alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

COMMISSIONERS: Deborah Platt Majoras, Chairman

Orson Swindle

Thomas B. Leary

Pamela Jones Harbour

Jon Leibowitz

________________________________________________

In the Matter of |

|

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY N.V. |

 a foreign corporation, |

|

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON COMPANY, | Docket No. 9300

a corporation, and |

|

PITT-DES MOINES, INC., |

a corporation. |

 |

________________________________________________|

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART RESPONDENTS’ MOTION

FOR IN CAMERA TREATMENT OF MATERIAL PREVIOUSLY

DESIGNATED AS CONFIDENTIAL

Pursuant to Commission Rule 3.45(b), Respondents Chicago Bridge & Iron Company

N.V. and Chicago Bridge & Iron Company (“CB&I” or “the Respondents”) have filed a Motion

for In Camera Treatment of Material Previously Designated as Confidential (“the Motion”). 

The materials for which CB&I seeks in camera treatment consist of Attachment A to Complaint

Counsel’s Opposition to Respondents’ Petition to Reconsider (“the Opposition”) (Exhibit A of

the Motion), related discussion on page 12 of the Opposition that was redacted from the public

version of the Opposition, and portions of the Motion and Exhibit B of the Motion (Affidavit of

Richard E. Goodrich). CB&I seeks in camera treatment of these materials for a period of five

years.

CB&I asserts that the material in question was previously submitted to the Commission’s

staff and was designated highly confidential at that time. The Respondents claim that the

material contains “highly confidential business information, the release or publication of which
2

would substantially harm CB&I’s business.” Motion at 2. CB&I also maintains that it has

endeavored to preserve the secrecy of this information. Complaint Counsel does not oppose

Respondents’ motion.

The Commission finds that CB&I has satisfied the standard set forth in Commission Rule

3.45(b) and shown that the disclosure of the information for which it seeks in camera treatment

would likely result in “clearly defined, serious injury.” 16 C.F.R. § 3.45(b). See H.P. Hood &

Sons, Inc., 58 F.T.C. 1184, 1188 (1961); Bristol-Myers Co., 90 F.T.C. 455, 456 (1977); General

Foods Corp., 95 F.T.C. 352, 355 (1980). The Commission, however, is not persuaded that in

camera treatment should be granted for the five-year period requested by CB&I. The

information for which such treatment is being granted is temporal in nature, and its competitive

sensitivity is likely to diminish over time. Accordingly, the Commission believes that a two-year

period is appropriate.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that (a) Exhibit A to the Motion and (b) those

portions of the Motion, Exhibit B thereto, and the Opposition that were redacted in the public

record shall be afforded in camera treatment for a period of two years from the date of this

Order, at which time Respondents may show cause why those materials should not be made

public.

By the Commission.

Donald S. Clark

Secretary

SEAL

ISSUED: May 9, 2005
1676 International Drive, McLean, VA 22102 (253) 282-2923 MRamsey767@aol.com

January 25, 2013

VIA HAND DELIVERY

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140

200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request 14 C.F.R. Part 125, Docket No.: FAA-2012-0579

Dear Sir:

On May 24, 2012, Jet Stream Aviation, LLC, d/b/a Jetstream Aviation 

(“Jetstream”) petitioned pursuant to Section 11.61(b) of the Federal Aviation Regulations

("FARs") for an exemption from FAR Part 125, to the extent necessary to list the 

Bombardier Inc. CL-600-2B16 aircraft, serial number 5864, FAA Registration Number 

N605BB (“Challenger”) on the Operations Specifications of Jetstream’s existing 

Operating Certificate Number 7JAB821M, dated March 9, 2011.

The sole purpose of this petition is to permit Jetstream to operate the Challenger 

under Part 125’s higher level of safety than under Part 91. To remove any doubt in this 

regard, Jetstream emphasizes the following:

1. As stated in the original petition, if this request is approved, Jetstream 

would operate the Challenger under Part 125 in its entirety and not seek 

any deviation from any provision of Part 125.

2. Jetstream assures the FAA that this request is made in full recognition that 

all aircraft operated under its Operating Certificate will be used only for 

private carriage and that no holding out to the public will occur.

