alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Joseph E. Justice, certify that:
     1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ML Life InsuranceCompany of New York;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Dated: March 27, 2006      /s/ JOSEPH E. JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               FEB-06-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-08-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAY-02-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<CASH>                                1,342
<SECURITIES>                          5,445
<RECEIVABLES>                        53,962
<ALLOWANCES>                            411
<INVENTORY>                          16,968
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     85,588
<PP&E>                              245,197
<DEPRECIATION>                     (123,886)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      216,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                37,275
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                              7,044
<OTHER-SE>                           94,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        216,302
<SALES>                              73,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     73,354
<CGS>                                11,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        75,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,075
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (778)
<INCOME-TAX>                            272 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (506)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           (506)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.05)
        







</TABLE>
# Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-08-93

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

# Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P-08-93

A-002 In itial Review Engineering Report for

PMN P-08-93

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P-08-93

# A-001

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-08-93

# A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-08-93P08-0093 ETD IRER.PF3.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 08-0093

Post-Focus Draft Revision 3 9/16/2008

ENGINEER: Hall \ TKP

PV (kg/yr):

Revision Notes / Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt:

Respirator:

Health Effects:

TLV/PEL:

CRSS (12/03/2007):

Chemical Name:

S-H20:

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form:

End

Use:

Submitted data:

Page 1P08-0093 ETD IRER.PF3.txt

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (12/04/2007):

Migration to groundwater:

PBT rating: PBT

Health: 1-2 Inhalation,

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 60 ppb),

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 0-1

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claim:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:

Page 2P08-0093 ETD IRER.PF3.txt

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 08-0093

Manufacturing:

Number of Sites/ Location:

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Output 2:

to:

from:

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

negligible (VP < 0.001 torr)

Dermal:

Dermal - not required per SAT.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

Page 3P08-0093 ETD IRER.PF3.txt

PMN: 08-0093

Use:

Number of Sites/ Location:

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium. |

High End:

to:

from:

basis:

Conservative:

to:

from:

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

NOTE:

Page 4P08-0093 ETD IRER.PF3.txt

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

negligible (VP < 0.001 torr)

Dermal:

Dermal - not required per SAT.

CALL BY: Organization:

CALL TO:

Organization:

Date:

Time:

Phone:

-

Page 5

# A-003

Initial Review Exposur e Report

for PMN P-08-93
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-20610

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Kenneth Adams, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-389-1

______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Kenneth Adams appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty 

plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of 

methamphetamine, its salts, isomers, and salts of its isomers. The district 

court sentenced Adams to the top of the guidelines range of imprisonment. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 13, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-20610 Document: 54-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2024
No. 23-20610

2

Adams argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the 

district court improperly balanced the sentencing factors.

A sentence imposed within a properly calculated guidelines range is 

entitled to a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness. See United States v. 

Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). The presumption of reasonableness 

“is rebutted only upon a showing that the sentence does not account for a 

factor that should receive significant weight, it gives significant weight to an 

irrelevant or improper factor, or it represents a clear error of judgment in 

balancing sentencing factors.” Id.

Before imposing the sentence, the district court considered 

(1) Adams’s sentencing memorandum, which included requests for 

downward departures and a sentence outside of the guidelines range, (2) the 

Government’s motion for a downward departure, and (3) the parties’ 

arguments in favor of a lesser sentence. The district court imposed a 

sentence within the guidelines based on Adams’s criminal history.

Adams has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness. 

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-20610 Document: 54-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/13/2024
256 La. 908

#### In re Robert GLASS.

No. 50934.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Oct. 23, 1970.

In re: Robert Glass applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. There is no error in the ruling of the trial judge.
OAR Box 1781 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

122) IV-C-36 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 10/29/2008 10:46:23 AM Sheet 122 of 142 

P.1 
P.2 

*<*° Sr<V. 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

[ JSgrnsj °* Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

I ^V|/^Z / Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2771 

^ ^ SEP 28 1992 

Mr. David G. Hawkins 

Natural Resources Defense Council 

1350 New York Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Dear Mr. Hawkins: 

This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act 

(FOIA) Request of September 11, 1992, regarding certain 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents received from any 

person or entity outside the Federal government relating to 

materials prepared by the EPA in connection with the Agency's 

announced intention to "clarify" the current regulatory 

definition of best available control technology under the Clean 

Air Act, including comments on any draft proposed rules. Your 

request is being processed pursuant to our FOIA procedures and is 

identified by the number HQ-RIN-06397-92. 

I am enclosing a copy of a July 14, 1992 letter from 

Margaret A. Welsh, Acting Executive Director, Electric Generation 

Association, to William G. Rosenberg, Assistant Administrator for 

Air and Radiation, with comments on the draft proposed rule which 

is responsive to your request. There are no research or copying 

charges for this document. 

Sincerely, 

1/ John Calcagni jf 

tf~^ Director 

Air/Qualit /Qu< y Management Division 

Enclosure 
P.3 

lJ/f IS t 4 

^

t 0 sr<r*-

USE/ 

\r of 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 2771( 

SEP 28 1992 

Mr. David G. Hawkins 

Natural Resources Defense Council 

1350 New York Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Dear Mr. Hawkins: 

This is in response to your Freedom of Information Act 

(FOIA) Request of September 11, 1992, regarding certain 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents received from any 

person or entity outside the Federal government relating to 

materials prepared by the EPA in connection with the Agency's 

announced intention to "clarify" the current regulatory 

definition of best available control technology under the Clean 

Air Act, including comments on any draft proposed rules. Your 

request is being processed pursuant to our FOIA procedures and is 

identified by the number HQ-RIN-06397-92. 

