alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 1103]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. LP97-167-000]


Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Request Under 
Blanket Authorization

January 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 23, 1996, Natural Gas Pipeline Company 
of America (Natural), 701 East 22nd Street, Lombard, Illinois 60148, 
filed in the above docket a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 
157.212 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for 
authority to operate an existing delivery point located in Love County, 
Oklahoma, that was originally constructed as a receipt point to deliver 
natural gas to Texaco Exploration & Production, Inc. (Texaco), a 
producer; and to provide Natural Gas Act jurisdictional service, 
including transportation services under Subpart G of Part 284 of the 
Commission's Regulations at such delivery point, all as more fully set 
forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    Natural states that it can deliver up to approximately 1,000 MMBtu 
per day of natural gas to Texaco. Natural states that it has sufficient 
capacity to provide these services at the proposed delivery point 
without detriment or disadvantage to Natural's peak day and annual 
delivery capacity.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity is deemed to be authorized 
effective on the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-340 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Global Investor Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended March, 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Kosoff, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





July 19th  2011


/s/ William Kosoff


William Kosoff


Acting Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33733]



[[Page 67667]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICARE PAYMENT ADVISORY COMMISSION


Commission Meeting

AGENCY: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission will hold its next public meeting on Thursday, 
January 15, 1998 and Friday, January 16, 1998 at the Embassy Suites 
Hotel, 1250 22nd Street N.W., Washington, DC in the Consulate/
Ambassador Room. The meetings are tentatively scheduled to begin at 
10:00 a.m. on January 15 and at 8:30 a.m. on January 16.
    At the meeting, the Commission will be reviewing a draft of its 
March 1998 report to the Congress. Among the topics the Commission will 
discuss are: improving Medicare+Choice capitation payments, risk 
adjustment, the adjusted community rate, PPS operating and capital 
updates, disproportionate share payments, moving to prospective payment 
systems for post-acute care, payment policy for hospital outpatient 
department services, physician payment policy, payment issues for 
special populations, and graduate medical education.
    Final agendas will be mailed on January 9, 1998 and will be 
available on the Commission's web sites (WWW.PPRC.GOV and 
WWW.PROPAC.GOV) at that time.

ADDRESSES: 2120 L Street, N.W.; Suite 200; Washington, D.C. 20037. The 
telephone number is 202/653-7220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ann Johnson, Executive Assistant, at 202/653-7220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you are not on the Commission mailing 
list and wish to receive an agenda, please call 202/653-7220 after 
January 9, 1998.
Lauren LeRoy,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-33733 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BW-M
#### John W. COX v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 50692.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 30, 1978.

Charles R. Brett, Tupelo, for appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., by Catherine Walker Underwood, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; L. T. Senter, Jr., Judge.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.2

                         Consent of Independent Auditors



The Board of Directors
Reinhold Industries, Inc.

The audit referred to in our report dated March 16, 2001, included the related
financial statement schedule II-A as of December 31, 2000 and for the year ended
December 31, 2000, included in the December 31, 2000 Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Reinhold Industries, Inc. This financial statement schedule II-A is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the financial statement schedule. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedule II-A, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

We consent to the use of our report included herein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-101589) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Reinhold
Industries, Inc Stock Incentive Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-39925) pertaining to the Reinhold Industries, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan
of our report dated March 16, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Reinhold Industries, Inc. incorporated by reference
and included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2000, respectively.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 24, 2003
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7087 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for rioting, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2020 

Mr. BUDD (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of North Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the 

penalty for rioting, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tolerance for Riot5 ers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTY FOR RIOTING. 

