alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67723-67724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33886]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

15 CFR Part 922

[Docket No. 970103001-7001-01]
RIN 0648-XX79


Point Reyes/Farallon Islands National Marine Sanctuary

AGENCY: Sanctuaries and Reserves Division (SRD), Office of Ocean and 
Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), National Ocean Service (NOS), 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of 
Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Correction to final regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to the final regulation 
which was published on January 27, 1997 (62 FR 3788). That regulation 
changed the name of the Point Reyes/Farallon Islands National Marine 
Sanctuary to the Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary. This 
document corrects the January 27, 1997 final regulation by instructing 
that all uses of the acronym ``PRNMS'' are changed to ``GFNMS'' within 
part 922 of title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 30, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Moore at (301) 713-3141.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The name of the Point Reyes/Farallon Islands 
National Marine Sanctuary (PRNMS) was changed to the Gulf of the 
Farallones National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS) on January 27, 1997 (62 FR 
3788). Regulations for the GFNMS are found in part 922 of title 15 of 
the Code of Federal Regulations. In the January 27, 1997 final 
regulations, NOAA overlooked the need to also replace the acronym 
``PRNMS'' with ``GFNMS'' throughout Part 922. This document corrects 
the January 27, 1997 final regulation by officially replacing

[[Page 67724]]

``PRNMS'' with ``GFNMS'' throughout part 922.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the Federal Register document published on January 27, 
1997 (62 FR 3788) is corrected by adding amendatory instruction 3 to 
read as follows:
    ``3. Part 922 is amended by deleting ``PRNMS'' wherever it appears 
and replacing it with ``GFNMS''.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. Sec. 1431 et seq.

(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary 
Program)

    Dated: December 18, 1997.
Nancy Foster,
Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone Management.
[FR Doc. 97-33886 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-08-M
edbl_ex108.htm

EXHIBIT  10.8
  
 Edible Garden AG Incorporated
  
 Form of Demand Note
  
 	 Face Amount: $[__] 
	  
	 [DATE]


  
 For value received, the undersigned Edible Garden AG Incorporated, (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of [__], its successors or assigns (the “Lender”), [__] ($[__]) (the “Face Amount”). 
  
 There will not be any interest charged for the time that it is outstanding.
  
 ________________________________________ 
 Michael C. James 
 Chief Financial Officer 
 Edible Garden AG Incorporated 
  
 Date:
#### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Antonio PIZANO-CORNEGO, also known as Javier Vega, also known as Diablo, Appellant.

No. 01-3798.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 7, 2002.

Decided Aug. 16, 2002.

*48Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, MCMILLIAN, and RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Pizano-Cornego appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Northern District of Iowa after he pleaded guilty to two counts of distributing methamphetamine within 1000 feet of a school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), (b)(1)(C) and 860(a), and one count of brandishing a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii). The district court sentenced appellant to concurrent 108-month prison terms on the distribution counts and a consecutive 84-month term on the firearm count, followed by 8 years supervised release. Counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing for reversal that the district court erred in sentencing appellant for brandishing — rather than merely possessing — the firearm.

We conclude that, based on the testimony of an undercover agent at sentencing, the district court correctly sentenced Piza-no-Cornego for brandishing a firearm. *See United States v. Carlson,*217 F.3d 986, 987-89 (8th Cir.2000), *cert, denied,*531 U.S. 1095, 121 S.Ct. 822, 148 L.Ed.2d 706 (2001). We have also reviewed the record independently under *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Donald E. O'Brien, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.
258 La. 575

#### Louise Hano BORER v. SECURITY INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 51339.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1971.

In re: Louise H. Borer applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 245 So.2d 5.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6792

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID WAYNE DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Vi rginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-00-359; CA-05-273-1) Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 23, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Wayne Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Gordon Dean Kromberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: David Wayne Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.02

                          Section 1350 Certification

In connection with this annual report of Futures Portfolio Fund Limited
Partnership (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (this "Report"), I, Barbara Rittenhouse, Comptroller of the General
Partner of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2005


/s/ Barbara Rittenhouse
-----------------------
By
Barbara Rittenhouse
Comptroller of the General Partner
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (commission file No. 33-51584), on Form S-8 (commission
file No. 33-68890), and on Form S-8 (commission file No. 333-28571) of our
report dated February 19, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Appliance Recycling Centers of America, Inc., and subsidiaries
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 1999.




                                                       McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 1999
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 6997 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the supply of prescription drugs for which the Secretary pays for veterans during a public 

health emergency. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2020 

Mr. ROY (for himself, Mr. BANKS, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. STEUBE, Mr. NORMAN, 

Mr. BUDD, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. GREEN of Tennessee, and Mr. PERRY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the 

supply of prescription drugs for which the Secretary pays 

for veterans during a public health emergency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Prescription 

5 Flexibility Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 6997 IH

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENT BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR VETERANS 

3 DURING PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY. 

4 (a) INCREASE OF SUPPLY OF PRESCRIPTIONS.—Dur5 ing a public health emergency, the Secretary of Veterans 

6 Affairs shall pay for prescriptions for up to a 90-day sup7 ply of drugs, including over-the-counter drugs and medical 

8 and surgical supplies, written by an eligible health care 

9 provider, notwithstanding section 17.4025(b)(1) of title 

10 38, Code of Federal Regulations, or such successor regula11 tion. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

13 (1) The term ‘‘eligible health care provider’’ 

14 means a health care provider under section 1703(c) 

15 of title 38, United States Code, or an eligible entity 

16 or provider under section 1703A(b) of such title. 

17 (2) The term ‘‘public health emergency’’ means 

18 a public health emergency declared by the Secretary 

19 of Health and Human Services under section 319 of 

20 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2622 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2622

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 16, 2021

   Mr. Gonzalez of Ohio (for himself, Mr. Joyce of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
   Balderson, Mr. Reschenthaler, and Mr. Diaz-Balart) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                                 Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Concerns Over Nations Funding 
University Campus Institutes in the United States Act'' or the 
``CONFUCIUS Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Confucius Institute'' 
means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the 
Government of the People's Republic of China.
    (b) Restrictions on Confucius Institutes.--An institution of higher 
education or other postsecondary educational institution (referred to 
in this section as an ``institution'') shall not be eligible to receive 
Federal funds from the Department of Education (except funds under 
title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) 
or other Department of Education funds that are provided directly to 
students) unless the institution ensures that any contract or agreement 
between the institution and a Confucius Institute includes clear 
provisions that--
            (1) protect academic freedom at the institution;
            (2) prohibit the application of any foreign law on any 
        campus of the institution; and
            (3) grant full managerial authority of the Confucius 
        Institute to the institution, including full control over what 
        is being taught, the activities carried out, the research 
        grants that are made, and who is employed at the Confucius 
        Institute.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Greg Allen JOHNSON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-1356.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2002.

Decided Aug. 16, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Greg Allen Johnson appeals his conviction for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. We affirm.

The superseding indictment charged Johnson with participating in a conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine from July *491997 to September 2000. At trial, the government presented testimony by numerous witnesses that Johnson was engaged in distributing methamphetamine during this entire period, though his suppliers and customers varied over time. Focusing on the change of suppliers that occurred when Johnson’s initial supplier was arrested in August 1998, Johnson argues that the evidence at trial established the existence of multiple conspiracies, a fatal variance in the government’s proof. We disagree. “[T]he fact that there may have been multiple sources of [methamphetamine] does not create multiple conspiracies, and the evidence here supports the view that those charged in this case were members of a single conspiracy, even though there may have been other drug conspiracies in the community.” *United States v. Cabbell,*35 F.3d 1255, 1262 (8th Cir.1994). In addition, a claim of fatal variance requires *proof of*prejudice, and “it is difficult to see how the defendant was prejudiced given that he was the sole defendant on trial and was ... implicated in any other conspiracy the evidence could prove.” *United States v. Lopez-Arce,*267 F.3d 775, 781 (8th Cir.2001).

