1

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT

Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Volatile Organic Compounds 

(VOC) Sources – Houston Galveston Brazoria (HGB) 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment 

Area

EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0100
2

This TSD concerns our review of the RACT-related provisions of the 30 TAC Chapter115 for 

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This TSD reviews portions of two different SIP 

submittals from Texas. Specifically, the first submittal is Texas’ State Implementation Plan (SIP)

revision dated June 13, 2007, and the second one is Texas’ SIP submittal of April 6, 2010. No 

material in either of these two SIP submittals was designated as Confidential Business 

Information (CBI). In this TSD, we are reviewing control requirements of certain industrial 

sectors from the materials presented in Appendices D of the June 13, 2007, and April 6, 2010 

SIP submittals titled “Reasonably Available Control Technology Analysis.”

The EPA had previously approved RACT for VOC and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) into Texas’ 

SIP under the 1-Hour ozone standard. On April 2, 2013 (78 FR 19599) we finalized approval of 

RACT for several VOC emitting sectors in the HGB area under the 1997 8-Hour ozone National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). In this document, we are addressing those remaining 

portions of the SIP submittals concerning the following CTG categories for RACT purposes in 

the HGB 8-Hour ozone nonattainment area. This action addresses the CTG categories that were 

not included in the April 2, 2013 (78 FR 19599) rulemaking action and are listed in Table A. 

Table A below summarizes the affected source categories in the HGB area, CTG documents 

issued by EPA, and the corresponding Texas rules which address these particular CTG control 

requirements. We are also proposing approval of the negative declarations for source categories 

that Texas reports do not exist or operate in the HGB Area for the 1997 8-Hour ozone standard.

The RACT for the more recently EPA-issued CTG series (2006-2008 CTGs) is not subject of 

this rulemaking action, and EPA will be acting on those sectors in a separate rulemaking action. 

Table A: Listing of CTG Categories, EPA Reference Document, and Corresponding Texas rules

Entry # Source Category 

in HGB Area

CTG Reference Document Chapter 115, 

Fulfilling 

RACT

1 Aerospace Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Coating Operations at 

Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework

Operations, EPA-453/R-97-004-1997/12

§115.420 - 429

2 Surface coating 

for insulation of 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from 

Existing Stationary Sources – Volume IV: 

§115.420 – 429
3

Entry # Source Category 

in HGB Area

CTG Reference Document Chapter 115, 

Fulfilling 

RACT

magnets Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire, 

EPA-450/2-77-033-1977/12

3 Surface coating 

of coils

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, 

Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks, EPA450/2-77-008-1977/05

§115.420 - 429

4 Surface coating 

of fabrics

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, 

Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks, EPA450/2-77-008-1977/05

§115.420 – 429

5 Surface coating 

of cans

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, 

Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks, EPA450/2-77-008-1977/05

§115.420 - 429 

6 Use of cutback 

asphalt

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from 

Use of Cutback Asphalt, EPA-450/2-77-037-

1977/12

§115.510 – 519

7 Wood furniture Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing 

Operations, EPA-453/R-96-007-1996/04

§115.420 – 429

8 Large petroleum 

dry cleaners 

Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners, 

EPA-450/3-82-009-1982/09

§115.552 – 559 

The corresponding sections of Chapter 115 for each sector are identified in Table A above, and 

will be evaluated later in this document.

What EPA document contains guidance concerning relationship of the 1-Hour RACT and 

the 1997 8-Hour RACT?

The May 18, 2006 Memorandum from William T. Harnett, Director, Air Quality Policy Division 

to Regional Air Division Directors titled “RACT Qs & As – Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT): Questions and Answers” (EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document) 

explains the relationship of the 1-Hour RACT and the 1997 8-Hour RACT in the form of a series 

of questions and answers. This document is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t1/memoranda/ractqanda.pdf (URL dating June 12, 2012).

What Framework did Texas use to conduct its RACT analysis? 
4

Texas submitted a RACT assessment in its SIP revisions of June 13, 2007 and April 6, 2010. In 

those submittals, Texas evaluated its existing RACT regulations which were federally approved 

and adopted to meet the 1-hour ozone standard to ascertain whether these regulations constitute 

RACT for the new 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Texas’ 8-Hour ozone RACT SIP submittals are based 

on the determination that RACT has been met either through a certification that previously 

required RACT controls for the 1-hour ozone standard represent RACT for 8-hour ozone 

implementation purposes or, where necessary, through a new RACT evaluation for certain 

regulations or sources. See section 3.3.2 of Appendix D, April 6, 2010 submittal. In making its 

8-Hour ozone RACT determination, Texas also relied on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A

document. See section 3.3 of Appendix D, April 6, 2010 submittal. Accordingly, the framework 

for Texas’ RACT SIP determination is to:

• Identify all source categories covered by Control Technique Guidelines (CTG) and 

Alternative Control Technique (ACT) documents.

