 88c (d et er m in ed t o be 2. 0 % by p rev i ous pr od uc t t es t ing ). T h e

LE L of H C R

- 1 88 C

, ex pres s ed as part s p er m ill io n by v olu m e (p p m v ), w o uld be e qu iv al ent t o

20, 0 00 p p m v

. T her ef or e, 13. 7% of 2 0, 0 00 p p m v i s equ al t o 2, 7 40 p p m v

, w hic h is bel o w t he

LE L an d not c o ns id er ed t o b e an ex pl os iv e c o nc e nt rat io n. F urt he r m o re, t he w ors t

- c as e

s c ena rio c a lc ul at ion prov id ed in t h e J uly 2 00 7 ris k as s es s m e nt as s u m ed t h at 10 0% of t he

ref rig er ant w as r ele as e d int o t h e res i de nt ial s t ruc t ure. I t w as d et er m in ed t h at t his w as hig hly

unlik ely d ue t o t he l oc at i on of t h e c o m p res s o r an d ex pa ns io n v alv e w it hi n air c o nd it ion in g unit s

.

I f y ou hav e a ny q ues t io ns or r eq uir e ad dit io na l inf or m at i on r elat ed t o t his l et t er, ple as e d on ’t

hes it at e t o c ont ac t m e at y our e arl ies t c onv eni enc e by t ele ph on e at 90 7

- 33 6

- 2 44 7 or by e m ai l at

dbu rk s @ ac s al as k a. n e t

.

T h ank y ou.

Sinc ere ly

,

D arr en D

. Bu rk s

, C I H

, C S P
No. 00-6774.

#### Randle *v.*United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of *Apprendi*v. *New Jersey,*530 U. S. 466 (2000).