alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
Swift Transportation Co., Inc.:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements  No.
33-66034  and  333-20651  on Form  S-3 and in the  Registration  Statements  No.
33-85940, 33-85942 and 33-85944 on Form S-8 of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. of
our report dated February 20, 1998, relating to the consolidated  balance sheets
of Swift  Transportation  Co., Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1996, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1997,  which report  appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K
of Swift Transportation Co., Inc.



                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP








Phoenix, Arizona
March 23, 1998
#### EASTERN AIR LINES, INC., Appellant, v. JACKSONVILLE PORT AUTHORITY, etc., Appellee.

No. FF-48.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 21, 1977.

Carmen L. Leon and William G. Bell, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Dawson A. McQuaig, Michael S. Nabi and William Lee Allen, Jacksonville, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

Eastern has filed its notice of appeal from a judgment awarding damages to Jacksonville Port Authority (JPA) resulting from Eastern’s default in complying with the terms of the lease with JPA. Having considered the record and briefs of the parties, we find no error.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 27 (Monday, February 10, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3201]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[IDI-29331]


Notice of Action; Amendment of the Little Lost-Birch Creek 
Management Framework Plan (MFP)/Notice of Realty Action (NORA), Direct 
Sale of Public Land in Butte County, ID

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

NOTICE: Notice is hereby given that the BLM has amended the Idaho Falls 
District's Little Lost-Birch Creek MFP to allow for direct sale of 60 
acres of public land to Butte County.

SUMMARY: The following described lands have been examined and through 
the public supported land use planning process have been determined to 
be suitable for direct sale to Butte County pursuant to Section 203 of 
the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) (43 U.S.C. 
1716).

T. 5 N., R. 29 E., BM

    Sec. 4, N\1/2\NW\1/4\SW\1/4\, N\1/2\S\1/2\NW\1/4\SW\1/4\;
    Sec. 5, N\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\, N\1/2\S\1/2\NE\1/4\SE\1/4\;

    The purpose of this land sale is to allow Butte County the 
opportunity to acquire public land in the vicinity of the county's Howe 
Landfill including Butte County's current landfill operation. Sale of 
the land would serve important public objectives for Butte County.
    The land patent, when issued, would contain a reservation to the 
United States for ditches and canals.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Detailed information concerning the 
conditions of the direct sale can be obtained by contacting Bruce Bash, 
Realty Specialist, at (208) 524-7521. Upon publication of this notice 
in the Federal Register, the land described above will be segregated 
from appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining 
laws, except for the sale provisions of FLPMA.

Planning Protest

    Any party who participated in the plan amendment and is adversely 
affected by the amendment may protest this action only as it affects 
issues submitted for the record during the planning process. The 
protest shall be in writing and filed with the Director (480), Bureau 
of Land Management, Resources Planning Team, 1849 ``C'' Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C., 20240, within 30 days of publication of this notice.

Land Sale Comments

    For a period of 45 days from the date of publication of this notice 
in the Federal Register, interested parties may submit comments 
regarding the land sale to Joe Kraayenbrink, Acting Area Manager, 
Bureau of Land Management, Big Butte Resource Area, 1405 Hollipark Dr., 
Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401. Objections will be reviewed by the BLM Idaho 
Falls District Manager who may sustain, vacate, or modify this realty 
action. In the absence of any planning protests or objections regarding 
the land sale, this realty action will become the final determination 
of the Department of the Interior and the planning amendment will be in 
effect.

    Dated: January 27, 1997.
Joe Kraayenbrink,
Acting Area Manager, Big Butte Resource Area.
[FR Doc. 97-3201 Filed 2-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

964 

CA 13-01921 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

SUSAN L. BOTTICELLI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

GARY A. BOTTICELLI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

 

LABIN & BUFFOMANTE, WILLIAMSVILLE (CLAYTON J. LENHARDT OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

ROBERT S. STEPHENSON, BUFFALO, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County

(Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered January 18, 2013 in a divorce

action. The judgment, inter alia, equitably distributed the assets of

the parties. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed on September 10,

2014,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### Edmond WYCHE and Inez Wyche a/k/a Inez Wood, Appellant, v. Betram SCHOENBLATT and Horace Mann Insurance Company, Appellee.