• Identify applicable regulations that implement RACT.

• Certify that the existing level of controls established for the 1-hour ozone standard 

satisfies RACT under the 8-hour ozone standard, or

• Declare that sources covered by a CTG and ACT do not exist within the state and/or 

that RACT is not applicable in certain cases, or

• Identify potential RACT revisions necessary to implement RACT.

For what source categories, in the HGB Area, did Texas announce a negative declaration?

In Table D of its April 6, 2010 submittal Texas also declared that the Fiberglass Boat 

Manufacturing Materials (see section 3.3.4.2 of RACT discussion, April 6, 2010 submittal) 

Operations, Leather Tanning and Finishing Operations (SIC 3111), Surface Coating for Flat 

Wood Paneling (see section 3.3.2.1 of RACT discussion, April 6, 2010 submittal) Operations, 

Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coating (see section 3.3.4 of RACT discussion, 

April 6, 2010 submittal) Operations, and Vegetable Oil Manufacturing Operations (SIC 2046 and 

2076) do not exist or are not major sources in the HGB Area. As such, TCEQ does not have to 

adopt VOC regulations for these source categories at this time for the HGB Area for 1997 8-
5

Hour ozone standard. However, if a major source of this category locates in the HGB Area in 

future, then TCEQ will need to take appropriate regulatory measures for SIP purposes. We are 

proposing to approve Texas’ negative declaration for these source categories. 

As a part of 77 FR 58063 (September 19, 2012) RACT rulemaking action we approved a 

negative declaration for the Rubber Tire Manufacturing Operations (SIC 3011) in the HGB Area. 

This September 19, 2012 RACT action was a consent decree driven rulemaking. The 77 FR 

58063 action was finalized at 78 FR 19599 (April 2, 2013). 

What is our review of Texas’ RACT analysis?

By approving RACT under the 1-Hour ozone standard (70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005; and 71 

FR 52676, September 6, 2006) we found that control measures in 30 TAC Chapter 115 meet the 

lowest emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by the application of 

control technology that is reasonably available, considering technological and economic 

feasibility. EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document recommends a State certify after 

review that its regulations continue to represent RACT for the 1997 8-Hour ozone NAAQS. The

certification approach is in agreement with the 70 FR 71612, November 29, 2008 (Final Rule to 

Implement the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS). 

Each individual entry from the above Table A is discussed below.

1 Aerospace Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Coating Operations at 

Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework

Operations, EPA-453/R-97-004-1997/12

§115.420 – 429

Section 115.420 defines terms used in surface coating operations. Such definitions provide for 

consistency in application and enforcement of the rules. 

Section 115.421 concerns the VOC content of coatings which are applied to aerospace vehicles 

or components must not exceed the following limits established in paragraphs 11A and 11B. 

Section 115.422 requires the following application techniques to be used when applying any 

primer or topcoat to aerospace vehicles or components: flow/ curtain coating; dip coating; roll 

coating; brush coating; cotton-tipped swab application; electro-deposition coating; HVLP 

spraying; electrostatic spraying; or other coating application methods that achieve emission 

reductions equivalent to high-volume low-pressure (HVLP) or electrostatic spray application 
6

methods. In addition, cleaning solvents used in hand-wipe cleaning operations must meet the 

definition of aqueous cleaning solvent (see §115.420(b)(1)(I)) or need to have a VOC composite 

vapor pressure less than or equal to 45 mm Hg at 20 degrees Celsius. These emission 

specifications will facilitate compliance determination.

Section 115.423 provides for an alternative means control for surface coating operations. 

Emissions calculations shall be based on the pounds of volatile organic compounds (VOC) 

per gallon of solids for all affected coatings. This section provides for operational flexibility 

for operations.

Section 115.424 establishes that the owner or operator of each surface coating process must 

provide samples, without charge, upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or local air pollution control agency. In addition, the representative or inspector requesting the 

sample will determine the amount of coating needed to test the sample to determine compliance. 

This section promotes a source compliant operation.

Section 115.425 establishes what test methods are to be used for testing requirements of the 

surface coating operations. Among these methods include: Test Method 24 (40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) 60, Appendix A) with a one-hour bake; ASTM Test Methods D 1186-06.01, 

D 1200-06.01, D 3794-06.01, D 2832-69, D 1644-75, and D 3960-81; EPA guidelines series 

document “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emitted 

by Paint, Ink, and Other Coatings,” EPA-450/3-84-019, as in effect December, 1984; and 

additional test procedures described in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 60.446. Adoption 

of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally enforceable mechanism for Chapter 

115.

Section 115.426 sets forth what parameters are to be monitored and what records are to be 

maintained by the owner or operator of each surface coating process. Among the monitored 

parameters are the material data sheets, and the quantity and type of each coating and solvent 

consumed during the specified averaging period. Records shall be maintained for at least two 

years and shall be made available upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or any local air pollution control agency establishes. Furthermore, compliance with the 

recordkeeping requirements of 40 CFR 63.752, (National Emission Standards for Aerospace 

Manufacturing and Rework Facilities), is considered to represent compliance with the 
7

requirements of this section (relating to Monitoring and Recordkeeping Requirements). This 

section will facilitate compliance determination. 

Section 115.427 states what surface coating processes are exempt for compliance with the 

emission specifications of pounds of VOC per gallon of coating. See §115.421(a)(9). This 

section will facilitate inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.429 sets forth the counties in which surface coating operations at the aerospace 

sources are subject to these control requirements. For compliance dates see §115.930.

Sections 115.420-429 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector. 

We have previously stated that the VOC requirements under the Act are in place for the HGB 

area for the 1-Hour ozone NAAQS (70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005; and 71 FR 52676, 

September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures meet those described in EPA’s 

Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Coating Operations at Aerospace 

Manufacturing and Rework Operations, EPA-453/R-97. Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q 

and A document, the framework described above, and TCEQ’s certification, a permissible 

approach per 70 FR 71612, November 29, 2008, that its level of control meets RACT (Appendix 

D of the April 6, 2010 SIP submittal), and our review we are proposing that the requirements 

established in sections 115.420-429 represent RACT for aerospace operations under the 8-Hour 

ozone NAAQS.

2 Surface coating for 

insulation of magnets 

Control of Volatile Organic Emissions 

from Existing Stationary Sources –

Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation 

of Magnet Wire, EPA-450/2-77-033-

1977/12

§115.420 – 429

Section 115.420 defines terms used in surface coating operations. Such definitions provide for 

consistency in application and enforcement of the rules. 

Section 115.421 states that VOC emissions from the surface coating processes cannot exceed the 

specified emission limits of paragraphs (1) - (15) of this subsection.

Section 115.422 establishes control requirements that surface coating operation will need to 

comply with. Establishing control requirements will provide for lowering VOC emissions. 
8

Section 115.423 provides for an alternative means control for surface coating operations. 

Emissions calculations shall be based on the pounds of VOC per gallon of solids for all affected 

coatings. This section provides for operational flexibility for operations.

Section 115.424 establishes that the owner or operator of each surface coating process must 

provide samples, without charge, upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or local air pollution control agency. In addition, the representative or inspector requesting the 

sample will determine the amount of coating needed to test the sample to determine compliance. 

This section promotes a source compliant operation.

Section 115.425 Section 115.425 establishes what test methods are to be used for testing 

requirements of the surface coating operations. Among these methods include: Test Method 24 

(40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 60, Appendix A) with a one-hour bake; ASTM Test 

Methods D 1186-06.01, D 1200-06.01, D 3794-06.01, D 2832-69, D 1644-75, and D 3960-81; 

EPA guidelines series document “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic 

Compounds (VOC) Emitted by Paint, Ink, and Other Coatings,” EPA-450/3-84-019, as in effect 

December, 1984; and additional test procedures described in 40 Code of Federal Regulations 

(CFR) 60.446. Adoption of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally enforceable 

mechanism for Chapter 115.

Section 115.426 sets forth what parameters are to be monitored and what records are to be 

maintained by the owner or operator of each surface coating process. Among the monitored 

parameters are the material data sheets, and the quantity and type of each coating and solvent 

consumed during the specified averaging period. Records shall be maintained for at least two 

years and shall be made available upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or any local air pollution control agency establishes. 

Section 115.427 states what type surface coating processes are exempt for compliance with the 

emission specifications of pounds of VOC per gallon of coating. See §115.421(a)(9). This 

section will facilitate inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.429 sets forth the counties in which surface coating operations at the aerospace 

sources are subject to these control requirements. For compliance dates see §115.930.

Sections 115.420-429 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector. 

We have previously found that the VOC requirements in place for the HGB area for the 1-Hour 

ozone NAAQS represent RACT for surface coating for insulation of magnets (70 FR 58136, 
9

October 5, 2005; and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures 

meet those described in EPA’s Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Existing Stationary 

Sources – Volume IV: Surface Coating of Insulation of Magnet Wire, EPA-450/2-77-033. 

Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document, the framework described above, and 

TCEQ’s certification, a permissible approach per 70 FR 71612, November 29, 2008, that its level 

of control meets RACT (Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 SIP submittal), and our review we are 

proposing that the requirements established in sections 115.420-429 represent RACT for this 

sector under the 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

3 Surface coating of coils Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, 

Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty 

Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008-1977/05

§115.420 - 429

Section 115.420 defines terms used in surface coating operations. Such definitions provide for 

consistency in application and enforcement of the rules. 

Section 115.421 sets specifies that VOC emissions from the coating (prime and topcoat, or single 

coat) of metal coils shall not exceed 2.6 pounds per gallon of coating (minus water and exempt 

solvent) delivered to the application system (0.31 kg/liter). 

Section 115.422 establishes control requirements that surface coating operation will need to 

comply with. Establishing control requirements will provide for lowering VOC emissions. 

Section 115.423 provides for an alternative means control for surface coating operations. 

Emissions calculations shall be based on the pounds of VOC per gallon of solids for all affected 

coatings. This section provides for operational flexibility for operations.

Section 115.424 establishes that the owner or operator of each surface coating process must 

provide samples, without charge, upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or local air pollution control agency. In addition, the representative or inspector requesting the 

sample will determine the amount of coating needed to test the sample to determine compliance. 

This section promotes a source compliant operation.

Section 115.425 establishes what test methods are to be used for testing requirements of the 

surface coating operations. Among these methods include: Test Method 24 (40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) 60, Appendix A) with a one-hour bake; ASTM Test Methods D 1186-06.01, 

D 1200-06.01, D 3794-06.01, D 2832-69, D 1644-75, and D 3960-81; EPA guidelines series 
10

document “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emitted 

by Paint, Ink, and Other Coatings,” EPA-450/3-84-019, as in effect December, 1984; and 

additional test procedures described in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 60.446. Adoption 

of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally enforceable mechanism for Chapter 

115.

Section 115.426 sets forth what parameters are to be monitored and what records are to be 

maintained by the owner or operator of each surface coating process. Among the monitored 

parameters are the material data sheets, and the quantity and type of each coating and solvent 

consumed during the specified averaging period. Records shall be maintained for at least two 

years and shall be made available upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or any local air pollution control agency establishes. 

Section 115.427 states what type surface coating processes are exempt for compliance with the 

emission specifications of pounds of VOC per gallon of coating. See §115.421(a)(9). This 

section will facilitate inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.429 sets forth the counties in which surface coating operations at the aerospace 

sources are subject to these control requirements. For compliance dates see §115.930.

Sections 115.420-429 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector. 

We have previously stated that the VOC requirements in place for the HGB area for the 1-Hour 

ozone NAAQS represent RACT for surface coating of coils (70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005; and 

71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures meet those described 

in EPA’s Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks, 

EPA-450/2-77-008. Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document, the framework 

described above, and TCEQ’s certification, a permissible approach per 70 FR 71612, November 

29, 2008, that its level of control meets RACT (Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 SIP submittal), 

and our review we are proposing that the requirements established in sections 115.420-429

represent RACT for this sector under the 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

4 Surface coating of 

fabrics

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, 

Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty 

Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008-1977/05

§115.420 - 429
11

Section 115.420 defines terms used in surface coating operations. Such definitions provide for 

consistency in application and enforcement of the rules. 

Section 115.421 sets specifies that VOC emissions from the coating of paper (or specified tapes or 

films) shall not exceed 2.9 pounds per gallon of coating (minus water and exempt solvent) 

delivered to the application system (0.35 kg/liter). 

Section 115.422 establishes control requirements that surface coating operation will need to 

comply with. Establishing control requirements will provide for lowering VOC emissions. In 

addition, beginning March 1, 2013 the owner or operator of a paper surface coating line subject to 

this division shall implement the following work practices to limit VOC emissions from storage, 

mixing, and handling of cleaning and cleaning-related waste materials. These work practices 

include: storing all VOC-containing cleaning materials must be stored in closed containers, keeping 

all mixing and storage containers must be kept closed at all times except when depositing or 

removing these materials, minimizing spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials, conveying 

VOC-containing cleaning materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes, 

minimizing VOC emissions from the cleaning of storage, mixing, and conveying equipment. 

