alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63-64]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP90-1512-001]


Mountain Fuel Supply Company; Notice of Petition To Amend

December 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 19, 1997, Mountain Fuel Supply Company 
(Mountain Fuel), 180 East First South Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 
84145, filed in Docket No. CP90-1512-001 a petition pursuant to Section 
7(f) of the Natural Gas Act to amend its certificate issued in Docket 
No. CP90-1512, authorizing a service area determination, all as more 
fully set forth in the petition on file with the Commission and open to 
public inspection.
    Mountain Fuel proposes to modify its service area by adding Box 
Elder, Weber Davis, Salt Lake, Tooele and Utah Counties, all located in 
Utah, and the remainder of Cache County, Utah, that is not part of 
Mountain Fuel's existing service area. It is stated that the service 
area presently consists of Franklin County, Idaho, and most of Cache 
County, Utah. It is explained that the additional counties are located 
along the Wasatch Front of northern Utah and incorporate the Sunset, 
Porter's Lane (Centerville), Little Mountain and Payson gate-station 
interconnects with Questar Pipeline Company (Questar), an interstate 
pipeline company, and the Hunter Park interconnect with Kern River Gas 
Transmission Company, an interstate pipeline company.
    Mountain Fuel asserts that the additions to the service area are 
required to improve its operating flexibility for meeting customer 
requirements in its northern Utah and

[[Page 64]]

southern Idaho distribution area. It is stated that Mountain Fuel has 
recently experienced operational problems because of declines in the 
Btu content of gas received from Questar at its Hyrum Gate Station, 
which has been the only source of gas serving customers in the existing 
service area. It is explained that Mountain Fuel requires additional 
supply sources for gas with higher Btu content to provide reliable 
service to its customers.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
reference to said petition to amend should on or before January 5, 
1998, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, 
D.C. 20426, a motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the 
requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.10). All protests filed with the Commission will be 
considered by it in determining the appropriate action to be taken but 
will not serve to make the Protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or to participate as a 
party in any hearing therein must file a motion to intervene in 
accordance with the Commission's Rules.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34173 Filed 12-31-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,210,910
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                        1,230,015
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                          1,313,382
<EQUITIES>                                     464,126
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,921,782
<CASH>                                          70,737
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             402,165
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                          64,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,834,980
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              2,918,782
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            366,640
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,363
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,321,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,834,980
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,259,251
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            207,646
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              32,939
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 (1,370)
<BENEFITS>                                     933,015
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    (6,052)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           336,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                234,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                    49,226
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            185,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.34
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               2,383,528
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            947,578
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                             (14,563)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             244,180
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               549,635
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              2,522,728
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         14,563


</TABLE>
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHANNON KING, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. No. 10-17929D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01425-JCMLRL
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 17, 2012 San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER, O’SCANNLAIN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Shannon King appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her mortgagee, GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC”). The district court did not err in granting GMAC summary judgment on any of King’s claims: As King had fallen behind on her mortgage payments, she is 

# FILED
APR 23 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 unable to make a claim for misrepresentation, promissory estoppel, or wrongful foreclosure. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nev. Bell , 825 P.2d 588, 592 (Nev. 1992) (per curiam); Pink v. Busch , 691 P.2d 456, 459 (Nev. 1984) (per curiam); Collins v. Union Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 662 P.2d 610, 623 (Nev. 1983). King’s breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of frauds. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.210(1). And King is unable to make a claim for unjust enrichment since there was a valid mortgage agreement between the parties. Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks Trust , 942 P.2d 182, 187 (Nev. 1997) (per curiam). King’s remaining contentions are either waived or without merit.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code, each of the undersigned officers of Rio Tinto plc, registered in England and Wales (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2014 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                 |  |                    |  |        |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Sam Walsh      |  |                 |  | /s/ Chris Lynch   
|Name:              |  | Sam Walsh       |  |                    |  | Name:  |  | Chris Lynch            
|Title:             |  | Chief executive |  |                    |  | Title: |  | Chief financial officer
|                   |  |                
|Date: 5 March 2015 |  |                 |  | Date: 5 March 2015

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by
reference in any filing under the Securities Act.



---

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act, each of the undersigned officers of Rio Tinto Limited, registered in Victoria, Australia, (the
Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2014
(the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



/s/ Sam Walsh



/s/ Chris LynchName:

Sam Walsh



Name:

Chris LynchTitle:

Chief executive



Title:

Chief financial officerDate: 5 March 2015



Date: 5 March 2015


The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated
by reference with any filing under the Securities Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          21,941
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,157
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    216,460
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         146,890
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           145,122
<LOANS>                                      1,387,831
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,824,840
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,528,456
<SHORT-TERM>                                   113,219
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,080
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           110
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,225
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,824,840
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 99,017
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,141
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               116,158
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              59,508
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              61,808
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           54,350
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,110
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 33,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,952
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,952
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,535
<EPS-BASIC>                                     126.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   124.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                      3,003
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,514
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   268
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,657
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  (1,090)
<RECOVERIES>                                       136
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,813
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,813
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,539


