alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



I, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
     June 29, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2003


                                     /s/ E. Randall Chestnut
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board,
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33818]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 1997 / 
Notices

[[Page 67824]]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


San Juan Fuels Management, Wildlife Habitat Management, and 
Timber Harvest Projects

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Revised Notice; Intent to prepare environmental impact 
statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service is preparing an environmental impact 
statement (EIS) for a proposal to implement a Fuels and Wildlife 
improvement project on the Nevada County Ranger District. This project 
intends to utilize vegetative manipulation, biomass removal, and 
prescribed fire to lower existing fire hazards and improve wildlife 
habitat in the project area. Some timber will be harvested to help 
accomplish desired levels of crown closures and spacing of standing 
trees. The Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement was published in the Federal Register on Wednesday, March 12, 
1997 [Volume 62, Number 48, Page 11413-11414]. That Notice announced 
the project name as San Juan Wildlife and Fuels Improvement Projects; 
now, the name has been changed to San Juan Fuels Management, Wildlife 
Habitat Management, and Timber Harvest Projects.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action and environmental impact statement 
should be directed to Donn Thane, San Juan Project Coordinator, 631 
Coyote Street, Nevada City, CA 95959, phone (916) 265-4531.

    Dated: December 15, 1997.
Judie L. Tartaglia,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-33818 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67893-67894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33826]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Pursuant to the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. 9601 
et seq., in United States v. Alfa-Laval, Inc., et al.

    In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (``CERCLA''), as 
amended, 42 U.S.C. 122(i), and Department policy, 28 CFR 50.7, 38 FR 
19029, notice is hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United 
States v. Alfa-Laval, Inc., et. al., Civil Action No. 97-8670, was 
lodged in the United States District Court for the Southern District of 
New York on November 21, 1997. The proposed consent decree, if entered, 
will resolve the liability of Alfa-Laval, Inc. and Theodore S. Losee, 
Sr., (collectively, ``Defendants''), under Sections 106 and 107(a) of 
CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a), in connection with alleged releases 
of hazardous substances at the Jones Sanitation Superfund Site 
(``Site''), a 57-acre parcel located near the intersection of Crum 
Elbow Road and Cardinal Road in Hyde Park, Dutchess County, New York. 
Under the settlement reflected in the proposed consent decree, Alfa-
Laval, Inc. will perform remedial design/remedial action work at the 
Site implementing the Record of Decision issued March 31, 1997 and pay 
response costs of up to $535,000 to the United States. Theodore Losee 
will provide access and

[[Page 67894]]

institutional controls in connection with the Site.
    The Department of Justice will receive, for a period of thirty (30) 
days from the date of publication of this notice, written comments 
relating to the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed 
to Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General of the Environment and 
Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, 
Washington, D.C. 20530, and should refer to United States v. Alfa-
Laval, Inc., et al., Department of Justice No. 90-11-3-1221.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Office of the 
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, 100 
Church Street, 19th Floor, New York, New York 10007; at Region I office 
of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New 
York, New York 10007; and at the Consent Decree Library, 1120 G Street, 
N.W., 4th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005, 202-624-0892. A copy of the 
proposed Consent Decree may be obtained in person or by mail from the 
Consent Decree Library, at the above address. In requesting a copy, 
please enclose a check in the amount of $24.24 (25 cents per page 
reproduction costs) payable to Consent Decree Library.
Walker B. Smith,
Deputy Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section Environment and Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 97-33826 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
<PAGE>



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-61292, No. 33-61294, No. 33-67298, No. 333-3430 and No. 333-11899 of Sullivan
Dental Products, Inc. on Forms S-8, Registration Statements No. 33-61284, No.
33-67294, No. 33-91962 and No. 333-3428 of Sullivan Dental Products, Inc. on
Forms S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-11901 of Sullivan Dental Products,
Inc. on Form S-4 of our reports dated February 18, 1997, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Sullivan Dental Products, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1996.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 24, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33559]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New York Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the New York Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 9:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 12:30 p.m. on Thursday, January 22, 1998, at the 
Graduate School and University Center of City University of New York, 
President's Conference Room, 18th Floor, 33 West 42nd Street, New York, 
NY 10011. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the police-community 
relations briefing and the section 8 housing report.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact Committee Chairperson M.D. Taracido, 
212-645-8999, or Ki-Taek Chun, Director of the Eastern Regional Office, 
202-376-7533 (TDD 202-376-8116). Hearing-impaired persons who will 
attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) 
working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 16, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-33559 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2324 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2800 South Adams Street in Tallahassee, Florida, as the ‘‘D. Edwina 

Stephens Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2021 

Mr. LAWSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. DUNN, Mrs. CAMMACK, 

Mr. RUTHERFORD, Mr. WALTZ, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. POSEY, 

Mr. SOTO, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. 

CRIST, Ms. CASTOR of Florida, Mr. C. SCOTT FRANKLIN of Florida, Mr. 

STEUBE, Mr. MAST, Mr. DONALDS, Mr. HASTINGS, Ms. LOIS FRANKEL

of Florida, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. WILSON of 

Florida, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. GIMENEZ, and Ms. SALAZAR) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2800 South Adams Street in Tallahassee, 

Florida, as the ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. D. EDWINA STEPHENS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 2800 South Adams Street in TalVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:46 May 26, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2324.IH H2324

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2324 IH

1 lahassee, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens 

7 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3290]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-217-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

February 5, 1997.
    Take notice that on January 30, 1997, Florida Gas Transmission 
Company (FGT), 1400 Smith Street, Houston, Texas, 77002, filed in the 
above docket, a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 and 157.212 of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for authorization to 
construct a new delivery point under FGT's blanket certificate issued 
in Docket No. CP82-553-000 pursuant to Section 7(c), all as more fully 
set forth in the request that is on file with the Commission and open 
to public inspection.
    Specifically, FGT proposes to construct a new tee, valve, less than 
100 feet of 8-inch connecting lateral and EFM equipment in Pinellas 
County, Florida, to accommodate gas deliveries to FPC's proposed meter 
station to receive interruptible gas volumes. FPC has requested FGT to 
construct a new delivery point in Pinellas County, Florida, to connect 
to the Bartow-B Meter Station that FPC will construct in Pinellas 
County, Florida. FGT states that FPC would reimburse it for all 
construction costs; estimated to be $80,362. FGT proposes to deliver up 
to 2,600 MMBtu of gas per hour at line pressure. Initial deliveries 
will be approximately 1,300 MMBtu per hour. FPC proposes to construct, 
own and operate the meter station and approximately 450 feet of 10-
inch; 75 feet of 8-inch; and 150 feet of 6-inch pipe of non-
jurisdiction pipeline connecting the meter station to FPC Bartow Plant.
    FGT states that the natural gas volumes delivered to this delivery 
point will be interruptible volumes and therefore will not disadvantage 
FGT's other existing customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request.
    If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, the 
proposed activity is deemed to be authorized effective on the day after 
the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and not 
withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a protest, 
the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3290 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### TRI PAR LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Carl W. HENTHORN, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-45.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 4, 1970.

Robert J. Boylston, of Goodrich, Hampton & Boylston, Bradenton, for appellant.

William E. Getzen, of Williams, Parker, Harrison, Dietz & Getzen, Sarasota, for appellees.

HOBSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a final judgment entered in the court below upon remand to that court after an appeal to this court. *430This court’s opinion in the prior appeal is reported as Henthorn v. Tri Par Land Development Corporation, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 465. The covenants involved in this cause are quoted in the prior opinion and therefore need not be repeated here. Suffice it to say that in the prior opinion we held that the covenants were not perpetual and therefore reversed the trial court which had held the covenants invalid as it had found them to be perpetual. The *sole*question before us previously was whether or not the covenants were perpetual.

In the trial court the plaintiff, Tri Par, in attempting- to invalidate wholly or partially the covenants, filed its complaint on two theories. The first was that the covenants were perpetual and therefore invalid. This theory was laid to rest by our prior opinion. The second theory was that there was a partial impossibility of performance and therefore the covenants were either wholly or partially invalid.

Upon remand of the prior appeal the trial court held that it was powerless to adjudicate the second theory urged by the plaintiff, Tri Par, because this court had ruled that Tri Par was required to carry out the terms of the covenants and the trial court was bound by that ruling. However, the trial court in its final judgment held further that if it were not true that it was powerless to rule on Tri Par’s second theory it would find that there was no legal impossibility of performance of the covenants. Such a finding is amply supported by the record on appeal.

We hold that our prior opinion did not prevent the trial court from ruling on the second theory advanced by Tri Par. It is clear from the trial court’s final judgment that there is no necessity to remand this cause for a determination of the remaining theory, as the trial court has already spoken to the effect that it has found no legal impossibility of performance.

In view of this we hold that the final judgment of the trial court ordering the plaintiff, Tri Par, to comply with the terms of the covenants is correct and, therefore,

Affirm.

