alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Richard Charles SWIGERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-551.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

Dec. 30, 1969.

Maurice Rosen, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Harold Mendelow, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

PEARSON, Chief Judge

(specially concurring).

I think it ■ should be pointed out for the guidance of the bar that the question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis. This court has recognized the existence of the writ in conjunction with the post-conviction relief supplied by Rule 1.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A. See McCormick v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 164 So.2d 557; Davis v. State, Fla. App.1966, 191 So.2d 440.

Historically the writ of error coram nobis was reserved for extreme cases in which great injustice would be done if the writ were not awarded and no other means for obtaining judicial relief was available. See 18 Am.Jur.2d, Coram Nobis, § 1, page 448. It is my view that the appellant’s petition did not present a basis for the relief sought because it showed that appellant had served his sentence under the judgment of conviction he had sought to have vacated, and it failed to show that he was in jeopardy of losing any legal right because of the judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-3O-1998
<CASH>                        112,628
<SECURITIES>                  41,034,130
<RECEIVABLES>                 160,483
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   25,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              41,647,963
<PP&E>                        1,115,096
<DEPRECIATION>                761,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                42,033,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         7,284,890
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      53,097
<OTHER-SE>                    34,748,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  42,033,372
<SALES>                       90,613
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              733,806
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 677,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            241,245
<INCOME-PRETAX>               55,844
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           55,844
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  55,844
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.01
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33799]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 96N-0048]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of OMB 
Approval

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled, ``Sterility Requirements for 
Inhalation Solution Products'' has been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(the PRA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen L. Nelson, Office of Information 
Resources Management (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1482.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of September 23, 
1997 (62 FR 49638), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 
section 3507 of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3507). An agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. 
OMB has approved the information collection and has assigned OMB 
control number 0910-0353. The approval expires on November 30, 2000.

    Dated: December 18, 1997.
William K. Hubbard,
Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
[FR Doc. 97-33799 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
EXHIBIT 21.1

TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.  SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Name of Corporation

Jurisdiction of Incorporation

% of Voting
Securities
Owned by its
Immediate ParentTransatlantic Reinsurance Company

New York, U.S.A.


100
%Putnam Reinsurance Company

New York, U.S.A.


100
%*Trans Re Zurich

Zurich, Switzerland


100
%*Transatlantic Re (Argentina) S.A.

Argentina


100
%*Transatlantic Re (Brasil) Ltda.

Brazil


100
%*Transatlantic Polska Sp. z o.o.

Warsaw, Poland


100
%*TransRe Germany GmbH

Munich, Germany


100
%*TRC (PANAMÁ) S.A.

Panama


100
%*Professional Risk Management Services, Inc.

Delaware, U.S.A.


100
%


*The
common stock is owned 100% by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company.


---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3364]



[[Page 6160]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52

[AK14-7102b; FRL-5686-3]


Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Alaska

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of Alaska for the purpose of 
approving the 1990 base year carbon monoxide emission inventory portion 
of the Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska carbon monoxide (CO) State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on December 29, 1993, by the State 
of Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC). The SIP 
revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean 
Air Act requirements for the purpose of bringing about the attainment 
of the national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for CO. In the 
Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the 
State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal 
because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial revision amendment 
and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the 
approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no adverse comments 
are received in response to this proposed rule, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this rule. If the EPA receives adverse 
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public 
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period 
on this action.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by 
March 13, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Montel Livingston, 
Environmental Protection Specialist (OAQ-107), Office of Air Quality, 
at the EPA Regional Office listed below. Copies of the documents 
relevant to this proposed rule are available for public inspection 
during normal business hours at the following locations. The interested 
persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment 
with the appropriate office at least 24 hours before the visiting day.