Section 115.423 provides for an alternative means control for surface coating operations. 

Emissions calculations shall be based on the pounds of VOC per gallon of solids for all affected 

coatings. This section provides for operational flexibility for operations.

Section 115.424 establishes that the owner or operator of each surface coating process must 

provide samples, without charge, upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or local air pollution control agency. In addition, the representative or inspector requesting the 

sample will determine the amount of coating needed to test the sample to determine compliance. 

This section promotes a source compliant operation.

Section 115.425 establishes what test methods are to be used for testing requirements of the 

surface coating operations. Among these methods include: Test Method 24 (40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) 60, Appendix A) with a one-hour bake; ASTM Test Methods D 1186-06.01, 

D 1200-06.01, D 3794-06.01, D 2832-69, D 1644-75, and D 3960-81; EPA guidelines series 

document “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emitted 

by Paint, Ink, and Other Coatings,” EPA-450/3-84-019, as in effect December, 1984; and 

additional test procedures described in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 60.446. Adoption 
12

of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally enforceable mechanism for Chapter 

115.

Section 115.426 sets forth what parameters are to be monitored and what records are to be 

maintained by the owner or operator of each surface coating process. Among the monitored 

parameters are the material data sheets, and the quantity and type of each coating and solvent 

consumed during the specified averaging period. Records shall be maintained for at least two 

years and shall be made available upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or any local air pollution control agency establishes. 

Section 115.427 states what type surface coating processes are exempt for compliance with the 

emission specifications of pounds of VOC per gallon of coating. See §115.421(a)(9). This 

section will facilitate inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.429 sets forth the counties in which surface coating operations at the aerospace 

sources are subject to these control requirements. For compliance dates see §115.930.

Sections 115.420-429 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector. 

We have previously stated that VOC requirements in place for the HGB area for the 1-Hour 

ozone NAAQS represent RACT for surface coating of fabrics (70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005; 

and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures meet those 

described in EPA’s Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty 

Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008. Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document, the 

framework described above, and TCEQ’s certification, a permissible approach per 70 FR 71612, 

November 29, 2008, that its level of control meets RACT (Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 SIP 

submittal), and our review we are proposing that the requirements established in sections 

115.420-429 represent RACT for this sector under the 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

5 Surface 

coating 

of cans

Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, 

Automobiles, and Light-Duty Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-

008-1977/05

§115.420 - 429

Section 115.420 defines terms used in surface coating operations. Such definitions provide for 

consistency in application and enforcement of the rules. 

Section 115.421 states that VOC emissions from the coating of cans, on the basis of solvent 

content per gallon of coating (minus water and exempt solvent) delivered to the application system 

shall achieve the following limits established in 115.412(a)(7) ranging from 2.8 to 5.5 pounds per 
13

gallon of coating (0.34 to 0.66 Kg per liter of coating). The affected operation applies to a range 

of activities from “base coat” to “end sealing” and is most inclusive. 

Section 115.422 establishes control requirements that surface coating operation will need to 

comply with. Establishing control requirements will provide for lowering VOC emissions. 

Section 115.423 provides for an alternative means control for surface coating operations. 

Emissions calculations shall be based on the pounds of VOC per gallon of solids for all affected 

coatings. This section provides for operational flexibility for operations.

Section 115.424 establishes that the owner or operator of each surface coating process must 

provide samples, without charge, upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or local air pollution control agency. In addition, the representative or inspector requesting the 

sample will determine the amount of coating needed to test the sample to determine compliance. 

This section promotes a source compliant operation.

Section 115.425 establishes what test methods are to be used for testing requirements of the 

surface coating operations. Among these methods include: Test Method 24 (40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) 60, Appendix A) with a one-hour bake; ASTM Test Methods D 1186-06.01, 

D 1200-06.01, D 3794-06.01, D 2832-69, D 1644-75, and D 3960-81; EPA guidelines series 

document “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emitted 

by Paint, Ink, and Other Coatings,” EPA-450/3-84-019, as in effect December, 1984; and 

additional test procedures described in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 60.446. Adoption 

of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally enforceable mechanism for Chapter 

115.

Section 115.425 establishes what test methods are to be used for testing requirements of the 

surface coating operations. Among these methods include: Test Method 24 (40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) 60, Appendix A) with a one-hour bake; ASTM Test Methods D 1186-06.01, 

D 1200-06.01, D 3794-06.01, D 2832-69, D 1644-75, and D 3960-81; EPA guidelines series 

document “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emitted 

by Paint, Ink, and Other Coatings,” EPA-450/3-84-019, as in effect December, 1984; and 

additional test procedures described in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 60.446. Adoption 

of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally enforceable mechanism for Chapter 

115.
14

Section 115.426 sets forth what parameters are to be monitored and what records are to be 

maintained by the owner or operator of each surface coating process. Among the monitored 

parameters are the material data sheets, and the quantity and type of each coating and solvent 

consumed during the specified averaging period. Records shall be maintained for at least two 

years and shall be made available upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or any local air pollution control agency establishes. 

Section 115.427 states what type surface coating processes are exempt for compliance with the 

emission specifications of pounds of VOC per gallon of coating. This section will facilitate 

inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.429 sets forth the counties in which surface coating of cans are subject to these 

control requirements. For compliance dates see §115.930.

Sections 115.420-429 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector. 

We have previously stated that VOC requirements in place for the HGB area for the 1-Hour 

ozone NAAQS represent RACT for the surface coating of cans (70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005; 

and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures meet those 

described in EPA’s Surface Coating of Cans, Coils, Paper, Fabrics, Automobiles, and Light-Duty 

Trucks, EPA-450/2-77-008. Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document; the 

framework described above; and TCEQ’s certification (a permissible approach per 70 FR 71612, 

November 29, 2008) that its level of control meets RACT (Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 SIP 

submittal), and our review we are proposing that the requirements established in sections 

115.420-429 represent RACT for this sector under the 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

6 Use of cutback asphalt Control of Volatile Organic Emissions 

from Use of Cutback Asphalt, EPA450/2-77-037-1977/12

§115.510 – 519

Section 115.510 defines cutback asphalt as any asphaltic cement which has been liquefied by 

blending with petroleum solvents (diluents). Establishing such definitions provide for consistency 

in application and enforcement of the rules. 
15

Section 115.512 restricts the use, application, sale, or offering for sale of conventional cutback 

asphalt containing VOC solvents for paving roadways, driveways, or parking lots during the period 

from April 16 to September 15 of any year as a means of VOC control. 

Section 115.513 provides for alternate means of control if emission reductions are 

demonstrated to be substantially equivalent. This section provides for operational flexibility 

for operations.

Section 115.515 establishes test methods are to be used for testing requirements of the surface 

coating operations. These methods include American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) 

Test Method D 244, Standard Test Methods for Emulsified Asphalts, Sections 11 to 15, Residue 

and Oil Distillate by Distillation, as published in the 1997 edition of the Annual Book of ASTM 

Standards, for determining volatile organic compound (VOC) content of asphalt emulsions; (2) 

ASTM Test Method D 402, Standard Test Method for Distillation of Cut-Back Asphaltic Products, 

as published in the 1997 edition of the Annual Book of ASTM Standards, for determining the VOC 

content of cutback asphalt. Adoption of these Test Methods will provide for consistency and 

enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.516 states that any state, municipal, or county agency who uses or specifies the use of 

cutback asphalt or asphalt emulsion shall maintain records sufficient to document compliance with 

applicable restrictions and shall make such records available upon request to representatives of the 

executive director, EPA, or the local air pollution control agency having jurisdiction in the area. 

This requirement will facilitate inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.517 states that asphalt concrete made with cutback asphalt, used for patching, which 

is stored in a long-life stockpile (longer than one-month storage); and cutback asphalt used solely 

as a penetrating prime coat are exempt from control requirements. This section will facilitate 

inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.519 sets forth the counties in which use of cutback asphalt is subject to these control 

requirements. For compliance dates see §115.930.

Sections 115.510 – 519 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector.

We have previously stated that VOC requirements in place for the HGB area for the 1-Hour 

ozone NAAQS represent RACT for the use of cutback asphalt (70 FR 58136, October 5, 2005; 

and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures meet those 

described in EPA’s Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Use of Cutback Asphalt, EPA-
16

450/2-77-037. Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document, the framework 

described above, and TCEQ’s certification, a permissible approach per 70 FR 71612, November 

29, 2008, that its level of control meets RACT (Appendix D of the April 6, 2010 SIP submittal), 

and our review we are proposing that the requirements established in sections 115.510-519

represent RACT for this sector under the 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

7 Wood furniture

manufacturing

Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Wood Furniture 

Manufacturing Operations, EPA-453/R-96-

007-1996/04

§115.420 - 429

Section 115.420 defines terms used in surface coating operations. Such definitions provide for 

consistency in application and enforcement of the rules. 

