alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Fredrick Burton ZONGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-5035.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 13, 2002.

Before KEITH, MOORE, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

*696
      *ORDER*

Fredrick Burton Zonge appeals a district court judgment dismissing his habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

In 1994, a jury sitting in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee found Zonge guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The district court sentenced Zonge to 120 months of imprisonment and 3 years of supervised release. Zonge did not appeal. In 1996, Zonge moved the district court to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court denied that motion, and this court dismissed the subsequent appeal for want of prosecution. In 1997, Zonge moved this court for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate sentence. This court denied that motion.

In his current § 2241 habeas corpus petition filed in August 2000, Zonge claimed that the district court lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate the criminal charge against him because 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) does not proscribe his possession of a firearm until he is forty-five years old. The district court dismissed the petition, concluding that Zonge could not challenge the imposition of his sentence under § 2241.

Zonge reasserts his claim in his timely appeal. He also moves the court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly dismissed Zonge’s § 2241 petition for the reasons stated in its October 31, 2000, memorandum opinion. *Charles v. Chandler,*180 F.3d 753, 755 (6th Cir.1999). Zonge may not challenge his conviction and imposition of sentence under § 2241, instead of § 2255, because he has not established that his remedy under § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. *Id.*at 755-56.

Accordingly, we grant the request for pauper status for purposes of this review and affirm the district court’s judgment. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,881
<INVENTORY>                                    122,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               200,023
<PP&E>                                          10,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 425,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,625
<BONDS>                                         48,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         38
<COMMON>                                        23,642
<OTHER-SE>                                     234,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   425,210
<SALES>                                        420,323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               420,323
<CGS>                                          305,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  305,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,960
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                137,723
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.10
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of The
Wet Seal, Inc. for the year ended January 30, 2010, I, Edmond S. Thomas, president and chief executive officer of The Wet Seal, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. This Form 10-K for the year ended January 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended
January 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Wet Seal, Inc.

Date: March 31, 2010



/s/    EDMOND S.
THOMASEdmond S. ThomasPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Donald Edmond WINES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-151.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 9, 1970.

Chester B. Chance, Gainesville, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and J. Christian Meffert, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court is affirmed. See Fields v. State, 160 Fla. 877, 36 So.2d 919 (1948).

JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
Companies Receiving Letters From Federal Trade Commission 

Concerning Labeling and Advertising of “Bamboo” Textiles

All About Bamboo, Inc., d/b/a

Bamboo EcoWear

FogDog, Inc. Panda Snack

Altrec.com, Inc. Footprint Bamboo Pumpkin Doodle

Amazon.com, Inc. Garnet Hill, Inc. Pure Fiber International, Inc.

Andra Group LP, d/b/a 

HisRoom.com and HerRoom.com

Gilligan & Ferneman LLC, d/b/a

Dri Bamboo

QVC, Inc.

Andrew Christian, Inc. Gold Toe Moretz LLC Recreational Equipment, Inc.

[REI]

Backcountry.com Corp. Green Earth Bamboo Saks Incorporated

Bamboo Originals GreenLoop Sears Holdings Corporation

Bambooya Hanesbrands, Inc. Shirts of Bamboo

Barney’s New York, Inc. JC Penney Company, Inc. Sierra Trading Post, Inc.

Bed Bath & Beyond Jockey International, Inc. Spiegel Brands, Inc.

BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. Kassatex, Inc. Target Corporation

Bloomingdale’s, Inc. Kayser-Roth Corporation 

[No Nonsense]

The Gap, Inc.

Boscov’s Department Store, LLC Kmart Corporation The Sports Authority, Inc.

Buchic, LLC Kohl’s Corporation The Great Indoors

C-IN2 Industries, LLC Komar Company [Cuddl Duds] Tommy Bahama Group, Inc.

Chico’s Brand Investments, Inc.,

d/b/a Soma Intimates

Land’s End, Inc. totes ISOTONER Corporation

Color Image Apparel, Inc. [ALO] Leon Max, Inc., d/b/a Max Studio Toys “R” Us, Inc.

Costco Wholesale Corporation Macy’s, Inc. TranquiliT

Doie Designs Maidenform Brands, Inc. Turning Life, LLC

Dream Soft Bedware, LLC Midori Linen Uncommon Scents, Inc.

Dreamsacks, Inc. Natural Clothing Company ValueVision Media, Inc., d/b/a

Shop NBC

Earth Sake NH All Natural Vortex Organics, d/b/a Organic

Bamboo Clothing

Eco-Fabrik NIMLI, Inc. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

EcoDesignz LLC Nordstrom, Inc. Wayi, LLC

EcoSkin, Inc. Nuare Living Wear the Earth

Faerie’s Dance Overstock.com, Inc. Zappos.com, Inc.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132176 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132176 COA: 260594 Allegan CC: 04-013795-FH XAVIER ZACHARIAH BENDER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 17, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2005 ofCrown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 15, 2005         /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson         Amy Vidrine Samson    Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
10-30 Exhibit AYE Deferral Comp of Directors  - 12.31.13


Exhibit 10-30


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
REVISED PLAN FOR DEFERRAL OF COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS


WHEREAS, Allegheny Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Amended and Restated Revised Plan for Deferral of Compensation of Directors (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, the Company became a wholly owned subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp. (“FirstEnergy”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 10, 2010, as amended as of June 4, 2010, by and among FirstEnergy, Element Merger Sub, Inc. and the Company (the “Merger Agreement”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, FirstEnergy authorized certain officers of FirstEnergy to amend or modify plans maintained by the Company with regard to administrative or governance matters;
WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended at any time with certain limitations that are not applicable for this Amendment No. 1.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of  December 1, 2011, in order to apply to amounts applied on or after that date, as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 4.5 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




“4.5    Definition of Market Value Per Share.  ” Market Value Per Share” means an amount based on a reasonable method including a price based on the opening, closing, actual, high, low, average selling prices, or on the average of the high and low sales prices of the Common Stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the date in which the determination of the Market Value Per Share is made or, if there are no sales of Common Stock on that date, then on the next preceding date on which there were sales of Common Stock.  If the Common Stock is no longer publicly traded, Market Value Per Share shall be determined by the Board in such manner as it deems appropriate.”


		
	2.
	The last sentence of Section 4.1 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




“In addition, the Stock Account shall be credited with Dividend Equivalents (as defined below) at the time dividends, if any, are paid to shareholders.” 


		
	3.
	The last sentence of Section 4.2(b) is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:





1


Exhibit 10-30


“In addition, the Stock Unit Account shall be credited with Dividend Equivalents (as defined below) at the time dividends, if any, are paid to shareholders.” 


		
	4.
	Except as otherwise amended by this Amendment No. 1, all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FirstEnergy has caused its duly authorized officer to executive this Amendment No. 1 of the Plan on behalf of the Company to evidence its adoption on  February 20, 2014.




EXECUTED ON BEHALF OF ALLEGHENY ENERGY, INC.                                  BY FIRSTENERGY, CORP.


	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Anthony J. Alexander,
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Anthony J. Alexander,
	 
	 

	 
	 
	President and Chief Executive
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Officer of FirstEnergy Corp.
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 









2
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |

|   | /s/                Harold F. Herron |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | HAROLD                F. HERRON,    |   |
|   | President                           |   |
|   | August                12, 2005      |   |
#### Dennis APPLE, Appellant, v. Bernard GARMIRE, individually and as Chief of Police of the City of Miami, and the City of Miami, a municipal corporation in the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-281.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 10, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7131 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7131

   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit deprivation of 
rights under color of law by law enforcement and correctional officers, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2020

  Mr. Espaillat (for himself and Ms. Norton) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit deprivation of 
rights under color of law by law enforcement and correctional officers, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Denial of Rights Prevention and 
Accountability Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS BY LAW ENFORCEMENT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 242 the following:
``Sec. 242A. Deprivation of rights by law enforcement
    ``Whoever, being a law enforcement officer or correctional officer, 
under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, 
recklessly subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, 
Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, 
or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the 
United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on 
account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or 
race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be 
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; 
and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of 
this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or 
threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be 
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; 
and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this 
section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, 
aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual 
abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or 
imprisoned for any term of years, or both.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 242 the following:

``242A. Deprivation of rights by law enforcement.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2478 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2478

 To increase the availability of menstrual products in certain public 
                   buildings, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2021

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To increase the availability of menstrual products in certain public 
                   buildings, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Menstrual Products in Federal 
Buildings Act''.

SEC. 2. MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS IN PUBLIC BUILDINGS.

    (a) Requirement.--Each appropriate authority shall ensure that 
menstrual products are stocked in, and available free of charge in, 
each covered restroom in each covered public building under the 
jurisdiction of such authority.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Appropriate authority.--The term ``appropriate 
        authority'' means the head of a Federal agency, the Architect 
        of the Capitol, or other official authority responsible for the 
        operation of a covered public building.
            (2) Covered public building.--The term ``covered public 
        building'' means a public building, as defined in section 3301 
        of title 40, United States Code, that is open to the public and 
        contains a public restroom, and includes a building listed in 
        section 6301 or 5101 of such title.
            (3) Covered restroom.--The term ``covered restroom'' means 
        a restroom in a covered public building, except for a restroom 
        designated solely for use by men.
            (4) Menstrual products.--The term ``menstrual products'' 
        means sanitary napkins and tampons that conform to applicable 
        industry standards.
                                 <all>
```
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2473 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 275 Penn Avenue in Salem, Ohio, as the 

‘‘Howard Arthur Tibbs Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2473 RFS

1 SECTION 1. HOWARD ARTHUR TIBBS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 275 Penn Avenue in Salem, 

4 Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Howard Ar5 thur Tibbs Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Howard Arthur Tibbs 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 14, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS