alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 256 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 256

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE AGAINST 
              IRAQ RESOLUTION OF 2002.

    The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution 
of 2002 (Public Law 107-243; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) is hereby repealed.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 256

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To repeal the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq 
                          Resolution of 2002.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COTTON STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       104,741,934
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       15,062,058
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         14,927,908
<EQUITIES>                                   3,638,036
<MORTGAGE>                                   2,468,620
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             144,203,637
<CASH>                                       1,142,722
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           4,115,866
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      44,214,474
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             199,477,040
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            128,781,273
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,754,504
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,737,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               199,477,040
<PREMIUMS>                                  12,510,013
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          4,901,244
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             243,667
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,902,717
<BENEFITS>                                   8,673,807
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,699,640
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         3,810,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,373,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,789,091
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,584,780
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,584,780
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Austin LLOYD and Ruby Lloyd, his wife, Appellants, v. The CITY OF FORT PIERCE, a municipal corporation, et al., Appellees.

No. 70-855.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 17, 1971.

Rehearing Denied April 27, 1971.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
#### Roger GUIDRY et al. v. Leo TOUPS et al.

No. 61142.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 11, 1978.

In re: Roger Guidry, et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit. Parish of Lafourche. 351 So.2d 1280.

Writ denied.
**Exhibit 32.2**
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION
I, Amy Vidrine Samson, Chief Financial Officer of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the “Company”), do herebycertify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending December 26, 2004 (the“Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2.  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 9, 2005    /s/ Amy Vidrine Samson
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,555,190
<SECURITIES>                                   328,790
<RECEIVABLES>                                  643,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (14,688)
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,442,479
<PP&E>                                         2,959,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                 239,447
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,530,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          210,482
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       91,932
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,940,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,530,422
<SALES>                                        1,700,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,700,985
<CGS>                                          237,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,758,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (561,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)


</TABLE>
----

EXHIBIT 32.1

ODYSSEY PICTURES CORPORATION    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF    THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Odyssey  Pictures  Corporation  (the Company)  on Form  10-KSB for the period  ended June 30,  2007 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, John Foster,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been provided  to  Odyssey  Pictures  Corporation  and will be  retained  by  Odyssey Pictures  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

March 12, 2009

/s/ John W. Foster

---------------------------

John W. Foster    Chief Executive Officer and    Chief Financial Officer
MYL_EX10.29(b)_2013.12.31-10K






Exhibit 12.29(b)


Description of Amendments to the Retirement Benefit Agreement, dated January 27, 1995, between Mylan Inc. (the “Company”) and C.B. Todd (the “Agreement”)


In January 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company amended Section 3.3 of the Agreement (which is filed as Exhibit 10(b) to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1995) to provide that, should Mr. Todd retire after March 31, 1996, he would receive $300,000 each year for fifteen years.  Mr. Todd initially retired from the Company in May 1999, but returned to serve as President and Chief Operating Officer from 2001 to 2002 before retiring again, effective September 1, 2002.  In October 2002, the Board of Directors of the Company again amended the Agreement, this time to increase Mr. Todd’s retirement benefit by $150,000 per year, effective as of September 1, 2002, to a total of $450,000 per year.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-17-00784-CV

ESTATE OF Estella Q. CAMPOS, Deceased

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014PC3884

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 24, 2018

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

In the case underlying this appeal, the trial court signed an appealable order on September 

22, 2017. The deadline to file a motion for new trial was October 23, 2017. See TEX. R. CIV. P.