Johnson further argues that the district court1 erred in giving the multiple conspiracy instruction approved by this court in *United States v. Adipietro,*983 F.2d 1468, 1475 (8th Cir.1993), rather than a longer instruction requested by the defense. This contention is without merit. “If the evidence supports a single conspiracy, the failure to give a multiple conspiracy instruction is not reversible error.” *United States v. Roach,*164 F.3d 403, 412 (8th Cir.), *cert, denied,*528 U.S. 845 (1999).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

1

. The HONORABLE HAROLD D. VIETOR, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 235 (Monday, December 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 64598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-31904]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Title II Fiscal Year 1998 Development Program Proposal Final 
Draft Guidelines and FY 1997 Annual Results Report

    Pursuant to Section 207(b) of the Agricultural Trade Development 
and Assistance Act of 1954 (P.L. 480), as amended, notice is hereby 
given that the final draft P.L. 480 Title II guidelines for fiscal year 
1999 Program Proposals and Fiscal Year 1997 Annual Results Reports is 
being made available to interested parties for the required thirty-day 
comment period.
    Individuals who wish to receive a copy of the draft guidelines 
should contact: Office of Food for Peace, Agency for International 
Development, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue (RRB 7.06-153), Washington, DC 
20523-0809. Contact person: Gwen Johnson, (202) 712-0664. Individuals 
who have questions or comments on the draft guidelines, should contact 
David Nelson at (202) 712-1828.
    The thirty-day comment period will begin on the date that this 
announcement is published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 20, 1997.
William T. Oliver,
Director, Office of Food for Peace, Bureau for Humanitarian Response.
[FR Doc. 97-31904 Filed 12-5-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE WET
SEAL, INC. BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      31,590,000
<SECURITIES>                                59,916,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,665,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 28,002,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            86,991,000
<PP&E>                                     117,483,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              57,110,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             197,490,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       65,135,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,362,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 118,916,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               197,490,000
<SALES>                                    485,389,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           485,389,000
<CGS>                                      336,527,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              110,554,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (3,894,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             42,202,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                16,248,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         25,954,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                25,954,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.91
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


All of the entities listed below are wholly owned subsidiaries of K-Swiss Inc.

1.    K-Swiss Pacific Inc., a Massachusetts corporation.

2.    K-Swiss International Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of
      Bermuda.

3.    K-Swiss (UK) Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation.

4.    K-Swiss Amsterdam B.V., a Dutch corporation.

5.    K-Swiss S.A. de C.V., a Mexico corporation.

6.    K-Swiss Australia Pty. Ltd., an Australia corporation.

7.    K-Swiss International Services (BAARN) B.V., a Dutch corporation.

8.    K-Swiss Direct Inc., a California corporation.

9.    K-Swiss Sales Corp., a Delaware corporation.

10.   K-Swiss NS Inc., a Delaware corporation.

11.   K-Swiss Canada Corp., a Nova Scotia company.

12.   1166789 Ontario Inc., an Ontario, Canada corporation.

13.   Royal Elastics, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 68283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. CP98-145-000]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Request Under Blanket 
Authorization

December 24, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 18, 1997, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest), 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, Utah 84158, 
filed in Docket No. CP98-145-000 a request pursuant to Sections 157.205 
and 157.216 of the Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act 
(18 CFR 157.205, 157.216) for authorization to abandon by removal its 
Dr. Gambile Farm Tap (Farm Tap) located on Northwest's Grants Pass 
Lateral in Douglas County, Oregon, under Northwest's blanket 
certificate issued in Docket No. CP82-433-000 pursuant to Section 7 of 
the Natural Gas Act, all as more fully set forth in the request that is 
on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    Northwest states that the Farm Tap was originally constructed to 
deliver natural gas to The Washington Water Power Company's (Water 
Power) predecessor for service to a single customer; however, there 
have been no deliveries to the Farm Tap since October 1995. Northwest 
states that by letter dated November 12, 1997, Water Power stated that 
the Farm Tap is no longer needed and can be abandoned. Northwest states 
that it currently has no firm contractual obligations to provide 
service to the delivery point.
    Northwest proposes to abandon the Farm Tap by removing the two one-
inch regulators and related piping and all the above ground 
appurtenances at the station site, including the fence. Northwest 
states that the cost of removing the facilities will be approximately 
$1,500.
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 45 days after 
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule 
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to 
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to Section 157.205 of 
the Regulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 CFR 157.205) a protest to 
the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefor, 
the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the 
day after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed 
and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time allowed for filing a 
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for 
authorization pursuant to Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34112 Filed 12-30-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M