alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## 826

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  **GROVERSELLERS ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL**
xionorabie u. **A.** Davis State Registrar ..A Texas State Board of Iieaith i **Austin** 2, Texas
“\ Deer **sir:** Oplnlon lot;.-o-&s :. Re: Name..ol’ lilegltlmate child born lU’%tlllbipth. Wehave your letter w’ff ’cillowsr

“The question freQuentlg erl8er as to the surname0r en lllegltlmate, 8a 1s **shown** la a **quotation** from Mr. Bernhagen, **RegSstr\ap** ofbirths and deaths in Beaumont, Texas: ‘?~ * ‘,/

.,.. . ....\

“‘A cud vgs born here ln.,Beaumont, the birth happening to b,e a st¶Jlblrth. The mother of the child vas a vidov, her husband having Aled:more than a year ago, The Infirmary, 8t vhlch the birth occurred, llsted-&he birth as 1lIegitlmate but they vere

,,.bdeoided as to vbat nameto give the infant ’ -- whether thb chlldrs surname should be the mother’s maiden surname or her widowed husband’s -name.’ ‘\ I, ‘\ ‘.,, ‘It ii no8 myintention to argue the ease, but the birth record calls, la item 2, for the full nameof the child; item 8, for the full name of the father; and in item 14, the full maiden name of the mother

.

“In the case mentioned by Mr. Bernhagen, slnoe the records shov that the father is dead, the child 1s lllegltlmste end the certificate ~111 be SOvritten. The widow carries the nameof her former husbend. According to a previous oplnlon issued by

## 827

Honorable W. **A.** Davis, page 2

your department, the ohlld takes the surname of its mother, but in such cases as this, to place the lather’s surname 8a the surname 03’the child **vould** violate Paragraph 25, Rule 448, Article 4477, V.T.S. ln **tb8t** the **8urnama of**  the child, in this caue, vould be 8t least soms lnformatlon by vhioh the rather right be identlried.

“Please advise m8what the 8urnam8 should be in ouch 08~88 as that described above." Rule 398 of Article 4477, Revised Civil Statutes, provides **in** pert as follovs:

“That a stillborn child shall be registered as a birth ami also as a death, and separate certiflcates of both the birth and the death ehall be filed with the local registrar, la the usual form end manner, the oertlficate of birth to COnt8lQ 1Q place of the name of the child, the word 'stillbirth’; provided, that a certlrioate of birth and a certificate of death shall not be required for a child that has **not** 8dvaQOed to the fifth month of uterogestatlon. . . ." We think this plain language of the rtatute disposes of your question, and that it 1s unnecessary to give the child 8ny name at all. **Very truly**  **yours** ATTORNEX GFJUWAOF TEXAS

EH: db
#### Randy Louis RICH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-640.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Brevard County; Joe A. Cowart, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from United
Investors Income Properties II 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000862028
<NAME> UNITED INVESTORS INCOME PROPERTIES II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           4,117
<DEPRECIATION>                                     752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,359
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       485
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.72<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of the Genesis  Companies Group,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2004, as
filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on March  30,  2005 (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C./ Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: March 29, 2005                        s/Wm. Ernest Simmons
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Wm. Ernest Simmons, Chief Executive
                                             Officer/Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, David Frankel, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor
Corporation.

| |  |                                                                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ David Frankel                                                                                    
| |  |                                                                                                      
| |  | David Frankel                                                                                        
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
 Principal Financial Officer
 Principal Accounting Officer
 November 12, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Daxor Corporation and will be retained by Daxor Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit      21.1**

| WHOLLY-OWNED                SUBSIDIARIES                            | STATE                OF INCORPORATION |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                                |
| Grand                Palais Riverboat, Inc                          | Louisiana                             |
| IOC-Boonville,                Inc.                                  | Nevada                                |
| IOC-Davenport,                Inc.                                  | Iowa                                  |
| IOC                Holdings, L.L.C.                            | Louisiana                             |
| IOC-Kansas                City, Inc.                                | Missouri                              |
| IOC-Lula,                Inc.                                       | Mississippi                           |
| Isle                of Capri Bettendorf, L.C.                  | Iowa                                  |
| Isle                of Capri Marquette, Inc.                        | Delaware                              |
| Louisiana                Riverboat Gaming Partnership               | Louisiana                             |
| Riverboat                Corporation of Mississippi            | Mississippi                           |
| Riverboat                Corporation of Mississippi -Vicksburg | Mississippi                           |
| St.                Charles Gaming Company, Inc.                     | Louisiana                             |
|                                                                |
|                                                                |
| PARTIALLY                OWNED SUBSIDIARIES                         |
|                                                                |
| CCSC/Blackhawk,                Inc.                                 | Colorado                              |
| Isle                of Capri Black Hawk, L.L.C.                     | Colorado                              |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             		 <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  		 12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-26-1998             SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1998             SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                          39,486                  89,495
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,474,117               1,294,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                    56,848                  53,306
<INVENTORY>                                  2,553,384               2,342,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,066,139               3,743,166
<PP&E>                                       4,896,087               4,735,715
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,539,044               1,400,291
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,495,192               7,151,955
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,963,860               1,858,447
<BONDS>                                      1,884,068               1,924,395
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,186,192               1,186,192
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,768,970               1,524,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,495,192               7,151,955
<SALES>                                     14,368,061              12,858,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,430,428              12,992,262
<CGS>                                       10,721,254               9,498,045
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,877,585              12,565,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               412,302                 356,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,400                   3,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             301,817                 301,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                361,511                 180,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                   110,485                  54,889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            361,511                 180,199
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   251,026                 125,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.05                    $.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.04                    $.02
        


</TABLE>
## DICKSTEIN

# sHAP IROLLP 1825 Eye Street NW I Washington, DC 20006-5403 TEL (202) 420-2200 

### I FAx (202) 420-2201 

### I clicksteinshapiro.com May 7, 2015 ViaE-mail kathleen.blankriether@dot.gov Ms. Kathleen Blank Riether Sr. Trial Attorney U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofthe General Counsel Aviation Enforcement Office 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, W98-321 Washington, DC 20590 Re: Jonathan Parker v. Saudi Arabian Airlines, Docket DOT-OST-2015-0093 Tasha Grant v. Saudi Arabian Airlines, Docket DOT-OST-2015-0094 Dear Ms. Blank Riether: We are writing as United States counsel to Saudi Arabian Airlines ("SAA'') with respectto the above-captioned Complaints filed with the U.S. Department ofTransportation ("DOT"). In this regard, we respectfully are asking for an extension until July 2, 2015 for submitting Answers to both Amended Complaints filed onMay 3, 2015 to allowtime to investigate the facts surrounding the allegations inthe Amended Complaints throughthe home office in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Our experience has demonstratedthat communications with the home officetake a substantial amount oftime, and are frequently complicatedby intervening holy days and weeks, which occur at odds withthe U.S. non-business days. Forthese reason we are asking the DOT office ofEnforcement for an extensionto submit appropriate Answers to both Amended Complaints. As always, we will use ourbest efforts to provide Answers priorto the full sixty-day extension.

Los Angeles 

### I New York 

### I Stamford 

### I Washington, DC DSMDB-3336957 vi

### DICKSTEINSHAPI 

### ROLLP Ms. Kathleen Blank Riether May 7, 2015 Page 2 On behalfofSAA, we appreciate your consideration ofour request and look forward to your response. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely,



# \~(J (\ \



# -~

**~** ' \(



### ~ **~·** lJ'A.



### \,~ Henr C. Cashen II (202) 420-2213 direct dial (202) 379-9281 direct fax cashenh@dicksteinshapiro.com HCC/kbb cc: Jeffrey Lovitky via email- lovitky@aol.com

DSMDB-3336957 vi
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7210 

To amend section 1106 of title 31, United States Code, to require the 

President to submit to Congress additional updated economic projections 

before July 16 of each year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2020 

Mr. HARDER of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend section 1106 of title 31, United States Code, 

to require the President to submit to Congress additional 

updated economic projections before July 16 of each 

year. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Budget Transparency 

5 Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7210 IH

1 SEC. 2. SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL UPDATED ECONOMIC 

2 PROJECTIONS. 

3 Section 1106(a)(1) of title 31, United States Code, 

4 is amended by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph 

5 (C), by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (D), 

6 and by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following: 

7 ‘‘(E) updated economic projections, includ8 ing projections for the Federal budget deficit, 

9 unemployment rate, changes to the gross do10 mestic product (GDP), the consumer price 

11 index (CPI), and interest rates, and a justifica12 tion for any differences in such economic pro13 jections of the Office of Management and 

14 Budget and the Congressional Budget Office;’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Equivalent of Birds
Eye Foods, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 24, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2005 (the
"Report"), I, Neil Harrison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

      Date: March 20, 2006             /s/ Neil Harrison
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Chairman of the Board, President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)

                                        5
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed May 15, 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 01751

- CV

UNIVERSITY GENERAL H OSPITAL, L.P., DUFEK MASSIF HOSPITAL CORPORATION A/K/A UN IVERSITY GENERAL HOS PITAL DALLAS, UGHS DALLAS HOSPITALS, IN C., AND HASSAN CHAHA DEH, M.D. , Appellants

V.

REED MIGRAINE CENTER S OF TEXAS, PLLC, DR. KENNETH L. REED, M.D., AND NEURO STIM TECHNOLOG IES, LLC , Appellees

On Appeal from the Co unty Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 13

- 02875

- A



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Evans This is an appeal from a temporary injunction order in favor of appellees. By

unopp osed motion filed May 6, 2014 , appellees inform us the injunction has been dissolved and

move to dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2). We grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal.

131751F.P05 /David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL, L.P., DUFEK MASSIF HOSPITAL CORPORATION A/K/A UNIVERSITY GENERAL HOSPITAL DALLAS, UGHS DALLAS HOSPITALS, INC., AND HASSAN CHAHADEH, M.D., Appellants

No. 05

- 13

- 01751

- CV V.

REED MIGRAINE CENTERS OF TEXAS, PLLC, DR. KENNETH L. REED, M.D., AND NEURO STIM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 13

- 02875

- A. Opinion delivered by Just ice Evans. Justices Fillmore and Evans participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 15th day of May, 2014.

/David W. Eva ns/
DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### DADE COUNTY v. JORDAN MARSH CO.

No. 38474.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Certiorari denied without opinion. 219 So.2d 756.
#### Cora Evelyn SPEARS v. Dalton E. SPEARS.

No. 50615.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 20, 1978.

William P. Dodson, Oxford, for appellant.

Murray L. Williams, Water Valley, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Yalobusha County; Leon E. Hannaford, Chancellor.

Before SMITH, P. J., and WALKER and BOWLING, JJ.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND DECREE HERE REINSTATING PROVISION IN ORIGINAL DECREE AS TO ALIMONY.

PATTERSON, C. J., ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG, BROOM and LEE, JJ., concur.

COFER, J., took no part.
## co C/) lp



## ~2 73
0~ ~



# c a)

- a) om 04 

## E (0 

## E =3 CO V) :5 0 c D I V) -0 a) U) o C) ,t

. i CN 0 C~ (D L) w (o 

### ca (3) (L) 

## cn a)I ~I ', CU co Cl CD - U? I 

## >

~ ~I ~ I 

## < Q' O I O I, I '~ >I, C I N

_ I I L ~ O'O' I N N ~ I I d N I

~ I (O ~ Q U x ~m~I C I~ii ' 1
~ U co :C) 0 o I ~o
~ ~N O ~ I ~ I 

### Q' M I 

### ~n co I L) 

### a ~ m ~ I , I I ~ N IN 

### I I

I O W -O C

: N C I I O c0 4 O I I I i 

# I I~_ O m l 

# ~

N

# .N C

# ~ U 

### a ~ a c 

# (

- m o 00,_ I I N r l , ' .E I l °I - ~ 'n n u I 

### ~

3~ m ~ ~, I ; I '~°'~ ' CD N I

~ i ~ Q Q , _J : '

~ I U) ~ C) I I
,Q~I a) ~ CV ~ ~ . m O U~'I QO ~- ~ ~ I

~ GEIi0 I I ~ O
. m F 0

" a

_ , I p

m ~ I D ' , I ~ ' ~I ' I i , I

- i
I I , i ~ y

y ~ I I I ~ i ~, I I

I~ 1 t
I I i~ Q i I i , I i - lO I 

### O ~ 

## I I I 

## I IQa I I I I i I I I U N N ~I M 75 N S] (ZL LA N Y U

O N Q1 Ifl 

## a

01 O a N 

### m 76 U 4) O
O Z II Z C N V
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7052 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7052

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2141 Ferry Street in Anderson, California, as the ``Norma Comnick 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 28, 2020

 Mr. LaMalfa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2141 Ferry Street in Anderson, California, as the ``Norma Comnick 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NORMA COMNICK POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2141 Ferry Street in Anderson, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Norma Comnick Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Norma 
Comnick Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```