7 Section 2101(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘five years’’ and inserting ‘‘ten 

9 years’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our report dated February 2, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of K•SwissInc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of K•Swiss Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36505, effective August 23, 1990,File No. 33-77258, effective April 4, 1994, File No. 33-95650, effective August 10, 1995, File No. 333-79641, effective May 28, 1999, File No. 333-91864, effective July 7, 2002 and File No. 333-122955,effective February 23, 2005) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-37895, effective October 17, 1997 and File No. 333-60043, effective August 5, 1998). 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

February 2, 2006
**Exhibit31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION of CFO

 

I, William W. Boyle, certifythat:

 

1)              Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cubic Corporation;

 

2)              Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3)              Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this  report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;

 

4)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrantand we have:

 

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this  reportis being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of December 31, 2004; and

 

c)              Disclosedin this  report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s quarter ended December 31, 2004 that has materially affected or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5)              Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

February 7,2005

 
| /S/ W. W. Boyle |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| W. W. Boyle                    |
| Chief  Financial Officer       |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Swift Transportation Co., Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements  No.
33-66034  and  333-20651  on Form  S-3 and in the  Registration  Statements  No.
33-85940,  33-85942,  33-85944 and 333-81403 on Form S-8 of Swift Transportation
Co., Inc. of our report dated  February 25, 2000,  relating to the  consolidated
balance sheets of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31,  1999  and  1998,  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of  earnings,
stockholders'  equity, and cash flows for each of years in the three-year period
ended  December 31, 1999,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1999 annual
report on Form 10-K of Swift Transportation Co., Inc.

                                        /s/ KPMG LLP


Phoenix, Arizona
March 17, 2000
Exhibit 102 Dion Persson Compensation



		

			Exhibit 10.2

		


		

			 

		




		
			﻿
		

		
			Summary of Changes to Compensation Package for Dion Persson
		

		
			On July 6, 2021, Terminix Global Holdings, Inc. (“Terminix” or the “Company”) announced that Dion Persson would no longer serve as Interim General Counsel and Corporate Secretary and would no longer be designated as an executive officer or Section 16 officer of Terminix for SEC purposes. Mr. Persson continues to remain with the Company as Senior Vice President, Special Projects. In this capacity, effective as of July 6, 2021, Mr. Persson’s salary was reduced from $450,000 per year to $250,000 per year and he continues to be eligible for short-term incentive payments and vesting of his outstanding equity awards as scheduled while he remains with the Company.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
#### Bette Jean PATE, divorced wife of Milton Edward Dupuy v. Milton Edward DUPUY and Clarence Ory Dupuy, Jr.

No. 61081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 9, 1977.

In re: Milton Edward Dupuy applying for writ of review. Parish of Orleans.

Writ denied.
EGN 12.31.2013 Ex10I




Exhibit 10(i)
SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY
FIRM TRANSPORTATION SERVICE AGREEMENT                                                                                                     
CONTRACT CODE FSNG1
EXHIBIT A


	
										
	SERVICE
	 
	SERVICE
	 
	RECEIPT POINTS
	 
	MDRQ

	TYPE
	 
	TYPE CODE
	 
	PRINT CODE
	 
	POINT NAME
	 
	(MCF)

	FT
	 
	29
	 
	605500
	 
	COLUMBIA GULF - SHADYSIDE TO SNG
	 
	16,129
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	605400
	 
	SESH-CENTERPOINT TO SNG
	 
	16,931
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	TOTAL PKG
	 
	33,060
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	FT
	 
	31
	 
	605400
	 
	DUNCANVILLE - ENTERPRISE TO SNG
	 
	2,057
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	606400
	 
	SESH - CENTERPOlNT TO SNG
	 
	2,159
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	TOTAL PKG
	 
	4,216
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	FT
	 
	42
	 
	060000
	 
	ELBA TO SNG
	 
	30,000
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	FT
	 
	50
	 
	605500
	 
	COLUMBIA GULF - SHADYSIDE TO SNG
	 
	12,641
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	606500
	 
	SESH - GULF SOUTH TO SNG
	 
	9,646
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	605400
	 
	DUNCANVILLE - ENTERPRISE TO SNG
	 
	22,943
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	TOTAL PKG
	 
	45,230
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	FT
	 
	51
	 
	605500
	 
	COLUMBIA GULF - SHADYSIDE TO SNG
	 
	208
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	606400
	 
	SESH - CENTERPOINT TO SNG
	 
	219
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	427
	


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	TOTAL CONTRACT
	 
	112,933
	









	
					
	By:
	/s/ Dudley C. Reynolds
	By:
	/s/ Janice H. Parker
	 

	 
	ALABAMA GAS CORPORATION
	 
	SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, L.L.C.
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Effective Date: 10/01/2013
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Supersedes the previous Exhibit A
	 
	 
	 








The MDDQ for Service Type Code 42 is In effect solely during the period October 1 through May 31 each year of the term. Beginning April 2014, MDDQ of 30,000 will be reduced to 0 for the months of April through October.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte James Carrillo Garcia

, * Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding

No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 0 1 2

- CR * January 20 , 20 2 2

* Per Curiam Memorand um Opinio n

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.