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          13,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                       475
<INVENTORY>                                     38,183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,597
<PP&E>                                          85,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,153
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,486
<BONDS>                                         63,952
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,153
<SALES>                                        126,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,394
<CGS>                                           93,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   93,338
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,440
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,818
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,622
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,622
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6159
KEVIN RAY SCHRUBB, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus EDWARD MURRAY, Director, Virginia Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-94-180-2) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 2, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Ray Schrubb, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Schrubb v. Murray , No. CA-94-180-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 10.24**

**CRYO-CELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.**

**AMENDMENT TO 2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**

**ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON**

**AUGUST 14, 2008**

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Section 4.1(e) of the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan be, and hereby is, amended toread in its entirety as follows: 

“(e) Manner of Exercise. An Option may be exercised in whole or in part, by giving writtennotice to the Company, specifying the number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased and accompanied by the full Option Price for such shares. The Option Price shall be payable (a) in United States dollars upon exercise of the Option, and maybe paid by cash, uncertified or certified check or bank draft; (b) unless otherwise provided in the Option Agreement, by delivery of shares of Common Stock in payment of all or any part of the Option Price, which shares shall be valued for thispurpose at the Fair Market Value on the date that such Option is exercised; or (c) unless otherwise provided in the Option Agreement, by instructing the Company to withhold from the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Optionshares of Common Stock in payment of all or any part of the Exercise Price and/or any related withholding tax obligations consistent with Section 9.2, which shares shall be valued for this purpose at the Fair Market Value or in such othermanner as may be authorized from time to time by the Committee. Prior to the issuance of shares of Common Stock upon the exercise of an Option, a Participant shall have no rights as a stockholder.”
vogel-employmentagreemen






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






 





 






  A-3   6. This Release shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of New  York, without reference to the principles of conflicts of law thereof.  7. Executive acknowledges that Sections 5-12 of the Employment Agreement will  continue to survive, and remain in full force and effect, following his execution of this  Release.      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive, the Company and the Parent have executed the  Release as of the date and year first written above.     EAGLE SHIPPING INTERNATIONAL  (USA) LLC        By: _________________________________  Name:  Title:       EAGLE BULK SHIPPING INC.         By: _________________________________  Name:  Title:        EXECUTIVE        ____________________________________  Name: Gary Vogel
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Deposting of Stockyards

    Notice is hereby given, that the livestock markets named herein, 
originally posted on the dates specified below as being subject to the 
Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, as amended (7 U.S.C. 181 et seq.), no 
longer come within the definition of a stockyard under the Act and are 
therefore, no longer subject to the provisions of the Act.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Facility No., name, and location of                                    
              stockyard                         Date of posting         
------------------------------------------------------------------------
AZ-100, Arizona Livestock Auction,    February 12, 1975.                
 Inc., Phoenix, Arizona.                                                
IA-111, Audubon County Livestock      May 28, 1959.                     
 Exchange, Audubon, Iowa.                                               
IA-127, Coggon Livestock Sales Co.,   May 18, 1959.                     
 Coggon, Iowa.                                                          
IA-163, Independence Livestock Sales  May 23, 1959.                     
 Company, Independence, Iowa.                                           
IA-259, The Auction Farm, Sheldon,    July 21, 1987.                    
 Iowa.                                                                  
NB-177, Spalding Livestock Market,    January 27, 1950.                 
 Spalding, Nebraska.                                                    
NY-157, Bast's Livestock Exchange,    August 2, 1978.                   
 Watertown, New York.                                                   
NC-167, Foothills Livestock Auction,  July 11, 1994.                    
 Inc., Spindale, North Carolina.                                        
PA-115, Green Dragon Livestock        December 10, 1959.                
 Sales, Ephrata, Pennsylvania.                                          
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice is in the nature of a change relieving a restriction 
and, thus, may be made effective in less than 30 days after publication 
in the Federal Register without prior notice or other public procedure. 
This notice is given pursuant to section 302 of the Packers and 
Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. 202) and is effective upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Done at Washington, D.C. this 3rd day of February 1997.
Daniel L. Van Ackeren,
Director, Livestock Marketing Division, Packers and Stockyards 
Programs.
[FR Doc. 97-3375 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-KD-P
#### Carl JULIAN, Frank Gullace and Donald F. Field, Appellants, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida, Garland Copley and Faye Copley, his wife, South Orlando Land Corp., also known as South Orlando Land Corporation, a Florida corporation, and the United States of America, Appellees.

No. 70-749.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 15, 1971.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Steven G. ROSICH, Appellee.

No. 70-1037.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 28, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 12   AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited)    Three Months Ended March 31,(dollars in thousands)20082007Earnings:
Loss before credit for income taxes$ (47,371)$ (46,868)Interest expense306,235297,666Implicit interest in rents5,5585,367Total earnings$264,422$256,165Fixed charges:
Interest expense$306,235$297,666Implicit interest in rents5,5585,367Total fixed charges$311,793$303,033Ratio of earnings to fixed charges0.850.85   42