Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 1997 / Notices 6011

8. North Platte Project, Pathfinder ID,

Nebraska: Negotiation of contract

regarding Safety of Dams Program

modification of Lake Alice Dam No. 1.

9. Northern Cheyenne Indian

Reservation, Montana: In accordance

with section 9 of the Northern Cheyenne

Reserved Water Rights Settlement Act of

1992, the United States and the

Northern Cheyenne Indian Tribe are

proposing to contract for 30,000 acrefeet per year of stored water from

Bighorn Reservoir, Yellowtail Unit,

Lower Bighorn Division, P–SMBP,

Montana. The Tribe will pay the United

States both capital and O&M costs

associated with each acre-foot of water

the Tribe sells from this storage for M&I

purposes.

10. Mid-Dakota Rural Water System,

Inc., South Dakota: Pursuant to the

Reclamation Projects Authorization and

Adjustment Act of 1992, the Secretary of

the Interior is authorized to make grants

and loans to Mid-Dakota Rural Water

System, Inc., a nonprofit corporation for

the planning and construction of a rural

water supply system.

11. Angostura ID, Angostura Unit, P–

SMBP, South Dakota: The District’s

current contract for water service

expired on December 31, 1995. An

interim 3-year contract provides for the

District to operate and maintain the dam

and reservoir. The proposed long-term

contract would provide a continued

water supply for the District and the

District’s continued O&M of the facility.

12. Enders Dam, FrenchmanCambridge Division, Frenchman Unit,

Nebraska: Repayment contract for

proposed Safety of Dams modifications

to Enders Dam for repair of seeping

drainage features. Estimated cost of the

repairs is $632,000.

13. Cities of Loveland and Berthoud,

Colorado, Colorado-Big Thompson

Project, Colorado: Long-term contracts

for conveyance of nonproject M&I water

through Colorado-Big Thompson Project

facilities pursuant to the Town Sites and

Power Development Act of 1906.

14. P–SMBP, Kansas and Nebraska:

Initiate negotiations for renewal of longterm water supply contracts with

Kansas-Bostwick, Nebraska-Bostwick,

Frenchman Valley, and FrenchmanCambridge IDs.

15. Northwest Area Water Supply,

North Dakota: Long-term contract for

water supply from Garrison Diversion

Unit facilities.

16. Fort Shaw and Greenfields IDs,

Sun River Project, Montana: Contract for

Safety of Dams cost for repairs to

Willow Creek Dam.

17. Canyon Ferry Unit, P–SMBP,

Montana: Water service contract with

Montana Tunnels Mining, Inc., expires

June 1997. Working with area office to

develop criteria for NEPA compliance

and basis of negotiation. Renewal of

existing contract for an additional 5

years.

18. P–SMBP, Kansas: Water service

contracts with the Kirwin and Webster

IDs in the Solomon River Basin in

Kansas will be extended for a period of

4 years in accordance with Pub. L. 104–

326 enacted October 19, 1996.

19. P–SMBP, Nebraska: Water service

contracts with the Loup Basin

Reclamation District for the Sargent and

Farwell IDs in the Middle Loup River

Basin in Nebraska will be extended for

a period of 4 years in accordance with

Public Law 104–326 enacted October

19, 1996.

20. City of Cheyenne, Kendrick

Project, Wyoming: Negotiation of

contract to renew for an additional term

of 5 years. Contract for up to 10,000 acre

feet of storage space for replacement

water on a yearly basis in Seminoe

Reservoir.

21. Highland-Hanover ID, P–SMBP,

Hanover-Bluff Unit, Wyoming:

Renegotiation of long-term water service

contract; includes provisions for

repayment of construction costs.

22. Upper Bluff ID, P–SMBP,

Hanover-Bluff Unit, Wyoming:

Renegotiation of long-term water service

contract; includes provisions for

repayment of construction costs.

23. Fort Clark ID, P–SMBP, North

Dakota: Negotiate an interim water

service contract to continue delivery of

project water pending renewal of a longterm water service-repayment contract.

24. Canadian River Project, Texas:

Recalculate existing contract repayment

schedule to conform with the provisions

of the Emergency Drought Relief Act of

1996. The revised schedule is to reflect

a consideration for project land

transferred to the National Park Service,

and a 3-year deferment of payments.

25. Nueces River Project, Texas:

Recalculate existing contract repayment

schedule to conform with the provisions

of the Emergency Drought Relief Act of

1996. The revised schedule is to reflect

a 5-year deferment of payments.

26. Western Heart River ID, P–SMBP,

Heart Butte Unit, North Dakota:

Negotiation of water service contract to

continue delivery of project water the

District.

Dated: January 31, 1997.

J. Austin Burke,

Director, Program Analysis Office.

[FR Doc. 97–3142 Filed 2–7–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310–94–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Community Oriented Policing

Services; Agency Information

Collection Activities: Proposed

Collection; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice of information collection

under review; making officer

redeployment effective progress reports.

Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) approval is being sought for the

information collection listed below.

This proposed information collection

was previously published in the Federal

Register and Allowed 60 days for public

comment.

The purpose of this notice is to allow

an additional 30 days for public

comments until March 12, 1997. This

process is conducted in accordance with

5 CFR Part 1320.10. Written comments

and/or suggestions regarding the item(s)

contained in this notice, especially

regarding the estimated public burden

and associated response time, should be

directed to the Office of Management

and Budget, Office of Information and

Regulatory Affairs, Attention:

Department of Justice Desk Officer,

Washington, DC, 20530.