This court has considered James Carrillo Garcia’s application for writ of

habeas corpus and concludes that the application for writ of habeas corpus should

be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the application for habeas corpus is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                      DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                        JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                                   13,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           765,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             694,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        140,000
<PP&E>                                               11,519,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                        4,807,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        8,569,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3,571,000
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                             10,350,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          8,569,000
<SALES>                                              11,979,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     11,979,000
<CGS>                                                 6,989,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         6,989,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (134,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      347,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (694,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (31,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (748,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.66)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Voxpath Holdings, Inc.,
formerly known as Uintah Mountain Copper Company, on Form 10-KSB for the period
ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, James Anderson, Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





Date: June 8, 2006     /s/James Anderson
                       --------------------------------------------------------
                       James Anderson
                       Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 121

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
MDE 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 

410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.maryland.gov 

LanyHogan 

Governor 

Boyd Rutherford 

Lieutenant Governor 

Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street (3RAOO) 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

Dearj~ 

lfJtJ l B 70f~ 

Ben Grumbles 

Secretary 

On June 4, 2007, Maryland submitted the Baltimore Nonattainment Area 8-Hour Ozone State Implementation 

Plan and Base Year Inventory to EPA for the Maryland, Baltimore Nonattainment Area (BNAA) 1997 0.08 

ppm Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) ("2007 Ozone SIP"). The 2007 Ozone SIP for 

the Baltimore Nonattainment Area included (i) the 2002 Base Year Emissions Inventory, (ii) the 2008 Ozone 

Projected Emission Inventory, (iii) the 2008 Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) Plan, (iv) the RFP Contingency 

Measures, (v) the RACM Analysis, (vi) the 2008 Transportation Conformity Budgets for the Baltimore 8-Hour 

Ozone Nonattainment Area, (vii) the Attainment Demonstration (including modeling and weight of evidence), 

(viii) the 2009 Attainment Year Inventory, (ix) the Contingency Measures for Attainment, and (x) the 2009 

Transportation Conformity Budgets. 

EPA acted to approve, in part, MDE's submittal on June 4, 2010. The approval consisted of first six elements 

listed above. EPA would not approve the portions of the SIP relating to the attainment demonstration, 

concluding that the attainment demonstration, including modeling and the weight of evidence did not project 

attainment by the area's attainment date. Since then the area has monitored attainment of the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS for the 2012-2014 monitoring period. The purpose of this letter is to withdraw the remaining 

portions of June 4, 2007 submittal. 

Specifically, the State of Maryland hereby withdraws (i) the Attainment Demonstration (including modeling 

and weight of evidence), (ii) the 2009 Attainment Year Inventory, (iii) the Contingency Measures for 

Attainment, and (iv) the 2009 Transportation Conformity Budgets, all of which were submitted on June 4, 2007. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Tad Abum, Air Director at 410-537-3255. 

Ben Grumbles 

Secretary 

~ Recycled Paper www .mde.maryland.gov TIY Users l-800-735-2258 

Via Maryland Relay Service
No. 00A531.

#### Jonas *v.*Talley et al.

C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay, addressed to Justice O’Connor and referred to the Court, denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Health Management Systems, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration forms S-3 (File
Nos. 33-91518 and 333-06769), and forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-65560, 33-76770,
33-95326, 33-76638 and 33-33706) of Health Management Systems, Inc. of our
report dated November 21, 1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Health Management Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1996 and
1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
October 31, 1997, and related schedule, which report appears herein.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Short Hills, New Jersey
January 21, 1998