alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1804 

To amend the public participation requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2021 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself and Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the public participation requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

Liability Act of 1980, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Cleanup 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1804 IH

1 SEC. 2. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. 

2 (a) PROPOSED PLAN.—Section 117(a) of the Com3 prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

4 Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9617(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘.’’ at the end 

6 and inserting ‘‘, including the highest ranking offi7 cial of the local government with jurisdiction over 

8 the facility subject to the plan.’’; and 

9 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘(including 

10 comments regarding use of the facility at issue after 

11 remedial action is taken)’’ after ‘‘written and oral 

12 comments’’. 

13 (b) FINAL PLAN.—Section 117(b) of the Comprehen14 sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil15 ity Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9617(b)) is amended by insert16 ing ‘‘, and transmitted to all local, elected officials with 

17 jurisdiction over the facility subject to the plan,’’ after 

18 ‘‘available to the public’’. 

19 (c) PUBLICATION.—Section 117(d) of the Com20 prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

21 Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9617(d)) is amended— 

22 (1) by inserting ‘‘and require’’ after ‘‘publica23 tion shall include’’; and 

24 (2) by striking ‘‘general circulation.’’ and in25 serting ‘‘general circulation (if available), announce26 ment sent to a radio station, or television station, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1804 IH

1 the broadcast area of which includes the community 

2 surrounding the facility at issue, relevant and appro3 priate digital or social media publications, and post4 ing to the website of the President, State, or other 

5 person who, as appropriate, is proposing to adopt a 

6 plan for remediation under section 104, 106, 120, or 

7 122.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2005 of CrownCrafts, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 16, 2005     /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson     Amy Vidrine Samson
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MUNEEFA ABDULLAH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55888 

D.C. No. 

2:15-cv-09581-SVW-JPR 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 8, 2018**

Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and BATAILLON,

***

District Judge.

Muneefa Abdullah appeals from the district court’s judgment in favor of The 

Walt Disney Company in this copyright action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for 

the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAR 8 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

28 U.S.C. § 1291. After a careful examination of each alleged similarity between 

The Snow Princess and Frozen, the district court concluded that the two works are 

not substantially similar under the extrinsic test as a matter of law. We agree and 

therefore affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its well-reasoned 

decision granting The Walt Disney Company’s motion to dismiss.

1

AFFIRMED.

 

1 For the first time on appeal, Abdullah contends that the witch is the princess’s 

subconscious. Even if that were apparent from the text of The Snow Princess, 

which it is not, the outcome is the same because it is an entirely different 

expression of the idea of a princess with ice powers than presented in Frozen. See

Funky Films, Inc. v. Time Warner Entm’t Co., 462 F.3d 1072, 1078–79 (9th Cir. 

2006) (rejecting appellants’ “attempt to link up” the main characters in the works 

because the expression of the generic traits of those characters was different).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000025657
<NAME>                        CRESTED CORP.


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-2001
<CASH>                          5,900
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,900
<PP&E>                          1,354,400
<DEPRECIATION>                  1,205,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,903,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           8,477,100
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10,500
<OTHER-SE>                      (2,592,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    6,903,500
<SALES>                         48,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,614,700
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   175,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,287,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,151,100
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,151,100
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    2,151,100
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.21



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32(d)**

 

**The Dayton Powerand Light Company**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Theundersigned officer of The Dayton Power and Light Company (the “Issuer”) herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009, which this certificate accompanies,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained thereinfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Issuers as of the dates and for the periods expressedtherein.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, orotherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within theelectronic version of this statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Issuer and will beretained by the Issuers and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

Signed:

 

 
| /s/  Frederick J. Boyle                          |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Frederick  J. Boyle                              |   |
| Senior  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |   |
| Treasurer  and Controller                        |   |

 

Date:April 29, 2009

 

The foregoing certificate is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theIssuer’s Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7968

JAMES B. WEERSING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. CAPTAIN, SHIFT SUPERVISOR; C. MITCHELL,

Grievance Officer; CALVIN ANTHONY, Warden;

GARY MAYNARD, Director, South Carolina

Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-01-308-8-24BI)

Submitted: June 30, 2004 Decided: July 19, 2004

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Weersing, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Foster McLeod, HARRIS

& MCLEOD, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James B. Weersing appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Weersing v. Sanyo, No.

CA-01-308-8-24BI (D.S.C. Nov. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Joe YOUNG, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-614.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 18, 1974.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Bruce J. Daniels, Asst. Public Defender, and Thomas J. Woolley, Jr., Legal Intern, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Thomas M. Carney and Stephen R. Koons, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged with breaking and entering with intent to commit a *felony*and plead guilty to the lesser included offense of breaking and entering with intent to commit a *misdemeanor,*which latter plea the record clearly reflects was accepted by the court. However, the record further reflects that the defendant was inadvertently adjudicated guilty of breaking and entering with intent to commit a *felony.*The State’s brief concedes this inadvertence. We have considered the other • points raised by the defendant and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence for breaking and entering with intent to commit a *felony*is vacated and set aside and the cause remanded to the trial court for the re-imposition of the appropriate judgment and sentence consistent with the record herein.

WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.
#### Christina ANDERSON, n/k/a Christina Carpenter, Appellant, v. Ralph L. ANDERSON, Appellee.

No. 69-941.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 12, 1970.

Rehearing Denied June 2, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### REX SELL REALTY CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

No. 2617.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 21, 1969.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
----

**Exhibit        32.2**

| (1)    | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |

|   | /s/                  Robert Scott Lorimer |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | ROBERT                  SCOTT LORIMER     |   |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer  |   |
|   | August                  12, 2005          |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                       506
<INVENTORY>                                     39,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,142
<PP&E>                                          92,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 146,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,955
<BONDS>                                         65,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   146,652
<SALES>                                        192,081
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,081
<CGS>                                          142,015
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,015
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,197
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,447
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                   Exhibit 32.1


                  Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
                           Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Datascope Corp.
(the "Company") for the Quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


May 17, 2004



                            /s/ Lawrence Saper
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                            Lawrence Saper
                            Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer




                            /s/ Murray Pitkowsky
                            ---------------------------------------------------
                            Murray Pitkowsky
                            Senior V.P., Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Trunkbow International Holdings Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Li Qiang, the ChiefExecutive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

July 3, 2012
#### John G. BAND, Deceased, Doris L. Band, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL SUPPLY, LUMBERMEN’S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY and the Department of Commerce, Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.

No. 42865.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 12, 1972.

Certiorari denied.

ROBERTS, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32(a)


            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                         (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation, a New
Jersey corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), John H. Freeman, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



September 10, 2008                      /s/ John H. Freeman
                                   ____________________________________
                                   John H. Freeman
                                   President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained by
Dataram Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor
Corporation.

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.          
| |                                     
| |                                     
| | Joseph Feldshcuh                    
| | President                           
| | Chief Executive Officer             
| | Chairman of the Board of
  Directors
| | Principal Executive
  Officer       
| | August 11, 2009                     

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Daxor Corporation and will be retained by Daxor Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Warren Elwood MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-487.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Thomas J. CARLISLE, Appellant, v. JAPAN AIR LINES COMPANY, Ltd., a foreign corporation doing business in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 70-142.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 7, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2023

- 2635

_____________________________ S HAWN M ARTIN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

R ICKY D. D IXON , Secretary, Florida Department o f Corrections
, Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

June 21, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits.

L EWIS , R OBERTS , and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Shawn Martin, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.