Additionally, comments may be

submitted to OMB via facsimile to 202–

396–7285. Comments may also be

submitted to the Department of Justice

(DOJ), Justice Management Division,

Information Management and Security

Staff, Attention: Department Clearance

Officer, Suite 850, 1001 G Street, NW,

Washington, DC, 20530. Additionally,

comments may be submitted to DOJ via

facsimile to 202–514–1534. Written

comments and suggestions from the

public and affected agencies should

address one or more of the following

points:

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency/component,

including whether the information will

have practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the

agencies/components estimate of the

burden of the proposed collection of

information, including the validity of

the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.
6012 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 27 / Monday, February 10, 1997 / Notices

Overview of This Information

Collection

(1) Type of information collection.

New collection.

(2) The title of the form/collection.

Making Officer Redeployment Effective

(MORE) Progress Report.

(3) The agency form number, if any,

and the applicable component of the

Department sponsoring the collection.

Form: 017/01. Office of Community

Oriented Policing Services, United

States Department of Justice.

(4) Affected public who will asked or

required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract. Primary: State, Local or Tribal

Governments. Other: None.

(5) An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond. 1,600 respondents at 2 hours

per response. The information will be

collected twice per year from each

respondent. Thus, there will be

approximately 3,200 total yearly

responses at 2 hours per response.

(6) An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection. 6,400 annual burden hours

Public comment on this proposed

information collection is strongly

encouraged.

Dated: February 4, 1997.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 97–3154 Filed 2–7–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–21–M

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National

Cooperative Research and Production

Act of 1993—Portland Cement

Association

Notice is hereby given that, on

January 17, 1997, pursuant to Section

6(a) of the National Cooperative

Research and Production Act of 1993,

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the

Portland Cement Association (‘‘PCA’’)

filed written notifications

simultaneously with the Attorney

General and the Federal Trade

Commission disclosing a change in

membership. The notifications were

filed for the purpose of extending the

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages

under specified circumstances.

Specifically, RMC Lonestar, Pleasanton,

CA has become a member of PCA.

No other changes have been made in

either the membership or planned

activity of PCA.

On January 7, 1985, PCA filed its

original notification pursuant to Section

6(a) of the Act. The Department of

Justice published a notice in the Federal

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the

Act on February 5, 1985 (50 FR 5015).

The last notification was filed with the

Department on August 16, 1996. A

notice was published in the Federal

Register on September 12, 1996 (61 FR

48169).

Constance K. Robinson,

Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 97–3143 Filed 2–7–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M

Drug Enforcement Administration

Agency Information Collection

Activities: New Collection; Comment

Request

ACTION: Notice of information collection

under review; Report of mail order

transactions.

The proposed information collection

is published to obtain comments from

the public and affected agencies.

Comments are encouraged and will be

accepted until April 11, 1997.

We are requesting written comments

and suggestions from the public and

affected agencies concerning the

proposed collection of information.

Your comments should address one or

more of the following four points:

1. Evaluate whether the proposed

collection of information is necessary

for the proper performance of the

functions of the agency, including

whether the information will have

practical utility;

2. Evaluate the accuracy of the

agencies estimate of the burden of the

proposed collection of information,

including the validity of the

methodology and assumptions used;

3. Enhance the quality, utility, and

clarity of the information to be

collected; and

4. Minimize the burden of the

collection of information on those who

are to respond, including through the

use of appropriate automated,

electronic, mechanical, or other

technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology,

e.g., permitting electronic submission of

responses.

Coments and/or suggestions regarding

the item(s) contained in this notice,

especially regarding the estimated

public burden and associated response

time should be directed to Mr. James A.

Pacella, 202–307–7297, Chief, Policy

Unit, Liaison & Policy Section, Office of

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement

Administration Washington, DC 20537.

If you have additional comments,

suggestions, or need a copy of the

proposed information collection

instrument with instructions, or

additional information, please contact

Mr. James A. Pacella.

Additionally, comments may also be

submitted to the Department of Justice

(DOJ), Justice Management Division,

Information Management and Security

Staff, Attention: Department Clearance

Officer, Suite 850, Washington Center,

1001 G Street, NW, Washington, DC

20530. Additional comments may be

submitted to DOJ via facsimile at 202–

514–1590. Overview of this information

collection:

1. Type of Information Collection:

New Collection.

2. Title of the Form/Collection: Report

of Mail Order Transactions.

3. Agency form number: None;

Applicable component of the

Department of Justice sponsoring the

collection: Office of Diversion Control,

Drug Enforcement Administration,

Department of Justice.

4. Affected public who will be asked

or required to respond, as well as a brief

abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit. Other: None.

The Comprehensive

Methamphetamine Control Act of 1996

(Pub. L. 104–237) requires that each

regulated person who engages in a

transaction with a non-regulated person

which involves ephedrine,

pseudoephedrine or

phenylpropanolamine and uses the

Postal Service or any private or

commercial carrier shall, on a monthly

basis, submit a report of each such

transaction, conducted during the

previous month to the Attorney General.

5. An estimate of the total number of

respondents and the amount of time

estimated for an average respondent to

respond: 1,500 respondents at 6 times

per year at 1 hour per response.

6. An estimate of the total public

burden (in hours) associated with the

collection: 9,000 annual burden hours.

Public comment on this proposed

information collection is strongly

encouraged.

Dated: February 4, 1997.

Robert B. Briggs,

Department Clearance Officer, United States

Department of Justice.

[FR Doc. 97–3155 Filed 2–7–97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410–18–M

[DEA #153C]

Controlled Substances: Established

Initial 1997 Aggregate Production

Quotas: Corrections

AGENCY: Drug Enforcement

Administration (DEA), Justice.