3. Jetstream further commits to the FAA that, if this request were granted, 

the Challenger would be used for no more than a single private carriage 

client.

In sum, Jetstream emphasizes that it is seeking to voluntarily comply with a 

higher standard of safety than is required and simply requests the permission of the FAA 

to do so. 
1676 International Drive, McLean, VA 22102 (253) 282-2923 MRamsey767@aol.com

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions or need additional

information regarding this request.

Sincerely,

Mark Ramsey

Director of Operations

Jetstream Aviation
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter J. Zable,Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
| /s/ W. J. Zable                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| W. J. Zable                                      |
| Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                             |
| Date: August 2, 2006                             |

 

----
#### Dorothy WILCOX, Appellant, v. Nora M. O’HARA, Appellee.

No. 74-49.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Fourth District.

Feb. 26, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Palm Beach County; William C. Williams, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
# Not Found

The requested URL /os/caselist/0123039/os/2001/11/leineragree.htm was not found on this server.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EC97-58-000]


USGen Power Services, L.P.; Notice of Filing

December 2, 1997.
    Take notice that USGen Power Services, L.P., on November 13, 1997, 
tendered for filing a correction to the September 19, 1997 filing in 
this docket.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such 
motions or protests should be filed on or before December 10, 1997. 
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants 
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must 
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the 
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-31975 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130204 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. BIORESOURCE, INC., Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

and

OPPMAC, INC., Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130204 COA: 266668 Wayne CC: 01-123531-CH CITY OF DETROIT, JOE VASSALLO, PAUL BERNARD, and FREDERICK ROTTACH, Defendants-Appellants,

and

CENTRAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES, INC., SAM FODALE, JERRY FODALE, STATE OF MICHIGAN, and DIAMOND DISMANTLING, INC., Defendants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because the Cour t is not persuaded that the questions presented should be revie wed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.

l0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
#### Robert W. COX, Appellant, v. Jean U. COX, Appellee.

No. 72-1318.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2176100
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      19100
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          464100
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        265500
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  469100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3393900
<COMMON>                                           400
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       788200
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             465400
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1254000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      22900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            660700
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               73200
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  123500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   225400
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1034200
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3393900
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       362900
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             44500
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      238600
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      283100
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          79800
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               16400
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   96200
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         24400
<NET-INCOME>                                     71800
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        200
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    71600
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         55800
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        27900
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          101700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.74
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Nikos K. Kardassis, certify that:
1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ML Life InsuranceCompany of New York;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Dated:March 28, 2005    /s/ NIKOS K. KARDASSIS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES WHITFIELD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-644

[July 6, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Caroline Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502019CF001051BMB.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Louis G. Carres, Assistant 

Regional Conflict Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. SolagesJones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3349]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
[FEMA-3123-EM]


Rhode Island; Amendment to Notice of an Emergency Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency for the State of 
Rhode Island (FEMA-3123-EM), dated November 19, 1996, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 28, 1997

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that in a letter 
dated January 24, 1997, the President amended his declaration of 
November 19, 1996, to define the incident period for this disaster as 
November 17, 1996 and continuing.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Catherine H. Light,
Deputy Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-3349 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-02-P
From: thomas.patzner@schneider-electric.com [mailto:thomas.patzner@schneider-electric.com] 

Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 1:43 PM 

To: Richard Parker 

Cc: Meyers, Aaron; adelaski@standardsasap.org; ahofmann@publicpower.org; Trujillo, Antonio; 

BermanEconomics@gmail.com; Brian Coffey; bruce.r.hirsch@bge.com; bsmith@federalpacific.com; 

cabolduc@lbl.gov; Caitlin Johnson; carlosgsiqueiros@eaton.com; carlos.gaytan@ge.com; 

chad.kennedy@us.schneider-electric.com; chuck.simmons@pgnmail.com; Daniel.Cohen@hq.doe.gov; 

dave.millure@metglas.com; eduardorobles@eaton.com; Eric.Petersen@aksteel.com; gbf1@pge.com; 

gjrosenquist@lbl.gov; greg.coulter405@gmail.com; Moore, Jack C; Schneider, Jeffrey A; Smith, Jennifer; 