LILES and MANN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 24.1  POWER OF ATTORNEY OF JERRY BAKER.

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Know all by these presents, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and 
appoints each of W. Scott Webber and Thomas Vanneman, signing singly, his/her 
true and lawful attorney-in-fact to:

    (1)  execute for and on behalf of the undersigned Forms 3, 4 and 5 and in
    accordance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
    the rules thereunder;

    (2)  do and perform any and all acts for and on behalf of the undersigned
    which may be necessary or desirable to complete the execution of any such
    Form 3, 4 or 5 and the timely filing of such form with the United States
    Securities and Exchange Commission and any other authority; and

    (3)  take any other action of any type whatsoever in connection with the
    foregoing which, in the opinion of such attorney-in-fact, may be of benefit
    to, in the best interest of, or legally required by, the undersigned, it
    being understood that the documents executed by such attorney-in-fact on
    behalf of the undersigned pursuant to this Power of Attorney shall be in
    such form and shall contain such terms and conditions as such attorney-in-
    fact may approve in his/her discretion.

    The undersigned hereby grants to each such attorney-in-fact full power and
authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever requisite,
necessary and proper to be done in the exercise of any of the rights and powers
herein granted, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorney-in-fact shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this power
of attorney and the rights and powers herein granted.  The undersigned
acknowledges that the foregoing attorneys-in-fact, in serving in such capacity
at the request of the undersigned, are not assuming any of the undersigned's
responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Power of Attorney to be
executed this 26 day of FEBRUARY, 1997.


                                       /s/
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Signature

                                               Jerry Baker
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Print Name







                                     42
The Connecticut Light and Power CompanyExhibit 12Ratio of Earnings to Fixed ChargesNine Months(In thousands)EndedSeptember 30, 2008Year Ended December 31,Earnings, as defined:(unaudited)20072006200520042003Net income$147,858$133,564$200,007$94,845$88,016$68,908Income tax expense/(benefit)55,00652,353(43,961)32,17445,53918,135Equity in (earnings)/losses of regional nucleargenerating companies(283)(1,901)854(1,153)(568)(1,776)Dividends received from regional equity investees-2,5961,4074122,5776,359Fixed charges, as below124,165155,557131,923133,321119,857119,550Less: Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)(10,020)(10,924)(6,610)(6,719)(3,110)(2,976)Total earnings, as defined$316,726$331,245$283,620$252,880$252,311$208,200Fixed charges, as defined:Interest on long-term debt (a)$77,052$84,292$64,873$59,019$43,308$39,815Interest on rate reduction bonds22,80837,72846,69255,79663,66770,284Other interest (b)9,63516,4136,2815,2203,072508Rental interest factor4,6506,2007,4676,5676,7005,967Interest capitalized (including AFUDC)10,02010,9246,6106,7193,1102,976Total fixed charges, as defined$124,165$155,557$131,923$133,321$119,857$119,550Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges2.552.132.151.902.111.74(a) Interest on long-term debt amounts include amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness.(b) For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and for the year ended December 31, 2007, other interest includes interest expense related to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109."
United States Navy–Marine Corps

Court of Criminal Appeals

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Rocky RODRIGUEZ

Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 201800265

Decided: 8 February 2019

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.

Military Judge: 

Lieutenant Colonel Eugene H. Robinson, Jr., USMC

Sentence adjudged 11 May 2018 by a general court-martial convened 

at Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan, consisting of a military judge sitting 

alone. Sentence approved by convening authority: a reprimand, reduction to E-1, confinement for 5 years,1 and a dishonorable discharge.

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Colonel Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.

For Appellee:

Brian Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

Before WOODARD, TANG, and LAWRENCE, 

Appellate Military Judges.

 

1 The Convening Authority suspended confinement in excess of 30 months pursuant to a pretrial agreement. 
United States v. Rodriguez, No. 201800265

2

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s 

substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§

859(a), 866(c).

The findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority are 

AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1290

PETER KALOS; VERON LEE KALOS,

Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

SHANNON J. POSNER; SHANNON J. POSNER, P.A.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:10-cv-00073-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Kalos; Vernon Lee Kalos, Appellants Pro Se. Matthew Allan 

Ranck, ECCLESTON & WOLF PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellees. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Peter and Vernon Lee Kalos appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing the Kalos’ complaint with prejudice as barred 

by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Kalos v. Posner, No. 

1:10-cv-00073-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 23, 2011 & entered 

Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED