37308 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

Dated: June 11, 2010. 

M.N. Parks, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

Ninth Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2010–15704 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–0521] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; 

Grand River, Grand Haven, MI 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation 

from regulations. 

SUMMARY: Commander, Ninth Coast 

Guard District, issued a temporary 

deviation from the regulation governing 

the operation of the U.S. 31 Bridge at 

Mile 2.89 over the Grand River, at Grand 

Haven, MI. This deviation temporarily 

changes the bridges operating schedule 

to accommodate the City’s Fourth of 

July and Coast Guard Festival events for 

2010. This temporary deviation allows 

the bridges to remain secured to masted 

navigation on the dates and times listed. 

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

10 p.m. on July 4, 2010 to 2 a.m. on July 

5, 2010 and again from 10 p.m. on 

August 7, 2010 to 2 a.m. on August 8, 

2010. 

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in 

this preamble as being available in the 

docket are part of docket USCG–2010– 

0521 and are available online by going 

to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting 

USCG–2010–0521 in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box 

and then clicking ‘‘Search’’. They are 

also available for inspection or copying 

at the Docket Management Facility (M– 

30), U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

e-mail Mr. Lee D. Soule, Bridge 

Management Specialist, Ninth Coast 

Guard District; telephone 216–902– 

6085, e-mail; lee.d.soule@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing the 

docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City 

of Grand Haven, MI, requested a 

temporary deviation from the current 

operating regulations set forth in 33 CFR 

117.633. The purpose of this request is 

to facilitate efficient management of all 

transportation needs and provide timely 

public safety services during these 

special events. The most updated and 

detailed current marine information for 

this event, and all bridge operations, is 

found in the Local Notice to Mariners 

and Broadcast Notice to Mariners issued 

by the Ninth District Commander. In 

accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the 

drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the designated time periods. 

These deviations from the operating 

regulations are authorized under 33 CFR 

117.35. 

Dated: June 11, 2010. 

M.N. Parks, 

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

Ninth Coast Guard District. 

F.M. Midgette, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, 

Ninth Coast Guard District, Acting. 

[FR Doc. 2010–15705 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

39 CFR Part 20 

Cigarettes and Smokeless Tobacco— 

Prohibited in All Outbound and 

Inbound International Mail; Correction 

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The Postal Service published 

in the Federal Register of June 22, 2010, 

a final rule pertaining to the 

international mailing of inbound and 

outbound tobacco cigarettes and 

smokeless tobacco with an incorrect 

effective date. This document corrects 

that effective date. 

DATES: Effective Date: The correct 

effective date is June 29, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick 

Klutts at 813–877–0372. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal 

Service published a final rule in the 

Federal Register on June 22, 2010 (75 

FR 35302), adding a new section 136.4 

to the International Mail Manual 

(IMM®), which is incorporated by 

reference in 39 CFR part 20, that 

provides that cigarettes (including rollyour-own tobacco) and smokeless 

tobacco products are nonmailable when 

sent in outbound or inbound 

international mail. That final rule 

contained an erroneous effective date of 

August 2, 2010. This document corrects 

the effective date to June 29, 2010. 

Dated: June 23, 2010. 

Neva R. Watson, 

Attorney, Legislative. 

[FR Doc. 2010–15811 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0237; FRL–9167–6] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Yolo-Solano Air 

Quality Management District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing approval of 

revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality 

Management District (YSAQMD) 

portion of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions were proposed in the Federal 

Register on April 16, 2010 and concern 

volatile organic compound (VOC), 

oxides of nitrogen (NOx), oxides of 

sulfur (SOx), particulate matter (PM), 

and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions 

from the permanent curtailment of 

burning rice straw. We are approving a 

local rule that regulates these emission 

sources under the Clean Air Act as 

amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective on July 29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number EPA–R09–OAR–2010–0237 for 

this action. The index to the docket is 

available electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 

at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California. While all 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the index, some information may be 

publicly available only at the hard copy 

location (e.g., copyrighted material), and 

some may not be publicly available in 

either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the 

hard copy materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily 

Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–4114, 

wong.lily@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 29, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 37309 

I. Proposed Action 

On April 16, 2010 (75 FR 19923), EPA 

proposed to approve the following rule 

into the California SIP. 

Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted 

YSAQMD .................... 3.21 Rice Straw Emission Reduction Credits ............................................ 12/10/08 03/17/09 

We proposed to approve this rule 

because we determined that it complied 

with the relevant CAA requirements. 

Our proposed action contains more 

information on the rule and our 

evaluation. 

II. Public Comments and EPA 

Responses 

EPA’s proposed action provided a 30- 

day public comment period. During this 

period, we did not receive any 

comments. 

III. EPA Action 

No comments were submitted that 

change our assessment that the 

submitted rule complies with the 

relevant CAA requirements. Therefore, 

as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the 

Act, EPA is fully approving this rule 

into the California SIP. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by State law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

Tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on Tribal governments or preempt 

Tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by August 30, 2010. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: June 14, 2010. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

■ Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220, is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(363)(i)(C) to read 

as follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(363) * * * 

(i) * * * 

(C) Yolo Solano Air Quality 

Management District 

(1) Rule 3.21, ‘‘Rice Straw Emission 

Reduction Credits,’’ adopted on 

December 10, 2008. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2010–15641 Filed 6–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with RULES