alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Special Emphasis Panel in Undergraduate Education; Notice of 
Meetings

    This notice is being published in accord with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended). During the periods January 
through April, 1997, the Special Emphasis Panel will be holding panel 
meetings to review and evaluate research proposals. The dates, contact 
person, and types of proposals are as follows: Special Emphasis Panel 
in Division of Undergraduate Education.
    1. Date: January 11-13, 1998.
    Contact: Terry Woodin, Program Director, Room 835, 703-306-1666 
TIMES: 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. (January 11); 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 
each day (January 12-13).
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA.
    Type of Proposal: NSF Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher 
Preparation (CETP) Program Reverse Site.
    2. Date: January 21-24, 1998.
    Contact: Duncan McBride, Program Director, Room 835, 703-306-
1666 TIMES: 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. (January 21); 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m. each day (January 22-23); 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. (January 24) 
PLACE: Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army/Navy Drive, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Proposal: Instrumentation & Laboratory Improvement (ILI) 
Program Phase I.
    Date: January 28-31, 1998.
    Contact: Duncan McBride, Program Director, Room 835, 703-306-
1666 TIMES: 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. (January 28); 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m. each day (January 29-30); 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. (January 31) 
PLACE: Doubletree Hotel, 300 Army/Navy Drive, Arlington, VA.
    Type of Proposal: Instrumentation & Laboratory Improvement (ILI) 
Program Phase II.
    4. Date: April 6-8, 1998.
    Contact: Terry Woodin, Program Director, Room 835, 703-306-1666 
TIMES: 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. (April 6); 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each 
day April 7-8.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, VA TYPE OF.
    Proposal: NSF Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher 
Preparation (CETP).
    Program Reverse Site (3rd Year).
    Type of Meetings: Closed.
    Purpose of Meetings: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to NSF for financial support.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate proposals submitted to the 
Directorate as part of the selection process for awards.
    Reason For Closing: The proposals being reviewed include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information, financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (4) and 
(6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: December 22, 1997.
M. Rebecca Winkler,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 97-33901 Filed 12-29-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
255 La. 146

#### Mrs. Laura BELGARD et al. v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al.

No. 50214.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1970.

In re: Mrs. Laura Belgard et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 227 So.2d 24.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPEATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRELY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,288
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      4,610
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,291
<PP&E>                                       1,077,810
<DEPRECIATION>                               (429,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 760,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,350
<BONDS>                                        340,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          115,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     233,434
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   760,030
<SALES>                                        242,278
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               332,235
<CGS>                                          130,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                47,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,083
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,359)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61


</TABLE>
#### Jose INFANZON, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 73-1131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 16, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

					NO. 2-04-354-CV

MIKE GREWING	APPELLANT

	V.

JOYCE HUCKABY	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 235TH DISTRICT COURT OF COOKE COUNTY

	----------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On November 18, 2004 and December 10, 2004, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.	

DELIVERED: January 27, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 23, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67073]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33433]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY


Fee for Services to Support FEMA's Offsite Radiological Emergency 
Preparedness (REP) Program

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with FEMA Rule 44 CFR Part 354, published in the 
Federal Register on March 24, 1995, (60 FR 15628), FEMA has established 
a fiscal year (FY) 1998 hourly rate of $31.46 for assessing and 
collecting fees from Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensees for 
services provided by FEMA personnel for FEMA's REP Program.

DATES: This user fee hourly rate is effective for FY 1998 (October 1, 
1997, to September 30, 1998).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mr. O. Megs Hepler, III, Division Director, Exercises Division, 
Preparedness, Training and Exercises Directorate, Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-
2867.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As authorized by Public Law 105-65 (111 
Stat. 1377), an hourly user fee rate of $31.46 will be charged to NRC 
licensees of commercial nuclear power plants for all site-specific 
biennial exercise related services provided by FEMA personnel for the 
REP Program. This hourly user fee rate will be charged in accordance 
with the provisions of 44 CFR 354, published in the Federal Register on 
March 24, 1995, (60 FR 15628). All funds collected under this rule will 
be deposited in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to offset 
appropriated funds obligated by FEMA for the REP Program.
    The hourly rate is established on the basis of the methodology set 
forth in FEMA Rule 44 CFR 354.4(b), ``Determination of site-specific 
biennial exercise-related component for FEMA personnel,'' and will be 
used to assess and collect fees for site-specific biennial exercise 
related services rendered by FEMA personnel.
    The hourly rate is intended only to be applied to charges to NRC 
licensees for services provided by FEMA personnel for the site-specific 
biennial exercise-relate component referenced above, not for charges 
for services provided by FEMA personnel under the flat fee component 
referenced at 44 CFR 354.4(d) nor for services provided by FEMA 
contractors. Services provided by FEMA contractors will be charged in 
accordance with 44 CFR 354.4 (c) and (d) for the recovery of 
appropriated funds obligated for the Emergency Management Planning and 
Assistance (EMPA) portion of FEMA's REP Program budget.

    Dated: December 16, 1997.
Kay C. Goss,
Associate Director for Preparedness, Training, and Exercises.
[FR Doc. 97-33433 Filed 12-22-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6718-06-M
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-18-00025-CR &

06-18-00026-CR

BRADLEY CURTIS KOUGHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 1726304 & 1726305

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O RDER

Court reporter Judith Snyder recorded volume four of the trial court proceedings in 

appellate cause numbers 06-18-00025-CR and 06-18-00026-CR, styled Bradley Curtis Kougher 

v. The State of Texas, trial court cause numbers 1726304 and 1726305, respectively, in the 8th 

Judicial District Court of Hopkins County, Texas.1

 A copy of this record has been requested by a 

family member of Bradley Curtis Kougher. 

This record contains sensitive data. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10. Sensitive data includes,

(1) A driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, 

tax identification number or similar government-issued personal identification 

number;

(2) bank account number, credit card number, and other financial 

account number;

(3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a 

minor at the time the offense was committed.

TEX. R. APP. 9.10(a). Rule 9.10(b) provides, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or 

paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive 

data.” Further, “[t]he filing of a document constitutes a certification by the filer that the document 

complies with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this rule.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(e). 

 1

Prior to releasing the reporter’s record, we issued an order to Jana Atchison Rushing, the official court reporter in 

this case, requiring the redaction of sensitive data from the record. In response to this order, Rushing provided certain 

redacted portions of the record and further advised this Court that Snyder reported volume four of these proceedings. 

Rushing advised this Court that Snyder indicated that she would require a redaction order.
3

Having determined that volume four of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, as that 

term is defined by Rule 9.10, we hereby order Snyder to redact this volume of any and all sensitive 

data it contains.2

The redacted volume four of the reporter’s record is to be received no later than 

Wednesday, August 28, 2019. If the redacted volume four of the reporter’s record is not received 

by August 28, we warn Snyder that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show 

cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Court for failing to obey its order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: August 14, 2019

 2

The record contains the names of five persons who were minors when the offense was committed. See TEX. R. APP. 

9.10(a)(3). In accordance with Rule 9.10(d), “Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter ‘X’ in place of each 

omitted digit or character or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating that the data has been redacted.” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(d).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 239 (Friday, December 12, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32537]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Oregon Coast Provincial Advisory Committee (PAC) will meet 
on January 8, 1998, in Florence, Oregon, at the Florence Events Center, 
715 Quince Street, Florence, OR. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. 
and continue until 3:30 p.m. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Reports from PAC Subcommittees (Adapative Management Area, Water 
Quality/Fish, Media, and Timber); (2) FY 1997 PAC Accomplishments/FY 
1998 Outlook; and (3) Water Quality Report (Clean Water Act and Water 
Quality Mgmt. Plans)/303d Designations. All Oregon Coast Provincial 
Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Two 15-minute open 
public forums are scheduled for 10:00 a.m. and 2:45 p.m. Interested 
citizens are encouraged to attend. The committee welcomes the public's 
written comments on committee business at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Direct questions regarding this meeting to Trish Hogervorst, Public 
Affairs Officer, Bureau of Land Management, at (503) 375-5657, or write 
to Forest Supervisor, Siuslaw National Forest, P.O. Box 1148, 
Corvallis, Oregon 97339.

    Dated: December 4, 1997.
James R. Furnish,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 97-32537 Filed 12-11-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
C ATHERINE KIM ,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. C OAC H, INC ., a

fore ign profit c orporation, De fe nda

nt-Appe l le e . No. 16-15409 D.C . No. 1:14-c v-00574-HG-R

LP
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii He le n W . Gillm or, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 14, 2017 ** Honolulu, Ha

wa ii B e fore : FISHER , PAEZ a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. C athe rine Kim a

ppe a ls the sum

m ary judgm e nt e nte re d in fa

vor of C oa c h, Inc
. on he r c la im

of re ta lia tion unde r Title VII. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a

n d we a ffirm
. 

# F IL ED J UN 16 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a

ppropria te for public ation a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * T he pa ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l argum e nt. S

e e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).1. The distric t c ourt prope rly a ssum e d subje c t m atte r jurisdic tion ove r Kim ’ s re t a l iation c l a im . Eve n a ssum ing thec ha rge Kim file d with theEqua l Em ploy m e nt Opportunity

C om m ission (EEOC ) wa s untim e ly , the untim e line ss of
an EEOC c ha

rge is a non-jurisdic tiona l de fe c t. S e e Zipe s v . Trans W

orld Airline

s, Inc
. , 455 U.S. 385, 393 (1982); W righte n v . Me tro. Hosps., Inc
. , 726 F.2d 1346, 1351 n.3 (9th C ir. 1984). 2. The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m ary judgm e nt on Kim ’ s
re ta lia tion c la im . Kim a lle ge d C oa c h re duc e d he r work hours be twe e n April a nd Se pte m be r 2013 in re ta lia

tion for he r having file d a la wsuit in Feb rua

ry 2013. As the d istric t c o urt pointe d out, howe ve r, C oa c h did not le arn of the la wsuit until la

te M ay 2013. The la

wsuit, the n, c ould not ha

v e c a use d the re d

uc tion in hours. Kim the re fore fa ile d

to m ake out a

prim a fa c e c a se of re t a lia

tion. Se e Ray v . He nde rson , 217 F.3d 1234, 1240 (9th C ir. 2000) (“ To m ak e out a prim a fa c ie c a se of
re ta lia tion, a n e m ploy e e m ust show tha

t (1) he e nga ge d in a

prote c te d a c tivity ; (2) his e m p loy e r subje c te d him

to a n a dve rse e m

ploy m e nt a c tion; a

nd (3) a c a usa l link
e xists be t we e n the prote c t e d a c tivity and the a dve rse a c tion.” ). 3. Kim argue s C oa c h re duc e d he r work hours be twe e n August 2012 a nd Oc tobe r 2012 in re ta lia

tion for he r hav ing file d a n EEOC c ha

rge in August 2012. Kim , howe ve r, fa ile d to pre se nt this a rgum e nt to thedistric t c ourt. The argum e nt 2is the re fore wa ive d, se e Bolk e r v . C omm’r , 760 F.2d 1039, 1042 (9th C ir. 1985),
and we de c line to re a c h the issue . Eve n if we we re to re a c h the issue , Kim ha s pre s e nte d no e vide nc e to sugge st a ny re duc t ion in work hours oc c urre d during the pe riod in que stion. AFFIRM E D.

3
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 34 / Friday, February 20, 2015 / Proposed Rules 9259 

in the Rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: December 30, 2014. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03451 Filed 2–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0554; FRL–9923–17– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Texas; 

Emissions Inventories for the DallasFort Worth and Houston-GalvestonBrazoria Ozone Nonattainment Areas 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Texas State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted to 

meet Emissions Inventory (EI) 

requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) 

for the Dallas-Fort-Worth (DFW) and the 

Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) 

nonattainment areas. EPA is proposing 

to approve the SIP revisions because 

they satisfy the CAA EI requirements for 

the DFW and HGB nonattainment areas 

under the 2008 eight-hour ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(NAAQS). EPA is proposing to approve 

the revisions pursuant to section 110 

and part D of the CAA and EPA’s 

regulations. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before March 23, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning 

Section (6PD–L), Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 

Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically or through hand delivery/ 

courier by following the detailed 

instructions in the ADDRESSES section of 

the direct final rule located in the rules 

section of this Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nevine Salem, (214) 665–7222, 

salem.nevine@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

final rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP submittal as a direct rule without 

prior proposal because the Agency 

views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this action no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

For additional information, see the 

direct final rule which is located in the 

rules section of this Federal Register. 

Dated: February 9, 2015. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03448 Filed 2–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
#### Shelly SWIFT and Swift Ford Tractor, Inc., etc. and Shelly Swift d/b/a Swift Ford Tractor Co., Petitioners, v. J. I. CASE COMPANY and Florida Tractor Mart, Inc., Respondents.

No. 42965.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 20, 1972.

Certiorari denied. 266 So.2d 379.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, Mc-CAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13-14A



| | I, Robert Benou, Chairman, Chief Executive
      Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Conolog Corporation (the small
    business issuer), certify that:
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | 1.                                                                                                                                                                     
|
| | 2.                                                                                                                                                                     
|
| | 3.                                                                                                                                                                     
|
| | 4.                                                                                                                                                                     
|
| |                                                                                                                                                                        
|
| |                                                                                                                                                                        
|
| |                                                                                                                                                                        
|
| |                                                                                                                                                                        
|
| | 5.                                                                                                                                                                     
|
| |                                                                                                                                                                        
|
| |                                                                                                                                                                        
|



|Date: March 14,
    2008 |  | /s/ Robert S. Benou                                       
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  | Robert Benou                                              
|                         |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
|                         |  | and Treasurer                                             



---
#### Nathan MALORY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-918.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 14, 1972.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.