alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5


 


AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


BETWEEN


CHICAGO ATLANTIC REAL ESTATE FINANCE, INC.


AND


CHICAGO ATLANTIC REIT MANAGER, LLC


 


This Amendment to Management Agreement (this “Amendment”)
is made as of October 26, 2021, by and between Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company),
and Chicago Atlantic REIT Manager, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Manager”, and together with the
Company, the “Parties”) and amends the Management Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into between
the Parties on May 1, 2021. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given them in the
Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the
definition of Hurdle Rate in the Agreement


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises
and for other good and valuable considerations, the Parties hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	The definition of “Hurdle Rate” under Section 1 shall be amended and restated in its entirety as follows:



 


“Hurdle Rate” means, with respect to any
fiscal quarter, 2.00% and, with respect to any fiscal year, 8% per annum.


 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT
BLANK]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto
has executed this Amendment to Management Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	 	CHICAGO ATLANTIC REAL ESTATE FINANCE, INC. 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Tony Cappell
	 	 	Name: 	Tony Cappell
	 	 	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer
	 	 	 
	 	CHICAGO ATLANTIC REIT MANAGER, LLC. 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Andreas Bodmeier
	 	 	Name:	Andreas Bodmeier
	 	 	Title:	Authorized Person
Exhibit 8.1
  Subsidiaries and Certain Affiliates of
Telefónica Chile
  The following chart sets forth the
organization of TelefónicaChile’s subsidiaries and affiliates, all of
which are Chilean corporations, except for TBS Celular Participações S.A., which
is a Brazilian corporation. Percentage ownership information is as ofDecember 31,
2008.
  TelefónicaChile’s business activities are managed
through the following operating subsidiaries:




(1) Telefónica
Asistencia y Seguridad S.A. was dissolved as of December 31, 2008.


(2) Telefónica Chile
holds 28.84% of Atento Chile S.A. through the additional equity interest of 1.4%
from its subsidiaries Telefónica Larga
Distancia and Telefónica
Empresas.
#### Sherry McFARLAND, Appellant, v. TRULY NOLEN, INC., et al., Appellees.

No. 77-310.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 28, 1978.

*914Gold & Fox, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Adams, George, Schulte & Ward and Amy Shield Levine, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and KE-HOE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Riddle v. Aero Mayflower Transit Co.,*73 So.2d 71 (Fla.1954).
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 248 (Monday, December 29, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 67620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-33720]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


1998 National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs Program

    Notice is hereby given that Pub. L. 105-83, as amended, authorizing 
the National Capital Arts and Cultural Affairs Program, has been funded 
for 1998 in the amount of $7,000,000.00. All requests for information 
and applications for grants should be addressed to: Charles H. 
Atherton, Secretary, Commission of Fine Arts, Pension Building, Suite 
312, 441 F Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001; Phone: 202-504-2200.
    Deadlines for receipt of submission of grants applications is 2 
March 1998.
    This program provides grants for general operating support of 
organizations whose primary purpose is performing, exhibiting, and/or 
presenting the arts. To be eligible for these grants, organizations 
must be located in the District of Columbia, must be not-for-profit, 
non-academic institutions of demonstrated national repute, and must 
have annual income, exclusive of federal funds, in excess of one 
million dollars for the current year and for the past three years.
Charles H. Atherton,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 97-33720 Filed 12-24-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7601
CHARLES W. BARLOW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLARD L. HERRON, Sheriff of Randolph County, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 96-7604
CHARLES W. BARLOW, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLARD L. HERRON, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-56-2, CA-96-79-2) Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997 Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.23 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles W. Barlow, Appellant Pro Se. Rory L. Perry, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: This is a consolidated appeal in which the Appellant, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his two petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the records and thedistrict court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny certificates of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Barlow v. Herron , No. CA96-56-2 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 24, 1996); Barlow v. Herron , No. CA-96- 79-2 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Catherine Qin Zhang, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of AutoNavi Holdings Limited (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Intentionally omitted];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
June 27, 2011



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Catherine Qin Zhang
|Name:  |  | Catherine Qin Zhang    
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
I 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 233 

To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 to include financial 

criminal activities associated with the facilitation of severe forms of 

trafficking in persons within the factors considered as indicia of serious 

and sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking in persons, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2021 

Mr. STEIL (for himself and Ms. DEAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 

to include financial criminal activities associated with 

the facilitation of severe forms of trafficking in persons 

within the factors considered as indicia of serious and 

sustained efforts to eliminate severe forms of trafficking 

in persons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exposing the Financ5 ing of Human Trafficking Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 233 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF FINANCIAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES. 

2 Subsection (b) of section 108 of the Trafficking Vic3 tims Protection Act of 2000 is amended by adding at the 

4 end the following new paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(13) Whether the government of the country 

6 vigorously investigates, seeks to prevent, and pros7 ecutes financial criminal activities associated with 

8 the facilitation of severe forms of trafficking in per9 sons.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
- calendar january 2014
- calendar february 2014
- calendar march 2014
#### Barbara SANDERS, Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF DADE, State of Florida, Respondent.

No. 73-1153.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 21, 1973.

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.
#### Robert Clay RICE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. GG-218.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 28, 1978.

Carl G. Swanson, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and George R. Georgieff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty for the offense of lewd assault on a minor, Section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1975). Appellant was sentenced to two years imprisonment, but the court ordered that the remainder of the sentence should be suspended after appellant served seventy-two (72) days in county jail and appellant was then to be placed on probation for a period of two years. During the period of probation, an affidavit charging a violation of probation was filed. After a hearing on the violation, appellant’s probation was revoked. Appellant was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment for the original offense.

*910The split sentence alternative was approved in *State v. Jones,*327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976). Therein, the court held that upon a violation of probation, the trial court is authorized to impose any sentence which might have been imposed originally. Further, the court held that a defendant must be given credit for the time spent in jail pursuant to the split sentence probation order under 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975).

Under *State v. Jones, supra,*upon revocation of appellant’s probation, the trial court could impose a sentence of ten (10) years. See Section 800.04, 775.082(3)(c), Florida Statutes (1975). However, the court was required to allow appellant credit for the time he served in county jail pursuant to the split sentence. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and the cause is remanded with directions to credit appellant with time previously served in jail. Appellant need not be present for this purpose.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.
#### Harold T. JAMES, Petitioner, v. CITY PRODUCTS CORPORATION et al., Respondents.

No. 43678.

Supreme Court of Florida.

May 25, 1973.

Rehearing Denied June 26, 1973.

Certiorari dismissed.

CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Order filed June 11, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00276-CV

____________

RENE D. MORSE, Appellant

V.

BEN NEWMAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1123479

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due June 6, 2019. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before July 11, 2019 the 

court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### Jessie Henry DAMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. Q-405.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Feb. 15, 1973.

Robert C. Dean, of Carswell, McKenzie, Dean & Owen, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Richard W. Prospect, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 240 (Monday, December 15, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Page 65716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-32586]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 20, 1997, and published in the Federal 
Register on September 3, 1997, (62 FR 46512), Arenol Corporation, 189 
Meister Avenue, Somerville, New Jersey 08876, made application by 
renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered 
as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed below:


                                                                        
                   Drug                               Schedule          
                                                                        
N-Ethylamphetamine (1475)................  I.                           
Difenoxin (9168).........................  I.                           
Amphetamine (1100).......................  II.                          
Methamphetamine (1105)...................  II.                          
                                                                        

    The firm plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances to 
produce pharmaceutical products for its customers.
    DEA has considered the factors in Title 21, United States Code, 
Section 823(a) and determined that the registration of Arenol 
Corporation to manufacture the listed controlled substances is 
consistent with the public interest at this time. Therefore, pursuant 
to 21 U.S.C. Sec. 823 and 28 C.F.R. Secs. 0.100 and 0.104, the Deputy 
Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, hereby orders 
that the application submitted by the above firm for registration as a 
bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed 
above is granted.

    Dated: November 25, 1997.
John H. King,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 97-32586 Filed 12-12-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-M
**Exhibit 32.1**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONI, E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of CrownCrafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending July 1, 2007 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 15, 2007              /s/ E. Randall Chestnut   E. Randall Chestnut, Chairman of the Board,   President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Rita Marie NORTHEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-1297.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 21, 1974.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Broward County; James Reasbeck, Judge.

Appeal dismissed.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of Compañía de Telecomunicaciones de Chile S.A. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, José Molés Valenzuela, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2008



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ José Molés Valenzuela
|José Molés Valenzuela    
|                         
|Chief Executive Officer  

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Daxor Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, David Frankel, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Daxor
Corporation.

| |                          
| | -------------------------
| | /s/ David
  Frankel      
| |                          
| |                          
| | David
  Frankel          
| | Chief
  Financial Officer
| | July 31,
  2008          

---
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Illinois State Action Plan and Appendixes
I 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7176 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve dependent coverage under 

the TRICARE Young Adult Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2020 

Mrs. LURIA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve dependent 

coverage under the TRICARE Young Adult Program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Fairness 

5 for Military Families Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENTS TO DEPENDENT COVERAGE 

7 UNDER TRICARE YOUNG ADULT PROGRAM. 

8 (a) EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1110b of 

9 title 10, United States Code, is amended in subsection 

10 (b)— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7176 IH

1 (1) by striking paragraph (3); and 

2 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

3 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. 

4 (b) ELIMINATION OF SEPARATE PREMIUM FOR A

5 YOUNG ADULT.—Section 1110b of such title is further 

6 amended by striking subsection (c). 

7 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 1075(c)(3) 

8 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘section 1076d, 1076e, or 1110b’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

10 1076d or 1076e’’. 

11 (d) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

12 section shall apply with respect to determinations of de13 pendency (and related determinations of premiums) under 

14 the TRICARE program pursuant to section 1110b of title 

15 10, United States Code, made on or after January 1, 

16 2020. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### Clyde LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 71-204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 14, 1971.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender and Alan S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Joel Rosenblatt, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SWANN, C. J., and HENDRY and BARKDULL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was charged with the crime of robbery.

He entered a plea of not guilty and waived jury trial. Upon trial he was found guilty as charged and sentenced to a term of ten years in the penitentiary. Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment and sentence on the ground that the trial court erred in permitting in court identification based upon illegal photographic confrontation.

After carefully reviewing the record, considering the briefs and argument of counsel, we have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Therefore the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

BARKDULL, Judge

(concurring).

I concur in the majority opinion for the further reason that the constitutional question was not adequately preserved by appropriate objection at the time of trial. See: Robertson v. State, 94 Fla. 770, 114 So. 534; Fraterrigo v. State, 151 Fla. 634, 10 So.2d 361; Tennant v. State, Fla.App.1967, 205 So.2d 324; Koran v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 735.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT** **TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
      1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Bernard
      Goldstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350),
      that:




(1)  The
      Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.









/s/
      Bernard Goldstein


Bernard Goldstein


Chief Executive Officer


July
      7,
      2006