alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit1026_2012LTIPAmendmentNo1


Exhibit 10.26




NEWPAGE HOLDINGS INC.
2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 1




This amendment (“Amendment”) to the 2012 Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) of NewPage Holdings Inc. (“NewPage”) is made as of November 11, 2013 as follows:
		
	(1)
	Section 15.4 (Tax Withholding) of the LTIP is amended by adding the following sentence at the end:  “The Company may pay cash to a director Participant from Common Stock withheld on vesting and/or exercise in an amount equal to the taxes due on vesting and/or exercise (whether required or not) for remittance by the director Participant to the proper taxing authorities.”




	
					
	Date:  February 7,  2014
	 
	 
	 
	NEWPAGE HOLDINGS INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	By:  /s/ George F. Martin                            

	 
	 
	 
	 
	George F. Martin

	 
	 
	 
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
SECOND AMENDMENT

                                 to
     
                  ASSUMPTION REINSURANCE AGREEMENT

                               Between
     
              UNIVERSAL GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
               hereinafter referred to as "the Company"

                                and
     
             FIRST INTERNATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
             hereinafter referred to as "the Reinsurer"
     

       WHEREAS, the Company and the Reinsurer have made and
     entered into an Assumption Reinsurance Agreement dated as of
     September 30, 1996 (the "Assumption Agreement"); and

       WHEREAS, the Company and the Reinsurer have made and
     entered into an Amendment to the Assumption Agreement dated
     as of September 30, 1996; and

       WHEREAS, the Company and the Reinsurer wish hereby to
     further amend the Assumption Agreement;

       NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
     agreements, promises and covenants provided herein, the
     Company and the Reinsurer hereby agree to amend the
     Assumption Agreement as follows:


     SECTION 1.-REGULATORY CONSENTS AND APPROVALS

            Section 2.1 of the Assumption Agreement is to be
     replaced with the following:

            "Section 2.1.  COVERAGE.  After the Effective Date
     and upon the terms and conditions, including Article
     XVI of the Coinsurance Agreement, and other provisions
     of this Assumption Agreement and any required
     governmental and regulatory consents and approvals,
     including consent and approval by the State of Ohio,
     the Company, if requested to do so by the Reinsurer,
     hereby agrees to cede to the Reinsurer and the
     Reinsurer hereby agrees to accept and reinsure, on an
     assumption basis, any Reinsured Policy.  Reinsurance
     pursuant to this Section 2.1 shall occur no less
     frequently than on a monthly basis until all Reinsured
     Policies have been assumed pursuant to the provisions
     of Article III hereunder; provided, however, that

<PAGE>

     reinsurance may occur more frequently if the parties
     hereto agree."  


     SECTION 2.-COUNTERPARTS

            This Second Amendment to the Assumption Agreement
     may be executed in several counterparts and each shall have
     the same force and effect as an original. 


     SECTION 3.-EFFECT

            Except as amended herein, the Assumption
     Agreement, together with all Exhibits, remains in full force
     and effect.
     
            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, UNIVERSAL GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE
     COMPANY and FIRST INTERNATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY have
     by their respective officers made and entered into this
     Second Amendment as of the 5th day of December, 1996.
     
     UNIVERSAL GUARANTY LIFE             FIRST INTERNATIONAL LIFE
     INSURANCE COMPANY                   INSURANCE COMPANY
     
     
     James E. Melville                   Jeremy Starr     
     By                                  By
      

     President                           Vice President, Reinsurance     
     Title                               Title
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34238]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Meeting

    The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) of the Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the following 
workshop.
    Name: Workshop on Public and Occupational Health Concerns at Rocky 
Flats, Colorado.
    Time and Date: 3 p.m.-9 p.m., January 7, 1998.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, 8773 Yates Drive, Westminster, Colorado 
80030-3678, telephone 303/427-4000.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 100 people.
    Purpose: The purpose of this workshop is to provide guidance to 
public health researchers on the inclusion of communities in the 
planning, conduct, and application of research.
    History has demonstrated, when medical and public health science is 
planned and conducted in the absence of considering the social context 
of its work, people have been harmed. As a result, society has 
responded with laws and regulations to protect human subjects who 
participate in research. Lacking in this discussion has been the issue 
of planning and conducting research that involves and impacts 
communities. This workshop will provide a unique opportunity to open 
dialogue between government, communities, and researchers. This 
dialogue should result in a proposed framework through which CDC 
promotes public health, advances democratic principles, establishes an 
ethical basis for community-based research, enhances scientific 
credibility, and provides mechanisms for building public trust while 
advancing the science of public health.
    Matters to be Discussed: Agenda items will include presentations on 
the Dose Reconstruction Project, the National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health studies, and the Workers Medical 
Surveillance project. Time will be set aside for public comments and 
discussions, with Agency staff, followed by the workshop being divided 
into breakout sessions: (1) Environmental Health Issues and (2) 
Occupational Health Issues.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Persons for More Information: Michael J. Sage, Deputy 
Chief, Radiation Studies Branch (RSB), or Carolyn M. Hart, RSB, 
Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, NCEH, CDC, 4770 
Buford Highway, NE, (F-35), Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 770/
488-7040, FAX 770/488-7044.

    Dated: December 30, 1997.
Julia M. Fuller,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 97-34238 Filed 12-31-97; 12:53 pm]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-M
254 La. 844

#### SISTERS OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD v. QUINN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.

No. 50102.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Sisters of the Good Shepherd applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 225 So.2d 225.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### Lee Roy COOPER, Jr. v. Wanda Louise COOPER.

No. 50346.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 20, 1978.

Joe Ray Langston, Thomas H. Comer, Jr., Duncan L. Lott, Booneville, for appellant.

Wanda Louise Cooper, pro se.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Alcorn County; James E. Bost and Fred P. Wright, Chancellors.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and rendered.

PATTERSON, C. J., SMITH, P. J., and WALKER, BROOM, LEE and BOWLING, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7190

DAVID E. DIXON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HORRY COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA; JOHN T. HENRY,

Horry County Sheriff; RALPH VAUGHT, Administrator, J. Reuben Long Detention Center; LIEUTENANT BOYD, J. Reuben Long Supervisory Officer; KENNETH I. GRATE, Lieutenant, J. Reuben

Long Detention Center Supervisory Officer;

RANDY GERALD, Sergeant, J. Reuben Long Detention Officer; CORPORAL MOSES, J. Reuben Long

Detention Center Officer; NURSE STACKHOUSE,

J. Reuben Long Detention Center; VICKIE LEWIS,

Nurse, J. Reuben Long Detention Center; MRS.

GRISSETT, Nurse, J. Reuben Long Detention

Center; ANN ANDERSON, J. Reuben Long Detention

Center; DOUGLAS FREEMAN, Horry County

Administrator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-1463-3BD)

Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: January 6, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit

Judge.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Dixon, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY & SENN,

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the

magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Appellant's motion for

summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 
 First Amendment to the 
 FOSTER WHEELER ANNUAL EXECUTIVE SHORT-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective February 28, 2013) 

The Foster Wheeler Annual Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, pursuant to a resolution adopted by
the Committee at its meeting held on February 26, 2014. 
 Capitalized terms used but not specifically defined herein shall have the
definition provided in the Plan. 
 1. The last sentence of Section 4.02 is hereby revised to read in its entirety as
follows: 
 “To the extent that an award is not paid within the Applicable Period but is paid by December 31 of the
calendar year which includes the last day of the Applicable Period, then it is intended that such payment shall be treated as made at a “specified time” for purposes of complying with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the “Code”).” 
 2. The following shall be inserted as a new Section 4.03: 

“4.03 Payment Following a Change in Control. 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the Foster Wheeler AG Omnibus Incentive Plan (as such
may be amended or restated from time to time)), the Committee may provide for the payment of short-term incentive awards to any or all Participants whose employment is terminated in connection with or following such Change in Control, which
short-term incentive awards may be based on performance through the date of the Change in Control or such other criteria as the Committee may approve, and in such event the “Applicable Period” shall begin on the date of the
Participant’s termination of employment and end on March 15 of the year following the year in which the Change in Control occurs.”
 3. This First Amendment shall be effective as of the date it is approved by the Committee. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to the Plan to be executed. 
  

			
	FOSTER WHEELER AG
		
	By:	 	_/s/ J. Kent Masters
	Name:	 	J. Kent Masters
	Title:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Cases Tagged with Funerals No results found for this tag.
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
#### W. C. ROURK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John B. LEVY et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 3507.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 22, 1971.

John B. Levy, Lafayette, for defendants-appellants.

Welton P. Mouton, Jr., Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.

Domengeaux, Wright & Bienvenu by D. Mark Bienvenu, Lafayette, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before FRUGÉ, SAVOY, and HOOD, JJ-

MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

This motion is before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal.

The record of the trial court not having been transmitted to this court, we do not have sufficient information upon which to consider the motion to dismiss.

For these reasons, the motion to dismiss the appeal is denied, reserving to any party the right to seek the same relief after the record is lodged in this court.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Corporation (the “Corporation”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, WalterJ. Zable, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

 
| /s/ W. J. Zable                                  |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| W. J. Zable                                      |   |
| Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                             |   |
| Date: February 5,  2008                     |   |

 

----
#### Robert Lee COLEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-967.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 17, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Submission to OMB for Review; Comment Request

December 22, 1997.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
2110, 1425 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1537.
    Regulation Project Number: REG-253578-96 NPRM.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Health Insurance Portability for Group Health Plans 
(Temporary) Interim Rules for Health Insurance Portability for Group 
Health Plans.
    Description: The regulations provide guidance for group health 
plans and the employers maintaining them regarding requirements imposed 
on plans relating to pre-existing condition exclusions, discrimination 
based on health status, and access to coverage.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit, Not-for-profit 
institutions, State, Local or Tribal Government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,300,000.
    Estimated Burden Hours Per Respondent: 27 minutes.
    Estimated Total Reporting Burden: 591,561 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Garrick Shear, (202) 622-3869, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 5571, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Alexander T. Hunt, (202) 395-7860, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10226, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.
Lois K. Holland,
Departmental Reports Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-34025 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          22,857
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       45
<OTHER-SE>                                     (22,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.0**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fox Chase Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Thomas M. Petro                                            |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Thomas M. Petro                                                |
|   |   | President and Chief   Executive Officer    March 28, 2016 |
|   |   |                                                           |
|   |   |                                                           |
|   | By:    | /s/ Roger S. Deacon                                            |
|   |   | Roger S. Deacon                                                |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer      March 28, 2016               |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6143
ANTHONY EUGENE BROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA; NEWPORT NEWS POLICE DEPARTMENT; KEVIN CHRISTOPHER HARTIAN, Agent/Policer; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY; SCOTT W. PUTNEY, Assistant U.S. Attorney; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-00574-HCM-JEB) Submitted: May 29, 2008 Decided: June 5, 2008 Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Eugene Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Anthony Eugene Brooks appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. City of Newport News , No. 2:07-cv-00574-HCM-JEB (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2007). We deny Brooks’ motions for appointment of counsel and to provide service. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED