alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10-1.htm






EXHIBIT 10.1












Amendment Number Two


 


To The


 


West Marine, Inc.


 


Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan


 


Pursuant to the power delegated to the Compensation and Leadership Development Committee (“Committee”) of the Board of Directors (“Board”) of West Marine, Inc. (the “Board”), under Section 15 of the Amended and Restated West Marine, Inc. Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan, effective as of May 19, 2011, as amended by Amendment Number One, effective as of March 30, 2012 (collectively, the “Plan”), at a meeting of the Committee held on February 21, 2014, the Committee approved the following second amendment (“Amendment”) to the Plan:







1.


The definition of “Committee” in Section 2.9 of the Plan is amended in part by replacing “governance and compensation committee” with “compensation and leadership development committee.” The balance of the Section remains unmodified.







2.


The definition of “Date of Grant” in Section 2.13 of the Plan is amended by deleting such Section in its entirety and substituting in its place the following:



2.13           “Date of Grant” means:













(a)           for annual Awards to Participants who are current Employees of the Company, the first business day of March of each year; and





 





(b)           for one-time Awards made to Participants who are newly-hired Employees, the 10th business day of the calendar month following the new Employee’s date of hire; and





 





(c)           for one-time Awards made to existing Employee Participants who are promoted and whom the Management Committee or the Committee determines are entitled to receive an Award, the 3rd business day following the release of quarterly earnings which occurs immediately following the effective date of the promotion;  and





 





(d)           for annual Awards made to Non-Employee Directors, the close of each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders at which the Non-Employee Director is nominated for reelection and is so elected by the stockholders; and





 





(e)           for Awards, other than annual Awards, made to Non-Employee Directors appointed by the Board at any time prior to the next annual meeting of stockholders (e.g. an appointment to fill a vacancy on the Board), the first day of attendance by such newly-appointed Non-Employee Director at the first to occur of a Board meeting or a meeting of any of the Board’s standing committees; and





 





(f)           for any other Awards and/or for Awards set forth in subsections (a) through (e) above notwithstanding the dates set forth therein, any date designated by the Committee as the date as of which an Award is granted, which shall not be earlier than the date on which the Committee approves the granting of such Award.








  





  











  


















3.


This Amendment to the Plan shall be effective as of February 20, 2014.







Except as modified by this Amendment, the terms of the Plan remain unmodified and in full force and effect.









	 	 
	 	WEST MARINE, INC.	 
	
 

	/s/ Pamela Fields	 
	 	Pamela Fields, Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NETMED, INC.
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         142,074
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               345,980
<PP&E>                                          60,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,379,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          447,914
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,881,605
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,954,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,379,590
<SALES>                                        102,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,813
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,780,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (664,057)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,013,835)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (421,013)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (592,822)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KONATA MATTHEWS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 466 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KONATA MATTHEWS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 467 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KONATA MATTHEWS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 468 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM
[466 EAL 2021, 467 EAL 2021 and 468 EAL 2021] - 2

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>        JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>       6-MOS


<CAPTION>

                                                         EXHIBIT 27 (a)


                Crown Central Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries
                             Financial Data Schedule
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)



                                                    Six Months Ended
                                                     June 30, 1999
                                                    ----------------
<S>                                                 <C>
<CASH>                                                  $ 6,689
<SECURITIES>                                              5,820
<RECEIVABLES>                                            97,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                               (726)
<INVENTORY>                                              90,213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        204,429
<PP&E>                                                  674,977
<DEPRECIATION>                                          373,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          552,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   219,339
<BONDS>                                                 129,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 50,073
<OTHER-SE>                                              106,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            552,208
<SALES>                                                 506,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        506,578
<CGS>                                                   465,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           465,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         72,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            (13)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        7,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (35,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (12,762)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (22,859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (22,859)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (2.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (2.32)




</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2 Debt Settlement Agreement


Exhibit 10.2




DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT




THIS DEBT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of February 24, 2014 by and between SmartData Corporation  (“SmartData”) whose address is  P.O. Box 1593, Moab, Utah and Burkeley J. Priest (“Priest”), whose address is P.O. Box 1593 Moab, Utah 84532 and Munson Family Limited Partnership (“Munson”), whose address is 3374 Starview Dr. Bend, OR 97701.




WHEREAS, SmartData wishes to settle $97,817.61 in convertible debt, which the parties agree represents all of the outstanding convertible debt owed to Priest and Munson as of February 23, 2014.




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants contained herein, the above recitals and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:




Priest shall receive $19,500 in Cash and a promissory note for $33,341, a copy of which is attached hereto (“Burkeley Note”).




Munson Family Limited Partnership shall receive a promissory note for $16,659, a copy of which is attached hereto (“Munson Note”)




For valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and with the intent to be legally bound hereby, Priest and Munson do hereby release, acquit, and forever discharge SmartData from and does hereby covenant and agree never to institute or cause to be instituted any suit or other form of action or proceeding of any kind or nature whatsoever based upon the Settlement of the Debt against SmartData, its successors and assigns and each of their respective past and present, direct and indirect, subsidiary, parent, and affiliated entities, and to each of their respective past and present employees, agents attorneys in fact, attorneys at law, representatives, officers, directors, shareholders, partners and joint ventures.




This agreement shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Nevada.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, intending to be bound hereby, have executed this agreement as of the date first written above.





		
	SmartData Corporation

	Burkeley J. Priest


	 
	 

	/s/ Bruce Lybbert

	/s/Burkeley J. Priest 


	By: Bruce Lybbert, Director

	By: Burkeley J. Priest


	Munson Family Limited Partnership

	 

	 
	 

	/s/ Gerald Rice

	 

	By: Gerald Rice
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6163

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ARNOLD STUDIVANT,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:15-cr-00164-RDB-1; 1:18-cv-03248-RDB)

Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 21, 2019

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnold Studivant, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arnold Studivant seeks to appeal a district court order that he characterizes as a 

denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Studivant seeks to appeal is neither a final order 

nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order; rather, it merely granted Studivant 

additional time to provide information regarding equitable tolling of the limitations 

period for § 2255 claims. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 22

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

1.   Swift Transportation Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

2.   Swift Leasing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

3.   Common Market Distributing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

4.   Sparks Finance Co., Inc., a Nevada corporation

5.   Cooper Motor Lines, Inc., a South Carolina corporation

6.   Common Market Equipment Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

7.   Swift Transportation Co. of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation

8.   Swift of Texas Co., Inc., a Texas corporation

9.   Swift Logistics Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

10.  Swift Transportation Corporation, a Nevada corporation

11.  Swift Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation
TBAC RECOMMENDED US TREASURY FINANCING SCHEDULE FOR FEBRUARY 2024-APRIL 2024 QUARTER 

* BILLIONS OF DOLLARS

* This financing table is meant to be illustrative based on meeting discussions and does not indicate how Treasury will actually issue debt in the 

future.

** Shaded area indicates actual prior auction sizes provided for reference.

FRN

2-Year 3-Year 5-Year 7-Year 10-Year 20-Year 30-Year 5-Year 10-Year 30-Year 2-Year

Aug-23 45 42 46 36 38 16 23 8 24

Sep-23 48 44 49 37 35 13 20 15 24

Oct-23 51 46 52 38 35 13 20 22 26

Nov-23 54 48 55 39 40 16 24 15 26

Dec-23 57 50 58 40 37 13 21 20 26

Jan-24 60 52 61 41 37 13 21 18 28

Feb-24 63 54 64 42 42 16 25 10 28

Mar-24 66 56 67 43 39 13 22 16 28

Apr-24 69 58 70 44 39 13 22 23 30

May-24 69 58 70 44 42 16 25 16 28

Jun-24 69 58 70 44 39 13 22 21 28

Jul-24 69 58 70 44 39 13 22 18 30

TIPS

Historical Reference

Recommendations for 

this Refunding

Provisional Indications 

for Next Refunding

Auction 

Month

Notes Bonds
#### Dyke SPEAR, D/B/A Broadway Productions v. STATE of Louisiana and City of Lake Charles.

No. 61681.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 27, 1978.

In re: Dyke Spear, d/b/a Broadway Productions applying for writ of review and stay order. Calcasieu Parish.

Writ granted. Failing to have seen the play “Oh! Calcutta,” the trial judge erred in *936granting a preliminary injunction; accordingly, it is ordered that the injunction be vacated and set aside. See La.R.S. 14:106, La.R.S. 13:4711 et seq.

SANDERS, C. J.,

dissents from the granting of the writ. Obscenity is tested by a community standard. The showing made is insufficient to justify disturbing the ruling of the trial judge.

SUMMERS, J.,

dissents. Based upon the community standards the trial judge in that community found “Oh! Calcutta!” to be an exhibition of hard core sexual conduct. In doing so he applied the requirements established by law. I therefore dissent from the granting of this writ and would not disturb the ruling of the trial judge. This court’s action is taken without a review of the evidence.
#### STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Petitioner, v. Federico Sainz de la MAZA, Respondent.

No. 73-1368.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 27, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Janice LIVAS.

No. 62532.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: Janice Livas applying for writs of certiorari, review, prohibition, mandamus and for a stay order. Parish of Orleans # 263-539.

Writ denied.
#### John Willie LESTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. S-363.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 12, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Andrew W. Lindsey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Speights v. State, 244 So.2d 530 (Fla.App.1971).

CARROLL, DONALD IC., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 29 (Wednesday, February 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3612]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meeting

TYPE: Quarterly Meeting.

AGENCY: National Council on Disability.

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and proposed agenda of the 
forthcoming quarterly meeting of the National Council on Disability. 
Notice of this meeting is required under Section 522b(e)(1) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, P.L. 94-409).

DATES: March 23-24, 1997, 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

LOCATION: Sheraton Uptown Albuquerque Hotel, 2600 Louisiana Boulevard, 
NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110; 505-881-3736.

FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark S. Quigley, Public Affairs Specialist, National Council on 
Disability, 1331 F Street NW., Suite 1050, Washington, DC 20004-1107; 
(202) 272-2004 (Voice), 272-2074 (TT), (202) 272-2022 (Fax); 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f120e0a1618131a063f1c111b51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6bba7a3bfb1bab3af96b5b8b2f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a> (e-mail).

AGENCY MISSION: The National Council on Disability is an independent 
federal agency comprised of 15 members appointed by the President of 
the United States and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Its overall purpose 
is to promote policies, programs, practices, and procedures that 
guarantee equal opportunity for all people with disabilities, 
regardless of the nature or severity of the disability; and to empower 
people with disabilities to achieve economic self-sufficiency, 
independent living, and inclusion and integration into all aspects of 
society.

ACCOMMODATIONS: Those needing interpreters or other accommodations 
should notify the National Council on Disability prior to this meeting.

ENVIRONMENTAL ILLNESS: People with environmental illness must reduce 
their exposure to volatile chemical substances in order to attend this 
meeting. In order to reduce such exposure, we ask that you not wear 
perfumes or scents at the meeting. We also ask that you smoke only in 
designated areas and the privacy of your room. Smoking is prohibited in 
the meeting room and surrounding area.

OPEN MEETING: This quarterly meeting of the National Council on 
Disability shall be open to the public.

AGENDA: The proposed agenda includes:

Reports from the Chairperson and the Executive Director
Committee Meetings and Committee Reports
Strategic Planning
Unfinished Business
New Business
Announcements
Adjournment

    Records shall be kept of all National Council on Disability 
proceedings and shall be available after the meeting for public 
inspection at the National Council on Disability.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on February 3, 1997.
Ethel D. Briggs,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-3612 Filed 2-10-97; 3:23 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of GENESIS  COMPANIES GROUP, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Madhava  Rao Mankal,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Madhava Rao Mankal
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Madhava Rao Mankal,  CFO

Dated:  September 29, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68267-68268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33977]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Domestic Preparedness 
Hotline User Survey; No Form; OMB Number 0702-[to be determined].
    Type of Request: New Collection.
    Number of Respondents: 600.
    Responses Per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 600.
    Average Burden Per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 150.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain information from users regarding the features of a hotline 
for reporting instances of chemical, biological, or weapons of mass 
destruction. Respondents are firefighters, hazardous materials 
responders, emergency medical services, and emergency planners/managers 
from 150 metropolitan areas in the U.S. They are the intended hotline 
user group. The purpose of this information collection is to obtain 
input from this user group on the features they would like to have 
incorporated into a hotline for reporting emergencies of a chemical, 
biological, or weapons of mass destruction nature.
    Affected Public: State, Local, or Tribal Government.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. Edward C. Springer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Springer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Robert Cushing.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Mr. Cushing, WHS/DIOR,

[[Page 68268]]

1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302.

    Dated: December 2, 1997.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 97-33977 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-01-M