alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Western Massachusetts Electric Company (the registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Leon J. Olivier, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, and David R. McHale, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.    /s/Leon J. OlivierLeon J. OlivierChief Executive Officer   /s/David R. McHaleDavid R. McHaleSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    Date:  August 6, 2008    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

 

FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
#### Brenda WILSON, by and through her mother, and next friend, Minnie Thomas, and Minnie Thomas, Individually, Appellants, v. DADE COUNTY BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, as a governmental agency of the State of Florida, Appellee.

No. 72-718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 24, 1973.

Ser & Keyfetz and Melvin A. Rubin, Miami, for appellants.

Frank A. Howard, Jr., and Phyllis O. Douglas, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends that by the enactment of Fla.Stat. § 230.23, F.S.A., the Legislature has abolished the sovereign immunity *180of school boards in all cases involving- injury to persons lawfully on school property. Such an interpretation of the statute is strained and not in accordance with the legislative purpose. See Howarth v. City of De Land, 117 Fla 692, 158 So. 294 (1934); Peninsular Industrial Ins. Co. v. State, 61 Fla. 376, 55 So. 398 (1911).

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 28 (Tuesday, February 11, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 6248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-3354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY

[FEMA-864-DR]


Hawaii; Amendment to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the 
State of Hawaii (FEMA-864-DR), dated May 18, 1990, and related 
determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: January 27, 1997.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Response and Recovery 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, 
(202) 646-3260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective January 31, 1997.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 83.516, Disaster 
Assistance)
Lacy E. Suiter,
Executive Associate Director, Response and Recovery Directorate.
[FR Doc. 97-3354 Filed 2-10-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-DR-P
No. 00-7480.

#### Fazzini *v.*Adams, Warden, et al.

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *informa pauperis*denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>        MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>       3-MOS

       
<CAPTION>

                                                               EXHIBIT 27 (b)
          
          
     Crown Central Petroleum Corporation and Subsidiaries
             Financial Data Schedule - as revised
           (In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                         
                                         Three Months Ended
                                          March 31, 1998
                                         -----------------
                                         -
    <S>                                  <C>
    <CASH>                                  $     (2    )
    <SECURITIES>                              30,342
    <RECEIVABLES>                             73,956
    <ALLOWANCES>                                (729    )
    <INVENTORY>                              138,937
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                         253,892
    <PP&E>                                   644,727
    <DEPRECIATION>                           345,802
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                           596,451
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    194,276
    <BONDS>                                  129,188
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
    <PREFERRED>                                    0
    <COMMON>                                  49,920
    <OTHER-SE>                               144,254
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             596,451
    <SALES>                                  327,639
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                         327,639
    <CGS>                                    314,495
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                            314,495
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                          33,324
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                              75
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,530
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                          (22,192    )
    <INCOME-TAX>                              (8,449    )
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (13,743    )
    <DISCONTINUED>                                 0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
    <CHANGES>                                      0
    <NET-INCOME>                             (13,743    )
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                              (1.40    )
    <EPS-DILUTED>                              (1.40    )
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


      1.   Swift Transportation Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

      2.   Swift Leasing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

      3.   Common Market Distributing Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

      4.   Sparks Finance Co., Inc., a Nevada corporation

      5.   Cooper Motor Lines, Inc., a South Carolina corporation

      6.   Common Market Equipment Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

      7.   Swift Transportation Co. of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation

      8.   Swift of Texas Co., Inc., a Texas corporation

      9.   Swift Logistics Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation

      10.  Swift Transportation Corporation, a Nevada corporation

      11.  Swift Receivables Corporation, a Delaware corporation

      12.  Sun Merger, Inc., a Tennessee corporation
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 20 - 002 6 3 - CV TIMOTHY CASTLEMAN AND CASTLEMAN CONSULTING , LLC , APPELLANTS V. INTERNET MONEY LIMITED D/B/A THE OFFLINE ASSIST ANT AND KEVIN O ’ CONNOR , INDIVIDUALLY , APPELLEES

No. 07 - 20 - 00264 - CV IN RE TIMOTHY CASTLEMAN AND CASTLEMAN CONSULTING , LLC , RELATOR S 

### November 23 , 2020 ORDER Before QUINN , C.J. , PARKER , and DOSS , JJ. Internet Money Limited d/b/a The Offline Assist ant and Kevin O ’ Connor (Offline) moved to dismiss the above - numbered consolidated proceedings. The latter concern the denial of a temporary injunction , an interlocutory appeal therefrom , and a petition for a writ of injunction to preserve the jurisdiction of this C ourt pending disposition of the interlocutory appe al . Offline assert s that the trial court ’ s entry , subsequent to Castleman filing the above referenced proceedings , of a final order or summary judgment rendered both proceedings moot. We deny the motion without prejudice.2

The motion to dismiss is founde d upon the existence of a final order or summary judgment entered by the trial court in the underlying cause , No. 2020 - 540288 . The trial court did sign , on October 29 , 2020 , an order granting Offline ’ s motion for summary judgment. It state d :

On October 1 4 , 2020 , the Court having considered [Offline ’ s ] Motion for Summary Judgment to be in proper form
. . . the Court after reviewing the pleadings , motions , exhibits , and responses on file , is of the opinion that the Motion for Summary Judgment should be gran ted. IT IS , THEREFORE , ORDERED that the
. . . Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted. SO ORDERED
. Nowhere in the order is there any declaration as to whether any party was granted or denied final relief , in whole or in part , or whether there remains an y unresolved issue pending in the trial court. Th e writing , which demonstrates only the trial court ’ s ruling viz a motion , is neither a final appealable order n or a final appealable summary judgment for the reasons described in our opinion in Cause No. 07 - 20 - 00312 - CV , styled Timothy Castleman , et al. v. Internet Money Ltd. , et al. It fails t o a djudicate the rights involved or evince a final result recognized by the law. Consequently , the foundation to the pending motion is lacking. We deny the motion to dismiss without prejudice to refiling same if the trial court enters a final , appealable order or summary judgment in the underlying cause.
Per Curi a m
#### CITY OF CANTON, Mississippi v. James W. HALL.

No. 50610.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 6, 1978.

R. L. Goza, Canton, for appellant.

James H. Herring, Canton, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, P. J., and SUGG and COFER, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court,' Madison County; Rufus H. Broome, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
## R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ J a c k i e E W a t s o n ( F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 4 1 8 )

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : W e d n e s d a y

, J u l y 0 8

, 2 0 1 5 3 : 2 8 P M

T o : j a c k w a t s o n p h o t o g r a p h y @ h o t m a i l

. c o m

D e a r M s

. W a t s o n :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f o r m y o u t h a t t h e f o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k e t N o

. F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 1 4 1 8 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f o r t h e F e d e r

a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r

a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r

o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

D e s c r i b e t h e a i r

c r a f t m a k e ( s )

, m o d e l ( s )

, a n d t y p e ( s ) ( i

. e

. , f i x e d

‐ w i n g

, r o t o r c r a f t

, l i g h t e r

‐ t h a n

‐ a i r ) f o r t h e

p r o p o s e d U A S o p e r

a t i o n

. T h e d e s c r i p t i o n ( s ) s h o u l d i n c l u d e t h e m a x i m u m w e i g h t ( i n c l u d i n g p a y l o a d )

. T h i s

i n f o r m a t i o n c a n b e l o c a t e d i n t h e a i r c r a f t m a n u a l ( s )

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t a t w

w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y

p r o p r i e t a r y i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y o u w a n t

u s t o p r o c e s s y o u r r

e q u e s t a n y f u r

t h e r

, w e m u s t r

e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v e b y 7 / 2 2 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t

r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

I f y o u h a v e a n y q u e s t i o n s

, p l e a s e f e e l f r e e t o c o n t a c t m e a t ( 2 0 2 ) 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4

.

R e g a r d s

, D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
**Exhibit 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Glynis A. Bryan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Swift Transportation Co., Inc.; and2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport.Date: April 30, 2007         /s/ Glynis A. Bryan   Glynis A. Bryan   Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32

 

FORM OF 906 CERTIFICATION

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2005 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

David G. Whalen, the Chief Executive Officer and Kevin F. Mahoney, the Chief Financial Officer of A.T. Cross Company, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699

Date: July 24, 2015

On July 13 2015, representatives of EPA attended a meeting with the BP America. The meeting 

was held by videoconference. Attendees discussed the ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards rulemaking. BP America provided materials for the meeting and are attached.

The following is a list of attendees and their affiliation: 

Name Affiliation

Bob Stout BP America (BP)

Amy Trojecki BP

Dana Wood BP

Jim Nolan BP

Bob Sussman Sussman & Associates

Janet McCabe EPA/Office of Air and Radiation (OAR)

Debbie Jordan EPA/OAR

Mike Koerber EPA/Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards (OAQPS)

Richard Wayland EPA/OAQPS

Phil Lorang EPA/OAQPS

Erika Sasser EPA/OAQPS

Scott Mathias EPA/OAQPS
EXHIBIT 32.1






ODYSSEY PICTURES CORPORATION


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Odyssey  Pictures  Corporation  (the Company) on Form 10-K  for the period  ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Foster,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been provided  to  Odyssey  Pictures  Corporation  and will be  retained  by  Odyssey Pictures  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






October 14, 2010




/s/ John W. Foster


John W. Foster


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

RAYMOND GARCIA AGUILAR, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 17-3192 

(D.C. Nos. 5:16-CV-04077-JAR & 

5:02-CR-40035-JAR-1) 

(D. Kan.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

This matter is before us on the “Motion of the United States for Summary 

Affirmance” (“Motion”). The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district 

court’s judgment based on this court’s recent published decision in United States v. 

Pullen, 913 F.3d 1270 (10th Cir. 2019), en banc rev. denied April 15, 2019. DefendantAppellant does not dispute that United States v. Greer, 881 F.3d 1241 (10th Cir. 2018) 

and Pullen control the outcome of this appeal; Mr. Aguilar does not contest summary 

 *

 After examining the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that 

oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted 

without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under 

the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, 

however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 

32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

May 3, 2019

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

affirmance of the district court’s judgment, but he reserves the right to appeal this matter 

to the United States Supreme Court for further review. 

In light of the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. Based on this court’s decision 

in Pullen, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court 

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk 

by: Chris Wolpert 

 Chief Deputy Clerk
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James JURGENSMIER.

No. 62316.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 3, 1978.

In re: James Jurgensmier, applying for writs of certiorari, review and mandamus. Parish of Caddo.

Writ denied.
255 La. 145

#### DIXIE PIPELINE COMPANY v. Marguerite Kidder BARRY.

No. 50210.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1970.

In re: Dixie Pipeline Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Martin. 227 So.2d 1.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7035 

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to provide for emergency 

supplemental funding under local agriculture market program for 

COVID–19 losses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 27, 2020 

Ms. MENG (for herself and Mr. UPTON) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 to provide 

for emergency supplemental funding under local agriculture market program for COVID–19 losses, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm to Fridge Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7035 IH

1 SEC. 2. EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING UNDER 

2 LOCAL AGRICULTURE MARKET PROGRAM 

3 FOR COVID–19 LOSSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 210A(d) of the Agricul5 tural Marketing Act of 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1627c(d)) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(7) PAYMENTS FOR COVID–19 LOSSES.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may 

9 make payments to entities eligible to receive a 

10 grant under this paragraph (5) or (6) who sub11 mit to the Secretary an application at such 

12 time, in such manner, and containing— 

13 ‘‘(i) a description of how the appli14 cant’s business has been impacted by 

15 COVID–19; 

16 ‘‘(ii) a narrative explaining how the 

17 applicant proposes to use such payments to 

18 expand the capacity of their sales in order 

19 to properly package and sell agricultural 

20 products to consumers either through gro21 cery stores or direct sale; and 

22 ‘‘(iii) such other information as the 

23 Secretary may require. 

24 ‘‘(B) APPLICABILITY OF LIMITATIONS.—A 

25 payment under this paragraph shall not be subVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:51 Jun 18, 2020 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7035.IH H7035

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7035 IH

1 ject to the limitations specified under subpara2 graphs (D) and (E) of paragraphs (5) and (6). 

3 ‘‘(C) BUY AMERICAN.—Chapter 83 of title 

4 41, United States Code, shall apply with re5 spect to purchases made using payments re6 ceived under this paragraph.’’. 

7 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

8 210A(i)(3)(A) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 

9 (7 U.S.C. 1627c(i)(3)(A)) is amended by adding at the 

10 end the following: 

11 ‘‘(iii) PAYMENTS FOR COVID–19

12 LOSSES.—There are authorized to be ap13 propriated, in addition to the amounts 

14 made available under paragraph (2), to 

15 provide payments under subsection 

16 (d)(7)— 

17 ‘‘(I) $20,000,000 for payments 

18 to entities eligible to receive a grant 

19 under subsection (d)(5); and 

20 ‘‘(II) $14,000,000 for payments 

21 to entities eligible to receive a grant 

22 under subsection (d)(6).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 17, 2016

p1110

Order 

Clerk

November 17, 2016

153541

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153541

COA: 331240

Wayne CC: 13-003211-FC

ANDREW BERNARD KEITH,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Horton (Docket No. 150815) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the quarterly report of DataMetrics Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel
Bertram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Rafik Moursalien, the
Controller of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

         DATAMETRICS CORPORATION

         By: Daniel Bertram
             ---------------------------
               Daniel Bertram, CEO

         Dated: July 20, 2006

         By: Rafik Moursalien
             ---------------------------
               Rafik Moursalien, CFO

         Dated: July 20, 2006