T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T R IS T A N C A R L P A B L O -R IV E R A , a. k. a. T r i s t a n C . P abl o, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71880 A ge nc yN o. A 040- 497- 052 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an dG O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T r i s t a n C a r l P abl o- R i ve r a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f

r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) r e m ova l or de r . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JU L 05 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71880 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f la w , N ga eth v. Mukasey , 5 4 5 F . 3 d7 9 6 , 8 0 0 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 8 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA corr ec t l y det erm i ned thatP abl o-R i vera ’ s c on vi ct i on s und er C al i forni a P enal C od e § 45 9 are aggravat ed fe l on y a tt em pt ed theftoffe nses w here the r e c or d of

c onvi c t i on e s t abl i s he s tha tP abl o- R i ve r apl e d gui l tyon both oc c a s i ons to e n te r in g alo c k e dv e h ic le w ith th e in te n t to c o m m it th e f t. Se e i d. a t8 0 2 ( “ [ A] conv i ct i on for e nt er i ng a l ocked v ehi cl e w i th the i nt entt o com m i ttheftconst i tut es a n a tte m p te dth e f

t o f f e n s e f o rp u rp o s e s o f

th e a g g r a v a te df

e lo n yd e f

in itio n .” ) ; se e al so R am i rez- V

i l lal pa ndo v. H

older , 645 F . 3d 1035, 1040- 41 ( 9th C i r . 2011) ( u s in g a n ab s tr a c t o f

ju d g m e n t in c o m b in a tio n w ith ac h a r g in g d o c u m e n t to es t abl i sh re m ov abi l i ty) . In l i gh tof thi s det erm i nat i on , the B IA corr ec t l y c on cl ud ed th a t P ab lo - R iv e r ais r e m o v ab le u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( iii) , a n dis st atut ori l y i nel i gi bl e f

or cancel l at i on of re m ov al un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 22 9b (a )( 3). C ontr a ryt o P abl o- R i ve r a ’ s c ont e nt i ons , the I Jdi d nots hi f tthe bur de n of pr oof t o hi m , a nd the a ge nc ydi d notr e l yon hi s he a r i ng t e s t i m onyi n c onc l udi ng th ath i s co n v i ct i o n s co n st i tu t e rem o v ab l e o ffen ses. W e d o n o t e n te rta in P ab lo - R iv e r a ’s M o tio n to R e o p e n a n dV a c a te R e m o v a l, f i l e do n Ju n e 2 9 , 2 0 1 2 . An yr e q u e s tf o rr e o p e n i n g s h o u l db e f i l e dwi th th e B I A. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.