329b(a). Because no motion for new trial or other timely postjudgment motion that would extend 

the deadline to file a notice of appeal was filed, the notice of appeal was due thirty days after the 

judgment was signed, on October 23, 2017. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. A motion for extension of time 

to file a notice of appeal was due not later than November 7, 2017. See id. R. 26.3. 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on November 22, 2017, fifteen days after the last 

day to timely file the notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Because Appellant’s notice of appeal 

appeared to be untimely, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing not later than January 3, 

2018, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.3(a);
04-17-00784-CV

- 2 -

Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion 

for extension of time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate 

court’s jurisdiction.”). We warned Appellant that if she failed to respond as ordered within the 

time provided, this appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

On December 28, 2017, Appellant filed a partially completed docketing statement. But to 

date, Appellant has not filed a response to our December 13, 2017 order requiring her to show how 

this court has jurisdiction in this appeal. Contra id. R. 42.3(c). 

We conclude Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, and Appellant did not 

invoke this court’s jurisdiction. See Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. We dismiss this appeal for 

want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

PER CURIAM
Treasury 1603: Recommendations for Annual Report Production Documentation

The Annual Report is to verify property operation and energy production of the eligible energy property.

Please take time to review this documentation prior to submitting your annual report. These

recommendations are designed to assist you in completing Section 4.3 of the annual report. While these

recommendations do not address all possible scenarios for a complete annual report, most applicants

should find that reviewing these suggestions will minimize requests for additional documentation.

Note: In Section 4 of the annual report, applicants must provide explanations for all significant variances

in annual production and all significant interruptions of service.

Recommended Supporting Documentation

For properties directly connected into a utility grid (Note: Only one form of documentation is

required):  

 Submit a recent statement from the utility documenting energy production. Please remember,

the utility statement should be dated within the annual reporting year.

 Submit a dated printout or screen shot, in either tabular or graphical form, from the local

monitoring system which documents energy production.

 Submit an inverter or net metering production reading. Many inverters and net meters have a

digital display which indicates total energy production to date. If your inverter or net meter has

this ability, provide a picture of this display or provide a listing of values from a log indicating

date/time of each reading.

For properties not connected into a utility grid (solar thermal, solar lighting or geothermal heat

pump):

 Submit a signed and dated report from the owner/lessee’s management or authorized

representative (e.g. property manager, commissioning agent, engineer, installer, etc.) attesting

that the property is producing and operating as intended.

For biomass and combined heat and power properties:

 Submit data and calculations supporting percentage of fossil fuel use and energy efficiency, as

reported.

This is for applicant use only and does not address all possible scenarios for a complete annual report.

Please do not upload this list of recommendations. Ultimately, IRS rules and Treasury 1603 requirements

apply.  

See Program Guidance here: http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/recovery/Pages/1603.aspx .
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ML Life Insurance Company of New York
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Nikos K. Kardassis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



| | /s/ NIKOS K. KARDASSIS
Nikos K. Kardassis
President and
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 26, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ML Life Insurance Company of New York and will be retained by ML
Life Insurance Company of New York and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
TUDOR FUND FOR EMPLOYEES L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,088,210
<SECURITIES>                                 7,477,448
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,600,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,116,451
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,166,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,670,964
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,495,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,166,451
<SALES>                                      3,362,714
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,362,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               649,909
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,712,805
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,712,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,712,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   848.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   845.18


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                7,785
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        12,351
<ALLOWANCES>                          1,205
<INVENTORY>                             630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     22,988
<PP&E>                                9,864
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       32,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                18,150
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  9
<OTHER-SE>                           14,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         32,666
<SALES>                              49,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     66,257
<CGS>                                33,507
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        33,507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     28,896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        281
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       32
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       4,258
<INCOME-TAX>                          1,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   2,551
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .30
        

</TABLE>
256 La. 759

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Henry C. WILLIAMS v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50808.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 25, 1970.

In re: Henry C. Williams applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7088 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7088

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, as the ``Senator Jack Hill 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2020

    Mr. Carter of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. 
Ferguson, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Lewis, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Woodall, 
   Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Hice of 
Georgia, Mr. Loudermilk, Mr. Allen, Mr. David Scott of Georgia, and Mr. 
Graves of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, as the ``Senator Jack Hill 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATOR JACK HILL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 111 James Street in Reidsville, Georgia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Senator Jack Hill Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Senator 
Jack Hill Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-121-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)