alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fred R. GANGELHOFF, Appellant, v. LOKEY MOTORS COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 72-87.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 8, 1972.

Leon Whitehurst, Jr., Clearwater, for appellant.

Howard H. Whittington of Wolfe, Bonner & Hogan, Clearwater, for appellee.

LILES, Judge.

Appellant brought suit against Lokey Motors Company, Inc., a Florida corporation, and alleged among other things that Lokey Motors had instituted criminal proceedings against him without probable cause and with malice.

The trial court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for the reason that the element of malice was not sufficiently pleaded. Appellant assigns as error the court’s dismissal of his amended complaint. We reverse.

*59The complaint alleged among other things the following: The prosecution, by the Defendant against the Plaintiff, was without probable cause and was commenced and continued by said Defendant from malice towards Plaintiff; that certain acts were committed by the defendant and these actions were taken with actual malice.

We believe Rule 1.120(b), R.C.P. 30 F.S.A., correctly recites what must be pleaded in order to constitute a cause of action. The rule says:

> “ . . . Malice, intent, knowledge, mental attitude and other condition of mind . . . may be averred *generally”*(Emphasis added.)

Appellant recites in his brief that this rule has never been construed in Florida; but directs this court’s attention to the application of the Federal rule which is identical to our Florida rule. We have the authority under Delta Rent-A-Car v. Rihl, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 467, to decide this case pursuant to the case law enunciated in the Federal decisions. We rely on Belli v. Orlando Daily Newspapers, Inc., 5 Cir., 1967, 389 F.2d 579, and Seaboard Oil Co. v. Cunningham, 5 Cir. 1931, 51 F.2d 321.

The plaintiff may have difficulty in proving malice toward him by the defendant but he has made sufficient averments to afford him the opportunity.

Reversed and remanded for action consistent with this opinion.

PIERCE, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
#### Hershell Gerald GUARNETT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 40575.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 9, 1971.

Certiorari denied. 240 So.2d 834.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Hugoton Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 
  
Simmons Bank,

Trustee for Hugoton RoyaltyTrust
March 30, 2023  By /S/ TOD MILLER   Tod Miller   Regional President Trust Division**
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. R. D. FOSTER, Relator, v. Honorable W. Troy HALL, Jr., as Judge of the Circuit Court for the Fifth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida in and for Lake County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 69-591.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Jan. 21, 1970.

W. H. Carmine, Jr., Lakeland, for relator.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Morton J. Hanlon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for respondent.

McNULTY, Judge.

The relator suggests prohibition to prevent the trial court from proceeding in a ^prosecution against him for violation of one of the offenses outlined under § 932.29, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. During the course of an investigation of the offense involved the state attorney subpoenaed and interrogated the relator and subsequently caused criminal charges to be brought against him. We ordered issuance of the rule because it initially appeared that the relator’s point was well taken. It now appears that the rule should be discharged for the reason that the full record reveals no semblance of the essential element of *compulsion*which is required to afford immunity under the aforesaid § 932.291*.*

The gravamen of the statute is to provide an investigatory weapon to law enforcement which they are not obligated to utilize. In this case, the prosecution chose not to use it and fully informed the defendant of his right to silence and that anything he said could be used against him. *723Further, the situation was not one involving in-custody interrogation governed by Miranda v. Arizona,2 and the defendant’s submission to interrogation appears to have been otherwise voluntary.

The mere fact that the defendant was under subpoena to appear is immaterial. Compulsory attendance is one thing and compulsory testimony is quite another. The compulsion required to bring into play the immunity provisions of the foregoing statute relates solely to compulsory testimony.3 As pointed out above, it is totally lacking in the record of this case.

Rule discharged and suggestion dismissed.

LILES, A. C. J., concurs.

PIERCE, J., dissents.

1

. State ex rel. Raines v. Grayson (Fla.1951), 55 So.2d 554; McKown v. State (Fla.1951), 54 So.2d 54; and State ex rel. Johnson v. MacMillan (Fla.App.2d 1967), 194 So.2d 627.

2

. (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

3

. See cases in n. 1, *supra.*
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65737]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32603]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), in accordance with Public 
Law 103-446, gives notice that a meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
Minority Veterans will be held from Monday, January 12 through 
Wednesday, January 14, 1998, in Washington, DC. The purpose of the 
Advisory Committee on Minority Veterans is to advise the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs on the administration of VA benefits and services for 
minority veterans, to assess the needs of minority veterans and to 
evaluate whether VA compensation, medical and rehabilitation services, 
outreach, and other programs are meeting those needs. The Committee 
will make recommendations to the Secretary regarding such activities.
    The meeting will convene in room 230, VA Central Office (VACO) 
Building, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, from 8:30 A.M. to 
5:00 P.M. on Monday, January 12, the Committee will receive an 
orientation on its duties and responsibilities. On Tuesday, January 13, 
the Committee will review the implementation plan for the 63 
recommendations contained in its third Annual Report. The Committee 
will also finalize plans for each subcommittee and set the agenda for 
the coming year. On Wednesday, January 14, the Subcommittees will 
examine issues germane to their assigned areas of responsibility. These 
sessions will be open to the public. It will be necessary for those 
wishing to attend to contact Mrs. Crystal Lawrence-Greenwell, 
Department of Veterans Affairs (phone (202) 273-6708) prior to January 
5, 1998. No time will be allocated for the purpose of receiving oral 
presentations from the public. However, the Committee will accept 
appropriate written comments from interested parties on issues 
affecting minority veterans. Such comments should be referred to the 
Committee at the following address: Advisory Committee on Minority 
Veterans, Center for Minority Veterans (00M), U.S. Department of 
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: December 5, 1997.

    By direction of the Acting Secretary.
Heyward Bannister,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-32603 Filed 12-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 8 OF 
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          15,606
<SECURITIES>                                     2,216
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                       480
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,105
<PP&E>                                           8,242
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,077
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,091
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,077
<SALES>                                         23,246
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,172
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,235
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,937
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
#### William Lee CARLTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 30, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

The Honorable Randy C. Huffman, Secretary West Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Protection Division ofAir Quality 601 57th Street SE Charleston, West Virginia 24304-2943 Dear Secretary Huffman:

### ~JUN

# t32013

OnMay 1, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the West Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the West Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Protection. The SIP revision pertains to the Regional Haze 5-Year Periodic Report covering 2008 -2013. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Jacqueline Lewis, at (215) 814-2037. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: John Benedict WVDEP Sincerely,

Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

Customer ServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474 

## (
```
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 80]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34188]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Freight Forwarder License Applicants

    Notice is hereby given that the following applicants have filed 
with the Federal Maritime Commission applications for licenses as ocean 
freight forwarders pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 
(46 U.S.C. app. 1781 and 46 CFR 510).
    Persons knowing of any reason why any of the following applicants 
should not receive a license are requested to contact the Office of 
Freight Forwarders, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. 
20573.

Marianas Steamship Agencies, Inc., 1026 Cabras Highway, Administration 
Building Annex, Piti, Guam 96925.
    Junichi Kinoshita, President
    Clarence Tenorio, Vice President
Impex Cargo, Inc., 7661 NW 68 Street, Miami, FL 33166.
Officers:
    Zamir Nader, President
    Martha Claudia Garcia, Vice President

    Dated: December 29, 1997.
Ronald D. Murphy,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34188 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-M
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                            136,131
<SECURITIES>                   41,858,891
<RECEIVABLES>                     167,412
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                        25,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               42,841,251
<PP&E>                          1,115,096
<DEPRECIATION>                    746,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 43,242,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           8,038,908
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                           53,097
<OTHER-SE>                     35,150,160
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   43,242,160
<SALES>                            94,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  825,525
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     150,729
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  720,804
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                179,510
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (225,518)
<INCOME-TAX>                       14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (236,455)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (236,455)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.5)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.5)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1)
The report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The
  information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
  of and for the period covered by the Report.  /s/ Joseph
  Feldschuh, M.D.Joseph
  Feldschuh, M.D.President
  and Chief Executive OfficerMay 19, 2006
null

2016-10-05

425.21628

eng - Argued: 2016-10-05. Docket number: Case: 16-1184
#### DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED NATIONAL CORP., a corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-819.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 13, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 3rd QUARTER 2012

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 6/28 7/2 7/5 26.00 29.00 28.00 88.00 -5.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 7/5 7/9 7/12 26.00 30.00 28.00 86.00 -2.00

7/12 7/16 7/19 28.00 30.00 28.00 83.00 3.00

7/19 7/23 7/26 30.00 30.00 28.00 25.00 103.00 10.00

7/26 7/30 8/2 30.00 30.00 28.00 85.00 3.00

8/2 8/6 8/9 30.00 30.00 28.00 87.00 1.00

8/9 8/13 8/16 30.00 30.00 28.00 89.00 -1.00

8/16 8/20 8/23 30.00 30.00 28.00 25.00 116.00 -3.00

8/23 8/27 8/30 30.00 30.00 28.00 91.00 -3.00

8/30 9/4 9/6 30.00 30.00 28.00 91.00 -3.00

9/6 9/10 9/13 30.00 30.00 28.00 90.00 -2.00

9/13 9/17 9/20 30.00 30.00 28.00 25.00 115.00 -2.00

9/20 9/24 9/27 30.00 30.00 28.00 88.00 0.00

1208.00 1212.00 -4.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

35-DAY BILL 8/27 8/30 30.00 30.00

Matures 10/4

CMB Funds: 30.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

IN SIZE

3-year Note 7/5 7/10 7/16 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 7/5 7/11 7/16 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 7/5 7/12 7/16 13.00 0.00 35.59 30.41

10-year TIPS 7/12 7/19 7/31 15.00 0.00 25.13

2-year Note 7/19 7/24 7/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 7/19 7/25 7/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 7/19 7/26 7/31 29.00 0.00 53.47 35.40

3-year Note 8/1 8/7 8/15 32.00 0.00

10-year Note 8/1 8/8 8/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 8/1 8/9 8/15 16.00 0.00 52.28 19.72

5-year TIPS ® 8/9 8/16 8/31 14.00 2.00

2-year Note 8/16 8/21 8/31 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 8/16 8/22 8/31 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 8/16 8/23 8/31 29.00 0.00 49.38 63.62

3-year Note 9/6 9/11 9/17 32.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 9/6 9/12 9/17 21.00 0.00

30-year Note ® 9/6 9/13 9/17 13.00 0.00 38.08 27.92

10-year TIPS ® 9/13 9/20 9/28 13.00 0.00

2-year Note 9/20 9/25 10/1 35.00 0.00

5-year Note 9/20 9/26 10/1 35.00 0.00

7-year Note 9/20 9/27 10/1 29.00 0.00 50.15 61.85

543.00 304.08 238.92

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 265
Exhibit 12





AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Unaudited)







|                                                   | Three Months Ended     |          | Nine Months Ended
|-------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | -------- | -----------------
|                                                   | September 30,          |          | September 30,    
|                                                   | 2005                   | 2004     |                  
|                                                   | (dollars in thousands)
|Earnings:
Income before provision for income taxes | $167,855               | $179,111 |                  
|Interest expense                                   | 233,653                | 164,844  |                  
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 4,800                  | 4,673    |                  
|Total earnings                                     | $406,308               | $348,628 |                  
|Fixed charges:
Interest expense                    | $233,653               | $164,844 |                  
|Implicit interest in rents                         | 4,800                  | 4,673    |                  
|Total fixed charges                                | $238,453               | $169,517 |                  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 | 1.70                   | 2.06     |                  



34
Exhibit 31.02

                                   Certification

I, Pam Kandaris-Cha, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Uintah Mountain
Copper Company

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors ( or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls'
and

Date: May 3, 2003

By:       /s/
   --------------------------------
   Pam Kandaris-Cha
   (Chief Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be
retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.