alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7224 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7224

 To amend section 212(a)(3)(D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
  with respect to inadmissibility based on membership in the Chinese 
                Communist Party, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2020

Mr. Reschenthaler introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 212(a)(3)(D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
  with respect to inadmissibility based on membership in the Chinese 
                Communist Party, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``End Chinese Communist Citizenship 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INADMISSIBILITY BASED ON MEMBERSHIP IN A TOTALITARIAN PARTY.

    Section 212(a)(3)(D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1182 (a)(3)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by inserting ``(I) Chinese Communist 
        Party or its successor, or (II)'' after ``with the''; and
            (2) by striking clauses (iii) and (iv).
                                 <all>
```
# Cooley

M

. Anne Swanson +1 202 776 2534 aswanson@cooley

.com December 22, 2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 By Electronic Filing

Re: Application for Amendment to Exemption 11520, AeroVironment, Inc

. FAA Docket 2015-0330 Dear Sir or Madam: On May 11, 2015, the FAA issued Exemption 11520 to AeroVironment, Inc. ("AeroVironment") allowing commercial operation ofthe AeroVironment Shrike under Section 333 ofthe FAA modernization and Reform Act of 2012

.1 This letter requests an amendment to add the following AeroVironment manufactured aircraft to Condition 1 of Exemption 11520 for commercial use in aerial data collection operations, which would include powerline inspections: 1) AeroVironment Puma II AE 2) AeroVironment Raven 3) AeroVironment WASP 4) AeroVironment Qube 5) AeroVironment Boomerang AeroVironment is willing to accept what are now the standard conditions that the FAA issues in Section 333 exemptions for aerial data collection. (See, e.g., Exemption 13996 issued to Texas-New Mexico Power Company.) To the extent necessary, AeroVironment refers the FAA to its previously filed exemption requests for a listing of regulations for which an exemption is being sought, a demonstration ofthe public interest, and a showing of an equivalent level of safety. 2 AeroVironment notes that the FAA has granted similar exemptions for aerial data

1 See Exemption No. 11520, May 11, 2015, Docket No. FAA-2015-0330. In addition to Exemption 11520, AeroVironment has received the following three Section 333 Exemptions: Exemption 11435, April27, 2015, Docket No. FAA-2015-0214 (AeroVironment Shrike); Exemption 11264, April 1, 2015, Docket No

. FAA-2014-0762 (AeroVironment Puma AE DOL) ; and Exemption 11261, April1, 2015, Docket No. FAA-2014-0715 (AeroVironment PumaAE DOL). 2 Applicant interprets Section 333 as placing a duty on the Administrator not only to process applications for exemptions under Section 333 but, if he determines that the conditions set forth herein do not fulfill the statutory requirements for approval , to craft conditions for the safe operation ofthe UAS. Cooley LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington , DC 20004-2400 t: (202) 842-7800 f: (202) 842-7899 cooley.com

# Cooley

U

.S

. Department ofTransportation December 22, 2015 Page Two collection. 3 For all the reasons set forth in AeroVironment's Section 333 exemption requests, which have been granted and are incorporated herein by reference, the FAA should grant AeroVironment's instant amendment request. Ifyou have any questions, please contact us at your earliest convenience. 

# (**Ve~ ;I!** **C-**

# "----**~ Swans** **~** Counsel for AeroVironment, Inc. cc: Mr. Rick May Mr. Jake Troutman Mr. Dean Griffith, Esquire Mr. Dan Ngo Mr.**Jo~athan** Scott

3 See, e.g., GR Innovative Mediaworks, Ltd

., Exemption No

. 14001, December 16,2015, Docket No. FAA-2015-3445; Texas-New Mexico Power Company, Exemption 13996, December 16, 2015, Docket No. FAA-2015-3563. Cooley LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20004-2400 t: (202) 842-7800 f: (202) 842-7899 cooley.com
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as 
Amended

    In accordance with Department of Justice policy, 28 CFR Sec. 50.7, 
notice is hereby given that a proposed consent decree in the action 
entitled United States of America v. James Bartlett, Joanne Bartlett, 
Bartlett Disposal Service, Inc., and Bartlett Disposal Service Company, 
Civil Action No. 97-CV-1800 (TJM/GLS) (N.D.N.Y.), was lodged on 
December 10, 1997 with the United States District Court for the 
Northern District of New York. The proposed consent decree resolves 
claims asserted by the United States, on behalf of the U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, against the defendants under the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601-9675. These claims are for recovery 
of response costs incurred by the United States in connection with the 
Sidney Landfill Superfund Site (``Site''), located in Delaware County, 
New York.
    Under the terms of the proposed consent decree, the defendants will 
pay $99,309 to the United States in reimbursement of response costs 
incurred by the United States with respect to the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of this publication, comments relating to the 
proposed consent decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant 
Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. 
Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530, and should refer to United 
States v. James Bartlett, Joanne Bartlett, Bartlett Disposal Service, 
Inc., and Bartlett Disposal Service Company, Civil Action No. 97-CV-
1800 (TJM/GLS) (N.D.N.Y.), DOJ Ref. No. 90-11-2-1128D.
    The proposed consent decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney, 445 Broadway, Room 231, Albany, New York 12207; 
the Region II Office of the Environmental Protection Agency, 290 
Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866; and the Consent Decree 
Library, 1120 G Street, N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20005, 
telephone (202) 624-0892. A copy of the proposed consent decree may be 
obtained in person or by mail from the Consent Decree Library. In 
requesting a copy, please refer to the referenced case and enclose a 
check in the amount of $7.25 (25 cents per page reproduction costs) 
made payable to Consent Decree Library.
Joel M. Gross,
Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-33825 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, E. Laughlin Flanagan, President and Chief
Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have read this annual report on Form 10-K of Polymer Solutions, Inc.;

2. To my knowledge, this report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

3. To my knowledge, the information in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations as of March
31, 2003.

Date: June 12, 2003
                                          /s/  E. LAUGHLIN FLANAGAN

                                          E. Laughlin Flanagan
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Polymer Solutions, Inc. and will be retained by Polymer Solutions,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                     -117-
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-130007, No. 333-10178 and No. 333-31813 on Form S-8 and No. 333-129242, No. 333-125012, No. 333-117768, and No. 333-95235 on Form S-3 of our reports dated April 13,2006 (December 12, 2006 as to the effects of the restatement discussed in Note 20), relating to the consolidated financial statements of The Wet Seal, Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting (which reports (1) express an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements and include an explanatory paragraph relating to the restatement as described in Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements and(2) express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Wet Seal, Inc. for the year ended January 28, 2006. 

Costa Mesa, California 

December 12, 2006
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Artesian Resources Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-78043, No. 333-31209, No. 333-05255) on Forms S-8 and registration statement
(No. 333-88531) on Form S-3 of Artesian Resources Corporation of our report
dated March 30, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Artesian
Resources Corporation as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the
related financial statement schedule as listed in Item 15 of this Form 10-K for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report
appears in the December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of Artesian
Resources Corporation.


/s/KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 17, 2006
#### STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and Reida Davis, Appellants, v. Kenneth PAULK, Appellee.

No. 70-369.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 10, 1971.

Appeal dismissed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JUAN MIGUEL SERRANO, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2131

)

ISABEL RIVES RIVES, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed February 21, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; Joseph G. Foster, Judge.

Jorge de la Mar of Jorge de la Mar, P.A., 

Miami, for Appellant.

Elizabeth Humann of Law Office of 

James W. Chandler, Naples, and Keith 

W. Upson of The Upson Law Group, P.L., 

Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 1, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:   March 17, 2011 |   | /s/Peter   P. Hausback                                 |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Peter   P. Hausback                                    |
|                         |   | Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |   | Principal   Financial and Accounting Officer           |

 

----

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IB 

Union Calendar No. 28 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2008 

[Report No. 117–45] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 

programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 18, 2021 

Ms. CRAIG (for herself and Mr. MAST) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

MAY 28, 2021 

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure; committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2008 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain programs relating to nonpoint source 

management, and for other purposes. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2008 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Water Protection 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONPOINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS. 

7 Section 319(j) of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

8 Act (33 U.S.C. 1329(j)) is amended by striking ‘‘sub9 sections (h) and (i) not to exceed’’ and all that follows 

10 through ‘‘fiscal year 1991’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (h) 

11 and (i) $200,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2022 

12 through 2026’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 28 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2008 

[Report No. 117–45] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

poses. nonpoint source management, and for other purto reauthorize certain programs relating to 

MAY 28, 2021 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Price C. SPIVEY, Administrator of the Seafarers Welfare Plan, Appellant, v. WINDJAMMER SHIPPING, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 73-683.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 4, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Stuart JACOBS, Appellant, v. Sheila JACOBS, Appellee.

No. 73-1037.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Seminole County; J. William Woodson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000025657
<NAME>                        Crested Corp
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    1

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  AUG-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        2,928,800
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 2,324,500
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   122,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              5,376,100
<PP&E>                        5,964,800
<DEPRECIATION>                3,472,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                8,145,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         9,680,300
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      10,300
<OTHER-SE>                    (2,324,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  8,145,200
<SALES>                       127,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              245,700
<CGS>                         210,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 210,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              502,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (491,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (491,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (491,400)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.05)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32(a)**

 

**DPL Inc.**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned officerof DPL Inc. (the “Issuer”) hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2010, which this certificate accompanies, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that the information contained therein fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuers asof the dates and for the periods expressed therein.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adoptingthe signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thisstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hasbeen provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuers and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
| /s/ Paul M. Barbas                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul M. Barbas                         |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

Date: April 29, 2010

 

The foregoing certificateis being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is notbeing filed as part of the Issuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

1

----
#### DADE COUNTY, a governmental subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. UNIVERSAL AMERICAN REALTY CORP., a Delaware corporation, Appellee. DADE COUNTY, a governmental subdivision of the State of Florida, et al., Appellants, v. SOUTH DADE UTILITIES, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

Nos. 68-632 to 68-635, 68-735, 68-631, 68-734.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 3, 1970.

Thomas C. Britton, County Atty., and Joan Elizabeth Odell, Asst. County Atty., for appellants.

Patton, Kanner, Tietig & Segal and Edward C. Tietig, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and SWANN, JJ-

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on April IS, 1969 (Fla.App., 227 So.2d 317) affirming in part and reversing in part the judgments of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled causes; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed January 28, 1970 (232 So.2d 16) and mandate now lodged in this court, reversed a portion of this court’s judgment with directions ;

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the mandates of this court issued in this cause on June 16, 1969 be withdrawn, that portion of this court’s judgment reversed by the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The opinion and judgment of this court, except as withdrawn and vacated aforesaid, is adhered to and the causes are remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings in accordance with the said opinions and judgments of the Supreme Court of Florida and of this court. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the circuit court (Rule 3.16(b), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).
Exhibit 32   Certifications   In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, of American General Finance Corporation (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of Frederick W. Geissinger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Donald R. Breivogel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/Frederick W. GeissingerFrederick W. GeissingerPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.Donald R. Breivogel, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:August 7, 2008   48
#### Donnie DISMUKES v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 47496.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 5, 1973.

Howard C. Coleman, West Point, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Ben H. Walley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; Joe O. Sams, Sr., Judge.

Before GILLESPIE, C. J., and PATTERSON, INZER, WALKER and BROOM, JJ.

Affirmed.