No. 74-189.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 28, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; Robert W. Tyson, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Document

Exhibit 10.1.2

SUPPLEMENT TO SUBSIDIARY GUARANTY
Reference is hereby made to the Amended and Restated Subsidiary Guaranty (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Guaranty”) made as of January 2, 2020, by each of the Material Domestic Subsidiaries of Arcosa, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”) listed on the signature pages thereto (each, an “Initial Guarantor” and together with any additional Subsidiaries of the Borrower, which become parties thereto and together with the undersigned, the “Guarantors”) in favor of the Administrative Agent, for the ratable benefit of the Holders of Guaranteed Obligations, under the Credit Agreement.  Capitalized terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Guaranty.  By its execution below, the undersigned StonePoint Holding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “New Guarantor”), agrees to become, and does hereby become, a Guarantor under the Guaranty and agrees to be bound by such Guaranty as if originally a party thereto.  By its execution below, the undersigned represents and warrants as to itself that all of the representations and warranties contained in Section 2 of the Guaranty are true and correct in all respects as of the date hereof.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, New Guarantor has executed and delivered this Annex I counterpart to the Guaranty as of this 31st day of August, 2021.
STONEPOINT HOLDING, LLC


By:      /s/ Gail M. Peck            
Gail M. Peck
Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 6997 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 6997

 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the supply of 
 prescription drugs for which the Secretary pays for veterans during a 
                        public health emergency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2020

Mr. Roy (for himself, Mr. Banks, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Steube, Mr. Norman, Mr. 
Budd, Mr. Harris, Mr. Green of Tennessee, and Mr. Perry) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the supply of 
 prescription drugs for which the Secretary pays for veterans during a 
                        public health emergency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Prescription Flexibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS 
              FOR VETERANS DURING PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY.

    (a) Increase of Supply of Prescriptions.--During a public health 
emergency, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall pay for 
prescriptions for up to a 90-day supply of drugs, including over-the-
counter drugs and medical and surgical supplies, written by an eligible 
health care provider, notwithstanding section 17.4025(b)(1) of title 
38, Code of Federal Regulations, or such successor regulation.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``eligible health care provider'' means a 
        health care provider under section 1703(c) of title 38, United 
        States Code, or an eligible entity or provider under section 
        1703A(b) of such title.
            (2) The term ``public health emergency'' means a public 
        health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
        U.S.C. 247d).
                                 <all>
```
#### Benjamin MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. O-361.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 17, 1971.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Robert P. Davidow, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Raymond L. Marky, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals judgments of conviction and sentences of the following crimes, viz.: Possession of heroin on May 13, 1970; Sale of heroin on May 13, 1970; Sale of cocaine on May 14, 1970; Possession of heroin on May 15, 1970; and Sale of heroin on May 15, 1970. Sentences of 5 years for each conviction were imposed by the trial judge to be served concurrently.

Two points are asserted by defendant on appeal. First, he contends that the court committed reversible error in allowing the jury, over his objection, to take the information into the jury room. Such contention is without merit. Roberts v. State, 188 So.2d 392 (Fla.App.3d, 1966).

Defendant’s second point pertains to the sentences upon each count of the information. The convictions of possession and sale of heroin on the 13th day of May, 1970, were upon a facet or phase of the same transaction. The same is true of the convictions of possession and sale of heroin on the 15th day of May, 1970. As stated in Wells v. State, 168 So.2d 787 (Fla.App.3d, 1964):

> “ * * * It is established law in Florida that where convictions are entered on two offenses, each of which constitutes a facet of a single transaction, it is improper to impose sentence on each. Williams v. State, Fla.1953, 69 So.2d 766; Tribue v. State, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 630; Sharon v. State, Fla.App., 156 So.2d 677, supra. In such a case, only one sentence should be imposed and that sentence should be on the highest offense charged. * * * ”

Also see Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.App.3d, 1971). We consider the sale of the contraband to be the more serious, or highest, offense, therefore, the sentences imposed for possession of heroin on the 13th day of May, 1970, and possession of heroin on the 15th day of May, 1970, *284are set aside. The sentences imposed for sale of heroin on the 13th day of May, 1970, the sale of cocaine on the 14th day of May, 1970, and the sale of heroin on the 15th day of May, 1970, are affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
No. D-2217.

#### In re Disbarment of Dryer.

Disbarment entered. [For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 1008.]
#### D.W.A., a juvenile, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. FF-334.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 21, 1977.

*844Alan B. Bookman of Holsberry, Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Patti Englander, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having examined the record and briefs of counsel, we find no error in the lower court’s order adjudicating appellant a delinquent child.

AFFIRMED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
The Effectiveness of 

Homeownership Counseling 

A Presentation by 

Dr. Marvin M. Smith

The views expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Reserve Bank 

of Philadelphia or the Federal Reserve System. 

The Effectiveness of 

Homeownership Counseling 
“Like many domains within financial literacy 

research, homeownership education and counseling 

have never been rigorously evaluated 

through a randomized field experiment.”

― J. Michael Collins and Collin O’Rourke

University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2011 

Research Need
 Study Objective

 Experimental Design

 Recruitment of 

Participants

 Eligibility

 Time Period

 Partnerships

 Clarifi

 Abt Associates

Study Background
Age 50% are under 35 years old

Gender 2/3 are women 

Race 78% are African American

Marital 

Status 75% are single

Education 2/3 have attended some college or more 

Earnings 52% earn between $12,000 and $35,988 annually

Our Participants
Banking Products

Our Participants: Banking Products

90% of participants

have checking 

accounts

90.0%

69.9%

14.1%

48.0%

10.5%

88.4%

72.2%

15.6%

49.3%

10.3%

Checking Savings Money

Market/CDs

401(k)/IRA Savings at

home

Control Treatment
Average Total Debt: $28,353

Our Participants: Total Debt
 Outcome of random assignment

 Tracking of participants 

 Credit scores

 Credit reports

 Annual follow-up surveys 

 Delivery of services

 All-day training workshop 

 Monitoring of counseling sessions

Study Structure
What They Learned

2-Hour Session 1-on-1 Counseling

Control • 2-Hour Session

Treatment

• 2-Hour Session

• 1-on-1 Counseling
 Financial behavioral outcomes

 Total debt

 Delinquencies in payments (including 

mortgage payments)

 Credit scores

 Homeownership rates

Focus of Analysis
Our Homeowners

61participants

in treatment 

group

52 participants

in control group

113 total homeowners
-4%

-8%

Control Treatment*

% Change in Total Debt

Treatment homeowners

Homeowners: Reduction in Total Debt

8%

witnessed an 

 reduction

 in total debt

* p < 0.10
Homeowners: 

Reduction in Delinquent Payments

Homeowners receiving 

one-on-one counseling saw a 

larger reduction

in late payments

-0.7

0

-0.2

-1.5

-0.6

-0.9

30 Days* 60 Days 90 Days 30 Days*** 60 Days 90 Days

Control Treatment

Change in Number of Payments

* p < 0.10, *** p<0.01
8.3

16.1

Control Treatment***

Change in Credit Scores

Credit scores increased by 

 Homeowners: Increase in Credit Scores

16.1points

for those receiving the 

treatment

*** p < 0.01
 Counseling matters even in challenging 

economic times

