alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 243 (Thursday, December 18, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66372-66373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33035]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Findings of Scientific Misconduct

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity 
(ORI) has made a final finding of scientific misconduct in the 
following case:
    S. Ashraf Imam, Ph.D., University of Southern California: Based on 
an investigation report forwarded to the Office of Research Integrity 
(ORI) by the University of Southern California (USC) as well as 
information obtained by ORI during its oversight review, ORI found that 
Dr. Imam, an Associate Professor in the Department of Pathology, USC, 
engaged in scientific misconduct by including plagiarized material in a 
grant application submitted to the National Cancer Institute (NCI), 
National Institutes of Health (NIH).
    Specifically, Dr. Imam's NIH grant application contained extensive 
paraphrasing of the text of another researcher's independent grant 
application to a state agency. Dr. Imam had been given that application 
by a colleague in confidence. The colleague was a reviewer on the state 
grant application and requested that Dr. Imam evaluate it and return 
the application to him.
    The other researcher's application was subsequently funded. Dr. 
Imam paraphrased or copied into his NIH application all of the other 
researcher's specific aims, the background on proposed methods, the 
experimental design and research plan, and most of the references; only 
the preliminary results sections of Dr. Imam's application were 
different.
    Dr. Imam has accepted the ORI finding and has entered into a 
Voluntary Exclusion Agreement with ORI in which he has agreed, for the 
three (3) year period beginning December 8, 1997, to exclude himself 
voluntarily from:
    (1) any contracting or subcontracting with any agency of the United 
States Government and from eligibility for, or involvement in, 
nonprocurement transactions (e.g., grants and cooperative agreements) 
of the United States Government as defined in 45 CFR Part 76 (Debarment 
Regulations); and
    (2) serving in any advisory capacity to the Public Health Service 
(PHS), including but not limited to service on any PHS advisory 
committee, board, and/or peer review committee, or as a consultant.
    No scientific publications were required to be corrected as part of 
this Agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Acting Director, Division of Research 
Investigations, Office of Research

[[Page 66373]]

Integrity, 5515 Security Lane, Suite 700, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 
443-5330.
Chris B. Pascal, J.D.,
Acting Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. 97-33035 Filed 12-17-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-17-P
Exhibit 32



FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2010 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and                                                         
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of A.T. Cross Company.

|Date:  May 14, 2010 | DAVID G. WHALEN        
|------------------- | -----------------------
|                    | David G. Whalen        
|                    | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |                        
|                    |                        
|                    | Kevin F. Mahoney       
|                    | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      442
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,355
<PP&E>                                          37,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              746
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        134
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,376
<SALES>                                          5,265
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,321
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,697
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,697
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the “Report”), I, David Frankel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor Corporation.





/s/ David FrankelDavid FrankelChief Financial OfficerPrincipal Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting OfficerAugust 8, 2011










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Daxor Corporation and will be retained by Daxor Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Marvin Earl HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. U-239.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 17, 1974.

Marvin Earl Harris, in pro. per.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Attv Gen., for appellee.

*263PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Harris v. State, 240 So.2d 218 (1 Fla.App.1970); Harris v. State, Case No. N-252, First District Court of Appeal, Voluntary Dismissal, April 8, 1970; Harris v. State, 239 So.2d 598 (1 Fla.App.1970); and Wainwright v. Stone, 414 U.S. 21, 94 S.Ct. 190, 38 L.Ed.2d 179 (1973).

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
#### GREATER BATON ROUGE AIRPORT DISTRICT et al. v. Mrs. Florence Hobgood HAYS et al.

No. 61442.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 10, 1978.

In re: Mrs. Florence Hobgood Hays, et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of East Baton Rouge. 353 So.2d 357.

Writ denied.

SUMMERS, J., would grant the writ.
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 16 , 2018

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 01097

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G .E. AND S.E., CHILDR EN
On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 11

- 15472


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Brown, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Lang
Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By postcard dated December 5, 2017, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both her
brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file her

brief and extension motion would result in the dismiss al of this appeal without further notice. To
date, appellant has not filed her brief, an extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the
Court regarding the status of her brief.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42 .3(b),(c).

171097F.P05 /Douglas S. Lang/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF G.E. AND S.E., CHILDREN

No. 05

- 17

- 01097

- CV On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 11

- 15472. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices Brown and Whitehill participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 16th day of January, 2018.
OSURE SERV

La 20

Mark Fazlollah
Philadelphia Inquirer
PO Box 8263
Philadelphia, PA 19101

August 22, 2012

Marshall Fields

Assistant Director

Information Disclosure Division

Office of Resource Management

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Disclosure Services (DO) Room 6204 Annex Washington, DC 20220

Dear Mr. Fields:

I request the following records under the provisions of the Freedom of
Information Act:

A copy of the first five pages of each application for licenses to do
business with North Korea,

I limit my request to these calendar years: 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
I would like both approved and unapproved licenses,

I agree to pay fees but please let me know if fees are expected to exceed
$35. As a representative of the news media, I ask that you expedite this request.

Let me thank you I advance for your help in this matter.

Sincerely,
Exhibit
32(b)







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Dataram Corporation, a New Jersey corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended January 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Anthony M. Lougee, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
1350), that to his knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.







|March 20, 2015 | /s/
    Anthony M. Lougee
|-------------- | -------------------------
|               | Anthony M. Lougee        
|               | Chief Accounting Officer 



[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dataram Corporation and will be retained
by Dataram Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY RESEARCH 

CORPORATION, DOMAINE ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL, ASUSTEK 

COMPUTER INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

TPV TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, TOP VICTORY 

INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, TOP VICTORY 

ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TOP VICTORY 

ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO., LTD., TPV 

ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD., TPV 

INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC., ENVISION 

PERIPHERALS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees

AOC INTERNATIONAL,

Defendant

______________________ 

2015-1125, -1126, -1127

______________________ 
 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Florida in No. 9:12-cv-80694-PAS, 

9:12-cv-80697-PAS, 9:12-cv-80701-PAS, Judge Patricia A. 

Seitz. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

GREGORY N. STILLMAN, Hunton & Williams LLP, Norfolk, VA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by OZZIE FARRES, MICHAEL ALFRED O’SHEA, 

Washington, DC. 

JONATHAN HACKER, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees TPV Technology Limited, Top Victory 

International Limited, et al., also represented by MARK A.

SAMUELS, BRIAN BERLINER, VISION WINTER, Los Angeles, 

CA. 

JOSHUA M. MASUR, Turner Boyd LLP, Redwood City, 

CA, for defendants-appellees Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc. Also represented by ZHUANJIA 

GU.

CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, 

Redwood City, CA, for defendants-appellees Acer, Inc., 

Acer America Corporation. Also represented by MICHAEL 

CHAOCHA TING. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 
 3

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
#### De’Wayne German THOMAS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Juanita C. HODGE, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 02-15188.

D.C. No. CV-99-06620-REC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 12, 2002.*

Decided Aug. 19, 2002.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, and denies Thomas’ request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

De’Wayne German Thomas, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Zimmerman v. City of Oakland,*255 F.3d 734, 737 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Thomas’ action without prejudice because *846prisoners must exhaust administrative remedies prior to bringing suit in federal court, even where the sole relief sought is monetary. *See Booth v. Churner,*532 U.S. 731, 741, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).

Thomas’ contention that the district court erred by applying *Booth*retroactively to his case lacks merit. *See Harper v. Va. Dep’t of Taxation,*509 U.S. 86, 96, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993) (“[A] rule of federal law, once announced and applied to the parties to the controversy, must be given full retroactive effect by all courts adjudicating federal law”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### Nelson C. WHITMER, Appellant, v. HORNE-WILSON, INC., a Georgia corporation, Appellee.

No. 69-131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.

Aug. 15, 1969.

E. G. Boone, of Boone & Kanetsky, Venice, for appellant.

Jackson S. Bradford, of Braswell, Brown & Bradford, Venice, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Sroczyk v. Fritz (Fla.1969), 220 So.2d 908.

HOBSON, C. J., and LILES and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67355]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33519]



[[Page 67355]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. RP97-408-003]


Trailblazer Pipeline Company; Notice of Motion To Make Tariff 
Sheets Effective

December 18, 1997.
    Take notice that on December 15, 1997, Trailblazer Pipeline Company 
(Trailblazer) file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission a 
Motion to Make Suspended Tariff Sheets Effective (Motion). Trailblazer 
moved to make effective on January 1, 1998, tariff sheets filed on July 
1, 1997 in this proceeding.
    Trailblazer states that the rates on the tariff sheets to be 
effective January 1, 1998 reflect the effect of removing from 
Trailblazer's rate base facilities which were not in service on 
November 30, 1997, the end of the test period. Trailblazer has also 
filed to make effective January 1, 1998, tariff sheets related to its 
revised treatment of line pack.
    Trailblazer requested waiver of any applicable Commission 
Regulations and orders to the extent necessary to permit the proposed 
tariff sheets to become effective on January 1, 1998.
    Trailblazer states that copies of the Motion, together with the 
tariff sheets and workpapers, are being served on Trailblazer's 
customers, interested state regulatory agencies, and all parties set 
out on the official service list at Docket No. RP97-408.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing should file a protest 
with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Section 385.211 of the 
Commission's Rules and Regulations. All such protests must be filed as 
provided in Section 154.210 of the Commission's Regulations. Protests 
will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate 
action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
the proceeding. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission 
and are available for public inspection in the Public Reference Room.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33519 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          32,015
<SECURITIES>                                     8,335
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    249,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,113
<PP&E>                                         156,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                  78,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 470,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          211,159
<BONDS>                                         30,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,462
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   470,902
<SALES>                                        478,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,930
<CGS>                                          375,956
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  375,956
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               111,201 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,593
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,820) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (965)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,929)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,929)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.33) 
        

</TABLE>
DEBENTURE EXTENSION - Prospect

  
 iWallet Corporation | 7394 Trade Street | San Diego, CA 92196-3418 | (800) 508-5042
  
 July 13, 2021
  
 To: iWallet Debenture Holders
  
 Dear Sir/Madam:
  
 We refer to the secured convertible debentures issued by iWallet Corporation (the “Company”), dated April 30, 2015 and June 30, 2015 (the “Debenture”) issued to the undersigned debentureholder (the “Debentureholder”). The Company is requesting permission to extend the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) until April 30, 2022. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Debenture.
  
 The Company and the Debentureholder hereby amends the Debentures as follows:
  
 1. Each reference to the Maturity Date in the Debenture shall be amended to reflect “April 30, 2022”.
  
 All other terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect unamended and time shall continue to be of the essence.
  
 If you are in agreement with the terms and conditions of this letter, please sign and return to my attention.
  
 Yours truly,
  
 IWALLET CORPORATION
  
 By: /s/ Steve Cabouli
 “Authorized Signing Officer”
  
 The undersigned hereby acknowledges and consents to the above noted amendment, extending the Maturity Date until April 30, 2022.
  
 	 If Debentureholder is a corporation, trust, partnership or other entity:
	  
	 If Debentureholder is an individual:

	  
	  
	  

	 Prospect Pluto Enterprises Ltd.
	  
	  

	 Name of Entity
	  
	 Signature

	  
	  
	  

	 /s/ Mikhail Lefel
	  
	  

	 Signature of Person Signing
	  
	 Name of Individual

	  
	  
	  

	 President
	  
	  

	 Title of Person Signing
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of SemGroup Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Robert N. Fitzgerald, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 30, 2011



/s/ Robert N. FitzgeraldRobert N. FitzgeraldSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Robert Pierce KEY v. STATE.

No. 38455.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 1969.

Habeas corpus denied without opinion.