### 65195 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 212 / Monday, November 3, 2014 / Notices

GreenGov Symposium. Potential cosponsors could include, but are not limited to, registered 501(c)3 organizations and academic institutions. Eligible entities, including consortia ofeligible entities, interested in cosponsoring the 2015 GreenGov Symposium effort should demonstrate and provide relevant information on:

• Alignment of their organization’s mission and goals with the mission and goals of the Council on Environmental Quality and the Office of the Federal Environmental Executive and with the general purpose of the Symposium;

• ability to contribute to selection of Symposium location(s), associated logistics, agenda planning, speaker proposal and selection, and event outreach;

• experience working successfully with private sector, state and local government and academic sector stakeholders that would attend a GreenGov event;

• ability to travel to various locations within the continental United States, if necessary to host GreenGov events;

• technical and programmatic ability to support Internet and Web-based production of GreenGov educational events; and

• ability to support both major multiple day symposium event as well as limited topic specific seminars and workshops. Background

GreenGov is a Council on Environmental Quality initiative focused on Federal energy and sustainability efforts. Past GreenGov Symposiums brought sustainability leaders and newcomers in the Federal, state, and local government, academic, non-profit and private sectors together to learn from each other, share ideas, and help develop innovative solutions to energy and sustainability challenges in Federal operations. By design, the GreenGov Symposium helps the Federal community save energy, save money, and address sustainability goals and targets under Executive Order 13514, ‘‘Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance.’’ Historical information on GreenGov is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov//greengov.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4342, 4344.
Dated: October 29, 2014. Kate E. Brandt,
Federal Environmental Executive.
[FR Doc. 2014–26046 Filed 10–31–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3225–F5–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE** 

**Defense Acquisition Regulations System** 

**[Docket Number DARS–2014–0037]**

**Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request** 

**AGENCY :**  Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Defense Acquisition Regulations System has submitted to OMB for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).

**DATES :**  Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 3,
2014.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Part 239, Acquisition of Information Technology, and the associated clauses at 252.239–7000 and 252.239–7006; OMB Control Number 0704–0341.

Type of Request: Extension. Number of Respondents: 387. Responses per Respondent: 33. Annual Responses: 12,915. Average Burden per Response: approximately 0.6 hour.

Annual Burden Hours: 7,106. Needs and Uses: This requirement provides for the collection of information from contractors regarding security of information technology; tariffs pertaining to telecommunications services; and proposals from common carriers to perform special construction under contracts for telecommunications services. Contracting officers and other DoD personnel use the information to ensure that information systems are protected; to participate in the establishment of tariffs for telecommunications services; and to establish reasonable prices for special construction by common carriers.

Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit entities and not-for-profit institutions.

Frequency: On occasion. OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.

Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method:

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number, and title for the Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other public submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check http://www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).

DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Frederick C. Licari.

Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. Licari at: Publication Collections Program, WHS/ESD Information Management Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 2nd Floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA
22350–3100.

Manuel Quinones, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2014–26029 Filed 10–31–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 5001–06–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Department of the Navy**

**[Docket ID: USN–2014–0022]**

**Proposed Collection; Comment Request** 

**AGENCY :**  Navy Exchange Service Command (NEXCOM), DON, DoD.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Navy Exchange Service Command (NEXCOM) announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; (c) ways to