alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Brad Pufpaff <bpufpaff@gmail.com>

Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 3:16 PM

To: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Cc: Brad Pufpaff

Subject: Re: Petition for Exemption: RPM, LLC (Docket No. FAA-2014-1125)

Ms. Daniels,

I would like to retract my petition for exemption Docket No. FAA

‐ 2014

‐ 1125.

Brad Pufpaff

On Apr 1, 2015, at 10:04, < Nia.Daniels@faa.gov > < Nia.Daniels@faa.gov > wrote:



### April 1, 2015

Mr. Bradley Pufpaff

Chief Operations Officer

RPM, LLC

P.O. Box 1018

Rogersville, AL 35652

Dear Mr. Pufpaff:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA-2014-1125). This information is necessa ry for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 

### Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorc raft, lighter-than-air)

for the proposed UAS operation. The desc ription should include the maximum weight

(including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or

electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any

further, we must receive the information descri bed above by April 15, 2015. If we do not receive

the information, we will close the do cket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW2 Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267

‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267

‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000861050
<NAME> UNISTONE, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,435
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     (26,035)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,510
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,510)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,913)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
256 La. 895

#### O. Romaine RUSSELL, James C. Dixon and Gloria Gelpi v. John J. McKEITHEN, Governor of the State of Louisiana.

No. 50915.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 8, 1970.

In re: John J. McKeithen, Governor of the State of Louisiana, applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 239 So.2d 656.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 701 

To provide for the transfer of the TARAWA class amphibious ship USS 

NASSAU (LHA–4) to Japan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2019 

Mr. CONAWAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the transfer of the TARAWA class 

amphibious ship USS NASSAU (LHA–4) to Japan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FriendSHIP Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF THE TARAWA CLASS AMPHIBIOUS 

6 SHIP USS NASSAU (LHA–4) TO JAPAN. 

7 (a) TRANSFER BY SALE OR GRANT.—The President 

8 is authorized to transfer the TARAWA class amphibious 

9 ship USS NASSAU (LHA–4) to Japan on a sale basis 

10 under section 21 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 701 IH

1 U.S.C. 2761) or on a grant basis under section 516 of 

2 the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j). 

3 (b) COSTS OF TRANSFERS.—Any expense incurred by 

4 the United States in connection with a transfer authorized 

5 by this section shall be charged to the recipient notwith6 standing section 516(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

7 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j(e)). 

8 (c) REPAIR AND REFURBISHMENT IN UNITED

9 STATES SHIPYARDS.—To the maximum extent prac10 ticable, the President shall require, as a condition of the 

11 transfer of a vessel under this section, that the recipient 

12 to which the vessel is transferred have such repair or re13 furbishment of the vessel as is needed, before the vessel 

14 joins the naval forces of that recipient, performed at a 

15 shipyard located in the United States, including a United 

16 States Navy shipyard. 

17 (d) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to 

18 transfer a vessel under this section shall expire at the end 

19 of the 3-year period beginning on the date of the enact20 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### Beecher Beatrice WHISENANT, as Administratrix of the Estate of Helen Whisenant LaFleur, Deceased, Appellant, v. Claudius Elbert CURETON and Bankers Fire and Casualty Company, Appellees.

No. 74-207.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 25, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; James Knott, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# The Effects of Ultra

- Low Sulfur Gasoline on Emissions from Tier 2 Vehicles in the In

- Use Fleet

Final Report

Appendix A Details of On-Road Mileage Accumulation Route

Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NOTICE

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data thatare currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments.

EPA-420-R-14-002 March 2014Appendix A. Details of On-Road Mileage Accumulation Route
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33741]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-5941-5]


Water Conservation Plan Guidelines Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 20-21, 1998, the Water Conservation Plan Guidelines 
Subcommittee of the Local Government Advisory Committee will hold a 
meeting in Austin, Texas. The Subcommittee will discuss the American 
Water Works Association's proposed guidelines and EPA's draft outline 
of the guidelines. The Subcommittee meeting is open and all interested 
persons are invited to attend on a space-available basis.

DATES: The Subcommittee meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m. on Tuesday, January 20, 1998, and from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon on 
Wednesday, January 21, 1998.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Waller Creek Center, 625 
East 10th Street, Austin, Texas 78701. On Tuesday the meeting will be 
in Room 105, and on Wednesday the meeting will be in the Training Room.
    Requests for a summary of the meeting can be obtained by writing to 
John E. Flowers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of 
Wastewater Management (Mail Code 4204), 401 M Street, S.W., Washington, 
D.C. 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Official for 
this Subcommittee is John E. Flowers. He is the point of contact for 
information concerning any Subcommittee matters and can be reached by 
calling (202) 260-7288.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
Alfred W. Lindsey,
Deputy Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 97-33741 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
#### George C. MATTHEWS, Petitioner, v. SEABOARD PROPERTIES, INC., et al., Respondents.

No. 43890.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 23, 1973.

Petition denied.

CARLTON, C. J, and ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ, concur.
Chem ours 

April 20, 2016 

Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested 

70150640000596575480 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Enviromnental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution A venue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

RE: EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2003 - 0012 

The Chemours Company 

Fluoroproducts 

67 Canal Road, P. 0. Box 9001 

Chambers Works - Pedersen Building 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

Cll.UC Control Number 

369078 

Chemours Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

March. 2016 Sample Data 

D\lar Chemical Control Division: 

Attached please find summaries of PFOA analytical results for the Chemours 

Chambers Works weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in March 

2016. 

In accordance with the current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 

2011), these results are provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic 

discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic 

copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. 

NJDEP asked The Chemours Company FC, LLC to analyze for and report monthly 

Spot 662 PFNA concentrations for 12 months. The ninth of the requested 12 samples 

is reported in the attached table. 

Sine. erely, ,1 . .. . .............. . 

1c::.---t~-~) IC / 

Amu:\h{ Jeyarajasingam 

Area Manager - Secnre Enviromnental Treatment 

Chemours Chambers Works 

AJ/clc 

Enclosures 
Copy to: 

~ Docmnent Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ms. Heather Genievich (cover letter only) 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Surface Water Permitting 

Mail Code 401-02B 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box420 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 
Analyte 

PFOA 

PFNA 

Summary of Analytical Results 

662 - March 2016 

Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 

Date 3/7/16 3/14/16 3/21/16 3/28/16 

Top (ft) 0 0 0 0 

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0 0 0 0 

units Diss. (D) Duplicate# 1 1 1 1 ' 

ug/L T 4.27 3.37 3.34 3.11: 

iug/L T NA NA 0.552 NA 

PFNA = Perfluorononanoic Acid 

PFOA - Pertluorooctanoic Acid 

ug/L - micrograms per Liter 

ug/L - micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) 

LOQ - limit of quantification - 0..1 DO ug/L 

NA - not analyzed 

Samples were analyzed by Critical .Path Services LLC. Rep.orted results 

represent a single analysis, e.xcept for the sample collected on 3/21/16. 

Acceptable precision was obtairied and the reported results for 

the sample collected on 3/21/16 represent the a.verage of lab 

duplicate results. ' I 

I . I 

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. 

I 

- - ' 

-

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 

Copy of cwk 662 grab results_mar16.xls:Sheet1 

4/19/2016 1:58 PM
US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR 4th QUARTER 2013

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

ANNOUNCEMENT AUCTION SETTLEMENT OFFERED MATURING NEW

ISSUE DATE DATE DATE AMOUNT AMOUNT MONEY

4-WK 3-MO 6-MO 12-MO

4-WEEK AND 9/26 9/30 10/3 45.00 31.00 26.00 100.00 2.00

3&6&12 MO BILLS 10/3 10/7 10/10 45.00 31.00 25.00 100.00 1.00

10/10 10/14 10/17 45.00 31.00 25.00 125.00 -24.00

10/17 10/21 10/24 45.00 31.00 25.00 25.00 93.00 33.00

10/24 10/28 10/31 45.00 31.00 25.00 99.00 2.00

10/31 11/4 11/7 45.00 31.00 25.00 99.00 2.00

11/7 11/12 11/14 45.00 31.00 25.00 124.00 -23.00

11/14 11/18 11/21 45.00 32.00 25.00 25.00 100.00 27.00

11/21 11/25 11/26 45.00 32.00 25.00 100.00 2.00

11/26 12/2 12/5 45.00 32.00 25.00 100.00 2.00

12/5 12/9 12/12 45.00 32.00 25.00 125.00 -23.00

12/12 12/16 12/19 45.00 32.00 25.00 25.00 100.00 27.00

12/19 12/23 12/26 45.00 32.00 25.00 100.00 2.00

1395.00 1365.00 30.00

CASH MANAGEMENT BILLS

CMB Funds: 0.00

COUPONS

CHANGE

3-year Note 10/3 10/8 10/15 30.00 -1.00

10-year Note ® 10/3 10/9 10/15 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 10/3 10/10 10/15 13.00 0.00 32.28 31.72

30-year TIPS ® 10/10 10/17 10/31 7.00 0.00

2-year note 10/17 10/22 10/31 32.00 -1.00

5-year note 10/17 10/23 10/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 10/17 10/24 10/31 29.00 0.00 61.40 41.61

3-year Note 10/30 11/5 11/15 30.00 0.00

10-year Note 10/30 11/6 11/15 24.00 0.00

30-year Bond 10/30 11/7 11/15 16.00 0.00 63.49 6.51

10-year TIPS ® 11/7 11/14 11/29 13.00 0.00

2-year note 11/14 11/19 12/2 32.00 0.00

5-year note 11/14 11/20 12/2 35.00 0.00

7-year note 11/14 11/21 12/2 29.00 0.00 64.41 44.60

3-year Note 12/5 12/10 12/16 30.00 0.00

10-year Note ® 12/5 12/11 12/16 21.00 0.00

30-year Bond ® 12/5 12/12 12/16 13.00 0.00 32.47 31.53

2-year note 12/12 12/16 12/31 32.00 0.00

5-year note 12/12 12/17 12/31 35.00 0.00

7-year note 12/12 12/18 12/31 29.00 0.00

5-year TIPS ® 12/12 12/19 12/31 16.00 0.00 66.18 45.82

522.00 320.21 201.79

Estimates are italicized. R = Reopening

NET CASH RAISED THIS QUARTER: 232
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10249]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7858]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``1812: A Nation Emerges''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``1812: A Nation Emerges,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The National 
Portrait Gallery, Washington, DC from on or about June 15, 2012, until 
on or about January 27, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 19, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-10249 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 6, 2016

t0829 

# Order

Clerk September 6, 2016

151934 (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 151934

COA: 327141

Muskegon CC: 00

- 045327

- FC

WALTER NEAL, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 2, 2016

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Global Investor Services, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the year ended March, 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas S.
Maturo, the Chief Executive Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
June 29th
2010





/s/
Nicholas S. Maturo


Nicholas S. Maturo


Chief
Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

AARON GARIBAY DELGADO, a.k.a.

Brain, a.k.a. Aaron Ruben GaribayDelgado,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50383

D.C. No. 8:08-cr-00283-JVS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Aaron Garibay Delgado appeals from the 235-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846, and

FILED

DEC 30 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50383

for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Delgado contends that the district court committed procedural error by

treating the sentencing range calculated by reference to the Career Offender

Guideline, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(b)(A), as “virtually mandatory,” by overemphasizing

the need for deterrence, and by “fail[ing] to recognize the numerous ways in which

courts are permitted to deviate from the career offender guidelines.” The record

belies these contentions.

Delgado also argues that his sentence was substantively unreasonable

because the district court ignored “the tremendous extent to which [his] priors

unreasonably increased [his] advisory Guidelines” and gave “virtually no weight to

his personal characteristics and history.” He argues that his sentence was greater

than necessary to serve the objectives of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). These contentions

are without merit. The 235-month sentence, which was 57 months below the

correctly-calculated advisory Sentencing Guidelines range, was substantively

reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of

the circumstances. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008)

(en banc).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.1


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION


I, George P. Sakellaris, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameresco, Inc. (the “Registrant”);


2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))  and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:


(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  March 31, 2011/s/ George P. SakellarisGeorge P. SakellarisPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)