Corkran, Jerry L; jerry.schoen@aksteel.com; Jerry Hodge; Jim.creevy@nema.org; 

jmauer@standardsasap.org; john.caskey@nema.org; john.cymbalsky@ee.doe.gov; jrossetti@mlgw.org; 

kcoughlin@lbl.gov; kwinder@mleainc.com; mark.stoering@xcelenergy.com; mhyland@appanet.org; 

Loomans, Michael T; Michael Rivest; mwaltner@nrdc.org; Paul.Ryan@hitmet.com; Phil Hopkinson; 

pkumar@publicpower.org; Raymond.Polinski@atimetals.com; Poole, Raymond L; 

rgreeson@federalpacific.com; Marusinec, Richard M; rick.anderson@faypwc.com; 

robert.saint@nreca.coop; rroy@nrdc.org; ScottB@lvmetals.com; snadel@aceee.org; 

srosenstock@eei.org; tballo@earthjustice.org; Teckman@nwcouncil.org; 

vijay.tendulkar@onyxpower.com; wes.patterson@us.abb.com 

Subject: Distribution Transformers Committee requested areas for the DOE to Investigate before final 

rules are selected - LOW VOLTAGE 

Mr. Parker During our first team meeting I commented on the National Electric Code, below are the two sections of 

the code to allow members of the Working Group to evaluate. 

Sizing of Low Voltage Transformers NEC Article 220 Branch-Circuit, Feeder, and Service Calculations II Branch-Circuit Load Calculations 220.14 (I) Receptacle Outlets 

Installation NEC Article 110 Requirements for Electrical Installations II. 600 Volts, Nominal, or Less 110.26 Spaces About Electrical Equipment. 

Thomas Patzner | Low Voltage Transformers | Square D / Schneider Electric 

1010 Airpark Center Drive | Nashville, TN 37217 |  Office: 615-844-8536 |  Five Digit Dialing: 48536  e-mail: thomas.patzner@us.schneider-electric.com |  Website: www.us.squared.com/EEXFMR Low Voltage Transformer Technical Support  e-mail: lvgp-marketing@us.schneider-electric.com 

 Please consider the environment before printing this email
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 20 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk September 20 , 2017

15 6 066 ( 72 )

MICHAEL RAMSEY and GLENN DOWDY

, Plaintiff s

- Appell ee s

, SC: 15 6 066

v C OA : 329920

Wayne CC: 10

- 004708

- CD

LABORERS’ LOCAL 1191, d /b/a

ROAD CONSTRUCTION LABORERS OF

MICHIGAN LOCAL 1191, and MICHAEL

AARON

, Defendant s

- Appellants,

and

BRUCE RUEDISUELI

, Defendant

.

____________________________________ _____ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of plaintiff s

- appell ee s to extend the time

for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED

. The answer

submitted on Septem ber 1 5 , 2017 , is accepted for filing

.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 1, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1540

Lower Tribunal No. 20-3871

________________

Elio Daniel Aponte Cevallos,

Appellant,

vs.

Anthea Ponsetti,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria Elena 

Verde, Judge.

Wasson & Associates, Chartered, and Roy D. Wasson; Genova Family 

Law and Anthony Meehan Genova, for appellant.

Carlton Fields, P.A., and Matthew J. Conigliaro (Tampa), for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40122 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ERICK RICARDO TAPIA-RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-286-1

-------------------- August 24, 2000 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Erick Ricardo Tapia-Rodriguez (Tapia) appeals his conviction for illegal reentry after deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Tapia contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress and to dismiss the indictment, in which he argued that his prior deportation proceedings violated his right to due process. Tapia concedes that the issue raised in this appeal is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. BenitezVillafuerte , 186 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 120 S. Ct. 838 (2000), but raises his contention solely to preserve itNo. 00-40122 -2- for review by the Supreme Court. We affirm the judgment of the district court.
AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33628]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11:00 a.m., Friday, January 30, 1998.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., N.W., Washington, DC, 9th Fl. Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Surveillance Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.
Jean A. Webb,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 97-33628 Filed 12-19-97; 2:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M