I am enclosing a copy of a July 14, 1992 letter from 

Margaret A. Welsh, Acting Executive Director, Electric Generation 

Association, to William G. Rosenberg, Assistant Administrator for 

Air and Radiation, with comments on the draft proposed rule which 

is responsive to your request. There are no research or copying 

charges for this document. 

Sincerely, 

, I) /s tjJt^-J 

1/ John Calcagni jr 

\h*\ Director 

Air(Quality Management Division 

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67344-67345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Wyoming Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, that a meeting of 
the Wyoming Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 10:00 
a.m. and adjourn at 1:00 p.m. on Saturday, January 17, 1998, at the 
Hitching Post Inn, 1700 West Lincolnway, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001. The 
purpose of the

[[Page 67345]]

meeting is to brief the Committee on Commission and regional programs 
and approve plans for future activities.
    Persons desiring additional information, or planning a presentation 
to the Committee, should contact John Dulles, Director of the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office, 303-866-1400 (TDD 303-866-1049). Hearing-
impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services 
of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at 
least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission.

    Dated at Washington, DC, December 15, 1997.
Carol-Lee Hurley,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 97-33557 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

 We have issued our report dated January 29, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
 financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of K-Swiss Inc.
 on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the
 incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
 K-Swiss Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36505, effective August 23, 1990, File
 No. 33-77258, effective April 4, 1994, File No. 33-95650, effective August 10,
 1995 and File No. 333-79641, effective May 28, 1999) and on Form S-3 (File No.
 333-37895, effective October 17, 1997 and File No. 333-60043, effective July
 28, 1998).

 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

 Los Angeles, California
 January 29, 2002
815 A.2d 815

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, 100 Community Place, Suite 3301, Crownsville, Maryland 21032, Petitioner, v. John C. HARDWICK, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. AG No. 39,

Sept. Term, 2002.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Feb. 5, 2003.

ORDER

Upon review and consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension filed herein, it is this 5th day of February, 2003

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that John C. Hardwick, Jr. be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of John C. Hardwick, Jr. from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-713, shall certify that fact *690to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 17, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE AGREEMENTS


Availability of the Correlation: Textile and Apparel Categories 
With the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States for 1998

December 12, 1997.
AGENCY: Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lori E. Mennitt, International Trade 
Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, (202) 482-3400.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

    The Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements (CITA) 
announces that the 1998 Correlation, based on the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States, will be available either in December 
1997 or January 1998 as part of the Office of Textiles and Apparel 
(OTEXA) CD-Rom of publications.
    The CD-Rom may be purchased from the U.S. Department of Commerce, 
Office of Textiles and Apparel, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., room 
H3100, Washington, DC 20230, ATTN: Barbara Anderson, at a cost of $25. 
Checks or money orders should be made payable to the U.S. Department of 
Commerce.
Troy H. Cribb,
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. 97-32899 Filed 12-16-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-F
EXHIBIT
12.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 EXCHANGE
ACT RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I,
Jianfeng Liu, certify that:
  1.      I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 20-F of Lizhan Environmental Corporation;
  2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
  3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
  4.      The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and have:
  (a)        Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;
  (b)        [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC
Release Nos. 33-8238/34-47986 and 33-8392/34-49313];
  (c)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
  (d)           Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting; and
  5.      The registrant’s other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
  (a)        All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
  (b)        Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
   Date:
      February 1, 2011
                /s/    JIANFENG
      LIUJianfeng LiuChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 22


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


1.       Swift Transportation Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

2.       Swift Leasing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

3.       Common Market Distributing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

4.       Sparks Finance Co., Inc., a Nevada corporation

5.       Cooper Motor Lines, Inc., a South Carolina corporation

6.       Common Market Equipment Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

7.       Swift Transportation Co. of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation

8.       Swift of Texas Co., Inc., a Texas corporation

9.       Swift Logistics Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

10.      Swift Transportation Corporation, a Nevada Corporation
#### VOLKSWAGEN INSURANCE COMPANY v. Richard D. RUSS.

No. 45954.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 16, 1970.

Bryant & Stennis, Gulfport, for appellant.

Sam P. Cooper, Jr., Picayune, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 244 (Friday, December 19, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 66666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated June 9, 1997, and published in Federal Register on 
June 17, 1997, (62 FR 32824), Damocles10, 3529 Lincoln Highway, 
Thorndale, Pennsylvania 19372, made application by renewal to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk 
manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed 
below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Drug                               Schedule        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heroin (9200)................................  I                        
Codeine (9050)...............................  II                       
Hydromorphone (9150).........................  II                       
Hydrocodone (9193)...........................  II                       
Morphine (9300)..............................  II                       
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances for 
the purpose of deuterium labeled internal standards for distribution to 
analytical laboratories.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Damocles10 to 
manufacture the listed controlled substances is consistent with the 
public interest at this time. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823 CFR 
0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 
Diversion Control, hereby orders that the application submitted by the 
above firm for registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes 
of controlled substances listed above is granted.

    Dated: December 1, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-33116 Filed 12-18-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
#### ORANGE LTD., CO., Appellant, v. The HAMMET COMPANY INC., etc., et al., Appellees. The HAMMET COMPANY, INC., and William L. Gunter, Appellants, v. ORANGE LTD., CO., a Florida corporation, and Tropicana Products., Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

Nos. 72-1080, 72-1130.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 5, 1973.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brevard County; Valie A. Williams, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.