alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-01-1997
<CASH>                                          12,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (818)
<INVENTORY>                                     94,244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,000
<PP&E>                                         125,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                (53,549)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 339,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,842
<BONDS>                                         69,447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,549
<OTHER-SE>                                     133,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   339,740
<SALES>                                         53,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,488
<CGS>                                           29,458
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   461
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,651
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,387
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,264
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We have issued our reports dated March 4, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule and management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of K•Swiss Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the RegistrationStatements of K•Swiss Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-36505, effective August 23, 1990, File No. 33-77258, effective April 4, 1994, File No. 33-95650, effective August 10, 1995, File No. 333-79641, effectiveMay 28, 1999, File No. 333-91864, effective July 7, 2002, and File No. 333-122955, effective February 23, 2005) and on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-37895, effective October 17, 1997 and File No. 333-60043,effective August 5, 1998). 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 4, 2009
#### Richard L. MORRIS, Appellant, v. Beatrice T. MORRIS, Appellee.

No. 72-71.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 24, 1973.

Larkin & Larkin, Dade City, for appellant.

Brewton & Brewton, Dade City, for ap-pellee.

*203PIERCE, Judge (Ret.).

Appellant-defendant Richard L. Morris seeks review of an order denying his motion to dismiss and ordering, among other things, that the alimony in question was lump sum alimony in the amount of $5,200.00 payable in 208 weekly installments. We reverse.

Morris was the defendant in the original divorce action. Prior to the decree, the parties entered into a property settlement which provided that Morris would pay $25.-00 per week as alimony for four years to his wife, hut that said payments would terminate (1) if the wife remarried, or (2) if the wife removed herself from the State of Florida and remained outside Florida for a period of 180 continuous days. The court entered its final judgment of divorce on March 7, 1969, approving the conditions of the property settlement agreement except for the second condition.

On March 23, 1970, Morris filed his petition for modification of final judgment, based upon change of circumstances. The former wife did not argue change of circumstances, but instead argued that the award was a lump sum award. The court entered its order on August 6, 1970 denying Morris’ motion, giving no reasons for its order.

Morris made the weekly payments until his former wife died, and on September 22, 1971, the former wife’s Executrix, Josephine Ogden, filed her motion for an order of contempt for payments due after the death of the ex-wife. Morris’ motion to dismiss was denied. After hearing, the court entered its order, finding that the award of alimony was lump sum alimony; that the order of August 6, 1970, in effect, found that the final judgment granted lump sum alimony in the amount of $5,200.00 payable in 208 weekly installments of $25.00 each. The court ordered Morris to pay the arrearage of $900.00 within sixty days and to continue making the payments until he had complied with the final judgment and the orders of the court.

Lump sum alimony is a vested property right, Latta v. Latta, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 443, and therefore survives death, Payne v. Payne, Fla.App.1967, 201 So.2d 590; Van Boven v. First National Bank in Palm Beach, Fla.App.1970, 240 So.2d 329. Lump sum alimony may properly be payable in installments, but in the cases reviewed the amount awarded was for a *specific*sum to be paid in full, Chester v. Chester, Fla.App.1970, 241 So.2d 190; Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671.

In the case sub judice the amount awarded was not for a *specific*amount, since it was to be paid at the rate of $25.00 per week contingent upon the remarriage of the ex-wife.

Morris’ motion to dismiss should have been granted, and the judgment appealed is, therefore,

Reversed.

LILES, Acting C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Physics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Special Emphasis Panel in Physics (1208).
    Date and Time: Thursday, January 15, 1998 8:00am-5:00pm; Friday, 
January 16, 1998 8:00am-5:00pm.
    Place: Room 920, 4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marvin Goldberg, Program Director for 
Elementary Particle Physics, Division of Physics, Rm 1015, National 
Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 306-1894.
    Purpose of Meeting: To review proposals submitted to NSF for 
financial support, especially in experiments involving international 
collaborations.
    Agenda: Reviewing and evaluating Elementary Particle Physics 
proposals as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason for Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: December 22, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-33900 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
TREASURY ANNOUNCES MARKET FINANCING ESTIMATES 

Today, the Treasury Department announced net borrowing of marketable 

debt for the April - June 2005 and July - September 2005 quarters. 

Quarter 

Estimated 

Borrowing 

($ billion) 

Estimated 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billion) 

Apr-Jun 2005 ($42) $20 

Jul-Sep 2005 $103 $30 

Since 1997, the average absolute forecast error in net borrowing of 

marketable debt for the current quarter is $9 billion and the average absolute 

forecast error for the end-of-quarter cash balance is $9 billion. Similarly, the 

average absolute forecast error for the following quarter is $29 billion and 

the average absolute forecast error for the end-of-quarter cash balance is $11 

billion. 

The following tables reconcile the variation between forecasted and actual 

net borrowing of marketable debt in the January – March 2005 quarter. 

Quarter 

Estimated 

Borrowing 

($ billions) 

Actual 

Borrowing 

($ billions) 

Estimated 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billions) 

Actual 

End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

($ billions) 

Jan – Mar 2005 $147 $144 $10 $22 

Categories 

Chg from 

Nov Estimate 

Receipts +$4 

Outlays (1) 

Other +12 

Larger End-of-Quarter 

Cash Balance 

 (12) 

Additional financing details relating to Treasury’s Quarterly Refunding will 

be released at 9:00 A.M. on Wednesday, May 4.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 95-3341. Dennis L. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. FLORIDA HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATION, INC., a non-profit Florida corporation, Defendant-Appellant, Pinellas County School Board, in its official capacity, Defendant. Jan. 6, 1997. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. (No. 95-1407-CIV-T-24B), Susan C. Bucklew, Judge. Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM: Dennis Johnson, a student at Boca Ciega High School in Pinellas County, Florida became ineligible to participate in interscholastic football and wrestling because he had attained age 19 by August 31 of the school year. This age limit is in effect in many jurisdictions and, in Florida, is the subject of a bylaw of the Florida High School Activities Association, Inc., of which Boca Ciega High School and most other public and private secondary schools in Florida are members. Johnson sued FHSAA and the Pinellas County School Board seeking an injunction against enforcement of the 19-year rule and forbidding potential penalties against the school being penalized for allowing him to play. Johnson's claims were premised upon the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794 and the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Because of our disposition of the case we do notneed to address whether under 42 U.S.C. § 12132 FHSAA is a "public entity." The district court granted the relief sought. The Association has appealed. It is not disputed that meanwhile the football season and wrestling season have concluded with Johnson having participated in football, and he intends no further participation in high school athletics. We agree with the decision of the Seventh Circuit in Jordan v. Indiana High School Athletic Ass'n, Inc., 16 F.3d 785 (7th Cir.1994), that in this circumstance no case or controversy exists between Johnson and FHSAA. Johnson suggests that the case remains live because of the possibility that penalties might be enforced against the high school for having permitted Johnson to play pursuant to the district court's injunction. But the high school is not a party to this case. It does not appear that any penalty might be assessed against the Pinellas County School Board and, in any event, the Board did not join in the appeal to this

court. The "capable of repetition yet avoiding review" exception to mootness does not apply because it requires a reasonable expectation that the same complaining party would be subjected to the same action again, Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 102 S.Ct. 1181, 71 L.Ed.2d 353 (1982), and there is no such expectation here. The judgment of the district court is VACATED and the case is REMANDED with instructions to dismiss as moot.
May 06 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE FAA Docket 2014- 0886

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment of Section 333 Exemption Based upon Exemption 11204 

Issued to Build Imagery, LLC

Dear Sir or Madam,

Build Imagery LLC (Build Imagery) herewith applies to amend to our existing 

Exemption 11204 issued to Build Imagery on March 11,2015 in FAA Docket 2014-0886. 

The requested amendment would allow Build Imagery to operate the SOLO aircraft 

manufactured by 3D Robotics. It is our believe that the SOLO offers a more up to date 

flight control system as well as an improved on-board flight processors. This will 

improve flight characteristics and add to safe flight operations.

The name and contact information for the applicant are:

Daniel Ursitti

Build Imagery LLC

11870 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 106-433

West Los Angeles, CA

310-467-6006

Dursitti@Buildimagery.com

Build Imagery intends to operate the SOLO from 3D Robotics and will operate it in strict 

compliance with the conditions set forth in Exemption 11204. We understand that such 

conditions may be amended or modified by the FAA from time to time and we will look 

to the FAA for guidance, recommendations and modification to always adhere to best our 

flight operations and procedures. Build Imagery will maintain all of its original "Aerial 

Systems Operations Manuel" and "Flight Checklist" as displayed in 11204. We will 

additionally submit

1) SOLO Aircraft Description and Operations Manuel

The information contained in the above document is proprietary and not for public 

display. For that reason the above information will be submitted directly to 

333exemtion@faa.gov. 

These manuals are very similar to the manuals submitted by Build Imagery in support of

the issuance of Exemption 11204, the manuals will be updated by Build Imagery and or 

3D Robotics as needed to reflect any changes to Exemption 11204, based on amendments 

thereto.
To the extent necessary, Build Imagery refers the FAA to the original exemption 

submitted by Build Imagery in Docket FAA-2014-0886 for demonstration of the public 

interest and an equivalent level of safety. Build Imagery will operate the aircraft in strict 

compliance with the conditions in existing the exemption previously granted by the FAA.

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

Daniel Ursitti

Build Imagery

Dursitti@BuildImagery.com
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2488 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2488

     To prohibit United States contributions to the United Nations 
                            Population Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2021

Mr. Roy (for himself, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Mooney, Mr. LaMalfa, 
 Mr. Kelly of Mississippi, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Biggs, Mrs. 
 Greene of Georgia, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Babin, Mr. Jackson, Ms. Herrell, 
 Mr. Good of Virginia, Mr. Posey, Mr. Perry, Mr. Waltz, Mr. Rosendale, 
 Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Steube, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Clyde, Mr. Cawthorn, Mr. 
  Williams of Texas, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Budd, Mrs. 
 Boebert, Mr. Cloud, Mr. LaTurner, Mr. Graves of Louisiana, Mr. Rose, 
   Mr. Harris, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Latta, Mr. Mast, Mr. 
   Aderholt, Mr. Fulcher, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Hice of Georgia, and Mr. 
   Norman) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit United States contributions to the United Nations 
                            Population Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Taxpayer Funding for the U.N. 
Population Fund''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED 
              NATIONS POPULATION FUND.

    No funds available to the Department of State or any other 
department or agency may be used to provide contributions directly or 
indirectly to the United Nations Population Fund.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33553]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards Subcommittee Meeting on 
Human Factors; Revised

    The meeting of the ACRS Subcommittee on Human Factors scheduled to 
be held on January 20, 1998, Room T-2B3, 11545 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland has been rescheduled for Wednesday, January 21, 
1998, 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Notice of this meeting was previously 
published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, December 16, 1997. (62 FR 
65824). All other items pertaining to this meeting remain the same as 
previously published.
    For further information please contact the cognizant ACRS staff 
engineer, Mr. Noel F. Dudley (telephone 301/415-6888) between 7:30 a.m. 
and 4:15 p.m. (EST).

    Dated: December 17, 1997.
Gail H. Marcus,
Acting Deputy Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 97-33553 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### BRUCE-ESSEX SUPPLY CO., Inc., Appellant, v. COLACURTO, Jr., et ux., Appellees.

No. 70-1044.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
#### BOYETT’S SEPTIC TANK SERVICE, INC., and Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Appellants, v. David K. LIPHAM, Individually and for the use and benefit of United Services Automobile Association, Appellees.

No. GG-332.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 20, 1977.

W. Christopher Hart of Clark, Parting-ton, Hart & Hart, Pensacola, for appellants.

William R. Ptomey, Jr., Pensacola, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal questions the correctness of a partial summary judgment rendered in favor of appellees.

The record on appeal fails to conclusively establish that there was no genuine triable issue of a material fact under the issues as made by the complaint and the answer thereto. Under these circumstances, appel-lees were not entitled to a partial summary judgment as a matter of law, and the trial court erred in holding to the contrary.

*842The partial summary judgment appealed is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the purpose of receiving evidence on the issues as made by the pleadings, and rendering final judgment thereon.

Reversed and remanded.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor
Corporation.

| |                                                                                                                       
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Joseph Feldschuh, M.D.                                                                                            
| |                                                                                                                       
| | Joseph Feldshcuh                                                                                                      
| | President
 Chief Executive Officer
 Chairman of the Board of Directors
 Principal Executive Officer
 November 12, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Daxor Corporation and will be retained by Daxor Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


I, Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
     June 29, 2003 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements
     of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  August 13, 2003


                                     /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Reportof Compañía de Telecomunicaciones de Chile S.A. (the"Company") on Form 20-F for the period endingDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), I, ClaudioMuñoz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify that tothe best of our knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Date: June29, 2004

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--|-----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | By:  | /s/ ClaudioMuñoz                     |

|  |             |                     |
|--|-------------|---------------------|
|  | Name:  | ClaudioMuñoz |

|  |              |                        |
|--|--------------|------------------------|
|  | Title:  | ChiefExecutive Officer |

----
#### Robert KIMBLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 69-823.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 22, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.