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Office of Air Quality, 1200 
6th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, 410 Willoughby, Suite 
105, Juneau, Alaska 99801-1795.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Pavitt, EPA Region 10, Alaska 
Operations Office (AOO/A), 222 W. 7th Avenue, Box #19, Anchorage, AK 
99513-7588, (907) 271-5083.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: See the information provided in the Direct 
Final action which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: January 28, 1997.
Chuck Clarke,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. 97-3364 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
**EXHIBIT 15.2**

**Consent of Jun He Law offices, PRC Counsel**

June 27, 2011 

**AutoNavi Holdings Limited**

18/F, DahengScitech Mansion, South Section 

No. 3 Suzhou Street 

Haidian District 

Beijing 100080 

The People’s Republic of China 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

We hereby consent to the references to us by AutoNavi Holdings Limited (“the Company”) under the heading “Risks Related to Our CorporateStructure”, “Risks Related to Doing Business in China” and “Regulation” in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

Yours faithfully, 

For and on behalf of 

/s/ JUN HE LAW OFFICES
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

VERONICA RAMOS and ERVIN LOPEZ,

Appellants,

v.

ELIZABETH PEREZ-DIAZ, D.M.D. n/k/a Elizabeth Perks, D.M.D.; 

and JJP HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Appellees.

No. 2D23-533

March 22, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, 

Judge.

Donna Greenspan Solomon of Solomon Appeals, Mediation & Arbitration, 

Ft. Lauderdale, for Appellants.

Elizabeth S. Wheeler of Berg & Wheeler, P.A., Brandon, for Appellee 

Elizabeth Perez-Diaz, D.M.D.

No appearance for Appellee JJP Healthcare International, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) of OFS Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bilal Rashid, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



| |       | /s/ Bilal Rashid
| | ----- | ----------------
| | Name: | Bilal Rashid    
| | Date: | March 15, 2016
#### Neil F. LETTS, M. D., Petitioner, v. Charles W. DAVIS, Respondent.

No. 11-198.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 1978.

Victor M. Halbach, Jr., of Marks, Gray, Conroy & Gibbs, Jacksonville, for petitioner.

Steven A. Werber and David R. Lewis of Lewis, Paul, Isaac & Castillo, Jacksonville, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Petitioner seeks Writ of Certiorari to review the order of the Judicial Referee in a claim filed under the Medical Malpractice Reform Act. The Referee’s order terminated the panel by reason of expiration of certain time periods specified by statute. See Section 768.44, Florida Statutes.

The Judicial Referee was correct. The jurisdiction of the Medical Mediation Panel ceased when the case did not proceed within the time the statute mandates. See Rule 20.190, Florida Rules of Mediation Procedure.

There is a point we consider should be mentioned. We note that under the assignment of cases in many circuits, a judge other than the Judicial Referee to whom the case is assigned may undertake to perform acts on behalf of the Judicial Referee. We seriously question, without deciding, the validity of the practice.

CERTIORARI DENIED.

McCORD, C. J., BOYER, J., and McLANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.
#### Ronald GAY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. R-173.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 30, 1973.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and William C. Owen, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting Chief Judge, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ-, concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ISLE OF
CAPRI  CASINOS, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND RELATED NOTES TO SAID
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                       167972
<SECURITIES>                                 39044
<RECEIVABLES>                                 6650
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            238333
<PP&E>                                      699246
<DEPRECIATION>                              144346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1305514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       162036
<BONDS>                                     945501
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       304
<OTHER-SE>                                  155520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1305514
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            684850
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               279996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            291358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           60413
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              57528
<INCOME-TAX>                                 25473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          32055
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                984
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 31071
<EPS-BASIC>                                 1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.11


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Institute of Standards and Technology


Announcement of Meeting of National Conference on Weights and 
Measures

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Interim Meeting of the 
National Conference on Weights and Measures will be held January 11 
through 15, 1998, at the St. Anthony Hotel, San Antonio, TX. The 
meeting is open to the public. The National Conference on Weights and 
Measures is an organization of weights and measures enforcement 
officials of the States, counties, and cities of the United States, and 
private sector representatives. The interim meeting of the conference, 
as well as the annual meeting to be held next July (a notice will be 
published in the Federal Register prior to such meeting), brings 
together enforcement officials, other government officials, and 
representatives of business, industry, trade associations, and consumer 
organizations to discuss subjects that relate to the field of weights 
and measures technology and administration.
    Pursuant to (15 U.S.C. 272B), the National Institute of Standards 
and Technology acts as a sponsor of the National Conference on Weights 
and Measures in order to promote uniformity among the States in the 
complex of laws, regulations, methods, and testing equipment that 
comprises regulatory control by the States of commercial weighing and 
measuring.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 11-15, 1998.

Location of Meeting: St Anthony Hotel, San Antonio, TX.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dr. Gilbert Ugiansky, Executive Secretary, National Conference on 
Weights and Measures, P.O. Box 4025, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20885. 
Telephone: (301) 975-4004, or E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#305f475d705e5943441e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c435b416c42455f58024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 5, 1997.
Elaine Bunten-Mines,
Director, Program Office.
[FR Doc. 97-32699 Filed 12-15-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67824]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33851]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Olympic Provincial Interagency Executive Committee (PIEC), 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Olympic PIEC Advisory Committee will meet on January 29, 
1997 at the Skokomish Tribal Center located at N. 80 Tribal Center Road 
in Shelton, Washington. The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and 
continue until 3:00 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) Survey 
of Provincial Advisory Committees; (2) Update on Hood Canal District 
Programs; (3) Recreation Fee Demonstration; (4) Water Quality Planning; 
(5) Update on Olympic AMA Guide; and (6) Open Public Forum. Olympic 
Province Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens 
are encouraged to attend.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Kathy Snow, Province 
Liaison, USDA, Quilcene Ranger District, P.O. Box 280, Quilcene, WA 
98376, (360) 765-2211.

    Dated: December 19, 1997.
Ronald R. Humphrey,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-33851 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### UNITED STATES of America ex rel., Herbert Gilbert, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-15962.

D.C. No. CV-99-04534-MHP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*271Submitted Aug. 12, 2002 *.

Decided Aug. 16, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, and denies Gilbert’s request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Herbert Gilbert appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without leave to amend his *qui tam*action alleging that the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (“BART”) and others violated the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., by submitting to the federal government false information about BART’s ability to run trains safely more frequently. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s determination of subject matter jurisdiction, *United States ex rel. Aflatooni v. Kitsap Physicians Servs.,*163 F.3d 516, 520 (9th Cir.1999), and for clear error its findings of fact relevant to that determination, *id.*at 521.

The district court correctly determined that Gilbert’s complaint was based upon prior public disclosures, *see United States v. Alcan Elec. and Eng’g,*197 F.3d 1014, 1018 (9th Cir.1999) (holding that information revealed in prior litigation is publicly disclosed), and that Gilbert was not the original source of information, *see Aflatooni,*163 F.3d at 526 (explaining that a relator lacks true knowledge of alleged wrongdoing when his allegations are based purely on speculation and conjecture). Ac-eordingly, the district court properly dismissed Gilbert’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. *See Alcan,*197 F.3d at 1021.

The district court properly denied Gilbert’s motion for relief from judgment. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(a); 60(b)(l)-(3).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Genesis  Companies Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Madhava  Rao Mankal,  CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Madhava Rao Mankal
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Madhava Rao Mankal
Dated:  April 5, 2007
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136940 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n STACY J. SAZIMA, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices

v SC: 136940 COA: 281855 WCAC: 06-000269 SHEPHERD BAR & RESTAURANT and AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 17, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on November 19, 2008, at 9:30 a.m., on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the decision of the Wo rkers’ Compensation Appellate Commission is contrary to Simkins v General Moto rs Corp (After Remand) , 453 Mich 703, 723 (1 996). The parties may file supplemental briefs no later than November 12, 2008, on that issue. They should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

1014 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2008
Clerk