alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.37



 Exhibit 10.37 

Corrections Corporation of America (the “Company”) 

Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation 

I. Director Compensation. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for serving as directors of the Company.
The following table sets forth current rates of cash compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors. 
 Retainers and Fees

  

					
	 Board retainer
	  	$	53,500	  
	 Board meeting fee
	  	$	3,250	  
	 Audit chair retainer
	  	$	12,200	  
	 Audit member retainer
	  	$	2,200	  
	 Compensation, Nominating and Governance chair retainer
	  	$	5,350	  
	 Committee chair meeting fee (excluding Executive)
	  	$	2,700	  
	 Non-chair committee meeting fee
	  	$	2,200	  

 In addition to the cash compensation set forth above, each non-employee director has historically received a
grant of stock-based compensation in the form of a non-qualified option for the purchase of shares of the Company’s common stock and shares of restricted stock of the Company. During 2013 each director was awarded restricted stock units that
vested on the anniversary of the award. 
 II. Executive Officer Compensation. The following table sets forth the current base salaries and the
fiscal 2013 performance bonuses provided to the individuals who are anticipated to constitute the named executive officers of the Company for 2014. 
  

									
	 Executive Officer
	  	Current Salary	 	  	Fiscal 2013
Bonus Amount	 
	 Damon T. Hininger
	  	$	785,000	  	  	$	344,066	  
	 Todd J Mullenger
	  	$	380,000	  	  	$	165,908	  
	 Harley G. Lappin III
	  	$	355,000	  	  	$	155,258	  
	 Anthony L. Grande
	  	$	355,000	  	  	$	155,258	  
	 Steven E. Groom
	  	$	298,000	  	  	$	131,758	  

 The named executive officers will also participate in the Company’s 2014 Cash Bonus Plan and will
continue to receive long-term incentive awards pursuant to the Company’s stockholder approved equity incentive plans. 
 III. Additional
Information. The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding director and named executive officer compensation will be provided in the Company’s proxy statement to be filed in connection with the 2014 annual
meeting of stockholders.
<PAGE>
<PAGE> 22
                                                                  Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
                    AMERICAN GENERAL FINANCE CORPORATION
              Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (Unaudited)


<CAPTION>
                                                         Nine Months Ended
                                                           September 30,
                                                        1999          1998
                                                      (dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                   <C>           <C>
Earnings:
  Income before provision for income
    taxes                                             $266,428      $226,137
  Interest expense                                     412,834       368,883
  Implicit interest in rents                            11,604         8,543

Total earnings                                        $690,866      $603,563


Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                    $412,834      $368,883
  Implicit interest in rents                            11,604         8,543

Total fixed charges                                   $424,438      $377,426


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        1.63          1.60
</TABLE>
#### Virginia Lightfoot POWELL, Appellant, v. George Mathews POWELL, IV, Appellee.

No. EE-227.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 18, 1977.

Hugh T. Handley, Fort Walton Beach, for appellant.

Gregory M. Anchors of Moore & Anchors, Niceville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, we affirm the final judgment of dissolution. Appellant’s motion for injunctive relief is granted and appellee is enjoined from taking the three minor children whom he was granted custody from the jurisdiction of the State of Florida until this opinion has become final.

McCORD, C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Amy Vidrine Samson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006 ofCrown Crafts, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: November 15, 2006                                                                   /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson   Amy Vidrine Samson   Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33605]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration
[A-351-817]


Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Brazil: Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review: Extension of Time Limit

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time limit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is extending the 
time limit of the final results of the antidumping duty administrative 
review of Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Brazil. This 
review covers the period August 1, 1995 through July 31, 1996.

EFFECTIVE DATE: December 24, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samantha Denenberg or Linda Ludwig, 
Office of AD/CVD Enforcement, Group III, Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C.; telephone (202) 
482-0414 or 482-3833, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to the complexity of issues involved in 
this case, it is not practicable to complete this review within the 
original time limit. The Department is extending the time limit for 
completion of the final results until March 8, 1998, in accordance with 
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Trade and Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by 
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act of 1994. See memorandum to Robert S. 
LaRussa from Joseph A. Spetrini regarding the extension of the case 
deadline, dated December 16, 1997.
    This extension is in accordance with 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(3)(A)).

    Dated: December 16, 1997.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Enforcement Group III.
[FR Doc. 97-33605 Filed 12-23-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7006 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7006

 To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to waive the application 
 of certain conditions of payment and conditions of participation for 
home health services furnished in an emergency area during an emergency 
                    period, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2020

Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Ms. Sewell of Alabama, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. 
    Nadler, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Serrano, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
   Espaillat, and Ms. Meng) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to waive the application 
 of certain conditions of payment and conditions of participation for 
home health services furnished in an emergency area during an emergency 
                    period, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Care in Home Health 
Agencies Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE APPLICATION OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF 
              PAYMENT AND CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION FOR HOME HEALTH 
              SERVICES FURNISHED IN AN EMERGENCY AREA DURING AN 
              EMERGENCY PERIOD.

    Section 1135(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-5) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (7), by striking at the end ``and'';
            (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by inserting the following new paragraph:
            ``(9) in the case of a home health service (as defined in 
        section 1861(m)) and the home health agency documents the 
        receipt of verbal orders issued by the physician, nurse 
        practitioner, physician assistant, or clinical nurse 
        specialist, as appropriate, with respect to such home health 
        service, conditions of payment or conditions of participation 
        that would otherwise require written--
                    ``(A) signed and dated plan of treatment;
                    ``(B) orders for care;
                    ``(C) certification of benefit eligibility; or
                    ``(D) documentation of a face-to-face encounter.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7009 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make a technical correction 

to clarify that colleges and universities located outside the United States 

may participate in the Yellow Ribbon Program of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2020 

Ms. WEXTON (for herself and Mr. BANKS) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to make a technical 

correction to clarify that colleges and universities located 

outside the United States may participate in the Yellow 

Ribbon Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yellow Ribbon for 

5 Overseas Education Act of 2020’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7009 IH

1 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO CLARIFY ELIGIBILITY 

2 FOR PARTICIPATION IN YELLOW RIBBON 

3 PROGRAM OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

4 AFFAIRS. 

5 Section 3317(a) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘the full cost of established 

8 charges (as specified in section 3313)’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘the full cost of tuition and fees for a program of 

10 education’’; and 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘those established charges’’ and 

12 inserting ‘‘such tuition and fees’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Joseph E. Justice, certify that:
     1.     Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ML Life InsuranceCompany of New York;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.     Dated: March 16 2007      /s/ JOSEPH E. JUSTICE
#### In re Forfeiture of the Following Described Property, 1965 CHEVROLET, 4-DOOR bearing 1968-69 FLORIDA LICENSE TAG 60W170, SERIAL NO. 156695A160809, and valued at $815.00.

No. 69-915.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 18, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.
### •

MOLLY F4 CIS JUSTICE 

### 9 

### 04s Order entered October 24, 2012

In The 

## Court of Ztppeato fifth Misaritt of Mexasi at Medias

No. 05-12-00443-CV CLINT SIMON D/B/A SHERLOCK PEST, ET AL., Appellants V. TUDOR INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-13433



### ORDER The Court has before it appellants' October 19, 2012 motion to extend time to file brief and appendix. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the amended brief tendered by appellants on October 19, 2012 be timely filed as of today's date.
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
                Schedule of Computation of Net Earnings Per Share
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    Year Ended December 31
                                                                                    ----------------------
                                                                             1996               1995              1994
                                                                             ----               ----              ----
<S>                                                                        <C>                <C>               <C>
Net Earnings                                                               $27,422            $23,040           $22,629
                                                                            ======             ======            ======

Weighted average shares:
         Common shares outstanding                                          24,956             24,578            24,480
         Common equivalent shares issuable upon exercise
         of employee stock options (1)
                                                                               713                770               845
                                                                            ------             ------            ------
                  Total weighted average shares - primary                   25,669             25,348            25,325

Incremental common equivalent shares (calculated using
the higher of period or average fair market values) (2)                         47                --                 59
                                                                            ------             ------            ------

                  Total weighted average shares - fully
                  diluted                                                   25,716             25,348            25,384
                                                                            ======             ======            ======

Primary net earnings per common and equivalent share                       $  1.07            $   .91           $   .89
                                                                           ========           ========          ========

Fully diluted net earnings per common and equivalent
share (2)                                                                  $   1.07           $    .91          $    .89
                                                                           ========           ========          ========
</TABLE>

--------------------

Notes:

(1)      Amount  calculated  using the  treasury  stock  method and fair  market
         values.

(2)      The  calculation  is submitted in accordance  with  regulation S-K Item
         601(b)(11)  although  not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB
         Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
#### Bess BERNARD t/a Bess Bernard Interiors, Appellant, v. CERASINI MARBLE COMPANY, a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 71-702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 29, 1972.

Appeal from Court of Record, Broward County; Russell E. Seay, Jr., Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
#### SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. Elizabeth T. SHAPIRO and Bernard S. Shapiro, her husband, Appellees.

No. 71-578.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 13, 1973.

Ronald D. McCall, of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey, Kinney & Boggs, Tampa, for appellant.

Alan R. Schwartz, of Horton, Schwartz & Perse and Beckham & McAliley, Miami, for appellees.

HOBSON, Judge.

Appellant brings this appeal from a final judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the appellees.

Appellant has filed thirty-five assignments of error and has argued assignments of error under seven different points. We have carefully considered every point raised by appellant in this appeal and based on the record-on-appeal find each and every point raised to be without merit.

An examination of the record-on-appeal shows that the able and experienced trial *56judge conducted a trial which in all respects was completely fair to both sides. The issues of negligence and contributory negligence were properly submitted to the jury and the eminent trial judge correctly ruled on all matters of law presented to him.

Finding no reversible error, the final judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

MANN, C. J., and PIERCE, J., (Ret.), concur.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Kenneth E. Wolf, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Phoenix Footwear
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge the foregoing Quarterly Report of the Company:

(1) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d), and, (2) the
information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2003             /s/ Kenneth E. Wolf
                                -------------------------------------
                                 Kenneth E. Wolf

                                Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### John Earl MILLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. M-219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 19, 1970.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Robert LANDERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-552.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.