alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CORRECTED COPY

The FAA is reissuing the letter dated July 2 nd . A correction was made to add the “What You

Should Do ” section. Below is the letter that includes the change. We made the correction in

our records as of July 6, 2015.

July 2 , 2015

Mr. Andrew O’Fee

8126 Meadow Glen Drive

Germantown, TN 38138

Dear Mr. O’Fee :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains w hy we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 30 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0840 ),

but we are unable to process your request any furthe r. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the e xtent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or ho w the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If W e Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst , Ai rmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
##### 



Exhibit 23 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Swift Transportation Co., Inc: We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-114257, 333-60970, 333-16865,
333-20651 and 333-66034 on Form S-3 of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-117728, 333-117727, 333-98581, 333-85948, 333-53566, 333-31067, 333-64910,
333-66770 and 333-81403 on Form S-8 of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. of our reports dated March
8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
comprehensive income, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2004, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004, annual
report on Form 10-K of Swift Transportation Co., Inc. /s/ KPMG LLPKPMG LLP Phoenix, Arizona
March 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 21

| Name of Company                      | State of Incorporation | Percentage of Voting Equity Interests Owned |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                   |                                        |
| Artesian Resources Corporation       | Delaware               |                                        |
| Artesian Water Company, Inc.         | Delaware               | 100                                         |
| Artesian Water Pennsylvania, Inc.    | Pennsylvania           | 100                                         |
| Artesian Water Maryland, Inc.        | Delaware               | 100                                         |
| Artesian Development Corporation     | Delaware               | 100                                         |
| Artesian Wastewater Management, Inc. | Delaware               | 100                                         |
| Artesian Wastewater Maryland, Inc.   | Delaware               | 100                                         |
| Artesian Utility Development, Inc.   | Delaware               | 100                                         |
| Artesian Consulting Engineers, Inc.  | Delaware               | 100                                         |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Equivalent of Birds
Eye Foods, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 24, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on November
4, 2005, and as amended by the Form 10-Q/A Equivalent (Amendment No. 1) filed
with the Commission on March 20, 2006 (collectively, the "Report"), I, Earl L.
Powers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Date: March 29, 2006                         /s/ Earl L. Powers
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Executive Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer and
                                                   Secretary
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)

                                        8
255 La. 799

#### Phillip J. CARDINALE, Jr. v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50465.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 30, 1970.

In re: Phillip J. Cardinale, Jr. applying for writs of habeas corpus, certiorari, and review, and stay order.

Application not considered. There is no compliance with the rules of this court, which makes it impossible for us to pass upon it.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21

- 0280 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DANIEL GEORGE RICHARDS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until October 22 , 2021, to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 15 2021

09/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0280
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SCOTTWHITTINGTON, ) ) ) ) 

### Plaintiff, 

### v. ) Civil Case No. 07-2135 (RJL) ) 

### UNITED STATES, )

hereby ) 

### Defendant. ) 

### ORDn-- (JuneL, 2012) Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is 

### ORDEREDthat the United States' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #27] is GRANTED; and it is further 

### ORDEREDthat the remaining counts ofplaintiff's Amended Complaint [Dkt. #14] are DISMISSED. 

### SO ORDERED.
United States District Judge
2013.12.31 EX 10.10






EXHIBIT 10.10


Summary Description of the Compensation of
Non-Employee Directors of TETRA Technologies, Inc.


On November 6, 2013, the Board of Directors elected to modify the amounts of monthly cash retainers that were effective as of January 1, 2011, paid to directors who are not officers or employees of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (Non-Employee Directors), effective December 1, 2013. Directors who are also officers or employees of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (the Company) do not receive any compensation for duties performed as Directors.


As of December 1, 2013, Non-Employee Director other than our Chairman of the Board, Ralph S. Cunningham, receives the following cash compensation: 
		
	•
	Monthly cash retainer of $4,167. 


		
	•
	Meeting fees of $1,500 for each Board meeting attended. In addition, members of the Audit Committee, Management and Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive meeting fees of $1,500 for each committee meeting attended. All meeting fees are payable on the date of the meeting. 




As of December 1, 2013, Dr. Cunningham receives a monthly cash retainer of $11,000. Dr. Cunningham receives no additional compensation for attending meetings of the committees or the Board or for serving as our Chairman of the Board. Additional annual cash retainers of $10,000 are paid to the chairmen of the Management and Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. An additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 is paid to the chairman of the Audit Committee. All additional cash retainer amounts are payable in quarterly installments. 


Equity Compensation. On May 20, 2013, each Non-employee Director serving as of that date, including Dr. Cunningham, received an award of 9,709 shares of restricted stock with an aggregate grant date fair market value of $100,003. Twenty-five percent of the shares of restricted stock so awarded vested on the date of grant, and additional 25% portions of the award vested on August 20 and November 20, 2013 and February 20, 2014. It is anticipated that future compensation arrangements approved by the Board of Directors will include awards of grants of approximately $100,000 in value of restricted stock to each Non-employee Director on an annual basis, to be awarded on or about May 20 of each year.
 
Reimbursement of Expenses. All Non-Employee Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket travel expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board and committees (including travel expenses of spouses if they are invited by the Company).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6957
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-262-A, CA-97-382-AM) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have sixty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).The district court entered its order on March 21, 1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on May 26, 1997, which is beyond the sixty-day appeal period. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c). Appellant'sfailure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Terrence Odell WATSON, Appellant.

No. 02-1442.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 20, 2002.

Filed Aug. 28, 2002.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Terrence Odell Watson (Watson) appeals his sentence. Watson pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute in excess of 50 grams of cocaine base and 125 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. The presentence report assigned Watson five criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4A1 (2001), resulting in a criminal history category of III, but the district court1 departed downward under section 4A1.3 to a criminal history category of II, finding category III overstated the seriousness of Watson’s past criminal conduct. Although Watson’s sentencing range was then 97-121 months, the amount of drugs involved triggered a *68statutory mandatory minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment. *See 21*U.S.C. § 841(b)(1).

Watson argues the district court should have departed downward to category I, and he would then have been eligible for a sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum sentence under the safety valve reduction of section 5C1.2. To qualify for safety valve relief, a defendant may not be charged with more than one criminal history point as determined under section 4A1.1. *See*U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(l) & application note 1. Because Watson was properly charged with five criminal history points under section 4A1, he does not qualify for the safety valve reduction under section 5C1.2. *See United States v. Langmade,*236 F.3d 931, 932 (8th Cir.2001); *United States v. Webb,*218 F.3d 877, 881-82 (8th Cir. 2000); *see also United States v. Heilmann,*235 F.3d 1146, 1148 (8th Cir.2001).

We therefore affirm the sentence. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINNCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF ADAM SOFTWARE, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,479
<SECURITIES>                                     7,586
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                       144
<INVENTORY>                                        492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,749
<PP&E>                                           2,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,594
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,082
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,308
<SALES>                                          1,801
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,801
<CGS>                                              312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    272
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                197
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       197
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
#### Lois M. SMITH v. The NATIONAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INS. CO.

No. 61181.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: The National Life and Accident Insurance Co. applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit. Parish of Orleans. 351 So.2d 217.

Writ denied.
Support Documents for 

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on 

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) 

P-04-338 

EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0577 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 35
Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for 

PMN P-04-338 

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for 

PMN P-04-338 

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for 

PMN P-04-338 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 35
A-001 

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-04-338 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 35
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 35
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 35
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 35
A-002 

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-04-338 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 35
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 35
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 35
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 35
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 35
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 35
A-003 

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-04-338 

EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 35
EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 35
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 35
EXHIBIT 10.70

EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT 

Finite #195-020
Vendor #000-404-285

THIS
EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT (Eighth Amendment) is made as of
September 1, 2003 by and between SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., a New York corporation
(Sears), and CONSUMER PROGRAMS INCORPORATED, a Missouri corporation
(Licensee).

REFERENCE
is made to the License Agreement made and entered into as of January 1, 1999, as
previously amended (the License Agreement) by and between Sears and Licensee
for the sale of products and services (the Licensed Business) at On Premises
locations.

WHEREAS,
Sears and Licensee desire to add the commission structure for Non-Portrait Sales to
Exhibit C/A of the License Agreement;

NOW,
THEREFORE, Sears and Licensee agree as follows:

1.   Any and all terms and  definitions  used herein  shall have the same meaning as set forth in the License  Agreement  unless
otherwise               indicated herein.

        2.   The parties agree that the following is hereby added to the Definitions set forth in Exhibit C/A:


                                4.    "Non-Portrait Sales" shall mean portrait-related retail merchandise (e.g., frames, mats, albums, greeting cards).

        3.   The parties agree that the following is added as Section D to Exhibit C/A:

              D.  Non-Portrait Sales
                                  Licensee  shall pay Sears  commissions  annually on all  Non-Portrait  Sales made
 pursuant to the License Agreement                     (the  "Commission") as follows:

                    1.  15% of Net Sales for all Non-Portrait Sales less than or equal to $8,000,000.
                    2.  10% of Net Sales for all Non-Portrait Sales greater than $8,000,000 and less than or equal to $12,000,000.
                    3.  7% of Net Sales for all Non-Portrait Sales greater than $12,000,000.

Except as expressly modified by this
Eighth Amendment, all other provisions of the License Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect. To the extent that the terms of this Eighth Amendment are inconsistent with
any of the terms of the License Agreement, the terms of this Eighth Amendment shall
supercede and govern.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Sears and Licensee have signed this Eighth Amendment as of the date set
forth above by their duly authorized officers and agents.

| |      | SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
| | ---- | ----------------------
| |      |                       
| | By:  | /s/ John Pigott       
| |      | John Pigott           
| | Its: | Vice President        

| |      | CONSUMER PROGRAMS INCORPORATED
| | ---- | ------------------------------
| |      |                               
| | By:  | /s/ Jack Krings               
| |      | Jack Krings                   
| | Its: | Vice President
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS S E C O N D D I S T R I C T O F T E X A S CHIEF JUSTICE BONNIE SUDDERTH
JUSTICES ELIZABETH KERR J. WADE BIRDWELL DABNEY BASSEL DANA WOMACK MIKE WALLACH BRIAN WALKER TIM CURRY CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER 401 W. BELKNAP, SUITE 9000 FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76196-0211 TEL: (817) 884-1900 FAX: (817) 884-1932 www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa CLERK DEBRA SPISAK
CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY LISA M. WEST
GENERAL COUNSEL CLARISSA HODGES
July 28, 2022
Brian Salvant The Salvant Law Firm 610 E. Weatherford Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Julie Lugo Tarrant County District Attorney's Office 401 W Belknap St Fort Worth, TX 76196-0201 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Hon. Jamie Graves Cummings Judge, County Criminal Court No. 5 Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center 401 W. Belknap St. Fort Worth, TX 76137 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Criminal County Clerk, Tarrant County Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center 401 W. Belknap St., 2nd Floor Fort Worth, TX 76196-4401 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * Joseph W. Spence Assistant Criminal District Attorney Tim Curry Criminal Justice Center 401 W. Belknap St. Fort Worth, TX 76196-0201 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Hon. David L. Evans Regional Presiding Judge Tom Vandergriff Civil Courts Building 100 N. Calhoun, 4th Floor Fort Worth, TX 76196 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Court of Appeals Number: 02-21-00201-CR, 02-21-00202-CR Trial Court Case Number: 1609086, 1609087 Style: Dominique A. Smith
v. The State of Texas Today the Second Court of Appeals issued an opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause. Copies of the opinion and judgment are attached and can also be viewed on our Court’s webpage at: http://www.txcourts.gov/2ndcoa

.02-21-00201-CR

July 28, 2022 Page 2 Respectfully yours, DEBRA SPISAK, CLERK