 A little counseling helps, but more counseling 

helps even more 

 Policy implication – added benefit/added cost

 Counseling benefits those who later become 

homeowners and those who do not

 May help some consumers realize they are not 

financially ready to purchase

 Homeowners pay mortgages on time

Key Findings
Thank you
DEBENTURE EXTENSION - Keevil

  
 iWallet Corporation | 7394 Trade Street | San Diego, CA 92196-3418 | (800) 508-5042
  
 July 13, 2021
  
 To: iWallet Debenture Holders
  
 Dear Sir/Madam:
  
 We refer to the secured convertible debentures issued by iWallet Corporation (the “Company”), dated April 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 (the “Debenture”) issued to the undersigned debentureholder (the “Debentureholder”). The Company is requesting permission to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) until April 30, 2022. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Debenture.
  
 The Company and the Debentureholder hereby amends the Debentures as follows:
  
 1. Each reference to the Maturity Date in the Debenture shall be amended to reflect “April 30, 2022”.
  
 All other terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect unamended and time shall continue to be of the essence.
  
 If you are in agreement with the terms and conditions of this letter, please sign and return to my attention.
  
 Yours truly,
  
 IWALLET CORPORATION
  
 By: /s/ Steve Cabouli
 “Authorized Signing Officer”
  
 The undersigned hereby acknowledges and consents to the above noted amendment, extending the Maturity Date until April 30, 2022.
  
 	 If Debentureholder is a corporation, trust, partnership or other entity:
	  
	 If Debentureholder is an individual:

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 /s/ Thomas Keevil

	 Name of Entity
	  
	 Signature

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	 Thomas Keevil

	 Signature of Person Signing
	  
	 Name of Individual

	  
	  
	  

	  
	  
	  

	 Title of Person Signing
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7126 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 

to direct the Secretary of Defense to include questions regarding racism, 

anti-Semitism, and supremacism in workplace surveys administered by 

the Secretary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2020 

Mr. BROWN of Maryland (for himself and Mr. TURNER) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2020 to direct the Secretary of Defense to include 

questions regarding racism, anti-Semitism, and supremacism in workplace surveys administered by the Secretary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Defense 

5 Anti-Semitism and Racism Awareness Act of 2020’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7126 IH

1 SEC. 2. QUESTIONS REGARDING RACISM, ANTI-SEMITISM, 

2 AND SUPREMACISM IN WORKPLACE SURVEYS 

3 ADMINISTERED BY THE SECRETARY OF DE4 FENSE. 

5 Section 593 of the National Defense Authorization 

6 Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116–92) is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a) QUESTIONS REQUIRED.— 

9 ’’ before ‘‘The Secretary’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘, racist, 

11 anti-Semitic, or supremacist’’ after ‘‘extremist’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub13 section: 

14 ‘‘(b) REPORT.—Not later than March 1, 2021, the 

15 Secretary shall submit to Congress a report including— 

16 ‘‘(1) the text of the questions included in sur17 veys under subsection (a); and 

18 ‘‘(2) which surveys include such questions.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00202

- CV

I N RE T REATMENT E QUIPMENT C OMPANY
, J ANICE V. S MITH
, AND B RUCE S. S MITH §

§

§

§

§ O riginal P rocee ding

F rom the Probate Court

of Denton County (PR

- 2014

- 00697

- 01)

July 23, 2 019

Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court conditionally grant s, in part, the relief requested in relators

Treatment Equipment Company, Janice V. Smith

, and Bruce S. Smith’s petition for

writ of mandamus. We order the trial court to vacate the parts of its Ju ne 3, 2019

order (1) ordering relators to respond to the improper requests for production listed

and referred to in the order and (2) overruling relators’ objections to request s for

production 18 through 22.We order real party in interest Phillip E. Rom ero, as Independent Executor of

the Estate of Michael Kilborn

, to pay the costs of this original proceeding

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By / s/ Dana Womack Justice Dana Womack
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6767-6768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP96-200-017]


NorAm Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in 
FERC Gas Tariff

February 7, 1997.
    Take notice that on February 3, 1997, NorAm Gas Transmission 
Company (NGT) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, 
Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, the following revised tariff sheets to be 
effective February 1, 1997:

Tenth Revised Sheet No. 7
Third Revised Sheet No. 7A
Third Revised Sheet No. 7B
Third Revised Sheet No. 7C
Third Revised Sheet No. 7D
Original Sheet No. 7E.01
Original Sheet No. 7E.02
Original Sheet No. 7E.03
First Revised Sheet No. 7F

    NGT states that these tariff sheets are filed herewith to reflect 
specific negotiated rate transactions for the month of February, 1997.
    Any person desiring to protest said filing should file protest with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, D.C. 20426, in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). All such protests 
must be filed as provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's 
Regulations. Protests will be considered by the Commission in 
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to 
make protestant parties to the proceeding. Copies of this filing are

[[Page 6768]]

on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3551 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
================================================================================

EXHIBIT  32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Cyberfund, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("Report"), I, Mark G. Hollo, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Mark G. Hollo
----------------------------------------
Mark G. Hollo
Chief Executive Officer










--------------------------------------------------------------------------------