alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7112 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7112

    To amend title 37, United States Code, and the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 to enhance financial assistance 
             to military spouses for professional expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2020

 Mr. Sablan (for himself and Mr. Banks) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 37, United States Code, and the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 to enhance financial assistance 
             to military spouses for professional expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Spouse Career Education 
Act''.

SECTION 2. EXPANSION OF REIMBURSABLE STATE LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION 
              COSTS FOR A MILITARY SPOUSE ARISING FROM RELOCATION.

    Section 476(p)(5) of title 37, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``and'' and inserting ``fees, continuing education courses, 
        and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``secure'' and 
        inserting ``secure or maintain''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``secure'' and 
        inserting ``secure or maintain''.

SECTION 3. EXPANSION OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE UNDER MY CAREER 
              ADVANCEMENT ACCOUNT PROGRAM.

    Section 580F of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2020 (Public Law 116-92) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) Professional License or 
        Certification; Associate's Degree.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary'';
            (2) by inserting ``or maintenance (including continuing 
        education courses)'' after ``pursuit''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) National Testing.--Financial assistance under subsection (a) 
may be applied to the costs of national tests that may earn a 
participating military spouse course credits required for a degree 
approved under the program (including the College Level Examination 
Program tests and the Subject Standardized Tests of the Defense 
Activity for Non-Traditional Education Support Division of the 
Department of Defense).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2300 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2300

    To terminate certain executive actions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2021

 Mr. Cawthorn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Oversight and Reform, and in addition to the Committees on 
the Judiciary, Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, and Homeland Security, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To terminate certain executive actions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF CERTAIN EXECUTIVE ACTIONS.

    (a) Termination.--The following shall be void beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this Act:
            (1) Executive Orders 13986 and 13993.
            (2) Presidential Proclamation 10142.
    (b) Effect.--All actions taken pursuant to any proclamation or 
Executive order terminated under subsection (a) shall cease on the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 09213

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3Description

x 09213\09213_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09213\09213_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 09213\09213_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09213\09213_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09213\09213_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09213\09213_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 09213\09213_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

09213\Certification Statement Plant ID 09213.pdf Plant certification statement

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-1.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-2.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-3.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-4.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-5.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-6.JPG Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-7.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-8.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_D-9.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_Map 1.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09213\Supporting Documentation\09213_Map 2.bmp Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
     In connection with the Form 10-Q of DeanHolding Company (the “Company”) for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Gregg L. Engles, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ GREGG L. ENGLES      Gregg L. Engles     *Chief Executive Officer*
Date: May 14, 2004
Note: This certification accompanies the Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not be deemed filed, except to the extent required bythe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7202 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to issue long-term leases on Federal 

lands under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to companies that relocate production facilities from the People’s 

Republic of China to the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2020 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. GOHMERT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to issue long-term 

leases on Federal lands under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management to companies 

that relocate production facilities from the People’s Republic of China to the United States, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LONG-TERM LEASES FOR RELOCATION OF PRO4 DUCTION FACILITIES FROM THE PEOPLE’S 

5 REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

6 (a) LEASES AUTHORIZED.— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7202 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Inte2 rior shall issue long-term leases on Federal lands 

3 under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau 

4 of Land Management and deemed suitable for this 

5 purpose to companies that relocate production facili6 ties from the People’s Republic of China to the 

7 United States. 

8 (2) CERTIFICATION REQUIRED.—The Secretary 

9 of the Interior may only enter into a lease under this 

10 section after the Secretary of Commerce has cer11 tified that the production facility to be located on 

12 the leased land will replace a production facility of 

13 the same size and type located in the People’s Re14 public of China. 

15 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF LEASES.— 

16 (1) TERM OF LEASE.—Leases under this sec17 tion shall be for a term of 99 years. If the produc18 tion facility relocated as a condition of a lease under 

19 this section is relocated out of the United States be20 fore the expiration of the 99-year lease term, the 

21 Secretary of Commerce may issue a fine to the leas22 ing company of an amount determined by that Sec23 retary. 

24 (2) FEE.—The rental fee for leases under this 

25 section shall be $1 per acre per year. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7202 IH

1 (3) USE OF LAND.—Land subject to a lease 

2 under this section may be used only for a production 

3 facility relocated from the People’s Republic of 

4 China. Such companies may construct facilities on 

5 such the land subject to the lease for the purposes 

6 of such production, in accordance with State and 

7 Federal law. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Florida ex rel. John HARGROVE, Relator, v. Richard KELLY, Judge, etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 73-1008.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 4, 1973.

Quo Warranto denied.
#### Robert T. HELD, Appellant, v. Carmen MORO, Executor of the Estate of Gerald Scott Moro, Appellee.

No. 72-994.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 10, 1973.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 17, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 30 (Thursday, February 13, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6835-6836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3595]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
[AC-2; OTS No. 4229]


Guaranty Savings and Homestead Association, Metairie, Louisiana; 
Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 7, 1997, the Director, 
Corporate Activities, Office of Thrift Supervision, or her designee, 
acting pursuant to delegated authority, approved the application of 
Guaranty

[[Page 6836]]

Savings and Homestead Association, Metairie, Louisiana, to convert to 
the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available 
for inspection at the Dissemination Branch, Office of Thrift 
Supervision, 1700 G Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20552, and the 
Midwest Regional Office, Office of Thrift Supervision, 122 W. John 
Carpenter Freeway, Suite 600, Irving, Texas 75039-2010.

    Dated: February 10, 1997.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Nadine Y. Washington,
Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-3595 Filed 2-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Electronic Docket Index for

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0460]

Revisions to Implementation Plans, 

State of California, Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District 

New Source Review

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. SIP Submittal Documents

 SIP submittal letter from CARB, Rule 214, dated December 7, 2010 I-A

 SIP submittal letter from CARB, Rule 203, dated January 28, 2011 I-B

 Rule 214 adopted October 28, 2010 – Clean Copy I-C

 Rule 203 adopted on January 27, 2011– Clean Copy I-D

 SMAQMD, Final Staff Report, Rules 214, August 18, 2010 I-E

 SMAQMD, Final Staff Report, Rules 203, December 22, 2010 I-F

II. Federal Register Notices

 50 FR 25417 (June19,1985) Final SIP approval of Rule 202 II-A

 75 FR 24409 (May 5, 2010) EPA’s reclassification of the Sacramento Metro Air Basin II-B

 75 FR 77698 (December 13, 2010) EPA Greenhouse Gas SIP Call II-C

III. Other Relevant Documents

 Submittal Completeness Letter for Rule 214, dated January 13, 2011 III-A

 Submittal Completeness Letter for Rule 203, dated May 12, 2011 III-B

 Technical Support Document for SMAQMD Rules 214 & 203, dated May 6, 2011 III-C

 SMAQMD Rule 202 (New Source Review), adopted November 20, 1984 III-D

 SMAQMD Rule 201 (General Permit Requirements), adopted November 20, 1984 III-E

 SMAQMD Rule 203, Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD), State 

Implementation Plan Equivalency Determination, January 28, 2011

III-F

IV. EPA Rulemaking Documents

 Federal Register Notice of Proposed Rulemaking dated May 19, 2011 (76 FR 28942) IV-A

Notes:

1. A copy of each document is located at the EPA Region 9 office.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
Feldschuh, Vice President of Operations and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: April 15, 2005                    /s/ Stephen Feldschuh
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Stephen Feldschuh
                                        Vice President of Operations and Chief
                                        Financial Officer


                                        9
**Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of CrownCrafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending October 1, 2006 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: November 15, 2006              /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board,   President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,467
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                       415
<INVENTORY>                                     38,747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,526
<PP&E>                                          85,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,736
<BONDS>                                         63,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,520
<SALES>                                         62,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,583
<CGS>                                           45,727
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,727
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,913
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
Order entered December 4, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00790-CR

JEREMY WAYNE MILLS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-72093-U

ORDER

Appellant, who was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child 

younger than fourteen years of age, filed his brief on November 30, 2020. In the 

brief, appellant identifies the victim by initials; however, he identifies other 

children by name. This Court does not allow a party to file a brief that discloses the 

names of victims or the names of witnesses who were children at the time of the 

offenses, or the names of any other children discussed or identified at trial. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(b) (“Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper 
–2–

filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain 

sensitive data.”), id. 9.10(a)(3) (“Sensitive Data Defined. Sensitive data consists of 

. . . a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at 

the time the offense was committed.”). Accordingly, we STRIKE appellant’s 

brief.

We ORDER appellant to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, 

an amended brief that identifies any individuals who were children at the time of 

this offense either generically (for example, “victim”) or by initials only, including 

when quoting relevant portions of the record, giving a statement of the case, or 

attaching an appendix.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable 

Stephanie Huff, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; Bruce Kaye; and 

the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00155

- CV

TEXAS DEP ARTMEN T OF CRIMINAL JUSTIC E

, Appellant

v.

TROY THOELE

, Appellee

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1828674

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

Appellee has filed a pro se “Notice of Dismissal and Motion for Abeyance.” The parties

explain that this interlocutory appeal is moot because the underlying case has b een

dismissed in its entirety.

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from s eeking relief to which it

would otherwise be entitled. See id. Appellant’s motion to dismiss is therefore granted

.

Appellee’s motion for abeyance is denied. This appeal is dismissed.Tex. Dep’t of Crim. Just. v. Thoele Page 2 REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

A ppeal dismissed

Opini on delivered and filed July 18, 2018

[CV06]
#### Joe C. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-907.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 26, 1973.

*237James A. Gardner, Public Defender, and Elliott C. Metcalfe, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, Bradenton, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

GRIMES, Judge.

The appellant pled guilty to aggravated assault and was placed on four years’ probation, conditioned on his spending one year in jail. Thereafter, he was charged with violating his probation. At his revocation hearing, at which he was represented by counsel, he pled guilty to a charge of violating his probation by reason of having left the jail without permission. Thereupon, the court revoked his probation and sentenced him to three years in prison.

Appellant contends that the trial court failed to make an affirmative determination that his plea of guilty to the charge of violating his probation was freely and voluntarily given. The appellant maintains that the strict requirements of guilty pleas in original criminal proceedings which were established in Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed. 2d 274, must be carried over to a proceeding involving the revocation of probation. We disagree.

Section 948.06, Florida Statutes, F. S.A., states that at a hearing on revocation of probation, the court shall advise the probationer of the charge of violation. The statute further provides that if such charge is admitted, the court may revoke the probation. While appellant was advised of the charge of violation and admitted that he understood that a guilty plea would open up his original sentence for reconsideration, there was no affirmative inquiry into whether the plea was voluntarily and freely given. Hence, the record might not stand the scrutiny of *Boykin*had this been a plea to an original criminal charge, but we do not need to decide that question. A hearing for the revocation of probation need not meet the strict requirements of a criminal trial. It is enough that a hearing be held in which evidence is taken and in which the probationer has a reasonable opportunity to present his position. McNeely v. State, Fla.App.1966, 186 So.2d 520.

Here, appellant was represented by counsel, and the record reflects that he knew what he was doing when he made his plea. There was no contention that the plea was not freely and voluntarily given. While such a contention was said to be irrelevant in *Boykin,*we have concluded that the requirements of *Boykin*need not be fulfilled to the letter in a hearing on revocation of the privilege of probation.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and BOARDMAN, J., concur.