alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Swift Transportation Co., Inc.:


We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  Registration  Statements  No.
33-66034  and  333-20651  on Form  S-3 and in the  Registration  Statements  No.
33-85940, 33-85942 and 33-85944 on Form S-8 of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. of
our report dated  February  12, 1999,  except as to Note 18 which is as of March
15, 1999,  relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Swift  Transportation
Co.,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,  and the related
consolidated  statements of earnings,  stockholders'  equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report
appears  in  the  December  31,  1998  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  Swift
Transportation Co., Inc.

                                              KPMG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 17, 1999
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2437 

To extend to May 17 the first scheduled individual estimated tax payment 

for 2021. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2021 

Mr. SMUCKER (for himself, Mr. GRIFFITH, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. BACON, Mr. 

ROSE, Mr. EMMER, Mr. CARL, Mr. HERN, Mr. MEUSER, and Mr. VAN

DREW) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend to May 17 the first scheduled individual estimated 

tax payment for 2021. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELAY OF FIRST SCHEDULED INDIVIDUAL ES4 TIMATED TAX PAYMENT FOR 2021. 

5 In the case of any taxable year beginning in 2021, 

6 the second column of the table in section 6654(c)(2) of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied by 

8 substituting ‘‘May 17’’ for ‘‘April 15’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Herbert JOSEPH.

No. 53404.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 24, 1973.

Robert J. Adams, Kenneth P. Mayers, Lafayette Parish Indigent Defender Program, Lafayette, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., LeRoy A. Hartley, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Nathan Stansbury, Dist. Atty., Ronald E. Dauterive, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.

SANDERS, Chief Justice.

Herbert Joseph was convicted of aggravated rape, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:42, and sentenced to life imprisonment. He now appeals his conviction and sentence, relying upon a single bill of exceptions.

The bill was reserved when, at the trial, a witness for the state was shown certain items of clothing and, in response to the State’s questions, identified them as those worn by the rape victim. The objection raised by the defense and overruled by the court was that the State should have tested the witness’ remembrance of the victim’s clothing before the articles were exhibited.

The record affirmatively reflects, however, that the witness had already testified before the identification that the victim was wearing black pants and a long sleeved white sweater. We also note that the victim, herself, took the stand and positively identified the garments as those she was wearing on the night of the rape. The garments were introduced into evidence without objection.

*243Considering these circumstances, we find no merit in the bill of exceptions.

An examination of the proceedings discloses no error patent on the face of the record that we note in the absence of a bill of exceptions. See LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 920.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Order filed December 2 9 , 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 20

- 00791

- CV

____________ GALVAN, THOMAS (D/B/A TOM'S TRUCKING) , Appellant

V. AMISTAD GROUP, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 13222



### O R D E R The notice of appeal in this case was filed November 20, 2020. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by
statute or the Te xas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the c lerk
of this court on or before January 8 , 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Hassan.
**Exhibit23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-66738, 33-86946,33-92878, 33-95050, 33-98170, 333-01632, 333-15655, 333-29431, 333-58605, 333-62828, 333-92160,333-108160, 333-13561 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 31, 2008, related to the financialstatements and financial statement schedules of PetSmart, Inc. and subsidiaries, and theeffectiveness of PetSmart, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PetSmart, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year endedFebruary 3, 2008./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPPhoenix, Arizona
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 5 (Wednesday, January 8, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1101-1102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[Docket No. RP97-214-000]


Florida Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Filing of Report of 
Cash-Out Activity

January 3, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 31, 1996, Florida Gas Transmission

[[Page 1102]]

Company (FGT) tendered for filing schedules detailing certain 
information related to the Cash-Out mechanism from December 1, 1995 
through September 30, 1996. No tariff changes are proposed therein.
    FGT states that Section 19.1 of the General Terms and Conditions 
(GTC) of its FERC Gas Tariff provides for on Annual Report containing 
an accounting for of costs and revenues associated with the Cash-Out 
Mechanism, Fuel Recovery Mechanism and various Balancing Tools provided 
for in FGT's Tariff. FGT states the instant filing is made in 
compliance with those provisions.
    FGT proposes to directly refund $1,227,048 of excess revenues to 
shippers identified in Schedule B to FGT's filing. FGT proposes to make 
these refunds within 30 days following a final Commission Order 
accepting the filing.
    Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should 
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20426, 
in accordance with Sections 385.214 and 385.211 of the Commission's 
Rules and Regulations. All such motions or protests should be filed on 
or before January 10, 1997. Protests will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate actions to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceedings. Any person 
wishing to become a party must file a motion to intervene. Copies of 
this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for 
public inspection.
Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-373 Filed 1-7-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
#### Willard SAPP, Appellant, v. Mildred RICHARDSON, Appellee.

No. M-63.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

Feb. 3, 1970.

Blalock, Holbrook, Lewis, Paul & Bennett, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Boyd, Jenerette & Leemis, Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff seeks reversal of an adverse judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in a negligence suit arising out of a traffic accident which occurred on a divided four-lane highway. The principal thrust of appellant’s case is that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to include in his instructions to the jury a charge on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Upon consideration of the record on appeal and the briefs and arguments of counsel, it is our opinion that the omission of the requested instruction was not error in view of the facts and circumstances of the case. We have considered the other points raised on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and SPECTOR, JJ„ concur.
[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 1998)]
[Notices]
[Page 228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-34237]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:02 a.m. on 
Tuesday, December 30, 1997, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider a 
matter relating to the Corporation's supervisory activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director 
Joseph H. Neely (Appointive), seconded by Ms. Julie Williams, acting in 
the place and stead of Director Eugene A. Ludwig (Comptroller of the 
Currency), concurred in by Director Ellen S. Seidman (Director, Office 
of Thrift Supervision), and Acting Chairman Andrew C. Hove, Jr., that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matter on less 
than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the 
meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require 
consideration of the matter in a meeting open to public observation; 
and that the matter could be considered in a closed meeting by 
authority of subsections (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii) of 
the ``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(4), (c)(6), 
(c)(8), and (c)(9)(A)(ii)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: December 30, 1997.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-34237 Filed 12-31-97; 10:44 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 06/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                         275,787
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,838,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                    96,976
<INVENTORY>                                  5,197,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,372,100
<PP&E>                                       5,069,989
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,355,882
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,586,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,726,389
<BONDS>                                        125,869
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,328
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,170,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,586,106
<SALES>                                      9,163,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,163,898
<CGS>                                        6,159,445
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,159,445
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,304,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                47,944
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             591,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,859,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,859,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,859,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.40)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.19

 

2013 Bonus Plan

 

·                  Bonus Pool is funded by achievement of corporate plan, with pro-rata payment for achievement between 50% -100% and between 100% - 150%.

 

·                  Individual performance will be measured by CEO evaluation of executive’s demonstration of Leadership, Leverage and Results and specific MBOs established by the CEO, and be included in CEO’s recommendation to the Compensation Committee.

 

·                  Maximum plan funding is 150% of target but individual bonus awards can exceed 150% of target with CEO recommendation and with Compensation Committee approval.

 

·                  The Compensation Committee will establish for each executive a target bonus expressed as a percentage of his annual salary.

 

·                  Revenue and EBITDA targets will be based on the performance tiers described below. The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to reasonably adjust the Revenue and EBITDA targets to exclude the impact of any dispositions and acquisitions or other corporate events during the plan year, as it deems appropriate.

 

Bonus Pool Funding

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Performance Tiers
    	
 
    
	
Corporate Plan
    	
 
    	
Plan
   Weight
    	
 
    	
Threshold
   50% Payout if results
    above following but
    below plan/target
    	
 
    	
Target
    100% Payout Target
    	
 
    	
Stretch
    150% Payout Target
    	
 
    
	
Revenue 
    	
 
    	
60
    	
%
    	
91% of plan
    	
 
    	
100% of plan
    	
 
    	
109% of plan
    	
 
    
	
EBITDA 
    	
 
    	
20
    	
%
    	
83% of plan
    	
 
    	
100% of plan
    	
 
    	
117% of plan
    	
 
    
	
Discretionary   evaluation and MBOs from CEO
    	
 
    	
20
    	
%
    	
TBD
    	
 
    	
TBD
    	
 
    	
TBD
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7088 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7088

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 11, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, as the ``Senator Jack Hill 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATOR JACK HILL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Senator Jack Hill Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Senator 
Jack Hill Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 10, 2020.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered January 24, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01191
- CV
HENRY STEPHENSON BYR D, MD, ET AL, Appellant s V. ROLANDA HUTTON AND B RYAN HUTTON, Appell ee s On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 15886



### O RDER Before the Court is appellees’ January 22, 2020 unopposed motion for a seven - day extension of time to file their brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than February 5, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              THIS   SCHEDULE    CONTAINS   SUMMARY    FINANCIAL
                              INFORMATION    EXTRACTED    FROM   THE   FINANCIAL
                              STATEMENTS   AS  OF  DECEMBER   31,  1996  AND  IS
                              QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
                              STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                                                863557
<NAME>                        SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                                1,210
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        78,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           3,997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     95,904
<PP&E>                                              370,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                       95,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      380,605
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                58,966
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 42
<OTHER-SE>                                          226,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        380,605
<SALES>                                             562,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    562,259
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       508,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (739)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    7,106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      47,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                         19,790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  27,422
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         27,422
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .71
        
<FN>
EPS-PRIMARY  and  EPS-DILUTED  are  restated to include the impact of  Financial
Accounting  Standards  Board Statement No. 128 and the effect of a 3-for-2 stock
split payable on March 12, 1998.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<PAGE> 21

                                                                  Exhibit 12


              AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                (Unaudited)




                                                        Three Months Ended
                                                             March 31,
                                                        2001          2000
                                                      (dollars in thousands)

Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $102,247      $ 93,651
  Interest expense                                     172,188       163,141
  Implicit interest in rents                             4,195         3,966

Total earnings                                        $278,630      $260,758


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $172,188      $163,141
  Implicit interest in rents                             4,195         3,966

Total fixed charges                                   $176,383      $167,107


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        1.58          1.56
IIB 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2324 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2022 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2800 South Adams Street in Tallahassee, 

Florida, as the ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2324 RFS

1 SECTION 1. D. EDWINA STEPHENS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2800 South Adams Street in Tal4 lahassee, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘D. Edwina Stephens 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 8, 

2022. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS