alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit  32.1**

**CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002**

In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Datascope Corp. (the ”Company”)  for the Quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | **•** | the          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | **•** | the          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of          the Company. |
|--------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

November  9, 2006

 

|   |   |   | /s/          Lawrence Saper                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |  

 

 

Lawrence          SaperChairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

/s/          Scott D. Kantor

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott          D. KantorVice President, Finance and Administration,and Chief Financial Officer

  |
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7088 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.7088

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, as the ``Senator Jack Hill Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SENATOR JACK HILL POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Senator Jack Hill Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Senator 
Jack Hill Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
254 La. 841

#### Reverend Manno M. SNYDER v. AUTOMOBILE OWNERS SAFETY INSURANCE COMPANY and Standard Life & Accident Insurance Company.

No. 50086.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Reverend Manno M. Snyder applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 225 So.2d 275.

Writs refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Corey Thomas Williams, Appellant

No. 06-18-00089-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 264th District Court of 

Bell County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 72868). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Corey Thomas Williams, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 1, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 32****Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 905of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended December 31, 2006 as filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of hisor her knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.Date:February 28, 2007      /s/ Robert W. Cunningham  Robert W. Cunningham  Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)     /s/ Glynis A. Bryan  Glynis A. Bryan  Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)   This certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not be deemed filed by the Registrant as part of the Annual Report in Form 1
76
## Faulk.Scott (OSn
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:

Dear Dennis and Scott, Andrew Bonney <Andrew.Bonney@capeair.com> Wednesday, September 1B,2013 11:39 PM Faulk, Scott (OSn; Devany, Dennis (OSn Jamie Kogutek Montana transition update: Dec.9/10 

# .~:':'''p''r')"R-T'AT'I~O'f.1 :,:~,~:) l. t\ I~ 

# '_~;G OPERATiONS lOIJ Imv !q 

## P 1.1: 

## 'b

With my sincere appreciation to Jamie Kogutek at Silver for his patience while we at Cape Air worked out our Montana start-up plan, and with hisconsultation and input on transition date, we have agreed to transition the Montana service on December 9/10, 2013. So, Silver will fly their schedule through December 9, and Cape Air will start on the morning of December 10. let me know if Ican answer any questions about this plan. Cheers, 

### Andrew Bonney Vice PresidentofPlanning Cape Air 660 Barnstable Rd. Hyannis. MA 02601 0: 508 862.9719/ C: 508 648.5911/ F: 508 957.6919 andrew. bonney@capeair.com

1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Santos Cornelio Morenito, Also Known as Cornelio Sosa, Appellant.

[722 NYS2d 841]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that, because the People failed to file a CPL 710.30 notice, Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to preclude a Rochester police officer from *929testifying that, when he heard defendant’s voice following defendant’s arrest, he recognized it as a voice he heard in many of the telephone conversations intercepted pursuant to an eavesdropping warrant. We disagree. The identification of defendant’s voice by a trained police officer who had become familiar with it while monitoring over 150 telephone calls over a 20-day period was confirmatory and therefore not subject to the notice requirement of CPL 710.30 *(see, People v Deleon,*273 AD2d 27, 28, *lv denied*95 NY2d 933). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that he was denied due process by the substitution of the Trial Justice during jury deliberations *(see, People v Artist,*95 NY2d 793), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see,*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bender, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 1st Degree.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Scudder, Burns and Lawton, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7109 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7109

 To rescind certain amounts appropriated to the Department of Justice 
             for fiscal year 2020, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2020

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rescind certain amounts appropriated to the Department of Justice 
             for fiscal year 2020, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IN GENERAL.

    Of the unobligated amounts available under the heading ``Department 
of Justice--General Administration--Salaries and Expenses'' in division 
B of Public Law 116-93, $50,000,000 is hereby rescinded and shall be 
deposited in the Treasury for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Department of Justice /

-^^y~w~~~~~~ ~Antitrust Division _

Liberty Place Building

325 Seventh Street NW

Washington, DC 20530

June 25, 1999

Mr. Mark Ginsburg

Deputy Assistant Secretary

Office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Department of Energy

Washington, D.C. 20585

Re: Energy Policy and Conservation Act

Dear Mr. Ginsburg:

On May 14, 1999, you wrote asking our views regarding the "lessening of competition"

language in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended. That provision, found at 42

U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(B)(I)(v), requires that, before adopting an energy conservation standard, DOE

consider the views of the Attorney General on whether the proposed standard is likely to result

in any lessening of competition. You specifically asked if our evaluation of the effect on

competition of new standards relating to electric and gas water heaters would include

consideration of the effects on competition between gas and electric utility industries or within

either industry.

The Antitrust Division's review of the competitive impact of a proposed standard is not

necessarily limited to a single market. In making our evaluation of the likely effect of a

proposed standard on competition, we would consider not only evidence of the effect on

competition among water heater manufacturers, but also information relating to the likely effect

on competition among energy suppliers. For example, in the event that a proposed appliance

standard would harm competition among fuel suppliers, resulting in higher prices for fuels, such

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 102
»-- » -

information would be relevant to our analysis. However, as with our analysis of the impact of a

proposed standard on competition among heater manufacturers, our focus would be the effect on

the overall level of market competition, not on individual fuel suppliers or on shifts in consumer

usage among alternate fuels.

If you have any further questions, please let me know.

Sincerely,

Roger W. Fones

Chief

Transportation, Energy and

Agriculture Section

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 102
#### Patrick R. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-672.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 13, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                               Section 906 of the
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

            The undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of Escalon Medical Corp. (the "Company"), that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  April 10, 2003                           /s/  Harry M. Rimmer
     --------------------                       --------------------
                                                Harry M. Rimmer
                                                Senior Vice President - Finance
                                                (Principal Financial and
                                                Accounting Officer)
#### H. L. PIERCE v. J. B. PARSONS.

No. 45918.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 19, 1970.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 9, 1970.

Zachary, Weldy & Ingram, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

William V. Murry, Hattiesburg, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Alan Ross MINCHER, a minor, by his father and next friend, Joseph E. Mincher, and Joseph E. Mincher, Individually, Appellants, v. MIDWEST MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 73-705.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1974.

Robert J. Ritter, Miami, for appellants.

Hawkesworth, Kay & Schmick, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lopez v. Midwest Mutual Insurance Company, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 550.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Andres Esteban MACARENO, Appellee.

No. 70-383.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 1, 1970.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Richard E. Gerstein, State’s Atty., and Joseph Durant, Asst. State’s Atty., for appellant.

Meyer M. Brilliant and Franklin D. Kreutzer, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); Monserrate v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 444; and Spataro v. State, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 873.
Exhibit 35.3



LOGO

SUBSERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

SALLIE MAE, INC.

12061 Bluemont Way

Reston, VA 20190

Pursuant to Section 13.03 of the Omnibus
Subservicing Agreement dated March 23, 2009 among Great Lakes Educational Loan Services, Inc. (Subservicer), Sallie Mae, Inc. as the master servicer and administrator (the Servicing Agreement), the undersigned certifies
that (a) a review of the Subservicers activities during the period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision; and (b) to the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligation under the Servicing Agreement, in all material respects, during such period.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.
|                                           
|/s/ Jill M. Leitl                          
|Jill M. Leitl                              
|Chief Servicing Officer                    
|                                           
|February 5, 2014                           



|                                                                                                                                         |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                                                                                         |  | 
|GREAT LAKES EDUCATIONAL LOAN SERVICES, INC.
2401 INTERNATIONAL LANE | MADISON, WI 53704-3192 PHONE:
608.246.1800 | WEB: MYGREATLAKES.ORG |  |
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Brett  Meinsen,  Vice President - Finance and  Administration,  Secretary and
  Treasurer of Reinhold  Industries,  Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies
  that to the best of his knowledge:

1.       The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
         2004 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
         Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated

The  foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.



/s/ BRETT MEINSEN
Brett Meinsen
Vice President - Finance and Administration,
Secretary, Treasurer
March 30, 2005



A signed copy of this written statement required by section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
                Certification of Principal Executive Officer and
                    Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350



In connection with the Form 10-Q (the "Report") of Continental Global Group,
                       ---------                   --------------------------
                    [Name of Report]               [Name of Company]

Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending September 30, 2003, we
----                                       ------------------
                                                [Date]

Robert W. Hale, President, and J.L. Dickinson, Vice President, of the Company,
--------------  ---------      --------------  --------------
[Name of Officer][Title]       [Name of Officer]  [Title]

certify that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


/s/ Robert W. Hale                            /s/ J. L. Dickinson
--------------------------------              --------------------------------
Robert W. Hale, President                     J. L. Dickinson, Vice President

Dated:  November 19, 2003


Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Memo

Financing Marketable All Other Change in End-Of-Quarter

Need Borrowing Sources Total Cash Balance Cash Balance

Quarter Announcement Date (1) (2) (3) (4) = (2) + (3) (5) = (4) - (1) (6)

Oct - Dec --- --- --- --- --- ---

2005 Actual 97 93 6 98 1 37

Memo: Forecast Revision --- --- --- --- --- ---

Jan - Mar

2006 Actual 173 158 (14) 144 (28) 8

Memo: Forecast Revision --- --- --- --- --- ---

Apr - Jun May 1, 2006 (76) (51) (8) (59) 17 25

2006 Actual (137) (92) (7) (99) 38 46

Memo: Forecast Revision (61) (41) 1 (40) 21 21

Jul - Sep May 1, 2006 78 89 (6) 83 5 30

2006 July 31, 2006 23 30 (17) 13 (11) 35

Memo: Forecast Revision (55) (59) (12) (71) (16) 5

Oct - Dec

2006 July 31, 2006 106 104 (9) 96 (10) 25

Memo: Forecast Revision --- --- --- --- --- ---

Notes: All data reported on a cash basis ($ billions)

Sources and Uses Reconciliation Table

Financing
#### Donald B. BARMACK, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 43830.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 22, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 18, 1973.

Certiorari denied. 276 So.2d 247.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ADKINS and McCAIN, JJ., dissent.
#### H. Delmas WYNN, Appellant, v. WINSEN, LTD., et al., Appellees.

No. 70-632.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 2, 1971.

*640Reid Moore, Jr., Palm Beach, for appellant.

J. B. Booher, of Booher & McGrotty, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Winsen, Ltd.

PER CURIAM.

By interlocutory appeal we are asked to review an order denying appellant Wynn’s motion for summary judgment as to Count II of the complaint.

The complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages. Count I alleged that the defendants, acting pursuant to a conspiracy, carried into effect a scheme to defraud the plaintiff of its assets by the device of gaining control over the corporate affairs and diverting its assets to the defendants’ personal use. Count II was essentially identical with the additional allegation that the defendants had gained control of the plaintiff corporation through fraudulent means. Although the complaint prayed that the defendants be enjoined from filing suits against the plaintiff, the cause of action was and remains simply a tort action for damages rather than an action formerly cognizable in equity. As such, the order denying defendant Wynn’s motion for summary judgment on Count II is not reviewable under Rule 4.2, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. It may be reviewed upon full appeal from final judgment if properly assigned as error.

The appeal is dismissed.

CROSS, C. J., and OWEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.
#### Jerry Lewis BENNETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-554.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 1, 1970.

Hughlan Long, Public Defender, and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Melvin Grossman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.
#### William O. WILCOX, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1179.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 28, 1974.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
258 La. 577

#### Mrs. Gall GUILLOT, widow of Curtis J. PLAISANCE, now wife of Ernest ARABIE v. ATLAS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Inc.

No. 51354.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1971.

In re: Atlas Life Insurance Company, Inc. applying for certiorari, or writ of *395review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 245 So.2d 788.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
256 La. 903

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Lloyd COOK v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50917.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1970.

In re: Lloyd Cook applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made in the application does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
#### William E. MARKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-459.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 13, 1972.

J. Stephen Gardner, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard C. Booth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

*47PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Terry v. Ohio, 1967, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889; Fla. Stat. § 901.151, F.S.A. (1971).

HOBSON, A. C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.