Section 115.421 limits VOC emissions from the coating at wood manufacturing operations (i) 

using topcoats with a VOC content to no greater than 0.8 kilograms of VOC per kilogram of solids 

(0.8 pounds of VOC per pound of solids), as delivered to the application system; or (ii) if using a 

finishing system of sealers with a VOC content to no greater than 1.9 kilograms of VOC per 

kilogram of solids (1.9 pounds of VOC per pound of solids), as applied, and topcoats with a VOC 

content to no greater than 1.8 kilograms of VOC per kilogram of solids (1.8 pounds of VOC per 

pound of solids), as delivered to the application system. 

Section 115.422 provides for control requirements such that no compounds containing more than 

8.0% by weight of VOC may be used for cleaning spray booth components other than conveyors, 

continuous coaters and their enclosures, and/or metal filters. And if the spray booth is being 

refurbished, then the spray booth coating or other material used to cover the booth is being 

replaced is limited to no more than 1.0 gallon of organic solvent. For control purposes closed 

containers must be used for storage of finishing, cleaning, and wash off materials. See section 

115.422(3)(B). 

Section 115.423 provides for an alternative means of control for surface coating operations. 

Emissions calculations shall be based on the pounds of VOC per gallon of solids for all affected 

coatings. This section provides for operational flexibility for operations.

Section 115.424 establishes that the owner or operator of each surface coating process must 

provide samples, without charge, upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or local air pollution control agency. In addition, the representative or inspector requesting the 
17

sample will determine the amount of coating needed to test the sample to determine compliance. 

This section promotes a source compliant operation.

Section 115.425 establishes what test methods are to be used for testing requirements of the 

surface coating operations. Among these methods include: Test Method 24 (40 Code of Federal 

Regulations (CFR) 60, Appendix A) with a one-hour bake; ASTM Test Methods D 1186-06.01, 

D 1200-06.01, D 3794-06.01, D 2832-69, D 1644-75, and D 3960-81; EPA guidelines series 

document “Procedures for Certifying Quantity of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Emitted 

by Paint, Ink, and Other Coatings,” EPA-450/3-84-019, as in effect December, 1984; and 

additional test procedures described in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 60.446. Adoption 

of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally enforceable mechanism for Chapter 

115.

Section 115.426 sets forth what parameters are to be monitored and what records are to be 

maintained by the owner or operator of each surface coating process. Among the monitored 

parameters are the material data sheets, and the quantity and type of each coating and solvent 

consumed during the specified averaging period. Records shall be maintained for at least two 

years and shall be made available upon request by representatives of the executive director, EPA, 

or any local air pollution control agency establishes. 

Section 115.427 states what type surface coating processes are exempt for compliance with the 

emission specifications of pounds of VOC per gallon of coating. This section will facilitate 

inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.429 sets forth the counties in which surface coating operations at the aerospace 

sources are subject to these control requirements. For compliance dates see §115.930.

Sections 115.420-429 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector. 

We have previously stated that VOC requirements in place for the HGB area for the 1-Hour 

ozone NAAQS represent RACT for the wood furniture manufacturing (70 FR 58136, October 5, 

2005; and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures meet those 

described in EPA’s Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture 

Manufacturing Operations, EPA-453/R-96-007. Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A 

document; the framework described above; and TCEQ’s certification (a permissible approach 

per 70 FR 71612, November 29, 2008) that its level of control meets RACT (Appendix D of the 
18

April 6, 2010 SIP submittal), and our review we are proposing that the requirements established 

in sections 115.420-429 represent RACT for this sector under the 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

8 Large 

petroleum 

dry cleaners 

Control of Volatile Organic Compound 

Emissions from Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners, 

EPA-450/3-82-009-1982/09

§115.552 – 559 

Section 115.552 provides for control requirements for this sector by requiring owner or operator 

of a dry cleaning facility to install, maintain, and operate a solvent-recovery dryer that recovers at 

least 85% by weight of the used petroleum solvent; install, maintain, and operate a petroleum dryto-dry dryer that recovers at least 85% by weight of the used petroleum solvent; or route the 

exhaust air stream from the standard dryer to any other properly functioning control device which 

reduces the total emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) to the atmosphere by at least 85% 

by weight. 

Section 115.553 allows for alternate means of control by demonstrating and documenting 

continuous compliance. This section provides for operational flexibility of the facility.

Section 115.555 requires the owner or operator of an affected facility shall perform an initial test 

to verify that the flow rate of recovered solvent from the recovery dryer is no greater than 1.7 fluid 

ounces per minute (50 milliliters per minute) at the termination of the recovery cycle. The test 

must be conducted for the duration of one week during which no less than 50% of the dryer loads 

shall be monitored for their final recovered solvent flow rate. The methods used for testing include 

EPA Test Methods 1-4 (40 CFR 60, Appendix A) for determining flow rate, as necessary; Test 

Method 18 for determining gaseous organic compound emissions by gas chromatography; Test 

Method 25 for determining total gaseous non-methane organic emissions as carbon; and Test 

Methods 25A for determining total gaseous organic concentrations using flame ionization or nondispersive infrared analysis. Adoption of these approved Test Methods will provide for federally 

enforceable mechanism for Chapter 115.

Section 115.556 requires records of the performance test be maintained to demonstrate compliance 

with control requirements. This section will facilitate inspection and enforcement of the rule.

Section 115.557 states that any petroleum solvent dry cleaning facility that consumes less than 

2,000 gallons of petroleum solvent per year is exempted from the control requirements provisions 

of this sector. This section will facilitate inspection and enforcement of the rule.
19

Section 115.559 sets forth the counties in which large petroleum dry cleaning facilities are 

subject to these control requirements. This section has been in effect since May 27, 1994.

Sections 115.552 – 559 will provide for controlling VOC emissions from this sector. 

We have previously stated that VOC requirements in place for the HGB area for the 1-Hour 

ozone NAAQS represent RACT for the large petroleum dry cleaners (70 FR 58136, October 5, 

2005; and 71 FR 52676, September 6, 2006), thus finding that these control measures meet those 

described in EPA’s Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Large Petroleum 

Dry Cleaners, EPA-450/3-82-009. Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document, 

the framework described above, and TCEQ’s certification, a permissible approach per 70 FR 

71612, November 29, 2008, that its level of control meets RACT (Appendix D of the April 6, 

2010 SIP submittal), and our review we are proposing that the requirements established in 

sections 115.552-559 represent RACT for this sector under the 8-Hour ozone NAAQS.

The intended effect of this proposed action, combined with the April 2, 2013 (78 FR 19599) 

final action, is that Texas has VOC RACT in place for all sectors within the HGB area under the 

1997 8-Hour ozone NAAQS, with the exception of the 2006-2008 CTG series. As stated earlier, 

the RACT review of Texas rules for the 2006-2008 CTG series is not subject of this rulemaking 

action, and EPA will be acting on RACT for those sectors in a separate rulemaking action. The 

2006-2008 CTG series sectors (the eleven sectors) are:

The 2006-2008 CTG series sectors

Flat Wood Paneling Coatings; 

Flexible Packaging Printing Materials; 

Industrial Cleaning Solvents; 

Offset Lithographic and Letterpress Printing;

Large Appliance Coatings; 

Metal Furniture Coatings;

Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings; 

Auto and Light Duty Truck Assembly Coatings; 

Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials; 

Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives; and 

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings.

Conclusion: The EPA had previously approved RACT for VOC and NOx into Texas’ SIP under 

the 1-Hour ozone standard, thus finding that these control measures result in the lowest 
20

emissions limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting through application of control 

technology that is reasonably available, considering technological and economic feasibility. On 

April 2, 2013 (78 FR 19599) we finalized approval of RACT for several VOC emitting sectors in 

the HGB Area under the 1997 8-Hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 

Based on EPA’s May 18, 2006 RACT Q and A document; the framework identified above; 

TCEQ’s certification (a permissible approach per 70 FR 71612, November 29, 2008 - Final Rule 

to Implement the 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS) of its RACT; and our review we are proposing to 

approve the 30 TAC Chapter 115 control requirements as meeting RACT for VOC sources

identified in Table A in the HGB 1997 8-Hour ozone nonattainment area. Therefore, by 

implementing the 30 TAC Chapter 115 control requirements Texas has the 8-Hour RACT in 

place for VOC sources identified in Table A in the HGB area. We recommend proposing their 

approval into Texas SIP. We also recommend approval of negative declarations into Texas SIP.