32006 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 105 / Thursday, May 31, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

the Treasury and General Government 

Appropriations Act, 1999, Public Law 

105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998). 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act 

The Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. 

L. 104–121) provides generally for 

congressional review of agency rules. A 

reporting requirement is triggered in 

instances where NCUA issues a final 

rule as defined by Section 551 of the 

APA. 5 U.S.C. 551. The Office of 

Management and Budget has 

determined that this rule is not a major 

rule for purposes of the Small Business 

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 

1996. 

Dated: By the National Credit Union 

Administration Board on May 24, 2012. 

Mary F. Rupp, 

Secretary of the Board. 

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth 

in the preamble, IRPS 12–1 amends 

IRPS 11–1 as follows: 

Note: The following ruling will not appear 

in the Code of Federal Regulations. 

■ 1. Authority: Section 309 of the Riegle 

Community Development and 

Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994, 

Pub. L. 103–325. 

■ 2. Amend the third paragraph in 

subpart A to read as follows: 

Material supervisory determinations 

are limited to: (1) Composite CAMEL 

ratings of 3, 4, and 5 and all component 

ratings of those composite ratings; (2) 

adequacy of loan loss reserve 

provisions; and (3) loan classifications 

on loans that are significant as 

determined by the appealing credit 

union. Subject to the requirements 

discussed below, credit unions may also 

appeal to the Committee a decision of 

the Director of the Office of Small Credit 

Union Initiatives (OSCUI) to deny 

Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) 

reimbursements. 

■ 3. Remove the 7th paragraph in 

subpart A. 

■ 4. Revise the last paragraph in subpart 

A to read as follows: 

Committee decisions on the denial of 

a TAG reimbursement are the final 

decisions of NCUA and are not 

appealable to the NCUA Board. All 

other appealable decisions must be 

appealed to the NCUA Board within 30 

days of the appellant’s receipt by the 

party of the Committee’s decision. 

[FR Doc. 2012–13210 Filed 5–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7535–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 25 

[Docket No. NM438 Special Conditions No. 

25–423–SC] 

Special Conditions: Gulfstream Model 

GVI Airplane; High Incidence 

Protection 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final special conditions; 

correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects an 

error that appeared in Docket No. 

NM438, Special Conditions No. 25– 

423–SC, which were published in the 

Federal Register on March 28, 2011. 

The error resulted in the omission of 

two paragraphs of text in The Special 

Conditions section. 

DATES: Effective May 31, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe 

Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane and Flight 

Crew Interface Branch, ANM–111, 

Transport Standards Staff, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; 

telephone (425) 227–2011; facsimile 

(425) 227–1320. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

document designated as ‘‘Docket No. 

NM438, Special Conditions No. 25– 

423–SC’’ was published in the Federal 

Register on March 28, 2011 (76 FR 

17022). The document issued special 

conditions pertaining to a high 

incidence protection system that 

replaces the stall warning system during 

normal operating conditions, prohibits 

the airplane from stalling, limits the 

angle of attack at which the airplane can 

be flown during normal low speed 

operations, and cannot be overridden by 

the flight crew. These special conditions 

were, and continue to be applicable to, 

Gulfstream Model GVI airplanes. 

As published, the document 

contained an error because paragraphs 

3(e)(6) and 3(e)(7) were omitted. Due to 

its complexity the entire text of 

paragraph 3(e) is included below, 

including paragraphs 3(e)(6) and 3(e)(7). 

3. Minimum Steady Flight Speed and 

Reference Stall Speed—In lieu of the 

requirements of § 25.103, the following 

special condition is issued: 

(e) VSR must be determined with the 

following conditions: 

(1) Engines idling, or, if that resultant 

thrust causes an appreciable decrease in 

stall speed, not more than zero thrust at 

the stall speed. 

(2) The airplane in other respects 

(such as flaps and landing gear) in the 

condition existing in the test or 

performance standard in which VSR is 

being used. 

(3) The weight used when VSR is 

being used as a factor to determine 

compliance with a required 

performance standard. 

(4) The center of gravity position that 

results in the highest value of reference 

stall speed. 

(5) The airplane trimmed for straight 

flight at a speed selected by the 

applicant, but not less than 1.13 VSR and 

not greater than 1.3 VSR. 

(6) The high incidence protection 

function disabled, or adjusted to a high 

enough incidence to allow full 

development of the maneuver to the 

angle of attack corresponding to VSR. 

(7) From the stabilized trim condition, 

apply the longitudinal control to 

decelerate the airplane so that the speed 

reduction does not exceed one knot per 

second. 

Since no other part of the regulatory 

information has been changed, the 

special conditions are not being 

republished. 

Correction 

In Final special conditions document 

[FR Doc. 2011–7144 Filed 3–25–11; 8:45 

a.m.] published on March 28, 2011 (76 

FR 17022), make the following 

correction: 

On page 17024, in the first column, 

which begins with (e), include the 

following paragraphs after (5) and before 

(f): 

(6) The high incidence protection 

function disabled, or adjusted to a high 

enough incidence to allow full 

development of the maneuver to the 

angle of attack corresponding to VSR. 

(7) From the stabilized trim condition, 

apply the longitudinal control to 

decelerate the airplane so that the speed 

reduction does not exceed one knot per 

second. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 18, 

2012. 

Michael J. Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2012–13213 Filed 5–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES1