alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                            Exhibit 3.1(b)

                                       CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                                  OF

                                     CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                               * * * * *


Continental Global Group, Inc., a corporation (the "Corporation"), organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware,

         DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation by the unanimous
written consent of its members, filed with the minutes of the Board, adopted a
resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation:

                  RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of Continental
         Global Group, Inc. be amended by changing the fourth article thereof so
         that, as amended, said article shall be and read as follows:

                           "4. The total number of shares which the Corporation
                           shall have authority to issue is Five Million
                           (5,000,000), common shares; each share being one
                           penny ($.01) par value stock."

         SECOND:           That in lieu of a meeting and vote of stockholders,
                           the stockholders have given unanimous written consent
                           to said amendment in accordance with the provisions
                           of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the
                           State of Delaware.

         THIRD:            That the  aforesaid  amendment  was duly adopted in
                           accordance with the applicable provisions of
                           Sections 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law
                           of the State of Delaware.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said CONTINENTAL GLOBAL GROUP, INC. has caused this
certificate to be signed by Joseph L. Mandia, its Vice Chairman, this 9th day of
Aug., 2000.


                                                  By:     Joseph L. Mandia
                                                          ----------------------

                                                  Title:  Vice Chairman
                                                          ----------------------
- - UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IV 

MEMORANDUM 

345 COURTLAND STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30365 

DATE: 

SUBJECT: Decision to Transfer Koppers NPL CERCLA Site, Florence, SC from Dual 

CERCLA/RCRA Coordination to Exclusive RCRA Lead and Responsibility 

FROM: 

THRU: 

TO: 

Richard 

Superfund 

D. 

Branch 

Stonebraker, Chief 

~~ 

~ 

/ ---...:;; 

Patrick M. Tobin, Director/' -y IOl7 vV 

Waste Management Division 

James Scarbrough, Chief 

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Branch 

As per our staff meeting at 11:00 a.m. on August 31, 1987 

regarding the Koppers NPL Site in Florence, South Carolina, the 

Superfund Branch is hereby relinquishing direct control of its 

oversight responsibilities directed towards implementing a Remedial 

Action/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) to the RCRA staff. 

Due to the Site's dual CERCLA/RCRA status and the anticipated filing 

of a Consent Order under 42 USC Section 3008(h) by RCRA, 

implementation and enforcement of the evaluation and remedy selection 

activities (normally covered during the RI/FS process under CERCLA) 

can be incorporated into the proposed 3008(h) RCRA Consent Order. 

Coordination and inclusion of pertinent verbage pursuant to the NCP 

and the SARA amendments ensures full compliance for both programs, 

but lessens the expense and burden of CERCLA/RCRA coordination by 

both the Agency and the company. 

Should you have any questions, feel free to call me at extension 

2234. 

uu.JvlJi 

~\f ' r. k F B ? 3;.. ·,;-'·U"'- R-") , "'.1 t .l' " .' \, It ."''''t. <_ • ....-.c..: :;;aG. '-J " 

, ~ SC 003 3 026
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: AUTOZONERS, LLC,

 

 Relator. 

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00065-CV

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Real Party in Interest motion for extension of time within which 

to file the response to Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus until September 14, 2021. NO 

FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REAL PARTY IN 

INTEREST’S RESPONSE TO RELATOR’S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WILL 

BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ordered that the Hon. John P. Mobbs, the Real Party in Interest’s attorney, 

prepare the Real Party in Interest response to Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and forward 

the same to this Court on or before September 14, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13th day of August, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
#### Lily PRINCE v. James Elgie KENNEMER.

Civ. 25.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

March 1, 1974.

Whereas, on February 7, 1974 the Supreme Court of Alabama, 292 Ala. 168, 291 So.2d 152, on writ of certiorari, reversed and annulled the judgment of this Court rendered in this cause *on*February 14, 1973, 52 Ala.App. 214, 291 So.2d 146 and remanded the cause to this Court for further proceedings.

Therefore, pursuant to the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court of Alabama in this cause, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the Circuit Court be and the same is hereby reversed and annulled; and the cause is remanded to the Circuit Court for proceedings in consonance with the opinion of the Supreme Court rendered in this cause.

It is further ordered that the appellee, James Elgie Kennemer, pay the costs accruing on said appeal in this Court and in the Court- below, for which costs let execution issue.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VENTURE HOLDINGS TRUST FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000864167
<NAME> VENTURE HOLDINGS TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,477
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,930)
<INVENTORY>                                     52,616
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,244
<PP&E>                                         319,275
<DEPRECIATION>                               (113,510)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 524,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,143
<BONDS>                                        333,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   524,122
<SALES>                                        624,113
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               624,113
<CGS>                                          521,361
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,358
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,523
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

<FN>
INCLUDES THE BALANCE OF THE "AMORTIZATION OF DEBT EXPENSE
AND DEBT DISCOUNT"
</FN>






</TABLE>
FU 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
 

OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUGES
 

In the Matter of 

) 

) 

) 

POL YPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

) 

) 

Docket No. 9327 

) 

ORDER DENYING RESPONDENT'S MOTION 

TO CHANGE HEARING LOCATION 

On March 13,2009, Respondent submitted a Motion to Set Hearng Location. 

Respondent seeks to set the location of 
 the hearng in Charlotte, North Carolina. 

On March 20,2009, Complaint Counsel submitted its Response to Respondent's Motion 

to Set Hearing Location. Complaint Counsel opposesRespondent's request to move the hearing 

from the Federal Trade Commission in Washington, D.C. 

The parties were informed, at the October 22, 2008, prehearing scheduling conference, 

that holding the administrative hearing in North Carolina would be considered, if everyone were 

to agree. Complaint Counsel does not agree to move the trial to North Carolina. 

Upon consideration of the points raised in the motion and the opposition thereto, 

Respondent's motion is DENIED. The hearing in this matter wil commence on May 12,2009, 

in room 532, Federal Trade Commission Building, 600 Pennsylvania, Ave., N.W., Washington, 

DC 20580. 

ORDERED: J)~ ~. ~
 - D. Michael Chappell 

Administrative Law Judge 

Date: March 24, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1105-1106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-338]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. CP97-161-000]


Williams Natural Gas Company; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

January 2, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 19, 1996, Williams Natural Gas Company 
(WNG), P.O. Box 3288, Tulsa Oklahoma 74101, filed in the above docket, 
a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 157.212(a) and 157.216(b) of the 
Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act for authorization to 
relocate and replace the Kansas Gas & Electric Burden town border meter 
setting and appurtenant facilities,

[[Page 1106]]

located in Cowley County, Kansas, under the authorization issued in 
Docket No. CP82-479-000 pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, 
all as more fully set forth in the request which is on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection.
    WNG states that the projected volume of delivery through the 
relocated facilities will remain unchanged. The total project cost is 
estimated to be $23,780.
    WNG states that this change is not prohibited by an existing tariff 
and that it has sufficient capacity to accomplish the deliveries 
specified without detriment or disadvantage to its other customers.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 
385.214) a motion to intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant 
to Section 157.205 of the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 
157.205) a protest to the request. If no protest is filed within the 
time allowed therefor, the proposed activity is deemed to be authorized 
effective on the day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a 
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time 
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request shall be treated as 
an application for authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural 
Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-338 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### In re ESTATE of Alfredo VICENTE, Deceased.

No. 73-606.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT
23








Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








The Board
of Directors


Benchmark
Electronics, Inc.:





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-28997, 333-54186, 333-66889, 333-103183, 333-101744, 333-136798
and 333-156202) on Form S-8 of Benchmark Electronics, Inc. of our reports
dated March 1, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Benchmark Electronics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive
income (loss), shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial
statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31,
2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Benchmark Electronics, Inc.











(signed)
KPMG LLP


Houston,
Texas


March 1,
2010
GREGORY JUNKIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3846

Opinion filed February 19, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Gregory Junkin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. Petitioner shall be allowed a belated 

appeal from the December 20, 2014, Order Denying Post-Conviction Relief in Leon 

County Circuit Court case number 2009CF2174. Upon issuance of mandate in this 
2

cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit court for 

treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). If petitioner qualifies 

for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent petitioner on 

appeal.

WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>
 
                                                            Exhibit 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Robert S. Hillas and Mark J. Maten, or either of
them, as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, to do any and all acts, including the
execution of documents, which said attorneys, or either of them, may deem
necessary or advisable to enable Envirogen, Inc. (the "Company") to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations
and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in connection with
the filing under such Act of an annual report of the Company on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998, including the power and authority to sign in
the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities in which
the signature of the undersigned would be appropriate, such annual report and
any and all amendments thereto and generally to do and perform all things
necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as
the undersigned could do if personally present.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereto set his or her hand this
26th day of March, 1999.



 

 
                                    /s/ Nicholas J. Lowcock
                                    -----------------------                    
                                      Nicholas J. Lowcock

                                      61
EXHIBIT 21.1

TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

|                                                          |  |                              |  |                                                 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|Name of Corporation                                       |  | Jurisdiction ofIncorporation |  | % of VotingSecuritiesOwned by itsImmediateParent
|Transatlantic Reinsurance Company                         |  | New York, U.S.A.             |  |                                                 
|Putnam Reinsurance Company                                |  | New York, U.S.A.             |  |                                                 
|Trans Re Zurich                                           |  | Zurich, Switzerland          |  |                                                 
|Transatlantic Re (Argentina) S.A.                         |  | Argentina                    |  |                                                 
|Transatlantic Re (Brasil) Ltda                            |  | Brazil                       |  |                                                 
|Transatlantic Polska Sp. z o.o                            |  | Warsaw, Poland               |  |                                                 
|TRC (PANAMÁ) S.A.                                         |  | Panama                       |  |                                                 
|Transatlantic Professional Risk Management Services, Inc. |  | Delaware, U.S.A.             |  |                                                 





| 
|-
|*



---
**EXHIBIT 15**

** **

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Cubic Corporation

 

We have reviewed the condensed consolidatedbalance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of December 31, 2007, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cashflows for the three month period ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.  These financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance withstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates).  A review of interim financialinformation consists principally of applying analytical procedures, and makinginquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than anaudit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is theexpression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such anopinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of anymaterial modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S.generally accepted accounting principles.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance withthe standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),the consolidated balance sheet of Cubic Corporation as of September 30,2007 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’equity and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in ourreport dated November 30, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion onthose consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information setforth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30,2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to theconsolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

 

 

San Diego, California

January 31, 2008

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3359]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

University of Wyoming; Notice of Decision on Application for 
Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instrument

    This decision is made pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Related records can be viewed 
between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 4211, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    Docket Number: 96-117. Applicant: University of Wyoming, Laramie, 
WY 82071-3006. Instrument: Electron Microprobe, Model JXA-8900/5CH. 
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 61 FR 
66017, December 16, 1996.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as it is intended to be used, is being manufactured in the 
United States. Reasons: The foreign instrument provides high accuracy 
elemental analysis of surface microareas with a scanning image 
magnification of  x  40 to 300 000 (WD: 11 mm) and a secondary electron 
image resolution to 6 nm. The National Institute of Standards and 
Technology advises that (1) these capabilities are pertinent to the 
applicant's intended purpose and (2) it knows of no domestic instrument 
or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument 
for the applicant's intended use.
    We know of no other instrument or apparatus of equivalent 
scientific value to the foreign instrument which is being manufactured 
in the United States.
Frank W. Creel,
Director, Statutory Import Programs Staff.
[FR Doc. 97-3359 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Bernie LUDWIG v. STATE.

No. 38178.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 215 So.2d 898.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

p0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

147069

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147069

COA: 311678

Wayne CC: 11-005439-FC

ELMOE DOZIER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7026
KEVIN SMITH, a/k/a Bar-None-Royal Blackness, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusLAURIE F. BESSINGER; JOYCE BROWN; VAUGHN JACKSON; MARCELLA MCCOY; JUDY C. ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-97-51-O-23BD) Submitted: January 27, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Bessinger , No. CA-97-51-O-23BD (D.S.C. June 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED