alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 6753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3665]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

49 CFR Parts 383 and 391

[FHWA Docket No. MC-93-23]
RIN 2125-AD20


Commercial Driver Physical Qualifications as Part of the 
Commercial Driver's License Process

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of meeting of negotiated rulemaking advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA announces the meeting date of an advisory committee 
(the Committee) established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
and the Negotiated Rulemaking Act to consider the relevant issues and 
attempt to reach a consensus in developing regulations governing the 
proposed merger of the State-administered commercial driver's license 
(CDL) procedures of 49 CFR Part 383 and the driver physical 
qualifications requirements of 49 CFR Part 391. The Committee is 
composed of persons who represent the interests that would be 
substantially affected by the rule.
    The FHWA believes that public participation is critical to the 
success of this proceeding. Participation at meetings is not limited to 
Committee members. Negotiation sessions are open to the public, so 
interested parties may observe the negotiations and communicate their 
views in the appropriate time and manner to Committee members.
    For a listing of Committee members, see the notice published on 
July 23, 1996, 61 FR 38133. Please note that the United Motorcoach 
Association and the American Bus Association will serve as full members 
of the Committee. For additional background information on this 
negotiated rulemaking, see the notice published on April 29, 1996, at 
61 FR 18713.

DATES: The sixth meeting of the advisory committee will begin at 9:30 
a.m. on March 24-25, 1997.

ADDRESSES: The sixth meeting of the advisory committee will be held at 
the Department of Transportation, Nassif Building, Room 3200, 400 7th 
Street, SW, Washington, D.C. Subsequent meetings will be held at 
locations to be announced.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Teresa Doggett, Office of Motor 
Carrier Research and Standards, (202) 366-4001, or the Office of Chief 
Counsel, (202) 366-0834, Federal Highway Administration, 400 Seventh 
Street, SW., Washington, D.C. 20590. Office hours are from 7:45 a.m. to 
4:15 p.m. e.t., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

    Authority: [5 U.S.C. 561-570; 5 U.S.C. App. 2 sections 1-15]

    Issued on: February 7, 1997.
George L. Reagle,
Associate Administrator for Motor Carriers.
[FR Doc. 97-3665 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
258 La. 578

#### Leola STUTTS, as Natural Tutrix of Clifford Ray Moss v. James SISTRUNK, and Traders & General Insurance Company.

No. 51353.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1971.

In re: Leola Stutts, as Natural Tutrix for the minor, Clifford Ray Moss applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Sabine. 245 So.2d 721.

Writs denied. No error of law noted.
Exhibit 31.2**Certification**I, Jack F. Callahan, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dean Holding Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of Dean Holding Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for Dean Holding Company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to Dean Holding Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of Dean Holding Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in Dean Holding Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Dean Holding Company’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Dean HoldingCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.5. Dean Holding Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Dean Holding Company’sauditors and the audit committee of Dean Holding Company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectDean Holding Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in Dean Holding Company’s internal control over financialreporting.       /s/ JACK F. CALLAHAN, JR.         Jack F. Callahan, Jr.
#### Paul L. ROUGEUX, Petitioner, v. Hon. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Director Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-1215.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 31, 1973.

Habeas corpus denied.
U.S. flag
          Un sitio oficial del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos
            Así es como usted puede verificarlo
          Así es como usted puede verificarloDot gov**El .gov significa que es oficial.**
                
                Los sitios web del gobierno federal siempre usan un dominio .gov o .mil. Antes de compartir información confidencial en línea, asegúrese de estar en un sitio .gov o .mil.
          Https**Este sitio es seguro.**
                
                El **https://** medios todos los datos transmitidos son cifrados - en otras palabras, cualquier información o el historial de navegación que proporcione se transmite de forma segura.

    
          FTC: Translation Menu
  

        
EnglishFTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas **
Menú


    close


                  FTC: Main navigation (ES)
  

        
  
  Consejos para consumidores
      
    Guía para negocios
      
    Reembolsos
      
    Noticias
      
    Acerca de la FTC
      
    Buscar
        
        
        FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        
    
    Reporte las estafas
                                
                          
        
                Reciba alertas

          
  
          Consejos para consumidores
      
    
              Guía para negocios
      
    
              Reembolsos
      
    
              Noticias
      
    
              Acerca de la FTC
      
    
              Buscar Sobrescribir enlaces de ayuda a la navegación
      Inicio
                                                                        Guía para negociosView this page in English

  
      Guía del Comprador Section Submenu
  Consejos para consumidores
              
        Guía para negocios
              
        Reembolsos
              
        Noticias
              
        Acerca de la FTC
              
        BuscarFile
        View PDF
  (120.22 KB)


La Ley de Automóviles Usados de la Comisión Federal de Comercio requiere a los concesionarios a fijar una Guía del Comprador en cada automóvil usado que esté a la venta.


Nov 2016
  
    
    
    

  Return to top **
Menú
FTC: Secondary Menu (ES)
  

        


      Reporte las estafas
                              Reciba alertas
  
  
      FTC: Footer (es)
  

        


      Política de privacidad y noticias
Ex 10e16 2013 10-K






EXHIBIT 10(e)16


BASE SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY


The following are the annual base salaries, effective March 1, 2014, of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Mississippi Power Company and certain other executive officers of Mississippi Power Company who served during 2013.




	
		
	G. Edison Holland, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$665,176

	Edward Day, VI*
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$418,454

	Moses Feagin
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
	$252,668

	Thomas O. Anderson**
Vice President
	$199,906

	John W. Atherton
Vice President
	$258,975

	Jeff G. Franklin
Vice President
	$256,531






* Retired May 20, 2013
** Retired May 31, 2013
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130337-8 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 130337-8 

 COA: 257139; 257140 

Wayne CC: 04-005548-01; 

04-001585-01 

TERENCE DARRYL GRAY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
#### M. Heywood WARRICK, an Individual, Appellant, v. Charles K. CHEEZEM et al., Appellees.

No. 72-642.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

Appeal dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Nygee T., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[721 NYS2d 528]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J.), entered on or about June 5, 2000, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and menacing in the second degree, and placed him on probation, under the Juvenile Intensive Supervision Program, for a period of 12 months, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of *193vacating the finding as to menacing in the second degree, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the court’s determination to credit the inculpatory portion of the complainant’s testimony (see, *People v Rivera,*68 NY2d 786; *Matter of Isaac Q.,*217 AD2d 410).

As the Presentment Agency commendably concedes, the petition was jurisdictionally defective with respect to the menacing charge (see, *Matter of Francisco C.,*238 AD2d 224). Concur— Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
EX-10.149 12.31.2013




Exhibit 10.149




SECOND AMENDMENT TO


ERIE INSURANCE GROUP
EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLAN


(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2010)


WHEREAS, Erie Indemnity Company (the “Company”) maintains the Erie Insurance Group Retirement Plan for Employees, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2010 (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Company has delegated to the Employee Benefits Administration Committee (“EBAC”), through its Charter, the authority to make certain amendments to the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Company has previously amended the Plan by an Amendment dated December 27, 2013.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby further amends the Plan as follows:


1.    Section 1.33 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety and shall now read as follows:


“1.33    “Spouse” shall mean, with respect to any Participant, the person to whom the Participant is married at a given determination date, as determined under applicable law.”


		
	2.
	In all other respects, the Company ratifies and confirms the Erie Insurance Group Employee Savings Plan as Amended and Restated effective January 1, 2010, which together with this Amendment No. 2 constitutes the entire Plan.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Plan Amendment to be executed this 27th day of December, 2013.


ATTEST:        ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


 

/s/ Sheila M. Hirsch                    By: /s/ Sean J. McLaughlin                    
Sean J. McLaughlin        
Title:    EVP, Secretary and General Counsel


		
	ATTEST:
	EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE




 

/s/ Karen A. Skarupski                    By: /s/ William D. Gheres                    
William Gheres
Title:    Chair, Employee Benefits
Administration Committee
#### Fred J. WICKHAM, Petitioner, v. GRAY OFFICE MACHINE SERVICE, Security Insurance Group, and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 38268.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 7, 1969.

Rehearing Denied June 10, 1969.

Allen Clements and Charles F. Lindsay, Miami, for petitioner.

Cornell & Lanza,- Miami, Patrick H. Mears and J. Franklin Garner, Tallahassee, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 9, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees is also denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67921-67922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following six meetings:

    Name and Committee Code: Special Emphasis Panel in Materials 
Research #1203

[[Page 67922]]

    Date, Time & Room:

January 14, 1998; 8:30 am-5:00 pm; NSF Conference Room 380
January 19, 1998; 8:30 am-5:00 pm; NSF Conference Room 390
January 20, 1998; 8:30 am-5:00 pm; NSF Conference Room 390
January 21, 1998; 8:30 am-5:00 pm; NSF Conference Room 390
January 22, 1998; 8:30 am-5:00 pm; NSF Conference Room 320
January 23, 1998; 8:30 am-5:00 pm; NSF Conference Room 320

    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Closed
    Contact Person: Dr. Lorretta J. Inglehart, Program Director, 
National Facilities and Instrumentation, Division of Materials 
Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: (703) 306-1817.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate the 1998 Proposals for 
Instrumentation in Materials Research (IMR) as part of the selection 
process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c) (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: December 22, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-33899 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2555-01-M
EXHIBIT 11

                  SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

                Schedule of Computation of Net Earnings Per Share
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                    Year Ended December 31,
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                  1999        1998        1997
                                                 -------     -------     -------
Net earnings                                     $66,831     $55,511     $41,644
                                                 =======     =======     =======
Weighted average shares:
     Common shares outstanding                    64,079      64,005      63,363

     Common equivalent shares issuable
     upon exercise of employee stock
     options                                       1,211       1,245       1,413
                                                 -------     -------     -------
Diluted weighted average shares                   65,290      65,250      64,776
                                                 =======     =======     =======

Basic earnings per share                         $  1.04     $   .87     $   .66
                                                 =======     =======     =======

Diluted earnings per share                       $  1.02     $   .85     $   .64
                                                 =======     =======     =======
Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
						
                      CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
						
						
                                                  Years ended December 31,
                                                  1998             1997


Net sales                                   $ 15,853,002      $ 15,023,762

Cost of sales                                  4,595,582         4,192,743
                                             ------------      ------------
                                              11,257,420        10,831,019
                                             ------------      ------------

Selling, general and administrative
  expenses                                     8,961,198         8,084,668
Depreciation and amortization                  1,104,753         1,488,794
Interest expense-net                             200,180           297,709
Other income                                     (47,684)           (5,058)
                                             ------------      ------------
                                              10,218,447         9,866,113
                                             ------------      ------------
   Income before income taxes                  1,038,973           964,906
  
Income tax expense                               120,000            58,500
                                             ------------      ------------
   NET INCOME                               $    918,973      $    906,406
                                             ============      ============

Net income per common share
         Basic                              $       0.11      $       0.11
                                             ============      ============
         Diluted                            $       0.10      $       0.11
                                             ============      ============

Weighted average number
  of common shares
    Basic                                      8,410,000         8,200,000
                                             ============      ============
    Diluted                                    8,950,000         8,460,000
                                             ============      ============






The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.


                             F-5
#### Albert P. ROGERS, personally, and d/b/a Albert P. Rogers, Inc., Appellant, v. Derek Browning PARKER, Appellee.

No. 70-249.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 2, 1970.

McMullen, Everett & Logan, Clearwater, for appellant.

Nixon & Farnell, Clearwater, for ap-pellee.

LILES, Acting Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Parker, appellee here, came to Clearwater from Miami for the purpose of attending a flight training school. Parker rented an apartment from appellant Rogers on a six-month lease. After living in the apartment for a while, Parker returned to Miami for the Christmas holidays.

The rental payment on the apartment in question did not arrive on the due date, January 5, 1969. Appellant inspected the apartment and determined that appellee had abandoned the premises. The apartment was then cleaned and re-rented, and Parker’s belongings were put in a garage. Parker’s rent check arrived in Rogers’ office on January 8, 1969, the same day that Parker returned to find someone else living in his apartment. Parker brought suit against Rogers in the Circuit Court of Pinellas County, alleging that he was wrongfully evicted, and that certain valuable articles missing from the apartment had been converted by Rogers. The circuit court granted summary judgment in favor of Parker on the issue of wrongful eviction.

Appellant Rogers appeals from this summary judgment and contends that a jury should determine whether or not Parker *429was wrongfully evicted. We find the appellant’s contention to be correct.

Rule 1.510(c), FRCP, 31 F.S.A., allows summary judgment when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Florida courts have held that even if there is no contradiction in the evidence, a summary judgment is not proper if the facts in evidence are reasonably susceptible of conflicting inferences. Pan American Distributing Co. v. Sav-A-Stop, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 753; Touart v. Gonzalez, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 656.

The inferences to be drawn from the evidence in this case could reasonably lead to different conclusions. It is for the jury to decide if appellee was wrongfully evicted or if appellant correctly assumed that the apartment had been abandoned.

Accordingly, the order granting summary judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for further action consistent with this opinion.

PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.