alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67054]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33629]



[[Page 67054]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, January 23, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, D.C., 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-33629 Filed 12-19-97; 2:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33551]



[[Page 67416]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 030-31373-CivP; ASLBP No. 98-735-01-CivP; EA 97-207]


Atomic Safety and Licensing Board; In the Matter of Conam 
Inspection, Inc., Itasca, Illinois (License No. 12-16559-01), Order 
Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty; Notice of Hearing

December 18, 1997.
    Notice is hereby given that, by Memorandum and Order (Granting 
Request for Hearing and Scheduling Prehearing Conference), dated 
December 17, 1997, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board has granted 
the request of Conam Inspection, Inc. (Conam or Licensee), for a 
hearing in the above-titled proceeding. The hearing concerns the Order 
Imposing a Civil Monetary Penalty in the amount of $16,000, issued by 
the NRC Staff on November 5, 1997 (published at 62 FR 60923 (November 
13, 1997)). The parties to the proceeding are Conam and the NRC Staff. 
The issues to be considered at the hearing are (a) whether the Licensee 
was in violation of the Commission's requirements as set forth in 
Violations I.B and I.C of the Notice of Violation and Proposed 
Imposition of Civil Penalty (NOV), dated June 9, 1997; and (b) whether, 
on the basis of such violations and the additional violations set forth 
in the NOV that the Licensee admitted, the Order Imposing a Civil 
Monetary Penalty should be sustained.
    Materials concerning this proceeding are on file at the 
Commission's Public Document Room, 2120 L St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 
20555, and at the Commission's Region III Office, 801 Warrenville Road, 
Lisle, Illinois 60532-4351.
    During the course of this proceeding, the Licensing Board, as 
necessary, will conduct one or more prehearing conferences and 
evidentiary hearing sessions. The time and place of these sessions will 
be announced in Licensing Board Orders. The first prehearing conference 
is scheduled for January 14, 1998, and is to be conducted through a 
telephone conference call. Except for conferences conducted by 
telephone conference calls (which are in any event to be transcribed), 
members of the public are invited to attend any such sessions.

    Dated: December 18, 1997 at Rockville, Maryland.

    For the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.
Charles Bechhoefer,
0Chairman Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. 97-33551 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
**Exhibit32**

 

THE DAYTON POWERAND LIGHT COMPANY

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officersof The Dayton Power and Light Company (the “Issuer”) hereby certify that theIssuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004,which this certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer andwill be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
|  /s/ James V. Mahoney          |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
|  James V. Mahoney              |
|                                |
|                                |
|  /s/ Pamela Holdren            |   |
|  Pamela Holdren                |
|                                |
|                                |
|  Date:   November 5, 2004 |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.01





Section 1350Certification








In
connection with this annual report of Futures Portfolio Fund Limited Partnership
(the
“Company”)on
Form 10-K for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(this “Report”) I,
Kenneth E. Steben,President of the General
Partner of the Companycertify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.  This
Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the
Company.





Date:
March 28, 2008








/s/ Kenneth E.
Steben


By:


Kenneth
E. Steben


President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director of the General Partner


(Principal
Executive Officer)






62
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Norris J. FANGUY, Jr.

No. 62281.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Norris J. Fanguy, Jr., applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Lafourche.

Denied.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Quarterly Report of DATATAB INC. (the
           "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed
           with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
           "Report"), I, Yitzhak N. Bachana, Chief Financial Officer of the,
           Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
           906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

                (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                         of 1934; and

                (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                         presents, in all material respects, the financial
                         condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               By:   /s/ Yitzhak N. Bachana
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Yitzhak N. Bachana
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     Date: August 14, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 19, 2015

No. 04-15-00146-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.W.B.-L.ET AL,

Appellant

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-PA-02179

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the order terminating Appellant Candelario Hernandez’s 

parental rights to his children, Appellant’s brief was due on May 12, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a). To date, Appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time to file the 

brief.

We ORDER Appellant to show cause in writing within TEN DAYS from the date of this 

order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a). If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for 

an abandonment hearing. Cf. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2); Samaniego v. State, 952 S.W.2d 50, 

52–53 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-60098

Summary Calendar

ISMAEL MAHDI OMAR, also known as Ismael Omar,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petitions for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A088 739 922

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ismael Mahdi Omar, a native and citizen of Djibouti, Africa, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal from

the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding

of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). He also

petitions for review of the BIA’s denial of his motion for reconsideration. 

Omar makes only conclusional arguments that his removal was barred by

the principle of res judicata and that he was prejudiced during his removal

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 21, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-60098 Document: 00512092451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/21/2012
No. 12-60098

proceedings because documentary evidence he submitted in support of his claims

was either not submitted to the IJ or not considered by the IJ. Omar does not

address the BIA’s reasons for rejecting his res judicata argument or its finding

that he had a full and fair opportunity to present his claims and that the

immigration proceedings were not unfair. In addition, he fails to address the

BIA’s findings with respect to his requests for asylum, withholding of removal

and protection under CAT.

Omar’s petitions for review do not provide “even the slightestidentification

of any error” in the BIA’s legal analyses or the application of the analyses to his

claims. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748

(5th Cir. 1987); Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). Issues

not raised and conclusional and inadequately briefed arguments are waived. 

Chambers v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 445, 448 n.1 (5th Cir. 2008); Soadjede, 324 F.3d

at 833; Rodriguez v. INS, 9 F.3d 408, 414 n.15 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly,

Omar’s petitions for review are DENIED.

2

 Case: 12-60098 Document: 00512092451 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/21/2012
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, John T. Mallett, certify that:
     1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ML Life InsuranceCompany of New York;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Dated: March 27, 2008      /s/ JOHN T. MALLETT
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          3,634,757
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                                  0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  600,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                        0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     4,814,098
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            487,584
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              490,310
<LOANS>                                        26,703,817
<ALLOWANCE>                                       181,951
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,879,034
<DEPOSITS>                                     33,447,444
<SHORT-TERM>                                            0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               243,697
<LONG-TERM>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          625,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,610,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 36,879,034
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 2,200,281
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 343,465
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   51,780
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                2,595,526
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,189,450
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,189,450
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           1,406,076
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      12,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                      0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   905,009
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   609,012
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        609,012
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      419,519
<EPS-BASIC>                                        6.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        6.71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       4.53
<LOANS-NON>                                        79,643
<LOANS-PAST>                                            0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    2,965
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  179,247
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      13,451
<RECOVERIES>                                        4,155
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 181,951
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              181,951
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           136,581



</TABLE>
#### Charles H. MARKEL, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURE, Respondent.

No. 71-310.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 22, 1972.

Supplemental Opinion Feb. 21, 1973.

Horton, Schwartz & Perse, Miami, Butler, Swope & Manning, Miami Shores, for petitioner.

Marks, Gray, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, Goldin & Turner, Gainesville, for respondent.

Before BARKDULL, C. *}.,*and PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ.

*13ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on September 7, 1971 (253 So.2d 914), by certiorari, the order of the Florida State Board of Architecture in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by appeal, the Supreme Court of Florida, 268 So.2d 374, by its opinion and judgment filed November 1, 1972 and mandate now lodged in this court, remanded the cause to this court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida;

Now, Therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court issued in this cause on November 23, 1971 is withdrawn, the judgment of this court filed September 7, 1971, insofar as it is in conflict with the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida, is vacated and the issue as to the abuse of discretion by the Florida State Board of Architecture in this case in ordering the appellant’s license revoked rather than suepended for a brief period or directing a reprimand is set for oral argument before this court on Monday, January 29, 1973 at 9:00 o’clock A.M. Counsel for each side will be allowed 15 minutes for oral argument on the limited issue as directed by the Supreme Court of Florida. The petitioner may file a brief within 10 days from this date if he so desires on this issue, and the respondent may file, within 10 days after service of petitioner’s brief, a reply thereto if he desires.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Upon appeal from our order denying cer-tiorari, Markel v. Florida State Board of Architecture, Fla.App.1971, 253 So.2d 914, the Supreme Court of Florida remanded the cause to us, Markel v. Florida State Board of Architecture, Fla.1972, 268 So.2d 374, with directions to modify the sentence of the Board. Accordingly, the writ of cer-tiorari is granted and sentence is modified to read as follows: The certificate of registration of Charles H. Markel as a practicing architect in the State of Florida is suspended for 60 days from the date of the service of copy of this order.

In all other particulars, the order of the Florida State Board of Architecture shall remain in full force and effect.

It is so ordered.
ip-20131231exhibit1062014execmip


Exhibit 10.6


PARTICIPANTS AS OF JANUARY 1, 2014
UNDER THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
	
		
	John V. Faraci
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	C. Cato Ealy
	SVP, Corporate Development

	William P. Hoel
	SVP, Container the Americas

	Tommy S. Joseph
	SVP, Manufacturing, Technology, EHS&S and Global Sourcing

	Thomas G. Kadien
	SVP, Consumer Packaging and IP Asia

	Paul J. Karre
	SVP, Human Resources and Communications

	Mary A. Laschinger
	SVP and President, xpedx

	Tim S. Nicholls
	SVP, Printing & Communications Papers the Americas

	Jean-Michel Ribieras
	SVP and President, IP Europe, Middle East, Africa and Russia

	Carol L. Roberts
	SVP and Chief Financial Officer

	Sharon R. Ryan
	SVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

	Mark S. Sutton
	SVP, Industrial Packaging

	





Any other individual elected to the position of Senior Vice President during 2014













Exhibit 10.6


EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
2014 COMPANY BUSINESS OBJECTIVE 
AND INTERMEDIATE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 


	
		
	

Plan Element
	

162(m) Limit Approved by MDCC



	Company Business Objective:
	Positive EBITDA Before Special Items

	

INTERMEDIATE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES:
	

SAME AS 2014 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN OBJECTIVES
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Dale R. Black, Chief Financial Officer of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: June 16, 2011

/s/ DALE R. BLACK Dale R. Black Chief Financial Officer


1

---



QuickLinks